Genesis 37:17–28

Genesis 37:17 · Darby

And the man said, They have removed from this; for I heard them say, Let us go to Dothan. And Joseph went after his brethren, and found them at Dothan.

Joseph reaches Shechem, but his brothers have moved on. Rather than turn back, he follows them to Dothan — a place whose name, commentators say, exposes what Israel had become.

Refusing an Easy Way Out

Not finding his brothers at Shechem gave Joseph a reason to go home with a clear conscience. One writer draws attention to what he did instead.

Joseph does not find his brothers when he comes to Shechem. They have left. Now is his chance to return to Hebron if his heart is not wholly in his mission. Here was a good excuse for turning back and giving up the task. But no; he has no thought of turning back, or of giving up the work his father gave him to do.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Another writer sees such hold-ups as a common test of the servant's heart.

Joseph took this path of service. He carried his father's message and stood for his father's interest. He came to Shechem, but found his brothers gone, and his mission stalled. Such checks often come to test how real we are — whether the Father's will is all we want. Joseph's heart was set on finishing the errand. Instead of going home when he could not find them, he waited at his post until he got news of them. Then he followed them to Dothan, unprepared for the murderous and spiteful welcome that awaited him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Distance He Covered

The journey was long, and the men at the end of it hated him.

Joseph was certainly not one to break from his brothers without cause. He followed them forty miles to be with them and serve them, but "they hated him without a cause." He was a picture, given in advance, of One whose deepest human sorrow was that "His own people did not receive Him." He was wounded in the house of His friends, and He said to those He had held close, "One of you will betray me."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What "Dothan" Suggests

Commentators differ on the meaning of the name. Some take it from a root meaning decrees or rulings, and see in it the place Israel had made for itself.

Dothan means "their decree." Just as Joseph found his brothers at Dothan, so the Lord Jesus found Israel in a place of their own decrees and traditions, rather than in the place of subjection to the law of God.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer draws a line between two kinds of law.

They were zealous law-keepers, and Dothan points to this exactly, if I am not mistaken. The name means "laws" — not "precepts," the moral and spiritual guidance that God's law was, but imperial "decrees." Israel had gone away from God and from the path of their forefather. That is what God's word had become to them.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

A different reading takes the name from wells, and hears in it the complaint of Jeremiah.

"Dothan" means "two wells," or perhaps better, "cisterns." That at once recalls what God says of Israel in Jeremiah 2:13: "they have forsaken me, the fountain of living waters, and hewed out cisterns for themselves, broken cisterns that can hold no water." This was Israel's condition exactly when the One who held the fountain of life was among them.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The Thirst Behind the Name

The same writer follows the picture from Dothan to Christ's invitation.

Because of their self-righteousness and pride they would not be convinced by Him of their wickedness. So He appealed to their unsatisfied hearts and cried out, on the last day of the feast, the great day: "If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink." Joseph goes from Shechem, the scene of their wickedness, to Dothan — heart thirst. This is still Christ's way with souls. Some find it impossible to think of themselves as great and grievous sinners. But they do have empty hearts. When they see how broken earth's cisterns are, they will come to Him who is Himself the satisfying fountain of true joy.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The Search Foreshadowed

One writer looks past the brothers' cruelty to the One Joseph pictures.

They were heartless toward the innocent sufferer and toward the father who had sent him in love. Yet in the middle of it rises the foreshadowing of Him who was to come, one infinitely greater than Joseph. He too was the Beloved of His Father, and His Father sent Him as Son of Man to seek the lost.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent. Joseph does not go on his own. He carries his father's message to the very brothers who hate him.

- Checked. Shechem is empty. The delay tests him: is the father's will his own desire, or a job he can drop?

- Followed. He refuses the excuse to go home. He waits for news, then walks the forty miles to reach them.

- Found. Commentators differ on the name: their own decrees, or broken cisterns. Either way Dothan marks a people far from God — and thirsty hearts still find Christ the true fountain.

- Foreshadowed. The one loved by his father, sent in search of those who resent him, sketches the Son of Man sent in search of the lost.

Genesis 37:18 · Darby

And when they saw him from afar, and before he came near to them, they conspired against him to put him to death.

His father sent Joseph to check on his brothers. The plot against him is formed before he is close enough to speak. Commentators see here the pattern of a much larger story: love sent, love seen far off, love condemned before it can speak.

Condemned While Still Far Off

They decide the moment they see him, before Joseph can speak a word. One writer sets this distance beside another distance in the Bible: a father who ran to meet his returning son.

Joseph's touching story also points ahead to the reception the world has given to the One sent by the Father. Having no heart for their father, these men of evil ways have no eyes to recognise the one his love had sent. To them Joseph is only a dreamer whose dreams they would gladly stop by conspiring to kill him... And how eager man is to express his hatred: "They saw him from afar... they conspired against him to kill him." But God's thoughts are not our thoughts, nor His ways our ways. If it is a question of the Son of the Father's love coming near to men, then He will be rejected while still far off. But it is different when a sinner is drawn to the Father. Then we read that "while he was still a long way off, his father saw him and felt compassion, and ran and embraced him and kissed him."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Son Sent, The Heir Refused

One writer hears the brothers' words echoed in a parable Jesus told about a landowner's son. He then points to the answer God gave to that murder.

These words are a powerful reminder of the parable in Matthew 21: "Finally he sent his son to them, saying, 'They will respect my son.' But when the tenants saw the son, they said to themselves, 'This is the heir. Come, let us kill him and have his inheritance.' And they took him and threw him out of the vineyard and killed him." God sent His Son into the world with this thought: "They will respect my son." But man's heart had no respect for the "well beloved" of the Father. They cast Him out... Man crucified Him; but God raised Him from the dead. Man placed Him on a cross between two thieves; God set Him at His own right hand in the heavens.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Conspiracy, Not Impulse

To conspire is to plan in advance. That word separates this crime from a flash of temper. It shows what the human heart can do when it has time to think.

