This is the history of Noah. Noah was a just man, perfect amongst his generations Noah walked with God.
Genesis 6:9 introduces one man whose life stood in total contrast to the world around him. It answers the question every reader of the flood story asks: why was Noah spared?
Some writers below quote an older translation: Noah "found grace" and was "a just man, perfect in his generations." The ESV says he "found favor" and was "a righteous man, blameless in his generation."
One writer reads the verse's opening line as the reason Noah's household escaped the flood:
Then in Genesis 6:9 we read, "These are the generations of Noah." This gives the fitting ground for his escape from the flood, along with his three sons and their wives.
Verse 8 says Noah found favour in God's eyes. Only after that does Scripture describe his character. One writer shows why that order matters, and what "perfect" does not mean:
It is written: "Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord." This comes before the statement, "Noah walked with God" (Genesis 6:8-9). This is always God's order. No man can walk with God until he has tasted the grace of God. "Noah was a just man, and perfect in his generations." "Perfect" does not mean "sinless." His sad failure after he came out of the ark is proof enough (Genesis 9:21). But, as the margin suggests, Noah was an upright man who sought to walk before God in integrity.
Calling Noah righteous is not the same as saying he was justified before God. One writer separates the root from the fruit:
Further, it is not correct to say that he was a just man, that is, justified before God. … The grace that justified him worked in him and through him practical righteousness before man. … The one (in Romans 4) is justification before God, the root of all. The other is the resulting fruit "shown" before man. Each is indispensable in its place; both are united in their season in every true believer. Practical righteousness is the effect, in no way the cause, of justification by faith. … We also know from Hebrews 11:7 that faith was the starting principle, through grace, of the conduct that marked him out in that day. By that faith he also condemned the world, as heir of the righteousness that is according to faith.
Scripture uses the same words of one man before Noah:
It is recorded in Genesis 5:22, "Enoch walked with God." … These two devout men lived in evil days, but they walked in separation from the evil, and in communion with God.
That walk also produced a public witness. Set beside Lot, the contrast is sharp:
Noah is an example of the separate saint bearing testimony to the world… Peter tells us that he bore witness for God as a "preacher of righteousness". Lot is a picture of a large class of believers. They have no faith for the separate path, so they settle down in the world. They are saved in the end, but they are no testimony to God while they pass through it. Peter does tell us that Lot was a "righteous man". Yet, by living among the wicked, he tormented his righteous soul day after day. He knew nothing of a walk in peace and nearness to God.
Scripture describes only one man this way. That carries a lesson for anyone who finds no company in following God:
Noah was righteous in his human relationships and blameless in his personal character, because "he walked with God." The earth's population had grown so large. It is deeply sad that only one man walked with God. In this he is a picture of the Lord Jesus. Yet he does show that a believer can walk in true, godly separation from an evil world, even with no one else to share that path. … In any case, a lonely path with God is far better than having many friends without God's presence.
What followed tested this description, and God then repeated it:
That is how Scripture describes this man when he first appears in the record, at the ripe age of five hundred years. He then made the ark as God directed. God said to him, "I have seen that you are righteous before Me in this generation" (Genesis 7:1). He proved that he was righteous. He illustrated the obedience of faith.
- Grace first. Noah found favour before Scripture ever calls him righteous. No one walks with God until he has first tasted God's grace.
- Then character. "Blameless" means integrity, not sinlessness; his later failure proves it. His righteousness was the fruit of grace, never its cause.
- Then the walk. Walking with God meant communion with Him and separation from the evil of his day. Scripture says the same of Enoch.
- Then testimony. That separate walk made him a preacher of righteousness. Lot was righteous too, but he settled in the world and bore no witness there.
- Then proof. A lonely path with God is better than crowded company without Him. God Himself confirmed the verdict: "I have seen that you are righteous before Me in this generation."
And Noah begot three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
Genesis 6 tells of corruption, violence and coming judgment. In the middle of it stands one man and a short family list — three names that carry the whole future of the human race, set down in an order that is not the order of their birth.
Other passages let us work out the actual order of their births, and it does not match the list here. One writer sets the lists side by side:
In Genesis 6:10 we find the names of Noah's sons: Shem, Ham and Japheth. Turn to Genesis 10:1 and 1 Chronicles 1:4, and each chapter gives the same names in the same order. Yet in the light of Genesis 9:24 and 10:21 we gather that the actual order of their birth was Japheth, Shem and Ham. But Shem was the one specially chosen in the sovereignty of God, so his name comes first.
Commentators differ on one detail: whether "younger son" in Genesis 9:24 means Ham himself or his son Canaan.
This swap is not a one-off:
A different order than the natural one is before us. The reason: the natural order — that is, birth order — constantly gives way when it crosses the order of grace and God's purpose of blessing.
Everyone alive today traces back to these three men and their wives:
A fresh start for the race began after the flood that judged a guilty world. God preserved Noah and his three sons from destruction. From them began conditions that continue today, and that will continue for their descendants until the Son of Man comes with the clouds of heaven... So the history of man is comparatively recent, and so is his threefold separation into lands and languages, families and nations. This time the race does not begin with a single line. We have three heads with their wives — three great families to renew the history of man on earth.
God names the three sons here, before the ark is even built. They will enter it as part of a household. On what ground?
The Lord commands Noah to enter the ark with his house on this ground: "For I have seen that you are righteous before me in this generation." Someone may object that all the members of the household were probably righteous before God too. But the later history of one of them — Ham — forbids that thought. So nothing can weaken the force of the statement: God delivered the family of Noah from the judgment of the flood because of the faith of its head.
One quiet detail in the family list is easy to walk past:
The three sons of Noah, all married men, did not carry one infant into the ark. Eight adult persons passed through the flood. What a touch this is, showing God's thoughtful arranging, His planning tenderness! And it comes in such an unexpected place that it may well comfort many who are going through hard circumstances.
The three lines do not develop alike:
The fountain heads were three, first named in this order: Shem, Ham and Japheth. The first was the family in which God would establish His covenant on earth, and with which He would be in relationship. Then came the one who stood in hostility to God's family. Last came the Gentile Japheth, though he was the eldest and proudest.
After the flood the same three names appear again, with one phrase added — and that phrase casts a long shadow:
Scripture again draws attention to the three heads of Noah's race, "Shem, and Ham, and Japheth," in the same order as before (Genesis 5:32, 6:10, 7:13). Now there is an ominous addition: "and Ham is the father of Canaan." The sad incident that follows explains this at once, and the solemn prophecy that closes the chapter explains it still more. That prophecy echoes through the whole Old Testament, and it will only be brought to completion in that kingdom which awaits the Anointed of Jehovah.
- Named — In a chapter about total corruption, God records three ordinary names. He is already preparing the line through which the world will continue.
- Chosen — Shem stands first, though he was not the firstborn. Birth order gives way to God's purpose of blessing.
- Carried — The sons entered the ark on their father's faith, not their own. Ham's later behaviour proves it.
- Multiplied — From these three men and their wives the whole human family began again, in all its languages and nations.
- Divided — Later the same three names reappear, now with "Ham is the father of Canaan" attached. Coming through judgment is not the same as walking with God.
And the earth was corrupt before God, and the earth was full of violence.
Just before the flood, God looked at the world and summed it up in two words: corrupt and violent. Two questions follow — why these two evils, and why is the earth itself charged, not only the people in it?
One writer reads the verse as Scripture's own account of how sin works.
There are two forms in which sin, or the activity of man's will, shows itself — violence and corruption. This showed itself at the time of the flood. The earth was corrupt in God's sight, and the earth was filled with violence. Satan is a liar and murderer. In man, corrupt desires are even a more abundant source of evil.
These two evils are not new, and they do not point the same way.
Corruption and self-will have been at work from earliest ages, and in fact were the two great evils let loose among the race in the period before the flood is Godward; violence manward.
Order matters here. Scripture names corruption first, and one writer explains why people get the ranking of these two evils backwards.
Then comes man's most serious evil — his corruption before God. That corruption led to an earth filled with violence (v. 11). Violence is against other people, and people call that the worst thing. But their corruption is against God, and they think little of it. If there were no corruption, there would be no violence. … God tells Noah that the end of all flesh was near, because the earth was filled with violence. Violence was the glaring proof of man's corruption (v. 13).
Why did violence fill the earth with no check on it? One writer looks at the age itself, and at the risk run by anyone who spoke against it.
Genesis 6 tells us that the earth was corrupt in God's sight. It also tells us that "the earth was filled with violence." God had set up no government, and men gave free rein to their lawless desires. They took revenge on one another without restraint. Imagine a man among them condemning their terrible ungodliness and warning that the Lord was coming to judge them. Would they hear him without their anger rising to murderous heights?
One writer traces this ruin back to its start, and takes the word "earth" at face value.
Ever since sin entered the world through the fall of man, its degrading defilements have been spreading. … Notice: corruption had affected the earth itself, for man had also corrupted God's way. Material as well as moral corruption was present.
This is God's own verdict, not a human survey. One writer asks what that scene was to God Himself.
… For the divine nature, what mattered was the horror of an earth corrupt and full of violence. It stands in contrast with Noah — a righteous man, blameless among his generations, walking with God when all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth.
Jesus said His return would come in days like Noah's. One writer uses that to test the hope of a world getting steadily better.
Remember the words of the Lord Jesus Christ: "Just as it was in the days of Noah, so will it be in the days of the Son of Man." Some would have us believe that this earth will be covered from pole to pole with a fair mantle of righteousness. They say this will happen before the Son of Man appears in the clouds of heaven. How was it in the days of Noah? Scripture replies, "the earth was filled with violence." "ALL flesh had corrupted their way on the earth." … "Righteousness" and "violence" are not very like each other.
The same two evils become questions for our own life.
These are the two great classes of sins that God had before Him when He said He would destroy the world by a flood. The world has not changed. If we are wronged or slandered, if we have personal grievances against others, what do we show? Is it a peaceful or a violent spirit? On the other hand, there is a moral corruption surrounding us, like the air we breathe.
- Root — corruption comes first: it is against God, and people think lightly of it.
- Fruit — violence is the visible proof of it; remove the corruption and the violence would not exist.
- Reach — corruption is toward God, violence toward people. The ruin reached the earth itself, material as well as moral.
- Restraint — God had set up no government yet. Lawless desire ran unchecked, and the man who warned them stood in danger.
- Repeat — the days of Noah are the pattern for the days of the Son of Man. The same two evils test our own spirit and desires.
And God looked upon the earth, and behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted its way on the earth.
God looks at the world before the flood, and His verdict is one word: ruined. Three questions follow — what "corrupt" means, whose way all flesh had corrupted, and what God does when the ruin covers everyone.
Genesis opened with God looking at His own work and calling it very good. One writer sets that scene beside this one and asks who has been at work since.
In Genesis 1 God was alone, producing the fruit of His own handiwork, in wisdom, goodness, and skill, and then all was good and desirable... But now it is not God's hand presenting a perfect work to God's thoughts and affections. It is man, the rebel workman, spreading out a wide scene of corruption and violence, for the grief and regret of the mind of God. That is where the secret of the change lies. Man has been at work. Man has been shaping and furnishing the scene, and not the living, blessed God.
The older wording says all flesh had corrupted "his way" — that is, God's way. The damage was not only in behaviour but in the earth itself.
Note this: corruption had affected the earth itself, for man had also corrupted God's way. The corruption was material as well as moral... Ever since sin came in, corruption has thrived and grown. Sadly, its willing victims rush to spread its terrible influence, driven by the sinful desires of body and mind. They are themselves "slaves of corruption," as the Scripture says (2 Peter 2:19).
The word behind "corrupt" explains why the ruin spread through everything.
We have to admit, sadly, how corrupt this world is. It touches every area, so everything is falling apart — for the word "corrupt" carries the thought of "decay and pining away."
The verse before this one pairs corruption with violence. One writer explains which of the two is worse, and how people rank them the other way round.
The passage then points to the most serious evil of man — his corruption before God — which led to an earth filled with violence (v. 11). Violence is of course against others, and people consider this the worst thing. But their corruption is against God, and they think little of it. If there were no corruption there would be no violence... God tells Noah that the end of all flesh was near, because the earth was filled with violence. Violence was the clear proof of man's corruption (v. 13).
The word "all" rules out any idea that judgment fell on the worst of society while better people survived on their own merits.
There must be the entire destruction of that which had corrupted God's way on the earth. "The mighty men, and men of renown," must all be swept away, without distinction. "All flesh" must be set aside, as completely unfit for God. God said, "I have determined to make an end of all flesh." It was not the end of some flesh only. No, all of it was corrupt in the sight of the LORD — all beyond recovery.
The verdict falls on nature, not just on conduct. So effort and polish change nothing.
There is nothing good at all in our sinful nature... But can diligent prayer and watchfulness improve it? No, never: it is completely incurable... True, in some we find nature polished, cultivated, and refined; in others, rough, rude and rugged. But it is the same sinful nature in both. We may not be able to bend a bar of iron, yet it can be hammered out until it is quite flexible. But it is the same iron still. Its appearance has changed, but its nature is the same.
The same passage that announces the end also gives the order to build. Commentators read the ark as a picture of Christ, and the flood as the end of the old order.
Here, then, was a picture of the end of the old creation. All was to pass under the waters of judgement. What then? "Make yourself an ark of gopher wood." Here we have a picture of the new thing. That ark, floating quietly over the dark depth of waters, was a picture of Christ, and of the believer in Him... It all hinges upon this one question. "Am I in or out of Christ?"
One writer also holds this scene up against what people expect the world to look like before Christ returns.
How was it in the days of Noah? Did righteousness cover the earth, as the waters cover the sea?... Scripture replies, "the earth was filled with violence." "All flesh had corrupted their way on the earth." "The earth was corrupt in God's sight." Well then, "so will it be in the days of the Son of Man."
- Corrupt — the word carries decay and wasting away. The ruin was moral and material, and man had corrupted God's way, not just his own.
- Cause — corruption toward God came first. The violence that shocks people was only its proof.
- Scope — "all flesh," not some. God swept away the famous and the brutal alike.
- Incurable — polish changes how the iron looks, never what it is. God does not improve that nature; He judges it.
- Ark — God announces the end, then names one shelter, a picture of Christ. The only question left is whether you are in Him or outside.
And God said to Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me, for the earth is full of violence through them; and behold, I will destroy them with the earth.
God speaks the sentence on a whole world to one man, and He gives His reason: the earth was full of violence. What does "all flesh" cover, why does God name violence, and why does the same speech that announces destruction also lead to an ark?
The verse names violence as the reason for the sentence. One writer looks under that violence, and separates what people notice from what God notices.
The most serious evil of man is his corruption before God, and it led to an earth filled with violence. Violence is of course against others, and people consider this the worst thing. But their corruption is against God, and they think little of it. If there were no corruption there would be no violence. But at this time "all flesh" had corrupted itself. God tells Noah that the end of all flesh was near because violence filled the earth. Violence was the glaring proof of man's corruption. God would destroy the people along with the earth.
Older translations read, "The end of all flesh is come before me," and the writers below quote that wording. The sentence covers everyone, not just the worst offenders. God keeps nothing back as still usable, and in the same breath He names His remedy.
The mighty men and the men of renown must all be swept away, without distinction. "All flesh" must be set aside as completely unfit for God. "The end of all flesh is come before me." This was not the end of some flesh only. No, all of it was corrupt in the sight of Jehovah — all of it beyond recovery. God had tried it and found it wanting. Then the Lord announces His remedy to Noah: "Make yourself an ark of gopher wood."
The word "end" marks a closed case, not just a coming disaster. One writer pictures the difference between a man awaiting trial and a man already condemned.
The end of man's time of testing has come before God. It is too late for man to ask for a new trial. He is guilty and under condemnation. It is too late for that poor young man, condemned to death, to talk of being tried again. He must be pardoned or executed. Such is man's condition. The prisoner may dream he is free, and hope to commit no more crimes — but he wakes for execution.
Before the flood arrives, God speaks. He tells Noah what He had already settled in His own heart, and the way He tells him matters as much as the news.
He dealt with him as a man deals with his friend, and as God deals with a chosen sinner. "The end of all flesh is come before Me," says the Lord to Noah, telling him what had been passing in His own heart. Later, on the day of the waters, He showed the same gracious friendship. When the ark was about to float on the scene of judgment, "the Lord shut him in." He did it with His own hand.
The flood does more than end the old world. The same waters lift the ark, and one writer sees the death of Christ in that.
The flood of waters that came, covering everything, so that the end of all flesh came, is a picture of the death of Christ. In His death God passed judgment on all flesh and carried it out. The waves and billows rolled over His innocent head. He passed through death and judgment for us and has made Himself our perfect ark, our hiding place. In Him we are lifted above the waters of judgment.
One writer takes this sentence beyond the flood. God does not improve the flesh, and only two places remain where He ends it.
There can be no purifying of the flesh. God has only one way to deal with it. As He said in Genesis 6, "The end of all flesh is come before me." He deals with it either at the Cross, where faith submits to the sentence, for God, "by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, ... condemned sin in the flesh" — or else in the lake of fire.
- Cause — Corruption toward God came first. The violence that filled the earth was its visible proof.
- Verdict — God ends all flesh, not just its worst examples. It was tried, found wanting, and beyond recovery.
- Closed case — Man's testing is over, not just going badly. Two options remain: pardon or execution.
- Friendship — God told Noah what had been passing in His own heart, and later shut him in with His own hand.
- Shelter — The waters that ended the old world carried the ark. Christ passed through that judgment and is Himself the hiding place. So the flesh meets its end at the Cross or in the lake of fire.
Make thyself an ark of gopher wood [with] cells shalt thou make the ark; and pitch it inside and outside with pitch.
God tells Noah how to survive the judgment He has just announced. The answer is a wooden ark with rooms inside, sealed with pitch — and that word for pitch is the word used elsewhere for atonement.
The judgment and the way out came from the same mouth. Noah's part was to believe both.
The Lord, in this way, provided Noah with an answer to His own righteous and purposed judgment that was coming on the world before the Flood. "Make yourself an ark of gopher wood," said God to him. Noah did so, believing the word both of judgment and of deliverance, and he was safe.
God spelled out the design, down to the rooms and the single door.
Yet the grace of God would provide a refuge for those who realized their need of His grace. God instructed Noah to make a large ark of gopher wood. It was six times as long as it was wide, with three decks and rooms built in, not only for people but for animals too, and covered with pitch inside and out (v. 14). One door is mentioned, which may seem inadequate for so large a ship, but it pictures the truth that Christ alone is the door of salvation for mankind.
No one can say for sure which tree gopher wood came from. But its name stands close to the name of the pitch.
The ark is built of gopher wood. We do not know this "gopher," but the name is very close to the "copher" or "pitch" named afterward... Because of this, the gopher has long been thought to be the cypress, which could well have supplied the "pitch" for the ark's seams. The picture would then fit even better. There is no doubt that the gopher, like the acacia wood of the tabernacle ark, refers to Christ, and "copher" is the word used elsewhere for "atonement." It was not enough that the tree be cut down to provide a refuge from the waters of judgment. The seams also had to be sealed with the pitch the tree supplied. And so death by itself, even Christ's death, would not have been enough to make safe the soul that fled to Him for refuge.
The pitch did more than keep the water out.
Now there was one very interesting feature in that ark. It was covered "inside and out with pitch." That was not only to make it watertight. It would do that, of course. But it was also to teach us a great truth, even if Noah did not understand. The word "pitch" in our translation is the same word translated "atonement" seventy times in the Old Testament. Only in this one place is it translated "pitch." It means a covering — a covering God ordained and provided for the man who had found grace in His eyes. Wherever Noah looked inside the ark, he saw this covering. Wherever God looked outside the ark, He saw the covering. Atonement within, atonement without.
Everyone in that generation ended up covered by something. What differed was the covering itself.
The waters of judgment fell upon the ark, but because it was covered, not one drop touched those inside... It is significant that the waters of judgment also covered the unbelievers, but there was no atonement in that covering.
God ordered the ark sealed. He also took charge of its one door.
Remember, the Lord's own hand shut Noah and his family in the ark (Gen. 7:16), which was made judgment-proof outside and inside (Gen. 6:14). God Himself secured the door. None could enter, and none could get out. "The Lord shut him in." God took charge of the door — safety — while Noah looked out of the window above — communion.
God gave this instruction to one man for one flood. What it pictures is already finished.
As a sinner there is nothing before you but judgment... But you may find a place of safety. You say, Where is it? You do not have to prepare an ark, because God has prepared one. Christ is the place of safety now. He bore all the judgment and the wrath, rose from the dead, and is now at God's right hand.
- Word — God announced the judgment and the remedy in one breath; Noah believed both and was safe.
- Wood — the tree had to be cut down to make the refuge, a picture of Christ; but timber alone would not hold back the waters.
- Pitch — the sealing word is the word for "atonement" seventy times elsewhere. Death alone was not enough. Atonement was needed.
- Within and without — Noah saw the covering inside, and God saw it outside. The same flood that covered the unbelievers left no drop on those in the ark.
- Door — one entrance, shut by God's own hand. It pictures the one place of safety already prepared, so no one today has an ark to build.
And thus shalt thou make it let the length of the ark be three hundred cubits, the breadth of it fifty cubits, and the height of it thirty cubits.
Here God gives Noah the exact size of the ark, a huge ship to build on dry land long before the flood came. Two questions follow: was it a real vessel of real size, and why did God draw up the plan Himself?
God gave the plan; Noah supplied the labour and the faith.
So Noah started his great work of preparing an ark to save his household. God was the Architect, so he had no need to worry about its design. His only concern must have been to carry out properly what God had designed. A single man receives a commission to build a gigantic ship, and apparently in the middle of dry land! It was an extraordinary command, and it must have called out faith of no ordinary kind in Noah.
A cubit means little today until you turn it into feet.
Its proportions were to be 300 cubits long, 50 cubits broad, and 30 cubits high. If the cubit is taken at 18 inches, its length would have been 450 feet, its breadth 75 feet and its height 45 feet. If the cubit used was 21 inches, the dimensions would be one-sixth larger.
Now compare the ark with the ships built since.
In the whole history of the world up to about a century ago, every other ship ever constructed was a mere shell compared with this. Only in quite recent years have these dimensions been surpassed. But what God said, Noah did, and he proved that God's command was his enabling.
One common objection says the ark was too small to hold the animals. The figures in this verse answer it.
The objection is that the ark was not big enough to "take in all the creatures" — more exactly, the animal races belonging to the dry land. It has been proved, over and over again, that it was. It has been calculated that it was a vessel of more than forty-two thousand tons. That is eighteen times as much as the largest warship. One warship can stow, say, a thousand men, with provisions, for a much longer time than the flood lasted, besides an immense weight of guns, shot and so on. So it is clear the ark could easily have received the animals that could not live in the water.
The ark's shape is unlike a ship built for speed. That is not a flaw.
The shape of the ark was not meant for sailing through storms and waves. But it suited exactly the purpose it was made for. Someone once built a freight ship in the same proportions, for use in quiet waters, and people declared it a great success.
Some treat the flood account as poetry or legend. This verse reads like a builder's brief.
Now it is of the greatest importance to stand firm and unbending in the faith. We are not dealing with poetry and its figures of speech. This is the language of sober history. It deals with facts, and with God's declaration about them… It is the plain and unvarnished statement of fact. The question is: are believers to accept the word of God without hesitation?
Noah's neighbours had every reason to think the plan absurd.
I do not suppose the men of the world thought it was built on the right lines. But he did not care one bit about that. God had given him the lines to build on (verses 14-16), so he did not care how they criticised his ark.
Notice also what the plan left out.
Noah's ship had no pump in it. Indeed it could not. Such a thing would have been a witness against it. It would mean that God's provision was not enough by itself. That could never be. He rested in the seaworthiness of his vessel because of God's appointment and approval of it — indeed, I may say, because of God's building of it. Faith kept his heart quiet about the judgment; hope filled it about the coming glory.
Commentators read the ark as a picture of Christ. The plan came from God, not from man.
It was entirely of God. He devised the ark, and gave Noah its specifications. The storm might rage, both above it and around it, but the ark was never submerged. "The ark floated on the face of the waters." A type of Him who bore the storm of divine wrath on behalf of all His people. The greatness of His person made Him equal to so mighty a work.
- Designed. God was the Architect and Noah the builder; the measurements came down as a command, not a suggestion.
- Measured. At an 18-inch cubit the ark was about 450 feet long, 75 broad and 45 high — unmatched by any ship until modern times.
- Ample. At over forty-two thousand tons, the ark had room to spare for every land animal.
- Factual. The passage reads as sober history, not poetry or legend, and asks whether we will take God's word as it stands.
- Trusted. Noah built on the lines God gave him and ignored the critics. He rested in a vessel God Himself designed — a picture of Christ, who bore the storm and was never submerged.
A light shalt thou make to the ark; and to a cubit high shalt thou finish it above. And the door of the ark shalt thou set in its side [with] a lower, second, and third [story] shalt thou make it.
God's last instructions for the ark sound purely practical: an opening for light, a door in the side, and three decks. Commentators read each detail two ways — as a building plan, and as a picture of how God saves.
The plan came from God; the work came from Noah. One writer explains why each feature sat where it did.
Noah was the builder but God was the Designer of the ark. The door was in the side, so people could get in easily. The window was above, to let in light from heaven and to shut out any view of the flood waters soon to come. Its dimensions were large. The cubit is reckoned to have been 18 to 22 inches long. The ark was made only to float, not shaped like a ship for travel, so its capacity must have been very great.
Another writer reads these instructions as plain fact, not as a story.
This is not poetry with its figures of speech. It is the language of sober history, dealing with facts and with God's declaration about them. It is the plain, unvarnished statement of fact.
One dictionary explains the Hebrew word here, and the question the cubit raises.
A window was to be made to the ark. Gen. 6:16. The word tsohar means "a place of light." It was probably set in the roof, and may have served for ventilation as well as for giving light. In Gen. 6:16, after speaking of the window, it says, "and finish it to a cubit above." Does this refer to the size of the window, or does the word "it" refer to the ark? It has been said that the word rendered "it" is feminine and cannot refer to "window," which is masculine. So the cubit may refer to the roof: the middle of the roof raised a cubit to give it a pitch.
Commentators differ on the exact form of the opening. One suggests a continuous gap running around the vessel:
It may be that the window "finished — to a cubit from the top" was an opening that encircled the whole ark, giving full ventilation, but able to be closed.
The window sat at the top, and that fixed where those inside could look.
The Lord secured the door with His own all-powerful hand. He left Noah the window. From it Noah could look upward to the place from which all the judgement had come, and see that no judgement remained for him. The saved family could only look upward, because the window was "above." They could not see the waters of judgement, nor the death and desolation which those waters had caused.
God carried them; they did not steer.
The passengers in that wonderfully guided and protected vessel did not need their eyes for steering. They were not to look out on the solemn scenes of the judgment taking effect around them. Meanwhile the waters, which were the grave of the world, floated them above its mountain-tops up to the blue heavens, growing calmer as they rose. What a time for them — shut in by God, with God! And what a preparation for the new life they were to begin in the world beyond the flood!
A ship that size might be expected to have several ways in.
One door is mentioned, which may seem too little for so large a ship, but it pictures the fact that Christ alone is the door of salvation for mankind.
Noah did not fasten himself in.
Remember the Lord's own hand shut Noah and his family in the ark, which was made judgment-proof outside and inside. God Himself secured the door. None could enter, and none could get out. "The Lord shut him in." God took charge of the door — safety — while Noah looked out of the window above — communion.
Commentators have seen growth in the three levels, though the shelter is equal on every floor.
It had rooms — varied ages, orders and families of salvation, but one Christ. It had three floors: that is, there is development in Christ — progress to higher and still higher levels. But clearly all who are "in Christ" have perfect salvation. That is no matter of degree or attainment. Salvation is as complete for the small timid animal creeping for refuge onto its lowest deck as for Noah on its topmost floor — no more and no less.
- Designed — God gave the plan; Noah gave the work. Every feature was God's choice, and the record reads as sober history, not poetry.
- Door — one entrance only, set in the side for easy access. It points to a single way of rescue. God shut it, and no one could open it.
- Light — the word means "a place of light," probably set in the roof. Commentators differ on whether the cubit measures the window or the pitch of the roof.
- Above — the opening faced upward, so those inside saw heaven, not the flood. The door was God's work; the window was theirs.
- Decks — three floors suggest growth in Christ. But the shelter is equal: the timid creature on the lowest deck is as safe as Noah on the top.
For I, behold, I bring a flood of waters on the earth, to destroy all flesh under the heavens in which is the breath of life everything that is on the earth shall expire.
God speaks to Noah before He acts, naming both what He will send and how far it will reach. It raises three questions. Whose act was this? How far did it reach? And why was it announced so long before it came?
God does not say the flood will simply happen. He says He Himself is bringing it. And He has given the same kind of warning about a judgment still to come.
God gave warning of the flood well in advance, and there was no doubt of its coming. It would destroy every living thing on earth (v. 17). In the same way, God has given advance warning of another judgment. He has appointed a day when He will judge the world by the Man He has ordained, the Lord Jesus Christ (Acts 17:31). Men may mock at this, but it will come just as surely as the flood came. It is not simply that God allowed it to come, but He insists, "I, even I am bringing the flood of water upon the earth."
(He quotes an older translation, where God's own "I" is doubled for emphasis.)
God often works in hidden ways behind the scenes. This judgment was not one of them.
The flood was not one of God's hidden works of providence, like the kind we see in the story of Esther. That story is important in itself, and we learn much from it. But the flood was a judgment God inflicted, and prophecy made it known beforehand. It was also worldwide. That set it apart from other times God stepped in, however real and instructive those were, and made it fit to compare with the days of the Son of man.
Years passed between God's word and the water. Noah spent them building, and the building itself was a warning.
Here we see the patience of God. He bore long with the sinners before the flood and gave them space to repent. Every day that Noah worked at the ark, every plank, every nail, every stroke of his hammer was a warning and a threat of the coming judgment. And more than that: God could do nothing until Noah was safe in the ark, after He Himself had shut him in.
The verse does not single out the worst offenders. Its terms take in everyone.
"The Lord said, I will destroy man." Nothing less would do. What had corrupted God's way on the earth had to be destroyed completely. "The mighty men, and men of renown" had to be swept away too, with no exceptions. "All flesh" had to be set aside as wholly unfit for God. "The end of all flesh is come before me." This was not the end of some flesh only. No — all of it was corrupt in the sight of the Lord, all of it past saving.
Some have read these words as covering only one region. One writer answers that they mean the whole earth.
I believe the flood covered the whole earth, wherever man was. There is no mistake about it. Some have questioned that, speaking in general terms, as if it only covered the inhabited earth. But Scripture says, "the mountains were covered," and "the tops of the mountains were seen," and so on. That sounds like the whole earth. Either way, you have to allow for a miracle... The flood's universality, complete universality, seems to me to be plainly meant, because it destroyed the world that existed then. God puts an end to the whole system of the world.
One writer reads the flood, and the ark riding above it, as a picture of the death of Christ.
The flood that came, waters covering everything so that the end of all flesh arrived, is a picture of the death of Christ. In His death God passed judgment on all flesh and carried it out. The waves and billows rolled over His innocent head. He passed through death and judgment for us and has made Himself our perfect ark, our hiding place. In Him we are lifted above the judgment waters.
- God brings it. The flood is not fate or nature acting alone. God says He Himself brings it. And He has fixed a day to judge the world by Christ.
- God announces it. God often works unseen. Not here. Prophecy announced this judgment before it fell, and its worldwide reach makes it the pattern of the day of the Son of man.
- God waits before it. Every plank and hammer stroke of the ark was a warning; the judgment could not fall until Noah was safely shut inside.
- God spares nothing in it. "All flesh" means all — not the worst sample of humanity, but the whole condition God had judged as unfit for Him.
- God provides through it. The waters that ended one world carried the ark above them. The death that fell on all flesh fell on Christ. He lifts everyone in Him above the judgment.
But with thee will I establish my covenant; and thou shalt go into the ark, thou, and thy sons, and thy wife, and thy sons' wives with thee.
God has just announced the end of all flesh. Now He makes a promise to one man and his household — a covenant given before a drop of rain fell.
God speaks this promise while the ark is still only an instruction. One writer notes where the word "covenant" first appears, and how the promise is filled out later.
"I will establish my covenant with you" had been God's word to Noah, before the ark was made, or the waters had come (Gen. 6:18). Now the judgment is past, and the new earth is inherited. So God sets that covenant out in full, and pledges it again, to His elect (Gen. 9:8-17). And it is here that the word "covenant" is first used.
The same writer weighs what the promise says about the earth's future.
"Everything that is on the earth shall die," says the Lord to him, "but I will establish my covenant with you." So He discloses the secret: God would establish the earth according to His own purpose, in resurrection, stability, and beauty.
The verse holds two settled decisions side by side, and the second is as firm as the first.
However, if God ordained judgment, He ordained salvation just as surely. God established a covenant with Noah to this effect: He would preserve Noah and his family by means of the ark. They were the only exception to the awesome destruction of man's civilization.
Knowing the outcome in advance did not spare Noah the years of work.
So God made His intention known to the man who believed Him. He would deliver Noah, his wife and his family in the way appointed. Carrying this out was a fitting and remarkable test of Noah's faith. It meant a long time of waiting, continuous labour, and entire but active submission to God's word. Noah kept two things before his spirit. First, the world was doomed, and judgment would fall on it at God's hand because of its wrongdoing. Second, he and his family would without doubt be sheltered from it in the ark, with the creatures needed to renew the world after the flood.
The shelter named here is not for Noah alone. His household enters on the strength of his faith, not their own.
The same ark that lay open to him lay open to them also. Why? Was it because they had faith? No; but because he had, and they were connected with him. God gave him a blank cheque for himself and his family, and it fell to him to fill it up by bringing them in along with him.
Translations differ over one word here. Some read "go into the ark." One writer defends "come," and finds the gospel in the difference.
God does not say, Go into the ark, but Come into the ark. He was "in Christ" (2 Cor. 5:19), and when He invites them to Christ, He invites them to Himself. When the storm-threatened traveller comes to make the divine Ark his refuge and home, he finds that Another is there to welcome him. God has made it His own retreat and tent… The word is altered to 'go' in a current translation of Genesis. I cannot see any ground for this needless change. It is true that boh is sometimes rendered 'go', when the context seems to require it. But in the vast majority of cases where it is used, it means 'come'.
The details of its build carry the meaning — a window above, and a single door.
The ark had a window above — looking towards Heaven and not upon the earth and its judgment beneath. It had one door and only one, in the side. All of it applies wonderfully to Christ and salvation. The flood of waters came and covered everything, so that the end of all flesh came. That flood is a picture of the death of Christ. In His death, sentence was passed on all flesh and carried out. The waves and billows rolled over His innocent head. He passed through death and judgment for us. He has made Himself our perfect ark, our hiding place. In Him we are lifted above the judgment waters.
- Covenant — Scripture's first covenant is spoken here, before the ark was built or the waters came. God sets it out in full after the flood.
- Purpose — Everything on the earth would die. Yet the promise held an earth established according to God's purpose — in resurrection, stability and beauty.
- Certainty — God ordained judgment. He ordained salvation just as surely. The ark was the one exception He had fixed.
- Household — The ark lay open to Noah's family because it lay open to him. His faith, not theirs, brought them in.
- Refuge — The call is "come," not "go." God made the ark His own dwelling, so the one who enters finds Another there. Christ is that ark now: He passed through judgment, and in Him we are lifted above the waters.
And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every [sort] shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep [them] alive with thee they shall be male and female.
God has announced the flood and ordered the ark; now He turns to its cargo — not just eight people, but a living sample of every kind of creature on earth. Why rescue animals from a judgment caused by human sin, and why two of each?
The name used for God in this chapter shapes the instruction. One writer says the order here is about the Maker keeping His creatures alive, not about His moral dealings with anyone.
So in Genesis 6 it says that "the earth was corrupt in God's sight, and the earth was filled with violence." It is not "Jehovah" now but "God." … What does He do then? He directs the ark to be made. For what end? The preservation of the creatures that needed the ark. So He orders that two of every kind should be taken into the ark. We can easily see how fitting this is. It is simply a measure for keeping the creature in being by God the Creator, despite the judgment about to fall. It has nothing to do with moral relationships. … Here, then, we only hear of pairs entering.
Genesis 7 tells Noah to take clean animals by sevens. Some critics call that a second, contradictory account. One writer answers that the twos and the sevens belong together in one text, under the two names for God found there.
When Jehovah is stating His thoughts about Noah, and giving His directions about His relationship with man and the earth, He tells Noah to take clean animals by sevens — still two and two, male and female. And they all go in two and two, as God had commanded. This ties the two names together in the text itself in a way that would make separating them difficult. The reason for distinguishing the clean animals (still two and two, male and female) is too obvious to cause the smallest difficulty. The twos refer, moreover, to male and female on a general principle. A person must be very hard pressed for a difficulty, or for a discovery, to find a contradiction here.
Gathering the pairs was part of a long assignment, with nothing to go on but God's word. Two settled convictions carried Noah through it.
Carrying this out was a fitting and remarkable test of Noah's faith. It involved a long wait, continuous labour, and complete but active submission to God's word. Noah kept two things before his spirit all the time. On the one hand, the world was doomed, and judgment would fall on it from God's hand because of its sins. On the other, he and his family would without doubt be sheltered from it in the ark, with the creatures needed to renew the world that would come after the flood.
The creatures aboard point beyond the flood itself.
The animals, clean and unclean, taken into the ark, along with the birds of the air, give us the hint that creation will share the blessed effects of salvation. The later prophetic word, and Romans 8:19-23, tell us of a coming deliverance of groaning creation.
Another writer goes further and uses the language of redemption.
Some of every sort are carried with Noah from the place of death into the ark of salvation. The "eight souls," as Peter calls them, but with them remnants of the animals of the earth, small and great, winged birds and creeping things — all are housed and redeemed together with Noah.
Critics said no ship could hold them all. One writer answers from the ark's own size.
It has been proved, over and over again, that the ark was big enough. People have calculated that it was a vessel of more than forty-two thousand tons: four hundred and fifty feet long, seventy-five broad, and forty-five high. That is eighteen times as much as the largest warship. One warship can stow, say, a thousand men, with provisions, for a far longer time than the flood lasted, besides an immense weight of guns and shot. So it is clear that the ark could easily have received the animals that could not live in the water.
Commentators read the ark as a picture of Christ. It carries its passengers through judgment into what lies beyond.
The ark is Christ, and the flood it saves through is the judgment of the whole world, which perished in it. Those preserved come through to a new world that emerges from the waters. There the sweet savour of accepted sacrifice secures lasting blessing.
- Creator. Here God acts as Maker. The pairs keep every kind alive through a judgment aimed at human sin.
- Command. Two of each, male and female, is the least life needs to continue. The sevens of chapter 7 serve another purpose. They are not a rival account.
- Carried. Two certainties carried Noah through the long wait: the world was doomed, and the ark would hold.
- Creation. The animals sheltered with Noah hint that creation itself will share in the deliverance promised in Romans 8.
- Comes through. Everyone inside comes out into a new world. The ark pictures Christ: in Him you pass through judgment rather than around it.
