And Abraham departed thence towards the south country, and dwelt between Kadesh and Shur, and sojourned at Gerar.
Abraham leaves the place where he had prayed for Sodom and settles as a stranger in Gerar, a Philistine town. The verse reads like a travel note, but commentators see in it the first step of the fall that follows.
Just before this, Abraham had prayed before the Lord for Sodom. One writer links what follows to the ground he left behind.
Yet a marked season of favour and blessing may come just before a great humiliation through carelessness and sin. So it was now with Abraham, as he lived as a stranger in the land of the Philistines. Was it that he too, like Lot, was afraid to stay under the shield of the Almighty after seeing the recent judgments? What is certain is that he travelled away from the place where he once stood before the Lord in intercession. From that same place, a little later, he had looked with awe at the ruined plain, where the smoke of the country went up like the smoke of a furnace.
The verse says Abraham "sojourned" in Gerar. One writer shows why that word is not the same as settling down.
Following all this comes the very important and characteristic word "sojourn" (Genesis 20:1). It means day-staying, in contrast to "dwelling," which is permanent. Both words occur often throughout the Old and New Testaments, carrying important principles. So Peter urges believers, as sojourners and pilgrims, to abstain from the passions of the flesh, and to spend the time of their sojourning here in fear. They are to be only travellers in this world. They must not make it their home or dwelling place. On the other hand, these pilgrims dwell in God, and His word dwells in them, and His Spirit dwells in them.
One writer reads the verse by what each place name means.
He journeyed toward the south, which is typical of pleasant circumstances, but nearly always having danger in it. He dwelt between Kadesh and Shur. Kadesh means "set apart for a purpose," which beautifully describes God's work with Abraham, and is true of all Christians too. But Shur means "point of observation." Does this not tell us something? We know we are set apart for God, yet we sometimes look the other way to see what others may be doing.
The name of the town he moved into carries a warning too.
Is it surprising that after this he lived as a stranger in Gerar? Gerar, a Philistine city, means "dragging away." If our own observation leads us, we are always likely to be dragged away from the place of devoted separation to God.
Years earlier Abraham had gone down to Egypt. One writer compares the two places while commenting on Isaac's later visit to Gerar.
There is an obvious difference between Egypt and Gerar. Egypt expresses the world in its natural resources and its independence of God... Egypt lay further from Canaan than Gerar, and in moral terms it pictures a soul further from God... So Gerar was a step forward from Egypt. But it still lay within reach of very dangerous influences. Abraham got into trouble there, and so does Isaac in this chapter, and in exactly the same way.
One writer explains how a fault can stay out of sight for years.
It is remarkable to watch Abraham coming up out of Egypt — building an altar and pitching a tent... entertaining the heavenly visitors and interceding for his brother Lot. He passed through such brilliant scenes over a series of years. All that time this moral point, in which he had erred at the very start of his course, remained unsettled in his heart. True, it did not show itself during that period, but why not? Because Abraham was not in circumstances that called it out — yet it was there all the same.
Another writer looks past the personal failure to what the enemy was aiming at.
Then, under the stress of famine, he had turned aside from the land and slipped into Egypt. Here, without any such trying circumstances, but simply from fear of man, he denies the one through whom God had definitely assured him the promised heir would come. In one case he gives up the testimony of the inheritance; in the other he clouds the testimony to the heir. Then, as now, behind every failure of the people of God the enemy is attacking some great truth connected with their calling.
- Step — Abraham leaves the place where he had stood before the Lord in prayer. A high season of favour can come just before a deep fall.
- Stranger — "Sojourn" means day-staying, not dwelling. Believers travel through this world; God, His word and His Spirit dwell in them.
- Drift — He camps between Kadesh ("set apart") and Shur ("point of observation"), then ends up in Gerar ("dragging away"). Watching others drags you out of separation to God.
- Border — Gerar stands nearer to God than Egypt, yet still within reach of dangerous influences. Abraham and Isaac both fell there in the same way.
- Root — A weak point can lie unsettled through years of brilliant service until circumstances touch it. Through it the enemy attacks a great truth of our calling.
And Abraham said of Sarah his wife, She is my sister. And Abimelech the king of Gerar sent and took Sarah.
Abraham has just stood before the Lord pleading for Sodom. Now he lives as a stranger in Gerar, calls his wife his sister, and a king takes her. How could a man of such faith fall this way? And what does God do with His promise when the man who carries it fails?
This is not a new sin but an old one coming back.
Long before this, the pinch of famine led him to travel south, even into Egypt, and to stay there. Now he lives between Kadesh and Shur, and stays in Gerar; and now, as then, he denies his true relationship to his wife. "She is my sister," Abraham says of Sarah among the Philistines, just as at an earlier day he told her to say so among the Egyptians.
The repetition makes it worse, not more excusable.
Again, Abraham himself tells Abimelech, king of Gerar, that Sarah is his sister — a lie blacker than the first. It was meant to hide the fact that she was his wife. He should have learned the lesson of his earlier failure of the same kind.
The failure begins in a calculation about the people around him.
Abraham again shows the dread of circumstances that the heart knows so well. He stays in Gerar, and fears the men of that place. Judging that God was not there, he forgets that He is always with him. He seems more taken up with the men of Gerar than with the One who was stronger than they. Forgetting God's ability to protect his wife, he falls back on the same trick he had used years before in Egypt.
God had already told Abraham the name he was to trust.
God said to Abraham, "I am God Almighty; walk before me, and be blameless" (Gen. 17:1) — which means that he was to walk before God, always trusting in His almighty power. Abraham did not do so; he failed in this respect, for he told a lie (Gen. 20:2), precisely because he did not trust God's almighty power.
Faith and honesty about who we belong to go together.
When a Christian fails to walk by faith, he will always give the wrong impression about his true relationships. Let us not be afraid or ashamed to show that we belong to the Lord Jesus, and are therefore set apart to please Him.
The timing sharpens everything. Sarah was on the edge of bearing the promised son.
This time it was even more serious, for Sarah was just about to bear the child of promise. Abraham's failure might have compromised what God had promised and was about to perform. So God took what we may call drastic action to protect Sarah. He did not deal with Abraham, who had failed, but with the foreign king.
God corrects Abraham without withdrawing the place He had given him.
God made known in a dream how matters really stood, that he must not touch the man's wife. "He is a prophet, and he shall pray for you" — a most instructive example of the way God holds to His principles. He will still honour Abraham in front of Abimelech, even while He disciplines him. Abimelech might well ask, "How can Abraham be a prophet — a man who tells lies in denying his own wife?" Still, God said, "he is a prophet." … The Bible has recorded the sin of the father of the faithful for the good of all the children.
The difference between this fall and the first one is what happened afterwards.
When Abraham fell into the same error in Egypt, we do not find that Pharaoh's reproof produced any visible effect. He left Egypt, but the root of evil stayed in his heart, ready to send out its harmful branches again. It is not so here. Here we get at once to the root of the matter — Abraham opens up his whole heart. He confesses that he had kept this thing in his heart from the very first moment of his journey. Twice it had betrayed him into an act that would not bear the light. He fully confesses the evil, and he fully renounces it — he is rid of it, root and branch. He listens to Abimelech's reproof and profits by it. It was God's instrument. Through it He brought the matter out and delivered the soul of His servant from the power of evil.
- Root — this was not a fresh slip. It was an old plan, kept in his heart from the start of his journey, and it grew a second time.
- Fear — he judged that God was not in Gerar. Forgetting God's power to protect turned a man of faith into a schemer.
- Denial — losing sight of God, he hid his closest relationship. Unbelief still gives the world the wrong impression of who we belong to.
- Protection — the promised child was near, so God stepped in for Sarah. He dealt with the king, not with the man who had failed.
- Recovery — God used an outsider's rebuke to draw out full confession and pull up the root. He still called His failing servant a prophet.
But God came to Abimelech in a dream by night, and said to him, Behold, thou art [but] a dead man, because of the woman that thou hast taken; for she is a man's wife.
Abraham had moved to Gerar and passed his wife off as his sister, and King Abimelech took her. That night God spoke in a dream — to the foreign king, not to His own failing servant.
