And in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of Jehovah by the mouth of Jeremiah might be accomplished, Jehovah stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, and he made a proclamation throughout his kingdom, and also in writing, saying,
The book of Ezra opens with a date, a prophecy, and a foreign king. They seem unrelated until you see who holds them together. The exiles in Babylon had lost everything. Yet this verse says the deciding factor was not politics, but a word God had spoken seventy years earlier.
Commentators point out that the seventy years were not a rough guess. God fixed the term before the exile began.
Seventy years before their return, the prophet Jeremiah, who lived in the closing days of the kingdom of Judah, had foretold that judgment would overtake the nation. Because of their wickedness they would be carried off into captivity at Babylon, and their land would be left in ruins. Even so, the prophecy said that after seventy years the LORD would bring them back to their land. The book of Ezra opens in the first year of Cyrus, king of Persia — seventy years after the Captivity. At that time, so that the word of the LORD by Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus, who issued a proclamation to the people of God setting them free to return to the Land to "build the house of the LORD God of Israel."
The king in this verse was no surprise to God. God named him long before Babylon took Jerusalem.
This prophecy came long before Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem, and at least a hundred years before God called Jeremiah to his work as a prophet. So it shows that the eye and heart of God are always on His people and on their interests. It shows too that the public events of the world — the rise and fall of empires, the coming of mighty conquerors — are only the instruments of His power. Through them He works on through the governments of the world to fulfil His own purposes for His people on earth. How calmly, then, the children of God may rest amid political confusion and strife! In this way God had marked out, by the mouth of Isaiah, two hundred years before the event told in our chapter, the man He had chosen to restore His people and to build His house at Jerusalem.
Writers note that knowing the facts about God's plan is not the same as being moved by God.
But none of this was enough to bring the captives back: not these convictions of the mind (which might have nothing to do with a work of conscience or a living faith), and not even his certainty that God had chosen him as an instrument to carry out His plans (v. 2). God meant to show that it was He Himself and no other who fulfilled His Word. That is why it says: "the LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia" (v. 1).
The same phrase returns four verses later, this time about the people themselves.
It is remarkable how God works. First He "stirs up the spirit" of this pagan king, so that he passes a decree inviting the Jews to return to Jerusalem. He then stirs up the spirit of those who went (Ezra 1:5). Whatever men do, a true revival is always a work of God.
Something has changed in how God deals with His people. He now acts through the empire that rules them.
In these books God is no longer seen stepping openly into the affairs of His people. He works, as it were, behind the scenes. At the same time He recognises the new order that He Himself has set up, and He uses the Gentile kings, into whose hands He had put the rule of the earth, to carry out His purposes.
While God stirred Cyrus, an old man in Babylon was praying. One writer names the three men God used, and how each one served.
So to fulfil this promise God used Jeremiah in prophecy, Daniel in prayer, and Cyrus — a man who did not know the Lord — in providence.
What guided Daniel matters, because nothing around him looked hopeful.
He discovers "by books," not by circumstances, that God would visit His people in captivity and open a way for them to return to their land. He has just seen the king of Babylon destroyed and his empire fall. But he does not guess at the meaning of the stirring events around him, or try to draw from them conclusions that favour God's people.
Those who came back were only a small remnant. Their story is left as an example.
The Holy Spirit presents those who returned as showing the marks that a believing remnant should take on in a time of ruin. They are a very healthy example for us — an example that teaches us how we may be witnesses of God in difficult circumstances.
- Word first. Seventy years earlier God spoke through Jeremiah. Ezra 1:1 names that word as the reason anything happens at all.
- Word names. The same word had named Cyrus before his birth, so the rise of an empire was only an instrument in God's hand.
- Word stirs. Cyrus was convinced in his mind, but that was not enough. God stirred his spirit, and then the people's too.
- Word hides. From Ezra on, God is no longer seen acting in the open. He works behind the scenes through the Gentile kings.
- Word answers. Jeremiah prophesied. Daniel prayed, guided by the books and not by the news around him. Cyrus acted without knowing God — one word carried by three men.
Thus says Cyrus king of Persia All the kingdoms of the earth has Jehovah the God of the heavens given to me, and he has charged me to build him a house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah.
A Persian emperor, fresh from taking Babylon, issues a decree in the name of Israel's God — the God whose prophet had named him two centuries earlier. The verse raises two questions at once: what did Cyrus actually understand, and why does he call the LORD "the God of heaven" rather than the God of Israel?
One writer sets the prediction and its fulfilment side by side.
Open the book of Ezra, and we go back to the first year of that great king. The prophet Isaiah had mentioned him by name some two centuries before he came to the throne. If we turn to Isaiah 44:28, we read the prediction of what he would do. Ezra 1:2 records his doing what Isaiah foretold.
So the "charge" in the decree points back to a prophecy already in writing.
How powerfully Isaiah's prophecy must have struck a mind so thoughtful! No sceptics were on hand to whisper their doubts. Daniel was there too, to point him to Jeremiah. It was not policy but Jehovah that stirred up the spirit of Cyrus, as He did that of the chief fathers of the Jews. The conqueror of Babylon proclaimed a kind of jubilee to the captives — but with one stated aim: to build Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. Who but an enemy of God's word can doubt that Isaiah 44:28 was his "charge" from Jehovah?
Cyrus uses the title that runs right through this part of Scripture. It marks a change in how God dealt with His people.
God is given the distinct title "the God of the heavens" (Dan. 2:18, 37, 44). It comes again in Ezra 1:2, Ezra 5:12, Ezra 6:9-10, Ezra 7:12, 23, Neh. 1:4-5, Neh. 2:4, and also in 2 Chronicles 36:23. His people had fallen away to idols. In that state it did not suit His nature and majesty to act at their head or among them as "the Lord of all the earth." (Joshua 3:11)
Cyrus was not alone among the Persian kings in using it.
Cyrus, like the kings of Persia who followed him, hated idols. Acknowledging the God of Israel as "the God of the heavens", he insists here that "he is God" (v. 3). In the same way Artaxerxes, king of Persia, later openly declares that the Lord God of Israel is "the God of the heavens" (Ezra 7:21, 23).
Cyrus credits the LORD with giving him his empire. Does that make him a believer?
In Cyrus we do not see the power of faith, but, just as Nebuchadnezzar carried out God's work, so Cyrus is the servant of His mercy to bring the Jew back to the land. In himself he goes further than Nebuchadnezzar. He says (Ezra 1:2, etc.) that the Jehovah-God had given him the kingdoms of the earth, and a charge to build the house at Jerusalem. Whether this confession of God's sovereignty came from a saving faith is another matter. God is able to make the world confess His power and authority... The point is not what Cyrus was in himself, but his work.
A king convinced of his mission could not bring the captives home by himself.
But all this was not enough to bring the captives back. These were convictions of the mind, and they might have nothing to do with a work of conscience or a living faith. Even the assurance of being an instrument chosen to carry out God's designs (v. 2) fell short. God meant to show that it was He Himself and no other who fulfilled His Word. That is why it says: "The LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia" (v. 1). He also stirred up the spirit of the chief fathers of Judah and Benjamin and the spirit of the priests and of Levites (v. 5).
The decree does three separate things, and the commission in verse 2 is the first of them.
Three things are announced here. First, the commission Cyrus himself had received about the Lord's house. Second, his royal permission for any of the Jews to return to Jerusalem to build the temple. Third, his invitation to those Jews who would stay in his lands to join those who left, by freewill offerings toward the object they had in view.
That single purpose shaped everything that followed, including what still had to be done afterwards.
In the first instance, God delivered a remnant of His people from captivity and brought them back to the Land, under Zerubbabel, in order to build the house of the Lord (Ezra 1:2-3). But once the house was built, it became necessary to build the walls and set up the gates to guard the sanctity of the house of the Lord.
- Word. Isaiah named Cyrus some two centuries early. Verse 2 records him doing what was foretold, and his "charge" traces back to Isaiah 44:28.
- Title. "God of heaven" is the name used all through Ezra, Nehemiah and Daniel. His people had fallen away to idols, so it no longer suited Him to act among them as Lord of all the earth.
- Confession. Cyrus owns that the LORD gave him his kingdoms. Yet the writers leave open whether this was saving faith: what counts here is his work, not the man.
- Stirring. Conviction was not enough. The LORD stirred Cyrus's spirit, and then the spirits of the chief fathers, the priests and the Levites.
- House. The commission, the permission to return, and the freewill offerings all serve one aim: the house of the Lord at Jerusalem.
Whosoever there is among you of all his people, his God be with him, and let him go up to Jerusalem, which is in Judah, and build the house of Jehovah the God of Israel -- he is God -- which is at Jerusalem.
The seventy years of exile are over. A Persian king's decree opens the road home. But it names no one and commands no one. It leaves the door open to whoever will walk through it.
Cyrus was not a worshipper of Israel's God, yet his edict speaks with unusual confidence about what God had charged him to do. Commentators note how much this pagan ruler was willing to say out loud.
It was no small thing for Cyrus to acknowledge the supreme glory and power of God in this striking way. It was no small thing that he obeyed what God had commanded. It is not surprising that God should have spoken of him as "His anointed."
The proclamation as a whole holds three separate things together, and it is worth keeping them distinct.
Three things are announced here: the commission which Cyrus himself had received about the Lord's house; his royal permission for any of the Jews to return to Jerusalem in order to build the temple; and lastly, his invitation to those Jews who would stay in his territories to have fellowship with those who left, by giving freewill offerings toward the goal they had in view.
The decree singles out nobody. That silence did its own sorting work.
The proclamation did not name any person or persons who were to go to Jerusalem and build the house. Instead it threw the door open for any Jew whose heart stirred him up to go. Such a man had the assurance that he would receive generous help in the project ahead of him. Worded this way, it meant that those who responded would mostly be men of piety, whose hearts were alive to the glory of God and to the place of His Name. The more worldly-minded and selfish would prefer to stay in their comfortable homes, built up during the seventy years of captivity. They would leave the task to others who were ready to face the difficulties and hardships.
It was an invitation, not an order. So it showed what people really loved.
This proclamation became a test of the moral condition of the people of God. On one side, it raised a question. Were their affections so set on their land, their God, and the house of God that in simple faith they were ready to face trials and difficulties, opposition and reproach? Were they ready to answer to the mind of God and carry out His will? Or on the other side, did they prefer to stay in Babylon with its ease and material comforts?
The verse pauses to say whose house this is. That short phrase carries weight, and so does the practical help attached to it.
Notice, he does not give any honour to the idols of Persia, but says of the God of Israel, "he is the God" (v. 3). He also gave instructions to the neighbours of anyone concerned about taking this journey to Jerusalem. They were to "help him with silver and gold, with goods and with beasts, besides freewill offerings for the house of God that is in Jerusalem" (v. 4). This was not only a matter of setting slaves free, but of enriching them. So Cyrus was rightly representing a God of grace.
The goal here is a building project, and a narrow one. The ruined city walls are not yet on the agenda.
What Cyrus had in view was the building of "the house of the LORD," and he was not concerned with the desolate state of the city. Later, Nehemiah became deeply concerned about the ruined and desolate condition of Jerusalem. He obtained permission from Artaxerxes to restore and build the city. It was a case of God's house first, the city where men dwell second. This is a principle of lasting significance.
The ones who answered were a minority, and their reasons were not practical ones.
Not everyone was ready to go back; only a small remnant was willing. The great majority preferred to stay in Babylon. There was nothing to attract them to Jerusalem — a city of ruins, with the once magnificent temple in ruins. Those who returned loved Jerusalem, the place the LORD had chosen. There, and nowhere else, the people could bring the appointed offerings and sacrifices. They belonged to those who sat by the rivers of Babylon and wept when they remembered Zion. They said, "If I forget you, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its skill! Let my tongue stick to the roof of my mouth, if I do not remember you, if I do not set Jerusalem above my highest joy!" (Ps. 137:5-6).
Writers read the open-ended question of this verse as one that has never been withdrawn.
In a sense, King Cyrus is still alive. The same call still goes out. Who is there among you? Who is there who is not content with Babylon? Who is there who values Jerusalem? Who is there who takes an interest in the house of God?
- Charged — Cyrus did not worship the God of Israel, yet he acknowledged His glory and power and obeyed what God had commanded. God called him "His anointed."
- Opened — The decree names no one and drafts no one. It opens the door to "whoever is among you of all his people."
- Tested — An invitation, not an order, exposes the heart: comfort in Babylon, or the trouble and reproach of going up.
- Built — The stated object is the house of the LORD, not the city walls. God's house comes first; the city where people live comes second.
- Answered — Only a small remnant went up. They loved Jerusalem more than comfort, and the same call still asks who will go.
And whosoever remains in any place where he sojourns, let the men of his place help him with silver, and with gold, and with goods, and with beasts, besides the voluntary offering for the house of God which is at Jerusalem.
Cyrus's decree does not stop with permission to leave; its final clause turns to the people who will stay behind and tells them to fund the ones who go. It names two kinds of gift: supplies for the traveller, and a voluntary gift for the house of God. So who really has a share in this work?
The verse ends a proclamation that moves outward in three stages: the king, the willing, and those who stay. One writer sets out the structure:
Three things are announced here. First, the commission Cyrus himself had received about the Lord's house. Second, his royal permission for any of the Jews to return to Jerusalem to build the temple. Last, his invitation to the Jews who would remain in his lands: they could have fellowship with those who left, by freewill offerings towards the object they had in view.
So the Jew who stays behind — "in whatever place he sojourns" — is not excused. He is invited into the same purpose as the man who travels.
Cyrus lets the captives go, but not empty-handed. He tells their neighbours to send them off with silver, gold, goods and beasts. One writer sees the God behind the king's words:
Notice, he does not give any honour to the idols of Persia, but says of the God of Israel, "He is God" (v. 3). He also told the neighbours of anyone concerned about this journey to Jerusalem to assist him "with silver and gold, with goods and with beasts, besides freewill offerings for the house of God that is in Jerusalem" (v. 4). This was not only a matter of liberating slaves, but enriching them. So Cyrus rightly represented a God of grace.
Note the distinction the verse itself draws. The silver and beasts help the man; the freewill offering is for the house.
Verse 5 describes those whose spirit God stirred to go up. Verse 4 speaks to everyone else. The two verses fit together as one arrangement:
Those whose spirits were raised up were to go up (v. 5). Others who would not go up themselves are told to support them with material help (v. 4). It is beautiful to read that they did so (v. 6).
And they did give. Far more stayed than went, yet the record keeps their generosity, not their reluctance.
The offer was open to all, yet the response was thin. One writer contrasts the motives of the two groups without excusing either:
But not all were ready to go back; only a small remnant was willing. The great majority preferred to remain in Babylon. There was nothing to attract them to Jerusalem — the city of ruins, with the once magnificent temple in ruins. Those who returned loved Jerusalem, the place the LORD had chosen. Only there could they bring the appointed offerings and sacrifices… And the Jews who remained helped them generously in every way.
The same work of God appears in three very different people: a foreign emperor, the families who travelled, and the neighbours who paid. Nobody organised it:
In this chapter we have all the signs of a genuine work of God. A shared heart and purpose is produced in all concerned. It appears in Cyrus, without whose permission the captives could not have returned. It appears in the leading fathers of Judah and Benjamin, who were needed for the actual work of building. It appears in those who remained, who had fellowship with their brothers through their freewill offerings and so contributed towards the necessary expenses. There were no preliminary meetings to arrange things and reach agreement. The union of heart and purpose was produced only by the action of the Lord on the hearts of all alike. This distinguishes a divine work from a human one, and is the sure proof of a real working of the Spirit of God. Every needed instrument comes forward at the right moment, for the work is of God, and it must be accomplished.
Both the journey and the gift served one object:
To build the house of God, a remnant had been set free from the corruptions of Babylon and brought back to God's land… Those who remained in captivity were urged to help with a "freewill offering for the house of God that is in Jerusalem."
- Stirred — the same God who moved Cyrus to write the decree moved the families to travel and the neighbours to give. No meeting arranged it. That agreement marks a work as God's, not man's.
- Freed — release from Babylon came with silver, gold, goods and beasts. The captives were not only set free but enriched. A foreign king's words showed a God of grace.
- Sent — only a small remnant went; the majority stayed. A city of ruins attracts nobody but those who love the place God has chosen.
- Shared — the one who stayed still had a part: he supplied the traveller and added a freewill offering. Fellowship in the work reached further than the road to Jerusalem.
- Built — help for the man and a gift for the house are two different things here. Both served one object: the house of God in Jerusalem.
And the chief fathers of Judah and Benjamin rose up, and the priests, and the Levites, even all those whose spirit God had stirred, to go up to build the house of Jehovah which is at Jerusalem.
Cyrus opened the door with a decree, but an open door moves nobody through it. Verse 5 records a second work, done inside the hearts of the leaders, priests and Levites, and it answers one question: what makes a small group leave a settled exile to rebuild a ruin?
The same phrase covers the Persian king in verse 1 and the returning families here. A decree, even a sincere one, could not produce a return by itself.
These were intellectual convictions, which might have nothing to do with a work of conscience or a living faith. Cyrus was even sure he was an instrument chosen to carry out God's purposes (v. 2). But all this was not enough to bring about the restoration of the captives. God intended to show that it was He Himself and no other who fulfilled His Word. That is why it says: "The LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia" (v. 1). He also stirred up the spirit of the heads of the fathers' houses of Judah and Benjamin. And He stirred up the spirit of the priests and the Levites (v. 5).
One writer draws the general rule out of these two stirrings.
It is remarkable how God works. First He "stirs up the spirit" of this pagan king, so that he passes a decree inviting the Jews to return to Jerusalem. He then stirs up the spirit of those who did so (1:5). Whatever men do, a true revival is always a work of God.
The verse names Judah and Benjamin, plus the priests and the Levites. That list is exact.
First, note that the heads of the fathers' houses who offered themselves for the work came from two tribes: Judah and Benjamin. There were also Levites, but they did not count as a tribe, for Levi had "no portion or inheritance with his brothers. The LORD is his inheritance" (see Deuteronomy 10:8-9). This and other Scriptures make it plain that only these two tribes were restored. Some people from other tribes may have come as well.
The stirring had one object, and the decree of Cyrus had the same one.
The object of the people's return concerned the building of the house of the Lord. This was the subject of the proclamation of Cyrus, whom God raised up for this very purpose... And for this end God worked in the hearts of those who were made willing to return to the land of their fathers.
God was not only at work inside these people.
Verse 5 of the first chapter shows a real work of God in the souls of many, including leaders both civil and religious. It led them to seize at once the opportunity given for a return to the land of their fathers, and to re-establish the worship of God by rebuilding His house. In God's providence Cyrus himself promoted this. A providential work of God in the surrounding world matched the spiritual work of God in the souls of His people.
The stirring reached only a minority.
But not all were ready to go back; only a small remnant was willing. The great majority preferred to remain in Babylon. There was nothing to attract them to Jerusalem — the city of ruins, with the once magnificent temple in ruins. Those who returned loved Jerusalem, the place the LORD had chosen.
The agreement reached further than the travellers.
Agreement of heart and object is produced in all concerned: in Cyrus, without whose permission the captives could not have returned; in the heads of the fathers' houses of Judah and Benjamin, who were needed for the actual work of building; and in those who stayed behind, who shared with their brothers through their freewill offerings and helped cover the necessary costs. Nobody held preliminary meetings to arrange matters and reach an agreement. The action of the Lord on the hearts of all alike, and nothing else, produced this union of heart and purpose. This distinguishes a divine work from a human one, and is the sure proof of a real action of the Spirit of God. Every needed instrument therefore comes forward at the right moment, for the work is of God, and it must be accomplished.
- Stirred, twice. God moved a pagan king to open the door. Then He moved His own people to walk through it, since the decree alone could not restore anyone.
- Stirred for a purpose. God stirred hearts with one object: to go up and build the house of the LORD in Jerusalem.
- Stirred inside and outside. God did a real work in the souls of civil and religious leaders, and arranged the world outside them to match.
- Stirred, but few. Only a small remnant responded. The majority preferred Babylon, since a ruined city held nothing to attract them.
- Stirred, therefore united. Agreement between king, travellers and givers came with no prior arrangement. That is the mark of a work that is God's, and such work must be finished.
And all they that were about them strengthened their hands with articles of silver, with gold, with goods, and with beasts, and with precious things, besides all that was willingly offered.
Cyrus had just issued his decree, and the families God stirred were packing to leave Babylon for Jerusalem. Their neighbours paid for the journey — which raises two questions: who moved these givers, and what does it mean to fund a work you are not joining?
The decree spoke to two groups: those who would go, and those who would stay and help pay.
Those whose spirits were raised up were to go up (v. 5). Verse 4 tells others, who would not go up themselves, to support them with material help. It is beautiful to read that they did so (v. 6).
The decree asked for these gifts, but the decree is not what produced them.
Next, God worked in the hearts of the neighbours of those who devoted themselves to the work of the Lord's house. They "offered willingly," as the proclamation had asked, out of their own property. They helped them with vessels of silver and gold, and so on.
Notice what is missing from the chapter. Nobody called a meeting to arrange any of this.
We have here, in this chapter, all the signs of a genuine work of God. Everyone concerned comes to the same heart and purpose. Cyrus agrees, and without his permission the captives could not have returned. The heads of the families of Judah and Benjamin agree, and the actual building work needed them. Those who stayed behind agree, and they shared with their brothers by their freewill offerings and so contributed towards the necessary expenses. There were no meetings beforehand to arrange things and reach agreement. The Lord alone produced this union of heart and purpose, working on the hearts of all alike. This is what marks off a divine work from a human one, and it is the sure proof of a real working of the Spirit of God. Every needed instrument comes forward at the right moment, because the work is of God and it must be accomplished.
God's people did not leave Babylon empty-handed. Their neighbours could have despised them for going. Instead they filled their hands.
This was not only a matter of freeing slaves, but of enriching them. So Cyrus was rightly representing a God of grace.… People near those who intended to go were willing to help them as Cyrus had directed. They gave silver and gold, goods and livestock, and precious things — that is, things of special value (v. 6). This shows at least that those so concerned about going to Jerusalem had not earned the contempt of the people among whom they lived.
The open wording of the decree did more than invite volunteers. It sorted them.
The proclamation did not name any person or persons who were to go to Jerusalem and build the house. It threw the door open to any Jew whose heart stirred him to go, and promised him generous help in the project ahead of him. Worded like this, it meant that those who responded would mainly be men of piety, whose hearts were alive to the glory of God and to the place of His Name. The more worldly and selfish would be inclined to stay in the comfortable homes they had built during the seventy years of captivity. They would leave the task to others who were ready to face the difficulties and hardships.
Older translations say "strengthened their hands… with precious things." The ESV has "aided them… with costly wares." One writer turns those older words into a question for us.
In the wonderful day of recovery pictured in Ezra we see men of Judah and men of Benjamin concerned about building God's house. Their names remind us of the praises of God and of the Son of His right hand. Priests, Levites, and all whose spirits God had raised strengthened their hands with, among other blessed features, "precious things." Beloved, have our hearts not been "raised" (or "stirred," J.N.D.) by the truth that has been recovered to us in our day?… What strengthening of hands should be ours! Outwardly it is a day of smallness and weakness. Inwardly we are strong in affection and loyalty to Christ as we know and enjoy these "precious things" in the power of the Spirit.
- Stirred. God moved Cyrus. He moved the families who went. He moved the neighbours who paid. The offering was His work before it was theirs.
- Shared. Those who stayed home still had a share in the work. Their gifts were their real part in it.
- Sign. King, builders and givers agreed, and nobody called a meeting. That unplanned unity marks a work of God rather than a work of men.
- Standing. The neighbours did not despise this small group for going. They sent them off rich.
- Sifted. The open decree let each heart show itself. Some faced the hardship. Others kept their comfortable homes and left the task to someone else.
And king Cyrus brought forth the vessels of the house of Jehovah, which Nebuchadnezzar had brought forth out of Jerusalem and had put in the house of his god.
Nebuchadnezzar carried the temple's gold and silver into a pagan treasury. Seventy years later, a Persian king opens that treasury and hands the sacred vessels back. Why did God count these objects so important? And what does their return say about how He restores what His people have lost?
Cyrus was not the only heart God moved. One writer reads the king's act as proof that God had touched him too:
Finally, Cyrus himself showed his interest in the work. He restored the vessels of the temple that Nebuchadnezzar had carried out of Jerusalem and put in the house of his gods. This was evidence that his own heart had also been touched by divine power. He counted these vessels out to Sheshbazzar, the prince of Judah.
God worked in two places at once:
God worked spiritually in the souls of His people, and He matched it with a providential work in the world around them. And so it has been again in more recent times.
The scale of the damage was not what set God's clock running:
There had been three deportations... The last of these three did the most damage. The temple was burnt, and very large numbers were led away captive. But the 70 years of captivity count from the first deportation, which we would call relatively unimportant. Why was this first one the important one in God's eyes? Well, it's because of the vessels. Nebuchadnezzar had taken the vessels of the Temple to Babylon, and even put them into the house of his idols. Such a thing had never happened before. True, some kings had taken silver from the treasure and even from the wings of the doors of the temple to appease the king of Assyria. But the holy vessels had never been touched.
The loss was not sentimental. It shut down the whole system of approach to God:
Without vessels, it was impossible to bring sacrifices as prescribed. No vessels, no worship! This is the tragedy. Does it not remind us of the sad fact that the idea of worship, and especially worship together, has been lost across much of the Christian world?
Because they stood for worship itself, the gap between their removal and their return carries weight:
These vessels represented the worship rendered to God. The period of seventy years between their removal and return, as announced by the prophet, emphasizes their symbolic importance.
Nebuchadnezzar put the vessels of the true God inside an idol's temple. One writer asks what that really changed, and then points to where it ended:
God had been dishonoured by the idolatry of the people and their kings. Was there any great difference whether the precious vessels stayed in His temple or were placed in the temple of idols at Babylon?... When wicked Belshazzar drank wine from the sacred vessels in praise of his idols, he meant to celebrate the triumph of false gods over the true God, and to set them publicly against the Lord. That same night, God answered him with judgment and death.
The vessels outlasted the empire that stole them:
No doubt Cyrus had these vessels collected and carefully guarded... How it all shows that God had not forgotten His people! When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf.
One thing never came back, and its absence shapes the whole return:
The holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for the Lord's house in Jerusalem. The ark — the centre, the highest in value, the nearest to the glory — was not there. Sadly, the glory itself had withdrawn. But in the day when the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, never to leave again.
These were not new vessels. The old ones came back, and one writer draws the lesson for God's people now:
What the people of God need today is not so much innovation, but a return to the basic principles that were there from the beginning — a return to the Scriptures... A genuine revival always shows itself in the discovery of the Scriptures. It is not that the Scriptures could not have been known before. Through negligence they had been forgotten.
Later in the book, Ezra hands the same kind of treasure to chosen men with a charge about who may touch it:
The ground of the choice was, that they were "holy to the Lord," as also were the vessels. As the prophet said, "You must be clean that bear the vessels of the Lord."
- Taken — God dated the captivity from the first and smallest deportation. The reason was the vessels. No earlier king had put them in an idol's house.
- Silenced — Without the vessels, no one could bring the prescribed sacrifices. No vessels, no worship — and seventy years of silence.
- Kept — Babylon profaned them, and God answered that same night with judgment. The vessels outlived the empire. God had not forgotten His people.
- Returned — Cyrus counted the old vessels out to Judah's prince. Recovery means going back to what was there from the beginning, not inventing something new.
- Incomplete — The ark was missing and the glory had withdrawn. A day is coming when the glory returns and never leaves.
And Cyrus king of Persia brought them forth by the hand of Mithredath the treasurer, who counted them out to Sheshbazzar the prince of Judah.
Cyrus does not just free the captives — he also hands back the gold and silver articles Nebuchadnezzar had looted from the temple. Who is this Sheshbazzar, and why does Scripture give so much space to a list of bowls and dishes?
Two names, one man. Commentators explain the name in this verse as a Babylonian name given during the exile.
This prince was Zerubbabel. Sheshbazzar was the name the Babylonians had given him. He was born in Babylon, and his name means "stranger in Babylon." He became the princely leader of the returning exiles... In all there were 5,400 vessels of gold and silver which were handed over to Zerubbabel to take back to Jerusalem. It all shows that God had not forgotten His people. When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf.
He was more than one exile among many.
He was a "prince of Judah," and he seems to have held some office in Persia, since he is called Sheshbazzar... He led the Jews who volunteered to return from exile under the decree of Cyrus.
The list of vessels looks like a minor detail. It actually sets the clock on the whole captivity.
There had been three deportations... The last of these three was the most significant one in terms of the damage done. The temple was burnt, and very large numbers led captive. But the 70 years of captivity run from the first deportation — the one we would call minor. Why was this first one the important one in God's eyes? Well, it's because of the vessels.
Take away the vessels and something more than property is lost.
Without vessels, it was impossible to bring sacrifices as prescribed. No vessels, no worship! This is the tragedy. Doesn't this remind us of a sad fact? Much of the Christian world has lost the whole idea of worship, and above all of worship together. Concerts, performances, and all sorts of other things have taken the place of meetings for worship.
Cyrus had to fetch these things out of a pagan temple before he could hand them back. Someone kept the record down to the last item.
King Cyrus had all the articles Nebuchadnezzar had taken from Jerusalem brought out of the temple of his idols. He sent them back to their rightful place. He knew that Babylon's idols were not God. The Persian treasurer, Mithredath, counted these out to Sheshbazzar the prince of Judah. The record of them was faithfully kept.
One thing is missing from the list, and it is the most valuable of all.
The holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. The ark was not there — the centre, the most valuable, the nearest to the glory. Sadly, the glory itself had gone. But on the day when the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, never to leave again.
A foreign king, the builders, and those who stayed behind all move in step. No one organised it.
The Lord produced the same heart and the same aim in everyone involved. Cyrus was one of them, and without his permission the captives could not have returned. Another group was the leading fathers of Judah and Benjamin, who were needed for the actual building work. A third was those who stayed behind... There were no meetings beforehand to arrange things and reach agreement. The union of heart and purpose came from the Lord's action on the hearts of all alike... So every instrument that is needed comes forward at the right moment, for the work is of God, and it must be done.
This pattern was not limited to Ezra's day.
Alongside the spiritual work of God in the souls of His people ran a providential work of God in the world around them. So it has been again in more recent times.
- Taken. The vessels went to Babylon first. God dated the seventy years from that loss, not from the burning of the temple.
- Emptied. No vessels meant no sacrifices, so the real loss was worship itself. The same loss happens wherever performance takes the place of worship.
- Kept. They sat in an idol's temple, yet they were still there when Cyrus went looking. God had not forgotten His people.
- Counted. Mithredath counted them out item by item to the prince of Judah, and the record was kept. What God restores, He restores in order and into named hands.
- Incomplete. The ark is missing from the list, and the glory had gone. The return under Zerubbabel is real but partial; the glory comes back in full only when salvation comes out of Zion.
And this is the number of them thirty chargers of gold, a thousand chargers of silver, nine-and-twenty knives,
Ezra pauses the story of a nation's return to print a warehouse list: bowls, platters and knives, counted one by one. Why does God's Word keep a receipt? And why did these objects matter enough to count?
A Persian official counted the items out, one by one, to the leader of Judah. Where the list below says knives, the ESV says censers.
More important still, King Cyrus brought out all the articles that Nebuchadnezzar had taken from Jerusalem. They were in the temple of his idols, and Cyrus sent them back to where they belonged. He knew that Babylon's idols were not God. The Persian treasurer, Mithredath, counted these out to Sheshbazzar the prince of Judah. The record listed each one: 30 gold platters, 1000 silver platters, 29 knives, 30 gold basins, 410 silver basins, and 1000 other articles. The total number of gold and silver articles was 5,400.
These were working tools. Without them, the whole system of sacrifice stopped.
Without vessels, it was impossible to bring sacrifices as prescribed. No vessels, no worship! This is the tragedy. Does it not remind us of the sad fact that the idea of worship, especially worship together, has been lost in wide parts of Christendom?
The vessels also stood for something, and the length of their absence shows how much.
King Belshazzar desecrated the sacred vessels carried away to Babylon. Cyrus decreed their return, and some of them will come back and be put in the restored temple (Ezra 1:7-11). These vessels represented the worship rendered to God. The prophet announced seventy years between their removal and their return. That long span shows their symbolic importance.
Three waves of captives went to Babylon. The first wave lost something the other two did not.
This first captivity had a particular character. The second and third captivities brought devastation and carried away great numbers of men. The first one stripped the house of the Lord instead, robbing it of the precious objects used in the service of worship. At the time of Judah's restoration, all these objects came back, 5,400 of them. That was the most characteristic feature of the journey that brought the remnant of the people back to their land.
Commentators differ here. Some say every object came back. Others say only part of them did.
One item is missing from the list, and its absence says more than the totals.
The holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. The ark, the centre, the highest in value, the nearest to the glory, was not there. Sadly, the glory itself had withdrawn. But in the day that the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, never to leave again. When Jehovah turns again the captivity of His people, it will be no feeble remnant: Jacob shall be glad, Israel shall rejoice.
The man who signed for the goods had two names, and his story points past his own day.
Mithredath the treasurer handed them to Sheshbazzar the prince of Judah. This prince was Zerubbabel; Sheshbazzar was the name the Babylonians had given him. He was born in Babylon, and his name means "stranger in Babylon." He became the prince who led the returning exiles… All this shows that God had not forgotten His people. When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf. Nor has He forgotten His promise to bring a remnant back from the great scattering among all the nations of the world. When that return comes, a greater than Zerubbabel the prince of Judah will be the leader. The Lord Jesus, the Son of David, will be their Deliverer.
A count at the start means a reckoning at the end.
The children of Israel, the remnant who returned from Babylon, had the precious vessels of the temple entrusted to them. They received them in far-off Babylon. They had to carry them safely across all the distance in between until they came to Jerusalem. There they were to weigh them out. They had to give full account for every vessel of the sanctuary put into their hands. So if, in the middle of Babylonian confusion, God in His mercy has put these precious truths into our hands and into our hearts, let us hold fast to them as we go through the wilderness. And when we reach that holy place, let us be ready to give full account, full weight, for every truth entrusted to us.
- Taken — the first captivity stripped God's house of its worship vessels, and seventy years ran between their removal and their return.
- Kept — the vessels sat in an idol's temple, and Belshazzar desecrated them, yet Cyrus brought them out again.
- Counted — a Persian treasurer handed 5,400 gold and silver articles, item by item, to a prince of Judah born in exile.
- Restored — without vessels there was no sacrifice and no worship, so the vessels went back with the returning remnant.
- Incomplete — the ark was missing and the glory had gone. The full return still waits for a leader greater than Zerubbabel.
thirty basons of gold, silver basons of a second [sort] four hundred and ten, [and] other vessels a thousand.
As the exiles prepare to leave Babylon, officials count out the temple articles Nebuchadnezzar had carried off, piece by piece. Why does Scripture record the exact number of gold and silver bowls — and what did those objects mean to God?
The Hebrew word behind "bowls" (older translations say "basons") names a specific piece of temple equipment:
kephor, 'large cup or bowl,' probably for the wine drunk before the Lord; where Scripture speaks of blood, it uses a different word. 1 Chr. 28:17; Ezra 1:10; Ezra 8:27.
One writer traces God's seventy-year clock back to these vessels:
There had been three deportations. The last of the three did the most damage: the temple was burnt, and very large numbers of people were led captive. But the 70 years of captivity count from the first deportation — the one we would call relatively unimportant. Why was this first one the important one in God's eyes? Well, it's because of the vessels. Nebuchadnezzar had taken the vessels of the Temple, took them to Babylon, and even put them into the house of his idols. Such a thing had never happened before. True, some kings had taken silver from the treasure and even from the wings of the doors of the temple (Ahas and Hezekiah) to appease the king of Assyria. But the holy vessels had never been touched.
The loss was not only material. One writer draws out what it cost Israel, and what a similar loss costs today:
Without vessels, it was impossible to bring sacrifices as prescribed. No vessels, no worship! This is the tragedy. Does it not remind us of a sad fact? Wide parts of Christendom have lost the very idea of worship, and especially of worship together. Concerts, performances, and all kinds of things have replaced meetings for worship. Do you know a place where you can meet with Christians in full liberty of collective worship to the Father and the Son? This is the one thing the Father 'seeks': worshippers.
One writer sees two works of God running side by side — one inside the hearts of the exiles, one out in the wider world:
Verse 5 of the first chapter shows that there was a real work of God in the souls of many, including leaders both civil and religious. This work led them to seize at once the opportunity given them: to return to the land of their fathers and re-establish the worship of God by rebuilding His house. In the providence of God, Cyrus actively promoted this. Besides the valuable vessels given by Jews who did not join the journey to Jerusalem, he restored all the holy vessels of the house of the Lord, which Nebuchadnezzar had placed in the house of his gods. God's work in the souls of His people was matched by His providential work in the world around them.
One writer follows the vessels from the idol's temple into the hands of Zerubbabel:
Then Cyrus restored the vessels of the house of the LORD, which Nebuchadnezzar had brought from Jerusalem and put into the house of his gods (Daniel 1:2). His grandson, Belshazzar, defiled them at his shameless feast (Dan. 5:2). That same night Belshazzar was killed and Babylon fell. No doubt Cyrus had these vessels collected and carefully guarded... In all there were 5,400 vessels of gold and silver, handed over to Zerubbabel to take back to Jerusalem. It all shows that God had not forgotten His people. When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf.
Yet one article never appears in the list, and it was the greatest of all:
The holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. The ark, the centre, the highest in value, the nearest to the glory, was not there. Sadly, the glory itself had gone away. But in the day that the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, never to leave again.
- Vessels named. The "bowls" are large cups, probably used for the wine drunk before the Lord. They were working equipment for God's house, not decoration.
- Vessels taken. Nebuchadnezzar put the holy vessels in an idol's temple, something no king had done before. God dated the seventy years from that deportation.
- Vessels missed. Without them the appointed sacrifices could not be offered at all: no vessels, no worship.
- Vessels returned. Cyrus collected, guarded and released 5,400 gold and silver articles. God had not forgotten His people. His work in their hearts was matched by His work in world affairs.
- Vessels incomplete. The ark, the most valuable and the closest to the glory, was missing from the list. The glory itself returns in the day Israel's salvation comes out of Zion.
All the vessels of gold and of silver were five thousand four hundred. The whole did Sheshbazzar bring up, when they of the captivity were brought up from Babylon to Jerusalem.
Ezra's first chapter ends with an inventory rather than a speech. It raises three questions: who was Sheshbazzar, why does God count temple dishes so carefully, and what does it mean that freed captives go home carrying the vessels of their worship?
One writer explains where the name Sheshbazzar came from, and who this man was.
Mithredath the treasurer handed them to Sheshbazzar the prince of Judah. This prince was Zerubbabel: Sheshbazzar was the name the Babylonians had given him. He was born in Babylon; his name means "stranger in Babylon." He became the prince who led the returning exiles… In all, Zerubbabel received 5,400 vessels of gold and silver to take back to Jerusalem. It all shows that God had not forgotten His people. When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf.
The same writer looks ahead to a further return, with a greater leader:
He has not forgotten His promise either. He will bring a remnant back from the great scattering among all the nations of the world. When that return comes, a greater than Zerubbabel the prince of Judah will be the leader. The Lord Jesus, the Son of David, will be their Deliverer.
One writer shows that these vessels gave the first captivity its whole character.
This first captivity had a character of its own. Devastation and the great number of men carried away marked the second and the third captivities. What marked the first was the plundering of the house of the Lord, stripped of the precious objects used in the service of worship… When Judah was restored, all these objects came back — 5,400 of them. This was even the most characteristic feature of the exodus that brought the remnant of the people back to their land… The main feature at the start of these 70 years is that the glory of the temple, the glory of the service of the worship of the Lord, was itself carried away captive.
The same writer explains why taking these vessels was worse than any earlier stripping of the temple.
Under Jehoiachin, Nebuchadnezzar plundered all the treasures of the house of God on a far greater scale, and smashed the vessels which Solomon had made… But, I repeat, this was a profanation with no precedent: decorating a temple of idols with the vessels made for the worship of the true God… Wicked Belshazzar drank wine from the sacred vessels with his lords, his wives and his concubines, in praise of his idols. He meant to celebrate the triumph of false gods over the true God, and to set them against the Lord in public. That same night, God answered him with judgment and death.
The list is exact, but one thing is missing from it.
The holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. But the ark was not there — the centre of it all, the highest in value, the nearest to the glory. Sadly, the glory itself had withdrawn. But in the day that the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, no more to leave.
Two works of God stand behind this return.
Verse 5 of the first chapter shows a real work of God in the souls of many… It led them to seize at once the opportunity they were given to return to the land of their fathers, and to set up the worship of God again by rebuilding His house. In the providence of God, Cyrus promoted this… he restored all the holy vessels of the house of the Lord, which Nebuchadnezzar had placed in the house of his gods. God's spiritual work in the souls of His people was matched by His providential work in the world around them.
One writer turns this care for dishes into comfort for God's people.
He keeps the basins and knives of His house. He brings the vessels back again to the second temple. So His care for His redeemed ones must be more tender than His care for a spoon.
- Spoiled. Above all, the first captivity stripped God's house of the objects used in worship.
- Profaned. Those same vessels stood in an idol temple. Belshazzar drank from them to crown his false gods over the true God. God answered that same night with judgment.
- Counted. A Persian treasurer counted out every item into the hands of Sheshbazzar, the prince of Judah. He was born in exile, and his name means "stranger in Babylon."
- Carried. The vessels went up with the people. The return of worship was the mark of this exodus, and proof that God had not forgotten His own.
- Incomplete. The ark was not in the list, and the glory had withdrawn. The restoration was real but partial. It points on to a greater Leader and a glory that will not leave again.
And these are the children of the province, that went up out of the captivity of those that had been carried away, whom Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon had carried away to Babylon, and who came again to Jerusalem and to Judah, every one to his city,
Ezra 2 is a long list of names and numbers, and verse 1 is its heading. In one sentence it says who these people are, where they had been, and where they went: a nation carried off to Babylon, and a small company now walking home.
They are not called a kingdom here, but the people of a province — a district inside someone else's empire. One writer hears honesty in that word:
What a humbling description: "the people of the province who came up out of the captivity"! Pride forgets and hides such things. Faith, cleared and cheered by grace, can afford on the darkest day to admit the truth: Israel may change, but the Lord does not change. That is why the sons of Jacob are not destroyed. His own people may well be ashamed of themselves; they glory in Him alone, and in His grace toward them. Yet they were still under the Gentile powers, as Christ Himself pressed home to their rebellious spirits.
The verse says they came up out of the captivity. One commentator sets this return beside the earlier rescue from Egypt, and notes how few joined it:
As we all know, God redeemed the people out of Egypt, and still they failed completely. They fell again and again into idolatry under their kings, until the captivity in Babylon came. When the foretold period had passed, Cyrus allowed a return to rebuild the temple, and we read, "Now these were the people of the province who came up OUT of the captivity" (Ezra 2:1). Once more God called His people out, though only a few of the many answered.
A register of families and head-counts can look like dry paperwork. One writer reads its survival as a sign of what God thought of these people, however little they grasped His plans:
The very existence of this list shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people, however weakly they had entered into His thoughts about His house. That is why He has kept it on record. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that He knows the names of His people and makes them known. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
Names and numbers can seem like the least spiritual part of the Bible. One writer ties this list to what the New Testament says about God's memory:
This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a sample page of the records God keeps. From it we may learn that He remembers His people, that He knows them by name, and that He does not forget their works. Nehemiah repeats this list (chapter 7), and adds a record of those who helped build the wall. He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16). The apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for his name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).
Each one returned to his own town — and with the return came a new seriousness about who belonged. Dennett links that new care to what the exile itself had been:
In the land of their exile they had not taken the same care over who had a right to a place and who was qualified. Babylon stands for the corruption that holds God's people in bondage through their sins. So their time in captivity was a careless time. They were suffering under the hand of their God, yet it was still a time of confusion and disorder. It had to be, since they had no temple, no sacrifices, and were without the Lord's presence. But now, through the mercy of their God, there had been a recovery... and now that the Lord's house was to be their centre once more, they were right to examine the claim of everyone who had returned from Babylon.
Commentators differ on how far this company should be called the faithful remnant. Rossier stops short of that title, yet still holds them up as a pattern:
This remnant of Judah returned to Jerusalem under Cyrus, to wait for the Messiah and welcome Him. They are not the true remnant. Even so, the Holy Spirit presents them as showing the marks a believing remnant should take on in a time of ruin. They are a most helpful example for us Christians, who now find ourselves among the ruins of Christendom: an example that teaches us how we may be witnesses of God in hard circumstances.
- Province, not kingdom — the heading admits how far they had fallen. Faith can own that, because God has not changed.
- Out of captivity — God called His people out a second time, and only a few of the many answered.
- Counted by name — the list survives as proof that God takes joy in the smallest fruit of His work and knows His people by name.
- Not forgotten — Ezra's page matches God's book of remembrance. He does not overlook work done for His name.
- Home, and careful — captivity bred carelessness about who belonged. Back with God's house at their centre, the returning company tested every claim.
who came with Zerubbabel, Jeshua, Nehemiah, Saraiah, Reelaiah, Mordecai, Bilshan, Mispar, Bigvai, Rehum, Baanah. The number of the men of the people of Israel
God keeps a list. Ezra 2 records who left Babylon for Jerusalem, and verse 2 names their eleven leaders — a governor from David's line, a priest, and nine more.
Edward Dennett draws his point from the mere fact that such a list survives.
The very existence of this list shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have had only a weak grasp of His thoughts about His house. Even so, He kept this list on record. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows too that He knows and announces the very names of His people, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways.
There is a quieter side to the same record. F. B. Hole notices who is missing from it.
God took note of them and put their names into His record. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go He passed over in silence. Let us take note of this.
The order of the names carries meaning. The Bible Treasury notes that the royal name stands first, though the crown itself was gone.
They were still subject to the Gentile powers, and Christ Himself pressed this on their rebellious hearts. His first coming did not change it, because they were sinful and unbelieving... So the first named is not the high priest, but the heir without the throne of David.
Hole names the office Zerubbabel held and the size of the company these two men led.
The first name mentioned is Zerubbabel, who became the "Tirshatha," or civil governor; the second, Jeshua, the priest called Joshua in the books of Haggai and Zechariah. These were the leaders in the migration of 42,360 people, besides some servants and other possessions. The kingdom was not restored, as though the times of the Gentiles had ended.
Arno Gaebelein traces the family lines behind these two names. He also spots a gap in the count.
There were twelve leaders. Ezra gives only eleven. Nehemiah's record adds one more name, Nahamani, making twelve in all. Zerubbabel was the leader of the returning captives. His name means "seed of Babylon." Scripture calls him the son of Shealtiel, the son or grandson of Jeconiah, so he was a descendant of David. His name appears in the two genealogies of Matthew (1:12) and Luke (3:27)... The second leader was Jeshua, also called Joshua. He was a son of Jehozadak and grandson of the high priest Seraiah. Zerubbabel the royal leader, son of David, and Joshua the high priest are both types of Christ.
Two names here match far better-known people elsewhere in the Bible. Leslie Grant rules out the first.
The Nehemiah mentioned here cannot be the Nehemiah whose book follows Ezra, for he did not come at first, nor with so large a company (Nehemiah 2:9).
Some of the names themselves shift between Ezra's list and Nehemiah's. Two examples: Seraiah here is thought to be the man called Azariah in Nehemiah 7:7, and Mizpar here appears there as Mispereth.
One who returned from exile, Nehemiah 7:7: supposed, as in the margin, to be the same as Seraiah in Ezra 2:2.
Forty-two thousand people were nothing beside the nation's former size. Michael Hardt puts the objection those returning had to face into plain words.
"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then, the people must have grown. And now there were just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be." But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.
Hole names the first mark of a real revival, and answers the charge that these people were just a party gathered around a man.
There was a definite revival, and the first mark of it was this: they got back to God's original centre. Compared with the whole number of scattered Jews they were only a few. Many worldly people may have nicknamed them "Zerubbabelites." Still, they were not that. They were simply a few who cared for their God and sought His original centre.
- Recorded — the list survives as evidence that God takes joy in the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that He knows His people by name.
- Omitted — God passed over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. The record marks who went and who stayed.
- Ranked — Zerubbabel stands first: the heir without David's throne, made civil governor under a Gentile empire. The kingdom itself was never given back.
- Paired — the royal leader from David's line and Jeshua the high priest are both types of Christ.
- Few — 42,360 out of a people that once counted 600,000 men and their families. Faith looked at God's word, not at the numbers, and went back to His centre.
The children of Parosh, two thousand one hundred and seventy-two.
The list of returning exiles opens here with one family name and one number. Why would God keep a page of names and headcounts in His word? And what does it say about Him that He counted this first family at all?
One writer says the first thing to notice is that this list exists at all. Its survival tells us what God thought of His people's response.
There are several interesting things to notice in the record. The first is that the list exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response which His grace had produced in the hearts of His people, however feebly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has caused this list to be preserved. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
A page of numbers can feel cold. One writer finds the opposite in it.
Still, is it not a precious truth that God takes pleasure in letting His people know that every one of them is prized by Him? A sad change had come through Israel's sin, through Judah's sin, and not least through the sin of David's house. Sin gives occasion to His grace, but it cannot be without man's humiliation, and faith takes account of both. But God always waits to bless, and to give His own the proof and sense of His blessing. We see this even in the numbering of those who returned from Babylon.
The list does not name each person. It counts them by family — so many belonging to Parosh, so many to the next family head. That way of counting mattered to them.
So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand plainly and clearly as sons of the covenant. Descent by natural birth, in the line of promise, mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Never before had such jealous care been necessary, and it was needed most in the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people too: none but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
Most of these names mean nothing to a reader today. They still meant something to God.
This very long chapter consists mainly of lists of names, most of them completely unknown to us. But God is pleased to take account of those who took this great step, those who went up out of the captivity, to Jerusalem (v. 1).
One writer imagines the objections these families had to answer before they set out. One of them was arithmetic.
"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then the people must have grown. And now there are just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be."
The answer is not a bigger number. It is a different guide.
But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance; it looks at God's word.
Another writer turns this list into a question for the reader. He keeps it separate from the question of salvation.
Dear saint of God, where are you? What feast are you keeping? Are the Lord's interests first, or your own? Your name may be in the Lamb's Book of Life. Every redeemed sinner's name is there, all of grace and mercy for Christ's sake alone. But does your name also have a place in what answers to Ezra 2?
- Counted. The numbering is mercy, not pride. God lets His people know that every one of them is prized by Him.
- Named. The list exists because God treasures the response His grace produced. The names of His people are known and proclaimed.
- Claimed. Each figure sits under a family head. The remnant were careful to stand clearly as sons of the covenant, as careful as a Christian should be about being born of God.
- Costly. Behind the unknown names stands a great step taken, and God takes account of those who took it.
- Small. The company looked far too few to be right, but faith takes its direction from God's word, not from the headcount.
The children of Shephatiah, three hundred and seventy-two.
Ezra 2 is a roll call. Verse 4 is one line in it: a family name and a count of the people who left Babylon for Jerusalem. So why does a whole chapter of Scripture consist of names and figures like this?
The striking thing about this register is not what it says. It is that God kept it at all.
The very fact that this list exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — however feebly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept the list on record. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and announced, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to take their stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
Verse 4 sits in the first block of the list. The chapter does not group everyone the same way.
24,144 people returned from the captivity. Zerubbabel and Jeshua (or Joshua) the high priest led them, helped by nine chief men. From verse 3 to verse 20 of chapter 2, they are listed by the name of their fathers. From verse 21 to verse 34 they are listed by the name of their cities. Those listed by their cities went to live in and re-people their home cities, once they had returned to Palestine.
For the small group that came back, naming your father's house was not sentiment. It settled whether you belonged.
So we see that this remnant are careful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Family descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Such care had never been so necessary before. No one but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
One writer turns the same test into a question for Christians today.
Then the answer was found: only those who could "show their father's house," or could find "their register," had the scriptural qualification for a place at the table of the Lord. In other words, we must have peace with God. We must know that we are children of God because we have the Spirit of adoption. That is how we show our Father's house and trace our genealogy. Without it we do not have the divine title required. Profession is not enough.
Nehemiah 7 repeats this census, and commentators differ over why some of its numbers do not match. One explanation is transmission of the text — the examples given are other families, not Shephatiah.
The gross amount in both is the same; yet the details oddly differ: how this is may not be so easy to decide. We know that numerals are especially liable to corruption, whether through the carelessness or the boldness of copyists. For instance, in Ezra 2:5 the sons of Arah are 775, in Nehemiah 7:10 they are 652.
Another reading treats the two figures as two different moments: who signed up, and who actually travelled.
Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each one and kept them going on the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are here 775, and in Nehemiah we find only 652. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.
372 is a small figure, and the whole company was small next to what Israel had once been. So one writer voices the objection that small numbers invite.
"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then, the people must have grown. And now there were just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be." But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.
The chapter is read as a glimpse into a much larger book still being written.
It is a sample page of the records which God keeps, and from it we may learn that He remembers His people, whom He knows by name and whose works are not forgotten by Him. He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16); and the apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this fact when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for His name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).
- Named. The list survives because God treasured the response His grace produced, even a feeble one. He kept the names to encourage others.
- Placed. Each name sits under a father's house or a home city, and those listed by city went back to re-people it.
- Proved. Descent was title. What genealogy was to them, being born of God is to the Christian — and profession alone is not enough.
- Few. Numbers never settled the question — faith looked at God's word, not at how small the company was.
- Remembered. God keeps His own record of His servants and their work, and it will be opened when each one receives his reward.
The children of Arah, seven hundred and seventy-five.
This verse names one family head and gives one number. The line sits inside a long register of those who came home from Babylon, and it is easy to read past. Yet God had the list written down, and then had it repeated in Nehemiah. Why does He keep count of families like this one?
The register is not an administrative leftover. One commentator reads its survival as proof of how much God valued the movement of heart that brought these families out of Babylon.
There are several interesting things to notice in the record. The first is that the list exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response which His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have grasped His thoughts about His house only weakly. For this reason He has kept this list on record. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the very names of His people and proclaims them. This is an encouragement to everyone to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
The record has a sharp edge too. What it leaves out matters as much as what it includes.
Chapter two, apart from the last three verses, gives the number of those who answered the proclamation. They are listed under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names in His record. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence. Let us take note of this.
This counting comes after a long collapse into sin. One writer holds two things together: the humiliation that sin brings, and God's pleasure in numbering His own.
Still, is it not a precious truth that God takes pleasure in letting His people know that every one of them is prized by Him? A sad change had come through Israel's sin and through Judah's, and not least through the sin of David's house. Sin does give occasion to His grace, but it cannot be without man's humiliation. Faith takes account of both. And God always waits to bless. He waits to give His own the proof and the sense of His blessing. We see this even in the numbering of those who returned from Babylon.
Nehemiah's copy of this same register gives Arah's family as 652. Commentators differ on the reason. One writer holds that no one in these families is named, yet each one is known — and that the gap between the two figures has a good explanation.
Their own names are not written down, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each member and carried them through the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, and in Nehemiah only 652 are recorded. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.
Another writer compares the two lists in detail. He points instead to the risks of copying numbers by hand, and he still finds comfort in what the two registers agree on.
On the whole the lists agree. The overall total in both is the same, yet the details differ in striking ways. How this happened may not be so easy to decide. We know that numbers go wrong easily, whether a copyist was careless or too daring. For instance, in Ezra 2:5 the sons of Arah are 775, in Nehemiah 7:10 they are 652. … The totals of the servants, the houses, the males and the ages all agree. How good it is for the heart to know that the living God takes a real interest not only in His people, but in all that is theirs!
Being able to say "I belong to the sons of Arah" was not about feelings. It was the proof that let a person share in the building.
So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand clear and simple as sons of the covenant. Descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Never had such careful watchfulness been so necessary. It was needed most of all in the priests. But it was true of the people too: none but Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
- Grace first. God's grace in their hearts produced the response that put Arah's family on this list. The list records His work, not their own plan.
- Grace recorded. Because He values that response, God kept the register. He writes down the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work, and passes over in silence those who stayed behind.
- Grace counts. The numbering is not cold bookkeeping. In a day of humiliation, God lets His people know that He prizes each one of them.
- Grace knows each one. The 775 are never named one by one, yet the Lord knows them all, cares for each, and brings each one home.
- Grace gives title. A place in the register gave the right to build. Descent in the line of promise meant to them what being born of God means to the Christian.
The children of Pahath-Moab, of the children of Jeshua [and] Joab, two thousand eight hundred and twelve.
This verse is one line in a long register. It counts 2,812 people under the family head Pahath-moab, in two branches under Jeshua and Joab, among those who left Babylon for Jerusalem. Commentators do not treat such a line as filler. They ask why God kept it, and why family descent and exact numbers mattered so much to the people who came home.
The whole chapter is a list. The first question is why God kept it at all:
The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. It shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. That is true however feebly they entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list safe. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. The very names of His people are known and proclaimed, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
Not every Jewish family appears here. Many stayed behind, and the register says nothing about them:
Apart from its last three verses, chapter two gives the number of those who answered the proclamation, family by family. It names the heads and counts the families. God took note of them and put their names into His record. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go, He passes over in silence. Let us take note of this.
The head of this household has a name that reads more like an office than a person. The same family appears again later in the story:
'Governor of Moab.' A family who returned from exile, one of whom sealed the covenant, and several had married foreign wives. Ezra 2:6; Ezra 8:4; Ezra 10:30; Neh. 3:11; Neh. 7:11; Neh. 10:14.
Listing people by father's house was not genealogical curiosity. It settled who had a right to share in the work, and one writer compares the weight of it to something every Christian understands:
So we see that the remnant are careful to stand clear and simple as sons of the covenant. Descent by natural birth inside the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Such careful watchfulness had never been needed before, and it was needed most among the priests. It was true of the people too: only Israelites could build a temple to the God of Israel.
The same register appears again in Nehemiah 7. Several totals there differ, including this one. Commentators differ on why. One points to the copying of numbers:
The lists agree in substance. The overall total in both is the same, yet the details differ in a strange way. How that happened may not be easy to decide. We know that numbers are very easy to corrupt, whether through the carelessness or the boldness of copyists. For instance, the sons of Pahath-moab and of Binnui are each 6 more in Nehemiah; the sons of Zattu 100 less.
Another writer suggests a different reason. Perhaps the two figures count two different things: those who signed up, and those who went:
Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each one and kept them going through the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For example, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, and in Nehemiah only 652 are recorded. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.
- Grace stirs. The journey home started with what God's grace produced in the hearts of His people.
- Grace records. God put their names in His record — each family head, each household count — because He treasures the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work.
- Grace omits. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are left out, passed over in silence.
- Grace tests descent. To be listed, a family had to prove its line, because only Israelites could build a temple to the God of Israel.
- Grace keeps count. Commentators differ over why some totals differ from Nehemiah's copy. No one doubts that the Lord knows each person He brought home.
The children of Elam, a thousand two hundred and fifty-four.
A single clan name and a head count sit in the middle of a long register of people coming home from exile in Babylon. Why would God keep a list like this? And what does one family's number mean to readers who have never heard the name?
This is not leftover paperwork. One commentator says the list survives in Scripture to show how God values a willing response:
Several interesting details stand out in this record. The first is that the list exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people, however weakly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. This is why He has kept this list safe. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that He knows and announces the very names of His people.
The chapter's silence says as much as its names. Another writer notices who is missing:
Apart from the last three verses, chapter two gives details of how many answered the proclamation. It groups them under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record, while those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence. Let us take note of this.
The chapter follows an order. That order shows what this entry is: a family traced to its ancestor, not a town:
24,144 people returned from the captivity (Ezra 2:1-35). Zerubbabel and Jeshua (or Joshua) the high priest led them, and nine chief men helped. Verses 3 to 20 of chapter 2 list them by the name of their fathers. Verses 21 to 34 list them by the name of their cities. Those listed by their cities went back to live in and refill their original cities, once they had returned to Palestine.
Elam is a name the Bible uses more than once, and more than one family bearing it came back:
Two or more whose descendants returned from exile. Ezra 2:7, 31; Ezra 8:7; Neh. 7:12, 34.
The verse gives a total, not a list of names. So did anyone get lost in the count? And why do some numbers here differ from the same list in Nehemiah 7?
The descendants of the different persons are now given. In all we find 24,144 descendants. Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all, and cared for each member and sustained them on the journey homeward. Even so He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are here 775, and in Nehemiah we find only 652 recorded. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.
This verse exists because these families could still say whose sons they were. One writer shows how much hung on that proof:
So we see that the remnant are careful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Genealogy according to the flesh in the line of promise was as momentous to them as being born of God is to the Christian. Never had such jealous care been so necessary; and this where it was most needed — in the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people too: none but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
A figure like 1,254 sounds large on its own. Set beside the whole scattered nation, it is small — and that small company marked a real revival:
Still there was a definite revival, and the first mark of it was this: they got back to God's original centre. Compared with the whole number of scattered Jews they were only a few. Many worldly people may have nicknamed them 'Zerubbabelites'. They were not that. They were just a few who cared for their God and sought His original centre.
Does a small number prove them wrong? One writer answers in a line:
But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.
- Counted — this register exists because God valued His people's response. He takes joy in the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work.
- Placed — verses 3-20 list families by their fathers' names. Verses 21-34 list them by their cities. This entry belongs to the first group.
- Proven — for this remnant, proof of descent mattered as much as being born of God matters to a Christian.
- Few — against the scattered nation they were a handful. Faith looks at God's word, not at numbers.
- Remembered — the verse names no one, yet the Lord knows them all. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go get no mention.
The children of Zattu, nine hundred and forty-five.
A single line in a long register — one family name and a number — is all this verse gives. Yet God kept a written record of the families who left Babylon for Jerusalem, and said nothing of those who stayed behind.
The whole chapter works the same way. It names a head of a family, then counts the people belonging to him. One writer notes who appears on the list and who does not.
Apart from the last three verses, chapter two sets out in detail how many answered the proclamation, listed under the heads of their families. It names the heads and counts the families. God took note of them and put their names into His record, while He says nothing of those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.
One writer sees the existence of the list as a sign of how much God valued a feeble response.
The list exists, and that shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only feebly into His thoughts about His house. Even so, He has kept this list, to show that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed.
Here the record names only the family head. The 945 are just a number to us. One writer says they are not just a number to God.
The descendants of the different persons are now given. In all we find 24,144 descendants. Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each one and sustained them on the journey homeward. Even so He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory.
Nehemiah 7:13 repeats this same register, but the total for this family is one hundred lower. Commentators differ on the reason. One points out how easily numbers get damaged in copying, yet is not satisfied with that answer:
On the whole the lists agree. The total in both is the same, yet the details differ oddly, and it may not be easy to decide why. We know that numbers are especially open to corruption, through either the carelessness or the recklessness of copyists. For instance, in Ezra 2:5 the sons of Arah are 775, and in Nehemiah 7:10 they are 652; the sons of Zattu are 100 less. But to put such frequent and marked differences down to a copyist's mistake is hard to accept.
Others keep the text as it stands. Gaebelein writes of that same family, "Probably 775 had enrolled their names but only 652 went." A third writer looks elsewhere:
Leave aside the guess that copyists made mistakes. That guess is as easy to make as it is unlikely. We notice first that Nehemiah's list of the leaders of the people contains a name, Nahamani (v. 7), which Ezra 2 does not mention. Second, we see that the genealogical registers drawn up by Zerubbabel kept being updated over a longer or shorter period of time (see Neh. 12:23).
The return was a small and humbled affair. One writer draws a principle from that:
Here is the principle I want you to see. Though it was a day of weakness and humiliation, it was not to be a day of neglect but of the greatest care. God's people were to be as watchful and alert for His name as when everything stood in the full power and beauty of divine order.
This family name comes up once more later in Ezra.
Ancestor of some who returned from exile. Ezra 2:8; Neh. 7:13. Several of the family married foreign wives. Ezra 10:27.
Numbers give no guidance. One writer says where faith looks instead:
Faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.
- Recorded — God wrote down the names of those who went up, and said nothing of those who stayed in Babylon.
- Reckoned — the list names one head and counts 945 under him, yet the Lord knows every unnamed person in that number, as He knows each of His sheep.
- Reason for the gap — Nehemiah's figure for this family is 100 lower. Commentators differ: some point to copying errors, some to more names enrolled than people who travelled, some to registers updated over time.
- Required — a day of weakness and humiliation called for the greatest care, not for neglect.
- Retold — later, some of this family married foreign wives. A place on God's list was a start, not a guarantee.
The children of Zaccai, seven hundred and sixty.
Ezra 2 is one long roll-call of families coming home from exile in Babylon. This verse is a single line in it — a family name and a headcount — so why did God keep such a small detail at all?
At first glance this is just paperwork. One writer says what the list really is:
This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a sample page of the records God keeps. From it we may learn that He remembers His people. He knows them by name, and He does not forget their works.
Those who came back were a fraction of the exiles, and their grasp of God's purpose for His house was thin. One writer says the list survives because of what it shows about God:
The first thing to notice is this. The very existence of this record shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. This was true even though they may have entered only feebly into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has had this list preserved. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and announced. That encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to take His interests as their own, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
A list that includes 760 people also excludes everyone else. One commentator draws attention to that silence:
The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence. Let us take note of this.
A family was not counted just for showing up. Its descent had to be clear:
So we see that the remnant are careful to stand clear and beyond question as sons of the covenant. Descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Never had such watchful care been so necessary... only Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
The chapter does not give a lump sum and move on. It counts the people group by group — families like this one, then towns. One writer sees purpose in that:
This chapter shows the definite interest God had in every individual who returned from the captivity. So it records the number from each city, and the total number too.
A family of 760 is a small thing next to a whole nation. One commentator puts that objection into words, then answers it:
"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families... Since then, the people must have grown. And now there were just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be." But faith does not look to numbers for guidance. It looks to God's word.
Nehemiah's record repeats this list. Some of the figures there do not match, though 760 for this family appears in both. One writer explains why the totals can differ:
This chapter does not give their individual names, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each one and sustained them on the journey home... If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, this list gives the descendants of Arah as 775, while Nehemiah gives only 652. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.
- Counted. This verse is one line on what one writer calls a sample page of God's records. He knows His people by name.
- Counted, not crowded. The chapter counts the returning people household by household. God had a definite interest in every individual who came back.
- Counted, or silent. The record keeps the names of those who went up. Those who stayed in Babylon are passed over in silence.
- Counted if proven. A family took its place here by clear descent in the line of promise. Only Israelites could build a temple to the God of Israel.
- Counted, though few. 760 is a small number, and the whole company was small. Faith decides by God's word, not by numbers.
The children of Bani, six hundred and forty-two.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
The children of Bebai, six hundred and twenty-three.
A single line in a long register: a family name, a number, and nothing more. Yet God had this count written twice — here and in Nehemiah 7 — so why do bare numbers about the returning exiles matter to Him?
That such a list exists at all tells us how God viewed the people who returned.
The first thing to notice is that the list exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have grasped His thoughts about His house only faintly. For this reason He kept this list on record. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and announced. That encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to make His interests their own, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and turning away from God.
This list is one small part of what God records.
This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a sample page of the records God keeps. From it we learn that He remembers His people. He knows them by name, and He does not forget their works... He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16). The apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for his name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).
Nehemiah's list gives a higher figure for this same family, and commentators differ on why. One explanation looks at how numbers fare in hand-copied manuscripts.
On the whole, the lists agree. The overall total in both is the same. Yet the details differ strikingly, and it may not be easy to say why. Numbers are especially easy to corrupt, through a copyist's carelessness or his rashness. For instance, in Nehemiah the sons of Bebai are 5 more than here, and those of Azgad 1100 more.
Another writer sees two different counts: those who enrolled, and those who went. He adds that the missing names take nothing away from these people.
Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all, and He cared for each member and sustained them on the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, and in Nehemiah only 652 are recorded. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.
The head-counting was not bureaucracy. It settled who had a right to share in the work.
So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand plainly and clearly as sons of the covenant. Descent by birth in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to a Christian. Never before had such jealous care been needed, and the priests needed it most. But it was true of the people too: they could allow no one but Israelites to build a temple to the God of Israel.
Behind a small number like 623 lay a hard choice. One objection was the size of the whole company.
"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then the people must have grown. And now there were just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be."
But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.
The name turns up again in later lists.
Two or three whose descendants returned from exile. Ezra 2:11; Ezra 8:11; Ezra 10:28; Neh. 7:16. And one who sealed the covenant. Neh. 10:15.
- Counted — a bare number stands in Scripture because God valued the response His grace had produced in them.
- Remembered — the register is a sample page of records God keeps; work done for His name is not overlooked.
- Unnamed — the 623 are never listed one by one, yet each was known and sustained all the way home.
- Tested — the small numbers argued against going. Faith looked at God's word, not at the head-count.
- Continued — the name appears in later lists too, including one who sealed the covenant.
The children of Azgad, a thousand two hundred and twenty-two.
One line in the list of returning exiles records a family name and a number. Why does Scripture keep a bare number at all — and why does Nehemiah's copy of the same list count this family differently?
One commentator starts from the plainest fact of all: this list has survived.
Several things in this record are worth noticing. Take the first. The list exists at all, and that shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered into His thoughts about His house only feebly. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed. That encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to make His interests their own, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
This verse sits in the first block of the list. Later in the chapter the grouping changes.
Verses 3 to 20 of chapter 2 list them by the name of their fathers. Verses 21 to 34 list them by the name of their cities. Those listed by their cities came back to Palestine. Then they went to live in their home cities and fill them with people again. The whole people was registered according to their genealogies, as Nehemiah 7:5 tells us.
The verse gives a number for this family, not a list of names. That silence is not a gap in God's knowledge:
Their individual names are not recorded but the Lord knows them all, and cared for each member and sustained them in the journey homeward. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory.
The name is not unique to this verse, and not to one man either:
Two men of this name, whose descendants returned from exile. Ezra 2:12; 8:12; Neh. 7:17.
Nehemiah copies this register, and for Azgad his figure is far larger. Commentators differ on the reason. One traces it to the way numbers fare in hand-copied manuscripts:
On the whole the lists agree. The overall total in both is the same. Yet the details differ sharply, and why that is may not be easy to decide. We know how easily numbers get corrupted, through a copyist's carelessness or his rashness. For instance, in Ezra 2:5 the sons of Arah are 775; in Neh. 7:10 they are 652. The sons of Zattu are 100 fewer in Nehemiah, the sons of Bebai 5 more, and those of Azgad 1100 more.
Another writer sets that explanation aside. He points to the register being updated later:
Set aside the guess that copyists made mistakes. That guess is as easy to make as it is unlikely. Notice first that Nehemiah's list of the leaders of the people holds a name, Nahamani (v. 7), which Ezra 2 does not mention. Second, the genealogical registers that Zerubbabel drew up were kept up to date over a longer or shorter period of time (see Neh. 12:23).
These family headings were not decoration. A temple was going to be built, and not just anyone could work on it:
So we see that the remnant are careful to stand plainly and clearly as sons of the covenant. Genealogy according to the flesh in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God does to the Christian. Never had such jealous care been so necessary; and this where it was most needed — in the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people too: only Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
- Recorded — the list has survived at all, and that shows how precious to God was the response His grace produced in His people.
- Counted — this family stands under its father's name. Later the chapter switches to counting by home town.
- Known — the verse gives a number, not names. The Lord knows each one and sustained them on the journey home.
- Checked — descent had to be provable, because only Israelites could build a temple to the God of Israel.
- Compared — Nehemiah's figure for this family runs 1100 higher. Writers differ on why: some point to copyists slipping on numbers, others to a register updated later.
The children of Adonikam, six hundred and sixty-six.
Ezra 2 lists the families who came home from exile in Babylon, with an exact count of each. Verse 13 names one house, Adonikam, and gives a total readers still stop at: 666.
Why did God keep page after page of names and numbers? One writer answers from the fact that the record exists at all.
The very existence of this record shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only weakly into His thoughts about His house. Even so, He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows that He knows the names of His people and announces them. That encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
Verse 13 counts Adonikam's descendants. It does not name them one by one. That does not make them anonymous to God.
Altogether we find 24,144 descendants. Their individual names are not recorded. But the Lord knows them all. He cared for each member and sustained them on the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory.
Readers have long noticed the figure. One writer meets it again while tracing this same household through a later return.
Of one family, the sons of Adonikam or Adonijah, "the last sons" seem to have gone up. From that family the ominous number, 666, had returned with Zerubbabel (Ezra 2:13).
Ezra itself gives the number no meaning, and no writer here treats it as a stain on the family. A Bible dictionary traces what six stands for across Scripture.
SIX. Incompleteness, imperfection (one short of the perfect number seven). Solomon had six steps to his great throne, 1 Kings 10:19, but it was not high enough to save him from idolatry. Each year he received six hundred and sixty-six talents of gold, 1 Kings 10:14, yet he had to confess that everything was vanity and a chasing after wind. The Jews at Cana had six water jars for purification, John 2:6, but those jars showed how far religious rituals fall short of meeting man's need. The number of the imperial beast will be six hundred and sixty-six, Rev. 13:18, imperfect in every respect.
The story of Adonikam does not end in chapter 2. Years later, when Ezra led a second group home, the rest of this household went with him.
In the middle of this procession, the sons of Adonikam shine. Most of them had returned with Zerubbabel (Ezra 2:13). Now the last children (v. 13) go up with Ezra. Their names are not forgotten. So the whole family is complete, and the book of God records this special blessing here. May we also see whole families, like Adonikam's, among those whom the Lord calls to testify of Him in these final days!
The same register appears again in Nehemiah 7, and many of the totals do not match. Commentators differ on the reason. One puts it down to the ordinary hazards of hand-copied documents.
The totals in both lists are the same, yet the details differ oddly. How that happened may not be easy to decide. We know that copyists corrupt numbers very easily, through carelessness or through boldness.
Another writer sets that explanation aside. He points to the register itself changing over time.
Some guess that copyists made mistakes. That guess is as easy to make as it is unlikely, so leave it aside. Notice first that Nehemiah's list of the leaders of the people contains a name, Nahamani (v. 7), which Ezra 2 does not mention. Second, the genealogical registers drawn up by Zerubbabel received updates over a longer or shorter period (see Neh. 12:23).
A third writer looks at the gap between signing up and setting out.
If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here and only 652 in Nehemiah. Probably 775 enrolled their names, but only 652 went.
- Recorded. God kept this list because He treasured what His grace produced in His people, down to the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work.
- Counted. Adonikam's 666 are a number on the page. But the Lord knew every one of them and sustained them on the journey home.
- Ominous. Six speaks of incompleteness, one short of seven. The same figure marks the beast of Revelation 13, though Ezra draws no such link.
- Completed. The rest of Adonikam's house came up later with Ezra. Their names were kept, so the whole family stands in God's book.
- Disputed. Commentators explain the differing totals in Nehemiah 7 as copying errors, as later updates to the register, or as names enrolled by people who never travelled.
The children of Bigvai, two thousand and fifty-six.
Ezra 2 is a ledger of the families who came back from Babylon to Jerusalem, each with a name at the head and a number after it. Verse 14 records one of the largest of those households — so why does God keep a list like this in His book at all?
Start with the fact that this register survives at all. One commentator finds meaning in that:
What this chapter leaves out matters as much as what it includes:
Apart from the last three verses, chapter two gives the numbers of those who answered the proclamation. It lists them under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record, while He passes over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.
The 2,056 people behind this line have no names on the page. That silence is not neglect:
The descendants of the various people are now given. Altogether we find 24,144 descendants. Their individual names are not recorded. But the Lord knows them all. He cared for each member and sustained them on the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory.
One writer sees God's own pleasure in a count like this:
All the same, is it not a precious truth that God takes pleasure in letting His people know that every one of them is prized by Him? A sad change had come through Israel's sin, through Judah's sin, and not least through the sin of David's house. Sin does give occasion for His grace, yet it cannot pass without man's humiliation. Faith takes account of both. But God always waits to bless. He waits to give His own the proof and the sense of His blessing. We see that even in the numbering of those who returned from Babylon.
The name in this verse turns up elsewhere in Scripture too:
Ancestor of some who returned from exile, one of whom, bearing the same name, sealed the covenant. Ezra 2:2, 14; Ezra 8:14; Neh. 7:7, 19; Neh. 10:16.
These figures were not statistics for their own sake. Who a person descended from decided whether he belonged:
So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Descent by birth in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God does to the Christian. Never before had such careful watchfulness been necessary. It mattered most among the priests, as we shall see. But it held for the people too. Only Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
The numbers in this chapter do not always match the same list in the book of Nehemiah. One commentator sees no reason for alarm:
If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are here 775, and in Nehemiah we find only 652 recorded.
He suggests one cause for that gap: "Probably 775 had enrolled their names but only 652 went."
- Preserved — God kept this list because the response His grace produced in His people was precious to Him. He records even the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work.
- Prized — by counting them, God lets His people know He values every one of them, even after sin had humbled them.
- Personally known — the page gives no names for these 2,056, but the Lord knew them all and sustained each one on the journey home.
- Proven — the count also served as a title deed. Descent in the line of promise was their claim to a place in the work.
- Passed over — the register says nothing about those who stayed in Babylon. It notes who went.
The children of Adin, four hundred and fifty-four.
Ezra 2:15 is one line in a long roll call: a family name, Adin, and a figure — 454. Why would God keep a clan name and a headcount in His Word? And what does a list like this say about the people who went home — and about those who stayed?
The chapter is a register of those who came back from exile to Judah. That the register exists at all is the first thing to notice.
Several things in this record are worth noticing. The first is that the list exists at all. Its existence shows how precious to God was the response which His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — even though they had only a weak grasp of His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list on record. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the names of His people are known and proclaimed, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times when everything is corrupt and people turn away from the truth.
A family head, then a figure: the pattern repeats down the chapter. What it leaves out matters as much as what it records.
Chapter two, apart from the last three verses, gives the number of those who answered the proclamation. It lists them under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record, while those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence. Let us take note of this.
Not one of Adin's 454 is named here. Yet the chapter shows how God keeps records.
This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a specimen page of the records God keeps. From it we may learn that He remembers His people. He knows them by name, and He does not forget their works. In the book of Nehemiah this list is repeated (chapter 7), with an added record of those who helped build the wall. He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16). The apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for His name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).
Nehemiah repeats this register (chapter 7), and some of its family totals come out differently. Commentators differ on why. One treats the difference as real and explainable:
Scripture does not record their individual names, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each one and sustained them on the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For example, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, and Nehemiah records only 652. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.
Another points instead to how figures fare in hand-copied manuscripts:
On the whole the lists agree. The overall total in both is the same, yet the details differ sharply. How that happened may not be easy to decide. We know that numbers are especially easy to corrupt, through a copyist's carelessness or rashness. … How good it is for the heart to know that the living God takes a real interest not only in His people, but in all that is theirs!
Add up every family in the chapter and the total looks tiny beside Israel's past. Here is the objection, stated plainly:
"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then the people must have grown. And now there are just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be."
Here is faith's reply:
But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.
- Grace first. The return was "the response which His grace had produced." God records even "the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work."
- Named, therefore noticed. God put the names of those who went into His record. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go, He passes over in silence.
- A specimen page. This roll is "a specimen page of the records God keeps." He remembers His people, knows them by name, and does not forget their works.
- Names, not numbers. Some totals differ in Nehemiah's copy. Commentators explain this in different ways, but "the Lord knows them all."
- 454 is enough. Small numbers were the argument against going up. Faith answers by looking "at God's word," not at the total.
The children of Ater of [the family of] Hezekiah, ninety-eight.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
The children of Bezai, three hundred and twenty-three.
Ezra 2:17 sits inside a long list of families who left Babylon and travelled back to Jerusalem: the name Bezai, and the number 323. Why would God preserve a line like this at all?
One writer starts from the fact that this record exists at all.
The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. Its existence shows how precious to God the response was that His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. That is true however feebly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has made sure this list was preserved. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and decay.
Bezai appears three times in Scripture, and the second and third appearances tell us the family did not stop at the journey home.
One whose descendants returned from exile, and one who sealed the covenant. Ezra 2:17; Neh. 7:23; Neh. 10:18.
Most of the names in this chapter mean nothing to a reader today.
This very long chapter mainly consists of lists of names, most of them completely unknown to us. But God is pleased to take account of those who took this great step, those who went up out of the captivity, to Jerusalem (v.1).
Each figure in this list represents a family that had weighed up real arguments for staying in Babylon — comfort, custom, and the smallness of the group going back. One commentator sets out the objection and answers it:
"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then, the people must have grown. And now there were just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be." But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.
A list of fathers' names was how a returning family proved its right to be there at all.
So we see that the remnant are careful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Genealogy according to the flesh in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Never before had such jealous care been necessary, above all where it was needed most — in the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people too: only Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
The captivity in Babylon had completed the confusion that sin had caused long before. But those who feared the Lord were all the more careful, in a way that was not needed in the days when everything was known and in order.
Nehemiah repeats this roll in his seventh chapter, and some of the totals there are not the same. One commentator suggests a simple explanation:
Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each member and sustained them on the journey homeward. Even so He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, and in Nehemiah only 652 are recorded. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went. All the names recorded can be traced in other parts of Scripture.
The same writer reads the whole chapter as a sample page from a larger book God keeps.
This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a specimen page of the records God keeps. From it we may learn that He remembers His people. He knows them by name, and He does not forget their works. In the book of Nehemiah this list is repeated (chapter 7), with an added record of those who helped build the wall. He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16). The apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for His name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).
- Counted by name. Bezai's family is in Scripture because God kept the record of those who answered His call. He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work.
- Counted, not famous. Most names here mean nothing to us; God takes account of those who took the step anyway.
- Counted, not crowded. 323 out of a nation is a small figure, and faith looks at God's word rather than at the numbers.
- Counted as qualified. Descent had to be clear, because only Israelites could be allowed to build the temple of the God of Israel.
- Counted for keeping. This list is a specimen page of the records God keeps. His book of remembrance does not overlook work done for His name.
The children of Jorah, a hundred and twelve.
Ezra 2 lists the families who came home from exile in Babylon, and this verse is one line of it: a name, then a figure of 112. Commentators ask why God kept such a list, and why some names are in it and others are not.
One writer sees the survival of this list as proof of how God valued the people who answered His call to return:
The very fact that this list exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have grasped His thoughts about His house only weakly. That is why He has kept this list on record. It proves that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also proves that He knows the names of His people and makes them known. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and turning away from God.
This same family seems to appear under a different name in a later list. The ancestor in Nehemiah 7:24 is "apparently called JORAH in Ezra 2:18" (Morrish Bible Dictionary). Each line in Ezra 2 names only the head of a house. The two lists do not always agree on the numbers, and one writer gives a simple reason:
after_note: DELETE
Scripture does not record their individual names, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each member and supported them on the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, while Nehemiah records only 652. Probably 775 had enrolled their names but only 652 went.
A line like "the sons of Jorah" was a claim that had to hold up. Those who came back guarded this carefully. One writer explains why:
So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Descent by natural birth in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to a Christian. Never before had such jealous care been necessary, and it mattered most in the priests. It was true of the people too: only Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
A list like this also says something by what it leaves out:
Apart from the last three verses, chapter two gives the number of those who answered the proclamation, family by family. It names the heads of the families and counts each family. God took note of them and put their names into His record. He passes over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.
Against the size of the nation the whole company was small, and 112 is one of the smaller entries in it:
The whole assembly totalled 42,360, plus servants and singers adding 7,537 to the number. This was only a small percentage of Judah and Benjamin, but the Lord took account of every one. Their 736 horses were nothing compared with Solomon's 40,000 stalls of horses (1 Kings 4:26). But at least Judah did have "a little strength" (compare Revelation 3:8, which the ESV renders "you have but little power").
- Counted because valued — God kept this list on record. It shows He treasures the response His grace produces, and looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work.
- Counted by family — the list names only the head of each house. Scripture leaves the rest unnamed, but the Lord knows them all and supported each one on the journey home.
- Counted as belonging — descent in the line of promise mattered to them as much as being born of God matters to a Christian. Only Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
- Not counted — God put the names of those who went into His record. He passes over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them to go.
- Counted though few — the company that returned was a small part of Judah and Benjamin. Yet the Lord took account of every one: little strength, noticed by God.
The children of Hashum, two hundred and twenty-three.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
The children of Gibbar, ninety-five.
One line in a long register of families who left Babylon for Judah: a family name and a count of ninety-five. Why does God keep such a list, and what does a small number say about the people behind it?
Why is a list of names and numbers in the Bible at all? One commentator starts there:
The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. Its existence shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — even if they grasped His thoughts about His house only feebly. That is why He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the names of His people and announces them. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways and to make His interests their own. It encourages them to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
Scripture never names these ninety-five people one by one. That silence is not neglect:
The descendants of the different people are now given. Altogether we find 24,144 descendants. Scripture does not record their individual names, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each member and supported them on the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For example, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, while Nehemiah records only 652. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.
To appear in this list, a family had to leave a settled life for a place strange to them. One writer puts the case that could have kept them in Babylon:
"We are settled in Babylon. We grew up here, and for some of us our parents grew up here too. We have got used to things. How can we leave everything behind, just to go to a place that is strange to us?"
Ninety-five is a small number, and so was the whole returning company. One writer states the objection and then answers it:
"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then the people must have grown. And now there are only 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be."
But faith does not look to numbers for guidance; it looks at God's word.
Verse 20 sits in the first of four groups in this register:
Looking at this list a little more closely, we find a fourfold division. Down to the end of verse 42 it describes those who were undoubtedly of Israel — of Judah, Benjamin, or of Levi, and among the Levites both singers and gatekeepers. Then follow two other classes, the Nethinim and the servants of Solomon. The word Nethinim seems to mean "those who are given."
Descent decided who could share in the work ahead, so those who returned watched it closely:
So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand clear and simple as sons of the covenant. Natural descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Such careful attention had never been so necessary, and it was needed most among the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people as well: only Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel. The ruin of the church in no way destroys its divine principles. On the contrary, in view of that ruin Scripture insists on greater care in holding fast to the word.
The question this list put to each returning family has a present form:
Then they found the answer. Only those who could "show their father's house," or could find "their register," had the scriptural qualification for a place at the table of the Lord. The same holds for us. We must have peace with God. We must know that we are children of God because we have the Spirit of adoption. Only then can we show our Father's house and trace our descent. Without that we do not have the title God looks for. Profession is not enough.
- Recorded — God valued the response His grace produced. So He kept the list, as a record of the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work.
- Known — Scripture never names the ninety-five one by one. Yet the Lord knows them all, and He carried each one on the journey home.
- Costly — Every entry stands for a family that gave up a settled life in Babylon. They went to a place strange to them.
- Small — Numbers are no measure of being right. Faith looks to God's word, not to the size of the company.
- Proven — Descent mattered then; being born of God matters now. Only those who can show their Father's house have the title. Profession alone is not enough.
The children of Bethlehem, a hundred and twenty-three.
This verse is one line in a long register of families coming home from Babylon: a town and a number. Why would God keep such a list, and why does the town matter?
The chapter lists the people who left Babylon and came back to Judah. One commentator sees God's own joy behind the record:
He has kept this list on record. It is proof that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows too that He knows the very names of His people and proclaims them. That encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to be openly on His side, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and turning away from God.
Notice what the verse leaves out: it names none of the 123. The register gives a town or an ancestor, then a figure. The silence is not neglect:
Their individual names are not recorded but the Lord knows them all, and cared for each member and sustained them in the journey homeward. Even so He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory.
From here the register groups people by their home towns instead of by a family head. Bethlehem comes first, and the town carries more weight than its size suggests:
David was anointed in the house of Jesse the Bethlehemite, so it seems the town was his birthplace. That is why Luke 2:11 calls it the "city of David." It was also the birthplace of Jesus. Though it was "too little to be among the clans of Judah," that agreed all the better with His humiliation. Beth-lehem means "house of bread." That is a very fitting name for the place the Saviour would come from as a man — He who was the living bread that came down from heaven.
So the 123 were resettling the town where the Saviour would be born.
The chapter opens by saying each man returned to his own city. It ends with them settled in those towns, not crowded into Jerusalem. What matters is not the size of each group but what it meant:
The temple would have meant little if no one lived in the cities of Judah. The numbers in those cities would be small compared with their size before the captivity. Even so, each city would be a testimony to the restoring grace of God. Today too, each little assembly that God restores is a testimony to His grace and faithfulness. But such testimonies give us no reason for pride.
A number like 123 raises an objection. If the return was God's will, why did so few come home? One writer answers the charge that a minority cannot be right:
Faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but to God's word.
Nehemiah later records the same return, and some of his figures do not match Ezra's. One commentator suggests a reason:
If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, and in Nehemiah only 652. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.
Later in the chapter some could not produce their family record, and they lost their place. These lists of families and towns settled who counted as an Israelite:
So we see that the remnant are careful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Their family descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Such jealous care had never been so necessary… only Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
Another writer applies this to a later day. A time of weakness "was not to be a day of negligence but of the greatest care." God's people were to be "as watchful and vigilant for His name as when things were in the full power and beauty of divine order."
- Counted — God kept this list. He takes joy in the smallest results of His own work, and He makes His people's names known.
- Known — the verse names no one, yet the Lord knew each of the 123 and carried them the whole way home. A number to us is a person to Him.
- Placed — they went back to Bethlehem, the little town of David and the future birthplace of the Saviour, the "house of bread."
- Few — a tiny group in a half-empty town was still a testimony to restoring grace. Faith measures by God's word, not by headcount.
- Proven — descent had to be provable, not assumed; a day of weakness called for more care about who belonged, not less.
The men of Netophah, fifty-six.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
The men of Anathoth, a hundred and twenty-eight.
Ezra 2 lists the people who returned from exile in Babylon, and verse 23 is one line of it: a town and a number. Why keep such a list at all, and why should 128 men from one small village be worth a verse of Scripture?
The register itself teaches something before any of its numbers do:
The first thing to notice is this. The very fact that this record exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only feebly into His thoughts about His house. Even so, He has caused this list to be preserved. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the names of His people are known and proclaimed, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
And what God writes down, He does not forget:
This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a specimen page of the records God keeps, and from which we may learn that He remembers His people, whom He knows by name and whose works are not forgotten by Him.
Verse 23 does not name an ancestor. It names a place — and that shift partway through the chapter is deliberate:
From verse 3 to verse 20 of chapter 2, the people are listed by the name of their fathers. From verse 21 to verse 34 they are listed by the name of their cities. Those listed by their cities went back to live in and re-people the cities they came from, once they had returned to Palestine.
So these 128 are not just travellers counted at a border. They are a town filling up again.
Anathoth was the home of the prophet Jeremiah, and it belonged to the priests:
Jeremiah is known as a prophet, but he belonged to the family of "the priests who were in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin." As far as we know, he never acted as a priest. His village of Anathoth lay a little over three miles northeast of Jerusalem. It had been given to the priests, the descendants of Aaron, of the family of the Kohathites (Josh. 21:18; 1 Chron. 6:60). Abiathar the priest came from Anathoth (1 Kings 2:26). In Zerubbabel's time 128 of its people came back from captivity under the edict of Cyrus, king of Persia, and filled the village again.
The name itself carries a lesson:
Anathoth means "afflictions," and it answers to the cross. We have to take up our cross — how different to His, however — and to follow Him.
128 is a small number. So was the whole company, beside what Judah had once been:
To the casual observer it must have seemed quite a small matter: about 42,000 Jews restored to the land of their fathers under the leadership of Zerubbabel (Ezra 2). In the days of Jehoshaphat, Judah could keep a standing army of 1,160,000 men. Beside that, the returned remnant was poor indeed (2 Chron. 17:12-18). It was "a day of small things," as Zech. 4:10 expresses it.
What made the small number significant was not its size but its direction:
Still there was a definite revival, and the first mark of it was this: they got back to God's original centre. Compared with the whole number of scattered Jews they were only a few. Many worldly people may have nicknamed them "Zerubbabelites." They were not that. They were simply a few who cared for their God and sought His original centre.
Why count so carefully? Descent decided who could take part in the work:
after
So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Physical descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Never had such jealous care been so necessary... But it was true of the people: none but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
- Recorded. God kept this list because He treasures even the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work. He knows His people by name, and this chapter is one page of His records.
- Rooted. From verse 21 on, the count goes by town, not by ancestor. These men went back to re-people the place they came from.
- Restored. Anathoth was a priests' village in Benjamin. It was Jeremiah's home, and these 128 men filled it again after the exile.
- Reduced. Beside Judah's old army of over a million, the whole company was tiny. It was a day of small things, and 128 is one line of it.
- Reckoned. Numbers were not the point. They stood clear as sons of the covenant, and only Israelites could build the temple of the God of Israel.
The children of Azmaveth, forty-two.
Ezra's list names whole villages and counts the families who came home from exile, and here one small place accounts for forty-two people. Why would God keep such small numbers in Scripture at all?
The name in this verse is not a father but a location, tucked between the towns of two tribes.
A village lying on the borders of Judah and Benjamin. Ezra 2:24; Neh. 12:29. Called BETH-AZMAVETH in Neh. 7:28.
So the forty-two are a village count, and the same place appears as Beth-Azmaveth in Nehemiah. That same care marks the whole chapter.
This chapter shows the definite interest God had in every individual who returned from the captivity. That is why it records the number from each city, and the total number as well.
The list's survival shows how God viewed what His people had done.
The first thing to notice is this. The very fact that such a list exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people, however feebly they had entered into His thoughts about His house. That is why He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the names of His people and makes them known, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
Others read the chapter as one page out of a much larger set of records God keeps.
This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a specimen page of the records God keeps. From it we may learn that He remembers His people. He knows them by name, and He does not forget their works... He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16). The apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for His name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).
One writer puts the case for staying, in the words the exiles themselves might have used.
"We are settled in Babylon. We have been brought up here and, for some of us, our parents have been brought up here. We have got used to things. How can we leave everything behind, just to go to what is a strange place to us?"
Those who overcame that reasoning ended up in the register; the rest vanished from view.
God has made sure of this. The names of those who roused themselves to answer His call to return to the land stand on record in a very lasting way. The names of those who did not rouse themselves are almost entirely lost.
The totals in this chapter also settle a larger question about what the return was and was not.
The second chapter makes plain something we must grasp to understand the prophecies of the Old Testament. Only a remnant came back out of the captivity of Babylon, and a small remnant at that — some 43,000 or a little less, mainly from Judah and Benjamin. Out of the ten tribes there came only stragglers... This is proof that the return was not the fulfilment of the prophecies, but only a partial accomplishment.
Small numbers tempt people to think little of their own work. One writer shows where that state of mind leaves them.
They are now shown that, in this state of mind, they were not in fellowship with the mind and heart of God. The question was not how glorious their work looked, but what God thought about it... So let us learn, along with these returned captives, that the lowliest service, however plain it looks from outside, deserves all our devotion and zeal if the mind and heart of God are upon it.
- Place — Azmaveth was a village on the border of Judah and Benjamin. The forty-two are one small settlement's share in the return, not one man's family.
- Counted — God took a definite interest in every person who came back. That is why the list gives the figure for each town.
- Preserved — The list survives as evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, feeble as the people's grasp of His house was.
- Remembered — The chapter is a specimen page of God's own records. He knows His people by name, and He does not forget their work and their love.
- Weighed — The worth of any service is not how big it looks, but what God thinks of it. So even the least visible work deserves our whole zeal.
The children of Kirjath-arim, Chephirah, and Beeroth, seven hundred and forty-three.
A single line in a long register: three towns named together, and 743 people counted between them. Why does Scripture keep such a record? And why do these towns, with a past reaching back to Joshua, appear among those who came home from Babylon?
This chapter records those who came back from exile, each to his own town. One writer sees the very existence of such a list as proof of what their response meant to God.
The first thing to notice is that this list exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people, however feebly they entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He kept the list on record. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the names of His people and announces them. That encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
The roll shifts its shape as it goes.
Verses 3 to 35 count the people of various cities. Verses 36 to 39 add priests to the number of those returning. Verse 43 brings in the Nethinim, whose total number was 392. Ezra 8:20 says David appointed them to serve the Levites; they were probably Gibeonites whom Joshua had received (Joshua 9:23).
So these 743 stand under their town names. Beeroth, the third name, has a history worth tracing.
One of the four cities of the Hivites which deceived Joshua into making a treaty of peace. It belonged to Benjamin (Joshua 9:17; Joshua 18:25). It is identified with Bireh, about 7 miles north of Jerusalem. People of the city were called Beerothites, and 'children' or 'men of Beeroth' on returning from exile (Ezra 2:25; Neh. 7:29).
Kiriath-arim (Kiriath-jearim), Chephirah and Beeroth are not a random cluster. They were Gibeon's allies, the people who tricked Israel into a peace treaty.
These allied peoples included the Hivites, who had four cities: Gibeon, Chephirah, Beeroth, and Kirjath-jearim. The heads of these cities planned together. Others of their nation reached for the sword, but these men used a trick to get what they wanted.
That trick cost them their freedom. It also tied them for good to the place of God's worship.
It is true that God allowed them to bear a certain mark of degradation as a result. Slavery was the only course left open righteously… After the treaty, to put them to death would have been fresh sin, a crime. The name of the Lord had been solemnly given, and no one can ever trifle with that. On the other hand, the Gibeonites were brought down to the lowest services for the sanctuary of the Lord. So it was made plain that nothing preserved them but His name. They were attached to the sanctuary, but with the brand of slavery on them.
Centuries later, men from those towns are back to build the temple. The Nethinim counted further down this same roll were probably Gibeonites too.
One writer draws out what all this counting was for.
So we see that the remnant are careful to stand simple and clear as sons of the covenant. Physical descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Never before had such careful watchfulness been needed… none but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
The same writer presses why a wrecked situation calls for more care, not less.
The Babylonian captivity had completed the confusion which sin had caused long before. But those who feared the Lord took more care than was needed in the days when everything was known and in order. Restoration is always difficult. True grace submits to Scripture. The flesh always craves what we do not have, despises what we do have, and attempts imitations, substitutes and inventions of its own.
One writer sets another register beside the rolls of earthly towns.
Our citizenship is in heaven. No one will have the privilege of entering the gates of the holy city, the new Jerusalem, except those whose names are written in the Lamb's book of life. That is the heavenly register of saints, called with a holy calling. It never goes through the periodic cancellations that the often faulty citizen-rolls of earthly cities go through.
- Counted because prized. God kept this list as evidence that He "looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work."
- Counted by home. From verse 3 the roll groups people by their cities. Beeroth lay in Benjamin, about seven miles north of Jerusalem.
- Counted though once enemies. These three were Hivite cities that tricked Joshua. Nothing preserved them but the Lord's name, and it tied them to His sanctuary.
- Counted, therefore checked. Descent in the line of promise mattered: "none but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel." Ruin called for more care over Scripture, not less.
- Counted in heaven. Earthly rolls could be cancelled; the Lamb's book of life cannot.
The children of Ramah and Geba, six hundred and twenty-one.
This verse is one line in a long roll call of the people who came back from exile in Babylon. It raises two questions: why does God keep such a list at all, and why does the list count these families by their hometowns?
The list itself is the first thing to notice. One writer reads it as evidence of what God treasures:
That this list exists at all shows how precious to God was the response which His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only weakly into His thoughts about His house. Even so, He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. He knows the names of His people, and He proclaims them. All this encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
The chapter counts in two ways, and this verse belongs to the second. The switch matches what these families went back to do:
Verses 3 to 20 of chapter 2 list them by the name of their fathers. Verses 21 to 34 list them by the name of their cities. Those listed by their cities went to live in and re-people the cities they came from, once they had returned to Palestine. Nehemiah 7:5 tells us that the whole people was entered in a register by their genealogies.
Both towns sat in Benjamin. Ramah stood on the border between the two kingdoms, and kings fought over it:
City of Benjamin. It was on the frontier between Judah and Israel. Baasha, king of Israel, tried to build up the place as a fort against Asa, king of Judah. But Asa asked the king of Syria for help, and Syria attacked Israel, so the plan came to nothing... Called RAMA in Matthew 2:18.
Geba appears in this verse under a different spelling, and it had a particular standing among Benjamin's towns:
Levitical city in Benjamin... It seems that while Saul was king the Philistines kept a garrison there, and Jonathan struck it down. 1 Samuel 13:3. Long afterwards Asa built or rebuilt the city. It is called GABA in Joshua 18:24, Ezra 2:26 and Nehemiah 7:30, and GIBEAH in 1 Samuel 13:2-16 and 14:2-16.
The 621 of this verse is a small number, and so is the whole company. Set against the nation's past strength, the return looks tiny:
To a casual observer it must have seemed quite a small matter — about 42,000 Jews brought back to the land of their fathers under the leadership of Zerubbabel (Ezra 2). Remember that in the days of Jehoshaphat Judah could keep a standing army of 1,160,000 men. Next to that, the returned remnant was poor indeed (2 Chronicles 17:12-18). It was "a day of small things," as Zechariah 4:10 puts it.
Yet filling each town again mattered. Its small size is no reason for shame, and no reason for pride:
The temple would have meant little if no one lived in the cities of Judah. The numbers in the cities would be small compared with their size before the captivity. Even so, each city would be a testimony to the restoring grace of God. It is the same today. Each little assembly that God restores is a testimony to His grace and faithfulness. Yet such testimonies are far from being an occasion for our own pride.
The list names those who went. It leaves out those who stayed behind, and that silence says something:
Apart from its last three verses, chapter two gives the numbers of those who answered the proclamation, named under the heads of their families. The list names the heads and counts the families. God took note of them and put their names into His record. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go He passes over in silence. Let us take note of this.
- Kept. God kept this list because the response His grace produced in His people was precious to Him. He notices the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and He makes the names known.
- Placed. From verse 21 on, the list counts the families by their towns, not by their fathers. They were going back to live in the cities they came from.
- Located. Ramah and Geba both stood in Benjamin. Ramah was a border town, called Rama in Matthew 2:18. Geba was a Levitical city, and Asa rebuilt it.
- Few. 621 here, and some 42,000 in all. Jehoshaphat once had an army of over a million. This was a day of small things.
- Named. Every town filled again was a witness to God's restoring grace. Those whose hearts never stirred them to go have no name in the list.
The men of Michmas, a hundred and twenty-two.
Ezra 2 counts the people who came home from Babylon, town by town, and this verse is one line of that count. Why would God keep a headcount from one small village in Benjamin?
One writer sees in the survival of this chapter a sign of how much the people's response meant to God:
Notice this first. The very existence of this record shows how precious to God was the response of His people. His grace had produced that response in their hearts, however weakly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list safe. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the very names of His people and announces them. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to take His interests as their own, and to stay faithful in times of corruption.
Michmas, also spelled Michmash, had a history before this list. It had already appeared in Israel's story as a battlefield:
City and mountain pass in the tribe of Benjamin. It was where Jonathan struck down the Philistine garrison. The victory might have been greater, but Saul distressed the people by forbidding them to eat until evening. Men of this town returned from the exile.
The chapter names heads of families and tallies the people under them. What it leaves out is as telling as what it records:
Chapter two, apart from the last three verses, gives details of the number of those who answered the proclamation. It names them under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record, while He passes over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.
This verse counts the men of Michmas by their town, not by their family head. One writer comments on these towns of Judah and Benjamin, where the returning families settled again:
There again the order is not perfect; Judah even goes a little beyond their limits at Beer-sheba. Yet alongside these defects there was a real desire in each one to occupy the place God assigned to him.
This count sits inside a chapter concerned with proof of descent. One writer explains what was at stake:
So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand simple and clear as sons of the covenant. Descent by birth in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Never had such careful watchfulness been so necessary. It was needed most among the priests. But it was true of the people as well: no one but Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
The same register appears again in Nehemiah, and some totals differ between the two accounts. One writer suggests a simple reason:
Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all, and cared for each one and sustained them on the journey home. Even so He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, and in Nehemiah only 652 are recorded. Probably 775 had enrolled their names but only 652 went.
