And it came to pass when mankind began to multiply on the earth, and daughters were born to them,
The chapter that ends in a flood begins quietly: the human family grows, and daughters are born. Yet this one line opens one of the darkest episodes in Scripture, and commentators do not agree on what happened next.
One writer places this verse late in the world before the flood, and takes the "sons of God" of the next verse to be angelic beings:
As we open Genesis 6 we come to the later centuries of the age before the flood. The population had grown greatly, and human wickedness began to rise to a climax. Many have understood the term "sons of God" to mean men of Seth's line — the line of faith — who fell away and married daughters of Cain's line. But we agree with those who take the term to mean beings of an angelic order. That is plainly its sense in Scriptures such as Job 1:6, Job 2:1 and Job 38:7.
Commentators differ. Others read the phrase as the godly family line traced in the chapter before:
It was not long before mankind multiplied greatly on earth. The dreadful effects of sin multiplied with them. The corrupt mixture of "the sons of God" with "the daughters of men" shows this. We have seen in chapter 5 that the line of Seth kept "the likeness of God" in some measure at least. That is why they are called "the sons of God": they were separate from the evils of the line of Cain.
A third writer tests both views against how the Old Testament uses these two phrases:
There is no proof in the text that the daughters of men were only descendants of the Cainites. The text supports the view that "daughters of men" means the natural increase of the whole human family, and not a special class. The theory that "sons of God" must mean godly people also cannot stand. The Old Testament never calls believers "sons of God"… The believer is a son of God, predestined to the son-place, with the spirit of sonship in him, crying "Abba, Father." That truth is revealed only in the New Testament.
Scripture tells us very little about what happened. One writer sees that silence as deliberate:
The Holy Spirit has veiled such a fact in the only manner that suited God and was proper for man. Here the principle of reserve does apply. It does not withhold from a person's soul the deepest blessing of grace for his deepest needs. It simply gives no more than what was fitting for man to learn about the matter. He has said enough… In my judgment "the sons of God" in Genesis mean the same beings as in Job. That shows their chief guilt: they crossed the boundaries God had appointed for His creatures. No wonder that total ruin quickly follows. It is really the basis of fact for more than a few tales of mythology which men have made up.
One writer reads verse 1 in the light of the chapter before, which ends with Enoch taken to heaven:
Enoch has passed off the scene. His walk as a stranger on earth ended when he was taken to heaven without dying… How little influence his life and his departure had upon the world is clear from the first two verses of chapter 6… The mingling of what is of God with what is of man is a special form of evil. It is a very effective tool in Satan's hand for spoiling the testimony of Christ on the earth. This mingling may often look like something very desirable… something to be glad about rather than to grieve over. But our judgement about it depends on the point of view we look at it from… Separation from all evil is God's principle. No one can break it without doing serious damage to the truth.
One writer sets Noah's moment beside our own:
Notice next the moment in which Noah gave his testimony. There is some likeness between that moment and the present. The Lord Himself pointed this out in Luke 17:26-27… So Noah lived at the close of an age. The storm clouds of divine judgment were gathering on every side. We too live at the close of an age, and once more the judgment of God is preparing for an evil world. Men are as careless and indifferent now as they were long ago.
- Multiply. Numbers grew, and evil grew with them. This verse opens the last centuries before the flood.
- Mystery. Commentators differ on the "sons of God": some read angelic beings (from Job), others the line of Seth.
- Measure. God said enough and no more, and human myth-making rushed to fill the gap.
- Mixing. Ruin starts when people erase the line between what is God's and what is man's. At the time it looks attractive.
- Mirror. The same carelessness marks the present, which is why the Lord pointed back to Noah's days.
that the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair, and took themselves wives of all that they chose.
This verse opens one of the hardest passages in Genesis. Who are the "sons of God"? And why does their marriage to "the daughters of man" ruin the world? Commentators differ on who these sons are. They agree on what the union did.
One reading looks at how the Old Testament uses the phrase elsewhere, and at what Peter and Jude say.
There is no denying that the early books of the Bible use "sons of God" of angels (Job 1:6; Job 2:1; Job 38:7)... Old Testament usage gives no ground to question this. The phrase applies to angels, not to men — even faithful and righteous men. And the apostolic reference is indisputable. Peter and Jude view the awful crisis at the end of this age in the light of this scripture. They do so from quite different angles. Yet together they bear the testimony of the Holy Spirit that angels were meant here by "sons of God."
Another writer takes up the other half of the verse, and then the children this union produced.
The text supports the view that "daughters of men" means the natural increase of the whole human family, and not a special class. The theory that "sons of God" must mean godly people also fails. The Old Testament never applies the term "sons of God" to believers... The result of the marriage of the sons of God with the daughters of men was children who were heroes, men of the Name. Suppose the sons of God were only the godly descendants of Seth, who mixed with the descendants of Cain. Then it is hard to see why the offspring should be a special race, heroes, men of the Name. The giants were Nephilim, which means "the fallen ones."
Others read the sons as Seth's family marrying into the line of Cain. Their strongest support is the next verse.
But God's word in verse 3 settles this matter: "My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh." So "the sons of God" were the responsible parties here. They took wives; the wives did not take them. So God calls the sons of God "men," insisting also that they are "flesh," not spirit, as angels are. So early in history, this event stands as a solemn warning. Believers must not yoke themselves with unbelievers.
One writer sets the looking and the taking in this verse beside the first temptation in Eden.
If the cleverest of enemies seduced Adam, and he followed the sight of his eye and the desire of his heart, then an enemy just as successful now seduces the sons of God... They take wives from all "whom they choose." They listen to other lords, for God is not in all their thoughts. Then it does not matter whether it is the promise of the serpent or the beauty of the daughters of men.
Whatever the sons were, the sin blends two things God kept apart. One writer sees here a change of tactics by the enemy.
The union of the sons of God with the daughters of men led to the most disastrous consequences. True, the fruit of that union seemed extremely fair in man's judgement... yet God's judgement was quite different... If the holy seed will not keep its purity, everything must be forfeited as far as testimony on the earth goes. Satan's first effort was to put the holy seed to death and so frustrate God's purpose. When that failed, he tried to gain his end by corrupting it.
The result of such blending runs only one way.
The effort of Satan has always been to wipe out the distinction between good and evil. The alliance of good with evil never purifies the evil, but always defiles the good. Absolute separation of the one from the other is always God's way.
One writer sets the identity question aside and points to what is not in doubt.
We need not stop to ask the exact meaning of the phrase "sons of God"... It is enough to note what Scripture shows. A wall of separation stood between those who were OF GOD and those who were of MEN. Breaking it down was the immediate cause of the terrible evils which brought down God's displeasure.
- Disputed — Commentators differ on the "sons of God." Some say angels, from Job's usage and from Peter and Jude. Others say Seth's line, since verse 3 calls them men and flesh.
- Undisputed — Both readings agree on the sin. A wall God had set between two orders came down, and that caused the terrible evils that followed.
- Seen — The sin starts at the eye. They looked, found the women fair, and followed the desire of the heart, as Adam did.
- Chosen — Then the will acts. They took wives of all whom they chose, and God had no place in the choice.
- Mixed — Mixture is Satan's second move, after putting the holy seed to death failed. The union looked fair to men and produced heroes. But mixing good with evil never lifts the evil; it only defiles the good. God's way is always complete separation.
And Jehovah said, My Spirit shall not always plead with Man; for he indeed is flesh; but his days shall be a hundred and twenty years.
This is God's own comment on a world sliding into corruption. He gives a reason ("he is flesh") and a number (120 years) — and commentators ask what that number limits: man's lifespan, or God's pleading with him.
A note on wording. The ESV reads, "My Spirit shall not abide in man forever." The writers quoted here use an older translation: "My Spirit shall not always strive with man." Their comments turn on that word "strive."
One writer sets this sentence against the violence and corruption filling the earth:
That was the condition of the whole scene, from one end to the other. Against all this corruption and violence now spreading over the earth, God marks out His judgment: "My Spirit shall not always strive with man." There may be, and there will be, a period of patience — as it says, "his days shall be one hundred and twenty years" — but the judgment still stands, and the day when God comes to deal with men will come. The Spirit will not always strive.
The reason God gives is not that man is weak in body. It is what man has shown himself to be. One commentary ties the phrase to Isaiah's words about flesh and spirit, and notes that translators have long disagreed here:
Translators and commentators differ a good deal over how to translate this verse and how far it reaches... But the sense is moral rather than physical existence, and the older English version gives it well enough. Some prefer "in his wandering" instead of "for that," and that may well be right. So Isaiah 31:3 says that Egypt is man and not God, and their horses flesh and not spirit. Man had now proved himself no better. But when the LORD warns that His Spirit will not always plead, He is setting a limit to His patience. The hundred and twenty years refer, not to the length of man's life, but to the space given for repentance.
Another writer prefers the same alternative reading, and sets out the verse as he would render it:
He is flesh — mortal man — and not God... But De Wette, in his translation, takes the 120 years as the length of life. I believe that is a complete mistake. It is the time allowed for preaching repentance, and for building the ark. "In their wanderings" would be just as good as "because of," or better. The verse would then read: "My Spirit shall not always strive with man (or among men) in their wanderings — he is flesh — but his days shall be 120 years."
Another writer points out that people went on living far longer than 120 years:
It is strange that anyone should think this sets a limit to human life, which was then, and for generations afterwards, far longer. It is the limit of the Spirit's striving with that generation, and at the end of it the flood came. For them the end of the Spirit's striving and the end of their life came together.
