The vision of Isaiah the son of Amos, which he saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem in the days of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, Hezekiah, kings of Judah.
The opening line of Isaiah is a title page: a man, a message, a subject, and a span of years. It tells us that what follows was seen, not thought up. And it ties the whole prophecy to one people at one time.
This first verse is not the heading of chapter one only. It covers the whole collection. Later prophecies in the book carry their own dates.
The title... gives unity to the entire collection, unlike the particular dates found in Isaiah 6:1; 7:1; 14:28; 20:1. In keeping with all this, the first chapter is more general in character than any other in the book. With deep feeling it charges the people, the capital and the sanctuary with the worst ingratitude.
Two Hebrew words stand behind the office. Each says something different about the prophet.
The word translated "prophet" in the Old Testament comes from a word meaning "bubbling or pouring forth." It points to God's action in inspiring him. "Seer" points to the vision that marked such a man out. The meaning this word carries in Scripture rises far above its ordinary use among the nations, just as the living and true God rises above the demons. Those demons worked behind the idols that the nations worshipped and their prophets interpreted.
Some have tried to soften "vision" into human intuition. One writer answers with a simple test:
Intuition, as the word is normally used, does not mean the same thing as "vision" in the prophets. Did Nahum pour out the burden of Nineveh by intuition? Did Isaiah give his predictions about God's people and the nations by intuition?
The verse gives his father's name and almost nothing else. The book adds little more, though his two sons carried names that were messages.
We know very little about his personal life. Jewish tradition claims he was related to King Uzziah. He must have come from a leading family, since he could go in freely before the kings of Judah, Ahaz and Hezekiah, and likely the others too. The book tells us he was married. He had two sons who bore prophetic names. The first was Shear-Jashub ("a remnant shall return"), which showed that God would leave a remnant of His people. The second was Maher-shalal-hash-baz, which means "hurrying to the spoil, rushing to the prey" — a prophecy of the coming, threatening invasion by Assyria.
His own name carries the theme of the book, and explains the place it holds in the rest of Scripture:
The name Isaiah means "Jehovah saves" or "Jehovah is salvation." He has rightly been called the prophet of the gospel. The New Testament quotes this great book directly, and hints at it, more often than any other prophetic book.
The verse names its own subject. That settles a long-running question about how to read the book.
Some people say that the prophet Isaiah is full of the Church of God... But to give even a shadow of proof for this, they take "Jerusalem" to mean the Church, the "house of David" to mean the Church, "Zion" to mean the Church, and I don't know what else to mean the Church. As far as I can see, they have no authority at all for doing so. But the book of Isaiah is headed with the words "concerning Judah and Jerusalem." So while the Holy Spirit, in writing the Scriptures, may weave in most precious truths that we can now take up and use for our own building up, it is clear that the plain teaching of these Scriptures refers to the nation and people of Israel, and not to the Church of God.
Naming Judah does not shrink the prophecy to one tribe. Jerusalem was the capital of all the tribes, so God speaks past the split:
Chapter 1:1 tells us Isaiah's vision concerns Judah and Jerusalem. Since Jerusalem is the true capital of all the tribes, God brushes aside the division that had happened. Again and again He prophesies of Israel's glory — and Israel here covers the whole twelve tribes.
The four reigns do more than date the book. Good kings ruled — yet read what the prophet says about the people.
The first verse shows that Isaiah's ministry was in the southern kingdom and ran through four reigns. Three of the kings named did mostly what was right, and one of them stood out. Only one — Ahaz — turned aside and did evil. Yet the prophet's opening words reveal a sad state of departure and rebellion among the people... They were sinful and marked by iniquity, evil-doing, corruption and alienation. All this went on while God-fearing kings were on the throne.
- Vision. The book opens with something seen, not reasoned out. God gave the seer what no intuition could supply.
- Man. Scripture tells us little about Isaiah, son of Amoz. Even his sons' names carry the message.
- Name. "Jehovah is salvation" — the name spells out the theme. No other prophecy is quoted so often in the New Testament.
- Scope. The subject is Judah and Jerusalem. Reading the church into Zion or the house of David has no warrant here.
- Times. Four reigns, three of them mostly good — yet the people rebelled. A good throne cannot make a faithful heart.
Hear, [ye] heavens, and give ear, [thou] earth! for Jehovah hath spoken I have nourished and brought up children; and they have rebelled against me.
Isaiah's book opens with a courtroom, not a prediction. God calls heaven and earth to listen while He describes the children He raised. The charge is not one scandal. It is settled ingratitude — and the verse asks why a people God nourished should end up like this.
The verse names its source before it names the crime. This is not Isaiah's opinion. Every prophet spoke with the same high authority, and Isaiah stands first in the line.
The prophets all alike spoke with the highest authority. Take the first of them: "Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth; for the LORD has spoken" (Isa. 1:2).
Isaiah did not invent this opening. Moses used the same call at the start of his last song, and Isaiah takes it up again.
So Moses, who gave the law, called the heavens and the earth to listen in his song (Deut. 32:1). He proclaimed the name of Jehovah. He also set before the people a searching look into the future, which by divine power took in the failure and ruin of Israel… Here it is the dark picture of their sins. What a protest from God and for God! Heaven and earth are summoned to hear the complaint against His people.
Another writer points to what that call says about the size of the message.
Moses began his song by calling heaven and earth to hear the words of his mouth. What he was about to say concerned indeed heaven and earth. Isaiah too began his book with the same call (Isa. 1:2).
The word "children" carries weight. It names a real bond between God and a whole nation. Writers also mark how that bond differs from being born of God.
As a nation, God gave special care to His people Israel. He nourished them and protected them. He disciplined them for their sins, and forgave them when they turned back to Him. Despite all God's goodness and care, Israel rebelled against His authority and worshipped idols… All people are God's offspring (Acts 17:29), since we all come from Adam, into whom God breathed the breath of life. But that is very different from the new birth, which brings us into God's family as His children.
The charge names no single reign. Isaiah served under four kings, and some of them were good. The problem was never one bad season.
The opening appeal of the prophet is to the conscience. Every reader can see it. Through Isaiah, Jehovah charges His people with ungrateful, enormous, and lasting rebellion. It is all the worse because the charge is plainly general… True, no one can point to one particular period, or to one outbreak of unusually vicious evil. Even that, however sad, would not be as hopeless as a settled state of alienation.
The timing sharpens it further. The rot described here was not the fruit of a wicked court.
Three of the kings mentioned did mostly what was right, and one of them stood out. Only one — Ahaz — turned aside and did evil. Yet the prophet's opening words reveal a sad state of departure and rebellion among the people… They were sinful and marked by iniquity, evil-doing, corruption, and alienation. All this went on while God-fearing kings were on the throne.
Later in the book, faith reaches back to this verse. The relationship the rebellion broke becomes the ground of the prophet's appeal.
The very first words of Isaiah's prophecy were, "The LORD has spoken: 'Children have I reared and brought up, but they have rebelled against me.'" So then, Jehovah had taken the place of Father to Israel. The prophet's faith counted on that, and he based his appeal on it.
God says this about Himself. So a parent grieving over a wayward child is not describing anything God has not felt.
He has a Father's heart, He knows what it is to bring up children; as we read in Isaiah 1:2: "Children have I reared and brought up, but they have rebelled against me." He knows every feeling that stirs a parent's heart.
- Spoken — The verse rests on the words "the LORD has spoken." The prophets claimed no authority of their own. Isaiah leads that line.
- Reared — God's complaint starts with His own kindness. He nourished and brought up a whole nation, and that care shows how deep the ingratitude runs.
- Heard — God calls heaven and earth to listen, as Moses did in his song. The failure of God's people is too large a matter for Israel alone.
- Rebelled — The charge is general, not tied to one bad king. The decay ran on while God-fearing kings reigned. That marks settled alienation, not a passing slip.
- Reclaimed — The Father-relationship the rebellion insulted is the ground Isaiah later pleads on. It also tells every grieving parent that God has felt what they feel.
The ox knoweth his owner, and the ass his master's crib; Israel doth not know, my people hath no intelligence.
God opens His case against His people by calling heaven and earth to listen, then points them to their own farmyard for the proof. The animals know who owns and feeds them; the people God calls His own do not.
The complaint follows a pattern set long before. What makes the charge sting is the contrast drawn from the stable.
So the law-giver in his song (Deuteronomy 32:1) called the heavens and the earth to give ear, as he proclaimed the name of the LORD. … Heaven and earth are summoned to hear the complaint against His people. The dullest of their own beasts of burden put them to shame. God's correction did as little good as His gracious training.
The picture fits people who lived with livestock. For the lesson, God sends them to the yard behind their own house.
Isaiah 1:3 was addressed to a people of pastoral habits. It was not yet the day of great manufacturing cities. Every man owned oxen and donkeys. So the LORD tells His people to go to their own stockyards and learn a lesson there. "The ox knows its owner, and the donkey its master's crib, but Israel does not know, my people do not understand." These are not the most intelligent farm animals. Even so, they are a rebuke to man.
Knowing, in this verse, means knowing whose you are. Man's failure there comes from unbelief, not from a weak mind.
These beasts at least know who they belong to. Man does not: in the stupidity of his unbelief he fails to see that his owner and master is God.
The crib is the feeding trough, and that is the second half of the rebuke. It starts at the dinner table and does not stop there.
The donkey knows who feeds it, "but my people do not understand." The beast knows whose hand its good things come from, but not man! Yet, as Paul told the men of Lystra in Acts 14:17, God has never left Himself without witness. He has done men good, giving rain from heaven and fruitful seasons, filling men's hearts with food and gladness. But do men acknowledge His hand? … If men fail to own God in His lesser gifts, what is their attitude toward the overwhelming gift of His Son? Is Christ valued?
Isaiah's people kept up their religion. It did not fool God. The ignorance had further to fall — and even so, it does not get the last word.
"Israel does not know, my people do not understand," is the LORD's weighty conclusion. When it comes to grateful recognition of the hand that fed them, He finds the children of His covenant lower than the beasts that perish (Isaiah 1). … He tests hearts. He saw that they did not really know Him just as clearly when they were diligently waiting in His courts as when they openly paraded their shame. … This national ignorance reached its lowest depth when, not knowing what they did, they crucified the Son of God. … Yet God has promised and provided this for the house of Israel and the house of Judah: in the days to come, all that nation, from the smallest to the greatest, shall truly know the LORD.
The charge did not end with Isaiah's generation. Later, God's own Son stood among the people.
Isaiah, in his day, said, "The ox knows its owner, and the donkey its master's crib, but Israel does not know." That word might now be said with far greater emphasis. Jesus the Son of God was among them. Did they know Him? They did not. They had not the sense of a donkey!
- Know — the courtroom. God calls heaven and earth as witnesses. The verdict comes from the cattle shed: the dullest beasts of burden put God's people to shame.
- Know — the owner. The animal has grasped one thing man misses: whose he is. Man's failure is not weak intelligence but unbelief about his own Owner and Master.
- Know — the crib. The donkey traces its food to a hand. Rain and fruitful seasons are God's standing witness. Will a man who never thanks Him for a meal value the gift of His Son?
- Know — under religion. The nation was busy in God's courts and still did not know Him. That ignorance was of the heart, and it sank lowest when they crucified the Son of God.
- Know — the promise. The God who brings the charge also pledges the cure. A day is coming when all that nation, from the least to the greatest, will truly know the LORD.
Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that corrupt themselves! They have forsaken Jehovah; they have despised the Holy One of Israel; they are turned away backward.
God's opening words through Isaiah are not about one bad king or one bad year. They are a verdict on a whole people He had raised as His own children. The charge comes in layers: what they are, what they did, and who they turned their backs on. The last name in that list, the Holy One of Israel, carries the answer as well as the accusation.
The charge is broad on purpose. It does not point to one moment of unusual wickedness. One writer says this makes it worse, not milder:
Everyone who reads Isaiah can see that through him the LORD charges His people with ungrateful, huge, and lasting rebellion. It is all the worse because the charge is plainly general... True, no one can point to one particular period, or to one outbreak of unusually vicious sin. But even that, however sad, would not be as hopeless as a settled state of alienation. Their corruption went hand in hand with the contempt they showed to Him Who had always watched over them with a patience and tender mercy as perfect as His righteousness.
Two verses earlier God calls them children He nourished and brought up. Verse 4 shows what those children became. One writer marks the gap between a family name and a family likeness:
As a nation, God gave His people Israel special care. He nourished and protected them, disciplined them for their sins, and forgave them when they turned to Him in repentance. Despite all God's goodness and care, Israel rebelled against His authority and gave their worship to idols. They were "offspring of evildoers, children who deal corruptly" (verse 4). These are plainly not the marks of true children of God, of those who are born of God and belong to His family.
God chooses one name for Himself here. It measures the distance between Him and what they had become:
The name "Holy One of Israel" implies that the God of Israel is completely separated from all evil, for His eyes are too pure to look at evil. The seraphim say the same when they call out before His throne: "Holy, holy, holy is the LORD of hosts."
That title is Isaiah's signature name for God, and it does not stay on the side of judgment only:
Isaiah calls Him "the Holy One of Israel" all through the book. This title of the Lord, who deals with His people in judgment and in mercy, appears twenty-five times in Isaiah... The Holy One of Israel is the LORD; He is the Redeemer of His people. "Our Redeemer—the LORD of hosts is his name—is the Holy One of Israel" (47:4).
They had turned away, and that drift had a history behind it. One writer sets the sigh in this verse against the height Israel once stood at:
In Isaiah's day we hear the sigh of Israel's God... The foolish people threw away all they enjoyed in the golden days of Solomon, so that they might "enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin."
The verse is easy to read as a report on one unusually bad nation. One writer presses it further:
Do not think, dear reader, that all this was written only as the history of one unusually corrupt people. Oh no; by it God wants to show us what the human heart is — my heart, your heart — even when God has poured out all His care on us. The human heart is completely corrupt; good does not exist in it; and so it is impossible to get any good out of it.
Isaiah's opening charge is severe. It is not God's last word to this nation:
The first chapter gives a true picture of Israel as a sinful nation, weighed down with sin (Isa. 1:4). Despite all their sins, God will step in to purge away their dross and take away all their sin: "Zion shall be redeemed by justice, and those in her who repent, by righteousness" (Isa. 1:25-27).
- Nourished — God raised them as children and cared for them without a break. The charge stands against the background of that kindness.
- Corrupted — the family name stayed, but the family likeness was gone. Offspring of evildoers is not what a child of God looks like.
- Provoked — they offended the Holy One, who is completely separated from all evil. That is why sin against Him cannot be waved through.
- Backward — this is not one bad moment but a settled state of alienation. A slow, steady slide is more serious than a single outbreak of wickedness.
- Redeemed — the title that condemns them, Holy One of Israel, is also Isaiah's name for their Redeemer. The chapter that opens with this charge ends with Zion redeemed.
Why should ye be smitten any more? ye will revolt more and more the whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint.
Isaiah opens with a question from God, not a verdict, put to a people already covered in the marks of His discipline. Why keep striking them, when every blow has only brought more rebellion?
The prophecy does not begin with prediction. It opens with God pleading, and His charge covers the whole nation, not one bad reign.
The opening appeal of the prophet is to the conscience. No reader can avoid seeing that through Isaiah the Lord charges His people with ungrateful, enormous, and persistent rebellion. It is all the more terrible because it is plainly general... In themselves they were hopelessly evil... One outbreak of unusually vicious evil, however sad, would not be as desperate as a continuous state of alienation. Their corruption went hand in hand with contempt for Him. He had always watched over them with a patience and tender mercy as perfect as His righteousness. Yet each time He disciplined them, they revolted more.
God had tried two things with this people: gentle training and hard discipline. Kelly sets the results side by side.
The dullest of their own beasts of burden put them to shame. God's chastenings were as useless as His gracious training. The nation as a body was diseased and repulsive from head to foot. Medicine and treatment were completely ignored.
That patience ran a long time first. In governing the nation, God forgave again and again, "till He was compelled to judge, and say 'why should you be stricken any more?'" One writer names the pattern that drained the discipline of all effect: "restoration after chastisement only gave them further opportunity for sin until the cup ran over" (The Bible Treasury).
The image runs from the crown down. Sickness at the top, weakness at the centre, and in the next verse open wounds everywhere. One writer names the disease, and the only One who can cure it.
Long before, the Spirit of God had made known the leprous condition of the people... This describes the leper perfectly: wounds, bruises and sores, as he wanders as an outcast toward even greater suffering. Here then Israel's Messiah, the same who spoke in Exodus, "I am the Lord, your Healer," meets His poor, unclean people.
Kelly names what makes the case so grave. Israel "felt nothing about their disgusting wounds and deadly disease, suffered at the hands of the One Who loved them. He was ready to heal, but their hard indifference treated His readiness as worthless" (William Kelly).
Commentators read the head-to-foot sweep as more than rhetoric. It measures how far the damage reaches.
The Holy Spirit is dealing with the question of sin, that evil nature which belongs to the whole race of Adam. Sin does not affect us only in part... The cross has brought this fully to light. Before the cross the Lord could give the law its full moral force as forbidding certain acts... but the cross has shown that man's whole condition is sinful. Who can read words like "Away with this Man!" and "Crucify Him!" and not feel that the cross brought out the true nature of sin as the law never could?
If the disease runs this deep, more punishment cannot cure it. One writer says so plainly, then names the only power that can:
The creature that has proved itself able to withstand such arguments and persuasions as these cases show, has proved itself to be beyond the reach of all moral influence. Hell itself would not cure him or deter him. Man is incorrigible and incurable. Again, we may say with Isaiah, "Why should you be stricken any more? you will revolt more and more." Sovereign grace and power must come in. If God does not have a seed, it will all be Sodom.
A note on wording: these writers quote an older translation, which reads the second line as a statement — "you will revolt more and more" — where the ESV asks a second question. Bellett's closing words also point forward in the chapter. The prophet who calls the nation hopeless records the mercy that kept it alive: God left a small remnant, or Israel would have gone the way of Sodom and Gomorrah (An Outline of Sound Words).
- Diagnosis. God is reasoning with a conscience here, not just passing sentence. His complaint is settled, nationwide rebellion, not one bad season.
- Depth. Sick head, faint heart, no sound spot from sole to crown — the disease is the whole man, not a damaged part of him.
- Deadlock. God tried kindness and correction. Israel refused both. More blows would only bring more revolt, so the striking stops.
- Deliverance. Man is beyond the reach of pressure, so only sovereign grace can act. The Healer Himself comes to meet the leprous nation.
- Discipline. God had forgiven again and again until the cup ran over, which is the warning inside the mercy: patience has a limit.
From the sole of the foot even unto the head there is no soundness in him; wounds, and weals, and open sores they have not been dressed, nor bound up, nor mollified with oil.
Isaiah opens by putting God's people under a doctor's examination. The report finds one wound running from head to foot, and nobody treating it — so who can heal such a case?
The prophet is not describing a nation with trouble in a few places. He describes a patient with nothing healthy left, and with sores nobody has treated.
God's chastenings were as useless as His gracious training. The whole nation was diseased and loathsome from head to foot. No one gave it medicine or treatment.
God has already struck, and striking again would achieve nothing. Yet the chapter does not end in despair.
Isaiah 1 begins with a testimony to the sad condition of the people. They were all wounds and corruption. It was useless to chastise them any more. Their ceremonies were an abomination to Jehovah. He desired righteousness. Still, the prophecy calls the people to repentance, and promises that blessing will follow it.
The verse names three treatments the wounds never got: pressing out, binding up, softening with oil. Oil was the ordinary medicine of the day.
People applied it to wounds or bruises to soothe them. Isa. 1:6.
So the tragedy is not only the disease but the refusal of treatment, offered by the very One whose hand had wounded them.
Israel felt nothing of their loathsome wounds and fatal disease, which came from the hand of Him who loved them. Their callous indifference treated His readiness to heal as nothing.
The picture reaches past one nation to fallen human nature.
Suppose there had been one string in man's fallen nature that could have answered to God's touch. He would have developed eternal harmonies out of that string. Suppose there had been any fibre in what is born of the flesh that was untainted and holy and subject to the will of God. In that fibre there would have been a basis of life, and God's cultivation would have grown it into a glorious kingdom for Him. But there was none.
Others aim the verse straight at the reader.
You don't like it, but the fact remains, you are a poor, loathsome leper in God's sight. You don't believe it; that does not alter the fact. From the crown of your head to the soles of your feet there is not one sound spot about you.
One story turns the verse around. A traveller lies half dead on the road, and a Samaritan does what Isaiah says nobody did: he binds the wounds and pours on oil.
Here is a helpless man with nothing to commend him. He has no power even to resist. "But a Samaritan, as he journeyed, came to where he was, and when he saw him, he had compassion. He went to him and bound up his wounds, pouring on oil and wine." That is the way of the Lord's love to the needy one. He saw what man was in himself, and it brought Him to the cross. He came to bring life and comfort to the needy on earth, pouring oil and wine into our death wounds, and recovering us from our lost condition. The needy one is cured where he suffered.
So the verse leaves a person with two needs at once. One Person meets both.
Our Lord's words in Luke 5:31-32 are familiar to all: "Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. I have not come to call the righteous but sinners to repentance." Man is here shown to be both diseased and guilty. As the first, he needs healing; as the second, he needs pardon. The Son of God is both Physician and Saviour, and besides Him there is no other.
- Diagnosis — The report is total, not partial: no sound spot from sole to head, with the sores left open.
- Discipline — Blows had already fallen and achieved nothing, so more striking was pointless.
- Neglect — Nobody pressed out, bound up or softened the wounds with oil. Yet the One who wounded them stood ready to heal.
- Depth — Fallen nature keeps no untainted fibre for God to build a recovery on.
- Doctor — Christ does what Israel left undone. He pours in the oil and binds the wounds: Physician for the disease, Saviour for the guilt.
Your country is desolate; your cities are burned with fire; your land, strangers eat it up in your presence, and it is desolate, as overthrown by strangers.
Verse 7 lays out the evidence against God's people: fields stripped, towns burned, foreigners feeding off the land while the owners stand and watch. The question the verse forces is not who did the damage, but why God let it happen — and whether anything is left.
The verse moves from open country to the cities. One writer traces the same movement, ending with Zion left unprotected.
The nation as a body was diseased and sickening from head to foot, and no one gave it any treatment. Country and town were a waste and a scene of destruction. Strangers ate up the ground. The daughter of Zion no longer enjoyed that holy fortress. She was left in distress and alone, like a city under siege.
A ruined land was never meant to be normal for Israel. The ruin said something about the people, not about the soil.
Look at famine in that land which the Lord had promised would flow with milk and honey for His chosen people! But this was sure proof that His chosen people had been unfaithful. So all this evil state — the sorrows of the land and the captivity of her children — shows Israel as they now are, suffering for their unfaithfulness under the righteous displeasure of the Lord. Their cities are ruined and empty of people. The land is completely desolate. The Lord has removed her children far away, and there is a great forsaking in the middle of the land. Only one reason explains their sorrows in every period.
The burned cities were God's discipline. But notice what that discipline produced.
All this had brought upon them the heavy hand of God in discipline and disaster, yet without any reforming effect, as verses 5-9 show. Vivid word pictures bring home to the people their terrible state.
The same writer says this pattern holds everywhere. Punishment on its own softens no one.
We never find that God's dealings in judgment change people for the better. In Egypt God dealt with Pharaoh, increasing the severity of His strokes. Was his heart softened? No, it was hardened.
Long before Isaiah, Moses set out what would follow if Israel refused to listen.
In Deuteronomy 28 Moses warns Israel in great detail and with great seriousness. If they would not listen to His voice, the Lord would send curses on them. Those curses would consume Israel off the land and chase them elsewhere, so that they became a horror, a proverb and a byword among all nations. In Deuteronomy 29 Moses pictures all the nations asking why the Lord had made the holy land such a waste, and why the anger was so fierce. The answer is this: Israel abandoned the covenant of the Lord for false gods, so the curse fell, and He uprooted them from their land in great anger.
The desolation described here did not stay in Isaiah's century either.
Cities would be ruined and the place of worship destroyed. The land would become so desolate that even their enemies would be shocked. The people of Israel would be scattered among the nations. They would not lose their identity, but they would be persecuted without mercy wherever they went. All this has taken place.
One thing alone kept the ruin from being total, and it was not Israel's strength.
Though He struck them, they were only hardened, and rebelled more and more. Outward disasters achieved nothing. He had allowed things to go so far that only His mercy held back a destruction as merciless as the one that fell on the doomed cities, Sodom and Gomorrah. How very few were left!
One writer sees the same pattern repeating long after Isaiah.
This is always God's way. Again and again in the past He had kept a small remnant for Himself while most people turned away. He has done so through the church's history. He is doing so today.
The wasted land is not the last word. The chapter sets out two ways blessing could come, and says which one will happen.
Still, the people are called to repentance, and promised that blessing would follow it. That is the place prophecy gives them. But God knew the people: they and their rulers were wicked and corrupt. So God declares what will happen. He will carry out judgment, and so cleanse the people and set up blessing again. Two great principles are laid down. Blessing is offered on repentance; but in fact blessing will be brought in by judgment.
- Ruin. The picture runs from open country to city walls. Outsiders eat up the farmland, towns burn, and Zion is left alone like a place under siege.
- Reason. God promised Israel milk and honey. A desolate land was proof of unfaithfulness, and one reason alone explains Israel's sorrows in every period.
- Refusal. The blows were God's discipline, but they reformed no one. As with Pharaoh, harder strokes only hardened the heart.
- Remnant. The ruin stopped short of Sodom's fate for one reason: God's mercy held it back, and He always keeps a small remnant for Himself.
- Restoration. Blessing is offered on repentance. But Isaiah 1 says it will come the other way — through judgment that cleanses.
And the daughter of Zion is left, as a booth in a vineyard, as a night-lodge in a cucumber-garden, as a besieged city.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Unless Jehovah of hosts had left us a very small residue, we should have been as Sodom, we should have been like unto Gomorrah.
Isaiah opens his book with a nation beaten, burned and nearly emptied. Then he stops to say why anything is left at all — and the answer is about God, not about the survivors.
One commentator shows how narrow the escape was:
It grieved the LORD at His heart to see how great man's wickedness was in the earth, and to wipe him off the face of the ground. What was it now for Him to give up like this on the chosen people, full of disease and wounds? For though He struck them, they were only hardened, and rebelled more and more. Outward disasters failed completely. Yet He had let matters go so far that only His mercy held back destruction. It would have been as complete as the destruction that fell on the doomed cities, Sodom and Gomorrah. How very small the remnant!
The idea of a remnant — the few God leaves — starts where punishment has already failed:
It rests on this: man cannot be corrected. Man may smart and cry out under the rod, but he goes back to his badness again and again. The book of Judges illustrates this. And Isaiah 1 shows us that the idea of a remnant, as I have said, comes out of this. For the prophet there tells us that those brought up as loved children had rebelled. Afterwards, punished as disobedient children, they refused to repent. They were incorrigible. Whether played happy music or sad, they had no answer. And on this the Lord has only to act on the sovereignty of grace, or on the principle of a remnant.
Isaiah names God by a title, and that title first appears at a low point in Israel's story:
We do not meet with this name until 1 Samuel 1:3. It came in with prophetic testimony, faith taking hold of the LORD's glory when Israel had corrupted themselves and were in a weak and low state. … The same title occurs in the New Testament as the LORD OF SABAOTH, Romans 9:29 (in a quotation from Isaiah 1:9), and James 5:4.
Paul later quotes this verse and changes one word. Where Isaiah says a very small remnant, Paul says a seed:
Verse 29 [of Romans 9] quotes an earlier prophecy of Isaiah — from Isaiah 1:9, confirming the truth of mercy for a remnant only. Here "a seed" is spoken of — a small part. The verse quoted uses the term "a very small remnant." If the Lord had not preserved this feeble seed, Israel's destruction would have been as complete as that of Sodom and Gomorrah.
The whole weight falls on what God did, not on what the survivors were.
One writer traces this remnant forward to the nation it will become:
The true Israel, or the Israel of God, has at all times been only a remnant inside a nation that had turned away. And the true Israel will still be only a remnant when Israel becomes a nation again, settled once more in the land of their fathers. This last remnant will become the seed of the future nation, the "all Israel," which is to be saved (Romans 11:26). As it is written, "The least one shall become a clan, and the smallest one a mighty nation."
(The closing line is quoted here in the ESV; older versions read "a little one shall become a thousand, and a small one a strong nation.")
One writer draws the line straight to the reader's own day:
Verse 9 reveals that only a small remnant existed that God could recognise. Had that remnant not been there, a judgment like that of Sodom and Gomorrah would have fallen on them. This is always God's way. Again and again in the past He had kept a small remnant for Himself in the middle of general departure. He has done so through the church's history. He is doing so today.
- Cause — Judgment had already fallen and reformed no one. The people would not be corrected, so God worked by grace, through a remnant.
- Gift — Nothing in the survivors explains their survival. God left them; without that, the ruin would have been as complete as Sodom's.
- Name — The title "the LORD of hosts" fits this moment. It is faith taking hold of God's glory when His people are weakest.
- Reach — Paul calls what God leaves a seed. The smallest remnant is the start of the nation yet to be saved.
- Result — This is God's constant method, not a one-off rescue. He has kept a remnant in every era of departure, and He does so still.
Hear the word of Jehovah, rulers of Sodom; give ear unto the law of our God, people of Gomorrah!
God gives Judah's leaders the names of two cities He had wiped out, then tells them to listen. The rest of the chapter answers the question this raises: how can God call a people busy with sacrifices and feasts Sodom?
The name is not about where they came from. It describes what they had become. One commentator explains a similar charge in Ezekiel:
The chosen people were meant and bound to displace the nations that the land spat out because of their abominations. So no figure could cut deeper than the one that traces the origin and birth of Jerusalem to Canaan, with the Amorite for a father and the Hittite for a mother. It is of course moral, not historical: so Isaiah branded the rulers as "of Sodom," and the people as "of Gomorrah."
The name carries a warning with it:
Scripture treats Sodom as a symbol of wickedness. Isaiah calls the heads of Judah the "rulers of Sodom." … The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah stands as a warning to sinners of judgments to come. It was both sudden and complete.
They were not merely close to Sodom's fate. This verse says they already shared Sodom's character. The shift is from the punishment to the behaviour:
As to Israel, they were more guilty than the heathen, as bad as the worst. So it is no longer the doom, but the abominations of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Mercy had held back the fire; it had not changed the men.
Only the mercy of the LORD kept them from the doom of Sodom. In character they were already Sodom. So their sacrifices, feasts and assemblies were all the more hateful to Him. He felt that their feet profaned His courts, and He refused to hear their many prayers.
God is not addressing pagans or careless people here. The verses that follow show who is standing there:
Verse 10 has a solemn voice for us. The prophet compares the religious leaders of his day to the rulers and people of those wicked cities God destroyed centuries before. We say religious leaders because of the verses that follow. There they and the people keep the ritual of Judaism with zeal and exact care. What were they doing? They were offering sacrifices and burnt offerings. They brought offerings and incense. They kept new moons, sabbaths, appointed feasts and assemblies, and spread out their hands with many prayers. Were these things not right, as ordered through Moses? Yes, they were. Yet God declared all of it a weariness to Him and detestable in His sight. As verses 16 and 17 show, their careful ritual was only a decent outside covering a mass of moral evil and uncleanness. This state of things later grew into the religion of the Pharisees, which our Lord denounced so sharply.
Their worship looked right from the outside. The fault lay in the worshippers:
There was much piety according to the world. They kept up a round of religious forms to worship God. They never noticed the lack of life, faithfulness and purity that marked them (v. 10–13). Having a form of godliness, they had denied its power. … The multitude of sacrifices did not make their ways true in relation to God. So the very things God had set up or commanded became things He hated in their hands. The reason was that the conscience of His people did not match His mind.
He calls them Sodom — and then asks them to hear. That is not the end of the conversation but the start of one:
Yet the LORD stoops to call them to repentance and to the fruits that suit it. … God can tolerate iniquity nowhere, least of all in His people. They must therefore stop doing evil and learn to do good, showing it in the ways of ordinary life. But He adds with it a gracious invitation that He and they should reason together. They would soon find where the fault lay, and who has the grace that is willing to wash the foulest clean.
(ESV reads "the teaching of our God" here. Older translations have "law," and the commentators quote it that way.)
- Named. God names Judah's leaders after two destroyed cities. The name describes their character, not their family line, and it is meant to cut.
- Spared. Mercy had kept them from Sodom's doom, yet they had Sodom's ways already. Escaping the fire had not changed them.
- Exposed. God addressed the men who kept the ritual most carefully. Their offerings, feasts and long prayers became the evidence against them.
- Covered. Their careful ritual was a decent outside over moral evil. So God came to hate what He Himself had commanded, because the conscience behind it was wrong.
- Summoned. Even here He tells them to listen. He calls for repentance shown in ordinary life and invites them to reason with Him — with grace that washes the foulest clean.
To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith Jehovah. I am sated with burnt-offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and in the blood of bullocks, and of lambs, and of he-goats I take no pleasure.
These offerings were God's own. He commanded them through Moses. Now He says He has had enough of them. So the question is not whether ritual is right. It is what makes ritual worthless in God's eyes, and what He wants instead.
These people were not careless about religion. They were exact about it. That is what makes God's rejection so startling.
Verse 10 has a solemn voice to us. The prophet compares the religious leaders of his day to the rulers and people of wicked cities long since destroyed. We say "religious leaders" because of the verses that follow. There the leaders and the people keep the ritual of Judaism with zeal and exactness. What were they doing? They were offering sacrifices and burnt offerings. They brought offerings and incense. They kept new moons, sabbaths, appointed feasts and assemblies, and spread out their hands with many prayers. Were not these things right, as ordered through Moses? Yes, they were. Yet God called all this a weariness to Him, and hateful in His sight. Verses 16 and 17 show why. Their ceremonial exactness was only a decent outside, covering a mass of moral evil and uncleanness.
The animals named are not chosen at random. Isaiah's wording follows the law of Moses exactly.
Isaiah names the animals — rams, bulls, lambs and goats. In the original Hebrew all these names are masculine. Under the Mosaic Law, only the males were lawful for burnt offerings.
The fault was not in the ceremony but in the people carrying it out.
God says the same thing again and again in the prophets — the negative side. In Isaiah we have the added thought of a mere empty ritual, an outward form with no piety or devotedness in it. He says, "I do not delight in the blood of bulls." That was because those who brought them had no faith or piety.
Their standing before God did not soften the verdict; it sharpened it.
They did not lack religious zeal. They did look for a remedy for the obvious troubles of their day. But their remedies were worse than useless. Divine privileges only made their moral state more alarming and unbearable. Only the LORD's mercy kept them back from the doom of Sodom. In moral character they were already Sodom. So their sacrifices, feasts and assemblies were all the more hateful to Him. He felt that their feet profaned His courts, and He refused to hear their many prayers. There was no real repentance and no trembling at His word. Their religion was only a veil over utter, shameless wickedness.
One writer points to a second reason, deeper than the failure of the worshippers. It lies in the sacrifices themselves.
Yet in those countless altars and sacrifices God had no pleasure. He had no pleasure in Israel's offerings because of the character of those who brought them. Their hearts were not sincere. But the great, the basic reason for God's displeasure was this: the blood of bulls and goats could never take away sin… Then why were they offered? They were a shadow of good things to come, and they filled up the period of waiting until the Substance appeared. The substance is Christ; it was to Him that all these ancient sacrifices pointed.
God rejects their offerings, but He does not walk away.
Yet the LORD stoops to call them to repentance, and to the fruit that fits it… God will put up with evil nowhere, least of all in His people. They must therefore stop doing evil and learn to do good, proving it in the ways of ordinary life. But He adds a gracious invitation that He and they should reason together. Soon they would find where the fault lay, and with whom is the grace that is willing to wash the foulest clean.
This is not only about the past. It tests any worship offered today.
Does the Lord like a correct form and fine outward worship any better, if the heart is away from God? What if the hands are unclean with sin and the feet are not walking in the truth? The Lord says plainly, "To obey is better than sacrifice, and to listen than the fat of rams" (1 Sam. 15:22).
- Commanded. The rams, bulls, lambs and goats were God's own appointed offerings. Isaiah names them with the law's exact precision. The ritual was right.
- Corrupted. God took no pleasure in them, because of the character of those who brought them. It was an empty form with no faith behind it.
- Rejected. Privilege made it worse, not better. Their zeal became a veil over open wrongdoing, and God refused to hear their prayers.
- Repentance. What He asked for was moral reality — stop doing evil, learn to do good — with the invitation to come and reason with Him.
- Christ. Look past the worshippers to the sacrifices themselves. The blood of bulls and goats could never take away sin. They were a shadow until the Substance came — and the Substance is Christ.
When ye come to appear before me, who hath required this from your hand -- to tread my courts?
Isaiah's opening chapter shows a busy temple. The courts are full, the sacrifices keep coming, and God asks who asked for any of it. The worship itself was correct. The problem was the worshippers, whose lives said the opposite of their offerings.
The phrase about coming "to appear before me" is not general religious language. Isaiah is quoting the law's own wording for the three great feasts. His exact knowledge of the law runs through the whole passage.
When Isaiah says, "I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bulls, or of lambs, or of male goats" — in the original the names of the animals are all masculine. That is because the law of Moses allowed only males for burnt offerings. In the next verse, "When you come to appear before me," he uses the language of Exodus 34:24, about the three great feasts.
So they kept the right feasts at the right times, just as the law required. (The quotation above follows an older translation, which keeps the writer's point about the masculine names.)
God's complaint is not about the ritual but about the feet that bring it in.
They did not lack religious zeal. They even looked for a remedy for the obvious troubles of their day. But their remedies were worse than useless. Their divine privileges only made their moral state more shocking and unbearable. Only the Lord's mercy kept them from the doom of Sodom; morally they were Sodom already. So their sacrifices, feasts, and assemblies were all the more hateful to Him. He felt that their feet profaned His courts, and He refused to hear their many prayers. There was no real repentance, no trembling at His word, but a religious veil thrown over utter and shameless wickedness.
The hardest part is that God rejects a service He Himself set up.
The verses that follow show that the religious leaders and the people were zealous and exact observers of the ritual of Judaism. What were they doing? They were offering sacrifices and burnt offerings. They brought grain offerings and incense. They kept new moons, sabbaths, appointed feasts and assemblies, and spread out their hands in many prayers. Were not these things right, as ordered through Moses? Yes, they were. Yet God declared all of it a weariness to Him and an abomination in His sight. As verses 16 and 17 reveal, their exact ritual was only a decent outside covering a mass of moral evil and uncleanness.
Why did nobody in those crowded courts notice? Because the routine itself hid the problem from them.
There was much piety of a worldly kind. They kept up a round of religious forms to render worship to God, without noticing the lack of life, of faithfulness, and of purity that marked them. Having a show of godliness they had denied its power. They made long prayers at the street corners, but their conscience was not right with God. There was a moral blindness before the judicial blindness. Their many sacrifices did not make their ways true before God. So the very things God had set up and commanded became, in their hands, things He hated, because the conscience of His people was not in line with His mind.
What, then, does God want from a worshipper first?
Right ways in practical life are the garments that must first clothe those who are to be worshippers. The removal of evil and the pursuit of righteousness must mark those who offer their gifts to God. The fine white linen the priests wear for service is the symbol of this. Where obedience and practical righteousness are missing, God takes no pleasure in outward observance and lip worship. He desires mercy and not sacrifice, the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.
Correct form is no safer now than it was then.
Do you think the Lord likes a correct form and fine outward worship any better, if the heart is away from God? What if the hands are defiled with sin, and the feet are not walking in the truth? The Lord says plainly, "To obey is better than sacrifice, and to listen than the fat of rams." We hear people say, "You worship your way, and I worship mine; we all have a right to our own opinions." This is exactly what we do not have.
- Required. Isaiah borrows the law's own words for the great feasts. These people were keeping the calendar God gave them.
- Unrequired. God asks who asked for it. Feet that trample His courts profane them, and He refuses the offering along with the offerer.
- Hated. The very things God set up became hateful in their hands. The exact ritual was only a decent cover over moral evil.
- Unnoticed. Moral blindness came before judicial blindness. The round of forms hid their own lack of life and purity from them.
- Reordered. Right living is the clothing a worshipper puts on first. Without obedience, outward worship gives God no pleasure.
Bring no more vain oblations! Incense is an abomination unto me, -- new moon and sabbath, the calling of convocations -- wickedness and the solemn meeting I cannot bear.
God Himself commanded the offerings, the incense, the sabbaths and the assemblies — and here He calls them worthless. Can religious activity reach God while the lives behind it go on in evil?
Everything listed in this verse came out of the law of Moses. God is not rejecting worship people invented. He is rejecting the worship He set up Himself, because of the lives behind it.
They were offering sacrifices and burnt offerings. They were bringing grain offerings and incense. They were keeping new moons, sabbaths, appointed feasts and assemblies, and spreading out their hands in many prayers. Were not these things right, as ordered through Moses? Yes, they were. Yet God called all of it a weariness to Him and an abomination in His sight. The reason was simple: their exact ritual was only a respectable outside, covering a mass of moral evil and uncleanness.
Isaiah's list is not a random pile of religious words. Where the ESV has "vain offerings," older translations read "vain oblations." That is the grain offering, and Isaiah pairs each item exactly as the law does.
Isaiah not only refers to several Mosaic precepts, but shows the same exact knowledge. He puts the grain offering together with incense, because the grain offering required incense. See Leviticus 2:1, 16, and Leviticus 6:14-15. Next to new moons and sabbaths he mentions the calling of assemblies, or holy convocations. These convocations took place at those times, and at the great feasts too. See the whole of the twenty-third chapter of Leviticus.
Isaiah says God finds the incense an abomination. That word has a settled use in the Old Testament, and two things can pull God's own service into it.
The word "abomination" is used in the Old Testament for any iniquity as a holy God sees it. It also marks out what was unfit to be brought into the service of God — an animal with any kind of blemish offered as a sacrifice, for example. The service God had appointed became an abomination to Him when it sank into mere outward observance, or when it went along with iniquity. Isaiah 1:13; Proverbs 28:9.
The people were not careless. They were busy in religion — and that made their worship more offensive to God, not less.
Only Jehovah's mercy kept them back from the doom of Sodom. Morally they were already Sodom. So their sacrifices, feasts, and assemblies were all the more hateful to Jehovah. He felt that their feet profaned His courts, and He refused to hear their many prayers. There was no real repentance, no trembling at His word, only a religious veil over utter and shameless iniquity.
Translations differ on the last clause. An older reading runs, "It is iniquity, even the solemn day of assembly" — the gathering itself is the sin. The ESV reads, "I cannot endure iniquity and solemn assembly" — God will not hold the two together.
A settled round of religious forms can hide a person's real condition from himself.
They kept up a round of religious forms to worship God, and never saw how little life, faithfulness, and purity marked them. They had a show of godliness, but they had denied its power... There was a moral blindness before the judicial blindness... The very things God had set up or commanded became, in their hands, things He hated. The reason: the conscience of His people did not match His mind.
God rejects their worship, but He does not walk away. He asks for a changed life, and then makes an offer.
God can tolerate iniquity nowhere, least of all in His people. They must therefore cease from evil and learn to do well, proving it in ways of ordinary life. But He adds a gracious invitation that He and they should reason together. They would soon find where the fault lay, and with whom is the grace that is willing to wash the foulest clean.
The warning is not stuck in Isaiah's day. Our meetings, hymns and prayers can carry as little heart as their incense did.
We go, no doubt, week by week to the meetings. We sing our hymns, we read out of the Bible, we say our "Amen" at the end of each prayer — but is there any more heart in it than in the time of Malachi? "Bring no more vain oblations," although addressed to Judah in the days of Isaiah, could well be the message to many of us today.
- Commanded — God had ordered every item on this list through Moses. The fault was never in the form.
- Covered — Exact ritual became a cover for moral evil, a religious veil over shameless sin.
- Corrupted — Worship God appointed turns into an abomination when it sinks into outward form, or keeps company with sin.
- Concealed — Moral blindness came before judicial blindness. A full religious routine hid their own lack of life and purity from them.
- Cleansed — God's answer is not better ceremony. It is to stop the evil and learn to do good — and then His own invitation to reason together with the One willing to wash the foulest clean.
Your new moons and your set feasts my soul hateth they are a burden to me; I am wearied of bearing [them].
Judah's religious calendar was full — new moons, feasts, assemblies. God says He hates the whole round of it, and He is tired of carrying it. The shock is that these feasts were not pagan inventions. They were His own appointments.
Moses had commanded these observances, and the people kept them with care. That is what makes God's verdict so startling.
The religious leaders and the people were zealous and exact observers of the ritual of Judaism. What were they doing? They were offering sacrifices and burnt offerings, bringing offerings and incense, observing new moons, sabbaths, appointed feasts and assemblies, spreading out their hands with many prayers. Were not these things right, as ordered through Moses? Yes, they were. Yet God declared all this a weariness to Him and hateful in His sight. As verses 16 and 17 show, their exact ceremony was only a decent exterior covering a mass of moral evil and uncleanness.
If God ordered the feasts, how can He hate them? The answer lies in the conscience of the people, not in the ceremony.
There was much piety of a worldly kind. They kept up a round of religious forms to worship God. They never noticed the lack of life, faithfulness and purity that marked them (v. 10-13). Having a show of godliness they had denied its power... There was a moral blindness before the judicial blindness... The multitude of sacrifices did not make their ways true in relation to God. So (v. 14, 15) the very things God had set up or commanded became in their hands things He hated, because the conscience in His people was not according to His mind.
Their zeal did not soften the case against them; it sharpened it. Being God's people, with God's courts and God's ordinances, made their state worse, not better.
There was no lack of zeal in religion. They did look for a remedy for the obvious troubles of their day, but their remedies were worse than useless. Divine privileges only made their moral state more alarming and intolerable... their sacrifices, feasts, and assemblies were all the more hateful to Jehovah. He felt that their tread defiled His courts, and He refused to hear their many prayers. There was no real repentance, no trembling at His word. There was only a religious veil over open, shameless wickedness.
God does not call them My feasts here. He calls them yours. The same change of name shows up again later in Scripture.
In the Gospel of John, chapter 2:13, we read of the Passover, the first of "the feasts of Jehovah." But here it is not called the "Feast of Jehovah." It is "the Jews' Passover." In chapter 7:2 we read, "The Jews' Feast of Booths was at hand." "The Feasts of Jehovah" have become the "Feasts of the Jews." The outward form was there, but the Lord Jesus Christ, God's Son, had been rejected. What joy could God have in empty forms?
The same test falls on worship today. The question is not whether the form is correct, but whether heart, hands and feet match it.
Why was this? Was it not because the people kept the feasts in a formal, empty way, while they were defiled with sin and going on with evil?... Does the Lord like a correct form and fine outward worship any better, if the heart is away from God, the hands are defiled with sin, and the feet are not walking in the truth? The Lord says plainly, "To obey is better than sacrifice, and to listen than the fat of rams" (1 Sam. 15:22).
