And he commanded him who was over his house, saying, Fill the men's sacks with food, as much as they can carry; and put every man's money in the mouth of his sack.
Joseph, now ruler in Egypt, has just eaten with the brothers who sold him years earlier, and none of them know who he is. Before they leave, he gives his steward a private order about their sacks. The kindness in that order is the opening move of a test.
The order is all about giving: full sacks, and each man's money slipped back where he will find it. Commentators read this as planned strategy, not sentiment.
Joseph now shows his wisdom in a way that leads his brothers to repentance without accusing them. He told his steward to fill the brothers' sacks with food and put their money back in their sacks again (v. 1). But he also tells him to put his own silver cup into the mouth of Benjamin's sack. The next morning they were on their way, no doubt glad that this time everything had gone so well.
The brothers had already felt their guilt over Joseph. So why put them through more?
Their consciences had already been stirred, as we saw when reading Genesis 42:21, but the work of repentance needed to go deeper still. So Joseph deals with them further in Genesis 44.
The aim was not only to expose the old crime but to find out what they had become.
In God's moral government the brothers had to be searched even more thoroughly. Joseph is His instrument in devising a still harder test. It was meant not only to carry their self-judgment as far as it could go, but also to prove that their love for their father and their brother was now real and warm — after they had once been so deeply guilty toward both. In this way love joined righteousness in working for their best good.
This is the second time their money goes back into the sacks. The first time, it did not produce thanks. It frightened them.
But Joseph followed up what he had begun. He directed that each man's money go back into his own sack. He wanted to deepen the work in them, past a mere sense of payback for the evil they had done to him. Food for the journey alone might not have had that effect. But money given back would strike them as nothing like an ordinary sale or an ordinary human act… A bad conscience brought God before them. Why else would this ruler act so kindly — a man who suspected they were spies, held one brother in custody, and firmly demanded the one son their father loved so dearly?
One writer sees in that reaction a picture of how people still respond to unearned kindness from God.
Both they and their father were afraid instead of thankful, because they suspected some hidden motive behind it. People are generally like this. They suspect there must be some "catch" when the free grace of God in Christ Jesus is preached.
The verse names the steward, but the plan is not his.
The chief steward did that which his lord told him to do. He had no authority to exercise his own judgment.
The shock ahead was real. But the writers weigh it against both its purpose and its length.
Joseph, a picture of Christ, was here to carry out the probing that was needed. It would clear away all the past wrong and form a new heart and a new spirit in his brothers… After all, the pain of the method used was very short — no more than a few hours, compared with what Joseph himself drank so deeply for years. And the same day brought forgiveness, joy and tender love.
These chapters carry more than family history. They sketch how God brings people to repentance, and how He will deal with Israel.
In Genesis 42 to 44, Joseph's brothers picture the twelve tribes of Israel (including Judah) in their future restoration, when they will be brought to accept the rejected but true Joseph. Their story also brings to light certain principles about the work of restoration and about what true repentance is.
- Full sacks. Joseph's order gives them more than they asked for: food to the brim and their money back. All of it aims at their hearts.
- Hidden hook. The same delivery that fed them carried the test. It would lead them to repentance without a word of accusation.
- Uneasy grace. Unearned kindness frightens a guilty conscience. People still suspect a catch when God offers free grace.
- Deeper work. Regret had already surfaced in chapter 42. Repentance had to go deeper before Joseph could reveal himself.
- Short pain. The distress lasted hours; Joseph had borne years. Forgiveness and love came the same day.
And put my cup, the silver cup, in the mouth of the sack of the youngest, and his grain-money. And he did according to the word of Joseph which he had spoken.
Joseph feasts his brothers and sends them home with full sacks. But he has his steward hide his own silver cup in the youngest brother's sack, and that raises the hardest question in the story: why does a man who loves his brothers set a trap for them?
Joseph never confronts his brothers with what they did to him twenty years earlier. He arranges the sacks so that they arrive at it themselves.
Joseph now shows his wisdom in a way that leads his brothers to repentance without accusing them. He told his steward to fill their sacks with food and put their money back in the sacks again. On top of that, he tells him to put his own silver cup in the mouth of Benjamin's sack. The next morning they were on their way, no doubt rejoicing that this time everything had gone so well.
Joseph already knows who they are and longs to tell them who he is. One thing stands in the way, and the hidden cup is aimed at it.
He will give them a feast, but in such a way that they cannot help seeing that their history is known… But before Joseph can reveal himself to them, they must be exposed before Joseph. That is why Joseph's cup is put in Benjamin's sack.
The cup goes into one sack only — the youngest brother's. That puts the brothers back where they stood years before: a favoured younger brother about to be lost, and the rest free to walk away.
This place, this moment, was the field of Dothan again. In spirit they were going back to the place where they had committed the whole offence. In the field of Dothan, in Gen. 37, they had to answer this: would they sacrifice their innocent brother Joseph to their lusts, their envy and their malice? Now Benjamin is claimed as a prisoner because of the cup found in his sack — claimed as one who has forfeited his life and liberty to the lord of Egypt. In the same way the question is put to them: would they sacrifice him too, and go on home, easy and careless and satisfied?
Nobody stole anything. That is the point: the charge they cannot answer is not the one the steward brings.
Joseph's silver cup was in one of their sacks, so they had to come back… Tell me, what iniquity was there in relation to the cup? None; but it served to rouse conscience. It brought up the twenty pieces of silver, and the wickedness of their history in days gone by.
Why a cup? In the ancient world a ruler's cup carried a meaning of its own.
The cup is a symbol of a verdict: the ruler of the feast decided who received it, in what order, and what it held… A judging or "divining cup" was a common thing among ancient peoples, and Joseph points to that idea in Gen. 44:15. Now this cup may hold either happiness or condemnation.
Did Joseph really use the cup for divining? One writer doubts it.
It would be hard to make me believe that Joseph used magic at all, and that is the idea behind divining here. I have very little doubt that Joseph was hiding who he really was. He gave them the impression that he was skilled in the magic arts of the Egyptians, and was nothing other than an Egyptian lord… He did not use the cup to reach his brothers' affections, but as a way of reaching their consciences.
Joseph's motive and Joseph's method are two different things.
Severe as the trial was, love prompted it in the fear of God. Still, we may feel that the method he used was in no way what the New Testament would suggest to a Christian… Joseph acted according to his own measure, weakened no doubt by the Egyptian life that surrounded him. Scripture tells us the facts as they were, without approving them or excusing them… And the steward knew well what his master intended.
The ordeal did not last long.
This is what led to the cup in Benjamin's sack. No doubt the shock of finding it there deeply troubled the brothers… After all, the pain of the method used was very short, and the same day brought forgiveness, joy and tender love.
- Hidden: the cup goes in secretly. Joseph wants to lead his brothers to repentance, not accuse them.
- Placed: it goes into Benjamin's sack. The youngest and best-loved son is now at risk — Dothan all over again.
- False: they never stole the cup. The charge is empty, and that is what makes it reach their real guilt.
- Exposed: Joseph stays hidden until their guilt is out in the open.
- Brief: the pain lasts hours, and forgiveness, joy and tender love follow the same day.
In the morning, when it was light, the men were sent away, they and their asses.
At daybreak the brothers leave Egypt with full sacks, sure that all has gone well this time. They do not know about the silver cup hidden in Benjamin's sack, and that quiet departure opens the hardest test they will ever face.
Joseph had already set his plan in motion before they rode away.
Joseph's wisdom now shows itself in a way that leads his brothers to repentance without accusing them. He told his steward to fill the brothers' sacks with food and again put their money back in their sacks (v. 1). But besides this he tells him to put his own silver cup in the mouth of Benjamin's sack. The next morning they were on their way, no doubt rejoicing that this time everything had gone so well.
