And it came to pass when Rachel had borne Joseph, that Jacob said to Laban, Send me away, that I may go to my place and to my country.
Joseph's birth marks a turning point in Jacob's long stay with Laban: as soon as Rachel bears a son, Jacob asks to go home. Why should one child's arrival change a man's whole outlook — and why, having asked, does he not leave?
Jacob has to ask, because in Haran he is a servant in another man's house. The son born to him changes how that life feels.
As soon as Jacob receives Joseph, the child of promise, the son of his beloved Rachel, he speaks of leaving Padan, the place of his exile and bondage. See Gen. 30:25-26. Simple as this seems, it has character in it. The condition of an alien and servant did not suit him once he had the seed that showed him the power of God on his behalf. He may have felt, almost by instinct, that it was now right for him to assert his freedom and to think of his home and his inheritance.
Jacob asks to go to his own home and country — older translations read "my own place." Those words point to the land of God's promise, not to Haran. One writer draws a rule from this that reaches far beyond Jacob.
In verse 25, we find that the birth of Joseph helped to lift Jacob himself to a higher level. As a result, his mind turned to the land that was his according to God's purpose, and he wanted to go back there. We may take it as a rule, true in every age, that the divine purpose becomes all-important to the believer who enters into communion with God. Jacob realized afresh that there was a country he could call "my own place."
The verse dates Jacob's move to the day Rachel bore Joseph. The name she gave the boy tells its own story.
Rachel shows the way of faith on the same occasion. She calls her son "Joseph," that is, "adding." She was sure that the Lord, who had now begun His mercies towards her, would go on with them and complete them. In the same spirit, faith in our hearts and on our lips says today, "He who did not spare His own Son but gave Him up for us all, how will He not also with Him graciously give us all things?" From His gifts Rachel drew more than a plea to ask Him for still more. In bolder, happier faith she drew the conclusion that she could trust Him for still more.
This is a real change of heart, but one writer is careful not to overstate it. Jacob's schooling was far from over.
The needed discipline was not ended: Jacob had yet to learn more of himself under the good dealings of God. His life still bore a sadly mixed crop. But from here we see his heart turn toward the land. He had long been an exile from it, through his mother's schemes and his own.
This was not a passing mood. Jacob's words fit the pattern of his whole time in Haran.
As soon as the purpose or hand of the Lord gives him his dismissal, he leaves. He leaves even though Laban's contract and God's blessing were making it profitable for him to stay. He leaves even though he might well judge that Esau's hatred waited for him if he dared to return. But so it was. With loss behind him and danger before him, he leaves. Indeed, such had been his purpose all along, from beginning to end.
Jacob asks, but he does not go. Laban does not want to lose him, and the delay costs Jacob dearly.
It is fitting that when Joseph is born, Jacob's thoughts turn toward his proper home in Canaan (v. 25). When the person of Christ dawns on the believer's vision, he begins to realize that he should be in God's place for him. However, when Jacob tells Laban that he means to leave, Laban does not want to lose the service of his son-in-law... If Jacob had insisted on leaving then, he and Laban would have parted on better terms than they did later.
- Gift. A son from God changed how Jacob saw Haran. Life as an alien and a servant no longer suited him once he held the proof of God's power for him.
- Longing. Nearness to God turns the heart toward God's purpose. Jacob realized afresh that he had a country of his own.
- Faith. Rachel named her son "adding." She took one mercy as the promise of more, and made God's gifts a reason to trust Him for still more.
- Delay. Jacob asked but did not insist. Laban's unwillingness kept him there, and the parting later was far worse.
- Home. Jacob always meant to return. He left with loss behind him and danger ahead: home mattered more than profit or safety.
Give [me] my wives for whom I have served thee, and my children; that I may go away, for thou knowest my service which I have served thee.
Joseph has just been born. With that birth, Jacob turns to Laban, the father-in-law who has used him, cheated him and grown rich on his work. He asks to be let go, with the wives and children he has already paid for in labour. His words raise three questions. What is his? What has his service earned? And where does he belong?
Jacob had spent long years in Syria. He grew rich there, and Laban cheated him there. Commentators tie his sudden ask to the son Rachel had just borne.
He is the victim of deception. He finds that others besides himself can drive hard bargains. Yet despite all this, a clear faith holds the man to the promises of God. Even his prosperity does not make him lose sight of them. And when Joseph is born — a picture of Christ in a marked and distinct way, as we shall soon see — a longing takes hold of Jacob. He wants to be back in the land of promise, where God will give the blessings of His covenant, and where God Himself had promised to give him his inheritance.
Jacob is asking to be let go. One writer reads it as the moment Jacob stopped accepting life as a servant.
As soon as Joseph is given to him — the child of promise, the son of his beloved Rachel — Jacob speaks of leaving Padan, the place of his exile and slavery. Simple as this looks, there is character in it. Life as a foreigner and a servant no longer suited him, once he had the son who showed him God's power working for him. He may have felt, almost by instinct, that it was now right for him to claim his freedom, and to turn his thoughts to his home and his inheritance.
Jacob was far from Canaan, yet he calls it his own place. God's purpose is why he can say that. One writer draws a wider rule from it.
The birth of Joseph helped to lift Jacob to a higher level. As a result, his mind turned to the land that was his by God's purpose, and he wanted to go back there. We may take it as a given, true in every age, that when a believer comes into communion with God, God's purpose becomes the most important thing to him. Jacob realized afresh that there was a country he could call "my own place."
Jacob asks for his family as wages he has earned. The prophet Hosea sums up those years the same way, and one writer sees God's hand in them.
As the prophet Hosea puts it, Jacob fled into the field of Aram, and Israel served for a wife, and for a wife he kept sheep. He became an exile from the land of promise, cheated in a foreign land by his own relatives. That was the sad repayment for his own crooked ways. He had schemed to get what the Lord had already given him, and what the Lord would have secured for him in His own holy way of faithfulness and truth.
Jacob can point Laban to what Laban himself knows. One writer looks at how Jacob behaved through those years.
He silently accepts the wrongs of a master who treated him badly. He serves with patience, and suffers without complaint… While he was in the house of the Syrian, Jacob knew that he was under the mighty hand of God for correction, and he behaved that way. He did not defend himself when people blamed him. He did not fight for his rights when he was wronged and treated unjustly.
Jacob asked, but he did not press it. Laban did not want to lose him, and Jacob agreed to stay.
Fittingly, when Joseph is born, Jacob's thoughts turn toward his proper home in Canaan. When the person of Christ dawns on a believer's sight, he begins to realize that he should be in the place God has for him. But when Jacob tells Laban that he means to leave, Laban does not want to lose his son-in-law's service… If Jacob had insisted on leaving then, he and Laban would have parted on better terms than they did later. But Jacob agreed to stay on terms that he himself suggested.
- Gift — Joseph's birth is the hinge. A fresh sign of God's power for him wakes Jacob's longing for the land of promise.
- Longing — communion with God makes God's purpose matter most. Only then could Jacob call a far-off country "my own place."
- Claim — life as a foreigner and servant no longer fitted a man who held the promised son, so he asked for his freedom.
- Cost — the wives and children were wages. Hosea sums up those years as serving and keeping sheep for a wife. They repaid Jacob's own crooked ways.
- Delay — he asked but did not insist, so he stayed with Laban. A clean break then would have ended better than what came later.
And Laban said to him, I pray thee, if I have found favour in thine eyes -- I have discovered that Jehovah has blessed me for thy sake.
After twenty years of service, and just after the birth of Joseph, Jacob asks Laban to let him go home. Laban will not release him, because he has worked out that his own wealth came with Jacob — which raises a question about how a believer lives among people who value him for what he brings.
The ESV has Laban say he "learned by divination." Other translations read only, "I have discovered." The Hebrew verb behind the phrase is tied to the words for a serpent and for an enchanter. One writer traces its two senses:
The word is connected with nachash, a "serpent." It is usually explained to mean a "hisser," or "whisperer," and then "a mutterer of enchantments." But the use of the verb seems to point another way. In Genesis 30, Laban begs Jacob to stay with him. "For," he says, "I divine [or, more exactly, perceive by observation] that the Lord has blessed me for your sake."… So the verb seems to have been used first of drawing a conclusion from quick observation, and later of divining.
So Laban either read omens or worked it out by watching. Some render it plainly: he "has learned by experience that the Lord has blessed him through Jacob's presence there, and does not want to lose this."
Laban's compliment was also a business decision:
Laban delayed Jacob, as it turned out, for six years. He was a shrewd man, and he recognised that Jacob's presence with him had brought blessing. He wanted to keep that blessing, and he was willing to let Jacob set his own wages. So there followed another battle of wits, and this time Jacob, not Laban, gained the advantage.
