Now faith is [the] substantiating of things hoped for, [the] conviction of things not seen.
Hebrews 11 opens by telling us what faith does before it lists the people who lived by it. Its two short phrases raise one question: how can what you cannot see be solid now?
Commentators point out what this line is not.
It is not a definition of this principle that the letter gives us at the start of Hebrews 11, but a declaration of its powers and action. Faith realises (gives substance to) that which we hope for, and is a demonstration to the soul of that which we do not see.
Its effects are plain to see. Faith itself is not.
No one can explain the mystery of faith, any more than the mystery of life, or light, or love, or a thousand and one things. God brings these things into existence, and alone knows their secret. Those of us who have faith can mark its effects, its powers, what it feeds on, and what it reaches for. But as to the thing itself, no one knows.
The ESV says "assurance." Older translations say "substance," and some render it "substantiating." Faith takes what God has promised and makes it real in your soul today.
"Faith is the substance," or "the substantiation of things hoped for." It is what makes the "things hoped for" a reality in the present. It is "the evidence," or, better, "the conviction" — what the power of divine truth brings into the soul as a reality, "of things not seen."
This is exactly what shaped Jacob's dying request that his body be carried out of Egypt for burial in the land God had promised.
The promise of God was a reality to their faith, since "Faith is the substantiating of things hoped for." The things hoped for are real, and faith substantiates them, or, makes them real, to us.
The second clause is often misread as a leap in the dark. The opposite is true.
Faith also has that special power of showing us "things not seen." Faith in the living God is not blind. It is the actual opening of the eyes, accepting unquestionable evidence that unseen, spiritual things are real.
Faith also settles where we look.
When wrong exists it is well that we should see it, but if that is all that we see, we easily go wrong ourselves. It is when the eye of faith is fixed on God, that we go right. We are told that, "faith is … the evidence of things not seen." Faith can see what is unseen to the natural eye.
If faith is not sight, what holds it up? Not feeling, not proof, but God's own testimony.
In Scripture, faith itself is simply believing God. It is accepting His word because He says it. It rests not on visible evidence or on reasoning, but on God's authority.
There is a difference between picturing heaven and knowing it is there.
Faith is not imagination. A poet may imagine heaven, as you can see in many poems; but this is mere fiction and does not exist. Faith knows what is real. A real glorified Jesus; a real city, whose builder and maker is God. Faith puts us in living connection with a real, living Lord, who has triumphed over death.
The first readers had Temple worship all around them. Their old friends had a taunt ready.
His old friends say to him, "You are surely a fool. Here is our Temple. The sacrifices go up and the silver trumpets sound. We have the ancient worship God Himself set up, and priests descended straight from Aaron. You can see our religion; you can smell it; you can hear it; we have the real thing. You have got only a little upper room, where your Master gathered His disciples. Now He is gone. Where has He gone? Really you have got nothing, you are running after mere ideas." … A few years after this letter, the Roman armies came and swept the whole shadow system off the map.
Faith is not just certainty about the future. It brings the future into present experience.
Faith gives present confidence in the future we hope for. In the same way it gives proof of things not seen. We look, according to the word and in the Spirit of God, at the things that are not seen and eternal. There is not only certainty but present enjoyment.
- Description, not definition — the verse shows what faith does, not what faith is. The thing itself stays God's secret.
- Word first — faith begins by accepting what God says because He says it, not on visible evidence or reasoning.
- Conviction next — "evidence" means conviction. Faith is not blindness but the opening of the eyes to what is real and unseen.
- Substance now — what you only hope for becomes solid today, so you can live on a promise before you receive it.
- Enjoyment already — faith gives more than certainty about the future; it gives present enjoyment of it. The visible religion their friends boasted in was swept away. What looked like "nothing" is what lasted.
For in [the power of] this the elders have obtained testimony.
This chapter lists the heroes of faith. It opens by naming what they gained: not fame among people, but God's own commendation. Older translations read, "by it the elders obtained a good report." So who are these "elders"? And what won them God's approval?
The word points back to people the first readers knew well. One writer asks what their reputation rested on:
That familiar expression shows he was writing to Hebrew Christians. They could look back on the fathers and call them "the elders," whose history they knew well. "The elders" of the Old Testament had obtained a good report by faith. What was the basis of their reputation? Was it any special worth in themselves? Not in the judgment of God. And faith always looks at things as God looks at them.
The same title belongs to a heavenly company:
"Elders" seems a fitting description for the heavenly redeemed. Hebrews 11 already applies it to the Old Testament saints. Though they obtained witness through faith, they did not receive the promise. God has provided some better thing for us, so that apart from us they should not be made perfect.
The commendation is not a reputation these people built.
Through it also the men of old obtained a good report — of course in God's history of things, not in man's. In Scripture it is easy to see what made these old worthies what they were: faith. How complete the contrast between the same men when faith energized them, and when it was at a low ebb in them!
The verse credits one thing only. That matters, because these lives were far from spotless.
It was not by their works, or by their lives, but by their faith that they obtained a good report. They were men and women with the same passions as ours. Their lives were marred by many a failure, and their works sometimes deserved blame. Still, despite all failure, they were marked by faith in God.
The first readers were Jews who leaned on the law. One writer puts a question to them:
"For by it the elders obtained a good report." Did legal-minded Jews consider this? Rigid law-keeping did not clothe the lives or works of the most outstanding Old Testament saints with such striking beauty. A genuine, active faith in God did.
The "it" of verse 2 points back to verse 1. So what is this faith?
Some people create a problem for themselves by wrongly assuming that we have here a definition of faith. That is not the aim. This is a description of faith's power, range, and effect. In Scripture, faith is believing God. It means accepting His word because He says it — not on visible evidence, not on reasoning, but on God's authority.
This faith was never just an idea in the head:
All through this chapter the writer speaks of faith in a practical way. "By it the elders obtained a good report." In every case he mentions, faith was so real and practical that it marked the man out.
Verse 2 opens what verse 39 closes. So where does this good report leave them now?
In the past they lived by faith. Today they have a good report. In the future they will enjoy the reward when they enter the promised blessings. The blessing of these Old Testament saints will be great. Yet God has provided some "better thing" for the Christian.
- The principle — Faith is believing God. You take His word on His authority alone — not on visible evidence, not on reasoning.
- The people — "The elders" are the fathers of the Old Testament. God honoured them not for any worth of their own, but because they looked at things the way He looks at them.
- The praise — God keeps this record of history, not people. The same men look very different when their faith is at a low ebb.
- The proof — Failure marred their lives, and their works sometimes deserved blame. Faith still won them a good report. Law-keeping never did.
- The prospect — They lived by faith. They hold a good report today. They still wait for the promise. God has provided something better for us, and they will not be made perfect apart from us.
By faith we apprehend that the worlds were framed by [the] word of God, so that that which is seen should not take its origin from things which appear.
The chapter that lists the heroes of faith does not begin with a hero. It begins with the universe. Faith, it says, is how anyone understands where the universe came from.
The verse does not say "by faith we believe." It says we understand. One writer notes how surprising that is. Faith deals with what we cannot see, yet here only faith explains the world we do see.
Verse 3 begins, "Through faith WE understand …" and it sets the things seen in creation before us. This is a very significant statement! In the days of the apostles Christians clearly shared one faith: "the worlds were framed by the Word of God." Is it the faith of all Christians today? We have just seen that faith is "the conviction of things not seen." Now we find that only faith gives us a right understanding of the things we do see.
Older translations read "worlds" where the ESV reads "universe." Writers have asked whether the word means ages or the material world. One argues that the verse's closing words settle it.
The word "worlds" may include ages. But the material world is certainly included in it. It may mean the worlds governed by successive ages. Still, no competent mind can seriously deny that the whole universe is in view. "The worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen" — which would not be true if only an age were meant — "were not made of things which do appear."
The verse does not just say God made the worlds. It says He made them by His word. A word puts a mind into speech.
This is not a mere belief that this present universe was created by God — of course, we believe that. It says, "by the word of God." The word is the expression of the mind and thoughts of God. So by faith we do not merely believe the fact that God made the worlds by His word. We understand that the thoughts and purpose of a divine Person found expression in creation, and that all was not merely the effect of divine power. So in Genesis 1 we read again and again, "And God said." … Chapter 1 of this letter shows us that the Son created all things, and that He is the appointed Heir of all things.
The last clause rules out an old idea: that the stuff of the universe always existed and only took new shapes.
God spoke, and brought things into existence. At the command of the Almighty created things appeared. They did not evolve out of things that already existed. Matter is not eternal. The writer is dealing here with the origin of the universe. He is not describing the earth emerging later out of chaos to be prepared as man's home. We are to believe what God has told us. This is surely reasonable. What creature witnessed the act of creating? What could we know of the origin of created things if we were left to human reason alone? … So we must rest on revelation for the distant past. Will it then be unreasonable to take God's word about the future?
Human theories of origin did not just happen to fail. The subject lies outside what reason can reach.
Here faith is connected with creation. "Nothing can come out of nothing" — that is man's wisdom! The philosopher could never have found out for himself how "the worlds were framed." Reason knows nothing of creation. "By faith we understand," but man's way of accounting for it led to pantheism, atheism, and so on. Men have now gained some knowledge of it from the Bible. Without Scripture it could never be known clearly or with certainty.
What the learned world argues over, a new believer already holds.
What you are left with is the simple fact stated here: "Through faith we understand" the very things the world cannot understand. The world stumbles over them, gropes in darkness, and loses its footing where it once stood firm. All that uncertainty for the world becomes absolute assurance for us. The simplest new believer in Christ knows that the "worlds were framed" by the word of God. "The things which are seen" — the visible world around us, its organised life, everything in it that witnesses to design — "were not made of things that do appear."
- Word. Creation came by God speaking — not power alone, but the mind and purpose of a divine Person put into speech.
- Worlds. Older versions read "worlds" here. Whatever else the word covers, it takes in the visible universe — the closing clause proves it.
- Nothing. What is seen did not come from what was already there. Matter is not eternal; it had a beginning.
- Faith. No creature watched the beginning. Reason cannot reach it. Understanding comes only by believing what God has said.
- Assurance. The youngest believer rests where the world's wisest still stumble. The God we trust for the distant past can be trusted for what is ahead.
By faith Abel offered to God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained testimony of being righteous, God bearing testimony to his gifts, and by it, having died, he yet speaks.
Hebrews 11 opens its record of faith with Abel, whose short story settles the first question every sinner faces: how can anyone approach God? He brought an offering, God accepted it, his brother killed him — and this verse shows what made the difference, and why he still speaks.
(Older translations word parts of this verse differently — "a more excellent sacrifice," "God testifying of his gifts." The writers quoted below use that older wording.)
The two brothers are not presented here as a good man and a bad man. The contrast lies somewhere else.
The emphasis in Abel's faith is not on his personal character, and not on the fruit of his life. It is on the "more excellent sacrifice than Cain." That is what distinguishes the two men. They are not held up to us, one as wicked, and the other as righteous… He receives that witness by what? Not by his works, not by his faithfulness or his character, but by the offering he brought.
Their work did not settle it either. As one writer puts it, Abel's job as a shepherd "did not make his moral state better than Cain's as a farmer. In God's sight there was no difference; they were both sinners." (The Bible Treasury)
Genesis says Abel brought "of the firstborn of his flock and of their fat portions." Older translations read "and of the fat thereof." Those few words carry the weight.
Abel's sacrifice was excellent because of what it admitted: his own place as a sinner before God, under the sentence of death. He did not bring the firstlings of his flock alive. The words that follow show this: "and of the fat thereof." … Abel did in principle what the tax collector did in the story the Lord told in Luke 18:13, and the same happy result followed in both cases.
Faith needs something to hold on to. Abel offered "by faith," and the writers trace what he believed back to God clothing Adam and Eve in animal skins.
It shows us that his offering was an act of faith — the first to be put on record. Now faith lays hold on what God has revealed… Abel understood the meaning of the coats of skins. By his offering he admitted that he was a sinner under the death sentence. He could only come to God on the ground of the death of a victim. Cain had no faith. He ignored this, and approached under false pretences.
The verse is careful about what God bore witness to. It was not Abel himself.
Abel received witness that he was righteous — "God testifying of his gifts." Notice, God did not testify of Abel. If He had, He would have had to testify of his guilt, for Abel was a sinner, as Cain was. But God testified of his gifts. They pointed forward to the Lord Jesus Christ, and because of Him God counted Abel righteous.
Yet the witness given to the gift reached the man who brought it. As one writer notes, "It is not only the sacrifice that God accepts, but Abel who comes with the sacrifice. He receives from God this testimony, that he is righteous." (J. N. Darby)
Abel's certainty rested on God's verdict about his offering. Ours rests on God's verdict about Christ's sacrifice.
If we look anywhere else for evidence that we are righteous — at our feelings, our experiences, or even our faith — we are bound to end up uncertain. God bears no witness to any of these things, because none of them is perfect… God bears His witness to the perfect sacrifice of Christ. We find perfect certainty in God's witness, and here we can safely rest.
The phrase about a dead man speaking is often borrowed for tributes to godly lives. Two small words rule that out.
It is not merely the example, the devotedness, the life of piety. What was it by which Abel speaks? "By it," that is, by the sacrifice which he brought. Abel has been speaking from that day to this. He speaks wherever people faithfully preach Christ's gospel. He says: never approach God without a sacrifice. You can only come to Him through the blood of a Substitute. And so Abel speaks "by it" of the great fundamental truth that redemption is the only remedy for sin.
- Faith first. The verse runs in order: faith, sacrifice, witness, righteousness, speaking. Everything starts with faith — and that is what Cain never had.
- Sacrifice second. Abel's offering admitted that death was the sinner's due, and it pointed to the death of Christ.
- Witness third. God testified to the gift, not the giver — which is why He could declare a guilty man righteous.
- Righteousness fourth. God's verdict was about Abel's standing, not his character. The same verdict now rests on the perfect sacrifice of Christ.
- Speaking last. Faith, sacrifice, witness and righteousness come first — then Abel speaks. He still speaks wherever the gospel is preached: no one may come to God without a sacrifice.
By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him; for before [his] translation he has the testimony that he had pleased God.
By faith Enoch left the world without dying. Genesis says only that God took him; Hebrews expands it. Two questions follow. What does it mean to be "taken up" (older translations say "translated")? And how could a man know, while still on earth, that God was pleased with him?
Scripture uses the word for ordinary transfers too, not only for miracles.
Scripture uses this term to mean a "change of place or status." Abner threatened to move the kingdom from the house of Saul to David, 2 Sam. 3:10. The believer is delivered from the power of darkness and is transferred into the kingdom of God's dear Son, Col. 1:13. Enoch was translated without dying, Heb. 11:5.
Genesis tells the ending in a handful of words.
He was "translated" to God. The brief record of Genesis is that at the end of the 300 years "he was not; for God took him." This is expanded in the New Testament. There we learn that faith was the energy in which Enoch walked with God, and in which at last he was carried into God's presence. After three centuries of walking with God it must have seemed simple and natural when one day "God took him." Enoch exchanged his home on earth for the very home of God Himself.
The chapter puts Enoch straight after Abel, and Kelly compares the two.
Faith does not always take the same shape, though it is the same divine principle working in man by the Spirit of God. So in the next witness we see the power of life, not the sense of death... Enoch looked to the same Messiah Abel did. He knew, as Abel did, that the woman's Seed must be bruised. But he also knew and felt sure that He would bruise the serpent's head. He saw life triumphant over the one who had the power of death. In that faith he walked, and he pleased God well. So his end on earth was not by death like Abel, but by a power of life that was his alone.
That life showed itself first in how he lived, and only then in how he left.
Then the life shows itself in the walk, and the power of that life is that he does not die at all... Enoch is not found, for God took him — death does not touch him at all. The power of death is done away.
Enoch preached judgment to a violent generation. Some read this phrase as a rescue just in time.
Reading verse 5, we cannot help feeling that Enoch's three hundred years of walking with God and his bold witness for God was about to end in violent death at the hands of the sinners before the flood. Just then God stepped in and translated him. They were after him, but before the blow could fall, "he was not; for God took him." God did not step in for Abel, who died a martyr's death. He did step in for Enoch. This man deeply displeased the men of his age, but he pleased God so much that He took him into His presence beyond the reach of his enemies.
Hole offers this as a likely reading, not a certainty.
Enoch knew where he stood with God before he left.
Verse 4 tells us that before Abel was slain he had the testimony that he was righteous. Verse 5 tells us that Enoch before he was translated had the testimony that he pleased God. One was right with God and he knew it. The other was agreeable to God and he knew it. Both knew on divine testimony.
Enoch prophesied judgment and was gone before it fell.
Enoch bore this witness a little before the flood, as Elijah did long after it. Both lived in times of great and growing wickedness. Both were prophets of a judgment that would not sleep. Both were taken on high without dying. Their removal points to the great translation ahead. It will be the portion of all the living saints who remain, when the Lord Himself comes down for them from heaven. They will be caught up together with the dead saints, raised to meet the Lord in the air.
If the same removal is ahead, the same walk belongs to now.
His life, separate from evil, was a testimony to the character of God, and God took him. His faith is connected with his translation, for he lived as one who did not belong to this world, but to another scene suited to God. And should not all this mark those who are awaiting their translation to heaven at any moment? Strictly speaking, the Christian has only one business here: to walk with God, to please God, to obey Him, and glorify Him.
- Walk. Three hundred years with God ended in one more step — from his home to God's.
