Isaiah 17:1–11

Isaiah 17:1 · Darby

The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from [being] a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap.

Isaiah opens a new oracle against Damascus, the capital of Syria — a power God had once used against His own people. Two questions run through the commentators here: why this city, and how far ahead does the sentence reach?

"Burden": a word with weight

The chapter opens with a term Isaiah uses to head several of these prophecies. Writers disagree about its exact force, and set out two options:

Besides its everyday use, this word occurs at the start of several prophecies, as "The burden of Babylon," "the burden of Moab" (Isa. 13:1; Isa. 15:1, etc.). Scholars are not agreed about the force of massa in such places. Its natural meaning would be "a judgment that lies heavy on the people," but some take its meaning to be "an oracle or sentence pronounced against them."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

One writer draws out what the word pictures:

The word burden has the thought of a weight heavy to bear, for God is bringing His displeasure to bear on mankind, and He intends people to feel it.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

A city that stops being a city

Damascus will not just be damaged. It will lose the status of a city altogether. One writer weighs that against the age and fame of the place:

drop context-less opener; plainer words

William Kelly

The reason: an alliance against Jerusalem

God does not judge Damascus for being foreign. He judges it for the alliance it joined. Syria had sided with Ephraim — the northern kingdom of Israel — against Jerusalem:

Isaiah prophesied that Damascus would become a heap of ruins, because it allied itself with Ephraim against God's city Jerusalem (Isa. 17:1; compare also Amos 1:3-5; Jer. 49:23-27; Zech. 9:1). God had used the kings of Syria to punish Israel; but, as in other cases, He afterwards brought them to nothing for their arrogance and cruelty.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Fulfilled in Isaiah's own century

One writer names the king who actually struck the blow:

split 36-word grade-18 sentence; plain wording

William Kelly

Present event, future horizon

That last sentence points to the method running through this whole block of Isaiah. The prophet takes a live crisis of his own day and uses it as the doorway into something much larger:

I do not see how it is possible, in all this part of Isaiah, from chapter 13 and even before, not to see that the Spirit of God is taking up the great plan of God, and speaking of future coming events, but taking hold of present ones as an occasion, and that connected with the government of God then, which will be fully displayed at the end.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The judgment reaches Israel too

The burden begins with Damascus, but the chapter turns to Israel as well. The chastening has a purpose:

archaic wording modernised, meaning kept

J. N. Darby

Summary

- Word. "Burden" heads the prophecy. It carries God's displeasure as a weight He means people to feel. Writers differ over whether the word means the heavy judgment itself or the sentence spoken against a people.

- Ruin. Damascus, the ancient and famous city of Syria, is not just defeated. It is unmade — a heap of ruins, with the cities of Aroer left as pasture for flocks.

- Reason. An alliance brought the sentence: Syria joined Ephraim against Jerusalem. God had once used Syria's kings to punish Israel, then brought them to nothing for their arrogance and cruelty.

- Record. Tiglath-Pileser, not Sennacherib, destroyed Damascus, as Isaiah 7 had foretold. Yet the prophecy runs on past him to a reappearance and overthrow in the last days.

- Remnant. The same burden reaches Israel, and there it turns to mercy. God takes away every other support until a small remnant looks to the Holy One of Israel alone.

Isaiah 17:2 · Darby

The cities of Aroer are forsaken they shall be for flocks; and they shall lie down and there shall be none to make them afraid.

Isaiah 17 opens a "burden" against Damascus, the capital of Syria. A burden is a prophecy of judgment. Verse 2 shows the aftermath: towns emptied of people, left to grazing sheep. Commentators read this as history already fulfilled, and also as a pattern reaching to the last days. In it, the same stroke that levels Syria falls on Israel too.

An ancient city reduced to pasture

Damascus was no obscure town, and its ruin left nearby cities to the flocks.

Damascus, which lay to the north of the Holy Land, was the very ancient and most celebrated city of Syria in the old days. (See Gen. 15:2) It was to be made a heap of ruins — the cities of Aroer a place for flocks.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The verse names Aroer. One reference work places it in a single line:

District near Damascus. Isa. 17:2.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The reason behind the ruin

The judgment was not arbitrary. Syria had joined with Ephraim in a plot against Jerusalem. Ephraim was the northern kingdom of Israel. That plot brought the sentence down. God had earlier used Syria against Israel. That did not save Syria from judgment in its turn.

Isaiah prophesied that Damascus would become a heap of ruins. This was because of its alliance with Ephraim against God's city Jerusalem. Isa. 17:1: compare also Amos 1:3-5; Jer. 49:23-27; Zech. 9:1. God had used the kings of Syria to punish Israel. But later, as in other cases, He brought them to nothing for their arrogance and cruelty.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Fulfilled in history, by a named king

The wrecking of Damascus is not left vague. One writer names the king who did it, the alliance behind it, and the earlier chapter where Isaiah announced it.

It is worth keeping in mind that it was not Sennacherib but Tiglath-Pileser who destroyed Damascus. That ruin followed the alliance of Pekah and Rezin, made to remove David's house in Judah — unworthy and false as Ahaz was. Isaiah had predicted this in Isa. 7, and our chapter speaks of it becoming a heap of ruins. But the prophecy clearly goes on to its reappearance and overthrow in the latter day.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Israel judged alongside her old ally

The prophet does not stop at Syria. The partner in the plot shares the plotter's fate, and God has His own use for the hostility of the nations.