Of fowl after their kind, and of the cattle after their kind, of every creeping thing of the ground after its kind, two of each shall go in to thee, to keep [them] alive.
God's instructions to Noah move from building the ark to filling it. Noah does not hunt the animals down; they come in to him. Two questions sit inside the verse. Why did God save the animals at all? And why do the pairs here become sevens of the clean animals one chapter later?
Here God acts as Maker of the earth, not in moral dealings with a person. One writer ties the pairs to that.
Then what does He do? He directs the ark to be made. For what purpose? The preservation of the creatures that needed the ark. So He orders that two of every kind should be taken into the ark. We can easily see why this is fitting. It is simply a measure by God the Creator to keep the creature going, despite the judgment about to fall. It has nothing to do with moral relationships.
Readers often stumble at the different numbers given in Genesis 6 and Genesis 7. The difference tracks the two names of God used in the two passages, and the animals themselves settle the matter by entering in pairs.
In the accounts where Elohim gives directions for saving the different kinds of creatures, He directs that two of every sort be taken, male and female, to keep them alive. Nothing could be simpler than the meaning of this. Jehovah then states His thoughts about Noah, and gives His directions about His relationship with man and the earth. He tells Noah to take clean animals by sevens, still two and two, male and female. And they all go in two and two, as Elohim had commanded.
The animals move toward Noah. One writer turns that into a warning for people today.
From east, west, north, and south, the hand of God gathered the dumb creatures. The people must have thought it strange when those animals went in. They were wiser than men. They obeyed the call of God. Men would not then, and many will not now, so God says, "The ox knows its owner, and the donkey its master's crib, but Israel does not know, my people do not understand" (Isa. 1:3). These animals knew the call of their Creator, and they passed in safely, but man paid no attention.
The phrase looks past the flood. What enters the ark will renew the world after the flood. Noah had to hold that in mind through years of building.
Carrying this out was a fitting and remarkable test of Noah's faith. It meant a long wait, continuous labour, and complete but active submission to God's word. Noah kept two things constantly before his spirit. One: the world was doomed, and judgment would fall on it from God's hand because of its sins. The other: he and his family would without doubt be sheltered from it in the ark, with the creatures needed to renew the world that would come after the flood.
The creatures kept alive point past their own survival.
The animals, clean and unclean, taken into the ark, along with the birds of the air, hint that creation will share in the blessed effects of salvation. The later prophetic word, and Romans 8:19-23, tell us of a coming deliverance for groaning creation.
One writer reads the ark that held them all as a picture of something greater.
For plainly, the ark is Christ, and the flood it saves through is the judgment of the whole world, which perished in it. Those preserved come through to a new world which rises out of the waters. There the sweet aroma of accepted sacrifice secures lasting blessing.
- Creator. The pairs are God acting as Maker, keeping every kind alive through the coming judgment.
- Call. The creatures are not captured but come; they answered the call of their Creator when men would not.
- Count. Two here, sevens of the clean later. That is not a contradiction. Elohim, the Creator, orders the pairs; Jehovah, dealing with Noah in relationship, names the sevens.
- Continuity. "To keep them alive" means the ark carried the seed of the world to come. Noah's long labour was faith holding onto that.
- Christ. Writers read the ark as a figure of Christ. The flood falls, the vessel rises, and everything inside — man and creature alike — reaches a new world.
And take thou of all food that is eaten, and gather [it] to thee, that it may be for food for thee and for them.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Noah did it; according to all that God had commanded him, so did he.
Genesis 6 ends with judgment announced and an ark measured out in detail. Nothing here tells us how Noah felt about the task — only that he did what God said, and did all of it.
Nothing in the world around Noah supported what he had been told. The word itself held him steady.
All that the man of faith needs is to know that God has spoken; this imparts perfect certainty to his soul. "Thus says the Lord" settles everything. A single line of Sacred Scripture is a full answer to all the reasonings and all the imaginations of the human mind. When someone has the word of God as the basis of his convictions, he can stand calmly against the full tide of human opinion and prejudice. It was the word of God which sustained the heart of Noah during his long course of service. How could Noah have preached righteousness for 120 years if he had not had the word of God as the ground of his preaching? How could he have withstood the scoffs and sneers of an unbelieving world? How could he have kept on testifying of a judgment to come, when not a cloud appeared on the world's horizon? Impossible.
The plan came with the command. That left Noah with only one concern.
So Noah started on his great work of preparing an ark to save his household. God was the Architect, so Noah did not need to worry about its design. His only concern must have been to carry out rightly what God had designed. A single man receives a commission to build a gigantic ship, and that, it seems, in the middle of dry land! … But what God said, Noah did, and he proved that God's command was his enabling.
The verse says it twice: Noah did it, and he did all of it. His response matches the instructions in every detail.
The great thing to notice in Noah, warned of the coming catastrophe, is his simple obedience to the voice of God. God gave the dimensions of the ark — the window, the door, and the different decks. Noah made every part of it exactly as God commanded.
That obedience has a root. It grows out of faith, and it runs the opposite way to a life steered by sight.
In Hebrews 11 we find the principle of his walk. It was faith, not sight… It was faith working holy obedience — "Noah did this; he did all that God commanded him." How simple, how blessed, and how opposite to the walk by sense and sight! That walk leads us in self-will to do the very thing God commanded not to be done.
This was not a single decision. He had to take the task up again every morning, while nothing in the sky changed.
Carrying this out was a fitting and remarkable test of Noah's faith. It meant a long time of waiting, continuous labour, and complete but active submission to God's word. Noah kept two things before his spirit at all times. One was that the world was doomed, and that judgment would fall on it at God's hand because of its sins. The other was that he and his family would beyond doubt find shelter from it in the ark.
Doing all that God commanded also meant looking absurd for the whole stretch of it.
Faith here for a hundred and twenty years seemed to be a fool. Noah was building a ship for dry ground. His neighbours may well have mocked him. But he saw the thing that was invisible.
The command was not a burden laid on Noah for its own sake.
He had only to build an ark according to God's command. He would soon find he was building something for his own safety. Obedience was his blessing.
For readers now, the shelter is not one we construct.
Noah's faith recognised that the world was a judged scene… Noah prepared an ark for the saving of his house. We do not have to prepare an ark. But we have to accept the shelter of the death of Christ, and the end of all flesh before God. Then we find how the power of God's salvation carries us through a judged scene.
- God spoke. "Thus says the Lord" settled everything for Noah. The word, not the weather, was the ground he stood on.
- God designed. God was the Architect of the ark. Noah's one concern was to build exactly what God had designed — and God's command was his enabling.
- Noah did all. Window, door, decks, dimensions: he made every part exactly as God commanded. Faith working holy obedience — the opposite of walking by sight.
- Noah kept doing. For a hundred and twenty years he waited, worked and submitted. The neighbours laughed at a ship on dry ground.
- Noah was saved. He built for God and found he had built his own safety — obedience was his blessing. We build nothing; we take shelter in the death of Christ.
And Jehovah said to Noah, Go into the ark, thou and all thy house; for thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation.
Genesis 7 opens with God speaking to one man while the rest of the world stands under sentence. Two phrases carry the weight of the verse: "you and all your household," and "I have seen that you are righteous before me in this generation."
The previous chapter speaks of God as Creator. Here the name is Jehovah — the LORD. One writer says the whole tone changes with it.
It is no longer the faithful Creator merely, but special relationship, and ends of a higher and more intimate nature. So we have a quite new call to the patriarch as one who had found grace in the eyes of Jehovah and was righteous before Him.
The instructions that follow point the same way. The clean animals come by sevens, the unclean by twos — a difference no mere rescue operation would need.
"Come into the ark," He says, "for I have seen that you are righteous before me in this generation." "Righteous" — is this about creation as such? It is not; it is about moral relationship... God is not just providing for the survival of the creature. He is providing, with marked completeness, for sacrifice.
Genesis says Noah found grace before it says God saw him righteous. The order matters.
But "Noah found grace in the eyes of Jehovah," that is, divine favour rested on him; righteous in himself, no doubt, but all through grace of course... In the next chapter God says of Noah, "You I have seen righteous before me in this generation." But the earth was completely filled with violence.
One writer marks the difference between Noah and a believer today.
Only of Noah could God say, "You I have seen righteous before Me in this generation" (Gen. 7:1). Righteousness for men was not fully accomplished until the death and resurrection of Christ. Noah became an heir of that righteousness. The believer of today is not an heir of righteousness, for he has it.
The ESV reads "Go into the ark," while older translations read "Come." Commentators differ over how much the verb carries. One finds real beauty in "Come":
God does not say, Go into the ark, but Come into the ark: He was "in Christ" (2 Cor. 5:19), and when He invites them to Christ, He invites them to Himself. The traveller under threat of the storm comes to make the divine Ark his refuge and home. He discovers that Another is there to welcome him.
Another writer holds that the verb is not decisive:
A good deal is sometimes made of the word "Come"... The verb may be either, as best suits the context. Where no emphasis of this kind is called for, either word may be used correctly, as here.
This verse is where a pattern in God's dealings first surfaces.
The first verse of Genesis 7 gives us the first instance of how God links a man's house with himself in His dealings with men on earth. Here "you and all your household" occurs for the first time. Salvation from judgment poured out on earth is before us here, but in Acts 16:31 the same principle holds good in regard to eternal salvation.
Did the rest of the family qualify on their own? One writer answers from what happened later.
Someone may object that all the members of the household were probably "righteous" before God too. But the later history of one of them — Ham (Gen. 9:22-25) — forbids the thought. So the statement loses none of its force: God delivered Noah's family from the judgment of the flood because of the faith of its head. True, it was not salvation itself; but it was a picture of it (1 Peter 3:20-21).
Verse 1 calls Noah in. Verse 16 completes it: God shuts the door with His own hand.
Jehovah Himself had invited him in. We read in Genesis 7:1, "Come, you and all your household, into the ark." And when he had taken his place there, we read, "the LORD shut him in." Here was full and perfect security for all within. Jehovah kept the door... The Lord secured the door with His own almighty hand. He left Noah the window. From it Noah could look upward to the place where all the judgment had come from, and see that no judgment remained for him.
- Grace first. Noah found grace before God called him righteous. His righteous walk flowed from that favour, not the other way round.
- Grace names. God is named Jehovah here, not simply Creator. That marks a relationship, not just the saving of a species — and the animals taken for sacrifice confirm it.
- Grace invites. One writer hears a call to come, with God Himself already inside the refuge to welcome Noah. Another holds that the verb settles nothing.
- Grace widens. "You and all your household" appears for the first time here. Ham's later history shows God spared the house through the faith of its head.
- Grace secures. God invited Noah in, then shut him in. He left only a window facing up — the hand that sent the flood held the door.
Of all clean beasts thou shalt take to thee by sevens, a male and its female; but of the beasts that are not clean two, a male and its female.
Noah's last instructions before the flood single out one difference: the clean animals come aboard in sevens, the unclean only in pairs. That raises two questions — why God wants more of one kind, and how Noah knew which was which before any law listed them.
Two names for God run through the flood story. One writer ties the difference in numbers to the difference in names.
As to the "two of every sort" in chapter 7, and the "seven clean" in verses 2 and 3: the first were male and female, to keep them alive. When they were clean beasts, he took fourteen. I have no doubt the "clean" animals were the ones people usually offered in sacrifice. Who would offer a ravenous wild beast in sacrifice to God, but sheep or oxen? This difference between provision for the race and provision for sacrifice is tied to the different use of the two names: God (Elohim) and the LORD (Jehovah).
The way God speaks here shows more than concern for survival.
Is this only about keeping the creatures alive? No. It is the language of One who has special relationships with Noah and with his family… God is providing not merely for the creature to continue, but with marked completeness for sacrifice. So we see His perfect care to maintain His rights and His place as the One who governed morally.
The ESV reads "seven pairs" here, while older translations read "by sevens," and commentators differ on the count. Read as seven animals, six make three breeding pairs. The one left over has another purpose, seen when Noah steps out onto dry ground.
And now we discover why the clean animals were taken into the ark in sevens and the unclean only in twos… But why the odd one in the seven? Because they were to be offered as a burnt offering at the very start of the renewed earth. The Lord knew the flood had made no change in human nature. Even in Noah and his family it was the same after the flood as before… so from the very start the new world could only continue on the basis of sacrifice.
The command in the ark and the altar after it belong together, and the whole standing of the world after the flood rests on what happened there.
So we find Jehovah directing Noah to take to him of all clean animals by sevens, but of those not clean two, a male and its female, to enter the ark. And on this Noah acted when after the deluge he built an altar as his first recorded act, and offered up burnt offerings of every clean beast and of all clean birds. For the tenure of the post-flood earth hung on sacrifice.
The word "clean" later covers what may be eaten. Here it cannot mean that yet.
The first time we read of clean and unclean animals is when Noah went into the ark… We are not told how Noah told them apart. But it shows that in early days there was a distinction between clean and unclean. Those called 'clean' were doubtless clean for sacrifice, and not for food. Nothing is said of man eating animal food till after the flood, and then God gave "every moving thing" for food.
Scripture never says where Noah got his list, and commentators differ. One writer argues from the moral teaching in the later law:
Noah knew well before the flood which creatures made an acceptable sacrifice (Gen. 7:2), though how he learned it was never recorded. But in the law we read God's own definition of clean beasts and clean birds, and we find moral teaching tied to the subject (Lev. 11). We must conclude that no man could have discovered by natural intuition which creatures God would count clean and which He would not.
Darby does not settle the question.
It may have been instinct in man in a way at first, and that God put His positive sanction on it when He gave the law.
Some readers set this verse against the earlier order to bring in two of every sort, as if two accounts had been stitched together. On the other reading, the sevens are counted in pairs.
The LORD (Jehovah) is stating His thoughts about Noah and giving His directions about His relationship with man and the earth. So He tells Noah to take clean beasts by sevens, still two and two, male and female. And they all go in two and two, as God (Elohim) had commanded. The text itself ties the two names together in a way that would make separating them difficult… You would have to be very hard pressed for a difficulty, or for a discovery, to find a contradiction here.
- Name. The order for sevens comes from the LORD, not just from God the Creator. It speaks of relationship, not only of keeping species alive.
- Purpose. The extra clean beasts are for sacrifice, beyond the pairs needed to keep every kind alive.
- Seventh. On one reading, the odd animal in each seven has no mate. It goes on the altar when the ark opens.
- Foundation. Human nature came out of the flood unchanged, so the renewed earth could only stand on sacrifice.
- Knowledge. The clean and unclean line was known before any written law. Writers differ on whether God taught him or whether it began as instinct that God later confirmed.
Also of the fowl of the heavens by sevens, male and female; to keep seed alive on the face of all the earth.
Genesis 7 opens with the LORD calling Noah into the ark and sorting the animals into two groups: pairs of most kinds, sevens of the clean. Verse 3 puts the birds in the larger group, and gives the reason: to keep their offspring alive across the whole earth.
Commentators read the extra animals as provision for sacrifice, not just a surplus for breeding. The writers quoted here use an older translation, which says "by sevens" where the ESV says "seven pairs."
As to the "two of every sort" in chapter 7, and "seven clean" in verses 2, 3, the first were male and female, to keep them alive; when they were clean beasts, he took fourteen. I have no doubt the "clean" were the ones people usually gave for sacrifices. Who would offer a ravenous wild beast in sacrifice to God, but sheep or oxen?
Commentators differ on the count. Others read seven animals, with one left over after three pairs, and find that odd one's purpose on the far side of the flood.
And now we discover why Noah took the clean animals into the ark in sevens and the unclean only in twos… But why the odd one in the seven? Because Noah was to offer them up as a burnt offering at the very start of the renewed earth. The Lord knew that the flood had made no change in human nature… and so from the very start the new world could only continue on the basis of sacrifice.
The instructions in chapter 6 and those here use different names for God. Writers treat that change as the key to the different numbers. The older translation says "Jehovah" where the ESV says "the LORD."
The first mention is this: "Two of every sort shall come to you, Noah, to keep them alive." That is God's (Elohim's) care of His creatures, to preserve every kind alive on the earth. But when we read of His taking "of every clean beast by sevens, his male and his female," it is God as Jehovah who speaks. And why? Because He is now arranging, as in relationship with man, for sacrifices — types of Christ.
The birds of the air, named in this verse, are read along the same line — not merely creatures preserved, but a supply held ready for God.
It is God providing not for the perpetuation of the creature merely, but with marked completeness for sacrifice. As a result we have this perfect care over the maintenance of His rights and place as One who governed morally. "And Noah did according to all that Jehovah commanded."
Some readers set the "two of every sort" of chapter 6 against the sevens here and see a clash. One writer answers that the text itself ties the two accounts together.
Jehovah states His thoughts about Noah, and gives His directions about His relationship with man and the earth. So He tells Noah to take clean beasts by sevens — still two and two, male and female. And they all go in two and two, as Elohim had commanded. That ties the two names together in the text itself, in a way that would make separating them difficult… The birds of the air, which went in by sevens, plainly mean clean ones too, as Genesis 8:20 shows.
Nothing here explains what makes a creature clean. The verse takes it for granted that Noah already knows.
As a general principle, the difference between clean and unclean was known in early days. So we find Jehovah directing Noah to take all clean animals by sevens. But of those not clean he was to take two, a male and its female, into the ark. Noah acted on this. After the flood, his first recorded act was to build an altar and offer up burnt offerings of every clean beast and of all clean birds. For the tenure of the post-flood earth hung on sacrifice.
The reason given in verse 3 looks past the ark to the whole earth. One writer explains why the larger number mattered.
Had there been only "two of every sort," offering some in sacrifice would have put an end to those particular kinds of creatures. So the "sevens" left plenty of room both for sacrifices and "to keep seed alive on the face of all the earth."
Another writer looks further ahead, to what the rescued animals point toward.
The beasts, clean and unclean, taken into the ark, as well as the birds of the air, give us the hint that creation will share the blessed effects of salvation. The later prophetic word, and Romans 8:19-23, tell us of a coming deliverance of groaning creation.
- Preserved. Every kind enters in pairs. After the judgment the earth still has its living creatures. The waters carry creation through; they do not sweep it away.
- Doubled. The clean beasts and birds go in by sevens. That is more than survival needs, because sacrifice is in view as well as breeding.
- Offered. The extra clean animals meet the altar Noah builds when he steps out. The renewed world begins on the ground of sacrifice.
- Named. God the Creator commands the pairs. The LORD commands the sevens, speaking as One in relationship with man. The two names explain the two numbers; they do not contradict each other.
- Widened. The purpose reaches "the face of all the earth." The sevens leave room for sacrifice and for survival. Commentators see in the rescued animals a hint that creation itself will share in salvation.
For in yet seven days I will cause it to rain on the earth forty days and forty nights; and every living being which I have made will I destroy from the ground.
God has already told Noah to go into the ark. Now He starts a clock. One week of waiting, then rain for forty days and nights, then everything He made wiped off the ground. Why the extra week? What does forty mean? And why is rain named here for the first time in the Bible?
Earlier God had told Noah in general terms that judgment was coming. This verse fixes the timing down to the day.
God warned Noah about things not yet seen, both on the ground of a special relationship and on the ground of His nature. Genesis 7:4 then follows that general warning with precise details. Just as it was predicted, so it happened, right on time, as Scripture plainly states. No history could be more exact, or more full of detail in so few words.
The world had already had one hundred and twenty years of warning. This last week was extra.
At last the one hundred and twenty promised years ran out, and then God gave a guilty world seven extra days of grace... He did not promise these seven days, but He gave them. How like God. There is no promise of seven days of grace to you. Come to Jesus today.
Those seven days also gave one last piece of evidence: the animals streaming into the ark. One writer suggests the delay worked the other way on people's minds.
Men saw the huge number of animals coming to the ark. Then they saw Noah's whole family go into this finished, giant vessel. By then, at least, they ought to have realized that this project did not come out of Noah's imagination... But God gave men another week to change their minds. Perhaps, as those few days passed, people grew more confident each day that nothing was going to happen, instead of getting seriously worried.
Until this verse, Scripture never mentions water falling from the sky. Genesis 2 describes another way the ground got its water.
Genesis 2:6 shows that a mist rose from the earth itself and kept the plant life alive, with no water coming down from above. There were waters "above the firmament" (Genesis 1:7), but they had not yet come down as showers on the earth. Not until Genesis 7:4 do we read of rain. Some think that the watering of the earth by mist and not rain persisted until the time of the flood. It may have been so.
Forty days and nights is not a random number. One writer traces the same span through Scripture, and shows where the 120 years came from.
The flood came down for forty days, and that number shows a period of testing. God tested Israel forty days while He gave the law, and forty years in all in the wilderness. The Lord was tempted forty days. Spies searched Canaan for forty days. Jonah's warning call to Nineveh was forty days... But God's patience sometimes lengthens the time of testing. In that case forty is multiplied again by three, the divine number, bringing us to 120. That is the time through which the long-suffering of God waited while Noah preached. Notice that this testing, while it destroys all else, lifts the ark up on its surface (Gen. 7:18).
The threat covers every living thing, and it fell exactly as God said. But it never fell without notice.
God never destroys without warning. So He gave a hundred and twenty years' notice of the coming ruin. Through those years men had the ministry of "Noah, a preacher of righteousness." In that scornful age the result was nothing: no one was saved but Noah and his household... Seven days after the hand of God shut the door of the ark, the blow fell, and the rain kept falling for forty days and forty nights without a break.
One writer asks how that generation could be caught out after so much warning.
"They did not know." Had they not had plenty of testimony? Plenty. For a hundred and twenty years Noah, the "preacher of righteousness," pointed to the coming storm, which Enoch had predicted too. They had plenty of testimony, but they paid no attention to it. How dull their ears were! People were taken by surprise in Noah's day, and so will they be when He Himself returns to judge the earth as Son of Man.
- Warned — God gave notice first. One hundred and twenty years of Noah's preaching, then a date for what was coming.
- Given — the seven days were an extra mercy, not part of the original promise; God added time no one had asked for.
- Wasted — the extra week may have hardened rather than softened. As nothing happened day by day, people grew more confident, not more concerned.
- Tested — forty is the span of testing all through Scripture. The same waters that destroyed everything else lifted the ark.
- Repeated — Jesus tied this scene to His own return. The verdict on that generation: they did not know until the flood came.
And Noah did according to all that Jehovah had commanded him.
Genesis 7:5 closes God's final instructions before the flood: Noah did every single thing he was told. But what had God commanded, why is He called "the LORD" here, and what makes a man act on a warning about something no one has ever seen?
The commands in view came just before: which animals to take, and a countdown of seven days. One writer finds kindness in that short delay.
Next, we see the LORD's thoughtful care. He gave notice of only seven days before the flood, so that Noah and his family could enjoy their deliverance, and the goodness of their Deliverer, with calmer hearts. The world of unbelievers had refused the warning that sounded through one hundred and twenty years. The seven days' notice was a fresh proof of gracious concern for those who believed.
The word "all" carries the weight of the verse. Noah chose nothing for himself, and he left nothing out.
God warned Noah of the coming catastrophe. The great thing to notice in him is his simple obedience to the voice of God. God gave the dimensions of the ark — the window, the door, and the different decks. Noah made everything according to what was commanded.
The names for God shift back and forth across these chapters. One writer traces the pattern and shows that each name is chosen with care.
"Jehovah" is a relationship name, one specially revealed; it is not the Creator's name, the name of the divine Being... The earth (Genesis 6) was corrupt before God as such. Yet the writer always speaks of Jehovah and His dealings. And "God" deals with the earth as so corrupted; again, verse 22, as "God" commanded him, not Jehovah. Then in Genesis 7 Jehovah said to Noah, and as Jehovah (v. 5) commanded him; then as God commanded him (v. 9), and again as God commanded him, and Jehovah shut him in (v. 16).
"Jehovah" is the name printed as "the LORD" in most Bibles. So verse 5 uses the relationship name: the God who spoke to Noah is the God he obeyed.
There was no cloud on the horizon when Noah acted. Everything he did rested on a word about things not yet visible.
When God spoke to Noah of judgment impending, there was no sign of it. It was "not seen as yet"; but the word of God made it a present reality to the heart that was enabled to mix that word with faith. Faith does not wait to see a thing before it believes.
Nor did Noah wait until the plan made sense to him. Understanding came the other way round.
Noah believed what he did not understand at first, and acted on his faith. Soon he got understanding. Faith understands because faith believes God. Where unbelief sees a difficulty, faith does not. Noah believed, acted, and then understood.
Being righteous was not what carried Noah through. Another writer traces where his safety actually came from, and what his obedience said to the world.
Noah's personal character was no exemption from the threatened flood. His life and safety depended solely on his obedience to the warning voice of God. Because he believed in God he listened to this special revelation... Noah was shut into the ark before God brought His word to pass. God shut him in. He made secure His own work of salvation before He laid His judgment on the works of men... He condemned the world by his obedience to the word of God. His testimony was a witness of their madness as they carried on in their old way, paying no attention.
One writer lists this verse among Noah's honours. Then he sets beside it what happened later.
He was an obedient servant; he did according to all that the LORD commanded him (Genesis 7:5)... Despite all this high favour and special experience, as soon as Noah was left to his own will, under Satan's influence he became a slave to lust... We do well to be watchful: "Let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall." ... A Christian may have spent forty years with the highest privileges, in the best conditions for growth toward God. He is still not immune from failure.
- Word. God spoke first — one hundred and twenty years of warning, then seven days' notice, a fresh proof of His concern for those who believed.
- Faith. No sign of a flood was in view. Noah acted on a word about things not seen, and understanding came after the believing.
- Obedience. "All" is the key word: the dimensions, the decks, the door — Noah did every part of it as commanded.
- Shelter. His character did not exempt him from judgment. Obedience put him inside the ark, and God Himself shut the door before the waters came.
- Watchfulness. The same obedient man later fell. The verse honours him, but it does not make him safe: "Let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall."
And Noah was six hundred years old when the flood of waters was on the earth.
Genesis 7:6 fixes the flood to a single point in one man's life: the year he turned six hundred. That small line of chronology marks the end of God's patience with a whole world. It raises two questions: what filled those six hundred years, and why the record changes its tone right here.
Most of Noah's six hundred years pass without a headline. One writer weighs how little the record says about the first four-fifths of that span:
When Noah was born, over a thousand years had passed since sin entered the world, at the lowest estimate. Six hundred years later the flood would sweep away the world of the ungodly. Divide those six hundred years into five equal parts. Four of the five passed with nothing put on record except the all-important fact that he was "a righteous man, blameless in his generation," and that he "walked with God."
That quiet stretch was not wasted time. It was the groundwork for the final fifth:
Four-fifths of the period passed with little happening. Yet during those years this steady walk with God laid the foundation for the activity and the witness of the final fifth — the one hundred and twenty years just before the flood. That was the period when "God's patience waited … while the ark was being prepared" (1 Peter 3:20), and also of the witness Noah gave as "a herald of righteousness" (2 Peter 2:5).
Those closing years were not just construction time. The ark itself preached, plank by plank:
Is not this same care for His people seen in the long respite granted to the people before the flood? Here we see the longsuffering of God, who bore long with the sinners before the flood and gave them room for repentance. Every day that Noah worked at the ark, every plank, every nail, every stroke of his hammer, was a warning and a threat of the coming judgment. More than that, God could do nothing until Noah was safe in the ark, after He Himself had shut him in. Even then there was a respite of seven days (perfect forbearance).
Noah himself worked without knowing the deadline. One writer draws attention to what God withheld:
The Lord God had fixed 120 years as the term of His longsuffering. Noah's preaching, as well as ark-building, was to be for that period. Such was the purpose of God. But Noah was told nothing of this appointed interval. The Lord kept back all mention of the 120 years.
The opening of Genesis 7 says "the LORD," while this verse and the ones after it say "God." One writer reads that change as a move from private favour to public judgment:
The general statement that follows in verses 6-10 confirms the special force of these five verses all the more. There "God" appears rather than Jehovah, and so nothing of moral relationship in particular. Here we have Noah's age when the flood came — six hundred years — and the entrance of himself and all his house into the ark… He who enjoyed the favour of Jehovah had the earlier communication in grace. Nobody could fail to be aware of God's judgment when it came.
The same writer treats the change of names as evidence of design rather than of stitched-together documents:
The theory of Elohistic and Jehovistic documents so fails to account for the use of the divine names, as well as the other features of the text… From verse 6 we have Noah's action in view of Elohim's word as such, where accordingly the entrance of the creatures, clean or unclean, two and two, is named as in Genesis 6; and all the more strikingly here, because in the earlier verses the clean by sevens had been commanded by Jehovah, as suited His dealings with His own.
The record does not stop at Noah's age. A few verses later it gives the day itself:
In verse 11 God gives the date of the beginning of the flood in relation to the age of Noah. He gives not only the general time, but the exact day: the 17th day of the second month, in Noah's 600th year. The many dates, names and places recorded in Scripture are an invitation to anyone to check the accuracy of the word of God as he pleases.
One writer reads Noah as a picture of every believer, and Noah's day as a picture of ours. What made Noah look foolish was how long normal life had lasted:
Noah pictures the believer in general, as one who flees to Christ for refuge from the wrath to come… There is a sense in which the whole time of gospel witness matches Noah's days… It was the long stretch of undisturbed prosperity that made the builder of the ark look like a fool to those whose day was nearly over. In the same way we are warned that the Destroyer will appear when men begin to think that peace and safety are about to crown a world whose earlier generations have seen such strange changes.
- Walk first. Four-fifths of Noah's six hundred years hold no recorded event. The record says only that he was righteous and walked with God. That hidden walk carried the visible work.
- Then witness. The last hundred and twenty years turned that walk into building and preaching. Every hammer stroke was a warning to those who watched.
- Patience has a term. God fixed the length of His longsuffering but never told Noah the number. The builder worked by obedience, not by countdown.
- Then the name changes. From this verse on the record says "God" rather than "Jehovah." Grace had spoken in private. Judgment now lands where no one could miss it.
- And it dates itself. Noah's six hundredth year, second month, seventeenth day. The date is precise enough to check, and the pattern will return.
And Noah went in, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him, into the ark, because of the waters of the flood.
Genesis 7:7 records eight people leaving the old world and stepping into the ark, while the sky was still dry. Why did they go in, and why did a whole household go in on the strength of one man?
Noah moved because of waters no one could see yet. One writer explains what made that possible:
When God spoke to Noah of judgment coming, there was no sign of it. It was "not seen as yet"; but the word of God made it a present reality to the heart that was able to mix that word with faith. Faith does not wait to see a thing before it believes, for "faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ."
(The older translation reads "faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.")
Going in was one plain act, and it cut them off from everything outside:
The last day came, however. Each of the four men and four women took the last decisive step that secured their preservation from destruction. That step came when each of them planted one foot on the ark and lifted the other off the earth under judgment. It was impossible to have one foot in and one foot out. It was either both feet in, or both feet out. This is a useful parable for gospel preachers today. Their action agreed with God's judgment against the world. It also expressed their faith in the way of salvation God had appointed.
The verse names sons, a wife, and sons' wives. Later events rule out the idea that each of them earned a place:
The Lord commands Noah to enter the ark with his house on this ground: "for I have seen that you are righteous before me in this generation." Someone might object that all the members of the household were probably "righteous" before God too. The later history of one of them — Ham — forbids that thought. So nothing weakens the statement: God delivered the family of Noah from the judgment of the flood because of the faith of its head.
One writer notices who was not in that group:
The three sons of Noah, all married men, did not carry one infant into the ark. Eight adult persons passed through the flood. What a touch this is, showing God's thoughtful planning, His arranging and tender care! It turns up in such an unexpected place, and it may well comfort many who face trials in their circumstances.
They entered ahead of the flood, not during it. Their safety rested on whose hand shut them in:
Noah's story was now nothing less than safety and deliverance. He held it with the fullest security and the clearest right, in an hour of most solemn judgment. And this is the salvation of the gospel… The One who decided within Himself to judge the world had also told His chosen ones the way of escape. It was the hand which was about to let the waters out that was now shutting Noah in. Could they then prevail against him? Just as impossible!
Outside, ordinary life carried on to the last hour. One writer asks what was actually wrong with it:
"They were eating and drinking and marrying and being given in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all" (Luke 17:26-27). There was nothing wrong in any of these things, looked at in themselves. The wrong was not in the things done, but in the doers of them. They could do every one of these things in the fear of the Lord, and to the glory of His holy name, if only they did them in faith.
Entering was not the end of the story. One writer traces where the door led:
He entered the ark before the flood, and God shut him in. He was as safe as God could make him. Even so, no one could yet call him saved: he was still to be brought safely through the water. The water was God's judgment, and it overwhelmed the world. Noah goes through it. He enters the ark in the old world, goes through the water, the judgment, and comes out in the new world. He could not be saved except by going through.
- Warned — Noah went in for waters no one could yet see; God's word, believed, made the flood a present fact.
- Went — one step took both feet off the condemned ground; there was no standing half in.
- Whole house — the family entered on the faith of its head, and even the make-up of the eight shows God's care.
- Walled in — the hand that released the waters had already closed the door; safety was as secure as God Himself.
- Water-borne — the ark did not avoid the judgment but carried them through it, out into a new world.
Of clean beasts, and of beasts that are not clean, and of fowl, and of everything that creeps on the ground,
Here the ark's passengers are named in four groups, and the next verse says they went in two by two. Two questions follow. Why pairs, when verse 2 asked for seven of every clean kind? And why are animals called clean or unclean here, when no rule has yet been given to explain the difference?
No rule here tells Noah how to tell one class from the other. What he did after the flood shows what the sorting was for.
The first time we read of clean and unclean animals is when Noah went into the ark. God told him to take seven pairs of each of the clean beasts and clean birds, and only two of the unclean. We are told nothing about how Noah told them apart, but it shows that in early days there was a distinction between the clean and the unclean. Those called "clean" were surely clean for sacrifice, and not for food, since Scripture says nothing of man eating animal food until after the flood... When Noah came out of the ark, he offered some of every clean beast and every clean bird as burnt offerings.
Verse 2 asked for seven of each clean kind. The next verse says they went in two and two. Commentators see no clash here: the twos describe male and female pairing, while the clean came in greater numbers. Two names for God appear in what follows — Elohim and Jehovah.
In the accounts of Elohim's directions for saving the different kinds of creatures, the order is to take two of every sort, the male and the female, to keep them alive. Nothing could be simpler than the meaning of this. When Jehovah states His thoughts about Noah, and gives His directions about His relationship with man and the earth, He tells Noah to take the clean beasts by sevens — still two and two, male and female. And they all go in two and two, just as Elohim had commanded.
Commentators read the switch between the two names as deliberate. Where He acts as Creator, pairs are enough. Where He deals with Noah in relationship, He asks for more.
In relation to His place as Creator, God preserved two of every sort. In relation to His own moral government, He would have seven taken into the ark — seven animals of each clean sort. Of the unclean, just enough would be there to preserve what He had made. So in the one case we have what was generally necessary. In the other we have what was special, and due to the relationship in which man stood with Jehovah.
This verse belongs to a paragraph where God is named as God rather than by His covenant name, and the wording matches that.
Clean beasts are named as well as unclean, and birds, and reptiles, as all going in. Yet only two and two, male and female, are spoken of, "as God commanded Noah," because the point here is simply to keep each race alive, high or low.
Commentators differ on whether verse 2 means seven animals of each clean kind or seven pairs. Read as seven, the number leaves three pairs and one over — and that one had a purpose waiting on dry ground.
Why the odd one in the seven? Because they were to be offered in sacrifice as a burnt offering at the very start of the renewed earth. The Lord knew that the flood had made no change in human nature. Even in Noah and his family it was the same after the flood as before it... and so from the outset the new world could only continue on the basis of sacrifice.
Noah did not have to hunt these animals down. They came — and their coming preached to the people watching.
From east, west, north, and south, the hand of God gathered the animals that cannot speak. The people must have thought it strange when those beasts went in. They were wiser than men. They obeyed the call of God... These animals knew the call of their Creator, and they passed in safely, but man paid no attention. Oh, sinner, what a state you are in! Just think — the very creatures stand as a testimony against you. They all came to a place of safety. Have you?
The ark held more than one family. Its passenger list points beyond the rescue of people.
The beasts, clean and unclean, taken into the ark, along with the birds of the air, give us the hint that creation will share the blessed effects of salvation. Later prophetic words, and Romans 8:19-23, tell us of a coming deliverance for groaning creation.
- Commanded. Every passenger came in at God's word, not by instinct alone. That command covers the whole list, clean and unclean alike.
- Counted. Seven of each clean kind, two of the unclean, and all of them still male and female. Commentators see design here, not contradiction.
- Clean. Scripture first draws the clean and unclean line at the ark. It points forward to the altar, not back to an earlier rule.
- Consumed. The spare clean animal was for the burnt offering. Human nature came out of the flood unchanged, so the new world would rest on sacrifice.
- Carried. Beasts, birds and creeping things all rode out the judgment. That hints that creation itself will share in God's salvation.
there came two and two unto Noah into the ark, male and female, as God had commanded Noah.
The animals go into the ark in pairs, and the verse ties the whole scene to one fact: God had commanded it. That raises two questions — why "God" here and not "the LORD", and how the pairs fit with the sevens of clean animals Noah was told to take.
Genesis 7 uses two names for God within a few verses. Commentators read the change as deliberate. In the five verses before, the name is Jehovah — the personal name printed as "the LORD". From verse 6 the account uses "God", which is Elohim in Hebrew.
The general statement that follows in verses 6-10 confirms the special force of these five verses. There "God" appears rather than Jehovah, and so nothing about moral relationship in particular. And this is so true that the account names clean beasts as well as unclean, and birds, and reptiles, as going in too. Yet it speaks of only two and two, male and female, "as God commanded Noah," because the point is simply to keep each kind alive, high or low.
"Male and female" belongs to the same thought. It is about keeping the kinds going, not about how anyone stands with God. That is why the name "God" fits here.
Some read verse 9 as clashing with the earlier instruction about sevens of clean animals. Both are true at once: the sevens were themselves counted in pairs.
When Jehovah states His thoughts about Noah, and gives His directions about His relationship with man and the earth, He tells Noah to take clean beasts by sevens — still two and two, male and female. And they all go in two and two, as Elohim had commanded. So the text itself ties the two names together. The reason for treating the clean beasts differently — still two and two, male and female — is too obvious to raise the smallest difficulty.
The clean animals were counted differently, and not only so that they would survive.
Here God provides not merely for keeping the creature alive, but with marked completeness for sacrifice. So we see His perfect care to keep His own rights and place as the One who governed morally.
The verse does not say Noah rounded the animals up. It says they went in. One writer draws a warning out of that.
From east, west, north, and south, the hand of God gathered the animals. It must have looked strange to the people when those animals went in. They were wiser than men. They obeyed the call of God. Men would not obey then, and many still do not. These animals knew the call of the Creator, and they passed in safely, but man paid no attention. Oh, sinner, what a case yours is. Imagine — the very creatures being a testimony against you.
Every detail of the ark and its passengers came by instruction — the numbers, the kinds, the food. That is the point of the closing clause of the verse.