Why would a man who loves these men put them through this? One writer says the test served God's own purpose for them.
God's moral government required that the brothers be searched even more deeply. Joseph is His instrument, and he plans a still harder test. It was not only to carry their self-judgment through to the very end. It was also to prove that their love for their father and their brother was now real and warm, after their deep guilt toward both of them long ago. Love joined righteousness in working this way for their best good.
Commentators differ on the method itself. Kelly defends Joseph's aim, yet he says the method is no model for a believer today:
The trial was severe, but love chose it in the fear of God. Still, we may feel that the method he used was in no way what the New Testament would suggest to a Christian… Joseph acted according to his own measure of light, weakened no doubt by the Egyptian life around him. Scripture tells us the facts as they were, without approving them and without excusing them.
The road they take that morning leads them back to an old scene. The same pieces are in place: Benjamin in danger, and a father at home who will grieve.
Joseph's cup is put in Benjamin's sack… and they set out on their journey. Simple as it seems, this is the crisis. Their own lips will now have to give the verdict, for the question is about to be put to them: are they what they once were, or have they received a heart of flesh? Will Benjamin's sorrows move them, when Joseph's cries once failed to? Will the grief of their old father at home plead with their hearts, as it once did not? This place, this moment, was the field of Dothan again. In the field of Dothan they had to answer whether they would sacrifice their innocent brother Joseph to their lusts, their envy and their malice.
Joseph could have ended the suspense at any moment. He restrained himself, and the restraint was itself love.
Joseph speaks kindly to them. He longs in love over his younger brother. He weeps in love in secret. But he holds himself back in love, because love's time to show itself has not yet come… While they enjoy all this favour, "they drank and were merry with him." Yet they must learn other lessons before he can be merry with them. They are rejoicing in his gifts, but they have yet to rejoice in him… Before Joseph can be revealed to them, they must first stand exposed before Joseph. That is why Joseph's cup is placed in Benjamin's sack.
The distress of that day was real. It was also short.
No doubt the shock of finding it there troubled the brothers sharply. But it had to be so, where sin of the deepest kind lay behind everything. This was only a way to make that sin truly felt and judged. And the pain of the method was very short — no more than a few hours, next to what Joseph drank so deeply for years — and that same day ended in forgiveness, joy and tender love.
- Sent — The brothers leave at daybreak, sure all is well. They do not know that the cup in Benjamin's sack has turned the journey home into a test.
- Searched — Joseph never accuses them. He arranges things so that they accuse themselves and judge their own sin to the full.
- Staged — Benjamin in danger, an old father waiting at home: it is the field of Dothan again, and this time their own lips must give the verdict.
- Silent — Love holds back. They enjoy his gifts but do not yet know him, and he will not show himself until they stand exposed before him.
- Short — The pain lasted hours, not years, and that very day ended in forgiveness, joy and tender love.
They were gone out of the city, [and] not [yet] far off, when Joseph said to him who was over his house, Up! follow after the men; and when thou overtakest them, thou shalt say to them, Why have ye rewarded evil for good?
The brothers had left Egypt with full sacks and light hearts, sure that this second journey had gone well. They were barely out of sight of the city when Joseph sent a rider after them with a charge of paying back evil for good — over a cup Joseph himself had put in Benjamin's sack.
One writer traces what happens next:
However, this relief was short lived. Joseph had told his steward to overtake them and accuse them of returning evil for good in stealing Joseph's silver cup (vv. 4-5). Of course such an accusation was a shock to the brothers. They protested that they would not think of such a thing.
The pursuit is not revenge. It is a deliberate probe, aimed at what is still unhealed in the men:
Joseph, who pictures Christ, was here to carry out the probe needed to clear away all the past wrong, and to form a new heart and a new spirit in his brothers. It was for God's sake and their sakes, not his own. He wanted the reality and the evidence of a divine work in their conscience and heart. This is why the cup went into Benjamin's sack.
A false charge is a hard way to reach a conscience. One writer weighs the motive and the method separately:
The trial was severe, yet love directed it in the fear of God. Even so, we may feel that the way he chose was in no way what the New Testament would suggest to the Christian… Joseph acted according to his measure, weakened no doubt by the Egyptian life around him. Scripture tells us the facts as they were, without approval or apology.
The charge is false, and that is what makes it work. The brothers could have defended themselves and taken offence. Instead the old sin surfaced:
They were innocent, indeed, about the cup. But this means nothing to their consciences… They had been called spies when they were true men. Now they were treated as common thieves, though they were honest men. They might have said this was too bad… But no — nothing of this — that was not the way of Joseph's brothers now. They had once hidden their guilt under the lie they sent to their father. Now they are willing to hide their innocence about the cup under the confession they make to Joseph.
The same writer weighs what this moment asks of them:
But this, simple as it seems, is the crisis… Will the sorrows of Benjamin move them, as the cries of Joseph once failed to do? Will the grief of the aged father at home plead with their heart, as once it did not? This place, this moment, was the field of Dothan again. They were returning, in spirit, to the place where all their offence was committed.
Joseph does not make himself known yet. He sends a steward with a charge instead. One writer sees a set order here:
However, before Joseph can be revealed to them they must be exposed before Joseph. To this end Joseph's cup is placed in Benjamin's sack. After they leave, Joseph's steward chases them and charges them with taking the cup. They protest their innocence.
Another writer carries the same order forward to Israel:
Notice only that here repentance is tied directly to the rejection of Joseph. This is brought home to the conscience of Joseph's brothers. So in the end it will be with Israel. It is not a matter of the law here — that comes after Sinai — but of the Messiah, whom Joseph pictures. Their consciences are fully convinced, and they go back over all the circumstances of his rejection. It is only gradually that Joseph reveals himself, and with many exercises of heart, which his dealings work in his brothers.
- Charge. Joseph's steward overtakes them just outside the city and accuses them of returning evil for good. The charge shocks them, and they protest that they would never do such a thing.
- Probe. The cup in Benjamin's sack was a deliberate test. It was meant to form a new heart and spirit in the brothers, for God's sake and theirs, not Joseph's.
- Honesty. Love directed the trial. Yet the method is not what the New Testament would suggest to a Christian. Scripture reports the facts without approval or apology.
- Memory. The false charge carries them back, in spirit, to the field of Dothan. Will Benjamin's sorrow move them where Joseph's cries did not?
- Revelation. Exposure comes before disclosure. The brothers must be exposed before Joseph reveals himself, and Israel will one day repent the same way over the Messiah it rejected.
Is not this [it] in which my lord drinks, and in which indeed he divines? Ye have done evil [in] what ye have done.
The steward says the missing cup is the one his master drinks from and uses to read hidden things. Yet Joseph had ordered that cup hidden in Benjamin's sack himself. So did Joseph practice divination, and what did he want from such a charge?
Joseph arranged the whole thing in advance. His aim was not punishment. He wanted a change of heart in men who had never faced what they had done.
Joseph's wisdom now shows itself in a way that leads his brothers to repentance without accusing them. He told his steward to fill their sacks with food and to put his own silver cup into the mouth of Benjamin's sack. The next morning they were on their way, no doubt glad that this time everything had gone so well.
One commentator doubts that Joseph used enchantments at all. He also rejects the idea that the cup was there to test the brothers' feelings.
In the first place, it would be hard to make me believe that Joseph used enchantments at all. That is the thought here in divining. I have very little doubt that Joseph was hiding his true self from them. He gave them the impression that he knew the magic arts of the Egyptians, and was simply an Egyptian lord. But I have no pronounced opinion on the subject. In the second place, the cup was not used to reach his brothers' affections. It was a means of reaching their consciences. The Lord will deal with the nation of Israel in this same way when He takes them up again. He will bring them to admit their guilt in rejecting Him.