Before there was any written Scripture, God spoke to people one by one. He did this even with people who knew little about Him.
In the days of the patriarchs, we may say that the only revelation of God was what He gave to each person. God made His mind known this way to Noah, to Abraham, and even to those who knew little of Him, such as Abimelech and Laban. A dream or vision was often used, but it was a divine revelation… The same truth holds even more fully now. We do not need revelation by dreams and visions. We have it in the written word of God.
The reason God gives is that the woman belongs to a husband. No law had been written down yet, but God still holds a foreign king to the marriage bond.
Marriage was God's provision for His creatures. He set it up before the Fall and kept it after the Fall. Before the law He upheld it as something no one may break (Gen. 12:17; 20:3). Under the law He guarded it with clear commands (Ex. 20:14, 17). The Lord confirmed its sanctity again (Matt. 19:3-9). And the New Testament declares it honourable for all (Heb. 13:4).
Abimelech hears the words as a threat of execution and protests that his nation is innocent. But the words describe where he already stood. They were not a sentence God had passed.
Abimelech had Sarah in his house, but he had not come near her. So he protests to the Lord: would He kill a nation that was blameless? The Lord had not said He would kill the nation, or even Abimelech. He said that Abimelech's condition was one of virtual death, because he had Sarah in his house.
Abraham had used this trick before in Egypt. This time Sarah was about to bear the promised son, so his failure put God's own word at risk.
He moved to Gerar and before Abimelech the king he used the same trick he had used years before in Egypt. This time it was even more serious, for Sarah was just about to bear the child of promise. Abraham's failure might have compromised what God had promised and was about to perform. So God took what we may call drastic action to protect Sarah, not dealing with Abraham who had failed, but with the heathen king.
God says nothing to Abraham here. He lets the rebuke reach him through the man he wronged.
God stepped in again in mercy. This time it was not by plagues, as He did with Pharaoh, but by speaking to Abimelech in a dream… Why did God not reprove Abraham Himself? Was it not because Abimelech's rebuke would make him feel ashamed before the man he had wronged?
Abraham is in the wrong, yet God moves against the king on his behalf.
In the case of Abraham and Abimelech, it was divine care over one He had called out to walk before Him. "He rebuked kings on their account, saying, 'Touch not my anointed ones, do my prophets no harm!'" (Ps. 105:15). God cares for those He calls to walk before Him. Abimelech had taken a member of Abraham's family by tyrannical power. God shows that no one can touch His people on earth and go unpunished.
Abraham lied, and God still calls him a prophet who can pray for the king.
However great their failure, God does not give up His people. He will never throw away His pearls because of some grit that clings to them… God tells Abimelech that the very man who had so wronged him stands so near to Him that he can pray for him. Despite his failure, he is a prophet, and one who prays to God for others, and God does not withdraw these high privileges because of his failures.
- Warning — God comes at night to a king who hardly knows Him. He can make His mind known to anyone.
- Reason — the woman has a husband. God held marriage binding long before any law was written down.
- Danger — "a dead man" describes where Abimelech already stood while Sarah was under his roof. It was not a sentence God had passed.
- Protection — Sarah was about to bear the child of promise. God acted to guard what His servant's failure had put at risk.
- Grace — God rebukes a king for Abraham's sake. He still calls Abraham a prophet who can pray for others. Failure does not cancel that place.
But Abimelech had not come near her. And he said, Lord, wilt thou also kill a righteous nation?
A king takes a woman into his household, and that same night God tells him he is a dead man. The king answers that he never touched her, and pleads for a people he calls innocent — but does a clean record before people settle anything before God?
Commentators point out that Abimelech is answering a threat God never made.
Abimelech had Sarah in his house, but he had not come near her. So he protests to the Lord: would He kill a nation that was blameless? The Lord had not said He would kill the nation, or even Abimelech. He said that Abimelech was as good as dead because he had Sarah in his house — even though, as Abimelech said, both Abraham and Sarah had deceived the Philistines.
Abimelech does not plead for himself alone. God does not brush the plea aside — but it does not change Abraham's place.
The Philistine king, though, could plead that his heart was sincere and his hands were clean. He counted his people as one with himself. "Lord, will you kill an innocent people?" Abraham and Sarah were both guilty of deceit. Yet note this: God allowed the plea, showing that He had kept the king from actual sin. Even so, He maintains the special place Abraham held.
A clear conscience does not cancel the sentence God has already spoken. The better-behaved man ends up in debt to the man who deceived him.
Yes, with all "the integrity of his heart and the innocence of his hands," the king of Gerar was "but a dead man." What is more, he had to depend on the prayers of that erring and inconsistent stranger to get his household's health restored.
The timing explains why God acted so sharply. Writers point out what Sarah was about to bear, and whom God dealt with.
In Genesis 20 we get a glimpse of Abraham on a much lower level than he was in Genesis 18. He moved to Gerar, and before Abimelech the king he used the same trick he had used years before in Egypt. This time it was even more serious, for Sarah was just about to bear the child of promise. Abraham's failure might have put at risk what God had promised and was about to do. So God took what we may call drastic action to protect Sarah. He did not deal with Abraham, who had failed, but with the heathen king.
Commentators differ over how much blame Abimelech carries. Some allow his plea of innocence. Others call his taking of Sarah an act of tyrannical power. On God's reason for acting they agree.
With Abraham and Abimelech, God was not displaying justice. He was showing divine care over one He had called out to walk before Him. "He rebuked kings on their account, saying, 'Touch not my anointed ones, do my prophets no harm'" (Psalm 105:14-15). God cares for those He calls to walk before Him. Abimelech had recklessly used tyrannical power to take a member of Abraham's family. God shows that no one can touch His people on earth without consequence.
- Failure first. Abraham repeats an old trick at the worst moment, just as the promised child is due. The trouble starts with the believer, not the king.
- Danger named. God's word to Abimelech was no threat to wipe out a nation. It said that a man holding another man's wife is already as good as dead.
- Plea heard. God allows Abimelech's appeal to a clear conscience, made for his people as well as himself. He had kept the king from actual sin.
- Plea not enough. Integrity of heart and clean hands still leave him "a dead man." He needs the prayers of the very man who wronged him.
- Care decides. God is not weighing which man behaved better. He guards the man He called, and rebukes kings so that no one touches His people without consequence.
Did he not say to me, She is my sister? and she, even she said, He is my brother. In the integrity of my heart and in the innocency of my hands have I done this.
Abimelech, king of Gerar, has taken Sarah into his house and God has told him in a dream that he is a dead man. He pleads a clear conscience: both Abraham and Sarah had told him the same story — so is an honest heart the same as safety before God?
Abimelech can quote both Abraham and Sarah back to God. Neither of them had said anything false, and that is what makes the deception so slippery.
With the fear of man before him, Abraham loses faith in God. Failing in faith, he falls back on his own resources and acts with the deceit of the flesh. He says of Sarah, his wife, "She is my sister." He tells the truth to hide the truth. Once again he exposes his wife to shame to save his own life.
The king's moral sense in this scene looks finer than the believer's. Yet God had already called him a dead man before he opened his mouth to plead.
In this scene the man of the world seemed, for the moment, to have a finer moral sense than the man of God… But notice how God enters the scene to vindicate His servant. He says to Abimelech, "Behold, you are but a dead man." Yes, with all "the integrity of his heart and innocence of his hands" — with all his fine moral sense of right and wrong, he was "but a dead man." It only had to become, for one moment, a question between him and even an erring child of God. In His grace, God was looking at His dear servant from a completely different point of view than Abimelech's. All Abimelech could see in Abraham was a man guilty of an obvious piece of deception. God saw more than that.
Abimelech's protest is not brushed aside. God's answer deals with both men at once.
But the Philistine king could plead the sincerity of his heart and the innocence of his hands. He counted his people as one with himself. "Lord, will You slay also a righteous nation?" Abraham and Sarah were both guilty of deceit. Yet notice this. God allowed the plea, showing that He had kept the king from actual sin. At the same time He kept Abraham in the special place where he stood.
God Himself had kept the king from touching Sarah. That mercy, though, is not a licence.
