Now when these things were completed, the princes came to me, saying, The people of Israel, and the priests and the Levites, have not separated themselves from the peoples of the lands, according to their abominations, [even] of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Jebusites, the Ammonites, the Moabites, the Egyptians, and the Amorites;
Ezra has just arrived in Jerusalem with a fresh company of exiles. The officials meet him with bad news. The people who came back have not kept themselves apart from the nations around them, and they have copied their evil practices. Even the priests are involved. How could a rescued people slide so far so fast?
The sin was not new; the arrival of Ezra's company simply brought it into the light.
H. L. RossierBut the arrival of this new reinforcement will show the state of the people who had earlier rebuilt the temple of the Lord. It is what brings to light the hidden evil that eats away at the people and holds back their spiritual growth... The surrounding world had invaded the assembly of Israel little by little. If they were not all contaminated, they were in great danger of it, because their leaders had been the first to make unholy alliances.
The failure did not belong to people far from Jerusalem. It sat at the centre, among the priests themselves.
William KellySo it was here. It was not in Babylon, but in Judea, that they were behaving like the Canaanites. It was not the people far away from Jerusalem. It was the people and the priests here who had slipped away from the will of the Lord... You will find the very worst forms of evil where you are closest to the Lord, if you are not walking with Him — if He is not keeping you. Satan aims his greatest effort against that.
The charge has two halves. They did not stay separate, and they copied what the nations did. The law had already forbidden both.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinNot only had they intermarried, but they were also copying their abominations. In doing this they chose to break the command of the Lord as given in Exodus 34:12-16. God's people were to be holy, a separated people... It was an alliance with the world. God demanded separation of Israel; He demands the same of His people in the New Testament... That God's people could sink so low shows what the heart of man is. It equally shows His infinite patience and long-suffering, bearing with them instead of judging them at once.
These marriages were more than a broken rule. They stand for friendship with the world, and the New Testament warns against that in strong terms.
Edward DennettThese marriages are a picture of alliances with the world — the besetting sin of God's people in every age. The apostle James says, "You adulterous people! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God?" and the apostle Paul cries, "Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness?" For if the Lord was pleased to say that He was married to Israel, believers now are said to be married to Christ.
The catalogue of nations in the verse is not padding. It measures the spread of the corruption.
Edward DennettSuch is man! Rather — such are the people of God when they follow the inclination of their own hearts instead of walking in obedience to His word! In the case before us it was not only the abominations of the Canaanites, the earlier people of the land. It was also those of the Ammonites, the Moabites, the Egyptians, and the Amorites — that is, every possible form of corruption.
Breaking this command was not a small slip. It struck at the Lord's own rights over Israel.
The Bible TreasuryWhat evil could be more deadly for a Jew, unless it were worshipping other gods? And it always tended that way. In itself it broke the Lord's will at the root. It gave up the separateness to Himself from the nations, and that separateness was essential to their standing as His people. They did not only throw away their privilege as the one nation of His choice. They rebelled against the rights and glory of the God who had so favoured them.
The first move is not action but humbling yourself — and one person alone can begin.
H. L. RossierThe first thing, then, is individual humiliation. It comes while we wait for the people as a whole to recognise their fault and humble themselves. This must always be so. When the sin of the people of God comes to light, we are not called first of all to take action. We are called to humble ourselves. Even if we stand alone... let us not fail to take this attitude before God. He looks on the heart that is humbled and broken, and He answers its cry.
- Report — The officials' news did not create the evil. Ezra's arrival brought a hidden growth into the open.
- Ruin — The evil was in Jerusalem, not Babylon, among the people and the priests themselves.
- Root — They broke a written command on purpose. That was rebellion against the God who had chosen them.
- Reach — Leaders led the way, and the sin spread until it covered every form of corruption around them.
- Response — Humbling comes before action. God is patient with His people, and He answers a broken heart, even one heart alone.
for they have taken of their daughters for themselves and for their sons, and have mingled the holy seed with the peoples of the lands; and the hand of the princes and rulers has been chief in this unfaithfulness.
Ezra came to Jerusalem to teach God's law, and bad news met him at once. The returned exiles — priests, Levites and rulers among them — had married into the surrounding nations, and the leaders had led the way.
The ESV calls them a holy race; older translations read holy seed. One writer builds on that word: it marks them out as God's by birth, and it brings an obligation with it.
Edward DennettThere is a reason for the introduction in this place of the word seed. It is to point out that they were a holy people, separated to God. They were born of His people Israel, whom He had redeemed to Himself on the ground of the blood of the Passover Lamb. They were therefore a "holy seed" (Ezra 9:2; compare 1 John 3:9), and as such were to maintain their holy character... No doubt this was narrowness in man's eyes, and it was sure to bring on them the charge of being unloving. But what did that matter, as long as they were acting according to God? If God sets the feet of His people in a narrow path, it is their part to keep in it if they would be in the path of blessing.
Their whole standing rested on belonging to God alone. Marrying into the nations struck at His claim on them.
The Bible TreasuryWhat evil more deadly for a Jew, unless it were worshipping other gods? And to this it habitually tended. In itself it was a basic violation of Jehovah's will. It gave up that separateness to Himself from the nations, which was essential to their standing as His people. They not only surrendered their own privilege as the one nation of His choice. They rebelled against the rights and glory of God, Who had so favoured them.
Commentators read these marriages as a picture of something that outlives Israel's history.
Edward DennettIt was therefore in wilful disobedience that they had contracted these shameful alliances with the world; for this is what these marriages typify — the besetting sin of God's people in every age. The apostle James says, "Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God?" (James 4:4); and the apostle Paul cries, "Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers... What accord has Christ with Belial?" (2 Cor. 6:14-15.)
Commentators differ on how wide Paul's words reach. One reads them of every alliance with the world; another draws a line.
