Genesis 14:1–12

Genesis 14:1 · Darby

And it came to pass in the days of Amraphel the king of Shinar, Arioch the king of El-lasar, Chedorlaomer the king of Elam, and Tidal the king of nations,

Genesis 14 opens with a list of foreign kings, and for the first time the Bible turns to armies and politics. Why does Scripture stop over a border war between small local rulers — and what does Abram, camped nearby, have to do with it?

The First War in Scripture

Genesis has already told of Babel and the scattering of the nations. This is the first battle in the Bible, and one writer explains who these "kings" were and why they marched.

The confusion of tongues at Babel divided mankind into nations, and we can have little doubt that this soon led to fighting and regular warfare. But Scripture gives no record of a battle until we reach Genesis 14. There four kings from the Mesopotamian district marched towards the Dead Sea, destroying cities on the way, and in the end defeated the five kings of the cities of the plain. The "kings" named were mostly, if not all, the leaders of single cities — what we would now call petty chiefs. Chedorlaomer seems to have been the overlord of the kings with him, and he had spread his rule over the region of Sodom. They threw off his rule, and that was the reason for the expedition.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The list of allied kings also shows what the world is like.

The chapter opens with a solemn picture of this present evil world. It is a scene where the nations form themselves into groups, and make alliances to push their plans for power and to defend themselves from attack.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why Scripture Bothers to Record It

A small local war fills a whole chapter of the Bible. One writer gives two reasons for that.

The campaign of Chedorlaomer and his allies against the king of Sodom and his partners was not a great thing in itself. Yet Holy Scripture gives a whole chapter to it, for two important reasons. First, because a saint of God, Lot, was caught up in it. Second, because the world's first recorded battle is in many ways a foreshadowing of the last great disaster of Armageddon.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Abram Stands Outside It

Abram's name is missing from this list of kings, and that absence is the point.

Here we have a very detailed account of a battle fought by "four kings with five," and we may ask: what did this quarrel between "the potsherds of the earth" have to do with the history of the people of God? With Abram, in one sense, nothing, for he was outside it all. His tent marked him as a stranger to all these things. It marked him as one to whom the battle of "four kings with five" would matter very little. His altar marked him as one whose pursuits were of another kind — heavenly. His tent showed him to be a stranger on earth; his altar showed him to be at home in Heaven.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Lot's case was the opposite. His suffering traced back to a choice he made long before the armies moved.

Lot's sufferings at the hands of the Gentile kings were entirely due to his unfaithfulness to God. Had he stood apart from the world and its ways, as Abram did, his path might have been as peaceful and happy as Abram's. He sought worldly advantages for himself and his family, so he sank to the world's level, and he suffered with the world in the day of trouble.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Reading the Two Alliances as a Picture

One writer looks past the geography. He asks what the two sides stand for, starting with the land the invaders came from.

The names are hard to read, and at least two of the allied countries are just as doubtful. But in the first list Amraphel, king of Shinar, stands first. He is beyond question the representative of the kingdom of Nimrod, although Chedorlaomer appears the most active and interested. They all seem to be only divisions of this Babylonish empire, though no doubt changed into an alliance of more or less equal powers… These four kings… are at war with the five petty kings of the plain of Jordan. As a picture, these last stand for the world in its open and sensual wickedness. The Babylonish kings stand for the religious world-power, which always seeks to hold that more open form of evil captive — and generally succeeds.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Names Found in the Ground

The kings of verse 1 are not legends. Sir Henry Rawlinson reported finding one of them in ancient records.

He had found the record of a king matching the Chedorlaomer of Genesis 14, about 1900 B.C., who was given the title "the ravager of Syria."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Such confirmation is welcome. But one writer warns against resting faith on it.

Faith accepts the record in Genesis 14, not because the clay tablets confirm it (however interesting that fact may be), but because the Spirit of God has written it. Anyone who accepts the statements of Scripture only when outside evidence confirms them is at heart an unbeliever.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What Came Out of a Forgotten Campaign

We no longer know what this war settled politically. Something else came out of it and remains.

Genesis 14 gives the first campaign on record. We cannot say what its political results may have been. But a spiritual outcome came out of it, and its value will last "for ever."

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- War — The Bible's first battle: four city-rulers against five, after Chedorlaomer's subject kings threw off his rule.

- World — Verse 1 shows this present age: nations forming blocs for gain and defence, and God nowhere in the picture.

- Separation — Abram's tent and altar kept him clear of the fighting. Lot went after worldly gain near Sodom, and his losses followed his choice.

- Shadow — Writers see Babylon behind the invaders, and see this first war as a picture of the world's last great war.

- Outcome — The politics of this war are forgotten. What came out of it lasts forever.

Genesis 14:2 · Darby

[that] they made war with Bera the king of Sodom, and with Birsha the king of Gomorrah, Shinab the king of Admah, and Shemeber the king of Zeboim, and the king of Bela, which is Zoar.

This verse names the local side of the conflict. Five small kings ruled cities near the Dead Sea, and the list ends with Bela, better known as Zoar. Behind the list lies the first battle recorded anywhere in Scripture. Why does God give a whole chapter to a local quarrel between minor rulers?

The revolt behind the war

These five kings were not independent powers going to war as equals. They were breaking away from an overlord.

We can have little doubt that the confusion of tongues at Babel, and the division of mankind into nations that followed, must soon have given rise to fighting and regular warfare. But we have no record of a battle in the Scriptures until we reach Genesis 14. Four kings from the Mesopotamian district then marched towards the Dead Sea. They ravaged cities on the way, and in the end defeated the five kings of the cities of the plain. Most of these "kings", if not all, were leaders of single cities — what we would now call petty chiefs. Chedorlaomer seems to have been the overlord of the kings joined with him, and he had extended his rule over the region of Sodom. The rejection of his rule was the reason for the expedition.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Names that spell out the character of the cities

The names of the first two kings carry meanings, and one commentator reads them as a picture of the world these men ruled.