- Life. Abel's faith owned death; Enoch's showed the power of life, so that death never touched him at all.
- Testimony. Before he went he knew God was pleased with him, and he knew it on divine testimony.
- Rescue. "Was not found" reads to some as a search cut short: God took him beyond the reach of his enemies.
- Hope. What happened to Enoch is held out as the portion of living saints caught up to meet the Lord.
But without faith [it is] impossible to please [him]. For he that draws near to God must believe that he is, and [that] he is a rewarder of them who seek him out.
The line just before says that Enoch pleased God, and this verse explains how: only faith can please Him. It then names two things anyone who comes to God must believe — that He exists, and that He rewards those who seek Him.
Genesis never says that Enoch believed. Commentators show how the writer of Hebrews works back from what Genesis does say.
The account in Genesis says nothing about Enoch's faith, but it tells us twice that he "walked with God." That is what the apostle seems to point to when he says that, before God took Enoch away, "he was commended as having pleased God." From that commendation the apostle argues that Enoch must have had faith. Without faith it is impossible to please God.
The logic runs one way: if Enoch pleased God, he must have had faith. Nothing else could have done it.
Take away real belief in God, and religious activity becomes play-acting. The verse splits into a starting point and an outworking.
Suppose someone does not really believe that God exists. Then his religious approach to God is pure hypocrisy. Faith is a true recognition of God. Nothing less than that can please Him. This is the basic essential. The last part of the verse shows faith at work, diligently seeking God. God will reward that seeking, because He is faithful.
One writer links this verse to what Scripture says about "the flesh" — human nature left to itself:
The flesh never trusts God. Its mind is hostile to Him... So its independence turns out to be hostility toward God. Because it seeks its own will, it does not and cannot submit to His law... "Those who are in the flesh cannot please God." God's delight is in the Man who always sought and did God's will, not His own.
Many people conclude on reflection that some God must be behind everything. That conclusion is not what this verse asks for.
Even in these doubting days, many people cannot explain how everything came to exist without assuming that some sort of God exists somewhere. But that is reason, not faith. Only faith puts us in the presence of the living God. He knows, He sees, He acts, He makes Himself known, and He even rewards those who diligently seek Him.
We do not learn the two halves of this verse the same way. The world around us can teach one; only God can teach the other.
Whoever draws near to God "must believe that He exists." Man ought to know that much from the witness of His works (see Romans 1:19-20). But the second half — "and that He rewards those who seek Him" — a sinner could never know unless God's own gracious word told him.
Talk of God rewarding people can sound like earning. One writer answers that by asking where such wording belongs.
"He rewards those who diligently seek Him." Again, I say it plainly: you would never have found faith described that way in Romans 4. "What legal language!" some would say if they read it in a book. But here it is beautiful. The faith of a believer is a working thing. Will God ever be in debt to any man? No. He pays those who sow generously.
Another writer turns the verse into a personal test. Older translations read "diligently seek Him," and he presses that word. Faith is not one decision left behind in the past:
Faith is not an initial act and done with. Faith is the motive spring of the whole Christian life... Note the word, "diligently"—diligently seek Him. Does that characterize you and me?
The verse also carries a straight word of assurance. God has a history of moving toward people who were genuinely looking for Him.
God never fails an expectant heart... He sent a Philip to the eunuch in the desert of Gaza. He sent a Peter to the centurion, in the town of Caesarea. He sent a Paul to a woman who sold purple cloth, on the edge of Philippi. And He will send a message to whoever reads these lines, if that person is truly seeking God's salvation.
- Faith first. Nothing pleases God without it. Enoch pleased God, so the writer of Hebrews concludes that Enoch had faith.
- Faith recognises. Believing "that He is" means the living God who sees and acts, not a God argued into existence by reasoning.
- Faith is told. Creation can testify that God exists; only His own word tells a sinner that He rewards those who search for Him.
- Faith works. "Diligently" makes faith the driving spring of a whole life, not a single act finished long ago.
- Faith is met. God never fails an expectant heart. He sent Philip, Peter and Paul to people who were searching, and He still sends His message to anyone truly seeking Him.
By faith, Noah, oracularly warned concerning things not yet seen, moved with fear, prepared an ark for the saving of his house; by which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which [is] according to faith.
Noah is the third name in this chapter's roll of faith. God warned him of a flood no one had ever seen. What followed was years of building, a household saved, a world sentenced, and a man named heir of a righteousness he did not yet hold.
Nothing Noah could see backed up the warning. Here faith and sight part company.
The word of God brings His light to shine on everything by which man's heart is deceived. But only faith will be "warned by God" when the things He speaks of are "as yet unseen." Nature goes by what it sees; its senses rule it. Faith goes by the pure word of God — an inestimable treasure in this dark world! This gives stability, whatever outward appearances may be. When God spoke to Noah of coming judgment, there was no sign of it. It was "as yet unseen." But the word of God made it real and present to the heart that could mix that word with faith.
Not every fear is of the same kind.
The verse states plainly that fear moved Noah. The goodness of God does lead to repentance, as Romans 2:4 says. He shows that goodness in His forbearance and patience with guilty man. Yet fear of coming judgment has often acted powerfully too, and Noah's case is an example. It was fear of the right kind. It was not the helpless alarm the rest of that generation no doubt knew when the flood came and swept them all away. It was the fear that sprang from faith in God's warning word.
The fear did not stay inside him. It came out as years of labour, watched by people who saw no reason for it.
Here faith connects with work in the face of judgment. Noah worked because he believed God. The dreadful reality of God's judgment stirred his soul. Light motives did not prompt his labour in building the ark, or his preaching while he did it. "Godly fear" did. God had spoken, and God would make good His word. Only Noah's house was saved; others despised both his long preaching and his amazing labours in building the ark. But the weight of popular opinion was only folly in this case: all was swept away in the flood.
Noah preached during those years. Yet the verse ties his condemning of the world to something else.
He did not condemn the world by rebuking the actions of the wicked. That would be easier, and it would place him on the judgment seat. He condemned the world by his actions, by his life. That is a higher thing, and it reveals the whole spring of his being — faith.
The verdict was not Noah's to pass. God had already announced it, and every day of building agreed with it.
Noah realised that the sentence of doom had gone out from God's lips. He accepted it, and in his turn he condemned the world by building the ark as a refuge from the coming disaster. Every nail, as he drove it home, was a token of salvation for himself and his house, but a token of condemnation for the world.
Genesis already calls Noah righteous, so the closing phrase looks odd — why is he only an heir of righteousness?
Verse 4 has told us that "By faith Abel… was commended as righteous"; that is, God accounted him righteous then and there. He was righteous, not merely an heir of righteousness. Noah too was righteous; we are told so in Genesis 7:1; yet this does not clash with what we are told here. There could be no revelation of "the righteousness which is by faith" until Christ had died and risen again, as we see in Romans 3:21-22 and Philippians 3:9. So this verse views that righteousness as a future thing, and Noah by his faith became heir to it.
Enoch was taken away before the flood. Noah stayed and went through it.
Enoch had warned others, and was himself caught up to heaven, before the flood came and took away all except those in the ark. Noah had a warning from God about things not yet seen. He himself was warned, and moved with godly fear. The godly Jewish remnant will be the same at the end of the age. They pass through that solemn time of divine judgment. They come out to inherit the earth, and the righteousness that is according to faith. The world lacked that righteousness, and so stood condemned. Waiting to believe the prophecy until it came true would have ruined Noah, as it ruined that generation. So it will be with the world again, in a day that is hurrying toward us.
- Warned — God spoke first, about a flood with no visible sign. Faith goes by that word, not by what the senses can confirm.
- Feared — Noah's fear grew out of believing the warning, not out of panic. It drove him toward the refuge.
- Worked — belief became years of labour, despised by everyone outside his own household.
- Condemned — he sentenced the world by building, not by scolding it. Every nail agreed with the verdict God had already spoken.
- Inherited — he came through the judgment, not above it. He came out heir of a righteousness that Christ's death and resurrection would later reveal.
By faith Abraham, being called, obeyed to go out into the place which he was to receive for an inheritance, and went out, not knowing where he was going.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
By faith he sojourned as a stranger in the land of promise as a foreign country, having dwelt in tents with Isaac and Jacob, the heirs with [him] of the same promise;
Hebrews 11 has just shown Abraham leaving home for a place he had never seen; verse 9 shows what he did once he arrived. The surprise is that arriving changed nothing on the outside. God had promised him this land, yet he lived in it like a foreigner, in a tent, alongside Isaac and Jacob.
Obedience brought Abraham to Canaan. Living there took something more:
If faith first obeys, faith also continues. Here is the steady, plodding life of faith. It is not a settling down among earthly comforts, but a pilgrim path, as Abraham's tent bore witness. Mere material, present advantage is no object at all for faith.
He lived there "as in a foreign land" — a guest, not an owner. And this was the very country God had given him:
He was a pilgrim, not a settler in the land. He was as much a pilgrim in the land as before he came there... God's promise of the land brought him out of his own land, out of what stands as a picture of the earth. But in Canaan God raised his eyes to heaven, instead of letting them rest on the world. And this is exactly what the letter to the Hebrews shows us. It shows not only the faith that brought him into the land, but the faith that kept him a stranger there.
You can fold a tent up and carry it away. It was the open confession of a man not yet home. Lot, Abraham's nephew, shows what happens when someone drops that confession:
Notice how verse 9 keeps up the pilgrim and stranger character: living in tents was the mark of a stranger and a pilgrim... Abraham lived in a tent. Lot did too at first, but he did not keep up the pilgrim character. First he pitched his tent towards Sodom, then sat in the gate, and had a house in Sodom. Abraham kept his tent, because he looked for a city. He knew there was such a city. And the Holy Spirit adds, "whose designer and builder is God."
The one piece of Canaan Abraham ever owned was a grave. That is the proof, not the exception:
When he got to this land of promise, what did he find there? He did not have so much as a foot of land he could call his own. It is very significant that the only part he ever owned was a tomb, a burial place. It reminded him that in life he had nothing, but it was also an anticipation of resurrection... His dwelling was in a form that suggested his home was not here.
The three of them shared one promise, and they were sure of it. That certainty showed itself in bold action:
Abraham lived in tents with Isaac and Jacob. That was indeed so. But then, they were heirs together of the promise. Of this they were, in the middle of their pilgrim days, fully persuaded. And so, on fitting occasions, they can act on that full persuasion. They take up the dignities and places the promise warranted, in a way that nothing but such persuasion can account for.
Jacob was the least consistent of the three, yet the verse counts him in:
It is very interesting to see Jacob included in this pilgrim life. Jacob lived only a small part of his life in the land of Canaan. Through his own waywardness, he spent much of it outside his own land. Yet what God sees here is his life of faith in a tent, as well as that of Abraham and Isaac.
Writers apply this to believers now, with one difference. The call today does not move you to another country:
In all this Abraham's history pictures the position of the believer today. It is full of instruction for us. We are not called to leave any particular city or country, nor to come out of our family circles. The heavenly calling that has reached us is more sweeping than this. It involves our being "delivered from the present evil age" (Galatians 1:4)... Our links with the present evil age must be cut. Yet we still live in the same place and the same circumstances as before our conversion.
- Faith continues. The same faith that obeyed the call kept Abraham going afterwards. It was a steady, plodding pilgrim path, not a settling down.
- Faith keeps you a stranger. He was a stranger before he arrived. The striking thing is that he stayed one inside the land God had given him.
- The tent confesses it. A folding home was the outward mark of the pilgrim. Lot traded his for a house in Sodom; Abraham never did.
- The grave holds the claim. The only ground Abraham owned was a burial plot. It proved he owned nothing in life, and it looked ahead to resurrection.
- The promise is shared. Isaac and Jacob were heirs with him and sure of it, free to act on that certainty — even Jacob, who spent much of his life away from the land.
for he waited for the city which has foundations, of which God is [the] artificer and constructor.
Genesis never tells us what was going on inside Abraham while he lived in a tent in the land God had promised him. Hebrews 11 does. He owned no house and no land, and this verse gives the reason: his eye was on a city that God Himself builds.
The verse opens with "for," so it explains what came before. One writer traces what faith did in Abraham once he reached the land.
Faith led him into the land, though it was unnamed and unknown to him. Once he was in it, faith looked to receive it from God another day, while he was content to be a foreigner who did not yet own a foot of it. But faith also learned to wait for a brighter and better scene. For the city here described stands in contrast with all that is earthly or can be shaken and removed. It is the scene of heavenly glory... The word he heard made him look up. He believed, so he did not rush, and he would not be put to shame.
Abraham lived among real cities with real walls. The word "foundations" is not about engineering.
Abraham spent his life outside the cities of men because he had in view the city of God that is yet to be — "a city which has foundations." The point seems plain: the cities of men lack foundations. Their physical foundations may be sound enough, but the right moral foundations are missing. Unless righteousness and love lie at the base, no city can last or endure. Sooner or later such cities decay, or violent upheavals from inside or outside sweep them away.
One writer shows how much hangs on a single word in the original.
In the original it is not "he looked for a city," just some city. It is "he looked for the city" — the well-known one, and there is only one such city. He looked for the city that had the foundations, because they are well-known foundations. There could be only one kind of foundation for a city like that. In Revelation you find it in precious stones, which speak of God glorified in Christ. Christ Himself is the foundation of that heavenly city. His atoning work is the basis on which it rests, as everything else does.
Another writer sets the same point against the tents of verse 9:
As to Hebrews 11:10 — I take the "city" to be very general in contrast with tents (v. 9) — a stranger in the land. But the only city is the heavenly Jerusalem — itself a figure. It is not "a city," but "the city."
The verse gives God two titles. They cover two stages of one work.
He looked for a city that has foundations, and its Architect and Builder is God. He devised the plan, and He carries it out... The mention of "the foundations" brings before us the very city of Revelation, with its twelve jewelled foundations, like the high priest's breastplate. They are the glorious lights and perfections of God's character. A city built on these must last for ever.
Genesis never records God telling Abraham about a city.
This goes beyond anything the Old Testament records about Abraham's expectations. It shows that faith looked further than what God had openly revealed at the time. No one had ever mentioned the heavenly city then. But faith could see that the God who cannot decay would provide what cannot decay, something above everything a person can take in by the senses... So faith wants nothing less than what is wholly God's own work. It will not be disappointed.
The verse is not only about the future. It explains a way of living.
Abraham wanted no place in this world. With his tent and his altar he waited for the city that has foundations, the city God designs and builds. His tent marked him out as a pilgrim and stranger before people. His altar spoke of him as a worshipper before God. Our tent and altar must go together.
- Looked — the verse explains the tent. Abraham stayed a stranger because his eye was on a city that nothing can shake or remove.
- Foundations — men's cities may be well built. Without righteousness and love at the base, they decay or collapse.
- The city — not "a city" but "the city," the only one of its kind. It rests on Christ and His atoning work.
- God — He is both architect and builder: He drew the plan and He carries it out, so the result is entirely His workmanship.
- Waited — faith reached past what God had openly revealed, and it will not be disappointed. Meanwhile tent and altar go together: pilgrim before people, worshipper before God.
By faith also Sarah herself received strength for [the] conception of seed, and [that] beyond a seasonable age; since she counted him faithful who promised.
Hebrews 11:11 lifts Sarah out of the book of Genesis and places her among the heroes of faith. When God promised her a son, the story says she laughed. It ties three things together: a body past childbearing, strength that comes anyway, and one reason for it all. She counted God faithful.
Read the Old Testament account of Sarah and you find no obvious faith at all. One writer draws attention to how unlikely a candidate she was for this list:
It is only in this chapter that we find any mention of Sarah's faith. You look in vain in the Old Testament story for evidence of faith on her part. How good it is to remember that God's eye can detect what we cannot! ... She laughed; and when the Lord spoke to her, she denied it. So the two things that marked her at that time were unbelief and untruthfulness. This seems the least promising soil for any plant of faith to grow in. Yet God could see there the elements of a faith that in His sight was of great price.
Scripture does not just pass over her failures. It leaves them out, and that omission says something about God:
All this makes the grace of God stand out, and it cheers us. God has forgotten her early failures. He records only the later triumph here. What clearer proof could there be that He loves to speak well of His own!
Something changed between the laugh and the birth. Commentators trace the turn to the moment God exposed her — the rebuke did not crush her faith; it started it.
A rebuke of her unbelief had to awaken her faith (Gen. 18). The Lord reproved her. She was afraid in the presence of the One who searched her thoughts. Out of that fear grew a confidence that trusted God to be true to His name. Faith cannot act until the heart first sets aside its own reasoning. ... Sarah judged Him faithful who had promised, once her heart was emptied of self.
What changed her was not an experience but a word God spoke. Another writer puts it plainly:
The plain word of God given to her changed her unbelief into genuine faith, and that faith bore fruit. To take God's word deeply to heart is the very essence of faith.
Notice what the verse says faith obtained: not insight, not courage, but strength. That matters for anyone who has tried to obey God with no strength left:
Faith here connects with the receiving of strength. A step of obedience to God is admirable. A life of steady continuance is better still. But without the supply of God's power, neither is possible. Faith finds this too. It completes a series of seven beautiful products of faith, basic to all godly character: 1. Wisdom (v. 3); 2. Worship (v. 4); 3. Walk (v. 5); 4. Work (v. 7); 5. Obedience (v. 8); 6. Continuance (v. 9); 7. Strength (v. 11).
Sarah's case goes past hard circumstances into the plainly impossible. That is the point.