William Kelly2 Cor. 6:14, "Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers," is often applied to marriage with unbelievers. But this is an error, though marriage ought to be "only in the Lord," as 1 Cor. 7 urges. The subject is the ministry or service of Christ.
The verse ends by tracing the trail back to those at the top, and that detail changes the weight of the sin.
Edward DennettIt would seem then that the princes and rulers had first set the example, and that the others had only been too ready to follow. "One sinner destroys much good," especially when that one has a place of position and influence. When a standard-bearer faints in the day of battle, the soldiers are often discouraged and quickly defeated. In the same way, once Satan has trapped a leader among God's people, he often finds it easy work to ensnare many who are less prominent.
The same pattern shows up wherever God revives His people. The world does not storm in; it seeps in.
H. L. RossierThe surrounding world had crept into the assembly of Israel. Even if they were not all contaminated, they were in great danger of it, for their leaders had been the first to make profane alliances. It is a sad thing to note that all revivals are ruined one after another by alliance with the world.
When Ezra hears the report he does not organise a reform. He tears his clothes and sits down.
H. L. RossierThe first thing, then, is individual humiliation, while waiting for the people to recognise their fault and humble themselves in a general way. This must always be so. When the sin of the people of God comes to light, our first call is not to take action, but to humble ourselves. Even if we stand alone, let us not fail to take this attitude before God. He looks on the heart that is humbled and broken and He answers its cry.
One writer turns the verse on his readers.
William Kelly"And in this faithlessness the hand of the officials and chief men has been foremost." And do you suppose that we are clear from such dangers? Not at all... all true blessing for us must begin with individual blessing, and individual blessing always has its root in self-judgment before God.
- Seed — the word marks a people born into redemption and bound to keep the holy character that came with it.
- Separateness — mixing gave up the one thing their standing rested on. It also rebelled against the God who had chosen them.
- Slippage — the world crept in; it did not attack. Commentators note that this ruins one revival after another.
- Standard-bearers — the leaders went first. One sinner with influence destroys much good, because others copy the example.
- Self-judgment — Ezra began with humiliation before God, not with a reform programme. All blessing starts there.
And when I heard this thing, I rent my mantle and my garment, and plucked off the hair of my head and of my beard, and sat down overwhelmed.
News reached Ezra soon after he arrived in Jerusalem: God's people had mixed themselves with the nations around them. He did not call a meeting or issue a rebuke. He tore his clothes and sat in silence.
Each act was a known sign of grief, used elsewhere in Scripture. But Ezra's grief reached past the people to God Himself.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinHorror seized him. Tearing his garments was how he showed his anger and grief (Genesis 37:29; Leviticus 10:6; Judges 11:35; Esther 4:1). The pulling out of the hair is also a sign of sorrow (Job 1:20; Ezekiel 7:18). But how his heart must have felt the dishonour done to Jehovah's holy Name! How deeply the sins of the people affected him!
Grief over a scandal is common. Grief over what it does to God's name is rarer, and it reaches its perfect example in Christ.
Edward DennettIt is easier to feel for God's people when their sinful conduct shames them in the eyes of the world. Only some can measure their sin as it affects the holy Name by which they are called. Only they can go down, take up and make the sin their own, and tell it all out before God. These are the people who, by the power of the Holy Spirit, are in communion with the mind of God. They share His affections for His own. So they are first and foremost filled with zeal to guard His glory. Moses, Nehemiah and Daniel are examples of this in their own measure, as well as Ezra. But all of them are only faint pictures of Him who joined Himself so closely to His people that He confessed their sins as His own. He said, "O God, you know my folly; the wrongs I have done are not hidden from you." (Psalm 69:5.)
Ezra had no part in this sin. Yet notice who he punished.
F. B. HoleHere was a man with no part at all in the evil now uncovered before him. Yet he struck himself, instead of setting out to strike the guilty parties. As the custom was in those days, he tore his clothes. That was not enough for him. He also hurt himself by pulling hair out of his head and beard — a painful process. Having done so, he sat down "appalled", or "overwhelmed". He began with himself in humiliation before God.
This order is a rule for anyone who finds wrong among God's people. It holds even when no one joins you.
H. L. RossierThe first thing, then, is that one person humbles himself, while he waits for the people to recognize their fault and humble themselves as a whole. This must always be so. When the sin of God's people comes to light, our first call is not to take action. It is to humble ourselves. We may be alone in this, like Daniel and other faithful men of the past, and like Ezra here. Even then, let us not fail to take this place before God. He looks on the heart that is humbled and broken, and He answers its cry.
There are degrees of humbling, and Ezra took the deeper one. Notice where it ended.
William KellyAnd so you see, Ezra takes a place of deeper humiliation than that. It was not just a fast now. There is this sign of a deeper humbling: he tears his garments, he sits appalled right up to the evening sacrifice, and only then does he spread out his hands to the Lord — to pray for his people as well as to confess.
Sitting stunned was not the end. Ezra waited for one hour of the day, and then he prayed as one of the guilty.
Michael HardtEzra is devastated. He tears his garments, pulls out his hair and sits down "overwhelmed". Only at the time of the evening sacrifice does Ezra find the courage to turn to God. That hour reminds us of the value of the sacrifice of Christ, and that God sees His people in Him. He turns to God not to accuse others, but to confess failure. And in this confession it is always "we" have sinned, not "they".
- Heard — A report came of God's people mixing with the nations around them. Ezra's first response was horror, not a plan.
- Torn — The torn robe and pulled-out hair were the accepted signs of grief and anger. Ezra aimed the pain at himself, not at the guilty.
- Felt — What made the sorrow so deep was the dishonour to God's holy name, felt by a man in communion with God's own mind.
- Humbled — Humbling yourself comes before acting. It holds even if you stand alone, and God answers the broken heart.
