Simeon and Levi are brethren Instruments of violence their swords.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
My soul, come not into their council; Mine honour, be not united with their assembly; For in their anger they slew men, And in their wantonness houghed oxen.
Jacob, near death, does something you would not expect in a blessing: he pulls his own soul back from two of his sons. His words look back to a massacre at Shechem, and they raise a hard question — what does a father do when his sons kill in the family's name?
His words point back to a crime recorded earlier in Genesis, where the two brothers killed every man in a city.
L. M. GrantThese two brothers are considered together, and united in cruelty and violence. Nothing good is said about them at all. Jacob refused to be identified with them in their rampage of murder, driven by their bitter anger. He refers to their slaughter of all the men in the city of Hamor and Shechem.
The brothers had a defence ready: they were avenging their sister. Jacob does not accept the trade — the honour they claimed to protect was not the honour they damaged. Where the ESV says "my glory," older translations read "my honour," and the writers below use that older wording.
F. B. HoleTheir father never forgot their cruel and violent action, recorded in Genesis 34. He separated himself from it. They claimed to be avenging their sister's honour. But Jacob would not join his honour to what they did, and he condemned it as the fruit of their anger.
Their revenge wore a religious cover. One writer sees a verdict here on cruelty done in God's name, and points to the ox as proof that the harm spread beyond the guilty.
The Bible TreasuryThey band together and deceive, as religious bigotry always does, but every truly religious man will echo Jacob's rejection of it. The innocent suffer with the guilty in these cursed crusades — the innocent ox with the guilty Shechem — and Shechem was not half as bad as they were. The worst part of this crime is that they do it in the name of God, of religious order and separation. So they make thoughtless people hate religion, and they manage to wrong the world and the church at the same time.
Commentators differ over the last phrase. The ESV reads "hamstrung oxen." Others keep the older reading, "they dug down a wall," and admit the text is uncertain.
F. B. HoleThe last clause of verse 6 is unclear, because the reading is not certain. But take it as it stands: "they dug down a wall." We may apply this to their murder of their Messiah and Deliverer. In killing Him they destroyed their own separated position, and so dug down the wall of protection that had been theirs.
Jacob is not just a shocked bystander. He chose to settle at Shechem himself, and one writer sees the sons finishing what their father began.
J. G. BellettIn the end he sees what all this really was — the fruit of his living at Shechem. In self-will a man had been killed there, and a fence thrown down. But Jacob himself had dug down God's fence before. The call of God had raised a wall between the clean and the unclean, between the Jew and the Gentile. Jacob himself, in spirit, had broken that wall down when he settled as a citizen or landowner on his purchased estate at Shechem.
Jacob would not enter their council. Neither could God. Yet Levi's own tribe ended up carrying the holy vessels of the tabernacle.
C. H. MackintoshHow striking the language is! God could not come into Levi's council, or join his company. That was impossible. God could have nothing to do with self-will, fierceness, and cruelty. Yet He could bring Levi into His own council, and join him to His company. He could take him out of his home, where the instruments of cruelty were. He could bring him into the tabernacle to handle the holy instruments and vessels there. This was grace — free, sovereign grace. Here we must look for the basis of all Levi's blessed and high service.
Nature and grace tied Levi to two opposite covenants.
C. H. MackintoshBy nature he was "joined" in a covenant of murder; by grace "joined" in a covenant of "life and peace." The former, because he was "fierce and cruel"; the latter, because he feared and was afraid of the Lord's name.
- United in evil. Jacob judges the brothers as a pair because they acted as a pair. He saw only cruelty and violence, and refused to be identified with them.
- Refused union. They said they were defending their sister's honour. Jacob refused to tie his own honour to what their anger produced.
- Religion as cover. Their revenge came dressed as religion, and the innocent suffered with the guilty. Violence done in God's name wrongs the world and the church at once.
- Fence dug down. Writers differ on the last line: "hamstrung oxen" or "dug down a wall." On the older reading, Jacob's own move to Shechem had already broken God's fence down.
- Joined by grace. God could not enter Levi's company, but He could bring Levi into His own. By nature Levi was joined to a covenant of murder; by grace, to a covenant of life and peace, and to holy service.