The truth of Laban's confession is beyond dispute. Even years later, when his sons grumbled that Jacob had taken everything, the question stood: "after all, what was Laban's substance before Jacob appeared on the scene?"
The pattern did not stop with Laban:
Both Jacob and Laban recognised that the Lord had done this. Since that time God has blessed many Gentile nations through the presence of Israelites among them, after Israel was scattered among the nations.
Later in Genesis the same thing happens to Joseph in Egypt, and it becomes a calling:
So Joseph became a source of blessing in the house of the Gentile: "From the time that he made him overseer in his house, and over all that he had, the Lord blessed the Egyptian's house for Joseph's sake"… The Christian is not only called to blessing but, as he goes on his way, to be a blessing.
Jacob stayed and named his own terms. The bargaining that followed showed the two men to be more alike than different:
The bargain-making Jacob meets the bargain-making Laban, and both strain every nerve to outwit each other. We cannot wonder at Laban, for he had never been at Bethel. He had seen no open heaven… he had heard no magnificent promises from the lips of the Lord. No wonder, then, that he showed a grasping, grovelling spirit; he had no other resource. It is useless to expect anything from worldly men but a worldly spirit… But it is especially humbling to find Jacob, after all he had seen and heard at Bethel, struggling with a man of the world and trying by such means to pile up property.
Jacob's reply ends with a fair question about providing for his family. But its timing shows where his heart was:
Of course it is right for a man to provide for his own house. Yet at the time Jacob was more concerned for his own house than for the house of God. Most of us put our own house first. Years passed before God told Jacob to return to Bethel ("the house of God"), where he had made his vow.
- Presence. God blessed Laban's flocks because Jacob was there — the blessing followed the man, not the owner.
- Perception. Laban worked it out, by omens or by plain watching — the Hebrew verb can mean either.
- Reach. The pattern runs on: God blessed whole nations through His scattered people, and He calls Christians to carry blessing, not only to receive it.
- Pressure. The world's praise is a trap — Laban's offer held Jacob six more years and set two bargainers straining to outwit each other.
- Priority. Jacob asked when he would provide for his own house; the house of God at Bethel waited years longer. Most of us keep the same order.
And he said, Appoint to me thy wages, and I will give it.
After twenty years in Haran, Jacob asks to go home, and Laban answers with a blank cheque: name your own price. The offer sounds generous, but Laban has just admitted that Jacob is the reason he prospers — so who is really being served?
Laban is not offering a gift. One commentator points out the sense the word "give" can carry in Scripture:
"Give," as it is sometimes used in Scripture, means to award: compare Genesis 30:28; Exodus 2:9.
Laban lets Jacob set his own contract. He has worked out what Jacob's presence is worth to him.
Laban was a shrewd man and recognized that Jacob's presence with him had brought blessing. He wished to retain that blessing, and was prepared to allow Jacob to settle his own wages. As a result there followed a further battle of wits, and this time Jacob and not Laban gained the advantage.
Laban had watched God at work in his own household for two decades. It changed nothing in him.
Laban was a thorough man of the world when Jacob entered his house, and he was the same when Jacob left it. In all his dealings, from first to last, he had his eye on his own advantage. He has to admit that the hand of God was with Jacob. But he would use that hand, through Jacob, to serve himself, and turn Jacob's interest in God to his own account. For twenty years he saw the hand of the Lord, and the working of His grace and power, in his own house, and that every day. Yet he remained a man of the world still.
Jacob had already said he wanted to leave. Laban's counter-offer was the test, and Jacob stayed — at a cost he could not yet see.
If Jacob had insisted on leaving then, he and Laban would have parted on less unpleasant terms than they did later. But Jacob agreed to stay on terms that he himself suggested.
What follows is not a tale of one honest man and one crook. Both men bargain, and Jacob slips into it with ease.
It is remarkable to see how he gets back into an atmosphere so entirely suited to his moral make-up. The bargain-making Jacob meets the bargain-making Laban, and both strain every nerve to outwit each other. Nor can we wonder at Laban, for he had never been at Bethel: he had seen no open heaven, with a ladder reaching from there to earth; he had heard no magnificent promises from the lips of the Lord... It is useless to expect from worldly men anything but a worldly spirit, and worldly principles and ways... But Jacob had seen and heard all this at Bethel. To find him struggling with a man of the world, and trying by such means to build up property, is especially humbling.
Laban offered to let Jacob name the wages. The final account came out the opposite way to what he wanted.
Laban's greedy wish to profit by Jacob's strange bargain ended in making the self-occupied master poor, and the long-defrauded servant richer and richer. Laban shows no regret for the advantage he had taken of his nephew, and not the least caring affection for his daughters or their children. It was a righteous thing, as far as it could go in its way, to repay the evil-doer and recompense the sufferer.
Jacob's years of service were paid work, and spent where God did not want him. Another Servant stands in contrast.
For his two wives he served fourteen years, but only six years for the cattle. And he was not in the place where God would have him. See the contrast with the Bridegroom who longs deeply for the bride, yet is content to be cut off and have nothing! — refusing to serve the world for hire — content to be a stranger to His brothers... loving the wages of righteousness, having a right to all, yet taking none, so that He might receive all in resurrection.
- The offer. Laban tells Jacob to fix his own wages — "give" here meaning to award or settle a price, not to hand over a gift.
- The motive. Laban watched God bless his house through Jacob for twenty years and did not change. He wanted the hand of God only as long as it paid him.
- The bargain. Jacob does not refuse the game; he plays it. The man who had seen heaven opened at Bethel matches a worldly man move for move.
- The wages. The bargain meant to enrich Laban stripped him instead. It enriched the servant he had cheated — repayment, as far as such repayment can go.
- The contrast. Christ would not serve the world for hire. He took nothing, was cut off with nothing, and received everything in resurrection.
And he said to him, Thou knowest how I have served thee, and what thy cattle has become with me.
Jacob has served Laban for fourteen years. After Joseph's birth he asks to go home to his own country. Laban does not want to lose him, so he tells Jacob to name his wages. Jacob answers by pointing to the record of his service.
Jacob does not start with a demand. He starts with facts his employer cannot deny, and both men trace the increase to the same source.
He first pointed to what Laban had already admitted. Jacob had served him faithfully. Laban had little when Jacob came, yet his flock of sheep grew greatly (v. 39). Both men recognized that the Lord had done this. Since that time God has blessed many non-Jewish nations through the presence of Israelites among them, after Israel was scattered among the nations.
Jacob asks to leave just after Joseph is born. One writer sees weight in that timing, and thinks Jacob should have held to his plan.
When Joseph is born, Jacob's thoughts turn toward his proper home in Canaan (v. 25). When Christ becomes real to a believer's sight, he begins to realize that he should be in the place God has for him. But when Jacob tells Laban he means to leave, Laban does not want to lose his son-in-law's service. He says he has learned from experience that the Lord has blessed him through Jacob's presence, and he does not want to lose this (v. 27). If Jacob had insisted on leaving then, he and Laban would have parted on better terms than they did later (Gen. 31:25-55). But Jacob agreed to stay on terms that he himself suggested.
Laban's offer to let Jacob set his own wages is not generosity. He knows where his prosperity comes from and means to keep it.
Laban, however, pushed into the matter, and in the end his thoughts won out. He held Jacob back, as it turned out, for six years. Laban was a shrewd man and recognized that Jacob's presence with him had brought blessing. He wished to keep that blessing, and was prepared to let Jacob settle his own wages. As a result there followed a further battle of wits, and this time Jacob and not Laban gained the advantage.
Jacob's claim about his service is true. But those same years were years of correction, and his patience under Laban points to something real in him.
Jacob was a man of faith, but he failed in spirituality. So he comes under the Lord's discipline, to bear more fruit and better fruit. As he had cheated at home, he suffered abroad, and most of all at the hands of his mother's brother. His patience under Laban's hardhearted wrongs testifies that he bowed to God. He could now bear to be lifted up by slow degrees. And the story of divine retribution recorded here is the turning-point.
The same writer weighs both men together, and finds neither of them innocent of the atmosphere they created.
As the married life of Isaac and Rebekah was very different from that of Jacob with his wives and their maids, so the way Abram behaved toward Lot stands in sharp contrast with the way Jacob and Laban behaved. We are now in a far more cloudy atmosphere, though in the main Jacob was a faithful servant, and Laban deceitful and selfish. But God is not mocked, even in the day when evil is allowed to work its dark way until judgment returns to righteousness.