In Sarah we learn more. Faith looks to God when difficulties press hard. It also trusts God when nature makes a thing impossible. She did not look at the ordinary way of having a son. She did not ask, "How can this be?" Her confidence was in God. He would keep His own word in His own way. ... He brings strength out of weakness and life out of death.
The verse gives its own explanation. It rests on the character of the One who spoke, not on the odds.
This is a fine reason to exercise faith. With her the question was not, "Can it be?" but, "He has said it, so it shall be." She rested on this alone — the word of her God. For who before her had become a mother at ninety?
One writer measures the outcome against what Sarah herself expected:
Here is fruit beyond counting, far past the limits of Sarah's own hopes. Natural hope was dead, so that long before this she had given up any such expectation. ... The fruit of faith's submission is far greater than it appears at the time, or for years afterward. Only eternity will reveal it.
Ridout turns it on the reader:
If God rewarded Sarah's feeble faith, why not yours?
- Seen — God saw faith in Sarah where the story records only unbelief and a denial. He notices what no reader could.
- Emptied — His rebuke exposed her, and out of that fear grew confidence. Faith acts only after the heart sets its own reasoning aside.
- Strengthened — faith's gift here is power. Obedience and endurance are impossible without God's supply.
- Impossible — she did not ask how God would do it. She trusted Him to keep His word His own way. He brings life out of death.
- Multiplied — the fruit ran far past anything she hoped for, and most of it only eternity will show.
Wherefore also there have been born of one, and that of one become dead, even as the stars of heaven in multitude, and as the countless sand which [is] by the sea shore.
This verse closes Abraham and Sarah's story: one man, past all hope of children, became the head of a family beyond counting. It raises two questions — do God's promises depend on human ability at all, and who are the stars and the sand?
The verse describes the father in a way that makes a family seem impossible. One writer sees in this God's usual way of working:
God secures a great company of people according to His purpose, but does so in His own way, from one "as good as dead". As so often in the ways of God, He carries out His plans by vessels of weakness in circumstances that seem hopeless. He brings strength out of weakness, food out of the eater, and life out of death. And from one as good as dead He brings a people "as many as the stars of heaven." "Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord."
The wording piles the difficulty on both sides, and age makes it worse:
Here faith wins a fresh victory. It overcame utter weakness, made worse by the passing of years far beyond the natural age. The weakness lay on both sides. Scripture names the mother first, and then describes the father in a way that heightens the wonder of such an overflowing family from one as good as dead.
If the man was as good as dead, the numbers had to come from somewhere else. One writer sets what Abraham could have looked at beside what he did look at:
Suppose Abraham had looked up into the sky, sprinkled with countless stars. Then suppose he looked at "his own body, which was as good as dead." How could he ever grasp the idea of a family as many as those stars? Impossible. But he did not look at his own body; he looked at the resurrection power of God. That was the power which would produce the family. So we can see that the stars of heaven and the sand on the seashore are only feeble pictures. What natural object could show the effect of a power that raises the dead?
The verse gives two comparisons, not one. Writers read them as two lines of blessing:
His children were to be as the stars — that is, the heavenly family, those who inherit his faith, as shown in Romans 4:16, which includes every believer. They were also to be as the sand on the seashore — that is, the earthly family. The sea (the Gentile world) may beat upon them, throw up mire and dirt on them, and cover them for a time. But it can never dissolve them or absorb them.
Commentators differ over the sand. Some read it of Israel, others of Israel together with the nations. On the stars they agree, and one writer applies that side to Christians:
Believers in Christ, as children of Abraham, get the heavenly side of the promise — "stars of the heavens"; Israel (and with them the nations) get the earthly side — "sand of the seashore" (Heb. 11:12).
The family began by promise, not by natural strength. Its survival has run the same way:
If ever a people passed through difficulties and dangers, distresses and destructions planned to defeat the promise of God, it was the Jews. That holds even on the smaller question of their numbers. Everyone knows how nations great and small, near and far, have set their policy against them. Again and again through the ages they have tried to cut them off from being a people. Rome took away their place and scattered them as captives over the earth. Even so, it could not put an end to their nation... Yet scattered in this strange way, they are perhaps as numerous as ever.
The words "as good as dead" are not left in the past. One writer turns them on the reader:
Long ago, Abraham received the promised son by God's intervention alone. In himself, Abraham was "as good as dead". In the same way, a sinner can no more justify himself from guilt before God by his own efforts than a dead man could. As far as doing anything to justify ourselves, we are "as good as dead." We are left with nothing but the work of Another — the work of Christ.
- From one. The whole countless family traces back to one man, as good as dead. The numbers prove the source was not in him.
- From death. Abraham measured the promise by God's power to raise the dead, not by his own body. Next to that power, stars and sand are weak pictures.
- From weakness. God works this way again and again: strength out of weakness, life out of death, a great company out of a hopeless case.
- Into two families. The stars picture the heavenly side of the promise, the sand the earthly. Commentators differ on whether the sand means Israel alone, or Israel with the nations.
- Onto you. When it comes to justifying yourself, you are as good as dead too. So the blessing must come from Another, just as it did for Abraham.
All these died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them from afar off and embraced [them], and confessed that they were strangers and sojourners on the earth.
Hebrews 11 pauses its roll-call to sum up how the patriarchs finished: they died still waiting. So how can a life count as a success when the promise never arrived?
Death here is not faith's defeat but its final act. Commentators point out that the wording is closer to "died according to faith."
Even when Abraham reached Canaan he had not reached the object of faith. He was as much a pilgrim in the land as he was on the journey to it. His whole life was a pilgrimage. He never owned what God had promised him... "These all died in faith," or, as the word is, "died according to faith." They died in line with what faith had laid hold of. By faith they saw the promises connected with the inheritance, but they did not receive them. Nature grew feeble. Its powers decayed, and they were laid in the grave. But they died in faith, clinging to the promises still far off — convinced of them, so that there was no uncertainty.
Their care over graves in Canaan was not sentiment. It was a claim on land God had promised them but they never owned.
The history strikingly illustrates this. They valued their dead bodies and the burial places that held them. While they lived, they were content to live in Canaan without owning so much as a foot of it. But "they died in faith." God's promise had given that land, that very land, to them, though they themselves would be gathered to their fathers (Gen. 15). This was the warrant for their dying in faith, in the sure and certain hope of a resurrection to enjoy it.
The verse moves through four steps of faith, and the last one is public.
Faith sees death as only a necessary step toward the fulfilment of the promise, so the patriarchs stayed calm and quiet in the face of death. First in our verse we see faith's long sight. Second, its firm, unshaken persuasion. Third, its embracing with the whole soul the preciousness of the truth of God. Fourth, its unhesitating confession before the world that earth is only a foreign land of pilgrimage. How full, real, and precious such a character is! Who would trade it for all the wealth, pleasure, power and popularity the world may offer for a brief span of years?
Some translations read "embraced" where the ESV has "greeted." The word points to affection, not just agreement. Bellett then asks what made these people strangers in the first place.
The first thing to do with a promise is to take hold of it — then to exercise faith about it — and then to receive it by the heart. They "embraced" them. Their hearts hugged them. How far has my heart hugged the promises?... But surely the closer we hug them the more blessed we will be as we consent to be strangers and pilgrims in this world. Did they speak of being strangers because they had left Mesopotamia? No; but because they had not reached heaven.
The ESV has "strangers and exiles"; the writers below quote the verse as "strangers and pilgrims." The pair is not repetition. Each word says something different about where a believer stands.
A fugitive is a man who has fled from home. A vagabond is a man who has no home. A stranger is a man who is absent from home. A pilgrim is a man who is on his way home.
Abraham's daily habits showed both words in action:
In Haran, where Abraham was delayed for a time, we read he "dwelt there." But once he arrived in the land, we read he "pitched his tent," as one who had no fixed dwelling place. What is more, we read that he "passed through the land." As a stranger he had only a tent in this world. As a pilgrim he was passing through to another world.
Commentators differ over the clause "and were persuaded of them." The ESV leaves it out. Some writers rest weight on it; others treat it as a later addition.
And so these all died in accordance with faith, just as they had lived. They looked forward to Messiah's day, when the promises would be made good. The addition of "and were persuaded" in the Received Text has very little support, and that support counts for nothing... It really weakens the truth. But the practical result is as weighty as it is undeniable: they confessed that they were strangers and sojourners on the earth.
- Saw — faith's long sight looked past what was visible and took in promises still far off. Death did not interrupt that sight.
- Welcomed — from far off they greeted the promises, still looking ahead to Messiah's day.
- Embraced — they did not just believe the promise; they loved it. Hearts that hugged it held the world loosely.
- Confessed — a stranger is away from home, a pilgrim is heading home; tents and burial plots said both out loud.
- Died — they died as they had lived, according to faith. They still owned nothing, and were still sure of a resurrection to enjoy it.
For they who say such things shew clearly that they seek [their] country.
Hebrews 11 has just described people who died still waiting for what God promised, and who called themselves foreigners on the earth. Verse 14 draws the conclusion: talk like that tells the world you are looking for a home somewhere else.
Older translations read "declare plainly" here, where the ESV has "make it clear." The declaration is not mainly a speech. One writer reads the phrase as the whole shape of a life, and points to Christ as the clearest example.
Notice that expression, "they declare it plainly." It is not that they always talked about it. The pilgrim's dress is our best witness. Not the clothes we wear, of course, but the whole pilgrim character. Did anyone ever question that the Lord Jesus was a stranger here? that He was not seeking wealth or a place here?... People can tell when a man is heavenly. They sense it when his character, his conversation, his whole life breathes an air that does not belong to earth... This is not something you can get by imitation. It comes by keeping company in spirit with Christ.
This is why the verse treats such people as evidence. Accepting the place of a stranger is what turns a believer into a public witness.
When we accept the path of the stranger, we will become witnesses for God on the earth... The man who declares plainly as a witness for God is the man who answers the call of God.
Older translations say they "seek a country." The homeland they wanted was not even the land God had promised them.
Even the land of promise was not their home. Still less was Chaldea, the country Abraham left at God's word. They looked higher — to heaven. Life and death alike bore witness that they were at home nowhere on earth. They lived in tents as pilgrims. They were strangers in the land of promise, a land not their own — yet theirs in a hope that puts no one to shame. All along they declared plainly that they were looking for a fatherland on high.
Abraham left his home country, reached the land God had promised him, and still would not settle in it. The tent he lived in said what his words said.
He set out "not knowing where he was going." He reached the land at last, the land "which he was to receive as an inheritance." Yet he lived there "as in a foreign land, living in tents with Isaac and Jacob, heirs with him of the same promise" (Heb. 11:8-10). In these words the Spirit points out that he left the glories of Ur for the land of promise, and then never enjoyed what he set out to have. He gave up any immediate or personal hold on it. As Genesis shows, he was content with a tent and an altar. So he declared himself still to be seeking a country.
Such a declaration could sound like a complaint about the present. One writer says the feeling pointed forward, not back.
Their sense of being strangers on earth did not come from regrets, but from hopes. They were dissatisfied with the present thing, not because of what was past but because of what was to come. The scene around them was a wilderness because of the power over them of the scene ahead, not of the one behind them.
Everyone admits in the end that life on earth is short. The difference is when a person admits it, and whether he says it freely.
Those who freely call themselves pilgrims show plainly that they are done with earth (verse 14). People admit late, only when they are forced to die, that human life is nothing but a journey full of change. They own up to a shared emptiness, and they do it unwillingly. But God's anointed ones never settled on the earth. They wandered all their days. They knew that flesh and blood could never enter the place where their hopes rested.
One writer turns the same confession into a test for the believer today.
The believer is "not of the world." His home and citizenship are in heaven. His walk down here on the earth should show a clear awareness, and a clear confession, that he "seeks a country" (Heb. 11:14). This is of the greatest importance.
- Confess — Calling yourself a stranger on earth is more than admitting that life is short. It is a claim to belong somewhere else.
- Declare — You make most of this claim without words. Your character, your conversation and your whole way of living carry the message.
- Seek — They wanted a homeland, and even the promised land was not it. Abraham and his family looked higher, to heaven.
- Renounce — Abraham's tent was his sermon. He reached the land and still refused to own it, and that refusal declared him a seeker.
- Hope — The pilgrim looks forward in desire, not backward in regret. He is done with earth by choice, not because death forced it out of him.
And if they had called to mind that from whence they went out, they had had opportunity to have returned;
Hebrews 11 describes people of faith who lived as strangers, looking for a homeland. So why did they never go back to the country they had left, when the way home lay open?
Nothing forced these travellers to stay. The way back was open.
Had those saints of old been mindful of the country they had left, says the apostle, they might have returned. There was no constraint or necessity laid upon them. Abraham could have gone back to Mesopotamia, or to Haran, where he had stayed for a time. He could have even continued in the land of Egypt, where, in unbelief, he went for a season. But the faith that had caused him to hear the word of God made him continue looking for a better country.
Nor was there any hostility barring the journey. Neighbours would have welcomed the decision.
He was the stranger to the end. He might have returned to Mesopotamia. He had not forgotten the road, as we noticed before; and the constant respect and friendliness of all his neighbours proved that there was no enemy to hinder the journey. But the call of God had fixed his heart, and he looked only where it led him.
The ESV says "thinking of that land"; older translations say "mindful." Either way, the danger starts in the mind, long before it reaches the road.
The record in Hebrews 11 does not hide from us that the old land of Mesopotamia had attractions. They might well have pulled hard at Abraham. If he had let his mind keep dwelling on the old place he came from, its fascination might have grown. Then his heart would have turned that way, and his feet might soon have followed. It would have been easy: he "would have had opportunity to return."
God leaves the way back unguarded on purpose. The open door is the test.
The enemy always has a side road open to the man of faith. He had an Egypt for Abraham, and now he has the world, in all its varied forms, for us... It is the opportunity to return that proves the genuine fixedness of purpose to go forward. The Lord leaves His people free, in order that they may "declare plainly that they seek a country." This is what glorifies God. It would count for nothing if we were forced, as with bit and bridle, to go from earth to heaven. But when, through grace, we freely give up the things of earth to seek the things above, that is to the glory of God. It shows that what He has to give is far more attractive than this present world.
One writer turns the question on the reader.
"They would have had opportunity to return": that is, where faith is exercised and put to the test. You who have known the Lord some time have had opportunity to return — how has it been with you? A stone left on the ground gradually sinks in. Present things constantly tend to press down the affections — not open sin, but duties. Nothing is a greater snare than duties. We have one duty, that is to serve Christ.
Why are believers left waiting here on earth? There is a purpose in it.
He does not put us actually into heaven, but leaves us here to try our affections. He puts us to the test. The Lord must have a heavenly people, as well as a heavenly place for them. He exercises our hearts, but does not yet put us in actual possession of the heavenly things... Satan tries to settle us where God has made us strangers. The world has rejected Christ, and Satan wants us to be satisfied with it for our portion.
What kept them going was not disappointment with the past.
Their sense of being strangers on earth did not arise from regrets, but from hopes. They were dissatisfied with the present thing, not because of what was past but because of what was to come. The scene around them was a wilderness because of the power of the scene ahead of them, not the scene behind them.
The same open door also exposes faith that was only talk. One writer sees this in the story of Ruth, where Naomi tells her two daughters-in-law to go back home.
Both Ruth and Orpah make a profession of devotedness to Naomi... But, as ever, profession is put to the test. Naomi says, "Go, each return to her mother's house." They are given opportunity to return. This will bring to light whether the thought of their minds agrees with their outward profession. If they are "mindful" of that country from which they came out, they have opportunity to return (Heb. 11:15). At once the mind of Orpah is revealed. Her heart clings to the land of her birth. Ruth, as we shall see, desires "a better country."
Applied to the gospel, the same test stands.
One who professes faith in Christ, if he prefers his former sins to a path of faith and the truth of God's Word, may return to his folly again; but this would only prove that he had never in actual faith embraced the promises of God.
- Open — nothing forced the pilgrims to stay; the road back was there whenever they wanted it.
- Mindful — the return begins in the mind that dwells on the old place; the heart turns next, and the feet last.
- Tested — God leaves the exit unlocked, so that staying is a choice, and a choice that glorifies Him.
- Delayed — He does not place us in heaven at once. He leaves us here to try our affections, and to form a heavenly people for a heavenly place.
- Revealed — the open road exposes an Orpah and confirms a Ruth. What holds the pilgrim is not regret behind, but hope ahead.
but now they seek a better, that is, a heavenly; wherefore God is not ashamed of them, to be called their God; for he has prepared for them a city.
Hebrews 11 has just said that Abraham and his family could have gone back to the country they left, and did not. Verse 16 explains why they stayed on the road. They wanted something better, and God answered that desire with a title and a city.
Nothing in Genesis promised them heaven. Their longing reached past what God had publicly promised.
God kept Abraham and others in the path of faith and pilgrimage, because they had set their hearts on something better than all they had left. They desired "a better country, that is, a heavenly one." This is a remarkable statement. As far as Genesis is concerned, the record is that God called him to a place on earth: it was "to the land that I will show you" (Gen. 12:1)... God's public call to Abraham was an earthly one. Yet he became aware that God had heavenly things in reserve, and on those things he set his heart.
The verse hinges on the word "therefore." It points back to something specific.
"Therefore," we read; "therefore God is not ashamed." And when we turn to the context to find what it points back to, we find it is the faith which led Abraham and others to the pilgrim life. They had set their desires on the heavenly city that was yet to come. They gave up present and earthly things in view of the coming things of heaven. God is not ashamed to be known as the God of such men as these.