God also gave instructions about all that the ark was to hold: seven of the clean creatures and two of the rest, male and female, with enough food for all. Nothing was left to arrangement or imagination; God ordered it all from first to last. This is worth noting, for here we have the first illustration of salvation that the Bible gives us.
Commentators read the ark itself as a picture of Christ:
The ark had a window above — looking towards Heaven and not on the earth and its judgment beneath. It had one door and only one, in the side. All of this applies to Christ and salvation... He passed through death and judgment for us and has made Himself our perfect ark, our hiding place. In Him we are lifted above the judgment waters.
The ark held more than one family. The pairs of animals and birds point past their own survival.
The beasts, clean and unclean, taken into the ark, as well as the birds of the air, give us the hint that creation will share the blessed effects of salvation. The later prophetic word, and Romans 8:19-23, tell us of a coming deliverance of groaning creation.
- Commanded. Every number came from God's word, not Noah's planning: "nothing was left to arrangement or imagination."
- Gathered. Noah did not hunt the animals down; they came, obeying a call that the people around them ignored.
- Counted. Pairs and sevens do not conflict: the sevens were themselves male and female, the extras kept back for sacrifice.
- Preserved. The name "God" fits verse 9. Here the Creator keeps every kind alive through judgment.
- Restored. The animals saved with Noah hint that creation itself will share in God's deliverance.
And it came to pass after seven days that the waters of the flood were on the earth.
God had set a seven-day countdown, and this verse records that the week ran out just as He said. One short sentence raises two large questions: why did God wait, and what happened to the people who wasted the wait?
The 120 years of Genesis 6:3 had already run out before this last week began.
Noah preached all these years, and never got a convert, that I know of. Remember, a moment is coming when you will have heard the last word. So it was in Noah's day. In the end the one hundred and twenty promised years ran out. Then God gave a guilty world seven extra days of grace. He did not promise these seven days, but He gave them. How like God. If you want to be saved, you come to Jesus today. There is no promise of seven days of grace to you.
That week put the evidence in plain view.
Then a respite of seven days is given before the flood would come. This shows again the longsuffering of God. Men saw the large number of animals coming to the ark. They saw Noah's whole family go into this finished, gigantic vessel. At least by then they should have realized that the project was not just something Noah had dreamed up, even though rain had never fallen before. But God gave men another week to change their minds. Perhaps, as those few days passed, people grew more confident each day that nothing would happen, instead of growing worried as they should have.
Notice the order: the door closed first, and the water came after.
We see God's longsuffering here. He bore long with the sinners before the flood and gave them space for repentance. Every day that Noah worked at the ark, every plank, every nail, every stroke of his hammer, was a warning and a threat of the coming judgment. More than that, God could do nothing until Noah was safe in the ark, after He Himself had shut him in. Even then He waited seven more days. And if Noah had taken twice as long to be shut up safe in the ark, judgment would have waited just as long.
The door that shut Noah in also shut everyone else out.
Once God had shut the door, no one could open it again. When the rain began to fall, others might be terrified enough to rush for shelter, but they could not get in. Once the door closed, it was too late. How solemn a lesson for those who neglect the salvation of their souls until too late!
Two deadlines stand in the record here, one long and one short.
So we have clear examples of God's ways in prophecy. There is the short, clearly marked interval of "seven days" in Genesis 7:10, when the blow was to fall. It came after a long and generous warning of "a hundred and twenty years" in Genesis 6:3. Both stand plainly in the record. Each is worthy of Him who alone could announce both with authority and fulfil both on time. If He executes judgment on a world that hardens itself in wickedness and refuses to believe His word, He also makes room to show His mercy. He shows it to those who keep His word in faith and obey Him, as Noah did, and so saved his household.
The warning came first to one man. The flood reached everyone.
The man who enjoyed Jehovah's favour received the earlier word in grace. When the judgment came, no one could miss it.
Jesus pointed back to the days of Noah when He described His own coming.
The Lord next refers to the days of Noah. It will be the same in His own days, when He comes as the Son of Man… "They ate, they drank, they married, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, and the flood came and destroyed all of them." Men forget too easily that a far more sweeping judgment awaits the world, on the pattern of these two acts of God — the flood in Noah's day, and the fire that fell on Sodom in Lot's day. The Lord waits, to save souls. Such is His longsuffering and grace, but He "is not slack concerning His promise as some men count slackness."
- Warned — 120 years of building and preaching gave the world notice; every nail Noah drove was a warning.
- Extended — the 120 years ran out, and then God added seven days He had never promised.
- Wasted — the loading of the ark should have convinced them; instead each quiet day made them surer nothing would happen.
- Sealed — judgment waited until Noah was safe inside; the door that shut him in shut everyone else out.
- Kept — the short deadline landed as surely as the long one; Jesus points back to Noah's day when He speaks of His own coming.
In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on that same day all the fountains of the great deep were broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
Genesis 7:11 fixes the exact day the old world ended. It also names two sources for the water, one below the earth and one above, and both raise one question: was this weather, or was it God?
One writer takes the exact date itself as part of the message:
In verse 11 God gives the date when the flood began, in relation to Noah's age. He gives not only the general time, but the exact day: the 17th day of the second month, in Noah's 600th year. The many dates, names and places recorded in scripture invite anyone to check for himself how accurate the word of God is.
The verse describes a double assault. The deep beneath broke open, and the sky opened above it.
The term, "windows of heaven," is very expressive. It denotes an outpouring from God above; it may be in blessing, as Malachi 3:10 shows, but here it was in judgment... But also there was from beneath a breaking up of the established order. What exactly is signified, when we read of all the fountains of the great deep being broken up, it is impossible to say. The tremendous event had never happened before, and it will never happen again. For we read, "never again shall there be a flood to destroy the earth" (Genesis 9:11). So we must be content to know this much: there were immense convulsions inside the earth, which produced a mighty upsurge of earth's waters to meet the waters coming down from above.
The picture behind the word is not glass panes but sluice gates held shut and then thrown open.
At the flood the expression the "windows of heaven" is in the sense of the "floodgates," as the margin note says. Gen. 7:11.
The same image returns later in the Bible, but with the opposite content:
In Genesis 7:11 we read, "the windows of heaven were opened," a scene in which the wrath of heaven was poured out upon a world of violence and corruption. In Malachi 3:10 we read of God's desire and promise: to "open the windows of heaven for you and pour down for you a blessing until there is no more need." A flood of judgment, required by the holy character of God; but a flood of blessing, expressing the love of God's heart.
People have long argued whether the flood was just extreme weather. One writer answers a critic who suggested the water came from clouds and perhaps the sea:
Scripture uses language found nowhere else. It shows that this was an extraordinary outbreak of waters, unheard of except in this one case, and never known in any other way... Does not the narrative speak of some outburst of water known on no other occasion? But let us be more exact about the fact. The passage speaks neither of clouds nor sea... It never says the water drained back into the sea, but that "the waters receded from the earth continually." It also declares that the fountains of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was held back. That is, the narrator does present it as having its source and its arrest in the extraordinary intervention of God — call it "miracle" or what you please.
Note the two halves of that argument: God started it, and God stopped it. Neither end of the flood belongs to the normal running of nature.
God shut the door, and the waters broke out that same day. Scripture then says almost nothing about the scene itself:
And now the last day came. It was on the seventh day that Noah went in, and then God shut the door. Then the world saw what it had never seen before... And then what panic! To me it is a very striking thing that God has drawn a veil over what happened then. All Christ says is this, "and they were unaware until the flood came and swept them all away" (Matt. 24:39). They paid no attention. They did not care about their souls. Then the moment came, and judgment overwhelmed them. It is a solemn picture of the terrible judgment coming on a world without Christ.
- Dated. God records the year, month and day the flood began, inviting anyone to check the accuracy of His word for himself.
- Doubled. Judgment came from beneath and above at once: the deep torn open, the sky unsealed. It had never happened before, and God promises it will never happen again.
- Opened. "Windows of heaven" means floodgates. The same open heaven pours out judgment here and blessing in Malachi — one God behind both.
- Beyond nature. The unusual wording points past normal weather. God released the waters, and God later shut them off.
- Sudden. The waters broke out the very day the door closed. That is why the flood pictures a judgment that arrives while people are unaware.
And the pour of rain was on the earth forty days and forty nights.
The rain that began here was no accident of weather; God had fixed the day and said so long before. Two questions come out of this verse: why forty days, and why does Scripture measure the flood so exactly?
Genesis gives two timescales: a long warning and a short one. Commentators read both as proof that the God who spoke was the God who acted.
Here we have clear examples of God's ways in prophecy. First, a short, exactly marked gap of "seven days" in Genesis 7:10, when the blow was to fall. But that came after a long warning of "a hundred and twenty years" in Genesis 6:3, when God's judgment would end man's days for the world of that time. Both stand undeniable in the record. Each is worthy of Him who alone could speak with authority, and He fulfilled both exactly on time. If He carries out judgment on a world that hardens itself in evil and will not believe His word, He also provides mercy for those who keep His word in faith and obey Him, as Noah did, saving his household.
Scripture keeps coming back to this number, and always with the same sense.
"Rain fell upon the earth forty days and forty nights" (verse 12). Here for the first time in the Word we find the number forty. It is not the last time. Forty means endurance and testing. Moses was forty days on the mountain; his life was divided into three forties. Forty years Israel was in the wilderness. Elijah knew the forty days, and Ezekiel lay forty days on his right side, a typical action (Ezekiel 4). Jonah preached, "Yet forty days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown"; and Christ was forty days in the wilderness to be tested.
Genesis says the rain came through the windows of heaven. That picture is not always one of judgment.
The term "windows of heaven" is very expressive. It means an outpouring from God above. It may be in blessing, as Malachi 3:10 shows, but here it was in judgment. The devastating waters came down for forty days and forty nights.
Rain alone could never have done this. Genesis names two sources at once, and neither belongs to the ordinary running of the world.
This was no mere matter of the clouds or of the sea, as it usually is. The inspired writer speaks of sources that were completely different and had never been seen before. All the fountains of the great deep were broken up, and the windows of the heavens, as the phrase goes, were opened. Neither the one nor the other was according to the course of nature that God established before or since. This is exactly what makes a miracle clear and impressive. Everyone admits the regular working of the physical laws by which God orders the universe.
One writer works the problem from the other end. Could the sky even hold that much water?
It is claimed that the sky above us would be full to saturation point if it held enough water to cover the earth just thirty feet deep... But to add to the awesome flood, the rain fell for forty days and forty nights (v. 12).
In Genesis 2 a mist waters the ground, and no rain falls. Some commentators think that lasted until the flood. They offer it as a suggestion, not a fact.
Verse 6 shows that a mist rising from the earth kept the plants alive, without water coming down from above. There were waters "above the expanse" (Genesis 1:7), but as yet they had not fallen as showers on the earth. Not until Genesis 7:4 do we read of rain. Some think that the watering of the earth by mist and not rain continued until the time of the flood. It may have been so.
For everyone outside, the rising water meant death. For those inside, the higher it rose the higher they went.
The ark was borne up. And that which was judgment to the world was safety for Noah. As the waters rose, what rose? This ark. A happy and blessed thing for those in the ark.
That reversal is why commentators read the flood as a picture, not just a record:
Plainly, the ark is Christ. The flood it saves through is the judgment of the whole world, and that world perished in it. Those kept safe come through to a new world that rises out of the waters.
- Announced — 120 years of warning, then seven days, then rain: God said it before He did it, and did it on the day He said.
- Measured — forty days marks a full testing. It is the first of many: Moses, Israel, Elijah, Jonah, Ezekiel, and Christ in the wilderness.
- Doubled — water fell from the opened windows of heaven and burst up from the great deep. The sky alone never held enough.
- Miraculous — neither source ran by the course of nature God set. Ordinary weather cannot explain it.
- Lifting — the same water that drowned the world carried the ark upward. Commentators read the ark as Christ: the judgment that ends one world floats His people into a new one.
On the same day went Noah, and Shem and Ham and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah's wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, into the ark;
Genesis 7:13 stops the flood story to name every person who walked into the ark. It also fixes the day. Two things stand out: God timed the rescue to the day, and the rescued company was tiny.
The chapter dates the disaster to the year, month, and day, and this verse ties the entry to that same date. One writer weighs that care in the record against the size of what happened.
So tremendous an event is recorded with the utmost precision and solemnity. We are told of it to the year, month, and day, when the judgment was executed.
The same detail carries a second point. If they entered on the day the rain began, then the way in had stayed open right up to that morning.
Verse 13 makes it plain that Noah and his family entered the ark on the very day that the storm broke. Noah had been a preacher of righteousness... Still to the very last day the door of the ark stood open, and nothing would have stopped a repentant man from entering, if such a man had been found.
Nothing in the sky announced what was coming.
Luke 17:26-27 tells us that life in Noah's day went on in its usual routine — eating, drinking, and marrying — until the day Noah entered the ark. On the morning of that day the sun rose as it always did. No cloud, heavy with rain, cast its shadow upon the scene, and yet sudden destruction overtook the world of that day. The letter to the Hebrews tells us that Noah's faith was warned about things not yet seen. He believed God, against all the evidence of his senses, and resisted the reasoning of the men around him.
The verse lists three married sons and no grandchildren. One writer sees God's planning in that fact, and comfort in it for people under strain.
The three sons of Noah, all married men, did not carry one infant into the ark. Eight adult persons passed through the flood. What a touch this is, showing God's thoughtful arranging and planning tenderness! And occurring as it does in such an unexpected place, it may well come as a comfort to many who are tried in circumstances.
Seven people went in alongside Noah. God calls only one of them righteous, and one son's later history rules out treating the rest the same way.
The Lord commands Noah to enter the ark with his house on this ground: "for I have seen that you are righteous before me in this generation." Someone might object that all the members of the household were probably "righteous" before God too. The later history of one of them — Ham — forbids that thought. So the statement loses none of its force: God delivered the family of Noah from the judgment of the flood because of the faith of its head... God's grace reached wider still: the sons' wives were included in His merciful purposes too, making up the eight persons Peter speaks of, who "were brought safely through water."
The sons appear here in the same order as elsewhere — Shem, Ham, Japheth. Commentators point out that this is not the order they were born in.
Shem comes first in the usual formula of "Shem, Ham, and Japheth" not because he was born first, but because of the spiritual purpose that gave him that position... Japheth, as the eldest, had the honour of birth. Ham has his own recognition, for rising early to political place and natural power. But the honour Godward was reserved for Shem, though he is named last elsewhere.
Writers do not stop at the history here. They read the ark as a picture of Christ, and turn the flood into a question for the reader.
That ark, floating peacefully over the dark depth of waters, was a type of Christ, and of the believer in Him. The waves of judgment buried the old world and man with it. Only one object remained — the ark, the vessel of mercy and salvation, riding in safety and triumph over the waves... It all hinges upon this one question: "Am I in or out of Christ?"
- The day — God dated rescue and judgment to the same day, recorded to the year, month and day.
- The door — they entered on the day the rain began, so the way in stayed open to the last morning. A repentant man could still have walked through it.
- The disguise — that morning looked like any other. Noah acted on a warning about things he could not see, against everyone's reasoning.
- The dependents — three married sons, and not one infant aboard. That touch shows God's thoughtful, tender planning.
- The dividing line — God saw one man as righteous, and carried his whole house through. Writers read the ark as a picture of Christ, so the question narrows to one: in Him, or out of Him?
they, and every beast after its kind, and all the cattle after their kind, and every creeping thing that creeps on the earth after its kind, and all fowl after its kind -- every bird of every wing.
The verse stops the story to list who came aboard: beasts, livestock, creeping things and birds, each one "according to its kind." Why would a judgment aimed at human corruption carry the whole animal world through it?
One commentator starts with a plain question: what was the ark for? The answer settles who goes in, and how many.
He directs the ark to be made. For what end? The preservation of the creatures which needed the ark. So He orders that two of every kind be taken into the ark. It is simply God the Creator's way of keeping the creature alive, despite the judgment about to fall. It has nothing to do with moral relationships. So here we only hear of pairs which enter.
Earlier in the chapter, clean animals go in by sevens. Here the creatures enter two by two. Is that a contradiction? One writer answers by pointing to two names for God in the story: God the Creator, and Jehovah, the name that goes with His relationship to man.
In relation to His place as Creator, God preserved two of every sort. In relation to His own moral government, He would have seven taken into the ark — seven animals of each clean sort. Of the unclean, just enough would be there to preserve what He had made. So in the one case we have what was needed in general. In the other we have what was special, and it came from the relationship in which man stood with Jehovah. This shows at once that these wonderful communications are not merely earlier and later legends, put together by a much later editor who tried to make something complete by stringing together what did not really fit. On the contrary, it is the Spirit of God who gives us the various sides of the truth. Each one falls under the name and style of God that suits the matter in hand.
Noah did not have to hunt the animals down. They came. One writer pictures the week before the flood as a sermon the whole world could watch.
I think there was a seven days' sermon. From east, west, north, and south, the hand of God gathered the animals. The people must have thought it strange when those beasts went in. They were wiser than men. They obeyed the call of God. Men would not obey then, and many still will not. These creatures knew the call of the Creator, and they went in safely, but man paid no attention. Oh, sinner, what a state you are in! Think of it — the very creatures are a testimony against you. They all came to a place of safety. Have you?
The animals in this list are not extras in the story.
Some of every sort are carried with Noah from the place of death into the ark of salvation. There are the "eight souls," as Peter calls them. But with them go what is left of the beasts of the earth, small and great, winged birds and creeping things. All are housed and redeemed together with Noah.
Another writer reads the animal cargo as a hint of something far wider.
The beasts, clean and unclean, went into the ark, and so did the birds of the air. This gives us the hint that creation will share the blessed effects of salvation. The later prophetic word, and Romans 8:19-23, tell us of a coming deliverance of groaning creation.
Why does so much depend on one wooden boat? Commentators read the ark itself as a picture.
Clearly, the ark is Christ. The flood it saves through is the judgment of the whole world, which perished in it. Those who are preserved come through to a new world that rises out of the waters. There the sweet savour of accepted sacrifice secures a lasting blessing.
- Creator. The pairs of every kind are God guarding what He made. They kept each creature alive through the judgment.
- Clean. The clean animals by sevens answer to something else: God's moral dealings with man, beyond the bare survival of the species.
- Call. The creatures obeyed God's call and went in. The people watching ignored it — a week-long sermon wasted on them.
- Carried. Small and great, winged and creeping, they all came through the same waters with Noah. They were safe because of where they were.
- Creation. That cargo of beasts and birds hints at a wider rescue still to come. Groaning creation will share the effects of salvation.
And they went to Noah, into the ark, two and two of all flesh, in which was the breath of life.
Genesis 7 records the moment when the ark Noah had spent years building filled up. The animals went in "two and two." The verse raises two quiet questions. Who moved these animals to come? And why did God's rescue of one family also carry the animal world through the judgment?
The text does not say Noah rounded up the animals; it says they went in to him. One writer pictures how that gathering looked to the people watching:
From east, west, north, and south, the hand of God gathered the animals. The people must have thought it strange when those beasts went in. The animals were wiser than men. They obeyed the call of God. Men would not obey then, and many still do not. So God says, "The ox knows its owner, and the donkey its master's crib, but Israel does not know, my people do not understand" (Isa. 1:3). These creatures knew the call of the Creator, and they passed in safely, but man paid no attention.
One writer names what the animals left and what they entered:
Some of every sort are carried with Noah from the place of death into the ark of salvation. Peter speaks of the "eight souls." But with them go remnants of the beasts of the earth, small and great, winged birds and creeping things. All are housed and redeemed together with Noah.
Why did they enter two by two? One writer answers from God's purpose as Creator:
What does He do then? He directs the ark to be made. For what end? The preservation of the creatures which required the ark. So He orders that two of every kind go into the ark. It is easy to see why this fits. It is simply God the Creator's way of continuing each creature, despite the judgment about to fall. It has nothing to do with moral relationships.
The sevens, by contrast, are linked to a different purpose: "It is God providing not for the perpetuation of the creature merely, but with marked completeness for sacrifice."
The verse marks out the passengers by their breath. One writer notes how far that phrase reaches:
The words "in whose nostrils was the breath of life" included man and beast. All go together in that way of speaking. Then at the right time God takes Noah with his family, and all enter the ark, "and the LORD shut him in."
Everything with breath outside the ark died. Everything with breath inside it lived.
The animals are not filler in the story. Their presence points forward to a wider deliverance still to come:
The beasts, clean and unclean, taken into the ark, as well as the birds of the air, give us the hint that creation will share the blessed effects of salvation. The later prophetic word and Romans 8:19-23 tell us of a coming deliverance of groaning creation.
One thing marks every creature in this verse: it went in. Commentators see the ark as a picture of Christ. The dividing line is not nearness but entry:
All perished outside the ark: all must perish outside Christ. It did not matter how close a person was to the ark, he was either shut in or shut out. He might have helped to fell the trees or even build the ark, but once the door was shut he was shut out.
The same writer adds why the ark could save at all:
If the ark had not risen and floated above the waters, it would have been no use at all — if it had stayed under the waters, it would have been a huge coffin. Our blessed Jesus did sink down to the lowest depths; He died, the Just for the unjust. But He rose again for our justification, and so the ark floating in safety to Ararat is a true picture of the risen Christ.
- Called in. God's hand gathered the creatures from every direction. They obeyed a call that the people around Noah ignored.
- Carried in. Pairs of every kind moved from the place of death into the ark of salvation. They were housed and redeemed alongside the eight people.
- Kept in pairs. Two of every kind was the Creator's own provision for carrying each creature through the judgment.
- Creation in. Beasts and birds inside the ark hint at more. One day the whole groaning creation will share what salvation brings.
- Shut in. The ark stands for Christ. The only question is whether you are in or out. Helping to build it saved no one who stayed outside.
And they that came, came male and female of all flesh, as God had commanded him. And Jehovah shut him in.
Genesis 7 closes its account of the entry into the ark with one short sentence about a door. Everything before it was Noah's obedience. This last act belongs to God alone, and commentators read it as a picture of how God secures salvation.
The verse does not say Noah closed the door behind himself.
Nothing shows the believer's perfect security in Christ better than these words: "the LORD shut him in." Who could open what God had shut? None. The family of Noah were as safe as God could make them. No power — angelic, human, or demonic — could burst open the door of the ark and let the waters in. The very same hand that had opened the windows of heaven and broken up the fountains of the great deep shut that door.
The same writer looks at what that meant for Noah. The flood that destroyed everything else lifted him above it.
He knew that God had poured out "all" the judgment, and that those very waves had lifted him into a region of cloudless peace. He floated in peace on the very water that judged "all flesh." He was put beyond the reach of judgment; and put there, too, by God Himself.
The verse uses two names for God. One goes with the command about the animals, the other with the shutting of the door.
"Male and female of all flesh went in as God (Elohim) had commanded him. And the LORD (Jehovah) shut him in" (verse 16). In this verse we have Elohim and Jehovah used. God, as Creator, had commanded Noah. Jehovah had announced the judgment, and the ark being prepared represented the patient and merciful Jehovah. And now, as the hour of mercy was past, Jehovah shut the door. He who had given an open door shut it at last.
Some claim the two names prove that two writers' work was patched together here. One commentator shows why the names differ:
Elohim is "God" in His sovereign dealing, as in creation. Jehovah is "the LORD," in His unfolding of special relationship... Take one verse (Gen. 7:16) to burst the bubble: "as God had commanded him. And the LORD shut him in." Two writers! because the name "Elohim" expresses care for the male and female animals, while the special concern as "Jehovah" shows in shutting Noah in.
The picture goes further than a strong door.
"The LORD shut him in." The hand of the Lord gave its own strength and security to Noah's condition. It is not too bold to say that all within the door of the ark were as safe as the Lord Himself. The Lord returned, we may say, to His own heavens, to His throne which stands for ever. Noah remained on the earth, in the place and day of judgment. But Noah was as safe as the Lord.
The ark had a door and a window. Each served a different purpose.
Remember, the Lord's own hand shut Noah and his family in the ark (Gen. 7:16), which was made judgment-proof outside and inside (Gen. 6:14). God Himself secured the door. None could enter, and none could get out. "The LORD shut him in." God took charge of the door — safety — while Noah looked out of the window above — communion.
Eight people stepped off ground under judgment and onto the ark. What God did next settled the outcome for those inside and those outside.
The decisive step for each was when they planted one foot on the ark, and lifted the other off the earth that was under judgment. It was either both feet in, or both feet out... Once inside the ark, "the LORD shut him in." When the Lord shuts, no man can open — not even Noah himself, had he wished to do so. The shut door secured salvation for the eight souls, and ensured destruction for the world of the ungodly.
Outside, minds changed once the water started rising.
Those who refused to enter the ark through the preaching of Noah could not get in after the door was shut. They might seek, and seek with all their heart, begging and pleading, as they saw the waters rising on the earth, but it was too late.
- Command, then close. Noah obeyed as God the Creator directed. Then the LORD Himself shut the door.
- Closed by the same hand. The hand that broke up the deep and opened heaven's windows fastened the ark. No power could force it open.
- Safe as He is. Noah stayed in the place of judgment. He was as safe as the Lord on His throne, because the Lord's own strength held him.
- Door and window. God kept the door — that is safety. Noah had the window above — that is communion, his eyes turned upward.
- Shut in, shut out. The same act saved eight and settled the ruin of the rest. When mercy's open door is shut at last, no one can reopen it.
And the flood was forty days on the earth. And the waters increased, and bore up the ark; and it was lifted up above the earth.
The flood does two things at once. The same water that drowns a world lifts the ark off the ground. Writers find both a warning and a comfort in that.
The length of the rain is not a random detail. The same number turns up elsewhere in Scripture when God puts someone to the test.
"Forty" appears to be the number of trial, or of endurance put to the test. So it was with Moses, Israel, Elijah, Jonah, and Ezekiel (for Judah). So too with the beating the law allowed for a wrongdoer, which was not to go past a set limit. So here, and so in the Lord's temptation.
The same water that killed everything outside lifted the ark. Noah was not spared the flood; the flood carried him.
The ark was borne up. And that which was judgment to the world was safety for Noah. As the waters rose, what rose? This ark. A happy and blessed thing for those in the ark.
The same point reaches past Noah to Christ.
Notice that this testing of things, while it destroys everything else, lifts the ark up on the face of the waters. Judgment vindicates and exalts Christ and all who are connected with Him.
The lift was not only physical. God's salvation raises those it saves.
The flood waters brought destruction on the ungodly world. They also lifted the ark, so that "it rose high above the earth." This may remind us that the salvation of God has a lifting effect at all times. Today above all, we are called to set our mind "on things that are above, not on things that are on earth" (Colossians 3:2).
Being carried also meant being shut in. That changed what the passengers could see and do.
The passengers in that vessel, so wonderfully guided and protected, did not need their eyes for steering. They were not to look out on the solemn judgment taking effect around them. Meanwhile the waters, which were the grave of the world, floated them above the world's mountain tops up to the blue heavens, growing calmer as they rose. What a season for them — shut in by God, with God!
Writers are careful to say who the ark stands for, and who it does not.
The water was the instrument of God's judgment in destruction. Those in the ark were saved through it, but only because they submitted to God's word and were secured by the ark. But the ark was a picture of Christ, not of the church, as some wrongly imagine. No church existed then; and even if it had, it could not have saved.
Where the ark came to rest completes the picture. It did not settle back into the old world.
Those very waters of death destroyed all beneath them. Yet they carried safely on their surface this representative man, and those saved with him. We must only keep in mind that this is a figure of death and resurrection... Noah was taken from among the dead and placed on Ararat: Christ was taken from among the dead and has gone into heaven. All perished outside the ark: all must perish outside Christ.
The rising water was not weather. God was carrying out the word He had spoken.
It was for God now to carry out His word of judgment: whether or not He caused His wind to blow, the waters flowed. It was no question of His ordinary regulation according to the laws He impressed on creation. His word is final. Man must learn that He is, and that He punishes, even in this world where He sees fit, the wickedness that goes too far.
The same writer describes where all that water came from, and the size of what it lifted.
For forty days the flood poured out from beneath and from above, and it bore up the huge structure of the ark on the face of the waters. The waters rose so high that "all the high mountains under the whole heaven were covered."
- Tested — Forty days marks a full time of testing. The same number meets Moses, Israel, Elijah, Jonah and the Lord.
- Judged — The water rose because God was carrying out His word. His word is final, and He does punish in this world when He sees fit.
- Carried — The flood that judged the world kept Noah safe. What destroys everything else is what lifts the ark.
- Lifted — Salvation raises. The ark rose above the earth, and we are to set our minds on things above.
- Landed — The ark pictures Christ, not the church. Those inside came through the waters of death to new ground, as Christ came from among the dead and has gone into heaven.
And the waters prevailed and increased greatly on the earth; and the ark went on the face of the waters.
The waters climb, and the same rising flood that buries a world puts the ark afloat on its surface. Why does the same water destroy a world and lift one family to safety?
The very water that killed the world carried Noah. One writer asks whether that left him with any fear at all.
Did Noah have any anxiety about the billows of divine judgement? None whatever. How could he? He knew that "all" had been poured out, while he himself was raised, by those very outpoured billows, into a region of cloudless peace. He floated in peace on that very water by which "all flesh" was judged. He was put beyond the reach of judgement; and put there, too, by God Himself. God Himself had invited him in: "Go into the ark, you and all your household." Once he had taken his place there, we read, "And the LORD shut him in." Here was full and perfect security for all inside.
Commentators read the ark as a picture of Christ, and the flood as a picture of His death. That reading makes the floating ark a picture of every believer's place in Him.
The deluge which came, a flood of waters covering everything, so that the end of all flesh came, is a type of the death of Christ. In His death judgment was passed and carried out on all flesh. The waves and billows rolled over His innocent head. He passed through death and judgment for us and has made Himself our perfect ark, our hiding place. In Him we are lifted above the judgment waters.
One writer treats the flood as a test. A test does two opposite things at once, depending on what it tests.
Notice that this testing of things, while it destroys everything else, bears up the ark (Gen. 7:18) on its face. Judgment vindicates and exalts Christ and all who are connected with Him.
The rising water did more than rescue the ark. It raised it, and one writer draws a lesson from that height.
The flood waters, which brought destruction on the world of the ungodly, had the effect of lifting the ark high above the earth. This may serve to remind us that the salvation of God has an elevating effect at all times. Today above all, we are called to "set your minds on things that are above, not on things that are on earth" (Col. 3:2).
God guided the ark; no one on board had to. That settled where the people inside could look.
The door of the ark was in the side, but the window was above. It is nothing new to say that this is faith's outlook. The passengers in that wonderfully guided and protected vessel did not need their eyes for steering. They were not to look out on the solemn scenes of the judgment taking effect around them. Meanwhile the waters, which were the grave of the world, floated them above its mountain tops up to the blue heavens, growing calmer as they rose. What a time for them — shut in by God, with God! And what a preparation for beginning that new life which they were to start in the world beyond the flood!
Noah never spent the voyage checking his own vessel.
Noah did not suspect the ark. He did not busy himself feeling its timbers, to see whether they were keeping the water out. He had no doubt about that. He had no pump in his ship, if I may use the figure; and I may say it, since, plain as it is, it glorifies Jesus in the security He gives the sinner.
Floating was a passage, not a destination. It ended in a new world.
Noah, and those with him, escaped the judgment by passing through the waters of judgment. Christ has passed through death and is risen. The believer is clear of judgment, because he has passed through the judgment in the Person of his substitute. Noah came into a new world, free of judgment. In the same way, Christ is risen and beyond judgment. This frees the believer's conscience from all dread of the judgment he deserves. He sees that he is as clear of all his sins before God, and of their judgment, as Christ Himself.
- Same water. The flood that drowned the world held the ark up. Judgment and salvation came in one event. The difference was where you were.
- Lifted. As the waters rose, so did the ark. The testing that destroys everything else exalts Christ and everyone connected with Him.
- Above. Being lifted changes the line of sight. God's salvation raises those it saves, and calls them to set their minds on things above.
- Carried. No rudder, no pump. God carried those inside. Their peace rested on the vessel He designed, not on their own checking of it.
- Through. Floating was a passage, not the end. It led to a new world. Christ passed through death and rose beyond judgment, and the believer's conscience is clear.
And the waters prevailed exceedingly on the earth; and all the high mountains that are under all the heavens were covered.
Genesis 7:19 records the moment the water rose past every landmark on earth. It raises two questions commentators return to again and again: how far did the flood reach, and what was God doing in burying a whole world under water?
How much of the earth did the flood cover? One writer answers from the plain wording of the verse, and argues that a local flood is no easier to believe:
Language could hardly be clearer than Scripture is on this point. Words cannot be plainer than these in pointing to a worldwide flood. Scripture separates the world that then was from the earth that now is, and faith can easily accept God's statement. It was a miracle. Covering all the high hills in one district only, without the water flowing to other parts, would need just as great a miracle as covering the whole earth. God, the Creator of all things, could easily form the water needed to cover the whole earth, and afterwards disperse it into its elements.
Another writer ties how far the water reached to the purpose behind it, and to a judgment still to come:
I believe the flood was all over the earth, wherever man was... Suppose Mount Ararat, fifteen or sixteen thousand feet high, in northern Armenia, was covered. If the waters were not all around it, and far beyond it too, they would have run off and covered somewhere else. There had to be a miracle either way. To me the flood was completely universal, and Scripture plainly means it so, because the aim was to destroy the world that then was. God puts an end to the whole system of the world. This judgment of the earth and all that was on it was as complete as the coming judgment by fire will be. God says He will never do it again; the next time it will be by fire.
If only humanity was guilty, the death of every beast and bird can look excessive. One answer given is that man never stood alone; he stood at the head of everything:
Many have argued that man alone was the guilty creature, so destroying all mankind would have fully met the case. That might have been so if God had pleased. But He has taken pains to tell us that He destroyed all cattle, beasts, and creeping things too; and we must believe Him. Man was the head of creation, so everything was caught up in the consequences of his sin. There had to be a new start, pictured in the death and resurrection of Noah in the ark.
From outside, the rising water meant ruin. From inside the ark it meant something else:
What was judgment to the world was safety for Noah. As the waters rose, what rose? This ark. A happy and blessed thing for those in the ark. And who is safe now? Those who have believed Christ; those who have trusted Him in the simplicity of faith. I see those eight go into the ark, and by and by I see them come out on resurrection ground.
Inside the ark, no one steered and no one watched the judgment outside:
The passengers in that wonderfully guided and protected vessel did not need their eyes for steering. They were not to look out on the solemn judgment taking effect around them. Meanwhile the waters, which were the grave of the world, floated them above its mountain-tops up to the blue heavens, growing calmer as they rose. What a time for them — shut in by God, with God!
Genesis 7:19 does not stand by itself. Later parts of the Bible take the event as fact and build on it:
God never destroys without warning. So a hundred and twenty years' notice was given of the coming ruin... The flood reached everywhere: "all the high mountains under the whole heaven were covered" (Gen. 7:19). The ancient book of Job refers to this worldwide ruin twice (Job 12:15; Job 22:16). The Son of God confirmed it during His ministry, and so did the Spirit of God in the letters of Peter and to the Hebrews. It is sheer folly to doubt the fact.
- Explicit. The verse's own wording is the decisive evidence for a worldwide flood. A local flood in one district would need a miracle just as great.
- Purposeful. The reach of the water matches the aim behind it. God was ending the whole system of the world that then was, not correcting one region. The next judgment will come by fire.
- Inclusive. Every creature went down with man because man was the head of creation, so a new start had to come through Noah in the ark.
- Reversed. The same rising water that buried the hills lifted the ark. Judgment outside was safety inside.
- Confirmed. Job, Christ Himself, Peter and Hebrews all treat this event as history. Doubting it, in one writer's words, is sheer folly.
Fifteen cubits upward the waters prevailed; and the mountains were covered.
The verse measures the flood. The water stood fifteen cubits above mountain peaks it had already covered. Commentators use that one figure to answer two questions. How far did the judgment reach? And why was the ark, not the mountains, the safe place?
The account of the rising water is short and restrained. One writer draws attention to the way it is told:
Next we have the prevalence of the flood described in language that is both simple and impressive, yet entirely free from the realistic details of horror that modern writers enjoy. The effect was complete over everything that breathed on the dry land and over bird life.
Some readers keep the flood local and place it in the river valleys of the east. One writer answers them from the place where the ark came to rest:
It is useless for the writer of "the Genesis of the Earth" to move the disaster to the low lands of the Euphrates and the Tigris. There a flood of fifteen cubits would barely touch the earth as a whole, or the people living on it. This is to overlook or disbelieve "the mountains of Ararat" (Gen. 8:4), where the ark rested as the waters were going down. Its chief peak stands 17,000 feet above the sea, and that may give some idea of the appalling fact. The account reaches beyond Ararat: if even its highest peak lay far under the water, what about the rest of the earth?
Another writer answers from the wording of the account. A limited flood, he adds, would be no easier to explain than a worldwide one:
Scripture could hardly be more explicit on this point... The words could not be plainer: they mean a flood over the whole world. Scripture marks off the world that then was from the earth that now is, and faith finds it easy to accept God's statement. It was a miracle. Covering all the high hills of one district only, with no water flowing to other parts, would take just as great a miracle as flooding the whole earth. And God, the Creator of all things, could easily make the water needed to cover the whole earth, and scatter it back into its elements afterwards.
The verse describes water climbing above every high place. For the eight people inside the ark, that rise was their rescue:
The ark was borne up. And what was judgment to the world was safety for Noah. As the waters rose, what rose? This ark. A happy and blessed thing for those in the ark.
The same rising water also fulfilled something God had already said:
The flood waters brought destruction on the world of the ungodly. Those same waters lifted the ark up above the earth. This can remind us that God's salvation always has a lifting effect. When the waters rose higher and higher over the earth, no flesh was in sight, and nothing was left but death. God had said that the end of all flesh had come before Him, and now that word came true. Everyone was either under the waters of judgment or inside the ark. The ark rode between the waters surging up from beneath and pouring down from above.
The flood took the beasts and the birds as well, and readers have long objected to that. One writer traces it to man's place at the head of creation:
Many have argued that man alone was the guilty creature, so destroying all mankind would have been enough. God could have done it that way, if He had pleased. But He has taken care to tell us that all cattle, beasts, and creeping things died. We must believe Him. Man was the head of creation, and everything shared the consequences of his sin. So there had to be a new start, pictured by the death and resurrection of Noah in the ark.
When the water goes down, the ark's passengers step onto ground that has passed through death:
The flood swept away the ungodly and brought judgment and death on the world. The waters carried the ark up, and it rested at last on the cleansed earth. So it taught the lesson of life for God's people on the other side of judgment and death. The new earth came up out of the waters of death. Noah and his family had been saved through those waters. They set their feet on dry land as people risen from the dead.
Writers read the drowned world as a permanent notice about a judgment yet to come:
So divine judgment cleared the world before the flood of its many and open evils. That judgment stands as a witness and a warning of another judgment hanging over the inhabited earth. There were two witnesses then, first Enoch, then Noah. Both announced the judgment about to fall on the ungodly while they were still living here. So it will be in the day when the Son of man is revealed (Luke 17:30).
- Measure. Fifteen cubits over the peaks is not a small detail. The depth shows how complete the judgment was.
