Genesis 36:31–33

Genesis 36:31 · Darby

And these are the kings that reigned in the land of Edom before there reigned a king over the children of Israel.

Genesis 36 pauses Jacob's story to list the descendants of his brother Esau. Verse 31 records an awkward fact: Edom had kings while the chosen family had none — and critics have used the line to date Genesis long after Moses.

The natural develops first

Where this record sits is part of the lesson. One writer sees a fixed order behind how fast Esau's family rose:

But there is another genealogy (Gen. 36), and strikingly introduced in this place. The Edomite interrupts the course of the line of God's dealings. We see at once what remarkable maturity there was here. It is always so — first that which is natural, afterwards that which is spiritual. Even then we find a rapid development of power in the family of Esau. They were all great people, to be sure — chief after chief, right to the end of the chapter. Even kings, we are told, reigned there before there were any in Israel. I have no doubt that this is given to us as an important element to mark how quickly what is not of God shoots up. Growth according to God is slower, but then it is more permanent.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A promise without a crown

God had pledged royalty to Jacob's line, not Esau's. Yet the brother without the promise got the crown first:

Edom had kings before Israel had any; that is all that is said. The point to be recorded is that Edom had them at a time when Israel still had none. Edom was a settled nation with regular rule before God's people Israel were. In the chapter before, God had promised that kings would come from Jacob. Yet the natural went first in apparent strength: God's people must wait His time.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The wording defends its own date

Critics say the verse looks back from the days when Israel had kings. Commentators answer that the wording points the other way, and that one small word settles it:

The passage in Genesis 36:31, which critics stress most, is surely from Moses… Israel had the promise of kings; Esau had not. Yet Esau had many kings, one after another, long before any sign of royalty appeared in the people who held that promise. If the passage had been written after Saul or David's line began to reign, the wording would have been different — not "any" or "a" king, but "the king" or "the kings."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Darby also puts a limit on how long that Edomite line ran:

The list of kings in Edom consists of eight. Now Phinehas was the seventh in descent from Jacob, and he was in full strength and activity in the time of Moses. So the kings of Edom named in Genesis very possibly did not extend beyond the time of Moses, though we are not given the data to fix when they began.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Thrones that never passed from father to son

How did each of these kings get his throne? One writer rules out a popular answer:

Since no son succeeded his father, some think the Edomite monarchy was elective. But this supposes the people had enough power to choose their own ruler — a democratic principle we have no ground to suppose existed in those early days. Violence and lust of power were there, and bore fruit. The ambitious, unscrupulous man will try to win over the crowds and ride them to power. That is a different thing from an elective monarchy. What we do see in Esau's descendants, and what has marked the world, is rival factions fighting for power, where of course the strongest arm wins. God lets the world show itself, and its power, or rather lack of power, first. Then come His purpose and its firm foundation. For there were kings in Edom before any were found in Israel. The Edomite kings are gone, but God's King remains for ever.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A test set beside the promise

For Israel, this contrast was more than history. It pressed on their trust:

It was no small moral test for the sons of Israel. God had given them His promises, yet Esau's descendants were long settled in peace as lords of their own soil. Jacob and his family, meanwhile, lived as strangers who were only tolerated, and were soon to be slaves — slaves for a long while — in the land of Ham… And the Bible holds, in the same books, both the promise and the trial that early appearances made for faith. It sets it all down calmly, as the word of One who sees the end from the beginning.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The king Israel was waiting for

Here the word "king" appears only as something Israel did not have. Its first positive use comes later, and points beyond David:

This is the first positive mention of a king in Israel, for in Genesis 36:31 the word is mentioned in a purely negative way. David was raised up as a king, a picture of Christ; but only when Christ Himself returns in glory will "the shout of a king" really be heard among them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- First, not lasting. What is not of God shoots up quickly; growth according to God is slower but more permanent.

- Promised, not yet given. God pledged kings to Jacob's line, never to Esau's. Yet Esau wore crowns first. God's people must wait His time.

- Written, not edited. The verse says "any king," not "the king," which points to a writer who knew no king in Israel at all.

- Seized, not inherited. No Edomite son succeeded his father; the strongest arm won, and every one of those thrones is gone.