- Recorded — God wanted His people's response written down, so the list survives. He notices the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work.
- Named — God named and numbered those who went, and left those who stayed behind in silence.
- Placed — Michmas was a real town in Benjamin with a real history, and its 122 men went back to the place God had assigned them.
- Proven — The count sits in a chapter about proving descent. The returning people took care to stand clear as sons of the covenant.
- Known — The 122 men are never named one by one. Yet the Lord knew each of them, cared for each, and brought them home.
The men of Bethel and Ai, two hundred and twenty-three.
One line in a long roll call: 223 men, counted by their home town instead of by their ancestor. Both towns carry a heavy past — one had been Israel's chief centre of idol worship, the other a burnt heap — so why does God keep the count at all?
Chapter 2 is a register of those who came back from Babylon. One writer finds it striking that such a list exists at all:
The very fact that this list exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have grasped His thoughts about His house only weakly. Still, for this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows that He knows the names of His people and makes them known, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and turning away from God.
The list has a silence in it too:
God took note of them and put their names into His record, while He passes over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.
Verse 28 sits in a distinct block of the chapter, where the labels change:
There were 24,144 people who returned from the captivity under the leadership of Zerubbabel and Jeshua, the high priest, helped by nine chief men. Verses 3 to 20 of chapter 2 list them by their fathers' names. Verses 21 to 34 list them by the names of their cities. Those listed by their cities went to live in and re-people their home cities, once they had returned to Palestine.
So these 223 form a resettlement group, listed by the ground they were going back to.
The name itself is a promise, and its history is a warning:
Bethel means "House of God." The place was sacred, because there God showed Himself to Jacob and in grace pledged Himself to His servant (Gen. 28:10-22). Now one of Jeroboam's calf idols stood there (1 Kings 12:28-29). So Jehovah spoke of the place with contempt as Bethaven — "house of folly" (Hosea 4:15).
Yet men from that town stand on this list of returning exiles.
Ai's name matches its fate. One writer says the name "means 'ruins'", and that "Abraham built his altar between Bethel (House of God) and Ai" (Arno Clemens Gaebelein). A dictionary fills in what happened to the city later:
Ai was a royal city of Canaan. Joshua conquered it by a clever plan, after the sin of Achan had caused an earlier defeat. He burned it and made it a "heap." Joshua 7:2-5; Joshua 8:1-29; Joshua 10:1-2. It stood near Bethel, in the land given to Benjamin, and it was apparently rebuilt, since Ezra 2:28 and Nehemiah 7:32 mention it.
Commentators place Bethel differently. The dictionary puts it in Benjamin's land. Another writer puts it in Ephraim, in the north, and draws a conclusion from that:
Are we to suppose that in the return of God's people to the land in Ezra's and Nehemiah's time only those belonging to the southern kingdom returned? There is evidence that in some cases it was not so. Ezra 2:28, for instance, tells us of 223 men of Bethel and Ai returning. Bethel was in Ephraim, and it was the centre of the idol worship set up by Jeroboam.
Next to the whole scattered nation, this return was small:
Still there was a definite revival, and the first mark of it was this: they got back to God's original centre. Compared with the whole number of scattered Jews they were only a few. Many worldly people may have nicknamed them "Zerubbabelites." Yet they were not that. They were just a few who cared for their God and sought His original centre.
- Named. God kept this register because He values the response His grace produces. He takes joy in the smallest fruit of His work.
- Unnamed. The silence speaks too. God passes over those whose hearts did not move them to go.
- Ruined. Bethel had sunk from "house of God" to "house of folly," and Joshua had burned Ai into a heap — yet both towns supply men for this list.
- Rebuilt. Counted by city, not by ancestor, these 223 went back to re-people their own ground — the town Joshua burned was standing again.
- Recentred. The mark of a real revival here is not size but direction — a few who cared for their God and got back to His original centre.
The children of Nebo, fifty-two.
Fifty-two people from one small town sit inside a long list of those who came back from Babylon to Judah. Why does God keep a record this detailed? And why are these people counted under a town name instead of a father's name?
Commentators say the first thing to notice about this list is that it exists at all.
This list exists, and that alone shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only weakly into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list safe. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows too that He knows the very names of His people and announces them. That is an encouragement to everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption.
The chapter counts a whole company, and part way through it the pattern of the list changes. Nebo belongs to the second half.
24,144 people returned from the captivity. Zerubbabel and Jeshua (or Joshua) the high priest led them, helped by nine chief men. Verses 3 to 20 of chapter 2 list them by the name of their fathers. Verses 21 to 34 list them by the name of their cities. Those listed by their cities went back to live in their home towns and fill them again, once they had returned to Palestine.
So "the sons of Nebo" does not mean a man's descendants. A reference work on Bible names sums up what the place was:
A city whose inhabitants or 'children' returned from exile.
A list like this has two sides. It names those who went. Its silence covers those who did not.
Apart from the last three verses, chapter two gives the number of those who answered the proclamation. It names them under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record. But He passed over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.
Figures like fifty-two, forty-two, and fifty-six make the whole return look tiny — and the writers admit the objection openly, putting it in the mouth of a critic:
"How can a minority be right? When Israel left Egypt, they were 600,000 men plus families. When they entered the land of Canaan, they were about the same number. Since then, the people must have grown. And now there were just 43,000 who think Jerusalem is the place to be."
The answer given is short:
But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.
Commentators note how carefully the returning people guarded their line of descent.
after-note: DELETE-NOT-USED
So we see that the remnant are careful to stand clear and unmistakable as sons of the covenant. Descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God does to the Christian. Such careful watching had never been so necessary. It was needed most where it mattered most: in the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people too: none but Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
Others draw the same principle out as a demand for reality rather than profession. One writer applies it to a day when the church is in confusion: "we are entitled to demand that they shall prove their genealogy… because now people generally take the place of Christians without reality."
- Grace first. The return came from God's grace working in His people. He kept this list because He values the smallest fruit of His own work.
- Register. This verse is one line of that list: fifty-two people from the town of Nebo. From verse 21 on, the list groups families by home town, because they went back to fill those towns again.
- Recorded. God wrote down the names of those who answered the call. Those who stayed in Babylon go unnamed.
- Few. Small numbers can make the return look like a failing minority. Faith takes its direction from God's word, not from a head count.
- Proven. What descent was to them, being born of God is to the Christian. It has to be real, not just claimed.
The children of Magbish, a hundred and fifty-six.
One line in a long list: a family or town called Magbish sends 156 people home from exile to Judah. Why would God keep a written record of so small a group, and what does it mean that they are counted by place rather than by ancestor?
The very survival of this list says something about God before it says anything about the people in it:
The first thing to notice is this. The very existence of this record shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only feebly into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
Magbish sits in a stretch of the list where the pattern changes. Earlier entries name an ancestor; these name a place. The change marks where these people were going:
24,144 people (Ezra 2:1-35) returned from the captivity. Zerubbabel and Jeshua (or Joshua) the high priest led them, helped by nine chief men. From verse 3 to verse 20 of this chapter, the list names them by their fathers. From verse 21 to verse 34 it names them by their cities. Those listed by their cities went to live in and re-people the cities they came from, once they had returned to Palestine. The whole people was registered by their genealogies, as Nehemiah 7:5 tells us.
The same roll appears again in Nehemiah 7, and the figures there do not always agree with Ezra's. One writer offers a plain explanation:
Their individual names are not recorded, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each one and sustained them on the journey homeward. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are here 775, and in Nehemiah we find only 652 recorded. Probably 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.
Magbish's 156 is a small number, and the whole company was small too:
The whole assembly totalled 42,360, plus servants and singers adding 7,537 to the number. This was only a small percentage of Judah and Benjamin, but the Lord took account of every one.
The towns they returned to were small as well:
The numbers in the cities would be small compared with their size before the captivity. Yet each city would be a testimony to the restoring grace of God. Today also, each little assembly that God restores is a testimony to His grace and faithfulness. But such testimonies give us no reason for pride. We are thankful for God's goodness, and our own weakness only humbles us.
For these families, the register was not mere bookkeeping:
So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand simple and clear as sons of the covenant. Genealogy according to the flesh in the line of promise was as important to them as being born of God is to the Christian. Never had such careful watchfulness been so necessary. This mattered most of all in the priests, but it was true of the people too: only Israelites could be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
Another writer applies this to Christians today:
The answer was found: only those who could "show their father's house," or could find "their register," had the scriptural qualification for a place at the table of the Lord. In other words, we must have peace with God. We must know that we are children of God through having the Spirit of adoption, so that we can show our Father's house and trace our genealogy. Without that, we do not have the divine title required. Profession is not enough.
- Recorded — The list survives because God delights in the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. He makes the names of His people known, to encourage others to stay faithful.
- Reckoned — The returning company was only a small part of Judah and Benjamin. Yet the Lord took account of every one.
- Rooted — From verse 21 onward the list names people by their city, not their father. They were going back to re-people the towns they came from.
- Reviewed — Ezra's figures sometimes differ from Nehemiah's. One suggested reason: more people enrolled their names than went.
- Recognised — A place in the register had to be proved, not just claimed. Commentators apply this to the Christian: profession alone is not enough.
The children of the other Elam, a thousand two hundred and fifty-four.
This verse is a single line in a long register. It names a second family called Elam — one Elam has already appeared earlier in the chapter — and counts 1,254 people beside the name. Why does God fill a chapter of Scripture with names and numbers? And why does He write this family into it?
One writer starts with the fact that this list has survived at all:
The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only weakly into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It is evidence too that He knows and announces the very names of His people, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
Verse 31 sits in the second half of the register. One writer sets out how the chapter is arranged:
24,144 people returned from the captivity (Ezra 2:1-35). Zerubbabel and Jeshua (or Joshua), the high priest, led them, helped by nine chief men. Verses 3 to 20 of chapter 2 list them by the name of their fathers. Verses 21 to 34 list them by the name of their cities. The families listed by their cities went back to live in their home cities and fill them with people again, once they had returned to Palestine. Nehemiah 7:5 tells us that the whole people was registered according to their genealogies.
The chapter counts those who came. Another writer notices who is missing from it:
Chapter two, apart from the last three verses, gives the number of those who answered the proclamation. It names them under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record, while those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence. Let us take note of this.
To be listed here, a family had to show it belonged to Israel. That was not bureaucracy; it decided who could build God's house at all:
So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Being able to trace their descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to a Christian. Such careful attention had never been so necessary, above all in the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people too: none but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
Names like this one were checked with a strictness their ancestors had never used. The captivity itself had taught them why:
In earlier days one priest followed another with no examination beforehand. No one checked genealogy, and children came into their father's place and enjoyed the privileges God had granted them. But Israel now, through the great grace of God, had to recover their position. This was not the beginning of their history, nor the power suited to a beginning. It was a return, and from now on the disorder that sin had brought in could not be endured. So even among those who had come back to Judea, anyone who could not produce his genealogy was set aside. It was weakness, but it was faithfulness.
One writer applies this to his own readers:
But what I call your attention to is this principle. It was a day of weakness and humiliation. Even so, it was not to be a day of negligence but of the greatest care. God's people were to be as watchful for His name as when things were in the full power and beauty of divine order. I hold this to be very precious for ourselves now.
- Recorded. God kept the list because He treasured what His grace had produced in His people, even though they grasped His purpose only in part.
- Counted. God named and numbered every family who came, and passed over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them to go.
- Placed. The register runs first by fathers' names, then by cities, so returning families could fill their home towns again.
- Proved. Each family had to prove its descent, and only Israelites could build the temple of the God of Israel.
- Applied. A day of weakness calls for the same watchfulness as the days of full order, not for slack standards.
The children of Harim, three hundred and twenty.
One line in a long roll of families: the sons of Harim, counted at 320, among those who left Babylon for Jerusalem. A chapter of names and numbers raises a simple question. Why would God keep one household's name and an exact figure on record for all to read?
One writer starts from the mere fact that such a list survives at all:
The first thing to notice is this. The fact that such a record exists shows how precious to God the response of His people was. His grace had produced that response in their hearts, however feebly they had entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the very names of His people and proclaims them, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
The same list also speaks by what it leaves out:
The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record. He passed over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.
A count of 320 looks like a dry detail. Yet one writer finds God's pleasure in such numbering:
Is it not a precious truth that God takes pleasure in letting His people know that He prizes every one of them? A sad change had come through Israel's sin and Judah's sin, and not least through the sin of David's house. Sin gives occasion to His grace, yet it cannot be without man's humiliation. Faith takes account of both. But God always waits to bless and to give His own the proof and sense of His blessing — as we see even in the numbering of those who returned from Babylon.
Harim's people appear as a family line. Every group in the list had to be clear about where it came from:
So we see that the remnant are careful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Descent according to the flesh in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God does to the Christian. No time had ever called for such careful watchfulness, and it was needed most among the priests. It was true of the people too: only Israelites could have a part in building a temple to the God of Israel.
Set beside Israel's earlier strength, figures in the hundreds look tiny:
To a casual observer, the return of about 42,000 Jews to the land of their fathers under Zerubbabel must have seemed a small matter. In the days of Jehoshaphat, Judah could keep a standing army of 1,160,000 men. Beside that, the returned remnant was poor indeed. It was "the day of small things," as Zechariah 4:10 puts it.
So what should guide a small company? One writer answers plainly:
But faith does not look to the numbers for guidance, but at God's word.
Nehemiah repeats this register, and some of its totals do not match Ezra's. Commentators differ on why. One points to a gap between those who enrolled and those who went:
The list does not give their individual names, but the Lord knows them all. He cared for each one and carried them through the journey home. In the same way He knows all His sheep and keeps every member of His body, leading them home to glory. If some of the numbers do not agree with Nehemiah's record, there is no doubt a good reason for it. For instance, the descendants of Arah are 775 here, while Nehemiah records only 652. Most likely 775 had enrolled their names, but only 652 went.
Another writer points to copying as one known source of such slips, without settling the matter there:
The overall total in both is the same, yet the details differ oddly, and how this happened may not be easy to decide. We know that numbers are very easy to corrupt, whether through a careless copyist or a bold one... To put such frequent and marked differences down to a copyist's mistake is a hard saying.
- Called. This verse sits in a list of people who left Babylon at God's call. The list itself proves their response mattered to Him.
- Counted. God numbers His people because they are His. The count of 320 says He prizes every one of them.
- Named. God names those who went for all time. He passes over those who stayed in silence.
- Proven. Harim's household stands in the roll as sons of the covenant. Each family had to show clear descent before sharing in the work.
- Small. The totals are tiny beside Israel's former strength. Faith takes its direction from God's word, not from the size of the company.
The children of Lod, Hadid, and Ono, seven hundred and twenty-five.
Verse 33 is a single line in the register of those who came back from exile: 725 people from the towns of Lod, Hadid, and Ono. Why does Scripture keep a roll of small towns and their numbers?
The list is not built in one way throughout. Part of it counts people by the city they came from, and verse 33 sits in that part.
Verses 3 to 35 count the people of the various cities. Then verses 36 to 39 show that priests were included among those returning. Verse 40 speaks of Levites, and verses 41-42 of singers.
Why keep such a record at all? One writer answers from the fact that the list exists.
This chapter gives us a register of the people of the province who came up out of the captivity, whom Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon had carried away to Babylon, and who returned to Jerusalem and Judah, each to his own town. There are several interesting details to notice in the record. The first is that the list's very existence shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people, however feebly they took in His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list on record. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows too that the very names of His people are known and announced, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
The record has a silence in it as well.
Apart from its last three verses, chapter two gives the numbers of those who answered the proclamation, listed under the heads of their families. It names the heads and counts the families. God took note of them and put their names into His record. But those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence. Let us take note of this.
A count this small marks a sad change in Israel's story. That is exactly where the comfort lies.
Still, is it not a precious truth that God takes pleasure in letting His people know that every one of them is prized by Him? A sad change had come through Israel's sin and through Judah's sin, and not least through the sin of David's house. Sin gives occasion to His grace, yet it cannot come without man's humiliation. Faith takes account of both. But God is always waiting to bless His own, and to give them the proof and the sense of His blessing. We see it even in the numbering of those who returned from Babylon.
These towns did not vanish from history. One of them turns up again in the New Testament under another name.
Some may be interested to know that the Lydda of the New Testament is none other than the Lod of 1 Chronicles 8:12; Ezra 2:33; Nehemiah 7:37 and Nehemiah 11:35. It is still called Ludd or Lidi today... Ono, Hadid, and Neballat were linked with Lod long ago, and each can still be clearly identified today under a changed name.
Ono comes up again later, when opponents press for a meeting away from Jerusalem.
It is as if they said: do not be so narrow and exclusive. Come down from your sacred enclosure to "one of the villages in the plain of Ono." "Let us meet together." Come down, and give us your approval in the plain of Ono. Do you ask what this plain of Ono was? Turn to Nehemiah 11:35: "Lod, and Ono, the valley of craftsmen." Leave the one centre of worship inside the walls of Jerusalem, and come down to any one of the villages of "the craftsmen." They knew well that if the true worship of God was set up in that holy place, they would feel, as the Ephesians did later, that their craft was in danger.
- Named. This part of the record counts people by their town, not only by their ancestor.
- Prized. God kept the record because He values the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work, even when His people hardly understand His purpose.
- Counted. A number this small is humbling, yet the record proves God delights to let each of His own know they are prized by Him.
- Omitted. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence; the record holds the names of those who answered God's call.
- Located. The record keeps real towns: Lod is the New Testament's Lydda, and Ono is the plain where opponents later wanted a meeting away from Jerusalem.
The children of Jericho, three hundred and forty-five.
Ezra 2:34 is one line in a long register of those who came home from exile in Babylon. It counts 345 people from Jericho. Why would God preserve a headcount from a single small town, and why is that town Jericho of all places?
The chapter is a roll-call. Why did God keep such a list?
The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. Its existence shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. It was precious however feebly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has preserved this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and announced. That is an encouragement to all: to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
The counting cuts both ways.
Chapter two, apart from the last three verses, gives the numbers of those who answered the proclamation. They are named under the heads of their families. The heads are named and the families counted. God took note of them and put their names into His record, while the list passes over in silence those whose hearts did not stir them up to go. Let us take note of this.
Verse 34 sits in a distinct block of the list. The register changes its basis part way through.
From verse 3 to verse 20 of chapter 2 they are listed according to the name of their fathers, and from verse 21 to verse 34 according to the name of their cities. Once they had returned to Palestine, those listed by their cities went to live in their home towns and fill them again. The register covered the whole people according to their genealogies, as Nehemiah 7:5 tells us.
So "the sons of Jericho" are not one man's descendants. They are a town's people, going back to fill their home town again.
Jericho is not a neutral name on this list. Its history runs from Moab's occupation to a healed spring.
Jericho was allotted to Benjamin (Joshua 18:21), but later Eglon the king of Moab took it over. It is called "the city of palm trees" (Deuteronomy 34:3; Judges 1:16; Judges 3:13; 2 Chronicles 28:15). Afterwards "sons of the prophets" lived there. They said the situation of the city was pleasant, but the water was bad. It was Elisha's first miracle: he threw in salt and the water was healed. It was the ministry of heavenly blessing in the place of the curse (2 Kings 2:18-22). Some who returned from exile are described as "children of Jericho" (Ezra 2:34; Nehemiah 7:36).
Three hundred and forty-five is a small figure, and so is the total the chapter reaches.
The whole assembly totalled 42,360, with servants and singers adding another 7,537 to the number. This was only a small percentage of Judah and Benjamin, but the Lord took account of every one. Their horses numbered 736 — nothing compared to Solomon's 40,000 stalls of horses (1 Kings 4:26). But at least Judah did have "a little strength" (compare Revelation 3:8).
Why such exactness about names and numbers?
So we see that the remnant are careful to stand clear and unmistakable as sons of the covenant. Descent in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God does to the Christian. Never before had such jealous care been necessary, and above all among the priests, as we shall see. But it was true of the people too: none but Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel. The captivity in Babylon had completed the confusion that sin had caused long before. But those who feared the Lord were all the more careful, in a way that was not needed in the days when everything was known and in order. Restoration is always difficult.
- Called. A proclamation went out, and this verse records one town's answer to it — 345 people who moved.
- Counted. God preserved the names because He values the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work. Those who did not stir themselves are left out.
- Placed. From verse 21 on, people are listed by city rather than by father, because they were going back to re-people the towns they came from.
- Cleansed. Jericho was a place of curse. A prophet healed its water, and now its people are named among those coming home.
- Kept. The total was a small fraction of Judah and Benjamin. Yet the Lord took account of every one, and every one had to prove he belonged.
The children of Senaah, three thousand six hundred and thirty.
One line ends a long count: a single family group of 3,630 people, the largest number in the whole list of those who came back from exile. Why does Scripture bother to count them, and what became of the family whose name closes the list?
Why does a list of names and numbers survive at all? One commentator finds the answer in the fact that it survives:
The very fact that this record exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — however weakly they had entered into His thoughts about His house. That is why He has kept this list. It shows that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows that He knows His people's names and makes them known, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
This way of counting has a quiet edge to it. A record that names some people also leaves others out:
Except for the last three verses, chapter two gives the numbers of those who answered the proclamation, listed under the heads of their families. It names the heads and counts the families. God took note of these people and put their names into His record. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go He passes over in silence. Let us take note of this.
Another writer sets this page beside a second record God keeps:
This chapter contains the names of the returning remnant. It is a sample page from the records God keeps. From it we learn that He remembers His people. He knows them by name, and He does not forget their works. In the book of Nehemiah this list is repeated (chapter 7), with an extra record of those who helped build the wall. He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16); and the apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this fact when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for His name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).
Verse 35 is a boundary marker. It closes the count of ordinary people before the chapter turns to those with temple duties:
Verses 3 to 35 count the people of various cities. Then verses 36 to 39 include the priests among those returning. Verse 40 speaks of the Levites, and verses 41-42 of the singers.
One reference work links this family to builders met again when Jerusalem's wall was rebuilt:
One whose sons built the fish gate at Jerusalem (Neh. 3:3). Probably the same as Senaah in Neh. 7:38 and Ezra 2:35, with the article added in Neh. 3:3.
If that link holds, this family later took on one of the most exposed parts of the wall — and finished the job:
After them, the sons of Senaah stand out (Neh. 3:3). Senaah may be a city, or it may be a district in the region of Jericho. They built the fish gate... This gate stood in the northern part of Jerusalem. Like "the gate of the old wall", it was especially open to enemy attack. The Assyrian armies came from the north to surround the city and besiege it. The sons of Senaah saw how important this gate was. They did not stop working until its locks and bars were in place.
Counting families by descent was not bookkeeping for its own sake. It settled who had a right to build:
So we see that the remnant are watchful to stand plain and clear as sons of the covenant. Descent by birth in the line of promise mattered as much to them as being born of God matters to the Christian. Such jealous care had never been so necessary... only Israelites can be allowed to build a temple to the God of Israel.
One writer draws the principle out for a day of weakness:
But what I want you to notice is the principle. It was a day of weakness and humiliation, yet it was not to be a day of carelessness. It was to be a day of the greatest care. God's people were to be as watchful for His name then as when everything stood in the full power and beauty of divine order.
- Counted. The list exists because God kept it. He looks with joy on even the smallest fruit of His work in His people's hearts.
- Named. Every household is listed under its family head, because only true Israelites could build God's temple. A day of weakness was still a day for the greatest care.
- Omitted. Those whose hearts did not stir them up to go are passed over in silence.
- Remembered. This page is a sample of the records God keeps. He knows His people by name and does not forget the love they have shown in serving.
- Used. The family that closes the roll probably built the Fish Gate later, the part of the wall most open to attack. They kept working until its locks and bars were in place.
The priests the children of Jedaiah, of the house of Jeshua, nine hundred and seventy-three.
Up to this point the list of returning exiles has counted families and towns. At this verse it turns to those who would serve God's house, and the priests come first. Two questions follow. Why does God count and name them? And what does so short a list say about the state of the priesthood?
This verse opens a very short list of priests. Only a fraction of the old priestly order came home:
The record lists the different temple officials next, and it mentions the priests first. 1 Chronicles 24 lists twenty-four courses. Jedaiah, Immer and Harim appear in the record of Chronicles. In all there were 4,289 priests who went back. And these made up four courses only.
The words "of the house of Jeshua" tie these priests to one of the two men who led the return:
The first return happened around the year 536 BC. Zerubbabel was a descendant of King David. Jeshua was a descendant of Aaron the high priest. These two men led the first Jews home. First they built the altar for burnt offerings in the outer court of the temple, and then the temple itself.
A roll of names and figures can look like filler. One writer reads the existence of the list as evidence of how God felt about the people who answered His call:
The record holds several interesting details. The first is that the list exists at all. Its existence shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — however feebly they understood His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed. This encourages all to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption.
Verse 36 begins a block of four priestly families totalling over four thousand. The Levites that follow number seventy-four. That imbalance is a reversal of the earlier history of Israel:
Notice in passing how many the priests were, and how few the Levites. Before the captivity it was the Levites who stood out in comparison. The priests had gained from the recent trial and from God's intervention.
Even so, priests in this list are a hopeful sign. The shortage of Levites is the part that keeps repeating:
It is good to see that there were priests among them (v. 36), and also Levites (v. 40). It is good to see priestly activity coming back among the people, and Levitical service too. But Levites always seem to be in short supply. Here we find just 74 Levites for about 4,000 priests, and we will find an even greater shortage in chapter 8. Very few are willing to do practical work for the benefit of the people of God. But praise the Lord there are some!
Another writer carries the ratio over to the church. The priest stands for the worshipper, the Levite for the one who does the practical work:
Don't these facts have something to say to us today? All Christians are priests, and their proper function is to worship God. That is why many of them feel the need to fill their role as worshippers in the assembly of the living God — though it goes without saying that even this number is too few. But the absence of Levites hurts badly. Their functions correspond to the ministries in the Christian assembly. It was not that there was any lack of people, as we shall see in Ezra 8. On their part there was indifference, spiritual laziness, and love of their own comfort, no doubt. So only seventy-four people present themselves to escort the priests, the people, and their leaders!
- Counted — God kept this list because He values the response His grace produced, however small. He records the very names of His people.
- Named — Jedaiah heads one of the twenty-four priestly courses of 1 Chronicles 24. Only four of those courses came back, 4,289 priests in all.
- Led — The house of Jeshua ties these priests to Jeshua, a descendant of Aaron. He led the return with Zerubbabel, who came from David's line.
- Willing — The priests had gained from the recent trial. They now outnumber the Levites, which reverses Israel's earlier history.
- Lopsided — Worshippers come forward more readily than workers. Indifference and love of comfort thinned the Levites, and the pattern still holds.
The children of Immer, a thousand and fifty-two.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
The children of Pashhur, a thousand two hundred and forty-seven.
One line in a long list: the family of Pashhur, 1,247 strong, among the priests who came back from exile in Babylon to Jerusalem. Why does Scripture keep a bare headcount of one priestly family? And what does that number say about God's people at the time?
The first lesson is that the list exists at all. One commentator sees in it God's delight in a response He Himself produced:
The fact that this record exists shows how precious to God the response of His people was. His grace had produced that response in their hearts, however feebly they grasped His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the very names of His people and makes them known. He does this to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
Another writer links the list to a promise that God does not forget what His people do:
It is a sample page of the records God keeps. From it we may learn that He remembers His people. He knows them by name, and He does not forget their works... He has a book of remembrance (Mal. 3:16). The apostle reminded the Hebrew believers of this when he wrote: "For God is not unjust so as to overlook your work and the love that you have shown for his name in serving the saints, as you still do" (Heb. 6:10).
Pashhur sits in a short block of its own. One writer traces the order of the register:
From verse 3 to verse 35 the register counts the people of various cities. Then verses 36 to 39 mention priests among those returning. Verse 40 speaks of Levites, and verses 41-42 of singers.
That block holds only four families. The priesthood once had twenty-four divisions of service, and only a few of them came home:
In 1 Chronicles 24 twenty-four courses are mentioned. Jedaiah, Immer and Harim are found in the record of Chronicles. In all there were 4,289 priests who went back. And these made up only four courses.
Set beside the seventy-four Levites later in the chapter, Pashhur's 1,247 looks large. One writer sees in that contrast a reversal of what the nation had been before the exile:
Notice in passing how many priests there were, and how few Levites by comparison. Before the captivity the Levites had been the ones who stood out. The priests had profited by the recent trial and by God's intervention.
Another writer brings the same gap into the present day:
Here we find just 74 Levites for about 4,000 priests, and chapter 8 shows an even greater shortage. Those willing to take on practical work for the good of God's people are notoriously few. But praise the Lord there are some!
A name in the register mattered. A few verses later, some priests looked for their own entry and could not find it. The ruling against them had a limit:
If any could not show their genealogy, they had no claim to take part in the work of their calling. For the priests the result was even more serious. If they could not find their register, they were treated as polluted and put out of the priesthood. No one told them they were not priests. The ground taken was that their claim was not proven. It might be proven at a future time. When a priest once more stood up with Urim and Thummim — the light and perfection of God, giving him divine intelligence and discernment — he might judge them to be true priests. Meanwhile their claim was forfeited. Grace could restore what was lost under law, but for that they had to wait patiently.
One writer draws from this a caution for days of weakness, and notes how long the gap has lasted:
A day of weakness demands care not to go beyond our measure... Israel as a natural nation has never had a priest with Urim and Thummim since, least of all when they refused the Lord Jesus. It will not be so always.
- Counted. God takes account of everyone who answered His call. The number 1,247 stands in Scripture as one page from the records He keeps.
- Named. Pashhur's name is in the register. In this chapter, a name you can trace is the difference between serving and being set aside.
- Partial. Four priestly families out of twenty-four returned, 4,289 men in all: a real recovery, but a fraction of what once was.
- Lopsided. About 4,000 priests to 74 Levites: those willing to do the practical work were the fewest of all.
- Awaited. Unsettled cases had to wait for a priest with Urim and Thummim. Grace could restore what law had lost, but only in God's time.
The children of Harim, a thousand and seventeen.
This verse ends a short list of four priestly families who went back from Babylon to Jerusalem. One line of numbers raises a real question. Why does God keep a roll of names at all? And what does this list tell us about His people after the exile?
The chapter moves in blocks, and this verse belongs to the priestly one. One writer maps the divisions:
From verse 3 to verse 35 the record lists the people of various cities. Then from verse 36 to 39 it mentions priests as part of the number of those returning. Verse 40 speaks of the Levites, and verses 41-42 of the singers.
Harim himself appears only as the head of a family line:
Ancestor of priests who returned from exile. Ezra 2:39; Ezra 10:21. Neh. 7:42.
A list of families and figures can look like dead weight in Scripture. One commentator argues the opposite — that its very existence is the point:
The fact that this list exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have grasped very little of His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It is also evidence that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed. That encourages all to walk in His ways, to make His interests their own, and to stay faithful in times of corruption.
Harim's name is worth tracing back. An earlier record lists twenty-four priestly groups, called courses. Only a few of them appear here:
The priests come first. In 1 Chronicles 24 we find twenty-four courses. Jedaiah, Immer and Harim appear in the record of Chronicles. In all 4,289 priests went back. And they made up only four courses.
The priests came back in force. The men who did the practical work of God's house did not:
The priests came from four families of the sons of Aaron. They proved eager to take up again their place and work in the house of God that was about to be built. They numbered 4,289 (Ezra 2:36-39). But of the three families of the Levites, only one family was there at all, and even that family came in numbers far too few.
Another writer draws the shortfall out as a pattern rather than a one-off:
It is good to see that there were priests among them (v.36), and also Levites (v.40). It is good to see priestly activity recovered among the people, as well as Levitical service. But Levites always seem to be in short supply. Here we find just 74 Levites for about 4,000 priests, and we will find an even greater shortage in chapter 8. Those willing to do practical work for the good of the people of God are known to be few. But praise the Lord there are some!
The sons of Harim are on the roll; a few verses later, other priestly families are not. Their descent could not be traced, and the register decided the matter:
If any could not show their genealogy, they had no claim to take part in the work they had been called to. For the priests the result was even more serious. If they could not find their register, they were treated as unclean and put out of the priesthood. No one told them they were not priests. The ground taken was that their claim was not proven. It might be proven at a future time. So the governor told them not to eat of the most holy things until a priest stood up with Urim and Thummim. When that time came, that priest — once more given divine intelligence and discernment through Urim and Thummim, the light and perfection of God — might judge them to be true priests. Until then their claim was forfeited. Grace could restore what was lost under law, but for this they had to wait patiently.
Commentators differ on how hard to press these numbers. On the honesty of the decision itself they agree:
Under the circumstances, the best course of action is to take account of our weakness and not to pretend to have what we do not have (v.63). It must have been hard to refuse those priests, but doing so simply showed that they put God first, not human feelings.
- Named. God kept this list because He treasures the response His grace produced. He sees the smallest fruits of His work, and "the very names of His people are known and proclaimed."
- Numbered. Harim's 1,017 form part of 4,289 priests — but only four of the original twenty-four courses came back.
- Proved. Being counted meant showing a register. Families who could not show one had to wait outside priestly service until God settled the matter.
- Unbalanced. About 4,000 priests came back, but only 74 Levites. Worship recovered faster than practical work, and that shortage keeps returning.
- Honest. Refusing to claim what was lost was not weakness but putting God before human feeling.
The Levites the children of Jeshua and of Kadmiel, of the children of Hodaviah, seventy-four.
Seventy-four Levites came home from Babylon. Why did so few of the tribe given to the service of God's house return, and what did God do with the handful who did?
The number means little until you set it beside what that tribe once was:
The Levites through grace readily entered on their work. There were only seventy-four. In the wilderness they numbered eight thousand five hundred and eighty, counting only those from thirty to fifty years old. So when the Lord opened the door out of their captivity in Babylon, very few cared to use it. They had found a home, sadly, in the land of their exile. They had forgotten Jerusalem and stopped remembering Zion. The faithfulness of these seventy-four was all the more precious to the Lord. With His presence and blessing they were enough for His service as overseers of the workmen in the house of God.
The same writer notes that these seventy-four were not the whole body of Levites:
The children of Asaph, and the children of the gatekeepers (Ezra 2:41-42), were also Levites. Altogether, then, they numbered three hundred and forty-one. But only these seventy-four were available for this special work.
Coming back cost a Levite more than it cost anyone else, because his tribe held no land of its own:
Only seventy-four Levites returned. This was a very small number. (Hodaviah should be read Judah; chapter 3:9.) There were more singers than Levites. The children of Asaph, that sweet and blessed singer in Israel, were one hundred and twenty-eight... But why were so few Levites ready to go back? According to the divine instruction in the Law they were to have no inheritance except in the LORD. Returning in these circumstances was a test of faith. That is why many Levites must have stayed in Babylon, where things were plentiful.
Read against the four priestly houses just listed, verse 40 reverses an older pattern:
Notice in passing how many were the priests, and how few the Levites, in comparison. Before the captivity the Levites had shone by comparison. The priests had profited by the recent trial and God's intervention.
Another writer adds the figures behind the contrast:
The priests came from four families of the sons of Aaron. They proved eager to take up their place and duties again in the house of God that was about to be built. They numbered 4289 (Ezra 2:36-39). Of the three families of the Levites, only one family appeared, and even that family sent a number that was nowhere near enough.
One writer applies both roles — priest and Levite — to believers now:
Only the priests could minister at the altar or in the holy places. Still, the Levites had a blessed place of service. They were originally given to Aaron (Christ) for the service of the tabernacle (Num. 3), for all the work of the house of God outside of the priestly office. At the present time believers are both priests and Levites. When they are in the holiest, offering to God the sacrifice of praise through Christ, or when they "do good" and share what they have, they are acting as priests (Heb. 13:15-16). When they are busy for the Lord in other kinds of service, they show the Levitical character.
Rossier sees the same shortage in the present day:
There was no lack of people, as we shall see in Ezra 8. On their part there was indifference, spiritual laziness, and love of their own comfort, no doubt. So only seventy-four people present themselves to escort the priests, the people, and their chiefs! This is certainly one of the marks of the present time just as it was in those days. Some have received gifts from the Lord for evangelising, teaching, and feeding the flock of Christ. They are afraid to go forward with the strength He gives them... Instead of feeling their responsibility, they hand it to others.
Small as the company was, God kept their names:
He has caused this list to be preserved. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows that the very names of His people are known and announced, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to keep faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
- Comfort kept them. The Levites held no inheritance but the LORD, so returning was a test of faith — and Babylon was plentiful.
- Few came. Seventy-four returned. The wilderness count had been 8,580, and of three Levite families only one showed up.
- Reversal. Before the captivity the Levites had shone beside the priests. Now over four thousand priests came back, and the Levites were a handful.
- Enough. With His presence and blessing those seventy-four were enough to oversee the work. Their faithfulness was all the more precious to Him.
- Recorded. God preserved their names. He sees with joy the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work, and their record calls others to the same faithfulness.
The singers the children of Asaph, a hundred and twenty-eight.
The list of returning exiles pauses here to count one family of singers. The 128 sons of Asaph stand between the Levites and the gatekeepers. Why does God bother to record a choir by name, and why are there more singers than Levites?
One commentator sees the survival of this list as evidence of God's pleasure in a small response.
The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. It shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only weakly into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and announced. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
The verse lists the singers on their own, but they belonged to the Levites. Adding them back changes the small figure of 74 in the verse before.
The children of Asaph, and the children of the gatekeepers (Ezra 2:41-42), were also Levites. Altogether, then, they numbered 341. But only these 74 were available for this special work.
The exiles had come from a place where they could not sing. That background gives the count of singers its weight.
Only seventy-four Levites returned. This was a very small number. There were more singers than Levites. The children of Asaph, that sweet and blessed singer in Israel, were 128. No doubt they encouraged the returning exiles in song, by the spirit of praise and worship. The Babylon experience, so beautifully expressed in Psalm 137, was past. "By the waters of Babylon, there we sat down and wept, when we remembered Zion. On the willows there we hung up our lyres... How shall we sing the LORD's song in a foreign land?" All was changed now. God was working. Deliverance had come, and singing was no doubt heard again among the returning crowds.
Another passage says what the singers actually did. David put them over the song in the Lord's house, and their praise points forward.
We can learn what they did from another passage. "These are the men whom David put in charge of the service of song in the house of the LORD after the ark rested there... they performed their service according to their order" (1 Chronicles 6:31-32). The psalmist refers to these when he says, "Blessed are those who dwell in your house, ever singing your praise!" (Psalm 84:4). This was the work of the singers: praising the Lord "day and night" (1 Chronicles 9:33). It is a shadow of the endless work of the redeemed in heaven (Revelation 5). It is a blessed service — if service is the right word — and the Church has the privilege of starting it here on earth while it waits for the return of our blessed Lord.
The next verse names the gatekeepers. One writer sets the two roles side by side:
There were also singers (v. 41), to give praise to God. And there were gatekeepers (v. 42), who would be responsible to keep out everything that would interfere with the Lord's glory.
Commentators differ in tone here. One celebrates the recovered song. Another turns the gap between 128 singers and 74 Levites into a question.
The singers, the sons of Asaph, were more numerous than the sons of Levi: the Word mentions 128 of them (Ezra 2:41). What a precious work it is to sing the praises of God! But do we not often see many in the gatherings of the saints taking the role of the "children of Asaph"? They take it to avoid a service that is more demanding and that calls for greater responsibility.
The shortage that shows up beside the singers is treated as a recurring pattern rather than a one-off:
It is good to see that there were priests among them (v. 36), and also Levites (v. 40)... But Levites always seem to be in short supply. Here we find just 74 Levites for about 4,000 priests. Those who are willing to be engaged in practical work for the benefit of the people of God are notoriously few. But praise the Lord there are some!
- Recorded. God kept this list. He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and He knows His people by name.
- Recovered. Singers and gatekeepers were Levites too. Counting them all gives 341, though only 74 were free for that special work.
- Released. The lyres hung up in Babylon are in use again. Deliverance had come, God was working, and song came back with the people.
- Rehearsed. The singers praised God day and night. That is a shadow of what the redeemed will do in heaven, and the Church can begin it now.
- Rebalanced. Few Levites came back, because returning cost them any inheritance but the LORD. And the pleasant role must never be a way of dodging the demanding one.
The children of the doorkeepers the children of Shallum, the children of Ater, the children of Talmon, the children of Akkub, the children of Hatita, the children of Shobai, in all a hundred and thirty-nine.
This verse is one line in a long register of families who came back from captivity. It names six households of gatekeepers, 139 men in all, and raises a question: why did guarding a door matter enough for God to record it?
Why do these names survive at all? One writer finds the answer in the fact that the list exists.
He has caused this list to be preserved. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. He knows the very names of His people and makes them known, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to take His interests as their own, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away from God.
The gatekeepers were not a separate tribe of their own. Verses 40 to 42 count them together with the singers and the other Levites.
The children of Asaph, and the children of the gatekeepers (Ezra 2:41-42), were also Levites. Altogether, therefore, they numbered 341.
Older English Bibles call these men "porters," meaning keepers of a door. So what did the charge involve?
The gatekeepers had charge of the gates. Their responsibility was to admit only those who had the proper qualifications to enter the city and approach the house, and to refuse all others.
A gate can fail in two ways. It can let in what should stay out, and it can shut out someone with every right to come in.
The doorkeepers had charge of all the gates of the temple. They had to be able to repel any attempt against the house of God. They had to watch with constant energy, so that no defiled person could enter the courts of the Lord. But they also had to keep the doors open, so that they never shut out a priest who had the right to enter the temple.
Why did the returning company need 139 men at the doors? The answer lies in what they were guarding. The list sets singers and gatekeepers side by side.
There were also singers (v. 41), to give praise to God, and gatekeepers (v. 42) who would be responsible to keep out everything that would interfere with the Lord's glory.
The link between the two is closer than it first appears. Careless work at the gate does not simply admit the wrong people; it empties the house of song.
The singers gave the Lord His portion. Only the redeemed can sing the songs of Zion. So the gatekeepers had to carry out their responsibilities faithfully, if the Lord was to have His portion. To let in those without divine qualifications is to admit those who cannot sing. Worship is lost where the gatekeepers are lax. When an assembly of God's people today loses its worship, that usually goes together with letting people in carelessly.
Commentators read this office as a picture of a responsibility Christians still carry.
They held a most important post, and so do the gatekeepers of today. Every believer — every member of the body of Christ — has his place, for example, at the Lord's supper. That is true, and we must always insist on it. Even so, the "gatekeepers" of the assembly have the responsibility of asking for proof that people are what they claim to be. Slackness or neglect here has produced the most serious consequences in many an assembly. In some cases it has destroyed all testimony for Christ and brought open dishonour on His blessed name. So it matters greatly that only faithful and trusted men should do the work of "gatekeepers," especially in a day of common profession, when everyone alike claims to be a Christian.
So who appoints such men today? Another writer answers that no one does.
In the Church of God today we surely need such gatekeepers, but the Church has no authority to appoint them. Instead, since the Spirit of God dwells in the Church, He will move godly men to do this necessary work willingly, with no need of appointment. They have the Word of God to guide them in it, for the Spirit of God always works by means of that Word.
- Named. God kept six gatekeeper families on record by name. He sees with joy the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work.
- Guard. Their office was to admit those qualified to come near the house, and to refuse all others.
- Open. The same watchfulness had to keep the doors open. No priest with a right to enter could be turned away.
- Worship. Guarding the gate protects the singing. Hold it loosely, and praise is the first thing to go.
- Today. The Church cannot appoint gatekeepers, yet the Spirit of God still moves godly men to the work, with the Word to guide them.
The Nethinim the children of Ziha, the children of Hasupha, the children of Tabbaoth,
After the priests, Levites and singers, the list of returning exiles turns to the temple servants, or Nethinim, named family by family down to verse 54. Who were they, and why does God record the names of those doing the humblest work in His house?
Their name is itself a description.
The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chron. 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order originated with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites. Joshua appointed them as helpers to the Levites (Josh. 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God, with set duties in the temple.
They stood one step below the Levites: "Their function was entirely to serve the Levites; they worked for the Levites." (George Davison)
Their place in the list has led writers to conclude they were not Israelites by birth.
The word seems to mean "those that are given." Because of where their names come in the chapter (see also 1 Chr. 9:2), writers have concluded that they came from another race. They had been given at first to the Levites, to serve them. In the same way the Levites had been given to Aaron for the Lord's service in His tabernacle — only the Levites were given by God's command, and in the place of the firstborn of Israel (see Num. 8).
Commentators treat the Gibeonite link as likely, not proven. They also differ over who set them apart: "It does not appear that God appointed them, as He did the Levites, but 'David and the princes' appointed them 'for the service of the Levites.'" (Morrish Bible Dictionary)
If the Gibeonites were their ancestors, these families carried the memory of a sentence of slavery.
So here we probably find the origin of the Nethinim. God spared them from the judgment they deserved. If He put them into slavery, it was slavery in His mercy, and it tied them to His house. The very curse that rested on them (see Joshua 9:23) was turned into a blessing. What do we find? The sword of the Lord's army did not destroy them. They were rescued. Centuries later they stand in honourable company with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment. So they are no small picture of the objects of grace, even in the present age.
These families were not Israelites, and they had been away from Judah for a lifetime.
We never read of any of them refusing this place of submission to Israel. Their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable loyalty to the God of Israel. They were Gentiles, and they had been away from Judah for 70 years. After such a long absence, not all the Jews were ready to return to their own country. So the faith of these Gentiles who had joined them shines out all the brighter.
Later, when Ezra gathered a second company, these servants far outnumbered the Levites: "There are 220 Nethinim, or about six servants for each Levite!" (H. L. Rossier)
The tasks behind these names were small ones.
These modest tasks are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly records all the names of their fathers. It is the same today, whether it is serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, or taking care of the "upper room". The Lord forgets none of it. He writes down the names of those who have kept charge of this service, and they deserve it just as much as any others.
God's notice of the overlooked did not end with Ezra's list.
And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim (v.43) and Solomon's servants (v.55). These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they were occupied with lowly service. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. In the same way, members of the body of Christ have different tasks, duties, and abilities. The most prominent ones may not be the most important ones (1 Cor. 12).
- Given. The name means "given" or "devoted" — men handed to God for service in His house, as the Levites were given to Aaron.
- Spared. Writers link them, with care, to the Gibeonites. They escaped judgment and received servitude instead of the sword.
- Turned. God turned the curse on them into a blessing. Centuries later they stand in honourable company with His people — a picture of grace.
- Devoted. Outsiders by birth, they returned when many Israelites would not. Later they outnumbered the Levites six to one in answering Ezra's call.
- Remembered. God writes their modest work down family by family. The least visible service in His house is never the least valued.
the children of Keros, the children of Siaha, the children of Padon,
Keros, Siaha and Padon appear here among the Nethinim, the temple servants who returned from exile in Babylon. Their names mean nothing to us today, so why does God record them, and who were these men?
This group carries its own title in the list. The title tells us what they were for.
The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, given to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chron. 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order originated with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites, whom Joshua appointed as helpers to the Levites (Josh. 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God assigned to certain duties in the temple.
Were these men Israelites at all? Their names sit after the Israelites in the chapter, and that placing shapes the answer.
Two other classes follow the Israelites in this list: the Nethinim, and the servants of Solomon. Were these of Jewish descent? The word seems to mean "those that are given." Because of where their names come in the chapter, the conclusion has been that they were of another race, but had first been given to the Levites for their service. The Levites too had been given to Aaron for the Lord's service in His tabernacle — only they were given by God's command, and in the place of the firstborn of Israel.
after_note: none
If these families came from Gibeon, their low place as servants became the very thing that spared them.
Here, then, we probably find where the Nethinim came from — people spared from the just judgment of God. If they were reduced to slavery, it was slavery in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse resting on them turned into a blessing. For what do we find? Instead of dying by the sword of the Lord's army, they were rescued. Centuries later they stand in honoured company with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of those who receive grace even in this age.
The journey home was long and costly. Notice, then, who chose to make it.
We do not read of any of them refusing this place of submission to Israel, and their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable loyalty to the God of Israel, since they were Gentiles and had been away from Judah for 70 years. After so long an absence, not all of the Jews were prepared to return to their own country, so that the faith of their Gentile adherents shines out the more brightly.
A verse of three forgotten names looks like filler. Its survival says something about what God values.
This record exists at all, and that shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — however weakly they may have grasped His thoughts about His house. For that reason He has kept this list, as evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. He knows the very names of His people and announces them, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
The ones easiest to overlook are named too.
And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim (v.43) and Solomon's servants (v.55). These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they were occupied with lowly service. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. Similarly, in the body of Christ, members have different tasks, duties, and abilities, and the most prominent ones may not be the most important ones (1 Cor. 12).
- Given. Nethinim means "given" or "devoted" — men set apart for duties at God's house. Scripture names them in only one other place.
- Given from outside. Their place in the list, after the Israelites, led commentators to conclude they came from another race and were given to the Levites for service. The link to Gibeon is probable, not proven.
- Given instead of judged. If they came from Gibeon, their sentence of servitude spared them from destruction. The curse on them turned into blessing.
- Giving themselves back. Centuries later they chose the journey home while many Jews stayed behind. The faith of these outsiders shines the brighter.
- Given a name in the record. God kept their family names. He notices the smallest fruit of His work, and the least prominent servants are not the least important.
the children of Lebanah, the children of Hagabah, the children of Akkub,
Lebanah, Hagabah and Akkub belong to a long list of Nethinim — the temple servants who came home from exile with the first group of returning Jews. Why does Scripture keep the family names of men who only carried wood and water for God's house?
One commentator traces the name of this group and its likely origin:
The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, given to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chronicles 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order started with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites. Joshua appointed them as helpers to the Levites (Joshua 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God assigned to certain duties in the temple.
Commentators differ on how certain that link is. Some call it probable rather than proven. All agree on the work itself: these men served as helpers under the Levites.
If the Gibeonites are in view, these men descend from a people Joshua sentenced to lasting servitude. One commentator reads their place in the list as mercy:
It is here, then, that we probably find the origin of the Nethinim — those who were spared from the just judgment of God. If they were reduced to slavery, it was slavery in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse resting on them (see Joshua 9:23) turned into a blessing. For what do we find? They were not destroyed by the sword of the Lord's host. They were rescued. And now, centuries later, we find them in honourable company with the Lord's people. They had a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow-captives at this special moment. They are surely no small foreshadowing of those who receive grace even in this present age.
The same writer widens the lesson:
The lesson already drawn is again significant, that the least connection with the Lord's people and the Lord's things becomes a means of blessing — not always spiritual blessing, though almost always blessing in this life.
Nothing here looks impressive: three family names, no deeds, no speeches. One commentator counts these servants, then carries the point into our own day:
The gatekeepers numbered 139. The Nethinim, the lower servants of the sanctuary, together with Solomon's servants, numbered 392 (v. 58). These modest functions are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly registers all the names of their fathers. In the same way today, the Lord forgets none of it: serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, taking care of the upper room. He registers the names of those who have kept this service just as deservedly as the others. And we shall see, more than once, that the child of God who took the last place, forgetting himself to serve others, will hold a place of honour. Meanwhile a striking gift that tended to glorify man instead of Christ will sit down in shame in the last place.
These servants were not Israelites by birth, and seventy years had passed since the exile began. Yet their names stand in the list:
We do not read of any of them refusing this place of submission to Israel. Their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable loyalty to the God of Israel. They were Gentiles, and they had been away from Judah for 70 years. After so long an absence, not all of the Jews wanted to return to their own country. So the faith of these Gentiles who had joined them shines out the more brightly.
- Given. "Nethinim" means given, or devoted. These men were handed over to God's service as helpers under the Levites.
- Given mercy. They likely came from a people under a sentence of servitude. The bondage turned into mercy, because it tied them to God's house.
- Given a name. God writes down the families of His lowest servants. No small task in His house goes unnoticed by Him.
- Given a heart. They left Babylon when many Israelites by birth would not. The faith of these outsiders shines out the brighter.
- Given as a picture. Rescued outsiders now stand in honourable company with God's people — a foreshadowing of how grace still works.
the children of Hagab, the children of Shamlai, the children of Hanan,
This verse sits inside a long list of families who came home from exile in Babylon. These three names are not priests or princes but Nethinim, the lowest workers at God's house — so why does God bother to write them down?
The name itself is the first clue. Commentators trace it to a group from outside Israel.
The word seems to mean "those that are given." From the place where their names occur in the chapter, some have concluded that they were of another race, but had been given originally to the Levites for their service. The Levites themselves had been given to Aaron for the Lord's service in His tabernacle — only these by divine command, and in the place of the firstborn of Israel. Traces of such are found in two Scriptures... We also find Joshua saying to the Gibeonites, "some of you shall always be slaves, cutters of wood and drawers of water for the house of my God."
The Gibeonites were a local people Joshua spared. Their work for God's house was lifelong. That origin is only probable, and another writer points to a later appointment:
Ezra 8:20 tells us that David appointed the Nethinim to serve the Levites. They were probably Gibeonites whom Joshua had received.
If these families do descend from Gibeon, their history took a surprising turn.
Here, then, we probably find the origin of the Nethinim: God spared them from His just judgment. If they were reduced to slavery, it was slavery in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse resting on them turned into a blessing. For what do we find? The sword of the Lord's host did not destroy them; they were rescued. Now, centuries later, we find them in honourable company with the Lord's people. They had a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in the present age.
The list does not stop at a headcount. It goes family by family.
The Nethinim, or subordinate servants of the sanctuary, together with Solomon's servants, numbered 392. These modest functions are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly registers all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. Whether it is serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, or taking care of the "upper room," the Lord forgets none of it. He registers the names of those who have kept the charge of this service just as deservedly as others. And we will see, in more than one case, that the child of God who took the last place, forgetting himself in order to serve others, will be given a place of honour — while a remarkable gift that tended to glorify man rather than Christ will sit down in shame in the last place.
Another writer carries the same thought into the church today.
And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim and Solomon's servants. These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they were occupied with lowly service. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. In the same way, members of the body of Christ have different tasks, duties, and abilities. The most prominent ones may not be the most important ones (1 Cor. 12).
The story does not end with the register. Later these families stand with Israel under a binding oath of their own. Writers name their stock differently — Gibeonites, or Amorites — but agree they were outsiders by birth.
When the people gathered in solemn assembly, their leaders sealed the covenant. The Nethinim entered into a curse and an oath to walk in God's law, and not to intermarry with the peoples of the land. They were in fact descendants of the Amorites, yet they were now thoroughly part of the nation of Israel. With the faithful in Israel, these men of faith were blessed.
- Given. Nethinim means "those that are given" — outsiders handed to the Levites for service, as the Levites had been given to Aaron.
- Spared. They escaped judgment. Their sentence to lowly labour placed them near God's house, so the curse turned into blessing.
- Willing. Centuries later they left Babylon with their fellow captives, and they had a heart for God's house.
- Named. God gladly writes down every family of these lowest servants. The one who takes the last place will be given a place of honour.
- Counted in. In the end they take the same oath as Israel's leaders: outsiders by birth, now fully part of Israel, blessed with the faithful.
the children of Giddel, the children of Gahar, the children of Reaiah,
These three family names belong to the Nethinim. They were temple servants, and they are listed among the thousands who returned from Babylon to rebuild God's house. Two questions follow. Who were these people, and why does Scripture keep a record like this?
The list exists because God valued the response His grace had produced, even in people whose grasp of His purposes was small.
On this account He has caused this list to be preserved, in evidence that He beholds with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that the very names of His people are known and proclaimed as an encouragement to all to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to maintain fidelity in times of corruption and apostasy.
These three families stand under one label: Nethinim. The word itself tells you their place.
The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chronicles 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order originated with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites, whom Joshua appointed as helpers to the Levites (Joshua 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God assigned to certain duties in the temple.
If these families were Gibeonites, their servitude began as a sentence. Yet the outcome is striking.
It is here, therefore, that we probably find the origin of the Nethinim — those who were spared from the just judgment of God; and if reduced to servile bondage, it was bondage in His mercy in connection with His house, so that the very curse that rested on them (see Joshua 9:23) was turned into a blessing. For what do we find? That instead of being destroyed with the sword of the Lord's host, they were rescued, and now, after the passing of centuries, they are found in honourable association with the Lord's people, and with a heart too for the Lord's house, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow-captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in this age.
Their willingness to travel is more remarkable than it first appears, because they had no ancestral claim to the land they were going to.
We have noted that the Nethinim were likely Gibeonites who had entered the congregation in the time of Joshua, who told them, "There shall none of you be freed from being bondmen, and hewers of wood and drawers of water for the house of my God" (Joshua 9:23). We do not read of any of them refusing this place of submission to Israel, and their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable loyalty to the God of Israel, since they were Gentiles and had been away from Judah for 70 years. After such a long absence, not all of the Jews were prepared to return to their own country, so the faith of their Gentile adherents shines out all the more brightly.
Most readers skim past names like these. God does not, and the same point reaches into the church today.
And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim (v. 43) and Solomon's servants (v. 55). These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they were occupied with lowly service. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. In the same way, members of the body of Christ have different tasks, duties, and abilities. The most prominent ones may not be the most important ones (1 Corinthians 12).
Their standing among the people was no longer marginal. Later, when the nation bound itself by covenant, these servants signed on with everyone else.
When gathered in solemn assembly, the covenant was sealed by the leaders of the people, and the Nethinim entered into a curse and an oath to walk in God's law and not to intermarry with the peoples of the land! For though they were actually descendants of the Amorites, they were now thoroughly incorporated with the nation of Israel. With the faithful in Israel, these men of faith were blessed.
- Given. "Nethinim" means those who are given or devoted — a title of service to God, not a family line.
- Spared. If they came from the Gibeonites, God spared them instead of destroying them. Their slavery was mercy, and the curse became a blessing.
- Named. God kept this record. He looks with joy on the smallest fruit of His Spirit's work, and He makes His people's names known.
- Willing. These Gentiles had been away from Judah for 70 years, yet they returned. Not all the Jews were ready to go. Their faith shines the brighter.
- Counted. God names lowly servants, and they later sealed the covenant with the nation. In the body of Christ too, the most prominent members may not be the most important.
the children of Rezin, the children of Nekoda, the children of Gazzam,
The verse sits deep inside a long list of families who came back from exile in Babylon. It falls in the section naming the Nethinim — the temple servants. The verse adds three more family names. Why would God keep a written record of servants nobody else would remember?
The chapter falls into groups, and this verse belongs to the last and lowest of them. One commentator traces the order:
Verses 3 to 35 list the people of various cities. Verses 36 to 39 mention priests among those returning. Verse 40 then speaks of Levites, and verses 41-42 of singers. Verse 43 introduces the Nethinim.
The name itself explains their place:
The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chron. 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order originated with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites, whom Joshua appointed as helpers to the Levites (Josh. 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God assigned to certain duties in the temple.
Commentators differ: some call the Gibeonite link probable, while Gaebelein leaves the origin open.
If these families did descend from the Gibeonites, then their servant status began as a judgment. The Gibeonites were the people Joshua spared instead of destroying, and he appointed them as helpers to the Levites. One writer draws out the result:
It is here, then, that we probably find the origin of the Nethinim — those who were spared from the just judgment of God. If they were reduced to the bondage of servants, it was bondage in His mercy, in connection with His house. So the very curse resting on them (see Joshua 9:23) was turned into a blessing. For what do we find? Instead of being destroyed by the sword of the Lord's host, they were rescued. Now, hundreds of years later, they stand in honourable association with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house as well, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow-captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in this present age.
A register of obscure names looks like filler until you ask who wanted it kept. The same writer answers:
The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. It shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only feebly into His thoughts about His house. Even so, He has caused this list to be preserved. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows too that the very names of His people are known and announced, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
The Nethinim did the background jobs of the sanctuary, and their families are listed one by one anyway:
The porters numbered 139. The Nethinim, or lower servants of the sanctuary, together with Solomon's servants, numbered 392 (v. 58). These modest tasks are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly registers all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. Serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, taking care of the "upper room" — the Lord forgets none of it. He records the names of those who have kept the charge of this service just as deservedly as any others. We will see, in more than one case, that the one among the children of God who took the last place, forgetting himself in order to serve others, will occupy a place of honour. Meanwhile a certain remarkable gift, which tended to glorify man rather than Christ, will sit down in shame in the last place.
The same class appears again later. When Ezra summoned helpers, few Levites answered:
There were still fewer than forty Levites, while there were two hundred and twenty Nethinim. Here is another proof. In the comfortable ease of Babylon, the nation's hopes and privileges no longer had any practical power over their minds. Set that against the laziness of the Levites. It is beautiful to notice how many Nethinim (probably of a foreign race) obeyed Ezra's summons.
- Given. The word Nethinim means "given" or "devoted" — to God. Their name says they were handed over for the service of His house.
- Given mercy. If they came from the Gibeonites, their servant status started as a sentence; God turned the curse into bondage "in His mercy in connection with His house."
- Given names. Rezin, Nekoda and Gazzam are not decoration. The list exists because God "looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work."
- Given tasks. Serving tables, passing the bread and cup, caring for the room: modest work is "very valuable in the eyes of the Lord." He records it just as deservedly as any other.
- Given hearts. Later, 220 Nethinim answered Ezra's call while the Levites stayed comfortable. The lowest class in the register proved the most willing to go.
the children of Uzza, the children of Phaseah, the children of Besai,
Ezra 2:49 names three families among the Nethinim — the temple servants who came home from exile in Babylon. Why would God keep a written record of servants we know nothing else about?
The chapter sorts its names into groups. Verse 49 falls after the families of Israel's own tribes:
Looking at this catalogue a little more closely, we find a fourfold division. Down to the end of verse 42 we have those who were clearly of Israel — of Judah, Benjamin, or of Levi (among the last both singers and gatekeepers). Then come two other classes: the Nethinim, and the servants of Solomon. A few words about them will be necessary.
Of the three families here, Scripture tells us little more than that they were there. A reference work sums up one of them in a single line:
Ancestor of some Nethinim, who returned from exile.
The name of the group says what these people were:
The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chron. 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order originated with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites. Joshua appointed them as helpers to the Levites (Josh. 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God with set duties in the temple.
Commentators differ on where they came from. Some call the Gibeonite link likely rather than proven, and one writer traces them to the Amorites.
If these families came from Gibeon, the list is a record of mercy:
This is probably where we find the origin of the Nethinim — those whom God spared from His just judgment. If they were brought into slavery, it was slavery in His mercy, connected with His house. So the very curse resting on them (see Joshua 9:23) turned into a blessing. For what do we find? The sword of the Lord's host did not destroy them. They were rescued. Now, centuries later, they stand in honourable association with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow-captives at this special moment. They are surely no small foreshadowing of the objects of grace even in this age.
Their willingness to return stands out against the Jews who stayed:
The Nethinim were likely Gibeonites who had joined the congregation in Joshua's time. He told them, "None of you shall be freed from being servants, cutters of wood and drawers of water for the house of my God" (Josh. 9:23, older translation). We do not read of any of them refusing this place of submission to Israel. Their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable loyalty to the God of Israel, since they were Gentiles who had been away from Judah for 70 years. After so long an absence, not all of the Jews were ready to return to their own country. So the faith of these Gentile followers shines out all the brighter.
Their story does not stop at the list. They took on the covenant with the rest of the nation:
The people gathered in solemn assembly, and their leaders sealed the covenant. The Nethinim joined in a curse and an oath to walk in God's law, and not to intermarry with the peoples of the land! They were in fact descendants of the Amorites, yet they were now fully part of the nation of Israel. With the faithful in Israel, these men of faith were blessed.
The existence of the register is itself the message:
The first thing to notice is that the very existence of this record shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. That is true however weakly they entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows and proclaims the very names of His people. All this encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
- Given — "Nethinim" means given, or devoted to God; these families served in the temple.
- Spared — if they came from Gibeon, their slavery began as mercy, and the curse on them turned into blessing.
- Loyal — Scripture never records one of them refusing that place of service.
- Grafted — Gentiles, 70 years away, chose the road home, and later sealed the covenant with Israel.
- Counted — God kept the list, because He sees the smallest fruit of His work and makes His people's names known.
the children of Asnah, the children of Meunim, the children of Nephusim,
Three family names — Asnah, Meunim, Nephisim — sit inside a long list of temple servants who returned from Babylon to Jerusalem. The list raises two questions: who were these servants, and why does God write down names like these?
These three families belong to the group called the Nethinim. The name itself carries the explanation.
The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chron. 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order started with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites, whom Joshua appointed as helpers to the Levites (Josh. 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God with set duties in the temple.
Commentators differ here. Some treat the Gibeonite link as likely. Others say only that these families were probably not of Jewish descent.
If the Gibeonite origin is right, these families began in bondage. Notice what God did with it.
Here, then, we probably find the origin of the Nethinim. They were spared from the just judgment of God. If they were reduced to servile bondage, it was bondage in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse resting on them (see Joshua 9:23) became a blessing. For what do we find? Instead of being destroyed by the sword of the Lord's host, they were rescued. Centuries later they stand in honourable company with the Lord's people. They had a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment. They are no small picture of the objects of grace even in this present age.
Their duties were small and out of sight. The verse still records their family names.
The Nethinim, the lower servants of the sanctuary, together with Solomon's servants numbered 392 (v. 58). These modest functions are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly registers all the names of their fathers. In the same way today, whether it is a matter of serving tables, of passing the bread and the cup, or of caring for the "upper room," the Lord forgets none of it. He records the names of those who have kept the charge of this service just as rightly as the others. And we shall see, in more than one case, that the child of God who took the last place, forgetting himself to serve others, will hold a place of honour. Meanwhile a certain remarkable gift, which tended to glorify man rather than Christ, will sit down in shame in the last place.
God kept this record on purpose.
He has kept this list on record as evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. He knows and announces the very names of His people. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to identify with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
The list runs from leaders and priests down to these families. The last group is not the least.
And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim (v.43) and Solomon's servants (v.55). These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they did lowly work. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. In the same way, members of the body of Christ have different tasks, duties, and abilities. The most prominent ones may not be the most important ones (1 Cor. 12).
The Nethinim appear again later in the book. When Ezra called for helpers, the numbers told their own story.
There were still fewer than forty Levites, while there were two hundred and twenty Nethinim. It is another proof that in the easy comfort of Babylon, the nation's hopes and privileges had lost all real power over their minds. Set against the laziness of the Levites, the number of Nethinim who obeyed Ezra's summons is beautiful to notice. They were probably of a foreign race.
- Given. "Nethinim" means given or devoted. They were servants set apart for temple duties, an order that began with David.
- Spared. They most likely began in bondage under a curse. God's mercy turned that curse into a place near His house.
- Named. God records these unknown families as fully as the leaders. The smallest fruit of His Spirit's work gives Him joy.
- Willing. They left the comfort of Babylon. Later they answered Ezra's call in far greater numbers than the Levites.
- Rewarded. The one who takes the last place to serve others will hold a place of honour. Prominence and importance are not the same.
the children of Bakbuk, the children of Hakupha, the children of Harhur,
This verse sits in a long list of names that most readers skim: three families of Nethinim, the temple helpers, among those who left Babylon for Jerusalem. Why did God keep such obscure names, and who were these people?
The word behind the name explains the group. It marks people given over to service at God's house. Writers also trace their likely origin back to the Gibeonites:
A name meaning "given, devoted ones," applied to those who helped the Levites in the service of the tabernacle and the temple. The Gibeonites were made "cutters of wood and drawers of water for the congregation and for the altar." Joshua 9:27. These are not mentioned after 2 Samuel, so they and their descendants may have been the Nethinim. It does not appear that God appointed them, as He did the Levites, but "David and the princes" appointed them "for the service of the Levites." Ezra 8:20. After the return from exile the Nethinim are called the "ministers of this house of God."
Commentators treat this Gibeonite link as likely, not proven.
If these families did descend from Gibeon, then their low rank was itself mercy:
It is here, then, that we probably find the origin of the Nethinim — those who were spared from the just judgment of God. If they were reduced to servile bondage, it was bondage in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse resting on them became a blessing. For what do we find? Instead of being destroyed with the sword of the Lord's host, they were rescued. Now, centuries later, we find them in honourable company with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow-captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in the present age.
Seventy years away from the land — yet the families of Bakbuk, Hakupha and Harhur went back. Many Jews would not, and that makes their choice stand out:
We do not read of any of them refusing this place of submission to Israel. Their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable allegiance to the God of Israel, since they were Gentiles and had been away from Judah for 70 years. After so long an absence, not all of the Jews were ready to return to their own country. So the faith of their Gentile followers shines out all the brighter.
Why keep such a list at all? Its very existence is the answer:
The first thing to notice is that this list exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people, however weakly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It proves that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that He knows the very names of His people and proclaims them. That is an encouragement to all to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to keep faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
The verse says nothing about these families except that they came. Small tasks like theirs still matter:
These modest functions are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly records all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. Serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, taking care of the "upper room" — the Lord forgets none of it. He records the names of those who have kept charge of this service, and they deserve it as much as any others. In more than one case we shall see that the one among God's children who took the last place, forgetting himself to serve others, will hold a place of honour.
Another writer sees in such details how little we know of God's care:
Even their animals are counted. How ignorant man is of God! How good for His people! From His word they can learn of His interest in themselves and in everything that belongs to them. Their estate may be low, yet His notice of them is all the more striking.
- Given — "Nethinim" means given or devoted ones. They helped the Levites. David and the princes appointed them, not God directly, as far as the record shows.
- Spared — they likely came from Gibeon. God spared them from judgment and gave them a servant's place near His house, so the curse became a blessing.
- Returned — Gentiles by birth, and away from Judah for seventy years, they still went up. Many Jews stayed behind.
- Recorded — God kept this list because He rejoices over the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. He knows His people by name.
- Rewarded — quiet service still counts today. The Lord records it, and the one who took the last place will hold a place of honour.
the children of Bazluth, the children of Mehida, the children of Harsha,
This verse sits in a list of temple servants — the group older translations call the Nethinim. They came back from exile in Babylon with the priests and Levites. It names three households and says nothing else about them. So why does God write down the names of people who did the lowest work?
A reference work gathers what their name means and what they did:
The name means "given, devoted ones," and it belongs to those who helped the Levites serve in the tabernacle and the temple. The name does not occur until 1 Chronicles 9:2, and afterwards in Ezra and Nehemiah. The Gibeonites were made "cutters of wood and drawers of water for the congregation and for the altar" (Joshua 9:27). No book after 2 Samuel mentions them, so they and their descendants may have been the Nethinim. God does not appear to have appointed them, as He did the Levites. Instead "David and the princes" appointed them "for the service of the Levites" (Ezra 8:20). After the return from exile the Nethinim bear the title "ministers of this house of God." Like the priests and Levites, they paid no "toll, tribute, or custom" (Ezra 7:24).
Writers treat the link with the Gibeonites — the woodcutters and water-carriers of Joshua 9 — as likely, not certain.
If that origin is right, then the ancestors of Bazluth, Mehida and Harsha were people who should have been destroyed. One writer traces what mercy did with them instead:
So this is probably where the Nethinim began. God spared them from His just judgment. If they were brought into slave-like bondage, it was bondage in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse that rested on them (see Joshua 9:23) turned into a blessing. For what do we find? The sword of the Lord's army did not destroy them. They were rescued. Now, centuries later, we find them in honourable association with the Lord's people. They had a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow-captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in this age.
A list of unfamiliar names looks like filler. The same writer asks why God kept it:
The first thing to notice is the list itself. Its existence shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — however feebly they may have entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list safe. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It also shows that the very names of His people are known and announced. That encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to keep faithful in times of corruption and apostasy.
The Levites already held a supporting role in the temple. These families supported the supporters:
In Ezra 8:20 we read, "Also of the Nethinim, whom David and the princes had appointed for the service of the Levites." Today they would perhaps match those who do many services behind the scenes, as we may say. Many things are necessary and have to be done week by week. People often take them for granted, but someone has to do them.
What is such modest service worth to the Lord, and where does it end?
The Nethinim, the subordinate servants of the sanctuary, together with Solomon's servants, numbered 392 (v. 58). These modest functions are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly registers all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. Whether it is serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, or taking care of the "upper room," the Lord forgets none of it. He registers the names of those who have kept charge of this service just as deservedly as the others. And we shall see, in more than one case, that the child of God who took the last place, forgetting himself to serve others, will hold a place of honour. Meanwhile a certain remarkable gift, which tended to glorify man rather than Christ, will sit down in confusion in the last place.
- Given. Their name means "given, devoted ones." They helped the Levites, and later Scripture calls them the ministers of God's house.
- Spared. Their likely ancestors faced destruction. Mercy put them in bondage near God's house, and the curse became a blessing.
- Named. Centuries later their descendants return. God records the families, because He values even the smallest fruit of His work in a heart.
- Hidden. They served those who served. The weekly work gets taken for granted, but someone must do it.
- Honoured. God registers the one who takes the last place and forgets himself in serving others. That servant will hold a place of honour.
the children of Barkos, the children of Sisera, the children of Thamah,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
the children of Neziah, the children of Hatipha.
Neziah and Hatipha are two more family names in a long roll-call of the Nethinim — the temple servants who returned from exile with the remnant. Names like these are easy to skip. Yet God kept them on record, and commentators read in them both a question of origin and a lesson in grace.
The name itself tells you what these families were:
Name, meaning "given, devoted ones," applied to those who assisted the Levites in the service of the tabernacle and the temple. The Gibeonites were made cutters of wood and drawers of water (Joshua 9:27). They are not mentioned after 2 Samuel, so they and their descendants may have been the Nethinim. It does not appear that God appointed them, as He did the Levites, but "David and the princes" appointed them "for the service of the Levites." Ezra 8:20… After the return from exile they are called "servants of this house of God." Like the priests and Levites, they paid no "tribute, custom, or toll." Ezra 7:24. Ezra 2:43-54 lists them.
One writer finds the origin of the Nethinim in that sentence of servitude:
This is probably where the Nethinim began. They were spared from the just judgment of God. If they were reduced to slavery, it was slavery in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse that rested on them (see Joshua 9:23) turned into a blessing. For what do we find? The sword of the Lord's host did not destroy them. They were rescued. Centuries later they stand in honourable association with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow-captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in this present time.
Their willingness to leave Babylon stands out against the Jews who stayed:
We do not read of any of them refusing this place of submission to Israel. Their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable allegiance to the God of Israel. They were Gentiles, and they had been away from Judah for 70 years. After so long an absence, not all of the Jews were ready to return to their own country. So the faith of these Gentile followers shines out all the more brightly.
The same contrast appears later, when Ezra gathered a second group:
There were still fewer than forty Levites, while there were two hundred and twenty Nethinim. The comfortable ease of Babylon had drained the nation's hopes and privileges of any practical power over their minds. Next to the laziness of the Levites, it is beautiful to see how many Nethinim (probably of a foreign race) obeyed Ezra's summons.
Commentators name their ancestors differently, yet by the sealed covenant no distance remained between these families and Israel:
One more fact is even more remarkable than the very long list of the Nethinim who returned with Zerubbabel, given in both Ezra and Nehemiah. The people gathered in solemn assembly, and their leaders sealed the covenant. The Nethinim bound themselves with a curse and an oath to walk in God's law, and not to intermarry with the peoples of the land! They really were descendants of the Amorites, yet they were now thoroughly joined to the nation of Israel. With the faithful in Israel, these men of faith were blessed.
The existence of the register is itself the point:
The very existence of this list shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have entered only weakly into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list on record. It is evidence that He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. He knows the very names of His people and proclaims them, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption.
Their place was support, not leadership, and one writer finds encouragement in that:
It is remarkable that the Nethinim were the ones keeping the source of refreshment for the people of God. That should encourage all those who may not be able to take on any prominent service. Many a simple service can be used to set the affections of the saints free, and so enrich the service of God.
- Given. "Nethinim" means the given, devoted ones. David and the princes, not a direct command of God, put them at the temple to help the Levites.
- Spared. Their likely ancestors were Gibeonites, sentenced to servitude. The curse became mercy, because that service tied them to God's house.
- Willing. Outsiders by birth, they left Babylon when many Israelites would not. Later 220 of them answered Ezra's call, against fewer than 40 Levites.
- Joined. At the sealing of the covenant they stood fully one with Israel. They swore to keep God's law and to stay separate from the surrounding peoples.
- Named. God kept every family name on record. He sees the smallest fruit of His work, and quiet, supporting service still refreshes His people.
The children of Solomon's servants the children of Sotai, the children of Sophereth, the children of Peruda,
The list of those who came home from Babylon ends with its lowest ranks: the sons of Solomon's servants, named family by family. Why does God keep the names of temple workers who may not even have been Israelites?
Who were they? One commentator admits how little is certain:
Then comes the record of the sons of Solomon's servants. These, with the Nethinim, were three hundred and ninety-two. We know nothing certain about these other servants. Their duty seems to have been like that of the Nethinim. Some think they were the descendants of the foreigners Solomon enlisted to build the temple.
(The Nethinim, listed just before them, were lower servants of the sanctuary.) Another writer links the name to forced labour Solomon imposed on peoples left in the land, and then asks what brought these servants back:
About these servants the information is less clear. But we read that Solomon put the Amorites and other peoples left in the land under lasting forced labour (1 Kings 9:19-21). Israel had not been able to destroy those peoples completely. The descendants of these people may be the ones known as "Solomon's servants." However that may be, the same lesson holds: the least connection with the Lord's people and the Lord's things becomes a means of blessing — usually blessing in this life rather than spiritual blessing. Yet with "the servants of Solomon" there must have been more, for through grace they had returned, of their own desire, to help build the house of God at Jerusalem.
A list of obscure families can look like filler. One commentator reads its very existence as the point:
The fact that this list exists shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. They may have grasped His thoughts about His house only weakly. Still, He kept this list. It proves that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It proves too that He knows the names of His people and makes them known, to encourage everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
Their service was lowly. One writer applies that to anyone who serves out of sight today:
These modest tasks are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God carefully records all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. Whether it is serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, or taking care of the "upper room", the Lord forgets none of it. He records the names of those who kept this service just as fittingly as the others. And we shall see, in more than one case, that the child of God who took the last place, forgetting himself to serve others, will hold a place of honour. Meanwhile a striking gift, which tended to glorify man instead of Christ, will sit down in shame in the last place.
Where did such servants come from? One commentator traces the Nethinim back to peoples God spared, and sees mercy in their servitude:
Here, then, we probably find the origin of the Nethinim — those whom God spared from His just judgment. If He brought them down to slavery, it was slavery in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse that rested on them turned into a blessing. Instead of dying by the sword of the Lord's army, they were rescued. Centuries later we find them honoured among the Lord's people, with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they came back from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment.
Their return stands out against those who stayed behind:
We do not read of any of these servants refusing this place of submission to Israel. Their willingness to return to Judah shows a remarkable loyalty to the God of Israel, since they were Gentiles and had been away from Judah for 70 years. After such a long absence, not all the Jews were ready to return to their own country. So the faith of these Gentiles who had joined Israel shines out all the brighter.
One writer carries the same thought into the church:
And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim and Solomon's servants. These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they were occupied with lowly service. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. In the same way, members of the body of Christ have different tasks, duties, and abilities. The most prominent ones may not be the most important.
- Origin — No one knows for sure who these servants were. Writers suggest foreigners Solomon used to build the temple, or peoples he forced into labour.
- Mercy — God spared them instead of destroying them. Their slavery was mercy tied to His house, so a curse became a blessing.
- Loyalty — They were Gentiles, yet they came back after seventy years away. Many Jews stayed home. Their faith shines the brighter.
- Record — God writes down the names of those who did the smallest jobs. He looks with joy on the least fruit of His Spirit's work.
- Reversal — The one who takes the last place to serve others receives honour. Being prominent is not the same as being important.
the children of Jaalah, the children of Darkon, the children of Giddel,
Jaalah, Darkon and Giddel are three of the last names in the long register of Jews who came home from exile. They were not from Israel's tribes but from "the sons of Solomon's servants" — the lowest group on the list. So why does God write down their family names at all?
The chapter sorts the returning people into groups. These three names fall in the last group.
Commentators differ on where this group came from. One view treats the matter as open:
Then comes the record of the children of Solomon's servants. These, with the Nethinim, numbered 392. We know nothing certain about these other servants, whose work seems to have been like that of the Nethinim. Some take them to be the descendants of the foreigners whom Solomon had enlisted to build the temple (1 Kings 5:13).
Another writer sees no doubt about their origin. He also asks why only eleven of their families are named:
1 Kings 9:20-21 makes it perfectly clear who these people descended from. In the glorious days of the first kingdom we meet them as slaves. Now, on Israel's return from captivity, the children of eleven of these original inhabitants are honourably mentioned as sharing the fortunes of the nation. Had these eleven, whose names are recorded, stood out by their whole-hearted devotion, each to his own lowly task?
These families may have started as forced labour. Even so, the tie to God's people did them good.
The work behind these names was menial, and that is exactly why the list matters.
There were 139 gatekeepers. The Nethinim — the lower servants of the sanctuary — together with Solomon's servants numbered 392 (v. 58). These modest duties are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly registers all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. Serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, taking care of the "upper room" — the Lord forgets none of it. He records the names of those who have kept the charge of this service just as deservedly as any other.
A human record-keeper would have left the men of verse 56 out.
And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim (v. 43) and Solomon's servants (v. 55). These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they were occupied with lowly service. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. In the same way, the members of the body of Christ have different tasks, duties and abilities. The most prominent members may not be the most important ones (1 Cor. 12).
A few verses later, some priests lose their standing. They cannot prove their family line, while these servants keep their place on the list.
How striking and instructive! Some failed to prove their title and were discredited. Whatever the cause, failing to show the father's house was fatal! They might really be priests; but if their title could not be found, they were treated as unclean and removed from the priesthood.
- Lowest place. Jaalah, Darkon and Giddel head families in the last group on the list: the servants of Solomon. They come after Israel, Levi and the Nethinim.
- Outsider origin. Their ancestors may not have been Israelites at all — either foreigners drafted for temple work, or slaves of Solomon's reign.
- Gift of nearness. Even the slightest link to the Lord's people and the Lord's things became a channel of blessing for them. And they came back of their own desire to help build God's house.
- Reach of the record. God notices the lowest jobs. He writes down the names of those who serve tables and keep the room. The most visible workers are not always the most important.
- Result at the roll-call. God keeps these unknown servants on His list. Priests who could not prove their family line were set aside. A place among God's people rests on what He records, not on reputation.
the children of Shephatiah, the children of Hattil, the children of Pochereth-Hazzebaim, the children of Ami.
Ezra 2 lists the families who came back from exile in Babylon to rebuild Jerusalem. Verse 57 closes the roll of "the sons of Solomon's servants" with four names almost no one remembers. Why would God keep the family names of temple workers? And why record the lowest group in the nation as fully as the priests?
This list survived. That tells us about God before it tells us about the people on it.
The first thing to notice is that this record exists at all. That shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people — however weakly they may have grasped His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has kept this list. It shows He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that He knows and announces the very names of His people. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
The chapter sorts the returning company into groups. These last names belong to the two lowest: the Nethinim, servants of the sanctuary, and Solomon's servants.
Here, then, we probably find the origin of the Nethinim — those who were spared from the just judgment of God. They were reduced to slave labour, but it was slavery in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse resting on them became a blessing. Instead of dying by the sword of the Lord's army, they were rescued. Centuries later we find them in honourable association with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they came back from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in this age. About Solomon's servants the information is less clear. But we read that Solomon imposed lasting forced labour on the children of the Amorites and others left in the land, whom the children of Israel had not been able to destroy completely (1 Kings 9:19-21). The descendants of these men may be the ones who received the title "Solomon's servants." Either way, the lesson already drawn is again telling: the smallest link with the Lord's people and the Lord's things becomes a means of blessing — not always spiritual blessing, but nearly always earthly blessing. But with Solomon's servants there must have been more than this. Through grace they had returned, by their own desire, to help build the house of God at Jerusalem.
Commentators differ here. Another writer compares their duty to the Nethinim but leaves their origin open:
Then comes the record of the children of Solomon's servants. We know nothing certain about these extra servants. Their duty looks much like that of the Nethinim. Some take them to be the descendants of the foreigners whom Solomon enlisted in the building of the temple (1 Kings 5:13).
The names in this verse are ordinary, and one of them even carries a hometown. Reference works can say little more than that a man existed, served, and had descendants who came home:
Hattil. Servant of Solomon, whose descendants returned from exile. Ezra 2:57; Neh. 7:59.
Zebaim. The place to which Pochereth, a servant of Solomon, belonged. Ezra 2:57; Neh. 7:59.
The care taken over these obscure families carries straight into everyday Christian service.
The gatekeepers numbered 139. The Nethinim, or lower servants of the sanctuary, together with Solomon's servants, numbered 392 (v. 58). These modest duties are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God is pleased to record all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. The Lord forgets none of it — serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, looking after the "upper room". He records the names of those who kept this service, and they deserve it as much as any. And we shall see, more than once, that the child of God who took the last place, forgetting himself to serve others, will hold a place of honour. Meanwhile a striking gift, which tended to glorify man rather than Christ, will sit down in shame in the last place.
What God does with a list, He also does with a church.
And God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim (v.43) and Solomon's servants (v.55). These may not have been of Jewish descent, and they were occupied with lowly service. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. It is the same in the body of Christ. Members have different tasks, duties, and abilities. The most prominent ones may not be the most important ones (1 Cor. 12).
- Recorded — God kept this list. It shows He sees with joy the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work, and that He knows and announces His people's names.
- Rescued — These families came from peoples under judgment. Slavery tied to God's house turned the curse on them into a blessing.
- Returned — Centuries later they stand in honourable association with the Lord's people, back from Babylon with a heart for His house.
- Ranked — Modest duties are very valuable in God's eyes. The one who takes the last place to serve others will hold a place of honour.
- Remembered — God takes account of those we might have forgotten. In the body of Christ, the most prominent members may not be the most important.
All the Nethinim and the children of Solomon's servants, three hundred and ninety-two.
The list of returning exiles ends with one total for two groups: the temple servants (called the Nethinim in older translations) and the descendants of Solomon's servants. They are named after the priests, Levites, singers and gatekeepers, which raises the question of who they were and why God counted them.
One commentator explains the name and the arrangement behind it:
The word seems to mean "those that are given." From the place where their names appear in this chapter (see also 1 Chr. 9:2), writers have concluded that they came from another race, but had been given to the Levites at the start to serve them. In the same way the Levites had been given to Aaron for the Lord's service in His tabernacle — though the Levites were given by God's own command, and in the place of Israel's firstborn (see Num. 8).
A second writer adds where the group started and who they may have been:
The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted" — that is, given to God. According to Ezra 8:20 this order started with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites, whom Joshua appointed as helpers to the Levites (Josh. 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God, set to certain duties in the temple.
Joshua had spared the Gibeonites, but he put them under a curse and made them servants at the house of God. Set against that, their place in this list is striking:
This is probably where the Nethinim came from: people who were spared from the just judgment of God. They were brought down into slavery, but it was slavery in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse that rested on them (see Joshua 9:23) was turned into a blessing. For what do we find? Instead of being destroyed by the sword of the Lord's army, they were rescued. Now, centuries later, they stand in honoured company with the Lord's people. They had a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment. They are surely no small picture of the objects of grace even in our own day.
The second group in the total is harder to identify, and writers say so:
Then comes the record of the children of Solomon's servants. These with the Nethinim were three hundred and ninety-two. We know nothing certain about these other servants, whose duty appears to have been much like that of the Nethinim. Some take them to be descendants of the foreigners whom Solomon had drafted to build the temple (1 Kings 5:13).
Others point instead to the forced labour Solomon imposed on the Canaanite peoples left in the land. Either way, the same conclusion follows:
However this might have been, the lesson already drawn is again significant, that the least connection with the Lord's people and the Lord's things becomes a means of blessing.
The number is small, and so was the work. One commentator finds the point of the list right there:
The Nethinim, the lower servants of the sanctuary, together with Solomon's servants numbered 392 (v. 58). These modest jobs are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly records all the names of their fathers. It is the same today. Whether it is serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, or taking care of the "upper room", the Lord forgets none of it. He records the names of those who have kept charge of this service just as fittingly as the others. And we shall see, in more than one case, that the child of God who took the last place, forgetting himself to serve others, will hold a place of honour.
Any register might easily have dropped these men: outsiders by birth, doing the lowest tasks. God's record runs the other way:
God even takes account of those we might have forgotten: the Nethinim (v.43) and Solomon's servants (v.55). They may not have been of Jewish descent, and their service was lowly. But God is pleased to mention all the names of the fathers of those who went up to Jerusalem. In the same way, in the body of Christ, members have different tasks, duties and abilities, and the most prominent ones may not be the most important ones (1 Cor. 12).
- Given — the name means "those that are given," or "devoted." These men were handed to the Levites to serve God's house, just as the Levites were given to Aaron.
- Spared — their likely ancestors, the Gibeonites, escaped judgment and became servants instead. In God's mercy the curse on them turned into a blessing tied to His house.
- Reached — writers are not sure who Solomon's servants were. The lesson holds either way: the least link with the Lord's people and the Lord's things becomes a means of blessing.
- Counted — 392 people did lowly work, and God listed them family by family. He values such modest service and forgets none of it.
- Honoured — the one who takes the last place and forgets himself in serving others will hold a place of honour. The most prominent servants are not always the most important.
And these are they that went up from Tel-melah, Tel-harsha, Cherub-Addan, Immer; but they could not shew their fathers' house, nor their seed, whether they were of Israel.
Ezra 2 is a careful headcount of the people who came back from Babylon to rebuild, family by family, town by town. Verse 59 turns to a group who made the journey but could not produce what the whole list rested on: proof that they belonged to Israel.
The returning exiles had learned what dealing with the surrounding nations cost them. They made sure the rebuilt community would not repeat it.
The first thing to notice is this. They had felt what it was to deal with the Gentiles. They had experienced the power and wickedness of those whose help they had once sought. So the children of the captivity resolve that Israel shall be an unmixed Israel, and proved to be so. They are most careful in verifying the genealogies of the people, and of the priests, so that none but Israel should share in the work. This was a return, and the disorder that sin had brought in was no longer to be endured.
Tel-melah, Tel-harsha and the rest were places of exile, and exile is where the records slipped away.
In the land of their exile they had not taken the same care about title and qualification. Babylon stands for the corruption that God's people are in bondage to through their sins. So their captivity was a time of carelessness. They were suffering under the hand of their God, but it was still a time of confusion and disorder. It had to be so, since they were without the temple, without sacrifices, and without the Lord's presence.
These families were not turned back at the road, though the record later loses sight of them.
There were six hundred and fifty-two who had joined the company from the Babylonian places Tel-melah, Tel-harsa, Cherub, Addan and Immer. They were the children of Delaiah, of Tobiah and Nekoda. These could not show their descent. They were allowed to return with the rest, but their names are not found in Ezra 10:25-43 or in Nehemiah 10:15-28.
The verdict on them was narrower than it first sounds, and for the priests it left a door open.
If any could not show their genealogy, they had no claim to take part in the work they had been called to… They were not told that they were not priests. The ground taken was that their claim was not proven. It might be proven at a future time… When that time came, the priest would once more have divine intelligence and discernment through the light and perfection of God (Urim and Thummim). He might then judge them to be truly priests. Meanwhile their claim was forfeited. Grace could restore what was lost under law; only for this they must wait patiently.
Nobody waved the missing papers through. The refusal was honest about the state of that day.
This problem could only arise because priestly service had stopped for 70 years, and because of all the confusion the Babylonian captivity brought… Under the circumstances, the best course is to take account of our weakness and not to pretend to have what we do not have. It must have been hard to refuse those priests. But doing so showed that they put God first, not human feelings.
Commentators also draw a personal lesson. Mixing with the world leaves people unsure where they belong.
Mingling with the Gentile world had caused the Israelites to lose the certainty of their nationality. Is it any wonder, then, that the mixing of the church with the world has left so many unsure whether they are the saved children of God?… Clearly there were many Israelites who could not show their genealogy. There are many Christians who cannot show it either. They are so confused by the false position they are in that they cannot tell whether their names are written in heaven or not.
So where does certainty come from? Not from old records, but from Christ.
We must know Jesus, the Great High Priest in the presence of God. He once bore our sins on the cross, but He is now crowned with glory… In His face shine the lights and perfections of God. How can you enter the holiest place by the blood of Jesus if you are uncertain whether you are saved? Oh, search the register. Never rest, my reader, until this first question is settled.
- Register: the returning exiles checked every family line. Israel was to be an unmixed Israel, and only Israel would share the work.
- Babylon: the missing records are the fruit of captivity. It was a time of carelessness and disorder, with no temple, no sacrifices and no presence of the Lord.
- Mercy: the 652 still travelled up with everyone else. They lost their standing and their place in the later lists, but not the journey itself.
- Unproven: the ruling was that they had not proved their claim, not that it was false. The question stayed open until a priest with Urim and Thummim should stand up. Grace could still restore what was lost under law.
- Certainty: what Israel lost by mixing with the nations, believers can lose by mixing with the world. Search the register by looking to the Great High Priest, not at yourself.
The children of Delaiah, the children of Tobijah, the children of Nekoda, six hundred and fifty-two.
This verse names three families — 652 people in all — who came home from exile with everyone else. They could not prove they belonged to Israel, and the chapter turns on that gap: how did the record get lost, and who carries the loss?
One writer points back to the seventy years in Babylon. There, the care over a man's title had fallen away.
In the land of their exile they had not taken the same care about title and qualification. Babylon stands for the corruption that holds God's people in bondage through their sins. So the time of their captivity was a time of carelessness. They were indeed suffering under the hand of their God, but it was still a time of confusion and disorder. It had to be so, since they were without the temple, without sacrifices, and without Jehovah's presence.
These families came home with everyone else. But their names stop appearing in the later lists.
There were 652 who had joined the company from the Babylonian places Tel-melah, Tel-harsa, Cherub, Addan and Immer. They were the sons of Delaiah, of Tobiah and Nekoda. These could not show their descent. They were allowed to return with the rest, but their names are not found in Ezra 10:25-43 or in Nehemiah 10:15-28.
Earlier generations had faced no such check. The remnant began it because this was a return, not a beginning.
The children of the captivity resolve that Israel shall be an unmixed Israel, and they mean to prove it. They take great care to verify the genealogies of the people and of the priests, so that none but Israel would share in the work. In the past, one priest followed another with no examination beforehand. No one verified the genealogy, and children simply stepped into their father's place and enjoyed the privileges God had granted them… This was not the beginning of their history, nor the power suited to a beginning. It was a return, and they would no longer put up with the disorder that sin had brought in… So even among those who had come back to Judea, anyone who could not produce his genealogy was set aside. Divine discernment might perhaps recognise them and their rights another day, but the people who had returned from captivity could not do so.
If some families arrived with no register, others arrived with theirs intact. Holding on to a scroll of ancestry through seventy years in a foreign empire took conviction, because nothing in Babylon made it look useful.
Happy the man who had preserved his own, and who had so valued the heritage of Jehovah as to attach worth to it! It was a proof of faith, for someone might have said, What use are these genealogies in Babylon?
In settled times no one had to produce a genealogy. A time of ruin changes that, and one writer says where the loss then falls.
Here we find the first feature which ought to mark a remnant. In normal times a man was not held accountable to present his genealogy. It was plain to everyone that a priest could not claim a place which did not belong to him. In a time of ruin it is quite different. When foreign elements have broken into the house of God, the faithful must keep close watch to oppose any mixing with the world… The case is the same today: the greatest vigilance is needed, to make sure that the life of God is really joined to the Christian profession. Those whom the assembly of Israel could not acknowledge, even though they might really be part of the people, had no one to blame but themselves if they were not admitted to the service of the temple.
The strength of the remnant's action was that it admitted what it could not settle. It neither invented a title nor pretended the problem away.
How striking and instructive! A day of weakness demands care not to go beyond our measure. Only power can clear up deadlocks. Some failed to prove their title and lost their standing… But whatever the cause, failing to show the father's house was fatal!
- Babylon — Seventy years of captivity, with no temple and no sacrifices, was a time of carelessness. These families came home carrying its cost in a lost record.
- Counted — They came home with the rest. This verse names and numbers them, yet their names drop out of the later lists.
- Unmixed — The remnant checked every genealogy. This was a return, not a beginning, and they would no longer put up with the disorder sin had brought in.
- Faith — Keeping a register through exile proved faith. In Babylon, people could ask what use such papers were.
- Owned — A day of weakness calls for care not to go beyond our measure. Failing to show the father's house was decisive, and the loss lay with those who had let the record slip, not with those who asked.
And of the children of the priests the children of Habaiah, the children of Koz, the children of Barzillai; who took a wife of the daughters of Barzillai the Gileadite, and was called after their name.
The list of returning exiles pauses over some priests who could not prove they were priests. One family among them even carried a name that was not their own — and the verse tells us why.
Exile had made such checking impossible. The return made it urgent. One writer sets the two times side by side.
In the land of their exile they had not taken the same care about claims and qualifications. Babylon stands for the corruption that holds God's people in bondage through their sins. So their captivity was a careless time — a time when they suffered under the hand of their God, and still a time of confusion and disorder. It had to be so, since they had no temple, no sacrifices, and no presence of the Lord. But through the mercy of their God there had been a recovery — partial, it is true, but the Spirit of God was clearly at work in it. Now the Lord's house was to be their centre again, so they were right to weigh the claim of everyone who had returned from Babylon.
Another writer explains why the problem could not have arisen earlier, and names what they had lost.
This problem could only arise because priestly service had stopped for 70 years, and because of all the confusion that came with the Babylonian captivity. In other words, it was a result of the ruin of the people — and, of course, of some carelessness by these priests, if indeed they were priests, in keeping their documents together. There was a further difficulty: they no longer had the Urim and Thummim, as they once did. These would have let them find out the truth.
The strange detail in the verse is a priest who married into Barzillai's family and took his wife's family name.
One writer explains why that match looked so good, and what it cost.
No doubt the marriage was considered a very good match for the young priest, and it brought wealth, riches and honour with it. Barzillai was a very great man, and so immensely wealthy that he could support the king out of his own money while the king was rejected. It was no light thing to become the son-in-law of such a man. The young priest, against God's order, gave up his own name and took the name of his wife. So in Ezra he stands with the name "Barzillai." His own priestly name is gone — gone, it appears, in his desire to get on in the world, for riches, wealth and honour. No doubt he gained all these, and he probably thought the price he paid was very small. How little he knew that his act would cost his children their blessed, privileged place as priests five hundred years later! But we cannot gain advancement in the things of the world without loss in the things of heaven.
The exclusion that follows in verse 62 was not a verdict that these men were frauds.
They were not told that they were not priests. The ground taken was that their claim was not proven. It might be proven later, and so "the governor told them that they were not to partake of the most holy food, until there should be a priest to consult Urim and Thummim." When that day came, that priest would again have divine intelligence and discernment through the light and perfection of God, and he might judge them to be true priests. But meanwhile they lost their claim. Grace could restore what was lost under law; only, for that they must wait patiently.
One writer looks ahead to the priest they were waiting for.
"Until there should be a priest to consult Urim and Thummim" — that is, until the Lord Jesus comes. He will no doubt be the King, and He will also act in the full power of priesthood, the power of Urim and Thummim in the lights and perfections of God. He will then untangle all the confusion and supply all that is lacking.
Human judgment offered a way out of the deadlock. One writer shows what faith did instead.
"Decide the matter by human rules of evidence," is the natural reply. "Settle their status one way or the other, by the best light we have." That is how man brings his own wisdom into the things of God. But Zerubbabel was a man of faith. He would not act without God. No thought of convenience, no wish to strengthen the priesthood, would make him put them in without God's sanction... What a lesson for the day of ruin! How refreshing is the faith that, when God gives no guidance, refuses to act in the wisdom of the flesh or for convenience. It simply stands still and waits on God.
- Ruin. The missing registers point to a wider collapse: seventy years without priestly service, and some carelessness about the papers.
- Compromise. One ancestor married well and gave up his own name for it. That is why his family could no longer trace their line.
- Cost. Five centuries later his children paid for that choice. They lost their place as priests. Gain in the world meant loss in heaven.
- Restraint. The leaders did not call these men false priests, only unproven. They refused to settle the doubt by human evidence or for convenience.
- Waiting. They left the case open until a priest with Urim and Thummim should come. One writer sees here a pointer to the Lord Jesus, who will untangle all the confusion and supply all that is lacking.
These sought their genealogical register, but they were not found; therefore were they, as polluted, removed from the priesthood.
Seventy years in Babylon had broken the paper trail, and now a group of families claiming priestly descent came home to find no record of their names. The register said nothing about their sincerity. Yet it settled everything about their place. Why should a missing document cost a man his ministry?
One commentator points to two causes running together: the collapse of the nation and carelessness with papers.
It is important to see that this sort of problem would not have arisen in the early days. Back then, everyone knew who the priests and their families were. This problem could only arise because priestly service had stopped for 70 years, and because of all the confusion that came with the Babylonian captivity. In other words, it was a consequence of the ruin of the people. And, of course, of a certain carelessness in these priests — if indeed they were priests — about keeping their documents together. An added difficulty was that they no longer had the Urim and Thummim, as they used to, which would have let them find out the truth.
A second writer connects that carelessness to what Babylon itself stood for.
In the land of their exile they had not taken the same care about title and qualification. Babylon represents the corruption to which God's people are in bondage through their sins. So the period of their captivity was a time of carelessness. They were suffering under the hand of their God, but it was still a time of confusion and disorder. It had to be, since they were without the temple, without sacrifices, and without the Lord's presence. But now, through the mercy of their God, there had been a recovery... and now that the Lord's house was once more to become their centre, they were right to be careful about the title of everyone who had returned from Babylon.
The exclusion rested on missing evidence, not on a verdict about these men. (Older translations read "as polluted, put from the priesthood.")
When the remnant who returned found certain priests who could not show their genealogy, they put them out of the priesthood. This was not because anyone could disprove their claim, but because no one could prove it. No one could decide whether they were really priests. There was no recognised way of getting an answer from God.
Another writer draws the line between what the leaders could judge and what they left with God:
The mere claim of descent by the person in question was not enough. In times of ruin, someone who lays claim to a title must prove his right to it. Not that Zerubbabel questioned the claim. That he left to God. "The Lord knows those who are his" (2 Tim. 2:19). But they could only decide on clear evidence.
One writer traces the missing name back to a wedding generations earlier.
Long years before, one of their forefathers married a daughter of Barzillai the Gileadite. No doubt it seemed a very good match for the young priest. Against God's order, the young priest gave up his own name and took the name of his wife. So in Ezra he stands with the name "Barzillai". But his own priestly name is lost. It was lost, it seems, in the desire for worldly advancement, riches, wealth and honour. No doubt he gained all these, and he probably thought the price he paid was very small. But how little he thought that his act, five hundred years later, would cost his children their blessed, privileged place as priests!
The ruling suspended these men; it did not finish them.
They were not told that they were not priests. The ground taken was that their claim was not proven. It might be proven at a future time... Meanwhile their claim was forfeited. Grace could restore what was lost under law; only for this they must patiently wait.
The same writer brings this home to Christians today.
It is essential to realise that the church, as far as its practical testimony and state go, is in ruins today... Under the circumstances, the best course of action is to take account of our weakness and not to pretend to have what we do not have. It must have been hard to refuse those priests. But doing so simply showed that they put God first, not human feelings.
- Cause — ruin lost the register: seventy years without priestly service, plus careless record-keeping.
- Cost — one ancestor traded his priestly name for a rich marriage. His children paid for it five centuries later.
- Charge — "unclean" here means unproven, not disproved. No one doubted their hearts, only their papers.
- Conduct — the leaders judged by the evidence in hand. They left the rest with God and claimed no power they no longer had.
- Conclusion — the ruling held the case open. What law forfeited, grace could restore to those willing to wait.