- Confessed — At the evening sacrifice he rose and prayed — saying "we have sinned", never "they".
Then were assembled to me every one that trembled at the words of the God of Israel, because of the unfaithfulness of those that had been carried away; and I sat overwhelmed until the evening oblation.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And at the evening oblation I arose up from my humiliation; and with my mantle and my garment rent, I fell on my knees, and spread out my hands to Jehovah my God,
Ezra has just heard that the returned exiles have intermarried with the surrounding nations. He tore his clothes and sat stunned. Verse 5 is the moment he moves. The timing of that move, at the evening sacrifice, is the key to the whole scene.
Ezra did not pray the moment he heard the news. He waited in the dust until one particular hour. That delay was faith: he needed a ground on which to come to God about sin at all.
Edward DennettEzra kept his place in the dust — crushed by his unspeakable sorrow — until the evening sacrifice. If on one side he was heartbroken over the people's sin, on the other he saw, by faith, the only ground of approach to God about it. He took hold of the power of the sacrifice. It was the foundation on which he could come before God and spread out before Him the wrongdoing of the children of Israel. The evening sacrifice was a burnt offering. The altar consumed all of it, and it went up as a pleasing aroma to the Lord. Once Ezra stood before Him in the value of this — in all the value of what Christ was to God in His death, pictured in advance — his intercession was certain to succeed.
Ezra's first response to the failure of God's people was not a plan of action. It was self-humbling — and writers take that order as the pattern for us.
H. L. RossierWhen the sin of the people of God comes to light, we are not called first of all to take action. We are called to humble ourselves. Even if we should be alone — like Daniel and other faithful men of former days, and like Ezra here — let us not fail to take this attitude before God. He looks on the heart that is humbled and broken, and He answers its cry.
What follows in verses 6–15 is unusual. Ezra asks God for nothing, and the sins he pours out were not his own doing.
F. B. HoleThe evening sacrifice was a small picture of the sacrifice of Christ. At that hour Ezra got up with his torn garments and fell on his knees to approach God. The prayer that follows, in verses 6-15, is remarkable. He asks for nothing in it. From beginning to end it is humble and heartbroken confession of sins that he had not shared in.
Ezra rises, kneels, and begins to speak. He does not stand apart from the guilty as their judge.
Michael HardtOnly at the time of the evening sacrifice does Ezra find the courage to turn to God. That hour reminds us of the value of the sacrifice of Christ, and that God sees His people in Him. He does not accuse others; he confesses failure. And in this confession it is always "we" have sinned, not "they".
Ezra could take the guilt of others as his own because he shared God's own feelings about His people. Writers see in that a faint outline of Someone else.
Edward DennettIt is easy enough to feel for God's people when their sinful conduct dishonours them in the eyes of the world. It is another thing to weigh their sin as it touches the holy Name by which they are called. Only those in communion with the mind of God by the power of the Holy Spirit can do that — those who share His affections for His own, those who are first and foremost filled with zeal for the keeping of His glory. Only they can go down, take up and make the sin their own, and tell it all out before God. Moses, Nehemiah and Daniel are examples of this in their various measures, and so is Ezra. But all of them are only faint foreshadowings of Him who so identified Himself with His people that in confessing their sins He said, "O God, you know my folly; the wrongs I have done are not hidden from you." (Ps. 69:5.)
The verse records his body as carefully as his words. That detail is not filler.
Frank WallaceKneeling in prayer is a physical action that shows recognition of the supremacy and greatness of the eternal God. And we have good examples — above all the Lord Jesus Christ Himself, as we see Him kneeling in the garden of Gethsemane. Bowed down with the weight of the approaching cross and all it meant, He knelt and He prayed (Luke 22:41). Paul (Acts 20:36), Solomon (2 Chr. 6:13), Ezra (Ezra 9:5) and many others bowed their knees in the presence of God or of Christ.
- Sat — his first move against sin among God's people was not a plan but grief and self-humbling, even if he stood alone.
- Waited — he stayed in the dust until the hour of the burnt offering. Sin comes to God only on the ground of a sacrifice.
- Rose — he stood in the value of that offering, which pictures what Christ was to God in His death. So his prayer was sure to be heard.
- Knelt — the verse records the bent knee and open hands on purpose. Posture shows the reverence the heart owes to God.
- Owned — his prayer asked for nothing. It was all confession, and always "we": sins he had not committed, owned as his own.
and said O my God, I am ashamed and blush to lift up my face to thee, my God; for our iniquities are increased over [our] head, and our trespass is grown up to the heavens.
The people who came back from exile have married into the surrounding nations, and the priests and leaders led the way. Ezra sat stunned until the evening sacrifice, then prayed — not asking for anything, but in shame, saying "our" for a sin that was not his.
Ezra was not one of the offenders. Yet he refuses to stand apart from them. One writer sees in that refusal the very thing that made him fit to plead for the nation.
Edward DennettHe does not separate himself, even in spirit, from those who had sinned. He and they — indeed, all the people — are one before God, counted together as one people. God Himself saw it this way. When Achan sinned, He said to Joshua, "Israel has sinned." Ezra understood this, and that is what qualified him to become an intercessor for the people with God. Unless we grasp our oneness with God's people — that their sin and sorrow are our sin and sorrow — we cannot truly carry them on our hearts before the Lord in their time of need.
A faithful man can meet failure another way: by telling God it is someone else's fault. Commentators contrast Ezra with Elijah, who told God how unfaithful Israel had been while he alone stayed true.
Leslie M. GrantInstead of this, Ezra prayed as though he was just as guilty as the rest of Israel in this sad mixing of the Jews with the nations. He confessed the sin of all as though it had been his own, though he was not personally involved in it. He saw this: Israel had sinned, and he was part of Israel. As God's priest, he was eating the sin offering (Lev. 6:25-26). That means feeling before God how serious Israel's sin was, and the priest was to count himself involved in it.