The five kings are typical of the outright wickedness of the ungodly, corrupt world. The king of Sodom, Bera, means "in the evil," and Birsha (king of Gomorrah) means "in wickedness."

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Bela, also called Zoar

The verse pauses to note that Bela is also called Zoar. Of the five towns listed, this one has a different end.

One of the five cities of the plain in the land of Canaan, and the only one that survived when they fell under the judgement of God. It was formerly called BELA. Lot fled to it when Sodom fell, but he was afraid to stay there.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why God bothered to write it down

Why does a small local war fill a whole chapter of the Bible? The measure God uses is not the size of the armies.

The Bible stoops to small matters as well as unfolding the highest themes. To the believing heart that is one of the many proofs that it has really come from God. Every detail about His own people in the world is of the deepest interest to God. That is a most precious fact. He numbers our hairs; He takes account of our tears; He remembered Paul's need of a cloak; and He considered the weak condition of Timothy's stomach. If His people are caught up in a small raid, it matters more to God than the mightiest military campaigns that leave them untouched.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Two relatives, two very different positions

Abram had no stake in this quarrel. Lot did, because of where he had settled.

Although Abraham was not affected by the battle of "four kings with five," Lot was. His position was such as to involve him in the whole affair. As long as grace enables us to walk the path of simple faith, we shall stand completely outside the range of this world's circumstances. But we may give up our high and holy position as those whose "citizenship is in heaven," and seek a name, a place, and a portion on the earth. Then we must expect to share in earth's upheavals and changes.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The first war and the last

Commentators also read this opening battle as a picture of something still ahead.

The expedition of Chedorlaomer and his allies against the King of Sodom and the kings with him was not a very big thing in itself. Yet Scripture gives a whole chapter to it, for two important reasons. First, one of God's people (Lot) was caught up in the affair. Second, the world's first recorded battle pictures in many ways the last great disaster, Armageddon.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — Chedorlaomer ruled the region of Sodom. These five city-chiefs threw off his rule, and his invasion was the answer.

- Character — Bera means "in the evil" and Birsha "in wickedness". The names of these two kings fit the wickedness of their cities.

- Contrast — Bela is Zoar, the one town of the five that later escaped the judgement that swallowed the rest.

- Concern — a small raid fills a whole chapter because one of God's people was caught in it. Nothing is too small for God when His own are in it.

- Consequence — the war left Abram untouched, but Lot's position dragged him into it. Seek a portion on earth and you share earth's upheavals.

Genesis 14:3 · Darby

All these were joined in the vale of Siddim, which is the salt sea.

The verse names the place: five kings pooled their forces in a valley that Scripture ties to the Salt Sea. Two questions follow. Where was this battlefield? And why is a war between foreign kings part of Abram's story at all?

The place named

Scripture gives two details about this valley and no map. One reference work sets them side by side:

One passage reads "the Valley of Siddim (that is, the Salt Sea)"; another says the valley was full of "slime-pits," older wording for bitumen springs. Genesis 14:3, 8, 10. It was no doubt near the Salt Sea, but no one has identified its site.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The fight came home

The two sides did not travel equal distances to this valley, and one writer marks the limit of what can be known:

No one knows what connection, if any, there is between the present state of the Salt Sea and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. The four kings had come from a distance. The five kings, two of whom were the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah, were near home. No one can trace the connection further than that. This sea is now called Bahr Lut, the "Sea of Lot."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

One writer sees God's hand in the choice of battlefield:

These kings then came into conflict. The fighting did not happen in the far distant east, where some of those in the fight had come from. God's deliberate hand brought it close to the spot where His witness walked. We see them in the valley of Sodom.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A world of alliances

One writer reads this gathering of kings as a picture of the world itself:

The chapter opens with a solemn picture of this present evil world. In it the nations form themselves into groups. They enter into alliances to carry out their schemes of self-advancement, and to defend themselves from attack.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why the Bible records it

One writer explains why Scripture bothers to record a war like this:

What has always made the history of nations, and the movements of mighty kings and conquerors, matter to the Holy Spirit is their connection with the history of the people of God. Beyond that, they held nothing of importance to Him. But when such things touch even slightly on the history of a "righteous soul," the Holy Spirit can be very detailed in describing a battle.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Abram had nothing at stake

Abram's name is missing from this battle. Two things marked him out and kept him clear of the quarrel:

His tent marked him as a stranger to all these things — it marked him as one to whom the battle of "four kings with five" would be a matter of very trivial importance. And his altar marked him as one whose pursuits were quite of another kind, even heavenly. His tent showed him to be a stranger on earth — his altar showed him to be at home in heaven. It did not matter to Abram whether the victory went to the king of Sodom or to Chedorlaomer, king of Elam. His portion was not in danger through their strife. He had it in that place "where thieves do not break in and steal."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Lot was in the middle of it

Lot had chosen this plain for himself, and the same writer draws out what it cost him:

Abram's happy lot was to have his life and his portion in a place where wars could have no effect on him. That was not the case with his more worldly-minded relative. His position placed him in the middle of the strife. So the outcome of this battle was of the deepest importance to him. If the child of God will stoop so low as to mix himself up with the world, he must expect to share in its upheavals.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer weighs what Lot's choice nearly cost him:

It is soon discovered what a disappointing world Lot was choosing. The well-watered plain soon becomes a field of battle. If it had not been for Abram, or Abram's God, Lot would have lost his freedom there and all his possessions.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Under the salt water

The verse's closing note — "that is, the Salt Sea" — looks ahead. What Lot saw as prime pasture now lies under salt water.

Lot had no idea what was coming. Before long the fair valley on which he was feasting his eyes would be the scene of devastating divine judgment. Much of the fertile pasture that promised him so much would lie beneath the waters of a salt sea.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- The place. The valley of Siddim lay near the Salt Sea and was full of bitumen springs. No one today knows its exact site.

- The alliance. Five kings joined forces here — a picture of the world itself, forming groups and alliances to get ahead and stay safe.

