Genesis 40:1–23

Genesis 40:1 · Darby

And it came to pass after these things, [that] the cup-bearer of the king of Egypt and the baker offended their lord the king of Egypt.

Two of Pharaoh's officers fall out of favour with him. They land in the very prison that holds Joseph. The verse says nothing about their crime, and nothing about God. Yet everything that follows for Joseph turns on this moment.

The unnamed offence

Scripture leaves the crime blank. One writer suggests why Pharaoh would suspect these two men in particular, then counts the moves God was making:

Both the chief butler and the chief baker of Pharaoh had offended their lord. Nothing is stated about the nature of their offence. But Pharaoh was of a foreign race, and so likely to fear that someone would try to poison him. It is not surprising that the two men in charge of his drink and his food had both fallen under suspicion. While the matter awaited a decision, they stayed in the same prison as Joseph, and were put in his charge. The first link in the chain of events God ordered was that Joseph should be put in the place where the king's prisoners were held. The second was that in due time these two men should be placed there too.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A hand no one could see

Nothing here looks like God at work. Yet God is steering the whole episode:

The hand of God was in all this, however little it looked like it. In the king's prison house were two servants of Pharaoh, his chief baker and chief butler.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

That hidden work went further than Joseph's release. It never included clearing his name:

In this account of the imprisonment of Joseph and the butler and the baker, God was at work in grace behind the scenes. He worked both to bring Joseph out of prison and to lift him up in a way that would normally have been unthinkable for a Hebrew... Nothing was said about the reason he had been put in prison. As far as the record goes, he was never cleared of the charge falsely brought against him. He evidently left this in the hand of God, who knows how to guard His servant's reputation.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The prisoner put in charge of prisoners

Joseph answers each drop in status the same way. He serves wherever he lands.

Joseph had served as a slave in Potiphar's house. Now he served as a criminal in the tower-house, falsely accused of what was true of his accuser. But his faith stayed simple, peaceful and bright. We notice its effect on those who had no faith themselves, yet valued faithfulness highly. The captain put Joseph in charge of the king's officers. In his master's house before, and now in the governor's state prison, he became the responsible man: whatever needed doing there, he did it. The Lord was with him in each place of trial; and whatever he did, the Lord made it prosper.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two men, two outcomes

The two men arrive together and are jailed together. One writer sees here a picture of what happens where Christ comes among people:

Here were two men in the same place of confinement. Both stood condemned, and so far as we know both were equally guilty — or innocent. They looked exactly alike in every outward way. Christ (Joseph) comes among them and pronounces one saved and the other lost.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer compares the two officers with the men executed beside Jesus. The difference is not the suffering but the guilt:

And we see two others suffering with him — Pharaoh's two officers, his chief butler and his chief baker. But they do not suffer as Joseph does. He suffered though he was innocent. They were most likely receiving the due reward of their deeds, like the two thieves crucified with Christ. Joseph was ruler in the dungeon, and the verdict of his fellow prisoners' conscience must have been, "This man has done nothing wrong."

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Blessing and judgment announced from a cell

The story turns here. Joseph, wronged and jailed, becomes the man who tells others what God has decided about them:

The righteous Joseph is charged with the sin his accuser was guilty of. The Gentile authority treats him as a criminal. His feet are put in the stocks, and the iron enters his soul. He is handed over to the Gentiles, and by them symbolically put to death. There he is the interpreter of restoring blessing and of fatal judgment. Earlier, the Lord's plan spoke of Messiah's rise to the highest place among His own Jewish people, and of His exaltation in principle. Here rejection and death come in — and with them the Lord's mind in saving and condemning the guilty, according to His true purposes.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Offence — Two officers anger their king. Scripture never says how. What matters is not their crime but where it lands them.

- Link — Their arrival in Joseph's prison is the second link in a chain God ordered. The first link was Joseph's own arrival there.

- Service — Slave, then criminal: Joseph keeps doing whatever needs doing. The Lord makes it prosper in each place of trial.

- Separation — The two men look alike in every outward way until Joseph speaks. Then one is saved and one is lost.

- Purpose — From a cell the innocent sufferer announces blessing and judgment. God guards his reputation, though the record never clears his name.

Genesis 40:2 · Darby

And Pharaoh was wroth with his two chamberlains -- with the chief of the cup-bearers and with the chief of the bakers;

Two of Egypt's most senior officials fall out of favour. The king's anger lands them in the prison where Joseph is already held. Why does Scripture pause over a palace quarrel — and what was God doing inside it?

Why the cupbearer and baker fell under suspicion

The text never says what the two men did wrong. One writer points out that the offence mattered less than the anger it provoked:

Two men are now committed to Joseph's care in the prison, the cupbearer and the baker of Pharaoh, king of Egypt. We are not told what offences they were imprisoned for, but they had incurred Pharaoh's anger, and that was enough.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer finds a likely reason in the offices these men held. They handled what the king drank and ate:

Both the chief butler and the chief baker of Pharaoh had offended their lord. Nothing is stated about the nature of their offence. But Pharaoh belonged to a foreign race, so he was likely to fear that someone would poison him. It is not surprising, then, that the two men in charge of his drink and his food had both fallen under suspicion.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Links in a chain

Read on its own, the arrest is palace politics. Read as part of the story, it is a move in something larger. The same writer counts the steps:

Until their case was decided, they were held in the same prison as Joseph and put in his charge. God ordered a chain of events. The first link was Joseph being put in the place where the king's prisoners were bound. The second was that in due time these two men should be placed there too.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

One writer traces the path and finds that every wrong done to Joseph was carrying him forward:

See how the trial of Joseph turned out. Divine ordering limited it from anything that would hinder it. It was intended to frustrate God's purpose, and seemed completely against it. Yet that trial and his righteous suffering in Egypt only brought about the very thing they seemed to frustrate. It was the Egypt his brothers sold him into, and the prison Potiphar put him in, that led him to the butler and baker — and that made him governor over all the land of Egypt. We cannot put God out of His way. It is better to trust Him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

God behind the scenes

One writer looks behind the human actors and sees two powers at work — one scheming, one ruling:

In Genesis 39 Satan uses Potiphar's wife, and in Genesis 40 he uses Pharaoh's chief butler. The first he used to put Joseph into the dungeon; the second he used to keep him there, through his ungrateful neglect. But it was all in vain. God was behind the scenes. His finger was guiding all the springs of the vast machine of circumstances, and when the right time came, He brought forth the man of His purpose and set his feet in a large room.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Joseph made their servant

Pharaoh's anger brought two noblemen down to a prisoner's level, and that prisoner served them:

Joseph had served as a slave in Potiphar's house. Now he served as a criminal in the tower-house, falsely accused of what was true of his accuser. But his faith stayed simple, peaceful and bright. We notice its effect on people who had no faith themselves, yet valued faithfulness highly. The captain gave him the care of the king's officers. As before in his master's house, so now in the governor's state prison, he became the responsible agent: whatever was to be done there, he did it. The Lord was with him in each place of trial, and whatever he did, the Lord made it prosper.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two prisoners, two destinies

The two men arrive together and share one sentence. One writer shows how alike they look:

Here were two men in the same place of imprisonment, both condemned. As far as we know they were equally guilty — or innocent — exactly alike in every outward appearance. Christ (Joseph) comes among them and pronounces one saved and the other lost.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer sees the same pairing as a picture of the cross:

So in Joseph in prison we see the suffering Christ. And we see two others suffering with him — Pharaoh's two officers, his chief butler and his chief baker. But they do not suffer as Joseph does. He suffered though innocent. They, in all likelihood, were receiving the due reward of their deeds, like the two thieves crucified with Christ.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Anger — Scripture never records the offence, only the king's anger. For these two men, that anger alone decided everything.

- Link — Joseph in the king's prison was the first link in a chain God ordered. These two officers arriving there was the second.

- Hand — Satan used Potiphar's wife to put Joseph in the dungeon, and Pharaoh's butler to keep him there. It was all in vain. God was behind the scenes, and at the right time He brought out the man of His purpose.

- Service — Set to serve fallen noblemen, Joseph did whatever needed doing. The Lord was with him there, as in Potiphar's house, and made his work prosper.

- Division — Two prisoners look identical in guilt and circumstance. Joseph comes among them, and one is pronounced saved, the other lost.

Genesis 40:3 · Darby

and he put them in custody into the house of the captain of the life-guard, into the tower-house, into the place where Joseph was imprisoned.

Two of Pharaoh's officials anger the king, and he jails them where Joseph is already held on a false charge. The verse looks like a small note about prison arrangements, yet it is the first link in a chain that will lift Joseph out of that dungeon.

Why These Two Men, in This Place

The text never says what the butler and the baker did wrong. One writer suggests a reason, and then sees the timing as no accident:

Both the chief butler and the chief baker of Pharaoh had offended their lord. We are not told what their offence was. But Pharaoh was of a foreign race, and so he was likely to fear that someone would poison him. No wonder both the chief keepers of his drink and his food had fallen under suspicion. While the king decided what to do, he confined them in the same prison as Joseph and put them in his charge. In the chain of events God ordered, the first link was Joseph being put in the place where the king's prisoners were bound. The second link was that in due time these two men were placed there too.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Prison Itself

The prison stood in the captain of the guard's own house, but it was no light place. One writer weighs what a long stretch there does to a man:

Have we not a saying in English, "The iron entered his soul"? Nothing is more depressing than captivity like that — day after day, night after night, summer and winter, year in and year out. The utter weariness, discomfort, sameness and hopelessness of it is a great test. Under it a character either collapses or shows what it is. Trials make or mar a man. They prove what a man is made of.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Who Was Really Arranging the Cells

The hands that put Joseph in prison could not keep him there. One writer names two of them, and points to who was working behind both:

In Genesis 39 Satan uses Potiphar's wife, and in Genesis 40 he uses Pharaoh's chief butler. The first he used to put Joseph into the dungeon; the second he used to keep him there, through his ungrateful forgetfulness — but all in vain. God was behind the scenes. His finger was guiding all the springs of the vast machine of circumstances. When the right time came, He brought out the man of His purpose and set his feet in a large room.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A Prisoner Who Ends Up Serving

The verse puts Joseph at the bottom. The chapter soon puts him in charge of the two new prisoners, and this had happened to him once before:

Joseph had served as a slave in Potiphar's house. Now he served as a criminal in the tower-house, falsely accused of what was true of his accuser. But his faith stayed simple, peaceful and bright. We can see its effect on men who had no faith themselves, yet highly valued faithfulness. The captain put Joseph in charge of the king's officials. In his master's house, and now in the governor's state prison, he became the responsible man. Whatever needed doing there, he did it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Innocent Man Among the Guilty

Writers see in this shared cell a picture of Christ between two criminals:

So in Joseph in prison we see the suffering Christ. And we see two others suffering with him — Pharaoh's two officers, his chief butler and his chief baker. But they do not suffer as Joseph does. He suffered though he was innocent. They, most likely, were receiving the "due reward of their deeds," like the two thieves crucified with Christ. Joseph was ruler in the dungeon. The verdict of his fellow prisoners' conscience must have been, "This man has done nothing wrong."