And the Tirshatha said to them that they should not eat of the most holy things, till there stood up a priest with Urim and with Thummim.
The exiles had come home, but not every record had survived. Several families claiming priestly descent could not prove it, so the governor barred them from the priests' food until a priest with Urim and Thummim could settle the case.
The ESV says simply "the governor." The writers here use an older translation, which keeps the word behind it: Tirshatha.
A great number of priests "looked for their genealogical register, but they were not found; so they were treated as unclean and removed from the priesthood. And [Zerubbabel] the Tirshatha (a Persian word: the name given in Ezra and Nehemiah to the governor of Jerusalem under the Persian kings) said to them that they were not to eat of the most holy things..."
No one had evidence against these men. The problem was that no one had evidence for them, and the usual way of asking God had gone.
When the remnant who returned found priests who could not show their genealogy, those priests were put out of the priesthood. No one had disproved their claim; they could not prove it. There was no one to decide whether they truly were priests, and no recognised way of getting an answer from God. So they were told to wait until a priest stood up with Urim and Thummim.
This was a suspension, not a verdict. The door stayed open.
They were not told that they were not priests. The ruling was only that their claim was not proven. It might be proven at a future time... but meanwhile their claim was forfeited. Grace could restore what was lost under law; only for this they must wait patiently.
There was an obvious fix: settle it by the best evidence available and fill out a thin priesthood at the same time. Zerubbabel refused.
"Decide the matter by human rules of evidence," is the natural reply; "settle their standing one way or the other, by the best light we have." That is how man brings his own wisdom into the things of God. But Zerubbabel was a man of faith. He would not act without God. No motive of convenience, not even the need to strengthen the priesthood, would make him put them in without God's approval... What a blessed and refreshing faith this is! When God gives no guidance, it refuses the wisdom of the flesh and the pull of convenience; it stands still and waits patiently on God.
The names of the two say what they did — and this verse marks where they were lost.
These two words mean "Light" and "Perfection." No one knows just what they were or how they worked. After the captivity in Babylon they were lost, as Ezra 2:63 shows. What seems certain is that through the Urim and the Thummim people could ask God and get an answer, so that divine light could be shed on dark points in Israel's history in a perfect way.
The ruling ends by pointing to a person still to come.
"The Tirshatha (or governor) said to them that they were not to eat of the most holy things" — that is, they were not to have the full enjoyment of priestly privilege — "until there stood up a priest with Urim and with Thummim." That is, until the Lord Jesus comes by and by. He will, no doubt, be the King, and He will also act in the full power of priesthood, the power of Urim and Thummim, in the lights and perfections of God. He will then untangle all the confusion and supply all that is lacking.
For Israel, that priest has still not stood up.
Israel after the flesh has never had this since, and least of all when they refused the Lord Jesus. It will not always be so. They will look on Him whom they pierced; and then there will be pardon and peace, power and blessing.
The decision cost something, and one writer applies it to us.
In these circumstances, the best course is to face our weakness and not to pretend to have what we do not have (v.63). It must have been hard to refuse those priests, but doing so showed that they put God first, not human feelings.
- Lost. Urim and Thummim, "Light" and "Perfection," were the way to ask God and get a clear answer. This verse shows they were gone after the captivity.
- Unproven. No one disproved these priests. They could not prove their claim, and no way remained of settling it.
- Suspended. No one told them they were not priests. Their claim stayed open for a future day, and they had to wait.
- Unforced. Zerubbabel would not settle it by human evidence, even to fill out a thin priesthood. With no word from God, he stood still.
- Awaited. The ruling points to a priest yet to stand up. He will untangle the confusion and supply what is lacking. Until then, honesty about weakness beats pretending.
The whole congregation together was forty-two thousand three hundred and sixty,
The register closes with a single total for everyone who came up out of Babylon: 42,360. That one figure raises two questions. Why count a group this small? And why is the total larger than the names listed?
The count only shows its true size when set beside what the nation once was.
To a casual observer it must have seemed quite a small matter. About 42,000 Jews were restored to the land of their fathers under the leadership of Zerubbabel (Ezra 2). And remember that in the days of Jehoshaphat Judah could keep a standing army of 1,160,000 men (2 Chron. 17:12-18). Next to that, the returned remnant was poor indeed. It was "a day of small things," as Zech. 4:10 expresses it.
Most of the people stayed where they were. One writer sets the proportion plainly — of those who could have gone, only a fraction did:
But in grace God remembered the faithful remnant. He moved the heart of Cyrus, the king of Persia, to let the Jewish people return to Jerusalem after the seventy years of captivity. Isaiah had prophesied this 150-200 years before (Isa. 45). Only a small part of Judah and Benjamin made use of this opportunity. The majority had no longing for the God-given land nor for Jerusalem where the temple had stood.
A small figure did not mean a small interest on God's part.
The whole assembly totaled 42,360, plus servants and singers adding 7,537 to the number. This was only a small percentage of Judah and Benjamin, but the Lord took account of every one... But at least Judah did have "a little strength" (Compare Revelation 3:8).
The register records a choice. Every person in that total had to get past the arguments for staying in Babylon.
And God took note carefully of all those who overcame the many counter-arguments and who went up. It is good to see a recovery of priestly activity among the people (v.36), as well as of service by the Levites (v.40). But Levites always seem to be in short supply. Here we find just 74 Levites for about 4,000 priests.
Add up the families named earlier in the chapter and you do not reach 42,360. The chapter itself explains part of the gap.
So the number of people registered was 29,166 (Ezra 2:1-35; 36-58). But the whole assembly together consisted of 42,360 persons (v. 64). Among them, 652 (v. 60) of the children of Israel could not prove that they were really part of the people.
So "the whole assembly together" covers more than those whose descent stood on record. The people screened that record with care, and still let the unproved travel home with them.
These verses tell us how careful the people were not to tolerate anyone among them whose origin was in any way doubtful. They were determined that Israel should be an unmixed Israel... There were 652 who had joined the company from the Babylonian places Tel-melah, Tel-harsa, Cherub, Addan and Immer. They were the children of Delaiah, of Tobiah and Nekoda. These could not show their descent. They were allowed to return with the rest, but their names are not found in Ezra 10:25-43 or in Nehemiah 10:15-28.
Two tribes out of twelve made the journey, and not even all of those. Their view of the nation stayed wider than their numbers.
There they were, a minority from two tribes out of 12. And yet they are conscious of the whole people. They offer 12 male goats, making the point that the people was made up of 12 tribes, that all 12 tribes had sinned, and that the only way for God to bless and forgive them would be through the sin offering. Ten tribes were completely absent. Many who belonged to Judah and Benjamin had stayed in Babylon. Neither fact stopped them from remembering the whole people before God.
The small figure looks like a verdict on the whole venture. Those who went refused to read it that way.
But faith does not follow such considerations, however reasonable and correct they may seem. It does not look at circumstances. It does not judge whether a chosen path is right by the results that appear. It does not count upon the number of people making common cause with it. It does not let history judge God's instructions. It judges history by obedience to God's commandments.
- Counted small. Judah once fielded an army of over a million. Now 42,360 came home — a day of small things.
- Counted individually. The percentage was small. Still, the Lord took account of every one who overcame the arguments for staying.
- Counted together. "The whole assembly together" runs ahead of the names listed. It takes in 652 who could not prove their descent and travelled home anyway.
- Counted for all. A minority from two tribes still remembered all twelve before God. They offered a sin offering for every tribe.
- Not counted by numbers. Faith does not measure a course by how many join it, but judges history by obedience to God's Word.
besides their servants and their maids, of whom there were seven thousand three hundred and thirty-seven; and they had two hundred singing men and singing women.
The chapter's long list of families ends with people no census usually bothers with. It counts household servants, and two hundred men and women whose work was to sing. Why does God's record keep counting after the important names are done?
Earlier in the chapter another group of servants appears: those attached to the sanctuary. The people counted here served in ordinary homes, and one writer draws the contrast:
Verse 43 speaks of the servants of the sanctuary. By contrast, verses 64 to 67 tell us of the servants and maid-servants of the people, for God does not forget them either. In one way or another, they fulfil their service. It may be washing the feet of the saints. It may be the humblest service for those who belong to the Lord. It may be no more than a cup of water given to one of these little ones. God keeps it in mind and records it.
The counting does not stop at people. What God records tells us something about Him:
Even their animals are counted. How little man knows of God! How good for His people! From His word they may learn how much He cares about them, and about everything that belongs to them. Their estate may be low, but His notice of it is all the more striking. Is this the way of man, Lord Jehovah?
Two hundred singers travelled with a company just released from Babylon. Read one way, that number is the sound of the exile ending:
Singing was clearly a very prominent occupation on the journey toward the homeland. Their groaning was over. The captivity was behind them and freedom ahead. How beautiful the chanting of their great psalms must have been as they travelled. But a greater time is still coming. The wandering remnant, so long scattered among the nations, will turn homeward. Through the coming of their King their groaning will end forever, and they will sing the Hallelujah chorus in the kingdom of righteousness and peace.
Commentators differ over these two hundred voices. Where one hears recovered joy, another hears the first crack in a movement:
But look closely at who made up this crowd, and you will see the sure signs of coming decline and decay. What, for example, had these pilgrims to do with singing men and singing women? Their land was desolate. Fire had destroyed their sanctuary, and it lay in ruins. They themselves were only a feeble remnant, just freed from captivity. Surely it was no time for entertainment and song! Sadly, man soon limits every work of the Spirit of God that revives the hearts of His people. He limits it by his own thoughts and desires.
Rossier offers a third reading: this singing was not the praise of the holy place that the sons of Asaph led, but served "to maintain, outside the set service of worship, the mutual communion of the people of God."
The whole company came to a little over forty-two thousand, with the servants and singers added on. Set beside the nation Judah had once been, the totals are small. One writer compares them with Solomon's stables:
This was only a small percentage of Judah and Benjamin, but the Lord took account of every one... As to the number of horses alone, this was nothing compared to Solomon's 40,000 stalls of horses (1 Kings 4:26). But at least Judah did have "a little strength" (compare Revelation 3:8).
- Counted. The list goes past leaders and priests to household servants, singers and animals. God keeps account of everyone and everything that belongs to His people.
- Cared for. God notices and records the humblest service, down to a cup of water given to one of the little ones.
- Low. God does not despise a small company with few horses. Their low estate makes His notice more striking, not less.
- Contested. Writers read the two hundred singers in different ways. Some hear joy after Babylon, some hear fellowship among the people, some hear an early sign of decline.
- Coming. The songs on that road home point ahead to a greater homecoming. Then the scattered remnant's groaning ends forever under their King.
Their horses were seven hundred and thirty-six; their mules two hundred and forty-five;
The list of returning exiles ends by counting animals as exactly as it counted people. Why does Scripture keep a count of livestock, and what do these numbers say about the company that travelled from Babylon to Jerusalem?
The surprise is not the numbers but that God recorded them at all. One writer draws a lesson from the counted animals:
God counts even their animals. How little man knows of God! How good it is for His people, who may learn from His word that He is interested both in them and in everything that belongs to them. Their condition may be low, but His notice of them is all the more impressive. Is this the way of man, Lord Jehovah?
These animals were useful, not decorative. One writer sees in the count a provision God made in advance:
Lastly, so that nothing might be forgotten, God even takes account of the animals (vv. 66, 67) — of everything which is useful to His people and helpful to them. He counts these too with care, and does not overlook a single one. What care this counting shows us! All along the journey that was to bring them to the house of God, God Himself had watched over His people. He had prepared the relief they needed for their weariness. He had made provision beforehand for the needs of the weak, the women and the little children. What a God is ours! Should we look for a better guide, a better guardian? Is not our Father the Creator and Keeper of all things?
Only a small part of the nation came home, and their resources matched their size. One writer sets the horse count beside Israel's wealth under Solomon:
The whole assembly totalled 42,360, plus servants and singers adding 7,537 to the number. This was only a small percentage of Judah and Benjamin, but the Lord took account of every one. Their livestock numbered 736 horses, 245 mules and 6,720 donkeys. As to the number of horses alone, this was nothing compared with Solomon's 40,000 stalls of horses (1 Kings 4:26). But at least Judah did have "a little strength" (compare Revelation 3:8).
The phrase quoted from Revelation is from an older translation; the ESV reads, "I know that you have but little power."
Counting means something when God does it. Writing about the census of Israel in the wilderness, one commentator explains what:
He was careful in this way to assert His title and to survey His possessions. He wanted the number of Israel brought to Him exactly, for they were all His own. He called them by their names, and knew their numbers.
He states the principle directly: "The act of numbering is the symbol of appropriation. To number things expresses ownership of them" (J. G. Bellett). So the count of animals is a mark of God's ownership over the whole company.
The animal count closes a chapter full of names. One writer explains what the survival of such a record proves:
The first thing to notice is the very existence of this record. It shows how precious to God was the response His grace had produced in the hearts of His people. That is true however weakly they had entered into His thoughts about His house. For this reason He has preserved this list. It is evidence that He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. It shows that He knows and announces the very names of His people. All this encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to be identified with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
- Counted — The count reaches past the people to the animals. God is interested in His people and in everything that belongs to them.
- Carried — The animals were provision arranged in advance. They brought relief for weariness and care for the weak, the women and the children.
- Little — 736 horses were nothing beside Solomon's 40,000 stalls. Yet this small company still had "a little strength" for the work.
- Owned — To number a thing is to claim it. God's count asserts His title, and He knows both the names and the numbers.
- Remembered — The list survives as proof that God delights in the smallest fruit of His work. He keeps a record of faithfulness in a corrupt time.
their camels four hundred and thirty-five; the asses six thousand seven hundred and twenty.
The list of returning exiles ends with animals. Camels and donkeys carried these people across the desert from Babylon to Jerusalem — so why does God count pack animals in His Word?
The list does not stop at people. One writer notes what comes next:
Even their animals are counted. How ignorant man is of God! How good for His people! From His word they can learn of His interest in them and in everything that belongs to them. Their situation may be low, but His notice is all the more striking.
Camels and donkeys were not ornaments. Tired people, women and children crossed hundreds of miles of open country on them. Counting them points back to who provided them.
Finally, so that nothing might be forgotten, God even takes account of the animals (vv. 66, 67) — of everything that is useful and helpful to His people. These are also carefully counted, without overlooking a single one. What care this numbering shows us! All along the journey to the house of God, God Himself watched over His people. He prepared the relief they needed for their tiredness. He provided in advance for the needs of the weak, the women and the little children. What a God is ours! Should we look for a better guide, a better guardian? Is not our Father the Creator and Keeper of all things?
Put these totals beside the nation at its height and they look thin. One writer makes that comparison and still finds something to credit:
The whole assembly totalled 42,360, plus servants and singers adding 7,537 to the number. This was only a small percentage of Judah and Benjamin, but the Lord took account of every one. Their livestock numbered 736 horses, 245 mules and 6,720 donkeys. As to the number of horses alone, this was as nothing compared to Solomon's 40,000 stalls of horses (1 Kings 4:26). But at least Judah did have "a little strength" (compare Revelation 3:8).
The same principle runs through the chapter's closing gifts. What was given was modest, and that did not lower its worth:
The chief fathers voluntarily give a sum... This was little indeed, compared to what the chief fathers had formerly offered for the building of Solomon's temple (1 Chron. 29:6-9), but in a time of extreme poverty this gift had great value in the eyes of the Lord of the temple. He, the owner of all the treasures of the universe, valued it according to the zeal that moved them to offer it, just as later He valued the widow's small coin more than the surplus of the rich.
The travellers moved as one company. One writer looks closer at who made it up:
This was the large company that travelled from Babylon to Judah and Jerusalem. Their hearts were set on the holy task God had called them to. But look closer at the parts making up this crowd, and you will find the sure early signs of decline and decay... Man quickly limits every working of the Spirit of God that brings revival in the hearts of His people. He limits it by his own thoughts and desires. Even the first response to His mighty power gathers people who are really under His influence — and others too, who will corrupt the movement and make sure it fails outwardly.
The whole inventory of Ezra 2 reappears later in Scripture, and that repetition is treated as deliberate:
Chapter 2 gives us the number and the names of the company that went up. The Spirit of God attaches such importance to this company that He records their names a second time, in the book of Nehemiah.
The same writer turns the register into a question for the reader:
Your name may be in the Lamb's Book of Life. Every redeemed sinner's name is there, all grace and mercy for Christ's sake alone. But does your name also have a place in what answers to Ezra 2?
- Counted. The register runs past people to animals. Nothing His people own falls outside His interest, and a low situation makes His notice more striking.
- Carried. God provided the camels and donkeys in advance — for tired travellers, for the weak, for women and children on the road to His house.
- Small. Next to Solomon's 40,000 stalls these totals are nothing. Yet the Lord counted every one, and a gift given in poverty is valued like the widow's coin.
- Mixed. The same caravan that set out on God's errand already carried the seeds of its own decline. Revival gathers the genuine and the corrupting together.
- Recorded. God kept this list and repeated it in Nehemiah. Your name may be in the Lamb's Book of Life — but is it also among those who went up?
And some of the chief fathers, when they came to the house of Jehovah which is at Jerusalem, offered freely for the house of God to set it up in its place.
The exiles reach Jerusalem. The first recorded act of their family heads is to give — freely, for a building that does not yet stand. Two questions follow. How could they come to "the house of the LORD" when the temple lay in ruins? And what makes a gift acceptable when the givers are poor?
The wording is careful. It does not say they came to the ruins. One writer asks the obvious question:
It is beautiful to read in verse 68 that "they came to the house of God." What house, one might ask. The temple had been burnt many years ago and nothing had been rebuilt. But they had come to the right place, and in God's eyes this is where His house has to be and is.
So the site itself held God's claim. The gift is for raising the house "on its site" — God had fixed the place before anyone laid a stone. Another writer notes why the exiles went straight there:
They must have gone at once to the ruins of the former temple, because that was the spot they loved. It is significant that although it was leveled to the ground, it still existed in the mind of God, and also in the thoughts of the people.
The same wording tells us what moved the givers. What they saw when they arrived opened their hands:
It seems God used the ruined state of His sanctuary to touch the hearts of these heads of families. When they came to the LORD's house, they saw its condition. The sight moved them, and they "made freewill offerings" out of what they owned. The Spirit of God is careful to note, putting His approval on the act, that "according to their ability they gave." In this they are examples for all time to those of the Lord's people who have the privilege of serving the Lord.
Note the order: they looked, the sight moved them, they gave. No one appealed to them for money.
The verse calls these gifts freewill offerings. One writer shows what that word rules out:
The principles in these statements apply to every age. The apostle Paul enforces the same when he says, "Each one must give as he has decided in his heart, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver" (2 Cor. 9:7)... So it matters more than anything to remember this: everything offered to God must come from hearts made willing by His Spirit. It must be spontaneous. It must not come from persuasion or outside pressure, but from the heart. The church of God would be in a very different state today if it had remembered this. What has caused more ruin than the many worldly schemes for raising money?
Their total looks large on its own. Set beside Solomon's day, it was small:
In verses 68 and 69 we find a second mark of these returned people: zeal for the building of the house of God. This is the devotion that sacrifices its own interests for the work of the Lord. The heads of families give a sum of their own free will... This was very little compared with what the heads of families had once given for building Solomon's temple (1 Chr. 29:6-9). But in a time of extreme poverty this gift had great value in the eyes of the Lord of the temple. He owns all the treasures of the universe, and He valued the gift by the zeal that moved them to offer it. In the same way He later valued the widow's two small coins more than the surplus of the rich.
The text does not say they tithed. It says they gave in proportion to what they had. That measure is what carries over:
They were faithful in their giving, not according to the Law, the tenth part, but according to their ability. And in the New Testament the rule for the Church as to giving is stated in 1 Cor. 16:2, "On the first day of every week, each of you is to put something aside and store it up, as he may prosper."
- Sight. They came to "the house of the LORD" when there was no house to see. God still counted the place as His, and so did they.
- Stirred. The ruin itself did the persuading. God used the state of His sanctuary to touch their hearts, and no one had to ask.
- Spontaneous. The offering was free. Gifts to God must come from willing hearts, never from persuasion, pressure, or money-raising schemes.
- Small. Their total was tiny next to Solomon's day, yet God prized it. The Owner of everything weighs the zeal behind a gift, as with the widow's two small coins.
- Standard. Not a fixed tenth but "according to their ability." The New Testament keeps the same measure: each gives as he prospers.
They gave after their ability to the treasure of the work sixty-one thousand darics of gold, and five thousand pounds of silver, and one hundred priests' coats.
The long list of returning exiles ends with money. Leading families reach a burnt-out temple site and hand over gold, silver and priests' garments — a sum far smaller than Israel once gave, and measured only by "their ability."
One writer counts this gift among the marks that the return was genuine:
And when they got there, "they offered freely." This is another feature of this revival. There is a genuine interest in the things of God, in His work. And we read that "they gave according to their ability."
The text says they came to "the house of the LORD," though no house was standing. That wording explains what moved them to give:
Notice the form of the statement: "When they came to the house of the LORD at Jerusalem." It shows that the house still existed before the eye of God, whatever its outward condition, and even though it had been torn to the ground. So although three different temple buildings stood up to the time of the Lord, it was always the same house in the mind of God… God seems to have used the ruin of His sanctuary to touch the hearts of these leading men. When they came to the LORD's house and saw its condition, it moved them, and they "offered freely" of what they owned. The Spirit of God is careful to note it, setting His seal of approval on the act: "they gave according to their ability."
No law fixes the amount. The standard is what each person has, and one commentator carries it straight into Christian practice:
They were faithful in their giving — not according to the Law, the tenth part, but according to their ability. And the New Testament states the rule for the Church about giving in 1 Corinthians 16:2: "On the first day of every week, each of you is to put something aside and store it up, as he may prosper."
Measured against Israel's past, the total is thin. Measured against the givers' poverty, it is large — and God measures it the second way:
In verses 68 and 69 we find a second mark of these returned exiles: zeal for the building of the house of God. It is the devotion that sacrifices its own interests for the work of the Lord. The leading fathers willingly give a sum worth about two and a half million francs. This was little indeed compared with what the leading fathers had once offered for the building of Solomon's temple (1 Chr. 29:6-9). But in a time of extreme poverty this gift had great value in the eyes of the Lord of the temple. He owns all the treasures of the universe, and He valued this gift by the zeal that prompted them to offer it. In the same way He later valued the widow's small coins above the surplus of the rich.
Ability sets the amount, so the willing heart becomes the real measure:
Grace refuses all compulsion, but it values, encourages and directs readiness of mind: without this, what is giving worth? Is the gift acceptable? Or the giver? But if the readiness is there, a person is accepted according to what he has, not according to what he does not have. Sentiment disappears; reality takes its place.
- Sight. These leaders arrived at ruins that God still called His house. Seeing it opened their hands.
- Freedom. No one forced the gift. A real interest in the things of God shows up in His work.
- Measure. They gave by ability, not by a legal tenth. The New Testament sets the same rule: each one lays aside as he prospers.
- Heart. Without a willing mind, giving is worth nothing. With it, a person is accepted by what he has, not by what he lacks.
- Value. The gift was tiny beside Solomon's day. Still, the Owner of all treasure prized it, as He prized the widow's small coins above the surplus of the rich.
And the priests, and the Levites, and [some] of the people, and the singers, and the doorkeepers, and the Nethinim dwelt in their cities, and all Israel in their cities.
Chapter 2 ends quietly. After the long lists of names and numbers, everyone goes home to his own town. Does that settling show grace restoring a people to their inheritance, or the first hint that private comfort came before the house of God?
Only a small group came back from exile. One writer sees God's hand in the fact that they filled the towns at all:
Not all of those who returned to Judah worked at rebuilding the temple. For the most part the priests and Levites, some of the people, the gatekeepers and Nethinim lived in their cities. The temple would have had little significance if there were no residents in any of the cities of Judah. The numbers in the cities would be small compared with their size before the captivity. Yet each city would be a testimony to the restoring grace of God. Today also, each little assembly that God restores is a testimony to His grace and faithfulness. But such testimonies give us no reason for pride. We thank God for His goodness, and our own weakness only humbles us.
Commentators differ here. Another writer reads the same sentence as a warning sign, and points to Haggai 1:
The spiritual reader may well ask about this record, especially when it is read in the light of what happened afterwards, as told in Haggai 1. Is it not a symptom of the decay of their first energy? Does it not reveal the tendency to think of themselves and their own houses before the interests of the Lord's house. Solomon spent thirteen years building his own house, and only seven on the temple. Knowing what man is, it is not surprising if the restored remnant began by first minding their own things.
The verse names priests and Levites together. But only seventy-four Levites came back, and one writer explains why:
There was no lack of people, as we shall see in Ezra 8. But on their part there was indifference, spiritual laziness, and no doubt love of their own comfort. So only seventy-four people present themselves to escort the priests, the people, and their chiefs! … Those who have received gifts from the Lord for evangelising, teaching, and feeding the flock of Christ are afraid. They will not go forward with the strength He gives them, or exercise their ministry as the Lord has entrusted it to them.
The verse's last group has a name worth knowing. Older translations leave it as "Nethinim"; the ESV says "temple servants":
The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, to God. … According to Ezra 8:20 this order originated with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites, whom Joshua appointed as helpers to the Levites (Joshua 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God assigned to certain duties in the temple.
Yet God records their family names too:
These modest functions are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord. See how, from verse 43 to verse 57, God gladly registers all the names of their fathers. In the same way today, the Lord forgets none of it — serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, taking care of the "upper room."
The verse ends with all Israel in their separate towns. The next chapter shows them together again (older translations read "cities" where the ESV has "towns"):
The end of the previous chapter states that all lived in their cities — "and all Israel in their cities." Then came the important seventh month (Tishri), with its holy gathering. … The remnant gathered "as one man to Jerusalem." … This gathering "as one man to Jerusalem" reminds us of that other gathering in Jerusalem centuries later, "when they were all together in one place" (Acts 2:1). … Whenever God's people let the Spirit of God show His power unhindered among them, the result is always to bring them together. The Spirit of God never divides, but unites.
- Grace settles them. They reach their own towns because God brought them back. Every small, half-empty city is a testimony to His restoring grace.
- Grace names them. The list records priests, singers, gatekeepers and temple servants alike. The Lord forgets no service, however humble.
- Grace devotes them. "Nethinim" means given. The last group in the list carries a name of dedication to God.
- Grace outruns them. Only seventy-four Levites came home; indifference and love of comfort kept the rest away, and workers are still missing today.
- Grace gathers them. Living in many towns did not scatter them. The next chapter finds them gathered as one man, for God's Spirit never divides but unites.
And when the seventh month came, and the children of Israel were in the cities, the people gathered together as one man to Jerusalem.
The exiles have finished the long road home and settled into their own towns. Then, at a set time, they all leave home again and travel to one city. Why that month, why that city, and why does the whole crowd move like a single person?
This was not a burst of enthusiasm. The calendar explains it. The day named here was already fixed in the law as a summons:
In the book of Numbers we read, "On the first day of the seventh month you shall have a holy convocation. You shall not do any ordinary work, and it shall be a day for you to blow the trumpets." (Num. 29:1) This feast of trumpets pictured in advance the restoration of Israel in the last days. So the people showed true spiritual perception when they gathered in Jerusalem at this time. That perception, together with their perfect unity, showed that both they and their leaders had been taught by God, and were under the power of His word.
The same date carried a second picture. The month opened with a new moon, and one writer sees the returned people in that thin crescent:
Israel had lost divine blessing through their own fault. The people should have reflected the light of the glory of the Lord, just as the moon reflects the sun, but that light had disappeared. Now the new moon, an image of the restored people, had begun to reappear. The full splendour of this light was not yet visible. But this first quarter moon pointed forward to the future showing of the glory of the people of God. What feast could have suited the moment better?
The phrase means more than a large crowd. Commentators trace this oneness back to a single cause:
This gathering "as one man to Jerusalem" reminds us of that other gathering in Jerusalem centuries later "when they were all with one accord in one place" (Acts 2:1)... Whenever God's people let the Spirit of God work His power unhindered among them, He always brings them together. The Spirit of God never divides, but unites.
Such oneness is rare, and no one can manufacture it:
Only seldom in the history of God's people has such oneness appeared. No general agreement can produce it. It comes only when all alike submit together to the power of the Spirit through the truth.
They had just settled in their cities, yet they travelled. Worship had one appointed place:
The remnant gathered "as one man" in the only city in the world that God had chosen. It was the only place where they could take up their long silent, unstrung harps again and worship Israel's God! In Babylon they might pray with the window open toward Jerusalem, and confess their sins. But they could not worship Him there.
Unity meant a shared journey, not just a shared opinion:
The distance of their cities does not stop them from coming to the altar at Jerusalem, and nowhere else, to show this unity.
What they did on arrival showed what they valued. Enemies were near, yet they built no wall first:
Here it was the harvest month, the final one of the Lord's feasts, but it was only a little witness... Had the God of Israel not been before their eyes, they would not have gathered in this way. Human prudence would have hurried to put up a wall against their enemies. Faith and reverence led them to build the God of Israel's altar.
Writers apply the scene to gatherings today, and to any group that feels too few to count:
It is the same today at the Lord's table. Like the altar of the remnant, it shows the unity of the people of God, expressed in "one loaf" in which all share. It mattered little that the Jews were few in number. It matters little if we are only two or three. The altar set up in the middle of the court expressed the unity of all the people. For them, the question was not whether others would follow their example. They had the will of God, announced by Moses, as the basis for their action. The Word bound them; their gathering was an act of obedience. Is it not the same when the saints gather around the memorial of the cross of Christ, the blessed place where the Lamb of God was offered up: the Lamb that was slain, whom we worship, as such, in glory?
- Summoned. The seventh month opened with God's appointed day of trumpets, a picture of Israel's restoration. The gathering began with His calendar, not their planning.
- Gathered. "As one man" is the work of the Spirit, as at Pentecost. Such unity comes when all alike bow to the truth. Agreement alone never produces it.
- Centred. They could pray in Babylon but not worship there. One place drew them, and distance was no excuse to stay away.
- Worshipping. Prudence would have built a wall first. Faith built the altar first. A small, weak company put God's claim ahead of its own safety.
- Repeatable. Being few is no barrier. Two or three bound by God's Word, gathered around the memorial of the cross, express the same unity as the whole restored people.
Then stood up Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and his brethren the priests, and Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and his brethren, and built the altar of the God of Israel, to offer up burnt-offerings on it, as it is written in the law of Moses the man of God.
A priest and a governor stand in a ruined city, and their first joint act is to rebuild an altar. Not a wall, not a house, not even the temple — so commentators ask two questions: why the altar first, and why the verse points back to what Moses wrote.
The verse names a priest and a governor, and gives the altar a purpose.
At least they could build the altar of God, which showed that their relationship with God rested on sacrifice. We too can have no relationship with God apart from the sacrifice of Christ at Calvary. That sacrifice is therefore the basis of true worship. Jeshua the high priest, son of Jozadak, and his brothers the priests joined with Zerubbabel the governor, son of Shealtiel, and his brothers, who were lesser rulers in Judah. Together they rebuilt the altar so that they could offer burnt offerings to the Lord. The burnt offering was the most important of all the offerings. It speaks of the glory God receives from the value of the sacrifice of Christ. They also cared that they did this in line with what Moses, the man of God, had written years before.
Their weakness did not empty their offices of meaning.
Joshua and Zerubbabel stood at the head of those left of Judah and Benjamin. When they returned to Jerusalem, their condition was one of deep humiliation. They were weak representatives of the priesthood and of royalty. Yet at the same time they were forerunners, pictures, of the Messiah in His future glory.
Notice what they did not start with.
It is not that they began with the wall. That stands out all the more because another book, Nehemiah, is devoted to building the wall. They began with God and not with themselves. They began with the great expression of acceptance before God. The altar was the link between God and His people. It was the point of contact between them, the place where they brought their offerings.
One writer reads their choice as a pattern for renewal today.
Their very first priority was to rebuild the altar (v. 2). Building the altar speaks of the recovery of worship. Think how empty their lives must have been in Babylon. They had no altar, no sacrifices for their God, and no worship. Here again, this is a feature of revival. God wants to restore it today to anyone who has lost the privilege of worship.
Enemies were close, and a wall would have been the sensible first project.
Human prudence would have rushed to build a wall against their enemies. Faith and reverence led them to build the God of Israel's altar. They could not do all that Moses and Aaron did, or David and Solomon.
One writer treats the altar itself as their defence.
The altar was re-established by faith. On one side it was the grace of God. On the other side it was faithfulness in man, who recognized Him in his difficulties as his safeguard and wall of defence. The people of God are always in their right place when they adore God and recognize Him as their security and strength.
Their circumstances were unlike anything Israel had known. That is exactly why the phrase matters.
Their first concern was the worship of Jehovah. They returned to God's order and did "as it is written in the Law of Moses." They did not set up something new. They returned to what God had set up before. They set the altar upon its bases — where it had been before.
Weakness gave them no excuse to change the rule.
They had little strength, but they kept His word and did not deny His name. It was all the more striking, because most of Israel stayed far away, scattered among the nations of the east. Godly ones had prayed in their captivity, with windows open toward Jerusalem. But there only did they build an altar, there only offer burnt offerings. Never do we hear of such worship in Babylon, never in Assyria.
Commentators do not all read this chapter as a simple success. One looks at what came next.
Right conduct on a wrong motive must fail. In Ezra 3, we have the Jews working for God, and doing it from the written word. They kept what Moses commanded (v. 2), and they did what David did (v. 10). But they failed. The adversaries of Judah came and stopped the work. The cause of failure was not in the adversaries of Judah. It was in the hearts of the people, which were set on their own things and not on the things of God.
- Altar first. They began with God, not with themselves. Worship came before walls, houses, and even the temple.
- Altar as link. The altar was the point of contact between God and His people, the place of acceptance and of offering.
- Altar as defence. Enemies were near, but faith built an altar instead of a wall and made it their safeguard.
- Altar as written. They invented nothing new. They set the altar back on its old bases, as Moses had written.
- Altar tested. A right start still needed a right motive. The work later stalled, and one writer traces the cause to the builders' own hearts.
And they set the altar on its base; for fear was upon them because of the people of the countries; and they offered up burnt-offerings on it to Jehovah, the morning and evening burnt-offerings.
A small group has come back from exile to a ruined Jerusalem — no wall, no army, no temple, and hostile neighbours all around. The first thing they build is an altar, and the reason the verse gives is fear.
Fear can push a person toward self-protection or toward God. Here it does the second.
This is very beautiful. In a godly spirit, fear did not lead them to protect themselves by human means. Instead their heart turned to the Lord, and to the altar of acceptance they enjoyed through Him. Their first thought was the Lord; they brought Him in between themselves and their trouble from the enemy.
The order of what they built matters.
It is not that they began with the wall. This is all the more remarkable because another book of the Bible is devoted to building the wall — the book of Nehemiah. But they began with God and not with themselves. They began with the great expression of acceptance before God. The altar was the link between God and His people — the point of contact, so to speak, between them — the place where they made their offerings... this is all the more striking because the reason given is that fear was on them, and that fear led them to God and not to themselves or to other men.
One writer puts the principle in a single line.
If we set up our altar, it will serve for walls.
The altar was not put wherever was convenient. It went back on its own base. The verse before says they built it "as it is written in the Law of Moses the man of God."
Despite their fear of the opposition to the true worship of God, they set the altar on its bases. They established their worship on the true basis of the Word of God, not hiding this from the eye of the enemy.
These offerings were not a one-off ceremony.
They presented their burnt offerings morning and evening. When it was first given, this was called the "continual burnt offering" (Exodus 29:38-46), and because of it God had been able to dwell among His people. His presence might no longer be among them, and He might no longer dwell between the cherubim over the mercy seat. Still, the power of the burnt offering remained. As long as faith brought this and presented it to God morning and evening, the people stayed under the Lord's protection as before. They were as safe as in the days when Jerusalem in her glory stood behind fortified walls and defences — in fact, far safer.
Another writer notes which offering this was, and how long it was to run.
It was not the sacrifice for sin, but the burnt offering, the true image of worship. The people were to keep offering it, without any interruption, until the temple was finished.
The altar also answered a question about the group itself: what made them one people?
It made no difference that the Jews were few in number. It makes no difference if we are only two or three. Some of the people had returned from captivity. Others were still scattered along the rivers of Babylon, or in unknown cities of Persia and Media. The altar, set up in the middle of the court, expressed the unity of them all. For them the question was not whether others would follow their example. They had the will of God, announced through Moses, as the basis for what they did.
Why the altar first, and not the temple? Because of what the altar and its offerings stand for.
First they obeyed His Word. They set up the altar for worship and for coming to God in the appointed way. Then they trusted Him to keep them among their enemies. The altar and the burnt offerings morning and evening are pictures of Christ, who is both the altar and the burnt offering. Whenever the Spirit of God sends a true recovery and revival, He will put the Lord Jesus Christ and His finished work first.
- Fear first. The danger was real. It did not send them to build defences; it sent them to God.
- Altar first. They began with God, not with themselves. The altar was the meeting point between the Lord and His people, and it went up before any wall.
- Word first. They rebuilt the altar on its own base, as the Law of Moses directed. Their worship rested on God's Word, in full view of the enemy.
- Christ first. The altar and the morning-and-evening offerings picture Christ. In every true recovery, His finished work comes first.
- Shelter last, and best. With the offering still rising, a people with no walls were safer than the old fortified city. Set up the altar, and it will serve for walls.
And they held the feast of tabernacles as it is written, and [offered] daily burnt-offerings by number, according to the ordinance, as the duty of every day required;
The exiles were fresh back from Babylon. The temple was not yet rebuilt, and enemies surrounded them. Still, this small company sat down to keep a festival of joy. Two things stand out. They measured their worship by what was already written. And they kept it up day by day, by number, before any building stood to house it.
The phrase "as it is written" appears twice in this chapter. Their circumstances were nothing like the days of Moses or Solomon. Still, they went back to the original instructions.
As we begin to read the third chapter, a fourth feature of true revival is plainly shown: obedience to the Word of God. In verse 2, and again in verse 4, we find the words 'as it is written'. Their first recorded action, when back in their land, was to approach their God in the way He had laid down at the first... yet they recognised that what God may lay down at the start of His dispensations stands unchanged to the finish.
That meant leaving behind the habits picked up during seventy years away from Jerusalem.
Whatever they had practised in Babylon, whatever their traditional rites and customs had been, they left it all behind in the place of their captivity. Now, delivered and brought back, nothing could satisfy them short of the authority of the written Word.
They kept the feast before anyone had laid the temple foundation. Hole sees that order as deliberate.
They began with the burnt offering, which lay at the basis of all God's dealings with them. The seventh month had come, so they observed the feast of tabernacles, which fell at that time. This they did though the foundation of the temple had not been laid. The burnt offerings very rightly came before the 'house'.
Enemies surrounded them. What they built first shows what they trusted.
Human prudence would have hurried to put up a wall against their enemies. Faith and reverence led them to build the God of Israel's altar. They could not do all that Moses and Aaron did, or David and Solomon... The burnt offering was the constant expression of approach to Him through an unblemished sacrifice, when everything given to the fire rose up acceptably before Him.
The verse does not stop at the feast. It counts out offerings for each separate day.
So there was no weariness of it: it was no passing act. There was the daily offering. This is a very important thing... It always makes me unhappy to see God's children merely putting in an appearance on the Lord's Day morning — merely keeping up an outward link with the Lord and with His people. I admit there may be circumstances where it cannot be otherwise... but as a general rule, the same faith that makes us value coming together to meet the Lord at His own table ought to make us rejoice to meet the Lord on every occasion, and to grow in the truth by every means.
The feast came at the close of harvest and vintage.
Israel dwelt in booths during the feast, in remembrance of their having lived in tents when brought out of Egypt... It was at the end of their harvest and vintage, when they enjoyed the fruits of God's goodness. The feast prefigures the millennium, when the people will enter into full blessing.
Keeping a feast of joy among ruins looks absurd until you see what carried them.
To human eyes looking at their desolate condition it might have seemed a mockery for these poor returned captives to be keeping a joyful feast. But faith is "the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen," and so brings the future into the present. And once the soul stands before God in all the acceptance of Christ, pictured by the burnt offering, it already holds the certainty of every promised blessing, secured in Him.
This verse holds a distinction in Israel's history that is easy to miss.
The feast of tabernacles was above all a time of rejoicing. But the only time we read of it being celebrated in the Old Testament is here in Ezra 3:4, after the remnant had returned from captivity.
- Written. Everything began with "as it is written" — not with new arrangements to suit their reduced circumstances.
- Altar. Worship came before walls and before the temple foundation. The burnt offering came first, then the house.
- Daily. They counted out offerings for each day. The recovery lasted; it was not one burst of enthusiasm.
- Joy. They kept a feast of gladness among ruins. Faith treats promised blessing as already secure in Christ.
- Forward. The feast pictures the coming age of full blessing for Israel. Its only Old Testament record is here, kept by a small, obedient remnant.
and afterwards the continual burnt-offering, and those of the new moons, and of all the set feasts of Jehovah that were consecrated, and of every one that willingly offered a voluntary offering to Jehovah.
The exiles are home in a ruined Jerusalem, and their first move is not to build but to restore the altar and its sacrifices. So why did worship come first, and what does an uncommanded gift add to a schedule God Himself fixed?
The daily sacrifice here was never meant to stop. Its subject is one thing: a life given up to God in death. One writer explains what it meant, and what it secured:
Its meaning is His devotedness to death. In the place of sin and for God's glory, He proved His obedience to the very end, even to being made sin for His people. So the altar consumed it all, and it went up as a sweet aroma to the Lord. This offering never stopped. By it God laid a foundation on which Israel could stand, accepted in all its fragrance. It becomes a clear picture of the believer's position, and shows the ground of his acceptance in the Beloved.
The word "continual" carries weight here. What the returned people started, they kept up:
There was no weariness of it: it was no passing act. There was the daily offering. This is a very important thing.
The month they started in carried its own message. The moon has no light of its own, and it pictures Israel here:
Israel had lost divine blessing through their own fault. The people ought to have reflected the light of the glory of the Lord, just as the moon reflects the sun. That light had gone out. But now the new moon, an image of the restored people, had begun to reappear. Its full splendour was not yet visible. Yet this first quarter moon pointed ahead to the coming display of the glory of the people of God.
Every item in this verse was already written down. What the exiles had practised in Babylon did not come home with them:
The striking feature of all their proceedings was that they now ordered everything according to the word of God. Whatever they had practised in Babylon, whatever their old rites and customs had been, they left it all behind in the land of their captivity. Now, delivered and brought back, nothing could satisfy them short of the authority of the written Word.
The verse does not end with the calendar. It ends with people who simply wanted to give:
The record does not note only the new moons and the set feasts. It adds, "and the offerings of everyone who made a freewill offering to the LORD." When God's Spirit is acting in power, He fills the hearts of many of His people to overflowing. The vessel cannot hold the blessing, and it runs over in thanksgiving and praise to God. This is the secret both of devotedness and worship.
Worship prompted by a recent kindness fades with the memory of it. A voluntary gift is different:
When the soul goes out to God in a voluntary act of worship, that worship comes from a larger measure of spiritual energy. It is more than worship that only springs from some special mercy felt at the time. But where the Holy Spirit leads the heart out in some voluntary or deliberate expression of praise, it will be of a more lasting character.
God watched all of it, and He credits what His own grace produced:
It was welcome to the heart of God to see His people return to Himself. They owned His claims and the only ground of their acceptance. It shows us how much notice He takes of what His own people do, and that He takes pleasure in their approach and worship. Producing these fruits by His grace in their hearts, with the same grace He puts them to their account.
Yet the altar was only a start. A right beginning can become a resting place:
In faith they built and used the altar without delay, and that was good. It was better still to lay the foundation, and not to settle for that beginning — informal, yet acceptable and right.
- Continual — the daily burnt offering pictures Christ's devotedness to death. It never stopped, so the ground of the believer's acceptance never shifted.
- Written — the exiles brought no Babylonian habits home. Every offering named here was already commanded in Scripture.
- New moon — the seventh month opened with the new moon. Israel's light, long dark, had begun to reappear, with fuller glory still ahead.
- Willing — the closing clause is the overflow. When the Spirit fills a heart, the vessel cannot hold the blessing, and praise runs over.
- Onward — God credits such worship to His people. But a right beginning is not a place to stop; the foundation still had to be laid.
From the first day of the seventh month they began to offer up burnt-offerings to Jehovah. But the foundation of the temple of Jehovah was not [yet] laid.
The order in this chapter is deliberate. Sacrifice began on day one; the building had not even been started.
It is interesting that the returned remnant did not first build houses for themselves. They did not build a big city wall. They did not even rebuild the temple. Their very first priority was to rebuild the altar (v. 2). Building the altar speaks of the recovery of worship. How empty their lives must have been in Babylon, without altar, without sacrifices for their God, and without worship. Again, this is a feature of revival. God wants to restore it today to anyone who has lost the privilege of worship.
They did not wait for a building to be worshippers. What they had was enough to start.
They are quick to raise an altar to the God of Israel. They need not build their Temple first. An altar will do for burnt offerings and for the Feast of Tabernacles. They are a revived people, a people who know they are standing on holy ground again. So on that symbolic day, the first day of the seventh month, they raise their altar and begin their worship.
The date was not accidental. The first day of the seventh month carried its own meaning for a people just back from exile.
The feast of the new moon began with the blowing of trumpets. It took place on the first day of this seventh month. The day suited the state of the people who had come back from captivity, and the grace God had shown them. Israel had lost God's blessing through their own fault. The people should have reflected the light of the glory of the Lord, just as the moon reflects the sun, but that light had disappeared. Now the new moon, a picture of the restored people, had begun to reappear. The full brightness of this light was not yet visible. But this first quarter moon pointed forward to the coming display of the glory of the people of God.
Note what kind of sacrifice they began with. Rossier points out it was "not the sacrifice for sin, but the burnt offering, the true image of worship."
Commentators differ on the tone of the last clause. One reading takes it as a mark of honest growth, not failure.
Thus, you see, there was progress there. No remnant that was ever called out by grace arrived all at once at the truth that God is going to give them. It is a matter of growth as a whole, not only individual growth. But they did not yet come to understand His mind and His word. At the beginning they cannot do what they may understand, and have power for, on a later day.
Another reading hears a warning in it — a first slackening, right at the start.
The sixth verse almost seems to show some decline in spiritual energy at the very start. That has happened in every new movement of the Spirit of God. At least, the statement is very significant: But the foundation of the temple of the LORD was not yet laid.
Whatever the delay meant, Scripture speaks warmly of the offerings they did bring.
The record of the start of the burnt offerings on the first day of the seventh month carries clear delight. It pleased the heart of God to see His people come back to Himself, owning His claims and the only ground on which He accepted them. It shows us how closely He watches what His own people do, and that He takes pleasure when they draw near and worship. Producing these fruits by His grace in their hearts, with the same grace He puts them to their account.
The unfinished foundation is what makes the verse useful now. Worship does not wait for the ruins to be cleared, and it lifts believers into a place the ruins cannot touch.
As in Ezra 3, the heavenly position of God's people could come back to light only by building the altar — that is, by the practice of worship. Where there is worship, the heavenly position of the Church must be understood. Believers do not have an earthly religion, like the Jewish people. Worship brings them into heaven. That stays true when everything around them is in ruin, and the Church, like the temple at the start of Ezra, is no more than a heap of rubble.
- Altar first. They rebuilt worship before houses, walls or temple. Hardt calls this recovery of worship a feature of revival, open to anyone who has lost it.
- Day one. They began at the new moon, on the first day of the seventh month. It was a small returning light that promised fuller glory later.
- Not yet. Commentators read the unlaid foundation two ways: honest growth that could not do everything at once, or an early cooling of energy.
- Received. God took pleasure in the offerings they did bring, and credited fruit that His own grace had produced in them.
- Among ruins. Worship needs no finished building. Rossier says it lifts believers into heaven even while everything around them lies in ruin.
And they gave money to the masons and to the carpenters; and meat and drink and oil to the Zidonians and to the Tyrians, to bring cedar-trees from Lebanon to the sea at Joppa, according to the grant that they had of Cyrus king of Persia.
The altar was standing and the offerings had begun, but no one had yet laid the temple's foundation. Verse 7 records the next steps: wages for workmen, food and drink for foreign suppliers, cedar floated down the coast. It also records the king who allowed it all.
Sacrifice came first, before any building. But the temple was not forgotten. This verse shows the people getting ready for it.
So they did not try new ideas of their own about what might be suitable. They simply went back to God's original Word. They began with the burnt offering, which lay at the basis of all God's dealings with them... This they did though the foundation of the temple had not been laid. The burnt offerings rightly came before the "house". But the house was not forgotten, as verse 7 shows. They started the preparations for it, because it was the main object of their return to the land.
Their giving did not stop at the altar.
They had made a start. They had an altar, but not yet a temple, and not even the foundation. But their generosity extended to the preparations for the building of the house as well (v.7).
The verse traces a supply line. Workers cut cedar in the mountains of Lebanon. They tied it into rafts, floated it down the coast, and landed it at the port that served Jerusalem.
Town and sea-port in the tribe of Dan. It was the port of Jerusalem. Workers cut timber in Lebanon and brought it by sea to Joppa in rafts, for the temple at Jerusalem. 2 Chr. 2:16; Ezra 3:7.
The older wording "the sea of Joppa" is not the name of a separate body of water:
In Ezra 3:7, the meaning is "the sea at Joppa."
Solomon had drawn cedar from the same source when he built the first temple. The comparison cuts both ways.
...in preparation for building, they gave money to masons and carpenters, as well as food, drink and oil to the people of Sidon and Tyre... This was according to the directive of Cyrus. It was nowhere near the scale of Solomon's building of the temple (1 Kings 5:11-14), but the supplies came from the same source.
Set the two houses side by side:
Solomon built the first temple in the glory of his reign. He was a picture of the Prince of peace. He used all the resources of his mighty empire, and of the peoples who paid him tribute, to build a house where Jehovah would live among His people... But now a few weak captives were raising the house. They depended on a Gentile king for the very materials they used, and hostile tribes surrounded them.
The closing phrase is not a footnote. It marks the whole work with a reminder of why they were under a foreign king at all.
Here we must also note that the rebuilding of the house of God could not be separated from the testimony given to its ruin and to the ruin of the people of God. Everything the remnant did, they did "according to the grant that they had from Cyrus king of Persia" (v. 7). Their sins had put them under the nations, and they were to stay conscious of their state... A sense of our ruin should mark us today, as it marked the people in the times of Ezra. We cannot and should not deny it or shrug the burden off our shoulders. We must bear the humiliation of this ruin, and at the same time set the house of God back on its only real foundation, Christ.
Tyre shipped this cedar. Isaiah also spoke of a coming day for Tyre, and one writer weighs whether the two connect.
After the seventy years in which Tyre lay forgotten, we read that "her merchandise and her wages will be holy to the LORD." Isa. 23:17-18. This may refer to Tyre sending cedar trees from Lebanon for the building of the second temple (Ezra 3:7). But we must look to a day still future for the prophecy to be fulfilled.
- Altar — Worship came first. They restored sacrifice by God's original Word, not by ideas of their own.
- Preparation — Their giving reached past the altar. They paid masons and carpenters for a house that had no foundation yet.
- Provision — Cedar came from Lebanon by sea to Joppa, Jerusalem's port. It was the same source Solomon used, on a far smaller scale.
- Permission — Every step ran "according to the grant... from Cyrus." Their own sins had put them under the nations, and they were to own that, not shrug it off.
- Promise — Tyre's timber has been linked to Isaiah's word that Tyre's wages will be holy to the LORD. The real fulfilment still waits for a future day.
And in the second year of their coming to the house of God at Jerusalem, in the second month, began Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and the remnant of their brethren the priests and the Levites, and all they that had come out of the captivity to Jerusalem; and they appointed the Levites, from twenty years old and upward, to superintend the work of the house of Jehovah.
Here the returned exiles move from setting up an altar to building the temple itself. Zerubbabel and Jeshua lead the start and put the Levites over the work, which raises three questions: why the start took so long, why the age limit matters, and what this beginning would cost.
The altar came first; the building waited months longer. One writer sees a test of faith in that wait, and a pattern in the order of events.
We do not doubt that their faith was also tested at the beginning, for nine months passed before the work began. ... The order in this chapter is the building of the altar — that is, worship; then obedience to the Word of God; and then whole-hearted, united service for the Lord. This is the order still for God's people.
Another writer explains the pace. A people gathered by grace grows into the truth over time.
No remnant ever called out by grace arrived all at once at the truth God is going to give them. It is a matter of growth as a whole, not only individual growth. They did not arrive at the understanding of His mind and of His word. At the beginning they are not able to do what they may understand, and have power for, another day.
The verse names the governor and the priest first, and that order is not accidental.
Whatever the state of the people at large, Zerubbabel and Jeshua, the governor and the priest, are foremost in the Lord's work. Officially at the head, they keep the spiritual lead of the people. It is a happy thing for God's people in any age when their leaders know the secret of the Lord's mind. Then they can call the people to follow them in His service. It is not always so. Quite often the Spirit of God acts first among His people, and the leaders in name only are then set aside, or forced to follow to keep their place.
Reaching Jerusalem was not the finish line.
They did not think the whole work was finished just because they had reached Jerusalem — just because God recognised them there as Israelites. Something else was at stake: the LORD's glory... this work is for the house of the LORD, the great shared work of gathering round His name.
The age limit points back to a pattern Scripture had already set.
The governor and the priest know how to bring the people into the holy work alongside them... Finally, the Levites from twenty years old and upward received the task of carrying forward the work of the house of the Lord. This was plainly a return to the order set out in Scripture. It grew out of a God-given understanding of the work they were doing. Keeping God's order in the work of His house matters most of all, because it is really submission to His will as expressed in His word. To human thinking some other method might have seemed better. But the only question for the Lord's servants was, and is: what has He directed?
One writer reads the Levites as a picture of service given to God's people today:
In the second year of their arrival at the house of the Lord at Jerusalem, in the second month, the Levites (who, as we have seen, represent ministry for us) are established according to the mind of God, to oversee the building of the temple.
The Levites who answered the call were a tiny group compared with earlier generations.
There were only seventy-four. In the wilderness they numbered eight thousand five hundred and eighty, and that count included only the men from thirty to fifty years old. When the Lord opened the door out of captivity, very few cared to use it. They had made a home in the land of their exile, and had forgotten Jerusalem. So the faithfulness of these seventy-four was all the more precious to the Lord. With His presence and blessing they were enough for His service as overseers of the workmen in the house of God.
The peace of the first two years ended when the building started.
Throughout the history of God's people, one thing has always held true. Whatever is God's will for the moment becomes the special target of the enemy's attack. So the returned remnant found in their day... For two years the enemy had left them in peace; but as soon as they took up their proper work, according to the will of God, the enemy raised opposition (Ezra 4).
- Delay — Nine months passed before building began. The wait tested their faith, and recovery came by growth, not in one leap.
- Lead — Zerubbabel and Jeshua start the work themselves and draw the people in. Leaders who know the Lord's mind can ask others to follow.
- Order — Zerubbabel and Jeshua appoint the Levites by the pattern Scripture had set. Keeping God's order in His house is simply obeying His will.
- Few — Only seventy-four Levites came back for this work. With God's blessing they were enough.
- Cost — When the real work started, opposition started too. The enemy attacks whatever God wills now.
And Jeshua stood up, his sons and his brethren, Kadmiel and his sons, the sons of Judah, as one [man], to superintend the workmen in the house of God; [also] the sons of Henadad, their sons and their brethren, the Levites.
Work on the temple has begun, and this verse names the Levites who took charge of the workmen. They were very few, yet they stood "together" — so how few hands can God use, and what keeps those hands as one?
These overseers came from the smallest group among those who returned. The Levites were the family set apart for the practical care of God's house. One writer notes how thin their ranks were, and treats that shortage as a lasting pattern.
It is good to see a recovery of priestly activity among the people, as well as of the service of the Levites. But Levites always seem to be in short supply. Here we find just 74 Levites for about 4,000 priests... Those who are willing to do practical work for the benefit of the people of God are famously few. But praise the Lord there are some!
Seventy-four men is a tiny number. One writer says the Lord prized their faithfulness all the more, and points to what held them together.
The more precious to the Lord was the faithfulness of these seventy-four, and with His presence and blessing they were enough for His service as overseers of the workmen in the house of God. Grace had also worked in their hearts, for they stood "together," or, as the margin reads, "as one" in their office. This was true fellowship. It grew out of their communion with the mind of God about His house. His aims were their aims, so they were not held back by divided plans; "as one" they moved the workmen forward.
The same writer calls this unity the clear fruit of the Spirit of God working among them, and a good sign for the building ahead.
The leaders did not choose supervisors for convenience. They followed a pattern Scripture had already set down. They also drew the whole people into the work with them.
The leaders were foremost in the work, and associated the people with themselves in the blessed enterprise... They took hold of the work in earnest. The order in this chapter is the building of the altar for worship, then obedience to the Word of God, and then whole-hearted, united service for the Lord. This is still the order for God's people. In that work they did not ignore God's order but carefully kept it, for the Levites come first (Numbers 4; 1 Chron. 23:24).
What were these men overseeing? One writer first clears away a narrow idea of what counts as work for God.
Many souls at the present time seem to think that the only blessedness and the only thing that is to be called work is the conversion of sinners. Never was a greater mistake.
He adds that he rejoices over every conversion. But there was a second work, and the Levites oversaw it.
But still there is another work... there is work done for the house of Jehovah, the great shared work of gathering round the name of Jehovah. That is what we find was so especially dear to Israel, and this is what they set about when they reached Jerusalem — when each one of them was in his proper place. What brought them together for work was the carrying on of that work. What kept them together was their use of this central place of the name of Jehovah, as the place that had a divine claim on their consciences and on their hearts.
- Few. Only seventy-four Levites returned, against about four thousand priests. Willing hands for practical work are always few.
- Enough. With God's presence and blessing, that small number was enough for the oversight He gave them.
- One. They stood "as one" because they shared God's mind about His house. Shared aims left nothing to divide them.
- Ordered. Scripture had already given this service to the Levites, so the leaders obeyed the written word instead of doing what looked practical.
- Shared. They oversaw the shared work of God's house — gathering around His name, not personal effort alone.
And when the builders laid the foundation of the temple of Jehovah, they set the priests in their apparel, with trumpets, and the Levites the sons of Asaph, with cymbals, to praise Jehovah according to the directions of David king of Israel.
A small group of exiles has come back from Babylon to rebuild, and as the foundation stones go down their first act is praise. So who decides how that praise is done?
They had already built the altar and offered sacrifices before laying a single stone of the house. One writer weighs the two acts.
It was good to build and use the altar without delay in faith. It was better to lay the foundation than to settle for that informal but acceptable and right beginning. No doubt circumstances were unusual. The Persian king held civil authority over them. Most of the people were living among the Gentiles. A new difficulty came from Gentiles brought into the land who copied Jewish forms. Yet nothing should turn faith aside from carrying out the truth — humbly, and without show.
The altar had a written rule behind it. So did the singing.
It was a day of great joy and gladness. For directions about the altar, the sacrifices, and the feasts, they had gone back to the word, "as it is written in the Law of Moses the man of God." In the same way they turn to "the directions of David king of Israel" for guidance in their service of praise.
Their weakness did not lower the standard:
The children of Israel who gathered that day on Mount Moriah were few and weak. Even so, they were careful and exact in obeying the Word. They were doing the Lord's work, and they saw clearly that human thoughts and human wisdom had no place in it. The Lord and the Lord alone must set the pattern for His house.
Each instrument belonged to a particular set of hands.
Three groups stand out in this joyful celebration. There were the priests in their robes with trumpets, and the sons of Asaph with cymbals. Beyond these were the people, who answered the praise they heard with a great shout, because the foundation of the house of the Lord was laid. Only priests were allowed to blow the sacred trumpets. It takes being in the holy place, in the presence of God, in communion with His mind, to know when to sound the notes of testimony and praise. In the same way, only the sons of Asaph — Levites, under the king's order — could use the sacred cymbals.
What they sang was not new.
It has been said, and it is worth recalling, that "a remnant has the brightest features of the original." This is true. We see an example of it when the returned remnant of Israel from Babylon laid the foundation of the temple of the Lord... Then there reappeared the best features of Israel's brightest days. It was the same high note of praise that sounded out when the glory of the Lord filled the temple in Solomon's day.
The house was far from finished. The day still counted.
Everything was not yet accomplished, but they had recognised the basis of truth. That is a reminder of 2 Timothy 2:19, "God's firm foundation stands." When people have departed from the truth, and God stirs His people to return to Him, it is a vital encouragement to be reminded that God's firm foundation stands.
Commentators differ on how to read the day. One writer looks at what came next.
Conduct may go beyond faith. If it does, it will break down. Right conduct on a wrong motive must fail. In Ezra 3 we have the Jews working for God, and that from the written word... But they failed. The adversaries of Judah came and stopped the work. Looking at the outward form, we should have said, "Now here is obedience." But God's eye saw through it all... The cause of failure was not in the adversaries of Judah, but in the hearts of the people.
- Foundation. Building the altar was right. Laying the foundation was better. Faith carries the truth further, even when circumstances are hard.
- Written. Written directions shaped both the altar and the singing — Moses for one, David for the other.
- Ordered. Priests had the trumpets, the sons of Asaph the cymbals, the people the shout. Each part belonged to particular hands.
- Recovered. A small group sang the note of Solomon's best days. A remnant can carry the brightest features of the original.
- Tested. Correct outward obedience is not the same as faith. The work stopped because of the people's hearts, not because of their enemies.
And they sang alternately together in praising and giving thanks to Jehovah For he is good, for his loving-kindness [endureth] for ever toward Israel. And all the people shouted with a great shout to the praise of Jehovah, because the foundation of the house of Jehovah was laid.
The exiles back from Babylon have laid the foundation of a second temple. Their first response is a song — the same words Israel had sung in its greatest days. (Where these writers quote "mercy," the ESV reads "steadfast love.")
The celebration was not spontaneous noise. It followed a pattern already given, and each group had its own part.
This joyful celebration marks out three groups. There were the priests in their robes with trumpets, and the sons of Asaph with cymbals. Outside of these were the people. They answered the praise they heard with a great shout, because the foundation of the house of the Lord was laid. Only priests could blow the sacred trumpets (see Num. 10). To discern when to sound the notes of testimony and praise, you have to be in the holy place, in the presence of God, in communion with His mind. So, in this arrangement, they sang responsively, praising and giving thanks to the Lord.
The same care that shaped the altar and the sacrifices shaped the singing on Mount Moriah, the temple hill.
The children of Israel who gathered that day on Mount Moriah were few and feeble. Even so, they were exact in their obedience to the Word. They were engaged on the Lord's work, and they saw clearly that human thoughts and human wisdom had no place in it. The Lord and the Lord alone must prescribe the method of His house.
They could have sung about their own journey and sacrifice. They sang about God's mercy instead.
Psalm 136 says of God twenty-six times that "His mercy endures for ever." They now acknowledged this about themselves, as those who stood for Israel. It was the confession that no merit on their side had led to the revival in which they had part. It was all on the ground of God's mercy. Every revival God has granted in the sad history of Christendom has rested on the mercy of God, with no merit on our side. Let us never forget this.
These words were not new. They form a thread running from the height of the kingdom, through this day of weakness, and on to a day still ahead.
David in his day, and the whole congregation with him, proclaimed it. Solomon, with the people in unison, years later echoed it again. The returned remnant, in all their weakness, gave expression to it when the foundations of the Temple were laid once more. One day, in full chorus, the people of Israel, returned and delivered at last, will confirm it. Language that suited them nearly three thousand years ago will suit Israel for ever.
A handful of returned exiles could have sung of mercy toward themselves. Instead they named the whole nation.
Their inward joy rises up toward its blessed source as they sing, "For His mercy endures for ever" (Ezra 3:11). Then unselfish faith adds, "toward Israel." Such faith does not limit God in His gracious dealings. It loves to count on His faithfulness toward everyone inside the relationship He has revealed.
Earlier in the chapter they set up the altar; now the foundation is laid. One writer sees Christ in both.
In the midst of the most complete ruin, two things remain unchanged: the work of Christ and His person. Christ is the altar and Christ is the foundation. Christ is our salvation, and Christ is the One on whom we are built forever. Christ is the object of worship and of the unceasing praise of His own. We pass through dark times. Humiliation and deserved reproach are our lot. Even so, we can sing the hymn of the future, for He has not changed. Here we see a small returned group singing the song of the glory still to come, in the midst of the desolation of their history and among the ruins of Jerusalem.
Their own failure had brought the first house down.
Now they had come to a time of reviving. They discovered that God was faithful though they had failed. In a mighty song of triumph they celebrated that "the Lord is good and His mercy endures for ever." What a consolation this was to them; what a comfort and joy it is to us.
- Cause — mercy. The song credits nothing to the builders. Commentators read it as their confession: no merit of theirs produced the revival. Every recovery God grants rests on the same ground.
- Gift — a pattern. Praise followed David's ordinance, with priests, Levites and people each in place. A feeble company still held that the Lord alone prescribes the method of His house.
- Anchor — what never changed. Altar and foundation stood while everything else lay in ruins. One writer sees in them Christ's work and Christ's person. Praise survives the wreckage.
- Reach — "toward Israel." A small returned group sang not for itself but for the whole nation. It counted on God's faithfulness to everyone inside the relationship He has revealed.
- Result — one unbroken song. The same words ran from David to Solomon to these exiles. Writers look for Israel to sing them again in full chorus. Mercy that endures forever needs no new song.
But many of the priests and Levites and chief fathers, the ancient men that had seen the first house, wept with a loud voice, [when] the foundation of this house was laid in their sight; and many shouted aloud for joy.
One foundation drew two sounds from one crowd: loud weeping from men who remembered the first temple, and shouts of joy from the rest. Why the difference, and which response was right?
The laying of the foundation split the crowd along the line of memory.
It caused tears in the older men. They felt how poor the present display of the Lord's glory was among them, compared with what they had once seen. It was a source of joy to the others. They had only known the complete collapse of the Lord's name on the earth. Now their hearts were glad that at least there was a clear and definite confession of that name, as a name with the right to gather His people together — even though they were only a remnant here below. They were both right; and yet how different the expression of their hearts was! Of the two, the older men surely did feel the joy of the foundation being laid. But their sense of sorrow and humiliation for His name outweighed it. So the older men had a more subdued feeling. Both groups were led by the Lord, but in very different measures. I am persuaded that, of the two, the older men had the deeper sense of God's glory.
But why were the men nearest to God the ones in tears?
Yet the old men wept, for they had seen the former house, built according to God's inspired direction. Sadly, we understand this. Anyone who now thinks of what the assembly of God was at the first will understand the tears of these old men. This suited nearness to God. Further off, it was right to hear joy, or at least the confused shout that only announced the public event. For in truth God had stepped in on behalf of His people.
Both cries went up to God at the same moment.
Who can doubt that both the tears and the gladness were equally acceptable to the Lord? Both may equally have been the fruit of His grace working in their hearts.
Do we see these tears as spoiling the day?
No, we do not. We see them as expressing another side of things, which should always be present when we are able to rejoice in some time of revival granted in the mercy of God. However blessed the revival, the memory of the beginning tempers our rejoicing. Grace and power marked those first days under the energy of the apostles, as the early chapters of the book of Acts show. We become aware how small and imperfect anything we may experience is, compared with that. It may not bring tears to our eyes, but it will have a very sobering effect on us, for our good.
Grief over failure still needs somewhere to go.
It is the failure that causes the tears, and we must not be indifferent to it. The truth will not make us indifferent to it — the more we know it, the more deeply we shall feel the failure. But it will not depress us, for we shall turn from it to the Lord, "because He is good, for His mercy endures forever."
What made a modest foundation worth celebrating was not its size but whose house it was.
The laying again of the temple's foundations made the people realise that though Israel had failed, God had not. His purposes and promises remained unchanged. They were a feeble band, and their work was as feeble as they were. Yet they now linked themselves with GOD, HIS PURPOSES, and HIS HOUSE. This is what we must do. Though they were only a remnant, they were able to take up sanctuary service to the Lord. They praised Him "after the ordinance of King David" — and David's day was the brightest hour of Israel's history.
- Memory divides. One foundation drew tears from men who remembered the first house, and cheers from those who never saw it.
- Nearness weeps. The tears suited nearness to God. Further off, the shout still announced that God had acted for His people.
- Both accepted. Tears and gladness were equally acceptable. Both could be the fruit of God's grace in the heart.
- Grief sobers, it does not sink. Seeing how small the present work is sobers us for good. Then faith turns from the failure to the Lord, whose mercy endures forever.
- Feeble hands, unchanged purpose. Israel had failed; God had not. A feeble remnant tied to His house could still worship with the joy of David's day.
And the people could not discern the noise of the shout of joy from the noise of the weeping of the people; for the people shouted with a great shout, and the noise was heard afar off.
The foundation of the new temple drew two sounds from one crowd at the same moment. They blended until no one could tell them apart. Why did one act of God produce shouting in some and loud weeping in others — and which response did God accept?
Memory split the crowd. Those who wept had seen the earlier temple. Those who shouted had known only its loss. What they had seen shaped what they felt.
Why so? It was the cause of tears to the older men. They felt how poor the present expression of the Lord's glory among them was, compared with what they had once seen. It was a source of joy to the others, because they had only known the utter collapse of the name of the Lord on the earth. Now their hearts were glad that at any rate there was a distinct and decided confession of that name as entitled to gather His people together, even though they were only a remnant here below. They were both right, yet how different the expression of their hearts!... I am persuaded that, of the two, the older men had the deeper sense of God's glory.
Both reactions told the truth about that day. Both were welcome to God.
Joy was in His presence and acceptable. Tears confessed the truth. They gave witness to a just sense of what God had been for His people, and of the blessing they had once enjoyed under His hand... and these tears were acceptable to Him. The weeping could not be distinguished from the shout of joy. This was a truthful result: natural and sad, yet fitting in the presence of God. For He rejoices in the joy of His people, and He understands their tears.
Look at who was crying. These were not the least spiritual people there.
Joy could well be unmixed in those who were still young and could not remember the past. They were present at a kind of resurrection of the people. In it they saw the marvellous intervention of the grace of God. Who would want to stop them rejoicing? But the priests, the Levites, and the chief fathers wept. They were in closer communion with God, so they were more conscious of the dishonour brought upon His name. And the old men wept because they had known better times.
God's estimate of the two sounds was not the same as the crowd's.
Even in that hour of loud joy over the foundation laid, the old men wept. They felt the ruin and its moral causes more. God saw and cherished the tears. Men were more alive to the joy that greeted the promising act of that day. Both bore witness that the Lord is good, and His mercy is for ever. That holds true whatever the failure of His people and His righteous notice of it.
The pattern did not end with that crowd.
We see those tears as expressing another side of things. That side should always be present when we are able to rejoice in a time of revival granted in the mercy of God. However blessed the revival, the memory of the grace and power that marked the beginning of things tempers our rejoicing... this, though it may not bring tears to our eyes, will have a very sobering effect upon us for our good.
What God heard that day, He looks for still.
This mixture of joy and loud weeping rose up before God. It was so blended that one could not tell one sound from the other, and "the sound was heard far away." In the same way, some today have at heart the building of the house of God and the laying again of its ruined foundations. Their attitude should show that a true humbling over their state cannot be separated from their joy. That joy comes from celebrating together the work and person of Christ, the only foundation of present and future blessing.
There is somewhere for the weeping to go.
It is the failure that causes the tears, and we must not be indifferent to it. The truth will not make us indifferent to it; the more we know it, the more deeply we shall feel the failure. But it will not depress us, for we shall turn from it to the Lord, "because He is good, for His mercy endures for ever."
- Ruin — the tears came from those who remembered better days and felt the ruin and its causes.
- Mercy — the shouting came from those who had known only ruin, and who saw the grace of God at work for His people.
- Both — neither sound cancelled the other. God rejoices in the joy of His people and understands their tears.
- Depth — both groups were right, yet one writer judges the older men had the deeper sense of God's glory.
- Today — hold humbling and gladness together, and turn from the failure to the Lord, whose mercy is for ever.
And the adversaries of Judah and Benjamin heard that the children of the captivity were building the temple to Jehovah the God of Israel;
The builders had just laid the temple foundation when men arrived offering to help. The verse names them before they speak: they are adversaries, and God's people must learn to spot an enemy who talks like a friend.
Dennett links this moment with what Paul met later.
No sooner had the foundation of the temple been laid than adversaries appeared on the scene. It was so also in New Testament times. Wherever the apostle went and laid the foundation of the assembly, the enemy stirred into action… But as with Paul, so also with Zerubbabel and Jeshua, the enemy took on the appearance of friendship.
Their own words in verse 2 give them away. They claim to have sacrificed to God "since the days of Esarhaddon king of Assyria."
The adversaries were the Samaritans… These words revealed their true origin. They were a mixed race settled by heathen kings in the conquered territory of the house of Israel, the ten tribes. We find their history in 2 Kings 17:24. The king of Assyria brought men from Babylon, Cuthah, Ava, Hamath, and Sepharvaim and settled them in Samaria… One of the captive priests taught them at Bethel the corrupt worship which had ruined the ten tribes.
Rossier reads the word "adversaries" in verse 1 as God's own name for them:
Here God describes the instruments of Satan with this word: "the adversaries of Judah" (v. 1)… The second book of Kings tells us about the religious state of these nations. They kept their gods. At the same time they acknowledged the God of Israel. In the language of the Bible, "these nations feared the LORD and also served their carved images" (2 Kings 17:41).
The verse settles their character before we hear a word from them.
The reader is not left in doubt for a single moment about the character of these would-be helpers of God's people in their work. The Holy Spirit tells us plainly that they were "the adversaries of Judah and Benjamin," although words of peace were on their lips. He knew their hearts, their aims and ends. And indeed they give themselves away in the very words they use… By their own confession they were Assyrians, not children of Abraham, with no claim to belong to Israel. They were, in fact, the ancestors of the Samaritans, who kept trying to push into the place of privilege and blessing. That is why the Jews had no dealings with the Samaritans… From this incident we may learn the source of one of the gravest dangers in the work of the Lord. The kisses of an enemy are both deceitful and dangerous, though it seems so ungracious to refuse the offered help of professed friends.
In verse 3 the exiles turned the offer down. Rossier asks what such helpers could bring to the house of God.
These people came from an idolatrous mixture. They offer to build together with the people, but what materials could they bring to the house of God?… Do God's people today understand that His work cannot allow any mixture with the world in those He entrusts with it?… In speaking this way, the remnant show no spiritual pride. They admit that they are under the king of the Gentiles because they had been unfaithful. But they have understood that they alone are called to this work.
Once turned down, the same men dropped the mask. Rossier names the two forms the enemy takes.
The enemy had presented himself as a friend. This called for special watchfulness and caution. But once refused, these men soon show their true character openly… The people had been firm. They had resisted the tricks and cunning that belong to the ancient serpent. But they become frightened when the adversary appears as a roaring lion. They forget that their enemy is a defeated enemy, and that he would have fled from anyone who stood up to him.
Mackintosh gives the ground for such a refusal, and the names it earns.
A child of God should refuse to be yoked with an unbeliever. This holds at home, in business, or in religion. He refuses simply because God tells him to be separate, and not because of his own personal holiness… People will call it intolerance, bigotry, narrow-mindedness, exclusiveness, and the like. But we cannot help all this… No doubt the remnant in the days of Ezra must have looked very intolerant when they refused the help of the surrounding people in building the house of God. But they acted on a divine principle in that refusal.
- Foundation — work for God draws opposition as soon as it starts. The foundation went down, and the adversaries appeared.
- Flattery — the first attack came as an offer to help. An enemy is far more dangerous as a friend than as a foe.
- Fingerprints — their own words gave them away. They feared the LORD and served their idols at the same time.
- Firmness — the refusal was obedience, not pride. God's people stay separate because God says so, not because they are better.
- Force — flattery refused turns into open attack. They stood up to the serpent, then feared the lion — forgetting he was already beaten.
and they came to Zerubbabel and to the chief fathers, and said to them, We would build with you; for we seek your God, as ye; and we have sacrificed to him since the days of Esar-haddon king of Assyria, who brought us up hither.
The builders had just laid the foundation of the temple. Then neighbours arrived with a warm religious offer: they worshipped the same God, and had been sacrificing to Him for generations. Scripture has already told us who these men are. So why was such a reasonable offer refused?
Verse 1 calls these men adversaries. Verse 2 puts friendly words in their mouths. One writer traces the refusal back to grace, not to suspicion:
They argued for their claim by saying that they called on God as the Jews did. They had also sacrificed to Him since Esarhaddon brought them into the land. This was not enmity. Why turn away such a desire? The Spirit of God calls them the adversaries of Judah and Benjamin. The people of God — the assembly of God — should know their own special privileges. They should know that they are the assembly of the Lord. The Lord loved Judah and Benjamin. All the blessing they received flowed from His grace towards them. They were bound to recognise that grace fully. Not to recognise it was to despise it.
Their claim to seek the same God sounds unanswerable. But the next clause dates their worship from the day a foreign king moved them into the land:
However, their next phrase gives them away: "and we have been sacrificing to Him ever since the days of Esarhaddon king of Assyria who brought us here." A comparison with 2 Kings 17 will show what had happened. Assyria had deported the ten tribes, and its king repopulated the land of Samaria with people from Assyria. But God sent lions who killed some of these people. So the king took advice. He sent them a priest to teach them Jewish ways, hoping to appease the God of Israel. The result was a strange mixture of the worship God had established and idolatry.
That blend of true and false worship is not a curiosity of ancient history. One writer sees the same pattern wherever religion keeps God's name while keeping the world too:
You could not call this mixture pure idolatry. It makes us think of the blend people call Christendom, in whatever form it appears... where the worship of the true God stands side by side with the moral darkness of the world, and where what people claim to be has no connection with what ought to mark out the people of God.
One writer pictures how the offer must have looked to the builders:
How kind it seemed! How fair! Now at least, instead of the old antagonism, their neighbours were going to be so friendly — to help them build, and to worship and serve the same Lord as they did!
The refusal showed what the offer really was. The friendly neighbours turned into open opponents, and the builders who stood up to the flattery gave way to the threats:
The enemy had presented himself as a friend; this called for special watchfulness and caution. But these men, once rejected, very soon show their true character openly: "Then the people of the land discouraged the people of Judah and made them afraid to build and bribed counselors against them to frustrate their purpose." The people had been firm. They had resisted the tricks and cunning of the ancient serpent. But they become frightened when the adversary appears as a roaring lion.
Zerubbabel and Jeshua answered by pointing to Cyrus's command. One writer asks why a foreign king had to be mentioned at all:
No doubt it was a state of weakness, a state of humiliation — for why mention king Cyrus? What had he to do with it? What a strange position, that he should be commanding Israel! But so it was... They owed their protection and whatever good government they enjoyed to the powers of that day. Even so, they held strictly to the word of God about the special place of Israel... Never was there a deeper sense in Israel of Israel's special place than when they were this low and feeble.
One writer brings the same refusal into the work of God today:
To this day, the people of God must do the work of God. If the world offers cooperation we have to refuse. If we do, then those who made the offer will soon show their true colours. But if we don't, we will soon spoil the work. The world's principles end up ruling the work we wanted to do for God.
- Named first. Scripture calls the speakers adversaries before they open their mouths. The verdict comes from God, not from the builders' instincts.
- Betrayed by their own sentence. Their own words tied their worship to the day a foreign king moved them in. Their religion mixed true worship with idolatry.
- Kindness as the weapon. The offer looked like the end of old hostility and the arrival of help. The enemy had come dressed as a friend.
- Refusal unmasks. Once refused, the friends became open opponents. They discouraged, frightened and bribed. The builders stood up to the tricks, but not to the threats.
- Weakness is no excuse. Humbled under a foreign king, they still held the special place God's grace had given them. The work of God still belongs to the people of God.
But Zerubbabel and Jeshua and the rest of the chief fathers of Israel said to them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build a house to our God, but we alone will build to Jehovah the God of Israel, as king Cyrus, the king of Persia, has commanded us.
Work on God's house in Jerusalem had only just begun. Neighbours offered to help, and the leaders of the returned exiles said no. How can it be right to turn away people who say they seek the same God? What gave Zerubbabel and Jeshua the right to say we alone?
The offer sounded reasonable. Nothing in it looked hostile. One writer asks that same question, then answers it from the name Scripture gives these men:
They claimed that they called on God as the Jews did. They said they had sacrificed to Him ever since Esarhaddon brought them into the land. This was not open hostility. Why turn such a desire away? The Spirit of God calls them the adversaries of Judah and Benjamin. The people of God — the assembly of God — ought to know their own distinct privileges. They ought to know that they are the assembly of the Lord.
Their claim was meant to prove they were kin. It proved the opposite.
They say, "We have been sacrificing to Him ever since the days of Esarhaddon king of Assyria who brought us here." In this way they revealed their true origin. By their own confession they were not the children of Abraham but Assyrians. So they had no claim to be of the children of Israel. These were in fact the fathers of the Samaritans (see 2 Kings 17:24-41), who kept trying to force their way into the place of privilege and blessing. That, and the strife it caused, is why the Jews had no dealings with the Samaritans. We can learn from this incident where one of the gravest dangers in the Lord's work comes from. The kisses of an enemy are both deceitful and dangerous. Yet it seems so ungracious to refuse help offered by people who claim to be friends.
Refusing a friendly offer takes judgment. An earlier generation had failed this test. The Gibeonites tricked Joshua by dressing as travellers from far away.
We must take care how we judge, but we still have to judge. We have to test everything and hold fast what is good; and so they did on this occasion. Zerubbabel and Jeshua were not deceived in these later days. Joshua and the princes were taken in on a similar occasion long before, when the Gibeonites came up disguised as travellers.
The answer sounds narrow. Commentators agree that it was, and say the narrowness was right.
Some may think these leaders of the people were taking a narrow and exclusive position. In fact they were. But in doing so they had the Lord's mind. They were resting on a divine principle that still holds: only the Lord's people can do the work of His house. Others may call themselves builders and claim they want to help His work forward. But they can only build with wood, hay, or straw… No difficulty, no shortage, no circumstances whatever can justify an alliance between the Church and the world. Nothing can justify taking the world's favour or help in the holy work of the Lord.
Another writer names what accepting the offer would have denied:
To admit strangers would have been to deny that He was their God, the God of Israel.
The same answer that shuts the door admits a foreign king is giving the orders. That keeps the refusal from being pride.
In speaking this way they show no spiritual pride. They admit that they are subject to the king of the Gentiles, and that this is the result of their own unfaithfulness. But they have understood that they alone are called to this work. They cannot in any way associate with the religious character of the people around them.
Another writer weighs their appeal to the king's decree:
It was not a question of friendly feeling or of broad sentiment, but of God and His will. It may have been shrewd to plead the command of Cyrus the Persian. But God's people are strongest when in their weakness they stand only on the word of God.
Verses 4 and 5 show what the offer had been hiding all along.
They failed to corrupt the work the returned exiles were doing. So now they throw off the mask of friendship and try to hinder them by open hostility. This is Satan's method in every age. He and his servants will often disguise themselves as angels of light and ministers of righteousness. They do this because it is easier to deceive the saints than to frighten them. But the moment someone detects and exposes his presence and activity, his rage knows no limit.
- Named — the Spirit calls these volunteers adversaries of Judah and Benjamin, though their offer sounded friendly.
- Exposed — their own words about Esarhaddon proved they were Assyrians, with no claim to be children of Israel.
- Discerned — Zerubbabel and Jeshua tested the offer. They were not deceived, as Joshua had been by the Gibeonites.
- Refused — only the Lord's people can build the Lord's house. No difficulty can justify taking the world's help in His work.
- Unmasked — once refused, the would-be helpers dropped the mask and fought the building in the open.
And the people of the land weakened the hands of the people of Judah, and troubled them in building;
The returned exiles had just begun rebuilding the temple when they refused an offer of help from the surrounding peoples. That refusal turned neighbours into open enemies, and it raises the question this chapter answers: what really stopped the work of God — the enemy outside, or something inside the builders?
The friendly offer earlier in the chapter and the hostility here are two stages of one campaign. Dennett sees the attack as proof of what the offer really was:
They had failed to corrupt the work the returned exiles were doing. So now they throw off the mask of friendship and try to hinder it by open hostility. This is Satan's method in every age. He and his servants will often transform themselves into angels of light and ministers of righteousness. They do this because it is easier to deceive the saints than to scare them off. But the moment someone detects and exposes his presence and activity, his rage knows no bounds.
Rossier names the two forms the enemy takes, and what the builders forgot:
The people had stood firm and resisted the tricks and cunning that belong to the ancient serpent. But they become frightened when the adversary appears as a roaring lion. They forget that their enemy is a defeated enemy, and that he would have fled from anyone who stood up to him.
Where the ESV says the people of the land "discouraged" Judah, older translations read that they "weakened the hands" of Judah — the wording these writers use. The opponents were not idol-worshippers from a foreign religion. Kelly notes how respectable they looked, and why that made no difference:
Then the people of the land weakened their hands. Now they showed what they really were — not friends, but adversaries. And notice: they were adversaries even though they worshipped the Lord God of Israel. They were adversaries even though they were not idolaters, as far as we know at this time. The text does not accuse them of that, but they were not Israel. That was enough.
Hardt draws the same line for the work of God today:
To this day, the work of God must be done by the people of God. If the world offers to co-operate, we have to refuse. If we do, those who made the offer will soon show their true colours. But if we don't, we will soon spoil the work. We end up being governed by the world's principles in the work we wanted to do for God.
A royal ban did come, but only much later and under a different king. Darby shows that the ban was not what stopped the work:
There were adversaries in the land who made them afraid, and so prevented their building. It seems the Jews did not dare to continue... But the first thing was that the adversaries weakened the hands of the people. The ban only came two reigns later, but the Jews had already stopped building through fear of their adversaries... God was no more to be feared under Darius than under Cyrus or Artaxerxes. Their weakness came from having forgotten God.
Kelly presses the point into a rule about God's people in any age:
God does not attribute the stopping of the work to the command of the king, although the king did give in at last... It was lack of faith, and not the king's authority, that stopped the work; and, dear friends, as a rule, is it not always so? When blessing stops among God's people, it is really never the work of the enemy outside. It is lack of faith, and therefore of faithfulness, within.
Dennett traces the slide from fear to self-interest:
Fear of their adversaries was stronger than their faith in God. So they lost heart, thought only of themselves and their own selfish interests, and began to build their own houses and to say, "The time has not yet come to rebuild the house of the LORD."
Patterson shows what restarted the work: two prophets, and one fear replacing another:
Fear of man stopped the work of the Lord. The energy and beauty of their first efforts of faith were gone. God sends the prophets Haggai and Zechariah to stir up the people to the work of the Lord... Once stirred up, we find that they obeyed the voice of the Lord and did the work of the Lord. The fear of man gave place to the fear of the Lord; and God was there to accept and bless the renewed efforts of faith.
- Mask — the offer of help and the attack came from the same source. Refusal only exposed what was already there.
- Measure — these opponents worshipped the God of Israel and were still adversaries. The test was not their religion but whether they belonged to God's people.
- Method — cunning first, then open terror. The builders resisted the trick and gave way to the threat.
- Motive — the enemy weakened their hands before any law forbade the work; fear, not force, was the true hindrance.
- Mercy — God did not leave them there: two prophets replaced the fear of man with the fear of the Lord, and the work went on.
and they hired counsellors against them, to frustrate their purpose, all the days of Cyrus king of Persia, even until the reign of Darius king of Persia.
Ezra 4:5 shows how long the trouble lasted. Judah refused the neighbours' offer of help, so they hired officials to block the work — but why did the king's decree not protect it?
Watch what happens the moment that offer is refused.
The effect of the refusal shows the true nature of the offer these adversaries of Judah and Benjamin had made... They had failed to corrupt the work that the people back from captivity were doing. So they now throw off the mask of friendship and try to hinder them by open hostility. Such is Satan's method in every age. He and his servants will often transform themselves into angels of light and ministers of righteousness. It is easier to deceive the saints than to frighten them off. But the moment someone detects and exposes his presence and activity, his rage knows no limits.
These hired counsellors were not local troublemakers. They worked inside the Persian court itself.
Adversaries in the land made them afraid, and so kept them from building. It appears that the Jews did not dare continue. Their adversaries hired counsellors in the Persian court to frustrate the purpose of the Jews. But the first thing was that the adversaries weakened the hands of the people. They did not get the official ban until two reigns later.
The verse spans reigns, not months.
The opposition was very persistent, for verses 5-7 name no fewer than four kings. It began at once in the days of Cyrus and continued until the time of Darius, as verse 5 states. Secular history knows this Darius as the one surnamed Hystaspes. In between these kings came Ahasuerus, not the one mentioned in the book of Esther, but the one known as Cambyses.
Verse 5 is not one step in a sequence. It is a summary, and the chapter picks up its thread again at the end.
These two verses (4 and 5) sum up what the enemies of Israel did during the reigns of Cyrus, Ahasuerus, and Artaxerxes. Verse 24 therefore connects back to verse 5. The passage in between is a parenthesis, giving an account of how the adversaries of Judah and Benjamin succeeded in their plans.
The ban came later. The people had already quit.
Mark this — it is a very important thing. God does not blame the stopping of the work on the king's command. The king did give in at last, and he did yield to their persistent begging to stop the Israelites. But the Israelites began to stop before the king's order came. It was want of faith, and not the king's authority, that stopped the work. And, dear friends, as a rule, is it not always so? The stopping of blessing among God's people is really never the work of the enemy outside. It is want of faith, and so of faithfulness, within.
The enemy had changed tactics, and the people lost their nerve.
The people had been firm and had resisted the tricks and cunning that mark the ancient serpent. But they become frightened when the adversary appears as a roaring lion. They forget that their enemy is a defeated enemy, and that he would have left anyone who stood up to him.
The verse ends in deadlock, but the book does not.
But God is faithful, even when His people so often are not; and He works in His people to recover them by His word. Their circumstances depressed them and their adversaries discouraged them. They slackened the work before their enemies even got a decree to stop them. But God in the resources of His grace raised up servants of His even at that time of weakness to recall them to His will. And hearts were not lacking among the chiefs to respond.
- Refusal. Judah turned down the offer of partnership, and the hidden hostility came into the open. The friendly approach had been a disguise.
- Reprisal. They paid for counsellors inside the Persian court, so the pressure kept up from Cyrus to Darius.
- Retreat. The building stopped before any royal ban arrived. The people gave in to fear of an enemy already defeated.
- Reason. The blame lies inside, not outside. Loss of blessing comes from want of faith among God's people, not from the power of their enemies.
- Recovery. Verse 5 is a summary, and its thread resumes at verse 24. The deadlock breaks when God's word stirs His people back to the work.
And in the reign of Ahasuerus, in the beginning of his reign, they wrote an accusation against the inhabitants of Judah and Jerusalem.
In Ezra 4:6 the enemies of the returned exiles stop offering help. They write to the king instead. Who was this Ahasuerus? Why does the story jump ahead here? And what came of the charge they laid?
This verse begins a section that steps outside the main story. Verse 5 says the opposition ran from Cyrus until Darius. Verses 6 to 23 fill in the years between.
The opposition extended from the days of Cyrus until the reign of Darius, Ezra 4:5. Two kings came between Cyrus and Darius. Ahasuerus (Cambyses) succeeded Cyrus. A letter was written to him (Ezra 4:6), but no answer is recorded. Another was sent to Artaxerxes (Pseudo-Smerdis), and both the letter and the reply are recorded... Ezra 4:6-23 are a parenthesis.
The name is easy to confuse with the king in the book of Esther. One writer separates the two, and weighs what the letter achieved.
In between these kings came Ahasuerus, not the one mentioned in the book of Esther, but the one known as Cambyses. During his reign the opponents were very active. They wrote up an accusation against the Jews in Jerusalem, but apparently without any definite effect.
Commentators differ. Another writer names different kings, and admits the question is hard:
This is hardly the place to discuss the question of who Ahasuerus and Artaxerxes were. There is great difficulty in identifying them now with the monarchs of secular history. Probably the first was Xerxes, and the second Artaxerxes Longimanus.
The word translated "accusation" is used elsewhere as a name. One dictionary traces it.
This was the name given to a well dug by Isaac's servants, because the servants of Abimelech seized it. Genesis 26:21. Fürst says it means 'strife'; Gesenius says 'contention'. In Ezra 4:6, where the same word appears as a common noun, it is 'accusation'.
Earlier in the chapter these same people had asked to share in the building. One dictionary contrasts their name for themselves with God's name for them.
Some asked to share in the building. They called themselves 'worshippers,' but God called them 'adversaries.' The leaders refused their help, and that stirred up their hatred and hostility.
Once they were refused, their manner changed.
The enemy had presented himself as a friend. That called for special watchfulness and caution. But these men, who were rejected, very soon show their true character quite openly... The people had been firm and had resisted the tricks and cunning of the ancient serpent. But they become frightened when the adversary appears as a roaring lion. They forget that their enemy is a defeated enemy, and that he would have left anyone who stood up to him.
The letter of verse 6 was not the only weapon. One writer counts four, and names the one thing that could have held them off.
And so, these four hostile forces unite here to ruin the work of God: trickery, intimidation, accusation, and violence. Only faith could have resisted them. But the people had no faith at all. As a result, the building of the house stopped for fifteen years.
Later in the chapter a king does finally forbid the building. But the text is careful about cause and effect, and the distinction it draws is uncomfortable.
But mark this — and it is very important. God does not blame the king's command for the stopping of the work. The king did give in at last, and did yield to their persistent begging. But the Israelites had begun to stop before the king's order came. It was lack of faith, and not the king's authority, that stopped the work. And, dear friends, as a rule, is it not always so? The stopping of blessing among God's people is really never the work of the enemy outside. It is lack of faith, and so of faithfulness, within.
The same choice comes up today. One writer puts the rule plainly.
Until today, the work of God must be done by the people of God. If the world offers co-operation we have to refuse. If we do, then those who made the offer will soon show their true colours. But if we don't we will soon spoil the work. We end up being governed by the world's principles in the work we wanted to do for God.
- Refusal — the accusation of verse 6 follows the rejected offer of help. Refuse the world's partnership, and expect hostility next.
- Contention — the word for "accusation" means strife. It also names a well that was seized from Isaac.
- Escalation — trickery, intimidation, accusation and violence joined forces against the work. Only faith could have held them off.
- Parenthesis — verses 6 to 23 step out of order. They cover the kings between Cyrus and Darius, and this first letter drew no recorded reply.
- Cause — the king's order was not what stopped the building. Faith failed inside first, and blessing is never really lost to the enemy outside.
And in the days of Artaxerxes, Bishlam, Mithredath, Tabeel, and the rest of his companions, wrote to Artaxerxes king of Persia; and the writing of the letter was written in Aramaic, and interpreted in Aramaic.
Work on God's house had already stalled. Now the opponents of the returned exiles change tactics. Instead of local pressure, they send a formal letter to the Persian king. This verse names the senders and the language they used. Who were these men? Which king did they write to? And why does the language matter?
This verse opens a longer record of a new method: letters aimed at the throne.
From verses 6–23 we have the details of how the adversaries of God's people secured a royal decree. It was in their favour, and against the building of the temple. Their effort in the reign of Ahasuerus seems to have failed (v. 6). But they were not discouraged. They kept at their object in the reign of his successor, Artaxerxes, and then their efforts were rewarded.
The verse names three senders. One writer fills in their background, and also explains the royal names used in this chapter.
Bishlam, Mithredath and Tabeel wrote a letter to King Artaxerxes. They were Persians and officials of the government, probably closely connected with the Samaritans and living in Jerusalem. (Ahasuerus is a royal title meaning "the venerable king." Artaxerxes is also such a title, meaning "the great king.")
They did not write alone. The verse mentions "the rest of their associates," and the next verses list who they were.
The opposition had not weakened with the passing of time or because of the earlier failure. In fact it had increased, as is clear if we read verses 7–9. The letter went up in the names of certain men who were prominent among the people of the land. Behind it stood no less than nine of the tribes or peoples then living in the country around Palestine. It was clearly a very impressive document.
Aramaic was the working language of the Persian Empire. Parts of the book of Ezra are written in it rather than in Hebrew.
The verses of chapters 4:18–6:18 and 7:12–26 are not written in Hebrew but in Aramaic. Aramaic is a Semitic language, as is Hebrew. Aramaic was an official and an international trade language in the Persian Empire. The paragraphs mentioned above contain official documents written by or for the Persian court.
Commentators differ on the identity of the kings in this chapter. One is frank about the difficulty.
This is hardly the place to discuss the question of who Ahasuerus and Artaxerxes were. It is very hard now to identify them with the kings of secular history. Probably the first was Xerxes, and the second Artaxerxes Longimanus.
A reference work matches these names to different kings, and treats this section as a break in the flow of the story.
Ahasuerus (Cambyses) succeeded Cyrus. A letter went to him (Ezra 4:6), but no answer is recorded. Another went to Artaxerxes (Pseudo-Smerdis), and both that letter and the reply are recorded. … Ezra 4:6–23 are a parenthesis.
The building work under way was the temple. The letter that follows says nothing about it, and that silence had a reason.
These "adversaries of Judah and Benjamin" had claimed a desire to help in building the temple, on the ground that they too sacrificed to the God of Israel. Yet in their accusation they leave out any reference to the temple, and speak only of the city. Their reason was obvious. The proclamation of Cyrus concerned the temple. So by accusing the Jews of building the city, they made their hints of rebellion and treason look plausible. The king's answer shows they had not miscalculated.
What they did claim was not true.
The letter is a very cleverly crafted document, full of misrepresentation and falsehood. They accused the Jews of building Jerusalem and setting up the wall. This was false, because only the house was being built, not the wall or the city. What they said about the city, its past record of rebellion, was true, and the accuser made use of the nation's past sins.
The letter is one stage in a longer campaign. One writer names the four weapons used, and what they cost.
And so, these four hostile forces unite here to ruin the work of God: trickery, intimidation, accusation, and violence. Only faith could have resisted them. But the people had no faith at all, and so the building of the house stopped for fifteen years.
- Persistence. The first letter, to Ahasuerus, achieved nothing. The writers tried again with the next king, and this time they succeeded.
- Prestige. Prominent men signed the letter, and nine surrounding peoples stood behind it. The document aimed to impress.
- Language. Aramaic was the official language of the Persian court, and Ezra records these court documents in it.
- Omission. The letter never mentions the temple, the one thing Cyrus had authorised. It speaks only of the city, which made a charge of rebellion sound plausible.
- Cost. Trickery, intimidation, accusation and force came one after another. The house stood unfinished for fifteen years.
Rehum the chancellor and Shimshai the scribe wrote a letter against Jerusalem to Artaxerxes the king after this sort
Ezra 4:8 names two officials — a commander and a scribe — who put their opposition to Jerusalem in writing and sent it to the Persian king. At this verse the book also changes language, so we now read the enemy's own words.
The Old Testament is a Hebrew book, with a few exceptions. This verse marks the start of one of them:
The Old Testament was written in Hebrew, except for Ezra 4:8 to Ezra 6:18; Ezra 7:12-26; Jeremiah 10:11; and Daniel 2:4 to Daniel 7:28. Those parts are in Chaldee, that is, Aramaic.
The document that follows is not a neutral report. One writer weighs its contents against the facts on the ground and names the mind behind it:
The letter is a carefully crafted document, full of misrepresentation and falsehood, inspired by the one who is "a liar and the father of lies." They accused the Jews of building Jerusalem and setting up the wall. This was false, because they were only building the house, not the wall or the city. What they said about the city — its old record of rebellion — was true, and the accuser made use of the past sins of the nation.
The letter sounds like concern for Persia. One writer tests that concern and finds a familiar pattern:
Were they really concerned about Persia? Only insofar as they could benefit through Persia. This was like the Pharisees telling Pilate about the Lord Jesus, "If you release this man, you are not Caesar's friend" (John 19:12). They had no love for Caesar, but used his name to frighten Pilate. These adversaries of Judah only wanted Artaxerxes to assume that the Jews would not pay tribute to Persia.
The accusation says nothing about the temple. One writer asks what that silence was for, and carries the answer into the present:
Notice that they do not accuse the people of rebuilding the temple. They do not say one word about it. Instead they speak of the city. Their aim is easy to discover. They wanted to stop the remnant from gathering together, because such a gathering would take away the enemy's power over the people of God... while scattered, they would easily become the prey of their adversaries. In the same way, Satan opposes the gathering of the children of God today. If he does not succeed in corrupting the sheep, he makes them quarrel, seizes them, and scatters them.
This letter was one weapon among several. One writer names them all, and counts the cost:
And so these four hostile forces come together again here to ruin the work of God: trickery, intimidation, accusation, and violence. Only faith could have resisted them. But the people had no faith at all, and so the building of the house stopped for fifteen years.
The letter of Rehum and Shimshai came years after the building had already slowed. That gap matters when we ask what stopped the work:
But many years passed before this ban came. The prophecies throw much light on the history of that time. From studying them and comparing their dates, it seems clear to me that the true hindrance was a lack of faith in the remnant... God was no more to be feared in the reign of Darius than in the reign of Cyrus or of Artaxerxes. The source of their weakness was that they had forgotten God. This shows the great grace of God in waking them up through the mouth of Haggai.
The letter succeeded. Even so, its success had a boundary it could not cross:
Yet the enemy could only delay, not frustrate, their purpose, which was of God.
- Accusation. After trickery and threats failed, the enemies wrote a formal charge. It was the third of four weapons: trickery, intimidation, accusation, violence.
- Mixture. The letter mixed lies with truth. The claim that the walls were going up was false. The city's old record of rebellion was real, and the accuser used it.
- Motive. The stated care for the king's revenue was a cover. The real aim was to keep God's people from gathering, since scattered they are easy prey.
- Cause. Commentators point past the letter to a deeper failure. The work had already stalled through lack of faith. Forgetting God, not the king's order, was the real weakness.
- Limit. The enemy could delay the work but never defeat it. After fifteen years God stirred His people again through the prophet Haggai.
Rehum the chancellor, and Shimshai the scribe, and the rest of their companions, the Dinaites, and the Apharsathchites, the Tarpelites, the Apharsites, the Archevites, the Babylonians, the Shushanchites, the Dehaites, the Elamites,
Ezra 4:9 is the signature block of a letter. Officials and resettled peoples put their names to a complaint against the rebuilding of Jerusalem, and the list raises two questions: who were these groups, and why did so many of them unite against one small band of returned exiles?
The verse names not one enemy but a bloc. What could pull peoples this different into one letter?
There are several lessons to note in the record of what they did. The first is the union of all the various races of the land "against Jerusalem"... all these were banded together to frustrate the work of the Lord in the building of His house. The carnal mind is enmity against God. So when God and His testimony are in question, there is no difficulty in securing unity of aim and purpose among His enemies. However much they differ among themselves, and even hate one another, they have but one mind when God appears on the scene.
The same writer gives a well-known example:
Even Herod and Pilate, who had been enemies before, became friends through their shared contempt of Christ.
Two officials head the list: Rehum the commander and Shimshai the scribe. Behind them stands a crowd of peoples, and the size of the list was the point.
Time and their earlier failure had not reduced the opposition. It had increased instead, as verses 7-9 make clear. The letter went up in the names of certain men who were prominent among the people of the land. Behind them stood no fewer than nine tribes or citizens or peoples who were living then in the country around Palestine. It was clearly a very imposing document.
Whether they truly spoke for all those groups is another matter.
They speak of themselves as representatives of many peoples whom Osnapper had taken captive and settled in the cities of Samaria. Whether they really represented those nations, as their letter claimed, may be very questionable. But they wanted their letter to look convincing.
The names are not native to the land. So where did these peoples come from?
