And in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of Jehovah by the mouth of Jeremiah might be accomplished, Jehovah stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, and he made a proclamation throughout his kingdom, and also in writing, saying,
The book of Ezra opens with a date, a prophecy, and a foreign king. They seem unrelated until you see who holds them together. The exiles in Babylon had lost everything. Yet this verse says the deciding factor was not politics, but a word God had spoken seventy years earlier.
Commentators point out that the seventy years were not a rough guess. God fixed the term before the exile began.
Hamilton SmithSeventy years before their return, the prophet Jeremiah, who lived in the closing days of the kingdom of Judah, had foretold that judgment would overtake the nation. Because of their wickedness they would be carried off into captivity at Babylon, and their land would be left in ruins. Even so, the prophecy said that after seventy years the LORD would bring them back to their land. The book of Ezra opens in the first year of Cyrus, king of Persia — seventy years after the Captivity. At that time, so that the word of the LORD by Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus, who issued a proclamation to the people of God setting them free to return to the Land to "build the house of the LORD God of Israel."
The king in this verse was no surprise to God. God named him long before Babylon took Jerusalem.
Edward DennettThis prophecy came long before Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem, and at least a hundred years before God called Jeremiah to his work as a prophet. So it shows that the eye and heart of God are always on His people and on their interests. It shows too that the public events of the world — the rise and fall of empires, the coming of mighty conquerors — are only the instruments of His power. Through them He works on through the governments of the world to fulfil His own purposes for His people on earth. How calmly, then, the children of God may rest amid political confusion and strife! In this way God had marked out, by the mouth of Isaiah, two hundred years before the event told in our chapter, the man He had chosen to restore His people and to build His house at Jerusalem.
Writers note that knowing the facts about God's plan is not the same as being moved by God.
H. L. RossierBut none of this was enough to bring the captives back: not these convictions of the mind (which might have nothing to do with a work of conscience or a living faith), and not even his certainty that God had chosen him as an instrument to carry out His plans (v. 2). God meant to show that it was He Himself and no other who fulfilled His Word. That is why it says: "the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia" (v. 1).
The same phrase returns four verses later, this time about the people themselves.
Michael HardtIt is remarkable how God works. First He "stirs up the spirit" of this pagan king, so that he passes a decree inviting the Jews to return to Jerusalem. He then stirs up the spirit of those who went (Ezra 1:5). Whatever men do, a true revival is always a work of God.
Something has changed in how God deals with His people. He now acts through the empire that rules them.
Edward DennettIn these books God is no longer seen stepping openly into the affairs of His people. He works, as it were, behind the scenes. At the same time He recognises the new order that He Himself has set up, and He uses the Gentile kings, into whose hands He had put the rule of the earth, to carry out His purposes.
While God stirred Cyrus, an old man in Babylon was praying. One writer names the three men God used, and how each one served.
H J VineSo to fulfil this promise God used Jeremiah in prophecy, Daniel in prayer, and Cyrus — a man who did not know the Lord — in providence.
What guided Daniel matters, because nothing around him looked hopeful.
Hamilton SmithHe discovers "by books," not by circumstances, that God would visit His people in captivity and open a way for them to return to their land. He has just seen the king of Babylon destroyed and his empire fall. But he does not guess at the meaning of the stirring events around him, or try to draw from them conclusions that favour God's people.
Those who came back were only a small remnant. Their story is left as an example.
H. L. RossierThe Holy Spirit presents those who returned as showing the marks that a believing remnant should take on in a time of ruin. They are a very healthy example for us — an example that teaches us how we may be witnesses of God in difficult circumstances.
- Word first. Seventy years earlier God spoke through Jeremiah. Ezra 1:1 names that word as the reason anything happens at all.
- Word names. The same word had named Cyrus before his birth, so the rise of an empire was only an instrument in God's hand.
- Word stirs. Cyrus was convinced in his mind, but that was not enough. God stirred his spirit, and then the people's too.
- Word hides. From Ezra on, God is no longer seen acting in the open. He works behind the scenes through the Gentile kings.
- Word answers. Jeremiah prophesied. Daniel prayed, guided by the books and not by the news around him. Cyrus acted without knowing God — one word carried by three men.
Thus says Cyrus king of Persia All the kingdoms of the earth has Jehovah the God of the heavens given to me, and he has charged me to build him a house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah.
A Persian emperor, fresh from taking Babylon, issues a decree in the name of Israel's God — the God whose prophet had named him two centuries earlier. The verse raises two questions at once: what did Cyrus actually understand, and why does he call the LORD "the God of heaven" rather than the God of Israel?
One writer sets the prediction and its fulfilment side by side.
F. B. HoleOpen the book of Ezra, and we go back to the first year of that great king. The prophet Isaiah had mentioned him by name some two centuries before he came to the throne. If we turn to Isaiah 44:28, we read the prediction of what he would do. Ezra 1:2 records his doing what Isaiah foretold.
So the "charge" in the decree points back to a prophecy already in writing.
