Genesis 38:6–30

Genesis 38:6 · Darby

And Judah took a wife for Er his firstborn, and her name was Tamar.

Genesis 38 breaks off the story of Joseph to follow Judah, who has settled among the Canaanites. Verse 6 looks like a small family detail: a father chooses a wife for his eldest son. It opens a chapter of failure, and out of that failure God draws the family line of the Messiah.

A wife chosen in the wrong place

Judah chose the bride himself. One writer sets that choice beside how Abraham, Isaac and Jacob handled marriage with the Canaanites.

It would seem that Tamar, the daughter-in-law of Judah, was a daughter of the Canaanites, like her mother-in-law. Abraham had been most careful about the choice of a wife for Isaac; she was not to be a daughter of the Canaanites. But Isaac plainly did not step in when Esau took wives from the daughters of the Hittites, though they caused him grief. Isaac charged Jacob not to take a wife from the daughters of Canaan. Yet Jacob does not seem to have been troubled when Judah joined himself to the Canaanites through Shuah, or when he took Tamar to be the wife of his eldest son, Er. There is much instruction for Christians in all this: how very careful we should be about our associations, both for ourselves and for our children.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Er, the firstborn son

The verse names Er as the firstborn. What he became had much to do with the father who raised him.

Er was the firstborn of Judah's strength. His father named him, and his name may mean "watchful." Er, it seems, became watchful for chances to do evil… Er deceived himself. But was he not simply following his father? To bring up children in an evil world is not easy. When parents introduce their children to the things of this present evil age, they will find them throwing themselves into it with great energy. And that world lies in ruin, far from God.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

What Tamar gained by this marriage

Marriage to the firstborn put Tamar in line to carry on Judah's family. Judah later took that right from her.

Tamar had the right to be the mother of Judah's heir. He kept that right from her, and in doing so blamed her for the death of his sons. He did not blame his own sons for any wrong. Judah's favouritism toward his own family blinded him to the truth… Many people today let family ties sway their judgment in important matters.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

The chapter as a measure of Judah

Why is this chapter placed here at all? One writer sees a deliberate contrast: two men, the same temptation.

Genesis 38 completely interrupts the story of Joseph. It would seem that the shameful story of Judah is told here to heighten in our minds the way Joseph stood firm under a temptation of the same kind. Judah appears to have been among the better behaved of Jacob's sons. Yet the practices that marked him and his family were evil, and it seems they were accepted as nothing very unusual.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

This is the same Judah who had sold Joseph. Yet God's line to the Messiah ran straight through his house.

It was Judah, not Reuben or any other of the tribal heads, who proposed the sale of Joseph. Now he showed in his own house the evil that drew down curse on curse. In the end he had to admit the sad shame of Tamar — more righteous than himself, though he had sentenced her to die by fire. Yet by this guilty Judah, and by Tamar, came He who cleanses from all sin by His blood, and will reign over the universe to God's glory.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Her name in Christ's family line

Matthew's record of Christ's ancestry names four women, and Tamar comes first. Each of the four carries a different note, and Tamar's note is not her goodness.

With Tamar it is her sin that stands out, as with Rahab it is her faith. For Ruth to come in, the sentence of the law has to be set aside. And Bathsheba shows us grace winning even over a believer's sin. A salvation for sinners. A salvation by faith. A salvation from the sentence of the law. An eternal salvation. This is what the simple placing of these names declares… Tamar's sin alone brought her into the Lord's genealogy, and God has taken pains to record, doubly record, this striking fact. In the same way, simply as sinners, we have the right to rejoice in a work done for the need of sinners.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Choice. Judah picked Tamar for Er, forgetting the care Abraham took over Isaac's marriage. The warning is for our own friendships and our children's.

- Consequence. The son named "watchful" grew watchful for evil, and writers trace that back to the father who raised him in it.

- Claim. The marriage gave Tamar a real right: to be the mother of Judah's heir. Judah's favouritism toward his own sons later took it from her.

- Contrast. The chapter interrupts Joseph's story on purpose. Two men met a similar temptation, and only Joseph stood.

- Conclusion. Through this guilty Judah and this Tamar came the One who cleanses from all sin. Her sin, not her goodness, put her name in Christ's family line — and that is the sinner's own right to rejoice.

Genesis 38:7 · Darby

And Er, Judah's firstborn, was wicked in the sight of Jehovah, and Jehovah slew him.

Genesis 38 breaks off the story of Joseph to show what was happening in Judah's own home, and verse 7 is the first blow to fall there. Judah's eldest son dies by a direct act of God — and this is the family line that would give Israel her kings.

The Family Judah Built

Er's life begins with his father's choice of a wife from Canaan. One writer sets Judah beside Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and finds him the worst of the four:

Judah does not guard his household against evil beforehand, as Abraham did. He does not grieve over evil once it has come in, as Isaac did. He is not even careless about it, whether it comes in or not, like Jacob. He brings it in himself! He does nothing less than take a daughter of the Canaanites to be the wife of his son Er!

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Er's death is one item in a longer list. Another writer sets out Judah's whole record:

He sold his brother, he deceived his father, he married a Canaanite wife, he had both his sons killed by the Lord for wickedness, he deceived his daughter-in-law when promising his son Shelah to her, then had two sons by the same daughter-in-law (unwittingly).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why "the LORD" Is Named Here

The name for God in this verse matters. Older translations print it as "Jehovah"; the ESV renders it "the LORD." One writer notes how rarely it appears in the rest of Genesis:

The only places where we find "Jehovah" in the rest of the book are in Judah's case, chapter 38:7-10, where you can see that these are His special ways and His government; and with Joseph sold and in trial, chapter 39.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same name marks two opposite outcomes in two neighbouring chapters:

The name "Jehovah," not just "God," stands out in both chapters. In Genesis 38 He judges the open breaking of His will. In Genesis 39 He makes the man prosper who sought to please Him, and that in the hardest circumstances — first as a slave, then as a prisoner.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Sin Scripture Does Not Name

Scripture never tells us what Er did. It tells us who saw it, and how fast God settled the account:

Er was the firstborn of Judah's strength. His father named him, and the meaning of his name may be "watchful." Er clearly became watchful for chances to do evil. He thought his sins would have no consequences. But the biblical principle in Galatians 6:7 holds good for all time: "God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap." Jehovah saw his wickedness, and he reaped what his actions deserved. Pay-day came fast for him: "and the LORD put him to death."

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

The same writer turns the warning toward the parents:

Er deceived himself. But was he not simply following his father? … When parents introduce their children to the things of this present evil age, they will find them throwing themselves with full energy into the world, in all its ruin and turning away from God.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

What the Sons' Names Mean

The names of Judah's three sons carry meanings, and one writer reads God's dealings in them:

Yet his line still goes on in the earth. God's wrath rests on the first two sons, whose names speak — Er of "enmity," and Onan of "iniquity" — while the third son, Shelah ("sprout"?), speaks of the divine power of resurrection, which brings out of death. So a remnant is preserved.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators differ on what Er's name means: one takes it as "watchful," another as "enmity."

Judgment Falls, the Line Survives

God's judgment here is not the last word over this family. The line He strikes is the line that reaches the King of kings:

Judah was about to become not only the royal tribe above all others, but the ancestor of the King of kings. Yet he takes for himself, without any reverence, a daughter of Canaan. No wonder that wickedness killed his firstborn, and disgraceful sin his brother… Such is man, and such is Judah; but such too is God. Where terrible sin abounded, grace abounded far more.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sown — Judah married into Canaan, and he picked a Canaanite wife for his son. The evil judged in verse 7 grew in soil his father prepared.

- Seen — Scripture never describes Er's sin. It only tells us who saw it: he was wicked "in the sight of the LORD," and what a man sows he reaps.

- Named — Genesis rarely uses the covenant name in these closing chapters. Here it marks Er's death as God's own government at work, not bad luck.

- Spared — God cuts off enmity and iniquity in the two elder sons. He leaves the third, "sprout," alive: a remnant kept out of death.

- Surpassed — God judged this family, and from this family came the King of kings. Where sin abounded, grace abounded far more.

Genesis 38:8 · Darby

Then Judah said to Onan, Go in to thy brother's wife, and fulfil to her the brother-in-law's duty, and raise up seed to thy brother.

Judah tells his second son to marry his dead brother's widow and father a child in the dead brother's name. Two questions follow: what duty was Judah calling on, and why did refusing it displease God so deeply?

The custom behind the command

Judah was not inventing a family arrangement. He was calling on a known custom.

One marked exception was needed to keep up tribal inheritance in Israel. It existed elsewhere, but it applied to no other people as it did to them, and still less to a Christian: a Levirate, or brother-in-law, marriage. It came into force when a man died childless. Then his brother or next of kin was called to raise up offspring for the dead man. The aim was to hold the family line and the inheritance together. If the nearer kinsman refused, the widow had the right to take off his shoe in public and spit in his face.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

More than property was at stake.

The law made a merciful provision (Deut. 25:5-10): no man's family should die out while a brother lived to carry on the line. In Israel, to be childless was a disgrace. If a man's name was blotted out — his family dying out — people saw it as a special mark of God's displeasure... In His provision there seems, too, to be a recognition of that hope in the heart of every Hebrew woman: that through her the promise of "the woman's seed" might somehow be fulfilled. This came true literally in the family line kept alive through Ruth.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

How Judah's house reached this point

Judah is giving orders about a marriage. His own marriage had already broken with what his family stood for.

Judah had no regard for the ancient landmark set up by Abraham, who said, "you shall not take a wife for my son from the daughters of the Canaanites" (Gen. 24:3)... The way he chose his wife is suggested by the phrase "And Judah saw," much the same as Samson in later years... There was no thought of making a choice according to the mind of God.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

What Onan refused

Onan obeyed the letter of his father's command and refused its whole purpose.

Onan married Tamar but then refused to grant her the privilege of being the mother of Judah's heir. He was prepared to marry her and enjoy conjugal relations, but he wanted to hold back his strength. The sin that is so displeasing to God in Onan's case was not simply spilling his seed on the ground, but selfishness. He wanted her to remain a childless and despised widow, and his whole attitude was governed by this. It was not a single sin but a repeated one, for the word "when" in verse 9 should read "whenever."

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Names that carry the story

Judah's line survives this chapter. Some writers find that outcome written into the meaning of his three sons' names.

His seed still continues on the earth, even though God's wrath rests on the first two sons. Their names speak: Er of "enmity," and Onan of "iniquity." The third son, Shelah ("sprout"?), speaks of divine power in resurrection, bringing life out of death. So a remnant is preserved.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Grace running through the wreckage

The line Onan refused to continue went on anyway. The New Testament does not hide where it led.

"It is evident that our Lord was descended from Judah" (Heb. 7:14). But how? "Judah was the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar" (Matt. 1:3). This is especially striking. God, in His great grace, rises above the sin and folly of man to bring about His own purposes of love and mercy... How plain it is that when we reach the close of the first chapter of Matthew, it is "God manifest in the flesh" we find. Man could never have devised such a genealogy.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Duty. The command was a levirate marriage. When a man died childless, his brother fathered a child to keep the dead man's name and inheritance alive in Israel.

- Dread. Israel saw a blotted-out name as a mark of God's displeasure. Every Hebrew woman's hope of childbearing touched the promise of "the woman's seed."

- Descent. Judah had already chosen his own wife by sight, with no thought of choosing according to the mind of God.

- Denial. Onan took the marriage and refused the child. God judged his selfishness — a sin he repeated, not a single lapse.

- Deliverance. The line two sons could not continue ran on to Christ — a genealogy naming Tamar that no man would have designed.