The same writer sees this most clearly in words the Lord Jesus speaks in Psalm 69:5.
Leslie M. Grant"O God, you know my folly; the wrongs I have done are not hidden from you." The Lord Jesus certainly had no sins of His own. But He took the responsibility on His own shoulders for the sins of Israel, confessed them before God, and in fact bore them "in His own body on the tree" (1 Peter 2:24).
The verse gives two measurements: sin risen higher than the head, guilt piled as high as the sky. One writer reads them as showing how far the trouble had gone, and how long it had run.
Leslie M. GrantTheir sin was far beyond their control or their ability to check it. But he does not limit his thoughts to the guilt of that moment. He confesses that it had been there "since the days of our fathers" (v. 7). Speaking this way, he remembered that such guilt had led to their captivity. Their kings and priests were handed over to foreign kings because of it, and brought down to shameful humiliation.
Ezra says he is too ashamed to raise his face, and in the same breath calls God "my God" twice. One writer pictures a person weeping over sin, dreading to look at the God he had wronged.
William J. HockingThe truth he had not grasped was that God, to whom he was answerable as a sinner, was ready to pardon. A divine invitation went out to him and to every other guilty person: "Turn to me and be saved, all the ends of the earth! For I am God, and there is no other" (Isa. 45:22). Ezra the priest confessed his own sin and the sins of his people. He acted on this invitation and lifted up his eyes to God despite his sense of guilt.
Ezra could have answered the crisis with a plan. He answered it with feeling instead.
F. B. HoleEzra called together no committee; he laid no elaborate plans for reforming this abuse; he just FELT things before God, and as they affected God. He felt things so much that he tore his clothes, pulled out his hair, and sat down astonished. Then, realising the full extent of it all, he fell on his knees and began a memorable prayer of confession: "O my God, I am ashamed and blush to lift my face to you, my God."
- Ours. Ezra does not separate himself from the offenders, even in spirit. Before God the people are one, as when God said of Achan's sin, "Israel has sinned."
- Not theirs. Elijah reported Israel's unfaithfulness and his own loyalty. Ezra prays as though the guilt were all his own — the priest eating the sin offering.
- Higher. Sin had risen past the head, and guilt to the heavens. It was past their power to control, and it reached back to the days of their fathers.
- Upward. Too ashamed to raise his face, he raises it anyway, acting on the invitation of a God ready to pardon.
- Deeper. No committee, no reform plan — he felt the failure as God felt it, and that is where his power to help his people began.
Since the days of our fathers, we have been in great trespass to this day; and for our iniquities we, our kings, our priests, have been given into the hand of the kings of the lands, to the sword, and to captivity, and to spoil, and to confusion of face, as it is this day.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And now for a little space there hath been favour from Jehovah our God, to leave us a remnant to escape, and to give us a nail in his holy place, that our God may lighten our eyes, and give us a little reviving in our bondage.
Ezra prays this right after owning his people's sin, and the first thing he does next is count the mercies. The verse holds two things together: a people still in slavery, and a people given a firm place, brightened eyes, and a small revival.
Ezra recites God's kindness for a reason.
Edward DennettHe has owned the sins of his brothers, and has declared God right in His ways with His people. Next he magnifies the grace that had visited them in their low state. That grace had brought them back to the land — only a remnant — and had allowed them once again to set up the house of their God. But why does he recite this proof of the Lord's grace and mercy? It was to show the character of His people's sin.
Where the ESV reads "a secure hold," older versions read "a nail." One writer reads it as God Himself fixing them in place.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThe remnant through His mercy had escaped, and God had given them "a nail in His holy place" (Isaiah 22:23). Like a nail in the wall, fixed and immovable, so God had established them in Jerusalem.
Another writer reads the word differently.
F. A. HughesThe word "nail" is really "tent peg." It is a small item that looks unimportant, in a place almost out of sight. Yet how vital it is to the safety of the structure!
Either way the point stands: what God gave them was small, but it held.
The exiles were back in the land. But no king ruled again in Jerusalem, and a foreign empire still held them. God blessed them inside that situation.
J. N. DarbyThe authority and the throne at Jerusalem, with the power to appoint that went with them, were not set up again. God gave no public seal of approval. Still, God blessed the remnant of His people when they were faithful. And the main thing, the thing that should stay on our hearts, is the grace that could still bless His people — grace in the middle of such ruin, and while the throne of a foreign power stood, set up because of Israel's sin.
Ezra is not describing a slavery he has escaped. One writer notes that the next verse is better read in the present tense.
Leslie M. GrantEzra deeply appreciated the great kindness of God in the small measure of recovery He had given His people, though only a remnant. He had given them "a peg" in His holy place, a small support on which to hang their confidence. The peg was to give them enlightened eyes to see the truth of God more clearly, and some measure of reviving, though they were still in bondage. Verse 9 is rightly translated, "we are slaves." Even so, God had not forsaken them in their bondage. He had extended mercy to them in the sight of the kings of Persia. His aim was that they might at least rise in spirit above their circumstances, and have the temple of God repaired and the wall of Jerusalem rebuilt. Does this not show us that even in a sadly confined state God is able to provide grace to worship Him rightly? The temple speaks of that worship. He also gives grace to be in some true measure separate from the world, which the wall pictures.
So the reviving comes to people who are still slaves.
Ezra asks only for "a little reviving." Small numbers were nothing new for his people.
Other AuthorsIsrael began as "the fewest of all peoples" (Deut. 7:7)... In the days of the exile, God raised the spirits of some (Ezra 1:5), but the revival was very limited in scope.
One writer sees Ezra's conditions in his own day.