Cursed be their anger, for it [was] violent; And their rage, for it [was] cruel! I will divide them in Jacob, And scatter them in Israel.
Jacob's last words to Simeon and Levi are the harshest in the chapter. There is no blessing here — only a curse on their anger and a sentence of scattering. The words look back to the killings in Genesis 34. They also look forward to what God would do with two tribes under their father's judgment.
The sentence has a history. Levi's first recorded act in Scripture is not a service but a slaughter.
Michael HardtThe first action of Levi that the Scriptures record is an act of cruelty. Levi was one of Jacob's twelve sons. Excessive wrath drove him, and he acted in a deceitful way. Read the account in Genesis 34: "Simeon and Levi... took their swords and came against the city while it felt secure and killed all the males" (Gen. 34:25). Jacob had to say: "You have brought trouble on me" (Gen. 34:30). This is why, later, the blessing of the tribe of Levi was turned into a curse.
The brothers had a defence ready. Jacob answers the deed, not the excuse behind it.
F. B. HoleSimeon and Levi come next. Their father never forgot their cruel and violent action, recorded in Genesis 34. He dissociated himself from it. They claimed to be avenging the honour of their sister. But Jacob would not join his own honour to what they did, and he denounced it as the fruit of their anger.
The two had acted as one. The punishment answers that partnership.
L. M. GrantThese two brothers are considered together, and united in cruelty and violence... Then comes a prophetic sentence: "I will divide them in Jacob and scatter them in Israel." Their unity in evil would result in division even among the tribes.
The same sentence fell on both brothers. Grace did not do the same thing with each of them.
H. L. RossierAs a consequence of Simeon and Levi's sin, these two brothers were "divided in Jacob and scattered in Israel" (Gen. 49:7). However, they differed from each other. In grace the Lord used Levi's dispersion to give him priestly functions suited to his position. It was otherwise for Simeon, who continued to bear the mark of God's judgment... Simeon was small in number. His land lay partly inside Judah's territory, was open to enemy attacks on the south, and had no definite borders.
The most striking thing about this verse is what God later did with it. The scattering stayed; its meaning changed.
The Bible TreasuryIt may be instructive to compare the case of Levi as an instance of God making His judgment an occasion of blessing. Genesis 49:7 says, "I will divide them in Jacob and scatter them in Israel." But in Deuteronomy 33:10 we see Him overrule that dividing and scattering. It made them teach "Jacob your rules, and Israel your law" more effectively. "Where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."
The change went deeper than Levi's duties. Grace reversed every mark that nature had left on him.
C. H. MackintoshBy nature he was "joined" in a covenant of murder; by grace "joined" in a covenant of life and peace... By nature Levi was familiar with the instruments of cruelty; by grace, with the instruments of God's tabernacle. By nature God could not come into Levi's assembly; by grace, Levi is brought into God's assembly.
Jacob is not only settling an old family score. Some writers read this fierce anger as a preview of something far larger.
F. B. HoleIt refers, we believe, to that terrible outbreak of anger and cruelty in the nation, which reached its climax in the rejection and death of Christ. Stephen speaks of Him as "the Righteous One," in contrast to the sinful men killed by Simeon and Levi. He added, "whom you have now betrayed and murdered" (Acts 7:52). Strikingly enough, Simeon and Levi achieved their murderous intent by a preliminary act of betrayal.
The verse also speaks to daily life. Anger that stays does not stay harmless.
A. PridhamAnger is allowed in a believer, but it must not become a settled feeling... There is a holy indignation. The sight of shameless evil may stir it, and it is far from private hostility... When harboured as a lasting sentiment, it is sin; and in its results it is nearer to cursing than to blessing.
- Deed — Levi's first recorded act is a deceitful massacre (Genesis 34), and Jacob never forgot it.
- Denounced — Jacob refuses to own the act; avenging their sister does not excuse the anger behind it.
- Divided — brothers who acted as one are split apart; the sentence mirrors the partnership.
- Diverged — Levi's scattering became priestly service; Simeon stayed small, with no borders of his own.
- Overruled — God turned the scattering into teaching and priestly service, so where sin increased, grace abounded all the more.