Galatians 5:2–3

Galatians 5:2 · Darby

Behold, I, Paul, say to you, that if ye are circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.

Paul has just told the Galatians to stand firm and refuse the yoke of slavery. Now he names the one thing that would put it back on them. Can a believer keep Christ and add a requirement to Him? Paul's answer is that the addition cancels the benefit.

The Weight Behind the Warning

Paul signs the warning with his own name. That name carried special weight with these readers.

With great plainness of speech the Apostle warns these Gentile believers. He was the Apostle chosen to preach the gospel to the Gentiles, and God had used him to bring them blessing. For these reasons his word should have had greater weight with them than that of others. He seems to remind them of this by saying, "I, Paul, say to you that if you accept circumcision, Christ will be of no advantage to you." To be circumcised meant that they put themselves under law. And being under law meant they had to keep it to get the blessing.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What Circumcision Signalled

Circumcision was not just a physical mark. It showed which system a man was trusting, and Paul answers a slogan that was already going around.

Paul does not say that the Galatians had received circumcision, but he knew well that the Jewish teachers were trying to compel them to receive it. In Acts 15:1 we read: "Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved." These teachers were now saying these same words to the Galatians. Paul replies by the Holy Spirit, "If you should be circumcised, Christ will do you no good whatever." We must be clear that "circumcision" was the mark which separated those who trusted in the law from everyone else. It was the outward sign that a man was trusting to law… No man can trust to Christ and to circumcision, or the law, at the same time.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

The Timing of the Act

The verse is not a verdict on those already circumcised. It turns on what a person now seeks, and why.

If you should be circumcised after this, Christ will be of no advantage to you. It was not a question of those who had already been circumcised, but of Christians who now sought it. He does not mean that someone who had made the gross mistake of being circumcised could not be forgiven. He means that if they now went through that rite as necessary to their complete justification, His power was made void for them. So Christ is not only a complete Saviour; He is an exclusive one.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Addition, Not Replacement

Nobody in Galatia was proposing to drop Christ. The push was to add something to Him.

The effort of the adversary, at the beginning of the Church, was not to substitute the law and circumcision in the flesh in place of Christ, but to add them. But the apostle saw clearly, by the Spirit, that if they allowed this, all was lost. Make anything else essential, and Christ will be of no advantage to you. The Christian is one with the Head — one with Christ; let the least thing come in between them, and the body is a corpse. If anything must be added, then the work of Christ is not enough.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Helper or Saviour

The same danger shows up in a phrase we often hear today.

Christ will not take the place of a helper, to the detriment of His place as a Saviour. Any dependence on legal righteousness, moral or ceremonial, renders Christ "profitless" to us. Nothing but salvation meets our need. How often do we hear the phrase, "I know I can do nothing by myself." But this only puts Christ in the place of a helper. And He is indeed a helper to thousands who are never saved… If you look partly to yourself and partly to Christ, "Christ will be of no advantage to you."

Modernised from James L HarrisOriginal wording

The Extent of the Loss

Commentators differ on how far this loss goes. One reads it as a loss in daily life, not of salvation.

So Paul did not say that they would lose their salvation. But in practice, being circumcised would have had very serious consequences… Suppose people say, "I am saved, and now I keep the law of Moses to please God." What are they doing? They are placing themselves under a curse… It is not that Christ does not want to help them. But because of the decision they have made, He cannot help them.

Modernised from Alfred E. BouterOriginal wording

Another takes the words at their bluntest reach.

Be clear then, dear reader: the Apostle Paul, by the Holy Spirit, plainly teaches that there is no salvation for anyone who insists on receiving circumcision. Such a man shows plainly that he is trusting to the law to be justified.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- The mark. Circumcision was the outward sign that a man was trusting the law. Accepting it announced which side he was on.

- The addition. The enemy's move was not to replace Christ but to add to Him. Make anything else essential, and the whole benefit is gone.

- The timing. Paul does not condemn those already circumcised. He warns those who now seek it to be justified.

- The exclusivity. Christ is a complete Saviour and an exclusive one. He will not take second place as a helper beside your own effort.

- The loss. Writers differ on how far it goes — losing all that Christ is to you day by day, or losing salvation itself. All agree the loss is real.

Galatians 5:3 · Darby

And I witness again to every man [who is] circumcised, that he is debtor to do the whole law.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.