They belonged to the nations that the kings of Assyria, as was their custom, moved to other countries after conquering them. Esar-haddon, the son of Sennacherib, followed the policy of Shalmaneser. The tribes of Israel that were never subdued went into captivity, and in their place he settled people from many different lands. He made them live in the cities of Samaria and in the land west of the Euphrates. The second book of Kings tells us about the religious condition of these nations. They kept their gods, and at the same time acknowledged the God of Israel: "So these nations feared the LORD and also served their carved images."
The returning exiles had refused to let these people build with them. That refusal was not pride:
In speaking this way, they show no spiritual pride. They admit that they are under the king of the Gentiles because of their own unfaithfulness. But they have understood that they alone are called to this work, since they cannot in any way associate with the religious character of the people around them.
The list names no one as the real author of the campaign. Commentators point past the signatures.
So in our chapter, Satan, though concealed, is the active agent in stirring up these various peoples in their action against the work of the remnant.
The coalition looked strong. But the real weakness lay on the other side.
It must still be stressed that these adversaries could have had no power against the people of God, if the people themselves had not lost faith in God and heart for their work... It would have been the same with the remnant, but for their own laziness and unbelief. As already pointed out, it seems they stopped their work before the ban ever came.
The outcome was settled from the start:
The enemy could only delay their purpose, not frustrate it, for it was of God.
- United — peoples who differ and even hate each other agree at once when God's work is the target.
- Impressive — two officials and nine peoples made the letter look weighty. Their claim to speak for all those nations is questionable.
- Imported — Assyrian kings had resettled these peoples in Samaria. They feared the LORD and served their own idols at the same time.
- Concealed — the letter names no real author. Behind the signatures Satan stirs up the peoples against the work.
- Limited — the enemy could delay the work but not defeat it. What really stopped it was the exiles' own loss of faith.
and the rest of the peoples whom the great and noble Osnappar brought over and settled in the cities of Samaria, and the rest [of the country] on this side the river, and so forth.
These names sign a hostile letter to the king of Persia, sent by peoples settled in Samaria and the province west of the Euphrates. Who were they, and what real force did their protest have against the small group rebuilding Jerusalem?
They were not natives of the land. The verse names Osnappar as the king who settled them there. One writer traces that practice back through earlier Assyrian kings.
They belonged to the nations that the kings of Assyria conquered and then moved to other countries, as their custom was. Esar-haddon, the son of Sennacherib, followed the policy of Shalmaneser (2 Kings 17:3). He removed the tribes of Israel that still held out, and they went into captivity. In their place he put people from many different lands, settling them in the cities of Samaria and in the land west of the Euphrates (v. 10).
Their religion matched their mixed origin. Second Kings records what they became:
The second book of Kings (2 Kings 17:33) tells us about the religious state of these nations. They kept their own gods and at the same time acknowledged the God of Israel. In the words of the Bible, "these nations feared the LORD and also served their carved images" (2 Kings 17:41).
That blend did not stay in ancient Samaria. One writer sees the same mixture in later religion that carries God's name.
This mixture was not plain idolatry, and it makes us think of the blend we call Christendom, in whatever form it appears... where worship of the true God sits alongside the moral darkness of the world, and where what people profess has no relation to what ought to mark the people of God.
So many names matter for one reason: they all pulled the same way.
The first is the union of all the different races of the land "against Jerusalem"... all of them joined forces to block the Lord's work of building His house. The mind of the flesh is hostile to God. So when God and His testimony are at stake, His enemies agree on one aim and purpose without difficulty. They may differ among themselves, and even hate one another, yet they are of one mind when God comes on the scene. We see this clearly in the case of our blessed Lord, when the kings of the earth set themselves and the rulers took counsel together against the LORD and against His Anointed (Psalm 2). Even Herod and Pilate, who had been enemies before, became friends through their shared contempt of Christ.
Behind that alliance Dennett sees a hidden hand:
So in our chapter Satan stays hidden, but he is the one stirring up these different peoples to act against the work of the remnant.
The list of names was also meant to impress.
The letter went up in the names of leading men among the people of the land. It was backed by no fewer than nine of the tribes or citizens or peoples then living in the country around them. It was clearly a very impressive document.
Whether the writers had any right to speak for all those groups is another matter.
They present themselves as representatives of many peoples whom Osnappar had taken captive and settled in the cities of Samaria (vv. 9-10). Whether they really spoke for those nations when they wrote may be very doubtful, but they wanted their letter to look convincing.
Their numbers and titles were not the real problem. The trouble had already started inside the camp.
We must still stress that these enemies could have had no power against the people of God, if the people themselves had not lost faith in God and heart for their work. Paul wrote, "A wide door for effective work has opened to me, and there are many adversaries" (1 Cor. 16:9). Yet not one of his opponents could have hindered his work, because he was counting on Him who "opens, and no one will shut."
- Origin — Assyrian kings moved these peoples into the cities of Samaria and the land west of the Euphrates. They took Israel away and put foreigners in their place.
- Mixture — They feared the God of Israel and served their carved images too. One writer sees the same blend wherever true worship sits beside the world's moral darkness.
- Coalition — Peoples who hated each other agreed at once when God's house went up. The same union of enemies met again at the cross.
- Presentation — Nine peoples and leading names made the letter look impressive. Whether the writers really spoke for them all is doubtful.
- Weakness — No alliance could stop the work while the builders trusted God. Opposition wins only where faith and heart are already lost.
This is the copy of the letter that they sent to him To Artaxerxes the king Thy servants the men on this side the river, and so forth.
This verse opens a letter that enemies of God's people sent to King Artaxerxes, signed as if by loyal servants. So why does Scripture keep an enemy's letter on record, and what does the polite greeting hide?
Verses 11 to 16 give the document itself. One writer explains why it stands in the Bible at all.
Verses 11-16 give us a copy of this letter. We are meant to see how skilful the adversary is at mixing lies with facts. That is how he twists a case and misrepresents it.
The letter goes to Artaxerxes. One writer explains who this king was, and why the enemies thought he would listen.
Then came the Artaxerxes of verse 7. Writers outside Scripture identify him as Smerdis, a man who seized the throne and held power for only a very short time. Because he had seized power, he was of course ready to overturn and cancel the decrees of the kings before him. In that way he hoped to secure his own position, if he could. The opponents saw that this man gave them an excellent chance with their petition, so once more they sent up a letter.
They sign themselves the king's servants. One writer asks how real that loyalty was.
They write confidently to the effect that if the city were rebuilt, its people would not pay tax, tribute or customs duty to Persia. Were they really concerned about Persia? Only so far as they could benefit through Persia. This was like the Pharisees telling Pilate about the Lord Jesus, "If you release this man, you are not Caesar's friend." They had no love for Caesar, but used his name to frighten Pilate.
The charge that follows is about a city and its walls. The temple is never mentioned, though that was the one building Cyrus had authorised.
This statement gives away the voice of the "accuser of the brothers." It was false, and so it came from Satan, for "when he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies." They had not set up the walls of the city or joined its foundations at all. They had barely laid the foundation of the temple... Their reason was obvious. The proclamation of Cyrus concerned the temple. So by accusing the Jews of building the city, they made their hints of rebellion and treason look believable. The king's answer shows they had judged it right.
The charge of rebellion was not invented out of nothing. Judah's last king had once broken a sworn promise to Babylon.
The sin of Israel in the past bears bitter fruit for these children of the captivity. Their last king, Zedekiah, had "sworn by God" to be faithful to Nebuchadnezzar, but he broke his oath and rebelled against the king of Babylon. So there was truth in the accusation that Jerusalem had been a rebellious city... Under God's government in this world they now suffered the consequence of their fathers' sins.
Behind the talk of lost revenue lay a simpler aim. Scattered people are easy prey.
Notice that they never accuse the people of rebuilding the temple. They do not say one word about it. Instead they speak of the city. Their aim is easy to discover. They wanted to stop the remnant from gathering together. Such a gathering would take away the enemy's power over the people of God... Scattered, they would easily become the prey of their enemies. In the same way Satan opposes the gathering of the children of God today. If he cannot corrupt the sheep, he sets them quarrelling, seizes them, and scatters them.
The letter succeeded, and the building stopped. But one writer is careful about where he places the blame.
All this took place, and their showy opposition did take effect. It troubled the Israelites, and they stopped the work. But note this, and it is very important. God does not blame the stopping of the work on the king's command. The king did give in at last, and yielded to their constant pressure to stop the Israelites. Yet the Israelites began to stop before the king's order came. It was lack of faith, not the king's authority, that stopped the work; and, dear friends, as a rule, is it not always so? The failure of blessing among God's people is never the work of the enemy outside. It comes from the lack of faith, and so of faithfulness, within.
- Copy. God kept the enemy's own letter on record. His people can study how an adversary mixes lies with facts.
- Pose. It opens in the language of loyal servants, but the loyalty is a pose. These men used the king's name as a lever; they never loved him.
- Omission. The one subject missing is the temple. Call the place a rebellious city instead, and the charge sounds believable to a king — the more so because Jerusalem had rebelled before.
- Aim. Stopping the walls was a way to stop a people from gathering. Scattered sheep become easy prey.
- Cause. The letter stopped the work only because unbelief had already stopped it. The loss came from lack of faith inside, not from power outside.
Be it known to the king that the Jews who came up from thee unto us have come to Jerusalem; they are building the rebellious and the bad city, and they complete the walls and join up the foundations.
This verse opens a letter from the neighbours of the returned exiles to the Persian king. It reports building work in Jerusalem that was not happening, and it says nothing about the temple the exiles had come back to build.
The report of finished walls describes work the exiles had never done. One writer traces the lie back to its source:
This statement betrays the speech of the "accuser of the brethren." It was false, and so it came from Satan, for "when he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies." They had not set up the walls of the city or joined its foundations at all. They had barely laid the foundation of the temple.
The letter is not pure invention. Another writer says the copy was recorded so we could see how it was done:
Verses 11-16 give us a copy of this letter. In it we see how skilfully the adversary can mix lies with facts, and so twist and misrepresent the case in question.
What the verse leaves out matters as much as what it says. These men had once offered to help build the house of God. Now they write about the city and never mention the temple:
These "adversaries of Judah and Benjamin" had claimed they wanted to help build the temple, since they also sacrificed to the God of Israel. Yet their accusation leaves out the temple and speaks only of the city. Their reason was obvious. The proclamation of Cyrus was about the temple. So by accusing the Jews of building the city, they made the charges of rebellion and treason they were hinting at look plausible.
There was a deeper motive. A finished city would gather a scattered people into one place:
They wished to stop the remnant from gathering together. Such a gathering would take away the enemy's power over the people of God: "If this city is built and its walls are completed, by this means you will have no portion on this side of the river." Scattered, they would easily become the prey of their adversaries. In the same way Satan opposes the gathering of the children of God today. If he doesn't succeed in corrupting the sheep, he makes them fall out, seizes them, and scatters them.
The words "rebellious and wicked city" had history behind them. That is what gave the letter its force, and writers point to Jerusalem's last kings:
It was true that the last few kings, and Zedekiah above all, had been bad men who could not be trusted. They broke their word in a rebellious spirit, and this gave some support to their accusation. But God had chosen this city from the first, and for a brief time it held dominion from Him. The bad behaviour of the last kings who reigned there gave them their chance to blacken the whole history of Jerusalem. It is a striking example of how unfaithful servants can dishonour the whole of God's work, and give the adversary the opportunity he wants.
Another writer names the broken oath behind the charge:
Their last king, Zedekiah, had "sworn by God" to be faithful to Nebuchadnezzar, but he broke his oath and rebelled against the king of Babylon. So he brought about the destruction of Jerusalem and God's judgment on himself. There was truth, then, in the accusation that Jerusalem had been a rebellious city. The remnant were under the favour and protection of God, yet they now suffered, under His government in this world, the consequence of the sins of their fathers.
The letter also plays on the king's own interests. One writer finds the same tactic used later against Jesus:
This was like the Pharisees telling Pilate about the Lord Jesus, "If you release this man, you are not Caesar's friend" (John 19:12). They had no love for Caesar, but used his name to frighten Pilate. But these adversaries of Judah only wanted Artaxerxes to suppose that the Jews would not pay tribute to Persia.
The letter worked and the work stopped. But one writer puts the real weakness somewhere else:
We must still stress one thing. These adversaries could have had no power against the people of God, if the people themselves had not lost faith in God and heart for their work.
Yet the enemy's success was not the end of the story:
No one discovered the falsehood that they were building the city and the wall. The enemy was successful. Yet a faithful God watched over it all.
- Lie — The report of finished walls and repaired foundations was false. The exiles had barely laid the temple's foundation.
- Mix — The letter blended lies with real history, so the true parts carried the false ones.
- Silence — The letter never names the temple. That way it stepped around Cyrus's decree and turned a building project into a case of treason.
- Scatter — Walls meant a people gathered, which is what the enemy most wanted to prevent, then and now.
- Watched — Past sin made part of the charge true, and the work stopped. Yet the real hindrance was the people's loss of heart, not the enemy's skill. God watched over it all.
Be it known therefore unto the king, that, if this city be built and the walls be completed, they will not pay tribute, tax, and toll, and in the end it will bring damage to the kings.
The enemies of the returned exiles wanted the building stopped, so they wrote to the Persian king. Their strongest argument was money: rebuild this city, and your tax income disappears.
The writers say nothing about God or the temple. One commentator asks how real their concern for Persia was:
They state firmly that if the city was rebuilt, its people would not pay tax, tribute or custom to Persia (v. 13). Were they really concerned about Persia? Only so far as they could gain through Persia. It was like the Pharisees telling Pilate about the Lord Jesus, "If you release this man, you are not Caesar's friend" (Jn. 19:12). They had no love for Caesar, but used his name to frighten Pilate.
The letter is not pure invention. Jerusalem really had been a rebellious city. What makes it dangerous is the mix: fact joined to lie, and both aimed at the king's fears:
The letter is a cleverly made document. It is full of false claims and lies, inspired by the one who is "the liar, and the father of it." They accused the Jews of building Jerusalem and setting up the wall. That was a lie. The Jews were building only the house of God, not the wall or the city. What they said about the city was true: it had rebelled in the past. The accuser used the nation's old sins. But God had shown grace to His people again and brought them back from captivity. They reminded the king of the danger if the city was rebuilt and fortified with a wall, and of the loss of revenue. So they put fear in his heart.
These same men had earlier offered to help build the temple. Yet in their letter the temple never appears, only the city. Commentators give two reasons for the switch. One sees a legal calculation:
Cyrus's proclamation was about the temple. So by accusing the Jews of building the city, they made their hinted charges of rebellion and treason look believable. The king's answer shows they had judged it right.
Another sees a deeper aim: keeping the returned people, the remnant, from coming together:
They wanted to stop the remnant from gathering together. Such a gathering would take away the enemy's power over the people of God. Scattered, they would easily become the prey of their enemies.
Why could such a charge be made to stick at all? Because it had a history behind it. Zedekiah, Judah's last king, had sworn loyalty to Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, and then broken his word. Yet the same writer insists the letter was never the real problem:
So there was truth in the accusation that Jerusalem had been a rebellious city. The remnant themselves were under God's favour and protection. No one could harm them as long as they went forward trusting Him. Yet under His government in this world they were now suffering the consequence of the sins of their fathers. And it must still be stressed that these enemies could have had no power against the people of God, if the people themselves had not lost faith in God and heart for their work.
The king searched his records, found what he was told he would find, and issued the order. The two arguments that carried the day are exactly the two this verse contains — future trouble, and lost income:
Two motives were pressed on the king: guarding against future danger, and the possible loss of revenue. The royal records confirmed what the letter said about the city's past. So the king wrote, "Therefore make a decree that these men be made to cease, and that this city be not rebuilt, until a decree is made by me. And take care not to be slack in this matter. Why should damage grow to the hurt of the king?" The adversaries succeeded. When they received the letter, they went up in haste, armed with royal authority, and made sure that no attempt to continue building the house of the Lord could succeed. They stopped them by force and power.
- Silence: The letter never mentions the temple. Cyrus's decree covered the temple, so the writers spoke only of the city.
- Accusation: The charge mixes a real fact — Jerusalem's past rebellion — with a lie: that the walls were going up. Commentators trace this method to the accuser, "the liar, and the father of it."
- Money: Verse 13 moves the argument onto ground the king cares about — tribute, custom and toll. The writers had no love for Persia; they used Persia's interests to get their own way.
- Result: The king searched his records, found the city's old rebellion confirmed, and ordered the work stopped.
- Cause: The real weakness was inside. Commentators agree the enemy "could have had no power… if the people themselves had not lost faith in God and heart for their work."
Now, since we eat the salt of the palace, and it is not right for us to see the king's injury, therefore have we sent and informed the king;
The writers of this letter to King Artaxerxes pause to explain why they are writing at all. They eat the king's salt, so they say his honour is their business — but is that loyalty real, and why did the claim work so well?
Eating someone's salt was a set expression. A dictionary of Bible terms explains where it comes from:
The Persians and Hindus use the phrase to "eat the salt" of their masters to mean that their employers feed them. We find this idea in Ezra 4:14, where the opponents of the Jews say, "We eat the salt of the palace," as the passage is more literally translated.
So the claim is about dependence. They live on the king's pay, so they claim they must speak.
Did they care about the king at all? One commentator asks that, and points to the same move elsewhere in Scripture:
Were they really concerned about Persia? Only insofar as they could benefit through Persia. This was like the Pharisees telling Pilate concerning the Lord Jesus, "If you release this man, you are not Caesar's friend" (John 19:12). They had no love for Caesar, but used his name to frighten Pilate... They suggest a mere pleasing platitude to the king when they wrote that it was not proper for them to see the king's dishonour (v. 14).
They wrote as if they had nothing to gain. One writer sees skill in that:
A third thing that strikes us is the way they presented the matter. They wrote as if their whole concern was for the king's advantage and reputation, and they themselves had little interest in it. Artaxerxes, we understand, was a usurper, so he would be quick to fear anything that might challenge his authority. The great spiritual adversary, who lay behind these human adversaries, is not lacking in skill!
The letter is not a pack of lies from start to finish. Its power lies in the blend:
The letter is a very cunning document, full of misrepresentation and falsehood. It was inspired by him who is "the liar, and the father of lies." They accused the Jews of building Jerusalem and setting up the wall. This was a falsehood. They were only building the house, not the wall or the city. What they said about the city, its former character of rebellion, was true, and the accuser made use of the past sins of the nation. But God had again been gracious to His people and turned their captivity. They reminded the king of the danger if the city were built again and fortified with a wall, and of the loss of revenue, and so they put fear into the king's heart.
The true part of the charge reached back to Judah's last kings:
It was true that the last few kings, and Zedekiah above all, had been bad men and unreliable. They broke their word in a rebellious spirit, and this gave some support to the accusation. Yet God Himself had chosen the city, and for a brief time it held dominion from Him. The bad behaviour of the last kings who reigned there gave them their chance to smear the whole history of Jerusalem. It is a striking example of how unfaithful servants can dishonour the whole of God's work, and give the adversary the opening he wants.
Notice what the letter never mentions. The temple never appears, and the silence has a purpose:
Notice that they do not accuse the people of rebuilding the temple. They do not say one word about it. They speak of the city instead. Their aim is easy to see. They wanted to stop the remnant from gathering together, because such a gathering would take away the enemy's power over the people of God... but scattered, they would easily fall prey to their adversaries. In the same way, Satan opposes the gathering of the children of God today. If he cannot corrupt the sheep, he makes them fall out, seizes them, and scatters them.
The work did stop. But one writer puts the real cause inside the people, not in the enemy's letter:
We must still stress this. These adversaries could have had no power against the people of God, if the people themselves had not lost faith in God and heart for their work. The apostle wrote, "A wide door for effective work has opened to me, and there are many adversaries" (1 Corinthians 16:9). Yet not one of his opponents could have hindered his work, because he was counting on Him who "opens, and no one will shut."
- Salt — "We eat the salt of the palace" means they were on the king's payroll. They dressed up dependence as duty.
- Mask — Their concern for the king's honour is a pleasing platitude. They used his name as the Pharisees used Caesar's before Pilate, with no love for him.
- Mixture — The letter's strength is half-truth. The charge about the wall was false; the record of past rebellion was true.
- Handle — Judah's last kings handed the adversary his opening. Unfaithful servants can dishonour the whole of God's work.
- Target — The temple is never named. The aim was to keep God's people scattered — and it only worked because their own faith had already failed.
that search may be made in the book of the annals of thy fathers so shalt thou find in the book of the annals and know that this city is a rebellious city, which has done damage to kings and provinces, and that they have raised sedition within the same of old time, for which cause this city was destroyed.
The accusers do not ask the king to take their word for it. They ask him to search the empire's records, because what he will find there about Jerusalem is not a lie but a fact.
The "book" they wanted searched was not a bound volume. It was an empire's filing system, and archaeologists have dug it up.
Ancient nations made records on cylinders or slabs of stone, or on clay, which was then baked or dried in the sun. Many such tablets have been found in the excavations at Nineveh, Babylon and other places. The 'book of the records' was very likely a collection of stone or clay tablets. In some cases these have been found in such numbers as to form quite a library.
The accusers were not inventing the city's reputation. They were quoting it — and the last generation of kings had handed them the material.
Then, assuming that the city was being rebuilt, they denounced it as a bad and rebellious place. It was true that the last few kings, and especially Zedekiah, had been bad men and unreliable. They broke their word in a rebellious spirit, and this gave some support to their accusation. God, however, had chosen the city at the first, and for a brief time it held dominion from Him. They got their chance to blacken the whole history of Jerusalem through the bad behaviour of the last kings who reigned there. It is a striking example of how unfaithful servants can dishonour the whole of God's work, and give the adversary the opening he wants.
Old sin, then, still had consequences in the world — though not the last word over a people God was protecting.
Their last king, Zedekiah, had "sworn by God" to be faithful to Nebuchadnezzar. But he broke his oath and rebelled against the king of Babylon. This brought about the destruction of Jerusalem, and brought God's judgment on himself as well. So there was truth in the accusation that Jerusalem had been a rebellious city. The remnant themselves were under the favour and protection of God, and no one could harm them as long as they went forward in confidence in Him. Yet under His government in this world they now suffered the consequence of the sins of their fathers.
The request looks like a call for open inquiry. It is nothing of the kind. There was a second document in those same archives, and they were careful not to mention it.
They asked the king for a search of the records to find out that Jerusalem was a rebellious city, causing harm to kings (of course such Gentile kings as Nebuchadnezzar). But they did not ask for the records of Cyrus having sent the Jews back to rebuild the temple.
The letter mixed real history with plain invention.
The letter is a very cunning piece of work, full of misrepresentation and falsehood. The one who is "a liar and the father of lies" inspired it. They accused the Jews of building Jerusalem and setting up the wall. This was a falsehood, for only the house was being built and not the wall or the city. What they said about the city, its former character of rebellion, was true, and the accuser made use of the past sins of the nation. But God had again been gracious to His people and turned their captivity… The same accuser of our brothers, liar and falsifier, stood behind these letter writers, and he is still at work.
The letter aimed straight at this king's own fears.
The adversaries of those days present the king with political reasons for preventing the reuniting of the people. Such motives carried great weight with this crafty, usurping king. In fact they were the only motives likely to catch his attention. The king notes that in former days Jerusalem once had powerful kings. If their throne were set up again, they would overshadow him. He also notes that the city had always shown itself rebellious towards any foreign rule. This is enough to stir him to put a stop to the work.
- Records. The "book of the records" was an empire's archive of clay and stone tablets. The accusers were sure a search of it would prove Jerusalem's long history of rebellion.
- Truth. The charge was not invented. Zedekiah's broken oath had made the city a rebel, and the enemy just read the file aloud.
- Selection. The same archive held Cyrus's decree sending the Jews back to rebuild. That was the one record they never asked the king to check.
- Accuser. Behind the letter stands the one who mixes real past sins with outright lies. He is still at work the same way.
- Consequence. Unfaithful servants can blacken the whole record of God's work. Yet the remnant stood under God's favour, and no enemy could stop them while they went forward trusting Him.
We inform the king that if this city be built and its walls be completed, by this means thou shalt have no portion on this side the river.
This verse is the closing line of a letter sent to the Persian king about the Jews who had returned to Jerusalem. It sounds like loyal advice to the throne, but the writers are playing on the king's fear of losing land and income.
One writer notes what the letter asked the king to check, and what it left out:
They asked the king to search the records for proof that Jerusalem was a rebellious city that had harmed kings. The kings they meant were Gentile rulers like Nebuchadnezzar. It was true that Zedekiah had sworn allegiance to Nebuchadnezzar and then rebelled against him. That is why Jerusalem was destroyed. But they did not ask for records of Cyrus having sent the Jews back to rebuild the temple. Instead they declare that if Jerusalem was rebuilt, the king would lose his rule over the land west of the River Euphrates.
A reader might expect the complaint to be about the temple. One writer explains the target the enemies chose instead:
Notice that they do not accuse the people of rebuilding the temple. They do not say one word about it. They speak of the city instead. Their aim is easy to see. They wished to prevent the remnant from gathering together, because such a gathering would take away the enemy's power over the people of God. Scattered, they would easily become the prey of their enemies. In the same way, Satan opposes the gathering of the children of God today. If he does not manage to corrupt the sheep, he makes them quarrel, tears at them, and scatters them.
The letter is not pure invention. One writer separates the false charge in it from the true one:
The letter is a very cunning document, full of false statements and lies, inspired by the one who is "a liar and the father of lies." They accused the Jews of building Jerusalem and setting up the wall. This was a lie, for they were building only the house, not the wall or the city. What they said about the city, its former character of rebellion, was true, and the accuser made use of the past sins of the nation. The same accuser of the brothers, liar and falsifier, who stood behind these letter writers, is still at work and will go on until he is thrown out (Rev. 12).
Another writer asks where the slander found its material:
But God had originally chosen the city, and for a short time it held rule given by Him. The bad behaviour of the last kings who reigned there gave them their chance to blacken the whole history of Jerusalem. It is a striking example of how unfaithful servants can dishonour the whole of God's work, and hand the adversary the opportunity he wants.
The letter sounds like concern for Persia. One writer tests that concern against a scene from the Gospels:
Were they really concerned about Persia? Only as far as they could gain from Persia. This was like the Pharisees telling Pilate concerning the Lord Jesus, "If you release this man, you are not Caesar's friend" (Jn. 19:12). They had no love for Caesar, but used his name to frighten Pilate. But these enemies of Judah only wanted Artaxerxes to suppose that the Jews would not pay tribute to Persia.
So did these enemies hold real power over God's people? One writer answers no:
The accusation that Jerusalem had been a rebellious city was therefore true. The remnant themselves were under the favour and protection of God, and no one could harm them as long as they went forward in confidence in Him. Yet under His government in this world they now suffered the consequence of the sins of their fathers. It must still be stressed that these adversaries could have had no power against the people of God, if the people themselves had not lost faith in God and heart for their work. The apostle Paul wrote, "a wide door for effective work has opened to me, and there are many adversaries" (1 Cor. 16:9). But not one of his opponents could have hindered his work, because he was counting on Him who "opens and no one will shut."
- Aim — The letter attacks the city, not the temple. A gathered people is a people the enemy cannot pick off one by one.
- Method — It mixes a true charge with a false one. Jerusalem had once rebelled; the walls were not in fact rising.
- Mask — The writers pose as guardians of the king's honour and income. They use his name as the Pharisees used Caesar's name against Pilate.
- Opening — The slander had material because earlier kings had been unfaithful. Unfaithful servants hand the adversary his opportunity.
- Answer — No accusation can stop a people who go forward in confidence in God. Lost faith and lost heart are what stop them.
The king sent an answer to Rehum the chancellor, and Shimshai the scribe, and the rest of their companions that dwell in Samaria, and the other places beyond the river Peace, and so forth.
The accusers' letter has reached the Persian court, and here the king answers it. His polite reply stopped the rebuilding of God's house for years. How did the enemy manage that?
The reply matches the letter that caused it. One writer points to what the accusers left out:
These "adversaries of Judah and Benjamin" had claimed they wanted to help build the temple, since they too sacrificed to the God of Israel. Yet in their accusation they say nothing about the temple. They speak only of the city. Their reason is obvious. The proclamation of Cyrus concerned the temple. So by accusing the Jews of building the city, they made their hinted charges of rebellion and treason look believable. The king's answer shows they had judged it right.
Two arguments moved the king, and the palace records backed them up:
The two motives urged on the king were protection against future danger and the possible loss of revenue. The appeal worked. The royal records also confirmed what the letter said about the city's past. So the king wrote, "Give the command now to make these men stop, and that this city not be built, until I give another command. Be careful not to fail in this; why should damage grow to the hurt of the kings?" (vv. 17-22). The adversaries had succeeded. They received the letter and went up at full speed, armed with royal authority. They made sure no one could go on building Jehovah's house. "They made them cease," it says, "by force and power."
The king who sent this reply was not the rightful heir to the throne:
Verses 7-23 describe the more successful scheme in the days of the Pseudo-Smerdis. He was a Magian usurper who impersonated the true Smerdis, Cyrus' younger son, whom Cambyses had put to death... After little more than seven months the false Smerdis, the Artaxerxes of our chapter, was killed, and Darius, one of the highest Persian nobles, gained the kingdom. This may explain why the impostor knew nothing of Cyrus' policy and so listened readily to arguments against it. It also explains why, under God, the king who shared the mind of Cyrus looked seriously into the truth and stood by the measures that honoured the God and people of Israel.
Another writer finds the enemy's real aim in their own words:
They wanted to stop the remnant from gathering together. Such a gathering would take away the enemy's power over the people of God: "If this city is built and its walls are finished, you will have no portion on this side of the river." Scattered, they would easily become the prey of their enemies. In the same way Satan opposes the gathering of the children of God today. If he cannot corrupt the sheep, he makes them quarrel, seizes them, and scatters them.
The Bible does not blame the king's letter for the work stopping. One writer presses the point:
Note this — it is a very important thing. God does not blame the stopping of the work on the king's command. The king did give in at last, and did yield to their constant pleading to stop the Israelites. The Israelites began to stop before the king's authority came. It was lack of faith, not the king's authority, that stopped the work; and, dear friends, as a rule, is it not always so? The ending of blessing among God's people is never the work of the enemy outside. It is lack of faith, and so of faithfulness, inside.
God is not named anywhere in this chapter, and the enemy appears to win. One commentator weighs that silence:
Altogether it is a sad chapter — the record of Satan's activity... God does not appear in it. To human eyes it looks as if the enemy has completely won. Yet though God does not step in, He is no uninterested spectator of what is happening. Whatever His people are, He remains faithful. He will have His people fully tested. But He only waits for the right moment to raise up a power the enemy cannot withstand.
- Reply — The accusers' letter spoke of the city, not the temple. That made the charge of rebellion stick, and the king's answer followed.
- Reason — Two arguments won him: fear of revolt, and lost revenue. The palace records confirmed the city's past, so the stop order came.
- Ruler — This Artaxerxes was a usurper. He knew nothing of Cyrus' policy, so he reversed it. Darius, the next king, looked into the truth and upheld it.
- Root — The building had already stalled before the letter came. Lack of faith inside, not authority outside, is what ends blessing among God's people.
- Rest — God is not named in the chapter, and the enemy looks like the winner. He is testing His people, waiting to raise up a power the enemy cannot resist.
The letter that ye sent to us has been read before me distinctly.
Rehum and Shimshai had written to the Persian king, accusing the Jews of rebuilding a rebellious city. This verse opens his reply. What he did with that letter — and what he never checked — handed the enemy success.
The king's answer moves in steps. He heard the letter, then ordered a search of the royal records — and the records backed up the accusers.
Artaxerxes replied to this letter. He told Rehum, Shimshai and their companions that their letter had been clearly read to him, so he gave the command to search the records. The records confirmed that Jerusalem had sometimes revolted against Gentile kings. They also showed that Jerusalem had once had mighty kings who collected tax, tribute and custom from others (v. 20). Since this was true, the king did not want to see Jerusalem revive and collect tribute from others instead of paying tribute to Persia.
Commentators differ on which Persian king is meant here. One view places it under a usurper. He had seized the throne, and he knew nothing of Cyrus's earlier policy toward the Jews:
Verses 7-23 describe the more successful scheme in the days of the false Smerdis, the usurper who pretended to be the true Smerdis, Cyrus's younger son... This may help explain why the impostor so readily listened to the charge against Cyrus's policy: he knew nothing of it. It may also explain why, under God, the ruler who agreed with the great king looked carefully into the truth and stood by the measures that honoured the God and people of Israel.
Another writer names different kings, and says plainly that the question is not settled:
It is very hard now to identify Ahasuerus and Artaxerxes with the rulers of secular history. Probably the first was Xerxes, and the second Artaxerxes Longimanus.
The search reached back into the city's past. It never tested the claim about the present.
The king received the letter and ordered a search into Jerusalem's earlier history. The search confirmed what the letter claimed, and he commanded at once that the city should not be built. No one uncovered the falsehood that they were building the city and the wall. The enemy was successful. Yet a faithful God watched over it all.
The accusers chose their words with care.
These "adversaries of Judah and Benjamin" had professed a desire to help in building the temple. Yet they leave out every reference to the temple in their accusation, and speak only of the city. Their reason was obvious. The proclamation of Cyrus was about the temple. So if they accused the Jews of building the city, they made the charges of rebellion and treason that they hinted at look believable. From the king's answer it is clear that they had not miscalculated.
The records told against Jerusalem because part of the charge was true.
Their last king, Zedekiah, had "sworn by God" to be faithful to Nebuchadnezzar. But he broke his oath and rebelled against the king of Babylon. So he brought about the destruction of Jerusalem, and brought the judgment of God on himself. (See 2 Chr. 36:13; Ezek. 17:12-16.) There was truth, therefore, in the accusation that Jerusalem had been a rebellious city. The remnant themselves were under the favour and protection of God, and no one could harm them as long as they went forward in confidence in Him. Yet they now suffered, under His government in this world, the consequence of the sins of their fathers.
From the king's desk the outcome looks like total defeat. The chapter never even mentions God.
Altogether it is a sad chapter — the account of the activity of Satan... God does not appear in it. Looked at with human eyes, it would seem as if the enemy had completely won. Yet though God does not step in, He is no uninterested spectator of what is taking place. Whatever His people are, He remains faithful.
- Read — the court read the letter aloud, then searched the records. They confirmed that Jerusalem had revolted before, and once had kings who collected tribute.
- Unread — no one checked the one false claim, that the walls were going up. The lie passed straight through.
- Reframed — the accusers named the city, never the temple, because Cyrus's decree covered the temple. The tactic worked.
- Remembered — Zedekiah's broken oath made the charge partly true. The remnant felt the cost of their fathers' sins.
- Unseen — God is never named in this chapter. Yet He is no uninterested spectator, and He stays faithful whatever His people are.
And I gave orders, and search has been made, and it has been found that this city of old time has made insurrection against the kings, and that rebellion and sedition have been raised therein.
Persia's king replies to the letter from Jerusalem's enemies. His officials search the royal records, and they find a history of revolt. The finding is true. Yet the enemy uses that true fact to stop a work that came from God.
The search was real, and the old records had plenty to show.
The closing verses of our chapter show that their letter had the desired effect. In those early days people kept careful records. When they searched, the records showed the unfaithful deeds of Zedekiah and others. They also showed the great power once held by men like David and Solomon. It seemed as if God's purpose in this matter had been completely defeated.
The records also explained why the king cared.
The search confirmed that Jerusalem had at times revolted against Gentile kings, and that Jerusalem had once had mighty kings who collected tax, tribute and custom from others. Since this was true, the king did not want to see Jerusalem revive in a way that would let it demand tribute from others instead of paying tribute to Persia.
The accusers asked for one kind of search and carefully avoided asking for another.
They asked the king to search the records for proof that Jerusalem was a rebellious city that harmed kings — Gentile kings, of course, such as Nebuchadnezzar. It was true that Zedekiah had rebelled against Nebuchadnezzar after swearing loyalty to him, and that is why Jerusalem was destroyed. But they did not ask for records of Cyrus having sent the Jews back to rebuild the temple.
One part of the letter went unchecked.
The king received the letter and ordered a search into Jerusalem's earlier history. It confirmed what the letter claimed, and he gave immediate orders that the city should not be built. No one uncovered the lie that they were building the city and the wall. The enemy was successful. Yet a faithful God watched over it all.
The people who came back had rebelled against no one. Their fathers had.
We should not pass over another point: Israel's sin in the past bears bitter fruit for these people who came back from captivity. Their last king, Zedekiah, had "sworn by God" to be faithful to Nebuchadnezzar. But he broke his oath and rebelled against the king of Babylon. So he brought about the destruction of Jerusalem, and he brought God's judgment on himself as well. There was truth, then, in the charge that Jerusalem had been a rebellious city. The remnant themselves were under God's favour and protection, and no one could harm them as long as they went forward in confidence in Him. Yet now, under His government in this world, they suffered the consequence of the sins of their fathers.
The enemies had earlier offered to help build the temple. In their letter the temple disappears and only the city is mentioned — and that choice was deliberate.
Notice that they do not accuse the people of rebuilding the temple. They do not say even one word about it. They speak of the city instead. Their aim is easy to see. They wanted to stop the remnant from gathering together, because such a gathering would take away the enemy's power over the people of God: "If this city is built and its walls are finished, you will have no portion on this side of the river." Scattered, the people would easily become the prey of their enemies.
The decree looks like the cause. But the work had already begun to stop before the king's letter came.
But notice this, and it is very important. God does not blame the ceasing of the work on the command of the king. The king did give in at last, and he did yield to their constant begging to stop the Israelites. But the Israelites began to stop before the king's order came. It was lack of faith, and not the king's authority, that stopped the work. And, dear friends, as a rule, is it not always so? The ending of blessing among God's people is never really the work of the enemy outside. It is a lack of faith, and so of faithfulness, within.
The decree bought the enemy time, and no more.
The weakness of the leaders showed itself even more in the people. They were troubled, or frightened away from building, for a long time. Yet the enemy could only delay, not frustrate, their purpose, which was of God.
- Search — The record was true. Zedekiah had broken his oath, and Jerusalem had fallen for it.
- Silence — The enemy asked for the record of rebellion, never for Cyrus's order to rebuild. Their own lie went unchecked.
- Harvest — The remnant stood under God's favour, yet still tasted the consequence of their fathers' sins.
- Target — The enemy named the city, not the temple. He aimed at the gathering of God's people, because scattered people are easy prey.
- Delay — The decree stopped the work for a time. But lack of faith inside was the real cause, and the enemy could only postpone a purpose that was God's.
And there have been mighty kings over Jerusalem, who have ruled over all beyond the river; and tribute, tax, and toll were paid to them.
A Persian king had his archives searched, and the search turned up something true: great kings had once ruled Jerusalem, and their power reached across the whole region. So the verse raises a hard question. What happens when enemies use the real history of God's people against them?
The king did not invent this. He had it looked up, and the records backed the accusers.
Artaxerxes replied to this letter. He told Rehum, Shimshai and their companions that their letter had been read out to him. So he gave command to search the records. The records confirmed that Jerusalem had at times revolted against Gentile kings. They also confirmed that Jerusalem had once had mighty kings who collected tax, tribute and custom from others (v. 20). Since this was true, the king did not want to see Jerusalem revive and take tribute from others instead of paying tribute to Persia.
One writer traces that reach back to Solomon, and sees in it a small picture of a far greater reign. (Older translations call the same region "on this side of the river.")
Solomon's dominion was only a weak type of Christ's, who will have "the ends of the earth" for His possession. The king of Israel ruled "over all the region on this side of the river," "to the land of the Philistines, and to the border of Egypt." These were the limits the Lord had assigned to Israel in Joshua 1:4. But Solomon's wisdom reached far beyond those limits.
The letter that provoked this reply mixed truth with lies. One writer names who inspired it.
The letter is a very clever document, full of misrepresentation and falsehood, inspired by the one who is "a liar and the father of lies." They accused the Jews of rebuilding Jerusalem and setting up the wall. This was false, since they were building only the house, not the wall or the city. What they said about the city, its old habit of rebellion, was true, and the accuser made use of the past sins of the nation. But God had been gracious to His people again and had brought them back from captivity. … The same accuser of God's people, the liar and falsifier who stood behind these letter writers, is still at work, and he will keep at it until he is thrown out (Rev. 12).
The dominion in this verse was not seized; God gave it. But the city's last kings gave the accusers their opening.
The city, however, had been chosen by God, and for a short time it held dominion from Him. The bad behaviour of the last kings who reigned there gave the accusers their chance to blacken the whole history of Jerusalem. This is a striking example of how unfaithful servants can dishonour the whole of God's work, and give the adversary the opening he wants.
The reasons that moved the king were political, not religious.
The adversaries of those days give the king political reasons for stopping the people from coming together again. Such motives carried great weight with this crafty king, who had seized his own throne, and in fact they were the only motives that could catch his interest. He notes that Jerusalem once had powerful kings, and that they would overshadow him if their throne were set up again. He also notes that the city had always shown itself ready to rebel against any foreign rule. That is enough to stir him to stop the work.
The building had already stalled before the king's order arrived. One writer puts the real cause in the people, not in the palace.
But they were timid then, through lack of faith. The Jews were terrified, and they lost heart long before their adversaries managed to get a ban from the king who had seized the throne. … The state soon took back the approval it had given them, and their adversaries had nothing but ill will until a king arose who did not know Isaiah's prophecy. Yet they were held back from the work while they themselves forgot or ignored the word of Jehovah. And it was not the world's smile or authority that renewed their courage and called them back to His work.
Later in the book a Persian king gives up these same three payments.
More than this, the king ordered that no one could impose tax, tribute or custom on any of the priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers, Nethinim (temple servants) or servants of the house of God. Rehum and Shimshai had urged an earlier Artaxerxes to stop the Jews from building, claiming that the Jews would not pay tax, tribute or custom. But this king was now ready to give up these payments for the leaders of Israel, so that Judah would prosper.
- Record — The king ordered a search. The archives confirmed both the revolts and the mighty kings who once collected tribute.
- Glory — The city held that rule from God, and one writer sees Solomon's reach as a faint picture of Christ's far wider reign.
- Twist — The adversaries' letter mixed real facts with plain lies. The accuser behind it used the nation's past sins, and he still works that way.
- Fear — The appeal was political, not religious. The king heard that Jerusalem's old kings might overshadow him, and that was enough to stop the work.
- Reversal — Their own loss of faith stopped the work more than any decree did. Later a king waived the very tax, tribute and custom once used as a weapon, so Judah would prosper.
Now give order to make these men to cease, and that this city be not built, until the order shall be given from me;
This verse is the royal order that halted the rebuilding of God's house. The enemies of the returned exiles won it from the king, and it raises two questions: what moved him to sign it, and what really kept the work stopped.
The letter that reached the palace said nothing about worship. It made the case in political terms, and that is what the king weighed.
The enemies of that day give the king political reasons for stopping the people from coming together again. Such reasons carried great weight with this crafty king, who had seized his throne. In fact they were the only reasons that could catch his interest. He notes that Jerusalem once had powerful kings, and that they would overshadow him if their throne were set up again. He also notes that the city had always shown itself rebellious against any foreign rule. That is enough to stir him to stop the work. As soon as they had his authorization, the enemies of Israel "went in haste to the Jews at Jerusalem and by force and power made them cease."
Another writer adds what tipped the decision.
The two motives urged on the king were protection against future danger and the possible loss of revenue. The records in the royal archives confirmed what had been said about the city's past, and so he gave his order.
The order forbids rebuilding "this city." It says nothing about the temple, and the accusers had a reason for that.
One part of the accusation was true. Jerusalem had rebelled before, and the returned exiles now paid for it.
Their last king, Zedekiah, had "sworn by God" to stay loyal to Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon. But he broke his oath and rebelled against him. This brought about the destruction of Jerusalem, and it brought God's judgment on him as well. So there was truth in the accusation that Jerusalem had been a rebellious city. The remnant themselves were under God's favour and protection, and no one could harm them as long as they went forward trusting Him. Yet they now suffered, under His government in this world, the consequence of the sins of their fathers.
Read on its own, this verse looks like the cause of the long delay. The order of events says otherwise.
But notice this, and it is very important. God does not blame the stopping of the work on the king's command. The king did give in at last, and did yield to their constant begging to make the Israelites stop. But the Israelites began to stop before the king's order came. It was lack of faith, not the king's authority, that stopped the work. And, dear friends, as a rule, is it not always so? The ending of blessing among God's people is never the work of the enemy outside. It is lack of faith, and so of faithfulness, within.
The decree sets its own limit: the ban stands until the king speaks again. The fear it caused lasted far longer.
The weakness of the leaders showed itself even more in the people. They were troubled, frightened away from building for a long time. Yet the enemy could only delay their purpose, not defeat it, for that purpose was from God.
So what should a believer do when force stops the work?
Whether the world opposes or the world approves is a matter of the circumstances God arranges. The believer must obey God. If the world steps in or persecutes him, he has to suffer. But he is on the earth to do God's will, and if force stops him he can wait for God's time.
- Motive — Politics and revenue moved the king, not worship: a city with a record of revolt.
- Method — The accusers said "city," never "temple." Cyrus' permission covered the temple, so it could not shield the work.
- Memory — Zedekiah's broken oath made the charge of rebellion true. Past sin still carried a cost under God's government.
- Mistake — The builders stopped before the decree ever came. The failure was lack of faith within, not the enemy outside.
- Moment — The ban ran only "until" the king spoke again. The enemy could delay God's work, never cancel it.
and take heed that ye fail not to do this why should harm grow to the damage of the kings?
Artaxerxes closes his reply to Jerusalem's accusers with a warning and a question about damage to the crown. Two questions follow. What damage did a Persian king fear from a small band of returned exiles, and why did God let such a letter succeed?
Commentators name the two things that moved him:
Two motives were urged on the king: protection against future danger, and the possibility of lost revenue. They appealed to him in this way, and the records in the royal archives confirmed what they had said about the city's past. So he wrote that these men must be made to stop, and that the city must not be rebuilt, until he himself gave another command. The adversaries were successful. With the letter in hand they hurried up, armed with royal authority, and made sure no one could carry on building the Lord's house. "They made them cease," it says, "by force and power."
One commentator shows how empty that fear was:
Since this was true, the king did not want Jerusalem to rise again as a city that collected tribute from others instead of paying tribute to Persia… He should have seen that a revolt against Persia was very unlikely. The Jews were now so weak that their former state would never return.
Read the accusation again and something is missing. The temple is never mentioned. The wording was chosen on purpose:
Notice that they do not accuse the people of rebuilding the temple. They do not say one word about it. They speak of the city instead. Their aim is easy to see. They wanted to stop the remnant from gathering together. Such a gathering would take away the enemy's power over the people of God… but scattered, they would easily become the prey of their enemies. In the same way, Satan opposes the gathering of the children of God today. If he cannot corrupt the sheep, he makes them fall out with each other, seizes them, and scatters them.
The charge worked because it was not a lie:
Their last king, Zedekiah, had "sworn by God" to be faithful to Nebuchadnezzar. But he broke his oath and rebelled against the king of Babylon. So he brought about the destruction of Jerusalem, and he brought God's judgment on himself too… There was truth, therefore, in the charge that Jerusalem had been a rebellious city. The remnant themselves were under the favour and protection of God, and no one could harm them as long as they went forward in confidence in Him. Yet they now suffered, under His government in this world, the consequence of the sins of their fathers.
The decree looks like the cause. One commentator points elsewhere:
But notice this — it is very important. God does not blame the stopping of the work on the king's command, even though the king did give in at last… The Israelites began to stop before the king's order came. It was lack of faith, not the king's authority, that stopped the work. And, dear friends, as a rule, is it not always so? The ending of blessing among God's people is never really the work of the enemy outside. It is lack of faith, and so lack of faithfulness, within.
The order had a limit: it held only until the king gave another command. And the chapter's silence about God is not His absence:
Altogether it is a sad chapter — the record of Satan's activity. Its one bright gleam is the faithfulness of Israel's leaders in refusing an alliance with the world… God does not appear in it. To human eyes it would look as if the enemy had won completely. Yet while God does not step in, He is no uninterested onlooker. Whatever His people are, He stays faithful.
- Damage feared. Artaxerxes acted to guard his revenue and his throne. Commentators call the fear groundless: the returned people were far too weak to threaten Persia.
- Damage aimed. The accusers never named the temple. They attacked the city, because a gathered people is beyond the enemy's reach, while a scattered one is easy prey.
- Damage inherited. The charge of rebellion was true history. Under God's government the returned exiles bore the consequences of their fathers' broken oaths.
- Damage done. The work stopped from the inside, not from the royal order. Lost faith is where blessing among God's people dies.
- Damage limited. The ban held only until the king gave another command. God seemed absent, but He was watching, and He stays faithful.
As soon as the copy of king Artaxerxes' letter was read before Rehum, and Shimshai the scribe, and their companions, they went up in haste to Jerusalem to the Jews, and made them cease by force and power.
The king's reply has arrived. The men who wrote against Jerusalem now have what they wanted: royal permission to stop the building. Two questions follow. Why did a Persian king care about a small building project? And was the enemy's letter the true reason the work stopped?
The order of events here puzzles many readers.
Here there is a considerable gap. Several kings reigned between Cyrus and Darius, and they appear in the rest of the chapter. That part is an insert (verses 6-23), explaining what took place between those two points.
The verse turns on how quickly the opponents moved once the answer arrived. One writer traces the king's reasoning and then the result: the two arguments in the letter were fear of future trouble and fear of lost income, and the palace records appeared to back them up.
The adversaries were successful, and having received the letter, they went up as fast as they could, armed with royal authority, and effectively made sure no attempt could be made to continue the work of building the Lord's house. "They made them cease," it says, "by force and power."
Why would a Persian king bother with a city far away?
The adversaries of those days present the king with political reasons for preventing the reuniting of the people. Such motives had great weight with this crafty, usurping monarch and, in fact, were the only motives that might draw his concern. The king notes that Jerusalem once had powerful kings. They would overshadow him if their throne were re-established. He also notes that the city had always shown itself rebellious against any foreign rule. This is enough to stir him to put a stop to the work.
Was the accusation just a lie?
Their last king, Zedekiah, had "sworn by God" to be faithful to Nebuchadnezzar, but he broke his oath and rebelled against the king of Babylon. So there was truth in the accusation that Jerusalem had been a rebellious city. The returned exiles were under God's favour and protection, and no one could harm them as long as they went forward in confidence in Him. Yet they now suffered, in His government in this world, the consequence of the sins of their fathers.
The opposition changed shape as the chapter went on.
And so these four hostile forces unite here to ruin the work of God: trickery, intimidation, accusation, and violence. Only faith could have resisted them. But the people had no faith at all, and so the building of the house stopped for fifteen years.
Commentators press a point the verse does not say out loud. Compared with the prophecy of Haggai, it appears the work had already slowed badly before any order came from Persia.
But notice this — it is very important. God does not attribute the stopping of the work to the king's command. The king did give in at last, and did yield to their persistent begging to stop the Israelites. The Israelites began to stop before the king's authority arrived. It was lack of faith, not the king's authority, that stopped the work; and, beloved friends, as a rule, is it not always so? The ceasing of blessing among God's people is really never the work of the enemy outside, but lack of faith, and therefore of faithfulness, within.
The same writer quoted above tests this by a New Testament case, where opposition and open opportunity existed side by side.
These adversaries could have had no power against the people of God if the people themselves had not lost faith in God and heart for their work. The apostle wrote, "For a wide door for effective work has opened to me, and there are many adversaries" (1 Cor. 16:9); but not one of his opponents could have hindered his work, because he was counting on Him who "opens and no one will shut."
Something is missing from the end of the chapter, and its absence is the point.
We can well imagine the scene when the letter was read before Rehum and Shimshai and their companions. They must have rushed up to Jerusalem in a fever of haste, and made them stop the work by force and power. "Then the work on the house of God that is in Jerusalem stopped, and it stopped until the second year of the reign of Darius king of Persia." The returned exiles faced a hard test, and a decline set in at that time. Their former energy seems to have left them, as we find when we consider Haggai's message. Nor do we read anything at the close of this chapter about turning to the LORD in prayer.
Nothing in the closing verses records God speaking or acting.
Altogether it is a sad chapter — the account of Satan's activity. The only bright gleam in it is the faithfulness of the leaders of Israel in refusing an alliance with the world. The rest of the chapter is darkness. God does not appear in it; and, looked at with human eyes, it would seem as if the enemy had completely conquered. Yet while God does not step in, He is no uninterested spectator of what is taking place. Whatever His people are, He remains faithful. He will have His people thoroughly tested. But we shall see that He only waits for the right moment to raise up a power the enemy will not be able to withstand.
- Fear — The charge that moved the king was political, not religious: a rebuilt Jerusalem meant rival kings and a rebel city.
- Force — Armed with the king's letter, the opponents rushed to Jerusalem and stopped the building by force and power.
- Fault — Yet the work had already begun to stop before the king's order came. The real cause was unbelief inside, not the enemy outside.
- Faith — Trickery, intimidation, accusation and violence came in turn. Only faith could have stood against them, and the people had none.
- Faithfulness — God does not appear in the chapter, but He is not absent. He waits for the moment to raise up a power the enemy cannot resist.
Then ceased the work of the house of God which is at Jerusalem; and it ceased until the second year of the reign of Darius king of Persia.
Ezra 4 ends with the temple work at a standstill, and the pause runs on for years until a new king takes the throne. Was this the enemy's victory, or had something already failed inside the people who had come back?
The chapter closes with no sign of God stepping in. One writer weighs that silence.
Altogether it is a sad chapter — the account of the activity of Satan. The only bright gleam in it is the faithfulness of the leaders of Israel in refusing the alliance of the world. The rest of the chapter is darkness. God does not appear in it; and, looked at with human eyes, it would seem as if the enemy had completely conquered. While, however, God does not interpose, He is no uninterested spectator of what is taking place. Whatever His people are, He stays faithful. He will let His people be fully tested. But He is only waiting for the right moment to raise up a power the enemy will not be able to withstand.
Verse 24 does not follow on from the letters just quoted. The same writer traces the chapter's order, and dates the stoppage earlier than the royal ban.
Verses 4 and 5 sum up what the enemies of Israel did during the reigns of Cyrus, Ahasuerus, and Artaxerxes. So verse 24 connects with verse 5, and everything in between is a side note... Compare the prophecies of Haggai with this chapter, and it seems the people of Israel stopped building long before their enemies got the ban... Fear of their enemies was stronger than their faith in God. So they lost heart, thought only of themselves and their own selfish interests, and began to build their own houses. They said, "The time has not yet come to rebuild the house of the LORD."
The enemy had only the power that unbelief handed him. One writer sets an apostle's work beside theirs.
These adversaries could have had no power against the people of God, if the people themselves had not lost faith in God and heart for their work. The apostle wrote, "a wide door for effective work has opened to me, and there are many adversaries" (1 Cor. 16:9). But not one of his opponents could have stopped his work, because he was counting on Him who "opens and no one will shut." It would have been the same for the returned people, if not for their own laziness and unbelief.
The enemy used more than one method in this chapter. Another writer names all four, and what alone could have met them.
So four hostile forces join here to ruin the work of God: cunning, intimidation, accusation, and violence. Only faith could have resisted them. But the people had no faith at all, and so the building of the house was stopped for fifteen years.
The word "until" points forward. The second year of Darius is where the silence breaks, and Rossier names what restarted the work.
The elders among the Jews build and prosper through the prophesying of Haggai and Zechariah... Four years later the house of God was completed. How disastrous are the delays caused by the fear of man, and by the lack of confidence in the Lord that always follows it!
The people started building again before any new permission came.
They should always have leaned directly upon God, and gone on with the work, unless hindered by force... The king's support had been prepared by God for the moment in which their faith should have been shown. In fact, the difficulty did arise. But faith was at work, so they kept building despite their enemies... A difficulty may be real. Yet it is only an obstacle to unbelieving hearts, if we are on the path of God's will. Faith counts on God and does what He wills, and difficulties are nothing before Him. Unbelief can always find excuses, and excuses that look well founded too. They have only one fatal defect: they leave God out.
- Cunning, then force. The enemy used four weapons: cunning, intimidation, accusation, and violence. Only faith could have withstood them.
- Fear before the ban. The people stopped building before the royal ban even arrived. Fear of their enemies beat their faith, so they built their own houses instead.
- Excuses leave God out. A difficulty is only an obstacle to unbelief; unbelief's reasons always look well founded, and always omit God.
- Delay is costly. The fear of man cost them years — yet once the work restarted, the house took only four.
- God waits, He does not lose. God does not appear in this chapter, but He is watching. He tests His people, then raises up a power the enemy cannot withstand.
Now the prophets, Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo, prophesied to the Jews that were in Judah and Jerusalem; in the name of the God of Israel [did they prophesy] to them.
The building of God's house had stopped, halted by hostile neighbours and a royal ban. Then two men begin to speak, and this verse raises the question of how a stalled work of God ever restarts.
The chapter before ended in defeat. What breaks the deadlock is not a friendlier king.
There is another thing of great interest. God did not set this right by the king's authority opening the door again. He set it right by His own power stepping in — the power of the Spirit of God through the prophets. It is by the prophets, not by the king — not by Darius. "Then Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel and Jeshua the son of Jozadak arose and began to rebuild the house of God that is in Jerusalem." How bold faith is! And God justifies the faith He gives... Artaxerxes had stopped the building of the house, but Cyrus had authorised it earlier. They were quite right to fall back on the word of Cyrus. Yet the great thing that moved their souls was that this was the word of God — through the prophets.
Chapter 4 makes the builders look like victims of force. The prophets' books tell a different story.
At first sight, the work in chapter 4 stopped because of things beyond the builders' control. What could they do when force and authority stopped them? And yet the prophecies of the two prophets named at the start of chapter 5, especially Haggai, show reasons beneath the surface. The people had lost interest in the house of God and turned to their own houses. Haggai had to deliver a stern message, addressing the consciences. Only after this could he deliver a message of comfort, assuring the people of God's presence and support.
Zerubbabel the governor and Jeshua the high priest were already in charge of the work.
Note that God raised up the prophet as the means of communication with His people when the responsible head or heads of the people had failed. So when the priesthood had failed under Eli, Samuel was God's chosen vessel for His messages to His people. This explains why the greatest of the prophets appeared at the darkest periods in the history of Israel — Elijah and Elisha, for example. In our chapter Zerubbabel the governor and Jeshua the high priest were the responsible heads of the people who had returned from captivity. But the constant attacks of their enemies wore them out. They gave way along with the people, and with them they stopped building the house of the Lord.
Only two names appear here. Two were enough, because of what they carried.
To produce this revival, two prophets are enough here. They were the bearers and the representatives of the word of God for the people. Through them the Word, brought again to light by the power of the Holy Spirit, reaches the conscience. Later, when Ezra comes on the scene, we will see this same Word presented to souls with no signs of prophetic power... A period of revival which is not followed by scriptural teaching will be short-lived and will die out.
The ban was still in force when the builders went back to work.
The people did not wait for the Gentile authorities to renew their commission to build... but God Himself had spoken, and if they were to render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, they were also to render to God the things that are God's. When God condescends to speak, His claims are supreme, whatever the consequences. Builders of a later day recognised this principle. Peter and John were forbidden to speak or teach in the name of Jesus. They replied, "Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge, for we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard."
This is a pattern, not a one-off.
When Haggai delivered his burning message, the LORD revived them again. They rose from their apathy and began to build the house of the LORD, the prophets of God helping them... No sooner had they obeyed and feared the LORD than another message came through the prophet: "I am with you, declares the LORD." They no longer feared their enemies or the king's command, but they feared the LORD... The Word of the LORD was used in their revival. Every true and genuine revival always started and always will start with the Word of God, hearing and believing what God has spoken.
- Word first. The stalled work restarted through prophecy, not a royal permit. God worked by His Spirit through two men.
- Word exposes. The ban hid a quieter failure. The people had turned from God's house to their own, and Haggai's stern message reached the conscience before it brought comfort.
- Word arrives. God raises up prophets when the leaders have given way. That is why the greatest of them appear in Israel's darkest hours.
- Word emboldens. God had spoken, so the builders acted before permission came. Peter and John later stood on the same ground: God's claim outranks any other.
- Word teaches. Two men were enough to reach the conscience. But a revival with no teaching from Scripture dies out.
Then rose up Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and began to build the house of God which is at Jerusalem; and with them were the prophets of God, who helped them.
Work on the temple had stopped for years, and now two men start building again without a new permit from the empire. What moved them, what right did they have, and why does the verse add that the prophets were with them?
The dates in the prophets point to a deeper cause, one lying in the returned exiles themselves.
Many years passed before the ban on building came. I have examined the prophecies that throw so much light on this same period, and compared their dates. It seems clear to me that the real hindrance was the remnant's own lack of faith. There were enemies in the land who made them afraid and so stopped their building... They began to build again not because someone brought them the king's decree, but because they feared the Lord and did not fear the king's command, as seeing Him who is invisible... The source of their weakness was that they had forgotten God. This shows the great grace of God in waking them up through Haggai.
Fear was not the whole story.
Fear of the enemy was not the only thing that led them to stop their work. Their own hearts were also settling down on their own ease and comfort. They found time to build their own houses while saying, "The time has not yet come to rebuild the house of the Lord."
The verse names only two builders at the start. Nobody waited for the crowd to agree.
When it was a matter of building the house, the leaders do not wait for everyone to agree, nor do they try to stir up some common action. This will always be the case. The only way to stir up the activity of faith in others is to take up that activity yourself. It takes a heart deeply marked by what is due to the Lord and by our responsibility toward Him. We may be only two or three... but we may be sure that our zeal will bear its fruit.
Starting again meant defying a standing order. Commentators answer the question of authority on two levels. First, the principle:
No doubt they were under the powers God has ordained, and a decree forbade them to build. But God Himself had spoken. So if they were to give Caesar the things that are Caesar's, they were also to give God the things that are God's. When God stoops to speak, His claims come first, above every other consideration, whatever the consequences. Peter and John, builders of a later day, recognised this principle. Forbidden to speak or teach in the name of Jesus, they replied, "Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge; for we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard." In truth, faith links itself with God Himself, with His objects and His power, and can then peacefully leave every other question with Him.
Second, the plain legal fact. An older royal decree still stood in their favour.
How bold faith is! And God justifies the faith that He gives. This looked like a lack of respect for royal authority. In fact they had at least as good an authority for going on with the work. Artaxerxes stops the building of the house here, but Cyrus had authorised it earlier. They did what was quite right... They went back to what Cyrus had commanded.
The last clause describes an ongoing partnership.
This last phrase refers to the ongoing work of the prophets while the building went on. Through it the Lord encouraged His people to keep at their labours. He unfolded before them the glory of the future, tied to the coming of the Messiah and the setting up of His kingdom. The people built and the prophets prophesied. Both alike filled their appointed places, and both alike carried out their task in fellowship with the mind of God.
The two prophets did not preach the same thing.
Haggai prophesied about the house of God. Zechariah emphasised the city of Jerusalem... The city was only to surround the house, but the house was God's centre.
Jeshua is also called Joshua. These two men point beyond their own day.
Joshua and Zerubbabel stood at the head of those left of Judah and Benjamin. When they returned to Jerusalem, their condition was one of deep humiliation. They were weak representatives of the priesthood and of royalty. At the same time they were forerunners, pictures, of the Messiah in His future glory.
- Cause — Fear and comfort stopped the work, not the ban. The real hindrance was lack of faith.
- Cure — God's word through two prophets, not a royal permit, put the builders back on their feet.
- Courage — When God has spoken, His claim comes first. Their obedience also rested on Cyrus's earlier decree.
- Company — Two men began without waiting for the rest. The people built, the prophets prophesied, each in their own place.
- Centre — The house, not the city, was God's centre. Its two builders point on to the Messiah.
At that time came to them Tatnai, governor on this side the river, and Shethar-boznai, and their companions, and said thus to them Who gave you orders to build this house and to complete this wall?
Work on the temple had just restarted under the preaching of Haggai and Zechariah. At once a Persian official arrives with a legal question: who gave you permission? The verse raises the issue behind the whole chapter. What do God's people do when God tells them to build and the government has said no?
The words "at the same time" tie the challenge to the restarted building. One writer contrasts it with the quiet years before:
Satan is still working behind the scene. Whenever God acts on the earth through His people, Satan at once works against it. This is the force of the words, "At the same time." We do not read of any persecution while they were building their own houses, the time Haggai speaks of. But at once, when they take up their work on Jehovah's house again, they are met by new tricks — in fact, open opposition.
The same writer applies it to believers today:
If believers settle down in the world, mind earthly things, and become "dwellers on earth" — using that phrase in its moral sense — Satan will leave them alone. But the moment the Spirit of God works in them, so that they grasp His mind and go out in living testimony, the adversary will try to turn them aside. He will use any art or device likely to achieve his purpose.
Tattenai is not written off as a villain. He is the regional governor, and a royal order stopping the work was on record:
In making this enquiry the governor was certainly within his rights. He was acting in the interests of his king, since a decree had gone out forbidding the building of the city, if not of the temple. He could know nothing of any commandment except that of his own king. The children of this world can never understand the claims of God upon His people. It always seems foolish to them that anyone should risk a ruler's anger to please One they themselves do not believe in.
The builders had not waited for a fresh permit from Persia:
No doubt they were subject to the powers ordained by God, and a decree forbidding them to build had been obtained. But God Himself had spoken. So if they were to render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, they were also to render to God the things that are God's. When God stoops to speak, His claims are supreme. They stand above every other consideration, whatever the consequences.
The builders also had an answer within Persian law. One writer weighs the two royal orders against each other:
If Artaxerxes had forbidden the building of the temple at the start, they might have been in difficulty. God's direct claim would have stood on one side and the kingdom's claim on the other. The principle would then apply that we must obey God rather than men. But in fact the case lay between two kings. There was one difference, and a very great one: the first and greatest king, the founder of the Persian monarchy, was the very one who had commanded the building of the temple.
God did not leave His people to face the enemy alone:
The eye of God was on His beloved people, seeing their danger. He would supply the courage they needed in the presence of the enemy. He would give them the sense of His presence and shelter, and so stir them to persevere in their work. And it is a wonderful thing for our souls when we realise in any measure that the eye of God is upon us. It produces in us that holy fear which makes us fearless of man.
The question went up to Darius, and the reply went further than the builders asked:
To faith it was clear that God was working behind the scenes, using the power of the enemy to carry out His own purposes... When their adversaries interfered, Darius did more than confirm the decree of Cyrus. He issued another decree: all the provision needed for the house of God was to be supplied at his own expense.
- Obedience — The people restarted the work on God's word, not on a royal permit. When God speaks, His claim outranks every other.
- Opposition — Nobody troubled them while they built their own houses. The challenge came the instant they obeyed.
- Question — Tattenai's demand was fair in law. The world cannot see why anyone would risk a king's anger for a God it does not believe in.
- Protection — The eye of God was on the elders. That watching eye kept the enemy from stopping the work.
- Outcome — The enemy's own enquiry went to Darius and came back as a confirmed decree with royal funding. Opposition became the means of finishing the house.
And they said to them after this manner What are the names of the men that build this building?
The prophets Haggai and Zechariah had stirred the people to start building the temple again. The first stones were barely up when a Persian official named Tattenai arrived with questions — including a demand for the names of every man on the job.
Older English translations read "we" here, which would make the Jews the speakers. Verse 10 points the other way.
The fourth verse is somewhat ambiguous. Comparing it with verse 10, it is clear that the "we" of verse 4 applies to the enemies of Israel. They were the ones who asked, "What are the names of the men who are building this building?" Their aim was to report to the king these men who were breaking his command.
Another writer names the questioners and the enemy behind them.
They asked the questions, "Who has commanded you to build this house, and to make up the wall? What are the names of the men who are building this building?" ("We" in verse 4 is "they," Tattenai and his companions. See verse 10.) So the enemy made another effort to hinder the work. He never fails to attack what is done for the glory of God.
Whoever asked, Judah gave a straight answer.
Judah had nothing to hide, and told them the names of the men who were supervising the work. They told them more than this as well, as the letter Tattenai sent to the king of Persia shows.
Verse 3 opens with a note of timing — "at the same time." Nobody had bothered these people during the years they were panelling their own homes.
We do not read of any persecution of the people during the time Haggai speaks of, when they were building their own houses. But the moment they take up their work on the Lord's house again, new tricks meet them — in fact, open opposition… Suppose believers settle down in the world, set their minds on earthly things, and become "dwellers on earth" — using that phrase in its moral sense. Satan will let them alone. But the moment they grasp God's mind and go out in living testimony, the adversary will try to turn them aside by any art or device likely to serve his purpose.
A standing decree forbade the work, and the builders went ahead anyway.
No doubt they were subject to the powers God had ordained, and a decree forbidding them to build was in force. But God Himself had spoken. If they were to render to Caesar the things that were Caesar's, they were also to render to God the things that were God's. When God condescends to speak, His claims are supreme. They stand above every other consideration, whatever the consequences may be. The builders of a later day recognised this principle. When the authorities forbade Peter and John to speak or teach in the name of Jesus, they replied, "Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge, for we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard."
A register of names sent to a Persian court could have ended in arrests. Verse 5 answers the threat before it lands.
The eye of God was on His beloved people, and He saw their danger. He watched so that He might give them the courage they needed in front of the enemy, make them aware of His presence and shelter, and so spur them on to keep at their work. And it is a wonderful thing for our souls when we realise in any measure that the eye of God is on us. It produces in us that holy fear which makes us fearless of man.
When the elders did reply at length, they led not with legal papers but with an identity.
They tell their own history, and the history of the temple they were building. Nothing could be simpler or more beautiful. Before anything else they declare themselves "the servants of the God of heaven and earth." In dealing with the tricks of Satan there is no weapon more powerful than the bold confession of our true character.
Their confession came with no claim to be better than the nations watching them.
The people do not try to make their guilt look smaller. Instead they acknowledge before the nations that they are under God's judgment… God asks of His servants that their testimony be above all the testimony of their ruin, so that it may be effective.
- Named. Enemies asked for a list of builders. The names went straight into a report for the Persian king.
- Noticed. No one troubled them while they built their own houses. Opposition came the moment they built God's.
- Ordered. A royal ban stood against the work, yet God had spoken; Caesar gets what is Caesar's, God gets what is God's.
- Watched. Their names went to Persia, but "the eye of their God was on the elders of the Jews." That watching eye makes people fearless of men.
- Owned. Their defence was a confession. They were servants of the God of heaven and earth, and they owned God's judgment on their past.
But the eye of their God was upon the elders of the Jews, and they did not make them cease till the matter came to Darius; and then they returned answer by letter concerning it.
Officials come to the builders at Jerusalem. They demand to know who authorised the work, and they ask for the names of every man involved. The building carries on anyway. The reason has nothing to do with the strength of the workers.
This watching is not neutral. One writer sees God taking in the whole danger His people stood in, and giving them what they needed to keep going.
The eye of God was upon His beloved people, seeing their danger. He watched so that He might give them the courage they needed in front of the enemy. He would make them aware of His presence and shelter, and so stir them up to keep on with their work. And it really is a wonderful thing for our souls when we realise, even a little, that the eye of God is upon us. It produces in us that holy fear which makes us fearless of man. It also gives us the sweet sense of His presence and protection covering us. In His grace He has bound us to Himself by ties that cannot perish.
The trouble started the moment the building restarted. Commentators trace this to a pattern: the enemy attacks what is done for God.
Suppose believers settle down in the world, set their minds on earthly things, and become "dwellers on earth" — the phrase is meant in a moral sense. Then Satan will leave them alone. But the Spirit of God may move them to grasp His mind and go out in living testimony. The moment they do, the adversary will try to turn them aside by any trick or device likely to succeed.
The officials named in this chapter are not the ones who blocked the work earlier. Later, new names appear again. The faces change; the resistance does not.
One group of men succeeds another in their hatred against the work of God, some more violent, some less. But the opposition remains, because the enemy who uses all these instruments has not changed. If only faith would never let the obstacles raised by Satan's agents stop it! If only we understood well that no one can destroy the work of God, because God remains over and above it all!
The verse says the enemies "did not stop them." One writer names who held them back, and who kept the builders going.
These enemies did not reckon with the Keeper of Israel who neither sleeps nor slumbers. They did not know it, but what they were doing would lead to victory for God's people. It would end in the finishing of the house of God. The eye of God was upon the elders of the Jews. He gave them strength, courage and assurance, so that they could persevere in the work.
The builders did not wait for fresh permission from Persia before picking up their tools. Two prophets had spoken, and that was enough. The authority to build had been theirs all along.
Grace working through the word is what called them back to His work, not the decree of the Persian power. They were not acting against authority. Cyrus had given them that authority at the start, in line with prophecy spoken before he was born and before Judah went to Babylon. But their enemies frightened them, and they turned to their own affairs and neglected God's house. That encouraged the effort to stop them by the world's authority... Then the prophets Haggai and Zechariah roused them from their laziness and their fears, and they took up the work again in the face of opposition and threats. But it was all in vain.
The work goes on "until the report should reach Darius." That report was meant to shut the project down. It did the opposite.
Faith could see God at work behind the scenes. He used the power of the enemy to carry out His own purposes. Here is another instance of how He causes all things to work together for good to those who love Him. When their adversaries interfered, Darius confirmed the decree of Cyrus. He also issued a second decree: he himself would pay for everything the house of God needed.
- Eye — God watched over the elders to protect them, not to inspect them from a distance. His eye gave them courage, shelter, and the sense of His presence while the enemy stood in front of them.
- Enemy — the attack came because the work was for God. The names of the opponents keep changing, but the one behind them does not.
- Restraint — the enemies could not make them stop. God held back the hand that wanted to halt the building, and the work went on through the whole investigation.
- Faith — the builders started again at the word of two prophets, not at a new permit from Persia. Faith took away their fear.
- Result — the hostile letter reached Darius, and back came both confirmation and funding. God turned the power aimed at them into their supply.
The copy of the letter that Tatnai, governor on this side the river, and Shethar-boznai, and his companions the Apharsachites, who were on this side the river, sent to Darius the king.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
They sent a report to him in which was written thus To Darius the king, all peace!
Work on the temple had restarted. The Persian officials who came to inspect it now put the question to King Darius in writing. This verse is the letter's opening line. Its polite greeting of peace comes from men who had the power to stop everything — yet their report would serve the very work they questioned.
The letter reports what the officials found in Jerusalem, and it repeats the answer the builders gave them:
Then Tatnai and his associates sent a letter to King Darius. It gives details of their visit to Jerusalem that we are not told elsewhere. Zerubbabel and his companions had answered Tatnai's questions like this: "We are the servants of the God of heaven and earth." So they bore witness to who they were. Then they told what had happened, and how Cyrus had made the decree to build the house of God… The builders must have had perfect peace about this letter, knowing that the LORD was with them.
An earlier letter about Jerusalem had already gone to a Persian king in a hostile tone. This one is different:
Tattenai then wrote a letter to King Darius. It was not hostile, like the one Rehum and his companions had written to Artaxerxes (ch. 4:12-16). He was simply asking whether what the Jews had told him was true. The message came from the governor of the region beyond the river (Tattenai), Shethar Boznai and their companions, the Persians beyond the River.
The men writing had every interest in halting the building. Yet what they set down was accurate, and their own words praise the workers:
They were clearly impressed with the work of the weak Jews, for they tell the king, "We went into the province of Judea, to the house of the great God, which is being built with great stones, and timber is laid in the walls, and this work goes on fast, and prospers in their hands." Unlike the letter in the earlier chapter, this one at least reports the facts faithfully. Both letters aimed to stop the work. Yet here the enemy testifies to the hard work and devotion of the builders.
Even the way these officials named Israel's God carries weight:
They did not consider the God of Israel as similar to one of the idols of the nations, but recognized Him as the great God. They put the whole matter in a restrained and fair way. They did not demand that the work be stopped. They only asked whether the king of Persia had permitted it.
The Jews had started building again before any new royal permission arrived. Their ground was the earlier decree of Cyrus:
How bold faith is! And God justifies the faith that He gives. This looked like a lack of respect for the royal authority. But in fact they had at least as good an authority for going on with the work. If Artaxerxes stops the building of the house here, Cyrus had already authorized the building of it… They go back to what Cyrus had commanded. They knew one of the great rules of the Persian kingdom well: the laws of the Medes and Persians did not change. It was Artaxerxes that had changed.
The opponents' plan failed completely:
So the adversaries were fully refuted and stopped in their evil work. The house of God received — I will not say a push forward, but — its completion. For the beautiful fact, as we have already seen, is that the Jews had faith to start building the house again before they got this fresh decree. "And the elders of the Jews built, and they prospered [not through the commandment of the king, but they prospered] through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet, and Zechariah the son of Iddo."
- Inquiry. The letter to Darius was measured and truthful, unlike the hostile complaint sent to Artaxerxes earlier.
- Testimony. It was written to question the work. Instead it recorded how hard the builders worked, and it called Israel's God "the great God."
- Authority. The Jews stood on the older decree of Cyrus. Persian law did not change, so their boldness was also their defence.
- Peace. The letter opens by wishing the king peace. The builders had the real thing, because the Lord was with them.
- Power. The work prospered through the prophets Haggai and Zechariah, not through the king's permission. The decree only confirmed what faith had already begun.
Be it known to the king that we went into the province of Judah, to the house of the great God, which is being built with great stones, and timber is laid in the walls, and this work is being carried on with diligence, and prospers in their hand.
Persian officials came to inspect the rebuilding at Jerusalem, and this verse opens their report to King Darius. What makes it remarkable is who is speaking: the men sent to check the work end up describing its size, its quality and its speed.
The letter places the temple in a province of the Persian empire. That one word shows how far Judah had fallen:
Ezra 5:8 speaks of the province of Judea. This shows how the land had passed under the control of a foreign power, and Nebuchadnezzar had destroyed the temple. The only bit of true godliness belonged to a small, weak group.
Building had stopped for years before this. One writer traces the real cause to the builders themselves, not to the royal ban:
The ban on building only came two reigns later. The Jews had already stopped building because they were afraid of their enemies (compare Ezra 4:4, 21, and Ezra 5:1, with Haggai 1:1-4; Haggai 2:15). And they did not start again because the king's decree reached them. They started again because they feared the LORD and did not fear the king's command, seeing Him who is invisible (Haggai 1:12-13)... the source of their weakness was that they had forgotten God.
The builders had started again without new permission from Persia. Faith went back to an older order from an earlier king:
How bold faith is! And God justifies the faith that He gives. This looked like a lack of respect for the royal authority. But in fact they had at least as good an authority for going on with the work. If Artaxerxes here stops the building of the house, Cyrus had already ordered it to be built. They did what was quite right. They treated what Artaxerxes brought in as an accident, a thing brought about by circumstances. They saw it as a command of the man himself, not of Persia. They go back to what Cyrus had commanded. They knew well that one of the great rules of the Persian kingdom was that the laws of the Medes and Persians did not change. It was Artaxerxes who had changed.
This letter is very different from the accusation sent in the previous chapter:
It is clear that the work of the feeble Jews impressed them, because they tell the king that the house of the great God "is being built with huge stones, and timber is laid in the walls. This work goes on diligently and prospers in their hands." Unlike the letter in the earlier chapter, this one at least reports the facts faithfully. Both letters aimed to stop the work. Yet here the enemy testifies to the diligence and devotion of the builders.
Notice the title these officials give to the God of Israel:
Their letter to Darius begins by reporting that the building of the temple of the great God at Jerusalem was moving fast (v. 8). They did not treat the God of Israel as just one more idol of the nations. They recognised Him as the great God. They put the whole matter in a restrained and fair way. They did not demand that the work stop. They only asked whether the king of Persia had allowed it.
The builders kept working while the inquiry went on. That was no accident:
But these enemies had not reckoned with the Keeper of Israel, who never sleeps or slumbers. They had no idea that what they were doing would lead to victory for God's people and would end with the house of God finished... God held Tatnai back from ordering the work to stop, so they kept right on working. Blessed are all the servants of the LORD who work hard in the fear of the LORD. They know that His eye is on them, and that He supports all who put their trust in Him.
- Subjected. Judah was only a district of a foreign empire. The one bit of real godliness in it belonged to a small, weak group.
- Stalled. The long halt came from fear of enemies and from forgetting God, not just from the royal ban.
- Stirred. Work restarted because the people feared God, not the king. They leaned on Cyrus's earlier order, and God justified that bold faith.
- Seen. The officials reported the facts honestly: huge stones, timber in the walls, hard work, success. The enemy testified to the builders' devotion.
- Sustained. God held the governor back, so the work went on. The enemy's own inquiry became the road to a finished temple.
Then asked we those elders thus we said to them, Who gave you orders to build this house and to complete this wall?
Ezra 5:9 sits inside a letter, not a conversation. Tattenai, the Persian governor, is reporting to King Darius, and he repeats to him the question about permission that he had already put to the builders in Jerusalem.
Nothing here is new to the men on site. The repetition is for the king, who now reads both the challenge and the reply.
Verses 9 and 10 repeat verses 3 and 4, so that the king is informed. Then in verses 11-16 we have the answer the Jewish elders gave to the men who questioned them. Nothing could be simpler or more beautiful than the way they tell their own history, and the history of the temple they were building.
The question itself was not unreasonable.
The governor was within his rights in asking this, and he was acting for his king, because a decree had already been issued forbidding the building of the city, if not of the temple. He could know of no command except his own king's. The people of this world can never understand God's claims on His people. It always looks like folly to them that anyone should risk a king's anger to please One they do not believe in themselves.
The names in this letter are not the names from the earlier attack, and they change again later.
One group of men follows another in their hatred of God's work, some more violent than others. But the opposition stays the same, because the enemy who uses all these tools has not changed. If only faith would never let the obstacles raised by Satan's agents stop it! If only we really understood that no one can destroy the work of God, because God remains over and above everything!
Under Darius the accusers change their approach. Their question about a decree is calculated.
The accusers of the Jews think they will touch the king where he is sensitive, by pointing to the building of the temple and to the religious interests of the kingdom. Did Cyrus really allow this rebuilding, as the Jews claim? The enemies hide their hostility behind a look of indifference and almost of tolerance. If the order Cyrus gave did not exist, or if no one could find it, they could expect the king to order the work to stop. Their one concern is to stay on good terms with the power of the world, because the name of God in fact means nothing to their hearts or consciences.
Asked for their authorisation, the elders gave two reasons — and the sequence matters.
Their opponents recorded that when they were challenged their answer had two parts, religious and political. They put the religious reason first, saying, "We are the servants of the God of heaven and earth", and they are building at His command. Second, they quoted the original permission they had received from Cyrus.
Their open confession was their strength, not their risk.
When we face Satan's tricks, there is no stronger weapon than boldly confessing what we really are. So it was a blessing that these Jews could take their stand on this open confession that they were God's servants. It was a blessing for their own souls, and it came, no doubt, from knowing that God's eye was on them. At the same time it fully justified them in starting their work despite the king's decree.
The same answer that names God as their Master admits their own guilt.
When their enemies call them to account like this, the people openly confess the name and character of their God. But they do it with no sense of being better than those around them. They do not try to make their guilt look small. Instead they own before the nations that they are under God's judgment. Today, as then, God asks His servants that their testimony, if it is to have any effect, be above all a testimony to their own ruin.
- Question. Tattenai repeats his on-site challenge to Darius, so the king has the facts in front of him.
- Right. The governor acted for his king and knew of no other command. The world cannot see why God's claim would outweigh a royal ban.
- Tactic. The names of the opponents change from reign to reign, but the opposition stays the same. Here it hides behind a polite question about a decree.
- Answer. The elders give two reasons, God first and Cyrus second. They are servants of the God of heaven and earth, building at His command.
- Humility. That bold confession carries no boast. They own before the nations that they are under God's judgment.
We asked their names also, to inform thee, that we might write the names of the men that were the chief of them.
Persian officials have come to inspect the rebuilding in Jerusalem, and they write down the names of its leaders for the king. Why did they want those names, and who exactly was asking?
In verse 4, "we" could belong to either side of the conversation. Verse 10 settles it.
Verse 4 is a little unclear. Compare it with verse 10, and it is plain that the "we" of verse 4 means the enemies of Israel. They were the ones who asked for the names of the men putting up the building. Their aim was to report these men to the king as breakers of his command. Satan is still working behind the scene. Whenever God acts on the earth through His people, Satan at once works against it. That is the force of the words "At the same time" in verse 3. We read of no persecution of the people in the time Haggai speaks of, when they were building their own houses. But as soon as they took up their work on the LORD's house again, they met new tactics — indeed, open opposition.
Tatnai was a governor doing his job. An earlier royal order had banned this building work.
The governor was within his rights to ask this question, and he was acting for his king, because an order had gone out banning the building of the city, if not of the temple. He could know of no command except his own king's. People of this world can never understand God's claims on His people. It always looks like folly to them that anyone should risk the anger of an earthly king to please One they themselves do not believe in.
The builders did not refuse the demand.
Judah had nothing to hide, and told them the names of the men who were supervising the work. They told them more than this also, as is reported in the letter that Tattenai sent to the king of Persia (vv. 7-16).
The letter these officials sent on to the king also shows how they wrote about Israel's God.
They did not think of the God of Israel as one of the idols of the nations. They recognised Him as the great God. Their account of the whole matter was calm and fair. They did not demand that the work be stopped. They asked whether the king of Persia allowed it.
The builders gave an answer of their own. It began with the God they served.
They tell their own history, and the history of the temple they were building, in the simplest and most beautiful way. Before anything else they call themselves "the servants of the God of heaven and earth." Against the tactics of Satan there is no stronger weapon than boldly confessing who we really are. Peter's fall began with his denial that he belonged to Jesus of Nazareth — or rather, that was its first outward step. And how often since that day has such a denial come before shame and defeat!
Names went into a report for the king. God's eye was on the same men.
But these enemies did not reckon with the Keeper of Israel who neither sleeps nor slumbers. Little did they know that what they were doing would lead to victory for God's people and would result in finishing the house of God. The eye of God was upon the elders of the Jews. He gave them strength, courage and assurance, so that they could persevere in the work. God was with them, and who then could be against them? God restrained Tatnai from giving order to suspend the work, so that they worked right on. Blessed are all the servants of the LORD who work in the fear of the LORD. They know His eye is upon them, and that He holds up all who trust Him.
So where does the real danger to God's people lie? Not outside.
Why should His people be troubled because of their enemies? What they have most to fear is themselves — that unbelief may open the door to the great foe, and that unjudged laziness, self-seeking, pride and jealousy may dishonour Him whose name they bear.
- Named to accuse. The opponents collected the names, not the builders. Verse 10 shows their aim: to report the workers to the king as lawbreakers.
- Named by law. Tatnai acted within his office. People who do not believe in God cannot see why anyone would risk a king's anger to please Him.
- Named openly. The builders hid nothing, giving both their leaders' names and their own account of the work.
- Named as servants. Their first word about themselves was that they served the God of heaven and earth. No weapon against the enemy is stronger.
- Named by God. God's eye was already on these elders. The report reached Darius, but the work went on. The real threat to such workers lies within.
And thus they returned us answer, saying, We are the servants of the God of the heavens and the earth, and build the house that was built these many years ago; and a great king of Israel built and completed it.
A Persian governor has come to Jerusalem and demanded to know who authorised the rebuilding of the temple. The elders answer by first naming whose they are. Then they tell the story of the house — who built it, why it fell, and why they are building again.
The first thing out of their mouths is not a permit but an identity. One writer calls that confession the strongest weapon a believer has when opposed.
Nothing could be simpler or more beautiful than the way they tell their own story and the story of the temple they were building. Right at the front of everything they declare themselves "the servants of the God of heaven and earth." Against Satan's schemes no weapon is stronger than a bold confession of our true character. The first outward step in Peter's fall was his denial that he belonged to Jesus of Nazareth. How often since that day has that denial led to shame and defeat! So it was a blessed thing that these Jews could take their stand on this open confession that they were God's servants.
Their reply has two halves, and the sequence matters. The decree of Cyrus is real, but it is not what they lead with.
Their opponents put on record that when challenged their answer was twofold: both religious and political. They put the religious reason first, saying, "We are the servants of the God of heaven and earth," and are building under His command. In the second place they quoted the original authorisation they had received from Cyrus.
They had not waited for permission. A ban stood against them, yet the work was going up, because God had spoken.
The reader should remember again that the people did not wait for the Gentile authorities to renew their commission to build. True, they were subject to the powers God ordained, and a decree forbidding them to build was in force. But God Himself had spoken. So if they were to give Caesar the things that are Caesar's, they were also to give God the things that are God's. When God stoops to speak, His claims come first. They stand above every other consideration, whatever the consequences. Builders of a later day held the same principle. When Peter and John were forbidden to speak or teach in the name of Jesus, they replied, "Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge, for we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard." (Acts 4:19-20.)
They do not dress up the past. They name the great king who built it, and in the next breath they name the sin that lost it and the king who tore it down.
What a history! Solomon had built the house, and Nebuchadnezzar had destroyed it, and the cause of all this sorrow was their fathers' sins. What a story of patient grace and mercy lies between those two dates! And what an exposure of the human heart, even though God Himself had cultivated it! Between those two points lies the history of the kingdom under man's responsibility. It was set up in glory and splendour under Solomon, the prince of peace. (David was the first king, but the building of the temple marked the establishment of the kingdom.) It was destroyed in the reign of weak and wicked Zedekiah.
Another writer sums up the reply as three admissions held together: service, discipline, and permission.
They served the God of heaven; they were under God's discipline because their fathers had sinned; and Cyrus had passed a decree entitling them to build.
The same confession turns up in a short account of Zerubbabel's work. Beside Cyrus's decree stands God's word about where the power would come from.
Jeshua the high priest helped Zerubbabel, and they began to build at once. The Persian governors questioned their authority for doing so. Their reply was a noble one: "We are the servants of the God of heaven and earth." Cyrus had made a decree that the temple should be built. But God's word to Zerubbabel was, "Not by might, nor by power, but by my Spirit, says the LORD of hosts."
- Servants first. Before any argument, they say whose they are. Confessing our true character openly is the strongest weapon against Satan's schemes.
- Order. Their answer was twofold: God's command first, Cyrus's decree second. The human authorisation was true, but it came after.
- Obedience. They had already started while the ban still stood. When God speaks, His claim outranks every other — the ground Peter and John took in Acts 4.
- Honesty. They hid nothing. Solomon built the house, their fathers' sins lost it, and Nebuchadnezzar tore it down. That ruin was God's discipline.
- Power. Cyrus gave the decree, but the word to Zerubbabel went further. The work would go forward by God's Spirit, not by might or power.
But after that our fathers had provoked the God of the heavens to wrath, he gave them into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, the Chaldean, and he destroyed this house, and carried the people away unto Babylon.
Persian officials demanded to know who had authorised the rebuilding of the temple. The Jews answered with history, and that history started with their own fathers' sin. Two questions follow. Why did God give His own house up to a destroyer? And why do they call Him "the God of heaven"?
The verse does not say Babylon overpowered Judah. It says God gave them into Nebuchadnezzar's hand. Scripture says little of the Chaldeans for centuries. Here they appear as God's instrument.
Scripture mentions Ur of the Chaldees (Genesis 11:28, 31; Genesis 15:7) and the Chaldeans who fell upon Job's camels (Job 1:17). After that we do not read of them for some fifteen hundred years. Then God sent them to punish Judah (2 Kings 24:2). By then you cannot tell them apart from the Babylonians. Scripture calls Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon a Chaldean (Ezra 5:12), and when he took Jerusalem it was the Chaldeans who destroyed the city.
This title belongs to a particular moment. God had forsaken Jerusalem, and no earthly throne there carried His government any longer.
God once gave the government of the earth to man, in the person of Nebuchadnezzar. It does not return to a throne that is only earthly, as it was at Jerusalem. Meanwhile the earthly power rebels against the Most High. In that setting the saints have taken on a character that comes from looking to heaven and to Him who reigns there. God, in His government of the earth, has taken the name of the God of heaven. Their position is easy to understand, since He had forsaken Jerusalem.
The verse compresses centuries into a single sentence. One builder, one destroyer, and one cause.
What a history! Solomon had built the house, and Nebuchadnezzar had destroyed it. The cause of all this sorrow was their fathers' sins. And what a story of patient grace and mercy fills the years between those two dates! It also shows what is in the heart of man, even under God's own care. Between those two points lies the whole history of the kingdom under man's responsibility. It rose in glory and splendour under Solomon as prince of peace… and it was destroyed in the reign of weak and wicked Zedekiah.
The Jews stood before hostile officials with every reason to defend themselves. Instead they admitted that they deserved the foreign rule they lived under.
The people do not try to make their guilt look smaller. They own before the nations that they are under God's judgment. They are "servants of the God of heaven and earth" (v. 11), and they confess that God punished them justly for their sins… Their subjection to the nations was His discipline for their iniquity (vv. 13-15). Does this attitude not also suit the guilty Church, responsible for what He entrusted to her? Today, as then, God asks His servants that their testimony be, above all, the testimony of their ruin, for that is what makes it effective.
Their enemies wrote the answer down and passed it on. The confession reaches us through the men who opposed them.
It is touching to hear, even from their enemies, how simply the Jews took their stand. They were servants of the God of heaven and earth, and they were building His house, built long ago by a great king of Israel. They owned the sins of their fathers, and those sins drew from God the destruction of that house and their captivity.
Nebuchadnezzar destroyed this house — the very one they were now rebuilding. One writer sees God looking at the Church, His Assembly, in the same way.
Despite the ruin, He still sees His Assembly as He wants her to be, even though the unfaithfulness of God's people has made her disappear altogether as a public testimony. Her existence, and even more her unity, are just as real — not to the eyes of the world, but to the eyes of God — as when she was built, like Solomon's temple, and grew into a holy temple in the Lord. It is the same house.
- Cause. The temple did not fall to superior force. Their fathers' sin provoked God, and He gave them into Nebuchadnezzar's hand.
- Instrument. God sent the Chaldeans, absent from the record for some fifteen hundred years, to punish Judah.
- Title. God takes the name "God of heaven" when no earthly throne at Jerusalem holds His government. He has forsaken the city, so His people look up.
- Confession. Facing their examiners, they owned their guilt. Testimony has power when it starts by admitting the ruin.
- Continuity. Built, destroyed, rebuilt — it is still "this house." What looks broken to the world is one house to God.
But in the first year of Cyrus king of Babylon, king Cyrus gave orders to build this house of God.
Officials had challenged the Jews over who authorised the rebuilding of the temple. The elders answered with history: Nebuchadnezzar destroyed this house, and Cyrus then ordered it rebuilt.
The elders gave a double answer, and the order matters. They named God before they named any king.
Their opponents recorded that when challenged their answer had two parts, religious and political. They put the religious reason first, saying, "We are the servants of the God of heaven and earth," and that they build at His command. Second, they quoted the original permission Cyrus had given them.
The title is not a mistake. It reflects who held Babylon at the time.
But they appealed also to an earthly authority, Cyrus king of Babylon. He was in fact king of Persia (ch.1:1), but since Persia had captured Babylon, Cyrus was king over Babylon too. In his first year, they said, Cyrus had issued a decree to build this house of God (v. 13). He also ordered that the gold and silver articles of the house of God be taken from Nebuchadnezzar's temple in Babylon and returned to Jerusalem.
"The first year of Cyrus" is more than a date in a royal archive. Long before that year, the king had been named in prophecy — and he appears to have known it.
The first year of Cyrus marks the end of the captivity, just as the first year of Nebuchadnezzar had marked its beginning. Cyrus takes up the restoration of the people and the temple. The Persian king knew his mission, and he knew what God had announced in advance about him through the prophets. Daniel was able to teach him these things. Isaiah had said: "He is my shepherd, and he shall fulfill all my purpose"; saying of Jerusalem, "She shall be built," and of the temple, "Your foundation shall be laid" (Isa. 44:28).
Notice the word the elders keep repeating: this house. Solomon built it, Nebuchadnezzar destroyed it, Cyrus decreed its rebuilding — and they treat all three as the same building.
God has brought back to light the truth that this house, the Church, the assembly of the living God, matters immensely to Christ. Despite the ruin, He still sees His Assembly as He desires her to be. She has vanished as a public testimony through the unfaithfulness of the people of God. Yet her existence, and even more her unity, are just as real as when she was built like Solomon's temple and grew into a holy temple in the Lord. They are real not to the eyes of the world, but to the eyes of God. It is the same house. In Ezra also (Ezra 5), the remnant looks at it in this way.
The decree came from a Persian king. That fact cleared the Jews even on human grounds.
They also explain that the work they were doing was the result of a decree of Cyrus. As proof, they told how he had handed into their care the gold and silver vessels of the temple, which Nebuchadnezzar had taken away. (vv. 13-15.) ... If the account the Jews gave was correct, they were fully justified even in the eyes of man. It was a well-known feature of the laws of the Medes and Persians (and Cyrus was king of Persia) that no one could change them (Dan. 6:8, 14, 15, etc.). Their opponents, then, were in error because they did not know the law.
The appeal to Darius was meant to stop the work. It funded it instead.
To faith it was clear that God was working behind the scenes, using the power of the enemy to carry out His own purposes. Here is another instance of how He causes all things to work together for good to those who love Him. When their adversaries stepped in, Darius not only confirmed the decree of Cyrus; he also issued another decree, that every provision needed for the house of God should be made at his own expense.
- Order — Their defence named God first and the king second: servants of the God of heaven and earth, and only then holders of Cyrus's decree.
- Date — The decree fell in Cyrus's first year, which ended the captivity as Nebuchadnezzar's first year had begun it.
- Prophecy — Behind the decree stood God's word: Cyrus knew the mission God had announced through the prophets.
- One house — The decree rebuilt the house Solomon built and Nebuchadnezzar destroyed; the Church too is one house in God's eyes despite the ruin.
- Result — No one could change a Persian decree, so the complaint backfired: Darius confirmed Cyrus's word and paid for the work.
And the vessels also of gold and silver of the house of God, which Nebuchadnezzar took out of the temple that was at Jerusalem and brought into the temple of Babylon, those did king Cyrus take out of the temple of Babylon, and they were delivered to one Sheshbazzar by name, whom he had appointed governor.
This verse sits inside a letter, not a story. The officials who wanted the building work stopped are repeating what the Jews told them. The whole defence rested on the history of the temple vessels. Nebuchadnezzar seized them. They sat in an idol's temple. Then Cyrus handed them back to a man named Sheshbazzar.
This reply reaches us through the Jews' own enemies. One writer notes how much the Jews confessed in it.
It is moving to hear, even from their enemies, how simply the Jews took their stand. They were servants of the God of heaven and earth. They were building His house, which a great king of Israel had built long ago. They admitted the sins of their fathers, the sins that drew out from God its destruction and their captivity. And they said that Cyrus the king, the conqueror of Babylon and the greatest figure in Persian eyes, made a decree in the first year of his reign to build this house of God. He handed over the sacred vessels that Nebuchadnezzar took away to Sheshbazzar the governor of the Jews, to put them back in the house once it was rebuilt.
The handover of the vessels was their evidence. It proved a royal decree existed, and Persian law made that decisive.
They also explain that the work they were doing came out of a decree of Cyrus. As proof, they told how he had put into their care the gold and silver vessels of the temple, which Nebuchadnezzar had taken away. (vv. 13-15.) If the account the Jews gave was correct, they were fully justified even in the eyes of man. It was a well-known feature of the laws of the Medes and Persians — and Cyrus was king of Persia — that no one could change them.
Babylon carried the Jews away in three separate deportations. One writer asks why God dated the seventy years from the first and smallest of them.
The last of these three deportations was the most serious in terms of the damage done. The temple was burnt, and huge numbers went into captivity. But the seventy years of captivity start from the first deportation, the one we would call relatively unimportant. Why was that first one the important one in God's eyes? It is because of the vessels. Nebuchadnezzar took the vessels of the temple to Babylon, and even put them in the house of his idols. Such a thing had never happened before.
Take away the vessels and the worship stops. The same writer draws the line from Babylon to today.
Without vessels, they could not bring the sacrifices God had laid down. No vessels, no worship! This is the tragedy. Does it not remind us of something sad? In much of the Christian world the very idea of worship, and above all worship together, has disappeared.
The verse names where the vessels ended up: an idol's temple. Babylon read that as a verdict on whose God was stronger.
God had allowed His people to go into captivity. He had allowed His temple to be destroyed, and the holy vessels to be carried to Babylon and put in the house of the Chaldean idol (Dan. 1:2). The Babylonian kings did not see God's correcting hand on His people. They saw this victory over Israel as the triumph of their gods over the God of Israel.
Yet the vessels never lost their character while they were in exile.
The holy vessels were still holy in God's eyes, no matter how badly the sins of His kings and priests had defiled them. They had been used in the house where He had put His name for ever, and where His eyes and His heart would always be (1 Kings 9:3).
One writer identifies Sheshbazzar with Zerubbabel, under the name Babylon gave him.
No doubt Cyrus had these vessels collected and carefully guarded. Mithredath the treasurer handed them to Sheshbazzar the prince of Judah. This prince was Zerubbabel. Sheshbazzar was the name the Babylonians had given him. He was born in Babylon, and his name means "stranger in Babylon." He became the royal leader of the exiles who went home. All of this shows that God had not forgotten His people. When His appointed time came, He showed His power on their behalf.
- Seized — Nebuchadnezzar put the holy vessels in an idol's house. No one had ever done that before, and the seventy years of captivity start from that raid, not from the burning of the temple.
- Silenced — without the vessels the people could not offer the sacrifices God had laid down. The real tragedy was lost worship, not a lost building.
- Kept — Babylon's kings treated the vessels as proof their gods had beaten Israel's God. In God's eyes the vessels stayed holy the whole time.
- Restored — Cyrus handed the vessels to Sheshbazzar. That handover proved a decree existed, and no one could revoke a Persian decree, so even human law backed the builders.
- Remembered — the whole transfer shows God had not forgotten His people. When His time came, He acted for them through a man whose name meant "stranger in Babylon."
And he said to him, Take these vessels, go, carry them into the temple that is at Jerusalem, and let the house of God be built in its place.
Years earlier, King Cyrus handed back the temple treasures Babylon had taken, and he sent an order with them. The Jews now quote that order as their defence: the vessels go back into the house, and the house goes back up on its own site.
The gold and silver named here were not new. One writer shows how far their treatment in Babylon went beyond every earlier loss:
Under Jehoiachin, Nebuchadnezzar plundered all the treasures of the house of God on a far greater scale. He smashed the vessels which Solomon had made, according to the commandment of the Lord. But, I repeat, this was a dishonour with no earlier parallel. Only under Jehoiachin did anyone decorate a temple of idols with the vessels designed for the worship service of the true God.
So Cyrus's order reversed that dishonour. Vessels that had decorated an idol's temple would stand again in God's house.
What moved Cyrus was not politics. And what came back was not everything:
It was not policy but Jehovah that stirred up the spirit of Cyrus, as He did that of the chief fathers of the Jews. The conqueror of Babylon proclaimed something like a jubilee to the captives. But he said plainly why: to build Jehovah's house in Jerusalem... The holy vessels were counted and restored, as far as was fitting, for Jehovah's house in Jerusalem. The ark, the centre, the highest in value, the nearest to the glory, was not there. Sadly, the glory itself had withdrawn. But in the day that the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, no more to leave.
Cyrus did not just allow a temple. He named where it must stand, and God had already chosen that place:
Jerusalem was the place God had chosen, out of all places. Deuteronomy 12 makes the point again and again: Jerusalem was "the place which the Lord your God shall choose out of all your tribes to put his name there." Only in this place could the temple stand. Only here could the people assemble, keep the national feasts, offer the sacrifices, and bring their gifts. And it was in this place that the people would rejoice before the Lord.
Ruins do not cancel that choice. One writer contrasts these returned exiles with people who pick their own spot:
Everyone chooses his own base for setting up his altar. The excuse is that the true temple has been destroyed, so we are free to choose the place which suits us best. This was not the case with these faithful souls. They knew the place of the temple, of the court, of the altar, and it was at that place and none other that they built... They wanted no other place. They knew of no other place than that one, in days of ruin just as in Israel's most prosperous days.