- Reach. Ararat and the plain wording of the account point to water over the whole world, not one river basin.
- Lift. The water that drowned the world outside carried the ark upward. The same flood meant death for one and safety for the other.
- Passage. Noah's family came out onto an earth that had been through the waters of death, as people risen from the dead.
- Warning. The buried world stands as notice of a judgment still ahead, announced by Enoch and Noah before it fell.
And all flesh that moved on the earth expired, fowl as well as cattle, and beasts, and all crawling things which crawl on the earth, and all mankind
The waters have risen above the mountains. Now Scripture reports the result: every kind of land life is gone — birds, livestock, wild animals, swarming creatures, and mankind. The verse raises the questions readers still bring to the flood. How far did the death reach? Why did animals die alongside guilty men? What does such a judgment say to us now?
Writers who take the wording at face value find no room for a local flood. One reference work meets the objection head on.
Was the flood universal? Scripture could hardly be clearer on this point… The words of Genesis could not be plainer: they mean a flood over the whole world. Scripture sets the world that then was apart from the earth that now is, and faith finds it easy to accept God's statement. It was a miracle. And it would take as great a miracle to cover all the high hills of one district only, without the water flowing to other parts, as to cover the whole earth. God, the Creator of all things, could easily form the water needed to cover the whole earth, and then disperse it into its elements again.
This was not weather that got out of hand. One writer stresses that the waters did what God had said they would do.
It was for God now to carry out His word of judgment: whether or not He caused His wind to blow, the waters flowed. This was not His usual running of the world by the laws He set in creation. His word is paramount. Man must learn that He is, and that He punishes, even in this world where He sees fit, the wrongdoing that goes too far. He is patient, but He gave this early lesson to the ungodly, which they can only forget or deny at their peril.
The verse lists creatures that never sinned. Commentators trace their ruin back to man, their head.
Yet animals, creeping things and birds are included in this awesome destruction, for man's sin has involved the rest of the earthly creation. People may say that when they sin it is only themselves they have damaged, but man's sin always affects others too, even unreasoning creatures.
That link also carries a promise. The loss recorded here is not the last word for birds and beasts.
It is childish and sinful to complain about the destruction of the lower creation. The fall of its head, man, had already subjected it to futility. And now that man's wickedness called aloud for divine judgment, the birds and beasts share his ruin on earth. Yet even in this the goodness and the wisdom of God secure the victory in due time. The creation fell with the first man. What joy to know from God's word that all its groaning waits for the triumph of the Second man, when the sons of God are revealed!
Everything in this verse died outside one wooden box floating on the same water. Writers read that contrast as a picture of Christ.
The ark is Christ. The flood it saves through is the judgment of the whole world, which perished in it. Those it preserves come through to a new world that rises out of the waters. There the sweet savour of accepted sacrifice secures a lasting blessing.
The same water did two opposite things at once, depending on where a person was standing.
The water lifted the ark. And what was judgment to the world was safety for Noah. As the waters rose, what rose? This ark. A happy and blessed thing for those in the ark.
God had warned the people who died here. Their deaths became evidence for the message they had dismissed. Writers say the pattern is not finished.
Those who did not believe God's warning became the witnesses of its truth. The flood came and swept them all away. The waters of Noah did go over the earth, as surely as they shall go over it no more. A still more terrible destruction awaits it, however long it may seem to linger. By His word He keeps the present heavens and earth in store. He has reserved them for fire, for a day of judgment and destruction of wicked men. The one is as certain as the other. But we, according to His promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells.
- All flesh. The wording leaves nothing out. Commentators read it as a worldwide flood, not a local one: Scripture sets the world that then was apart from the earth that now is.
- All by His word. The waters were not nature misbehaving. God was carrying out what He had said. Man must learn that He is, and that He punishes.
- All creation. Birds and beasts fell with man, their head. They will rise with the Second man, when the sons of God are revealed.
- All but the ark. The same rising water that drowned the world lifted Noah. Writers read the ark as a picture of Christ — the one refuge carried through judgment into a new world.
- All again. Those who ignored the warning became proof it was true. The next judgment is fire, not water. Believers look for new heavens and a new earth where righteousness dwells.
everything which had in its nostrils the breath of life, of all that was on the dry [land], died.
This verse closes the account of the flood's destruction with one picture: breath stopped in the nostrils. It raises three questions — why the nostrils, whether man and beast stand alike, and how far the water reached.
An older margin reads "spirit" in this verse. One writer, quoting an older translation, checks that reading against the same phrase elsewhere.
Those who deny the soul's survival quote Gen. 7:22 (margin) as proof that "spirit" belongs to beasts. That is a mistake. The same phrase turns up in 2 Sam. 22:16, translated there as "the blast of the breath," and again it points to the nostrils: "the blast of the breath of his nostrils." The Genesis passage means the action of the breath on the nostrils, so clearly seen in states of excitement and fear: "All in whose nostrils was the breathing of the breath of life... died."
The words gather man and beast into one group. Then the account turns to the family God kept safe.
"All in whose nostrils is the breath of life" included man and beast; language like this puts them all together. Then at the right time God takes Noah with his family, and all enter the ark, "and the LORD shut him in."
Yet man and beast are not on the same level. The difference lies in how man received his life.
"A living soul" means anything that lives by blood and breath. I say this because it says, "whereinsoever was the breath of life, died"; all animals were living souls. Man was one, and the animal was one. But there was an essential difference: God breathed into man's nostrils the breath of life, and so man became a living soul. That soul might be parted from his body, and the body return to the dust.
The verse names the dead as those "on the dry land." One writer points out what that leaves out.
The flood lasted a long time and in the end covered even the high mountains, so all human and animal life would die. Of course this did not affect the life in the seas.
Some try to shrink the flood to one region. One reference work weighs that idea against the plain words of Scripture.
No words could be plainer than Scripture's here: this was a worldwide flood. Scripture marks off the world that then was from the earth that now is, and faith finds it easy to accept God's statement. It was a miracle. To cover all the high hills of one district only, without the water flowing to other parts, would need as great a miracle as to cover the whole earth.
The water rose because God had spoken. One writer draws out the lesson He left in it.
It was for God now to carry out His word of judgment: whether or not He caused His wind to blow, the waters flowed. His word decides everything. Man must learn that He is, and that He punishes, even in this world where He sees fit, the wrongdoing that goes too far. He is patient, but He gave this early lesson to the ungodly, which they can only forget or deny at their peril.
The water that ended every breath outside also lifted the ark. One door decided which side of it a man stood on.
The terrible waters of judgment roared over the earth. But those same waters of death destroyed all beneath them. On their surface they carried this representative man in safety, and those saved with him... All perished outside the ark: all must perish outside Christ. He might have helped to fell the trees or even build the ark, but once the door was shut he was shut out.
The flood was not only an end. One writer reads it as a standing sign of a judgment still ahead, announced beforehand by two men.
So God's judgment cleared the world before the flood of its widespread and open evils. That judgment stands as a witness and a warning of another judgment that hangs over the earth we live in. There were two witnesses then, first Enoch, then Noah. Each had his own marks, and both agreed in announcing judgment about to fall on the ungodly while they were still living here. So it will be in the day when the Son of Man is revealed (Luke 17:30).
- Breath — the phrase points to breathing at the nostrils. The older margin's "spirit" proves nothing about a spirit in beasts.
- Breath shared — the words cover man and beast alike. Every creature that lived by blood and breath was a living soul.
- Breath given — man's difference lies in the giving. God breathed into his nostrils, and that soul may part from the body that returns to dust.
- Breath stopped — the judgment reached everything on dry land, though not life in the seas. The plain words will not shrink to one flooded district.
- Breath preserved — the same water that killed all outside carried the ark. Nearness saved no one, and the scene still warns of a judgment to come.
And every living being was destroyed that was on the ground, both man, and cattle, and creeping things, and fowl of the heavens; and they were destroyed from the earth. And Noah alone remained, and what was with him in the ark.
This verse draws a line across the whole earth: God ends every life on dry land, and one boat with all it carries comes through. How far did that judgment reach, and why did God keep back that one small household?
Some read the verse — man, animals, creeping things, birds — as a local disaster in one region. One writer replies that the words rule that out, and that a limited flood would need just as great a miracle:
No words could be plainer. They mean a flood over the whole world. The world that then was stands apart from the earth that now is, and faith finds it easy to accept God's statement. It was a miracle. It would take just as great a miracle to cover all the high hills in one district only, without the water flowing to other parts, as to cover the whole earth.
Why did the birds and beasts die with guilty man? One writer answers that creation had already fallen with man, and points to the day when it will share the triumph of the Second man:
It is childish and sinful to complain about the destruction of the lower creation. The fall of man, its head, had already put it under futility. And now that man's wickedness called aloud for divine judgment, the birds and beasts share his ruin on earth. Yet even in this the goodness and the wisdom of God secure the victory in due time. For if the creation fell with the first man, what joy to know from God's word that all its groaning waits for the triumph of the Second man, when the sons of God are revealed!
The order matters. God shut the family in the ark before He sent a single drop, and one writer draws two of God's ways out of that order:
It is interesting to see that, before the governmental act of judgement began, the chosen family and all with them were safely shut in the ark, the vessel of grace... God in grace saved Noah before God in government swept the earth with the broom of judgement. It is grace and government over again. Grace acts in salvation; government acts in judgement. We see God in both. Every atom of the ark bore the sweet mark of grace; every wave of the flood reflected the solemn decree of government.
The verse also records what was left. One writer looks at that small cargo and sees all that God could still bring out of it, long after the flood:
Who can measure the delight with which the blessed God viewed the contents of that ark? They held vast promise for His praise — the spiritual family of the Ethiopian official, of Cornelius and of Saul of Tarsus. They held the thousands of burnt offerings, valued as pointing on to the unswerving devotion of Christ to the will of His God. Blessed indeed is that which "remained" despite the breakdown.
The second half of the verse names people who came through the flood on someone else's account. When God called them into the ark, He named one reason: He had seen Noah righteous in that generation. One of Noah's sons later proved he was not righteous himself, so their rescue did not rest on their own standing:
So nothing can weaken the force of the statement: God delivered the family of Noah from the judgment of the flood because of the faith of their head. It was not salvation itself, but it was a picture of salvation... So the grace of God brought the whole household out from under the judgment and set them on the new earth, because of the faith of Noah.
The verse divides the human race by one thing only — location. There were no degrees of safety, and no credit for having been near:
All perished outside the ark: all must perish outside Christ. It did not matter how near a person was to the ark, he was either shut in or shut out. He might have helped to fell the trees or even build the ark, but once the door was shut he was shut out.
Scripture treats the flood as a pattern, not a closed file. Two men warned that generation before the water came:
So divine judgment purged the world before the flood of its many open evils. That judgment stands as a witness and a warning of another judgment, which hangs over the habitable earth. There were two witnesses then, first Enoch, then Noah... and both announced the judgment about to fall on the ungodly while they lived here below.
- Blotted out. The words of the verse describe a judgment over the whole earth, and faith takes God's statement as it stands.
- Shut in first. Grace finished its work before government began — the door closed before the waters rose.
- Only remained. What survived was not a leftover but a treasure: a family and a creation kept for God's praise.
- With him. Noah's household came through on the faith of their head, not on their own record — a picture of the salvation God gives.
- In or out. Nearness to the ark saved no one; only being inside did — and the same line runs through the judgment still to come.
And the waters prevailed on the earth a hundred and fifty days.
The chapter ends with a number: a hundred and fifty days at full flood. Everything living outside the ark was already dead, so this verse marks not the start of the judgment but its length.
The account gives dates, not impressions. One writer lays out the whole sequence — a beginning, a peak, and an end you can count on a calendar.
As to the flood itself, the account given (Genesis 7:11 — Genesis 8:14) is quite explicit, both as to its duration and its dimensions. The tremendous rain lasted for 40 days and 40 nights. The waters prevailed from the 17th day of the 2nd month to the 17th day of the 7th month, when the ark grounded on the mountains of Ararat. … On the 27th day of the 2nd month the earth was dry enough for the occupants of the ark to go out from it — one year and 10 days having passed from the start.
Does the count of 150 days include the forty days of rain? One writer says it does:
Clearly including the forty days of rain, the waters prevailed on the earth for 150 days (compare v. 11 and Genesis 8:4).
Some have tried to shrink the flood to a regional overflow of the Tigris and Euphrates plains. The place where the ark finally came to rest rules that out.
The writer of "Genesis of the Earth" tries in vain to move the disaster to the low lands of the Euphrates and the Tigris. There a flood of fifteen cubits would hardly touch the earth in general or those living on it. This overlooks or disbelieves "the mountains of Ararat" (Genesis 8:4), where the ark rested when the waters were going down. Its chief peak, 17,000 feet above the sea, may give some idea of the appalling fact.
Rain and rising seas look like weather. Here they are something else. God announced a sentence, then held it in force for five months.
It was for God now to carry out His word of judgment: whether or not He caused His wind to blow, the waters flowed. It was not a question of His ordinary regulation according to the laws He stamped on creation. His word is paramount. Man must learn that He is, and that He punishes, even in this world where He sees fit, the wrongdoing that goes too far. He is long-suffering, but He gave this early lesson to the ungodly, which they can only forget or deny at their peril.
The waters that "prevailed" did not press the ark down. They carried it.
And we read, "The flood continued forty days on the earth. The waters increased and bore up the ark, and it rose high above the earth" (Genesis 7:17). The ark was borne up. And that which was judgment to the world was safety for Noah. As the waters rose, what rose? This ark.
The flood also completed a word God had spoken before the rain began.
When "the waters prevailed so mightily on the earth," no flesh was visible, and nothing but death could be seen. God's word about "the end of all flesh" coming before Him came true. Now all were either covered in the waters of judgment, or in the ark. The ark rode between the waters surging from beneath and coming down from above.
A hundred and fifty days is a long time to float with nothing in sight.
The five months of floating on a shoreless sea would seem endless to Noah and his family. We can well imagine that they would feel that God had forgotten them. "But God remembered Noah and all the beasts and all the livestock that were with him in the ark." … Yet at the end of 150 days the ark only grounded in the mountains of Ararat: there was still no land visible.
One writer sees the rising waters, and the ark above them, as a picture of Christ's death and of our shelter in Him.
The flood of waters that came, covering all, so that the end of all flesh came, is a type of the death of Christ. In His death judgment was passed and carried out on all flesh. The waves and billows rolled over His innocent head. He passed through death and judgment for us and has made Himself our perfect ark, our hiding place. In Him we are lifted above the judgment waters.
Some deny the flood ever happened. One writer names why:
Peter says, you like to believe that there was no flood, and I will tell you why. Because if you admit the flood, you admit the judgment of God on wickedness. And if you admit that judgment once, then it is more than likely He will judge a second time.
- Dated — The flood comes with exact days and months. Rain for forty days, full height for a hundred and fifty, and out of the ark a year and ten days after the start.
- Deep — Ararat's peak stands 17,000 feet high. A flood that covered it was no local river overflow. Nothing but death was in sight.
- Deliberate — The waters were not weather running its course. They were God carrying out His word — an early lesson the ungodly can only forget or deny at their peril.
- Dividing — The same rising water drowned the world and lifted the ark. Judgment outside was safety inside.
- Depicting — The waters that covered everything picture the death of Christ. He went through judgment, so those in Him are lifted above it.
And God remembered Noah, and all the animals, and all the cattle that were with him in the ark; and God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters subsided.
This verse arrives at the darkest point of the story. The old world is gone. The ark has floated for months on a shoreless sea. Then God remembers Noah, and the account turns from judgment toward restoration.
Judgment had done its work. One writer draws attention to what God delights in.
"But God remembered Noah." The strange work of judgment is over. Now the saved family, and all who are with them, come into remembrance… The beams of the sun begin to act on a world that had passed through a baptism of judgment. Judgment is God's "strange work." He does not delight in it, though He is glorified by it. Blessed be His name, He is ever ready to leave the place of judgment and enter that of mercy, because He delights in mercy.
Noah was already safe inside the ark. The verse gives him more than that, measured against the ruin all around.
But they were more than safe. They were remembered… The scene of death and judgment lay all around our patriarch. It was one vast, deep, mighty ruin… But He who had already shut His remnant in now remembers them. In that remembrance there was life for the present, and a rich inheritance ahead.
Remembrance did not mean instant rescue. The waters fell slowly. Those inside had every reason to feel forgotten.
The five months of floating on a shoreless sea would seem endless to Noah and his family. We can well imagine that they felt God had forgotten them. "But God remembered Noah and all the beasts and all the livestock that were with him in the ark" — the wild beasts as well as the domesticated animals. But a flood covering even the mountains would need a long time to subside, even with the wind God sent to help… The sources the water came from were stopped, and the rain from heaven no longer fell. That in itself would be a welcome relief to the people in the ark… Yet at the end of 150 days the ark only grounded in the mountains of Ararat. There was still no land in sight.
The verse says God remembered, not the LORD. One writer treats that choice as deliberate.
The next chapter (Genesis 8) shows God's remembrance of Noah and every living thing. Here it would not have served His purpose to say, "Jehovah remembered every living thing." That is because not every living thing stood in moral relationship with God. Noah undoubtedly was; but it is not always, nor here, the aim to draw attention to what was special.
The change of title is not random. It tracks the change of subject, and it shifts again a few verses later.
This is the general care of Him who had created all. So every living thing and all the cattle are remembered along with Noah… This is simply God's usual way from chapters 7:17 to 8:19. From Genesis 8:20 we have special relationship, and the name Jehovah appears at once, with perfect fitness… The same writer was led to vary the name of God just as the change of subject required.
One writer points ahead. Noah is not the last person God remembers this way.
It will be so with another chosen remnant in coming days. A book of remembrance will be written before the same covenant God who was now keeping Noah in mind. It is for those who fear the Lord and think on His name (Malachi 3)… Just as now, because of this covenant-remembrance, the Lord causes a wind to pass over the earth, the waters go down, and the ark rests on the mountains of Ararat.
Noah went through the flood and came out into a new world. One writer reads that as a picture of salvation.
Next comes Noah's passage through the judgment of the old world into a new scene, accepted by God in the pleasing aroma of sacrifice. This is the type of where salvation puts us — "in Christ, a new creation: old things passed away, and all things become new."
- Remembered, not forgotten. God's long silence was not neglect. This verse marks the moment His remembrance starts to act.
- Remembrance moves. He is always ready to leave the place of judgment and enter that of mercy, because He delights in mercy.
- Remembrance reaches wide. The verse says God, not the LORD, because the Creator's care covers every living thing, not Noah alone.
- Remembrance works slowly. The wind blows and the waters fall. Months still pass before land appears. Delay is not indifference.
- Remembrance ends in a new world. That remembrance held life now and an inheritance ahead. God brings His people through judgment into a new scene.
And the fountains of the deep and the windows of heaven were closed, and the pour of rain from heaven was stopped.
This verse shuts off the flood at both ends: the deep below and the sky above. Genesis 7:11 had opened those same two sources. Who closed them again, and why does the account tell it so quietly, in the same breath as God remembering Noah?
The waters stop because God has finished. One writer reads that as God moving out of one work and into another.
The strange work of judgment is over. Now the saved family, and all who were with them, come into remembrance… The beams of the sun now begin to act on a world that had been baptised with a baptism of judgment. Judgment is God's "strange work." He does not delight in it, though He is glorified by it. Blessed be His name, He is ever ready to leave the place of judgment, and enter that of mercy, because He delights in mercy.
Nothing in the verse suggests water simply draining away by natural means. The text names no clouds and no sea. One writer weighs the words the account actually uses, both for where the water came from and for how it stopped.
But besides rain, it speaks of the fountains of the great deep being broken up, and the windows of heaven opened. It is never said that the water drained back into the sea. It says that "the waters returned from off the earth continually." And it declares that the fountains of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained. So the account does present the flood as having both its source and its stopping in the extraordinary intervention of God — call it "miracle" or what you please.
The two phrases are not poetry for heavy weather. They describe a supply of water God had held in reserve.
Here we see how God destroyed the early population of the earth. He used the vast store of water He had provided above and below to overwhelm man and beast — apart from those preserved in the ark with Noah by His command. The language of Gen. 7:11 points to this huge overflow: "all the fountains of the great deep burst forth," "and the windows (or the floodgates) of heaven were opened." On the other hand, the language of Gen. 8:2 marks the point when the subsiding set in.
Through this part of the account the title is "God," not "the LORD." One writer reads that as the Creator's care for everything He had made.
It is the general care of Him who had created all, and so God remembers every living thing and all the cattle along with Noah. We have not here specific relationship, where "Jehovah" (LORD) would be needed and in keeping. It was the same when the account described God's action in bringing on the flood; here it is His action in removing what He had inflicted, for His creatures that were preserved.
Shutting off the water is not the same as opening the door. Months of waiting still lay ahead. One writer pictures how that wait felt to the people inside.
The five months of floating on a shoreless sea would seem endless to Noah and his family. It is easy to imagine them feeling that God had forgotten them… But the sources the water came from were stopped. If a tidal wave had come from the seas, it stopped exerting its power, and of course the rain from heaven no longer fell. This itself would be a welcome relief to the people in the ark. Yet at the end of 150 days the ark only grounded in the mountains of Ararat: there was still no land visible.
The receding water is not only history. One writer sees Noah's whole passage through the flood as a picture of what salvation does.
Noah passed through the judgment of the old world into a new scene, accepted of God in the sweet savour of sacrifice. This is the type of where salvation puts us — "in Christ, a new creation: old things passed away, and all things become new."
- Remembered — the turn comes from God, not from the weather. He brings Noah, his family and every creature with him back into remembrance.
- Restrained — the flood began and ended by God's own act. The hand that opened the deep and the sky closed them again.
- Reserved — the water came from a store God had provided above and below. Its closing matches, phrase for phrase, the opening in Genesis 7:11.
- Regarded — the title "God" fits here. This is the Creator's general care, reaching to the cattle as well as to Noah.
- Renewed — relief came long before release. The passage through judgment into a new scene pictures where salvation puts the believer: in Christ, a new creation.
And the waters retired from the earth, continually retiring; and in the course of a hundred and fifty days the waters abated.
The flood story turns here. Water that had risen for months begins to fall, and a slow, dated count toward dry land starts while Noah's family waits inside the ark.
The water falls back because God remembered Noah and everyone with him. One writer sees the sinking flood as the end of a work God took no pleasure in.
The strange work of judgment is over. The saved family, and all who were with them, come into remembrance… The rays of the sun now begin to act on a world that had passed through a baptism of judgment. Judgment is God's "strange work." He does not delight in it, though He is glorified by it. Blessed be His name, He is always ready to leave the place of judgment and enter that of mercy, because He delights in mercy.
The verse ends with a number: 150 days. The record does not leave those months vague. It dates each stage of the flood, from the first rain to the day the ground was dry.
As to the flood itself, the account given (Genesis 7:11 — Genesis 8:14) is quite explicit, both as to its length and its size. The heavy rain lasted for 40 days and 40 nights. The waters prevailed from the 17th day of the 2nd month to the 17th day of the 7th month. Then the ark grounded on the mountains of Ararat. On the 1st day of the 10th month the tops of the mountains appeared. On the 1st day of the 1st month of a new year the waters had vanished from the face of the earth. On the 27th day of the 2nd month the earth was dry enough for those in the ark to go out. One year and 10 days had passed since it began.
How far had the water spread before it began to fall? One writer answers those who limit the flood to a river valley by pointing to where the ark came to rest.
The writer of the "Genesis of the Earth" tries in vain to move the disaster to the low lands of the Euphrates and the Tigris. There a flood of fifteen cubits would barely affect the earth in general or those living on it. This is to overlook or disbelieve "the mountains of Ararat" (Gen. 8:4), where the ark rested when the waters were going down. Its chief peak, being 17,000 feet above the sea, may give some idea of the appalling fact.
Inside the ark, the change was too slow to see. Five months passed with no land in sight.
The five months of floating on a shoreless sea would seem endless to Noah and his family. We can easily imagine them feeling that God had forgotten them. "But God remembered Noah and all the beasts and all the livestock that were with him in the ark" — the wild beasts as well as the domestic ones. But a flood covering even the mountains would need a long time to go down, even with the wind God sent to help. Still, the sources the water came from were stopped.
The earth itself went under the water. One writer names the pattern in its return: death, then resurrection.
The earth has been remembered, and is now taken up again, but through purifying judgments. Everything takes the sentence of death into itself. So it may stand as a new thing, in the strength and grace of Him who gives life to the dead. The earth itself was in the water, or under the water. The chosen remnant were saved from the hand of the avenger, as in the appointed city of refuge. And so everything appears again, as in resurrection.
What Noah saw from the ark encouraged him. Still, he would not move until God spoke.
His faith had been tried not a little, but the outlook was comforting even from the first… But though rightly exercised and comforted, he still waited for God's word before going out, just as he had gone in at His word. He will not rush ahead in the impatience of nature and its self-confidence. He depends on God and obeys His word. God gave the word in due time, as He always does to those who look up to Him.
- Remembered. The water turns back the moment God remembers Noah — judgment is God's strange work, and He is always ready to leave it for mercy.
- Measured. Every stage carries a date: 150 days to the grounding on Ararat, one year and ten days from start to dry ground.
- Global. The water had to recede from mountains, and a peak of 17,000 feet rules out a local river flood.
- Slow. Five months on a shoreless sea felt like being forgotten. The sources feeding the flood had already stopped, though nothing looked different yet.
- Raised. The earth takes the sentence of death and comes back new. Noah steps out on ground that appears again, as in resurrection — and only after God speaks.
And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on the mountains of Ararat.
The flood story turns here: after five months adrift over a world under judgment, the ark touches solid ground on a dated day. Commentators find far more in that date and that mountain than a shipping log — they see God giving rest, and a new world beginning.
The verse fixes the landing to a named day. That day matters once you line the calendar up with the Passover.
God's judgment had done its full work. Then we read that the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day (Gen. 8:4). This is no accident. The seventh month became the first at the time of the Exodus (Ex. 12:2). So the ark rested three days after the day set for the sacrifice of the Passover lamb — the very day of our Lord's resurrection. The Saviour's triumphant return from among the dead is the public proof that God's wrath about the sins of His people has spent itself, and that He has established rest and peace forever.
The Hebrew word for what the ark does here shares its root with the name of the man inside it.
Noah means, as we have seen, "rest" or "comfort." His father Lamech gave him that name in faith that God would give His comfort through him, and that hope was well founded. In Gen. 8:4, the ark rested, literally "Noahed," upon the mountains of Ararat. In the 21st verse of the same chapter, "the Lord smelled a sweet savour," literally "a savour of rest," or Noah. In each case the root is the same. It shows how truly God answered the faith seen in his name. He gave rest while the scene around lay in ruins, and He declared that the sacrifice was the basis of it.
The named landing place is hard evidence about how far the waters reached. It answers those who shrink the flood to a local river basin.
It is no use for the writer of the "Genesis of the Earth" to move the disaster to the low lands of the Euphrates and the Tigris. There a flood of fifteen cubits would barely affect the earth in general or those living on it. This is to overlook or disbelieve "the mountains of Ararat" (Gen. 8:4), where the ark rested when the waters were going down. Its chief peak stands 17,000 feet above the sea. That may give some idea of the appalling fact.
One reference work adds a caution: "Some object that the mountain is too high. But the ark may not have rested on its highest part" (Morrish Bible Dictionary).
Where the ark stops is where everything after it begins.
The new world did not begin until God had executed judgment on the old, and the starting place was Ararat. This is the great question, I repeat: when did the new creation begin, and where is the source of righteousness and life? The New Testament makes it clear to my soul that this was so, and could only be so, when God raised Christ from the dead. The Old Testament makes it just as clear that Noah's world began when God raised him from the dead above the waters of the flood. I do not doubt the sons of Noah were safe, resting in the word of God, before this. But they were saved when the ark rested on Ararat.
The name itself may carry meaning. Ararat is said to mean "high ground" and "holy ground," and one writer adds: "Nothing is so holy and so productive of holiness as the rest of the gospel" (F. W. Grant).
The ark settles, but the view from inside has not changed. Nothing dry is in sight for months more.
The five months of floating on a shoreless sea would seem endless to Noah and his family. You can well imagine that they would feel God had forgotten them… Yet at the end of 150 days the ark only grounded in the mountains of Ararat. There was still no land in sight (v. 4). Four and a half months later the tops of the mountains appeared (v. 5).
Yet the ground underneath is real, and one writer applies that solid footing to the reader.
Then the waters go down, and the ark rests on the mountains of Ararat (Gen. 8:4)… For forty days he has been on solid rock. It is divine security. I am not only in the place of safety, but I have the sense of security. How absolute and perfect is the salvation that God gives.
- Judgment spent — the ark rests only after the flood has finished its work; rest follows judgment, it never skips it.
- Rest named — the verb shares the root of Noah's name, which means "rest"; the sacrifice later in the chapter is "a savour of rest" too.
- Rest dated — on Israel's later calendar, the ark lands three days after the day set for the Passover lamb: resurrection day.
- Rest grounded — Ararat is real, high ground where a new world starts; commentators tie it to Christ risen from the dead.
- Rest before sight — the ark touches rock while water still hides the land; safety comes first, the view comes months later.
And the waters abated continually until the tenth month in the tenth [month], on the first of the month, the tops of the mountains were seen.
The flood has peaked and begun to fall. This verse marks the day the drowned world first came back into sight, and it raises two questions: why did God's rescue come so slowly, and what did Noah do while he waited?
The flood narrative is not vague. Every stage carries a month and a day, and this verse supplies one of them.
The account of the flood itself (Genesis 7:11 — Genesis 8:14) is very clear about both how long it lasted and how far it spread. The huge rain lasted for 40 days and 40 nights. The waters prevailed from the 17th day of the 2nd month to the 17th day of the 7th month. Then the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat. On the 1st day of the 10th month the tops of the mountains were seen. On the 1st day of the 1st month of a new year the waters had vanished from the face of the earth. On the 27th day of the 2nd month the earth was dry enough for those in the ark to leave it — one year and 10 days after it all began.
The ark stopped moving months before anyone on board could see land.
The five months of floating on a sea with no shore would seem endless to Noah and his family. It can well be imagined that they would feel God had forgotten them… But a flood that covered even the mountains would take a long time to go down, even with the wind God sent to help. Yet at the end of 150 days the ark only came to rest in the mountains of Ararat: there was still no land in sight (v. 4). Four and a half months later the tops of the mountains were seen (v. 5).
The wording of this verse has been used as an argument about how far the flood reached. Because mountain tops had to re-emerge, they must first have been under water — and mountains do not hold water on one side of the globe only.
I believe the flood was all over the earth, wherever man was. There is no mistake. Some have questioned whether it covered the whole globe, speaking in general terms, as if it only covered the part where people lived. But Scripture says, "the mountains were covered," and "the tops of the mountains were seen," and so on. That sounds like the whole earth. You have to allow for a miracle in any case… Suppose Mount Ararat, fifteen or sixteen thousand feet high, in northern Armenia, stood covered. If the waters had not stood all around it, and far beyond it, they would have run off and covered somewhere else. There had to be a miracle either way.
Commentators read the sequence — resting, then land appearing — as a picture. What the passengers saw was not the old world restored but a new one beginning to show itself.
The third section pictures the resurrection… It speaks of the ground of resurrection (the resurrection of Christ) on which faith now builds, beyond the reach of any flood. It is high ground and "holy ground," which is said to be the meaning of "Ararat"… The new beginning is in rest: the ark comes to rest on Ararat, and the new earth begins to be visible.
Another writer puts it as a clean break with the past.
The old world perished. The new world began where the ark rested, upon the mountains of Ararat. God did not save the old world by Noah; old things passed away and all became new. It is so in Christ, old things passed away, and all things became new; and all things of God.
Seeing the mountain tops was a signal to act, but not a signal to leave. Noah's next step came only after this sight.
Another step was now taken by Noah after the tops of the mountains were seen. God had given the warning needed to save life, but He also put Noah's dependence and patience to a long test.
The pressure now was to get out. One writer treats that pressure as the real test.
No doubt Noah became impatient to leave the ark once it had done its work… He worked for many years to build the ark, and now he is impatient to leave it, as soon as it has saved him. God has been vindicated, His truth witnessed to, Noah and his house saved; and now he wants to leave it before it is God's will. It is harder to stay in the place of blessing than it is to reach it.
- Seen — dated. This verse is one dated point in a record of a year and ten days. Rain fell 40 days, the waters stayed high 150, and mountain tops showed on day one of the tenth month.
- Seen — slowly. The ark had come to rest four and a half months earlier. Even with the wind God sent, water that deep took a long time to go down.
- Seen — everywhere. Tops can only reappear if water once stood over them. Commentators take this as a mark of a flood over the whole earth, not one region.
- Seen — new. What came into view was not the old world restored but a new one, pictured on resurrection ground. Old things passed away and all became new.
- Seen — not yet entered. The sight of land let Noah look, not leave. He had to wait, and staying in the place of blessing proved harder than reaching it.
And it came to pass at the end of forty days that Noah opened the window of the ark which he had made.
God shut Noah inside the ark. At the end of forty days Noah makes his first move — he opens the window he had made and sends out a bird. Two questions follow. Why the window and not the door? And why must a man kept safe by God wait at all?
Noah had two openings in front of him, and only one was his to touch. One writer weighs what that meant for a man waiting on God's timing.
The ark had a window in it. The door was in the keeping of the Lord, but the window was for Noah's use. He who had shut him in was the only one who could let him out — the times and the seasons were in His hand. The time of his journey, as a prisoner of hope, cannot be shortened. Even so, his hopes may be richly fed, and his spirit within him kept active. Noah may open the window, remove the covering, look out, and send out his messengers.
Where an opening sits decides what it shows. One writer weighs the ark's two openings and what they gave the family inside.
The door of the ark was in the side, but the window above. It is no new thing to say that this is faith's outlook. The passengers rode in a vessel that was wonderfully guided and protected. They did not need their eyes for steering, and they were not to look out on the solemn judgment taking effect around them. The waters were the grave of the world. They lifted the passengers above its mountain-tops up to the blue heavens, and the waters grew calmer as they rose. What a season for them — shut in by God, with God! And what a preparation for beginning that new life they were to start in the world beyond the flood.
Forty is not a random number. One writer shows what such a stretch of time is for, and notes which opening Noah actually used.
Scripture shows plainly that "forty" stands for a period of trial, whether of days or years. Both the Old and New Testaments give examples. So it seems to have been here. And temptation must be borne, not dodged. We have the assurance that God will not let us be tempted beyond what we are able. He also promises that with the trial He will make the way of escape, so that we may be able to endure. So here, after waiting the proper time, Noah opened, not the light or roof, but the window of the ark, and sent out the raven.
Noah sent out a raven first, then a dove. One writer reads their different behaviour as a picture of what the heart rests in.
The raven went out, back and forth, until the waters were dried up from the earth. The unclean bird escaped, and no doubt found a resting-place on some floating carcass. It never sought the ark again. Not so the dove. She found no place to set her foot, so she returned to him in the ark. Noah sent her out again, and in the evening she came back with a freshly plucked olive leaf in her mouth. She is a sweet picture of the renewed mind, which, in the middle of all that ruin, seeks and finds its rest and portion in Christ.
The raven stayed away, and Noah could have taken that as proof the earth was ready. He did not, and one writer praises his caution.
The raven never returns. The earth may still be uncleansed, but the unclean nature can put up with it. The "present evil world" will do well enough for fallen, degraded man… But Noah will not trust her. Beautiful, godly discernment! The raven may stay outside; but that is no proof to Noah that the earth is clean, or fit for the sole of his foot. Noah will not trust her, but sends out a clean creature after her.
- Door. God shut Noah in, and only God could let him out. The timing of release never belonged to the man inside.
- Window. The opening Noah could use sat above, so faith looked up into a clear heaven instead of out at the judgment — shut in by God, with God.
- Forty. The number marks a period of trial, and God asks us to bear trial, not dodge it.
- Birds. The raven settles in a scene of death. The dove finds no rest there and comes home.
- Discernment. Noah would not take the raven's absence as proof, and waited for a witness he could trust.
And he sent out the raven, which went forth going to and fro, until the waters were dried from the earth.
Forty days after the mountaintops appeared, Noah opens the ark's window and sends out a raven. The bird never comes back — so why send this one first, and what does its restless going "to and fro" tell us?
The forty days are not a random figure. Scripture uses that number in a settled way.
Scripture shows plainly that "forty," whether of days or years, marks a time of trial. Both the Old and New Testaments give instances. So it seems to have been here. And temptation must be borne, not evaded. We have the assurance that God will not let us be tempted beyond what we are able. He will also, with the trial, make the way of escape, so that we may be able to endure it. So here, after waiting the proper time, Noah opened the window of the ark — not the light or roof. He sent out the raven, which kept going to and fro till the waters were dried up from the earth.
The window itself marks the limit of what Noah could know.
The ark had a window in it. The door was in the keeping of the Lord, but the window was for Noah's use. He who had shut him in alone could let him out — the times and the seasons were in His hand. The time of his journey, as a prisoner of hope, cannot be shortened. Yet God may richly nourish the hopes of such a prisoner, and exercise his spirit within him for blessing.
The bird's behaviour follows from its diet. Its name and its food explain why it could survive where a dove could not.
The word oreb comes from a root meaning "to be black." It appears to cover not only the common raven but other birds of the same family, such as the crow and the rook. We read of "every raven after its kind" as being unclean (Leviticus 11:15; Deuteronomy 14:14). When Noah sent the raven out from the ark, it could no doubt find food, because it can feed on carrion. The dove could not. Yet the raven went "to and fro" till the waters were dried up (Genesis 8:7).
A world of death suited this bird.
The raven never returns. The earth may still be unpurged, but the unclean nature can put up with it. The "present evil world" will do well enough for fallen, degraded man. Indeed, to the unclean raven the ark was more a prison than a shelter.
The raven's absence proved nothing. It could stay out whether or not the earth was fit to live on. So Noah sends a bird he can trust.
But Noah will not trust her. What beautiful spiritual discernment! The raven may stay outside, but that is no proof to Noah that the earth is clean, or fit for the sole of his foot. Noah will not trust her, but sends out a clean creature after her. And the news that clean bird brings is very different indeed. It is, in principle, the contest of Caleb and Joshua with the other spies.
(Caleb and Joshua were the spies who brought back a true report of the promised land. Their companions did not.)
Commentators read the two birds as a picture of two natures in the believer.
As a type, this shows how little these Genesis life-stories forget or hide about what we really are, however sure we may be of our place in Christ Jesus. Saved out of the world, and no longer of it, we still carry the raven with us and may let it out. We have that in us which can settle down in a scene of death where the waters of judgment have not yet dried. Like the unclean bird, it uses the ark only as a base for pursuing the work it enjoys with more energy.
The contrast is more than natural history. It ends in a promise of victory.
The raven soon found something to satisfy its taste and did not come back. The dove found nothing till dry land began to appear. The flesh in us is like the raven, and feeds on carrion. What is born of God is like the dove, feeding only on what is pure. The dove, we may remember, is in Scripture an emblem of the Spirit of God. Now just as the dove got the victory over the carrion, so whatever is born of God gets the victory over the world. It must do so; it is in its very nature to do so.