Genesis 38:9 · Darby

But when Onan knew that the seed should not be his own, it came to pass when he went in to his brother's wife, that he spilled [it] on the ground, in order to give no seed to his brother.

Genesis 38 pauses the story of Joseph and turns to Judah's family. Verse 9 shows a man taking his brother's widow while making sure she would never bear his brother's heir. The act looks technical. Commentators look behind it to the motive, and to why the Lord answered it with death.

The Duty Onan Refused

Behind the verse stands a custom that later became law in Israel. Its aim was not private happiness but the survival of a family line and its land.

One marked exception was needed to keep up tribal inheritance in Israel: a levirate, or brother-in-law, marriage. It existed elsewhere too, but it applied to no other people as it did to Israel, and still less to a Christian. It was used when a man died childless. His brother or next of kin then had to raise up a child for the dead man. The aim was to bind up the family line and the inheritance. This mattered so much that if the nearer kinsman refused, the widow had the right to take off his shoe in public and spit in his face.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What was at stake for the widow and the dead man was more than property.

The law made a merciful provision: no man's family should die out while a brother was still alive to carry on the line. In Israel, to be childless was a disgrace. For a man's name to be blotted out — his family dying out — counted as a special mark of God's displeasure.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Real Sin: Selfishness

The verse itself gives the motive: Onan knew the child would not count as his. One writer names the sin behind that, and reads verse 9 as "whenever," not "when" — a habit, not one lapse.

Onan married Tamar but then refused to grant her the privilege of being the mother of Judah's heir. He was prepared to marry her and enjoy the relationship, but he wanted to hold back from giving of his strength. In Onan's case, the sin that is so displeasing to God was not simply spilling his seed on the ground. It was selfishness. He wanted her to stay a childless and despised widow, and that desire ruled his whole attitude. It was not a single sin but a repeated one, for the word "when" in verse 9 should read "whenever."

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Another writer calls it a broken agreement.

Onan, the second son, agreed to take Er's widow as his wife so as to have a child who would count as his brother's. But he did not honour his side of the agreement, and the Lord considered this serious enough to kill him too. The reason was his complete selfishness: the child would not count as his own, though in fact it would be.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

God's Direct Dealing

Genesis names God in two ways, and the difference matters. One writer marks where the name "Jehovah" appears in the book.

In the rest of the book, "Jehovah" appears in only three places. The first is Judah's case, chapter 38:7-10, where one sees His special ways and His government. The second is Joseph sold and in trial, chapter 39. The third is Jacob's waiting for His salvation. We often get "God" — His dealings as ruling all things, in contrast with men.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Line Under Attack

This is the family through whom the Messiah would come, and the chapter opens a crisis over who will carry that line forward.

This passage gives us the first crisis of succession in Judah. We know that our Lord came from Judah, so we can see Satan breaking into the situation. His aim was always to hinder the coming and work of the Messiah.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

One writer asks why this chapter breaks into the story of Joseph at all.

It seems the sorry story of Judah is told to bring out all the more how Joseph stood firm under a temptation of the same kind. Judah appears to have been among the better behaved of Jacob's sons. Yet the practices that marked him and his family were evil, and clearly accepted as nothing unusual.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Grace at the End of It

Onan refused to raise up his brother's line. It came anyway, and Scripture kept the record of the failure.

Tamar's sin was the very thing that brought her into the Lord's genealogy. And it is simply as sinners that we have the right to rejoice in a work done for sinners. In a day that is near, Judah will find his right standing not in legal righteousness, and not in mere descent from Abraham, but in the truth that God has stressed for us here.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Duty. The custom protected two things: a dead man's name and inheritance, and his widow's hope of a child.

- Withholding. Onan took the marriage and refused the duty. Commentators put the offence in his selfishness, and in a habit he kept repeating.

- Government. The chapter uses God's covenant name, Jehovah. These deaths were His own direct dealing with Judah's line.

- Design. The Messiah would come through this line. Onan refused the very heir it needed, and Satan's hand was behind the crisis.

- Grace. The line survived. Tamar's name stands in the Lord's genealogy, sin and all, so that sinners may rejoice in a work done for sinners.

Genesis 38:10 · Darby

And the thing which he did was evil in the sight of Jehovah, and he slew him also.

This is the second death in Judah's family, and Genesis marks it with the name "the LORD." Two questions follow. What was so evil in what Onan did? And why does this dark story sit inside the family line that leads to the Messiah?

Onan's Real Sin

The act described in verse 9 was not the whole offence. Onan took the marriage and refused the duty that came with it.

Onan married Tamar, but then refused to grant her the privilege of being the mother of Judah's heir. He was prepared to marry her and enjoy relations with her, but he wanted to hold back his strength. In Onan's case, the sin that so displeases God was not simply spilling his seed on the ground. It was selfishness. He wanted her to stay a childless and despised widow, and that desire drove everything he did. It was not a single sin but a repeated one, for the word "when" in verse 9 should read "whenever."

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Another writer frames it as an agreement made and then broken:

He did not keep his side of the agreement, and the Lord considered this serious enough to kill him too. The reason was his complete selfishness: the child would not count as his own, even though it really would be.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The Name Used Here

Which name for God the text uses matters here. Genesis does not simply say "God." It uses "the LORD" — Jehovah.

In the rest of the book, the name "Jehovah" is used in only a few places. One is Judah's case, chapter 38:7-10, where you can see that these are His own special ways and His government. Another is Joseph sold and in trial, chapter 39. Another is after Dan, where Jacob waits for His salvation, chapter 49:18 — the longing of an Israelite for the coming kingdom.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

So this death is not bad luck. It is God dealing with Judah's house in His own government.

A House That Broke Down

Onan's death is the second in a row. Judah watched his own household fall apart under God's hand.

Judah could have cried out, "My house is not so with God!" Er, his firstborn, "was wicked in the sight of the LORD, and the LORD put him to death." Then Onan, his second son, rebelled against his father's command, and the Lord killed him too.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Judah had married into Canaan, and the results showed in his sons.

Judah was to be the leading royal tribe and the ancestor of the King of kings. Yet he shamelessly takes a daughter of Canaan for himself. No wonder that wickedness killed his firstborn, and disgrace killed his brother.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Three Names Suggest

Some writers find meaning in the names of Judah's three sons. They read the loss of the first two as a picture of God's dealings with the nation.

Judah's line still continues on the earth, even though God's wrath is on the first two sons. Their names speak of "enmity" (Er) and "iniquity" (Onan). But the third son, Shelah ("sprout"?), speaks of divine power in resurrection, bringing life out of death. In this way God preserves a remnant.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The text itself does not give these meanings. Commentators offer them as a suggestion.

Judgment That Does Not End the Line

This chapter is one of the ugliest in Genesis, yet God does not abandon Judah. The same story that records two deaths also carries the line that leads to Christ.

Yet from this guilty Judah, and from Tamar, came the One who cleanses from all sin by His blood. He will reign over the universe to God's glory. That reign goes far beyond all that Joseph pictured, just as He went far lower in humiliation and suffering.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God's answer to this chapter is not to cover it up.

Tamar's name appears in the Lord's genealogy in the gospel of Matthew. Her sin alone brought her there, and God has taken pains to record this striking fact — and to record it twice. In the same way, simply as sinners, we have the right to rejoice in a work done for the need of sinners.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Selfishness — the sin was not one physical act. It was a settled refusal to give his brother an heir, repeated every time. Verse 9 means "whenever," not "once."

- Seen — the name "the LORD" marks this death. It shows God's own ways and His government at work in Judah's house.

- Sown — Judah married into Canaan, and he reaped the harvest in his sons. What the father allowed, the next generation acted out.

- Spared — two sons are gone, but a third remains. Some read Shelah's name as "sprout": a remnant brought out of death.

- Saved — the line God judged is the line God kept. Tamar's name stands in Christ's genealogy, and it was her sin that brought her there.

Genesis 38:11 · Darby

And Judah said to Tamar his daughter-in-law, Remain a widow in thy father's house, until Shelah my son is grown; for he said, Lest he die also, as his brethren. And Tamar went and remained in her father's house.

Judah has just buried two sons, and now he speaks to the widow they left behind. His words sound like a promise: a home, a wait, then marriage when his youngest son is grown. But the verse also tells us what he was thinking, and the two do not match.

Judah's unrighteousness

Judah's arrangement looks like care. In fact it keeps from Tamar what was hers by right, and one writer also finds a flaw in the plan itself:

Tamar had the right to be the mother of Judah's heir. He kept that right from her, and in doing so he blamed her for the death of his sons. He did not blame his own sons for any wrong. Judah's favouritism towards his own family blinded him to the truth… Many people today let family ties sway their judgment in important matters. Judah's values are twisted. On a practical note, the idea that Shelah could be a husband before he was full grown also goes against the mind of God… Every area of life calls for maturity: physical, mental and emotional. Shelah was much younger than Tamar, and that was not a good recipe for a marriage.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Notice where Judah puts the blame. He fears for Shelah, so he sends Tamar away, and his own sons go unblamed.

A promise never kept

Judah's promise had a date on it: "till Shelah my son grows up."

Judah promised Tamar that she could marry Shelah when he was grown, since he was still young. In the meantime he asked her to remain a widow in her father's house. But we shall see that Judah failed to keep his promise, just as the tribe of Judah has done again and again.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Tamar's obedience

Tamar obeyed. She went back to her father's house and stayed there. Her willingness shows what she wanted:

Tamar had the natural desire for children. She was clearly content to wait until Judah's third son was old enough to be her husband. That seemed to show she valued her place in the family of Jacob.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

When waiting turns to scheming

Her patience did not last. Later she took matters into her own hands, and one writer weighs both sides:

Her desire for children was a right one. We can admire how she valued a place in the family where God's Name was known, and the righteous, trusting qualities she showed in her patient waiting as a widow. But we cannot excuse what she did to get what she wanted. It showed a lack of confidence in God, and the sin itself was unnatural… How ready we are by nature to try to get God's blessing in our own way.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The same failure repeated in David

Judah's neglect of Tamar is the first of three failures here. All three show up again in a later king:

Judah's failure has features that strongly remind us of David's failure. First, Judah neglected his duty towards Tamar. Second, he indulged the flesh and so badly dishonoured the Name of the Lord. Third, he was quick to pass the death sentence on evil he was guilty of himself. Do we not see these very same features in the failure of King David?

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Grace at the end of the line

Everything in this chapter runs downhill. Yet the line to the King of kings runs straight through it, and it is not Judah who rescues it:

Judah was to be the royal tribe above all others, and the ancestor of the King of kings. Yet he takes a daughter of Canaan for himself with no regard for God. No wonder wickedness killed his firstborn, and disgraceful conduct his brother. No wonder the widow got no regard from the third son… Such is man, and such Judah; but such too is God. Where terrible sin increased, grace increased far more.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Right withheld — Tamar had the right to be the mother of Judah's heir. Judah told her to go home and wait, which looked like care but kept that right from her.

- Blame misplaced — Judah feared for Shelah, so he treated Tamar as the danger. His own sons he did not blame at all.

- Promise broken — Judah never kept the promise he made about Shelah. Writers see in that broken word a pattern the tribe of Judah repeated.

- Waiting misused — We can admire Tamar's waiting and how she valued a place in Jacob's family. Her later scheme has no excuse, since it showed a lack of confidence in God.

- Grace exceeding — The chapter runs downhill from here. Still the line to the King runs through it, because where sin increased, grace increased far more.

Genesis 38:12 · Darby

And as the days were multiplied, Judah's wife, the daughter of Shua, died. And Judah was comforted, and he went up to his sheep-shearers, to Timnah, he and his friend Hirah the Adullamite.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Genesis 38:13 · Darby

And it was told Tamar, saying, Behold thy father-in-law is going up to Timnah to shear his sheep.

