Ezra 1–3

Ezra 1:1 · Darby

And in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of Jehovah by the mouth of Jeremiah might be accomplished, Jehovah stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, and he made a proclamation throughout his kingdom, and also in writing, saying,

The book of Ezra opens with a date, a prophecy, and a foreign king. They seem unrelated until you see who holds them together. The exiles in Babylon had lost everything. Yet this verse says the deciding factor was not politics, but a word God had spoken seventy years earlier.

The Clock Set by God's Word

Commentators point out that the seventy years were not a rough guess. God fixed the term before the exile began.

Seventy years before their return, the prophet Jeremiah, who lived in the closing days of the kingdom of Judah, had foretold that judgment would overtake the nation. Because of their wickedness they would be carried off into captivity at Babylon, and their land would be left in ruins. Even so, the prophecy said that after seventy years the LORD would bring them back to their land. The book of Ezra opens in the first year of Cyrus, king of Persia — seventy years after the Captivity. At that time, so that the word of the LORD by Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus, who issued a proclamation to the people of God setting them free to return to the Land to "build the house of the LORD God of Israel."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Cyrus Named Before He Was Born

The king in this verse was no surprise to God. God named him long before Babylon took Jerusalem.

This prophecy came long before Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem, and at least a hundred years before God called Jeremiah to his work as a prophet. So it shows that the eye and heart of God are always on His people and on their interests. It shows too that the public events of the world — the rise and fall of empires, the coming of mighty conquerors — are only the instruments of His power. Through them He works on through the governments of the world to fulfil His own purposes for His people on earth. How calmly, then, the children of God may rest amid political confusion and strife! In this way God had marked out, by the mouth of Isaiah, two hundred years before the event told in our chapter, the man He had chosen to restore His people and to build His house at Jerusalem.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

"The LORD Stirred Up the Spirit"

Writers note that knowing the facts about God's plan is not the same as being moved by God.

But none of this was enough to bring the captives back: not these convictions of the mind (which might have nothing to do with a work of conscience or a living faith), and not even his certainty that God had chosen him as an instrument to carry out His plans (v. 2). God meant to show that it was He Himself and no other who fulfilled His Word. That is why it says: "the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia" (v. 1).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The same phrase returns four verses later, this time about the people themselves.

It is remarkable how God works. First He "stirs up the spirit" of this pagan king, so that he passes a decree inviting the Jews to return to Jerusalem. He then stirs up the spirit of those who went (Ezra 1:5). Whatever men do, a true revival is always a work of God.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

A God Who Works Out of Sight

Something has changed in how God deals with His people. He now acts through the empire that rules them.

In these books God is no longer seen stepping openly into the affairs of His people. He works, as it were, behind the scenes. At the same time He recognises the new order that He Himself has set up, and He uses the Gentile kings, into whose hands He had put the rule of the earth, to carry out His purposes.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Prophecy, Prayer, and Providence

While God stirred Cyrus, an old man in Babylon was praying. One writer names the three men God used, and how each one served.

So to fulfil this promise God used Jeremiah in prophecy, Daniel in prayer, and Cyrus — a man who did not know the Lord — in providence.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What guided Daniel matters, because nothing around him looked hopeful.

He discovers "by books," not by circumstances, that God would visit His people in captivity and open a way for them to return to their land. He has just seen the king of Babylon destroyed and his empire fall. But he does not guess at the meaning of the stirring events around him, or try to draw from them conclusions that favour God's people.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A Pattern for Days of Ruin

Those who came back were only a small remnant. Their story is left as an example.

The Holy Spirit presents those who returned as showing the marks that a believing remnant should take on in a time of ruin. They are a very healthy example for us — an example that teaches us how we may be witnesses of God in difficult circumstances.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Word first. Seventy years earlier God spoke through Jeremiah. Ezra 1:1 names that word as the reason anything happens at all.

- Word names. The same word had named Cyrus before his birth, so the rise of an empire was only an instrument in God's hand.

- Word stirs. Cyrus was convinced in his mind, but that was not enough. God stirred his spirit, and then the people's too.

- Word hides. From Ezra on, God is no longer seen acting in the open. He works behind the scenes through the Gentile kings.

- Word answers. Jeremiah prophesied. Daniel prayed, guided by the books and not by the news around him. Cyrus acted without knowing God — one word carried by three men.

Ezra 1:2 · Darby

Thus says Cyrus king of Persia All the kingdoms of the earth has Jehovah the God of the heavens given to me, and he has charged me to build him a house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah.

A Persian emperor, fresh from taking Babylon, issues a decree in the name of Israel's God — the God whose prophet had named him two centuries earlier. The verse raises two questions at once: what did Cyrus actually understand, and why does he call the LORD "the God of heaven" rather than the God of Israel?

Isaiah's Word, Cyrus's Decree

One writer sets the prediction and its fulfilment side by side.

Open the book of Ezra, and we go back to the first year of that great king. The prophet Isaiah had mentioned him by name some two centuries before he came to the throne. If we turn to Isaiah 44:28, we read the prediction of what he would do. Ezra 1:2 records his doing what Isaiah foretold.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

So the "charge" in the decree points back to a prophecy already in writing.

How powerfully Isaiah's prophecy must have struck a mind so thoughtful! No sceptics were on hand to whisper their doubts. Daniel was there too, to point him to Jeremiah. It was not policy but Jehovah that stirred up the spirit of Cyrus, as He did that of the chief fathers of the Jews. The conqueror of Babylon proclaimed a kind of jubilee to the captives — but with one stated aim: to build Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. Who but an enemy of God's word can doubt that Isaiah 44:28 was his "charge" from Jehovah?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why "The God of Heaven"

Cyrus uses the title that runs right through this part of Scripture. It marks a change in how God dealt with His people.

God is given the distinct title "the God of the heavens" (Dan. 2:18, 37, 44). It comes again in Ezra 1:2, Ezra 5:12, Ezra 6:9-10, Ezra 7:12, 23, Neh. 1:4-5, Neh. 2:4, and also in 2 Chronicles 36:23. His people had fallen away to idols. In that state it did not suit His nature and majesty to act at their head or among them as "the Lord of all the earth." (Joshua 3:11)

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Cyrus was not alone among the Persian kings in using it.

Cyrus, like the kings of Persia who followed him, hated idols. Acknowledging the God of Israel as "the God of the heavens", he insists here that "he is God" (v. 3). In the same way Artaxerxes, king of Persia, later openly declares that the Lord God of Israel is "the God of the heavens" (Ezra 7:21, 23).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Confession, Not a Conversion

Cyrus credits the LORD with giving him his empire. Does that make him a believer?

In Cyrus we do not see the power of faith, but, just as Nebuchadnezzar carried out God's work, so Cyrus is the servant of His mercy to bring the Jew back to the land. In himself he goes further than Nebuchadnezzar. He says (Ezra 1:2, etc.) that the Jehovah-God had given him the kingdoms of the earth, and a charge to build the house at Jerusalem. Whether this confession of God's sovereignty came from a saving faith is another matter. God is able to make the world confess His power and authority... The point is not what Cyrus was in himself, but his work.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Knowing the Mission Was Not Enough

A king convinced of his mission could not bring the captives home by himself.

But all this was not enough to bring the captives back. These were convictions of the mind, and they might have nothing to do with a work of conscience or a living faith. Even the assurance of being an instrument chosen to carry out God's designs (v. 2) fell short. God meant to show that it was He Himself and no other who fulfilled His Word. That is why it says: "The LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia" (v. 1). He also stirred up the spirit of the chief fathers of Judah and Benjamin and the spirit of the priests and of Levites (v. 5).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Charge Defines the Return

The decree does three separate things, and the commission in verse 2 is the first of them.

Three things are announced here. First, the commission Cyrus himself had received about the Lord's house. Second, his royal permission for any of the Jews to return to Jerusalem to build the temple. Third, his invitation to those Jews who would stay in his lands to join those who left, by freewill offerings toward the object they had in view.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

That single purpose shaped everything that followed, including what still had to be done afterwards.

In the first instance, God delivered a remnant of His people from captivity and brought them back to the Land, under Zerubbabel, in order to build the house of the Lord (Ezra 1:2-3). But once the house was built, it became necessary to build the walls and set up the gates to guard the sanctity of the house of the Lord.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Word. Isaiah named Cyrus some two centuries early. Verse 2 records him doing what was foretold, and his "charge" traces back to Isaiah 44:28.

- Title. "God of heaven" is the name used all through Ezra, Nehemiah and Daniel. His people had fallen away to idols, so it no longer suited Him to act among them as Lord of all the earth.

- Confession. Cyrus owns that the LORD gave him his kingdoms. Yet the writers leave open whether this was saving faith: what counts here is his work, not the man.

- Stirring. Conviction was not enough. The LORD stirred Cyrus's spirit, and then the spirits of the chief fathers, the priests and the Levites.

- House. The commission, the permission to return, and the freewill offerings all serve one aim: the house of the Lord at Jerusalem.

Ezra 1:3 · Darby

Whosoever there is among you of all his people, his God be with him, and let him go up to Jerusalem, which is in Judah, and build the house of Jehovah the God of Israel -- he is God -- which is at Jerusalem.

The seventy years of exile are over. A Persian king's decree opens the road home. But it names no one and commands no one. It leaves the door open to whoever will walk through it.

A Gentile King's Proclamation

Cyrus was not a worshipper of Israel's God, yet his edict speaks with unusual confidence about what God had charged him to do. Commentators note how much this pagan ruler was willing to say out loud.

It was no small thing for Cyrus to acknowledge the supreme glory and power of God in this striking way. It was no small thing that he obeyed what God had commanded. It is not surprising that God should have spoken of him as "His anointed."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The proclamation as a whole holds three separate things together, and it is worth keeping them distinct.

Three things are announced here: the commission which Cyrus himself had received about the Lord's house; his royal permission for any of the Jews to return to Jerusalem in order to build the temple; and lastly, his invitation to those Jews who would stay in his territories to have fellowship with those who left, by giving freewill offerings toward the goal they had in view.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

No Names, Only a Question

The decree singles out nobody. That silence did its own sorting work.

The proclamation did not name any person or persons who were to go to Jerusalem and build the house. Instead it threw the door open for any Jew whose heart stirred him up to go. Such a man had the assurance that he would receive generous help in the project ahead of him. Worded this way, it meant that those who responded would mostly be men of piety, whose hearts were alive to the glory of God and to the place of His Name. The more worldly-minded and selfish would prefer to stay in their comfortable homes, built up during the seventy years of captivity. They would leave the task to others who were ready to face the difficulties and hardships.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

An Invitation That Tested Everyone

It was an invitation, not an order. So it showed what people really loved.

This proclamation became a test of the moral condition of the people of God. On one side, it raised a question. Were their affections so set on their land, their God, and the house of God that in simple faith they were ready to face trials and difficulties, opposition and reproach? Were they ready to answer to the mind of God and carry out His will? Or on the other side, did they prefer to stay in Babylon with its ease and material comforts?

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

"He Is the God"

The verse pauses to say whose house this is. That short phrase carries weight, and so does the practical help attached to it.

Notice, he does not give any honour to the idols of Persia, but says of the God of Israel, "he is the God" (v. 3). He also gave instructions to the neighbours of anyone concerned about taking this journey to Jerusalem. They were to "help him with silver and gold, with goods and with beasts, besides freewill offerings for the house of God that is in Jerusalem" (v. 4). This was not only a matter of setting slaves free, but of enriching them. So Cyrus was rightly representing a God of grace.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The House Before the City

The goal here is a building project, and a narrow one. The ruined city walls are not yet on the agenda.

What Cyrus had in view was the building of "the house of the LORD," and he was not concerned with the desolate state of the city. Later, Nehemiah became deeply concerned about the ruined and desolate condition of Jerusalem. He obtained permission from Artaxerxes to restore and build the city. It was a case of God's house first, the city where men dwell second. This is a principle of lasting significance.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Who Actually Went Up

The ones who answered were a minority, and their reasons were not practical ones.

Not everyone was ready to go back; only a small remnant was willing. The great majority preferred to stay in Babylon. There was nothing to attract them to Jerusalem — a city of ruins, with the once magnificent temple in ruins. Those who returned loved Jerusalem, the place the LORD had chosen. There, and nowhere else, the people could bring the appointed offerings and sacrifices. They belonged to those who sat by the rivers of Babylon and wept when they remembered Zion. They said, "If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its skill! Let my tongue stick to the roof of my mouth, if I do not remember you, if I do not set Jerusalem above my highest joy!" (Ps. 137:5-6).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Call Still Sounding

Writers read the open-ended question of this verse as one that has never been withdrawn.

In a sense, King Cyrus is still alive. The same call still goes out. Who is there among you? Who is there who is not content with Babylon? Who is there who values Jerusalem? Who is there who takes an interest in the house of God?

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Charged — Cyrus did not worship the God of Israel, yet he acknowledged His glory and power and obeyed what God had commanded. God called him "His anointed."

- Opened — The decree names no one and drafts no one. It opens the door to "whoever is among you of all his people."

- Tested — An invitation, not an order, exposes the heart: comfort in Babylon, or the trouble and reproach of going up.

- Built — The stated object is the house of the LORD, not the city walls. God's house comes first; the city where people live comes second.

- Answered — Only a small remnant went up. They loved Jerusalem more than comfort, and the same call still asks who will go.

Ezra 1:4 · Darby

And whosoever remains in any place where he sojourns, let the men of his place help him with silver, and with gold, and with goods, and with beasts, besides the voluntary offering for the house of God which is at Jerusalem.

Cyrus's decree does not stop with permission to leave; its final clause turns to the people who will stay behind and tells them to fund the ones who go. It names two kinds of gift: supplies for the traveller, and a voluntary gift for the house of God. So who really has a share in this work?

The Third Part of the Decree

The verse ends a proclamation that moves outward in three stages: the king, the willing, and those who stay. One writer sets out the structure:

Three things are announced here. First, the commission Cyrus himself had received about the Lord's house. Second, his royal permission for any of the Jews to return to Jerusalem to build the temple. Last, his invitation to the Jews who would remain in his lands: they could have fellowship with those who left, by freewill offerings towards the object they had in view.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

So the Jew who stays behind — "in whatever place he sojourns" — is not excused. He is invited into the same purpose as the man who travels.

Freedom That Comes With Riches

Cyrus lets the captives go, but not empty-handed. He tells their neighbours to send them off with silver, gold, goods and beasts. One writer sees the God behind the king's words:

Notice, he does not give any honour to the idols of Persia, but says of the God of Israel, "He is God" (v. 3). He also told the neighbours of anyone concerned about this journey to Jerusalem to assist him "with silver and gold, with goods and with beasts, besides freewill offerings for the house of God that is in Jerusalem" (v. 4). This was not only a matter of liberating slaves, but enriching them. So Cyrus rightly represented a God of grace.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Note the distinction the verse itself draws. The silver and beasts help the man; the freewill offering is for the house.

A Share for Those Who Stay

Verse 5 describes those whose spirit God stirred to go up. Verse 4 speaks to everyone else. The two verses fit together as one arrangement:

Those whose spirits were raised up were to go up (v. 5). Others who would not go up themselves are told to support them with material help (v. 4). It is beautiful to read that they did so (v. 6).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

And they did give. Far more stayed than went, yet the record keeps their generosity, not their reluctance.

Why So Few Went Up

The offer was open to all, yet the response was thin. One writer contrasts the motives of the two groups without excusing either:

But not all were ready to go back; only a small remnant was willing. The great majority preferred to remain in Babylon. There was nothing to attract them to Jerusalem — the city of ruins, with the once magnificent temple in ruins. Those who returned loved Jerusalem, the place the LORD had chosen. Only there could they bring the appointed offerings and sacrifices… And the Jews who remained helped them generously in every way.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Hand of God Behind Every Giver

The same work of God appears in three very different people: a foreign emperor, the families who travelled, and the neighbours who paid. Nobody organised it:

In this chapter we have all the signs of a genuine work of God. A shared heart and purpose is produced in all concerned. It appears in Cyrus, without whose permission the captives could not have returned. It appears in the leading fathers of Judah and Benjamin, who were needed for the actual work of building. It appears in those who remained, who had fellowship with their brothers through their freewill offerings and so contributed towards the necessary expenses. There were no preliminary meetings to arrange things and reach agreement. The union of heart and purpose was produced only by the action of the Lord on the hearts of all alike. This distinguishes a divine work from a human one, and is the sure proof of a real working of the Spirit of God. Every needed instrument comes forward at the right moment, for the work is of God, and it must be accomplished.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Object of It All

Both the journey and the gift served one object:

To build the house of God, a remnant had been set free from the corruptions of Babylon and brought back to God's land… Those who remained in captivity were urged to help with a "freewill offering for the house of God that is in Jerusalem."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Stirred — the same God who moved Cyrus to write the decree moved the families to travel and the neighbours to give. No meeting arranged it. That agreement marks a work as God's, not man's.

- Freed — release from Babylon came with silver, gold, goods and beasts. The captives were not only set free but enriched. A foreign king's words showed a God of grace.

- Sent — only a small remnant went; the majority stayed. A city of ruins attracts nobody but those who love the place God has chosen.

- Shared — the one who stayed still had a part: he supplied the traveller and added a freewill offering. Fellowship in the work reached further than the road to Jerusalem.

- Built — help for the man and a gift for the house are two different things here. Both served one object: the house of God in Jerusalem.

Ezra 1:5 · Darby

And the chief fathers of Judah and Benjamin rose up, and the priests, and the Levites, even all those whose spirit God had stirred, to go up to build the house of Jehovah which is at Jerusalem.

Cyrus opened the door with a decree, but an open door moves nobody through it. Verse 5 records a second work, done inside the hearts of the leaders, priests and Levites, and it answers one question: what makes a small group leave a settled exile to rebuild a ruin?

Two Stirrings, Not One

The same phrase covers the Persian king in verse 1 and the returning families here. A decree, even a sincere one, could not produce a return by itself.

These were intellectual convictions, which might have nothing to do with a work of conscience or a living faith. Cyrus was even sure he was an instrument chosen to carry out God's purposes (v. 2). But all this was not enough to bring about the restoration of the captives. God intended to show that it was He Himself and no other who fulfilled His Word. That is why it says: "The LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia" (v. 1). He also stirred up the spirit of the heads of the fathers' houses of Judah and Benjamin. And He stirred up the spirit of the priests and the Levites (v. 5).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

One writer draws the general rule out of these two stirrings.

It is remarkable how God works. First He "stirs up the spirit" of this pagan king, so that he passes a decree inviting the Jews to return to Jerusalem. He then stirs up the spirit of those who did so (1:5). Whatever men do, a true revival is always a work of God.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Who Rose Up

The verse names Judah and Benjamin, plus the priests and the Levites. That list is exact.

First, note that the heads of the fathers' houses who offered themselves for the work came from two tribes: Judah and Benjamin. There were also Levites, but they did not count as a tribe, for Levi had "no portion or inheritance with his brothers. The LORD is his inheritance" (see Deuteronomy 10:8-9). This and other Scriptures make it plain that only these two tribes were restored. Some people from other tribes may have come as well.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Purpose Was the House

The stirring had one object, and the decree of Cyrus had the same one.

The object of the people's return concerned the building of the house of the Lord. This was the subject of the proclamation of Cyrus, whom God raised up for this very purpose... And for this end God worked in the hearts of those who were made willing to return to the land of their fathers.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Inward Work, Outward Providence

God was not only at work inside these people.

Verse 5 of the first chapter shows a real work of God in the souls of many, including leaders both civil and religious. It led them to seize at once the opportunity given for a return to the land of their fathers, and to re-establish the worship of God by rebuilding His house. In God's providence Cyrus himself promoted this. A providential work of God in the surrounding world matched the spiritual work of God in the souls of His people.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Those Who Stayed Behind

The stirring reached only a minority.

But not all were ready to go back; only a small remnant was willing. The great majority preferred to remain in Babylon. There was nothing to attract them to Jerusalem — the city of ruins, with the once magnificent temple in ruins. Those who returned loved Jerusalem, the place the LORD had chosen.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Test of a Genuine Movement

The agreement reached further than the travellers.

Agreement of heart and object is produced in all concerned: in Cyrus, without whose permission the captives could not have returned; in the heads of the fathers' houses of Judah and Benjamin, who were needed for the actual work of building; and in those who stayed behind, who shared with their brothers through their freewill offerings and helped cover the necessary costs. Nobody held preliminary meetings to arrange matters and reach an agreement. The action of the Lord on the hearts of all alike, and nothing else, produced this union of heart and purpose. This distinguishes a divine work from a human one, and is the sure proof of a real action of the Spirit of God. Every needed instrument therefore comes forward at the right moment, for the work is of God, and it must be accomplished.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Stirred, twice. God moved a pagan king to open the door. Then He moved His own people to walk through it, since the decree alone could not restore anyone.

- Stirred for a purpose. God stirred hearts with one object: to go up and build the house of the LORD in Jerusalem.

- Stirred inside and outside. God did a real work in the souls of civil and religious leaders, and arranged the world outside them to match.

- Stirred, but few. Only a small remnant responded. The majority preferred Babylon, since a ruined city held nothing to attract them.

- Stirred, therefore united. Agreement between king, travellers and givers came with no prior arrangement. That is the mark of a work that is God's, and such work must be finished.

Ezra 1:6 · Darby

And all they that were about them strengthened their hands with articles of silver, with gold, with goods, and with beasts, and with precious things, besides all that was willingly offered.

Cyrus had just issued his decree, and the families God stirred were packing to leave Babylon for Jerusalem. Their neighbours paid for the journey — which raises two questions: who moved these givers, and what does it mean to fund a work you are not joining?

Fellowship for those who could not go

The decree spoke to two groups: those who would go, and those who would stay and help pay.

Those whose spirits were raised up were to go up (v. 5). Verse 4 tells others, who would not go up themselves, to support them with material help. It is beautiful to read that they did so (v. 6).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Moved by God, not by the decree

The decree asked for these gifts, but the decree is not what produced them.

Next, God worked in the hearts of the neighbours of those who devoted themselves to the work of the Lord's house. They "offered willingly," as the proclamation had asked, out of their own property. They helped them with vessels of silver and gold, and so on.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Agreement that nobody organised

Notice what is missing from the chapter. Nobody called a meeting to arrange any of this.

We have here, in this chapter, all the signs of a genuine work of God. Everyone concerned comes to the same heart and purpose. Cyrus agrees, and without his permission the captives could not have returned. The heads of the families of Judah and Benjamin agree, and the actual building work needed them. Those who stayed behind agree, and they shared with their brothers by their freewill offerings and so contributed towards the necessary expenses. There were no meetings beforehand to arrange things and reach agreement. The Lord alone produced this union of heart and purpose, working on the hearts of all alike. This is what marks off a divine work from a human one, and it is the sure proof of a real working of the Spirit of God. Every needed instrument comes forward at the right moment, because the work is of God and it must be accomplished.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Not only freed, but enriched

God's people did not leave Babylon empty-handed. Their neighbours could have despised them for going. Instead they filled their hands.

This was not only a matter of freeing slaves, but of enriching them. So Cyrus was rightly representing a God of grace.… People near those who intended to go were willing to help them as Cyrus had directed. They gave silver and gold, goods and livestock, and precious things — that is, things of special value (v. 6). This shows at least that those so concerned about going to Jerusalem had not earned the contempt of the people among whom they lived.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Generosity that stopped short of going

The open wording of the decree did more than invite volunteers. It sorted them.

The proclamation did not name any person or persons who were to go to Jerusalem and build the house. It threw the door open to any Jew whose heart stirred him to go, and promised him generous help in the project ahead of him. Worded like this, it meant that those who responded would mainly be men of piety, whose hearts were alive to the glory of God and to the place of His Name. The more worldly and selfish would be inclined to stay in the comfortable homes they had built during the seventy years of captivity. They would leave the task to others who were ready to face the difficulties and hardships.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

"Strengthened their hands with precious things"

Older translations say "strengthened their hands… with precious things." The ESV has "aided them… with costly wares." One writer turns those older words into a question for us.

In the wonderful day of recovery pictured in Ezra we see men of Judah and men of Benjamin concerned about building God's house. Their names remind us of the praises of God and of the Son of His right hand. Priests, Levites, and all whose spirits God had raised strengthened their hands with, among other blessed features, "precious things." Beloved, have our hearts not been "raised" (or "stirred," J.N.D.) by the truth that has been recovered to us in our day?… What strengthening of hands should be ours! Outwardly it is a day of smallness and weakness. Inwardly we are strong in affection and loyalty to Christ as we know and enjoy these "precious things" in the power of the Spirit.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

Summary

- Stirred. God moved Cyrus. He moved the families who went. He moved the neighbours who paid. The offering was His work before it was theirs.

- Shared. Those who stayed home still had a share in the work. Their gifts were their real part in it.

- Sign. King, builders and givers agreed, and nobody called a meeting. That unplanned unity marks a work of God rather than a work of men.

- Standing. The neighbours did not despise this small group for going. They sent them off rich.

- Sifted. The open decree let each heart show itself. Some faced the hardship. Others kept their comfortable homes and left the task to someone else.

Ezra 1:7 · Darby

And king Cyrus brought forth the vessels of the house of Jehovah, which Nebuchadnezzar had brought forth out of Jerusalem and had put in the house of his god.

Nebuchadnezzar carried the temple's gold and silver into a pagan treasury. Seventy years later, a Persian king opens that treasury and hands the sacred vessels back. Why did God count these objects so important? And what does their return say about how He restores what His people have lost?

The King's Part in the Work

Cyrus was not the only heart God moved. One writer reads the king's act as proof that God had touched him too:

Finally, Cyrus himself showed his interest in the work. He restored the vessels of the temple that Nebuchadnezzar had carried out of Jerusalem and put in the house of his gods. This was evidence that his own heart had also been touched by divine power. He counted these vessels out to Sheshbazzar, the prince of Judah.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

God worked in two places at once:

God worked spiritually in the souls of His people, and He matched it with a providential work in the world around them. And so it has been again in more recent times.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why the Vessels Mattered So Much

The scale of the damage was not what set God's clock running:

There had been three deportations... The last of these three did the most damage. The temple was burnt, and very large numbers were led away captive. But the 70 years of captivity count from the first deportation, which we would call relatively unimportant. Why was this first one the important one in God's eyes? Well, it's because of the vessels. Nebuchadnezzar had taken the vessels of the Temple to Babylon, and even put them into the house of his idols. Such a thing had never happened before. True, some kings had taken silver from the treasure and even from the wings of the doors of the temple to appease the king of Assyria. But the holy vessels had never been touched.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The loss was not sentimental. It shut down the whole system of approach to God:

Without vessels, it was impossible to bring sacrifices as prescribed. No vessels, no worship! This is the tragedy. Does it not remind us of the sad fact that the idea of worship, and especially worship together, has been lost across much of the Christian world?

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Because they stood for worship itself, the gap between their removal and their return carries weight:

These vessels represented the worship rendered to God. The period of seventy years between their removal and return, as announced by the prophet, emphasizes their symbolic importance.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

The House of His Gods

Nebuchadnezzar put the vessels of the true God inside an idol's temple. One writer asks what that really changed, and then points to where it ended:

God had been dishonoured by the idolatry of the people and their kings. Was there any great difference whether the precious vessels stayed in His temple or were placed in the temple of idols at Babylon?... When wicked Belshazzar drank wine from the sacred vessels in praise of his idols, he meant to celebrate the triumph of false gods over the true God, and to set them publicly against the Lord. That same night, God answered him with judgment and death.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The vessels outlasted the empire that stole them:

No doubt Cyrus had these vessels collected and carefully guarded... How it all shows that God had not forgotten His people! When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Restored, but Not Everything

One thing never came back, and its absence shapes the whole return:

The holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for the Lord's house in Jerusalem. The ark — the centre, the highest in value, the nearest to the glory — was not there. Sadly, the glory itself had withdrawn. But in the day when the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, never to leave again.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Old Vessels, Not New Ones

These were not new vessels. The old ones came back, and one writer draws the lesson for God's people now:

What the people of God need today is not so much innovation, but a return to the basic principles that were there from the beginning — a return to the Scriptures... A genuine revival always shows itself in the discovery of the Scriptures. It is not that the Scriptures could not have been known before. Through negligence they had been forgotten.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Later in the book, Ezra hands the same kind of treasure to chosen men with a charge about who may touch it:

The ground of the choice was, that they were "holy to the Lord," as also were the vessels. As the prophet said, "You must be clean that bear the vessels of the Lord."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Taken — God dated the captivity from the first and smallest deportation. The reason was the vessels. No earlier king had put them in an idol's house.

- Silenced — Without the vessels, no one could bring the prescribed sacrifices. No vessels, no worship — and seventy years of silence.

- Kept — Babylon profaned them, and God answered that same night with judgment. The vessels outlived the empire. God had not forgotten His people.

- Returned — Cyrus counted the old vessels out to Judah's prince. Recovery means going back to what was there from the beginning, not inventing something new.

- Incomplete — The ark was missing and the glory had withdrawn. A day is coming when the glory returns and never leaves.

Ezra 1:8 · Darby

And Cyrus king of Persia brought them forth by the hand of Mithredath the treasurer, who counted them out to Sheshbazzar the prince of Judah.

Cyrus does not just free the captives — he also hands back the gold and silver articles Nebuchadnezzar had looted from the temple. Who is this Sheshbazzar, and why does Scripture give so much space to a list of bowls and dishes?

The man who received them

Two names, one man. Commentators explain the name in this verse as a Babylonian name given during the exile.

This prince was Zerubbabel. Sheshbazzar was the name the Babylonians had given him. He was born in Babylon, and his name means "stranger in Babylon." He became the princely leader of the returning exiles... In all there were 5,400 vessels of gold and silver which were handed over to Zerubbabel to take back to Jerusalem. It all shows that God had not forgotten His people. When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

He was more than one exile among many.

He was a "prince of Judah," and he seems to have held some office in Persia, since he is called Sheshbazzar... He led the Jews who volunteered to return from exile under the decree of Cyrus.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why a list of dishes matters

The list of vessels looks like a minor detail. It actually sets the clock on the whole captivity.

There had been three deportations... The last of these three was the most significant one in terms of the damage done. The temple was burnt, and very large numbers led captive. But the 70 years of captivity run from the first deportation — the one we would call minor. Why was this first one the important one in God's eyes? Well, it's because of the vessels.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Take away the vessels and something more than property is lost.

Without vessels, it was impossible to bring sacrifices as prescribed. No vessels, no worship! This is the tragedy. Doesn't this remind us of a sad fact? Much of the Christian world has lost the whole idea of worship, and above all of worship together. Concerts, performances, and all sorts of other things have taken the place of meetings for worship.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Out of the idol's house, counted item by item

Cyrus had to fetch these things out of a pagan temple before he could hand them back. Someone kept the record down to the last item.

King Cyrus had all the articles Nebuchadnezzar had taken from Jerusalem brought out of the temple of his idols. He sent them back to their rightful place. He knew that Babylon's idols were not God. The Persian treasurer, Mithredath, counted these out to Sheshbazzar the prince of Judah. The record of them was faithfully kept.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What the list leaves out

One thing is missing from the list, and it is the most valuable of all.

The holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. The ark was not there — the centre, the most valuable, the nearest to the glory. Sadly, the glory itself had gone. But on the day when the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, never to leave again.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Every instrument at the right moment

A foreign king, the builders, and those who stayed behind all move in step. No one organised it.

The Lord produced the same heart and the same aim in everyone involved. Cyrus was one of them, and without his permission the captives could not have returned. Another group was the leading fathers of Judah and Benjamin, who were needed for the actual building work. A third was those who stayed behind... There were no meetings beforehand to arrange things and reach agreement. The union of heart and purpose came from the Lord's action on the hearts of all alike... So every instrument that is needed comes forward at the right moment, for the work is of God, and it must be done.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

This pattern was not limited to Ezra's day.

Alongside the spiritual work of God in the souls of His people ran a providential work of God in the world around them. So it has been again in more recent times.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Taken. The vessels went to Babylon first. God dated the seventy years from that loss, not from the burning of the temple.

- Emptied. No vessels meant no sacrifices, so the real loss was worship itself. The same loss happens wherever performance takes the place of worship.

- Kept. They sat in an idol's temple, yet they were still there when Cyrus went looking. God had not forgotten His people.

- Counted. Mithredath counted them out item by item to the prince of Judah, and the record was kept. What God restores, He restores in order and into named hands.

- Incomplete. The ark is missing from the list, and the glory had gone. The return under Zerubbabel is real but partial; the glory comes back in full only when salvation comes out of Zion.

Ezra 1:9 · Darby

And this is the number of them thirty chargers of gold, a thousand chargers of silver, nine-and-twenty knives,

Ezra pauses the story of a nation's return to print a warehouse list: bowls, platters and knives, counted one by one. Why does God's Word keep a receipt? And why did these objects matter enough to count?

A Receipt for the Vessels

A Persian official counted the items out, one by one, to the leader of Judah. Where the list below says knives, the ESV says censers.

More important still, King Cyrus brought out all the articles that Nebuchadnezzar had taken from Jerusalem. They were in the temple of his idols, and Cyrus sent them back to where they belonged. He knew that Babylon's idols were not God. The Persian treasurer, Mithredath, counted these out to Sheshbazzar the prince of Judah. The record listed each one: 30 gold platters, 1000 silver platters, 29 knives, 30 gold basins, 410 silver basins, and 1000 other articles. The total number of gold and silver articles was 5,400.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why Bowls and Knives Matter

These were working tools. Without them, the whole system of sacrifice stopped.

Without vessels, it was impossible to bring sacrifices as prescribed. No vessels, no worship! This is the tragedy. Does it not remind us of the sad fact that the idea of worship, especially worship together, has been lost in wide parts of Christendom?

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The vessels also stood for something, and the length of their absence shows how much.

King Belshazzar desecrated the sacred vessels carried away to Babylon. Cyrus decreed their return, and some of them will come back and be put in the restored temple (Ezra 1:7-11). These vessels represented the worship rendered to God. The prophet announced seventy years between their removal and their return. That long span shows their symbolic importance.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

A Different Kind of Loss

Three waves of captives went to Babylon. The first wave lost something the other two did not.

This first captivity had a particular character. The second and third captivities brought devastation and carried away great numbers of men. The first one stripped the house of the Lord instead, robbing it of the precious objects used in the service of worship. At the time of Judah's restoration, all these objects came back, 5,400 of them. That was the most characteristic feature of the journey that brought the remnant of the people back to their land.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. Some say every object came back. Others say only part of them did.

What the List Leaves Out

One item is missing from the list, and its absence says more than the totals.

The holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. The ark, the centre, the highest in value, the nearest to the glory, was not there. Sadly, the glory itself had withdrawn. But in the day that the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, never to leave again. When Jehovah turns again the captivity of His people, it will be no feeble remnant: Jacob shall be glad, Israel shall rejoice.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Man Who Received Them

The man who signed for the goods had two names, and his story points past his own day.

Mithredath the treasurer handed them to Sheshbazzar the prince of Judah. This prince was Zerubbabel; Sheshbazzar was the name the Babylonians had given him. He was born in Babylon, and his name means "stranger in Babylon." He became the prince who led the returning exiles… All this shows that God had not forgotten His people. When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf. Nor has He forgotten His promise to bring a remnant back from the great scattering among all the nations of the world. When that return comes, a greater than Zerubbabel the prince of Judah will be the leader. The Lord Jesus, the Son of David, will be their Deliverer.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Holding What Was Handed Over

A count at the start means a reckoning at the end.

The children of Israel, the remnant who returned from Babylon, had the precious vessels of the temple entrusted to them. They received them in far-off Babylon. They had to carry them safely across all the distance in between until they came to Jerusalem. There they were to weigh them out. They had to give full account for every vessel of the sanctuary put into their hands. So if, in the middle of Babylonian confusion, God in His mercy has put these precious truths into our hands and into our hearts, let us hold fast to them as we go through the wilderness. And when we reach that holy place, let us be ready to give full account, full weight, for every truth entrusted to us.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Taken — the first captivity stripped God's house of its worship vessels, and seventy years ran between their removal and their return.

- Kept — the vessels sat in an idol's temple, and Belshazzar desecrated them, yet Cyrus brought them out again.

- Counted — a Persian treasurer handed 5,400 gold and silver articles, item by item, to a prince of Judah born in exile.

- Restored — without vessels there was no sacrifice and no worship, so the vessels went back with the returning remnant.

- Incomplete — the ark was missing and the glory had gone. The full return still waits for a leader greater than Zerubbabel.

Ezra 1:10 · Darby

thirty basons of gold, silver basons of a second [sort] four hundred and ten, [and] other vessels a thousand.

As the exiles prepare to leave Babylon, officials count out the temple articles Nebuchadnezzar had carried off, piece by piece. Why does Scripture record the exact number of gold and silver bowls — and what did those objects mean to God?