The evil heart of man is marked by corruption and violence. The brothers are ready to rid themselves of Joseph by violent acts. They were also prepared to cover their violence with corrupt and lying words. "Let us kill him," they say, "and we will say, Some fierce animal has devoured him." Violence and corruption are the outstanding marks of fallen man. He is shameless in both. He is not merely overcome by a sudden temptation. Like Joseph's brothers, he can plan his violent act and his corrupt lies in advance.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Plot That Served The Dreams

The conspiracy aimed to cancel Joseph's future. It became the road to it. One writer traces the hatred back to Cain, and finds mercy for the brothers in their own failure.

God sent Joseph's dreams, and the outcome proved them real, while what other people call reality is only a daydream. And what a mercy it was for his half-brothers, who were not brothers in heart! Their cruel purpose succeeded only in part. God turned it, in His goodness, wisdom, and power, into the very means of bringing about the exaltation they hated as much as they envied. Like Cain, their intent was to kill their brother. And why? Because, at bottom, their works were evil and their brother's righteous.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Mirror, Not Only A History

The verse reads like a charge against ten men long dead. One writer turns it on the reader instead.

The Jew did this nineteen hundred years ago. You and I, and every man, would do the same today, if grace had not renewed us and we stood in the same place.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent — Joseph comes as the one his father's love sent. Men with no heart for the father had no eyes for his son.

- Seen — They condemn him while he is still far off. In Jesus' story, the father runs to his returning son at that same distance.

- Planned — This was not sudden temptation. They arranged the violence in advance and had a lie ready to cover it.

- Foreshadowed — The scene matches the parable of the son sent to the vineyard. Man cast the Son out; God set Him at His own right hand.

- Overruled — The plot to cancel the dreams became the means of fulfilling them. Its failure was a mercy to the brothers who planned it.

Genesis 37:19 · Darby

And they said one to another, Behold, there comes that dreamer!

Joseph's brothers see him coming across the fields of Dothan, and they decide his fate before he is close enough to hear them. The way they name him shows what they could not forgive.

Sent on an errand of love

The errand was his father's. Neither father nor son measured the danger waiting at the end of it.

Joseph then starts on his mission. He is sure of his father's love. He knows his brothers hate him. And deep inside he carries an idea of future greatness that he does not yet understand. Responding to the will of the father, he did not shrink from the post of danger which the father did not foresee for him... instead of returning when he could not find them, he stays at his post until he gets news of them. He then follows them to Dothan. He was not ready for the murderous, spiteful welcome waiting for him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

"Master of dreams"

What they could not stand was not the dreaming itself.

They could not bear the idea of his exaltation. They hated him, and called him "this master of dreams" (v. 19), so they plotted his death. But Reuben rescued him, and says, "Shed no blood, but cast him into this pit."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Hatred that did not wait

Distance was no protection for Joseph. The same distance means something very different when a sinner turns back to God.

For them Joseph is only a dreamer whose dreams they would gladly frustrate by conspiring to kill him... And how eager man is to express his hatred. "When they saw him afar off … they conspired against him to slay him." But God's thoughts are not our thoughts, nor His ways our ways. If it is a question of the Son of the Father's love drawing near to men, then indeed He will be rejected while still far off. But what if it is a question of a sinner drawn to the Father? Then we read that while he was "still a long way off, his father saw him and felt compassion, and ran and embraced him and kissed him."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

"This is the heir"

The same reasoning turns up in a parable Jesus told.

These words strongly remind us of the parable in Matthew 21. "But last of all he sent to them his son, saying, They will respect my son. But when the tenants saw the son, they said to themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him and have his inheritance. And they took him and threw him out of the vineyard and killed him." God sent His Son into the world with this thought: "They will respect my son." But sadly, man's heart had no reverence for the "well beloved" of the Father. They cast Him out. Earth and heaven were at issue about Christ, and they are at issue still. Man crucified Him; but God raised Him from the dead.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The dreams they meant to bury

They meant to bury the dreams along with the dreamer.

They thought his dreams were only an idle fancy, which they could easily get rid of. They had to learn that the dreams were a revelation of the purpose of God, and they could not overthrow it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

That failure turned out to be the best thing that ever happened to them.

The dreams of Joseph were God-sent, and as real in the outcome as the realities of others are only daydreams. And what a mercy it was for his half-brothers, who were not brothers in heart! Their cruel purpose took effect only in part. God, in His goodness, wisdom, and power, turned it to bring about the very rise they hated as much as they envied.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"We shall see"

Their taunt challenged God's word. Events answered it then, and a larger answer is still coming.

Man imagines in vain that corruption and violence will prosper. The brothers of Joseph did the same. They had planned to kill their brother and meant to cover their act with lies, yet they could say with complete confidence, "We shall see what will become of his dreams." They will indeed see. And it is a terrible thing for those who reject Christ. They too will see, for it is written: "Behold, He is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see Him, even those who pierced Him, and all tribes of the earth will wail on account of Him."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent. Joseph came on his father's errand. He knew his brothers hated him, and he did not turn back when the first search failed.

- Scorned. They refused his name and called him "master of dreams". They could not bear the rise his dreams promised.

- Settled. They formed the plot while he was still far off. The same reasoning appears in the parable of the vineyard: "This is the heir; come, let us kill him."

- Stopped. The dreams they called fantasy were God's declared purpose. Their plan half failed, and it produced the very rise they wanted to stop.