F. A. HughesHow our hearts long to see affections stirred in loyalty and devotion to Christ and to the truth of His Word! We do not look for spectacular movements of outward greatness. We want our prayers to mingle with Ezra's, "that our God may brighten our eyes and grant us a little reviving" (Ezra 9:8). Conditions in Ezra's day were like ours in a moral sense. God's throne was no longer set up in Jerusalem. His rights were disowned, His people scattered and in captivity.
- Little. Ezra names the mercy for what it is: a remnant, a peg, a little reviving — not a full restoration.
- Fixed. The "nail" is a peg: fixed in a wall, or hidden in a tent. Either way, what God gives holds.
- Inside. The reviving comes while they are still slaves. God gives grace before He mends the ruin.
- Enough. Even in a confined state, God supplies grace for real worship (the temple) and real separation from the world (the wall).
- Convicting. Ezra recites the mercy to expose the sin. The greater the grace, the darker the sin against it.
For we are bondmen; yet our God hath not forsaken us in our bondage, but hath extended mercy unto us before the kings of Persia, to give us a reviving, to set up the house of our God and to repair the ruins thereof, and to give us a wall in Judah and in Jerusalem.
Ezra prays this after learning that the returned exiles had married into the surrounding nations. Instead of pleading their good record, he says plainly where they stand: still slaves because of sin, yet still receiving God's mercy.
The force of the verse turns on one small word. Some older English versions read "we were bondmen." Commentators say the sense is present: Ezra describes the day he lives in, not a chapter he has closed.
The Bible Treasury"For," he said, "we are slaves" (verse 9). The context, and even the verse itself, requires this — not "were," as some versions have it. People are quick to read it that way, forgetting God's ways and His people's sin. Not for a moment did he think the Jews of that day could do all that Moses or Joshua, David or Solomon, did in their days. He sought to do all that God's word authorised them to do in their actual circumstances. The all-important condition is a right sense of where God's people are, and a heart humbly set on obedience. It is not our own ideas and self-confidence trying to put everything right.
Persia's rule over them was not an accident of politics. Their own sin had put them there, and they were meant to keep that fact in view.
H. L. RossierThey were subjected to the nations because of their sins. They were to stay aware of their state until the glorious restoration of the people through the promised Messiah. … This is what irritated the proud spirit of the people in the days of Jesus. It made them dare to say to Him: "we have never been enslaved to anyone!" (John 8:33). The consciousness of our ruin should mark us today, as it marked the people in the days of Ezra. We cannot and should not deny it or shrug the burden off our shoulders.
God did not first remove the foreign empire that ruled them and then bless. He blessed them under it — and that, one writer says, is the thing to hold on to in the whole scene.
J. N. DarbyStill, God blessed the remnant of His people when they were faithful. The most prominent thing, the thing that should stay on our hearts, is His grace. In the middle of such ruin, and with the Gentile throne set up through Israel's sin, that grace could still bless His people — even though they acknowledged that throne, which God had established in judgment on them. Their position is clearly and touchingly stated in Ezra 9:8-9.
The mercy has two aims in the verse: the house of God repaired, and protection for Judah and Jerusalem. Older versions read that protection as "a wall." One writer takes both the house and the wall as pictures of what God still gives a small, limited people.
Leslie M. GrantVerse 9 is rightly translated, "we are slaves." Despite this, God had not forsaken them in their bondage. He had extended mercy in the sight of the kings of Persia, so that He might at least lift them in spirit above their circumstances, to have the temple of God repaired and the wall of Jerusalem rebuilt. Does this not show us that even in a sadly confined state, God can give grace to worship Him rightly? That is what the temple speaks of. He can also give grace to be separate from the world in some true measure. That is what the wall pictures.
Ezra is not comforting himself here. The next verse shows why he brought up the mercy at all.
Edward DennettBut why does he recite this proof of the Lord's grace and mercy? It was to show the character of His people's sin. He goes on, "And now, O our God, what shall we say after this? For we have forsaken your commandments." Then he confesses that they had sinned against both light and grace. He conceals nothing and excuses nothing.
The wall in the verse was a gift and a job at once. The years after Ezra show what became of it.
H. L. RossierEzra had foreseen that rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem had to be the next step after building the temple, if the people were to continue in the spirit of the revival (Ezra 9:9). But this had not been the case. Long years passed with no sign of activity or energy. There was nothing except growing affliction and reproach.
- Slaves. The verb is present: they are still in bondage, and Ezra refuses to pretend the past is past.
- Yet. Bondage is not desertion. God's mercy reaches them under the very Persian throne He set over them in judgment.
- Reviving. The gift is not full restoration. It is breathing space — enough to lift their spirits above their circumstances.
- House and wall. The reviving has two aims: worship restored, and a real measure of separation from the world.
- Then what? Ezra recites the mercy to expose sin, not to excuse it. The unbuilt wall shows how fast a reviving can stall.
And now, what shall we say, our God, after this? for we have forsaken thy commandments,
God had just brought a small group of exiles home from Babylon and let them rebuild the temple. In the same breath, Ezra confesses that the people have broken the very commands that set them apart. He asks a question and leaves it unanswered, because sin after such mercy has no defence to offer.
Ezra sets the sin beside the mercy that came just before it. That comparison is the point of his question.
Edward DennettBut why does he recite this proof of the Lord's grace and mercy? It was to show the character of His people's sin; for he goes on, "And now, O our God, what shall we say after this? for we have forsaken your commandments;" and then he confesses that they had sinned against both light and grace. He conceals nothing, and excuses nothing, but spreads it all out before God. He owns what would follow if they broke God's commandments again after all this mercy, and joined with these peoples in their abominations. God might well be angry with them until He had destroyed them, so that no remnant would be left.
Ezra quotes the broken commands in the verses that follow. Those who learned Scripture from him had learned something about God first.