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

The two men look the same. Joseph's word is what separates them:

Here were two men in the same prison, both condemned alike. As far as we know they were equally guilty — or equally innocent. They looked just alike in every outward way. Christ (Joseph) comes among them and pronounces one saved and the other lost.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Link one. God puts Joseph where the king's prisoners are bound — the first link in a chain that ends with God bringing him out.

- Link two. Pharaoh sends the butler and baker to that same prison, under suspicion over his food and drink, and puts them in Joseph's care.

- Behind the links. Satan used a woman to jail Joseph and a butler to forget him. But God was behind the scenes, guiding every spring of it.

- Under the links. Iron and hopelessness test a man. Sameness and weariness either collapse a character or bring it out.

- Through the links. The innocent man jailed with the guilty becomes their servant. His word then divides them — one saved, one lost.

Genesis 40:4 · Darby

And the captain of the life-guard appointed Joseph to them, that he should attend on them. And they were [several] days in custody.

Joseph is in prison on a false charge. The captain of the guard now puts two of Pharaoh's senior officials in his care, and that small arrangement becomes the next link in a chain God is ordering.

Two officials, one unnamed captain

Two things in this verse stay open. We are not told why these men were jailed, and we cannot be sure who the captain was.

Two men are now placed in Joseph's care in the prison: the cupbearer and the baker of Pharaoh, king of Egypt. We are not told what offenses put them there. They had made Pharaoh angry, and that was enough. The captain of the bodyguard handed them over to Joseph. We may wonder whether this captain was Potiphar, who holds this position in Genesis 39:1, but there may well have been more than one captain.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

A chain being assembled

What reads like a routine prison assignment was one step in a sequence, and the order of the steps mattered.

While their case waited for a decision, they were held in the same prison as Joseph and put in his charge. The first link in this chain of events, ordered by God, was that Joseph should be in the place where the king's prisoners were held. The second was that at the right time these two men should be placed there too.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The same man in a lower place

Joseph had already run a household as a slave. In prison, accused of a crime, he is given the same kind of charge.

Joseph had served as a slave in Potiphar's house. Now he served as a criminal in the prison tower, falsely accused of what was in fact true of his accuser. But his faith stayed simple, peaceful and bright. We can see its effect on men who had no faith themselves, yet set a high value on faithfulness. The captain put the king's officials in Joseph's care. As in his master's house before, so now in the governor's state prison, he became the man in charge: whatever needed doing there, he did it. The LORD was with him in each place of trial, and what he did, the LORD made it prosper.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Usefulness that the walls cannot stop

The setting changed; Joseph's usefulness did not. One writer explains why, and why full rescue often comes slowly.

The man who truly leans on God makes good use of the trial he is in, whether it is short or lasting. No hard circumstances can crush true living energy. They may limit it and shape it. The scene may change, but the spirit of it does not. … Before long Joseph is as useful in prison as he was in the house of the captain of the guard. … In every trial, however dark, there are gleams of light and relief. But full deliverance is often delayed by our own anxiety to get it. God means to be the satisfaction of His servant, not the deliverance.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Kindness that outlasts being forgotten

Joseph's care for these two men went beyond duty. He was in chains himself, and their sadness still reached him.

Each of them had a dream fitted to his own case on the same night, yet they learned so little from it that the next morning both showed the same sadness to their kind and sympathetic attendant. He was in irons himself; but love rose above the evil, and flowed out freely.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

His kindness was repaid with silence. The cupbearer walked free and said nothing.

With the remarkable good sense that marks his character, he had begged not to be forgotten. But he stayed in irons a little longer. The word of the LORD tested him. God would work in His own way. If the chief cupbearer forgot Joseph once life went well for him, God did not.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The innocent man among the guilty

One writer sees more than history here. Joseph is placed alongside two condemned men, and the difference between him and them is the point.

So in Joseph in prison we see the suffering Christ. And we see two others suffering with him — Pharaoh's two officers, his chief butler and his chief baker. But they do not suffer as Joseph does. He suffered though he was innocent. They, in all likelihood, were receiving the "due reward of their deeds," like the two thieves crucified with Christ. Joseph was ruler in the dungeon, and the verdict of his fellow prisoners' conscience must have been, "This man has done nothing wrong."

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Assigned. The captain puts two of Pharaoh's officials under Joseph's care. Why they were jailed, and who this captain was, the verse never says.

- Linked. Joseph's imprisonment was the first link in a chain God was ordering. These two men arriving was the second.

- Unchanged. House or prison, Joseph is the man in charge — whatever needed doing, he did it, and God made it prosper.

- Satisfied. A man who leans on God makes good use of the trial he is in. God means to satisfy His servant Himself, not only to rescue him.

- Remembered. His love flowed out to men who would forget him — but if the cupbearer forgot Joseph, God did not.

Genesis 40:5 · Darby

And they dreamed a dream, both of them in one night, each his dream, each according to the interpretation of his dream, the cup-bearer and the baker of the king of Egypt, who were imprisoned in the tower-house.

Two disgraced court officials share a prison with a forgotten Hebrew slave. In one night each man dreams, and each dream carries its own meaning. Why trouble the sleep of two pagan servants, and why in that cell?

Not coincidence

Both men dreamed on the same night, and each dream fitted the man who dreamed it. Joseph read that as design, not luck.

That both should have dreamt characteristic dreams in one night he did not put down to what men call chance. They felt by instinct that the dreams were of the nearest interest to themselves, and no interpreter was there to explain them. If that made them sad, Joseph just as simply reckoned that interpretations belong to God, the giver of every good gift and of every perfect giving.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God at a pagan king's bedside

God is not at work only among His own people. He is at work inside Egyptian homes, and in Egyptian sleep.

God visits the family circle of a pagan captain, and the household of a pagan king — yes, and his bedside. He makes the very visions of his head upon his bed serve the working out of His counsels. And it is not only people and their circumstances that God takes up and uses for His ends. He brings Egypt and all the surrounding countries into the scene too. In short, God's hand prepared the whole earth to be a stage on which to display the glory and greatness of the one "who was set apart from his brothers."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What a dream was in Joseph's story

Dreams run through this whole history, and each one carried a message about the future.

Dreams played a remarkably large part in his history. Before the climax, the record gives no less than five, and every one of them contained a prophecy. The finger of God produced each of them, touching the sleeper's unconscious mind. Each marked a divine intervention — indeed a revelation of secret things.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

That does not make every dream a message. Commentators mark the difference between then and now.

In the ages before Moses there was no written revelation of His will. God often took this way to communicate His mind, or to reveal coming events beforehand… Now we have His written revelation, the completed Bible. Only in very rare and exceptional cases can we recognise a dream as having come from God. "For a dream comes with much business" (Ecclesiastes 5:3) — that is, from purely natural causes, Scripture says.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

One link in a chain

This night of dreams is one step in an ordered series.

God ordered a chain of events. The first link was that Joseph should be in the place where the king's prisoners were bound. The second was that in due time these two men should be placed there too. The third was that both men should have dreams in one night, unusual in kind yet marked by certain resemblances. Their effect on the two minds should be such as to make them look sad and attract Joseph's notice.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Joseph's trial went on while God forged that chain.

God had tried His dear child, and would try him longer. Yet this was an honour to Joseph, who was given not only to believe but to suffer for His sake. But God was forming the chain of links that would raise the suffering Israelite out of the dungeon. It would lift him to the highest position in Egypt, next to the throne. The dream of the chief cup-bearer was an important link in that chain.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two troubled men and a prisoner who noticed

The dreams left both men uneasy and no wiser. Joseph carried the deeper hurt, yet he was the one who noticed theirs.

Joseph's own dreams had disclosed much while he was a young free man in his father's house, and they drew out the envious spite of his brothers. Now grace gave him the opportunity of light from above on the dreams of his fellow-prisoners. Each had a fitting dream the same night, but they learned so little from it. The next morning their faces showed the same sadness to their gracious and sympathetic attendant. His own suffering had cut deep into him; but love rose above evil, and flowed out readily.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The wisdom that shone in the lowest place

Commentators read this scene as a picture of Christ, and of where true wisdom was found.

In all this Joseph pictured Christ, who shone to the eye of faith in His humiliation with a grace even beyond glory. He was clearly the wisdom of God. Human wisdom, next to Him, proved itself utterly weak, foolish and malicious.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Bedside — God reached into a pagan king's household and used the visions of men on their beds to advance His plans.

- No chance — two fitting dreams in one night were not luck. Interpretations belong to God, and Joseph read the night as His work.

- Link — Joseph in that prison, the two officials sent there, then the dreams. Each is a link in one chain that runs from the dungeon to a place next to the throne.

- Sadness — the dreams left both men troubled and no wiser. The wronged prisoner was the one whose love flowed out first.

- Then and now — before the written Scriptures God often spoke through dreams. Now the Bible is complete, and a dream from God is a rare exception.

Genesis 40:6 · Darby

And Joseph came in to them in the morning, and looked on them, and behold, they were sad.

Joseph is in prison for a crime he never committed. Two of Pharaoh's officials have just been thrown in beside him. This verse catches him at daybreak, noticing the look on their faces. That small act of attention turns his whole future.

The two prisoners

We are never told what the butler and the baker did wrong. Their jobs suggest a reason. One writer sets their arrival in a chain God was arranging.

Pharaoh's chief cupbearer and his chief baker had both offended their master. Nothing is said about what they did wrong. But Pharaoh came of a foreign race, so he was likely to fear an attempt on his life by poison. No wonder the two men in charge of his drink and his food fell under suspicion. Until the case was decided, they were held in the same prison as Joseph, and put in his charge. The first link in the chain of events God had ordered was that Joseph should be put where the king's prisoners were held. The second was that in due time these two men should be put there too.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The same writer counts the troubled faces of this verse as the next link in that chain:

The third was that both men should have dreams on the same night. The dreams were strange, yet alike in certain ways. They affected the men's minds so much that they looked sad, and Joseph noticed it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A man who noticed

Joseph had every reason to think only of his own case. What he did instead shows the kind of man he was.

The common idea of Joseph seems to be this: everyone would say he was a good young man, but they would mean a "goody" young man, and a bit soft. Read his history with ordinary attention, though, and you trace a character that is nothing of the kind. It is strong, wise, noble, generous, manly and big-hearted… When he is punished for his honourable conduct by being thrown into the dungeon, his words to his fellow-prisoners are, "Do not interpretations belong to God?" He did not complain under that great trouble. He looked around to see what he could do to help others, even his jailers. He could not see his companions in misery losing heart without asking, "Why are your faces downcast today?"

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why their faces fell

Their sadness was not simply prison gloom. They had dreamed, and they sensed that the dreams carried a verdict they could not read.

They are sad because they do not understand their dreams. They seem to have felt that their dreams were somehow connected with their destiny. And because they are not sure what that destiny is to be, they are "sad." And well they might be. And some of you are sad tonight for the same reason — you do not know your destiny. Many more ought to be sad, and are not. You do not know that you are saved, and so you do not know where you will spend eternity. While that question stays unsettled, it is folly to be anything but sad.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Love that rose above his own chains

Each man had a dream fitted to him on the same night, and still they learned nothing from it. Joseph had once had dreams of his own, and now grace used him to open theirs.