This verse is one line of news, and it turns the whole chapter. Everything before it explains why Tamar listens; everything after it follows from what she does with what she hears.

A man away from his brothers

Judah had left his brothers and settled among the Canaanites. By this point he is deep into that life. One writer reads the opening phrase of the chapter as a signal for everything that follows.

Judah leaves his brothers to join the world of the Canaanite (the Merchant) in all its ruined character. The actual words of Scripture, "went down from," show the path of departure he took. They warn the reader that what follows will be marked by sin. The consequences of Judah's deliberate departure will be serious. He will have to learn that he cannot please himself without reaping a harvest of sorrow. He has to learn that whatever one sows, that will he also reap (Gal. 6:7).

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

One writer traces the evil in Judah's house back to Judah himself.

The chapter needs few words to prove how low Judah had sunk morally... It was not Reuben or any other of the tribal heads, but Judah, who proposed the sale of Joseph. Now he showed in his own house the evil that drew down curse on curse. In the end the head of that house had to admit the sad shame of Tamar — more righteous than himself, who had sentenced her to die by fire.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Sheep-shearing time

The detail about shearing is not filler. Scripture mentions it rarely, and never in a good light.

Only four times in scripture do we read of sheep shearing. First, in Genesis 31:19; second here in Genesis 38:13 (Judah); third in 1 Samuel 25:4 (Nabal); and fourth in 2 Samuel 13:23 (Absalom). In each case, something unpleasantly selfish is involved. Peter was not told by the Lord to "shear My sheep," but "shepherd My sheep" and "feed My sheep" (John 21:16-17).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The local religion also supplied the disguise Tamar would use.

This shameful episode happened at sheep-shearing time, when something is taken from the sheep. To take and leave naked is Satan's work. The practices of the Canaanite religion increased sexual temptation. Ritual sex was part of their fertility magic. It seems Tamar posed as a temple prostitute. Such was the world that Judah had married into!

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Why the news mattered to Tamar

Tamar had waited as a widow for the marriage Judah promised her. By the time this news reaches her, the waiting has become a wrong.

Tamar had the right to be the mother of Judah's heir. He kept that right from her, in effect blaming her for the death of his sons. He did not blame his own sons for any wrong. Judah's prejudice in favour of his own family blinded him to the truth.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

So the news of Judah's journey becomes her opening.

Eventually Judah's wife died. Judah was not driven to the feet of the Lord by that loss, but turned to the company of one whom he thought was a prostitute. He had promised to give his youngest son Shelah to Tamar, but had not kept his promise. She therefore took matters into her own hands and deceitfully posed as a prostitute to seduce Judah (vv. 13-15).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

How to weigh Tamar

She is not simply a victim, and not simply a schemer.

Her desire for children was a right one. We can admire the value she put on a place in the family where God's Name was known, and the righteous, trusting spirit shown in her patient waiting as a widow. But her actions to reach that end cannot be excused. She lacked confidence in God, and the sin itself was unnatural... How ready we are by nature to seek God's blessing in our own way.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The line that runs through the ruin

The astonishing part is where this shameful story leads.

Out of this shameful history it is amazing to think that God has seen fit to bring about wonderful blessing. For Judah, Tamar and Pharez are all recorded in the genealogy of the Lord Jesus in Matthew 1:3. In fact, Tamar is one of only four women mentioned in that genealogy — Tamar, Rahab, Ruth and "the wife of Uriah" (Matt. 1:3-6). But this is meant to impress on us the wonder of God's pure grace, reaching guilty sinners through the gift of His holy, sinless Son!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Departure. Judah "went down from" his brothers, and the sorrow of this chapter is the harvest of that choice — a man reaps what he sows.

- Season. Sheep-shearing appears only four times in Scripture, and selfishness marks each one — it is the season for taking.

- Broken word. Judah broke his promise and kept Tamar's right from her; favouritism for his own family blinded him.

- Mixed motive. We can admire her longing for a place in the family that knew God; we cannot excuse her deceit — she sought God's blessing her own way.

- Grace. Judah, Tamar and Pharez still stand in the genealogy of Matthew 1:3 — pure grace reaching guilty sinners.

Genesis 38:14 · Darby

And she put the garments of her widowhood off from her, and covered herself with a veil, and wrapped herself, and sat in the entry of Enaim, which is on the way to Timnah; for she saw that Shelah was grown, and she was not given to him as wife.

Tamar had watched Judah's youngest son grow up, but the promised marriage never came. So she traded her widow's clothes for a veil and sat by the road Judah would travel — the act the whole chapter turns on.

A promise Judah never kept

Tamar's action begins with Judah's failure, not her own. He had told her to wait as a widow in her father's house until Shelah was old enough, and then never delivered.

Judah promised Tamar that she could marry Shelah when he was grown up, since Shelah was still young. In the meantime he asked her to stay a widow in her father's house. But we shall see that Judah failed to keep his promise, just as the tribe of Judah has done again and again.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Judah withheld something she had a right to. Then he shifted the blame onto her.

Tamar had the right to be the mother of Judah's heir. He withheld this rightful claim from her, and in effect blamed her for the death of his sons. He did not blame his own sons for any wrong. Judah's bias towards his own family blinded him to the truth… To make Shelah a husband before he was full grown would also have been contrary to the mind of God. Maturity is assumed in every area of life: physical, mental and emotional. Shelah was much younger than Tamar, and this was not a good recipe for a marriage.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

How Judah came to be on that road

Tamar waits by that road because Judah will travel it. He is on it because of a choice he made at the start of the chapter: he left his brothers for the Canaanites.

Judah leaves his brothers to join the world of the Canaanite in all its ruined character. The actual words of Scripture, "went down from," show the path of departure he set out on. They warn the reader that sin will mark what follows. The results of Judah's wilful departure will be serious. He will have to learn that he cannot please himself without reaping a harvest of sorrow.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

The veil and the world it belonged to

The disguise she chose came from the culture around her.

The practices of the Canaanite cult increased sexual temptation. Ritual fornication was part of their fertility magic. It seems that Tamar posed as a temple prostitute. Such was the world that Judah had married into!

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

She would not wait any longer.

She took matters into her own hands. She used deceit, posing as a prostitute to seduce Judah.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Two ways to weigh Tamar

Commentators differ. Some see real value in what she wanted, but refuse to excuse how she got it.

Her desire for children was a right one. We can admire how much she valued a place in the family where God's Name was known. We can admire too the righteous and trusting qualities she showed in her patient waiting as a widow. But we cannot excuse what she did to reach her goal. It showed a lack of confidence in God, and the sin itself was unnatural. Her deceit showed the natural scheming that is only too common among those whom God has brought into a place of privilege.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Others find nothing here to soften. For them the wonder lies elsewhere.

In all this history of Tamar's there is no redeeming feature. She comes before me in this picture as a sinner and nothing else. She was the wife of two men, one after the other, and divine judgment cut off each of them for his wickedness. Yet she herself dares to provoke that same judgment by a crime equal to theirs. But the wonder above all this is that this very sin brings her name into the Lord's genealogy.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Her place in Christ's family line

This dark chapter is where mercy shows itself.

Tamar's history shows the boundlessness of divine mercy. We see God's own wonderful way of connecting Christ with Judah, and so Tamar is listed in the genealogy recorded in Matthew's Gospel. She is the first of the four women mentioned there, each with her own special place by God's grace.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Grace, not human planning, produced that line.

This is one of those remarkable cases where divine grace triumphs gloriously over man's sin. God, in His great grace, rises above the sin and folly of man to bring about His own purposes of love and mercy… Man could never have devised such a genealogy. It is entirely divine.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Departure. Judah "went down from" his brothers first; every sorrow in this chapter grows out of that one step away.

- Debt. Judah owed Tamar his son Shelah. He never paid that debt, and he let her carry the blame for his sons' deaths.

- Disguise. She exchanged the widow's clothes for a veil, taking matters into her own hands instead of waiting on God.

- Discernment. Her longing for a place among God's people was right; her scheming to get it was not. Commentators differ on how much credit her patience deserves.

- Design. The one deed with no redeeming feature is the very deed that puts her name in Christ's genealogy. No man could have designed that line.

Genesis 38:15 · Darby

And Judah saw her, and took her for a harlot; because she had covered her face.

Genesis 38 breaks off the story of Joseph and follows Judah down a road of his own choosing. Verse 15 is the moment the trap closes. A veiled woman waits by the roadside, and Judah does not know his own daughter-in-law. Two questions press on the reader: what did the disguise mean, and how does God work through a scene like this?

The road down

The chapter opens with Judah leaving his brothers. One writer reads the wording of that departure as a warning sign.

Judah leaves his brothers to join the world of the Canaanite (the Merchant) in all its ruined character. The actual words of Scripture, "went down from," show the course of departure he had set out on. They warn the reader that sin will mark what follows. The consequences of Judah's wilful departure will be serious. He will have to learn that he cannot please himself without reaping a harvest of sorrow. He has to learn that whatever one sows, that will he also reap (Gal. 6:7). The heart that has strayed from God is easy prey to the deceit and enticements of men. Anyone who does not walk closely with God will soon walk with the unconverted men of the world.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

The broken promise

One writer traces Tamar's disguise back to a promise Judah never kept, and shows what Judah did after his loss.

Eventually Judah's wife died. Judah was not driven to the feet of the Lord by this, but turned to the company of one whom he thought was a prostitute. He had promised to give his youngest son Shelah to Tamar, but had not kept his promise. So she took matters into her own hands and deceitfully posed as a prostitute to seduce Judah (vv. 13-15).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

What Judah took her for

Judah took the woman for a prostitute because such women were a normal part of the culture around him.

This sordid event took place at sheep-shearing, the time when something was taken from the sheep. To take and leave naked is Satan's work. The practices of the Canaanite cult increased sexual temptation. Ritual fornication was part of their fertility magic. It seems that Tamar posed as a temple prostitute. Such was the world that Judah had married into!

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Commentators have argued over the Hebrew word used in this chapter for such a woman. One writer sets aside the idea that it named a holy woman.

I doubt that many serious readers will agree with one scholar's notion that the Hebrew word means a holy woman or seer. Far more probable is the ordinary view, which supposes a "consecration" to the corrupt Astarte, or Venus, of early and later idolatry. Terrible to say, prostitution was an almost universal element of heathen holiness!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The man who condemned her

Later Judah called for Tamar's punishment, though he had drawn her into the sin himself.

What a hypocrite! Judah acts as if he is completely right and blameless, but it is he who has the greater guilt. It was he who caused Tamar to stumble, and now he wants her punished. If I cause another to sin because of my own wickedness, how great then is my responsibility. He has a double standard, which is not acceptable to a holy God. Judah is ready to condemn Tamar to be burnt, but she had secured a pledge from him. She now brought this forward as evidence (v. 25), and everyone saw Judah's part in the sin. Tamar is acknowledged to be more righteous than Judah (v. 26).

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Grace at the end of the chapter

The story excuses nothing. Yet its names reappear in the opening pages of Matthew's Gospel.

We need not dwell on this. We only note that the Tamar of this chapter is the first of the women listed in the genealogy of our Lord in Matthew 1. Of the four women mentioned, only Ruth had a clean record morally, and she came from an accursed race. Such names would never have appeared in the record without the grace of God — the grace that triumphs over human sin.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

We rank sins on a scale God does not use.

In our thoughts, the way of the harlot and the tax collector is worse than the easy, respectable course of the world. If we had the balances of the sanctuary, we would weigh things differently. "What is exalted among men is an abomination in the sight of God."

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Down — "Went down from his brothers" sets the direction of the chapter. Judah left God's people first; the roadside meeting came later.