Their failures are not hidden here. They are simply not what decided the matter.
Of men whose lives show these marks we read, "God is not ashamed to be called their God." In the details of their lives there were many failures, and much they were no doubt ashamed of. But the great governing principles of their lives, which moved them and gave character to their walk, were such that God was not ashamed to own them and to be called their God.
When God calls Himself "the God of Abraham," He lets His reputation rest on a man. One writer weighs that against the case of Lot.
He identifies Himself with them, as the apostle shows us, because of the practical faith they had in Him. That faith showed itself in a life of pilgrimage, in obedience to His call. God is not ashamed to link Himself with those whose faith in Him gave Him so good a character. If He had called Himself the God of Lot, what would Lot's conduct have led men to suppose God to be? But God shows His own character by calling Himself the God of Abraham, despite Abraham's failures.
Their desire matched God's own mind. That agreement is what drew Him close.
They are strangers in the land of promise, and they do not enjoy the fulfilment of promises here below. So they wait for more excellent things — things which God prepares on high for those who love Him. They are in unison with God in His own thoughts. Their desires, through grace, answer to the things He takes delight in. So they are the objects of His special regard. He is not ashamed to be called their God.
The verse ends with what God did about their desire.
For such God has prepared a city, and in that city all that was of God in their lives will have a glorious answer.
Was the city Abraham waited for the Christian church? One writer says no.
It could not be the New Testament Church that Abraham looked for, because that was as yet entirely hidden in God (Eph. 3:9).
The verse ends up examining the reader rather than the patriarchs.
How do matters stand with us? Of how many of us would God be ashamed, if He were called our God? These are searching questions. God has indeed provided some better thing for us; that is the fruit of His sovereign choice and action. Then comes the question of our responsibility to answer to the grace given. How well Abraham responded in faith to the lesser grace given to him. How poorly do we respond to the greater grace given to us. Let us stir ourselves up, so that in days to come we do not find that God was ashamed of us, though He was not ashamed of Abraham.
- Desire — They wanted a better, heavenly country. God's public call had named only a piece of land.
- Therefore — That desire is why God is not ashamed of them. They let go of present things for coming ones.
- Character — Their lives held many failures. God owned the governing principles of their walk.
- Name — God's title carries His reputation. He is called the God of Abraham, never the God of Lot.
- City — Their desires answered to His own delight, so He prepared a city where all that was of God in their lives will get its glorious answer.
By faith Abraham, [when] tried, offered up Isaac, and he who had received to himself the promises offered up his only begotten [son],
In Genesis 22 God asked Abraham to hand back Isaac — the one son who carried every promise God had made him. Hebrews calls this a test of faith, and the scene tells us much about God, about the son older translations call "only begotten," and about the Father who did not spare His own Son.
Commentators note that God did not test Abraham with something cheap. He reached for the one point where obedience would cost most.
It is worth seeing that God gives us a great honour when He tests our hearts this way. We never read that "the Lord tested Lot." No — Sodom tempted Lot... God knew well that Abraham loved Him far better than Sodom. But He would make it clear that Abraham loved Him better than anyone or anything. So He laid His hand on the nearest and dearest object: "Take your son, your only son Isaac." Yes, Isaac — the child of promise. Isaac, the hope Abraham had waited so long for, the object of a parent's love, and the one in whom all the families of the earth were to be blessed.
The trial was not only emotional. Obeying appeared to destroy the very future God had guaranteed.
This was putting the father of the faithful to the severest test imaginable. He had to give up his only son and heir to the altar, and sacrifice him with his own hand. To all appearances it also put the promises at risk — the promises about his descendants, and through them blessing for all the families of the earth. God's word about Isaac had raised both natural love and religious hope very high and very wide. Now, to human reason, such a command seemed to sweep both away — at a whim, painfully, and for good... Yet he hesitated in unbelief no more at the surrender, painful as its form was to him, than he had at the promise years earlier, unlikely as that had seemed.
Abraham had other children, so the phrase in the verse is not a count of sons.
The passage in Hebrews refers to Abraham. The expression "only-begotten" is not used here to state how many sons he fathered. It does not stress the begetting at all, for he fathered other children. It shows instead that Isaac, as the child of promise, held a UNIQUE place. He ALONE was the one God recognised, and Abraham's faith recognised, as the heir of the promises. Do we not feel, as we read it, the strain on Abraham's affection? This trial of his faith touched the very one, and the only one, on whom all his God-given hopes rested.
The verse calls Abraham the man who had received the promises at the very moment he gives up the heir.
About that remarkable phrase, "he who had received the promises": God asked Abraham to offer up Isaac, the one in whom all the promises rested. Yet faith had given Abraham such inward strength that he laid hold of the One who made those wonderful promises. He had taken those promises as his own. And he held on, even though right then it looked as if they were being taken back on a whim.
Abraham's confidence rested on what God can do on the far side of death.
To man, death is the end of hope. To God it is only the occasion to use the power of resurrection. Abraham trusted without a waver that God would use that power for Isaac... The proof was complete. Faith could go no further. Abraham counted on God to make good in resurrection the seed he had given up to die at God's word — and the promises bound up in that seed. What fresh gain for Abraham! And what gain for all who do God's will, give up what is dearest to nature, and receive everything back better in resurrection!
The scene is a picture of a greater gift, and one difference at the altar decides everything.
God Himself saw in that solemn scene a picture of His own gift of the only-begotten Son of God, whom He did not spare but delivered up for us all. For Him there was no substitute, and there could be none, if our sins were to be judged and borne and blotted out... In His case the death was as real as the resurrection.
- Tested — God laid His hand on the nearest and dearest thing, not on something cheap. He honours us when He tests our hearts this way.
- Unique — "Only begotten" marks Isaac's place, not Abraham's family size. God, and Abraham's faith, knew him alone as heir of the promises.
- Surrendered — Abraham let go of the gift and held on to the Giver, even when the promises seemed to be taken back.
- Raised — Man sees death as the end of hope. Faith counts on resurrection, and receives back what it gave up, better than before.
- Fulfilled — Isaac had a substitute. The Son of God had none, because our sins had to be borne. His death was as real as His resurrection.
as to whom it had been said, In Isaac shall thy seed be called
God had already tied every promise to one child, and verse 18 recalls that word at the very moment God asked Abraham to give the child back. The promise had named Isaac; now the command asked for him — and the writers quoted below follow an older wording of that line, "In Isaac shall your seed be called."
If the promise ran by natural birth, Abraham's other son Ishmael would have a claim on it too.
If the promise must fall to Abraham's descendants simply because they are his descendants, then Ishmael's line must be let in as well. No Jew would allow that, so he must give up his principle. This is a matter of promise. It does not rest on physical descent, but on His own sovereignty: He had limited the call to Isaac. "In Isaac shall your seed be called."
Abraham had other sons, yet Hebrews calls Isaac his only begotten. The word marks a place, not a count.
Isaac is called Abraham's "only" son, and Hebrews puts this as "his only begotten son" (Heb. 11:17). This makes it very clear that Isaac was a type of our Lord, and it also throws light on what the words "Only begotten" mean when they are used of Him. Ishmael did come from Abraham, but he was born in the natural way, so he did not count in God's reckoning; Isaac was altogether unique. So our Lord Jesus Christ was Son of God in a completely unique sense.
Commentators differ on how far to press the comparison. One writer warns that Isaac's case must not water down the term when it describes Christ:
Let us not lessen the force of the word "Only Begotten" by saying that it could just as well be translated "Only", or that it means no more than unique or uniquely precious. It means far more than that. It means that He is the only Son according to His divine nature.
The promise hung on this son, so obeying looked like destroying the promise. One writer traces the reasoning that could have talked Abraham out of it.
There would be a conflict between Abraham's natural feelings and the word of God. There would also be an apparent contradiction between the command and the earlier promise. So nature had room to ask whether his obedience could be right in such a case. Had he heard the command correctly, and understood it? God had promised that his offspring through Isaac would be countless and would hold the leading place on earth. Did that promise not mean that sacrificing Isaac would defeat God's purpose for him and for the world, and would be like throwing away His promise?
Only one thing could hold the promise and the command together, and Abraham had no precedent for it.
In truth there was only one way to bring the promise and the command together, and he took it, wonderful and unheard of as it was. It was the way of resurrection. Abraham counted on it that God was able to raise Isaac from the dead. He had never heard of such a thing before, that anyone should rise from the dead. He may have heard how Enoch was taken away without dying; God could prevent death. But to bring someone through death was unknown, and now it had to happen, because the command could not be taken back.
The letter sets Abraham before readers who faced a change of their own.
Meanwhile faith is tested. Abraham had to sacrifice the very one on whom the promises rested, so that he would hold them from God alone. This example had great power for the Hebrew readers, because they too had to follow Abraham: they had to leave a Jewish Christ in order to receive a risen and heavenly Christ.
The son named in the promise was spared. God's own Son was not.
I need not say much about what is so precious to us: how this is a type of God giving up His only begotten Son. God would not ask Abraham to do what He Himself later had to do. The wood was laid on Isaac, as Jesus carried the cross. Isaac was bound to the altar, as our Lord was nailed to the cross. But when divine Justice lifted up its hand, no voice called out to stop it. The Son was given up to death.
The same writer turns the scene on the reader and asks what is left when God takes what we love most.
There on Mount Moriah, with his only son on the altar, what did Abraham have left? The living God! You may have lost your home, your money, your health, people dear to you, the friendship of those you loved. But tell me, do you have the living God? Then He will make good to you in resurrection everything you have lost for His glory.
- Promise named — God's own choice, not natural descent, tied the blessing to Isaac.
- Promise loved — "only begotten" marks Isaac's unique place. It is not a count of Abraham's sons.
- Promise threatened — the command to sacrifice Isaac seemed to cancel the word that named him.
- Promise held — Abraham held both together in the only way open to him. He counted on a God who raises the dead.
- Promise fulfilled — Isaac was spared, but God's own Son was not. Faith now rests on a risen Christ.
counting that God [was] able to raise [him] even from among [the] dead, whence also he received him in a figure.
Abraham stood with the knife in his hand and his son bound on the altar. This verse tells us what was going on inside him. It was not blind obedience but a calculation — a piece of reasoning about what God is able to do.
The word "considered" points to something Abraham worked out. One writer sets his trust against the way people usually see death:
Nowhere in the Old Testament do we find such complete trust in God. Here the father proved willing to sacrifice his only son — the son who carried all God's promises and all his own hopes. To man, death is the end of hope. To God it is only the occasion to use the power of resurrection. Abraham was sure of that power for Isaac, and he trusted without wavering.
Abraham had evidence for this in his own household. Isaac's own birth came from parents past the age of having children.
Isaac was a child of resurrection even in his natural birth. After this event he became one twice over. Yet the faith was Abraham's own. He reasoned that the God who could bring a living child into the world from parents who were physically dead could and would raise him from the dead.
The difficulty was not only a father's love. God's instruction appeared to cancel God's own word, which had tied every promise to this one boy.
There was not only a conflict between Abraham's natural feelings and the word of God. There was also a seeming contradiction between the command and the earlier promise. So nature had room to ask whether obeying could be right in such a case. Did he hear and understand the command rightly? God had promised that his offspring through Isaac would be a countless multitude and would rule the earth. Did that promise not imply that sacrificing Isaac would defeat God's purpose for him and for the world, and would be like giving up His promise?
Notice the exact wording. Abraham reckoned on what God was able to do. The verse does not say he had a promise that Isaac would rise.
Abraham did not know that God would raise Isaac up. But he knew that God was able to do it. And he surely judged that this was the only way God could fulfil His promise about Isaac.
Many readers of Genesis 22 stop at the ram and the picture of a substitute dying. The closing clause of this verse goes one step further:
Most, we know, are apt to be content with less. They see the love of God set forth in the sacrifice provided; they see the substitution of the ram answering to Him who died for our sins. And there they stop; but the New Testament does not. In Hebrews 11 the apostle Paul clearly gives us another step... That is, Genesis 22 gives us a shadow not only of the death of Christ, but also of His resurrection.
The word "figuratively" keeps the two apart, and one writer draws out why that distinction matters for the promises:
Abraham receives Isaac back from the dead only "in a figure" (Heb. 11:19). Christ was raised in reality, and the promises belong to Him. It is Christ raised from the dead who is the source of blessing to all the families of the earth.
This example spoke to readers who had to let go of something precious themselves.
Meanwhile God tests faith. Abraham had to sacrifice the one on whom God had placed the promises, so that he held them from God alone. This example set before the Hebrews has much power, for they too were to follow Abraham. They were to leave the Jewish Christ and receive a risen and heavenly Christ.
The same writer points out that God did not only take from Abraham. God also gave him something he had not known before:
God tests the heart, so that all confidence in the flesh is destroyed. But He also knows that the heart needs holding up under the trial. So He holds it up by a new revelation, and that revelation lets it triumph. This is what we see in Hebrews 11:19. When God asked Abraham for this sacrifice, Abraham received a revelation about resurrection — something hardly known at that time. This is how God, in His infinite mercy, causes us to gain in Himself what we lose in the flesh.
- Reckoned — Abraham's faith was a calculation, not a feeling. The God who gave him a living son through parents past childbearing could give that son back through death.
- Able — he knew God was able, not that God would. Faith can rest on God's power even without a promise about the outcome.
- Tested — the command seemed to contradict the promise. Abraham trusted God at exactly that point.
- Figure — Abraham received Isaac back only as a picture. God raised Christ in reality, and blessing for all nations flows from Him.
- Gained — God answers what the trial takes with a fresh revelation of Himself. We gain in Him what we lose in the flesh.
By faith Isaac blessed Jacob and Esau concerning things to come.
Hebrews 11 names the people God praises for faith, and from Isaac's long life it picks one scene. Genesis 27 tells that scene as a story of appetite, favouritism and deceit, so how can it count as faith?
Read Genesis 27 on its own and you would hardly call it faith. Hebrews tells us what God saw. The writers quoted here use an older translation, which reads "blessed Jacob and Esau concerning things to come."
Isaac is set before us next as an example of a man who walked in the light of the future. We read that he "blessed Jacob and Esau concerning things to come." Genesis 27 tells the story of how he blessed his sons. As we read that sad chapter, where every member of the family fails, we can find little evidence of any faith. There, Isaac appears to be governed by his appetites and seeking to act according to nature. Here, God, who sees behind all outward failure, lets us know it was by faith Isaac blessed his sons concerning things to come.
Notice the order of the names. Isaac wanted to bless Esau, but the verse names Esau second.
But we rejoice at the turning point of grace in Isaac's soul. He had forgotten the already declared will of Jehovah about Jacob, and he tried to please the son who fed his appetite. God blocked him, and Isaac bowed to it. When God's overruling broke in on him, he did not blame his wife and younger son. He bowed in self-judgment and trembled greatly. In faith he sealed what his lips had said without knowing it, but under God: "he shall be blessed." He felt that, however others were to blame, the error was his own... It was not according to his leanings, but against them: "By faith Isaac blessed" — not Esau and Jacob, but "Jacob and Esau, concerning things about to be."
Isaac knew Jacob's voice. So how did a clumsy trick fool him?
How did Isaac come to be deceived by such a clumsy trick? He knew the voice... No man of the world with common sense would have been fooled like that. How did it happen? He was not in communion with God, and the crudest means can deceive a saint who is out of communion... Then faith awoke, and the scales fell from his eyes. God's will, that the younger should rule over the elder, came back to his memory. Despite his earthly preferences, he said, "he shall be blessed."
Isaac aimed the blessing at one son. It landed on the other.
Is God going to be thwarted? Is He going to be hindered in His purposes? Never! Isaac himself gave the fullest blessing to Jacob, though he thought it was Esau. He did not know what he was doing at the time, yet he spoke with the full sense of authority. That was faith — not in what he intended, for God ruled that. The faith was in giving the blessing, and in realising afterwards that it would stand as the act of God, and that he could not reverse it. It is a striking illustration of the power of divine purpose.
Isaac blessed both brothers, but not with the same thing. Esau's portion was real, and limited.
But God is compassionate as well as holy. He would not go back on His own election. Yet He strengthens Isaac to pronounce a second blessing on Esau. By faith he blessed him also, concerning things to come. A rich and full promise was the portion of the firstborn. But it was a material blessing only.
after-note: heading now fits remaining quote
The younger son came first, and that order had a message for the letter's first readers.
Then Isaac by faith blessed Jacob and Esau, the younger first. This teaches that the blessing, according to the mind of God, does not run in the order of nature. The Hebrews knew that many of their countrymen were resting on being Abraham's children after the flesh. What would that be worth if they refused salvation by Christ? Isaac blessing Jacob had a voice for such people, and for all. "It is those of faith who are the sons of Abraham" (Gal. 3:7).
- Failure first. Genesis 27 shows appetite, favouritism and deceit. Hebrews shows faith in the same scene, because God sees behind all outward failure.
- Faith woke late. Isaac was out of communion with God, so a clumsy trick fooled him. Then faith awoke, and he said of Jacob, "he shall be blessed."
- Purpose won. The blessing reached the son God had chosen, through a father who meant the opposite. God's purpose cannot be blocked.
- Both sons, unequal futures. God strengthened Isaac to bless Esau too, but his portion was material only.
- Faith looked forward. Isaac blessed his sons about things still to come. The blessing did not follow the order of nature, so it is those of faith who are Abraham's sons.
By faith Jacob [when] dying blessed each of the sons of Joseph, and worshipped on the top of his staff.