Joseph's own dreams had revealed much while he was a young free man in his father's house, and they drew out the envious spite of his brothers. Now grace gave him the opportunity of light from above on the dreams of his fellow-prisoners. Each man had a dream fitted to him on the same night, yet they learned so little from it that their faces showed the same sadness to their gracious and sympathetic attendant the next morning. He himself had felt the iron; but love rose above the evil, and flowed out readily.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Useful in prison

Joseph's care for two worried men was not a one-off. He did the same in every place he landed.

The one who really leans on God improves the circumstances of trial he is in, whether they are temporary or permanent. No hostile circumstances can crush true living energy; they may limit and shape it. The scene may change, but not the spirit of it… Joseph too was soon as useful in prison as he had been in the house of the captain of the guard… In every trial, however gloomy, there are gleams of light and relief. But full deliverance is often delayed by our anxiety to get it. God is to be the satisfaction of His servant, and not the deliverance.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Chain — Joseph's imprisonment, the officials' arrest and their troubled faces were links God was arranging. No one in that cell could see where the chain led.

- Morning — Joseph did not complain about his own trouble. He looked around for someone to help, even his jailers.

- Sadness — The two men were downcast because they felt their dreams held their destiny, and they could not read it. Many people carry the same unsettled question about eternity.

- Love — He had felt the iron himself, yet love rose above the evil and flowed out readily to men who could not read their own dreams.

- Usefulness — A person who leans on God improves the trial he is in. The scene may change, but not the spirit of it. And God Himself, not release, is meant to satisfy His servant.

Genesis 40:7 · Darby

And he asked Pharaoh's chamberlains that were with him in custody in his lord's house, saying, Why are your faces [so] sad to-day?

A false charge has put Joseph in an Egyptian prison, where two of Pharaoh's servants come under his care. He sees their sad faces and asks why — a small question that turns the whole story.

Faithful wherever he serves

Joseph had already served well in one house and lost it. In prison the pattern repeats: his place changes, his faith does not.

Joseph had served as a slave in Potiphar's house. Now he served as a criminal in the prison tower, falsely accused of what was true of his accuser. But his faith remained simple, peaceful, and bright. We note its effect on those who had no faith themselves, yet valued faithfulness highly. The captain put the king's officers in his care. As before in his master's house, so now in the governor's prison, he became the man in charge: whatever needed doing there, he did it. The Lord was with him in each place of trial, and the Lord made what he did prosper.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A man who noticed

The verse shows Joseph reading faces. One writer uses this to correct the common picture of Joseph as a soft, passive young man.

Read the history with ordinary attention, and we can trace a character far from soft or weak. At heart it is strong, wise, noble, generous, manly and big-hearted… Punished for his honourable conduct with the dungeon, he says to his fellow prisoners, "Do not interpretations belong to God?" He did not complain under that great disaster. Instead he looks around to see what he can do to help others, even his jailers. He cannot see his companions in misery losing heart without asking, "Why are your faces downcast today?"

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Turning to someone else's trouble does something to your own.

If we knew more of Christ's sympathies, the children of God might have more for one another. If you are full of sorrow yourself, go and sympathize with another, and your own will be gone.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Sympathy first, then power

Joseph is still in prison when he starts caring for others. One writer sees in that order the way God deals with His people.

In His way with His chosen ones, God's sympathy comes first, and then His power. The sympathy goes with them through their sorrow. The power then delivers them out of it. We are inclined to want ease now, and would sweep away every inconvenience and contradiction at once. But this is not His way. At Bethany "Jesus wept," and afterwards, but not until afterwards, He said, "Lazarus, come out."

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

A link in a chain

The sad faces were no accident. One writer counts them as the third link in a chain.

The third was that both men should have dreams on the same night, of an unusual kind and yet alike in certain ways. The effect on their minds should be such that they looked sad and caught Joseph's notice. They felt there must be a hidden meaning in their dreams, and they wanted an interpreter. Joseph's reply was in effect an offer to interpret, while he acknowledged that all power to do so came from God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Service that prepares for glory

Nothing in the prison was wasted. One writer reads Joseph's kindness to two forgotten men as part of his training.

Every trial he passes through is only a stage in the path that leads to glory: the treatment from his brothers, the slavery in the Egyptian's house, the false accusations of Potiphar's wife, the prison of Pharaoh, the neglect of Pharaoh's cupbearer. His work as a shepherd, his mission to his brothers, his service in Potiphar's house and in Pharaoh's prison are all preparing him to use power in the day of his glory. The service in the trials prepares for the right use of glory.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

And the picture points beyond Joseph. In prison he shows himself as the interpreter of God's mind, and that is what fits him to hand out the wealth of Egypt's throne. One writer sees here a shadow of "the lowly Minister to human need" who comes out of humiliation "to serve as the Wisdom and Power of God upon a throne of grace" (F. W. Grant).

Summary

- Faithful — jailed on a false charge, Joseph still did whatever needed doing. His faith stayed "simple, peaceful, and bright," and unbelieving men noticed.

- Attentive — he did not complain. He looked around for someone to help, and read the need in their faces.

- Sympathy — God's way is sympathy through the sorrow first, power out of it afterwards. Joseph gives what he is receiving.

- Opened — the question invited their dreams, and the dreams became a link in the chain that led to the throne.

- Prepared — service in the trial trains the hand that will later hold the glory. Christ completes the pattern.

Genesis 40:8 · Darby

And they said to him, We have dreamt a dream, and there is no interpreter of it. And Joseph said to them, [Do] not interpretations [belong] to God? tell me [your dreams], I pray you.

Joseph is in prison for a crime he never committed. Two of Pharaoh's officers wake up disturbed by dreams no one can explain. His answer moves the question. The problem is not a shortage of skilled dream-readers. Meaning itself is God's to give.

No human key

The two men are looking for a specialist. Joseph does not offer himself as one.

Joseph did not claim to be an expert at interpreting dreams. Instead he told them, "Do not interpretations belong to God?" By saying this he showed them where any answer must come from. They had to depend on God Himself to reveal it. But he asks them to tell him their dreams.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Dreams with a sender

Joseph's question assumes these dreams carry a message. Not every dream does.

These dreams of the butler and the baker were "according to the interpretation." Those words imply that they came from God. For dreams have two sources: either God sends them, or they come from the press of business. In them God may reveal His mind, or they may be simply various empty things, the fruit of our own passions or needs.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Where the two men saw a dead end, Joseph saw a giver.

Both men dreamed dreams true to their own case on one night. Joseph did not put that down to what people call chance. They were sad because no interpreter could explain what they felt closely concerned them. Joseph just as simply reckoned that interpretations belong to God. He is the giver of every good gift and of every perfect giving. So He is the One who answers faith's cry to Him, though no other ear hears it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Wisdom drawn from above, not from talent

So where did Joseph's insight come from?

God gave Joseph the discerning ear... In no way is the credit given to mere natural intelligence. The secret of the LORD is with those who fear Him. Joseph's faith was always in use. He knew that God stays the same in the middle of heavy trials — trials that had only changed from one great sorrow into a greater one. At his lowest point he looked up for wisdom to its only source. God's power then called him to solve the riddle, for good or for ill, in the cases that came before him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The man who noticed other people's faces

Joseph's answer follows a question he asked first: why did their faces look downcast? A wrongly jailed man asked it.

Wherever he was found, God was in all his thoughts... They punished him for his honourable conduct and threw him into the dungeon. Even there his words to his fellow prisoners are, "Interpretations belong to God." He did not complain under that great disaster. He looked around to see what he could do to help others, even his jailers. He could not see his companions in misery losing heart and say nothing. He asked them, "Why are your faces downcast today?"

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A greater Interpreter

Joseph turns the credit away at the very moment he could take it. Commentators hear an echo of that in Christ.

Jesus did not honour Himself. "Do not interpretations belong to God?" said Joseph. "My teaching is not mine, but His who sent me," said Jesus. Jesus was obedient, and therefore God has highly exalted Him.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Others press the setting itself — a rejected man is the one who explains God's mind.

All through this the Lord was with him. Yet men rejected him and forgot him completely, like a dead man out of mind. It is as one rejected that he becomes the interpreter. There is no true interpretation without the cross. It is there that God's interpretation has its place... All the interpretation is bound up with the low estate of Joseph.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same principle for our own future

The two officers wanted to know what lay ahead. So do we.

Joseph says to the downcast butler and baker, "Do not interpretations belong to God?" God must reveal everything any of us can know about these things. And He has revealed how anyone may know where he will spend eternity. His Word, the Bible, gives us a perfect picture of our destiny.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Belongs. Meaning is God's property. No expert can supply it, and the lack of one cannot withhold it.

- Given. What belongs to God, He gives. Joseph credits nothing to his own cleverness. The answer comes from the giver of every good gift.

- Received. The gift reaches a man whose faith was in constant use and who looked up for wisdom at his lowest point, in a dungeon.

- Shared. He spends the gift on others. He noticed two sad faces before he explained a single dream, instead of complaining about his own case.

- Fulfilled. The rejected interpreter points to Christ. He too said the teaching was not His own, and God exalted Him after His obedience.

Genesis 40:9 · Darby

Then the chief of the cup-bearers told his dream to Joseph, and said to him, In my dream, behold, a vine was before me;

A cupbearer sits in an Egyptian prison, troubled by a dream he cannot read. He tells it to a fellow prisoner everyone has forgotten, and that man alone can say what the vine means.

God at work behind a prison wall

The chapter looks like a small household matter in a royal court. Commentators see God reaching even into the king's bedroom to move His plans forward.

In the scripture now before us, all this is seen in a most remarkable manner. God visits the home of a pagan captain, and the household of a pagan king — yes, even his bedside. He makes even the dreams in the king's head on his bed serve the working out of His plans.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Where the meaning comes from

Two prisoners woke up sad, with no one to explain their dreams. Joseph's answer pointed them away from human skill.

They were sad because no one could explain what they felt concerned them most. Joseph, just as simply, reckoned that interpretations belong to God, the giver of every good gift and every perfect gift. So He is the answerer of faith's cry to Him, though unheard by any other ear.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Joseph's own dreams had once brought him nothing but trouble from his brothers. Now the same gift serves two strangers in chains.

And as in Joseph's dreams much had been divulged, while he was a young freeman in his father's house, which drew out the envious spite of his brothers, grace gave him now the opportunity of light from above on the dreams of his fellow prisoners... His soul entered into the iron; but love rose superior to evil, and flowed out readily.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A vine that buds, blossoms and ripens at once

The butler watches bud, blossom and ripe grapes appear at once, then squeezes them into the king's cup. No vineyard works that way.

No one expects a vision like this to keep to real time or real place. A dream can crowd the events of months or years into a single scene. Here the vine buds, blossoms and yields grapes, and the wine is fit for a king's cup. History records nothing so fast in the hands of a cupbearer, with no winepress, no vat, and no storing in jars.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Three branches, three days

Joseph does not hedge. He names a number and a deadline, and the accuracy of it is the point.