The Bible TreasuryHow powerfully Isaiah's prophecy must have struck a mind so thoughtful! No sceptics were on hand to whisper their doubts. Daniel was there too, to point him to Jeremiah. It was not policy but Jehovah that stirred up the spirit of Cyrus, as He did that of the chief fathers of the Jews. The conqueror of Babylon proclaimed a kind of jubilee to the captives — but with one stated aim: to build Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. Who but an enemy of God's word can doubt that Isaiah 44:28 was his "charge" from Jehovah?
Cyrus uses the title that runs right through this part of Scripture. It marks a change in how God dealt with His people.
William KellyGod is given the distinct title "the God of the heavens" (Dan. 2:18, 37, 44). It comes again in Ezra 1:2, Ezra 5:12, Ezra 6:9-10, Ezra 7:12, 23, Neh. 1:4-5, Neh. 2:4, and also in 2 Chronicles 36:23. His people had fallen away to idols. In that state it did not suit His nature and majesty to act at their head or among them as "the Lord of all the earth." (Joshua 3:11)
Cyrus was not alone among the Persian kings in using it.
H. L. RossierCyrus, like the kings of Persia who followed him, hated idols. Acknowledging the God of Israel as "the God of the heavens", he insists here that "he is God" (v. 3). In the same way Artaxerxes, king of Persia, later openly declares that the Lord God of Israel is "the God of the heavens" (Ezra 7:21, 23).
Cyrus credits the LORD with giving him his empire. Does that make him a believer?
The Bible TreasuryIn Cyrus we do not see the power of faith, but, just as Nebuchadnezzar carried out God's work, so Cyrus is the servant of His mercy to bring the Jew back to the land. In himself he goes further than Nebuchadnezzar. He says (Ezra 1:2, etc.) that the Jehovah-God had given him the kingdoms of the earth, and a charge to build the house at Jerusalem. Whether this confession of God's sovereignty came from a saving faith is another matter. God is able to make the world confess His power and authority... The point is not what Cyrus was in himself, but his work.
A king convinced of his mission could not bring the captives home by himself.
H. L. RossierBut all this was not enough to bring the captives back. These were convictions of the mind, and they might have nothing to do with a work of conscience or a living faith. Even the assurance of being an instrument chosen to carry out God's designs (v. 2) fell short. God meant to show that it was He Himself and no other who fulfilled His Word. That is why it says: "The LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia" (v. 1). He also stirred up the spirit of the chief fathers of Judah and Benjamin and the spirit of the priests and of Levites (v. 5).
The decree does three separate things, and the commission in verse 2 is the first of them.
Edward DennettThree things are announced here. First, the commission Cyrus himself had received about the Lord's house. Second, his royal permission for any of the Jews to return to Jerusalem to build the temple. Third, his invitation to those Jews who would stay in his lands to join those who left, by freewill offerings toward the object they had in view.
That single purpose shaped everything that followed, including what still had to be done afterwards.
Hamilton SmithIn the first instance, God delivered a remnant of His people from captivity and brought them back to the Land, under Zerubbabel, in order to build the house of the Lord (Ezra 1:2-3). But once the house was built, it became necessary to build the walls and set up the gates to guard the sanctity of the house of the Lord.
- Word. Isaiah named Cyrus some two centuries early. Verse 2 records him doing what was foretold, and his "charge" traces back to Isaiah 44:28.
- Title. "God of heaven" is the name used all through Ezra, Nehemiah and Daniel. His people had fallen away to idols, so it no longer suited Him to act among them as Lord of all the earth.
- Confession. Cyrus owns that the LORD gave him his kingdoms. Yet the writers leave open whether this was saving faith: what counts here is his work, not the man.
- Stirring. Conviction was not enough. The LORD stirred Cyrus's spirit, and then the spirits of the chief fathers, the priests and the Levites.
- House. The commission, the permission to return, and the freewill offerings all serve one aim: the house of the Lord at Jerusalem.
Whosoever there is among you of all his people, his God be with him, and let him go up to Jerusalem, which is in Judah, and build the house of Jehovah the God of Israel -- he is God -- which is at Jerusalem.
The seventy years of exile are over. A Persian king's decree opens the road home. But it names no one and commands no one. It leaves the door open to whoever will walk through it.
Cyrus was not a worshipper of Israel's God, yet his edict speaks with unusual confidence about what God had charged him to do. Commentators note how much this pagan ruler was willing to say out loud.
F. B. HoleIt was no small thing for Cyrus to acknowledge the supreme glory and power of God in this striking way. It was no small thing that he obeyed what God had commanded. It is not surprising that God should have spoken of him as "His anointed."
The proclamation as a whole holds three separate things together, and it is worth keeping them distinct.
Edward DennettThree things are announced here: the commission which Cyrus himself had received about the Lord's house; his royal permission for any of the Jews to return to Jerusalem in order to build the temple; and lastly, his invitation to those Jews who would stay in his territories to have fellowship with those who left, by giving freewill offerings toward the goal they had in view.
The decree singles out nobody. That silence did its own sorting work.