Jacob's long life was full of scheming, running and loss. Yet the one scene the writer of Hebrews picks out is his deathbed in Egypt. An old man blesses two grandsons and bows over a walking stick. Why does God's record of faith stop here?
The record of Jacob's earlier years is not flattering. One writer traces that history, then shows how it ends:
When he was young, he was a poor sort of saint. He pushed his brother aside, deceived his father, and was driven away from a mother who doted on him. He wandered to Padan-aram, where Laban cheated him — though he cheated too... But the closing scenes of his life were lit up with brightness. God kept him and blessed him despite himself, so that it might clearly be not of the one who wills, nor of the one who runs, but of God who shows mercy.
Three acts fill his final years:
Jacob's best days were when he was old. He blessed the sons of Joseph, blessed his own sons and died a worshipper.
Jacob could no longer make out the two boys in front of him. Yet he crossed his arms on purpose, laying his right hand on the younger boy:
He acts no longer as nature would dictate, but as God would direct. He crosses his hands "intelligently"... Joseph lets his natural thoughts rule him. He does not see the sovereignty of God, who blesses according to His purpose. So he protests when Jacob gives the first place to the younger son. Jacob, however, will not give way... He knows exactly what he is doing. He can say, "I know, my son, I know." ... His spiritual sight was never clearer than at the moment when his natural sight had grown dim with age.
The lesson is not reserved for deathbeds. What Jacob accepted at the end, he had resisted all his life:
This one act of Jacob's life is the only one recorded in Hebrews 11 as an act of faith on Jacob's part... God made His thought known to him at last, and faith triumphed. He said at the end what we all ought to say at the beginning: "Not this man here, though he is the eldest born and the first on the scene. That Man is the man of God's counsel."
Some readers have wondered whose staff this was:
There is not the least ground for making the rod or staff to be Joseph's. It was Jacob's. With his staff he had passed over Jordan once, a poor outcast... Now he is in Egypt, standing before Joseph and his sons, though Joseph ranked next to Pharaoh. Leaning on the staff that had gone with him through all his weary wanderings, the dying pilgrim worships the God whose faithfulness he had proved all the way through. What is more striking than such faith? He blesses the children of his now exalted son, seeing the true worth of Egypt's splendour in the light of the glory of the promised land.
Leaning is the posture of a man with no strength of his own. It is also what makes him able to bless:
Here he appears as a worshipper, and his staff marks him out as a stranger... how different, how changed is the man who leans upon it! It follows the touch on the hollow of his thigh. He has learned the lesson. He leans. The one who can worship and bless others must himself be dependent. And can we ever afford to be anything else?
Readers who turn back to the Genesis account find Jacob bowing at the head of his bed, not his staff. Both records are true, and the difference is easy to explain:
The difference between the Hebrew copies and the sense given by the Greek Old Testament is simply a question of the vowel marks: the same Hebrew letters can be read as a staff or as a bed. There is no reason to doubt the accuracy of the "bed" in the Old Testament, nor of the "staff" in the New Testament. The staff was in his hand while he bowed himself down upon the bed's head.
This verse stands in a set order of three:
The blessing of faith to others (Heb. 11:20), and the worship of faith in the attitude of true dependence (Heb. 11:21) follow, and the hope of faith (Heb. 11:22) closes the series.
- Broken first. The touched thigh came before the leaning staff. God took away Jacob's own strength before He made him a man who could bless others.
- Leaning next. The staff went with him through all his wanderings. He worshipped leaning on it in Egypt — dependence, not rank, is the posture God records.
- Seeing then. His natural eyes failed, yet his spiritual sight grew clearer. He crossed his hands on purpose, and Joseph, still judging by nature, objected.
- Blessing follows. Only a dependent man can hand on blessing, and he hands it on according to God's choice rather than birth order.
- Hope last. Blessing others, then worship in dependence, then hope — that is the order Hebrews 11 follows. Jacob's finest hour came at the very end of a failing life.
By faith Joseph [when] dying called to mind the going forth of the sons of Israel, and gave commandment concerning his bones.
Joseph died at the top of the greatest empire of his day. Yet what Scripture records of his death is an order about his bones — and that is the act it calls faith. Why this, and not Egypt's glory?
Joseph's life was long and eventful, but this verse picks out only his dying words. One writer shows where it sits in the chapter, and who it was written to encourage.
The blessing of faith to others (Heb. 11:20) follows, then the worship of faith in true dependence (Heb. 11:21). The hope of faith (Heb. 11:22) closes the series. The bright outlook of Joseph's dying bones is the one point chosen out of all his eventful history. It was chosen to encourage readers who, two thousand years later, were going through a great struggle of suffering.
Joseph did not ask for a grave in Egypt. He told his sons to embalm him and leave him above ground until Israel left.
He solemnly charged his sons not to bury him with his fathers, as Jacob had asked and received. Instead they were to embalm him. His body was the pledge that they would leave Egypt in God's time for the land of promise. No splendour in Egypt dimmed the light of promise to his faith. The man nearest to the throne of the world is a stranger. He looks for resurrection. He expects God to bring Israel back to the land, as He swore to their fathers.
When Joseph spoke, an exodus looked absurd. Israel was settled and doing well where they were.
When he is dying, all the glory of this world fades from his vision. Instead of looking back to the past glories of Egypt, Joseph is looking on to the coming glories of Israel. At that moment it looked very unlikely that Israel would ever leave Egypt. They had settled down in Goshen and, as we read, "they had possessions there, and grew, and multiplied greatly." Yet faith saw that a hundred and fifty years later God would bring Israel out of Egypt into their own promised land. So faith gave commands with that departure in view.
Two things stood in the way: Joseph's death, and the long delay. Neither counted against the promise.
Joseph believed the promises given to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. He may also have known God's word to Abraham. His offspring would be strangers in a foreign land, afflicted for four hundred years, before God brought them back to the land of Canaan. But whatever the time, his bones were to be buried in Canaan, as indeed happened. Death itself, and the long years in between, were no barrier at all to faith. Faith simply waits on God.
Commentators differ on how long the coffin waited.
The command was not only for Joseph's sake. An unburied coffin in Egypt was a message his descendants could not ignore.
So, in the power of faith's vision of the living God, he gives directions about his bones. They are not to be left in Egypt. What a witness Joseph's coffin must have been to the Israelites through the long centuries! It reminded them always that not even death can stop the living God from doing all He pleases and carrying out His purpose for His people.
Joseph's order was not sentiment about a homeland. He expected to be raised in that land himself.
Joseph had been ruler over Egypt, with all its splendour at his feet. Now he has nothing left but his bones. What does he say? "Take them up into that inheritance which God has provided, where I shall be raised." He looks forward to the time of the inheritance. His faith looks onward and upward — not to his glory in Egypt, but to the future glory when Christ will reign.
Centuries later, on the night Israel left Egypt, no one forgot Joseph's bones.
Moses had enough to occupy his mind on that Passover night, arranging the departure of so large a crowd. What spare time could he have had to care for the bones of Joseph? But Joseph had made the children of Israel swear, in dependence on God. He believed, and therefore he spoke; and putting his trust in God, it was impossible that he could be put to shame.
- Chosen — Out of Joseph's whole eventful life, Scripture picks his dying words as the evidence of his faith. They stand there to steady believers under pressure.
- Free — The man closest to the throne of the world lived there as a stranger. Its splendour never dimmed the promise for him.
- Certain — His own death and centuries of delay were no obstacle, because faith simply waits on God.
- Witness — The unburied coffin stayed among his people for centuries. It reminded them that death cannot stop the living God from carrying out His purpose.
- Answered — On the night Israel left Egypt, in all the rush, Joseph's bones went too. The one who trusts God is never put to shame.
By faith Moses, being born, was hid three months by his parents, because they saw the child beautiful; and they did not fear the injunction of the king.
A king had ordered every Hebrew baby boy killed. Moses was born under that order, and the faith honoured here is not his own but his parents'. Two questions follow: what did they see in the child, and what gave them the courage to defy a king?
The history tells us his mother hid him. Hebrews adds who acted and why:
In Hebrews 11:23 the faith cited is not that of Moses, but of his parents. His mother hid him for three months because she saw he was a fine child. Hebrews shows that his father as well as his mother saw that the child was beautiful. Their eye of faith was fixed on God, so they were not afraid of the king's command. One greater than Pharaoh had their loyalty.
Any mother would fight for her baby. Something more than instinct was at work here:
non-ESV verse quotation; archaic "injunction"; adds depth from source
What did they see that other eyes would have missed?
It means that when he was born there was a look on his face that faith could read. "Beautiful to God" is the word. There was a certain beauty in him that awakened the faith of his parents, Amram and Jochebed, and they obeyed it.
The evidence they acted on would strike most people as thin:
Here is a remarkable simplicity of faith in Moses' parents. It acts on grounds that most people would think far too slight — the beauty of the child. God still answers it, because it was faith in Him. And how fully He answers, for this is Moses the deliverer!
They were the king's subjects, and they broke his law. One writer explains why:
True, they owed loyalty to their earthly king. But they also owed loyalty to the Lord of lords. Trusting in Him, they were lifted above all fear of the king's command, and they hid their child — the child God had given them — for three months. They counted on God, and they were not disappointed, for He never leaves or forsakes those who put their trust in Him. …The rulers of this world are powerless before those who are linked with God by faith.
Faith and fearlessness belong together:
Courage always goes with true faith: "By faith… they were not afraid." Where faith rules, God overrules. Strange turns of providence and strange coincidences mark the path of faith — so much so that everything seems prepared in advance.
Hiding a baby from a state hunting babies solved nothing for long:
The faith of Moses' parents makes them ignore the king's cruel command, and they hide their baby. In answer to their faith, God kept him alive by extraordinary means, when there was no other way to save him. Faith does not reason. It acts from its own point of view, and leaves the result to God.
After three months, the mother put him in a basket at the river's edge:
Hiding the child no doubt put their own lives in danger, but God's honour mattered more to them than the king's command. When the mother later placed the child in the basket at the river's edge, that too was an act of faith, and God used it in a way that was all but miraculous. Did she not really give him up into God's hand, and receive him back again in an unexpected way? So faith never loses by giving anything up into God's hand.
The king's order met Moses at birth, and faith carried him through it:
He enters the world to find that a place on earth is denied him. There was no room for the Lord of glory in the inn, and Egypt's king decrees that Moses, who is a picture of Him, must die the moment he is born! His parents rescued him by faith alone… In later years he must have drawn strength from this godly act of his parents, and owed them much for this first training in the discipline and instruction of the Lord. The start of our course gives colour to the whole of it… Moses' first breath on earth was secured to him only through the faith of his parents.
- Faith saw — the parents acted from faith, not just love. They read God's purpose in the child's beauty and obeyed it.
- Faith stood firm — they owed loyalty to their king, but a higher loyalty lifted them above fear of his decree. One greater than Pharaoh had their allegiance.
- Faith acted — hiding a baby solved nothing for long. Faith does not reason. It acts, and leaves the outcome to God.
- Faith let go — the mother gave him into God's hand at the river and received him back. Nothing given up to God is ever lost.
- Faith reached forward — the child his parents saved became the deliverer, and drew strength all his life from the way they had begun it.
By faith Moses, when he had become great, refused to be called son of Pharaoh's daughter;
Moses had everything Egypt could give a man — education, wealth, a royal name — and faith made him hand it back. Two questions matter here: what "when he was grown up" means, and why refusing a name cost so much.
The phrase marks a settled age, not a passing mood. One writer fixes his age from Stephen's speech in Acts 7:
How old was he when, as the Holy Spirit says here, "he was grown up"? Acts 7 tells us exactly. There the Spirit of God, speaking through Stephen, says, "When he was forty years old, it came into his heart to visit his brothers, the children of Israel" (Acts 7:23). Perhaps you would not call a man of forty young. But he was not old, taking his whole lifespan into account: "Moses was 120 years old when he died. His eye was undimmed, and his vigor unabated" (Deut. 34:7).
This rules out the idea of a rash gesture. He weighed both sides:
Moses was not in the immaturity of his life, for he was forty years old. He took in the whole field. He saw the possibilities of his position in Egypt. He saw the disgrace of his own relatives. Looking calmly at both sides, what does faith do? It refuses all this greatness, its dignity, its expectations.
The world's favour is its own kind of test, and Moses was well fitted for the place he refused:
The parents overcame the fear of the world; their son overcame its favours. This makes the faith of Moses all the more striking, for we may overcome the fear of the world and yet fall under its favour. In Acts 7, Stephen tells us that Moses was "beautiful in God's sight", and that he "was instructed in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and he was mighty in his words and deeds." Here, then, was a man whose appearance was attractive, whose mind was well-stored with all the learning of the leading country of the world in that day, who could apply his wisdom with weighty words, and follow up his words with mighty deeds. Moses, then, was in every way fitted to fill with distinction the highest position in this world. Moreover, this great position was within his grasp, for he was by adoption the son of Pharaoh's daughter, and thus in the direct line to the throne of the Pharaohs.
Note what the verse says he refused: a name. That points to something he did among people who knew him daily:
This victory first shows itself when he tells the courtiers not to treat him as the son of Pharaoh's daughter. This is a very beautiful glimpse of his faith. It shows us much of his inner mind and his daily walk among people. He was not ashamed to own his origin and early history: how his own person was loathed, as it were, on the day he was born, and how his whole fine estate came through the king's daughter adopting an abandoned child. This was indeed beautiful. This was above nature. This was victory over "the pride of life."
There was an obvious argument for staying. Providence had placed him there, and his influence could have served Israel well.
If providence brought him into her house, faith led him out. It was certainly not from any lack of ability to judge the advantage of his position. Suppose the aim had only been to relieve Israel by influence, or even to move them peacefully to Canaan by skilful use of circumstances. No one had a better opportunity, or was better fitted, to bring it about by diplomacy or any other means. But this would have brought praise to Moses, not glory to God, as faith always and rightly seeks. And so Moses turned his back on all natural and worldly advantages, that God might act for His people and against His enemy and theirs.
His refusal was really a choice. He traded each thing he gave up for its opposite:
He gives it all up. "He refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter." He gives up ease, and chooses hardship. He gives up luxury, and chooses degradation. He gives up the very thing the heart would delight in, and chooses the very thing that flesh and nature shrink from.
Christian living is not built on the negative:
Moses was a man of conviction, and his conviction showed itself in this way — he refused! He refused — choosing! The Christian does not live on a negative plane; he lives on a very positive one.
The pull Moses felt has not gone away:
What victory over the world that was! We like those things that put worldly honour on us. Moses would not have it; and I am sure faith is set to the same battlefield and challenged to win the same victory to this day.
- Grown up. Moses was forty. He weighed both sides with a clear head. This was conviction, not youthful impulse.
- Grown great. Educated, capable, adopted, in line for the throne. His parents overcame the world's fear; Moses had to overcome its favour.
- Refused a name. He would not let the court flatter him with a title. He owned his origin instead — victory over the pride of life.
- Refused providence's logic. His position looked God-given and useful. But using it would have crowned Moses, not glorified God.
- Refused so he could choose. Faith says no so it can say yes — and the same battlefield is set before faith still.
choosing rather to suffer affliction along with the people of God than to have [the] temporary pleasure of sin;
Hebrews 11 lists Moses among those who lived by faith. This verse records the choice that shaped his whole life. He turned down Egypt's court and joined a nation of slaves. Which is worth more: hardship with God's people, or pleasure that runs out?
The previous verse tells us what Moses turned down. This one tells us what he took instead.
We also learn what he chooses, and his choosing is as striking as his refusing. In his day there was a large number of people who formed the lowest class in Egypt. They were unwanted foreigners, treated with the utmost harshness as slaves. Their hard bondage made their lives bitter. They laboured at brick-making and worked in the fields under the scorching sun (Exodus 1:13-14). But despite their low position and hard bondage, these slaves were the people of God. Moses chose to throw in his lot with these people. He preferred to suffer affliction with the people of God rather than enjoy the pleasures of sin for a season.
God's providence had surrounded Moses with honours. One question still decided the matter for him: where was God?
The people may be suffering, wretched, and disreputable. They may little understand and poorly repay the love and faith that could give up everything... but it was enough for Moses that the poor captives were God's people... His single eye judged all that Pharaoh's daughter could offer to be the pleasures of sin. He deliberately gave up the glittering honours and worldly influence that God's providence had spread around him... With whom was God identified? With Pharaoh's palace, or with Israel in the iron furnace?
The verse calls Egypt's comforts "pleasures of sin." One writer explains what made them sin.
The moment the truth of God fully awakened his heart, he saw that God completely disowned Egypt and its many attractions. No one knew God in Pharaoh's house. A nation that served other gods afflicted His people. To remain at Pharaoh's court with this conviction in his soul would be to despise the people of the living God. Both his education and his habits fitted Moses well to appreciate the pleasant things of Egypt. God's word promised him only unseen things, so the sacrifice it asked of him looked large.
The verse puts a time limit on the pleasures — "fleeting", or as older translations read, "for a season". Faith sees the same limit on the affliction.
Egypt's greatness may be attractive, its pleasures many, its power unlimited. But the words "For a season" stood over all the greatness of Egypt. So it is with everything this world has to offer. Faith says: those things are temporary. And, thank God, the affliction is temporary too. I will take the affliction. I will identify myself with my people.
Moses lived long enough to test his own choice.
Moses lived a long life — one hundred and twenty years. He turned his back on Egypt and its sinful pleasures at the end of forty years. He had forty years on the far side of the desert. Then a much worse forty years, worried and irritated by people who behaved in a very perverse way... But Moses never regretted turning his back on all the pleasures that could only have lasted another eighty years.
