For consider well him who endured so great contradiction from sinners against himself, that ye be not weary, fainting in your minds.
Hebrews 12 has just pointed the reader to Jesus, who ran the whole race of faith before us. Verse 3 turns that into a cure. It asks for one deliberate act of thought, aimed at one danger: giving way inside under constant opposition.
The command here is not a vague call to think about Jesus.
C. H. MackintoshIn Hebrews 12:3 the word is analogisasthe. It occurs only in this place in the entire New Testament. It expresses the idea of comparison or analogy.
That kind of comparison takes time.
G. C. WillisThe writer seems to say, "Consider Christ. Add up His sufferings point by point, going over them again and again. Not the sufferings on the cross only, but all that led up to it."
The commentators use the older word "contradiction" where the ESV has "hostility." Some old copies read "sinners against themselves" instead of "against Himself." That one word changes the weight of the verse. One writer allows the other reading, then shows why the usual one goes deeper.
William KellyThey were sinners against themselves, certainly, as the Sinaitic and Clermont manuscripts read. But the far more solemn fact is that they were "the sinners against Himself," who endured it all in love to win them to God. Who ever met with a people — His own people! — so rebellious? Disciples so fearful and cowardly? Betrayed by one, denied by another, deserted by all the most trusted! How little His people have to weary them in comparison! And why faint in soul, when they see Him on high — their sacrifice and priest, their life, righteousness, and glory?
What makes His example so striking is not that He had no way out. He had every way out, and He used none of them.
C. E. StuartHe had almighty power, which we do not have. He could command the winds and the waves, and they obeyed Him. He cast out demons by His word, and they could not stir a step without His permission. Then men were to Him as creatures that can be crushed as easily as a moth. Yet He held all this almighty power, and still He endured the contradiction of sinners against Himself. He endured it. How valuable the record of His life on earth becomes to us!
This letter has already dealt at length with the cross as the sacrifice for sin. Verse 3 points to another side of it.
J. A. TrenchThe cross, or more exactly "crucifixion," which He endured is not here what He suffered from God for sin. We had no part in that, and "despising the shame" could not be said of it. It is what He had to meet at the close of His life from man's hand, from the sinners of verse 3. It was the contradiction and opposition of every principle of man and his world against Him. Under it His perfection only shone out the brighter.
Weariness comes first; fainting follows. The verse names that order, and gives the cure before the collapse.
Hamilton SmithIf we take the path of faith to run the race set before us, we will surely find we have to meet the perversity of men on every hand. We will meet the contradiction of sinners against Christ. We will even meet the opposition of God's people to sharing His reproach. Continual opposition is very wearying, and when we are wearied, the tendency is to faint and give way. So let us "consider Him," so that we do not faint. Whatever we have to meet, from opposing sinners or failing believers, He has already met it in full measure.
The comparison has a levelling effect.
Samuel RidoutAre you sometimes tempted and discouraged? Do you feel as if your cup of bitterness is a little fuller than your brother's, and your trials a little harder to bear? Look away from your brother's cup to the cup the Lord drank. Are we not ashamed, then, to talk about our little bit of suffering and reproach compared with His?
- Consider — the verb means compare. Set your case beside His, point by point, and the proportion changes.
- Contradiction — it was aimed at Him. His own people rebelled, His disciples were afraid, one betrayed Him, one denied Him, and in the end all left Him.
- Control — He held almighty power the whole time. Men were as fragile as a moth before Him, and still He endured.
- Cross — here it is what He met from man's hand, not what He bore from God for sin; His perfection only shone brighter under it.
- Cure — weariness comes first, fainting follows. Take the cure early: whatever you face, from hostile sinners or failing believers, He has already met in full.
Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, wrestling against sin.
Chapter 12 has just fixed the runner's eyes on Jesus, who endured the cross. Now the writer measures his readers' sufferings against that standard. Their trial is real, but it has not yet reached the limit Christ went to. So what sin were they struggling against, and how is such a word meant to comfort them?
The struggle here is not a believer's inward fight against his own desires. It is not the fight against spiritual powers either. One writer sets the three side by side:
Leslie M. GrantThe struggle against sin here is not the personal struggle of Romans 7. That is the individual fighting to free himself from sinful thoughts and feelings. In that case he must learn not to fight, but to submit to the power and grace of the Lord Jesus, applying the cross of Christ to all that he is in the flesh. Nor is it here the conflict of Ephesians 6, against evil spiritual powers in the heavenly places... Here it is standing firm against men's persecuting efforts to trap our souls in the same sin they prefer to serve. It is a battle, but faith is the principle that overcomes.
For these readers one sin waited at the end of the pressure: giving Christ up to make it stop. That is why the verse names a limit, and sets it so far out:
Samuel Ridout"In your struggle against sin you have not yet resisted to the point of shedding your blood." There is the limit... do not set any other limit. Do not say, I will wait a month, a year, and if this persecution continues, I will have to do something to make it stop... "The sin" here is the one the Hebrews were in special danger of — the one that overshadows every other. It is the sin of denying or giving up Christ.
