Genesis 44:4–5

Genesis 44:4

They were gone out of the city, [and] not [yet] far off, when Joseph said to him who was over his house, Up! follow after the men; and when thou overtakest them, thou shalt say to them, Why have ye rewarded evil for good?

The brothers had left Egypt with full sacks and light hearts, sure that this second journey had gone well. They were barely out of sight of the city when Joseph sent a rider after them with a charge of paying back evil for good — over a cup Joseph himself had put in Benjamin's sack.

The charge that overtakes them

One writer traces what happens next:

However, this relief was short lived. Joseph had told his steward to overtake them and accuse them of returning evil for good in stealing Joseph's silver cup (vv. 4-5). Of course such an accusation was a shock to the brothers. They protested that they would not think of such a thing.

L. M. Grant

The purpose behind the planted cup

The pursuit is not revenge. It is a deliberate probe, aimed at what is still unhealed in the men:

Joseph, who pictures Christ, was here to carry out the probe needed to clear away all the past wrong, and to form a new heart and a new spirit in his brothers. It was for God's sake and their sakes, not his own. He wanted the reality and the evidence of a divine work in their conscience and heart. This is why the cup went into Benjamin's sack.

William Kelly

Recorded, not recommended

A false charge is a hard way to reach a conscience. One writer weighs the motive and the method separately:

The trial was severe, yet love directed it in the fear of God. Even so, we may feel that the way he chose was in no way what the New Testament would suggest to the Christian… Joseph acted according to his measure, weakened no doubt by the Egyptian life around him. Scripture tells us the facts as they were, without approval or apology.

William Kelly

Innocent of the cup, guilty of the brother

The charge is false, and that is what makes it work. The brothers could have defended themselves and taken offence. Instead the old sin surfaced:

They were innocent, indeed, about the cup. But this means nothing to their consciences… They had been called spies when they were true men. Now they were treated as common thieves, though they were honest men. They might have said this was too bad… But no — nothing of this — that was not the way of Joseph's brothers now. They had once hidden their guilt under the lie they sent to their father. Now they are willing to hide their innocence about the cup under the confession they make to Joseph.

J. G. Bellett

Back at the field of Dothan

The same writer weighs what this moment asks of them:

But this, simple as it seems, is the crisis… Will the sorrows of Benjamin move them, as the cries of Joseph once failed to do? Will the grief of the aged father at home plead with their heart, as once it did not? This place, this moment, was the field of Dothan again. They were returning, in spirit, to the place where all their offence was committed.

J. G. Bellett

Exposed before he is revealed

Joseph does not make himself known yet. He sends a steward with a charge instead. One writer sees a set order here:

However, before Joseph can be revealed to them they must be exposed before Joseph. To this end Joseph's cup is placed in Benjamin's sack. After they leave, Joseph's steward chases them and charges them with taking the cup. They protest their innocence.

Hamilton Smith

Another writer carries the same order forward to Israel:

Notice only that here repentance is tied directly to the rejection of Joseph. This is brought home to the conscience of Joseph's brothers. So in the end it will be with Israel. It is not a matter of the law here — that comes after Sinai — but of the Messiah, whom Joseph pictures. Their consciences are fully convinced, and they go back over all the circumstances of his rejection. It is only gradually that Joseph reveals himself, and with many exercises of heart, which his dealings work in his brothers.

J. N. Darby

Summary

- Charge. Joseph's steward overtakes them just outside the city and accuses them of returning evil for good. The charge shocks them, and they protest that they would never do such a thing.

- Probe. The cup in Benjamin's sack was a deliberate test. It was meant to form a new heart and spirit in the brothers, for God's sake and theirs, not Joseph's.

- Honesty. Love directed the trial. Yet the method is not what the New Testament would suggest to a Christian. Scripture reports the facts without approval or apology.

- Memory. The false charge carries them back, in spirit, to the field of Dothan. Will Benjamin's sorrow move them where Joseph's cries did not?

- Revelation. Exposure comes before disclosure. The brothers must be exposed before Joseph reveals himself, and Israel will one day repent the same way over the Messiah it rejected.

Genesis 44:5

Is not this [it] in which my lord drinks, and in which indeed he divines? Ye have done evil [in] what ye have done.