- The reason. Scripture follows the wars of nations only where they touch the people of God. The four kings came from far away; God's hand brought the fight close to where His witness walked.

- The choice. Abram's tent and altar kept him a stranger to the quarrel. Lot's address put him in the middle of it. Anyone who mixes with the world must expect to share its upheavals.

- The end. The well-watered plain became first a battlefield and then a salt sea — the verdict on what Lot chose by sight.

Genesis 14:4 · Darby

Twelve years had they served Chedorlaomer; and in the thirteenth year they rebelled.

This verse is one line of political history. Five small kings had served a distant overlord for twelve years. Then they refused. That refusal set off the first war recorded in the Bible — and it raises the question of why Scripture stops for a border revolt at all.

The overlord and the revolt

This verse holds the key to the whole chapter. Chedorlaomer was the leading king among the four invaders, and the cities near the Dead Sea had fallen under his control:

Scripture gives us no record of a battle until we reach Genesis 14. There four kings from the Mesopotamian district marched towards the Dead Sea. They destroyed cities as they went, and in the end defeated the five kings of the cities of the plain. Most of these "kings," if not all, were the leaders of single cities — what we would now call minor chiefs. Chedorlaomer seems to have been the overlord of the kings allied with him. He had extended his rule over the region of Sodom. The rejection of his overlordship was the reason for the expedition.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why Scripture records this war

Scripture passes over most of world history without comment. This war gets a whole chapter, and one writer explains the rule behind that choice:

The events which fill the history of the world with their commotion scarcely count for anything in the inspired book. God does not mention them except when they intervene in one way or another in the history of His people... In fact, the Word records the great clashes of nations for one purpose only: to let us witness the deliverance of a single person among those He loves. (Gen. 14)

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Serve or rebel

Twelve years of forced service, then revolt. That cycle is a portrait of the world the verse belongs to:

It is a lawless world where men are forced to serve governments against their will, or rebel against governments to get their freedom (v. 4).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Abram had nothing they wanted

Abram lived in the same land, yet no army came for him. One writer ties this to what Abram owned:

Abraham personally had nothing whatever to do with the revolt or its consequences. His "tent and altar" were not likely to give anyone a reason to declare war. They were not likely to be much affected by the war breaking out, or by how it ended. The portion that belongs to a heavenly man could never tempt the greed of this world's kings and conquerors, or stir their ambition.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Lot was inside the quarrel

Lot, by contrast, had settled in the region the invaders came for. The same writer draws out what that cost him:

As long as grace enables us to walk the path of simple faith, we are kept right outside the range of this world's circumstances. But suppose we give up our high and holy position as those whose "citizenship is in heaven." Suppose we seek a name, a place, and a portion on the earth. Then we must expect to share in earth's upheavals and changes. Lot had made his home in the plains of Sodom, and so the wars of Sodom affected him deeply and keenly.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A picture of bondage and a failed escape

Some read the verse as a picture as well as a record. On this reading, the twelve years of subjection and the failed revolt show the grip of a false system, and how little a self-made escape achieves:

The five kings were subject to Chedorlaomer for twelve years. This pictures the world held under false religion. In the end they rebelled against this bondage (v. 4)... But the sinful, ungodly world has little power against religion inspired by Satan. To be truly delivered from such a yoke, you need a true knowledge of the Lord Jesus.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. Others read the chapter as history alone, with a moral lesson about Lot.

Summary

- Yoke. Twelve years of service to Chedorlaomer is the background. Rejecting his rule is what brought the four invading kings.

- Revolt. The verse shows a world with only two options — serve against your will, or rebel to get free. Neither option delivers anyone.

- Reach. The war reached Lot because Lot had reached for Sodom. Settle in the world and you share its upheavals.

- Refuge. Abram's tent and altar offered nothing for conquerors to want, so the invasion passed him by.

- Rescue. Scripture records the clash of nations for one purpose: to let us watch God rescue one person He loves.

Genesis 14:5 · Darby

And in the fourteenth year came Chedorlaomer and the kings that were with him, and smote the Rephaim in Ashteroth-karnaim, and the Zuzim in Ham, and the Emim in Shaveh-Kirjathaim,

In the fourteenth year the eastern kings come back in force and crush three peoples before they ever reach Sodom. Commentators treat this as the first battle recorded in Scripture, and as a picture of a power the world cannot resist.

Why the kings marched

Verse 5 is the answer to the revolt of verse 4. Writers call it a campaign to win back a lost rule, wrecking cities on the way.

We have no record of a battle in the Scriptures until we reach Genesis 14. There four kings from the Mesopotamian district made an expedition towards the Dead Sea. They ravaged cities as they marched, and finally defeated the five kings of the cities of the plain… Chedorlaomer was apparently the overlord of the kings with him, and he had extended his rule over the region of Sodom. The rejection of his rule was the reason for the expedition.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Who the Rephaim were

The first name in the list is a Hebrew word that older translations left untranslated.

rapha means "a fearful one." In the plural, with "the" in front, it works as a proper name: the REPHAIM, or sons of Raphah. They were a race of giants who lived beyond the Jordan, and Og the giant king of Bashan came from them… At times the term Rephaim applies to any people in Canaan who were of great stature… The word Rephaim is untranslated in Gen. 14:5.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Emim, last in the list, got their name from the people who later took their land.

A people, described as "great, and many, and tall, as the Anakim," who lived on the east of the Dead Sea. Chedorlaomer and his allied kings struck them down. Their land later passed to the Moabites, who called the people EMIM, that is, "terrible."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Names on the map

Ashteroth-karnaim, the first battlefield in the verse, is named after a goddess:

Ashteroth-Karnaim — Double-horned Astarte (Phoenician); Venus.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A king out of the records

Chedorlaomer is not a legend. Commentators point to the sheer scale of his reach.