Another writer reads the warning the same way, adding that death was the point their refusal to fall away had to be carried to:
A. PridhamInstead of promising them relief from their present toil, he shows them how far short they still were of what they might be called on to endure... In a more special sense, it was against the danger of their own apostasy that they had to carry their resistance to the death.
The word "yet" measures their history honestly. They had lost property for Christ. Others in their circle had lost their lives:
An Outline of Sound WordsThe Hebrews, who received this letter, had suffered much. They had gladly accepted the seizing of their goods. But they had not yet been called to die for their faith in Jesus. Stephen had died as a martyr, and so had James the brother of John. Those who received this letter were still alive, and the writer encourages them to look to Jesus as the example for their path of faith.
The previous verse tells the readers to consider Jesus. One writer explains what that word asks of them:
Edward DennettThe word "consider" in this Scripture is a most striking one. It means to draw an analogy, or to make a comparison, between Christ and yourselves. Your sufferings and persecutions may press you almost beyond measure. But compare your circumstances with His. Follow Him in His course, and see Him at last dying as a martyr for righteousness' sake. (That is the aspect of His death presented here.) So take courage and strength from His example: learn from Him to endure, and to be faithful even to death.
Christ's death has two sides, and we can share only one of them. One writer marks the line:
Frederick W. GrantChrist went on to death, and His followers must be prepared to do as He did, suffering with Him as far as men are concerned. He has endured the suffering from God, the suffering that made the Cross what it was for Him. There is no cup of that kind for us at all — no forsaking of God, but the very opposite.
The comparison differs in one more place: the sin each one faced.
J. G. BellettThe cross, in one aspect, was martyrdom. Jesus was as much a martyr at the hand of man as He was a victim at the hand of God. It is as a martyr we see Him here — and as such we are put in company with Him... It was sin in the Pharisees, sin in the crowd, sin in the chief priests, that carried the Lord Jesus to the cross. But He never had a bit of sin in Himself to strive against. It was sin in others.
Having measured their suffering, the writer turns from persecution to training. The same trials now get a second explanation:
C. E. StuartAt this point we are reminded that we, even all Christians, are at school... They had not yet resisted to the point of shedding their blood in the struggle against sin. Stephen and others had done that. But not one of them had. And they had forgotten the appeal that reasoned with them not as children but as sons... It reminded the Hebrews how they stood in relation to God, and why He disciplines them — the love of His heart.
- Measure. The verse is a comparison: put your cup beside Christ's and your suffering shrinks to its true size.
- Battle. The fight here is not inward temptation or unseen powers. It is the pressure of men trying to drag you into their sin.
- Limit. Christ set the only limit at His own blood. No believer may fix an earlier one and quit when persecution outlasts his patience.
- Line. We may follow Him into martyrdom. We can never follow Him into the suffering that made the cross what it was — God never forsakes us.
- Purpose. The same pressure that tests faith is also a Father's schooling of sons, moved by the love of His heart.
And ye have quite forgotten the exhortation which speaks to you as to sons My son, despise not [the] chastening of [the] Lord, nor faint [when] reproved by him;
Just before this, the writer pointed his readers to Jesus and what He endured. Now he turns to words they already knew but had let slip out of mind. Two questions sit at the heart of the verse. Who is God speaking to here? And how should a suffering believer read His hand behind the pain?
These readers knew the exhortation. Their problem was that they had stopped counting on it. That loss changed how they read what was happening to them.
A. PridhamThey no longer counted it one of the special blessings of the better covenant they stood in that God disciplines His people in grace. He does so because of the family relationship that now binds them to Himself in Christ. They had forgotten the exhortation which spoke to them as children. Inwardly they had in practice left the familiar nearness of adoption. As a natural result, they misread the way God was dealing with them. Through lack of faith they had fallen into the serious error of judging God by how His dealings looked rather than by His words.
The exhortation speaks to "sons." One writer draws a careful line between that word and "children."
Julius A. Von PoseckIt is one thing to enjoy by faith your blessed and sure portion and relationship as "children of God," in the sense of John 1:12-13. The true rendering there is "children," not "sons." It is quite another thing to remember and heed the "exhortation, which speaks to you as sons."
The ESV calls it "discipline." Older versions say "chastening." Either word covers more than correction for a fault.
A. J. Pollock"Chastening," however, carries the general thought of discipline and training. It includes punishment, but that is only a part of it, and possibly a small part of it.
The passage sets chastening beside scourging. The two are not the same.
Hamilton SmithThe scourging may be more God's governmental dealing with us, rebuking and correcting us for actual failure. The chastening need not be because of any sin. Its purpose is to develop in us what agrees with the nature of God, so that we may share His holiness.
The verse warns against two opposite reactions. One writer shows what each looks like.