God did not strive in silence. He used a preacher, and the long years while the ark was built:
So He was present by His Spirit in the days of Noah... His Spirit was then on the earth. In His patience God waited one hundred and twenty years while the ark was being built. His Spirit preached then. But He needed an instrument. The instrument was Noah. In him was the Spirit of Christ, and as the preacher of righteousness (2 Peter 2:5) he brought the warning of coming judgment to the people around him. They did not listen. They went on in disobedience, were swept away by the flood, and are now the spirits in prison.
The set term also answers a question about those same souls. Once the term ran out, the striving stopped:
That is to say, His Spirit would strive through the testimony of Noah for a hundred and twenty years, and no longer. It would be a very strange thing if the Lord kept on striving by testimony with these people only (for he speaks only of them) after they had died.
One writer turns the verse into a guard against treating God's patience as permission:
Sinners, the time is soon coming when the drawbridge of mercy will be pulled right up... God holds back punishment, so men hold back repentance... But though men will not set limits to their sin, God does set limits to His patience.
- Cause — The verdict is moral, not physical. Man had proved himself to be nothing better than flesh, so God's Spirit will not plead with him forever.
- Gift — The 120 years are the space given for repentance, not a shortened lifespan. People went on living far longer for generations afterwards.
- Voice — The striving had a preacher. The Spirit of Christ was in Noah, who warned the people around him while the ark was built.
- Result — For that generation, the Spirit's striving and their lives ended together. Those who disobeyed are the spirits now in prison.
- Warning — Men will not set limits to their sin, but God sets limits to His patience. So His patience is never a reason to delay.
In those days were the giants on the earth, and also afterwards, when the sons of God had come in to the daughters of men, and they had borne [children] to them; these were the heroes, who of old were men of renown.
This verse sits in the darkest part of the story before the flood. It names giants on the earth, a strange union, and heroes whose fame outlived them. Two questions follow. Who were the Nephilim, and who were the sons of God?
Many Bibles leave the Hebrew word "Nephilim" untranslated. One reference work weighs its meaning and separates these beings from the children born of the union:
Nephilim. The meaning of this word is uncertain: some trace it to a root meaning 'to fall,' but it is not clear whether it means 'fallen ones' or 'those who fall upon.' They were men of great stature, which made the Israelites think of themselves as grasshoppers by comparison. Some have supposed they were the offspring of the sons of God and the daughters of men, but Scripture does not say so. It describes those born of that union as "mighty men (gibborim) which were of old, men of renown." Scripture says only that the Nephilim were "in the earth in those days," and they were also seen by the spies about a thousand years later: this is all that is revealed about them.
The verse names two groups: the giants already there, and the heroes born of the union. One writer sets out that reading and what made the second group famous:
The wording of verse 4 is not easy. It appears to distinguish between the Nephilim or giants in those days, as afterwards also, and the Gibborim, mighty ones or heroes, who were the fruit of the union of the sons of God with men's daughters... These, being of quite a different source and character, had a fame all their own for might. The reputation they gained of old was not founded on mere stature, like that of the Nephilim.
Commentators differ here, and have long done so:
There were 'sons of God' who took wives of 'the daughters of men.' Genesis 6:4. Some believe these were angels, permitted to take human form: compare Jude 6, 7. Others judge that the descendants of Seth are meant.
One writer argues for angels from the way Job uses the phrase, and answers the usual objection from the Lord's words about angels:
Who are the sons of God referred to here? Believing men are undoubtedly called "sons of God" in Romans 8, but it would be beside the point to bring that thought into Genesis 6. The expression is best explained by its use in the book of Job, written about the same time, and there it is beyond all doubt used of angels (Job 1:6; 2:1; 38). Genesis 6 therefore tells us of the spirit world breaking its bounds and entering into unholy connection with the human family... It is beside the mark to quote Luke 20:34-36 as an objection to this. The Lord is there describing the proper state of angels, the state from which the offenders of Genesis 6 departed.
"Men of renown" is man's verdict. God's verdict was the opposite:
True, the fruit of that union seemed exceedingly fair in man's judgement, as we read, "the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown;" yet God's judgement was quite different. He does not see as man sees... So much for mixing the holy with the unholy. It will always be so. If the holy seed will not keep its purity, all must be forfeited as far as testimony on the earth is concerned. Satan's first effort was to frustrate God's purpose by putting the holy seed to death, and when that failed he sought to gain his end by corrupting it.
The fame of these men outlived them and turned into story:
The monstrous men produced were monsters of iniquity, filling the earth with violence and corruption. Yet man in his fallen condition is such that these monsters, instead of being counted men of infamy, were treated as men of renown. They were doubtless the originals from whom sprang those tales of "gods" and "goddesses" and "Titans," and so on, which have come down to us in the writings of antiquity.
The verse also answers a common argument: that mixing with what is corrupt will lift it.
The most common excuse for a Christian mixing with the world is this: by doing so he will help to raise and purify the people he joins himself to. We need go no further into the Bible than Genesis 6 to see how false that argument is... The sons of God did not elevate the daughters of men, and their offspring took after the baser strain.
- Boundary. Something crossed a line: on one reading, the spirit world broke its bounds and entered into connection with the human family.
- Two classes. The Nephilim were already "in the earth"; the Gibborim, the mighty men, were the fruit of the union. The text keeps them apart, and only the second group carries renown. The giants show up again a thousand years later, when the spies see them.
- Disputed identity. Commentators differ on the sons of God — angels allowed to take human form, or the descendants of Seth.
- Reversed verdict. Men crowned these heroes as great; God judged the union and its fruit quite differently.
- Result. The mixture filled the earth with violence and corruption, and left behind the old tales of gods and Titans. Mixing never lifts the lower; it drags down the higher.
And Jehovah saw that the wickedness of Man was great on the earth, and every imagination of the thoughts of his heart only evil continually.
Before the flood, God reads the human race — not its behaviour alone, but the hidden springs behind it. Does that verdict cover one wicked generation, or every one of us? (Where the writers quote the older wording "imagination," the ESV reads "intention.")
The verse works in layers. Each one goes deeper than the last:
How piercing verse 5 is! Man's wickedness became great, or abundant, for he was wholly evil in the deepest springs of his being. His heart was evil; the thoughts of his heart were evil, and the imagination, which lay behind and prompted his thoughts, was evil. And all this was only evil — not one trace of good — and that continually. So before the flood we have the very same verdict about man that Romans 3:10-18 gives us. That passage quotes Scriptures which describe the condition of men after the flood.
God's judgment did not rest on one ground alone:
The Spirit of God has been pleased to state two grounds on which God brought the judgment of the flood on man. First, because of what he had done: "The wickedness of man was great in the earth." Further on we read that this took two forms, corruption and violence. They are the parent sins of Genesis 3 and 4... Second, because of what he was: "Every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually." Or, as the margin reads, "The purposes and desires of his heart" were such.
One writer weighs each word of the verdict in turn:
"Every imagination" — without exception. "Only evil" — without any mixture of good. "Continually" — without a pause. What a picture!
The verdict weighs more because of who reached it:
It would be hard to find a more solemn verdict. "Every imagination" of them was before Him. He loves to credit the least thought or feeling that is good, yet He saw nothing but evil all the day. He is surely the God of judgment, and after due testimony He will not be slow to carry it out.
If the evil lies in the nature itself, effort cannot reach it. One writer answers the obvious objection:
There is nothing good at all in our sinful nature. Even the most advanced believer said, "I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh" (Romans 7:18). But can it not be improved by diligence in prayer and watchfulness? No, never: it is wholly incurable... We may not be able to bend a bar of iron, yet it may be beaten out until it becomes quite flexible, but it is the same iron still. Its appearance has changed, but its nature is the same.
Does this describe only the people of Noah's day?
Was it true then? Is it true today? What does God see in the men of this day? What is the difference between the men of that day and this day? There is none. Man is man. You cannot change him. "Can the Ethiopian change his skin or the leopard his spots?" (Jeremiah 13:23). No, and you cannot change man either. Take a drunkard, an unsaved man. Reform him and polish him up. He is still an unsaved man... There must be a work of God in his soul. Note the force of Scripture. Man is wrong at heart. "Out of the heart come evil thoughts" (Matthew 15:19). Men can read what is outside, but God reads the heart.
Sin ran its course, yet one man stood in a different relation to God. Where this writer says Noah "found grace," the ESV reads that he "found favor in the eyes of the LORD":
But "Noah found grace in the eyes of Jehovah." That is, God's favour rested on him. He was righteous himself, no doubt, but it all came through grace... But the earth was completely filled with violence. Every imagination of the thoughts of man's heart was only evil continually; if sin comes in, it is sure to ripen up.
- Sight — God's verdict starts with what He sees. He sees the wickedness on the earth, and behind it every intention of the heart. He would credit any good He found there, and He found none.
- Source — The verdict moves inward through three layers: heart, thoughts, and the imagination behind them. The problem is what man is, not only what he does.
- Sweep — "Every," "only," and "continually" leave no exception, no mixture of good, and no interval of relief.
- Stubbornness — Polish cannot change a nature like this. Iron beaten flexible is iron still. Only a work of God in the soul changes a man.
- Salvation — In the same dark chapter, Noah found favour in the eyes of the LORD. That favour rested on him as a gift, not as a reward.
And Jehovah repented that he had made Man on the earth, and it grieved him in his heart.
Genesis 6 turns from man's spreading wickedness to how that wickedness struck God Himself. Can the God who knows everything regret what He made, and can a creature's sin really grieve his Creator?