God does not end at hatred. Two verses later He gives the cure, and its order matters.
"Wash yourselves; make yourselves clean; remove the evil of your deeds from before my eyes; cease to do evil, learn to do good." There is the weighty matter. Have a good conscience before God: if not, you make yourselves blind before God blinds you. God distinguishes between actions. One cannot learn to do good before ceasing from evil. One cannot have the light in the conscience without first leaving what wounds the conscience.
- Commanded — the new moons, sabbaths and feasts were God's own arrangements through Moses. Isaiah's hearers kept them with care.
- Corrupted — the ritual was only a decent outside covering moral evil. They had a show of godliness, but denied its power.
- Hated — because the conscience was wrong, the things God Himself set up became hateful in their hands. They defiled His courts, and He closed His ear to their prayers.
- Disowned — God calls them your feasts, not His. In the Gospel of John the feasts of the LORD have become the feasts of the Jews.
- Cleansed — the cure follows at once: stop doing evil, then learn to do good. Obedience comes before sacrifice, and a clear conscience before acceptable worship.
And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you; yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear your hands are full of blood.
Judah kept the whole religious calendar — sacrifices, incense, new moons, feasts — and then lifted their hands to pray. God's answer is to look away, which raises two questions: why does He refuse to hear, and can that refusal ever end?
God Himself had commanded the worship listed in these verses. That is what makes His refusal so startling.
They were offering sacrifices and burnt offerings. They brought offerings and incense. They observed new moons, sabbaths, appointed feasts and assemblies, and spread out their hands with many prayers. Were not these things right, as ordered through Moses? Yes, they were. Yet God called all of it a weariness to Him and an abomination in His sight. The reason appears in verses 16 and 17: their ceremonial exactness was only a decent exterior covering a mass of moral evil and uncleanness.
Zeal was not their problem, and more praying did not help.
They did not lack zeal in religion. They did look for a remedy for the clear problems of their day, but their remedies were worse than useless. Divine privileges only made their moral state more alarming and intolerable. Only Jehovah's mercy kept them from the doom of Sodom; morally they were Sodom already. So their sacrifices, feasts, and assemblies were all the more offensive to Him. He felt that their tread profaned His courts, and He refused to hear their many prayers. There was no real repentance, no trembling at His word, but a religious veil over utter and shameless wickedness.
The reason God gives is not vague displeasure. He names what those hands had done.
Jehovah called the leaders of the people "rulers of Sodom," because of the corruption among them. Because of the violence He said, "your hands are full of blood."
Isaiah later returns to the same charge and states the principle behind the hidden face. God's silence is never weakness on His side.
"Behold, the LORD's hand is not shortened, that it cannot save, or his ear dull, that it cannot hear; but your iniquities have made a separation between you and your God, and your sins have hidden his face from you so that he does not hear." And what a picture follows in the verses just after! "For your hands are defiled with blood and your fingers with iniquity..."
The verse turns from history into self-examination the moment we ask God to act in our own day.
And can God not intervene again in answer to the cries of His people? He can, blessed be His name... He has set a limit to the tides of evil, and it is our part to pray. And yet the question ought to be raised in many of our hearts as to whether we are ready and fit to pray.
The New Testament sets the same standard for lifted hands. The ESV reads "lifting holy hands without anger or quarreling"; the older wording quoted below says "doubting."
But right moral condition still stands — "raising up holy hands, without anger and doubting," or perhaps "reasoning." The holiness meant here is godly integrity, not the holiness of a person set apart... A man who knew of evil in himself that he had not judged should not take so solemn a part, or any part, in the assembly.
The warning is not only for ancient Israel.
Let us never forget one thing. With God, right moral condition matters far more than ceremonial exactness in Judaism, or even correct church procedure in Christianity. If careful church correctness encourages moral carelessness, it becomes an abomination to God.
The hidden face is not the last word. The next verses call for a washing that is real, not ritual.
Yet Jehovah stoops to call them to repentance and to the fruits that suit it. The language draws on the ceremonial washings so familiar to the Jews, but moral reality is the point... God can tolerate evil nowhere, least of all in His people. They must therefore stop doing evil and learn to do good, proving it in ordinary daily life. But He adds a gracious invitation that He and they should reason together. Soon they would find where the fault lay, and with whom is the grace that is willing to wash the foulest clean.
- Hands raised. God Himself had commanded Judah's worship, yet He calls it weariness. Their exactness was only a decent exterior over a mass of moral evil.
- Hands stained. The charge is specific: violence and blood. Privilege did not soften the verdict; it made the state more alarming.
- Eyes hidden. God's ear is not dull and His hand is not short — sins made the separation and hid His face.
- Hands examined. Before we ask God to act, we must ask if we are fit to pray. Holy hands mean godly integrity: evil judged, not carried into the assembly.
- Hands washed. The washing God asks for is moral, not ritual: stop the evil, learn to do good. Then comes His invitation to reason together — His grace washes the foulest clean.
Wash you, make you clean; put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes; -- cease to do evil,
Isaiah's hearers were busy with worship — sacrifices, feasts, prayers — but God did not want a better ceremony. He tells them to wash, which raises the question of the whole chapter: how can such people make themselves clean?
The problem was not lack of religious effort. It was religion laid over a life God could not look at.
They had plenty of religious zeal. They also looked for a remedy for the obvious troubles of their day. But their remedies were worse than useless. Their divine privileges only made their moral state more shocking and unbearable. Apart from the Lord's mercy they were close to the doom of Sodom. Morally they were Sodom already. So their sacrifices, feasts, and assemblies were all the more hateful to the Lord. He felt their tread profaned His courts, and He refused to hear their many prayers. There was no real repentance and no trembling at His word — only a religious veil over open and shameless wickedness.
The wording sounds like Israel's ritual washings. But that is not what God is after, and He does not leave them to clean themselves alone.
Yet the Lord still stoops to call them to repentance and to the fruits that suit it. The wording comes from the ceremonial washings so familiar to the Jews. But moral reality is the point, as the next words make plain. God can tolerate iniquity nowhere, least of all in His people. They must therefore stop doing evil and learn to do good, proving it in the ways of ordinary life. But He also adds a gracious invitation: that He and they should reason together. Then they would soon find where the fault lay, and with whom is the grace that is willing to wash the foulest clean.
God aims this call at the heart, and He still makes it. Yet the washing it asks for is work He Himself takes up.
One thing is certain. Ordinary water could never remove the defilement of the Jew, or the blood-guilt of the Gentile (Job 9:30-31). And God's appeal still goes out: "O Jerusalem, wash your heart from wickedness, so that you may be saved. How long shall your wicked thoughts lodge within you?" (Jer. 4:14). "Wash yourselves; make yourselves clean; remove the evil of your deeds from before my eyes" (Isa. 1:16)… But there can be no real national response until they look to Him whom they pierced. Then the Lord Himself will undertake their purification. He promised long ago: "I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you shall be clean from all your uncleannesses" (Ezek. 36:25).
The verse ends where the next one begins, and the order cannot be swapped.
So the word is (vv. 16, 17): "Wash yourselves; make yourselves clean … cease to do evil, learn to do good." There is the weighty matter. Have a good conscience before God: if not, you become blind of yourselves before you are blinded by God. God distinguishes between actions. No one can learn to do good before ceasing from evil. No one can have light in the conscience without first leaving what wounds the conscience.
A common reply is that a person cannot leave what is wrong until he has found something better. The verse cuts that reply off.
Are you doing what you know to be wrong? Does anything tie you to what you admit is against Scripture? Then listen to the word of the Lord: "Cease to do evil." And be sure of this: once you obey this word, you will not stay in the dark about your path for long. It is sheer unbelief that makes us say, "I cannot cease to do evil until I find something better."
The verse is half of a pair. To treat the cleansing as the whole work is its own danger.
In the Old Testament God's people heard, "cease to do evil" and "learn to do good." In the New Testament we hear, "Abhor what is evil" and "hold fast to what is good," and the like (Isa. 1:16-17; Rom. 12:9). In Spirit-led, God-fearing souls these always go together. To rest in having separated from evil would be a real danger. It might soon lean toward greater evil, or end in cold and dry orthodoxy.
- Clean, not busier. Their worship was full and their lives were foul. More sacrifices could not answer a state that was Sodom under a religious veil.
- Clean in reality. The wording borrows Israel's ritual washings. God asks for a moral cleansing, shown in ordinary life.
- Clean by God. No water ever washed away such defilement. God promises to sprinkle clean water Himself and make His people clean.
- Clean first, then taught. No one learns to do good while the conscience is still wounded. Stop the evil, and light comes.
- Clean is not the finish. Ceasing and learning belong together. Stopping alone can drift into greater evil, or into dry orthodoxy.
learn to do well seek judgment, gladden the oppressed, do justice to the fatherless, plead for the widow.
God has just told a religious nation that He hates their feasts and sacrifices. Now He says what He wants instead: not better worship, but justice for people who have no one to defend them.
God puts the two halves of His demand in a fixed order. One writer, commenting on the call to wash and put away evil, ties it to the conscience:
That is the serious matter. Have a good conscience before God. If you do not, you blind yourselves before God blinds you. God distinguishes between actions. No one can learn to do good before he stops doing evil. No one can have light in the conscience without first leaving what wounds the conscience.
That order is not a delay tactic. It is how God teaches anyone at all:
Separation from evil is always insisted upon throughout the Bible. It is especially stressed as a prime necessity for the godly soul in days of ruin. By it one gives a visible proof of the activity of a divine nature that hates evil and loves good and desires to obey and honour the Lord. "Cease to do evil; learn to do well" (Isa. 1:16, 17); this is always God's order. The first step is to separate from evil and then God will teach that one His will and will show him the next step.
The list that follows the command is not ceremonial at all. God had refused their feasts, and then named what He was after instead:
Study the prophets, the greater and the minor, and you will find that their ministry always had this one end. It was to bring the people into moral conformity with God. Because this was missing, the time came when even their sacrifices and feasts were an abomination. However carefully they tried to carry out the temple worship, God would not accept it. These are the terrible words from the lips of Isaiah, "Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hates." Then he tells them what the Lord requires: "seek justice, correct oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow's cause." Again, "Is not this the fast that I choose: to loose the bonds of wickedness, to undo the straps of the yoke, to let the oppressed go free, and to break every yoke?" (Isa. 1 and 58).
Two of these duties name people who have no one to speak for them. Writing on the laws God gave Israel about the same two groups, one commentator explains why they head the list:
God next commends the helpless to their hearts. Of all the helpless ones who appeal to our compassion, the widow and the fatherless surely have the first claim. So God surrounds them here with the powerful defence of His own arm. If anyone afflicted them, he would be killed, and his own wife and children would be left a widow and orphans. All through Scripture God marks out these two groups as the special object of His care, so they should be the object of our compassionate concern. So James says, "Religion that is pure and undefiled before God the Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world." (James 1:27.)
The verse says "seek justice" before it names the fatherless. Another writer, on a psalm with the same demands, holds justice and pity together:
But this cared for, they must show Him also on His salvation side, in His regard for the poor, the weak, the defenceless, and the oppressed. "Give justice to the weak and the fatherless; maintain the right of the afflicted and the destitute." It must still be justice: pity for the poor must never violate it. There was a special commandment about this (Ex. 23:3). Yet his poverty should still make him an object of special and tender interest.
Much of Isaiah 1 belongs to Israel. One writer says this call does not stay there:
God can tolerate iniquity nowhere, least of all in His people. So they must cease from evil and learn to do well, proving it in the ways of ordinary life… In the earlier of these verses there is much that we can freely take to ourselves now. God's unchanging principle is to join repentance to faith, and to insist on suitable works and ways in everyone He draws to Himself. The words apply in a special way to believers who shirk responsibility and trifle with a clear conscience.
- Cease. Drop the evil first; a conscience with a wound in it cannot take in light.
- Learn. Doing good has to be learned, and God keeps the order: leave the evil, then learn the good.
- Seek. God answered rejected sacrifices with a call for justice; the prophets aimed at people in moral conformity with God.
- Defend. The fatherless and the widow have the first claim on compassion. God surrounds them with the defence of His own arm.
- Prove it. The call reaches everyone God draws to Himself, and ordinary daily life is where it shows.
Come now, let us reason together, saith Jehovah though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
If ye be willing and hearken, ye shall eat the good of the land;
God has just called Judah to stop doing evil and to reason with Him. Now He sets out two roads, and this verse is the first: is its promise earthly or eternal, and may a preacher use it today?
The promise does not stand alone. It closes a call to repentance that reaches into ordinary life.
Yet Jehovah stoops to call them to repentance and to the fruits that match it. The wording clearly comes from the ceremonial washings the Jews knew so well, but moral reality is the point... God can tolerate iniquity nowhere, least of all in His people. They must therefore stop doing evil and learn to do good, showing it in the ways of ordinary life. But He adds a gracious invitation, that He and they should reason together... The call ends with His promise to help them if they were broken down and obedient. It ends too with His threat to devour them by the sword if they refused.
Verse 20 gives the other road: refuse and rebel. Both verses turn on one small word.
Notice too how "if" occurs in verses 19 and 20. The cleansing and blessing offered hinge upon obedience. To refuse and rebel brings judgment. Both the blessing and the judgment deal with matters of this life. The Old Testament says little about the life to come.
Why does God offer terms at all instead of simply passing sentence? The answer lies in how He governs the world.
God's government of the world has Israel at its centre and its immediate sphere. But we have to remember that grace must have a part in this government, or it would not be the government of God. It would be nothing but judicial condemnation, with no possibility of blessing.
To "eat the good of the land" came with terms. Israel held the land the way a tenant holds a lease, and the lease ran out — but the story does not end there.
Under law, they failed to meet the conditions that their continued enjoyment of earthly blessing depended on. So they failed to keep hold of it, even when God had given it to them so fully, in Joshua's day and in Solomon's. In days to come, grace will restore and save them. They will stand in grace, no longer holding their blessings on the terms of their own obedience. Yet their blessings — the blessings that belong to their calling and position — will still be earthly.
The verse ties a reward to conduct, so it is easy to read as a formula for earning salvation. Does obedience buy a place in heaven?
Israel's inheritance depended on their conduct. If they were willing and obedient, they were to eat the good of the land. Do you think — does anyone here think — that his obedience could get him to heaven? Could it win him that inheritance which is reserved in heaven for believers? If he does, he is very greatly mistaken. In thinking that way he is not obeying God; he is only disobeying Him. The one who trusts his own obedience or faithfulness is not trusting Christ at all. He is not really believing the gospel.
Commentators differ here. Kelly says the offer of cleansing in the verse before may be pressed on anyone. But verses 19 and 20, he holds, cannot be cut loose from Israel, since Christians have fuller and more direct appeals in the New Testament. Hole allows a preacher to use them, as long as he takes the eternal weight of the words from New Testament scripture, not from Isaiah. Either way, the word willing still stands. What does a willing sinner do?
Nothing could be plainer, and when a sinner feels his need of the Saviour and is ready to say "I will" to Him — to the Lord Jesus Christ — the great transaction is for ever done.
- The call — the promise follows a call to stop doing evil and learn to do good. God ties repentance to the offer.
- The "if" — verses 19 and 20 turn on the same word. Both the blessing and the judgment belong to this present life.
- The grace — grace must have a part even in God's rule of the world, or only condemnation would remain.
- The land — Israel held the land on the terms of obedience, and lost it. Grace will restore them one day on different terms, and their blessings will still be earthly.
- The will — no conduct buys the inheritance kept in heaven. But the sinner who is ready to say "I will" to Christ finds the transaction settled for ever.
but if ye refuse and rebel, ye shall be devoured with the sword for the mouth of Jehovah hath spoken.
God has just offered Judah cleansing and blessing, on one condition. Everything turns on two small words: one "if" opens the land to them, the other opens the sword.
One writer points out that the offer of cleansing hangs on obedience, and that the outcomes named here belong to this life:
Notice too how "if" occurs in verses 19 and 20. The cleansing and blessing offered hinge on obedience. To refuse and rebel brings judgment. Both the blessing and the judgment concern this life, because the Old Testament says little about the life to come. Today's gospel preacher gladly and rightly uses these verses. Of course he points to the eternal results of accepting or refusing the offer, and he bases what he says on New Testament scripture.
This was not a new rule invented by Isaiah. It restates the terms God had already set for Israel in the land, where harvests themselves testified for or against the people:
But when Israel forgot the Lord and abandoned His precious commandments, the sky became like brass and the ground like iron. Barrenness, ruin, famine and misery were the sad companions of disobedience. How could it be otherwise? "If you are willing and obedient, you shall eat the good of the land..."
The people God warns here were not irreligious. Their sacrifices were many, and that made their condition worse, not better:
They did not lack religious zeal. They did look for a cure for the clear problems of their day. But their cures were worse than useless. The privileges God gave them only made their moral state more alarming and unbearable. Only the Lord's mercy kept them from the doom of Sodom, yet morally they were already Sodom. So their sacrifices, feasts, and assemblies offended Him all the more. He felt that their feet defiled His courts, and He refused to hear their many prayers. There was no real repentance, no trembling at His word, but a religious veil over utter and shameless iniquity.
The same voice that offers cleansing also names the sword. The same writer follows the appeal to its end, then draws a careful line about how far a Christian may take these two verses:
The call ends with His promise to help them if they were broken down and obedient. It also ends with His threat to devour them by the sword if they refused. In the earlier verses there is much we can take to ourselves now. God's principle never changes: He joins repentance to faith, and He looks for fitting works and ways in all whom He draws to Himself... But there we must stop. Verses 19 and 20 cannot be cut off from their Jewish root. Christians have plenty of appeals, and more direct ones, in the New Testament.
Commentators differ in emphasis. Hole lets the gospel preacher draw an eternal application from the New Testament. Kelly keeps this promise and threat tied to Israel, though he applies the earlier invitation to us freely.
History settled the question of whether God meant it. Writing on the fall of Jerusalem, one writer sets the warning of Isaiah 1 beside what followed:
They did refuse and rebel. They ignored all His counsel and refused His correction. The sad and solemn result is recorded for us: the foe and the enemy entered the gates of Jerusalem. What the kings of the earth and all the people of the world would not have believed came to pass.
The verse does not end with the sword but with a signature. Prophets used that closing line again and again:
It is striking to remember how prophet after prophet spoke in this way: "Thus says the LORD," "The mouth of the LORD has spoken." They begin and end their whole prophecy with words like these.
- Two ifs. The cleansing and blessing offered hinge on obedience; to refuse and rebel brings judgment.
- Two outcomes. In Isaiah's setting both blessing and judgment concern this life — the good of the land, or the sword.
- Two hearts. Their refusal was not irreligion. Their sacrifices and feasts were a religious veil over shameless sin.
- Two records. They did refuse and rebel — and the enemy entered the gates of Jerusalem, as no one had believed possible.
- One voice. The prophets began and ended with "the mouth of the LORD has spoken." The threat is God's word, not Isaiah's.
How is the faithful city become a harlot! It was full of judgment; righteousness used to lodge in it, but now murderers.
Isaiah does not open with an accusation but with a cry of grief: the city God chose has changed character, and the change is described in the language of a broken marriage. The word itself is a figure, and it is used the same way elsewhere in Scripture:
A woman given over to sexual immorality: there were such women as early as Gen. 38:15. The word also stands as a picture of unfaithfulness: "How the faithful city has become a harlot!" Isa. 1:21; Ezek. 16:31, 35. Revelation calls the symbolic Babylon "The mother of harlots" (Rev. 17:5) — not only unfaithful herself, but the mother of others like her.
The sting of the verse is not that wickedness exists in the world. It is that this wickedness sits in the one place God had put His name:
The saddest thing for the heart of God is not that the world is wicked. It is that the city which bears His name, the city His eyes rest on continually, should be so evil… His judgment begins with His house. In Ezekiel 9, once the remnant are marked, He has the whole city struck, beginning at His sanctuary. He points out the sins in detail afterward. We have here a great present principle: if Christendom has deserved the judgment of God, His judgment begins with His house to purify it. In this sense we are saved with difficulty. It was over Jerusalem that Jesus wept.
The decline was not the fault of one bad generation of leaders. What the city had become showed up in the state of God's house, and every class of person contributed to it:
How very sad it is to see the temple defiled in the days of David's unfaithful sons. Its treasures gone, its doors shut, the house needed repair and cleansing. The state of God's house reflected the moral state of the city, as Isaiah wrote: "How the faithful city has become a harlot" (Isa. 1:21). Everyone shared in the evil, as Jeremiah 32:32 shows — kings, princes, priests, prophets and people. So the glory of the Lord had to leave, unwillingly, the city that had so terribly dishonoured the holy Name of the God of Israel. And this happened before the temple and the city were destroyed.
Some read prophecies like this as pictures of something spiritual. One writer insists the subject is the actual city on the map:
In Isaiah 1 we have a moral pleading between God and Israel. It is the same Jerusalem all the way through; but at first Jerusalem appears as no better than Sodom and Gomorrah… There can be no question what city is meant. It is certainly not the heavenly Jerusalem. It is the literal, historical, earthly Jerusalem — already corrupt, growing more and more rebellious, about to turn away from God completely.
The charge in the verse is not treated as spent history. It is read as a description that has never yet been reversed — and as one half of a promise whose other half is still to come:
In chapter 1 Isaiah speaks of Jerusalem as a harlot, with murderers living in it. This is true now, and blood-guilt rests on the city. But afterward, Isaiah announces, "you shall be called the city of righteousness, the faithful city." That will be after the Lord has come.
The lament is not God's last word about the city. The same passage that names her fall names the title she will carry when God takes up residence in her again — and that carries a demand wherever He dwells:
In the past, Jerusalem had been full of iniquity… Wherever God stoops to dwell — in the tabernacle, the temple, or the church — truth and holiness must be maintained.
- Faithful. The city was once bound to God like a wife. "Harlot" is the Bible's own picture of that bond broken. Revelation uses the same word for Babylon.
- Fallen. Justice once lived there; now murderers do. Kings, priests, prophets and people all had a hand in it, and the state of God's house showed the state of the city.
- Grieved. What wounds God most is not the world's wickedness. It is evil in the place that carries His name. So His judgment starts at His own house, to purify it.
- Literal. The Jerusalem accused here is the real, historical city, not a spiritual picture. So the promise made to her is as real as the charge.
- Restored. Blood-guilt still rests on her; but "afterward" she will be called the city of righteousness. Wherever God dwells, truth and holiness must be kept.
Thy silver is become dross, thy wine is mixed with water
Isaiah has just called Jerusalem a faithful city turned unfaithful, and now he presses the charge with two plain pictures: waste metal and watered wine. The city has not dropped its religion — what it still has is no longer the real thing.
The sting of the verse lies in whom Isaiah describes. God had put His name on this city.
The saddest thing for the heart of God is not that the world is wicked. It is that the city which bears His name, the city His eyes always rest on, should be so evil. "How the faithful city has become a prostitute! It was full of justice; righteousness lodged in it, but now murderers… your princes are rebellious, and companions of thieves." His judgment begins with His house.
Dross is the waste a refiner skims off and throws away. Used of a people, the word is a verdict.
Scripture likens God's ancient people, in their morally degraded state, to "reprobate silver," or "refuse silver" as the margin has it, in Jeremiah 6:30. Isaiah 1:22 reads, "your silver has become dross" — rejected.
The second picture comes from the marketplace, where the trade word behind it picked up a darker sense.
The noun kapelos means someone who sells wine. You can see it in the Greek Old Testament at Isaiah 1:22, which speaks of "wine merchants" — and then adds at once that they "mix the wine with water." The practice became so common that the verb kapeleuo came to mean making a profit by corrupting what is sold. That verb appears in 2 Corinthians 2:17. The verse may therefore be translated "traffic in," or "make gain by corrupting the word of God." So the passage implies that the people it speaks of falsified the word of God to gain something for themselves.
Dilution and profit travel together.
Water does not attack wine. It just stops it being wine. The same happens when people blend what is God's with what is man's.
So when a Christian, or a whole assembly of believers, mixes with the world, the loss is always on the Christian's side. The world always acts from its own motives, and the flesh is always in the Christian. He may draw near to the world, but the world does not draw near to the Spirit. The testimony, however, is lost. Wine mixed with water is no longer pure wine; it has lost its taste. The friendship of the world is enmity against God.
This blending does not look like a loss.
Mixing what is of God with what is of man is a special form of evil. It is a very effective tool in Satan's hand for spoiling the testimony of Christ on the earth. This mixing often looks like something very desirable. It can look like a wider spread of what is of God — a fuller, stronger flow of a divine influence — something to welcome rather than regret. But our judgement about it depends entirely on where we stand when we look at it.
The charge is not God's last word. A few verses later He says what He will do with the waste metal.
Their present ruin stands in contrast with what the city was and what it is to be. "Therefore says the Lord, the LORD of hosts, the Mighty One of Israel: Ah, I will get relief from My adversaries and avenge Myself on My enemies. And I will turn My hand on you and thoroughly purge away your dross, and take away all your alloy. And I will restore your judges as at the first, and your counsellors as at the beginning. Then you will be called The city of righteousness, the faithful town."
The same writer insists this promise still waits on a real city, not a symbol.
There can be no question which city is meant. It is not the heavenly Jerusalem. The prophet has in view the literal, historical Jerusalem on earth, already corrupt, growing more and more rebellious, about to turn away from God completely… Can any fair-minded person claim, or even imagine, that there has ever been so much as the appearance of this moral restoration being fulfilled?
- Dross — no one stole the silver; it went bad. God's verdict on such a people is "refuse silver," rejected.
- Dilution — watered wine is the trader's fraud. The same Greek word stands behind "corrupting the word of God" for personal advantage.
- Disguise — mixing what is God's with what is man's looks like growth, not loss. Only God's viewpoint shows it up.
- Discipline — because the city carried His name, judgment starts there. What grieves God most is corruption in the place He has claimed.
- Deliverance — the refiner wants the metal, not the waste. God promises to purge the dross, remove the alloy, and call the city "faithful" again. One commentator insists history has not yet seen it happen.
thy princes are rebellious, and companions of thieves; every one loveth presents, and hunteth after rewards; they judge not the fatherless, and the cause of the widow cometh not unto them.
Isaiah names the men who should have guarded justice in Jerusalem. He finds them siding with thieves, chasing gifts, and leaving the fatherless and the widow with no one to hear their case.
This is not a pagan city. It is the city that carries God's name, and that is what makes the ruin so bitter.
The saddest thing for the heart of God is not that the world is wicked. It is that the city which bears His name, the city His eyes rest on continually, should be so evil.
These rulers were meant to show what God is like toward the weak. Their failure hurt more than the poor.
The princes of the people should have displayed God's own justice and mercy. Instead they had become rebellious and companions of thieves. They loved gifts and hated what is right, and their selfish, wicked deeds polluted Jehovah's holy name completely. God's truth and love were gone from them, and they had no fear of Him before their eyes. Yet they might still use His name to justify their unjust and oppressive acts.
The princes did not merely give in to bribes. They loved them and ran after gifts. One writer adds that the man who hands over the money is as guilty as the man who takes it.
A gift that twists the course of judgment blinds the eyes. It marks out the man who takes it as wicked, and the man who gives it no less. Taking it in secret ought to be a signal of danger. No other human eye sees it, but God hates the wrong, and He is not mocked.
The warning reaches further than courtrooms.
Where bribery is widespread, justice is almost unknown. "The bribe blinds those whose eyes are open." Let us read this verse in its spirit as well as in its letter. Self-interest can blind the eyes of a sincere Christian, who would never for one moment consider accepting a bribe.
The fatherless and the widow had no money to offer, so their cases never reached the bench. But they were not as friendless as they looked.
Heartless dishonesty toward anyone, and above all toward the fatherless, draws out a far graver warning... If they have no father, they need no lawyer, and they need not take the law into their own hands. Their Kinsman, their Redeemer, is strong. He will plead their cause against the cheat, high or low.
Isaiah names the princes, not the crowd. One writer explains why rank raises the guilt.
All the people have their responsibility, but the chief weight must fall according to each person's position. Wickedness in someone who holds an office of trust is worse than the same evil in a man under him, and it justly counts as more serious. Wrongdoing in a judge, for instance, is graver than dishonesty in a stable-hand or his master. Corruption or tyranny in a king is deeper guilt than failings here or there in any of his subjects.
The charge does not end in despair. When human courts are for sale, God Himself steps in.
Judgment must take its course against stubborn wrongdoers. Sadly, these are above all the men who have held the places of rule and judgment among them. The twisting of judgment must be stopped with a strong hand, and the places of authority cleansed of their defilement with evil. For this God Himself must take the judgment seat and rule among men. He is ready to do it — not in Israel alone, though He begins there, but over all the earth.
- Trust — the princes held office to show God's justice and mercy. Their corruption wronged the poor and dragged His name into their oppression.
- Betrayal — they loved gifts, and a bribe convicts the giver as much as the taker. No human eye sees it; God does.
- Blindness — self-interest can blind a sincere believer who would never take a bribe. Read the warning in spirit, not only in letter.
- The unheard — the fatherless need no lawyer. Their Redeemer is strong, and He will plead their cause against the wrongdoer, high or low.
- The remedy — guilt grows with position, and God Himself will take the judgment seat. He will cleanse the places of authority, beginning with Israel and reaching the whole earth.
Therefore saith the Lord, Jehovah of hosts, the Mighty One of Israel Ah! I will ease me of mine adversaries, and avenge me of mine enemies.
Isaiah's first chapter reads like a courtroom. The nation stands exposed, its worship refused, its capital charged with unfaithfulness. At verse 24 God stops pleading and starts announcing. The surprise is who He calls His enemies.
The verse is a verdict. The evidence has just been read out: silver turned to dross, wine watered down, princes who run with thieves.
The corruption of Jerusalem, and above all of its rulers, now lies exposed. "How the faithful city has become a whore, she who was full of justice! Righteousness lodged in her, but now murderers. Your silver has become dross, your best wine mixed with water. Your princes are rebels and companions of thieves." Finally Jehovah shows that He must deal with His adversaries, and must Himself restore Zion. This comes when idols and their makers perish together under His mighty hand. He sets their present ruin against what the city once was and what it will yet be.
We expect the "enemies" of the God of Israel to be foreign armies. They are not. The people who carry His name have taken the position of His foes.
When Jehovah says (Isa. 1:24), "I will get relief from my enemies and avenge myself on my foes," He was speaking of people in Israel. It is a most terrible thing when the people of God take a place that is never said of the poor sinner who does not know God. There is a consuming fire for the adversaries (Heb. 10:27). God's people come under His judgments. There will be a remnant, but for the mass of the people, judgment. Yet Zion will be restored, in keeping with God's faithfulness. God separates out the remnant at the end, and judgment falls on the people, not on the remnant.
Where the ESV has "get relief," older translations read "ease Me of Mine adversaries." The picture is God unburdening Himself of what He has put up with for so long.
He will avenge Himself of His enemies who corrupted Zion; He will satisfy Himself in dealing with His adversaries. And when He has carried out His judgment, He will restore Jerusalem as it was of old. But if judgment must fall on Israel, the result will be that the law goes out from Zion. Jerusalem will then be, more truly than ever, the throne of Jehovah.
God speaks here under three titles, not one. The last of them, "the Mighty One of Israel," is rare.
The rarer title "Mighty One of Israel" appears in both halves of Isaiah. Elsewhere it is found only in Genesis 49:24 and Psalm 132:2, 5, as others have noted.
So Israel's own Mighty One now speaks against Israel.
The threat does not stop at ruin. God's dealing with His enemies serves a larger plan.
So we learn that Israel's future restoration is tied to the great crisis coming so fast upon us. In that crisis God will step in with power to settle His long-standing dispute with His rebellious creatures.
But how will God do this, and when? One writer contrasts it with the way God acts today.
God purifies Jerusalem not by grace but by power. Where in the New Testament is there a prophecy that after the Church that professes His name becomes corrupt, God would step in and restore purity by the severe judgments spoken of in these verses? Christianity is the time of God's patience and long-suffering. It is the time when Christ waits at God's right hand until God makes His foes His footstool. Judgment is what marks God's dealings with the earth.
Another writer places the passage beyond anything that happened around Israel's exile in Babylon.
The promise and the judgment go far beyond the circumstances before and after the Babylonian captivity. The last fiery trial of Israel is in view, and grace will use it for spiritual refining. But it is in no way the gospel as it is now, which is grace reigning through righteousness to eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord. Here it is destructive judgment carried out on the evil, when the repentant remnant of the Jews enjoy God's mercy.
- Therefore — the verdict rests on the record just read: silver turned to dross, wine watered down, a faithful city gone corrupt.
- Adversaries — the enemies God names are inside Israel. It is a most terrible thing when His own people take a place never said of the sinner who does not know Him.
- Relief — to "ease Himself" is to satisfy Himself. He will avenge Himself on the enemies who corrupted Zion, and then restore the city.
- Power — the cleansing comes by power, not by persuasion. Now is the time of God's long-suffering, while Christ waits at God's right hand.
- Result — the crisis settles God's long-standing dispute with His rebellious creatures, and Jerusalem is restored as of old.
And I will turn my hand upon thee, and will thoroughly purge away thy dross, and take away all thine alloy;
God has just said He will deal with His enemies. Now His hand turns to the city herself — so what is the dross He burns away, and does that turned hand mean anger or mercy?
Older translations say "tin" where the ESV says "alloy." Both point to a real metal, mixed in with better ones:
This is the metal the ancients called stannum. It is found mixed with lead and other metals, but smelting separates it out.
The smelting is not destruction. It happens for the sake of what is left behind:
It matters all the more, if there is precious metal, that the cheap alloy is taken away. Only then does something beautiful and useful come out.
Commentators differ here. Some read the turned hand as blessing: God deals with His adversaries, then turns to the remnant:
In verse 24 the prophet announces that the Lord is going to act in judgment, treating them as adversaries. But in the next verse he declares that He will turn His hand upon the remnant, refining them as silver and purging away their dross. The phrase "turn My hand" also appears in Zechariah 13:7, where, as here, it means an act of blessing and not judgment.
Others compare the same wording in other books and read the hand as judgment. Even so, for the faithful that judgment purifies:
The faithful must feel the condition of Israel, and the sin they are all caught up in. But for them, living through Him, it is passing through the fire to be purified. I think Isaiah 1:25, Amos 1:8, and Psalm 81:14 show that "turning the hand upon" means judgment.
The two readings meet at the same point. The fire that consumes the dross is the very fire that proves the silver.
The refining does not soften the nation as a whole. It divides. God keeps the metal and cuts off the waste:
Isaiah 1:25-28 decrees the full restoration of the Jews; but by judgments which cut off the wicked.
It is tempting to read this verse as the gospel at work today. One writer says plainly that it is not, and points to a final trial still ahead of Israel:
The last fiery trial of Israel is in view, which grace will use for spiritual refining... But it is in no way the gospel as now, which is grace reigning through righteousness to life eternal by Jesus Christ our Lord. Here God carries out destructive judgment on the wicked, while the repentant remnant of the Jews enjoy His mercy... Jerusalem must be purged before God can make her a centre of the nations.
History never matched this promise. That is the case for reading it as a real, still-future event:
There can be no question which city is meant. It is not the heavenly Jerusalem. The prophet is speaking of the literal, historical Jerusalem on earth, seen here as already corrupt, growing more and more rebellious, and about to turn away from God completely... Can any fair-minded person claim, or even imagine, that this moral restoration has ever looked like it happened?
The purging has a goal. God removes the waste so the nation can become what He meant it to be:
Here we see that the judgments of God are to visit the people. The dross of the nation is to be removed. The rest are to learn righteousness. Then Jerusalem is to become what God designed it to be: the centre of righteous government in the earth.
- Dross — Cheap alloy is mixed into the metal, and only smelting takes it out. The furnace is God's answer to corruption.
- Hand — Commentators differ: some read the turned hand as blessing, others as judgment. Either way, the fire that burns the waste refines what is real.
- Fire — Full restoration comes by judgments that cut off the wicked. It comes through judgment, never around it.
- Remnant — A repentant remnant comes through the fire and receives mercy. That is not the same as the gospel of grace at work today.
- City — The end of it all is the real Jerusalem on earth, God's centre of righteous government.
and I will restore thy judges as at the first, and thy counsellors as at the beginning. Afterwards thou shalt be called, Town of righteousness, Faithful city.
Isaiah has just called Jerusalem a faithful city turned harlot. God has promised to burn her dross away. Verse 26 is what comes out of that fire: the same city, under new leadership, carrying a new name.
God makes this promise to the city that failed, not to some other people. One writer follows the whole chapter as one argument about a single place.
All through the chapter it is the same Jerusalem. At first Jerusalem looks no better than Sodom and Gomorrah. The faithful city had become a harlot... There is no question which city is meant. It is not the heavenly Jerusalem. It is the literal, historical Jerusalem here on earth — already corrupt, growing more and more rebellious, about to fall away from God altogether.
Sodom and Gomorrah were two cities God destroyed for their wickedness.
The word "afterward" sets an order. God first deals with His enemies, and only then rebuilds.
He will avenge Himself on the enemies who corrupted Zion. He will satisfy Himself in dealing with those who oppose Him. And when He has carried out His judgment, He will restore Jerusalem as it was of old. Judgment must fall on Israel. But the result will be that the law goes out from Zion. Jerusalem will then be, more truly than ever, the throne of the Lord.
The thing restored is leadership: judges and counsellors. One writer ties that repair to the King's own rule.
He will straighten out what they have perverted, when He rules.
Some read prophecies like this as pictures of the church rather than of Jerusalem. One writer answers from the chapter itself: the curses and the promises speak to the same city.
Here we see God's judgments coming on the people. The dross of the nation is taken away. The rest learn righteousness. Then Jerusalem becomes what God meant it to be: the centre of righteous government on the earth... Everyone admits that the woes and judgments announced in this same chapter refer to the real Judah and Jerusalem. How, then, can we say that the promises that come right after them, and are closely tied to them, refer to a symbolic Judah and Jerusalem? And what have righteous judges and counsellors to do with the Church? Their unrighteousness was one of the great crimes charged against Jerusalem, while their purity is essential to carrying out God's purposes of earthly government, of which Zion is the chosen centre.
One writer weighs the promise against history. Jews did come back from exile in Babylon — but they came back to nothing like this.
Has there been anything since that answers to this promise? A small body of Jews did return from the captivity in Babylon. But was Zion restored as at the beginning? Was Jerusalem at any time afterwards the city of righteousness? On the contrary, did they not come back weak and few, a poor broken remnant, the slaves and prey of foreign rulers? Did they not then go on to the deeper guilt of rejecting their own Messiah?
Another writer names the time plainly.
The promised restoration of Jerusalem is still future. The "afterward," when the earthly Jerusalem will be called "The City of Righteousness," points to the second coming of Christ.
Some have used this verse to argue for restored officers in the church today. One writer answers that the whole chapter speaks to Israel.
Every word of the chapter concerns the Jews only: their moral judgment, God's wrath carried out on those who will not repent, and their glorious restoration when they repent and the Lord avenges Himself on His enemies... This is not under the gospel or the church at all. It is when Zion is redeemed with judgment and those in her who repent are redeemed with righteousness. It is not "this evil age," but the age to come.
God's pattern of recovery is not invention but return. The same principle has been read across Scripture and history.
The same thing is obviously true if, turning from Israel we look back over the history of Christendom... In each case that which was at the first was a work of God, though committed into the hands of men; and that which was introduced later was not an advance or an improvement, but an adulteration.
The new name is not decoration. It describes what God Himself will keep in that city.
When the Lord has once more made His home in Jerusalem... the city will be a city of truth. Zion, God's holy mountain, set apart by His own glory and undefiled by His worshippers, will be kept in holiness. Wherever God stoops to live among His people — in the tabernacle, the temple, or the church — truth and holiness must be maintained.
- Same city. The city that became a harlot is the city that will be called faithful. God does not move the promise to anyone else.
- First the fire. "Afterward" follows the purging: God deals with His adversaries, then restores.
- Then the judges. He repairs what her rulers ruined: righteous government, as it was at the beginning.
- Then the name. "City of righteousness" names a character God Himself will keep. Where He lives, truth and holiness must be kept.
- Still future. History has not answered this yet. Writers place it at Christ's coming, not in this age.
Zion shall be redeemed with judgment, and they that return of her with righteousness.
Isaiah's first chapter is God's case against a guilty nation. Verse 27 turns that case into a promise, and the promise comes by an unexpected road: the judgment that breaks the guilty is what sets Zion free.
Zion is a place on the map, not a symbol for the church.
Zion was literally the south-eastern height called David's city. Moriah was the north-eastern height, and the Lord's house stood there. But the prophets often use Zion (Isaiah 1:27) in a figurative way. They also use it as another name for Jerusalem as a whole… We may add that it is nothing but ignorance to assume that Zion anywhere means the church of God, even as a metaphor.
Verse 25 says God will turn His hand upon His people. That sounds like a threat. One writer points to a parallel passage and finds the opposite.
In verse 24 he announces that the Lord is going to act in judgment, treating them as adversaries. But in the next verse He declares that He will turn His hand upon the remnant. He will refine them as silver and purge away their dross. You also find the expression "turn My hand" in Zechariah 13:7. There, as here, it means an action of blessing and not judgment. This is quite plain in the next verses of our chapter. But the redemption of Zion and her converts will be through judgment.
The ESV reads "by justice" where the older translations quoted below read "with judgment." Scripture shows two sides to redemption: the blood that pays for the soul, and the power that breaks the captor's grip.
Redemption is God stepping in (and in the end for the body) to break the bond of the enemy and deliver the one who was captive. It may be by blood for the soul, but finally by power for the body.
So Zion's deliverance is not the same thing as the forgiveness a believer receives through the cross.
The people are assured of God's blessing if they repent. But first the One who alone is capable of righteousness must punish the wicked in His government. Then, and not before, will Zion be redeemed in deed and truth. This redemption comes in power and with judgement. It is clearly distinct from redemption by blood only, which we know in Christ through the gospel of salvation. God's judgement goes with Judah's deliverance. Jerusalem's heart is at last reached, her time of hardness finished, her iniquity pardoned.
Older Bibles read "they that return of her" where the ESV has "those in her who repent." The word behind it means a turn-around.
The Greek word is epistrephō, "to turn to." In Scripture it is the real effect that accompanies the new birth, a turning to God. The Thessalonians show it beautifully: they "turned to God from idols, to serve the living and true God" (1 Thessalonians 1:9)… In the Old Testament the Hebrew words mean the same, "to be turned," "to turn back."
Kelly reads the clause that way. He also marks off this redemption from the one Christians know today.
In the third section (vv. 21-31) He promises that "Zion shall be redeemed with judgement, and they that return of her with righteousness." This describes the redemption that is coming. It comes not only as a witness by the blood of the Saviour who rose again, but with the mighty execution of God's judgement on His adversaries, when He purges away Israel's dross.
Nothing in Israel's history so far has matched this.
The promise and the judgement go far beyond what happened before and after the Babylonian captivity. The last fiery trial of Israel is in view. Grace will use it for spiritual refining, and then will follow the times of restoration of all things… Only "in that day" will the Lord restore the judges and the counsellors of Jerusalem as at the beginning. Only then will the city itself be one of righteousness and faithfulness… It is a victory reserved for Christ's appearing at the close of the age. Jerusalem must be purged before God can make her a centre of the nations.
Chapter 1 first offers blessing if the nation repents. The nation refuses, so blessing comes another way.
Chapter 1 proposes blessing and rest as a result of the nation's repentance; but they would not listen. Eventually judgment brings it in — "Zion shall be redeemed by justice… but rebels and sinners shall be broken together" (Isaiah 1:27-28). Isaiah 2:1-4 and Isaiah 4:2-6 show the result of this judgment: a time of peace and glory.
- Refining, not ruin. God turns His hand on Zion to purge her dross. That is the language of blessing, though it runs through judgment.
- Two redemptions. Redemption by blood covers the soul; redemption by power breaks the enemy's hold. Verse 27 is the second kind.
- Converts means returners. The word carries the sense of turning back to God, the real mark of new birth.
- Reserved for that day. The promise waits on Christ's appearing, not on Babylon's fall or on gospel preaching.
- Peace on the far side. Once God purges the city, she becomes the centre of the nations. The chapters ahead show that glory.
But the ruin of the transgressors and of the sinners [shall be] together; and they that forsake Jehovah shall be consumed.
Isaiah's opening chapter ends with two futures side by side: Zion redeemed, and those who abandon the LORD consumed. Commentators read this as one event with two outcomes. They also ask when it happens and who these rebels are. The writers quoted below use an older translation, which speaks of "the destruction of the transgressors and the sinners."
Verse 27 promises a redeemed Zion. Verse 28 shows how that promised age arrives.
Scripture testifies with one voice: the earthly blessing of the coming age will come by judgment, not by the preaching of the Gospel. Isaiah 26:9-10 states this again in the plainest terms. Revelation 15:4 confirms it in the New Testament. This judgment will mean the destruction of the transgressors. They may have forsaken the Lord and turned to false gods with their oaks and gardens, but these evil powers will avail them nothing. All will be consumed together.
Verse 27 and verse 28 describe one moment, not two stages.
Here God carries out destructive judgment on the evil, while the repentant remnant of the Jews enjoy His mercy. Only "in that day" will Jehovah restore the judges and counsellors of Jerusalem as at the beginning. Then the city itself will be one of righteousness and faithfulness. In that day Zion will be redeemed with judgment, and her converts with righteousness. At the same time Jehovah will execute vengeance on the wicked and on her idols. It is a victory reserved for Christ's appearing at the close of the age. Jerusalem must be purged before God can make her a centre of the nations. It is Christ there in power which accounts for all.
The rebels of verse 28 are not foreign invaders. God's judgment on them is the step that leads to Jerusalem's restoration.
He will avenge Himself of His enemies who corrupted Zion; He will satisfy Himself in dealing with His adversaries. And when He has carried out His judgment, He will restore Jerusalem as of old.
Writers set this verse in the day of the Lord, still ahead. One links the purging of the city and the consuming of the wicked to that same day.
From the first chapter of Isaiah the day of the Lord is in view. Jehovah speaks of that day when He says, "I will turn My hand upon you, and thoroughly purge away your dross … afterward you shall be called, The city of righteousness, the faithful city. Zion shall be redeemed with judgment, and her converts with righteousness" (Isa. 1:25-27). That day will also bring judgment on the wicked under antichrist. The Lord added, "And the destruction of the transgressors and of the sinners shall be together, and those who forsake the LORD shall be consumed" (Isa. 1:28).
Some stack this verse with others to describe the end of the ungodly. One writer answers that each text must be read in its own setting.
"The destruction of the transgressors and sinners shall be together" (Isa. 1:28) — which applies to the purification of Zion in the last days. Not one of these texts can be shown to apply to the final judgment of the wicked.
This verse shows God clearing a nation by judgment. The gospel now rests on different ground, because the judgment has already fallen elsewhere.