Samuel RidoutWe can despise the chastening of the Lord — we may think it a trifle, and throw it off. A man may say, I don't care for people's opinion — that is nothing to me: he may brave it out, in his own strength. He is "despising" the chastening of the Lord. He does not have to go to God about it. It cannot be a severe chastening that does not bring us to God. On the other hand, some "faint" when He rebukes them. They are overwhelmed, their hands hang down, and they lose heart.
Each warning has its own reason.
J. N. DarbyIt will not be without a cause in me; it will never be without love in God. So I am not to despise it, because there is a cause in me that makes the holy God of love act this way. And I am not to faint, because it is His love that does it. It is correcting a son in whom his Father delights.
Some writers refuse to call this discipline "punishment." They base that on what Christ has already borne.
C. H. MackintoshWe do not like the term "punishment" as applied to the dealings of our loving Father. There is nothing penal, in the strict sense of the word, even in His wise and faithful correction. Christ our blessed Substitute exhausted on our behalf all that was penal. God chastens His children to make them partakers of His holiness, as we learn in Hebrews 12.
Commentators differ here. Pollock allows punishment as one part of chastening. Mackintosh does not like the word at all.
The quotation comes from Proverbs, where Solomon has already set out the purpose that Hebrews takes up.
An Outline of Sound WordsThe Father's discipline may or may not be corrective, but its aim is always to purify us. To chasten is to purify. This has always been God's way with His children, as Solomon wrote in Proverbs 3:11-12. Solomon, like the writer here, sees discipline as both purifying and corrective.
- Forgotten — They knew the words but stopped leaning on them. When the sense of nearness as sons fades, we misread what God is doing.
- Sons — The exhortation speaks to us as family. Discipline flows from that relationship; it does not deny it.
- Trained — "Chastening" means discipline and training as a whole. Correction for a fault is only one part of it, and maybe a small part.
- Two ditches — Despise it, and you brave it out alone without going to God. Faint under it, and your hands hang down. There is a cause in you, and there is love in Him.
- Purified — Nothing penal is left for the believer, because Christ exhausted it. What remains is a Father purifying a son in whom He delights.
for whom [the] Lord loves he chastens, and scourges every son whom he receives.
This verse gives the reason behind every hard thing a believer meets. Love holds the rod in the Father's hand, and it falls on sons, not on strangers. Two questions follow: why love should ever hurt, and why no child of God escapes it.
The first question is who God is dealing with here.
C. StanleyNotice this: God is not dealing with us as sinners again, but as sons. … Now study this whole subject of fatherly chastening. Is not this chastening really perfect in its place, and applied to every son? I thank my Father for all the chastening I have known, for these forty years.
Two wrong responses are possible: shrugging the discipline off, or collapsing under it. This verse answers both.
J. N. DarbyThe Lord chastens those He loves. … The word draws two conclusions from this truth. … It will not be without a cause in me; it will never be without love in God. So I am not to despise it, because there is a cause in me that makes the holy God of love act this way; and I am not to faint, because it is His love that does it. It is a Father correcting a son He delights in.
The English word suggests punishment, but the passage is weighted differently.
F. B. HoleThis passage uses three words: chastening, rebuking, scourging. The last does of course mean a whipping, and the second means a reproof. But the first, though it may sometimes mean a beating, mainly means discipline in the sense of child-training. And note this: each of the other two words appears only once in these verses, while this one appears eight times. This is the main thought of the passage. We ARE children of God, and so we come under His training.
The verse names two things, and commentators distinguish them.
Hamilton SmithThe Apostle speaks of chastening and scourging. The scourging may be more God's governmental dealing in rebuking and correcting for actual failure. The chastening is not necessarily for any sin, but rather to develop in us what is according to the nature of God, so that we may share in His holiness.
The reason behind the discipline is not always the same.
F. B. HoleIn the light of the New Testament, chastening may be sent as repayment, as we see in 1 Corinthians 11:30. But it may not be. In Paul's case — 2 Corinthians 12:7 — the thorn in the flesh was preventive, in case he should be puffed up and fall. Or again, it may be neither repayment nor prevention but education, as Hebrews 12 shows. The Father trains and disciplines His children, and even scourges them. But it is all in pursuit of His goal — "that we may share His holiness."
"Every son whom He receives" leaves no exceptions — even after the warmest welcome.
Julius A. Von PoseckDoes "scourging" look like "receiving"? Or "chastening" like "loving"? Certainly not in any other relationship, but it is exactly what marks a father's love for his son. First, it is true, came the Father's kisses of welcome. Then the BEST robe, then the ring and the sandals. Then the fattened calf, and the music and dancing. And afterwards — the rod. The rod does not taste like the kiss, but the same love that gave the kiss wields the rod.
Sometimes the discipline arrives as hostility from other people. That makes God's hand hard to see.