God brought the flood for two reasons, not one. One writer sorts them into what man did and what man was:
The Spirit of God has chosen to tell us two grounds on which God brought the judgment of the flood on man. First, because of what he had done: "the wickedness of man was great in the earth." Further on we read that this took two forms, corruption and violence. Second, because of what he was: "every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually"; or, as the margin reads, "the purposes and desires of his heart" were such.
The verse names the LORD, not God considered in the abstract. He watches His creatures, and here He finds nothing to credit them with:
This is not God simply in His nature, but the God who concerns Himself with the ways of His creatures... He who loves to credit the least good thought or feeling saw nothing but evil all the day.
Older translations say God "repented." The ESV reads that He "regretted." Either way, the word does not mean what it usually means for us:
Much depends on grasping the meaning of the word "repent." In Scripture it does not usually mean remorse or sorrow, as so many think. It means a change or turnaround in the attitude of the mind... In any sense of regret or remorse about His personal actions, we are assured that God "is not a man that He should repent."
So God speaks here in terms we can feel. Writers note that these early chapters often speak this way:
No doubt, as is so typical of these early revelations, grace shapes the words in a childlike way for the heart and conscience of man. The LORD felt deeply what man ought to have felt but did not.
Words fitted to us are not words emptied of truth. One writer weighs what this grief must have cost God, then asks a hard question:
God is infinitely great, and His holy nature is spotless and pure. So His grief must have been infinite. Yet He must have known in advance that this great grief would come to Him through the fall and corruption of mankind. Why then did God make man, and then let him stay on earth after causing Him such untold grief?
Set beside the opening chapters, the verse reverses God's own verdict on His work:
At the end of Genesis 2 God called everything, man included, "very good." Once man had been very good in God's eyes. Now he was nothing but grief to look at. The break was complete.
If God can repent of making man, a believer might wonder whether He can repent of saving one. The distinction drawn is between an act and a gift:
The gifts of God are without change of mind on His part. When it is not a gift or a calling of God, He may repent. So He repented of creation (Gen. 6:6), as we are told; and He destroyed it. That was not a gift; but simply an act, however immense. But in sovereign love He calls poor guilty men to Himself to make them His own. He gives eternal life, for instance, or forgiveness of our sins, or the place of a child. Such gifts are the gifts and calling of God, and they come without any change of mind.
Grief is not God's last word about man. The delight He lost is found again in Christ, the child born at Bethlehem:
All this delight was changed; God repented that He had made man on the earth. But in the Child of Bethlehem man is recovered and set up again. God delights in this man, and no such change of mind is possible. No other object in all His creation could awaken the same delight.
- Seen — God judged what man did and what man was: corruption and violence outside, evil thoughts within.
- Felt — God found nothing good to credit in man. He felt what man should have felt and did not.
- Worded — "repented" means a changed attitude, not remorse. Scripture uses childlike terms so our hearts can take it in.
- Unchanged — God may repent of an act like creation. He never repents of a gift: eternal life, forgiveness, the place of a child.
- Restored — the delight God lost in the first man returns in Christ, and nothing can reverse it.
And Jehovah said, I will destroy Man, whom I have created, from the earth -- from man to cattle, to creeping things, and to fowl of the heavens; for I repent that I have made them.
God here decides to wipe out the human race He had made, along with the animals, birds and creeping things. The verse raises two hard questions: can God feel grief, and can God change His mind?
Scripture here speaks of God in human terms. One writer explains why:
Verse 6 tells us how all this affected the Lord. Here for the first time Scripture gives God human feelings. Only in this way could we understand such a matter, and there is nothing out of place in it, since God made man in His own image and likeness. But God's thoughts and feelings must be far deeper and far higher than any man knows. How great His grief must have been! All was good at the start. Now all was so detestable that nothing could meet the case but the total destruction of mankind, apart from a few, and of the living creation God had entrusted to man.
The verse also uses God's personal name, "the LORD" — Jehovah in older translations — and not the general word "God." One writer explains what that name signals:
The name Jehovah is needed where the point is not nature but relationship — the feelings and the position it brings.
The verse ends with God saying He is sorry He made them. That sounds like God admitting a mistake, and one commentator draws a careful line here:
But here we must make a distinction, or we will certainly go badly wrong. Scripture says here that the LORD repented of mankind, whom He had made on the earth. His work is a thing quite different from His purpose. Corruption spread all through it, and He had no duty to keep in existence what existed only to His dishonour. On the other hand, when a prophet cried out against a great city because of its wickedness, and its people repented at the preaching, God repented of the harm He had said He would do to them, and He did not do it… But here we are not told of the slightest effect.
Another writer contrasts God's creation with God's calling:
God did repent of creation, in the state it had reached… But God's calling is His purpose. He has sworn in His holiness, and He will not repent.
God does not describe the doomed race as strangers. He calls them the ones He created. Some deny that unconverted people are God's creatures at all. One writer answers that teaching from this verse:
Genesis 6:7: God says, "I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the land." But according to this teaching, He had not created at all what He was going to destroy.
The sentence reaches past people to beasts, creeping things and birds. One writer draws out what that says about sin:
Yet animals, creeping things and birds fall under this awesome destruction too, for man's sin has involved the rest of the earthly creation. People may say that when they sin they have damaged only themselves. But man's sin always affects others too, even creatures that cannot reason.
The story does not end there. The same writer points to what waits for that fallen creation:
The creation fell with the first man. But God's word says all its groaning waits for the triumph of the Second man, when the sons of God are revealed. What joy to know it!
Notice who hears this sentence. God does not just announce it from a distance. One writer traces how personally He acts here:
How much interest the Lord God takes in the whole state of things in that day! Just as we all feel, His eye affects His heart. And then, just as we all do, He takes counsel with Himself… And after all this, just as we ourselves would do, He settles His mind and tells it to a friend. He passes it to the ear, the heart and the sympathies of another.
Noah's response shows what the warning was for:
His faith accepted God's warning, and that warning moved him to fear. Fear moved him to act.
- Grief — for the first time, Scripture gives God human feelings. His grief runs far deeper than any grief we know.
- Regret — God repents of His work in its ruined state, never of His purpose. He has sworn to His calling and will not repent of it.
- Created — the people He judges are still the ones He made. Judgment does not cancel His place as their Creator.
- Reach — the sentence spreads from man to beast and bird. Sin never stays inside the sinner, and creation's groan waits for the Second man.
- Result — God tells the decision to a friend. Noah's faith turned that warning into fear, and fear into action.
But Noah found favour in the eyes of Jehovah.
God has just announced the flood. The whole race is to be wiped out. Then the record turns on a single word: but. One man stands outside that verdict, and his name carries the first mention of grace in the Bible — the word older translations use here, where the ESV says "favor."
The verse sets one man against a whole population.
One man alone found favor in the eyes of the Lord (v. 8). Noah was righteous in his dealings with people and blameless in his own character, because "he walked with God." The earth's population had grown so large, and it is a tragedy that only one man walked with God. In this he is a picture of the Lord Jesus. Yet he also shows that a believer can walk in true, godly separation from an evil world, even when no one else joins him... a lonely path with God is infinitely better than having many friends without God's presence.
The phrase is not special wording kept for Noah. It is the ordinary way of saying that one person stood in another's favour.
But "Noah found grace in the eyes of Jehovah" — that is, God's favour rested on him. He was righteous himself, no doubt, but it all came through grace. Moses says, "If I have found grace in your sight"; it is a common expression. In the next chapter God says of Noah, "I have seen that you are righteous before me in this generation."
Verse 8 stands before verse 9, and the sequence is deliberate. Grace is not the wage paid for a good life; a good life is what grace produces.
It is written: "Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord." This comes before the statement, "Noah walked with God" (Gen. 6:8-9). This is always God's order. No man can walk with God until he has tasted the grace of God.
One writer pushes back hard on the idea that Noah's character earned God's favour:
The very way Scripture tells the story should have stopped anyone from thinking that Noah's character in verse 9 is the reason for God's favour to him. Reason of grace! What an idea and expression! Scripture flatly denies any such thought: "If it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works; otherwise grace would no longer be grace." Noah's righteous ways, his walk with God, flowed (as always) from God's favour.
Here the divine name is the LORD — Jehovah in some translations. In the next verse Noah walks with God. Scripture picks each name on purpose.
The phrase "walked with God" is not casual but deliberate. It suits plain historical mention, and it also sets a moral contrast with those marked by the violence and corruption of all flesh on the earth. The name Jehovah is required where the point is not nature but relationship — feelings and position toward another.
Faith is what set Noah apart, and it put him on a different side of the verdict from everyone else.
The first time the word grace occurs in the Bible it is bound up with Noah — "But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord" (Gen. 6). He believed God when the whole world did not. That made him a righteous man among disobedient men. They were a condemned race; he alone was justified.
Favour here has a practical outcome later in the story. The man who found it was already safe when the waters came.
Notice this: before God's government ever carried out its judgment, the chosen family, and all with them, were shut safely inside the ark, the vessel of grace... God in grace saved Noah before God in government swept the earth clean with judgment... Every atom of the ark carried the sweet stamp of grace; every wave of the flood reflected the solemn decree of government.
God tells Noah what is coming, and gives him work to do about it.
God tells His chosen one that the end of all flesh had come before Him... He tells him how He saw and judged the moral condition of the earth — the very thing He had said in secret before. Then He tells him to get an ark ready to save his household, because in the plans of His electing love and sovereign purpose Noah had already found grace in His eyes.