No Christian should need proof of how different the ground of the gospel is from the intervention of Jehovah that the prophet describes here. The Lord Jesus, the Son of God, was sent as Man in the infinite love of God. All have rejected and crucified Him. Yet the judgment of sins and sinners was then and there laid on Him. God is so glorified in His sacrificial death that He can and does proclaim to everyone who believes: eternal life in His name, forgiveness of sins, justification, and salvation as everlasting as glory.
- Judgment purges. Judgment, not preaching, brings in the coming age of blessing. The false gods people chose — the oaks, the gardens — will not shelter them.
- Judgment divides. One day redeems Zion and her converts and takes vengeance on the wicked. One act, two outcomes, at Christ's appearing.
- Judgment starts at home. God's enemies here are the people who corrupted Zion from within, not outsiders.
- Judgment is dated. Writers place this in the day of the Lord, still ahead. They read it as the purification of Zion in the last days, not as the final judgment of the lost.
- Judgment already fell. The judgment of sins and sinners fell on Christ. Everyone who believes now receives forgiveness, justification, and life as lasting as glory.
For they shall be ashamed of the terebinths that ye have desired, and ye shall blush for the gardens that ye have chosen.
Isaiah closes his first chapter by pointing the people back to the trees and gardens they had picked for worship. Those chosen places, he says, will become their shame.
Start with the trees themselves. More than one Hebrew word lies behind "oaks."
There are four Hebrew words translated this way. They all appear to come from the same root, meaning "strong, hardy." Most often they refer to the oak, which lives to a great age... It is a symbol of strength, and gives shade from the heat of the sun.
The gardens carried a different reputation. Isaiah names them again later in his book.
Gardens were also secluded places of secret sin. Isa. 65:3; Isa. 66:17.
Hills and wooded places felt religious. The setting itself worked on the imagination.
Israel's departure from God took an outward form: they made themselves "high places." It was only a heathen habit. It played on the imagination with a worship that has no heart in it. Men still try to satisfy themselves the same way — with music, architecture, drapery, and that most typical "dim religious light." And in it they worship a God who is Light itself, and in whom there is no darkness at all... On the mountain tops a man could imagine himself nearer to God than in the valleys. The depths of groves and forests helped too, along with the beauty of nature. They made him think he was nearer to the God of nature than he really was... And it is just here that man so often makes the fatal mistake. He puts what is only natural in the place of what is spiritual, and so deceives himself. In heathenism these high places and groves turned, as was bound to happen, to evil instead of good, and the worst abominations of heathenism attached themselves to them.
The verse's two verbs, desired and chosen, are the charge. God had already told them where and how to bring their offerings.
Deuteronomy 12 opens with the words, "These are the statutes and rules that you shall be careful to do in the land." Then come the bans on the high places and groves, or gardens, and altars which the heathen nations had made. So God's way for them was to bring all their offerings to His place in Jerusalem, offering as He had commanded. But they preferred to worship the way they thought best. These verses describe the result.
Behind the rules stands a principle. Choosing is God's to do.
God must and does choose for Himself — a simple yet most important point. Worship of our own invention is intolerable. It ought to shock the Christian most of all. If it were only a question of man, nobody would think of choosing for another. Nobody likes that. People like to choose for themselves, as mere men. What an awful delusion it is, then, to choose for God — to let your own will govern you in matters of religion! We can all see how bad it was in Israel. But do we feel that it is still worse in the Christian? God has given no right to adopt doctrines, practices, ways, government, or any one thing that is not His expressed will for His children.
The shame comes with judgement, and it falls on worshippers and idols alike.
The judgement will mean the destruction of the transgressors. They may have forsaken the Lord and turned to false gods with their oaks and gardens. But these evil powers will be of no use to them. All will be consumed together.
The fulfilment lies far past Isaiah's own day.
The promise and the judgement go far beyond the events before and after the captivity in Babylon. The last fiery trial of Israel is in view, and grace will use it for spiritual refining... In that day Zion will be redeemed with judgement, and her converts with righteousness. At the same time God will carry out vengeance on the wicked and on her idols. This is a victory reserved for Christ's appearing at the end of the age.
- Desired. The oak stood for strength, long life and shade from the sun. Israel wanted its worship set among such trees.
- Chosen. God had named His place and His way; they preferred to worship according to their own thoughts. Choosing for God is the sin the verse names.
- Deceived. Groves and hilltops work on the imagination. The fatal mistake is putting the natural in the place of the spiritual. Gardens also served as secluded places of secret sin.
- Ashamed. The oaks and gardens will be of no use. Fire takes worshippers and idols together.
- Judged. The shame lands at Christ's appearing. Zion will be redeemed with judgement, and her idols will fall in the same hour.
For ye shall be as a terebinth whose leaf fadeth, and as a garden that hath no water.
Isaiah 1 ends with God naming what His people chose instead of Him. He then tells them what those choices will turn them into. Both pictures here come from the places where Israel worshipped idols, so the punishment takes the shape of the sin.
The oaks and gardens of the previous verse were places of false worship. The verse now says what becomes of the people and of the gods they turned to.
The judgment will mean the destruction of the transgressors. They may have forsaken the Lord and turned to false gods with their oaks and gardens, but these evil powers will avail them nothing. All will be consumed together.
The tree named here stood in Hebrew thought for durability. So the fading leaf cuts deep. The picture of lasting strength is losing its life.
There are four Hebrew words translated this way. They all seem to come from the same root, meaning "strong, hardy." They are mostly applied to the oak, which lives to a great age... It is a symbol of strength, and gives shade from the heat of the sun. Scholars take the word elah to mean the terebinth, though most versions translate it oak.
That is why some translations read "terebinth" here instead of "oak." The tree named differs; the point does not.
A garden in that part of the world lived or died by its water supply. So the second picture shows a people cut off from what keeps them alive.
In the East the gardens were plots of ground under cultivation, often enclosed by walls, where fruit and herbs were grown. Water was always necessary. So people described a fruitful place as well watered, "like the garden of the LORD." The garden also pictures great blessing: when God restores Israel, "their life shall be like a watered garden." Under God's judgements, though, they were like a garden that had no water.
The chapter does not end with the withered tree. This judgment has a purpose beyond destruction.
So the first chapter of the prophecy applies to the state of the Jews. It announces the judgment. It also gives hope beyond the judgment: God will purge His people by it. This will be the means of gathering the nations.
The reach of these words is not limited to the exile that Isaiah's hearers would soon face.
The promise and judgement go far beyond the circumstances before and after the Babylonian exile. The last fiery trial of Israel is in view. Grace will use it for spiritual refining. After that will come the time when God restores all things... But this is in no way the gospel as we know it now. That gospel is grace reigning through righteousness to eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord. Here God carries out destructive judgement on the evil, when the repentant remnant of the Jews enjoy His mercy.
The dry garden is not God's last word for Israel. The same prophet promises them the opposite.
The prophet compares Israel in their decline to "a garden without water." But in the day of their future restoration he can say to Israel, "you shall be like a watered garden, like a spring of water, whose waters do not fail"... And so the garden of the King has a "spring locked, a fountain sealed." It does not depend on the surrounding desert for its supply. The spring is within the garden. And so with the Lord's people; they have a secret source of supply, the Holy Spirit... It is possible to grieve the Spirit into silence, and then how parched our souls become.
The same principle reaches one person. Lean on anything in place of God, and the result is the same dryness.
Such is the sad result of leaning on the creature — barrenness, desolation, disappointment. Like the shrub in the desert. No refreshing showers, no dew from heaven, nothing but drought and sterility. How can it be otherwise when the heart is turned away from the Lord, the only source of blessing?
- Chosen — The oaks and gardens were idol sites. The people picked them over God, and those "gods" could do nothing when judgment fell.
- Become — What they chose is what they become: strength that fades like a leaf, life dried up like a garden with no water.
- Source — Water is the whole point of a garden. A soul or a nation turned from the Lord, the only source of blessing, can only end in drought.
- Purge — Judgment is not the last word. God uses it to purge His people. The verse looks to Israel's final fiery trial, not to the gospel as preached now.
- Watered — God promises the reverse: a watered garden with a spring that never fails. Believers today have that inner supply, but they can grieve it into silence.
And the strong shall be for tow, and his work a spark; and they shall both burn together, and there shall be none to quench [them].
Isaiah 1 sets out God's case against His people, and its last verse closes that case with fire. Who is "the strong," what is the work that sets him alight, and when does the burning come?
This verse ends a chapter that also promises Zion's recovery. One writer sums up its shape: threat and hope belong together.
So the first chapter of the prophecy applies to the state of the Jews. It announces the judgment. And it gives hope across the judgment: God will purge His people in it. This will be the means of gathering the nations.
Just before this, the chapter shames the people for the trees and gardens they had chosen for their worship. So the burning takes in both the object and the man behind it.
Finally Jehovah shows He must deal with His adversaries. He must also restore Zion Himself, when idols and their makers perish together under His mighty hand. Their present ruin contrasts with what it once was and what it is to be.
The second half of the verse turns on one Hebrew word. Translators have read it two ways: "the maker of it" or "his work." One writer weighs both and leaves the question open.
What is the force of poalo ("the maker of it")? Is it poalo, or po'lo ("his work")? In sense, "his work"; or, in general, the active man who works? "Maker of it" is difficult — maker of what?
Both readings end in the same place: a man and the thing he produced go up in one flame.
Take the reading "his work," and the verse reaches past carved images. It takes in all that human effort raises up. One commentator applies it to what he calls "man's day."
But God is not mocked, and His purposes are not in doubt. He has given all to Jesus. Man and his works are to be judged by Him. What now flourishes in "man's day" is the fruit of human effort, raised to exalt the sinful creature in his own esteem. It will be like lighted tow. In that day the breath of the Lord will kindle both the maker and his work into the flame of a lasting destruction.
The older translations say "tow" where the ESV says "tinder." Tow is loose fibre left from flax. It flares up and is gone. And no one puts this fire out: the same writer calls it a lasting destruction.
The same writer links the verse to the day when God judges by Jesus Christ. Maker and work burn together because they come to light together.
Everyone must give an account for the talents they received. Those who know and therefore love the Lord will give it willingly. Those who name Him only to deny Him in their works will give it unwillingly, yet of necessity (Titus 1:16)... God will judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ; both the maker and his work will be brought to light in that day (Rom. 2:16; Isa. 1:31, margin).
One writer places the fulfilment at Christ's appearing. He warns against reading the chapter as a picture of the gospel today.
The promise and judgment go far beyond the circumstances before and after the Babylonian captivity. The last fiery trial of Israel is in view, which grace will use for spiritual refining... But this is in no way the gospel as it is now. The gospel is grace reigning through righteousness to eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord. Here it is destructive judgment carried out on the evil, when the repentant remnant of the Jews enjoy God's mercy... It is a victory reserved for Christ's appearing at the close of the age. Jerusalem must be purged before God can make her a centre of the nations. It is Christ there in power that accounts for all.
- Chosen — the fire falls on what the people picked for themselves: their chosen trees and gardens, and the idols made to fill them.
- Made — maker and idol perish together; nothing a man produces outlives the man who produced it.
- Disputed — the Hebrew reads either "the maker of it" or "his work." Either way, worker and product share one flame.
- Manifested — God brings both the maker and his work to light by Jesus Christ. The same test reaches every life.
- Purged — the burning is not the end of the story but the road to it. God purges His people through judgment, and Zion rises on the far side.
The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem.
Isaiah 1 opened the book as a vision. Now a fresh heading stands over a new section, naming the prophet, his father, and the subject he saw. The verse looks like a simple label. But it answers two questions that shape the whole prophecy: what this message is, and who it is about.
The book's first verse called Isaiah's message a vision. Here he uses a different word for the same subject, and what follows speaks of good things still to come.
Isaiah 1 is introduced as a "vision;" Isaiah 2 is "the word;" but again concerning Judah and Jerusalem. The opening verses say more about the good things that will come when redemption by judgment takes place. The first thing is that the house of Jehovah will be established and lifted high. It is always so, and must be. God must have His rightful place, and from that place blessing will flow out to men.
Isaiah does not say he heard the word — he says he saw it. Two titles given to such men show God's side and the man's side.
The word translated "prophet" in the Old Testament comes from "bubbling or pouring forth." It points to God's action in inspiring him. "Seer" points to the vision that marked such men out.
The verse names its own subject, and that subject should govern the reader. Ignoring it has caused long-standing mistakes.
The first verse says that the vision was concerning Judah and Jerusalem. If readers had paid proper attention to this, they would not have assigned so many things to the church in the chapter headings, and they would have understood the prophecy better.
The verses that follow promise the law going out from Zion. Many people take them as a picture of the gospel spreading through missionary work.
No doubt we have all often heard this passage quoted at missionary meetings and on other similar occasions, quoted in connection with the spread of the gospel. But however important missions and the spread of the gospel may be — and I would never undervalue them for a moment — they are not the subject of the passage before us, and they are in no way connected with it. This passage records "the word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem." Judah and Jerusalem are the subject, not the Church and its missions. "Out of Zion," not out of the Church, "shall go forth the law: and the word of the Lord," not from Britain, but "from Jerusalem."
The prophecy under this heading appears almost word for word in Micah. Commentators have argued over which prophet had it first.
Clearly we have here the same prediction, or nearly the same, that Micah gives in his prophecy (Micah 4:1-3). The two prophets lived at the same time. So the question comes up: who first delivered it from God? Three answers are possible... The certain fact is that one prophet uses another prophet's words, with only the changes the inspiring Spirit was pleased to allow. We find Daniel doing the same, drawing light from the word of Jehovah to Jeremiah, still waiting to be fulfilled (Daniel 9:2).
This title stands over more than one chapter. Glory stands at each end of the section, with something very different in between.
Isaiah 2-4. Here the kingdom, pictured as "a mountain," is looked for at the beginning, and shown in some of its glories at the end. But corruption and judgment are the main material of this burden in the middle, between that opening and closing in glory. Yet the remnant appear for a moment (Isaiah 3:10)... Scripture gives the judgment of God its usual title, "the day of the Lord."
That order matters for anyone who reads the promise on its own. The chapter itself shows what brings the blessing in.
If you take the trouble to read that chapter, you will find that it is about Judah and Jerusalem. It describes the blessing as brought in by the dreadful judgment of Jehovah. Men will go into the clefts of the rocks for fear of Jehovah and for the glory of His majesty, when He rises to shake the earth terribly. No wonder the Spirit of God adds, "Cease from man."
- Source. The message is not Isaiah's own. He saw it. "Prophet" points to God pouring the message out; "seer" points to the vision the man received.
- Subject. God names the topic Himself: Judah and Jerusalem. That subject is the key to the chapter.
- Safeguard. Reading the first verse with care stops readers from handing these chapters to the church. The law goes out from Zion, not from any missionary centre.
- Shared. The same prophecy stands in Micah 4. One prophet used another's words with the Spirit's approval, just as Daniel later drew on Jeremiah.
- Sequence. Chapters 2-4 open and close in glory, with corruption and judgment in between. The blessing comes through the day of the Lord, not before it.
And it shall come to pass in the end of days, [that] the mountain of Jehovah's house shall be established on the top of the mountains, and shall be lifted up above the hills; and all the nations shall flow unto it.
Isaiah's second chapter opens with a picture of the world's future: one mountain raised above all the rest, with the nations streaming toward it. It raises three questions — which mountain, which "last days," and has any of it happened yet?
The verse names a place, not an idea. One writer names the mountain and sets it apart from the New Jerusalem. He also contrasts that coming day with the city's state now:
The meaning seems to be the supremacy that God will give, in the last days, to Mount Moriah. That mountain is the seat and centre of the worship of Jehovah, just as Zion was and will be the seat of royalty, given in the grace of God after man's king had failed. When the mountain of Jehovah's house is lifted above all rivals, great or small, all nations will flow to it. For the city of the great king — the earthly Jerusalem under the Messiah and the New Covenant — is the appointed capital of the world during the millennium. The New Jerusalem of John is another and higher thing, and this passage does not refer to it. What is predicted stands in contrast with what is going on now. Now the house is left desolate, Jerusalem is trampled down by the nations, and nation rises against nation.
The same phrase in the New Testament points to a very different time:
The familiar term "the last days" is found in both the Old and New Testaments, but it does not always point to the same time. In 2 Timothy 3:1 we read, "But understand this, that in the last days there will come times of difficulty." Read on in that passage, and you find many of the features we see around us today. This confirms that the "last days" of 2 Timothy 3:1 are the closing days of the history of the church, just before the rapture. But when the Old Testament uses this expression, it points to the period after the removal of the church.
Many read verse 2 as a forecast of worldwide missionary success. One writer heard it used that way and answered from the prophecy's own address:
No doubt we have all often heard this passage quoted at missionary meetings and on other such occasions, quoted in connection with the spread of the gospel. Missions and the spread of the gospel may be very important, and God forbid that I should undervalue them for a moment. But they are not the subject of the passage before us, and they are not connected with its subject in any way… Judah and Jerusalem are the subject, not the Church and its missions. "Out of Zion," not out of the Church, "shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD," not from Britain, but "from Jerusalem."
The next verses give a second reason. What God does to the nations here is not what the gospel does:
Some might think that the law goes out of Zion by the gospel. But the gospel does not work by carrying out judgment on the nations, as it is here. God will deal with the nations by public judgment and righteousness on earth. The subject here is not the church but the Lord, and this has clearly never happened yet.
The picture of nations flowing runs against nature:
Rivers flow down; that is their natural course. But the peoples will flow up, around the sanctuary of Jehovah — then indeed a house of prayer for all. The change will be supernatural everywhere. Heaven and earth will gladly bear witness to the glory and the power of Jehovah… That day will proclaim the Lord. It will sweep away everything man takes pride in. It will prove that, though man may have done his best, the time has come for God to show a greatness no one can dispute.
Notice the order in the verse. God lifts the house first, before a single nation moves:
The first thing is that the house of Jehovah will be established and exalted. This is always the way, and it must be. God must have His rightful place, and from that place blessing will flow out to men.
Verse 2 opens a passage that ends in worldwide peace. So how does that peace arrive? Not by human effort:
What ends the strife and wars that have ruined the earth for so many ages? Not the slow, gradual spread of peaceful principles. It is God stepping in with judgment at the coming of the Lord… Does the Spirit say, "Make every effort — put out all your energy — work with all your might to fill society with principles that will bring in the golden age of peace and harmony"? No, my friends, it is this: "Be still, and know that I am God. I will be exalted among the nations, I will be exalted in the earth!"
- Established — God lifts His house first, above every rival. He takes His rightful place before anything else can move.
- Exalted — the mountain is Mount Moriah, the centre of worship, and the city is Jerusalem on earth, the world's capital under the Messiah. It is not the New Jerusalem, and not the church.
- Flowing — the nations move uphill, against the way rivers run. Only God can bring that about.
- Timing — Isaiah's "last days" are not the hard last days of 2 Timothy 3. The two phrases point to different times.
- Method — peace comes when God steps in with judgment, not through missions or slow progress. He will be exalted; man will not.
And many peoples shall go and say, Come, and let us go up to the mountain of Jehovah, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths. For out of Zion shall go forth the law, and Jehovah's word from Jerusalem.
Isaiah looks ahead to a day when many nations go up to Jerusalem. Nobody drives them there; they come to be taught. Two questions follow: when does this happen, and why from Zion?
Commentators agree that this scene has not yet arrived. One writer says it of the whole passage, not just this verse.
It is a great mistake to think that Isaiah 2:2-4 is yet accomplished.
Why not? Some read the law going out of Zion as the spread of the gospel. One writer answers that the two work in different ways.
Some might think that the law goes out of Zion through the gospel. But the gospel does not work by carrying out judgment on the nations, as this passage does. God will deal with the nations by public judgment and righteousness on earth (vv. 1-4). The passage speaks of the Lord, not of the church, and this has clearly never happened yet.
The verse says "law," not "gospel," and it names a real city. One writer holds both words to their plain sense.
The prophet does not say that the gospel goes out of Zion, as it does now, but that the law shall go out of Zion. It is not the Father's word, which we know, but Jehovah's word from Jerusalem. Even those who turn the passage into a symbol are not bold enough to deny that Jerusalem here means the real Jerusalem. Yet they drop that at once and slip in the gospel and the church... It is "the kingdom"; and the Great King will judge among the nations, and will rebuke many peoples.
Zion has a history of its own. It was not the temple site, and one writer sets it against Sinai, the mountain where the law was given.
Zion was not the place of the temple. It was the place of royalty — but first of all, the place of grace. It was where God was linked, in grace, with the earth before the temple was built, and where David had prepared a place for the ark. It stands in contrast with Sinai, the place of law for the earth. And from Zion, too, the law was to go out in grace, from the city of the great King.
The nations come freely. One writer links that to what they will have seen God do.
They need no force then, no incentives, and no rivalry. They have seen Jehovah's hand lifted up; they have seen His arm laid bare. His judgments have been in the earth, and the people of the world are now learning righteousness.
One writer finds a preview in an older story: a woman from outside Israel who travelled to Jerusalem to hear Solomon's wisdom.
In this honoured woman from outside Israel we have a sample, or picture, of the nations later on. She lived in the days of Solomon, the son of David — the days of a glory that was only a picture. She went up to Jerusalem, looking for the wisdom that was in the Lord's anointed one. In the same way, in the age of the real glory, the thousand-year reign of the true Solomon, the nations will wait in that same city, with the same desire and purpose of heart.
One writer identifies the teacher here as the God of Israel, who has become man.
The "He" who reigns like this is Jehovah. But having become man, He is also the Messiah, the Son of Man, given universal rights.
The verse is often read out in support of missionary work. One writer draws a firm line between Zion and the church, and between Jerusalem and any country that sends missionaries.
Missions and the spread of the gospel may be very important, and God forbid that I should undervalue them for a moment. But they are not the subject of the passage before us, and they are not connected with its subject in any way... "Out of Zion," not out of the Church, "shall go forth the law: and the word of the Lord," not from Britain, but "from Jerusalem." ... Ours is a far higher calling — a heavenly one; a calling above earthly things and earthly scenes altogether.
- Place — The verse names a literal city. The law goes out from Zion, not the gospel from the church. Do not swap the words.
- Grace — Zion is the place of royalty and of grace, set against Sinai, the place of law. So the law goes out from it in grace, from the city of the great King.
- Teacher — The one who teaches is Jehovah Himself. He became man, and He reigns as Messiah, the Son of Man.
- Learners — The nations arrive without compulsion or incentive. They have seen God's judgments in the earth. They come wanting to be taught, just as one visitor to Solomon pictured long before.
- Timing — Commentators agree this has never yet happened. The verse describes a coming kingdom on earth, not the work Christians are given now. Their calling is a heavenly one.
And he shall judge among the nations, and shall reprove many peoples; and they shall forge their swords into ploughshares, and their spears into pruning-knives nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.
Isaiah's opening chapter is full of a nation's failure. Then the prophet sees the end of the road: a settled world, where weapons become farm tools and no one studies war any longer. The commentators press three simple questions. Who is the "He" that judges? When does this happen? How does it come?
Everything in the verse hangs on one Person. One writer identifies Him:
The "He" who reigns like this is Jehovah. But having become man, He is also the Messiah, and the Son of man, with universal rights given to Him.
One writer shows how far His rule reaches:
His wisdom will settle every problem and put every wrong right. The groaning creation will reach the end of its pain and will rejoice in the power and presence of Emmanuel.
One writer is blunt — this is still future:
It is a great mistake to think that Isaiah 2:2-4 has already been fulfilled.
Another writer answers a common misuse of the passage — reading it as a promise about missionary work:
However important missions and the spread of the gospel may be — and God forbid that I should undervalue them for a moment — they are not the subject of this passage, and they are not connected with it in any way. This passage records "the word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem." Judah and Jerusalem are the subject, not the Church and its missions. "Out of Zion," not out of the Church, "shall go forth the law: and the word of the Lord," not from Britain, but "from Jerusalem."
The judging comes before the disarming. One writer says what actually brings wars to an end:
Wars have laid the earth waste for age after age. What puts an end to them, and brings in the time of universal peace, is not the slow and gradual progress of peaceful principles. It is God solemnly stepping in with judgment at the coming of the Lord. And what lesson does the Holy Spirit draw from all this? Is it, "Make every effort — put out all your energy — work with all your might to fill society with principles that will bring in the golden age of universal agreement, harmony and peace"? No, it is this: "Be still, and know that I am God. I will be exalted among the nations, I will be exalted in the earth."
One writer explains why organised peace efforts cannot produce this result:
This, according to the Bible, is the reign of peace — then, and not before. Meanwhile all the efforts of peace societies are at best a pleasant illusion, at worst an unbelieving confidence in man, and always ignorance of God's word… Wars certainly have their roots in the passions and lusts of man. To escape the bad fruit you must first make the tree good. But the day of the Lord will deal with man in righteousness and power, and peace will follow according to His mind and glory.
Another writer names the reason wars keep going:
Riots, bloodshed, turmoil, strife and crime continue in the world to this day, despite all its boasted progress. The reason is that men reject the rightful King. They will not own the Prince of Peace. They will not have Jesus as Lord.
Elsewhere in Scripture the same picture runs backwards, and one writer sets the two side by side:
Nations will some day no longer turn, as they do now, their plowshares into swords, but change their swords into plowshares. Righteousness and peace will surely kiss each other and creation's curse and travail pains will end.
One writer describes what people will do instead of fighting:
That age of peace will be an age of farming. Men will go back to the land, and God's original purpose for man on the earth will come into effect (Genesis 2:15). The forge and the anvil will no longer groan and ring out the death of millions. They will ring out their gladness along with the songs of the field and vineyard.
The same writer turns the two tools on the believer's conduct today:
As for the nations, we cannot escape the sorrow and strife they are caught up in, though in spirit we may be apart from it. But God has set us in His field (1 Corinthians 3), which is His assembly. We are not there to use the sword and spear of party strife, but the ploughshare and the pruning hook, as workers together with God in His garden.
- Judge first. Peace begins with a Person — Jehovah, become man, judging between the nations.
- Judgment, then ploughshares. Wars end by God's intervention at the coming of the Lord, not by the slow spread of peaceful principles.
- Bad tree, bad fruit. Wars grow out of the passions of man, so peace schemes stay an illusion until the tree itself becomes good.
- Zion, not Britain. The prophecy is about Judah and Jerusalem, not the church's missionary work. It is not yet fulfilled.
- Ploughshares now. Until that day, the believer works God's field with plough and pruning hook, not with the sword of strife.
House of Jacob, come ye, and let us walk in the light of Jehovah.
Isaiah has just pictured Zion as the centre of blessing and peace for all nations, and then that vision turns into an appeal the prophet includes himself in. Why does a picture of the world's future peace become a call to the house of Jacob right now?
The vision has a target: the people listening to it. One writer rules out reading it as something the gospel or the church fulfils, then shows the prophet turning to present duty.
It has no basis, and shows no discernment, to treat this as fulfilled in the mission of the gospel or the calling of the church, or even as applying to them... What follows in Isaiah 2 fits the future blessing and glory of Israel under the new covenant, and the King who will reign in righteousness. So in verse 5, after that happy picture of the new age, the prophet says, "O house of Jacob, come, let us walk in the light of the LORD." Think of that vision of glory, when the Gentiles would bow and bless the LORD. How it should shame Judah now!
So why did they need such a call? The appeal stands between a promise of blessing and the reason God had withheld it.
Once Zion, the mountain of the LORD, is re-established, it will be the centre of blessing and peace to all the nations (Isaiah 2:1-4). This puts an invitation into the prophet's mouth: he calls the people to come and walk in the light of the LORD. Why has He forsaken His people? Because they have learned the ways of the nations around them.
Judah already had other lights to walk by: their idols. So the call names a choice between rival lights, and one writer carries that choice into our own day.
The prophet pleads with the house of Jacob to leave the false lights of their idolatries and walk in "the light of the LORD." That is what they will do when the coming age arrives. It is our privilege today, for God has brought us into the light as children of light, and of the day that will dawn when Christ appears.
Some read prophecy only as a timetable of coming events. Isaiah's appeal points to another reason God tells us the future.
God always has a present purpose in the revelations He gives. He sets the past against the future. His aim is practical sanctification in the present: ceasing to do evil and learning to do well. Isaiah first describes the glory of the millennial age, then urges the people, "O house of Jacob, come, let us walk in the light of the LORD."
People can refuse this invitation. One writer watched the world pour its best minds into weapons, and traced that ruin back to the refusal.
All the efforts of men to bring in such a state of things have completely failed. They boasted with proud presumption in the great achievements of science and education, and imagined these would lift them at last into a millennium of human glory. Instead those achievements are now pushed to their limits to devise fresh and more frightful ways of destroying life... The roar of the furnace at home and the shrieking of the shells over the battlefields are only the echoes of the laughter of demons over the blindness of men. They thought they were wise when they chose their own way and refused to walk in the light of the LORD.
The chapter ends by telling us to stop reckoning on man. One writer draws that out as the practical result of verse 5.
As it was with Israel in Isaiah's day, so in the world today: everything caters to man, and man is magnified. But if we "walk in the light of the LORD" (verse 5), we see how little he is, and we "cease from man." He is only a dying creature because of his sin. Before God he counts for nothing in himself. In the light of the cross of Christ we know he is worse than nothing. How amazing, then, is the grace that has stooped to bless people like ourselves.
- Vision. Zion's coming reign of peace is the setting. Verse 5 is the appeal that vision produces, and the gap between Judah's future glory and her present state was meant to shame her.
- Invitation. The prophet does not command from a distance — he says "let us," placing himself inside the call to walk in God's light.
- Rival light. The choice was between the LORD's light and the false lights of idolatry. Judah had learned those ways from the nations, and that is why God had forsaken His people.
- Purpose. Prophecy has a present purpose. God shows the future glory so that His people live holy lives now, ceasing to do evil and learning to do well.
- Result. Refuse the light and human wisdom ends in ruin. Walk in it and man shrinks to his true size, so that God's grace toward him looks amazing. The invitation belongs to the coming age — and to believers now, already children of light.
For thou hast cast off thy people, the house of Jacob, because they are filled [with what comes] from the east, and use auguries like the Philistines, and ally themselves with the children of foreigners.
Isaiah has just described a coming age of glory, when the nations come to the Lord. Then he turns to Judah as it was in his own day, and gives the reason God had rejected the very people He meant to set on high.
The prophet has just pictured the coming age. Then he turns and tells God what the people had become.
How should the vision of glory, when the Gentiles would bow and bless Jehovah, shame Judah now! Then he speaks directly to Him. He owns why Jehovah had forsaken His people instead of setting them on high: they were filled "from (or, more than) the east" with everything that man craves and worships. Their sin had no excuse. Judah had such glorious prospects from God's sure word, yet chased heathen superstitions — not only Gentile wealth and power, but their idols too.
The verses just after this one list what came in, and where it left the land.
The prophet returns to the existing state of the people in verses 6-9. From other peoples they had imported various forms of spiritist practices. They were prosperous in material things: plenty of silver and gold and treasures, and also horses. Horses were a luxury forbidden to Israel's kings, according to Deuteronomy 17:16. All this led to the land being full of idols, before which both poor and great bowed down. Truly a deplorable state of things.
The Philistines were Israel's neighbours on the coast. When they needed answers, this is who they went to.
They turn for advice to their diviners, for which the Philistines were famed (Isa. 2:6).
Isaiah returns to this practice later in his book. He also shows what it pushed aside.
They were turning to the spiritist practices of the heathen, with mediums and fortune-tellers. They tried to get guidance for the living from those who were dead. Yet the law and the testimony were available to them, with light from God shining in them. If they did not speak according to that, there would be "no light in them"; or, "for them there is no daybreak."
The verse ends with hands struck with the children of foreigners. One writer follows that link down to the fall of the kingdom, through Zephaniah's warning about the royal family's clothes.
Zephaniah prophesied during the reign of Josiah. He had something special to say about the young princes and the king's children... "I will punish the officials and the king's sons and all who array themselves in foreign attire" (Zeph. 1:8). In our days young people feel a great pull to clothe themselves with strange apparel. But they will do well to remember, and their parents too: this strange apparel was part of the cause of the awful downfall of the kingdom of Judah. About 150 years earlier, Isaiah had warned Israel of judgment to come because "they are full of things from the east."
The verse reads as though the rejection has already happened. But had it happened yet, and would judgment stop with Judah?
The rejection of the people had not yet happened. Judgment begins at the house of God, but it does not stop there. God will judge His people; and will He not judge the idolatrous world?
The verse names the house of Jacob. One writer takes that name as an argument against reading the chapter as a picture of the church.
Not even those who turn this into an allegory are bold enough to deny that Jerusalem here is literal. Yet they leave that behind in a moment and insert the gospel and the church. Yet in verse 6 the prophet goes on to say, "You have rejected your people, the house of Jacob." How can that be said of the church? This is "the kingdom."
- Contrast. God's promise of glory comes first. Set against it, Judah's present state looks worse, not better.
- Import. Everything at fault was borrowed. Judah took in practices, wealth, horses and gods from the nations around until the land was full of them.
- Substitute. Asking fortune-tellers meant seeking the dead for guidance. God's word was already at hand, so those who turned from it had no daybreak.
- Alliance. Striking hands with foreigners showed even in clothing. Foreign dress marked where the hearts of Judah's princes lay, and it helped bring the kingdom down.
- Warning. God passed sentence before the blow fell. Judgment starts with His own people, and it does not stop there.
And their land is full of silver and gold, and there is no end of their treasures their land also is full of horses, and there is no end of their chariots.
Isaiah lists Judah's silver, gold, horses and chariots. This is not a boast. It is evidence in a case against the nation, and it explains why God set His own people aside. The question is how full treasuries became a charge instead of a blessing.
The list sits inside words spoken to God, which give the reason He turned away from His people.
Then the prophet speaks straight to Him. He admits why Jehovah had forsaken His people instead of setting them on high. It was because they were filled "from (or, more than) the east" with everything man craves and worships… Their sin was completely inexcusable. Judah had glorious prospects from God's sure word, yet they went after the superstitions of the nations around them — not only their wealth and power, but sadly, their idols too.
Another writer reads the list plainly: this was a rich nation.
They were prosperous in material things. They had plenty of silver and gold and treasures, and horses too. Horses were a luxury that Deuteronomy 17:16 forbade to Israel's kings. All this led to the land being full of idols, and both poor and great bowed down before them. It was a truly terrible state of things.
Horses and chariots sound harmless to us. The charge only makes sense once you know an earlier command.
Again, in Isaiah 2:7, he complains, "Their land is filled with horses, and there is no end to their chariots." And in Isaiah 31:1 he pronounces a woe against those "who go down to Egypt for help and rely on horses, who trust in chariots because they are many and in horsemen because they are very strong." Without the first five books of the Bible it would be hard to explain the sin of having horses and chariots. Deuteronomy 17:16 tells us that Jehovah forbade both owning them and sending down to fetch them.
Another writer traces the ban back to Egypt itself.
This is why God forbade them to multiply horses. Egypt was famous for its horses and chariots, and the Lord's command to the king takes note of it: "Only he must not acquire many horses for himself or cause the people to return to Egypt in order to acquire many horses, since the Lord has said to you, 'You shall never return that way again.'" Their redemption from Egypt and all its power should have been final. Nothing should have tempted them to return.
The next verse says the land was full of idols too. One writer sets the two "fulls" side by side.
"Their idols are silver and gold, the work of human hands," says the psalmist (Psalm 115:4). "Their land is filled with silver and gold… their land is filled with idols," says the prophet (Isaiah 2:7-8). What a man thinks is most precious, what his heart craves, what feeds his glory — he makes it into a god. That is the root of idolatry. In lifting up his idol he pushes God out and lifts himself up.
The prophet's own response to this chain is not analysis. It is outrage.
Their land was full of silver and gold, with no end of treasures. It was full of horses and chariots. And it was also full of idols! What sin and shame! "So man is humbled, and each one is brought low — do not forgive them!" (v. 9), cries the indignant prophet.
A writer on hoarded riches sends his readers back to this very chapter.
The reader will do well to compare Isaiah 2:7 to the end of the chapter… That day will deal with everyone who is proud and lofty, and with everyone who is lifted up. It will deal with every high tower and every fortified wall, with all the ships of Tarshish and all the beautiful works of art. God is against their cherished wealth and their endless store of clothing… The selfish unbelief that stored up treasure in closing days was no small thing in God's sight.
Chariots have changed shape; the temptation has not.
In all men's activities they need some means of help or support, and in battle they find horses of great benefit. Of course now they need motorised equipment. But whether horses or tanks, these are no guarantee of success. Deliverance comes only from the Lord. We are indeed slow to learn this elementary lesson.
- Full — of the wrong things. The verse counts a nation's fullness: silver, gold, treasures, horses, chariots. The next verse names the fullness it all produced — idols.
- Forbidden. Horses and chariots look innocent until you read Deuteronomy 17:16. Piling them up meant going back to Egypt, the country God had brought them out of.
- Fashioned. Whatever the heart craves most, it makes into a god. Man lifts up the work of his own hands and pushes God out of His place.
- Forsaken. The prophet tells God why He had forsaken His people instead of setting them on high. Judah had God's sure word, yet reached for other nations' wealth, power and gods.
- Falling. The coming day deals with the very things man boasts in: high towers, fortified walls, hoarded treasure. Deliverance was never in the chariots, then or now.
And their land is full of idols; they bow themselves down to the work of their own hands, to that which their fingers have made.
Isaiah lists what filled Judah's land: silver, gold, horses, chariots — and then idols. That last item exposes the rest, and it raises two questions: why does a rich nation bow to what it made, and what does God do about it?
Just before this, Isaiah shows a coming day of glory. One writer sets that day beside Judah's present state, and names why God had forsaken His people.
The vision of glory, when the Gentiles would bow and bless Jehovah — how it should shame Judah now! The prophet then owns why Jehovah had forsaken His people instead of setting them on high: because they were filled from the east with everything man craves and worships. … Their sin was completely unpardonable. Judah had such glorious prospects from God's sure word, yet they chased after heathen superstitions — not only Gentile wealth and power, but sadly their idols as well.
Verses 7 and 8 say three times that the land was full: silver and gold, horses, then idols. One writer traces how the first led to the last.
They had imported various forms of spiritist practices from other peoples. They were prosperous in material things: plenty of silver and gold and treasures, and also horses. Horses were a luxury forbidden to Israel's kings, according to Deuteronomy 17:16. All this led to the land being full of idols, before which both poor and great bowed themselves down. Truly a deplorable state of things.
"The work of their hands" is not a throwaway description. Scripture keeps that phrase for one thing.
"The works of their hands" is a phrase used only of heathen idolatry (Isa. 2:8; Jer. 1:16; 25:6-7, 14; Deut. 4:28; Ps. 115:4-7; 135:15).
Notice also what the idols were made of. The same metals listed in verse 7 reappear as gods in verse 8. One writer traces that back to its source in the human heart.
"Their idols are silver and gold, the work of human hands," says the psalmist (Ps. 115:4). "Their land is filled with silver and gold … their land is filled with idols," says the prophet (Isa. 2:7-8). Man makes a god out of whatever he counts most precious, whatever his heart craves, whatever serves his glory. That is the root of idolatry. In exalting his idol, man pushes God out and exalts himself. An awful degradation follows, as the first chapter of Romans tells us (Rom. 1:25).
The verse shows them bowing to something they made. That position tells you where they have put themselves.
He blindly forgets that he must put himself lower than the god he worships — even the lowest of creeping things. So the objects of his worship bear vivid witness to his own wretched degradation.
Judah's idols are not the end of the story. Writers point ahead to a wider return to idol worship, and to the trust it will call for.
We read that most nations will return to this sin and worship idols again (Isa. 2:20; Isa. 17:7-8; Isa. 30:22; Isa. 31:7; Hosea 14:3). And the call to trust in Jehovah will be needed all the more. In that day those who fall away will be prosperous on the outside, with more than the heart could wish.
Isaiah does not leave the handmade gods standing. Later in the same chapter, the very people who served them throw them away.
It is the day of the Lord upon all the pride of man, to bring it low. It is the day when every refuge of lies will be swept away, and all the emptiness of his thoughts exposed. "The idols He shall utterly abolish." Yes, those who were once their slaves will fling them to the moles and to the bats. "And the Lord alone will be exalted in that day." Then the way opens for blessing, as wide as the judgment that came before it.
The line "The idols He shall utterly abolish" comes from an older translation of Isaiah 2:18. The ESV reads, "And the idols shall utterly pass away."
- Full — but empty. Judah's land was full of silver, full of horses, then full of idols. The wealth came first, and it led to the idols.
- Craving makes gods. Whatever a person prizes most, and whatever feeds his glory, he turns into a god. Idolatry starts in the craving, not in the carving.
- Made, then obeyed. They bowed to what their own fingers had made. Scripture uses that phrase for heathen idolatry — and here it describes God's own people.
- Down, not up. Displacing God to exalt man never lifts man. He ends up lower than the thing he kneels to.
- One exalted at the end. The day of the Lord abolishes the idols. Their former slaves fling them to the moles and bats, the Lord alone is exalted, and then blessing comes.
And the mean man shall be bowed down, and the great man shall be brought low and do not thou forgive them!
Isaiah has just described a land packed with silver, horses and idols, and here he gives his verdict on the people living in it. Two questions press: who exactly is bowing, and how can a prophet of God ask that they not be forgiven?
The verse names two classes. Older translations call them "the mean man" and "the great man" — the ordinary person and the important one. Both ends of society end up in the same posture. One writer traces how they got there:
The prophet returns to the present state of the people in verses 6-9. From other peoples they had imported various forms of spiritism. They were rich in material things: plenty of silver and gold and treasures. They also had horses, a luxury forbidden to Israel's kings in Deuteronomy 17:16. All this led to the land being full of idols, and both poor and great bowed low before them. A truly sad state of things.
These words are not God's sentence. They are the prophet's cry, forced out of him by what he has just described. The guilt is heavy because of the gap between what God had promised Judah and what Judah went after:
Judah's sin could not be pardoned. God's sure word had given them glorious prospects, yet they went after the superstitions of the nations — not only Gentile wealth and power, but sadly their idols too. […] Their land was full of silver and gold, with no end of treasures. It was full of horses and chariots. And it was full of idols as well! Oh what sin and shame! "And the mean man is bowed down, and the great man is brought low: therefore forgive them not" (v. 9), cries the indignant prophet.
Verse 9 says they are humbled and brought low. No enemy did that to them; their own worship did. There is a principle behind it:
The people are plainly taught this: when they made an image and bowed down to it, they really lowered and corrupted themselves. So when they made the golden calf, the Lord told Moses to go down, because the people Moses had brought out of Egypt had corrupted themselves. It could not be otherwise. The worshipper must be lower than the object he worships. So in worshipping a calf, they put themselves below the level of the animals that perish.
The bowing does not stop with the idols. What men do to themselves now, God will do to them in His day:
The true God would break down those who bowed down to idols. The hand of the Highest will be on all that is high and lifted up. The idols will pass away for good. Men will go into caves and holes, away from the terror of Jehovah and from the glory of His majesty, when He rises to shake the earth with power. All will be verified when Christ appears, not before.
Isaiah is speaking to God's own people. That raises the obvious question about everyone else. One writer puts the logic plainly:
The rejection of the people had not yet happened. Judgment begins at the house of God, but does not stop there. God will judge His people; and will He not judge the idolatrous world?
The chapter closes with practical advice: stop leaning on man. The man to give up is the very one this verse describes:
This does not mean Christ, or man in Christ. It means man in nature — man who exalts himself and yet loves idols. "Stop regarding man in whose nostrils is breath, for of what account is he?" That breath is easily put out, as far as life here is concerned. The man whose pride and idolatry are to meet so striking a doom in the day of the Lord can never be a support to lean on.
There is a cure for over-valuing man:
The more they grasp the greatness of God, the less man will appear to be in their estimation.
- Bow. Poor and great alike bowed low before the idols that filled the land.
- Sink. That bowing was self-inflicted ruin. A worshipper is always lower than what he worships, so an image drags him below himself.
- Guilt. Judah held God's sure promises and still chose idols. The prophet's indignant "do not forgive them" measures the shame of it.
- Reversal. What men do to themselves before idols, God will do to them in His day: the high brought low, the idols gone for good.
- Cease. So stop leaning on man. His breath is easily put out, and the greatness of God cuts him down to size.
Enter into the rock, and hide thee in the dust, from before the terror of Jehovah, and from the glory of his majesty.
Isaiah has just described a coming age when nations stream to the mountain of the LORD and beat their swords into ploughshares. From verse 10 the tone changes. How does that peace arrive — by the world slowly improving, or by a day when God rises and brings down every high thing in man?
The commentators place this verse in a day that has not yet come. It does not describe an ancient invasion. It does not picture the gospel slowly civilising the world.
He calls on them to hide in the dust because of the day of the LORD. There is no doubt that day has not yet fallen on the pride and idolatry of man. Read this passage in a believing spirit, and any fair mind will be convinced. Neither Nebuchadnezzar nor Titus on the one hand, nor the gospel on the other, has anything to do with the Lord's coming to carry out the all-embracing judgment of man pictured here. The true God would break down those who bowed down to idols. The hand of the Highest would be on everything high and lifted up. The idols will pass away completely, and men will go into caves and holes from before the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of His majesty, when He rises to shake the earth. All will be verified when Christ appears, not before.
That day has two targets: human greatness, and the things men worship instead of God. Darby adds that God's own people are not exempt.
The day of the LORD will be upon all the glory of man, and upon all his idols. They may well stop regarding man, for their own God will judge and strike down His people on the earth, the place of His rest.
The list of what falls under that day reaches into ordinary desires and pleasures.
The day of the LORD will fall on everything that has fed the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eye, and the pride of life. It will fall on everything men have delighted in, so as to shut God out and shut Christ out of their hearts. It will fall on everything that has fed the self-exaltation which has marked man all along, which marks him more and more now, and which marks this present day to a degree that is frightening to think about.
Trotter reads verse 10 as an open door: a call into the shelter God's faithful people already know.
Verse 10 invites everyone who has ears to hear. It calls them in where the remnant hide through the upheavals and terrors of that day. Their voice is the one we have been hearing in Psalm 46.
Later, men run to those same rocks uninvited, in panic. The difference is between bowing now and being broken then. Dennett describes the moment that puts all flesh to silence.
The prophet sees the LORD rising up out of the dwelling place of His holiness, coming out in judgment to carry out the purposes just announced. Seeing the effect on men, the prophet cries, "Be silent, all flesh, before the LORD." For when the day of His wrath comes, who will be able to stand? Isaiah cries out with the same event in view: "Enter into the rock and hide in the dust."
The peace of verses 1–4 and the terror of verse 10 are not rival pictures. One writer shows they are cause and effect.
The rest of the chapter goes on to show how this period of blessing comes in. Is it by grace proclaimed? No, but by fearful judgments carried out. This terrible shaking of the earth, and this bringing down of man's pride, has one result: "the LORD alone will be exalted in that day."