- Seen. Their taunt, "We shall see what will become of his dreams," came true against them. It points to a day when every eye will see the One they rejected.

Genesis 37:20 · Darby

And now come and let us kill him, and cast him into one of the pits, and we will say, An evil beast has devoured him; and we will see what becomes of his dreams.

Joseph's brothers see him coming across the fields and settle the whole plan in a few sentences: a murder, a pit, and a lie for their father. Their taunt about the dreams turns out to be the one part of the plan God takes them up on.

A plot with two parts

The plan is not a sudden loss of temper. It has a murder in it and a cover story ready before the murder happens.

The evil heart of man is marked by corruption and violence. The brothers are ready to rid themselves of Joseph by violent acts. They are also ready to cover their violence with corrupt and lying words. "Let us kill him," they say, "and we will say that a fierce animal has devoured him." Violence and corruption are the outstanding marks of fallen man, and he is shameless in both. He is not simply overcome by some sudden temptation. Like Joseph's brothers, he can deliberately plan his violent act and his corrupt lies.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What they were really killing

The dreams are named in their taunt because the dreams are the offence. Joseph had been given his father's love, and then something more.

And so his sufferings begin. The Lord marks him out as the heir of glory. Joseph speaks of the goodness he had found, and of God's high purpose for him, and his brothers hate him. They envy him; and who can stand before envy? They had already begrudged him his father's favour, and now they hate him for God's. They hate him for his words and for his dreams. They are in the field together, as Cain and Abel had been long before. There they discuss whether to kill him, to throw him into a pit, or to sell him to strangers. And all this happened while he was serving them. He had come a long way to ask after their welfare ... and to carry them blessings from their father's house with their father's love. Such a moment was their opportunity.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The same words on other lips

One writer reads the scene as a picture of Christ. He sets the brothers' words beside words spoken in the Gospels.

He came into this world, which He had made along with everything in it, but what happened? He was hated. He was not wanted. So Joseph's brothers hated him... In the same way, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ sent His Son to be the Saviour of the world. When He came into the world men said, "This is the heir. Come, let us kill him, and the inheritance will be ours" (Mark 12:7). Joseph's brothers say, "Come now, let us kill him... and we will see what will become of his dreams." In other words, they plan to murder him, and then to back up their murder with deceit and lies. That was the proposal, but it was not carried out, because Reuben stepped in and Joseph was thrown into the pit. But with the Lord Jesus Christ the murder did take place. Men did kill Him.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The taunt granted

They meant "we will see" as mockery. The answer comes, and it reaches far past Joseph.

Man imagines in vain that corruption and violence will prosper. Joseph's brothers had planned to kill their brother, and they meant to cover the act with lying. Yet they can say with complete confidence, "We will see what will become of his dreams." They will indeed see. And it will go badly for those who reject Christ. They too will see. Is it not written, "Behold, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, even those who pierced him, and all tribes of the earth will wail on account of him"?

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The plan that built what it hated

Part of the plot succeeded: Joseph did go into the pit. That partial success is how the dreams came true.

God sent Joseph's dreams, and they proved as real in the event as other people's realities are mere daydreams. His half-brothers were not brothers at heart. What a mercy it was for them that their cruel purpose only took effect in part! God's goodness, wisdom and power turned it into the very elevation they hated as much as they envied. Like Cain, they intended to kill their brother. And why? Because, underneath it all, their works were evil and their brother's were righteous.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where the reader stands

One writer will not leave this story in the past, or with one nation.

The Jews did this nineteen hundred years ago. You and I, and every man, would do the same today if grace had not renewed us and we stood in similar circumstances.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Seeing, hated. The plot starts before Joseph arrives — envy of his father's favour and of God's purpose for him is enough.

- Seeing, planned. They plan the violence and the lie together, with the "wild animal" story ready before the killing.

- Seeing, repeated. The same reasoning returns in the Gospels: this is the heir, so kill him and take the inheritance. There the murder went through.

- Seeing, granted. Their "we will see" was a sneer; every eye will see the One they pierced.

- Seeing, ourselves. The heart that plotted at Dothan is not a foreign heart, and only grace makes the difference.

Genesis 37:21 · Darby

And Reuben heard [it], and delivered him out of their hand, and said, Let us not take his life.

Joseph's brothers have already agreed to kill him. Only the voice of the oldest brother stands in the way. His words stop the killing, but they do not stop the crime — and commentators read this half-rescue as both a mercy from God and a warning about good intentions that never turn into action.

A hand held back

The plot to kill Joseph was real. One writer explains why it failed.

Joseph was still some distance away when his brothers saw him coming. They plotted to put him to death (vv. 19-20). From the time the Lord Jesus was born, Herod was determined to kill Him (Matt. 2:13-16). But at this time God's sovereign protection was clear. Reuben, the oldest of the brothers, had some sense of responsibility for a younger brother, and he was able to persuade them not to kill him. In the same way, the Jews often tried to kill the Lord Jesus. But they could not do it until the time God Himself had set. In the meantime their fear of consequences restrained them (Matt. 21:45-46).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Reuben's private plan

Reuben's proposal of the pit was not the whole of what he meant to do. He had a second step in mind that he kept to himself.

Reuben suggested simply putting Joseph into a pit from which he could not escape, intending himself to afterward liberate Joseph so that he could return to his father (v. 22). He evidently felt that, being the oldest, he would be answerable to his father for what the brothers did, for evil does not generally continue long without being discovered.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Degrees of guilt, one shared hatred

The brothers did not all act with the same cruelty. Yet one writer refuses to split them into the guilty and the innocent.