- Disguise — Judah broke his promise to give Shelah to Tamar. So she covered her face and posed as a prostitute.

- Defilement — Canaanite religion used ritual fornication in its fertility magic. That was the world Judah had married into.

- Double standard — Judah demanded Tamar's death by fire for a sin he had drawn her into. The pledge in her hand exposed him.

- Deliverance — Tamar stands first among the women in Matthew's genealogy. Her name is there only because the grace of God triumphs over human sin.

Genesis 38:16 · Darby

And he turned aside to her by the way, and said, Come, I pray thee, let me go in to thee; for he did not know that she was his daughter-in-law. And she said, What wilt thou give me, that thou mayest come in to me?

Judah is travelling to his sheepshearers after his wife's death. He stops for a veiled woman by the road and starts bargaining. He does not know her: she is Tamar, his son's widow. He had promised her to another son and then left her waiting.

Why this story sits here

This chapter cuts into the story of Joseph. One writer reads that placement as deliberate: Judah's fall stands next to Joseph's stand under a similar test.

Genesis 38 cuts the story of Joseph off completely. Genesis 39 picks it up again and tells at once of the great temptation that faced him. The sad story of Judah seems to be placed here for a reason. It heightens our sense of how firmly Joseph stood under a temptation of the same kind. Judah seems to have been one of the better behaved sons of Jacob. Yet the practices that marked him and his family were evil, and clearly accepted as nothing very unusual.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The promise Judah never kept

Tamar is on that road because of a right Judah owed her and held back. One writer also names what blinded him.

Tamar had the right to be the mother of Judah's heir. He withheld this legitimate entitlement from her, effectively blaming her for the death of his sons. He did not blame his own sons for any wrong. Judah's prejudice in favour of his own family blinded him to the truth... Many today allow the ties of nature to sway their judgment in matters of importance.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

A man not turned toward God

Judah had just buried his wife. Grief could have driven him to God. It drove him to a roadside bargain instead.

Judah was not driven to the feet of the Lord by this, but turned to the company of one whom he thought was a prostitute. He had promised to give his youngest son Shelah to Tamar, but had not kept his promise. So she took matters into her own hands. She posed as a prostitute to deceive and seduce Judah. He promised to send her a young goat as payment for his immorality. She then demanded security, and he gave her three things that were clearly his own.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Two sinners, not one victim

Judah later calls Tamar more righteous than himself. But writers do not treat her trap as an act of faith.

Tamar lay in wait for Judah. She may have valued a place in the family that knew the true God. Even so, her action did not spring from faith in God. On a human level, her act was more righteous than Judah's, as he confessed. But morally the two were alike, partners in a serious sin. Behaviour like this might suit Canaanite families. But it was hateful to the holiness of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The double standard that got exposed

Three months later the truth came out, and Judah ordered the pregnant woman burned.

What a hypocrite! Judah acts as if he is completely right and without blame, but it is he who has the greater guilt. It was he who caused Tamar to stumble and now he wants her punished. If I cause another to sin because of my own wickedness, how great then is my responsibility... He has a double standard, which is not acceptable to a holy God... A frank confession will secure His mercy.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

The sin that led into Christ's family line

The strangest turn is what God does with this roadside transaction. Tamar's name appears in the list of Jesus' ancestors. One writer presses the point that it was not her goodness that put it there.

In Tamar's whole story, what strikes me is that there is nothing good in it at all... She comes before me in this picture as a sinner and nothing else. But the wonder above all this is that this very sin brings her name into the Lord's family line. It was this sin that made her the mother of Pharez, one of the direct ancestors of Christ!

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The chapter ends with the head of the family admitting he was the guilty one. That admission is where the line to Christ runs on.

It was not Reuben or any other of the tribal heads who proposed the sale of Joseph. It was Judah. And now his own house showed the evil that drew down curse on curse. In the end its head had to own the sad shame of Tamar — more righteous than himself — whom he had sentenced to die by fire. Yet by this guilty Judah, and by Tamar, came He who cleanses from all sin by His blood.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Promise — Judah owed Tamar a husband and held him back to shield his own son. Her plan starts with his broken word.

- Blindness — grief did not turn him to God. He turned aside to a stranger and bargained over the price, not knowing who she was.

- Shared guilt — writers do not make Tamar innocent. She was more righteous than Judah, yet both shared one sin.

- Exposure — the security he handed over was clearly his own. His double standard ended in confession.

- Grace — the very sin that shames him is the link in the line to Christ, who cleanses from all sin by His blood.

Genesis 38:17 · Darby

And he said, I will send [thee] a kid of the goats from the flock. And she said, Wilt thou give [me] a pledge, until thou send it?

Genesis 38 leaves Joseph's story to follow Judah into a roadside deal with a veiled woman. He does not know she is his own daughter-in-law, and the pledge he gives her will later decide a life.

The bargain itself

The verse records a price and a guarantee. One writer retells how the deal came about, and what Judah handed over to seal it:

Judah was not driven to the feet of the Lord by this, but turned to the company of one whom he thought was a prostitute. He had promised to give his youngest son Shelah to Tamar, but had not kept his promise. So she took matters into her own hands. She used deceit and posed as a prostitute to seduce Judah. He promised to send her a young goat as payment for his fornication. She demanded some security, and he gave her three things that were clearly his own property.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Why Tamar wanted a pledge

Her demand for security did not come out of nowhere. Judah already owed her something, and he was holding it back:

Tamar had the right to be the mother of Judah's heir. He held back this right that was hers, and in effect blamed her for the death of his sons. He did not blame his own sons for any wrong. Judah's prejudice in favour of his own family blinded him to the truth. Many today let family ties sway their judgment in important matters.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Judah had promised her his youngest son, Shelah, and never kept his word. So when he now promises a goat, she asks for something in hand.

More than a private sin

The line that leads to the Messiah runs through Judah. That raises the stakes of this roadside bargain:

This passage gives us the first crisis of succession in Judah. We know that our Lord came from Judah. So we can see Satan pushing his way into these events. His design was always to hinder the coming and work of the Messiah. Note that this threatens more than Tamar's security. It threatens her right to become the mother of Judah's heir.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

The pledge becomes the evidence

The pledge of verse 17 comes back into the story later. Judah demands Tamar's death, and the pledge is what answers him:

Judah acts as if he is completely right and without blame, but it is he who has the greater guilt. It was he who caused Tamar to stumble, and now he wants her punished. If I cause someone else to sin by my own wickedness, how great my responsibility is... Judah is ready to condemn Tamar to be burned, but she had secured a pledge from him. She now brought it forward as evidence, and everyone saw that Judah shared in the sin. This is the way God works. A frank confession will secure His mercy... Having established righteousness He is now free to show mercy.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Grace at the far end

The story does not stay a scandal. One writer finds nothing good in Tamar's record at all:

She comes before me in this picture as a sinner and nothing else. She was the wife of two men, one after the other, and divine judgment cut off each of them for his wickedness. Yet she dares in her own person to provoke divine judgment by a crime equal to theirs. But the wonder above all this is that it is this very sin that brings her name into the Lord's genealogy — for it was this sin that made her the mother of Perez, one of the direct line in Christ's ancestry.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer traces the same line from Judah's house to Christ:

It was Judah, not Reuben or any other of the tribal heads, who proposed the sale of Joseph. Then he showed in his own house the evil that drew down curse on curse, until the head of that house had to admit the sad shame of Tamar, more righteous than himself, though he had sentenced her to die by fire. Yet through this guilty Judah, and through Tamar, came He who cleanses from all sin by His blood, and who will reign over the universe to God's glory.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Promise broken. Judah had withheld from Tamar her right to bear his heir; the bargain of verse 17 grows out of a promise he never kept.

- Pledge taken. She would not accept a payment still owed. She asked for security in hand, and Judah handed over three things that were clearly his own.

- Proof produced. The pledge came back as evidence. It exposed the man who was ready to burn her for the sin he had led her into.

- Pardon granted. Judah owned the truth and confessed it. Having established righteousness, God was free to show mercy.

- Line preserved. Through this guilty pair came Perez — and through that line, the One who cleanses from all sin by His blood.

Genesis 38:18 · Darby

And he said, What pledge shall I give thee? And she said, Thy signet, and thy lace, and thy staff which is in thy hand. And he gave [it] her, and went in to her; and she conceived by him.

Judah's meeting with Tamar turns on one small deal. He hands over the three things that prove who he is, and three months later they come back as evidence against him.

What the three items were

A signet was a seal. Here is how people carried it and what it did.

Stones with words, letters, or symbols engraved on them. In ancient times people pierced them and hung them from the arm or the neck by a cord or chain, or set them in rings and wore them on the finger. The design was pressed into pieces of clay attached to official documents. In the East people do not treat such documents as genuine unless they are sealed.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So Judah handed over his signature, its cord, and his staff. His whole public identity was now in a stranger's hands.

How Judah came to be in that place

This verse is one step in a longer slide. Judah's wife had died, and the loss did not turn him back to God.

Judah's wife Shuah died… Judah was not driven to the feet of the Lord by this. Instead he turned to the company of one whom he thought was a prostitute. He had promised to give his youngest son Shelah to Tamar, but he had not kept his promise. So Tamar took matters into her own hands. She deceitfully posed as a prostitute to seduce Judah (vv. 13-15). He promised to send her a young goat as payment for his fornication. She demanded some security, and he gave her three things that were plainly his own (v. 18).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The surroundings had shaped him too. He had married into Canaanite life, and that life had its own religious sins.

This shameful event happened at sheep-shearing time, the time when something is taken from the sheep. To take and leave naked is Satan's work. The practices of the Canaanite cult increased sexual temptation. Ritual fornication was part of their fertility magic. It seems that Tamar posed as a temple prostitute. Such was the world that Judah had married into!

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

The pledge becomes evidence

The pledge came back as a witness against the man who gave it. It reached him just as he was passing sentence on someone else.

Judah acts as if he is completely right and blameless. Yet he is the one with the greater guilt. It was he who caused Tamar to stumble, and now he wants her punished. If I cause someone else to sin by my own wickedness, how great is my responsibility… Judah is ready to condemn Tamar to be burnt. But she had secured a pledge from him. She now brought it forward as evidence (v. 25), and everyone saw Judah's own share in the sin. This is the way God works. A frank confession will secure His mercy.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

The judge who had to own his own sin

The man who had proposed selling Joseph is now the man exposed.

It was not Reuben or any other of the tribal heads, but Judah, who proposed the sale of Joseph. Now he showed in his own house the evil which drew down curse on curse. In the end the head of that house had to own the sad shame of Tamar — more righteous than himself, though he had sentenced her to die by fire. Yet through this guilty Judah, and through Tamar, came He who cleanses from all sin by His blood.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why this chapter stands where it does

The story of Joseph stops for a chapter, and the contrast is deliberate.

Genesis 38 interrupts the story of Joseph… It seems that Judah's shameful story is told here to sharpen in our minds how firmly Joseph stood under a similar temptation… The Tamar of this chapter is the first of the women named in the genealogy of our Lord in Matthew 1. Of the four women named, only Ruth had a clean record morally, and she came of an accursed race. Such names would never have appeared in the record without the grace of God — the grace that triumphs over human sin.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The warning for us

Tamar wanted something legitimate — a place in the family — but seized it by scheming.

Her desire for children was a right one. We can admire how she valued a place in the family where God's name was known… But her actions to achieve her ends cannot be excused. They showed a lack of confidence in God, and the sin itself was unnatural… How ready we are by nature to try to get God's blessing in our own way.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Drift. His wife's death did not drive Judah to the Lord. It drove him to a stranger by the roadside.

- Pledge. A signet was an engraved seal on a cord, used to prove a document was genuine. Judah gave away the three things that could only be his.