Jacob spoke the truth about his work. Then he secured his wages by a trick of his own, and one writer will not excuse it.
Jacob served for wages. Another writer sets that beside Christ, who had a right to all and took none.
For his two wives he served twice seven years, but only six years for the cattle. And with all this he was not in the place where God would have him. See the contrast with the Bridegroom! He longed greatly for the bride, yet was content to be cut off and have nothing. He refused to serve the world for hire. He was content to be a stranger to His brothers, a foreigner to His mother's children. He served His Father in the appointed place, and truly profited the world. He became obedient to death. He loved the wages of righteousness, having a right to all, yet taking none, so that He might receive all in resurrection.
- Service. Jacob's appeal rests on a record Laban cannot dispute: years of faithful work, and a flock that grew from little into a multitude.
- Blessing. Both men trace that growth to the Lord, not to management. God later blessed other nations the same way, through Israel living among them.
- Grip. Laban lets Jacob name his own wages out of shrewdness, not kindness. He wanted to keep the blessing he had spotted.
- Discipline. The man who cheated at home suffered abroad. His patience under wrong shows he bowed to God, and this is the turning-point of his story.
- Warning. Jacob spoke honestly, then secured his pay by craft — the world's way of righting a wrong, not God's. Christ served on other terms: a right to all, yet taking none.
For it was little that thou hadst before me, and it is increased to a multitude, and Jehovah has blessed thee from the time I came; and now, when shall I also provide for my house?
Twenty years of shepherding stand behind these words. Jacob sets out what Laban owned before he came and what Laban owns now. He credits the growth to God, then asks when he will provide for his own family.
Jacob's first argument is the size of Laban's herds. Both men traced the growth to the same source, and that pattern outlasted Jacob himself.
He first stressed what Laban had already admitted. Jacob had served him faithfully, so that though Laban had little when Jacob came, his flock of sheep grew greatly (v. 39). Both of them recognised that the Lord had done this. Since then God has blessed many nations outside Israel through the Israelites living among them, after Israel was scattered among the nations.
Laban had worked out the same arithmetic, and it shaped what he did next.
Laban, however, broke into the question, and in the end his thoughts won out. He delayed Jacob, as it turned out, for six years. Laban was a shrewd man, and he saw that Jacob's presence with him had brought blessing. He wanted to keep that blessing, and he was willing to let Jacob set his own wages. As a result there followed a further battle of wits, and this time Jacob, not Laban, gained the advantage.
The closing question of the verse is not wrong in itself. A man ought to care for his family. The problem lies in what it crowded out.
Then Jacob asks, "When shall I provide for my own household also?" Certainly it is right for a man to provide for his own house. Yet Jacob was at the time more concerned for his own house than he was for the house of God. Most of us put our own house first. Some years passed before God told Jacob to return to Bethel ("the house of God"), where he had made his vow (Gen. 31:13).
Jacob's flocks did grow. His home life did not improve with them, and the name God later used of Himself shows why.
The title "the God of Bethel" is of very real importance, for it means "God of the house of God." Jacob had been concerned about his own house (Gen. 30:30), allowing the claims of God's house to wait. But the growth of Jacob's house had not brought peace and happiness into all his relationships. It was time for him to learn that true contentment is found only in connection with God's house, where God's interests come first.
Jacob's trust in God had a boundary, and this verse marks it.
He could well believe that the Lord would bless others, but as for his own house, he himself must provide for that. Through it all, and in spite of it all, the unseen God heard the desire of Jacob's heart and gave him his fill. Yet in his own thought he had done it all, with God little known or acknowledged.
Jacob asked when he would provide for his own household. The answer came from God's hand, not his own.
When the words of Laban's sons and the looks of Laban himself showed their discontent, the Lord told Jacob to return to the land of his fathers. God's providence paid Jacob in some five or six years what Laban had cheated him out of over twenty. They really wanted to get rid of Jacob, but shrank from saying so. After all, what was Laban's property before Jacob appeared on the scene?
The verse raises a question still asked today: who should benefit from a faithful worker's labour?
Jacob did the hard work of caring for Laban's flocks for twenty years. Laban had sons who could have helped with this work, but it seems they left the work to the one man who could do it well. Were Laban and his sons all sharing the benefits of Jacob's work without having to work themselves? It seemed this was the case. Employers often think they have the right to take every benefit that labour produces, because they put up the original money. But God takes account of the guilt of employers who oppress their workers (James 5:4).
- Service. Jacob worked twenty years for Laban. Both men admitted that Laban's small holding grew large because the Lord blessed it.
- Overflow. God's people bring blessing into the homes they serve. Israel did the same among the nations after being scattered.
- Grip. Laban saw that blessing, wanted to keep it, and used the wage question to hold Jacob six more years.
- Priority. Providing for your own house is right. Putting it before God's house is the mistake. Jacob's growing flocks never bought him peace at home.
- Repayment. Jacob trusted God to bless another man's house, but provided for his own by himself. God still repaid in five or six years the wages Laban had withheld for twenty.
And he said, What shall I give thee? And Jacob said, Thou shalt not give me anything. If thou doest this for me, I will again feed [and] keep thy flock
Jacob has asked to leave. Laban knows this shepherd is the reason he has prospered, so he lets Jacob fix his own pay. Jacob asks for nothing and offers to keep tending the flock. Is that the boldness of faith, or the first move of a shrewd man?
Laban's offer was not generosity. It was calculation.
Laban, however, broke into the question, and in the end his thoughts won. He delayed Jacob, as it turned out, for six years. Laban was a shrewd man and recognized that Jacob's presence with him had brought blessing. He wished to keep that blessing, and was prepared to let Jacob settle his own wages. As a result there followed a further battle of wits, and this time Jacob and not Laban gained the advantage.
What Jacob asked for next explains why Laban agreed.
Jacob suggested wages that seemed very low. He asked for only the speckled and spotted sheep and goats and the black lambs. The normally coloured sheep and goats would therefore all belong to Laban. Laban saw himself as having the great advantage in this bargain. In this there is no doubt that Jacob wanted to show he was depending on God to give him what He wanted Jacob to have. The element of faith in God was certainly there. We know that God answered such faith. Yet we see later that his faith was weak. He resorted to human trickery in trying to make the sheep produce as he wished.
Commentators differ on how much credit Jacob deserves here. Some see faith; others look hard at the method he chose.
God did step in graciously for His injured servant. Even so, we could not imagine either his father or his grandfather using the kind of scheme Jacob used to get the fruit of his long and patient service, which was owed to him. Yet God stooped to use what, without His power, would have been, if not useless, then very limited.
Others see the whole deal as one more display of his name. Jacob means "supplanter" — one who trips a man up and takes his place.
The closing verses of this chapter reveal the device he used. It increased his flocks at Laban's expense. We notice how true he still is to his name — meaning Supplanter.
Laban had cheated him for years. That still did not settle how Jacob should answer.
Using counter-tricks to reverse the situation is quite the way of the world, but it is not according to God. If Jacob had rested with confidence in God, and not used the devices described in this chapter, the end God purposed would still have been reached, and his righteousness would have answered for him in a much more convincing way.
His offer to keep the flock again was not empty. Long and patient service stood behind it, and God was at work on the man himself all through it.
Jacob was a man of faith, but he failed in spirituality. So he comes under the Lord's discipline, to make him bear more fruit and better fruit. As he had cheated at home, he suffered abroad, and most of all at the hands of his mother's brother. His patience under Laban's hardhearted wrongs shows that he bowed to God. He could now bear to be lifted up by slow degrees. And the story of divine retribution recorded here is the turning point.
Grasping for the whole flock cost Laban the flock.
Laban greedily hoped to profit by Jacob's strange bargain. Instead it left the self-absorbed master poor, and gave the long-cheated servant new and growing wealth.
Set beside Christ, Jacob's bargain looks small. He gave up a wage, but not the world's service.
See the contrast with the Bridegroom longing greatly for the bride, yet content to be cut off and have nothing! — refusing to serve the world for hire — content to be a stranger to His brothers, a foreigner to His mother's children. He served His Father in the appointed place. He truly benefited the world. He became obedient to death. He loved the wages of righteousness. He had a right to everything, yet took nothing, so that He might receive all in resurrection.
Yet one detail points forward. Jacob chose the least valued animals as his wage.
The servant is willing to take the speckled and spotted of the flock as his pay. Christ is willing to accept what the world despises.
- The bait. Laban knew Jacob's presence brought him blessing. He let Jacob name his own wage to keep the profit, and a battle of wits followed.