- Ruin — the sentence falls on the whole race, and one man stands on the other side of the word but.
- Grace — God's favour rested on Noah. His righteousness grew out of that favour; it did not come first.
- Order — grace first, walk second. That is always the sequence; a reason for grace would stop it being grace.
- Ark — the favour of verse 8 becomes a shut door: saved by grace before the judgment of government fell.
- Reach — the first grace in the Bible reaches one man in a condemned world, and still works the same way.
This is the history of Noah. Noah was a just man, perfect amongst his generations Noah walked with God.
Genesis 6:9 introduces one man whose life stood in total contrast to the world around him. It answers the question every reader of the flood story asks: why was Noah spared?
Some writers below quote an older translation: Noah "found grace" and was "a just man, perfect in his generations." The ESV says he "found favor" and was "a righteous man, blameless in his generation."
One writer reads the verse's opening line as the reason Noah's household escaped the flood:
Then in Genesis 6:9 we read, "These are the generations of Noah." This gives the fitting ground for his escape from the flood, along with his three sons and their wives.
Verse 8 says Noah found favour in God's eyes. Only after that does Scripture describe his character. One writer shows why that order matters, and what "perfect" does not mean:
It is written: "Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord." This comes before the statement, "Noah walked with God" (Genesis 6:8-9). This is always God's order. No man can walk with God until he has tasted the grace of God. "Noah was a just man, and perfect in his generations." "Perfect" does not mean "sinless." His sad failure after he came out of the ark is proof enough (Genesis 9:21). But, as the margin suggests, Noah was an upright man who sought to walk before God in integrity.
Calling Noah righteous is not the same as saying he was justified before God. One writer separates the root from the fruit:
Further, it is not correct to say that he was a just man, that is, justified before God. … The grace that justified him worked in him and through him practical righteousness before man. … The one (in Romans 4) is justification before God, the root of all. The other is the resulting fruit "shown" before man. Each is indispensable in its place; both are united in their season in every true believer. Practical righteousness is the effect, in no way the cause, of justification by faith. … We also know from Hebrews 11:7 that faith was the starting principle, through grace, of the conduct that marked him out in that day. By that faith he also condemned the world, as heir of the righteousness that is according to faith.
Scripture uses the same words of one man before Noah:
It is recorded in Genesis 5:22, "Enoch walked with God." … These two devout men lived in evil days, but they walked in separation from the evil, and in communion with God.
That walk also produced a public witness. Set beside Lot, the contrast is sharp:
Noah is an example of the separate saint bearing testimony to the world… Peter tells us that he bore witness for God as a "preacher of righteousness". Lot is a picture of a large class of believers. They have no faith for the separate path, so they settle down in the world. They are saved in the end, but they are no testimony to God while they pass through it. Peter does tell us that Lot was a "righteous man". Yet, by living among the wicked, he tormented his righteous soul day after day. He knew nothing of a walk in peace and nearness to God.
Scripture describes only one man this way. That carries a lesson for anyone who finds no company in following God:
Noah was righteous in his human relationships and blameless in his personal character, because "he walked with God." The earth's population had grown so large. It is deeply sad that only one man walked with God. In this he is a picture of the Lord Jesus. Yet he does show that a believer can walk in true, godly separation from an evil world, even with no one else to share that path. … In any case, a lonely path with God is far better than having many friends without God's presence.
What followed tested this description, and God then repeated it:
That is how Scripture describes this man when he first appears in the record, at the ripe age of five hundred years. He then made the ark as God directed. God said to him, "I have seen that you are righteous before Me in this generation" (Genesis 7:1). He proved that he was righteous. He illustrated the obedience of faith.
- Grace first. Noah found favour before Scripture ever calls him righteous. No one walks with God until he has first tasted God's grace.
- Then character. "Blameless" means integrity, not sinlessness; his later failure proves it. His righteousness was the fruit of grace, never its cause.
- Then the walk. Walking with God meant communion with Him and separation from the evil of his day. Scripture says the same of Enoch.
- Then testimony. That separate walk made him a preacher of righteousness. Lot was righteous too, but he settled in the world and bore no witness there.
- Then proof. A lonely path with God is better than crowded company without Him. God Himself confirmed the verdict: "I have seen that you are righteous before Me in this generation."
And Noah begot three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
Genesis 6 tells of corruption, violence and coming judgment. In the middle of it stands one man and a short family list — three names that carry the whole future of the human race, set down in an order that is not the order of their birth.
Other passages let us work out the actual order of their births, and it does not match the list here. One writer sets the lists side by side:
In Genesis 6:10 we find the names of Noah's sons: Shem, Ham and Japheth. Turn to Genesis 10:1 and 1 Chronicles 1:4, and each chapter gives the same names in the same order. Yet in the light of Genesis 9:24 and 10:21 we gather that the actual order of their birth was Japheth, Shem and Ham. But Shem was the one specially chosen in the sovereignty of God, so his name comes first.
Commentators differ on one detail: whether "younger son" in Genesis 9:24 means Ham himself or his son Canaan.
This swap is not a one-off:
A different order than the natural one is before us. The reason: the natural order — that is, birth order — constantly gives way when it crosses the order of grace and God's purpose of blessing.
Everyone alive today traces back to these three men and their wives:
A fresh start for the race began after the flood that judged a guilty world. God preserved Noah and his three sons from destruction. From them began conditions that continue today, and that will continue for their descendants until the Son of Man comes with the clouds of heaven... So the history of man is comparatively recent, and so is his threefold separation into lands and languages, families and nations. This time the race does not begin with a single line. We have three heads with their wives — three great families to renew the history of man on earth.
God names the three sons here, before the ark is even built. They will enter it as part of a household. On what ground?
The Lord commands Noah to enter the ark with his house on this ground: "For I have seen that you are righteous before me in this generation." Someone may object that all the members of the household were probably righteous before God too. But the later history of one of them — Ham — forbids that thought. So nothing can weaken the force of the statement: God delivered the family of Noah from the judgment of the flood because of the faith of its head.
One quiet detail in the family list is easy to walk past:
The three sons of Noah, all married men, did not carry one infant into the ark. Eight adult persons passed through the flood. What a touch this is, showing God's thoughtful arranging, His planning tenderness! And it comes in such an unexpected place that it may well comfort many who are going through hard circumstances.
The three lines do not develop alike:
The fountain heads were three, first named in this order: Shem, Ham and Japheth. The first was the family in which God would establish His covenant on earth, and with which He would be in relationship. Then came the one who stood in hostility to God's family. Last came the Gentile Japheth, though he was the eldest and proudest.
After the flood the same three names appear again, with one phrase added — and that phrase casts a long shadow:
Scripture again draws attention to the three heads of Noah's race, "Shem, and Ham, and Japheth," in the same order as before (Genesis 5:32, 6:10, 7:13). Now there is an ominous addition: "and Ham is the father of Canaan." The sad incident that follows explains this at once, and the solemn prophecy that closes the chapter explains it still more. That prophecy echoes through the whole Old Testament, and it will only be brought to completion in that kingdom which awaits the Anointed of Jehovah.
- Named — In a chapter about total corruption, God records three ordinary names. He is already preparing the line through which the world will continue.
- Chosen — Shem stands first, though he was not the firstborn. Birth order gives way to God's purpose of blessing.
- Carried — The sons entered the ark on their father's faith, not their own. Ham's later behaviour proves it.
- Multiplied — From these three men and their wives the whole human family began again, in all its languages and nations.
- Divided — Later the same three names reappear, now with "Ham is the father of Canaan" attached. Coming through judgment is not the same as walking with God.
And the earth was corrupt before God, and the earth was full of violence.
Just before the flood, God looked at the world and summed it up in two words: corrupt and violent. Two questions follow — why these two evils, and why is the earth itself charged, not only the people in it?
One writer reads the verse as Scripture's own account of how sin works.
There are two forms in which sin, or the activity of man's will, shows itself — violence and corruption. This showed itself at the time of the flood. The earth was corrupt in God's sight, and the earth was filled with violence. Satan is a liar and murderer. In man, corrupt desires are even a more abundant source of evil.
These two evils are not new, and they do not point the same way.
Corruption and self-will have been at work from earliest ages, and in fact were the two great evils let loose among the race in the period before the flood is Godward; violence manward.
Order matters here. Scripture names corruption first, and one writer explains why people get the ranking of these two evils backwards.
Then comes man's most serious evil — his corruption before God. That corruption led to an earth filled with violence (v. 11). Violence is against other people, and people call that the worst thing. But their corruption is against God, and they think little of it. If there were no corruption, there would be no violence. … God tells Noah that the end of all flesh was near, because the earth was filled with violence. Violence was the glaring proof of man's corruption (v. 13).
Why did violence fill the earth with no check on it? One writer looks at the age itself, and at the risk run by anyone who spoke against it.
Genesis 6 tells us that the earth was corrupt in God's sight. It also tells us that "the earth was filled with violence." God had set up no government, and men gave free rein to their lawless desires. They took revenge on one another without restraint. Imagine a man among them condemning their terrible ungodliness and warning that the Lord was coming to judge them. Would they hear him without their anger rising to murderous heights?
One writer traces this ruin back to its start, and takes the word "earth" at face value.
Ever since sin entered the world through the fall of man, its degrading defilements have been spreading. … Notice: corruption had affected the earth itself, for man had also corrupted God's way. Material as well as moral corruption was present.
This is God's own verdict, not a human survey. One writer asks what that scene was to God Himself.