Verse 10 offers a rock and dust. Kelly turns that offer into a question, set against the moment when everyone sees Christ.
He comes with the clouds. Every eye will see Him, including those who pierced Him. All the tribes of the earth will mourn because of Him. Where then will the rock be, or the dust, to hide man from the LORD? For "the haughty looks of man shall be brought low… and the LORD alone will be exalted in that day."
- Future — this judgment has not happened yet. Commentators place it at Christ's appearing, not in past conquests or the spread of the gospel.
- Pride — that day targets everything lifted up: human glory, human greatness, and the idols men make to worship.
- Invitation — verse 10 calls people into the rock and the dust now. Later, men bolt for the same rocks in terror, uninvited and too late.
- Judgment — no one talks the world's promised peace into existence. God brings it in by rising to shake the earth, so that He alone is exalted.
- Question — the one left standing is Kelly's: when every eye sees Him, where will the rock be found to hide man from the LORD?
The lofty eyes of man shall be brought low, and the haughtiness of men shall be bowed down, and Jehovah alone shall be exalted in that day.
Isaiah 2 opens with the mountain of the Lord's house lifted above the hills, and the nations streaming to it. The prophet then turns to the road that leads there. Verse 11 sets two things side by side: the proud look of man brought down, and one Name left standing high "in that day."
The verse does not stand alone. It answers what the prophet has just described. Wealth and worship had gone together in the worst way.
If their land was full of silver and gold, and endless treasures; if it was full of horses and chariots, it was also full of idols! What sin and shame! "So man is humbled, and each one is brought low—do not forgive them!" (v. 9), cries the angry prophet.
Some read this humbling as something already done — by ancient conquerors, or by the spread of the gospel. One writer denies both, and points to a reversal: God will bow down those who bow to idols.
Read this passage in a believing spirit, and any fair mind will be convinced. Neither Nebuchadnezzar nor Titus on one side, nor the gospel on the other, has anything to do with the Lord's coming to carry out the judgment of all mankind pictured here. The true God would break down those who bowed down to idols. The hand of the Highest would be on all that is high and lifted up. It will all come true when Christ appears, and not before.
Scripture speaks of a "day" belonging to man and a "day" belonging to the Lord. This passage is where the second one is first named, and the two are exact opposites.
"Man's Day" (1 Cor. 4:3, margin) is that long period of human pride and self-will. It began when sin entered the world, and God's judgment will end it at the revelation of Jesus Christ. During Man's Day God is nothing, and man is all. The Day of the Lord will reverse the conditions. Isaiah 2:10-22 is the first passage of Scripture that names that Day. It vividly describes the complete overthrow of everything man has boasted in, so that Jehovah alone may be exalted. Terror will fill men's minds when this happens. All human schemes and achievements will fall to pieces, never to be patched up again.
The list that follows in the chapter — cedars, towers, walls, ships — shows how wide the sweep is. Open wickedness is not the only thing that goes. Some hope that man's progress will carry straight over into the age to come. One writer answers that hope.
The list of things on which the day of the Lord will fall in judgment is very impressive. It is clear: it will make a clean sweep of all the things in which fallen man boasts, even things pleasant and artistic. Some have imagined that this day will accept and even expand what man's inventive skill has produced, as the way into the millennial age. Instead it will remove those things, along with the idols and the idol-worshipping ideas that gave them birth.
The bringing low is not the end of the story. It clears ground, and what follows matches the scale of the clearing.
It is the day of the Lord on all the pride of man, to bring it low. It is the day when every refuge of lies will be swept away, and every empty thought of his laid bare. He will completely abolish the idols. Yes, those who were their slaves will throw them to the moles and the bats. "And the LORD alone will be exalted in that day." Then the way is open for blessing, as wide as the judgment that has brought it in.
Every proud look will come down in the end. What differs is how: the bowing can be a terror or a joy.
Grace bows our hearts now, and with joy we confess His name! Judgment will in that day break the proud spirit of the enemy.
- Cause. A land full of silver, gold and horses was also full of idols. The pride that bows to what it made is what God will bow down.
- Contrast. Two days stand against each other. In man's day God is nothing and man is all; the Lord's day reverses that.
- Reach. The sweep takes in more than obvious evil. Even what is pleasant and artistic goes, along with the ideas that produced it.
- Timing. Past conquerors did not carry out this judgment, and neither has the gospel. It waits for the Lord's coming.
- Result. Blessing follows, as wide as the judgment that opened the way. One Name stands exalted alone.
For there shall be a day of Jehovah of hosts upon everything proud and lofty, and upon everything lifted up, and it shall be brought low;
The LORD of hosts has set a day. Its target is not one nation or one crime, but everything high in the world of men. Isaiah puts pride itself in the path of judgment. When does that day come, what falls, and what stands afterwards?
One writer sets this day against the whole stretch of history running now.
The solemn winding up of Man's Day, and the ushering in of the Day of the Lord. "Man's Day" is that long period of human pride and self-will which began when sin entered the world, and divine judgment will end it at the revelation of Jesus Christ. During Man's Day God is nothing, and man is everything. The Day of the Lord will reverse the conditions. Isaiah 2:10-22 is the first passage of Scripture that names that Day. It describes in vivid detail the complete overthrow of everything man has boasted in, so that Jehovah alone may be exalted.
The difference comes down to who holds the upper hand.
From these and similar passages, we learn that "the day of the Lord" carries the deeply solemn thought of judgment on the world — on apostate Israel — on man and his ways — on everything the human heart prizes and longs after… Man has the upper hand now, the Lord will have the upper hand then.
The verse does not single out violence or theft. It singles out height. One writer traces this back to what pride actually does with God's gifts.
It is man, whom God has exalted in Christ, in His own gracious and wonderful way, but who, on the other hand, by self-exaltation debases himself to his own ruin… "Man's day" is a day of human aggrandisement with what he has robbed from God, and of self-exaltation by the very things God's mercy has enriched him with. And therefore the day of the Lord must fall "against all that is proud and lofty, against all that is lifted up."
Some say ancient conquerors already fulfilled this chapter. Others say the spread of Christian preaching does. One writer rejects both.
You only need to read this passage in a believing spirit, and it will convince any fair mind. Neither Nebuchadnezzar nor Titus, nor the gospel, has anything to do with the Lord's coming to carry out the all-embracing judgment of man pictured here… All of it will come true when Christ appears, not before.
This day falls on more than proud people. It falls on everything they built to shut God out.
The day of the Lord will come upon everything that has served the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eye, and the pride of life. It will come upon everything men have delighted in, so as to shut out God and exclude Christ from their hearts. It will come upon everything that has fed man's self-exaltation. That self-exaltation has marked him all along. It marks him more and more now, and it marks this day we live in to a frightening degree.
The verse ends with everything high brought low. That is not where it stops.
How good to know, in all that day of terror, that God is supreme above and within all the schemes of His enemies!… It is the day of the Lord upon all the pride of man, to bring it low. It is the day when every refuge of lies will be swept away and all the emptiness of his thoughts exposed. "The idols He shall utterly abolish." Yes, those who were their slaves will fling them to the moles and the bats. "And the Lord alone shall be exalted in that day." Then the way is prepared for blessing, as wide as the judgment that introduced it.
Pride is the target of that day. So the verse works as a mirror now, even on the effort to look humble.
Man delights in display. The testimony is simply to be lowly in heart. This is not natural to the mind. In trying to avoid display one may easily make an idol out of apparent humility. There is a humility of the flesh as well as a pride of the flesh, and both fall under the heading of pride. To work at appearing humble is to be proud… "The pride of life is not from the Father but is from the world." The world is passing away. So the pride of life must be passing too, because it is part of the world. It will meet its end in the day of the Lord.
- Man's day — the long stretch where man is everything and God counts for nothing. Isaiah 2 announces its close.
- Man's pride — the day is aimed at height itself: self-exaltation built out of the very gifts God gave.
- Man's props — it falls not only on proud people but on everything they delighted in to keep God out.
- Man's day still running — no past conqueror and no spread of preaching has ended it; it waits for Christ's appearing.
- God alone exalted — everything high comes down, and the Lord stands alone. Then blessing follows, as wide as the judgment that made room for it.
and upon all the cedars of Lebanon, high and lifted up, and upon all the oaks of Bashan;
Isaiah 2:13 sits inside a picture of the coming day of the Lord. The prophet names one tall thing after another and marks each for humbling — but is he talking about timber, or about people?
Scripture uses parts of a landscape as pictures of people. One writer lines up three of them.
In Scripture the earth stands for the nations under settled, stable government. The sea naturally suggests great crowds, and especially people in a state of disorder. A tree, on the other hand, is a well known Scripture figure for a great one of the earth.
Why a tree, and not some other figure? One writer points to the one thing a tree does.
Nothing lifts itself up the way a tree does, so the "tree" is singled out here: the axe is laid at its root.
The two trees are not interchangeable. One writer follows the cedar through Scripture, from a king's boast to a picture of the righteous.
In Scripture the cedar is always used to picture power or high standing, if not pride. When the king of Israel wanted to pour contempt on the king of Judah, he compared himself to a cedar and Judah's king to a thistle. The Psalmist uses it for the prosperity of the righteous: he will "grow like a cedar in Lebanon." When judgment comes on the great of the earth, the prophet Isaiah says it is the day of the Lord on the cedars of Lebanon. These mark the cedar as the symbol of dignity and power.
The oak stands for something other than the cedar's dignity.
The oaks of Bashan stand as a symbol of great strength and height, which God brings down in His judgment.
The verse is one item in a list that runs on through mountains, towers, walls, ships and works of art. One writer takes that sweep to its limit.
Even the grandeur of nature as it now is must fall. Still more the impressive buildings of man, which are small by comparison. What are their high towers and walled defences beside lofty hills and towering mountains? Strong, fine ships will be broken, and pleasant pictures will fade into nothing. The Lord alone will be exalted in that day.
The same day falls on more than rulers. It reaches what people love in place of God.
Everything that has served the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eye, and the pride of life — everything men have delighted in, so as to shut God out and keep Christ out of their hearts — everything that has fed the self-exaltation that has marked man all along… the day of the Lord will fall on all of it.
Some have read this chapter as fulfilled when armies took Jerusalem long ago. Others read it as the spread of the gospel. One writer rejects both.
You only need to read this passage in a believing spirit, and any fair mind will be convinced. Neither Nebuchadnezzar or Titus on the one hand, nor the gospel on the other, has anything to do with the Lord's coming to carry out the all-embracing judgment of man pictured here… All will be proved true when Christ appears, not before.
The cutting down is not the end of the story.
It is the day of the Lord on all the pride of man, to bring it low. It is the day when every refuge of lies will be swept away, and all the emptiness of his thoughts will be laid bare… "And the Lord alone will be exalted in that day." Then the way is open for blessing, as wide as the judgment that has brought it in.
- Height — a tree pictures a great one of the earth. It is singled out because nothing else lifts itself up the way a tree does.
- Cedar — Lebanon's cedar means dignity and power, the high standing of the world's great.
- Oak — Bashan's oak means sheer strength and height, the kind God brings down.
- Everything — the list runs past the trees. Nature's grandeur, man's towers, ships and treasured art all fall in the same day.
- Alone — the felling clears the ground. The Lord alone is exalted, and blessing follows as wide as the judgment that made room for it.
and upon all the lofty mountains, and upon all the hills that are lifted up;
Isaiah 2:14 sits in a long list of things the day of the Lord will level: mountains and hills stand there beside cedars, oaks, towers, walls and ships. So why should God's judgment fall on hills at all, and what do mountains and hills stand for in the language of the prophets?
The verse is one line in a list. That list has a single subject: everything man has raised up for himself. One writer reads the whole passage as aimed at the appetites and ambitions that crowd God out.
The day of the Lord will be upon everything that has fed the desire of the flesh, the desire of the eyes, and the pride of life. It will be upon everything men have delighted in, so as to shut out God and exclude Christ from their hearts. It will be upon everything that has contributed to the self-exaltation which has marked man all along, and marks him more and more now.
Another writer states the rule behind the whole list. He uses "Jehovah," the older English form of the name the ESV prints as "the LORD."
There is a day of Jehovah on all the earth... The hand of Jehovah will be against all that the world exalts. Everything or everyone that is lifted up shall be brought low: Jehovah alone shall be exalted in that day.
In prophecy a mountain is not just a landform. One writer traces the image through Scripture, starting with the empire of Babylon.
Scripture itself gives the force of the figure. Jeremiah speaks of the mighty Babylonian kingdom this way. It looked so firmly established in its might and greatness that no one could overthrow it, yet Jehovah threatens it with consuming judgment — a "burnt mountain." A mountain as a symbol represents a kingdom (Isa. 2:2; Zech. 4:7; Jer. 51:25) or a firmly established power (Ps. 46:2; Rev. 6:14; Rev. 16:20). The idea to grasp in these prophetic symbols is a strong, united, established power — and this power itself becomes the subject of God's governmental vengeance.
The verse pairs hills with mountains. Elsewhere the same pairing marks a difference of rank, not of kind.
The mountains speak of higher governmental authorities, and the little hills, lesser authorities.
So the verse reaches from the greatest empire down to the smallest local power.
The list moves from trees to hills to towers and walls. Nothing on it survives, whether man made it or God did.
Not a single relic shall be left... He will show that where man has most pride, God will do better. For all that is in the world, the desire of the flesh, the desire of the eyes, and the pride of life must pass away. Even the grandeur of nature as it now stands must fall. Still more must the imposing structures of man fall, small as they are by comparison. What are their high towers and fenced walls next to lofty hills and sublime mountains?
Some read this chapter as already fulfilled in the spread of the gospel. One writer draws a firm line between what the gospel does now and what only Christ's return will do.
Whatever the gospel may achieve for believers — and it makes them fit for God's light and heavenly glory — there can be no real deliverance for the earth and the nations until Messiah comes again in glory. Then He will execute judgment on the living and reign in peace... The judgment of man, of his pride and his idols, will come in the day of Jehovah, so that all the nations may flow to Zion in heart-homage, as the beginning of Isaiah 2 describes.
Bringing down every height is not the end of the story. It is how the blessing that opens the chapter arrives.
The rest of the chapter goes on to show how this period of blessing will be brought in. Is it by grace proclaimed? No, but by fearful judgments carried out... The result of this terrible shaking of the earth, and bringing down the pride of man, is that "Jehovah alone shall be exalted in that day."
There are two ways a proud heart can be lowered, and only one of them is gentle.
Grace bows our hearts now, and with joy we confess His name! Judgment will in that day break the proud spirit of the enemy. When His wrath is kindled but a little — the beginning of His judgment — they perish from the way.
- Height is the target. The day of the Lord is aimed at whatever is lifted up — the hand of God is against all that the world exalts.
- Mountains mean power. In prophecy a mountain stands for a kingdom or settled power. The hills beside it are the lesser authorities under it.
- Nature falls too. Even the landscape God made comes down, and man's towers and walls are small by comparison.
- Still ahead. The gospel age does not level the earth's heights. That waits for Christ's return in glory.
- One name left standing. God brings down every height so that the Lord alone stands high — and grace bows the heart now, before judgment bows it then.
and upon every high tower, and upon every fenced wall;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
and upon all the ships of Tarshish, and upon all pleasant works of art.
Isaiah lists what the day of the Lord will strike. The list runs from tall trees and mountains to walls and towers, and then reaches trade and art. Why should God's judgment fall on things that seem harmless?
The first phrase names where the ships went, and why.
A place to which ships were sent from Palestine. Some suppose it refers to a Spanish city named Tartessus. This would seem a suitable place from which to obtain silver, iron, tin and lead.
The second phrase points not at the object itself but at the appetite behind it.
Here the expression "pleasant pictures" is thought to mean "pictures of desire," as the margin reads. It refers to anything their hearts were set on.
Older translations read "pleasant pictures" where the ESV has "beautiful craft."
Isaiah names nothing ugly or crude. What God brings down is height itself, wherever it stands.
The true God would break down those who bowed down to idols. The hand of the Highest would be on all that is high and lifted up. The idols will pass away completely. Men will go into caves and holes because of the terror of Jehovah and the glory of His majesty, when He arises to shake the earth with great power. All of this will come true when Christ appears, not before.
The ships and the pictures stand for a whole way of living. One writer takes the list to cover everything people enjoy in place of God, and applies it to the great display of human skill going on around him.
The day of the Lord will be upon everything that has fed the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eye and the pride of life. It will be upon everything people have delighted in, so as to shut out God and exclude Christ from their hearts. It will be upon everything that has fed the self-exaltation that has marked man all along. Think what the pride of man's heart is doing at this very moment. It is gathering the wealth and energies of all nations into one grand display, to show the whole world what human skill and energy can achieve.
Some expect human progress to carry over into the coming age. The verse points the other way.
The day of the Lord will clearly make a clean sweep of all the things fallen man boasts in, even things pleasant and artistic. Some have imagined that it will accept and even enlarge the products of man's inventive skill, as an opening to the thousand-year age to come. Instead, it will remove them, along with the idols and idolatrous notions that produced them. Today men are humbled as they receive the grace and truth of the gospel. Then they will be brought low and their false glory will depart, as the glory of the Lord shines out.
God will outdo everything man is proudest of.
Not a single relic will be left. God will wipe the slate clean of all the busy works of man on the earth for the last six thousand years… and He will show that where man has most pride, God will do better… Even the grandeur of nature as it is must fall. Still more must the imposing structures of man fall, small as they are in comparison. What are their high towers and fenced walls next to lofty hills and grand mountains? Strong and splendid ships will be broken and pleasant pictures will fade into nothing. Jehovah alone will be exalted in that day… The day of Jehovah joins two things: God will deal with the heavens and the earth, the whole vast creation, and at the same time He will stoop to the smallest trifles of men and women… Nothing will escape His eye and hand.
Does this verse forbid pictures today? One writer, asked whether a Christian may practise photography, refused to make it a rule.
"Pleasant pictures" are named by Isaiah among the things on which judgment will fall in the day of the Lord. We must not expect to find a literal text that speaks directly to each of the artificial occupations of this highly artificial age. And if the Lord has not laid down rules for His people in these matters, it is certainly not fitting for them to lay down rules for one another. A single eye will enable us to form a sound judgment in all such things.
- Reach. Ships sailed from Palestine to Tarshish for silver, iron, tin and lead. The verse starts with the reach of human trade.
- Desire. "Pleasant pictures" reads in the margin as "pictures of desire." The target is the wanting, not the artwork.
- Height. What falls is height itself. The hand of the Highest comes down on all that is high and lifted up, and the idols pass away.
- Removal. The day of the Lord sweeps away what fallen man boasts in, even the pleasant and artistic. It does not carry human skill forward into the age to come.
- Result. Ships break, pictures fade, and the Lord alone stands exalted — when Christ appears, not before.
And the loftiness of man shall be bowed down, and the haughtiness of men shall be brought low; and Jehovah alone shall be exalted in that day
This verse says the same thing twice over, and Isaiah had already said it six verses earlier. That repetition raises two questions: when does this day come, and what exactly does God bring down?
Isaiah is not describing gradual improvement. One writer insists that nothing in history has matched this yet. No conqueror has fulfilled it, and neither has the spread of the gospel.
Lastly, he calls on them to hide in the dust because of the day of Jehovah. That day certainly has not yet fallen on the pride and idolatry of man… You only need to read the passage in a believing spirit. It will convince any fair mind that neither Nebuchadnezzar nor Titus on the one hand, nor the gospel on the other, has anything to do with the Lord's coming to carry out the all-embracing judgment of man pictured here. The true God would break down those who bowed down to idols. The hand of the Highest would be on all that is high and lifted up.
What Isaiah condemns is not what man is, but what man does with it. One writer traces the problem to its root.
It is man, whom God has exalted in Christ, in His own gracious and wonderful way. But by exalting himself, man debases himself to his own ruin… "man's day" is a day when man makes himself great with what he has robbed from God, and lifts himself up by what God's mercy has given him.
Some have imagined that the day of the Lord will crown human progress. One writer says it does the opposite.
Instead of accepting and even enlarging the products of man's inventive skill as an introduction to the millennial age, as some have imagined, it will remove them, along with the idols and the idolatrous notions that gave them birth.
One writer refuses to read this demolition as an end in itself. It clears the ground for something better.
It is the day of the Lord upon all the pride of man, to bring it low. It is the day when every refuge of lies shall be swept away and all the vanity of his thoughts shall be exposed. "The idols He shall utterly abolish." Yes, those who have been their slaves shall fling them to the moles and the bats. "And the Lord alone shall be exalted in that day." Then the way is prepared for blessing, as wide as the judgment which introduced it.
Every head goes down in that day. One writer sets out the two ways it can happen.
Grace bows our hearts now, and with joy we confess His name! Judgment will in that day break the proud spirit of the enemy.
That leaves the verse with an edge for today. Isaiah's own conclusion, five verses later, is to stop leaning on man.
This is not yet eternity. It is the age to come, when the idols will completely pass away and Jehovah alone will be exalted. The word, therefore, is "Stop regarding man in whose nostrils is breath, for of what account is he?" (v. 22). Man as such cannot hold on to his own breath, still less keep others in that day. Everything must depend on the sovereign pleasure of Him whose glory will no longer be hidden, and whose will is then shown in righteousness.
- Pride rises. Man takes the credit for what God gave him in mercy. That self-exaltation is what this verse condemns.
- The day falls. Commentators read this as a future coming of the Lord in judgment. No empire has brought it in, and neither has the spread of the gospel.
- Everything high goes low. That day sweeps away the idols and the products of man's skill. It removes what man boasts in instead of crowning it.
- God alone stands. Nothing hides His glory then, and man proves to be only breath in his nostrils.
- So bow early. Grace bows hearts now, with joy. Judgment breaks proud hearts then. The question is not whether you bow, but when.
and the idols shall utterly pass away.
Isaiah 2 opens with the nations streaming to Zion, then turns to a scene of terror where God brings down everything high in man. Verse 18 deals with man's gods in a single line. Which idols does it mean? When does it happen? Has the spread of the gospel already done it? (Some quotations below follow an older translation: "the idols he shall utterly abolish.")
This verse sits inside a wider judgment. It falls on everything the world lifts up.
There is a day of Jehovah on all the earth. The hand of Jehovah will be against all that the world exalts. Everything or everyone that is lifted up shall be brought low: Jehovah alone shall be exalted in that day. God will purify the earthly people by His judgments.
Some read this as fulfilled by the spread of Christianity. One commentator answers by pointing at the world as it is.
The true God would break down those who bowed down to idols. The hand of the Most High would fall on all that is high and lifted up. The idols shall utterly pass away. Men will go into caves and holes, away from the terror of Jehovah and from the glory of His majesty, when He rises up to shake the earth with power. All of this will come true when Christ appears, and not before. How can Christians imagine that the gospel has done this work, or ever could? Most of mankind are openly idolaters, and most of the baptized are really idolaters too.
The same writer dates it. Not now, and not in eternity, but in the age that Christ's return will open.
This is not eternity yet. It is the age to come, when the idols shall utterly pass away and Jehovah alone shall be exalted... The gospel does much for believers. It makes them fit for God's light and heavenly glory. But there can be no real deliverance for the earth and the nations until Messiah comes again in glory, judging the living and reigning in peace.
The word behind "idols" carries its own verdict on the things it names.
This controversy with idolatry is now coming to an end. The sun rises and drives away the unclean things of the night: "Jehovah is to be feared above all gods." Truly: for what are they? "all the gods of the peoples are idols" — or as the word means, "nothings" — "but Jehovah made the heavens."
The people who served the idols are the ones who throw them out. And the wreckage is not the end.
It is the day of the Lord on all the pride of man, to bring it low. On that day God sweeps away every refuge of lies and exposes the emptiness of man's thoughts. "The idols He shall utterly abolish." Yes, those who have been their slaves shall fling them to the moles and to the bats. "And the Lord alone shall be exalted in that day." Then the way is open for blessing, as wide as the judgment that brought it in.
Take away the false gods, and worship has only one object left.
Isaiah, the son of Amoz, looked forward to idols being utterly abolished (Isa. 2:18). Earthly saints will look back on that once it is done, for only one object of adoration will remain. Men will then turn to one object of worship alone. He is the True God, the Living God, the Everlasting God, the Maker of all things, the Creator of heaven and earth, and also the Redeemer and Saviour of His people.
The sweeping away is still ahead. So the warning stands, and today's idols are harder to spot than carved wood.
A short and solemn warning comes with all this truth and grace: "Little children, keep yourselves from idols." Every object outside Christ that man's heart sets up and clings to, Satan makes into an idol. They may not for the present be gold or silver, or stone or wood, but of a subtler kind. Yet the day hastens when the mass of the Jews, little as they think it possible, will return to their old sin; and so will Christendom, even where they have boasted of their Protestantism and of their unbeatable hatred of Roman idolatry.
- Nothings. The word behind "idols" means nothings. What men fear and serve has no substance at all.
- Not yet. The gospel has not done this work, and cannot. It waits for Christ's appearing in glory.
- Toppled. God sweeps away every refuge of lies. The very people who were slaves to their idols throw them out.
- Cleared. With the nothings gone, worship has one object left. He is the Living God, Creator, Redeemer and Saviour of His people.
- Meanwhile. Satan makes an idol of any object outside Christ that the heart clings to. So "keep yourselves from idols" is a warning for today, not just for that day.
And they shall go into the caves of the rocks, and into the holes of the earth, from before the terror of Jehovah, and from the glory of his majesty, when he shall arise to terrify the earth.
Isaiah pictures people crawling into caves and holes in the ground to escape God Himself. Two questions follow: when does this happen, and why does God's majesty drive people underground instead of to their knees?
Commentators tie this scene to the day of the Lord. It has not happened yet, and it does not fit a past invasion or the spread of the gospel.
Read this passage in a believing spirit, and any fair mind will be convinced. Here the Lord comes to carry out the all-embracing judgment of man. That has nothing to do with Nebuchadnezzar or Titus. It has nothing to do with the gospel either. The true God would break down those who bowed down to idols. The hand of the Highest would be on all that is high and lifted up. All this will come true when Christ appears, not before.
People mistake God's silence for His absence. That is why His day will come as such a shock.
The God whom creation has offended keeps silent for now. But the moment is coming fast when He will speak — not in grace, but in unsparing judgment. He "rises to terrify the earth" (Isa. 2:19, 21).
Before the caves, the chapter names the target: everything proud and lifted up.
The day of the Lord will be upon everything that has fed the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eye, and the pride of life. It will be upon everything men have delighted in, so as to shut out God and keep Christ out of their hearts. It will be upon everything that has fed man's self-exaltation. That self-exaltation has marked man all along. It marks him more and more now, and it marks the day we live in to a degree that is fearful to think about.
The caves are the last hiding place, after every other refuge has failed. That judgment strips people of what they trusted — and it has a purpose beyond destruction.
It is the day of the Lord upon all the pride of man, to bring it low. It is the day when every refuge of lies will be swept away, and all the emptiness of his thoughts exposed. He will utterly abolish the idols. Yes, those who were once their slaves will fling them to the moles and to the bats. The Lord alone will be exalted in that day. Then the way opens for blessing, as wide as the judgment that brought it in.
Running from God is not new. It started in the garden.
Adam and Eve disobeyed the word of God. Then they were afraid, and they tried to hide from His presence among the trees of the garden of Eden (Gen. 3:8, 10). People will repeat that useless hiding on a huge scale in the future. Kings and great men and rich men will call on the mountains and rocks to fall on them and hide them from the face of the One sitting on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb (Rev. 6:15-16).
There is another way to deal with the same God, and the difference is a single preposition.
What a contrast with Israel's own sweet singer! Despite his sins, he could say by grace, "You are my hiding place!" (Ps. 32:7). He hid in God, not from God. Before him stood One who could and would cover all his iniquities, and charge nothing to his account. Our effort to cover our sins, or to escape from His presence, is useless.
The chapter closes by telling people to stop leaning on man.
It would be useless then to call for the help of man: his day will have ended. In that day Jehovah rises to terrify the earth… "Stop regarding man, whose breath is in his nostrils; of what account is he?" (v. 22). Man as such cannot even hold on to his own breath, still less keep others alive in that day. The judgment of man, his pride and his idols, falls in the day of Jehovah, so that all the nations may then flow to Zion in heart-homage, as the beginning of Isaiah 2 describes.
- Future — this scene belongs to the day of the Lord. It waits for Christ to appear; it is not the gospel slowly improving the world.
- Pride — the shaking targets everything high and lifted up: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eye, and the pride of life.
- Refuges — every refuge of lies is swept away, and the idols people once served are flung to the moles and the bats.
- Flight — the caves repeat Eden on a world scale. Adam already proved that hiding from God fails.
- Exaltation — when pride is brought low and no help is left in man, the Lord alone stands exalted. Then blessing opens up, as wide as the judgment that brought it in.
In that day men shall cast away their idols of silver and their idols of gold, which they made [each] for himself to worship, to the moles and to the bats;
The hands that made the silver and gold images will one day throw them away. Two questions follow. When is "that day"? And why do the idols lose their grip only then?
"That day" is not this present age. One commentator sets it in the age to come, and warns against confusing it with the gospel.
How can anyone confuse this with the gospel! It is not yet eternity but the age to come, when the idols shall utterly pass away and Jehovah alone shall be exalted. So the word is, "Stop relying on man, whose breath is in his nostrils. What is he worth?" Man cannot hold on to his own breath. Still less can he keep others alive in that day... "That day" is the day of Jehovah. Whatever the gospel may do for believers, there can be no real deliverance for the earth and the nations until Messiah comes again in glory. He will come judging the living and reigning in peace.
The verse stresses ownership: each man made his own object of worship. Earlier in the chapter the prophet lists what else filled the land.
"Their land is full of silver and gold, and there is no end to their treasures. Their land is full of horses, and there is no end to their chariots. Their land is full of idols; they worship the work of their own hands, what their own fingers have made." Their sin was completely unpardonable. Judah had such glorious prospects from God's sure word, yet they chased heathen superstitions, not only Gentile wealth and power, but sadly their idols too.
The verse names two creatures. A Bible dictionary explains what the bat meant in Israel.
The bat was forbidden to be eaten under the law (Leviticus 11:19; Deuteronomy 14:18). Several species are found in Palestine: they live in the tombs and caves, and are at home in darkness. Where there are many of them the smell is very offensive. Their home is a fitting picture of darkness and foulness. It is the place where men will throw their idols of gold and silver, when Jehovah rises up to deal with the earth.
One writer asks how the promised blessing arrives. The answer is not gentle.
The rest of the chapter shows how this period of blessing will come in. Is it by grace preached? No, it is by fearful judgments carried out. "The day of Jehovah" comes and destroys the pride of man. It makes him throw his idols to the moles and to the bats, and run "into the clefts of the rocks, and into the tops of the rugged cliffs, for fear of Jehovah, and for the glory of His majesty."
If Israel gave up idols long ago, what is left to throw away? One writer answers that the sin was held down, not killed.
The Jews have long and completely laid aside idolatry... The iniquity was only suppressed and shifted for the time. It is only held down, not destroyed or rooted out... Idolatry will surely come back. It will come back not only among the Christianised Gentiles, but among the Jews, little as they may expect it. It is a settled truth of Scripture that the mere absence of evil is never deliverance from its power. An empty, swept, or even decorated condition in itself means no final escape.
The chapter does not end in ruin. One writer traces what this day makes room for.
It is the day when every refuge of lies shall be swept away, and all the emptiness of his thoughts shall be exposed. "The idols He shall utterly abolish." Yes, those who have been their slaves shall fling them to the moles and to the bats. "And the Lord alone shall be exalted in that day." Then the way is prepared for blessing, as wide as the judgment that has brought it in.
- Made — the idols are silver and gold, shaped by the worshipper's own fingers. Judah's wealth became the raw material for its rivals to God.
- Suppressed — idolatry pushed out of sight is not idolatry destroyed. The absence of an evil is never freedom from its power, and it will come back.
- Terrified — grace preached does not break the hold of these images. The day of the Lord does, when men run to the rocks in fear of the Lord and before the glory of His majesty.
- Discarded — where the idols end up shows what they are worth: dark, foul caves with the moles and the bats. The owners themselves do the throwing.
- Exalted — when the idols go, the Lord alone stands exalted. The judgment that clears them away opens the way for blessing just as wide.
to go into the clefts of the rocks, and into the fissures of the cliffs, from before the terror of Jehovah, and from the glory of his majesty, when he shall arise to terrify the earth.
For the second time in three verses, Isaiah shows people running into cracks in the rocks as the LORD rises. The repeat presses three questions: when does this happen, what does God destroy, and where can anyone hide?
Commentators say this scene has not happened yet. Kelly rules out two familiar answers from the past, and rules out the gospel too.
You need only read this passage in a believing spirit to convince any fair mind of one thing. Neither Nebuchadnezzar or Titus on the one hand, nor the gospel on the other, has anything to do with the Lord's coming to carry out the all-embracing judgment of man pictured here… The idols will completely pass away, and men will go into caves and holes from before the terror of the LORD and from the glory of His majesty, when He rises to shake the earth mightily. All of it will come true when Christ appears, not before.
The chapter has promised a time of blessing. How does that blessing arrive?
The rest of the chapter shows how this time of blessing comes in. Is it by grace proclaimed? No, by fearful judgments carried out. "The day of the LORD" comes, destroying the pride of man… This terrible shaking of the earth brings the pride of man down. The result is that "the LORD alone will be exalted in that day."
One writer lists what this day falls upon. It is everything people have used to crowd God out.
The day of the Lord will be upon everything that has served the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eye, and the pride of life. It will be upon everything men have delighted in, so as to shut out God and exclude Christ from their hearts. It will be upon everything that has fed the self-exaltation that has marked man all along, and marks him more and more now.
The rush to the rocks is also the moment people throw their idols away. One writer sees every false refuge collapse, and a door opening to blessing.
It is the day when God sweeps away every refuge of lies and exposes the emptiness of man's thoughts… The people who were slaves to their idols will fling them to the moles and to the bats… Then the way is open for blessing, as wide as the judgment that brought it in.
Some readers object that idol worship died out long ago. Kelly answers that evil pushed out of sight has not gone away:
Idolatry is only held down, not destroyed or uprooted. God will judge it in that day… Idolatry will certainly reappear… It is an unchanging truth of Scripture that the mere absence of evil is never a deliverance from its power.
Running for cover is not new. One writer traces it back to the garden and forward to a day when kings and rich men do the same.
Adam and Eve disobeyed the word of God. They were afraid, so they tried to hide from His presence among the trees of the garden of Eden (Gen. 3:8, 10). People will try the same useless hiding on a huge scale in the future. Kings and great men and rich men will call on the mountains and rocks to fall on them and hide them from the face of the One sitting on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb (Rev. 6:15-16).
If the rocks are no shelter, where should a person go? One writer answers plainly.
There is wrath coming upon the world, but God has made a hiding-place for you. Isaiah spoke of it: "a man will be like a hiding place from the wind." If you want shelter from the wrath to come, you will find it in Christ. You will find Him an ark of refuge. Noah was warned by God about things not yet seen, and in fear he built an ark to save his household. But a judgment is coming that no wooden ark could shelter you from. Where will you find a hiding place in that day? God has prepared a shelter from that storm. Where is it? It is Christ at the right hand of God.
- Pride is the target of the day — not one nation's sin, but man's self-exaltation and everything built to shut God out.
- Idols go next, flung to the moles and the bats. Idolatry pushed out of sight is only held down, and it comes back to face judgment.
- Rocks become the refuge people run to. Kings and rich men panic like everyone else — the reflex Adam showed among the trees, now worldwide.
- Timing is still ahead. No past disaster did this, and preaching will not do it. It waits for Christ's appearing.
- Shelter is the one thing the cliffs cannot give. God has made a hiding place from the coming wrath, and it is Christ.
Cease ye from man, whose breath is in his nostrils; for what account is to be made of him?
Isaiah 2 describes a day when God humbles everything proud and the Lord alone is exalted. The chapter then closes with one short command about where people place their confidence. Two questions press: which "man" is meant, and what does it look like to stop counting on him?
This is not general advice about people. It points to a coming day, and to what a man is worth on it.
It is not yet eternity but the age to come when the idols shall utterly pass away and Jehovah alone shall be exalted. The word, therefore, is "Cease from man, whose breath is in his nostrils, for what is he worth?" (v. 22). Man as such is not able to keep his own life-breath, still less to keep others in that day. Everything must depend on the sovereign pleasure of Him whose glory will no longer be hidden. His will is then to be displayed in righteousness.
The verse has puzzled translators. Some have read it as a warning against leaning on Christ, or even on God. Kelly rejects both readings. He quotes an older translation, which reads "Cease from man" where the ESV has "Stop regarding man."
The sense seems simple to me, though many translators and commentators miss it. It is not Christ, nor man in Christ, that is meant, but man in nature, man self-exalting and yet idol-loving. "Cease from man, whose breath is in his nostrils (easily snuffed out, therefore, as far as life here is concerned): for what is he worth?" The man whose pride and idolatry will meet such a striking doom in the day of the Lord can never be a support to rest on. On the other hand, 2 Chronicles 35:21 has a different subject, so the English translators had to change the wording there. The sense there is not at all "cease from leaning on God," but, as the English version rightly has it, "hold back from meddling with God." It is a question of context, not of Hebrew.
If the warning only covered obviously wicked people, it would be easy to keep. Kelly applies it instead to Moses at the rock, where the meekest of men lost his temper with the people.
The people were extremely ungrateful and in revolt. Provoked by this, Moses "spoke rashly with his lips." "Hear now, you rebels; shall we bring water for you out of this rock?" Who asked this of him? Moses was overcome by evil instead of overcoming evil with good. The man who had so long lived as the meekest of men failed completely in that very respect at the last… "Cease from man whose breath is in his nostrils; for what is he worth?"
The verse shuts one source of confidence so that another can open. Pollock traces that turn back to Adam and Christ.
Adam, as God made him, was a picture of Christ; as he made himself in his fall, he becomes a contrast to Christ… Never was a finer man placed in finer circumstances than Adam — yet he fell. As fallen, he became the head of a race of men like himself. What can come from such a source? If the fountain is polluted we shall not expect clean water to flow from it. Let us once and for all "cease from man whose breath is in his nostrils," and turn to Him in whom alone perfection beyond compare dwells.
This mistake is common and easy to make. It looks like resting our weight on someone who cannot hold it.
How instructive all this is! What a sad mistake it is to lean on human strength! And yet how prone we all are to do so in one way or another! We lean on our fellow-mortal instead of leaning on the living God, and in the end we find we have been trusting a broken reed. "Confidence in an unfaithful man in time of trouble is like a broken tooth, or a foot out of joint."
- Setting: The command closes a chapter about the day of the Lord. On that day God humbles everything lifted up, and He alone is exalted.
- Reason: Breath in the nostrils is easily snuffed out. A man who cannot keep his own life cannot hold up yours.
- Target: The warning aims at man in his natural state — self-exalting and idol-loving. It does not aim at Christ, or at man in Christ.
- Reach: It covers the best of men too. Even Moses, the meekest, failed at the rock.
- Result: Ceasing from man is not despair but redirection. Turn to the One in whom perfection beyond compare dwells.
For behold, the Lord, Jehovah of hosts, will take away from Jerusalem and from Judah stay and staff, the whole stay of bread, and the whole stay of water,
Isaiah 2 ends with human pride brought low. Chapter 3 turns that same judgment on God's own people, and the first supports to go are bread and water — why would God strip away what He Himself gave?
This verse sits inside a larger block, chapters 2 to 4. One writer maps that block like this:
Isaiah 2–4. Here the kingdom appears at the beginning under the picture of "a mountain," and shows some of its glories at the end. But corruption and judgment fill the middle, between that opening and closing with glory. Yet we see the remnant for a moment (Isaiah 3:10). Isaiah 3:1-9 looks ahead to the blind folly that in God's way usually comes before destruction.
So why does God send a prophet at this point at all?
There is an important principle to notice: every prophecy assumes the ruin of the state of things in which the prophecy is given. When everything goes according to the mind of God, there is no need of warning. We see it here in a striking way. Prophecy reveals all the hopes that belong to the faithful when the existing order breaks down. It announces the failures, and the judgments on what man tries to do because of the evil.
The verse names God twice over, and the first title carries the sense of a master whose claim is owned:
Adon (lord) first occurs in Genesis 18:12, where Sarah speaks of Abraham as "her lord"... This is the common use: the open respect given to the one addressed. The superior may be a husband addressed by his wife, a master addressed by a servant, or a king addressed by a subject.
Isaiah joins that title to the name Jehovah, and this verse is one of the places:
In Isaiah 1:24, "Thus says the Lord, Jehovah of hosts"; so in Isaiah 3:1; so in Isaiah 10:33.
The judgment reaches everyone. But it falls hardest on the people who bear God's name, and it does not stop at their public life:
The humbling of human pride must be universal. Yet this chapter shows that the blow will fall hardest on Jerusalem and Judah. It falls not only on their public political life, but in searching detail on the daughters of Zion in all their petty pride and empty show. What surer sign of decay and coming collapse could there be than the absence of all power in those who hold authority, when the men who should be the props of the state are children — not literally, but in mind and purpose?... There is no ruin without sin; and here it was frightful and shameless.
after
Nothing is too small for that examination:
Divine judgment notices every detail of iniquity, oppression, and even vanity. All must be brought low.
God had already written this threat into the law, as one stage in His discipline of a people who would not listen:
"And if you will not be disciplined by me through these, but walk contrary to me, then I also will walk contrary to you. I will strike you Myself, sevenfold for your sins... When I break the staff of your bread, ten women shall bake your bread in one oven. They shall hand the bread back to you by weight, and you shall eat, and not be satisfied."
Chapter 2 had already given the word. Chapter 3 enforces it by removing every human support:
The word, therefore, is "Stop regarding man in whose nostrils is breath, for of what account is he?" (v. 22). Man as such is not able to hold on to his own breath, still less to keep others alive in that day. Everything must plainly hang on the sovereign pleasure of Him who will hide His glory no longer.
One writer brings that warning home to us:
How full of warning all this is! What a sad mistake it is to lean on an arm of flesh! And yet how ready we all are to do so in one way or another! We lean on another human being instead of leaning on the living God. In the end we find we have been trusting a broken reed.
The removal is not the last word in this section of Isaiah:
God pushes the judgment and the ruin to the very limit. But Christ the Branch of beauty and glory will appear at that time for the remnant... The glory will shine out over the whole extent of the holy city.
- Props — God starts by removing what Jerusalem and Judah leaned on: bread and water first of all.
- Warning — God sends prophecy only when things are already in ruin. Where all goes according to His mind, no warning is needed.
- Covenant — breaking "the staff of bread" was named in the law as a step in God's discipline, not an accident of history.
- Reach — the judgment searches public life and private vanity alike. Nothing escapes it.
- Aim — strip away every human support, and only God is left to lean on. After the stripping comes the Branch of beauty and glory, for the remnant.
the mighty man and the man of war, the judge and the prophet, and the diviner and the elder,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
the captain of fifty, and the honourable man, and the counsellor, and the clever among artificers, and the one versed in enchantments.
Isaiah lists the men a nation leans on: its officers, its men of rank, its advisers and its specialists. God says He is taking every one of them away. So what happens to a people when the skills and standing that held it together are gone? And why would God remove them?
The chapter turns from the future day of the Lord back to the people of Isaiah's own time. Their coming losses are God's discipline.
In Isaiah 2 the prophet spoke of the day of the Lord and its effects. In Isaiah 3 he turns again to the state of the people in his own day. He also makes plain how God was disciplining them, and would go on doing so. The famine, the confusion and the oppression, with all the misery they brought, would leave Jerusalem in ruins. This might not fall on them at once, but in the end it would. God would still favour the righteous, as verse 10 shows. The ancients and princes of the people were the leaders in the evil of that day.
The last man in the list is not a public speaker. The older King James Version called him an "eloquent orator." Later translators corrected that, because the Hebrew word points to something quite different.
lachash. In Isaiah 3:3 the King James Version joins this word with "eloquent," but it means "a whisper" or "incantation." A better translation is "one versed in enchantments." The Revised Version has "skilful enchanter."
So one of the supports Judah counted on practised what God had banned in Israel.
"For all that do these things are an abomination to Jehovah: and because of these abominations Jehovah your God drives them out from before you. You shall be perfect with Jehovah your God."
"The counselor" heads the second half of the verse. Scripture shows God doing to such men what Isaiah warns of here. He need not remove the man; He can empty the office.
"He leads counsellors away plundered, and makes fools of the judges." That is, He strips counsellors of the value of their advice. So man's wisdom comes to nothing, and the judges turn foolish. Man's authority becomes as useless as his wisdom. Men everyone thought dependable lose their speech and their power to help others. Even elders known for their experience find their good judgment taken away.
Isaiah does not leave the space empty. The captains, the men of rank and the advisers are gone. But someone still sits in the seat of authority, and that is the sharpest part of the judgment.
What surer sign of decay, and of a state about to fall apart, than the total lack of power in the men who hold authority! Those who should be the props of the state are children — not literally, but in mind and purpose. Respect for high office must then give way to contempt on every side. Oppression and shameless wrongdoing parade unchecked, and anarchy is the result… There is no ruin without sin, and here the sin was dreadful and shameless.
God's eye does not stop at the great offices of state.
Divine judgment notices every detail of iniquity, oppression, and even vanity. All must be brought low.
And this chapter is not only about Isaiah's own day.
This chapter describes the corrupt conditions among the professing people of God in Isaiah's day. A similar corruption and worldliness prevailing in our age demands divine judgment.
- Props. Officers, men of rank, advisers and skilled experts held Judah up. God says He is pulling every one of them away.
- Source. The losses were not accident or politics. God was disciplining His people, and their leading men were the leaders in the evil.
- Skill. God can leave a counsellor in office and still take away the worth of his advice. Then human wisdom and human authority are both useless.
- Substitute. When the props are gone, authority falls to men who are children in mind and purpose. Respect turns to contempt, oppression goes unchecked, and anarchy follows.
- Scope. God's judgment misses no detail, from cruelty down to vanity. The same corruption in any age calls for the same answer.
And I will appoint youths as their princes, and children shall rule over them.
God's first answer to a proud nation is not an invading army but a leadership vacuum. He takes away every steady leader and hands power to boys — which raises two questions: who are these boys, and why is weak rule a punishment?
Childish rulers come at the end of a list. God names every support a society leans on and says He is taking them all. (Kelly quotes verses 1-4 in an older translation.)
However complete the fall of human pride must be, this chapter shows that the blow will fall hardest on Jerusalem and Judah. […] "For behold, the Lord, Jehovah of hosts, takes away from Jerusalem and from Judah the stay and the staff, the whole supply of bread, and the whole supply of water; the mighty man, and the man of war; the judge, and the prophet, and the diviner, and the elder; the captain of fifty, and the honourable man, and the counsellor, and the skilled craftsman, and the expert enchanter. And I will give youths to be their princes, and children shall rule over them."
