And these are the chief fathers, and their genealogy, who went up with me from Babylon in the reign of Artaxerxes the king.
Ezra 8 opens by naming the families who left Babylon with Ezra. Verse 1 is the heading of that register, and it raises a question: why does God keep a list of names at all?
The list comes after the king had already given Ezra permission and support. One writer traces the sequence:
William KellyAfter these things, in the seventh year of Artaxerxes Longimanus, Ezra the priest went up from Babylon. With him went other Israelites of every rank, by the king's favour, with freewill offerings, and with authority for everything Ezra wanted for the house of his God... Ezra 8 then gives the family record of Ezra's companions, their fears, yet faith, and safe arrival.
Chapter 7 ended with Ezra gathering leading men to travel with him. This list follows straight on, and one writer draws out what the names themselves say about God:
Edward DennettThis genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14, and it shows how precious to God were the very names of those who answered His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet in that same grace He gladly credits to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. It was a fine company of more than fifteen hundred people.
Not everyone in Babylon went. One writer notes what happened to the names of those who stayed:
F. B. HoleGod has made sure of this. The names of those who stirred themselves to answer His call to return to the land stand on record in a lasting way. The names of those who did not stir themselves are almost entirely lost.
The king had been generous, yet few came. One writer weighs the numbers, and the faith the journey took:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinSet against the splendid decree and generosity of Artaxerxes, the company was very small. Most preferred Babylon and stayed there. The faithful ones are known to God, and their names are written here forever in His Word. The Gentile king had given the decree, and the people had plenty of all they needed. Still, the undertaking was one of faith. They came out of Babylon trusting the LORD; they marched on in faith. Notice especially that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages we read of in the next chapter were most likely the result of no women joining Ezra's expedition.
Set beside the earlier return, fewer priests and Levites answered this time:
The Bible TreasuryThe earlier return included several priests with their many households (Ezra 2:36-39); now only two volunteered, and no households are mentioned. At first no Levites offered themselves to Ezra, but this drew out his zeal, and not without fruit. Among the people, some families returned now for the first time; from other families, a further group came. From one family, the sons of Adonikam (also called Adonijah), the last of the sons appear to have gone up.
Ezra led this company at a low point in the nation's life. One writer describes what carried him:
The Bible TreasuryIt was the day of the people's humiliation. So what marked Ezra was not power, but compassion and devoted obedience. God wants reality in those He honours; He hates false pretence... In Babylon, Ezra did not have the living prophets who had cheered the early workers in Jerusalem. But his heart was set on the written word, and the hand of the LORD did not fail in gracious care, either for God and His worship, or on his journey to Jerusalem.
- Call — Chapter 7 ended with Ezra gathering leading men; verse 1 heads the list of who actually came.
- Response — Their answer came from God's grace. Yet He credits to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts.
- Record — God keeps the names of those who stirred themselves. The names of those who stayed are almost entirely lost.
- Reality — In a day of humiliation, Ezra's mark was not power but devoted obedience. His heart was set on the written word.
- Remnant — The king's decree was generous, yet the company was small. Most preferred Babylon; those who left went out trusting the LORD.
Of the children of Phinehas, Gershom; of the children of Ithamar, Daniel; of the children of David, Hattush;
Ezra 8 opens with the list of those who left Babylon with Ezra, and it begins with just three men: two priests and one son of David. Why does Scripture keep names like these, and what does it say that so few from these honoured families were willing to go?
One writer explains why God keeps a list like this at all:
Edward DennettThis genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14. It shows how precious to God were the very names of those who answered His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet in that same grace He is pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. It was a fine company of over fifteen hundred people, gathered to return to the land of their fathers. That was the land of all their traditions, and the land of all their hopes.
The silence of this record says as much as its words:
F. B. HoleSome stirred themselves to answer His call to return to the land. God has seen to it that their names are on record in a very permanent way. The names of those who did not stir themselves are almost entirely lost.