- The wage. Jacob asked for nothing but the speckled and spotted. It looked like a poor deal, and Laban thought he had won.
- The faith. Depending on God to hand him what God wanted him to have was real faith, and God answered it.
- The flaw. The faith slipped into trickery. Jacob used a scheme his father and grandfather never needed. Had he simply trusted God, the same end would have come, and far more convincingly.
- The contrast. Jacob served the world for hire. Christ refused hire. He had a right to everything, took nothing, and receives all in resurrection.
I will pass through all thy flock to-day, to remove thence all the speckled and spotted sheep, and all the brown lambs, and the spotted and speckled among the goats; and [that] shall be my hire.
Jacob wanted to leave Laban, but Laban kept him and let him name his own pay. He asked only for the odd-marked animals in a flock of mostly plain ones — trust in God, or one more clever move?
Jacob had asked to leave. Laban had his own reason for keeping him.
Laban, however, pushed into the question, and in the end his thoughts won. He delayed Jacob, as it turned out, for six years. Laban was a shrewd man and recognised that Jacob's presence with him had brought blessing. He wished to keep that blessing, and was prepared to let Jacob set his own wages. As a result there followed a further battle of wits, and this time Jacob and not Laban gained the advantage.
The terms Jacob names sound almost too modest. One writer reads real trust in that.
Jacob suggested wages that seemed to be very low, asking for only the speckled and spotted sheep and goats and the black lambs. The normally coloured sheep and goats would therefore all belong to Laban. Laban saw himself as having the great advantage in this bargain (vv. 32-34). There is no doubt that Jacob wanted to show he was depending on God to give him what He wanted him to have. Faith in God was certainly there. We know that God answered such faith. Yet we see later that his faith was weak when he turned to human tricks in trying to make the sheep produce as he wanted (vv. 37-42).
Commentators differ on how much faith to grant Jacob here. Another writer finds no trust in this bargain at all. Jacob's name means supplanter — one who takes another's place by craft.
Jacob cannot allow God to settle the question as to his wives and his wages, but tries to settle everything by his own cunning and management. In short, it is "the supplanter" throughout. Turn, for example, to Gen. 30:37-42, and say where you can find a more skilful piece of cunning. It is a perfect picture of Jacob.
Whatever Jacob's motives, the bargain did not decide the outcome.
Laban's greedy desire to profit by Jacob's strange bargain ended up impoverishing the self-occupied master. Meanwhile the long-defrauded servant gained new and growing wealth. Laban shows no regret for the advantage he had taken of his nephew. He shows not the least caring affection for his daughters or their children either. It was a righteous thing, as far as it could go in its way, to repay the evil-doer and to make up to the sufferer.
One writer sees more in the choice of the speckled and spotted than a shepherd's sums.
The servant is willing to take the speckled and spotted of the flock for his hire — Christ is willing to accept what the world despises.
Another writer sets Jacob's years of hired service beside Christ.
See the contrast with the Bridegroom! He longed deeply for the bride, yet He was content to be cut off and have nothing. He refused to serve the world for hire. He was content to be a stranger to His brothers, a foreigner to His mother's children. He served His Father in the appointed place, and so truly profited the world. He became obedient to death. He loved the wages of righteousness. He had a right to all, yet He took none, so that He might receive all in resurrection.
- Bargain. Jacob asked only for the speckled, spotted and black animals. The pay looked so small that Laban thought he had the better deal.
- Faith. Naming so little showed Jacob leaning on God to supply what He wanted him to have. God answered that faith.
- Flesh. The same man later turned to tricks with the flocks — the supplanter, settling by his own cunning what he could have left to God.
- Reversal. Laban's greed in agreeing emptied him. The long-cheated servant grew rich — a righteous repayment of the wrongdoer.
- Christ. The despised part of the flock pictures what Christ is content to receive. Unlike Jacob, He refused to serve the world for hire. He took nothing, so that He might receive all in resurrection.
And my righteousness shall answer for me hereafter, when thou comest about my hire, before thy face all that is not speckled and spotted among the goats, and brown among the lambs, let that be stolen with me.
Jacob has just named his wages: he will take only the odd-coloured animals from Laban's flock. He then stakes his good name on a test anyone could run.
Jacob invited a future check: any plain animal found with him would count as stolen. On the face of it he asked for very little. Odd-coloured animals were few, and the rest of the flock stayed with Laban.
Jacob asked for wages that looked very low: only the speckled and spotted sheep and goats, and the black lambs. All the normally coloured sheep and goats would then belong to Laban. That share was small indeed, and Laban saw himself as having the great advantage in this bargain. There is no doubt that Jacob wanted to show he was depending on God to give him what He wanted Jacob to have. Faith in God was surely there, and we know God answered such faith. Yet we see later that his faith was weak, for he used human tricks to try to make the sheep breed as he wished.
The ESV says "my honesty"; older translations, which the writers below quote, read "my righteousness." Jacob wants the flock itself to speak for him later. Yet the standard he sets exposes his own. Laban had wronged him for years, and Jacob's answer was to out-manoeuvre him.
About this matter Jacob had said to Laban, "So shall my righteousness answer for me in time to come." That seems to show he had a rather low idea of what is right in the sight of God. Laban had clearly taken advantage of him in the past. But to use counter-tricks to turn the tables is the way of the world, not the way of God.
Commentators differ here. Another writer sees craft from the start: the offer would pay Jacob far better than any wage Laban would have named.
In their last agreement Jacob made an offer that, if Laban accepted it, his craft would make far more profitable than any wages Laban would give. It was one of his meanest schemes. But notice his lack of conscience: "So shall my righteousness answer for me in time to come." Laban is completely fooled. He jumps at the offer, but soon finds out his mistake.
The check Jacob invited never had to clear his name. The deal did turn in his favour — but not by Jacob's own management.
We are now allowed to see how God stepped in and made the agreement about the spotted and speckled cattle work in Jacob's favour. In the light of this, our thought would be this. If he had rested with confidence in God, and not used the tricks described in the last chapter, God would still have reached the end He purposed. And his "righteousness" would have answered for him far more convincingly.
Laban cheated Jacob again and again over twenty years of service. Repayment came quickly at the end, and it came from God.
In some five or six years God's providence paid Jacob the wages Laban had cheated him out of for twenty years. Laban and his sons wanted to be rid of Jacob, but would not say so. After all, what did Laban own before Jacob came on the scene?
One writer reads the arrangement as a picture of Christ. The servant asks for the animals nobody wants, and that is what later stirs up his master's anger.
The servant is willing to take the speckled and spotted of the flock as his wages. So Christ is willing to accept what the world despises. But it becomes known that these animals grow strong and many by looking at the partly peeled rod — which may mean the word with its inner meaning partly opened. Then Laban's greed and hostility flare up. In the end he loses the man through whom he had received great wealth, and loses his wealth with him.
- The claim. Jacob invites Laban to check his flock. He calls the result his honesty, in a test set up so that only the odd-coloured animals can be his.
- The flaw. Answering a cheat with tricks of your own is the way of the world. It shows a low idea of what is right before God.
- The repayment. God's providence paid Jacob in five or six years the wages Laban had cheated him out of for twenty.
- The answer. God, not Jacob's skill, moved the flocks over to him. Had Jacob rested in God instead, his righteousness would have spoken for him far more convincingly.
- The greater Servant. Taking the despised part of the flock as wages pictures Christ. He accepts what the world throws away, and the world ends up poorer for losing Him.
And Laban said, Well, let it be according to thy word.
Jacob has just named his wages — only the speckled, spotted, and dark animals — and Laban agrees on the spot. Why did such a shrewd man accept so fast, and whose side was the deal on?
Laban did the arithmetic in his head and liked it. The animals Jacob asked for were the rare exceptions in the flock, which left the ordinary-coloured majority to Laban.
Jacob suggested wages that seemed to be very low, asking for only the speckled and spotted sheep and goats and the black lambs. The normally coloured sheep and goats would therefore all belong to Laban. Such a percentage for Jacob would seem to be low indeed, and Laban saw himself as having the great advantage in this bargain.
Laban had already worked out that Jacob's presence paid, which is why he let Jacob set his own price in the first place.
Laban was a shrewd man and recognized that Jacob's presence with him had brought blessing. He wished to retain that blessing, and was prepared to allow Jacob to settle his own wages. As a result there ensued a further battle of wits, and this time Jacob and not Laban gained the advantage.
Commentators differ on what was in Jacob's heart when he made the offer. Grant, in the passage quoted above, sees real trust in it — Jacob leaving the outcome to God rather than naming a guaranteed sum. Others read the same proposal as a trap Laban walked straight into, and they fasten on Jacob's confident talk about his own honesty.