These rulers need not be children in years. Kelly sees a childish mind in the seat of power, and follows what that rule produces.
What surer sign of decay and coming collapse than the loss of all power among those who hold authority! Those who should be the props of the state are children — not in years, but in mind and purpose. Respect for high office must then give way to open contempt. Oppression and shameless wrongdoing flaunt themselves unchecked, and anarchy is the result.
Weak government here is a verdict on a people. Fereday sets the verse beside Solomon's warning, and weighs a child in years against a childish mind. (The older wording he quotes, "with childishness shall they rule over them," is the ESV's "infants shall rule over them.")
Solomon says in Ecclesiastes, a book with much sound wisdom about "things under the sun": "Woe to you, O land, when your king is a child" (Ecc. 10:16). In earlier days than those of Josiah, Jehovah said about Israel: "I will give children to be their princes, and with childishness shall they rule over them" (Isa. 3:4). This was judgment on a people who did not value His word and had no desire to walk in His ways. It is hard to say which is worse for a nation, a child in years, or a man with a childish mind.
The new rulers are not the first failure in this chapter. The men God removes had set the direction of the evil, and He still keeps a difference for the righteous.
Isaiah 2 spoke of the day of the Lord and its effects. In Isaiah 3 Isaiah deals again with the state of the people. He also makes plain how God was chastising them, and would go on doing so. The famine, confusion and oppression, with the miseries that go with them, would leave Jerusalem in ruins. They might not come at once, but they would come in the end, though God would favour the righteous, as verse 10 shows. The elders and princes of the people were the leaders in the evil of that day.
A child on the throne need not mean God has given up. Fereday points to Josiah, who began to reign at eight, and to the mercy that came with him.
It is startling to read in 2 Chronicles 34:1: "Josiah was eight years old when he began to reign." […] What could a child of eight do with a turbulent people far advanced in wickedness, and dangerously near to overwhelming judgment? What follows will show that Jehovah had mercy on the child, and also on the nation.
The judgment on Jerusalem is not the end of the story. Darby looks past the blow to what God does after it.
They may stop trusting in man, for their God will judge and strike His own people on the earth, the place of His rest (Isa. 3, 4). But in that day the Branch of Jehovah shall be glorious, and the earth shall be blessed. He who strikes binds up the wounds by bringing in the Messiah, and blessing the earth through Him.
- Cause — The childish rulers are a sentence, not bad luck: judgment on a people who did not value God's word or want His ways.
- Removal — God first takes away the stay and the staff: bread, water, soldier, judge, prophet, elder, counsellor. Only then does He hand power to boys.
- Substitute — The rulers He gives are children in mind and purpose. Where authority has no weight, contempt, oppression and anarchy follow.
- Complicity — The elders and princes had already led the way in evil. God removes them, and still favours the righteous.
- Cure — The One who strikes also binds up. He had mercy on the boy king Josiah, and He will bring in the Messiah, when the Branch of Jehovah is glorious and the earth is blessed.
And the people shall be oppressed one by the other, and each by his neighbour; the child will be insolent against the elder, and the base against the honourable.
This verse shows a society falling apart from the inside. People prey on each other. The young defy the old, and those of no account sneer at the respected. Commentators do not read this as random social decay. They read it as God's judgment on a people who had turned away from Him. What brings a nation to this point, and what comes after it?
Isaiah is not aiming at foreign nations here. Writers trace the ruin to God's own people copying the ways of the nations around them:
Why has He forsaken His people? Because they have learned the ways of the nations. The day of the LORD will fall on all the glory of man, and on all his idols. Let them stop trusting in man, for God will judge and strike His own people on the earth, the place of His rest.
Behind this verse stands leadership with no strength. Take the power out of authority, and contempt fills the gap:
What surer sign of decay and coming collapse can there be than a total lack of power among those in authority? Those who should hold up the state are children — not literally, but in mind and purpose! Respect for high office must then give way to contempt from everyone. Oppression and shameless wrongdoing parade unchecked, and anarchy is the result.
The crowd does not carry the blame alone. The leaders set the pace, and the disaster was slow to arrive but certain:
The famine, the confusion, the oppression and all the misery that goes with them would leave Jerusalem in ruins. They might not come on the people at once, but in the end they would come. Even so, God would favour the righteous, as verse 10 shows. The elders and princes of the people were the leaders in the evil of that day.
Bad leadership here is a punishment handed to a people. The childishness in view is a matter of mind, not age:
This was judgment on a people who did not value His word and had no desire to walk in His ways. It is hard to say which is worse for a nation: a child in years, or a man with a childish mind... God shows what He thinks kingship should be in His description of David: "With upright heart he shepherded them and guided them with his skillful hand." A land with such a ruler is blessed indeed. But David was far from perfect, and no one will see God's ideal king until our Lord Jesus returns from heaven.
This is not sealed off in the past. One writer sees the same self-will pushing authority aside in our own day:
Man's self-will, which puts up with no restraint, is casting off authority more and more... The people are seeking to rule in place of the King and his representatives. Men are seeking to rule in place of masters, and children in place of parents. The result is that the whole world system is losing its moral bearings and falling fast into ruin and chaos.
This verse sits inside a section that opens and closes with the kingdom in splendour. The collapse here is the middle of the story, not the end of it:
Here the kingdom, pictured as "a mountain," is looked forward to at the beginning, and shown in some of its glories at the end. But corruption and judgment are the main material of this prophecy, in between that opening and closing glory. The faithful remnant, though, comes into view for a moment. Blind self-confidence, which in God's ways usually comes before destruction, is pictured in Isaiah 3:1-9.
Judgment is not the last word here. Darby follows the story past the blow:
In that day the Branch of the LORD will be glorious, and the earth will be blessed. The One who strikes binds up the wounds, by bringing in the Messiah and through Him blessing the earth.
- Cause. The ruin starts with God's people learning the ways of the nations. His hand then falls on the glory of man and on his idols.
- Sentence. Rulers with childish minds are not bad luck. They are judgment on a people who did not value God's word or want to walk in His ways.
- Collapse. Strip authority of power, and respect turns to contempt. Oppression goes unchecked, and anarchy follows — the scene this verse describes.
- Reach. The same self-will is casting off authority today. People push aside rulers, and children push aside parents.
- Result. Corruption and judgment fill the middle of this prophecy, but glory opens and closes it. The One who strikes also binds up the wound. The perfect King is still to come.
When a man shall take hold of his brother, in his father's house, [and shall say] Thou hast clothing; be our chief, and let this ruin be under thy hand;
God is taking away every support Judah leaned on: food, water, soldiers, judges, elders, counsellors. The nation is left so bare that a man grabs his own brother inside the family home and tries to make him ruler. The one qualification is that his brother owns a cloak. How did a favoured people sink this low?
This chapter follows a wider warning about human pride. One writer traces how the blow then narrows: from the world at large to this one nation, and from public life down to private vanity.
Human pride must be brought low everywhere. Yet this chapter shows that the blow falls most crushingly on Jerusalem and Judah. It falls not only on their public political life. It reaches, in close detail, the daughters of Zion in all their proud, trivial show.
This judgment does not stop with the nation's leaders.
Divine judgment notices every detail of wrongdoing, oppression, and even vanity. All must be brought low.
Verse 6 follows on from verses 4 and 5. There God gives Judah boys for princes, and the young sneer at the old. When the men in office carry no weight, nobody respects the office either.
What surer sign of decay and coming collapse could there be than this? Those who hold authority have no power at all. The men who should be the pillars of the state are children — not in age, but in mind and purpose. Respect for high office must then give way to contempt on every side. Oppression and shameless wrongdoing flaunt themselves unchecked, and the result is anarchy.
That is the setting of the brother's plea. Nobody is fighting for power now. They push it onto anyone who will take it, and the search does not even leave the family home. What the man offers his brother is not a kingdom but a heap of ruins.
That heap of ruins did not appear overnight. The men who held the top places built it, and God had been dealing with the nation long before the collapse showed.
Having spoken of the day of the Lord and its effects in Isaiah 2, Isaiah deals again with the existing state of the people in Isaiah 3. He also makes plain how God was chastising them, and would go on doing so. The famine, confusion and oppression, with all the misery they brought, would leave Jerusalem in ruins. They might not come on the people at once, but they would come in the end. Yet God would favour the righteous, as verse 10 shows. The elders and princes of the people were the leaders in the evil of that day.
Verses 1-9 read like a people sleepwalking into disaster.
Corruption and judgment are the main material of this prophecy, set between an opening and a closing that speak of glory. But the remnant appears for a moment (Isa. 3:10). Isaiah 3:1-9 looks at the blind folly which, in God's way, usually comes before destruction. Scripture gives this judgment of God its usual name, "the day of the Lord."
Chapter 3 is not the end of the story. Chapter 4 brings in the Branch. But the ruined scene still stands as a warning. One writer presses it on the Christian world, which has received more light than Judah ever had.
So Isaiah 4 shows the Branch. He alone produces such excellent fruit in Israel, once His judgment has purged the guilty. The part of Isaiah 2 in between, and the whole of Isaiah 3, uncovers the evil and ruin of Zion, publicly and privately. Judgment begins at God's house. What will it be for Christendom, which is still more favoured?
- Props pulled. God Himself removes what a nation leans on: food, defence, judges, elders. No part of life is too small for Him to touch. Even vanity comes down.
- Props replaced. Weak men fill the empty places — rulers who are children in mind and purpose. Respect turns to contempt, and it ends in anarchy.
- Props begged for. Verse 6 is that collapse in one picture. A man grabs a relative because he owns a cloak, and offers him a heap of ruins to govern.
- Props built the ruin. The elders and princes led the way in the evil. The famine, confusion and oppression that followed were God's chastening — delayed, but certain.
- Props of God's own. After His judgment purges the guilty, the Branch produces fruit no human ruler could. And the same warning stands over every people more favoured than Judah, since judgment begins at God's house.
he will lift up [his hand] in that day, saying, I cannot be a healer, and in my house there is neither bread nor clothing; ye shall not make me a chief of the people.
Judah's collapse has reached the point where the honour of ruling has become a burden nobody wants. The man asked to take charge says he has nothing to give, which raises two questions: how does a nation get to this point, and who can heal it?
Commentators read this refusal as the last stage of a long decay. William Kelly sees the emptiness of the men left in office as the surest sign that a state is about to fall apart:
Is there any surer sign of decay and coming collapse than this? Those who hold the place of authority have no power at all. Those who should be the props of the state are children — not in age, but in mind and purpose. Respect for high office must then give way to contempt from everyone. Oppression and shameless wrongdoing parade themselves unchecked, and anarchy is the result. … There is no ruin without sin; and here it was frightful and shameless.
The man's plea of an empty house fits the famine the chapter describes. F. B. Hole reads that famine as God's discipline on the nation:
Isaiah has spoken of the day of the Lord and its effects in Isaiah 2. In Isaiah 3 he deals again with the state the people were in. He also makes plain how God was chastising them, and would go on doing so. The famine, confusion and oppression, with the miseries they bring, would leave Jerusalem in ruins. This might not come on the people at once, but it would come in the end. Even so, God would favour the righteous, as verse 10 shows. The elders and princes of the people were the leaders in the evil of that day.
The scramble to find any ruler — and the flat refusal that answers it — belongs to a section that writers see as a portrait of a people who cannot read their own situation. J. G. Bellett places these verses precisely:
The blindness which commonly, in God's way, comes before destruction is anticipated in Isaiah 3:1-9.
Kelly points to the same moral root at the end of his comment on the chapter: "There is no ruin without sin; and here it was frightful and shameless."
The chapter is about Jerusalem, not about the church. Yet Kelly applies it to Christendom — the whole Christian world — which God has favoured even more:
The middle part of Isaiah 2 and all of Isaiah 3 uncovers the evil and ruin of Zion, publicly and privately. Judgment begins at God's house. What will it be for Christendom, which is still more favoured?
The shortage of anyone fit to rule is not just Judah's problem. One writer traces it to the cross:
Still the cry because of oppression goes up into the ear of God, and He is quiet, and men think He does not notice. And because they think so, they are rising up today to take things into their own hands, and settle them in their own fashion. Yet they can never be settled that way: where are the righteous who are fit to rule? … And if they could find one perfectly righteous, would they gladly submit to him? What does the Cross say about that? The One they need has come and been rejected. … There is One who can be safely trusted — only One. He had power in His hand on earth once, and He used it, but never for Himself.
This man refuses to be a healer. One writer points instead to the only One who can heal, and warns against human schemes to repair the damage:
In the days of the prophet Malachi, the godly had the coming of Christ before them. They knew there would be no recovery for Israel until the Sun of righteousness rose with healing in His wings. In the same way, it is our privilege to have the coming of the Lord before us. We own that no power on earth can patch up the fragments of the scattered church, or heal the sorrows of the world. He alone can gather His people together, heal the broken hearts, bind up our wounds and still the storms of life.
- Cause. "There is no ruin without sin." The empty house and the crown nobody wants grew out of guilt that was open and shameless.
- Collapse. Power drains out of the men who still hold office. Contempt, unchecked oppression and anarchy follow.
- Discipline. The famine behind the empty house is God's chastening — delayed, perhaps, but certain, and even in it He favours the righteous.
- Refusal. The man with no bread and no cloak shows the shortage runs deeper than food. There is no one fit to rule, and people rejected the One they truly needed.
- Healing. No power on earth can patch up the pieces. The Lord alone gathers, heals and binds up. And judgment begins at God's own house — a warning to those He has favoured most.
For Jerusalem stumbleth and Judah falleth, because their tongue and their doings are against Jehovah, to provoke the eyes of his glory.
The chapter has just described a nation falling apart. Its leaders have no power, and children rule. This verse gives the reason. It points to what the people said and did before God.
One writer looks at the signs of decay and names the cause behind the collapse.
The men who should hold up the state are children — not in age, but in mind and purpose. Those in authority have no power at all. What clearer sign of decay and coming collapse could there be? Respect for high office must then give way to contempt everywhere. Oppression and shameless wrongdoing go unchecked, and anarchy follows… There is no ruin without sin; and here it was appalling and shameless.
Isaiah names two things: their speech and their deeds. One writer traces the offence to how Jerusalem behaved and how she talked.
This provocation comes from the proud, insolent ways and speeches of Jerusalem. See verse 8. A similar word appears in 1 Corinthians 10:22: "Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy?" There the provocation comes from the saints, the worshippers of God, being present in idol-temples.
Where the ESV reads "defying his glorious presence," the older wording these writers quote is "to provoke the eyes of his glory." The same writer saw that provocation in a huge public show of human skill and achievement.
I think that those who go to this International Exhibition are, in a way, provoking the Lord to jealousy, and provoking the eyes of His glory. They are in something like a temple of idol-worship. By their high admiration of man and his skill and his successes, they give the creature what is due to the Creator.
The verse speaks of Jerusalem's fall as if it were done. One commentator explains why the blow had not yet landed.
In Isaiah 2 the prophet spoke of the day of the Lord and its effects. In Isaiah 3 he deals again with the state of the people at that time. He also makes plain how God was chastising them, and would continue to do so. The famine, confusion and oppression, with the miseries that go with them, would ruin Jerusalem. They might not come on the people at once, but they would come in the end.
One writer finds the same corruption among God's people in his own time.
This chapter describes the corrupt conditions among the people who claimed to belong to God in Isaiah's day. A similar corruption and worldliness are widespread in our own age, and they call for God's judgment.
Long afterwards a small group came back to the land from exile. They knew why their fathers had been swept away. This verse stayed in their memory, and it did not crush them.
Their memories might well bring back painful thoughts of past dark days. God had warned their guilty fathers again and again. Because of their shameless wickedness, Jehovah's eye would not spare them, and He would not pity them; their tongue and their doings had been against the Lord, "to provoke the eyes of His glory" (Isa. 3:8). But fear like a slave's did not suit these living representatives of the same nation. Their safe return to the land had made them examples of mercy glorying against judgment.
- Cause. A nation falls apart for one reason at root: "There is no ruin without sin." The verse gives the "because" for everything wrong in the chapter.
- Speech. God weighs speech alongside conduct. Jerusalem's words and her deeds both stood against Him.
- Eyes. The offence happens in full view of God's glory. One writer finds it wherever admiration of human skill gives the creature what belongs to the Creator.
- Delay. God announced the sentence long before it landed. What may not come at once still comes in the end.
- Mercy. The generation that later remembered this verse did not sink into fear. They came back as living proof of mercy glorying against judgment.
The look of their face doth witness against them, and they declare their sin as Sodom they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have brought evil upon themselves.
Judah's problem in chapter 3 was not only sin, but sin that no longer hid itself — faces now showed what hearts were doing. Two questions follow: why does Isaiah name this people after Sodom, and how does their evil fall back on them?
Judah's leaders had already failed. One writer traces what follows, and refuses to treat the ruin as bad luck:
Respect for high office must then give way to contempt from everyone. Oppression and shameless wrongdoing flaunt themselves without check, and the result is anarchy… There is no ruin without sin; and here it was frightful and shameless.
One writer maps chapters 2 to 4 and names the mood running through the verses that end here:
Corruption and judgment are the main material of this prophecy, which opens and closes with glory. But the remnant appears for a moment (Isa. 3:10). Blind folly, which in God's ways usually comes before destruction, is pictured in advance in Isa. 3:1-9.
Sodom was the city God destroyed for its wickedness. One writer weighs what Judah's religion was worth once the nation had reached that condition:
They had plenty of religious zeal. They also looked for a remedy for the obvious troubles of their day, but their remedies were worse than useless. God-given privileges only made their moral state more alarming and intolerable. Without Jehovah's mercy they stood near the doom of Sodom. Morally they were already Sodom. So their sacrifices, feasts, and assemblies were all the more hateful to Him. He felt that their feet defiled His courts, and He refused to hear their many prayers. There was no real repentance, no trembling at His word, but a religious veil over utter and shameless sin.
The prophet Ezekiel was later sent to the same nation, described in the same terms. One writer draws out what such a face shows:
They are children as "impudent of face" as they are "hard of heart." Their heart spoke in their faces, so that they could hide nothing any longer. God sends to them knowing this completely. Against their blasphemous words He sets the speech of the Unchangeable One whom they have refused.
The verse ends by saying they brought the evil on themselves. One writer applies the same rule to every sinner:
God is not arbitrary in the punishment of the wicked… How wickedly empty is the talk about God being "too merciful to send men to hell." Men show no mercy to themselves. They have only themselves to blame for their doom. All this is sharper still, because infinite love has provided a free remedy, which so many reject.
The same writer traces how one spared sin destroyed King Saul:
It was an Amalekite who killed Saul, which shows what we have already seen: sin is self-destruction. One of the very nation he had failed to destroy completely now rises up to make an end of him… A spared Amalekite is some desire of the flesh indulged and allowed. It may seem harmless in itself, but a deliberate sparing of evil opens the way for this closing act of shame.
Open, unhidden sin also marks the last days. One writer describes evil that no longer waits for the cover of night:
The unbridled lust, lawlessness, boldness, self-will and corruption of the last days will be worse than any outbreak of evil in the past. It is found among people who claim the Christian name, and it goes on in the full light of the truth. Out of sheer shame, men usually wait for the darkness of night to do their evil deeds. These men, without shame, "revel in the daytime." As one has said, "They have learned to face the light and defy it."
- Cause. The nation's collapse had a reason: "there is no ruin without sin." Here the sin was open and shameless.
- Blindness. Blind folly runs ahead of destruction. Isaiah still frames the whole section with glory.
- Name. Judah kept its religion and its privileges, but morally it "was already Sodom." That made its sacrifices and prayers more offensive to God, not less.
- Exposure. The heart had risen into the face. Nothing could be hidden, and God spoke to them knowing it.
- Recoil. The woe falls on them, because sin is self-destruction. They earned their doom, and they turned down a free remedy.
Say ye of the righteous that it shall be well [with him], for they shall eat the fruit of their doings.
Isaiah 3 describes a nation falling apart: leaders removed, order breaking down, Jerusalem heading for ruin. In the middle of that dark news comes one line about the righteous, and it asks whether God still sees them when a whole nation is judged.
The verse sits between open, shameless sin and rulers crushing the poor. One commentator points out that a day of disaster puts God's care for the righteous on display.
Yet the evil day only brings out God's faithful care over the righteous. The wicked, just as surely, meet the due reward of their deeds. It is, however, a humiliating as well as a sifting time for God's people... God holds to His righteous government in a day of confusion, and warns.
This short line is easy to miss. One writer maps the whole section and points to it as the moment the faithful come into view.
Here the kingdom, pictured as "a mountain," comes into view at the beginning, and appears in some of its glories at the end. But corruption and judgment are the main material in between, though this prophecy opens and closes with glory. Yet the remnant are seen for a moment (Isa. 3:10).
The reason given is a harvest: people eat what their own conduct has grown. One writer sets this beside the same rule in the New Testament.
It is the Apostle of grace who writes: "Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap" (Gal. 6:7), and again: "Whoever sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and whoever sows bountifully will also reap bountifully" (2 Cor. 9:6)... "Behold, the righteous shall be recompensed on the earth: much more the wicked and the sinner" (Prov. 11:31).
(The Proverbs line follows an older English translation; the ESV renders it, "If the righteous is repaid on earth, how much more the wicked and the sinner!")
The promise is not that the righteous escape hardship. The outcome is certain. Writing on a psalm with the same words, one commentator ties the phrase to God's government of His people.
A soul kept in holiness before God enjoys the sense of His favour, and this soon proves to be the secret of all true happiness... So Isaiah speaks: "Tell the righteous that it shall be well with them." Peter teaches the same in his first letter: God's government is in favour of His people. So the godly Israelite is taught this. Sorrows and trials might still lie ahead. But God's eye was upon him, and good would be the certain outcome of God's government and ways.
None of this happened quickly. One writer explains why the delay changed nothing.
The famine, confusion and oppression, with the miseries that go with them, would ruin Jerusalem. They might not come on the people at once, but they would come in the end. Even so, God would favour the righteous, as verse 10 shows.
Some writers also read verses 10 and 11 forward, to a day when God tells the two groups apart.
Isaiah seems to see those two in the bed, at the mill, and in the field, in this day of the Lord (Isa. 3:10-11; Isa. 33:14-16). Malachi also looks at them in the day of discerning. The same Sun that rises with healing in His wings on the one will burn like an oven for the other (Mal. 3, 4). For this day of the Lord will act with discerning, or in judgment. One shall be taken, and the other left.
- Sown — people eat what their own conduct has grown. The New Testament says the same: whatever a person sows, that he will also reap.
- Seen — a chapter full of corruption and judgment still lifts the faithful into view for a moment. A nation's collapse does not hide them.
- Kept — the evil day only brings out God's faithful care for the righteous. He holds to His righteous government in a day of confusion.
- Settled — sorrows and trials may still come, yet the good outcome is certain. What God delays, He has not cancelled.
- Separated — the two verses point on to a day of discerning. The same Sun heals one and burns the other; one is taken and the other left.
Woe unto the wicked! it shall be ill [with him], because the desert of his hands shall be rendered unto him.
Isaiah describes a society falling apart, where leaders fail and the men in charge crush the poor. In the middle of that collapse God separates two kinds of people, and verse 11 is His verdict on the wicked.
The ruin is national; the verdict is personal. One writer notes that a dark time is what brings God's steady dealing into view:
The evil day only brings out the faithful care of God over the righteous, just as surely as the wicked meet with the due reward of their deeds. It is, however, a humbling as well as a sifting time for God's people. Yet the prophet declares in the liveliest terms how the Lord takes up the cause of the poor against those who crush them… God holds to His righteous government in a day of confusion, and warns.
The woe is not bad luck catching up with a man. It is a settled principle by which God still runs the world, and it operates in this life, separately from the question of eternal forgiveness:
This, however, is not grace but government. It is true of a saint as well as of a sinner. "Do not be deceived: God is not mocked… the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption." It is grace as to sins eternally, but righteous government as to wrongdoing down here. God never lets go the reins of government, even over the world, although for a season He did not step in with governmental power.
The verse traces what comes back to the man's own hands. That removes any charge of cruelty against God. It also leaves the door open:
He has only himself to blame. He is reaping what he sowed… God is not arbitrary when He punishes the wicked. They store up wrath for themselves "on the day of wrath when God's righteous judgment will be revealed."… The talk about God being "too merciful to send men to hell" is wicked and empty. Men show no mercy to themselves. They have only themselves to blame for their doom. And all this is the sharper because infinite love has provided a free remedy, which so many reject.
A reader could look around and see the opposite: the oppressors thriving, the godly suffering. One writer faces that squarely:
Is it not His reign? Yet evil abounds and the righteous suffer. Still His moral government never fails, whatever appearances may promise for a while. The day will declare everything.
Verse 11 is one half of a pair. One writer sees Isaiah's two verses standing over the contrasts collected in Proverbs:
The contrast in Proverbs between the righteous and the wicked continues in this chapter. It shows mostly the advantage of the righteous, and it illustrates a statement in the prophet Isaiah: it will be well with the righteous, for they will eat the fruit of their deeds (Isaiah 3:10). Then the contrast: "Woe to the wicked! It shall be ill with him, for what his hands have dealt out shall be done to him" (verse 11). The righteous eats good by the fruit of his mouth; the transgressor receives violence. There is plenty for the soul of the diligent and nothing for the soul of the lazy. Righteousness keeps; wickedness overthrows. While the light of the righteous rejoices, the lamp of the wicked will be put out.
One writer reads these two verses as pointing forward to the day of the Lord:
Isaiah appears to see those two in the bed, at the mill, and in the field, in this day of the Lord… Malachi also looks at them in the day of discerning, when the same Sun that rises with healing in His wings on the one will burn as an oven for the other. For this day of the Lord will act with discerning, or in judgment. One will be taken, and the other left.
- Deed. The woe follows conduct, not circumstance. What comes back to the wicked man comes from his own hands.
- Harvest. This is God's government, not His grace. A man reaps what he sows, and God never lets go of the reins, even when He seems not to act.
- Justice. No one can call God arbitrary. The man's own work returns to him, and he refused a free remedy.
- Delay. Evil abounds and the righteous suffer. Still God's moral government never fails. The day will declare everything.
- Division. Verses 10 and 11 are a matched pair. The day of the Lord will act with discernment: the same Sun that heals the one burns the other.
[As for] my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. My people! they that guide thee mislead [thee], and destroy the way of thy paths.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Jehovah setteth himself to plead, and standeth to judge the peoples.
Isaiah has just described a nation whose leaders mislead it. The men meant to protect the poor are the ones crushing them. Verse 13 turns the scene into a courtroom. God Himself stands up to argue the case.
To contend is to argue a case in court. God steps forward for those who have no one to speak for them. The case He argues is against His own nation's leaders. One writer names who is on trial, and what they had done.
This is a humiliating time for God's people, and a sifting one. Yet the prophet declares in the most vivid terms how Jehovah takes up the cause of the poor against those who grind down their faces... That covers the rulers and princes. Others might plunder their enemies and enrich their followers at their neighbours' expense. But the civil and religious chiefs of Israel were so degraded and depraved that they preyed on the flesh and blood of their own brothers for their own greed and gain. The defenceless poor came off worst in this scene of flattery one moment and oppression the next. How true it is that the corruption of the best thing is the worst corruption!
The men God calls to account were themselves judges. One writer explains where their power came from, and what God did when they misused it.
We find God taking the government into His own hands. He had set up authority on the earth, and especially in Israel. The judges in Israel had carried the name of God (Elohim). His word guided them in judgment, and His authority armed them. But none of them would understand or act righteously... God, who had given the authority, judged among the gods — He must have righteousness.
Why does God begin at the top? One writer states the principle.
All the people have their responsibility. But the chief weight must fall according to each person's position. Wickedness in a man who holds an office of trust is worse than the same evil in someone under him, and justice rightly counts it as more serious. Wrongdoing in a judge, for instance, is graver than dishonesty in a stable-hand or his master. Corruption or tyranny in a king is deeper guilt than faults here or there among his subjects.
This court calls rulers to account. It also takes note of far smaller things.
Divine judgment notices every detail of wrongdoing, oppression, and even vanity. All must be brought low.
Another writer compares this record with the way human historians write.
Isaiah exposes the luxury that ruins a people inside their own homes. No historian, in the Bible or outside it, does it as fully or in as much detail... Inspired prophecy deals with the infinitely great. It also digs into the smallest things and lays them bare, because these too come under God's eyes. History in man's hand would be ashamed to go down so low.
God stands to judge peoples. Yet one writer sees Him starting with what is nearest to Him. That raises a question for everyone who claims His name.
The middle part of Isaiah 2 and the whole of Isaiah 3 uncover the evil and ruin of Zion, both publicly and privately. Judgment begins at God's house. What will it be for Christendom, which is favoured still more?
- He stands. God does not stay seated while men devour His people. He rises, takes His place, and opens the case Himself.
- He pleads. He stands up for the crushed and the poor, against those who grind their faces.
- He judges the judges. Israel's rulers held their authority from Him. When they refused to act righteously, He took the government back into His own hands.
- He misses nothing. Every detail of oppression and vanity is on record. God's eye goes lower than any historian would dare.
- He starts near home. Judgment begins with what is closest to God. That makes this courtroom a warning to those who claim His name, not a show to watch.
Jehovah will enter into judgment with the elders of his people and their princes, [saying] It is ye that have eaten up the vineyard the spoil of the poor is in your houses.
God calls His own appointed leaders to court. The elders and princes stand accused, and the charge is theft from the people they were meant to protect. Two questions run through the verse: whose vineyard was it, and why does God single out the leaders?
The ESV reads "devoured the vineyard"; older translations say "eaten up." Either way the wording is not a loose insult. It reaches back to a law about letting your own animal graze on someone else's land, and the Hebrew verb is the same in both places.
Isaiah 3:14, "You have eaten up the vineyard," points back to Exodus 22:5. That law says: "If a man causes a field or vineyard to be eaten, and puts in his own beast, and it feeds in another man's field, he shall make restitution from the best of his own field and of his own vineyard." The Hebrew word for "eat" is unusual, and it is the same in both places. So there is no doubt about the reference.
So the leaders turned their own appetite loose on land that was not theirs. The law they broke demanded repayment out of the offender's own best.
Isaiah 5 explains the picture, naming both the owner and the caretakers.
Isaiah 5:1-7 explains the truth of the vineyard planted by a man: "the vineyard of the LORD of hosts is the house of Israel" (v. 7). The hedge speaks of her separation from the nations. The place for the winepress tells of the provision God had made, so that Israel could give Him some return for His great goodness. The tower shows watchfulness against the intrusion of evil. The tenant farmers are of course the elders of the people, and God gave them the responsibility of caring for the nation on His behalf.
So the elders ate what God had given them to guard.
Plunder is common enough in war. What makes this case so ugly is who the victims were.
Others might plunder their enemies and enrich their followers at their neighbours' expense. But the civil and religious chiefs of Israel were so degraded and depraved that they preyed on the flesh and blood of their own brothers for their own greed and gain. The defenceless poor came off worst in this scene of flattery and oppression by turns. How true it is that the corruption of the best thing is the worst corruption!
The stolen goods needed no witness. They were sitting in the leaders' own houses.
God does not weigh every offender alike.
All the people have their responsibility. But the chief weight must fall according to a person's position. Wickedness in a man who holds an office of trust is worse than the same evil in someone under him, and it deserves to be treated as more serious. Sin in a judge, for instance, has a graver character than dishonesty in a stableman or his master. Corruption or tyranny in a king is deeper guilt than failings here or there in any of his subjects.
The same appetite has a Christian version today.
What the leaders in Israel did, it is possible for the leaders in the Christian assembly to do, but for the grace of God. In later years the Apostle Paul warns us about men of corrupt minds who push into the Christian circle. They "suppose gain to be the end of piety" (1 Tim. 6:5). The Apostle Peter, who presents the Church as the House of God, warns leaders against feeding the flock of God for dishonest gain (1 Peter 5:2). So we learn that the flesh never changes.
The poor are not a side issue in Scripture. God tracks what is done to them, and He has an answer coming.
All through the Word of God we are told to remember the poor with kindness. God gives most blessed promises to those who obey these gracious words. See Proverbs 14:21; 19:17; Psalm 41:1. Oppression of the poor is a sin God takes special note of. See Isaiah 3:14, 15; 10:2; Amos 2:6; James 2:6. When the Lord comes He will remember the poor and deliver them. See Psalm 72:2, 4, 12, 13; Isaiah 11:4.
- Entrusted. The vineyard is the house of Israel. God planted it, hedged it and equipped it. The elders cared for it on His behalf; they never owned it.
- Devoured. "Eaten up" echoes the law of Exodus 22:5 about letting your animal graze another man's field. That debt had to be repaid out of the offender's own best.
- Exposed. The plunder did not come from enemies. It came from their own defenceless brothers, and it sat in their own houses.
- Weighed. Sin in a man who holds an office of trust weighs heavier than the same sin in someone under him. The danger did not end with Israel: leaders who serve for gain repeat it.
- Reversed. Oppression of the poor is a sin God marks. When the Lord comes He will remember the poor and deliver them.
What mean ye that ye crush my people, and grind the faces of the afflicted? saith the Lord, Jehovah of hosts.
The verse closes a courtroom scene: God has called the leaders of His people to answer for what they did to the poor. No oppressor can answer that question, and the name signed under it settles the outcome.
The poor do not plead their own case. The Lord takes it up for them, and He is not calm about it.
Even so, the evil day only brings out God's faithful care over the righteous, as surely as the wicked receive what their deeds deserve. It is a humiliating time for God's people, and a sifting one. Yet the prophet declares in the liveliest terms how Jehovah takes up the cause of the poor against those who grind down their faces.
What makes the crime so ugly is who the victims were. These were not foreign captives or the spoils of war.
Others might plunder their enemies and enrich their followers at their neighbours' expense. But the civil and religious chiefs of Israel were so degraded and depraved that they preyed on the flesh and blood of their own brothers for their own greed and gain. The defenceless poor fared worst in this scene of flattery and oppression by turns. How true it is that the corruption of the best thing is the worst corruption!
God brings this charge against the rulers. Why them, when the whole nation was guilty?
All the people have their responsibility. But the chief weight must fall according to each person's position. Wickedness in a man who holds an office of trust is worse than the same evil in someone under him, and rightly counts as more serious. Wrongdoing in a judge, for instance, is graver than dishonesty in a stable-hand or his master. Corruption or tyranny in a king is deeper guilt than this or that failing in any of his subjects.
Grinding a face is not only an old crime. Kelly applies the phrase to the way employers handle work and wages.
The employment of labour is often carried on in a hard spirit, grinding the faces of the poor. It is no compensation when employers give generously to so-called Christian or charitable causes what has been wrung out of tears and curses. In God's eyes it makes matters worse. And how much do trade and commerce have to answer for in the oppressive desire to grow rich!
The weight of the question comes from who asks it. The verse ends with a title Isaiah uses again and again.
Jehovah-Sabaoth carries the meaning, the Lord of hosts. It occurs over three hundred times in the Old Testament. Among the Jehovah names it is the one exception that finds its place in the New Testament. (See Romans 9:29; James 5:4.) This combination is spread widely through the Old Testament. Isaiah alone has sixty occurrences of this beautiful title. It carries the thought of mighty, irresistible power and resource in the hands of the Lord.
The judgment of this chapter is not limited to the great crimes.
God's judgment notices every detail of wrongdoing, oppression, and even vanity. All must be brought low.
This verse stands in a long line of Scripture about the poor. That line runs forward to a day of rescue.
Oppression of the poor is a sin that God specially marks. See Isaiah 3:14, 15; 10:2; Ezekiel 18:11-13; Amos 2:6; 4:1; 5:11; James 2:6. When the Lord comes He will remember the poor and deliver them. See Psalm 72:2, 4, 12, 13; 113:7; 132:15; Isaiah 11:4.
- The crime. Oppression of the poor is a sin God marks. His judgment notices every detail, from a nation's ruin down to vanity.
- The victims. The poor do not plead their own case. The Lord takes up their cause Himself. The guilt is deepest because the victims were the leaders' own brothers.
- The weight. The same sin weighs more in an office of trust. Wrong in a judge is graver than dishonesty in a servant. Tyranny in a king is deeper guilt than a subject's failings.
- The reach. Grinding faces still happens wherever employers handle work in a hard spirit. Giving away money wrung from tears makes it worse, not better.
- The verdict. The question ends with the name Lord GOD of hosts. That title means irresistible power and resource. When He comes, He will remember the poor and deliver them.
And Jehovah said, Because the daughters of Zion are haughty, and walk with stretched-out neck and wanton eyes, and go along mincing, and making a tinkling with their feet;
Isaiah turns from the leaders of the nation to the women of Jerusalem. The charge lists small things: a posture, a look, a walk, the sound of ornaments on the ankles.
Zion was a real hill in a real city, and the phrase points to real people:
Zion was literally the south-eastern height called David's city. Moriah was the north-eastern one, where the Lord's house stood. But the prophets often use Zion in a figurative way, and as another word for Jerusalem as a whole. "Daughter of Zion" is a poetic expression for the inhabitants of the Jewish capital, and so for the people in general. "Daughters of Zion" would represent rather its female inhabitants.
These are small things, but God reads what they say about the home:
When women live for display in clothing, nothing more is needed to charge them with this: the holiness of the home is spoiled, and there is no real heart for the relationships God has set up. Such finery is certainly not for a husband or the family. Small as it is, it does not escape the withering notice of the Judge of all. Dress, walk, glances, are all noticed by the Spirit of God.
The same writer compares this with what human history records:
No historian, in the Bible or outside it, exposes so fully and in such detail the luxury that ruins a people from the inside, in their own homes, as Isaiah does here... Along with the infinitely great, inspired prophecy penetrates and lays bare the smallest things, as coming equally under God's eyes. History in man's hand would be ashamed to go down so low.
The outstretched neck and the tinkling feet were a message, and God read it:
There is no doubt at all that showy, gaudy clothing shows pride of heart. It also shows a desire to attract admiring looks from the people around. We have an instance in Isaiah 3:16 and following... They wanted others to notice their chains and bracelets, rings and nose-jewels, their bonnets and mantles, hoods and veils. All this showed plainly enough that their hearts were as empty of the fear of the Lord as their heads were of any sense of womanly propriety. So the Lord warns them that He will certainly judge them for their worldly ways.
The women shared in the evil of the day, and the men they dressed for would not last:
The evil of the day was not confined to the leaders, or to the men of the nation... The women also were deeply involved. Their state is denounced from verse 16 to the end of the chapter. They used every trick well practised in the pagan world to make themselves more attractive. And, as the closing verses state, the very men they tried to attract would fall by the sword, and so fail them.
The answer is not carelessness about dress, but a better ornament:
Scripture does not tell us to neglect dress, or even adornment. On the contrary, we should pay attention to it, but according to the word of God... Our dress should suit the "meek and quiet spirit," so that dress and character agree. Ornaments are allowed too. But they should be made of good works, not of gold or pearls, "as becomes women professing godliness."
The point does not stay in Isaiah's day:
This chapter describes the corrupt conditions among the professing people of God in Isaiah's day. A similar corruption and worldliness prevailing in our age demands divine judgment.
Judgment is not the last word for Zion's daughters. The same day ends with them washed clean:
The prophet describes the wide-spreading judgment of the day of the Lord in vivid detail. It ends with the cloud of glory, familiar to the people in the wilderness, resting over the earthly Jerusalem, "when the Lord shall have washed away the filth of the daughters of Zion, and shall have purged the blood of Jerusalem from its midst, by the spirit of judgment and by the spirit of burning."
- Seen. God notices dress, walk and glances. Prophecy stoops to details a human historian would be ashamed to record.
- Exposed. The parade of finery is not for husband or family. It reveals pride of heart, a hunger for admiration, and a home whose holiness is already spoiled.
- Failed. The very men they dressed to attract fall by the sword, and so fail them.
- Adorned. The remedy is not neglect but a better ornament. Dress should match a meek and quiet spirit, and the jewellery should be good works.
- Washed. The chapter's judgment ends in mercy — the Lord Himself washes away the filth of the daughters of Zion.
therefore the Lord will make bald the crown of the head of the daughters of Zion, and Jehovah will lay bare their secret parts.
Isaiah 3 turns from the nation's rulers to the women of Jerusalem. God's sentence falls on the very things they used for display: the head they crowned, and the body they paraded. Why does God speak so strongly about clothing, walk and glances?
Who is being judged here? One writer sets the singular and the plural side by side:
"Daughter of Zion" (as in Isaiah 1:9) is a poetic phrase for the people who live in the Jewish capital, and so for the people in general. "Daughters of Zion" (as in Isaiah 3:16) stands instead for its women. We may add that it is nothing but ignorance to assume that Zion anywhere means the church of God, even as a picture.
Verse 16 lists the offences in fine detail. That detail is the point: small habits of dress and manner show what has gone wrong at home.
When women live for display in dress, no further proof is needed to charge them with this: the holiness of the home is spoiled, and there is no real heart for the relationships God has set up. Such finery is certainly not for a husband or the family. Small as it is, it does not escape the withering notice of the Judge of all. Dress, walk and glances are all noticed by the Spirit of God.
Another writer sums up the chapter in one line:
Divine judgment notices every detail of iniquity, oppression, and even vanity. All must be brought low.
The jewellery was not the real problem. It was evidence. One writer traces the ornaments back to the heart behind them:
There is no doubt at all that showy, flashy clothing shows pride of heart and a wish to attract admiring looks from the people around. We have an example in Isaiah 3:16... They wanted others to notice their chains and bracelets, rings and nose-jewels, their bonnets and cloaks, hoods and veils. All this showed clearly that their hearts were as empty of the fear of the Lord as their heads were of any sense of what is fitting for a woman. So the Lord warns them that He will certainly judge them for their worldly ways... This is one side. And, wrong as this side is, those who rush into the opposite extreme are just as wrong... Dress, we must remember, is only the outward thing. Unless the heart is right, all else is wrong.
The chapter has two halves, and this verse belongs to the second. Both are grounds for God stepping in.
Human pride everywhere must be brought down. But this chapter shows that the blow will fall hardest on Jerusalem and Judah — not only on their public political life, but closely and searchingly on the daughters of Zion, in all their proud little shows of vanity. Here we have this double ground for God stepping in... Everyone left in Jerusalem will then be called holy, when the Lord has washed away the filth of Zion's daughters.
This sentence is not God's last word. The same writer looks past the trouble to what comes after it:
This time of trouble is followed by a shining out of beauty and glory, and abundant mercy for the saved and holy remnant... This one Man, the Messiah, will be the restorer of all breaches, and holiness will be a reality, not a mere name, in Jerusalem. Yet it is not by the gospel of grace as we have it now, but by the spirit of judgment and by the spirit of burning... It is not the church but Israel that is in question, and her purification by judgment.
Commentators apply the chapter beyond Isaiah's day. One puts the parallel plainly:
Similar corruption and worldliness in our own age call for God's judgment.
Another sets the New Testament answer beside the picture in Isaiah:
The daughters of Zion also decked themselves out in fine linen, hoods and veils — until burning came instead of beauty, and desolation came to the gates of the city. Scripture calls the Christian woman to modest dress, modest bearing and self-control, and to a meek and gentle spirit, which in the sight of God is of great worth.
- Pride displayed. The daughters of Zion are the women of Jerusalem. Their ornaments showed a heart that wanted admiration.
- Pride noticed. God notices dress, walk and glances. Nothing is too small for the Judge of all.
- Pride exposed. Judgment strips bare what they paraded — the head struck, the body uncovered.
- Pride brought low. The blow falls on the nation's public life and on private vanity alike. All must be brought low.
- Pride washed away. The same Lord who exposes the filth of Zion's daughters will one day wash it away. That cleansing comes by the spirit of judgment and burning, not by the gospel as now.
In that day the Lord will take away the ornament of anklets, and the little suns and crescents,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
the pearl-drops, and the bracelets, and the veils,
This is not a fashion note but a judgment list. Item by item, the Lord names what He will strip from the proud women of Jerusalem. Behind three small ornaments sits a larger question: why does God notice jewelry at all?
Older translations read "chains… bracelets… mufflers." The first word names an ornament worn at the neck:
A jewel or appendage. Judges 8:26. In the margin it is 'sweet jewels.' The Revised Version has 'pendants.' The same word is translated 'chains' in Isaiah 3:19. In Job 30:18 it is simply the collar of a coat: the mouth or opening for the throat.
The third word is harder. The suggested meanings all circle one idea: something delicate that catches the eye as the wearer moves:
Mentioned among the women's ornaments in Isaiah 3:19. The word is raal, which is translated 'trembling' in Zechariah 12:2. It is thought to refer to some light ornament that would flutter as the wearer moved. The margin renders it 'spangled ornaments.' Gesenius has 'veils.'
The list is long because God's attention is exact. What these women wore was evidence about their homes:
When women live for display in dress, that alone proves the charge against them. The holiness of the home is tainted, and there is no real heart for the relations God has set up. Such finery is certainly not for a husband or the family. Small as it is, it does not escape the withering notice of the Judge of all. Dress, gait, glances, are all noticed by the Spirit of God.
Some say prophecy deals only in broad principles, and history in facts. This long list answers that:
Nowhere in the Bible or outside it does any historian expose so fully and in such detail the luxury that ruins a people from within, in their homes, as Isaiah does here. He does so after striking a deadly blow at their dishonour of the true God and their craving for false gods. It would be truer to say this: alongside the infinitely great, inspired prophecy digs down and lays bare the smallest things, as equally under God's eyes. History in man's hand would be ashamed to go down so low.
One writer applies the same test to how Christians furnish their homes:
They speak of separation from the world, but their houses look painfully worldly… Someone may say it is taking low ground to go down to such details. I reply: the daughters of Zion might just as well have said the same about this solemn appeal: "In that day the Lord will take away the finery of the anklets…"
Yet the correction can be overdone. Another writer sees showy dress as a heart wanting admiration — and warns against the opposite error:
There is no doubt at all that bright, showy clothing shows pride of heart and a wish to attract admiring looks from people around… They wanted others to notice their chains and bracelets, rings and nose-jewels, their bonnets and mantles, hoods and veils… This is one side. And, wrong as this side is, those who rush into the other extreme are no less wrong. When the Pharisees fasted, they put ashes on their head and dirtied and disfigured their faces. They looked deeply sad — but only so that people would think they were fasting.
Everything in Isaiah's list could be stripped off. The New Testament names an adornment that cannot be:
"Do not let your adorning be external — the braiding of hair and the putting on of gold jewelry, or the clothing you wear — but let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart with the imperishable beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which in God's sight is very precious." There is a beautiful hint at fashion here, because nothing changes like fashion. But the apostle says you are to have an ornament that is always the same.
The stripping is not the end. In the next chapter the ornament returns — in a Person:
In this connection it is very instructive to compare what is said of ornaments in Isaiah 3 and 4. In the earlier chapter, the Lord takes away all the ornaments of the daughters of Zion, and everything would be ruin and corruption. But chapter 4 speaks of Christ as "a sprout of Jehovah for beauty and glory, and the fruit of the earth for excellency and for ornament for those that are escaped of Israel."