A choice like this takes courage. Faith needs that courage added to it.
Virtue is that energy and courage of soul that knows how to refuse as well as to choose. Moses is the example. He "refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter, choosing rather to be mistreated with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin"... You have the faith that connects you with God, and you believe in what you do not yet see. But now you must add virtue. That is the courage which knows how to say "No" to the thousand things that come up day by day, and how to press on without wavering in the path set before us.
- Refuse. Moses first gave up a name: "son of Pharaoh's daughter." A refusal is only half the story.
- Choose. He threw in his lot with brick-making slaves. They were God's people, and that was enough.
- Company. One question decided it: with whom was God — Pharaoh's palace, or Israel in the furnace?
- Season. "For a season" stands over Egypt's pleasures — and, faith adds, over the affliction too. Both run out.
- No regret. Across a hundred and twenty years, Moses never wished back the pleasures that could only have lasted eighty.
esteeming the reproach of the Christ greater riches than the treasures of Egypt, for he had respect to the recompense.
Moses stood in the richest court on earth and made a choice the world would call madness. Two questions run through this verse. Why is the shame of an enslaved people called the reproach of Christ, long before anyone knew that name? And what did Moses see that made shame look like wealth?
The wording is exact. Moses did not just take insult for Christ's sake. The insult falling on God's suffering people was Christ's own.
And notice what Moses "considered greater wealth than the treasures of Egypt" — it was the "reproach of Christ." It was not merely reproach for Christ. "The reproaches of those who reproach you have fallen on me." The Lord Jesus, in perfect grace, identified Himself with His people. He came down from heaven, leaving His Father's bosom and laying aside all His glory. He took His people's place, confessed their sins, and bore their judgement on the cursed tree.
God Himself gives it that name.
"The reproach of Christ!" Think how the Spirit of God describes it. Here were a people suffering and rejected, and God calls it the reproach of Christ. "In all their affliction He was afflicted," and faith sees in that the affliction of Christ Himself. Later the Lord Jesus said to Saul of Tarsus, "Why are you persecuting Me?" It was the reproach of Christ, not only the reproach of His suffering people.
Moses lived long before anyone knew the name of Christ. So how can the phrase fit him? One answer: reproach has always marked those who believe.
So we find that Moses "considered the reproach of Christ greater wealth than the treasures of Egypt," when as yet Christ had not been named. But though Christ was not yet known or revealed, His reproach was always true of His people. That reproach belongs to faith and to those who confess it. It was seen in full in Christ Himself when He despised the shame. It is their distinguishing badge as they travel the road from earth to heaven.
Others point to what Moses himself was looking for.
The language here, no doubt, takes on a New Testament character; but Moses' faith, in fact, looked forward to Israel's Deliverer, who was to come.
The verb is about value. Moses put both sides on the scales.
Here are the treasures of Egypt: put in that side of the balance everything you can think of in this world's wealth and glory. Here is the reproach of Christ: put in this side all the suffering, the scorn, the self-denial, the poverty, the weakness, the trials that come upon us. As you look at the two, which one, in your judgement, weighs more? If we judge by sight, we would say the treasures of Egypt outweigh all that suffering. But Moses looks ahead to the reward. He thinks of the outcome and says: I will throw in my lot with those who are suffering reproach and affliction, rather than have all this other!
Everything in his circumstances argued the other way.
He gave up on purpose the glittering honours and worldly influence that providence had scattered around him. He considered the reproach of Christ greater wealth than the treasures of Egypt. With whom was God identified? With Pharaoh's palace, or with Israel in the iron furnace? Had he followed providence, he would have used the advantages of his position to help Israel, relieve them, and perhaps in the end deliver them. But faith led him to make himself a stranger to the world and to identify himself with the people of God.
The last clause explains the choice. Seeing the reward corrected his sense of value.
Because he had a view of the divine recompense, he could form a correct estimate of Egypt's treasures. He ranked them far below the reproach of Christ. If Egypt's glory cannot be compared with the reproach of Christ, how will it look next to the glory of Christ? Faith's penetrating sight led to faith's estimation, and this in turn led to faith's choice and faith's refusal.
Yet the reward was not what first moved him.
This principle is universal: in Scripture, reward is never the motive of action. It is always the encouragement of the one who acts from other motives. So, as we well know, it was love, eternal, divine love, and from that obedience to His Father, that led Christ in the path of sorrow. In that path, for the joy set before Him, He endured. Moses visited his brothers because God put it into his heart. He preferred suffering with the people of God over a life of godless ease in a court.
- Reproach named. God calls the shame on His afflicted people Christ's own reproach. He identifies Himself with them — "Why are you persecuting Me?"
- Reproach shared. Moses did not suffer just for Christ. He stepped into a company Christ counts as His, long before anyone knew that name.
- Reproach weighed. "Considered" is a word of weighing. Egypt's treasures sit in one scale, scorn and affliction in the other. Faith says which is heavier.
- Reproach chosen. Providence placed him in Pharaoh's palace. Faith led him out, because God stood with the slaves, not the throne.
- Reproach rewarded. Looking to the reward gave him a right estimate of Egypt. Reward encourages the one already moved by love; it is never the motive.
By faith he left Egypt, not fearing the wrath of the king; for he persevered, as seeing him who is invisible.
Moses had already given up Egypt's luxury and chosen to suffer with God's people. This verse names what carried him out and kept him going: a sight the natural eye cannot give.
Commentators differ. Some say this points to Moses' first flight from Egypt; others say it points to the exodus. The first view rests on the order of events in Hebrews 11:
We believe that Hebrews 11:27 refers to this earlier period, though some treat it as the exodus mentioned in verse 29 of that chapter. The events listed there, up to verse 31, are in the order they happened. Unless verse 27 came before verse 28, this would be the one place where that order breaks.
Others take it as the second departure. They point to how Moses faced Pharaoh each of the two times:
This surely refers to the second time he left Egypt. The first time, we read that Moses fled from Pharaoh (Ex. 2:15). The second time, he stood up to Pharaoh face to face. Under the mighty hand of God he brought the people of Israel out of Egypt in triumph.
Leaving Egypt was more than a change of address. It was a settled break, and a verdict on the place left behind.
Here Moses deliberately leaves Egypt. He will no longer work patiently with it. He gives it up to the judgment of God… In verses 24 to 26 we see decision; in verse 27 we see separation… There is no hint of fear in Moses, and no cringing. For him the presence of God far overshadows the king's power. God is as plain to him as if he could see his invisible Creator standing at his side.
The praise here is striking, because Moses had once been afraid. Scripture does not hide his earlier failure:
At first he trusted his own eyes. He looked this way and that, saw that no one was there, killed the Egyptian and hid him in the sand. Then a cruel and unfair Israelite soon let him know that it was no secret, and Moses was afraid and said the thing must be known (Ex. 2:12-14)… We need to look to the Lord and lean on Him. Moses did so at last, when he left Egypt, not afraid of the king's anger. The great secret is added: he persevered, as seeing the One who cannot be seen. It is something to know that He sees me; but there is far more in my seeing Him.
The verse names endurance, then traces it back to its source. That source is a Person.
And then there was one thing more — he left Egypt. First he gives up its luxury and chooses to suffer with the people of God. Now he turns his back on the whole thing. What gave Moses his power to endure? He saw the invisible God… Our eye of faith sees Christ in heaven, who is invisible to everyone but the man of faith. So the invisible power works in us.
One writer sums up Moses' whole course in four verbs. All four hang on that one sight:
It was the "seeing him who is invisible" which made Moses endure. He had seen the glory of Egypt and tasted its pleasures. But faith's sight took hold of Him who is beyond all sight and sense. So Moses refused, chose, valued and endured!
After his flight came long, quiet years of keeping sheep. That is where the phrase does its work:
The man who once led crowds in the splendour of Egypt now spends his years leading a flock of mindless sheep! Yet "he endured as seeing Him who is invisible." Acts 7 says he acted as "seeing one of them suffer wrong." When wrong exists, it is good that we should see it. But if that is all we see, we easily go wrong ourselves. We go right when faith fixes its eye on God.
Later the same test came to Elijah, and to a man named Obadiah who failed it:
So we may surely say the same of Elijah. He turned his back on the world of his day. He did not fear the king's anger, and, with his vision of the living God, he endured as seeing Him who is invisible. Obadiah lacked all this. He may have feared God in secret, but he feared the king in public. He never broke with the world, and he had no vision of the living God.
- Vision first. Seeing Him who is invisible is what made Moses endure; the sight came before the strength.
- Then separation. Verses 24–26 show decision. Verse 27 shows separation: Moses gives Egypt up to the judgment of God.
- Then fearlessness. The presence of God overshadowed the king's power. Moses stood as if he could see his invisible Creator beside him.
- Then endurance. Refused, chose, valued, endured — four acts held together by one sight, even through long years with a flock of sheep.
- Then the public test. Obadiah feared God in secret but feared the king in public. He never broke with the world, because he had no vision of the living God.
By faith he celebrated the passover and the sprinkling of the blood, that the destroyer of the firstborn might not touch them.
On the night Egypt lost its firstborn, Israel's real danger was not the king. It was the judgment of God on sin. The answer was a lamb's blood on a doorway.
The blood on the door was not only protection. It was also a confession.
Faith recognised God's testimony by trusting the power of the blood sprinkled on the door. So it could let God come in judgment in complete safety. God, seeing the blood, would pass over His believing people. Notice here that, by putting the blood on the door, the people admitted something. They stood under the just judgment of God just as much as the Egyptians did. God had given them what preserved them from it; but it was because they were guilty and deserved it. No one can stand before God.
Israel's sin was as real as Egypt's. So what happened to it that night?
If the world is under judgment because of sin, God must also judge sin in His own people. How can this be done without the judgment falling on their own heads? The passover gives the answer. The blood of sacrifice must shelter the soul. The blood on the doorposts and lintel was the sign that judgment had already fallen. But it fell on an innocent victim, the lamb. Another bore the punishment. What a picture of the great sacrifice of Christ, who has fully borne the judgment of every soul who receives Him as Saviour by faith. Judgment is past, and safety is assured.
The families were inside; the blood was outside. That detail settles where a believer's confidence rests.
It is also important for us to remember that the blood of the lamb was outside for the eye of God. The word was, "When I see the blood, I will pass over you." Once the blood was there, God would not fail to see it. They did not have to see the blood. They knew it was there, and they could rest content with the definite word of God: since it was there, He would pass over them. The blood was for the eye of God: His word was for the ears and hearts of those within.
The verse promises that the Destroyer would not touch them. This is where that safety came from.
The LORD then executed judgment. It was a small-scale pledge of the judgment that will be complete later on. God saw the blood of the lamb, and it held back His hand. The one who destroyed the firstborn did not touch those who had it as a sign on their houses. Faith is not our estimate of the Lamb's blood, but rests on God's perfect estimate. How blessed for every believer!
The verse names two things: the Passover and the sprinkling of blood.
Its lasting value lay not in the ceremony itself, but in the truth it testified to. Its most unique feature, putting the blood on the doorposts, was never repeated. What a witness to the one offering that is effective for ever! It stood in the middle of a system of many and varied sacrifices, until He came whose death vindicated and fulfilled them all.
The verse says "he" kept the Passover, yet a whole nation marked its doors that night.
The verse credits the faith for the whole operation to Moses, but Israel, at the command of Moses, took the blood of the passover lamb and sprinkled it on the side and upper posts of their doors.
Moses could not count on the people to agree to any of it.
But the strength of Moses was not in the people, but in God. He trusted that the LORD, who had given him this charge, would shape their wills into united consent. God did so… Faith alone could discern the outcome of what God instituted on that great night of remembrance… The faith of one man was to set a nation free.
The example is not left in Egypt. Commentators press it as a personal decision.
The Holy Spirit records here that Moses put the blood of atonement, the blood of the slain lamb, between his soul and God. He did it to secure his redemption and to find shelter from the righteous judgment of God. You must imitate Moses if you want salvation. You can have it tonight, if in faith you put between your guilty soul and God the blood of Jesus.
- Guilt — The blood was an admission. Israel deserved the same judgment as Egypt; nobody can stand before God on their own record.
- Substitute — The blood said judgment had already fallen, on an innocent victim instead of the guilty household.
- God's eye — The blood went outside, where the family could not see it. Safety rested on God's estimate of the blood, not on theirs.
- Once — The sprinkling on the doorposts was never repeated — a witness to the one offering that works for ever.
- Yours — Moses put the blood between his soul and God. Commentators urge every reader to do the same by faith in Christ.
By faith they passed through the Red sea as through dry land; of which the Egyptians having made trial were swallowed up.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
By faith the walls of Jericho fell, having been encircled for seven days.
Jericho was a walled city, and Israel besieged it in a way no one had ever heard of: they marched round it for seven days and blew rams' horns. So what brought the walls down, and what were the seven days for?
The walls were a real obstacle, and Israel had no way to bring them down. One writer defines faith and names the power it counts on.
Faith is simple confidence in Another, in the Lord, and at the same time a complete absence of self-confidence, for these two things cannot be separated. The obstacle yields to faith. What does it matter if the walls reach up to heaven? What are they for faith? Faith counts on the power of God, and this, dear friends, is the first great characteristic of faith. The apostle says this is so "that your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God." (1 Cor. 2:5) The fight needs a power that is wholly divine. Only that power can overthrow the obstacle, and faith rests on it alone.
Israel was not passive — it marched and blew trumpets. But those actions were never the cause. They were the shape trust took.
Redemption had been accomplished and deliverance won, yet that did not overcome every difficulty. But the God of deliverance was with them; difficulties disappear before Him. That which is a difficulty to man is none to Him. Faith trusts in Him, and uses means which only serve to express that trust. The walls of Jericho fall down at the sound of trumpets made of rams' horns. This was after Israel had encircled the city for seven days, sounding these trumpets seven times.
So what was the marching itself worth? One writer answers plainly.
Israel used a way of besieging a city that no one had heard of. But it was not simply the walking round the city for seven days that brought down the walls. It was faith that obeyed God's Word.
Six days ended with the walls still standing. The seventh day was different.
On the seventh day Israel showed special zeal and sevenfold energy. … We cannot doubt that this scene looks on to the end, to Israel's future, and the kingdom of our Lord over the world. … Patience marks the way Israel made war — the kind of patience that keeps going until God's time of victory arrives. "Persistency" is a word every Christian needs written on his banner. The soldiers of Christ face a sevenfold — that is, a perfect — trial of faith on the path of obedience. The nearer the day, the more we need to work earnestly for the Lord.
To anyone watching, the marching looked absurd. One writer follows what the people of Jericho would have felt as the days passed.
What could the blowing of rams' horns do towards throwing down the walls of Jericho? What could look more meaningless and ridiculous to human eyes? … On the first day the people of Jericho, apart from one singled out by grace, might have been amazed and trembled at what would follow. By the sixth day they had learned to mock the procession that seemed so foolish to them. The seventh day brought its terrible reality — sudden and irreversible destruction. … This is the obedience of faith, which is foolishness to the world. Faith was patient through the six days and triumphed on the seventh, and God crowns it all by displaying His power as greater than man and independent of him.
Another writer brings the same pattern into the present.
So today God's gospel keeps sounding out to the world with patience, and it is itself a warning of judgment to come. The world digs in against it and hopes it is safe. But God only has to step in, and all their defences crumple: the walls fall down flat, and Israel is victorious.
Hebrews 11 jumps from the Red Sea to Jericho and says nothing about the crossing of the Jordan. One writer explains why:
This letter keeps to the actual walk through the desert, and so to the tabernacle, rather than to the land — except as something still ahead. So we have the Red Sea crossed, not the Jordan. The Jordan would suit the line of truth in the letter to the Ephesians.
- Power. The walls did not weaken; God overthrew them. Faith's first mark is that it counts on divine power, not on the wisdom of men.
- Means. Trumpets and marching had no force in themselves. They only expressed trust. Faith uses such means, but it rests on God alone.
- Obedience. The walking did not bring the walls down. Faith that obeyed God's word did.
- Patience. Six days ended with nothing to see. Faith's patience keeps going until God's time of victory comes. Every Christian needs persistence written on his banner.
- Outcome. What looked ridiculous ended in sudden, irreversible ruin. The gospel sounds the same patient warning today, before the same swift fall.
By faith Rahab the harlot did not perish along with the unbelieving, having received the spies in peace.
Jericho was under sentence, and one woman inside its walls came through the judgment — a prostitute. Hebrews lists her faith with Abraham's and Moses', so what did God see in her that the rest of the city missed?
The chapter has just described walls falling. Now it turns to one household spared inside them.
This was the very time when grace worked in a way no one could miss, in a place no one would have looked for it, if God had not revealed it there… The people of Jericho knew no less than Rahab about what the Lord had done among Israel… Grace worked in this disreputable woman, and made her believe that the Lord had bound Himself in goodness to a people who did not deserve it.
The city was not short of information, and it was not short of alarm either. What separated Rahab was not better news but a different response to the same news.
But fear is not faith. All feared because of Israel; Rahab had faith… All had heard of the Lord's doings on behalf of Israel. All were afraid because of Israel. But all did not know that the Lord had given them the land. Rahab, however, did… That woman lived surrounded by idolatry and all its filthy rites. Yet she had learned, and knew, that Israel's God was the true God, and that He had given them the land. She had no doubt of it. Her language was clear and precise. "I know," she could say.