What the bowls were

The Hebrew word behind "bowls" (older translations say "basons") names a specific piece of temple equipment:

kephor, 'large cup or bowl,' probably for the wine drunk before the Lord; where Scripture speaks of blood, it uses a different word. 1 Chr. 28:17; Ezra 1:10; Ezra 8:27.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why the inventory mattered to God

One writer traces God's seventy-year clock back to these vessels:

There had been three deportations. The last of the three did the most damage: the temple was burnt, and very large numbers of people were led captive. But the 70 years of captivity count from the first deportation — the one we would call relatively unimportant. Why was this first one the important one in God's eyes? Well, it's because of the vessels. Nebuchadnezzar had taken the vessels of the Temple, took them to Babylon, and even put them into the house of his idols. Such a thing had never happened before. True, some kings had taken silver from the treasure and even from the wings of the doors of the temple (Ahas and Hezekiah) to appease the king of Assyria. But the holy vessels had never been touched.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

No vessels, no worship

The loss was not only material. One writer draws out what it cost Israel, and what a similar loss costs today:

Without vessels, it was impossible to bring sacrifices as prescribed. No vessels, no worship! This is the tragedy. Does it not remind us of a sad fact? Wide parts of Christendom have lost the very idea of worship, and especially of worship together. Concerts, performances, and all kinds of things have replaced meetings for worship. Do you know a place where you can meet with Christians in full liberty of collective worship to the Father and the Son? This is the one thing the Father 'seeks': worshippers.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The hand behind Cyrus

One writer sees two works of God running side by side — one inside the hearts of the exiles, one out in the wider world:

Verse 5 of the first chapter shows that there was a real work of God in the souls of many, including leaders both civil and religious. This work led them to seize at once the opportunity given them: to return to the land of their fathers and re-establish the worship of God by rebuilding His house. In the providence of God, Cyrus actively promoted this. Besides the valuable vessels given by Jews who did not join the journey to Jerusalem, he restored all the holy vessels of the house of the Lord, which Nebuchadnezzar had placed in the house of his gods. God's work in the souls of His people was matched by His providential work in the world around them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Counted out, and what it proved

One writer follows the vessels from the idol's temple into the hands of Zerubbabel:

Then Cyrus restored the vessels of the house of the LORD, which Nebuchadnezzar had brought from Jerusalem and put into the house of his gods (Daniel 1:2). His grandson, Belshazzar, defiled them at his shameless feast (Dan. 5:2). That same night Belshazzar was killed and Babylon fell. No doubt Cyrus had these vessels collected and carefully guarded... In all there were 5,400 vessels of gold and silver, handed over to Zerubbabel to take back to Jerusalem. It all shows that God had not forgotten His people. When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Yet one article never appears in the list, and it was the greatest of all:

The holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. The ark, the centre, the highest in value, the nearest to the glory, was not there. Sadly, the glory itself had gone away. But in the day that the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, never to leave again.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Vessels named. The "bowls" are large cups, probably used for the wine drunk before the Lord. They were working equipment for God's house, not decoration.

- Vessels taken. Nebuchadnezzar put the holy vessels in an idol's temple, something no king had done before. God dated the seventy years from that deportation.

- Vessels missed. Without them the appointed sacrifices could not be offered at all: no vessels, no worship.

- Vessels returned. Cyrus collected, guarded and released 5,400 gold and silver articles. God had not forgotten His people. His work in their hearts was matched by His work in world affairs.

- Vessels incomplete. The ark, the most valuable and the closest to the glory, was missing from the list. The glory itself returns in the day Israel's salvation comes out of Zion.

Ezra 1:11 · Darby

All the vessels of gold and of silver were five thousand four hundred. The whole did Sheshbazzar bring up, when they of the captivity were brought up from Babylon to Jerusalem.

Ezra's first chapter ends with an inventory rather than a speech. It raises three questions: who was Sheshbazzar, why does God count temple dishes so carefully, and what does it mean that freed captives go home carrying the vessels of their worship?

The man who carried them up

One writer explains where the name Sheshbazzar came from, and who this man was.

Mithredath the treasurer handed them to Sheshbazzar the prince of Judah. This prince was Zerubbabel: Sheshbazzar was the name the Babylonians had given him. He was born in Babylon; his name means "stranger in Babylon." He became the prince who led the returning exiles… In all, Zerubbabel received 5,400 vessels of gold and silver to take back to Jerusalem. It all shows that God had not forgotten His people. When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The same writer looks ahead to a further return, with a greater leader:

He has not forgotten His promise either. He will bring a remnant back from the great scattering among all the nations of the world. When that return comes, a greater than Zerubbabel the prince of Judah will be the leader. The Lord Jesus, the Son of David, will be their Deliverer.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why a list of dishes closes the chapter

One writer shows that these vessels gave the first captivity its whole character.

This first captivity had a character of its own. Devastation and the great number of men carried away marked the second and the third captivities. What marked the first was the plundering of the house of the Lord, stripped of the precious objects used in the service of worship… When Judah was restored, all these objects came back — 5,400 of them. This was even the most characteristic feature of the exodus that brought the remnant of the people back to their land… The main feature at the start of these 70 years is that the glory of the temple, the glory of the service of the worship of the Lord, was itself carried away captive.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What Babylon had done with them

The same writer explains why taking these vessels was worse than any earlier stripping of the temple.

Under Jehoiachin, Nebuchadnezzar plundered all the treasures of the house of God on a far greater scale, and smashed the vessels which Solomon had made… But, I repeat, this was a profanation with no precedent: decorating a temple of idols with the vessels made for the worship of the true God… Wicked Belshazzar drank wine from the sacred vessels with his lords, his wives and his concubines, in praise of his idols. He meant to celebrate the triumph of false gods over the true God, and to set them against the Lord in public. That same night, God answered him with judgment and death.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Counted — but not complete

The list is exact, but one thing is missing from it.

The holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. But the ark was not there — the centre of it all, the highest in value, the nearest to the glory. Sadly, the glory itself had withdrawn. But in the day that the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, no more to leave.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Two hands at work at once

Two works of God stand behind this return.

Verse 5 of the first chapter shows a real work of God in the souls of many… It led them to seize at once the opportunity they were given to return to the land of their fathers, and to set up the worship of God again by rebuilding His house. In the providence of God, Cyrus promoted this… he restored all the holy vessels of the house of the Lord, which Nebuchadnezzar had placed in the house of his gods. God's spiritual work in the souls of His people was matched by His providential work in the world around them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The comfort hidden in an inventory

One writer turns this care for dishes into comfort for God's people.

He keeps the basins and knives of His house. He brings the vessels back again to the second temple. So His care for His redeemed ones must be more tender than His care for a spoon.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Spoiled. Above all, the first captivity stripped God's house of the objects used in worship.

- Profaned. Those same vessels stood in an idol temple. Belshazzar drank from them to crown his false gods over the true God. God answered that same night with judgment.

- Counted. A Persian treasurer counted out every item into the hands of Sheshbazzar, the prince of Judah. He was born in exile, and his name means "stranger in Babylon."

- Carried. The vessels went up with the people. The return of worship was the mark of this exodus, and proof that God had not forgotten His own.

- Incomplete. The ark was not in the list, and the glory had withdrawn. The restoration was real but partial. It points on to a greater Leader and a glory that will not leave again.

Ezra 2:1 · Darby

And these are the children of the province, that went up out of the captivity of those that had been carried away, whom Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon had carried away to Babylon, and who came again to Jerusalem and to Judah, every one to his city,

Ezra 2 is a long list of names and numbers, and verse 1 is its heading. In one sentence it says who these people are, where they had been, and where they went: a nation carried off to Babylon, and a small company now walking home.

A humbling title

They are not called a kingdom here, but the people of a province — a district inside someone else's empire. One writer hears honesty in that word:

What a humbling description: "the people of the province who came up out of the captivity"! Pride forgets and hides such things. Faith, cleared and cheered by grace, can afford on the darkest day to admit the truth: Israel may change, but the Lord does not change. That is why the sons of Jacob are not destroyed. His own people may well be ashamed of themselves; they glory in Him alone, and in His grace toward them. Yet they were still under the Gentile powers, as Christ Himself pressed home to their rebellious spirits.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Called out a second time

The verse says they came up out of the captivity. One commentator sets this return beside the earlier rescue from Egypt, and notes how few joined it:

As we all know, God redeemed the people out of Egypt, and still they failed completely. They fell again and again into idolatry under their kings, until the captivity in Babylon came. When the foretold period had passed, Cyrus allowed a return to rebuild the temple, and we read, "Now these were the people of the province who came up OUT of the captivity" (Ezra 2:1). Once more God called His people out, though only a few of the many answered.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why such a list was kept at all

A register of families and head-counts can look like dry paperwork. One writer reads its survival as a sign of what God thought of these people, however little they grasped His plans:

The very existence of this list shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people, however weakly they had entered into His thoughts about His house. That is why He has kept it on record. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that He knows the names of His people and makes them known. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Names He remembers

Names and numbers can seem like the least spiritual part of the Bible. One writer ties this list to what the New Testament says about God's memory:

This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a sample page of the records God keeps. From it we may learn that He remembers His people, that He knows them by name, and that He does not forget their works. Nehemiah repeats this list (chapter 7), and adds a record of those who helped build the wall. He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16). The apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for his name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Back to Jerusalem, and back to careful ground

Each one returned to his own town — and with the return came a new seriousness about who belonged. Dennett links that new care to what the exile itself had been:

In the land of their exile they had not taken the same care over who had a right to a place and who was qualified. Babylon stands for the corruption that holds God's people in bondage through their sins. So their time in captivity was a careless time. They were suffering under the hand of their God, yet it was still a time of confusion and disorder. It had to be, since they had no temple, no sacrifices, and were without the Lord's presence. But now, through the mercy of their God, there had been a recovery... and now that the Lord's house was to be their centre once more, they were right to examine the claim of everyone who had returned from Babylon.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why the list still speaks

Commentators differ on how far this company should be called the faithful remnant. Rossier stops short of that title, yet still holds them up as a pattern:

This remnant of Judah returned to Jerusalem under Cyrus, to wait for the Messiah and welcome Him. They are not the true remnant. Even so, the Holy Spirit presents them as showing the marks a believing remnant should take on in a time of ruin. They are a most helpful example for us Christians, who now find ourselves among the ruins of Christendom: an example that teaches us how we may be witnesses of God in hard circumstances.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Province, not kingdom — the heading admits how far they had fallen. Faith can own that, because God has not changed.

- Out of captivity — God called His people out a second time, and only a few of the many answered.

- Counted by name — the list survives as proof that God takes joy in the smallest fruit of His work and knows His people by name.

- Not forgotten — Ezra's page matches God's book of remembrance. He does not overlook work done for His name.

- Home, and careful — captivity bred carelessness about who belonged. Back with God's house at their centre, the returning company tested every claim.

Ezra 2:2 · Darby

who came with Zerubbabel, Jeshua, Nehemiah, Saraiah, Reelaiah, Mordecai, Bilshan, Mispar, Bigvai, Rehum, Baanah. The number of the men of the people of Israel

God keeps a list. Ezra 2 records who left Babylon for Jerusalem, and verse 2 names their eleven leaders — a governor from David's line, a priest, and nine more.

A register God chose to preserve

Edward Dennett draws his point from the mere fact that such a list survives.

The very existence of this list shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have had only a weak grasp of His thoughts about His house. Even so, He kept this list on record. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows too that He knows and announces the very names of His people, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

There is a quieter side to the same record. F. B. Hole notices who is missing from it.

God took note of them and put their names into His record. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go He passed over in silence. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Zerubbabel named first

The order of the names carries meaning. The Bible Treasury notes that the royal name stands first, though the crown itself was gone.

They were still subject to the Gentile powers, and Christ Himself pressed this on their rebellious hearts. His first coming did not change it, because they were sinful and unbelieving... So the first named is not the high priest, but the heir without the throne of David.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Hole names the office Zerubbabel held and the size of the company these two men led.

The first name mentioned is Zerubbabel, who became the "Tirshatha," or civil governor; the second, Jeshua, the priest called Joshua in the books of Haggai and Zechariah. These were the leaders in the migration of 42,360 people, besides some servants and other possessions. The kingdom was not restored, as though the times of the Gentiles had ended.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Who the two leaders were

Arno Gaebelein traces the family lines behind these two names. He also spots a gap in the count.

There were twelve leaders. Ezra gives only eleven. Nehemiah's record adds one more name, Nahamani, making twelve in all. Zerubbabel was the leader of the returning captives. His name means "seed of Babylon." Scripture calls him the son of Shealtiel, the son or grandson of Jeconiah, so he was a descendant of David. His name appears in the two genealogies of Matthew (1:12) and Luke (3:27)... The second leader was Jeshua, also called Joshua. He was a son of Jehozadak and grandson of the high priest Seraiah. Zerubbabel the royal leader, son of David, and Joshua the high priest are both types of Christ.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Familiar names, different men

Two names here match far better-known people elsewhere in the Bible. Leslie Grant rules out the first.

The Nehemiah mentioned here cannot be the Nehemiah whose book follows Ezra, for he did not come at first, nor with so large a company (Nehemiah 2:9).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Some of the names themselves shift between Ezra's list and Nehemiah's. Two examples: Seraiah here is thought to be the man called Azariah in Nehemiah 7:7, and Mizpar here appears there as Mispereth.

One who returned from exile, Nehemiah 7:7: supposed, as in the margin, to be the same as Seraiah in Ezra 2:2.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A small company at the right place

Forty-two thousand people were nothing beside the nation's former size. Michael Hardt puts the objection those returning had to face into plain words.

"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then, the people must have grown. And now there were just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be." But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Hole names the first mark of a real revival, and answers the charge that these people were just a party gathered around a man.

There was a definite revival, and the first mark of it was this: they got back to God's original centre. Compared with the whole number of scattered Jews they were only a few. Many worldly people may have nicknamed them "Zerubbabelites." Still, they were not that. They were simply a few who cared for their God and sought His original centre.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Recorded — the list survives as evidence that God takes joy in the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that He knows His people by name.

- Omitted — God passed over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. The record marks who went and who stayed.

- Ranked — Zerubbabel stands first: the heir without David's throne, made civil governor under a Gentile empire. The kingdom itself was never given back.

- Paired — the royal leader from David's line and Jeshua the high priest are both types of Christ.

- Few — 42,360 out of a people that once counted 600,000 men and their families. Faith looked at God's word, not at the numbers, and went back to His centre.

Ezra 2:3 · Darby

The children of Parosh, two thousand one hundred and seventy-two.

The list of returning exiles opens here with one family name and one number. Why would God keep a page of names and headcounts in His word? And what does it say about Him that He counted this first family at all?

Why the list was kept

One writer says the first thing to notice is that this list exists at all. Its survival tells us what God thought of His people's response.

There are several interesting things to notice in the record. The first is that the list exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response which His grace had produced in the hearts of His people, however feebly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has caused this list to be preserved. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Numbering as a mercy

A page of numbers can feel cold. One writer finds the opposite in it.

Still, is it not a precious truth that God takes pleasure in letting His people know that every one of them is prized by Him? A sad change had come through Israel's sin, through Judah's sin, and not least through the sin of David's house. Sin gives occasion to His grace, but it cannot be without man's humiliation, and faith takes account of both. But God always waits to bless, and to give His own the proof and sense of His blessing. We see this even in the numbering of those who returned from Babylon.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Counted as sons

The list does not name each person. It counts them by family — so many belonging to Parosh, so many to the next family head. That way of counting mattered to them.

So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand plainly and clearly as sons of the covenant. Descent by natural birth, in the line of promise, mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Never before had such jealous care been necessary, and it was needed most in the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people too: none but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The decision behind each figure

Most of these names mean nothing to a reader today. They still meant something to God.

This very long chapter consists mainly of lists of names, most of them completely unknown to us. But God is pleased to take account of those who took this great step, those who went up out of the captivity, to Jerusalem (v. 1).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

A company that looked far too small

One writer imagines the objections these families had to answer before they set out. One of them was arithmetic.

"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then the people must have grown. And now there are just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be."

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The answer is not a bigger number. It is a different guide.

But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance; it looks at God's word.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The question the list puts to the reader

Another writer turns this list into a question for the reader. He keeps it separate from the question of salvation.

Dear saint of God, where are you? What feast are you keeping? Are the Lord's interests first, or your own? Your name may be in the Lamb's Book of Life. Every redeemed sinner's name is there, all of grace and mercy for Christ's sake alone. But does your name also have a place in what answers to Ezra 2?

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted. The numbering is mercy, not pride. God lets His people know that every one of them is prized by Him.

- Named. The list exists because God treasures the response His grace produced. The names of His people are known and proclaimed.

- Claimed. Each figure sits under a family head. The remnant were careful to stand clearly as sons of the covenant, as careful as a Christian should be about being born of God.

- Costly. Behind the unknown names stands a great step taken, and God takes account of those who took it.

- Small. The company looked far too few to be right, but faith takes its direction from God's word, not from the headcount.

Ezra 2:4 · Darby

The children of Shephatiah, three hundred and seventy-two.

Ezra 2 is a roll call. Verse 4 is one line in it: a family name and a count of the people who left Babylon for Jerusalem. So why does a whole chapter of Scripture consist of names and figures like this?

Why the list was kept

The striking thing about this register is not what it says. It is that God kept it at all.

The very fact that this list exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — however feebly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept the list on record. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and announced, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to take their stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

How the roll is arranged

Verse 4 sits in the first block of the list. The chapter does not group everyone the same way.

24,144 people returned from the captivity. Zerubbabel and Jeshua (or Joshua) the high priest led them, helped by nine chief men. From verse 3 to verse 20 of chapter 2, they are listed by the name of their fathers. From verse 21 to verse 34 they are listed by the name of their cities. Those listed by their cities went to live in and re-people their home cities, once they had returned to Palestine.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Descent as title

For the small group that came back, naming your father's house was not sentiment. It settled whether you belonged.

So we see that this remnant are careful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Family descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Such care had never been so necessary before. No one but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

One writer turns the same test into a question for Christians today.

Then the answer was found: only those who could "show their father's house," or could find "their register," had the scriptural qualification for a place at the table of the Lord. In other words, we must have peace with God. We must know that we are children of God because we have the Spirit of adoption. That is how we show our Father's house and trace our genealogy. Without it we do not have the divine title required. Profession is not enough.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Where the figures differ from Nehemiah

Nehemiah 7 repeats this census, and commentators differ over why some of its numbers do not match. One explanation is transmission of the text — the examples given are other families, not Shephatiah.

The gross amount in both is the same; yet the details oddly differ: how this is may not be so easy to decide. We know that numerals are especially liable to corruption, whether through the carelessness or the boldness of copyists. For instance, in Ezra 2:5 the sons of Arah are 775, in Nehemiah 7:10 they are 652.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another reading treats the two figures as two different moments: who signed up, and who actually travelled.

Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each one and kept them going on the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are here 775, and in Nehemiah we find only 652. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Few, and not troubled by it

372 is a small figure, and the whole company was small next to what Israel had once been. So one writer voices the objection that small numbers invite.

"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then, the people must have grown. And now there were just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be." But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

What the page is a sample of

The chapter is read as a glimpse into a much larger book still being written.

It is a sample page of the records which God keeps, and from it we may learn that He remembers His people, whom He knows by name and whose works are not forgotten by Him. He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16); and the apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this fact when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for His name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Named. The list survives because God treasured the response His grace produced, even a feeble one. He kept the names to encourage others.

- Placed. Each name sits under a father's house or a home city, and those listed by city went back to re-people it.

- Proved. Descent was title. What genealogy was to them, being born of God is to the Christian — and profession alone is not enough.

- Few. Numbers never settled the question — faith looked at God's word, not at how small the company was.

- Remembered. God keeps His own record of His servants and their work, and it will be opened when each one receives his reward.

Ezra 2:5 · Darby

The children of Arah, seven hundred and seventy-five.

This verse names one family head and gives one number. The line sits inside a long register of those who came home from Babylon, and it is easy to read past. Yet God had the list written down, and then had it repeated in Nehemiah. Why does He keep count of families like this one?

A Name Kept on Record

The register is not an administrative leftover. One commentator reads its survival as proof of how much God valued the movement of heart that brought these families out of Babylon.

There are several interesting things to notice in the record. The first is that the list exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response which His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have grasped His thoughts about His house only weakly. For this reason He has kept this list on record. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the very names of His people and proclaims them. This is an encouragement to everyone to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The record has a sharp edge too. What it leaves out matters as much as what it includes.

Chapter two, apart from the last three verses, gives the number of those who answered the proclamation. They are listed under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names in His record. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Counted Because Prized

This counting comes after a long collapse into sin. One writer holds two things together: the humiliation that sin brings, and God's pleasure in numbering His own.

Still, is it not a precious truth that God takes pleasure in letting His people know that every one of them is prized by Him? A sad change had come through Israel's sin and through Judah's, and not least through the sin of David's house. Sin does give occasion to His grace, but it cannot be without man's humiliation. Faith takes account of both. And God always waits to bless. He waits to give His own the proof and the sense of His blessing. We see this even in the numbering of those who returned from Babylon.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

775 Here, 652 in Nehemiah

Nehemiah's copy of this same register gives Arah's family as 652. Commentators differ on the reason. One writer holds that no one in these families is named, yet each one is known — and that the gap between the two figures has a good explanation.

Their own names are not written down, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each member and carried them through the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, and in Nehemiah only 652 are recorded. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another writer compares the two lists in detail. He points instead to the risks of copying numbers by hand, and he still finds comfort in what the two registers agree on.

On the whole the lists agree. The overall total in both is the same, yet the details differ in striking ways. How this happened may not be so easy to decide. We know that numbers go wrong easily, whether a copyist was careless or too daring. For instance, in Ezra 2:5 the sons of Arah are 775, in Nehemiah 7:10 they are 652. … The totals of the servants, the houses, the males and the ages all agree. How good it is for the heart to know that the living God takes a real interest not only in His people, but in all that is theirs!

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Listed Means Entitled

Being able to say "I belong to the sons of Arah" was not about feelings. It was the proof that let a person share in the building.

So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand clear and simple as sons of the covenant. Descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Never had such careful watchfulness been so necessary. It was needed most of all in the priests. But it was true of the people too: none but Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace first. God's grace in their hearts produced the response that put Arah's family on this list. The list records His work, not their own plan.

- Grace recorded. Because He values that response, God kept the register. He writes down the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work, and passes over in silence those who stayed behind.

- Grace counts. The numbering is not cold bookkeeping. In a day of humiliation, God lets His people know that He prizes each one of them.

- Grace knows each one. The 775 are never named one by one, yet the Lord knows them all, cares for each, and brings each one home.

- Grace gives title. A place in the register gave the right to build. Descent in the line of promise meant to them what being born of God means to the Christian.

Ezra 2:6 · Darby

The children of Pahath-Moab, of the children of Jeshua [and] Joab, two thousand eight hundred and twelve.

This verse is one line in a long register. It counts 2,812 people under the family head Pahath-moab, in two branches under Jeshua and Joab, among those who left Babylon for Jerusalem. Commentators do not treat such a line as filler. They ask why God kept it, and why family descent and exact numbers mattered so much to the people who came home.

Why the Register Exists

The whole chapter is a list. The first question is why God kept it at all:

The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. It shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. That is true however feebly they entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list safe. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. The very names of His people are known and proclaimed, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Named, or Passed Over

Not every Jewish family appears here. Many stayed behind, and the register says nothing about them:

Apart from its last three verses, chapter two gives the number of those who answered the proclamation, family by family. It names the heads and counts the families. God took note of them and put their names into His record. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go, He passes over in silence. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Family Behind the Name

The head of this household has a name that reads more like an office than a person. The same family appears again later in the story:

'Governor of Moab.' A family who returned from exile, one of whom sealed the covenant, and several had married foreign wives. Ezra 2:6; Ezra 8:4; Ezra 10:30; Neh. 3:11; Neh. 7:11; Neh. 10:14.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why Descent Was Checked So Closely

Listing people by father's house was not genealogical curiosity. It settled who had a right to share in the work, and one writer compares the weight of it to something every Christian understands:

So we see that the remnant are careful to stand clear and simple as sons of the covenant. Descent by natural birth inside the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Such careful watchfulness had never been needed before, and it was needed most among the priests. It was true of the people too: only Israelites could build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Figure That Differs From Nehemiah

The same register appears again in Nehemiah 7. Several totals there differ, including this one. Commentators differ on why. One points to the copying of numbers:

The lists agree in substance. The overall total in both is the same, yet the details differ in a strange way. How that happened may not be easy to decide. We know that numbers are very easy to corrupt, whether through the carelessness or the boldness of copyists. For instance, the sons of Pahath-moab and of Binnui are each 6 more in Nehemiah; the sons of Zattu 100 less.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer suggests a different reason. Perhaps the two figures count two different things: those who signed up, and those who went:

Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each one and kept them going through the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For example, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, and in Nehemiah only 652 are recorded. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace stirs. The journey home started with what God's grace produced in the hearts of His people.

- Grace records. God put their names in His record — each family head, each household count — because He treasures the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work.

- Grace omits. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are left out, passed over in silence.

- Grace tests descent. To be listed, a family had to prove its line, because only Israelites could build a temple to the God of Israel.

- Grace keeps count. Commentators differ over why some totals differ from Nehemiah's copy. No one doubts that the Lord knows each person He brought home.

Ezra 2:7 · Darby

The children of Elam, a thousand two hundred and fifty-four.

A single clan name and a head count sit in the middle of a long register of people coming home from exile in Babylon. Why would God keep a list like this? And what does one family's number mean to readers who have never heard the name?

Why the register exists at all

This is not leftover paperwork. One commentator says the list survives in Scripture to show how God values a willing response:

Several interesting details stand out in this record. The first is that the list exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people, however weakly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. This is why He has kept this list safe. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that He knows and announces the very names of His people.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The chapter's silence says as much as its names. Another writer notices who is missing:

Apart from the last three verses, chapter two gives details of how many answered the proclamation. It groups them under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record, while those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Where this entry sits in the list

The chapter follows an order. That order shows what this entry is: a family traced to its ancestor, not a town:

24,144 people returned from the captivity (Ezra 2:1-35). Zerubbabel and Jeshua (or Joshua) the high priest led them, and nine chief men helped. Verses 3 to 20 of chapter 2 list them by the name of their fathers. Verses 21 to 34 list them by the name of their cities. Those listed by their cities went back to live in and refill their original cities, once they had returned to Palestine.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The name Elam

Elam is a name the Bible uses more than once, and more than one family bearing it came back:

Two or more whose descendants returned from exile. Ezra 2:7, 31; Ezra 8:7; Neh. 7:12, 34.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Numbers without names

The verse gives a total, not a list of names. So did anyone get lost in the count? And why do some numbers here differ from the same list in Nehemiah 7?

The descendants of the different persons are now given. In all we find 24,144 descendants. Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all, and cared for each member and sustained them on the journey homeward. Even so He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are here 775, and in Nehemiah we find only 652 recorded. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why descent had to be counted

This verse exists because these families could still say whose sons they were. One writer shows how much hung on that proof:

So we see that the remnant are careful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Genealogy according to the flesh in the line of promise was as momentous to them as being born of God is to the Christian. Never had such jealous care been so necessary; and this where it was most needed — in the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people too: none but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A thousand, not a nation

A figure like 1,254 sounds large on its own. Set beside the whole scattered nation, it is small — and that small company marked a real revival:

Still there was a definite revival, and the first mark of it was this: they got back to God's original centre. Compared with the whole number of scattered Jews they were only a few. Many worldly people may have nicknamed them 'Zerubbabelites'. They were not that. They were just a few who cared for their God and sought His original centre.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Does a small number prove them wrong? One writer answers in a line:

But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted — this register exists because God valued His people's response. He takes joy in the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work.

- Placed — verses 3-20 list families by their fathers' names. Verses 21-34 list them by their cities. This entry belongs to the first group.

- Proven — for this remnant, proof of descent mattered as much as being born of God matters to a Christian.

- Few — against the scattered nation they were a handful. Faith looks at God's word, not at numbers.

- Remembered — the verse names no one, yet the Lord knows them all. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go get no mention.

Ezra 2:8 · Darby

The children of Zattu, nine hundred and forty-five.

A single line in a long register — one family name and a number — is all this verse gives. Yet God kept a written record of the families who left Babylon for Jerusalem, and said nothing of those who stayed behind.

A Name Put Into God's Record

The whole chapter works the same way. It names a head of a family, then counts the people belonging to him. One writer notes who appears on the list and who does not.

Apart from the last three verses, chapter two sets out in detail how many answered the proclamation, listed under the heads of their families. It names the heads and counts the families. God took note of them and put their names into His record, while He says nothing of those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

One writer sees the existence of the list as a sign of how much God valued a feeble response.

The list exists, and that shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only feebly into His thoughts about His house. Even so, He has kept this list, to show that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Nine Hundred and Forty-Five Unnamed People

Here the record names only the family head. The 945 are just a number to us. One writer says they are not just a number to God.

The descendants of the different persons are now given. In all we find 24,144 descendants. Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each one and sustained them on the journey homeward. Even so He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why Nehemiah's Figure Is Different

Nehemiah 7:13 repeats this same register, but the total for this family is one hundred lower. Commentators differ on the reason. One points out how easily numbers get damaged in copying, yet is not satisfied with that answer:

On the whole the lists agree. The total in both is the same, yet the details differ oddly, and it may not be easy to decide why. We know that numbers are especially open to corruption, through either the carelessness or the recklessness of copyists. For instance, in Ezra 2:5 the sons of Arah are 775, and in Nehemiah 7:10 they are 652; the sons of Zattu are 100 less. But to put such frequent and marked differences down to a copyist's mistake is hard to accept.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Others keep the text as it stands. Gaebelein writes of that same family, "Probably 775 had enrolled their names but only 652 went." A third writer looks elsewhere:

Leave aside the guess that copyists made mistakes. That guess is as easy to make as it is unlikely. We notice first that Nehemiah's list of the leaders of the people contains a name, Nahamani (v. 7), which Ezra 2 does not mention. Second, we see that the genealogical registers drawn up by Zerubbabel kept being updated over a longer or shorter period of time (see Neh. 12:23).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Day of Weakness, Not of Neglect

The return was a small and humbled affair. One writer draws a principle from that:

Here is the principle I want you to see. Though it was a day of weakness and humiliation, it was not to be a day of neglect but of the greatest care. God's people were to be as watchful and alert for His name as when everything stood in the full power and beauty of divine order.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Family Later On

This family name comes up once more later in Ezra.

Ancestor of some who returned from exile. Ezra 2:8; Neh. 7:13. Several of the family married foreign wives. Ezra 10:27.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Numbers Are Not the Guide

Numbers give no guidance. One writer says where faith looks instead:

Faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Recorded — God wrote down the names of those who went up, and said nothing of those who stayed in Babylon.

- Reckoned — the list names one head and counts 945 under him, yet the Lord knows every unnamed person in that number, as He knows each of His sheep.

- Reason for the gap — Nehemiah's figure for this family is 100 lower. Commentators differ: some point to copying errors, some to more names enrolled than people who travelled, some to registers updated over time.

- Required — a day of weakness and humiliation called for the greatest care, not for neglect.

- Retold — later, some of this family married foreign wives. A place on God's list was a start, not a guarantee.

Ezra 2:9 · Darby

The children of Zaccai, seven hundred and sixty.

Ezra 2 is one long roll-call of families coming home from exile in Babylon. This verse is a single line in it — a family name and a headcount — so why did God keep such a small detail at all?

A page out of God's own records

At first glance this is just paperwork. One writer says what the list really is:

This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a sample page of the records God keeps. From it we may learn that He remembers His people. He knows them by name, and He does not forget their works.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why a small response was worth writing down

Those who came back were a fraction of the exiles, and their grasp of God's purpose for His house was thin. One writer says the list survives because of what it shows about God:

The first thing to notice is this. The very existence of this record shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. This was true even though they may have entered only feebly into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has had this list preserved. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and announced. That encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to take His interests as their own, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The names that are not here

A list that includes 760 people also excludes everyone else. One commentator draws attention to that silence:

The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Numbered because their descent was clear

A family was not counted just for showing up. Its descent had to be clear:

So we see that the remnant are careful to stand clear and beyond question as sons of the covenant. Descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Never had such watchful care been so necessary... only Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Counted one by one

The chapter does not give a lump sum and move on. It counts the people group by group — families like this one, then towns. One writer sees purpose in that:

This chapter shows the definite interest God had in every individual who returned from the captivity. So it records the number from each city, and the total number too.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

When the numbers look small

A family of 760 is a small thing next to a whole nation. One commentator puts that objection into words, then answers it:

"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families... Since then, the people must have grown. And now there were just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be." But faith does not look to numbers for guidance. It looks to God's word.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Where the totals differ from Nehemiah

Nehemiah's record repeats this list. Some of the figures there do not match, though 760 for this family appears in both. One writer explains why the totals can differ:

This chapter does not give their individual names, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each one and sustained them on the journey home... If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, this list gives the descendants of Arah as 775, while Nehemiah gives only 652. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted. This verse is one line on what one writer calls a sample page of God's records. He knows His people by name.

- Counted, not crowded. The chapter counts the returning people household by household. God had a definite interest in every individual who came back.

- Counted, or silent. The record keeps the names of those who went up. Those who stayed in Babylon are passed over in silence.

- Counted if proven. A family took its place here by clear descent in the line of promise. Only Israelites could build a temple to the God of Israel.

- Counted, though few. 760 is a small number, and the whole company was small. Faith decides by God's word, not by numbers.

Ezra 2:10 · Darby

The children of Bani, six hundred and forty-two.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Ezra 2:11 · Darby

The children of Bebai, six hundred and twenty-three.

A single line in a long register: a family name, a number, and nothing more. Yet God had this count written twice — here and in Nehemiah 7 — so why do bare numbers about the returning exiles matter to Him?

A record God chose to keep

That such a list exists at all tells us how God viewed the people who returned.

The first thing to notice is that the list exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have grasped His thoughts about His house only faintly. For this reason He kept this list on record. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and announced. That encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to make His interests their own, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and turning away from God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A sample page of God's remembrance

This list is one small part of what God records.

This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a sample page of the records God keeps. From it we learn that He remembers His people. He knows them by name, and He does not forget their works... He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16). The apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for his name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why Nehemiah's figure is different

Nehemiah's list gives a higher figure for this same family, and commentators differ on why. One explanation looks at how numbers fare in hand-copied manuscripts.

On the whole, the lists agree. The overall total in both is the same. Yet the details differ strikingly, and it may not be easy to say why. Numbers are especially easy to corrupt, through a copyist's carelessness or his rashness. For instance, in Nehemiah the sons of Bebai are 5 more than here, and those of Azgad 1100 more.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer sees two different counts: those who enrolled, and those who went. He adds that the missing names take nothing away from these people.

Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all, and He cared for each member and sustained them on the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, and in Nehemiah only 652 are recorded. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The care behind the counting

The head-counting was not bureaucracy. It settled who had a right to share in the work.

So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand plainly and clearly as sons of the covenant. Descent by birth in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to a Christian. Never before had such jealous care been needed, and the priests needed it most. But it was true of the people too: they could allow no one but Israelites to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What it cost to be numbered here

Behind a small number like 623 lay a hard choice. One objection was the size of the whole company.

"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then the people must have grown. And now there were just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be."

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The name Bebai elsewhere

The name turns up again in later lists.

Two or three whose descendants returned from exile. Ezra 2:11; Ezra 8:11; Ezra 10:28; Neh. 7:16. And one who sealed the covenant. Neh. 10:15.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted — a bare number stands in Scripture because God valued the response His grace had produced in them.

- Remembered — the register is a sample page of records God keeps; work done for His name is not overlooked.

- Unnamed — the 623 are never listed one by one, yet each was known and sustained all the way home.

- Tested — the small numbers argued against going. Faith looked at God's word, not at the head-count.

- Continued — the name appears in later lists too, including one who sealed the covenant.

Ezra 2:12 · Darby

The children of Azgad, a thousand two hundred and twenty-two.

One line in the list of returning exiles records a family name and a number. Why does Scripture keep a bare number at all — and why does Nehemiah's copy of the same list count this family differently?

Why the list exists

One commentator starts from the plainest fact of all: this list has survived.

Several things in this record are worth noticing. Take the first. The list exists at all, and that shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered into His thoughts about His house only feebly. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed. That encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to make His interests their own, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Counted by father, not by town

This verse sits in the first block of the list. Later in the chapter the grouping changes.