H. L. RossierKnowing the word of God through Ezra, they have discovered in it the character of God who can in no way associate Himself with impurity. Has He not said, "You shall be holy, for I am holy" (Lev. 11:44)? And so in his prayer Ezra refers to the word of God, which he knows so well: "For we have forsaken your commandments, which you have commanded by your servants the prophets, saying, The land which you go to possess is an unclean land through the filthiness of the peoples of the lands."
Ezra had not married a foreign wife. Yet every pronoun in his prayer includes him.
The Bible TreasuryEzra was a man of prayer. His prayer held confession, thorough and holding nothing back. In a day of ruin, when we look at the state of God's people, there can be no true prayer without true confession. And true confession is not saying, "They have sinned," but, "We have sinned." "Behold, we are before you in our guilt, for none can stand before you because of this."
Something is missing from this prayer.
F. B. HoleAt the time of the evening sacrifice, the offering gave a small picture of the sacrifice of Christ. Ezra got up with his torn garments and fell on his knees to come near to God in the remarkable prayer recorded in verses 6-15. In that prayer he made no actual request. From first to last it was humble and heartbroken confession of sins in which he personally had no share.
What he holds back from asking, he leaves with God.
Leslie M. GrantNotice that Ezra does not ask forgiveness for the people, but simply confesses Israel's guilt before the Lord, leaving God to do as He sees fit with them.
Israel's separation from the nations reached into whom its people married. The Christian's position is not the same.
William KellyThe serious question was mixed marriages. Of two people already married, one had been won to Christ by the gospel and the other had not. In this the grace of Christianity stands in striking contrast to the strictness of Judaism. One of the ways Israel remained a holy people was by refusing to mix with the nations in marriage. Those who married in this way, or took foreign wives, were polluted, and their children were unclean. When they felt and judged the sin, they proved it by offering a ram for the trespass and by putting both away.
The pattern did not end with Israel.
F. B. HoleThis prayer of Ezra contains a solemn warning for us, so we do well to consider it. God has shown great mercy in the history of Christendom. Since the time of the Reformation revivals have come, but each one has been marked by the same tendency to go back to former evils. It would indeed be good if every true believer today knelt before God with words like Ezra's. Such words spring from convictions and a heart like his.
- Grace given — God left a remnant, revived them, and let them rebuild. That mercy is the measure of the sin.
- Grace forsaken — the broken commands kept Israel from mixing with the nations, for God will not associate Himself with impurity.
- Grace owned — Ezra says "we," not "they." In a day of ruin there is no true prayer without that confession.
- Grace trusted — he makes no request and asks no pardon; he states the guilt and leaves the outcome with God.
- Grace repeated — mercy, then drift back to old evils, is the recurring story. Ezra's words still fit today.
which thou hast commanded by thy servants the prophets, saying, The land, unto which ye go to possess [it], is an unclean land through the filthiness of the peoples of the lands, through their abominations with which they have filled it from one end to another through their uncleanness.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Now therefore give not your daughters to their sons, neither take their daughters to your sons, nor seek their peace or their prosperity for ever; that ye may be strong, and eat the good of the land, and leave it for an inheritance to your children for ever.
Ezra has learned that God's people have married into the surrounding nations. Priests and leaders led the way. In his prayer he quotes God's own words back to Him. This verse is the heart of that quotation. It holds a command about marriage, a warning about seeking the good of the nations nearby, and a promise for those who obey.
Ezra does not invent a rule for the crisis in front of him. He reaches for what God had already said, and those who gathered to him had learned the same thing from him.
H. L. RossierThe first effect of Ezra's self-humbling is to gather around him those who tremble at the words of God. They are marked by what they have learned under Ezra's guidance. Through him they know the word of God, and in it they have found the character of God, who can in no way tie Himself to impurity. Has He not said, "Be holy, for I am holy" (Lev. 11:44)?
Marriage can look like a private matter. One writer shows what an Israelite gave up by marrying outside the nation.
William Kelly"You have broken faith," he says, "and have married foreign women." For an Israelite, as far as the people were concerned, this was the great mark of falling away. It was falling away from God, in taking a foreign god. It was falling away from the people, in taking foreign wives. It meant completely giving up their holy place of separateness to the Lord.
The command does not stop at marriage. It also rules out working for the comfort of the nations nearby. One writer applies this to believers today, and then adds what has changed since Ezra's day.
Leslie M. GrantEzra went on in his prayer to recall that God had warned Israel not to intermarry with the nations of the land. God had even warned them not to seek the peace of those nations — that is, not to make them comfortable about living together. This is a warning for believers today. We are not to marry unbelievers. We are not to make unbelievers feel that there is no difference between us and them. Today, though, we have a positive gospel for unbelievers. We seek to win them to the Lord, so that they may be saved and share the same blessings we have.
The verse ends with a promise of three things: strength, the good of the land, and an inheritance for the children. An earlier generation lost all three.
H. L. RossierTo join themselves to the nations was to give up being set apart for Him. Ezra's companions had valued this holiness, and it had guided them up to that day (8:28). This was the very thing their predecessors had failed to keep. Such alliances — which for us match worldliness — had taken them over. They spread like gangrene from the priests and leaders of the people down to the common people themselves. They had forgotten that when separation goes, three great things go with it: strength, the enjoyment of the good things of the land of Canaan, and a lasting inheritance for themselves and their children (v. 12).
Other people broke the commands named in this verse. Yet Ezra's prayer never sets him apart from the guilty.
F. B. HoleOne striking feature runs through the whole confession. He identified himself with the people, and confessed the evils as though they were his own. From start to finish he says "we" and "us", where we might have expected "they" and "them". He also owned that the evils in front of him were old sins coming back to life — sins that had stained his people from the very beginning, or, as he put it, "since the days of our fathers". What made it worse was this: they were repeating those sins after God had shown such mercy. He had already freed them from the consequences their former sins had brought.
