Genesis 27:32–33

Genesis 27:32 · Darby

And Isaac his father said to him, Who art thou? And he said, I am thy son, thy firstborn, Esau.

Isaac is dying, and Jacob has already come in his brother's place and taken the blessing. Now Esau stands at the bedside and answers his father's question with the very title he had sold.

A claim already sold

One writer stresses that Esau had every advantage and no excuse.

But Esau was all the more guilty. He was born of the heir of promise, in answer to prayer and in line with prophecy. Being born first gave him whatever advantage it could over Jacob. Was he not brought up just as much as Jacob, within the familiar sound of God's word and ways, as far as we know? But he was tested in a way that should have been easy for a hunter. He had resources at hand which had never failed, and which it would be monstrous to think could fail him in urgent need. Yet he deliberately sold his own birthright "for a single meal" (Heb. 12:16), and so earned from the Holy Spirit the terrible stigma of a "profane person."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Too late

Esau came back expecting the blessing to be waiting for him.

But he found that it was he who was too late. Isaac was shocked when Esau told him who he was (vv. 32-33). At first he asks who had already come, but of course he knew the answer. He tells Esau he has blessed the first one who came, and adds firmly that "he shall be blessed." In this way God had overruled Jacob's inexcusable deceit, so that the blessing went to the younger son, as God had decreed.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Isaac taken out of his own hand

Isaac had his own wish for this moment. One writer says that even a man God has set apart still acts from his own heart.

Though a set-apart and filled vessel, he would have served the wish of his own fond heart in the use of the treasure he carried; but God took him out of his own hand, and used him as the oracle of His settled, sovereign purpose... We know that "that which is born of the flesh is flesh." As an old writer says, "The water that is foul in the well will not be clean in the bucket."

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The purpose that never needed the scheming

Rebekah schemed and Jacob lied. One writer points out that none of it was needed.

But God's purpose must stand, and He will do all His pleasure. Faith knows this, and in the power of that knowledge can wait for God's time. Nature never can do this, but must set about gaining its own ends by its own inventions. These are the two great points brought out in Jacob's history. On one side stands God's purpose of grace. On the other stands nature, plotting and scheming to reach what that purpose would have brought about without fail, with no plot or scheme at all... God did not need the help of Rebekah's cunning and Jacob's gross deceit to carry out His purpose.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Wanting the blessing without the change

Esau did want the blessing back. One writer asks what he was after, and sets him beside the prophet Balaam.

How a single act may reveal a man's character, as with Esau here. For a bit of food he sold his birthright, and the act marked him as a profane person, one who habitually left God out of his thoughts. Yet he could desire the blessing, and sought it earnestly after he had lost it — just as Balaam could want to die the death of the righteous while he had no thought of living their life. So he found no place for repentance, because it had to do only with the lost blessing, and involved no judgment of his ways before God. He valued the gain of godliness without the godliness.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The warning in the scene

One writer applies Esau's closed door to anyone who drifts away from Christ.

I do not care what you take up in His place; if you slip away from Christ you may be tomorrow in the position of the rejected Esau. He is a picture of those who will one day cry to be let in. Their tears will be as useless as Esau's beside the bed of his dying father. He came too late. So when once God has risen up and shut the door they will find no place of repentance.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Sold. Esau claims the title "firstborn." He had already sold that birthright for a single meal, and the act marked him as profane.

- Late. Esau comes with the food and the claim too late. Isaac had already blessed his brother, and says of him, "he shall be blessed."

- Overruled. Isaac meant the blessing for Esau. God took him out of his own hand, and made him speak His settled purpose instead.

- Unnecessary. God's purpose would have stood without Rebekah's cunning or Jacob's lies. Faith waits for God's time. Nature schemes for what it would have received anyway.

- Warning. Esau wanted the blessing back, not repentance. Tears over a lost gift are not a change of heart, and the door does not stay open forever.