In their last agreement Jacob made a proposition which if accepted would be made by his craft far more profitable than any wages Laban would give. It was one of his meanest schemes; but mark his want of conscience: "So shall my righteousness answer for me in time to come." Laban, quite deceived, eagerly embraces the proposal, but soon finds out his mistake.
That appeal to "my righteousness" is itself a warning sign to some readers.
Jacob had said to Laban, "So shall my righteousness answer for me in time to come." This seems to show that he had a low idea of what is right in the sight of God. It was quite clear that Laban had taken advantage of him in the past. But to use counter-tricks to reverse the situation is the way of the world, not the way of God.
Laban's "Good!" was the sound of greed closing on bait. The years that followed reversed the two men's fortunes completely.
Laban's covetous desire to profit by Jacob's strange bargain turned to the impoverishing of the self-occupied master, and the new and growing affluence of the long defrauded servant. Neither compunction appears on Laban's part for the advantage he had taken of his nephew, nor the least considerate affection for his daughters or their children. It was a righteous thing, as far as it could go in its way, to requite the evil-doer and recompense the sufferer.
Jacob went on to help the bargain along with peeled rods at the watering troughs. Looking back from chapter 31, where God tells Jacob it was He who transferred the flocks, one writer draws the obvious conclusion about the whole arrangement.
We are now permitted to see how God had intervened and caused the agreement as to the spotted and speckled cattle to work in his favour. In the light of this our reflection would be that if he had rested with confidence in God, and not used the devices related in the last chapter, the end God purposed would have been reached, and his "righteousness" would have answered for him in a much more convincing way.
None of this cancelled God's care for Jacob — though it does sit oddly beside the lives of the men before him.
Whatever the gracious intervention of God for His injured servant, we could not conceive either his father or his grandfather adopting such an expedient as Jacob employed to acquire the fruit of his long and patient service that was due. Yet God condescended to use what without His power had been, if not in vain, but very partial.
One writer traces that pattern through Jacob's whole life and finds grace in it.
It is in tracing out Jacob's real character, stage by stage of his remarkable history, that one gets a wonderful view of divine grace. Grace begins at the very lowest point. It takes man up as he is, and deals with him in full knowledge of what he is. Nothing matters more than to grasp this about grace at the very start. It lets us face, with a steady heart, the later discoveries of how vile we are — discoveries that so often shake the confidence and disturb the peace of God's children.
- Greed agrees. Laban said yes at once. The terms looked tilted his way: Jacob took the few odd-coloured animals, Laban kept the rest.
- Greed loses. The bargain he grabbed at made him poor and made the servant he had cheated rich — a fitting repayment of the wrongdoer.
- Greed meets craft. Commentators differ. Some see faith in Jacob's low asking price. Others hear a low standard of right in his talk of "my righteousness."
- God gives anyway. God Himself moved the flocks to Jacob. Had Jacob rested in that instead of using tricks, his claim to be right would have spoken for him far more clearly.
- Grace begins low. God still stooped to use a man whose methods his own father and grandfather would never have used. Grace starts at the lowest point, so it can steady you when you discover your own.
And he removed that day the he-goats that were ringstraked and spotted, and all the she-goats that were speckled and spotted, every one that had white in it, and all the brown among the lambs, and gave [them] into the hand of his sons.
Genesis 30 ends with a business deal between two men who each expect to outwit the other. Jacob has asked for the oddly-marked animals as his pay, and that same day Laban pulls every one of them out and hands them to his own sons.
Laban took two precautions. He pulled the marked animals out of the flock Jacob would tend, then put a wide gap between the two herds.
All the special class of sheep he left with his sons. Then he himself took all Laban's sheep a long distance from the others, a three days' journey (v. 36). This assured Laban that his sheep would not mix with any spotted or speckled ones. Since Laban's sheep were all a normal colour, it was not likely there would be many born for Jacob to claim.
The terms Jacob proposed sounded like a gift to his employer.
Jacob suggested wages that looked very low. He asked only for the speckled and spotted sheep and goats and the black lambs. The normally coloured sheep and goats would therefore all belong to Laban. Such a share for Jacob looked very small indeed. Laban saw himself as having the great advantage in this bargain (vv. 32-34). There is no doubt that Jacob wanted to show he was depending on God to give him what He wanted Jacob to have. Faith in God was certainly part of this.
Laban now treats Jacob as Jacob once treated others. One writer sees his years with Laban as measured repayment.
No doubt he often had to suffer from Laban's deceit. But was this not a reminder of the deceit he had used himself? Laban deceives him about his wife, about his wages, about everything. Yet how had Jacob dealt with his father, not to mention his brother? Deceit must meet with deceit under the retributive hands of God. Do not wonder too much at the story of Jacob. Bless with all your heart the God who shows Himself caring for His servant. After Jacob had suffered a while, God let him prosper slowly but surely.
Having said he would leave the outcome to God, Jacob then goes to work on the breeding of the flock himself.
True, God was with Jacob — for nothing can stop divine grace from shining out... Still nothing can be done without a scheme and a plan. Jacob cannot let God settle the question of his wives and his wages. He tries to settle everything by his own cunning and management. In short, it is "the supplanter" throughout. Turn, for example, to Genesis 30:37-42, and say where you can find a more skilful piece of cunning.
Jacob had offered his own honesty as the proof of the deal. One writer notes what he lost by not leaving the outcome with God.
Suppose he had rested with confidence in God, and had not used the tricks described in this chapter. God would still have reached the end He purposed. And Jacob's "righteousness" would have spoken for him far more convincingly.
Jacob's scheme was not what made him rich.
In about five or six years, God's providence paid Jacob the wages Laban had cheated him out of for twenty years... He could truly say that even if Laban showed ill-will, the God of his father was with him. And if Laban tried to cheat him, God did not let him be harmed.
Jacob's tricks do not excuse his employer. One writer takes this straight to how employers treat workers today.
Jacob did the hard work of caring for Laban's flocks for twenty years. Laban had sons who could have helped with this work... Management often thinks it has a right to every benefit that labour produces, because management put up the money at the start. But God takes account of the guilt of management in the oppression of its employees (James 5:4).
Neither man in this chapter comes out well. Yet God did not walk away from Jacob.
None but God could have borne with such a man, as none but God would have taken such a man up. Grace begins at the very lowest point. It takes up man as he is, and deals with him in the full knowledge of what he is.
- Terms — Jacob asked for only the oddly-marked animals, a share so small that Laban thought he had won.
- Barrier — that same day Laban took out every marked animal and gave it to his sons. He then set three days' journey between the flocks, so Jacob's flock would breed few of them.
- Mirror — the deceiver was now the deceived. One writer sees Jacob's years under Laban as repayment for how he had treated his father and brother.
- Scheme — Jacob would not leave the result with God. He managed the breeding himself, and lost the clear proof of his honesty.
- Providence — God, not Jacob's scheme, moved the flocks from Laban to Jacob. He repaid twenty cheated years in about five or six, and His grace kept working with a man like this.
And he put three days' journey between himself and Jacob. And Jacob fed the rest of Laban's flock.
Laban answers Jacob's wage agreement by putting a three-day gap between the flocks. The marked animals go with his own sons. The rest stay in Jacob's care. The distance looks like plain caution. But it raises the question that runs through the chapter: who decides how a flock increases?
Laban had just pulled out every striped, speckled and spotted animal and handed them to his sons. That left Jacob tending a flock of plain colour, and the gap kept it that way.
All the special class of sheep he left with his sons. Then he himself took all Laban's sheep a long distance from the others, a matter of three days' journey (v. 36). That way Laban could be sure his sheep would not mix with any spotted or speckled. Since Laban's sheep were all a normal colour, not many were likely to be born for Jacob to claim. However, being so far away, Jacob could put into operation his cunning plan to make Laban's sheep bear striped, speckled or spotted lambs. He took fresh rods from trees, peeled strips of bark off them, and put them in front of the sheep when they came to drink (v. 38).
Jacob had asked for a share so small that Laban thought he was getting the better end of it. Commentators see something real in that. Jacob was leaving the outcome to God, though his trust did not hold for long.
Jacob suggested wages that seemed very low, asking only for the speckled and spotted sheep and goats and the black lambs... Laban saw himself as having the great advantage in this bargain (vv. 32-34). There is no doubt that Jacob wanted to show he was depending on God to give him what God wanted him to have. Faith in God was surely present here, and we know that God answered such faith. Yet we see later that his faith was weak. He turned to human scheming to make the sheep produce as he wanted (vv. 37-42).