Samuel RidoutIt is very interesting to notice the character of these chastisements. They are persecution, scorn, hatred, the reproach of man. You say, if God would only lay me on a bed of sickness, I could bear it. If it were God who had done these things — but it is just the wretched malice of man. I cannot see Him in it. Well, faith sees God in it. … We bear these things. However much they seem to come from spite, envy, or hatred, we know they also come from a Father's heart, who permits them for our blessing.
Circumstances are a poor guide to God's mind.
F. B. HoleWorldly prosperity and celebration, even when it is the fruit of God's care behind the scenes, is not always a sign of His approval. And affliction is not a sign of His disapproval. Job's case shows this even more clearly.
- Son, not sinner. The chastening of this verse is family business. God is not dealing with the believer as a sinner again, but as a son.
- Son loved. Love is the cause: there is a reason in us, but never anything but love in God — so neither shrug it off nor sink under it.
- Son trained. The main word means child-training, not just punishment. Scourging answers actual failure. Chastening may simply grow in us what matches God's nature.
- Every son. No child is exempt. The same love that gave the welcome, the robe and the ring later takes up the rod.
- Son shaped. Even hostility from people is a tool the Father permits. It aims at one goal — that we may share His holiness.
Ye endure for chastening, God conducts himself towards you as towards sons; for who is the son that the father chastens not?
These believers were suffering at the hands of people opposed to them. The verse tells them to read that suffering as the training a father gives a son — and asks what it would mean if the training never came.
The verse does not say the discipline might come. It says why the suffering comes at all.
William KellyThe sense is: not for harm but for good, for chastening you endure. It is the sure lot and mark of God's family here on earth. So the challenge follows: what son is there whom a father does not discipline? To be without such dealing, which all have shared in, would point instead to being false sons, not true ones.
The trouble these readers faced came from people who hated them. Yet God takes what those enemies do and uses it as His own discipline.
Edward DennettNotice one special thing here, as this unfolds God's ways with His children. He takes up "the contradiction of sinners" — the opposition and persecution we may meet in the path of faith — and uses them as needed chastisement. This Scripture does not speak of the direct dealing of God's hand. It speaks of the trials and difficulties that come with a believer's path through this world. God still uses them as instruments for our needed chastisement and blessing.
The men who caused their trouble were not the ones in charge of it.
C E StuartWhy did they suffer? Because they were God's sons. Men, the instruments of their sufferings, might seem to be dealing with them as they chose. It was not so. God indeed allowed it. He had His own purposes in it all for the rich blessing of His saints. Behind the hand that struck them was the Father, permitting it in His love to them and for their profit.
The most natural reading of hardship is that God is angry. The verse rules that out by naming the relationship first.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinAs a loving father who loves his children, He chastised them. They were not to forget this — that He speaks to them not as to sinners, but as to sons... God, as Father, permits trials and tribulations to come to believers for their own good. Such experiences are not evidence of divine displeasure, but evidences of sonship.
Enduring is not shrugging the trouble off, and it is not fighting back against it. It is a way of taking it from God.
Leslie M. GrantEnduring here is therefore neither despising nor rebelling, but taking it as from the hand of God. Only in this spirit can we enjoy the privileges that belong to us as sons of our God and Father. Only then do we gain the benefit of His dealings with us... But if someone found no testing of faith after claiming to be a believer, it would show he was not a son of God at all.
The verse rests on something everyone knows about fathers. A man corrects the child who is his. One writer makes the point with a story.
Edward DennettWalking down the street one day, a bishop saw two boys quarrelling. As he watched, he saw that one of the two was mostly to blame. Then a man came running out of a house, seized the boy who was least to blame, and began to punish him. The bishop stepped in and said, "Why do you beat that boy? It is the other who deserves it most." "That may be," the man replied, "but this is my son." So it is; God chastises His children.
Chastening has an aim. It reaches the parts of us that we cannot reach ourselves.
J. N. DarbyGod puts us in the place of children, and we must look at what His thoughts about us are... My will may have to be broken. Tendencies I never knew about may have to be uncovered in me, to humble me... He hates the evil and loves the good, and is breaking us down, subduing the evil, wearing it out. He is bringing us nearer to Himself. God is educating us as children.
- Purpose — the hardship is not aimless: "not for harm but for good, for chastening you endure." It is the sure mark of God's family in this world.
- Proof — the trouble is not God's anger. Trials are "not evidence of divine displeasure, but evidences of sonship."
- Providence — hostile men strike the blow, but God "takes up the contradiction of sinners" and uses it as the correction His children need.
- Posture — the right response is neither despising nor rebelling, but "taking it as from the hand of God." Only then do we gain the benefit of it.
- Product — God breaks our will, uncovers what we never knew was in us, and brings us nearer to Himself: "God is educating us as children."
But if ye are without chastening, of which all have been made partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.
God deals with His people as sons; verse 8 presses the other side of that. If someone never feels the Father's correcting hand, is he in the family at all — and does every believer face discipline?
Older translations use the word "bastards" where the ESV has "illegitimate children." One writer sets out what the verse is saying.