Genesis 27:33 · Darby

Then Isaac trembled with exceeding great trembling, and said, Who was he, then, that hunted venison and brought [it] to me? And I have eaten of all before thou camest, and have blessed him; also blessed he shall be.

Esau comes back with his father's meal, but the blessing is already gone. Isaac had meant it for him all along. What made the old man shake so hard? And why did he seal the blessing on the son who had tricked him instead of taking it back?

Why Isaac Trembled

Isaac was not just shocked at being fooled. One writer names what he thinks lay behind the trembling.

I have no doubt that the thought of God's coming in to thwart his flesh had much to do with Isaac's trembling.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer follows what happened inside Isaac at that moment.

His eye is opened. He discovers what he had been doing, and how Jacob had got the blessing he had prepared for Esau. It confronts him to his face: he had been resisting God, and could not win. His soul seems to wake as from sleep. The moral sense of the place he was filling startles him. He trembles inside. The flesh he had been feeding could not support him at such a moment.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

How the Deception Succeeded

Isaac's blindness was more than physical. One writer asks how so weak a trick worked, and answers from the state of Isaac's soul.

How did such a clumsy trick deceive Isaac? He knew the voice. Were the neck and wrists, covered with the skin of a young goat, a surer test than the voice? The trick fooled Isaac as it would never have fooled a man of the world with common sense. How did that happen? He was not in communion with God, and the crudest means can deceive a believer who is out of communion. His thoughts were fleshly; his soul loved venison, and the tasty food blinded his mind.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Discipline Through the Thing He Loved

God did not leave Isaac's appetite alone. One writer traces what God did with it.

But God will subdue nature, unjudged nature, in Isaac too. And more than this — so perfect and complete are God's ways! That very indulgence had twisted Isaac's mind and judgement. God will use it as the direct instrument to discipline him. God allows him to be deceived. The tasty food turned his mind away from sound judgement, and the same tasty food forces him, without knowing it, to act according to the will of God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Words That Seal the Blessing

Isaac's response is the surprise of the chapter. He confirms the blessing he has already given. One writer marks this as the turning point.

But we rejoice at the turning point of grace in Isaac's soul. He bowed to God's overturning of his effort to please the son who had catered to his appetite. He had forgotten the already declared will of the Lord about Jacob. When God's overruling broke in on him, he did not attack his wife and younger son. He bowed in self-judgment and trembled with a very great trembling. In faith he sealed what his lips had said without knowing, yet under God: "Yes, and he shall be blessed." He felt that, however others were to blame, the error was his own. God was only securing now what He had said before the sons were born. Faith now worked, no longer hindered by the flesh which had lately darkened his eyes. And so says the Spirit in Hebrews 11. It was not in line with his natural leanings, but against them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why should a blessing won by lying stand? Writers do not excuse Jacob.

Jacob deserved to lose the blessing. By his mean, lying conduct he forfeited the place given by promise. Where would he have been, and the nation named after him, if grace had not covered his sin at the very start?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Esau's Loss Confirmed

Isaac's words also settle Esau's case. One writer weighs the loud, bitter cry that follows.

Esau sold his birthright for a bowl of stew. He despised it. Present ease and relief were everything to him at that moment... Though he longed for his father's blessing, seeking it with tears, he could never regain what he had lost. He had forfeited it, and Isaac acknowledged that when he said of Jacob, "Yes, and he shall be blessed." ... But there was no word of confession of what he had done. He showed no penitent spirit.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Appetite blinds. Isaac's love of a favourite meal, not old age, left him open to a trick a stranger would have spotted. The crudest means can fool a believer who is out of fellowship with God.

- God thwarts. Isaac shook when he saw that he had been resisting God's declared will — and had lost.

- Discipline fits. The same indulgence that misled him became the instrument God used to correct him and to carry out His purpose despite him.

- Faith seals. Isaac blamed no one else. He judged himself and confirmed the blessing — the act Hebrews 11 records as his faith.

- Tears are not repentance. Esau's bitter cry begged for the lost blessing. It confessed nothing about the birthright he had despised.