- Tested, then answered. The same books hold both the promise and the trial. Edom's kings are gone; God's King remains, and Israel will yet hear the shout of a king.

Genesis 36:32 · Darby

And Bela the son of Beor reigned in Edom; and the name of his city was Dinhabah.

Genesis 36:32 names Edom's first king, Bela, and the city he ruled from. Esau's line has a crowned king while Israel has none, and that order is what the chapter is recording.

The first of eight

Bela's name opens a list the chapter follows to its end, before it turns back to chiefs.

This was not the height of their development. Scripture traces no fewer than eight kings in succession from Bela to Hadar, though it is careful to note that Esau's chiefs appear again (vv. 40-43).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Kings while Israel had none

Verse 31 sets Edom's kings against Israel's lack of them. One writer weighs the exact wording.

In Genesis 36:31 it is said, before there was any king in Israel. Edom had kings before Israel had any; that is all that is said. Edom's having any when Israel had had none was the point to be recorded. It was a settled nation, ruled in an orderly way, before God's people Israel were. The natural went first in apparent strength: God's people must wait His time. Notice that it does not say, before kings, or the kings, reigned, as if it were a history. It says before a king, or any king, reigned. That seems to point to a time when there was no king at all that anyone knew of. Yet kings had been promised to Jacob, and the first place, and none to Esau; yet Esau had them when Jacob had none.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Dating the eight

How long did these reigns run? One writer measures them against a man alive in Moses' day.

The list of kings in Edom consists of eight. Now Phinehas was the seventh from Jacob, and he was in full activity and strength in the time of Moses. So the kings of Edom named in Genesis very possibly did not extend beyond the time of Moses, though we are not given the data to fix when they began.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Quick growth, shallow roots

Commentators read this order as a pattern that repeats.

The Edomite interrupts the course of the line of God's dealings. We see at once what remarkable maturity there was here. It is always so — first that which is natural, afterwards that which is spiritual. Even then we find a rapid development of power in the family of Esau. I have no doubt this is given to us as an important point, to mark how quickly what is not of God shoots up. Growth according to God is slower, but then it is more permanent.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same pattern shows up in ordinary life:

The children of Esau had chiefs in plenty. This is an early example of what we find so often in Scripture and in our own experience: the man who loves the world and ignores God goes ahead in the world beyond the man who fears God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A crown no son inherited

Bela reigns from Dinhabah; the next king comes from another city, and so on down the list.

Violence seems to have characterised them, for not one king is succeeded by his son. As one faction won out over another, different cities produced different kings. In the end, it appears, their royal authority was cut back, and chiefs followed them. This change in the form of authority is not unknown in our own day. It shows a characteristic element — we might say flaw — in human power: its instability. Man is unable to keep supreme and sole power in himself.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Names that pass, a King who remains

Scripture gives these rulers a line each and moves on.

The Holy Spirit does not occupy us with the grandeur and might of those who rose to power when Israel lost the inheritance… He passes on to the birth of the true King. Here, in Genesis, we have only a list of names to tell us that this chief and that king once lived. Their power was short-lived and their greatness faded, and Scripture dismisses them in a few words.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Against that fading list stands one throne that does not change hands:

God lets the world show itself, and its power — or rather its lack of power — first. Then come His purpose and its firm foundation. For there were kings in Edom before any were found in Israel. The Edomite kings are gone, but God's King abides for ever. Edom is singled out like this because of their great hatred of Israel. They were among the most relentless of all the nations around them (Num. 20:14-21). It showed long years later, when the Edomite rejoiced at the overthrow of Jerusalem by the Babylonians (Psalm 137). For this very reason they are remembered for judgment (Obadiah 10).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- First — Edom had a settled, ordered kingdom before Israel did. The natural comes first, the spiritual after.

- Fast — what is not of God shoots up quickly; growth according to God is slower but lasts.

- Fragile — no Edomite king handed his crown to his son. Rival factions and rival cities exposed the flaw in human power: it cannot hold.

- Forgotten — Bela and the rest get a name and a city, and nothing more. Their power was short-lived, and Scripture dismisses them in a few words.