Confession is not the end of the matter. One writer warns about praying when action is what is needed.
The Christian's FriendAnd yet how often Satan deceives the Lord's people when evil has come out into the open. He suggests, through one person or another, "Let us pray about it." We must confess our sins. But even then we confess only as we seek grace and strength to deal with the evil and to separate ourselves from it. In this chapter Ezra lies before the Lord, owning his people's guilt. In the next chapter we see him acting with energy against the sin he had confessed, refusing to rest until he had put it away.
- Command — Ezra prays God's own words back to Him. Those who stood with him trembled at what God had said. They had learned that He cannot tie Himself to impurity.
- Cost — Marrying into the nations meant giving up their separateness to the Lord. It was a double turning away: from God, and from His people.
- Loss — When separation went, three things went with it: strength, the good of the land, and the inheritance left to their children.
- Reach — The ban on seeking the nations' peace warns against blurring the line. Today the gospel goes out to win outsiders into the same blessing.
- Response — Ezra confessed as "we", not "they". Then he acted, refusing to rest until he had put the evil away.
And after all that is come upon us for our evil deeds and for our great trespass, seeing that thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities [deserve], and hast given us such deliverance as this,
Ezra has just heard that the exiles who returned have married into the nations around them, and he tears his clothes and kneels to pray. His prayer asks God for nothing; it weighs the guilt, the captivity and the return, and says what they show about God.
The verse sits at a hinge in the prayer. Before Ezra names the present sin, he retells God's kindness. One writer explains why he takes that order.
Edward DennettThe order of Ezra's confessions is most instructive. He first owns the sins of his brothers and declares God right in His ways with His people. Then he magnifies the grace that visited them in their low estate, brought them — a remnant — back to the land, and let them set up the house of their God once again. But why does he recite this proof of the Lord's grace and mercy? It was to show the character of His people's sin... and he confesses that they had sinned against both light and grace. He conceals nothing, and excuses nothing, but spreads it all out before God.
The heart of the verse is Ezra's verdict on the exile itself. He does not call the punishment harsh. He calls it restrained. One writer explains what it was aiming at.
Leslie M. GrantAfter all Israel's disobedience and guilt, Ezra considered that God had punished them less than their iniquities deserved (v. 13). God had indeed punished them. But His purpose was to drive them back to Himself, not merely to punish them. Then He wonderfully delivered them from the harshness of that punishment by restoring them to their land.
The verse ends with what God gave: "such a remnant as this." One writer explains the picture behind that gift.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThe remnant through His mercy had escaped, and God had given them "a nail in His holy place" (Isaiah 22:23). Like a nail in the wall, fixed and immovable, so God had established them in Jerusalem.
Ezra is not confessing a new failure. He is confessing the return of an old one, and mercy makes the repeat worse.
F. B. HoleOne remarkable feature of the whole confession is that he identified himself with the people, and confessed the evils as though they were his own. From beginning to end he uses "we" and "us," where we might have expected "they" and "them." He also acknowledged that the evils confronting him were a revival of the sins that had defiled his people from the start — or, as he put it, "since the days of our fathers." But they were made worse because they were being repeated after God had shown such mercy in relieving them of the governmental consequences of their former sins.
The next verse spells out the fear behind this one. What if such mercy meets the same sin again? Ezra asks whether God would then consume them and leave no remnant at all — the very thing verse 13 says He had not done (H. L. Rossier).
One detail is easy to miss: Ezra never asks God to forgive them. One writer draws a principle from that silence.
Edward DennettIt should also be observed that Ezra does not once pray for forgiveness. With any understanding of the mind of God, it was impossible that he should do so. Suppose there is known evil in our hearts or among God's people. Our first responsibility is to judge it, not to pray for forgiveness. So when Joshua lay on his face before the Lord after Israel's defeat by the men of Ai, the Lord said, "Get up! Why have you fallen on your face? Israel has sinned."
The pattern still fits today. Hole applies it to any time of revival that has drifted back. He says believers now would do well to kneel with words like Ezra's — usually confessing as people caught up in the failure themselves, not only as people standing with those who failed (F. B. Hole).
- Deserved. Ezra weighs the exile and calls it mild. God punished them less than their iniquities deserved.
- Given. What followed the punishment was pure gift: a remnant brought home, fixed in place like a nail driven into a wall.
- Weighed. He recalls that mercy not to comfort himself, but to show what his people's sin really is.
- Owned. He says "we" and "us" throughout, confessing his people's evils as though they were his own.
- Judged. He asks for no forgiveness. Where evil is known, the first duty is to judge it, not to pray about it.
should we again break thy commandments, and join in affinity with the peoples of these abominations? wouldest thou not be angry with us till thou hadst consumed us, so that there should be no remnant nor any to escape?
Ezra has just recited God's mercy in bringing a remnant home from exile. Now he turns that mercy into a question: after such kindness, dare they break God's commandments again and marry into the nations God condemned?
The order of Ezra's prayer matters. He recites God's kindness before he names the sin.
Edward DennettFirst he owned the sins of his brothers, and justified God in His ways with His people. Next he magnifies the grace which had visited them in their low estate. That grace had brought them — a remnant — back to the land, and had let them set up the house of their God once again. But why does he recite this proof of the Lord's grace and mercy? It was to show the character of His people's sin... he confesses that they had sinned against both light and grace. He conceals nothing, and excuses nothing, but spreads it all out before God.
Intermarrying with the nations around them sounds like a social matter. For an Israelite it was a double desertion.
William KellyYou have transgressed, he says, and have taken foreign wives. For an Israelite, as far as the people were concerned, this was the great mark of apostasy — apostasy from God in taking a foreign god, and apostasy from the people in taking foreign wives. It was a complete giving up of their holy place of separation to the Lord.
The wrong was not only in what they lost, but in what they denied God.