One writer draws a wider lesson. God still counts His Assembly — His church — as one house, and the remnant in Ezra saw their building the same way:
Despite the ruin, He sees His Assembly as He wants her to be. That is still true even though she has completely disappeared as a public testimony, through the unfaithfulness of the people of God... It is the same house. In Ezra also (Ezra 5), the remnant considers it from this point of view: "We... build the house that was built many years ago; and a great king of Israel built and completed it"... And: "Cyrus gave orders to build this house of God."
The builders' reply was not clever politics. They told what had happened, and pointed to Cyrus's own command as proof:
They explain that they were doing this work because Cyrus had decreed it. As proof, they told how he had put into their care the vessels of gold and silver belonging to the temple, which Nebuchadnezzar had taken away. (vv. 13-15)... If the account given by the Jews was correct, they were entirely justified even in the eyes of man. The laws of the Medes and Persians were well known for one thing: no one could change them. And Cyrus was king of Persia.
- Taken — Babylon stripped these vessels from God's house and used them to decorate an idol's temple. No earlier king had gone that far.
- Returned — Cyrus's order sent them home again. Yet not all came back: the ark was missing. One day the glory itself will return and never leave.
- Placed — the house had to rise on its own site. God had chosen one place for His name, and ruin gives no licence to pick another.
- Unbroken — the remnant did not build a replacement. An earlier king had finished this house, an enemy had destroyed it, and they were raising the same house again.
- Defended — no one could change a Persian law. So the builders' plain account of history justified them even in human eyes.
Then came the same Sheshbazzar, [and] laid the foundation of the house of God which is at Jerusalem; and since that time even until now has it been in building, and it is not completed.
The elders end their report to the Persian officials with a plain fact. The man Cyrus appointed laid the foundation, and the house still stands unfinished. Their words are both a legal defence and an honest confession.
Writers identify the Sheshbazzar of this report with a leader the same book names in Hebrew:
Zerubbabel (the name means sown in Babylon) came from the royal line, a direct descendant of David. In Ezra this royal leader goes by his Persian name, Sheshbazzar.
The report traces his authority back to Cyrus, along with the temple vessels:
In his first year, they said, Cyrus had issued a decree to build this house of God (v. 13). He also ordered that the gold and silver articles of the house of God be brought back from Nebuchadnezzar's temple in Babylon to Jerusalem. Cyrus put these things in the care of a man named Sheshbazzar, whom he had made governor. This governor came to Jerusalem and laid the foundation of the temple (v. 14).
The temple Solomon built, the temple Nebuchadnezzar destroyed, and the temple now going up are one house. That is how Scripture treats it:
Whatever destruction this house suffered, and however complete that destruction seemed — like the destruction Nebuchadnezzar carried out — the Word always treats it as the house. It has one history only, one existence in the eyes of God, through all its stages of building or ruin. Rebuilt, it is not a new temple in God's eyes, but the same temple with different glories.
So Sheshbazzar did not invent a foundation. He uncovered the one already there:
In the time of the book of Ezra, as today, the foundation could not be new. After centuries of abandonment it came to light again and was laid down as the only foundation able to carry the house, the Assembly of God.
Their report packs the whole history of the house into a few lines. Admitting the work was unfinished was also their strongest legal ground:
What a history! Solomon had built the house, and Nebuchadnezzar had destroyed it, and the cause of all this sorrow was their fathers' sins… They added, "Then this Sheshbazzar came and laid the foundations of the house of God that is in Jerusalem, and from that time until now it has been in building, and it is not yet finished" (v. 16). If the account the Jews gave was correct, they were fully justified even in the eyes of man. It was a well-known feature of the laws of the Medes and Persians (and Cyrus was king of Persia) that no one could change them (Dan. 6:8, 14, 15, etc.), and their opponents proved to be in the wrong through ignorance of the law.
The people in Ezra's day stayed conscious of their ruin. That consciousness belongs to God's people still:
The consciousness of our ruin should mark us today, as it marked the people in the times of Ezra. We cannot and should not deny it or shrug its burden off our shoulders. Instead we must bear the humiliation of this ruin, while we set the house of God back on its only real foundation, Christ, with the apostles and prophets who gave witness to Him.
The house is still going up. Rossier applies that to the church now:
It is in no way a question of building a new Church. She already exists, built by God Himself, and grows into a holy temple in the Lord… But God expects His people to make her visible to all, by bringing materials suitable for her construction… each witness of Christ is responsible to bring noble and living material to the house of God. Our unfaithfulness has scattered these materials instead of gathering them, so that only the eyes of God can see them.
The verse stops at "not finished," but the story does not:
God also decreed that "The hands of Zerubbabel have laid the foundation of this house; and his hands shall finish it." No opposition from the great of this world can frustrate what God has set Himself to do. It may be a "day of small things," which God's people tend to despise. But the faithful will see that the outward appearance does not show the true value of the work of God.
- Foundation. Sheshbazzar is the Persian name of Zerubbabel, of David's line. Cyrus gave him the vessels and the work of laying the foundation.
- Same house. However complete the ruin, God counts the rebuilt temple as the same house, with different glories.
- Relaid. The foundation could not be new. It came to light again after long abandonment, because only Christ can carry the house.
- Unfinished. They admitted the delay, and that honesty became their defence. It rested on a decree of the Medes and Persians that no one could change.
- Finished. The hands that laid the foundation will finish it. Opposition cannot frustrate what God has set Himself to do, even in a day of small things.
And now, if it seem good to the king, let search be made in the king's treasure-house, which is there at Babylon, whether it be so, that orders were given by king Cyrus to build this house of God at Jerusalem; and let the king send his pleasure to us concerning this matter.
The letter to King Darius ends with a request, not an accusation. It asks him to search the royal records and then say what he wants done. The future of the temple work now hangs on one old document — and on the God who kept it.
The closing request is narrower and fairer than the demand made in an earlier complaint against Jerusalem.
So their request to the king was not that he should find out whether Jerusalem was a rebellious city. That had been the charge of Rehum and Shimshai earlier (ch. 4:12-16). Their request was that he should find whether the records showed a command of Cyrus to rebuild the temple, and that the king would tell them his own mind about this matter (v. 17).
Edward Dennett compares this letter with the earlier one. The difference is in accuracy, not in motive.
Unlike the letter in the earlier chapter, this one at least reports the facts truthfully. But both letters had the same aim: to stop the work going forward. And here the enemy himself testifies to the builders' hard work and devotion.
The letter went off to the king. Arno Clemens Gaebelein says the builders had no reason to worry about it:
The builders must have had perfect peace about this letter, knowing that the LORD was with them.
The adversaries themselves asked for the search. That request is what sank their case.
It is also striking that the new adversaries are the ones asking for a search in the archives. As we shall see, that search proved them wrong. It also confirmed God's people in the faith that had grown out of the testimony of His servants. Why should His people be troubled because of adversaries? They have most to fear from themselves. Unbelief may open the door to the great enemy, and laziness, self-seeking, pride and jealousy, if left unjudged, dishonour Him Whose name they bear.
Michael Hardt names what the opponents were after, and what became of their plan:
The opponents had written to Darius with one final goal: to stop the building of the temple and the city. But their plan backfires.
Gaebelein describes the search Darius ordered, and where it led:
King Darius ordered a search in the place where the records of the empire were kept, "in the house of the rolls." The word "rolls" means "books", and these were clay tablets with cuneiform writing on them. The searchers found the record they wanted at Achmetha (called Ecbatana by Greek writers, the capital city of Media, and the modern Hamadan). God's providence had preserved this interesting command of Cyrus, and the same providence guided the searchers to the place where it lay.
The letter asked only whether permission existed. The answer gave permission and money.
To faith it was clear that God was working behind the scenes. He was using the power of the enemy to carry out His own purposes. Here is another example of how He causes all things to work together for good to those who love Him. When their adversaries stepped in, Darius did more than confirm the decree of Cyrus. He issued a second decree, ordering that his own treasury cover everything the house of God needed.
William Kelly draws the practical line: the builders never lobbied Darius, and neither should we manage the powers above us.
Our business is not to set one king against another. It is to go forward in the name of the Lord, taking His word as our full warrant. As we seek God's guidance, we can be fully sure of this: it is God's part to guide all men and all circumstances. That is His work, not ours. In short, our part is to go on in faith. He knows how to deal with those who oppose us.
- Ask — The letter ends by asking Darius to check the records for Cyrus's decree and to say what he wants. It does not repeat the earlier charge that Jerusalem was a rebellious city.
- Aim — This letter reports the facts truthfully, but its goal matched the earlier one: to stop the work. Even so, the enemy ends up testifying to the builders' devotion.
- Kept — God had preserved Cyrus's decree, and He led the searchers to Achmetha, where it lay. The opponents' own plan backfired.
- More — Darius did not just confirm the old permission. He ordered the royal treasury to cover the costs of God's house. God used the power of the enemy to serve His own purpose.
- Our part — The builders had peace about this letter because they knew the Lord was with them. Our part is to go forward on the warrant of God's word. Handling kings and circumstances is His work, not ours.
Then king Darius gave orders, and search was made in the house of the rolls, where the treasures were laid up in Babylon.
Darius was asked to check whether Cyrus had truly authorised the rebuilding of the temple, so the king ordered a search of the royal records. The question this verse raises is not whether the record existed, but who guided the searchers to it.
The place searched was the empire's records office, and the "rolls" were not paper. One writer explains both the material and the destination of the search:
The word "rolls" is "books" and these consisted of clay tablets on which the cuneiform inscriptions were preserved. Neither the Aramaic nor the Hebrew language has a word for clay tablets. Whole libraries of such clay tablets have turned up at Nineveh and other places. You can see them in museums today. The searchers found the record they wanted at Achmetha. Greek writers call it Ecbatana; it was the capital city of Media, and it is the modern Hamadan. Divine providence had preserved this interesting command of Cyrus. The same providence guided the searchers to the place where it was kept.
The search began in Babylon. The document turned up somewhere else entirely — and that detail carries weight:
In all this, we can see the providence of God, watching over His people. The edict of Cyrus turns up at Achmetha, in the province of the Medes, and not at Babylon (v. 2). This proves that without divine intervention even the most careful research would have been in vain.
The search was not the Jews' idea. Their adversaries interfered — and that interference became the means of their blessing:
To faith, God was clearly working behind the scenes. He was using the power of the enemy to accomplish His own purposes. Here is another instance of how He causes all things to work together for good to them that love Him. When their adversaries interfered, Darius did not only confirm the decree of Cyrus. He also issued another decree: everything the house of God needed was to be provided at his own expense.
The recovered decree did more than permit the work:
Once they discovered the original decree of Cyrus, it proved fuller in its details and more favourable to the Jews than their adversaries had imagined. It demanded that no one hinder them — and more, that they be actively helped in their work and supplied with what they needed. It also demanded that all who set themselves to hinder or destroy should themselves be destroyed, and their houses made a rubbish heap.
The building had stopped years earlier. Permission was not the problem; faith was. The order of events matters: they built again while a decree still stood against them, and the king's search came after.
All this shows us that Israel was at fault in stopping the building of the temple… The adversaries had filled the Jews with terror, and that terror had stopped them. They had no excuse for this, since even the king's commandment was on their side. What they lacked was faith in God. We have seen that, when there was faith, they dared to build, although there was a decree against it. The effect of this faith was a decree in their favour — and it came through the intervention of their adversaries. It is good to trust in God.
Darius had his own reasons for reaching back to Cyrus. One writer draws a practical lesson from them:
He had the greatest regard and reverence for Cyrus as the founder of the empire. He had a desire to restore all the institutions of Cyrus… So God knows how to redirect and arrange everything. Our business is not to set one king against another, but to go forward in the name of the Lord. We take His word as our full warrant. As we seek God's guidance, we can be perfectly sure of this: it is God's part to guide all men and all circumstances. That is His work, not ours. Our part, in short, is to go on in faith. He knows how to deal with those that oppose us.
- Fear stopped. Terror of their enemies stopped the work. The king's own command was already on the builders' side, so the failure was a lack of faith, not a lack of permission.
- Faith built. They built again while the opposition was still unanswered. That faith gave rise to a decree in their favour, delivered through their own adversaries.
- God searched. The adversaries triggered the search, yet the scroll lay in Media, not Babylon. Without God's hand the most careful search would have found nothing.
- Kings supplied. The recovered decree was fuller than the adversaries imagined: protection, active help, supplies — and Darius added that the cost would come from his own treasury.
- We go forward. Guiding kings and circumstances is God's work, not ours. Our part is to take His word as our warrant and keep building.
And there was found at Achmetha in the fortress that is in the province of Media a roll, and therein was a record thus written
Hostile officials asked Darius to check the royal records, and the search started in Babylon — but the scroll turned up hundreds of miles away, in a fortress in Media. Commentators see God's hand in that detail: the one document that could save the work lay where no one thought to look.
The record was not in Babylon. One writer shows how much hangs on that:
In all this we can see the providence of God, watching over His people. The decree of Cyrus is found at Achmetha, in the province of the Medes, and not at Babylon (v. 2). That proves one thing: without God stepping in, even the most careful search would have come to nothing.
The roll itself was not paper, as we might picture it:
The word "rolls" means "books," and these were clay tablets that carried the cuneiform writing. Neither the Aramaic nor the Hebrew language has a word for clay tablets. Whole libraries of such clay tablets have turned up at Nineveh and other places, and you can see them today in various museums. The searchers found the record they wanted at Achmetha — the Ecbatana of the Greek writers, the capital city of Media, and the modern Hamadan. God's providence had kept this interesting command of Cyrus safe, and the same providence guided the searchers to the place where it lay.
A reference work on Bible places notes that the word has been read in more than one way, and says why the royal papers lay there:
This reads in the margin, "Ecbatana, or, in a coffer." Ezra 6:2. The Greek translation does not treat it as a proper name: there the passage reads, "And there was found in the city, in the palace, a volume." The modern Hamadan was in ancient times the summer home of the Persian kings, and the records of the kingdom seem to have been kept there. This is most probably the Achmetha of scripture.
The enemies themselves set this search in motion:
The opponents had written to Darius with the ultimate goal of stopping the building of the temple and of the city. But their strategy backfires.
One writer sees a wider pattern in it:
To faith, God was plainly at work behind the scenes, using the power of the enemy to carry out His own purposes. Here is one more instance of how He makes all things work together for good to those who love Him.
The scroll said more than the Jews' enemies had bargained for:
Once the original decree of Cyrus came to light, it proved to be fuller in its details and more favourable to the Jews than their adversaries had imagined. It demanded that no one hinder them. More than that, it demanded that people help them in their work and supply what they needed. And it demanded that all who set out to hinder or destroy should themselves be destroyed, and their houses made a rubbish heap.
Darius had his own reason to honour anything that carried the name of Cyrus. One writer draws a lesson from it:
Darius was always ready to act on what Cyrus had done. He had the greatest regard and reverence for Cyrus as the founder of the empire... So God knows how to steer and arrange everything. Our business is not to set one king against another, but to go forward in the name of the Lord. We take His word as our full authority, sure that as we seek God's guidance, it is God's part to guide all men and all circumstances. That is His work, not ours.
The found roll mattered — but it never held first rank in the story:
The authority of the great king came on the scene only to confirm God's word and His servants, and to force respect and help out of those who had tried to hinder. What an encouragement to look above the hills to Him who sits in the heavens!
- Searched. The hunt started in Babylon and found nothing. The roll lay at Achmetha in Media. Without God's hand in it, the most careful search would have come up empty.
- Preserved. Providence kept the clay-tablet record safe for years. The same providence steered the searchers to the shelf that held it.
- Reversed. The enemies called for the search to end the work. God used the power of the enemy to carry out His own purposes.
- Exceeded. The decree went further than the enemies expected: not just leave the Jews alone, but supply them, and punish anyone who blocks the work.
- Subordinate. Cyrus's roll and Darius's reply only confirmed God's word and His servants. Look above the hills to Him who sits in the heavens.
In the first year of king Cyrus, king Cyrus made a decree [concerning] the house of God at Jerusalem Let the house be built for a place where they offer sacrifices, and let its foundations be solidly laid; its height sixty cubits, its breadth sixty cubits,
Buried in a Persian archive lay a scroll that decided the fate of God's house. Darius ordered a search. What turned up was not fresh permission but Cyrus's original order, with the temple's purpose, foundations and measurements already set down.
The Jews had claimed that Cyrus authorised the work. The scroll proved them right, and gave them more.
The king, when appealed to, ordered a search, and they found the decree of Cyrus (Ezra 6:1-5). This confirmed the statement of the Jews in every particular, and even more. They now discovered that Cyrus had not only issued his decree for the rebuilding of the temple. He had also ordered "the expenses to be given out of the king's house," as well as directed the restoration of the sacred vessels which Nebuchadnezzar had taken away.
The scroll did not surface in Babylon, where the search began. And it was a foreign king who fixed the height and width of God's house.
In all this, we can see the providence of God, watching over His people. The edict of Cyrus is found at Achmetha, in the province of the Medes and not at Babylon (v. 2). This proves that, without God stepping in, even the most careful research would have been in vain… Darius does acknowledge the God of heaven, and he recognises the temple at Jerusalem as the house of God (Ezra 6:9-10, 3, 7, 8). He decrees dimensions which his own intelligence selects, because they no longer match the symbolic figures of the early temple (v. 3; 1 Kings 6:2). So more than one thought from the mind of God remains as though buried beneath the new figures.
Commentators differ on how the new measurements relate to Solomon's building. Rossier sees a break with the old pattern. Others think the size was much the same, and the record just tells us little.
Few particulars of this are given. Cyrus ordered the foundations to be laid firmly, with a height of sixty cubits and a breadth of sixty cubits (Ezra 6:3). It was probably the same size as the temple Solomon built. The sixty cubits of breadth here may be its "length," with its width not mentioned. Or, if the sixty cubits is the width, it may have included the chambers. It is not probable that it was larger than the first temple.
The decree names the house by what happened inside it. That purpose reached only so far.
The temple was the centre of worship. One approached God in His temple by means of sacrifices and the priesthood. Still, God remained out of reach. In actual fact, man in the flesh could not approach Him. The way into the holiest place was shown in picture form, but it was not yet made open. Only the work of Christ was able to open this up.
The returned exiles were building to a foreign king's measurements. They could have despised the result. God's view ran the other way.
Their efforts may have been weak. The building may have looked poor and different in the eyes of men. But in God's eyes it was wonderful. He saw the feelings of their hearts. He noted the obedience towards His Word in their hearts, and that was well-pleasing to Him. That is why He encourages them. He shows them that in His eyes it is the same Temple as the one Solomon built. He shows them too that the final glory of this House would be greater than the first. Solomon's temple, Zerubbabel's temple, Herod's temple and the temple in the Millennium (Ezek. 40-43) are, in His eye, one and the same. There is only one House of God.
For a time the work had stood still. Fear of their opponents, not any lack of permission, had stopped it.
It appears from Haggai (Hag. 2:15) that they had made no progress at all. The terror with which the adversaries had inspired the Jews had stopped them. They had no excuse for this, since even the king's commandment was on their side. What they lacked was faith in God. We have seen that, when there was faith, they dared to build, although there was a decree against it. The effect of this faith was a decree in their favour, and that even through the action of their opponents. It is good to trust in God.
- Found. The decree surfaced at Achmetha in Media, not in Babylon where the search began. Without God's hand in it, the most careful search would have failed.
- Confirmed. The scroll backed the builders' claim on every point, and added more: Cyrus had ordered his own treasury to pay, and the stolen vessels returned.
- Defined. The decree names the house by its purpose: sacrifices. That was how people came near to God, until Christ's work opened the way in.
- Measured. Sixty cubits high and wide. Commentators differ: some see the size of Solomon's house, others see a foreign king's figures put in place of God's symbolic ones.
- Valued. It looked poor to men. God counted it the same temple as Solomon's, with a final glory greater than the first.
[with] three rows of great stones, and a row of new timber; and let the expenses be given out of the king's house
Darius ordered a search of the royal records, and the lost decree of Cyrus came to light. This verse is part of what it said: how the walls were to rise, and why a Persian empire paid for the house of God.
This verse survived because someone filed it away and someone else went looking. One writer explains what those royal records were, and who steered the search.
The word "rolls" means "books," and these were clay tablets with cuneiform writing on them... The searchers found the record they wanted at Achmetha... God's providence had preserved this command of Cyrus, and the same providence guided the searchers to the place where it lay. From it we learn interesting details. Cyrus gave instructions about the foundations, the height and the width of the building, and the costs were to come from the King's house — that is, the royal treasury. Persian kings controlled the religious affairs of the nation, but Cyrus acted under the divine guidance of the LORD.
The same layered pattern of stone and wood appears in the court of Solomon's temple. A writer on that passage says both the picture and its meaning are hard to pin down.
The court surrounding the temple had a fence of three rows of cut stone and a row of cedar beams. It may be hard to picture just what this means, and its spiritual meaning may be just as hard to work out.
When challenged, the builders had said Cyrus gave them permission. The search produced the document itself.
This confirmed what the Jews had said, down to every detail, and more besides. Cyrus had not only issued his decree for rebuilding the temple. He had also ordered "the expenses to be given out of the king's house," and he had directed the return of the sacred vessels that Nebuchadnezzar took away.
The whole search began with a hostile letter meant to shut the work down.
The opponents had written to Darius with the aim of stopping the building of the temple and the city. But their strategy backfires. Through God's providence, the old decree of King Cyrus comes to light at Achmetha... This decree also stated that the king's treasure should pay the costs of the project. The attack on the work ends up helping it forward.
The same writer sees God's hand behind the reversal.
To faith it was clear that God was working behind the scenes. He was using the power of the enemy to accomplish His own purposes. This is one more instance of how He causes all things to work together for good to those who love Him.
Two authorities stand behind this work: a king's decree and God's commandment. One writer puts them in order.
So the authority of the great king came on the scene only to confirm God's word and His servants, and to force respect and help from those who had tried to hinder... The commandment of the God of Israel held its rightful first place, and the decrees of Cyrus, Darius, and Artaxerxes came second.
The building described here is modest next to Solomon's. One writer compares the two houses and asks what the Lord makes of the smaller one.
Solomon, in his day, built the house with power and wealth, and no one opposed him. Some among the people could still remember the glory of that house. Now a small remnant is called to build the house in poverty and weakness, facing opposition and reproach. The work of this feeble remnant may look "as nothing" next to the former glory of the house. Even so, they were doing the LORD'S work according to the LORD'S mind in a day of ruin. And so it is a work in which the LORD can take pleasure.
- Attack — enemies wrote to Darius to stop the building. Their letter set off the search that funded it instead.
- Archive — the decree lay on a clay tablet at Achmetha. God's providence kept it safe and guided the searchers to it.
- Account — the decree said more than the builders had claimed. The king's house would pay, and the temple vessels would come back.
- Authority — the kings' decrees only confirmed the work. God's commandment held first place.
- Acceptance — this house was modest next to Solomon's. It was still the Lord's work done His way, and He can take pleasure in it.
and also let the golden and silver vessels of the house of God, which Nebuchadnezzar took out of the temple that is at Jerusalem and brought to Babylon, be restored and brought again to the temple that is at Jerusalem, in their place; and thou shalt put [them] in the house of God.
Darius ordered a search of the royal archives, and the officials found the original decree of Cyrus, word for word. Verse 5 is the part about the gold and silver vessels Nebuchadnezzar had carried off: they were to go back to the house of God in Jerusalem, each to its place.
The scroll did not turn up in Babylon, where anyone would have looked for it. And the Persian king who read it called the temple in Jerusalem the house of God.
In all this, we can see the providence of God, watching over His people. The decree of Cyrus is found at Achmetha, in the province of the Medes, and not at Babylon (v. 2). This proves that without God stepping in, even the most careful search would have come to nothing. Darius does acknowledge the God of heaven, and he recognizes the temple at Jerusalem as the house of God.
Opponents of the work had asked Darius for this search, hoping to end the building. The record they asked for backed the builders instead. It gave them more than they had claimed for themselves.
The statement of the Jews was confirmed in every detail, and even more. It now came to light that Cyrus had not only issued his decree for the rebuilding of the temple. He had also ordered that the costs be paid out of the king's house, and he had directed that the sacred vessels Nebuchadnezzar took away be restored.
Three waves of exile struck Jerusalem. The worst damage came in the last one, yet God dated the seventy years from the first.
This matter of the vessels is very important. There had been three deportations... The last of the three did the most damage: the temple was burnt, and huge numbers went into captivity. But the 70 years of captivity count from the first deportation, the one we would call minor. Why was this first one the important one in God's eyes? Well, it's because of the vessels. Nebuchadnezzar took the vessels of the temple to Babylon, and even put them in the house of his idols. Such a thing had never happened before.
Earlier kings had stripped silver from the temple to pay off invaders. Putting the holy vessels into an idol's temple was a different kind of act.
Under Jehoiachin, Nebuchadnezzar plundered, in a much greater measure, all the treasures of the house of God and smashed the vessels which Solomon had made, according to the commandment of the Lord, but, I repeat, this was an unprecedented profanation: the ornamentation of a temple of idols with the vessels designed for the worship service of the true God.
The decree does more than send back valuables. Without these vessels, the rebuilt house could not do the one thing it was for.
Without vessels, it was impossible to bring the sacrifices as the law required. No vessels, no worship! This is the tragedy. Does it not remind us of a sad fact? In wide parts of the Christian world the very idea of worship, and especially of worship together, has been lost. Concerts, performances, and all kinds of things have taken the place of meetings for worship.
Even a full return left a gap. The most precious object in the house was not on the list.
They counted the holy vessels and gave them back, as far as was proper, for the Lord's house in Jerusalem. The ark was not there — the centre, the most valuable of all, the one nearest to the glory. Sadly, the glory itself had already left. But on the day when the salvation of Israel comes out of Zion, the glory will return, never to leave again.
The returned exiles had cause for joy and cause for tears at the same time. Writers apply that mixture to Christians now.
There is much ruin, our numbers are few, and so on. But the altar is there (we can worship). The new moon is there (we can give some light). The feast of Tabernacles is there (we have a heavenly position to enjoy). And the foundation of the house of God is there (we can gather to the Lord's name). Truths that had been forgotten for centuries have been rediscovered from God's Word.
after-check: meaning unchanged
- Loss. God dated the captivity from the deportation that carried off the vessels, not from the burning of the temple. What happened to the holy things counted most with Him.
- Record. The written decree survived seventy years and an empire change. The clerks found it in Media, not in Babylon. The search succeeded only because God watched over it.
- Reversal. Opponents asked for the search, hoping to stop the work. It confirmed the builders in every detail and added royal funding they had never claimed.
- Restoration. The vessels go back "each to its place." They return to use, not to a treasury. Without them there could be no sacrifice and no worship.
- Reminder. The ark did not come back. The recovery was real and joyful, yet incomplete. It fits a people who thank God for what He has restored, while owning what is still missing.
Therefore Tatnai, governor beyond the river, Shethar-boznai, and your companions the Apharsachites, who are beyond the river, be ye far from thence
These words open King Darius's written reply to the officials who had challenged the Jews' right to rebuild the temple in Jerusalem. The men who came to investigate the work are now told to keep their distance. How did a hostile inquiry end up protecting the work it targeted?
Darius had the royal records searched for the decree of Cyrus. The moment it turned up, he answered the officials.
That was enough for Darius. He rebuked the officials. And far from listening to the enemies of the Jews, he honoured the Jews. He made fresh commands, carrying out even more fully what Cyrus had proclaimed in his first year.
Tattenai and Shethar-bozenai governed the province Beyond the River. One writer notes that they are only the latest in a line of men set against the same work.
New men had replaced the earlier enemies of the people. Bishlam, Mithredath, Tabeel and their companions opposed the temple at first. Now it is Tattenai, Shethar-boznai and their companions. In Nehemiah 6:1 the names change again: there Sanballat, Tobijah and Geshem the Arabian, with their companions, oppose the work. One group of men follows the other in their more or less violent hatred against the work of God. But the opposition remains, because the enemy who uses all these instruments has not changed.
Two things gave this command its force. The scroll lay in an unlikely place, and Persian law made a royal decree unchangeable.
Darius, the Persian, supports the Jews and gives a fair verdict. That verdict rests on "the law of the Medes and Persians… that no injunction or ordinance that the king establishes can be changed" (Daniel 6:15). In all this we can see the providence of God watching over His people. They found the decree of Cyrus at Achmetha, in the province of the Medes, and not at Babylon. Without God stepping in, even the most careful search would have found nothing. … The adversaries have no respect for the people of God, yet they hurry to obey the king's decree, because the fear of man fills their hearts. But God uses everything, even this fear, to carry out His plans of grace for the protection of His own.
The complaint went up to Darius. The answer came back against the men who sent it, and one writer sees God at work out of sight.
Acting on this decree, Darius commanded Tattenai, Shethar-boznai and their companions to stop troubling the Jews and to let them continue their work in peace. To faith, God was plainly working behind the scenes. He used the power of the enemy to carry out His own purposes — another instance of how He causes all things to work together for good to those who love Him. Darius did not only confirm the decree of Cyrus when their adversaries stepped in. He also issued another decree: the king himself would pay for everything the house of God needed.
The order carried real weight. But the king's decree was not the first word in this story.
The authority of the great king came on the scene only to confirm God's word and God's servants, and to force the respect and help of those who had tried to hinder. What an encouragement to look above the hills to Him who sits in the heavens! … The commandment of the God of Israel had its right and first place, and the decrees of Cyrus, Darius, and Artaxerxes came in underneath it.
Permission from a king is not the same as power to finish.
The decree of Darius was not enough to keep them building. They needed the help of God. We too need the grace and blessing of God if we are to build up the church of God according to His Word.
Kelly turns from Darius to the reader. The lesson is not about working the system.
Our business is not to set one king against another. It is to go forward in the name of the Lord and to take His word as our full warrant. We can be certain of this: as we seek God's guidance, it is God's part to guide all men and all circumstances. That is His work, not ours. Our part, in short, is to go on in faith. He knows how to deal with those who oppose us.
- Search. The complaint against the Jews sent Darius to the records. Cyrus's decree turned up, and that settled the case.
- Hands off. Darius orders the very men who came to stop the work to stay away and leave it alone.
- Providence. The scroll lay in Media, not Babylon, and Persian law made the king's word unchangeable. God watched over His people through an old record.
- Reversal. The move meant to halt the building instead secured it, and brought royal funding with it.
- Order. God's commandment came first, and the king's decree came under it. No decree could replace God's help in the work itself.
let the work of this house of God alone; let the governor of the Jews and the elders of the Jews build this house of God in its place.
Darius searched the royal records and found Cyrus's original order. Now he answers the officials who had challenged the builders. His answer is not a permit but a command to stand back. Why would a foreign king defend a temple that is not his own?
The officials wrote hoping the king would stop the work. His reply came back as an order against them.
That was enough for Darius. He gave the officials a rebuke. And far from listening to the adversaries of the Jews, he puts honour on the Jews. He makes fresh commands, carrying out even more fully what had already been proclaimed in the first year of Cyrus.
The old decree was not filed where anyone expected. It turned up at Achmetha, a fortress in Media, far from Babylon.
In all this we can see the providence of God, watching over His people. The edict of Cyrus turned up at Achmetha, in the province of the Medes, and not at Babylon. This proves that without God stepping in, even the most careful search would have been in vain. Darius does not go as far as Nebuchadnezzar did, who was humbled and then proclaimed that the Most High rules over the kingdoms of men. Still, Darius acknowledges the God of heaven. And he recognizes the temple at Jerusalem as the house of God.
The adversaries' own letter produced this order. Their attack became the protection of the work.
To faith, God was plainly working behind the scenes. He was using the power of the enemy to carry out His own purposes. Here is another instance of how He causes all things to work together for good to those who love Him. When their adversaries interfered, Darius did not only confirm the decree of Cyrus. He also issued a second decree: his own treasury would pay for all the provision needed for the house of God.
The order names the builders: the Jews' own governor and elders, not the king's officers. The king's word did not start this work. It confirmed work already going on, and it turned the opposers into helpers.
So the great king's authority came on the scene only to confirm God's word and His servants, and to compel the homage and help of those who had tried to hinder. What an encouragement to look above the hills to Him who sits in the heavens! And, as we read, the elders of the Jews built, and they prospered through the prophesying of Haggai and Zechariah. The commandment of the God of Israel had its right and first place. The decrees of Cyrus, Darius and Artaxerxes came in under it.
Notice what the builders never did. They did not play one king off against another. They kept building and left the court to God.
Our business is not to set one king against another. It is to go forward in the name of the Lord, taking His word as our full warrant. We can be completely sure of this: as we seek God's guidance, it is God's part to guide all men and all circumstances. That is His work, not ours. Our part, in short, is to go on in faith. He knows how to deal with those who oppose us.
Read chapters 4 to 6 together and an order appears. The work stopped. Prophets stirred the people. Then the way opened.
Look at chapters 4 to 6 as a whole and an important lesson appears. Where hearts are not stirred before God, He may allow circumstances to make the work impossible. On the surface it will look as though the work stopped because of forces no one could control. The deeper reason is that there was little or no stirring in the hearts of God's people. On the other hand, God steps in — for instance, by sending prophets who speak to the heart of the people. Then, when hearts turn to God, He also takes care of the circumstances. And then nobody can stop the work until it is finished, "by decree of the God of Israel."
- Hearts — The long pause was not just political. When the prophets reached the people's hearts, the outward obstacles began to move.
- Search — The lost scroll surfaced in Media, not Babylon. Without God's hand, the most careful search would have found nothing.
- Rebuke — The letter meant to stop the work came back as an order against the men who sent it. Darius added fresh commands that went beyond Cyrus.
- Distance — Told to keep away, the opposers then had to help. God used the enemy's own power to do His work.
- Order — God's word held first place, and the royal decrees came in underneath it. Faith keeps building and leaves the rulers to God.
Moreover, I give orders what ye shall do to these elders of the Jews, for the building of this house of God that of the king's goods, of the tribute beyond the river, expenses be diligently given to these men, that they be not hindered.
The officials over the province asked Darius to check whether Cyrus really authorised the temple at Jerusalem, and the search found the record. The king's answer went far beyond a "yes": here he orders the province's own tax money to pay the builders, in full and without delay.
The opponents of the work had written to the king hoping he would stop it. The orders that came back said the opposite, and one writer traces the hand behind them.
Darius acted on this decree. He commanded Tatnai, Shetharboznai and their companions to stop troubling the Jews, and to let them carry on their work in peace. To faith it was plain that God was working behind the scenes, using the power of the enemy to carry out His own purposes. Here is another instance of how He causes all things to work together for good to those who love Him. When their adversaries stepped in, Darius did more than confirm the decree of Cyrus. He issued another decree too: the king himself would pay for everything the house of God needed.
The first complaint against the Jews had been about money: rebuild the city, and the king loses tax revenue. This decree turns that argument on its head.
Darius issued a decree that taxes owed to the king from his lands west of the river should cover the cost of the building (v. 8). Rehum had argued that once the temple was built, the Jews would stop paying taxes. Darius decreed that the Jews would have tax money paid to them!
The purpose clause at the end of the verse is the point of the whole arrangement. One writer draws out how far that protection reached while the people stayed in their place of obedience.
God Himself was the shield of His people while they did His work. While they obeyed His word and counted on Him for strength and defence, no one could hinder them. In this way Satan once more overreached himself. He was used to further the very work he hated. Centuries later the apostle wrote the same thing: "I want you to know, brothers, that what has happened to me has really served to advance the gospel." (Phil. 1:12.)
The order of events matters. The Jews had once stopped the work. Then they took it up again, before any new decree existed.
In stopping the building, Israel was at fault. What they lacked was faith in God. We have seen that when there was faith they dared to build, even though there was a decree against it. The effect of this faith is a decree in their favour — and that came through their adversaries' own interference. It is good to trust in God. Blessed be His gracious name!
So the king's money was not what drove the work. Another writer names what the record credits for their progress.
The beautiful fact, as we have already seen, is that the Jews had faith to resume the building of the house before they received this fresh decree. The record says the elders of the Jews built and prospered. They prospered not through the king's commandment, but "through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo."
The verse names the fund: the king's tribute from the province. One writer shows what that same tribute cost the people who paid it.
This king's tribute (Middah — Ezra 6:8; Ezra 4:20) was demanded of them. Everyone had to borrow from his brother, pledging his fields and vineyards. They could not repay the debt. So the land was no longer their own, and they even had to put their children into slavery, with no way to buy them back, because their fields were in their brothers' hands.
A Gentile king paying for God's house also says something about where the nation now stood.
This book of Ezra was of the greatest importance. It gives God's own account of the in-between state in which they waited for the Messiah… Meanwhile they are Lo-ammi (not-My-people). They are (not "were") slaves of the Gentile power. Yet Cyrus had proclaimed more than freedom to return. He had also given a charge to build Jehovah's house in Jerusalem, as prophecy had said.
- Attack. The complaint sent to Darius was meant to stop the temple; God used the enemy's own move to serve His purpose.
- Reversal. The accusers said the Jews would withhold taxes. The king handed tax money to the Jews instead.
- Shield. While they obeyed God and leaned on Him, no one could hinder them. Satan overreached again and pushed on the work he hated.
- Order. Faith built first, while a ban still stood. The decree followed their faith; it did not create it.
- Sobriety. The money came from a Gentile king's tribute. Real kindness — but it marked them as subjects of a foreign power, still waiting for the Messiah.
And that which they have need of, both young bullocks and rams and lambs, for the burnt-offerings to the God of the heavens, wheat, salt, wine, and oil, according to the appointment of the priests that are at Jerusalem, let it be given them day by day without fail;
Local officials asked a Persian king to shut down the building work in Jerusalem. Instead he ordered his own treasury to keep the altar stocked — animals for burnt offerings, and wheat, salt, wine and oil, fresh every day. Why does a pagan empire pay for the worship of Israel's God? And what was all that daily produce for?
Their opponents had written to Darius to stop the work. Commentators see God at work out of sight here. He used the enemy's own power to build what the enemy wanted stopped.
Faith could see God at work behind the scenes, using the power of the enemy to carry out His own purposes. Here is another instance of how He causes all things to work together for good to those who love Him. When their adversaries interfered, Darius confirmed the decree of Cyrus. He also issued another decree: he himself would pay for all the provision the house of God needed.
The turnaround goes further. An official named Rehum had earlier warned the king about tax money.
Rehum had argued that if the Jews built the temple, they would stop paying taxes. Darius decreed that the Jews would receive tax money! Yet even that was not all. Whatever the Jews needed, the priests in Jerusalem could ask for it, and they would receive it — bulls, rams and lambs for burnt offerings, wheat, salt, wine and oil. And not on one occasion only, but "day by day."
The building had stalled. The problem was never permission — the king's command was already on their side.
All this shows us that Israel was at fault in stopping the building of the temple. It appears from Haggai that they had made no progress at all. The fear their adversaries stirred up in them had stopped them. They had no excuse for this, since even the king's command was on their side. What they lacked was faith in God. We have seen that where there was faith they dared to build, even though there was a decree against it. The effect of this faith is to bring about a decree in their favour, and that even through the action of their adversaries. It is good to trust in God.
Each item in the decree belongs to a particular offering. This was not a random food parcel.
The material mentioned was for the sacrifices and offerings. Young bulls, rams and lambs for the burnt offerings. Wheat, oil and salt for the grain offering, and wine for the drink offering. The priests were to receive all these things without fail, day by day.
Those three offerings are not interchangeable. Each one points to something different about the Lord Jesus.
The grain offering was never offered alone, but always together with a blood offering. In the burnt offering, the offerer recognises this: the Lord Jesus glorified God by sacrificing Himself at Calvary. But we may appreciate His sacrifice while not valuing the perfection of His person. So the grain offering reminds us of His life on earth. In every detail of it, the Lord Jesus expressed the perfection of human righteousness. Then the drink offering of wine stands for the offerer's joy in the offering. The believer rejoices in the Lord Jesus Himself and in the value of His work.
The decree names Him "the God of heaven." That title marks a change.
Long ago, when the ark passed through the Jordan, people spoke of Him as "the God of all the earth." Now He is to be known simply as "the God of heaven." As we see in Daniel, the earth passes in fact into the hands of the Gentiles. God's throne is no longer on earth where people can see it.
So Israel now leaned on the favour of foreign rulers. Commentators trace that back to the nation's own sins.
Because of their sins, Israel depended on the favour of those who ruled over them. They had to wait on God to make those rulers favourable. So they worshipped Him according to His merciful arrangements, until the Messiah should come, who would be their Redeemer and Deliverer.
- Attack — the letter meant to stop the work is what produced a royal decree to fund it. God used the enemy's power for His own purposes.
- Supply — the taxes the enemies feared losing now flow to the Jews, and the altar gets fresh supplies "day by day," not once.
- Faith — the delay was never about permission. What they lacked was faith in God. Faith is what brought the decree about.
- Christ — every item pictures Him. The burnt offering: God glorified by His sacrifice. The grain offering: the perfection of His life. The drink offering: the believer's joy in Him.
- Heaven — the decree calls Him "the God of heaven," for His throne is no longer on earth where people can see it. So His people wait on Him to turn rulers' hearts, until the Messiah comes.
that they may present sweet odours to the God of the heavens, and pray for the life of the king and of his sons.
A hostile report to Darius was meant to shut the building down. Instead the king searched the records and confirmed the older decree of Cyrus. He paid for the sacrifices out of his own taxes — and asked the returned exiles to pray for him and his sons.
The enemies' letter to the king was the very thing that secured the work:
To faith it was plain that God was working behind the scenes, using the power of the enemy to serve His own purposes. This is another instance of how He causes all things to work together for good to those who love Him. When their adversaries stepped in, Darius did not only confirm the decree of Cyrus. He issued another decree: the king himself would pay for all the provision the house of God needed.
The reversal was sharper than it looks. The original complaint had warned that a rebuilt temple would cost the crown its taxes:
Rehum had argued that if the temple were built, the Jews would stop paying taxes — but Darius decreed that the Jews should be paid out of the tax money! And that was not all. Whatever the Jews needed, the king would supply: bulls, rams and lambs for burnt offerings, wheat, salt, wine and oil. The priests in Jerusalem had only to ask — and not on one occasion only, but "day by day."
The shopping list in the decree is not random. Each item belongs to a particular offering:
The material mentioned was for the sacrifices and offerings. Young bulls, rams and lambs for the burnt offerings. Wheat, oil and salt for the meal offering, and wine for the drink offering. These things were to go to the priests without fail, day by day.
Older translations call these "sacrifices of sweet savour." The ESV says "pleasing sacrifices."
The title Darius uses is the name God Himself takes while His people are under foreign rule:
From the start one solemn fact is clear: for now the Jews are Lo-ammi (not My people). God no longer speaks to them through the prophet… God is given the distinct title "the God of the heavens" (Dan. 2:18, 37, 44), and the same title comes back in Ezra 1:2, Ezra 5:12 and Ezra 6:9-10… His people had turned away from Him to idols. That state made it impossible, given His nature and majesty, for Him to act at their head or among them as "the Lord of all the earth."
What the king asked for from Jerusalem was prayer. That request says something about the standing of this small, humbled group:
Darius does not go as far as the humbled Nebuchadnezzar, who proclaimed that the Most High rules over the kingdoms of men. Even so, he acknowledges the God of heaven, and he recognises the temple at Jerusalem as the house of God… Darius also recognises that the prayers of these despised and humbled people are effective on behalf of the king and his sons (v. 10).
Commentators differ on how far to press this. Rossier notes only what Darius acknowledged. Another writer sees a deeper change, and applies it to us:
Does this not appear to be a true work of God in the king's soul? Today, whatever government Christians may be under, it is important that they pray for those in authority over them.
Scripture gives a clear reason for praying for rulers:
We should pray for kings and all in authority, for the sake of the Lord's people throughout the world. We are to ask that the sovereign goodness of God may so control the rulers of this world that His people may lead "a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way"… Long ago the prophet Jeremiah sent a letter to God's captive people in Babylon. He urged them to pray to the Lord for the city that held them, and so to seek its peace. For, says the prophet, "in its welfare you will find your welfare" (Jeremiah 29:7).
Taking a pagan king's money did not make the returned exiles worldly. They held two things together:
They accept the favour of Cyrus, of Darius, and of Artaxerxes, in the spirit of the command "honour to whom honour, fear to whom fear"… They were clearly grateful for the kindness these powers showed them, one after another. They blessed God because of them, and I am sure they were ready-hearted to pray for the life of the king and of his sons. Yet with all this they were a separated people. They refused to join with the Samaritans just as earnestly as they accepted the favours of the Gentiles.
- Opposition — The letter written to stop the work uncovered the decree that funded it. God used the enemy's power to serve His own purposes.
- Provision — Bulls, rams, lambs, wheat, salt, wine and oil covered the burnt, meal and drink offerings. They came "day by day" from the very taxes the enemies feared losing.
- Position — "The God of heaven" is the title God takes while His people are out of place under foreign rule. He does not act among them as "the Lord of all the earth."
- Prayer — Darius asked a small, despised group to pray for him. Their prayers counted for the life of the king and his sons.
- Peace — The pattern still stands. Pray for rulers and seek the welfare of the place you live. You will share in its welfare — and still stay a separated people.
Also I have given order that whosoever shall alter this rescript, let timber be pulled down from his house, and being set up, let him be hanged thereon, and let his house be made a dunghill for this.
Local officials had asked Darius to check whether Cyrus really authorised the rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem. He did more than confirm it. He attached a death penalty to anyone who tampered with his order, so the empire's own power now guarded a work its own officials had tried to stop.
The threat is aimed at the man's house as much as at the man. A beam is torn from his own roof and becomes the means of his death. (Older translations read "hanged" where the ESV has "impaled".)
Darius clearly thought it necessary to add a solemn decree. Anyone who tried to change his edict was to have his house destroyed, and was himself to be hanged from the timber of his house (v. 11). This would very effectively stop any show of hostility by the enemies of the Jews.
The empire's power now stood around the builders instead of against them. The words Darius chose also hint at what he knew of the God whose house it was.
So the king surrounded the Jews with his authority. He guarded them from further interference with their work by making it a death penalty to meddle with it. From the language he used, there can be little doubt that Darius himself knew something of "the God of heaven," for he speaks of Him as causing "His name to dwell there." Either way, God turned his heart in favour of His people and of the work of building His house. The decree took effect at once. We read that Tatnai and his companions "did speedily" what Darius had ordered. All opposition stopped, and the enemies of the work disappeared from the scene.
Persian law made a king's written order permanent, and the decree itself rests on a scroll found in an unexpected place. Commentators read both facts as God directing events.
Darius the Persian supports the Jews and gives a fair sentence, and it rests on the fact that, by "the law of the Medes and Persians… no decree or statute which the king establishes may be changed" (Dan 6:15). In all this we can see the providence of God, watching over His people. The edict of Cyrus is found at Achmetha, in the province of the Medes, and not at Babylon (v. 2). That proves that without God stepping in, even the most careful search would have been in vain… he uses the authority entrusted to him to punish those who would oppose the will of God; and last, he solemnly calls on the God who dwells at Jerusalem to carry out vengeance on those who oppose Him.
The Jews started building again while the case against them was still open. Their protection came later, and it came through the complaint their enemies had filed.
What they lacked was faith in God. We have seen that when there was faith they dared to build, even though there was a decree against it. This faith brings about a decree in their favour — and it comes through the action of their enemies. It is good to trust in God. Blessed be His gracious name!
The royal decrees were never the first cause of the finished house. Something else held that place.
So the authority of the great king came on the scene only to confirm God's word and His servants, and to force respect and help from those who had tried to hinder… The commandment of the God of Israel had its right and first place, and the decrees of Cyrus, Darius and Artaxerxes came in under it.
The officials who wrote to Darius hoped for an order to stop the work. What came back was protection, and death for anyone who interfered. The same pattern shows up again in the New Testament.
God Himself was the shield of His people while they were busy in His service. As long as they obeyed His word and counted on Him for strength and defence, nothing could hinder them. In this way Satan once more overreached himself, and God used him to further the work that he hated. As the apostle Paul wrote centuries later, "I want you to know, brothers, that what has happened to me has really served to advance the gospel." (Phil. 1:12.) … So, whatever the opposition or persecution, we may go forward calmly and with steady courage, because the work we are doing is the Lord's, and He has said, "Behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age."
- Faith first. They started building again before any new decree existed. The protection in this verse came after the step of trust, not before it.
- Enemies as couriers. The complaint meant to stop the work produced the decree that defended it. Satan overreached, and furthered what he hated.
- Providence in an archive. The scroll turned up at Achmetha, not Babylon. God steered a search that would otherwise have found nothing.
- The real shield. God Himself shielded His people. Here He did it by wrapping a king's authority around them, and opposition stopped at once.
- Ranked authority. The decrees of Cyrus, Darius and Artaxerxes come under the commandment of the God of Israel. They confirm His word; they do not create the work.
And the God that has caused his name to dwell there overthrow every king and people that shall put forth their hand to alter [or] to destroy this house of God which is at Jerusalem. I Darius have given [this] order; let it be done diligently.
Darius ends his ruling on the temple with a prayer, not a threat of his own. He asks God to deal with anyone who would tamper with the house. The verse raises two questions. How much did this Persian king know of Israel's God? And why did an empire end up guarding a small and despised people?
The king does more than permit the work. He wraps the builders in his own authority, then hands the matter to a higher court. One writer notes the words Darius chooses for God, and what followed once the order went out.
The king surrounded the Jews with his authority. He guarded them against further interference by putting the penalty of death on anyone who meddled with their work. From the language he uses, we can hardly doubt that Darius had some knowledge of "the God of heaven." He speaks of Him as causing "His name to dwell there." However that may be, God turned his heart in favour of His people and of the work of building His house. The effect of the decree was immediate. Tatnai and his companions did quickly what Darius had sent. All opposition stopped, and the enemies of the work disappeared from the scene.
The phrase points to God's presence. One writer marks out what that presence included and what it did not.
Joy fills the hearts of the people. Once again God causes "His name to dwell" (v. 12) in this restored house, in a publicly approved way. His glory does not return to it, and neither does His throne between the cherubim. But where the centre of gathering of His people is acknowledged, His spiritual presence cannot be lacking.
The whole decree hangs on an old record that turned up in an unlikely place. One writer reads the search itself as God at work.
In all this we can see the providence of God, watching over His people. The edict of Cyrus turns up at Achmetha, in the province of the Medes, and not at Babylon (v. 2). This proves that without God stepping in, even the most careful search would have been in vain. Darius does not go so far as the humbled Nebuchadnezzar, who declared that the Most High rules over the kingdoms of men. Still, he does acknowledge the God of heaven, and he recognises the temple at Jerusalem as the house of God. He also recognises that the prayers of these despised and humbled people are effective for the king and his sons (v. 10). He uses the authority entrusted to him to punish those who would oppose the will of God. Lastly, he solemnly calls on the God who dwells at Jerusalem to take vengeance on those who oppose Him.
The order of events matters. The builders had already picked up their tools before any of this reached them. Their enemies were the ones who wrote to Darius and triggered the search.
All this shows us that Israel was at fault in stopping the building of the temple. They had no excuse, since even the king's command was on their side. What they lacked was faith in God. We have seen that when there was faith they dared to build, although there was a decree against it. The effect of this faith is to produce a decree in their favour. And it comes even through the action of their adversaries. It is good to trust in God.
The lesson here is not a method for handling rulers. One writer draws the opposite conclusion.
So God knows how to turn everything aside and fit it to His purpose. Our business is not to set one king against another. It is to go forward in the name of the Lord, taking His word as our full warrant. We can be completely sure of this: as we seek God's guidance, it is God's part to guide all men and all circumstances. That is His work, not ours. Our part, in short, is to go on in faith. He knows how to deal with those that oppose us.
- Faith first. The builders dared to build while a decree stood against them. The decree in their favour came afterwards.
- Enemies as couriers. The decree that protected the work came through the action of their own adversaries. Opposition carried the help.
- Providence in an archive. The edict turned up at Achmetha in Media, not Babylon. Without God's hand, the most careful search would have found nothing.
- A name, not a glory. "Caused His name to dwell there" marks God's presence with a gathered people. The glory and the throne between the cherubim did not return.
- His work, not ours. Kings' hearts are God's business to direct. Ours is to go forward on His word and leave the opposers to Him.
Then Tatnai, governor on this side the river, Shethar-boznai, and their companions, because of that which king Darius had sent, did so diligently.
In Ezra 6:13 the opposition collapses. The officials who had questioned the builders now carry out the king's orders at once. So who was really in control — Darius, his governor, or the God whose house they were rebuilding?
Tattenai — also spelled Tatnai — was not a neutral bystander. Earlier he came to Jerusalem as a Persian official and challenged the Jews' right to build.
The king of Persia's provincial governor in Palestine, who tried to stop the Jews from rebuilding the temple. Ezra 5:3, 6; Ezra 6:6, 13.
God Himself shielded His people while they worked, and that protection came with a condition. Darius, for his part, ended his decree by demanding speed and threatening anyone who tampered with it. Older translations say the officials "did speedily"; the ESV says they acted "with all diligence."
So God Himself was the shield of His people while they were doing His work. As long as they obeyed His word, and counted on Him for strength and defence, no one could hinder them. In this way Satan overreached himself once again. He was used to further the very work he hated... So the king surrounded the Jews with his authority. He guarded them against further interference with their work by making interference punishable by death... The effect of the decree was instant. We read that Tatnai and his companions "did speedily" what Darius had sent word to do. At once all opposition ceased, and the enemies of the work disappeared from the scene.
The hostile power that had once threatened the work now stood over it as a guard.
The opposition to the work of the house of God had now ceased. But that was not all. God, in His care for His people, and in response to their faith, had also turned the heart of the king toward them. So his royal power had now become their shelter and defence.
The enemy's complaint started the chain of events. It ended with the king paying for the work.
To faith it was plain that God was working behind the scenes. He was using the power of the enemy to carry out His own purposes. Here is another instance of how He causes all things to work together for good to those who love Him. When their adversaries interfered, Darius confirmed the decree of Cyrus. He also issued another decree: he would pay for everything the house of God needed.
This was not a one-off.
All that the enemy was doing to hinder the work turned out to help it forward. How often this has happened in the history of Israel and the Church.
The order of events matters. The builders had already started again, stirred by the prophets Haggai and Zechariah. No favourable ruling had yet come from Persia.
As I noted, the building of the house seems to have stopped for about fourteen years. But it is a happy thing to see what started it again. It was not a decree in its favour from the great Persian king who ruled over the Jews at that time. It was the voice of God's prophets, Haggai and Zechariah. The Lord did indeed turn the heart of the king. But He did not do it until His prophet had turned the heart of Israel... The Lord turned the heart of the king their master to support them, when they had taken again the place of faith and obedience.
Their earlier stopping was a failure of nerve, not sensible caution. The decree in their favour then came through the very people trying to block them.
The terror with which the adversaries had inspired the Jews had stopped them. They had no excuse for this, since even the king's commandment was on their side. What they lacked was faith in God. We have seen that, when there was faith, they dared to build, although there was a decree against it. This faith results in a decree in their favour — and it comes through the very action of their adversaries. It is good to trust in God.
Verse 13 clears the road for the builders. But a royal decree cannot finish a temple.
Tattenai the governor and those with him did not hesitate to obey the king's decree. They were diligent in carrying out all his orders (v. 13)... The decree of Darius was not enough to keep them building. They needed the help of God. We too need the grace and blessing of God if we are to build up the Church of God according to His Word.
- Faith first. The work restarted at the prophets' word, even though a decree stood against it.
- Then the king's heart. God turned Darius toward His people only after His prophet had turned Israel's heart back to Him.
- Through the enemy. Their own complaint produced the decree that paid for the work and protected it.
- Speed, not delay. Tattenai had tried to halt the building. Now he carried out the orders at once. Opposition vanished, and royal power became the builders' shelter.
- Still dependent. A decree could not finish a temple. They needed God's help, and so does any work done for Him.
And the elders of the Jews built; and they prospered through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo. And they built and completed [it] according to the commandment of the God of Israel, and according to the commandment of Cyrus, and Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia.
The temple work ends here, and the verse names two forces side by side: the preaching of two prophets and the decrees of three Persian kings. So which one made the elders prosper? And why list the kings at all?
The order of events matters. The Jews restarted the building before this fresh decree from Darius ever reached them.
The beautiful fact, as we have already seen, is that the Jews had faith to resume the building of the house before they got this fresh decree. "And the elders of the Jews built and prospered" — not through the commandment of the king, but they prospered "through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo." For now that God had given them power, He also controlled all the ruling authorities, so that they now favoured His people.
The verse keeps two groups distinct — those laying stones and those speaking God's word.
It is important to notice these two classes — the builders and the prophets. These two kinds of service can never be confused. A builder cannot take up the work of a prophet, nor could a prophet trade his prophetic mantle for the builder's trowel... A builder is one whose work is to lay stones on the foundation. God uses him, through preaching or teaching, to gather souls and bring them as living stones to the foundation, which is Jesus Christ. A prophet does two things. He urges the people forward in their work by passing on the mind of God, and he tests everything by His word.
The verse says they prospered through the prophesying. The same writer explains why, then traces the pattern through Israel's history and into the church.
The reason is clear. The Holy Spirit was acting in power — first through the prophets, and then in the hearts of the builders, producing a response to the word of God that the prophets brought. All through the history of the kingdom, the nation prospered when they listened to the voices of their prophets. Every evil consequence flowed from ignoring these heaven-sent warnings. It is no different in the church of God. Whenever "the builders" listen to the prophets who unfold and apply the mind of God as revealed in His word, they prosper. Their work lasts, and they themselves receive blessing. But if they are careless of divine guidance and correction, and work after their own ideas, they only corrupt the work they are doing. They put wood, hay, and straw in the place of gold, silver, and precious stones. Their work may look greater, and even more prosperous, to human eyes. But a future day will test it, and the Lord alone is the judge of true prosperity in service.
Haggai and Zechariah are named together, yet they did not bring the same message.
Haggai's ministry stirred up the conscience of the people, urging them to consider their ways, which must have led them to seek His face. Zechariah is the prophet of glory. The vision of glory, the final victory of God's people, the coming of the King and the setting up of His kingdom, the future overthrow of all their enemies — all this became an inspiration for them. God's people need this twofold ministry, which is so abundantly supplied in the Word of God.
The verse names God's commandment first, then the decrees of Cyrus, Darius and Artaxerxes.
The authority of the great king came on the scene only to confirm God's word and His servants, and to force those who had tried to hinder the work to honour and help it. The commandment of the God of Israel had its just and primary place; and the decrees of Cyrus, Darius, and Artaxerxes came in below it.
Yet the kings are not dismissed. Their names teach how God's people live under earthly rulers.
Everything was done, therefore, in obedience to God, and by the permission of the earthly power to which, by God's appointment, they were subject. What a privilege for these workmen to have laboured this way — and no small honour, we may add, for these Gentile monarchs to be linked with God's purposes and used to carry them out! No doubt the names of the kings are mentioned to show, for one reason, the value God attaches to the principle of obedience to constituted authority.
The same writer adds one limit. Human authority becomes void the moment it clashes with God's claim over the soul. Otherwise the believer submits.
Commentators differ over the text itself. Gaebelein notes that some claim the words "and Artaxerxes king of Persia" do not belong here.
- Faith first. They resumed building before Darius's decree arrived — obedience moved before official permission did.
- Word next. Prophesying made them prosper: Haggai pressed God's word on the conscience, Zechariah unveiled God's coming glory.
- Roles distinct. Builders lay stones on the foundation; prophets urge the work forward and test everything by God's word. Neither can do the other's job.
- Kings subordinate. God's commandment holds first place, and the kings' decrees come in underneath. Their names still honour obedience to governing authority — except where it clashes with God's claim on the soul.
- Result lasting. Builders who heed the word prosper, and their work endures. Work done our own way may look impressive now, but the Lord tests it later.
And this house was finished on the third day of the month Adar, which was in the sixth year of the reign of king Darius.
The temple is finished, and Scripture fixes the day. Two questions follow. What finished a work that enemies had stopped for years? And why does the record credit both God's commandment and the decrees of foreign kings?
The verse before names two prophets as the reason the elders prospered. One writer points out that the builders had started again before the king's new decree reached them.
The adversaries were completely refuted and stopped in their evil work. The house of God received — I will not say an impulse, but — its completion. The beautiful fact, as we have already seen, is that the Jews had faith to resume the building of the house before they got this fresh decree. "And the elders of the Jews built and prospered [not through the commandment of the king, but] through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet and Zechariah the son of Iddo." Now that God had given them power, He also controlled all the ruling powers in their favour.
Haggai and Zechariah served at the same time, yet their messages differed. Another writer separates what each one gave.
Haggai's ministry stirred up the conscience of the people. He urged them to consider their ways, which must have led them to seek His face. Zechariah is the prophet of glory. His vision showed the final victory of God's people, the coming of the King and the setting up of His kingdom, and the future overthrow of all their enemies. That vision of coming glory became an inspiration for them. God's people need this twofold ministry, which is so richly supplied in the Word of God.
Only four years passed between the restart and this date. One commentator names the conditions of that revival, and the cause of the long delay before it.
This revival came in the middle of humiliation, while the people were under Gentile rule. That is its special character. Work on the temple had stopped for fifteen years, from the second year of Cyrus to the second year of Darius the Persian (Ezra 4:24; Hag. 1:1). Four years later the house of God stood complete (v. 15). How disastrous are the delays caused by fear of man and by lack of confidence in the Lord! That lack of confidence is the sure outcome of fearing man.
Chapters 4 to 6 tell one story: work stopped, prophets sent, work finished. One writer draws the order out of it.
Where hearts are not stirred, God may allow circumstances to make the work impossible. On the surface it will look as though the work stopped because of forces beyond anyone's control. The deeper reason is that there was little or no stirring in the hearts of God's people. On the other hand, God intervenes, for instance by sending prophets who speak to the heart of the people. Then, when hearts turn to God, He will also take care of the circumstances. And then nobody will be able to stop the work, until it is finished, "according to the commandment of the God of Israel."
Verse 14 lays God's command alongside the decrees of Cyrus, Darius and Artaxerxes. One writer reads the pairing as deliberate, and draws a rule from it.
So they did everything in obedience to God, and with the permission of the earthly power God had placed over them. What a privilege for these workmen to have laboured this way! And no small honour, we may add, for these Gentile kings to be linked with God's purposes and used to carry them out! No doubt the record names the kings partly to show the value God attaches to obedience to the authorities He has set over us. We should not pass over that lesson.
The verse gives a day and a year. The same writer counts back from it to the laying of the foundation.
Four years were taken up from the restart of the building until its completion (Ezra 4:24). No one can tell exactly how many years had passed since the foundation was laid, because Scripture does not give the length of the reigns between Cyrus and Darius. The years could scarcely have been less, and were probably more, than twenty. With what long-suffering and patience God had borne with the failures of His people! His purpose now stands accomplished and the house stands built. With what delight He calls our attention to the labours of His people! Although all had been done by His grace, in that same grace He credits to His people what He Himself had done.
- Stopped by fear. The fifteen silent years came from fear of man and lost confidence in the Lord, not from the enemy's strength.
- Restarted by the Word. Haggai reached the conscience, Zechariah showed the coming glory; God's people need both.
- Prospered, not permitted. They built before the new decree arrived. The prophets' word made them prosper, and God turned the ruling powers in their favour.
- Finished under two commands. God's commandment held first place, and obedience to the kings He had set over them held its own.
- Dated and credited. God bore with more than twenty years of failure. Then He fixed the day in the record, and credited to His people the work His own grace produced.
And the children of Israel, the priests and the Levites, and the rest of the children of the captivity, kept the dedication of this house of God with joy;
The second temple stood finished at last, and the people who had come back from exile held its dedication with joy. The building was far smaller than Solomon's and most of the nation was still scattered, so what did they have to be glad about?
The completion came only after a long stoppage, and commentators trace that delay to the builders' own timidity rather than to the strength of their enemies.
The elders among the Jews build and prosper through the prophesying of Haggai and Zechariah. They complete the temple by the commandment of the God of Israel — and also by the commandment of the ruling kings of Persia (v. 14). This is the special mark of this revival: God brought it about while they were humbled and under the rule of the Gentile powers. The work on the temple had stopped for fifteen years... How disastrous are the delays caused by the fear of man, and by the lack of confidence in the Lord that always follows it!
The joy was real, but the house was not what it had been. What God gave back was His presence at the acknowledged centre, not the visible glory of former days.
Compared with the dedication of Solomon, a glorious memory, this dedication is a very feeble thing. Even so, joy fills the hearts of the people. Once again God causes "His name to dwell" (v. 12) in this restored house, and with public approval. His glory does not return to it, nor His throne between the cherubim. But His spiritual presence cannot be missing where His people acknowledge the centre at which He gathers them.
One thing was missing at this dedication, and it says a lot. Fire had once come down from heaven on the sacrifices; here none came.
The LORD had given them cause for joy. But fire no longer came down from heaven to show that God accepted the sacrifice offered at the dedication of the house. It was a difference of absence, yet a deeply significant one. Even the thing they rejoiced in showed their true state: "The LORD had turned the heart of the king of Assyria to them, to strengthen their hands in the work of the house of God, the God of Israel." That was great kindness and touching grace on His part. But what a change!
When the foundation was laid, the contrast with the older house had brought tears. The same contrast was here, yet this time the joy held.
If they had dwelt on this side of things, their joy might well have come mixed with weeping and tears, as it did when they laid the foundation. But faith has to do with unseen things. So faith could remind this weak, small company that the Lord was no less mighty and no less merciful for them than He was for Solomon.
The verse calls this gathering "the people of Israel," though they were only a fragment of the nation. How would they treat those who stayed behind in Babylon?
In fact, these "children of Israel" were only a small, weak part of the two tribes Judah and Benjamin, along with the priests and the Levites. At such a moment they might have been tempted to forget their brothers who had not answered the proclamation of Cyrus — or even to shut them out... Those brothers chose an easy life in Babylon, captives though they were, instead of suffering hardship with those "whose spirit God had raised"... So had they not forfeited their place and title among the people of God? A harsh spirit might have argued that way. But this poor, weak company, whatever their condition, held the thoughts of God.
This dedication is one of a series of glad gatherings in Israel's history, all of them tied to God's house, and one writer draws a direct encouragement from the fact that this one came so late and in such poverty.
These feasts, with one exception, express pure joy alone. They were spontaneous, and the law never commanded them. The joy in them always had to do with the house of God. From this we may draw a comforting conclusion. Feeling the decline around us must not weaken our joy in any way, for the blessings the Lord pours on His Assembly today are worth as much as in the more prosperous times of the Church's history. "Rejoice in the Lord always", we are told — and that in days when the ruin was growing more marked.
- Finished — the house was completed under the preaching of Haggai and Zechariah. The work had stopped for fifteen years first, and commentators blame the fear of man.
- Feeble — the dedication was small beside Solomon's. No fire fell from heaven, and the glory did not return.
- Filled — God made His name dwell there again. His presence at their centre of gathering was reason enough for joy.
- Faith — their joy held because faith looks at unseen things. God was no less mighty and no less merciful for this weak few than for Solomon.
- Far-reaching — this small group did not write off the brothers who stayed away. They held the thoughts of God about the whole people.
and they presented at the dedication of this house of God a hundred bullocks, two hundred rams, four hundred lambs, and for a sin-offering for all Israel, twelve he-goats, according to the number of the tribes of Israel.
The temple stands complete, and the exiles mark the day with a few sacrifices — among them twelve goats for a nation whose ten other tribes were far away. Why do so few offer for all twelve, and what is left to rejoice in when so much is gone?
The dedication was a real celebration. But set beside Solomon's dedication, it looked poor.
It was only natural that they should rejoice at such a moment. The house of their God expressed all the blessings of the covenant in which they stood. And at last it stood completed before their eyes, after weary years of failure, difficulties, disappointments, and sorrow... But contrast this dedication with the dedication of Solomon's temple, and you see their own weakness and the poverty of their circumstances. Then the king offered a sacrifice of 22,000 oxen and 120,000 sheep... If they had dwelt on this, their joy might well have carried lamentation and tears, as it did when they laid the foundation. But faith has to do with unseen things. So it could remind this weak remnant that the Lord was no less mighty and no less merciful for them than for Solomon.
The number of goats is not a round figure. It matches a nation that had long since split in two.
By this time five or six centuries had passed since the nation split and the ten tribes broke away under Jeroboam. Yet the returned remnant recognised that God had called the whole nation out of Egypt. They knew the division which followed was their failure and not God's purpose, and that God never swerves from His original thought and call. So they still had all twelve tribes on their hearts. Though they were only a remnant, they held to God's thought and purpose for the whole nation.
Here the twelve appear in sacrifice, not in stone.
The sacrifice makes a public confession of sin, and it leaves no tribe out. In the time of Elijah, an altar of twelve stones expressed the unity of the people. We no longer find that. Instead we find twelve male goats offered on the altar for the expiation of a common sin. So they acknowledge their solidarity and equality in sin. These exiles belonged to Judah and Benjamin. In their eyes the sin of those two tribes is just as great as the sin of the other ten, and it needs the same expiation.
Most of the people were nowhere near Jerusalem. The offering still covered them, and that has a lesson for small gatherings today.
And faith was at work in these children of the captivity, for we find that they offered a sin offering for all Israel. All Israel was not there — only representatives of two or three tribes. But these few stood on the ground of the nation before God. They understood this, and so they included all the tribes of Israel in their sin offering. This is a significant lesson for the remnant gathered out in these last days to the name of the Lord Jesus Christ... for the faith that links itself with God on the one hand links itself on the other hand with all His people.
Fire from heaven had once shown God's acceptance at such a dedication. This time it did not fall.
The Lord had given them cause for joy; but fire no longer came down from heaven to testify to divine acceptance of the sacrifice offered for the dedication of the house. This was indeed a negative difference, but one of deep significance.
God's people are still divided today. One writer separates what we cannot change from what we can still do.
Does this not have a voice for today, does it not give direction in a time of ruin? We cannot undo the scattering of God's people, we cannot force everyone to return to the basic principles that Jerusalem stands for (though we want to encourage as many as we can to do so). But we can act on the basis that the people of God is one.
- Finished — the house stood complete after years of failure and delay. Faith could remind a weak remnant that God was no less mighty for them than for Solomon.
- Joy — the small offerings and the missing fire from heaven marked a changed day, yet the people still rejoiced.
- Confession — twelve goats put every tribe under the same sin offering. The exiles claimed no advantage over the ten tribes that stayed away.
- Whole — the split in the nation was human failure, not God's purpose. So a few from two tribes still carried all twelve on their hearts.
- Today — we cannot undo the scattering, but we can still act on the fact that God's people are one.
And they set the priests in their classes, and the Levites in their divisions, for the service of God, which is at Jerusalem as it is written in the book of Moses.
The temple is finished and dedicated. The first thing the returned exiles do is order its service, setting priests and Levites in their groups by the written instruction of Moses. Why did a small, poor remnant tie itself so closely to a book?
A newly finished house might have invited new human arrangements. These builders went the other way.
They were also marked at this moment by obedience. They arranged the service of the house, both the priests and the Levites, as the book of Moses says. The path of obedience, whether for the individual or for the assembly, is the only path of blessing. At that time, with the house of God just completed, they would have thought it folly for man to push his own thoughts into it. Their only concern was to know what God had said, what He had directed.
The groups themselves go back to David. He sorted the priestly families into fixed turns of service, which older writings also call courses or classes.
David divided the priests into 24 courses: 16 of them were of the house of Eleazar, and 8 of Ithamar. A list of them, under the name of each head, is given in 1 Chronicles 24:6-19. The Levites were divided in a similar manner.
Yet the verse points to Moses, not to David. One writer weighs both what is named here and what is missing:
The priests are set in their divisions, and the Levites in their courses, according to the law of Moses. Here we find more faithfulness than in the best days of the kings. But we hear nothing of the ordinances of David, and we see a still greater lack in their keeping of the feast of dedication.
This verse is not a one-off. The same phrase keeps returning from the first altar onward.
The return of the Jews from their captivity in Babylon was also marked by their submission to the authority of the written law of Jehovah. When they were gathered together as one man in Jerusalem, they "built the altar of the God of Israel, to offer burnt offerings on it, as it is written in the law of Moses, the man of God... they kept also the feast of tabernacles as it is written."
The people had far less to give than before.
Despite so many blessings, the resources of the people were very much diminished, whether for offerings or for service (compare 1 Kings 8:63). But this did not hinder the order of service in any way. For this order they had an authority that could not fail. They could always turn to what "is written in the book of Moses" — in other words, the word of God.
Another writer draws out what a time of ruin does not excuse:
They took care about order too. A time of ruin never justifies relaxing about Scripture. It calls for special care in those who care for God's house.
The same writer who described their obedience warns how such obedience slips away:
No danger is more subtle than the gradual creeping into the assembly of human thoughts and arrangements in place of the word of God. In effect, though it is not intended, it removes the Lord from His place of supremacy over His people. So there never was a time when it was more necessary to remember the words of our risen Lord: "He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches."
- Written. They set the service of the finished house "as it is written." Their one concern was to know what God had said.
- Ordered. The divisions were fixed turns of service. David had sorted the families into them.
- Unchanged. Their resources had shrunk, but the order of service held. The book of Moses stayed an authority they could always turn to.
- Heightened. A time of ruin is no excuse to hold Scripture loosely. It calls for greater care in those who care for God's house.
- Guarded. The subtlest danger is human arrangements creeping in to replace the word. That removes the Lord from His place of supremacy, even when no one means it.
And the children of the captivity held the passover upon the fourteenth of the first month.
The exiles had just finished and dedicated the temple. Weeks later they gathered for Israel's oldest feast, on the exact day the law set for it. Why did this small, powerless community reach past the glories of the kingdom to the night Israel left Egypt? What does that choice say about where they thought they stood with God?
The order matters: the house first, then the Passover. One writer sees the feast as the remnant tracing everything they had back to its source.
The connection is very beautiful. The house of their God is finished, and now His people celebrate the memorial of their redemption from the land of Egypt. So they remind themselves, to the praise of Jehovah, of the ground on which they stood. They remind themselves that the foundation of all their blessing, of all God's acting in grace towards them, was the blood of the slain Lamb… They passed by the glories of the kingdom. They travelled upward until they reached the charter of all they had, whether in title or in prospect, and there confessed God as the God of their salvation.
Another writer names what the Passover remembered, and what it matches for Christians now:
The Passover was the memorial of the sacrifice that preserved Israel from the judgment of God on the one hand, and set them free from slavery in Egypt on the other. For us Christians, this feast matches the memorial of the death of Christ, of our deliverance, and of the blessings of the new covenant in His blood.
The date matters. Israel had kept Passovers late before, when the people were not ready. This one stands against that record.
At last a Passover could be kept in Jerusalem. The last Passover recorded before this is Josiah's, which must have taken place over 100 years earlier (2 Chronicles 35:1-19). This one was kept on the proper day too. It was not like the Passover in Hezekiah's time (2 Chronicles 30:1-3), which was held in the second month because many were not purified in the first month.
The verse names them by where they had been. ESV calls them "the returned exiles"; older translations read "the children of the captivity." One writer shows why faith can carry such a name.
Ah, the humbling fact: "the sons of the province, that went up out of the captivity!" Pride forgets such things and hides them. But faith, cleared and cheered by grace, can afford in the darkest day to own the truth: however Israel may change, Jehovah does not change. Therefore the sons of Jacob are not consumed.
That small company also refused to shrink its prayers to its own size. It kept the feast on behalf of people who were not even there.
Notice how this remnant clings to the written word. The city is in ruins, the wall unbuilt, enemies all around. Most of the people of Israel are not with them, but are still scattered through the vast dominions of the king of Persia. Yet they offer the sin-offering for all Israel, and kill the Passover for all the children of the captivity who are absent — not with them, but still remembered and prayed for.
Being purified was the difference between a feast on time and a feast delayed. Commentators carry that over to the Lord's table now.
They realise that defilement cannot be allowed at the Lord's table, and that the world has no place there. They also realise that the supper cannot take place without self-judgment: "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup" (1 Corinthians 11:28).
Passover never stood alone. The seven days of unleavened bread that followed carry the point forward.
The moment we are redeemed God claims us, and He wants us to answer His claims by holy lives — separation from evil, and separation to Himself. The feast lasted seven days. That is a complete period — a picture of the whole span of our lives. So in the Old Testament as in the New, all God's claims on His people rest on redemption. "You are not your own, for you were bought with a price."
- Foundation. With the house finished, they went back to the blood of the lamb. That was the charter of everything they held and everything they hoped for.
- Memory. Passover recalled two rescues: from God's judgment, and from slavery in Egypt. It answers now to the memorial of Christ's death.
- Timing. Kept on the proper day, unlike Hezekiah's delayed feast — readiness, not convenience, set the date.
- Honesty. "Children of the captivity" is a humbling name; faith can own the ruin because the Lord does not change.
- Continuation. Seven days of unleavened bread follow the lamb. Redemption comes first, then a whole life claimed for God.
For the priests and the Levites had purified themselves as one [man] they were all pure; and they killed the passover for all the children of the captivity, and for their brethren the priests, and for themselves.
With the temple finished and dedicated, the returned exiles kept the Passover — and the priests and Levites first made themselves clean as one body. Why this feast now, what does it mean that all of them were clean, and why kill the lamb for people who were not even there?
The order of events carries the point. With the house finished, the people looked back to the night of their rescue from Egypt.
The connection is beautiful. With the house of their God finished, His people celebrate the memorial of their redemption from the land of Egypt. In this way they remind themselves, to the praise of the Lord, of the ground on which they stood. They also remind themselves that the foundation of all their blessing, of all God's acting in grace towards them, was the blood of the slain Lamb… Passing by the glories of the kingdom, they travelled back up to the charter of all they had, whether in title or in prospect. There they confessed God as the God of their salvation.
The feast came back as soon as everything else was back in place.
They again find the order of the feasts God set up. This happens as soon as complete order is back: the altar, the temple, the gathering and unity of the people, and the presence of the Lord among them… The Passover was the memorial of the sacrifice that kept Israel safe from the judgment of God on the one hand, and set them free from slavery in Egypt on the other. For us Christians, this feast matches the memorial of the death of Christ, of our deliverance, and of the blessings of the new covenant in His blood. We keep this memorial on the first day of the week, the day of resurrection, which is "the beginning of months" (Exodus 12:2).
The cleansing was not the work of a few. They acted as one, just as they had in the building work.
The priests and Levites had purified themselves as one man; they were all pure, and so in a proper condition to celebrate the Passover. They realized that they could not bring impurity to this holy, commemorative meal. Just as they had been unanimous in building the altar, in overseeing the work, and in laying the foundations of the temple, so they are now unanimous in purifying themselves.
Earlier generations had not managed this.
Here the zealous care of the priests and the Levites is remarkable: they had purified themselves as one man, and were all pure. It had not been so even during Hezekiah's earnest reform, when they had to fall back on the second month, the provision given for the wilderness, because many in the congregation could not keep the feast in the first month… Now the right order was kept.
The faithfulness here was real. So was what had gone missing.
The priests are set in their divisions, and the Levites in their courses, according to the law of Moses. Here we find more faithfulness than in the best days of the kings (compare chapter 6:20 with 2 Chronicles 29:34). But we hear nothing of the ordinances of David. Their celebration of the feast of dedication shows a still greater lack… Fire no longer came down from heaven to show that God accepted the sacrifice.
They killed the lamb not only for those present, but for a scattered people who could not be there.
And here notice how this remnant clings to the written word. The city is in ruins, the wall unbuilt, enemies all around. Most of the people of Israel are not with them, but still scattered across the vast empire of the king of Persia. Yet they offer the sin offering for all Israel, and kill the Passover for all the children of the captivity. Those people are absent — not with them, but still remembered and interceded for.
The feast was long overdue, and the cleansing it called for still speaks today.
They could finally keep a Passover in Jerusalem. The last one on record was Josiah's, over 100 years earlier (2 Chronicles 35:1-19)… On this occasion the priests and Levites had purified themselves. That speaks not only of personal cleansing, but of being kept clear of any link with evil, just as today those who eat the Lord's supper should be free from evil associations.
- Foundation. With the temple finished, they went back to the blood of the lamb — the ground of everything they had, in title and in prospect.
- Purity. They purified themselves together — unanimous and complete, with no priest or Levite left out.
- Standard. The first Passover on record in over 100 years was kept at the right time — unlike Hezekiah's, which waited for the second month because the people were not clean.
- Reach. They killed the lamb for absent brothers still scattered abroad, so the feast remembered and interceded for people who could not be there.
- Table. The same care belongs to the Lord's Supper: cleansing from personal sin, and from every link with evil.
And the children of Israel that were come back out of captivity, and all such as had separated themselves to them from the filthiness of the nations of the land, to seek Jehovah the God of Israel, did eat;
The temple is finished and dedicated, and the returned exiles keep the Passover. But the verse names a second group at the table: people who had joined them after breaking with the uncleanness around them. Two questions follow: who were these newcomers, and why were they welcome?
The chapter names two groups who ate: those who came back from exile, and those who came over to them. One writer sees the first group as a blessing to the second:
Now comes the feast, and two classes keep it. First, the children of Israel, who had come again out of captivity. Second, all those who had separated themselves to them from the filthiness of the land. Notice, these returned ones, the first class, have been a blessing to the second class. Together they eat and keep the feast of unleavened bread with joy, for the Lord had made them joyful.
One writer names what opened the door, and the ground the whole company stood on:
Grace welcomed all who had separated themselves to them from the filthiness of the nations of the land to seek Jehovah the God of Israel. The strangers are no less welcome than the remnant. It is of all importance to stand on the ground of God's people. That means not pretending to be Israel, when in truth they were a feeble few. It means standing there not in the pride that forgets sin and ruin, but in the faith that holds to the ground which grace gives and keeps, refusing every substitute for it.
Commentators differ on the identity of this second group. One reads them as Jews, not converts from the nations:
Those who had separated themselves from the filthiness of the heathen were not proselytes — that is, Gentiles who turned to Israel. They were Jews who had married heathen women (10:11). They were true to the written Word.
Another traces them to the people who were never deported at all:
Jeremiah 52:16 tells us that when the great captivity took place, "certain of the poor of the land" were left behind, so that they might be farmers and work the soil. Some of these, or their descendants, cleansed themselves from the evils they had become involved in. They joined in this time of revival and blessing, and so could take part in the feast of unleavened bread.
The move here has two halves: away from defilement, and toward the God of Israel.
Some of the people had stayed in the land through the captivity. Among them, "all who had separated themselves to them from the filthiness of the nations of the land, to seek Jehovah the God of Israel" (v. 21) took part in this solemn feast. They did not form part of the testimony in the strict sense, yet they came to associate themselves with true practical holiness. And so they had part in the memorial and the feast.
The meal itself explains the requirement:
All of the priests and the Levites purified themselves (v. 20). Those who had separated themselves "from the filthiness of the heathen of the land, to seek the Lord God of Israel" ate of the Passover. Nothing that dishonours God was to have a place in this feast. It reminded them of that night when God spared those who sheltered under the blood of the Passover lamb (Exodus 12).
The seven days that followed carried the same meaning forward:
This feast of unleavened bread is a picture of complete, perpetual sanctification, kept for seven days. Seven is the number of fullness. It stands for the whole course of our life — a life devoted to the One who delivered us by His death, and to the One we belong to.
Where they kept the feast mattered too:
They kept the passover — a proof that the redemption of the people could be remembered in the land. Happy privilege of the restored remnant!
Writers carry the pattern over to the Lord's table today:
All Christians who are separated from the world, and from the lifeless profession of Christianity around us, have the right to the Lord's table. Their brothers receive them there with joy.
And the small company must not shrink into itself:
Some believers may bear a remnant character, in keeping with what we are seeing in the book of Ezra. If so, they must always keep in view the whole Church of God. They must not become wrapped up in themselves, as though others did not count before God.
- Cleansed — the second group broke with the uncleanness of the nations around them before they ate.
- Joined — separation had a destination. They turned to the returned people and to the God of Israel, and joined themselves to real practical holiness.
- Welcomed — grace opened the feast, not ancestry. The strangers were no less welcome than the remnant.
- Fed — the Passover proved they could still remember redemption in the land. The seven days of unleavened bread picture a whole life given to the One who delivered them.
- Joyful — commentators differ on who these newcomers were, but not on the result: the Lord made them joyful. And a small company like this must keep the whole Church of God in view.
and they kept the feast of unleavened bread seven days with joy; for Jehovah had made them joyful, and turned the heart of the king of Assyria to them, to strengthen their hands in the work of the house of God, the God of Israel.
The temple is built and the Passover is over. Now the chapter ends with a week-long feast, and the verse gives two reasons for it: God gave the people their joy, and God moved a foreign king to help them.
The verse names God as the source of the joy. One writer also points to what the people themselves had done:
No wonder that the feast of unleavened bread was kept, and was kept with joy (v. 22), and the king of Assyria was supportive of the work of the house of God. It is a timeless principle: obedience brings joy and blessing.
Yet much was missing that day. Another writer says the loss does not cancel the joy:
The glory of Jehovah did not appear now, and no fire from Him burned up the offerings. Neither one would have suited a day of ruin and small things. True faith would not look for them either. As things are, there is no greater privilege and no higher honour; claiming more is only the flesh at work, and it opens the door to Satan. But faith has a right to gladness of heart, whatever the sorrow over God's broken and scattered people. Let the path be narrow, and the heart large.
The New Testament takes up this feast and applies it to how believers live:
This feast came right after the Passover, and takes its special meaning from it. The apostle has explained this to us. He says, "Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. Let us therefore celebrate the festival, not with the old leaven... but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth" (1 Corinthians 5:7-8). That is, the moment we are redeemed God claims us. He wants us to answer that claim by holy lives — separation from evil, and separation to Himself. The feast lasted seven days: a complete period, and a picture of the whole course of our lives.
Another writer notes that the law gave this bread a different mood:
This feast is a picture of sanctification, both shared and personal, spoken of in 2 Corinthians 6:17 to 7:1. The restored remnant keeps this feast with joy. They had done the same at the feast of tabernacles, at the dedication of the foundation, and at the dedication of the house (Ezra 3:13; Ezra 6:16, 22). Here the feast differs from the law of Moses, which called this bread "the bread of affliction — for you came out of the land of Egypt in haste" (Deuteronomy 16:3). In the middle of all these recovered blessings, there is no room for any feeling but joy.
The king in this verse is Persian, so the title puzzles readers. One writer explains it from history:
It is interesting to see at the end of Chapter 6 that the Lord had "turned the heart of the king of Assyria toward them." So the king of Persia is called both "the king of Babylon" (ch. 5:13) and "the king of Assyria." Persia had conquered Babylon, and Babylon had earlier conquered Assyria. So Persia's king held authority over Assyria and Babylon.
The same writer, commenting on Proverbs, states the wider rule behind this:
It is true, not only of believing kings, but of all kings, that their hearts are in the hand of the Lord. They may think their rule answers to no one, but the Lord knows how to turn their hearts to do His will.
Commentators differ on the mood of the ending. One writer hears a note of loss in it:
They kept the Passover — a proof that the redemption of the people could be remembered in the land. Happy privilege of the restored remnant! ... And even the thing they rejoiced in showed what their condition now was. "Jehovah had turned the heart of the king of Assyria to them, to strengthen their hands in the work of the house of God, the God of Israel." It was great kindness and touching grace on His part. But what a change!
- Obedience. They kept the feast God commanded. Joy and the king's support followed: obedience brings joy and blessing.
- Gift. The verse credits the joy to God, not to their circumstances. The glory and the fire were gone, but faith still has a right to gladness of heart.
- Holiness. Seven days of unleavened bread picture a whole life kept clean. Christ our Passover was sacrificed, so the redeemed belong to God.
- Reach. The "king of Assyria" is the Persian ruler who now held Assyria and Babylon. Every king's heart is in the Lord's hand, believing or not.
- Honesty. The foreign king's help was real kindness. It also showed how much had changed, so joy and honest sorrow sit in the same verse.
And after these things, in the reign of Artaxerxes, king of Persia, Ezra the son of Seraiah, the son of Azariah, the son of Hilkijah,
Ezra 7 opens a new section of the book. It starts with a date, a foreign king's name, and a family tree reaching back to Aaron. Behind it lie decades of silence, a people under foreign rule, and God preparing one man to bring His word back to a declining nation.
The phrase that opens the chapter covers a long stretch of unrecorded history. The narrative jumps from the finished temple to a new king and a new generation.
There is a long break in the history, of about sixty years, between Ezra 6 and Ezra 7. The Book of Esther belongs to that period, if the common view is right that the Ahasuerus of Esther was King Xerxes. Ezra 7 records what happened in the reign of Artaxerxes Longimanus. Here Ezra, "a ready scribe in the law of Moses," appears for the first time, and is God's agent for blessing. He is spoken of elsewhere as priest and scribe.
Those silent years were not empty. Another writer sees God at work in them:
Between the two parts of this book there are 60 years. In those 60 years the events of the book of Esther took place. They show that God in sovereign mercy kept His people, so that His own service could be set up again.
Israel's own kings are gone. A foreign throne now dates the chapter.
Notice again that the signs are everywhere: ruling power on the earth has passed from the Jew to the Gentile. So the date of Ezra's mission is given as "in the reign of Artaxerxes king of Persia," and the commission the king gave him for his work is recorded in full (vv. 11-26). This proves that God's people were at this time under the authority of the Gentiles, and that God Himself always recognizes the powers that have their source in His own sovereign appointment.
Israel's own failure had produced that arrangement, yet God did not abandon them in it.
But now their turning away from God had laid them at the feet of the Gentile world-power. So God worked in His compassion — first by prophets and His own word, and now by help that came at the king's word from Babylon. And the faithful priest, who had the king's confidence, comes up to Jerusalem to call the remnant back to the law of Jehovah, which they had neglected and broken.
The verse begins a list of names that runs back to Aaron, Israel's first high priest. Anyone could check Ezra's credentials.
First (vv. 1-5), we find his genealogy, and it has no gap in it. He came from the priestly line. Through his ancestors and their virtues — the faithfulness of a Zadok, the zeal of a Phinehas — his descent goes back to "Aaron the chief priest."
Descent alone did not make Ezra useful. Commentators draw a sharp line between what he inherited and what he acquired.
He became a priest by birth and consecration. But he only became "a ready scribe in the law of Moses, which the LORD God of Israel had given," by personal study of the Word. So an inherited office, even among the Jews, could not give a man the fitness to use it. That fitness could only come from time spent alone with God in the Scriptures.
Spiritual decline had set in since the temple was finished. So where does a failing people turn?
Where, then, can one find a resource against this spiritual decline and its results? There is but one resource: the word of God. God raises up Ezra to teach the people the law of Moses and to remind them of its importance. This is not a matter of new revelations, as it was when Haggai and Zechariah spoke to the people. It is simply a matter of bringing the "statutes and ordinances" (v. 10) found in "the law of Jehovah" back to light, and of applying them to the conscience.
Ezra's story stands out because nothing spectacular happens in it.
All is ordinary: his resources are only what ours in this day are, the word and the presence of God. But he used them, and used them well and faithfully throughout. Before he began to act, he prepared his heart to seek the Lord. He had meditated on His statutes until his progress, as we may surely say, was plain to everyone.
- Silence — About sixty unrecorded years sit between chapter 6 and this verse. The events of Esther fall in that gap, and God kept His people through it.
- Sovereignty — A Persian king's name dates the chapter. Rule had passed from the Jew to the Gentile, and God honours the authority He Himself appointed.
- Standing — The genealogy runs back to Aaron without a gap, so Ezra could prove his right to the priesthood.
- Study — Birth made him a priest; only personal time in the Scriptures made him a ready scribe. Position never supplies the fitness to use it.
- Supply — Against decline there is one resource: God's word. Not fresh revelation, but old truth brought back to the conscience — carried by a man whose only resources were the word and the presence of God.
the son of Shallum, the son of Zadok, the son of Ahitub,
This verse sits inside a family list. It runs back from Ezra through Zadok and Ahitub to Aaron, Israel's first chief priest. The names look like dry record-keeping. Commentators read them as the credentials of the man God was about to send back to Jerusalem.
One writer ties this genealogy to the tone of the whole book Ezra wrote:
Ezra was a priest, his genealogy is traced back to Aaron. The Holy Spirit of God gives us the genealogy of Ezra to show the priestly character of that book. And if we bring worldly things into the worship of God, we are on very dangerous ground.
The line through Shallum, Zadok and Ahitub gave Ezra a right to serve. That right alone did not equip him:
The genealogy of Ezra is traced back to Aaron (vv. 1-5). He was therefore entitled to all the rights and privileges of the priesthood (see Ezra 2:62). He was also a ready scribe in the law of his God. That qualified him to teach the people the statutes of Jehovah (see Lev. 10:8-11; Mal. 2:4-7). He became a priest by birth and consecration. But he became "a scribe skilled in the Law of Moses that the LORD, the God of Israel, had given" only by personal study of the Word. So even among the Jews, an inherited office could not supply the fitness to carry it out. That could only come from dealing with God personally in the Scriptures. Neglecting the teaching side of their office is what led to the failure and corruption of the priesthood.
Earlier in the same book, other men could not produce a record like Ezra's:
If any could not show their genealogy, they had no claim to take part in the work they had been called to. For the priests, the consequence was even more serious. If they could not find their register, they were treated as unclean and put out of the priesthood. They were not told that they were not priests. The point taken was that their claim was not proved. It might be proved at a later time. Grace could restore what was lost under law; only for this they had to wait patiently.
Zadok, named here as the son of Ahitub, served as priest in David's day:
Son of Ahitub, of the house of Eleazar. He was priest in the reign of David, and though Abiathar was called high priest, at times Zadok is named before him. Abiathar was set aside by Solomon, and Zadok became high priest. 2 Sam. 8:17; 1 Kings 2:35; Ezek. 44:15.
Ezra's ancestors were not just names in a chain. They had a character of their own:
Ezra was, in every respect, remarkable as chosen of God to fulfill this mission. In the first place (vv. 1-5), we find his genealogy which presents no gap. He came from the priestly line. Through his ancestors and their virtues — the faithfulness of a Zadok, the zeal of a Phinehas — his descent went back to "Aaron the chief priest".
The same writer turns this straight onto anyone who serves God's people now:
Should not the case be the same today for the ministers of the Word? Their persons, their works, and their conduct should clearly show that all their springs are in Christ (Ps. 87:7), the true high priest. It should be evident to the eyes of all who their Leader is and from whom they have received life.
Ezra's mission brought no power with it. It brought what the people needed:
The way God stepped in through Ezra's mission is, I think, a touching proof of His loving-kindness. It suited the need of the people exactly. It was not power. Power had been moved to another place. It was the knowledge of the will and the ordinances of God — of the mind of God in the word. The king himself recognised this (Ezra 7:25). Guarded by the good hand of his God, this pious and devoted man goes up with many others to Jerusalem.
- Traced — the list runs back without a gap through Zadok and Ahitub to Aaron. The Spirit records it to stamp a priestly character on the book that follows.
- Proved — Ezra could show his register. Others back from exile could not, so they lost their place among the priests until their claim could be proved.
- Inherited — Zadok, named in this verse, was priest under David. Solomon later put him in Abiathar's place as high priest.
- Earned — birth and consecration made Ezra a priest. Only personal study of the Word made him a scribe skilled in the law. An office never supplies the fitness to use it.
- Shown — Ezra's line made plain where he came from. Those who serve should make plain whose they are. What God sent through Ezra was not power but the knowledge of His mind in the Word.
the son of Amariah, the son of Azariah, the son of Meraioth,
This verse sits inside a chain of fathers and sons that runs back from Ezra to Aaron, Israel's first high priest. It names only Amariah, Azariah and Meraioth, yet their list is what proves Ezra's right to the priesthood.
The three men named here are priests. A Bible dictionary gives the father of Meraioth, the earliest of the three:
Meraioth was the son of Zerahiah, a priest. 1 Chronicles 6:6-7, 52; Ezra 7:3.
The point of the list is the man it ends with. Ezra could show a descent from Aaron with no gap in it, and the record carries the good name of earlier priests in his line:
Ezra was, in every respect, remarkable as chosen of God to fulfil this mission. In the first place (vv. 1-5), we find his genealogy, which presents no gap. He was of the priestly race, and through his ancestors and their virtues — the faithfulness of a Zadok, the zeal of a Phinehas — he had his origin in "Aaron the chief priest."
A page of names can look like dead weight. One writer finds a purpose in it, and a warning with it:
Ezra was a priest; his genealogy is traced back to Aaron. The Holy Spirit of God gives us the genealogy of Ezra to show the priestly character of that book. If we bring secular things into the worship of God, we are on very dangerous ground.
Commentators differ over whether this genealogy is complete. Rossier reads it as having no gap. William Kelly counts links left out of it, yet holds that the record is sound:
If you take Ezra, for instance, giving his own genealogy as a priest, you find that he leaves out not just three links in the chain, but seven. There may well have been a special reason for the omission. But whatever we make of the difficulty, it is clear that a priest giving his own genealogy would not put it forward in a faulty form.
Another writer, quoting a source, explains why the list here is short:
1 Chronicles 6:1-15 gives the high priest's genealogy going down the line, ending with the captivity. Ezra 7:1-5 gives it going up the line, from Ezra himself back to Aaron. There it is shortened by leaving out many links, because the writer had already given a complete register in Chronicles.
Birth settled what Ezra was allowed to do. It did not settle what he was able to do:
Ezra's genealogy goes back to Aaron, so he was entitled to all the rights and privileges of the priesthood (see Ezra 2:62). He became a priest by birth and consecration. But he only became "a scribe skilled in the Law of Moses that the Lord, the God of Israel, had given" by personal study of the Word. So an inherited office, even among the Jews, could not supply the fitness to carry it out. That could only come from dealing with God personally in the Scriptures.
Ezra's readiness came in an order, and teaching was not the first step:
He prepared his heart to seek the law first of all, and then to do it. For himself, he did not separate practice from knowledge. He was not like the teachers of the law in the days of Jesus. They loaded people with "burdens hard to bear," and did not touch the burdens with one of their own fingers (Luke 11:46). The commands of the Word he fed on soaked right through his daily life. Only after that did he set his heart "to teach his statutes and rules in Israel."
- Line. Amariah, Azariah and Meraioth stand in a priestly chain that runs back to Aaron. It gives Ezra a provable claim to the priesthood.
- Legacy. The line carries more than blood. The faithfulness of Zadok and the zeal of Phinehas stand in the family Ezra came from.
- Length. Commentators differ on the gaps. Some read the list as unbroken. Others count missing links, and note that Chronicles already holds the full register.
- Learning. Descent made him a priest; only personal study of the Word made him a scribe. Inherited position never supplies the fitness to use it.
- Living. He sought the Word, then did it, then taught it. Teaching came last, after his own life had been shaped by it.
the son of Zerahiah, the son of Uzzi, the son of Bukki,
Ezra 7:4 sits in the middle of a list of fathers and sons — Zerahiah, Uzzi, Bukki. The list carries Ezra's name back, step by step, to Aaron, Israel's first chief priest. It answers one question: on what ground does Ezra stand when he comes to Jerusalem to teach God's people?
The chapter opens a new stage. The temple was finished, and the people had peace. One writer sees that peace as where the trouble began. God's remedy was not new revelation but the recovery of what He had already said.
Now that the first work is finished, the people are called to enjoy its fruit in peace. Will they keep their spiritual level in these new circumstances? No; times come when that level drops fast. The world creeps in. Ungodly alliances are tolerated, as we will see at the end of this book, and they weaken the moral fiber.
Where, then, can one find a resource against this spiritual decline and its results? There is only one resource: the word of God. God raises up Ezra to teach the people the law of Moses and to remind them of its importance. This is not about new revelations, as when the prophets Haggai and Zechariah spoke to the people. It is simply about bringing the "statutes and ordinances" (v. 10) found in "the law of Jehovah" to light again, and applying them to the conscience.
Zadok and Phinehas stand in this same list, and it ends with Aaron. One writer reads these names as a record of character.
Ezra was remarkable in every way as the man God chose for this mission. First (vv. 1-5), we find his genealogy, and it has no gap. He came from the priestly line. Through his ancestors and their virtues — the faithfulness of a Zadok, the zeal of a Phinehas — he traced his origin to "Aaron the chief priest".
Commentators differ on whether the list is complete. One writer counts the links and finds names missing:
So if you take Ezra, for instance, giving his own genealogy as a priest, you find that he leaves out not just three links in a chain, but seven. There may well have been a special reason for leaving them out. But whatever we decide about the true answer to this difficulty, it is clear that a priest giving his own genealogy would not put it forward in a faulty form.
Uzzi and Bukki stand between Phinehas and Zadok in this list. Phinehas received a specific promise about his descendants.
He showed his zeal for God by killing Zimri and Cozbi. God commended him for it, and promised His 'covenant of peace' to him and his descendants — even 'the covenant of an everlasting priesthood.'
Men did not keep that promise. God did:
For hundreds of years the wrong line had seized the high priesthood. Eli belonged to the younger branch of Aaron's family. That branch took the high priesthood without any right to it, despite Jehovah's solemn promise to Phinehas (Num. 25:12-13). But the line was restored in Zadok, in the days of David and Solomon, for Jehovah is faithful despite man's failure and hostility.
The genealogy settles Ezra's right to serve. It does not settle his ability to teach.
He became a priest by birth and consecration. But he became "a scribe skilled in the Law of Moses that the LORD, the God of Israel, had given" only by personal study of the Word. So inherited office, even among the Jews, could not give a man the qualities needed to carry it out. Those could come only from his own time with God in the Scriptures.
Most of his fellow priests never made that second step:
But he was a skilled scribe, and that did not come through birth. It came through hard work at learning the law of Moses (v. 6). This ought to have been true of all the priests (Lev. 10:8-11), though most of them failed in this.
Ezra's origin was plain for anyone to check.
Should it not be the same today for those who serve the Word? Who they are, what they do, and how they live should show plainly that all their springs are in Christ (Ps. 87:7), the true high priest. Everyone should be able to see who their Leader is and from whom they received life.
- Decline — peace after the temple was built let the world seep in. The one resource against it was God's word pressed on the conscience.
- Descent — the names trace Ezra back to Aaron through men known for faithfulness and zeal. His right to serve rests on God's own priestly line.
- Promise — God gave Phinehas a covenant of an everlasting priesthood. He kept it even through the centuries when the wrong family held the office.
- Preparation — birth and consecration made him a priest. Only personal study of Scripture made him a skilled scribe, a step most priests skipped.
- Display — Ezra's origin was plain to all. In the same way, a servant's life should make plain whose he is and where his life came from.
the son of Abishua, the son of Phinehas, the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the chief priest,
The family tree that opens Ezra 7 ends at this verse, with the line running back through Phinehas and Eleazar to Aaron himself. Before Ezra acts, God introduces him by his ancestors — which raises two questions: what does the list prove, and what can it never prove?
The list runs backwards, name by name, with nothing missing. One writer picks out two ancestors in it who are remembered for more than their birth:
Ezra was, in every respect, remarkable as chosen by God to fulfil this mission. First (vv. 1–5), we find his genealogy, which has no gap. He was of the priestly line. Through his ancestors and their virtues — the faithfulness of a Zadok, the zeal of a Phinehas — he had his origin in "Aaron the chief priest."
Descent from Aaron gave Ezra a real place. But one writer draws a sharp line between what birth secured and what it could not:
Ezra's genealogy goes back to Aaron (vv. 1–5). He was therefore entitled to all the rights and privileges of the priesthood. He was also a skilled scribe in the law of his God, and that qualified him to teach the people God's statutes. He became a priest by birth and consecration. But he only became "a scribe skilled in the Law of Moses that the LORD, the God of Israel, had given" through personal study of the Word. Inherited office, even among the Jews, could not supply the qualifications for carrying it out. Those could only come from dealing with God personally in the Scriptures. Neglect of this second part of their office is what led to the failure and corruption of the priesthood. By the days of King Josiah, God's word had been completely forgotten. Finding a copy of the law in the temple became a landmark in his reign.