King of Elam in the time of Abram… The inscriptions carry the name of KHUDUR-LAGAMAR king of Elam, thought to be the same as Chedorlaomer. He had subdued the five kings near the Dead Sea. That was some 700 miles away across the desert, or 1,000 by the Euphrates and through the land of Canaan.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

One writer sets that fame beside a man who left no records at all:

At this point in the Scripture narrative we come to names of people that the archaeologists believe they can identify from their research into the past. Some of these greater kings, such as Amraphel and Chedorlaomer, left their mark on very ancient records. Abram the pilgrim left no mark of that kind. Years before, he had cut himself off from their cities and their whole way of life.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the campaign pictures

The kings crush six nations before they even reach Sodom. One writer sees in that advance a picture of false religion holding the world down:

The five kings were subject to Chedorlaomer for twelve years — a picture of the world held under false religion — but at last they rebelled against this bondage (v. 4)… Chedorlaomer and his allies began by defeating six nations (vv. 5-7) before they came to Sodom and Gomorrah… But the ungodly world of the flesh has little power against religion inspired by Satan. To be truly delivered from such a yoke, you need a true knowledge of the Lord Jesus.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The man the war passed by

These armies swept through the region, but the fight was never Abram's.

His tent marked him as a stranger to all these things. To him the battle of "four kings with five" would be a matter of very small importance. And his altar marked him as one whose pursuits were of quite another character, a heavenly one… It did not matter to Abram whether the crown of victory was about to rest on the head of the king of Sodom or of Chedorlaomer, king of Elam. His portion was not in danger through their strife.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Revolt — Twelve years of submission ended in revolt, so the eastern kings came back. Verse 5 is the first blow of that campaign, not a random raid.

- Giants — The Rephaim were a race of giants living beyond the Jordan. The Emim were tall too, their name means "terrible," and Moab later took their land.

- Reach — Chedorlaomer struck some 700 miles from home, and ancient inscriptions carry his name. Abram the pilgrim left no monument at all.

- Pattern — Six nations fell before the kings even reached Sodom. One writer reads that advance as a picture of the world held down by false religion.

- Distance — The armies swept past a man with a tent and an altar; what he owned was never on the battlefield.

Genesis 14:6 · Darby

and the Horites on their mount Seir, to El-Paran, which is by the wilderness.

This verse sits inside a list of conquests. Four kings from the east swept south, and the Horites of Seir were one more people in their path. The names are strange and the places remote. So why does Scripture keep such a careful record of a war Abram had not yet joined?

Who the Horites were

The verse names the people struck in Mount Seir. They were the original inhabitants of that region, and their name points to how they lived:

Descendants of Seir, and the original inhabitants of Mount Seir. The children of Esau destroyed them. It is thought that they were cave-dwellers, as the name implies. The sandstone rocks of Mount Seir are full of dwellings cut into the rock. There are traces of the same throughout the region of Edom.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The mountain itself may carry a man's name:

Seir was a Horite who lived in the land, and as a chief he may have given his name to Mount Seir. The Horim were dispossessed by the children of Esau.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The far edge of the march

The march reaches El-paran, on the border of the wilderness. That name marks a spot in the far south:

Some translations put 'the plain of Paran' in the margin. It may have been a boundary mark in the wilderness of Paran, in the south of Palestine.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The distance these kings travelled

Chedorlaomer was no local chief. The scale of his reach says something about how early organised power arose — and how it ended:

In the days of Abraham we hear of Chedorlaomer, king of Elam. He and his three allies came 2,000 miles to punish the kings under his rule in the valley of Siddim. That is plain proof of early power. Yet the father of the faithful punished him hard.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Names in the ground

Here the record touches ground that spades have reached:

It is an interesting fact that at this point in the Bible's story we come to names of people that archaeologists believe they can identify. Their digging into the past has turned these names up. Some of these greater kings, such as Amraphel and Chedorlaomer, left their mark on very ancient records. Abram the pilgrim would leave no mark of that kind. Years before, he had cut himself off from their cities and their whole way of life.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Who decides who holds the land

The Horites lost Seir twice over — first to this raid, later to Esau's descendants. One writer looks at the same peoples in Deuteronomy and sees God's purpose behind the change:

The possessions referred to here had long ago been in the hands of giants. But it was God's purpose to give their territories to the children of Esau and Lot, and so He destroyed these giants. Who or what can stand in the way of what God has planned?

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The pattern under the history

Commentators also read this march as a picture:

The five kings became subject to Chedorlaomer for twelve years. This pictures the world under the control of false religion. In the end they rebelled against this bondage (v. 4). But false religion can be determined and strong, as the history of the professing church through the middle ages teaches us. Chedorlaomer and his allies began by defeating six nations (vv. 5-7) before they approached Sodom and Gomorrah.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The answer to such power

The chapter ends with a reversal. One man stood outside this whole struggle, and he was the one who rescued its victims:

Turning away from the world is the path to victory over it. Choosing it means being held captive by its power. The powerful ones of the earth carry Lot away captive, along with the people his worldly leanings had led him to live among. Abram is free and walks in the faith of God. From God he has more force than all the kings, conquerors or conquered. He delivers Lot and the kings who could not help themselves.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sweep — Four kings came 2,000 miles and crushed people after people. The Horites of Seir were one of them, and the march reached the desert edge at El-paran.

- Cave — The Horites were the first people of Seir. Their name points to the rock dwellings still visible there, and the mountain may carry the name of one of their chiefs.

- Land — Seir changed hands more than once. God's purpose stood behind the change, and no power can block it.

- Monument — The invaders left their names in ancient records. Abram left none. He had already walked away from their cities and their way of life.

- Victory — The man who refused the world rescued the man who chose it.

Genesis 14:7 · Darby

And they returned, and came to En-mishpat, which is Kadesh, and smote all the country of the Amalekites, and also the Amorites that dwelt at Hazazon-Tamar.

Four kings are sweeping back on a long raiding march, striking the Amalekites and the Amorites before they turn on Sodom and carry Lot away. The verse reads like a list of names, yet it holds the Bible's first mention of Amalek, its first mention of Kadesh, and a war that Abram watches from outside.