That last line follows an older translation, which keeps the word "ornament."
- Ornaments named. Neck pendants, bracelets, and a light ornament or veil. The third name comes from a word meaning "trembling" — something that flutters as the wearer walks.
- Ornaments noticed. Dress, walk and glances all come under God's eye; the display was proof that the heart for home and family had gone.
- Ornaments recorded. Inspired prophecy goes down to details that human history would blush to record. The smallest things fall under God's view.
- Ornaments tested. The same test reaches a Christian's home and wardrobe today. Studied plainness can be as much a show as finery.
- Ornaments replaced. What chapter 3 strips away, chapter 4 restores in Christ. The gentle, quiet spirit is the one ornament that never changes, and God calls it precious.
the head-dresses, and the stepping chains, and the girdles, and the scent-boxes, and the amulets;
This verse sits in the middle of a long list. Item after item of jewellery and finery, and the Lord says He will strip it all from the women of Jerusalem. Two questions follow. Why would God list such small things at all? And what were they?
One writer sets the wider frame. Isaiah turns from the coming day of the Lord back to the people as they were.
Having spoken of the day of the Lord and its effects in Isaiah 2, Isaiah deals again in Isaiah 3 with the state the people were in. He also makes plain how God was chastening them, and would go on doing so. The famine, confusion and oppression, with all the misery that came with them, would ruin Jerusalem. It might not come on them at once, but it would come in the end — though God would favour the righteous, as verse 10 shows. The elders and princes of the people were the leaders in the evil of that day.
Some words here are strange even in English. Older translations make them harder still. The "earrings" of the older reading are not jewellery for the ear at all:
The well-known ornament worn by women and men in the East. Genesis 24:22, 30, 47; Job 42:11; Hosea 2:13; etc. In Isaiah 3:20 the allusion is not to a ring for the ear, but to an amulet on which a charm could be written.
The "tablets" of the older reading are likewise something else — the ESV's "perfume boxes":
In the Old Testament the word kumaz signifies ornaments. Exodus 35:22; Numbers 31:50. In Isaiah 3:20 they are supposed to be receptacles for perfume. The margin reads 'houses of the soul,' which agrees with the Hebrew beth nephesh.
So the list mixes fashion with superstition: scent bottles beside charms.
The finery is more than excess. One commentator draws a line from what these women wore to what their homes had become.
When women live for display in clothing, nothing more is needed to lay this charge at their door: the holiness of the home is spoiled, and there is no real heart for the relationships God has set up. Such finery is certainly not for a husband or the family. Small as it is, it does not escape the withering notice of the Judge of all. Dress, walk and looks are all noticed by the Spirit of God.
The very smallness of the list is the point.
Nowhere in the Bible, or outside it, does any historian expose so fully and in such detail the luxury that ruins a people from within, in their own homes, as Isaiah does here. And he does it after striking a deadly blow at their dishonour of the true God and their craving for false gods. It would be truer to say that, along with the infinitely great, inspired prophecy searches out and lays bare the smallest things as coming alike under God's eyes. History written by man would be ashamed to go down so low.
Clothing here exposes the heart, and one writer warns that the fault can run in two directions.
There can be no doubt at all that showy, gaudy clothing shows pride of heart and a wish to draw admiring looks from the people around. We have an example in Isaiah 3:16 and the verses after it. There the Lord speaks very sternly to the daughters of Zion... They wanted others to notice their chains and bracelets, rings and nose-jewels, their bonnets and mantles, hoods and veils. All this showed plainly that their hearts were as empty of the fear of the Lord as their heads were of any proper sense of how a woman should behave. So the Lord warns them that He will surely judge them for their worldly ways. This is one side. And wrong as this side is, those who rush to the other extreme are just as wrong.
God takes away every item in this verse. One writer points to an ornament of a different kind.
- Noticed. Dress, walk and looks all come under God's eye. Prophecy lays bare the smallest things, going lower than any historian would stoop.
- Named. The strange words clear up. The "earrings" are amulets with a charm written on them; the "tablets" are perfume boxes. Fashion and superstition side by side.
- Evidence. One writer reads living for display as proof that the home has lost its holiness, since such finery is not for husband or family.
- Taken away. God strips off the whole list, as part of His chastening of a city whose leaders led the way in evil.
- Kept. Nothing changes as fast as fashion. A gentle and quiet spirit is the one ornament that never alters, and God calls it very precious.
the finger-rings, and the nose-rings;
In Isaiah 3 God lists the jewellery of the women of Jerusalem, piece by piece, before He takes it all away. Verse 21 adds two more items to that list, and it raises a question: why does God's word stop to count rings?
One of the two items here is hard for a modern reader to picture:
These were rings decorated with jewels. They usually passed through the right side of the nostril and hung down by the mouth. Proverbs 11:22 points to this way of decorating: "Like a gold ring in a pig's snout is a beautiful woman without discretion." Isaiah 3:21 lists the nose jewels among the other ornaments of women that God would take away in His judgments. Ezekiel 16:12 lists ornaments as a picture of how God adorned Jerusalem, and there the words "a jewel on your forehead" should read "a ring upon your nose."
Jewellery is a small thing. One writer shows what a life built on display says about the home behind it:
When women live for display in clothing, that is proof enough in itself. It lays the charge at their door: the holiness of the home is spoiled, and there is no real heart for the relationships God has set up. Such finery is certainly not for a husband or the family. Small as it is, it does not escape the searching notice of the Judge of all. Dress, walk, glances, are all noticed by the Spirit of God.
Some say prophecy deals in broad principles and history in particular facts. This long list of jewellery says otherwise:
Isaiah first deals a deadly blow at their dishonouring of the true God and their craving after false ones. Then he exposes the luxury that ruins a people from within, in their own homes. No other historian, in the Bible or outside it, has exposed it so fully or in such detail. It would be truer to say that inspired prophecy reaches the infinitely great and lays bare the smallest things too. Both alike come under God's eyes. History written by men would be ashamed to stoop this low.
Some say details like these are beneath spiritual teaching. One writer answers that, and then turns the question on our own homes:
The Spirit of God can go down to small details when the details are there to go down to. But someone may object further: "We must furnish our houses according to our rank in life." Wherever people press this objection, it fully reveals the real ground of the objector's soul. That ground is the world, without question. "Our rank in life!" What does this really mean, as applied to those who profess to be dead?
The stripping is not the end of the story. Something far better replaces what is taken away, in words from an older translation:
It is very instructive to compare what Isaiah 3 and 4 say about ornaments. In chapter 3, all the ornaments of the daughters of Zion are to be taken away, and everything would be ruin and corruption. But chapter 4 speaks of Christ as "a sprout of Jehovah for beauty and glory, and the fruit of the earth for excellency and for ornament for those that are escaped of Israel."
One writer takes up the apostle's words about a wife's adorning, and the ornament God counts precious:
There is a beautiful allusion to fashion here, because nothing changes so fast as fashion. But the apostle says you are to have an ornament that is always the same. Oh, to own what is of great price in the sight of God — the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit! It does not show in the things the world around notices. Only those who are in close contact with the wearer can see it and understand it.
- Named — The nose ring was a jewelled ring worn through the nostril. Proverbs compares gold in the wrong place to a ring in a pig's snout.
- Noticed — Dress, walk and glances all come under the eye of the Judge of all; the small things are not too small for God to see.
- Itemised — Prophecy goes lower than any human historian would dare. It exposes the luxury that ruins a people inside their own homes.
- Applied — The excuse that our homes must match "our rank in life" shows where the heart really stands. Christians profess to have died to that world.
- Exchanged — Chapter 3 strips every ornament away. Chapter 4 sets Christ before Israel as beauty and glory, and the ornament God prizes never goes out of fashion.
the festival-robes, and the tunics, and the mantles, and the wallets;
This verse names four more items in a long list of luxuries God says He will strip from the women of Jerusalem. Why does a prophecy about a nation's collapse stop to count handbags and shawls, and what is God judging?
The last item on the list is not something worn. It is something carried.
Most take these to be bags or purses, richly decorated. Isaiah 3:22. The Hebrew word is charitim, and it is translated 'bags' in 2 Kings 5:23.
The word behind "cloaks" names a large outer covering. It was big enough to serve as a sack.
The wimple, or veil, was a wide outer garment or shawl that covered the head and part of the body. Ruth could carry six measures of barley in such a veil. Ruth 3:15; Isaiah 3:22. There are four other Hebrew words translated 'veils.'
The list is not filler. A wardrobe can report on a home.
When women live to show off their clothes, you need no further proof to lay this charge at their door: the holiness of the home is spoiled, and there is no real heart for the relationships God has set up. Such finery is certainly not for a husband or the family. Small as it is, it does not escape the searching notice of the Judge of all. Dress, walk and looks are all noticed by the Spirit of God.
People expect prophecy to deal in broad principles and history in small facts. This chapter turns that around.
Nowhere in the Bible or outside it does any historian expose so fully and in such detail the luxury that ruins a people from the inside, in their own homes, as Isaiah does here. He has just struck a deadly blow at their dishonour of the true God and their craving for false gods. It would be truer to say that, along with the infinitely great, inspired prophecy searches out and lays bare the smallest things, as things that equally come under God's eyes. History written by man would be ashamed to go down so low.
Clothing is evidence. It tells what the heart wants.
There is no doubt at all that showy, flashy clothing shows pride of heart and a desire to draw admiring looks from the people around. We have an example in Isaiah 3:16 and the verses after it. There the Lord speaks very sternly to the daughters of Zion. They walked with their necks stretched out and their eyes full of desire, taking short, dainty steps and jingling the ornaments on their feet. They wanted others to notice their chains and bracelets, rings and nose-rings, their bonnets and mantles, hoods and veils. All this showed clearly that their hearts were as empty of the fear of the Lord as their heads were of any sense of what was fitting for a woman. So the Lord warns them that He will surely judge them for their worldly ways.
If God can list a wardrobe, He can list the furniture in a home. Small details are not beneath Him.
The Spirit of God can go down to details when the details are there to go down to. But someone may object further, "We must furnish our houses to match our rank in life." Wherever people press this objection, it shows exactly what ground their soul is standing on. That ground is the world, without question.
The stripping is not the end of the story. The next chapter names a different ornament.
It is very instructive to compare what is said about ornaments in Isaiah 3 and 4. In chapter 3, all the ornaments of the daughters of Zion are to be taken away, and everything would be ruin and corruption. But in chapter 4, Christ is spoken of as "a sprout of Jehovah for beauty and glory, and the fruit of the earth for excellency and for ornament for those that are escaped of Israel."
- Named — The verse ends with decorated bags or purses. It also names a wide shawl-like veil, big enough to hold six measures of barley.
- Noticed — God sees dress, walk and looks. Clothing worn for show, not for husband or family, does not escape the Judge of all.
- Exposed — Showy clothing points to pride and a craving for admiration. It marks a heart empty of the fear of the Lord.
- Extended — The same search reaches into the home. The Spirit of God goes down to details when the details are there.
- Exchanged — Chapter 3 takes every ornament away. Chapter 4 speaks of Christ as beauty, glory and ornament for those in Israel who escape.
the mirrors, and the fine linen bodices, and the turbans, and the flowing veils.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And it shall come to pass, instead of perfume there shall be rottenness; and instead of a girdle, a rope; and instead of well-set hair, baldness; and instead of a robe of display, a girding of sackcloth; brand instead of beauty.
Just before this verse, Isaiah lists the jewellery and finery of the women of Jerusalem, item by item. This verse is God's answer to that list: five swaps, each one turning something prized into something wretched. Why would God speak in such detail about perfume, belts and hairstyles? And is ruin His last word to a people He once made beautiful?
God's sentence reaches down into the details. One writer sums up the whole chapter in a line.
Divine judgment notices every detail of iniquity, oppression, and even vanity. All must be brought low.
That detail settles an argument about prophecy itself.
Look at this long stretch of detail. How can anyone still claim, as many have, that history gives particular facts while prophecy gives only general principles? No historian, in the Bible or outside it, exposes so fully and in such detail the luxury that ruins a people inside their own homes. Isaiah does it here, straight after striking a deadly blow at their dishonouring of the true God and their craving for false ones. It is truer to say that inspired prophecy reaches the infinitely great and the smallest things alike, because both come under God's eyes. History in man's hand would be ashamed to go down so low. Poor, proud, deceived man!
What people wear points back to what they live for.
The picture of home life is a sorrowful one. When women live for display in clothing, no more proof is needed. The charge lies at their door: the holiness of the home is spoiled, and there is no real heart for the relationships God has set up. Such finery is certainly not for a husband or the family. Small as it is, it does not escape the withering notice of the Judge of all. The Spirit of God notices dress, walk and glances.
The "rich robe" here translates a word found nowhere else in the Bible. Older versions call it a stomacher.
The STOMACHER, apparently a wide ornamented belt. The word occurs only in Isaiah 3:24.
What replaces it is the standard clothing of grief.
A rough cloth made of hair, used for sacks and coarse clothing. As a symbol of sorrow or repentance, people wore it next to the skin and kept it on at night. They often wore ashes with it.
Bald heads had a history in Israel.
God forbade the Israelites to cut themselves or to make themselves bald for the dead, as the nations around them did, because they were a holy people to the Lord. Baldness is one of the judgements of the Lord: perhaps they would make themselves bald in their distress. Isaiah 3:24; Isaiah 15:2; Isaiah 22:12; Ezekiel 7:18; Amos 8:10; Micah 1:16.
The last swap scorches beauty away. Older translations read "burning instead of beauty" where the ESV has "branding." One writer hears that burning in Song of Solomon, where a woman says, "I am very dark... because the sun has looked upon me."
The blackness she speaks of is on the outside. It is a darkness of complexion — she is sunburnt. The prophet's warning word has come true: "There shall be burning instead of beauty."... The time was when the daughter of Zion was beautiful and glorious, a praise in the earth... But her ingratitude and unfaithfulness had reduced her to the sad condition of a poor sunburnt slave.
Read on one chapter and the stripping is answered. Isaiah 4:2 promises that "the branch of the LORD shall be beautiful and glorious."
It is very instructive to compare what Isaiah 3 and 4 say about ornaments. In chapter 3, all the ornaments of the daughters of Zion are to be taken away, and everything would be ruin and corruption. But chapter 4 speaks of Christ as "a sprout of Jehovah for beauty and glory, and the fruit of the earth for excellency and for ornament for those that are escaped of Israel."
One writer carries the warning into the present.
The daughters of Zion, too, decked themselves out in fine linen, hoods and veils. In the end there was burning instead of beauty, and desolation in the gates of the city. Scripture urges modest clothing, modest bearing and self-control on the Christian woman, along with a meek and gentle spirit. In the sight of God that spirit is of great price.
- Detail. God's judgment reaches down to vanity itself; nothing is too small to be brought low.
- Display. Living for outward show exposes a home with no real heart for the relationships God set up.
- Exchange. Perfume becomes rot. The ornamented belt becomes sackcloth, worn against the skin day and night. Well-set hair becomes the baldness that marks God's judgment.
- Scorching. Beauty burned away leaves the sunburnt slave of Song of Solomon. Her own unfaithfulness ruined a nation that was once a praise in the earth.
- Restoration. Chapter 3 takes every ornament away. Chapter 4 gives Christ Himself as the beauty and ornament of those who escape.
Thy men shall fall by the sword, and thy mighty in the fight;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
and her gates shall lament and mourn; and, stripped, she shall sit upon the ground.
Isaiah 3 ends with a picture, not an argument. The proud city loses her leaders and her finery, and sits on the bare ground like a widow. Why does she come to this, and does she stay there?
The mourning starts at the gates, and in Israel a city gate was far more than a way in and out.
Gates protected a city, but "in the gate" was also the place where people settled many important matters. Boaz wanted the question about Ruth and the inheritance settled, so he went up to the gate. There he debated it with a nearer relative and closed the matter, and the elders witnessed it... To "sit in the gate" was a place of honour: "they who sit in the gate speak against me." Psalm 69:12. It should have been the place of true judgement and justice, but was not always so. Isaiah 29:21; Amos 5:10, 12; Zechariah 8:16... From this it would be a symbol of power.
So when the gates mourn, public life itself is in mourning — the courts, the trade, the seat of power.
Earlier in the chapter Isaiah gives the reason for the fall. One commentator draws a rule from it:
"For Jerusalem is ruined, and Judah is fallen: because their tongue and their doings are against Jehovah, to provoke the eyes of His glory. The look on their faces witnesses against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they do not hide it" (vv. 8, 9). There is no ruin without sin; and here it was frightful and shameless.
Before this verse, the chapter spends ten verses listing anklets, headbands, perfume boxes and veils. Then it arrives at a city sitting in the dust.
Divine judgment notices every detail of iniquity, oppression, and even vanity. All must be brought low.
Another writer calls this the "withering notice of the Judge of all." He shows how personal the inspection is:
Dress, walk, glances — the Spirit of God notices them all.
The verse just before says her men fall by the sword. The women lose the very men they dressed to attract:
But the evil of that day was not limited to the leaders, or to the men of the nation whom verses 2 and 3 describe. The women shared in the guilt. They used every device, well practised among the pagan nations, to make themselves more alluring. And, as the closing verses state, the very men they tried to attract would fall by the sword, and so fail them.
Why a woman sitting on the ground? The loss is a broken relationship, not just a lost war. Older translations render "empty" here as "stripped" or "desolate" — a wife left with nothing. One writer comments on Joel's call to mourn "like a virgin, wearing sackcloth, for the husband of her youth." He links that picture to this verse:
This is a significant expression. It points to Israel in her relationship to Jehovah. It reminds us of Isaiah 3:26 about Jerusalem: "And her gates shall lament and mourn; empty, she shall sit on the ground." It reminds us also of Isaiah 54:6: "For the Lord has called you as a woman forsaken and grieved in spirit, and a wife of youth, when you were refused, says your God."
The next chapter does not leave Zion in the dust:
Everywhere in Scripture this time of tribulation is tied to the Jews in the last days, before their deliverance. After it comes an outshining of beauty and glory, and abundant mercy for the saved and holy remnant... However many the slain, this one Man will repair every breach. In Jerusalem holiness will be real, not just a name.
Later in the book Isaiah returns to the same city and the same marriage picture:
Jerusalem is seen as barren and desolate, after she rejected Him who came to be her husband. But now grace has made Jehovah her righteousness, and He calls her to enlarge the place of her tent... For a little while God treated her as a rejected wife. Now He has comforted her with everlasting mercies.
- Sin first. The desolation is not bad luck or bad politics: "There is no ruin without sin; and here it was frightful and shameless."
- Gates next. The gate was the seat of justice, honour and power; when it mourns, the whole public life of the city has collapsed.
- Details too. Judgment reaches past thrones and armies to vanity. Dress, walk and glances are all under God's eye.
- Emptiness follows. The men whose attention the city dressed for fall by the sword, leaving her with nothing and no one.
- Then comfort. She sits as a rejected wife, but only "for a little while." The same prophet promises everlasting mercies and a Messiah who repairs every breach.
And seven women shall take hold of one man in that day, saying, Our own bread will we eat, and with our own garments will we be clothed; only let us be called by thy name; -- take away our reproach!
This verse closes a long judgment on Jerusalem with its most humiliating stroke: a city with almost no men left. Two questions follow. Is it literal, or a picture of Christ and His people? And why does so dark a line open a chapter about glory?
One writer notes how far down Isaiah's account of the collapse goes.
Isaiah exposes the luxury that ruins a people from the inside, in their own homes. No historian, in the Bible or outside it, has done it so fully or in such fine detail… There is a change, and an exposure that deeply humiliates pride. But there is more. The desolation would be so complete that Isaiah describes the shortage of men as tempting women into a boldness contrary to female modesty.
The women give up food and clothing and ask for the name alone. One writer reads this as pointing on to the end of the age.
The first verse of Isaiah 4 completes this grievous theme, and here we believe we do travel on to the last days. So many men will be destroyed that women themselves will argue for some form of polygamy, to cover the shame of being unmarried. They are ready to be no real cost to the man whose name they take. This may sound strange to us. But Scripture predicts the strife and warfare that will mark the end of the age, so we are not surprised.
To us the last words sound only sad. In Israel they touched something deeper.
The law made a merciful provision that no man's family should be allowed to die out, while a brother survived to continue the line. In Israel, to be childless was a reproach. For a man's name to be blotted out — his family to become extinct — was seen as a special mark of God's displeasure… That provision also seems to recognise the hope in the heart of every Hebrew woman, that through her the promise of "the woman's seed" might somehow be fulfilled.
The picture has tempted some readers to turn it into a symbol. One writer answers them sharply, and adds that their mistake may explain where our chapter break came from.
Serious readers will be surprised to hear of an old idea, held by those who turn everything into symbol, that the "one man" is Christ and the "seven women" believers! Perhaps this absurd result of leaving the plain, real meaning is what led someone to cut the verse off from Isaiah 3 and move it into Isaiah 4, where the Branch follows at once.
Either way, the verse closes a judgment. It does not open a promise.
Judgment is not where the chapter stops.
Scripture everywhere ties this time of tribulation to the Jews in the last days, before their deliverance. Then comes an outshining of beauty and glory, and abundant mercy for the saved and holy remnant… The Branch is a favourite and frequent picture of the Messiah, as any reader of Jeremiah and Zechariah will recognise. He will be there in His beauty and glory, and everything will be in harmony for the escaped of Israel. However many are killed, this one Man will be the restorer of all that was broken.
One writer rules out two wrong ideas about that restoration, and names who it is for.
It is to be a real work of God. No Christian should entertain the idea of a merely outward restoration, or of anything a turn of the political wheel could achieve. But neither is it the result of preaching the gospel as we do now. That nation will once more come into prominence, and in their own land — at least the escaped of Israel. They will be souls blessed by God, but blessed at the same time as the descendants of Jacob on the earth.
- Name sought. Seven women bargain away food and clothing for one thing only: to be called by a man's name, and so lose their reproach.
- Name's weight. In Israel, childlessness and a wiped-out family line marked God's displeasure. The plea is for standing, not comfort.
- Name misread. The one man is not Christ, and the seven women are not believers. That reading leaves the plain sense: a land emptied of men.
- Name's day. Commentators place this scene in the last days, when war has destroyed so many men that women themselves press for such an arrangement.
- Name answered. The very next line names the Branch of the Lord, beautiful and glorious. He is the one Man who restores what judgment broke — not by politics, and not by gospel preaching as now, but by a real work of God for the escaped of Israel.
In that day there shall be a sprout of Jehovah for beauty and glory, and the fruit of the earth for excellency and for ornament for those that are escaped of Israel.
The phrase that opens this verse is not vague. It reaches past Isaiah's own century to the moment when Christ returns.
The words "in that day" open verse 2 as well as verse 1. The "day" in question is plainly the period that introduces the age to come, the time of Christ's second coming. The Old Testament uses the word translated "Branch" of our Lord five times, and it means a sprout — "a Sprout of Jehovah for glory and beauty" (New Trans). Here, though it is veiled, we see a hint of the Deity of the promised Messiah. The picture is of a living tree putting out a sprout that shows the tree's own nature and character. And the living tree here is Jehovah Himself.
Four other passages give Christ the same name, and each stresses something different.
Jeremiah speaks of the Lord Jesus twice as the Branch, or Sprout (Jer. 23:5; Jer. 33:15). There the stress falls on righteousness. It is the character He displays, not the Source He springs from. Zechariah uses the word twice as well (Zech. 3:8; Zech. 6:12). There the stress is different: though He springs from Jehovah, He takes the place of the Servant and enters Manhood to serve. Read the five occurrences in the fuller light of the New Testament, and you see how full these early predictions were about our blessed Lord. The one in our chapter is the first and deepest of them all.
Taken together, these passages describe a reign still ahead — the millennium, when Christ rules on earth.
A title of the Lord Jesus, which He will bear in connection with Israel in the future… He will be a "righteous Branch and a King." He will "build [or advance in honour] the temple of Jehovah; and He shall bear the glory, and shall sit and rule on His throne; and He shall be a priest on His throne: and the counsel of peace shall be between them both." It is a description of the Lord Jesus in the millennium.
The same prophet also said Israel would see nothing in Him to desire.
When the Lord came the first time, the nation rejected Him. The prophet foresaw this in Isaiah 53. God's tender plant, the root out of dry ground, held no attraction for the people He came to. As Isaiah wrote, He had "no form or majesty that we should look at Him, and no beauty that we should desire Him" (Isa. 53:2). It will be completely different when the Lord returns in His glory to save the godly remnant from the dreadful conflicts of the last days. They will truly see the excellence and beauty of the One whom the leaders and nation of Israel once rejected and crucified.
The glory of verse 2 follows a period of slaughter, and the survivors are what is left of a nation under judgment.
Scripture everywhere ties this time of tribulation to the Jews in the last days, before God delivers them. After it comes an outshining of beauty and glory, and abundant mercy for the saved and holy remnant… The Branch is a familiar picture of the Messiah. He will be there in His beauty and glory, and everything will be in harmony for the escaped of Israel. However many are slain, this one Man will repair every breach. Holiness in Jerusalem will be a reality, not a mere name. Yet this does not come by the gospel of grace as now. It comes, in the prophet's own words, "by a spirit of judgment and by a spirit of burning."
Kelly rules out two popular explanations of how this blessing comes.
It is to be a real work of God. No Christian should entertain the idea of a merely worldly restoration, or of anything that political upheaval could achieve. Nor, on the other hand, is it the effect of preaching the gospel as now. "That nation" will once more come into prominence, and in their own land — at least the escaped of Israel. These will be souls blessed by God, but blessed at the same time as the seed of Jacob on the earth.
The second half of the verse describes what the Branch yields, and for whom.
The Lord Jesus as the BRANCH will give infinite delight to God, just as He brought unbroken pleasure to His Father when He was here as the TRUE VINE. For men there will be peace and joy — the fruit of His work on the cross, flowing from His good and generous reign.
- Day. "In that day" is not Isaiah's day or ours. It is the period that opens the age to come, when Christ returns.
- Sprout. "Branch" means a sprout, and the tree it grows from is Jehovah Himself. That is a veiled hint of Messiah's Deity, and the first and deepest of the five Branch passages.
- Beauty. At His first coming Israel saw no beauty in Him to desire. At His return the rescued remnant will see the excellence of the One they crucified.
- Escaped. The blessing reaches only those left after judgment. It comes by a spirit of judgment and burning — a real work of God, not political change and not gospel preaching as now.
- Fruit. The Branch delights God as the true Vine once did. For men He yields peace and joy, flowing from His work on the cross and His reign.
And it shall come to pass that he who remaineth in Zion, and he that is left in Jerusalem, shall be called holy, -- every one that is written among the living in Jerusalem;
Isaiah 4 ends a long stretch of warning with a promise. After the fire, the people left in Zion will be called holy, and God will have their names recorded — which raises three questions: who survives, what that record means, and how such holiness is produced.
The verse speaks of those who are left and who remain. That wording assumes many were not. Writers tie those who escape to a coming time of trouble centred on Judah.
In that day Christ will be revealed, and a godly remnant will be there too, spoken of as those of Israel who have escaped. This shows how fierce and destructive of life the great tribulation foretold elsewhere will be. Verse 3 makes the same point. From our Lord's prophetic discourse, recorded in three of the Gospels, we learn that Judah and Jerusalem will be the very centre of that time of trial and persecution. It will only end when the Lord intervenes in power at His second coming. Those who remain will be alive spiritually and holy, and will enjoy the excellent fruits produced by His presence.
The verse ends with names recorded for life. Commentators count more than one such record in Scripture.
A registry of people's names as living. One (also simply called God's book) may be a book of those who only have a name to live, and God may therefore blot out their names: Exodus 32:32-33; Revelation 3:5. Another is a book of the saved, and no one will be erased from it: Philippians 4:3; Revelation 20:12, 15; Revelation 21:27. A third, called simply "the book," contains the names of the remnant of Israel: Daniel 12:1.
Being on that list means more than surviving as a nation. Those who come through are changed people.
Whether they are in the land, or come out of the dust of the earth, or come from among the Gentiles, God will deliver none but those who are the objects of His counsels — those "found written in the book." Some of them may awake, as the figure puts it, to take part in the great struggle at the close. But their names are not registered in God's book, so they will be given up to shame and everlasting contempt. For the rest it is not a mere national deliverance, but much more. Those who are delivered will be truly born of God. A spiritual character will attach to their rise, as well as a national one.
Isaiah promises a Jerusalem where holiness is fact and not just a name. The next verse names the means.
However many the slain, this one Man will be the restorer of all breaches, and holiness will be a reality, and not a mere name, in Jerusalem. Yet it is not by the gospel of grace as now, but "by a spirit of judgment and by a spirit of burning." It is not the church but Israel that is in question here, and her purification by judgment. Then the Lord's open presence will be her security as much as her glory.
Another writer puts the same result in a phrase drawn from Israel's own history: what the nation was always meant to be, it will at last be.
The separation is dwelt on in the next verse, and in plain words, Israel becomes what it never yet has been, an "assembly of the righteous."
The holiness of verse 3 rests on the washing described in verse 4. That washing is not the work of evangelism but of fire.
Before this happy state of things can come, there must be the work of cleansing that verse 4 speaks of. It is "a spirit of judgment and a spirit of burning" — that is, fire. We may remember that John the Baptist said of our Lord, "He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire" (Matthew 3:11). He also showed that the fire burns the chaff, while the wheat goes into His barn. Burning the chaff will purge and wash away the filth. God will cleanse Jerusalem, indeed the whole earth, by a work of judgment and not by the preaching of grace.
Has any of this happened already? One writer answers from what the chapter says next.
There is no room to say that this was fulfilled at any time in their past history. The prophet goes straight on to what is still future.
Why tell Israel this so long in advance?
We see in Isaiah 4:3 that all who escape in Jerusalem will be written to life... Prophecy always assumes a state of displeasure on God's part, but blessing and glory after judgment. God gave it to be believed and understood before it happened. If someone only understands it once it has happened, the moral effect is lost. When God makes His mind known to us about what does not touch us directly, we have great proof of His love and enjoy communion with Him. That communion always separates us more from a world about to be judged.
- Fire first. Verse 3's blessing rests on verse 4's washing. God cleanses Jerusalem by judgment and burning, not by the preaching of grace.
- A remnant, not a nation. Those left are the ones who escape. The wording shows how destructive that tribulation centred on Judah will be.
- A name on a list. Names recorded for life point to a register God keeps. Commentators link it to "the book" of Daniel 12:1, holding the names of Israel's remnant.
- Born, not just spared. Deliverance for those in the book is more than national rescue. They will be truly born of God, with a spiritual character to match.
- Holy in fact. Holiness in Jerusalem stops being a name and becomes real — and God says so in advance, so faith can hold it before the day comes.
when the Lord shall have washed away the filth of the daughters of Zion, and shall have scoured out the blood of Jerusalem from its midst, by the spirit of judgment, and by the spirit of burning.
The chapter turns from Jerusalem's ruin to Jerusalem's restoration. Verse 4 is the hinge: the city is not repaired but cleansed, and the cleansing sounds nothing like mercy. Two questions press: what exactly is being washed away, and whose "spirit" does the burning?
Verse 4 names what must happen before the good things of verses 2 and 3 can come. One writer sets that work against the way God works now:
But this happy state of things cannot come before the work of cleansing that verse 4 speaks of. Verse 4 describes it as "a spirit of judgment and by the spirit of burning" — that is, by fire. We may remember that John the Baptist said of our Lord, "He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire" (Matt. 3:11). He also showed that the fire would burn the chaff, while He gathered the wheat into His barn. In our chapter, verses 2 and 3 describe the wheat. The burning of the chaff will purge and wash away the filth. The cleansing of Jerusalem, indeed of the whole earth, will be by a work of judgment and not by the preaching of grace.
Verse 3 calls the survivors in Zion holy. That holiness is no mere title — verse 4 says what makes it real.
He will be there in His beauty and glory, and all will be in unison for the escaped of Israel. No matter how many are killed, this one Man will repair every breach. Holiness will be real in Jerusalem, not just a name. Yet this does not come by the gospel of grace as it does now, but expressly "by the spirit of judgment and by the spirit of burning." … It is not the church but Israel that is in question, and her purification by judgment. Then the manifested presence of the Lord will follow, and will be her security as well as her glory.
Commentators differ over the words "a spirit of judgment"; the older wording behind these quotes reads "the spirit of judgment." Some apply it to the Holy Spirit guiding church leaders. Kelly rejects that, but still holds that the Spirit is meant:
Vitringa applied the spirit of judgment and the spirit of destruction to the Holy Spirit guiding the ruler and ministers of the church in discernment. That is the old source of endless error — it turns Jewish scripture aside to a Christian purpose. This is plainly the day of righteous judgment on earth, above all in its chief city, Jerusalem. Yet the action of the Spirit is certainly meant here, but in judicial power. First comes purity, then glory shines brightly on Zion.
The same Spirit works in grace across the world today. Here He works in one place, and in a different character:
He does not come as the Spirit of grace in an arena as wide as the world. He comes in Israel, especially in Jerusalem, as the Spirit of judgment (Isa. 4:4).
The burning is not the end in itself. One writer illustrates it from an ordinary sight in the street:
I was watching a man painting a gate. He had a lamp with the flame directed forward. He held this against the old, dirty paint, scorching and blistering it. Then with the sharp edge of a tool he scraped it off. All this had a final purpose in view. He was preparing the gate, by flame and burning, for the new paint. … In the same way the Spirit of judgment will work by "burning," removing all that is evil. This prepares the way for the Kingdom of Christ to be set up in glory.
Read with the chapters before it, verse 4 shows God dealing with a specific people in a specific place:
In these four chapters one can see the importance God attaches to the land. He takes account of the iniquity of His earthly people, cleansing them by His judgment. He washes away the filth of the nations also.
One writer sees the Spirit pictured together with the fire of judgment, and draws a warning for today:
Here, surely, we have a symbolic picture of the Spirit of God in His fullness. But the picture ties Him to the fire of judgment. That reminds us that, as with Israel so with the world, God is going to purge away all filth "by the spirit of judgment, and by the spirit of burning" (Isa. 4:4). Some today refuse the One who speaks in grace from heaven. In the day to come they will find that "our God is a consuming fire" (Heb. 12:29).
- Filth — the verse names two stains: the filth of the daughters of Zion and the blood of Jerusalem. God washes both away.
- Fire — the cleansing comes by burning, not by preaching. The fire takes the chaff so the wheat can remain.
- Spirit — the Spirit is at work, but in judicial power, not as the Spirit of grace He is across the world today.
- Glory — the burning prepares the surface. Purity comes first, and only then does glory shine on Zion.
- Today — grace speaks from heaven now. Those who refuse it will meet the same God later as a consuming fire.
And Jehovah will create over every dwelling-place of mount Zion, and over its convocations, a cloud by day and a smoke, and the brightness of a flame of fire by night for over all the glory shall be a covering.
Isaiah 4 closes three chapters that expose the rot in Jerusalem. Now the same city has a cloud over it by day and fire by night — the signs that marked God's presence over Israel in the desert. When does this happen? Who is it for? And how is a cover of smoke and flame good news?
The order in the chapter matters. Verse 4 speaks of filth washed away and bloodguilt purged; only then does the cloud appear. One writer places all this in the day of God's judgment on the earth, and ties the image back to the desert:
This is clearly the day of righteous judgment on earth, and above all in its capital city, Jerusalem... God first makes Zion pure, and then glory shines brightly on her. Just as the cloudy pillar once covered the tabernacle of God's presence, so Jehovah will now create that same cloud and fire over every dwelling-place of Mount Zion, and over her assemblies.
The cloud is not a picture of an inward mood. It is something people can see, and it lasts:
It will be a visible glory. It will be a permanent glory. He will now dwell gloriously among the children of Israel. People will see this glory over Jerusalem, as they did long ago — a cloud by day, and a shining, flaming fire by night.
Solomon's temple held the glory in a single place. Isaiah spreads it over every house and every gathering in the city:
Once judgment has done its cleansing work, God's presence can return to Jerusalem. It will not rest on one special building, like the temple in Solomon's day, but on every dwelling-place and convocation.
The word behind "assemblies" is not vague. It is the same Hebrew word used for Israel's appointed sacred gatherings:
It means "a calling together," and it is always called "holy." Leviticus 23 lists the occasions called "holy convocations," in the chapter that records the Feasts. They included the Sabbath and ended with the Feast of Tabernacles. The same Hebrew word is translated "assemblies" in Isaiah 1:13 and Isaiah 4:5.
Here fire and smoke form a roof. The next verse fills out the picture: shade from heat, cover from storm. One writer draws the wilderness parallel, and its scale:
Long ago God spread His tabernacle over the tent of meeting. That tent then became the centre and resting place of the thousands of Israel. It covered them in the desert. The huge canopy God spread over them sheltered two and a half million people — the redeemed host of Jehovah pictured in type — from scorching sun and winter storms. It was the nation's glory and defence. In the eternal state the tabernacle of God is with men (Revelation 21:3); in the days of Christ's coming reign God's tabernacle will be over them (Revelation 7:15). What security that white-robed crowd will enjoy as they rest under the glorious canopy spread over them, each one equally sheltered!
A cloud is a strange defence — until you ask who is inside it. One writer answers with a question:
When that happens, who will be able to strike a blow at Jerusalem? The presence of God and the glory that comes with it will be protection. Who can strike through a defence like that?
Some read this as a picture of the church, or of heaven. One writer rejects that on the strength of the imagery itself:
Clearly the images used do not fit heaven. They fit the earth, and above all the land and people of Israel. So this is not about eternity, when all distinctions of land and race have passed away. It is also wide of the mark to treat the history of the early church as the fulfilment of this prophecy. It is really a vision of future divine glory for Israel on the earth, after judgments, under the Messiah.
Commentators differ in how far they press the verse into present use. Kelly warns against turning Israel's promise into a church promise. Another writer still finds a picture for believers today: rest in Christ, "whose glory God spreads as a covering over His redeemed" (Samuel Ridout).
- Purged — glory does not settle on a filthy city. Judgment cleanses first; the cloud follows.
- Created — no human effort produces this glory. God creates it, visible and permanent.
- Spread — it does not settle on one sacred building but reaches every home and every gathering in Zion.
- Canopy — the glory is also a roof. It shelters from heat and storm, as the desert cloud sheltered Israel.
- Safe — because the defence is God's own presence, no blow can get through it.
And there shall be a tabernacle for shade by day from the heat, and for a shelter and for a covert from storm and from rain.
Isaiah's fourth chapter ends not with a throne but with a shelter — a small booth against heat and storm. What is this covering, who sits under it, and when?
The shelter is not offered to Jerusalem as she stands. It follows the cleansing described just before, and one commentator insists on that order:
It is clearly the day of righteous judgment on earth, and especially in its chief city, Jerusalem. No one denies for a moment that the Spirit acts here, but He acts in judicial power. First purity is brought about, then glory shines brightly on Zion.
Another writer sees Isaiah's opening chapters moving toward this close:
There will be a display of glory in this world, as in a small measure there was in the wilderness… Here we have the judgment of Israel and the glory displayed. The first four chapters give us the end of everything as far as Israel is concerned — but glory at last.
The English word "tabernacle" covers two different words in the original, and the difference matters:
The word translated "tabernacle" in verse 6 is not the one used for the tabernacle in the wilderness, but the one used for the feast of tabernacles, or booths. Any extreme, either of heat or of rain, will be so slight that nothing more than a booth will be needed. Everything necessary will come with the presence of God among His people, redeemed by judgment.
That feast itself points forward:
A foreshadowing of the rest that remains, and of the rejoicing that will take place when all their earthly troubles are ended, and Messiah is reigning over them.
Verse 6 tells us what the covering over Zion is. It is God's own presence, no longer tied to one building:
Once judgment has done its cleansing work, God's presence can return to Jerusalem. It will rest not merely on a special building, like the temple in Solomon's day, but on every dwelling place and gathering. As of old, a cloud in the daytime and a flame by night will mark His presence. When that happens, who will be able to strike a blow at Jerusalem? The presence of God and the glory that goes with it will be the protection. Who can strike through a defence like that?
Some read this verse as a picture of the church, or of the eternal state. One commentator answers that reading directly:
Clearly the images used do not suit heaven but the earth, especially the land and people of Israel. This again shows that eternity is not in question here, for in eternity all distinctions of land and race have passed away… It is really a vision of future divine glory for Israel on the earth, after judgments, under the Messiah.
One writer traces the same covering from Israel's desert camp to two future scenes:
God spread His tabernacle over the tent of meeting long ago, which became the centre and rest of the thousands of Israel. It covered them in the desert. The huge canopy God spread over them sheltered them from scorching suns and winter blasts. It was the nation's glory and defence… In the eternal state the tabernacle of God is with men (Rev. 21:3); in millennial times God's tabernacle will be over them (Rev. 7:15). What a sense of security the white-robed crowd will enjoy as they rest under that glorious canopy — each one equally sheltered, equally protected!
- Cleansed — God never offers the booth to a guilty city. Judgment purifies first, then the glory shines.
- Covered — the canopy is God's own presence. It rests on every home and gathering, not on one temple, and no blow can get through.
- Sheltered — the word means "booth," the light hut of the harvest feast. Heat and rain will be so slight that a booth is enough.
- Located — the promise belongs to the earth, to the land and people of Israel, not to the church and not to eternity.
- Coming — the same canopy covers the crowd in Revelation. It is how Isaiah's first four chapters end: judgment throughout, but glory at last.
I will sing to my well-beloved a song of my beloved touching his vineyard My well-beloved had a vineyard upon a fruitful hill.
Isaiah 5 opens with a song about a vineyard planted on the best possible ground. The gentle start hides a courtroom: before the chapter ends, God will ask the hearers to judge between Himself and His vineyard.
Isaiah's song is not the first song sung to Israel.
In Isaiah 5 the prophet sings a song of Jehovah, his well beloved, about His vineyard. Moses had already (Deut. 32) spoken a song in the ears of Israel. In magnificent language it celebrates the sovereign choice and blessing of God, the sins and punishment of the people, and also His final mercy to His land and people... Our chapter takes in a narrower field of view.
God's aim is to make the people stop and look at themselves.
God calls His people to consider their state. He would reveal His judgments to them, but He begins by making them pay attention... It is the complaint of God as He reminds His people of what He has done for them.
Two words of affection appear in this one verse, and commentators differ over whom they point to.
Two terms of affection open Jehovah's song about His vineyard: "My wellbeloved" and "My beloved." There seems to be prophetic reference in them to the love within the Godhead... Jehovah sings the song (Isa. 5:1), and the vineyard, the house of Israel, belongs to Him (Isa. 5:7), and to His beloved also (Isa. 5:1). The title "wellbeloved" (y'deed) points to the Messiah. It stands inside Jehovah's name for Solomon (Jedidiah), the "beloved of his God" (2 Sam. 12:25; Neh. 13:26). Solomon is a picture of Him who was the true Heir of Jehovah's vineyard (Mark 12:6, 7).
The same title reappears when Jesus tells His own version of this story, which is why some see the deity of Christ shining through here.
In Isaiah 5 the wellbeloved is very clearly Jehovah; it is His vineyard. In the parable in Mark's gospel the one sent by the householder into the vineyard is his wellbeloved son. There is a remarkable testimony to the deity of Christ here. It has often been said that the Jehovah of the Old Testament is the Jesus of the New.
The song is not left as a riddle. Isaiah supplies the answer himself a few lines later.
The key to the interpretation of the song is found in verse 7, "For the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah His pleasant plant."
The "very fertile hill" is the whole point of the picture. God chose the site and supplied every advantage.
There was no failure on God's part. He had established Israel in the most favourable position and separated them to Himself. He removed stumbling-blocks, crowned them with favours, and granted not only protection but every means of blessing. "And now, inhabitants of Jerusalem, and men of Judah, judge, I pray you, between me and my vineyard. What could have been done more to my vineyard that I have not done in it?"... Yet all was in vain. The result was only bad fruit.
The vine was a pointed choice of plant, since it exists for one purpose only.
They go back to the deliverance out of Egypt, in which He had separated them to Himself for fruit. The vine is good for nothing else but fruit, and with its trailing branches is the very image of dependence.
The complaint was aimed at one nation, but the standard it uses is not limited to them.
This applies to our consciences. God has a right to look for fruit in proportion to the pains He took, and if there were none, judgment must follow. God never stops at what is spoiled to patch up the gaps. He looks at what He did at the beginning, and compares it with the present state. That is why the Lord says to the angel of the church in Ephesus, "You have abandoned the love you had at first."
The ruined vineyard is not God's last word about it.
Then at last Israel will be no longer a fruitless vine but rather "A vineyard of red wine." Then peace will follow. Israel will be like a tree full of blossom, and will fill the face of the world with fruit. Israel will become what God from the outset intended them to be. This will never come about as the result of their efforts.
- Sung — Isaiah delivers judgment as a love song. God wants attention first, then conscience.
- Beloved — commentators differ over the words of affection in verse 1: some hear the Lord Himself, others the Messiah, the true Heir of the vineyard.
- Vineyard — verse 7 unlocks the song. The vineyard is the house of Israel, and Judah His choice planting.
- Fertile — the hill, the clearing, the choicest vine: God's side of the case is flawless, so the failure can only be on ours.
- Fruit — a vine exists for fruit alone. God measures us by what He gave at the beginning, and He will yet make His vineyard bear fruit.
And he dug it, and gathered out the stones thereof, and planted it with the choicest vine; and he built a tower in the midst of it, and also hewed out a winepress therein; and he looked that it should bring forth grapes, but it brought forth wild grapes.
This song opens as a love song about a well-tended vineyard. By verse 7 the vineyard turns out to be God's own people. Verse 2 holds the shock. After every possible care, the harvest was worthless. So what fruit was God looking for, and what happens when it never comes?
The verse piles up work: digging, clearing, planting, building, hewing. One writer reads that list as God's full answer to any charge against Him.
There was no failure on God's part. He had established Israel in the most favourable position. He separated them to Himself, removed obstacles, and crowned them with favours. He gave them not only protection but every means of blessing.
Each item in the vineyard stands for something God gave Israel. One writer takes the fence as the law, and the "choicest vine" as the nation's ancestry.
The law, given through Moses, fenced them in. It was there to protect them from outside contamination, if they kept it. What is more, they were a "choicest vine," for they had descended from Abraham, one of God's choicest saints.
Another writer gives each part its own sense: the tower watches, and the winepress receives what the vineyard owes its owner.
The hedge speaks of her separation from the nations. The place for the winepress tells of the provision God had made, so that Israel could give Him some return for His great goodness. The tower shows watchfulness against evil getting in.
Verse 7 names the fruit God had been waiting for. It was not religious performance.
There was a result, but it was completely worthless and evil. Where there should have been justice, there was oppression; where there should have been righteousness, only a cry of distress. Again we must notice this: the charge against them is moral corruption, not a failure to keep religious ceremonies.