- Window, not door. God alone opened the ark; the window was Noah's, so his knowledge was partial and his waiting was real.
- Forty. The number marks a period of trial — borne, not dodged, with God providing the way to endure it.
- Raven. An unclean bird named from a root meaning "black"; carrion kept it alive outside, so it never needed the ark again.
- Report. Its staying away proved nothing about the earth, and Noah refused to trust it — he sent a clean bird after it.
- Two natures. The raven pictures what still lives in a saved man and settles into a world under judgment. The dove pictures what is born of God — and that nature wins.
And he sent out the dove from him, to see if the waters had become low on the ground.
The flood is going down, but Noah cannot see the ground. He is shut inside the ark with only a window above him. So he sends out a bird to bring back word of a world he cannot look at himself. Two questions follow: why a dove, and why does she come back empty?
Noah's problem was that the ark gave him almost no view of the outside. One writer traces his action to the ark's own design.
God remembered Noah and all that were alive with him in the ark. He stopped the waters and sent the wind, which started the process of drying up the waters. The window of the ark was in the roof and not in the side of it. So Noah must have had an imperfect knowledge of what was happening outside. That is why he acted as Genesis 8:6-12 records. A raven and a dove are birds of a different nature as to habits and food. The one feeding on carrion and other unclean things, the other a clean feeder. When first released there was plenty to attract the raven, but as yet nothing for the dove.
The raven had already gone out and stayed out. That silence proved nothing, and Noah knew it — so he chose a different messenger.
The raven never returns. The earth may still be unpurged, but the unclean nature can take up with it. The "present evil world" will do well enough for fallen, degraded man. In fact, the ark was more a place of captivity than of safety to the unclean raven. But Noah will not trust her. Beautiful spiritual insight! The raven may stay outside; but that is no proof to Noah that the earth is clean, or fit for the sole of his foot. Noah will not trust her, but sends out a clean creature after her.
Noah did not rush the process. The forty days before the window opened are read as a measured period, and the pattern is applied to the reader.
We may easily gather from Scripture that "forty" is used again and again, of days or years, for a period of trial. Both the Old and New Testaments give instances. So it seems to have been here... He also sent out the dove. In this case it is added, to see if the waters had subsided from the face of the ground... The dove returned to Noah and to the ark, because water still covered the whole earth. This was conclusive. They must still wait.
The dove comes back with nothing, and that empty return is itself the report. Commentators read the ark as a picture of Christ. They read the dove as a picture of the Spirit of God.
The flood speaks of the judgment coming on all men for their sins. The ark speaks of Christ, the only shelter from that judgment. But His people, while they are still waiting in hope, can know nothing of what is theirs in Christ risen. So the Spirit — the dove — is given to make us know what is ours... On his first flight he finds nothing but a scene of desolation. Unlike the raven, who will feed on the refuse of what has been judged, he returns to the ark. The Spirit of God can find nothing in a world under judgment to rest upon, and returns, as it were, to Christ. It is as though He said to us, You will find nothing in all this world for your heart to rest upon; Christ is all.
The failed first flight has a counterpart in the Gospels, where a dove descends and stays.
Noah then sent out a dove. There was nothing to attract it. "The dove found no rest for the sole of her foot." This shows the condition of the world before Christ came. When He was here, the holy dove could remain on Him (John 1:32). But before that, there was no man on whom the Holy Spirit could rest. He came on certain men and gave them power for service. But there were none on whom He could rest.
One writer turns the picture into a question about where the reader stands.
If you have never had this rest, you are like Noah's dove. You are outside the ark, in a scene of judgment, without a spot for the sole of your foot to rest on. Safety, rest, peace and plenty were inside the ark; destruction, death, restlessness, and sorrow outside.
- Sent — Noah's window faced the sky, so he could not see the ground; the dove goes out as his eyes.
- Sifted — the raven stayed away, and that proved nothing; Noah trusted only a clean bird's report.
- Silent — the dove brings back no sign, and the empty return is the message: the earth is still under judgment.
- Sheltered — with nothing to perch on, she turns back to the ark, as the Spirit turns the heart back to Christ.
- Settled — the holy dove came down and rested on Jesus; outside that ark no one has a place to stand.
But the dove found no resting-place for the sole of her foot, and returned to him into the ark; for the waters were on the whole earth; and he put forth his hand, and took her, and brought her to him into the ark.
Noah sends the dove out after the raven, and she comes straight back, because water still covers the ground. Writers read it on two levels: a man testing whether the flood was over, and a picture of what a clean nature can rest on in a ruined world.
Noah did not rush. One writer sees the number forty as a set period of testing, and notes that each bird acted true to its own nature.
Forty is regularly used in Scripture, of days or years, for a period of testing... And we must endure temptation, not dodge it. So here, after waiting the right length of time, Noah opened the window of the ark and sent out the raven... The raven and the dove were each true to their habits. The dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and came back to Noah and to the ark... This settled it. They still had to wait.
The raven never came back; the dove could not stay away. One writer reads the two birds as two natures, and notes that Noah drew no conclusion at all from the raven staying out.
The raven never returns. The earth may not be cleansed yet, but the unclean nature can put up with it. The "present evil world" will do well enough for fallen, degraded man. In fact, to the unclean raven the ark was more a prison than a safe place; once she had escaped it, she never went back. But Noah will not trust her. What beautiful, holy discernment! The raven may stay outside; but that is no proof to Noah that the earth is clean, or fit for the sole of his foot. Noah will not trust her, but sends out a clean creature after her. And the news she brings is very different indeed. Noah knows he can trust her, and well he may: her only sympathy is with the signs of peace and of a new creation.
The verse gives the plain reason: water still covered the ground. (Older translations put the phrase as "no rest for the sole of her foot", which is how the writers quoted here word it.) One writer looks for the deeper reason. The dove came home because the ground was unclean, not because she was afraid or disappointed.
"Arise, depart; for this is not your rest," says the Spirit through the Prophet. And why? Why is it not to be our rest? "It is polluted," he adds. He does not say it is sorrowful, it is disappointing, it is unsatisfying, but it is polluted... The dove outside the ark was not afraid of a trapper's net. She found no rest for the sole of her foot on ground that was still unclean.
One writer takes the dove as a picture of the Spirit of God, sent out to bring news back to those still shut inside the ark.
The flood speaks of the judgment coming on all men for their sins; the ark, of Christ the only shelter from the judgment... His people, still shut in and waiting in hope, can know nothing of what is theirs in the risen Christ. So the Spirit is given — the dove — to make us know what is ours. The dove is sent out three times to make known the state of what was not visible. On his first flight he finds nothing but a scene of desolation. The raven will feed on the leftovers of what has been judged; the dove will not. He returns to the ark. The Spirit of God can find nothing in a world under judgment to rest on, and returns, as it were, to Christ. It is as though He said to us, You will find nothing in all this world for your heart to rest on; Christ is all.
One writer links the bird that had nowhere to land with the moment the Spirit came down on Jesus and stayed there.
In this scene the Holy Spirit is like the dove sent out from the ark. At last it has a spot where it can find a place to rest — to stay. The dove, you remember, went out more than once and came back each time, because she "found no rest for the sole of her foot". At last she found a resting-place and "returned not again any more" (Gen. 8:9, 12). The heavenly Dove, after 4,000 years of searching in vain for a sinless resting-place in man, has found One to rest on in the first chapter of John.
One writer puts the dove's plight to any reader who has never found that rest.
If you have never had it, you are, like Noah's dove, out of the ark, in a scene of judgment, without a spot for the sole of your foot to rest on. Safety, rest, peace and plenty were inside the ark; destruction, death, restlessness, and sorrow outside.
- No rest. The waters still covered everything, so the dove had nowhere to land.
- Polluted. The ground was not merely sad or disappointing. It was unclean, so no clean creature could settle there.
- Two natures. The raven stayed out among the leftovers of judgment; the dove came back. Noah trusted the clean bird's report, not the unclean one's silence.
- The hand that reached out. Noah drew her back in himself; the shelter she had left was still open to her.
- Rest at last. The heavenly Dove found no resting-place in man until He came down on Jesus and stayed. Rest is still inside the ark, never outside.
And he waited yet other seven days, and again he sent forth the dove out of the ark.
Noah has already tested the earth twice. A raven never came back. A dove found nowhere to land. Now, instead of acting, he counts out another full week. This verse is about waiting. Why would a man with the mountaintops in sight sit still for seven more days?
God used the whole delay — from the open window to the open door — to train Noah, not just to inform him.
Noah now took another step, after the tops of the mountains appeared. God had given the warning needed to save life, but He exercised Noah's dependence and patience to the full.
This waiting was not idle. Noah kept testing, again and again.
But it is beautiful to notice how Noah can wait. Many days had passed before he opened the window of the ark. Many more passed while he tested the state of the renewed earth by the messengers he sent out again and again — and not in vain.
The pull in the other direction was strong. The ark had done its work, and Noah wanted out. One writer reads the two birds as a rebuke to that impulse.
Noah had been a witness for God's mind, against the wilfulness of everyone around him. He worked for many years to prepare the ark. Now, as soon as it has given him salvation, he is impatient to leave it… The freed raven, going back and forth, is a fitting picture of the restlessness of our impatient spirits. The dove reads Noah a different lesson… The dove tells him first that he must have patience. How humbling to be rebuked by the weak, gentle tones of trusting love! The dove had a home in the ark — why should Noah not have one? The second time, the dove returns with the branch of peace. So not only must he submit; patience has done its perfect work, and he wants nothing.
The raven's absence proved nothing to Noah. An unclean bird can be content in a ruined world. So he put the question to a creature he could trust.
The raven never returns. The earth may still be uncleansed, but the unclean nature can put up with it… But Noah will not trust her. What beautiful discernment! The raven may stay outside; but that is no proof to Noah that the earth is clean, or fit for the sole of his foot. He sends out a clean creature after her… The dove returns by instinct. There was no rest for her in a place still under God's judgment and not yet cleansed. Noah knows he can trust her, and can leave the question to her to settle, so he sends her out a second and a third time.
The two birds behaved exactly as their natures required, and that is the point of the contrast — one settled among the ruins, the other could not.
There is surely nothing far-fetched in noticing how the unclean nature finds its satisfaction outside, where death reigns; while the clean returns to the shelter of the ark — first with no sign of life, then after seven days more with a freshly plucked olive leaf in her beak.
Commentators read the returning dove as a picture of the renewed mind. Such a heart cannot settle in a scene under judgment.
A sweet emblem of the renewed mind. In the middle of the surrounding desolation, it seeks and finds its rest and portion in Christ. And not only that: it also takes hold of the down payment of the inheritance, and gives the blessed proof that judgment has passed away and a renewed earth is coming fully into view. The carnal mind, by contrast, can rest in anything and everything except Christ.
Other writers see the dove as a picture of the Holy Spirit, who makes known what Noah could not yet see.
The dove is sent out three times to make known the state of what was not visible. On his first flight he finds nothing but a scene of desolation. The raven will feed on the refuse of what God has judged; the dove, in contrast, returns to the ark. The Spirit of God can find nothing in a world under judgment to rest on, and returns, as it were, to Christ.
On that reading, the seven-day pause is not empty time. It is the gap before the same messenger goes out again and comes back with something from the new world.
Next, the dove brings back something from the new earth — an olive leaf, a pledge of fruitfulness after the judgment. So the Spirit is for us the down payment of our inheritance — the foretaste and the pledge of what is to come. The olive leaf itself suggests the fruits of the Spirit — the olive produces oil — and these belong to the new creation.
- Wait. God had already saved Noah. The seven extra days exercised his dependence and patience. Waiting well is a beauty in him, not a delay.
- Test. The raven's silence proved nothing. So Noah sent out a clean creature whose report he could rely on.
- Return. The dove came back because a world under judgment offered her nothing. That is the mark of a renewed mind: it rests in Christ and nowhere else.
- Receive. The second time, she brings back an olive leaf — a pledge of fruitfulness after judgment, a first instalment of the world to come.
- Beware. The restless raven pictures our impatient spirits. The gentle dove rebukes them by coming home.
And the dove came to him at eventide; and behold, in her beak was an olive-leaf plucked off; and Noah knew that the waters had become low on the earth.
Noah has been shut in the ark for months, and the flood is his only horizon. Then the dove comes back with one small leaf — his first news from the world outside, and a picture, many writers say, of much more.
Noah could not see the ground. He had to learn its condition from a creature that could:
The dove was a clean bird. Noah sent it out the first time, and it came back, because it found no place to set its foot. But when he sent it out the second time, it returned with proof of dry land... There is much more to learn from this event. For now we will stop here and stress one point: the olive leaf was a sure witness to Noah that the flood had gone down.
The word "plucked" matters. The leaf was not floating wreckage. Something alive had grown it.
In the New Testament the dove becomes the picture of the Spirit of God... The second time, the dove came back with "a freshly plucked olive leaf." Here was the first evidence of life appearing above the waters of death. This leaf had not been drifting among the wreckage; it came from a living tree. Death entered by sin, and "so death spread to all men" (Rom. 5:12), as much after the flood as before it. The first evidence of real life rising up beyond the scene of death was when Christ rose from the dead.
Two birds went out from the ark. Each found a different resting place.
The unclean bird made its escape, and found, no doubt, a resting place on some floating carcass. It never went back to the ark. Not so the dove... "in her mouth was a freshly plucked olive leaf." A sweet picture of the renewed mind. Surrounded by desolation, that mind seeks and finds its rest and its portion in Christ. More than that, it takes hold of the pledge of the inheritance. And it gives blessed proof that judgment has passed away and that a renewed earth is coming into full view. The mind ruled by the flesh, on the other hand, can rest in anything and everything except Christ.
Noah's own conduct is part of the lesson. He did not accept the raven's silence as an answer:
The raven may remain outside; but that is no proof to Noah that the earth is clean, or fit for the sole of his foot. Noah will not trust her, but sends out a clean creature after her. And the news she brings is different indeed... Her only sympathy is with the pledges of peace and of a new creation.
Of all the trees that might have supplied it, the message came from an olive — the tree that yields oil.
A leaf stands for profession or testimony ("So Noah knew," Gen. 8:11)... The leaves hold the mouths and lungs of the plant. They surround it like so many tongues, telling what tree it is and what fruit is (or should be) on it... Here the testimony given is of righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit... The tree is a remarkable one, and its main feature is the oil (Judges 9:9). That is, what marks out the vessel of testimony is that it holds the Holy Spirit as the source of light... It is evergreen, and it will grow in the most barren and stony soil.
Everything depends on where that leaf came from.
One thing that had been under the waters of judgment had risen above them. One spot was clear of the judgment, and from that spot the dove brought an olive leaf to Noah. There is today one spot that has emerged from under the judgment of God: it is Christ... "So Noah knew." Through the testimony that the Holy Spirit gives to the risen Christ, we too may know that Christ has borne our judgment and put our sins away forever.
The leaf was small. It did not carry Noah out of the ark; it told him the day was coming.
Next, the dove brings back something from the new earth — an olive leaf, pledge of fruitfulness after the judgment. So the Spirit is for us the guarantee of our inheritance — the foretaste and the pledge of what is to come.
- Judgment. The first flight found nothing. The water still covered everything, and the dove had nowhere to set her foot.
- Life. The leaf came from a living tree — the first sign of life rising above the water of death.
- Witness. A leaf is testimony; an olive leaf, from the tree of oil, carries the message back to the man shut inside.
- Knowledge. "So Noah knew" — he learned the state of an unseen world from what the bird brought him.
- Pledge. One leaf is not the harvest. It is the sample that guarantees the whole new world is coming.
And he waited yet other seven days, and sent forth the dove; but she returned no more to him.
Noah sends the dove out a third time, and this time she never comes back. Her silence told him the earth was ready — and writers have long seen in this small event a picture of the Spirit of God finding a home.
The first flight ended in return, the second in a plucked olive leaf, and the third in silence. Writers point out that this silence carried the clearest message of the three.
The result after another seven days is plainer still, if that is possible. This time the dove was sent out, and she could find rest for the sole of her foot on the renewed earth. She did not return to him again. The dove had strong wings to fly from anything out of keeping with her pure and gentle nature. Now she had a place that drew her, and Noah could only draw the right conclusion.
Noah waited a further week before he tested the earth again. That patience did not come easily to him.
Noah, no doubt, became impatient to leave the ark after it had done its work. Nothing exposes our impatience or self-will as much as this… It is harder to stay in the place of blessing than to reach it… The freed raven, going back and forth, is a fitting picture of our restless, impatient spirits. The dove reads Noah a different lesson… The dove tells him first that he must have patience. The dove had a home in the ark; why should not Noah?… And when the dove goes out again, she may stay away. The discipline is over, and he is called into a new scene.
One writer takes the dove as a picture of the Spirit of God and reads the three flights as three stages.
Noah sent out the dove, emblem of the Holy Spirit of God, three times. The first time it returned with nothing. There was nowhere to rest her foot, for the waters were everywhere. This shows the utter ruin of the first man and of the old creation bound up with him. Death covered them all. The second time she returned with the single olive leaf. At last the first piece of the renewed earth had appeared above the waters… The third time the dove found not just a leaf, but a resting place for her feet.
The dove would not settle on a scene still under water. That is why, one commentator argues, the Spirit's coming had to wait for a finished work.
On the first flight the dove has nowhere to rest, so she returns. The Holy Spirit can only rest where the work of judgment is complete… The dove returns to Noah, but afterwards goes out from him and returns no more. This, I think, is how we should understand John 7:39. In Old Testament times the Holy Spirit visited the earth many times. But He could not yet be given until the ascension of Christ bore witness that the work of atonement was perfect. He is then given as a witness that peace has been made with God.
The dove that never came back has an echo in the New Testament. Another writer sees it in the opening chapter of John's Gospel, where the Spirit at last has someone to rest on.
The dove, you remember, went out once and again, but returned, because she "found no place to set her foot." At last she found a resting place, and she "did not return to him anymore"… The heavenly Dove searched 4,000 years for a sinless resting place in man and found none. In the first chapter of John He has found One to rest on.
The final flight also looks forward. The bird stayed away because the earth below her was fit to live in again.
The third sending out of the dove carries our thoughts on to the world to come, the days of the glorious Kingdom still to dawn for this sin-spoiled earth. Judgment will have cleared that scene of everything offensive to God. It will then be a fitting home for the Holy Spirit. The renewed earth was a fitting home for the dove; she returned to the ark no more. And in coming days the Holy Spirit will not be given only to those who are "in Christ," but will be poured out upon all flesh.
- Silence — The dove's failure to come back was itself the report; Noah read the absence and knew the earth was ready.
- Patience — He waited seven more days before the final test. The restless raven pictures our hurry; the dove teaches waiting for God's time.
- Sequence — Three flights, three stages: no rest at all, then one olive leaf from a world still under water, then a home.
- Ground — The dove settles only where judgment is over. So the Spirit came only after Christ finished the work of atonement.
- Person — The bird that stayed away points to the Spirit resting on Christ, and on to a renewed earth where God will pour Him out on all flesh.
And it came to pass in the six hundred and first year, in the first [month], on the first of the month, that the waters were dried up from the earth. And Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and behold, the surface of the ground was dried.
A date opens this verse: the first day of the first month of Noah's six hundred and first year. After ten and a half months shut inside, he lifts the covering, looks out, and sees dry ground — yet he does not step out.
The verse gives an exact date. One writer explains why the ground can look dry here while the whole earth is not dry for another two months:
Ten and a half months had now passed since Noah entered the ark. He removed the covering of the ark and found the face of the ground dry (v. 13). Of course it would be dry on the higher ground where the ark was. The lower areas needed more time for the waters to drain away. So verse 14 tells us that it was about two months later that the earth was dried. The total time comes to one year and ten days.
Noah had no clear view until the covering came off. One writer finds the reason in where the ark's openings were:
The door of the ark was in the side, but the window above. It is no new thing to say that this is faith's outlook. The passengers in that wonderfully guided and protected vessel did not need their eyes for steering. They were not to look out on the solemn scenes of judgment taking effect around them. Meanwhile the waters, which were the grave of the world, floated them above its mountain tops up to the blue heavens, growing calmer as they rose.
What Noah sees is more than the end of a storm. The dove had not come back. One writer reads Noah's uncovering of the ark as the act of a man who has understood why:
Beautiful mystery! The earth was redeemed from the curse now, and in its new-creation state the dove can delight. All of it is her native air. It is now the land of the turtledove and the olive, and Noah understands why this clean creature is absent. He at once removes the covering from the ark and looks out. The God of glory soon lets him out, as the God of all grace had before shut him in.
Noah sees dry ground, but the verse records no exit. He waits until God speaks. One commentator makes that restraint the heart of the verse:
His faith had been tested more than a little, but the prospect was comforting even from the first. "The face of the ground" was dry when he looked. After nearly two months more "the earth was dry." But even with this comfort, he still waited on God's word to go out, as he had gone in at His word. He will not rush ahead in the impulsiveness of nature and its self-confidence. He depends on God and obeys His word. The word came in due time, as it always does to those who look up to Him.
The ark carried its passengers safely through the judgment. But the dry ground shows God's purpose ran further than survival:
Meanwhile it was never God's mind that there should be life only, but liberty. Life out of death leads into liberty. Christ not only gives life and shelter, but does so as a preparation for the freedom of grace... now there is life. Death and judgment have done their worst on Him who is risen out of both. So there is liberty also for those given new life.
The same writer sets this drying against the world's future:
The waters of Noah did go over the earth, as surely as they shall go over it no more. A still more terrible destruction awaits it, however long the delay seems. By His word the heavens and earth that now exist are kept in store. They are reserved for fire on a day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men. The one is as certain as the other. But we, according to His promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells.
- Judgment — the waters that buried a world lifted the ark above its mountain tops. The flood carried Noah; it did not threaten him.
- Sight — the window was above, the door in the side. Only when the covering came off could Noah see the ground. Faith's outlook is upward before it is outward.
- Word — dry ground was not the signal to leave. Noah went in at God's word and waited to go out at God's word, refusing the impulsiveness of nature.
- Liberty — God never intended life alone, but liberty. Shelter in the ark prepared the way for freedom on a cleansed earth.
- Promise — water will never cover the earth again. The present heavens and earth are kept for fire on a day of judgment. The believer looks for new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells.
And in the second month, on the twenty-seventh day of the month, the earth was dry.
A single date closes the flood: the earth is dry at last, more than a year after the waters broke loose. Yet Noah is still inside the ark. If the ground is dry, why has he not stepped out?
The verse is the last entry in a careful log. One writer lays out every date in the account, from the first rain to this verse:
The account of the flood itself (Genesis 7:11 — Genesis 8:14) is very clear about how long it lasted and how far it reached. The tremendous rain lasted for 40 days and 40 nights. The waters prevailed from the 17th day of the 2nd month to the 17th day of the 7th month, when the ark grounded on the mountains of Ararat. On the 1st day of the 10th month the tops of the mountains appeared. On the 1st day of the 1st month of a new year the waters had vanished from the face of the earth. On the 27th day of the 2nd month the earth was dry enough for those in the ark to go out — one year and 10 days after it all began.
Verse 13 already said the ground was dry. This verse says it again, and the difference is height and time:
Ten and a half months had now passed since Noah entered the ark. He removed the covering of the ark and found the face of the ground dry (v. 13). Of course, the high ground where the ark rested would be dry first. Lower areas needed more time for the waters to drain away. So verse 14 tells us that the earth was dry about two months later.
Noah could see the change with his own eyes, and it comforted him. Still he did not move:
His faith had been tested hard, but the prospect was comforting even from the first. "The face of the ground" was dry when he looked. Nearly two months later "the earth had dried out." He was rightly stirred and comforted by this. Even so, he still waited for God's word before going out, just as he went in at His word. He will not rush ahead with the rashness and self-confidence of nature. He depends on God and obeys His word. The word came at the right time, as it always does to those who look up to Him.
The same writer notes how long Noah had already waited:
But it is beautiful to note how Noah can wait. Many days had passed before he opened the window of the ark. Many more passed while he tested the state of the renewed earth by the messengers he sent out again and again — and not in vain.
Waiting inside a dry world is its own test. One writer suggests Noah felt it once the ark had done its work:
After years of discipline and toil, Noah is in the ark. Very often the quality we are best known for, the one we have gained most from, deserts us, and we suffer much. Noah, no doubt, became impatient to leave the ark after it had accomplished its purpose. Nothing exposes our impatience and self-will like this… He worked for many a year to build the ark. Now he is impatient to abandon it, as soon as it has given him salvation… It is harder to stay in the place of blessing than even to reach it.
The dried earth is a new earth. One writer reads it as a picture of coming through death into life:
The flood swept away the ungodly. It brought judgment and death on the world. The ark rode above the waters and rested at last on the cleansed earth. It taught the lesson of life for the people of God, once they had passed through judgment and death. The new earth came up out of the waters of death. Noah and his family set their feet on the dry land as people saved through those waters, as people raised from the dead.
Dry ground is not the end. God's purpose goes beyond bare survival:
Meanwhile it never was the mind of God that there should be life only, but liberty. Life out of death ushers into liberty. Christ not only gives life and shelter, but this as a preparation for the freedom of grace.
- Dated. The flood is a record with exact markers, closing here at one year and ten days from the day the waters began.
- Dried. Verse 13 shows the high ground dry. Verse 14, two months later, shows the whole earth dry — the same drying, finished.
- Delayed. The earth was ready before Noah moved; he entered at God's word and would leave only at God's word.
- Disciplined. The hardest test came after the ark had done its work — staying in the place of blessing is harder than reaching it.
- Delivered. Dry land is resurrection ground, and God's aim there is not bare life but liberty.
And God spoke to Noah, saying,
The waters have gone down and the earth is dry, yet Noah is still inside the ark. He waits, and this verse is the moment God's word comes to him.
Noah could see for himself that the ground was dry. Yet seeing was not the same as going.
His faith had faced no small test, but the prospect was comforting even from the first. "The face of the ground" was dry when he looked. Almost two months later "the earth had dried out." This stirred and comforted him, and rightly so. Yet he still waited for God's word before going out, just as he went in at His word. He will not rush ahead with the rashness of nature and its self-confidence. He depends on God and obeys His word. And the word came in due time, as it always does to those who look up to Him.
The ark had two openings, and only one of them was his.
The ark had a window in it. The door was in the Lord's keeping, but the window was for Noah's use. The One who had shut him in was the only one who could let him out. The times and the seasons were in His hand. No one can shorten the time of his journey as a prisoner of hope. But the hopes of such a prisoner may be richly fed, and his spirit stirred within him.
Three commands frame Noah's story, and all three come from the same God. What he does after the last one shows where his faith rested.
"Then God said to Noah, 'Go out from the ark.'" The same God who had said, "Make yourself an ark," and "Go into the ark," now says, "Go out from the ark." "So Noah went out … and built an altar to the LORD." ALL is simple obedience. There is the obedience of faith and the worship of faith: both go together… Superstition would have worshipped the ark, since the ark was the means of salvation. The heart always tends to let what God appoints take God's place… But Noah's faith passed beyond the ark to the God of the ark. So when he stepped out, he did not look back at it with longing, and he did not treat it as an object of worship. He built an altar to the LORD and worshipped Him — and the ark is never heard of again.
The command reaches everyone aboard, not Noah alone.
Not one thing had gone into the ark thirteen months before which did not now come out. The small and the great had been in it, and the small were as safe as the great. The creeping thing from the ditch or the hedge was as free from danger and harm as Noah himself. Precious mystery! We may be little, and we are little, as the heart knows full well. But heaven, or the coming system of glory, has fitted itself, like the ark, to receive the small as well as the great.
Commentators see more here than one man's release. It pictures how God brings people through a coming trial instead of lifting them out of it.
Now comes the faithful word of God to His waiting and watching servant: how welcome to the prisoner of hope! It is the type of those kept safe through the great hour of temptation that will come on the whole inhabited world to test those who dwell on the earth… Christ's coming to receive His own to Himself for the Father's house on high follows a different pattern. It is not the pattern of Noah passing through the scene of judgment, but of Enoch taken up to heaven before the time of trouble came, as we may see in 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17.
Waiting inside a finished ark on a drying earth was a test of its own. The two birds Noah sent out show how a heart handles delay.
No doubt Noah became impatient to leave the ark once it had done its work. Nothing exposes our impatience or self-will so much as this… God stands vindicated, His truth has its witness, Noah and his house are saved — and now he wants to leave before it is God's will. It is harder to stay in the place of blessing than even to reach it… The freed raven, going back and forth, is a fitting picture of our restless, impatient spirits. The dove teaches Noah a different lesson… The dove tells him first that he must have patience.
- Word. The new world begins with God speaking. Noah moves at a word, not at the view from his window.
- Wait. He went out as he came in, at God's word. He could open the window, but only the Lord could open the door.
- Walk. Obedience and worship travel together. Noah leaves the ark and builds an altar, and the ark is never mentioned again — his faith rested on the God of the ark.
- Whole. Every creature that entered came out. The smallest was as safe as Noah himself, and the coming glory has room for small and great alike.
- Watch. The hardest test came after the rescue. The raven pictures our restlessness. The dove teaches patience. It is harder to stay in the place of blessing than to reach it.
Go out of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee.
The flood is over and the ground is dry, yet Noah does not move until God speaks. Why does a man already free to step out wait to be told? And what world is he stepping into?
Noah had already looked out and seen dry ground. He still did not move, and one writer reads that restraint as the mark of a tried faith.
His faith had been tried more than a little, but the prospect was comforting even from the first. "The face of the ground" was dry when he looked. Nearly two months later, "the earth was dry." This rightly moved and comforted him. Even so, he still waited on God's word to go out, as he went in at His word. He will not rush ahead with the impulsiveness of nature and its self-confidence. He depends on God and obeys His word. The word came in due time, as it always does to those who look up to Him.
Three commands shape Noah's whole story, and all three come from the same God.
"And God spoke to Noah, saying, go out from the ark." The same God who had said, "make yourself an ark," and "come into the ark," now says, "go out from the ark." "And Noah went out … and built an altar to the Lord." ALL is simple obedience. There is the obedience of faith and the worship of faith: both go together. Superstition would have worshipped the ark, since it was the means of salvation. The heart always tends to let the things God appoints take God's place. But Noah's faith went past the ark to the God of the ark. So when he stepped out, instead of looking back at the ark, he built an altar to the Lord and worshipped Him — and the ark is never heard of again.
The command sends Noah back to soil he had walked before the flood, but it is no longer the same soil.
He landed on the renewed earth. At that mysterious moment, all was in a great sense according to God's mind again. It was no longer corrupt, as it had been when he last walked on it in its old condition, but clean, refined by the judgment.
One writer moves from the ark's passengers to what heaven itself is made to hold.
Not one thing had gone into the ark thirteen months before that did not now come out. The small and the great had been in it, and the small were as safe as the great. The creeping thing of the ditch or the hedge was as free from all danger or harm as Noah himself. Precious mystery! We may be little, and we are little, as the heart knows full well. But heaven, or the coming system of glory, has fitted itself like the ark, to receive the small as well as the great.
Noah is not called out alone. God names his wife, his sons and their wives with him, and one writer draws a wide principle from that.
Some will say that Noah was a picture of Christ — the righteous head of a saved family, saved because of their connection with him. I grant all this. But Noah's role as a picture does not in any way interfere with the principle I am drawing from this and similar passages. I will state that principle plainly here at the start: the house of every servant of God is brought into a place of privilege, and of responsibility that follows, because of its connection with him.
Commentators also read this call out of the ark as a picture of a later rescue.
Now comes the faithful word of God to His waiting and watching servant. How welcome to the prisoner of hope! It is the picture of those kept safe through the great hour of temptation. That hour will come upon the whole inhabited world to test those who dwell on the earth.
Another writer pairs Noah with Enoch, and the two picture different groups.
Enoch is a figure of those caught up, Noah of the remnant of the Jews who go through the tribulation. In Noah the world is comforted — the figure of the millennium.
- Word in. Noah entered the ark because God spoke; the same voice, not the drying ground, moves him out.
- Word waited for. He could see the earth was dry, and still would not act on his own confidence. Faith that will not run ahead gets the word "in due time."
- Word obeyed. He goes out and builds an altar at once — worship for the God of the ark, not for the ark itself.
- Word wide enough. Everything that went in comes out again. The smallest creeping thing was as safe as Noah himself.
- Word ahead of us. Commentators read the call out of the ark as a picture of people kept safe through coming judgment. Enoch stands for another group — those caught up.
Bring forth with thee every animal which is with thee, of all flesh, fowl as well as cattle, and all the creeping things which creep on the earth, that they may swarm on the earth, and may be fruitful and multiply on the earth.
The flood is over, and God sends out every creature that came through it with Noah. Two things stand out: Noah will not move until God speaks, and the animals are named one by one and told to fill the earth again.
Noah could see for himself that the ground was dry, yet he did not move until God spoke.
His faith had been tried more than a little, but the prospect was comforting even from the first. "The face of the ground" was dry when he looked. Nearly two months later, "the earth was dry." He was rightly moved and comforted by this. Even so, he still waited on God's word to go out, just as he went in at His word. He will not rush ahead in the impulsiveness of nature and its self-confidence. He depends on God and obeys His word. And God gave the word in due time, as He always does to those who look up to Him.
The ark kept every creature alive; this verse sends them out to spread over the earth.
Meanwhile it never was the mind of God that there should be life only, but liberty. Life out of death ushers into liberty. Christ not only gives life and shelters, but does this as a preparation for the freedom of grace. With freedom He set us free. The law had long tested human nature, and its mind proved hostile to God. But now there is life, after death and judgment have done their worst to Him who is risen out of both. So there is liberty as well for those born again.
They step out onto an earth that is not the one they left.
Noah went out. He landed on the renewed earth. At that mysterious moment all was, in a great sense, according to God's mind again. It was no longer corrupt, as when he had last walked on it in its old condition, but clean, under the refining of the judgment.
God names birds, animals and creeping things one by one, and tells them to multiply. Their future is tied to man's.
Jehovah deals with the creatures set under the headship of Adam. How blessed to know, on authority beyond doubt, that "the creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the sons of God"! It will "be set free from its bondage to corruption and obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God." As man's sin dragged it down with himself into ruin, so shall the Second Man raise it out of its degradation and misery.
The same writer applies this directly to the day when Christ reigns openly: "the merely animal creation is to rejoice; and indeed all that is now travailing and groaning through the fall of its head."
The old world went under the water, and Noah steps out onto a new one.
In Noah, we have a plain figure of resurrection, the whole world passing away in the judgment of the flood, and a new world emerging from the baptismal waters. The apostle Peter teaches us to see in this a type of salvation (1 Peter 3:20-21). And to the man in Christ, risen with Him, the old has passed away and all things have become new. The figure is very plain here, although many a detail may be hidden from us.
Others read it forward as well as inward. Noah brought safely through the judgment is taken as "the type of those preserved through the great hour of temptation which shall come upon all the habitable world," while those taken to heaven before the trouble begins are pictured instead by Enoch.
- Word. Noah went in at God's word, and he would not come out without it. Dry ground was not permission; the command was.
- Life. The ark kept every creature alive, but life alone was never the aim — "it never was the mind of God that there should be life only, but liberty."
- Ground. They step out onto an earth refined by the judgment that passed over it — "no longer corrupt... but clean."
- Creation. God names the animals and tells them to multiply. They fell with man, their head, and the Second Man will lift them out of ruin. Creation is still waiting for the sons of God to be revealed.
- Picture. The whole scene is a figure of resurrection: the old world gone in judgment, a new world out of the water. Peter takes it up as a type of salvation.
And Noah went out, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him.
A year had passed since the door closed. The ground was dry, but Noah did not move until God spoke — and when he stepped out, everything that went in came out with him.
The ground had been dry for weeks. Noah had pulled back the ark's covering and seen it. What kept him inside was not the weather but his habit of taking direction from God.
"The face of the ground" was dry when he looked, and after nearly two more months "the earth had dried out." Though this rightly stirred and comforted him, he still waited on God's word to go out, just as he went in at His word. He will not rush ahead in the impulsiveness of nature and its self-confidence. He depends on God and obeys His word. And the word came in due time, as it always does to those who look up to Him.
That wait was harder than it looks. The real test came not while the flood raged, but after the ark had done its work.
After years of discipline and toil, Noah is in the ark. Very often the quality we are most known for, and from which we have gained most, deserts us, and we suffer much. Noah, no doubt, became impatient to leave the ark once it had done its work... God had been vindicated, His truth witnessed to, Noah and his house saved; and now he wants to leave before it is God's will. It is harder to stay in the place of blessing than even to reach it.
The earth Noah walks onto is not the earth he left.
The flood swept away the ungodly. It brought judgment and death on the world. The ark was carried up above the waters and finally rested on the cleansed earth. It taught the lesson of life for the people of God after judgment and death had been passed through. The new earth emerged from the waters of death. Noah and his family set their feet on the dry land as those saved through those waters, as risen from the dead.
Count the names here against the list of those who went in. Nothing was lost.
Not one thing had gone into the ark thirteen months before that did not now come out. The small and the great had been in it, and the small were as safe as the great. The creeping thing from the ditch or the hedge was as free from all danger or harm as Noah himself. Precious mystery! We may be little, and we are little, as the heart knows well. But heaven — the coming system of glory — has fitted itself, like the ark, to receive the small as well as the great.
The verse names four men and four women. God had invited one man.
The ground on which the Lord commands Noah to enter the ark with his household is, "for I have seen that you are righteous before me in this generation." Someone might object that probably all the household were righteous before God too, but the later history of one of them — Ham (Genesis 9:22-25) — forbids that thought. The force of the statement cannot be weakened in any way: the family of Noah was delivered from the judgment of the flood because of the faith of its head. True, it was not salvation; but it was so in figure (1 Peter 3:20-21). And it was no small blessing to be carried in the ark through that mighty flood.
Noah steps out and builds an altar. He does not cling to the ark that saved him.
The same God who had said, "Make yourself an ark," and "Go into the ark," now says, "Go out from the ark." "So Noah went out... and built an altar to the LORD." It is all simple obedience. There is the obedience of faith and the worship of faith: both go together... Superstition would have worshipped the ark, since it was the means of salvation. The heart always tends to put God's ordinances in God's place... But Noah's faith passed beyond the ark to the God of the ark. So when he stepped out, he did not look back at it or treat it as an object of worship. He built an altar to the LORD and worshipped Him. And the ark is never heard of again.
- In by the word. Noah entered the ark because God said so, and his household came in with him on the strength of one man's faith.
- Kept by the word. The waters that destroyed everything outside carried everything inside. The smallest creature was as safe as Noah himself.
- Out by the word. Dry ground was in plain sight. He still waited for God to speak, refusing the self-confidence that moves a day too soon.
- Out onto new ground. The eight step onto an earth that judgment has cleared, as people brought through death to the other side.
- Out into worship. The first act on the new earth is an altar, not a monument. Faith goes past the ark to the God of the ark, and the ark is never mentioned again.
All the animals, all the creeping things, and all the fowl -- everything that moves on the earth, after their kinds, went out of the ark.