… For the divine nature, what mattered was the horror of an earth corrupt and full of violence. It stands in contrast with Noah — a righteous man, blameless among his generations, walking with God when all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth.
Jesus said His return would come in days like Noah's. One writer uses that to test the hope of a world getting steadily better.
Remember the words of the Lord Jesus Christ: "Just as it was in the days of Noah, so will it be in the days of the Son of Man." Some would have us believe that this earth will be covered from pole to pole with a fair mantle of righteousness. They say this will happen before the Son of Man appears in the clouds of heaven. How was it in the days of Noah? Scripture replies, "the earth was filled with violence." "ALL flesh had corrupted their way on the earth." … "Righteousness" and "violence" are not very like each other.
The same two evils become questions for our own life.
These are the two great classes of sins that God had before Him when He said He would destroy the world by a flood. The world has not changed. If we are wronged or slandered, if we have personal grievances against others, what do we show? Is it a peaceful or a violent spirit? On the other hand, there is a moral corruption surrounding us, like the air we breathe.
- Root — corruption comes first: it is against God, and people think lightly of it.
- Fruit — violence is the visible proof of it; remove the corruption and the violence would not exist.
- Reach — corruption is toward God, violence toward people. The ruin reached the earth itself, material as well as moral.
- Restraint — God had set up no government yet. Lawless desire ran unchecked, and the man who warned them stood in danger.
- Repeat — the days of Noah are the pattern for the days of the Son of Man. The same two evils test our own spirit and desires.
And God looked upon the earth, and behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted its way on the earth.
God looks at the world before the flood, and His verdict is one word: ruined. Three questions follow — what "corrupt" means, whose way all flesh had corrupted, and what God does when the ruin covers everyone.
Genesis opened with God looking at His own work and calling it very good. One writer sets that scene beside this one and asks who has been at work since.
In Genesis 1 God was alone, producing the fruit of His own handiwork, in wisdom, goodness, and skill, and then all was good and desirable... But now it is not God's hand presenting a perfect work to God's thoughts and affections. It is man, the rebel workman, spreading out a wide scene of corruption and violence, for the grief and regret of the mind of God. That is where the secret of the change lies. Man has been at work. Man has been shaping and furnishing the scene, and not the living, blessed God.
The older wording says all flesh had corrupted "his way" — that is, God's way. The damage was not only in behaviour but in the earth itself.
Note this: corruption had affected the earth itself, for man had also corrupted God's way. The corruption was material as well as moral... Ever since sin came in, corruption has thrived and grown. Sadly, its willing victims rush to spread its terrible influence, driven by the sinful desires of body and mind. They are themselves "slaves of corruption," as the Scripture says (2 Peter 2:19).
The word behind "corrupt" explains why the ruin spread through everything.
We have to admit, sadly, how corrupt this world is. It touches every area, so everything is falling apart — for the word "corrupt" carries the thought of "decay and pining away."
The verse before this one pairs corruption with violence. One writer explains which of the two is worse, and how people rank them the other way round.
The passage then points to the most serious evil of man — his corruption before God — which led to an earth filled with violence (v. 11). Violence is of course against others, and people consider this the worst thing. But their corruption is against God, and they think little of it. If there were no corruption there would be no violence... God tells Noah that the end of all flesh was near, because the earth was filled with violence. Violence was the clear proof of man's corruption (v. 13).
The word "all" rules out any idea that judgment fell on the worst of society while better people survived on their own merits.
There must be the entire destruction of that which had corrupted God's way on the earth. "The mighty men, and men of renown," must all be swept away, without distinction. "All flesh" must be set aside, as completely unfit for God. God said, "I have determined to make an end of all flesh." It was not the end of some flesh only. No, all of it was corrupt in the sight of the LORD — all beyond recovery.
The verdict falls on nature, not just on conduct. So effort and polish change nothing.
There is nothing good at all in our sinful nature... But can diligent prayer and watchfulness improve it? No, never: it is completely incurable... True, in some we find nature polished, cultivated, and refined; in others, rough, rude and rugged. But it is the same sinful nature in both. We may not be able to bend a bar of iron, yet it can be hammered out until it is quite flexible. But it is the same iron still. Its appearance has changed, but its nature is the same.
The same passage that announces the end also gives the order to build. Commentators read the ark as a picture of Christ, and the flood as the end of the old order.
Here, then, was a picture of the end of the old creation. All was to pass under the waters of judgement. What then? "Make yourself an ark of gopher wood." Here we have a picture of the new thing. That ark, floating quietly over the dark depth of waters, was a picture of Christ, and of the believer in Him... It all hinges upon this one question. "Am I in or out of Christ?"
One writer also holds this scene up against what people expect the world to look like before Christ returns.
How was it in the days of Noah? Did righteousness cover the earth, as the waters cover the sea?... Scripture replies, "the earth was filled with violence." "All flesh had corrupted their way on the earth." "The earth was corrupt in God's sight." Well then, "so will it be in the days of the Son of Man."
- Corrupt — the word carries decay and wasting away. The ruin was moral and material, and man had corrupted God's way, not just his own.
- Cause — corruption toward God came first. The violence that shocks people was only its proof.
- Scope — "all flesh," not some. God swept away the famous and the brutal alike.
- Incurable — polish changes how the iron looks, never what it is. God does not improve that nature; He judges it.
- Ark — God announces the end, then names one shelter, a picture of Christ. The only question left is whether you are in Him or outside.
And God said to Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me, for the earth is full of violence through them; and behold, I will destroy them with the earth.
God speaks the sentence on a whole world to one man, and He gives His reason: the earth was full of violence. What does "all flesh" cover, why does God name violence, and why does the same speech that announces destruction also lead to an ark?
The verse names violence as the reason for the sentence. One writer looks under that violence, and separates what people notice from what God notices.
The most serious evil of man is his corruption before God, and it led to an earth filled with violence. Violence is of course against others, and people consider this the worst thing. But their corruption is against God, and they think little of it. If there were no corruption there would be no violence. But at this time "all flesh" had corrupted itself. God tells Noah that the end of all flesh was near because violence filled the earth. Violence was the glaring proof of man's corruption. God would destroy the people along with the earth.
Older translations read, "The end of all flesh is come before me," and the writers below quote that wording. The sentence covers everyone, not just the worst offenders. God keeps nothing back as still usable, and in the same breath He names His remedy.
The mighty men and the men of renown must all be swept away, without distinction. "All flesh" must be set aside as completely unfit for God. "The end of all flesh is come before me." This was not the end of some flesh only. No, all of it was corrupt in the sight of Jehovah — all of it beyond recovery. God had tried it and found it wanting. Then the Lord announces His remedy to Noah: "Make yourself an ark of gopher wood."
The word "end" marks a closed case, not just a coming disaster. One writer pictures the difference between a man awaiting trial and a man already condemned.
The end of man's time of testing has come before God. It is too late for man to ask for a new trial. He is guilty and under condemnation. It is too late for that poor young man, condemned to death, to talk of being tried again. He must be pardoned or executed. Such is man's condition. The prisoner may dream he is free, and hope to commit no more crimes — but he wakes for execution.
Before the flood arrives, God speaks. He tells Noah what He had already settled in His own heart, and the way He tells him matters as much as the news.
He dealt with him as a man deals with his friend, and as God deals with a chosen sinner. "The end of all flesh is come before Me," says the Lord to Noah, telling him what had been passing in His own heart. Later, on the day of the waters, He showed the same gracious friendship. When the ark was about to float on the scene of judgment, "the Lord shut him in." He did it with His own hand.
The flood does more than end the old world. The same waters lift the ark, and one writer sees the death of Christ in that.
The flood of waters that came, covering everything, so that the end of all flesh came, is a picture of the death of Christ. In His death God passed judgment on all flesh and carried it out. The waves and billows rolled over His innocent head. He passed through death and judgment for us and has made Himself our perfect ark, our hiding place. In Him we are lifted above the waters of judgment.
One writer takes this sentence beyond the flood. God does not improve the flesh, and only two places remain where He ends it.
There can be no purifying of the flesh. God has only one way to deal with it. As He said in Genesis 6, "The end of all flesh is come before me." He deals with it either at the Cross, where faith submits to the sentence, for God, "by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, ... condemned sin in the flesh" — or else in the lake of fire.
- Cause — Corruption toward God came first. The violence that filled the earth was its visible proof.
- Verdict — God ends all flesh, not just its worst examples. It was tried, found wanting, and beyond recovery.
- Closed case — Man's testing is over, not just going badly. Two options remain: pardon or execution.
- Friendship — God told Noah what had been passing in His own heart, and later shut him in with His own hand.
- Shelter — The waters that ended the old world carried the ark. Christ passed through that judgment and is Himself the hiding place. So the flesh meets its end at the Cross or in the lake of fire.
Make thyself an ark of gopher wood [with] cells shalt thou make the ark; and pitch it inside and outside with pitch.
God tells Noah how to survive the judgment He has just announced. The answer is a wooden ark with rooms inside, sealed with pitch — and that word for pitch is the word used elsewhere for atonement.
The judgment and the way out came from the same mouth. Noah's part was to believe both.
The Lord, in this way, provided Noah with an answer to His own righteous and purposed judgment that was coming on the world before the Flood. "Make yourself an ark of gopher wood," said God to him. Noah did so, believing the word both of judgment and of deliverance, and he was safe.
God spelled out the design, down to the rooms and the single door.