Commentators differ here, and this one says plainly that he holds no settled opinion.
Under Joseph's questions the brothers stop hiding. Being fully known is what makes a person at home in the Lord's presence. The writer below quotes an older translation of verse 15, where the ESV reads "practice divination."
Under the searching questions of Joseph the whole truth is confessed. Joseph can say, "What deed is this that you have done?" "Do you not know that such a man as I can certainly make trial?" And this is ever the way grace takes. That is how the Lord dealt with a sinful woman "near the field that Jacob had given to his son Joseph." "Go, call your husband" was only another way of saying, "What deed is this that you have done?" He made Himself known to that guilty sinner as the One who can "certainly divine," for she said, "He told me all that I ever did." And no one can be happy and at home in the presence of the Lord of glory until they have learnt that the Lord knows the very worst thing about them — and yet loves them.
One writer grants that the method belonged to Joseph's setting and his limits. It is not a standard for us to copy.
Severe as the trial was, love dictated it in the fear of God. Still, we may feel that the method he chose was in no way what the New Testament would suggest to a Christian. Joseph acted up to the measure he had, weakened no doubt by the Egyptian life around him. Scripture tells us the facts as they were, without approving them and without excusing them.
The purpose was not cruelty or revenge. The same writer weighs the cost against the outcome.
He did it for God's sake and for their sakes, and not for his own. He wanted a real work of God in their conscience and heart, and the evidence of it. This dictated the cup in Benjamin's sack. No doubt the shock of finding it there deeply troubled the brothers. But that is how it must be when sin of the deepest kind lay at the bottom of it all. The cup was only a means to make them feel that sin and judge it. After all, the pain of the means employed was very brief... and the same day followed with forgiveness and joy and tender love.
The charge sets in motion the very doom the brothers once handed to Joseph. Judah takes it on himself instead of escaping it.
They were horror-stricken when the search found the cup in Benjamin's sack. All turned back to Egypt, and now Judah, to save Benjamin, volunteers to be the slave in his place. He faces the very doom to which he had consigned Joseph. When they reached that point, relief came... He had dealt wisely with them.
- Planted — Joseph ordered the cup hidden, so the charge is a planned test, not a real theft.
- Disguise — The talk of divining fits Joseph's cover as an Egyptian lord. One commentator doubts he used enchantments at all.
- Conscience — Joseph aimed the cup at their conscience, not their feelings. It exposes the brothers before it comforts them.
- Known — The One who can divine already knows the worst about us. No one is at home in His presence until they learn that He knows it and still loves them.
- Relief — Judah offers to take the slavery he once handed to Joseph. That same day the pain gives way to forgiveness and love.
And he overtook them, and he spoke to them these words.
The brothers have left the city, relieved that the trip to Egypt has gone well. Then Joseph's steward overtakes them with a charge of theft — a charge Joseph knew was false.
The steward is only a messenger. Joseph told him whom to chase and what to say, and the charge he carries is one of ingratitude.
Their relief was short lived. Joseph had told his steward to overtake them and accuse them of paying back evil for good by stealing Joseph's silver cup. Of course such an accusation was a shock to the brothers. They protested that they would not think of such a thing. They had found money in their sacks and brought it back. Surely that proved they were not thieves.
Why would Joseph press a charge he knew was false? Nothing here is an accident. The cup in Benjamin's sack and the words on the road serve one purpose.
Joseph, as a picture of Christ, was here to carry out a necessary test. It was meant to clear away all the past wrong, and to form a new heart and a new spirit in his brothers. He did it for God's sake and for their sakes, not for his own, so that a divine work in their conscience and heart would be both real and clear. This dictated the cup in Benjamin's sack. No doubt the shock of finding it there deeply troubled the brothers. But it had to be so, since the deepest kind of sin lay under it all. This was only a way to make them feel that sin and judge it. After all, the pain of the method used was very brief — a few hours, compared with what Joseph drank so deeply for years — and that same day brought forgiveness, joy, and tender love.
A plain difficulty sits on the surface. The accusation was untrue, and the steward knew it was untrue when he spoke it.
Severe as the trial was, love dictated it in the fear of God. Still, we may feel that the method he chose was in no way what the New Testament would suggest to a Christian... Joseph acted according to the measure he had, weakened no doubt by the Egyptian life around him. Scripture tells us the facts as they were, without approving them and without excusing them... But the written word is always the truth about things, whatever that truth may be. God alone gives us this... And the steward knew well what his master intended.
Years before, in a field called Dothan, these same men ignored a brother's cries. The steward's pursuit puts them back in that place.
This, simple as it seems, is the crisis. Their own lips will now have to give the verdict. The question is about to be put to them: are they the men they once were, or has a heart of flesh been given to them? Will the sorrows of Benjamin move them, as the cries of Joseph once failed to do? Will the grief of the aged father at home plead with their heart, as once it did not? This place, this moment, was the field of Dothan again.
Joseph could have told them who he was at any point. He waits, and the delay is deliberate.
Before Joseph can reveal himself to them, they must first be exposed before him. That is why Joseph's cup is put in Benjamin's sack.
One writer reads the whole scene as a picture of Israel's own repentance, still to come.
Here the repentance is directly connected with the rejection of Joseph. This is brought home to the conscience of Joseph's brothers. So in the end will it be with Israel... Their consciences are fully convinced, and they go back over everything that happened when they rejected him. Joseph reveals himself only step by step, through the many exercises of heart that his dealings work in his brothers.
- Scripted. The steward invents nothing. He speaks the words Joseph gave him, and he knew well what his master intended.
- Probing. The false charge is a probe, aimed at forming a new heart and a new spirit — for God's sake and theirs, not Joseph's.
- Placed. The cup goes into Benjamin's sack, and the brothers stand in the field of Dothan again. Will Benjamin's sorrow move them this time?
- Exposed. Joseph waits to reveal himself until his brothers stand exposed before him.
- Slow. Joseph reveals himself step by step, and so it will be in the end with Israel.
And they said to him, Why does my lord speak such words as these? Far be it from thy servants to do such a thing!
Joseph's steward overtakes the brothers on the road and accuses them of stealing. They deny it at once, and they are telling the truth — so what is a false charge meant to uncover?
Their "Far be it from your servants" is more than a denial. They also offer evidence.
Of course such an accusation was a shock to the brothers. They protested that they would not think of such a thing. They had found money in their sacks and brought it back. That was surely proof that they were not thieves. They are so sure of this that they say the man found with the silver cup should die, and the rest would become Joseph's slaves.
They stake a man's life and their own freedom on it.
They were innocent, but the charge still did its work. It reached past the cup and found what they had buried.
Tell me, what wrong was there about the cup? None. But it served to rouse conscience. It brought up the twenty pieces of silver, and the wickedness of their past. The poet said it well: "Conscience makes cowards of us all." Their state was miserable as they say to Joseph, "let not your anger burn against your servant, for you are like Pharaoh himself" (Gen. 44:18). But the truth must come out. And it is a great thing when God reaches the conscience like this.
The silver cup in a sack brings back the silver they once took for a brother.
The cup did not reach Benjamin's sack by accident. One writer explains what Joseph was aiming at.
Joseph, as a picture of Christ, was here to carry out the probe needed to clear away all the past mischief, and to form a new heart and a new spirit in his brothers. He did it for God's sake and for theirs, not for his own, so that a work of God in their conscience and heart would be real and visible. This dictated the cup in Benjamin's sack. No doubt the shock of its discovery there acutely troubled the brothers. But it had to be so, since the deepest kind of sin lay under it all. This was only a way to make that sin properly felt and judged. After all, the pain of the means employed was very brief... and the same day followed with forgiveness and joy and tender love.