- Proof. What he gave in the dark came back in daylight as evidence. It reached him while he was condemning another for his own sin.

- Confession. He owned that she was more righteous than himself. A frank confession is where God's mercy meets a person.

- Grace. Tamar's name stands in the genealogy of Christ. Such names stand there only because grace triumphs over human sin.

Genesis 38:19 · Darby

And she arose and went away; and she laid by her veil from her, and put on the garments of her widowhood.

Genesis 38:19 is the quietest verse in a loud chapter: Tamar changes her clothes and goes home. In one move she hides every trace of the roadside — yet she leaves with a child and with the pledge that will one day name the father.

Why she was dressed as a widow at all

The clothing she returns to is the mark of a promise Judah never kept. Judah left her waiting for a son he never gave her.

Tamar had the right to be the mother of Judah's heir. He kept this right from her, and in doing so blamed her for the death of his sons. He did not blame his own sons for any wrong. Judah's prejudice in favour of his own family blinded him to the truth.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

The disguise she takes off

She takes off more than a roadside disguise. Commentators tie her costume to the religion of the land Judah had settled into.

The practices of the Canaanite religion made sexual temptation stronger. Ritual fornication was part of their fertility magic. It seems that Tamar posed as a temple prostitute. Such was the world that Judah had married into! Can there be anything so dreadful as this kind of union?

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

The cover-up that held — for a while

Verse 19 is the move that makes Judah's search fail. His messenger goes back with the payment and finds nobody.

At once she left the area and changed her clothes, going back to her widow's state. Of course, Judah then sent the young goat, expecting to get back the pledge he had left. But his messenger could not find the prostitute. He was even told that no prostitute had been in that place.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Hidden things brought to light

The disguise held for a time, but not for good. Commentators take episodes like this as a warning about secret sin everywhere.

Everything must come to light. The stream may flow for a time underground, but sooner or later it will break out. We may go on for years in a course of secret evil. We may cultivate some unholy principle, indulge some unholy desire, or feed some unholy temper or feeling. But the smouldering flame must break out in the end, and show us the real character of what we have done.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What breaks the case open is the very security Tamar asked for before she changed clothes. She kept the evidence; Judah kept the double standard.

Judah acts as if he is right and free of blame. But it is he who has the greater guilt… Judah is ready to have Tamar burnt, but she had secured a pledge from him. She now brought it forward as evidence (v. 25), and everyone saw Judah's part in the sin. This is the way God works. A frank confession will secure His mercy. Tamar is acknowledged as being more righteous than Judah (v. 26)… Having established righteousness He is now free to show mercy.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

What the widow's clothes were hiding

Under those garments a child was growing, and the line to Christ ran through him. That is why this sordid chapter is not hidden away.

The history of Tamar shows us in God's own marvellous way how Christ comes into connection with Judah. So her name appears in the Lord's genealogy in the gospel of Matthew. It is the first of four women's names there, and their presence shows the grace which has stooped to take up men. Each of these four has its own gospel feature to bring out. The record presses Tamar's sin, as it presses Rahab's faith… Tamar's sin alone brought her into the Lord's genealogy, and God has taken pains to record this striking fact, and to record it twice.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Withheld. Tamar wore widow's clothes because Judah kept back what he owed her. The garments in verse 19 are the badge of his broken word.

- Disguised. The veil she puts off belonged to the Canaanite shrine. The world Judah married into had reached his own household.

- Concealed. Changing clothes worked for a time. The messenger came back and could find no such woman.

- Exposed. A buried stream surfaces. The pledge she had kept named the man who was ready to burn her.

- Redeemed. The child hidden under those widow's garments carried the line to Christ. Tamar's name stands in His genealogy — proof that grace stoops to take up sinners.

Genesis 38:20 · Darby

And Judah sent the kid of the goats by the hand of his friend the Adullamite, to receive the pledge from the woman's hand; but he found her not.

Judah owes a young goat for a night with a veiled stranger, and he wants back the personal items he left with her as security. He sends a friend to settle the debt, but the friend comes back empty-handed — so what happens to a sin a man cannot buy his way out of?

The errand that failed

Judah wanted a clean, private deal. One writer shows how Tamar had already made that impossible:

She left the area at once and changed her clothes, going back to her widow's dress. So Judah sent the young goat, expecting to get back the pledge he had left. His messenger could not find the prostitute. He was even told that no prostitute had ever been in that place.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

What the pledge was

The failed payment matters because of what stayed in her hands. The same writer says what she asked for, and what Judah handed over:

He promised to send her a young goat as payment for his immorality. She asked for some security, and he gave her three things that were clearly his own property. From that one occasion she conceived a child.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The friend he turned to

Judah does not go himself. He sends his friend from Adullam. One writer traces the trouble back a step further, to the day Judah left his brothers:

It is sad to watch Judah leave the relative safety and enjoyment of his brothers' company. His heart was already far from the joy of communion with his father. Now he takes this further step and leaves his brothers. We have seen this often with people whose hearts have grown cold. In time their feet follow where their minds already lean. A heart that has wandered from God is easy prey to the deceit and pressure of men. Someone who does not walk in fellowship with God will soon walk in friendship with the unconverted people of the world. In verse 1 we see that Judah must have had common interests with Hirah. In verse 12 he is called "his friend Hirah the Adullamite." James tells us that friendship with the world is enmity with God (James 4:4), but a man set on doing his own will had no room for such thoughts.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Sowing and reaping

One writer reads the whole chapter under a single rule, and Judah's private dealings do not escape it:

Judah chose to walk away, and the consequences will be serious. He will have to learn that he cannot please himself without reaping a harvest of sorrow. He has to learn that whatever one sows, that will he also reap (Galatians 6:7).

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

No cover for secret sin

Judah's plan depended on nobody knowing. One writer answers that hope from Scripture:

God knows your most secret sin... Look into the word. You will find that God has usually shamed in this world those who counted most on secrecy in their sinning.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The pledge as evidence

The items Judah could not recover come back later as evidence against him:

Judah is ready to condemn Tamar to be burnt, but she had secured a pledge from him. She now brings it forward as evidence, and everyone can see Judah's share in the sin. This is the way God works. An honest confession will secure His mercy.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Grace at the end of the line

Writers do not soften the chapter. They point instead to what God did with it:

Judah, the head of the tribe, had to admit the sad shame of Tamar. She was more righteous than he was, and he had sentenced her to die by fire. Yet through this guilty Judah, and through Tamar, came the One who cleanses from all sin by His blood. He will reign over the universe to God's glory.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer finds nothing admirable in Tamar at all, and still marvels at what came of it:

She comes before me in this picture as a sinner and nothing else... But the wonder above all this is that this very sin brings her name into the Lord's genealogy. This sin made her the mother of Perez, one of the direct line in Christ's ancestry.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Sowing. Judah left his brothers for other company. Every step that follows falls under one rule: a man cannot please himself without reaping a harvest of sorrow.

- Security. Tamar asked for security, and Judah handed over three items that were clearly his own. The debt could never be paid off in secret.

- Secrecy. The goat goes out with a friend and comes back unused. God has usually shamed those who counted most on secrecy in their sinning.

- Surrender. Tamar produces the pledge, and everyone sees Judah's part. An honest confession is what secures God's mercy.

- Sovereign grace. Through this guilty man and this woman came the One who cleanses from all sin by His blood. The very sin recorded here brings Tamar's name into Christ's family line.

Genesis 38:21 · Darby

And he asked the men of her place, saying, Where is the prostitute that was at Enaim, by the way-side? And they said, There was no prostitute here.

Judah's friend goes back to pay the debt and collect the pledge, but the woman has vanished. The men of the place say no woman like that was ever there, and what Judah left as security stays in someone else's hands.

How Judah Came to Be on That Road

The chapter opens with Judah leaving his brothers. Writers trace the whole sorry story back to that step.

Judah leaves his brothers to join the world of the Canaanite in all its ruined character. The actual words of Scripture, "went down from," show the path of departure he set out on. They warn the reader that sin will mark what follows. The consequences of Judah's wilful departure will be serious. He will have to learn that he cannot please himself without reaping a harvest of sorrow.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

The Woman by the Roadside

The ESV calls her a cult prostitute, not simply a prostitute. That word belongs to Canaanite worship.

The practices of the Canaanite cult increased sexual temptation. Ritual fornication was part of their fertility magic. It seems that Tamar posed as a temple or cult prostitute. Such was the world that Judah had married into!

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

The Errand That Failed

Why did Tamar do this at all? The answer goes back to a promise Judah never kept.

He had promised to give his youngest son Shelah to Tamar, but had not kept his promise. She therefore took matters into her own hands and deceitfully posed as a prostitute to seduce Judah. He promised to send her a young goat as payment. She demanded some security, and he gave her three things that were unmistakably his own. From that one occasion she conceived a child. She left the area at once and changed her clothes, going back to her state as a widow. Then Judah sent the young goat, expecting to get back the pledge he had left. His messenger could not find the prostitute, and the men there told him that no prostitute had ever been in that place.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Sin That Will Not Stay Buried

Judah wanted this buried. It did not stay buried, and one writer turns the warning on the reader.

How bad it is to try to cover up sin! God says, "Be sure your sin will find you out." But you must thank God if He makes your sin find you out now. If not, it will find you out when you stand before God's judgment throne. God says, "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy" (Proverbs 28:13).

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Later the evidence surfaces. Judah then demands a death sentence for the sin he committed himself.

What a hypocrite! Judah acts as if he is completely right and without blame, but it is he who has the greater guilt... Judah is ready to condemn Tamar to be burned, but she had secured a pledge from him. She now brought it forward in evidence, and everyone could see Judah's share in the sin. This is the way God works. A frank confession will secure His mercy.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Two Sinners, Not a Hero and a Villain

Judah later admits Tamar was more righteous than he was. Commentators are careful not to let that admission turn her scheme into faith.

She did value a place in the family where the true God was known. But her plan to trap Judah on the road did not spring from faith in God. Humanly speaking, her act was more righteous than Judah's, as he admitted. Yet morally they were alike — partners in a grievous sin. Conduct like this might suit the families of the Canaanites. But it was hateful to the holiness of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Line That Ran Through the Wreckage

The child conceived in this squalid encounter becomes an ancestor of Christ.

She comes before me in this picture as a sinner and nothing else. She had been the wife of two men in turn, each cut off by God's judgment for his wickedness. Yet she dared to provoke the same judgment herself. But the wonder above all this is that this very sin brings her name into the Lord's genealogy. This sin made her the mother of Perez, who stands in the direct line of Christ's ancestry.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Matthew's opening chapter names Tamar, and then Bathsheba, without embarrassment.

The Spirit of God is leading us along the line through which Christ came, and He gives us, as links in the chain, Tamar and Bathsheba!... Man could never have devised such a genealogy. It is entirely divine. No spiritual person can read it without seeing in it a blessed display of divine grace.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Departure. Judah went down from his brothers. He could not please himself without reaping a harvest of sorrow.

- Disguise. Tamar posed as a cult prostitute — the religion of the world Judah had married into.

- Discovery. Judah sends the goat, the woman is gone, his pledge stays out. Sin kept quiet is not sin cancelled.

- Double standard. Judah demands Tamar's death for his own offence; commentators call both of them partners in one grievous sin.

- Divine grace. The very sin that shames Judah puts Tamar's name in Christ's genealogy — a line no man would have designed.

Genesis 38:22 · Darby

And he returned to Judah, and said, I have not found her; and also the men of the place said, No prostitute has been here.

Judah's friend comes back empty-handed, and the townsmen say no such woman was ever there. The errand was meant to settle a debt quietly and recover what Judah had left as security.