The striking point Joseph was given to grasp is the precision of the three days marked by the three branches. No interpreter among Egypt's priests would have dared to say, as Joseph did at once, "The three branches are three days. In three days Pharaoh will lift up your head and restore you to your office." A guess would more likely have said three months. But no. The secret of the Lord is with those who fear Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer explains what it meant for Pharaoh to "lift up his head."

"The three branches are three days," he says (v.12), and within three days Pharaoh would "lift up his head," that is, bring him into public view, and restore him to his office of cupbearer.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The vine, the pressed grapes, and the cup

Writers also see a picture here. Someone must crush the grapes before the cup is filled.

In the passage above the grapes were pressed. We might well think of the Lord's death and the awful pressure when He was made sin... God has accepted sinners because of that finished work, which glorified Him. The butler, as we see, was restored to his position again. We who were guilty are justified before God. If we wish to extend the type further, maybe the three branches would remind us of Christ's resurrection. Justification is in a risen Saviour. The dream of the baker tells us that salvation is not by works; he was not restored to his position, but was executed.

Modernised from George BellOriginal wording

The cup in Pharaoh's hand

Writers see the butler's part in the dream as a picture of a guilty man's place before God.

The dream sets the butler before a vine with three branches, living and fruitful. Pharaoh's cup — the symbol of God's judgment (Psalm 75:7-8) — is in his hand. He takes the grapes, presses them into the cup, and gives the cup into Pharaoh's hands. That is, the man takes his place before Christ, the true Vine. He accepts God's judgment and offers the blood of Christ, measured by that judgment. God accepts it, and the man is forgiven and exalted.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how far to press the picture. Some read the dream as history and providence. Others see Christ Himself in the vine and the cup.

Summary

- Source — Joseph claims no skill of his own. He tells the two prisoners that interpretations belong to God.

- Sign — The dream packs bud, blossom and ripe grapes into one moment. No real vineyard grows that way, so this is a message, not a memory.

- Precision — "Three branches are three days" is a risk no guesser would take. A guess would have said three months. The exactness points to God.

- Substance — Crushed grapes fill the cup, and the king accepts it. Writers see the death of Christ here, and the restored butler pictures guilty people justified.

- Separation — One dream ends in restoring, the other in execution. The vine saves; a man's own work does not.

Genesis 40:10 · Darby

and in the vine were three branches; and it was as though it budded its blossoms shot forth, its clusters ripened into grapes.

Joseph is in an Egyptian prison. Two of Pharaoh's officers are shut up with him, troubled by dreams no one can explain. The chief cupbearer tells his first: a vine, three branches, and a whole season of growth in one moment.

A Dream Sent by God in an Everyday Form

Nothing in the picture would surprise a man who served wine at court. What is strange is the speed. One writer notes that visions often crowd time like this:

God often works by simple means, as here by a dream that came very naturally to this official of Pharaoh's court. Yet it was truly prophetic; and only a prophet was able to give its clear meaning. Here the wisdom of God was as evident as in sending the dream. No one expects such a vision to keep to real time or to one place. It may crowd the events of months, or years, into a single scene, as with the vine budding and blossoming and yielding grapes, and wine fit for a king's cup.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Some readers once doubted that vines grew in Egypt at all:

People used to object that there were no vines in Egypt, because Herodotus says so. In recent years many carvings of vines have been found on the monuments there.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Three Branches, Three Days

Joseph does not hedge. Three branches mean three days — not months, not years. Such exactness does not come from a clever guess:

The remarkable point which Joseph was given to seize is the precision of the three days indicated by the three branches. No Egyptian priest who read dreams would have dared to say at once, as Joseph did, "The three branches are three days." A guess would more likely have made them three months. But no. The secret of the Lord is with those who fear Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The First Vine in Scripture

The vine appears here for the first time in the Bible. The clusters do not stay whole — they are crushed. One writer reads that pressing as a picture of the cross:

The first mention of the vine in Scripture is in Genesis 40. In every step of the life of the Son of God He glorified the Father, and it was also true in His death. In the passage above the grapes were pressed. We might very well think of the Lord's death and the awful pressure when He was made sin. Gethsemane means the "winepress", but there it was suffering in anticipation. What can we say of the cross itself? Sinners have been accepted because of that finished work which glorified God. The cupbearer, as we see, was restored to his position again. We who were guilty are justified before God. If we want to take the picture further, perhaps the three branches would remind us of Christ's resurrection. Justification is in a risen Saviour.

Modernised from George BellOriginal wording

A Living, Fruitful Vine and a Cup

The dream moves from the vine to the king's cup. One writer reads the cup as God's judgment and the vine as Christ:

The cupbearer is brought before a vine, triple branched, living and fruitful. Pharaoh's cup (the symbol of God's judgment, Psalm 75:7-8) is in his hand. He takes the grapes, presses them into the cup, and then gives the cup into Pharaoh's hands. That is, the man takes his place in the presence of Christ, the true Vine. Accepting God's judgment, he offers the blood of Christ, according to the measure of that judgment. God accepts it, and the man is forgiven and exalted.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What the Cupbearer Saw and the Baker Did Not

The second prisoner dreamed too. One dream shows something already provided. The other shows only what a man made himself:

The chief cupbearer sees in his dream what speaks of the blood — the juice of the grape. And he was delivered. The chief baker dreams of what at once reminds us of human righteousness, the white baskets. He saw only what he had laboured to produce, the baked goods. And he is hanged. The chief cupbearer sees something ready to his hand, the grape clusters, and he presents them to Pharaoh as the blood of the grape. Here we have "the only two religions" pictured — the one that makes everything depend on the blood of Jesus, and the one that ignores the blood and trusts human righteousness.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Where We Go for Meaning Now

Joseph needed a dream. Readers today have something steadier:

We too may have dreams... But as believers, and especially as Christians, we have far better than hints as vague as those. We have the Scriptures in all their fullness. They reveal God — His counsels, work, will, and ways — from eternity to eternity. We have also the Holy Spirit, sent from the Father and the Son in heaven, never to leave but to stay with us and in us. He guides us into all the truth, and tells us the things to come, glorifying our Lord Jesus in both.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Vine. The Bible's first vine grows here, in a prisoner's dream, budding and fruiting in a single rush.

- Pressed. The clusters are not admired but crushed. One writer reads that pressing as the cross; Gethsemane itself means "winepress."

- Cup. The crushed fruit goes into the cup of judgment, and God accepts it there. That is how a guilty man is forgiven and lifted up.

- Received. The cupbearer's dream shows something ready to his hand; The baker's shows only his own work. These are the only two religions.

- Three. Three branches meant three days, said without hesitation, because the meaning belonged to God. Today that meaning reaches us through Scripture and the Spirit, not through dreams.

Genesis 40:11 · Darby

And Pharaoh's cup was in my hand; and I took the grapes, and pressed them into Pharaoh's cup, and gave the cup into Pharaoh's hand.

Joseph sits in prison on a false charge. Pharaoh's chief cupbearer tells him a dream: a vine, three branches, ripe grapes, and a cup handed back to the king. The picture is simple, yet commentators find the gospel in it — and they ask first why God sent such a dream to a foreign official at all.

The dream in outline

One writer sets out the parts of the dream as three linked steps, each carrying the story forward.

The butler told his dream. Its main points were: (1) that the vine had three branches, which produced the ripe grapes; (2) that Pharaoh's cup was in his hand, so that he could press into it the ripe grapes; and (3) that the cup of grape juice passed into Pharaoh's hand. The interpretation was simple. Within three days Pharaoh would restore the butler to his place.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A vision, not a record of nature

Nothing in a vineyard moves this fast. Budding, blossom, ripe fruit and pressed wine all arrive in one breath — which tells you what kind of scene this is.

God often works by simple means, as here by such a dream as fell very naturally to this official of Pharaoh's court. Yet it was truly prophetic; and only a prophet was able to give its clear meaning. Here the wisdom of God was as evident as in sending the dream. No one looks for unity of time and place in such a vision. A vision can crowd the events of months, or years, into a single scene: the vine budding, blossoming and yielding grapes, and wine fit for a king's cup. No one ever heard of so fast a result in the hands of a cupbearer, with no winepress, no vat, and no storing in jars.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer adds that we have no ground to assume the cup held plain grape juice rather than fermented wine. He calls it a small point.

The precision of the interpretation

Joseph gives no cautious guess. He ties the three branches to three days, and one writer traces that exactness back to God.

The remarkable point which Joseph was given to seize is the precision of the three days indicated by the three branches. No priestly interpreter in Egypt would have ventured to say, as Joseph did at once, "The three branches are three days. In three days Pharaoh will lift up your head and restore you to your office." If it were a guess, three months might have been more likely; but no. The secret of the Lord is with those who fear Him. Even more was given here: God's work in Joseph's own spirit, and the divine wisdom that sent the vision to the Egyptian official. Interpretation of what God says or does belongs to God. He gives it as He wills, and as a rule to those whom He loves, even in circumstances of the deepest humiliation. In this Joseph pictured what was true of the Lord Himself here on earth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The pressing of the grapes

Grapes give nothing until the press crushes them. One writer follows that crushing to the cross, and the butler's restoration to the believer's standing before God.

In every step of the life of the Son of God He glorified the Father, and it was also true in His death. In the passage above the grapes were pressed. We might well think of the Lord's death and the terrible pressure when He was made sin. Gethsemane means the "winepress," but there it was suffering in anticipation. What can we say of the cross itself? Sinners have been accepted because of that finished work which glorified God. The butler, as we see, was restored to his position again. We who were guilty are justified before God. If we wish to extend the type further, perhaps the three branches would remind us of Christ's resurrection. Justification is in a risen Saviour.

Modernised from George BellOriginal wording

The cup placed in the king's hand

The cup in the cupbearer's hand belongs to the king. One writer reads that cup as the symbol of God's judgment, and the filling and handing back as the sinner's answer to it.

The butler is brought before a vine with three branches, living and fruitful. Pharaoh's cup (the symbol of God's judgment, Psalm 75:7-8) is in his hand. He takes the grapes and presses them into the cup, and then gives the cup into Pharaoh's hands. That is, the man takes his place in the presence of Christ, the true Vine. He accepts God's judgment and offers the blood of Christ, according to the measure of that judgment. God accepts it, and the man is forgiven and lifted up.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why the baker's dream ends differently

Two men, two dreams, two opposite outcomes. The difference is in what each one had to present.

The chief butler sees something ready to his hand, the grape clusters. He makes use of them and presents them to Pharaoh as the blood of the grape. The birds devour the offering of the baker. Here we have a picture of "the only two religions." One makes everything depend on the blood of Jesus. The other ignores the blood and trusts human righteousness.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Fruit — a vine that buds, blossoms and ripens in one moment is not gardening but prophecy. A vision packs months into one scene.

- Pressed — grapes give nothing until the press crushes them. That crushing points to the cross, where the Son of God glorified the Father in death.

- Cup — Pharaoh's cup stands for God's judgment. The cupbearer fills it with what the vine gave, not with anything of his own.

- Accepted — the king takes the cup back and receives it. The man is forgiven and lifted up, and justification rests on a risen Saviour.

- Contrast — the baker offers what his own work produced, and loses everything. These are the only two religions there have ever been.