It was true enough that Abimelech had not done wrong in the way he treated Sarah, and God acknowledges this to him. But God adds that He Himself had kept Abimelech from sinning against Him, by not letting him touch Sarah. How gracious our God and Father is! He protects us even when we put ourselves in compromising positions. Yet this is no excuse for our failure, and we must not dare to count on God's protection when we deliberately do wrong.
Abraham was a prophet and could pray for others. That standing did not soften what he had done to a man who had wronged nobody.
Still, the privileges of being a prophet and an intercessor only increase the evil of his deceit. The world is quick to notice this. At once Abimelech calls Abraham and challenges him about what he has done. Abimelech is right when he says plainly, "You have done deeds to me that ought not to be done." Abraham had failed in faith in God. He had wronged his wife. On top of that, he had wronged the man of the world. Abraham had sunk, not only beneath the height of his calling, but beneath the conduct of a decent man of the world.
- Half-truth. Abraham told the truth to hide the truth. Abimelech now repeats that half-truth back to God as his defence.
- Integrity. A man can act with a whole heart and clean hands and still stand condemned. His fine moral sense left him "but a dead man."
- Allowed. God does not dismiss the plea. He grants it, and tells the king that He Himself had kept him from actual sin. Even so, Abraham keeps his place as prophet and intercessor.
- Protected. God guards His people even in trouble their own unbelief created. That is grace, not permission to presume on it.
- Exposed. A believer can sink below the conduct of a decent outsider. The world is quick to notice when he does.
And God said to him in a dream, I also knew that thou didst this in the integrity of thy heart, and I, too, have withheld thee from sinning against me therefore have I not suffered thee to touch her.
Abraham has moved to Gerar and called his wife his sister. King Abimelech has taken Sarah into his house, and God speaks to him in a dream at night. God's answer is startling. He grants the king a clear conscience, but He claims the clean hands as His own work.
God agrees with Abimelech's protest and then adds something the king did not know. The restraint he thought was his own turns out to have been God's work in him.
It was true that Abimelech had done no wrong in the way he treated Sarah, and God says so to him. But God adds that He Himself had kept Abimelech from sinning against Him, by not letting him touch Sarah (v. 6). How gracious our God and Father is! He protects us even when we put ourselves in compromising positions. Yet this is no excuse for our failure. We must never dare to count on God's protection when we choose to do wrong.
The timing explains how strongly God acted. Sarah was about to bear the promised son, so Abraham's lie put God's own promise at risk.
In Genesis 20 we see Abraham on a much lower level than he was in Genesis 18. He moved to Gerar, and before Abimelech the king he used the same trick he had used years before in Egypt. This time it was even more serious, for Sarah was just about to bear the child of promise. Abraham's failure could have put at risk what God had promised and was about to do. So God took what we may call drastic action to protect Sarah. He did not deal with Abraham, who had failed, but with the pagan king.
Writers trace this episode back to a longer campaign. Sarah in a foreign king's house was not a random misfortune; it was one of several attempts to mix the chosen family into the nations and so stop the promised Seed from coming.
Apart from a faint hint in "Blessed be the Lord God of Shem," nothing showed which line the promised seed would come through. Then Abram was called, and Satan fixed his eye on him at once. On three different occasions Satan tried to swamp the separated line with the nations outside. Twice Sarah was put at risk: first in the house of Pharaoh (Gen. 12:14), then in the house of Abimelech (Gen. 20). His third try, with the same aim, was with Rebekah (Gen. 26)... All this was to prevent the coming of the true Seed.
The chapter puts two men side by side. God's verdict on each reverses what anyone watching would expect.
So in Abraham's case, he might lower himself in the eyes of Abimelech, king of Gerar, and Abimelech might have to rebuke him. Yet when God comes to deal with the case, He says to Abimelech, "Behold, you are but a dead man"; and of Abraham He says, "He is a prophet, and he shall pray for you." Yes, with all "the integrity of his heart, and the innocence of his hands," the king of Gerar was "but a dead man." What is more, he had to depend on the prayers of this failing, inconsistent stranger to get his household well again. This is God's way. He may have many a private dispute with His child about his practical ways. But as soon as the enemy brings a charge against him, the Lord always pleads His servant's cause.
God works here ahead of a sin, not after it. Such care draws far less notice than forgiveness.
I do not know anything in scripture which gives a greater idea of the preventive watchfulness of God. We all know that He restores our souls when we fail. But do we think enough about the little things in our daily life that He has prepared and arranged so that we may not fail? It is "lest I should be exalted above measure" — not bringing me back after failure, but preventing its occurrence.
- Kept. Abimelech's hands were clean because God held them. The innocence was real, but God gave it; the king did not earn it.
- Kept for a purpose. Sarah was about to bear the promised son. So God acted to protect her, even though the failure was Abraham's.
- Kept against an enemy. Sarah in Pharaoh's house, then in Abimelech's, then Rebekah. Three tries to blend the chosen line into the nations and block the coming Seed.
- Kept, and still honoured. God corrects His servant in private, yet defends him in public. The honest king is a dead man; the man who lied is a prophet who must pray for him.
- Kept before the fall, not only after it. God restores us when we fail. He also arranges the things that keep us from falling. That mercy is for leaning on, never for presuming.
And now, restore the man's wife; for he is a prophet, and will pray for thee, that thou mayest live. And if thou do not restore [her], know that thou shalt certainly die, thou and all that is thine.
God speaks to Abimelech in a dream. Abraham has passed off Sarah as his sister, yet God calls him a prophet — and warns the king he is a dead man unless he gives her back. Why the title of honour for the man whose lie caused the trouble, and why does the king's life hang on that man's prayer?
This is the first time the word appears in the Bible. It does not mean what most people assume.
It is clear from this that "prophet" does not mean only someone who predicted the future. That was not the question here. A prophet is someone who told out the mind of God. He spoke by the evident guidance of the Spirit what no one could know by natural means, and so he put the soul all the more before God and His light. So Abraham is a prophet (Gen. 20:7), and the patriarchs generally (Ps. 105:15).
The verse joins two things that look unrelated — being a prophet and praying for someone else.
Being a prophet means having the mind of God communicated to you. That places a man in — and assumes — an intimacy with Him. Such intimacy lets him ask of God, and receive, and get what he asks. By its very nature it produces and implies a confidence, a claim in grace that comes out of intimacy, a possession of His mind that lets him intercede... And note this. The Christian is in the same position, so far as he values his place in Christ: "If you abide in me, and my words abide in you, ask whatever you wish, and it will be done for you."
Abimelech had the stronger case. Abraham had deceived him, and he said so, pleading the integrity of his heart.
Notice how God enters the scene to vindicate His servant. He says to Abimelech, "Behold, you are a dead man." Yes — he was a dead man, for all "the integrity of his heart and innocence of his hands," for all his fine moral sense of right and wrong. He was a dead man the moment it became a question between him and even an erring child of God. God, in His grace, was looking at His dear servant from a different point of view than Abimelech's. All the king could see in Abraham was a man guilty of an obvious piece of deception, but God saw more than that... What dignity is put upon Abraham here! God Himself vindicates him before the world! Not a syllable of reproof! Not a breath of disapproval!
At this moment the pagan king looks like the more godly of the two.
The whole story suggests that at that time Abimelech the Philistine had more godly fear in his mind than Abraham the Hebrew — "the friend of God." Yet Abraham was a prophet, and had power to intercede such as Abimelech did not have! We may learn from this in passing that God does not take away our privileges as saints and priests even when our spiritual condition is low. For the time being, though, we are not enjoying them and cannot use them for the blessing of others.
But the honour cuts both ways.
Still, the privileges of being a prophet and an intercessor only increase the evil of his double-dealing. The world is quick to see this. Abimelech at once calls Abraham and challenges him about what he has done... Abraham had sunk not only beneath the height of his calling, but beneath the conduct of a decent man of the world.
The verse is not only comfort. It ends with a warning.
Then the Lord tells Abimelech to restore Abraham's wife to him. Because Abraham was a prophet, he would pray for Abimelech. This itself would humble Abraham and teach Abimelech. Even a man caught up in a wrong without knowing it needs the grace of God. But the Lord also tells him this: if he would not restore Sarah to her husband, he would die, together with his household. Now that he knew the truth, he had to act on it.