Gershom and Daniel were priests. When Ezra looked over the company he had gathered, the count troubled him:
Edward DennettThere were two priests, but only two: Gershom, son of Phinehas, and Daniel, son of Ithamar. From the Levitical family, outside the priesthood, there was not a single one. Ezra might well be concerned, for it was a sad sign of the state into which the people had fallen. The priests alone had access to the holy place of the house of their God. The Levites alone were the appointed ministers in everything belonging to its service. Yet when the call came that they might return and take up their privileges again, they stayed unmoved and indifferent.
Another writer asks where these Levites had put down roots:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinWhile a small number of Levites had gone up with Zerubbabel, none had joined Ezra. Only two priests were present, Gershon, son of Phinehas, and Daniel, son of Ithamar. What indifference this reveals! They had settled down in the enemy's land and were satisfied to remain there. They were minding earthly things, and the things of God were forgotten by them. Still they were Levites in their holy calling. It is the same today with many who are no doubt saved, but who are worldly-minded and have little desire to live in the separation He requires from His people.
One name in this verse is not priestly at all. Hattush is identified elsewhere as "son of Shemaiah, a descendant of David" (Morrish Bible Dictionary). Why did God keep Judah and David's family alive through the exile at all? One writer answers:
The Bible TreasuryWhy is Judah in captivity preserved as a people? Why not scattered and lost among the nations, as the ten tribes are? Because God had a purpose of grace to carry out, and full judgment was delayed. God had set David upon the throne, and it was a pledge that Christ must sit there also. For Christ on the throne of David is God's centre of blessing for this earth. So the tribe the King was to come from is kept safe until the appointed time, when Jesus is born in Bethlehem. During the captivity, when the Gentile held the throne, the line of true heirs was kept as something sacred. After the return from Babylon, Matthew carries that line on to the birth of Christ, and in Him it ends.
The same thought cuts off any idea that the returning remnant earned their place:
William J HockingThere was no merit whatsoever in them. God delivered the remnant from captivity because His word must be fulfilled, above all His promise about the Lord Jesus Christ. That the promised Branch might shoot forth, the house of David must be restored.
Every name in this register belonged to someone who gave up the familiar:
Michael HardtThe men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been so much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia, where they had grown up. But they return to the place of God's choice, and God is with them.
- Grace first. The willingness to go was God's own work in them, and He then credits it to them as theirs.
- Grace named. God recorded those who answered; the names of those who stayed are lost.
- Grace's gap. Only two priests came, and not one Levite. The rest traded privilege for comfort in Babylon.
- Grace's purpose. A son of David among the returning few shows why Judah survived at all: God had pledged David's throne to Christ.
- Grace's cost. Every name on the list chose the harder road to God's chosen place — and God went with them.
of the children of Shecaniah, of the children of Parosh, Zechariah, and with him were registered by genealogy of the males a hundred and fifty.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Of the children of Pahath-Moab, Elihoenai the son of Zerahiah, and with him two hundred males.
Ezra 8:4 is a single line in a register: a family name, a leader, his father, and a head count of the men who travelled with him. It looks like an office record, so why did God keep it in Scripture?
The list in verses 1–14 is not filler. Names drop out of history all the time. These did not.
F. B. HoleThe first fourteen verses give the names of those who went with Ezra. They are listed by family line, with the number of the men in each family. God has seen to it that the names of those who stirred themselves to answer His call to return to the land stand on record in a very lasting way. The names of those who did not stir themselves are almost entirely lost.
Eliehoenai answered a call. Even the willingness to answer came from somewhere else.
Edward DennettThis genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14. It shows how precious to God were the very names of those who responded to His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet in that same grace He is pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. It was a fine company of over fifteen hundred people, gathered to return to the land of their fathers. That was the land of all their traditions, and the land of all their hopes.
Two hundred men is a large household. The number looks different next to what the king had offered.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThe names of those who gathered around Ezra and went up with him are recorded here. In view of the magnificent decree and generosity of Artaxerxes, the company was very small. The majority preferred Babylon and stayed there. The faithful ones are known to God, and their names are written here forever in His Word. The foreign king had given the decree. The people had a full supply of everything they needed. Even so, the undertaking was one of faith. They came out of Babylon trusting the LORD; they marched on in faith.