Long ago Syria and Ephraim conspired against the kingdom of David's son, and it ended in their own undoing. Now once more the remarkable feature of this judgment is that God will deal with His people as well as with their old ally.

He will gather out of them everything that causes stumbling, and He will punish those who do wrong. He will use the nations' hostility to clean that threshing floor, the land of Israel. He will deal with His people in a judicial way. The nations may encourage themselves and each other with the hope that things are going hard for Israel. But their conspiracy will offend God, however much He may use it for Israel's good.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

But the chastening of Israel has an aim beyond punishment, and a remnant survives it.

Next comes the burden of Damascus, brought down from a city to a heap of ruins. In verses 4-6 we see the judgment of Israel, but a few grapes are left there for gleaning. God chastises His people until they stop resting on their own strength and rely on God alone. Yet they will dwindle to a remnant, two or three here and four or five there. Then they will look to Himself, the only source of strength, the Holy One of Israel.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A prophecy still reaching forward

The ancient fulfilment did not exhaust the words. Writers see the chapter looking on to a day when Israel's old troublers are themselves troubled.

But the judgment is also future. And the enemies of Israel, who trouble His people, will be troubled "in that day." The chapter closes with a solemn word: "This is the portion of those who loot us, and the lot of those who plunder us."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why a later generation repeats an earlier fall

If the same sentence falls twice, is that fair? One writer answers with a household picture. A son who knows what disgraced his father, and walks the same road anyway, is more guilty, not less.

Suppose a child grows up knowing his father's dishonour, and hearing of his disgrace and punishment. If he had any right feeling, would not that sin be especially hateful in his eyes? The public example of his father's evil ways would always be before him. But suppose the son treated it lightly, and used it as encouragement to walk the same path. Is it not just that a still more severe punishment should fall on that son?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. Damascus allied with Ephraim against Jerusalem. The ruin was earned, not random.

- Instrument. God used Syria against Israel. Then He broke Syria for its arrogance and cruelty. Being God's tool is no protection.

- Reach. Tiglath-Pileser wrecked the city. Yet the prophecy runs past him to a future overthrow "in that day."

- Purge. The stroke that emptied Syrian towns also fell on Israel. God used the plotters' hatred to clean the threshing floor of Israel's land.

- Remnant. The chastening aims at dependence. Stripped to a few gleanings, they look to the Holy One of Israel alone.

Isaiah 17:3 · Darby

The fortress also shall cease from Ephraim, and the kingdom from Damascus, and the remnant of Syria they shall be as the glory of the children of Israel, saith Jehovah of hosts.

Isaiah 17 opens with a judgment against Damascus, the capital of Syria. By the third verse the sentence widens to take in Ephraim as well — the northern kingdom of Israel. Why does God strike His own people alongside a foreign city, and what is left once the "fortress" and the "kingdom" are gone?

Why the two fall together

Syria and Ephraim had joined forces to attack Judah and unseat the royal line of David. Verse 3 sentences both partners in one breath.

Long ago Syria and Ephraim conspired against the kingdom of David's son, and it ended in their own defeat. Once again the remarkable feature of this judgment is that God will deal with His people as well as with their old ally… He will gather out all the causes of stumbling from them and punish the transgressors. He will use their enmity to purge that threshing-floor, the land of Israel. He will deal with His people in a judicial way.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Damascus had its own history with God. Being useful to Him did not put Syria beyond judgment.

Isaiah prophesied that Damascus would become a heap of ruins. The reason was its alliance with Ephraim against God's city Jerusalem. Isa. 17:1; compare also Amos 1:3-5; Jer. 49:23-27; Zech. 9:1. God had used the kings of Syria to punish Israel. But later, as in other cases, He brought them to nothing for their arrogance and cruelty.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The fortress removed

Ephraim had looked to Damascus for help. So the two lose their power together, and the "fortress" goes with the city.

So in Isa. 17 Damascus is to be a heap of ruins, when Ephraim too, who looked to her for help, ceases to have power. And in the latter day the mighty rush of nations that interfere, to their own destruction, is rebuked.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

This loss is not an accident. God has a purpose in it, and He keeps at it until that purpose is reached.

God chastises His people until they stop resting on their own strength and rely on God alone… When God's people are faithless, they can still act with the good sense and wisdom of the natural man. When they do not rest on God, they are weaker than the world. And when He gives them over to chastening, they break to pieces at once.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A judgment already carried out

This judgment fell in history. Commentators name the king who carried it out, and the plot that brought it on.

Keep in mind that it was not Sennacherib but Tiglath-Pileser who destroyed Damascus. That ruin followed the alliance of Pekah and Rezin, who tried to remove David's house from the throne of Judah — unworthy and false as Ahaz was. Isaiah had predicted this in Isa. 7, and our chapter speaks of Damascus as a heap of ruins. But the prophecy clearly goes on to its reappearance and overthrow in the latter day.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The chapter does not stop with that ancient ruin.

The power that dealt with Damascus and Ephraim in Isaiah 17, we know, was the Assyrian. But the chapter goes on in the clearest way to his doings in the last day.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What survives the stripping

Verse 3 compares the remnant of Syria to the glory of Israel. The verses that follow show how thin that glory becomes — and who still stands at the end.