The flood is over and the ark empties. Every creature that had been shut inside walks out onto a washed, empty earth, grouped by families. Why does the record name each class of creature? And why do they leave only when God says so?
Noah did not decide the moment. He had gone in when God told him, and he stayed until God told him to leave.
His faith had been tested more than a little, but the prospect was comforting from the first. "The face of the ground was dry" when he looked. Nearly two months later "the earth had dried out." Yet even though his heart was rightly stirred and comforted, he still waited for God's word before going out, just as he went in at His word. He will not rush ahead in the rashness of human nature and its self-confidence. He depends on God and obeys His word. And the word came at the right time, as it always does to those who look up to Him.
That waiting cost him something. Once the ark had done its work, staying inside became the harder test.
Noah, no doubt, became impatient to leave the ark once it had served its purpose. Nothing exposes our impatience or self-will so much as this. God has been vindicated. His truth has had its witness. Noah and his house are saved. And now he wants to leave before it is God's will. It is harder to stay in the place of blessing than to reach it.
The list leaves nothing out. It names creeping things beside beasts and birds, and the same number that went in comes out.
Not one thing had gone into the ark thirteen months before which did not now come out. The small and the great had been in it, and the small were as safe as the great. The creeping thing from the ditch or the hedge was as free from danger or harm as Noah himself. Precious mystery! We may be little, and we are little, as the heart knows full well. But heaven, the coming world of glory, has fitted itself like the ark to receive the small as well as the great.
The verse sorts the creatures into groups. The word translated "beast" carries a precise range of meaning.
The ordinary use of this word distinguishes all animals from man, and marks off four-footed animals from birds and creeping things, Gen. 8:19. The word is also used symbolically: for the ignorance of man and his acting as a creature without reason or conscience before God, and for great worldly powers, such as the four great kingdoms in Daniel 7.
They leave under orders, and the going out starts the repopulating of the world.
Nothing is said about anyone being anxious to leave the ark. Had they become so used to living there that they were hesitant to leave? God gave them orders to go out, however, including all the people and all the animals of every kind. Whether at first they returned there for shelter at night we are not told. The animals, sent back into their natural surroundings, would then breed and multiply.
Man's fall dragged the animals down with him. That link explains why they belong in the story at all.
Man, by his sin, has not only brought ruin on himself but has spoiled his home and dragged down all the creatures that depend on him. Thorns and thistles are marks of man's sin, and much more the groans of the animal creation (Gen. 3:18). Man, unlike angels, was made by God the centre of a system of things. The whole of this lower creation either suffers or rejoices with its head.
Survival was never the whole point. God's purpose reaches past shelter to freedom.
Meanwhile it never was the mind of God that there should be life only, but liberty. Life out of death brings us into liberty. Christ not only gives life and shelter; He does it to prepare us for the freedom of grace.
- Command — Noah went out as he went in: at God's word, refusing to move on his own judgment even when the ground looked dry.
- Composure — the harder discipline was staying put. It is harder to remain in the place of blessing than to reach it.
- Completeness — every creature that entered came out, the creeping thing as safe as Noah himself.
- Classes — they go out by families: beasts, birds and creeping things, each kind sent to fill the earth again.
- Consequence — creation suffers or rejoices with man, its head. So man's rescue is creation's rescue, and life through death opens into liberty.
And Noah built an altar to Jehovah; and took of every clean animal, and of all clean fowl, and offered up burnt-offerings on the altar.
Noah steps out of the ark onto an earth just emptied by judgment. The first thing he does is not build a shelter but raise an altar. That choice raises three questions: why sacrifice at a fresh start, why only clean animals, and what did God see in the rising smoke?
Until this verse the Bible records offerings but never an altar.
The word "altar" is mentioned here for the first time in the Bible. The altar is for worship. Here then worship is for the first time revealed. We worship, having passed from the old into the new, standing on the ground of resurrection. We know that death and judgment are past, and therefore we worship in spirit and in truth. Christ is our altar, and the sacrifices Noah brought are a picture of Christ too. Only the person who knows Christ and the perfect work He has done is a true worshipper.
The ark had just carried Noah through judgment. He might have treasured it. Instead it vanishes from the story here.
Everything is simple obedience. There is the obedience of faith and the worship of faith: both go together. The altar is set up where, just before, all had been a scene of death and judgment... Superstition would have worshipped the ark, as being the means of salvation. The heart always tends to put God's appointed means in God's own place. The ark was a very clear and obvious appointed means. But Noah's faith passed beyond the ark to the God of the ark. So when he stepped out of it, he cast no lingering look back at it, and he did not treat it as an object of worship or reverence. He built an altar to the Lord and worshipped Him. And the ark is never heard of again.
Noah had taken these animals aboard to keep their kinds alive. He offered them up anyway.
Before the flood Noah had been occupied with building an ark for himself and his household. After the flood we find him intent on building an altar for God... He held back none of the small stock of acceptable animals that came out with him from the ark. They had gone in with him to keep their kinds alive on the earth, yet he felt it was right to offer some of them on the altar to God. So his offering shows the thankfulness of his heart. But in it we see something more: the ground on which all blessing could now rest — a sacrifice accepted by the Lord.
The verse assumes Noah could tell a clean animal from an unclean one. Where did that knowledge come from?
Before the flood Noah already knew this essential part of an acceptable sacrifice (Gen. 7:2), though there is no record of how he learned it. But in the law we read God's definition of clean beasts and clean birds, and we find moral teaching tied to the subject (Lev. 11). So we must conclude that no man could have worked out by his own instinct which creatures God would count clean, and which He would not.
The record mentions no prayer and no song at the altar — only what God perceived.
Yet as far as we know, no prayer was spoken on that solemn occasion, and the patriarch raised no hymn of praise... It may have been a silent service. We read of nothing that God had heard, but only of what He smelled. A silent service perhaps, yet how full of meaning to Him, and instruction to us.
The altar is built to the LORD — Jehovah, as some translations print the name. One writer says that name, and not God, is the exact one here.
"And Noah," it is written in verse 20, "built an altar." To whom? To God? Most fittingly it is to Jehovah now. The two names could not be swapped without loss... It is Noah's relationship that appears here. The sacrifice offered there bore witness to the special place in which he stood.
Noah's altar did more than express thanks. The whole future of the earth rested on it.
Noah acted on this after the flood. His first recorded act was to build an altar and offer up whole burnt offerings of every clean beast and of all clean birds. For the earth after the flood was held on the ground of sacrifice.
And the rising smoke pointed forward.
In this the patriarch acknowledged that atonement was his only possible ground for standing before a holy God. That is a striking lesson for people in every age. As that lone column of smoke rose to heaven, "the LORD smelled the pleasing aroma." His mind ran on from that altar to Calvary. There, in due time, the great sacrifice would be offered, and every other sacrifice pointed to it.
- Altar first. Once rescued, Noah builds an altar before he builds a house. Obedience of faith and worship of faith go together.
- Ground, not gratitude only. The offering thanks God for the past, but its greater meaning is the ground on which all blessing could now rest.
- Costly ground. He held back none of the small stock of clean animals entrusted to him to keep their kinds alive.
- Taught ground. No one could guess by instinct which creatures God counts clean. Noah offered what God had already marked out as acceptable.
- Lasting ground. The earth after the flood was held on the ground of sacrifice — and that lone column of smoke pointed on to Calvary.
And Jehovah smelled the sweet odour. And Jehovah said in his heart, I will no more henceforth curse the ground on account of Man, for the thought of Man's heart is evil from his youth; and I will no more smite every living thing, as I have done.
Noah steps out of the ark onto a washed world and builds an altar. God is pleased — and the very reason He gave for sending the flood now becomes His reason for never sending another.
Older versions render the "pleasing aroma" as "a sweet savour." One writer gives a second rendering of the phrase, and shows what the offering secures for the one who brings it:
Here we have the sacrifice presenting a "sweet savour," or "a savour of rest," to God. It is what He finds His rest and delight in. And in its excellence the offerer finds the ground of his acceptance. The term burnt offering occurs here for the first time. We discover what it means in particular when we come to the book of Leviticus.
The flood did not improve anyone. Comparing God's words here with what He said before the judgment, one writer notes a small but sharp shift in wording:
Man had not improved, so there was no reason for God to deal with him differently. The Lord's estimate of man after the flood differed little, if at all, from that before it. Compare Genesis 6:5 with Genesis 8:21. Before the flood God spoke of evil as being constantly in the heart of His creature man. After it He declared it was innate. "The intention of man's heart is evil from his youth."
Notice the word "for" in the verse. One writer sets the reason God gives here beside the reason God gave for the flood:
It is interesting too that in Genesis 6:5 the reason for the flood was that "the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually." Yet this same fact becomes a reason that God would not curse the earth again (v. 21). Since man's heart is evil from his youth, God would not again curse the earth or destroy every living thing out of it. The reason is that in the sacrifice of Christ there is a remedy for man's evil nature.
The altar changes what God's eye rests on, and the principle reaches far past Noah:
The reason God gave for not cursing is that He looks to Noah's sacrifice, not to the sin. God deals with us on the ground of what the Mediator is, instead of what we are. The sacrifice ought to be always in our hearts, but it is always before God.
But the offering did not win God over. The same writer is careful about what the sweet savour does:
There was to be no repetition of the curse. Otherwise the Lord might have been always at it, for every thought of man's heart was only evil, and that continually. But on the ground of sacrifice this was said: "the Lord smelled a sweet savour, and the Lord said in his heart, I will no more again curse." He would not again act as He had done. The effect of this sweet savour is very striking. It does not change God's mind; it reveals what He is — the source of peace.
God speaks this promise to Himself before He speaks it to anyone else:
When the Lord smelled the savour of Noah's sacrifice, He said in His heart that He would not again curse the ground. But that was just His own purpose and grace. For a time it was the secret of His own heart. In due time He made His purpose and grace known to Noah. Then Noah took the blessing in a way of special sweetness. He took it as coming from the deep, well-considered, and fully approved counsels and affections of the heart of the Lord Himself.
The pleasure was never in the dead animals themselves:
For God the sweet savour was in what the offerings meant: a new world brought in on the ground of the sacrifice of Christ, His own Son. God had no more pleasure in the actual death of Noah's animals than in those killed on Jewish altars. Hebrews 10:6 says as much: "In burnt offerings and sin offerings you have taken no pleasure."
And what God rests in, the believer may rest in as well:
We must have a basis of approach to God. And more than this: we must be fully accepted, to be completely at rest there. If God finds a savour of rest in the death of Christ, we find our rest there too.
- Rest offered. The aroma is also rendered "a savour of rest." Scripture names the burnt offering here for the first time, and God finds His rest and delight in it.
- Rest despite man. The flood washed the earth but not the heart; God's verdict is now even sharper — evil is there from youth, innate.
- Rest instead of curse. The same fact that justified the flood becomes the reason for never repeating it. A sacrifice now stands between God's eye and man's sin.
- Rest revealed, not negotiated. The offering did not change God's mind. It showed what He is. He spoke the promise in His own heart before telling Noah.
- Rest shared. What God rests in at Noah's altar points on to Christ. Whoever trusts that sacrifice rests where God rests.
Henceforth, all the days of the earth, seed [time] and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night, shall not cease.
After the flood, God makes a promise that has ruled the world ever since. As long as the earth lasts, the seasons will keep their round. Two questions follow. Why is the promise safe when man's heart has not changed? And how long do the words "while the earth remains" run?
The promise comes straight after Noah's burnt offering. That order decides everything.
No one can deny that God in His sovereignty has blessed man unconditionally. On what ground have the millions of our race since Noah's day enjoyed seedtime and harvest, summer and winter, day and night? Have these been conditional blessings?… Genesis 8:20-22 makes it clear. We have these blessings only on the ground of sacrifice — Noah's burnt offering, a type of Christ. If God gave them on the ground of men's conduct, men would have forfeited them long ago.
The flood washed the earth clean. What did it do to the heart inside man?
The cleansing of the waters of judgment had made no change in the imaginations of the thoughts of man's heart. They were still evil, and only evil. The heart was uncured, for "that which is born of the flesh is flesh," though there be water to cleanse or fire to refine. It was no change there which gave the Lord thoughts of peace and not of evil towards men.
Something new starts here. Compare it with the earlier blessing of paradise.
With the new method of dealing with men, God would bring in a stability unknown before… To man in innocence God made no such announcement. Whether the blessing of paradise lasted depended on his obedience. The flood broke the natural order of the seasons: seedtime and harvest stopped for a year. Because of the sacrifice, nothing will break that order again as long as the earth remains. Man can count on this; and man has proved it. God has often held back the earth's full crop, but the seasons have kept running their round.
Three pairs cover the whole year between them.
When God created the lights in the sky He said, "Let them be for signs and for seasons." It is well known that the different seasons on the earth come largely from the days being longer or shorter, so the earth gets more or less of the sun's heat. After the flood, God declared that while the earth remained the seasons should continue, Genesis 8:22. They fall roughly like this: seedtime, cold and winter run from October to March; harvest, heat and summer run from April to September.
The promise holds the seasons steady. It does not lift the curse on the ground.
Then after the flood God secures seedtime and harvest. Farming is blessed in a way. The curse is not gone, but man is comforted. So I should think it takes less work to get things out of the earth now than it did before the flood.
The promise has an end date. One writer traces the whole span.
The sign or token of this covenant with creation is the rainbow in the cloud. Under it the earth has continued until the present time, and it will continue throughout the millennial period. Then Christ will deliver up the kingdom to the Father. The heaven and the earth will pass away and give place to the new heaven and the new earth — the everlasting state, in which God shall be all in all.
Anyone can test the promise by looking at the record:
Few things show the divine perfection stamped on the Bible more than its unfailing accuracy about what has already been fulfilled. More than four thousand years ago, Jehovah said, "While the earth remains, seedtime and harvest … shall not cease" (Gen. 8:22); and do they not continue to this day?
One writer carries the verse beyond farming, into the way God deals with what we sow.
The reaping does not come as soon as the seed is sown. So we need patience. But reap we shall — in due season, and God, not we, is Judge as to when the fitting season arrives. Still, arrive it certainly shall. Genesis 8:22 stands true even in this connection.
- Cause — The seasons keep going on the ground of Noah's burnt offering, a type of Christ. They do not rest on human conduct.
- Contrast — The flood left man's heart uncured. God's promise rests on the sacrifice He accepted, not on any change in man.
- Gift — Adam never had this. The seasons now run in a fixed order that no longer hangs on man's obedience.
- Limit — The curse on the ground is eased, not lifted. The promise runs only "while the earth remains" — through the millennium, up to the new heaven and new earth.
- Lesson — Seedtime and harvest never fail. So sowing and reaping hold good in the moral world too: the harvest is delayed, never denied.
And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said to them, Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth.
The flood has ended and the ark is empty. God now speaks the first words to a re-started human race: a blessing, and a command to fill the earth again. But the wording is not quite what Adam heard in Eden, and the difference tells us where mankind now stands.
The earth has been cleared by water, and God now sets man in it on fresh terms.
Water has washed the earth clean. That gives a whole new set of conditions for people and animals. God now sets man in a new order of things. He blesses Noah and his sons, promising that they will be fruitful and will multiply to fill the earth, which had lost so many of its people.
That blessing does not come because the survivors were better than those who drowned. God had already said in His heart what man is, and He says the blessing anyway.
The new world, like the old, began its course with blessing from its Creator. "God blessed Noah." But first God gave a solemn witness. Before He spoke the blessing and the commands that came with it, He showed that the survivors of the flood were unchanged. They had the same nature as those whose sin had ruined them (Gen. 8:21). God had declared man completely corrupt before He judged the world by the flood. He says it again as the second father of the human family starts out. But now it was for mercy, not for judgment, that God spoke these words.
The command is to spread out, and the emphasis falls on the whole globe.
Notice God's command to man as he entered the restored earth. It was to refill that earth — not parts of the earth, but the earth. He wanted men spread out across the world. He did not want them clustered together, relying on their own gathered strength. We will see in Gen. 11 how man ignored all this.
Man refused this command outright.
After the flood, His word to Noah and his sons was still, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth." But mankind, though awed by that judgment, had no desire to do His will. They wanted to stay together... their aim was to set themselves up as a universal republic without God.
God said almost the same words to Adam. But He added something for Adam that Noah never got.
"Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth," God had said to Adam. "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth," He also said to Noah and his sons. But to Adam He added what He did not add to Noah — "and subdue it." Was this omission accidental? To subdue the earth was God's original design for man on earth. By the fall he lost that place, and can never regain it. Another Man will do it — the Head of the new creation.
Noah gets more at the table than Adam did. He gets less authority. His standing is different.
He is "blessed," as Adam was in his day, and told to "be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth." (Gen. 1:28; Gen. 9:1) ... God put the earth under Adam, and the creatures of the forest, the field, the sea and the air recognized him as their master... Now the creatures of the earth only stand in dread and fear of Noah... Yet Noah's table was better spread than Adam's had been at first... For Adam's was the food fitting an innocent one, Noah's is the food of a ransomed one.
With the blessing comes a job: Noah is to hold the earth for God, not just enjoy it.
God commands him to fill the earth, as He had commanded Adam at the beginning. He is to order and govern it. He is to carry on his religious service and keep up his testimony to God in it. Government is his, and in company with priesthood too.
The failure comes at once.
The first thing Noah does after God had blessed him is to get drunk.
So the blessing points past Noah to someone who will hold it without failing.
Here we see Christ, the true Noah, Heir of the new earth. Of that earth we read, "no longer will there be anything accursed." All things in it are handed over to Him.
- Mercy first. God gives His verdict on man's heart before the blessing, not after. So the blessing comes from mercy, not because man had improved.
- Blessing given. The new world opens just as the old one did — with the Creator's blessing on fruitfulness and increase.
- Reach commanded. The charge covers the whole earth, not parts of it. In Genesis 11 man refuses to scatter and stays gathered around himself.
- One word withheld. "Subdue it" is absent. Adam lost that place at the fall. One writer points ahead to another Man, the Head of the new creation, who will do it.
- Result foreshadowed. God blesses Noah as a ransomed man and gives him government. Noah fails almost at once. The blessing holds in the true Noah, Heir of a new earth where nothing is accursed.
And let the fear of you and the dread of you be upon every animal of the earth, and upon all fowl of the heavens upon all that moveth [on] the ground; and upon all the fishes of the sea into your hand are they delivered.
Noah steps out of the ark onto a washed but still fallen earth, and God hands the animal world over to him. The terms are new: fear and dread, not the willing subjection Adam knew.
Adam met the animals as their namer. Noah meets them as the man they run from. One writer traces the change to how God acts in each scene.
What a different dominion from Adam's! God there, as Creator, puts all living animals under Adam's power; he names them. Here, God is a preserver, a saviour. But He only places the animals in Noah's power, and fear marks the relationship. Noah is their destroyer, and they fear him… This clearly sets the whole thing on a new system and footing.
The world God now speaks to is not the world of Eden. He deals with it as it is.
Now it was a fallen world. God blessed these men and charged them to fill the earth, and the fear and the dread of them were to be upon every beast and bird, with reptile and fish. God delivered the creatures into men's hand. Sin was everywhere, and God took it into account as a fact that could not be ignored.
This fear is not only a loss. Set against the strength of animals, it is a protection.
This is a great mercy. Beasts are stronger than man, and if they had no fear of him, they could all but wipe out the human race. So God has planted that fear in them. They no longer have a nature that submits to man of its own accord, as they did in the garden of Eden.
Noah does not receive this gift where Adam stood. One writer contrasts the two men and the ground each of them stood on.
God created Adam alone, and in "His own image," and made him the responsible head over an unfallen creation. But "Noah found favor in the eyes of the Lord." God led him into the ark, through it, and out of it on the other side of death and judgment, as a redeemed man. He was to begin a new history in another world, under God's promises and covenanted blessings… It is on this new ground that God gave the world out afresh to him.
Something lost is handed back here. Notice what the gift includes.
Then their authority over the lower creatures is restored. The fear and dread of man is to be upon every beast of the earth, and upon all that moves, and God delivers them into his hand. All things are his, and even death itself is now to furnish him with food. This fact carries the deepest meaning. It is death serving life, and God would keep us always mindful of that principle.
Noah on a renewed earth points beyond himself. Commentators see in him a picture of Christ ruling the world to come.
If Adam is a picture of Christ as the Head over all things, and as the Head of the Church, then Noah, stepping onto a renewed earth, is a picture of the Lord Jesus as the Governor of the world to come… This is very similar to what God says of man in Psalm 8. It shows that Noah, as well as Adam, pointed forward to the coming Son of Man, with all things put under Him.
That kingdom will be settled and at rest. A sacrifice stands behind it.
All this was very significant, telling us of the character of that kingdom which is to arise in the last days, when the true Noah takes the dominion. Then the earth and its creatures will be established in the covenant of lasting rest and certainty… And then the Lord God will rest in His full delight in it all. It will all stand in the sweet savour of the sacrifice which the Son of His love has offered.
- Cause. Adam named the animals; Noah is given their fear. Sin made the difference, and God deals with the world as it is.
- Gift. Noah receives it as a redeemed man, brought through death and judgment on the ground of an accepted sacrifice.
- Mercy. Animals are stronger than we are. The fear God plants in them guards the human race.
- Reach. The gift covers beasts, birds, creeping things and fish. Even death now feeds life.
- Result. Noah on a renewed earth pictures the true Noah, the Son of Man. Under Him the earth will rest in lasting peace.
Every moving thing that liveth shall be food for you as the green herb I give you everything.
After the flood God blesses Noah and sets the terms for a new world. One of those terms is a wider table, which raises three questions: why God widened it, what it now costs, and what He kept back.
Before the flood, man and beast lived on plants. Commentators read this as a real enlargement, given with no restrictions attached:
Besides this, mankind was no longer limited to a vegetarian diet (v.2). God allowed him animals, birds and fish as food, just as fully as herbs and fruits. There were no restrictions like the ones God later gave Israel under law (Lev. 11), and then set aside after the death of the Lord Jesus (Acts 10:11-16; 1 Tim. 4:4-5). Of course, if someone finds that a food gives him physical trouble, it is only wise to avoid it. But God does not forbid the use of any.
Did animals eat one another before this? Commentators differ. One writer holds that every beast, bird and creeping thing first fed on green plants, "and they may not have become carnivorous until after the flood, when flesh was given to man to eat." He allows the other view too: that sin had already changed them, and God held them in check in the ark. (Morrish Bible Dictionary)
This gift works through death. Man's food now comes from creatures that die for him, and one writer finds deep meaning in that:
All things are his, and now even death itself supplies him with food. This fact carries the deepest significance. It is death serving life, and God would keep that principle constantly before us. Almost every meal testifies to us of the very basis of all real gospel, which the Lord's supper declares in full and formal terms.
The very next verse forbids eating flesh with its blood. One writer shows why that single limit matters so much:
God now gave every moving thing that lives to be food for man (Gen. 9:3), as freely as He had first given green plants to beast and bird and reptile (Gen. 1:30). But He placed a clear restriction on the blood. Man was not to eat it (Gen. 9:4). The blood was the life, and God reserved it for Himself. Giving man the freedom to eat animals made God's claim stand out all the more. Life belonged to God, and it will go badly for those who despise or defy His rights... This is no longer the dominion given by the Creator. Now He gives permission, and He forbids.
One writer adds that Christians are given more than Noah was:
Only after we know deliverance, and in the new place with God, can this be rightly understood. We now go farther than the type and past the restriction imposed here: we drink the blood also. What is God's alone as atonement is ours to sustain and cheer us, as atonement now made.
Later God told Israel which animals they could and could not eat. One writer asks why, and finds the answer in standing, not diet:
After the flood, God gave man a grant of every moving living creature for food (Gen. 9:3). Here, under the law, He brings in restrictions... But why these restrictions? Because the law puts man at a distance from God and makes him feel it. It is also meant to teach him the great difference between standing on the ground of keeping the law and standing on the ground of grace... How free was the grant to Noah and his sons! How strict the restrictions placed on Israel!
Some would make holiness a matter of avoiding certain foods. One writer names where that idea comes from, and answers it from this grant:
Demons play on man's sense of defilement. As the cure they suggest staying away from certain foods and from marriage — the very things God has provided for His creature's good. So they make God out to be the author of man's lack of piety... Nothing that God has provided for His creature defiles. Every creature of God is good, and nothing is to be refused if it is received with thanksgiving, because the word of God and prayer sanctify it — that is, God's grant to Noah (Gen. 9:3-4) and the thanksgiving of the one who receives it.
That leaves our part. God has spoken; the thanks are ours:
In Genesis 9:3, we find how the word of God put an ample supply of food at man's disposal. It is sad if Christian households do not complete this sanctification by prayer as they use the food He has so mercifully provided.
- Granted — after the flood man is no longer limited to plants. Animals, birds and fish are food now, as fully as herbs and fruit, with no forbidden list.
- Purchased — food now comes by death. Nearly every meal says the same thing: life kept alive by another's death.
- Reserved — God kept back the blood, because the blood is the life. The wider the freedom, the clearer His claim.
- Contrasted — Israel's food laws taught distance under law. Noah's free grant shows what grace looks like.
- Received — nothing God provides defiles. Rules that ban His food attack the Giver, and thanksgiving at our table completes the grant.
Only, the flesh with its life, its blood, ye shall not eat.
God had just given Noah and his sons a new freedom. Every moving creature could now be food. But God kept one thing back. Man must not eat the blood, because the blood is the life.
The gift and the limit come in the same breath. Man gains a wide new freedom at the table, and God marks off one thing as His.
God now gave man every moving thing that lives for food (Gen. 9:3), as freely as He had first given green plants to beast and bird and reptile (Gen. 1:30). But He put a clear limit on the blood. Man was not to eat it (Gen. 9:4). The blood was the life, and God kept it for Himself. Letting man use animals for food made God's claim stand out all the more. Life belonged to God, and woe to those who despise or defy His rights.
The words "flesh with its life, that is, its blood" are packed tight. One writer works through the Hebrew behind them. The verse does not name two separate things, flesh and life. It means flesh while the life is still in it.
From Genesis 9:4 it is clear, I think, that the expression means flesh in its living state; that is what must not be eaten. And that state — of ruined flesh — lies in its blood… The verse comes in to show that the term means flesh with the life in it — flesh in its living state — which is the blood.
Behind the rule lies a question of ownership. Man may kill an animal for food, but the life in it is not his to take.
To eat blood denied the rights of God the Creator. Even though man forfeited his own right by sin, the LORD kept His title over life untouched. God set up human government in the first place to deal with death by deliberate violence. Shed blood is the sign of that death, and it belongs to God alone. Man has no right to take it for himself.
One writer sets the ban against Eden, where God closed the way back to the tree of life. To eat life would be to seize by force what sin had already lost.
To eat the blood would have been a bold taking back of what he had lost through sin — an attempt to win life again by forcing the way that the cherubim's sword guarded. This rule told the sinner that he had lost his right to the tree of life and can never return to it in his own strength. The life has gone back to God. The blood is His. And the gospel comes to tell us how He has used it, even providing with it and through it new, eternal life that cannot fail for the sinner who is dead.
God kept the blood back from man's table because He had His own use for it. One rule teaches man three things about himself, and ends in a gift.
Life belongs to God, so no one of the human race was to eat blood. The sinner has also forfeited his life. He can only live before God on the basis of the death of a sacrifice in his place… So the ban on eating blood reminds us of three important truths. We are creatures, and must remember it. We were sinners by nature, and are to acknowledge it. We owe atonement by blood entirely to God, and are always to own it. The One to whom life belongs has given it to be poured out for our everlasting blessing.
God spoke this word to Noah centuries before Moses, and through him to the whole human family. That timing shapes how the apostles later handled it.
This law pressed on Israel what God had already laid down for Noah after the flood, in Genesis 9:4. So when the apostles and elders gave the same command to Gentile believers in Acts 15:20 and 29, they were not loading them with a mere item of the law of Moses. They were repeating a ban that applies to everyone. We do well to keep it, though we need not copy the extreme carefulness of the Jews, as the instruction of 1 Corinthians 10:25 shows.
- Gift — God handed over every moving creature for food, as freely as He once gave green plants. The limit sits inside a gift.
- Reserve — He keeps back one thing: the blood. The wider the freedom to eat, the clearer His claim.
- Reason — The blood is the life, and life belongs to God. Leaving it alone is how man admits he is a creature, not the owner of life.
- Meaning — Man forfeited his life by sin. To eat life would be to seize back what he lost. The blood goes to God, and God uses it for atonement.
- Reach — God gave this word to Noah for the whole race, long before the law. He pressed it on Israel, and the apostles gave it again to Gentile believers in Acts 15.
And indeed your blood, [the blood] of your lives, will I require at the hand of every animal will I require it, and at the hand of Man, at the hand of each [the blood] of his brother, will I require the life of Man.
After the flood, God sets up a new order for Noah's family. They may eat animals, but not the blood. And God warns that He will call every killer of a human being to account. Two questions follow. Why does God claim the blood? And does a word spoken to one family still hold for everyone?
Permission to eat meat came with one limit: not the blood. That limit sets up the demand here. Giving man more freedom made God's own claim stand out.
Man was not to eat the blood. It was the life, and God kept it for Himself. Letting man use animals for food made God's claim stand out all the more. Life belonged to God, and it will go badly for those who despise or defy His rights. This is the state of a fallen world. God is a Preserver, or a Saviour, of all people, as the apostle says — especially of those who believe.
God's claim reaches past human killers. He says He will require the life at the hand of every beast.
The life of a man killed by a beast — "from every beast I will require it." So we see that God keeps His right over life, even a beast's life. They must come and offer the blood to God. Man had no meat to eat until God gave it to him. Many are seeking to do away with capital punishment; but what do they care about God? The whole order of God is broken up now. Even a beast that kills should die.
The wording reaches down to the closest human relationships. Cain's question — was he his brother's keeper — is answered here.
Above all, man's life is sacred. What Cain did is to go unpunished no longer. Man is plainly declared to be his "brother's keeper": he is to require blood for blood, and to do it as the instrument and deputy of God on earth.
That raises a question from the earlier chapters. Why did the first murderer go free?
No government had yet been set up on the earth, so God would allow no one to punish Cain. Once government began in its simplest form, men were to act, as we see in verses 5 and 6 of Genesis 9.
God foresaw that this authority would be abused. Writers read His demand here as a guard set against that abuse.
Man would soon misuse and twist the very governing authority God placed in his hand, following his own will without the fear of God. Rivers of blood would flow — not only through lawless corruption and violence, as before the flood, but through ambitious kings and rulers after it. So God, in His foreseeing wisdom and thoughtful goodness, declares at the very start of the new order, "And for your lifeblood I will require a reckoning: from every beast I will require it."
Commentators see this word as the starting point of all lawful government.
The words of Genesis 9:5-6 — "Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in His own image" — first laid the primary basis of human government as it is. Life belonged to God, and He passed that principle on to Noah. From then on man was responsible as God's servant to carry out wrath, even to the shedding of blood if blood had been shed; for he must not carry the sword for nothing.
This demand also set a law in place. Writers note how long that law has stood.
Life is what lets a created being enjoy the place the Creator has set it in. Sin has come in, so that life is forfeited, and God claims it in the words of Genesis 9:5. That established capital punishment for murder, and the law has never been cancelled or changed.
- Claim — Life is God's. He reserved the blood for Himself and treats every human death as a debt owed to Him.
- Reach — The claim runs to the beast, to man, and to a man's own brother; no killer is outside God's reckoning.
- Contrast — Cain went free because no government existed yet. Here God puts the sword in man's hand for the first time.
- Restraint — The same word that arms rulers also warns them. God knew authority would be twisted, and rivers of blood would follow.
- Permanence — This word established capital punishment for murder, and writers say that law has never been cancelled or changed.
Whoso sheddeth Man's blood, by Man shall his blood be shed; for in the image of God he hath made Man.
After the flood, Noah steps out of the ark into a fresh start. God lays down one rule to guard human life: whoever takes a life forfeits his own. Two questions follow. Where does a government get the right to put a killer to death, and what makes killing a person an offence against God Himself?
Government is not as old as the human race. It began at a fixed point in history.
Notice that nothing like civil government was set up at the beginning. Man did not invent it in all the centuries before the flood. God established it for the first time after that great event... This is why Cain was not punished by man, as responsibility would have required after the sword was committed to Noah. From then on God solemnly required blood for blood.
This rule does more than punish a killer. It also says what a human life is worth.
God attached a value to man's life that He had never declared before. It counted for more still, because now for the first time it fell to government, responsible to God, to defend that life.
The verse does not argue from what society needs. It argues from what man is.
The image of God expresses man's place and responsibility of representing God... It is not His likeness, for man lost this by sin and fathered children in his own likeness. But man keeps His image, even fallen as he is here. So the man who kills another (except by proper authority) is guilty of denying God's right in this respect... The murderer does not just interfere with a man and harm him as badly as possible. He also defaces God's image by killing a man, and God sentences the murderer to die.
The verse uses only one of those two words, and the difference matters.
What is insisted on here is the image, not the likeness. So Genesis 9:6. But in James 3:9 it is "likeness," not "image."... An image "represents"; a likeness is "conformed to."
God handed this right down. It did not grow up from below, so no theory about how societies form can explain it — or cancel it.
Clearly it is God's committal of the sword, the power of life and death, into the hands of man... Such is the true source and basis of civil government. It did not spring from a social contract. It did not grow by degrees out of family relationships. It did not begin in the usurpation of man or of a class. As God's command gave it being, so it can never cease to be clothed with His authority, whether men listen or refuse... It is a right of God, which He has been pleased ever since the flood to entrust to human keeping.
This command targets murder, not accidental death. And it puts the sword in official hands.
The law separated murder from manslaughter. If someone killed a person by accident, that killer could run to a City of Refuge and be protected there. God has given man governmental authority to carry out this universal command. It came long before the law of Moses, and no one has ever repealed or relaxed it. In the New Testament the magistrate does not bear the sword in vain, for he is God's servant for the punishment of evildoers. Romans 13.
One writer takes this verse straight into today's argument over the death penalty.
God had already spoken long before on this case (Genesis 9); no one has revoked it, and no one can... That ground remains, and so does the guilt on a land that does not avenge such blood. Those who today would abolish the death penalty should weigh it: "no atonement can be made for the land for the blood that is shed in it, except by the blood of the one who shed it."
The same chapter that hands man the sword also shows him drunk. That failure is part of the lesson.
Man fails with government as well as without it — not only the governed, but the governor. Noah — that is, man — proves completely unable to wield the sword in righteousness before God, because whoever governs must first know how to rule himself. But Noah got drunk... Part of God's purpose is to show this, and so to show that the Man of His right hand must come to rule the earth.
- Given — Government starts here, not in Eden. No human court punished Cain, because God had not yet handed man the sword.
- Grounded — The reason is the image of God. Man represents God, so killing a man defaces God's image and denies His right.
- Guarded — The authority is God's, only lent to man. No social contract made it, and no vote can cancel what no man granted.
- Governed — The sword belongs to the magistrate, and it answers murder, not accidental death.
- Given up — The first man trusted with the sword got drunk. Every failed ruler since points to the Man who must come to rule in righteousness.
And ye, be fruitful and multiply swarm on the earth, and multiply on it.
God speaks these words to Noah and his sons on the far side of the flood, in a world just emptied of its inhabitants. God gave the same charge in verse 1. Here it returns — but only after He has spoken about bloodshed. Why repeat a blessing on human increase at that point?
One writer points to what God already knew about the race when He said it.
Despite all He foresaw of rebellion and bloodshed, God repeats in Genesis 9:7 His word to men: "Be fruitful and multiply, increase greatly on the earth and multiply in it." They have certainly done this.
But a fuller earth also means more sinners. One writer answers that objection.
God repeats the encouragement of verse 1 to multiply on the earth, and verse 7 puts even more emphasis on it. Multiplying would bring more sinners into the world, but that would not defeat God: by His own pure grace He is able to save sinners. People today try every method of keeping the population of the world down, but God has not told them to do this. He knows how to take care of this problem and will do so in His own way.
The command is not simply to have children. It fixes where those children are to end up.
Notice, God's command to man, as he entered the restored earth, was to refill that earth; not parts of the earth, but the earth. He wanted men spread out across the face of the world, not leaning on their own concentrated strength. We shall see, in Genesis 11, how man neglected all this.
The wording echoes God's words to Adam, but the setting has changed. What man holds now is not what he held in Eden.
Back then God gave dominion to man made in His image, after His likeness — dominion over the fish of the sea, the birds of the heavens, the cattle, all the earth, and every creeping thing that creeps on the earth. Now it was a fallen world. God blessed these men and charged them to fill the earth, and the fear and the dread of them were to fall on every beast and bird, with reptile and fish. He delivered the creatures into men's hand. Sin was everywhere, and God took it into account as an existing fact that could not be ignored.
The verses just before this one hand man something new. Writers tie it to the failure that brought the flood.
The Lord's instructions to Noah in verses 3-6 show the start of human government on earth. After Adam sinned, God left man to his conscience. Man broke down completely, and the flood came. So man needed more than conscience, and at this point a new order began: human government. It was necessary to restrain evil and keep order. God, however, gives man only a minimum of law for government — just two laws, covering the rights of God and the rights of mankind.
That trust did not last long in Noah's own hands.
God entrusted government to the hands of men. Sadly, this new trial soon has the same result as before. The government given to Noah loses its honour at once. The earth, relieved by farming care, becomes in its fruit a snare to Noah. He gets drunk, and his own son dishonours him.
Two chapters later, men do the opposite of what this verse commands. They gather instead of spreading.
They were to fill the earth. But scattered in peaceful quietness they would count for nothing, so they would not. They had to get a name for themselves, to be a centre. And God scatters into nations by judgment what would not fill the earth by families in peace.
- Repeated — God gives the charge twice in this chapter. The second time carries more emphasis, and it follows His words about bloodshed. He knew what the race would do and blessed it anyway.
- Answered — More people would mean more sinners. That does not defeat God. By His own grace He is able to save sinners, and He never tells man to hold the numbers down.
- Spread — The target is the whole earth, not parts of it. God wanted men dispersed, not leaning on their own concentrated strength.
- Guarded — A filling earth needed restraint. So God put government in man's hand with only two basic laws: the rights of God and the rights of man. Conscience alone had already collapsed into the flood.
- Enforced — At Babel men refused to scatter and built for a name instead. God then scattered them by judgment. His word in this verse stood either way.
And God spoke to Noah, and to his sons with him, saying,
The flood waters had gone. The earth was fresh again. Then God spoke — not to Noah alone, but to Noah and his sons standing with him. What follows is the first covenant the Bible sets out in full. Why does God bind Himself by promise to a race He has just judged?
The word "covenant" had been used before the flood as a pledge to Noah. Here it is opened out in full.
"I will establish my covenant with you" had been God's word to Noah, before he built the ark or the waters came (Gen. 6:18). Now that the judgment is past, and the new earth is inherited, God details that covenant in full and pledges it again to His elect (Gen. 9:8-17). Every covenant we read of in Scripture is specific. Each one names its parties and states its objects plainly. There is no mistaking them.
God speaks to Noah and his sons with him. From there the circle widens further than in any other covenant.