There may be different measures in the common enmity; but in a great moral sense they are all one generation. Reuben was Jacob's firstborn. We may suppose that he felt more answerable to their aged father for the boy than any of them did. He saves Joseph from the sword, and Judah proposes a sale of him to the merchants, instead of the pit. In ways like these there are measures in the common enmity… here, all are the guilty brothers of Joseph.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The cost of standing in the middle

Reuben says the right thing, but he risks nothing by saying it. One writer asks why he did not speak out plainly instead.

Many are like Reuben — they try to occupy a neutral place. He seeks, in a timid, half-hearted way to save the life of Joseph. If he knew Joseph did not deserve such treatment, why did he not step out and say plainly, "No; lay no hand on this defenceless boy. Why do you want to kill the child? I shall stand by him; and if you kill him, you must do it over my dead body." "Well said, Reuben!" we would all exclaim. But no; he is too cowardly. He tries in a weak way to save Joseph's life, but he makes sure it costs him no risk. And he suffers along with his wicked brothers, just as if he had taken the leading part, like Judah.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Intentions that never arrive

Reuben's good intentions had a habit of collapsing. One writer sees the same pattern through his whole life.

Joseph was in danger from his brothers, and Reuben, as the eldest, should have protected him. He does go so far as to say, "Shed no blood" — people like him hate the thought of blood, especially in theology — "throw him into this pit." He meant to rescue him; but something always happens to upset a Reuben's good intentions. He means to be an upright man, no doubt, but falls into the terrible sin of which his father accuses him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why the rescue had to fail

So why did Reuben's plan never work? One writer points to Joseph's dreams.

His older brother Reuben comes to the rescue. He plans to get Joseph out of the pit they threw him into, and to send him back to his father. Joseph would have been glad to hear of Reuben's plan. But that kindness would have stopped Joseph's dreams from coming true, and so it failed.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

A greater than Joseph

One writer reads the whole scene — the failed defence, the pit, the sale — as a picture of Christ.

Joseph is sent to see the welfare of his brothers, follows them to Dothan, and there the last errand of love brings out their deepest hatred. They determine to get rid of him. They will have this dreamer no more. Reuben sets himself against their plan to murder him. But the result is that, at Judah's proposal, he is thrown into the pit and given up for death. Yet he is taken out of it and sold to the Midianites — a wonderful picture of One greater than Joseph.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Restraint. The brothers agreed on murder, but it never happened. Writers see God's hand protecting Joseph through an older brother's sense of duty.

- Half-measure. Reuben's mercy was real but timid; he tried to save Joseph at no cost to himself.

- Neutrality fails. He never stood openly with Joseph, so he shared the guilt as fully as the brother who sold him.

- Overruled. Even his secret plan to restore Joseph to their father collapsed, because it would have stopped Joseph's dreams from coming true.

- Shadow. The errand of love met the deepest hatred. The brother thrown into the pit and sold points to One greater than Joseph.

Genesis 37:22 · Darby

And Reuben said to them, Shed no blood cast him into this pit which is in the wilderness; but lay no hand upon him -- in order that he might deliver him out of their hand, to bring him to his father again.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Genesis 37:23 · Darby

And it came to pass when Joseph came to his brethren, that they stripped Joseph of his vest, the vest of many colours, which he had on;

Joseph reaches his brothers, and their first act is to tear off his robe — the gift his father made for him. Commentators read that act as raw family hatred, and also as a picture of what men would later do to Christ.

The garment itself

The verse names the robe twice. The word behind it covers an ordinary piece of clothing, and a dictionary of Bible words shows where else it appears:

The inner garment is the kethoneth, a long tunic worn by men and women. It was made of wool, cotton, or linen. This was the garment God made of skins for Adam and Eve, and what Jacob made of many colours for Joseph. Gen. 3:21; Gen. 37:3, 23-33. It formed part of the priest's dress... It was this garment of the Lord's that was woven in one piece, John 19:23.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Not every writer reads the robe as brightly coloured:

The name does not mean exactly "of many colors." Nor was it a seamless robe of one piece, the kind the Lord Himself usually wore. It is a "tunic of pieces," which suggests variety. I think it points to the many powers seen in the Lord in those mighty works which He called works "from the Father."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Undoing what the father had done

The father gave the robe. The stripping answers the father as much as the son:

His brothers stripped him of his coat of many colours and threw him into the pit. The father had marked him out with that coat; the brothers degrade him by tearing it off. It happens again and again with Christ. Some special display of divine power, wisdom and grace sets Him above all others, and at once man strips Him of His coat of many colours. Man tries to drag Him down to the level of an ordinary man by asking, "Is not this the carpenter's son?"... With Joseph the stripping was only the first step toward the pit. So with Christ: man rejected every witness to His glory, and at last, with wicked hands, delivered Him to death.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why the robe was the target

The hatred was not about cloth. It was about the favour the robe marked out:

Joseph here shows himself as the righteous or separated one, and so he stirs up the hatred of his wicked brothers. The light makes the deeds of darkness visible, and the darkness hates the light. In the same way the world later hated Joseph's Lord, because He testified that its deeds were evil. And the marks of divine favour placed on the righteous one only stir that hatred further... His brothers envy him. Later, out in the field together, they take counsel like another Cain, who killed his brother: shall they kill Joseph, throw him into the pit, or sell him to strangers?