- Forever — kings were promised to Jacob and none to Esau. God's people must wait His time. The Edomite kings are gone; God's King abides for ever.

Genesis 36:33 · Darby

And Bela died; and Jobab the son of Zerah of Bozrah reigned in his stead.

Genesis stops to list the kings of Edom while Jacob's family is still a wandering household. One king dies, another takes his place, and a whole reign fits in a single line. Why does Scripture record a foreign royal line at all? What should we see in a throne that keeps changing hands?

Esau's Quick Rise, Jacob's Long Wait

Chapter 36 sets Esau's greatness beside Jacob's obscurity. The contrast is about timing.

The world that has turned away from God sets itself up in power, while the heirs of the promise are still poor pilgrims on the earth. This last point is a distinct part of what God has revealed.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The speed of that rise is itself the lesson.

The Edomite line interrupts the course of God's dealings. We see at once how fully developed it already was. It is always so — first the natural, then the spiritual. Even then we find power growing fast in the family of Esau… I have no doubt this is given to us for an important reason. It marks how quickly what is not of God shoots up. Growth according to God is slower, but then it is more permanent.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Kings Promised to Israel, Not to Edom

God promised kings to Jacob's line, not to Esau's. Yet Bela and Jobab already reign, and Jacob's family still has no king.

Edom had kings before Israel had any; that is all that is said. The point worth recording was that Edom had kings while Israel still had none. Edom was a settled nation under steady rule before God's people Israel were. In the chapter before, God had promised that kings would come from Jacob. Yet the natural went first in apparent strength: God's people must wait His time.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Some argue that a list like this comes from long after Moses. The wording itself answers them.

Suppose this passage came from a time after Saul or David's line began to reign. The wording would then have been different — not "any" king or "a" king, but "the king" or "the kings."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Throne Without an Heir

Jobab does not inherit from Bela; he replaces him. That pattern runs through the whole list.

The kings of Edom are listed next… Violence marks this whole race, because not a single one of these kings has his own son as his successor.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

One writer traces the pattern to rival factions fighting for the crown:

As one faction won out over another, different cities produced different kings. In the end, it seems, their royal authority was cut back, and dukes followed them. We still see this change in the form of authority in our own day. It shows a typical feature — we might say a flaw — of human power: its instability. Man is unable to retain supreme and sole power in himself.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Bozrah in the Prophets

Jobab comes from Bozrah. The prophets name that same city again.

Bozrah was the royal city of Edom, and the prophets pronounced judgments on it… Christ is pictured coming from there with garments stained red, after treading the winepress of His wrath on the nations (Gentiles). Isa. 63:1-4: compare Isa. 34.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

One writer explains why judgment falls on this nation in particular, and what outlasts its kings:

God lets the world show itself first, and its power — or rather its lack of power. Then comes His purpose, with its firm foundation… The Edomite kings are gone, but God's King remains forever. Edom gets this special mention because of their great hatred of Israel. They were one of the most relentless of all the nations around them (Num. 20:14-21). It showed itself long years later, when the Edomites rejoiced at the overthrow of Jerusalem by the Babylonians (Psalm 137). For this very reason God remembers them for judgment (Obadiah 10).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A Suggested Link to Job

Job's homeland is placed in or near Edom, and one ancient translation goes a step further.

Most place the land of Uz (chapter 1:1) east of the river Jordan, toward the border of Arabia, in the land of Edom (compare Lam. 4:21) or nearby. In the Septuagint (the Greek translation of the Old Testament) Job is even identified with Jobab, the second king of the Edomites (Gen. 36:33).

Modernised from Arend RemmersOriginal wording

Summary

- Timing. The world's power comes up first and fast; the heirs of promise are still pilgrims. What is not of God shoots up quickly — growth according to God is slower, but lasts.

- Promise. Israel had the promise of kings and none yet; Edom had no such promise and had a line of them already. God's people must wait His time.

- Wording. "Any king," not "the king," fits a writer who lived before Israel had kings — Moses, not a later hand.

- Instability. Bela dies and Jobab takes his place; no son ever succeeds his father. Man cannot hold power in himself.

- Ending. Bozrah, the city named in this verse, is where the prophets say judgment will fall. Edom's kings are gone. God's King remains forever.