F. B. HoleThe proclamation did not name any person or persons who were to go to Jerusalem and build the house. Instead it threw the door open for any Jew whose heart stirred him up to go. Such a man had the assurance that he would receive generous help in the project ahead of him. Worded this way, it meant that those who responded would mostly be men of piety, whose hearts were alive to the glory of God and to the place of His Name. The more worldly-minded and selfish would prefer to stay in their comfortable homes, built up during the seventy years of captivity. They would leave the task to others who were ready to face the difficulties and hardships.
It was an invitation, not an order. So it showed what people really loved.
Hamilton SmithThis proclamation became a test of the moral condition of the people of God. On one side, it raised a question. Were their affections so set on their land, their God, and the house of God that in simple faith they were ready to face trials and difficulties, opposition and reproach? Were they ready to answer to the mind of God and carry out His will? Or on the other side, did they prefer to stay in Babylon with its ease and material comforts?
The verse pauses to say whose house this is. That short phrase carries weight, and so does the practical help attached to it.
Leslie M. GrantNotice, he does not give any honour to the idols of Persia, but says of the God of Israel, "he is the God" (v. 3). He also gave instructions to the neighbours of anyone concerned about taking this journey to Jerusalem. They were to "help him with silver and gold, with goods and with beasts, besides freewill offerings for the house of God that is in Jerusalem" (v. 4). This was not only a matter of setting slaves free, but of enriching them. So Cyrus was rightly representing a God of grace.
The goal here is a building project, and a narrow one. The ruined city walls are not yet on the agenda.
F. B. HoleWhat Cyrus had in view was the building of "the house of the LORD," and he was not concerned with the desolate state of the city. Later, Nehemiah became deeply concerned about the ruined and desolate condition of Jerusalem. He obtained permission from Artaxerxes to restore and build the city. It was a case of God's house first, the city where men dwell second. This is a principle of lasting significance.
The ones who answered were a minority, and their reasons were not practical ones.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinNot everyone was ready to go back; only a small remnant was willing. The great majority preferred to stay in Babylon. There was nothing to attract them to Jerusalem — a city of ruins, with the once magnificent temple in ruins. Those who returned loved Jerusalem, the place the LORD had chosen. There, and nowhere else, the people could bring the appointed offerings and sacrifices. They belonged to those who sat by the rivers of Babylon and wept when they remembered Zion. They said, "If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its skill! Let my tongue stick to the roof of my mouth, if I do not remember you, if I do not set Jerusalem above my highest joy!" (Ps. 137:5-6).
Writers read the open-ended question of this verse as one that has never been withdrawn.
Michael HardtIn a sense, King Cyrus is still alive. The same call still goes out. Who is there among you? Who is there who is not content with Babylon? Who is there who values Jerusalem? Who is there who takes an interest in the house of God?
- Charged — Cyrus did not worship the God of Israel, yet he acknowledged His glory and power and obeyed what God had commanded. God called him "His anointed."
- Opened — The decree names no one and drafts no one. It opens the door to "whoever is among you of all his people."
- Tested — An invitation, not an order, exposes the heart: comfort in Babylon, or the trouble and reproach of going up.
- Built — The stated object is the house of the LORD, not the city walls. God's house comes first; the city where people live comes second.
- Answered — Only a small remnant went up. They loved Jerusalem more than comfort, and the same call still asks who will go.
And whosoever remains in any place where he sojourns, let the men of his place help him with silver, and with gold, and with goods, and with beasts, besides the voluntary offering for the house of God which is at Jerusalem.
Cyrus's decree does not stop with permission to leave; its final clause turns to the people who will stay behind and tells them to fund the ones who go. It names two kinds of gift: supplies for the traveller, and a voluntary gift for the house of God. So who really has a share in this work?
The verse ends a proclamation that moves outward in three stages: the king, the willing, and those who stay. One writer sets out the structure:
Edward DennettThree things are announced here. First, the commission Cyrus himself had received about the Lord's house. Second, his royal permission for any of the Jews to return to Jerusalem to build the temple. Last, his invitation to the Jews who would remain in his lands: they could have fellowship with those who left, by freewill offerings towards the object they had in view.
So the Jew who stays behind — "in whatever place he sojourns" — is not excused. He is invited into the same purpose as the man who travels.
Cyrus lets the captives go, but not empty-handed. He tells their neighbours to send them off with silver, gold, goods and beasts. One writer sees the God behind the king's words:
Leslie M. GrantNotice, he does not give any honour to the idols of Persia, but says of the God of Israel, "He is God" (v. 3). He also told the neighbours of anyone concerned about this journey to Jerusalem to assist him "with silver and gold, with goods and with beasts, besides freewill offerings for the house of God that is in Jerusalem" (v. 4). This was not only a matter of liberating slaves, but enriching them. So Cyrus rightly represented a God of grace.
Note the distinction the verse itself draws. The silver and beasts help the man; the freewill offering is for the house.
Verse 5 describes those whose spirit God stirred to go up. Verse 4 speaks to everyone else. The two verses fit together as one arrangement:
Michael HardtThose whose spirits were raised up were to go up (v. 5). Others who would not go up themselves are told to support them with material help (v. 4). It is beautiful to read that they did so (v. 6).
And they did give. Far more stayed than went, yet the record keeps their generosity, not their reluctance.