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The same scene at the cross

One writer sees the same scene at the cross, down to the mood of the men who carried it out:

They likely took pleasure in stripping Joseph of his coat of many colors, because of their jealousy toward him over his father's favouritism. All of this reminds us of men taking the garments of the Lord Jesus and casting lots for them at the time of His crucifixion (Matt. 27:35). Joseph's brothers calmly sat down to eat. In the same way, Matthew says of those who crucified the Lord, "they sat down and kept watch over Him there" (Matt. 27:36).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

What the robe stood for is what His enemies set out to remove, and the story did not end there:

The many-coloured coat... was a mark of renown, of superior dignity or excellence... The persecutors of the Son of God were not satisfied until they had stripped Him, as far as they were able, of everything the many-coloured coat of Joseph stood for — His dignity, His moral excellence, His honour. They took everything they could lay their guilty hands on... Yes, they stripped Him. But like a sheep silent before her shearers, He did not open His mouth. He submitted without complaint to the mockery and humiliation, and because of this God has "highly exalted Him and bestowed on Him the name that is above every name."

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Evil that served a purpose

The crime is real, but it is not the last word:

Enough was done, and enough is written, to show that the Holy One of God stood before the eyes of the One who knows how to carry out His deliberate counsel and foreknowledge. God did this not only despite the unbelief of the Jews who had turned away from Him, and despite the hands of lawless Gentiles, but through them. In their blind pride they did not know what they were doing. Yet they knew more than enough to leave both without excuse.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Given. The father marked out his son with the robe, a sign of renown and dignity. Hatred aims first at what love gave.

- Stripped. What the father put on, the brothers tore off, trying to reduce the favoured one to nothing special.

- Repeated. Men did the same to Christ. They took His garments and stripped away His dignity and honour, then sat down to watch.

- Silent. He did not answer the stripping — He submitted like a sheep before the shearers.

- Exalted. The stripping came first, then the pit. But the pit was not the end: God has exalted Him and given Him the name above every name.

Genesis 37:24 · Darby

and they took him and cast him into the pit; now the pit was empty -- there was no water in it.

This is the lowest point of the story. Joseph's brothers seize him, strip off his coat, and drop him into a dry pit. Commentators see raw family cruelty here. They also see a picture of Christ drawn in advance — and they mark where the picture stops.

Stripping Comes Before the Pit

Joseph loses the coat before he loses his freedom. The robe was his father's mark of honour on him. The brothers tear it off first.

The father had distinguished him by a coat of many colours; the brothers degrade him by stripping him. So it is with Christ. On many notable occasions He stands out above all others by some special display of divine power, wisdom and grace. At once man strips Him of His coat of many colours. Man tries to drag Him down to the level of a mere man by asking, "Is not this the carpenter's son?" or "Is not this the carpenter?" As with Joseph, the stripping was only the lead-up to the pit; so with Christ, the rejection of every witness to His glory led men at last with wicked hands to hand Him over to death.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Pit Shows Us the Brothers

Abraham once carried his son Isaac up a mountain to sacrifice him. Joseph goes the other way — down. One writer reads meaning in the two directions.

Isaac goes up to the mountain to be offered up. Joseph goes down to the pit. The mountain speaks of the glory of the Person offered up. The pit tells of the misery and degradation of those for whom He is offered up… If his brothers are ever to enter blessing and share in Joseph's glory, then Joseph must take their place — the place of distance and shame that the pit sets out. "Without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins," and "unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies it remains alone."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

"No Water in It" — Where the Picture Stops

The dry pit is the exact line where Joseph stops resembling Christ.

Joseph may again take up the story of the cross as his brothers cast him into the pit. But for him "the pit was empty; there was no water in it." How different the cross of Christ! At God's word "Abraham stretched out his hand and took the knife to slay his son." That same God can now say, "Awake, O sword, against My shepherd, against the man who stands next to Me." Twelve legions of angels await His commands, yet He tells not one of them to hold back the sword of judgment. It is no empty pit into which He must go. He can say, "You have put me in the depths of the pit, in the regions dark and deep. Your wrath lies heavy upon me, and You overwhelm me with all Your waves" (Ps. 88:6-7).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

One writer marks two more differences: Joseph was not abandoned in the pit, and Joseph never chose it.

Cruel as the treatment by Joseph's brothers was, he was not forsaken. But Jesus cried out, "My God, my God, why have You forsaken me?"… The sufferings of Joseph were against his will; but the death of Jesus was His own voluntary offering. "I lay down my life for the sheep."

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Drawn Out to Be Handed Over

The dry pit could not kill Joseph. It could only hold him until his brothers found another way.

At Dothan, then, Joseph's brothers are found, and at once they plan to kill him. In fact they cast him into a pit, but one that holds no water. "It is not lawful for us," the Jews said to Pilate, "to put any man to death." Then they draw him out of it and sell him to the Ishmaelites for twenty pieces of silver. So Israel handed the Lord over to the Gentiles.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

From Pit to Throne

The pit is not the end of Joseph's road.

He was rejected and cast into the pit. He passed, in figure, through the deep waters of death, and so reached the place of dignity and glory. He was raised from the dungeon to rule over the land of Egypt, and to keep his brothers alive and provide for them… A striking picture of Him who hung upon the cross, lay in the grave, and is now on the throne of the majesty of heaven.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Pit Came Back to Them

The verse says nothing about Joseph pleading from the pit. Years later, his brothers say it themselves.

Joseph did not speak of it; no one in Egypt knew of it; but conscience spoke inside them. It had been quiet for a time, but it could not be silent for ever. It now woke, and each of them remembered the very look of anguish on his face: "We saw the distress of his soul, when he begged us and we did not listen." Memory does not die, though it may sleep for a while.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Stripped. The coat comes off before the man goes down — degrading the one the father honoured is the first step toward destroying him.

- Lowered. The pit displays not Joseph's glory but the brothers' corruption; to bless them, he must go down to where they are.

- Empty. No water meant Joseph lived. Christ's pit was not empty, and He chose to enter it.