Verses 3 to 20 of chapter 2 list them by the name of their fathers. Verses 21 to 34 list them by the name of their cities. Those listed by their cities came back to Palestine. Then they went to live in their home cities and fill them with people again. The whole people was registered according to their genealogies, as Nehemiah 7:5 tells us.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A total, but no individual names

The verse gives a number for this family, not a list of names. That silence is not a gap in God's knowledge:

Their individual names are not recorded but the Lord knows them all, and cared for each member and sustained them in the journey homeward. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The name in other lists

The name is not unique to this verse, and not to one man either:

Two men of this name, whose descendants returned from exile. Ezra 2:12; 8:12; Neh. 7:17.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why Nehemiah's figure differs

Nehemiah copies this register, and for Azgad his figure is far larger. Commentators differ on the reason. One traces it to the way numbers fare in hand-copied manuscripts:

On the whole the lists agree. The overall total in both is the same. Yet the details differ sharply, and why that is may not be easy to decide. We know how easily numbers get corrupted, through a copyist's carelessness or his rashness. For instance, in Ezra 2:5 the sons of Arah are 775; in Neh. 7:10 they are 652. The sons of Zattu are 100 fewer in Nehemiah, the sons of Bebai 5 more, and those of Azgad 1100 more.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer sets that explanation aside. He points to the register being updated later:

Set aside the guess that copyists made mistakes. That guess is as easy to make as it is unlikely. Notice first that Nehemiah's list of the leaders of the people holds a name, Nahamani (v. 7), which Ezra 2 does not mention. Second, the genealogical registers that Zerubbabel drew up were kept up to date over a longer or shorter period of time (see Neh. 12:23).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why descent mattered

These family headings were not decoration. A temple was going to be built, and not just anyone could work on it:

So we see that the remnant are careful to stand plainly and clearly as sons of the covenant. Genealogy according to the flesh in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God does to the Christian. Never had such jealous care been so necessary; and this where it was most needed — in the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people too: only Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Recorded — the list has survived at all, and that shows how precious to God was the response His grace produced in His people.

- Counted — this family stands under its father's name. Later the chapter switches to counting by home town.

- Known — the verse gives a number, not names. The Lord knows each one and sustained them on the journey home.

- Checked — descent had to be provable, because only Israelites could build a temple to the God of Israel.

- Compared — Nehemiah's figure for this family runs 1100 higher. Writers differ on why: some point to copyists slipping on numbers, others to a register updated later.

Ezra 2:13 · Darby

The children of Adonikam, six hundred and sixty-six.

Ezra 2 lists the families who came home from exile in Babylon, with an exact count of each. Verse 13 names one house, Adonikam, and gives a total readers still stop at: 666.

Why a list of names and numbers exists at all

Why did God keep page after page of names and numbers? One writer answers from the fact that the record exists at all.

The very existence of this record shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only weakly into His thoughts about His house. Even so, He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows that He knows the names of His people and announces them. That encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Six hundred and sixty-six people, not a statistic

Verse 13 counts Adonikam's descendants. It does not name them one by one. That does not make them anonymous to God.

Altogether we find 24,144 descendants. Their individual names are not recorded. But the Lord knows them all. He cared for each member and sustained them on the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The number that stands out

Readers have long noticed the figure. One writer meets it again while tracing this same household through a later return.

Of one family, the sons of Adonikam or Adonijah, "the last sons" seem to have gone up. From that family the ominous number, 666, had returned with Zerubbabel (Ezra 2:13).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Ezra itself gives the number no meaning, and no writer here treats it as a stain on the family. A Bible dictionary traces what six stands for across Scripture.

SIX. Incompleteness, imperfection (one short of the perfect number seven). Solomon had six steps to his great throne, 1 Kings 10:19, but it was not high enough to save him from idolatry. Each year he received six hundred and sixty-six talents of gold, 1 Kings 10:14, yet he had to confess that everything was vanity and a chasing after wind. The Jews at Cana had six water jars for purification, John 2:6, but those jars showed how far religious rituals fall short of meeting man's need. The number of the imperial beast will be six hundred and sixty-six, Rev. 13:18, imperfect in every respect.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The family that was finally complete

The story of Adonikam does not end in chapter 2. Years later, when Ezra led a second group home, the rest of this household went with him.

In the middle of this procession, the sons of Adonikam shine. Most of them had returned with Zerubbabel (Ezra 2:13). Now the last children (v. 13) go up with Ezra. Their names are not forgotten. So the whole family is complete, and the book of God records this special blessing here. May we also see whole families, like Adonikam's, among those whom the Lord calls to testify of Him in these final days!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why Nehemiah's figures differ

The same register appears again in Nehemiah 7, and many of the totals do not match. Commentators differ on the reason. One puts it down to the ordinary hazards of hand-copied documents.

The totals in both lists are the same, yet the details differ oddly. How that happened may not be easy to decide. We know that copyists corrupt numbers very easily, through carelessness or through boldness.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer sets that explanation aside. He points to the register itself changing over time.

Some guess that copyists made mistakes. That guess is as easy to make as it is unlikely, so leave it aside. Notice first that Nehemiah's list of the leaders of the people contains a name, Nahamani (v. 7), which Ezra 2 does not mention. Second, the genealogical registers drawn up by Zerubbabel received updates over a longer or shorter period (see Neh. 12:23).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Enrolled, but not all went

A third writer looks at the gap between signing up and setting out.

If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here and only 652 in Nehemiah. Probably 775 enrolled their names, but only 652 went.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Recorded. God kept this list because He treasured what His grace produced in His people, down to the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work.

- Counted. Adonikam's 666 are a number on the page. But the Lord knew every one of them and sustained them on the journey home.

- Ominous. Six speaks of incompleteness, one short of seven. The same figure marks the beast of Revelation 13, though Ezra draws no such link.

- Completed. The rest of Adonikam's house came up later with Ezra. Their names were kept, so the whole family stands in God's book.

- Disputed. Commentators explain the differing totals in Nehemiah 7 as copying errors, as later updates to the register, or as names enrolled by people who never travelled.

Ezra 2:14 · Darby

The children of Bigvai, two thousand and fifty-six.

Ezra 2 is a ledger of the families who came back from Babylon to Jerusalem, each with a name at the head and a number after it. Verse 14 records one of the largest of those households — so why does God keep a list like this in His book at all?

A record God chose to preserve

Start with the fact that this register survives at all. One commentator finds meaning in that:

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Heads named, families counted

What this chapter leaves out matters as much as what it includes:

Apart from the last three verses, chapter two gives the numbers of those who answered the proclamation. It lists them under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record, while He passes over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The 2,056 people behind this line have no names on the page. That silence is not neglect:

The descendants of the various people are now given. Altogether we find 24,144 descendants. Their individual names are not recorded. But the Lord knows them all. He cared for each member and sustained them on the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Numbering as a mark of God's pleasure

One writer sees God's own pleasure in a count like this:

All the same, is it not a precious truth that God takes pleasure in letting His people know that every one of them is prized by Him? A sad change had come through Israel's sin, through Judah's sin, and not least through the sin of David's house. Sin does give occasion for His grace, yet it cannot pass without man's humiliation. Faith takes account of both. But God always waits to bless. He waits to give His own the proof and the sense of His blessing. We see that even in the numbering of those who returned from Babylon.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Bigvai across the books

The name in this verse turns up elsewhere in Scripture too:

Ancestor of some who returned from exile, one of whom, bearing the same name, sealed the covenant. Ezra 2:2, 14; Ezra 8:14; Neh. 7:7, 19; Neh. 10:16.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Descent as their claim

These figures were not statistics for their own sake. Who a person descended from decided whether he belonged:

So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Descent by birth in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God does to the Christian. Never before had such careful watchfulness been necessary. It mattered most among the priests, as we shall see. But it held for the people too. Only Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why some numbers differ in Nehemiah

The numbers in this chapter do not always match the same list in the book of Nehemiah. One commentator sees no reason for alarm:

If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are here 775, and in Nehemiah we find only 652 recorded.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

He suggests one cause for that gap: "Probably 775 had enrolled their names but only 652 went."

Summary

- Preserved — God kept this list because the response His grace produced in His people was precious to Him. He records even the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work.

- Prized — by counting them, God lets His people know He values every one of them, even after sin had humbled them.

- Personally known — the page gives no names for these 2,056, but the Lord knew them all and sustained each one on the journey home.

- Proven — the count also served as a title deed. Descent in the line of promise was their claim to a place in the work.

- Passed over — the register says nothing about those who stayed in Babylon. It notes who went.

Ezra 2:15 · Darby

The children of Adin, four hundred and fifty-four.

Ezra 2:15 is one line in a long roll call: a family name, Adin, and a figure — 454. Why would God keep a clan name and a headcount in His Word? And what does a list like this say about the people who went home — and about those who stayed?

Why the List Exists

The chapter is a register of those who came back from exile to Judah. That the register exists at all is the first thing to notice.

Several things in this record are worth noticing. The first is that the list exists at all. Its existence shows how precious to God was the response which His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — even though they had only a weak grasp of His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list on record. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the names of His people are known and proclaimed, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times when everything is corrupt and people turn away from the truth.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Named and Counted — or Passed Over

A family head, then a figure: the pattern repeats down the chapter. What it leaves out matters as much as what it records.

Chapter two, apart from the last three verses, gives the number of those who answered the proclamation. It lists them under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record, while those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Page from God's Records

Not one of Adin's 454 is named here. Yet the chapter shows how God keeps records.

This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a specimen page of the records God keeps. From it we may learn that He remembers His people. He knows them by name, and He does not forget their works. In the book of Nehemiah this list is repeated (chapter 7), with an added record of those who helped build the wall. He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16). The apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for His name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

When the Figures Do Not Match

Nehemiah repeats this register (chapter 7), and some of its family totals come out differently. Commentators differ on why. One treats the difference as real and explainable:

Scripture does not record their individual names, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each one and sustained them on the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For example, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, and Nehemiah records only 652. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another points instead to how figures fare in hand-copied manuscripts:

On the whole the lists agree. The overall total in both is the same, yet the details differ sharply. How that happened may not be easy to decide. We know that numbers are especially easy to corrupt, through a copyist's carelessness or rashness. … How good it is for the heart to know that the living God takes a real interest not only in His people, but in all that is theirs!

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Small Figures, Real Obedience

Add up every family in the chapter and the total looks tiny beside Israel's past. Here is the objection, stated plainly:

"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then the people must have grown. And now there are just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be."

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Here is faith's reply:

But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace first. The return was "the response which His grace had produced." God records even "the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work."

- Named, therefore noticed. God put the names of those who went into His record. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go, He passes over in silence.

- A specimen page. This roll is "a specimen page of the records God keeps." He remembers His people, knows them by name, and does not forget their works.

- Names, not numbers. Some totals differ in Nehemiah's copy. Commentators explain this in different ways, but "the Lord knows them all."

- 454 is enough. Small numbers were the argument against going up. Faith answers by looking "at God's word," not at the total.

Ezra 2:16 · Darby

The children of Ater of [the family of] Hezekiah, ninety-eight.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Ezra 2:17 · Darby

The children of Bezai, three hundred and twenty-three.

Ezra 2:17 sits inside a long list of families who left Babylon and travelled back to Jerusalem: the name Bezai, and the number 323. Why would God preserve a line like this at all?

Why the Roll Exists

One writer starts from the fact that this record exists at all.

The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. Its existence shows how precious to God the response was that His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. That is true however feebly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has made sure this list was preserved. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and decay.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Who Bezai Was

Bezai appears three times in Scripture, and the second and third appearances tell us the family did not stop at the journey home.

One whose descendants returned from exile, and one who sealed the covenant. Ezra 2:17; Neh. 7:23; Neh. 10:18.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Names We Do Not Know

Most of the names in this chapter mean nothing to a reader today.

This very long chapter mainly consists of lists of names, most of them completely unknown to us. But God is pleased to take account of those who took this great step, those who went up out of the captivity, to Jerusalem (v.1).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

What 323 People Had Decided

Each figure in this list represents a family that had weighed up real arguments for staying in Babylon — comfort, custom, and the smallness of the group going back. One commentator sets out the objection and answers it:

"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then, the people must have grown. And now there were just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be." But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Why Descent Had To Be Proved

A list of fathers' names was how a returning family proved its right to be there at all.

So we see that the remnant are careful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Genealogy according to the flesh in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Never before had such jealous care been necessary, above all where it was needed most — in the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people too: only Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

The captivity in Babylon had completed the confusion that sin had caused long before. But those who feared the Lord were all the more careful, in a way that was not needed in the days when everything was known and in order.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Where The Figures Differ

Nehemiah repeats this roll in his seventh chapter, and some of the totals there are not the same. One commentator suggests a simple explanation:

Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each member and sustained them on the journey homeward. Even so He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, and in Nehemiah only 652 are recorded. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went. All the names recorded can be traced in other parts of Scripture.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Page From God's Own Records

The same writer reads the whole chapter as a sample page from a larger book God keeps.

This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a specimen page of the records God keeps. From it we may learn that He remembers His people. He knows them by name, and He does not forget their works. In the book of Nehemiah this list is repeated (chapter 7), with an added record of those who helped build the wall. He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16). The apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for His name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted by name. Bezai's family is in Scripture because God kept the record of those who answered His call. He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work.

- Counted, not famous. Most names here mean nothing to us; God takes account of those who took the step anyway.

- Counted, not crowded. 323 out of a nation is a small figure, and faith looks at God's word rather than at the numbers.

- Counted as qualified. Descent had to be clear, because only Israelites could be allowed to build the temple of the God of Israel.

- Counted for keeping. This list is a specimen page of the records God keeps. His book of remembrance does not overlook work done for His name.

Ezra 2:18 · Darby

The children of Jorah, a hundred and twelve.

Ezra 2 lists the families who came home from exile in Babylon, and this verse is one line of it: a name, then a figure of 112. Commentators ask why God kept such a list, and why some names are in it and others are not.

Why the Register Exists

One writer sees the survival of this list as proof of how God valued the people who answered His call to return:

The very fact that this list exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have grasped His thoughts about His house only weakly. That is why He has kept this list on record. It proves that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also proves that He knows the names of His people and makes them known. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and turning away from God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

One Family, Two Lists

This same family seems to appear under a different name in a later list. The ancestor in Nehemiah 7:24 is "apparently called JORAH in Ezra 2:18" (Morrish Bible Dictionary). Each line in Ezra 2 names only the head of a house. The two lists do not always agree on the numbers, and one writer gives a simple reason:

after_note: DELETE

Scripture does not record their individual names, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each member and supported them on the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, while Nehemiah records only 652. Probably 775 had enrolled their names but only 652 went.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Descent That Had to Be Provable

A line like "the sons of Jorah" was a claim that had to hold up. Those who came back guarded this carefully. One writer explains why:

So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Descent by natural birth in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to a Christian. Never before had such jealous care been necessary, and it mattered most in the priests. It was true of the people too: only Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Names That Are Missing

A list like this also says something by what it leaves out:

Apart from the last three verses, chapter two gives the number of those who answered the proclamation, family by family. It names the heads of the families and counts each family. God took note of them and put their names into His record. He passes over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Small Figures, Real Strength

Against the size of the nation the whole company was small, and 112 is one of the smaller entries in it:

The whole assembly totalled 42,360, plus servants and singers adding 7,537 to the number. This was only a small percentage of Judah and Benjamin, but the Lord took account of every one. Their 736 horses were nothing compared with Solomon's 40,000 stalls of horses (1 Kings 4:26). But at least Judah did have "a little strength" (compare Revelation 3:8, which the ESV renders "you have but little power").

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted because valued — God kept this list on record. It shows He treasures the response His grace produces, and looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work.

- Counted by family — the list names only the head of each house. Scripture leaves the rest unnamed, but the Lord knows them all and supported each one on the journey home.

- Counted as belonging — descent in the line of promise mattered to them as much as being born of God matters to a Christian. Only Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

- Not counted — God put the names of those who went into His record. He passes over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them to go.

- Counted though few — the company that returned was a small part of Judah and Benjamin. Yet the Lord took account of every one: little strength, noticed by God.

Ezra 2:19 · Darby

The children of Hashum, two hundred and twenty-three.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Ezra 2:20 · Darby

The children of Gibbar, ninety-five.

One line in a long register of families who left Babylon for Judah: a family name and a count of ninety-five. Why does God keep such a list, and what does a small number say about the people behind it?

Why the list exists

Why is a list of names and numbers in the Bible at all? One commentator starts there:

The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. Its existence shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — even if they grasped His thoughts about His house only feebly. That is why He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the names of His people and announces them. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways and to make His interests their own. It encourages them to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Names God knows

Scripture never names these ninety-five people one by one. That silence is not neglect:

The descendants of the different people are now given. Altogether we find 24,144 descendants. Scripture does not record their individual names, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each member and supported them on the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For example, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, while Nehemiah records only 652. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The decision behind every entry

To appear in this list, a family had to leave a settled life for a place strange to them. One writer puts the case that could have kept them in Babylon:

"We are settled in Babylon. We grew up here, and for some of us our parents grew up here too. We have got used to things. How can we leave everything behind, just to go to a place that is strange to us?"

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

A small company

Ninety-five is a small number, and so was the whole returning company. One writer states the objection and then answers it:

"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then the people must have grown. And now there are only 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be."

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

But faith does not look to numbers for guidance; it looks at God's word.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

How the chapter is arranged

Verse 20 sits in the first of four groups in this register:

Looking at this list a little more closely, we find a fourfold division. Down to the end of verse 42 it describes those who were undoubtedly of Israel — of Judah, Benjamin, or of Levi, and among the Levites both singers and gatekeepers. Then follow two other classes, the Nethinim and the servants of Solomon. The word Nethinim seems to mean "those who are given."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why descent mattered

Descent decided who could share in the work ahead, so those who returned watched it closely:

So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand clear and simple as sons of the covenant. Natural descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Such careful attention had never been so necessary, and it was needed most among the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people as well: only Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel. The ruin of the church in no way destroys its divine principles. On the contrary, in view of that ruin Scripture insists on greater care in holding fast to the word.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same test today

The question this list put to each returning family has a present form:

Then they found the answer. Only those who could "show their father's house," or could find "their register," had the scriptural qualification for a place at the table of the Lord. The same holds for us. We must have peace with God. We must know that we are children of God because we have the Spirit of adoption. Only then can we show our Father's house and trace our descent. Without that we do not have the title God looks for. Profession is not enough.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Recorded — God valued the response His grace produced. So He kept the list, as a record of the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work.

- Known — Scripture never names the ninety-five one by one. Yet the Lord knows them all, and He carried each one on the journey home.

- Costly — Every entry stands for a family that gave up a settled life in Babylon. They went to a place strange to them.

- Small — Numbers are no measure of being right. Faith looks to God's word, not to the size of the company.

- Proven — Descent mattered then; being born of God matters now. Only those who can show their Father's house have the title. Profession alone is not enough.

Ezra 2:21 · Darby

The children of Bethlehem, a hundred and twenty-three.

This verse is one line in a long register of families coming home from Babylon: a town and a number. Why would God keep such a list, and why does the town matter?

A List God Chose to Keep

The chapter lists the people who left Babylon and came back to Judah. One commentator sees God's own joy behind the record:

He has kept this list on record. It is proof that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows too that He knows the very names of His people and proclaims them. That encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to be openly on His side, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and turning away from God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Numbered Here, Known by Him

Notice what the verse leaves out: it names none of the 123. The register gives a town or an ancestor, then a figure. The silence is not neglect:

Their individual names are not recorded but the Lord knows them all, and cared for each member and sustained them in the journey homeward. Even so He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why Bethlehem

From here the register groups people by their home towns instead of by a family head. Bethlehem comes first, and the town carries more weight than its size suggests:

David was anointed in the house of Jesse the Bethlehemite, so it seems the town was his birthplace. That is why Luke 2:11 calls it the "city of David." It was also the birthplace of Jesus. Though it was "too little to be among the clans of Judah," that agreed all the better with His humiliation. Beth-lehem means "house of bread." That is a very fitting name for the place the Saviour would come from as a man — He who was the living bread that came down from heaven.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So the 123 were resettling the town where the Saviour would be born.

Small Towns, Real Testimony

The chapter opens by saying each man returned to his own city. It ends with them settled in those towns, not crowded into Jerusalem. What matters is not the size of each group but what it meant:

The temple would have meant little if no one lived in the cities of Judah. The numbers in those cities would be small compared with their size before the captivity. Even so, each city would be a testimony to the restoring grace of God. Today too, each little assembly that God restores is a testimony to His grace and faithfulness. But such testimonies give us no reason for pride.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

When the Numbers Look Too Small

A number like 123 raises an objection. If the return was God's will, why did so few come home? One writer answers the charge that a minority cannot be right:

Faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but to God's word.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Why the Two Lists Differ

Nehemiah later records the same return, and some of his figures do not match Ezra's. One commentator suggests a reason:

If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, and in Nehemiah only 652. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Proof of Belonging

Later in the chapter some could not produce their family record, and they lost their place. These lists of families and towns settled who counted as an Israelite:

So we see that the remnant are careful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Their family descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Such jealous care had never been so necessary… only Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer applies this to a later day. A time of weakness "was not to be a day of negligence but of the greatest care." God's people were to be "as watchful and vigilant for His name as when things were in the full power and beauty of divine order."

William Kelly

Summary

- Counted — God kept this list. He takes joy in the smallest results of His own work, and He makes His people's names known.

- Known — the verse names no one, yet the Lord knew each of the 123 and carried them the whole way home. A number to us is a person to Him.

- Placed — they went back to Bethlehem, the little town of David and the future birthplace of the Saviour, the "house of bread."

- Few — a tiny group in a half-empty town was still a testimony to restoring grace. Faith measures by God's word, not by headcount.

- Proven — descent had to be provable, not assumed; a day of weakness called for more care about who belonged, not less.

Ezra 2:22 · Darby

The men of Netophah, fifty-six.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Ezra 2:23 · Darby

The men of Anathoth, a hundred and twenty-eight.

Ezra 2 lists the people who returned from exile in Babylon, and verse 23 is one line of it: a town and a number. Why keep such a list at all, and why should 128 men from one small village be worth a verse of Scripture?

A Name Kept in God's Record

The register itself teaches something before any of its numbers do:

The first thing to notice is this. The very fact that this record exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only feebly into His thoughts about His house. Even so, He has caused this list to be preserved. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the names of His people are known and proclaimed, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

And what God writes down, He does not forget:

This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a specimen page of the records God keeps, and from which we may learn that He remembers His people, whom He knows by name and whose works are not forgotten by Him.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Counted by Town, Not by Father

Verse 23 does not name an ancestor. It names a place — and that shift partway through the chapter is deliberate:

From verse 3 to verse 20 of chapter 2, the people are listed by the name of their fathers. From verse 21 to verse 34 they are listed by the name of their cities. Those listed by their cities went back to live in and re-people the cities they came from, once they had returned to Palestine.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

So these 128 are not just travellers counted at a border. They are a town filling up again.

Anathoth, the Priests' Village

Anathoth was the home of the prophet Jeremiah, and it belonged to the priests:

Jeremiah is known as a prophet, but he belonged to the family of "the priests who were in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin." As far as we know, he never acted as a priest. His village of Anathoth lay a little over three miles northeast of Jerusalem. It had been given to the priests, the descendants of Aaron, of the family of the Kohathites (Josh. 21:18; 1 Chron. 6:60). Abiathar the priest came from Anathoth (1 Kings 2:26). In Zerubbabel's time 128 of its people came back from captivity under the edict of Cyrus, king of Persia, and filled the village again.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

The name itself carries a lesson:

Anathoth means "afflictions," and it answers to the cross. We have to take up our cross — how different to His, however — and to follow Him.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Small Numbers, Right Centre

128 is a small number. So was the whole company, beside what Judah had once been:

To the casual observer it must have seemed quite a small matter: about 42,000 Jews restored to the land of their fathers under the leadership of Zerubbabel (Ezra 2). In the days of Jehoshaphat, Judah could keep a standing army of 1,160,000 men. Beside that, the returned remnant was poor indeed (2 Chron. 17:12-18). It was "a day of small things," as Zech. 4:10 expresses it.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What made the small number significant was not its size but its direction:

Still there was a definite revival, and the first mark of it was this: they got back to God's original centre. Compared with the whole number of scattered Jews they were only a few. Many worldly people may have nicknamed them "Zerubbabelites." They were not that. They were simply a few who cared for their God and sought His original centre.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why the Counting Mattered

Why count so carefully? Descent decided who could take part in the work:

after

So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Physical descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Never had such jealous care been so necessary... But it was true of the people: none but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Recorded. God kept this list because He treasures even the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work. He knows His people by name, and this chapter is one page of His records.

- Rooted. From verse 21 on, the count goes by town, not by ancestor. These men went back to re-people the place they came from.

- Restored. Anathoth was a priests' village in Benjamin. It was Jeremiah's home, and these 128 men filled it again after the exile.

- Reduced. Beside Judah's old army of over a million, the whole company was tiny. It was a day of small things, and 128 is one line of it.

- Reckoned. Numbers were not the point. They stood clear as sons of the covenant, and only Israelites could build the temple of the God of Israel.

Ezra 2:24 · Darby

The children of Azmaveth, forty-two.

Ezra's list names whole villages and counts the families who came home from exile, and here one small place accounts for forty-two people. Why would God keep such small numbers in Scripture at all?

Azmaveth: a place, not a person

The name in this verse is not a father but a location, tucked between the towns of two tribes.

A village lying on the borders of Judah and Benjamin. Ezra 2:24; Neh. 12:29. Called BETH-AZMAVETH in Neh. 7:28.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So the forty-two are a village count, and the same place appears as Beth-Azmaveth in Nehemiah. That same care marks the whole chapter.

This chapter shows the definite interest God had in every individual who returned from the captivity. That is why it records the number from each city, and the total number as well.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the record exists

The list's survival shows how God viewed what His people had done.

The first thing to notice is this. The very fact that such a list exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people, however feebly they had entered into His thoughts about His house. That is why He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the names of His people and makes them known, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A sample of God's own bookkeeping

Others read the chapter as one page out of a much larger set of records God keeps.

This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a specimen page of the records God keeps. From it we may learn that He remembers His people. He knows them by name, and He does not forget their works... He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16). The apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for His name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The pull of staying in Babylon

One writer puts the case for staying, in the words the exiles themselves might have used.

"We are settled in Babylon. We have been brought up here and, for some of us, our parents have been brought up here. We have got used to things. How can we leave everything behind, just to go to what is a strange place to us?"

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Those who overcame that reasoning ended up in the register; the rest vanished from view.

God has made sure of this. The names of those who roused themselves to answer His call to return to the land stand on record in a very lasting way. The names of those who did not rouse themselves are almost entirely lost.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A remnant, not a restored nation

The totals in this chapter also settle a larger question about what the return was and was not.

The second chapter makes plain something we must grasp to understand the prophecies of the Old Testament. Only a remnant came back out of the captivity of Babylon, and a small remnant at that — some 43,000 or a little less, mainly from Judah and Benjamin. Out of the ten tribes there came only stragglers... This is proof that the return was not the fulfilment of the prophecies, but only a partial accomplishment.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Value measured by God, not by size

Small numbers tempt people to think little of their own work. One writer shows where that state of mind leaves them.

They are now shown that, in this state of mind, they were not in fellowship with the mind and heart of God. The question was not how glorious their work looked, but what God thought about it... So let us learn, along with these returned captives, that the lowliest service, however plain it looks from outside, deserves all our devotion and zeal if the mind and heart of God are upon it.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Place — Azmaveth was a village on the border of Judah and Benjamin. The forty-two are one small settlement's share in the return, not one man's family.

- Counted — God took a definite interest in every person who came back. That is why the list gives the figure for each town.

- Preserved — The list survives as evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, feeble as the people's grasp of His house was.

- Remembered — The chapter is a specimen page of God's own records. He knows His people by name, and He does not forget their work and their love.

- Weighed — The worth of any service is not how big it looks, but what God thinks of it. So even the least visible work deserves our whole zeal.

Ezra 2:25 · Darby

The children of Kirjath-arim, Chephirah, and Beeroth, seven hundred and forty-three.

A single line in a long register: three towns named together, and 743 people counted between them. Why does Scripture keep such a record? And why do these towns, with a past reaching back to Joshua, appear among those who came home from Babylon?

Why the list exists at all

This chapter records those who came back from exile, each to his own town. One writer sees the very existence of such a list as proof of what their response meant to God.

The first thing to notice is that this list exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people, however feebly they entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He kept the list on record. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the names of His people and announces them. That encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Counted by their towns

The roll shifts its shape as it goes.

Verses 3 to 35 count the people of various cities. Verses 36 to 39 add priests to the number of those returning. Verse 43 brings in the Nethinim, whose total number was 392. Ezra 8:20 says David appointed them to serve the Levites; they were probably Gibeonites whom Joshua had received (Joshua 9:23).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

So these 743 stand under their town names. Beeroth, the third name, has a history worth tracing.

One of the four cities of the Hivites which deceived Joshua into making a treaty of peace. It belonged to Benjamin (Joshua 9:17; Joshua 18:25). It is identified with Bireh, about 7 miles north of Jerusalem. People of the city were called Beerothites, and 'children' or 'men of Beeroth' on returning from exile (Ezra 2:25; Neh. 7:29).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Three towns out of Joshua 9

Kiriath-arim (Kiriath-jearim), Chephirah and Beeroth are not a random cluster. They were Gibeon's allies, the people who tricked Israel into a peace treaty.

These allied peoples included the Hivites, who had four cities: Gibeon, Chephirah, Beeroth, and Kirjath-jearim. The heads of these cities planned together. Others of their nation reached for the sword, but these men used a trick to get what they wanted.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

That trick cost them their freedom. It also tied them for good to the place of God's worship.

It is true that God allowed them to bear a certain mark of degradation as a result. Slavery was the only course left open righteously… After the treaty, to put them to death would have been fresh sin, a crime. The name of the Lord had been solemnly given, and no one can ever trifle with that. On the other hand, the Gibeonites were brought down to the lowest services for the sanctuary of the Lord. So it was made plain that nothing preserved them but His name. They were attached to the sanctuary, but with the brand of slavery on them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Centuries later, men from those towns are back to build the temple. The Nethinim counted further down this same roll were probably Gibeonites too.

Why descent had to be proven

One writer draws out what all this counting was for.

So we see that the remnant are careful to stand simple and clear as sons of the covenant. Physical descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Never before had such careful watchfulness been needed… none but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same writer presses why a wrecked situation calls for more care, not less.

The Babylonian captivity had completed the confusion which sin had caused long before. But those who feared the Lord took more care than was needed in the days when everything was known and in order. Restoration is always difficult. True grace submits to Scripture. The flesh always craves what we do not have, despises what we do have, and attempts imitations, substitutes and inventions of its own.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The register that lasts

One writer sets another register beside the rolls of earthly towns.

Our citizenship is in heaven. No one will have the privilege of entering the gates of the holy city, the new Jerusalem, except those whose names are written in the Lamb's book of life. That is the heavenly register of saints, called with a holy calling. It never goes through the periodic cancellations that the often faulty citizen-rolls of earthly cities go through.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted because prized. God kept this list as evidence that He "looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work."

- Counted by home. From verse 3 the roll groups people by their cities. Beeroth lay in Benjamin, about seven miles north of Jerusalem.

- Counted though once enemies. These three were Hivite cities that tricked Joshua. Nothing preserved them but the Lord's name, and it tied them to His sanctuary.

- Counted, therefore checked. Descent in the line of promise mattered: "none but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel." Ruin called for more care over Scripture, not less.

- Counted in heaven. Earthly rolls could be cancelled; the Lamb's book of life cannot.

Ezra 2:26 · Darby

The children of Ramah and Geba, six hundred and twenty-one.

This verse is one line in a long roll call of the people who came back from exile in Babylon. It raises two questions: why does God keep such a list at all, and why does the list count these families by their hometowns?

A Register God Preserved

The list itself is the first thing to notice. One writer reads it as evidence of what God treasures:

That this list exists at all shows how precious to God was the response which His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only weakly into His thoughts about His house. Even so, He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. He knows the names of His people, and He proclaims them. All this encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Counted By Their Towns

The chapter counts in two ways, and this verse belongs to the second. The switch matches what these families went back to do:

Verses 3 to 20 of chapter 2 list them by the name of their fathers. Verses 21 to 34 list them by the name of their cities. Those listed by their cities went to live in and re-people the cities they came from, once they had returned to Palestine. Nehemiah 7:5 tells us that the whole people was entered in a register by their genealogies.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Ramah and Geba

Both towns sat in Benjamin. Ramah stood on the border between the two kingdoms, and kings fought over it:

City of Benjamin. It was on the frontier between Judah and Israel. Baasha, king of Israel, tried to build up the place as a fort against Asa, king of Judah. But Asa asked the king of Syria for help, and Syria attacked Israel, so the plan came to nothing... Called RAMA in Matthew 2:18.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Geba appears in this verse under a different spelling, and it had a particular standing among Benjamin's towns:

Levitical city in Benjamin... It seems that while Saul was king the Philistines kept a garrison there, and Jonathan struck it down. 1 Samuel 13:3. Long afterwards Asa built or rebuilt the city. It is called GABA in Joshua 18:24, Ezra 2:26 and Nehemiah 7:30, and GIBEAH in 1 Samuel 13:2-16 and 14:2-16.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A Day of Small Things

The 621 of this verse is a small number, and so is the whole company. Set against the nation's past strength, the return looks tiny:

To a casual observer it must have seemed quite a small matter — about 42,000 Jews brought back to the land of their fathers under the leadership of Zerubbabel (Ezra 2). Remember that in the days of Jehoshaphat Judah could keep a standing army of 1,160,000 men. Next to that, the returned remnant was poor indeed (2 Chronicles 17:12-18). It was "a day of small things," as Zechariah 4:10 puts it.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Yet filling each town again mattered. Its small size is no reason for shame, and no reason for pride:

The temple would have meant little if no one lived in the cities of Judah. The numbers in the cities would be small compared with their size before the captivity. Even so, each city would be a testimony to the restoring grace of God. It is the same today. Each little assembly that God restores is a testimony to His grace and faithfulness. Yet such testimonies are far from being an occasion for our own pride.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Named, Or Passed Over

The list names those who went. It leaves out those who stayed behind, and that silence says something:

Apart from its last three verses, chapter two gives the numbers of those who answered the proclamation, named under the heads of their families. The list names the heads and counts the families. God took note of them and put their names into His record. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go He passes over in silence. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Kept. God kept this list because the response His grace produced in His people was precious to Him. He notices the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and He makes the names known.

- Placed. From verse 21 on, the list counts the families by their towns, not by their fathers. They were going back to live in the cities they came from.

- Located. Ramah and Geba both stood in Benjamin. Ramah was a border town, called Rama in Matthew 2:18. Geba was a Levitical city, and Asa rebuilt it.

- Few. 621 here, and some 42,000 in all. Jehoshaphat once had an army of over a million. This was a day of small things.

- Named. Every town filled again was a witness to God's restoring grace. Those whose hearts never stirred them to go have no name in the list.

Ezra 2:27 · Darby

The men of Michmas, a hundred and twenty-two.

Ezra 2 counts the people who came home from Babylon, town by town, and this verse is one line of that count. Why would God keep a headcount from one small village in Benjamin?

A Name on God's Register

One writer sees in the survival of this chapter a sign of how much the people's response meant to God:

Notice this first. The very existence of this record shows how precious to God was the response of His people. His grace had produced that response in their hearts, however weakly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list safe. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the very names of His people and announces them. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to take His interests as their own, and to stay faithful in times of corruption.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Michmas: The Town Behind the Number

Michmas, also spelled Michmash, had a history before this list. It had already appeared in Israel's story as a battlefield:

City and mountain pass in the tribe of Benjamin. It was where Jonathan struck down the Philistine garrison. The victory might have been greater, but Saul distressed the people by forbidding them to eat until evening. Men of this town returned from the exile.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Counted — and the Uncounted

The chapter names heads of families and tallies the people under them. What it leaves out is as telling as what it records:

Chapter two, apart from the last three verses, gives details of the number of those who answered the proclamation. It names them under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record, while He passes over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Back to Their Own Places

This verse counts the men of Michmas by their town, not by their family head. One writer comments on these towns of Judah and Benjamin, where the returning families settled again:

There again the order is not perfect; Judah even goes a little beyond their limits at Beer-sheba. Yet alongside these defects there was a real desire in each one to occupy the place God assigned to him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why Such a Careful Count

This count sits inside a chapter concerned with proof of descent. One writer explains what was at stake:

So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand simple and clear as sons of the covenant. Descent by birth in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Never had such careful watchfulness been so necessary. It was needed most among the priests. But it was true of the people as well: no one but Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

When the Figures Differ

The same register appears again in Nehemiah, and some totals differ between the two accounts. One writer suggests a simple reason:

Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all, and cared for each one and sustained them on the journey home. Even so He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, and in Nehemiah only 652 are recorded. Probably 775 had enrolled their names but only 652 went.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Recorded — God wanted His people's response written down, so the list survives. He notices the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work.