Yet the grace of God would provide a refuge for those who realized their need of His grace. God instructed Noah to make a large ark of gopher wood. It was six times as long as it was wide, with three decks and rooms built in, not only for people but for animals too, and covered with pitch inside and out (v. 14). One door is mentioned, which may seem inadequate for so large a ship, but it pictures the truth that Christ alone is the door of salvation for mankind.
No one can say for sure which tree gopher wood came from. But its name stands close to the name of the pitch.
The ark is built of gopher wood. We do not know this "gopher," but the name is very close to the "copher" or "pitch" named afterward... Because of this, the gopher has long been thought to be the cypress, which could well have supplied the "pitch" for the ark's seams. The picture would then fit even better. There is no doubt that the gopher, like the acacia wood of the tabernacle ark, refers to Christ, and "copher" is the word used elsewhere for "atonement." It was not enough that the tree be cut down to provide a refuge from the waters of judgment. The seams also had to be sealed with the pitch the tree supplied. And so death by itself, even Christ's death, would not have been enough to make safe the soul that fled to Him for refuge.
The pitch did more than keep the water out.
Now there was one very interesting feature in that ark. It was covered "inside and out with pitch." That was not only to make it watertight. It would do that, of course. But it was also to teach us a great truth, even if Noah did not understand. The word "pitch" in our translation is the same word translated "atonement" seventy times in the Old Testament. Only in this one place is it translated "pitch." It means a covering — a covering God ordained and provided for the man who had found grace in His eyes. Wherever Noah looked inside the ark, he saw this covering. Wherever God looked outside the ark, He saw the covering. Atonement within, atonement without.
Everyone in that generation ended up covered by something. What differed was the covering itself.
The waters of judgment fell upon the ark, but because it was covered, not one drop touched those inside... It is significant that the waters of judgment also covered the unbelievers, but there was no atonement in that covering.
God ordered the ark sealed. He also took charge of its one door.
Remember, the Lord's own hand shut Noah and his family in the ark (Gen. 7:16), which was made judgment-proof outside and inside (Gen. 6:14). God Himself secured the door. None could enter, and none could get out. "The Lord shut him in." God took charge of the door — safety — while Noah looked out of the window above — communion.
God gave this instruction to one man for one flood. What it pictures is already finished.
As a sinner there is nothing before you but judgment... But you may find a place of safety. You say, Where is it? You do not have to prepare an ark, because God has prepared one. Christ is the place of safety now. He bore all the judgment and the wrath, rose from the dead, and is now at God's right hand.
- Word — God announced the judgment and the remedy in one breath; Noah believed both and was safe.
- Wood — the tree had to be cut down to make the refuge, a picture of Christ; but timber alone would not hold back the waters.
- Pitch — the sealing word is the word for "atonement" seventy times elsewhere. Death alone was not enough. Atonement was needed.
- Within and without — Noah saw the covering inside, and God saw it outside. The same flood that covered the unbelievers left no drop on those in the ark.
- Door — one entrance, shut by God's own hand. It pictures the one place of safety already prepared, so no one today has an ark to build.
And thus shalt thou make it let the length of the ark be three hundred cubits, the breadth of it fifty cubits, and the height of it thirty cubits.
Here God gives Noah the exact size of the ark, a huge ship to build on dry land long before the flood came. Two questions follow: was it a real vessel of real size, and why did God draw up the plan Himself?
God gave the plan; Noah supplied the labour and the faith.
So Noah started his great work of preparing an ark to save his household. God was the Architect, so he had no need to worry about its design. His only concern must have been to carry out properly what God had designed. A single man receives a commission to build a gigantic ship, and apparently in the middle of dry land! It was an extraordinary command, and it must have called out faith of no ordinary kind in Noah.
A cubit means little today until you turn it into feet.
Its proportions were to be 300 cubits long, 50 cubits broad, and 30 cubits high. If the cubit is taken at 18 inches, its length would have been 450 feet, its breadth 75 feet and its height 45 feet. If the cubit used was 21 inches, the dimensions would be one-sixth larger.
Now compare the ark with the ships built since.
In the whole history of the world up to about a century ago, every other ship ever constructed was a mere shell compared with this. Only in quite recent years have these dimensions been surpassed. But what God said, Noah did, and he proved that God's command was his enabling.
One common objection says the ark was too small to hold the animals. The figures in this verse answer it.
The objection is that the ark was not big enough to "take in all the creatures" — more exactly, the animal races belonging to the dry land. It has been proved, over and over again, that it was. It has been calculated that it was a vessel of more than forty-two thousand tons. That is eighteen times as much as the largest warship. One warship can stow, say, a thousand men, with provisions, for a much longer time than the flood lasted, besides an immense weight of guns, shot and so on. So it is clear the ark could easily have received the animals that could not live in the water.
The ark's shape is unlike a ship built for speed. That is not a flaw.
The shape of the ark was not meant for sailing through storms and waves. But it suited exactly the purpose it was made for. Someone once built a freight ship in the same proportions, for use in quiet waters, and people declared it a great success.
Some treat the flood account as poetry or legend. This verse reads like a builder's brief.
Now it is of the greatest importance to stand firm and unbending in the faith. We are not dealing with poetry and its figures of speech. This is the language of sober history. It deals with facts, and with God's declaration about them… It is the plain and unvarnished statement of fact. The question is: are believers to accept the word of God without hesitation?
Noah's neighbours had every reason to think the plan absurd.
I do not suppose the men of the world thought it was built on the right lines. But he did not care one bit about that. God had given him the lines to build on (verses 14-16), so he did not care how they criticised his ark.
Notice also what the plan left out.
Noah's ship had no pump in it. Indeed it could not. Such a thing would have been a witness against it. It would mean that God's provision was not enough by itself. That could never be. He rested in the seaworthiness of his vessel because of God's appointment and approval of it — indeed, I may say, because of God's building of it. Faith kept his heart quiet about the judgment; hope filled it about the coming glory.
Commentators read the ark as a picture of Christ. The plan came from God, not from man.
It was entirely of God. He devised the ark, and gave Noah its specifications. The storm might rage, both above it and around it, but the ark was never submerged. "The ark floated on the face of the waters." A type of Him who bore the storm of divine wrath on behalf of all His people. The greatness of His person made Him equal to so mighty a work.
- Designed. God was the Architect and Noah the builder; the measurements came down as a command, not a suggestion.
- Measured. At an 18-inch cubit the ark was about 450 feet long, 75 broad and 45 high — unmatched by any ship until modern times.
- Ample. At over forty-two thousand tons, the ark had room to spare for every land animal.
- Factual. The passage reads as sober history, not poetry or legend, and asks whether we will take God's word as it stands.
- Trusted. Noah built on the lines God gave him and ignored the critics. He rested in a vessel God Himself designed — a picture of Christ, who bore the storm and was never submerged.
A light shalt thou make to the ark; and to a cubit high shalt thou finish it above. And the door of the ark shalt thou set in its side [with] a lower, second, and third [story] shalt thou make it.
God's last instructions for the ark sound purely practical: an opening for light, a door in the side, and three decks. Commentators read each detail two ways — as a building plan, and as a picture of how God saves.
The plan came from God; the work came from Noah. One writer explains why each feature sat where it did.
Noah was the builder but God was the Designer of the ark. The door was in the side, so people could get in easily. The window was above, to let in light from heaven and to shut out any view of the flood waters soon to come. Its dimensions were large. The cubit is reckoned to have been 18 to 22 inches long. The ark was made only to float, not shaped like a ship for travel, so its capacity must have been very great.
Another writer reads these instructions as plain fact, not as a story.
This is not poetry with its figures of speech. It is the language of sober history, dealing with facts and with God's declaration about them. It is the plain, unvarnished statement of fact.
One dictionary explains the Hebrew word here, and the question the cubit raises.
A window was to be made to the ark. Gen. 6:16. The word tsohar means "a place of light." It was probably set in the roof, and may have served for ventilation as well as for giving light. In Gen. 6:16, after speaking of the window, it says, "and finish it to a cubit above." Does this refer to the size of the window, or does the word "it" refer to the ark? It has been said that the word rendered "it" is feminine and cannot refer to "window," which is masculine. So the cubit may refer to the roof: the middle of the roof raised a cubit to give it a pitch.
Commentators differ on the exact form of the opening. One suggests a continuous gap running around the vessel:
It may be that the window "finished — to a cubit from the top" was an opening that encircled the whole ark, giving full ventilation, but able to be closed.
The window sat at the top, and that fixed where those inside could look.
The Lord secured the door with His own all-powerful hand. He left Noah the window. From it Noah could look upward to the place from which all the judgement had come, and see that no judgement remained for him. The saved family could only look upward, because the window was "above." They could not see the waters of judgement, nor the death and desolation which those waters had caused.
God carried them; they did not steer.
The passengers in that wonderfully guided and protected vessel did not need their eyes for steering. They were not to look out on the solemn scenes of the judgment taking effect around them. Meanwhile the waters, which were the grave of the world, floated them above its mountain-tops up to the blue heavens, growing calmer as they rose. What a time for them — shut in by God, with God! And what a preparation for the new life they were to begin in the world beyond the flood!
A ship that size might be expected to have several ways in.
One door is mentioned, which may seem too little for so large a ship, but it pictures the fact that Christ alone is the door of salvation for mankind.
Noah did not fasten himself in.
Remember the Lord's own hand shut Noah and his family in the ark, which was made judgment-proof outside and inside. God Himself secured the door. None could enter, and none could get out. "The Lord shut him in." God took charge of the door — safety — while Noah looked out of the window above — communion.