In the days of Isaiah, Damascus was allied with the ten tribes. The prophecy soon moves from Damascus to the children of Israel, for disaster was to come on both. Both had joined in alliance against Judah. The picture used is harvest, of corn or of grapes, which would leave them poor and thin. Yet a remnant would remain, like a gleaning of grapes or a few berries on an olive tree. That remnant will turn their eyes to "the Holy One of Israel," and away from the idolatrous things that once held them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Alliance. Syria and Ephraim plotted together against David's line. Verse 3 sentences them together: the ally's kingdom and Israel's fortress fall in one stroke.

- Reversal. God had used Syria's kings to punish Israel. Their arrogance and cruelty then brought them to nothing. Being useful to God is no shield.

- Stripping. The lost fortress is the point, not an accident. God chastens until His people stop resting on their own strength.

- Weakness. A faithless Israel is weaker than the world around it. Under chastening it breaks at once.

- Remnant. After the harvest comes a gleaning. The few who remain look to the Holy One of Israel, and away from the idols that once held them.

Isaiah 17:4 · Darby

And in that day it shall come to pass, that the glory of Jacob shall be made thin, and the fatness of his flesh shall become lean.

Isaiah's message opens against Damascus, but by verse 4 the judgment has turned on Jacob's own glory. The picture is a well-fed body wasting away — so why does God do this to His own people?

Judgment That Reaches God's Own People

Damascus and Ephraim had joined in an earlier plot against the house of David. Now judgment falls on both.

As of old, Syria and Ephraim conspired against the realm of David's son, and brought about their own downfall. So once more the remarkable feature of this judgement is that God will deal with His people as well as with their old ally... He will gather out of them everything that causes offence, and punish those who break His law. He will use their enmity to purge that threshing-floor of the land of Israel. He will deal with His people as a judge.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Harvest Figure

Verse 4 belongs to a run of farming pictures: harvest, gleaning, a few olives left on a branch.

The prophetic message however quickly passes from Damascus to the children of Israel, for disaster was to come on both, since both had united in alliance against Judah. The figure used is of harvest, whether of corn or of grapes. It would leave them poor and thin. Yet a remnant would be left, like a gleaning of grapes or a few berries on an olive tree. That remnant will turn their eyes to "the Holy One of Israel," and away from the idolatrous things that once held them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why the Fat Has To Go

The leanness is not an accident of war. It has a target: a people resting on their own strength.

In verses 4-6 we see the judgment of Israel, but gleaning grapes are left there. God chastises His people till they cease to rest on their own strength, instead of relying on God alone. Yet when they have dwindled to a remnant — two or three here, four or five there — they will look to Him, the only source of strength, the Holy One of Israel. Their idolatry had left them desolate... When God's people are faithless, they can act with all the prudence and wisdom of the natural man. When they do not rest on God, they are feebler than the world. And when chastening falls on them, they break to pieces at once.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Few Who Are Left

The survivors of this thinning end up facing a new direction.

The prophecy relates to a time when "the glory of Jacob" is to be "made thin, and the fatness of his flesh" to "grow lean." Those who survive are pictured looking to their Maker, instead of to the altars which their own hands had made. They have respect to the Holy One of Israel, instead of to the groves and images they once worshipped.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Isaiah's Day and the Last Days

Part of this was history within a generation. But the prophecy does not stop there.

It is worth keeping in mind that Tiglath-Pileser destroyed Damascus, not Sennacherib. That ruin followed the alliance of Pekah and Rezin, who set out to depose David's house in Judah — unworthy and false as Ahaz was. This had been predicted by Isaiah in Isaiah 7, and our chapter speaks of its being a heap of ruins. But the prophecy clearly goes on to its reappearance and overthrow in the latter day.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Note: Trotter quotes an older translation that reads "made thin" where the ESV has "brought low."

Summary

- Fatness. Jacob's "glory" is a well-fed body, and God Himself reduces it. The leanness is His act, not just an enemy's success.

- Cause. God thins Israel for its idolatry and its alliance. He judges His people beside the very ally they leaned on instead of Him.

- Purpose. The chastening runs until they stop resting on their own strength. A people who do not rest on God prove feebler than the world.

- Remnant. What survives is a gleaning: two or three berries on an outermost branch. God leaves that remnant on purpose.

- Result. The few who remain look to their Maker, not to altars their own hands built. Leanness ends in the Holy One of Israel.

Isaiah 17:5 · Darby

And it shall be as when the reaper gathereth the corn, and reapeth the ears with his arm; yea, it shall be as he that gathereth ears in the valley of Rephaim.

Isaiah's message against Damascus turns, without warning, on Israel herself, pictured as a reaper sweeping up grain and leaving almost nothing behind. The field named here, the Valley of Rephaim, was a battlefield Israel remembered well — so why is God's own people the crop?