- Named — God named and numbered those who went, and left those who stayed behind in silence.

- Placed — Michmas was a real town in Benjamin with a real history, and its 122 men went back to the place God had assigned them.

- Proven — The count sits in a chapter about proving descent. The returning people took care to stand clear as sons of the covenant.

- Known — The 122 men are never named one by one. Yet the Lord knew each of them, cared for each, and brought them home.

Ezra 2:28 · Darby

The men of Bethel and Ai, two hundred and twenty-three.

One line in a long roll call: 223 men, counted by their home town instead of by their ancestor. Both towns carry a heavy past — one had been Israel's chief centre of idol worship, the other a burnt heap — so why does God keep the count at all?

Why the list exists

Chapter 2 is a register of those who came back from Babylon. One writer finds it striking that such a list exists at all:

The very fact that this list exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have grasped His thoughts about His house only weakly. Still, for this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows that He knows the names of His people and makes them known, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and turning away from God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The list has a silence in it too:

God took note of them and put their names into His record, while He passes over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Counted by town, not by father

Verse 28 sits in a distinct block of the chapter, where the labels change:

There were 24,144 people who returned from the captivity under the leadership of Zerubbabel and Jeshua, the high priest, helped by nine chief men. Verses 3 to 20 of chapter 2 list them by their fathers' names. Verses 21 to 34 list them by the names of their cities. Those listed by their cities went to live in and re-people their home cities, once they had returned to Palestine.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

So these 223 form a resettlement group, listed by the ground they were going back to.

Bethel: from house of God to house of folly

The name itself is a promise, and its history is a warning:

Bethel means "House of God." The place was sacred, because there God showed Himself to Jacob and in grace pledged Himself to His servant (Gen. 28:10-22). Now one of Jeroboam's calf idols stood there (1 Kings 12:28-29). So Jehovah spoke of the place with contempt as Bethaven — "house of folly" (Hosea 4:15).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Yet men from that town stand on this list of returning exiles.

Ai: a heap that was rebuilt

Ai's name matches its fate. One writer says the name "means 'ruins'", and that "Abraham built his altar between Bethel (House of God) and Ai" (Arno Clemens Gaebelein). A dictionary fills in what happened to the city later:

Ai was a royal city of Canaan. Joshua conquered it by a clever plan, after the sin of Achan had caused an earlier defeat. He burned it and made it a "heap." Joshua 7:2-5; Joshua 8:1-29; Joshua 10:1-2. It stood near Bethel, in the land given to Benjamin, and it was apparently rebuilt, since Ezra 2:28 and Nehemiah 7:32 mention it.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Who came back

Commentators place Bethel differently. The dictionary puts it in Benjamin's land. Another writer puts it in Ephraim, in the north, and draws a conclusion from that:

Are we to suppose that in the return of God's people to the land in Ezra's and Nehemiah's time only those belonging to the southern kingdom returned? There is evidence that in some cases it was not so. Ezra 2:28, for instance, tells us of 223 men of Bethel and Ai returning. Bethel was in Ephraim, and it was the centre of the idol worship set up by Jeroboam.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

A small number, the right place

Next to the whole scattered nation, this return was small:

Still there was a definite revival, and the first mark of it was this: they got back to God's original centre. Compared with the whole number of scattered Jews they were only a few. Many worldly people may have nicknamed them "Zerubbabelites." Yet they were not that. They were just a few who cared for their God and sought His original centre.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Named. God kept this register because He values the response His grace produces. He takes joy in the smallest fruit of His work.

- Unnamed. The silence speaks too. God passes over those whose hearts did not move them to go.

- Ruined. Bethel had sunk from "house of God" to "house of folly," and Joshua had burned Ai into a heap — yet both towns supply men for this list.

- Rebuilt. Counted by city, not by ancestor, these 223 went back to re-people their own ground — the town Joshua burned was standing again.

- Recentred. The mark of a real revival here is not size but direction — a few who cared for their God and got back to His original centre.

Ezra 2:29 · Darby

The children of Nebo, fifty-two.

Fifty-two people from one small town sit inside a long list of those who came back from Babylon to Judah. Why does God keep a record this detailed? And why are these people counted under a town name instead of a father's name?

A list God chose to preserve

Commentators say the first thing to notice about this list is that it exists at all.

This list exists, and that alone shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only weakly into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list safe. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows too that He knows the very names of His people and announces them. That is an encouragement to everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Counted by their town

The chapter counts a whole company, and part way through it the pattern of the list changes. Nebo belongs to the second half.

24,144 people returned from the captivity. Zerubbabel and Jeshua (or Joshua) the high priest led them, helped by nine chief men. Verses 3 to 20 of chapter 2 list them by the name of their fathers. Verses 21 to 34 list them by the name of their cities. Those listed by their cities went back to live in their home towns and fill them again, once they had returned to Palestine.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

So "the sons of Nebo" does not mean a man's descendants. A reference work on Bible names sums up what the place was:

A city whose inhabitants or 'children' returned from exile.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The names that are missing

A list like this has two sides. It names those who went. Its silence covers those who did not.

Apart from the last three verses, chapter two gives the number of those who answered the proclamation. It names them under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record. But He passed over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Small numbers

Figures like fifty-two, forty-two, and fifty-six make the whole return look tiny — and the writers admit the objection openly, putting it in the mouth of a critic:

"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then, the people must have grown. And now there were just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be."

The answer given is short:

But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Proof of descent

Commentators note how carefully the returning people guarded their line of descent.

after-note: DELETE-NOT-USED

So we see that the remnant are careful to stand clear and unmistakable as sons of the covenant. Descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God does to the Christian. Such careful watching had never been so necessary. It was needed most where it mattered most: in the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people too: none but Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Others draw the same principle out as a demand for reality rather than profession. One writer applies it to a day when the church is in confusion: "we are entitled to demand that they shall prove their genealogy… because now people generally take the place of Christians without reality."

William Kelly

Summary

- Grace first. The return came from God's grace working in His people. He kept this list because He values the smallest fruit of His own work.

- Register. This verse is one line of that list: fifty-two people from the town of Nebo. From verse 21 on, the list groups families by home town, because they went back to fill those towns again.

- Recorded. God wrote down the names of those who answered the call. Those who stayed in Babylon go unnamed.

- Few. Small numbers can make the return look like a failing minority. Faith takes its direction from God's word, not from a head count.

- Proven. What descent was to them, being born of God is to the Christian. It has to be real, not just claimed.

Ezra 2:30 · Darby

The children of Magbish, a hundred and fifty-six.

One line in a long list: a family or town called Magbish sends 156 people home from exile to Judah. Why would God keep a written record of so small a group, and what does it mean that they are counted by place rather than by ancestor?

A Line in God's Register

The very survival of this list says something about God before it says anything about the people in it:

The first thing to notice is this. The very existence of this record shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only feebly into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Counted by Their Town

Magbish sits in a stretch of the list where the pattern changes. Earlier entries name an ancestor; these name a place. The change marks where these people were going:

24,144 people (Ezra 2:1-35) returned from the captivity. Zerubbabel and Jeshua (or Joshua) the high priest led them, helped by nine chief men. From verse 3 to verse 20 of this chapter, the list names them by their fathers. From verse 21 to verse 34 it names them by their cities. Those listed by their cities went to live in and re-people the cities they came from, once they had returned to Palestine. The whole people was registered by their genealogies, as Nehemiah 7:5 tells us.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Numbers That Do Not Always Match

The same roll appears again in Nehemiah 7, and the figures there do not always agree with Ezra's. One writer offers a plain explanation:

Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each one and sustained them on the journey homeward. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are here 775, and in Nehemiah we find only 652 recorded. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Small Company, Fully Reckoned

Magbish's 156 is a small number, and the whole company was small too:

The whole assembly totalled 42,360, plus servants and singers adding 7,537 to the number. This was only a small percentage of Judah and Benjamin, but the Lord took account of every one.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The towns they returned to were small as well:

The numbers in the cities would be small compared with their size before the captivity. Yet each city would be a testimony to the restoring grace of God. Today also, each little assembly that God restores is a testimony to His grace and faithfulness. But such testimonies give us no reason for pride. We are thankful for God's goodness, and our own weakness only humbles us.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why Being on the List Mattered

For these families, the register was not mere bookkeeping:

So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand simple and clear as sons of the covenant. Genealogy according to the flesh in the line of promise was as important to them as being born of God is to the Christian. Never had such careful watchfulness been so necessary. This mattered most of all in the priests, but it was true of the people too: only Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer applies this to Christians today:

The answer was found: only those who could "show their father's house," or could find "their register," had the scriptural qualification for a place at the table of the Lord. In other words, we must have peace with God. We must know that we are children of God through having the Spirit of adoption, so that we can show our Father's house and trace our genealogy. Without that, we do not have the divine title required. Profession is not enough.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Recorded — The list survives because God delights in the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. He makes the names of His people known, to encourage others to stay faithful.

- Reckoned — The returning company was only a small part of Judah and Benjamin. Yet the Lord took account of every one.

- Rooted — From verse 21 onward the list names people by their city, not their father. They were going back to re-people the towns they came from.

- Reviewed — Ezra's figures sometimes differ from Nehemiah's. One suggested reason: more people enrolled their names than went.

- Recognised — A place in the register had to be proved, not just claimed. Commentators apply this to the Christian: profession alone is not enough.

Ezra 2:31 · Darby

The children of the other Elam, a thousand two hundred and fifty-four.

This verse is a single line in a long register. It names a second family called Elam — one Elam has already appeared earlier in the chapter — and counts 1,254 people beside the name. Why does God fill a chapter of Scripture with names and numbers? And why does He write this family into it?

A name kept on record

One writer starts with the fact that this list has survived at all:

The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only weakly into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It is evidence too that He knows and announces the very names of His people, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Where this verse sits in the list

Verse 31 sits in the second half of the register. One writer sets out how the chapter is arranged:

24,144 people returned from the captivity (Ezra 2:1-35). Zerubbabel and Jeshua (or Joshua), the high priest, led them, helped by nine chief men. Verses 3 to 20 of chapter 2 list them by the name of their fathers. Verses 21 to 34 list them by the name of their cities. The families listed by their cities went back to live in their home cities and fill them with people again, once they had returned to Palestine. Nehemiah 7:5 tells us that the whole people was registered according to their genealogies.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Counted — and the silence over everyone else

The chapter counts those who came. Another writer notices who is missing from it:

Chapter two, apart from the last three verses, gives the number of those who answered the proclamation. It names them under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record, while those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why descent had to be proved

To be listed here, a family had to show it belonged to Israel. That was not bureaucracy; it decided who could build God's house at all:

So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Being able to trace their descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to a Christian. Such careful attention had never been so necessary, above all in the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people too: none but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A people deliberately unmixed

Names like this one were checked with a strictness their ancestors had never used. The captivity itself had taught them why:

In earlier days one priest followed another with no examination beforehand. No one checked genealogy, and children came into their father's place and enjoyed the privileges God had granted them. But Israel now, through the great grace of God, had to recover their position. This was not the beginning of their history, nor the power suited to a beginning. It was a return, and from now on the disorder that sin had brought in could not be endured. So even among those who had come back to Judea, anyone who could not produce his genealogy was set aside. It was weakness, but it was faithfulness.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same care now

One writer applies this to his own readers:

But what I call your attention to is this principle. It was a day of weakness and humiliation. Even so, it was not to be a day of negligence but of the greatest care. God's people were to be as watchful for His name as when things were in the full power and beauty of divine order. I hold this to be very precious for ourselves now.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Recorded. God kept the list because He treasured what His grace had produced in His people, even though they grasped His purpose only in part.

- Counted. God named and numbered every family who came, and passed over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them to go.

- Placed. The register runs first by fathers' names, then by cities, so returning families could fill their home towns again.

- Proved. Each family had to prove its descent, and only Israelites could build the temple of the God of Israel.

- Applied. A day of weakness calls for the same watchfulness as the days of full order, not for slack standards.

Ezra 2:32 · Darby

The children of Harim, three hundred and twenty.

One line in a long roll of families: the sons of Harim, counted at 320, among those who left Babylon for Jerusalem. A chapter of names and numbers raises a simple question. Why would God keep one household's name and an exact figure on record for all to read?

A Name God Chose to Keep

One writer starts from the mere fact that such a list survives at all:

The first thing to notice is this. The fact that such a record exists shows how precious to God the response of His people was. His grace had produced that response in their hearts, however feebly they had entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the very names of His people and proclaims them, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The same list also speaks by what it leaves out:

The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record. He passed over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Every One Prized

A count of 320 looks like a dry detail. Yet one writer finds God's pleasure in such numbering:

Is it not a precious truth that God takes pleasure in letting His people know that He prizes every one of them? A sad change had come through Israel's sin and Judah's sin, and not least through the sin of David's house. Sin gives occasion to His grace, yet it cannot be without man's humiliation. Faith takes account of both. But God always waits to bless and to give His own the proof and sense of His blessing — as we see even in the numbering of those who returned from Babylon.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Sons of the Covenant

Harim's people appear as a family line. Every group in the list had to be clear about where it came from:

So we see that the remnant are careful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Descent according to the flesh in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God does to the Christian. No time had ever called for such careful watchfulness, and it was needed most among the priests. It was true of the people too: only Israelites could have a part in building a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A Day of Small Things

Set beside Israel's earlier strength, figures in the hundreds look tiny:

To a casual observer, the return of about 42,000 Jews to the land of their fathers under Zerubbabel must have seemed a small matter. In the days of Jehoshaphat, Judah could keep a standing army of 1,160,000 men. Beside that, the returned remnant was poor indeed. It was "the day of small things," as Zechariah 4:10 puts it.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

So what should guide a small company? One writer answers plainly:

But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

When the Figures Differ

Nehemiah repeats this register, and some of its totals do not match Ezra's. Commentators differ on why. One points to a gap between those who enrolled and those who went:

The list does not give their individual names, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each one and carried them through the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, while Nehemiah records only 652. Most likely 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another writer points to copying as one known source of such slips, without settling the matter there:

The overall total in both is the same, yet the details differ oddly, and how this happened may not be easy to decide. We know that numbers are very easy to corrupt, whether through a careless copyist or a bold one... To put such frequent and marked differences down to a copyist's mistake is a hard saying.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Called. This verse sits in a list of people who left Babylon at God's call. The list itself proves their response mattered to Him.

- Counted. God numbers His people because they are His. The count of 320 says He prizes every one of them.

- Named. God names those who went for all time. He passes over those who stayed in silence.

- Proven. Harim's household stands in the roll as sons of the covenant. Each family had to show clear descent before sharing in the work.

- Small. The totals are tiny beside Israel's former strength. Faith takes its direction from God's word, not from the size of the company.

Ezra 2:33 · Darby

The children of Lod, Hadid, and Ono, seven hundred and twenty-five.

Verse 33 is a single line in the register of those who came back from exile: 725 people from the towns of Lod, Hadid, and Ono. Why does Scripture keep a roll of small towns and their numbers?

From Families to Towns

The list is not built in one way throughout. Part of it counts people by the city they came from, and verse 33 sits in that part.

Verses 3 to 35 count the people of the various cities. Then verses 36 to 39 show that priests were included among those returning. Verse 40 speaks of Levites, and verses 41-42 of singers.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the Record Exists

Why keep such a record at all? One writer answers from the fact that the list exists.

This chapter gives us a register of the people of the province who came up out of the captivity, whom Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon had carried away to Babylon, and who returned to Jerusalem and Judah, each to his own town. There are several interesting details to notice in the record. The first is that the list's very existence shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people, however feebly they took in His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list on record. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows too that the very names of His people are known and announced, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Names That Are Missing

The record has a silence in it as well.

Apart from its last three verses, chapter two gives the numbers of those who answered the proclamation, listed under the heads of their families. It names the heads and counts the families. God took note of them and put their names into His record. But those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Counted, Though Few

A count this small marks a sad change in Israel's story. That is exactly where the comfort lies.

Still, is it not a precious truth that God takes pleasure in letting His people know that every one of them is prized by Him? A sad change had come through Israel's sin and through Judah's sin, and not least through the sin of David's house. Sin gives occasion to His grace, yet it cannot come without man's humiliation. Faith takes account of both. But God is always waiting to bless His own, and to give them the proof and the sense of His blessing. We see it even in the numbering of those who returned from Babylon.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Real Places, Still There

These towns did not vanish from history. One of them turns up again in the New Testament under another name.

Some may be interested to know that the Lydda of the New Testament is none other than the Lod of 1 Chronicles 8:12; Ezra 2:33; Nehemiah 7:37 and Nehemiah 11:35. It is still called Ludd or Lidi today... Ono, Hadid, and Neballat were linked with Lod long ago, and each can still be clearly identified today under a changed name.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Ono comes up again later, when opponents press for a meeting away from Jerusalem.

It is as if they said: do not be so narrow and exclusive. Come down from your sacred enclosure to "one of the villages in the plain of Ono." "Let us meet together." Come down, and give us your approval in the plain of Ono. Do you ask what this plain of Ono was? Turn to Nehemiah 11:35: "Lod, and Ono, the valley of craftsmen." Leave the one centre of worship inside the walls of Jerusalem, and come down to any one of the villages of "the craftsmen." They knew well that if the true worship of God was set up in that holy place, they would feel, as the Ephesians did later, that their craft was in danger.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Named. This part of the record counts people by their town, not only by their ancestor.

- Prized. God kept the record because He values the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work, even when His people hardly understand His purpose.

- Counted. A number this small is humbling, yet the record proves God delights to let each of His own know they are prized by Him.

- Omitted. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence; the record holds the names of those who answered God's call.

- Located. The record keeps real towns: Lod is the New Testament's Lydda, and Ono is the plain where opponents later wanted a meeting away from Jerusalem.

Ezra 2:34 · Darby

The children of Jericho, three hundred and forty-five.

Ezra 2:34 is one line in a long register of those who came home from exile in Babylon. It counts 345 people from Jericho. Why would God preserve a headcount from a single small town, and why is that town Jericho of all places?

A list God chose to keep

The chapter is a roll-call. Why did God keep such a list?

The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. Its existence shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. It was precious however feebly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has preserved this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and announced. That is an encouragement to all: to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The counting cuts both ways.

Chapter two, apart from the last three verses, gives the numbers of those who answered the proclamation. They are named under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record, while the list passes over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Counted by hometown

Verse 34 sits in a distinct block of the list. The register changes its basis part way through.

From verse 3 to verse 20 of chapter 2 they are listed according to the name of their fathers, and from verse 21 to verse 34 according to the name of their cities. Once they had returned to Palestine, those listed by their cities went to live in their home towns and fill them again. The register covered the whole people according to their genealogies, as Nehemiah 7:5 tells us.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

So "the sons of Jericho" are not one man's descendants. They are a town's people, going back to fill their home town again.

The town itself

Jericho is not a neutral name on this list. Its history runs from Moab's occupation to a healed spring.

Jericho was allotted to Benjamin (Joshua 18:21), but later Eglon the king of Moab took it over. It is called "the city of palm trees" (Deuteronomy 34:3; Judges 1:16; Judges 3:13; 2 Chronicles 28:15). Afterwards "sons of the prophets" lived there. They said the situation of the city was pleasant, but the water was bad. It was Elisha's first miracle: he threw in salt and the water was healed. It was the ministry of heavenly blessing in the place of the curse (2 Kings 2:18-22). Some who returned from exile are described as "children of Jericho" (Ezra 2:34; Nehemiah 7:36).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Small numbers, real account

Three hundred and forty-five is a small figure, and so is the total the chapter reaches.

The whole assembly totalled 42,360, with servants and singers adding another 7,537 to the number. This was only a small percentage of Judah and Benjamin, but the Lord took account of every one. Their horses numbered 736 — nothing compared to Solomon's 40,000 stalls of horses (1 Kings 4:26). But at least Judah did have "a little strength" (compare Revelation 3:8).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the names had to be exact

Why such exactness about names and numbers?

So we see that the remnant are careful to stand clear and unmistakable as sons of the covenant. Descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God does to the Christian. Never before had such jealous care been necessary, and above all among the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people too: none but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel. The captivity in Babylon had completed the confusion that sin had caused long before. But those who feared the Lord were all the more careful, in a way that was not needed in the days when everything was known and in order. Restoration is always difficult.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Called. A proclamation went out, and this verse records one town's answer to it — 345 people who moved.

- Counted. God preserved the names because He values the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work. Those who did not stir themselves are left out.

- Placed. From verse 21 on, people are listed by city rather than by father, because they were going back to re-people the towns they came from.

- Cleansed. Jericho was a place of curse. A prophet healed its water, and now its people are named among those coming home.

- Kept. The total was a small fraction of Judah and Benjamin. Yet the Lord took account of every one, and every one had to prove he belonged.

Ezra 2:35 · Darby

The children of Senaah, three thousand six hundred and thirty.

One line ends a long count: a single family group of 3,630 people, the largest number in the whole list of those who came back from exile. Why does Scripture bother to count them, and what became of the family whose name closes the list?

A Record God Chose to Keep

Why does a list of names and numbers survive at all? One commentator finds the answer in the fact that it survives:

The very fact that this record exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — however weakly they had entered into His thoughts about His house. That is why He has kept this list. It shows that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows that He knows His people's names and makes them known, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Counted, or Passed Over

This way of counting has a quiet edge to it. A record that names some people also leaves others out:

Except for the last three verses, chapter two gives the numbers of those who answered the proclamation, listed under the heads of their families. It names the heads and counts the families. God took note of these people and put their names into His record. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go He passes over in silence. Let us take note of this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Another writer sets this page beside a second record God keeps:

This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a sample page from the records God keeps. From it we learn that He remembers His people. He knows them by name, and He does not forget their works. In the book of Nehemiah this list is repeated (chapter 7), with an extra record of those who helped build the wall. He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16); and the apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this fact when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for His name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Where This Line Falls in the List

Verse 35 is a boundary marker. It closes the count of ordinary people before the chapter turns to those with temple duties:

Verses 3 to 35 count the people of various cities. Then verses 36 to 39 include the priests among those returning. Verse 40 speaks of the Levites, and verses 41-42 of the singers.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Senaah and the Fish Gate

One reference work links this family to builders met again when Jerusalem's wall was rebuilt:

One whose sons built the fish gate at Jerusalem (Neh. 3:3). Probably the same as Senaah in Neh. 7:38 and Ezra 2:35, with the article added in Neh. 3:3.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

If that link holds, this family later took on one of the most exposed parts of the wall — and finished the job:

After them, the sons of Senaah stand out (Neh. 3:3). Senaah may be a city, or it may be a district in the region of Jericho. They built the fish gate... This gate stood in the northern part of Jerusalem. Like "the gate of the old wall", it was especially open to enemy attack. The Assyrian armies came from the north to surround the city and besiege it. The sons of Senaah saw how important this gate was. They did not stop working until its locks and bars were in place.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why Each Family Had to Be Named

Counting families by descent was not bookkeeping for its own sake. It settled who had a right to build:

So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Descent by birth in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Such jealous care had never been so necessary... only Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

One writer draws the principle out for a day of weakness:

But what I want you to notice is the principle. It was a day of weakness and humiliation, yet it was not to be a day of carelessness. It was to be a day of the greatest care. God's people were to be as watchful for His name then as when everything stood in the full power and beauty of divine order.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted. The list exists because God kept it. He looks with joy on even the smallest fruit of His work in His people's hearts.

- Named. Every household is listed under its family head, because only true Israelites could build God's temple. A day of weakness was still a day for the greatest care.

- Omitted. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence.

- Remembered. This page is a sample of the records God keeps. He knows His people by name and does not forget the love they have shown in serving.

- Used. The family that closes the roll probably built the Fish Gate later, the part of the wall most open to attack. They kept working until its locks and bars were in place.

Ezra 2:36 · Darby

The priests the children of Jedaiah, of the house of Jeshua, nine hundred and seventy-three.

Up to this point the list of returning exiles has counted families and towns. At this verse it turns to those who would serve God's house, and the priests come first. Two questions follow. Why does God count and name them? And what does so short a list say about the state of the priesthood?

Jedaiah, Jeshua, and the Four Courses

This verse opens a very short list of priests. Only a fraction of the old priestly order came home:

The record lists the different temple officials next, and it mentions the priests first. 1 Chronicles 24 lists twenty-four courses. Jedaiah, Immer and Harim appear in the record of Chronicles. In all there were 4,289 priests who went back. And these made up four courses only.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The words "of the house of Jeshua" tie these priests to one of the two men who led the return:

The first return happened around the year 536 BC. Zerubbabel was a descendant of King David. Jeshua was a descendant of Aaron the high priest. These two men led the first Jews home. First they built the altar for burnt offerings in the outer court of the temple, and then the temple itself.

Modernised from Arend RemmersOriginal wording

Why God Kept the Names

A roll of names and figures can look like filler. One writer reads the existence of the list as evidence of how God felt about the people who answered His call:

The record holds several interesting details. The first is that the list exists at all. Its existence shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — however feebly they understood His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed. This encourages all to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Many Priests, Few Levites

Verse 36 begins a block of four priestly families totalling over four thousand. The Levites that follow number seventy-four. That imbalance is a reversal of the earlier history of Israel:

Notice in passing how many the priests were, and how few the Levites. Before the captivity it was the Levites who stood out in comparison. The priests had gained from the recent trial and from God's intervention.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Even so, priests in this list are a hopeful sign. The shortage of Levites is the part that keeps repeating:

It is good to see that there were priests among them (v. 36), and also Levites (v. 40). It is good to see priestly activity coming back among the people, and Levitical service too. But Levites always seem to be in short supply. Here we find just 74 Levites for about 4,000 priests, and we will find an even greater shortage in chapter 8. Very few are willing to do practical work for the benefit of the people of God. But praise the Lord there are some!

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Priests and Levites Today

Another writer carries the ratio over to the church. The priest stands for the worshipper, the Levite for the one who does the practical work:

Don't these facts have something to say to us today? All Christians are priests, and their proper function is to worship God. That is why many of them feel the need to fill their role as worshippers in the assembly of the living God — though it goes without saying that even this number is too few. But the absence of Levites hurts badly. Their functions correspond to the ministries in the Christian assembly. It was not that there was any lack of people, as we shall see in Ezra 8. On their part there was indifference, spiritual laziness, and love of their own comfort, no doubt. So only seventy-four people present themselves to escort the priests, the people, and their leaders!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted — God kept this list because He values the response His grace produced, however small. He records the very names of His people.

- Named — Jedaiah heads one of the twenty-four priestly courses of 1 Chronicles 24. Only four of those courses came back, 4,289 priests in all.

- Led — The house of Jeshua ties these priests to Jeshua, a descendant of Aaron. He led the return with Zerubbabel, who came from David's line.

- Willing — The priests had gained from the recent trial. They now outnumber the Levites, which reverses Israel's earlier history.

- Lopsided — Worshippers come forward more readily than workers. Indifference and love of comfort thinned the Levites, and the pattern still holds.

Ezra 2:37 · Darby

The children of Immer, a thousand and fifty-two.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Ezra 2:38 · Darby

The children of Pashhur, a thousand two hundred and forty-seven.

One line in a long list: the family of Pashhur, 1,247 strong, among the priests who came back from exile in Babylon to Jerusalem. Why does Scripture keep a bare headcount of one priestly family? And what does that number say about God's people at the time?

God's Record of Those Who Returned

The first lesson is that the list exists at all. One commentator sees in it God's delight in a response He Himself produced:

The fact that this record exists shows how precious to God the response of His people was. His grace had produced that response in their hearts, however feebly they grasped His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the very names of His people and makes them known. He does this to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Another writer links the list to a promise that God does not forget what His people do:

It is a sample page of the records God keeps. From it we may learn that He remembers His people. He knows them by name, and He does not forget their works... He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16). The apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for his name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Pashhur Among the Priestly Families

Pashhur sits in a short block of its own. One writer traces the order of the register:

From verse 3 to verse 35 the register counts the people of various cities. Then verses 36 to 39 mention priests among those returning. Verse 40 speaks of Levites, and verses 41-42 of singers.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

That block holds only four families. The priesthood once had twenty-four divisions of service, and only a few of them came home:

In 1 Chronicles 24 twenty-four courses are mentioned. Jedaiah, Immer and Harim are found in the record of Chronicles. In all there were 4,289 priests who went back. And these made up only four courses.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Many Priests, Few Levites

Set beside the seventy-four Levites later in the chapter, Pashhur's 1,247 looks large. One writer sees in that contrast a reversal of what the nation had been before the exile:

Notice in passing how many priests there were, and how few Levites by comparison. Before the captivity the Levites had been the ones who stood out. The priests had profited by the recent trial and by God's intervention.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer brings the same gap into the present day:

Here we find just 74 Levites for about 4,000 priests, and chapter 8 shows an even greater shortage. Those willing to take on practical work for the good of God's people are notoriously few. But praise the Lord there are some!

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

A Number That Could Be Proved

A name in the register mattered. A few verses later, some priests looked for their own entry and could not find it. The ruling against them had a limit:

If any could not show their genealogy, they had no claim to take part in the work of their calling. For the priests the result was even more serious. If they could not find their register, they were treated as polluted and put out of the priesthood. No one told them they were not priests. The ground taken was that their claim was not proven. It might be proven at a future time. When a priest once more stood up with Urim and Thummim — the light and perfection of God, giving him divine intelligence and discernment — he might judge them to be true priests. Meanwhile their claim was forfeited. Grace could restore what was lost under law, but for that they had to wait patiently.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

One writer draws from this a caution for days of weakness, and notes how long the gap has lasted:

A day of weakness demands care not to go beyond our measure... Israel as a natural nation has never had a priest with Urim and Thummim since, least of all when they refused the Lord Jesus. It will not be so always.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted. God takes account of everyone who answered His call. The number 1,247 stands in Scripture as one page from the records He keeps.

- Named. Pashhur's name is in the register. In this chapter, a name you can trace is the difference between serving and being set aside.

- Partial. Four priestly families out of twenty-four returned, 4,289 men in all: a real recovery, but a fraction of what once was.

- Lopsided. About 4,000 priests to 74 Levites: those willing to do the practical work were the fewest of all.

- Awaited. Unsettled cases had to wait for a priest with Urim and Thummim. Grace could restore what law had lost, but only in God's time.

Ezra 2:39 · Darby

The children of Harim, a thousand and seventeen.

This verse ends a short list of four priestly families who went back from Babylon to Jerusalem. One line of numbers raises a real question. Why does God keep a roll of names at all? And what does this list tell us about His people after the exile?

Where the verse sits

The chapter moves in blocks, and this verse belongs to the priestly one. One writer maps the divisions:

From verse 3 to verse 35 the record lists the people of various cities. Then from verse 36 to 39 it mentions priests as part of the number of those returning. Verse 40 speaks of the Levites, and verses 41-42 of the singers.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Harim himself appears only as the head of a family line:

Ancestor of priests who returned from exile. Ezra 2:39; Ezra 10:21. Neh. 7:42.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why the names were written down

A list of families and figures can look like dead weight in Scripture. One commentator argues the opposite — that its very existence is the point:

The fact that this list exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have grasped very little of His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It is also evidence that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed. That encourages all to walk in His ways, to make His interests their own, and to stay faithful in times of corruption.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Four courses out of twenty-four

Harim's name is worth tracing back. An earlier record lists twenty-four priestly groups, called courses. Only a few of them appear here:

The priests come first. In 1 Chronicles 24 we find twenty-four courses. Jedaiah, Immer and Harim appear in the record of Chronicles. In all 4,289 priests went back. And they made up only four courses.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Eager priests, missing Levites

The priests came back in force. The men who did the practical work of God's house did not:

The priests came from four families of the sons of Aaron. They proved eager to take up again their place and work in the house of God that was about to be built. They numbered 4,289 (Ezra 2:36-39). But of the three families of the Levites, only one family was there at all, and even that family came in numbers far too few.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer draws the shortfall out as a pattern rather than a one-off:

It is good to see that there were priests among them (v.36), and also Levites (v.40). It is good to see priestly activity recovered among the people, as well as Levitical service. But Levites always seem to be in short supply. Here we find just 74 Levites for about 4,000 priests, and we will find an even greater shortage in chapter 8. Those willing to do practical work for the good of the people of God are known to be few. But praise the Lord there are some!

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Proof of descent

The sons of Harim are on the roll; a few verses later, other priestly families are not. Their descent could not be traced, and the register decided the matter:

If any could not show their genealogy, they had no claim to take part in the work they had been called to. For the priests the result was even more serious. If they could not find their register, they were treated as unclean and put out of the priesthood. No one told them they were not priests. The ground taken was that their claim was not proven. It might be proven at a future time. So the governor told them not to eat of the most holy things until a priest stood up with Urim and Thummim. When that time came, that priest — once more given divine intelligence and discernment through Urim and Thummim, the light and perfection of God — might judge them to be true priests. Until then their claim was forfeited. Grace could restore what was lost under law, but for this they had to wait patiently.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how hard to press these numbers. On the honesty of the decision itself they agree:

Under the circumstances, the best course of action is to take account of our weakness and not to pretend to have what we do not have (v.63). It must have been hard to refuse those priests, but doing so simply showed that they put God first, not human feelings.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Named. God kept this list because He treasures the response His grace produced. He sees the smallest fruits of His work, and "the very names of His people are known and proclaimed."

- Numbered. Harim's 1,017 form part of 4,289 priests — but only four of the original twenty-four courses came back.

- Proved. Being counted meant showing a register. Families who could not show one had to wait outside priestly service until God settled the matter.

- Unbalanced. About 4,000 priests came back, but only 74 Levites. Worship recovered faster than practical work, and that shortage keeps returning.

- Honest. Refusing to claim what was lost was not weakness but putting God before human feeling.

Ezra 2:40 · Darby

The Levites the children of Jeshua and of Kadmiel, of the children of Hodaviah, seventy-four.

Seventy-four Levites came home from Babylon. Why did so few of the tribe given to the service of God's house return, and what did God do with the handful who did?

Seventy-four out of thousands

The number means little until you set it beside what that tribe once was:

The Levites through grace readily entered on their work. There were only seventy-four. In the wilderness they numbered eight thousand five hundred and eighty, counting only those from thirty to fifty years old. So when the Lord opened the door out of their captivity in Babylon, very few cared to use it. They had found a home, sadly, in the land of their exile. They had forgotten Jerusalem and stopped remembering Zion. The faithfulness of these seventy-four was all the more precious to the Lord. With His presence and blessing they were enough for His service as overseers of the workmen in the house of God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The same writer notes that these seventy-four were not the whole body of Levites:

The children of Asaph, and the children of the gatekeepers (Ezra 2:41-42), were also Levites. Altogether, then, they numbered three hundred and forty-one. But only these seventy-four were available for this special work.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why so few came

Coming back cost a Levite more than it cost anyone else, because his tribe held no land of its own:

Only seventy-four Levites returned. This was a very small number. (Hodaviah should be read Judah; chapter 3:9.) There were more singers than Levites. The children of Asaph, that sweet and blessed singer in Israel, were one hundred and twenty-eight... But why were so few Levites ready to go back? According to the divine instruction in the Law they were to have no inheritance except in the LORD. Returning in these circumstances was a test of faith. That is why many Levites must have stayed in Babylon, where things were plentiful.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Many priests, few Levites

Read against the four priestly houses just listed, verse 40 reverses an older pattern:

Notice in passing how many were the priests, and how few the Levites, in comparison. Before the captivity the Levites had shone by comparison. The priests had profited by the recent trial and God's intervention.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer adds the figures behind the contrast:

The priests came from four families of the sons of Aaron. They proved eager to take up their place and duties again in the house of God that was about to be built. They numbered 4289 (Ezra 2:36-39). Of the three families of the Levites, only one family appeared, and even that family sent a number that was nowhere near enough.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What the shortage says now

One writer applies both roles — priest and Levite — to believers now:

Only the priests could minister at the altar or in the holy places. Still, the Levites had a blessed place of service. They were originally given to Aaron (Christ) for the service of the tabernacle (Num. 3), for all the work of the house of God outside of the priestly office. At the present time believers are both priests and Levites. When they are in the holiest, offering to God the sacrifice of praise through Christ, or when they "do good" and share what they have, they are acting as priests (Heb. 13:15-16). When they are busy for the Lord in other kinds of service, they show the Levitical character.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Rossier sees the same shortage in the present day:

There was no lack of people, as we shall see in Ezra 8. On their part there was indifference, spiritual laziness, and love of their own comfort, no doubt. So only seventy-four people present themselves to escort the priests, the people, and their chiefs! This is certainly one of the marks of the present time just as it was in those days. Some have received gifts from the Lord for evangelising, teaching, and feeding the flock of Christ. They are afraid to go forward with the strength He gives them... Instead of feeling their responsibility, they hand it to others.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Names written down

Small as the company was, God kept their names:

He has caused this list to be preserved. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows that the very names of His people are known and announced, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to keep faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Comfort kept them. The Levites held no inheritance but the LORD, so returning was a test of faith — and Babylon was plentiful.