Another writer applies the same test to the rest of the priests:
He was a priest of God through birth. But he was a skilled scribe. That did not come through birth. It came through hard work at learning the law of Moses (v. 6). This ought to have been true of all the priests (Lev. 10:8–11), though most of them failed in this.
Phinehas was Aaron's grandson. One act made his name:
Son of Eleazar and grandson of Aaron. He showed his zeal for God in killing Zimri and Cozbi. God commended him for it, and promised His "covenant of peace" to him and his descendants, even "the covenant of a perpetual priesthood." He succeeded Eleazar as high priest.
So this one verse holds two kinds of priest: Aaron, set apart to the office, and Phinehas, whose zeal won a covenant. One writer treats these two men as two lights for reading the priesthood of Christ:
"Therefore say, Behold, I give to him my covenant of peace... even the covenant of a perpetual priesthood." Nothing can be finer than this. You could not have a more magnificent light in which to read the Christ of God than that act of Phinehas. Aaron was never entitled to a covenant of peace in this way. So you have these two Old Testament lights in which to read the priesthood of the Lord Jesus. He was the true Aaron and the true Phinehas.
The list is not filler. One writer reads it as a key to the whole book, and as a warning:
Ezra was a priest; his genealogy goes back to Aaron. The Holy Spirit of God gives us the genealogy of Ezra to show the priestly character of that book. And if we bring secular things into the worship of God, we are on very dangerous ground.
The same applies to those who serve God's people today:
Should the case not be the same today for the ministers of the Word? Their persons, their works and their conduct should clearly show that "all my springs are in you" (Ps. 87:7) — in Christ, the true high priest. It should be obvious to everyone who their Leader is and from whom they have received life.
- Line — The list runs back to Aaron with no gap. Ezra's standing as a priest rested on a record anyone could check.
- Title — That descent gave him every right and privilege of the priesthood. It was a real position, not a formality.
- Limit — Birth made him a priest. Only personal study of Scripture made him a skilled scribe, able to teach. Neglect of that study is what corrupted the priesthood.
- Zeal — Phinehas stands in the same line. His zeal won a covenant of peace and a priesthood that never ends. With Aaron, he is one of two lights for reading Christ's priesthood.
- Stamp — The list marks the whole book as priestly. It presses one question on every servant today: is it clear whose you are and where your life comes from?
-- this Ezra went up from Babylon; and he was a ready scribe in the law of Moses, which Jehovah the God of Israel had given. And the king granted him all his request, according to the hand of Jehovah his God upon him.
Sixty years of silence separate Ezra 6 from Ezra 7, and then Ezra arrives — a priest by birth whose request a foreign emperor grants in full. Two questions follow: what made him fit for the work, and why did the king say yes?
Ezra held two things at once: a priest's office and a working knowledge of God's law. They did not reach him by the same route.
He became a priest by birth and consecration; but he only became "a scribe skilled in the Law of Moses that the LORD, the God of Israel, had given," by personal study of the Word. So even among the Jews, an inherited office could not give a man what he needed to carry it out. That could only come from time spent alone with God in the Scriptures. Being consecrated gave the priest the right, by grace, to serve before God. But his service pleased God only when he did everything in obedience to the Word, and he could not teach at all unless he himself knew the mind of God. Neglect of this teaching side of their office led the priesthood into failure and corruption.
The verse does not simply say "the law of Moses." It adds who stood behind it. That clause answers a question about where the law came from.
Ezra was "a scribe skilled in the Law of Moses that the LORD, the God of Israel, had given." A blessed testimony that the Law of Moses was given by God, and not put together piece by piece, corrected, revised and added to by different hands.
What God sent His people was not a display of strength. It was a man who knew what God had said.
The way God stepped in through Ezra's mission is, I think, a touching proof of His loving-kindness. It suited exactly what the people needed. It was not power. Power had been moved elsewhere. It was the knowledge of God's will and His commands — the mind of God in the word.
Ezra asked; Artaxerxes granted. The verse gives the reason, and it is not Ezra's skill at asking.
Ezra showed himself to be a true man of faith. He traced everything up to God. He lost sight of himself, and to his soul God was everything. It was not his request (v. 6) that moved the king to act. It was God who put the thing into the king's heart. It was not Ezra's influence that commended him to the king and his princes. It was God who showed him mercy in front of them.
"The hand of the LORD his God" is not a one-off phrase in this book. It runs through Ezra's story like a refrain, and it reaches past him.
We meet this phrase many times (7:6, 9, 28; 8:18, 22, 31), and it shows how this man of God trusted the LORD for guidance. He saw His hand when Artaxerxes granted all he asked. It was the good hand of God that brought him to Jerusalem (7:9). His hand strengthened him (7:28)... The same hand that was for good upon Ezra, guiding, keeping and shielding him, is still upon all His people who trust Him and obey His Word.
The order matters. Ezra's inward purpose came first; the king's permission followed. That is the pattern writers draw out for anyone waiting on circumstances to change.
In the book we are looking at, king Artaxerxes is a picture of someone who sets an open door before Ezra. Yes, but Ezra had set his heart to do the will of God. God works all outward circumstances, and He opens the way when our heart is set on doing what is right in the sight of the Lord. We never have any ground to complain about circumstances if only our heart is right with the Lord. The Lord can and will take care of all else.
- Hand — the key. The verse gives one reason for everything Ezra received: God's hand was on him. Nothing else explains it.
- Hand prepares. Birth made Ezra a priest. Study made him a scribe skilled in the law. An office never supplies the fitness to use it.
- Hand gives the word. The God of Israel gave the law; no chain of editors pieced it together. What the people needed was that word, not power.
- Hand moves kings. It was not Ezra's request or influence that won Artaxerxes over; God put it into the king's heart.
- Hand opens doors. Set your heart to do God's will, and He arranges the circumstances. Then there is no ground to complain about them.
(And there went up [some] of the children of Israel, and of the priests, and the Levites, and the singers, and the doorkeepers, and the Nethinim, to Jerusalem, in the seventh year of Artaxerxes the king.)
This verse is the roll-call of the second return from Babylon. Ordinary Israelites, priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers and temple servants all travelled with Ezra to Jerusalem. Two questions follow: why did so few come, and why does God name such humble ranks?
This verse does not follow straight on from chapter 6. A long silence separates the two.
To see why Ezra's journey to Jerusalem matters, keep two things in mind. 80 years had passed since the first return from Babylon (ch.1-2). About 60 years had passed since the people finished rebuilding the temple. We are now in the days of the reign of King Artaxerxes I (465-424). How were things going in Jerusalem for those who had rebuilt the temple, and for their families and children? Sad to say, not everything had developed in a positive way.
The word "some" is the point. The king's backing was generous and public, yet the response was thin.
Artaxerxes had made a magnificent decree and given generously, yet the company was very small. Most preferred Babylon, and stayed there. God knows the faithful ones, and their names stand here in His Word forever. The Gentile king had given the decree, and the people had everything they needed. Even so, the undertaking was one of faith. They came out of Babylon trusting the LORD; they marched on in faith. Notice especially that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages we read about in the next chapter most likely happened because no women had joined Ezra's expedition.
The decree behind this verse left the choice open.
The king decrees that "any of the people of Israel or their priests or Levites in my kingdom, who freely offers to go to Jerusalem, may go with you" (v. 13). Cyrus had given the same privilege, as we see in Ezra 1. Now, after many years, the Spirit of God works once more through the king to deliver His people. But no human force was allowed: if a man went up, he must go of his own free will, for God would have willing servants. If under constraint, it must be only that of the Holy Spirit.
The list runs from priests at the top down to the temple servants, called the Nethinim in older translations. Their name tells you their place.
The name means 'given, devoted ones.' It was used for those who helped the Levites in the service of the tabernacle and the temple… God does not appear to have appointed them, as He did the Levites. Instead 'David and the princes' appointed them 'for the service of the Levites.' Ezra 8:20… After the return from exile the Nethinim are called the 'ministers of this house of God.' Like the priests and Levites, they paid no 'toll, tribute, or custom.' Ezra 7:24.
Writing on the earlier list of these same classes, one commentator draws out why God names such people:
These humble jobs are very valuable in the eyes of the Lord… It is the same today. Whether it is serving tables, passing the bread and the cup, or taking care of the "upper room", the Lord forgets none of it. He records the names of those who have kept this service, and they deserve it as much as anyone else.
Singers travelled out of Babylon with both companies. One writer turns that detail into a picture of our own journey.
The returning captives probably sang these songs, for 200 singers are counted with Zerubbabel, and others with Ezra, when each company came out of Babylon. (See Ezra 2:64-65, Ezra 7:7) We should follow that happy pattern and sing in spirit too. Our journey runs from Babylon to Jerusalem — from man's city to God's city — from this present evil world to the world to come.
A Persian court authorised this return to Jerusalem — not a normal state of affairs for Israel.
They were not only few and feeble, but unfaithful… But their turning away from God had now laid them at the feet of the Gentile world-power. In His compassion God worked anyway: first by prophets and His own word, and now by help that came at the king's word from Babylon. And the faithful priest who had the king's confidence comes up to Jerusalem. He calls the remnant back to the law of the LORD, which they had neglected and broken.
This date matters to students of prophecy. Artaxerxes gave two separate commands, and commentators differ over which one Daniel points to.
The king gave the first command to Ezra the scribe, "in the seventh year of Artaxerxes the king." In the twentieth year of the same king's reign, he gave another command to Nehemiah. Now it is important for us to decide which of these two Daniel means… But Scripture alone can decide the questions that arise out of Scripture.
- Willing — God forced no one out of Babylon. He wanted volunteers, and the only pressure allowed was the Spirit's.
- Few — the decree was generous and the funds ample, yet most stayed in Babylon; only men went, and the journey stayed an act of faith.
- Named — God records those who did go, class by class, from priests down to the temple servants whose name means "given ones."
- Valued — the Lord forgets no lowly service; those who do it deserve their place in the record as much as anyone.
- Singing — a small, weak company still travelled with singers, the pattern for anyone journeying from man's city to God's.
And he came to Jerusalem in the fifth month, which was in the seventh year of the king.
Ezra reached Jerusalem in the fifth month of Artaxerxes' seventh year. That one line of dating raises two questions: why does a Persian king's reign set the clock, and what brought Ezra safely across the desert?
Ezra was not part of the first group to come home. He arrived decades later, and not everything he found had gone well.
To see why Ezra's journey to Jerusalem matters, remember that 80 years had passed since the first return from Babylon (ch. 1-2). About 60 years had passed since the temple was rebuilt. We are now in the days of King Artaxerxes I (465-424). You may wonder how things were going in Jerusalem among the people who had rebuilt the temple, and among their families and children. Sad to say, not everything had developed in a positive way.
This same seventh year also fixes the distance to the next chapter of the restoration:
This was in the seventh year of the reign of Artaxerxes (Ezra 7:8). So it was 13 years later that King Artaxerxes commissioned Nehemiah to go to Judah (Neh. 2:1-8).
The verse counts the year by a foreign king's reign, not by a king in Jerusalem. That detail carries weight.
Notice again that the signs are everywhere: governing power on earth has passed from the Jew to the Gentile. So the date of Ezra's mission is given as "in the reign of Artaxerxes king of Persia." The king's commission for his work is even set out in full (vv. 11-26). This proves that God's people were at that time under Gentile authority, and that God Himself always recognises the powers that come from His own sovereign appointment.
The first month and the fifth month mark the two ends of a long road.
Ezra 7:9 says they set out on the first day of the first month. That was probably the day the people gathered at the river Ahava (Ezra 8:15). So the journey itself took a little less than four months. Ezra testifies that God guided them through every danger and shielded them from all their enemies. Truly "the name of the LORD is a strong tower; the righteous man runs into it and is safe."
One phrase keeps returning at every stage of Ezra's story.
In all this the hand of the Lord is acknowledged. We meet this phrase many times (7:6, 9, 28; 8:18, 22, 31), and it shows how this man of God trusted the LORD for guidance. He saw His hand when Artaxerxes granted everything he asked for. It was the good hand of God that brought him to Jerusalem (7:9). His hand strengthened him (7:28). The same good hand is acknowledged again in bringing them men to serve (8:18) and in delivering them (8:31). The same hand which was for good upon Ezra, which guided, kept and shielded him, is still upon all His people who trust Him and obey His Word.
Ezra did not arrive with power. He brought something else.
The way God stepped in through Ezra's mission is, I think, a moving proof of His loving-kindness. It fitted exactly what the people needed. It was not power. Power had been moved to another place. It was the knowledge of the will and the commands of God — of the mind of God in His word. The king himself recognised this (Ezra 7:25). Guarded by the good hand of his God, this godly and devoted man goes up with many others to Jerusalem.
The next verse shows what prepared him for the work:
It seems that God works this preparation of heart in only a few: not only to seek the truth of God, but to do it, and also to teach it to others. Learning is good, but teaching the truth comes only after obeying it. How can we expect our teaching to be effective if we ourselves are not examples of our teaching?
- Gap. Ezra arrives eighty years after the first return and sixty after the temple was finished. Nehemiah follows thirteen years later.
- Permission. A Persian king's reign dates the year. God's people lived under Gentile rule, and God still recognises the powers He appoints.
- Journey. First month to fifth month: a little under four months on a road with enemies waiting, crossed safely.
- Hand. One phrase covers the whole venture. The hand of God granted his request, brought him to Jerusalem, strengthened him, supplied men to serve, and delivered them. That same hand rests on all who trust and obey Him.
- Purpose. What arrived in the fifth month was not power but the mind of God in His word. It came through a man who had sought it, done it, and only then taught it.
For upon the first of the first month the project of going up from Babylon was determined on, and on the first of the fifth month he came to Jerusalem, according to the good hand of his God upon him.
Ezra's journey from Babylonia to Jerusalem took four months. The verse gives two dates and one reason: the good hand of his God was on him. So why does Ezra credit that hand, and not the king's permission or his own planning?
Why does the verse say Ezra "began to go up"? One writer shows where else the Bible uses that word.
The same word appears in Exodus 20:26 for the steps of an altar, and in 1 Kings 10:19 for the steps of a throne. In 2 Kings 9:13 it means the stairs. In 1 Chronicles 17:17 it describes a man of high degree. In Ezra 7:9 it is used of a journey: "began to go up." The word it comes from means simply to go up — to ascend.
God stepped in for His people through Ezra's mission. One writer looks at what kind of help God sent, and what He did not send.
The character of this intervention of God through Ezra's mission is, I think, a touching proof of His loving-kindness. It was exactly suited to the needs of the people. It was not power. That had been removed elsewhere. It was the knowledge of the will and the ordinances of God — of the mind of God in the word. The king himself recognised this (Ezra 7:25). Guarded by the good hand of his God, this godly and devoted man goes up with many others to Jerusalem.
The very next verse opens with "for," and that small word supplies the reason the hand was there at all.
Ezra prepared his heart to seek the law of the LORD first, and then to do it. He did not separate practice from knowledge. His daily life was soaked in the precepts of the Word he fed on. Only after that did he set his heart to teach it in Israel. In short, his life and his conduct agreed completely with his teaching. The result of this complete consecration to the Word and to the work was that "the good hand of his God was upon him," because — notice this "for" — he had set his heart. We find this in every period of time. God's protection rests especially on those who forget themselves to depend on Him alone, and who give themselves without reserve to His work.
Ezra names that hand again and again. Each mention points to a different service it did for him.
As for Ezra, he attributes everything to God, even the favour of the king (see verses 27, 28). Above all, he lives in the presence of his God. He proves that the hand of the LORD is upon him — to answer his prayer (v. 6), protect him (v. 9), strengthen him (v. 28), and deliver him (8:31).
How long did the road take, and what happened on it? One writer works the timing out from the dates.
Verse 31 gives a short statement about their journey. It simply records the faithfulness of their God in answer to their prayers. "Then we departed from the river Ahava on the twelfth day of the first month, to go to Jerusalem. The hand of our God was on us, and He delivered us from the hand of the enemy and from ambushes by the way. We came to Jerusalem." Ezra 7:9 says they began to go up on the first day of the first month. That was likely the date when the people gathered at the river Ahava (Ezra 8:15). So the journey itself took a little under four months. Ezra testifies that God guided them safely through all its perils and dangers, and shielded them from all their foes.
Seeing God's hand was Ezra's habit. One writer shows what it produced in him, and what it can produce in us.
How good it is to leave ourselves in His hands! We are often tempted to jump the barriers people put in our path, and to force open the doors that human hands have closed. But it is our comfort and strength to remember that the Lord can make His way plain before us whenever He wills. Our part is to wait quietly on Him, ready to go forward when He speaks the word. Recognising the hand of God upon him was a mark of this devoted servant (see verse 9; Ezra 8:18, 22, 31). It was the source of both his patience and his courage.
- Cause — a set heart. The hand rested on Ezra because he had given himself without reserve to God's Word and work.
- Gift — knowledge, not power. The help sent through Ezra was the mind of God in His word, exactly suited to what the people needed.
- Reach — four services. The same hand answered his prayer, protected the road, strengthened him, and delivered him from ambush.
- Cost — four months. The two dates cover a real and perilous journey, and Ezra credits every safe mile to God.
- Result — patience and courage. Seeing that hand made Ezra patient and brave. He could wait for God to open doors, and move the moment God spoke.
For Ezra had directed his heart to seek the law of Jehovah and to do it, and to teach in Israel the statutes and the ordinances.
Ezra 7 tells of a scribe who left Babylon for Jerusalem with a foreign king's blessing. Verse 10 gives the reason behind the journey: a heart set on three things in order — seeking, doing, teaching.
Ezra was a scribe who knew the Scriptures well. Yet the verse points deeper than his training. (The writers quote an older translation, which reads "prepared his heart to seek the law of the LORD" and "statutes and judgments.")
As a scribe he must have had a good knowledge of the words he had often written, and this must have prepared his head. The preparing of his heart went much deeper than this, for it led him to "seek the law of the Lord". He really wanted to be instructed of God.
God reveals Himself to hearts, and a prepared heart shapes everything we bring to Him.
It is to the heart that God makes His revelations... Preparing the heart is everything — and this also comes from the Lord — whether for the study of the Word, for prayer, or for worship.
His seeking had a purpose built into it: obedience. The same pattern holds for us.
Ezra lived under the law of Moses. Of that law our Lord said, "Do this, and you will live" (Luke 10:28). Ezra knew well that doing it was the great thing. We are not under the law but under grace, yet we still have the apostle's instruction: "Be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves" (James 1:22)... Under the law men were to obey in order to live. Under the Gospel God brings us into life so that we may do His will. It is easy to forget this, and treat Christianity as though it were simply an exalted philosophy to entertain our minds.
Ezra's study aimed at obedience, not at teaching. Reversing that order carries a cost, and the teacher himself pays part of it.
If Ezra prepared his heart to seek the law of the Lord, it was first and foremost that he might do it. He did not do it to increase his knowledge or to build his reputation as a teacher. He did it so that the law would shape his heart, his life, and his ways — so that his own walk would embody the truth... This order can never be ignored without penalty. Teaching that does not flow out of a heart subject to the truth cannot influence others. Worse, it hardens the heart of the teacher himself. This is the secret of many a failure in the Church of God.
Ezra stands apart from the teachers the Lord Himself confronted.
In the days of Jesus, the teachers of the law loaded people with "burdens hard to bear," and would not touch "the burdens with one of their fingers" (Luke 11:46). Ezra was not like them. His daily life was soaked in the commands of the Word he fed on... In a word, his life and his conduct were in complete agreement with his teaching.
What Ezra taught connects directly to why the people had been in exile.
Ezra was not only concerned about himself: he thought of God's people. The preparation was his own — he would know and obey the will of the LORD. But his thoughts were also for the good of those who had returned from exile. Their captivity had come from neglecting God's "statutes and judgments." So these were the very things he would teach, and by keeping them they could have God's blessing.
Verse 10 begins with "for." It gives the reason for what came just before it.
He gave himself completely to the Word and to the work. The result was that "the good hand of his God was upon him" — and notice the word "for": it was because he had directed his heart. This holds true in every age. God's protection rests above all on those who forget themselves, depend on Him alone, and give themselves to His work without holding anything back.
The king opened the way for Ezra. But something came first.
King Artaxerxes is the picture of one who sets an open door before Ezra. Yes, but it was Ezra's heart that was set to do the will of God. God works all outward circumstances, and He opens the way when our heart is set on doing what is right in the sight of the Lord. We never have reason to complain about circumstances, as long as our heart is right with the Lord.
- Heart first. Training as a scribe prepared Ezra's head. But God makes His revelations to the heart, and He gives that preparation too.
- Then doing. He sought the law to obey it, not to build a reputation. Under grace God brings us into life so that we may do His will.
- Then teaching. Teaching must flow from a heart already subject to the truth. If it does not, it moves no one, and it hardens the teacher.
- Then a people. Israel went into exile for neglecting God's statutes. Ezra taught those very statutes, so the returning people could live in God's blessing.
- Then the open door. His heart was set, so God's good hand rested on him and the king opened the door. Circumstances give way to a heart that is right with the Lord.
And this is the copy of the letter that king Artaxerxes gave to Ezra the priest, the scribe, a scribe of the words of the commandments of Jehovah, and of his statutes to Israel
Ezra 7:11 is the hinge of the chapter: it pauses the story to introduce a royal letter, and first it stacks up Ezra's titles — priest, scribe, expert in God's commandments. Why does a Persian king write such a letter, and why does Scripture list Ezra's credentials again before quoting it?
The verse names Ezra as both priest and scribe. He came by those two titles in very different ways.
Ezra's family line is traced back to Aaron. He was therefore entitled to all the rights and privileges of the priesthood. He was also a skilled scribe, and so qualified to teach the people the statutes of the LORD. He became a priest by birth and consecration. But he became a scribe skilled in the Law of Moses that the LORD, the God of Israel, had given only by personal study of the Word. So inherited office, even among the Jews, could not supply the qualifications needed to carry it out. Those could only come from personal dealings with God in the Scriptures. Consecration entitled the priest by grace to minister before God. But he could only minister acceptably when he did everything in obedience to the Word, and he could not teach at all unless he himself knew the mind of God.
The verse does not call Ezra a scribe only. It calls him a scribe of the LORD's commandments and statutes. One writer warns what a narrow knowledge of the Word does.
Often nothing is more damaging to souls than a shallow and narrow knowledge of the Word. God's children would avoid so many divisions and disputes if they looked at the Scriptures from their various sides. Take one truth away from the other truths tied to it, and leave those other truths out of account, and you usually show ignorance and self-will. It may even be the fruit of a proud self-satisfaction that wants to teach others and refuses to be taught by God. Almost all false doctrines start from a truth taken out of context. Misunderstood in that way, it becomes the very root of error.
The letter comes right after the statement that Ezra had set his heart to seek, do, and teach the law. One commentator reads the two verses together: the first explains the second.
Ezra now has power to act. But the great point, notice, is the purpose of his heart to do the will of God… In the book we are considering, king Artaxerxes pictures one who sets an open door before Ezra. Yes, but Ezra's heart was set on doing the will of God. God arranges all the outward circumstances, and opens the way, when our heart within is set on doing the right thing in the sight of the Lord. We never have any ground to complain about circumstances if only our heart is right with the Lord. The Lord can and will take care of everything else.
Verse 11 is the heading. The letter itself runs from verse 12 to verse 26. One writer reads it and sees God at work in the king's mind.
After this statement of the piety and zeal that marked Ezra, we get a full account of the letter Artaxerxes gave to Ezra. It amounts to a decree. Under its authority Ezra travelled to Jerusalem and acted once he got there. As you read these verses, you cannot help being struck by the wonderful work of God in the mind of a pagan king. It led the king to grant such powers, to order such help, and to acknowledge the claims and greatness of "the God of heaven". We also see the overruling wisdom of God controlling the mind of the king. So the king gave God's servant liberty — and even commanded him — to do what God intended.
The verse names a king and a scribe in one line. One writer sees God's hand in that pairing.
The lesson lies on the surface. God is sovereign in the choice of His instruments. He does according to His will among the inhabitants of the earth as in the army of heaven, and none can stop His hand or say to Him, What are you doing? Our chapter shows it. "Artaxerxes, king of kings," and "Ezra the priest, a scribe of the law of God," are yoked together to carry out God's thoughts for His people and for His house in Jerusalem.
- Heart first. Ezra's letter follows his resolve. Set your heart on doing God's will, and God arranges the outward circumstances and opens the way.
- Study, not status. Priesthood came to Ezra by birth; skill in the law came only by personal dealings with God in the Scriptures. Office never supplies its own qualification.
- Whole Word. A "scribe of the commandments" knows Scripture from every side. A truth pulled out of context is the root of almost every false teaching.
- Royal pen, divine hand. God worked in a pagan king's mind. That is where the powers, the help, and the words about "the God of heaven" in his decree came from.
- Yoked instruments. God yokes a king of kings and a priest-scribe together for His house. He chooses His instruments as He wills.
Artaxerxes, king of kings, to Ezra the priest, an accomplished scribe of the law of the God of the heavens, and so forth.
This verse opens the royal letter that Artaxerxes handed to Ezra, and the book quotes it down to verse 26. Why does a Persian emperor who calls himself "king of kings" write to a Jewish priest, and how do the two end up serving the same purpose?
At this verse the book changes language. Two sections of it are not in Hebrew, and this letter is one of them.
Two parts of this book are written in the Syriac or Aramean language — the language spoken in Babylon and Assyria. They are Ezra 4:8 to 6:18, and Ezra 7:12-26.
The title was true of Artaxerxes in a limited way. One writer points out who it fits far better.
He refers to himself as "king of kings," for there were kings in the Persian empire who were subject to him (v. 12). But how much more fitting is this title when applied to the Lord Jesus! (Rev. 19:16). However, he addressed Ezra as "a scribe of the law of the God of heaven." It seems he realized that Israel's God was much higher than the idols of Persia.
The name the king uses is not a vague courtesy. It belongs to a particular moment in God's dealings, after He had given His people over to Gentile rule and said of them Lo-ammi, "not my people."
God gave up apostate Judah to the Gentiles, as He had given up Israel before, and passed the sentence of Lo-ammi (not-my-people). He stopped acting as God of the earth, the Jehovah of His people. As "God of the heavens" He granted world-empire for a time to the four Gentile powers that followed one another. See Daniel 2.
That explains the strangeness of Ezra's position. The man sent to restore God's law among God's people carries his authority from a foreign throne.
But he takes up this work under the authority of the Persian power that had followed Babylon, made supreme by the God of the heavens. It was a strange thing for Israel, whose turning away from Jehovah had brought it about.
The letter does not stop at a general name for God. Later on the king becomes more specific, and one writer asks how deep his knowledge really went.
They had a certain fear of God, but no living faith. Like his grandfather Darius, Artaxerxes acknowledged the God of heaven... but in his decree Artaxerxes goes further: he acknowledges the God of Ezra (v. 14), the God of Israel (v. 15), and the God of Jerusalem (v. 19). He also acknowledges his responsibility toward this God whose wrath is to be feared (v. 23).
Another writer reads the same letter more hopefully, so commentators differ here.
Though he was a Gentile, it would almost seem that he was in full fellowship with Ezra's object. And from his confession of Jehovah as the God of heaven (vv. 21, 23), it is not impossible that grace had visited his heart.
The king addresses Ezra by the one title that mattered. Ezra held two positions, and he came by them in two very different ways.
He became a priest by birth and consecration. But he became "a scribe skilled in the Law of Moses that the LORD, the God of Israel, had given" only by personal study of the Word. So inherited office, even among the Jews, could not give a man the qualifications for doing the work. Those could only come from personal time with God in the Scriptures.
The greeting of the letter is itself the lesson. God chooses whom He will to carry out what He intends.
The lesson lies on the surface. God is sovereign in the choice of His instruments. He does according to His will among the inhabitants of the earth as in the army of heaven, and none can stop His hand, or say to Him, "What are you doing?" Our chapter illustrates this. "Artaxerxes, king of kings," and "Ezra the priest, a scribe of the law of God," are yoked together to carry out God's thoughts for His people and for His house in Jerusalem.
- Cause — Israel's apostasy is why the letter exists. God set His people aside as "not my people." He stepped back from acting as God of the earth and handed world power to the Gentiles.
- Title — "The God of heaven" is the name that fits those times. A Persian king uses it, and it marks both God's unchanged supremacy and Israel's lost place on earth.
- Instrument — God chooses whom He will. He yokes a Persian king and a Jewish priest together to serve His purpose for His house.
- Qualification — Ezra's priesthood came by birth; his knowledge of the law came only by personal study. A man can inherit an office. He can never inherit fitness for it.
- Result — Under the authority of a foreign crown, God's word goes back to Jerusalem. Nothing in the king's greeting is outside God's hand.
I have given orders that all they of the people of Israel, and of their priests and the Levites, in my realm, who are disposed to go to Jerusalem, go with thee.
In Ezra 7:13 a Persian king throws a door open. Any Israelite, priest or Levite in his empire may travel with Ezra to Jerusalem, if he wants to go. The permission is real. But God's people now need a foreign king's signature to go home. Even then, only willing hearts will use it.
The verse dates the decree to a Persian king's reign. Commentators read that detail as a sign of where power now sat.
Notice again that the signs are everywhere: governmental power on earth has passed from the Jew to the Gentile. The date of Ezra's mission is "in the reign of Artaxerxes king of Persia," and the king sets out his commission for the work at length (vv. 11-26). This proves that God's people were at this time under the authority of the Gentiles. It also proves that God Himself always recognises the powers that have their source in His own sovereign appointment.
God moved Ezra to take up this work. Yet the authority to send him sat with a foreign throne.
God puts it into the heart of Ezra, a scribe skilled in the law of Moses, to think of the remnant in Jerusalem. He puts it into his heart to seek the law of the LORD, to teach it and to see it obeyed. Here again it is still the Gentile king who sends him for this purpose to Jerusalem. All blessing is of God. But when it comes to authority, nothing comes directly from God — except prophecy, in which God was sovereign. He could not leave unrecognised the throne He had Himself set up among the Gentiles on the earth. And Israel was an earthly people.
The decree reads like the work of a man who feared Israel's God.
As you read through these verses, you cannot help being struck by the wonderful work of God in the mind of a pagan king. That work led him to grant such powers, to order such help, and to express such a recognition of the claims and greatness of "the God of heaven". We also see the over-ruling wisdom of God controlling the king's mind. So the king gave God's servant liberty, and even commanded him to do what God proposed.
This was not the first such offer.
Cyrus, as seen in Ezra 1, had also granted the same privilege. Now, many years later, the Spirit of God works through the king once again to deliver His people. But there was to be no human force. If any man went up, it must be his own free choice, for God would have willing servants. If any pressure moved him, it must be only the pressure of the Holy Spirit.
A generous decree did not produce a crowd.
In view of the magnificent decree and liberality of Artaxerxes, the company was very small. The majority preferred Babylon, and remained there. The faithful ones are known to God, and their names are here written forever in His Word. The Gentile king had given the decree, and the people had all the means they needed. Even so, the undertaking was one of faith. They came out of Babylon trusting the LORD; they marched on in faith.
An earlier invitation had worked the same way. Its open wording sorted people by what they loved.
Worded this way, the proclamation meant that those who responded would mostly be men of piety. Their hearts were alive to the glory of God and to the place of His Name. The more worldly-minded and selfish would rather stay in the comfortable homes they had built during the seventy years of captivity. They would leave the task to others who were ready to face the difficulties and hardships.
So what did those who went up gain?
I think this work of God through Ezra's mission is a touching proof of His loving-kindness. It fitted the needs of the people exactly. It was not power. That had been removed to another place. It was the knowledge of the will and the ordinances of God — of the mind of God in the word.
- Willing, not forced. The decree set no quota and named no one: "there was to be no human force… for God would have willing servants."
- Willing hearts, moved by God. The liberty came through a king's pen. But God moved both the king's mind and the hearts that answered.
- Willingness sifts. Wide-open wording lets love decide; those alive to God's glory go, the comfortable stay.
- Willingness costs. Even with royal funding, the journey was a step of faith. Most chose to stay in Babylon.
- Willingness aims at the Word. What the volunteers gained was not restored power but the mind of God in His word — exactly suited to their need.
Because thou art sent by the king, and by his seven counsellors, to inquire concerning Judah and Jerusalem, according to the law of thy God which is in thy hand;
Ezra 7:14 sits inside a letter that Artaxerxes, ruler of the Persian empire, handed to Ezra before he left Babylon for Jerusalem. A foreign court sends a priest and scribe to look into the state of Judah — and tells him to measure it by the law of his own God, carried in his own hand.
The striking thing is who issued this commission. One writer draws out the lesson:
We cannot help noticing that this Gentile ruler refers everything to the will of God. To put it more exactly, he directs that everything should be ordered in subjection to that will... From his confession of the LORD as the God of heaven (vv. 21, 23), it is not impossible that grace had visited his heart... The lesson lies on the surface. God is sovereign in the choice of His instruments. He does according to His will among the inhabitants of the earth as in the army of heaven. None can stop His hand or say to Him, "What are you doing?" We see an illustration of this in our chapter: "Artaxerxes, king of kings," and "Ezra the priest, a scribe of the law of God," are yoked together for carrying out God's thoughts for His people and for His house in Jerusalem.
The powers granted went well beyond what a foreign official could normally expect. Another writer reads the king's generosity as evidence of something working behind the throne:
As one reads through these verses, one cannot help being struck by the wonderful work of God in the mind of a pagan king, which led him to grant such powers, to order such help to be given, and to express such recognition of the claims and greatness of "the God of heaven". We also see the over-ruling wisdom of God controlling the mind of the king, so that His servant was given liberty — and even commanded — to do what God intended.
The verse ties the inquiry to something else. One survey of the chapter notes what went with Ezra:
He was not sent empty-handed to inquire about Judah and Jerusalem. The king and his seven counsellors offered gifts to the God of Israel of their own free will, because he was to inquire "according to the law of his God which was in his hand" — a remarkable testimony from such a source.
One commentator tracks how far the king's knowledge of God went, and where it stopped:
The decree of Artaxerxes... shows us the mental attitude of the rulers of Persia. They had a certain fear of God, but without living faith... Although he allowed, as history tells us, each people to keep their idols, he himself had none... Without doubt their religion disposed them to acknowledge the "God of the heavens". But in his decree Artaxerxes goes further. He acknowledges the God of Ezra (v. 14), the God of Israel (v. 15), and the God of Jerusalem (v. 19). He also owns that he is responsible to this God, and that His anger is to be feared (v. 23).
Commentators differ here. Dennett thinks grace may have touched the king's heart. Rossier stops at a fear of God without living faith.
Why was the law "in your hand" at all? A few verses earlier we read what Ezra did first:
He prepared his heart to seek it first, and then to do it. He himself did not separate practice from knowledge. He was not like the teachers of the law in the days of Jesus. They laid on people "burdens hard to bear", and would not touch the burdens with one of their fingers. The precepts of the Word he fed on soaked into his daily life. Only after this did he set his heart "to teach in Israel statutes and ordinances."
The sequence explains the royal letter rather than the other way round. The open door came second:
In the book we are considering, king Artaxerxes is a picture of one who sets an open door before Ezra. Yes — but Ezra's heart was set to do the will of God. God works all outward circumstances. He opens the way when our heart is inwardly set to do the right thing in the sight of the Lord. We have no ground ever to complain of circumstances if only our heart is right with the Lord. The Lord can and will take care of everything else.
There is a shadow over all this favour. One summary of the chapter names both sides at once:
Ezra the priest went up from Babylon, and with him other Israelites of every rank. He went by the king's favour, with freewill offerings and with authority for everything he needed for the house of his God, and for instructing and judging the Jews. It was a witness both of God's mercy through the Gentile king, and of the abnormal position of Israel.
- Hand — the law is "in your hand" because Ezra first sought it, then did it, then taught it.
- Heart — the open door came after the settled heart. When the heart is set right, God arranges the outward circumstances.
- Throne — a foreign king and a Jewish scribe are yoked together for God's purpose. God chooses His instruments, and no one can stop His hand.
- Reach — the decree moves from "God of heaven" to the God of Ezra, of Israel, of Jerusalem. Yet it stays a fear of God, not living faith.
- Reminder — the king's favour was real mercy. But needing a foreign king's letter showed how far from normal Israel's position had become.
and to carry the silver and gold which the king and his counsellors have freely offered to the God of Israel, whose habitation is at Jerusalem,
Ezra 7:15 sits inside a letter from a Persian king. It records something unexpected: a foreign ruler and his advisers hand over silver and gold as a gift to the God of Israel. How did a pagan court come to pay for the worship of a scattered, conquered people? And who was really behind it?
The letter reads like the act of a generous king. One commentator traces it back further, and points out how often God is named in this Persian state document.
There can be no question that God moved Artaxerxes in all he did... This document keeps using the name of God, the law of God, the house of God. Then the king and his seven counsellors freely gave silver and gold "to the God of Israel, whose dwelling is in Jerusalem." In a future day, when all Israel is saved, when Christ comes again, the Gentiles and their kings will offer their silver and gold (Isaiah 60; Ps. 62:10-11).
So the gift is an early sample of what Isaiah and the Psalms promise on a far larger scale.
The word "freely" covers the whole decree: both the people who travelled and the money they carried.
First comes the greeting, and it shows that Ezra was a true witness among the Gentiles. Then the king decrees that "all those of the people of Israel, and His priests and Levites, in my realm, who freely choose to go up to Jerusalem, may go with you."... But no human force was to be used. If any man went up, it must be his own choice, for God would have willing servants. Any constraint must come only from the Holy Spirit... He was also to take charge of the silver and gold which the king and his counsellors had freely offered to the God of Israel.
The source of the money is what makes this striking.
Nor was he sent empty-handed to ask about Judah and Jerusalem. The king and his seven counsellors freely offered to the God of Israel... a remarkable testimony from such a source.
The order of spending matters too.
They were to carry the silver and gold given by the king and his counselors, and the silver and gold given to them in all the province of Babylon. These were freewill offerings for the house of God in Jerusalem (vv. 15-16). So the king told Ezra to take care to buy bulls, rams and lambs with this money, along with grain offerings and drink offerings, for the altar of the house of God in Jerusalem (v. 17). It is good to see that the king's first priority was what honored God. All these offerings symbolize Christ in some special way.
The gift ties a Gentile king — a ruler outside Israel — to a scribe of God's law. One commentator finds the chapter's main lesson in that pairing.
We cannot miss how this Gentile king refers everything to the will of God... It would almost seem, Gentile though he was, that he shared Ezra's aim fully. He confesses Jehovah as the God of heaven (vv. 21, 23), so it is not impossible that grace had visited his heart... The lesson lies on the surface. God is sovereign in the choice of His instruments. He does as He wills among the people of the earth as among the army of heaven, and no one can stop His hand, or say to Him, "What are You doing?" Our chapter shows it: "Artaxerxes, king of kings," and "Ezra the priest, a scribe of the law of God," are harnessed together to carry out God's thoughts for His people and for His house in Jerusalem.
Dennett stops short of claiming the king was converted.
Ezra copies out the royal letter, then names the one he thinks is really behind it.
Ezra himself is filled with worship as he thinks about the wonder-working power of his God's hand. Having written down the king's letter, he breaks out in praise: "Blessed be the Lord God of our fathers, who has put such a thing as this in the king's heart, to beautify the house of the Lord that is in Jerusalem."
- Heart. The gift starts in a heart God touched. God moved Artaxerxes "in all he did," so the gift is God's work before it is the king's.
- Free. No one was forced. The travellers went by their own free choice and the money was "freely offered," because "God would have willing servants."
- First. The silver and gold went to the altar first, because "the king's first priority was what honored God."
- Reach. God works outside Israel too. "Artaxerxes, king of kings," and a scribe of God's law are "harnessed together to carry out God's thoughts."
- Praise. Ezra closes the circle. He blesses the God "who has put such a thing as this in the king's heart," crediting God, not Persia.
and all the silver and gold that thou canst find in all the province of Babylon, besides the voluntary offering of the people, and of the priests, who offer willingly for the house of their God which is at Jerusalem.
Ezra carries three streams of wealth from Babylon to Jerusalem. The Persian king and his advisers give. More comes from across the province of Babylonia. Israelites still living there add their own offerings. It all has one address — the house of God in Jerusalem. Why would a foreign king fund the worship of Israel's God? And what makes a gift a "freewill offering"?
The letter reads like royal generosity. Reading the whole decree, one writer is struck less by the king than by the hand moving him:
As you read through these verses, you cannot help being struck by the wonderful work of God in the mind of a pagan king. It led him to grant such powers, to order such help, and to express such a recognition of the claims and greatness of "the God of heaven." We also see the overruling wisdom of God controlling the king's mind, so that the king gave God's servant liberty and even commanded him to do what God proposed.
Ezra's errand was to look into the state of Judah and Jerusalem. One commentator notes where his funding came from:
He was not sent empty-handed to inquire about Judah and Jerusalem. The king and his seven counsellors freely offered gifts to the God of Israel, since Ezra was to inquire "according to the law of his God which was in his hand." That is a remarkable testimony from such a source.
The temple's supplies now arrive by permission of a foreign court. One writer sees both mercy and something out of place in this:
In the seventh year of Artaxerxes Longimanus, Ezra the priest went up from Babylon. Other Israelites of all ranks went with him, by the king's favour, and with freewill offerings. Ezra carried authority for all he wanted for the house of his God, and for teaching and judging the Jews. It is a witness both of divine mercy through the Gentile, and of the abnormal position of Israel.
The people and the priests gave willingly too. One commentator traces where such willingness comes from:
"My people shall be willing" (Psalm 110). "Willing" and "liberal" are the same word… Again, in 2 Corinthians 8:5, Gentiles had been made willing — "they gave themselves first to the Lord." They are recognised and owned by the Lord, and then the generosity comes. Grace worked it in them, and God calls it their own voluntary will — "every man according as he purposes in his heart" (2 Corinthians 9:7).
The gifts were not a general fund. The decree names what the silver must buy:
It was by the king's authority, and they were to carry the silver and gold given by the king and his counselors, along with the silver and gold given them in all the province of Babylon — freewill offerings for the house of God in Jerusalem (vv. 15-16). So Ezra was told to be careful to buy with this money bulls, rams and lambs, with grain offerings and drink offerings, to be offered on the altar of the house of God in Jerusalem (v. 17). It is good to see that the king's first priority was what was for God's honour. All these offerings symbolize Christ in some special way.
A pagan king's letter calls Jerusalem the dwelling place of the God of Israel. One commentator sees an early sample of a much larger day:
Then the King and his seven counsellors freely gave silver and gold "to the God of Israel, whose dwelling is in Jerusalem." In a future day, when all Israel is saved and Christ comes again, the Gentiles and their kings will offer their silver and gold (Isaiah 60; Psalm 62:10-11). Artaxerxes and his counsellors were not the only givers. Non-Jews and the Jewish residents of Babylon brought offerings too.
- God moves first. The powers, the funds and the recognition of "the God of heaven" came from a foreign king's pen. Behind that pen was God's overruling wisdom, moving the king to command what God already intended.
- Then the king gives. Ezra did not travel empty-handed. A Persian court giving to the God of Israel is a remarkable testimony from such a source.
- Then the people give. Willingness and liberality are one idea. Grace produces the generosity, and God still calls it the giver's own choice.
- It all lands on the altar. The king's first priority was God's honour. The silver bought bulls, rams and lambs for the altar, and each one pictures Christ.
- And it previews more. Gentile silver and gold flows to Jerusalem here. It is a small sample of the day when the nations and their kings will bring their wealth to the God of Israel.
Therefore thou shalt buy diligently with this money bullocks, rams, lambs, with their oblations and their drink-offerings, and offer them upon the altar of the house of your God which is at Jerusalem.
In his letter, the Persian king Artaxerxes hands Ezra public money and names the first purchase: animals for sacrifice, for the altar in Jerusalem. Why would a foreign court pay for Israel's worship, and why did the animals come before every other cost?
The decree came from a foreign king. One writer points to the hand behind it.
As one reads through these verses, one cannot help being struck by the wonderful work of God in the mind of a pagan king. That work led him to grant such powers, to order such help, and to express such a recognition of the claims and greatness of "the God of heaven". We also see the over-ruling wisdom of God controlling the mind of the king, so that His servant was free — and even under orders — to do what God proposed.
The king's letter fixes the order of spending. One writer notes what comes first.
The king instructed Ezra to buy bulls, rams and lambs with this money, with care, along with grain offerings and drink offerings. These were to be offered on the altar of the house of God in Jerusalem (v. 17). It is good to see that the king's first priority was that which was for God's honour. All these offerings picture Christ in some special way.
The king let Israelites travel to Jerusalem with Ezra. One writer notes that no one was pushed into going.
Cyrus, as seen in Ezra 1, had also granted this same privilege of going up to Jerusalem. Now, after many years, the Spirit of God works again, through the king, to deliver His people. But no human force was to be used: if any man went up, it must be by his own will, for God would have willing servants. Any constraint must be only that of the Holy Spirit.
The verse names bulls, rams and lambs. One writer, looking at a burnt offering of seven lambs, one bull and two rams, draws out what each animal pictures.
The seven lambs of the first year without blemish tell of the perfect sacrifice of the Lord Jesus as the Lamb of God. … The bullock, as the largest animal offered in sacrifice, may symbolise energy and devotedness, while the ram speaks of consecration.
The grain offering matched the animal it went with. One writer draws meaning from the exact amounts. An ephah was a dry measure of grain.
Change is only in the number of each of the first three animals. The meal-offering that goes with them stays in constant proportion: one tenth of an ephah for a lamb, two tenths for a ram, three for a bullock. So our grasp of Christ's person grows with our grasp of His work, if this is real. Drink-offerings accompany the rest also in due proportion.
Drink offerings appear only a handful of times in Israel's story. One writer notes that this verse is the last of them, and what it is tied to.
Ezra 7:17 is the last of the historical references to the drink offering and again speaks of revival in Judah. This revival is not tied to the restoration of temple worship, as in 2 Chronicles 29 and again in Ezra 1-6. It is tied to Ezra's mission, which was "to teach his statutes and rules in Israel" (Ezra 7:10). This was not achieved at once, because Ezra did not instruct the people in God's word until Nehemiah 8.
A foreign king's silver and gold went to Jerusalem for the house of God. One writer sees in this a preview of a far greater day.
Then the king and his seven counsellors freely gave silver and gold "to the God of Israel, whose dwelling is in Jerusalem." In a future day all Israel will be saved and Christ will come again. Then the nations and their kings will offer their silver and gold (Isaiah 60; Psalm 62:10-11).
- Given — the silver and gold came from a foreign king, not from Israel. God was at work in his mind, so the king granted, and even ordered, what God had already purposed.
- Spent — the altar had the first claim on the money. God's honour came first, and every animal named pictures Christ.
- Willing — the king and his counsellors gave freely, and the travellers went by their own choice. God would have willing servants, and the only pressure allowed was the Holy Spirit's.
- Measured — bull, ram and lamb each carry their own meaning. The grain and drink offerings grow with the animal, so our grasp of Christ's person keeps pace with our grasp of His work.
- Ahead — this is the last drink offering in Israel's story, and it belongs to Ezra's teaching mission. A foreign king's gold at Jerusalem points to the day when the nations and their kings offer their silver and gold.
And whatever shall seem good to thee and to thy brethren to do with the rest of the silver and the gold, that do according to the will of your God.
Ezra 7:18 sits inside a letter from a Persian king, who hands Ezra silver and gold for the temple in Jerusalem. After naming the sacrifices to be bought, Artaxerxes leaves the rest to Ezra's judgment — and the standard he sets is not royal policy but the will of Ezra's God.
The decree is remarkable for who wrote it. A foreign king fills his official letter with the God of Israel, and one writer sees God moving him.
There can be no question that God moved Artaxerxes in all he did. The decree states that any Israelites, priests and Levites in his kingdom who are willing to go up to Jerusalem of their own free will may go with Ezra. This document uses the name of God, the law of God and the house of God again and again.
One writer traces how far the king's acknowledgement goes through the letter, while also being honest about its limits.
They had a certain fear of God, but no living faith… In his decree, Artaxerxes goes further. He acknowledges the God of Ezra (v. 14), the God of Israel (v. 15), and the God of Jerusalem (v. 19). He also admits that he is responsible to this God, whose wrath should be feared (v. 23).
The phrase "according to the will of your God" is not a closing flourish. The king applies that measure to everything he authorises, and one writer draws a lesson from it.
We cannot help noticing that this Gentile king refers everything to the will of God. To put it more exactly, he directs that everything be ordered in subjection to that will… The lesson lies on the surface. God is sovereign in His choice of instruments. He does according to His will among the inhabitants of the earth as in the army of heaven, and no one can hold back His hand, or say to Him, What are You doing?
Verse 18 only makes sense after verse 17. The king set the money aside first for sacrifices on the altar. Only what was left came under Ezra's judgment.
It is good to see that the king's first priority was what honored God… So, if God had His place first, the king was confident he could depend on Ezra to use the rest of the silver and gold well. He told Ezra he could act in this as "seems good to you," and "according to the will of your God" (v. 18).
Artaxerxes did not micromanage. The powers he handed Ezra went well beyond this one decision.
Ezra, we see, was given remarkable authority. The king took it for granted that he would act, as he said, "according to the wisdom of your God." He freed Ezra and his helpers from every form of tax or payment, and gave them power to punish all evildoers… So, in the providence of God, the king commissioned Ezra to go up to the land armed with remarkable powers.
A man left to decide "as seems good" needs more than good intentions. One writer names what kept Ezra on course.
To follow this path of obedience without turning aside from it, Ezra needed a special knowledge of the whole body of Scripture… Often nothing is more deadly to souls than a shallow, limited knowledge of the Word… To take one truth apart from the other truths that go with it, and to leave those out of account, is usually a proof of ignorance and self-will.
Believers meet the same pattern today. God leaves some matters open, and one writer says why.
The Lord's purpose is clearly to leave many things to the prayerful exercise of His saints. They must search the Scriptures to find what pleases Him, and judge by comparing how He acted in days past. In this way they grow, with their senses trained to tell good from evil. In such matters each of us must seek to find out God's will and be fully persuaded in our own minds.
The gifts would make the house more beautiful. One writer names a finer adornment that no treasury could supply.
The silver and gold and other gifts from the treasuries would no doubt be used to increase the natural beauty of the house being built. But we venture to think that the teaching of the law, which Ezra planned to do, would produce godliness in the people, if they received it. That adorns any house more than any amount of silver and gold can.
- Moved — a foreign ruler with no living faith still fills his decree with the God of Israel, because God stirred him.
- Measured — the king puts everything in his letter under God's will; God works His purposes on earth, and no one can stop His hand.
- Ordered — the altar gets its portion first; only what is left falls to human judgment.
- Trusted — God gives freedom to a man who knows the whole of Scripture; a shallow knowledge of the Word breeds self-will.
- Beautified — silver and gold adorn the building, but God's truth received by the people adorns it far more.
And the vessels that have been given thee for the service of the house of thy God, deliver before the God of Jerusalem.
This verse comes from a Persian king's letter to Ezra, a Jewish priest, about gold and silver objects for worship in Jerusalem. Two questions follow: why is a foreign king handling the vessels of God's house, and what does it mean to hand them over before the God of Jerusalem?
The verse is not Ezra speaking. It is part of the king's own letter, and one writer sees in that a shift in who holds power.
The signs of the transfer of governmental power in the earth from the Jew to the Gentile are everywhere apparent. So the date of Ezra's mission is given as "in the reign of Artaxerxes king of Persia," and his commission for his work from the king is set out at length (vv. 11-26). This proves that God's people were at this time under the authority of the Gentiles, and that God Himself always recognises the powers which have their source in His own sovereign appointment.
The title the king uses in this verse is unusual, and it is one step in a series of confessions running through his decree.
The decree of Artaxerxes, as well as the letter of Darius (Ezra 6), shows us the state of mind of the rulers of Persia. They had a certain fear of God, but without living faith. Like his grandfather Darius, Artaxerxes acknowledged the God of heaven. He let each people keep their idols, as history tells us, but he himself had none... No doubt this disposed them to acknowledge the "God of the heavens". But in his decree Artaxerxes goes further: he acknowledges the God of Ezra (v. 14), the God of Israel (v. 15), and the God of Jerusalem (v. 19). He also acknowledges his responsibility toward this God whose wrath is to be feared (v. 23).
The letter keeps naming God, and one writer links the king's gift to a day still ahead.
There can be no question that Artaxerxes was divinely moved in all he did... The name of God, the law of God, the house of God are constantly used in this document. Then the king and his seven counsellors freely gave silver and gold "to the God of Israel, whose dwelling is in Jerusalem." In a future day, when all Israel is saved, when Christ comes again, the Gentiles and their kings will offer their silver and gold (Isaiah 60; Psalm 62:10-11).
Notice the order. God has His place first; only then does Ezra have freedom over what is left.
If God was given His place first, the king had confidence that he could depend on Ezra to use the rest of the silver and gold rightly. He told him he could act in this as "seems good to you," and "according to the will of your God" (v. 18). Ezra was entrusted with articles for the service of the temple, and he was to deliver them in full before the God of Jerusalem (v. 19).
The vessels were holy, and so the character of the men who carried them mattered.
These gifts were sanctified by the name of the Lord and by the character of those who kept them... These gifts, coming in large part from the king, counsellors and princes, were not defiled in any way. Since the name of the Lord and His temple had been recognised by these men, God could take pleasure in their offerings. But even for these material gifts, whether silver or gold, the priests had to watch over them and guard them, for nothing must be lost. The men entrusted with this deposit must show absolute faithfulness and integrity. In the day of grace we see the apostle Paul show the same strict care in watching over the deposit given to him by the assemblies of Gentile believers for the saints at Jerusalem (2 Cor. 8:20).
The same writer turns this into a rule for anyone holding something on God's behalf.
May we copy them in the responsibilities, great or small, which the Lord entrusts to us. May we never treat anything He puts into our hand as our own. It is to be given back to Him, after we have managed it faithfully for Him.
- Entrusted, not owned. The vessels are "given" to Ezra, yet they are for God's house — what comes into a servant's hand is to be handed on, not kept.
- Entrusted by a Gentile. The commission comes in a Persian king's letter. Governmental power in the earth had passed from the Jew to the Gentile.
- Entrusted by God behind the king. Artaxerxes names the God of Ezra, of Israel, and of Jerusalem. Commentators say God moved him, though his fear of God had no living faith in it.
- Entrusted in order of priority. Sacrifice and the temple vessels are settled first; only the remainder is left to Ezra's discretion, and even that "according to the will of your God."
- Entrusted to clean hands. Holy vessels need carriers of absolute faithfulness. Nothing is lost, and everything goes back to Him.
And whatever more shall be needful for the house of thy God which thou shalt have occasion to bestow, bestow it out of the king's treasure house.
One line in a Persian king's letter puts the royal treasury behind the temple in Jerusalem. Whatever else the house of God needs, Ezra may draw on it — and Ezra decides what that is. Why would a foreign ruler sign such a blank cheque, and what does it say about a people who needed his money?
The verse is the open-ended clause of the decree. The king promised to cover any cost left over. He also named the officials who would pay.
The king instructed that anything more needed for furnishing the temple should come from the king's treasury (v. 20). A further decree went to all the treasurers on Israel's side of the River Euphrates. They were to give Ezra whatever he asked for. It limited the silver to 100 talents, the wheat to 100 cors, and the wine and oil to 100 baths each. There was no limit on the salt (vv. 21-22).
The king did not worship the God of Israel. Commentators trace his generosity past the man who signed it.
As you read through these verses, you cannot help being struck by the wonderful work of God in the mind of a pagan king. It led him to grant such powers, to order such help, and to voice such recognition of the claims and greatness of "the God of heaven". We also see the overruling wisdom of God controlling the mind of the king, so that the king gave His servant liberty — and even commanded him — to do what God proposed.
The same note sounds all through the letter. The king keeps pointing past himself to God.
You cannot fail to notice that this Gentile king refers everything to the will of God. Or, more exactly, he gives orders that everything must be subject to that will.
A king and a scribe are pulling the same load, and the reason lies outside them both.
The lesson lies on the surface. God is sovereign in the choice of His instruments. He does according to His will among the people of the earth as in the army of heaven. No one can stop His hand or say to Him, What are you doing? Our chapter shows it. "Artaxerxes, king of kings," and "Ezra the priest, a scribe of the law of God," are yoked together to carry out God's thoughts for His people and for His house in Jerusalem.
There is a shadow over the generosity. The temple now ran on a foreign budget, and that said something about Israel's standing.
The people were now under Gentile rule. They owed the Gentile for permission to live in the land of their fathers, and to keep the laws and do the service of their God. They were subjects of the Persian, and their ruler was his deputy.
Money can make a building beautiful. Writers point to something that beautifies it more.
It was all "to beautify the house of the Lord". The silver and gold and other gifts out of the treasuries would no doubt add to the natural beauty of the house they were building. But we think the teaching of the law, which Ezra planned to do, would produce a piety in the people, if they received it. That piety adorns any house more than any amount of silver and gold ever could.
Ezra had asked the king for something, and the king had said yes. When he writes it up, he credits neither his request nor his standing at court.
It was not his request that moved the king to act; it was God who put the thing into the king's heart. It was not Ezra's influence that won him favour with the king and his princes; it was God who extended mercy to him in their presence. He did not gather the chief men to go up with him by his own power; it was God who strengthened him with His own hand upon him.
- Need. The decree covered whatever else the temple needed. Named treasurers had to pay, up to fixed limits.
- Source. The gift came through a foreign king. Writers trace it to God at work in his mind, and the king's own letter bows to the will of God.
- Instrument. God chooses whom He will. He yoked a Persian emperor and a Jewish scribe to one purpose neither of them began.
- Humility. Funding is not the same as freedom. Leaning on a Gentile treasury marked the people as subjects, not a free nation.
- Result. Silver made the building beautiful. The law taught and received beautifies it more. Ezra took no credit, tracing his request, his favour and his strength to God's hand.
And I, I Artaxerxes the king, do give orders to all the treasurers that are beyond the river, that whatever Ezra the priest and scribe of the law of the God of the heavens shall require of you, it be done diligently,
Ezra 7:21 comes from a Persian king's official letter, ordering his treasurers west of the Euphrates to give Ezra whatever he asks for. Why would a foreign ruler call Israel's God "the God of heaven," and who was moving his pen?
The letter did three things at once.
The king's letter of authorization empowered Ezra to act. It defined the aim of his mission. And through the king's treasurers beyond the river, it supplied the means to carry out his service in setting the house of Jehovah in order.
The next verse sets limits on this open-ended order — with one exception.
The king issued a decree to all the treasurers on Israel's side of the River Euphrates. They were to give Ezra whatever he might need. The only limits were 100 talents of silver, 100 cors of wheat, and 100 baths each of wine and oil — with no limit to the salt (vv. 21-22).
The same letter also cancelled the taxes that earlier officials had once used as an argument against the Jews.
More than this, the king ruled that no one could lawfully impose tax, tribute or custom on any of the priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers, temple servants or servants of the house of God (v. 24). Rehum and Shimshai had once urged an earlier Artaxerxes to stop the Jews from building, claiming that the Jews would not pay tax, tribute or custom (ch. 4:9-13). Now the king was ready to give up these payments for the heads of Israel, so that Judah would prosper.
Commentators differ on what was going on inside Artaxerxes. One sees in his words a possible sign of grace at work.
We cannot fail to notice that this Gentile king refers everything to the will of God — or more precisely, that he directs everything to be ordered in subjection to that will. Gentile though he was, he almost seems to be in full fellowship with Ezra's aim. And from his confession of Jehovah as the God of heaven (vv. 21, 23), it is not impossible that grace had visited his heart.
Another writer sees respect without faith, and notes how the king's words grow more specific.
They had a certain fear of God, but without living faith. Like his grandfather Darius, Artaxerxes acknowledged the God of heaven… but in his decree he goes further. He acknowledges the God of Ezra (v. 14), the God of Israel (v. 15), and the God of Jerusalem (v. 19). He also acknowledges his responsibility toward this God whose wrath is to be feared (v. 23).
The verse calls Ezra "the scribe of the Law of the God of heaven." But his gift alone was not what qualified him.
God had prepared him beforehand, as a special gift, to be the leader of His people. But that was not enough to qualify him for his ministry: "Ezra had directed his heart to seek the law of Jehovah, and to do it" (v. 10). He prepared his heart to seek it first, and then to do it. For his own part, he did not separate practice from knowledge… The precepts of the Word he fed on soaked through his daily life. Only after this did he set his heart "to teach in Israel statutes and ordinances."
Ezra credits none of this to his own standing at court.
He traced everything up to God. He lost sight of himself, and to his soul God was all and in all. It was not his asking (v. 6) that moved the king to act; it was God who put the thing into the king's heart. It was not Ezra's influence that commended him to the king and his princes; it was God who extended mercy to him in their presence. It was not by his own power that he gathered the chief men to go up with him; it was God who strengthened him with His own hand upon him.
The gifts would add to the beauty of the house. One writer points to a greater adornment.
The silver and gold and other gifts out of the treasuries would doubtless increase the natural beauty of the house being built. But we venture to think that the teaching of the law, which Ezra planned to do, would produce a piety in the people, if they received it. And piety adorns any house more than any amount of silver and gold can.
- Heart first. Ezra set his heart to seek God's law, to do it, and then to teach it — the order that made him fit to be trusted.
- Then the hand. God put the thing into the king's heart. The decree, the favour and the strength all came from Him, not from Ezra's influence.
- Then the treasury. One letter empowered Ezra to act, defined his mission, and paid for it from the province's own funds.
- Then the limits. The king capped the silver, wheat, wine and oil; only salt had no limit, and he freed the temple workers from tax.
- Then the beauty. The gifts would adorn God's house, yet a people taught the Word adorn it more than silver ever could.
unto a hundred talents of silver, and to a hundred measures of wheat, and to a hundred baths of wine, and to a hundred baths of oil, and salt without prescribing [how much].
Artaxerxes has just told his treasurers west of the Euphrates to give Ezra whatever he asks for the temple. Now he sets the ceiling. Silver, wheat, wine and oil are each capped at a hundred. Salt gets no figure at all. Why does a Persian king pay for the worship of Israel's God? Why these four goods? And why is salt the one item left uncounted?
This verse is the fine print of a royal order:
The king instructed that the king's treasury would supply anything more the temple needed for its furnishing (v. 20). A decree backed this up. It went to all the treasurers on Israel's side of the River Euphrates, telling them to give Ezra whatever he might need. It limited only the silver, to 100 talents, the wheat to 100 cors, and the wine and oil to 100 baths each. There was no limit to the salt (vv. 21-22).
The funding was not a private favour. The empire's own system carried it:
The king gave Ezra a letter of authorization. It empowered him to act. It defined the object of his mission. And through the king's treasurers beyond the river, it provided the means for carrying out his service in the ordering of the house of Jehovah.
The list is not a supply of food for Ezra's party. These are the raw materials of Israel's sacrifices. An earlier Persian decree had already named the same four goods. One writer matches each item to its offering:
The material mentioned was for the sacrifices and offerings. Young bulls, rams and lambs for the burnt offerings. Wheat, oil and salt for the meal offering, and wine for the drink offering. All these things were to be given to the priests without fail day by day.
So the hundred cors and baths are altar supplies. A foreign treasury now kept the fire burning in Jerusalem.
This gap is not unique to Artaxerxes' order:
"Salt without prescribing how much" (Ezra 7:22).
What salt stood for explains the missing number:
Salt meant the very opposite of leaven. It was the symbol of what opposes corruption. So it was the type of what endures, and of the holiness that the "covenant of God" implies. A holy God can only go on with what is holy, and therefore salt is the "salt of His covenant." So it was never to be missing from any offering.
Silver can be counted. Holiness cannot.
The letter does more than release supplies:
You cannot fail to notice that this Gentile king refers everything to the will of God. To say it more exactly, he directs that everything be ordered in subjection to that will. Gentile though he was, he almost seems to be in full fellowship with the aim of Ezra. And from the confession of Jehovah as the God of heaven (vv. 21, 23), it is not impossible that grace had visited his heart. … The lesson lies on the surface: God is sovereign in His choice of instruments, and none can stay His hand. In this chapter "Artaxerxes, king of kings" and "Ezra the priest, a scribe of the law of God" are yoked together to carry out God's thoughts for His people and for His house in Jerusalem.
Commentators differ on how far to press this. One reads the decree as a sign of God's hidden control rather than of the king's faith:
We cannot help being struck by the wonderful work of God in the mind of a pagan king, which led him to grant such powers.
Ezra had asked the king for this (v. 6). Yet in his own account, the credit goes elsewhere:
So it was not his own asking (v. 6) that led the king to act. It was God who put the thing into the king's heart. It was not Ezra's influence that commended him to the king and his princes. It was God who extended mercy to him in their presence. It was not in his own power that he assembled the chief men to go up with him. It was God who strengthened him with His own hand upon him.
- Heart — It starts with God working in a king's mind. That is why the empire's own treasurers paid for the worship of Israel's God.
- Gift — The hundred talents, cors and baths were not travel money. They were altar material: wheat, oil and salt for the meal offering, wine for the drink offering.
- Measure — The king put a number on the silver, wheat, wine and oil. Only these carried a ceiling.
- Salt — Only salt went uncapped, and Scripture never fixes its amount anywhere. It stands for what resists corruption and endures, and it was never to be missing from any offering.
- Praise — Ezra received it all as God's doing, not his own: he had asked the king, but he thanked God.
Whatever is commanded by the God of the heavens, let it be carefully done for the house of the God of the heavens; for why should there be wrath against the realm of the king and his sons?
Artaxerxes has already backed Ezra with a royal decree, and now he adds a strange order: do all that the God of heaven asks, or wrath may fall on the king and his sons. The questions here are about the king, not Ezra: what did he understand, what did he fear, and who put such words in his mouth?
How much real faith stood behind this decree? The king names God three times over, yet one thing is missing.
The rulers of Persia had a certain fear of God, but no living faith. Like his grandfather Darius, Artaxerxes acknowledged the God of heaven... but, in his decree, Artaxerxes goes further: he acknowledges the God of Ezra (v. 14), the God of Israel (v. 15), and the God of Jerusalem (v. 19). He also admits his own responsibility toward this God, whose wrath is something to fear (v. 23).
The command and the warning sit in one sentence. The king wants nothing left out, because he has worked out what neglect could cost him.
It may seem amazing that the King of Persia would decree, "Whatever is decreed by the God of heaven, let it be done in full for the house of the God of heaven" (v. 23). We might expect such words from a godly king of Israel; but God knows how to work in the hearts of others outside Israel too. Artaxerxes realized that the God of heaven was in such control that He might make Persia suffer His wrath if they did not encourage Israel to obey God.
The king does not just allow the work. He orders everything to fall in line with God's will. Commentators differ on whether his own heart was touched.
You cannot miss it: this non-Jewish king refers everything to the will of God. To put it more exactly, he directs that everything be arranged in submission to that will... because he confesses the Lord as the God of heaven (vv. 21, 23), it may be that grace had visited his heart... The lesson lies on the surface: God is sovereign in the choice of His instruments... Our chapter shows it. "Artaxerxes, king of kings," and "Ezra the priest, a scribe of the law of God," are joined together to carry out God's thoughts for His people and for His house in Jerusalem.
Why does the order reach Jerusalem through Persia at all? One writer traces it to the throne God Himself had set up among the nations.
Here again it is still the Gentile king who sends him for this purpose to Jerusalem. All blessing is of God, but nothing... in the matter of authority comes directly from God. He could not ignore the throne that He Himself had set up among the nations on the earth. And Israel was an earthly people.
Ezra, who copies the decree into his book, credits none of it to his own standing at court.
So it was not his own asking (v. 6) that moved the king to act. It was God who put the thing into the king's heart. It was not Ezra's influence that won him favour with the king and his princes. It was God who showed him mercy in front of them. It was not in his own power that he gathered the chief men to go up with him. It was God who strengthened him, with His own hand upon him.
The king set an open door before Ezra. What Ezra brought to it was a heart already made up.
In the book we are considering, king Artaxerxes is the figure of one that sets an open door before Ezra. Yes, but Ezra's heart was set to do the will of God. God works all outward circumstances. He opens the way when our heart within is set on doing what is right in the sight of the Lord. We have no ground ever to complain about circumstances, if only our heart is right with the Lord. The Lord can and will take care of all else.
- The hand that moves kings. God worked in the heart of a foreign ruler. So a Persian king spoke of the God of Ezra, the God of Israel, and the God of Jerusalem.
- The hand that is feared. Artaxerxes wanted the work done in full. He feared that neglect would bring wrath on his realm and his sons.
- The hand that supplies. The king's letter put the empire's authority under a will that was not his own. It joined "king of kings" and scribe together for God's house.
- The hand that guides. Ezra credited the decree, the favour, and his own strength to God, not to his request or influence.
- The hand that opens doors. The open door met a man whose heart was already set to do God's will. Keep the heart right, and God handles the circumstances.
Also we inform you, as regards all the priests and Levites, singers, doorkeepers, Nethinim, and ministers of this house of God, it shall not be lawful to impose tribute, tax, and toll upon them.
Ezra 7:24 closes a Persian king's written order, and it frees every worker at the Jerusalem temple from state tax — priests, Levites, singers, doorkeepers and temple servants alike. Why would a foreign emperor give up income for a religion that was not his own?
The verse reaches past the priests to the lowest ranks of temple staff. One of those names needs explaining:
The Nethinim were temple servants. The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, devoted to God. We find this name in only one other passage (1 Chron. 9:2). According to Ezra 8:20 this order originated with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites, whom Joshua appointed as helpers to the Levites (Josh. 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God assigned to certain duties in the temple.
The three charges named are not repetitions of one tax. Writers distinguish them:
The words halak, τέλος, apparently allude to the duty paid on merchandise or produce, and should be distinguished from 'tribute.' Ezra 4:13, 20; Ezra 7:24; Matt. 17:25; Rom. 13:7.
Taken together, the effect was total. Ezra and his helpers were
exempted from every form of tax or exaction, and also given power to punish all evildoers, whether they broke the law of God or 'the law of the king'.
Years earlier, enemies had written to a Persian court warning that a rebuilt Jerusalem would stop paying its dues. Now a Persian court grants that very thing on purpose:
More than this, the king ordered that it would be unlawful to impose tax, tribute or custom on any of the priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers, Nethinim or servants of the house of God (v. 24). Rehum and Shimshai had urged a previous Artaxerxes to stop the Jews from building by claiming that the Jews would not pay tax, tribute or custom (ch. 4:9-13), but the king now was ready to forgo these things for heads of Israel, so that Judah would prosper.
How far did the king's own belief go? One writer weighs his fear of God against his lack of faith:
The decree of Artaxerxes, like the letter of Darius (Ezra 6), shows us how the rulers of Persia thought. They had a certain fear of God, but no living faith. Like his grandfather Darius, Artaxerxes acknowledged the God of heaven. In his decree he goes further. He acknowledges the God of Ezra (v. 14), the God of Israel (v. 15), and the God of Jerusalem (v. 19). He also admits that he answers to this God, and that God's anger is something to fear (v. 23).
Read the other way, the calculation was political as much as religious — the king
rightly realized that it would be beneficial to his entire empire if God were given His place in Israel.
A tax break from a foreign throne is a favour. It is also proof that Israel no longer ruled itself, but lived under Gentile (non-Jewish) power:
Notice again that the signs of the transfer of governmental power on earth from the Jew to the Gentile are everywhere plain. So the date of Ezra's mission is given as "in the reign of Artaxerxes king of Persia," and his commission from the king is set out at length (vv. 11-26). This proves that God's people were at this time under the authority of the Gentiles, and that God Himself always recognises the powers which have their source in His own sovereign appointment.
The same favour is described elsewhere as mercy shown through the very power that held Israel down:
Royal liberality, not without a certain fear of God, is owned with exemption in such things from tribute in verses 19-24... A soul less devout and submissive to God's will in the humbling of Israel would have chafed.
Ezra credited none of this to his own standing at court:
So it was not his asking (v. 6) that led the king to act. It was God who put the thing into the king's heart. It was not Ezra's influence that commended him to the king and his princes. It was God who showed him mercy in their presence. It was not in his own power that he gathered the chief men to go up with him. It was God who strengthened him with His own hand upon him.
- Hand. The exemption began with God's hand on the king's heart, not with Ezra's standing at court.
- Heart. That hand moved a ruler who feared God without living faith, yet named Him as the God of Ezra, of Israel, and of Jerusalem.
- Grant. The gift was full relief from tribute, custom and toll — three charges, not one tax under three names.
- Reach. It covered the whole staff of God's house, down to the Nethinim. Their name means "given" — servants devoted to God.
- Reversal. Enemies once tried to stop the work by claiming the Jews would not pay. The king made that very thing his policy, so that Judah would prosper.
And thou, Ezra, after the wisdom of thy God, which is in thy hand, set magistrates and judges who may judge all the people that are beyond the river, all such as know the laws of thy God; and teach ye him that knows [them] not.
Ezra goes back to Jerusalem with a letter from a Persian king. It gives him power to set up judges over God's people and to teach God's law to anyone who does not know it. The surprise is the standard the king uses: "the wisdom of your God that is in your hand."
The words come from Artaxerxes, yet he keeps pointing to the will of Israel's God rather than his own:
You cannot help noticing that this non-Jewish king refers everything to the will of God. To put it more exactly, he directs that everything should be ordered in submission to that will. Though he was not an Israelite, he almost seems to be in full agreement with Ezra's aim... The lesson lies on the surface. God is sovereign in the choice of His instruments. He does according to His will among the people of the earth as in the army of heaven. None can stop His hand, or say to Him, What are you doing? Our chapter illustrates this. "Artaxerxes, king of kings," and "Ezra the priest, a scribe of the law of God," stand yoked together to carry out God's thoughts for His people and for His house in Jerusalem.
The king gained something from this too. One writer points out what Ezra's appointment secured for the throne:
He shows great confidence in Ezra, a man of God. He puts the appointing of magistrates and judges for the region beyond the river into Ezra's hand (v. 25). He knows very well that godly Ezra will not choose anyone who rebels against the royal authority. He wants this man to instruct the ignorant, and for him this is the guarantee of peace for his reign (v. 25).
The king credited Ezra too with God-given wisdom. Ezra was to appoint magistrates and judges in the region west of the River, men who knew the laws of God, so as to teach the people (v. 25). So the king recognised that the land of Israel had a special place in the eyes of the God of heaven and earth. He wanted that country to give God's honour its due. He rightly saw that his whole empire would benefit if Israel gave God His place.
Why did God send a scribe with the law rather than a show of power? One writer sees loving-kindness in that choice:
The way God stepped in through Ezra's mission is, I think, a touching proof of His loving-kindness. It was exactly suited to the needs of the people. It was not power. That had been moved elsewhere. It was the knowledge of the will and the ordinances of God — of the mind of God in the word. The king himself recognised this (Ezra 7:25).
Half the commission is remedial: people who do not know the law are to be taught it, not simply judged by it. Ezra could carry that out because nothing in him competed with the word he handled:
In him we find no miraculous gift and no prophetic gift, such as the prophets Haggai and Zechariah had. There is no extraordinary display of divine power. He has nothing that goes beyond the common measure and ordinary resources. But his heart is devoted to the honour of the lovely name of the Lord, and he cares about the prosperity of the people. Above all, his mark is his understanding of the law of Moses, of the written Word. The Word directs him in everything, and his faith rests on the Word. He insists on the principles the Word presents. He puts them into practice, and he lets no one depart from them. In this way he earns the confidence even of the king, and this is also the only source of his authority.
- Hand. Ezra governs and teaches out of "the wisdom of your God that is in your hand." The wisdom is given to him, not his own.
- King. A foreign ruler bends his whole decree to the will of God. God is sovereign in choosing His instruments.
- Word, not power. Ezra brings no miracle and no display of power. What suits the people's need is the mind of God in His word, and the king himself recognises it.
- Reach. Ezra appoints judges who already know God's laws for all the people beyond the River, and he teaches those who do not.
- Authority. The Word directs Ezra, and he practises what he insists on. That wins even the king's confidence, and it is his only authority.
And whosoever will not do the law of thy God and the law of the king, let judgment be executed diligently upon him, whether unto death, or to banishment, or to confiscation of goods, or to imprisonment.
This verse closes the letter that the Persian king Artaxerxes hands to Ezra. It puts the king's power behind God's law, and it names four penalties for anyone who refuses to obey: death, banishment, loss of property, or prison. Why did God's law need a foreign king's backing, and what does that say about the state of His people?
Through the whole letter the king keeps naming the God of Israel. In this last verse that respect turns into law.
History tells us that Artaxerxes let each people keep their idols, yet he had none himself... but in his decree he goes further: he acknowledges the God of Ezra (v. 14), the God of Israel (v. 15), and the God of Jerusalem (v. 19). He also acknowledges that he is responsible to this God, whose anger is to be feared (v. 23)... Lastly, he orders severe measures against those who break the law of God and of the king, because in his mind these two laws are one and the same (v. 26).
Commentators differ on how the king ranked the two laws. Another writer reads it the other way: the king put his own law second, under God's. That reading also brings out how fast the sentences were to fall.
Finally, he ordered that the law of God should be fully enforced. Anyone who would not keep it, and the law of the king (which he ranked below the law of God), would face judgment without delay. The case might call for death, banishment from Israel, loss of property or prison (v. 26). Where guilt was proved beyond question, this is good government. It is not like so many cases today, dragged out for months without reason.
The penalties do not stand alone. The verse before it tells Ezra to appoint judges and to teach those who do not know the law. So the threat of punishment comes tied to a duty to teach.
The king is generous, and not without a certain fear of God... Ezra is given power, "according to the wisdom of your God that is in your hand," to appoint magistrates and judges to judge all the people, "all such as know the laws of your God," and to teach the one who did not know them. All this stands under the grave penalties of death, banishment, confiscation, or imprisonment (verses 25, 26).
Power like this needed a man whose own life matched the law he enforced. Ezra had done that work long before the king's letter arrived.
He prepared his heart to seek the law first of all, and then to do it, for in his own case he did not separate practice from knowledge. He was not like those teachers of the law who, in the days of Jesus, loaded people with "burdens hard to bear," while they themselves did not touch "the burdens with one of [their] fingers" (Luke 11:46). The precepts of the Word he fed on soaked right through his daily life. And it was only after this that he set his heart "to teach in Israel statutes and the ordinance" (v. 10). In a word, his life and his conduct were in complete agreement with his teaching.
A foreign emperor enforcing God's law says less about Persia than about the God who chooses His instruments.
The king provides for the carrying out of Ezra's mission in every possible way, and at the same time he entrusted Ezra with the government of his people "according to the wisdom of God." Finally, he attached penalties to disobedience to the law of God and to the law of the king, rising even to death itself. The lesson lies on the surface: God is sovereign in the choice of His instruments... Our chapter shows it, in that "Artaxerxes, king of kings," and "Ezra the priest, a scribe of the law of God," are yoked together to carry out God's thoughts for His people and for His house in Jerusalem.
Yet a decree like this has a sad side. Israel once had its own king. Now even its freedom to serve its own God came by a foreign ruler's permission.
The people were now under the Gentile's power. They owed the Gentile for permission to live in the land of their fathers, and to keep the laws and do the service of their God. They were subjects of the Persian, and their own ruler was only his deputy.
- Decree — The king puts real force behind God's law: death, banishment, loss of property, prison — and no delay.
- Rank — Writers differ. Did the king make the two laws one, or put his own law second? Either way, he names a God he fears.
- Teaching — The same letter that appoints judges also orders teaching, so those who do not know the law can learn it.
- Character — Ezra sought the law, then did it, then taught it. His life matched his message before any king trusted him.
- Hand — God yokes a foreign emperor to a Jewish scribe to do His will. Yet the borrowed sword shows a people who now live by a foreign king's permission.
Blessed be Jehovah the God of our fathers, who has put [such a thing] as this in the king's heart, to beautify the house of Jehovah which is at Jerusalem;
Ezra had just recorded a Persian king's letter. It gave him money, authority, and permission to return to Jerusalem. Instead of praising the king, he blesses God. Who moves history — the man on the throne, or the God who moves the man on the throne?
One writer traces the decree past King Artaxerxes to God Himself. He finds the same pattern in Cyrus, another Persian king.
It is true, not only of believing kings, but of all kings, that their hearts are in the hand of the Lord. They may think they rule on their own, but the Lord knows how to turn their hearts to do His will. God even moved Cyrus the king of Persia to write a proclamation and send it out through his kingdom... God had spoken to Cyrus in such a way that he became willing to do what Israel's neighbours today would flatly refuse — to build anything for Israel's benefit.
Artaxerxes was not a worshipper of Israel's God. Yet his letter names that God again and again, and one writer weighs carefully what was and was not going on in the king's soul.
The decree of Artaxerxes... shows us the state of mind of the rulers of Persia. They had some fear of God, but no faith that gives life... He let each people keep their idols, as history tells us, yet he himself had none... but in his decree Artaxerxes goes further. He acknowledges the God of Ezra, the God of Israel, and the God of Jerusalem. He also admits that he answers to this God, whose anger is to be feared.
Earlier Ezra had asked the king for this, and the king agreed. Here he refuses to let his own part in it count as the reason.
In this he showed himself to be a true man of faith. He traced everything up to God. He lost sight of himself, and to his soul God was all and in all. So it was not his asking that made the king act; it was God who put the thing into the king's heart. It was not Ezra's influence that won him favour with the king and his princes; it was God who showed him mercy in front of them. It was not his own power that gathered the chief men to go up with him; it was God who strengthened him with His own hand upon him.
The purpose of the whole grant was to make God's house beautiful. Silver and gold were the obvious means — but not, one writer suggests, the best one.
The silver and gold and other gifts out of the treasuries would no doubt add to the natural beauty of the house they were building. But we think the teaching of the law, which Ezra planned to do, would produce a piety in the people, if they received it. That piety adorns any house more than any amount of silver and gold can. The piety that marked Ezra himself is easy to see in these two verses.
Ezra blesses the God of his fathers while Israel is still a humbled people under a foreign empire. That situation could have produced bitterness instead of blessing.
All this drew out Ezra's thanksgiving to the LORD, the God of his fathers, as he expresses it in verses 27 and 28. A soul less devout, and less willing to bow to God's will while Israel was humbled, would have grown resentful.
The phrase "the hand of the LORD my God" runs right through Ezra's account of himself. It covers far more than this one royal favour.
As for Ezra, he attributes everything to God, even the favour of the king... Above all, he lives in the presence of His God. He proves that "the hand of the LORD" is upon him to answer his prayer, protect him, strengthen him, and rescue him.
What Ezra did with a Persian decree, any believer can do with any circumstance.
In all this he is a striking example to every believer. Happy is the one who, like Ezra, has learned to live in the presence of God. He looks beyond what men do to the power that controls them all. He receives everything from the Lord — favour or persecution, help or hindrance. That soul has found the secret of perfect peace in the confusion and turmoil of the world, and in the face of Satan's power.
- Source. The decree looks like a king's generosity. But kings' hearts are in God's hand, and He turns them to do His will even when they think they rule alone.
- Instrument. Artaxerxes had some fear of God but no faith that gives life. God can use a man who acknowledges Him without trusting Him.
- Credit. Ezra traced everything up to God: not his request, not his influence, not his own power. He lost sight of himself.
- Result. Silver and gold beautified the house. But the law taught to the people would produce a piety that adorns it far more.
- Example. Look beyond what men do to the power that controls them. Receive everything — favour or persecution — from the Lord. That is the secret of perfect peace.
and has extended mercy to me before the king and his counsellors, and before all the king's mighty princes. And I was strengthened, as the hand of Jehovah my God was upon me; and I gathered together out of Israel chief men to go up with me.
The Persian king Artaxerxes has just granted Ezra everything he asked for. Ezra answers with worship. He credits the king's favour to God's mercy, and his own courage to God's hand. The verse raises the question every servant of God faces — when doors open and helpers appear, who did it?
One phrase keeps coming back in Ezra's record. A writer traces it through the book and lists what that hand did:
"The hand of the LORD his God was on him." This phrase appears many times (7:6, 9, 28; 8:18, 22, 31), and it shows how this man of God trusted the LORD for guidance. He saw His hand when Artaxerxes granted him everything he asked for. It was the good hand of God who brought him to Jerusalem (7:9). His hand strengthened him (7:28). He acknowledges the good hand of the LORD again in bringing them ministers (8:18) and in deliverance (8:31). The same hand that was for good on Ezra, guiding, keeping and shielding him, is still on all His people who trust Him and obey His Word.
Ezra asked. Ezra had the king's ear. Ezra gathered the company. He credits none of it to himself:
In this he showed himself to be a true man of faith. He traced everything up to God. He lost sight of himself, and to his soul God was all and in all. It was not his own asking (v. 6) that moved the king to act. It was God who put the thing into the king's heart. It was not Ezra's influence that won him favour with the king and his princes. It was God who extended mercy to him in their presence. It was not in his own power that he gathered the chief men to go up with him. It was God who strengthened him with His own hand upon him.
Ezra did not manufacture his opportunity. He had set his heart to seek and obey God's law, and the circumstances followed:
Ezra now has authority to act; but the grand point is the purpose of his heart to do the will of God. We should expect the same now — that our heart should be towards the Lord, as it was with the church in Philadelphia. How does the Lord introduce Himself there? "I have set before you an open door." He has power to open, and none can shut; to shut, and none can open. In this book, king Artaxerxes is a figure of one who sets an open door before Ezra. Yes, but Ezra's heart was set to do the will of God. God works all outward circumstances, and opens the way when our heart within is set to do the right thing in the sight of the Lord. We have no ground ever to complain of circumstances if only our heart is right with the Lord.
What God gave Ezra was not a display of might. One writer says the mission fitted what the people needed:
The way God stepped in through Ezra's mission is, I think, a touching proof of His loving-kindness. It suited the needs of the people exactly. It was not power. Power had passed to another place. It was the knowledge of the will and the ordinances of God — of the mind of God in the word. The king himself recognised this (Ezra 7:25). Guarded by the good hand of his God, this devoted man goes up with many others to Jerusalem.
The group he gathered was small next to the first return:
This time, there are only around 1,500 men plus families who went up, not 43,000 as in chapter 2. But it was God's work and His good hand was on Ezra. This was the secret of his success.
Seeing God behind the acts of powerful people does more than answer a question. It settles the heart:
In all this he is a striking example to every believer. Happy is the one who, like Ezra, has learned to live in the presence of God. Such a person looks beyond the actions of men to the power that controls them all, and receives everything — favour or persecution, help or hindrance — from the Lord. That soul has found the secret of perfect peace amid the confusion and turmoil of the world, as well as in the presence of Satan's power.
- The hand — one phrase runs through Ezra's account. It covers guidance, safe arrival, strength, helpers and rescue.
- The hand grants — the king's decree, and the mercy shown before his counsellors and princes. Ezra credits both to God, not to his own asking or influence.
- The hand strengthens — not with power, which had passed elsewhere, but with the knowledge of God's mind in His word. That is what the people needed.
- The hand gathers — the group that followed him was small next to the first return. God's good hand on him was the secret of his success.
- The hand settles — look past what people do to the power behind them. Then favour and opposition both come from the Lord, and the heart keeps perfect peace.
And these are the chief fathers, and their genealogy, who went up with me from Babylon in the reign of Artaxerxes the king.
Ezra 8 opens by naming the families who left Babylon with Ezra. Verse 1 is the heading of that register, and it raises a question: why does God keep a list of names at all?
The list comes after the king had already given Ezra permission and support. One writer traces the sequence:
After these things, in the seventh year of Artaxerxes Longimanus, Ezra the priest went up from Babylon. With him went other Israelites of every rank, by the king's favour, with freewill offerings, and with authority for everything Ezra wanted for the house of his God... Ezra 8 then gives the family record of Ezra's companions, their fears, yet faith, and safe arrival.
Chapter 7 ended with Ezra gathering leading men to travel with him. This list follows straight on, and one writer draws out what the names themselves say about God:
This genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14, and it shows how precious to God were the very names of those who answered His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet in that same grace He gladly credits to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. It was a fine company of more than fifteen hundred people.
Not everyone in Babylon went. One writer notes what happened to the names of those who stayed:
God has made sure of this. The names of those who stirred themselves to answer His call to return to the land stand on record in a lasting way. The names of those who did not stir themselves are almost entirely lost.
The king had been generous, yet few came. One writer weighs the numbers, and the faith the journey took:
Set against the splendid decree and generosity of Artaxerxes, the company was very small. Most preferred Babylon and stayed there. The faithful ones are known to God, and their names are written here forever in His Word. The Gentile king had given the decree, and the people had plenty of all they needed. Still, the undertaking was one of faith. They came out of Babylon trusting the LORD; they marched on in faith. Notice especially that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages we read of in the next chapter were most likely the result of no women joining Ezra's expedition.
Set beside the earlier return, fewer priests and Levites answered this time:
The earlier return included several priests with their many households (Ezra 2:36-39); now only two volunteered, and no households are mentioned. At first no Levites offered themselves to Ezra, but this drew out his zeal, and not without fruit. Among the people, some families returned now for the first time; from other families, a further group came. From one family, the sons of Adonikam (also called Adonijah), the last of the sons appear to have gone up.
Ezra led this company at a low point in the nation's life. One writer describes what carried him:
It was the day of the people's humiliation. So what marked Ezra was not power, but compassion and devoted obedience. God wants reality in those He honours; He hates false pretence... In Babylon, Ezra did not have the living prophets who had cheered the early workers in Jerusalem. But his heart was set on the written word, and the hand of the LORD did not fail in gracious care, either for God and His worship, or on his journey to Jerusalem.
- Call — Chapter 7 ended with Ezra gathering leading men; verse 1 heads the list of who actually came.
- Response — Their answer came from God's grace. Yet He credits to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts.
- Record — God keeps the names of those who stirred themselves. The names of those who stayed are almost entirely lost.
- Reality — In a day of humiliation, Ezra's mark was not power but devoted obedience. His heart was set on the written word.
- Remnant — The king's decree was generous, yet the company was small. Most preferred Babylon; those who left went out trusting the LORD.
Of the children of Phinehas, Gershom; of the children of Ithamar, Daniel; of the children of David, Hattush;
Ezra 8 opens with the list of those who left Babylon with Ezra, and it begins with just three men: two priests and one son of David. Why does Scripture keep names like these, and what does it say that so few from these honoured families were willing to go?
One writer explains why God keeps a list like this at all:
This genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14. It shows how precious to God were the very names of those who answered His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet in that same grace He is pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. It was a fine company of over fifteen hundred people, gathered to return to the land of their fathers. That was the land of all their traditions, and the land of all their hopes.
The silence of this record says as much as its words:
Some stirred themselves to answer His call to return to the land. God has seen to it that their names are on record in a very permanent way. The names of those who did not stir themselves are almost entirely lost.
Gershom and Daniel were priests. When Ezra looked over the company he had gathered, the count troubled him:
There were two priests, but only two: Gershom, son of Phinehas, and Daniel, son of Ithamar. From the Levitical family, outside the priesthood, there was not a single one. Ezra might well be concerned, for it was a sad sign of the state into which the people had fallen. The priests alone had access to the holy place of the house of their God. The Levites alone were the appointed ministers in everything belonging to its service. Yet when the call came that they might return and take up their privileges again, they stayed unmoved and indifferent.
Another writer asks where these Levites had put down roots:
While a small number of Levites had gone up with Zerubbabel, none had joined Ezra. Only two priests were present, Gershon, son of Phinehas, and Daniel, son of Ithamar. What indifference this reveals! They had settled down in the enemy's land and were satisfied to remain there. They were minding earthly things, and the things of God were forgotten by them. Still they were Levites in their holy calling. It is the same today with many who are no doubt saved, but who are worldly-minded and have little desire to live in the separation He requires from His people.
One name in this verse is not priestly at all. Hattush is identified elsewhere as "son of Shemaiah, a descendant of David" (Morrish Bible Dictionary). Why did God keep Judah and David's family alive through the exile at all? One writer answers:
Why is Judah in captivity preserved as a people? Why not scattered and lost among the nations, as the ten tribes are? Because God had a purpose of grace to carry out, and full judgment was delayed. God had set David upon the throne, and it was a pledge that Christ must sit there also. For Christ on the throne of David is God's centre of blessing for this earth. So the tribe the King was to come from is kept safe until the appointed time, when Jesus is born in Bethlehem. During the captivity, when the Gentile held the throne, the line of true heirs was kept as something sacred. After the return from Babylon, Matthew carries that line on to the birth of Christ, and in Him it ends.
The same thought cuts off any idea that the returning remnant earned their place:
There was no merit whatsoever in them. God delivered the remnant from captivity because His word must be fulfilled, above all His promise about the Lord Jesus Christ. That the promised Branch might shoot forth, the house of David must be restored.
Every name in this register belonged to someone who gave up the familiar:
The men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been so much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia, where they had grown up. But they return to the place of God's choice, and God is with them.
- Grace first. The willingness to go was God's own work in them, and He then credits it to them as theirs.
- Grace named. God recorded those who answered; the names of those who stayed are lost.
- Grace's gap. Only two priests came, and not one Levite. The rest traded privilege for comfort in Babylon.
- Grace's purpose. A son of David among the returning few shows why Judah survived at all: God had pledged David's throne to Christ.
- Grace's cost. Every name on the list chose the harder road to God's chosen place — and God went with them.
of the children of Shecaniah, of the children of Parosh, Zechariah, and with him were registered by genealogy of the males a hundred and fifty.
Ezra 8:3 is one line in a register: Zechariah, of the family of Shecaniah and Parosh, with 150 men listed beside him. Why does Scripture keep such a list, and what does it say about those who left Babylon — and about the many more who stayed?
One writer reads the whole register as evidence of how God values a response He Himself produced:
This genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14, and it shows how precious to God were the very names of those who responded to His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet by that same grace He is pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. This company was gathered to return to the land of their fathers — the land of all their traditions, as well as the land of all their hopes.
Names like Zechariah's survive. The names of those who stayed behind do not:
The first fourteen verses give the names of those who went with Ezra, set out by their genealogies, with the number of the males in each family. God has seen to it that the names of those who stirred themselves to answer His call to return to the land went on record in a very lasting way. The names of those who did not stir themselves are almost entirely lost.
One hundred and fifty men from one family is not a crowd, and the numbers across the whole list tell the same story:
In view of the splendid decree and generosity of Artaxerxes, the company was very small. The majority preferred Babylon, and remained there. The faithful ones are known to God, and their names are written here forever in His Word. The foreign king had given the decree, and the people had everything they needed. Even so, the undertaking was one of faith. They came out of Babylon trusting the LORD; they marched on in faith.
The register mixes two kinds of families:
Of the people, some fresh families now returned; of other families a fresh part.
Some Bibles spell the name Pharosh:
Pharosh. Ancestor of some who returned from exile. Ezra 8:3. The Hebrew is the same as Parosh.
Verse 3 counts 150 males, and every entry in the list does the same. Commentators differ on what this means. One takes the count as a matter of public record, not a list of everyone who travelled:
Those who voluntarily came to accompany Ezra to Jerusalem are recorded here, the men numbering almost 1500. Women must also have been present, but are not mentioned. This does not mean God thinks less of the faith of women. He often commends them for their devotion. But the emphasis here is on the public record, and women do not hold a public place, so there was no reason to name them. Children are not mentioned either. The emphasis in verse 1 falls on "the heads of their fathers' houses," showing God's vital interest in households.
A second writer draws a different conclusion from the same silence:
Notice that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages we read of in the next chapter most likely came about because no women had joined Ezra's expedition.
- Grace first. Their willingness to leave Babylon was God's own work in them. Yet He credits the response to them and writes their names down for it.
- A named few. The permission was open to all. The register names the few who acted on it; the many who preferred Babylon stayed unnamed.
- Faith, not resources. They had the king's decree and full supplies. The journey out of Babylon was still an act of trust.
- Named by household. The list counts heads of families: some houses appear for the first time, others send a further group, like the 150 men with Zechariah.
- Names that last. The names of those who stirred themselves are on permanent record. The names of those who did not are almost entirely lost.
Of the children of Pahath-Moab, Elihoenai the son of Zerahiah, and with him two hundred males.
Ezra 8:4 is a single line in a register: a family name, a leader, his father, and a head count of the men who travelled with him. It looks like an office record, so why did God keep it in Scripture?
The list in verses 1–14 is not filler. Names drop out of history all the time. These did not.
The first fourteen verses give the names of those who went with Ezra. They are listed by family line, with the number of the men in each family. God has seen to it that the names of those who stirred themselves to answer His call to return to the land stand on record in a very lasting way. The names of those who did not stir themselves are almost entirely lost.
Eliehoenai answered a call. Even the willingness to answer came from somewhere else.
This genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14. It shows how precious to God were the very names of those who responded to His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet in that same grace He is pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. It was a fine company of over fifteen hundred people, gathered to return to the land of their fathers. That was the land of all their traditions, and the land of all their hopes.
Two hundred men is a large household. The number looks different next to what the king had offered.
The names of those who gathered around Ezra and went up with him are recorded here. In view of the magnificent decree and generosity of Artaxerxes, the company was very small. The majority preferred Babylon and stayed there. The faithful ones are known to God, and their names are written here forever in His Word. The foreign king had given the decree. The people had a full supply of everything they needed. Even so, the undertaking was one of faith. They came out of Babylon trusting the LORD; they marched on in faith.
These families had not all stayed away together. Some of them had already sent people home in the earlier return.
The earlier return included several priests with their many houses (Ezra 2:36-39); now only two volunteered, with no mention of their houses. Of the people, some fresh families now returned; of other families a fresh part.
The comfortable option was always available. Those listed here refused it:
The men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia, where they had grown up. Instead they return to the place of God's choice (Deut 12), and God is with them.
The verse counts men only. That is about the public record, not about God's view of women.
This list records those who came of their own will to go with Ezra to Jerusalem. The men numbered almost 1500. Women must also have been present, but are not mentioned. This does not mean God thinks less of the faith of women. He often commends them for their devotion. But the emphasis here is on a public record, and women do not hold a public place, so there was no reason to mention them. Children too are not mentioned. In fact, the emphasis in verse 1 is on "the heads of their fathers' houses," showing God's vital interest in households.
Commentators differ on whether any women made the journey at all. One writer links their absence to trouble that came later:
Notice especially that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages we read of in the next chapter were most likely the result of the fact that no women had joined Ezra's expedition.
Israel was small, scattered and under a foreign king. That is exactly why these records mattered.
Notice this principle. It was a day of weakness and humiliation. Even so, it was not to be a day of neglect, but of the greatest care. God's people were to be as watchful for His name as in the days when everything stood in the full power and beauty of divine order.
- Called. God called His people back to the land. Most preferred Babylon and stayed, and their names are almost entirely lost.
- Answered. Two hundred men of one household came. God Himself had produced that willingness in their hearts.
- Recorded. God put their names in His Word forever, and credited to them what His own grace had worked.
- Household. The list runs by heads of fathers' houses, because God cares about whole families, not just single people.
- Careful. A weak day was no excuse for neglect. It called for the greatest care over who belonged.
Of the children of Shechaniah, the son of Jahaziel, and with him three hundred males.
Ezra 8:5 sits inside a roll call — fourteen verses of family heads who left Babylon with Ezra, each with the number of men under him. Why would God keep a list like this, and what did it cost the three hundred who went with Shecaniah?
The list follows straight on from the end of the previous chapter. One writer sees the names themselves as the point.
This family record runs to the end of verse 14, and it shows how precious those names were to God — the names of those who answered His call at such a moment. Their response was itself the fruit of His grace. Yet by that same grace He is glad to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. It was a fine company, more than fifteen hundred people, gathered to return to the land of their fathers — the land of all their traditions, and the land of all their hopes.
Every list has a shadow — the people left out of it. Those who stayed in Babylon were the majority.
The first fourteen verses give the names of those who went with Ezra, family by family, and the number of the males in each family. God has made sure that the names of those who stirred themselves to answer His call to return to the land are put on record in a very lasting way, while the names of those who did not stir themselves are almost completely lost.
Verse 5 counts three hundred men under Shecaniah. Where are the wives and children in these totals?
Those who came of their own free will to go with Ezra to Jerusalem are recorded here, and the men numbered almost 1500. Women must have been there too, but they are not mentioned. This does not mean God thinks less of the faith of women, for He often commends them for their devotion. But the emphasis here is on the public record, and women do not hold a public place, so there was no reason to mention them. Children are not mentioned either. In fact, the emphasis in verse 1 is on "the heads of their fathers' houses," showing God's vital interest in households.
Commentators differ here. Another writer holds that no women travelled at all, and ties that to the trouble in the next chapter.
It must be especially noticed that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages we read about in the next chapter were most likely the result of the fact that no women had joined Ezra's expedition.
The earlier return grouped many people by their towns. This one names a family ancestor for each group: here the sons of Zattu, with Shecaniah son of Jahaziel at their head.
In this new exodus, part of the people who had stayed in the province of Babylon went with Ezra. Like their leader, they have an exact family record. Scripture lists all of them by their families, and not by their cities as it did for some of those in Ezra 2. In the first great movement of restoration, there had been little doubt about the right of people to belong to the people of God... but here it seems necessary to be even stricter than at the start... It is not a sign, nor greater power, nor greater love, but this watchfulness that becomes a necessity if one wants to keep the testimony of God pure.
Babylon was where these men had grown up. They left it anyway.
The men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been so much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia where they had grown up but they return to the place of God's choice (Deut 12) and God is with them.
Set against the king's generous decree, the turnout was small.
Given the splendid decree and generosity of Artaxerxes, the company was very small. Most of the people preferred Babylon and stayed there. God knows the faithful ones, and their names stand here forever in His Word. Though a foreign king had given the decree, and the people had plenty of all they needed, the venture was one of faith. They came out of Babylon trusting the LORD, and they marched on in faith.
- Called. God called His people back to the land. Their response grew out of His grace, yet He credits it to them.
- Counted. The list counts every family head and the men under him — three hundred here — because God's interest runs through households, not crowds.
- Costly. Staying was easier; these men left the land they had grown up in for the place God had chosen.
- Checked. Unlike the first return, this list traces each group to a family ancestor — a later day called for more care about who belonged, not less.
- Kept. Scripture keeps forever the names of those who went; the names of those who stayed behind are almost completely lost.
And of the children of Adin, Ebed the son of Jonathan, and with him fifty males.
Ezra 8 opens with a register of the families who travelled back from Babylon with Ezra. This verse records one of them: the house of Adin, with fifty men. Why does Scripture keep such small numbers and little-known names? What does a group of fifty say about God's people at that moment?
The opening section of the chapter is a roll-call: family by family, a leader, then a count. One writer notes what God secured by putting it in writing.
The first fourteen verses give the names of those who went with Ezra, family line by family line, and the number of men in each family. God has made sure that the names of those who stirred themselves to answer His call to return to the land are put on record in a lasting way. The names of those who did not stir themselves are almost completely lost.
Ebed and his fifty made the choice to go. Another writer traces that willingness back to its source.
This family record runs to the end of verse 14. It shows how precious to God were the very names of those who answered His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet in that same grace He is pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts.
Adin's house had already sent a company home in the earlier return under Zerubbabel. Now only fifty more follow. That pattern runs through the whole list.
The earlier return included several priests with their many families (Ezra 2:36-39). Now only two volunteered, and no families are mentioned with them. At first no Levites offered themselves to Ezra, but this drew out his zeal, and it bore fruit. Among the people, some families returned for the first time; of other families, a further part came. From one family, the sons of Adonikam (or Adonijah), "the last sons" seem to have gone up. Of that family the ominous number 666 had returned with Zerubbabel (Ezra 2:13).
So fifty from Adin means the rest of the house stayed where it was. One short verse records both faith and indifference.
