Hebrews 9:9–10

Hebrews 9:9 · Darby

the which [is] an image for the present time, according to which both gifts and sacrifices, unable to perfect as to conscience him that worshipped, are offered,

The verse pauses the description of the tabernacle to say what the whole arrangement meant. It was a picture for its own time, and its offerings had a fixed limit: they could not settle the worshipper's conscience. So why could animal sacrifices not reach that deep, and what makes a conscience perfect?

A picture, and only for a time

The tabernacle was a teaching picture. Its offerings dealt with outward things, and they came with an end date.

The provisions of the law were admirable as a witness to man's sinfulness and to a coming Redeemer. But they were only surface-level and temporary. They went no further than outward "meats and drinks and various washings." In keeping with that, they touched no deeper needs than "the errors of the people" (verse 7). They were called here "ordinances of flesh imposed until a time of setting right."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The arrangement pictured something, but the picture itself could satisfy no one — neither God nor the worshipper.

Thirdly, these things during their existence were a figure of things to come. The figures, however, could never satisfy God nor meet the need of man. Under such a system God was shut in and man was shut out. The Jewish system could neither open heaven to us nor fit us for heaven.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why the offerings could not reach the conscience

The problem lay in the value of what the worshipper brought. A conscience can never rise higher than the sacrifice it rests on.

The former could never give a perfect conscience, simply because they were imperfect in themselves. It was impossible that the blood of a bull or of a goat could ever give a perfect conscience. It might do for a day, a month, or a year, but no longer. So the conscience of a Jewish worshipper was never perfect. He could never say that his conscience was perfectly purged, because he had not yet reached a perfect sacrifice.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The yearly repetition proved the point in the worshipper's own experience.

Here is a poor Israelite. He brings his sacrifice, lays his hands on it and kills it. He sees the priest take the blood, sprinkle it on the altar, and burn the victim. He sees the smoke rise, and the priest says, Your trespass is forgiven. And yet on the day of atonement those trespasses, and all the others, were mentioned all over again. He had to conclude they were not really forgiven at all. In other words, his conscience was not perfect, he did not yet have perfect assurance of acceptance, or forgiveness.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What "perfect" means here

"Perfect" is not about a flawless character. It describes a person fit to stand before God and stay there.

First, the sacrifices offered under the law could never put those who came to them in the place of constant worshippers. That is clearly what "perfect" means in this passage. They failed both because they were ineffective in themselves and because they had to be repeated... Now note, to be perfected as a worshipper is to have no more conscience of sins. Surely this exalts worship very highly, because worship is not at all the means of our justification, but that for which we are already justified.

Modernised from James L HarrisOriginal wording

This purged conscience is not the same as a good conscience.

The purged conscience is one that, being "once purged", has no more conscience of sins (Hebrews 10:2). It assumes a conscience that has been exercised about its sins. That exercise is then met: the believer learns that the precious blood of Christ cleanses him from all sins, and that he will never come under judgment. A good conscience is a conscience free of offence in practical ways and walk.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Where the ceiling is broken

What the old offerings could not do, one finished work has done. Ease comes because nothing is left for us to do.

No conscience can be at ease before God where anything depends on what the person himself is doing or has to do. Yes, I would say, not even if it now had to depend on what Christ has to do, instead of resting on what He has already done... Christ does not have to enter in again, He has no more sacrifice for sin to offer — no other blood to carry in; for where could any be found of like preciousness? All is done once, and once for all.

Modernised from James L HarrisOriginal wording

The warning in calling it a figure

The tabernacle was a picture. Copying it as a model for worship turns its lesson upside down.

Christendom, instead of seeing in the tabernacle a figure, has used it as a pattern for its religious services. In doing so, it has lost the "good things" the figures speak of. So the mass of people in Christendom have again set up magnificent buildings. They have again railed off one part of those buildings as more holy than the rest. And they have again set up a priestly class distinct from the ordinary people, who perform religious services on their behalf. So Christendom has adopted a system modelled on the Jewish camp. It keeps people at a distance from God and can never make the conscience perfect.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Figure — The tabernacle was a picture with an end date. Its rules touched only outward things, and they lasted only until God set things right.

- Ceiling — A conscience can never rise above its sacrifice. Imperfect blood gives an imperfect conscience, and the yearly repeat proved the forgiveness was never final.

- Perfect — "Perfect" here means fit to stand as a constant worshipper, with no more conscience of sins. It is not the means of justification but the fruit of it.