A sweep through six nations

Verses 5 to 7 are not a detour. They show a power crushing everything in its path before it ever reaches the cities of the plain.

Chedorlaomer and his allies began by defeating six nations (vv. 5-7) before approaching Sodom and Gomorrah. Then the king of Sodom and Gomorrah, with three other kings, went out to engage the four kings in battle (vv. 8-9).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The places named run from mountain country to open desert.

So the whole world becomes a scene of warring interests and selfish conflicts — high places and lower ones alike, the mountain or the wilderness (v. 6).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

En-mishpat, that is, Kadesh

The verse gives this place two names. Kadesh, the second one, enters the Bible right here, and it returns again and again in Israel's later history.

This place is first mentioned in connection with the battle of the kings, when Lot was taken captive (Gen. 14:7). It was one of the stopping places of the Israelites, and they stayed there a long time. From there they sent the twelve spies into the land. At the end of the thirty-eight years' wandering they came back to Kadesh, and Miriam died and was buried there. It was here also that Moses struck the rock when the people complained about water.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The older name has a meaning of its own. A list of Genesis names gives it plainly:

En-mishpat — Fountain of judgment.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Amorites at Hazazon-tamar

The last place struck goes by another name in Scripture.

Same as En-gedi. Gen. 14:7. It is Hazazontamar in 2 Chr. 20:2.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

These Amorites were not strangers to Abram.

He was at the time living by the oaks of Mamre the Amorite, who with his two brothers were allies of Abram. In later years a link of this kind would have been wrong, but at this time "the iniquity of the Amorites was not yet complete" (Gen. 15:16), and the Lord makes no issue of it.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The first appearance of Amalek

Amalek appears here for the first time. The timing raises a question commentators cannot settle.

This early mention seems to show that the Amalekites were not the descendants of Amalek, the son of Eliphaz, the son of Esau (Gen. 36:12). Unless, that is, Scripture is naming the land that the descendants of Eliphaz would later occupy.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

This first mention matters because of what Amalek becomes later:

From Numbers 24:20 we learn that "Amalek was the first of the nations." He had won that place of supremacy by natural power and skill, long before Israel had become a nation. Here was Amalek, the man after the flesh, who had made himself great, resenting the intrusion of a people that God had chosen for Himself (Ex. 17).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Watching from outside the battle

Abram is nowhere in this verse, and that absence is the point.

His tent marked him as a stranger to all these things. It marked him as a man to whom the battle of "four kings with five" hardly mattered. And then his altar marked him as one whose pursuits were quite of another character, even a heavenly one. His tent showed him to be a stranger on earth; his altar showed him to be at home in Heaven.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Staying outside the fight did not mean staying still. When the raid carried off Lot, Abram acted.

He was not taking sides with the four kings of the Babylonian empire, or with the five kings of the cities of the plain. He had no need to enter the conflict to defend himself. It was for the express purpose of delivering a brother who had come under the power of the world.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Sweep. Six nations fall before Sodom is even touched. Mountain and desert alike become one scene of warring interests.

- Judgment. The stop named here is En-mishpat, "fountain of judgment." Its other name is Kadesh — later the place of Israel's long wandering, the spies, Miriam's grave, and the struck rock.

- Reach. Hazazon-tamar is another name for En-gedi. The Amorites struck there share a name with Mamre, Abram's ally, whose guilt was not yet full.

- Enemy. Amalek first appears in this verse, long before Esau's grandson of that name. Commentators cannot settle the puzzle, but Amalek comes to stand for the power that resents God's chosen people.

- Outside. Abram's tent and altar kept him clear of the whole conflict. He entered it only to rescue a brother who had fallen under the world's power.

Genesis 14:8 · Darby

And the king of Sodom and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboim, and the king of Bela, which is Zoar, went out, and they joined battle with them in the vale of Siddim,

Five kings march out and draw up for battle against the invaders who had ruled them. Why does Scripture record a war between pagan cities? And what happens to a believer living in the middle of it?

A conflict the man of faith stood outside

The chapter names armies, alliances and a battlefield. Abram appears nowhere. One writer draws the contrast from the two things Abram owned:

Here we have a very detailed account of a battle fought by "four kings with five." We may ask: what did this fight between "the potsherds of the earth" have to do with the history of the people of God? With Abram none, in one sense, for he was outside it all. His tent marked him as a stranger to all these things. It marked him as one to whom the battle of "four kings with five" mattered very little... His tent showed him to be a stranger on earth — his altar showed him to be at home in heaven. It did not matter to Abram who won the victory wreath — the king of Sodom or Chedorlaomer, king of Elam. His portion was not in danger through their strife, because he kept it in the place "where thieves do not break in and steal."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why Scripture records the battle

The account breaks in with no explanation. One commentator sees that silence as deliberate:

Notice how abruptly this comes in. God leaves us to form a spiritual judgment about how it connects with what came before... War was no such uncommon matter; but there was something very unusual in the results of this battle. God ordered things so as to draw everyone's attention unmistakably to Himself. There was a lesson shown to the world, and a lesson now taught to Lot, that ought not to be forgotten.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Valley of Siddim

Scripture ties this battlefield to the Salt Sea, and its ground was dangerous:

One passage reads "the Valley of Siddim (that is, the Salt Sea)"; another says the valley was "full of bitumen pits," that is, springs of tar. It was no doubt near the Salt Sea, though its exact site is unknown.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Five kings, and no strength to win

The five kings lose this battle. One writer sees more than politics in it:

The five kings served Chedorlaomer for twelve years. This pictures the world under the rule of false religion. At last they rebelled against this bondage (v. 4)... Then the king of Sodom and Gomorrah, with three other kings, went out to engage the four kings in battle (vv. 8-9). But the sinful, godless world has little power against religion inspired by Satan. Only a true knowledge of the Lord Jesus can free you from such a yoke.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Lot in the line of fire

Lot, Abram's relative, had settled in Sodom, one of the cities marching out here. That address decides everything for him:

Abram's happy lot was to have his life and his portion in a place where wars could have no influence. It was not so with his more worldly-minded relative. His position placed him right in the middle of the strife. So the outcome of this battle was of the deepest importance to him. If the child of God will stoop so low as to mix himself up with the world, he must expect to share in its upheavals.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same failure shows up as a lack of power when the fighting starts:

It is still true that the believer who settles down in the world has no power against the world. Where there is not the faith that keeps the coming glory in view, there is not the faith to overcome the present evil world. This is the case of Lot... In the end, living in Sodom, he finds that on the day of conflict he is a lonely man. He has no strength, no friends to help, and cannot count on God's support. Powerless in the day of battle, he falls captive to his enemies.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Where the world's wars are heading

One writer looks past this battle to where such conflicts end:

Genesis 14 presents the conflicts of the world — nations warring against nations. In them the believer who has refused the world gains the victory. The believer who walks by sight falls under its power. We also learn where the world's conflicts finally lead. Through the judgments of God they end in the deliverance of God's people and the setting up of the reign of Christ as Priest and King.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Position decides. Abram's tent and altar kept him outside a war that swallowed Lot; where you live decides what you get dragged into.

- Revolt without power. The five kings threw off a twelve-year yoke and lost — the godless world has little strength against the power that holds it.

- Settled, then seized. Lot did not choose this battle; he chose Sodom, and the battle came with the address. The believer who settles in the world has no power against it and stands alone on the day of conflict.

- The end of all wars. These conflicts point on to God's judgments, the deliverance of His people, and Christ reigning as Priest and King.

Genesis 14:9 · Darby

with Chedorlaomer the king of Elam, and Tidal the king of nations, and Amraphel the king of Shinar, and Arioch the king of Ellasar -- four kings with the five.

Genesis 14:9 lines up two groups of kings who met in battle near the Dead Sea. It reads like a page of ancient political history, so why is it in the Bible at all, and what has Abram to do with it?

The first battle recorded in Scripture

The Bible records no earlier battle. One writer fills in the background and explains what "king" means here:

We can have little doubt that the confusion of tongues at Babel, and the division of mankind into nations that followed, must soon have given rise to fighting and regular warfare. But we have no record of a battle in the Scriptures until we reach Genesis 14. Then four kings from the Mesopotamian district marched towards the Dead Sea, destroying cities as they went, and in the end defeated the five kings of the cities of the plain. Most of the "kings" mentioned, if not all, were leaders of single cities — what we would now call petty chiefs. Chedorlaomer seems to have been the overlord of the kings with him. He had extended his rule over the region of Sodom. The rejection of his rule was the reason for the expedition.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why Scripture bothers to record it

Far larger wars get no mention in the Bible. One writer explains why this one does:

Every detail about His own people in this world is of the deepest interest to God. That is a most precious fact. He numbers our hairs. He takes account of our tears. He remembered Paul's need of a cloak. He noticed how weak Timothy's stomach was. In God's sight a small raid matters more, when His people are caught up in it, than the mightiest military campaigns that do not touch them. This is why Scripture gives a whole chapter to Chedorlaomer's attack on Southern Palestine (Gen. 14). Many of the great wars of the ancient world, which historians write about at length, get no notice in Scripture at all.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

A portrait of the world

The alliances on both sides picture how the nations behave:

The chapter opens with a solemn picture of this present evil world. In this scene the nations form themselves into groups. They make alliances to push their own advancement, and to defend themselves from attack.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Abram outside the strife

Abram is missing from both battle lines. One writer, quoting the older wording "four kings with five," treats that absence as the point of the scene:

Here we have a very detailed account of a battle fought by "four kings with five." We may ask: what did this quarrel between "the potsherds of the earth" have to do with the history of the people of God? With Abram indeed none, in one sense, for he was outside it all. His tent marked him as a stranger to all these things. It marked him as one to whom the battle of "four kings with five" would be a matter of very small importance. His tent showed him to be a stranger on earth. His altar showed him to be at home in Heaven.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

F. B. Hole notes what became of these names outside the Bible:

At this point in the Scripture story we come to names of people that archaeologists believe they can identify from digging up the past. Some of these greater kings, such as Amraphel and Chedorlaomer, left their mark on very ancient records. But no mark of that kind would be left by Abram the pilgrim, who years before had cut himself off from their cities and their whole way of life.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the two sides picture

Commentators differ on what the two coalitions picture. One reading takes the invaders as false religion and the cities of the plain as the open wickedness that cannot resist it:

Then the king of Sodom and Gomorrah, with three other kings, went out to engage the four kings in battle (vv. 8-9), but the fleshly, ungodly world has little power against satanically inspired religion. To be properly delivered from such a yoke it is necessary to have a true knowledge of the Lord Jesus.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer notes that the verse itself makes a point of counting them, and reads the same contrast:

These four kings — and the verse calls our attention specially to the number here (v. 9) — are at war with the five petty kings of the plain of Jordan. As a type, the five stand for the world in its open and sensual wickedness. The Babylonian kings stand for the religious world-power, always seeking to hold that more open evil captive, and usually succeeding.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

A shadow of a later conflict

One writer looks forward instead, seeing this clash and its outcome as a preview:

In that conflict of the kings, four against five, Abraham's nephew, who lived in Sodom, was taken captive with all his goods. Abraham heard of this. He armed his three hundred and eighteen trained servants, chased the enemy, struck them, and rescued his nephew and all his goods, his women and his people. This no doubt pictures our Lord delivering His people by the victory of Armageddon and the deliverance of Jerusalem.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- War. The verse records the first battle in the Bible. Four eastern rulers under Chedorlaomer faced five city-chiefs who had thrown off his rule.

- Reason. This war is in the Bible because one of God's people was caught in it. Small events that touch His people outweigh great ones that do not.

- Weakness. The five could not stand against the four. Open wickedness has little strength against the religious power that holds it captive.

- Distance. Abram appears in neither battle line. His tent and altar made him a stranger to the quarrel, and he left no mark in the world's records.