- Few came. Seventy-four returned. The wilderness count had been 8,580, and of three Levite families only one showed up.

- Reversal. Before the captivity the Levites had shone beside the priests. Now over four thousand priests came back, and the Levites were a handful.

- Enough. With His presence and blessing those seventy-four were enough to oversee the work. Their faithfulness was all the more precious to Him.

- Recorded. God preserved their names. He sees with joy the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work, and their record calls others to the same faithfulness.

Ezra 2:41 · Darby

The singers the children of Asaph, a hundred and twenty-eight.

The list of returning exiles pauses here to count one family of singers. The 128 sons of Asaph stand between the Levites and the gatekeepers. Why does God bother to record a choir by name, and why are there more singers than Levites?

Names God Chose to Keep

One commentator sees the survival of this list as evidence of God's pleasure in a small response.

The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. It shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only weakly into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and announced. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Singers Counted Apart from Levites

The verse lists the singers on their own, but they belonged to the Levites. Adding them back changes the small figure of 74 in the verse before.

The children of Asaph, and the children of the gatekeepers (Ezra 2:41-42), were also Levites. Altogether, then, they numbered 341. But only these 74 were available for this special work.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Song Returning After Babylon

The exiles had come from a place where they could not sing. That background gives the count of singers its weight.

Only seventy-four Levites returned. This was a very small number. There were more singers than Levites. The children of Asaph, that sweet and blessed singer in Israel, were 128. No doubt they encouraged the returning exiles in song, by the spirit of praise and worship. The Babylon experience, so beautifully expressed in Psalm 137, was past. "By the waters of Babylon, there we sat down and wept, when we remembered Zion. On the willows there we hung up our lyres... How shall we sing the LORD's song in a foreign land?" All was changed now. God was working. Deliverance had come, and singing was no doubt heard again among the returning crowds.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Work of a Singer

Another passage says what the singers actually did. David put them over the song in the Lord's house, and their praise points forward.

We can learn what they did from another passage. "These are the men whom David put in charge of the service of song in the house of the LORD after the ark rested there... they performed their service according to their order" (1 Chronicles 6:31-32). The psalmist refers to these when he says, "Blessed are those who dwell in your house, ever singing your praise!" (Psalm 84:4). This was the work of the singers: praising the Lord "day and night" (1 Chronicles 9:33). It is a shadow of the endless work of the redeemed in heaven (Revelation 5). It is a blessed service — if service is the right word — and the Church has the privilege of starting it here on earth while it waits for the return of our blessed Lord.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The next verse names the gatekeepers. One writer sets the two roles side by side:

There were also singers (v. 41), to give praise to God. And there were gatekeepers (v. 42), who would be responsible to keep out everything that would interfere with the Lord's glory.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

When Singers Outnumber Servants

Commentators differ in tone here. One celebrates the recovered song. Another turns the gap between 128 singers and 74 Levites into a question.

The singers, the sons of Asaph, were more numerous than the sons of Levi: the Word mentions 128 of them (Ezra 2:41). What a precious work it is to sing the praises of God! But do we not often see many in the gatherings of the saints taking the role of the "children of Asaph"? They take it to avoid a service that is more demanding and that calls for greater responsibility.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The shortage that shows up beside the singers is treated as a recurring pattern rather than a one-off:

It is good to see that there were priests among them (v. 36), and also Levites (v. 40)... But Levites always seem to be in short supply. Here we find just 74 Levites for about 4,000 priests. Those who are willing to be engaged in practical work for the benefit of the people of God are notoriously few. But praise the Lord there are some!

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Recorded. God kept this list. He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and He knows His people by name.

- Recovered. Singers and gatekeepers were Levites too. Counting them all gives 341, though only 74 were free for that special work.

- Released. The lyres hung up in Babylon are in use again. Deliverance had come, God was working, and song came back with the people.

- Rehearsed. The singers praised God day and night. That is a shadow of what the redeemed will do in heaven, and the Church can begin it now.

- Rebalanced. Few Levites came back, because returning cost them any inheritance but the LORD. And the pleasant role must never be a way of dodging the demanding one.

Ezra 2:42 · Darby

The children of the doorkeepers the children of Shallum, the children of Ater, the children of Talmon, the children of Akkub, the children of Hatita, the children of Shobai, in all a hundred and thirty-nine.

This verse is one line in a long register of families who came back from captivity. It names six households of gatekeepers, 139 men in all, and raises a question: why did guarding a door matter enough for God to record it?

A list God kept

Why do these names survive at all? One writer finds the answer in the fact that the list exists.

He has caused this list to be preserved. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. He knows the very names of His people and makes them known, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to take His interests as their own, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away from God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Gatekeepers among the Levites

The gatekeepers were not a separate tribe of their own. Verses 40 to 42 count them together with the singers and the other Levites.

The children of Asaph, and the children of the gatekeepers (Ezra 2:41-42), were also Levites. Altogether, therefore, they numbered 341.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Older English Bibles call these men "porters," meaning keepers of a door. So what did the charge involve?

The gatekeepers had charge of the gates. Their responsibility was to admit only those who had the proper qualifications to enter the city and approach the house, and to refuse all others.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Two duties at one door

A gate can fail in two ways. It can let in what should stay out, and it can shut out someone with every right to come in.

The doorkeepers had charge of all the gates of the temple. They had to be able to repel any attempt against the house of God. They had to watch with constant energy, so that no defiled person could enter the courts of the Lord. But they also had to keep the doors open, so that they never shut out a priest who had the right to enter the temple.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What the gate protects

Why did the returning company need 139 men at the doors? The answer lies in what they were guarding. The list sets singers and gatekeepers side by side.

There were also singers (v. 41), to give praise to God, and gatekeepers (v. 42) who would be responsible to keep out everything that would interfere with the Lord's glory.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The link between the two is closer than it first appears. Careless work at the gate does not simply admit the wrong people; it empties the house of song.

The singers gave the Lord His portion. Only the redeemed can sing the songs of Zion. So the gatekeepers had to carry out their responsibilities faithfully, if the Lord was to have His portion. To let in those without divine qualifications is to admit those who cannot sing. Worship is lost where the gatekeepers are lax. When an assembly of God's people today loses its worship, that usually goes together with letting people in carelessly.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The same work now

Commentators read this office as a picture of a responsibility Christians still carry.

They held a most important post, and so do the gatekeepers of today. Every believer — every member of the body of Christ — has his place, for example, at the Lord's supper. That is true, and we must always insist on it. Even so, the "gatekeepers" of the assembly have the responsibility of asking for proof that people are what they claim to be. Slackness or neglect here has produced the most serious consequences in many an assembly. In some cases it has destroyed all testimony for Christ and brought open dishonour on His blessed name. So it matters greatly that only faithful and trusted men should do the work of "gatekeepers," especially in a day of common profession, when everyone alike claims to be a Christian.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

So who appoints such men today? Another writer answers that no one does.

In the Church of God today we surely need such gatekeepers, but the Church has no authority to appoint them. Instead, since the Spirit of God dwells in the Church, He will move godly men to do this necessary work willingly, with no need of appointment. They have the Word of God to guide them in it, for the Spirit of God always works by means of that Word.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Named. God kept six gatekeeper families on record by name. He sees with joy the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work.

- Guard. Their office was to admit those qualified to come near the house, and to refuse all others.

- Open. The same watchfulness had to keep the doors open. No priest with a right to enter could be turned away.

- Worship. Guarding the gate protects the singing. Hold it loosely, and praise is the first thing to go.

- Today. The Church cannot appoint gatekeepers, yet the Spirit of God still moves godly men to the work, with the Word to guide them.

Ezra 2:43 · Darby

The Nethinim the children of Ziha, the children of Hasupha, the children of Tabbaoth,

After the priests, Levites and singers, the list of returning exiles turns to the temple servants, or Nethinim, named family by family down to verse 54. Who were they, and why does God record the names of those doing the humblest work in His house?

The Name and the Office

Their name is itself a description.

The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chron. 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order originated with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites. Joshua appointed them as helpers to the Levites (Josh. 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God, with set duties in the temple.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

They stood one step below the Levites: "Their function was entirely to serve the Levites; they worked for the Levites." (George Davison)

Where They Came From

Their place in the list has led writers to conclude they were not Israelites by birth.

The word seems to mean "those that are given." Because of where their names come in the chapter (see also 1 Chr. 9:2), writers have concluded that they came from another race. They had been given at first to the Levites, to serve them. In the same way the Levites had been given to Aaron for the Lord's service in His tabernacle — only the Levites were given by God's command, and in the place of the firstborn of Israel (see Num. 8).

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Commentators treat the Gibeonite link as likely, not proven. They also differ over who set them apart: "It does not appear that God appointed them, as He did the Levites, but 'David and the princes' appointed them 'for the service of the Levites.'" (Morrish Bible Dictionary)

A Curse Turned Into Blessing

If the Gibeonites were their ancestors, these families carried the memory of a sentence of slavery.

So here we probably find the origin of the Nethinim. God spared them from the judgment they deserved. If He put them into slavery, it was slavery in His mercy, and it tied them to His house. The very curse that rested on them (see Joshua 9:23) was turned into a blessing. What do we find? The sword of the Lord's army did not destroy them. They were rescued. Centuries later they stand in honourable company with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment. So they are no small picture of the objects of grace, even in the present age.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Outsiders Whose Loyalty Shone

These families were not Israelites, and they had been away from Judah for a lifetime.

We never read of any of them refusing this place of submission to Israel. Their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable loyalty to the God of Israel. They were Gentiles, and they had been away from Judah for 70 years. After such a long absence, not all the Jews were ready to return to their own country. So the faith of these Gentiles who had joined them shines out all the brighter.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Later, when Ezra gathered a second company, these servants far outnumbered the Levites: "There are 220 Nethinim, or about six servants for each Levite!" (H. L. Rossier)

Small Work, Written Down

The tasks behind these names were small ones.

These modest tasks are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly records all the names of their fathers. It is the same today, whether it is serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, or taking care of the "upper room". The Lord forgets none of it. He writes down the names of those who have kept charge of this service, and they deserve it just as much as any others.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

God's notice of the overlooked did not end with Ezra's list.

And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim (v.43) and Solomon's servants (v.55). These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they were occupied with lowly service. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. In the same way, members of the body of Christ have different tasks, duties, and abilities. The most prominent ones may not be the most important ones (1 Cor. 12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Given. The name means "given" or "devoted" — men handed to God for service in His house, as the Levites were given to Aaron.

- Spared. Writers link them, with care, to the Gibeonites. They escaped judgment and received servitude instead of the sword.

- Turned. God turned the curse on them into a blessing. Centuries later they stand in honourable company with His people — a picture of grace.

- Devoted. Outsiders by birth, they returned when many Israelites would not. Later they outnumbered the Levites six to one in answering Ezra's call.

- Remembered. God writes their modest work down family by family. The least visible service in His house is never the least valued.

Ezra 2:44 · Darby

the children of Keros, the children of Siaha, the children of Padon,

Keros, Siaha and Padon appear here among the Nethinim, the temple servants who returned from exile in Babylon. Their names mean nothing to us today, so why does God record them, and who were these men?

The Meaning of "Nethinim"

This group carries its own title in the list. The title tells us what they were for.

The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, given to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chron. 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order originated with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites, whom Joshua appointed as helpers to the Levites (Josh. 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God assigned to certain duties in the temple.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Outsiders Given for Service

Were these men Israelites at all? Their names sit after the Israelites in the chapter, and that placing shapes the answer.

Two other classes follow the Israelites in this list: the Nethinim, and the servants of Solomon. Were these of Jewish descent? The word seems to mean "those that are given." Because of where their names come in the chapter, the conclusion has been that they were of another race, but had first been given to the Levites for their service. The Levites too had been given to Aaron for the Lord's service in His tabernacle — only they were given by God's command, and in the place of the firstborn of Israel.

after_note: none

Edward Dennett

A Curse Turned into Blessing

If these families came from Gibeon, their low place as servants became the very thing that spared them.

Here, then, we probably find where the Nethinim came from — people spared from the just judgment of God. If they were reduced to slavery, it was slavery in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse resting on them turned into a blessing. For what do we find? Instead of dying by the sword of the Lord's army, they were rescued. Centuries later they stand in honoured company with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of those who receive grace even in this age.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Their Loyalty Compared with Israel's

The journey home was long and costly. Notice, then, who chose to make it.

We do not read of any of them refusing this place of submission to Israel, and their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable loyalty to the God of Israel, since they were Gentiles and had been away from Judah for 70 years. After so long an absence, not all of the Jews were prepared to return to their own country, so that the faith of their Gentile adherents shines out the more brightly.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why God Writes Down Such Names

A verse of three forgotten names looks like filler. Its survival says something about what God values.

This record exists at all, and that shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — however weakly they may have grasped His thoughts about His house. For that reason He has kept this list, as evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. He knows the very names of His people and announces them, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The ones easiest to overlook are named too.

And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim (v.43) and Solomon's servants (v.55). These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they were occupied with lowly service. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. Similarly, in the body of Christ, members have different tasks, duties, and abilities, and the most prominent ones may not be the most important ones (1 Cor. 12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Given. Nethinim means "given" or "devoted" — men set apart for duties at God's house. Scripture names them in only one other place.

- Given from outside. Their place in the list, after the Israelites, led commentators to conclude they came from another race and were given to the Levites for service. The link to Gibeon is probable, not proven.

- Given instead of judged. If they came from Gibeon, their sentence of servitude spared them from destruction. The curse on them turned into blessing.

- Giving themselves back. Centuries later they chose the journey home while many Jews stayed behind. The faith of these outsiders shines the brighter.

- Given a name in the record. God kept their family names. He notices the smallest fruit of His work, and the least prominent servants are not the least important.

Ezra 2:45 · Darby

the children of Lebanah, the children of Hagabah, the children of Akkub,

Lebanah, Hagabah and Akkub belong to a long list of Nethinim — the temple servants who came home from exile with the first group of returning Jews. Why does Scripture keep the family names of men who only carried wood and water for God's house?

Who the Nethinim Were

One commentator traces the name of this group and its likely origin:

The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, given to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chronicles 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order started with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites. Joshua appointed them as helpers to the Levites (Joshua 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God assigned to certain duties in the temple.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how certain that link is. Some call it probable rather than proven. All agree on the work itself: these men served as helpers under the Levites.

A Curse Turned Into Blessing

If the Gibeonites are in view, these men descend from a people Joshua sentenced to lasting servitude. One commentator reads their place in the list as mercy:

It is here, then, that we probably find the origin of the Nethinim — those who were spared from the just judgment of God. If they were reduced to slavery, it was slavery in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse resting on them (see Joshua 9:23) turned into a blessing. For what do we find? They were not destroyed by the sword of the Lord's host. They were rescued. And now, centuries later, we find them in honourable company with the Lord's people. They had a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow-captives at this special moment. They are surely no small foreshadowing of those who receive grace even in this present age.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The same writer widens the lesson:

The lesson already drawn is again significant, that the least connection with the Lord's people and the Lord's things becomes a means of blessing — not always spiritual blessing, though almost always blessing in this life.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Names God Takes Care to Write Down

Nothing here looks impressive: three family names, no deeds, no speeches. One commentator counts these servants, then carries the point into our own day:

The gatekeepers numbered 139. The Nethinim, the lower servants of the sanctuary, together with Solomon's servants, numbered 392 (v. 58). These modest functions are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly registers all the names of their fathers. In the same way today, the Lord forgets none of it: serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, taking care of the upper room. He registers the names of those who have kept this service just as deservedly as the others. And we shall see, more than once, that the child of God who took the last place, forgetting himself to serve others, will hold a place of honour. Meanwhile a striking gift that tended to glorify man instead of Christ will sit down in shame in the last place.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Outsiders Whose Faith Shone Brightest

These servants were not Israelites by birth, and seventy years had passed since the exile began. Yet their names stand in the list:

We do not read of any of them refusing this place of submission to Israel. Their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable loyalty to the God of Israel. They were Gentiles, and they had been away from Judah for 70 years. After so long an absence, not all of the Jews wanted to return to their own country. So the faith of these Gentiles who had joined them shines out the more brightly.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Given. "Nethinim" means given, or devoted. These men were handed over to God's service as helpers under the Levites.

- Given mercy. They likely came from a people under a sentence of servitude. The bondage turned into mercy, because it tied them to God's house.

- Given a name. God writes down the families of His lowest servants. No small task in His house goes unnoticed by Him.

- Given a heart. They left Babylon when many Israelites by birth would not. The faith of these outsiders shines out the brighter.

- Given as a picture. Rescued outsiders now stand in honourable company with God's people — a foreshadowing of how grace still works.

Ezra 2:46 · Darby

the children of Hagab, the children of Shamlai, the children of Hanan,

This verse sits inside a long list of families who came home from exile in Babylon. These three names are not priests or princes but Nethinim, the lowest workers at God's house — so why does God bother to write them down?

Who the Nethinim Were

The name itself is the first clue. Commentators trace it to a group from outside Israel.

The word seems to mean "those that are given." From the place where their names occur in the chapter, some have concluded that they were of another race, but had been given originally to the Levites for their service. The Levites themselves had been given to Aaron for the Lord's service in His tabernacle — only these by divine command, and in the place of the firstborn of Israel. Traces of such are found in two Scriptures... We also find Joshua saying to the Gibeonites, "some of you shall always be slaves, cutters of wood and drawers of water for the house of my God."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Gibeonites were a local people Joshua spared. Their work for God's house was lifelong. That origin is only probable, and another writer points to a later appointment:

Ezra 8:20 tells us that David appointed the Nethinim to serve the Levites. They were probably Gibeonites whom Joshua had received.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Curse Turned into Blessing

If these families do descend from Gibeon, their history took a surprising turn.

Here, then, we probably find the origin of the Nethinim: God spared them from His just judgment. If they were reduced to slavery, it was slavery in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse resting on them turned into a blessing. For what do we find? The sword of the Lord's host did not destroy them; they were rescued. Now, centuries later, we find them in honourable company with the Lord's people. They had a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in the present age.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why the Names Are Written Down

The list does not stop at a headcount. It goes family by family.

The Nethinim, or subordinate servants of the sanctuary, together with Solomon's servants, numbered 392. These modest functions are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly registers all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. Whether it is serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, or taking care of the "upper room," the Lord forgets none of it. He registers the names of those who have kept the charge of this service just as deservedly as others. And we will see, in more than one case, that the child of God who took the last place, forgetting himself in order to serve others, will be given a place of honour — while a remarkable gift that tended to glorify man rather than Christ will sit down in shame in the last place.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer carries the same thought into the church today.

And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim and Solomon's servants. These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they were occupied with lowly service. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. In the same way, members of the body of Christ have different tasks, duties, and abilities. The most prominent ones may not be the most important ones (1 Cor. 12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Outsiders Who Became Insiders

The story does not end with the register. Later these families stand with Israel under a binding oath of their own. Writers name their stock differently — Gibeonites, or Amorites — but agree they were outsiders by birth.

When the people gathered in solemn assembly, their leaders sealed the covenant. The Nethinim entered into a curse and an oath to walk in God's law, and not to intermarry with the peoples of the land. They were in fact descendants of the Amorites, yet they were now thoroughly part of the nation of Israel. With the faithful in Israel, these men of faith were blessed.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Given. Nethinim means "those that are given" — outsiders handed to the Levites for service, as the Levites had been given to Aaron.

- Spared. They escaped judgment. Their sentence to lowly labour placed them near God's house, so the curse turned into blessing.

- Willing. Centuries later they left Babylon with their fellow captives, and they had a heart for God's house.

- Named. God gladly writes down every family of these lowest servants. The one who takes the last place will be given a place of honour.

- Counted in. In the end they take the same oath as Israel's leaders: outsiders by birth, now fully part of Israel, blessed with the faithful.

Ezra 2:47 · Darby

the children of Giddel, the children of Gahar, the children of Reaiah,

These three family names belong to the Nethinim. They were temple servants, and they are listed among the thousands who returned from Babylon to rebuild God's house. Two questions follow. Who were these people, and why does Scripture keep a record like this?

Why God Keeps Obscure Names

The list exists because God valued the response His grace had produced, even in people whose grasp of His purposes was small.

On this account He has caused this list to be preserved, in evidence that He beholds with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed as an encouragement to all to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to maintain fidelity in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Meaning Of "Nethinim"

These three families stand under one label: Nethinim. The word itself tells you their place.

The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chronicles 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order originated with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites, whom Joshua appointed as helpers to the Levites (Joshua 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God assigned to certain duties in the temple.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Curse Turned Into A Blessing

If these families were Gibeonites, their servitude began as a sentence. Yet the outcome is striking.

It is here, therefore, that we probably find the origin of the Nethinim — those who were spared from the just judgment of God; and if reduced to servile bondage, it was bondage in His mercy in connection with His house, so that the very curse that rested on them (see Joshua 9:23) was turned into a blessing. For what do we find? That instead of being destroyed with the sword of the Lord's host, they were rescued, and now, after the passing of centuries, they are found in honourable association with the Lord's people, and with a heart too for the Lord's house, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow-captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in this age.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Outsiders Whose Faith Outshone Israel's

Their willingness to travel is more remarkable than it first appears, because they had no ancestral claim to the land they were going to.

We have noted that the Nethinim were likely Gibeonites who had entered the congregation in the time of Joshua, who told them, "There shall none of you be freed from being bondmen, and hewers of wood and drawers of water for the house of my God" (Joshua 9:23). We do not read of any of them refusing this place of submission to Israel, and their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable loyalty to the God of Israel, since they were Gentiles and had been away from Judah for 70 years. After such a long absence, not all of the Jews were prepared to return to their own country, so the faith of their Gentile adherents shines out all the more brightly.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God Counts Lowly Service

Most readers skim past names like these. God does not, and the same point reaches into the church today.

And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim (v. 43) and Solomon's servants (v. 55). These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they were occupied with lowly service. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. In the same way, members of the body of Christ have different tasks, duties, and abilities. The most prominent ones may not be the most important ones (1 Corinthians 12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Their standing among the people was no longer marginal. Later, when the nation bound itself by covenant, these servants signed on with everyone else.

When gathered in solemn assembly, the covenant was sealed by the leaders of the people, and the Nethinim entered into a curse and an oath to walk in God's law and not to intermarry with the peoples of the land! For though they were actually descendants of the Amorites, they were now thoroughly incorporated with the nation of Israel. With the faithful in Israel, these men of faith were blessed.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Given. "Nethinim" means those who are given or devoted — a title of service to God, not a family line.

- Spared. If they came from the Gibeonites, God spared them instead of destroying them. Their slavery was mercy, and the curse became a blessing.

- Named. God kept this record. He looks with joy on the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work, and He makes His people's names known.

- Willing. These Gentiles had been away from Judah for 70 years, yet they returned. Not all the Jews were ready to go. Their faith shines the brighter.

- Counted. God names lowly servants, and they later sealed the covenant with the nation. In the body of Christ too, the most prominent members may not be the most important.

Ezra 2:48 · Darby

the children of Rezin, the children of Nekoda, the children of Gazzam,

The verse sits deep inside a long list of families who came back from exile in Babylon. It falls in the section naming the Nethinim — the temple servants. The verse adds three more family names. Why would God keep a written record of servants nobody else would remember?

Where the Verse Stands in the List

The chapter falls into groups, and this verse belongs to the last and lowest of them. One commentator traces the order:

Verses 3 to 35 list the people of various cities. Verses 36 to 39 mention priests among those returning. Verse 40 then speaks of Levites, and verses 41-42 of singers. Verse 43 introduces the Nethinim.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Meaning of "Nethinim"

The name itself explains their place:

The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chron. 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order originated with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites, whom Joshua appointed as helpers to the Levites (Josh. 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God assigned to certain duties in the temple.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Commentators differ: some call the Gibeonite link probable, while Gaebelein leaves the origin open.

A Sentence Turned Into Mercy

If these families did descend from the Gibeonites, then their servant status began as a judgment. The Gibeonites were the people Joshua spared instead of destroying, and he appointed them as helpers to the Levites. One writer draws out the result:

It is here, then, that we probably find the origin of the Nethinim — those who were spared from the just judgment of God. If they were reduced to the bondage of servants, it was bondage in His mercy, in connection with His house. So the very curse resting on them (see Joshua 9:23) was turned into a blessing. For what do we find? Instead of being destroyed by the sword of the Lord's host, they were rescued. Now, hundreds of years later, they stand in honourable association with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house as well, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow-captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in this present age.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why Such a List Exists at All

A register of obscure names looks like filler until you ask who wanted it kept. The same writer answers:

The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. It shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only feebly into His thoughts about His house. Even so, He has caused this list to be preserved. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows too that the very names of His people are known and announced, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Low Work, Named Workers

The Nethinim did the background jobs of the sanctuary, and their families are listed one by one anyway:

The porters numbered 139. The Nethinim, or lower servants of the sanctuary, together with Solomon's servants, numbered 392 (v. 58). These modest tasks are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly registers all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. Serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, taking care of the "upper room" — the Lord forgets none of it. He records the names of those who have kept the charge of this service just as deservedly as any others. We will see, in more than one case, that the one among the children of God who took the last place, forgetting himself in order to serve others, will occupy a place of honour. Meanwhile a certain remarkable gift, which tended to glorify man rather than Christ, will sit down in shame in the last place.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Servants Who Kept Coming

The same class appears again later. When Ezra summoned helpers, few Levites answered:

There were still fewer than forty Levites, while there were two hundred and twenty Nethinim. Here is another proof. In the comfortable ease of Babylon, the nation's hopes and privileges no longer had any practical power over their minds. Set that against the laziness of the Levites. It is beautiful to notice how many Nethinim (probably of a foreign race) obeyed Ezra's summons.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Given. The word Nethinim means "given" or "devoted" — to God. Their name says they were handed over for the service of His house.

- Given mercy. If they came from the Gibeonites, their servant status started as a sentence; God turned the curse into bondage "in His mercy in connection with His house."

- Given names. Rezin, Nekoda and Gazzam are not decoration. The list exists because God "looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work."

- Given tasks. Serving tables, passing the bread and cup, caring for the room: modest work is "very valuable in the eyes of the Lord." He records it just as deservedly as any other.

- Given hearts. Later, 220 Nethinim answered Ezra's call while the Levites stayed comfortable. The lowest class in the register proved the most willing to go.

Ezra 2:49 · Darby

the children of Uzza, the children of Phaseah, the children of Besai,

Ezra 2:49 names three families among the Nethinim — the temple servants who came home from exile in Babylon. Why would God keep a written record of servants we know nothing else about?

Place in the Register

The chapter sorts its names into groups. Verse 49 falls after the families of Israel's own tribes:

Looking at this catalogue a little more closely, we find a fourfold division. Down to the end of verse 42 we have those who were clearly of Israel — of Judah, Benjamin, or of Levi (among the last both singers and gatekeepers). Then come two other classes: the Nethinim, and the servants of Solomon. A few words about them will be necessary.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Of the three families here, Scripture tells us little more than that they were there. A reference work sums up one of them in a single line:

Ancestor of some Nethinim, who returned from exile.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Meaning of "Nethinim"

The name of the group says what these people were:

The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chron. 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order originated with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites. Joshua appointed them as helpers to the Levites (Josh. 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God with set duties in the temple.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Commentators differ on where they came from. Some call the Gibeonite link likely rather than proven, and one writer traces them to the Amorites.

From Curse to Blessing

If these families came from Gibeon, the list is a record of mercy:

This is probably where we find the origin of the Nethinim — those whom God spared from His just judgment. If they were brought into slavery, it was slavery in His mercy, connected with His house. So the very curse resting on them (see Joshua 9:23) turned into a blessing. For what do we find? The sword of the Lord's host did not destroy them. They were rescued. Now, centuries later, they stand in honourable association with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow-captives at this special moment. They are surely no small foreshadowing of the objects of grace even in this age.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Faith of Outsiders

Their willingness to return stands out against the Jews who stayed:

The Nethinim were likely Gibeonites who had joined the congregation in Joshua's time. He told them, "None of you shall be freed from being servants, cutters of wood and drawers of water for the house of my God" (Josh. 9:23, older translation). We do not read of any of them refusing this place of submission to Israel. Their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable loyalty to the God of Israel, since they were Gentiles who had been away from Judah for 70 years. After so long an absence, not all of the Jews were ready to return to their own country. So the faith of these Gentile followers shines out all the brighter.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Their story does not stop at the list. They took on the covenant with the rest of the nation:

The people gathered in solemn assembly, and their leaders sealed the covenant. The Nethinim joined in a curse and an oath to walk in God's law, and not to intermarry with the peoples of the land! They were in fact descendants of the Amorites, yet they were now fully part of the nation of Israel. With the faithful in Israel, these men of faith were blessed.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why the Names Are Written

The existence of the register is itself the message:

The first thing to notice is that the very existence of this record shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. That is true however weakly they entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows and proclaims the very names of His people. All this encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — "Nethinim" means given, or devoted to God; these families served in the temple.

- Spared — if they came from Gibeon, their slavery began as mercy, and the curse on them turned into blessing.

- Loyal — Scripture never records one of them refusing that place of service.

- Grafted — Gentiles, 70 years away, chose the road home, and later sealed the covenant with Israel.

- Counted — God kept the list, because He sees the smallest fruit of His work and makes His people's names known.

Ezra 2:50 · Darby

the children of Asnah, the children of Meunim, the children of Nephusim,

Three family names — Asnah, Meunim, Nephisim — sit inside a long list of temple servants who returned from Babylon to Jerusalem. The list raises two questions: who were these servants, and why does God write down names like these?

Who the Nethinim Were

These three families belong to the group called the Nethinim. The name itself carries the explanation.

The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chron. 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order started with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites, whom Joshua appointed as helpers to the Levites (Josh. 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God with set duties in the temple.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. Some treat the Gibeonite link as likely. Others say only that these families were probably not of Jewish descent.

A Curse Turned Into Blessing

If the Gibeonite origin is right, these families began in bondage. Notice what God did with it.

Here, then, we probably find the origin of the Nethinim. They were spared from the just judgment of God. If they were reduced to servile bondage, it was bondage in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse resting on them (see Joshua 9:23) became a blessing. For what do we find? Instead of being destroyed by the sword of the Lord's host, they were rescued. Centuries later they stand in honourable company with the Lord's people. They had a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment. They are no small picture of the objects of grace even in this present age.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why the Names Are Written Down

Their duties were small and out of sight. The verse still records their family names.

The Nethinim, the lower servants of the sanctuary, together with Solomon's servants numbered 392 (v. 58). These modest functions are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly registers all the names of their fathers. In the same way today, whether it is a matter of serving tables, of passing the bread and the cup, or of caring for the "upper room," the Lord forgets none of it. He records the names of those who have kept the charge of this service just as rightly as the others. And we shall see, in more than one case, that the child of God who took the last place, forgetting himself to serve others, will hold a place of honour. Meanwhile a certain remarkable gift, which tended to glorify man rather than Christ, will sit down in shame in the last place.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

God kept this record on purpose.

He has kept this list on record as evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. He knows and announces the very names of His people. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to identify with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Every Part Counted

The list runs from leaders and priests down to these families. The last group is not the least.

And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim (v.43) and Solomon's servants (v.55). These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they did lowly work. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. In the same way, members of the body of Christ have different tasks, duties, and abilities. The most prominent ones may not be the most important ones (1 Cor. 12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Willingness Where It Was Least Expected

The Nethinim appear again later in the book. When Ezra called for helpers, the numbers told their own story.

There were still fewer than forty Levites, while there were two hundred and twenty Nethinim. It is another proof that in the easy comfort of Babylon, the nation's hopes and privileges had lost all real power over their minds. Set against the laziness of the Levites, the number of Nethinim who obeyed Ezra's summons is beautiful to notice. They were probably of a foreign race.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Given. "Nethinim" means given or devoted. They were servants set apart for temple duties, an order that began with David.

- Spared. They most likely began in bondage under a curse. God's mercy turned that curse into a place near His house.

- Named. God records these unknown families as fully as the leaders. The smallest fruit of His Spirit's work gives Him joy.

- Willing. They left the comfort of Babylon. Later they answered Ezra's call in far greater numbers than the Levites.

- Rewarded. The one who takes the last place to serve others will hold a place of honour. Prominence and importance are not the same.

Ezra 2:51 · Darby

the children of Bakbuk, the children of Hakupha, the children of Harhur,

This verse sits in a long list of names that most readers skim: three families of Nethinim, the temple helpers, among those who left Babylon for Jerusalem. Why did God keep such obscure names, and who were these people?

Who the Nethinim Were

The word behind the name explains the group. It marks people given over to service at God's house. Writers also trace their likely origin back to the Gibeonites:

A name meaning "given, devoted ones," applied to those who helped the Levites in the service of the tabernacle and the temple. The Gibeonites were made "cutters of wood and drawers of water for the congregation and for the altar." Joshua 9:27. These are not mentioned after 2 Samuel, so they and their descendants may have been the Nethinim. It does not appear that God appointed them, as He did the Levites, but "David and the princes" appointed them "for the service of the Levites." Ezra 8:20. After the return from exile the Nethinim are called the "ministers of this house of God."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Commentators treat this Gibeonite link as likely, not proven.

A Curse Turned Into Blessing

If these families did descend from Gibeon, then their low rank was itself mercy:

It is here, then, that we probably find the origin of the Nethinim — those who were spared from the just judgment of God. If they were reduced to servile bondage, it was bondage in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse resting on them became a blessing. For what do we find? Instead of being destroyed with the sword of the Lord's host, they were rescued. Now, centuries later, we find them in honourable company with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow-captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in the present age.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Faith That Outshone Israel's

Seventy years away from the land — yet the families of Bakbuk, Hakupha and Harhur went back. Many Jews would not, and that makes their choice stand out:

We do not read of any of them refusing this place of submission to Israel. Their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable allegiance to the God of Israel, since they were Gentiles and had been away from Judah for 70 years. After so long an absence, not all of the Jews were ready to return to their own country. So the faith of their Gentile followers shines out all the brighter.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the Names Are Written Down

Why keep such a list at all? Its very existence is the answer:

The first thing to notice is that this list exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people, however weakly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It proves that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the very names of His people and proclaims them. That is an encouragement to all to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to keep faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Small Service, Registered by Name

The verse says nothing about these families except that they came. Small tasks like theirs still matter:

These modest functions are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly records all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. Serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, taking care of the "upper room" — the Lord forgets none of it. He records the names of those who have kept charge of this service, and they deserve it as much as any others. In more than one case we shall see that the one among God's children who took the last place, forgetting himself to serve others, will hold a place of honour.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer sees in such details how little we know of God's care:

Even their animals are counted. How ignorant man is of God! How good for His people! From His word they can learn of His interest in themselves and in everything that belongs to them. Their estate may be low, yet His notice of them is all the more striking.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — "Nethinim" means given or devoted ones. They helped the Levites. David and the princes appointed them, not God directly, as far as the record shows.

- Spared — they likely came from Gibeon. God spared them from judgment and gave them a servant's place near His house, so the curse became a blessing.

- Returned — Gentiles by birth, and away from Judah for seventy years, they still went up. Many Jews stayed behind.

- Recorded — God kept this list because He rejoices over the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. He knows His people by name.

- Rewarded — quiet service still counts today. The Lord records it, and the one who took the last place will hold a place of honour.

Ezra 2:52 · Darby

the children of Bazluth, the children of Mehida, the children of Harsha,

This verse sits in a list of temple servants — the group older translations call the Nethinim. They came back from exile in Babylon with the priests and Levites. It names three households and says nothing else about them. So why does God write down the names of people who did the lowest work?

Who the Temple Servants Were

A reference work gathers what their name means and what they did:

The name means "given, devoted ones," and it belongs to those who helped the Levites serve in the tabernacle and the temple. The name does not occur until 1 Chronicles 9:2, and afterwards in Ezra and Nehemiah. The Gibeonites were made "cutters of wood and drawers of water for the congregation and for the altar" (Joshua 9:27). No book after 2 Samuel mentions them, so they and their descendants may have been the Nethinim. God does not appear to have appointed them, as He did the Levites. Instead "David and the princes" appointed them "for the service of the Levites" (Ezra 8:20). After the return from exile the Nethinim bear the title "ministers of this house of God." Like the priests and Levites, they paid no "toll, tribute, or custom" (Ezra 7:24).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Writers treat the link with the Gibeonites — the woodcutters and water-carriers of Joshua 9 — as likely, not certain.