William KellyThe sense is this: you endure it as chastening — not for harm, but for good. It is the unfailing portion and token of God's family here below. Therefore the challenge follows, What son is there whom a father does not chasten? To be without such dealing, which all have shared in, would instead be reason to conclude that you are false sons, not true ones.
The verse says "all have participated." That word "all" leaves no believer out.
A. PridhamThey had received a family token: they had come to know the rod of discipline. None were exempt from this except those who wrongfully claimed the title of children. For it is in the nature of a Father to control His children for their good. Because He loves them, He is not indifferent to their ways.
The contrast is not between good sons and bad sons. It is between a real relationship and one that has no legal standing.
VariousAccording to Hebrews 12:8, a bastard is not a "son." The relationship is abnormal and illegitimate. Such a "child" can only say "father" because he is tolerated.
Everything in us reads correction as a sign of displeasure. One writer answers that with a story, and then with Asaph, a psalm writer puzzled by the same thing.
Edward DennettBishop Fuller has illustrated this truth by an incident. Walking down the street one day, he saw two boys quarrelling, and watching them he saw that one of the two was mostly to blame. Then a man came running out of a house, and grabbing the lad who was least to blame, he began to punish him. The bishop stepped in and said, "Why do you beat that boy? It is the other who deserves it most." "That may be," replied the man, "but this is my son." So it is. God chastises His children… Asaph did not understand this truth, and so says, "I was envious of the arrogant when I saw the prosperity of the wicked. They have no pangs until death; their bodies are fat and sleek. They are not in trouble as others are; they are not stricken like the rest of mankind." But of himself he says, "All the day long I have been stricken and rebuked every morning."
Commentators differ here. One holds that the rod always answers to something real in us that needs it.
Edward DennettGod never chastens or scourges us unless there is something in us that needs it. With this truth in our minds, we shall not complain about our sorrows or trials. Instead we shall at once seek, in the presence of God, to find out what secret sin or evil habit we have let pass unjudged. That is what has made it necessary for God to come in with His rod.
Another writer sees suffering sent to guard us, not only sent because we have sinned.
William KellyFighting against sin in an evil world brings suffering, and that suffering is not in itself chastening. But the two may overlap, and sometimes do. In every case we wrong Him who watches over us in love, if we make light of His hand or complain under it. How often He calls us to suffer in order to guard us from what would grieve the Holy Spirit of God, and not because we have sinned! And it is happy for us when it is so.
The word translated "discipline" covers more than punishment. One writer illustrates that, and names three men God dealt with for three different reasons.
A J PollockThe word "chastening" has a very broad meaning: discipline. There is discipline in an army, but only a very small part of that discipline is punishment. David was chastened because of sin; Job, so that he might learn what he was; and Paul, so that he might be better fitted for God's service. We are not necessarily chastened for failure. God sees certain tendencies in us, and He disciplines us to keep us from what would lead us astray. … Someone is going on well, and God says, "I will help you to go on better."
- Token. Discipline is the family mark — the "unfailing portion and token of God's family here below," not a sign that God means harm.
- All. No one in the family is left out. The only ones outside the rod are those "who wrongfully claimed the title of children."
- Standing. The word denies relationship, not maturity: such a child says "father" only because he is tolerated.
- Proof. The boy who was punished was the man's own son. The wicked whom Asaph envied were the ones with no Father to correct them.
- Cause. Commentators differ. Some see every stroke answering hidden sin. Others see training that guards us before we fail.
Moreover we have had the fathers of our flesh as chasteners, and we reverenced [them]; shall we not much rather be in subjection to the Father of spirits, and live?
The writer moves from God's correction to plain family life. We respected the men who raised us, so how much more should we bow to the Father of spirits — and what is the "life" that follows?
The verse leans on what everyone learns in childhood. One writer shows how far the comparison runs, and where it breaks down in God's favour.
William KellyThe superior dignity of the Father of our spirits over the fathers of our flesh is clear. But no clearer than the unfailing character of His training, and its worthy end. Many an earthly father wavers. Some are clearly unwise and unworthy. None are reliable in everything. Yet we respected them during the "few days" of their authority over us. We did so despite the failures that showed up now and then through weakness. They could not rise above what "seemed good to them," and they were sometimes mistaken. The Father of spirits is not like that. He alone is wise. He is good and does good, acting without error for our advantage, so that we may share His holiness.
The verse sets the "Father of spirits" against our "earthly fathers". Older translations read "fathers of our flesh". The difference is not only in rank but in what each one reaches.
Hamilton SmithOur earthly fathers dealt with the flesh. The Father of spirits deals with us in chastening to form a right spirit within us, so that we may live to Him. To get the full blessing of these dealings we must fully submit to what God allows. By bowing to God in the trial, we keep God between ourselves and the trial. If we rebel and question God's way, the trial will get between us and God. Then our souls are not sustained in life, and we fall into darkness.
Because God works at that level, His aim in our trials goes deeper than our comfort.