Ezra travelled with the king's written permission and generous supplies. Even so, one writer notes how few came, and who is missing from the count.
Given the splendid decree and the generosity of Artaxerxes, the company was very small. Most of the people preferred Babylon and stayed there. God knows the faithful ones, and their names are written here forever in His Word. The Gentile king had given the decree, and the people had all the supplies they needed. Even so, the venture was one of faith. They came out of Babylon trusting the LORD, and they marched on in faith. Notice that only men are mentioned. The mixed marriages we read about in the next chapter were most likely the result of no women joining Ezra's journey.
These men had grown up in Mesopotamia, the region around Babylon. Going up to Jerusalem meant leaving the only home they knew.
The men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been so much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia where they had grown up but they return to the place of God's choice (Deut 12) and God is with them.
The fifty men of this verse went up under Ezra. One writer describes what marked him, and where his confidence lay.
It was a day when the people had been brought low. So what marked Ezra was not power, but compassion and devoted obedience. God wants what is real in those He honours; He hates false pretence... In Babylon, Ezra did not have living prophets to cheer him on, as the earlier workers in Jerusalem had. But his heart was set on the written word. And the hand of the LORD did not fail him in kind providence, either for God and His worship, or on his journey to Jerusalem.
- Called — God called His people back to the land, and the list records who answered and who did not.
- Grace — God produced the willingness of Ebed and his fifty, then credited it to them as their own.
- Costly — staying in Mesopotamia would have been easier; these men chose the place God had chosen.
- Partial — the fifty are a further part of a house that had already sent some; the rest of it stayed behind.
- Recorded — God names the small and the faithful forever in His Word; those who never stirred left almost no trace.
And of the children of Elam, Isaiah the son of Athaliah, and with him seventy males.
Ezra's list of returning exiles moves family by family. At verse 7 it names Jeshaiah, son of Athaliah, who came up with seventy men of the house of Elam. Why does Scripture keep the name of a man we never hear of again? And what did those seventy choose when they left Babylon?
Verse 7 sits inside a list of names and numbers. One writer explains why God kept it:
This genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14, and it shows how precious to God were the very names of those who responded to His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet in the working of that same grace He is pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. It was a fine company of over fifteen hundred souls. They gathered in this way to return to the land of their fathers — the land of all their traditions, as well as the land of all their hopes.
Seventy men is not many. Notice too that the verse counts males only. One writer weighs both facts:
The names of those who gathered around Ezra and went up with him are recorded here. Considering the generous decree of Artaxerxes and his open-handed giving, the company was very small. The majority preferred Babylon, and stayed there. The faithful ones are known to God, and their names are written here forever in His Word. The Gentile king had given the decree, and the people had a rich supply of everything they needed. Even so, the undertaking was one of faith. They came out of Babylon trusting the LORD; they marched on in faith. We should especially notice that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages we read of in the next chapter were most likely the result of the fact that no women had joined Ezra's expedition.
Jeshaiah's name survives; the names of the men of Elam who stayed behind do not. That contrast is deliberate:
Some stirred themselves to answer His call to return to the land. God has seen to it that their names stand on record in a very permanent way. The names of those who did not stir themselves are almost entirely lost.
The seventy of verse 7 are not the whole house of Elam. One writer shows how this list works:
Of the people, some fresh families now returned; of other families a fresh part.
Every entry in the list ties a man to his father and his father's house — Jeshaiah to Athaliah, Athaliah's line to Elam. That pattern is not filler:
In this new exodus, part of the people who had stayed in the province of Babylon go up with Ezra. These people, like their leader, have an exact genealogical record. Scripture mentions all of them according to their families and not, like part of those in Ezra 2, according to their cities. In the first great movement of restoration, there had been fairly little doubt about each person's right to belong to the people of God. What doubt there was concerned mainly the priesthood. Here it seems necessary to be even stricter than at the beginning.
Those mixed marriages did come to light. The man who spoke up first came from this same house of Elam:
We cannot stress enough how much the blessing of the people of God may depend on one or a few faithful people... Here, the humbling of one man, whom a few others then join, leads to a general humbling. And once again a single man steps forward to express it. Shecaniah the son of Jehiel, of the sons of Elam, told Ezra that they had acted unfaithfully toward their God and had taken foreign wives from the peoples of the land.
- Call. The going up answered God's call. God credits that very response to His people as the fruit of His own grace in their hearts.
- Cost. Most of the nation preferred Babylon. Seventy men of Elam went anyway, on nothing but trust in the LORD.
- Record. Those who stirred themselves have their names on record for good. The names of those who did not are almost entirely lost.
- Proof. The list places each man by family, not by city. Each had to show his descent, more closely than in the first return.
- Result. Only men went up, and mixed marriages followed. Yet from this same house of Elam came the man who led the whole people into confession — blessing can hang on a very few faithful people.
And of the children of Shephatiah, Zebadiah the son of Michael, and with him eighty males.
Ezra 8:8 sits inside a roll call of the families who left Babylon with Ezra. Zebadiah is one name of fourteen, and the writers ask why God kept this list, why so few came, and what the journey cost.
The register runs to the end of verse 14. One writer reads the whole list as proof of how God values those who answer Him.
This genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14. It shows how precious to God were the very names of those who answered His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet by that same grace He is pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts.
The same writer, commenting on the earlier register in chapter 2, draws out what such a record is for:
He looks with joy on the smallest fruits of His Spirit's work. The very names of His people are known and announced. This encourages everyone to walk in His ways, to stand with His interests, and to stay faithful in times of corruption and falling away.
Some houses in Ezra's list are new. Others, like this one, sent a fresh group from a family that had already gone up before.
At first no Levites offered themselves to Ezra; but this drew out his zeal, and not without fruit. Of the people, some fresh families now returned; of other families, a fresh part.
The verse names Zebadiah, his father Michael, and his family head Shephatiah — three generations in half a line. The earlier return grouped many people by their home towns instead.
In this new exodus, part of the people who had stayed in the province of Babylon go with Ezra. Like their leader, these people have an exact genealogical record. Scripture lists every one of them by family, not by city as it did for part of the group in Ezra 2. In the first great movement of restoration, there had been little doubt about the right of individuals to belong to the people of God. Here it seems necessary to be even stricter than at the beginning.
Leaving was the harder choice. One writer names the easier option these men turned down.
The men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia, where they had grown up. But they return to the place of God's choice (Deut 12) and God is with them.
The totals in this list are small. One writer sets them beside the king's generous decree.
Artaxerxes gave a magnificent decree and was very generous, yet the company was very small. The majority preferred Babylon and stayed there. God knows the faithful ones, and their names are written here forever in His Word. The Gentile king had given the decree, and the people had all the supplies they needed. Even so, the undertaking was one of faith.
Each entry in this register, verse 8 included, counts males. Commentators differ on what that silence means. Gaebelein takes it at face value and links it to the crisis that breaks out in the next chapter: "It must be especially noticed that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages of which we read in the next chapter most likely were the result of the fact that no women had joined Ezra's expedition." Another writer reads the omission as a matter of public record rather than absence:
Women must also have been there, though the list does not mention them. This is not because God thinks less of the faith of women. He often commends them for their devotion. But the emphasis here is on publication, and women do not hold a public place, so there was no reason to refer to them.
- Called — the return started with God's call. The answer in these men's hearts was His own work before it was their choice.
- Counted — God kept a record of who answered: family, father, and number. Zebadiah's eighty are not a footnote but a record He chose to keep.
- Costly — these men grew up in Mesopotamia. Every one of them walked away from the easier option, and the small totals show most of their countrymen did not.
- Continued — some families had already gone up years before. Verse 8 is a fresh part of one of them answering later, so a slow start is not a closed door.
- Credited — God sees the smallest fruit of His own work with joy. He publishes it to encourage anyone staying faithful when everything around has gone wrong.
Of the children of Joab, Obadiah the son of Jehiel, and with him two hundred and eighteen males.
One short line in a long register: a family name, one leader, and a count of 218 men. It belongs to the roll of those who left Babylon with Ezra. Why would God keep such a list at all?
No one forced these men to go. The names in verses 1–14 belong to people who chose to leave a settled life and travel back to Jerusalem. The count lists only the men.
This list records those who came of their own free will to travel with Ezra to Jerusalem. The men numbered almost 1500. Women also must have been present, but are not mentioned. This does not mean God thinks less of the faith of women. He often praises them for their devotion. But the point here is a public record, and women did not hold a public place, so there was no reason to name them. Children too are not mentioned. In fact, verse 1 puts the emphasis on "the heads of their fathers' houses." This shows God's deep interest in households.
Obadiah's name survives because God wanted it to survive. And the willingness that put him on the list was itself something God had worked in him first.
This genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14, and it shows how precious to God were the very names of those who responded to His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet by that same grace He is pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. It was a fine company of over fifteen hundred people, gathered to return to the land of their fathers — the land of all their traditions and the land of all their hopes.
Ezra's list catches families at different stages of coming out. Some names here are new. Others belong to families that had already sent part of their number home.
At first no Levites offered themselves to Ezra; but this drew out his zeal, and not without fruit. Of the people, some fresh families now returned; of other families a fresh part.
This list is arranged differently from the one in Ezra 2. Here each man is placed by family, and each could show his exact line.
In this new exodus, Ezra is accompanied by part of the people who had remained in the province of Babylon. These people, like their leader, have an exact record of their family line. Scripture mentions all of them according to their families and not, as with part of those in Ezra 2, according to their cities. In the first great movement of restoration there had been fairly little doubt about the right of people to belong to the people of God, and that doubt was mostly about the priesthood. But here it seems necessary to be even stricter than at the beginning.
Leaving cost these families something. They had grown up in Babylon, and staying would have been the easy choice.
The men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been so much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia where they had grown up, but they return to the place of God's choice (Deut. 12) and God is with them.
This list comes from a day of humiliation for the nation. Ezra led it without power of his own.
As it was the day of the people's humiliation, not power but pity and devotedness in obedience marked Ezra. God will have reality in those He honours; false pretensions He hates... Ezra in Babylon did not have the living prophets who had cheered the early workers in Jerusalem. But his heart was set on the written word. And the hand of the LORD did not fail in gracious providence, either for God and His worship, or on his journey to Jerusalem.
- Called. They went up in answer to God's call at a low moment. That answer was itself the fruit of His grace in their hearts.
- Costly. Settling in the country where they had grown up would have been far easier; they left it for the place of God's choice.
- Counted. These were volunteers, listed as heads of fathers' houses — nearly 1,500 men. Wives and children go unnamed, yet the record shows God's interest in whole households.
- Credited. God recorded the very names of those who answered, crediting to them what He Himself had produced in them.
- Continued. Some families here were returning for the first time; others sent a fresh group after an earlier one. Families come out in stages, and the later stage is checked more strictly.
And of the children of Shelomith, the son of Josiphiah, and with him a hundred and sixty males.
This verse is one line in a roll call. Shelomith, son of Josiphiah, brings 160 men out of Babylon to Jerusalem with Ezra. Why does God write such people down by name? And what did it cost them to be on the list?
Verse 10 sits inside a list that runs from verse 1 to verse 14. Ezra records it as the genealogy of those who travelled with him. One writer explains why such a list exists at all, and finds grace at both ends of it:
This genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14, and it shows how precious to God were the very names of those who responded to His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. But by that same grace He is glad to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. It was a fine company of over fifteen hundred people, gathered to return to the land of their fathers. It was the land of all their traditions, and the land of all their hopes.
Shelomith's 160 men are part of that fifteen hundred, and their names were precious to God.
Shelomith and his men were free to stay. Going meant leaving the country where they had grown up:
The men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been so much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia, where they had grown up. But they return to the place of God's choice (Deut. 12), and God is with them.
Ezra had a generous decree from Artaxerxes and ample supplies. That did not remove the risk, and it did not swell the numbers:
The names of those who gathered around Ezra and went up with him are here recorded. Artaxerxes had given a magnificent decree and been very generous, yet the company was very small. The majority preferred Babylon, and remained there. The faithful ones are known to God, and their names are here written in His Word for ever. The foreign king had given the decree, and the people had everything they needed. Even so, the venture was one of faith. They came out of Babylon trusting the LORD; they marched on in faith.
The list shows an uneven pattern. Some families appear in it for the first time. Others had already sent part of their number in an earlier return, and now send more:
Of the people some fresh families now returned; of other families a fresh part.
The door out of Babylon stayed open. A household could still walk through it later.
Each entry, including this one, counts males. Commentators differ on what that silence means. One reads the emphasis as falling on public representation and on households:
Women also must have been present, but are not mentioned. This is not because God thinks less of the faith of women. He often praises them for their devotion. But the emphasis here is on the public record, and the women do not hold a public place, so there was no reason to mention them. Children too are not mentioned. In fact, the emphasis in verse 1 is on "the heads of their fathers' houses," showing God's vital interest in households.
Another writer links the all-male list to the trouble that breaks out in the next chapter:
Notice especially that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages we read about in the next chapter were most likely the result of no women joining Ezra's expedition.
The character of this return was not strength in numbers but obedience in a low moment:
As it was the day of the people's humiliation, not power but pity and devotedness in obedience marked Ezra. God will have reality in those He honours; false pretensions He hates.
- Called. The list exists because the names of those who answered God's call at that moment were precious to Him.
- Costly. Answering meant leaving the country where they had grown up for the place of God's choice. Staying would have been far easier.
- Counted. Shelomith's 160 men are one entry in a company of about fifteen hundred. The number was small next to the king's generous decree, because the majority preferred Babylon.
- Credited. The response was itself the fruit of God's grace. Yet He credits to His people what He Himself produced in their hearts.
- Continuing. Some families appear here for the first time; others send a further part. The way out of Babylon stayed open to any household willing to take it.
And of the children of Bebai, Zechariah the son of Bebai, and with him twenty-eight males.
Ezra 8:11 names one family head, Zechariah, who went up with twenty-eight men from the house of Bebai. The verse looks like dry record-keeping, yet commentators read these lists as God's own account of who answered His call while most of His people stayed where they were comfortable.
The names in this chapter belong to the men who went up with Ezra. One writer explains why God bothered to keep the list:
This genealogy runs to the end of verse 14. It shows how precious to God were the very names of those who answered His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet by that same grace He is glad to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts.
Notice how the verse counts: not by town, but by family, with the head's father named. One commentator compares this care with the first return:
In this new exodus, part of the people who had stayed in the province of Babylon go up with Ezra. Like their leader, they have an exact genealogical record. Scripture mentions all of them according to their families and not, like part of those in Ezra 2, according to their cities. In the first great movement of restoration, there had been little doubt about the right of people to belong to the people of God. What doubt there was concerned the priesthood. But here it seems necessary to be even stricter than at the beginning.
The name Bebai turns up in more than one of these records. A dictionary entry tracks it:
Two or three whose descendants returned from exile. Ezra 2:11; Ezra 8:11; Ezra 10:28; Neh. 7:16. And one who sealed the covenant. Neh. 10:15.
Some of this family had already gone up in the earlier return of Ezra 2, and here another part follows:
Of the people some fresh families now returned; of other families a fresh part.
The number is small, and the verse counts men only. One writer ties that second detail to the mixed marriages that follow — and the sons of Bebai are named in that record too (Ezra 10:28):
In view of the magnificent decree and generosity of Artaxerxes, the company was very small. The majority preferred Babylon, and stayed there. God knows the faithful ones, and their names are written here forever in His Word… Note carefully that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages we read about in the next chapter were most likely the result of no women joining Ezra's expedition.
Most of the people stayed behind in Babylon. The record cuts both ways:
God has made sure the names of those who stirred themselves to answer His call to return to the land are recorded in a lasting way. The names of those who did not stir themselves are almost all lost.
Going meant leaving the country where they had grown up:
The men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been so much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia, where they had grown up. But they return to the place of God's choice (Deut 12), and God is with them.
- Called — every name here belongs to a man who answered God's call and went up with Ezra.
- Counted — God counts them by family, not by town. This list is stricter than the first return.
- Costly — staying where they grew up would have been far easier. These families chose the place of God's choice.
- Named — the names of those who stirred themselves stand on lasting record. The names of those who did not are almost all lost.
- Credited — God's grace produced their willingness, and the same grace credits it to them as their own.
And of the children of Azgad, Johanan the son of Hakkatan, and with him a hundred and ten males.
Ezra 8:12 is one line in a register of families who left Babylon with Ezra: a father's house, a named leader, and a count of 110 men. The question the verse raises is why God keeps a record like this at all, and what it costs to have your name in it.
The list is not filler. One writer notes both what the register preserves and what its silence says about everyone else.
The first fourteen verses give the names of those who went with Ezra, listed by their genealogies. They also give the number of men in each family. God has made sure that the names of those who stirred themselves to answer His call to return to the land are set down in a very lasting way. The names of those who did not stir themselves are almost entirely lost.
Johanan son of Hakkatan went. That is why we have his name at all.
Why does God record a man's willingness as though the man earned the credit? One writer answers in two steps.
This genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14. It shows how much God valued the very names of those who responded to His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet by that same grace He is pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts.
The numbers in this chapter are small. One writer weighs the size of Ezra's company against the king's generosity.
Here are the names of those who gathered around Ezra and went up with him. Artaxerxes gave an impressive decree and was generous, yet the company was very small. The majority preferred Babylon, and remained there. The faithful ones are known to God, and their names are written here forever in His Word. The Gentile king had given the decree, and the people had a full supply of everything they needed. Even so, the undertaking was one of faith. They came out of Babylon trusting the LORD; they marched on in faith.
Official backing and full funding did not remove the risk. The 110 men from Azgad set out on a promise they could not see.
Every total in this register counts men. One writer ties that detail to what happens in the next chapter.
Notice especially that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages we read about in the next chapter were most likely the result of the fact that no women had joined Ezra's expedition.
The list mixes whole families with parts of families. One study traces that pattern, and notes how few priests and Levites came.
The earlier return included several priests with their many family houses (Ezra 2:36-39). This time only two came forward, with no mention of their houses. At first no Levites offered themselves to Ezra; but this drew out his zeal, and not without fruit. Of the people some fresh families now returned; of other families a fresh part.
Verse 12 looks like one of those partial families. Some of Azgad's descendants came; the rest stayed in Babylon.
These men were not escaping hardship. They were leaving the country they grew up in.
The men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been so much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia where they had grown up, but they return to the place of God's choice (Deuteronomy 12) and God is with them.
This careful list came from a low point in Israel's history, not a high one. One writer draws out the principle behind such care.
Although it was a day of weakness and humiliation it was not to be a day of negligence but of the greatest care. They were to be as watchful and vigilant for His name as in the days when everything stood in the full power and beauty of divine order.
- Call — A call went out, and most of the exiles ignored it. Those who stirred themselves got their names written down. The rest are "almost entirely lost."
- Cost — Staying in Mesopotamia "would have been so much easier." Going meant leaving the place they grew up in for the place God chose.
- Count — 110 men from one house. The company was "very small," funded and authorised, yet "the undertaking was one of faith."
- Credit — God produced the willingness in them. Then, by the same grace, He is "pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts."
- Care — A weak day was no excuse for negligence. God's people were to be "as watchful and vigilant for His name" as in the best of times.
And of the children of Adonikam, the last ones, whose names are these Eliphelet, Jeiel, and Shemaiah, and with them sixty males.
Ezra 8:13 sits inside a list of the families who travelled with Ezra from Babylon back to Jerusalem: three brothers of Adonikam's house, with sixty men. Why does God's record keep the names of these latecomers — "the last" of their house, as older translations put it?
Part of Adonikam's house had already gone home under Zerubbabel — a far larger group than this one.
Of the people, some fresh families now returned; of other families, a fresh part. Of one family, the sons of Adonikam or Adonijah, "the last sons" appear to have gone up. Of that same family the ominous number, 666, had returned with Zerubbabel (Ezra 2:13). Compare Neh. 7:18, Neh. 10:16.
These were the last of that house, so the family left no one behind in Babylon. One writer turns that into a prayer.
In the middle of this procession, the sons of Adonikam shine, most of whom had returned with Zerubbabel (Ezra 2:13). Now the last children (v. 13) go up with Ezra, and their names are not forgotten. So the entire family is complete, and the book of God records this special blessing. May we also see entire families, like the family of Adonikam, among those whom the Lord calls to testify of Him in these final days!
The list is not a human honours board. One writer traces the willingness behind every name back to God.
This genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14, and it shows how precious to God were the very names of those who responded to His call at such a moment. The response itself is the fruit of His grace. Yet in that same grace He is pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. It was a fine company of over fifteen hundred souls, gathered to return to the land of their fathers. It was the land of all their traditions, and the land of all their hopes.
Eliphelet, Jeuel and Shemaiah were not refugees with nowhere else to go. Staying put was the comfortable option.
The men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been so much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia, where they had grown up. But they return to the place of God's choice (Deut. 12), and God is with them.
The verse counts sixty men, and no one else. One writer explains who else travelled, and why they go unnamed.
The record here lists those who came of their own will to accompany Ezra to Jerusalem. The men numbered almost 1500. Women also must have been present, but are not mentioned. This does not mean God thinks less of the faith of women. He often commends them for their devotion. But the emphasis here is on the public record, and the women do not hold a public place, so there was no reason to refer to them. Children too are not mentioned. In fact, the emphasis in verse 1 is on "the heads of their father's houses," showing God's vital interest in households.
Ezra's list names each family, not each town. One writer explains why care had to grow after the first wave.
These people, like their leader, have an exact genealogical record. Scripture mentions all of them according to their families and not, as with part of those in Ezra 2, according to their cities. In the first great movement of restoration, there had been relatively little doubt about who had the right to belong to the people of God, and that doubt was mainly about the priesthood. But here it seems necessary to be even stricter than at the beginning. This happens often. The enthusiasm of first love may allow some mixture, because love and joy overflow and carry the whole people. Foreign elements may come in, and soon after the beginning the painful experience of this becomes clear. But the power of the Holy Spirit is there to discern these foreign elements and separate them when the occasion comes.
- Called — the going up was a response to God's call, and the response itself was the fruit of His grace.
- Costly — staying in the land where they grew up would have been far easier. They chose the place of God's choice instead.
- Counted — Ezra's list records each family, and checks descent more strictly than the first return did.
- Complete — Adonikam's house left no one behind in Babylon. The verse records that blessing on a whole family.
- Kept — the names of Eliphelet, Jeuel and Shemaiah are not forgotten. God treasures the names of those who answer Him, and His care reaches whole households.
And of the children of Bigvai, Uthai and Zabbud, and with them seventy males.
This verse closes the list of families who travelled with Ezra from Babylon to Jerusalem. The last line is one family name, two men and a headcount. Why does God record such details at all? (Some older translations read "Zabbud" where the ESV has "Zaccur".)
The names run from verse 1 to the end of verse 14. One writer draws out what that record shows about God:
This genealogy reaches to the end of verse 14, and it shows how precious to God were the very names of those who responded to His call at such a moment. Their response was itself the fruit of His grace. Yet in that same grace He is pleased to credit to His people what He Himself had produced in their hearts. It was a fine company of over fifteen hundred people, gathered to return to the land of their fathers. It was the land of all their traditions, and the land of all their hopes.
One writer sets that lasting record against the silence over everyone else:
God has seen to it that the names of those who stirred themselves to answer His call to return to the land are put on record in a very lasting way. The names of those who did not stir themselves are almost entirely lost.
The king had given generous backing. The turnout tells another story:
The names of those who gathered around Ezra and went up with him are recorded here. In view of the magnificent decree and generosity of Artaxerxes, the company was very small. The majority preferred Babylon and remained there. The faithful ones are known to God, and their names are here written forever in His Word. The Gentile king had given the decree, and the people had everything they needed in plenty. Even so, the undertaking was one of faith. They came out of Babylon trusting the LORD, and they marched on in faith. Notice especially that only males are mentioned. The mixed marriages we read about in the next chapter were most likely the result of no women joining Ezra's expedition.
These men had a choice between comfort and the place God had chosen.
The men listed in the first 14 verses, together with their families, went with Ezra. It would have been so much easier for them to settle in Mesopotamia where they had grown up, but they return to the place of God's choice (Deut. 12), and God is with them.
Bigvai is not a new name. His descendants appear in the earlier return as well:
He was an ancestor of some who returned from exile. One of them had the same name and sealed the covenant. Ezra 2:2, 14; Ezra 8:14; Neh. 7:7, 19; Neh. 10:16.
So this second list is not a repeat of the first. One writer compares the two returns:
The earlier return included several priests with their many houses (Ezra 2:36-39). Now only two volunteered, with no mention of their houses. At first no Levites offered themselves to Ezra; but this drew out his zeal, and not without fruit. Of the people, some fresh families now returned; of other families a fresh part.
The tone of the whole expedition explains why a short list is no embarrassment:
As it was the day of the people's humiliation, not power but pity and devotedness in obedience marked Ezra. God will have reality in those He honours; false pretensions He hates. What we see here is communion with His mind, suited to His people's state. From a small beginning that made no show, blessing came to quite a few.
- Grace starts it. God produced the willingness to leave Babylon in their hearts, then credited it back to them as their own response.
- Grace names them. He valued that response, so He put their names and even their numbers on lasting record. The names of those who stayed are nearly all lost.
- Grace costs them. Staying in Mesopotamia would have been far easier. Going took faith: the king's decree supplied the means, not the courage.
- Grace finds a few. Some families came whole, some sent only a part, and only two priests volunteered. Most preferred Babylon and stayed.
- Grace works small. God wants reality, not display. From this modest beginning, blessing came to many.
And I gathered them together at the river that runs to Ahava; and there we encamped three days; and I surveyed the people and the priests, and found none of the sons of Levi there.
Three days out from Babylon, Ezra stopped his company and counted them, finding priests but not one Levite. So what does it mean when the people best fitted to serve God's house are the least willing to go?
The stop at Ahava was a review, not a delay.
Ezra gathered them together at the river that runs to Ahava, which was probably a branch of the Euphrates, near Babylon. There they lived in their tents for three days. They were pilgrims and strangers, and had gone out like Abraham, the father of the nation. Ezra reviewed the people and discovered that the Levites were absent.
Ezra found two priests in the camp, and no Levites at all. That absence pointed to the state of the whole nation.
There were two priests, but only two. Well might Ezra have been concerned, for it was a sad sign of the state into which the people had fallen. The priests alone had access to the holy place of the house of their God. The Levites alone were the appointed ministers in everything connected with its service. Yet when the call came that they might return and take up their privileges again, they stayed unmoved and indifferent.
Another writer asks what the Levites preferred instead.
How sad this shortage was! Their main concern was the temple of God at Jerusalem. Of all people, the Levites should have been the most eager to return there, since they were temple servants by right. Were they content to settle down in Babylon, concerned only for their own comfort in a world at enmity with God?
Babylon had once been the place where Israel wept over what it had lost. By Ezra's day it was home. That shift, writers say, is how spiritual privileges get traded away.
They had found a home in the very place where their fathers had hung their harps on the willows and wept when they remembered Zion. And it is the same with God's people now. The moment they are tempted by the enemy to "set their minds on earthly things," they become careless of their spiritual privileges.
The same absence was read as a failure of drive rather than of calling — the men existed, the willingness did not.
There was a lack in the work, you notice, a lack of energy for the work.
He would not travel on with what he had.
He had the means for the proper service of God's house, but where were the ministers? He found none of the sons of Levi, and he would take no part in disorder in divine things. So in that difficulty he sent for chief men and men of understanding and gave them a charge to a district where there were Levites.
He treated their absence as something that could still change.
He knew the needs of the Lord's house. It pained this devoted servant to find them caring for their own things rather than for the courts of Jehovah. He therefore took steps to reach their consciences, so that they might still join him in his mission to Jerusalem.
The Nethinim were servants attached to the temple. The numbers that finally came leave a question that outlasts Ezra's day.
At last 38 Levites come! There are 220 Nethinim, or about six servants for each Levite! Isn't a situation like this very humiliating, and can we not find instruction in it for ourselves as well? Where are the ministers among the people of God? For the ministers today correspond to the Levites of those days. Where are those who serve the house of God and fill the roles God has assigned them? Why is there this scarcity and poverty?
Ezra still traced the help that came to God's hand.
Despite everything, we find this expression: "The good hand of our God was upon us" — the only resource Ezra could count on. The help given to them was not enough, and it revealed the great gaps caused by the people's ruin. Even so, there was some help, and the Lord did not abandon His own.
- Review. Ezra stopped the company and counted. The count found what the excitement had hidden: not one Levite.
- Absence. The missing men were the ones appointed to serve God's house. Their silence showed how far the nation had drifted.
- Comfort. Babylon was once the place of tears over Zion. By Ezra's day it was home. Settle into earthly things, and spiritual privileges stop feeling like privileges.
- Refusal. Ezra would not travel on with the means but no ministers. The state of the Lord's house pained him, so he sent men to reach their consciences.
- Supply. The answer came small: thirty-eight Levites. Yet it came under the good hand of God, who does not abandon His own even in shortage.
And I sent for Eliezer, for Ariel, for Shemaiah, and for Elnathan, and for Jarib, and for Elnathan, and for Nathan, and for Zechariah, and for Meshullam, chief men, and for Joiarib and for Elnathan, men of understanding.
At the river Ahava, Ezra reviewed the company he had gathered for the journey to Jerusalem. One group was missing. So he called out nine leading men by name, along with two more he calls men of insight, and sent them on an errand. Why did the gap matter so much, and why these men?
Ezra sent for these men because of what he had just found in the camp.
There were two, but only two, priests... but of the family of Levi, outside the priesthood, there was absolutely not one. Ezra had every reason to be concerned, for it was a sad symptom of the state into which the people had fallen. Only the priests could enter the holy place of the house of their God. Only the Levites served as the appointed ministers in everything connected with its service. Yet when the call went out that they could return and take up their privileges again, they were untouched and indifferent. They had found a home in the very place where their fathers had hung their harps on the willows and wept when they remembered Zion.
The missing Levites were not a detail Ezra could overlook.
The lack of Levites grieved Ezra as he carefully reviewed the company that had gathered at the river that runs to Ahava. He had the means for the proper service of God's house, but where were the ministers? He found none of the sons of Levi, and he would take no part in disorder in divine things. So in this difficulty he sent for chiefs and men of understanding and gave them a charge to a district where Levites were living.
Ezra names nine of them as chief men, and marks out Joiarib and Elnathan as men of insight. He chose them to reach the Levites who had stayed behind.
He therefore took steps to reach their consciences, so that they might still join him in his mission to Jerusalem. To this end he sent for some of their chief men, among them Joiarib and Elnathan, "men of understanding." In times of decay and corruption, it is good for the people of God when some men of understanding still remain. Through such men God keeps His saints from sinking even deeper, and keeps alive whatever faith and hope may remain.
Ezra told them exactly whom to approach and what to ask.
Ezra was not content to go to Jerusalem without Levites. So he called for several leaders among the Jews and told them to speak to Iddo, the chief man at the place Casiphia. That must have been a place where Levites and Nethinim had gathered. They were to tell him that Levites and Nethinim were needed for the service of the house of God at Jerusalem.
(The Nethinim were temple helpers given for the service of the Levites.) The errand worked.
God gave effect to his desire, and nearly forty Levites answered the call, along with more than two hundred Nethinim. Their service was lowly, but to their honour every one of them was named.
Ezra's earnestness had a source, and it links him to the Lord Jesus.
Of the Lord Jesus it is said — or rather, speaking in spirit, He Himself said — "Zeal for your house will consume me" (Psalm 69:9; John 2:17). This was because the glory of the Father was always His supreme object. God's name and God's honour were always the delight of His soul. And Ezra too, in his measure, desired the Lord's honour in His house, and was therefore in fellowship with the heart of God Himself. This was the secret of his earnestness in seeking to get ministers for the house of our God.
The Levites' indifference is a warning to us.
How sad this lack of Levites was! The main concern of the people was the temple of God at Jerusalem. Of all people, the Levites should have been the most eager to return, for temple service was their proper work. Were they content to settle down in Babylon, concerned only for their own comfort in the middle of a world at enmity with God? Let us not be like them. Let us put God's interests first and be willing to work for the blessing of His present house, the Church of God.
- The lack. No sons of Levi came. Babylon had become home to them, and their absence showed how far the people had fallen.
- The refusal. Ezra had the means for the service of God's house, but not the ministers. He would take no part in disorder in divine things.
- The men. He sent chief men and men of insight. In times of decay, God uses such men to keep faith and hope alive.
- The errand. They carried Ezra's words to Iddo at Casiphia, and nearly forty Levites came back with them, along with more than two hundred Nethinim.
- The motive. Behind it all was zeal for God's house. That zeal put Ezra in fellowship with the heart of God. Do God's interests come first with us?
And I gave them a commission to Iddo the chief, at the place Casiphia, and I put words in their mouths to say to Iddo [and] his brethren the Nethinim, at the place Casiphia, that they should bring to us ministers for the house of our God.
Ezra has gathered his company by the river Ahava for the journey from Babylon to Jerusalem. One group is missing — the Levites, the family God set apart to serve at His house. So Ezra sends men to a place called Casiphia with words to say to Iddo: send us ministers for the house of our God.
The muster at Ahava turned up not a single Levite. One writer explains why that gap mattered:
The priests alone enjoyed access to the holy place of the house of their God, and the Levites alone were the appointed ministers in everything that belonged to its service. Yet when the proclamation was made that they might return and once more take up their privileges, they were untouched and indifferent. They had found a home in the very place where their fathers had hung their harps on the willows and wept when they remembered Zion. No child of God who understands his heavenly calling could be content to live in Babylon.
The verse names a place and a man most readers have never met:
Ezra was not content to go to Jerusalem without Levites. So he called for leaders among the Jews and commanded them to speak to Iddo, the chief man at the place Casiphia. It must have been a place where Levites and Nethinim had gathered.
Ezra's message went to Iddo "and his brothers and the temple servants" — the Nethinim in older translations. The name explains their place:
The name means 'given, devoted ones.' It applies to those who assisted the Levites in the service of the tabernacle and the temple… It does not appear that God appointed them, as He did the Levites. Instead, 'David and the princes' appointed them 'for the service of the Levites' (Ezra 8:20)… After the return from exile the Nethinim are called the 'ministers of this house of God.'
Ezra was after more than bodies. He wanted to reach the consciences of the Levites who had stayed behind, and the men he chose for the errand were men of understanding:
It pained this devoted servant to find them caring for their own things rather than for the courts of the Lord. He took steps to reach their consciences, so that they might even yet join him in his mission to Jerusalem. It is well for the people of God when, in times of decay and corruption, there are still men of understanding to be found. It is by these that God preserves His saints from sinking into still deeper depths, and keeps alive whatever faith and hope may still remain.
Notice the phrase: ministers for the house of our God. Ezra's concern was God's honour:
Of the Lord Jesus it is said — or rather, speaking in spirit, He Himself said — "For zeal for your house has consumed me" (Psalm 69:9; John 2:17). This was because the glory of the Father was always His supreme object. God's name and God's honour were always the delight of His soul. And Ezra too, in his measure, desired the Lord's honour in His house, and so was in fellowship with the heart of God Himself. This was the secret of his eagerness to get ministers for the house of our God.
Ezra could have set out without them. He refused to:
He had the means for the proper service of God's house, but where were the ministers? He found none of the sons of Levi, and he would take no part in disorder in divine things. God gave effect to his desire.
The answer that came back was thin. Ezra credits it to God anyway:
Despite everything, we find this expression: "The good hand of our God was upon us" (v. 18). That was the only resource Ezra could count on. And if the help granted to them was not enough, that showed the wide gaps left by the people's ruin. At least there was some help, and the Lord did not abandon His own.
One writer counts the result and brings the shortage into the present:
Only 38 Levites are found, and 220 servants (Nethinim), but at least this small number join Ezra and those with him. There seems to be a chronic shortage of 'Levites', people who take care of the house and people of God (Numbers 3:7) — may many hear the call today!
- Gap. Ezra reviewed his company and found no Levites. The family God appointed to serve His house was missing.
- Cause. They had made a home in Babylon and were indifferent to privileges that were theirs for the taking.
- Errand. Instead of moving on, Ezra sent men of understanding to Iddo at Casiphia to ask for ministers for the house of God.
- Motive. The phrase "the house of our God" reveals the drive behind it — Ezra shared God's own concern for His honour, in the spirit of the words "zeal for your house has consumed me."
- Result. The answer came — incomplete but real. Ezra called it the good hand of God upon them. The same shortage is a call still worth hearing.
And by the good hand of our God upon us, they brought us a man of understanding, of the sons of Mahli, the son of Levi, the son of Israel, namely, Sherebiah, with his sons and his brethren, eighteen;
Ezra had gathered a company to travel from Babylon back to Jerusalem, but when he reviewed them he found no Levites — none of the family appointed to serve God's house. He sent men to plead for help, and this verse records the answer, which Ezra credits to God's good hand.
The problem was not a shortage of people but a shortage of the right people.
There were two, but only two, priests. But of the family of Levi, outside the priesthood, there was absolutely not one. Ezra might well have been concerned, for it was a sad symptom of the state the people had fallen into. The Levites alone were the appointed ministers in everything that belonged to the service of God's house. Yet when the announcement came that they might return and take up their privileges again, they were untouched and indifferent. They had found a home in the very place where their fathers had hung their harps on the willows and wept when they remembered Zion.
Ezra had everything else he needed, and he refused to paper over the gap.
The lack of Levites grieved Ezra as he carefully reviewed the company gathered at the river that runs to Ahava. He had the means for the proper service of God's house, but where were the ministers? He would take no part in disorder in divine things. So in this difficulty he sent for leading men and men of understanding and gave them a commission to a place where Levites were.
Ezra did not give up on the Levites. He sent men of understanding to reach them, and they brought back a man of discretion.
He took steps to reach their consciences, so that they might still join him in his mission to Jerusalem. So he sent for some of their leading men, including Joiarib and Elnathan, "men of understanding." It is good for the people of God when, in times of decay and corruption, there are still men of understanding to be found. It is by these that God keeps His people from sinking into still deeper depths, and keeps alive whatever faith and hope may remain.
Ezra wanted ministers for one reason: the honour of God's house.
It is said of the Lord Jesus, or rather, speaking in spirit, He Himself said, "Zeal for your house has consumed me" (Psalm 69:9; John 2:17). He said this because the Father's glory was always His supreme object. God's name and God's honour were always the delight of His soul. And Ezra too, in his measure, desired the Lord's honour in His house, and was therefore in fellowship with the heart of God Himself. This was the secret of his earnestness in seeking to obtain ministers for the house of our God.
Ezra opens the verse by crediting God's good hand, not his own effort.
Despite everything, we find this expression: "the good hand of our God on us" (v. 18), the only resource Ezra could count on. Even if the help granted to them was not enough, it revealed the great gaps caused by the people's ruin. At least there was some help, and the Lord did not abandon His own.
That same hand runs through Ezra's whole story, and it reaches us too.
We meet this phrase many times (7:6, 9, 28; 8:18, 22, 31); and it shows how this man of God trusted the Lord for guidance. It was the good hand of God who brought him to Jerusalem (7:9). His hand strengthened him (7:28). Ezra acknowledges the good hand of the Lord again in bringing them ministers (8:18) and in deliverance (8:31). The same hand that was for good upon Ezra, which guided, kept and shielded him, is still upon all His people who trust Him and obey His Word.
Ezra's appeal worked, but the answer was small: far more temple servants than Levites. That raises a question for today.
At last 38 Levites come! There are 220 Nethinim, or about six servants for each Levite! Isn't a situation like this very humbling, and can we not find instruction in it for ourselves as well? Where are the ministers among the people of God? As we have said more than once, the ministers today correspond to the Levites of those days. Where are those who serve the house of God and fill the roles God has assigned them? Why is there this scarcity and poverty?
- Gap. Ezra reviewed his company and found not one Levite. Those appointed to serve God's house had settled in Babylon and ignored the call home.
- Grief. He had the means for the service of God's house but no ministers. He would take no part in disorder in divine things, so he stopped and sent for help.
- Gift. Ezra sent "men of understanding." In times of decay, God uses such men to keep His people from sinking further.
- Hand. Ezra credited the men who came to God's good hand, his one resource. That same hand guided, kept and shielded him.
- Question. The answer came, but small: far more servants than Levites. Where are the ministers for God's house now?
and Hashabiah, and with him Isaiah of the sons of Merari, his brethren and their sons, twenty;
Ezra had camped by the river Ahava with the gold, the silver and the king's permission — everything but the men who were to serve in God's house. This verse records part of the answer to that gap: help came from the line of Merari.
Ezra counted his company before leaving, and the count exposed a hole in it:
The lack of Levites grieved Ezra, as he deliberately reviewed the company that gathered to the river that runs to Ahava. He had the means for the proper service of God's house, but where were the ministers? He found none of the sons of Levi, and he will not take part in disorder in the things of God. So in the difficulty he sent for chiefs and men of understanding, and gave them instructions for a district where Levites lived. God gave effect to his desire. Nearly forty Levites answered the call, along with more than two hundred Nethinim. Their service was lowly, yet to their honour each of them was named.
The reason so few came was not inability:
Ezra reviewed the people and discovered the absence of the Levites. While a small number of Levites had gone up with Zerubbabel, none had joined Ezra... What indifference this reveals! They had settled down in the enemy's land and were satisfied to remain there. They were minding earthly things, and the things of God were forgotten by them. Still they were Levites in their holy calling. It is so today with many who are no doubt saved, but they are worldly-minded, and have little desire to live in the separation He asks of His people.
One writer weighs the numbers of Levites and Nethinim — the servants who came with them:
Already they were very few in Ezra 2, as we have seen, and numbered only 74 persons. Here, not a single Levite presents himself... At last 38 Levites come! There are 220 Nethinim, or about six servants for each Levite! Isn't a situation like this very humiliating, and can we not find instruction in it for ourselves as well? Where are the ministers among the people of God, for, as we have said more than once, the ministers today correspond to the Levites of those days? Where are those who serve the house of God and who fill the functions which God has assigned to them?
Merari was one of Levi's three sons, and his descendants carried a definite charge:
Third son of Levi, and his descendants... The Merarites became a large branch of the Levites. They had charge of the heavier parts of the tabernacle, to carry which they had four wagons and eight oxen. In the land they had twelve cities from among the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and Zebulun... They shared in the duties that fell to the Levites during the kingdom, a third part of the singers and a third part of the door-keepers being Merarites. Some of their descendants returned from exile.
Their load was the frame that held the tent upright, and that frame carries a picture:
They were given the work of caring for the boards of the tabernacle, its bars, pillars and sockets... The boards of the tabernacle speak of the basic facts of what believers are "in Christ," and as united in one building, the Church of God... So Merari points to the ministry that unites believers to Christ and to one another. That ministry depends on the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. Such ministry is of great importance in our present day.
Ezra does not credit his own messengers for this result:
In all this the hand of the Lord is acknowledged. "The hand of the LORD his God was on him." We meet this phrase many times (7:6, 9, 28; 8:18, 22, 31), and it shows how this man of God trusted in the LORD for guidance... It was the good hand of God who brought him to Jerusalem (7:9). His hand strengthened him (7:28). The good hand of the LORD is again acknowledged in bringing them ministers (8:18) and in deliverance (8:31). The same hand which was for good upon Ezra, which guided, kept and shielded him, is still upon all His people who trust Him and are obedient to His Word.
Having received help once, Ezra did not treat it as a reason to relax:
Ezra saw, however, that they had very definitely received help from God in the past. That did not free them from the need to depend on Him now. So they must seek His face again before they started.
- Gap — Ezra reviewed his company and found no sons of Levi. He had the wealth for God's house but not the workers, and he refused to go on as if that were fine.
- Cause — The missing Levites had settled in the enemy's land, minding earthly things, though their calling had not changed. Commentators say the same of believers who are saved but worldly-minded.
- Call — Ezra sent chief men and men of understanding to a district where Levites lived, and God gave effect to his desire.
- Gift — The Merarites of this verse came by the good hand of God, the same hand Ezra names for his journey, his strengthening and his deliverance.
- Charge — Merari's old work was the boards, bars and sockets that held the tabernacle together — a picture of the ministry that unites believers to Christ and to one another.
and of the Nethinim, whom David and the princes had appointed for the service of the Levites, two hundred and twenty Nethinim all of them were expressed by name.
Ezra's caravan back to Jerusalem included 220 temple servants — the Nethinim of older translations. David and his officials had set them apart to help the Levites. Two questions follow: who were these servants, and why does the verse name every one of them?
Start with the name. One dictionary explains what it means and who gave these servants their place:
Another writer adds what tradition says about where they came from:
The word means "given" or "devoted," that is, to God... According to Ezra 8:20 this order originated with King David. Jewish tradition identifies them with the Gibeonites. Joshua appointed the Gibeonites as helpers to the Levites (Joshua 9:3-27). Whatever their origin, they were devoted servants of God with certain duties in the temple.
No writer treats the link as proven.
One writer follows the Gibeon link and sees mercy in their bondage:
Here, then, we probably find the origin of the Nethinim. God spared them from His own just judgment. If they came into slave-like bondage, it was bondage in His mercy, tied to His house. So the very curse resting on them (see Joshua 9:23) turned into a blessing. For what do we find? The sword of the Lord's army did not destroy them; they were rescued. Centuries later they stand in honourable company with the Lord's people, and with a heart for the Lord's house too, since they returned from Babylon with their fellow captives at this special moment.
Now set the numbers side by side. The servants far outnumbered the Levites:
There were still fewer than forty Levites, while there were two hundred and twenty Nethinim. That proves again what the comfortable ease of Babylon had done. The hopes and privileges of the nation had lost all practical power over their minds. Next to the laziness of the Levites, it is beautiful to notice how many Nethinim (probably of a foreign race) obeyed Ezra's call.
The verse ends by noting that all were mentioned by name. One writer ties that to the kind of service they did:
The lack of Levites grieved Ezra as he reviewed with care the company gathered at the river that runs to Ahava. He had the means for the proper service of God's house, but where were the ministers?... God gave effect to his desire. Nearly forty Levites answered the call, with more than two hundred Nethinim. Their service was lowly, yet the record names every one of them, to their honour.
Another writer asks why the verse bothers to say it:
It may be with reference to this faithfulness that the verse says, "These were all mentioned by name." God notices their faithfulness, and had it written down.
The Nethinim did not lead worship; they made it possible. One writer draws the line straight into ordinary life:
In Ezra 8:20 we read of the temple servants, "whom David and his officials had set apart to attend the Levites." In our day they would perhaps match those who do many services behind the scenes. Many things are necessary and have to be done week by week. People may often take them for granted, but someone has to do them.
The same writer names what holds such servants together:
True devotion to the work and interests of the Lord would surely bind the saints together.
- Given. Their name means "given, devoted ones." They helped the Levites, and after the exile Scripture calls them ministers of God's house.
- Spared. If they came from Gibeon, God turned a curse into mercy. He kept them alive, kept them near His house, and gave them honourable company among His people.
- Willing. When Ezra called, 220 of them came, and fewer than forty Levites. The ones with the smaller claim showed the larger heart.
- Named. Lowly work was not nameless work. God noticed their faithfulness and had every name written down.
- Devoted. Today they match the people who do the needed work behind the scenes. Devotion to the Lord's work binds servants of every rank together.
And I proclaimed a fast there, at the river Ahava, that we might humble ourselves before our God, to seek of him a right way for us, and for our little ones, and for all our substance.
Ezra has gathered the returning exiles by the river Ahava. A long and dangerous journey to Jerusalem lies ahead, and he calls the whole company to fast. What he asks for is striking. So is what he refuses to ask for. The verse also raises a question: what does humbling ourselves before God achieve?
The fast is not a technique for getting strength. One writer says plainly what the fast was for:
"Then I proclaimed a fast there, at the river Ahava, that we might humble ourselves before our God." That is the point. They are not asking for power. They are humbling themselves before God. It is a lowering of spirit before the Lord, so that the Lord may be able to entrust us with a blessing.
The fast was a physical act, and it carried a meaning. It covered two needs at once: the way to go, and safety along it. Older versions read "a right way" where the ESV reads "a safe journey", so guidance is in view too.
He proclaimed a fast. The man of God felt the need to seek God's face and His gracious protection. The fasting was the outward sign of deep humbling. It also expressed their dependence, as they sought from Him "a safe journey for ourselves, our children, and all our goods." The gathered company saw that they needed guidance as well as protection, and they trusted the LORD for both.
God had already helped them on the way to this point. That earlier help did not settle the next stage of the road.
Ezra recognized, however, that God had clearly helped them in the past. That did not free them from depending on Him now. So they had to seek His face again before they started. Following the customs of the law, he proclaimed a fast, so that they might humble their souls before God and seek from Him the right way for their journey.
Not everyone who joined the caravan came for the same reason. Being humbled before God exposes what a person is really after. The writer calls our natural self "the flesh".
The flesh cannot be used, in any shape or form, in the Lord's service. Only when we are truly cut off from everything it feeds on, and are humbled in the presence of God, do our motives, aims and goals get tested and come to light. So among those who had gathered around Ezra, some may have been drawn by other things than the good of the house of their God... Ezra, then, wanted everyone searched by the light of God's holy presence. They would learn that nothing could protect and guide them on their journey but the good hand of their God.
The trouble on the road is not only Ezra's. One writer applies the scene to our own difficulties.
The enemy lies in wait for us. He puts himself between us and a simple duty we have to carry out... We have no strength to resist him... Satan would like to push us into meeting him with the king's "band of soldiers and horsemen" — with the weapons of the flesh. He knows he will beat us if we fight him with his own weapons. What should we do? The same thing Ezra did. Let us keep on with fasting, humbling and prayer, and we may be certain that God will answer us.
Ezra prayed as well as fasted. One writer defines each, quoting the Lord's words from an older translation.
Note this: Ezra and his little band prayed and fasted. The two go together. It is a principle that runs right through Scripture. When the disciples had no power to act in the face of evil, the Lord gently rebuked them, saying, "This kind does not go out except by prayer and fasting." As it has been well put, prayer is bringing God in, and fasting is shutting man out.
Ezra called the whole company to fast, not himself alone. One writer asks what that would mean for work God's people share.
Our question is about waiting on God together, with fasting, before we start work that God's people share an interest in. The early Church understood this. We read, "There were in the church at Antioch prophets... As they ministered to the Lord and fasted, the Holy Spirit said, Set apart Barnabas and Saul for me, for the work to which I have called them." (Acts 13:1-2.) Suppose that practice were revived in the power of the Holy Spirit — copying it without that power would be worse than useless. Then we could expect far larger results from service in teaching and ministry.
- Humbling first. The fast was not a request for power but a lowering of spirit — the state in which God can entrust a blessing.
- Sifting next. Time in God's presence tests motives and shows that nothing but His good hand will carry a journey or a service.
- Shutting man out. Prayer brings God in; fasting shuts man out — which is why the two always travel together.
- Whole household covered. They asked for two things: the right way, and safety on it. The request took in their children and all they owned.
- Again, and together. Past help never excuses us from seeking His face for the next stage. Ezra sought it with the whole company, before the work began.
For I was ashamed to require of the king a band of soldiers and horsemen to help us against the enemy in the way; for we had spoken to the king saying, The hand of our God is upon all them for good that seek him; but his power and his anger is against all them that forsake him.
Ezra stands at the river Ahava with families, temple treasure, and a long road through hostile country. He will not ask the king for soldiers, and the reason goes back to what he had already told the king about his God.
Ordinary caution pointed one way. Ezra's own words to the king pointed the other.
Travelling in those days was not safe or easy, so worldly caution would have called for an armed escort. Ezra did not ask for one, and in verse 22 we have his touching confession about it. He had spoken very plainly to the king about the care of his God for His people, and about His wrath against those who forsake Him. So he was ashamed to depart in practice from what he had professed. He was on God's business, and so did not need to rely on worldly support.
Ezra's reputation was not the main thing at risk. The king was watching, and God had already turned his heart.
If Ezra had asked for a guard of soldiers, his boasting would have been mere brag. It would also have damaged the character of his God in the eyes of the king. And God had so wonderfully turned that king's heart to Himself and His people.
The escort was there for the asking, and most leaders would have taken it.
Others would have been tempted to "ask the king for a band of soldiers and horsemen to protect them against the enemy on the way". This thought does not even enter godly Ezra's heart; he would have been ashamed to feed such a thought and give it free rein. Had he not told the king that the hand of our God is for good on all who seek Him, and that the power of His wrath is against all who forsake Him? Would he say: I trust in the Lord, and then contradict that same confession by adding: But that is not quite enough for me — I must trust in man as well? No, this weak remnant fast and humble themselves, and pray to God.
Having turned down the soldiers, Ezra does not ask God for a show of strength either. He goes lower instead, and God Himself becomes their protection.
"Then I proclaimed a fast there, at the river Ahava, that we might humble ourselves before our God." That is the point. It is not asking for power, but humbling themselves before God. It is a humbled spirit before the Lord, so that the Lord may be able to entrust us with a blessing... And instead of a band of soldiers protecting them, God protected them, which was much better. So they came up through all their enemies.
Prayer and fasting came together here, and each does a distinct thing.
Notice, Ezra and his little band prayed and fasted. The two go together. It is a principle that runs right through Scripture. The disciples once had no power to act in the presence of evil. The Lord mildly rebuked them, saying, "This kind never comes out except by prayer and fasting." As it has been well put, prayer is bringing God in, and fasting is shutting man out.
[A. J. Pollock](https://truebibleanswers.com/cite/stempublishing.com/authors/pollock/magazines/
Nehemiah later travelled with a royal escort and did not refuse it. The two men carried different responsibilities.
Notice an important difference between Ezra and Nehemiah. It still casts no blame on Nehemiah. In Ezra, faith alone is active... Nehemiah, on the other hand, puts himself under the protection of the governors beyond the river. He does not object when the king offers his army captains and horsemen as an escort. He accepts the support of the protecting power he serves, not from any lack of faith. In these low times faith does not show itself with the same simplicity... The greater the treasure entrusted to him, the more necessary it was to show the world that faith turned to God to keep what belonged to Him.
The pressure Ezra felt has a modern form: an enemy in the road, no visible strength, and a ready offer of help on the world's terms.
Satan would like to provoke us to meet him with the king's "band of soldiers and horsemen", with the weapons of the flesh, knowing that we will be defeated if we use his own weapons against him. What is to be done? The same thing Ezra did: let us persevere in fasting, humbling ourselves and prayer, and we may be certain that God will answer us. "He was entreated of us", Ezra says.
The test is not what we claim about God but what we reach for when the claim costs something.
Think how easy it is in our day to profess much confidence in God about how we carry on His work. Then the test comes, we face some very practical questions, and we fail. We may well be ashamed when an adversary can reproach us by calling on us to practise what we preach.
- The word — Ezra had told the king where God's hand rests. Every later choice had to match that word.
- The shame — his shame was consistency, not weakness. Asking for troops would have turned his words about God into mere brag before a watching king.
- The refusal — trusting the Lord and hiring a guard as well would have contradicted his own confession.
- The fast — he asked not for power but for humbling; prayer brings God in, fasting shuts man out.
- The proof — no soldiers went with them, and God brought them through their enemies. The more He entrusts to us, the more the world must see that faith, not an escort, keeps what belongs to Him.
And we fasted, and besought our God for this; and he was entreated of us.
Ezra stands at the river Ahava. With him are families, a fortune in temple silver and gold, and a long road through hostile country. He has refused the armed guard the king would have given him. This verse records what he did instead, and what came of it.
One writer explains what the fast was really for:
It is not asking for power, but humbling themselves before God. It is humiliation of spirit before the Lord, so that the Lord may be able to entrust us with a blessing.
Ezra had told the king that God's hand is on those who seek Him. Having said it out loud, he could not then hedge his bet:
Others would have been tempted to ask the king for a band of soldiers and horsemen to protect them against the enemy. This thought does not even enter the heart of godly Ezra... Could he say: I trust in the Lord, and then deny that same confession? Could he add: But that is not quite enough for me, I must trust in man as well? No, this weak remnant fast and humble themselves, and pray to God.
This is a warning to anyone whose trust in God is only spoken:
Consider how easy it is for us today to profess great confidence in God about how we carry on His work. It is just as easy to fail when the test comes and we face some very practical questions. We may well be ashamed when an opponent can reproach us by calling on us to practise what we preach.
The fast also did something to the people who kept it:
The flesh cannot be used, in any shape or form, in the Lord's service. Only two things test our motives, aims, and objects and make them clear: true separation from everything the flesh might feed on, and humiliation in the presence of God. So among those gathered around Ezra, some might have come for other things than the welfare of the house of their God... Ezra therefore wanted everyone searched by the light of God's holy presence. They had one thing to learn. Only the good hand of their God would protect and guide them on the journey, and only that hand could sustain them along the way and in their later service.
The rest of the chapter shows what the road held:
The reader should notice that the danger Ezra spoke of was not imaginary. Later he records, to the praise of his God, that "He delivered us from the hand of the enemy and from ambushes by the way" (v. 31). God is the refuge and strength of His people, a very present help in trouble. They would know this better if, like Ezra, they learned to count on Him as enough in every circumstance.
That protection came through means Ezra never saw on the road:
He knew his God was the best shield. His angels — the servants used to guard His people and keep evil away — would be the unseen companions of the caravan... Their prayers were answered. And He still answers faith.
The pattern here is not private devotion but a company waiting on God before it moves:
The question may well arise whether in our day we take up our service for God too easily. Before we begin anything for God, would it not help spiritual power and effectiveness if we were more often found in this attitude of Ezra and his companions?... Our question concerns waiting on God together, with fasting, before we start work in which the saints at large have a common interest. It was understood in the early Church.
Nehemiah later made the same journey leaning on the king's protection. Commentators read that differently. Dennett says faith was not so active in him, though he had a true heart for the Lord's interests. Another writer does not blame him:
He acknowledges the support of the protecting power he serves. This was not from any lack of faith. It was because in these low times faith does not show itself with the same simplicity. When the temple was completed, Ezra had only to carry gifts to the house of the Lord. The greater the treasure entrusted to him, the more he had to show the world one thing: faith turned to God to keep what belonged to Him.
- Humbling first. The fast was not a bid for power but humiliation of spirit, so that the Lord could entrust them with a blessing.
- Then refusing. Ezra had told the king that God's hand is on those who seek Him. He would not then trust man as well.
- Then sifting. Time before God searched the company's motives and left them nothing to lean on but the good hand of their God.
- Then asking together. This was collective waiting on God before a shared work — a practice the early Church knew.
- Then answered. The ambushes were real, the deliverance was real, and He still answers faith.
And I separated twelve of the chiefs of the priests, Sherebiah, Hashabiah, and ten of their brethren with them,
Ezra is about to start a four month journey to Jerusalem carrying a fortune in silver, gold and temple vessels. His first move is to hand that treasure to men he can trust.
The choice was an act of righteous care, made in a spirit of fellowship. One writer links it to the charge later laid on Timothy:
Here we see righteous care and choice of faithful men, and this in no narrow spirit, but of fellowship. He weighed to them the offering for God's house, with a solemn appeal. So the New Testament shows us even more strongly Timothy and others charged in view of the Lord's appearing (1 Tim. 6:13-14; 2 Tim. 4:1-2; Titus 2:13-14).
Trust in God and careful planning went together:
Faith in God did not make Ezra careless. He felt his great responsibility and made the most careful preparations. He set apart twelve of the chief priests, Sherebiah, Hashabiah, and ten of their brothers with them. Levites were also selected by him (8:30). To their custody he committed the holy vessels, as well as the silver and the gold which had been so freely given.
Here is what he handed over:
He weighed out to them 650 talents of silver, articles of silver weighing 100 talents, 100 talents of gold, 20 gold basins and two vessels of fine polished bronze, precious as gold. The 100 talents of gold would be worth close to $800,000. This was no small amount to be entrusted with for a four months journey!
Ezra picked these men for what they were, not for their strength:
The ground of the choice was that they were "holy to the LORD", as were the vessels also (v. 28). As the prophet said, you must be clean if you carry the vessels of the LORD. And this, as we know, was according to the divine order; for only the priests and Levites could touch or carry the holy vessels or furniture of the house of God. (See Num. 4.)
(The prophet's words are quoted here in an older wording; the ESV reads, "purify yourselves, you who bear the vessels of the LORD," Isaiah 52:11.)
Some have used the priests here to defend a clergy class today. One writer calls that a misreading of the old order and of Christianity:
A blind misunderstanding of this, and of the nature of Christianity, has produced the church custom of setting apart an order of men, the clergy, for service in the Church. It is quite true that those who bring anything from the Lord to His people must be set apart for their service. But God does this, not the hands of men. He acts in sovereign grace, through the power of the Holy Spirit. Under law there was a distinct class of men, the priests and the Levites. But God Himself appointed them and set them apart for Himself. Under grace there are still distinctions of gifts and services (1 Cor. 12), yet all believers alike are priests.
Ezra weighed everything into their hands and told them it would be weighed again at Jerusalem:
Ezra did not doubt the faithfulness of the priests he had selected. But like the apostle of a later age, he would "aim at what is honorable not only in the Lord's sight but also in the sight of others" (2 Cor. 8:21). The people may have had full confidence in the integrity of both Ezra and the priests. Even so, Ezra removed all occasion for the enemy's work. He had the vessels, the silver and the gold weighed when they were put into the priests' hands, and weighed again when delivered.
Numbers were part of the safeguard here, and the principle reaches into everyday church life:
Likely these priests were thoroughly trustworthy men, but it was still necessary to have more than one or two in charge of the property. Indeed the more honest a man is, the more he should desire to have his actions carefully examined by others. So too, those who are trusted to handle money in an assembly should be careful to have the amounts and the use of any funds closely checked by others.
One writer draws the parallel between that load and what God has put into our hands:
Ezra and his companions carried a great treasure, doubly precious because it was God's and for the use of His earthly house at Jerusalem. They were anxious to keep it intact and deliver it without loss at the journey's end. We Christians, too, have a treasure, even the Word of God… But there is a danger in not keeping the treasure intact. Remember, if we do not practise the Word of God where we are called upon to practise it, we are losing the treasure.
- Chosen — Ezra's first move with God's treasure was to pick faithful men. That care was righteousness, not suspicion.
- Clean — holiness, not strength, was the qualification. Those who carry the vessels of the LORD must be clean.
- Charged — faith in God made Ezra more careful, not less. Trusting Him never excuses careless handling of what is His.
- Counted — Ezra weighed the treasure in, and had it weighed again on delivery, so no one could blame the carriers. The same rule guards anyone handling money among God's people today.
- Carried — the aim was to deliver every piece without loss. We carry a greater treasure, the Word of God, and we lose it wherever we fail to practise it.
and I weighed to them the silver and the gold and the vessels, the heave-offering for the house of our God, which the king and his counsellors and his princes, and all Israel present, had offered.
Ezra is about to lead a four-month journey from Babylon to Jerusalem with a huge treasure. Two practical questions arise: who may carry what belongs to God, and why does a man of such faith count every coin?
Before the caravan moved, Ezra organised the treasure and the men who would carry it.
Faith in God did not make Ezra careless. He felt his great responsibility and made the most careful preparations. He set apart twelve of the chief priests, Sherebiah, Hashabiah, and ten of their brothers with them. Levites were also selected by him (8:30). To their custody he committed the holy vessels, as well as the silver and the gold which had been so freely given. He had weighed into their hands 650 talents of silver and 100 talents of gold, besides the costly vessels of silver and gold.
Ezra's charge explains his choice: the men were holy, and so was what they carried.
The ground of the choice was that they were "holy to the LORD," as were the vessels also (v. 28). As the prophet said, "purify yourselves, you who bear the vessels of the LORD." This was according to God's order. Only the priests and Levites could touch or carry the holy vessels or furniture of the house of God (see Numbers 4).
Ezra did not hand the treasure to one trusted man, and the reason has nothing to do with suspicion.
These priests were likely thoroughly trustworthy men. But it was still necessary to have more than one or two in charge of the property, to honour the truth that Paul emphasises in 2 Corinthians 8:20-23 — "so that no one should blame us about this generous gift that is being administered by us." Indeed, the more honest a man is, the more he should desire to have his actions carefully examined by others.
The word "weighed" is the hinge of the passage. Ezra weighs it out at the start, and others weigh it again in Jerusalem. That double weighing is the point.
Ezra committed the holy vessels, the silver and the gold to the care of the priests. These had been given as a freewill offering to the LORD God of their fathers. It was not that Ezra doubted the faithfulness of the priests he had selected. Like the apostle of a later age, he would "aim at what is honorable not only in the Lord's sight but also in the sight of man" (2 Corinthians 8:21). Ezra would remove every occasion for the enemy's work. So he had the vessels, the silver and the gold weighed as he put them into the priests' hands, and weighed again on delivery. In this way he proved his own faithfulness and theirs. Surely all who in any way have charge of the offerings of the Lord's people should follow this godly, scriptural example. They should be careful to give an account of their stewardship, and not wait to be pressed for it.
The offering did not come from Israel alone. A foreign king and his advisers gave to the God of Israel, and one writer looks from there to the future.
The king and his seven counsellors freely gave silver and gold "to the God of Israel, whose dwelling is in Jerusalem." A day is coming when God will save all Israel and Christ will come again. Then the Gentiles and their kings will offer their silver and gold (Isaiah 60; Psalm 62:10-11). Artaxerxes and his counsellors gave silver and gold, and others gave too: non-Jews, and the Jewish residents of Babylon.
The treasure faced a second weighing at the end of the road. One writer sees in it a picture of something still ahead for every believer.
On the fourth day after they arrived in Jerusalem, two priests and three Levites weighed the silver and gold and all the articles in the house of God. How right this was, so that everything might be found in proper order. In the same way, at the end of our Christian journey, all our life will be weighed in "the balances of the sanctuary." Do we train ourselves to have "a clear conscience toward both God and man," so that we shall gladly welcome that review? Notice that all the weight was written down at the time (v. 34). So indeed there will be an eternal record of what has been done in true devotion to the Lord.
- Weighed out — Ezra measured the treasure before it moved. Faith in God did not excuse him from careful preparation.
- Weighed to holy hands — Ezra chose men who were holy to the Lord. Only priests and Levites could handle the holy vessels.
- Weighed by many — twelve men carried it, not one, so no one could lay blame. The more honest a person is, the more gladly he invites scrutiny.
- Weighed openly — the double weighing guarded reputations and left the enemy no opening. Anyone who handles money given to God should give an account without being asked.
- Weighed at the end — in Jerusalem they weighed everything again and wrote it down. That pictures the final review, where devotion to the Lord leaves an eternal record.
And I weighed into their hand six hundred and fifty talents of silver; and silver vessels a hundred talents, [and] of gold a hundred talents;
Ezra is about to leave Babylon for Jerusalem with a fortune that is not his own. This verse is the receipt: the silver and the gold, weighed out into named hands. Why such minute bookkeeping in a story about faith, and what does a weighed inventory have to teach people who carry no gold at all?
First, the size of the load and the length of the road.
Before leaving, Ezra also chose twelve leaders of the priests, and ten of their brothers with them, to take charge of the silver, gold and other articles that had been offered for the house of God. These gifts came from the king and his counselors, and from Israelites who were present. Verse 26 lists what was weighed out to them — 650 talents of silver, articles of silver weighing 100 talents, 100 talents of gold, 20 gold basins and two vessels of fine polished bronze, precious as gold. The 100 talents of gold would be worth close to $800,000. This was no small amount to be entrusted with for a four months journey!
Older translations read 100 talents for the silver vessels here, where the ESV reads 200.
Ezra gives his reason for choosing these men.
The ground of the choice was that they were "holy to the LORD," as also were the vessels (v. 28). As the prophet said, "purify yourselves, you who bear the vessels of the LORD." And we know this was according to the divine order. Only the priests and Levites could touch or carry the holy vessels or furniture of the house of God (see Num. 4).
Ezra weighed the treasure twice — once when he handed it over, once when it arrived. The reason was not suspicion.
The expression "weigh them" contains a principle of importance. It was not that Ezra doubted the faithfulness of the priests he had selected. Like the apostle of a later age, he would aim "at what is honorable not only in the Lord's sight but also in the sight of man" (2 Cor. 8:21). The people might have had full confidence in the integrity of both Ezra and the priests. But Ezra would remove every opening for the enemy's work. He had the vessels, and the silver and the gold, weighed when he put them into the priests' hands, and weighed again when they were delivered. In this way he proved his faithfulness and theirs. And surely this is a godly, a scriptural example for anyone who has charge of the offerings of the Lord's people. Such people should be careful to give an account of their stewardship, and not wait until someone presses them for it. It may further be noted that on reaching Jerusalem the weighing was done by others than Ezra, and "the weight of everything was recorded" (vv. 33, 34). In modern language, Ezra's accounts were checked and audited.
One writer turns this into a prayer, and then a warning about ownership.
May we copy them in the responsibilities, great or small, which the Lord entrusts to us. May we never treat anything He puts into our hand as our own. It is something to give back to Him, after we have faithfully managed it for Him. Most of the frauds, great or small, that Christians become guilty of — against authorities or against the world — have no other cause than this. They treat as their own something the Lord has given them to manage... In contrast, the consequence of faithfulness is seen here. God watches over His goods and He preserves those who carry these gifts all along the way.
The list of weights raises a question: what has God weighed into our hands? One writer answers with the Scriptures, and with the loss that comes from holding only part of them.
Ezra and his companions carried a great treasure. It was doubly precious, because it was God's and was for the use of His earthly house at Jerusalem. They were anxious to keep it intact and deliver it without loss at the journey's end. We Christians, too, have a treasure, even the Word of God... But there is a danger in not keeping the treasure intact. Remember, if we do not practise the Word of God where we should practise it, we are losing the treasure. Many Christians pay lip service only to certain parts of the truth... If we part with any part of the treasure, we are losers.
- Weighed out. The inventory was exact — 650 talents of silver, 100 of gold, twenty basins — a fortune handed to twelve men for a four-month road.
- Holy hands. Ezra chose bearers for what they were, not what they could do: those set apart for the Lord carry what is set apart for the Lord.
- Weighed in. The second weighing at Jerusalem proved honesty before people as well as before God. Anyone who handles the offerings of God's people should give an account, unasked.
- Never owned. What God puts in your hand is to manage and hand back. Treating a trust as property is the root of most dishonesty.
- Kept intact. Our weighed treasure is the Word of God — and every part we leave unpractised is treasure lost on the journey.
and twenty basons of gold, of a thousand darics; and two vessels of shining copper, precious as gold.
This verse sits inside an inventory. Ezra is listing, item by item, the treasure he handed to the priests for the long road to Jerusalem. Why does Scripture record the bowls and their weights at all? And why is a copper vessel rated among the precious things?
The word behind "bowls" points to a specific vessel used in the worship of Israel, not a general container.
kephor, 'large cup or bowl,' probably for the wine drunk before the Lord; when Scripture speaks of blood, it uses a different word. 1 Chronicles 28:17; Ezra 1:10; Ezra 8:27.
Translations of this verse differ over the second metal: some say bronze, others copper. A Bible dictionary sorts out which metal it is, and what that metal pictures.
Since 'brass' is a mixture of metals, copper is probably the metal Scripture often means. See Deuteronomy 8:9… The Hebrew word nechosheth is translated 'copper' in Ezra 8:27, where the verse calls it 'precious as gold.' Brass stands for righteousness according to the claims of God upon man, as in the bronze altar. In the vision in Revelation the Lord has feet like fine brass, 'burning as in a furnace': that is, righteous judgement according to responsibility. Revelation 1:15; Revelation 2:18.
Another writer sets the two metals side by side as two figures of righteousness.
Gold — intrinsic divine righteousness. Brass (or copper) — divine righteousness as applied to man in judgement.
Much of this silver, gold and copper came from the king and his officials. Could gifts from such a source be holy to the Lord?
The name of the Lord sanctified these gifts, and so did the character of those who kept them… These gifts came in large part from the king, his counselors and princes, yet nothing about them was defiled. These men had recognised the name of the Lord and His temple, so God could take pleasure in their offerings. But even these material gifts, whether silver or gold, needed the priests to watch over them and guard them well, for nothing must be lost.
Ezra did not just hand the treasure over. He weighed it out, and called for a second weighing at the journey's end.
The words "weigh them" carry an important principle. Ezra did not doubt the faithfulness of the priests he had chosen. Like the apostle of a later age, he would "aim at what is honorable, not only in the Lord's sight but also in the sight of man." (2 Corinthians 8:21.) The people might have had full confidence in the integrity of both Ezra and the priests. But Ezra would remove every occasion for the enemy's work. So he had the vessels, the silver and the gold weighed as he handed them to the priests, and weighed again when they were delivered.
The check at Jerusalem was also taken out of Ezra's own hands.
Note also that when they reached Jerusalem, men other than Ezra did the weighing, and they wrote down the weight of everything at that time. (vv. 33, 34.) In modern language, others checked and audited Ezra's accounts, on the fourth day after their journey ended.
This carried treasure has a parallel for Christians today.
Ezra and his companions carried a great treasure, doubly precious because it was God's and for the use of His earthly house at Jerusalem. They were anxious to keep it intact and deliver it without loss at the journey's end. We Christians, too, have a treasure, even the Word of God… But there is a danger in not keeping the treasure intact. Remember, if we do not practise the Word of God where we are called upon to practise it, we are losing the treasure.
- Given — the bowls and vessels came largely from a foreign king and his officials. God could still take pleasure in their offerings, because these men had recognised His name and His temple.
- Valued — the bowl here is a large cup of the kind used for wine before the Lord, and the copper was so fine it rated as precious as gold.
- Weighed — Ezra measured every item into the priests' hands. This was not suspicion. He aimed at what is honorable in the sight of men as well as of the Lord.
- Guarded — the men who carried it had to watch it and keep it well, because nothing must be lost.
- Delivered — at Jerusalem other men did the weighing and wrote down the totals, and the treasure arrived intact. Christians carry a treasure too, the Word of God, and lose it when they fail to practise it.
And I said to them, Ye are holy unto Jehovah; the vessels also are holy; and the silver and the gold is a voluntary offering to Jehovah the God of your fathers.
Ezra is about to lead a group of returning exiles to Jerusalem, hundreds of miles across open road. They carry a fortune in gold, silver and temple vessels. Before they set out, he does not talk about security. He talks about holiness, and tells twelve chosen priests what they are and what they carry.
Ezra did not choose these men for their strength or their experience. He chose them for what they already were before God.
Next, Ezra "set apart twelve of the leading priests: Sherebiah, Hashabiah, and ten of their brothers," to take charge of the offerings he had received for the house of their God until they reached Jerusalem (vv. 24-30). The ground of the choice was that they were "holy to the LORD," as the vessels were too (v. 28). As the prophet said, "you must be clean who carry the vessels of the LORD." And we know this was according to God's own order, for only the priests and Levites could touch or carry the holy vessels or furniture of the house of God (see Numbers 4).
That line comes from Isaiah 52:11. The ESV reads, "purify yourselves, you who bear the vessels of the LORD." The same standard still holds for those who serve God now.
Isaiah 52:11 contains an important warning for those who serve in the Church. "Purify yourselves, you who bear the vessels of the LORD." This must be kept up. God's priests must have clean hearts, tongues, hands, and feet. If not, they cannot serve in the sanctuary. In earlier days the priests always had to wash their hands and feet. They did this before entering the tabernacle to serve (Exodus 30:19, 20). This pictures the need of continual cleansing by the water of the Word.
Does this mark out a special class of ministers today? One writer contrasts law and grace.
Those who serve the Lord's people must indeed be set apart for their service. But God does this Himself, in grace, by the power of the Holy Spirit, not by human hands. Under law there was a distinct class of men, the priests and the Levites. God Himself appointed them and set them apart. Under grace there are still differences of gifts and services (1 Corinthians 12). Yet all believers alike are priests. As such they have a right no one can take away: to come into the holiest, the immediate presence of God.
Much of this silver and gold had come from a foreign king and his advisers. Ezra still calls it holy — and one writer explains what lifted it above ordinary money.
In verses 24 to 30, the priests and Levites receive the deposit of the holy things: vessels, silver and gold, freely given for the house of God. The name of the Lord made these gifts holy, and so did the character of those who kept them… These gifts came largely from the king, his counsellors and princes, yet nothing had defiled them. These men had acknowledged the name of the Lord and His temple, so God could take pleasure in their offerings.
The charge was not simply to carry the treasure but to guard it until it could be handed over. Commentators read this as a picture of every trust God places in our hands.
Ezra reminded the priests that they themselves were holy to the Lord. What was entrusted to them was holy too (v. 28)… What a reminder for every believer today! God has entrusted the truth of His Word to us. So we should take to heart what Paul writes to Timothy, "O Timothy, guard the deposit entrusted to you" (1 Timothy 6:20). The priests had to give account in Jerusalem for everything placed in their trust. In the same way, we shall give account at the judgment seat of Christ for how we handled the word of God committed to us.
Ezra weighed the treasure into their hands and required it weighed again at the other end. The point of the double weighing was not distrust.
He had weighed into their hand 650 talents of silver… and 100 talents of gold… besides the costly vessels of silver and gold. This careful weighing of everything when they received the costly treasures, and the weighing again when they delivered it in Jerusalem, does not mean that Ezra had any doubt about the honesty of the priests and Levites. It was done to avoid all suspicion. The same principle is laid down in the New Testament for the Church: "we aim at what is honourable not only in the Lord's sight but also in the sight of others" (2 Corinthians 8:21).
These men proved faithful. One writer draws out where most failures in this area begin.
May we copy them in the responsibilities, great or small, the Lord entrusts to us. May we never treat anything He puts into our hand as our own. It is something we give back to Him, after managing it faithfully for Him. Most of the frauds, great or small, that Christians become guilty of… have no other cause than this. They treat as their own personal property something the Lord has given them to manage… In contrast, the result of faithfulness is seen here. God watches over His goods and He preserves those who carry these gifts all along the way.
- Holy bearers. Ezra chose these men because they were holy to the LORD. Only priests and Levites could carry the sanctuary's vessels.
- Holy cargo. Two things set this silver and gold apart from ordinary treasure: the name of the Lord, and the character of those who kept it.
- Holy charge. They were guardians of a deposit, not owners of it — the same charge Paul gave Timothy.
- Holy accounting. The priests answered in Jerusalem for all they carried; we answer at the judgment seat of Christ for God's word.
- Holy outcome. God watches over His own goods, and He guards the people who carry them all the way.
Watch and keep [them] until ye weigh them before the chiefs of the priests and the Levites, and the chiefs of the fathers of Israel, at Jerusalem, in the chambers of the house of Jehovah.
Ezra is about to send a fortune in temple treasure on a long journey, carried by twelve priests he has just set apart. His charge joins two things we often keep apart — holiness before God, and open accounts before people.
The charge rests on what Ezra had just said in verse 28. The men are holy, the vessels are holy, and the silver and gold are a freewill offering. One writer links the safety of the gift to the character of the men who carried it, and points to Paul doing the same:
These gifts were sanctified by the name of the Lord and by the character of those who kept them... But even for these material gifts, silver or gold, the priests had to watch over them and keep them with care, for nothing must be lost. The men entrusted with this deposit had to show absolute faithfulness and integrity. Under grace we see the apostle Paul take the same strict care over the gift entrusted to him. The assemblies of Gentile believers gave it for the saints at Jerusalem (2 Corinthians 8:20).
Ezra did not pick these twelve men at random. Under the law only one group could carry sacred objects, and the prophet had tied that right to being clean:
The ground of the choice was that they were "holy to the LORD," as were the vessels (v. 28). As the prophet said, you must be clean if you carry the vessels of the LORD. And this, we know, was God's own order. Only the priests and Levites could touch or carry the holy vessels or furniture of the house of God (see Numbers 4).
If Ezra trusted God for the journey, why count every coin? One writer answers:
Faith in God did not make Ezra careless. He felt his great responsibility and made the most careful preparations... They weighed everything when they received these costly treasures, and weighed it all again when they delivered it in Jerusalem. This does not mean Ezra had any doubt about the honesty of the priests and Levites. He did it to avoid all suspicion.
The word "weigh" is the key. Ezra fixed the amount at the start so that others could check it at the end.
Like the apostle of a later age, Ezra would "aim at what is honorable, not only in the Lord's sight but also in the sight of man" (2 Corinthians 8:21). The people may have had full confidence in the integrity of both Ezra and the priests. But Ezra would remove every opening for the enemy's work. So he had the vessels, the silver and the gold weighed as he put them into the priests' hands, and weighed again when the priests handed them over... And surely all who in any way have charge of the offerings of the Lord's people should follow this godly, scriptural example. They should be careful to give an account of their stewardship, and not wait for anyone to press them for it.
The verse also names who must witness the weighing: chief priests, Levites, and heads of families. And in the end, someone other than Ezra did the counting:
This practice might have prevented many a difficulty in the church of God. Note also that on reaching Jerusalem, men other than Ezra did the weighing, "and the weight of everything was recorded" (vv. 33, 34). In modern language, someone checked and audited Ezra's accounts, on the fourth day after their journey ended.
Commentators apply the charge in two directions: money held for God's people, and truth held for Him. One writer takes the second road:
Ezra reminded the priests that they themselves were holy to the Lord and that what was entrusted to them was also holy (v. 28)... What a reminder for every believer today! God has entrusted us with the truth of His word. So take to heart what Paul writes to Timothy: "O Timothy, guard the deposit entrusted to you" (1 Timothy 6:20). The priests had to give account in Jerusalem for everything put in their trust. In the same way, we shall give account at the judgment seat of Christ for how we handled the word of God.
- Holy. The treasure was holy, and so were the men who carried it. A gift given to God is only as safe as the character of its carriers.
- Watched. Guarding is active work. Nothing was to be lost on the road, and trusting God never excuses careless handling.
- Weighed. Counted out at the start, counted in at the end. An open record protects the honest steward as much as it exposes the dishonest one.
- Witnessed. Named leaders watched the last weighing, inside the house of the LORD. We show that we answer to God by answering to people.
- Rendered. The journey ended with a full account, and ours will too. Give the report before anyone asks for it.
And the priests and the Levites received by weight the silver and the gold and the vessels, to bring them to Jerusalem unto the house of our God.
Ezra did not pick the twelve at random. One writer ties the choice both to the men and to what they carried.
Next, Ezra "set apart twelve of the leading priests, Sherebiah, Hashabiah, and ten of their brothers." They were to take charge of the offerings he had received for the house of their God until they reached Jerusalem (vv. 24-30). The ground of the choice was that they were "holy to the LORD," as also were the vessels (v. 28). As the prophet said, "purify yourselves, you who bear the vessels of the LORD." And we know this was according to God's order. Only the priests and Levites could touch or carry the holy vessels or furniture of the house of God (see Num. 4).
The treasure came largely from the king and his court. One writer explains why that did not lower its standing.
These gifts were sanctified by the name of the Lord and by the character of those who kept them. Ezra tells them, "You are holy to the LORD; the vessels also are holy; and the silver and the gold are a voluntary offering to the LORD, the God of your fathers" (v. 28). These gifts, coming in large part from the king, counselors and princes, were not defiled in any way. These men had recognized the name of the Lord and His temple, so God could take pleasure in their offerings. But even for these material gifts, whether silver or gold, the priests had to watch over them and keep them safe. Nothing must be lost.
The verse says the priests "took over the weight." Ezra fixed the amount at the start so that the same amount had to appear at the end.
The expression "weigh them" contains a principle of importance. Ezra did not doubt the faithfulness of the priests he had chosen. But like the apostle of a later age, he would "aim at what is honorable not only in the Lord's sight but also in the sight of man" (2 Cor. 8:21). The people may have had full confidence in the integrity of both Ezra and the priests. Still, Ezra would take away every chance for the enemy to work. He had the vessels, the silver and the gold weighed as he put them into the priests' hands, and weighed again when the priests handed them over. In this way he proved his faithfulness and theirs. This is a godly, scriptural example for anyone who has charge of the offerings of the Lord's people. They should take care to give an account of their stewardship, and not wait until someone presses them for it.
The same writer notes who did the weighing at the journey's end.
Adopting this practice would have prevented many a difficulty in the Church of God. Note also that when they reached Jerusalem, men other than Ezra did the weighing, "and all the weight was written at that time" (vv. 33, 34). In modern language, others checked and audited Ezra's accounts, and they did this on the fourth day after their journey ended.
One writer turns this into a warning about what we hold for the Lord.
May we copy them in the responsibilities the Lord entrusts to us, great or small. May we never treat anything He puts into our hand as our own. It is something to give back to Him after we have managed it faithfully for Him. Most frauds that Christians fall into, great or small, whether against authorities or against the world, have no other cause than this. They treat as their own personal property something the Lord has given them to manage.
One writer applies the same trust to believers today.
What a reminder for every believer today! We are entrusted with the truth of the Word of God. We should take to heart what Paul writes to Timothy: "O Timothy, guard the deposit entrusted to you" (1 Tim. 6:20). The priests had to give account in Jerusalem for everything entrusted to them. In the same way, we shall give account at the judgment seat of Christ for the way we handled the word of God entrusted to us.
Another writer sees the charge Ezra gave the twelve echoed in the charges laid on Timothy and Titus — a responsibility measured not by present company but by a future appearing.
Here we see righteous care and choice of faithful men, and this in no narrow spirit, but of fellowship. He separated twelve of the chiefs of the priests, or Levites, and weighed to them the offering for God's house, with a solemn appeal. So the New Testament still more impressively shows us Timothy and others charged in view of the Lord's appearing.
- Holy bearers. Ezra chose the twelve because they were holy to the LORD. Only priests and Levites could carry the holy things.
- Holy trust. The Lord's name set the silver, gold and vessels apart — so nothing could go missing.
- Weighed in. Ezra measured the load into their hands. Not from suspicion, but to be honest before people as well as before the Lord.
- Carried, not owned. What God gives into our hand is never ours. We hold it to hand it back, and most fraud starts where that is forgotten.
- Weighed out. Other hands checked the account in Jerusalem — and ours will be settled at the judgment seat of Christ.
And we departed from the river Ahava on the twelfth of the first month, to go to Jerusalem; and the hand of our God was upon us, and he delivered us from the hand of the enemy, and of such as lay in wait by the way.
Ezra's company leaves the river Ahava for Jerusalem carrying a great treasure and no armed guard. Their safe arrival raises a hard question: is God alone enough protection when the danger is real?
Ezra writes the journey up in a single sentence. The dates around it show how long the test lasted.
In verse 31 we have a short statement concerning their journey. It simply records the faithfulness of their God in answer to their prayers... Ezra 7:9 says they began to go up on the first day of the first month. That was probably the date when the people gathered at the river Ahava. So the journey itself took a little less than four months. Ezra testifies that God safely guided them through all its dangers and shielded them from all their foes. Truly "the name of the LORD is a strong tower; the righteous man runs into it and is safe."
Ezra had boasted to the king about his God. Asking for troops afterwards would have made that boast empty.
If Ezra had asked for a guard of soldiers, his boasting would have been mere talk. It would have damaged the character of his God in the eyes of the king, whose heart God had so wonderfully turned to Himself and His people.
The same test falls on anyone who says they trust God.
It is easy for us today to say we have great confidence in God about how we carry on His work. It is just as easy to fail when the test comes and we face some very practical questions. We may well feel shame when an opponent can reproach us and call on us to practise what we preach.
The mention of ambushes on the road is not decoration.
The reader should notice that the danger Ezra feared was no imaginary one. Afterwards he records, to the praise of his God, that "he delivered us from the hand of the enemy and from ambushes by the way." Surely God is the refuge and strength of His people, and a very present help for them in trouble. They would know it more fully if, like Ezra, they only learned to count on Him as enough in every possible situation.
The treasure was not Ezra's. It belonged to God, and that changes how we hold anything He puts in our hands.
God watches over His goods and He preserves those who carry these gifts all along the way... May we never treat anything He puts into our hand as belonging to us. We hold it to hand back to Him, after we have faithfully managed it for Him.
Nehemiah made the same journey later with army officers and horsemen. Commentators differ on how to read that. Some see a lower level of faith:
Nehemiah did not have the same simple faith. He was a godly and devout man, but he travelled with the show and ceremony of one of the king's governors. That way was more likely to win the respect of the world and the help of the king's servants.
Others decline to blame him, pointing to the difference in what each man carried:
He accepts the support of the protecting power he serves. This is not from any lack of faith. In these low times faith does not show itself with the same simplicity. Ezra, after the temple was finished, had only to carry gifts to the house of the Lord. The greater the treasure he carried, the more he needed to show the world that faith turned to God to keep what belonged to Him.
The point is not admiration for an old story. It is expectation for today.
They must have had many narrow escapes. But they kept trusting in the LORD, in His good hand of mercy and power, and He delivered them from all dangers. The LORD who answered their faith and kept them is the same today, and never disappoints faith. His hand is the same as then, and we too can experience His gracious deliverance.
- Word given. Ezra had told a pagan king that God's hand is for good on all who seek Him — so his own word bound him to act on it.
- Hand sought. They prayed first at Ahava, and Ezra's short travel note is the written answer to those prayers.
- Hand instead of horsemen. Ezra refused a military escort. The danger of ambush was real, and only God stood between them and it.
- Hand upon them. Four months on the road ended in one line of testimony: God guided, shielded, delivered.
- Hand kept the treasure. God guards His own goods and the people who carry them — so hold whatever He gives you as His, not yours.
And we came to Jerusalem, and abode there three days.
Ezra's company carried a fortune in silver, gold and temple vessels from Babylon, with no soldiers to guard them. This verse records the end of that journey, and a pause of three days before anything else happens.
The safe arrival was not luck. One writer traces it back to the faith the company set out with.
They left on the twelfth day of the first month. In faith and complete dependence on God they set out towards the land of their fathers. And the Lord honoured their faith. "The hand of our God was on us, and He delivered us from the hand of the enemy and from ambushes by the way. We came to Jerusalem, and there we remained three days." They must have had many narrow escapes. But they trusted in the Lord all the way, in His good hand of mercy and power, and He delivered them from all dangers. The Lord who answered their faith and kept them is the same today, and never disappoints faith. The journey took not quite four months. The three days at the end of the journey correspond to the three days before the journey began at the river Ahava. What praise they must have given to God during these three days in Jerusalem, when their eyes saw once more the beloved city and the house of the Lord!
Ezra made a deliberate choice about who would guard the treasure.
Vessels of gold and silver and other precious things had to travel from Babylon to Jerusalem. It was a long journey with many dangers. It seems Ezra could have had a military escort from the king for protection along the way. But in true humility he asked the Lord for "a right way." His testimony before the king had been clear and uncompromising — "the hand of our God is for good on all who seek Him." He knew the might of that hand, and the goodness of the heart of God. He had proved this God, so he depended on Him in humility. He cast all his care on Him in full and happy confidence. He refused help from man, and so honoured God before all. All the silver and the gold and the vessels came safely to the house of his God (v. 32).
The count at Jerusalem matched the count taken at the river Ahava.
They finished the journey. This was the second exodus from Babylon. Ezra and his companions reached Jerusalem without any harm or loss on the way. The good hand of their God was with them, and proved itself enough without help from the king. They delivered every treasure in the temple, matching the weight and count taken at the river Ahava. Not a grain of such treasures ever falls to the ground. Here everyone who had left Babylon arrives at Jerusalem.
Another writer notes who actually carried the treasure.
Ezra entrusts the silver and gold, the vessels for the house of God, to twelve of the chief priests. He tells them to look after these treasures, and they prove trustworthy. They weigh and count everything. Good to see: when they arrive it is all there; nothing has gone missing. May it be so with the things the Lord has entrusted to us, whether material or otherwise (1 Tim. 6:20).
The pause was not idleness. Arrival came first, then the handover, then worship.
They reach the journey's end. They rest three days. Then they weigh out the silver and gold and vessels before God, and write down the weight. Then they offer burnt offerings of joy before the Lord.
The same writer turns the episode into questions for the reader.
Have we such confidence in God that we need no protection from men? Do we need human strength to lean on? Do our eyes keep looking this way and that way and every way, until at last we turn to God as a final resource? Or do we turn to Him first?
- Hand asked. Ezra asked God for "a right way" instead of asking the king for soldiers. He had already told the king that God's hand is for good on all who seek Him.
- Hand proved. The safe arrival showed that God's hand was enough on its own. Everyone who set out reached Jerusalem.
- Hand honoured. The journey ended as it began, in faith; the God who answered that faith is the same today and never disappoints it.
- Hand accounted. Twelve priests carried the treasure, and nothing went missing. That is the standard for anyone carrying what belongs to God.
- Hand rested. The three days at the end mirror the three days at the river before they set out. Then came the weighing, the record, and burnt offerings of joy.
And on the fourth day the silver and the gold and the vessels were weighed in the house of our God into the hand of Meremoth the son of Urijah the priest; and with him was Eleazar the son of Phinehas; and with them were Jozabad the son of Jeshua, and Noadiah the son of Binnui, Levites
The caravan from Babylon had carried the temple treasure across four months of dangerous road. On the fourth day after they arrived, named priests and Levites weighed every piece of it inside God's house — so why did Ezra want a formal, witnessed count at the end of the journey?
Nothing went missing on the road. One writer draws a lesson from that for everything the Lord puts in our hands.
Verses 32–34 show the great zeal of the priests and Levites in carrying out their mission. They did their task whole-heartedly. Nothing was missing; the number and weight of all these objects is recorded again. May we imitate them in the responsibilities, great or small, that the Lord entrusts to us. May we never treat anything He puts into our hand as belonging to us. We hold it to hand back to Him, after managing it faithfully for Him.
Ezra had the treasure weighed twice: once into the priests' hands, and once out of them again. That was not suspicion. It was a deliberate way of putting integrity beyond argument.
The phrase "weigh them" carries an important principle. Ezra did not doubt the honesty of the priests he had chosen. But like Paul long afterwards, he would "aim at what is honorable not only in the Lord's sight but also in the sight of man" (2 Cor. 8:21). The people may have had full confidence in the integrity of both Ezra and the priests. But Ezra would remove every occasion for the enemy's work. So he had the vessels, the silver and the gold weighed when they went into the priests' hands, and weighed again when they were handed over. He proved his own fidelity and theirs.
Notice who does the weighing at Jerusalem. Ezra does not check his own delivery. Other hands receive it and record it.
Adopting this practice could have prevented many a difficulty in the Church of God. Notice too that at Jerusalem, men other than Ezra did the weighing, and "the weight of everything was recorded" (vv. 33, 34). In modern language, someone checked and audited Ezra's accounts. That happened on the fourth day after their journey ended.
The verse names four ordinary men. One of them shows up later as a builder of Jerusalem's wall, and the handover itself points to a greater reckoning.
On the fourth day the treasures were handed over and weighed in the house of God. This was done by Meremoth, the son of Uriah, the priest. Nehemiah mentions him as one of the builders of the wall (Neh. 3:4, 21). With him was Eleazar, the son of Phinehas. Associated with them were Jozabad, the son of Jeshua (also mentioned in 10:23 and Neh. 7:7) and Noadiah, the son of Binnui. So in the house of God they rendered an account. In the same way, all His people will have to give an account before the judgment seat of Christ.
The weighing happens after the travelling is over, not during it — and the figures are written down. Commentators see both as a picture of what waits at the end of a believer's road.
On the fourth day after they reached Jerusalem, two priests and three Levites weighed the silver, the gold and all the articles they had carried there, in the house of God. How rightly this was done, so that everything might be found in proper order. In the same way, at the end of our Christian journey, all our life will be weighed in "the balances of the sanctuary." Do we train ourselves now to have "a clear conscience toward both God and man," so that we shall gladly welcome that review? Notice that all the weight was written down at the time (v. 34). So indeed there will be an eternal record of what has been done in true devotion to the Lord.
The place mattered as much as the count. It all happened within the house of our God:
The journey went well. After three days they delivered the offering in God's house, by number and weight, into the proper hands, and recorded it just as properly at the time. And they acknowledged God according to His word, as they could not have done in Babylon.
- Entrusted. What the Lord puts into our hand is never ours. We hold it to hand back to Him, managed faithfully.
- Weighed twice. Into the priests' hands at the start, out of them at the end — so integrity was proved, not assumed.
- Audited. Ezra did not check his own delivery. Others received and counted it, and that practice would have spared the church many difficulties.
- Written. They wrote the totals down on the spot. There will likewise be a lasting record of all done in true devotion to the Lord.
- Accounted for. The reckoning took place inside God's house. In the same way, every believer must one day give an account before the judgment seat of Christ.
the whole by number and by weight; and all the weight was written down at that time.
Ezra's company has just finished a four-month journey from Babylon, carrying a fortune in silver, gold and temple vessels. On the fourth day after arriving they hand it all over in the house of God, and this verse is the receipt — so why does such careful bookkeeping belong in Scripture?
The handover happened in the right place and into the right hands. One writer counts the written record itself as part of their faithfulness:
Their journey went well. Three days after arriving, they handed the offering over by number and weight in God's house, into the right hands, and it was recorded properly at the time. So they acknowledged God according to His word, in a way they could not have done in Babylon.
Ezra weighed the treasure out before the journey. He required it weighed again on arrival. Commentators are careful to say what this double weighing did not mean:
Ezra had weighed 650 talents of silver and 100 talents of gold into their hands, besides the costly vessels of silver and gold. They weighed everything carefully when they received these treasures, and weighed it again when they delivered it in Jerusalem. This does not mean Ezra had any doubt about the honesty of the priests and Levites. The aim was to avoid all suspicion. The New Testament lays down the same principle for the Church: "We aim at what is honourable not only in the Lord's sight but also in the sight of man" (2 Cor. 8:21).
The people may well have trusted both Ezra and the priests. The weighing existed so that no one could suggest otherwise:
Ezra wanted to remove every opening for the enemy's work. So he had the vessels, the silver and the gold weighed when they went into the priests' hands, and weighed again when the priests delivered them. In this way he proved that he and they were trustworthy. And surely this is a godly, scriptural example for anyone who has any charge of the offerings of the Lord's people. Such people should be careful to give an account of their stewardship, and not wait to be pressed for it.
Notice who did the weighing at Jerusalem — not the man who had brought the treasure. The same writer sees what this practice would have spared the Church:
Many a difficulty in the Church of God might have been avoided if people had followed this practice. Note too that when they reached Jerusalem, others did the weighing, not Ezra, and "the weight of everything was recorded" (vv. 33, 34). In plain terms, someone checked and audited Ezra's accounts, and they did it on the fourth day after their journey ended.
The figures matched: everything sent from Babylon arrived. One writer turns that into a prayer for us:
Finally, Ezra entrusts the silver and gold, the vessels for the house of God, to twelve of the chief priests. He tells them to look after these treasures, and they do so faithfully. Everything is weighed and numbered. And, good to see, when they arrive everything is accounted for; nothing has gone missing. May it be so with the things the Lord entrusted to us, whether material or otherwise (1 Tim. 6:20).
The written total points forward. Another writer reads this scene as a picture of a review at the end of our journey:
On the fourth day after they arrived at Jerusalem, two priests and three Levites weighed the silver, the gold and all the articles in the house of God. How right this was, so that everything might be found in proper order. In the same way, at the end of our Christian journey, all our life will be weighed in "the balances of the sanctuary." Do we train ourselves to have "a clear conscience toward God and man," so that we shall gladly welcome that review? Notice that all the weight was written down at the time (v. 34). So there will indeed be an eternal record of what has been done in true devotion to the Lord.
The chief receiver named in verse 33 appears again later in the Bible's story, and his history suggests what handling a trust well leads to:
We see first of all Meremoth the son of Urijah the priest, a faithful and respected man, to whom Ezra's companions had entrusted all the free-will offerings sent from Babylon to Jerusalem (Ezra 8:33-34). His zeal goes beyond the restoration of just one portion of the wall... Faithfulness shown in a service of modest appearance qualifies the labourer for an activity which relates directly to Christ, our high priest.
- Weighed out. Ezra weighed the silver, the gold and the vessels before they left Babylon, so the trust was clear from the start.
- Weighed in. Others weighed it again on arrival, not Ezra — in plain terms, they checked and audited his accounts.
- Weighed openly. The point was not that Ezra suspected the priests. It was to remove every occasion for suspicion: honourable in the Lord's sight and in the sight of man.
- Weighed in full. Nothing went missing. May it be so with whatever the Lord has entrusted to us, material or otherwise.
- Weighed at the end. The totals were written down that day. A life will be weighed in the same way, and there will be an eternal record of what was done in true devotion to the Lord.
The children of those that had been carried away, who had come out of the captivity, presented burnt-offerings to the God of Israel, twelve bullocks for all Israel, ninety-six rams, seventy-seven lambs, twelve he-goats for a sin-offering all for a burnt-offering to Jehovah.
Ezra's company has just reached Jerusalem after the journey out of captivity. Their first recorded act is sacrifice. The numbers are strange for so small a group: twelve bulls and twelve male goats, when only a fraction of Israel had returned. That oddity is where commentators find the heart of the verse.
Safe arrival is exactly the moment when gratitude tends to fade. Here it does not, and one writer reads the offering as the proof that these returned exiles held two things together at once:
This feeble group takes to heart the recognition and affirmation that the people of Israel are one. This very principle was the ground of their testimony, even in their low condition. But note this: they came to see the principle only while humbled about themselves, and with care to keep the holiness of the Lord beyond any reproach. To proclaim principles without a life that matches them is nothing less than profaning them.
The arithmetic is deliberate. A small band of returned families offers for all twelve tribes. Edward Dennett treats their refusal to shrink the ground as a pattern for today:
It is touching to see this feeble remnant embrace the whole of Israel in their faith. The same thing happened at the dedication of the house of God (Ezra 6:17). They were few in number. But they could accept no ground narrower than that of the twelve tribes, and the number of their offerings testified to it. It is the same now, or should be so, with those gathered out to the name of the Lord Jesus Christ on the ground of the one body. They too may be few, feeble, and poor. But if they understand at all the rich place God has brought them into, they will refuse any ground narrower than all the members of the one body.
Faith on this scale could tip into make-believe, as though the nation were whole again. Another writer describes the balance they kept:
They rose in faith to God's mind, and before Him they embraced all His people in their hearts. They were as far as possible from pretending to be more than they were. Yet they refused to be other than they were. They fully owned their original relationship to the Lord, now so dishonoured. They looked with confidence to their glorious restoration, for the sake of His own name... They acknowledged the present ruin of Israel, but clung unwaveringly to Israel's God.
The list divides in two. Some numbers match the tribes; others do not:
Notice that there were two kinds of sacrifices — burnt offerings and sin offerings. From the numbers, it seems that the twelve male goats, like the twelve bulls, were for all Israel. The other offerings were individual. They were the spontaneous expression of grateful hearts for the mercy of the Lord in bringing them safely to Jerusalem and to His house.
The verse closes by calling the whole thing a burnt offering, and that word carries a specific picture:
The whole of the burnt offering went up to the Lord. It made no difference which animal was offered — a sheep, a goat, or a bull. The whole body went on the altar, fire consumed it, and it rose as smoke to heaven. In picture, it was to God a sweet-smelling savour of Christ in His complete devotion to God's will, even as far as death on the cross.
Their faith also reached forward in time:
"All Israel" will some day be saved and brought back to the land, through Him who is the true burnt and sin offering. Their faith included all their brothers, the whole house of Israel, though those brothers were not with them. So our faith must include all the saints of God.
Only in the next verse do they hand the king's papers to the regional governors. One writer sees that order as deliberate:
They first placed themselves under the favour of God through their offerings, and then they turned to the king's officers. They gave their God their first thoughts and the first place. By this they owned that everything depended on Him. He answered His people's confidence. He touched the hearts of the officials and governors, and inclined them to favour His people and their purpose.
- Arrive, then worship. They reached Jerusalem safely. Their first act was sacrifice, not a celebration of their own success.
- All twelve. A small remnant counted out offerings for all twelve tribes. They refused any ground narrower than the whole people of God.
- Honest about ruin. Twelve male goats were a sin offering for all Israel. They owned the nation's ruin and still clung to Israel's God.