Curse Turned Into Blessing

If that origin is right, then the ancestors of Bazluth, Mehida and Harsha were people who should have been destroyed. One writer traces what mercy did with them instead:

So this is probably where the Nethinim began. God spared them from His just judgment. If they were brought into slave-like bondage, it was bondage in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse that rested on them (see Joshua 9:23) turned into a blessing. For what do we find? The sword of the Lord's army did not destroy them. They were rescued. Now, centuries later, we find them in honourable association with the Lord's people. They had a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow-captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in this age.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why God Wrote the Names Down

A list of unfamiliar names looks like filler. The same writer asks why God kept it:

The first thing to notice is the list itself. Its existence shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — however feebly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list safe. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and announced. That encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to keep faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Servants of the Servants

The Levites already held a supporting role in the temple. These families supported the supporters:

In Ezra 8:20 we read, "Also of the Nethinim, whom David and the princes had appointed for the service of the Levites." Today they would perhaps match those who do many services behind the scenes, as we may say. Many things are necessary and have to be done week by week. People often take them for granted, but someone has to do them.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

The Last Place and the Place of Honour

What is such modest service worth to the Lord, and where does it end?

The Nethinim, the subordinate servants of the sanctuary, together with Solomon's servants, numbered 392 (v. 58). These modest functions are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly registers all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. Whether it is serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, or taking care of the "upper room," the Lord forgets none of it. He registers the names of those who have kept charge of this service just as deservedly as the others. And we shall see, in more than one case, that the child of God who took the last place, forgetting himself to serve others, will hold a place of honour. Meanwhile a certain remarkable gift, which tended to glorify man rather than Christ, will sit down in confusion in the last place.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Given. Their name means "given, devoted ones." They helped the Levites, and later Scripture calls them the ministers of God's house.

- Spared. Their likely ancestors faced destruction. Mercy put them in bondage near God's house, and the curse became a blessing.

- Named. Centuries later their descendants return. God records the families, because He values even the smallest fruit of His work in a heart.

- Hidden. They served those who served. The weekly work gets taken for granted, but someone must do it.

- Honoured. God registers the one who takes the last place and forgets himself in serving others. That servant will hold a place of honour.

Ezra 2:53 · Darby

the children of Barkos, the children of Sisera, the children of Thamah,

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Ezra 2:54 · Darby

the children of Neziah, the children of Hatipha.

Neziah and Hatipha are two more family names in a long roll-call of the Nethinim — the temple servants who returned from exile with the remnant. Names like these are easy to skip. Yet God kept them on record, and commentators read in them both a question of origin and a lesson in grace.

The Name "Nethinim"

The name itself tells you what these families were:

Name, meaning "given, devoted ones," applied to those who assisted the Levites in the service of the tabernacle and the temple. The Gibeonites were made cutters of wood and drawers of water (Joshua 9:27). They are not mentioned after 2 Samuel, so they and their descendants may have been the Nethinim. It does not appear that God appointed them, as He did the Levites, but "David and the princes" appointed them "for the service of the Levites." Ezra 8:20… After the return from exile they are called "servants of this house of God." Like the priests and Levites, they paid no "tribute, custom, or toll." Ezra 7:24. Ezra 2:43-54 lists them.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Where They Came From

One writer finds the origin of the Nethinim in that sentence of servitude:

This is probably where the Nethinim began. They were spared from the just judgment of God. If they were reduced to slavery, it was slavery in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse that rested on them (see Joshua 9:23) turned into a blessing. For what do we find? The sword of the Lord's host did not destroy them. They were rescued. Centuries later they stand in honourable association with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow-captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in this present time.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Outsiders With Real Faith

Their willingness to leave Babylon stands out against the Jews who stayed:

We do not read of any of them refusing this place of submission to Israel. Their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable allegiance to the God of Israel. They were Gentiles, and they had been away from Judah for 70 years. After so long an absence, not all of the Jews were ready to return to their own country. So the faith of these Gentile followers shines out all the more brightly.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The same contrast appears later, when Ezra gathered a second group:

There were still fewer than forty Levites, while there were two hundred and twenty Nethinim. The comfortable ease of Babylon had drained the nation's hopes and privileges of any practical power over their minds. Next to the laziness of the Levites, it is beautiful to see how many Nethinim (probably of a foreign race) obeyed Ezra's summons.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Fully Counted Among God's People

Commentators name their ancestors differently, yet by the sealed covenant no distance remained between these families and Israel:

One more fact is even more remarkable than the very long list of the Nethinim who returned with Zerubbabel, given in both Ezra and Nehemiah. The people gathered in solemn assembly, and their leaders sealed the covenant. The Nethinim bound themselves with a curse and an oath to walk in God's law, and not to intermarry with the peoples of the land! They really were descendants of the Amorites, yet they were now thoroughly joined to the nation of Israel. With the faithful in Israel, these men of faith were blessed.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why the Names Were Kept

The existence of the register is itself the point:

The very existence of this list shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only weakly into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list on record. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. He knows the very names of His people and proclaims them, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Hidden Service

Their place was support, not leadership, and one writer finds encouragement in that:

It is remarkable that the Nethinim were the ones keeping the source of refreshment for the people of God. That should encourage all those who may not be able to take on any prominent service. Many a simple service can be used to set the affections of the saints free, and so enrich the service of God.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Summary

- Given. "Nethinim" means the given, devoted ones. David and the princes, not a direct command of God, put them at the temple to help the Levites.

- Spared. Their likely ancestors were Gibeonites, sentenced to servitude. The curse became mercy, because that service tied them to God's house.

- Willing. Outsiders by birth, they left Babylon when many Israelites would not. Later 220 of them answered Ezra's call, against fewer than 40 Levites.

- Joined. At the sealing of the covenant they stood fully one with Israel. They swore to keep God's law and to stay separate from the surrounding peoples.

- Named. God kept every family name on record. He sees the smallest fruit of His work, and quiet, supporting service still refreshes His people.

Ezra 2:55 · Darby

The children of Solomon's servants the children of Sotai, the children of Sophereth, the children of Peruda,

The list of those who came home from Babylon ends with its lowest ranks: the sons of Solomon's servants, named family by family. Why does God keep the names of temple workers who may not even have been Israelites?

Who Solomon's Servants Were

Who were they? One commentator admits how little is certain:

Then comes the record of the sons of Solomon's servants. These, with the Nethinim, were three hundred and ninety-two. We know nothing certain about these other servants. Their duty seems to have been like that of the Nethinim. Some think they were the descendants of the foreigners Solomon enlisted to build the temple.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

(The Nethinim, listed just before them, were lower servants of the sanctuary.) Another writer links the name to forced labour Solomon imposed on peoples left in the land, and then asks what brought these servants back:

About these servants the information is less clear. But we read that Solomon put the Amorites and other peoples left in the land under lasting forced labour (1 Kings 9:19-21). Israel had not been able to destroy those peoples completely. The descendants of these people may be the ones known as "Solomon's servants." However that may be, the same lesson holds: the least connection with the Lord's people and the Lord's things becomes a means of blessing — usually blessing in this life rather than spiritual blessing. Yet with "the servants of Solomon" there must have been more, for through grace they had returned, of their own desire, to help build the house of God at Jerusalem.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why the Names Were Kept

A list of obscure families can look like filler. One commentator reads its very existence as the point:

The fact that this list exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have grasped His thoughts about His house only weakly. Still, He kept this list. It proves that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It proves too that He knows the names of His people and makes them known, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Small Jobs, Recorded Names

Their service was lowly. One writer applies that to anyone who serves out of sight today:

These modest tasks are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God carefully records all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. Whether it is serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, or taking care of the "upper room", the Lord forgets none of it. He records the names of those who kept this service just as fittingly as the others. And we shall see, in more than one case, that the child of God who took the last place, forgetting himself to serve others, will hold a place of honour. Meanwhile a striking gift, which tended to glorify man instead of Christ, will sit down in shame in the last place.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Outsiders Inside the Register

Where did such servants come from? One commentator traces the Nethinim back to peoples God spared, and sees mercy in their servitude:

Here, then, we probably find the origin of the Nethinim — those whom God spared from His just judgment. If He brought them down to slavery, it was slavery in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse that rested on them turned into a blessing. Instead of dying by the sword of the Lord's army, they were rescued. Centuries later we find them honoured among the Lord's people, with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they came back from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Their return stands out against those who stayed behind:

We do not read of any of these servants refusing this place of submission to Israel. Their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable loyalty to the God of Israel, since they were Gentiles and had been away from Judah for 70 years. After such a long absence, not all the Jews were ready to return to their own country. So the faith of these Gentiles who had joined Israel shines out all the brighter.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Every Member Counted

One writer carries the same thought into the church:

And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim and Solomon's servants. These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they were occupied with lowly service. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. In the same way, members of the body of Christ have different tasks, duties, and abilities. The most prominent ones may not be the most important.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Origin — No one knows for sure who these servants were. Writers suggest foreigners Solomon used to build the temple, or peoples he forced into labour.

- Mercy — God spared them instead of destroying them. Their slavery was mercy tied to His house, so a curse became a blessing.

- Loyalty — They were Gentiles, yet they came back after seventy years away. Many Jews stayed home. Their faith shines the brighter.

- Record — God writes down the names of those who did the smallest jobs. He looks with joy on the least fruit of His Spirit's work.

- Reversal — The one who takes the last place to serve others receives honour. Being prominent is not the same as being important.

Ezra 2:56 · Darby

the children of Jaalah, the children of Darkon, the children of Giddel,

Jaalah, Darkon and Giddel are three of the last names in the long register of Jews who came home from exile. They were not from Israel's tribes but from "the sons of Solomon's servants" — the lowest group on the list. So why does God write down their family names at all?

Place in the register

The chapter sorts the returning people into groups. These three names fall in the last group.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Who Solomon's servants were

Commentators differ on where this group came from. One view treats the matter as open:

Then comes the record of the children of Solomon's servants. These, with the Nethinim, numbered 392. We know nothing certain about these other servants, whose work seems to have been like that of the Nethinim. Some take them to be the descendants of the foreigners whom Solomon had enlisted to build the temple (1 Kings 5:13).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another writer sees no doubt about their origin. He also asks why only eleven of their families are named:

1 Kings 9:20-21 makes it perfectly clear who these people descended from. In the glorious days of the first kingdom we meet them as slaves. Now, on Israel's return from captivity, the children of eleven of these original inhabitants are honourably mentioned as sharing the fortunes of the nation. Had these eleven, whose names are recorded, stood out by their whole-hearted devotion, each to his own lowly task?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Bondage that became blessing

These families may have started as forced labour. Even so, the tie to God's people did them good.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Small tasks, recorded names

The work behind these names was menial, and that is exactly why the list matters.

There were 139 gatekeepers. The Nethinim — the lower servants of the sanctuary — together with Solomon's servants numbered 392 (v. 58). These modest duties are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly registers all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. Serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, taking care of the "upper room" — the Lord forgets none of it. He records the names of those who have kept the charge of this service just as deservedly as any other.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The overlooked are counted

A human record-keeper would have left the men of verse 56 out.

And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim (v. 43) and Solomon's servants (v. 55). These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they were occupied with lowly service. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. In the same way, the members of the body of Christ have different tasks, duties and abilities. The most prominent members may not be the most important ones (1 Cor. 12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Named servants, discredited priests

A few verses later, some priests lose their standing. They cannot prove their family line, while these servants keep their place on the list.

How striking and instructive! Some failed to prove their title and were discredited. Whatever the cause, failing to show the father's house was fatal! They might really be priests; but if their title could not be found, they were treated as unclean and removed from the priesthood.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Lowest place. Jaalah, Darkon and Giddel head families in the last group on the list: the servants of Solomon. They come after Israel, Levi and the Nethinim.

- Outsider origin. Their ancestors may not have been Israelites at all — either foreigners drafted for temple work, or slaves of Solomon's reign.

- Gift of nearness. Even the slightest link to the Lord's people and the Lord's things became a channel of blessing for them. And they came back of their own desire to help build God's house.

- Reach of the record. God notices the lowest jobs. He writes down the names of those who serve tables and keep the room. The most visible workers are not always the most important.

- Result at the roll-call. God keeps these unknown servants on His list. Priests who could not prove their family line were set aside. A place among God's people rests on what He records, not on reputation.

Ezra 2:57 · Darby

the children of Shephatiah, the children of Hattil, the children of Pochereth-Hazzebaim, the children of Ami.

Ezra 2 lists the families who came back from exile in Babylon to rebuild Jerusalem. Verse 57 closes the roll of "the sons of Solomon's servants" with four names almost no one remembers. Why would God keep the family names of temple workers? And why record the lowest group in the nation as fully as the priests?

Why the List Exists

This list survived. That tells us about God before it tells us about the people on it.

The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — however weakly they may have grasped His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It shows He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that He knows and announces the very names of His people. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Who Solomon's Servants Were

The chapter sorts the returning company into groups. These last names belong to the two lowest: the Nethinim, servants of the sanctuary, and Solomon's servants.

Here, then, we probably find the origin of the Nethinim — those who were spared from the just judgment of God. They were reduced to slave labour, but it was slavery in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse resting on them became a blessing. Instead of dying by the sword of the Lord's army, they were rescued. Centuries later we find them in honourable association with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they came back from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in this age. About Solomon's servants the information is less clear. But we read that Solomon imposed lasting forced labour on the children of the Amorites and others left in the land, whom the children of Israel had not been able to destroy completely (1 Kings 9:19-21). The descendants of these men may be the ones who received the title "Solomon's servants." Either way, the lesson already drawn is again telling: the smallest link with the Lord's people and the Lord's things becomes a means of blessing — not always spiritual blessing, but nearly always earthly blessing. But with Solomon's servants there must have been more than this. Through grace they had returned, by their own desire, to help build the house of God at Jerusalem.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. Another writer compares their duty to the Nethinim but leaves their origin open:

Then comes the record of the children of Solomon's servants. We know nothing certain about these extra servants. Their duty looks much like that of the Nethinim. Some take them to be the descendants of the foreigners whom Solomon enlisted in the building of the temple (1 Kings 5:13).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Name and a Place

The names in this verse are ordinary, and one of them even carries a hometown. Reference works can say little more than that a man existed, served, and had descendants who came home:

Hattil. Servant of Solomon, whose descendants returned from exile. Ezra 2:57; Neh. 7:59.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Zebaim. The place to which Pochereth, a servant of Solomon, belonged. Ezra 2:57; Neh. 7:59.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Small Service, Full Record

The care taken over these obscure families carries straight into everyday Christian service.

The gatekeepers numbered 139. The Nethinim, or lower servants of the sanctuary, together with Solomon's servants, numbered 392 (v. 58). These modest duties are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God is pleased to record all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. The Lord forgets none of it — serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, looking after the "upper room". He records the names of those who kept this service, and they deserve it as much as any. And we shall see, more than once, that the child of God who took the last place, forgetting himself to serve others, will hold a place of honour. Meanwhile a striking gift, which tended to glorify man rather than Christ, will sit down in shame in the last place.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

No Forgotten Members

What God does with a list, He also does with a church.

And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim (v.43) and Solomon's servants (v.55). These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they were occupied with lowly service. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. It is the same in the body of Christ. Members have different tasks, duties, and abilities. The most prominent ones may not be the most important ones (1 Cor. 12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Recorded — God kept this list. It shows He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that He knows and announces His people's names.

- Rescued — These families came from peoples under judgment. Slavery tied to God's house turned the curse on them into a blessing.

- Returned — Centuries later they stand in honourable association with the Lord's people, back from Babylon with a heart for His house.

- Ranked — Modest duties are very valuable in God's eyes. The one who takes the last place to serve others will hold a place of honour.

- Remembered — God takes account of those we might have forgotten. In the body of Christ, the most prominent members may not be the most important.

Ezra 2:58 · Darby

All the Nethinim and the children of Solomon's servants, three hundred and ninety-two.

The list of returning exiles ends with one total for two groups: the temple servants (called the Nethinim in older translations) and the descendants of Solomon's servants. They are named after the priests, Levites, singers and gatekeepers, which raises the question of who they were and why God counted them.

Who the Temple Servants Were

One commentator explains the name and the arrangement behind it:

The word seems to mean "those that are given." From the place where their names appear in this chapter (see also 1 Chr. 9:2), writers have concluded that they came from another race, but had been given to the Levites at the start to serve them. In the same way the Levites had been given to Aaron for the Lord's service in His tabernacle — though the Levites were given by God's own command, and in the place of Israel's firstborn (see Num. 8).

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A second writer adds where the group started and who they may have been:

The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted" — that is, given to God. According to Ezra 8:20 this order started with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites, whom Joshua appointed as helpers to the Levites (Josh. 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God, set to certain duties in the temple.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Sentence of Servitude Turned to Blessing

Joshua had spared the Gibeonites, but he put them under a curse and made them servants at the house of God. Set against that, their place in this list is striking:

This is probably where the Nethinim came from: people who were spared from the just judgment of God. They were brought down into slavery, but it was slavery in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse that rested on them (see Joshua 9:23) was turned into a blessing. For what do we find? Instead of being destroyed by the sword of the Lord's army, they were rescued. Now, centuries later, they stand in honoured company with the Lord's people. They had a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in our own day.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Solomon's Servants

The second group in the total is harder to identify, and writers say so:

Then comes the record of the children of Solomon's servants. These with the Nethinim were three hundred and ninety-two. We know nothing certain about these other servants, whose duty appears to have been much like that of the Nethinim. Some take them to be descendants of the foreigners whom Solomon had drafted to build the temple (1 Kings 5:13).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Others point instead to the forced labour Solomon imposed on the Canaanite peoples left in the land. Either way, the same conclusion follows:

However this might have been, the lesson already drawn is again significant, that the least connection with the Lord's people and the Lord's things becomes a means of blessing.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A Small Number, a Valued Service

The number is small, and so was the work. One commentator finds the point of the list right there:

The Nethinim, the lower servants of the sanctuary, together with Solomon's servants numbered 392 (v. 58). These modest jobs are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly records all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. Whether it is serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, or taking care of the "upper room", the Lord forgets none of it. He records the names of those who have kept charge of this service just as fittingly as the others. And we shall see, in more than one case, that the child of God who took the last place, forgetting himself to serve others, will hold a place of honour.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Counted Among the People

Any register might easily have dropped these men: outsiders by birth, doing the lowest tasks. God's record runs the other way:

God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim (v.43) and Solomon's servants (v.55). They may not have been of Jewish descent, and their service was lowly. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. In the same way, in the body of Christ, members have different tasks, duties and abilities, and the most prominent ones may not be the most important ones (1 Cor. 12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — the name means "those that are given," or "devoted." These men were handed to the Levites to serve God's house, just as the Levites were given to Aaron.

- Spared — their likely ancestors, the Gibeonites, escaped judgment and became servants instead. In God's mercy the curse on them turned into a blessing tied to His house.

- Reached — writers are not sure who Solomon's servants were. The lesson holds either way: the least link with the Lord's people and the Lord's things becomes a means of blessing.

- Counted — 392 people did lowly work, and God listed them family by family. He values such modest service and forgets none of it.

- Honoured — the one who takes the last place and forgets himself in serving others will hold a place of honour. The most prominent servants are not always the most important.

Ezra 2:59 · Darby

And these are they that went up from Tel-melah, Tel-harsha, Cherub-Addan, Immer; but they could not shew their fathers' house, nor their seed, whether they were of Israel.

Ezra 2 is a careful headcount of the people who came back from Babylon to rebuild, family by family, town by town. Verse 59 turns to a group who made the journey but could not produce what the whole list rested on: proof that they belonged to Israel.

Why the register mattered

The returning exiles had learned what dealing with the surrounding nations cost them. They made sure the rebuilt community would not repeat it.

The first thing to notice is this. They had felt what it was to deal with the Gentiles. They had experienced the power and wickedness of those whose help they had once sought. So the children of the captivity resolve that Israel shall be an unmixed Israel, and proved to be so. They are most careful in verifying the genealogies of the people, and of the priests, so that none but Israel should share in the work. This was a return, and the disorder that sin had brought in was no longer to be endured.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the proof was missing

Tel-melah, Tel-harsha and the rest were places of exile, and exile is where the records slipped away.

In the land of their exile they had not taken the same care about title and qualification. Babylon stands for the corruption that God's people are in bondage to through their sins. So their captivity was a time of carelessness. They were suffering under the hand of their God, but it was still a time of confusion and disorder. It had to be so, since they were without the temple, without sacrifices, and without the Lord's presence.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Six hundred and fifty-two who came anyway

These families were not turned back at the road, though the record later loses sight of them.

There were six hundred and fifty-two who had joined the company from the Babylonian places Tel-melah, Tel-harsa, Cherub, Addan and Immer. They were the children of Delaiah, of Tobiah and Nekoda. These could not show their descent. They were allowed to return with the rest, but their names are not found in Ezra 10:25-43 or in Nehemiah 10:15-28.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Unproven, not denied

The verdict on them was narrower than it first sounds, and for the priests it left a door open.

If any could not show their genealogy, they had no claim to take part in the work they had been called to… They were not told that they were not priests. The ground taken was that their claim was not proven. It might be proven at a future time… When that time came, the priest would once more have divine intelligence and discernment through the light and perfection of God (Urim and Thummim). He might then judge them to be truly priests. Meanwhile their claim was forfeited. Grace could restore what was lost under law; only for this they must wait patiently.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Honesty about a weak day

Nobody waved the missing papers through. The refusal was honest about the state of that day.

This problem could only arise because priestly service had stopped for 70 years, and because of all the confusion the Babylonian captivity brought… Under the circumstances, the best course is to take account of our weakness and not to pretend to have what we do not have. It must have been hard to refuse those priests. But doing so showed that they put God first, not human feelings.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The same uncertainty today

Commentators also draw a personal lesson. Mixing with the world leaves people unsure where they belong.

Mingling with the Gentile world had caused the Israelites to lose the certainty of their nationality. Is it any wonder, then, that the mixing of the church with the world has left so many unsure whether they are the saved children of God?… Clearly there were many Israelites who could not show their genealogy. There are many Christians who cannot show it either. They are so confused by the false position they are in that they cannot tell whether their names are written in heaven or not.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

So where does certainty come from? Not from old records, but from Christ.

We must know Jesus, the Great High Priest in the presence of God. He once bore our sins on the cross, but He is now crowned with glory… In His face shine the lights and perfections of God. How can you enter the holiest place by the blood of Jesus if you are uncertain whether you are saved? Oh, search the register. Never rest, my reader, until this first question is settled.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Register: the returning exiles checked every family line. Israel was to be an unmixed Israel, and only Israel would share the work.

- Babylon: the missing records are the fruit of captivity. It was a time of carelessness and disorder, with no temple, no sacrifices and no presence of the Lord.

- Mercy: the 652 still travelled up with everyone else. They lost their standing and their place in the later lists, but not the journey itself.

- Unproven: the ruling was that they had not proved their claim, not that it was false. The question stayed open until a priest with Urim and Thummim should stand up. Grace could still restore what was lost under law.

- Certainty: what Israel lost by mixing with the nations, believers can lose by mixing with the world. Search the register by looking to the Great High Priest, not at yourself.

Ezra 2:60 · Darby

The children of Delaiah, the children of Tobijah, the children of Nekoda, six hundred and fifty-two.

This verse names three families — 652 people in all — who came home from exile with everyone else. They could not prove they belonged to Israel, and the chapter turns on that gap: how did the record get lost, and who carries the loss?

Babylon Behind the Missing Record

One writer points back to the seventy years in Babylon. There, the care over a man's title had fallen away.

In the land of their exile they had not taken the same care about title and qualification. Babylon stands for the corruption that holds God's people in bondage through their sins. So the time of their captivity was a time of carelessness. They were indeed suffering under the hand of their God, but it was still a time of confusion and disorder. It had to be so, since they were without the temple, without sacrifices, and without Jehovah's presence.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Counted, Yet Not Proved

These families came home with everyone else. But their names stop appearing in the later lists.

There were 652 who had joined the company from the Babylonian places Tel-melah, Tel-harsa, Cherub, Addan and Immer. They were the sons of Delaiah, of Tobiah and Nekoda. These could not show their descent. They were allowed to return with the rest, but their names are not found in Ezra 10:25-43 or in Nehemiah 10:15-28.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why the Check Happened Now

Earlier generations had faced no such check. The remnant began it because this was a return, not a beginning.

The children of the captivity resolve that Israel shall be an unmixed Israel, and they mean to prove it. They take great care to verify the genealogies of the people and of the priests, so that none but Israel would share in the work. In the past, one priest followed another with no examination beforehand. No one verified the genealogy, and children simply stepped into their father's place and enjoyed the privileges God had granted them… This was not the beginning of their history, nor the power suited to a beginning. It was a return, and they would no longer put up with the disorder that sin had brought in… So even among those who had come back to Judea, anyone who could not produce his genealogy was set aside. Divine discernment might perhaps recognise them and their rights another day, but the people who had returned from captivity could not do so.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Keeping the Papers Was an Act of Faith

If some families arrived with no register, others arrived with theirs intact. Holding on to a scroll of ancestry through seventy years in a foreign empire took conviction, because nothing in Babylon made it look useful.

Happy the man who had preserved his own, and who had so valued the heritage of Jehovah as to attach worth to it! It was a proof of faith, for someone might have said, What use are these genealogies in Babylon?

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where the Loss Fell

In settled times no one had to produce a genealogy. A time of ruin changes that, and one writer says where the loss then falls.

Here we find the first feature which ought to mark a remnant. In normal times a man was not held accountable to present his genealogy. It was plain to everyone that a priest could not claim a place which did not belong to him. In a time of ruin it is quite different. When foreign elements have broken into the house of God, the faithful must keep close watch to oppose any mixing with the world… The case is the same today: the greatest vigilance is needed, to make sure that the life of God is really joined to the Christian profession. Those whom the assembly of Israel could not acknowledge, even though they might really be part of the people, had no one to blame but themselves if they were not admitted to the service of the temple.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Weakness Owned Rather Than Papered Over

The strength of the remnant's action was that it admitted what it could not settle. It neither invented a title nor pretended the problem away.

How striking and instructive! A day of weakness demands care not to go beyond our measure. Only power can clear up deadlocks. Some failed to prove their title and lost their standing… But whatever the cause, failing to show the father's house was fatal!

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Babylon — Seventy years of captivity, with no temple and no sacrifices, was a time of carelessness. These families came home carrying its cost in a lost record.

- Counted — They came home with the rest. This verse names and numbers them, yet their names drop out of the later lists.

- Unmixed — The remnant checked every genealogy. This was a return, not a beginning, and they would no longer put up with the disorder sin had brought in.

- Faith — Keeping a register through exile proved faith. In Babylon, people could ask what use such papers were.

- Owned — A day of weakness calls for care not to go beyond our measure. Failing to show the father's house was decisive, and the loss lay with those who had let the record slip, not with those who asked.

Ezra 2:61 · Darby

And of the children of the priests the children of Habaiah, the children of Koz, the children of Barzillai; who took a wife of the daughters of Barzillai the Gileadite, and was called after their name.

The list of returning exiles pauses over some priests who could not prove they were priests. One family among them even carried a name that was not their own — and the verse tells us why.

Why the register mattered now

Exile had made such checking impossible. The return made it urgent. One writer sets the two times side by side.

In the land of their exile they had not taken the same care about claims and qualifications. Babylon stands for the corruption that holds God's people in bondage through their sins. So their captivity was a careless time — a time when they suffered under the hand of their God, and still a time of confusion and disorder. It had to be so, since they had no temple, no sacrifices, and no presence of the Lord. But through the mercy of their God there had been a recovery — partial, it is true, but the Spirit of God was clearly at work in it. Now the Lord's house was to be their centre again, so they were right to weigh the claim of everyone who had returned from Babylon.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Another writer explains why the problem could not have arisen earlier, and names what they had lost.

This problem could only arise because priestly service had stopped for 70 years, and because of all the confusion that came with the Babylonian captivity. In other words, it was a result of the ruin of the people — and, of course, of some carelessness by these priests, if indeed they were priests, in keeping their documents together. There was a further difficulty: they no longer had the Urim and Thummim, as they once did. These would have let them find out the truth.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

"Called by their name"

The strange detail in the verse is a priest who married into Barzillai's family and took his wife's family name.

One writer explains why that match looked so good, and what it cost.

No doubt the marriage was considered a very good match for the young priest, and it brought wealth, riches and honour with it. Barzillai was a very great man, and so immensely wealthy that he could support the king out of his own money while the king was rejected. It was no light thing to become the son-in-law of such a man. The young priest, against God's order, gave up his own name and took the name of his wife. So in Ezra he stands with the name "Barzillai." His own priestly name is gone — gone, it appears, in his desire to get on in the world, for riches, wealth and honour. No doubt he gained all these, and he probably thought the price he paid was very small. How little he knew that his act would cost his children their blessed, privileged place as priests five hundred years later! But we cannot gain advancement in the things of the world without loss in the things of heaven.

Modernised from George C WillisOriginal wording

Not disproved — only unproven

The exclusion that follows in verse 62 was not a verdict that these men were frauds.

They were not told that they were not priests. The ground taken was that their claim was not proven. It might be proven later, and so "the governor told them that they were not to partake of the most holy food, until there should be a priest to consult Urim and Thummim." When that day came, that priest would again have divine intelligence and discernment through the light and perfection of God, and he might judge them to be true priests. But meanwhile they lost their claim. Grace could restore what was lost under law; only, for that they must wait patiently.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

One writer looks ahead to the priest they were waiting for.

"Until there should be a priest to consult Urim and Thummim" — that is, until the Lord Jesus comes. He will no doubt be the King, and He will also act in the full power of priesthood, the power of Urim and Thummim in the lights and perfections of God. He will then untangle all the confusion and supply all that is lacking.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Refusing to settle it by human judgment

Human judgment offered a way out of the deadlock. One writer shows what faith did instead.

"Decide the matter by human rules of evidence," is the natural reply. "Settle their status one way or the other, by the best light we have." That is how man brings his own wisdom into the things of God. But Zerubbabel was a man of faith. He would not act without God. No thought of convenience, no wish to strengthen the priesthood, would make him put them in without God's sanction... What a lesson for the day of ruin! How refreshing is the faith that, when God gives no guidance, refuses to act in the wisdom of the flesh or for convenience. It simply stands still and waits on God.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Summary

- Ruin. The missing registers point to a wider collapse: seventy years without priestly service, and some carelessness about the papers.

- Compromise. One ancestor married well and gave up his own name for it. That is why his family could no longer trace their line.

- Cost. Five centuries later his children paid for that choice. They lost their place as priests. Gain in the world meant loss in heaven.

- Restraint. The leaders did not call these men false priests, only unproven. They refused to settle the doubt by human evidence or for convenience.

- Waiting. They left the case open until a priest with Urim and Thummim should come. One writer sees here a pointer to the Lord Jesus, who will untangle all the confusion and supply all that is lacking.

Ezra 2:62 · Darby

These sought their genealogical register, but they were not found; therefore were they, as polluted, removed from the priesthood.

Seventy years in Babylon had broken the paper trail, and now a group of families claiming priestly descent came home to find no record of their names. The register said nothing about their sincerity. Yet it settled everything about their place. Why should a missing document cost a man his ministry?

Why the Problem Only Appeared Now

One commentator points to two causes running together: the collapse of the nation and carelessness with papers.

It is important to see that this sort of problem would not have arisen in the early days. Back then, everyone knew who the priests and their families were. This problem could only arise because priestly service had stopped for 70 years, and because of all the confusion that came with the Babylonian captivity. In other words, it was a consequence of the ruin of the people. And, of course, of a certain carelessness in these priests — if indeed they were priests — about keeping their documents together. An added difficulty was that they no longer had the Urim and Thummim, as they used to, which would have let them find out the truth.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Carelessness in Babylon, Care at Jerusalem

A second writer connects that carelessness to what Babylon itself stood for.

In the land of their exile they had not taken the same care about title and qualification. Babylon represents the corruption to which God's people are in bondage through their sins. So the period of their captivity was a time of carelessness. They were suffering under the hand of their God, but it was still a time of confusion and disorder. It had to be, since they were without the temple, without sacrifices, and without the Lord's presence. But now, through the mercy of their God, there had been a recovery... and now that the Lord's house was once more to become their centre, they were right to be careful about the title of everyone who had returned from Babylon.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Excluded, But Not Condemned

The exclusion rested on missing evidence, not on a verdict about these men. (Older translations read "as polluted, put from the priesthood.")

When the remnant who returned found certain priests who could not show their genealogy, they put them out of the priesthood. This was not because anyone could disprove their claim, but because no one could prove it. No one could decide whether they were really priests. There was no recognised way of getting an answer from God.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Another writer draws the line between what the leaders could judge and what they left with God:

The mere claim of descent by the person in question was not enough. In times of ruin, someone who lays claim to a title must prove his right to it. Not that Zerubbabel questioned the claim. That he left to God. "The Lord knows those who are his" (2 Tim. 2:19). But they could only decide on clear evidence.

Modernised from Hendrik Leendert HeijkoopOriginal wording

The Old Choice Behind the Missing Name

One writer traces the missing name back to a wedding generations earlier.

Long years before, one of their forefathers married a daughter of Barzillai the Gileadite. No doubt it seemed a very good match for the young priest. Against God's order, the young priest gave up his own name and took the name of his wife. So in Ezra he stands with the name "Barzillai". But his own priestly name is lost. It was lost, it seems, in the desire for worldly advancement, riches, wealth and honour. No doubt he gained all these, and he probably thought the price he paid was very small. But how little he thought that his act, five hundred years later, would cost his children their blessed, privileged place as priests!

Modernised from George C WillisOriginal wording

Held Over, Not Closed

The ruling suspended these men; it did not finish them.

They were not told that they were not priests. The ground taken was that their claim was not proven. It might be proven at a future time... Meanwhile their claim was forfeited. Grace could restore what was lost under law; only for this they must patiently wait.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Lesson for a Weak Day

The same writer brings this home to Christians today.

It is essential to realise that the church, as far as its practical testimony and state go, is in ruins today... Under the circumstances, the best course of action is to take account of our weakness and not to pretend to have what we do not have. It must have been hard to refuse those priests. But doing so simply showed that they put God first, not human feelings.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — ruin lost the register: seventy years without priestly service, plus careless record-keeping.

- Cost — one ancestor traded his priestly name for a rich marriage. His children paid for it five centuries later.

- Charge — "unclean" here means unproven, not disproved. No one doubted their hearts, only their papers.

- Conduct — the leaders judged by the evidence in hand. They left the rest with God and claimed no power they no longer had.

- Conclusion — the ruling held the case open. What law forfeited, grace could restore to those willing to wait.

Ezra 2:63 · Darby

And the Tirshatha said to them that they should not eat of the most holy things, till there stood up a priest with Urim and with Thummim.

The exiles had come home, but not every record had survived. Several families claiming priestly descent could not prove it, so the governor barred them from the priests' food until a priest with Urim and Thummim could settle the case.

Who the Tirshatha Was

The ESV says simply "the governor." The writers here use an older translation, which keeps the word behind it: Tirshatha.

A great number of priests "looked for their genealogical register, but they were not found; so they were treated as unclean and removed from the priesthood. And [Zerubbabel] the Tirshatha (a Persian word: the name given in Ezra and Nehemiah to the governor of Jerusalem under the Persian kings) said to them that they were not to eat of the most holy things..."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Unproven, Not Disproved

No one had evidence against these men. The problem was that no one had evidence for them, and the usual way of asking God had gone.

When the remnant who returned found priests who could not show their genealogy, those priests were put out of the priesthood. No one had disproved their claim; they could not prove it. There was no one to decide whether they truly were priests, and no recognised way of getting an answer from God. So they were told to wait until a priest stood up with Urim and Thummim.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

This was a suspension, not a verdict. The door stayed open.

They were not told that they were not priests. The ruling was only that their claim was not proven. It might be proven at a future time... but meanwhile their claim was forfeited. Grace could restore what was lost under law; only for this they must wait patiently.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

No Human Substitute for a Divine Answer

There was an obvious fix: settle it by the best evidence available and fill out a thin priesthood at the same time. Zerubbabel refused.

"Decide the matter by human rules of evidence," is the natural reply; "settle their standing one way or the other, by the best light we have." That is how man brings his own wisdom into the things of God. But Zerubbabel was a man of faith. He would not act without God. No motive of convenience, not even the need to strengthen the priesthood, would make him put them in without God's approval... What a blessed and refreshing faith this is! When God gives no guidance, it refuses the wisdom of the flesh and the pull of convenience; it stands still and waits patiently on God.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

What the Urim and Thummim Were

The names of the two say what they did — and this verse marks where they were lost.

These two words mean "Light" and "Perfection." No one knows just what they were or how they worked. After the captivity in Babylon they were lost, as Ezra 2:63 shows. What seems certain is that through the Urim and the Thummim people could ask God and get an answer, so that divine light could be shed on dark points in Israel's history in a perfect way.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Priest Who Will Stand Up

The ruling ends by pointing to a person still to come.