- Prophet — the word's first appearance in Scripture describes a man who carries God's mind, not one who predicts the future.
- Nearness — holding God's mind brings a man close to Him, and out of that closeness comes prayer for others. The same is true of the believer who abides in Christ.
- Vindication — God defends Abraham before a king who had every right to complain, without one syllable of reproof.
- Privilege — a low spiritual state does not cancel our standing, but it can leave us unable to enjoy it or use it for others. Nearness to God makes the failure heavier, not lighter.
- Obedience — sincerity did not shield Abimelech; once he knew the truth, he had to restore the wife or die.
And Abimelech rose early in the morning, and called all his servants, and spoke all these words in their ears; and the men were greatly afraid.
A dream in the night ended with a warning of death. By morning Abimelech had gathered his whole court and told them what God said. Their fear raises a hard question. Why is the fear of God so clear in this Philistine house, and so faint in the man of faith camped nearby?
The king does not wait. He goes first to his own men, and only then to Abraham.
Abimelech rose early the next morning. First he told his servants what God had said to him. This frightened them, for they were members of his household (v. 8). Then he called Abraham. He protested that Abraham had treated him and his kingdom so unfairly by this deceit. Had Abimelech sinned against Abraham that he should deserve to suffer in this way? What had Abraham seen among the Philistines to move him to do such a thing? (v. 10).
The threat was never aimed at the king alone. Everyone in his house stood inside the danger.
Abraham had assumed Gerar was a place with no reverence for God at all. The morning scene says otherwise. And the way God delivered His message was itself a rebuke.
When faced by Abimelech with his deception, Abraham confessed that fear for his own safety, in a place not marked by the fear of God, had led him into it. The result, however, was that the fear of God showed more in Abimelech than in Abraham. God had appeared to Abraham so often. Yet now He passed him by and dealt with the king in a dream, showing him the true situation Himself. That was a clear rebuke to Abraham. God tells the king that Abraham is a prophet and a man who prays for others. Yet in this matter God ignores him.
God had other ways to deal with this. He had struck Pharaoh with plagues. Here He speaks instead, and He sends the rebuke through an outsider.
Once again God stepped in with mercy. This time He did not send plagues, as He did with Pharaoh. He spoke straight to Abimelech in a dream. He told him he was a dead man because of the woman he had taken, for she was a man's wife. Why did God not directly reprove Abraham? Was it not so that the rebuke from Abimelech would make him feel ashamed in front of the man he had wronged?
This was not a sudden slip. Something had been lodged in Abraham's heart for years.
It took twenty-five years for Abraham to get to the bottom of the unbelief hiding in his heart (Gen. 20). It also took much discipline to teach Peter where his danger lay. And so with us all. "The fear of man lays a snare" — and those who in one company have faithfully confessed Christ have in another, through fear of man, denied Him.
Note the reversal. Abraham feared men and lost his footing. The men he feared woke up afraid of God.
Abraham's failure was on public display in Gerar. That exposure had a purpose.
It was necessary for Abraham, however, that he should come under the rebuke of the world. The world hates Christ and those who seek to be true to Him. Even so, it expects a standard of behaviour far greater and higher than its own. And it watches such conduct with critical, disapproving eyes.
Abimelech had a real case to plead, and God allowed it. Yet the same message that spared the king did not lower Abraham's standing.
The Philistine king could plead that his heart was sincere and his hands were innocent. He spoke for his people as well as himself. Abraham and Sarah were both guilty of deceit. Yet notice what God does. He allows the plea, showing that He had kept the king from actual sin. At the same time He keeps Abraham in the special place he held: "Now therefore return the man's wife, for he is a prophet, so that he will pray for you, and you shall live."
- Warning — God speaks to Abimelech at night. At first light the king tells his household, before he confronts anyone else.
- Fear — the men tremble because the threat covered the whole house. One man's danger became everyone's.
- Reversal — Abraham feared for his life in a place he judged godless. Yet the fear of God showed more in Abimelech than in Abraham.
- Reproof — God passed by His prophet and used an outsider. Abraham had to feel shame before the man he had wronged.
- Restoration — the failure does not cancel the calling. Abraham is still a prophet, and his prayer will save the king's life.
And Abimelech called Abraham and said to him, What hast thou done to us? And in what have I sinned against thee, that thou hast brought on me, and on my kingdom, a great sin? Thou hast done to me deeds that ought not to be done.
A king outside the family of faith asks Abraham to explain himself, and Abraham has no answer that will hold. Why did a man of such faith fall into the same trap twice, and what did God do with him afterwards?
Abimelech asks how he had sinned against Abraham. The answer is that he had not — the wrong ran the other way:
The world is quick to notice such double-dealing, for at once Abimelech calls Abraham and challenges him about what he has done. In plain words Abimelech truly says, "You have done to me things that ought not to be done." Abraham had failed in faith in God. He had wronged his wife. He had also wronged the man of the world. Abraham had sunk not only below the height of his calling, but below the conduct of a decent man of the world.
Abimelech says the sin touched his whole kingdom. This was not the first kingdom to suffer for Abraham's failure:
That root had sprouted and produced its bitter fruit, but the sharp knife of self-judgment had never yet touched it. The root breaks the surface again in Genesis 20, in the matter of Abimelech, king of Gerar. Here the same scene plays out again after years of rich experience of God's goodness and loving-kindness. Trouble came on the king of Egypt and his house before. Trouble comes on the king of Gerar and his house now.
Abraham had held this secret for years. It took a stranger's blunt questions to open it:
This was bringing the father to the point. There was no escaping such plain dealing. So Abraham opens his heart and unlocks the secret room he had kept shut for so many years. He tells it all out. He exposes every fibre of the root that had caused so much trouble to himself and to others.
Abraham's answer in the next verses defends him; it does not confess:
As so often when a believer fails, there is the effort to soften the failure instead of the honest confession, "I have sinned." For a sinner or a saint alike, no three words in human language are so hard to say as those. So Abraham tries to excuse his double-dealing. He explains that Sarah was in fact his sister, though he had held back the truth that she was also his wife.
The warning reaches past Abraham to the reader:
His deception got the same result that a deliberate lie would have. Deceit will likely lead us into embarrassing trouble, for it comes from weakness of faith.
He had assumed there was no fear of God in Gerar. The chapter reverses that assumption on him:
Abimelech confronted Abraham with his deception. Abraham admitted his reason: he feared for his own safety in a place not marked by the fear of God. Yet in the end the fear of God was more evident in Abimelech than in Abraham. God had appeared to Abraham so often, yet now He passed him by. He went to the king in a dream instead and laid the true situation before him. That was a definite rebuke to Abraham.
The rebuke shames Abraham, but God does not discard him:
However great their failure, God does not give up His people. He will never throw away His pearls because of some grit clinging to them... God tells Abimelech that the very man who had so wronged him stands so near to God that he can pray for him. Despite his failure, he is a prophet and an intercessor with God. God does not deny these high privileges because of his failures.
Mackintosh takes Abimelech's "What have you done to us?" and turns it on the reader:
Have you any secret reserve in your soul? Do you have any hidden root of evil deep down in your heart and mind? Is there anything you are keeping back from the light and from the edge of the knife? Search and see! Search diligently!
- Root: an evil you never judge after the first failure will sprout again years later. Egypt came back as Gerar.
- Fruit: a believer's deceit dragged a whole kingdom into trouble. It sank him below the conduct of a decent man of the world.
- Knife: plain questions from an outsider opened the room Abraham had kept locked for years.
- Excuse: his first instinct was to explain, not to confess. "I have sinned" — the three hardest words for saint or sinner.
- Grace: God kept Abraham's place as prophet and intercessor through it all. That is why you can face the same question today.
And Abimelech said to Abraham, What hast thou seen that thou hast done this?
Abimelech has already challenged Abraham about what he did. Now he presses for the reason behind it. The answer will bring into the open something Abraham had kept hidden for years.
The question leaves Abraham no room to dodge, and he answers in full.