Commentators have seen growth in the three levels, though the shelter is equal on every floor.
It had rooms — varied ages, orders and families of salvation, but one Christ. It had three floors: that is, there is development in Christ — progress to higher and still higher levels. But clearly all who are "in Christ" have perfect salvation. That is no matter of degree or attainment. Salvation is as complete for the small timid animal creeping for refuge onto its lowest deck as for Noah on its topmost floor — no more and no less.
- Designed — God gave the plan; Noah gave the work. Every feature was God's choice, and the record reads as sober history, not poetry.
- Door — one entrance only, set in the side for easy access. It points to a single way of rescue. God shut it, and no one could open it.
- Light — the word means "a place of light," probably set in the roof. Commentators differ on whether the cubit measures the window or the pitch of the roof.
- Above — the opening faced upward, so those inside saw heaven, not the flood. The door was God's work; the window was theirs.
- Decks — three floors suggest growth in Christ. But the shelter is equal: the timid creature on the lowest deck is as safe as Noah on the top.
For I, behold, I bring a flood of waters on the earth, to destroy all flesh under the heavens in which is the breath of life everything that is on the earth shall expire.
God speaks to Noah before He acts, naming both what He will send and how far it will reach. It raises three questions. Whose act was this? How far did it reach? And why was it announced so long before it came?
God does not say the flood will simply happen. He says He Himself is bringing it. And He has given the same kind of warning about a judgment still to come.
God gave warning of the flood well in advance, and there was no doubt of its coming. It would destroy every living thing on earth (v. 17). In the same way, God has given advance warning of another judgment. He has appointed a day when He will judge the world by the Man He has ordained, the Lord Jesus Christ (Acts 17:31). Men may mock at this, but it will come just as surely as the flood came. It is not simply that God allowed it to come, but He insists, "I, even I am bringing the flood of water upon the earth."
(He quotes an older translation, where God's own "I" is doubled for emphasis.)
God often works in hidden ways behind the scenes. This judgment was not one of them.
The flood was not one of God's hidden works of providence, like the kind we see in the story of Esther. That story is important in itself, and we learn much from it. But the flood was a judgment God inflicted, and prophecy made it known beforehand. It was also worldwide. That set it apart from other times God stepped in, however real and instructive those were, and made it fit to compare with the days of the Son of man.
Years passed between God's word and the water. Noah spent them building, and the building itself was a warning.
Here we see the patience of God. He bore long with the sinners before the flood and gave them space to repent. Every day that Noah worked at the ark, every plank, every nail, every stroke of his hammer was a warning and a threat of the coming judgment. And more than that: God could do nothing until Noah was safe in the ark, after He Himself had shut him in.
The verse does not single out the worst offenders. Its terms take in everyone.
"The Lord said, I will destroy man." Nothing less would do. What had corrupted God's way on the earth had to be destroyed completely. "The mighty men, and men of renown" had to be swept away too, with no exceptions. "All flesh" had to be set aside as wholly unfit for God. "The end of all flesh is come before me." This was not the end of some flesh only. No — all of it was corrupt in the sight of the Lord, all of it past saving.
Some have read these words as covering only one region. One writer answers that they mean the whole earth.
I believe the flood covered the whole earth, wherever man was. There is no mistake about it. Some have questioned that, speaking in general terms, as if it only covered the inhabited earth. But Scripture says, "the mountains were covered," and "the tops of the mountains were seen," and so on. That sounds like the whole earth. Either way, you have to allow for a miracle... The flood's universality, complete universality, seems to me to be plainly meant, because it destroyed the world that existed then. God puts an end to the whole system of the world.
One writer reads the flood, and the ark riding above it, as a picture of the death of Christ.
The flood that came, waters covering everything so that the end of all flesh arrived, is a picture of the death of Christ. In His death God passed judgment on all flesh and carried it out. The waves and billows rolled over His innocent head. He passed through death and judgment for us and has made Himself our perfect ark, our hiding place. In Him we are lifted above the judgment waters.
- God brings it. The flood is not fate or nature acting alone. God says He Himself brings it. And He has fixed a day to judge the world by Christ.
- God announces it. God often works unseen. Not here. Prophecy announced this judgment before it fell, and its worldwide reach makes it the pattern of the day of the Son of man.
- God waits before it. Every plank and hammer stroke of the ark was a warning; the judgment could not fall until Noah was safely shut inside.
- God spares nothing in it. "All flesh" means all — not the worst sample of humanity, but the whole condition God had judged as unfit for Him.
- God provides through it. The waters that ended one world carried the ark above them. The death that fell on all flesh fell on Christ. He lifts everyone in Him above the judgment.
But with thee will I establish my covenant; and thou shalt go into the ark, thou, and thy sons, and thy wife, and thy sons' wives with thee.
God has just announced the end of all flesh. Now He makes a promise to one man and his household — a covenant given before a drop of rain fell.
God speaks this promise while the ark is still only an instruction. One writer notes where the word "covenant" first appears, and how the promise is filled out later.
"I will establish my covenant with you" had been God's word to Noah, before the ark was made, or the waters had come (Gen. 6:18). Now the judgment is past, and the new earth is inherited. So God sets that covenant out in full, and pledges it again, to His elect (Gen. 9:8-17). And it is here that the word "covenant" is first used.
The same writer weighs what the promise says about the earth's future.
"Everything that is on the earth shall die," says the Lord to him, "but I will establish my covenant with you." So He discloses the secret: God would establish the earth according to His own purpose, in resurrection, stability, and beauty.
The verse holds two settled decisions side by side, and the second is as firm as the first.
However, if God ordained judgment, He ordained salvation just as surely. God established a covenant with Noah to this effect: He would preserve Noah and his family by means of the ark. They were the only exception to the awesome destruction of man's civilization.
Knowing the outcome in advance did not spare Noah the years of work.
So God made His intention known to the man who believed Him. He would deliver Noah, his wife and his family in the way appointed. Carrying this out was a fitting and remarkable test of Noah's faith. It meant a long time of waiting, continuous labour, and entire but active submission to God's word. Noah kept two things before his spirit. First, the world was doomed, and judgment would fall on it at God's hand because of its wrongdoing. Second, he and his family would without doubt be sheltered from it in the ark, with the creatures needed to renew the world after the flood.
The shelter named here is not for Noah alone. His household enters on the strength of his faith, not their own.
The same ark that lay open to him lay open to them also. Why? Was it because they had faith? No; but because he had, and they were connected with him. God gave him a blank cheque for himself and his family, and it fell to him to fill it up by bringing them in along with him.
Translations differ over one word here. Some read "go into the ark." One writer defends "come," and finds the gospel in the difference.
God does not say, Go into the ark, but Come into the ark. He was "in Christ" (2 Cor. 5:19), and when He invites them to Christ, He invites them to Himself. When the storm-threatened traveller comes to make the divine Ark his refuge and home, he finds that Another is there to welcome him. God has made it His own retreat and tent… The word is altered to 'go' in a current translation of Genesis. I cannot see any ground for this needless change. It is true that boh is sometimes rendered 'go', when the context seems to require it. But in the vast majority of cases where it is used, it means 'come'.
The details of its build carry the meaning — a window above, and a single door.
The ark had a window above — looking towards Heaven and not upon the earth and its judgment beneath. It had one door and only one, in the side. All of it applies wonderfully to Christ and salvation. The flood of waters came and covered everything, so that the end of all flesh came. That flood is a picture of the death of Christ. In His death, sentence was passed on all flesh and carried out. The waves and billows rolled over His innocent head. He passed through death and judgment for us. He has made Himself our perfect ark, our hiding place. In Him we are lifted above the judgment waters.
- Covenant — Scripture's first covenant is spoken here, before the ark was built or the waters came. God sets it out in full after the flood.
- Purpose — Everything on the earth would die. Yet the promise held an earth established according to God's purpose — in resurrection, stability and beauty.
- Certainty — God ordained judgment. He ordained salvation just as surely. The ark was the one exception He had fixed.
- Household — The ark lay open to Noah's family because it lay open to him. His faith, not theirs, brought them in.
- Refuge — The call is "come," not "go." God made the ark His own dwelling, so the one who enters finds Another there. Christ is that ark now: He passed through judgment, and in Him we are lifted above the waters.
And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every [sort] shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep [them] alive with thee they shall be male and female.
God has announced the flood and ordered the ark; now He turns to its cargo — not just eight people, but a living sample of every kind of creature on earth. Why rescue animals from a judgment caused by human sin, and why two of each?
The name used for God in this chapter shapes the instruction. One writer says the order here is about the Maker keeping His creatures alive, not about His moral dealings with anyone.
So in Genesis 6 it says that "the earth was corrupt in God's sight, and the earth was filled with violence." It is not "Jehovah" now but "God." … What does He do then? He directs the ark to be made. For what end? The preservation of the creatures that needed the ark. So He orders that two of every kind should be taken into the ark. We can easily see how fitting this is. It is simply a measure for keeping the creature in being by God the Creator, despite the judgment about to fall. It has nothing to do with moral relationships. … Here, then, we only hear of pairs entering.
Genesis 7 tells Noah to take clean animals by sevens. Some critics call that a second, contradictory account. One writer answers that the twos and the sevens belong together in one text, under the two names for God found there.