Within hours their tone changes. The men who called the charge unthinkable stop defending themselves.
They really were innocent about the cup. But that counts for nothing in their consciences, and nothing on Judah's lips. Conviction loses sight of everything but sin. Its offence is its object. The brothers might have spoken up for their innocence. They might have felt hurt at being misunderstood and falsely accused again and again. They had been called spies when they were true men. Now they were treated as common thieves, though they were honest. They might have said this was too bad... But no — nothing of that — these were not the same brothers of Joseph any more. They had once hidden their guilt under the lie they sent to their father. Now they are willing to hide their innocence about the cup under the confession they make to Joseph.
One writer sees the same order repeating in Israel's future.
Notice that here the repentance is directly connected with the rejection of Joseph. That is what presses on the conscience of Joseph's brothers. So in the end it will be with Israel. It is not a matter of the law here — that we shall have after Sinai — but of Joseph as a picture of the Messiah. Their consciences are fully convinced, and they go back over everything that happened when they rejected him. Joseph reveals himself only step by step, through the deep searching of heart that his dealings work in his brothers.
- Innocent — They had not taken the cup. Pointing to the money they brought back was a fair defence.
- Probed — There was no sin about the cup. The false charge reached the real one: the silver they once took for Joseph.
- Loved — Joseph put the cup there for their sake, to form a new heart in them. The pain lasted hours; forgiveness came the same day.
- Silenced — Conviction stopped them pleading a clean record. Once they hid guilt under a lie; now they hide innocence under confession.
- Restored — Israel will follow the same order. Conscience is reached over a rejected brother, then that brother reveals himself.
Behold, the money that we found in our sacks' mouths we have brought again to thee from the land of Canaan; and how should we steal out of thy lord's house silver or gold?
Joseph's steward has caught up with the brothers and accused them of stealing his master's silver cup. Their reply points to their own record — they had already carried back money found in their sacks — and it is a true defence that still collapses.
On their first trip the grain money had turned up in their sacks. They carried it back instead of keeping it.
Of course such an accusation was a shock to the brothers. They protested that they would not think of such a thing. They had found the money in their sacks and brought it back. That was surely proof that they were not thieves (vv. 7-8). They are so confident that they say this: if the silver cup is found with one of them, let him die, and the rest will be Joseph's slaves (v. 9).
They are so sure of themselves that they name the penalty for the guilty one.
They were telling the truth about the cup. But notice what they do not say when the steward finds it.
They really were innocent about the cup. But that counts for nothing in their consciences, and nothing on Judah's lips. Conviction loses sight of everything but sin. The offence is all it looks at… The brothers might have spoken up about their innocence, and been hurt that people misunderstood them and accused them falsely again and again. People had called them spies when they were true men, and now they were treated like common thieves, though they were honest men. They might have said this was too bad… But no — nothing of this. Once they had hidden their guilt under the lie they sent to their father. Now they are willing to hide their innocence about the cup under the confession they make to Joseph.
There was no theft at all. Yet the charge still did its work, and it reached back into their past.
Joseph says, "What deed is this that you have done?" and Judah says, "How can we clear ourselves?" Friend, are you anxious to clear yourself? Listen to me. Confess your sins… Tell me, what iniquity was there in relation to the cup? None; but it served to rouse conscience. It brought up the twenty pieces of silver, and the wickedness of their history in days gone by.
The cup they never stole brought back the twenty pieces of silver they could not forget.
Their answer to the steward has two parts, and both stand on their own record. That record holds more than money.
Before Joseph can reveal himself to them, they must first be exposed in front of him. So Joseph has his cup put in Benjamin's sack. The brothers set out, and Joseph's steward chases them and charges them with taking the cup. They protest their innocence… Then they profess their honesty. Is it likely that men who are so honest with money would be guilty of a petty theft? But remember: these are the men who once sold their brother into slavery for twenty miserable pieces of silver. Men who had done that were quite capable of stealing a silver cup, whatever they protested. So the charge is not so unreasonable, unless they have really repented of the past.
They had made the same claim before, and it contradicted itself.
They have protested that they are true men, and in the same breath they say, "one is no more," knowing full well that if Joseph is gone from their lives, their own wickedness is the reason. They stand in front of the very one they rejected, with hearts that never repented, and still claim to be honest men.
The man setting the test is the brother they sold. He was not doing it for himself.
He did this for God's sake and for their sakes, not for his own. He wanted a real work of God in their conscience and heart, with clear evidence of it. That is what put the cup in Benjamin's sack… But it had to be this way, because sin of the deepest kind lay at the bottom of everything. This was only a means to make that sin felt and judged as it deserved. After all, the pain of the method he used was very short… and the same day followed with forgiveness and joy and tender love.
- Honest. The returned money was real proof. The brothers were not thieves, and their protest was true as far as it went.
- Not enough. A clean record on the cup said nothing about the brother they sold, and conviction "loses sight of everything but sin."
- Roused. They had no guilt at all about the cup. Yet it "served to rouse conscience" and brought back the twenty pieces of silver.
- Exposed. Joseph could not reveal himself until they were exposed. Their protest of innocence and their claim of honesty had to fall first.
- Loved. The one who set the test was the brother they wronged. The pain was brief, and forgiveness, joy and tender love came the same day.
With whomsoever of thy servants it is found, let him die; and we also will be my lord's bondmen.
Accused of stealing Joseph's silver cup, the brothers answer with a sweeping offer: let the thief die, and make slaves of the rest of us. They are telling the truth about the cup. Their real guilt lies somewhere else.
Their confidence rests on their own recent conduct, and they stake their lives on it.
Of course such an accusation was a shock to the brothers. They protested that they would not think of such a thing. They had found the money in their sacks and brought it back. Surely that was proof they were not thieves. They are so confident of this that they say: if the silver cup is found with one of them, he should die, and the rest would be slaves to Joseph.
The terms they propose are heavier than the terms they receive. The steward, acting on instructions, narrows the penalty and lets the others walk free.
The steward approved of their words, but his own answer was far milder. Of course Joseph had instructed him. He tells them that the guilty one would be kept as a slave to Joseph and the rest could go free. The search began at the eldest, finishing with the youngest, in whose sack the silver cup was found. What a shock to them all! What a traumatic experience for Benjamin who knew himself innocent!
The cup did not reach Benjamin's sack by accident. Joseph aimed it at something older and deeper than a theft.
Joseph was here to carry out the test needed to clear up all the past mischief, and to form a new heart and a new spirit in his brothers. He did it for God's sake and for their sakes, not for his own, so that a work of God in their conscience and heart would be real and evident. This dictated the cup in Benjamin's sack. No doubt the shock of finding it there deeply troubled the brothers. But it had to be that way, because the deepest kind of sin lay under it all. This was only a means to make them feel it and judge it as they should.
Kelly defends the motive, but not the method:
Severe as the trial was, love dictated it in the fear of God, though we may feel that the mode adopted was in no way what the New Testament would suggest to the Christian… Scripture tells us the facts as they were, without sanction or apology.
The rash sentence in this verse sets up a scene the brothers have lived through before: one favoured son of Rachel condemned, and the rest free to go home.
Will the sorrows of Benjamin move them, as the cries of Joseph once failed to do? Will the grief of the aged father at home plead with their heart, as once it did not? This place, this moment, was the field of Dothan again. They were going back, in spirit, to the place where they had done all their wrong. In the field of Dothan, in Genesis 37, they had to answer one question: would they sacrifice their innocent brother Joseph to their lusts, their envy, and their malice? Here Benjamin is claimed as a captive, because the cup was found in his sack. He is claimed as a man who has forfeited life and liberty to the lord of Egypt. In the same way, they must now say whether they would sacrifice him, and go on their way home, easy and careless and satisfied.