Genesis 40:12 · Darby

And Joseph said to him, This is the interpretation of it the three branches are three days.

Two of Pharaoh's officials sit in the same prison as Joseph, each disturbed by a dream nobody can explain. Joseph answers at once and names an exact number of days — so the first question is how he knew.

The Source of the Meaning

Joseph claims nothing for himself. One writer points to the precision of the answer:

The remarkable point Joseph was given to grasp is the precision of the three days shown by the three branches. No priestly interpreter in Egypt would have dared to say, as Joseph did at once, "The three branches are three days. In three days Pharaoh will lift up your head and restore you to your office." If it were a guess, three months would have been more likely; but no. The secret of Jehovah is with those who fear Him. Even more was given here: God's work in Joseph's spirit, and the divine wisdom that sent the dream to the Egyptian official. Interpretation of what God says or does belongs to God. He gives it as He will, and as a rule to those whom He loves, even in circumstances of the deepest humiliation. In this Joseph aptly pictured what was true of the blessed Lord Himself here below.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Words of the Promise

Joseph goes on to say that Pharaoh will "lift up your head." One writer explains both halves of the answer:

Joseph, in communion with the mind of God, had no difficulty in interpreting this dream. "The three branches are three days," he says. Within three days Pharaoh would "lift up his head" — that is, bring him into public view — and restore him to his office of cupbearer.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

A Prisoner Who Looks Outward

Joseph is in the dungeon because he refused to sin. Notice what he does with that injustice:

Wherever he was found, God was in all his thoughts: when tempted, he said, "How can I... sin against God?" When brought to Pharaoh, his first words are, "God shall give..."... When he is punished for his honourable conduct and thrown into the dungeon, his words to his fellow prisoners are, "Interpretations belong to God." He did not complain under that great calamity. He looks about to see what he can do to help others, even his jailors. He cannot see his companions in misery losing heart without asking, "Why do you look so sad today?"

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Vine and the Cup

Writers also read the two dreams as pictures. Read that way, the cupbearer's vine carries the gospel:

The butler is brought before a vine, triple branched, living and fruitful. Pharaoh's cup (the symbol of God's judgment, Psalm 75:7-8) is in his hand; he takes the grapes and presses them into the cup, and then gives the cup into Pharaoh's hands. That is, the man takes his place in the presence of Christ, the true Vine. Accepting God's judgment, he offers the blood of Christ, according to the measure of that judgment. God accepts the offering, and the man is forgiven and exalted.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The other prisoner dreams of what his own hands produced. Set side by side, the two dreams divide every religion ever attempted into two:

The chief butler sees in his dream what speaks of the blood — the juice of the grape. And he was delivered. The chief baker dreams of what at once reminds us of human righteousness, the white baskets. He saw only what he had laboured to produce, the baked goods. And he is hanged... The birds of the air devour the baker's offering. Here we have "the only two religions" pictured. One makes everything depend on the blood of Jesus. The other ignores the blood and trusts human righteousness.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Three Days, Two Destinies

From the outside the two men looked the same: same prison, same sentence, same night of dreaming. The same interpreter gives each of them a verdict:

Here were two men in the same place of bondage, both condemned. So far as we know, both were equally guilty — or innocent. They were just alike in all outward appearance. Christ (Joseph) comes among them and pronounces one saved and the other lost.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Both verdicts land on the same day:

There were "three days" in each case: death and resurrection delivers one and condemns the other.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Source. Joseph does not read dreams; God gives meaning, and He gives it to a man in the deepest humiliation.

- Precision. Three branches meant three days, not months. No interpreter in Egypt would have risked such an exact answer.

- Service. Jailed unjustly, Joseph does not complain. He looks around for someone to help, starting with the sad faces of fellow prisoners.

- Cup. The grapes pressed into the king's cup picture the blood of Christ meeting God's judgment, and God accepts it. The baker's baskets picture human work, and the birds eat it.

- Division. Two men alike in every outward way hear opposite verdicts on the same third day. Death and resurrection delivers one and condemns the other.

Genesis 40:13 · Darby

In yet three days will Pharaoh lift up thy head and restore thee to thy place, and thou shalt deliver Pharaoh's cup into his hand, after the former manner when thou wast his cup-bearer.

Joseph is a prisoner himself when the chief cupbearer tells him his dream. His answer is not a cautious guess but a dated promise. Where did that certainty come from, and what do the vine, the cup and the three days mean?

"Lift Up Your Head"

One writer ties the branches to the days and explains what the raised head means:

Joseph, in communion with the mind of God, had no difficulty in interpreting this dream. "The three branches are three days," he says (v. 12). Within three days Pharaoh would "lift up his head" — that is, bring him into public view — and restore him to his office of cupbearer.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Where the Certainty Came From

Joseph names a deadline, not a vague forecast. One writer traces that precision to God:

The remarkable point God gave Joseph to seize is the precision of the three days marked by the three branches. No priestly interpreter in Egypt would have dared to say at once, as Joseph did, "In three days Pharaoh will lift up your head and restore you to your office." A guess would more likely have said three months; but no. The secret of Jehovah is with those who fear Him... Interpretation of what God says or does belongs to God. He gives it as He will, and as a rule to those whom He loves, even in circumstances of the deepest humiliation. For in this Joseph was a fitting picture of what proved true in the Lord Jesus Himself here on earth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Vine, the Cup, the Third Day

Commentators also read the details of the dream as a picture of the gospel:

There is striking spiritual significance in this dream. The three days remind us of the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus. The juice of the grapes stands for the shedding of His blood. He endured the suffering pictured by the winepress. His blood was shed as the only means of forgiveness of sins. So the guilty sinner is set free from his guilt and bondage, and it all rests on the value of the blood of Christ. The cupbearer then pictures the sinner saved by the shedding of the blood of Christ.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

In the dream the man does not keep the cup; he fills it and hands it back to the king:

The dream sets the butler before a vine with three branches, living and fruitful. Pharaoh's cup is in his hand, the symbol of God's judgment (Psalm 75:7-8). He takes the grapes, presses them into the cup, and gives the cup into Pharaoh's hands. That is, the man takes his place in the presence of Christ, the true Vine. Accepting God's judgment, he offers the blood of Christ, in the measure of that judgment. God accepts it, and the man is forgiven and exalted.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Two Prisoners, One Interpreter

The other prisoner in the same cell heard the opposite verdict. Nothing outward marked the two men apart:

Here were two men in the same prison, both condemned, and, so far as we know, both guilty — or both innocent. From the outside they looked just alike. Christ (Joseph) comes among them and pronounces one saved and the other lost.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What divided them was the content of each dream:

We see the gospel pictured in these dreams. The chief butler sees in his dream what speaks of the blood (the juice of the grape). And he was delivered. The chief baker, on the other hand, dreams of what at once reminds us of human righteousness, the white baskets. He saw only what he had laboured to produce, the baked goods. And he is hanged... Here we have "the only two religions" pictured. One makes everything depend on the blood of Jesus. The other ignores the blood and trusts human righteousness.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Fulfilled, Then Forgotten

The next three days settled it. One writer sees God's hand even in what followed:

The event proved that God had given Joseph's interpretations. Pharaoh's birthday was on the third day, and he acted as the dreams had indicated. Yet the chief butler in his renewed prosperity forgot about Joseph, and has become a standing monument of human ingratitude. Still, as we believe, the hand of God was over even this. If the butler had remembered, thankful and perhaps respectful human arrangement would have freed Joseph from prison. God intended to take him out, reviving the butler's memory, in a far more striking way.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Word. "Lift up your head" means Pharaoh will bring the man back into public view and restore him to his old office.

- Source. The three-day deadline was no guess. Interpretation belongs to God, and He gives it even to a man in deep humiliation.

- Picture. The three days point to death and resurrection. The pressed grapes point to blood shed — the only means of forgiveness.

- Divide. Two prisoners look alike, yet one is saved and the other lost. One dream holds blood; the other holds human effort.

- Result. The promise came true to the day. Even the cupbearer's ingratitude stayed under God's hand, keeping a greater rescue for Joseph.

Genesis 40:14 · Darby

Only bear a remembrance with thee of me when it goes well with thee, and deal kindly, I pray thee, with me, and make mention of me to Pharaoh, and bring me out of this house;

Joseph sits in prison for a crime he never committed, and he has just told Pharaoh's cupbearer that his old job is coming back. With that good news Joseph adds a plea for himself, and commentators read it two ways: as a fair, blameless request, or as a reach for human help when God alone was his resource.

What Joseph asked for

Joseph made his plea to only one of the two prisoners, and what he asked for was narrow.

Yet Joseph must have known the grave fate that would soon fall on the chief baker. So notice that he made no appeal to him to be remembered. He said only to the chief cupbearer, "Only remember me, when it is well with you, and please do me the kindness to mention me to Pharaoh, and so get me out of this house." There was nothing random in his words. He had no selfish wish for the royal favours that men look for. He asked only for release from the mockery of justice that fell on a righteous man through lust that was refused and through lies.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Leaning on human help

Other writers question the step. Joseph had helped this man, and now he leaned on him.

So Joseph, in his day, finds the waiting time in prison a testing time for faith. He, too, seeks deliverance by human help. He had befriended the king's butler, so he concludes that the butler will speak to Pharaoh and get him released. "Only remember me," says Joseph, "when it is well with you..." Joseph must not only learn that the help of man is vain, but that God is his only resource. "God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble." But to receive this "help" we must learn to "be still" and know that God is God (Ps. 46:1, 10). God has His time as well as His way to bring His purposes to pass.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Another writer weighs it gently:

This was natural. Joseph had befriended the king's butler, and such a man could befriend him in return. No one can condemn his longing for that man's sympathy on natural, human, or even moral grounds. But we may still ask whether it was quite worthy of Joseph, and whether faith would have chosen this way.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Why the answer was delayed

The cupbearer walked free and forgot him. Two more years passed. One writer explains why full deliverance is so often delayed.

In every trial, however dark, there are gleams of light and relief. But full deliverance is often delayed by our own anxiety to get it. God is to be the satisfaction of His servant, not the deliverance. So the deliverance is often put off until we have no prospect of it and no expectation of it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A prayer that failed, and one that did not

The same words — "remember me" — appear again at the cross, and the outcome could not be more different.

Joseph prayed to be remembered when the chief butler was raised up again, and the butler forgot him. For that moment he put his confidence in man, and that confidence failed him. The dying criminal, on the other hand, prayed in his distress, but in faith: "Lord, remember me when You come into Your kingdom." He got an immediate answer: "Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise." His confidence was also in a Man. But that Man was the Messiah, David's Son and David's Lord, and so he was not put to shame... it is vain to seek to anticipate, as Joseph was tempted to do, the Lord's deliverance by any human means.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The same plea from Christ

One writer hears Christ making the same request of those He has blessed.

Joseph tells the chief butler the good news of his release, and then says, "Only remember me, when it is well with you." And has not our Joseph said to us about the Lord's Supper, "Do this in remembrance of me"? It was one of His last requests. Shame on us, then, if we hear and believe the good news of our salvation and then forget Him, just as the chief butler forgot Joseph... Thank God, "it is well" with the believer — blessedly, gloriously well — for time and all eternity.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Joseph asked for more than a kind thought. He asked the cupbearer to name him to Pharaoh.