(Verse 7 in the ESV: "he looked for justice, but behold, bloodshed; for righteousness, but behold, an outcry!")
The failure was not one bad season. Israel was the test case, farmed under ideal conditions. The sour fruit exposed the vine itself.
But it was a natural vine. It was only the vine of earth, given every chance to show what fruit it could produce. Israel was the best nation on earth. So we, and all humanity, are under review.
Kelly traces the failure back to Adam:
They, like Adam, broke the covenant. It was the old story over again. Human responsibility ends in total ruin.
Jesus later called Himself the vine. One writer sets the two pictures side by side.
In Isaiah the reason for the desolation is made plain. Israel as the vine brought forth nothing but wild and worthless grapes. There was no fruit for God. Jesus Himself was the Branch made strong for Jehovah, and He now presents Himself as the real Source of all fruit for God on the earth.
God does not begin His case by listing sins. He begins by recalling what He planted — and that method is not limited to Israel.
God has a right to look for fruit, in keeping with the trouble He took. If there is none, judgment must follow. God never stops at what is spoilt in order to repair the damage. He looks at what He did at the beginning, and compares it with the present state. That is why the Lord says to the angel of the church in Ephesus, "You have abandoned the love you had at first." What God asks of us is this. We must look at what He did at the beginning. Then we compare ourselves with the fruits and testimonies given at the start, not with the spoilt state we are in now.
- Planted. God chose the best site, the best stock, and every protection. Israel stood in "the most favourable position," so the blame cannot fall on the Planter.
- Equipped. Fence, tower and winepress each meant something: separation from the nations, watch against evil, and a place to give God His return.
- Expected. The grapes He wanted were justice and righteousness. The charge is moral, not ceremonial: oppression grew where justice should have.
- Exposed. Perfect conditions still produced wild fruit. That exposed the vine itself. It is Adam's story again: human responsibility ending in ruin.
- Replaced. Christ, the Branch God made strong for Himself, steps in as the true Vine. He is now the only source of fruit for God on earth, and God still asks us to compare ourselves with the fruit He looked for at the start.
And now, inhabitants of Jerusalem and men of Judah, judge, I pray you, between me and my vineyard.
God breaks off the song and turns to His hearers. He asks Jerusalem and Judah to settle the case between Himself and His vineyard. The jury He calls is the vineyard on trial.
One writer names the "Well-beloved" of the song and states what God is asking:
The "Well-beloved" is the Lord Jesus. God asks people to judge between Him and His vineyard — even the inhabitants of Jerusalem and the men of Judah. He has done much for a nation that had a certain responsibility on the earth. He will carry out all His purposes, but first He tests Israel to see whether they will fulfil God's design themselves.
The appeal is not made to neutral outsiders. Those invited to weigh the evidence are themselves the plants that failed:
So the nation as a whole is weighed in the divine balances, and found wanting. The case is so plain and so serious that God challenges the men of Judah to judge between Him and His vineyard. Yet they themselves are the degenerate trees in question. The goodness shown to Israel was beyond doubt. So was their obligation to yield fruit for God. But obligation produces no fruit fit for Him.
In older translations the appeal reads "judge, I pray you" — a plea, not just a summons. A writer lists what God had given and hears that same tone:
He had blessed them with every earthly blessing in a pleasant land. The Lord set them apart for Himself, surrounded them with His favours, and gave them His law... Nothing was lacking on God's part. But the nation, as a whole, had turned away from Him, broken the covenant, and corrupted their ways entirely. And now Jehovah appeals to the inhabitants of Jerusalem and the men of Judah. His appeal is full of the most melting grace and tenderness.
The failure was not Israel's alone. One writer traces it back to Adam:
There was no failure on God's part... Yet it was all in vain. The result was only bad fruit... They, like Adam, broke the covenant. It was the old story over again. Human responsibility ends in total ruin.
The Lord Jesus later took up the same picture, and the story He told ran darker than the prophet's:
He has to portray His own death as man's answer to God. God had lavished favours and blessings on man since the day he fell in Eden, and this was the answer He got. He has to speak of how God patiently sent one servant after another, and how the tenants treated them all the same way. God had tried every possible means to get fruit from the vineyard, but all in vain. Only one hope remained. "They will respect my son."
The appeal is not locked in ancient history. One writer turns it on us:
God has a right to look for fruit in keeping with the trouble He took. If there was none, judgment must follow. God never stops at what is spoiled to patch up the gaps. He looks at what He did at the beginning, and compares it with the present state... What God asks of us is that we look at what He did at the beginning. We must compare ourselves, not with the spoiled present state, but with the fruits and testimonies given at the start. If we do not bear these fruits, we are guilty, and here is the consequence: "Judge between me and my vineyard." The principle of verses 3 and 4 applies also to the church.
That leaves a warning for anyone who still hopes to meet God on his own record:
He had planted a hedge, and He required fruit. He was fully entitled to require fruit... But when He looked for grapes, it brought forth wild grapes. He has tried requiring fruit, but man has not produced it. He has found too much bad fruit to require it again. Do not then pretend to uphold the claims of God; if you do, you must satisfy them.
- Owner. The vineyard belongs to the Well-beloved. God asks Jerusalem and Judah to settle the case.
- Gift. Nothing was lacking on God's part: a chosen place, His law, His favours, every means of blessing.
- Jury. The judges He calls are the failing plants themselves. Their verdict condemns them.
- Fruit. Obligation never produced fruit fit for God. Responsibility left with man ends in ruin, and man's answer to God was the death of His Son.
- Mirror. God still measures us by what He gave at the beginning, not by the spoiled present state.
What was there yet to do to my vineyard that I have not done in it? Wherefore, when I looked that it should bring forth grapes, brought it forth wild grapes? --
The picture is a vineyard: God planted the choicest vine, cared for it, and got only wild grapes. In verse 4 He turns to the people of Jerusalem and Judah and asks them who is to blame.
God is not asking for information. He is making a legal appeal — and He asks the accused to give the verdict.
God weighs the whole nation in His scales and finds it wanting. The case is so plain and so serious that He challenges the men of Judah to judge between Him and His vineyard — though they themselves are the degenerate trees in question. God's goodness to Israel was beyond doubt. So was their duty to bear fruit for God.
The question rests on the record of the earlier verses. God gave the vineyard every advantage.
There was no failure on God's part. He had put Israel in the best possible position. He set them apart for Himself, cleared away obstacles, and crowned them with favours. He gave them not only protection but every means of blessing… Yet it was all in vain. The result was only bad fruit… They, like Adam, transgressed the covenant. It was the old story over again. Human responsibility ends in total ruin.
Isaiah does not leave us guessing what the grapes stood for. The song names the fruit God wanted.
In the vineyard God had planted the choicest vine. He had done everything to get fruit. He put a winepress there so that it would bring forth grapes — and it brought forth wild grapes. There was no fruit for God! The passage shows the fruit God sought: "He looked for justice, but behold, bloodshed; for righteousness, but behold, an outcry!"
(Older translations read "judgment… oppression" where the ESV has "justice… bloodshed.")
The vineyard was one nation, but the test was wider. God fenced off one plot to test the soil of the whole field.
We must also remember that Israel was representative of the whole human family. God took a vine out of Egypt and planted it on a fruitful hill. He put a hedge around it and worked it with all the skill of a divine gardener. He asks, "What more was there to do for My vineyard, that I have not done in it?" But it was a natural vine. It was only the vine of earth, given every chance to show what fruit it could produce.
God measures the present against the beginning. He uses the same test later with a church.
God has a right to look for fruit in keeping with the pains He took. If there were none, judgment had to follow. God never stops at what is spoiled to patch up the gaps. He looks at what He did at the beginning and compares it with the present state. This is why the Lord says to the angel of the church in Ephesus, "You have abandoned the love you had at first." God asks us to look at what He did at the beginning. We must compare ourselves, not with the present spoiled state, but with the fruits and testimony given at the start.
God's answer came centuries later. He made one last trial of man.
The world is a moral wilderness. Into it, and into that little plot on which He had lavished such care, came His final trial of man! "I have one Son, it may be they will respect him when they see him." The story is soon told. They gave Him a cross when He came looking for a crown! They gave Him spitting when He came looking for fruit! And so ended the four thousand years of testing under every form of trial. Man cannot now say that God left one single method untried; he is without excuse.
The failure of the old vine is what makes Jesus' claim so striking.
Isaiah makes the reason for the desolation plain. Israel as the vine brought forth nothing but wild and worthless grapes. There was no fruit for God. Jesus Himself was the Branch made strong for the Lord. He now presents Himself as the real Source of all fruit for God on the earth.
- Care — God gave every advantage: the choicest vine, the hedge, the winepress, every means of blessing. The failure was not His.
- Claim — Care creates a claim. God had a right to look for fruit matching the pains He took, and the fruit He named was justice and righteousness.
- Court — The guilty are asked to give the verdict. Judah must judge its own case, and by answering, condemn itself.
- Cross — God's last trial of man was to send His Son. They gave Him a cross when He came looking for a crown, and man is left without excuse.
- Christ — The vine of earth gave God nothing. All fruit for God on the earth now comes from Christ Himself.
And now, let me tell you what I am about to do to my vineyard I will take away its hedge, and it shall be eaten up; I will break down its wall, and it shall be trodden under foot;
The song has turned into a courtroom scene. God has shown what He did for His vineyard, asked Judah for the verdict, and now He passes sentence: He will take away the protections He Himself put there.
One writer sets God's care for Israel beside the nation's answer to it.
This was God's tender care of Israel. He blessed them with every earthly blessing in a pleasant land. The Lord set them apart for Himself, surrounded them with His favours, and gave them His law... Nothing was lacking on God's part. But the nation, as a whole, had turned away from Him, broken the covenant, and completely corrupted their ways... Under the law there was no fruit fit for God. With man on the ground of responsibility there is nothing but failure, and since law must take its course, judgment follows.
The hedge, the tower and the winepress each stood for something. One writer reads them back to their meaning for Israel.
Isaiah 5:1-7 gives a clear explanation of the vineyard a man planted: "the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the whole house of Israel" (v.7). The hedge speaks of her separation from the nations. The place for the winepress tells of the provision God had made, so that Israel might give Him back some return for His great goodness. The tower shows watchfulness against evil getting in.
So removing the hedge ends Israel's separation from the nations. God lifts what kept them out, and the vineyard lies open.
The most striking thing in the verse is who does the demolishing. The One who planted, fenced and built the tower is the One who breaks the fence.
But man always fails in what God expects from him, and He would have it seen what man is. God does all that man could ask, and this only shows man's ill will. Sacrifices, temple, service — God had arranged all. The people fail in all; and God destroys what He had Himself made. He breaks the fence... God entrusted man with true privileges; but man fails: God takes all away, and the result is a judgment.
The same writer adds that when people are far from God, "they cling to religious forms; it is the sign that all is going to ruin." Forms matter more to people as God matters less to the conscience.
The threat was not poetry only. Once the fence was down, real invaders came in, and one writer follows the fulfilment step by step.
And so the Lord permitted the "wild boar out of the wood" to waste it. He also says, "I will take away the hedge of it"; "I will lay it waste"; and "I will command the clouds that they rain no rain upon it." It bore fruit only in sin and was false to the Lord... So the Lord gave him up to the Gentile king Nebuchadnezzar, to rule over him. He commanded him to accept this punishment as coming from the Lord.
Setting a nation aside is not the same as abandoning it. One writer separates Israel's public role from the question of whether people are saved.
Israel, as a vessel to bear God's name to the world, was set aside; but this did not touch the question of God's faithfulness. He will restore Israel in the last days... The question here is not the certainty of individual salvation, but about the vessel God is using to bear His name before the world. People who believe will go to heaven, but the vessel of testimony, having failed, must be broken.
The verse is not locked in the past. The same principle reaches those who now hold the privileges Judah once held.
Judah was the plant of Jehovah's pleasure, but it brought forth wild grapes. God judges the vineyard, and Christendom as well. We have enjoyed greater advantages. Our Christian responsibility is greater, so our judgment will be greater too. God enters into details to show the righteousness of His judgments.
- Planted — God gave Israel a fenced place, choice vines, a tower and a winepress. The hedge marked her off from the nations; the tower watched against evil.
- Provoked — nothing was lacking on God's side. The nation failed, as man under responsibility always does.
- Pulled down — the Planter Himself breaks the fence. He takes away what He had given, and the loss of protection is the judgment.
- Plundered — with the hedge gone, the wild boar came in, and God handed Judah over to Nebuchadnezzar.
- Preserved — the vessel of testimony breaks, but God's faithfulness holds. He will restore Israel in the last days, and He warns those who now hold her privileges: greater advantage means greater judgment.
and I will make it a waste -- it shall not be pruned nor cultivated, but there shall come up briars and thorns; and I will command the clouds that they rain no rain upon it.
The song about the vineyard ends with the owner's decision: He will stop working it. The threat is not a storm or an invading army. It is withdrawal — no pruning, no hoeing, no rain. What happens when God stops tending what He planted?
The sentence in verse 6 follows a case God has already made.
There was no failure on God's part. He had established Israel in the most favourable position. He separated them to Himself, removed obstacles, and crowned them with favours. He granted not only protection but every means of blessing... Yet it was all in vain. The result was only bad fruit... They, like Adam, transgressed the covenant. It was the old story over again. Human responsibility ends in total ruin.
What fruit had He looked for, and why did heaven close? Commentators answer from Judah's own record:
The wild grapes were the product of their corrupt nature. They were the oppression and unrighteousness that raised a cry to God, instead of the praise, thanksgiving and worship the Lord looked for. Moreover, the history of Judah, like the history of the ten tribes, was one of idolatry... No wonder God threatened to leave the land to "briers and thorns," and to "command the clouds that they rain no rain upon it."
The one who ruins the vineyard is its owner. Everything He set up for His people, He takes down Himself.
But man always fails in what God expects from him, and God wants it seen what man is. God does all that man could ask, and this only shows the ill-will of man. Sacrifices, temple, service — God had arranged it all. The people fail in all of it; and God destroys what He had Himself made. He breaks the fence... God entrusted true privileges to man; but man fails: God takes it all away, and the result is judgment.
Left alone, the ground does not stay neutral. What grows there points back to Eden, and forward to the day the curse ends.
It shows how many the fruits are of the curse pronounced in Eden because of the sin of man. But that curse will be removed in the millennium, when the myrtle and such trees will take their place.
The ruin has two sides: the ground runs wild, and the sky shuts. No farmer can order the clouds; only God can. Commentators trace how that rain later failed:
First the land had to lose its people, and second it had to become barren and sterile. Titus scattered the Jews, and that brought the first. God withheld the latter rain, and that brought the second. The rain failed in May, when the land needed it most. The effects were so serious that the country turned sterile and barren, and became overrun with thorns.
The same principle reaches past Judah. Where God gives more, He asks more:
Judah was the plant of Jehovah's pleasure, but it brought forth wild grapes. God judges the vineyard, and He also judges Christendom. We have enjoyed greater advantages. Our responsibility as Christians is greater, so the judgment will be greater too. God enters into details to show the righteousness of His judgments.
The same closed heaven can settle over one life, not just a nation:
Can we not see a fitting and striking picture here? The barren land and the desolate wilderness show a soul out of communion, a soul that has disobeyed the precious commandments of Christ. Such a person has no refreshing communications with heaven. No showers come down. There are no unfoldings of the preciousness of Christ to the heart, and no sweet ministry from an ungrieved Spirit to the soul. The Bible seems a sealed book. All is dark, dreary and desolate.
- Planted — God gave the vineyard every advantage He could give; the failure was never on His side.
- Barren — He looked for praise, thanksgiving and worship; what came up was oppression, unrighteousness and idolatry.
- Dismantled — the fence, the temple, the service were all His work. God gave real privileges, and God took them all away.
- Overgrown — left alone, the ground yields the thorns of Eden's curse. In the millennium the myrtle will take their place.
- Dry — a shut heaven left the land barren. It leaves a soul out of communion just as barren, with the Bible a sealed book.
For the vineyard of Jehovah of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah the plant of his delight and he looked for justice, and behold, blood-shedding; for righteousness, and behold, a cry.
The love song about a vineyard ends here with the singer naming his subject: the vineyard is a nation. Two questions follow. What had God done for this vineyard? And what "fruit" was He looking for?
The picture is not decoration. Each feature of the vineyard stands for something God gave Israel.
Isaiah 5:1-7 explains the truth of the vineyard planted by a man: "the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the whole house of Israel" (v. 7). The hedge speaks of her separation from the nations. The place for the winepress tells of the provision God had made for Israel to give Him some return for His great goodness. The tower shows watchfulness against the intrusion of evil.
The verse names God as the owner of the vineyard. Everything it needed, He had already given.
There was no failure on God's part. He had established Israel in the most favourable position. He separated them to Himself, removed stumbling-blocks, and crowned them with favours. He granted not only protection but every means of blessing… Yet all was in vain. The result was only bad fruit… They, like Adam, broke the covenant. It was the old story over again. Human responsibility ends in total ruin.
The verse tells us what "grapes" meant to the owner. He was not counting sacrifices; He was looking at how people treated each other. (Older translations render the pair as "judgment… oppression" where the ESV has "justice… bloodshed.")
Result there was, but of a wholly worthless and evil sort. Where judgment should have been, oppression was found; where righteousness, only a cry of distress. Once again we have to notice that the charge against them concerns moral depravity rather than a lack of ceremonial observances.
The second half of the line narrows the focus from the whole house of Israel to the men of Judah — the tribe with the royal promise. That extra privilege made no difference to the outcome.
The choicest vine is also called the pleasant plant in v. 7, and this pleasant plant stands for the men of Judah… Despite the privileges shown them, because of God's covenant with David, they were no better than the other tribes. When the Lord Jesus came to earth, He was of the royal line.
Israel's case is not just old history. If the best-tended vineyard produced only wild grapes, no one can bring God fruit of his own.
God does not come and tell us that He expects something from man. He tells us something that will trouble us a great deal more — that man has failed to meet His requirements… He had every right to ask for fruit: "What could have been done more to my vineyard that I have not done in it?" But when He looked for grapes, it brought forth wild grapes… Do not then pretend to maintain the claims of God; if you do, you must satisfy them.
The picture of the vine runs on into the New Testament.
He planted Israel as a vine on the earth and looked for fruit, but it produced only wild grapes (Isaiah 5:1-7). He then planted the true Vine on the earth, which in every way gave much fruit (John 15:1). In another picture, the Lord let out a vineyard to Israel and prepared it for fruit-bearing. But when He sent for the fruit, they ill-treated and killed His servants. Last of all He sent His Son, but Him they killed also.
What Israel failed to give, Another gives. The Old Testament had already pointed to Him.
The Psalm declares the vine's desolation, but it also names "the Branch" and "the Son of Man," whom "you made strong for yourself." In Isaiah the reason for the desolation is plain. Israel as the vine brought forth nothing but wild and worthless grapes. There was no fruit for God. Jesus Himself was the Branch made strong for Jehovah, and He now presents Himself as the real Source of all fruit for God on the earth.
- Planted — every part of the vineyard was a gift. The hedge meant separation from the nations, the tower watchfulness against evil, the winepress a way to give God some return.
- Privileged — Judah, the "pleasant plant," had God's covenant with David. It still proved no better than the other tribes.
- Probed — God looked for justice and righteousness between people. He found oppression and a cry. The charge was moral, not ceremonial.
- Proved — nothing was lacking on God's side. So the barren crop settles the case: human responsibility ends in ruin. No one can bring God fruit of his own.
- Provided — last of all, God sent His Son. The true Vine now gives God the fruit the old vine never gave.
Woe unto them that add house to house, that join field to field, until there is no more room, and that ye dwell yourselves alone in the midst of the land!
Isaiah has just sung a love song about a vineyard that God planted with every care and that gave Him only sour fruit. Now the picture drops away. The prophet names the real sin: men who buy up house after house and field after field until no one else has room to stand.
The vineyard song ends with a question God asks His own people: judge between Me and My vineyard. Once they have heard it, the verdict is inevitable.
So the nation, as a whole, is weighed in the divine balances and found wanting. The case is so plain and so serious that God challenges the men of Judah to judge between Him and His vineyard — though they themselves are the degenerate trees in question. There was no more doubt about the goodness shown to Israel than about their obligation to bear fruit for God. But obligation produces no fruit fit for Him. What followed from a ground like this? Nothing but woe after woe. Their doom would match their guilt.
Six times the prophet says "woe" in this chapter, and this verse is the first. What provoked God was not ritual failure but behaviour.
With the song finished, the prophet dropped picture language. He gave the hard, plain facts of Israel's sin. Six times over he utters a "woe" on them in verses 8-25. Again we notice that it was their moral evils that stirred the divine anger. The first woe is flung at the men of grasping covetousness. They aimed at monopolising houses and lands for themselves. Judgment in the form of desolation for both houses and lands would fall on them.
The phrase "till there is no more room" has a victim built into it. One writer pictures Isaiah looking out of six windows onto six kinds of people.
He looks out of one window and sees the monopolist, the greedy, grasping man, who joins house to house and field to field until he has elbowed out everyone else. He cries woe to him.
Israel's land laws were designed to stop exactly this. Property could be leased but never permanently taken from the family that first received it.
One thing is made very plain. The land was God's. So those to whom He gave it could only let it go on lease, selling it until the jubilee came. The value of the lease fell as the jubilee drew near. No inheritance was to pass for good out of the family that first held it. In this way no grasping man could build up an estate of land. More important still, Israel had a constant reminder that they held everything they had from the Lord, and that they depended on Him. Do we who are Christians need this reminder any less than they did? Do we not rather need it more?
Other prophets named the same crime, and they aimed it at the rulers.
The prophets condemned abuses like Ahab's (Isa. 5:8). Micah says, "Woe to those who devise wickedness and work evil on their beds! When the morning dawns, they perform it, because it is in the power of their hand. They covet fields and seize them, and houses, and take them away; they oppress a man and his house, a man and his inheritance" (Micah 2:1-2)… The oppression of the ruling classes had grown worse since the days of Solomon… These passages show how deep and vile the corruption was — religious, moral and civic. It destroyed the life of both kingdoms until there was no remedy, and the unsparing stroke of judgment had to fall.
The next two verses spell out what God will do. The very land they hoarded turns against them.
There is a woe for those who joined house to house and field to field. They cared for nothing but their own advancement. The Lord will make the land desolate, so their coveted vineyards and lands will yield only a tenth of what they put into them.
The same drive is alive wherever people measure their lives by what they hold.
Love of the world. Talk to some people about adding faith to faith, one degree of grace to another. You will find they have more appetite for joining house to house and laying field to field. Their souls are thirsty, but not for Christ or heaven. It is earth, earth. They never think they have enough, until death comes and stops their mouth with a shovelful of soil dug out of their own grave.
Covetousness hides best from the person who has it.
It is one thing to see it in others, and quite another to judge it in ourselves. Only one thing can enable us to detect the hateful sin of covetousness. It is the light of the Word of God shining into the soul, reaching every room of our moral being. The pursuit of gain, the wish to have more, the spirit of business, the ability to make money, the desire to get on — all this is so "highly esteemed among men." Very few are ready to see that it is "an abomination in the sight of God."
- Gift — The land was God's. Israel held it on lease until the jubilee, so no one could build a permanent estate. Every field reminded them that they owned nothing outright.
- Grasp — The first of six woes falls on greed. Men bought up houses and lands, and cared for nothing but their own advancement.
- Crowd — "No more room" means the greedy man had elbowed out his neighbours. Other prophets name the same crime: men who covet fields and seize them.
- Collapse — The punishment fits the crime. The hoarded houses stand empty, and the coveted fields yield a tenth of what went into them.
- Cure — This appetite is "earth, earth", never satisfied until the grave. Only the light of God's Word shining into the soul shows it up as an abomination, not ambition.
In mine ears Jehovah of hosts [hath said], Many houses shall assuredly become a desolation, great and excellent ones, without inhabitant.
The song of the vineyard is over, and the plain charges begin with greed for houses and land. Verse 9 is God's sworn reply, and it matches the sin: the fine houses they collected will stand empty.
What stirs God's anger here is not a failure in worship. It is how these people treated their neighbours.
When the song of Isaiah ended, the prophet dropped picture language for the hard, plain facts of Israel's sin. Six times he speaks a "Woe" over them in verses 8-25, and again we notice that it was their moral evils that stirred God's anger. The first woe is aimed at grasping, greedy men who wanted all the houses and lands for themselves. Judgment would fall on them: desolation for both houses and lands.
Israel's law deliberately blocked the building of large estates, which is what makes the accumulation in verse 8 an offence against God's own arrangement of the land.
Property always stayed in the family. No one could buy up and build a large estate (Leviticus 25:13-36; 1 Kings 21:3). The law also enforced care for the poor (Deuteronomy 24:19-21; 15:7-11), consideration for others (Leviticus 19:13-14, 32-36), and love for your neighbour (Leviticus 19:18).
This was not one prophet's private complaint. Israel's rulers were taking what belonged to others, and other prophets named the same sin.
Those who ruled in Israel took for themselves what belonged to others, as in the case of Naboth's vineyard (1 Kings 21). The prophets spoke out against abuses like Ahab's (Isaiah 5:8). Micah says, "Woe to those who devise wickedness and work evil on their beds! When the morning dawns, they perform it, because it is in the power of their hand. They covet fields and seize them, and houses, and take them away; they oppress a man and his house, a man and his inheritance" (Micah 2:1-2). … The oppression of the ruling classes had grown in evil from the days of Solomon.
God gives His own title here: "the LORD of hosts." That name first appears when His people had sunk low, and it names the armies and forces He commands.
We do not meet this name until 1 Samuel 1:3. It came in with prophetic testimony, when faith took hold of the LORD's glory at a time when Israel had corrupted themselves and were weak and low. Scripture shows that there is a mighty heavenly army, and rulers and powers in the unseen world. God is the God of them all. He is also God of all the forces of nature, which He has often used to punish His enemies.
Verse 9 empties the houses. Verse 10 shrinks the harvest. Both strokes hit what the greedy had wanted most.
There is a woe for those who joined house to house and field to field, caring for nothing but their own gain. The LORD will make their land desolate, so the vineyards and fields they coveted will yield only a tenth of what they put in (verses 8-10).
The measures in the next verse are not decoration. Read as real quantities, they show what a hostile harvest looks like.
Isaiah 5:10 shows that there is a curse resting upon the fields of a covetous man.
Behind the land-grabbing lies a thirst that never says "enough."
Love of the world. Talk to some people about adding faith to faith, one degree of grace to another, and you will find they would rather join house to house and lay field to field. Their souls are thirsty, but not for Christ or heaven. It is earth, earth — they never think they have enough of it, until death comes and stops their mouth with a shovelful of soil dug out of their own grave!
- Grasping. The first of six woes in this chapter hits greed. People wanted all the houses and lands for themselves. Moral evil, not ritual failure, stirred God's anger.
- Stealing. Israel's law kept property in the family, so no one could build a large estate. Joining house to house broke a system that protected the poor and the neighbour.
- Sworn. "The LORD of hosts" speaks the sentence in the prophet's ear. That name appears when His people are at their lowest, and it carries the armies of heaven and the forces of nature behind it.
- Emptied. The judgment mirrors the crime. The grand houses stand without a soul in them, and the fields return a fraction of what was sown.
- Buried. The thirst behind the sin never says "enough." It says "earth, earth," until death closes the mouth with a shovelful of grave dirt.
Yea, ten acres of vineyard shall yield one bath, and a homer of seed shall yield an ephah.
This verse sentences the men described just before it — those who buy up house after house and field after field until no one else has room. God does not take their land away; He leaves it in their hands and drains it of fruit.
The "acre" here is not a fixed area of ground. It is a day's work. One writer traces the word behind it.
In Isaiah 5:10 the word is tsemed, "a pair, or yoke." The "acre" was as much land as a yoke of oxen would plough in a day… We have no way of finding out how large the Jewish acre was. It is not listed with the usual weights and measures as a set measure of land. The passage in Isaiah 5:10, "ten acres of vineyard shall yield but one bath," clearly refers to a time of great scarcity which Jehovah would send upon Israel in judgment.
The second half of the verse switches from wine to grain. One writer sorts out which measures are liquid and which are dry.
Isaiah 5:10 makes clear that Ezekiel mentions both liquid and dry measure: the bath is the liquid one and the ephah the dry one. The homer is the standard for both, a measure roughly estimated at 11 bushels, or 90 gallons.
An ephah is a tenth of a homer. Sow a sack, reap a tenth of it back. Drink and food fail together.
One writer draws a lesson from figures like these.
Though all these calculations are only rough, they help to throw light on many passages of scripture. So Isaiah 5:10 shows that there is a curse resting on the fields of a covetous man.
The men had gathered these fields at everyone else's expense. God's reply matches what they were after.
There is a woe to those who joined house to house and field to field, careless of everything but their own gain. Jehovah will lay it waste, so that their coveted vineyards and lands will yield only a tenth of what they put in.
The song of the vineyard has ended. This verse falls inside the first of a series of woes.
When the song of Isaiah ended, the prophet dropped picture language for the hard, plain facts of Israel's sin. Six times over he utters a "Woe" upon them in verses 8-25. Again we notice that it was their moral evils that stirred the anger of God. The first woe is flung at the men of grasping greed, who aimed at owning all the houses and lands themselves. Judgment would fall on them: desolation for both houses and lands.
The chapter opens with a song about God's own vineyard. It names all the care He put into it, and the fruit He got back.
There was no failure on God's part. He had put Israel in the best possible position. He set them apart for Himself, removed every obstacle, and crowned them with favours. He gave them not only protection but every means of blessing… Yet it was all in vain. The result was only bad fruit… Human responsibility ends in total ruin.
God had received a poor return from His vineyard; now their vineyards give them a poor return.
Under the grasping lies a thirst. One writer names what it is set on.
Love of the world. Tell some people about adding faith to faith, one degree of grace to another. You will find they have more mind to join house to house, and lay field to field. Their souls are thirsty, but not for Christ or heaven. It is earth, earth — they never think they have enough of it, till death comes and stops their mouth with a shovelful dug out of their own grave.
- Grasp — The verse sentences the men just described. They join house to house and field to field, careless of all but their own gain.
- Sentence — What he seized is what God empties. Desolation falls on both the houses and the lands he collected.
- Measure — Ten acres, ten days' ploughing, yield one bath; a homer of seed returns an ephah, a tenth. The numbers are the judgment.
- Mirror — God gave His vineyard every care and got bad fruit. Now their own fields pay them back in kind.
- Heart — Behind the shrinking harvest lies a thirst for earth, not for Christ. It never says "enough" until the grave stops the mouth.
Woe unto them that, rising early in the morning, run after strong drink; that linger till twilight, [till] wine inflameth them!
This second "woe" in Isaiah's list falls on people who build the whole day around drink, from dawn to nightfall. Why does God answer such a life with a woe and not a mild warning?
Isaiah has stopped singing about the vineyard and turned to plain facts. One commentator counts the woes that follow:
The song of Isaiah ended, the prophet dropped figurative language for the hard, plain facts of Israel's sin. Six times over he pronounces a "Woe" upon them in verses 8-25. Again we notice that it was their moral evils that stirred the Divine anger. The first woe is flung at the men of grasping covetousness. They aimed at monopolising houses and lands for themselves.
Counts differ. One writer finds six woes in this chapter; another traces a sevenfold denunciation that runs past it. And the prophet who pronounced these woes later had one to pronounce over himself:
It was a wonderful interlude of grace to the prophet. He had been pronouncing woe upon every phase of wickedness in Israel (Isaiah 5:8, 11, 18, 20-22), and had still to complete the solemn sevenfold denunciation of it in Isaiah 10:1. Now he has to pronounce it upon himself: "Woe is me! For I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips... for my eyes have seen the King, the Lord of hosts."
No normal hour and no normal measure satisfies this appetite — the wine itself keeps inflaming it. One commentator, writing on a similar passage in Proverbs, explains why the drinker keeps reaching for more:
Of all the lusts of the flesh, none from first to last exposes a person so much to shame and grief as drunkenness. Others may be fatally ruinous to oneself or to our partners. But this one is more stupefying, more senseless, and more inclined to both folly and violence... For intemperance always seeks more and stronger stimulants, until the thirst for them becomes overpowering.
The people under this woe are not casual drinkers. They hunt pleasure the way others pursue a trade — and Isaiah puts them in the same list as land-grabbers and bribe-takers:
There is a woe to those who joined house to house and field to field, careless of everything but their own gain: Jehovah will make it desolate so that their coveted vineyards and lands yield only a tenth of what they put in (vv. 8-10). There is a woe to the luxurious hunters of social pleasure: captivity will drain them, and Hades itself will swallow up the low and the mighty — multitudes beyond measure (vv. 11-17).
Another writer sets the woes side by side to show that each sin has its own matching end:
God enters into details to show the righteousness of His judgments. It is not only covetousness ending in desolation, and corrupt luxury ending in death and hell. There are also excuses for wrongdoing that grow into contempt for divine judgment. We see this in the profane indifference of Christendom, when men have God's warnings and think God will never carry them out.
One writer runs the list of Isaiah 5 straight into his own day:
History is repeating itself. The state of humanity could not be more truly described today. The profiteer was busy (Isa. 5:8). Men and women piped and danced, eagerly following their pagan pleasure without a thought of God, or fear of His just judgments (Isa. 5:11-12).
And the outcome is not confined to Israel:
The second woe is against the drunkard and pleasure-seeker. He describes the judgment awaiting them down to verse 17. We may observe that a similar catastrophe always follows a people given over to pleasure and debauchery. The great Roman Empire did it in her later years, and then crashed. If Britain and other nations of today do it — what then?
- Woe — This is the second woe in Isaiah's list, and it falls on moral evil. The prophet who pronounced it later had to say "Woe is me" when he saw the King.
- Appetite — The early start and the late night mark the drunkard. Intemperance keeps asking for more and stronger drink until the thirst takes over.
- Career — These are not casual drinkers. They are "luxurious hunters of social pleasure," and the hunt is their way of life.
- End — Each sin gets its matching judgment. Covetousness ends in desolation, corrupt luxury ends in death and hell, and Hades swallows low and mighty alike.
- Echo — The pattern still runs. Rome went the same way, and any people given over to pleasure and debauchery invites the same collapse.
And harp and lyre, tambour and flute, and wine are in their banquets; but they regard not the work of Jehovah, nor do they see the operation of his hands.
Isaiah 5 pronounces a series of woes on God's people, and this verse sits inside the second one. Their feasts are full of music and wine, but they give no thought to what God is doing.
One writer names who this woe targets, and what happens to nations that live this way.
The second woe is against the drunkard and pleasure-seeker. The passage describes the judgment awaiting them down to verse 17. Notice that a similar disaster always follows a people given over to pleasure and wild living. The great Roman Empire did it in her later years, and then crashed. If Britain and other nations of today do it — what then?
Another writer sums up where this pleasure ends:
There is a woe for the luxury-loving hunters of social pleasure. Captivity will drain them away, and Hades, the place of the dead, will swallow up the lowly and the mighty alike — crowds beyond counting (vv. 11-17).
One instrument in the list is hard to identify. Older translations call it a "viol," and a Bible dictionary explains what is known about it:
The main word used is nebel. It seems to refer to some unknown stringed instrument that went with the singing voice. It is at times mentioned along with the harp. The same word is also translated VIOL in Isaiah 5:12; Isaiah 14:11; Amos 5:23; Amos 6:5.
Nothing in the list is evil in itself. The charge is about the purpose these good things now serve.
Man's heart is estranged from God. He was set at a distance from God, and he tries to make the earth as pleasing to himself as possible. To do this, he uses God's gifts and creatures so that he can do without Him. People say there is no harm in these things. That is true, but that is not the question. They are good as created things. There will be music in heaven too, as a picture. But in heaven no one will use it to entertain the mind apart from God. It is a question of the use we make of these things.
The habit is older than Israel. One writer traces the arts back to the family of Cain. Cain was the son of Adam who murdered his brother. This verse, the writer says, shows what those arts became:
The useful arts, and the fair decorations of life, owe their invention to the family of Cain (Genesis 4:21-22). These things can serve good ends when they are used for God. But as human inventions on their own, they are the chief food and comfort of that "pride of life" which keeps the unrepentant world at a willing distance from the God of grace (Isaiah 5:12).
One writer puts this verse beside Belshazzar. He was the king of Babylon who feasted while using the vessels taken from God's temple.
Belshazzar forgot the captivity of Zion without a care, and he profaned the vessels of God's temple. He gave no thought to the works of His hands, but the wine and the tambourine were in his feast. It is the same now. People agree together to forget the rejection of Christ, so that a man may meet his neighbour and greet him with a shared joy and a shared welcome, because they are all of one earth, of the same world, of related flesh and blood.
Judgment does not fall at once, and the wicked treat that gap as their chance.
The Israelites despise the warning of judgment; the wicked take advantage of the delay... But God does not hurry His counsel. He is patient with us. He does not want anyone to perish, but wants everyone to come to repentance. He knows well that He must judge at the end. Man clings to his own wisdom, and as long as God does not discipline him, man hardens his heart.
- Gift. Lyre, harp, tambourine, flute and wine are all God's creatures, good in themselves — there will be music in heaven too.
- Misuse. The sin is the purpose: using God's gifts so that a person can enjoy the world and do without Him.
- Blindness. Pleasure fills them, so they never notice what God is doing. Belshazzar's feast showed the same forgetting.
- Delay. God holds back judgment out of patience. Man reads that patience as indifference and hardens his heart.
- End. Captivity drains the pleasure-seekers away, and the place of the dead swallows small and great alike.
Therefore my people are led away captive from lack of knowledge, and their nobility die of famine, and their multitude are parched with thirst.
Isaiah 5 sings of a vineyard that God planted and tended, only to find wild grapes. Verse 13 is the verdict on the people that vineyard stands for: they would not notice God's work, and they lose their land, their honour and their bread.
The judgment in this chapter is not random. God weighs a people against all He had given them.
God considers whether the vineyard bears the fruit that a vineyard so cared for ought to bear. It is a general principle that applies to the Jews, to the church, and to each individual. If the church has received more than the Jews, God is entitled to expect that it produce more.
The word "therefore" reaches back to verses 11–12. Men rose early for strong drink and filled their feasts with music and wine. They paid no attention to what God was doing. One writer sets each woe beside its punishment. This one runs from banquet to grave.
There is a woe for those who live for luxury and hunt social pleasure. Captivity will drain them. Hades itself will swallow up the lowly and the mighty — crowds beyond counting (vv. 11–17).
The link between the party and the exile is stated in verse 12: they did not regard the work of the Lord. Another writer quotes verses 11–14 as a single unbroken sentence of doom, and applies it to a recognisable type of person:
when the prophet's woe is fulfilled on the careless pleasure-loving worldling… "but they regard not the work of the Lord, neither consider the operation of His hands. Therefore my people are gone into captivity, because they have no knowledge; and their honourable men are famished, and their multitude dried up with thirst."
The knowledge Israel lacked was not information. It was knowing God Himself. One writer calls this failure the standing reproach of the nation. He quotes a charge from Isaiah's first chapter that sounds much like our verse.
Ignorance of God was a continual reproach to that people. "Israel does not know, my people do not understand," is the telling conclusion of Jehovah. He finds the children of His covenant lower than the animals, which know the hand that feeds them (Isaiah 1). Light shone in the hearts of the small remnant that the Lord of hosts kept. But from Egypt onwards the nation was foolish and sinful… This national ignorance reached its lowest point when, not knowing what they did, they crucified the Son of God… Yet for the house of Israel and the house of Judah it is promised and provided, in the days to come, that all that nation, from the smallest to the greatest, will truly know the Lord.
Israel was not left without teaching, so their not knowing was a choice. One commentator writes on a similar charge, that Israel was a nation without understanding. He names both the fault and the cure.
Counsel was available to them in the word of God. They had no good reason to be without understanding. Their ignorance had no excuse. Remember that the word "ignorance" comes from the word "ignore." Israel had ignored what was clearly taught to them, so they were ignorant… An obedient heart will always have understanding.
Older translations read verse 13 as "my people are gone into captivity." One writer takes that past tense at face value. Part of the blow had already fallen, while the rest of the nation carried on as before.
From verse 13 it seems that some of Israel had already been taken into captivity. But the people of Jerusalem and Judah were still unrepentant. They were almost mocking the prophetic word that warned them what was about to happen to those left in the land… They soon knew what God's counsel was. His judgment fell on the city and the temple because of the sin of the people.
Commentators do not leave the phrase in the past. One writer sets it beside a matching cry from Hosea. He applies it to people who own a Bible and still starve.
There is a great deal of Bible knowledge today, and much familiarity with the facts and details of Scripture. Even so, the children of God are suffering much through "lack of knowledge." In the last days of Israel's history the prophet had to cry sadly, "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge" (Hosea 4:6). Today God's people are immense losers through lack of knowledge of Christ. Many seem to think that the highest blessing they can know here is present forgiveness of sins. So they get entangled with much that is contrary to the Lord's mind, and harmful to their own souls.
- Care — God measured the vineyard by what He had put into it. The same test applies to the church and to each person: more given means more expected.
- Blindness — the feasting of verses 11–12 was not harmless. Those who lived for luxury and never looked at God's work were the ones captivity would drain.
- Cause — the missing knowledge was knowledge of God Himself: "Israel does not know, my people do not understand." Yet God promises a day when the whole nation will truly know Him.
- Choice — ignorance came from ignoring. God's counsel was there for the taking, so an obedient heart would have understood.
- Cost — part of the exile had already begun while Jerusalem still mocked. God's people today are still "immense losers through lack of knowledge of Christ."
Therefore doth Sheol enlarge its desire, and open its mouth without measure; and her splendour shall descend [into it], and her multitude, and her tumult, and [all] that is joyful within her.
Isaiah 5 opens with a song about God's vineyard, which gave Him only bad fruit; from verse 8 the song turns into a series of woes. This verse sits in the second woe, and it shows where a life spent on pleasure ends.
The verse opens with "therefore." It points back to the drinking and pleasure just described. One commentator lays out the woes of the chapter in order, and what each one brings.
There is a woe to those who joined house to house and field to field, careless of everything but their own gain. Jehovah will make it desolate, so that their coveted vineyards and lands will yield only a tenth of what they put in (vv. 8-10). There is a woe to the pleasure-hunters of society. Captivity will drain them, and Hades itself will swallow up both the lowly and the mighty — multitudes without measure (vv. 11-17).
The verse names Sheol. The word does not have one fixed sense everywhere it appears. A reference work sums up how it is used.
Sheol is often translated "grave," and three times "pit." It refers to an invisible place or state, which may have several applications, depending on the context of each passage.
So the picture is not simply a burial place. It is the unseen world taking people in. The name itself may explain the mouth stretched wide here. One writer weighs where the word comes from.
The word seems to come from shaal, "to ask." Most take its meaning from the way death never stops "demanding" its victims. Others suggest, and it seems just as likely, that it comes instead from the "questioning" about the dead, as in Job 14:10: "man breathes his last, and where is he?" Writers agree that Sheol matches the Greek word hades. From the only likely derivation, its sense is the "unseen" — the invisible world, as people sometimes say.
The grave's hunger has a human counterpart. Writing about the proud conqueror of Habakkuk 2, who "enlarges his desire as Sheol," a commentator points to this verse and to the same restless craving in those who rule nations.
This man, the Chaldean, was drunk with self-importance and ambitious desires. He could not be content with successes already won, and he was never satisfied (Prov. 30:16; Isa. 5:14). He made himself the centre of everything, of the people and the nations. From the beginning until now, hasn't this been the thought, the longing, and the politics of those who lead the nations? Isn't it still?
Those swallowed up are named by their splendour, not their crimes — everything a society is proud of goes down together. A writer notes what stirred God's anger in these woes, and how the pattern has repeated since.
The second woe is against the drunkard and pleasure-seeker. The passage describes the judgment waiting for them down to verse 17. Notice that the same disaster always follows a people given over to pleasure and wild living. The great Roman Empire did this in her later years, and then crashed. If Britain and other nations of today do it — what then?
Isaiah's picture is not left behind in the Old Testament. Commenting on the fourth seal, where Death rides and Hades follows him, a writer reaches back to this verse for the imagery.
The pale horse, a picture of haggard want and despair, has Death as its rider. Hades, the unseen world, follows behind him, as if to devour his victims, just as the prophet pictures it… The sword ravages whole lands. War leaves the wretched survivors with wasted fields and supplies, to die of hunger and plague. Wild beasts leave their lairs and prowl over the ruined countryside. Such is a picture of the woes hanging over this world.
- Privilege — God tended a vineyard and got bad fruit, so the song of chapter 5 turns into woes.
- Pleasure — this woe targets the drunkard and the pleasure-seeker; Rome went the same road in her later years and crashed.
- Appetite — Sheol never stops "demanding" its victims; the proud ruler who is never satisfied copies it.
- Reach — Sheol swallows the lowly and the mighty alike, multitudes without measure; rank, crowds and revelry go down together.
- Reckoning — the same picture returns later: Death rides, Hades follows to devour, and the woes still hang over this world.
And the mean man shall be bowed down, and the great man brought low, and the eyes of the lofty shall be brought low;
Isaiah 5 opens with a song about a vineyard. God planted it and cared for it, and it gave Him worthless fruit. The chapter then turns to a run of woes against the people. Verse 15 is where those woes land: a whole society bent down, small and great alike, with proud eyes forced to the ground.
This humbling is not a random disaster. It is the announced end of a way of living Isaiah has just named.
The second woe is against the drunkard and pleasure-seeker. The judgment awaiting them is described down to verse 17. We may notice that a similar collapse always follows a people given over to pleasure and debauchery. The great Roman Empire did it in her later years, and then crashed. If Britain and other nations of today do it — what then?
The verse brings man down in general and each one in particular. Older translations make the two classes plain: "the mean man" and "the great man", the lowly and the important. One judgment takes both.
There is a woe against those who chase luxury and social pleasure. Captivity will drain them, and Hades itself will swallow up the lowly and the mighty — crowds beyond counting (vv. 11-17).
The verse ends with the eyes. Why would God single out a look?
Yes, it is pride which calls for being brought low. The day of Jehovah of hosts is against everything proud and lofty, and against all that is lifted up, to bring it low. The loftiness of man will be bowed down, and the haughtiness of men made low. Jehovah alone will be exalted in that day (Isa. 2:12-17).
This is not God grudging man greatness. God has His own way of lifting man up. The tragedy is that man grabs at height on his own terms.
God has lifted man up in Christ, in His own gracious and wonderful way. Yet man, by exalting himself, drags himself down to his own ruin. "Man's day" is a day when man makes himself great with what he has robbed from God, and lifts himself up by what God's mercy has given him. And so the day of the Lord must come against everything proud and haughty, and against all that is lifted up (Isa. 2:12).
Every proud head goes down in the end. The question is whether it bows now or is broken later.