F. A. HughesHe is the "Father of spirits" (Hebrews 12:9). It is a comforting thought that God, in His patient chastening, would refine our spirits from the coarse impulses of the flesh. His purpose in this is "that we might be partakers of His holiness."
The short closing phrase is easy to skip. One writer treats it as the whole point of submission, and states the reverse just as plainly.
A. PridhamHe is the Father, not of our flesh, but of our spirits. By an eternal relationship we are the children of His love. Subjection to Him is our life. We came to know we were His sons by the obedience of faith, through the grace of Him who has given us birth. In the same way, our watchful attention to His will stirs the energies of spiritual life into action. To be left alone by Him is to sink into deadly sickness of the spirit. Neglected by the Father, the child soon begins to go wrong.
Another writer describes the same result as the effect discipline is designed to produce.
Scripture QuarterlyDiscipline is for the body, but it has spiritual prosperity in view for the individual, and as a result he lives — that is the effect of subjection to God's healthy discipline.
Correction is not a sign that God has turned away. It rests on the relationship He has put us in.
C. H. MackintoshAs the children of God, we share all the privileges of His house. In fact the discipline of the house is as much a privilege as anything else. God acts in discipline towards us on the ground of the relationship in which He has set us. A father disciplines his children because they are his. If I see a stranger's child doing wrong, I am not called on to correct him. I am not his father. So I know neither the affections nor the responsibilities of that relationship.
Subjection is where the response starts. It is not where it stops.
C. H. MackintoshThere are three different attitudes of heart towards God's chastening: subjection, acceptance and rejoicing. When the will is broken, there is subjection. When we understand the purpose of the chastening, there is calm acceptance. And when our affections are engaged with the Father's heart, there is rejoicing.
The appeal rests on grace. It is aimed at readers in danger of giving up.
J. N. DarbyObserve here the grace that is appealed to. We have seen how much the Hebrews needed warning — their tendency was to fail in the course of faith. The way to prevent this is not to hold back warning. But we must still bring the soul fully into contact with grace. This alone can give strength and courage through confidence in God.
- Relationship first. God corrects us because we are His; a father disciplines his own children, not a stranger's.
- Reach. Earthly fathers dealt with the flesh for a few days, and sometimes got it wrong. The Father of spirits works inside us, without error, to refine our spirits from the coarse impulses of the flesh.
- Response. Bow in the trial and you keep God between yourself and it; rebel, and the trial comes between you and God.
- Result. Subjection to Him is our life. To be left alone by Him is to sink into deadly sickness of spirit.
- Ripening. Subjection is the first step. Understanding brings calm acceptance, and hearts engaged with the Father's heart reach rejoicing.
For they indeed chastened for a few days, as seemed good to them; but he for profit, in order to the partaking of his holiness.
The verse sets two fathers side by side: the ones who raised us and the One who now trains us. Three things separate them: how long their authority lasts, what guides it, and what it aims at.
Our human fathers deserved respect. But there was a ceiling on what they could do. Their rule was short, and their judgment was their own.
William KellyMany an earthly father wavers. Some are plainly unwise and unworthy. None is reliable in absolutely everything. Yet we used to pay them respect during the "short time" of their authoritative training, whatever failures happened now and then through the weakness of the flesh. For they could not rise above what "seemed best to them." They could be mistaken, and sometimes they were. Not so the Father of spirits. He alone is wise. He is good and does good. He acts without error for our advantage, so that we may share His holiness.
A human father goes by what seems right to him. God's training is different, down to the smallest detail.
Leslie M. GrantGod Himself designed this human relationship as a picture of something much higher and spiritual. Correcting a child is absolutely essential for the child's good. Yet it depends on the father's attitude. Whatever seems suitable to him will govern how he trains the child. But God's training is perfection itself: its object is the pure profit of the child, and no detail of it can be a mistake. How good to be in such a hand! Only in this way do we learn to conform to God's own character of holiness, to honestly love what is good, and to hate evil.
Human parents are pulled by other things. God is not.
A. PridhamAn earthly parent is often ruled by instinctive fondness instead of sound love. Even when he means well, his own inherent selfishness frustrates him and blocks his work in a thousand ways. God is not like this. He chastens us for our profit. This is His immediate and undivided object.
The verse does not say God trains us to become holy people. It says we come to share what belongs to God Himself. That turns a demand into a gift.
J. N. DarbyHe delights in us, and He delights in conforming us to Himself. So grace comes in wonderfully and makes us share His nature. It is of what He is that He would have us partakers — not merely partakers of holiness, but of His holiness. He does not say, You must be holy; it does not come out in that form: He communicates the holiness — His own nature. See the contrast between grace and law. Does not God require holiness in His presence? That is true, but that is law. Grace means that He delights to give it.