Genesis 9:1-7 set out the blessing of God pronounced on Noah and his sons for the world that now is. From then on God allowed man to eat animal food, yet forbade him to eat blood, which belongs to God. God also put government into man's hand for the first time. Its task was to protect human life, and to vindicate God where life was taken. Now Genesis 9:8-11 give the covenant God established with mankind and every creature set under man. It is the largest covenant God ever made. It still holds under a merciful pledge that cannot fail.
Notice the direction of the speech. God speaks; Noah and his sons are not asked to agree to terms.
This covenant made with Noah and all creation was unconditional. It was a covenant of promise, not depending on any faithfulness of the creature. It was something new.
The same is said of God's covenants generally, and it sets them apart from the bargains people make with each other.
The covenants made by God are of a different order. He makes His covenants from Himself, without consulting man. With Noah God made a covenant that He would not again destroy the world by a flood. As a token of that covenant He set the rainbow in the cloud (Gen. 9:8-17). This kind of covenant takes the form of an unconditional promise.
The verse names the speaker simply as God. One writer explains why no other title would fit here.
Here we may observe that it is "God" (Elohim) who blessed and who spoke; no other title would be fitting. "The LORD" (Jehovah) would have been entirely out of place. This is not an occasion for expressing a special relationship. The subject before us is of the widest character. It is the Creator who is declaring Himself the Preserver of all here below. He does so despite the imagination of man's heart being evil from his youth, which had so recently ended in the destruction of everyone on earth outside the ark. God could and would and did bless on the ground of sacrifice. That blessing was provisional, until the infinite sacrifice by which the new heavens and new earth will come in. Here God establishes His covenant with Noah and his sons on a footing that leaves aside all question of the soul or of moral considerations.
Before God spoke these words, Noah had built an altar. The order matters.
His first act on the cleansed earth was to build an altar to the LORD. There he offered burnt offerings of all the clean animals and birds. The LORD smelled a pleasing aroma. He said in His heart that He would not again curse the ground because of man. He would not again strike down every living thing as He had done. This teaches us that God carries on His providential government of the world on the ground of the pleasing aroma of Christ's sacrifice.
A family that had just watched the world drown had every reason to expect it to happen again. God speaks to that fear.
God covenants not only with Noah and his sons and with his descendants after them, but with every living creature — cattle, bird, and beast. Without such a covenant, what could guilty man expect but repeated strokes of the same judgment which had just taken them all away? Would not old sins renewed and fresh sins added provoke the same punishment? No; God's covenant with man and the earth steps in absolutely. "I have sworn that the waters of Noah should no more go over the earth." He will surely judge and destroy in another way, as He warns elsewhere. But it was no small comfort, when the world that now is began after the flood, that God settled their trembling hearts against a blow they naturally and rightly dreaded.
- Spoken, not negotiated — God "makes His covenants from Himself, without consulting man." Noah and his sons receive a promise, not a contract.
- Built on sacrifice — the altar came first. God's ongoing care of the world rests on the pleasing aroma of Christ's sacrifice.
- Widest reach — the promise covers Noah, his sons, their descendants and every living creature. It is "the largest covenant God ever made."
- Fear removed — the survivors could expect the flood to return. God's covenant rules that out, though He warns of judgment of another kind.
- Still standing — it is an unconditional promise, so it holds "under a merciful pledge that cannot fail."
And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed after you;
Noah has just stepped out of the ark onto an emptied earth, and God speaks first — binding Himself by promise to Noah, to his descendants, and to every creature that came out with him. The rest of the chapter answers what this promise is, who is inside it, and what holds it up.
The word translated "covenant" appears here for the first time in the Bible, and its use is never vague. God had already told Noah He would establish it before the flood came; now He spells it out.
"With you I will establish my covenant" had been God's word to Noah, before the ark was made, or the waters had come. Genesis 6:18. Now the judgment is past and the new earth is inherited. So God spells that covenant out in full, and pledges it again, to His chosen. Genesis 9:8-17. And it is here that the word "covenant" is first used. Every covenant we read about in Scripture is specific. Its parties and its purposes are clearly defined and plainly stated. There is no mistaking them.
God does the establishing. He asks nothing from Noah in return, and nothing in the arrangement waits on how Noah's descendants behave.
This covenant made with Noah and all creation was unconditional. It was a covenant of promise, not depending on any faithfulness of the creature. It was something new.
Before the flood God spoke to Noah alone. Here He speaks to the sons as well, and one writer traces the change back to the sacrifices on the altar.
God had talked with Noah, because he was righteous before Him. He had often spoken to Noah, but never before to his sons. The Lord could not do this before the flood, or even before Noah and his family left the ark. Once the sacrifices were offered on the altar, He could and did do it... To the righteous one God could speak apart from a sacrifice; to others only on the ground of it. Noah had a place before Him on earth because of what he was; his sons only because of the sacrifice.
The covenant reaches past Noah's family to every creature under man, and it still stands.
Genesis 9:1-7 set out the blessing of God pronounced on Noah and his sons for the world that now is... Now Genesis 9:8-11 give the covenant God established with mankind and with every creature placed under man. It is the largest covenant God ever made, and it still stands under a merciful pledge that cannot fail.
Scripture uses more than one name for God. One writer explains which name stands behind the word "God" here, and why the other name would not fit.
Notice again that it is "Elohim" Who blessed (Genesis 9:1) and spoke (verse 8). No other title would be fitting here. "Jehovah" would have been entirely out of place. This is no occasion for expressing a special relationship. Far from it: what is before us here is as wide as it could be. It is the Creator declaring Himself the Preserver of everything here below. And He does so even though the thoughts of man's heart are evil from his youth — which had so recently ended in the destruction of everyone on earth outside the ark.
"Your offspring after you" is not a closed list. Everyone alive descends from Noah, so everyone alive stands under its terms.
The second head in this second world — the world since the flood — was Noah. But his place stood on changed terms: under a covenanted and unconditional blessing, whose full token was the rainbow God set in the cloud. Under the protection of that blessing we take our part as "his seed" and descendants. This unchanging covenant rests on the faithfulness of God. It is what secures all blessing to every living creature.
Some treat this as the first of the Bible's covenants. Others argue that, in the strict sense, Scripture has only two.
There are really only two covenants in Scripture — the old covenant and the new. Still, the word covenant is used in several places about the Lord where it only announces certain relationships. These are relationships He was pleased to enter into with man or with the creature (Genesis 9:8-17, and so on), or on which man was to approach Him — but without conditions. The context must decide the sense.
- Sacrifice first. God spoke to Noah's sons only after the sacrifice. The whole covenant stands on ground that sacrifice prepared.
- Gift, not deal. It is unconditional — a promise, resting on nothing the creature contributes.
- Widest reach. It takes in Noah, his descendants, and every living creature: the largest covenant God ever made.
- Creator's word. The speaker is God the Creator, declaring Himself the Preserver of all — not entering a special relationship with one people.
- Still standing. It rests on God's faithfulness, so it cannot fail. Every living thing shelters under it today.
and with every living soul which is with you, fowl as well as cattle, and all the animals of the earth with you, of all that has gone out of the ark -- every animal of the earth.
God's covenant after the flood is not made with Noah alone. The list of partners widens to take in the birds, the cattle and the wild animals that left the ark. Why does God name animals in a covenant at all? And what does that tell us about Him?
The reach of this promise marks it out. One writer gives both the size of this covenant and how long it lasts:
Genesis 9:8-11 give the covenant God established with mankind and with every creature set under man. It is the largest covenant God ever made. It still stands, held up by a merciful pledge that cannot fail.
The words "as many as came out of the ark" also draw a line around who is covered. One commentator points out what that line leaves out:
At this time God also announced a covenant with Noah and his sons. It included all his descendants too, as well as the birds and animals — all who had been in the ark, and therefore not the fish. The covenant was that God would not again send a flood to destroy the earth.
The name used for God here is not accidental. The promise reaches birds, cattle and the whole earth. So the fitting name is "Elohim" — God as Maker of everything — rather than "Jehovah," the name of a special relationship:
Here again we may notice that it is "Elohim" Who blessed (Gen. 9:1) and spoke (v. 8). No other name would fit. "Jehovah" would have been completely out of place. This is not an occasion for expressing a special relationship. What is before us is as wide as it could be. It is the Creator declaring Himself the Preserver of all here below.
This covenant does not stand on its own. One writer traces its whole reach — animals included — back to a sacrifice:
Because of the sacrifice, God established His covenant with Noah, his sons, their descendants after them, and every living thing that was with them — birds, cattle, beasts of the earth, all that came out of the ark. So the earth and everything tied to it shared in the benefits of the sacrifice. As far as the consequences of man's sin had reached on earth, just as far the blessed results of the burnt offering would be felt.
God asks nothing in return:
This covenant made with Noah and all creation was unconditional. It was a covenant of promise, not depending on any faithfulness of the creature.
Survivors of a flood have every reason to fear a second one. This covenant speaks straight to that fear:
Without such a covenant, what could guilty man expect but repeated blows of the same judgment that had just swept them all away? Would old sins repeated and new sins added not bring the same punishment? No. God's covenant with man and the earth stands in the way, and stands absolutely... He will judge and destroy in other ways, as He warns elsewhere. But it was no small comfort, when the present world began after the flood, that God calmed their trembling hearts about a blow they had every natural and just reason to dread.
The animals came through the water, and then into the covenant. One writer sees in that an early pledge of something larger:
We have had many pledges of this final redemption and joy of the creatures. Noah carried them, two of every kind, with himself and his household through the waters into the new world. And the same covenant that settled him and his descendants there provided just as much for them (Gen. 9:10).
That care for creatures runs through the whole Bible and ends in their release:
God never forgets His rights as Creator and Preserver. Even when our blessed Lord brought out heavenly and eternal things, He never taught us to despise the birds of the sky or the lilies of the field, or God's care in either case... And the New Testament is as clear as the Old in keeping before us the deliverance He will surely bring for the whole creation, which groans and suffers pain together until now.
- Sacrifice first. The covenant rests on a burnt offering. Its blessing reaches as far as sin's damage had reached.
- Gift, not bargain. It is a covenant of promise. It does not depend on any faithfulness of the creature.
- Widest reach. God names the birds, cattle and beasts that left the ark as partners. Commentators call it the largest covenant He ever made.
- Creator's name. God speaks here as "Elohim" — Creator and Preserver of all below. This is not the name of a special relationship.
- Result: rest. God calmed trembling hearts about a second flood. By including the creatures, He pledged the deliverance creation still groans for.
And I establish my covenant with you, neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood, and henceforth there shall be no flood to destroy the earth.
After the flood, God speaks not to warn but to bind Himself: never again will water wipe out all flesh. Commentators ask what He promised, what it rests on, how far it reaches, and what it leaves out.
A survivor's natural thought is that the same blow could fall again. One writer sets the promise against that fear:
God establishes His covenant in a way that cuts off the least fear from every heart that trusted in Him. There is no more fear that a flood will destroy all flesh, and no fear that God will ever deal with the earth in that way again. Without such a covenant, what could guilty man expect but repeated strokes of the same judgment which had just taken them all away? Would not old sins renewed and fresh sins added provoke like punishment? Not so. God's covenant with man and the earth steps in and settles the matter.
Noah offered a sacrifice, and the promise followed. One writer draws out what that sacrifice means for the whole earth:
Noah's was the second recorded sacrifice, Abel's being the first. Abel's sacrifice shows the ground the believing individual stands on with God. Noah's shows the ground the earth stands on with God. Christ's atonement is the reason God can bear with the appalling mass of evil that meets His eye as He looks down from above. Patience would be impossible without the atoning sacrifice, which is always before the mind of God. So the unbeliever owes the very air he breathes to the Saviour whose name he scorns.
God asks nothing of Noah in return. One writer names what kind of agreement this is:
This covenant made with Noah and all creation was unconditional. It was a covenant of promise, not depending on any faithfulness of the creature. It was something new.
Another writer traces the covenant back to the sacrifice behind it:
The sacrifice of Christ (pictured here) becomes a ground for God's dealing with the earth, not only for accepting man, as with Abel. On this a covenant is founded. God binds Himself in grace, so faith has sure ground to stand on, something it can count on.
The parties named in this covenant go well beyond Noah's family. One writer measures it against every other covenant in Scripture:
Genesis 9:1-7 set out the blessing of God pronounced on Noah and his sons for the world that now is. Now Genesis 9:8-11 give the covenant God established with mankind and every creature set under man. It is the largest covenant God ever made, and it still continues under a merciful pledge that cannot fail. We first hear of a covenant with Noah in Genesis 6:18.
Another writer notes the strange use people make of a promise God has kept:
The covenant was to the effect that God would not again send a flood to destroy the earth (vv. 10-11). Once a flood like this had happened, people would fear another. But God's word on this is absolute. Sadly, because another has not come, people deny that the first ever happened! Such is the perversity of human sinful nature!
God rules out one kind of judgment, not every kind. Another still stands, and with it a way of escape:
God has told us that just as that world was destroyed by water so this world will be destroyed by fire. The same word of God says this world is kept for the fire at the day of judgment and ruin of bad men. (See 2 Peter 3:7.) He warns men, and tells them how they may escape. (John 3:16.)
- Pledge given. God removes from every trusting heart the least fear of another flood destroying all flesh. His covenant settles it.
- Pledge grounded. Abel's sacrifice shows the ground the believer stands on. Noah's shows the ground the earth stands on. The world keeps going because of Christ's atonement.
- Pledge unconditional. This is a covenant of promise. It does not depend on the faithfulness of the creature. God binds Himself in grace, so faith has something it can count on.
- Pledge wide. God made it with mankind and every creature under man. It is the largest covenant He ever made, and it still stands.
- Pledge limited. God ruled out water, not judgment. This world is kept for fire, and God warns men how to escape.
And God said, This is the sign of the covenant that I set between me and you and every living soul that is with you, for everlasting generations
God has just brought Noah's family out of the ark into a world washed by judgment. Now He speaks a promise, not a command, and He gives that promise a visible sign. Notice who the promise covers: not Noah alone, but every living creature, and not one lifetime, but all generations to come.
The verse sits at a hinge in the chapter. The opening verses gave Noah a new order for life on earth, and then God turned from ruling to pledging.
In Genesis 9:8-11 God establishes His covenant with mankind and with every creature set under man. It is the largest covenant God ever made, and it still stands on a merciful pledge that cannot fail. Neither of these applied to the world before the flood. In the verses that follow (12-17) God kindly gives a sign or token of His covenant with the earth. Of a covenant with Noah we first hear in Genesis 6:18.
Noah had offered a burnt offering. God's pledge follows on that.
God makes a covenant with Noah and with the creation, and as the witness of it He gives the rainbow… God gave this covenant to the earth right after the sacrifice of Noah, which is a picture of the sacrifice of Christ.
The verse sets no terms for Noah to keep. God says what He will do.
This covenant made with Noah and all creation was unconditional. It was a covenant of promise, not depending on any faithfulness of the creature. It was something new. The wording of God's promise clearly implies that mankind had never seen a rainbow before.
A sign answers a fear. Survivors of a flood have every reason to dread the next dark sky. The sign God chose meets that dread: it cannot appear without the very cloud that frightens them.
So the goodness of God pledged in the bow He set in the cloud brings immense comfort. As a rule you do not see the bow unless there is rain. You see it only when the sun shines bright at your back from the opposite quarter of the sky. So no sign could be more fitting. The rain might awaken fears; the glorious bow was fitted to calm them. This was God's own way of assuring man of His unfailing covenant.
Commentators differ on whether the rainbow itself was new. Hole reads the wording as proof that no one had seen one before. The Bible Treasury holds that Scripture leaves the question open, and that God may have taken a familiar sight and given it a new and merciful meaning.
God sets the sign in the sky, above human reach. The following verses say He will look at it and remember.
The Lord God makes a covenant with Noah and with all the creatures around him. He will keep the earth safe from a second flood. As a token of this, He hangs the bow in the cloud, up there under His own eye, that He may look on it, and so remember His promise… The cloud might threaten, and swell itself with water; the bow should control it. The cloud might frown; the bow should smile… And God set the creation on sure conditions, not on conditions that could fail.
The verse names animals alongside people. That reach traces back to the altar Noah built.
Because of the sacrifice, God established His covenant with Noah, his sons, their descendants after them, and every living thing that was with them… The earth and all connected with it shared in the benefits of the sacrifice. As far as the consequences of man's sin had reached on earth, so far the blessed results of the burnt offering would be felt… The earth as well as man had a share in the covenant, and the creature will one day rejoice in the liberty of the glory of the sons of God.
The rainbow does not stay in Genesis.
The bow God set in the cloud long ago, with its many colours and varied beauty, is the token of His covenant with the earth (Gen. 9:9-17)… It is God's object lesson for the human race. It is a public sign hung out in the heavens, so that all may see and learn that God is good. The last mention of the rainbow shows it over the head of the Lord as He claims the earth in power (Rev. 10:1).
- Cause. The covenant follows Noah's burnt offering, a picture of the sacrifice of Christ. The earth's blessing rests on that sacrifice.
- Gift. God adds a sign to His word: not a duty for man, but a promise of God that depends on no faithfulness of the creature.
- Fitness. The bow only appears with the cloud, so the very thing that stirs fear now carries the assurance that calms it.
- Reach. The pledge covers Noah, his descendants, and every living creature. It is the widest covenant God has made, and it still stands.
- Result. God set the bow where He Himself looks at it. It appears again in Revelation, over the One who claims the earth.
I set my bow in the clouds, and it shall be for a sign of the covenant between me and the earth.
The flood is over, and God gives a promise, not a warning — tied to something Noah could see in the sky whenever rain returned. Three questions follow: what did God "set" there, who is the sign for, and how far does the covenant reach?
The wording puts the act on God's side. He does not just point out something in nature. He gives it a meaning it did not carry before.
The bow is given as the token of the covenant; that does not mean it was created then. God could, of course, have put plenty of clouds above the earth without a rainbow. He says, "I do set my bow."
J. N. Darby (older translations read "I do set my bow in the cloud")
Commentators differ on whether the rainbow itself was new. One writer treats the question as unanswerable and points to the new meaning instead:
It is a pointless question, because Scripture has not given us enough evidence to settle it. Was the rainbow seen then for the first time, or was it well known in the earliest ages?... The least we can draw from the words is that God was now, after the flood, pleased to attach a new and merciful meaning to it.
The sign meets the moment when fear returns — when the sky darkens again.
So there is immense comfort in the bow God's goodness pledged when He set it in the cloud. As a rule you do not see it unless there is rain, and only when the sun shines behind you from the opposite side of the sky. No sign could fit better. If the rain might stir up fear, the beautiful bow had every right to calm it, because God Himself was pleased to assure man of His unfailing covenant.
Another writer holds the two halves together — the cloud God brings, and the bow God sets:
"I bring a cloud... I do set My bow." We may not separate these two, nor look at one apart from the other. It is good for us to remember that man — himself and his works — is only fit for judgment. It is just as good to remember what God is, or the soul must sink into despair.
The sign is not only for human eyes.
The bow in the cloud is man's assurance; but it is more, it is God's memorial of the new relationship into which He has entered with His creatures. His eye is on the bow, and not man's only. So He gives them fellowship with Himself in a sign that speaks of peace in the middle of trouble, and of light in the place of darkness.
The covenant this sign confirms carries no conditions for Noah to keep. This writer also takes the wording as proof that the rainbow itself was new:
This covenant made with Noah and all creation was unconditional. It was a covenant of promise, not depending on any faithfulness of the creature. It was something new. The words, "I do set My bow in the cloud," clearly imply that no one had ever seen a rainbow before.
The promise rules out one kind of judgment, not every judgment:
Another universal judgment by water will never come again (verse 15). Another judgment is in store for this planet. "The world that then existed was deluged with water and perished. But by the same word the heavens and earth that now exist are stored up for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly."
The colours themselves carry meaning.
This is a lovely picture of God's glory, for "God is light." Each colour stands for some part of God's many attributes — supremacy, power, authority, grace, righteousness, holiness, love... So all the glory of God is bound up in His promise never again to judge the world by a universal flood.
That same pattern — glory shining out of a storm — appears again at the cross:
There was a cloud indeed — a dark, thick, heavy cloud of judgment pouring itself out on the sacred head of the Lamb of God... But, thank God, faith sees in that heaviest cloud that ever gathered the most brilliant and beautiful bow that ever appeared.
- Set, not found. God takes the bow and makes it His token. The covenant rests on His act of giving the sign, not on where the rainbow came from.
- Cloud, then bow. The sign appears only where there is cloud. God joins the reminder of judgment to the reminder of what He is, so fear does not turn into despair.
- His eye first. The bow is man's assurance, but it is also God's memorial. His own eye is on it, and that is why the promise holds.
- No conditions, wide reach. God makes the covenant with Noah, all creation, and the earth itself, and it depends on no faithfulness from the creature.
- Glory out of the storm. Colour after judgment pictures God showing His own glory — and faith sees that glory most clearly at the cross.
And it shall come to pass when I bring clouds over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud,
The bow set in the cloud is God's answer to a world that had just watched water swallow everything. So why did God tie the sign to the very thing people would fear most — the gathering cloud?
The promise attached to this sign asks nothing of Noah in return.
This covenant made with Noah and all creation was unconditional. It was a covenant of promise, not depending on any faithfulness of the creature. It was something new. The words, "I do set My bow in the cloud," clearly suggest that no one had ever seen a rainbow before.
Commentators differ on whether the rainbow itself was new. Others read the verb as appointment rather than creation:
The rainbow may have appeared to Noah before, but it was not appointed by God as a token until after the flood. The word translated "set" (nathan) is sometimes translated "appoint," as in Joshua 20:2. Others think it more likely that no one saw a rainbow before the flood, since the air was in a different state then from what it became after the flood.
The survivors of the flood had a reason to dread bad weather.
Men had good reason to tremble after that terrible disaster. Dark clouds covered the sky, the rain fell in torrents, and tidal waves rose with overwhelming force. An accusing conscience would speak even louder of the disaster they had just lived through. Man naturally expects that what happened once will happen again. He expects it all the more if old sins still ruled and new evils sprang up.
Notice that the verse names the cloud, not the rain — and that detail is exact.
As a rule you do not see it unless there is rain. And you see it only when the sun shines brightly at your back, from the opposite side of the sky. So no sign could be more fitting. If the rain might stir up fears, the glorious bow had every right to calm them. God Himself gladly chose this way to assure man of His unfailing covenant. The accuracy is even more striking. The words run, "When I bring clouds over the earth and the bow is seen in the clouds." Rain does not seem strictly necessary, but cloud is.
The verse says the bow will be seen. Scripture then adds that God Himself looks at it.
We look at the cloud; God looks at the bow. What grace is here! He says, "And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it." The bow tells of God's unchangeable faithfulness and mercy when all is over with man. This is the ground we are on with God.
Cloud and bow appear together again in a scene of coming judgment.
The mighty angel, the angel of judgment, comes down. He is clothed with a cloud, the frightening vessel of wrath and sign of judgment. This is what God said at the beginning: "When I bring clouds over the earth." But even then the rainbow is with Him... It is not simply with a cloud He comes down, but with the cloud and the bow accompanying it. See Gen. 9:14; Rev. 10:1. This tells us that at the very end He remembers His word, and will hold judgment in check. He will say to it, "You may come this far, and no farther." ... The cloud carries out its commission and pours out its waters, or its judgments, again. But it must stop in obedience to the bow that measures and controls it.
Since God brings the cloud, the sign is meant for your own trouble too.
My fellow-believer, in all the trials of the way God would have us see the bow in the cloud. Think of this in your present trial, which He has allowed. Think of the thing that distresses you most of all, which perhaps no other Christian knows anything about. These words are written for you... The cloud may be dark and gloomy, but there is a beauty in it painted by His own hand, and it tells you, despite everything, what He is to you. And remember, whether you see it or not, IT IS THERE.
- Cloud. God fixed the sign to the very thing men feared after the flood: a sky filling with water again.
- Bow. He gives it as an unconditional promise. It rests on His faithfulness, not on anything Noah does.
- Seen. The bow appears only with cloud and with sunlight behind you. No sign could match the words of the verse better.
- Looked upon. Man watches the cloud; God watches the bow, and it is His eye on it that keeps the promise alive.
- Held back. Right to the last judgments, the cloud must stop where the bow says stop — so read your own dark sky the same way.
and I will remember my covenant which is between me and you and every living soul of all flesh; and the waters shall not henceforth become a flood to destroy all flesh.
The words of this verse are God's own reason for hanging a bow in the sky: when clouds gather over the earth, He binds Himself to remember what He has promised. Two things stand out. The promise reaches beyond Noah to every living creature. And God is the one who remembers, not man.
The flood had shown what God could do. Would He do it again? This covenant settles the question.
God sets up His covenant to cut off the least fear from every heart that trusted Him. No flood will destroy all flesh again, and God will not deal with the earth in any such way. Without such a covenant, what could guilty man expect but repeated strokes of the same judgment that had just swept them all away? Would not old sins renewed and fresh sins added provoke the same punishment? Not so; God's covenant with man and the earth steps in absolutely.
The verse ties the promise to the moment clouds appear. That is the very moment a flood survivor would fear most. The wording is also precise about what the bow needs.
This is the immense comfort God's goodness pledged in the bow He set in the cloud. As a rule you do not see it unless there is rain. And you only see it when the sun shines at your back from the opposite quarter of the sky. No sign could be more fitting. If the rain might wake fears, the glorious bow was there to calm them; for God Himself in this way assured man of His unfailing covenant. The accuracy is all the more striking. The terms run, "When I bring clouds over the earth and the bow is seen in the clouds, I will remember my covenant." So "rain" does not seem strictly necessary, but "cloud" is.
The bow is not only for human eyes. God sets it where He Himself will see it, and He says the remembering is His.
The Lord God makes a covenant with Noah, and with all the creatures around him, that He will keep the earth safe from a second flood. As a sign of this, He hangs the bow in the cloud, up there under His own eye, so that He may look on it and so remember His promise. The cloud might threaten and swell with water; the bow would control it. The cloud might frown; the bow would smile.
The promise names every living creature of all flesh. One writer traces that reach back to the sacrifice Noah had just offered.
Because of the sacrifice, God established His covenant with Noah, his sons, and their seed after them. He included every living thing that was with them — birds, cattle, beasts of the earth, everything that came out of the ark. The earth and all connected with it shared in the benefits of the sacrifice. As far as the consequences of man's sin had reached on earth, there the blessed results of the burnt offering would be felt... The covenant took in the earth as well as man, as the creation will one day rejoice in the liberty of the glory of the sons of God.
The pledge is specific: never again by water. That precision matters, because Scripture speaks of a judgment still ahead.
The rainbow speaks of a judgment now past, of His salvation and His remembrance. Another universal judgment by water will never come again (verse 15). But another judgment is in store for this planet. "The world that then existed was deluged with water and perished. But by the same word the heavens and earth that now exist are stored up for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and destruction of the ungodly" (2 Pet. 3:6-7).
The same sign appears again in Scripture. Its meaning holds even when judgment falls.
The rainbow was the seal of God's covenant with the earth, an agreement in which He pledged Himself never again to visit the earth with a flood. So the rainbow appears as a complete circle around the throne, alongside all the judgments about to come from that throne upon the earth. It is as if to remind us that God would act according to the terms of that covenant. He will never forget the pledge He has given, and all the judgments of the great tribulation will not wipe it out.
- Cause — a flood had happened once, so survivors had every reason to dread the next dark sky. The covenant cuts that fear off.
- Sign — the bow needs cloud to appear at all. So the very thing that threatens frames the promise: the cloud frowns, the bow smiles.
- Memory — God places the sign where He Himself will look at it; the remembering is His work, not our effort to hold Him to His word.
- Reach — the covenant rests on the sacrifice Noah offered. It stretches as wide as sin's damage went: every living creature, and the earth itself.
- Limit — the pledge is against water, not against all judgment. A day of fire is still coming, and the bow around God's throne shows the promise still standing.
And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living soul of all flesh that is upon the earth.
This verse ends God's covenant with Noah on a striking note. God Himself looks at the bow He set in the sky. That raises two questions. Why would God, who forgets nothing, need a reminder? And how far does this covenant reach?
The key words in the verse are God's own "I will remember." One writer draws out whose memory the world now rests on:
The whole creation rests, as to its exemption from a second deluge, on the eternal stability of God's covenant, of which the bow is the token; and it is happy to bear in mind that when the bow appears, the eye of God rests upon it; and man is cast not upon his own imperfect and most uncertain memory, but upon God's. "I," says God, "will remember." How sweet to think of what God will, and what He will not remember! He will remember His own covenant, but He will not remember His people's sins.
The bow never appears alone. It appears in the cloud, and each of the two says something different about God:
If God has swept man away once in the judgment of the flood, then whatever the cloud may be, it declares again what He thinks of the first man. If mercy has shown itself and we are spared, we must still never forget that His estimate of what we are is on record, and that the same cloud bears witness to it again. And the bow in the cloud declares His faithfulness to His promise... We look at the cloud; God looks at the bow. What grace is here! He says, "When the bow is in the clouds, I will see it."
A rainbow needs both rain and sunshine. One writer shows why that makes it such a fitting sign:
So God's goodness pledged immense comfort in the bow He set in the cloud. As a rule the bow only shows when there is rain, and only when the sun shines behind you from the opposite side of the sky. No sign could fit better. If the rain might stir up fear, the glorious bow had every right to calm it; for God Himself stooped to assure man of His unfailing covenant.
The parties named in the verse are God and "every living creature of all flesh" — not one nation, not even only mankind. That breadth is deliberate:
Genesis 9:8-11 give the covenant God established with mankind and every creature set under man: the largest covenant God ever made, and still subsisting under a merciful pledge that cannot fail.
God established this covenant on the ground of a sacrifice. One writer traces how far the benefit of that offering reached:
Because of the sacrifice God established His covenant with Noah, his sons, their descendants after them, and with every living thing that was with them... So the earth and all connected with it shared in the benefits of the sacrifice. As far as the consequences of man's sin had reached on earth, so far the blessed results of the burnt offering would reach... The earth as well as man had a share in the covenant, and one day creation will rejoice in the liberty of the glory of the sons of God.
This covenant belongs to the earth as it now stands. One writer traces how long it lasts:
The bow in the cloud is the sign, or token, of this covenant with creation. Under it the earth has continued to the present time, and it will continue all through the millennial (thousand-year) period. Then Christ will hand the kingdom over to the Father, and the heaven and the earth will pass away. They will give place to the new heaven and the new earth — the everlasting state — in which God will be all in all.
The last book of the Bible shows a rainbow encircling God's throne, and readers of Genesis are meant to recognise it:
Here the rainbow is God's remembrance of His covenant with the earth... God is about to pour out judgments on the earth, and on those who had the responsibility of being His people. But He takes pains to show that, before a single judgment falls, there is mercy in store. Before He touches creation, there is the sign of His covenant with the earth... The rainbow was the witness that God had not let go of His ancient word: He could not forget it.
- Sacrifice first. God set this covenant on the ground of a burnt offering, not on better behaviour from man.
- God's memory. God sets the bow and God looks at it; the safety of the world hangs on His "I will remember," not on ours.
- Widest reach. The covenant takes in every living creature and the earth itself, not just Noah and his family.
- Seen in the storm. The bow only appears with the cloud, so the reminder of mercy comes just when fear does.
- Still standing. The bow reaches even to God's throne, showing mercy before judgment falls, and it holds until this earth gives place to the new.
And God said to Noah, This is the sign of the covenant which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.
God names the sign of the covenant one last time, and He says how far it reaches: not Noah's family alone, but all flesh on the earth. Why tie a promise to something as fleeting as a coloured arch in the sky? And what does that arch say about God?
The verse closes a section that began in verse 8. One writer measures its scale against every other agreement God has made.
Genesis 9:8-11 give the covenant God established with mankind and with every creature set under man. It is the largest covenant God ever made, and it still holds good under a merciful pledge that cannot fail. Neither the one nor the other applied to the earth before the flood. In the verses that follow (12-17) God chooses to give a sign or token of His covenant with the earth.
Notice who does the establishing. Only one side takes on anything here.
This covenant made with Noah and all creation was unconditional. It was a covenant of promise, not depending on any faithfulness of the creature. It was something new. God's words about setting His bow in the cloud clearly imply that mankind had never seen a rainbow before.
Commentators differ on that last point. Another writer says the text cannot settle it, and holds to what the words will certainly bear:
At the very least, the words mean that God was now, since the flood, pleased to attach a new and merciful meaning to it. For men might well tremble after that terrible disaster. Dark clouds had covered the skies, the rain had fallen in torrents, and tidal waves had risen over everything.
A bow needs both storm and sunlight. That is what makes it the right answer to fear.
So God's goodness pledged immense comfort in the bow He set in the cloud. As a rule you do not see it unless there is rain, of course. And you only see it when the sun shines brightly behind you, from the opposite side of the sky. No sign could be more appropriate. If the rain might awaken fears, the glorious bow was fit to calm them. In this way God Himself chose to assure man of His unfailing covenant.
Man sees the bow. But God says He looks at it too, which turns a reassurance into something shared.
Last of all, God ratifies the covenant and gives a token to confirm it. The bow in the cloud is man's assurance. But it is more. It is God's own memorial of the new relationship He has entered into with His creatures. His eye, and not man's only, is upon the bow. So He gives them fellowship with Himself in a sign that speaks of peace in the middle of trouble, and of light in the place of darkness.
The bow is more than a reminder. Its colours carry a message.
Pure white light divides into seven distinct visible colours. They always appear in the same order, and each colour of the spectrum has a beauty of its own. This is a lovely picture of God's glory, for "God is light." Each colour stands for some particular aspect of God's many attributes: supremacy, power, authority, grace, righteousness, holiness, love, and others. So all the glory of God is involved in His promise that He will not again judge the world by means of a universal flood.
The covenant did not lapse when God turned to other work. One writer applies the bow to the present day.
The Lord is now gathering a people for heaven. He is not filling the earth with glory yet, but gathering out a chosen family to have communion with Himself in heaven. Still He is mindful of His promise. He looks on the bow and preserves the earth. He keeps seed-time and harvest, cold and heat, day and night, summer and winter, in their fixed rounds and seasons.
Scripture mentions the bow one last time, and its message has not changed.
The bow set in the cloud long ago, with its many colours and varied beauty, is the token of God's covenant with the earth. It is God's object lesson for the human race, a public sign hung out in the heavens so that all may see and learn that God is good. The last mention of the rainbow shows it over the head of the Lord, when in power He asserts His claim to the earth.
- Largest. Of every covenant in Scripture this one is the widest, made not with a family or a nation but with all flesh on the earth.
- Unconditional. It is a covenant of promise. Nothing in it depends on man's faithfulness, so nothing man does can cancel it.
- Fitted. The sign needs cloud and sunlight together. The sky that once frightened men now reassures them.
- Shared. God says He will look at the bow too, making it His memorial as much as man's, and giving fellowship with Himself.
- Lasting. The seasons still run their rounds because He remembers. The bow appears again over the head of the Lord when He claims the earth.
And the sons of Noah who went out of the ark were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth. And Ham is the father of Canaan.
Genesis 9:18 reads like a simple family note: three men leave the ark, and the world starts again from them. Then comes a line about a grandson not yet born — so why this order of names, and why is Ham singled out as the father of Canaan?
Commentators treat this verse as a hinge. The rescue is over; what follows is the record of the rescued.
Genesis 9:18 — 11:9. The story of the deliverance closes here. Now we come to something very different, in many ways the opposite — the history of the delivered people. That history begins with failure. It ends with confusion — and that confusion comes from the same gracious hand that had just delivered them. It is the humbling lesson of what we are, and we now have to read it in the light of what He is.
The order "Shem, Ham, and Japheth" is not the order of their births. Scripture repeats it as a set formula. Something other than age fixes it.
Ham, we know, is declared to be "the little" one (Gen. 9:24) — usually translated "youngest." Chronology shows that Japheth, not Shem, was the eldest. Shem is put first in the usual formula of "Shem, Ham, and Japheth." That is not due to the order of birth, but to the spiritual purpose which gave Shem that position (Gen. 5:32; 6:10; 7:13; 9:18; 10:1). When the detailed "generations" come, though, Japheth's sons are listed first... Japheth had the honour of being firstborn. Ham is marked by his early rise to political place and natural power. But the honour Godward was kept for Shem, though he is named last.
Everyone alive traces back to this small group. The details of how it happened are beyond us.
Verse 18 gives us the names of Noah's sons — Shem, Ham and Japheth — and then the positive statement that "from these the whole earth was populated."... However obscure some races have been, they have become obscure since Noah's time. We have no clear knowledge of how they were scattered through the world — even into North and South America — but all are the descendants of Noah.
The verse repeats a familiar list and adds something new.
The covenant with man and the creation under him, sealed with its sign of mercy, was settled first. Then attention is drawn again to the three heads of Noah's race, "Shem and Ham, and Japheth," in the same order as before (Gen. 5:32; 6:10; 7:13). Now there is an ominous addition: "and Ham is the father of Canaan." The sad incident that follows comments on it at once, and the solemn prophecy at the end of the chapter says more still. It echoes through the whole Old Testament, and it will only be completed in that kingdom which awaits the Anointed of Jehovah, when all the earth shall be filled with His glory.
For Ham this description is no neutral label. One writer sets it against a title of honour.
In verse 21 a notable mark is set on Eber: his forefather Shem is called, in unusual terms, "father of all the sons of Eber," though Eber came several generations later. The opposite happens with Ham, though perhaps not so strikingly. He had to bear the shame of being called "father of Canaan" (Gen. 9:18). So God calls us to notice two things. One is the man who inherited the curse and became the instrument of the enemy, trying to stop Israel from taking possession of the promised land at the right time. The other is the interest He took in making us look ahead to those who stood in the first line of the heirs of Shem's blessing.
The record of Ham himself is thin, and what there is comes from one incident.
One of Noah's three sons: he was father of Cush, Mizraim, Phut, and Canaan... We know nothing about Ham himself except his disrespectful behaviour when his father was drunk. That behaviour brought down the curse of Noah on Canaan.
Some writers also find meaning in the names themselves.
"Ham" means "black," the unenlightened — or perhaps more exactly the "sun-burnt," scorched and darkened by the very light itself. Light that is not received as light becomes a source of darkness to the soul. And Ham is the father of Canaan — the "trader," as his name means.
- Deliverance ends. The verse opens the history of the delivered people. That history begins with failure and ends with confusion.
- Order. Shem heads every list. Not because he was born first — Japheth was eldest, Ham youngest — but because of the spiritual purpose that gave him the place.
- Reach. These three repopulated the whole earth. However obscure a people may be, all descend from Noah.
- Shadow. The added words "father of Canaan" strike an ominous note. The incident that follows explains them, and they echo through the Old Testament.
- Shame and honour. Ham bears a name of shame. Shem is called father of the sons of Eber, a name of honour. The same device marks one line for the curse and one for the blessing.
These three are the sons of Noah; and from these was [the population of] the whole earth spread abroad.
Genesis 9 has closed the old world with a covenant and a rainbow. Now three names carry the whole future of humanity — and one of them comes with a warning attached.