These families had not all stayed away together. Some of them had already sent people home in the earlier return.
The Bible TreasuryThe earlier return included several priests with their many houses (Ezra 2:36-39); now only two volunteered, with no mention of their houses. Of the people, some fresh families now returned; of other families a fresh part.
The comfortable option was always available. Those listed here refused it:
Michael HardtThe men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia, where they had grown up. Instead they return to the place of God's choice (Deut 12), and God is with them.
The verse counts men only. That is about the public record, not about God's view of women.
Leslie M. GrantThis list records those who came of their own will to go with Ezra to Jerusalem. The men numbered almost 1500. Women must also have been present, but are not mentioned. This does not mean God thinks less of the faith of women. He often commends them for their devotion. But the emphasis here is on a public record, and women do not hold a public place, so there was no reason to mention them. Children too are not mentioned. In fact, the emphasis in verse 1 is on "the heads of their fathers' houses," showing God's vital interest in households.
Commentators differ on whether any women made the journey at all. One writer links their absence to trouble that came later:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinNotice especially that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages we read of in the next chapter were most likely the result of the fact that no women had joined Ezra's expedition.
Israel was small, scattered and under a foreign king. That is exactly why these records mattered.
William KellyNotice this principle. It was a day of weakness and humiliation. Even so, it was not to be a day of neglect, but of the greatest care. God's people were to be as watchful for His name as in the days when everything stood in the full power and beauty of divine order.
- Called. God called His people back to the land. Most preferred Babylon and stayed, and their names are almost entirely lost.
- Answered. Two hundred men of one household came. God Himself had produced that willingness in their hearts.
- Recorded. God put their names in His Word forever, and credited to them what His own grace had worked.
- Household. The list runs by heads of fathers' houses, because God cares about whole families, not just single people.
- Careful. A weak day was no excuse for neglect. It called for the greatest care over who belonged.
Of the children of Shechaniah, the son of Jahaziel, and with him three hundred males.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And of the children of Adin, Ebed the son of Jonathan, and with him fifty males.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And of the children of Elam, Isaiah the son of Athaliah, and with him seventy males.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And of the children of Shephatiah, Zebadiah the son of Michael, and with him eighty males.
Ezra 8:8 sits inside a roll call of the families who left Babylon with Ezra. Zebadiah is one name of fourteen, and the writers ask why God kept this list, why so few came, and what the journey cost.
The register runs to the end of verse 14. One writer reads the whole list as proof of how God values those who answer Him.
Edward DennettThis genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14. It shows how precious to God were the very names of those who answered His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet by that same grace He is pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts.
The same writer, commenting on the earlier register in chapter 2, draws out what such a record is for:
Edward DennettHe looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. The very names of His people are known and announced. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
Some houses in Ezra's list are new. Others, like this one, sent a fresh group from a family that had already gone up before.
The Bible TreasuryAt first no Levites offered themselves to Ezra; but this drew out his zeal, and not without fruit. Of the people, some fresh families now returned; of other families, a fresh part.
The verse names Zebadiah, his father Michael, and his family head Shephatiah — three generations in half a line. The earlier return grouped many people by their home towns instead.
H. L. RossierIn this new exodus, part of the people who had stayed in the province of Babylon go with Ezra. Like their leader, these people have an exact genealogical record. Scripture lists every one of them by family, not by city as it did for part of the group in Ezra 2. In the first great movement of restoration, there had been little doubt about the right of individuals to belong to the people of God. Here it seems necessary to be even stricter than at the beginning.
Leaving was the harder choice. One writer names the easier option these men turned down.
Michael HardtThe men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia, where they had grown up. But they return to the place of God's choice (Deut 12) and God is with them.
The totals in this list are small. One writer sets them beside the king's generous decree.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinArtaxerxes gave a magnificent decree and was very generous, yet the company was very small. The majority preferred Babylon and stayed there. God knows the faithful ones, and their names are written here forever in His Word. The Gentile king had given the decree, and the people had all the supplies they needed. Even so, the undertaking was one of faith.