The New Testament uses more than one word for holiness. Darby points out which one stands here:
J. N. DarbyWe need to distinguish between the words used for holiness and sanctification in the New Testament. One word, hagiōsynē, is the thing itself, the habit. Once — in Hebrews 12:10 — it is hagiotēs, the holiness of God Himself.
God loosens our grip on the things our hearts wrap themselves around.
Edward DennettLike vines, our poor hearts send out tendrils in every direction. They wind themselves around this object and that. Then the Father allows trials or persecutions, or maybe sickness, to come in and snap these ties to objects other than Christ. In these chastenings of His hand He shows us Himself and His love to us. So He seeks to wean us from everything that might hinder our progress, and to draw us more fully to Himself.
Even the hardest things a believer meets can serve this purpose.
A. PridhamThere is almost no limit to the discipline God may use to exercise His children's souls. Physical death may, in His hands, be a way of rescue from something worse. The Lord may chasten this way to save His people from the condemnation of the world (1 Cor. 11:32). But in every case His object is their profit. He will make them partakers of His holiness.
The correction itself proves the relationship.
H. L. RossierWhen a father chastises his child, it is not to kill it, but to form it according to his own character. This is how God deals with us too, "that we may share His holiness" (Heb. 12:10). This is a comforting thought. God acknowledges us as His children when He chastens us. He chastens us precisely because we are His children.
- Cause — sonship. Correction is not a sign that God has turned away; He deals with us this way because we are His children.
- Method — perfect. Human fathers ruled for a short time and acted on what seemed best to them. The Father of spirits acts without error. No detail of His training is a mistake.
- Aim — undivided. Our profit is not one of His motives among several; it is His immediate and single object.
- Gift — His own holiness. He does not merely demand holiness of us; He communicates His own nature. Grace gives what law requires.
- Reach — unlimited. Trials, sickness, loss, even death may serve this end; in every case the aim stays the same — that we share His holiness.
But no chastening at the time seems to be [matter] of joy, but of grief; but afterwards yields [the] peaceful fruit of righteousness to those exercised by it.
Hebrews 12:11 admits something hard and promises something good in one breath: discipline hurts now, and it pays later. But the promise has one condition — the fruit comes only to "those who have been trained by it."
The verse does not soften the experience, and commentators are quick to say why. If correction could be arranged so that it caused no pain, it would stop being correction at all.
Samuel RidoutThe writer goes on to say that "for the moment all discipline seems painful rather than pleasant." Do you know what we all wish for? A kind of discipline that does not hurt — one that might even be a pleasure to go through. But that would be no discipline at all. It has to be painful, or it is not discipline.
That means grief itself is not a failure of faith. What God objects to is a different set of reactions.
A. PridhamRestlessness, or indifference, or despair are all alike sin. Sorrow is not. God expects Christians to call bitter things bitter. Suppose they do. Suppose by faith they see whose hand is giving the grief, and accept the trial as a sign from the Father. Then trouble will produce patience. Patience draws them into deeper dealings with God, and that gives them a fuller experience of Him and of His way.
The promise hangs on a word that means effort, not sitting still. One writer traces it back to its root.
F. B. HoleThe great thing is to be exercised by our troubles. Discipline means trouble. The verse itself says no discipline seems pleasant at the time. And exercise means we turn our troubles into a spiritual gymnasium. The Greek word used here is the one our English word "gymnasium" comes from. Gymnastics for the body have some profit, as 1 Timothy 4:8 tells us. Gymnastics for our spirits bring great spiritual profit. They lead to both holiness and righteousness.
In practice this means asking what the trouble is for, not just waiting for it to pass.
Edward DennettGod wants us to feel the discipline. He wants to produce in us self-judgment and humbling before Him. That is why the blessed result comes only to those the discipline exercises. If His hand upon us produces no exercise of soul, there will be no blessing.
Because the fruit is conditional, the same trouble can end in two opposite places. Suffering by itself guarantees nothing.
A. PridhamThe clearest proof that discipline has done good is that the sufferer is conscious of more peace. But where God's dealings are not recognised by faith, this cannot happen. Endurance on its own, with no stirring of the spirit, only hardens the sufferer and drags him down.
The fruit shows up first in a will that has stopped fighting.
J. N. DarbyGod does not expect us to enjoy these exercises of soul at the time. If they were pleasant, they would not do their work. But afterwards, once the will is broken, they produce the peaceable fruits of righteousness. Pride comes down when a man has to submit to what he never wanted. God also takes a larger and ever more precious place in his thoughts and in his life.
The change shows up in a person's temperament.
Hamilton SmithIf we work through His dealings with us before the Father, hardship will not sour us or make us bitter. It will soften us and mellow us. In the end the character of Christ shows in us, and we bear fruit.
One word in the verse points past the trouble to the result.
J. T. MawsonWise people look ahead to the afterward — the result of the trial. This result does not hang in the balance, the way the outcome of some great battle may hang for hours and days. God guarantees it. We only stand to gain if we are exercised by the trial.
Behind the pain stands a purpose that was thought out in advance.