The road that led here

This errand belongs to a road Judah took earlier in the chapter. One writer reads the chapter's opening words as a warning sign:

Judah leaves his brothers to join the world of the Canaanite (the Merchant) in all its ruined character. The actual words of Scripture, "went down from," show the course of departure he began. They alert the reader that sin will mark what follows. The consequences of Judah's wilful departure will be serious. He will have to learn that he cannot please himself without reaping a harvest of sorrow. He has to learn that "whatever one sows, that will he also reap" (Gal. 6:7).

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

An errand that failed

The young goat was the agreed price, and sending it was Judah's way of closing the account and getting his personal items back. The plain sense of what happened is stated simply:

Of course when Judah sent the young goat, expecting to get back the pledge he had left, the messenger was not only unable to find the prostitute, but was told that no prostitute had even been in that place.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The testimony of the townsmen

The men of the place give Judah a clean public record — nothing happened here, nobody saw anything. That is exactly the kind of cover that cannot hold, because God has other witnesses:

God knows your most secret sin: "You have set our iniquities before you, our secret sins in the light of your presence" (Ps. 90:8)... The word tells you of an informer you carry in your own heart: conscience. It goes along with you, and it witnesses all your carefully laid plots. What it sees, it writes down, for it is a court of record... Consult the word. You will find that God has usually put to shame in this world those who promised themselves the most secrecy in their sinning.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Judah's anxiety at this moment is about reputation, not about God. That instinct is as old as Eden:

Shame merely drives them to hide from God and to make excuses to Him. And so with ourselves: as long as the shame of sin continues, we try to hide it, to get away from it, but it only drives us farther and farther from God. It is not a conscience taught by God, because we are more concerned about the shame before men than the sinfulness before God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The pledge stays in her hands

The goat was never delivered, so the pledge stays in Tamar's hands. Later she produces it:

Judah's pretended virtue is about to be exposed by what happens next... He has a double standard, which is not acceptable to a holy God. Judah is ready to condemn Tamar to be burned, but she had secured a pledge from him. She now brought this forward as evidence (v. 25), and Judah's part in the sin was made plain to everyone. This is the way God works. An honest confession will secure His mercy.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Grace running through the guilty line

Judah is at his worst here. Yet that is not where the story ends:

It was not Reuben or any other of the tribal heads, but Judah, who proposed the sale of Joseph. Now he showed in his own household the evil that drew down curse upon curse. In the end the head of that house had to admit the sad shame of Tamar. She was more righteous than he was, and he had sentenced her to die by fire. Yet through this guilty Judah, and through Tamar, came the One who cleanses from all sin by His blood. He will reign over the universe to God's glory.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Departure. The failed errand is fruit, not root. Judah "went down from" his brothers, and a man reaps what he sows.

- Concealment. Judah's aim is a quiet settlement — goat delivered, pledge returned, no trace left.

- Denial. The townsmen's "no one was here" closes the case before men, but conscience keeps a record God will read out.

- Exposure. The debt was never paid, so the pledge stayed with Tamar. It became the evidence that stripped away Judah's pretended virtue.

- Mercy. Honest confession is where God meets a guilty man. And from this very line came the One whose blood cleanses from all sin.

Genesis 38:23 · Darby

Then Judah said, Let her take [it] for herself, lest we be put to shame. Behold, I sent this kid, and thou hast not found her.

Judah has left three personal items as a pledge with a woman he took for a prostitute, and the friend sent to redeem them cannot find her. He drops the search rather than be laughed at, which raises the question of the verse: is Judah troubled by the sin, or only by the shame?

Shame Before Men, Not Sin Before God

Judah's worry is that people will laugh. What he does not say is that he has done wrong. Commentators separate these two reactions, and trace the difference back to the first people in the Bible who hid:

Shame only drives Adam and Eve to hide from God and to make excuses to Him. It is the same with us. As long as the shame of sin lasts, we try to hide it and escape it. But it only drives us farther and farther from God. That is not a conscience taught by God, because we care more about the shame in front of people than about the sinfulness before God... our sense of the guilt of sin should always be deeper than our sense of its shame.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Pledge He Cannot Buy Back

The young goat was meant to buy back the signet, the cord and the staff. Judah would rather lose them than be laughed at. But the pledge he abandons is the very thing that will convict him:

Judah's pretended virtue is about to be exposed by the subsequent events... Judah is ready to condemn Tamar to be burnt, but she had secured a pledge from him. This she now brought forward in evidence (v. 25) and Judah's complicity in the sin is manifested before all. This is the way God works. A frank confession will secure His mercy.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Secrecy Is No Protection

Judah counts on the matter staying between himself, his friend, and a woman nobody can locate. Writers on secret sin note that those most sure of secrecy are the ones God exposes:

God knows your most secret sin: "You have set our iniquities before you, our secret sins in the light of your presence" (Psalm 90:8)... You have an informer in your own heart — your conscience. It goes along with you and witnesses every plot you lay. What it sees, it writes down, for it is a court of record... Look into the word. You will find that God has usually shamed in this world the very people who counted most on secrecy in their sinning.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Friend Who Runs the Errand

The man sent with the goat is Hirah of Adullam, the friend Judah made after leaving his brothers. Needing a friend to cover his tracks fits the road the chapter opened with:

The actual words of Scripture, "went down from," show the path of departure he had set out on. They warn the reader that sin will mark what follows... The heart astray from God is a ready prey to the deceit and incitements of men. Someone not walking in communion with God will soon walk in fellowship with unconverted people of the world.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Why Such a Story Is in the Bible

The chapter cuts away from the story of Joseph. Commentators see the placing as deliberate, and they point out where Tamar's name later appears:

It seems we have the sad story of Judah told here to heighten in our minds the way Joseph stood firm under a temptation of the same kind... the Tamar of this chapter is the first of the women mentioned in the genealogy of our Lord, recounted in Matthew 1. Of the four women mentioned, only Ruth had a clean record from the moral point of view, and she came from a nation under a curse. Such names would never have appeared in the record had it not been for the grace of God — the grace that triumphs over human sin.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Grace Larger Than the Disgrace

Judah is hushing up a sordid night. Through it God is carrying forward the line of the Messiah:

How shocking that she claimed her right in such a shameless and incestuous way! How self-righteous Judah was, ready to burn the mother of babies who were his own without his knowing it! And one of those babies is carefully marked out in Messiah's direct line. Such is man, and such Judah; but such too is God. Where heinous sin abounded, grace much more exceeded.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Departure. "Went down from" set the chapter's direction. A heart far from God soon keeps company that suits it.

- Concealment. Judah fears ridicule, not guilt. That is a conscience measuring itself by people, not by God.

- Exposure. The pledge he lets go becomes the evidence against him. Those who count most on secrecy are the ones God shames.

- Confession. The way out is the one Judah avoids here — an honest admission, which secures God's mercy.

- Grace. Into this very history God writes the family line of Christ. Where sin abounded, grace abounded much more.

Genesis 38:24 · Darby

And it came to pass about three months after, that it was told Judah, saying, Tamar thy daughter-in-law has committed fornication, and behold, she is also with child by fornication. And Judah said, Bring her forth, that she may be burned.

Judah hears that his widowed daughter-in-law is pregnant. His answer comes in one breath: bring her out and burn her. Three months earlier he had committed the same sin with the same woman. Commentators use this verse to show how harsh a man can be about a sin he shares.

A sentence passed on his own sin

Judah's judgment is instant, and it falls on one person only. One writer points out how selective the verdict is:

Tamar's plan worked as she had wanted. Three months later, someone told Judah that she was pregnant through prostitution (v. 24). He had no hesitation in condemning her, and passed sentence that she should be burned to death. Clearly he never even thought about the man involved in the case. Judah could sin and no one asked a question. Yet for the very same sin he thought Tamar must die!

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The man who caused the fall

Judah sits here as the judge. One writer weighs his guilt against Tamar's:

What a hypocrite! Judah acts as if he is completely right and without blame, but it is he who has the greater guilt. It was he who caused Tamar to stumble, and now he wants her punished. If I cause another to sin because of my own wickedness, how great then is my responsibility. Judah is the one who started these sins, and now he places all the blame on Tamar… He has a double standard, and a holy God does not accept it. Judah is ready to condemn Tamar to be burned, but she had taken a pledge from him. She now brings it forward as evidence (v. 25), and Judah's part in the sin is shown to everyone. This is how God works. An honest confession secures His mercy.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

The same scene played twice

Another writer sets Judah beside King David. David also passed a death sentence on a sin he had committed himself:

When Judah heard about Tamar's condition, he said, "Bring her out, and let her be burned." He was quick to pass the harshest sentence on a sin he had shared in himself. So it was with David! Nathan the prophet told the king his story. David's anger blazed against the man in it. He said to Nathan that as the Lord lives, the man who had done this thing must surely die.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Why the judge cannot see himself

This is not a one-off failure in an ancient family; it is what happens to anyone who takes up the judge's seat:

Judging our brother is a very deep-seated tendency in our heart. The Lord forbids it. If we do it anyway, two penalties are sure to follow, as He shows here. First, we ourselves shall come under judgment, and have measured out to us just what we have measured to others. Second, we shall drift into hypocrisy. As soon as we start judging others we become blind to our own defects… The most profitable form of judgment for each of us is self-judgment.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Tamar's part in the sin

Later Judah admits she was more righteous than he was. That is a comparison, not a verdict of innocence:

Tamar's plan to trap Judah did not come from faith in God. That is true even if she valued a place in the family where the true God was known. On a human level, Tamar's act was more righteous than Judah's, as he confessed. But morally they were the same: partners in a grievous sin. Conduct like this might suit the Canaanite families, but it was hateful to the holy God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. It may be hard for us to judge Tamar's true worth. Her desire for children was a right one, but her actions to reach her goal cannot be excused.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The line that runs through the wreckage

Judah is at his worst here. Yet one writer looks at where this family line leads:

It was not Reuben or any other of the tribal heads, but Judah who proposed the sale of Joseph. In his own house he then showed the evil that drew down curse upon curse. In the end the head of that house had to admit the sad shame of Tamar. She was more righteous than he was, and he had sentenced her to die by fire. Yet through this guilty Judah, and through Tamar, came He who cleanses from all sin by His blood. He will reign over the universe to God's glory.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sentence. Judah condemns Tamar to burning for a sin he committed himself. He never once thinks of the man involved. God does not accept that double standard.

- Cause. He is not just as guilty as Tamar. He is the one who caused her to stumble, so the greater responsibility is his.

- Blindness. The moment we take the judge's seat we lose sight of our own faults; the only safe judgment is self-judgment.

- Exposure. Tamar produces the pledge she had taken, and the accuser becomes the accused. Judah's own part in the sin comes out in front of everyone. Honest confession is what secures God's mercy.

- Grace. From this guilty man and this guilty woman came the One whose blood cleanses from all sin. He will reign over the universe to God's glory.

Genesis 38:25 · Darby

When she was brought forth, she sent to her father-in-law, saying, By the man to whom these [belong] am I with child; and she said, Acknowledge, I pray thee, whose are this signet, and this lace, and this staff.

Judah has sentenced Tamar to death by fire. As they lead her out, she sends him three objects and asks him to name their owner: the judge now holds proof of his own guilt.

The three items she kept

Commentators explain what the word translated "cord" means here:

In Genesis 38:18, 25 the Hebrew word means "cord," and it was probably the cord by which the signet was hung.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Tamar had asked for these at the moment of the transaction, knowing what a day like this might require.

When he promised to send her a young goat as payment for his fornication, she demanded some security, and he gave her three things that were unmistakably his property (v. 18). From this one occasion she conceived a child.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

A judge caught by his own pledge

Judah had passed sentence in the previous verse without a moment's hesitation, and without asking who the other party was.