The offer was open to all, yet the response was thin. One writer contrasts the motives of the two groups without excusing either:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinBut not all were ready to go back; only a small remnant was willing. The great majority preferred to remain in Babylon. There was nothing to attract them to Jerusalem — the city of ruins, with the once magnificent temple in ruins. Those who returned loved Jerusalem, the place the LORD had chosen. Only there could they bring the appointed offerings and sacrifices… And the Jews who remained helped them generously in every way.
The same work of God appears in three very different people: a foreign emperor, the families who travelled, and the neighbours who paid. Nobody organised it:
Edward DennettIn this chapter we have all the signs of a genuine work of God. A shared heart and purpose is produced in all concerned. It appears in Cyrus, without whose permission the captives could not have returned. It appears in the leading fathers of Judah and Benjamin, who were needed for the actual work of building. It appears in those who remained, who had fellowship with their brothers through their freewill offerings and so contributed towards the necessary expenses. There were no preliminary meetings to arrange things and reach agreement. The union of heart and purpose was produced only by the action of the Lord on the hearts of all alike. This distinguishes a divine work from a human one, and is the sure proof of a real working of the Spirit of God. Every needed instrument comes forward at the right moment, for the work is of God, and it must be accomplished.
Both the journey and the gift served one object:
Hamilton SmithTo build the house of God, a remnant had been set free from the corruptions of Babylon and brought back to God's land… Those who remained in captivity were urged to help with a "freewill offering for the house of God that is in Jerusalem."
- Stirred — the same God who moved Cyrus to write the decree moved the families to travel and the neighbours to give. No meeting arranged it. That agreement marks a work as God's, not man's.
- Freed — release from Babylon came with silver, gold, goods and beasts. The captives were not only set free but enriched. A foreign king's words showed a God of grace.
- Sent — only a small remnant went; the majority stayed. A city of ruins attracts nobody but those who love the place God has chosen.
- Shared — the one who stayed still had a part: he supplied the traveller and added a freewill offering. Fellowship in the work reached further than the road to Jerusalem.
- Built — help for the man and a gift for the house are two different things here. Both served one object: the house of God in Jerusalem.
And the chief fathers of Judah and Benjamin rose up, and the priests, and the Levites, even all those whose spirit God had stirred, to go up to build the house of Jehovah which is at Jerusalem.
Cyrus opened the door with a decree, but an open door moves nobody through it. Verse 5 records a second work, done inside the hearts of the leaders, priests and Levites, and it answers one question: what makes a small group leave a settled exile to rebuild a ruin?
The same phrase covers the Persian king in verse 1 and the returning families here. A decree, even a sincere one, could not produce a return by itself.
H. L. RossierThese were intellectual convictions, which might have nothing to do with a work of conscience or a living faith. Cyrus was even sure he was an instrument chosen to carry out God's purposes (v. 2). But all this was not enough to bring about the restoration of the captives. God intended to show that it was He Himself and no other who fulfilled His Word. That is why it says: "The LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia" (v. 1). He also stirred up the spirit of the heads of the fathers' houses of Judah and Benjamin. And He stirred up the spirit of the priests and the Levites (v. 5).
One writer draws the general rule out of these two stirrings.
Michael HardtIt is remarkable how God works. First He "stirs up the spirit" of this pagan king, so that he passes a decree inviting the Jews to return to Jerusalem. He then stirs up the spirit of those who did so (1:5). Whatever men do, a true revival is always a work of God.
The verse names Judah and Benjamin, plus the priests and the Levites. That list is exact.
Edward DennettFirst, note that the heads of the fathers' houses who offered themselves for the work came from two tribes: Judah and Benjamin. There were also Levites, but they did not count as a tribe, for Levi had "no portion or inheritance with his brothers. The LORD is his inheritance" (see Deuteronomy 10:8-9). This and other Scriptures make it plain that only these two tribes were restored. Some people from other tribes may have come as well.
The stirring had one object, and the decree of Cyrus had the same one.
The Christian's FriendThe object of the people's return concerned the building of the house of the Lord. This was the subject of the proclamation of Cyrus, whom God raised up for this very purpose... And for this end God worked in the hearts of those who were made willing to return to the land of their fathers.
God was not only at work inside these people.
F. B. HoleVerse 5 of the first chapter shows a real work of God in the souls of many, including leaders both civil and religious. It led them to seize at once the opportunity given for a return to the land of their fathers, and to re-establish the worship of God by rebuilding His house. In God's providence Cyrus himself promoted this. A providential work of God in the surrounding world matched the spiritual work of God in the souls of His people.
The stirring reached only a minority.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinBut not all were ready to go back; only a small remnant was willing. The great majority preferred to remain in Babylon. There was nothing to attract them to Jerusalem — the city of ruins, with the once magnificent temple in ruins. Those who returned loved Jerusalem, the place the LORD had chosen.
The agreement reached further than the travellers.