- Once — There is no ease before God while anything still depends on what we, or even Christ, have yet to do. Rest lies in what is already finished.

- Warning — Treat this picture as a model — special buildings, holier zones, a priestly class — and you rebuild the very distance that could never perfect anyone.

Hebrews 9:10 · Darby

[consisting] only of meats and drinks and divers washings, ordinances of flesh, imposed until [the] time of setting things right.

The verse ends the description of the old tabernacle system by naming what it amounted to and how long it would last. So why could rules given by God never reach the conscience, and what is the "time of reformation" that closed them?

What the ordinances were

The verse gathers the whole system under things that touch the body only.

They were external things. They consisted only of meats and drinks and various washings. An Israelite had to be very careful about what food he ate. The law prescribed everything he ate or drank. All of it had to be clean, or else he was defiled... There was a washing at the basin. There was the sprinkling of blood to sanctify the unclean. It went on the bronze altar too, sometimes on the horns of the altar of incense, and once a year on the mercy seat. These could not make the conscience perfect, or give real peace. They were carnal, or fleshly, ordinances. They dealt with the outward man, and with a relationship to God that was outward only. A man might be a good Israelite, clean by the ritual, and yet be a complete stranger to peace with God, to any sense of His love, or to access into His holy presence.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

"Various washings"

These washings are the "baptisms" the letter mentioned earlier. One dictionary explains what they were, and what they were not.

In Hebrews 6:2 the Hebrew believers were told to leave "the doctrine of baptisms." In Hebrews 9:10 we read of "various baptisms or washings." The words that follow are "imposed until the time of reformation," and that "time" is "Christ being come." So these baptisms were part of the Jewish ritual, which had many washings and bathings. None of them fully signified the baptism of the New Testament, which as the ordinance of entry places the baptised in a new position.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why the conscience stayed unpurged

Verse 9 says the gifts and sacrifices could not perfect the worshipper's conscience. One writer traces that failure to what the offerings were made of.

Judaism's great failure, as the apostle shows, was that it could not really purify the conscience and set the soul at rest in the presence of God. In the tabernacle of old, he says, gifts and sacrifices were offered that "cannot perfect the conscience of the worshiper." Why not? Because they consisted only of "meats and drinks, and various baptisms," or purifications — "carnal ordinances." They were ordinances which could not in their very nature affect the condition of the soul.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Empty in themselves, yet full as pictures

Weak as they were, these rules were not pointless. They were pictures, and that is why they had to end.

Meats and drinks too were only pictures of the food and refreshment found in the sacrifice of Christ — both for God and for the believer. Various washings and carnal ordinances pictured how the truth of Christ is applied to the soul, with cleansing and sustaining power. Such things were pictures, so of course they were temporary. They were imposed only until the time of reformation, when God would set things in proper relationship and perspective, bringing in a change to end all changes.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The time of reformation

When did that time arrive? One writer answers from the very next verse:

Those ordinances were there until the "time of reformation" (verse 10). That term means "setting things right." The time for setting things right has come. Verse 11 turns our thoughts from the carnal ordinances to the work of Christ. There He is, the new High Priest in relation to this new spiritual system, the answer to the parable.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

An expired ritual

If the ordinances had a fixed end date, going back to them now is worse than being out of date.

Nothing is more empty and pointless than a ritual whose time has passed. Verse 10 says this sharply. Things that once carried all the weight of Jehovah's name are, looking back, powerless and empty... But once the time of reformation has arrived, Truth is no longer hidden under figures. It stands out in its own glory and life. Then the former things are no longer truth, nor even a likeness of truth. To approach Him now through such a channel is to come before His presence with a contradiction of the glory of His Christ.

Modernised from Notes and Reflections on the Epistle to the HebrewsOriginal wording

Summary

- Outward — Food rules, drink rules and washings governed the body. A man could keep them all and still be a stranger to peace with God.

- Powerless — The offerings consisted only of these fleshly things, so by their very nature they could not touch the soul.

- Pictorial — They were not meaningless. Meats and drinks pictured the food found in Christ's sacrifice; the washings pictured its cleansing power on the soul.

- Provisional — "Imposed until" fixed a limit. The "time of reformation" means setting everything right, and that time came with Christ, the new High Priest.

- Past — The real thing has come. Going back to the ritual is not old-fashioned devotion but a contradiction of the glory of Christ.