Judgment That Falls on Both Allies

Damascus and the northern kingdom of Israel, called Ephraim, had joined against Judah. The prophecy strikes both. One commentator reads the reaping as God's own work on His own ground:

Long ago Syria and Ephraim conspired against the kingdom of David's son, and brought defeat on themselves. Now again the remarkable feature of this judgment is that God will deal with His people as well as with their old ally… He will gather out all offences from them and punish the transgressors. He will use their enmity to purge that threshing-floor of the land of Israel. He will deal with His people in a judicial manner.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Valley of Rephaim

The name is not random. It marks ground where Israel's enemies once gathered and where David broke them:

A valley on the south of Jerusalem, in which the Philistines gathered themselves against Israel, and where David twice decisively defeated them. 2 Sam. 5:18, 22; 1 Chr. 14:9-17; Isa. 17:5. In the Authorised Version it is twice called the "Valley of the Giants." Joshua 15:8; Joshua 18:16.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The name itself carries the memory of what once terrified Israel there:

These giant races, the enemies of God's people, can overthrow you with the mere sight of them. They picture the enemy's power: monsters, and, you might say, superhuman.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why the Crop Is Cut So Close

This cutting has an aim, and it stops at a set point:

In verses 4-6 we see the judgment of Israel, but gleaning grapes are left there. God disciplines His people until they stop resting on their own strength, instead of relying on God alone. Yet when they have dwindled to a remnant — two or three here, four or five there — they will look to Him, the only source of strength, the Holy One of Israel.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the Gleanings Become

What the reaper's arm leaves behind matters most. The few who survive are known by what they now look at:

The people shrink so far that the survivors are like "gleaning grapes," or the "two or three berries left in the top of the highest bough after the shaking of an olive tree." These survivors look to their Maker instead of to the altars their own hands had made. They respect the Holy One of Israel instead of the groves and images they once worshipped as idols.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Another writer draws out the same double effect of the harvest figure:

The figure is used of harvest, whether of grain or of grapes, which would leave them poor and thin, yet a remnant would be left, like a gleaning of grapes or a few berries on an olive tree, and that remnant will turn their eyes to "the Holy One of Israel," and away from the idolatrous things that formerly held them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

History, and Beyond History

The chapter had a real fulfilment in Isaiah's own day, and it also looks further ahead. First, the history:

It is worth remembering that not Sennacherib but Tiglath-Pileser destroyed Damascus. That ruin followed the alliance of Pekah and Rezin, who set out to remove David's house from the throne in Judah… But the prophecy goes on to its reappearance and overthrow in the last days.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

And on where the chapter finally lands:

Isaiah 17 shows how its aim is the last days, reached through present circumstances… Jacob is brought low at the same time. Yet in the remnant there is deliverance and salvation, when Israel is at its lowest — the remnant looking to God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — Israel joined an alliance against David's house, so the judgment aimed at Damascus fell on God's own people too.

- Cutting — The reaper's arm is God clearing His own threshing-floor. He gathers out the offences and punishes the transgressors.

- Field — In the Valley of Rephaim, giant-like enemies once massed against Israel, and David broke them twice. Now Israel is the crop cut there.

- Gleanings — God does not reap clean: two or three berries, a few ears left — a remnant remains.

- Change — The cutting goes on until they stop leaning on their own strength. Then they look to the Holy One of Israel.

Isaiah 17:6 · Darby

And a gleaning shall be left in it, as at the shaking of an olive-tree two, three berries above, in the tree-top; four, five in its fruitful boughs, saith Jehovah, the God of Israel.

The chapter opens with a word against Damascus, but by this verse the prophet is looking at Israel and counting what survives God's harvest. Why does God cut His own people down to so little, and what do the few left over become?

Judgment that falls on ally and people together

Damascus was Israel's old ally. The striking thing in this judgment is that God does not spare the partner He calls His own.

Long ago Syria and Ephraim plotted together against the kingdom of David's son, and brought themselves down by it. Once again the remarkable feature of this judgment is that God will deal with His people as well as with their old ally... He will gather out all the causes of stumbling from them and punish the transgressors. He will use their enmity to purge that threshing-floor of the land of Israel. He will deal with His people in a judicial way.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A harvest picture

Reaping corn, gathering grapes, beating an olive tree. Each picture ends the same way: almost nothing left, but not quite nothing.

The figure here is harvest, whether of corn or of grapes. It would leave them poor and thin. Yet a remnant would remain, like a gleaning of grapes or a few berries on an olive tree. That remnant will turn their eyes to "the Holy One of Israel," and away from the idolatrous things that once held them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The few who are left, and where they look

The counting in this verse — two or three, four or five — measures a nation cut down to almost nothing. One writer ties that thinning to a set time, and to troubles that end with the survivors turning back to God.

This prophecy relates to a time when "the glory of Jacob" is to be made thin, and "the fat of his flesh" is to grow lean. The people shrink so far that the survivors are like gleaning grapes, or the two or three berries left in the top of the highest bough after someone shakes an olive tree. Those who do survive look to their Maker instead of to the altars their own hands had made. They have respect to the Holy One of Israel, not to the groves and images they once worshipped. This is the outcome of these closing troubles.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Why God thins them down

The stripping has a purpose. It runs until the people have nothing of their own left to lean on.

In verses 4-6 we see the judgment of Israel, but gleaning grapes are left there. God disciplines His people till they stop resting on their own strength, instead of relying on God alone. Yet when dwindled down to a remnant of two or three here and four or five there, they shall look to Himself, the only source of strength, the Holy One of Israel... When God's people are faithless, they are able to act even with the shrewdness and wisdom of the natural man. When they do not rest on God, they are weaker than the world.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Mercy inside the judgment

The few berries are no accident of the harvest. They stand on God's own choice.