They could have argued their case. Instead they drop the defence entirely.
They were innocent, indeed, as to the cup. But this is nothing to their consciences, and nothing on Judah's lips. Conviction loses sight of everything but sin. The offence is all it looks at. "For I know my transgressions, and my sin is ever before me." … They had once hidden their guilt under the lie they sent to their father. Now they are willing to hide their innocence about the cup under the confession they make to Joseph.
The slavery they offer so freely here becomes real. It falls on the man who once sold a brother into it.
They were accused of stealing the cup, though they were guiltless of it. They declare that they are willing for the offender to die, and for the rest to be slaves in Egypt. … Now Judah, to save Benjamin, volunteers to be the slave in his place. He faces the very doom to which he had consigned Joseph. When this was reached, relief came.
- Boast — Sure of their clean record on the cup, they name their own penalty: death for the thief, slavery for the rest.
- Mercy — The steward at once softens their terms, keeping only the guilty one and freeing the others.
- Probe — The planted cup was a test by design. It aimed at an older, deeper sin, not at a theft.
- Exposure — Back in spirit at the field of Dothan, they drop a defence they could have won. Conviction stops arguing about the cup and confesses.
- Substitution — Judah takes in earnest the slavery they had offered so easily, and only then does relief come.
And he said, Now also [let] it [be] according to your words let him with whom it is found be my bondman, but ye shall be blameless.
Joseph's steward has just accused the brothers of theft, and they swore a rash oath: let the guilty man die, and the rest of us be slaves. His reply cuts that down to one man and one penalty, and so sets up the test of what these ten men have become.
The brothers had offered far more than the steward asked. Acting on Joseph's orders, he scales their oath back to one guilty man and one penalty.
The steward approved of their words, but his answer was far more lenient. Of course Joseph had instructed him. He tells them that Joseph would keep the guilty one as a slave, and the rest could go free.
The hidden cup, the chase and the terms were not revenge. Commentators see a test designed for the brothers' good.
God's moral government required that the brothers be searched even more thoroughly. Joseph is His instrument, and he thinks up a still harder test. It was meant to carry their self-judgment all the way through. It was also meant to prove that their love for their father and their brother was now real and warm — after they had been so deeply guilty toward both long ago. Love joined righteousness in working this way for their highest good.
The steward's words hand the other ten an exit. That exit is the test. Years earlier these men had left one brother behind and gone home untroubled.
Will Benjamin's sorrows move them, when Joseph's cries once failed to? Will their old father's grief at home plead with their heart, as it once did not? This place, this moment, was the field of Dothan again. In spirit they were going back to the place where they had committed the whole offence.
Dothan is the field where they first handed Joseph over to slavery. Everything repeats: the youngest and best-loved son is lost, the road home is open, and no one is left to accuse them.
The charge itself was false. That is why it worked. A false charge reached a real guilt from years before.
Tell me, what wrong had they done about the cup? None. But it served to wake their conscience. It brought up the twenty pieces of silver, and the wickedness of their history in earlier days.
They could have insisted on the innocence the steward had just granted them. They do not.
Once they hid their guilt under the lie they sent to their father. Now they are willing to hide their innocence about the cup under the confession they make to Joseph.
The steward found the cup where Joseph had put it. The other ten were free to go. They went back instead.
Will they abandon their brother to slavery, knowing he is innocent? They did this with Joseph; will they do it with Benjamin? Will they go back to Jacob and face his grief with some false story to explain why Benjamin is missing, as they once explained Joseph's loss? Ah, no! Grace has worked in these men; repentance has done its work.
- Sentence — They swore death for the thief and slavery for the rest. On Joseph's instruction, the steward cut it down to one man and one penalty. Mercy was already at work inside the accusation.
- Loophole — "The rest of you shall be innocent" was a door left open on purpose. Love and righteousness designed the test together, and only a changed heart would refuse the way out.
- Dothan — The scene rebuilds their old crime: the best-loved son lost, the road home clear, the father waiting. They face the same question a second time.
- Conscience — There was no real guilt about the cup at all. The false charge reached a true sin buried years back. They stopped trying to clear themselves.
- Proof — The steward offered them their innocence. They refused it and came back with Benjamin. Repentance showed itself not in what they said, but in the freedom they would not use.
And they hasted and laid down every man his sack on the ground, and opened every man his sack.
Ten men stand on the road out of Egypt. They are accused of stealing the silver cup of the man who had just fed them, and they are so sure of themselves that they stake a life and their freedom on the outcome. Verse 11 is the moment the sacks come down in the dust and every mouth is untied. It is the last moment before everything they thought about themselves collapses.
Nobody forces this search on them. They answer the steward's charge with their own record in money matters, and then they set the penalty themselves.
They protested that they would never think of such a thing. They had found the money in their sacks and brought it back. That was surely proof that they were not thieves. They are so sure of this that they say that if the silver cup is found with one of them, he should die and the rest would be slaves to Joseph.
Their defence has a hole in it:
Remember, these are the men who once sold their brother into slavery for twenty small pieces of silver. Men who had acted like that would be quite capable of stealing a silver cup, whatever they protested.
The speed of verse 11 is the speed of a clear conscience. Men with something to hide do not unload in a hurry.
Their relief lasted only as long as the search did.
They quickly took the sacks down. So the man hunted for the cup. He began at the oldest, right to the last — Benjamin's. While he hunted and could not find the cup, they were happy. Then they saw him find the silver cup in Benjamin's sack. How did they feel? They tore their clothes, they were so sad! Twenty years before, they had sold their little brother as a slave. What now?
The cup did not walk into Benjamin's sack. Someone put it there, and he had a purpose far beyond the cup.
Joseph, a picture of Christ, was here to make the search that was needed. It had to clear up all the past wrong and form a new heart and a new spirit in his brothers. He did it for God's sake and for their sakes, not for his own, so that God's work in their conscience and heart might be real and might be seen. That is what put the cup in Benjamin's sack. No doubt the shock of finding it there troubled the brothers deeply. But it had to be that way, because sin of the deepest kind lay at the bottom of it all. This was simply the means to make them feel that sin and judge it.
The same writer does not hold Joseph's method up as a model:
The test was severe, but love chose it in the fear of God. Still, we may feel that the way Joseph went about it was nothing like what the New Testament would suggest to a Christian… Scripture tells us the facts as they were, without approving them and without excusing them.
They really were innocent of taking the cup. But being innocent of the charge is not the same as being clear before God. When they come back to Joseph, not one of them says a word in his own defence.
They really were innocent about the cup. But that counts for nothing with their consciences… Conviction loses sight of everything but sin. The wrong it has done is all it looks at… The brothers could have spoken of their innocence. They could have felt hurt at being misunderstood and falsely accused like this, again and again… Once they hid their guilt under the lie they sent to their father. Now they are willing to hide their innocence about the cup under the confession they make to Joseph.
Joseph could have named himself at the dinner table. He waits, and the order matters.
Joseph speaks kindly to them. He longs in love over his younger brother. He weeps in love in secret, but he holds himself back in love, because love's time to show itself has not yet come… They are rejoicing in his gifts, but they have yet to rejoice in him. Yet before Joseph can show them who he is, they must stand exposed in front of him. That is why his cup goes into Benjamin's sack.
Commentators read the whole sequence as a picture of a later reconciliation.
Joseph's brothers, in Genesis 42 to 44, are a picture of the twelve tribes of Israel (including Judah) in their future restoration, when they will be led to accept the rejected but true Joseph. Their story also shows us how restoration works and what true repentance is.
- Opened. They lower every sack fast, sure the search will clear them. They have answered the wrong charge.