The Bible TreasuryIn itself this broke a basic requirement of the Lord's will. It gave up that separation to Himself from the nations, which was essential to their standing as His people. They were not only surrendering their own privilege as the sole nation of His choice. They were rebelling against the rights and glory of God, Who had so favoured them.
Behind the word "again" stands what Ezra had just said. The punishment they had already borne was lighter than their guilt deserved.
Leslie M. GrantAfter all the disobedience and guilt of Israel, Ezra considered that God had punished them less than their iniquities deserved. God had indeed punished them, but His purpose was to drive them back to Him, not simply to punish them. Then He gave them a wonderful deliverance from the severity of that punishment: He restored them to their land.
Ezra names what God would be right to do, and leaves it standing.
Leslie M. GrantAfter such kindness shown by God, Ezra asks whether they should break His commandments again and intermarry with the peoples who practice these abominations. He saw this as a most ungrateful way of responding to God's grace. So he expected God to act in anger, and to consume Israel until no remnant at all was left.
Notice who Ezra puts inside the question. He is not accusing others from a safe distance.
The Bible TreasuryHis prayer held confession in it, thorough and unreserved. In a day of ruin, when we look at the state of God's people, there cannot be true prayer without true confession. And true confession is not saying, "They have sinned," but, "We have sinned."
One writer turns the same charge on Christians today, and puts it as questions rather than a verdict.
Edward DennettThe place of confession is always the place of restoration and of spiritual power. So it is always a sign of a bad condition when that place is rarely taken. Let us then challenge ourselves for a moment... Is it not true that we have largely "joined in alliance" with the people of the world? Have we not submitted ourselves to their habits, ways, and customs? Is not worldliness our ruin?
- Mercy first. Ezra names God's kindness first. That sets the measure of the sin: it was sin against grace.
- Mercy restrained. God had punished them less than their guilt deserved. He punished them to bring them back, not to make them suffer.
- Mercy repaid badly. To marry into the nations again would be apostasy twice over. It leaves God, and it leaves the separated place He gave them.
- Mercy exhausted. Ezra names the outcome himself. God would have reason to consume them, leaving no remnant and no one to escape.
- Mercy applied. True confession says "we have sinned," not "they have sinned." And the same question about mixing with the world stands over believers now.
Jehovah, God of Israel, thou art righteous; for we are a remnant that is escaped, as [it is] this day. Behold, we are before thee in our trespasses; for there is no standing before thee because of this.
Ezra's long prayer over the exiles who had married into the nations around them ends with a verdict, not a request: God is righteous, and the guilty have no ground to stand on. So the closing words raise a hard question — if my guilt leaves me unable to stand before God, what happens next?
The prayer has an unusual shape. The time of day matters, and so does what is missing from it.
F. B. HoleAt the time of the evening sacrifice, when there was a small picture pointing to the sacrifice of Christ, Ezra arose with his torn garments. He fell on his knees to approach God in the remarkable prayer recorded in verses 6-15. In it he makes no request at all. From first to last it is humble and heartbroken confession of sins he had not shared in himself.
What Ezra leaves out matters as much as what he says. He hands the whole case over to God and suggests no outcome.
Leslie M. GrantNotice that Ezra does not ask forgiveness for the people, but simply confesses Israel's guilt before the Lord, leaving God to do as He sees fit with them. He declares that God is righteous in leaving only the few Jews as a remnant. Yet because God is righteous, no one in that remnant could stand before Him, because of their guilt.
Ezra calls God righteous. He is taking sides, and he has just recalled the mercy that spared them. One writer explains why he brings that mercy up.
Edward DennettBut why does he recall this proof of the Lord's grace and mercy? It was to show what His people's sin really was. He hides nothing and excuses nothing, but spreads it all out before God. He then ends by justifying God once more, and by taking His part against himself and the people.
To stand is a word about judgment. Scripture ties it to God's throne, and to whether a sinner can hold his ground there.
C E StuartThese passages connect the thought of standing with the throne of God. Its action must go out in judgment against the sinner, unless God can forgive the guilty one. "But with you there is forgiveness," we read, "that you may be feared." Before that throne, then, the sinner in his sins cannot stand. Scripture does not teach that his standing is a bad one that he must change. It states plainly that as a sinner he has no standing before a God of judgment. He does not need a better standing, because by nature he has none at all. Apart from redemption and atonement the sinner has no standing before God's throne. What he needs is to gain one.
Ezra had not married a foreign wife. Yet from start to finish he says "we." Commentators treat this as the mark of true confession.
The Bible TreasuryConfession, thorough and unreserved, was in it. In a day of ruin, when you look at the state of God's people, there cannot be true prayer without true confession. And true confession is not saying, "They have sinned," but, "We have sinned."
Standing before God "in our guilt" sounds like a dead end. Writers on this chapter read it as the place where recovery starts and spreads.
H. L. RossierIs restoration possible at this moment for these poor escaped souls? Yes. It is found in the attitude of those who had no part in this defilement. They still take responsibility for it so fully that they identify themselves with those who remain under God's judgment. We shall see what this does. Held with a sincere heart before God, this attitude and this thorough confession of evil work on those who had sinned and bring them back.
One writer adds what it means when people stay away from that ground.
Edward DennettThe place of confession is always the place of both restoration and spiritual power. So it is always a sign of a bad condition when people seldom take that place.
- Righteous — Ezra's verdict on God comes first. He takes God's part against himself and his people instead of defending them.
- Remnant — the survivors are alive by mercy, not by merit. Ezra points to that mercy to show how serious the sin is.
- Cannot stand — before God's throne a sinner has no ground at all. Only forgiveness can give him one.
- We, not they — Ezra confesses sins he never committed. Writers call this the test of real prayer in a day of ruin.
- Restoration — the ground where no one can stand is where recovery starts. One person who takes it draws the guilty back with him.