- Drawn out. The dry pit only held him. His brothers pulled him up and sold him on — as Israel later handed the Lord to the Gentiles.

- Remembered. Joseph ends on a throne. His brothers end with an awakened conscience, recalling the pleading they refused to hear.

Genesis 37:25 · Darby

And they sat down to eat bread; and they lifted up their eyes and looked, and behold, a caravan of Ishmaelites came from Gilead; and their camels bore tragacanth, and balsam, and ladanum -- going to carry [it] down to Egypt.

The brothers throw Joseph into a pit, then sit down to a meal. While they eat, a trading caravan comes into view on the road to Egypt. Commentators see two things here: the human heart at its coldest, and God's hidden plan starting to move.

A meal beside the pit

They ate while their brother lay in the pit. One writer sets that meal beside another meal, eaten by men who had just handed over an innocent victim.

Having cast Joseph into the pit, his brothers "sat down to eat bread." Nor was it otherwise at the cross. The presence of Joseph only reveals the evil of his brothers. In the same way, the cross exposes how deep the corruption of man's heart goes. The leaders of Israel hand the true Passover Lamb over to death, and then calmly sit down to eat the Passover feast. They are an evil and adulterous generation, like the adulterous woman of Proverbs, of whom it is written, "she eats and wipes her mouth and says, 'I have done no wrong.'"

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Nothing spoiled their appetite, and nothing troubled their conscience — for the time being. Another writer says a quiet conscience is not the end of the matter. God alone can wake it.

None can teach like God. He alone can give the conscience the true sense of sin. He alone brings the soul down into the deep places of its own condition in His presence. Men run on in their life of guilt, taking notice of nothing, until the arrow of the Almighty pierces their conscience... Joseph's brothers had no idea of all that was to flow to them from what they did to him. "They took him and cast him into a pit … and they sat down to eat bread." "Woe to those … who drink wine in bowls and anoint themselves with the finest oils, but are not grieved over the ruin of Joseph." (Amos 6:6)

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The caravan and its cargo

The camels carried the ordinary trade goods of the region. Balm came from Gilead, and it stood for more than its price.

The gum of the balsam bush, of great medicinal value. Gilead was noted for producing it. It is used as a proverb to describe the healing God had for His people if they really turned to Him. Jer. 8:22; Jer. 46:11; Jer. 51:8. It was carried by the merchants into Egypt and elsewhere. Gen. 37:25; Ezek. 27:17.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

One writer pictures Joseph travelling to Egypt among those same spices.

Meanwhile Joseph had gone "wrapped" with the myrrh and spices of the Ishmaelites to Egypt. Was it his fragrance that attracted Potiphar to buy him?

Modernised from L. A. StasselOriginal wording

Hatred looking for a profit

The sight of the traders changed the plan. Murder became business.

The traders on their way to Egypt at once suggest to Judah a chance of making a profit out of their brother. Why not sell Joseph and make a little money? If they are not going to satisfy their hatred by killing Joseph, why not satisfy their greed by selling Joseph?... "Profit" is the word that governed the actions of Joseph's brothers. Judah asks the question of the greedy heart — not "Is it right?" or "Is it wrong?" but "What profit is it?"

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The shadow of a greater Sufferer

One writer sees more here than family cruelty. Out of the crime he sees a figure of Christ rise.

Yet in the middle of this heartlessness — toward the innocent sufferer, and toward the father who had sent him in love — a foreshadowing rises of Him who was to come. He is infinitely greater than Joseph. He too was the Beloved of His Father, and sent as Son of man in search of the lost. As the Faithful Witness, He drew out man's evil by divine good, and in everything He pleased God the Father.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The road they never meant to build

The caravan the brothers used to get rid of Joseph was the very transport God used to place him where He wanted him.

Notice what Joseph's trial did. God's ordering kept it from anything that would hinder it. It was meant to frustrate God's purpose, and it looked completely against it. Yet that trial, and his righteous suffering in Egypt, only brought about the very thing they seemed to frustrate. It was the Egypt his brothers sold him to, and the prison Potiphar put him in, that brought him to the butler and the baker. That is what made him governor over all the land of Egypt. We cannot put God out of His way. It is better to trust Him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- The meal. Men can eat calmly beside a brother they have just destroyed. The pit shows what is really in the heart.

- The silence. Their consciences said nothing that day — but God alone gives the true sense of sin, and He gave it to them years later.

- The profit. The passing caravan turned hatred into a transaction; Judah's question was not "Is it right?" but "What profit is it?"

- The picture. Joseph is the beloved son, sent by his father in love and rejected by his brothers. He points to One infinitely greater, sent to seek the lost.

- The road. The traders who carried Joseph away were carrying him toward the throne. The plan meant to defeat God's purpose is the plan that fulfilled it.

Genesis 37:26 · Darby

And Judah said to his brethren, What profit is it that we kill our brother and secrete his blood?

Joseph is in the pit. A caravan of traders comes into view, and Judah turns the moment into a business proposal.

The Question of a Covetous Heart

Judah does not call the murder wrong. He calls it unprofitable.

The company of merchants on their way to Egypt at once suggests to Judah the chance of making a profit out of his brother. Why not sell Joseph and make a little money? If they are not going to satisfy their hatred by killing Joseph, why not satisfy their covetousness by selling Joseph? So they gave their brother up to the Gentiles, and gave themselves up to money-making… "Profit" is the word that governed the actions of Joseph's brothers. Judah asks the question of the covetous heart — not "Is it right?" or "Is it wrong?" but "What profit is it?"

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A Conscience That Stops Halfway

Judah's plan looks merciful. It spares Joseph's life, appeals to blood ties, and spares them the trouble of hiding a body. But it draws one line and refuses the next.