Edward DennettAgreement of heart and object is produced in all concerned: in Cyrus, without whose permission the captives could not have returned; in the heads of the fathers' houses of Judah and Benjamin, who were needed for the actual work of building; and in those who stayed behind, who shared with their brothers through their freewill offerings and helped cover the necessary costs. Nobody held preliminary meetings to arrange matters and reach an agreement. The action of the Lord on the hearts of all alike, and nothing else, produced this union of heart and purpose. This distinguishes a divine work from a human one, and is the sure proof of a real action of the Spirit of God. Every needed instrument therefore comes forward at the right moment, for the work is of God, and it must be accomplished.
- Stirred, twice. God moved a pagan king to open the door. Then He moved His own people to walk through it, since the decree alone could not restore anyone.
- Stirred for a purpose. God stirred hearts with one object: to go up and build the house of the LORD in Jerusalem.
- Stirred inside and outside. God did a real work in the souls of civil and religious leaders, and arranged the world outside them to match.
- Stirred, but few. Only a small remnant responded. The majority preferred Babylon, since a ruined city held nothing to attract them.
- Stirred, therefore united. Agreement between king, travellers and givers came with no prior arrangement. That is the mark of a work that is God's, and such work must be finished.
And all they that were about them strengthened their hands with articles of silver, with gold, with goods, and with beasts, and with precious things, besides all that was willingly offered.
Cyrus had just issued his decree, and the families God stirred were packing to leave Babylon for Jerusalem. Their neighbours paid for the journey — which raises two questions: who moved these givers, and what does it mean to fund a work you are not joining?
The decree spoke to two groups: those who would go, and those who would stay and help pay.
Michael HardtThose whose spirits were raised up were to go up (v. 5). Verse 4 tells others, who would not go up themselves, to support them with material help. It is beautiful to read that they did so (v. 6).
The decree asked for these gifts, but the decree is not what produced them.
Edward DennettNext, God worked in the hearts of the neighbours of those who devoted themselves to the work of the Lord's house. They "offered willingly," as the proclamation had asked, out of their own property. They helped them with vessels of silver and gold, and so on.
Notice what is missing from the chapter. Nobody called a meeting to arrange any of this.
Edward DennettWe have here, in this chapter, all the signs of a genuine work of God. Everyone concerned comes to the same heart and purpose. Cyrus agrees, and without his permission the captives could not have returned. The heads of the families of Judah and Benjamin agree, and the actual building work needed them. Those who stayed behind agree, and they shared with their brothers by their freewill offerings and so contributed towards the necessary expenses. There were no meetings beforehand to arrange things and reach agreement. The Lord alone produced this union of heart and purpose, working on the hearts of all alike. This is what marks off a divine work from a human one, and it is the sure proof of a real working of the Spirit of God. Every needed instrument comes forward at the right moment, because the work is of God and it must be accomplished.
God's people did not leave Babylon empty-handed. Their neighbours could have despised them for going. Instead they filled their hands.
Leslie M. GrantThis was not only a matter of freeing slaves, but of enriching them. So Cyrus was rightly representing a God of grace.… People near those who intended to go were willing to help them as Cyrus had directed. They gave silver and gold, goods and livestock, and precious things — that is, things of special value (v. 6). This shows at least that those so concerned about going to Jerusalem had not earned the contempt of the people among whom they lived.
The open wording of the decree did more than invite volunteers. It sorted them.
F. B. HoleThe proclamation did not name any person or persons who were to go to Jerusalem and build the house. It threw the door open to any Jew whose heart stirred him to go, and promised him generous help in the project ahead of him. Worded like this, it meant that those who responded would mainly be men of piety, whose hearts were alive to the glory of God and to the place of His Name. The more worldly and selfish would be inclined to stay in the comfortable homes they had built during the seventy years of captivity. They would leave the task to others who were ready to face the difficulties and hardships.
Older translations say "strengthened their hands… with precious things." The ESV has "aided them… with costly wares." One writer turns those older words into a question for us.
F. A. HughesIn the wonderful day of recovery pictured in Ezra we see men of Judah and men of Benjamin concerned about building God's house. Their names remind us of the praises of God and of the Son of His right hand. Priests, Levites, and all whose spirits God had raised strengthened their hands with, among other blessed features, "precious things." Beloved, have our hearts not been "raised" (or "stirred," J.N.D.) by the truth that has been recovered to us in our day?… What strengthening of hands should be ours! Outwardly it is a day of smallness and weakness. Inwardly we are strong in affection and loyalty to Christ as we know and enjoy these "precious things" in the power of the Spirit.
- Stirred. God moved Cyrus. He moved the families who went. He moved the neighbours who paid. The offering was His work before it was theirs.
- Shared. Those who stayed home still had a share in the work. Their gifts were their real part in it.
- Sign. King, builders and givers agreed, and nobody called a meeting. That unplanned unity marks a work of God rather than a work of men.
- Standing. The neighbours did not despise this small group for going. They sent them off rich.
- Sifted. The open decree let each heart show itself. Some faced the hardship. Others kept their comfortable homes and left the task to someone else.
And king Cyrus brought forth the vessels of the house of Jehovah, which Nebuchadnezzar had brought forth out of Jerusalem and had put in the house of his god.