He had no hesitation in condemning her, and passed sentence that she should be burned to death. Evidently he never even thought of the man who was involved in the case. Judah could sin without any question being raised, but he considered that for the very same sin Tamar must be killed!

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Judah's own pledge now comes back as evidence against him.

What a hypocrite! Judah acts as if he is completely right and without blame, but it is he who has the greater guilt. It was he who caused Tamar to stumble and now he wants her punished… God's Spirit will say, as to his great heir David, "You are the man" (2 Sam. 12:7). He has a double standard, which is not acceptable to a holy God. Judah is ready to condemn Tamar to be burned, but she had secured a pledge from him. She now brought it forward in evidence (v. 25), and it showed Judah's part in the sin before all. This is the way God works. A frank confession will secure His mercy.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

What "more righteous than I" does not mean

Judah's admission in the next verse has been used to explain a New Testament phrase, and the comparison sets its limits. Writing on the tax collector who went home justified, one writer draws the line carefully:

The sense here is not absolute but comparative justification, just as in Judah's expression in the Greek version of Genesis 38:26: "Tamar is justified rather than I" (that is, more righteous).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how much credit Judah's words deserve. One reads them as the first sign of a real change: "when Judah exclaimed, 'She is more righteous than I,' it was the evidence of a divine work in his soul" (An Outline of Sound Words). Another is blunter — "he was more guilty than Tamar, for righteousness was not involved in the matter at all" (L. M. Grant).

Measured back to the man who measured it out

Now Judah is the one asked to examine and identify. One commentator sees a pattern in these chapters, writing of Jacob's own deception: "As he measured out, so it was measured to him again. God's government of His people works with great precision" (F. B. Hole). Judah's turn had come:

It was not Reuben or any other of the tribal heads, but Judah, who proposed the sale of Joseph. Now he showed in his own house the evil that drew down curse upon curse. In the end its head had to own the sad shame of Tamar, more righteous than himself — the woman he had sentenced to die by fire.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why this ugly scene is in the Bible

The chapter is not preserved to shame Judah but because the family line to Christ runs straight through it.

Here divine grace triumphs gloriously over man's sin. "It is evident that our Lord was descended from Judah" (Heb. 7:14). But how? "Judah was the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar" (Matt. 1:3)… The Spirit of God is leading us along the line through which, as to the flesh, Christ came, and in doing so He gives us, as links in the genealogical chain, Tamar and Bathsheba! How clear it is that there is nothing of man in this!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Pledge. The cord, signet and staff were Judah's own property. Tamar took them as security and kept them for this moment.

- Exposure. Judah sentenced Tamar without asking who the man was. Her pledge answered that question in public.

- Confession. Judah hears what David later heard: "You are the man." Commentators note that a frank confession secures God's mercy.

- Comparison. "More righteous than I" is comparison, not the justification taught in Romans. Writers differ on what it shows: a real work in Judah's soul, or only his greater guilt.

- Grace. The man who proposed selling Joseph and sentenced Tamar becomes a link in the family line of Christ. Nothing of man is in that chain.

Genesis 38:26 · Darby

And Judah acknowledged [them], and said, She is more righteous than I, because I have not given her to Shelah my son. And he knew her again no more.

Genesis 38 pauses the story of Joseph to record a shameful episode in Judah's family. The turning point comes when Judah, who had just ordered Tamar burned, gets back the pledge he had given her. He admits the guilt is his, and he names his own failure: he never gave her to his son Shelah. From that same family came the line that leads to Christ.

What "more righteous than I" means

Does Judah's sentence mean Tamar stood right before God? One writer answers from the Septuagint, the old Greek translation of the Old Testament.

The sense here is not absolute justification but comparative justification. It is like Judah's words in the Septuagint version of Genesis 38:26: "Tamar is justified rather than I" — that is, more righteous.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Commentators differ over how much credit Judah's words deserve. Another writer thinks the comparison misses the real point.

Judah at least gave her credit for being more righteous than he was (v. 26). But he was in fact more guilty than Tamar, and righteousness was not involved in the matter at all.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The double standard exposed

Judah was ready to burn Tamar for a sin he shared. The pledge she produced ended the pretence.

Judah acts as if he is right and without blame. But he is the one with the greater guilt. It was he who caused Tamar to stumble and now he wants her punished... Judah was the prime mover in these sins and now he places all the blame on Tamar... He has a double standard, which is not acceptable to a holy God.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

The same pattern in David

The same thing happened later in David. One writer sets the two men side by side.

When Judah was told of Tamar's condition, he said, "Bring her out, and let her be burned." He was quick to pronounce the most severe sentence against a sin he had taken part in himself. So it was with David! When Nathan the prophet told him his parable, David burned with anger against the man in the story, and he swore to Nathan that the man who had done this must die.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Confession as the sign of a changed heart

Judah does not argue, shift the blame, or bury the evidence. The verse adds that he never went near Tamar again. One writer sees more than shame in that confession.

When Judah exclaimed, "She is more righteous than I," we cannot doubt it was the evidence of a divine work in his soul. The precious fruit of that work came out later in his words to his father and to Joseph.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Another writer draws out what God does with such an admission.

This is the way God works. A frank confession will secure His mercy... Having established righteousness, He is now free to show mercy.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Grace running through the wreckage

Judah's own house bred the evil that shamed him. One writer traces what God still brought out of it.

It was not Reuben or any other of the tribal heads, but Judah, who proposed the sale of Joseph. Now his own house showed the evil which drew down curse on curse. In the end its head had to own the sad shame of Tamar — more righteous than himself, though he had sentenced her to die by fire. Yet by this guilty Judah, and by Tamar, came He who cleanses from all sin by His blood.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Her name is written into the family record of Jesus. One writer explains why God put it there.

The history of Tamar shows us in God's own marvellous way how Christ comes into connection with Judah, and so her name appears in the Lord's genealogy in the gospel of Matthew... It is Tamar's sin that is insisted on... Tamar's sin alone brought her into the Lord's genealogy, and God has taken pains to record it, and to record it twice. In the same way, simply as sinners, we have a title to rejoice in a work done for the need of sinners. Judah shall find in a coming day his title, not in legal righteousness, nor in descent from Abraham, but in what God has emphasized for us here.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Compared. Judah's words weigh him against Tamar. They do not say that either of them stood righteous before God.

- Exposed. He was the prime mover in the sin, yet he demanded the harshest sentence on the woman he had wronged. A holy God will not accept that double standard.

- Repeated. David did the same when Nathan told his parable. He condemned in another man the sin he had committed himself.

- Owned. Judah hid nothing and blamed no one. Writers read that confession as the first evidence of God's work in him. It bore fruit in how he later spoke to his father and to Joseph.

- Redeemed. From this guilty man and this shamed woman came the line of Christ. Tamar's name stands in Matthew 1 not for her goodness, but as proof that salvation is for sinners.

Genesis 38:27 · Darby

And it came to pass at the time of her delivery, that behold, twins were in her womb.

Genesis 38 breaks off the story of Joseph to tell the shameful story of Judah. It ends at a birth. Two children lie in Tamar's womb, and no one could defend the union that made them. So why did God let the line that leads to Christ pass through this door?

Why the chapter stands here

The chapter cuts into Joseph's life like an intrusion. One writer explains why it stands here:

Genesis 38 completely interrupts the story of Joseph. In Genesis 39 the story starts again... It seems that we have the shameful story of Judah told to sharpen our sense of how Joseph stood firm under a temptation of the same kind... The Tamar of this chapter is the first of the women named in the genealogy of our Lord in Matthew 1. Of those four women, only Ruth had a clean record morally, and she came from an accursed race. Such names would never have appeared in the record if it were not for the grace of God — the grace that triumphs over human sin.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What lies in the womb

At this birth the future of a nation lies hidden inside a scandal. One writer pictures it as a vineyard about to be cut down:

Even here grace secures a pledge. Pharez is a second supplanter, one who takes another's place. The hope of Israel is in the womb, and a blessing is in the cluster. Yet it is the cluster of a wild vine, fit to be doomed to the sickle, if sovereign, abounding grace did not say, "Do not destroy it." Isa. 65:8; Matt. 1:3.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The names of the twins

The twins are Pharez and Zerah. One name speaks of breaking through, the other of the sunrise, and scarlet marks the scene. One writer sees here a hint of royal rights in the least likely place:

The colour "scarlet" stands for the rights of the Lord to rule. It is both remarkable and instructive to see how the thought of Christ's supremacy runs through Scripture like a "thread of scarlet." This beautiful thought first appears in what may be one of the darkest chapters in the Old Testament, Genesis 38. In dark, sordid circumstances something shows itself that has power to "break through" and to "rise up" — as the names of the twins suggest. This leads at last to the line from which David comes.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

Both names bear fruit later in Israel's history, each in its own way:

Pharez, the "breaker forth," breaks out into fruit beyond counting, which fills all the later history of Judah. From him come her kings, and her great King. His twin is Zerah, whose name means the sunrise, and from him come singers later on, such as Ethan, and warriors, such as Shammah, Sibbechai and Maharai, strong defenders of the throne.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The one who seemed first is not first

The delivery itself repeats a pattern the book of Genesis has already used more than once:

Tamar gave birth to twins. One began to come first, but the other took his place (vv. 27-29). This is another lesson of the first being last and the last first, as with Esau and Jacob, and many others.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The midwife cried out in surprise. One writer sees in the child who pushes past his brother a picture of Christ:

The closing verses (vv. 27-30) of this chapter show how mercy rejoices over judgment... The midwife had seen nothing like this before and exclaims, "What a breach you have made for yourself!" (v. 29 — older translations read, "How have you broken forth?"). But in this way the line to Christ moves forward. Pharez comes out, the second Jacob, one who takes another's place. From him would come the True Inheritor of every blessing. Christ is the righteous One who takes the place of every usurper. He will prevail, and His kingdom will stand for ever.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Grace that takes sinners as they are

Tamar's name reaches Matthew's list not in spite of her sin but through it. One writer reads the four women there as a short statement of the gospel:

It is Tamar's sin that brings her in, and Rahab's faith that brings her in. For Ruth to come in, the law's sentence against the Moabites had to be set aside. And Bathsheba — named even as the wife of Uriah — shows us grace triumphing over even a believer's sin. Salvation for sinners, through faith, apart from law, and eternal: this is what the simple placing of these names declares.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

One writer sets the guilty father beside his greatest descendant:

Yet through this guilty Judah, and through Tamar, came the One who cleanses from all sin by His blood. He will reign over the whole universe to God's glory. That reign goes far beyond all that Joseph pictured, just as He Himself went far lower in humiliation and suffering.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Interruption. Judah's story cuts into Joseph's on purpose. His failure makes Joseph's stand under the same temptation shine.

- Hope. Grace spares what looks like a wild vine fit for the sickle, because the hope of Israel lies in that womb.

- Breaking. The twins' names speak of breaking through and rising up. Even in the darkest chapter, the scarlet thread of royal rights shows.

- Reversal. The one who seemed first is not first. Through Pharez the line runs on to David, and then to Christ, the true heir of every blessing.

- Grace. Tamar's sin is the very thing that puts her name in the Lord's family line. Salvation is for sinners, through faith, apart from law.

Genesis 38:28 · Darby

And it came to pass when she brought forth, that one stretched out [his] hand, and the midwife took it and bound round his hand a scarlet thread, saying, This came out first.

Tamar's twins are born at the close of a shameful chapter in Judah's family. A hand comes out first, the midwife ties a scarlet thread on it — and the birth then overturns what that mark seemed to settle.

The colour scarlet

The colour of the thread matters. One writer follows scarlet right through Scripture, and shows where the trail starts and where it leads.