A. J. PollockWhat God brings on the believer is not just the product of divine goodness. It is the deliberate planning of divine love. However severe the trial, however deep the pain, however hard the test, it only convinces us more of that clear, warm love which makes no mistakes. That love cares so much about God's purpose being worked out in us that it will not shrink back from using means that hurt. For the moment they bring a tear to the eye and make the whole body wince and shake.
- Planned — what reaches the believer is more than goodness. It is love planning on purpose, and that love will use means that make the body wince.
- Painful — correction that does not hurt would not be correction; God means it to be felt, and calling a bitter thing bitter is not sin.
- Exercised — the promise is for those trained by the trouble, who turn it into a gymnasium for the soul. Endurance that never sees God's hand only hardens.
- Afterward — the outcome does not hang in the balance like a battle; the exercised believer only stands to gain.
- Fruit — the will is broken, pride comes down, God fills a larger place, and the person emerges mellowed rather than soured.
Wherefore lift up the hands that hang down, and the failing knees;
The words come right after the passage on God's discipline of His children. They turn a hard subject into a call to get up and keep going. So why does a believer still droop after hearing that suffering is a Father's training? And what puts strength back into slack hands and shaking knees?
The language describes a body that has run out of fuel. One writer sets the beginning of a race beside its end:
F. B. HoleThe Hebrews clearly tended to faint under their troubles. So verse 12, in the light of these facts about God's discipline, calls them to renewed energy in the race. Watch those runners at the start of a marathon. Their arms are lifted firmly at their sides, their step is springy, their knees strong. Now look at them as they near the finish an hour or two later. Most have run themselves out. Their hands hang down and their knees tremble as they doggedly stumble on.
You might expect talk of God's correction to flatten a struggling believer further. Understood rightly, it does the opposite:
F. B. Hole"Therefore lift…" We are to renew our energies precisely because we know what God's discipline is meant to do. We might have imagined that talking to a poor, feeble, stumbling believer about God's discipline would be just the thing to cast him down. In fact, rightly understood, it is just the thing to lift him up. What could be more encouraging? All God's dealings aim at promoting holiness and righteousness. They also aim at keeping us from the sin and the weights that would slow us in the race.
Drooping hands are common. Another writer says they are never reasonable, and gives his reason:
J. G. BellettIn verse 12 we are urged not to let our hands hang down. There is no reason why it should be so. Though you are being disciplined, there is not one single reason why your hands should hang down or your knees be feeble. The Spirit has shown you yourself first in company with Christ, and then with your Father who loves you. Is there any reason why you should travel as if you did not know the road?
Hands and knees have another use. One commentator ties the drooping to prayer:
Hamilton SmithFirst, the apostle says, "Lift up" the listless hands and the feeble knees. If spiritual energy is flagging, then encourage others by lifting up your own hands. May we not apply this to prayer? Writing to Timothy, the apostle says, "I desire then that in every place the men should pray, lifting holy hands" (1 Timothy 2:8). Hands that hang down and knees that are feeble may well speak of hands seldom lifted in prayer and knees seldom bent in prayer. Long ago the prophet said, "Even youths shall faint and be weary, and young men shall fall exhausted; but they who wait for the LORD shall renew their strength" (Isaiah 40:30-31). Are we not too often powerless in public because prayerless in private?
The lifting comes with the next line about straight paths. A tired believer cannot find strength just anywhere:
Frederick W. GrantThere need be no discouragement. They must lift up the hands that hang down and the feeble knees. Along with that, they must make straight paths for their feet, so that even the lame are not turned out of the way, but healed of their lameness. It is only in God's path for us that power is found, whatever the difficulties. The weaker we are, the more urgent our desire should be to walk in the only place where He can be with us. What are all the difficulties then?
Your recovered strength is not a private matter. A courageous walk is itself a message to those who are limping behind:
J. N. DarbyOn the principle of grace, the Hebrews are urged to encourage themselves in the path of faith… They were to walk with such courage that the weak would see their joy and blessing, and feel that this was their own assured portion too. Such joy is always a distinct testimony, and one that triumphs over the enemy. So the weak would receive strength and healing instead of discouragement. As for circumstances, the path of godliness was to be made easy — a well-worn path for weak and lame souls. Weak souls feel the comfort and value of such a path more than stronger ones do.
- Droop — Hanging hands and shaking knees mark a runner who has spent himself. The verse speaks to real exhaustion, not imagined weakness.
- Reason — The drooping has no ground. The Spirit has shown the believer his place with Christ, and a Father whose correction aims at holiness. So the passage on discipline ends in a lift, not a crush.
- Lift — Hands lift and knees bend in prayer. Those who wait for the LORD renew their strength; those prayerless in private end up powerless in public.
- Path — Strength returns only on the straight path God marks out. The weaker you are, the more urgent it is to walk where He can be with you.
- Others — A courageous walk beats a track the lame can follow. Your recovered strength heals them instead of discouraging them.