"And Abimelech said to Abraham, What did you see, that you did this thing?" This was bringing the father to a point. There was no escaping such plain dealing. So Abraham frankly opens his heart and unlocks that secret room he had kept shut for so many years. He tells it all out. He exposes every fibre of the root that had caused so much trouble to himself and to others. Let us listen to the open confession of this dear and honoured man of God: "I did it because I thought, There is no fear of God at all in this place, and they will kill me because of my wife."
The story did not start in Gerar. Abraham had told it before, in Egypt, and the rebuke he got there changed nothing underneath.
When Abraham went down into Egypt, he made an agreement with Sarah his wife to conceal part of the truth. "Say, I ask you," he said, "that you are my sister" (Gen. 12:13). One evil always leads to another… The Lord struck Pharaoh's house because he had taken Sarah into it, and Pharaoh rebuked Abraham for what he had done. Even so, Abraham says nothing at all about the deliberate agreement he had made with his wife to hold back part of the truth. He takes the rebuke in silence and goes on his way. But the root of the evil stayed in his heart. It was ready to show itself at any time if circumstances arose to draw it out.
Years of faithful living lie between Egypt and Gerar. None of it settled this one point.
It is remarkable to watch Abraham pass through such brilliant scenes over a series of years. All that time this moral point stays unsettled in his heart — the point where he had gone wrong at the very start of his course. It did not show itself in those years, because Abraham was not in circumstances that would call it out. Yet there it was all the same. The evil was not fully brought out — not confessed, not got rid of. Here is the proof. The moment he again meets circumstances that could work on his weak point, the weak point shows itself at once.
The same writer finds the pattern in Peter.
We can never know what is in our hearts until circumstances arise to draw it out. Peter did not imagine that he could deny his Lord. But he got into circumstances that pressed on his particular weakness, and he showed that the weakness was there.
God did not rebuke Abraham directly. One writer sees purpose in that.
Why did God not directly reprove Abraham? Was it not because the reproof he received from Abimelech would make him feel ashamed before the face of the man he had wronged?
The charge is fair. It measures Abraham against the standard of an ordinary honest man.
Still, the privileges of being a prophet and an intercessor only increase the evil of his double-dealing. The world is quick to notice this. At once Abimelech calls Abraham and challenges him about what he has done. In plain language Abimelech truly says, "You have done to me things that ought not to be done." Abraham had failed in faith in God. He had wronged his wife. He had also wronged the man of the world. Abraham had sunk not only below the height of his calling, but below the conduct of a decent man of the world.
Mackintosh turns from Abraham's root to the reader's own.
Here was the root of the whole matter… Have we not all our roots? Yes, truly — deep, strong and bitter roots. They have brought a world of sorrow and shame on ourselves, and trouble to the people we deal with. Well then, we must reach these roots and judge them. As long as they stay unreached and unjudged, we simply cannot reach the higher stages of the path of devotedness.
- The root. The question exposed an old agreement. Years earlier in Egypt, Abraham asked Sarah to hold back part of the truth.
- Hidden, not gone. Abraham took Pharaoh's rebuke in silence, and the root stayed. Nothing between Egypt and Gerar drew it out.
- Drawn out. Weakness shows itself only when circumstances press on it. Peter found that out in a denial he never thought possible.
- Exposed. God let the rebuke come from the man Abraham had wronged, so Abraham would feel the shame face to face. He had sunk below the conduct of a decent man of the world.
- Judged. The question forced the secret room open at last. Roots left unreached and unjudged block any real progress.
And Abraham said, Because I said, Surely the fear of God is not in this place, and they will kill me for my wife's sake.
Abimelech asks Abraham why he did it. Abraham gives his reason: he had already judged Gerar as a place with no fear of God, so he expected the men there to kill him over his wife. The verse opens up two questions at once — was his estimate of the place true, and what does it say about the man who made it?
Abraham's reason rests on one phrase: the fear of God. The word behind it is used elsewhere in Scripture too.
θεοσέβεια (theosebeia) means 'worship or reverence of God' or 'reverential fear of God' (1 Tim. 2:10). The Greek Old Testament uses the same word for 'the fear of God' in Gen. 20:11, and for 'the fear of the Lord' in Job 28:28.
Abraham makes an accusation against a whole city. One writer notes what that accusation reveals about the accuser at that moment.
How low this man of God has fallen! He is carried away by his own thoughts, thinking only of himself and his safety. He acts with a double-dealing that shows he himself did not have the fear of God before him at that moment — however much he may charge others with lacking the fear of God.
The chain in Abraham's sentence runs from a thought, to a fear, to a concealment. One writer points to the weakness behind it.
Abraham's explanation sadly shows the weakness of his faith in the living God. If God had led him to that place, God would sustain him — whether the fear of God was in the place or not. But he says he thought the fear of God was not in the place. He reasoned that the men there might kill him for his wife's sake. So he concealed the truth that Sarah was his wife.
So what did Abraham trust instead? One writer answers that, and shows where such evasions come from.
Because he thought the fear of God was not in that place, he chose a lie for his confidence instead of the God of truth and faithfulness. Dodging and lying are the natural tools of spiritual timidity. God is the believer's strength.
The rest of the chapter tests Abraham's assessment against the facts, and the test does not go his way.
Abraham found that he was wrong in thinking that the fear of God was not in Gerar. It was the fear of God that moved Abimelech to restore Sarah to her husband. The same fear moved him to add gifts for Abraham: sheep, oxen, and servants, both male and female. The very receiving of such gifts would be a reproof to Abraham's fear, but a kind reproof.
Abraham does not stop at his motive. He goes on to argue that what he said was true as far as it went.
So often when a believer fails, he tries to soften the failure instead of making the honest confession, "I have sinned." No three words in human language are so hard to say — for a sinner or a saint — as the words, "I have sinned." So Abraham tries to excuse his double-dealing. He explains that it was quite true that Sarah was his sister, even though he had held back the truth that she was also his wife.
Behind the excuse lies a deeper root. One writer turns that straight on the reader.
Have we not all our roots? Yes, truly — deep, strong and bitter roots. They have brought a world of sorrow and shame to ourselves, and trouble to the people we had to deal with. Well then, we must reach these roots and judge them. As long as they stay unreached and unjudged, it is completely impossible for us to reach the higher stages of the path of devotedness.
Scripture records this episode without protecting Abraham's reputation. One writer sees that honesty as a mark of the Bible itself.
When false sacred writings touch on real events, they praise their heroes and carefully hide their faults, even when they do not sink to outright fable. The Spirit of God deals very differently. In the Old Testament He deals with the conduct of the fathers or the people of Israel. In the New He deals with the sins even of an apostle, and with the shame of a whole assembly.
- Thought — the trouble starts with "I thought": Abraham's own reasoning, not his faith, sets his course.
- Fear — the phrase means reverence toward God. The man who says others lack it is acting without it himself.
- Substitute — when confidence in God goes missing, something fills the gap. Here it was a lie. Timidity reaches for evasion.
- Correction — Gerar feared God more than Abraham thought. Abimelech's gifts were a kind reproof of his wrong estimate.
- Root — the cure is not explanation but honest confession. Roots left unjudged keep bearing the same fruit.
But she is also truly my sister, the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife.
Abimelech, the king of Gerar, has discovered that Sarah is Abraham's wife and demands an explanation. Abraham answers with a fact that raises a harder question: can a true statement still be a lie?
Abraham's defence rests on a technicality. He had not invented a relationship. He had left out the one that mattered more. It is the half-and-half quality that makes this so dangerous to believers.
The simple trick that Abram suggested to Sarai was not a downright lie. Sarai was his half sister, as we find in Genesis 20:12. Yet it worked out as a disaster. It was just that sort of half-truth, or half-lie, which has so often been a snare to true saints of God. People of the world may do such things and seem to gain by them. But if saints of God sink to that level, they always end up the losers.
One writer traces this habit to its source, and warns where it leads.
He wanted Abimelech to understand that he had not told an outright lie. Sarah was his half sister, and she had become his wife. But his deception got the same result that a deliberate lie would have. When we practise deceit it will likely lead us into embarrassing trouble, because it comes from weakness of faith.
Abraham gives an explanation, and skips the three hardest words a person can say.