Nebuchadnezzar carried the temple's gold and silver into a pagan treasury. Seventy years later, a Persian king opens that treasury and hands the sacred vessels back. Why did God count these objects so important? And what does their return say about how He restores what His people have lost?
Cyrus was not the only heart God moved. One writer reads the king's act as proof that God had touched him too:
Edward DennettFinally, Cyrus himself showed his interest in the work. He restored the vessels of the temple that Nebuchadnezzar had carried out of Jerusalem and put in the house of his gods. This was evidence that his own heart had also been touched by divine power. He counted these vessels out to Sheshbazzar, the prince of Judah.
God worked in two places at once:
F. B. HoleGod worked spiritually in the souls of His people, and He matched it with a providential work in the world around them. And so it has been again in more recent times.
The scale of the damage was not what set God's clock running:
Michael HardtThere had been three deportations... The last of these three did the most damage. The temple was burnt, and very large numbers were led away captive. But the 70 years of captivity count from the first deportation, which we would call relatively unimportant. Why was this first one the important one in God's eyes? Well, it's because of the vessels. Nebuchadnezzar had taken the vessels of the Temple to Babylon, and even put them into the house of his idols. Such a thing had never happened before. True, some kings had taken silver from the treasure and even from the wings of the doors of the temple to appease the king of Assyria. But the holy vessels had never been touched.
The loss was not sentimental. It shut down the whole system of approach to God:
Michael HardtWithout vessels, it was impossible to bring sacrifices as prescribed. No vessels, no worship! This is the tragedy. Does it not remind us of the sad fact that the idea of worship, and especially worship together, has been lost across much of the Christian world?
Because they stood for worship itself, the gap between their removal and their return carries weight:
Georges AndréThese vessels represented the worship rendered to God. The period of seventy years between their removal and return, as announced by the prophet, emphasizes their symbolic importance.
Nebuchadnezzar put the vessels of the true God inside an idol's temple. One writer asks what that really changed, and then points to where it ended:
H. L. RossierGod had been dishonoured by the idolatry of the people and their kings. Was there any great difference whether the precious vessels stayed in His temple or were placed in the temple of idols at Babylon?... When wicked Belshazzar drank wine from the sacred vessels in praise of his idols, he meant to celebrate the triumph of false gods over the true God, and to set them publicly against the Lord. That same night, God answered him with judgment and death.
The vessels outlasted the empire that stole them:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinNo doubt Cyrus had these vessels collected and carefully guarded... How it all shows that God had not forgotten His people! When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf.
One thing never came back, and its absence shapes the whole return:
The Bible TreasuryThe holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for the Lord's house in Jerusalem. The ark — the centre, the highest in value, the nearest to the glory — was not there. Sadly, the glory itself had withdrawn. But in the day when the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, never to leave again.
These were not new vessels. The old ones came back, and one writer draws the lesson for God's people now:
Michael HardtWhat the people of God need today is not so much innovation, but a return to the basic principles that were there from the beginning — a return to the Scriptures... A genuine revival always shows itself in the discovery of the Scriptures. It is not that the Scriptures could not have been known before. Through negligence they had been forgotten.
Later in the book, Ezra hands the same kind of treasure to chosen men with a charge about who may touch it:
Edward DennettThe ground of the choice was, that they were "holy to the Lord," as also were the vessels. As the prophet said, "You must be clean that bear the vessels of the Lord."
- Taken — God dated the captivity from the first and smallest deportation. The reason was the vessels. No earlier king had put them in an idol's house.
- Silenced — Without the vessels, no one could bring the prescribed sacrifices. No vessels, no worship — and seventy years of silence.
- Kept — Babylon profaned them, and God answered that same night with judgment. The vessels outlived the empire. God had not forgotten His people.
- Returned — Cyrus counted the old vessels out to Judah's prince. Recovery means going back to what was there from the beginning, not inventing something new.
- Incomplete — The ark was missing and the glory had withdrawn. A day is coming when the glory returns and never leaves.
And Cyrus king of Persia brought them forth by the hand of Mithredath the treasurer, who counted them out to Sheshbazzar the prince of Judah.
Cyrus does not just free the captives — he also hands back the gold and silver articles Nebuchadnezzar had looted from the temple. Who is this Sheshbazzar, and why does Scripture give so much space to a list of bowls and dishes?
Two names, one man. Commentators explain the name in this verse as a Babylonian name given during the exile.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThis prince was Zerubbabel. Sheshbazzar was the name the Babylonians had given him. He was born in Babylon, and his name means "stranger in Babylon." He became the princely leader of the returning exiles... In all there were 5,400 vessels of gold and silver which were handed over to Zerubbabel to take back to Jerusalem. It all shows that God had not forgotten His people. When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf.
He was more than one exile among many.
Morrish Bible DictionaryHe was a "prince of Judah," and he seems to have held some office in Persia, since he is called Sheshbazzar... He led the Jews who volunteered to return from exile under the decree of Cyrus.
The list of vessels looks like a minor detail. It actually sets the clock on the whole captivity.