When Jehovah is stating His thoughts about Noah, and giving His directions about His relationship with man and the earth, He tells Noah to take clean animals by sevens — still two and two, male and female. And they all go in two and two, as God had commanded. This ties the two names together in the text itself in a way that would make separating them difficult. The reason for distinguishing the clean animals (still two and two, male and female) is too obvious to cause the smallest difficulty. The twos refer, moreover, to male and female on a general principle. A person must be very hard pressed for a difficulty, or for a discovery, to find a contradiction here.
Gathering the pairs was part of a long assignment, with nothing to go on but God's word. Two settled convictions carried Noah through it.
Carrying this out was a fitting and remarkable test of Noah's faith. It involved a long wait, continuous labour, and complete but active submission to God's word. Noah kept two things before his spirit all the time. On the one hand, the world was doomed, and judgment would fall on it from God's hand because of its sins. On the other, he and his family would without doubt be sheltered from it in the ark, with the creatures needed to renew the world that would come after the flood.
The creatures aboard point beyond the flood itself.
The animals, clean and unclean, taken into the ark, along with the birds of the air, give us the hint that creation will share the blessed effects of salvation. The later prophetic word, and Romans 8:19-23, tell us of a coming deliverance of groaning creation.
Another writer goes further and uses the language of redemption.
Some of every sort are carried with Noah from the place of death into the ark of salvation. The "eight souls," as Peter calls them, but with them remnants of the animals of the earth, small and great, winged birds and creeping things — all are housed and redeemed together with Noah.
Critics said no ship could hold them all. One writer answers from the ark's own size.
It has been proved, over and over again, that the ark was big enough. People have calculated that it was a vessel of more than forty-two thousand tons: four hundred and fifty feet long, seventy-five broad, and forty-five high. That is eighteen times as much as the largest warship. One warship can stow, say, a thousand men, with provisions, for a far longer time than the flood lasted, besides an immense weight of guns and shot. So it is clear that the ark could easily have received the animals that could not live in the water.
Commentators read the ark as a picture of Christ. It carries its passengers through judgment into what lies beyond.
The ark is Christ, and the flood it saves through is the judgment of the whole world, which perished in it. Those preserved come through to a new world that emerges from the waters. There the sweet savour of accepted sacrifice secures lasting blessing.
- Creator. Here God acts as Maker. The pairs keep every kind alive through a judgment aimed at human sin.
- Command. Two of each, male and female, is the least life needs to continue. The sevens of chapter 7 serve another purpose. They are not a rival account.
- Carried. Two certainties carried Noah through the long wait: the world was doomed, and the ark would hold.
- Creation. The animals sheltered with Noah hint that creation itself will share in the deliverance promised in Romans 8.
- Comes through. Everyone inside comes out into a new world. The ark pictures Christ: in Him you pass through judgment rather than around it.
Of fowl after their kind, and of the cattle after their kind, of every creeping thing of the ground after its kind, two of each shall go in to thee, to keep [them] alive.
God's instructions to Noah move from building the ark to filling it. Noah does not hunt the animals down; they come in to him. Two questions sit inside the verse. Why did God save the animals at all? And why do the pairs here become sevens of the clean animals one chapter later?
Here God acts as Maker of the earth, not in moral dealings with a person. One writer ties the pairs to that.
Then what does He do? He directs the ark to be made. For what purpose? The preservation of the creatures that needed the ark. So He orders that two of every kind should be taken into the ark. We can easily see why this is fitting. It is simply a measure by God the Creator to keep the creature going, despite the judgment about to fall. It has nothing to do with moral relationships.
Readers often stumble at the different numbers given in Genesis 6 and Genesis 7. The difference tracks the two names of God used in the two passages, and the animals themselves settle the matter by entering in pairs.
In the accounts where Elohim gives directions for saving the different kinds of creatures, He directs that two of every sort be taken, male and female, to keep them alive. Nothing could be simpler than the meaning of this. Jehovah then states His thoughts about Noah, and gives His directions about His relationship with man and the earth. He tells Noah to take clean animals by sevens, still two and two, male and female. And they all go in two and two, as Elohim had commanded.
The animals move toward Noah. One writer turns that into a warning for people today.
From east, west, north, and south, the hand of God gathered the dumb creatures. The people must have thought it strange when those animals went in. They were wiser than men. They obeyed the call of God. Men would not then, and many will not now, so God says, "The ox knows its owner, and the donkey its master's crib, but Israel does not know, my people do not understand" (Isa. 1:3). These animals knew the call of their Creator, and they passed in safely, but man paid no attention.
The phrase looks past the flood. What enters the ark will renew the world after the flood. Noah had to hold that in mind through years of building.
Carrying this out was a fitting and remarkable test of Noah's faith. It meant a long wait, continuous labour, and complete but active submission to God's word. Noah kept two things constantly before his spirit. One: the world was doomed, and judgment would fall on it from God's hand because of its sins. The other: he and his family would without doubt be sheltered from it in the ark, with the creatures needed to renew the world that would come after the flood.
The creatures kept alive point past their own survival.
The animals, clean and unclean, taken into the ark, along with the birds of the air, hint that creation will share in the blessed effects of salvation. The later prophetic word, and Romans 8:19-23, tell us of a coming deliverance for groaning creation.
One writer reads the ark that held them all as a picture of something greater.
For plainly, the ark is Christ, and the flood it saves through is the judgment of the whole world, which perished in it. Those preserved come through to a new world which rises out of the waters. There the sweet aroma of accepted sacrifice secures lasting blessing.
- Creator. The pairs are God acting as Maker, keeping every kind alive through the coming judgment.
- Call. The creatures are not captured but come; they answered the call of their Creator when men would not.
- Count. Two here, sevens of the clean later. That is not a contradiction. Elohim, the Creator, orders the pairs; Jehovah, dealing with Noah in relationship, names the sevens.
- Continuity. "To keep them alive" means the ark carried the seed of the world to come. Noah's long labour was faith holding onto that.
- Christ. Writers read the ark as a figure of Christ. The flood falls, the vessel rises, and everything inside — man and creature alike — reaches a new world.
And take thou of all food that is eaten, and gather [it] to thee, that it may be for food for thee and for them.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And Noah did it; according to all that God had commanded him, so did he.
Genesis 6 ends with judgment announced and an ark measured out in detail. Nothing here tells us how Noah felt about the task — only that he did what God said, and did all of it.
Nothing in the world around Noah supported what he had been told. The word itself held him steady.
All that the man of faith needs is to know that God has spoken; this imparts perfect certainty to his soul. "Thus says the Lord" settles everything. A single line of Sacred Scripture is a full answer to all the reasonings and all the imaginations of the human mind. When someone has the word of God as the basis of his convictions, he can stand calmly against the full tide of human opinion and prejudice. It was the word of God which sustained the heart of Noah during his long course of service. How could Noah have preached righteousness for 120 years if he had not had the word of God as the ground of his preaching? How could he have withstood the scoffs and sneers of an unbelieving world? How could he have kept on testifying of a judgment to come, when not a cloud appeared on the world's horizon? Impossible.
The plan came with the command. That left Noah with only one concern.
So Noah started on his great work of preparing an ark to save his household. God was the Architect, so Noah did not need to worry about its design. His only concern must have been to carry out rightly what God had designed. A single man receives a commission to build a gigantic ship, and that, it seems, in the middle of dry land! … But what God said, Noah did, and he proved that God's command was his enabling.
The verse says it twice: Noah did it, and he did all of it. His response matches the instructions in every detail.
The great thing to notice in Noah, warned of the coming catastrophe, is his simple obedience to the voice of God. God gave the dimensions of the ark — the window, the door, and the different decks. Noah made every part of it exactly as God commanded.
That obedience has a root. It grows out of faith, and it runs the opposite way to a life steered by sight.
In Hebrews 11 we find the principle of his walk. It was faith, not sight… It was faith working holy obedience — "Noah did this; he did all that God commanded him." How simple, how blessed, and how opposite to the walk by sense and sight! That walk leads us in self-will to do the very thing God commanded not to be done.
This was not a single decision. He had to take the task up again every morning, while nothing in the sky changed.
Carrying this out was a fitting and remarkable test of Noah's faith. It meant a long time of waiting, continuous labour, and complete but active submission to God's word. Noah kept two things before his spirit at all times. One was that the world was doomed, and that judgment would fall on it at God's hand because of its sins. The other was that he and his family would beyond doubt find shelter from it in the ark.
Doing all that God commanded also meant looking absurd for the whole stretch of it.
Faith here for a hundred and twenty years seemed to be a fool. Noah was building a ship for dry ground. His neighbours may well have mocked him. But he saw the thing that was invisible.
The command was not a burden laid on Noah for its own sake.
He had only to build an ark according to God's command. He would soon find he was building something for his own safety. Obedience was his blessing.
For readers now, the shelter is not one we construct.
Noah's faith recognised that the world was a judged scene… Noah prepared an ark for the saving of his house. We do not have to prepare an ark. But we have to accept the shelter of the death of Christ, and the end of all flesh before God. Then we find how the power of God's salvation carries us through a judged scene.
- God spoke. "Thus says the Lord" settled everything for Noah. The word, not the weather, was the ground he stood on.
- God designed. God was the Architect of the ark. Noah's one concern was to build exactly what God had designed — and God's command was his enabling.
- Noah did all. Window, door, decks, dimensions: he made every part exactly as God commanded. Faith working holy obedience — the opposite of walking by sight.
- Noah kept doing. For a hundred and twenty years he waited, worked and submitted. The neighbours laughed at a ship on dry ground.
- Noah was saved. He built for God and found he had built his own safety — obedience was his blessing. We build nothing; we take shelter in the death of Christ.