The verse leaves Jacob pasturing the rest of Laban's flock, as he had for years. His uncle had wronged him again and again. Commentators read those years as God's discipline on Jacob's own past.
Jacob was a man of faith, but he failed in spirituality. He comes under the Lord's discipline so that he might bear more and better fruit. As he had cheated at home, he suffered abroad, and most of all at the hands of his mother's brother. His patience under Laban's hardhearted wrongs shows that he bowed to God.
Three days' distance also meant three days out of sight. The trap it set for Jacob is one we still fall into.
No doubt Laban was not aware of what Jacob was doing. Jacob wanted Laban to think he was only depending on God to decide how many sheep he should have. How often this is true of us too! We persuade ourselves that we are walking by faith in God, while using our own wits to help God supply our needs.
The flocks did change hands, and Laban's family noticed. But the cause was not the one Jacob had worked for.
Laban, according to Jacob's complaint, changed his wages ten times. Jacob got his own back by cunning tricks connected with the breeding of Laban's cattle, and according to the complaint of Laban's sons he had "taken away all that was our father's." So the contest went on until God stepped in again in a dream. He made known to Jacob that it was He, not Jacob's schemes, who caused the cattle to pass from Laban to him. And He called him out of the whole unpleasant business, back to Canaan.
Laban underpaid Jacob for twenty years. God's repayment took far less time than the fraud did.
God's providence paid Jacob in about five or six years the wages that Laban had cheated him out of for twenty years.
Was the counter-scheme fair, given how Laban had treated him? One writer answers plainly.
It was quite clear that in the past Laban had taken advantage of him. But to use counter-devices in order to reverse the situation is quite the way of the world, and it is not according to God... if he had rested with confidence in God, and had not used the devices described in the last chapter, the end God purposed would still have been reached. And his "righteousness" would have answered for him in a far more convincing way.
- Distance — Laban's three-day gap was a safeguard. A plain-coloured flock would produce almost nothing for Jacob to claim.
- Dependence — the low wage Jacob named showed real trust that God would give him his portion. God answered that faith.
- Devices — out of sight, Jacob reached for peeled rods and his own tricks. He let everyone think he was leaving it to God.
- Deliverance — God, not the rods, moved the flocks. He repaid in a few years what fraud had withheld for twenty.
- Duty — Jacob never needed the devices. Resting in God would have reached the same end, and made his righteousness far more convincing.
And Jacob took fresh rods of white poplar, almond-tree, and maple; and peeled off white stripes in them, uncovering the white which was on the rods.
Jacob and Laban have struck a deal over the speckled and spotted animals in the flock. Here Jacob makes sure the deal pays. He cuts fresh branches, peels white streaks in them, and lays them where the flocks breed. Was this trust in God, or was Jacob scheming again?
The verse names the trees. Writers give the Hebrew name behind the first one, and explain what "fresh" means here:
The word is libneh. It was probably the white poplar (Populus alba) that Jacob used: it was "green" in the sense of being fresh, moist.
The second name has changed in English Bibles:
The word is luz, which is now thought to refer to the "almond," and is so translated in the Revised Version. Gen. 30:37.
The plan itself was simple, and it worked:
He took fresh rods from trees and peeled strips of bark off them. Then he put them in front of the sheep when they came to drink (v. 38). The sheep mated at this time, and the plan worked very well for Jacob. A very large number of striped, speckled or spotted lambs were born.
One writer finds here Jacob the supplanter at his most cunning:
There is no holy, lifted-up confidence in God here, no simply looking to Him and waiting on Him. True, God was with Jacob, for nothing can stop the shining out of divine grace… Still, nothing happens without a scheme and a plan. Jacob cannot let God settle the question of his wives and his wages. He tries to settle it all by his own cunning and management. In short, he is "the supplanter" all through. Look at Genesis 30:37-42, and say where you can find a cleverer piece of cunning.
Jacob wanted to look like a man leaving the outcome to God. The peeled rods told a different story:
No doubt Laban had no idea what Jacob was doing. Jacob wanted Laban to think he was only depending on God to decide how many sheep he should have. How often this is true of us too! We persuade ourselves that we are walking by faith in God, while we use our own wits to help God supply our needs.
His hard years away from home were not random. What Jacob had done to others came back on him:
Jacob was a man of faith, but he failed in spiritual life. So he comes under the Lord's discipline, so that he might bear more fruit, and better fruit. As he had cheated at home, he suffered abroad, and at the hands of his mother's brother most of all.
God Himself made the agreement turn out in Jacob's favour. That leaves a plain lesson for anyone reading this chapter:
Now we are allowed to see how God stepped in and made the agreement about the spotted and speckled cattle work in Jacob's favour. In the light of this, our thought would be this. If he had rested with confidence in God, and had not used the tricks described in Genesis 30, God would still have reached the end He purposed. And Jacob's "righteousness" would have spoken for him in a much more convincing way.
There was a limit to what the scheme did. The trick Jacob used was one neither Abraham nor Isaac would have chosen, even though God acted kindly for His wronged servant (William Kelly).
after-note: DISCUSS
The chapter is humbling. Yet it also shows how grace works:
Grace begins at the very lowest point. It takes up man as he is, and deals with him in the full intelligence of what he is. It is vitally important to understand this feature of grace right at the start. It lets us face, with a steady heart, the later discoveries of how bad we really are — discoveries that so often shake the confidence and disturb the peace of the children of God.
- The wood — Jacob used fresh, moist branches — white poplar (libneh), luz (now read as almond), and plane.
- The work — he peeled white streaks into them and set them at the drinking troughs at breeding time. Large numbers of striped and spotted young came.
- The man — writers call the plan a piece of cunning. Jacob was scheming instead of waiting on God.
- The mirror — he had cheated at home, and abroad he was cheated. We too can tell ourselves we are trusting God while using our own wits.
- The outcome — God gave the increase anyway. If Jacob had rested in Him, the same end would have come. Grace begins at the lowest point, and it met him there.
And he set the rods which he had peeled before the flock, in the troughs at the watering-places where the flock came to drink, and they were ardent when they came to drink.
Jacob has just made a wage deal with Laban, and now he sets peeled sticks where the flocks drink and breed. Two questions run through the rest of his story: was the growth of his flocks his own doing, and where was God while he schemed?
Distance from Laban's own flocks left Jacob free to work unwatched.
Because he was so far away, Jacob could carry out his cunning plan to make Laban's sheep bear striped, speckled or spotted lambs. He took fresh rods from trees and peeled strips of bark off them. Then he put them in front of the sheep when they came to drink (v. 38). At this time they mated, and the plan worked remarkably for Jacob: a very large number of striped, speckled or spotted lambs was born.
The word translated "troughs" means a plain piece of farm equipment:
rahat, water-trough for cattle. Gen. 30:38, 41.
Jacob owned that God was with him, yet he still managed every detail himself. One writer treats this passage as the clearest display of the man's character:
True, God was with Jacob — for nothing can hinder the outshining of divine grace. And Jacob in some measure acknowledges God's presence and faithfulness. Still, he can do nothing without a scheme and a plan. Jacob cannot let God settle the question of his wives and his wages, but tries to settle everything by his own cunning and management. In short, it is "the supplanter" throughout. Let the reader turn, for example, to Gen. 30:37-42, and ask where he could find a cleverer piece of cunning. Instead of letting God multiply the striped, speckled and spotted animals — which He certainly could have done, had He been trusted — Jacob set about securing their increase by a piece of policy that could only have come from the mind of a Jacob.
The hidden rods let the whole scheme wear the look of trust:
Laban surely had no idea what Jacob was doing. Jacob wanted him to think he was depending only on God to decide how many sheep he should have. How often it is true with us too, that we persuade ourselves we are walking by faith in God while using our own wits to help God out in supplying our needs!
Commentators differ on whether the peeled branches had any real effect on the flocks. Some doubt they did, and read the episode instead as a mirror of Jacob's inner life:
Some question whether Jacob's trickery in verses 37-39 made any real difference. But whether it did or not, there is a spiritual lesson here that should have spoken to Jacob himself. The things we let occupy our attention most will affect us and everything that comes from us. Jacob was letting his desire for gain take first place in his thoughts. This was bad for him spiritually, and it made him selfish and underhand in what he did. We can usually spot such principles in natural things, while missing what they mean in our spiritual lives.
Another writer allows the trick its part, but puts the result down to God's power:
God graciously stepped in for His injured servant. Even so, we could not imagine his father or his grandfather using such a trick as Jacob used to get the fruit of his long and patient service, which he had earned. Yet God stooped to use a means that, without His power, would have been useless, or at best only partly effective.