If God is to punish their departure from Him by visiting them outwardly and inwardly, this passage plainly marks out a remnant as well. Mercy rejoices against judgment, and God makes good His own glory in both. But Jehovah's pruning hand must thin that returned remnant. Still the holy seed will be there when judgment has done its work over and over again. It is the stock, the rooted stump of the nation. There is ever a remnant according to the election of grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same few berries, singing

The same picture returns later in Isaiah. There the remnant does more than survive — it praises.

The gloom of judgments on the earth fills the first 12 verses of the chapter. But at verse 13 light begins to break. It points to a remnant of God-fearing ones, under the same figure used in Isaiah 17:6. So even in the darkest hour a note of praise will sound, and people will acknowledge and honour God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Left, not lost — the beating of the tree falls on God's own people, not only on their ally Damascus. God purges His threshing-floor and punishes the transgressors.

- Left thin — the harvest pictures show a nation made poor and lean, cut from a full crop to a few berries out of reach.

- Left leaning — the thinning goes on until the people stop resting on their own strength. Without God they are weaker than the world.

- Left looking — those who remain turn from the altars their own hands made to their Maker, the Holy One of Israel.

- Left singing — the same picture returns later in Isaiah, where the few left sound a note of praise in the darkest hour. There is always a remnant according to the election of grace.

Isaiah 17:7 · Darby

In that day shall man look to his Maker, and his eyes shall have regard to the Holy One of Israel.

Isaiah 17 opens with judgment on Damascus, Israel's old ally. Then it turns to Israel itself, whose glory shrinks until only a gleaning is left. Verse 7 is the turning point. A stripped people finally looks away from what its own hands made, and up to the God who made them.

Judgment on both sides of the alliance

The chapter is not only about a foreign city. God's hand reaches His own people too, alongside the ally they had joined.

Long ago Syria and Ephraim plotted against the kingdom of David's son, and it cost them dearly. Once again the striking feature of this judgment is the same: God will deal with His people as well as with their old ally. … He will gather out of them everything that makes people stumble, and He will punish those who do wrong. He will use their enemies' hostility to clear that threshing-floor, the land of Israel. He will deal with His people in a judicial way.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"In that day" — beyond Assyria

Real invasions lie behind this chapter. But commentators see the prophecy running on past them to the last days.

Isaiah 17 proves that the aim is the last days, seen through present circumstances. Here the Assyrian is the occasion, not Babylon: the invasions of Shalmaneser, Sargon and Sennacherib, above all Tiglath-Pileser and Sennacherib. But Jacob is brought low at the same time. In the remnant there is deliverance and salvation, in the lowest condition of Israel, and the remnant looks to God. The nation is judged for leaving Jehovah and trusting its own ways.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Looking away from what their own hands built

Only a few survive this judgment — and their eyes change direction.

So few of the people are left that the survivors are like "gleaning grapes," or the "two or three berries left in the top of the highest bough after the shaking of an olive tree." Those who do survive are pictured as looking to their Maker, not to the altars their own hands had made. They have respect for the Holy One of Israel, not for the groves and images that were once the objects of their idol worship. Such is to be the outcome of these closing troubles.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Why idols must be abandoned, and not for the first time

That turning is needed because idolatry does not stay buried. Commentators note that Israel had already suffered for it and had long abandoned it, yet Scripture says many will return to it — which is exactly why the call to trust God is pressed.

To whom, then, should Israel trust, if not in Jehovah? It might seem strange that such an appeal should be needed. Could not everyone see the idols and learn what they were? Had not their ancestors suffered for idolatry? Had they not renounced it for centuries? All true. Yet we read that most of the nations will go back to this sin and worship idols again (Isa. 2:20; Isa. 17:7-8; Isa. 30:22; Isa. 31:7; Hosea 14:3). And the call to trust in Jehovah will be needed all the more, because in that day those who fall away will be outwardly prosperous.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The name they look to

"The Holy One of Israel" is Isaiah's own title for God, and verse 7 uses it. It carries two more thoughts: Redeemer, and Creator — which is what "Maker" says here.

Throughout Isaiah He is called "the Holy One of Israel." This title of the Lord, who deals with His people in judgment and in mercy, appears twenty-five times in Isaiah. Read 1:4; 5:19, 24; 10:20; 12:6; 17:7 … The Holy One of Israel is Jehovah; He is the Redeemer of His people. … This Holy One is the Creator. "The Holy One has created it" (41:20).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

One by one, and open to anyone

This turning is not only national. Grace meets people one by one, and it meets those who have nothing left.

The same prophet speaks of a faithful remnant of the people who will cling to the Holy One of Israel, believing His word and profiting by His grace (chap. 11:20; 17:7). This will be an individual work. Whoever believes on the Lord will not be ashamed. … The great principle of grace comes out here. It is the same grace in the precious words of the Lord Jesus: "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven" (Matt. 5:3).

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Stripped. God judges His own people, not just their ally. He thins their glory to a gleaning and purges the land like a threshing-floor.

- Looking. At Israel's lowest point, the remnant looks to God. Deliverance is there, not in the nation's own ways.

- Exchanged. Their eyes turn to their Maker, not to altars their own hands built. They look to the Holy One, not to the old images.

- Named. The One they look to is Isaiah's "Holy One of Israel" — both Redeemer and Creator, which is why He is called their Maker.

- Personal. This looking is an individual work of grace. Whoever believes will not be ashamed. The blessing belongs to the poor in spirit.