- Searched. The search runs from eldest to youngest. Their relief lasts right up to the last sack, where it ends.
- Exposed. Nobody stole the cup. Love planted it, so they would feel the sin at the bottom of everything and judge it.
- Convicted. They never plead their innocence about the cup. Conviction sees nothing but sin, so they hide that innocence under a confession.
- Revealed. Joseph waits until they stand exposed, then says who he is. Commentators see here a picture of a reconciliation still ahead.
And he searched carefully he began at the eldest, and ended at the youngest; and the cup was found in Benjamin's sack.
The steward searches the sacks one by one, oldest to youngest, and every brother watches. Why would the ruler of Egypt hide his own cup in the sack of the one brother who never wronged him?
One writer points to the innocent man at the end of the line:
The search began at the eldest, finishing with the youngest, in whose sack the silver cup was found (v. 12). What a shock to them all! What a traumatic experience for Benjamin who knew himself innocent!
The brothers had not touched the cup. One writer asks what their real guilt was:
Tell me, what wrong had they done about the cup? None. But it served to wake up conscience. It brought back the twenty pieces of silver, and the wickedness of their past. Well said the poet, "Conscience makes cowards of us all."
Another writer marks what the cup was for:
It was not used to get at the affections of his brothers. It was a means of getting at their consciences.
The cup in Benjamin's sack cost the youngest brother his freedom. The other ten could walk away unharmed. One writer sees the old crime set up a second time. Dothan was the field where they had turned on Joseph years before:
This place, this moment, was the field of Dothan again. They were returning, in spirit, to the place where all their offence was committed. In the field of Dothan, in Genesis 37, they had to answer one question. Would they sacrifice their innocent brother Joseph to their lusts, their envy, and their malice? Now Benjamin is claimed as a captive because of the cup found in his sack. He is claimed as one who has forfeited life and liberty to the lord of Egypt. The same question is put to them again. Will they sacrifice him, and go on their way home, easy and careless and satisfied?
Another writer sets out the choice the ten men now faced:
Benjamin stands in the place that once had been Joseph's — the youngest and best-loved son of his father. Benjamin will go into slavery, as Joseph once filled the place of a slave. The ten brothers are completely free, as they were before, to return to their father in peace. What will they do in these circumstances?
One writer explains why Joseph chose such a painful method:
He did it for God's sake and for their sakes, not for his own. He wanted a real and visible work of God in their conscience and heart. That is what put the cup in Benjamin's sack. No doubt the shock of finding it there deeply troubled the brothers. But it must be so where sin of the deepest kind lies at the bottom of everything. This was only a means to make them feel it and judge it. After all, the pain of the means he used was very brief... and the same day ended with forgiveness and joy and tender love.
The same writer adds a caution: "Love dictated it in the fear of God. Yet we may feel that the way he took was in no way what the New Testament would suggest to the Christian."
Once the cup came out of the sack, they stopped defending themselves. One writer weighs that change, and adds a warning:
The memory of their sin now overwhelms them. They give up all attempts to clear themselves, and hand themselves over as guilty... A person may feel any amount of anguish, sorrow and remorse, as Judas Iscariot did, and still have no true conversion and no true change of mind.
One writer sees here a pattern of how God will deal "with the nation of Israel when He takes them up again, and brings them to acknowledge their guilt in rejecting Him" — James Boyd
- Searched. The steward went from eldest to youngest. The cup came out last, in the sack of the one brother who had never wronged Joseph.
- Accused. There was no theft. The false charge existed to reopen a true one — the twenty pieces of silver and the brother they sold.
- Tested. Benjamin now stood where Joseph once stood, and the ten were free to walk home. They faced Dothan a second time.
- Loved. The severity came from love and lasted hours, not years, and the same day ended in forgiveness.
- Broken. They stopped clearing themselves and owned their guilt. That was what Joseph had been working toward.
Then they rent their clothes, and loaded every man his ass, and they returned to the city.
They tore their clothes because the silver cup had turned up in Benjamin's sack. The ten men were free to ride home. Instead they reloaded every donkey and went back to the man who could enslave them. That choice is the hinge of the whole story.
The steward searched the sacks one by one. Each empty sack lifted the brothers' hopes — until he reached Benjamin's.
While he hunted and could not find the cup they were happy, but when they saw him find the silver cup in Benjamin's sack, how did they feel? They tore their clothes, they were so sad! Twenty years before they had sold their little brother for a slave, but now what? Will they turn away and leave Benjamin to be a slave, and go home again? We see how wise and kind Joseph was; he used the same thing to make them remember... God had worked in the hearts of these ten men, so now they would not let their brother be a slave.
Benjamin now stood where Joseph once stood. He was the favourite young son heading for slavery, and his ten older brothers had a clear road home.
Benjamin stands in the place that once had been Joseph's — the youngest and best-loved son of his father. Benjamin will go into slavery, as Joseph once filled the place of a slave. The ten brothers are completely free, as they were before, to return to their father in peace. What will they do in these circumstances? Will they act again as they did long ago in the fields of Dothan? Will they abandon their brother to slavery knowing him to be innocent?
Their loaded donkeys answered the question. Dothan was the field where they had seized Joseph and sold him; this moment brought them back to it in spirit.
This place, this moment, was the field of Dothan again. They were returning, in spirit, to the place where all their offence was committed... Here Benjamin is claimed as a captive, because the cup was found in his sack. He is claimed as one who has forfeited his life and his freedom to the ruler of Egypt. In the same way the question is put to them: will they sacrifice him, and go on their way home, at ease, unconcerned and satisfied?
The direction of their travel says more than their grief does. They turned around, and walked straight into the dreams they had once hated Joseph for.
To repay the governor's kindness with such an evil as stealing his cup filled the brothers with anguish — all the more because the cup was found with Benjamin. No wonder they tore their clothes, and every man loaded his donkey, and they returned to the city heartbroken. And now more than ever they paid Joseph the fullest homage fulfilling his dreams without knowing it, as they fell before him on the ground.
Not one of them had touched the cup. Yet they make no protest about the charge. They confess something else instead.
They were innocent, indeed, when it came to the cup. But this is nothing to their consciences, and nothing on Judah's lips. Conviction loses sight of everything but sin. Its own offence is all it looks at... They had once hidden their guilt under the lie they sent to their father. Now they are willing to hide their innocence about the cup under the confession they make to Joseph.
But torn clothes on their own prove nothing. Grief over being caught is not the same as a changed mind.
There was, no doubt, a great change in them from that day when Joseph was cast into the pit. A person may feel any amount of anguish, sorrow and remorse, as Judas Iscariot did. There may still be no true conversion and no true change of mind.
The pressure had a purpose. It ended at the point where Judah offered himself in Benjamin's place.
They are accused of stealing the cup, though they are not guilty of it. They declare that they are willing for the guilty one to die... They are horror-stricken when the search finds the cup in Benjamin's sack. All turned back to Egypt, and now Judah, to save Benjamin, volunteers to be the slave in his place. He faces the very doom he had forced on Joseph. Once he reached that point, relief came.
- Planted. Joseph had the cup hidden in Benjamin's sack. It was a test to make his brothers remember, not a trap to destroy them.
- Repeated. Benjamin now fills Joseph's old place. He is the loved youngest son bound for slavery, and the other ten are free to walk away.
- Reversed. Torn clothes could be mere remorse. The reloaded donkeys and the road back to the city mark the real change of heart.
- Redirected. Under conviction they never argue about the cup. Sin blots out everything else, and they confess old guilt instead of present innocence.
- Released. Judah offers to take the slave's place, and relief comes at once. The test ends the moment repentance is real.
And Judah and his brethren came to Joseph's house; and he was still there; and they fell down before him to the ground.