Christ has been cast out by the world, and He expects His friends will make mention of Him. I like to make mention of my best Friend.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Remember me — the request. Joseph asked only the man who had a future. He wanted release from an unjust sentence, not royal favours.

- Remember me — the risk. Commentators differ. One finds nothing selfish or random in the plea. Others see faith leaning on human help, when God alone was Joseph's resource.

- Remember me — the silence. The cupbearer forgot, and two years passed. Deliverance often waits until we stop expecting it, because God means to be the satisfaction of His servant, not only his rescuer.

- Remember me — answered. The same prayer offered to a Man on a cross got an immediate reply, because that Man was David's Son and David's Lord.

- Remember me — reversed. The words now come from Christ to us: remember Him at His table, and make mention of Him to a world that cast Him out.

Genesis 40:15 · Darby

for indeed I was stolen out of the land of the Hebrews, and here also have I done nothing that they should put me into the dungeon.

Joseph had been carried off from his home and then thrown into an Egyptian prison. Now he speaks to a fellow prisoner who is about to walk free, and two short claims carry the whole verse: he was taken by force, and no crime of his put him in that pit.

The land he was taken from

Joseph names his homeland by the people who lived there as strangers. The word itself carries that sense of a man passing through:

The root of the word is "to pass over," as when one passes over a river, or from one region to another. Abraham was told to leave his country and his relatives and go into the land of Canaan. The word Hebrew is not used until Abraham had left his country and was in the land of Canaan. When he was there he was a "sojourner," in a strange country, living in tents. Joseph, when in Egypt, said he had been stolen from "the land of the Hebrews."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

One writer notes how natural that name sounds coming from Joseph, and how familiar it would be to his hearers:

Genesis 40:15 is most natural on the lips of Joseph, looking back on the land where he and his father were once together. He describes it by "the Hebrews" — a name familiar among the Gentiles.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Joseph calls the place a pit, and the word had an everyday sense: "A pit used for water, but sometimes dry and used as a prison" (Morrish Bible Dictionary).

The innocence he claims

Joseph does not argue his case. He states a fact, and his fellow prisoners could judge it for themselves:

So in Joseph in prison we see the suffering Christ. And we see two others suffering with him — Pharaoh's two officers, his chief cupbearer and his chief baker. But they do not suffer like Joseph. He suffered though he was innocent. They, in all probability, were receiving the "due reward of their deeds," like the two thieves crucified with Christ. Joseph was ruler in the dungeon, and the conscience of his fellow prisoners must have said, "This man has done nothing wrong."

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Asking a man to remember him

Commentators differ on whether Joseph's appeal showed prudence or a lack of faith. One reads it as leaning on human help:

Thus Joseph, in his day, finds the waiting time in prison a testing time for faith. He, too, seeks deliverance by an arm of flesh. He had befriended the king's cupbearer, so he concludes the cupbearer will step in with Pharaoh to get him out... Joseph must not only learn that the help of man is vain, but that God is his only resource. "God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble." But to receive this "help" we must learn to "be still" and know that God is God.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Another reads the same request as good sense, and points past it to the One who did not forget:

With the remarkable prudence which marks his character, he had begged not to be forgotten. But he was left in irons a little longer. The word of the LORD tested him. God would work in His own way. If the chief cupbearer forgot Joseph in his prosperity, God did not.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the plea seemed to fail

The cupbearer walked out and said nothing. Yet the silence served a purpose:

Yet the chief cupbearer forgot about Joseph once he was prosperous again. He has become a standing monument of human ingratitude. Still, as we believe, the hand of God was over even this. If the cupbearer had remembered, Joseph's release would have come through a grateful, and perhaps respectful, human arrangement. God intended to take him out, reviving the cupbearer's memory, in a far more striking way. And not only take him out but also lift him above the chief of cupbearers and bakers.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A greater Prisoner

Joseph's two claims — kidnapped, and guilty of nothing — point beyond himself:

It was true enough that there was no cause in Joseph for his being treated so, but how much more this is true of the Lord Jesus, who was totally sinless in every way, yet subjected to far worse treatment than Joseph was given.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The request itself has an echo in the Gospels:

He says to the cupbearer... When it is well with you, think of me. That is like a very touching word of the Lord's. Just before He went into death, He said, "Do this in remembrance of me." The world has cast Christ out, and He expects His friends will make mention of Him. I like to make mention of my best Friend.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Stolen. Joseph names himself a man taken from "the land of the Hebrews." His family lived there as strangers passing through.

- Innocent. He claims no crime. His fellow prisoners, who were getting what their deeds deserved, could only agree: "This man has done nothing wrong." In him we see the suffering Christ.

- Forgotten. He asked a man to remember him, and that man forgot. Commentators differ on whether the request was prudence or leaning on human help.

- Remembered. The cupbearer's memory failed, but God's did not — and the delay meant release came by God's hand, not by human favour.

- Fulfilled. Joseph asked the cupbearer to think of him. Christ, cast out by the world, asks His friends to make mention of Him.

Genesis 40:16 · Darby

And when the chief of the bakers saw that the interpretation was good, he said to Joseph, I also was in my dream, and behold, three baskets of white bread were on my head.

The chief baker spoke up only after Joseph read the cupbearer's dream and the news was good. His timing, and the load he carried on his head, are what commentators dig into here.

Why He Spoke Only Then

The verse turns on what the baker saw before he spoke. Older translations call the cupbearer "the butler." One writer finds the two prisoners alike in everything but this:

The two men may look no different in position or actions. But there is still a marked difference in how they receive Joseph's approach. The butler opens his heart to him at once. But of the other one we read, "When the chief baker saw…" He held back until an outside circumstance encouraged him. He "saw" — he walked by sight.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The baker's dream ran the other way, and its count of three set the timing:

Encouraged by this favourable interpretation, the baker told his dream. Its main points were: (1) there were three baskets of baked goods; (2) the baskets sat on his head; and (3) birds ate the food, so it never reached Pharaoh. Again the interpretation was simple. Within three days Pharaoh would lift up his head, hanging him on a tree, so that the birds would eat his flesh. His dream meant exactly the opposite of the butler's.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Two Dreams, Two Religions

Set the two dreams side by side. One man handled fruit he had not grown. The other carried food he had baked himself.

We see the gospel pictured in these dreams. The chief butler sees in his dream what speaks of the blood — the juice of the grape. And he was delivered. The chief baker dreams of what at once reminds us of human righteousness, the white baskets. He saw only what he had worked to produce, the baked goods. And he is hanged. The chief butler sees something ready to his hand, the grape clusters. He takes them and presents them to Pharaoh as the blood of the grape. The birds of the air eat the baker's offering. Here we have "the only two religions" pictured. One makes everything depend on the blood of Jesus. The other ignores the blood and trusts human righteousness.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

(Knapp follows an older translation, "white baskets." The ESV has "three cake baskets on my head.")

Food That Never Reached the King

Two things marked the baker's basket. He had made what it held, and he had made it for the king's table.

The bakery goods were the work of the baker's hands. They were meant for Pharaoh, just as people mean to please God by their good works. They do not realise that these things can never take away the sins they have committed. God certainly cannot accept our works in place of what His own Son did. He bore the agony of terrible judgment at Calvary. People think God will accept their works as payment for their sins. But the baked goods never reached Pharaoh's table: the birds ate them. The birds of the air picture the work of evil spirits. They love to deceive people by flattering their so-called good works (Matthew 13:4 and 19). Satan gains from this, not God.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The same writer weighs the top basket, the best the baker had to offer:

Baked goods are not enough. People may pile them up, decorated and fragrant, as high as heaven. Still the evil spirits will waste them, and the baskets are full of holes. The baking of human religion is like Cain's sacrifice — his own design and labour, lifeless and bloodless. The top basket was full of them — the very height of spirituality. They were "prepared for Pharaoh" too. But Pharaoh would have none of them.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Joseph's Discerning Ear

Nothing in his own dream alarmed the baker. The difference lay in the listener, and in where that listener looked.

It is clear how far the chief baker was from seeing anything to discourage him from telling his dream to Joseph. But God gave Joseph the discerning ear. In one dream the cupbearer handed Pharaoh a drink. In the other the birds — not the king — ate out of the basket on the baker's head. Joseph saw the immense difference. Mere natural intelligence gets no credit at all. The secret of the Lord is with those who fear Him. Joseph's faith was in constant use. He knew that God stays the same in the middle of heavy trials, and his own trials had only grown from one great sorrow into a greater one. At his lowest point he looked up for wisdom to its only source.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sight — The baker spoke only after he "saw" another man get good news. His hope rested on a circumstance, not on God.

- Self — He carried his own product: baskets of his own baking. Commentators read this as human righteousness offered to God.

- Short — He prepared the food for the king, and the king never tasted it. Works offered to pay for sin never arrive.

- Stolen — Birds ate what he had made. Commentators see in them evil spirits, who flatter people about their good works.

- Secret — Only Joseph heard what the dream truly said. Interpretations belong to God, not to natural cleverness.

Genesis 40:17 · Darby

And in the uppermost basket there were all manner of victuals for Pharaoh that the baker makes, and the birds ate them out of the basket upon my head.

The baker had just heard Joseph give the cupbearer good news, so he told his own dream in hope. Commentators read the two dreams as a picture of two ways of coming to God: one man carries food he made himself, the other hands the king a cup.

Why the baker spoke

He told his dream only after seeing how the first interpretation turned out. One writer sees that hesitation as the real difference between the two men:

The two men may look no different in position or in what they did. Yet there is a marked difference in how they receive Joseph's approach. The cupbearer gladly opens his heart to him. But of the other one we read, "When the chief baker saw…" He held back until some outward circumstance encouraged him: he "saw" — he walked by sight.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Food the baker made himself

The cupbearer's dream ended with a cup placed in the king's hand. The baker's dream was full of food he had made himself:

Let us look at the chief baker now. He saw in his dream, as we have said, what stands for human righteousness — white baskets and baked goods prepared by his own skilful hand. And oh, what baskets of good things, as they suppose, are self-righteous sinners all around preparing for God's acceptance!

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Prepared for Pharaoh, never tasted by him

The basket was the top one, and the food was for Pharaoh. Neither fact saved it:

Baked goods are not enough. Men may pile them up, ornate and fragrant, as high as heaven. The evil spirits will still waste them, and the baskets are full of holes. The pastry of human religion is like Cain's sacrifice — his own design and work, lifeless and bloodless. There was the uppermost basket full of them — the very height of spirituality — and "prepared for Pharaoh" too. But Pharaoh would have none of them.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The birds

Scripture uses birds elsewhere as a settled image, and this verse is one of the places it is drawn from:

These are used as symbols of evil agents: for example, in the dream of Pharaoh's baker, the birds ate the baked food he was carrying on his head, Gen. 40:17; and in the parable of the Sower the birds that devoured the seed by the path are interpreted by Christ to mean "the evil one." Matt. 13:4, 19.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

If the king never ate the food, who did?