Isaiah 17:8 · Darby

And he will not look to the altars, the work of his hands, nor have regard to what his fingers have made, neither the Asherahs nor the sun-images.

Isaiah 17 opens with a message against Damascus. The prophet then turns to Israel, whose glory God is about to thin out, and verse 8 shows what a stripped people will no longer look at. Why must God reduce a nation to almost nothing before it stops looking at what its own hands built?

The judgment that falls on both partners

Syria and Ephraim — the northern kingdom of Israel — had joined against Judah. The judgment strikes both.

Long ago Syria and Ephraim conspired against the kingdom of David's son, and it ended in their own defeat. Once again the remarkable feature of this judgement is that God will deal with His people as well as with their old ally… He will gather out all the causes of stumbling from among them and punish the transgressors. He will use their enmity to purge that threshing-floor, the land of Israel. He will deal in a judicial manner with His people.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Brought low until only God is left

The thinning in the verses just before is not random loss. It has a purpose. The few who remain are the ones who look up.

God chastises His people until they stop resting on their own strength instead of relying on God alone. Yet when they have dwindled to a remnant of two or three here and four or five there, they shall look to Himself, the only source of strength, the Holy One of Israel. For their idolatry they had been made desolate.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where the eyes turn instead

The verse works by contrast. For every thing the eyes leave, there is One the eyes find. That change of gaze is the outcome of the trouble.

Those who survive are pictured as looking to their Maker, instead of to the altars which their own hands had made. They have respect to the Holy One of Israel, instead of to the groves and images which were once the objects of their idolatrous worship. Such is to be the outcome of these closing troubles.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Two titles do the work. "Maker" answers the altars that men made; the Holy One of Israel answers the groves and images. What you made can never replace the One who made you.

The idols God Himself grinds to powder

God's judgment does not stop with the people. It reaches the idols themselves. (Where the ESV has "the Asherim" and "the altars of incense", the older translation these writers used says "groves" and "sun-images".)

There is "the iniquity of Jacob" which will have to be purged from them by these severe dealings from the hand of God… for Jacob the smitings will reach to the altars and groves and sun-images, which shall be ground to powder. So the very judgments that God will inflict upon His people, largely by the hand of other people, will have the effect of destroying the very things that had been a snare to them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Idolatry is not only Israel's past

It is easy to read this verse as a description of something long finished. One writer lists it with other passages to show the opposite: the sin returns before it is dropped for good.

Could not all see the idols, and learn what they were? Had not their forefathers suffered for idolatry? Had they not for centuries renounced it? All true. Yet we read that the majority of the nations will return to this sin, and again worship idols. (Isa. 2:20; Isa. 17:7-8; Isa. 30:22; Isa. 31:7; Hosea 14:3.) And the call to trust in Jehovah will be all the more needed, because in that day those who fall away will be outwardly prosperous.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Handiwork still passes for worship

Altars and carved poles are not the only things hands can make. The same instinct works with better vocabulary.

Are not men today really worshipping Christ after their own fashioning? Are they not worshipping a god which they themselves have manufactured, out of their own thoughts, calling it by the name of the living God? … The root of it among professed Christians is putting Christian activity in the place of Christian faith. Faith must always be at the foundation. If Christian faith is not there, there is bound to be an idol of some kind, no matter how great the activity may be — even activity that looks fruitful for God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Stripped — God thins the glory of Jacob. A people who leaned on their own strength have nothing left to lean on but Him.

- Turned — the eyes move from the altars their hands made to the Maker who made them. Images give way to the Holy One of Israel.

- Purged — the same blows that fall on Jacob grind his altars and images to powder. The snare itself goes.

- Ahead — writers read this as still to come. Idolatry returns before it is dropped for good, and the call to trust the Lord matters most when those who fall away look prosperous.

- Today — a god assembled out of our own thoughts is still handiwork, however familiar the name written on it.

Isaiah 17:9 · Darby

In that day shall his strong cities be as the forsaken tract in the woodland, and the mountain-top which they forsook before the children of Israel; and there shall be desolation.

Isaiah's warning against Damascus turns here to Israel's own strong cities. They end up as empty as ruins abandoned long ago, and the next verse names the cause.

Judgment on both allies

The chapter opens against Damascus in Syria, but the judgment does not stop there. Kelly points to an old alliance that brings both partners under the same judgment.

Long ago Syria and Ephraim conspired against the kingdom of David's son, and it ended in their own defeat. Now the striking feature of this judgment is the same: God will deal with His people as well as with their old ally… He will gather out of them everything that causes offence and punish those who do wrong. He will use their hostility to purge that threshing floor, the land of Israel. He will deal with His people as a judge.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Beyond Isaiah's own century

The ruin of Damascus was real history. Kelly names the invader who caused it, and shows how far the words run.

It is well to remember that Tiglath-Pileser destroyed Damascus, not Sennacherib. That ruin followed the alliance of Pekah and Rezin, who tried to remove David's house from the throne in Judah — unworthy and false as Ahaz himself was. Isaiah had predicted this in Isaiah 7, and our chapter speaks of Damascus becoming a heap of ruins. But the prophecy clearly goes on to its reappearance and overthrow in the latter day.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Desolation, then the reason for it

The verse ends with desolation, and verse 10 gives the reason. Trotter notices the order. The prophet first shows how the trouble ends, then turns back to what caused it. He quotes verse 10 from an older translation.