Joseph had let the brothers go home to Canaan, but verse 14 finds them back in the city, face down in his house, before a ruler they still do not recognise. Why did ten free men turn around, and what did God do in them on the way?
The cup in Benjamin's sack was more than a trick. It put the brothers back in the test they had faced years before in the fields of Dothan.
They are getting ready to go back to Canaan a second time with food for themselves and their households. Joseph's cup goes into Benjamin's sack, and they set out on their journey. But this, simple as it seems, is the crisis. Their own lips will now have to give the verdict. The question is about to be put to them: are they the men they once were, or have they been given a heart of flesh? Will the sorrows of Benjamin move them, as the cries of Joseph once failed to do? Will their old father's grief at home move their heart, as it once did not? This place, this moment, was the field of Dothan again.
Everything about the arrangement invited them to walk away. Benjamin alone would stay behind; the other ten could go home to their father in peace.
Benjamin stands in the place that once had been Joseph's — the youngest and best-loved son of his father. Benjamin shall pass into bondage, as once Joseph had filled the place of a slave. The ten brothers are perfectly free, as once before, to return to their father in peace. What will they do now? Will they abandon their brother to slavery, knowing he is innocent? They did this to Joseph; will they do it to Benjamin? Will they go back to Jacob and face his grief with some false story about why Benjamin is missing, as they once explained away the loss of Joseph? Ah, no! Grace has been at work in these men, and repentance has done its work.
Kelly sees in their grief and their bowing a picture of a later day.
No wonder that they tore their clothes, and each man loaded his donkey, and returned to the city heartbroken. And now more than ever they paid Joseph the fullest homage as they fell before him on the ground, fulfilling his dreams without knowing it… And what will it be when the picture comes true, and the Lord Himself appears to the Judah of a future day? They will look on Him whom they pierced, and mourn as for an only son, each family on its own, and the wives on their own (Zech. 12).
Their bowing answered one of Joseph's two dreams. The other is still waiting.
There was a fulfilment in picture form when his brothers bowed low to him in Egypt. Their sheaves bowed to his. And they did not fail to honour him after they knew who he was. But this did not meet the full meaning of Joseph's prophetic dreams. The sheaves of Israel are to bow to Messiah. But the second dream shows more: the sun, the moon and the eleven stars — every ruling power in the world, Gentile or Jewish — bowing to Christ in the person of His representative.
The verse names Judah first, ahead of his brothers. He was not the eldest.
It is not Reuben, the eldest, who speaks to Joseph, but Judah, the one who had been leader in selling Joseph as a slave. He does not plead any defense whatever. He himself was not guilty of stealing the cup. Even so, he realizes that God was using this to remind him of their earlier guilt in selling Joseph.
They were innocent of taking the cup, and they had every reason to say so. They did not.
They really were innocent about the cup. But this is nothing to their consciences, and nothing on Judah's lips. Conviction loses sight of everything except sin. Its own offence is all it sees… Once they hid their guilt under the lie they sent to their father. Now they are willing to hide their innocence about the cup under the confession they make to Joseph… Confession, and not self-defence, is their language.
- Repeated — The cup in Benjamin's sack put the brothers back in the field of Dothan. The same choice faced them: give up the youngest son, or not.
- Refused — They were free to go home without Benjamin. Turning back instead proved that grace had done its work in them.
- Represented — Judah once led the selling of Joseph. Now he walks in front and offers no defence, because conviction has room for nothing but its own offence.
- Reversed — Face down before a brother they do not recognise, they fulfil his dreams without knowing it.
- Reaching further — This answers only the first of Joseph's dreams. The fuller scene is still ahead: Israel looking on the One they pierced, and every ruling power bowing to Christ.
And Joseph said to them, What deed is this which ye have done? Did ye not know that such a man as I can certainly divine?
Joseph's brothers stand before the Egyptian ruler they do not recognise, caught with his silver cup in Benjamin's sack. His second question raises two puzzles: what knowledge is he claiming, and why is a man who fears God staging a false theft?
The planted cup is not a random trap. It puts the brothers back into the exact situation of the day they sold Joseph, with Benjamin now in his place.
While they are preparing to return to Canaan a second time with food, Joseph's cup is put in Benjamin's sack. Then they set out. But this, simple as it seems, is the crisis. Their own lips will now have to give the verdict. The question is about to be put: are they as they once were, or has a heart of flesh been given to them? Will the sorrows of Benjamin move them, as the cries of Joseph once failed to do?... This place, this moment, was the field of Dothan again.
They have done nothing wrong with the cup, and Joseph knows it. The accusation works on something older than the theft it names.
Tell me, what wrong was there about the cup? None; but it served to rouse conscience. It brought up the twenty pieces of silver, and the wickedness of their history in days gone by. Well said the poet, "Conscience makes cowards of us all"... But the truth must come out. And it is a great thing when God reaches the conscience like this.
The claim Joseph makes would sound ordinary in an Egyptian court. Cups served as tools for fortune-telling.
Among the means of divination named is "divining by the cup," Genesis 44:5, 15. The Egyptians and Persians practised it. It is described like this: they threw small pieces of metal and stones, marked with signs, into the cup, and gathered answers from the marks as they fell. Sometimes they filled the cup with water, and as the sun fell on the water, they saw or imagined images on its surface.
Commentators differ over the word itself. Some take it as the Egyptian practice his position implied. Others follow the margin, which reads that such a man can "certainly make trial" — that is, test and search out.
Read that second way, the question is not about magic. It claims a knowledge that leaves nothing hidden. One writer sees the same searching in how Jesus spoke to a woman whose past He named.
Under the searching questions of Joseph they confess the whole truth. Joseph can say, "What deed is this that you have done?" "Do you not know that such a man as I can certainly make trial?" And this is always the way grace takes. So the Lord dealt with a sinful woman "near the field that Jacob gave to his son Joseph." "Go, call your husband" was only another way of saying, "What deed is this that you have done?" And how truly He made Himself known to that guilty sinner as the One who can "certainly divine," for she said, "He told me all that I ever did." And none can be happy and at home in the presence of the Lord of glory until they have learnt that the Lord knows the very worst thing about them, and yet loves them.
Why cause the pain at all? Because a real work in them mattered more to Joseph than his own relief.
It was for God's sake and their sakes, rather than his own, that there might be the reality and the evidence of a divine work in their conscience and heart. This dictated the cup in Benjamin's sack. No doubt the shock of its discovery there deeply troubled the brothers. But so it must be where sin of the deepest kind lay at the bottom of all... After all, the pain of the means he used was very brief, and the same day brought forgiveness and joy and tender love.
The same writer refuses to turn Joseph's method into a model, and that honesty is part of how Scripture works.
Severe as the trial was, love dictated it in the fear of God. Yet we may feel that the way he chose was in no way what the New Testament would suggest to a Christian... Joseph acted according to his measure, weakened no doubt by the Egyptian life around him. Scripture tells us the facts as they were, without approval or excuse.
- Crisis. The planted cup rebuilds the day at Dothan. The brothers must choose again: save themselves, or stand by their brother.
- Conscience. The charge is false, and that is the point. A harmless matter drags a twenty-year-old guilt into the open.
- Cup. Divining by cup was a known Egyptian and Persian practice; the margin also allows the sense that such a man can "certainly make trial."
- Knowledge. Grace searches before it comforts. No one is at ease before the Lord until they know He sees the worst in them and loves them still.
- Love. The pain was short and deliberate. It aimed at a real work in their hearts, and the same day ended in forgiveness.
And Judah said, What shall we say to my lord? what shall we speak, and how justify ourselves? God has found out the iniquity of thy servants; behold, we are my lord's bondmen, both we, and he in whose hand the cup has been found.