- Rescue. What the armies could not do, faith did — a picture, one writer says, of the Lord delivering His people in a conflict still to come.

Genesis 14:10 · Darby

And the vale of Siddim was full of pits of asphalt. And the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah fled, and fell there and they that remained fled to the mountain.

The battle of the kings ends in a valley where the ground itself becomes the enemy. The defeat looks unrelated to Abram, yet the whole chapter hangs on it, because a believer was living in the city that lost.

The Valley and Its Pits

The valley is named twice in the chapter, and the ground itself matters. The "bitumen pits" of the verse are the "slime-pits" of older translations — natural tar springs near the Salt Sea:

One passage reads "the vale of Siddim, which is the salt sea," and another says the vale was "full of slime-pits," that is, bitumen springs (Gen. 14:3, 8, 10). It was no doubt near the Salt Sea, but its exact site is unknown.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The kings picked this ground themselves, and it trapped them. One writer reads the detail as a picture:

The valley of Siddim was full of slime pits in which the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah became trapped. This is the very picture of the ungodly, snared in their own sinful lusts, the slime of this world. Others who escaped this fled to the hill country. Yet they could hardly carry much in the way of their possessions with them.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Five Kings, and No Strength

This is the first war in the Bible, and writers read its numbers as part of the message. Four kings came against five:

The first battle recorded in Scripture is only a picture of the last great battle, still to come. Some remarkable features come to light here in Genesis 14. We read of four kings, and four suggests what is universal. These make war with the five kings, and five is the number of human weakness. The kings stand for the natural strength of man, which everyone boasts about. They also stand for the real condition underneath it, which is weakness.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Why This Defeat Is in the Book

The fighting did not stay in the distant east. God steered it close to the place where His witness lived, and the rout in this valley leads straight to verse 12:

These kings then came to a conflict, which did not rage at all in the far-off east where some of those in the strife had come from. God's deliberate hand brought it close to the spot where His witness walked. We see them in the vale of Sodom. There things came to an end that seemed final. … Now comes the connection with our story in verse 12.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Sharing the Address, Sharing the Loss

Lot is not named in this verse, but he had made his home in the plains of Sodom. The city's defeat became his own:

As long as grace enables us to walk the path of simple faith, we stand completely outside the range of this world's circumstances. But our high and holy position is that of people whose "citizenship is in heaven." If we give it up and seek a name, a place, and a portion in the earth, we must expect to share in earth's upheavals and changes. Lot had made his home in the plains of Sodom, so the wars of Sodom hit him deeply and keenly.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Settling in the world also costs a believer his strength:

It is still true that the believer who settles down in the world has no power against the world. Where there is not the faith that keeps the coming glory in view, there is not the faith to overcome the present evil world. This is the case of Lot. He never overcame, but was constantly overcome by one evil influence after another. … In the end, living in Sodom, he finds that on the day of conflict he is a lonely man. He has no strength, no friends to help, and cannot count on the support of God.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What Came Out of the Mud

The mud is not the end of the story. Out of this short conflict came something that lasts:

And note this. In Psalm 110, the oath of God made Christ "a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek." So is it wrong to say that out of this passing conflict in the slime pits of Sodom comes a spiritual result that lasts "forever"?

Modernised from J. Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Ground. Bitumen springs — natural tar pits — filled the vale of Siddim near the Salt Sea. The battlefield the kings chose was itself a trap.

- Fall. The kings of Sodom and Gomorrah sank in those pits — a picture of the ungodly caught in their own lusts. The rest escaped to the hills with almost nothing.

- Weakness. Four stands for what is universal, five for human weakness. The strength man boasts of collapses on its own ground.

- Address. God brought this war right beside His witness. Lot had moved into Sodom, so he had no strength on the day of battle and lost with the city he had joined.

- Outcome. Out of this passing defeat in the mud comes a result that lasts forever: the priesthood of Melchizedek, which Psalm 110 gives to Christ.

Genesis 14:11 · Darby

And they took all the property of Sodom and Gomorrah, and all their victuals, and departed.

Genesis 14:11 is the moment the winners collect their prize. The four kings carry off everything Sodom and Gomorrah owned, down to the food. Why does Scripture pause over an ancient border war? And what happens to a believer whose whole estate sits inside the losing city?

What the victors took

The verse lists two kinds of plunder: goods and provisions. The land itself had already done half the work of beating Sodom's army.

The valley of Siddim was full of slime pits in which the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah became trapped. This is the very picture of the ungodly being snared in their own sinful lusts, the slime of this world. Others who escaped this fled to the hill country. Yet they could hardly carry much of their property with them. The four kings took the goods and food supply of their defeated foes. They also took Lot captive, along with his goods.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Why a battle report is in the Bible

Scripture usually passes over the wars of nations. This one it tells in detail.

The history of nations and the movements of mighty kings and conquerors have always interested the Holy Spirit for one reason: their connection with the history of the people of God. He could find no pleasure in dwelling on the mere history of man. The busy strife and noise of nations could not attract the notice of the Spirit of peace. Neither could the fierce contests of ungodly tyrants grasping after power, or the movements of armies. Yet when such things became even slightly connected with the history of a "righteous soul," the Holy Spirit can be very detailed in describing the circumstances of a battle.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Nations grouping against nations

The chapter opens on alliances, campaigns and spoil. Commentators read that as a portrait of the world as it still is.

The chapter opens with a solemn picture of this present evil world. It is a scene in which the nations form themselves into groups and enter into alliances to carry out their schemes of self-advancement and to defend themselves from attack.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why Lot was inside the loss

Abram was living apart from all of this; Lot had moved his interests into the city. The loss of Sodom's goods was therefore his loss too.

His tent showed him to be a stranger on earth; his altar showed him to be at home in Heaven. It did not matter to Abram which king won the day, because his portion was not in danger through their strife. Though it was Abram's happy lot to have his life and his portion in a place where wars could not touch him. It was not so with his more worldly-minded relative. Lot's position put him right in the middle of the strife. So the outcome of this battle was bound to matter to him. If the child of God will stoop so low as to mix himself up with the world, he must expect to share in its upheavals.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The loss was total.