Michael HardtThere had been three deportations... The last of these three was the most significant one in terms of the damage done. The temple was burnt, and very large numbers led captive. But the 70 years of captivity run from the first deportation — the one we would call minor. Why was this first one the important one in God's eyes? Well, it's because of the vessels.
Take away the vessels and something more than property is lost.
Michael HardtWithout vessels, it was impossible to bring sacrifices as prescribed. No vessels, no worship! This is the tragedy. Doesn't this remind us of a sad fact? Much of the Christian world has lost the whole idea of worship, and above all of worship together. Concerts, performances, and all sorts of other things have taken the place of meetings for worship.
Cyrus had to fetch these things out of a pagan temple before he could hand them back. Someone kept the record down to the last item.
Leslie M. GrantKing Cyrus had all the articles Nebuchadnezzar had taken from Jerusalem brought out of the temple of his idols. He sent them back to their rightful place. He knew that Babylon's idols were not God. The Persian treasurer, Mithredath, counted these out to Sheshbazzar the prince of Judah. The record of them was faithfully kept.
One thing is missing from the list, and it is the most valuable of all.
The Bible TreasuryThe holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. The ark was not there — the centre, the most valuable, the nearest to the glory. Sadly, the glory itself had gone. But on the day when the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, never to leave again.
A foreign king, the builders, and those who stayed behind all move in step. No one organised it.
Edward DennettThe Lord produced the same heart and the same aim in everyone involved. Cyrus was one of them, and without his permission the captives could not have returned. Another group was the leading fathers of Judah and Benjamin, who were needed for the actual building work. A third was those who stayed behind... There were no meetings beforehand to arrange things and reach agreement. The union of heart and purpose came from the Lord's action on the hearts of all alike... So every instrument that is needed comes forward at the right moment, for the work is of God, and it must be done.
This pattern was not limited to Ezra's day.
F. B. HoleAlongside the spiritual work of God in the souls of His people ran a providential work of God in the world around them. So it has been again in more recent times.
- Taken. The vessels went to Babylon first. God dated the seventy years from that loss, not from the burning of the temple.
- Emptied. No vessels meant no sacrifices, so the real loss was worship itself. The same loss happens wherever performance takes the place of worship.
- Kept. They sat in an idol's temple, yet they were still there when Cyrus went looking. God had not forgotten His people.
- Counted. Mithredath counted them out item by item to the prince of Judah, and the record was kept. What God restores, He restores in order and into named hands.
- Incomplete. The ark is missing from the list, and the glory had gone. The return under Zerubbabel is real but partial; the glory comes back in full only when salvation comes out of Zion.
And this is the number of them thirty chargers of gold, a thousand chargers of silver, nine-and-twenty knives,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
thirty basons of gold, silver basons of a second [sort] four hundred and ten, [and] other vessels a thousand.
As the exiles prepare to leave Babylon, officials count out the temple articles Nebuchadnezzar had carried off, piece by piece. Why does Scripture record the exact number of gold and silver bowls — and what did those objects mean to God?
The Hebrew word behind "bowls" (older translations say "basons") names a specific piece of temple equipment:
Morrish Bible Dictionarykephor, 'large cup or bowl,' probably for the wine drunk before the Lord; where Scripture speaks of blood, it uses a different word. 1 Chr. 28:17; Ezra 1:10; Ezra 8:27.
One writer traces God's seventy-year clock back to these vessels:
Michael HardtThere had been three deportations. The last of the three did the most damage: the temple was burnt, and very large numbers of people were led captive. But the 70 years of captivity count from the first deportation — the one we would call relatively unimportant. Why was this first one the important one in God's eyes? Well, it's because of the vessels. Nebuchadnezzar had taken the vessels of the Temple, took them to Babylon, and even put them into the house of his idols. Such a thing had never happened before. True, some kings had taken silver from the treasure and even from the wings of the doors of the temple (Ahas and Hezekiah) to appease the king of Assyria. But the holy vessels had never been touched.
The loss was not only material. One writer draws out what it cost Israel, and what a similar loss costs today:
Michael HardtWithout vessels, it was impossible to bring sacrifices as prescribed. No vessels, no worship! This is the tragedy. Does it not remind us of a sad fact? Wide parts of Christendom have lost the very idea of worship, and especially of worship together. Concerts, performances, and all kinds of things have replaced meetings for worship. Do you know a place where you can meet with Christians in full liberty of collective worship to the Father and the Son? This is the one thing the Father 'seeks': worshippers.
One writer sees two works of God running side by side — one inside the hearts of the exiles, one out in the wider world:
F. B. HoleVerse 5 of the first chapter shows that there was a real work of God in the souls of many, including leaders both civil and religious. This work led them to seize at once the opportunity given them: to return to the land of their fathers and re-establish the worship of God by rebuilding His house. In the providence of God, Cyrus actively promoted this. Besides the valuable vessels given by Jews who did not join the journey to Jerusalem, he restored all the holy vessels of the house of the Lord, which Nebuchadnezzar had placed in the house of his gods. God's work in the souls of His people was matched by His providential work in the world around them.