God cannot accept men's works as a substitute for the work of His own Son, who bore the agony of terrible judgment at Calvary. The baked goods were meant for Pharaoh. In the same way, men think God will accept their works as payment for their sins. But the food never reached Pharaoh's table: the birds ate it. The birds of the air picture the satanic activity of evil spirits. They love to deceive people by flattering their so-called good works (Matt. 13:4 and 19). It is Satan who gains from this, not God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

How Joseph could tell the two apart

Nothing in his own dream sounded alarming to the baker. The difference lay in one detail — who ate what he carried:

It is clear that the chief baker saw nothing to discourage him from telling his dream to Joseph. But God gave Joseph the discerning ear to perceive the immense difference between the two. The cupbearer acted so that Pharaoh should drink. The birds — not the king — ate out of the basket on his head. In no way is the credit given to mere natural intelligence.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The man and his baskets

The same number appeared in both dreams, and the same three days brought opposite outcomes:

There were "three days" in each case: death and resurrection delivers one and condemns the other.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Carried — the baker carries his baskets on his own head. Everything in the dream is his own work, and he holds it up himself.

- Offered — the food really is "for Pharaoh," and real effort went into it. Intention and quality were never the problem.

- Intercepted — the birds eat what was meant for the king. Birds picture evil spirits, so the offering feeds the deceiver instead.

- Rejected — Pharaoh refuses even the uppermost basket, the highest reach of it. No one can hand his own work to God as payment.

- Divided — the same three days restore one man and condemn the other. Only Joseph, given discernment by God, could hear which was which.

Genesis 40:18 · Darby

And Joseph answered and said, This is the interpretation of it the three baskets are three days.

Joseph is a prisoner reading a prisoner's dream. This time the message he must deliver is a death sentence. The baker's three baskets match the three branches in the butler's dream, yet the outcome is the opposite.

The meaning came from God, not from skill

The king's cupbearer (the butler) and his baker both dreamed on the same night. Both dreams turned on the number three. The difference Joseph caught was not in the number but in what happened to the goods. Commentators say he did not work it out. God gave it:

God gave Joseph the discerning ear that saw the immense difference between the two dreams. The cup-bearer acted so that Pharaoh should drink. But it was the birds — not the king — who ate out of the basket on the baker's head. In no way is the credit given to mere natural intelligence. The secret of the Lord is with those who fear Him. Joseph's faith was always in exercise. He knew that God remains the same in the middle of heavy trials. In his lowest humiliation he looked up for wisdom to its only source. God's power then called him to solve the riddle, for good or for ill, in the cases brought before him. And if he trusted the Lord, his love also went out in compassion to fellow-sufferers. Their faces, without a word, showed the worry their dreams cost them. Was it not faith working by love?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Three baskets, three days — and the opposite verdict

The baker spoke up because the first interpretation had been good news. What came back used the same three parts — and ended in death:

Encouraged by this favourable interpretation, the baker told his dream. Its main points were these. The baskets of baked goods were three. The baskets were on his head. Birds ate the baked goods, and they never reached Pharaoh. Again the interpretation was simple. Within three days Pharaoh would lift up his head, hanging him on a tree, so that the birds would eat his flesh. His dream had exactly the opposite meaning to that of the butler.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Joseph did not soften the verdict. One writer says he told the baker straight out that hanging was his fate (C. Knapp).

Two men alike, two destinies

Nothing visible separated these two prisoners. The division came from outside them, through the word spoken over them:

Here were two men in the same place of bondage, equally condemned, and, as far as we know, equally guilty — or innocent — just alike in all outward appearance. Christ, pictured in Joseph, comes among them and pronounces one saved and the other lost.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Baskets of a man's own work

Commentators read the two dreams as a picture of two religions. One man saw grapes he had not grown. The other saw goods he had baked himself:

We see the gospel pictured in these dreams. The chief butler sees in his dream what speaks of the blood — the juice of the grape. And he was delivered. The chief baker, on the other hand, dreams of what reminds us at once of human righteousness, the white baskets. He saw only what he had laboured to produce, the baked goods. And he is hanged... Here we have the only two religions pictured. One makes everything depend on the blood of Jesus. The other ignores the blood and trusts human righteousness.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

The baskets were not poor work. They were the best the man could make, stacked high and meant for the king:

Baked goods are not enough. Men may pile them up, ornate and fragrant, as high as heaven. The evil spirits will still waste them, and the baskets are full of holes. The baking of human religion is like Cain's sacrifice — his own design and labour, lifeless and bloodless. There was the top basket full of them, the very height of spirituality, and "prepared for Pharaoh" too. But Pharaoh would have none of them.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The prison scene as a picture of the present time

One writer traces the whole pattern behind the prison scene — a son rejected by his own, sold, and then raised:

His own people, Israel, had rejected the Son of the Father and sold Him for a few pieces of silver. He was put to death "in a figure." He had risen from the dead and passed over to the Gentiles, to become the Saviour of the world and the Revealer of secrets... He is found among the captive and afflicted. His presence and words must separate them into two classes, saved and lost. The butler and baker are divided like the repentant and unrepentant thieves at the crucifixion... The millennial time is still future: the prison scene is going on now.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Given, not guessed. Joseph did not reason the meaning out. God gave the discerning ear to a man whose faith was always in exercise.

- Given plainly. The baker's dream matched his neighbour's in shape but not in outcome. Joseph told him the truth without softening it.

- Given to both. Two condemned prisoners looked alike. The word spoken over them, not anything in them, pronounced one saved and one lost.

- Given, not earned. The butler offered what he had not produced. The baker offered his own labour, piled high for the king. Pharaoh would have none of it.

- Given still. Commentators read the prison as a picture of the present age. The rejected One is among the captives now, and His word still divides them.

Genesis 40:19 · Darby

In yet three days will Pharaoh lift up thy head from off thee, and hang thee on a tree; and the birds will eat thy flesh from off thee.

Joseph has just promised the cupbearer freedom in three days, so the baker tells his own dream expecting good news too. The reply uses nearly the same words and means the opposite — why do two men in one prison end so differently?

The Same Phrase, Two Destinies

One writer sets out the three parts of the dream and what they meant:

The baker's dream had these key features: the baskets of baked goods were three; the baskets were on his head; and the birds ate the baked goods, which never reached Pharaoh. Again the interpretation was simple. Within three days Pharaoh would lift up his head and hang him on a tree, so that the birds would eat his flesh. His dream had exactly the opposite meaning to the cupbearer's.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The same phrase covered both men, and that is where the paths split:

On the third day, his birthday, the king lifted up the head of each official. But the chief cupbearer rose to his post beside Pharaoh, and the chief baker rose to the gallows.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Joseph Heard

Joseph did not read the dream by being clever:

Clearly the chief baker saw nothing in his dream to discourage him from telling it to Joseph. But God gave Joseph the discerning ear. In the cupbearer's dream Pharaoh drank. In the baker's, the birds — not the king — ate out of the basket on his head. Joseph saw the huge difference. The credit does not go to mere natural intelligence.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Was in the Baskets

One writer takes the three days and the baker's baskets as a picture of two ways of approaching God:

The three days still remind us of the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus. For the believer this is great blessing. For the unbeliever it is just as surely condemnation. But the bakery goods were the work of the baker's hands. The baker meant them for Pharaoh, just as men mean to please God by their good works, not realising that these things can never take away the sins they have committed. God certainly cannot accept men's works in place of the work of His own Son, who bore the agony of terrible judgment on Calvary. The bakery goods never reached Pharaoh's table: the birds ate them. The birds of the air picture the activity of evil spirits, who love to deceive people by flattering their so-called good works. It is Satan who gains from this, not God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer presses the image further. Effort and display were never the problem:

Baked goods are not enough. Even if men pile them up, decorated and fragrant, as high as heaven, the evil spirits will waste them. The baskets are full of holes. The fancy baking of human religion is like Cain's sacrifice — his own design and his own labour, lifeless and bloodless.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Tree and the Curse

The sentence has a grim symmetry: the birds that robbed his offering ended up feeding on him. One writer draws out what hanging on a tree came to mean in Scripture:

Pharaoh hanged the baker, and the very birds that ate his baked goods ate his flesh. ... Awful end! Fearful doom! And, self-righteous sinner, it is a sure forewarning of your own. "Cursed is everyone who is hanged on a tree," Scripture says.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

One writer traces that curse to where it finally landed. Christ "redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us." The baker died that death under judgment. The Saviour chose it (Hamilton Smith).

Two Men, One Prison, Opposite Verdicts

Nothing in the record separates these two men except their dreams:

Here were two men in the same prison, equally condemned, and as far as we know equally guilty — or innocent. They were just alike in every outward way. Christ (Joseph) comes among them and pronounces one saved and the other lost.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Same words. Pharaoh "lifted up the head" of both men on the same day — one to his old office, one to the gallows. Identical treatment, opposite ends.

- Different contents. The cupbearer's dream ended with Pharaoh drinking. The baker's put his own handiwork on his own head, and it never reached the king.

- Different reader. Joseph did not guess. He noticed that the birds, not Pharaoh, ate. God gave him that discernment; natural intelligence did not.

- Different end. Hanging on a tree carries the curse in Scripture. The birds that stole the offering — a picture of evil spirits — fed on the man.

- Same Saviour. The curse that fell on the baker as judgment fell on Christ by His own choice. He became a curse to redeem those who trust Him.

Genesis 40:20 · Darby

And it came to pass the third day -- Pharaoh's birthday -- that he made a feast to all his bondmen. And he lifted up the head of the chief of the cup-bearers, and the head of the chief of the bakers among his bondmen.

The third day came, just as Joseph had said. Pharaoh kept his birthday with a feast, and he brought two prisoners up from the dungeon in front of his whole court. The same royal act touches both men, yet it sends one back to the king's side and the other to the gallows.

The occasion

Kept birthdays are rare in Scripture, and Pharaoh's is the first one named.

Scripture mentions only two kept birthdays. One is Pharaoh's, in Genesis 40:20. The other is Herod Antipas's, when John the Baptist lost his life (Matthew 14:6; Mark 6:21). Some think that Job's sons, who feasted "each on his day," did so on their birthdays, Job 1:4, 13. We do not read that the Israelites had any such custom. And the Preacher says the day of death is better than the day of one's birth (Ecclesiastes 7:1).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

One phrase, two outcomes

Pharaoh "lifted up the head" of both officials — the same wording covers a restoration and an execution.

In both cases the time was short, as the dream indicated and Joseph interpreted. On the third day, his birthday, the king lifted up the head of each official. But the chief cup-bearer rose to his post beside Pharaoh, and the chief baker rose to the gallows.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A prisoner's word proved true

The text never explains why the king decided as he did.

The third day arrived, and Joseph's interpretation of the dreams proved true. Being Pharaoh's birthday, he made a feast for his servants. Both the cupbearer and the baker were brought out into public view, but for opposite reasons (v. 20). The chief cupbearer was restored to his former position, while the baker was hanged (vv. 21-22). What influenced Pharaoh here is not mentioned. But the evidence of God's presence with Joseph was unmistakable.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Two men, one dividing line

Writers have read the two prisoners as a picture of Christ dividing people. Nothing visible marked one man out from the other.