Laban had cheated Jacob for twenty years. The growing flocks are not just a clever man's winnings. God is settling a debt.
Divine providence paid Jacob in some five or six years the wages Laban had defrauded him of for twenty years.
The chapter is unflattering, and that is where its comfort lies.
It is in tracing out Jacob's real character, stage by stage of his extraordinary history, that one gets a wonderful view of divine grace. None but God could have borne with such a man, as none but God would have taken such a man up. Grace begins at the very lowest point. It takes up man as he is, and deals with him in full knowledge of what he is.
- Jacob's hand. He peeled rods and set them in the drinking troughs at breeding time — a plan he kept hidden from Laban.
- Jacob's name. The scheme is the supplanter being himself: he could not leave the matter of his wages with God.
- Jacob's mask. He looked like a man trusting God for his share. We do the same when we call it faith and use our own wits.
- God's hand. Commentators differ over whether the sticks changed anything. They agree the increase came from God. He repaid in a few years the wages Laban had withheld for twenty.
- God's grace. It began with Jacob at his lowest and took him up as he was — which is the only ground on which it takes anyone up.
And the flock was ardent before the rods; and the flock brought forth ringstraked, speckled, and spotted.
Jacob's wages were the marked lambs, and here the flocks mate at the troughs in front of his peeled rods. Commentators ask whether the rods did anything at all, and what the scheme shows about Jacob.
The bargain looked safe for Laban.
Since Laban's sheep were all a normal colour, it was not likely that many would be born for Jacob to claim. But being so far away, Jacob could now put his cunning plan into action. It would make Laban's sheep bear striped, speckled or spotted lambs. He took fresh rods from trees, peeled strips of bark off them, then set them in front of the sheep when they came to drink. At this time they mated. The plan worked very well for Jacob, because a great many striped, speckled or spotted lambs were born.
Bethel was where God had revealed Himself to Jacob. One writer weighs that against how Jacob then lived in Haran.
If you wanted to learn what God was, you should go to Bethel; if to learn what man was, you should go to Haran. But Jacob had failed to take in God's revelation of Himself at Bethel. So he went to Haran, and there showed what he was — and oh, what scrambling and scraping, what shuffling and shifting! There is no holy and elevated confidence in God, no simply looking to Him and waiting on Him... Jacob cannot let God settle the question of his wives and his wages. He tries to settle everything by his own cunning and management.
Another writer points to Jacob's name, and to Laban's earlier wrong.
The closing verses of this chapter reveal the device he used to increase his flocks at Laban's expense. We notice how true he still is to his name — meaning Supplanter... It was quite clear that in the past Laban had taken advantage of him. But to use counter-tricks to reverse the situation is the way of the world, not the way of God.
Later God Himself told Jacob what had increased his flocks. It was not the rods.
Jacob got his own back by cunning tricks connected with the breeding of Laban's cattle... So the contest went on until God stepped in again through a dream. He made known to Jacob that it was He, not Jacob's schemes, who caused the cattle to pass from Laban to him. And He called him out of the whole unpleasant business, back to Canaan.
So the scheming was not just wrong. It was needless.
This is no doubt true, but it shows us that there was no need for Jacob to resort to his deceitful actions. God would bless him apart from this.
Laban had cheated Jacob for years. One writer reads the outcome as God settling that account.
Laban's greed made him want to profit from Jacob's strange bargain. Instead it impoverished the self-absorbed master and brought new and growing wealth to the servant he had long defrauded. ... It was a righteous thing, as far as it could go in its way, to repay the wrongdoer and make up to the sufferer.
The same writer sets Jacob's trick beside his father and grandfather, and beside the power behind it.
God did step in with grace for His wronged servant. Even so, we could not imagine either his father or his grandfather using such a trick. Jacob used it to get the fruit of his long and patient service — what he had earned. Yet God stooped to use what, without His power, would have been — if not useless — at best very partial.
Jacob got everything he set out to get.
At last Jacob has reached the limit of his desire by deceit, trickery and fraud. Through it all, and despite it all, the unseen God has heard the desire of Jacob's heart and given him his fill. Yet in his own thinking he has done it all. God is little known or acknowledged. Jacob's hand, his planning and his fraud have gained everything; it is all his.
Commentators differ over whether the rods had any effect at all. The lesson does not depend on settling that.
Some question whether Jacob's trickery in verses 37-39 made any real difference. But whether it did or not, there is a spiritual lesson here that should have spoken deeply to Jacob himself. The things we allow to occupy our attention most will affect us and everything that comes from us. Jacob was letting his desire for gain take first place in his thoughts.
- Blessing first. God would have blessed Jacob without the rods. The trick tried to seize by management what God was ready to give.
- Character shows. In Haran Jacob proved true to his name, Supplanter: he schemed instead of waiting on God.
- God, not rods. A later dream told Jacob that God, not his tricks, moved the flocks from Laban to him.
- Justice served. The bargain stripped the greedy master and enriched the servant he had defrauded — a righteous repayment, as far as it went.
- Gain, no gratitude. Jacob ended rich and gave himself the credit. What fills our thoughts shapes all that comes out of us.
And Jacob separated the lambs, and set the faces of the flock toward the ringstraked, and all the brown in the flock of Laban; and he made himself separate flocks, and did not put them with Laban's flock.
Jacob is building his own herds out of the flock he tends for Laban. Is this the care of a man trusting God, or the cunning of a man managing his own blessing — and if it is cunning, why does he still come away rich?
The verse describes a deliberate breeding plan. Jacob keeps his own animals apart, then controls what the rest of the flock sees when they mate.
Jacob separated the lambs that he could claim for his own and kept all of his own apart from the flock of Laban (v. 40). Then, when the stronger sheep of Laban were mating, he would use his peeled rods in the watering troughs. He would not do this with the weaker sheep. So he was able to secure the stronger sheep, while Laban ended up with the weaker ones (vv. 41-42). No doubt Laban was not aware of what Jacob was doing, and Jacob wanted Laban to think that Jacob was only depending on God to decide how many sheep he should have. How often it is true with us too, that we persuade ourselves we are walking by faith in God while using our own wits to help God out in supplying our needs!
Nothing here is left in God's hands. One writer reads this section as the clearest self-portrait Jacob ever painted.
True, God was with Jacob — for nothing can stop the shining out of divine grace. Jacob even owns God's presence and faithfulness in a measure. Still, he can do nothing without a scheme and a plan. Jacob cannot allow God to settle the question of his wives and his wages, but tries to settle everything by his own cunning and management. In short, it is "the supplanter" all the way through. It is truly a perfect picture of Jacob. Instead of letting God multiply "the striped, speckled, and spotted cattle," as He certainly could have done had He been trusted, Jacob sets about multiplying them by a piece of policy that could only have come from the mind of a Jacob.
Jacob's problem was not that he despised what God had promised. He valued it — he just would not leave it with God. And the way he got it came back on him in the same coin.
As to Jacob's character, he was most certainly a believer, and what is more, a believer who valued God's promises… But we do not find in Jacob this character of faith — confidence in God to bring about the promises. So while he values the promises, he uses fleshly means to obtain them; he counts on human policy instead of counting on God. There is blessing in the end. But God could not approve his conduct. In His governmental dealing with Jacob, God measures back to him the measure he has used; Jacob himself is continually the object of the same kind of deceit.
Jacob had earned those wages over years of hard service. But the way he took them sets him apart from the men before him in his family.
Here God graciously stepped in for His wronged servant. Even so, we could not imagine either his father or his grandfather using such a device as Jacob used to get the fruit of his long and patient service, which he had earned. Yet God condescended to use what, without His power, would have been — if not useless — very limited.
The chapter ends with Jacob a wealthy man. The problem is not the wealth. It is that he got what he longed for and never noticed whose hand had given it.
At last Jacob has reached the furthest limit of his desire by deceit, trickery and fraud. Through it all, and despite it all, the unseen God has heard the desire of Jacob's heart and given him his fill. Yet in his own thinking he has done it all — God little known or acknowledged. Jacob's hand, and thought, and fraud have gained it all; it is all his.
This unflattering story is not here to shame Jacob. It shows what God is like with people who are still this small.
Trace out Jacob's real character, stage by stage of his extraordinary history, and you get a wonderful view of divine grace. None but God could have put up with such a man, as none but God would have taken up such a man. Grace begins at the very lowest point. It takes up man as he is, and deals with him in full knowledge of what he is.