One writer follows the vessels from the idol's temple into the hands of Zerubbabel:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThen Cyrus restored the vessels of the house of the LORD, which Nebuchadnezzar had brought from Jerusalem and put into the house of his gods (Daniel 1:2). His grandson, Belshazzar, defiled them at his shameless feast (Dan. 5:2). That same night Belshazzar was killed and Babylon fell. No doubt Cyrus had these vessels collected and carefully guarded... In all there were 5,400 vessels of gold and silver, handed over to Zerubbabel to take back to Jerusalem. It all shows that God had not forgotten His people. When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf.
Yet one article never appears in the list, and it was the greatest of all:
The Bible TreasuryThe holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. The ark, the centre, the highest in value, the nearest to the glory, was not there. Sadly, the glory itself had gone away. But in the day that the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, never to leave again.
- Vessels named. The "bowls" are large cups, probably used for the wine drunk before the Lord. They were working equipment for God's house, not decoration.
- Vessels taken. Nebuchadnezzar put the holy vessels in an idol's temple, something no king had done before. God dated the seventy years from that deportation.
- Vessels missed. Without them the appointed sacrifices could not be offered at all: no vessels, no worship.
- Vessels returned. Cyrus collected, guarded and released 5,400 gold and silver articles. God had not forgotten His people. His work in their hearts was matched by His work in world affairs.
- Vessels incomplete. The ark, the most valuable and the closest to the glory, was missing from the list. The glory itself returns in the day Israel's salvation comes out of Zion.
All the vessels of gold and of silver were five thousand four hundred. The whole did Sheshbazzar bring up, when they of the captivity were brought up from Babylon to Jerusalem.
Ezra's first chapter ends with an inventory rather than a speech. It raises three questions: who was Sheshbazzar, why does God count temple dishes so carefully, and what does it mean that freed captives go home carrying the vessels of their worship?
One writer explains where the name Sheshbazzar came from, and who this man was.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinMithredath the treasurer handed them to Sheshbazzar the prince of Judah. This prince was Zerubbabel: Sheshbazzar was the name the Babylonians had given him. He was born in Babylon; his name means "stranger in Babylon." He became the prince who led the returning exiles… In all, Zerubbabel received 5,400 vessels of gold and silver to take back to Jerusalem. It all shows that God had not forgotten His people. When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf.
The same writer looks ahead to a further return, with a greater leader:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinHe has not forgotten His promise either. He will bring a remnant back from the great scattering among all the nations of the world. When that return comes, a greater than Zerubbabel the prince of Judah will be the leader. The Lord Jesus, the Son of David, will be their Deliverer.
One writer shows that these vessels gave the first captivity its whole character.
H. L. RossierThis first captivity had a character of its own. Devastation and the great number of men carried away marked the second and the third captivities. What marked the first was the plundering of the house of the Lord, stripped of the precious objects used in the service of worship… When Judah was restored, all these objects came back — 5,400 of them. This was even the most characteristic feature of the exodus that brought the remnant of the people back to their land… The main feature at the start of these 70 years is that the glory of the temple, the glory of the service of the worship of the Lord, was itself carried away captive.
The same writer explains why taking these vessels was worse than any earlier stripping of the temple.
H. L. RossierUnder Jehoiachin, Nebuchadnezzar plundered all the treasures of the house of God on a far greater scale, and smashed the vessels which Solomon had made… But, I repeat, this was a profanation with no precedent: decorating a temple of idols with the vessels made for the worship of the true God… Wicked Belshazzar drank wine from the sacred vessels with his lords, his wives and his concubines, in praise of his idols. He meant to celebrate the triumph of false gods over the true God, and to set them against the Lord in public. That same night, God answered him with judgment and death.
The list is exact, but one thing is missing from it.
The Bible TreasuryThe holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. But the ark was not there — the centre of it all, the highest in value, the nearest to the glory. Sadly, the glory itself had withdrawn. But in the day that the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, no more to leave.
Two works of God stand behind this return.
F. B. HoleVerse 5 of the first chapter shows a real work of God in the souls of many… It led them to seize at once the opportunity they were given to return to the land of their fathers, and to set up the worship of God again by rebuilding His house. In the providence of God, Cyrus promoted this… he restored all the holy vessels of the house of the Lord, which Nebuchadnezzar had placed in the house of his gods. God's spiritual work in the souls of His people was matched by His providential work in the world around them.
One writer turns this care for dishes into comfort for God's people.
Hamilton SmithHe keeps the basins and knives of His house. He brings the vessels back again to the second temple. So His care for His redeemed ones must be more tender than His care for a spoon.
- Spoiled. Above all, the first captivity stripped God's house of the objects used in worship.
- Profaned. Those same vessels stood in an idol temple. Belshazzar drank from them to crown his false gods over the true God. God answered that same night with judgment.
- Counted. A Persian treasurer counted out every item into the hands of Sheshbazzar, the prince of Judah. He was born in exile, and his name means "stranger in Babylon."
- Carried. The vessels went up with the people. The return of worship was the mark of this exodus, and proof that God had not forgotten His own.
- Incomplete. The ark was not in the list, and the glory had withdrawn. The restoration was real but partial. It points on to a greater Leader and a glory that will not leave again.