Each entry in this register, verse 8 included, counts males. Commentators differ on what that silence means. Gaebelein takes it at face value and links it to the crisis that breaks out in the next chapter: "It must be especially noticed that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages of which we read in the next chapter most likely were the result of the fact that no women had joined Ezra's expedition." Another writer reads the omission as a matter of public record rather than absence:
Leslie M. GrantWomen must also have been there, though the list does not mention them. This is not because God thinks less of the faith of women. He often commends them for their devotion. But the emphasis here is on publication, and women do not hold a public place, so there was no reason to refer to them.
- Called — the return started with God's call. The answer in these men's hearts was His own work before it was their choice.
- Counted — God kept a record of who answered: family, father, and number. Zebadiah's eighty are not a footnote but a record He chose to keep.
- Costly — these men grew up in Mesopotamia. Every one of them walked away from the easier option, and the small totals show most of their countrymen did not.
- Continued — some families had already gone up years before. Verse 8 is a fresh part of one of them answering later, so a slow start is not a closed door.
- Credited — God sees the smallest fruit of His own work with joy. He publishes it to encourage anyone staying faithful when everything around has gone wrong.
Of the children of Joab, Obadiah the son of Jehiel, and with him two hundred and eighteen males.
One short line in a long register: a family name, one leader, and a count of 218 men. It belongs to the roll of those who left Babylon with Ezra. Why would God keep such a list at all?
No one forced these men to go. The names in verses 1–14 belong to people who chose to leave a settled life and travel back to Jerusalem. The count lists only the men.
Leslie M. GrantThis list records those who came of their own free will to travel with Ezra to Jerusalem. The men numbered almost 1500. Women also must have been present, but are not mentioned. This does not mean God thinks less of the faith of women. He often praises them for their devotion. But the point here is a public record, and women did not hold a public place, so there was no reason to name them. Children too are not mentioned. In fact, verse 1 puts the emphasis on "the heads of their fathers' houses." This shows God's deep interest in households.
Obadiah's name survives because God wanted it to survive. And the willingness that put him on the list was itself something God had worked in him first.
Edward DennettThis genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14, and it shows how precious to God were the very names of those who responded to His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet by that same grace He is pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. It was a fine company of over fifteen hundred people, gathered to return to the land of their fathers — the land of all their traditions and the land of all their hopes.
Ezra's list catches families at different stages of coming out. Some names here are new. Others belong to families that had already sent part of their number home.
The Bible TreasuryAt first no Levites offered themselves to Ezra; but this drew out his zeal, and not without fruit. Of the people, some fresh families now returned; of other families a fresh part.
This list is arranged differently from the one in Ezra 2. Here each man is placed by family, and each could show his exact line.
H. L. RossierIn this new exodus, Ezra is accompanied by part of the people who had remained in the province of Babylon. These people, like their leader, have an exact record of their family line. Scripture mentions all of them according to their families and not, as with part of those in Ezra 2, according to their cities. In the first great movement of restoration there had been fairly little doubt about the right of people to belong to the people of God, and that doubt was mostly about the priesthood. But here it seems necessary to be even stricter than at the beginning.
Leaving cost these families something. They had grown up in Babylon, and staying would have been the easy choice.
Michael HardtThe men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been so much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia where they had grown up, but they return to the place of God's choice (Deut. 12) and God is with them.
This list comes from a day of humiliation for the nation. Ezra led it without power of his own.
The Bible TreasuryAs it was the day of the people's humiliation, not power but pity and devotedness in obedience marked Ezra. God will have reality in those He honours; false pretensions He hates... Ezra in Babylon did not have the living prophets who had cheered the early workers in Jerusalem. But his heart was set on the written word. And the hand of the LORD did not fail in gracious providence, either for God and His worship, or on his journey to Jerusalem.
- Called. They went up in answer to God's call at a low moment. That answer was itself the fruit of His grace in their hearts.