The verse marks a new start for the human race — but not the same kind of start as Eden.
It is not only that mankind sprang from a single pair created innocent as Adam and Eve were. A fresh start for the race began after the flood which judged the guilty mass. God preserved Noah and his three sons from destruction. From them began the conditions that continue today, and will continue for their descendants until the Son of man comes with the clouds of heaven... This time the race did not start from a single line. We have three heads with their wives — three great families to renew the history of man on earth, with the experience drawn from the world before the flood.
The verse ends with the whole earth spreading out from these three. That was a process, not a single moment — and men resisted it at first.
The last word points to what has been going on ever since... What strikes one more is how slowly it happened after the flood. Whatever moved men to hinder the plan of God, it soon became plain that mankind had settled on one united community. They would not only gather together. They would build a city and a tower with its top reaching to the heavens, and make a name for themselves, so that they would not be scattered over the face of the whole earth. This, we are assured, only brought out God's power and wisdom. He frustrated their empty purpose, and He carried out His will that they should spread over the earth. He judged their self-exalting folly by breaking the bond that held them together.
Every nation traces back to these three men. Only Scripture records where the races came from.
In the Bible there is no more important chapter than Genesis 10 about the way God arranged tongues, families, and nations. Here alone we find the rise of the different races, with their sources. Who else could have told us how and when this division of the earth happened?... Everyone who has studied it agrees, as far as I know, that there are three, and only three, divisions into which the nations branch... Men worth listening to are all convinced that these three grand lines are just as surely from one origin as they are distinct. That there was only one such root is the statement of the Scriptures.
The three great divisions of humanity start with these men.
In Noah's sons we have the heads of the three great divisions of the human race. Their characteristics have developed so differently today that unbelievers dare to deny their common blood (Acts 17:26).
The order of the three names matters, and so does the ground the whole arrangement stands on.
The result of this history is that the world is set out by families. The fashion of this world has blotted out the memory and the sense of this, but not the power. It is rooted in the judgment of God. When the acquired strength of this world grows weak, it will show more and more, as it is at work even now. The fountain heads were three, first named in this order: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Shem's was the family in which God would establish His covenant on earth, and with which He would be in relationship. Ham was hostile to God's family. Last came the Gentile Japheth, though he was the eldest and proudest.
The verse just before this one adds a detail to Ham's name: he is the father of Canaan.
Now there is an ominous addition: "and Ham is the father of Canaan." The sad incident that follows comments on it quickly, and the solemn prophecy that closes the chapter says still more. That word echoes through the whole Old Testament. It will be finished only in that kingdom which awaits the Anointed of Jehovah, when all the earth shall be filled with His glory.
The man given the fresh start fails, and the pattern is familiar.
Noah failed to govern himself by his misuse of God's creature, and gave occasion for such sin in his family that a special curse came in there... It is the sad and familiar story of the first man; as soon as he is put to the test, he breaks down. Nor does the evil stop with himself... But God is not mocked. His moral government fails no more than His grace does. And His grace answers every failure of man with something better out of His goodness and wisdom.
- One root. Every nation alive descends from Noah's three sons. Scripture alone tells us how the earth was divided.
- One dispersal. The spreading was slow. Men fought it at Babel with a city and a tower. God broke their union and scattered them anyway.
- One order. God's judgment set the world out by families: Shem the covenant line, Ham hostile to it, Japheth the eldest and proudest.
- One warning. "Ham is the father of Canaan" comes early. The curse and prophecy that follow echo through the whole Old Testament.
- One hope. The new head fails as the first man did. But God's grace answers every failure with something better, until the earth is filled with His glory.
And Noah began [to be] a husbandman, and planted a vineyard.
Genesis 9 gives Noah a cleansed earth, a covenant, and authority no man had held before. Then the record turns to a vineyard, and to what the head of the new world did with it all.
Everything was in Noah's favour when he stepped onto dry ground. One writer lists what God gave him before the test began.
Noah sits in the new world — gifted and blessed, enriched and honoured, taught too, and appointed as "the power" under God. With all this he is at ease, and knows he is safe, with no evil or enemy present. A new trial of man was going on, under new circumstances. As with Adam in Eden, God leaves nothing undone on His part... And Noah, like the rest, fails. The very first foot that trod the fresh soil of the new world quickly stained it.
Farming is an honest calling. Commentators notice which crop Noah chose, and what came of it.
We may note, in passing, that Noah failed in this covenant, as man always has. Instead of drawing blessings out of the earth by working the soil, he starts to grow the vine, and gets drunk. Through this forgetfulness and fault of his, the true principle of government also lost its force at the very start. Noah held the reins of that government, and one of his sons mocked him.
One writer traces Noah's turn to the soil back to an earlier man.
Noah followed in the way of Cain and turned his attention to the ground, and serious failure followed. And so it is in Christian experience. As soon as we follow Cain's way and become occupied with the earth, Satan traps us in one of his snares.
God had just placed authority over life and death in human hands. The failure lands there.
Noah's work as a farmer was of course commendable, but people can misuse anything and bring trouble. This man had received the dignity of authority in government. Yet he allowed himself too much wine, became drunk, and lay uncovered in his tent. This illustrates the weakness of human government from its very beginning. Why is human government doomed to fail? Because those in authority fail to exercise self-government. If a man does not rule himself well, how can anyone trust him to rule others?
The man chosen was the best available. That is the sting of it.
God entrusted government over life and death to his keeping. And the man who first received that trust was by far the best fitted for it, in godliness and in experience. Yet look at the very next thing recorded of him. No doubt through self-indulgence and a lack of watchfulness, he not only sinned himself, but brought God's ordinance of government into open dishonour.
People have always tried to explain this episode away. One commentator refuses.
This, truly, was a high position — a place of immense power, privilege, and responsibility. How does Noah carry himself in it? He gets drunk, and degrades himself in front of his sons! Such is the plain, obvious fact. Men may reason as they will. They try to smooth it, soften it, and pare it down. They always do that when a great truth bears down on human pride and self-congratulation. But they cannot set aside the humbling fact that the head of the restored earth got drunk.
Long experience with God is no protection in itself.
Although Noah lived 350 years after he began to be a farmer, his name is never mentioned again... Men did not take notice of him that he had been with the Lord. Satan had won the victory over "the preacher of righteousness." This episode comes home with living power to every Christian, the oldest as well as the youngest. We do well to be watchful. "Let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall." (1 Cor. 10:12).
The passage does not end in despair, because the failure of the first ruler is a signpost.
Human government is now set up. It shows its weakness, not in the authority given to it, but in the feeble hands that received it. Noah fails to govern himself. So he becomes a picture of the failure of all government. Yet he is also a hint that One is coming who will reign in righteousness and bring blessing through His reign.
- Trial — God left nothing undone: covenant, authority, a cleansed earth. The new world was a fresh test of man, not a fresh kind of man.
- Snare — He turned to the ground, as Cain had, and its fruit trapped him. Good things become snares when we grow occupied with the earth.
- Self-rule — No one can rule others who cannot rule himself. The first man given authority could not govern one man: himself.
- Silence — Noah lived 350 more years and is never named again. One unguarded hour can end a lifetime's testimony.
- Successor — The first ruler failed. He points forward to the One who will reign in righteousness, where man's rule could not stand.
And he drank of the wine, and was drunken, and he uncovered himself in his tent.
God had cleared the earth by the flood and put the sword of government into Noah's hand. The first act recorded of the man He saved is a drunken collapse in his own tent.
The first question is what Noah actually drank.
Several Hebrew words are translated wine. Scripture attaches various words to it — "sweet," "new," "strong," "good," "mixed," "spiced," "on the lees" — yet all are wine. And the wine was intoxicating, as we already see in the days of Noah. Drinking to excess is the abuse of it, and Scripture is full of protests and warnings against such abuse.
after-note-none
The point is pressed further by noting where the word first appears at all: when yayin is first used in Scripture it carries the sense of fermented grape juice, as this verse and the account of Lot both show.
God had just made Noah responsible for human life and death. He broke down at that very point.
Man fails with government as well as without it — not the governed only, but the governor. Noah, that is, man, proves completely unable to wield the sword in righteousness before God. Whoever governs must first know how to rule himself. But Noah got drunk. And so another point comes out: man must have a ruler, and he clearly cannot be his own master. Part of God's purpose is to show this — to show the absolute need for the Man of His right hand to come and rule the earth.
Nothing dramatic brought Noah down. He was at ease, and off his guard.
This new trial had barely begun when man broke down. He failed at the very point he was responsible to keep intact before God and his fellow men. God had entrusted government over life and death to his keeping. The man who first received that trust was by far the best suited to it, in piety and in experience. Yet the next fact recorded of him is that, no doubt through self-indulgence and lack of watchfulness, he not only sinned himself, but brought God's ordinance of government into open dishonour. And the sin and the dishonour produced no godly sorrow in his own household, but contempt.
God left nothing out on His side.
Noah sits in the new world, endowed and blessed, enriched and honoured. He is instructed too, and appointed as "the power" under God. With all this he is at ease and knows he is safe, with no evil or enemy in sight. A new trial of man was going forward, under new circumstances. As with Adam in Eden, God leaves nothing undone on His part... In Christ, and in Him only, are unfailing faithfulness and strength. And Noah, like the rest, fails. The very first foot that trod the fresh soil of the new world stained it.
The same pattern repeats through the whole Bible.
What a condition to find Noah in — the only righteous man, the preacher of righteousness! What is man? Look at him where you will, and you see only failure. In Eden he fails. On the restored earth he fails. In Canaan he fails. In the Church he fails. In the presence of millennial blessing and glory he fails.
But this failure is not God's whole view of Noah.
before-note-none
We must look at Noah in two ways: as a picture, and as a man. The picture is full of beauty and meaning, but the man is full of sin and folly... Divine grace had covered all his sins, and clothed him with a spotless robe of righteousness. Though Noah exposed his nakedness, God did not see it. He looked at Noah not in the weakness of his own condition, but in the full power of divine and everlasting righteousness.
Noah's long record of favour and experience did not protect him.
Noah had all this high favour and special experience. Yet as soon as he was left to his own will, he became a slave to lust under Satan's influence. Noah followed in the way of Cain and turned his attention to the ground, and grievous failure followed. So it is in Christian experience. As soon as we become occupied with the earth, Satan traps us in one of his snares. Although Noah lived 350 years after he became a farmer, his name is never mentioned again. He was alive through the whole godless period that ended with the building of the Tower of Babel. Yet his presence did not restrain his descendants... "Let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall."
- Trust. God handed Noah power over life and death in a cleansed world. He was the best-qualified man, in the best conditions.
- Fall. The wine was real and intoxicating. The man given the sword could not rule himself, and so man needs the Man of God's right hand to rule.
- Cause. He was at ease, with no enemy in sight. Self-indulgence and a lack of watchfulness dishonoured the trust he held.
- Cover. Exposed before his own household, Noah was still clothed before God in a righteousness grace had given him.
- Watch. Long experience gives no protection. The man who is silent for his last 350 years warns anyone who thinks he stands.
And Ham the father of Canaan saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren outside.
Noah came safely through the flood. Now he lies drunk and uncovered inside his own tent, and what his son Ham does next — first looking, then telling — turns a private failure into public shame.
The failure starts with Noah, not with Ham. The one righteous man of that generation is the first to break down in the new world.
The last part of this chapter shows a humiliating scene. The lord of creation fails to govern himself... What a condition for Noah, the only righteous man, the preacher of righteousness, to be found in. What is man? Look at him wherever you like, and you see only failure. In Eden, he fails; in the restored earth, he fails; in Canaan, he fails; in the Church, he fails.
Ham did not cause the shame he saw. He chose what to do with it, and went outside to tell.
Noah's sin brought God's ordinance of government into open dishonour. In his own household it produced no godly sorrow, but contempt. His younger son Ham had no feeling for God's glory, and none for what he owed his father, even in such a disastrous moment. All he showed was the wickedness of his own heart: he mocked Noah without pity, and he was eager to spread his father's shame and to trap his two brothers. Their reverence was as plain as Ham's lack of it. He forgot to whom he owed his life, and his rescue from the flood.
There is a difference between falling into sin yourself and enjoying someone else's fall.
Noah is put to shame; but Ham, his son, glories in the shame. That was a terrible advance in the progress of evil... This was not simply being "caught in any transgression," but "rejoicing at wrongdoing."
Ham showed contempt for a father who was also a ruler.
Disrespect toward authority is a very grave sin, whether it is a parent's authority or a government's, because God set up both. In the end it leads to setting aside the authority of God, who set it up. Only when we weigh this properly do we see how right Noah's solemn curse was, once he learned what had happened.
Ham's attitude did not die with him.
This is the evil of despising government, which has become very common in the day in which we live (Jude 8). Though governments often fail badly, this gives us no right to reject or disobey proper authority (Romans 13:1-7).
Shem and Japheth saw the same thing and did the opposite. They covered their father, and that act pictures how God Himself deals with human shame.
Divine grace had covered all his sins, and clothed him in a spotless robe of righteousness. Noah exposed his nakedness, but God did not see it. He looked at him not in the weakness of his own condition, but in the full power of divine and everlasting righteousness. So we can see how far astray Ham was in what he did, how totally cut off from God and His thoughts. He knew nothing of the blessedness of the man whose iniquity is forgiven and whose sin is covered. Shem and Japheth, by contrast, show in their conduct a fine example of God's own way of dealing with human nakedness.
Love still works the same way.
Love is far from being indifferent to sin. But love does not have to expose sins, or gloat over the failure of others. If possible, love will deal with sins privately, so that they do not needlessly become public. When they are dealt with and judged, love will no longer speak of them or spread them abroad.
The verse names Ham as the father of Canaan, and that is where his sin bears fruit.
The wicked and scornful son reaped the fruit of his evil in his own son Canaan, just as God remembered the reverent modesty of Shem and Japheth in their descendants. Salvation is by grace, and it cannot fail, because it is the work of God in Christ, where God secures everything for His glory. Even where salvation may not be, God puts honour on obedience and on respect paid where it is due.
- Failure — the man God trusted with government could not govern himself. Man fails everywhere God places him.
- Exposure — Ham's guilt was not seeing his father's shame but spreading it. He went beyond falling into sin to enjoying another's fall.
- Contempt — despising a father, or a ruler, is a grave sin, because God set up both. An authority that fails still has a claim on our respect.
- Covering — Shem and Japheth acted the way God acts. Grace had already covered Noah's sin, and love still covers instead of spreading.
- Harvest — Ham's scorn bore fruit in Canaan, and his brothers' reverence bore fruit in their descendants. God honours respect paid where it is due.
And Shem and Japheth took the upper garment and both laid [it] upon their shoulders, and went backwards, and covered the nakedness of their father. And their faces were turned away, that they saw not their father's nakedness.
Two sons walk backward with a garment between them, so they never see their father lying exposed. Ham had just done the opposite, and commentators read the scene as a lesson in respect for authority and as a picture of how God covers shame.
The verse sets up a deliberate contrast. Ham went outside and spread the news. His brothers went in and left nothing to see. One writer traces Ham's behaviour back to a hard heart.
His younger son Ham cared nothing for God's glory, and nothing for what he owed his father, even in such terrible circumstances. He only showed the wickedness of his own heart. He made unfeeling fun of Noah, and was eager to spread his father's shame and trap his two brothers. Their reverence was as plain as Ham's contempt for God, and Ham forgot the one to whom he owed his life as well as his rescue from the flood.
Noah was not only their father. He was also the man God had put in charge of the new earth. His sons faced both facts at once.
Shem and Japheth showed Noah the respect he was due, both as their father and as the ruler in the new conditions. Ham did not. Disrespect toward authority is a very serious sin, whether it is a parent's authority or a government's. God set up both at the start. In the end it leads to setting aside the authority of God, who set it up.
Covering Noah was not a comfortable act. One writer feels the grief inside it.
The two brothers did a work of love. The graceless hardness of their own close relative stirred them to it all the more. Yet what sorrow must have filled their hearts. Their godliness forced them to turn their backs on the one they had always looked up to. And they had looked up to him rightly, with steady affection, honour, and gratitude.
Noah lies uncovered in this scene. One commentator asks how God saw him at that moment, and finds in the sons' action a model of God's own way with sin.
Divine grace had covered all his sins, and clothed him with a spotless robe of righteousness. Noah exposed his nakedness, but God did not see it. He did not look at Noah in the weakness of his own condition. He looked at him in the full power of divine and everlasting righteousness. So we can see how far astray Ham was in the course he took, and how completely cut off from God and His thoughts. He knew nothing of the blessedness of the man whose wrongdoing is forgiven and whose sin is covered. Shem and Japheth, by contrast, show in their conduct a fine example of God's way of dealing with human nakedness. So they inherit a blessing, while Ham inherits a curse.
This verse also gives a rule for daily life: cover another person's failure. But writers mark the limits of that rule.
The same principle holds true for a parent's authority and for a government's authority. Proper respect will seek to cover failure, not expose it. But we must stress this: it applies to cases of failure, not to cases of wicked abuse of authority.
Another writer shows how that covering works day to day.
Love is far from being indifferent to sin; but love does not necessarily expose sins, or gloat over the failure of others. If possible, love will deal with sins privately, so that they do not needlessly become public. When they are dealt with and judged, love will no longer speak of them or spread them abroad.
The blessing and curse in the next verses trace straight back to how each son handled his father's shame.
The wicked and scornful son reaped the fruit of his evil in his own child Canaan. The reverent modesty of Shem and Japheth was remembered in their descendants. Salvation is by grace, and it cannot fail, because it is the work of God in Christ. Even where salvation may not be in view, God puts honour on obedience and on respect paid where it is due.
- Sight — Ham looked and talked; his brothers refused to look at all. The same failure exposes what is in the heart of everyone who sees it.
- Garment — The coat on their shoulders pictures God's own way with human nakedness. He saw Noah clothed in righteousness, not in his weakness.
- Reverence — God set up authority, in the home and in the state. Despise it because the man failed, and you end up despising God who gave it.
- Cost — Covering a father's shame meant turning their backs on the man they honoured. Real love pays for the covering it gives.
- Harvest — Contempt bore fruit in Ham's line, and reverence in his brothers' line. God puts honour on respect paid where it is due.
And Noah awoke from his wine, and learned what his youngest son had done to him.
Noah wakes from his drunken sleep and learns what happened in his tent while he was helpless. The verse turns on one word — "knew": the man God had just set over the new earth finds that his own failure has drawn out contempt inside his own household.
God had given Noah authority in government. One writer points to where the failure started — not in his rule over others, but in his rule over himself.
God gave this man the dignity of authority in government. Yet he allowed himself too much wine and became drunk, and in that state he lay uncovered in his tent. This shows the weakness of human government from its very beginning. Why is human government doomed to fail? Because those in authority fail to govern themselves. If a man does not rule himself well, how can he be trusted to rule others?
The sin Noah wakes up to is not his own drunkenness but his son's response to it.
His younger son Ham had no feeling for God's glory, and none for what he owed his father, even in such terrible circumstances. He only showed the wickedness of his own heart. He mocked Noah without pity, and he was eager to spread his father's shame and trap his two brothers. Their reverence was as plain as Ham's contempt for God. He forgot to whom he owed his life and his rescue from the flood.
The phrase is a puzzle, because the order in which Noah's sons are usually listed is not the order of their birth.
Ham, we know, is declared to be "the little" one (Gen. 9:24) — usually translated "youngest". And the dates show that not Shem but Japheth was the eldest… Shem is named first in the usual formula of "Shem, Ham, and Japheth." That first place is not due to the order of birth, but to the spiritual purpose which gave Shem that position.
Commentators differ on whether the phrase points to Ham at all.
In Genesis, as here, the order is Shem, Ham and Japheth. We cannot assume this to be the order of birth. In Gen. 10:21, where Shem and Japheth are mentioned, Japheth is called the elder. And some ask whether "younger son" in Gen. 9:24 refers to Ham or to his son Canaan.
The curse Noah pronounces skips over the son who mocked him and lands on the grandson. One writer explains why such a curse was just, and why it fell where it did.
Disrespect of authority — whether a parent's or a government's — is a very grave sin, because God set up both. In the end it leads to setting aside the authority of God, who established it… When we come, in verses 25-27, to the curse that came from Noah's lips, we find it fell on Canaan with no mention of Ham. We think this shows two things. First, Noah's sad lapse happened some time after the flood. Enough years had passed for Canaan to have been born and become active. Second, Canaan was involved with his father in the matter, and the weight of the curse fell on him rather than on his father.
Another writer stresses the mercy in the limits of it.
Either way it was mercy to keep the curse Ham had surely earned within the narrowest limits, instead of spreading it over all his descendants. In judgment as in grace God is always wise.
The waking sets in motion a government that runs far beyond Noah's tent. The two brothers who covered their father are not forgotten either.
The wicked and scornful son reaped the fruit of his evil in his own offspring Canaan. In the same way, God remembered the reverent modesty of Shem and Japheth in their descendants… Even where salvation may not be, God puts honour on obedience and on respect paid where it is due.
The verse is not only Noah's disgrace. One writer reads his waking as the start of his recovery.
And the saint himself is soon restored. Noah awakens from his wine. The man who was overtaken recovers himself, through the Spirit. And the grace of God gives him a great triumph. It is a very precious and glorious triumph indeed, for the restored one judges his judge, and condemns his accuser.
- Failure. The ruler of the new earth could not rule himself. Human government has carried that weakness from its first day.
- Exposure. Noah's fall did not stay his own; it drew out the contempt of a son who forgot who had saved his life in the flood.
- Question. Commentators dispute the "youngest son" — Kelly reads it as Ham, "the little one," while others ask whether it points to Canaan.
- Restraint. The curse lands on Canaan alone, and mercy held it to the narrowest limits instead of spreading it over Ham's whole line.
- Reward. God repays both ways. Contempt bore fruit in Canaan; God remembered the brothers' reverence in their descendants. And Noah himself wakes not only to shame but to recovery.
And he said, Cursed be Canaan; Let him be a bondman of bondmen to his brethren.
Noah's words here are a curse, not a blessing, and they fall on a grandson rather than on the son who wronged him. Two questions press at once: why does Canaan bear what Ham did, and what does it mean to be a servant of servants?
This chapter began with God placing human government in Noah's hands. It ends with a sentence that fits the sin.
The end of this chapter shows that the man who first held human government could not govern himself. It is the old familiar story — man tried and found wanting, as always... The sin began with utter disrespect to a father... A man who despises the one he is bound to honour must come to shame and disgrace. He must be not just a servant but "a servant of servants." The highest pride always has the deepest fall.
The curse skips the offender and lands on his son. One writer sees restraint in that, not injustice.
When God governs the world, He does not confine Himself to the one person or generation involved in the offence... It was mercy not to punish Ham in all his descendants, but in Canaan. God is sovereign in judgment as in mercy, and altogether righteous. Canaan may well have played a part with Ham in the heartless insult and dishonour done to Noah... It was mercy not to draw everyone into God's avenging of the wrong, but to keep it within the smallest bounds.
Later history supports this reading. Not every line of Ham ended in servitude.
It may seem strange that Noah did not curse Ham himself, since it was Ham who failed to respect his father. But no doubt it was God who, in His government, led Noah... to visit Ham's conduct on his son. God had already blessed Ham along with Noah and had made a covenant with him — how then could He lead Noah to curse him?... Besides, we do not find that all Ham's sons became the servants of Shem; the curse fell upon Canaan only. It was Nimrod, Ham's descendant, who founded the great kingdoms of the East, and we never read of those kingdoms paying tribute to Israel as Canaan did.
Noah was not just venting anger at a family insult.
We must also remember that Noah spoke these words as a prophet. The later history of Canaan and his descendants fully justified his solemn words. The next chapter gives us the sons of Canaan. From them came the nations that lived east of the Mediterranean and just north of Egypt. That is how the region became known as the land of Canaan. Centuries later these nations were so vile in their gross sin that God ordered their destruction.
Israel's conquest did not exhaust the sentence.
No doubt an evident curse... fell on Canaan when fire out of heaven destroyed the guilty cities of the Plain for their enormous wickedness... Yet Scripture is plain that neither the curse nor the blessing is complete until Israel returns to the land under Messiah and the new covenant. Israel will be rooted there and blessed as long as the earth endures. "And in that day there shall be no more a Canaanite in the house of the Lord of hosts."
That last line is quoted from an older translation, not the ESV.
Some have used this verse to defend slavery.
This is no doubt prophecy. Even so, it does not give anyone the right to make slaves of others. God authorises no one to put Canaan's descendants under servitude. But Ham did not submit to authority as he should have. So his descendants would learn by experience what obedience to authority means... Canaan's line is not the only one under a curse. All mankind is under one: failing to keep on obeying everything the law commands (Galatians 3:10). Therefore, let us not think we are better than Ham.
Centuries later a woman of this line came to Jesus for help.
She was not only a Gentile but from a race under a special curse. So she drops a claim of kinship that the most wretched person in Israel could make, but that was worthless for her. She bowed and said, "Lord, help me."... The truth fully burst on her, and she submitted to it. Her faith, already real, threw off its hindrance and became great. She gives up all claim, for she had none. She confesses sovereign grace, and receives the blessing at once.
- Dishonour. The curse traces back to contempt for a father. The man who despised the one he was bound to honour takes the lowest place of all: servant of servants.
- Restraint. The blow falls on one branch, not on all of Ham's line. Commentators read that narrowing as mercy.
- Prophecy. Noah spoke as a prophet. Canaan's descendants filled their land with the corruption that later brought God's judgment on them.
- Warning. The verse gives no one the right to enslave anyone. All mankind stands under a curse for failing the law, so no reader stands above Ham.
- Grace. A woman from the cursed line claimed nothing, confessed grace, and went away blessed. Grace had the last word.
And he said, Blessed be Jehovah, the God of Shem, And let Canaan be his bondman.
After the flood Noah speaks a prophecy over his three sons: a curse on Canaan, a blessing tied to Shem's God, and room to spread for Japheth. The middle line is worded strangely — the blessing is not spoken over Shem at all, but over the Lord who is called his God.
The verse comes at the end of a chapter where authority on earth was first placed in human hands, and where that authority collapsed almost at once.
The moral point at the end of chapter 9 is this: Noah abuses the blessing given to him, and so destroys all his fitness to govern. Noah gets drunk: this is not exercising authority. Then comes the wickedness of Ham; and then "Blessed be the LORD, the God of Shem; and let Canaan be his servant."
Noah does not say "blessed be Shem." He blesses God — and the distinction is deliberate.
But Shem was blessed, or rather, the Lord God of Shem was blessed (v. 26). Of course we know that Israel came from Shem.
Throughout Genesis 9 God is called simply "God" as He restarts the world. The covenant name returns at exactly this point.
Then God begins the world again, so to speak (Genesis 9). But the moment relationship is in question (v. 26), we have Jehovah the God of Shem.
The next verse uses only the general name for God when it speaks of Japheth. One writer sees that change as a signal of two different favours.
The reader may note how fitting it is that Genesis 9:26 says "Jehovah the God of Shem," while Genesis 9:27 says only "God" for Japheth. There the meaning is enlargement in providence, not the promised blessing of a special relationship with Himself.
The name itself carries the point of the prophecy, and later Scripture picks it up.
Shem, meaning "name," becomes the family in which Jehovah, the Name, is to be revealed. Jehovah is the God of Shem. Soon we will see a son of Shem, Abram. His descendants become the keepers of Jehovah's revelation… He does not call Himself "the God of Japheth" but "the God of Shem." This shows Shem's supremacy. It is a far-reaching prophecy.
The line was honoured in real names and a real covenant.
"Blessed be the LORD, the God of Shem; and let Canaan be his servant." Abraham, Isaac and Jacob came from Shem's line, and God was not ashamed to be called their God. He brought them into covenant relationship with Himself. He will yet fulfil for their children all the promises He made to the fathers.
Yet the prophecy is not finished. Commentators here point past Israel's history to a fuller day.
Noah's prophecy gave the blessing to Shem. More exactly, the word was "Blessed be Jehovah, the God of Shem." So it has been. So faith knows now. And so it will be completely fulfilled, when Christ makes the truth undeniable in glorious results to every eye. This is not God's design either by the gospel or in the church. God keeps it for the age to come.
Shem's share in covering his father's shame stands behind the words spoken over him, and the same principle runs the other way for Ham.
The wicked and scornful son reaped the fruit of his evil in his own offspring Canaan. God remembered the reverent modesty of Shem and Japheth in their descendants… Even where salvation may not be present, God puts honour on obedience and on respect paid where it is due.
- Cause. One son scorned his father; two showed reverence. God remembered both in their descendants.
- Gift. Noah blesses God, not Shem. Shem's gift is the covenant name attached to his family line.
- Name. "Shem" means "name." God revealed His own Name in Shem's family line. It reached Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and God was not ashamed to be called their God.
- Reach. The covenant name marks relationship. The general name, used of Japheth in the next verse, marks enlargement in providence. Two different favours, one verse apart.
- Result. Israel's history showed only part of this. Commentators here hold that the full fulfilment waits for the age to come, when Christ makes the truth plain to every eye.
Let God enlarge Japheth, and let him dwell in the tents of Shem, And let Canaan be his bondman.
Noah's last words over his sons end with a blessing on Japheth: room to spread, a place inside Shem's tents, and Canaan as his servant. Three questions follow: what "enlarge" gives him, who dwells in those tents, and why Noah calls God here simply God.
Japheth's blessing is measured. It promises room on the earth, and it stops short of what Noah said over Shem.
Noah prophesied about him. He is not brought into relationship with God here, as Shem is. The prophecy foretells enlargement on the earth, and this has clearly come true.
That enlargement did not stay inside its own borders.
All history, even in the past, shows God enlarging Japheth, the great coloniser of the earth. Here he stands in the sharpest contrast with Shem. Japheth was not only to spread as a nation, as Shem never did. He was also to dwell in Shem's tents. Europe and the north-east of the old world were not enough. Neither was the new world of America, Australia, and so on. He must also push into Shem's tents in the east. This earliest oracle said so, and so it has happened to the letter, beyond anything human foresight could have expected.
Verse 26 and verse 27 use different names for God. Older translations print "Jehovah" where the ESV has "the LORD," and "Elohim" where it has "God." One writer reads that change as deliberate, and uses it to settle an old dispute.
Notice how fitting it is that Genesis 9:26 says "Jehovah the God of Shem," while Genesis 9:27 says only "God" for Japheth. Japheth's verse means enlargement in providence, not the promised blessing of a special relationship with Him. This gives a reason from the text itself, on top of the grammatical one, against an idea many have taken up: that the verse means God dwelling in Shem's tents rather than Japheth. If the Spirit of God meant that through Noah, would He not have said Jehovah Elohim, rather than simply Elohim?
Commentators have differed over who dwells in the tents. One writer names Japheth, and adds who Canaan must serve:
In verse 27 the "he" is Japheth, who "shall dwell in the tents of Shem," and Canaan shall be Japheth's servant as well as Shem's.
The tents are more than territory. They hold the promises, and Japheth's family came in to share them.
Have they not also dwelt in the tents of Shem? Not as mere conquerors, but perhaps, among other ways, as sharers in the blessing pictured so well by Israel's "own olive tree." In time this is where the adoption would be, and the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the service, and the promises. And here were not the fathers only, but the Son, the Messiah, whose personal dignity goes far beyond anything Israel has yet owned — to their own deep loss so far.
The nations that entered did so while Israel stood outside.
All the European nations come from Japheth. They have spread out to the ends of the earth, and they have entered into the favour that belonged to Israel. Israel, for the time being, has been cut out of that favour because of unbelief, as Romans 11 shows.
Beyond nations, the two blessings describe two ways of living that were never meant to be separated.
In their two blessings, Shem and Japheth give us two tendencies that often get split apart and should not be. Shem's is the receptive, contemplative life, and its danger is to drift into the mystical. Japheth's is the energetic, practical life, which, when it stands alone, tends to cut itself off from faith… Japheth's blessing is enlargement and dwelling in the tents of Shem. The practical life finds its true home in faith alone, and true service is only worship flowing out among men.
The prophecy took two thousand years to show its first signs. No power since has stopped it.
Japheth would enlarge and dwell in the tents of Shem. Two thousand years passed before the first signs of it appeared. Then Alexander, from Europe (Japheth's home), invaded the countries of Asia… Diplomats may plot and politicians may argue about it. They can no more stop it than they can stop the sunset. Four thousand years ago an old man said it would be, and it must be.
- Word. Noah's blessing on Japheth is the earliest oracle of its kind, and history has followed it to the letter.
- Gift. Japheth gets enlargement in providence. He does not get the special relationship with God that Shem receives.
- Reach. That enlargement filled Europe, the Americas and beyond, then pressed back east into the very lands of Shem.
- Entry. Dwelling in Shem's tents means sharing Shem's blessing: the olive tree, the promises, the Messiah. Gentile nations came in while unbelief kept Israel out for a time.
- Balance. Japheth's practical energy needs Shem's faith. The active life finds its home in faith, and true service is worship flowing out to others.
And Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty years.
Genesis ends Noah's story with a number: 350 years after the flood. What filled those long years, and why does Scripture tell us so little about them?
The number in this verse is large, but the record attached to it is thin. One writer sets the two side by side:
After the flood, God gave mankind a fresh start under Noah. But as under Adam, so again, failure and sin quickly followed. We have plenty of testimony that Noah was a godly man who found grace in the sight of the Lord. He lived for no less than 350 years after the flood, as the end of our chapter tells us. Yet only one thing about him is on record in all those years. He planted a vineyard and made wine. Self-indulgence trapped him, and he drank himself unconscious. The man now most responsible to control others lost control of himself. The age of patriarchal government broke down at the very start, even in the hands of a godly man.
Noah does not die here and vanish. He drops out of the story long before he dies, and the same happened earlier with Adam:
Noah lived on for centuries afterwards, but the history mentions him no more. Adam disappears in the same way after his sin, and Cain's crime led to Seth being given instead of Abel.
Those years were not quiet ones. Noah lived long enough to see what the world did with its fresh start:
Noah — whose name means rest, repose, comfort — lived some 350 years after the judgment of the flood. That was long enough, sadly, for him to see rebellion against God break out everywhere. He also saw idolatry rise and spread over the inhabited earth of that time.
Human lifespans start to fall right after Noah. One writer follows the numbers through the generations that come next:
Compared with his father Noah and those before him, Shem's years mark the growing decline of human age after the flood. Yet before he came near the end of his six hundred years, it was given to him to live into the days not only of Abram but of Isaac. Peleg, the fifth in this series, did not reach half the limit of Shem's term; and Nahor, the father of Terah, dwindled to a hundred and forty-five years. So in God's providential arrangements man was coming by rapid steps to the span of years that has been ordinary since the prayer of Moses in Psalm 90.
The world was new, but man was not. One writer sets Noah beside another figure who closed one era and opened the next:
Noah — like John the Baptist — closed one scene and opened another. He died in that new scene, just as those of the old order before him had died. In man nothing had changed, though his circumstances and even his guilt had changed a great deal. For man had now sinned against blessing and grace.
One writer ties the closing lines of Noah's record to the prophecy that came before them:
So it was to be, according to this earliest prophecy. And so it has happened, exactly to the letter. No human foresight could have expected it. This closes the divine account of Noah: "After the flood Noah lived 350 years. All the days of Noah were 950 years, and he died."
- Years. 350 after the flood, 950 in all — a long life given to a godly man who had found grace.
- Silence. Those years hold one recorded incident, and then the history drops Noah, just as it dropped Adam after his fall.
- Decline. His age is the high point. After him the years fall fast, generation by generation, toward the ordinary human lifespan.
- Death. A fresh start changed Noah's circumstances, not his nature. He died as everyone before him died.
- Word. What outlasts him is the earliest prophecy on record, which history has confirmed to the letter.
And all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years; and he died.
Genesis 9:29 closes the story of the man who came through the flood: a total of years, then the same three words that end every life in Genesis 5. Commentators ask why a man saved through judgment gets so short an epitaph, and what he leaves behind when he dies.
One writer sees the same pattern here as with Adam. The record turns to the sons, and the father drops out of the story.
The list of Noah's sons comes in the right place, after Noah's fall and its remarkable consequences. It is like Genesis 5, where the genealogy of Adam's sons followed his sin and Cain's sin, which had led to the revealed state of the world before the flood. Noah lived on for centuries afterwards, but the history never mentions him again, just as Adam disappears after his sin.
His death is also a handover. Everything the race had gained stood in one family.
The human race was completely one at the beginning, and in effect it was one again in Noah after the flood. Mankind's outward progress must have been all the greater because people lived so long. Whatever that progress was, the sons of Noah had all of it for their new start.
The number in the verse is large. The record inside it holds almost nothing.
After the flood, God gave mankind a fresh start under Noah. But as under Adam, so again, failure and sin soon followed. We have had plenty of testimony that Noah was a godly man who found grace in the sight of the Lord. He lived for no less than 350 years after the flood, as the end of our chapter tells us. Yet in all those years the record holds one thing only about him. He planted a vineyard, made wine, was trapped into self-indulgence, and became unconscious in drunkenness. The man now most responsible to control others lost control of himself. The age of patriarchal government broke down at the very start, even in the hands of a godly man.
His name promised one thing. The years he lived to see brought another.
Noah's name means rest, repose, comfort. He lived some 350 years after the judgment of the flood. That was long enough, sad to say, to see a general outbreak of rebellion against God, and the rise and spread of idolatry over the whole inhabited earth of that time.
Those last words are not about Noah's health. They are about the whole human race, and one writer points to where death came from.
There is no sound reason at all to doubt the long lifespans credited here to people before the flood. God made man to live, not to die; his death came in through sin… The span of years may seem long beside Psalm 90, where the prayer of Moses lays down the ordinary rule of human life. Even so, they were only the "days" of Adam, or of anyone else recorded here. After Adam they were born, and they had children; they lived and they died.
One writer sets that repeated phrase against a word that runs the other way.
The words "and he died" are repeated so many times in this chapter. They give us a striking contrast to the words "And He shall live," written about David's Son and Lord in Psalm 72:15.
(The ESV renders Psalm 72:15 "Long may he live.")
God brought Noah safely through the flood, but Noah still died. One writer sets his end beside Enoch, who never died at all.
"By faith Enoch was taken up so that he should not see death, and he was not found, because God had taken him" (Hebrews 11:5). "He was not, for God took him" (Genesis 5:24). We cannot help contrasting his outcome with that of Noah, another herald of the coming judgment. God did not remove Noah from the scene. In mercy He kept him safe through the ordeal, and then settled him in the cleansed earth. He took Enoch away before the judgment fell.
- Rescued. God brought Noah through the flood alive and set him over a cleansed earth. He can save a man out of a world under judgment.
- Silent. Of his 350 years after the flood, Scripture records only the vineyard and the drunkenness. The man responsible to control others could not control himself.
- Superseded. The history never mentions him again. He drops out after his fall, as Adam did, and everything passes to his three sons.
- Shadowed. He lived long enough to watch rebellion against God break out again. Idolatry spread across the earth he had inherited.
- Sentenced — and answered. "He died" is the verdict that closes every life from Adam onward, because death came in through sin. The answer is not a longer life. It is the Son of David, of whom Psalm 72 says, "He shall live."