But then we come back, as it were, to the troubles themselves, and to what brought them on the nation. "And there will be desolation. Because you have forgotten the God of your salvation, and have not been mindful of the Rock of your strength."

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Walls without trust

The verse says "their strong cities" become deserted places. Darby gives the principle behind that: everything depends on whether God's people rest on Him.

When God's people are faithless, they act with nothing more than the prudence and wisdom of the natural man. When they do not rest on God, they are weaker than the world. When God gives them over to discipline, they break to pieces at once.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Desolation that lasted

The desolation here was no short setback. Pollock names two stages that left the land empty and unfruitful.

Two things had to happen first, to prepare for the fulfilment of Isaiah's ancient prophecy. The land had to be emptied of people, and then it had to become barren and sterile. Titus, the Roman general, emptied it when he scattered the Jews. Then God withheld the latter rain. That rain failed in May, just when the land needed it most, so the country turned barren and unproductive, overrun with thorns.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

What survives the stripping

The same chapter that empties the cities leaves a few people behind. Hole explains the harvest pictures in the verses just before this one.

The picture is of harvest, whether of grain or of grapes. It would leave them poor and thin. Yet a remnant would be left, like a gleaning of grapes or a few berries on an olive tree. That remnant will turn their eyes to "the Holy One of Israel," and away from the idolatrous things that once held them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Commentators place the fulfilment differently. Kelly carries the prophecy on to the latter day, while Pollock traces the desolation through the long years after Titus.

Summary

- Forgetting. One root explains the desolation of the strong cities. The people forgot the God of their salvation and the Rock of their strength.

- Judgment. Damascus and Ephraim had conspired together, so God deals with His own people as well as with their ally. He even uses the enemy's hostility to purge the land.

- Weakness. Walls cannot replace trust. When God's people stop resting on Him, they are weaker than the world, and they break at once when He disciplines them.

- Reach. Tiglath-Pileser really did ruin Damascus, but the prophecy runs on past him. The land's long emptiness and barrenness show how far "there will be desolation" reached.

- Remnant. The stripping is not the end. What the harvest leaves is small: a gleaning, a few berries. That remnant turns its eyes to the Holy One of Israel, away from the idols that once held it.

Isaiah 17:10 · Darby

For thou hast forgotten the God of thy salvation, and hast not been mindful of the rock of thy strength; therefore shalt thou plant pleasant plantations, and shalt set them with foreign slips

Isaiah 17 opens with a message of judgment against Damascus. The prophet soon turns to Israel and gives the reason their land lies waste: they forgot the God who saved them. Forgetting is the cause. The next line shows the effect — the people fall back on their own planting.

Damascus and Israel Judged Together

The chapter opens with a foreign city but does not stay there. Damascus and Israel had joined forces, so judgment falls on both.

In the days of Isaiah, Damascus had been allied with the ten tribes. Its message of judgment fills the three verses that open Isaiah 17. But the prophecy soon passes from Damascus to the children of Israel. Disaster was to come on both, since both had joined in alliance against Judah.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why Forgetting God Makes a People Weak

The verse opens with "For" — the ruin has a moral cause, not a political one. Forgetting God does more than offend Him. It changes what a people can survive.

God chastises His people till they cease to rest on their own strength, instead of relying on God alone... When God's people are faithless, they can still act with the shrewdness and wisdom of the natural man. But when they do not rest on God, they are weaker than the world. And when God hands them over to chastening, they break to pieces at once.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Weight of This Particular Forgetting

Any nation could forget God. This one He had kept alive in the desert and given a land as a gift. That history makes the charge heavier.

Israel's turning her back on God was an especially wicked act. No other nation stood in the relationship to God that they did. His keeping them alive in the desert for forty years was a miracle of the first order. Their possession of Canaan was an act of grace on God's part. Again and again He sought to teach them the lesson that departure from God is a grievous thing.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

The Rock Forgotten in Good Times

The song of Moses uses the name Jeshurun for God's upright, beloved people. There it is good times, not hard times, that pull them away from the Rock.

Jeshurun grew fat and kicked. God's loved, upright one turned rebellious when times were good — a strange yet common case. He gave up his Maker and thought little of the Rock of his salvation. Then the heart that had drifted from Him turned to His opposites. Foreign gods came in, with all their detestable practices. Newly invented gods replaced the One who had brought them into being.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

(Older translations read "the Rock of your strength" where the ESV has "the Rock of your refuge.")

Planting Instead of Trusting

Commentators read the planting in the next line as Jews back in their own land, still not trusting God. The farming works; the harvest does not.

In Isaiah 17:10-11 we find them there, still forgetting the God of their salvation and not remembering the Rock of their strength. They plant pleasant plants and set them with foreign cuttings. But here is how their farming ends: "though you make them grow on the day that you plant them, and make them blossom in the morning that you sow, yet the harvest will flee away in a day of grief and incurable pain."

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

The Land Emptied and Made Barren

Before foreign vine-branches could be set in that ground, the land itself had to change. Commentators describe two steps.

The land had first to be emptied of people, and second to become barren. Titus scattered the Jews, and that did the first. God withheld the latter rain, and that did the second. Without that rain in May, when the land badly needed it, the country turned barren and was overrun with thorns.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

But the failed harvest is not God's last word. The same writer looks ahead to what God intends by it.