When a believer fails, there is so often an effort to soften the failure, instead of the honest confession, "I have sinned." No three words in human language are so hard to say, for a sinner or a saint, as the words, "I have sinned." So Abraham tries to excuse his deceit. He explains that it was quite true that Sarah was his sister, though he had held back the truth that she was also his wife.
The excuse gives away more than Abraham intended. He traces the plan back to the day he left home, and he speaks of his calling in a way that drags it down.
The same question comes back to every reader.
Here was the root of the whole matter... Have we not all our roots? Yes, we have — deep, strong and bitter roots. They have brought a world of sorrow and shame on ourselves, and trouble on those we had to deal with. So these roots must be reached and judged. As long as they are left unreached and unjudged, it is impossible for us to reach the higher stages of the path of devotion.
Abraham's reasoning began with the assumption that God was not feared in Gerar. Abimelech's behaviour disproved it.
Abraham found that he was wrong in thinking that the fear of God was not in Gerar. It was the fear of God that prompted Abimelech, not only to restore Sarah to her husband, but to add gifts to Abraham of sheep and oxen and servants, both male and female. The very receiving of such gifts would be a reproof to Abraham's fear, but a kind reproof.
The reversal is complete: the outsider holds the moral high ground over the man of faith.
Is it not humbling when an outsider can rightly rebuke the people of God? They failed to hold fast their privileges, and it ended in a breach of common truthfulness... How often has fear of the world been a snare like this! Those who should have been faithful witnesses spoke evasively. So they threw what belongs to faith into the hands of the world, to the confusion and danger of all!
A story this unflattering to its hero says something about the book that preserves it.
When false holy books deal with real facts, they praise their heroes and hide their faults with great care, even when they do not sink to outright fable. The Spirit of God works in the opposite way. In the Old Testament He deals with the conduct of the fathers and the people of Israel. In the New He deals with the sins even of an apostle, and the shame of a whole church.
- Root. The plan with Sarah dated back to the day he left his father's house — an unjudged root of unbelief, still alive years later.
- Fruit. From that root grew a half-truth: true as far as it went, and told to hide what mattered.
- Result. The deception got the same result an outright lie would have. The technicality protected nothing.
- Rebuke. An outsider had to correct the man of faith about plain truthfulness.
- Remedy. Not an explanation but "I have sinned." Roots left unjudged block every higher stage of devotion.
And it came to pass when God caused me to wander from my father's house, that I said to her, Let this be thy kindness which thou shalt shew to me at every place whither we shall come, say of me, He is my brother.
Abimelech's blunt question — what were you thinking? — forces Abraham to bring out an arrangement he and Sarah had made at the very start of their journey. His answer explains the failure at Gerar. It also shows how he now describes God's call on his life, and how long a buried root can live in a believing heart.
Abraham does not say "I panicked." He points back to the day they left home. One writer notes how far back this went, and how little the years had changed it:
The old agreement between Abraham and Sarah is acted on again after so long a time — acted on now at Gerar, as before it had been in Egypt. It had been made between them before they left their native country. It was brought out with them from the very place of their birth. It was, I may say, in them older than anything of God; and after many changes and exercises it is in them and with them the same thing still.
Another writer points to what the arrangement denied, and to how early it started:
Sarah is the wife of Abraham according to promise. He denies this position. Once again he calls Sarah his sister. This was worse than before, for to faith she is the mother of the heir of the world... There is another point to notice here. This was an arrangement of unbelief when he first started from his father's house (Gen. 20:13). So soon was the seed of unbelief at work in the one called according to promise.
Abraham sums up the greatest event of his life to a foreign king: "God caused me to wander." One writer weighs those words against what the call was:
Moreover, it comes out that this failure has an unjudged root of unbelief far back in his history. In a false position he lowers the testimony of God to the level of the world's understanding. He says, "When God caused me to wander from my father's house." He does not say, "When God called me to a heavenly country and a city which has foundations." Instead he gives the impression that God had caused him to wander from his father's house, like any mere runaway.
That way of speaking is not unique to Abraham. Another writer asks whether these are the words of faith at all:
Is this Abraham's estimate of that sovereign call of the God of glory, which reached him when he was worshipping other gods? For a moment he lost sight of the call, the inheritance and the privileges of a heavenly man. He said only, "God caused me to wander from my father's house." Is this the thought or the confession of faith? But is Abraham alone in this? How often do we find words on our lips that do not rise above the level of natural men?
The plan was to say "he is my brother" — and Sarah really was his half-sister. That technical accuracy is exactly what makes it dangerous:
The simple trick that Abram suggested to Sarai was not an outright lie. Sarai really was his half-sister, as we find in Genesis 20:12. Yet it ended in disaster. It was just that kind of half-truth, or half-lie, which so often has been a snare to true saints of God. Men of the world may do such a thing and seem to come out ahead. But when saints of God come down to that level, they always lose in the end.
The name for God, Elohim, is plural in form. In this verse the verb joined to it is plural too:
Perhaps not everyone has heard this, but it is still true. In the original Hebrew "God" is in the plural, which naturally points to more than one Person. Yet "created" is in the singular... Cases like Gen. 20:13 ("God caused") where the verb is plural, like the noun, prove that God (Elohim) was known to be a true plural.
In Egypt the same arrangement caused the same trouble. Here at Gerar Abraham says it out loud. One writer turns the moment on the reader:
Do you have any secret reserve in your soul? Any hidden root of evil deep down in your heart and mind? Is there anything you are keeping back from the light and from the edge of the knife? Search and see! Search diligently! Do not deceive yourself, and do not let Satan deceive you. Deal honestly and truly with your own soul in this matter.
- Root — the failure at Gerar was not new. Abraham and Sarah made the agreement before they left home, and carried it along unjudged ever since.
- Words — "God caused me to wander" drops a call to a heavenly city to the language of a runaway.
- Half-truth — Sarah really was his sister. Truth used to cover the truth still traps believers, and they always lose by it.
- Exposure — a foreign king's plain question drags the old secret into the open.
- Knife — what stays unjudged stays alive. Search your own heart for what you have never brought into the light.
And Abimelech took sheep and oxen, and bondmen and bondwomen, and gave [them] to Abraham, and restored him Sarah his wife.
Abraham lied about Sarah out of fear. Now the king he wronged hands the wife back, and adds sheep, oxen and servants on top. The gifts feel like a rebuke wrapped in kindness. They raise the question this chapter turns on: what does God do with a servant whose failure is now public?
Abraham had assumed that Gerar was a place with no fear of God. The gifts prove him wrong about the very thing he feared.
Abraham found that he was wrong in thinking that the fear of God was not in Gerar. It was the fear of God that moved Abimelech. He gave Sarah back to her husband, and he added gifts to Abraham of sheep and oxen and servants, both male and female (v. 14). Simply receiving such gifts would be a rebuke to Abraham's fear, but a kind one.
Abraham's lie harmed more than one person.
Not only had Abraham failed in faith in God, not only had he wronged his wife, but he had wronged the man of the world. Abraham had sunk, not only beneath the height of his calling, but beneath the conduct of a decent man of the world.
The livestock and servants are payment for the wrong. But they come with words attached — to Sarah, and to her husband too.
Here Abimelech gives Sarah back to Abraham with many sheep and oxen, male and female servants. He also gives him open permission to live anywhere in the land that seems good to him. Yet this comes with a severe rebuke to Sarah, and indeed to her husband. The Philistine had paid the price to put things right. But what a covering of the eyes the husband had been for his wife, in front of all who were with her and everyone else! Is it not humbling when an outsider can rightly rebuke the people of God for failing to hold fast their privileges, until it ends in a plain breach of truthfulness?
The most telling detail is what Abraham accepts. In the day of victory he had refused everything the king of Sodom offered.
Despite Abraham's failure, Abimelech acts in a righteous and even generous way. He is a man of the world, yet his conduct stands in striking contrast to Abraham's. In the day of power and victory over the enemy Abraham refused to take "a thread or a sandal strap" from the king of Sodom. In the day of weakness and unbelief he will accept sheep, oxen, male and female servants, and a thousand pieces of silver from the king of Gerar.
The root of such a fall is losing the sense that God is enough.