Grace bows our hearts now, and we confess His name with joy! In that day judgment will break the proud spirit of the enemy. When His anger is kindled just a little — that is the beginning of His judgment — they perish from the way.
Later chapters of Isaiah add something to this. God does not only push a proud people down. He can also work lowliness into them.
They are promised that everything high and lofty will be brought low. And grace can give poverty of spirit and lowliness to the Jews themselves, once so proud. They will have come through tremendous trials. They will have carried the extra and painful shame of being a most guilty and yet haughty people. But all is changed now.
- Cause — pleasure. Verse 15 is where the woe against drink and pleasure-seeking ends. The same collapse has followed other nations with the same appetite.
- Reach — everyone. Small man and great man go down together. The judgment that swallows the mighty swallows the ordinary too.
- Target — pride. God aims at the lifted-up look. Pride is what calls for being brought low.
- Irony — self-ruin. God's own way of raising man is in Christ. Man's way is to exalt himself with what he has taken from God, and so he ruins himself.
- Choice — bowed or broken. Grace bows the heart now, and the confession is a joy. Judgment breaks the proud spirit later. Grace can go further still and give lowliness to those who were once the proudest.
and Jehovah of hosts shall be exalted in judgment, and the holy God hallowed in righteousness.
Isaiah's song of the vineyard has just exposed a nation that took every gift from God and gave back wild grapes. The woes that follow bring the proud and the greedy low, and God alone stands high — exalted, holy and righteous.
The chapter is God putting a question to a people He had planted and protected. One writer notes that the standard is not arbitrary — it rises with the privilege given.
God considers whether the vineyard bears the fruit that a vineyard so cared for ought to bear. It is a general principle that applies to the Jews, to the church, and to each individual. If the church has received more than the Jews, God is entitled to expect that it produce more. When you look at the glory of Christ, you see what ought to match that glory. God has shaped the whole situation, among the Jews and in the church, with Christ in view.
Verse 15 has just described everyone humbled — ordinary people, important people, proud eyes. That reversal runs all through Isaiah. One writer traces it to the root problem: self-exaltation.
God has exalted man in Christ, in His own gracious and wonderful way. Yet man, by exalting himself, drags himself down to his own ruin... "man's day" is a day when man makes himself great with what he has taken from God, and lifts himself up with what God's mercy has given him. And therefore the day of the Lord must be "against all that is proud and lofty, against all that is lifted up... And the haughtiness of man shall be humbled, and the lofty pride of men shall be brought low, and the LORD alone will be exalted in that day." (Isa. 2:12, 17.)
The verse names Him "the Holy God." One writer draws out what the title means.
The name "Holy One of Israel" means that the God of Israel is completely separated from all evil. His eyes are too pure to look at evil. This is also what the seraphim express who cry out in front of His throne: "Holy, holy, holy is the LORD of hosts."
Older wording says the holy God is hallowed, or sanctified. God cannot be made holier than He is, so the word must mean something else here.
Again, how can we think of God Himself, or the Lord Jesus, as being sanctified? The angels cover their faces in His presence and cry, "Holy, holy, holy is the LORD of hosts." In this sense alone the Lord Jesus has set Himself apart in heaven for our sakes. In this same sense we can set God Himself apart in our hearts. That means always giving Him that place of supremacy and honour which is His by right.
God shows His holiness through faith that welcomes His grace. Where there is no faith, He shows it another way.
Jehovah must therefore sanctify Himself in judgment, if there is no faith to receive His grace. So it was at the end of the Jewish age. So it will be at the end of the Christian age. And so the earth will be filled with His glory. Scripture says here: "when your judgments are in the earth, the inhabitants of the world learn righteousness." (Isa. 26:9.)
The verse is severe, but judgment is not the end of the story. It serves something beyond itself.
Grace has already been offered, and its purposes and provisions have been brought out and revealed. But that grace was despised. So judgment enters, and judgment teaches righteousness. Then grace will have gathered its own, and judgment will have cleared the scene. Glory will be revealed and set up. The kingdom will be the place of living, practical righteousness.
- Planted. God's claim on Israel rests on what He gave her. The same measure applies to every people and person He has favoured: more given, more expected.
- Refused. Grace was offered first. People despised it, so judgment came in to teach righteousness instead.
- Lowered. The proud are not brought low by accident. It is the fixed pattern of God's day: self-exaltation ends in self-ruin.
- Hallowed. To "sanctify" God is to give Him the place of supremacy that is already His by right. If people will not give Him that place, His judgments will.
- Restored. The end is not ruin but glory. Judgment clears the scene, and His kingdom becomes the place where righteousness is lived out.
And the lambs shall feed as on their pasture, and the waste places of the fat ones shall strangers eat.
Verse 17 closes a stretch of woes aimed at a nation that had everything from God and gave Him nothing back. Lambs now graze over ground that belonged to the rich. The verse shows what God's judgment leaves behind: ruined estates, with flocks and outsiders feeding on them.
The verse is the last line of a warning aimed at people who lived for pleasure. One writer sums up the woe that ends in this verse:
There is a woe against those who hunt luxury and social pleasure. Captivity will drain them away, and the world of the dead will swallow up the lowly and the mighty alike — crowds beyond counting (vv. 11-17).
Judgment took away the owners, but it left no golden age behind. Grazing flocks and passing strangers are all that remain.
The ruins in this verse were once the estates of a nation God had equipped with everything:
Israel had been the Lord's vineyard, and He had arranged everything in their favour. He put them in a very fruitful place and gave them all they needed. The law, given through Moses, fenced them in to keep outside corruption away — if they had kept it. They were also a "choicest vine," since they came from Abraham, one of God's choicest saints. So everything was in their favour. What was the result?
The answer came back in a single verdict, and the woes follow from it:
So the nation as a whole is weighed in God's scales and found wanting… The goodness God showed to Israel was as certain as their duty to bear fruit for Him. But duty on its own produces no fruit fit for Him. What was the result on ground like this? Nothing but woe after woe. Their doom would match their guilt.
God looked for justice, and found something else:
There was a result, but it was worthless and evil. In place of justice there was oppression; in place of righteousness, only a cry of distress. Again we should notice that the charge against them is moral corruption, not a failure to keep religious ceremonies.
Even the quiet scene in verse 17 is emptiness, not peace. One writer explains what is missing from the whole chapter:
Notice that there is nothing of Christ here as the means and channel of grace. So everything is darkness and death, with no relief. The prophet presses home the evidence of constant, overwhelming evil among the people of God. Not a ray of comfort or even hope breaks through. Only their sins and His judgments sound out, one answering the other. This is the severity of God, Who did not spare the natural branches, as the apostle says in Rom. 11:21.
The ruined vineyard is not only Israel's story. One writer takes it to the cross:
When the Lord Jesus spoke of Himself as "the true Vine," (John 15:1), the minds of His disciples may well have turned back to this scripture, as ours also may do. Israel was the sample of humanity chosen to test the whole human race. The condemnation of Israel is the condemnation of us all. But it was at the cross of Christ that this condemnation was announced openly and for the last time. The first man and his race: condemned and rejected. The Second Man, and those who belong to Him and are in Him: accepted and established for ever.
What happened to these estates has happened since. One writer points to history:
We may notice that the same kind of disaster always follows a people given over to pleasure and vice. The great Roman Empire did it in her later years, and then crashed. If Britain and other nations of today do it — what then?
- Planted. God gave this nation good soil, a law to guard them, and the best ancestry. Everything was in their favour.
- Failed. God weighed them and found them wanting. He looked for justice and found oppression; He looked for righteousness and heard a cry.
- Judged. The doom matched the guilt. The pleasure-seekers went into captivity, and death swallowed the lowly and the mighty alike.
- Emptied. Chapter 5 has nothing of Christ in it, so nothing softens it. Only sins and judgments answer each other, and lambs graze where rich estates stood.
- Replaced. The failed vine points to the true Vine. The first man and his race are set aside; the Second Man and all who are in Him stand for ever.
Woe unto them that draw iniquity with cords of vanity, and sin as with cart-ropes!
Isaiah 5 sings of a vineyard God planted and cared for, which then gave Him wild grapes. The chapter closes with a string of woes, and the third one, in verse 18, pictures sin as a load men harness themselves to and haul along.
Commentators read the woes of this chapter as portraits of a nation gone wrong. This one is not aimed at the quiet or the secret sinner.
The third woe (verse 18) falls on those who sin openly and violently, in defiance of God. The fourth falls on men of a more subtle kind, who overturn all the foundations of right and wrong.
One writer pictures the prophet at a window, naming one kind of sinner after another. The cart-rope pullers come third, after the grasping landowner and the drunkard.
He looks out of one window and sees the man who grabs everything — greedy for more, joining house to house and field to field until everyone else is pushed out. He cries woe to him. Then he looks out of another window, sees the drunkard deep in his drink, and cries woe to him. Next he marks the out-and-out sinners, those who draw sin as with cart ropes — the prostitute, the gambler, the swearer — and he pronounces woe on them.
The picture is of an animal in harness, straining at a heavy wagon. No one drags these men into evil; they lean into the rope. And once they pull, they lose their sight of right and wrong.
Crime was everywhere, for men had grown fearless in their godlessness. They gave free rein to their wilful passions, sinning "as with cart ropes". Blinded by the god of this world, they called evil good, and good evil.
The verse names two ropes: cords of falsehood first, then cart ropes. What starts as a thin lie ends up towing a wagon-load.
In the next verse these people dare God to get on with it — let His work hurry up so they can see it. That is what turns bad behaviour into insult.
It is not only greed that ends in ruin, and corrupt luxury that ends in death and hell. There are also excuses for sin that grow into contempt for God's judgment. We see it in the godless indifference of the Christian world, where men have God's warnings and think they will never be carried out. "Scoffers will come in the last days with scoffing, following their own sinful desires. They will say, 'Where is the promise of His coming?'" (2 Peter 3:3-4). It matches the insult against God in verses 18 and 19.
They read delay as absence. They take God's patience as proof that nothing is coming.
Isaiah does not stop at naming the sin. He names where it lands, and he groups the scoffers of verse 18 with the corrupters who follow them.
The bold sinners mocked the LORD and invited Him to hurry, so that they might see His work (verses 18, 19). For them, and for the moral corrupters who broke down every moral distinction, there is woe upon woe with utter destruction.
The verse is about drawing. One writer sets another drawing against it, made by a Man lifted up in death, whose pull reaches the very people who had been hauling sin.
His being lifted up was the witness in the world of this — that He submitted to Satan, to death, and to the judgment that sin brings, the very state in which men were lying. I say, the witness lifted up in the world, the point that draws all … the cords of a man to those who had been sinning even with a cart rope.
- Cords. Men do not stumble into this sin; they haul it — first with thin cords of falsehood, then with ropes fit for a wagon.
- Boldness. The woe targets those who sin openly and violently, in defiance of God, not the quiet or the hidden offender.
- Willingness. Men had grown fearless in their godlessness and gave free rein to their wilful passions. The load moves because they want it to.
- Contempt. The pulling ends in mockery: they dare God to hurry His work. It matches the scoffers who ask where the promise of His coming is.
- Counter-pull. Against every cart rope stands a Man lifted up. He draws with the cords of a man the same people who once hauled sin.
who say, Let him hasten, let him speed his work, that we may see [it]; and let the counsel of the Holy One of Israel draw nigh and come, that we may know it!
Isaiah 5 turns from a song about a vineyard into a series of woes. This one falls on people who heard God's warnings and answered with a dare. Their words almost sound like faith. They ask to see God's work and to know His counsel. But the men who said them had already decided that nothing would happen.
This woe falls on bold sinners, not careless ones. One writer sets their dare beside the other sins the chapter names, and gives the reason for the woe:
There is a woe to those who joined house to house and field to field. They were reckless of everything but their own gain... Think of the bold sinners, who mockingly invited Jehovah to hurry so that they might see His work. Think of the moral corrupters, who broke down every moral distinction. Think of the wise in their own eyes, who could do without God. For all of them there is woe upon woe with utter destruction, "because they have rejected the law of the LORD of hosts, and have despised the word of the Holy One of Israel."
The mocking demand is the last step in a slide. One writer traces the steps, and finds the same spirit alive today:
God enters into details to show the righteousness of His judgments. It is not only covetousness that ends in desolation, and corrupt luxury that ends in death and hell. Excuses for wrongdoing also grow into contempt for God's judgment. We see this in the careless indifference of the Christian world, where men have God's warnings and think God will never carry them out. "Scoffers will come in the last days with scoffing, following their own sinful desires. They will say, 'Where is the promise of his coming?'" (2 Peter 3:3-4). It answers to the insult offered to God in verses 18, 19.
The mockers were trading on a delay. God had announced judgment, and it had not come. The delay had a reason, and it was not weakness:
The Israelites despise the warning of judgment. The wicked take advantage of the delay. The same thing was to happen in the last days of the Christian testimony (2 Peter 3). But God does not hurry His counsel. He is patient toward us, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. He knows well that He must judge at the end. Man attaches himself to his own wisdom, and as long as God does not chastise, man hardens his heart.
They asked to know God's counsel. God answered them, but not in the way they expected:
From verse 13 it would seem that some of Israel had already been taken into captivity. But the people of Jerusalem and Judah were still unrepentant. They were almost mocking the prophetic word that warned them of what was about to come on those who remained in the land... They very soon knew what God's counsel was. His judgment fell on the city and the temple because of the wrongdoing of the people.
Scripture uses the word "counsel" in two senses, and only one of them can be refused:
Scripture presents God's counsel to us in two distinct ways. First, there is God's mind for us. He gives it for our help and blessing, and man can accept it or reject it. Second, there is what God has determined to do. No one can interfere with it, and God will certainly bring it to pass. It is a great blessing that God stoops to give us His counsel and shows us the way of blessing. It is a very serious matter for those who refuse to listen to what God counsels.
They used God's own title, "the Holy One of Israel," while treating Him with contempt. That title runs right through the book. It is not only a name of judgment:
All through Isaiah He is called "the Holy One of Israel." This title appears in Isaiah twenty-five times. It belongs to the Lord, who deals with His people in judgment and in mercy. Read 1:4; 5:19, 24; 10:20; 12:6... The Holy One of Israel is Jehovah; He is the Redeemer of His people. "Our Redeemer—the LORD of hosts is His name—is the Holy One of Israel" (47:4).
- Counsel offered. God gives His mind to men for their help and blessing, and they may accept it or refuse it. What He has determined to do, no one can stop.
- Counsel despised. This taunt ends a slide: covetousness, then luxury, then excuses for sin, then open contempt for God's judgment.
- Counsel delayed. God does not hurry His counsel. He is patient, not willing that any should perish. The wicked read that patience as proof that nothing is coming.
- Counsel known. They asked to know it, and they did: judgment fell on the city and the temple.
- Counsel repeated. The same voice speaks today in the scoffers who ask, "Where is the promise of his coming?" The Holy One they mock is both Judge and Redeemer.
Woe unto them who call evil good, and good evil; who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and intelligent in their own esteem!
Isaiah 5 pronounces a series of woes over Judah, and this one falls on people whose only measure of wisdom is their own opinion of themselves. The verse raises a plain question: who decides what is true? And what does God do with people who appoint themselves to the job?
This woe is one of a chain running through the chapter, each aimed at a different sin. One commentator names the fault behind this one.
Another writer works down the prophet's list of sinners and comes to a respectable-looking group.
Next he notices those "that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight," and cries woe to them. God cannot stand self-satisfied people, who think their thoughts are good enough for Him.
Self-wisdom does not stay a private opinion. One writer places it right beside the moral confusion of the verse before, and shows where it aims — at God's Word.
Blinded by the god of this world, they called evil good, and good evil; they put darkness for light, and light for darkness (Isa. 5:20). Men thought themselves wiser than God: they were wise and prudent in their own eyes, like those who dare to criticize His Word and put their own thoughts in place of His (Isa. 5:21).
That order matters. One commentator explains how the two woes connect.
The men who do this, who twist the way other people think, pose as the wise and prudent leaders of others. At least they consider themselves to be such. Their teachings are new and progressive, as they would call them. The effect of those teachings on the people who take them in leads on to the sixth woe.
Behind that confused moral vision an enemy is at work. The Christian mind is meant to run the other way.
Satan brings about sin and a hardened conscience. His aim is always to darken the understanding, just as the Christian's aim should always be to judge more and more according to God. The apostle prayed that the Colossians would be filled with the knowledge of His will in all wisdom and spiritual understanding.
Isaiah returns to this theme later. There God passes sentence on self-appointed wisdom: He does not argue with it, He removes it.
Therefore by God's sentence their wisdom should perish: "the wisdom of their wise men will perish, and the understanding of their prudent ones will be hidden." Their efforts to hide from the Lord, or to be independent of Him, are useless. God, after all, remains God, and man is only clay in the hand of the potter.
The opposite of this woe is not ignorance. It is a childlike place before God. One writer sets the self-sufficient next to the babe.
These things were hidden from the wise and the prudent, the self-sufficient religious people, but revealed to babes. They had refused Him, the wisdom of God. They were wise in their own opinion, and blindness was the dreadful result… Only the person who owns his nothingness, who takes his place in weakness at His feet, and is like a babe, can receive these things. Never does the Lord entrust His secrets and His counsels to the wise and prudent.
The reason self-wisdom fails is short and blunt.
Self-confidence is ruin. "Be not wise in your own eyes." They do not see far if they only see self, and that is what is always in our own eyes.
Note: older translations read "prudent in their own sight"; the ESV renders it "shrewd in their own sight."
- The sin. Being wise in your own eyes means thinking you can do without God. It means thinking your own thoughts are good enough for Him.
- The spread. Self-wisdom does not stay private. It criticizes God's Word, puts its own thoughts in place of His, and poses as a guide for others.
- The darkness. Satan works to darken the mind, so good and evil get swapped. The believer's aim is the opposite: to judge according to God.
- The sentence. God does not debate such wisdom. He declares that the wisdom of the wise will perish, for man is clay in the hand of the potter.
- The way back. The Lord entrusts His secrets to babes, not to the self-sufficient. Owning your nothingness at His feet is the only path to real knowledge.
Woe unto them that are mighty for drinking wine, and men valiant to mix strong drink;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
who justify the wicked for a bribe, and turn away the righteousness of the righteous from them!
Isaiah's song about the vineyard gives way to six woes, and this verse closes the last one. It falls on judges who sell their verdicts: they clear the guilty for a payment and strip the innocent of their rights.
The verse before it praises the same men as heroes — at drinking wine. One writer groups them in a single description, friends of the wicked and foes of the righteous, and then gives the reason for the judgment.
The moral corrupters broke down all moral distinction. The wise in their own eyes could do without God. The unjust friends of the wicked, whose heroism was in wine and strong drink, were foes of the righteous. For them there is woe upon woe with utter destruction, "because they have cast away the law of the Lord of hosts, and despised the word of the Holy One of Israel."
The order of the woes is not random. Corrupt courts come last. Before them stand the woe on those who break down moral distinctions, and the woe on those who are wise in their own eyes.
The men who twist how their neighbours think pose as the wise and prudent leaders of others. At least they consider themselves to be such. Others take in their teachings — new and progressive, as they would call them — and the effect of that leads to the sixth woe. Those people go back to their drink and debauchery, and pervert everything that is right in their dealings with others.
A bribe does more than buy a verdict. It blinds the man who takes it, and it marks the man who offers it as wicked too.
A gift given to pervert the course of judgment blinds the eyes. It shows the man who takes it to be wicked, and the man who gives it no less. Taking it in secret, from the fold of a robe, ought to be a signal of danger. No other human eye sees it, but God hates the wrong, and He is not mocked.
The principle reaches further than envelopes of cash, and one writer presses it on readers who would never dream of accepting one.
The law prohibits all forms of bribery. A bribe is an appeal to the feelings of the person who takes it. Where bribery is widespread, justice is almost unknown. "The bribe blinds those whose eyes are open" (New Translation). Let us read this verse in the spirit of it as well as in the letter, for it is possible for self-interest to blind the eyes of a sincere Christian.
Acquitting the guilty is not just bad administration. Scripture puts it and its opposite, condemning the innocent, under the same sentence.
Power can create a world or a universe. It cannot cancel sin. It cannot act as if God were indifferent to sin. It cannot take up the sinner and justify him, or bless him while he is unjustified... If He justifies, it is for righteousness to pronounce it: that is its place. And it is written, "The one who justifies the wicked and the one who condemns the just are both an abomination to the Lord" (Prov. 17:15).
A bought judge only lets the guilty off. One writer shows that God alone can justify a guilty man, and He does it without setting His own righteousness aside.
Who are we to believe in? The God "who justifies the ungodly." Who but God could do that? A human judge could not. He might let the guilty one off, or be merciful to him. But no human judge has the power to justify a guilty criminal. To justify him, he would have to clear him of every charge against him, and if the man was guilty he could not do that. But, blessed be His name, God can, and He does it in a way perfectly consistent with His own perfect righteousness.
- Sequence. Teachers who blur good and evil breed men who pervert everything right in their dealings with others. That is why the sixth woe lands last.
- Bribe. A bribe blinds the taker and marks him as wicked, along with the giver. It works on the feelings, so self-interest can blind a sincere believer too.
- Reversal. Acquitting the guilty and condemning the just are both an abomination to the Lord. God cannot act as if He were indifferent to sin.
- Contrast. No human judge can justify a guilty man. God justifies the ungodly, and He does it in full keeping with His own righteousness.
- Verdict. The ground of the woe is stated plainly: they cast away the law of the Lord and despised His word. Corrupt courts were the symptom. Contempt for God's word was the disease.
Therefore as a tongue of fire devoureth the stubble, and dry grass sinketh down in the flame, their root shall be as rottenness, and their blossom shall go up as dust; for they have rejected the law of Jehovah of hosts, and despised the word of the Holy One of Israel.
Isaiah 5 opens with a song about a vineyard and closes with a storm of judgment. Verse 24 gives the reason. One charge lies behind the fire, the rot and the scattered blossom: God's people had thrown away His law and despised His word.
The charge lands with full weight only when you see how much God had already done for this people.
There was no failure on God's part. He had established Israel in the most favourable position, separated them to Himself, and removed stumbling-blocks. He crowned them with favours, and granted not only protection but every means of blessing. Yet all was in vain. The result was only bad fruit. They, like Adam, broke the covenant. It was the old story over again. Human responsibility ends in total ruin.
Verse 24 does not stand alone. It gathers up the "woes" earlier in the chapter and names their common cause.
Then there are the bold sinners who jeered, inviting the LORD to hurry so that they might see His work. There are the moral corrupters, who broke down every moral distinction. There are the wise in their own eyes, who could do without God. There are the unjust friends of the wicked, whose heroism was in wine and strong drink, and who were enemies of the righteous. For all of these there is woe upon woe with utter destruction, "for they have rejected the law of the LORD of hosts, and have despised the word of the Holy One of Israel."
The earlier woes named the sin but held back the sentence.
After the second woe the chapter says nothing about what the judgment would involve until we reach verse 24. Then verse 24 makes plain the pent-up wrath earned by the last four woes. Verses 26-30 then show how all six woes would bring chastisement on them from outside. The nations that would soon come down on them like a roaring lion were no doubt headed up in mighty Assyria, the great power of those days, whom the Lord called "the rod of My anger" (Isaiah 10:5).
"The law of the LORD of hosts" was not a vague idea. Isaiah's own words prove that a written book of the law existed in his day.
Four witnesses put this beyond doubt: the prophets Isaiah, Micah, Amos and Hosea. They take us back beyond the days of Hezekiah to those of Uzziah and Jeroboam the Second. Three of them name "The Law of the LORD." Two testify that it stood written in a book. All quote enough of that book's contents to identify it with the one we have. So in Isaiah 5:24 we read that they "have rejected the law of the LORD of hosts."
The verse names the offended party twice, and the second title carries the sting. To slight this word is to slight the One who is utterly unlike the corruption described in the chapter.
The name "Holy One of Israel" implies that the God of Israel is completely separated from all evil. He is of purer eyes than to look on evil. This is also what the seraphim express who cry out in front of His throne: "Holy, holy, holy is the LORD of hosts."
The images in the verse are not decorative. Chaff is the useless husk swept off the threshing floor, and Scripture uses it in a fixed way.
The wicked are also compared to chaff, to be burned up with unquenchable fire — eternal punishment.
Verse 24 flows straight into verse 25, and the two verses together show how God deals with a people who reject Him.
"For they have rejected the law of the LORD of hosts, and have despised the word of the Holy One of Israel ... therefore the anger of the LORD was kindled against His people, and He stretched out His hand against them and struck them." God does not strike all at once. He sends partial judgments. Since these do not wake them up, worse judgments follow. But there is always forbearance and mercy on God's part first. What God did at the beginning is the great principle that God recalls to His people. That is why He is just in His judgments.
- Planted. God left nothing undone for His vineyard. He gave Israel the best position, every protection, and every means of blessing. The verdict of verse 24 is fair because His care was total.
- Discarded. They threw away a real, written law that they had and knew. Their sin was not ignorance but contempt for a book in their hands.
- Despised. The word they threw aside was the word of the Holy One of Israel. He is separated from all evil, and seraphim cry "Holy, holy, holy" before His throne.
- Burned. Fire is the picture the verse chooses. Scripture compares the wicked to chaff, burned up with unquenchable fire.
- Struck. God does not empty His anger at once. Partial judgments come first. Mercy runs ahead of every blow. Ignored warnings bring worse.
Therefore is the anger of Jehovah kindled against his people, and he hath stretched out his hand against them and hath smitten them; and the mountains trembled, and their carcases are become as dung in the midst of the streets. For all this his anger is not turned away, and his hand is stretched out still.
This verse gives a cause and a warning. God struck His own people in anger, yet the closing line warns that more was coming. He does not empty His hand in one stroke, and these people had not read the meaning of the first blow.
The word "therefore" ties this blow to a charge laid in the verse before. And this was not God's first move against them.
"They have rejected the law of the LORD of hosts, and have despised the word of the Holy One of Israel. Therefore the anger of the LORD was kindled against His people, and He stretched out His hand against them and struck them" (vv. 24, 25). God does not strike all at once. He sends partial judgments, and when they do not wake up, worse judgments. But God always shows forbearance and mercy first. So He is just in His judgments.
The reason the hand stays out is not in God but in the people. A blow that produces no turning has not finished its work.
God has chastised His people, but this has not yet dealt with their pride: they still trust in themselves. The anger of Jehovah is not yet turned away, and His hand is stretched out still. That is because the people do not turn to Him who smites them, and have not discerned His hand. And until this is seen, there is resistance and a strengthening of self in one's own power.
Darby goes on to show what the people put in place of a real return.
Sometimes the heart admits that the chastening has come because of known evil, and then would just reform itself a little. But the hand of God stays stretched out still, because there is no return to Him who smites — only an attempt to appease God with a certain amount of hypocrisy. The conscience has never dealt directly with God.
This sentence is not a one-off. Isaiah drops it here, breaks off for several chapters, then picks it up again in chapter 9 — and each return lands harder.
In Isaiah 5, woe was pronounced upon them six times, and now we get the hand of God stretched out in wrath four times over — verses 12, 17, 21, and Isaiah 10:4. There seems to be an increase of severity as we go on.
The same hand that struck from inside then signals to armies outside. The rest of the chapter shows what they leave behind.
He had dealt with them already, but the strokes are not exhausted. The avenging nations may be far away, but He would give them the signal, and they would come quickly. … "And if one looks to the land, behold, darkness and distress; and the light is darkened by its clouds." This is the lot of man, and here of Israel in particular, where Christ is not. There is no deliverance, only judgment after judgment on the people and the land.
Commentators read the word "indignation" here as a fixed period, not an endless one. Isaiah himself names the moment it stops.
The prophet shows why God's indignation rose against His people: the idolatry of Israel, and above all the idolatry of their kings. He sends a chastening upon them. But whatever the first effects of that chastening, the evil broke out again with fresh fury, as evil always does, unless it is put away. That is why that terrible word sounds out: "For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still." His wrath burns again and again. Then, in Isaiah 10:25, we find the Lord saying His "indignation shall cease." But how? God uses the Assyrian invader there as the rod of His anger. When He has finished His whole work on Mount Zion and on Jerusalem, the indignation ceases in the destruction of the Assyrian himself, who forgot that he was only a rod in the Lord's hand.
Even while that refrain kept sounding, the prophet had two groups in view.
The righteous receive the glorious promise. The wicked, though their troubles are great and will grow greater, hear the prophet's words sound out their utter ruin: "For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still!" Even the great prophecy, the promise of a Son, could not turn away the Lord's anger, and was not meant to. It gave the righteous a sure word to rest their hope on, a foundation they could build on all through the time of judgment.
- Cause — They rejected the law of the LORD and despised the word of the Holy One. The hand went out against a specific contempt.
- Method — God does not strike all at once. Partial judgments come first, with forbearance and mercy going before them.
- No return — The hand stays out because the people do not turn to Him who smites them. A little reform mixed with hypocrisy is not a return.
- Escalation — The refrain starts here and sounds four more times (9:12, 17, 21; 10:4). Each blow is heavier, and the last calls in nations from far off, leaving darkness over the land.
- End — The indignation has a limit. In Isaiah 10:25 the Lord says it shall cease, and meanwhile the righteous had a promise to build on.
And he will lift up a banner to the nations afar off, and will hiss for one from the end of the earth; and behold, it will come rapidly [and] lightly.
Isaiah 5 ends the song of the vineyard with six woes, and this verse is where the sentence falls. God calls in nations from the far side of the world, and they come at once.
This verse is the last stroke in a rising sequence. One writer traces the chapter from the vineyard song, through the woes, to this closing blow.
Isaiah 5 opens a new prophetic message. Taken alone, it is plainly incomplete. Under "a song of my beloved touching his vineyard" it solemnly sets out the unfaithfulness of the house of Israel, despite all Jehovah's gracious care. It was so blatant that He could appeal to the proudest of them to judge it in their own conscience. Judgment had to follow. So, after six successive woes from verses 8 to 24, Jehovah declares His hand stretched out against them... The rest of the chapter announces an even heavier blow. Distant nations rush swiftly against them and roar, and the land has nothing but darkness — distress.
Another writer reads the chapter as God's government of this world at work on His own people.
Then in Isaiah 5 we have Israel judged as a responsible people in this world, according to the government of God in it. At the close of the chapter Jehovah strikes them from within, and brings enemies on them from outside.
Older translations read "hiss" where the ESV has "whistle." The word is not scorn. Elsewhere in Scripture the same call gathers God's own people.
Scripture often uses the word "hiss" for summoning (see, for example, Isa. 5:26; Isa. 7:18). It teaches here that the Lord, in His own way, will get the attention of His scattered people. He will make His mighty call reach their hearts. At the same time He will create in them a response to His word, before He works out their deliverance.
Another writer describes the sound itself.
"Hiss" is a sharp penetrating sound to call attention, and get immediate response.
These nations are nowhere near Israel's borders. The distance makes no difference.
He had dealt with them already, but the strokes are not exhausted... The avenging nations may be far away. But He would raise the signal to them and whistle for them, as for one far off, and "behold, quickly, speedily they come!" A most graphic picture follows of their energy and promptness, their equipment and fierce determination. No one can find shelter from it or escape.
The chapter never names the invaders. One writer names the empire behind them in Isaiah's own day, and the title God gives it.
And verses 26-30 reveal how all six woes would bring chastisement on them from outside. The nations would soon come down on them like a roaring lion. No doubt they were headed up in the mighty Assyrian of those days, whom the Lord called "the rod of My anger" (Isaiah 10:5).
Older translations call the raised signal a "banner," and the word runs right through Isaiah. This verse is its first appearance; the last ones turn the picture around.
The first mention of it is in Isaiah 5:26; "He will lift up a Banner to the nations." The last mention is in our chapter (Isa. 62:10); "Lift up a Banner for the peoples;" this is in view of the salvation and blessing of the city. So in Isaiah 49:22. God sets up His Banner to the peoples, and they bring the sons and daughters of Israel to Jerusalem.
One more passage says who the banner is.
"There shall be a root of Jesse, standing as a Banner of the peoples." Here we see who the Banner is. The Root of Jesse and of David is our Lord Jesus Christ. He is the Banner of God. He will drive away and destroy the enemies of God. He will gather and bless the people of God. Through Him all nations will be blessed.
- Signal — The raised standard and the whistle are one act: God calling. Older translations read "hiss," a word for summoning, and the call gets an answer at once.
- Summoned — Here He calls foreign armies, headed up in Assyria, whom He names the rod of His anger. Distance is no delay: they come fast.
- Sequence — This is not a stray threat. It follows six woes: God strikes Israel from within, then brings enemies from outside.
- Salvation — This is the first of many banners in Isaiah. God raises the last ones to bring Israel's sons and daughters home.
- Someone — The banner turns out to be a person: the Root of Jesse, Christ Himself. He drives away God's enemies and gathers God's people.
None among them is weary, none stumbleth; they slumber not, nor sleep; none hath the girdle of his loins loosed, nor the thong of his sandals broken;
In the closing scene of Isaiah 5, God whistles for a distant nation, and an army answers that never tires and never sleeps. Why would God call such a force against His own people, and what does this detailed picture show about the way He governs?
The chapter has already pronounced six woes on the people. One writer ties the marching army back to those woes, and names the power God had in view.
After the second woe we get no details of what would be involved until we reach verse 24. Then the pent-up wrath, deserved by the last four woes, comes into the open. And verses 26-30 reveal how all six woes would bring chastisement on them from outside. The nations that would soon descend on them like a roaring lion were doubtless headed up in the mighty Assyrian of those days. The Lord called him "The rod of My anger" (Isaiah 10:5).
God does not need to raise this army; He only has to call it.
He had dealt with them already, but the strokes are not exhausted. "For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still." … The avenging nations may be far away. But He would give the signal to them and the whistle, as for someone far off, and "behold, they shall come with speed swiftly." A most vivid picture follows of their energy and readiness, their equipment and fierce determination. No one can find shelter from them or escape them.
Two small details carry the weight of the verse. The first is the belt around the waist.
The belt is a symbol of strength, and "girding up the loins" means active service. When God gathers the Gentiles to discipline Israel, the belt at their waist will not be loosened (Isa. 5:27). … In the present warfare the Christian is urged to fasten the belt of truth around his waist (Eph. 6:14). Truth is the very thing Satan will most oppose, and the very thing most people tend not to care about.
The second detail is smaller still. It is the strap that held a sandal on the foot.
The fastening, either by strap or ribbon, of the oriental sandal. Mentioned as a thing of the least value, and the untying of which was considered a servant's task. Gen. 14:23; Isa. 5:27; Mark 1:7; Luke 3:16; John 1:27.
Not even that snaps. The judgement arrives with nothing out of place.
One writer reads the invasion as having both a near fulfilment and a far one.
He will bring mighty strangers against them. Nothing can stop their advance, and they will carry the people into captivity. There shall be sorrow and mourning in the land, and the light of their heavens shall be darkened. At first this will be Nebuchadnezzar, and even Sennacherib. But it will be fulfilled still more fully in the nations that come against Jerusalem in the last days. They will overrun and invade all the land, and then capture the city.
Commentators differ on where the picture points. One writer takes the same summons and the unbroken sandal strap as a picture of Israel hurrying home to its own land.
"Hiss" is a sharp, penetrating sound that calls attention and gets an immediate response. The speed of the return shows in this: they never loosen the belt at their waist or untie the strap of their sandals. It is a day-and-night journey, with no sleep or slumber allowed to slow their progress. It is a most vivid and dramatic way of showing how eager the Lord's ancient people are to return to their own land.
- Call. The nations that march in this verse do not act on their own initiative. God gives the signal, and distance is no barrier — the ones "far away" arrive at speed.
- Cause. God answers the six woes of the chapter with discipline from outside. The Assyrian is the rod in His hand.
- Readiness. The belt speaks of strength gathered for active service. The invader never loosens his, and the Christian is urged to fasten on the belt of truth.
- Detail. Even the sandal strap, the cheapest item a person owned, does not break. Nothing about this judgement is left to chance or delayed by accident.
- Reach. Read it first of Nebuchadnezzar and Sennacherib, and then more fully of the nations that come against Jerusalem in the last days. One writer also hears in the same summons the eager, sleepless return of Israel to its land.
their arrows are sharp, and all their bows bent; their horses' hoofs are reckoned as the flint, and their wheels as a whirlwind.
God's answer to a people who had despised His law was not only words but an army, drawn in detail down to its hoofs and wheels. Two questions follow: who moves this war machine, and why are its hoofs like stone?
Chapter 5 has already listed woe after woe. One writer places this army at the end of a longer process.
In general, the present judgment is at the end of chapter 5. They have despised the law and the testimony, the Lord has smitten them, but this would not do, and He has brought the nations upon them.
Another writer ties all the woes to this blow from outside, and names the empire that delivered it.
And verses 26-30 reveal how all six woes would bring chastisement on them from outside. The nations would soon come down on them like a roaring lion. They were no doubt led by the mighty Assyrian of those days, whom the Lord called "the rod of My anger" (Isaiah 10:5).
The verse piles up detail: weapons ready, horses and wheels moving. One writer names the impression it all leaves.
The avenging nations may be far away. But He would give them the signal and the whistle, as for someone far off, and "behold, they shall come with speed swiftly." Then follows a vivid picture of their energy and promptness, their equipment and fierce determination. No one can find shelter from it, and no one can escape.
Flint is hard rock. A dictionary entry on the word shows where else Scripture uses that hardness.
tsor, 'rock.' God made Ezekiel's forehead like a diamond, harder than flint, because Israel was so stubborn. Ezek. 3:9. The horses' hoofs of God's executors of judgement will be like flint. Isa. 5:28.
Catch the phrase "God's executors of judgement." This army's hardness is not its own achievement. It is its assignment.
Isaiah did not invent this threat. One writer shows where the wording came from.
The prophet says in verse 26, "He will lift up an ensign to the nations from far … and, behold, they shall come with speed swiftly." This is a quotation from Deuteronomy 28:49, which says, "The Lord will lift up a nation against you from afar, from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flies."
Older translations read "ensign" or "banner" where the ESV has "signal." So the flint hoofs and whirlwind wheels belong to the swift nation Deuteronomy had already named. The warning was old; only the arrival was new.
Being a tool in God's hand did not excuse the invader's pride. One writer follows the story into a later chapter.
God used Assyria as the rod of His anger to chasten Israel (Isaiah 10:5-6) and other nations. But he was only the instrument in God's hand for carrying out His judgments. Assyria did not understand this, and boasted as if his military campaigns had succeeded by his own power. Therefore the Lord said, "Shall the axe boast against the one who chops with it? … as if the rod should shake itself against those who lift it up."
Commentators differ over whether this whole scene is only invasion. One writer reads the same speed and urgency as a picture of Israel travelling back to their land.
The speed of their return is shown by the belt of their waists not being loosened and the strap of their shoes not being broken or untied. The statement that none of the immigrants should be weary or slumber or sleep reminds one of the time when the Israelites came up out of Egypt.
That reading gains weight when the raised signal is followed through the book.
The first mention of it is in Isaiah 5:26: "He will lift up a Banner to the nations." The last mention is in Isaiah 62:10: "Lift up a Banner for the peoples." That one is in view of the salvation and blessing of the city. So is Isaiah 49:22, where God sets up His Banner to the peoples, and they bring the sons and daughters of Israel to Jerusalem.
- Signal — The army does not summon itself. God raises the signal and whistles, and only then do the arrows and bows arrive.
- Speed — They come fast and fully equipped, and no one can find shelter or escape.
- Flint — Hoofs hard as rock mark this army as God's executors of judgement, not just a strong nation.
- Rod — God can break the instrument He lifts. He punishes the axe that boasts against the hand swinging it.
- Banner — The same signal returns later in Isaiah. There it gathers Israel home and blesses the city.
Their roaring is like a lioness, they roar as the young lions; yea, they growl, and snatch the prey, and carry it away safe, and there is none to deliver;
Isaiah's song of the vineyard ends in a hunt, not in music: God calls in the nations, and they come so fast and so armed that their roar is a lion's growl over a kill. So who are these lions, who let them loose, and is "none can rescue" the final word over God's people?
Isaiah 5 has already pronounced six woes over God's people. The lion in verse 29 is what those woes cost.
After the second woe we hear no details of what it would involve until verse 24. Then the pent-up wrath, earned by the last four woes, becomes plain. And verses 26-30 reveal how all six woes would bring chastisement on them from outside. The nations that would soon come down on them like a roaring lion were no doubt headed up in the mighty Assyrian of that day. The Lord called him "the rod of My anger" (Isaiah 10:5).
The picture closes every exit. Speed, weapons, stamina and hunger are all in place, and the lion carries the kill away.
The avenging nations may be far away. But He would give them the signal and whistle for them, as a man whistles for someone far off, and "behold, they shall come with speed swiftly." A vivid picture follows of their vigour and promptness, their equipment and fierce determination. Nothing can shield anyone from them, and no one can escape… There is no deliverance, only judgement after judgement on the people and the land. Unrelieved darkness rests there.
Kelly draws the wider lesson from that darkness:
This is the lot of man — or rather, here, of Israel — where Christ is not.
The invaders roar as if the victory were their own. But the roaring nation is a tool in God's hand, and the tool does not outlast the job.
God uses the pride and wickedness of evil men to chastise His people. Afterwards He destroys the instrument. The Assyrian, God's rod to strike Israel, glorifies himself against God, who breaks the rod.
This is not a one-off. The same thing appears elsewhere in Scripture.
Here we see what we also see in the book of Habakkuk. God may use an evil nation to chastise His unfaithful people. But He does it only under His strict supervision and control.
Isaiah leaves the roaring nation unnamed here. Commentators see the invader of Isaiah's own century as the first instalment of something larger.
The Assyrian of the past is only a type of their mighty opponent at the end. Then Israel will enter into relations with Jehovah once more, in a living way and for ever. That time is hurrying on, but it has in no sense come yet. Right after it comes the Messiah's open reign of righteousness and peace. Then the earth will be full of the knowledge of Jehovah, as the waters cover the sea. So Isaiah 11 and 12 are the true and bright end of what begins so sadly in Isaiah 5.
"None can rescue" is true of the invasion Isaiah describes here. It is not God's last word about His people. Later in the book God takes up the same picture — prey held by a stronger power — and reverses it.
But Israel's foes are mighty. To mere human reasoning it may seem impossible that the poor, downtrodden Jew will ever get free from the oppressor. Jehovah answers their fears with a promise: "Even the captives of the mighty shall be taken, and the prey of the tyrant be rescued." What is more, God will deal with those who have oppressed His people.
- Cause. The roar of verse 29 is not random violence. It answers six woes already pronounced over God's people. The pent-up wrath those woes earned arrives from outside.
- Instrument. The lion is a rod. The Lord calls the Assyrian "the rod of My anger". He gives the signal and the nations come.
- Grip. The verse describes a grip nobody can break. Nothing shields, no one escapes — only judgement after judgement, and unrelieved darkness.
- Limit. The rod is never out of God's hand. He uses an evil nation to chastise His unfaithful people, but only under strict supervision. Afterwards He breaks the rod that glorified itself against Him.
- Rescue. The Assyrian of the past pictures a greater opponent still to come. Yet the same book that says none can rescue also promises that the prey of the tyrant will be rescued. What begins so sadly in Isaiah 5 ends brightly in Isaiah 11 and 12.
and they shall roar against them in that day like the roaring of the sea. And if one look upon the earth, behold darkness [and] distress, and the light is darkened in the heavens thereof.
The song of the vineyard ends with no harvest and a black sky. An army roars in like the sea, and whoever looks out over the land sees only darkness. Two questions follow: who are these invaders, and is this darkness the last word over God's people?
A man scans the land for relief and finds none. One writer says what that darkness means for Israel:
A vivid picture follows of their strength and speed, their equipment and fierce determination. No one can find shelter from them or escape. These foes will roar against Israel. But they are not yet named... Such is the lot of man, and of Israel here in particular, where Christ is not. There is no deliverance, only judgement after judgement on the people and the land. Unrelieved darkness rests there.
Two details matter. Isaiah does not yet name the enemy. And the darkness marks an absence: Christ is not there.
The armies are not an accident of history. God Himself brings them. Another writer traces who they turn out to be:
He will bring mighty strangers against them, whose progress nothing can stop, who will carry the people into captivity. There shall be sorrow and mourning in the land, and the light of their heavens shall be darkened. At first this will be Nebuchadnezzar, and even Sennacherib. But more fully it will be the nations that come against Jerusalem in the last days. They will overrun and invade the whole land, and then capture the city.
Another writer sees the invaders "headed up in the mighty Assyrian of those days, whom the Lord called, 'The rod of My anger'" (F. B. Hole).
The comparison to the sea is not decoration. One writer explains what the restless sea stands for, and hears its roar in the world today:
The world in which the godly man finds himself is in turmoil and upheaval. The waters roar, and the mountains shake with their swelling. Often in Scripture the sea, in its restlessness, is used as a symbol of the nations in a state of turmoil (Isa. 5:30). Today, can we not hear the roar of the waves as, in every part of the world, we see the nations in a state of upheaval, revolution, and conflict? As a result, the rising violence and growing corruption of men are overthrowing ancient constitutions that have stood for centuries. Forms of government that seemed as stable as the mountains are falling too.
The same writer sets the believer's answer beside the roar: "But, says the Psalmist, 'Therefore will not we fear,' for 'God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble.'"
The darkness is the last stage of a story that began with every advantage. God had done everything for His vineyard and received nothing back:
Nothing was lacking on God's part. But the nation as a whole had turned away from Him, broken the covenant, and completely corrupted their ways... There was no fruit fit for God under the law. Where man stands on the ground of responsibility, there is nothing but failure. Law must take its course, so judgment follows.
The point is not that God's care was thin. It is that human responsibility, tested under the best possible conditions, produced nothing.
Verse 30 leaves the reader in the dark. The chapter breaks off rather than concludes:
Isaiah 5 opens a new prophetic message. It is clearly incomplete if taken alone... The rest of the chapter announces a still heavier blow. Distant nations rush in and roar against them. Nothing is left for the land but darkness and distress, with the light darkened by its clouds. Isaiah 6 clearly interrupts the song, and so do Isaiah 7 to 9:7. Only at Isaiah 9:8 does the lament begun in Isaiah 5 start again.
So the darkness of verse 30 is not Isaiah's last word on Israel. The chapter breaks off, and other messages come in before the lament returns.
- Planted. Nothing was lacking on God's part. He gave His vineyard His law and looked for fruit.
- Wild. Man on the ground of responsibility produces only failure. Law must take its course, so judgment follows.
- Sent. God brings mighty strangers whom nothing can stop: Nebuchadnezzar and Sennacherib first, then the nations that come against Jerusalem in the last days.
- Roaring. The sea pictures nations in turmoil and revolution. That roar overturns what looked as stable as mountains, and it can still be heard today.
- Dark. Look at the land and there is no rescue, only judgment on judgment. That is the lot of a place where Christ is not — and the prophecy stops there rather than ending, taking up the lament again only at Isaiah 9:8.