Here were two men in the same prison, both equally condemned. As far as we know, they were equally guilty — or equally innocent. They looked exactly alike in every outward way. Christ (Joseph) comes among them and pronounces one saved and the other lost.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What separated them

The difference lay in what each man's dream had put before him.

We see the gospel pictured in these dreams. The chief butler sees in his dream what speaks of the blood (the juice of the grape). And he was delivered. The chief baker, on the other hand, dreams of the white baskets. They remind us at once of human righteousness. He saw only what he had laboured to produce, the baked goods. And he is hanged... Here we have "the only two religions" pictured. One makes everything depend on the blood of Jesus. The other ignores the blood and trusts human righteousness.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

The man nobody remembered

The restored cupbearer went back to palace life and left his interpreter in the dungeon. One writer sees God's hand even behind that failure.

The event proved that Joseph's interpretations were given by God. Pharaoh's birthday was on the third day, and he acted as the dreams had indicated. Yet the chief butler, in his renewed prosperity, forgot about Joseph. He has become a standing monument of human ingratitude. Still, we believe the hand of God was over even this. If the butler had remembered, Joseph's release would have come through grateful, and perhaps respectful, human arrangement. God intended to take him out, by reviving the butler's memory, in a far more striking way.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The application

Grant turns that forgetting into a warning for believers.

May the Lord preserve us from being like him. We who are believers have far more reason to remember the Lord Jesus than the cupbearer had to remember Joseph. He has not only foretold our deliverance. He has Himself delivered us from all our sins and our bondage, through the great sacrifice of Himself. Believers may too easily let this become almost forgotten in practice. That is a real reason why the Lord gave us the Lord's supper with the words, "Do this in remembrance of Me" (Luke 22:19).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Word — Joseph's interpretation came true on the exact day. Nothing is said about Pharaoh's motives, so the one clear cause is that God was with Joseph.

- Feast — Scripture names only two kept birthdays, Pharaoh's and Herod's. At both, a man loses his life.

- Lifted — the same royal phrase covered both men: one head raised to the king's cup, one raised to the gallows.

- Divided — the two prisoners looked alike in every outward way. One dream pointed to the blood, the other to human effort; one man lived, one died.

- Remembered — the freed cupbearer forgot Joseph. Believers have far more reason to remember: "Do this in remembrance of Me."

Genesis 40:21 · Darby

And he restored the chief of the cup-bearers to his office of cup-bearer again; and he gave the cup into Pharaoh's hand.

On the third day the chief cupbearer leaves prison and stands at Pharaoh's side again, cup in hand, just as Joseph had said. One verse hands a man his life back, and proves that the forgotten prisoner in the dungeon spoke for God.

"Lifted up his head"

Joseph had told the cupbearer that Pharaoh would "lift up his head." Here is what that phrase meant.

Joseph, in communion with the mind of God, had no difficulty in interpreting this dream. "The three branches are three days," he says (v. 12). Within three days Pharaoh would "lift up his head" — that is, bring him into public view and restore him to his office of cupbearer.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The word proved true

The third day settled everything.

Joseph's interpretation of the dreams proved true when the third day arrived. It was Pharaoh's birthday, and he made a feast for his servants. Both the cupbearer and the baker came out into public view, but for opposite reasons (v. 20). Pharaoh restored the chief cupbearer to his former post and hanged the baker (vv. 21-22). Scripture does not say what influenced Pharaoh in these matters, but the evidence of God's presence with Joseph was unmistakable.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Joseph had not guessed. Commentators note how exact the timing was — three branches meaning three days, not three months:

No temple interpreter in Egypt would have dared to say, as Joseph did at once, "The three branches are three days. Within yet three days will Pharaoh lift up your head, and restore you to your office." If he had been guessing, three months would have seemed more likely; but no. The secret of the LORD is with those who fear Him... Interpretation of what God says or does belongs to God. He gives it as He wills, and as a rule to those He loves, even in the deepest humiliation.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two men, two destinies

This verse carries its full weight only beside the next one. Two prisoners went in together. One came out to the palace, the other to the gallows.

Here were two men in the same place of bondage, equally condemned, and, so far as we know, equally guilty — or innocent — just alike in all outward appearance. Christ (Joseph) comes among them and pronounces one saved and the other lost.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Writers have long compared the two prisoners to the two thieves crucified beside Jesus.

So in Joseph in prison we see the suffering Christ. And we see two others suffering with him — Pharaoh's two officers, his chief butler and his chief baker. But they do not suffer like Joseph. He suffered though innocent. They, in all probability, were receiving the "due reward of their deeds," like the two thieves crucified with Christ.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The cup in the king's hand

The cupbearer's dream had a vine and a cup. Commentators read both as pictures.

The butler is brought before a vine, with three branches, living and fruitful. Pharaoh's cup (the symbol of God's judgment, Psalm 75:7-8) is in his hand; he takes the grapes and presses them into the cup, and then gives the cup into Pharaoh's hands. That is, the man takes his place in the presence of Christ, the true Vine. He accepts God's judgment and offers the blood of Christ, in the measure of that judgment. God accepts the offering, and the man is forgiven and exalted... There were "three days" in each case: death and resurrection delivers one and condemns the other.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The baker's dream held baskets of bread he had baked himself. Commentators read the contrast as two ways of coming to God.

We see the gospel pictured in these dreams. The chief butler sees that in his dream which speaks of the blood (the juice of the grape). And he was delivered. The chief baker, on the other hand, dreams of that which at once reminds us of human righteousness, the white baskets. He saw only what he had worked to produce, the baked goods. And he is hanged... Here we have "the only two religions" pictured — the one that makes everything depend on the blood of Jesus, and the one that ignores the blood and trusts human righteousness.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Restored — and forgetful

The man who got his job back never mentioned Joseph. Yet writers see God's hand even in that silence.

Yet the chief butler in his renewed prosperity forgot about Joseph, and has become a standing monument of human ingratitude. Still, as we believe, the hand of God was over even this. Had the butler remembered, Joseph's deliverance from prison would have been the result of thankful and perhaps respectful human arrangement. God intended to take him out, reviving the butler's memory, in a far more striking way. And not only take him out but also exalt him above the chief of butlers and bakers.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Word — Joseph said the three branches meant three days. On day three the cupbearer stood in public view with the cup back in his hand.

- Witness — Scripture gives no reason for Pharaoh's decision. The exact fulfilment showed that God was with Joseph.

- Divide — two prisoners looked alike and stood under the same sentence. Joseph pronounced one saved and one lost, like the two men crucified beside Jesus.

- Cup — one man offered the blood of the grape in the cup of judgment, and God forgave him and raised him up. The other offered what his own hands had baked, and Pharaoh hanged him.

- Delay — the restored man forgot Joseph. God used that forgetting to bring Joseph out later in a far more striking way.

Genesis 40:22 · Darby

And he hanged the chief of the bakers, as Joseph had interpreted to them.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Genesis 40:23 · Darby

But the chief of the cup-bearers did not remember Joseph, and forgot him.

Joseph had read God's meaning in two prisoners' dreams. He asked one thing in return: that the restored cupbearer would mention him to Pharaoh. The chapter ends on a blank. The man walks back into royal favour and lets his rescuer slip from mind. Why did God let a good man's one hope fail?

The ingratitude of the cupbearer

Joseph had given this man something no prisoner could be expected to give, and got nothing back for it.

Here as ever, man's extremity is God's opportunity. The chief cupbearer forgot Joseph's service. It was rare, well-timed, and unpaid. No money could have bought it, and God alone could have enabled that prisoner — his name blackened, though he was blameless — to give it. Both predictions came surely true: his own restoration to honour, and his companion's fatal fall. Was it not inexcusable that this stirred no quick gratitude in him, let alone any burning sense of justice, for the suffering prophet?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Looking to human help

Some writers read Joseph's plea as a lapse of faith. Prison was testing whether he would look to God alone.

So Joseph, in his day, finds the waiting time in prison a testing time for faith. He too looks for deliverance through human help. He had befriended the king's cupbearer, so he naturally concludes the cupbearer will speak to Pharaoh and get him released... Joseph must learn not only that the help of man is useless, but that God is his only resource.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Commentators differ. Others see no fault in the plea, and read the silence that followed as God's way of working.

With the remarkable prudence that marks his character, he had begged not to be forgotten. But he stayed in irons a little longer. The word of the LORD tested him. God would work in His own way. If the chief cupbearer forgot Joseph in his prosperity, God did not.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the forgetting served God's plan

A kept promise would have brought Joseph a smaller rescue than a broken one.

In his renewed prosperity the chief cupbearer forgot about Joseph. He has become a standing monument of human ingratitude. Still, as we believe, the hand of God was over even this. If the cupbearer had remembered, a thankful and perhaps respectful human arrangement would have freed him from prison. God intended to bring him out by reviving the cupbearer's memory, in a far more striking way. And not only to bring him out, but to lift him above the chief of cupbearers and bakers.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Mercy renewed every day

The waiting dragged on. One kindness never lapsed.

Meanwhile, if man forgets to show Joseph kindness, God will not forget to show him mercy... The devil may tempt us day by day. God may test us by keeping us waiting from day to day. Still He renews His mercy every day...

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Two men who asked to be remembered

Set Joseph's plea beside the dying criminal at the cross, and the difference lies in who was asked.

Joseph prayed to be remembered when the chief cupbearer rose again to honour, but the man forgot him. He put his confidence, for the moment, in man, and he was disappointed. The dying criminal, on the other hand, prayed in his distress, but in faith: "Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom;" and he received the immediate answer, "Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise." His confidence was also in a Man. But that Man was the Messiah, David's Son and also David's Lord, and so he was not put to shame... First, it is useless to try to get ahead of the Lord's deliverance by human means, as Joseph was tempted to do. Second, it is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in princes; and last, "those who wait for me shall not be put to shame" (Isaiah 49:23).

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The request Christ makes of His own

Christ left His own a request that echoes Joseph's plea to the cupbearer.

After telling the chief cupbearer the good news of his deliverance, Joseph says, "Only remember me, when it is well with you." And has not our Joseph said to us about the Lord's Supper, "Do this in remembrance of me"? It was one of His last requests. Shame on us, then, if we hear and believe the good news of our salvation and then forget Him, like the chief cupbearer... And if any have, may you be moved to say, like the ungrateful cupbearer after years of ignoring Joseph's plea, "I remember my offenses today."

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Forgotten by man. The cupbearer got a service no money could buy, and repaid it with silence. He stands as a monument of human ingratitude.

- Remembered by God. Prosperity wiped Joseph from the cupbearer's memory. It could not wipe him from God's. The Lord remembered him, with fresh mercy every day.

- Delayed by design. If the cupbearer had remembered, Joseph would have owed his release to a human favour. God meant to bring him out in a far more striking way, and lift him above every cupbearer.

- Tested, not abandoned. Writers differ on whether the plea was prudence or a lean on human help. They agree the waiting was a test: the word of the LORD tested him.

- Remembering Christ. Joseph asked, "Only remember me, when it is well with you." Christ asks, "Do this in remembrance of me" — the one thing our Deliverer left us not to forget.