- Method — Jacob keeps his own animals apart and breeds from the strong. Laban ends up with the weak flock and never sees the plan.
- Mask — he wants Laban to think he is leaving the outcome to God. We do the same when we call our own scheming "walking by faith."
- Motive — he is a real believer who values the promises. But he does not trust God to deliver them, so he reaches for human policy.
- Mirror — God measures back to him the measure he used; the same deceit meets him again and again.
- Mercy — God stoops to use a device Jacob's father and grandfather would never have touched. Grace begins at the lowest point and takes a man as he is.
And it came to pass whensoever the strong cattle were ardent, that Jacob laid the rods before the eyes of the flock in the gutters, that they might become ardent among the rods;
Jacob's years with Laban end with a breeding trick: he set peeled rods before the flock when the strong animals were mating, and kept them back from the weak. Was this faith, cunning, or God at work through a man who had not yet learned to wait?
A reference work gives the word behind "troughs":
rahat, water-trough for cattle. Genesis 30:38, 41.
The timing of the rods is the whole point. Jacob used them on one kind of animal and not the other:
Jacob separated the lambs he could claim as his own and kept them apart from Laban's flock (v. 40). Then, when Laban's stronger sheep were mating, he would use his peeled rods in the watering troughs. He would not do this with the weaker sheep. So he secured the stronger sheep, and the weaker ones went to Laban (vv. 41-42).
Jacob's cleverness sits beside a real sense that God was with him:
True, God was with Jacob — for nothing can stop divine grace from shining out. Jacob also owns God's presence and faithfulness in some measure. Still, he can do nothing without a scheme and a plan. Jacob cannot let God settle the question of his wives and his wages. He tries to settle it all by his own cunning and management. In short, he is "the supplanter" all through. Turn to Genesis 30:37-42, and say where you can find a more skilful piece of cunning. It is truly a perfect picture of Jacob.
Commentators differ on how much the rods achieved. The lesson stands either way:
Some question whether Jacob's trickery in verses 37-39 made any real difference. But whether it did or not, there is a spiritual lesson here that should have spoken to Jacob himself. Whatever we allow to occupy our attention most will affect us and everything that comes from us. Jacob was letting his desire for gain take first place in his thoughts. This was bad for him spiritually, and made him selfish and underhand in his actions. But we can usually recognize such principles in natural things, while not seeing what they mean in our spiritual lives.
From the outside, the arrangement looked like trust:
No doubt Laban did not know what Jacob was doing. And Jacob wanted him to think that he was only depending on God to decide how many sheep he should have. How often it is true with us too, that we persuade ourselves we are walking by faith in God while using our own wits to help God out in supplying our needs!
Looking back, the increase traces to God and not to the rods:
We are now allowed to see how God had stepped in and made the agreement about the spotted and speckled cattle work in Jacob's favour. In the light of this, our thought would be this. If he had rested with confidence in God, and had not used the tricks described in the last chapter, God would still have reached the end He purposed. And Jacob's "righteousness" would have spoken for him far more convincingly.
The repayment, when it came, was swift:
Divine providence paid Jacob in about five or six years the wages that Laban had cheated him out of for twenty years.
The tragedy is not that Jacob failed to prosper. It is that he walked away thinking the prosperity was his own achievement:
At last Jacob has reached the furthest limit of his desire, by deceit, trickery, and fraud. Through it all, and despite it all, the unseen God has heard the desire of Jacob's heart and granted it in full. Yet in his own mind he has done it all himself — God is hardly known or acknowledged. Jacob's hand, his thinking, and his fraud have gained it all; it is all his.
Yet this is where grace shows itself:
No one but God could have put up with such a man, and no one but God would have taken up such a man. Grace begins at the very lowest point. It takes up man as he is, and deals with him in the full intelligence of what he is.
- The trough. Jacob put his peeled rods in the water troughs only when the strong animals were mating. He kept them back from the weak. The best of the flock became his.
- The scheme. Jacob owned God's presence in some measure. Yet he could not let God settle his wages; he had to have a plan of his own.
- The disguise. He arranged things so Laban would think he was leaving it all to God. We do the same when we call our own wits "walking by faith."
- The real hand. God was the one who made the flocks increase. He repaid in five or six years what Laban had cheated Jacob of over twenty.
- The grace. Jacob thought he had gained it all himself. God took up such a man anyway, and bore with him. Grace begins at the very lowest point.
but when the sheep were feeble, he put [them] not in; so the feeble were Laban's, and the strong Jacob's.
Genesis 30 ends with Jacob's flocks growing fast, and verse 42 gives the fine print of his method: he used the peeled rods for the strong animals only. So the chapter leaves one question open — did his wealth come from his own cleverness, or from God?
The verse describes a filter, not just a trick. Jacob timed his device so that the vigorous animals bred under it and the feeble ones did not, and he drew a lesson for himself in the process:
Jacob separated the lambs that he could claim as his own and kept them apart from Laban's flock. Then, when Laban's stronger sheep were mating, he would use his peeled rods in the watering troughs. He would not do this with the weaker sheep. So he secured the stronger sheep, and Laban kept the weaker ones. No doubt Laban did not know what Jacob was doing. Jacob wanted Laban to think he was only depending on God to decide how many sheep he should have. How often the same thing is true of us! We persuade ourselves that we are walking by faith in God, while we use our own wits to help God out in supplying our needs.
One writer finds in these verses a portrait of Jacob the supplanter — the man who gets ahead by pushing others aside:
True, God was with Jacob — for nothing can hinder the outshining of divine grace. Jacob does, up to a point, acknowledge God's presence and faithfulness. Still nothing can be done without a scheme and a plan. Jacob cannot allow God to settle the question of his wives and his wages, but seeks to settle everything by his own cunning and management. In short, it is "the supplanter" throughout. Let the reader turn to Genesis 30:37-42 and say where he could find a more skilful piece of cunning.
Jacob had told Laban that his honesty would speak for him later. The irony is that the outcome he engineered was already on its way without him:
In the light of this our reflection would be that if he had rested with confidence in God, and not used the devices described in the last chapter, the end God purposed would have been reached, and his "righteousness" would have answered for him in a much more convincing way.
Later God gave Jacob the real explanation for his growing flocks, and it came in a dream:
Laban, according to Jacob's complaint, changed his wages ten times. Jacob got his own back by cunning tricks connected with the breeding of Laban's cattle. Laban's sons complained that he had "taken all that was our father's." So the contest went on until God stepped in again in a dream. He made known to Jacob that it was He, rather than Jacob's schemes, who caused the cattle to pass from Laban to him. And He called him out of the whole unpleasant business back to Canaan.
The transfer of the strong animals also settles an old account. Laban had defrauded Jacob for years, and his own greed became the instrument that drained him:
Laban's greedy desire to profit by Jacob's strange bargain made the self-absorbed master poor. It brought new and growing wealth to the servant he had cheated for so long. It was a righteous thing, as far as it could go, to repay the wrongdoer and make up to the man who suffered. And one cannot fail to notice how fitting such a dealing from God was toward the one of Israel's fathers who, more than any other, pictures the chosen people. Israel took its name from him. Their ups and downs were like his own endless changes, failures and humiliations. At the end, divine mercy would turn all of it into everlasting blessing at the feet of their long rejected Messiah.
One writer draws a lesson for Jacob, and for us, from the sheep in front of the rods:
The sheep in front of the rods seem to show how "the eye affects the heart." Whatever object we keep before us shapes us, and shapes everything that comes from us. So the Lord connects the "eye" and the "master" (Matthew 6:19-25). Our object is what controls us, and in a world like this, how many objects compete to take hold of us! So if our mind is set on things above, the marks of a "life hidden with Christ in God" take shape in us (Colossians 3:1-3).
The story does not leave us admiring Jacob. It shows what God was toward a man like him:
This is a true picture, so far as Jacob was concerned. But it only gives us one side, and that the gloomy side. Blessed be God, there is a bright side too, for God had to do with Jacob. In every scene of his life, when Jacob was called to reap the fruits of his own plotting and crookedness, the God of Jacob brought good out of evil. He caused His grace to abound over all the sin and folly of His poor servant.
- Craft. Jacob used the rods only when the strong animals bred, so the vigorous stock went to him and the feeble to Laban.
- Cover. He looked like a man leaving the outcome to God, while his own wits were steering it.
- Cause. God later told him in a dream that the flocks moved from Laban to him by His hand, not by his schemes.
- Cost. Laban's greed drained him — a righteous repayment for the wrongdoer and relief for the man he had cheated.
- Grace. He reaped the fruits of his own crookedness, and still God brought good out of evil in every scene of his life.