The kings made him a prisoner and took all his goods. He had laid up treasure for himself on earth, and the thieves had broken in. Abram was above it all, in the separating power of communion with God. Lot found himself a prisoner and a beggar.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A warning, not just a disaster

The plunder of the cities had a purpose beyond the four kings' greed.

When saints take a wrong course, they are never left without warning. Lot has settled down in the plains of Sodom, and God sends four kings to drive him out. All his coveted wealth is taken, and he himself a captive. If Lot had had faith, he would have seen in this that Sodom was no place for him. But he did not see it. The fruitful plain, the rich pasture, the world's wealth, filled his eye and his heart. Lot ignored God's warning call. Abram rescued him and recovered his wealth, and Lot settled down again in his old place. Then a heavier judgment came.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Everything carried back

Abram recovers all of it later in the chapter. The contrast between the two men is the point.

In the end Abram recovered everything, including Lot, his household and his possessions. How striking the picture, and how important its lesson for us! The man — even though he was "just" — grasped at the world with its outward prosperity and pleasures. He lost everything and found himself a captive. The man who gave up the world and walked with God was the only one in the whole region who could act in faith.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The rescue turned on a motive worth copying.

Abram reached his goal of freeing Lot. He also freed others and recovered the property the kings had taken. Do we have such energy of faith to seek to recover saints of God who have been trapped by falsehood? It was not anger against the enemy that moved Abram, but love for his brother.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Choice — Lot's position, not bad luck, put him inside the plunder. A believer who mixes with the world shares its upheavals.

- Capture — the kings took the goods, the food supply and Lot himself. The pits of their own valley trapped the losing kings.

- Loss — treasure laid up on earth was gone in a day. The man who chose the best land ended as a prisoner and a beggar.

- Warning — God sent the four kings to drive Lot out. The loss should have shown him Sodom was no place for him. He missed it.

- Recovery — everything came back through the one man who had given the world up. Love for his brother moved him, not anger at the enemy.

Genesis 14:12 · Darby

And they took Lot and his property, Abram's brother's son, and departed. For he dwelt in Sodom.

Genesis 14 tells of a war between kings. In the middle of the battle report, the verse stops to say where Lot was living — and that one clause explains why he is now a prisoner.

The Third Step Down

Lot did not arrive in Sodom in one move. Writers trace the change of wording from one chapter to the next.

It is worth noticing what happened to Lot. In an earlier chapter he chose all the plain of Jordan and "pitched his tent toward Sodom" (Gen. 13:12). He has now taken a further step on his downward course, for here we read that he "dwells in Sodom." We may be sure that it was never Lot's intention to dwell in Sodom when he pitched his tent toward it. But one false step leads to another. Drawing near to the world, he is soon in the world. And living in the world, he gets caught up in its conflicts and falls captive to its power.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Writers also note what he gave up to get there — the tent he had lived in.

Verse 12 lets us see another step in the downward course of Lot. He was not content with pitching his tent toward Sodom. He had now given up tent life altogether and taken a permanent home in the wicked city. That spot was worse than Ur, the place he first left under Abram's guidance. He now shared the fate of the people of Sodom, and the enemy carried him away captive with all his house.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why the Reason Is Recorded

The Bible records where Abraham lived and where Lot lived. Writers see purpose in that.

Is it not striking that the Spirit of God mentions in Genesis 13:12 that Abraham dwelt in the land of Canaan, and that Lot dwelt in the cities of the plain? Then in Genesis 14:12 He adds, "For he dwelt in Sodom." He says it as though to give point to what He had just recorded about Lot being carried away into captivity. No one can dwell in Sodom without breathing its poisoned air and feeling its polluting influences. Its people were wicked and great sinners before God. Poor Lot, by his associations, was helpless in the presence of the world.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Powerless on the Day of Battle

When war came, Lot had nothing to fall back on where he stood.

At last, dwelling in Sodom, the day of conflict comes. He finds he is a lonely man, without strength and without friends to help. He cannot count on the support of God. Powerless in the day of battle, he falls a captive to his enemies.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What He Lost

The raiders took his possessions along with the man.

What then were the results of this contest to Lot? Ruin to him and his family. The enemy made him a prisoner and took all his goods (v. 12). He had laid up treasure for himself on earth, and the thieves had broken through. Abram was above it all, in the power — the separating power — of communion with God. Lot found himself a prisoner and a beggar.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Abram's Response

Lot's capture became Abram's opportunity. Abram had every reason to blame him, and said nothing of the kind.

What was no small rebuke to Lot became the occasion for Abram. He came out as one who walked with God and trusted Him. He shows us, too, that power of grace which rises above whatever has personally been wrong. There was no doubt about Lot's failure in testimony. But Abram thought nothing about his faults now. What he saw was a righteous man swept away while the powers of the earth crashed together like clay pots. For no doubt Lot, despite everything, was righteous. This drew out his loving desire for Lot's rescue.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Rescue Is Not Repentance

The rescue that follows changed Lot's situation, not Lot.

In Lot's case it is made clear once more that circumstances have not made him what he is. A change of circumstances does not change him. God's hand freed him by using another man, yet he is not really free. Soon we shall find him needing rescue again — this time from a place that escaped man's judgment but falls under God's.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Drift. Lot pitched his tent toward Sodom, and then he lived in Sodom. No single step looked final, but "one false step leads to another."

- Dwelling. The verse gives the reason for the captivity: Lot was living in Sodom. Where a believer settles decides which conflicts he is caught up in.

- Powerlessness. Settled in the world, Lot had no strength against the world — alone, unsupported, and unable to count on God's help in the place he had chosen.

- Loss. He went to Sodom for gain and came out a prisoner and a beggar. The treasure he laid up on earth went to the raiders.

- Rescue. Abram, still in his tent, was free to go after him. But rescue from outside did not change Lot's heart.