A company of Ishmaelite traders appears, travelling towards Egypt. Judah is quick to see an ideal way to get rid of Joseph and make some money at the same time. So he points out to his brothers that killing Joseph and hiding it would gain them nothing. Selling him as a slave to the Ishmaelites would bring a profit — and leave them no dead body to get rid of. He also appeals to their sense of loyalty to their family relationship. Joseph was their brother. He seems to have a conscience against killing his brother, but no conscience against selling him as a slave!

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Different Degrees, One Guilt

Reuben saves Joseph from the sword; Judah proposes a sale instead of the pit. The differences are real, but they do not split the brothers into innocent and guilty.

There may be different degrees in the shared hatred; but in a deep moral sense they are all one generation. Reuben was Jacob's firstborn, and we may suppose he felt himself more answerable to the aged father for the boy than any of them. He saves Joseph from the sword, and Judah proposes selling him to the merchants instead of the pit. … The Judge of all the earth will surely do right. Sins will get their many stripes and their few stripes. But the world has cast out Jesus, and the world is the world. Here, all alike are the guilty brothers of Joseph.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The Shadow of a Greater Selling

Joseph's father sent him in love, and his brothers hand him over to strangers. One writer sees a greater Son behind that picture.

How evident that in Jehovah alone can one boast, and that the objects of His choice are in themselves nothing and worse than nothing! Yet heartlessness towards the guiltless sufferer, and towards the father who had sent him in love, is not all we see. In the middle of it rises a foreshadowing of Him who was to come, One infinitely greater than Joseph. He too was the Beloved of His Father, and sent as Son of Man in search of the lost.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer notes which brother made the proposal — and what God later brought out of his line.

We may notice that it was not Reuben or any other of the tribal heads who proposed the sale of Joseph. It was Judah. In his own house he later showed the evil that brought curse after curse. In the end he had to admit that Tamar, whom he had sentenced to die by fire, was more righteous than himself. Yet through this guilty Judah, and through Tamar, came He who cleanses from all sin by His blood. He will reign over the universe to God's glory, far beyond all that Joseph pictured, for He went far lower in humiliation and suffering.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From Hardness to Tenderness

Judah's story does not end with this bargain. Years later he speaks up about another younger brother.

He had taken the lead in selling Joseph to the Midianites going to Egypt, speaking with much hardness of heart. Now he has to speak about Benjamin, and what a change is clear! Instead of hardness, great tenderness of feeling, especially for his old father, Jacob. Then it did not matter how Jacob would feel: now it mattered everything to him. Here we see the working of a repentance not to be repented of.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Calculation — Judah does not ask whether the deed is right, only what it pays.

- Cover — Calling Joseph "our brother" and keeping their hands clean dressed a crime up as restraint.

- Company — Reuben holds back, Judah sells, the rest agree. The degrees differ; all share the guilt.

- Christ — A father sends his beloved son; the brothers hand him to strangers. Writers see the shadow of a greater rejection — and the Redeemer came through guilty Judah's line.

- Change — The hard man who sold one brother later pleads for another. Commentators call that repentance at work.

Genesis 37:27 · Darby

Come and let us sell him to the Ishmaelites; but let not our hand be upon him; for he is our brother, our flesh. And his brethren hearkened [to him].

Joseph is in the pit, his brothers are eating nearby, and a trading caravan appears on the road to Egypt. Judah's proposal sounds almost merciful: spare his life, keep our hands clean. Yet it ends with a boy sold for silver. What will a conscience allow when money is on the table?

The question a covetous heart asks

Killing Joseph would have satisfied their hatred. Selling him satisfies something else:

If they are not going to satisfy their hatred by killing Joseph, why not satisfy their greed by selling him? So they handed their brother over to the Gentiles, and handed themselves over to making money. "Profit" is the word that governed the actions of Joseph's brothers. Judah asks the question of the covetous heart — not "Is it right?" or "Is it wrong?" but "What profit is it?"

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A conscience with a line in the wrong place

Judah gives his brothers two reasons to sell rather than kill. One is money. The other is that Joseph is family:

A company of Ishmaelite traders appear, traveling toward Egypt. Judah is quick to see an ideal way of getting rid of Joseph and gaining some money at the same time… He also appeals to their sense of some loyalty to their family relationship. Joseph was their brother (v. 27). He seems to have a conscience against killing his brother, but no conscience against selling him as a slave!

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

"Our brother, our own flesh"

The words Judah uses are the Bible's set phrase for blood kinship, and Genesis uses it elsewhere too:

The same kindred: "you are my bone and my flesh," Gen. 29:14; "he is our brother, our own flesh." Gen. 37:27.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Different measures, one guilt

Reuben holds back from murder. Judah swaps the pit for a sale. The rest agree. One writer puts them all inside a single verdict:

There may be different measures in the common hatred, but in a great moral sense they are all one generation. Reuben saves Joseph from the sword, and Judah proposes selling him to the merchants instead of the pit… The Judge of all the earth will surely do right, and sins will get their many stripes and their few stripes. But the world has cast out Jesus, and the world is the world. Here, all are the guilty brothers of Joseph; and, as the outcome of their plans and their shared hatred, he is sold to the merchants.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Judah's silver and Judas's

Commentators read Joseph's life as a picture of Christ. Even the name of the man who proposes the sale points forward:

Judah sells him for a few pieces of silver, just as Judas sold the One he pictured — the same name, and a descendant of the same man. They kill him ("in a figure"). He passes to the Gentiles, where he is tempted, slandered, and numbered with wrongdoers.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What the brothers take for him measures him against the price of any slave:

Twenty pieces of silver is the price they get for him. This was just two-thirds the price of an average adult slave (see Ex. 21:32). Judas asked the chief priests what they would give for Jesus. Thirty pieces of silver is their offer… "Every man has his price" is a common saying of the world, and it is often untrue. But every soul that Satan cheats out of Jesus has its price. Some accept gold, others position or power. With some it is cheap pleasure, or lust, or some favourite secret sin.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The sale that carried God's purpose

The brothers chose the sale to be rid of Joseph. One writer traces where that road led — through prison and the two men he met there:

Notice how Joseph's trial… meant to frustrate God's purpose, and looking completely against it — and his righteous suffering in Egypt — only bring about the very thing they seemed to prevent. It was the Egypt his brothers sold him to, and the prison Potiphar put him in, that led him to the butler and baker, and made him governor over all the land of Egypt. We cannot put God out of His way. It is better to trust Him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Profit. Judah asks about gain, not about right and wrong. That is the question a covetous heart asks.

- Price. Twenty pieces of silver was below the price of an average slave. That was their brother's value to them.

- Pretence. The words "our brother, our own flesh" claim kinship in the same breath that sells him. This conscience refuses blood but accepts money.

- Picture. Judah sells Joseph for silver into foreign hands. Commentators see here Christ, sold by Judas and passed to the Gentiles.

- Purpose. The sale meant to defeat God's purpose became the road to Egypt and to rule. God's plan runs straight through man's worst bargain.

Genesis 37:28 · Darby

And Midianitish men, merchants, passed by; and they drew and lifted up Joseph out of the pit, and sold Joseph to the Ishmaelites for twenty silver-pieces; and they brought Joseph to Egypt.

Joseph's brothers turn their hatred into a business deal. They pull him out of the pit, hand him to a passing caravan, and take the silver. Behind this family crime sits a question the rest of Genesis answers: who was really directing the sale?

The price they set

Reuben had planned to save Joseph. The sale happened while he was away, and the price his brothers took is set here beside the law's own price for a slave.

Reuben's plan to save him from his brothers fails. True, they do not kill him. They strip him of his coat of many colours and throw him into a pit in the wilderness. And in Reuben's absence, it seems, they sell him to the Ishmaelites. Twenty pieces of silver is the price they get for him. This was just two-thirds the price of an average adult slave (see Ex. 21:32). Judas asked the chief priests what they would give for Jesus. Thirty pieces of silver is their offer. They valued Him at the price of a slave. Yet He was always God's delight. All angels adore Him, demons fear Him, and to the crowds of the redeemed He is the "all" and the "altogether lovely"... The sold and slighted Saviour may well watch it all and say, with what sounds like irony, "What a fine price they set on Me!" (Zech. 11:13).

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The question Judah asked

Judah's proposal in the previous verse shapes what happens here. Notice which question he does not ask.

The group of merchants on their way to Egypt at once gives Judah the idea of making a profit out of their brother. Why not sell Joseph and make a little money? If they will not feed their hatred by killing Joseph, why not feed their greed by selling him? So they gave their brother up to the Gentiles, and gave themselves up to making money... Judah asks the question for the covetous heart — not "Is it right?" or "Is it wrong?" but "What profit is it?"

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Handed over to outsiders

Commentators see the sale as a picture of a later betrayal. Even the dry pit carries meaning.

In fact they throw him into a pit that holds no water. ("It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death," the Jews said to Pilate.) Then they draw him out of it and sell him to the Ishmaelites for twenty pieces of silver. So Israel handed the Lord over to the Gentiles.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Where the picture stops

The picture is close, but it is not the same. The empty pit that spared Joseph marks the point where the comparison breaks down.

Like Isaac in this picture, Joseph did not die; there was no water in the pit. But our precious Jesus sank in the deep mire... Isaac lay on the altar and was spared. Joseph went into the pit and was spared. But when Jesus hung on the cross, God did not spare His own beloved Son. Joseph's brothers treated him cruelly, yet he was not forsaken. Jesus cried out, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?"... Joseph suffered against his will. Jesus offered up His own life freely.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

A crime inside a promise

The brothers thought they were getting rid of a problem. In fact they were moving their family toward the land God had told Abraham about long before.

The famine was the immediate reason they went down to Egypt. But through the famine, and through the wickedness of Jacob's sons in selling their brother to the Ishmaelites (Gen. 37:28), God was simply carrying out His own purposes. Long before this He had said to Abram, "Know for certain that your offspring will be sojourners in a land that is not theirs and will be servants there, and they will be afflicted for four hundred years. But I will bring judgment on the nation that they serve, and afterward they shall come out with great possessions."... So even human anger is harnessed to the chariot wheels of God's decrees.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The bill comes due

Twenty years later, in an Egyptian prison, the memory of this day comes back to them.

Conscience connects their present trouble with their past sin. The prison has so far done its work. They not only say, "We are guilty," but "We are guilty concerning our brother." We saw the anguish of his soul, but we hardened our hearts. He begged us, but we shut our ears to all his pleading. "That is why this distress has come upon us."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Price — Twenty pieces of silver was two-thirds the going rate for a slave. They sold a brother for less than a stranger was worth.

- Profit — Judah's question was not "Is it right?" but "What profit is it?" Selling Joseph fed their greed instead of their hate.

- Pattern — The brothers handed Joseph to outsiders for twenty pieces. Commentators see here a picture of Christ, handed to the Gentiles and sold for thirty.

- Limit — The pit had no water, and Joseph lived. God did not spare Christ, and Christ gave Himself freely. The picture points to Him, but it never reaches Him.

- Purpose — Their crime carried out what God had told Abraham: his family would serve in a foreign land, then come out rich. God harnessed their anger to His plan. Their guilt still found them twenty years later.