I wonder that ye thus quickly change, from him that called you in Christ's grace, to a different gospel,
Paul ends his greeting, and instead of his usual thanks he goes straight at the trouble. The Galatians are leaving the One who called them, and they are turning to a message Paul refuses to call a gospel.
Paul usually finds something to praise. Here there is nothing, and the silence is itself part of the message.
G C WillisVerse 5 ends the "greeting." In Paul's other letters, a word of thanks or praise usually follows, addressed to the church he is writing to. But there is no such word here. Paul does not call the Galatians "saints." It is the only letter of Paul in which this word does not appear. He does not call them "faithful brothers" or "holy brothers" as he does other Christians. But again and again he calls them "brothers." That shows the burning love that filled his heart as he wrote these severe and stern rebukes.
The abruptness matches the danger. He does not stop to build up to it.
William KellyHis heart was too agitated not to go at once to the point of their danger. So he adds no further introduction. He stays ominously silent about their state, for it really could not be spoken of. He begins at once.
The verb describes something still in motion. They had not finished the journey away, which is why Paul can still write to them.
William Kelly"So soon removed" seems to me a somewhat stronger expression than the one the Spirit of God uses. It means, in the process of removing. They were shifting, being moved away "from Him who had called them into the grace of Christ." The evil and the danger were not yet fixed. Paul could still look to God about them.
How far had the change gone, and where would it end?
A. PridhamThey had not yet abandoned the faith. But they had started a change that would surely cut them off from Christ if they kept on with it.
Paul does not say they were leaving a teaching. He says they were leaving the One who called them.
W. W. FeredayTheirs was not a slow decline after long years of professing faith. It was a very sudden turning aside. How could they be so fickle? To turn now to law was to turn from God. He had called them through Paul to grace, not to law.
They would have denied it. The charge was serious because they could not see it.
Leslie M. GrantThere was likely no thought of such a thing in their minds. They were probably quite sincere in believing they were honouring God. They thought that by obeying the law of Moses they would keep their standing before God — that is, keep themselves saved by their good works. Paul exposes it in no uncertain terms. He plainly sees the real effect of this twisting of the gospel. In the end it leaves God out altogether and makes the law the basis of blessing.
The wording matters. The call was not simply to grace as a destination. Grace was the power in which the call came.
Alfred E. Bouter"In Christ's grace" means in the power of Christ's grace. It is not, as the King James translation has it, "into the grace of Christ" — no, the call is in the power of the grace of Christ. Here the grace of Christ stands over against what we will see later in Galatians: the power of the law, which is tied to the flesh.
Paul's words sound like a contradiction. He refuses to give the new message the name it claims.
William KellyWhat were they moving on to now? A different gospel, which is not another... So if the grace of Christ was the spring and power of their calling, the gospel was the means of it. But now they had left this for something different. Notice, it does not say contrary to it, but a different one; and for that very reason he says it is not another. It does not deserve the name of another gospel. God owns only one. He permits no compromise about the gospel, and neither should we.
The same danger reaches us. The test is personal, and it is simple.
G C WillisAre you trusting Christ alone, or Christ and something else? Christ and your good works? Christ and your overcoming? Christ and your watching? Christ and the law? If you have added any of these, or anything else, to Christ, then you are just as bad as these Galatian Christians.
- Called — the call came in the power of Christ's grace. Grace was the spring of their Christian life, and the gospel was the means that carried it to them.
- Deserting — the wording shows a slide still in progress, not a finished break. That is why Paul writes at all instead of giving them up.
- From Him — they were leaving a Person, not a teaching. To turn to law after grace is to turn from God, even when the heart thinks it is honouring Him.
- Different — Paul refuses the rival message the name "gospel." God owns only one, and He allows no compromise about it.
- Deadly — Paul gives no praise and no thanks. That silence shows how serious this was. Christ plus anything leaves you where the Galatians stood.
which is not another [one]; but there are some that trouble you, and desire to pervert the glad tidings of the Christ.