Their hopes, however, will be dashed to the ground when the day of the great tribulation bursts upon them... It must come, for only that way will the Jew be humbled at last and blessed. Israel can enter the land of her possession only through purification, repentance, and acknowledging their Messiah, our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Forgetting — the ruin has a stated cause. God carried them through the desert and gave them their land. They turned their backs on Him.

- Weakening — people who stop resting on God grow weaker than the world, and break to pieces when chastening comes.

- Substituting — with the Rock out of mind, the hands get busy. Pleasant plants and foreign cuttings replace the strength they forgot.

- Flourishing — the planting really does grow, and hopes rise with it. Growth is not the same as blessing.

- Harvest — what grows without God flees away in a day of grief. Only repentance and acknowledging their Messiah bring the true blessing.

Isaiah 17:11 · Darby

in the day of thy planting wilt thou make [them] to grow, and on the morrow wilt thou make thy seed to flourish; [but] the harvest will flee in the day of taking possession, and the sorrow will be incurable.

This verse ends a warning that began with forgetting God: the planting shoots up fast, then the harvest vanishes in a day of grief. Commentators read it as history Isaiah's hearers would live through, and as a picture of Israel's future.

Where the Prophecy Sits

Chapter 17 opens against Damascus. One writer names the king who destroyed it, and notes that the prophecy does not stop there.

It is worth remembering that it was not Sennacherib but Tiglath-Pileser who destroyed Damascus. That ruin followed the alliance of Pekah and Rezin, who set out to remove the house of David from the throne in Judah — unworthy and false as Ahaz was. Isaiah had predicted this in chapter 7, and our chapter speaks of Damascus becoming a heap of ruins. But the prophecy clearly goes on to its reappearance and overthrow in the latter day.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer finds the same double reach in the farming language of verses 10 and 11.

All this found a fulfilment in the days immediately ahead, yet will have a fuller fulfilment in the last days still to come. Writers often link the prediction about the "pleasant plants," or "plantations," and the "strange slips" to what Jewish immigrants have recently been doing in Palestine. They have been busy with plantations in their farming colonies. They have imported vast quantities of vine cuttings from other lands to restart vineyards.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Cause Behind the Failed Harvest

The failure is not bad weather or bad soil. Verse 10 gives the reason. One writer sees in these verses a people back in their own land, but back there in unbelief.

It is clear, from several passages, that many of the Jews will return to their own land in unbelief. In Isaiah 17:10-11 we find them there, still forgetting the God of their salvation and not mindful of the Rock of their strength, planting pleasant plants and setting it with strange slips. Verse 11 then describes the outcome of their farming. It is clearly the time of trouble we have already been hearing about.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Why the Pain Is Called "Incurable"

The ESV calls the pain of that day "incurable." Older translations read "desperate sorrow." One writer compares how older translators handled the same Hebrew word elsewhere in the Old Testament.

The word here translated "desperately wicked" is, in the authorised version of Isaiah 17:11, rendered "desperate," and in Jeremiah 17:16, "woeful." Everywhere else our Bible translates it "incurable" — as in Job 34:6, Jeremiah 15:18 and Micah 1:9. The one exception is 2 Samuel 12:15, where a different form occurs and our Bible gives "and it was very sick."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The grief of that day is not a passing disappointment. It is a wound no human remedy reaches.

Planting in the Land Without Faith

One writer recounts a conversation at a wine merchant's window, and what the labels on the bottles proved.

God drove the Jews out of their land and withdrew the latter rain, reducing the country to barrenness, because they refused their Messiah… A Christian friend told an unbeliever he would show him striking proof that Scripture is true. He took him to a wine merchant's window and pointed to a row of bottles. Their labels said the wine came from grapes grown in Palestine, from slips imported from Spain. These labels proved four things. (1) Foreign slips would not have been needed unless barrenness had overtaken the land. (2) Foreign slips would not have been imported unless the rainfall had improved and the sterility had been overcome. (3) The wonderful inspiration of God's word, that could prophesy this 2,500 years ago. (4) God's present ordering and arranging. Man could not arrange a return of the latter rain. God alone could do that.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

What the Harvest Day Will Bring

The same writer holds that part of this prophecy is still future, and that the sorrow has a purpose beyond itself.

Part of the prophecy still has to be fulfilled. It speaks of the prosperity of the country at the beginning, and of the glad hopes of the settlers, who settle in the land promised to Abraham without Abraham's faith. Their hopes, however, will be dashed to the ground when the day of the great tribulation bursts upon them. That is the time of "Jacob's trouble," or, as our verse phrases it, "the day of grief and of desperate sorrow." … Come it must, for only in that way will the Jew be finally humbled and blessed. Israel can only come into the land of her possession through purification, repentance, and acknowledging their Messiah, our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Forgot. The harvest fails for a moral reason, not a farming one. They forgot the God of their salvation and the Rock of their strength.

- Planted. Hard work follows the forgetting: plantations laid out, foreign vine cuttings brought in, a land once barren made to produce again.

- Flourished. Growth comes fast, and it is real. Writers point to modern colonies, imported slips and returning rain as proof that God's word holds good.

- Failed. The harvest day brings grief beyond any human fix. The ESV calls that pain "incurable"; it is the time of Jacob's trouble.

- Saved. The sorrow is the road, not the end. Only through that humbling does Israel come to repentance and to their Messiah.