It is often a sorrow to notice how the children of God dishonour Him. They lose the sense that He is enough for every emergency, and as a result they lower themselves before the world. As long as we live in the truth that all our springs are in God, we will stay above the world in every shape and form.
Abimelech saw a deceiver. God described the same man in completely different terms.
But notice how God enters the scene to vindicate His servant. He says to Abimelech, "Behold, you are a dead man." With all "the integrity of his heart and innocence of his hands", with all his fine moral sense of right and wrong, he was "a dead man" the moment it became a question between him and even an erring child of God. All that Abimelech could see in Abraham was a man guilty of an obvious piece of deception. But God saw more than that. So He says to him, "Now then, return the man's wife, for he is a prophet, so that he will pray for you, and you shall live." What dignity is here put upon Abraham! God Himself vindicates him before the world!
A chapter later, the gifts flow the other way.
It may seem that, rather than Abraham giving gifts of sheep and oxen to Abimelech at this time, it would have been more fitting the other way around. This reminds us too that in Genesis 20:14 it was Abimelech who gave to Abraham sheep, oxen and servants at a time when Abraham was really to blame. Now it is Abraham's turn!
- Fear — Abraham assumed no one in Gerar feared God. That very fear moved Abimelech to hand Sarah back and load her husband with gifts.
- Reproof — the presents are a kindness that stings. It is humbling when an outsider can justly rebuke God's people for a plain breach of truthfulness.
- Contrast — in the day of victory he refused a thread or a sandal strap from the king of Sodom. In the day of unbelief he takes flocks, servants and silver from the king of Gerar.
- Vindication — Abimelech saw a deceiver; God called him a prophet and made the king's life depend on his prayers.
- Repayment — in Genesis 21 Abraham gives sheep and oxen to Abimelech, and the account settles the other way.
And Abimelech said, Behold, my land is before thee dwell where it is good in thine eyes.
Abraham had lied about Sarah to save himself, and the king he feared gave her back with gifts. Now that king offers him the run of his land — how should a believer answer kindness he has not earned?
Abraham's excuse was that no one in Gerar feared God. The gifts and this offer of land proved him wrong.
Abraham found that he was wrong in thinking that the fear of God was not in Gerar. The fear of God moved Abimelech to give Sarah back to her husband. It also moved him to add gifts for Abraham: sheep, oxen, and servants, both male and female (v. 14). Simply receiving such gifts was a rebuke to Abraham's fear — but a kind rebuke. In fact, Abimelech also gave Abraham permission to live wherever he wanted to in the land (v. 15).
Abraham assumed the worst about Gerar, and acted on his own assumption.
Abraham's own past makes these gifts awkward. In a day of victory he refused everything another king offered him.
Despite Abraham's failure, Abimelech acts in a right and even generous way. He is a man of the world, yet his conduct stands in striking contrast to Abraham's. In the day of power and victory over the enemy, Abraham refused to take "a thread or a sandal strap" from the king of Sodom. In the day of weakness and unbelief, he accepts sheep, oxen, male and female servants, and a thousand pieces of silver from the king of Gerar.
Strength refused what weakness accepted.
The open door was also a test. One writer points out that Abraham did not leave Gerar once he was free to go, and that Isaac later ran into trouble in the same place.
Famine made Isaac leave his place, and though not to Egypt, he went among the Philistines. Faith would have remained, and trusted in God, unmoved by famine. Isaac got into trouble among the Philistines. Gerar was no place for him… When Pharaoh found out that Sarah was Abraham's wife, he sent them away — "take her, and go." But Abraham did not leave Gerar when Abimelech gave Sarah back. Abimelech said, "Dwell where it pleases you." (Gen. 20:15.) Was it pleasing to God that Abraham should stay in that land?
Pharaoh sent Abraham away. Abimelech asked him to stay — and he stayed.
The gift came with a rebuke, and the rebuke came from an outsider. Yet God still answered Abraham's prayer.
Here Abimelech gives Sarah back to Abraham, with many a sheep and ox, and many a male and female servant. He plainly gives him leave to live anywhere in the land that seems good to him. Yet a severe rebuke came with it, for Sarah and for her husband too… Is it not humbling when a Gentile has good reason to rebuke the people of God? They failed to hold fast their privileges, and it ended in a breach of plain honesty. Still, God listened to the prayer of Abraham… "wandering from nation to nation, from one kingdom to another people, He allowed no one to oppress them; He rebuked kings on their account, saying, 'Touch not my anointed ones, do my prophets no harm!'"
The chapter does not end with Abraham shamed. Owning the failure put him back in his proper place toward the world.
With the root of their failure exposed, Abraham once again takes up his true place toward the world, as an intercessor (vv. 17, 18).
Commentators differ in emphasis. One calls the gifts a kind rebuke of Abraham's fear. Another finds it humbling that an outsider had good reason to rebuke God's people.
- Fear — Abraham assumed no one in Gerar feared God. The king's conduct proved him wrong.
- Gift — the sheep, oxen, servants and open land were real kindness. Every item was also a quiet rebuke of the man taking it.
- Contrast — in victory Abraham refused a thread from the king of Sodom. In weakness he took a fortune from the king of Gerar.
- Invitation — an open door is not a call. Abraham stayed on in Gerar, and Isaac later found trouble in the same place.
- Restoration — Abraham owned the failure and stood again as intercessor. God, who rebukes kings for His people's sake, answered his prayer.
And to Sarah he said, Behold, I have given thy brother a thousand [pieces] of silver; behold, let that be to thee a covering of the eyes, in respect of all that are with thee, and with all; and she was reproved.
Abimelech hands over a large sum of silver, calls Abraham "your brother" one more time, and rebukes Sarah in front of everyone. Two questions follow: what did the money and the "covering of the eyes" mean, and what does it say when a man of the world has to correct a believer? (Older translations, which the commentators quote, read "he is to you a covering of the eyes" and close the verse "and she was reproved", where the ESV has "a sign of your innocence" and "you are vindicated".)
after
One writer sets Abraham's two days side by side: the day he refused a king's payment, and this one.
Abraham failed. Yet Abimelech, a man of the world, acts in a righteous and even generous way that stands in striking contrast to Abraham's conduct. In the day of power and victory over the enemy, Abraham refused to take "from a thread even to a shoe latchet" from the king of Sodom. In the day of weakness and unbelief he takes sheep, oxen, servants, and a thousand pieces of silver from the king of Gerar.
Abimelech calls Abraham her "brother," not her husband. One writer hears irony in that word:
God had spoken, and Abimelech acted very rightly. He treated Abraham generously, even while rebuking him. Sarah too came in for his rebuke, as verse 16 records. Speaking of Abraham as her "brother" added a touch of irony to his rebuke. It is a sad situation when an upright man of the world can rightly rebuke the saint of God. But it is a state of affairs all too often repeated.
The phrase points to a veil — the visible sign that a woman is already spoken for.
Still, though he gives gifts to Abraham, Abimelech does not hesitate to reprove Abraham's wife in terms of contempt: "Behold, I have given your brother a thousand pieces of silver: behold, he is to you a covering of the eyes." Had she been veiled, as Abraham's wife, Abimelech would never have seen her or taken her into his house. The veil speaks of the woman being exclusively for the one to whom she belongs.
Another writer turns the words back on Abraham himself:
What a veil Abraham had been to his poor wife! He had better buy a veil for her with the thousand pieces of silver. It was a keenly cutting condemnation — a rebuke no doubt addressed to Sarah, but how it must have touched Abraham to the quick! The Bible has recorded the sin of the father of the faithful for the good of all the children.
One writer draws a wider lesson from the veil:
All the varied beauties that mark the saints of God are for the eye of Christ alone. The moment anything sets out to attract the eye of man, the true character and beauty of the spiritual life are gone. When Rebekah saw Isaac she veiled herself; a very precious sign that she was to be for Isaac exclusively.
Another writer takes the picture further, from Sarah to the church:
This is the way the church becomes a lure to the kings of the earth, when she puts on outward glory... When she leaves her place of dependence as the weaker vessel and becomes the unveiled harlot, she loses her honour in the sight of the Lord. She gains it instead in the sight of men. Sarah was reproved in just this way when the words came, "Behold, he is to you a covering of the eyes."