Hebrews calls the two men spies — enemy agents in a city bracing for war. Older translations say she received them "in peace."
It is interesting, and it teaches us something, that in Hebrews the men are called "spies." To nature, that makes them enemies. Yet knowing this, the Scripture says "she received them in peace." Faith had caused her to change sides before she got assurance… She sincerely bows to the judgment on her own people. That judgment rested just as much on her and her family, and it was too late to make them any better. She begs life from God for herself and for them, otherwise it will be utter destruction.
The men answered her plea with a promise in the same terms.
She had said: "Swear to me… that you will deliver our lives from death." The messengers reply: "Our life for yours." Her faith rested on others to guarantee, by substitution, that death would not reach her. Our faith rests the same way on Christ.
So what does the record credit to her? Not her character.
The one thing recorded to her credit is her faith… Even in the very thing in which she shows her faith she tells a lie. It is as if to set faith apart from any merit at all, and to give us exactly the picture of one who "does not work," but whose only hope is in a God who "justifies the ungodly" (Rom. 4:5).
Verse 30 ends with a city destroyed. Verse 31 ends with a woman saved.
But there is a lovely conclusion to this sevenfold history of faith… So victory did not end only in destruction. In this case it ended in salvation. If there is victory in judging evil, how much more precious the victory in the deliverance of a soul from evil! We are not told how many were with her in the house, but all of them came through safely… It is wonderful that these seven steps in the history of Moses and of Israel end in salvation for people outside Israel!
Her survival was not the end of what faith brought her. She appears later in the ancestry of Israel's Messiah.
God visited her. His mighty grace delivered her, outside and in, and made her part of Israel on earth. By sovereign grace He even placed her in the royal line from which the Messiah had to come.
- Heard. The whole city got the same report about Israel's God; hearing saved nobody. Fear is not faith, and Jericho had plenty of fear.
- Believed. Rahab alone turned the report into "I know." She accepted the coming judgment as just — on her own people and on herself.
- Received. Faith made her change sides before she had any guarantee. She welcomed as friends the very men her city hunted.
- Sheltered. Her safety rested on a promise made to her — "our life for yours" — not on anything she brought. Even her act of faith was mixed with a lie, so she could claim no merit.
- Saved. The seven steps of faith close not in a ruined city but in a rescued household. A former prostitute ends up in the royal line leading to Christ.
And what more do I say? For the time would fail me telling of Gideon, and Barak, and Samson, and Jephthah, and David and Samuel, and of the prophets
Hebrews 11 has moved slowly, name by name, from Abel to Rahab — and then at verse 32 the pace breaks. The writer gathers six names into one breath, adds "the prophets," and admits he has run out of time. Why these six, and why in this order?
One writer traces three stages in the chapter, with this verse opening the last:
Hebrews 11:23–31 gives the sevenfold picture of the "course" of faith. Here the scene changes. We are no longer in the foreign land with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. We are travelling through the wilderness to Canaan, brought out by Moses and brought in by Joshua. Hebrews 11:32 completes the series by giving us the fight of faith in the land of Canaan.
The writer's confession that time would fail him is not weariness but abundance:
So the apostle has traced many an example of genuine faith through a history they knew well. Now he finds his time too short to go into these precious things more fully.
The first four names belong to the days of the Judges, Israel's rulers. Anyone who knows that history notices the order is odd. One writer suggests why:
Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, David and Samuel complete the list of the men of faith mentioned by name. Others have noticed that this list of names does not follow the historical order. In history Barak came before Gideon, and Jephthah before Samson. This may be to stress that in the days of the Judges the faith of Gideon was brighter than the faith of Barak, and that Samson's faith went beyond Jephthah's. David can be grouped with the Judges, since he too was a ruler. Samuel may be placed last to connect him with the prophets who came after the kings.
Another writer walks down that scale, judge by judge:
Gideon was a man whose heart and conscience were truly at work. Barak was so weak in faith that he would not go against the enemy without Deborah, and so he lost the honour God offered him. Yet weak Barak was not as stained as strong Samson. Samson's life was marked by his dealings with the Philistines. Only at the end, blind and broken in spirit, but humbled before God, did he achieve his most wonderful feat — and it cost him his life. Jephthah is lower still on the scale. He stains his victory with a pagan vow.
Barak is the test case. He would not fight without Deborah, and yet God names him:
Barak's faith is like that of many who can follow if someone else leads, though they cannot take first place. It is very gracious of God to name Barak in Hebrews 11:32 as one of the cloud of witnesses who had become victorious by their faith.
What earns a place in this chapter is one thing only:
It was not by their works, or by their lives, but by their faith that they obtained a good report. They were men and women with the same feelings as we have. Their lives were spoiled by many a failure, and at times their actions deserved blame. Still, despite all their failure, faith in God marked them.
These names come from days of collapse. That is why they spoke to the first readers of this letter:
Now we come to the faith that shines among the ashes of a failed testimony. This should have spoken to the Hebrews of that day, as they realised that they were living in the last times. It should certainly speak to us too, who live in days when so much that was bright for God has fallen into ruin and decay. But even if many have fallen by the way; even if the shared testimony has decayed until there is only one here and there, only a little flickering lamp where there should have been light everywhere — faith still shines out in the ruin.
The names are not there for us to admire:
This list of names, the named and the unnamed together, along with the long list of the battles and victories of faith, is not meant to stir up our admiration for the people involved. It is meant to stir up our admiration for the God who sustained them and made them able. Indeed, if we read the history of the first four named, we cannot help being struck by how weak their faith was in many ways. Yet in certain clear cases they did act for God, and faith was plain to see.
- Pause — He stops the list because there is too much to tell, not too little. Verse 32 opens the fight of faith in the land.
- Order — The six names break the historical order. Commentators see a ranking of faith here: Gideon brightest, Jephthah lowest of the four judges.
- Grace — Barak hesitated, Samson was stained, Jephthah spoiled his victory with a pagan vow. Each is named for his faith, not for his record. Faith alone won the good report.
- Ruin — This is faith shining in the ashes of a failed testimony. That is why it speaks to anyone standing almost alone.
- God — The roll call aims our admiration past the men to the God who sustained and enabled them.
who by faith overcame kingdoms, wrought righteousness, obtained promises, stopped lions' mouths,
Hebrews 11 has been naming its witnesses one by one. At verse 32 the writer stops counting names and starts listing what faith did. Verse 33 packs whole lifetimes into four short phrases. What is such a roll call meant to do to the reader?
The names in verse 32 belong to people whose records include real collapse.
This list of names, and of those left unnamed, comes with a long list of the conflicts and conquests of faith. It is not meant to stir our admiration for the people involved, but for the God who sustained and enabled them. Read the history of the first four named, and their faith looks weak in many ways. Yet in certain clear cases they did act for God, and their faith showed. In other cases they broke down, and did not act by faith at all.
Look at the state Gideon was in when God called him.
Nothing could have been more wretched than Gideon's condition here. He was threshing wheat in secret, for fear of the Midianites, to feed his family! Yet here is a man the Spirit of God delights to mention. No man recorded his name, but God counts it worthy of a place in His record. The Spirit of God writes to magnify the grace of God, not to exalt man. He wants us to keep in mind such small details in the story of the soldiers of faith. Then we see what weak and unimportant tools God works with. He has always won His mightiest victories through such people, not through those with resources of their own.
Each phrase points back to a real event.
Gideon and his three hundred men fought the Midianites and Amalekites, who were as many as grasshoppers. In the end Midian went down and never oppressed Israel again. Barak broke the power of Jabin, king of Hazor, and that Canaanite kingdom was heard of no more. Samson began the fight with the Philistines on his own. Samuel, and after him David, carried it on with great success. Jephthah refused to give up any of Israel's land when the king of Ammon demanded it. Then we are reminded of Daniel in the lions' den.
Older translations read "wrought righteousness" where the ESV has "enforced justice." Both middle phrases rest on one thing.
Practical righteousness, in their ways and in ours, is never maintained except by faith. For only God can lead us in a straight and true path. By faith we obtain His promises now, just as they did then.
There is a pattern in when those promises came.
"Obtained promises." Example after example was given in their history of promises obtained from God when everything on man's side was hopeless.
Daniel is the best-known case. What held the lions back?
Here is the whole secret of his protection and deliverance. God produced faith in his soul, and that faith brought God in. God shielded His servant from the hatred of his enemies. He subdued and held back the natural, ravenous instincts of the lions. The apostle has Daniel in mind when he speaks of the prophets: "who through faith… stopped the mouths of lions." This was one of the victories of faith. It was meant to encourage the people of God to trust Him and count on Him at all times.
The list is not just history. Each item has a match in the Christian's life.
"Subduing kingdoms" would have a parallel in the New Testament: we "destroy arguments and every lofty opinion raised against the knowledge of God, and take every thought captive to obey Christ." As to "wrought righteousness," here are "the weapons of righteousness for the right hand and for the left" — righteousness acted on firmly in the face of wrongdoing. "Obtained promises" is a positive result of pleasing God, God revealing Himself in grace to the soul. "Stopped the mouths of lions" is answered in 1 Peter 5:8: "Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour." Sober watchfulness and steadfast faith are the safeguards.
Much of this faith shone when God's people as a whole had failed.
Now we come to the faith that shines among the ashes of a failed testimony. That should have spoken to the Hebrews of that day, who knew they were living in the last times. It should speak to us too, who live in days when so much that was bright for God has decayed. Many have fallen by the way. The testimony as a whole has decayed until there is only one here and there — a little flickering lamp where there should have been a blaze. Yet faith still shines in the ruin, and that ruin is the harvest of what God's people themselves have sown. Faith lays hold on God in it.
- Weakness first. God wins His mightiest victories through people with no resources of their own — a frightened man threshing wheat in hiding.
- Faith next. Faith brings God in. That was the whole secret of Daniel's survival. It is also the only way practical righteousness is kept up.
- God gets the credit. The list is not here to make us admire Gideon, Barak, Samson or Jephthah. They broke down elsewhere. It points us to the God who sustained and enabled them.
- Promises at the end of hope. Again and again they came when everything on man's side was finished.
- Your turn. The kingdoms are now proud thoughts. The lion is now the devil. The answer is still sober watchfulness and steadfast faith, shining brightest in a day of ruin.
quenched [the] power of fire, escaped [the] edge of the sword, became strong out of weakness, became mighty in war, made [the] armies of strangers give way.
Hebrews 11 stops naming names and starts naming deeds: fire that could not burn, weakness turned into power, armies driven off the field. Is this what faith always does, or what faith did in one particular period?
The verse gives no names, but each deed has an owner in Israel's history.
We are reminded of Daniel in the lions' den, and of the faith of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, who were thrown into the burning fiery furnace. Elijah and Elisha escaped the edge of the sword. Jeremiah was an instance of one made strong out of weakness.
The men in Nebuchadnezzar's furnace did not escape the flames — they walked in them. What they found in there was more than survival.
"Quenched the power of fire." There we see the Hebrew young men in the blazing furnace. The idol-worshipping king Nebuchadnezzar had thrown them in. Instead of destruction, they found their bonds loosened. They also found the company of One whom the king himself says is "like the Son of God."
Prophets were hunted and got away. But that escape was not a promise that God shields every believer from violence.
Faith has found, in modern as in ancient times, a refuge from the arm of violence in God. We may expect both treachery and violence in a world where our calling is to be as sheep for slaughter. But He who hid His prophets from the anger of man, when it pleased Him, is the preserver of His people's earthly lives, at His wise discretion.
The phrase does not describe strong men. It describes men who knew they had nothing, and who kept going anyway.
"Made strong out of weakness," like Gideon. He felt himself powerless, and would have excused himself from leading a band of three hundred against a great army. Then, after the great victory over the Midianites, he still kept chasing the fleeing army, so that the victory would be complete. You remember the words: "faint, yet pursuing."
Weakness is not a stage the believer grows out of. It lasts, and the strength that meets it comes from outside.
Weakness is always the saint's condition until by faith he looks to Jesus as his strength. Faith made the fathers brave in their conflicts, when huge armies of foreigners fled before a handful of brave men. They were God's soldiers, and He was their shield. Their valour and their strength were all from Him, who made them worthy of the Name that was their banner.
Verse 34 sits at a hinge. Up to here the chapter praises what faith achieved. After it, the chapter praises what faith endured with no rescue.
After verse 32 the names begin to disappear, and the chapter reverses its earlier order. Examples of the power of faith come first, in verses 33, 34, and the first clause of 35. From there on the chapter celebrates the patience of faith.
The deeds are real, and the chapter honours them. But one writer warns against reading them as the pattern for Christian life now.
It may be useful to note the energy of faith in subduing kingdoms, in being made strong in war, and in putting armies or camps of foreigners to flight. All that fitted the time before the gospel. But it is in no way the model of what the Christian is now called to... In ordinary Christian experience, "made strong out of weakness" applies quite differently from its meaning long ago here. The ground of our difference is plain. Grace is now revealed and reigns as it did not until Christ came, died, rose, and took His seat in heaven.
The fight has moved, but it has not been called off.
We are called to a warfare, but our fight is no longer against flesh and blood. What once won earthly kingdoms must now work in another struggle. It is a struggle against rulers and authorities, against the powers behind the darkness of this world, against spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. By faith the Christian has to press his way into the enjoyment of the things that God in Christ declares to be his.
- Weakness first. Every victory here starts from nothing — Gideon with three hundred, Jeremiah, three men tied up and thrown in a furnace.
- Strength borrowed. The valour was real, but it was not theirs: they were God's soldiers, and He was their shield.
- Rescue on His terms. Deliverance came inside the flames, not around them; and God preserves His people's earthly lives at His own wise discretion.
- Power, then patience. The verse closes the list of what faith achieved. From the next verse on, the list turns to what faith bore with no rescue.
- Applied, not copied. Routing armies is not the Christian's calling now. The same borrowed strength now goes into a fight that is not against flesh and blood.
Women received their dead again by resurrection; and others were tortured, not having accepted deliverance, that they might get a better resurrection;
The same faith leads to two opposite outcomes here: some women get their children back alive, while others suffer torture and refuse release. Why does God record both, and what is the "better life" that made refusing rescue worth it?
The chapter has just listed faith's victories. At this verse the tone changes. One writer puts the two kinds of faith on the same level, and finds an honour in the suffering one.
Faith wins triumphs when it attacks sin and death with active energy. God marks with equal pleasure its gentle, steady endurance of undeserved sorrow and suffering... God has not always hidden His prophets. Sometimes He has honoured them by putting to their lips the cup that Jesus would later taste.
Another writer explains why rescue so often does not come.
Usually, though, God does not step in at once, and suffering follows... They endured. They did not accept the rescue that could have reached them if they had taken back their words or compromised. Faith suffered, but it carried them through.
Two mothers stand behind the first half of the verse. In one of them a writer sees a much older story repeated.
The Shunammite woman repeats, on a smaller scale, the story of Abraham and Sarah. The promised child was given to a woman with no natural hope of one, then taken away in death, and then raised again. We see something similar in the story of Elijah.
Should we expect such raisings today? One writer answers no, and points forward instead.
In these cases, to live was better than to die, because God was dealing with an earthly people. Faith has since learned that to depart and be with Christ is now far better than to stay on earth. So such displays of its power are no longer likely to be seen. Those who mourn will receive their dead back to life when God soon brings with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in Him (1 Thess. 4:14).
The release on offer was real, and so was the price of taking it.
These were not saved out of death. Their faith counted on the better resurrection. Not every martyr was rescued from the death that faced them... But they would not accept release at the price of loyalty to Him. He had called them to that better resurrection, and the eyes of their faith were fixed on it.
Believers long after the Old Testament faced the same terms.
They did not accept release, though it was offered to them if they would renounce Christ. Their faith triumphed in death, and they wait for the full victory in resurrection. "Of whom the world was not worthy" (Heb. 11:38) — that is God's estimate of every such faithful martyr.
Older translations, which these writers use, read "a better resurrection" where the ESV has "rise again to a better life". The word "better" points back to the first half of the verse: those sons came back to a life they would lose again.
A better resurrection means resurrection to life, not a return to this world. The Shunammite's son and the son of the widow of Zarephath only came back to this world.
Read the two halves together, and you see what these sufferers expected for their own bodies.
Compare and contrast the two statements, and it is hard to doubt the meaning. Some received their dead back from the grave, the well-known and much-loved body alive again. Others looked for their own bodies to be raised too, but in a different way and for a different end: never to die again, but to live for ever beyond death. A better resurrection indeed!
The verse names none of these sufferers. But heaven keeps their record.
The others who were tortured refused the release that men offered. They wait for a better resurrection still to come, and they are better known in heaven than on earth.
- Received. Faith once took children back out of death — a real gift, but a temporary one, since those raised would die again.
- Refused. Faith also turned down a genuine offer of release, because the price was loyalty to the One who had called them.
- Better. The better resurrection means life, not a return to this world. These bodies rise never to die again.
- Equal. God takes the same pleasure in quiet endurance as He does in faith's loudest victories.
- Remembered. Their names are missing from the page, but heaven knows them better than earth ever did.
and others underwent trial of mockings and scourgings, yea, and of bonds and imprisonment.
Hebrews 11 has just listed the victories of faith. Then the chapter turns: from verse 35 the same faith wins no rescue, and verse 36 names what "others" got instead — ridicule, the whip, chains, a prison cell.
One writer sets the two halves of the list side by side:
(Verses 33, 34). First, he points to incidents that show the power of faith. It subdues kingdoms and overcomes armies. It is strong in weakness and brave in fight. It triumphs over the power of nature, as represented by the lion, and quenches the violence of the elements such as fire. It even wins victory over death.