"The Tirshatha (or governor) said to them that they were not to eat of the most holy things" — that is, they were not to have the full enjoyment of priestly privilege — "until there stood up a priest with Urim and with Thummim." That is, until the Lord Jesus comes by and by. He will, no doubt, be the King, and He will also act in the full power of priesthood, the power of Urim and Thummim, in the lights and perfections of God. He will then untangle all the confusion and supply all that is lacking.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

For Israel, that priest has still not stood up.

Israel after the flesh has never had this since, and least of all when they refused the Lord Jesus. It will not always be so. They will look on Him whom they pierced; and then there will be pardon and peace, power and blessing.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Living Honestly With What Is Missing

The decision cost something, and one writer applies it to us.

In these circumstances, the best course is to face our weakness and not to pretend to have what we do not have (v.63). It must have been hard to refuse those priests, but doing so showed that they put God first, not human feelings.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Lost. Urim and Thummim, "Light" and "Perfection," were the way to ask God and get a clear answer. This verse shows they were gone after the captivity.

- Unproven. No one disproved these priests. They could not prove their claim, and no way remained of settling it.

- Suspended. No one told them they were not priests. Their claim stayed open for a future day, and they had to wait.

- Unforced. Zerubbabel would not settle it by human evidence, even to fill out a thin priesthood. With no word from God, he stood still.

- Awaited. The ruling points to a priest yet to stand up. He will untangle the confusion and supply what is lacking. Until then, honesty about weakness beats pretending.

Ezra 2:64 · Darby

The whole congregation together was forty-two thousand three hundred and sixty,

The register closes with a single total for everyone who came up out of Babylon: 42,360. That one figure raises two questions. Why count a group this small? And why is the total larger than the names listed?

A small number by any human measure

The count only shows its true size when set beside what the nation once was.

To a casual observer it must have seemed quite a small matter. About 42,000 Jews were restored to the land of their fathers under the leadership of Zerubbabel (Ezra 2). And remember that in the days of Jehoshaphat Judah could keep a standing army of 1,160,000 men (2 Chron. 17:12-18). Next to that, the returned remnant was poor indeed. It was "a day of small things," as Zech. 4:10 expresses it.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Most of the people stayed where they were. One writer sets the proportion plainly — of those who could have gone, only a fraction did:

But in grace God remembered the faithful remnant. He moved the heart of Cyrus, the king of Persia, to let the Jewish people return to Jerusalem after the seventy years of captivity. Isaiah had prophesied this 150-200 years before (Isa. 45). Only a small part of Judah and Benjamin made use of this opportunity. The majority had no longing for the God-given land nor for Jerusalem where the temple had stood.

Modernised from Hendrik Leendert HeijkoopOriginal wording

Small, yet each one counted

A small figure did not mean a small interest on God's part.

The whole assembly totaled 42,360, plus servants and singers adding 7,537 to the number. This was only a small percentage of Judah and Benjamin, but the Lord took account of every one... But at least Judah did have "a little strength" (Compare Revelation 3:8).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The register records a choice. Every person in that total had to get past the arguments for staying in Babylon.

And God took note carefully of all those who overcame the many counter-arguments and who went up. It is good to see a recovery of priestly activity among the people (v.36), as well as of service by the Levites (v.40). But Levites always seem to be in short supply. Here we find just 74 Levites for about 4,000 priests.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Why the total is bigger than the list

Add up the families named earlier in the chapter and you do not reach 42,360. The chapter itself explains part of the gap.

So the number of people registered was 29,166 (Ezra 2:1-35; 36-58). But the whole assembly together consisted of 42,360 persons (v. 64). Among them, 652 (v. 60) of the children of Israel could not prove that they were really part of the people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

So "the whole assembly together" covers more than those whose descent stood on record. The people screened that record with care, and still let the unproved travel home with them.

These verses tell us how careful the people were not to tolerate anyone among them whose origin was in any way doubtful. They were determined that Israel should be an unmixed Israel... There were 652 who had joined the company from the Babylonian places Tel-melah, Tel-harsa, Cherub, Addan and Immer. They were the children of Delaiah, of Tobiah and Nekoda. These could not show their descent. They were allowed to return with the rest, but their names are not found in Ezra 10:25-43 or in Nehemiah 10:15-28.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A minority that still held the whole people in view

Two tribes out of twelve made the journey, and not even all of those. Their view of the nation stayed wider than their numbers.

There they were, a minority from two tribes out of 12. And yet they are conscious of the whole people. They offer 12 male goats, making the point that the people was made up of 12 tribes, that all 12 tribes had sinned, and that the only way for God to bless and forgive them would be through the sin offering. Ten tribes were completely absent. Many who belonged to Judah and Benjamin had stayed in Babylon. Neither fact stopped them from remembering the whole people before God.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Not a test of numbers

The small figure looks like a verdict on the whole venture. Those who went refused to read it that way.

But faith does not follow such considerations, however reasonable and correct they may seem. It does not look at circumstances. It does not judge whether a chosen path is right by the results that appear. It does not count upon the number of people making common cause with it. It does not let history judge God's instructions. It judges history by obedience to God's commandments.

Modernised from Hendrik Leendert HeijkoopOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted small. Judah once fielded an army of over a million. Now 42,360 came home — a day of small things.

- Counted individually. The percentage was small. Still, the Lord took account of every one who overcame the arguments for staying.

- Counted together. "The whole assembly together" runs ahead of the names listed. It takes in 652 who could not prove their descent and travelled home anyway.

- Counted for all. A minority from two tribes still remembered all twelve before God. They offered a sin offering for every tribe.

- Not counted by numbers. Faith does not measure a course by how many join it, but judges history by obedience to God's Word.

Ezra 2:65 · Darby

besides their servants and their maids, of whom there were seven thousand three hundred and thirty-seven; and they had two hundred singing men and singing women.

The chapter's long list of families ends with people no census usually bothers with. It counts household servants, and two hundred men and women whose work was to sing. Why does God's record keep counting after the important names are done?

The Servants Are Not Forgotten

Earlier in the chapter another group of servants appears: those attached to the sanctuary. The people counted here served in ordinary homes, and one writer draws the contrast:

Verse 43 speaks of the servants of the sanctuary. By contrast, verses 64 to 67 tell us of the servants and maid-servants of the people, for God does not forget them either. In one way or another, they fulfil their service. It may be washing the feet of the saints. It may be the humblest service for those who belong to the Lord. It may be no more than a cup of water given to one of these little ones. God keeps it in mind and records it.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Small Estate, Close Attention

The counting does not stop at people. What God records tells us something about Him:

Even their animals are counted. How little man knows of God! How good for His people! From His word they may learn how much He cares about them, and about everything that belongs to them. Their estate may be low, but His notice of it is all the more striking. Is this the way of man, Lord Jehovah?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Song on the Road Home

Two hundred singers travelled with a company just released from Babylon. Read one way, that number is the sound of the exile ending:

Singing was clearly a very prominent occupation on the journey toward the homeland. Their groaning was over. The captivity was behind them and freedom ahead. How beautiful the chanting of their great psalms must have been as they travelled. But a greater time is still coming. The wandering remnant, so long scattered among the nations, will turn homeward. Through the coming of their King their groaning will end forever, and they will sing the Hallelujah chorus in the kingdom of righteousness and peace.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Sound That Also Troubled Some

Commentators differ over these two hundred voices. Where one hears recovered joy, another hears the first crack in a movement:

But look closely at who made up this crowd, and you will see the sure signs of coming decline and decay. What, for example, had these pilgrims to do with singing men and singing women? Their land was desolate. Fire had destroyed their sanctuary, and it lay in ruins. They themselves were only a feeble remnant, just freed from captivity. Surely it was no time for entertainment and song! Sadly, man soon limits every work of the Spirit of God that revives the hearts of His people. He limits it by his own thoughts and desires.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Rossier offers a third reading: this singing was not the praise of the holy place that the sons of Asaph led, but served "to maintain, outside the set service of worship, the mutual communion of the people of God."

Few, Yet Enough

The whole company came to a little over forty-two thousand, with the servants and singers added on. Set beside the nation Judah had once been, the totals are small. One writer compares them with Solomon's stables:

This was only a small percentage of Judah and Benjamin, but the Lord took account of every one... As to the number of horses alone, this was nothing compared to Solomon's 40,000 stalls of horses (1 Kings 4:26). But at least Judah did have "a little strength" (compare Revelation 3:8).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted. The list goes past leaders and priests to household servants, singers and animals. God keeps account of everyone and everything that belongs to His people.

- Cared for. God notices and records the humblest service, down to a cup of water given to one of the little ones.

- Low. God does not despise a small company with few horses. Their low estate makes His notice more striking, not less.

- Contested. Writers read the two hundred singers in different ways. Some hear joy after Babylon, some hear fellowship among the people, some hear an early sign of decline.

- Coming. The songs on that road home point ahead to a greater homecoming. Then the scattered remnant's groaning ends forever under their King.

Ezra 2:66 · Darby

Their horses were seven hundred and thirty-six; their mules two hundred and forty-five;

The list of returning exiles ends by counting animals as exactly as it counted people. Why does Scripture keep a count of livestock, and what do these numbers say about the company that travelled from Babylon to Jerusalem?

Nothing Too Small to Notice

The surprise is not the numbers but that God recorded them at all. One writer draws a lesson from the counted animals:

God counts even their animals. How little man knows of God! How good it is for His people, who may learn from His word that He is interested both in them and in everything that belongs to them. Their condition may be low, but His notice of them is all the more impressive. Is this the way of man, Lord Jehovah?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Provision for a Long Road

These animals were useful, not decorative. One writer sees in the count a provision God made in advance:

Lastly, so that nothing might be forgotten, God even takes account of the animals (vv. 66, 67) — of everything which is useful to His people and helpful to them. He counts these too with care, and does not overlook a single one. What care this counting shows us! All along the journey that was to bring them to the house of God, God Himself had watched over His people. He had prepared the relief they needed for their weariness. He had made provision beforehand for the needs of the weak, the women and the little children. What a God is ours! Should we look for a better guide, a better guardian? Is not our Father the Creator and Keeper of all things?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Small Resources, Real Strength

Only a small part of the nation came home, and their resources matched their size. One writer sets the horse count beside Israel's wealth under Solomon:

The whole assembly totalled 42,360, plus servants and singers adding 7,537 to the number. This was only a small percentage of Judah and Benjamin, but the Lord took account of every one. Their livestock numbered 736 horses, 245 mules and 6,720 donkeys. As to the number of horses alone, this was nothing compared with Solomon's 40,000 stalls of horses (1 Kings 4:26). But at least Judah did have "a little strength" (compare Revelation 3:8).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The phrase quoted from Revelation is from an older translation; the ESV reads, "I know that you have but little power."

Counting as a Claim

Counting means something when God does it. Writing about the census of Israel in the wilderness, one commentator explains what:

He was careful in this way to assert His title and to survey His possessions. He wanted the number of Israel brought to Him exactly, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and knew their numbers.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

He states the principle directly: "The act of numbering is the symbol of appropriation. To number things expresses ownership of them" (J. G. Bellett). So the count of animals is a mark of God's ownership over the whole company.

Why the Record Survives

The animal count closes a chapter full of names. One writer explains what the survival of such a record proves:

The first thing to notice is the very existence of this record. It shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. That is true however weakly they had entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has preserved this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows that He knows and announces the very names of His people. All this encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted — The count reaches past the people to the animals. God is interested in His people and in everything that belongs to them.

- Carried — The animals were provision arranged in advance. They brought relief for weariness and care for the weak, the women and the children.

- Little — 736 horses were nothing beside Solomon's 40,000 stalls. Yet this small company still had "a little strength" for the work.

- Owned — To number a thing is to claim it. God's count asserts His title, and He knows both the names and the numbers.

- Remembered — The list survives as proof that God delights in the smallest fruit of His work. He keeps a record of faithfulness in a corrupt time.

Ezra 2:67 · Darby

their camels four hundred and thirty-five; the asses six thousand seven hundred and twenty.

The list of returning exiles ends with animals. Camels and donkeys carried these people across the desert from Babylon to Jerusalem — so why does God count pack animals in His Word?

God Counts the Animals Too

The list does not stop at people. One writer notes what comes next:

Even their animals are counted. How ignorant man is of God! How good for His people! From His word they can learn of His interest in them and in everything that belongs to them. Their situation may be low, but His notice is all the more striking.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Transport for a Long Road

Camels and donkeys were not ornaments. Tired people, women and children crossed hundreds of miles of open country on them. Counting them points back to who provided them.

Finally, so that nothing might be forgotten, God even takes account of the animals (vv. 66, 67) — of everything that is useful and helpful to His people. These are also carefully counted, without overlooking a single one. What care this numbering shows us! All along the journey to the house of God, God Himself watched over His people. He prepared the relief they needed for their tiredness. He provided in advance for the needs of the weak, the women and the little children. What a God is ours! Should we look for a better guide, a better guardian? Is not our Father the Creator and Keeper of all things?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Measured Against Former Glory

Put these totals beside the nation at its height and they look thin. One writer makes that comparison and still finds something to credit:

The whole assembly totalled 42,360, plus servants and singers adding 7,537 to the number. This was only a small percentage of Judah and Benjamin, but the Lord took account of every one. Their livestock numbered 736 horses, 245 mules and 6,720 donkeys. As to the number of horses alone, this was as nothing compared to Solomon's 40,000 stalls of horses (1 Kings 4:26). But at least Judah did have "a little strength" (compare Revelation 3:8).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The same principle runs through the chapter's closing gifts. What was given was modest, and that did not lower its worth:

The chief fathers voluntarily give a sum... This was little indeed, compared to what the chief fathers had formerly offered for the building of Solomon's temple (1 Chron. 29:6-9), but in a time of extreme poverty this gift had great value in the eyes of the Lord of the temple. He, the owner of all the treasures of the universe, valued it according to the zeal that moved them to offer it, just as later He valued the widow's small coin more than the surplus of the rich.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Not All Who Travelled Were an Asset

The travellers moved as one company. One writer looks closer at who made it up:

This was the large company that travelled from Babylon to Judah and Jerusalem. Their hearts were set on the holy task God had called them to. But look closer at the parts making up this crowd, and you will find the sure early signs of decline and decay... Man quickly limits every working of the Spirit of God that brings revival in the hearts of His people. He limits it by his own thoughts and desires. Even the first response to His mighty power gathers people who are really under His influence — and others too, who will corrupt the movement and make sure it fails outwardly.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why the Tally Was Kept at All

The whole inventory of Ezra 2 reappears later in Scripture, and that repetition is treated as deliberate:

Chapter 2 gives us the number and the names of the company that went up. The Spirit of God attaches such importance to this company that He records their names a second time, in the book of Nehemiah.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The same writer turns the register into a question for the reader:

Your name may be in the Lamb's Book of Life. Every redeemed sinner's name is there, all grace and mercy for Christ's sake alone. But does your name also have a place in what answers to Ezra 2?

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted. The register runs past people to animals. Nothing His people own falls outside His interest, and a low situation makes His notice more striking.

- Carried. God provided the camels and donkeys in advance — for tired travellers, for the weak, for women and children on the road to His house.

- Small. Next to Solomon's 40,000 stalls these totals are nothing. Yet the Lord counted every one, and a gift given in poverty is valued like the widow's coin.

- Mixed. The same caravan that set out on God's errand already carried the seeds of its own decline. Revival gathers the genuine and the corrupting together.

- Recorded. God kept this list and repeated it in Nehemiah. Your name may be in the Lamb's Book of Life — but is it also among those who went up?

Ezra 2:68 · Darby

And some of the chief fathers, when they came to the house of Jehovah which is at Jerusalem, offered freely for the house of God to set it up in its place.

The exiles reach Jerusalem. The first recorded act of their family heads is to give — freely, for a building that does not yet stand. Two questions follow. How could they come to "the house of the LORD" when the temple lay in ruins? And what makes a gift acceptable when the givers are poor?

A House That Was Still There

The wording is careful. It does not say they came to the ruins. One writer asks the obvious question:

It is beautiful to read in verse 68 that "they came to the house of God." What house, one might ask. The temple had been burnt many years ago and nothing had been rebuilt. But they had come to the right place, and in God's eyes this is where His house has to be and is.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

So the site itself held God's claim. The gift is for raising the house "on its site" — God had fixed the place before anyone laid a stone. Another writer notes why the exiles went straight there:

They must have gone at once to the ruins of the former temple, because that was the spot they loved. It is significant that although it was leveled to the ground, it still existed in the mind of God, and also in the thoughts of the people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Ruin That Opened Their Hands

The same wording tells us what moved the givers. What they saw when they arrived opened their hands:

It seems God used the ruined state of His sanctuary to touch the hearts of these heads of families. When they came to the LORD's house, they saw its condition. The sight moved them, and they "made freewill offerings" out of what they owned. The Spirit of God is careful to note, putting His approval on the act, that "according to their ability they gave." In this they are examples for all time to those of the Lord's people who have the privilege of serving the Lord.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Note the order: they looked, the sight moved them, they gave. No one appealed to them for money.

Free Giving, Never Pressure

The verse calls these gifts freewill offerings. One writer shows what that word rules out:

The principles in these statements apply to every age. The apostle Paul enforces the same when he says, "Each one must give as he has decided in his heart, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver" (2 Cor. 9:7)... So it matters more than anything to remember this: everything offered to God must come from hearts made willing by His Spirit. It must be spontaneous. It must not come from persuasion or outside pressure, but from the heart. The church of God would be in a very different state today if it had remembered this. What has caused more ruin than the many worldly schemes for raising money?

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Small Gifts, Weighed by the One Who Owns Everything

Their total looks large on its own. Set beside Solomon's day, it was small:

In verses 68 and 69 we find a second mark of these returned people: zeal for the building of the house of God. This is the devotion that sacrifices its own interests for the work of the Lord. The heads of families give a sum of their own free will... This was very little compared with what the heads of families had once given for building Solomon's temple (1 Chr. 29:6-9). But in a time of extreme poverty this gift had great value in the eyes of the Lord of the temple. He owns all the treasures of the universe, and He valued the gift by the zeal that moved them to offer it. In the same way He later valued the widow's two small coins more than the surplus of the rich.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Standard: Ability, Not a Fixed Rate

The text does not say they tithed. It says they gave in proportion to what they had. That measure is what carries over:

They were faithful in their giving, not according to the Law, the tenth part, but according to their ability. And in the New Testament the rule for the Church as to giving is stated in 1 Cor. 16:2, "On the first day of every week, each of you is to put something aside and store it up, as he may prosper."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Sight. They came to "the house of the LORD" when there was no house to see. God still counted the place as His, and so did they.

- Stirred. The ruin itself did the persuading. God used the state of His sanctuary to touch their hearts, and no one had to ask.

- Spontaneous. The offering was free. Gifts to God must come from willing hearts, never from persuasion, pressure, or money-raising schemes.

- Small. Their total was tiny next to Solomon's day, yet God prized it. The Owner of everything weighs the zeal behind a gift, as with the widow's two small coins.

- Standard. Not a fixed tenth but "according to their ability." The New Testament keeps the same measure: each gives as he prospers.

Ezra 2:69 · Darby

They gave after their ability to the treasure of the work sixty-one thousand darics of gold, and five thousand pounds of silver, and one hundred priests' coats.

The long list of returning exiles ends with money. Leading families reach a burnt-out temple site and hand over gold, silver and priests' garments — a sum far smaller than Israel once gave, and measured only by "their ability."

Free giving as a sign of real revival

One writer counts this gift among the marks that the return was genuine:

And when they got there, "they offered freely." This is another feature of this revival. There is a genuine interest in the things of God, in His work. And we read that "they gave according to their ability."

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

What they saw when they arrived

The text says they came to "the house of the LORD," though no house was standing. That wording explains what moved them to give:

Notice the form of the statement: "When they came to the house of the LORD at Jerusalem." It shows that the house still existed before the eye of God, whatever its outward condition, and even though it had been torn to the ground. So although three different temple buildings stood up to the time of the Lord, it was always the same house in the mind of God… God seems to have used the ruin of His sanctuary to touch the hearts of these leading men. When they came to the LORD's house and saw its condition, it moved them, and they "offered freely" of what they owned. The Spirit of God is careful to note it, setting His seal of approval on the act: "they gave according to their ability."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The measure is ability, not a set fraction

No law fixes the amount. The standard is what each person has, and one commentator carries it straight into Christian practice:

They were faithful in their giving — not according to the Law, the tenth part, but according to their ability. And the New Testament states the rule for the Church about giving in 1 Corinthians 16:2: "On the first day of every week, each of you is to put something aside and store it up, as he may prosper."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A small sum, highly valued

Measured against Israel's past, the total is thin. Measured against the givers' poverty, it is large — and God measures it the second way:

In verses 68 and 69 we find a second mark of these returned exiles: zeal for the building of the house of God. It is the devotion that sacrifices its own interests for the work of the Lord. The leading fathers willingly give a sum worth about two and a half million francs. This was little indeed compared with what the leading fathers had once offered for the building of Solomon's temple (1 Chr. 29:6-9). But in a time of extreme poverty this gift had great value in the eyes of the Lord of the temple. He owns all the treasures of the universe, and He valued this gift by the zeal that prompted them to offer it. In the same way He later valued the widow's small coins above the surplus of the rich.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Readiness is what makes a gift a gift

Ability sets the amount, so the willing heart becomes the real measure:

Grace refuses all compulsion, but it values, encourages and directs readiness of mind: without this, what is giving worth? Is the gift acceptable? Or the giver? But if the readiness is there, a person is accepted according to what he has, not according to what he does not have. Sentiment disappears; reality takes its place.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sight. These leaders arrived at ruins that God still called His house. Seeing it opened their hands.

- Freedom. No one forced the gift. A real interest in the things of God shows up in His work.

- Measure. They gave by ability, not by a legal tenth. The New Testament sets the same rule: each one lays aside as he prospers.

- Heart. Without a willing mind, giving is worth nothing. With it, a person is accepted by what he has, not by what he lacks.

- Value. The gift was tiny beside Solomon's day. Still, the Owner of all treasure prized it, as He prized the widow's small coins above the surplus of the rich.

Ezra 2:70 · Darby

And the priests, and the Levites, and [some] of the people, and the singers, and the doorkeepers, and the Nethinim dwelt in their cities, and all Israel in their cities.

Chapter 2 ends quietly. After the long lists of names and numbers, everyone goes home to his own town. Does that settling show grace restoring a people to their inheritance, or the first hint that private comfort came before the house of God?

Small Settlements, Real Testimony

Only a small group came back from exile. One writer sees God's hand in the fact that they filled the towns at all:

Not all of those who returned to Judah worked at rebuilding the temple. For the most part the priests and Levites, some of the people, the gatekeepers and Nethinim lived in their cities. The temple would have had little significance if there were no residents in any of the cities of Judah. The numbers in the cities would be small compared with their size before the captivity. Yet each city would be a testimony to the restoring grace of God. Today also, each little assembly that God restores is a testimony to His grace and faithfulness. But such testimonies give us no reason for pride. We thank God for His goodness, and our own weakness only humbles us.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Or a Cooling of Zeal

Commentators differ here. Another writer reads the same sentence as a warning sign, and points to Haggai 1:

The spiritual reader may well ask about this record, especially when it is read in the light of what happened afterwards, as told in Haggai 1. Is it not a symptom of the decay of their first energy? Does it not reveal the tendency to think of themselves and their own houses before the interests of the Lord's house. Solomon spent thirteen years building his own house, and only seven on the temple. Knowing what man is, it is not surprising if the restored remnant began by first minding their own things.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Missing Levites

The verse names priests and Levites together. But only seventy-four Levites came back, and one writer explains why:

There was no lack of people, as we shall see in Ezra 8. But on their part there was indifference, spiritual laziness, and no doubt love of their own comfort. So only seventy-four people present themselves to escort the priests, the people, and their chiefs! … Those who have received gifts from the Lord for evangelising, teaching, and feeding the flock of Christ are afraid. They will not go forward with the strength He gives them, or exercise their ministry as the Lord has entrusted it to them.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Temple Servants — the "Given" Ones

The verse's last group has a name worth knowing. Older translations leave it as "Nethinim"; the ESV says "temple servants":

The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, to God. … According to Ezra 8:20 this order originated with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites, whom Joshua appointed as helpers to the Levites (Joshua 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God assigned to certain duties in the temple.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Yet God records their family names too:

These modest functions are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly registers all the names of their fathers. In the same way today, the Lord forgets none of it — serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, taking care of the "upper room."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Scattered Homes, One Gathering

The verse ends with all Israel in their separate towns. The next chapter shows them together again (older translations read "cities" where the ESV has "towns"):

The end of the previous chapter states that all lived in their cities — "and all Israel in their cities." Then came the important seventh month (Tishri), with its holy gathering. … The remnant gathered "as one man to Jerusalem." … This gathering "as one man to Jerusalem" reminds us of that other gathering in Jerusalem centuries later, "when they were all together in one place" (Acts 2:1). … Whenever God's people let the Spirit of God show His power unhindered among them, the result is always to bring them together. The Spirit of God never divides, but unites.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace settles them. They reach their own towns because God brought them back. Every small, half-empty city is a testimony to His restoring grace.

- Grace names them. The list records priests, singers, gatekeepers and temple servants alike. The Lord forgets no service, however humble.

- Grace devotes them. "Nethinim" means given. The last group in the list carries a name of dedication to God.

- Grace outruns them. Only seventy-four Levites came home; indifference and love of comfort kept the rest away, and workers are still missing today.

- Grace gathers them. Living in many towns did not scatter them. The next chapter finds them gathered as one man, for God's Spirit never divides but unites.

Ezra 3:1 · Darby

And when the seventh month came, and the children of Israel were in the cities, the people gathered together as one man to Jerusalem.

The exiles have finished the long road home and settled into their own towns. Then, at a set time, they all leave home again and travel to one city. Why that month, why that city, and why does the whole crowd move like a single person?

The month that set the date

This was not a burst of enthusiasm. The calendar explains it. The day named here was already fixed in the law as a summons:

In the book of Numbers we read, "On the first day of the seventh month you shall have a holy convocation. You shall not do any ordinary work, and it shall be a day for you to blow the trumpets." (Num. 29:1) This feast of trumpets pictured in advance the restoration of Israel in the last days. So the people showed true spiritual perception when they gathered in Jerusalem at this time. That perception, together with their perfect unity, showed that both they and their leaders had been taught by God, and were under the power of His word.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The same date carried a second picture. The month opened with a new moon, and one writer sees the returned people in that thin crescent:

Israel had lost divine blessing through their own fault. The people should have reflected the light of the glory of the Lord, just as the moon reflects the sun, but that light had disappeared. Now the new moon, an image of the restored people, had begun to reappear. The full splendour of this light was not yet visible. But this first quarter moon pointed forward to the future showing of the glory of the people of God. What feast could have suited the moment better?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

As one man

The phrase means more than a large crowd. Commentators trace this oneness back to a single cause:

This gathering "as one man to Jerusalem" reminds us of that other gathering in Jerusalem centuries later "when they were all with one accord in one place" (Acts 2:1)... Whenever God's people let the Spirit of God work His power unhindered among them, He always brings them together. The Spirit of God never divides, but unites.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Such oneness is rare, and no one can manufacture it:

Only seldom in the history of God's people has such oneness appeared. No general agreement can produce it. It comes only when all alike submit together to the power of the Spirit through the truth.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

To Jerusalem — and nowhere else

They had just settled in their cities, yet they travelled. Worship had one appointed place:

The remnant gathered "as one man" in the only city in the world that God had chosen. It was the only place where they could take up their long silent, unstrung harps again and worship Israel's God! In Babylon they might pray with the window open toward Jerusalem, and confess their sins. But they could not worship Him there.

Modernised from F. G. PattersonOriginal wording

Unity meant a shared journey, not just a shared opinion:

The distance of their cities does not stop them from coming to the altar at Jerusalem, and nowhere else, to show this unity.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The altar before the wall

What they did on arrival showed what they valued. Enemies were near, yet they built no wall first:

Here it was the harvest month, the final one of the Lord's feasts, but it was only a little witness... Had the God of Israel not been before their eyes, they would not have gathered in this way. Human prudence would have hurried to put up a wall against their enemies. Faith and reverence led them to build the God of Israel's altar.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The pattern for small companies

Writers apply the scene to gatherings today, and to any group that feels too few to count:

It is the same today at the Lord's table. Like the altar of the remnant, it shows the unity of the people of God, expressed in "one loaf" in which all share. It mattered little that the Jews were few in number. It matters little if we are only two or three. The altar set up in the middle of the court expressed the unity of all the people. For them, the question was not whether others would follow their example. They had the will of God, announced by Moses, as the basis for their action. The Word bound them; their gathering was an act of obedience. Is it not the same when the saints gather around the memorial of the cross of Christ, the blessed place where the Lamb of God was offered up: the Lamb that was slain, whom we worship, as such, in glory?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Summoned. The seventh month opened with God's appointed day of trumpets, a picture of Israel's restoration. The gathering began with His calendar, not their planning.

- Gathered. "As one man" is the work of the Spirit, as at Pentecost. Such unity comes when all alike bow to the truth. Agreement alone never produces it.

- Centred. They could pray in Babylon but not worship there. One place drew them, and distance was no excuse to stay away.

- Worshipping. Prudence would have built a wall first. Faith built the altar first. A small, weak company put God's claim ahead of its own safety.

- Repeatable. Being few is no barrier. Two or three bound by God's Word, gathered around the memorial of the cross, express the same unity as the whole restored people.

Ezra 3:2 · Darby

Then stood up Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and his brethren the priests, and Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and his brethren, and built the altar of the God of Israel, to offer up burnt-offerings on it, as it is written in the law of Moses the man of God.

A priest and a governor stand in a ruined city, and their first joint act is to rebuild an altar. Not a wall, not a house, not even the temple — so commentators ask two questions: why the altar first, and why the verse points back to what Moses wrote.

Priest and prince build together

The verse names a priest and a governor, and gives the altar a purpose.

At least they could build the altar of God, which showed that their relationship with God rested on sacrifice. We too can have no relationship with God apart from the sacrifice of Christ at Calvary. That sacrifice is therefore the basis of true worship. Jeshua the high priest, son of Jozadak, and his brothers the priests joined with Zerubbabel the governor, son of Shealtiel, and his brothers, who were lesser rulers in Judah. Together they rebuilt the altar so that they could offer burnt offerings to the Lord. The burnt offering was the most important of all the offerings. It speaks of the glory God receives from the value of the sacrifice of Christ. They also cared that they did this in line with what Moses, the man of God, had written years before.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Their weakness did not empty their offices of meaning.

Joshua and Zerubbabel stood at the head of those left of Judah and Benjamin. When they returned to Jerusalem, their condition was one of deep humiliation. They were weak representatives of the priesthood and of royalty. Yet at the same time they were forerunners, pictures, of the Messiah in His future glory.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The altar before the wall

Notice what they did not start with.

It is not that they began with the wall. That stands out all the more because another book, Nehemiah, is devoted to building the wall. They began with God and not with themselves. They began with the great expression of acceptance before God. The altar was the link between God and His people. It was the point of contact between them, the place where they brought their offerings.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer reads their choice as a pattern for renewal today.

Their very first priority was to rebuild the altar (v. 2). Building the altar speaks of the recovery of worship. Think how empty their lives must have been in Babylon. They had no altar, no sacrifices for their God, and no worship. Here again, this is a feature of revival. God wants to restore it today to anyone who has lost the privilege of worship.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Faith, not prudence

Enemies were close, and a wall would have been the sensible first project.

Human prudence would have rushed to build a wall against their enemies. Faith and reverence led them to build the God of Israel's altar. They could not do all that Moses and Aaron did, or David and Solomon.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

One writer treats the altar itself as their defence.

The altar was re-established by faith. On one side it was the grace of God. On the other side it was faithfulness in man, who recognized Him in his difficulties as his safeguard and wall of defence. The people of God are always in their right place when they adore God and recognize Him as their security and strength.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"As it is written in the law of Moses"

Their circumstances were unlike anything Israel had known. That is exactly why the phrase matters.

Their first concern was the worship of Jehovah. They returned to God's order and did "as it is written in the Law of Moses." They did not set up something new. They returned to what God had set up before. They set the altar upon its bases — where it had been before.

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

Weakness gave them no excuse to change the rule.

They had little strength, but they kept His word and did not deny His name. It was all the more striking, because most of Israel stayed far away, scattered among the nations of the east. Godly ones had prayed in their captivity, with windows open toward Jerusalem. But there only did they build an altar, there only offer burnt offerings. Never do we hear of such worship in Babylon, never in Assyria.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A beginning that was tested

Commentators do not all read this chapter as a simple success. One looks at what came next.

Right conduct on a wrong motive must fail. In Ezra 3, we have the Jews working for God, and doing it from the written word. They kept what Moses commanded (v. 2), and they did what David did (v. 10). But they failed. The adversaries of Judah came and stopped the work. The cause of failure was not in the adversaries of Judah. It was in the hearts of the people, which were set on their own things and not on the things of God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Altar first. They began with God, not with themselves. Worship came before walls, houses, and even the temple.

- Altar as link. The altar was the point of contact between God and His people, the place of acceptance and of offering.

- Altar as defence. Enemies were near, but faith built an altar instead of a wall and made it their safeguard.

- Altar as written. They invented nothing new. They set the altar back on its old bases, as Moses had written.

- Altar tested. A right start still needed a right motive. The work later stalled, and one writer traces the cause to the builders' own hearts.

Ezra 3:3 · Darby

And they set the altar on its base; for fear was upon them because of the people of the countries; and they offered up burnt-offerings on it to Jehovah, the morning and evening burnt-offerings.

A small group has come back from exile to a ruined Jerusalem — no wall, no army, no temple, and hostile neighbours all around. The first thing they build is an altar, and the reason the verse gives is fear.

Fear That Runs the Right Direction

Fear can push a person toward self-protection or toward God. Here it does the second.

This is very beautiful. In a godly spirit, fear did not lead them to protect themselves by human means. Instead their heart turned to the Lord, and to the altar of acceptance they enjoyed through Him. Their first thought was the Lord; they brought Him in between themselves and their trouble from the enemy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Altar Before Wall

The order of what they built matters.

It is not that they began with the wall. This is all the more remarkable because another book of the Bible is devoted to building the wall — the book of Nehemiah. But they began with God and not with themselves. They began with the great expression of acceptance before God. The altar was the link between God and His people — the point of contact, so to speak, between them — the place where they made their offerings... this is all the more striking because the reason given is that fear was on them, and that fear led them to God and not to themselves or to other men.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer puts the principle in a single line.

If we set up our altar, it will serve for walls.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Set in Its Place

The altar was not put wherever was convenient. It went back on its own base. The verse before says they built it "as it is written in the Law of Moses the man of God."

Despite their fear of the opposition to the true worship of God, they set the altar on its bases. They established their worship on the true basis of the Word of God, not hiding this from the eye of the enemy.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Morning and Evening

These offerings were not a one-off ceremony.

They presented their burnt offerings morning and evening. When it was first given, this was called the "continual burnt offering" (Exodus 29:38-46), and because of it God had been able to dwell among His people. His presence might no longer be among them, and He might no longer dwell between the cherubim over the mercy seat. Still, the power of the burnt offering remained. As long as faith brought this and presented it to God morning and evening, the people stayed under the Lord's protection as before. They were as safe as in the days when Jerusalem in her glory stood behind fortified walls and defences — in fact, far safer.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Another writer notes which offering this was, and how long it was to run.

It was not the sacrifice for sin, but the burnt offering, the true image of worship. The people were to keep offering it, without any interruption, until the temple was finished.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

One Altar, One People

The altar also answered a question about the group itself: what made them one people?

It made no difference that the Jews were few in number. It makes no difference if we are only two or three. Some of the people had returned from captivity. Others were still scattered along the rivers of Babylon, or in unknown cities of Persia and Media. The altar, set up in the middle of the court, expressed the unity of them all. For them the question was not whether others would follow their example. They had the will of God, announced through Moses, as the basis for what they did.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What the Altar Pointed To

Why the altar first, and not the temple? Because of what the altar and its offerings stand for.

First they obeyed His Word. They set up the altar for worship and for coming to God in the appointed way. Then they trusted Him to keep them among their enemies. The altar and the burnt offerings morning and evening are pictures of Christ, who is both the altar and the burnt offering. Whenever the Spirit of God sends a true recovery and revival, He will put the Lord Jesus Christ and His finished work first.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Fear first. The danger was real. It did not send them to build defences; it sent them to God.

- Altar first. They began with God, not with themselves. The altar was the meeting point between the Lord and His people, and it went up before any wall.

- Word first. They rebuilt the altar on its own base, as the Law of Moses directed. Their worship rested on God's Word, in full view of the enemy.

- Christ first. The altar and the morning-and-evening offerings picture Christ. In every true recovery, His finished work comes first.