The colour "scarlet" stands for the rights of the Lord. It is both striking and instructive to see how the thought of Christ's supremacy runs through Scripture like a "thread of scarlet." This beautiful thought comes in at one of the darkest chapters in the Old Testament, Genesis 38. In dark, sordid circumstances something appears with power to "break through" and "rise up" (as the names of the twins suggest), and it reaches its high point in the family line that David comes from (Ruth 4:18-22).

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

The hand that was drawn back

The child who reached out first was not the child born first. One writer sets this beside a reversal that happens again and again.

Tamar gave birth to twins. One began to come out first, but the other took his place (vv. 27-29). This is another lesson of the first being last and the last first, as in the case of Esau and Jacob, and many others.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The reversal is not an accident. Another writer explains what the firstborn stands for, and why God keeps setting him aside.

God gave special rights to the firstborn son of each family (a double inheritance). Again and again we meet firstborn sons who fail, and their blessing goes to another who has no claim to it. Cain was the firstborn, but Seth took his place. So it was with Ishmael and Isaac, Esau and Jacob, Reuben and Joseph, and others. The underlying principle is clear: the firstborn speaks of man in his natural strength: 'for he is the firstfruits of his vigour' (Deut. 21:17). And this is the point: natural man acting in his own strength always leads to failure. For blessing to come at all, God has to provide the 'second'. Hebrews 10 states the principle plainly: 'He takes away the first that he may establish the second' (v. 9).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

What the two names carried

Both twins matter. Their names describe what each line became in Judah's later history.

Shelah is fruitful, but Tamar's children far more so. From them Pharez, the "breaker forth," breaks out into a vast fruit that fills the whole later history of Judah. From him come her kings, and her great King. Twin with Pharez comes Zerah, whose name means the [sun] rise, and from him come singers later on, such as Ethan, and warriors such as Shammah, Sibbechai and Maharai, strong defenders of the throne.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Mercy at the darkest moment

The chapter ends in shame. Yet one writer finds mercy in these closing verses, and a line kept alive.

The closing verses (vv. 27-30) of this chapter show how mercy triumphs over judgment. J. G. Bellett wrote of this, "The hope of Israel is in the womb, a blessing is in the cluster. Yet it is truly such a cluster of wild vine as might well be doomed to the sickle, if sovereign, abounding grace did not say, 'Destroy it not' (Isa. 65:8; Matt. 1:3)." The midwife had never seen anything like this, and she cries out, "How have you broken forth?" (v. 29). But in this way the line to Christ is carried on. Pharez comes out, the second Jacob, one who takes another's place. From him would come the True Inheritor of every blessing.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Where the line leads

Judah had sentenced Tamar to death, then had to admit she was more in the right than he was. That is the pair God used.

This chapter needs few words to prove how low Judah had sunk… And notice that it was not Reuben or any other head of a tribe, but Judah who proposed selling Joseph. He then showed in his own house the evil that drew down curse after curse, until he himself, the head of that house, had to admit the sad shame of Tamar. She was more righteous than he was, though he had sentenced her to die by fire. Yet through this guilty Judah, and through Tamar, came the One who cleanses from all sin by His blood and who will reign over the universe to God's glory.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Thread — A scarlet thread marks the first hand. Writers follow that colour through Scripture as the sign of Christ's right to rule.

- Hand — The child marked as first was not born first. Blessing does not follow birth order.

- Principle — The firstborn stands for man's own strength. That strength fails, so God sets the first aside and establishes the second.

- Names — Pharez means breaking through; Zerah means rising. One line gives Judah her kings, the other her singers and defenders of the throne.

- King — From this guilty pair comes the One who cleanses from all sin by His blood. He will reign to God's glory.

Genesis 38:29 · Darby

And it came to pass as he drew back his hand, that behold, his brother came out; and she said, How hast thou broken forth! on thee be the breach! And they called his name Pherez.

Genesis 38 tells one of the darkest family stories in the Bible. It ends with a birth: the twin who should have come second pushes out first. The midwife names him Perez — a breach, a breaking out. That name carries the line of promise all the way to Christ.

From ruin to the genealogy of grace

By the time these twins arrive, everything in Judah's household has gone wrong. Yet here the family tree of the Messiah continues.

In Judah's history we find the utter wandering and misery of Judah, but in it and out of it comes the genealogy of grace. He marries Canaanite women. Sin is in his family. He commits sexual sin with his own daughter-in-law. Everything had gone wrong. Yet from this sprang the One in whom men would bless themselves. They would say, "May the Lord make your house like the house of Perez, whom Tamar bore to Judah," and "may you act worthily in Ephrathah and be renowned in Bethlehem." Yet of Perez himself it might be said, how have you broken out?

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The midwife's astonishment

Her words are a question, not a blessing. The ESV reads, "What a breach you have made for yourself!"; older translations render it, "How have you broken forth!"

The midwife had seen nothing like this before and exclaims, "How have you broken out?" (v. 29). But this is how the line to Christ moves forward… We wonder how any good could come out of such a disastrous series of events. But what is impossible with men is not impossible with God. He brings glory to His Name out of the darkest shame.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

What the name Perez produced

The breaking out did not stop at the birth.

Shelah is fruitful, but Tamar's children much more so. One of them is Perez, the "breaker forth." He breaks out into a large family that fills all the later history of Judah. From him come her kings, and her great King. His twin is Zerah, whose name means the sunrise. From Zerah come singers later on, such as Ethan, and warriors, such as Shammah, Sibbecai and Maharai — sturdy defenders of the throne.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A second Jacob

Judah has already confessed his sin earlier in the chapter. Jacob had taken his older brother's place; so does this child.

Judah is brought to know and confess his sin… and then mercy triumphs over judgment. Perez comes forth, and he is a second Jacob, the supplanter. Despite his elder brother's natural claim, he gets the birthright. The kingdom suffers violence at his hand, and he takes it by force. And from this Perez comes the true Inheritor of the blessing. He is the righteous Supplanter of every usurper. He will prevail, and His kingdom will stand for ever. (Matt. 1:3.)

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Why Matthew names Tamar

Matthew's genealogy names four women, and Tamar comes first. The reason is not that her record was better.

The story of Tamar shows us how, in God's marvellous way of grace, Christ comes into connection with Judah. So her name appears in the Lord's genealogy in the Gospel of Matthew. Hers is the first of those four women's names, and their presence there shows the grace that has stooped to take up men… It is Tamar's sin that brings her in, as it is Rahab's faith. For Ruth to come in, the law's sentence about the Moabites had to be set aside. And Bathsheba — named even as the wife of Uriah — shows us grace triumphing over even a believer's sin. A salvation for sinners, through faith, apart from law, and eternal: this is what the simple insertion of these names declares.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Perez as the pattern of blessing

Later, at Bethlehem, the townspeople bless Boaz by wishing his house to be like this man's house. The choice of pattern is startling once you know where he came from.

Is it not remarkable that the elders and the people should take the house of Perez as a pattern of blessing for the house of Boaz? Who was Perez? Let Genesis 38 answer… But it was through Perez, son of Tamar, that the promised blessing had to come. God led His line of promise through the base things of the world, and took up those whom man would spurn. This was to magnify His grace and exalt His name.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Breach. The midwife's question comes over a child born out of order. Something broke out where men expected only shame.

- Breaker. The name Perez means "breaker forth." Out of him break the kings of Judah and Judah's great King, and beside him stands his twin Zerah — "sunrise."

- Birthright. Like Jacob before him, the younger son takes the elder's place. He points on to the true Inheritor, whose kingdom stands for ever.

- Grace. Tamar's sin is the very thing that brings her into Christ's genealogy. That is salvation for sinners, through faith, apart from law.

- Pattern. The elders take Perez's house as their pattern of blessing for Boaz. God ran His promise through what men would despise, to magnify His grace and exalt His name.

Genesis 38:30 · Darby

And afterwards came out his brother, round whose hand was the scarlet thread; and they called his name Zerah.

Genesis 38 is a dark chapter about Judah, Tamar and the sin between them. Its last verse names the second of the twins, Zerah, and commentators read that name as the turn from shame to the line that leads to Christ.

The names of the twins

One writer ties the scarlet thread and the twins' names into one picture. It is Christ's right to rule, showing itself in the darkest of settings.

The colour "scarlet" stands for rights of lordship. It is both remarkable and instructive to see how the thought of Christ's supremacy runs through Scripture like a "thread of scarlet." This beautiful thought appears in what may be one of the darkest chapters in the Old Testament, Genesis 38. In dark and shameful circumstances, something with power to "break through" and to "rise up" (as the names of the twins suggest) is clearly at work. It leads on to a generation from which David springs.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

The rising in Zerah's name

Zerah's name points to a sunrise. The same writer hears that word again in a promise of light for a people in darkness.

In that beautiful passage, Isaiah 60:1-7, the same thought is in view. Sin, darkness and turning away from God have marked His people, and thick darkness covers them. But the Lord rises upon them, His glory shines out, and nations and kings come to acknowledge the "rising" (Zerah) that has broken through the darkness and shown His supremacy over all.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

Zerah did not inherit the elder's place

The midwife's thread was meant to settle which twin was the elder. It did not. Every later list in Scripture puts the other brother first.

Scripture always puts Perez, the son of Judah and Tamar, ahead of his twin brother Zarah, or Zerah, so he held the right of the firstborn. In David's reign the family of Perez held the highest rank in the tribe of Judah, and it appears to have stood out for its many children and its strength.

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

Zerah's line still bore fruit

Losing the royal line did not mean losing a place. One writer traces what each brother's name produced in Israel's later history — the kings from one, and men of song and courage from the other.

Perez, the "breaker forth," breaks out into abundant fruit, which fills all the later history of Judah. From him come Judah's kings, and her great King. Twin with Perez comes Zerah, the sunrise. From him came singers, such as Ethan, and warriors, such as Shammah, Sibbechai and Maharai — strong defenders of the throne.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why the second twin is even mentioned

Matthew's genealogy of Jesus names Zerah, though the descent does not run through him. One writer suggests the mention is deliberate — it keeps the circumstances of the birth in view rather than hiding them.

Of all the women who might have been named, these four were, in different ways, the apparent blots on the genealogy. Far from hiding what was shameful about them, the record brings in details one might have thought could be left out. It is as if it wants to draw our attention to what might otherwise have been less noticed. So it mentions Zerah's twin birth with Perez, though Zerah himself is not in the line of the genealogy, as if to recall the sin that brought them into being.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Grace running through a ruined family

Genesis 38 is full of human sin. One writer points to the genealogy of Jesus to show what God did with it.

Genesis 38 shows one of those remarkable cases where divine grace triumphs gloriously over man's sin. "It is evident that our Lord was descended from Judah" (Hebrews 7:14). But how? "Judah was the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar" (Matthew 1:3). This is especially striking. God, in His great grace, rises above the sin and folly of man to bring about His own purposes of love and mercy.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer names Judah's guilt plainly, and then names what came through him.

Yet through this guilty Judah, and through Tamar, came the One who cleanses from all sin by His blood. He will reign over the universe to God's glory.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Scarlet. The scarlet thread on Zerah's hand marks Christ's right to rule. His name marks a rising that breaks through the darkness.

- Reversal. The hand that came out first did not win the elder's place. Every later record puts Perez ahead of Zerah.

- Fruit. Zerah is not forgotten. From him came singers and warriors who defended the throne his brother's line would fill.

- Honesty. Zerah's name stands in Matthew's genealogy, though the line does not run through him. The record keeps the sin of that birth in plain view.

- Grace. Out of a ruined family God brought the One who cleanses from all sin. Grace won where nothing human deserved it.