The cup turns up in Benjamin's sack, and Judah offers no defence. He confesses a guilt that has nothing to do with the cup — so why does a man stop clearing himself when he is innocent of the theft?
The brothers had stolen nothing. Yet the charge reached back to something far older:
Joseph says, "What deed is this that you have done?" and Judah says, "How can we clear ourselves?" Friend, are you anxious to clear yourself? Listen to me. Confess your sins. That is the necessity... Tell me, what iniquity was there in relation to the cup? None; but it served to rouse conscience. It brought up the twenty pieces of silver, and the wickedness of their history in days gone by.
Their innocence about the cup was real, but they said nothing in their own favour:
Conviction loses sight of everything but sin. Its own offence is all it looks at... Once they hid their guilt under the lie they sent to their father. Now they are willing to hide their innocence about the cup under the confession they make to Joseph.
Judah does not say the governor found them out. He names God. No human pressure produces that kind of admission:
None can teach like God. He alone can produce in the conscience the true sense of sin, and bring the soul down into the very depths of its own condition in His presence. This is all His own work. People run on in their course of guilt, taking notice of nothing, until the arrow of the Almighty pierces their conscience. Then they are brought into deep searching of heart and intense exercise of soul. Only the rich resources of redeeming love can give them relief.
Three questions come before the confession: what to say, what to speak, how to clear themselves. Judah drops all three in the same breath:
They no longer try to justify themselves about the present, and they do not try to clear themselves about the past. They are convicted sinners "found out" by God; and they entirely submit to Joseph, "we are my lord's servants," they say.
Seeing your state is one thing. Saying it out loud is another:
This is the point God would bring us to. Not only conscience making us see our state, but also the owning of that state. "I acknowledged my sin to you, and I did not cover my iniquity; I said, 'I will confess my transgressions to the LORD,' and you forgave the iniquity of my sin." So said David in Psalm 32, and so must every soul that really turns to God.
Reuben was the eldest, but Judah answers. Of the brothers, he is the last one you would expect to stand beside a younger son under accusation:
It is not Reuben, the eldest, who speaks to Joseph, but Judah, the one who had been leader in selling Joseph as a slave. He does not plead any defence whatever. He had not been guilty of stealing the cup. Even so, he realises that God was using this to remind him of their earlier guilt in selling Joseph... He does not condemn Benjamin and justify himself. Instead he takes his place with Benjamin and his brothers, willing to accept the place of slaves to Joseph.
Once, their father's grief counted for nothing to Judah. Now it is the thing he cannot bear:
Instead of hardness, great tenderness of feeling, particularly for his old father, Jacob. Then it did not matter how Jacob would feel; now it mattered everything to him. Here we see repentance at work — the kind no one ever regrets.
Deep feeling is not proof of a changed heart. One writer gives a warning:
There may be any amount of anguish, sorrow, and remorse, as it was with Judas Iscariot, and still no true conversion, and no true change of mind.
Some writers see here a picture of Israel's future meeting with Christ:
He is unknown to them, yet He is seeking them. He will make them see their Benjamin as Ben-oni, the son of sorrow — and that as the fruit of their own sin. Benjamin is taken from them: they have lost their part in Messiah, because they rejected Him. Everything deep in Judah's heart is stirred. Then, in his agony for Benjamin, Joseph reveals himself and overwhelms him.
- Found out. The cup was never the real charge. It reached back to a twenty-year-old sin no one had confessed.
- God teaches. Judah names God as the one who uncovered them. Real conviction of sin is His own work, not the pressure of circumstances.
- Clearing stops. Three questions collapse into one confession. They stop defending the present and stop excusing the past.
- Judah changes. The man who led the sale of Joseph will not save himself at a younger brother's expense. Repentance shows in what he is willing to lose.
- Test it. Remorse can run deep and still not be conversion. Real repentance owns the guilt and submits.
And he said, Far be it from me to do so! The man in whose hand the cup has been found, he shall be my bondman; but as for you, go up in peace to your father.
Joseph's silver cup has turned up in Benjamin's sack, and ten frightened men stand again before the brother they once sold. His sentence sounds generous — one man held, the rest sent home in peace — but it is the sharpest test of all.
Joseph plays the part of a ruler with no personal stake in the case. His sentence is really a piece of wisdom aimed at the heart.
Joseph for a moment pretends that all this is nothing to him. This may be their business, if they like, but Benjamin was his. Benjamin is the guilty one, as far as the great man in Egypt is concerned. He must remain, and the rest may take themselves home as fast as they please. What could exceed this? Did Solomon's wisdom in settling the case between the two women exceed it? He sat in the place of judgment and found out the heart of a mother. Does not Joseph here, in the same wisdom from God, find out the heart of his brothers? The heart is indeed laid open.
Their freedom to leave is the point. Joseph has rebuilt the old situation piece by piece, and the same choice is theirs again.
Benjamin stands in the place that once was Joseph's — the youngest and best-loved son of his father. Benjamin shall pass into bondage, as once Joseph filled the place of a slave. The ten brothers are perfectly free, as once before, to return to their father in peace. What will they do in these circumstances? Will they again act as in the days of old in the fields of Dothan? Will they abandon their brother to slavery knowing him to be innocent?
Dothan was the field where the brothers sold Joseph into slavery. Commentators see this moment as that same scene rebuilt, with the verdict now in the brothers' own hands.
This place, this moment, was the field of Dothan again. They were returning, in spirit, to the place where they committed their whole offence. In the field of Dothan, in Genesis 37, they had to answer one question. Would they sacrifice their innocent brother Joseph to their lusts, their envy, and their malice? Here the lord of Egypt claims Benjamin as a captive because of the cup found in his sack. He claims him as one who has forfeited life and liberty. In the same way the question comes to them: would they sacrifice him, and go on home, easy and careless and satisfied?
Nothing here is payback. God's own government stands behind the pressure Joseph applies.
The moral government of God required a still deeper searching of the brothers. Joseph is His instrument, and he devises a still more trying test. It was meant to carry self-judgment to the uttermost, and also to prove that their love for their father and their brother was now sound and strong — after their deep guilt toward both long before. Love joined righteousness in working for their best good.
The same writer does not hold Joseph up as a model of method. The motive was right; Scripture records the means without approval.
Severe as the trial was, love dictated it in the fear of God. Yet we may feel that the way he went about it was in no way what the New Testament would suggest to the Christian… Joseph acted according to his measure, weakened no doubt by the Egyptian life that surrounded him. Scripture tells us the facts as they were, without approval or apology.
The ten do not take the road home. Judah asks for the slave's place Joseph has just given Benjamin.
The last words of Judah to Joseph are refreshing in the way they reach the root of the whole matter. He asks Joseph to let him take the place of Benjamin as a slave, and to let Benjamin return to his father (v. 33). What a contrast to the way Judah had before treated his younger brother Joseph! This was the end Joseph had been seeking. He wanted to see in Judah a genuine repentance, one willing to suffer as he had made his brother suffer.
Some writers see more here than family history. They read the whole sequence as a picture of Israel's restoration.
In Genesis 42 to 44, Joseph's brothers foreshadow the twelve tribes of Israel, Judah included. They picture Israel's future restoration, when they will be led to accept the rejected but true Joseph. Their story also brings to light certain principles about the work of restoration and about true repentance.
- Narrowed — Joseph pins the whole case on one man. The other ten are free to go, with nothing to answer for.
- Released — the freedom to go home in peace is not mercy but the test; it recreates the choice they made at Dothan.
- Refused — they will not take the road home without their brother. The old hardness is gone.
- Loved — the harshness aimed at their good: to prove their love for father and brother real. Commentators note that his method is not a model to copy.
- Reversed — Judah asks for the slave's place he once forced on Joseph, and that is what Joseph was after all along.