- Costly. Settling in the country where they had grown up would have been far easier; they left it for the place of God's choice.
- Counted. These were volunteers, listed as heads of fathers' houses — nearly 1,500 men. Wives and children go unnamed, yet the record shows God's interest in whole households.
- Credited. God recorded the very names of those who answered, crediting to them what He Himself had produced in them.
- Continued. Some families here were returning for the first time; others sent a fresh group after an earlier one. Families come out in stages, and the later stage is checked more strictly.
And of the children of Shelomith, the son of Josiphiah, and with him a hundred and sixty males.
This verse is one line in a roll call. Shelomith, son of Josiphiah, brings 160 men out of Babylon to Jerusalem with Ezra. Why does God write such people down by name? And what did it cost them to be on the list?
Verse 10 sits inside a list that runs from verse 1 to verse 14. Ezra records it as the genealogy of those who travelled with him. One writer explains why such a list exists at all, and finds grace at both ends of it:
Edward DennettThis genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14, and it shows how precious to God were the very names of those who responded to His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. But by that same grace He is glad to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. It was a fine company of over fifteen hundred people, gathered to return to the land of their fathers. It was the land of all their traditions, and the land of all their hopes.
Shelomith's 160 men are part of that fifteen hundred, and their names were precious to God.
Shelomith and his men were free to stay. Going meant leaving the country where they had grown up:
Michael HardtThe men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been so much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia, where they had grown up. But they return to the place of God's choice (Deut. 12), and God is with them.
Ezra had a generous decree from Artaxerxes and ample supplies. That did not remove the risk, and it did not swell the numbers:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThe names of those who gathered around Ezra and went up with him are here recorded. Artaxerxes had given a magnificent decree and been very generous, yet the company was very small. The majority preferred Babylon, and remained there. The faithful ones are known to God, and their names are here written in His Word for ever. The foreign king had given the decree, and the people had everything they needed. Even so, the venture was one of faith. They came out of Babylon trusting the LORD; they marched on in faith.
The list shows an uneven pattern. Some families appear in it for the first time. Others had already sent part of their number in an earlier return, and now send more:
The Bible TreasuryOf the people some fresh families now returned; of other families a fresh part.
The door out of Babylon stayed open. A household could still walk through it later.
Each entry, including this one, counts males. Commentators differ on what that silence means. One reads the emphasis as falling on public representation and on households:
Leslie M. GrantWomen also must have been present, but are not mentioned. This is not because God thinks less of the faith of women. He often praises them for their devotion. But the emphasis here is on the public record, and the women do not hold a public place, so there was no reason to mention them. Children too are not mentioned. In fact, the emphasis in verse 1 is on "the heads of their fathers' houses," showing God's vital interest in households.
Another writer links the all-male list to the trouble that breaks out in the next chapter:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinNotice especially that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages we read about in the next chapter were most likely the result of no women joining Ezra's expedition.
The character of this return was not strength in numbers but obedience in a low moment:
The Bible TreasuryAs it was the day of the people's humiliation, not power but pity and devotedness in obedience marked Ezra. God will have reality in those He honours; false pretensions He hates.
- Called. The list exists because the names of those who answered God's call at that moment were precious to Him.
- Costly. Answering meant leaving the country where they had grown up for the place of God's choice. Staying would have been far easier.
- Counted. Shelomith's 160 men are one entry in a company of about fifteen hundred. The number was small next to the king's generous decree, because the majority preferred Babylon.
- Credited. The response was itself the fruit of God's grace. Yet He credits to His people what He Himself produced in their hearts.
- Continuing. Some families appear here for the first time; others send a further part. The way out of Babylon stayed open to any household willing to take it.
And of the children of Bebai, Zechariah the son of Bebai, and with him twenty-eight males.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And of the children of Azgad, Johanan the son of Hakkatan, and with him a hundred and ten males.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And of the children of Adonikam, the last ones, whose names are these Eliphelet, Jeiel, and Shemaiah, and with them sixty males.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And of the children of Bigvai, Uthai and Zabbud, and with them seventy males.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.