God does not spare Abraham the shame. Yet He still answers his prayer:
The Philistine had paid his reparation price... Is it not humbling when a man outside God's people can rightly rebuke the people of God? They failed to hold fast their privileges, and it ended in plain dishonesty. Still, God listened to Abraham's prayer, and lifted the judgment that had fallen on the house of Abimelech... He would relieve Abimelech only at Abraham's prayer. But Abraham had to bear shame before the Philistine first, and confess the sin that had exposed him to rebuke from a man outside God's people.
Commentators differ on Abimelech's motive. One reads the gifts as contempt. Another hears kindness in them:
The very receiving of such gifts would be a reproof to Abraham's fear, but a kind reproof.
- Fear — Abraham's fear lay under the whole failure, and even Abimelech's gifts came back as a kind rebuke to it.
- Silver — the man who refused a thread from the king of Sodom in victory accepted a thousand pieces from the king of Gerar in weakness.
- Veil — a covering of the eyes marks a wife as her husband's alone; Abraham should have been that covering, and was not.
- Reproof — it humbles a believer when a man of the world can rightly correct him; the ironic "your brother" stings husband and wife alike.
- Restored — the shame is not the end. Abraham prays, God lifts the judgment on Abimelech's house, and the Bible records the sin for the good of all who follow.
And Abraham prayed to God, and God healed Abimelech, and his wife and his handmaids, and they bore [children].
A foreign king has just caught Abraham out in a lie. Yet the chapter ends with Abraham praying for that king, and God healing his whole household — so why would God make a pagan ruler depend on the prayers of the man who wronged him?
The healing only makes sense once you see the affliction behind it.
Then Abraham prayed for Abimelech and his household, and the Lord reversed the punishment He had placed on them in His government. None of the wives in Abimelech's court had been able to have children, because Abimelech had taken Sarah into his household.
Another writer describes the same reversal as a lifting of God's hand, and notes that Abraham first took the correction that came to him:
Abraham evidently accepted the rebuke and, as God had said, he prayed for the king and his household, and the hand of God which had been upon them in His government, was removed.
The order matters. God relieved Abimelech by one route only, and Abraham had to face his shame first.
Still, God listened to Abraham's prayer, and He removed the judgment that had fallen on the house of Abimelech... He would relieve Abimelech only through Abraham's prayer for him. But Abraham first had to bear shame in front of the Philistine, and confess the sin that had left him open to the blame and rebuke of a man outside God's people. How often has fear of the world been a trap like this! How often has double-talk from those who should have been faithful witnesses thrown what belongs to faith into the hands of the world!
Abimelech had the clear conscience here, and he still needed Abraham. God's verdict on the two men runs against appearances.
Abraham might lower himself in the eyes of Abimelech, king of Gerar. Abimelech might even have to rebuke him. Yet when God comes to deal with the case, He says to Abimelech, "Behold, you are a dead man;" and of Abraham He says, "He is a prophet, and he shall pray for you." Yes, for all "the integrity of his heart, and the innocence of his hands," the king of Gerar was "but a dead man." What is more, he owed the healing of his household to the prayers of that erring, inconsistent stranger. That is God's way. He may have many a private dispute with His child about his practical ways. But the moment the enemy brings a case against him, the Lord always pleads His servant's cause.
God calls Abraham a prophet here, and the title carries power to pray for others. It held even while Abraham's behaviour did not match it.
This is remarkable. The whole story suggests that at that time Abimelech the Philistine feared God more than Abraham the Hebrew did — and Abraham was "the friend of God." Yet Abraham was a prophet, and he had power to pray for others that Abimelech did not have. We can learn from this that even when our spiritual condition is low, God does not withdraw our privileges as saints, priests and so on. For a time we are not enjoying them, and we cannot use them to bless others.
Grace alone restores. Set beside God's faithfulness to Abraham, our habit of writing people off looks thin.
How different this is from the way we treat one another! We give each other up so easily, sometimes at the mere suspicion of wrongdoing, when faith would hold on to the people of God for God. How sweet and restoring this goodness of the ever-faithful One was for Abraham's soul! Grace alone restores: "sin will have no dominion over you, since you are not under law but under grace."
- Failure. Abraham's fear of the world led to a lie. A whole household paid for it: God closed every womb in Abimelech's court.
- Confession. God lifted the judgment only after a foreign king rebuked Abraham, and Abraham took the correction.
- Prayer. God chose one channel of relief and no other. Abimelech, the more upright man in the story, owed his rescue to the prayers of the man who wronged him.
- Healing. Abraham's standing as a prophet was God's gift, not his reward. God does not withdraw such privileges when our spiritual condition sinks.
- Honour. God pleads His servant's cause the moment anyone accuses him. That should stop us from giving each other up at the first hint of wrongdoing.
For Jehovah had fast closed up all the wombs of the house of Abimelech because of Sarah Abraham's wife.
Genesis 20 closes with one sentence that explains the whole crisis in the chapter. A royal household had been struck with barrenness, and Sarah was the reason. So why did God strike a foreign king, and not the man whose lie caused the danger?
The chapter records a failure by Abraham, and the closed wombs are God's answer to it. One writer notes that the timing made this failure worse than the earlier one.
This time it was even more serious, because Sarah was just about to bear the child of promise. Abraham's failure might have compromised what God had promised and was about to perform. So God took what we may call drastic action to protect Sarah — not dealing with Abraham, who had failed, but with the pagan king.
Older translations put "Jehovah" here where the ESV has "the LORD." One writer compares that name with "God" (Elohim) in the same story, and sees purpose in the change.
Jehovah struck Pharaoh with great plagues. Jehovah had firmly closed up the wombs of the house of Abimelech. In Abimelech's case the text adds one more thing. God knew Abimelech's integrity in the matter, and He warned him in a dream. Here the name Jehovah, the God of Israel, would have been out of place. Abimelech was a Philistine, and God had already called Abraham apart. Yet Elohim is gracious in nature and character. So He could discipline Abimelech for a time for his error, and warn him, while He preserved the integrity of the family He had chosen.
God shielded Sarah while Abraham was failing. One writer asks what that protection does and does not permit.
How gracious our God and Father is in the way He protects us even when we put ourselves in compromising positions! Yet this is no excuse for our failure, and we must not dare to count on God's protection when we deliberately do wrong.
The wombs opened only when Abraham prayed. But one writer notes what Abraham had to do before he could pray.
God listened to the prayer of Abraham, and He lifted the judgment that had fallen on the house of Abimelech... He would relieve Abimelech only when Abraham prayed for him. But Abraham must first be shamed in front of the Philistine. He had to confess the sin that had left him open to the blame and rebuke of a man outside God's people.
Another writer weighs what that dream meant for Abraham himself.
God had appeared to Abraham so often. Now He passed Abraham by and dealt with the king in a dream, telling him plainly how things stood. That was a definite rebuke to Abraham. Abraham was a prophet and a man who prayed for others, as the king is told — yet in this matter God ignores him.
Some writers read Sarah as a picture of grace itself. Her stay in a Philistine house then pictures grace claimed by people who can never own it.
Sarah in the Philistines' house can never become theirs, whatever they do: grace will not be handled by men's hands. More than that, her presence there stops all the wombs of the house of Abimelech. Their barren claim to grace prevents all real fruit.
The chapter ends with God's people in the wrong and a foreign king in the right. One writer sees the honesty of that record as a mark of Scripture itself.
False sacred writings, when they touch on real facts, praise their heroes and hide their faults with great care. That is true even when they do not sink into outright fable. The Spirit of God works in a very different way. In the Old Testament He records the conduct of the fathers and of the people of Israel. In the New He records the sins even of an apostle, and the shame of a whole assembly.
- Cause. God closed every womb in Abimelech's house, and the verse names the reason: Sarah.
- Protection. God shielded Sarah while Abraham failed. That kindness is never an excuse to walk into wrong.
- Shame. The rebuke came through a pagan king. God passed Abraham by in the very matter he had caused.
- Prayer. The judgment lifted only when the guilty man prayed. God still used Abraham, and humbled him at the same time.
- Fruit. Where grace sits in hands that can never own it, nothing grows. Give it back to its place, and life comes.