The steward says the missing cup is the one his master drinks from and uses to read hidden things. Yet Joseph had ordered that cup hidden in Benjamin's sack himself. So did Joseph practice divination, and what did he want from such a charge?

A Trap Joseph Set Himself

Joseph arranged the whole thing in advance. His aim was not punishment. He wanted a change of heart in men who had never faced what they had done.

Joseph's wisdom now shows itself in a way that leads his brothers to repentance without accusing them. He told his steward to fill their sacks with food and to put his own silver cup into the mouth of Benjamin's sack. The next morning they were on their way, no doubt glad that this time everything had gone so well.

L. M. Grant

"By This He Practices Divination"

One commentator doubts that Joseph used enchantments at all. He also rejects the idea that the cup was there to test the brothers' feelings.

In the first place, it would be hard to make me believe that Joseph used enchantments at all. That is the thought here in divining. I have very little doubt that Joseph was hiding his true self from them. He gave them the impression that he knew the magic arts of the Egyptians, and was simply an Egyptian lord. But I have no pronounced opinion on the subject. In the second place, the cup was not used to reach his brothers' affections. It was a means of reaching their consciences. The Lord will deal with the nation of Israel in this same way when He takes them up again. He will bring them to admit their guilt in rejecting Him.

James Boyd

Commentators differ here, and this one says plainly that he holds no settled opinion.

The Man Who Can Certainly Divine

Under Joseph's questions the brothers stop hiding. Being fully known is what makes a person at home in the Lord's presence. The writer below quotes an older translation of verse 15, where the ESV reads "practice divination."

Under the searching questions of Joseph the whole truth is confessed. Joseph can say, "What deed is this that you have done?" "Do you not know that such a man as I can certainly make trial?" And this is ever the way grace takes. That is how the Lord dealt with a sinful woman "near the field that Jacob had given to his son Joseph." "Go, call your husband" was only another way of saying, "What deed is this that you have done?" He made Himself known to that guilty sinner as the One who can "certainly divine," for she said, "He told me all that I ever did." And no one can be happy and at home in the presence of the Lord of glory until they have learnt that the Lord knows the very worst thing about them — and yet loves them.

Hamilton Smith

Recorded, Not Approved

One writer grants that the method belonged to Joseph's setting and his limits. It is not a standard for us to copy.

Severe as the trial was, love dictated it in the fear of God. Still, we may feel that the method he chose was in no way what the New Testament would suggest to a Christian. Joseph acted up to the measure he had, weakened no doubt by the Egyptian life around him. Scripture tells us the facts as they were, without approving them and without excusing them.

William Kelly

The purpose was not cruelty or revenge. The same writer weighs the cost against the outcome.

He did it for God's sake and for their sakes, and not for his own. He wanted a real work of God in their conscience and heart, and the evidence of it. This dictated the cup in Benjamin's sack. No doubt the shock of finding it there deeply troubled the brothers. But that is how it must be when sin of the deepest kind lay at the bottom of it all. The cup was only a means to make them feel that sin and judge it. After all, the pain of the means employed was very brief... and the same day followed with forgiveness and joy and tender love.

William Kelly

Slavery Faced, Then Relief

The charge sets in motion the very doom the brothers once handed to Joseph. Judah takes it on himself instead of escaping it.

They were horror-stricken when the search found the cup in Benjamin's sack. All turned back to Egypt, and now Judah, to save Benjamin, volunteers to be the slave in his place. He faces the very doom to which he had consigned Joseph. When they reached that point, relief came... He had dealt wisely with them.

C. E. Stuart

Summary

- Planted — Joseph ordered the cup hidden, so the charge is a planned test, not a real theft.

- Disguise — The talk of divining fits Joseph's cover as an Egyptian lord. One commentator doubts he used enchantments at all.

- Conscience — Joseph aimed the cup at their conscience, not their feelings. It exposes the brothers before it comforts them.

- Known — The One who can divine already knows the worst about us. No one is at home in His presence until they learn that He knows it and still loves them.

- Relief — Judah offers to take the slavery he once handed to Joseph. That same day the pain gives way to forgiveness and love.