Paul has just said he is amazed at how quickly the Galatians are shifting away from the One who called them. Here he names the cause, and shows why a twisted message does not deserve the name gospel.
The English wording sounds like a riddle — a different gospel that is not another. Writers explain that Paul uses two different words here. The second one refuses to dignify the rival message.
William KellyWhat were they moving to now? A different gospel, which is not another. In our English version it looks like a paradox — "another gospel, which is not another." But the language the Holy Spirit used had enough words to allow a different shade of meaning... Observe, it does not say, contrary to it, but a different one: and for that very reason he says, it is not another. It is unworthy to be called another gospel. God owns but one. He permits no compromise about the gospel; neither ought we.
The word gospel means glad tidings. One writer tests the rival message by that name.
A. PridhamIt is as if he felt that using the word "gospel" in a comparing sense dishonoured something holy. So he hurries to give God's "glad tidings" back the unique place that belongs to it. There cannot be another gospel than His own... The teaching these plunderers of the flock brought in was not a second gospel to those who understood what it meant. It brought no gladness in its sound. No joy or peace could come through a ministry that turned them from their Saviour to themselves.
Paul does not name these troublers here. They came with a demand attached to faith, and they worked at discrediting Paul himself.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThe men who had gone to the Galatian churches and disturbed them were Judaizing teachers... They taught that a simple faith in the Lord Jesus Christ is not enough for salvation. They said that to be saved you must keep the law, and that a Christian must observe the rules of the law of Moses. They put special stress on circumcision... To establish themselves, they tried to undermine Paul's apostleship, and they attacked his authority.
Paul's word is "distort" — older translations say "pervert". Notice that these teachers did not stand up and contradict the facts about Christ.
Hamilton SmithThese false teachers did not directly deny the facts of the gospel, but they perverted them. A perversion is often more dangerous than a flat denial. In a perversion there is enough truth to deceive the unwary, and enough error to make the truth of no effect.
So the size of the addition makes no difference.
Raymond K. CampbellThe Gospel is Christ's death for our sins, His burial, and His resurrection for our justification. To add one single thing to it as necessary for salvation is to pervert the Gospel.
The first thing false teaching does is unsettle people. The verb Paul uses here turns up in a much better-known place.
G. C. WillisThis is the same word as in John 14:1, "Let not your hearts be troubled. Believe in God; believe also in me." If we have true faith in Christ, then we never need to be disturbed. The storms of life may beat upon us. The servants of the enemy may bring their false teaching. But through it all, if our eyes are on Christ, we never need to be disturbed... We find this word "disturb" again in Galatians 5:10.
Commentators apply the verse far beyond Galatia. One gives a plain test.
W. W. FeredayTo put Gentile Christians under law in any shape or form is to "trouble" them, and "pervert the Gospel of Christ."
Another writer finds the same mixture everywhere.
William KellyI am fully convinced that the same Galatian evil that was active then is at work today everywhere in Christendom. It may take a slightly different form from place to place. But wherever you turn... you will find the mingling of the law in one form or another along with the grace of Christ... the same poison, here diluted, and there concentrated, is found everywhere.
- One gospel. God owns only one message of good news. A rival version is different, and unworthy of the name "another."
- One addition. The troublers did not drop Christ. They added law and circumcision to Him. Adding a single requirement for salvation is what "pervert" means.
- One tactic. A twist is more dangerous than a denial. It keeps enough truth to disarm the unwary, and empties that truth of its effect.
- One casualty. A twisted gospel first disturbs people. Jesus used the same word: "Let not your hearts be troubled." It robs them of the joy and peace a real gospel brings.
- One test today. Mix law with grace in any form, and the Galatian error is there. The diluted dose is the same poison as the concentrated one.
But if even *we* or an angel out of heaven announce as glad tidings to you [anything] besides what we have announced as glad tidings to you, let him be accursed.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.