- Shelter last, and best. With the offering still rising, a people with no walls were safer than the old fortified city. Set up the altar, and it will serve for walls.

Ezra 3:4 · Darby

And they held the feast of tabernacles as it is written, and [offered] daily burnt-offerings by number, according to the ordinance, as the duty of every day required;

The exiles were fresh back from Babylon. The temple was not yet rebuilt, and enemies surrounded them. Still, this small company sat down to keep a festival of joy. Two things stand out. They measured their worship by what was already written. And they kept it up day by day, by number, before any building stood to house it.

The Written Word as the Only Rule

The phrase "as it is written" appears twice in this chapter. Their circumstances were nothing like the days of Moses or Solomon. Still, they went back to the original instructions.

As we begin to read the third chapter, a fourth feature of true revival is plainly shown: obedience to the Word of God. In verse 2, and again in verse 4, we find the words 'as it is written'. Their first recorded action, when back in their land, was to approach their God in the way He had laid down at the first... yet they recognised that what God may lay down at the start of His dispensations stands unchanged to the finish.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

That meant leaving behind the habits picked up during seventy years away from Jerusalem.

Whatever they had practised in Babylon, whatever their traditional rites and customs had been, they left it all behind in the place of their captivity. Now, delivered and brought back, nothing could satisfy them short of the authority of the written Word.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Worship Before the Building

They kept the feast before anyone had laid the temple foundation. Hole sees that order as deliberate.

They began with the burnt offering, which lay at the basis of all God's dealings with them. The seventh month had come, so they observed the feast of tabernacles, which fell at that time. This they did though the foundation of the temple had not been laid. The burnt offerings very rightly came before the 'house'.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Enemies surrounded them. What they built first shows what they trusted.

Human prudence would have hurried to put up a wall against their enemies. Faith and reverence led them to build the God of Israel's altar. They could not do all that Moses and Aaron did, or David and Solomon... The burnt offering was the constant expression of approach to Him through an unblemished sacrifice, when everything given to the fire rose up acceptably before Him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Daily, By Number, As Each Day Required

The verse does not stop at the feast. It counts out offerings for each separate day.

So there was no weariness of it: it was no passing act. There was the daily offering. This is a very important thing... It always makes me unhappy to see God's children merely putting in an appearance on the Lord's Day morning — merely keeping up an outward link with the Lord and with His people. I admit there may be circumstances where it cannot be otherwise... but as a general rule, the same faith that makes us value coming together to meet the Lord at His own table ought to make us rejoice to meet the Lord on every occasion, and to grow in the truth by every means.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Feast Itself Pictured

The feast came at the close of harvest and vintage.

Israel dwelt in booths during the feast, in remembrance of their having lived in tents when brought out of Egypt... It was at the end of their harvest and vintage, when they enjoyed the fruits of God's goodness. The feast prefigures the millennium, when the people will enter into full blessing.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Keeping a feast of joy among ruins looks absurd until you see what carried them.

To human eyes looking at their desolate condition it might have seemed a mockery for these poor returned captives to be keeping a joyful feast. But faith is "the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen," and so brings the future into the present. And once the soul stands before God in all the acceptance of Christ, pictured by the burnt offering, it already holds the certainty of every promised blessing, secured in Him.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A Feast Rarely Kept

This verse holds a distinction in Israel's history that is easy to miss.

The feast of tabernacles was above all a time of rejoicing. But the only time we read of it being celebrated in the Old Testament is here in Ezra 3:4, after the remnant had returned from captivity.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Written. Everything began with "as it is written" — not with new arrangements to suit their reduced circumstances.

- Altar. Worship came before walls and before the temple foundation. The burnt offering came first, then the house.

- Daily. They counted out offerings for each day. The recovery lasted; it was not one burst of enthusiasm.

- Joy. They kept a feast of gladness among ruins. Faith treats promised blessing as already secure in Christ.

- Forward. The feast pictures the coming age of full blessing for Israel. Its only Old Testament record is here, kept by a small, obedient remnant.

Ezra 3:5 · Darby

and afterwards the continual burnt-offering, and those of the new moons, and of all the set feasts of Jehovah that were consecrated, and of every one that willingly offered a voluntary offering to Jehovah.

The exiles are home in a ruined Jerusalem, and their first move is not to build but to restore the altar and its sacrifices. So why did worship come first, and what does an uncommanded gift add to a schedule God Himself fixed?

The continual burnt offering

The daily sacrifice here was never meant to stop. Its subject is one thing: a life given up to God in death. One writer explains what it meant, and what it secured:

Its meaning is His devotedness to death. In the place of sin and for God's glory, He proved His obedience to the very end, even to being made sin for His people. So the altar consumed it all, and it went up as a sweet aroma to the Lord. This offering never stopped. By it God laid a foundation on which Israel could stand, accepted in all its fragrance. It becomes a clear picture of the believer's position, and shows the ground of his acceptance in the Beloved.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The word "continual" carries weight here. What the returned people started, they kept up:

There was no weariness of it: it was no passing act. There was the daily offering. This is a very important thing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the new moon matters here

The month they started in carried its own message. The moon has no light of its own, and it pictures Israel here:

Israel had lost divine blessing through their own fault. The people ought to have reflected the light of the glory of the Lord, just as the moon reflects the sun. That light had gone out. But now the new moon, an image of the restored people, had begun to reappear. Its full splendour was not yet visible. Yet this first quarter moon pointed ahead to the coming display of the glory of the people of God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Nothing invented, everything written

Every item in this verse was already written down. What the exiles had practised in Babylon did not come home with them:

The striking feature of all their proceedings was that they now ordered everything according to the word of God. Whatever they had practised in Babylon, whatever their old rites and customs had been, they left it all behind in the land of their captivity. Now, delivered and brought back, nothing could satisfy them short of the authority of the written Word.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The freewill offering

The verse does not end with the calendar. It ends with people who simply wanted to give:

The record does not note only the new moons and the set feasts. It adds, "and the offerings of everyone who made a freewill offering to the LORD." When God's Spirit is acting in power, He fills the hearts of many of His people to overflowing. The vessel cannot hold the blessing, and it runs over in thanksgiving and praise to God. This is the secret both of devotedness and worship.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Worship prompted by a recent kindness fades with the memory of it. A voluntary gift is different:

When the soul goes out to God in a voluntary act of worship, that worship comes from a larger measure of spiritual energy. It is more than worship that only springs from some special mercy felt at the time. But where the Holy Spirit leads the heart out in some voluntary or deliberate expression of praise, it will be of a more lasting character.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

God's response, and the warning

God watched all of it, and He credits what His own grace produced:

It was welcome to the heart of God to see His people return to Himself. They owned His claims and the only ground of their acceptance. It shows us how much notice He takes of what His own people do, and that He takes pleasure in their approach and worship. Producing these fruits by His grace in their hearts, with the same grace He puts them to their account.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Yet the altar was only a start. A right beginning can become a resting place:

In faith they built and used the altar without delay, and that was good. It was better still to lay the foundation, and not to settle for that beginning — informal, yet acceptable and right.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Continual — the daily burnt offering pictures Christ's devotedness to death. It never stopped, so the ground of the believer's acceptance never shifted.

- Written — the exiles brought no Babylonian habits home. Every offering named here was already commanded in Scripture.

- New moon — the seventh month opened with the new moon. Israel's light, long dark, had begun to reappear, with fuller glory still ahead.

- Willing — the closing clause is the overflow. When the Spirit fills a heart, the vessel cannot hold the blessing, and praise runs over.

- Onward — God credits such worship to His people. But a right beginning is not a place to stop; the foundation still had to be laid.

Ezra 3:6 · Darby

From the first day of the seventh month they began to offer up burnt-offerings to Jehovah. But the foundation of the temple of Jehovah was not [yet] laid.

The altar went up before the foundation went down

The order in this chapter is deliberate. Sacrifice began on day one; the building had not even been started.

It is interesting that the returned remnant did not first build houses for themselves. They did not build a big city wall. They did not even rebuild the temple. Their very first priority was to rebuild the altar (v. 2). Building the altar speaks of the recovery of worship. How empty their lives must have been in Babylon, without altar, without sacrifices for their God, and without worship. Again, this is a feature of revival. God wants to restore it today to anyone who has lost the privilege of worship.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

They did not wait for a building to be worshippers. What they had was enough to start.

They are quick to raise an altar to the God of Israel. They need not build their Temple first. An altar will do for burnt offerings and for the Feast of Tabernacles. They are a revived people, a people who know they are standing on holy ground again. So on that symbolic day, the first day of the seventh month, they raise their altar and begin their worship.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The day they chose to begin

The date was not accidental. The first day of the seventh month carried its own meaning for a people just back from exile.

The feast of the new moon began with the blowing of trumpets. It took place on the first day of this seventh month. The day suited the state of the people who had come back from captivity, and the grace God had shown them. Israel had lost God's blessing through their own fault. The people should have reflected the light of the glory of the Lord, just as the moon reflects the sun, but that light had disappeared. Now the new moon, a picture of the restored people, had begun to reappear. The full brightness of this light was not yet visible. But this first quarter moon pointed forward to the coming display of the glory of the people of God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Note what kind of sacrifice they began with. Rossier points out it was "not the sacrifice for sin, but the burnt offering, the true image of worship."

What the closing "but" means

Commentators differ on the tone of the last clause. One reading takes it as a mark of honest growth, not failure.

Thus, you see, there was progress there. No remnant that was ever called out by grace arrived all at once at the truth that God is going to give them. It is a matter of growth as a whole, not only individual growth. But they did not yet come to understand His mind and His word. At the beginning they cannot do what they may understand, and have power for, on a later day.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another reading hears a warning in it — a first slackening, right at the start.

The sixth verse almost seems to show some decline in spiritual energy at the very start. That has happened in every new movement of the Spirit of God. At least, the statement is very significant: But the foundation of the temple of the LORD was not yet laid.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

God's pleasure in what they did offer

Whatever the delay meant, Scripture speaks warmly of the offerings they did bring.

The record of the start of the burnt offerings on the first day of the seventh month carries clear delight. It pleased the heart of God to see His people come back to Himself, owning His claims and the only ground on which He accepted them. It shows us how closely He watches what His own people do, and that He takes pleasure when they draw near and worship. Producing these fruits by His grace in their hearts, with the same grace He puts them to their account.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Worship among the ruins

The unfinished foundation is what makes the verse useful now. Worship does not wait for the ruins to be cleared, and it lifts believers into a place the ruins cannot touch.

As in Ezra 3, the heavenly position of God's people could come back to light only by building the altar — that is, by the practice of worship. Where there is worship, the heavenly position of the Church must be understood. Believers do not have an earthly religion, like the Jewish people. Worship brings them into heaven. That stays true when everything around them is in ruin, and the Church, like the temple at the start of Ezra, is no more than a heap of rubble.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Altar first. They rebuilt worship before houses, walls or temple. Hardt calls this recovery of worship a feature of revival, open to anyone who has lost it.

- Day one. They began at the new moon, on the first day of the seventh month. It was a small returning light that promised fuller glory later.

- Not yet. Commentators read the unlaid foundation two ways: honest growth that could not do everything at once, or an early cooling of energy.

- Received. God took pleasure in the offerings they did bring, and credited fruit that His own grace had produced in them.

- Among ruins. Worship needs no finished building. Rossier says it lifts believers into heaven even while everything around them lies in ruin.

Ezra 3:7 · Darby

And they gave money to the masons and to the carpenters; and meat and drink and oil to the Zidonians and to the Tyrians, to bring cedar-trees from Lebanon to the sea at Joppa, according to the grant that they had of Cyrus king of Persia.

The altar was standing and the offerings had begun, but no one had yet laid the temple's foundation. Verse 7 records the next steps: wages for workmen, food and drink for foreign suppliers, cedar floated down the coast. It also records the king who allowed it all.

Worship first, then the building

Sacrifice came first, before any building. But the temple was not forgotten. This verse shows the people getting ready for it.

So they did not try new ideas of their own about what might be suitable. They simply went back to God's original Word. They began with the burnt offering, which lay at the basis of all God's dealings with them... This they did though the foundation of the temple had not been laid. The burnt offerings rightly came before the "house". But the house was not forgotten, as verse 7 shows. They started the preparations for it, because it was the main object of their return to the land.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Their giving did not stop at the altar.

They had made a start. They had an altar, but not yet a temple, and not even the foundation. But their generosity extended to the preparations for the building of the house as well (v.7).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The road the timber travelled

The verse traces a supply line. Workers cut cedar in the mountains of Lebanon. They tied it into rafts, floated it down the coast, and landed it at the port that served Jerusalem.

Town and sea-port in the tribe of Dan. It was the port of Jerusalem. Workers cut timber in Lebanon and brought it by sea to Joppa in rafts, for the temple at Jerusalem. 2 Chr. 2:16; Ezra 3:7.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The older wording "the sea of Joppa" is not the name of a separate body of water:

In Ezra 3:7, the meaning is "the sea at Joppa."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The same source as Solomon, on a far smaller scale

Solomon had drawn cedar from the same source when he built the first temple. The comparison cuts both ways.

...in preparation for building, they gave money to masons and carpenters, as well as food, drink and oil to the people of Sidon and Tyre... This was according to the directive of Cyrus. It was nowhere near the scale of Solomon's building of the temple (1 Kings 5:11-14), but the supplies came from the same source.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Set the two houses side by side:

Solomon built the first temple in the glory of his reign. He was a picture of the Prince of peace. He used all the resources of his mighty empire, and of the peoples who paid him tribute, to build a house where Jehovah would live among His people... But now a few weak captives were raising the house. They depended on a Gentile king for the very materials they used, and hostile tribes surrounded them.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The grant from Cyrus

The closing phrase is not a footnote. It marks the whole work with a reminder of why they were under a foreign king at all.

Here we must also note that the rebuilding of the house of God could not be separated from the testimony given to its ruin and to the ruin of the people of God. Everything the remnant did, they did "according to the grant that they had from Cyrus king of Persia" (v. 7). Their sins had put them under the nations, and they were to stay conscious of their state... A sense of our ruin should mark us today, as it marked the people in the times of Ezra. We cannot and should not deny it or shrug the burden off our shoulders. We must bear the humiliation of this ruin, and at the same time set the house of God back on its only real foundation, Christ.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Tyre's cedar and a promise still ahead

Tyre shipped this cedar. Isaiah also spoke of a coming day for Tyre, and one writer weighs whether the two connect.

After the seventy years in which Tyre lay forgotten, we read that "her merchandise and her wages will be holy to the LORD." Isa. 23:17-18. This may refer to Tyre sending cedar trees from Lebanon for the building of the second temple (Ezra 3:7). But we must look to a day still future for the prophecy to be fulfilled.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Altar — Worship came first. They restored sacrifice by God's original Word, not by ideas of their own.

- Preparation — Their giving reached past the altar. They paid masons and carpenters for a house that had no foundation yet.

- Provision — Cedar came from Lebanon by sea to Joppa, Jerusalem's port. It was the same source Solomon used, on a far smaller scale.

- Permission — Every step ran "according to the grant... from Cyrus." Their own sins had put them under the nations, and they were to own that, not shrug it off.

- Promise — Tyre's timber has been linked to Isaiah's word that Tyre's wages will be holy to the LORD. The real fulfilment still waits for a future day.

Ezra 3:8 · Darby

And in the second year of their coming to the house of God at Jerusalem, in the second month, began Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and the remnant of their brethren the priests and the Levites, and all they that had come out of the captivity to Jerusalem; and they appointed the Levites, from twenty years old and upward, to superintend the work of the house of Jehovah.

Here the returned exiles move from setting up an altar to building the temple itself. Zerubbabel and Jeshua lead the start and put the Levites over the work, which raises three questions: why the start took so long, why the age limit matters, and what this beginning would cost.

The Delay Before the Start

The altar came first; the building waited months longer. One writer sees a test of faith in that wait, and a pattern in the order of events.

We do not doubt that their faith was also tested at the beginning, for nine months passed before the work began. ... The order in this chapter is the building of the altar — that is, worship; then obedience to the Word of God; and then whole-hearted, united service for the Lord. This is the order still for God's people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another writer explains the pace. A people gathered by grace grows into the truth over time.

No remnant ever called out by grace arrived all at once at the truth God is going to give them. It is a matter of growth as a whole, not only individual growth. They did not arrive at the understanding of His mind and of His word. At the beginning they are not able to do what they may understand, and have power for, another day.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Leaders at the Front

The verse names the governor and the priest first, and that order is not accidental.

Whatever the state of the people at large, Zerubbabel and Jeshua, the governor and the priest, are foremost in the Lord's work. Officially at the head, they keep the spiritual lead of the people. It is a happy thing for God's people in any age when their leaders know the secret of the Lord's mind. Then they can call the people to follow them in His service. It is not always so. Quite often the Spirit of God acts first among His people, and the leaders in name only are then set aside, or forced to follow to keep their place.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Not Arrival, but the House

Reaching Jerusalem was not the finish line.

They did not think the whole work was finished just because they had reached Jerusalem — just because God recognised them there as Israelites. Something else was at stake: the LORD's glory... this work is for the house of the LORD, the great shared work of gathering round His name.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Appointing the Levites: God's Order Recovered

The age limit points back to a pattern Scripture had already set.

The governor and the priest know how to bring the people into the holy work alongside them... Finally, the Levites from twenty years old and upward received the task of carrying forward the work of the house of the Lord. This was plainly a return to the order set out in Scripture. It grew out of a God-given understanding of the work they were doing. Keeping God's order in the work of His house matters most of all, because it is really submission to His will as expressed in His word. To human thinking some other method might have seemed better. But the only question for the Lord's servants was, and is: what has He directed?

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

One writer reads the Levites as a picture of service given to God's people today:

In the second year of their arrival at the house of the Lord at Jerusalem, in the second month, the Levites (who, as we have seen, represent ministry for us) are established according to the mind of God, to oversee the building of the temple.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Few Hands, Enough Hands

The Levites who answered the call were a tiny group compared with earlier generations.

There were only seventy-four. In the wilderness they numbered eight thousand five hundred and eighty, and that count included only the men from thirty to fifty years old. When the Lord opened the door out of captivity, very few cared to use it. They had made a home in the land of their exile, and had forgotten Jerusalem. So the faithfulness of these seventy-four was all the more precious to the Lord. With His presence and blessing they were enough for His service as overseers of the workmen in the house of God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Opposition Arrives With the Work

The peace of the first two years ended when the building started.

Throughout the history of God's people, one thing has always held true. Whatever is God's will for the moment becomes the special target of the enemy's attack. So the returned remnant found in their day... For two years the enemy had left them in peace; but as soon as they took up their proper work, according to the will of God, the enemy raised opposition (Ezra 4).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Delay — Nine months passed before building began. The wait tested their faith, and recovery came by growth, not in one leap.

- Lead — Zerubbabel and Jeshua start the work themselves and draw the people in. Leaders who know the Lord's mind can ask others to follow.

- Order — Zerubbabel and Jeshua appoint the Levites by the pattern Scripture had set. Keeping God's order in His house is simply obeying His will.

- Few — Only seventy-four Levites came back for this work. With God's blessing they were enough.

- Cost — When the real work started, opposition started too. The enemy attacks whatever God wills now.

Ezra 3:9 · Darby

And Jeshua stood up, his sons and his brethren, Kadmiel and his sons, the sons of Judah, as one [man], to superintend the workmen in the house of God; [also] the sons of Henadad, their sons and their brethren, the Levites.

Work on the temple has begun, and this verse names the Levites who took charge of the workmen. They were very few, yet they stood "together" — so how few hands can God use, and what keeps those hands as one?

A shortage of workers

These overseers came from the smallest group among those who returned. The Levites were the family set apart for the practical care of God's house. One writer notes how thin their ranks were, and treats that shortage as a lasting pattern.

It is good to see a recovery of priestly activity among the people, as well as of the service of the Levites. But Levites always seem to be in short supply. Here we find just 74 Levites for about 4,000 priests... Those who are willing to do practical work for the benefit of the people of God are famously few. But praise the Lord there are some!

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Few, yet enough — and undivided

Seventy-four men is a tiny number. One writer says the Lord prized their faithfulness all the more, and points to what held them together.

The more precious to the Lord was the faithfulness of these seventy-four, and with His presence and blessing they were enough for His service as overseers of the workmen in the house of God. Grace had also worked in their hearts, for they stood "together," or, as the margin reads, "as one" in their office. This was true fellowship. It grew out of their communion with the mind of God about His house. His aims were their aims, so they were not held back by divided plans; "as one" they moved the workmen forward.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The same writer calls this unity the clear fruit of the Spirit of God working among them, and a good sign for the building ahead.

Why the work fell to the Levites

The leaders did not choose supervisors for convenience. They followed a pattern Scripture had already set down. They also drew the whole people into the work with them.

The leaders were foremost in the work, and associated the people with themselves in the blessed enterprise... They took hold of the work in earnest. The order in this chapter is the building of the altar for worship, then obedience to the Word of God, and then whole-hearted, united service for the Lord. This is still the order for God's people. In that work they did not ignore God's order but carefully kept it, for the Levites come first (Numbers 4; 1 Chron. 23:24).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The work they oversaw

What were these men overseeing? One writer first clears away a narrow idea of what counts as work for God.

Many souls at the present time seem to think that the only blessedness and the only thing that is to be called work is the conversion of sinners. Never was a greater mistake.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

He adds that he rejoices over every conversion. But there was a second work, and the Levites oversaw it.

But still there is another work... there is work done for the house of Jehovah, the great shared work of gathering round the name of Jehovah. That is what we find was so especially dear to Israel, and this is what they set about when they reached Jerusalem — when each one of them was in his proper place. What brought them together for work was the carrying on of that work. What kept them together was their use of this central place of the name of Jehovah, as the place that had a divine claim on their consciences and on their hearts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Few. Only seventy-four Levites returned, against about four thousand priests. Willing hands for practical work are always few.

- Enough. With God's presence and blessing, that small number was enough for the oversight He gave them.

- One. They stood "as one" because they shared God's mind about His house. Shared aims left nothing to divide them.

- Ordered. Scripture had already given this service to the Levites, so the leaders obeyed the written word instead of doing what looked practical.

- Shared. They oversaw the shared work of God's house — gathering around His name, not personal effort alone.

Ezra 3:10 · Darby

And when the builders laid the foundation of the temple of Jehovah, they set the priests in their apparel, with trumpets, and the Levites the sons of Asaph, with cymbals, to praise Jehovah according to the directions of David king of Israel.

A small group of exiles has come back from Babylon to rebuild, and as the foundation stones go down their first act is praise. So who decides how that praise is done?

A real step forward

They had already built the altar and offered sacrifices before laying a single stone of the house. One writer weighs the two acts.

It was good to build and use the altar without delay in faith. It was better to lay the foundation than to settle for that informal but acceptable and right beginning. No doubt circumstances were unusual. The Persian king held civil authority over them. Most of the people were living among the Gentiles. A new difficulty came from Gentiles brought into the land who copied Jewish forms. Yet nothing should turn faith aside from carrying out the truth — humbly, and without show.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Back to the written word

The altar had a written rule behind it. So did the singing.

It was a day of great joy and gladness. For directions about the altar, the sacrifices, and the feasts, they had gone back to the word, "as it is written in the Law of Moses the man of God." In the same way they turn to "the directions of David king of Israel" for guidance in their service of praise.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Their weakness did not lower the standard:

The children of Israel who gathered that day on Mount Moriah were few and weak. Even so, they were careful and exact in obeying the Word. They were doing the Lord's work, and they saw clearly that human thoughts and human wisdom had no place in it. The Lord and the Lord alone must set the pattern for His house.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Trumpets, cymbals, and the crowd

Each instrument belonged to a particular set of hands.

Three groups stand out in this joyful celebration. There were the priests in their robes with trumpets, and the sons of Asaph with cymbals. Beyond these were the people, who answered the praise they heard with a great shout, because the foundation of the house of the Lord was laid. Only priests were allowed to blow the sacred trumpets. It takes being in the holy place, in the presence of God, in communion with His mind, to know when to sound the notes of testimony and praise. In the same way, only the sons of Asaph — Levites, under the king's order — could use the sacred cymbals.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The old note recovered

What they sang was not new.

It has been said, and it is worth recalling, that "a remnant has the brightest features of the original." This is true. We see an example of it when the returned remnant of Israel from Babylon laid the foundation of the temple of the Lord... Then there reappeared the best features of Israel's brightest days. It was the same high note of praise that sounded out when the glory of the Lord filled the temple in Solomon's day.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Why a foundation is worth celebrating

The house was far from finished. The day still counted.

Everything was not yet accomplished, but they had recognised the basis of truth. That is a reminder of 2 Timothy 2:19, "God's firm foundation stands." When people have departed from the truth, and God stirs His people to return to Him, it is a vital encouragement to be reminded that God's firm foundation stands.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The sobering side

Commentators differ on how to read the day. One writer looks at what came next.

Conduct may go beyond faith. If it does, it will break down. Right conduct on a wrong motive must fail. In Ezra 3 we have the Jews working for God, and that from the written word... But they failed. The adversaries of Judah came and stopped the work. Looking at the outward form, we should have said, "Now here is obedience." But God's eye saw through it all... The cause of failure was not in the adversaries of Judah, but in the hearts of the people.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Foundation. Building the altar was right. Laying the foundation was better. Faith carries the truth further, even when circumstances are hard.

- Written. Written directions shaped both the altar and the singing — Moses for one, David for the other.

- Ordered. Priests had the trumpets, the sons of Asaph the cymbals, the people the shout. Each part belonged to particular hands.

- Recovered. A small group sang the note of Solomon's best days. A remnant can carry the brightest features of the original.

- Tested. Correct outward obedience is not the same as faith. The work stopped because of the people's hearts, not because of their enemies.

Ezra 3:11 · Darby

And they sang alternately together in praising and giving thanks to Jehovah For he is good, for his loving-kindness [endureth] for ever toward Israel. And all the people shouted with a great shout to the praise of Jehovah, because the foundation of the house of Jehovah was laid.

The exiles back from Babylon have laid the foundation of a second temple. Their first response is a song — the same words Israel had sung in its greatest days. (Where these writers quote "mercy," the ESV reads "steadfast love.")

Praise Arranged by the Book

The celebration was not spontaneous noise. It followed a pattern already given, and each group had its own part.

This joyful celebration marks out three groups. There were the priests in their robes with trumpets, and the sons of Asaph with cymbals. Outside of these were the people. They answered the praise they heard with a great shout, because the foundation of the house of the Lord was laid. Only priests could blow the sacred trumpets (see Num. 10). To discern when to sound the notes of testimony and praise, you have to be in the holy place, in the presence of God, in communion with His mind. So, in this arrangement, they sang responsively, praising and giving thanks to the Lord.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The same care that shaped the altar and the sacrifices shaped the singing on Mount Moriah, the temple hill.

The children of Israel who gathered that day on Mount Moriah were few and feeble. Even so, they were exact in their obedience to the Word. They were engaged on the Lord's work, and they saw clearly that human thoughts and human wisdom had no place in it. The Lord and the Lord alone must prescribe the method of His house.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Mercy, Not Merit

They could have sung about their own journey and sacrifice. They sang about God's mercy instead.

Psalm 136 says of God twenty-six times that "His mercy endures for ever." They now acknowledged this about themselves, as those who stood for Israel. It was the confession that no merit on their side had led to the revival in which they had part. It was all on the ground of God's mercy. Every revival God has granted in the sad history of Christendom has rested on the mercy of God, with no merit on our side. Let us never forget this.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

One Song Through Every Generation

These words were not new. They form a thread running from the height of the kingdom, through this day of weakness, and on to a day still ahead.

David in his day, and the whole congregation with him, proclaimed it. Solomon, with the people in unison, years later echoed it again. The returned remnant, in all their weakness, gave expression to it when the foundations of the Temple were laid once more. One day, in full chorus, the people of Israel, returned and delivered at last, will confirm it. Language that suited them nearly three thousand years ago will suit Israel for ever.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The Reach of "Toward Israel"

A handful of returned exiles could have sung of mercy toward themselves. Instead they named the whole nation.

Their inward joy rises up toward its blessed source as they sing, "For His mercy endures for ever" (Ezra 3:11). Then unselfish faith adds, "toward Israel." Such faith does not limit God in His gracious dealings. It loves to count on His faithfulness toward everyone inside the relationship He has revealed.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Two Things That Survive the Ruin

Earlier in the chapter they set up the altar; now the foundation is laid. One writer sees Christ in both.

In the midst of the most complete ruin, two things remain unchanged: the work of Christ and His person. Christ is the altar and Christ is the foundation. Christ is our salvation, and Christ is the One on whom we are built forever. Christ is the object of worship and of the unceasing praise of His own. We pass through dark times. Humiliation and deserved reproach are our lot. Even so, we can sing the hymn of the future, for He has not changed. Here we see a small returned group singing the song of the glory still to come, in the midst of the desolation of their history and among the ruins of Jerusalem.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Faithfulness Answering Failure

Their own failure had brought the first house down.

Now they had come to a time of reviving. They discovered that God was faithful though they had failed. In a mighty song of triumph they celebrated that "the Lord is good and His mercy endures for ever." What a consolation this was to them; what a comfort and joy it is to us.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — mercy. The song credits nothing to the builders. Commentators read it as their confession: no merit of theirs produced the revival. Every recovery God grants rests on the same ground.

- Gift — a pattern. Praise followed David's ordinance, with priests, Levites and people each in place. A feeble company still held that the Lord alone prescribes the method of His house.

- Anchor — what never changed. Altar and foundation stood while everything else lay in ruins. One writer sees in them Christ's work and Christ's person. Praise survives the wreckage.

- Reach — "toward Israel." A small returned group sang not for itself but for the whole nation. It counted on God's faithfulness to everyone inside the relationship He has revealed.

- Result — one unbroken song. The same words ran from David to Solomon to these exiles. Writers look for Israel to sing them again in full chorus. Mercy that endures forever needs no new song.

Ezra 3:12 · Darby

But many of the priests and Levites and chief fathers, the ancient men that had seen the first house, wept with a loud voice, [when] the foundation of this house was laid in their sight; and many shouted aloud for joy.

One foundation drew two sounds from one crowd: loud weeping from men who remembered the first temple, and shouts of joy from the rest. Why the difference, and which response was right?

One event, two hearts

The laying of the foundation split the crowd along the line of memory.

It caused tears in the older men. They felt how poor the present display of the Lord's glory was among them, compared with what they had once seen. It was a source of joy to the others. They had only known the complete collapse of the Lord's name on the earth. Now their hearts were glad that at least there was a clear and definite confession of that name, as a name with the right to gather His people together — even though they were only a remnant here below. They were both right; and yet how different the expression of their hearts was! Of the two, the older men surely did feel the joy of the foundation being laid. But their sense of sorrow and humiliation for His name outweighed it. So the older men had a more subdued feeling. Both groups were led by the Lord, but in very different measures. I am persuaded that, of the two, the older men had the deeper sense of God's glory.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Tears that come from nearness

But why were the men nearest to God the ones in tears?

Yet the old men wept, for they had seen the former house, built according to God's inspired direction. Sadly, we understand this. Anyone who now thinks of what the assembly of God was at the first will understand the tears of these old men. This suited nearness to God. Further off, it was right to hear joy, or at least the confused shout that only announced the public event. For in truth God had stepped in on behalf of His people.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Both sounds welcome to God

Both cries went up to God at the same moment.

Who can doubt that both the tears and the gladness were equally acceptable to the Lord? Both may equally have been the fruit of His grace working in their hearts.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A sober note inside every revival

Do we see these tears as spoiling the day?

No, we do not. We see them as expressing another side of things, which should always be present when we are able to rejoice in some time of revival granted in the mercy of God. However blessed the revival, the memory of the beginning tempers our rejoicing. Grace and power marked those first days under the energy of the apostles, as the early chapters of the book of Acts show. We become aware how small and imperfect anything we may experience is, compared with that. It may not bring tears to our eyes, but it will have a very sobering effect on us, for our good.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Grief that does not sink into gloom

Grief over failure still needs somewhere to go.

It is the failure that causes the tears, and we must not be indifferent to it. The truth will not make us indifferent to it — the more we know it, the more deeply we shall feel the failure. But it will not depress us, for we shall turn from it to the Lord, "because He is good, for His mercy endures forever."

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

A small work, God's own purpose

What made a modest foundation worth celebrating was not its size but whose house it was.

The laying again of the temple's foundations made the people realise that though Israel had failed, God had not. His purposes and promises remained unchanged. They were a feeble band, and their work was as feeble as they were. Yet they now linked themselves with GOD, HIS PURPOSES, and HIS HOUSE. This is what we must do. Though they were only a remnant, they were able to take up sanctuary service to the Lord. They praised Him "after the ordinance of King David" — and David's day was the brightest hour of Israel's history.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Memory divides. One foundation drew tears from men who remembered the first house, and cheers from those who never saw it.

- Nearness weeps. The tears suited nearness to God. Further off, the shout still announced that God had acted for His people.

- Both accepted. Tears and gladness were equally acceptable. Both could be the fruit of God's grace in the heart.

- Grief sobers, it does not sink. Seeing how small the present work is sobers us for good. Then faith turns from the failure to the Lord, whose mercy endures forever.

- Feeble hands, unchanged purpose. Israel had failed; God had not. A feeble remnant tied to His house could still worship with the joy of David's day.

Ezra 3:13 · Darby

And the people could not discern the noise of the shout of joy from the noise of the weeping of the people; for the people shouted with a great shout, and the noise was heard afar off.

The foundation of the new temple drew two sounds from one crowd at the same moment. They blended until no one could tell them apart. Why did one act of God produce shouting in some and loud weeping in others — and which response did God accept?

One event, two sounds

Memory split the crowd. Those who wept had seen the earlier temple. Those who shouted had known only its loss. What they had seen shaped what they felt.

Why so? It was the cause of tears to the older men. They felt how poor the present expression of the Lord's glory among them was, compared with what they had once seen. It was a source of joy to the others, because they had only known the utter collapse of the name of the Lord on the earth. Now their hearts were glad that at any rate there was a distinct and decided confession of that name as entitled to gather His people together, even though they were only a remnant here below. They were both right, yet how different the expression of their hearts!... I am persuaded that, of the two, the older men had the deeper sense of God's glory.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Both sounds went up to God

Both reactions told the truth about that day. Both were welcome to God.

Joy was in His presence and acceptable. Tears confessed the truth. They gave witness to a just sense of what God had been for His people, and of the blessing they had once enjoyed under His hand... and these tears were acceptable to Him. The weeping could not be distinguished from the shout of joy. This was a truthful result: natural and sad, yet fitting in the presence of God. For He rejoices in the joy of His people, and He understands their tears.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the leaders wept

Look at who was crying. These were not the least spiritual people there.

Joy could well be unmixed in those who were still young and could not remember the past. They were present at a kind of resurrection of the people. In it they saw the marvellous intervention of the grace of God. Who would want to stop them rejoicing? But the priests, the Levites, and the chief fathers wept. They were in closer communion with God, so they were more conscious of the dishonour brought upon His name. And the old men wept because they had known better times.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

God's estimate of the two sounds was not the same as the crowd's.

Even in that hour of loud joy over the foundation laid, the old men wept. They felt the ruin and its moral causes more. God saw and cherished the tears. Men were more alive to the joy that greeted the promising act of that day. Both bore witness that the Lord is good, and His mercy is for ever. That holds true whatever the failure of His people and His righteous notice of it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

When God revives His work

The pattern did not end with that crowd.

We see those tears as expressing another side of things. That side should always be present when we are able to rejoice in a time of revival granted in the mercy of God. However blessed the revival, the memory of the grace and power that marked the beginning of things tempers our rejoicing... this, though it may not bring tears to our eyes, will have a very sobering effect upon us for our good.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Holding both together

What God heard that day, He looks for still.

This mixture of joy and loud weeping rose up before God. It was so blended that one could not tell one sound from the other, and "the sound was heard far away." In the same way, some today have at heart the building of the house of God and the laying again of its ruined foundations. Their attitude should show that a true humbling over their state cannot be separated from their joy. That joy comes from celebrating together the work and person of Christ, the only foundation of present and future blessing.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

There is somewhere for the weeping to go.

It is the failure that causes the tears, and we must not be indifferent to it. The truth will not make us indifferent to it; the more we know it, the more deeply we shall feel the failure. But it will not depress us, for we shall turn from it to the Lord, "because He is good, for His mercy endures for ever."

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Ruin — the tears came from those who remembered better days and felt the ruin and its causes.

- Mercy — the shouting came from those who had known only ruin, and who saw the grace of God at work for His people.

- Both — neither sound cancelled the other. God rejoices in the joy of His people and understands their tears.

- Depth — both groups were right, yet one writer judges the older men had the deeper sense of God's glory.

- Today — hold humbling and gladness together, and turn from the failure to the Lord, whose mercy is for ever.