(Verses 35, 36). Second, the Apostle sets before us the endurance of faith. Under torture it refused to accept deliverance. In trial it endured mockings and scourgings, bonds and imprisonments.
The verse names mocking before flogging. Samuel Ridout weighs the two:
They had trial of something that may be harder to bear than physical suffering — the scorn of those who do not know our Lord. How keenly sensitive natures feel the slights put upon them! The neglect, the coldness, the sarcastic and condescending smile of pity — these are scourgings that bite deeper than the lash laid across the shoulders. But faith endures, and triumphs over it all.
If mocking is listed alongside flogging, then words are counted as violence — which turns the verse into a warning for anyone tempted to hand out that treatment:
Let us take care that we do not become persecutors. Some think there is no persecution except fire and sword; but there is persecution of the tongue. Reviling is called persecution: "men shall revile you and persecute you"; this is tongue persecution. "His words were softer than oil, yet were they drawn swords" (Ps. 55:21). You may kill a man in his name as well as in his person; a good name is as precious ointment... So the earliest saints endured the persecution of the tongue. They "suffered mocking" (Heb. 11:36).
Every earlier hero in the chapter has a name. From verse 35 the names stop. One writer says where they are kept:
This leads on to the last condition we are to look at — faith in times of persecution... Now names are unrecorded, but the acts of faith were never to be forgotten. So, though we cannot identify all those referred to, we are well assured that their names are remembered in heaven.
Another writer points to where the rest of that history is found:
The Old Testament does not give us the details of such history, at least in many of these cases. Yet no doubt such cases were not few. The records of later church history tell of many godly people who suffered these very things, and tortures even more cruel, for Christ's sake.
The hardest feature of the verse is not the suffering but the silence of heaven while it happens. One writer refuses to soften it:
In every age and in every country it has been so. We find the people of faith the objects of the hatred of man. But God owns this people... Here God gives His history of them. He does not interfere. He leaves them "destitute, afflicted, tormented." He does not meddle with the world, and the world goes on. It will not always be so, but that is the present fact... The world has departed from Him, and He will not own it.
The chapter puts rescue and chains side by side without explaining the difference. One writer traces the same pattern in two men and in two churches:
As we read in Hebrews 11:33-38, some are delivered and escape the edge of the sword; others are tortured, undergo trials, are slaughtered, or wander about. The mystery of God allows John the Baptist to perish in prison while Peter is rescued. The word to Smyrna is: "Be faithful unto death, and I will give you the crown of life." The word to Philadelphia is: "I will keep you from the hour of trial that is coming" (Rev. 2:10; 3:10).
- Same faith. The chapter does not switch topics at verse 35. Power that subdues kingdoms and endurance that absorbs chains are one faith with two faces.
- Scorn first. Mocking heads the list because it can cut deeper than the lash. Neglect, coldness and the pitying smile wound where the whip cannot reach.
- Tongues persecute. Reviling counts as persecution. So the verse warns the mocker as much as it honours the sufferer.
- Names kept. From here the names stop, but the acts are never forgotten. Earth did not record them; heaven does.
- No rescue promised. God does not always step in; one man dies in prison while another walks free. Faith shows itself in endurance, not in escape.
They were stoned, were sawn asunder, were tempted, died by the death of the sword; they went about in sheepskins, in goatskins, destitute, afflicted, evil treated,
The roll of faith in Hebrews 11 ends without names. Three deaths and one long homelessness fill their place. The verse forces a hard question: why did God let faith end this way?
Every earlier hero in the chapter is named. Here the record gives no names. Yet several of these deaths match people we can still identify.
Their names are not given, but God knows them all. He also knows the countless thousands of martyrs constantly added to this list… Some were stoned, as Zechariah (2 Chron. 24), and Jeremiah, according to tradition. Some were sawn in two, as Isaiah was under Manasseh. Some were killed with the sword, as Urijah was (Jer. 26:23), and James the brother of John (Acts 12). They could have worn silks and velvets. They could have lived in the palaces of princes — if they had denied God and believed the world's lie.
Stoning was not street violence. Israel's own law commanded it as a penalty. That is what makes its use against faithful people worse, not better.
The law required stoning for Jews guilty of idolatry, blasphemy, or other open rebellion against the LORD. That is what made the deaths of Naboth and of Zechariah so terrible. The wickedness lay wholly with those in high authority, who twisted the law to hurt saints. We can hardly imagine a worse or bolder wrong. Godly people died the death of the ungodly at the hands of ungodly rulers. It was done by clever lies or in uncontrolled rage.
Older translations add a fourth item here, between the sawing and the sword: "were tempted." The ESV does not carry it. What the temptation was is not spelled out, but the pattern is familiar from later persecutions.
"Were tempted." The kind of temptation is not stated. No doubt it was some offer of escape from suffering, if only they would give up Christ. This was tried again and again with martyrs for the name of Jesus during the pagan persecutions of the early Christians. It was tried too in the equally pagan public burnings in Spain. There, release was offered even after the victim stood in the flames, if only he would deny the truth that had set his soul free. We can well imagine how sharp such temptations were. Loved ones — wives, little children — all begged the father to stay with them, instead of sealing with his blood the faith he had confessed.
The verse turns from those who died to those left alive in animal skins.
Next comes the more drawn-out suffering in life of those who, for one reason or another, were not killed. "They went about in skins of sheep and goats, destitute, afflicted, mistreated." For some this was an even harder test of faith than a sudden death, whether by law or by violence.
There was a reason the world turned on them.
Whether before Christ or after Him, the solid fact remains: God has always had a line of sufferers who believed. It was their faith that made them objects of dislike and persecution. It was not so much that they condemned the world, its pursuits, pleasures, sins, or godlessness. It was the quietest and most telling witness of all — separation from the world to God and His word.
No rescue comes in this verse. Where was God while this happened?
In every age and in every country it has been so. We find the people of faith to be the objects of man's hatred. But God owns this people… Here God gives His own account of them. He does not step in. He leaves them "destitute, afflicted, mistreated." He does not interfere with the world. The world carries on. It will not always be so, but that is the present fact.
Ridout turns the list into a question for the reader.
What an army! No gold braid or uniform on them, no great glory and honour. There you see them in the caves and holes of the earth, dressed in sheepskins and goatskins. Is your place with them? Is that reproach worth more in your eyes than "the treasures of Egypt"? Faith will always link us with that company "of whom the world was not worthy." They are the ones Christ is not ashamed to call brothers.
- Unnamed, not unknown. Their names drop out of the record, but not out of God's memory. He knows every one, and the list is still growing.
- Killed by law. Stoning was Israel's legal penalty for blasphemy. The horror is that rulers used God's own law to kill God's own people.
- Tempted, not just tortured. Deny Christ, and you could live and go home to your children. That offer ran right through the suffering, and it cut deep.
- Living on is harder. Those left wandering in animal skins faced a longer test. For some, that slow suffering was harder than a quick death.
- God waits. He did not step in then, and He does not interfere with the world now. That is the present fact, and it will not always be so.
(of whom the world was not worthy,) wandering in deserts and mountains, and [in] dens and caverns of the earth.
This verse ends a long list of people whose faith cost them everything the world can offer — home, safety, even a name in the records. Then comes one short line of God's own verdict, which raises a question: why did the world treat faith like this?
The wandering here is not travel but expulsion. Nothing the world offered or threatened could move these people:
So they were often outcasts, roaming in deserts and mountains, and in dens and the caves or crevices of the earth. The same scenes repeated in pagan and papal persecutions after this letter was written. That needs no proof here. In the world's eyes they were unyielding and impossible to work with. Nothing won them: not wealth, ease, or honour. Nothing broke them: not slander, hatred, prison, or death. They refuse present glory. They remember who was crucified and by whom; they await His day and see it approaching.
The caves were real places. Palestine had many of them. Some were large enough to hide a man and his followers while their hunter walked in (Morrish Bible Dictionary).
The offence was rarely a loud attack on the world's morals. It was something quieter and harder to answer.
Still, one solid fact remains, before Christ or after: God has always had a line of sufferers who believed. And it was their faith which made them objects of dislike and persecution. It was not so much their attack on the world — on its pursuits, pleasures, wrongs, or godlessness. It was the quietest and most telling of all testimonies: separation from the world to God and His word... "Of whom the world was not worthy," though they were counted unworthy of a place in it, or even of life. But, as has been said, in condemning them it condemned itself; and God forgets neither.
The same pattern returns wherever people confess Christ. The world did not think Christians fit to live. It judged their Lord the same way when it crucified Him. The Holy Spirit answers by putting the true value on them, as He did on these earlier sufferers (A J Pollock).
The world speaks first, and the world speaks by driving people into holes in the ground. God speaks afterwards.
God came out and wrote their epitaph, and it reads: "Of whom the world was not worthy."
The sentence cuts two ways at once, and both edges matter:
One little parenthesis in the long chapter which records their testimony places at once a glorious tribute upon them and a fearful condemnation on those of the other side; it says, "Of whom the world was not worthy."
We cannot match much of what this verse describes to any story in the earlier Scriptures. Commentators differ on who is meant. Some point to believers who suffered after the last Old Testament prophet, in a time when pagan worship was forced on the Jews (F. B. Hole). Others widen the frame further:
The Old Testament does not give us the details of such history, at least in many of these cases. Yet such cases were doubtless not few. And the records of later Church history hold a multitude of godly people who suffered these very things, and tortures even more cruel, for Christ's sake. How full and how precious that word, "of whom the world was not worthy."
The chapter piles these details up on purpose. It speaks to people who were already suffering and tempted to quit.
How the apostle lets it all accumulate before the eyes of those he was addressing! It is as though he were saying: is your affliction worse than that of those who have gone before you? They were heirs of the same precious faith as yourselves... You see what the portion of faith is — nothing here, everything in the living God, everything in the future. You cannot get your portion here; you must wait for it too.
That waiting has a settlement day. They suffered at the world's hands, yet the world was not worthy of them. They were far above it, and this line hints at the reward waiting for them (F. B. Hole).
- Unworthy how — The world judged them unworthy of a home, a place, even of life. God turns the verdict around and calls the world unworthy of them.
- Cause — Their quiet separation to God and His word drew the hatred, not their protests. In condemning them, the world condemned itself.
- Verdict — The world spoke first and buried them in caves; God spoke last and wrote their epitaph.
- Reach — Most of these names are missing from the earlier record. But the pattern repeats in later history wherever the godly suffer for Christ.
- Result — Faith's portion is nothing here and everything in the living God. Those the world drove out turn out to be far above it.
And these all, having obtained witness through faith, did not receive the promise,
Hebrews 11 ends on a pause, not a triumph. Every name in its long list of faith won God's approval, yet not one received what was promised. That raises two questions: what did God say about them, and why did He hold back the fulfilment?
The chapter opens by commending the people of old, and it ends the same way. Older translations word it "obtained a good report." What earned the commendation was not their record.
By faith the people of old received their commendation. It was not their works or their lives that won this good report, but their faith. They were men and women with the same weaknesses as ours. Their lives were spoiled by many a failure, and at times their works deserved blame. Yet, despite all that failure, faith in God marked them. The end of the chapter reminds us again: it was by faith they received this good report.
And the "report" is not reputation among people. It belongs to another record entirely.
Through faith the men of old also received a good report — in God's record of things, of course, not in man's. Scripture shows plainly what made those heroes of old what they were: it was faith. What a perfect contrast between the same men when faith gave them energy and when faith ran low in them!
They were not left without promises. What they never had was possession of the thing promised.
Whatever the different circumstances, enemies, or sufferings of these believers, this is true of them all. God bore witness to them through their faith and gave them promises to sustain them. Still they did not receive the promise fulfilled — the fulfilment they and we all wait for. Meanwhile God had to bring in a new and better thing for us, while Christ, whom men rejected, is at the right hand of God on high.
Even the widest reach of their faith stayed unfulfilled — and the delay was deliberate.
Even though Abraham's faith reached beyond the promise and looked for the city with foundations, which God had prepared for them, they never entered it. It has not come yet. God would not bring them into their promised portion without us. They, like us, had to live by faith in it.
A natural objection follows. How could anyone today be better off than these great names?
How often people object, Do you mean to say that people like you are more blessed than faithful Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob? Is your portion richer than that of Moses or Joshua? Of Samuel or David? Of Isaiah, Jeremiah, or Daniel? Such thoughts overlook the immense change that has come in. The world rejected Christ, the Son of God. He accomplished redemption for those who believe. God has glorified Him at His right hand, and that is the pledge of our own glory. And meanwhile the Holy Spirit has come down to live in us.
Commentators differ over the "better thing." Is it only blessing we have now, or a difference in future glory too? One writer leaves the question open. He says only that something better is stated of the later believers, "whether that better thing be present or future" (William Kelly). Others describe it in present terms: what is open to faith now was shut to them.
The heavens are open now to faith as they were not to them. Christ has passed into the heavens and has become the present object of faith. He took His place there on the ground of accomplished redemption. So God has made heavenly things known as the present portion of Christians. Our citizenship is there. God has come out of the thick darkness of Mount Sinai and has fully revealed Himself in the Son. By the perfect work of the Son of God we have free access to Him in the sanctuary of His presence.
The delay runs in both directions. Neither group finishes first.
But we shall all enter the full enjoyment of our own portions together. They will not "be made perfect" without us, and we may add, nor we without them. We shall all reach final perfection together, on the day of resurrection and glory, when the Lord Jesus comes again.
So they are still waiting: "Instead of being perfected in resurrection glory when the Lord came and accomplished redemption, they had to wait for us who are called to share in the heavenly calling" (William Kelly).
- Faith, not record. God's approval rested on faith alone. Their lives held real failures, but those failures never cancelled the witness He gave.
- God's ledger. The good report stands in God's record of things, not in man's.
- Promises, not the promise. They held enough to sustain them and died without possession; even the city they looked for has not come yet.
- A better thing meanwhile. The world rejected Christ, and God has glorified Him in heaven. That opens to us what was shut to them: heaven as a present portion, and free access to God.
- Perfected together. No one is finished ahead of anyone else. They wait for us, we wait with them, and resurrection at the Lord's coming completes both at once.
God having foreseen some better thing for us, that they should not be made perfect without us.
Hebrews 11 closes by putting two groups side by side: the faithful men and women who died still waiting, and "us" who live after Christ has come. The last verse says why they waited, why they are still waiting, and how God has tied their future to ours.
God commended everyone named in this chapter. Yet not one of them received what He had promised.
They had not received — that is, they never actually held — what God had promised them. Their faith may have gone beyond the promise and looked for the city with foundations that God had prepared for them. Even so, they never entered it. It has not come yet. God would not bring them into their promised portion without us. They, like us, had to live by the faith of it.
The delay has a cause. God had something else to bring in first, and it turned on how the world treated Christ.
In the meantime God had to bring in a new and better thing for us, while Christ, who was rejected, is at the right hand of God on high. So although Christ's first coming laid the ground for every blessing, the fulfilment of it all waits for His coming again. Only when God's provision for us is complete will they be made perfect — not before.
The verse does not spell out what the better thing is. Commentators point to where Christ now is, and to what that opens for us.
But heaven is open to faith now in a way it was not open to them. Christ has gone into heaven and taken His place there, on the ground of a redemption already accomplished, and He is now the object of faith. So God shows heavenly things to be the present portion of Christians. Our citizenship is there... All this wonderful privilege belongs to the calling of the Christian — that is, to those called during this time when the earth rejects Christ. It did not belong to believers before He came and died and rose again.
The word itself runs right through the letter.
In Christianity the "better thing" has come to light. In fact the word "better" marks out this letter, because, as we have seen, its great point is to show that real Christianity rises completely above Judaism. We have already met a BETTER Apostle, Priest, hope, covenant, promises, sacrifice, substance, country and resurrection.
Set beside the giants of this chapter, the claim sounds impossible. People have long objected to it.
Where God has never taught people to understand these new blessings, how often you hear objectors ask: do you mean to say that people like you are more blessed than faithful Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob? Is your portion richer than that of Moses or Joshua? ... Such thoughts completely overlook the immense change brought in by the world's rejection of Christ the Son of God; by the redemption He accomplished for those who believe; by His glorification at God's right hand as the pledge of ours; by the Holy Spirit sent down in the meantime to live in us as anointing, seal, and down payment.
"Perfect" here is not something anyone has reached yet.
There is no perfection, in the full sense, short of resurrection and bearing the image of Christ in glory. For this we wait... For if at His shout the dead in Christ (all who are Christ's) rise first, in bodies of glory, then we who are alive and remain will be changed in a moment. We will be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air. And so we shall be made perfect together.
The verse traces this better portion back to God's foresight, not to anything in us.
God saw further ahead, and He included the believers of today in His purposes of grace... This is pure, unspoiled grace, and it should bow our hearts in adoring thanksgiving. Why should we receive it, and not they, who suffered so much for their faith? At the very least, all of this humbles our hearts in thankfulness to the all-wise and gracious God of glory.
- Waiting. Everyone in the chapter died with God's approval, but no one died holding the promise.
- Reason. The world rejected Christ, so God brought in something new for us. The fulfilment of it all now waits for His return.
- Better. The better thing is an open heaven, Christ on high as the present object of faith, and our citizenship there.
- Together. No one reaches perfection alone. It means resurrection and glory, and they and we arrive at the same moment.
- Response. We earned none of this richer portion, and it came to us and not to people who suffered far more. That should humble us.