- Wholly God's. The whole burnt offering went up to Him — a picture of Christ's complete devotion to God's will, as far as death on the cross.
- God first, governors after. They came under the offerings first, then went to the king's officials. God opened those officials' hearts.
And they delivered the king's edicts to the king's satraps, and to the governors on this side the river. And they furthered the people and the house of God.
Ezra's company had just reached Jerusalem, weighed out the treasure, and offered their sacrifices. Only now do they hand the Persian king's written orders to the local officials. Two questions follow: why do the orders come last, and why does a restored people need a foreign king's permission at all?
Worship came first. Only then did Ezra's company turn to the officials. One writer reads that order as a confession of where their confidence rested.
They had put themselves under the value of the sacrifices. They had set their relationship with God on the only possible ground. Then they went on to deliver the king's orders to his officials and to the governors of the province, and these men helped the people and the house of God. This order is as instructive as it is beautiful. They first placed themselves under God's favour through their offerings. Then they turned to the king's officers. They gave their God their first thoughts and the first place. In doing so they acknowledged that everything depended on Him. He answered His people's confidence by touching the hearts of the officials and governors. He made them willing to favour His people and the goal they had in view.
The letters Ezra carried still needed men willing to act on them. One writer traces that willingness back to God.
Ezra's company delivered the king's orders to his officials in that area, and the officials honoured them by giving support to the Jews and to the work of the temple (v. 36). God in this way was giving special encouragement to His people in the work that was for His honour.
Why did the people need a foreign king's letters at all? One writer points to a settled principle: God Himself had set up the Gentile throne, and He would not bypass it.
God, in His goodness, must still watch over the unfaithfulness and the failures of His people, even when they are only a small remnant who by His grace have escaped from the ruin. He puts it into the heart of Ezra, a skilled scribe in the law of Moses, to think of the remnant in Jerusalem, to seek the law of the LORD, to teach it and have it kept. Here again it is still the Gentile king who sends him to Jerusalem for this purpose. All blessing is of God, but apart from prophecy nothing in the way of authority comes directly from God. He could not pass by unrecognised the throne which He had Himself established among the Gentiles upon the earth. And Israel was an earthly people.
The same arrangement points in two directions at once.
Ezra the priest went up from Babylon, and with him other Israelites of every rank. They went by the king's favour, with free-will offerings, and with authority for all Ezra wanted for the house of his God, and for teaching and judging the Jews. It was a witness both to God's mercy through the Gentile, and to the abnormal position of Israel.
Notice what this mission did not bring back.
The way God stepped in through Ezra's mission is, I think, a touching proof of His loving-kindness. It fitted the needs of the people exactly. It was not power. Power had passed to another place. It was the knowledge of the will and the ordinances of God — of the mind of God in the word. The king himself recognised this. Guarded by the good hand of his God, this devoted man goes up with many others to Jerusalem.
The work moved forward through men Ezra could not command.
How blessed it is to be wholly dependent on God, and to look to Him alone to further His cause!
- Order first. Sacrifices came before the king's letters. The people gave God their first thoughts, and so confessed that everything depended on Him.
- God answers. He touched the hearts of the officials and made them willing to favour His people and their goal.
- Help follows. The officials honoured the orders and supported both the people and the temple work. God was encouraging work done for His honour.
- Mercy inside a humbling. The king's favour and funds show God's mercy through the Gentile. They also show Israel's abnormal position: authority no longer came to them directly.
- Not power, but the word. God did not send back power through Ezra. He sent the knowledge of His will and mind in the word, exactly fitted to the people's need.
Now when these things were completed, the princes came to me, saying, The people of Israel, and the priests and the Levites, have not separated themselves from the peoples of the lands, according to their abominations, [even] of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Jebusites, the Ammonites, the Moabites, the Egyptians, and the Amorites;
Ezra has just arrived in Jerusalem with a fresh company of exiles. The officials meet him with bad news. The people who came back have not kept themselves apart from the nations around them, and they have copied their evil practices. Even the priests are involved. How could a rescued people slide so far so fast?
The sin was not new; the arrival of Ezra's company simply brought it into the light.
But the arrival of this new reinforcement will show the state of the people who had earlier rebuilt the temple of the Lord. It is what brings to light the hidden evil that eats away at the people and holds back their spiritual growth... The surrounding world had invaded the assembly of Israel little by little. If they were not all contaminated, they were in great danger of it, because their leaders had been the first to make unholy alliances.
The failure did not belong to people far from Jerusalem. It sat at the centre, among the priests themselves.
So it was here. It was not in Babylon, but in Judea, that they were behaving like the Canaanites. It was not the people far away from Jerusalem. It was the people and the priests here who had slipped away from the will of the Lord... You will find the very worst forms of evil where you are closest to the Lord, if you are not walking with Him — if He is not keeping you. Satan aims his greatest effort against that.
The charge has two halves. They did not stay separate, and they copied what the nations did. The law had already forbidden both.
Not only had they intermarried, but they were also copying their abominations. In doing this they chose to break the command of the Lord as given in Exodus 34:12-16. God's people were to be holy, a separated people... It was an alliance with the world. God demanded separation of Israel; He demands the same of His people in the New Testament... That God's people could sink so low shows what the heart of man is. It equally shows His infinite patience and long-suffering, bearing with them instead of judging them at once.
These marriages were more than a broken rule. They stand for friendship with the world, and the New Testament warns against that in strong terms.
These marriages are a picture of alliances with the world — the besetting sin of God's people in every age. The apostle James says, "You adulterous people! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God?" and the apostle Paul cries, "Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness?" For if the Lord was pleased to say that He was married to Israel, believers now are said to be married to Christ.
The catalogue of nations in the verse is not padding. It measures the spread of the corruption.
Such is man! Rather — such are the people of God when they follow the inclination of their own hearts instead of walking in obedience to His word! In the case before us it was not only the abominations of the Canaanites, the earlier people of the land. It was also those of the Ammonites, the Moabites, the Egyptians, and the Amorites — that is, every possible form of corruption.
Breaking this command was not a small slip. It struck at the Lord's own rights over Israel.
What evil could be more deadly for a Jew, unless it were worshipping other gods? And it always tended that way. In itself it broke the Lord's will at the root. It gave up the separateness to Himself from the nations, and that separateness was essential to their standing as His people. They did not only throw away their privilege as the one nation of His choice. They rebelled against the rights and glory of the God who had so favoured them.
The first move is not action but humbling yourself — and one person alone can begin.
The first thing, then, is individual humiliation. It comes while we wait for the people as a whole to recognise their fault and humble themselves. This must always be so. When the sin of the people of God comes to light, we are not called first of all to take action. We are called to humble ourselves. Even if we stand alone... let us not fail to take this attitude before God. He looks on the heart that is humbled and broken, and He answers its cry.
- Report — The officials' news did not create the evil. Ezra's arrival brought a hidden growth into the open.
- Ruin — The evil was in Jerusalem, not Babylon, among the people and the priests themselves.
- Root — They broke a written command on purpose. That was rebellion against the God who had chosen them.
- Reach — Leaders led the way, and the sin spread until it covered every form of corruption around them.
- Response — Humbling comes before action. God is patient with His people, and He answers a broken heart, even one heart alone.
for they have taken of their daughters for themselves and for their sons, and have mingled the holy seed with the peoples of the lands; and the hand of the princes and rulers has been chief in this unfaithfulness.
Ezra came to Jerusalem to teach God's law, and bad news met him at once. The returned exiles — priests, Levites and rulers among them — had married into the surrounding nations, and the leaders had led the way.
The ESV calls them a holy race; older translations read holy seed. One writer builds on that word: it marks them out as God's by birth, and it brings an obligation with it.
There is a reason for the introduction in this place of the word seed. It is to point out that they were a holy people, separated to God. They were born of His people Israel, whom He had redeemed to Himself on the ground of the blood of the Passover Lamb. They were therefore a "holy seed" (Ezra 9:2; compare 1 John 3:9), and as such were to maintain their holy character... No doubt this was narrowness in man's eyes, and it was sure to bring on them the charge of being unloving. But what did that matter, as long as they were acting according to God? If God sets the feet of His people in a narrow path, it is their part to keep in it if they would be in the path of blessing.
Their whole standing rested on belonging to God alone. Marrying into the nations struck at His claim on them.
What evil more deadly for a Jew, unless it were worshipping other gods? And to this it habitually tended. In itself it was a basic violation of Jehovah's will. It gave up that separateness to Himself from the nations, which was essential to their standing as His people. They not only surrendered their own privilege as the one nation of His choice. They rebelled against the rights and glory of God, Who had so favoured them.
Commentators read these marriages as a picture of something that outlives Israel's history.
It was therefore in wilful disobedience that they had contracted these shameful alliances with the world; for this is what these marriages typify — the besetting sin of God's people in every age. The apostle James says, "Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God?" (James 4:4); and the apostle Paul cries, "Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers... What accord has Christ with Belial?" (2 Cor. 6:14-15.)
Commentators differ on how wide Paul's words reach. One reads them of every alliance with the world; another draws a line.
2 Cor. 6:14, "Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers," is often applied to marriage with unbelievers. But this is an error, though marriage ought to be "only in the Lord," as 1 Cor. 7 urges. The subject is the ministry or service of Christ.
The verse ends by tracing the trail back to those at the top, and that detail changes the weight of the sin.
It would seem then that the princes and rulers had first set the example, and that the others had only been too ready to follow. "One sinner destroys much good," especially when that one has a place of position and influence. When a standard-bearer faints in the day of battle, the soldiers are often discouraged and quickly defeated. In the same way, once Satan has trapped a leader among God's people, he often finds it easy work to ensnare many who are less prominent.
The same pattern shows up wherever God revives His people. The world does not storm in; it seeps in.
The surrounding world had crept into the assembly of Israel. Even if they were not all contaminated, they were in great danger of it, for their leaders had been the first to make profane alliances. It is a sad thing to note that all revivals are ruined one after another by alliance with the world.
When Ezra hears the report he does not organise a reform. He tears his clothes and sits down.
The first thing, then, is individual humiliation, while waiting for the people to recognise their fault and humble themselves in a general way. This must always be so. When the sin of the people of God comes to light, our first call is not to take action, but to humble ourselves. Even if we stand alone, let us not fail to take this attitude before God. He looks on the heart that is humbled and broken and He answers its cry.
One writer turns the verse on his readers.
"And in this faithlessness the hand of the officials and chief men has been foremost." And do you suppose that we are clear from such dangers? Not at all... all true blessing for us must begin with individual blessing, and individual blessing always has its root in self-judgment before God.
- Seed — the word marks a people born into redemption and bound to keep the holy character that came with it.
- Separateness — mixing gave up the one thing their standing rested on. It also rebelled against the God who had chosen them.
- Slippage — the world crept in; it did not attack. Commentators note that this ruins one revival after another.
- Standard-bearers — the leaders went first. One sinner with influence destroys much good, because others copy the example.
- Self-judgment — Ezra began with humiliation before God, not with a reform programme. All blessing starts there.
And when I heard this thing, I rent my mantle and my garment, and plucked off the hair of my head and of my beard, and sat down overwhelmed.
News reached Ezra soon after he arrived in Jerusalem: God's people had mixed themselves with the nations around them. He did not call a meeting or issue a rebuke. He tore his clothes and sat in silence.
Each act was a known sign of grief, used elsewhere in Scripture. But Ezra's grief reached past the people to God Himself.
Horror seized him. Tearing his garments was how he showed his anger and grief (Genesis 37:29; Leviticus 10:6; Judges 11:35; Esther 4:1). The pulling out of the hair is also a sign of sorrow (Job 1:20; Ezekiel 7:18). But how his heart must have felt the dishonour done to Jehovah's holy Name! How deeply the sins of the people affected him!
Grief over a scandal is common. Grief over what it does to God's name is rarer, and it reaches its perfect example in Christ.
It is easier to feel for God's people when their sinful conduct shames them in the eyes of the world. Only some can measure their sin as it affects the holy Name by which they are called. Only they can go down, take up and make the sin their own, and tell it all out before God. These are the people who, by the power of the Holy Spirit, are in communion with the mind of God. They share His affections for His own. So they are first and foremost filled with zeal to guard His glory. Moses, Nehemiah and Daniel are examples of this in their own measure, as well as Ezra. But all of them are only faint pictures of Him who joined Himself so closely to His people that He confessed their sins as His own. He said, "O God, you know my folly; the wrongs I have done are not hidden from you." (Psalm 69:5.)
Ezra had no part in this sin. Yet notice who he punished.
Here was a man with no part at all in the evil now uncovered before him. Yet he struck himself, instead of setting out to strike the guilty parties. As the custom was in those days, he tore his clothes. That was not enough for him. He also hurt himself by pulling hair out of his head and beard — a painful process. Having done so, he sat down "appalled", or "overwhelmed". He began with himself in humiliation before God.
This order is a rule for anyone who finds wrong among God's people. It holds even when no one joins you.
The first thing, then, is that one person humbles himself, while he waits for the people to recognize their fault and humble themselves as a whole. This must always be so. When the sin of God's people comes to light, our first call is not to take action. It is to humble ourselves. We may be alone in this, like Daniel and other faithful men of the past, and like Ezra here. Even then, let us not fail to take this place before God. He looks on the heart that is humbled and broken, and He answers its cry.
There are degrees of humbling, and Ezra took the deeper one. Notice where it ended.
And so you see, Ezra takes a place of deeper humiliation than that. It was not just a fast now. There is this sign of a deeper humbling: he tears his garments, he sits appalled right up to the evening sacrifice, and only then does he spread out his hands to the Lord — to pray for his people as well as to confess.
Sitting stunned was not the end. Ezra waited for one hour of the day, and then he prayed as one of the guilty.
Ezra is devastated. He tears his garments, pulls out his hair and sits down "overwhelmed". Only at the time of the evening sacrifice does Ezra find the courage to turn to God. That hour reminds us of the value of the sacrifice of Christ, and that God sees His people in Him. He turns to God not to accuse others, but to confess failure. And in this confession it is always "we" have sinned, not "they".
- Heard — A report came of God's people mixing with the nations around them. Ezra's first response was horror, not a plan.
- Torn — The torn robe and pulled-out hair were the accepted signs of grief and anger. Ezra aimed the pain at himself, not at the guilty.
- Felt — What made the sorrow so deep was the dishonour to God's holy name, felt by a man in communion with God's own mind.
- Humbled — Humbling yourself comes before acting. It holds even if you stand alone, and God answers the broken heart.
- Confessed — At the evening sacrifice he rose and prayed — saying "we have sinned", never "they".
Then were assembled to me every one that trembled at the words of the God of Israel, because of the unfaithfulness of those that had been carried away; and I sat overwhelmed until the evening oblation.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And at the evening oblation I arose up from my humiliation; and with my mantle and my garment rent, I fell on my knees, and spread out my hands to Jehovah my God,
Ezra has just heard that the returned exiles have intermarried with the surrounding nations. He tore his clothes and sat stunned. Verse 5 is the moment he moves. The timing of that move, at the evening sacrifice, is the key to the whole scene.
Ezra did not pray the moment he heard the news. He waited in the dust until one particular hour. That delay was faith: he needed a ground on which to come to God about sin at all.
Ezra kept his place in the dust — crushed by his unspeakable sorrow — until the evening sacrifice. If on one side he was heartbroken over the people's sin, on the other he saw, by faith, the only ground of approach to God about it. He took hold of the power of the sacrifice. It was the foundation on which he could come before God and spread out before Him the wrongdoing of the children of Israel. The evening sacrifice was a burnt offering. The altar consumed all of it, and it went up as a pleasing aroma to the Lord. Once Ezra stood before Him in the value of this — in all the value of what Christ was to God in His death, pictured in advance — his intercession was certain to succeed.
Ezra's first response to the failure of God's people was not a plan of action. It was self-humbling — and writers take that order as the pattern for us.
When the sin of the people of God comes to light, we are not called first of all to take action. We are called to humble ourselves. Even if we should be alone — like Daniel and other faithful men of former days, and like Ezra here — let us not fail to take this attitude before God. He looks on the heart that is humbled and broken, and He answers its cry.
What follows in verses 6–15 is unusual. Ezra asks God for nothing, and the sins he pours out were not his own doing.
The evening sacrifice was a small picture of the sacrifice of Christ. At that hour Ezra got up with his torn garments and fell on his knees to approach God. The prayer that follows, in verses 6-15, is remarkable. He asks for nothing in it. From beginning to end it is humble and heartbroken confession of sins that he had not shared in.
Ezra rises, kneels, and begins to speak. He does not stand apart from the guilty as their judge.
Only at the time of the evening sacrifice does Ezra find the courage to turn to God. That hour reminds us of the value of the sacrifice of Christ, and that God sees His people in Him. He does not accuse others; he confesses failure. And in this confession it is always "we" have sinned, not "they".
Ezra could take the guilt of others as his own because he shared God's own feelings about His people. Writers see in that a faint outline of Someone else.
It is easy enough to feel for God's people when their sinful conduct dishonours them in the eyes of the world. It is another thing to weigh their sin as it touches the holy Name by which they are called. Only those in communion with the mind of God by the power of the Holy Spirit can do that — those who share His affections for His own, those who are first and foremost filled with zeal for the keeping of His glory. Only they can go down, take up and make the sin their own, and tell it all out before God. Moses, Nehemiah and Daniel are examples of this in their various measures, and so is Ezra. But all of them are only faint foreshadowings of Him who so identified Himself with His people that in confessing their sins He said, "O God, you know my folly; the wrongs I have done are not hidden from you." (Ps. 69:5.)
The verse records his body as carefully as his words. That detail is not filler.
Kneeling in prayer is a physical action that shows recognition of the supremacy and greatness of the eternal God. And we have good examples — above all the Lord Jesus Christ Himself, as we see Him kneeling in the garden of Gethsemane. Bowed down with the weight of the approaching cross and all it meant, He knelt and He prayed (Luke 22:41). Paul (Acts 20:36), Solomon (2 Chr. 6:13), Ezra (Ezra 9:5) and many others bowed their knees in the presence of God or of Christ.
- Sat — his first move against sin among God's people was not a plan but grief and self-humbling, even if he stood alone.
- Waited — he stayed in the dust until the hour of the burnt offering. Sin comes to God only on the ground of a sacrifice.
- Rose — he stood in the value of that offering, which pictures what Christ was to God in His death. So his prayer was sure to be heard.
- Knelt — the verse records the bent knee and open hands on purpose. Posture shows the reverence the heart owes to God.
- Owned — his prayer asked for nothing. It was all confession, and always "we": sins he had not committed, owned as his own.
and said O my God, I am ashamed and blush to lift up my face to thee, my God; for our iniquities are increased over [our] head, and our trespass is grown up to the heavens.
The people who came back from exile have married into the surrounding nations, and the priests and leaders led the way. Ezra sat stunned until the evening sacrifice, then prayed — not asking for anything, but in shame, saying "our" for a sin that was not his.
Ezra was not one of the offenders. Yet he refuses to stand apart from them. One writer sees in that refusal the very thing that made him fit to plead for the nation.
He does not separate himself, even in spirit, from those who had sinned. He and they — indeed, all the people — are one before God, counted together as one people. God Himself saw it this way. When Achan sinned, He said to Joshua, "Israel has sinned." Ezra understood this, and that is what qualified him to become an intercessor for the people with God. Unless we grasp our oneness with God's people — that their sin and sorrow are our sin and sorrow — we cannot truly carry them on our hearts before the Lord in their time of need.
A faithful man can meet failure another way: by telling God it is someone else's fault. Commentators contrast Ezra with Elijah, who told God how unfaithful Israel had been while he alone stayed true.
Instead of this, Ezra prayed as though he was just as guilty as the rest of Israel in this sad mixing of the Jews with the nations. He confessed the sin of all as though it had been his own, though he was not personally involved in it. He saw this: Israel had sinned, and he was part of Israel. As God's priest, he was eating the sin offering (Lev. 6:25-26). That means feeling before God how serious Israel's sin was, and the priest was to count himself involved in it.
The same writer sees this most clearly in words the Lord Jesus speaks in Psalm 69:5.
"O God, you know my folly; the wrongs I have done are not hidden from you." The Lord Jesus certainly had no sins of His own. But He took the responsibility on His own shoulders for the sins of Israel, confessed them before God, and in fact bore them "in His own body on the tree" (1 Peter 2:24).
The verse gives two measurements: sin risen higher than the head, guilt piled as high as the sky. One writer reads them as showing how far the trouble had gone, and how long it had run.
Their sin was far beyond their control or their ability to check it. But he does not limit his thoughts to the guilt of that moment. He confesses that it had been there "since the days of our fathers" (v. 7). Speaking this way, he remembered that such guilt had led to their captivity. Their kings and priests were handed over to foreign kings because of it, and brought down to shameful humiliation.
Ezra says he is too ashamed to raise his face, and in the same breath calls God "my God" twice. One writer pictures a person weeping over sin, dreading to look at the God he had wronged.
The truth he had not grasped was that God, to whom he was answerable as a sinner, was ready to pardon. A divine invitation went out to him and to every other guilty person: "Turn to me and be saved, all the ends of the earth! For I am God, and there is no other" (Isa. 45:22). Ezra the priest confessed his own sin and the sins of his people. He acted on this invitation and lifted up his eyes to God despite his sense of guilt.
Ezra could have answered the crisis with a plan. He answered it with feeling instead.
Ezra called together no committee; he laid no elaborate plans for reforming this abuse; he just FELT things before God, and as they affected God. He felt things so much that he tore his clothes, pulled out his hair, and sat down astonished. Then, realising the full extent of it all, he fell on his knees and began a memorable prayer of confession: "O my God, I am ashamed and blush to lift my face to you, my God."
- Ours. Ezra does not separate himself from the offenders, even in spirit. Before God the people are one, as when God said of Achan's sin, "Israel has sinned."
- Not theirs. Elijah reported Israel's unfaithfulness and his own loyalty. Ezra prays as though the guilt were all his own — the priest eating the sin offering.
- Higher. Sin had risen past the head, and guilt to the heavens. It was past their power to control, and it reached back to the days of their fathers.
- Upward. Too ashamed to raise his face, he raises it anyway, acting on the invitation of a God ready to pardon.
- Deeper. No committee, no reform plan — he felt the failure as God felt it, and that is where his power to help his people began.
Since the days of our fathers, we have been in great trespass to this day; and for our iniquities we, our kings, our priests, have been given into the hand of the kings of the lands, to the sword, and to captivity, and to spoil, and to confusion of face, as it is this day.
Ezra prays this after learning that the returned exiles had married into the surrounding nations. Two questions press on the verse: why confess sins he did not commit, and why say the shame is still going on "as it is today"?
Ezra does not stand apart from the offenders and report on them. His words put him inside the guilt, and that is what fits a man to pray for others.
Notice, first, how completely he takes the place of the people before God... Not even in spirit does he separate himself from those who had sinned; he and they — indeed, all the people — are one, corporately one before God. God Himself saw it the same way. When one man, Achan, sinned, He said to Joshua, "Israel has sinned." Ezra understood this, and so was qualified to become an intercessor for the people with God. Unless we grasp our oneness with God's people — that their sin and sorrow are our sin and sorrow — we cannot truly carry them on our hearts before the Lord in their time of need.
One writer draws a general rule from Ezra's example.
Ezra was a man of prayer... His prayer held confession that was thorough and held nothing back. In a day of ruin, when we look at the state of God's people, there can be no true prayer without true confession. And true confession is not saying, "They have sinned," but, "We have sinned."
The verse reaches backwards. Ezra does not treat this failure as a one-off, and he ties the old guilt to the captivity itself.
He does not limit his thoughts to the guilt of that moment. He confesses it had been there "from the days of our fathers" (v. 7). He remembered that this same guilt had led to their captivity. It put their kings and priests into the hands of foreign kings, and brought them down to shameful humiliation.
The list of sorrows in the verse — sword, captivity, plundering, shame — is not a complaint. Ezra names each one as the just outcome of the nation's sin. That leaves God in the right.
Having taken their place in this way, Ezra confessed that nothing but sin had marked them from the days of their fathers. All God's judicial dealings with them had been because of their iniquities. He had delivered them "into the hand of the kings of the lands, to the sword, to captivity, to plundering, and to utter shame, as it is today." He justified God in all His past dealings with His people... He hides nothing and makes no excuses, but spreads it all out before God.
Bowing this low is never wasted.
He confessed the sins of the people and owned it all in God's presence. This kind of humbling and confession always pleases God, for "God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble."
The phrase refuses to file the trouble away as past. The people were back in their own land, yet still ruled by foreign nations.
Even outwardly, apart from the question of the soul, the Jews had long been in servitude to the Gentiles. So Ezra confessed at the evening sacrifice... Nehemiah said the same: "Behold, we are slaves this day; in the land that You gave to our fathers to enjoy its fruit and its good gifts, behold, we are slaves."
The prayer did not end in despair. Confession led to hope, and hope to action.
No prophet answers, as had so often happened before in situations like this. But God answers in the hearts of the guilty. "We have sinned," said one among them, "but even now there is hope for Israel in spite of this." And they set to work with all their heart.
- Own it — Ezra says "we," not "they." He does not separate himself even in spirit from those who sinned, and that is what qualified him to pray for them.
- Trace it — the guilt did not start with this week's failure. It ran back to the days of the fathers, and it had already led to the captivity.
- Clear God — Ezra owns every judgment listed — sword, captivity, plundering, shame — as deserved. God is right in all His past dealings.
- Feel it still — "as it is today" admits the trouble has not lifted. They are back in the land, yet still under foreign kings.
- Then act — confession like this is not the end. Out of it came the words "even now there is hope for Israel," and wholehearted work followed.
And now for a little space there hath been favour from Jehovah our God, to leave us a remnant to escape, and to give us a nail in his holy place, that our God may lighten our eyes, and give us a little reviving in our bondage.
Ezra prays this right after owning his people's sin, and the first thing he does next is count the mercies. The verse holds two things together: a people still in slavery, and a people given a firm place, brightened eyes, and a small revival.
Ezra recites God's kindness for a reason.
He has owned the sins of his brothers, and has declared God right in His ways with His people. Next he magnifies the grace that had visited them in their low state. That grace had brought them back to the land — only a remnant — and had allowed them once again to set up the house of their God. But why does he recite this proof of the Lord's grace and mercy? It was to show the character of His people's sin.
Where the ESV reads "a secure hold," older versions read "a nail." One writer reads it as God Himself fixing them in place.
The remnant through His mercy had escaped, and God had given them "a nail in His holy place" (Isaiah 22:23). Like a nail in the wall, fixed and immovable, so God had established them in Jerusalem.
Another writer reads the word differently.
The word "nail" is really "tent peg." It is a small item that looks unimportant, in a place almost out of sight. Yet how vital it is to the safety of the structure!
Either way the point stands: what God gave them was small, but it held.
The exiles were back in the land. But no king ruled again in Jerusalem, and a foreign empire still held them. God blessed them inside that situation.
The authority and the throne at Jerusalem, with the power to appoint that went with them, were not set up again. God gave no public seal of approval. Still, God blessed the remnant of His people when they were faithful. And the main thing, the thing that should stay on our hearts, is the grace that could still bless His people — grace in the middle of such ruin, and while the throne of a foreign power stood, set up because of Israel's sin.
Ezra is not describing a slavery he has escaped. One writer notes that the next verse is better read in the present tense.
Ezra deeply appreciated the great kindness of God in the small measure of recovery He had given His people, though only a remnant. He had given them "a peg" in His holy place, a small support on which to hang their confidence. The peg was to give them enlightened eyes to see the truth of God more clearly, and some measure of reviving, though they were still in bondage. Verse 9 is rightly translated, "we are slaves." Even so, God had not forsaken them in their bondage. He had extended mercy to them in the sight of the kings of Persia. His aim was that they might at least rise in spirit above their circumstances, and have the temple of God repaired and the wall of Jerusalem rebuilt. Does this not show us that even in a sadly confined state God is able to provide grace to worship Him rightly? The temple speaks of that worship. He also gives grace to be in some true measure separate from the world, which the wall pictures.
So the reviving comes to people who are still slaves.
Ezra asks only for "a little reviving." Small numbers were nothing new for his people.
Israel began as "the fewest of all peoples" (Deut. 7:7)... In the days of the exile, God raised the spirits of some (Ezra 1:5), but the revival was very limited in scope.
One writer sees Ezra's conditions in his own day.
How our hearts long to see affections stirred in loyalty and devotion to Christ and to the truth of His Word! We do not look for spectacular movements of outward greatness. We want our prayers to mingle with Ezra's, "that our God may brighten our eyes and grant us a little reviving" (Ezra 9:8). Conditions in Ezra's day were like ours in a moral sense. God's throne was no longer set up in Jerusalem. His rights were disowned, His people scattered and in captivity.
- Little. Ezra names the mercy for what it is: a remnant, a peg, a little reviving — not a full restoration.
- Fixed. The "nail" is a peg: fixed in a wall, or hidden in a tent. Either way, what God gives holds.
- Inside. The reviving comes while they are still slaves. God gives grace before He mends the ruin.
- Enough. Even in a confined state, God supplies grace for real worship (the temple) and real separation from the world (the wall).
- Convicting. Ezra recites the mercy to expose the sin. The greater the grace, the darker the sin against it.
For we are bondmen; yet our God hath not forsaken us in our bondage, but hath extended mercy unto us before the kings of Persia, to give us a reviving, to set up the house of our God and to repair the ruins thereof, and to give us a wall in Judah and in Jerusalem.
Ezra prays this after learning that the returned exiles had married into the surrounding nations. Instead of pleading their good record, he says plainly where they stand: still slaves because of sin, yet still receiving God's mercy.
The force of the verse turns on one small word. Some older English versions read "we were bondmen." Commentators say the sense is present: Ezra describes the day he lives in, not a chapter he has closed.
"For," he said, "we are slaves" (verse 9). The context, and even the verse itself, requires this — not "were," as some versions have it. People are quick to read it that way, forgetting God's ways and His people's sin. Not for a moment did he think the Jews of that day could do all that Moses or Joshua, David or Solomon, did in their days. He sought to do all that God's word authorised them to do in their actual circumstances. The all-important condition is a right sense of where God's people are, and a heart humbly set on obedience. It is not our own ideas and self-confidence trying to put everything right.
Persia's rule over them was not an accident of politics. Their own sin had put them there, and they were meant to keep that fact in view.
They were subjected to the nations because of their sins. They were to stay aware of their state until the glorious restoration of the people through the promised Messiah. … This is what irritated the proud spirit of the people in the days of Jesus. It made them dare to say to Him: "we have never been enslaved to anyone!" (John 8:33). The consciousness of our ruin should mark us today, as it marked the people in the days of Ezra. We cannot and should not deny it or shrug the burden off our shoulders.
God did not first remove the foreign empire that ruled them and then bless. He blessed them under it — and that, one writer says, is the thing to hold on to in the whole scene.
Still, God blessed the remnant of His people when they were faithful. The most prominent thing, the thing that should stay on our hearts, is His grace. In the middle of such ruin, and with the Gentile throne set up through Israel's sin, that grace could still bless His people — even though they acknowledged that throne, which God had established in judgment on them. Their position is clearly and touchingly stated in Ezra 9:8-9.
The mercy has two aims in the verse: the house of God repaired, and protection for Judah and Jerusalem. Older versions read that protection as "a wall." One writer takes both the house and the wall as pictures of what God still gives a small, limited people.
Verse 9 is rightly translated, "we are slaves." Despite this, God had not forsaken them in their bondage. He had extended mercy in the sight of the kings of Persia, so that He might at least lift them in spirit above their circumstances, to have the temple of God repaired and the wall of Jerusalem rebuilt. Does this not show us that even in a sadly confined state, God can give grace to worship Him rightly? That is what the temple speaks of. He can also give grace to be separate from the world in some true measure. That is what the wall pictures.
Ezra is not comforting himself here. The next verse shows why he brought up the mercy at all.
But why does he recite this proof of the Lord's grace and mercy? It was to show the character of His people's sin. He goes on, "And now, O our God, what shall we say after this? For we have forsaken your commandments." Then he confesses that they had sinned against both light and grace. He conceals nothing and excuses nothing.
The wall in the verse was a gift and a job at once. The years after Ezra show what became of it.
Ezra had foreseen that rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem had to be the next step after building the temple, if the people were to continue in the spirit of the revival (Ezra 9:9). But this had not been the case. Long years passed with no sign of activity or energy. There was nothing except growing affliction and reproach.
- Slaves. The verb is present: they are still in bondage, and Ezra refuses to pretend the past is past.
- Yet. Bondage is not desertion. God's mercy reaches them under the very Persian throne He set over them in judgment.
- Reviving. The gift is not full restoration. It is breathing space — enough to lift their spirits above their circumstances.
- House and wall. The reviving has two aims: worship restored, and a real measure of separation from the world.
- Then what? Ezra recites the mercy to expose sin, not to excuse it. The unbuilt wall shows how fast a reviving can stall.
And now, what shall we say, our God, after this? for we have forsaken thy commandments,
God had just brought a small group of exiles home from Babylon and let them rebuild the temple. In the same breath, Ezra confesses that the people have broken the very commands that set them apart. He asks a question and leaves it unanswered, because sin after such mercy has no defence to offer.
Ezra sets the sin beside the mercy that came just before it. That comparison is the point of his question.
But why does he recite this proof of the Lord's grace and mercy? It was to show the character of His people's sin; for he goes on, "And now, O our God, what shall we say after this? for we have forsaken your commandments;" and then he confesses that they had sinned against both light and grace. He conceals nothing, and excuses nothing, but spreads it all out before God. He owns what would follow if they broke God's commandments again after all this mercy, and joined with these peoples in their abominations. God might well be angry with them until He had destroyed them, so that no remnant would be left.
Ezra quotes the broken commands in the verses that follow. Those who learned Scripture from him had learned something about God first.
Knowing the word of God through Ezra, they have discovered in it the character of God who can in no way associate Himself with impurity. Has He not said, "You shall be holy, for I am holy" (Lev. 11:44)? And so in his prayer Ezra refers to the word of God, which he knows so well: "For we have forsaken your commandments, which you have commanded by your servants the prophets, saying, The land which you go to possess is an unclean land through the filthiness of the peoples of the lands."
Ezra had not married a foreign wife. Yet every pronoun in his prayer includes him.
Ezra was a man of prayer. His prayer held confession, thorough and holding nothing back. In a day of ruin, when we look at the state of God's people, there can be no true prayer without true confession. And true confession is not saying, "They have sinned," but, "We have sinned." "Behold, we are before you in our guilt, for none can stand before you because of this."
Something is missing from this prayer.
At the time of the evening sacrifice, the offering gave a small picture of the sacrifice of Christ. Ezra got up with his torn garments and fell on his knees to come near to God in the remarkable prayer recorded in verses 6-15. In that prayer he made no actual request. From first to last it was humble and heartbroken confession of sins in which he personally had no share.
What he holds back from asking, he leaves with God.
Notice that Ezra does not ask forgiveness for the people, but simply confesses Israel's guilt before the Lord, leaving God to do as He sees fit with them.
Israel's separation from the nations reached into whom its people married. The Christian's position is not the same.
The serious question was mixed marriages. Of two people already married, one had been won to Christ by the gospel and the other had not. In this the grace of Christianity stands in striking contrast to the strictness of Judaism. One of the ways Israel remained a holy people was by refusing to mix with the nations in marriage. Those who married in this way, or took foreign wives, were polluted, and their children were unclean. When they felt and judged the sin, they proved it by offering a ram for the trespass and by putting both away.
The pattern did not end with Israel.
This prayer of Ezra contains a solemn warning for us, so we do well to consider it. God has shown great mercy in the history of Christendom. Since the time of the Reformation revivals have come, but each one has been marked by the same tendency to go back to former evils. It would indeed be good if every true believer today knelt before God with words like Ezra's. Such words spring from convictions and a heart like his.
- Grace given — God left a remnant, revived them, and let them rebuild. That mercy is the measure of the sin.
- Grace forsaken — the broken commands kept Israel from mixing with the nations, for God will not associate Himself with impurity.
- Grace owned — Ezra says "we," not "they." In a day of ruin there is no true prayer without that confession.
- Grace trusted — he makes no request and asks no pardon; he states the guilt and leaves the outcome with God.
- Grace repeated — mercy, then drift back to old evils, is the recurring story. Ezra's words still fit today.
which thou hast commanded by thy servants the prophets, saying, The land, unto which ye go to possess [it], is an unclean land through the filthiness of the peoples of the lands, through their abominations with which they have filled it from one end to another through their uncleanness.
Ezra prays, and the words he uses are God's own — the command about the land his people had entered. That quotation shapes his whole confession: why the land was unclean, how far the command reached, and what a guilty people must do next.
Ezra does not reach for a new standard in the crisis. He reaches for what God had already said.
They knew the word of God through Ezra, and in it they had discovered the character of God. He can in no way link Himself with impurity. Had He not said, "You shall be holy, for I am holy"? And so in his prayer Ezra points back to the word of God, which he knows so well.
The uncleanness here is not dirt. It is the practice of the nations who filled the land. So marrying into them was no small lapse for an Israelite.
In itself this broke the Lord's will at the deepest level. It gave up the separation to Himself, away from the nations, and that separation was essential to their standing as His people. They were not only throwing away their own privilege as the one nation He had chosen. They were rebelling against the rights and glory of the God who had so favoured them.
The command Ezra quotes does not stop at marriage. One writer shows how far it reached, and where the line falls for believers now.
Ezra went on in his prayer to recall that God had warned Israel not to intermarry with the nations of the land. God also warned them not to seek the peace of those nations — that is, not to make them comfortable about living together. This is a warning for believers today. Do not marry unbelievers, and do not make unbelievers feel there is no difference between us and them. Today, however, we have a positive gospel for unbelievers. We seek to win them to the Lord, so that they may be saved.
Notice the order of the prayer. Ezra praises God's grace and mercy first. Only then does he name the sin.
But why does he recite this proof of the Lord's grace and mercy? It was to show the character of His people's sin. He goes on, "And now, O our God, what shall we say after this? For we have forsaken your commandments." He then confesses that they had sinned against both light and grace. He conceals nothing and excuses nothing, but spreads it all out before God.
Ezra could have prayed about their sin. He says we instead, and one writer makes that pronoun the test of a real confession.
In a day of ruin, when we look at the state of God's people, there can be no true prayer without true confession. And true confession is not saying, "They have sinned," but, "We have sinned."
One striking thing is missing from the prayer, and it is missing on purpose.
Notice also that Ezra does not once pray for forgiveness. Anyone who understands the mind of God will see that he could not. When there is known evil in our hearts or in the assembly, our first responsibility is to judge it, not to pray for forgiveness.
The same writer turns the question on the reader:
Is it not true that we have largely joined ourselves to the people of the world? Have we not given in to their habits, ways, and customs? Is worldliness not our ruin?
- Word first. Ezra's confession is a quotation. He measures his people by what God commanded, not by how he feels. That word shows a God who will not link Himself with impurity.
- Defilement named. The land was unclean because of what its peoples did. Mixing with them gave up the separation that Israel's whole standing before God rested on.
- Reach accepted. The command covered marriage, and even the seeking of those nations' peace. One writer draws the same line for believers now, while adding that the gospel goes out to all.
- Ownership taken. Ezra says "we," not "they." He recites God's kindness first, so the sin shows up as sin against both light and grace.
- Action follows. He asks for no forgiveness while the evil remains; known evil must be judged and put away, not just prayed over.
Now therefore give not your daughters to their sons, neither take their daughters to your sons, nor seek their peace or their prosperity for ever; that ye may be strong, and eat the good of the land, and leave it for an inheritance to your children for ever.
Ezra has learned that God's people have married into the surrounding nations. Priests and leaders led the way. In his prayer he quotes God's own words back to Him. This verse is the heart of that quotation. It holds a command about marriage, a warning about seeking the good of the nations nearby, and a promise for those who obey.
Ezra does not invent a rule for the crisis in front of him. He reaches for what God had already said, and those who gathered to him had learned the same thing from him.
The first effect of Ezra's self-humbling is to gather around him those who tremble at the words of God. They are marked by what they have learned under Ezra's guidance. Through him they know the word of God, and in it they have found the character of God, who can in no way tie Himself to impurity. Has He not said, "Be holy, for I am holy" (Lev. 11:44)?
Marriage can look like a private matter. One writer shows what an Israelite gave up by marrying outside the nation.
"You have broken faith," he says, "and have married foreign women." For an Israelite, as far as the people were concerned, this was the great mark of falling away. It was falling away from God, in taking a foreign god. It was falling away from the people, in taking foreign wives. It meant completely giving up their holy place of separateness to the Lord.
The command does not stop at marriage. It also rules out working for the comfort of the nations nearby. One writer applies this to believers today, and then adds what has changed since Ezra's day.
Ezra went on in his prayer to recall that God had warned Israel not to intermarry with the nations of the land. God had even warned them not to seek the peace of those nations — that is, not to make them comfortable about living together. This is a warning for believers today. We are not to marry unbelievers. We are not to make unbelievers feel that there is no difference between us and them. Today, though, we have a positive gospel for unbelievers. We seek to win them to the Lord, so that they may be saved and share the same blessings we have.
The verse ends with a promise of three things: strength, the good of the land, and an inheritance for the children. An earlier generation lost all three.
To join themselves to the nations was to give up being set apart for Him. Ezra's companions had valued this holiness, and it had guided them up to that day (8:28). This was the very thing their predecessors had failed to keep. Such alliances — which for us match worldliness — had taken them over. They spread like gangrene from the priests and leaders of the people down to the common people themselves. They had forgotten that when separation goes, three great things go with it: strength, the enjoyment of the good things of the land of Canaan, and a lasting inheritance for themselves and their children (v. 12).
Other people broke the commands named in this verse. Yet Ezra's prayer never sets him apart from the guilty.
One striking feature runs through the whole confession. He identified himself with the people, and confessed the evils as though they were his own. From start to finish he says "we" and "us", where we might have expected "they" and "them". He also owned that the evils in front of him were old sins coming back to life — sins that had stained his people from the very beginning, or, as he put it, "since the days of our fathers". What made it worse was this: they were repeating those sins after God had shown such mercy. He had already freed them from the consequences their former sins had brought.
Confession is not the end of the matter. One writer warns about praying when action is what is needed.
And yet how often Satan deceives the Lord's people when evil has come out into the open. He suggests, through one person or another, "Let us pray about it." We must confess our sins. But even then we confess only as we seek grace and strength to deal with the evil and to separate ourselves from it. In this chapter Ezra lies before the Lord, owning his people's guilt. In the next chapter we see him acting with energy against the sin he had confessed, refusing to rest until he had put it away.
- Command — Ezra prays God's own words back to Him. Those who stood with him trembled at what God had said. They had learned that He cannot tie Himself to impurity.
- Cost — Marrying into the nations meant giving up their separateness to the Lord. It was a double turning away: from God, and from His people.
- Loss — When separation went, three things went with it: strength, the good of the land, and the inheritance left to their children.
- Reach — The ban on seeking the nations' peace warns against blurring the line. Today the gospel goes out to win outsiders into the same blessing.
- Response — Ezra confessed as "we", not "they". Then he acted, refusing to rest until he had put the evil away.
And after all that is come upon us for our evil deeds and for our great trespass, seeing that thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities [deserve], and hast given us such deliverance as this,
Ezra has just heard that the exiles who returned have married into the nations around them, and he tears his clothes and kneels to pray. His prayer asks God for nothing; it weighs the guilt, the captivity and the return, and says what they show about God.
The verse sits at a hinge in the prayer. Before Ezra names the present sin, he retells God's kindness. One writer explains why he takes that order.
The order of Ezra's confessions is most instructive. He first owns the sins of his brothers and declares God right in His ways with His people. Then he magnifies the grace that visited them in their low estate, brought them — a remnant — back to the land, and let them set up the house of their God once again. But why does he recite this proof of the Lord's grace and mercy? It was to show the character of His people's sin... and he confesses that they had sinned against both light and grace. He conceals nothing, and excuses nothing, but spreads it all out before God.
The heart of the verse is Ezra's verdict on the exile itself. He does not call the punishment harsh. He calls it restrained. One writer explains what it was aiming at.
After all Israel's disobedience and guilt, Ezra considered that God had punished them less than their iniquities deserved (v. 13). God had indeed punished them. But His purpose was to drive them back to Himself, not merely to punish them. Then He wonderfully delivered them from the harshness of that punishment by restoring them to their land.
The verse ends with what God gave: "such a remnant as this." One writer explains the picture behind that gift.
The remnant through His mercy had escaped, and God had given them "a nail in His holy place" (Isaiah 22:23). Like a nail in the wall, fixed and immovable, so God had established them in Jerusalem.
Ezra is not confessing a new failure. He is confessing the return of an old one, and mercy makes the repeat worse.
One remarkable feature of the whole confession is that he identified himself with the people, and confessed the evils as though they were his own. From beginning to end he uses "we" and "us," where we might have expected "they" and "them." He also acknowledged that the evils confronting him were a revival of the sins that had defiled his people from the start — or, as he put it, "since the days of our fathers." But they were made worse because they were being repeated after God had shown such mercy in relieving them of the governmental consequences of their former sins.
The next verse spells out the fear behind this one. What if such mercy meets the same sin again? Ezra asks whether God would then consume them and leave no remnant at all — the very thing verse 13 says He had not done (H. L. Rossier).
One detail is easy to miss: Ezra never asks God to forgive them. One writer draws a principle from that silence.
It should also be observed that Ezra does not once pray for forgiveness. With any understanding of the mind of God, it was impossible that he should do so. Suppose there is known evil in our hearts or among God's people. Our first responsibility is to judge it, not to pray for forgiveness. So when Joshua lay on his face before the Lord after Israel's defeat by the men of Ai, the Lord said, "Get up! Why have you fallen on your face? Israel has sinned."
The pattern still fits today. Hole applies it to any time of revival that has drifted back. He says believers now would do well to kneel with words like Ezra's — usually confessing as people caught up in the failure themselves, not only as people standing with those who failed (F. B. Hole).
- Deserved. Ezra weighs the exile and calls it mild. God punished them less than their iniquities deserved.
- Given. What followed the punishment was pure gift: a remnant brought home, fixed in place like a nail driven into a wall.
- Weighed. He recalls that mercy not to comfort himself, but to show what his people's sin really is.
- Owned. He says "we" and "us" throughout, confessing his people's evils as though they were his own.
- Judged. He asks for no forgiveness. Where evil is known, the first duty is to judge it, not to pray about it.
should we again break thy commandments, and join in affinity with the peoples of these abominations? wouldest thou not be angry with us till thou hadst consumed us, so that there should be no remnant nor any to escape?
Ezra has just recited God's mercy in bringing a remnant home from exile. Now he turns that mercy into a question: after such kindness, dare they break God's commandments again and marry into the nations God condemned?
The order of Ezra's prayer matters. He recites God's kindness before he names the sin.
First he owned the sins of his brothers, and justified God in His ways with His people. Next he magnifies the grace which had visited them in their low estate. That grace had brought them — a remnant — back to the land, and had let them set up the house of their God once again. But why does he recite this proof of the Lord's grace and mercy? It was to show the character of His people's sin... he confesses that they had sinned against both light and grace. He conceals nothing, and excuses nothing, but spreads it all out before God.
Intermarrying with the nations around them sounds like a social matter. For an Israelite it was a double desertion.
You have transgressed, he says, and have taken foreign wives. For an Israelite, as far as the people were concerned, this was the great mark of apostasy — apostasy from God in taking a foreign god, and apostasy from the people in taking foreign wives. It was a complete giving up of their holy place of separation to the Lord.
The wrong was not only in what they lost, but in what they denied God.
In itself this broke a basic requirement of the Lord's will. It gave up that separation to Himself from the nations, which was essential to their standing as His people. They were not only surrendering their own privilege as the sole nation of His choice. They were rebelling against the rights and glory of God, Who had so favoured them.
Behind the word "again" stands what Ezra had just said. The punishment they had already borne was lighter than their guilt deserved.
After all the disobedience and guilt of Israel, Ezra considered that God had punished them less than their iniquities deserved. God had indeed punished them, but His purpose was to drive them back to Him, not simply to punish them. Then He gave them a wonderful deliverance from the severity of that punishment: He restored them to their land.
Ezra names what God would be right to do, and leaves it standing.
After such kindness shown by God, Ezra asks whether they should break His commandments again and intermarry with the peoples who practice these abominations. He saw this as a most ungrateful way of responding to God's grace. So he expected God to act in anger, and to consume Israel until no remnant at all was left.
Notice who Ezra puts inside the question. He is not accusing others from a safe distance.
His prayer held confession in it, thorough and unreserved. In a day of ruin, when we look at the state of God's people, there cannot be true prayer without true confession. And true confession is not saying, "They have sinned," but, "We have sinned."
One writer turns the same charge on Christians today, and puts it as questions rather than a verdict.
The place of confession is always the place of restoration and of spiritual power. So it is always a sign of a bad condition when that place is rarely taken. Let us then challenge ourselves for a moment... Is it not true that we have largely "joined in alliance" with the people of the world? Have we not submitted ourselves to their habits, ways, and customs? Is not worldliness our ruin?
- Mercy first. Ezra names God's kindness first. That sets the measure of the sin: it was sin against grace.
- Mercy restrained. God had punished them less than their guilt deserved. He punished them to bring them back, not to make them suffer.
- Mercy repaid badly. To marry into the nations again would be apostasy twice over. It leaves God, and it leaves the separated place He gave them.
- Mercy exhausted. Ezra names the outcome himself. God would have reason to consume them, leaving no remnant and no one to escape.
- Mercy applied. True confession says "we have sinned," not "they have sinned." And the same question about mixing with the world stands over believers now.
Jehovah, God of Israel, thou art righteous; for we are a remnant that is escaped, as [it is] this day. Behold, we are before thee in our trespasses; for there is no standing before thee because of this.
Ezra's long prayer over the exiles who had married into the nations around them ends with a verdict, not a request: God is righteous, and the guilty have no ground to stand on. So the closing words raise a hard question — if my guilt leaves me unable to stand before God, what happens next?
The prayer has an unusual shape. The time of day matters, and so does what is missing from it.
At the time of the evening sacrifice, when there was a small picture pointing to the sacrifice of Christ, Ezra arose with his torn garments. He fell on his knees to approach God in the remarkable prayer recorded in verses 6-15. In it he makes no request at all. From first to last it is humble and heartbroken confession of sins he had not shared in himself.
What Ezra leaves out matters as much as what he says. He hands the whole case over to God and suggests no outcome.
Notice that Ezra does not ask forgiveness for the people, but simply confesses Israel's guilt before the Lord, leaving God to do as He sees fit with them. He declares that God is righteous in leaving only the few Jews as a remnant. Yet because God is righteous, no one in that remnant could stand before Him, because of their guilt.
Ezra calls God righteous. He is taking sides, and he has just recalled the mercy that spared them. One writer explains why he brings that mercy up.
But why does he recall this proof of the Lord's grace and mercy? It was to show what His people's sin really was. He hides nothing and excuses nothing, but spreads it all out before God. He then ends by justifying God once more, and by taking His part against himself and the people.
To stand is a word about judgment. Scripture ties it to God's throne, and to whether a sinner can hold his ground there.
These passages connect the thought of standing with the throne of God. Its action must go out in judgment against the sinner, unless God can forgive the guilty one. "But with you there is forgiveness," we read, "that you may be feared." Before that throne, then, the sinner in his sins cannot stand. Scripture does not teach that his standing is a bad one that he must change. It states plainly that as a sinner he has no standing before a God of judgment. He does not need a better standing, because by nature he has none at all. Apart from redemption and atonement the sinner has no standing before God's throne. What he needs is to gain one.
Ezra had not married a foreign wife. Yet from start to finish he says "we." Commentators treat this as the mark of true confession.
Confession, thorough and unreserved, was in it. In a day of ruin, when you look at the state of God's people, there cannot be true prayer without true confession. And true confession is not saying, "They have sinned," but, "We have sinned."
Standing before God "in our guilt" sounds like a dead end. Writers on this chapter read it as the place where recovery starts and spreads.
Is restoration possible at this moment for these poor escaped souls? Yes. It is found in the attitude of those who had no part in this defilement. They still take responsibility for it so fully that they identify themselves with those who remain under God's judgment. We shall see what this does. Held with a sincere heart before God, this attitude and this thorough confession of evil work on those who had sinned and bring them back.
One writer adds what it means when people stay away from that ground.
The place of confession is always the place of both restoration and spiritual power. So it is always a sign of a bad condition when people seldom take that place.
- Righteous — Ezra's verdict on God comes first. He takes God's part against himself and his people instead of defending them.
- Remnant — the survivors are alive by mercy, not by merit. Ezra points to that mercy to show how serious the sin is.
- Cannot stand — before God's throne a sinner has no ground at all. Only forgiveness can give him one.
- We, not they — Ezra confesses sins he never committed. Writers call this the test of real prayer in a day of ruin.
- Restoration — the ground where no one can stand is where recovery starts. One person who takes it draws the guilty back with him.
And while Ezra prayed, and made confession, weeping and falling down before the house of God, there were gathered to him out of Israel a very great congregation of men and women and children; for the people wept very much.
Ezra had just learned that the returned exiles had married into the nations around them. He gave no orders. He broke down and prayed in front of the house of God. What happens next is one of Scripture's clearest pictures of how the grief of one man can move a whole people.
Ezra's distress shows itself in four ways at once. One writer weighs what that told the people.
The Lord used the sorrow of His servant to reach the consciences of His people. They had been guilty of breaking His commandments. Ezra's sorrow was no common sorrow. Everything here shows how intense his grief was... By his prayer, his confessions, his tears, and his falling to the ground before God, he had poured out his grief for the sins of Israel. And he did it in the open, "before the house of God." So it became known to those he had been pleading for.
Ezra confessed the sin as if it were his own. One reference work notes who else prayed that way.
It is beautiful to see how Ezra, Nehemiah, and Daniel confessed the sins of the people as if they had been their own. Ezra 9:1-15; Ezra 10:1; Neh. 1:6; Neh. 9:2-3; Dan. 9:4-20.
Ezra could have ordered the people to repent. One writer points to what he did instead.
Ezra prayed and made confession, weeping and casting himself down before the house of God — not merely telling other people to do so, but doing it himself.
The crowd in this verse did not appear from nowhere. One writer traces how such a gathering grows.
We cannot stress enough how much the blessing of the people of God may depend on one or a few faithful people. Here one man humbles himself. A few then join him. And this leads to a general humbling. And once again a single man steps forward to put it into words.
Men, women and children came to Ezra. The remedy would break up their homes. So why were they weeping? One writer weighs two answers.
The people saw his great sorrow and his tears, they heard his words confessing the nation's sins. It produced a wonderful effect among the people... Was this great weeping real contrition over their disobedience? Or did they weep because they saw the coming separation from the wives they had taken? No doubt they thought of what that separation would mean for them. Yet it was an awakened conscience that produced the tears of repentance.
Some people are uneasy with strong feeling in religion. One writer meets that discomfort head on.
In verse one, we see Ezra on his knees, and as he confessed, moved by deep emotion that revealed itself in weeping. Some of us are made in such a way that we dislike anything emotional. But we must recognise this: conviction that goes deep, whether about things good or things evil, is bound to produce emotion... Paul was not a mere theologian, setting out Christian doctrine in a philosophical way. He was an eager servant of Christ, moved in his spirit by what he preached and by the needs of both saints and sinners.
The chapter is not just history. One writer turns it into a question for us.
First, like the godly among the returned remnant, let us own our failure and humble ourselves in the dust before God. Let us judge the low moral condition that has led to confusion and division. As we have seen, Ezra confessed the failure with weeping... Let us challenge ourselves! Have we ever wept before the Lord, with broken hearts, over our own failures and the failures we share?
- Grief first. Ezra's sorrow was no common sorrow. Prayer, confession, tears and falling to the ground — all four, and all in the open before the house of God.
- Grief owned. He confessed the nation's sin as if it were his own, standing with Nehemiah and Daniel in that rare habit.
- Grief lived, not ordered. He did not tell others to humble themselves; he did it himself, and the crowd gathered to him.
- Grief spreads. The blessing of God's people can hang on one or a few faithful people. One man's humbling drew a few, then the whole nation, then a single voice to speak for them all.
- Grief that feels. Deep conviction is bound to show itself in emotion. The honest question: have we ever wept over the failure we share?
And Shechaniah the son of Jehiel, of the sons of Elam, answered and said to Ezra, We have acted unfaithfully toward our God, and have taken foreign wives of the peoples of the land; yet now there is hope for Israel concerning this thing.
Ezra lies weeping in front of God's house because the returned exiles have married women from the nations around them. Then Shecaniah speaks up — first confessing the sin, then saying the damage can still be repaired.
The sin troubled nobody until Ezra arrived and took God's side against it. What followed traces back to one man's willingness to stand alone.
First, it is worth noticing how the Lord uses the faithful zeal of one person to wake others up to their condition. Before Ezra came, everyone's conscience seems to have gone numb... Ezra was alone, and he would have stayed alone if necessary, in taking God's side against the people's sin. But that took courage and a single eye, and by grace Ezra had both. God was with him in the stand he was taking, and now we see the effect. Shecaniah comes forward on behalf of the people, owns their sin, and accepts that they must submit to the Word... In times of evil, the only path of blessing is the path of faithfulness.
Shechaniah says "we," not "they." What makes that costly is the list further on in the chapter: his own father Jehiel is named among the offenders.
Shecaniah, the people's spokesman, shows an energy and selflessness here that ought to be an example to us. His father, Jehiel, was among those who had sinned (v. 26)! Only the power of God, joined to zeal, could make him set aside his own family interests and take up God's cause alone. Yet this energetic man does not try to make a name for himself in the work of restoration. He counts himself as nothing. He judges that the matter rests on Ezra, the "scribe skilled in the Law of Moses"... In his eyes, the man who carries the Word — indeed the Word itself — must play the leading part.
The hope does not rest on excusing what happened. It arrives on the far side of admitting it.
Where there is confession of failure there is hope. Shechaniah put it well: "We have trespassed against our God... yet now there is hope in Israel." I do not think he took it lightly. In fact, his father was among the 'problem cases' (verse 26). He suggests that the confession and prayer should be matched by action (v. 3) — what an encouragement for Ezra (v. 4)!
Others note that this was the only answer God gave. Ezra's prayer drew no voice from heaven, but it drew a voice from among the guilty.
Unlike so many times before, no prophet brings the answer. But God answers in the hearts of the guilty. "We have broken faith with our God," said one among them; "but even now there is hope for Israel in spite of this." And they set to work with all their heart.
Ezra could not lift himself out of his grief, and the assembly wept with him. The turn came from somebody else.
His grief was such that he could not rise above it, and even the people "wept bitterly." It was a place of weeping indeed, but tears are not power. Things might have stayed that way. Then one man, Shecaniah, confessed the sin and rose in the strength of faith in God, declaring that there was still hope for Israel. So he urged Ezra to "arise... and do" — to take hold of God, to act on his prayers, and to expect God's help. He did so, and great was the reformation.
But the order runs both ways. Action without self-humbling makes the ruin worse.
Humiliation is not yet separation from evil. It is the road to that separation and prepares for it. But when the work is repairing ruin, activity without humiliation can only lead to more ruin, however zealous it is.
Shecaniah ends his proposal with an appeal to what was written. Nothing else, one writer says, reforms God's people.
Shecaniah also owns the authority of the Word. "Let it be done," he says, "according to the law."... There is, in truth, no other way of reformation among God's people.
Shecaniah's remedy was to send the foreign wives and their children away. That belonged to the law, and one writer draws a sharp line between it and the Christian's case.
Under law, as in the passage before us, the foreign wife and her children were to be sent away. But under grace the unbelieving wife is sanctified by her husband, and the children are holy... The law sent the wives and children away because they were unclean, so Israel could not receive them into the congregation... Under grace the unconverted wife is set apart through her husband. This holiness is purely external and carries no saving power, for salvation is always tied to personal faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Even so, it gives the priceless privilege of being in the place of blessing.
- One — the recovery starts with one man willing to take God's side alone. When every other conscience has gone quiet, faithfulness is still the only path of blessing.
- We — Shecaniah says "we," not "they," though his own father is on the list of guilty men. He owns the people's sin and asks for no part for himself.
- Even now — hope does not replace confession; it comes on the far side of it: "we have broken faith... but even now there is hope."
- Do — tears are not power. Humiliation must move into action, and action without humiliation only deepens the ruin.
- Written — the standard is the Word, not the mood of the moment. That remedy itself belonged to the law; under grace God sets an unbelieving wife apart through her husband.
And now let us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives, and such as are born of them, according to the counsel of [my] lord, and of those that tremble at the commandments of our God; and let it be done according to the law.
Ezra had wept in front of the whole assembly over marriages that broke God's command. Shecaniah answers with a plan: make a covenant with God, send the foreign wives and their children away, and settle it by what is written.
Shecaniah speaks of hope only after he owns the guilt as his own. One writer notes what that cost him: his own father was among the guilty.
Where there is confession of failure there is hope. Shecaniah put it well: "We have broken faith with our God, but even now there is hope for Israel." I do not think he took it lightly. In fact, his father was among the "problem cases" (verse 26). He suggests that action should go with the confession and prayer (v. 3) — what an encouragement for Ezra (v. 4)!
Shecaniah asks for a covenant that would break up homes, including his father's. Another writer draws attention to what he did not ask for — a place at the front.
Shecaniah, the people's spokesman, shows energy and unselfishness that ought to be an example to us. His father, Jehiel, was among the guilty (v. 26)! It took the power of God, joined to the zeal of Phinehas, to make him give up all his own family interests. He took up God's cause alone. Still, this energetic man does not look for a place in the work of restoration. He counts himself as nothing.
The covenant Shecaniah proposes turns grief into a decision. The same writer warns that grief on its own is not enough, and that action without grief makes matters worse.
Humiliation is not yet separation from evil. It is the road to that separation and prepares for it. But when ruin has to be put right, activity without humiliation can lead to nothing but more ruin, however zealous it is. If humiliation has not judged the flesh, the flesh throws off all restraint when evil has to be put away. Such was the zeal of Jehu. This man did not carry the sin of the people as his own before God, and so, once the judgment was carried out, he was the first to go back to the golden calves at Dan and Bethel.
The last clause of the verse decides who sets the terms. Shecaniah invents no remedy of his own; he asks that the written Word settle it.
Notice too that Shecaniah owns the authority of the Word. "Let it be done," he says, "according to the Law." Ezra's mission was to restore the authority of the law over the ways of the people, if not over their hearts and consciences (Ezra 7:10), and God had now given him a helper in Shecaniah. There is truly no other way of reform among God's people.
Weakness and small numbers did not lower the standard.
This devoted and earnest servant of God did not say, "We are only a very small remnant compared with the nation before the exile, so no one can expect us to carry out what is written in God's Word." No! He valued the law of the LORD, and he wanted others to value it too.
Shecaniah's plan sent the children away as well. Commentators point out that this belonged to the law, and that grace works the other way.
Both the wives and the children born to them were to be sent away. The wives were not of Israel, so they were unclean, and the children of these mixed marriages counted as unclean too. This was under law — but under grace all of this is reversed. That does not leave a Christian free to marry someone who is not converted. But as the apostle teaches, "the unbelieving husband is made holy because of his wife, and the unbelieving wife is made holy because of her husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy." (1 Cor. 7:14.)
The difference matters most where one partner comes to faith after the wedding.
Under law nothing could turn a Moabite into an Israelite, but under grace an unbeliever may become a believer. This gives no permission at all for a believer to marry an unbeliever, since 2 Corinthians 6:14 plainly forbids it. But if one partner is converted after the marriage, he is encouraged to bring the grace and faith of Christianity into the marriage now, in patient testimony. It may be the means of the other's conversion.
- Confession — Shecaniah says "we," not "they." Hope follows owning the failure, not excusing it.
- Cost — his own father was among the guilty. He still pressed for the remedy, and claimed no leading place in it.
- Action — humbling before God prepares for separation from evil, but is not yet separation. Zeal without that humbling, like Jehu's, only adds to the ruin.
- Standard — "according to the Law" hands the decision back to Scripture. Weakness never lowered what God had written.
- Grace — the law sent the foreign wife and her children away. Under grace the believing partner stays, and the children count as holy.
Arise, for this matter is incumbent on thee, and we will be with thee be of good courage, and do [it].
Ezra had been weeping before God over marriages that broke Israel's separation from the nations around it. Now a man from the crowd speaks up — not with more grief, but with a plan, a promise of backing, and a push to act.
Ezra had prayed and confessed. Commentators read Shecaniah's answer as God's reply.
He urges Ezra forward. "Arise," he said; "for it is your task, and we are with you; be strong and do it." How welcome these words must have been to Ezra's burdened heart! And no doubt he would see in them God stepping in to answer his prayers. He had indeed learned the source of all wisdom and strength. So he turned to the Lord before he tried to correct the abuses that were widespread in Israel. And so the Lord went before him, prepared the way, and inclined the people to confess and put away their sin.
Shecaniah did not pick Ezra at random. The task was his because of a choice he had made long before.
A special responsibility rested on Ezra in this matter. As we saw in the early part of Ezra 7, he had prepared his heart to seek, and do, and teach the law of the Lord. Shechaniah recognized this, so he said to him, "Arise, for it is your task." And he assured Ezra of the support of those who feared God in the action he had to take.
Shecaniah could have stayed quiet, and he could have made himself the hero.
Shecaniah, the people's spokesman, here shows an energy and unselfishness which ought to be an example to us. His father, Jehiel, was among the offenders (v. 26)! It took the power of God, joined to the zeal of Phinehas, to move him. He abandoned all his own family interests and took up the cause of God by himself. Yet this energetic man does not seek a role for himself in the work of restoration; he is of no importance in his own eyes. He judges that the thing rests on Ezra, "a scribe skilled in the Law of Moses that the Lord, the God of Israel, had given". In his eyes, the bearer of the Word — let us say the Word itself — must play the main role.
One man's faithfulness had woken the rest.
It is worth noticing how the Lord uses the faithful zeal of one man to wake others up to their condition. Before Ezra arrived, everyone's conscience seemed dead... Ezra was alone, and alone he would be, if necessary, in taking God's side against the wrongdoing of the people. But it needed courage and a single eye, and by grace Ezra had both... In times of evil, the only path of blessing — and even of success, in its divine sense — is the path of fidelity.
Tears were the right start, but not the finish. And zeal that skips the tears only adds to the ruin.
Individual humiliation comes first, and then collective humiliation. But neither the individual nor the people of God may stop there. Action must follow humiliation... Humiliation is not yet separation from evil. It is the path to this separation and prepares it. But when ruin has to be repaired, activity without humiliation can lead only to further ruin, however zealous it may be. The flesh, unjudged in humiliation, throws off all restraint when it is a question of separation from evil. Such was the zeal of Jehu.
The effect went far beyond what one man could produce.
One cannot but be struck with the spiritual power shown by one man. The secret of it was that he was in communion with the mind of God. He stood in faithfulness for God while everyone around him was unfaithful. And so God was with His servant, and worked with him. To the outward eye, Ezra was almost alone. But the truth is, it was God and Ezra. And so the hearts of the people bowed before him.
Writers are careful about carrying the remedy straight across into the present.
Such an action certainly shows how serious the evil of sinful associations is. We must not play down how serious this is. In our day, under grace, we cannot demand that anyone put away a wife, even an unsaved one. The nations Israel was mixing with were demon worshipers, so God had completely forbidden marriage with them. Believers today are not under such a law. But Scripture does say to them, "Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers" (2 Cor. 6:14). If they disobey this, Scripture does not tell them to put away the unbeliever.
- Pray first. Ezra turned to God before he tried to fix anything. The Lord "went before him, prepared the way", and this verse is the answer arriving.
- Prepared first. The task belonged to Ezra because he had already set his heart to seek, do, and teach God's word.
- Then arise. Sorrow that stops at tears is not yet separation from evil. But action without humiliation "can lead only to further ruin". The word is "be strong and do it."
- Never alone. To the eye Ezra stood by himself; in fact "it was God and Ezra" — and God moved others to say, "we are with you."
Then Ezra arose, and made the chiefs of the priests, of the Levites, and of all Israel, to swear that they would do according to this word. And they swore.
Ezra had been mourning before the house of God, and Shecaniah had just told him to get up and act. Verse 5 is the turn: Ezra puts the people under oath, starting with their leaders.
Shecaniah told Ezra to arise. One writer reads that call as the moment when grief has to turn into action.
Humbling comes first, for the individual and then for the whole people of God. But neither the individual nor the people of God may stay there. Action must follow. "Arise", Shecaniah says to Ezra, "for this matter rests on you, and we will be with you. Take courage and do it" (v. 4). Being humbled is not yet separation from evil. It is the road to that separation, and it prepares it. But when ruin has to be put right, activity without humbling can only lead to further ruin, however zealous it is. If the flesh has not been judged in that humbling, it throws off all restraint as soon as separation from evil is in question.
The people had already said they would act. The oath made that promise binding — and it showed what God was doing through one man.
Ezra took the opportunity which the Lord had made for him, and he "made the leading priests and Levites and all Israel take an oath that they would do as had been said. So they took the oath." (v. 5.) In this way he bound them by a solemn oath to do what they had promised. It is striking to see such spiritual power in one man. The secret was this: he was in communion with the mind of God. He stood in faithfulness for God while everyone around him was unfaithful. So God was with His servant and worked with him. To the outward eye, Ezra was almost alone. But the truth is, it was God and Ezra, and that is how the people's hearts came to bow before him.
The oath started at the top. Ezra began with the leading priests and Levites, then took in all Israel.
On this Ezra acts. He makes them all swear to it, from the highest downward, while he himself keeps fasting and mourning (verses 5 and 6).
What they swore to was already given in writing. One writer points out that Shecaniah left the lead to the man who carried that Word instead of taking it himself.
Still, this energetic man does not seek a role for himself in the work of restoration. He is of no importance in his own eyes. He judges that the matter rests on Ezra, the "skilled scribe in the law of Moses, which the Lord, the God of Israel, had given". In his eyes the bearer of the Word — let us say the Word itself — must play the main part.
The oath bound them to obey what had already been given. When things have drifted, another writer argues, nothing less than the written Word will do.
Over time, and this happens in every age, people take up customs, human sayings, traditions and the like, and they neglect the written Word (see Matt. 15; 1 Tim. 4). All of these richly breed corruption, in heart and life, and in the way God's house is governed. So when people have drifted away, there is only one remedy. Apply that Word strictly — the Word that is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword — and refuse everything it condemns.
Getting the leaders to swear did not lift the burden off Ezra.
But even when the people's hearts had changed and they had decided to act, Ezra does not stop expressing his humiliation. Dishonour had come on the name of the Lord, and it still clung to that name. Until the cleansing was complete, mourning and fasting suited those who had resolved to separate themselves from evil.
- Arise. Grief over sin is the road to separation from it, not a substitute. Zeal that skips the grief only deepens the ruin.
- Swear. Ezra turns the people's spoken agreement into a solemn oath. A good intention becomes an obligation.
- From the top. The oath runs from the highest downward, beginning with the leading priests and Levites.
- According to the Word. They bound themselves to what was already written. When people drift, only the strict use of that Word puts things right — and the Word, not a strong personality, leads.
- Still fasting. Ezra keeps mourning after the oath. Mourning fits until the cleansing is complete and the dishonour no longer clings to God's name.
And Ezra arose from before the house of God, and went into the chamber of Jehohanan the son of Eliashib; and when he came thither, he ate no bread and drank no water; for he mourned because of the unfaithfulness of them that had been carried away.
Ezra has just made the leaders swear to put away their foreign wives, yet he now leaves them, shuts himself in a room, and refuses food and water. Why does his grief grow after the crisis is settled, and what does mourning over another person's sin do?
The leaders had sworn, and the people's hearts had turned. Ezra still grieved, and one writer says why the promise alone was not enough.
Even after the hearts of the people had changed, and they had decided to act, Ezra does not stop showing his humiliation. The name of the Lord had been dishonoured, and that dishonour still clung to it. Until the cleansing was complete, mourning and fasting suited those who had decided to separate themselves from evil.
Ezra mourned over the unfaithfulness of the exiles. In the Old Testament that kind of sin is a trespass — a wrong done to God or to a neighbour.
A trespass-offering assumed that someone had done something that wronged the Lord or his neighbour... And it was not only one person here and there who was guilty of such a sin. The whole nation was found guilty of it. They were guilty when they turned to idolatry before the Babylonian captivity. They were guilty again when those who came back married into the peoples of the countries around them, after the Lord had in mercy allowed them to return to their land.
Ezra did not shut himself away to escape the problem. One writer ties his fasting to the power God gave him, and points to the disciples who failed to cast out a demon.
Ezra felt the sin of his people according to God, and it was in this way God qualified him to separate His people from their sin. When the Lord came down from the mountain and cast out the demon from the afflicted boy, His disciples asked, "Why could we not cast it out?"... And surely we may say that an unclean spirit had entered Israel at this time. It was because Ezra had been before God with prayer and fasting that God could use him to cast it out. Is this not the secret of all spiritual power — to be alone with God like this? There is indeed no power without it.
Note that the older translation Dennett quotes includes "prayer and fasting" in Matthew 17:21; the ESV renders the Lord's answer as "Because of your little faith."
One writer turns Ezra's time alone into advice for us, and sets Daniel beside him.
How good it is if we take time alone with God, unhurried, searching our hearts, whenever serious trouble comes among God's people. Daniel, when deeply troubled about the low state of his people Israel, "was mourning for three weeks."
Time in God's presence did not soothe Ezra's conscience. It sharpened it, and one writer contrasts him with Christians today.
He still mourned because of the transgression of the people. This deeply spiritual man of God sought God's presence, and in His holy presence he felt the sin of the people afresh. What deep exercise of soul Ezra passed through! This is what is so sadly lacking in our own days. So many make light of the sin and worldliness of those who claim the Name of Christ. We see very little heart-searching, true humbling, and self-judgment.
The sin Ezra mourned was not his own. One writer sees here the mark of a person in communion with God, and a faint picture of Christ.
Only those who are... in communion with the mind of God can weigh their sin as it affects the holy Name by which they are called. They are the ones who share His affections for His own. They are the ones filled first and foremost with zeal for His glory. They can go down, take up the sin, make it their own, and tell it all out before God. Moses, Nehemiah, Daniel and Ezra are all examples of this, each in his own measure. But all of them... are only faint pictures of Him who so identified Himself with His people that in confessing their sins He said, "O God, you know my folly; the wrongs I have done are not hidden from you."
- Dishonour — Ezra grieved over the stain on God's name, not over whether the people had agreed to act. Mourning suited him until the cleansing was finished.
- Trespass — the sin he wept over wronged God Himself, in the same way a man wrongs the neighbour he robs.
- Alone — he left the crowd for a closed room. Writers commend that quiet, unhurried time with God whenever trouble breaks out among His people.
- Power — his fasting was not a gesture. It was why God could use him to drive the evil out. There is no spiritual power without time alone with God.
- Ownership — he confessed a sin that was not his. In that he is a faint picture of Christ, who made His people's sins His own.
And they made proclamation in Judah and Jerusalem to all the children of the captivity, that they should gather themselves together unto Jerusalem;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
and that whosoever would not come within three days, according to the counsel of the princes and the elders, all his substance should be confiscated, and himself separated from the congregation of those that had been carried away.
The leaders gave every returned exile three days to reach Jerusalem, or lose his property and his place among God's people. Two questions follow: why the threat reached everyone when only some had sinned, and what being cut off from the congregation meant.
The order is severe, and it comes from a man who had already mourned and fasted over the same sin. One writer traces Ezra's power to that fasting, not to his rank:
Ezra felt the sin of his people as God feels it, and this is how God made him fit to separate His people from their sin. When the Lord came down from the mountain, He cast the demon out of the afflicted boy. His disciples asked, "Why could we not cast it out?" The answer was, "Because of your little faith." He then said that faith can move mountains, and added that this kind does not go out except by prayer and fasting. We may well say that an unclean spirit had entered Israel at this time. Ezra had been before God with prayer and fasting, and that is why he could be used to cast it out.
The severity restores something Israel had let drop:
The energy of a few no longer tolerates any disobedience among the people. All must submit. Those who refuse are counted as "wicked" and are cut off from the assembly. The people's moral slackness had neglected this discipline entirely and brought it to a halt. Now it is carried out according to God.
The proclamation made no distinction between the guilty and the rest. One commentator meets the obvious objection:
Why should the order apply to those who were not guilty of mixing with the nations? Because the evil of even a few affected all, though in this case it was more than a few. But all the people were meant to feel the guilt that Israel had brought on itself by the evil allowed among them. Then that evil would not be so likely to rise again quickly. We must always feel the shame of wrongs done in our own company. We must take God's side in judging them rightly.
The second penalty needs explaining. A Bible dictionary lists this verse under excommunication — being cut off from the people of God:
The word does not appear in the Authorised Version, the older English Bible. Even so, the duty of excommunicating wicked persons from the fold of Israel, and from the church as the house of God, is plainly taught. Again and again in the Old Testament we read that for particular sins "that soul shall be cut off from Israel" or "cut off from his people" (Ex. 12:15; Ex. 30:33, 38; Lev. 7:20-21, 25, 27; Num. 9:13; Ezra 10:8, and others). How far this was acted on we do not know.
The people did not resist the summons. They took the demand as the law's claim on them:
Israel is summoned to come up to Jerusalem, each one under pain of exclusion. The matter was urgent. The congregation acknowledge that it is their duty to obey the law.
The same writer sets this discipline in its wider frame — what faithfulness meant for a remnant just back from Babylon:
Once again we find what marks the working of the Spirit of God and God's intervention among His people, as to their walk and moral condition. It is separation from all who are not the people of God as they were. ... Finally, as to their own wives, several of whom had borne them children, they have to put them away. They must separate themselves, whatever the cost, from everything that was not Israel. This is what marks faithfulness in a position like theirs: a remnant come out of Babylon, busy restoring the temple and the service of God according to what still remained to them.
- Mourning first. Ezra could summon others only because he had first felt their sin as God feels it. Prayer and fasting, not rank, made him fit to deal with it.
- Discipline restored. The threat in verse 8 is discipline picked up again after long neglect, and now carried out according to God.
- All summoned. Every returned exile had to appear. The evil of a few touched everyone, and everyone needed to feel the shame.
- Cut off. Losing his substance was loss; being separated from the congregation was exclusion — the Old Testament pattern of a soul "cut off from his people."
- At any cost. For a remnant just out of Babylon, faithfulness meant separation from everything that was not Israel. The three-day summons forced them to choose it, whatever the cost.
Then were all the men of Judah and Benjamin gathered together at Jerusalem within three days. It was the ninth month, on the twentieth of the month; and all the people sat in the open space of the house of God, trembling because of the matter, and because of the pouring rain.
A three-day summons brought every returned exile to Jerusalem, into the open square by the temple, in the winter rain of the ninth month. They trembled for two reasons — the sin now being dealt with, and the downpour — and commentators see God at work in both.
The people did not simply drift in. Anyone who stayed away was to be cut off, and one writer sees in that firmness the return of something long abandoned.
The energy of a few no longer tolerates any disobedience among the people. All must submit themselves. Anyone who refuses is counted as "wicked" and is cut off from the assembly... The people's moral slackness had completely neglected and stopped this discipline. Now it is exercised according to God.
One writer keeps the outward misery and the inward grief together.
All came, "all the men of Judah and Benjamin," in the ninth month, on the twentieth day of the month. It must have been a striking scene, easy to picture... Their physical discomfort only added to the sorrow within.
Another writer notes the season, and offers a careful guess at what the rain may have said to them.
They tremble because of "this matter" and because of the bad weather (it was in the middle of the rainy season). Perhaps the heavy rainfalls reminded them of God's judgement, but in any case they certainly added to their discomfort.
The order would break up their own homes, yet no one fought it. One writer traces that back to Ezra.
Perhaps it was Ezra's prayer and self-judgment that kept the people from resisting this order, for generally those who have sunk into evil are stubborn enough to resist any reproof. But God was working, as He always does in response to faith and self-judgment.
The work could not be finished in a day. One writer finds God's patience in the delay.
Sometimes material difficulties oppose immediate purification. This could not be "a task for one day or for two", for the evil was widespread and, as everyone confessed, "we have greatly transgressed in this matter". In this way God makes them understand that it is harder to repair evil than to commit it. But He is full of patience and mercy, and He takes account of the heart's decision. He knows that the guilty are not looking for loopholes, and that they truly want to obey.
Trembling was not the end of it. Ezra told them to confess and to separate — and one writer finds the force of the chapter in the order he named.
Too often the soul deceives itself even by confession — confession without judging the sin... The order of the separation is also most instructive — "from the peoples of the land and from the foreign wives." Marrying the foreign wives had been the sin, so you might expect these to be named first. But what had led to these marriages? Keeping company with the peoples of the land. This was the root of the trouble, so Ezra deals with it first. In every departure from God it is the same: until you find the root, nothing is gained and restoration is impossible.
Another writer shows what each half looks like without the other.
It is sadly possible to confess wrongdoing and yet go on with it in more subtle and hidden ways. It is also possible to see that a certain kind of wrongdoing does not pay, and to give it up, without ever confessing that it was wrong. But when the conviction of sin is genuine, a person first confesses the sin, and then forsakes it, as Proverbs 28:13 plainly indicates.
- Summons. A three-day deadline brought every man of Judah and Benjamin to Jerusalem. Discipline long neglected was at work again.
- Trembling. Two things shook them at once — the sin now being dealt with, and the winter downpour. The outward misery deepened the grief inside.
- Softening. They came without resisting. One writer credits Ezra's own prayer and self-judgment; God works in answer to that.
- Patience. The rain made same-day cleansing impossible. God used the delay to teach that evil is harder to repair than to commit, and He took account of their hearts.
- Separation. Confession alone deceives. It must be joined to forsaking. Ezra named the root first — company with the peoples of the land, not just the marriages it produced.
And Ezra the priest stood up and said to them, Ye have acted unfaithfully, and have taken foreign wives, to increase the trespass of Israel.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And now make confession to Jehovah the God of your fathers, and do his pleasure, and separate yourselves from the peoples of the land, and from the foreign wives.
Ezra stands before the gathered people and names their sin out loud: they have married foreign wives. His remedy has two halves — confession made to God, and separation carried out in practice.
Commentators read these marriages as apostasy — a turning away from God — and as a surrender of the very thing that made Israel Israel.
And Ezra stands up again, and now plainly charges them with their sin. "You have transgressed," he says, "and have taken foreign wives." For an Israelite this was the great mark of apostasy, as far as the people were concerned. It was apostasy from God in taking a foreign god, and apostasy from the people in taking foreign wives. It was a complete giving up of their holy place of separateness to the Lord.
Ezra's wording shifts here, and the shift has a purpose.
Ezra speaks to them. He no longer says, as in Ezra 9:7, "We have been in great guilt." Now he says, "You have broken faith and married foreign women… separate yourselves" (vv. 10, 11). It is now a matter of reaching the conscience of those who have sinned.
Ezra's first word is not about the wives at all. It is about God, and what confessing to God commits a person to.
Ezra rose and addressed them. First, he charged them with their sin (v. 10). Then he urged them to confess to the Lord God of their fathers, and to do His will (v. 11). So his first thought was about what was due to the Lord. But if they confessed to Him, they must submit themselves to His will.
Confession and separation are joined in the verse because either one on its own can be counterfeit.
These two things appear in verse 11. It is sadly possible to confess wrongdoing and yet continue in it in more subtle and unseen ways. It is also possible to realise that wrongdoing of a certain sort is not profitable and to give it up, but without any confession of wrong in the matter. But when the conviction of sin is genuine, there is first confession of the sin, and then a forsaking of it, as Proverbs 28:13 plainly shows.
The verse names the peoples of the land first and the foreign wives second — the reverse of what the story would lead you to expect.
The order of the separation is most instructive — "from the peoples of the land, and from the foreign wives." Since marrying the foreign wives had been the sin, you might think the wives would be mentioned first. But what had led to these marriages? Association with the people of the land. This was the root of the mischief, and Ezra deals with it first. So in every departure from God, nothing is gained until you reach the root, and restoration is impossible.
Breaking these marriages meant breaking real families.
We know what this must have been. The wives would appeal to their husbands' love, and the poor children would be on their knees asking why their fathers should disown them. It was a time of agony for many a father and mother in Israel who had been found out in their sin. But the truth is that there is no real repentance without deep grief and pain.
Real repentance also takes time, and God allows for that.
Sometimes material difficulties stand in the way of immediate cleansing. This could not be "a work for one day or two." The evil was widespread, and as everyone confessed, "there are many of us who have transgressed in this thing." In this way God makes them understand that it is harder to repair evil than to commit it. But He is full of patience and mercy, and He takes account of the heart's decision. He knows that the guilty ones are not looking for loopholes and that they truly want to obey.
Ruin in the wider picture never lowers the standard for faithful people.
The apostasy of Israel and then of Judah led to the world-power of the Gentiles. It did not cancel God's will for faithful men, and still less does the ruin of Christendom cancel it for the Christian now… Separation to God now is not merely outward and of the flesh. It is in the Spirit's power, as taught in the word… We are called to do His will in obedience to His word, and this is binding, whatever the cost. The danger is using the state of ruin as an excuse for slackness.
- Confess — Ezra's first demand looks Godward. Own the sin to the Lord before doing anything about it.
- Submit — confessing to God commits you to do His will, not just to feel sorry.
- Sever the root — the verse names the peoples of the land before the wives. Mixing with them came first, and nothing changes until that root is cut.
- Count the cost — real repentance here meant grief and pain, and the writers do not soften it.
- Keep going — repairing evil takes longer than committing it, and God is patient with hearts set on obeying, not on finding loopholes.
And the whole congregation answered and said with a loud voice, Yes, it is for us to do according to thy words.
The Jews who had come back from exile sit in the open square in heavy rain while Ezra names their sin. Why does a guilty crowd agree so fast to something so costly, and what does that yes commit them to?
They were answering a demand with two halves: confession, and then separation. One commentator shows why confession alone was not enough:
Too often the soul deceives itself even by confession — confession without judging the sin. Ezra knew the word and the ways of God far too well to allow this. So there must be self-judgment and separation from the evil, as well as confession of it. The order of the separation is also most instructive — "from the people of the land, and from the foreign wives." Marrying the foreign wives had been the sin. So you might expect the wives to be named first. But what had led to these marriages? Association with the people of the land. This was the root of the trouble, and so Ezra deals with it first. So it is in every turning away from God: until you find the root, nothing is gained and restoration is impossible.
A crowd caught in wrongdoing usually argues back. This one did not. One writer traces that to what happened before Ezra stood up to speak:
Ezra then spoke briefly and to the point... Perhaps it was Ezra's prayer and self-judgment that kept the people from resisting this order. Those who have sunk into evil are usually stubborn enough to resist any correction. But God was working, as He always does in response to faith and self-judgment.
A second pressure was already on them: God's anger over the matter had become real to them:
The power of God was still clearly with His servant. The people agreed to his demands. They had been made to feel that "the fierce wrath of their God" was on them because of their sins. They answered, "It is so; we must do as you have said."
Grief over sin is not the same as clearing the sin away. But skipping the grief ruins the clearing away:
Humbling comes first — for the individual, and then for the people together. But neither the individual nor the people of God may stay there. Action must follow that humbling. "Arise," Shecaniah says to Ezra, "for this matter is your responsibility, and we will be with you: be of good courage, and do it" (v. 4). Humbling is not yet separation from evil. It is the path to that separation and prepares it. But when the aim is to repair ruin, activity without humbling can only lead to further ruin, however zealous it is. The flesh was never judged in that humbling, so it throws off all restraint when separation from evil is required.
Their word is not "we may" but "we must." One writer reads the whole episode as a standing answer to anyone who thinks a damaged situation lowers the standard:
Israel fell away from God, and then Judah, and this brought the Gentiles to world power. That did not cancel God's will for faithful men. Still less does the ruin of Christendom cancel it for the Christian now... We are called to do His will in obedience to His word; and we must do it, whatever the cost. The danger is in using a state of ruin as an excuse for slackness. A true heart would feel it a louder call to watch and pray.
Right after this loud yes, the people ask for time. The rain is heavy and the cases are many:
On top of their sorrow over the faults they had committed came the bad season, "a time of pouring rain, and it was not possible to stand outside" (v. 13). Sometimes practical difficulties stand in the way of immediate cleansing. This could not be "a work for one day or two." The evil was widespread and, as everyone confessed, "we are many who have transgressed in this thing." In this way God makes them understand that it is harder to repair the evil done than to commit it. But He is full of patience and mercy, and He takes account of the heart's decision. He knows that the guilty ones are not looking for loopholes and that they truly want to obey.
Verse 15 names four men, and commentators differ over whether they were appointed to the work or were objecting to it. Those who read it as objection still see the target as the timetable, not the decision:
In verse 15 we read of those "who were employed about this matter." But the translation of this sentence is more than doubtful. It has been rendered "they stood up against this." If there was opposition it was not opposition to the separation decree. They probably opposed the method that had been suggested; they may have demanded immediate action.
- Root. Ezra calls the marriages sin, then points further back — to mixing with the peoples of the land. Until you find the root, nothing is gained.
- Humbling. Sorrow comes before action; zeal that skips self-judgment only produces more ruin.
- Answer. Ezra prayed and judged himself first, and the crowd never argued back. God works where faith goes first.
- Cost. Their word is "must," not "may." A ruined situation is no excuse for slackness; it is a louder call to watch and pray.
- Patience. God accepts a decision of the heart that takes months to carry out. He knows the difference between delay and a loophole.
But the people are many, and it is a time of pouring rain, and it is not possible to stand without neither is this a work for one day or two; for we are many that have transgressed in this thing.
The people agreed with Ezra at once, then named three obstacles: their numbers, the winter rain, and a sin too deep to settle in a day or two. Their answer raises a hard question: is asking for more time repentance, or is it an excuse?
They had accepted Ezra's charge outright, and only then described what stood in the way.
The power of God was still clearly with His servant. The people agreed to his demands. They had been made to feel that "the fierce wrath of their God" was on them because of their sins. They answered, "As you have said, so we must do." They only pleaded that they could not do the work there and then.
They sat outdoors, shaking from two causes at once — the matter itself, and the weather:
We see them sitting in the open square in front of the house of the LORD. They were a trembling, frightened company, because of this matter and also the great rain. The cold, rainy season had started.
The rain was a real obstacle. The deeper one was how far the sin had spread.
Sometimes material difficulties oppose immediate purification. This could not be "a task for one day or for two", for the evil was widespread, and, as everyone confessed, many of them had transgressed in this matter. In this way God makes them understand that repairing the evil done is harder than committing it. But He is full of patience and mercy, and He takes account of what the heart has decided. He knows the guilty ones are not looking for loopholes, and that they really want to obey.
Behind the words "we have greatly transgressed in this matter" lay homes that were about to break up. Commentators do not soften this.
We know how the wives would appeal to their husbands' love, and how the poor children would be on their knees to ask why their fathers should disown them. We know what a scene of grief and pleading this must have been. It was a time of agony for many a father and mother in Israel caught in this sin. But the truth is that there is no real repentance without deep grief and pain.
Kelly adds that the pain runs deepest when God's own people have brought His name into contempt, and have done so for years. Then no step of repentance comes "without its costing much to the heart on every side."
Some in the crowd had kept themselves clean. They could have demanded action on the spot, rain or no rain.
In difficult circumstances, may we also show the patience of Ezra, the patience of God, toward our brothers, so that we do not discourage them. Some had escaped and had taken no part in this wrongdoing. To them it might have seemed that they had to separate from the evil at once, despite the pouring rain. Love between brothers does not calculate in this way. It knows that these words, "we have greatly transgressed in this matter", are not empty words.
The outcome shows what kind of delay this was.
The plea and counsel of the people were accepted... By the first day of the first month they had finished with all the men who had married foreign wives. So in two months the work was completed.
That is the line between asking for time and using ruin as an excuse. The same danger stands today:
We are called to do His will in obedience to His word; and this urgently, whatever the cost. The danger is from claiming laxity because of a state of ruin. A true heart would feel it a louder call to watch and pray.
- Conviction first. The people said yes to Ezra before they mentioned the rain. Their ask for time followed obedience; it did not replace it.
- Time is honest. God was teaching them that evil takes longer to repair than to commit. He also reads the heart: does it want to obey, or to find a loophole?
- Time costs. Wives and children would plead; there is no real repentance without deep grief and pain.
- Time needs love. Those who had stayed clean could have demanded instant action. Love between brothers does not calculate that way.
- Time ends. Two months later the work was finished. A real delay ends in obedience. A false one uses ruin as a cover for going slack.
Let now our princes, while this matter is going on, stand for all the congregation, and let all those that have taken foreign wives in our cities come at the appointed times, and with them the elders of every city, and the judges thereof, until the fierce anger of our God be turned from us.
The people have just agreed with Ezra that the foreign marriages must end. Now they ask for a timetable instead of a same-day purge, and that raises a hard question: when a wrong is too tangled to fix in a day, is a schedule faith or evasion?
This crowd did not fight the order. One writer traces that to what Ezra had already done to himself.
Perhaps it was Ezra's prayer and self-judgment that kept the people from resisting this order. Normally, those who have sunk into evil are stubborn enough to resist any correction. But God was working, as He always does in response to faith and self-judgment.
The people name the goal of the whole process: God's fierce anger turned away. One writer explains why that was pressing on them.
The power of God was clearly still with His servant. The people agreed to his demands. They had been made to feel that "the fierce wrath of their God" was on them because of their sins.
They ask for set times because the wrong cannot be undone in a day. One writer reads this as God's own lesson to them, and reads their plea as honest.
Sometimes practical difficulties stand in the way of immediate cleansing. This could not be "a work for one day or two", because the evil was widespread and, as everyone admitted, "they were many that had transgressed in this thing". In this way God makes them understand that it is harder to repair evil than to commit it. But He is full of patience and mercy, and He takes account of the heart's decision. He knows that the guilty ones are not looking for loopholes, and that they truly want to obey.
Someone in that crowd with clean hands could have said that rain is no excuse to leave sin in place. The same writer answers that.
May we as well, in difficult circumstances, exercise the patience of Ezra, the patience of God, toward our brothers, lest they be discouraged. Those who were "a remnant that had escaped", and who had taken no part in this sin, might have thought that separation from evil had to happen at once, despite the "pouring rain". Brotherly love does not reason like that.
The proposal admits the case is hard. It never suggests dropping it. One writer draws that line clearly.
Well, the matter before Ezra certainly was complex. It could not be 'sorted out' in a day. It took thorough examination (v. 16) three months. So the complexity meant that the matter would take time to resolve, not that it should not be addressed in the first place.
Commentators differ on the length: one counts the work as two months, another as three.
The plan brings in the elders and judges of each city, instead of one mass decision. What followed shows why that mattered.
Ezra and the heads of the families — men who knew the Word well, wise and respected by the people — "sat down… to examine the matter". The evil was obvious. The question was not whether it existed. Each case deserved its own discernment and judgment according to God… They gave judgment in love. They spared no one and favoured no one, beginning with the priests.
Ezra did not override the people's plan. He accepted it and organised the work.
The plea and counsel of the people were accepted, and next we have the names of those who were put to work on the matter… So in two months the work was completed.
- Until — the goal. They set the finish line at God's anger turned away. They felt His fierce wrath on them for their sin.
- Until — the honesty. Asking for set times was no loophole. God was teaching them that repairing evil costs more than committing it.
- Until — the patience. Love does not demand instant separation from those who genuinely want to obey but cannot finish in a day.
- Until — the method. Elders and judges in every city meant each case got its own hearing. They spared no one, starting with the priests.
- Until — the finish. Difficulty set the timetable, not the verdict. Ezra accepted the plan, organised it, and saw it through.
Only Jonathan the son of Asahel and Jahzeiah the son of Tikvah stood up against this; and Meshullam and Shabbethai the Levite helped them.
The whole gathering had just agreed to put away a great evil. Then one short sentence names four men who would not join in. What were these men doing? And what happens to a work of God when some of His people hold back?
This verse can be read in two opposite ways, and older English translations split over it. One writer weighs both readings and decides from what follows:
A strange difficulty appears in verse 15. The words might mean being appointed over this business, or opposing it. The Authorized Version favours the first reading, the Revised Version the second. But the context seems to decide for opposition. Verse 16 is clear. Not only Ezra but certain heads of families, all of them named, were set apart, and they sat down to examine the matter. These carried out the task in order; whereas only four had stood up against this proposal.
Commentators differ on how firmly this can be settled. Another writer, reading the verse as a list of men appointed to the work, adds a cautious note:
It is not clear whether those named in verse 15 were not rather opposing the suggestion of the people. One translation gives, "Stood up against this matter." Certainly Ezra and the heads of the families did the work (v. 16).
Scripture names the four men but gives no reason for their stand. One writer feels the loss, and can only guess at what moved them:
If only the feeling that moved the people had been unanimous! Sadly, it was not. What motives could have turned them onto this path of opposition? None are given to us. At most, we might guess at one of them. If he is the same Meshullam as the Levite of verse 29, he had taken part in the evil himself. That would give him personal reasons for opposing the decision of the assembly.
So how did the rest respond to the four? The same writer draws out what they did, and what became of one of them:
Faced with this opposition, which was completely against the mind of God, what do those who have decided to purify themselves do? They do not exclude their brothers. They bear with them. The self-will of these few needs no other judgment than the decisive action of the majority. Later, to our joy, we see Shabbethai the Levite used to help the people understand the law, and then set over the outward business of the house of God (Neh. 8:7; Neh. 11:16). He was more guilty than the others because of his office, and because he identified himself with Meshullam. Indeed, the opposition of these men in no way influences the decision of the assembly. It is even a means by which God tests the resolve of their brothers' hearts. It does not stop the whole company from moving forward.
after-note: DELETE
The Levites were the tribe set apart to serve at the temple.
The work went forward even so. One writer turns to these very verses when asking how much agreement a decision needs:
A unanimous decision is desirable, but not absolutely necessary (see Ezra 10:15-17; 2 Cor. 2:6). A decision made by an assembly should be recognised as an assembly decision when those burdened with the matter search for His mind. They search filled with reverent awe towards God, and conscious of their responsibility before the Lord. It is not a question of infallibility, but a question of the authority which the Lord grants to the local assembly when it acts in His Name.
But what if an assembly is divided over a case of discipline?
To decide by majority, as worldly meetings do, would plainly be human and therefore false. Far too many proofs show that the majority is not always right, in church matters as well as in worldly questions. I have heard of a case where one brother refused to agree with the unanimous judgment of all the brothers in the assembly. His brothers had grace, and they trusted the guidance of the Holy Spirit, so they waited. Soon afterwards it became clear that the single brother had been right and the others wrong. Full agreement seems most desirable, above all in the solemn matter of exclusion from an assembly. Those who wait on the Lord and for the guidance of His Spirit will not be disappointed.
- Reading — The verse can mean these four men were put in charge of the matter, or that they resisted it. Verse 16 gives the work to Ezra and the named heads of families, which points to resistance.
- Silence — Scripture names the four but gives no reason for their stand. The one guess offered is that one of them had a personal stake in the evil under judgment.
- Patience — The rest did not expel the four. They bore with them, and let the decisive action of the whole body answer for itself. The opposition tested their resolve; it did not stop the work.
- Recovery — Shabbethai's office made his opposition the worst of all. Yet he is later found helping people understand the law, and trusted with the business of God's house.
- Balance — Full agreement is desirable, but a decision can stand without it. Even so, the majority is not always right, so waiting on the Lord's guidance is never wasted.
And the children of the captivity did so. And Ezra the priest [and] certain of the chief fathers were separated according to their fathers' houses, and all of them [expressed] by name; and they sat down on the first day of the tenth month to examine the matter.
The whole assembly had just agreed that the mixed marriages must be dealt with. But agreement is not action. Here the work passes from a crowd standing in the rain to a short list of named men. They sit down and begin, case by case.
Older translations say these men "were separated"; the ESV says Ezra "selected" them. No one was purifying them — Ezra was picking men for a job. One writer spells out that sense, and notes how long the work took:
The people's plea and advice were accepted, and next we are given the names of those employed in this matter (verse 15). Ezra the priest, with certain chief fathers, all of them named, "were separated" — that is, set apart for this work — and sat down on the first day of the tenth month to examine the matter. They finished with all the men who had married foreign wives by the first day of the first month. So in two months the work was completed.
Verse 15 is hard to translate. It can mean four men were appointed over the matter, or that they stood against it. Commentators differ, and one argues that this verse settles the question in favour of opposition:
An unusual difficulty appears in verse 15. The words might mean appointment over this, or opposition to it... But the context appears to decide for opposition. For verse 16 is clear that not only Ezra but certain chief fathers, and all by name, were separated, and sat down to examine the matter. These carried out the task in order; whereas only four had stood up against this proposal.
Others read verse 15 the other way, treating those four as the men employed in the work. Either way, the men named here did the work.
If the sin was already public, why sit down and investigate at all? One writer answers that the general fact was never in question — the individual cases were. He also traces how the whole matter ended:
On the first day of the tenth month, Ezra and the chiefs of the fathers sat down "to examine the matter". They were men who knew the Word well, wise and respected by the people. The evil was plain. The question was not whether it existed; it was that each case deserved its own discernment and judgment according to God... They judged in love, sparing no one and showing no favouritism, and they began with the priests... The list of offenders is long, but what grace! The restoration is carried out without any new break, through humbling that becomes a source of decision and energy, and through the ministry of the Word.
Why take weeks over this instead of settling it in one afternoon? One writer calls the slow way love, not weakness:
In hard times, may we also show the patience of Ezra, the patience of God, toward our brothers, so they are not discouraged. Those who were "a remnant that escaped" had not shared in this sin. To them it might have seemed that they must separate from the evil at once, that very moment, despite the "pouring rain". Brotherly love does not calculate in this way.
The record gives two calm months. One writer stops to name the pain behind them:
We know what a scene of grief and pleading this must have been. For many a father and mother in Israel whose sin had come to light, it was a time of agony. But the truth is that there is no real repentance without deep grief and pain.
Someone will object that a small, broken group cannot afford to be strict. One writer turns that reasoning around, and applies it to the state of the Christian world today:
Israel fell away, and then Judah, and that brought in the world-power of the Gentiles. Even so, it did not cancel God's will for faithful men. Still less does the ruin of Christendom cancel it for the Christian now... We are called to do His will in obedience to His word, and this without exception, whatever the cost. The danger is claiming permission to be lax because things are in ruins. A true heart would feel it a louder call to watch and pray.
- Separated — for service. Ezra picks named heads of families and sets them apart for a job. They handle what the whole assembly had agreed to.
- Named — so answerable. The record names every man on the panel. They do the work in order, while only four had stood against the plan.
- Examined — case by case. The sin was already obvious. Each case still needed discernment before God, with no favouritism, starting with the priests.
- Patient — not hasty. Steady sitting for months, instead of one dramatic day, is love that refuses to discourage the many who had failed.
- Costly — therefore real. Behind the tidy dates lies real agony. And weakness now is a louder call to obey, not a licence for less.
And they ended with all the men that had taken foreign wives by the first day of the first month.
Men among the returned exiles had married women from the surrounding nations, and a commission sat down to work through every case. Verse 17 gives the date that work ended, and it raises questions about method, cost, and timing.
The sin was public knowledge. The commission was not hunting for proof that evil existed. Its job was to weigh each case, and it shielded no one — least of all men in office.
On the first day of the tenth month, Ezra and the heads of the families "sat down… to examine the matter". They knew the Word well, and they were wise and respected by the people. The evil was plain. The question was not whether it existed. Each case deserved its own discernment and judgment according to God. Three full months were enough to set this huge difficulty in order. They judged in love, sparing no one and favouring no one, and they began with the priests.
Commentators differ on how long the process ran. Rossier counts three months from the tenth month to the first; others count the span differently:
So in two months the work was completed.
A finishing date also tells us something about method. This work was not rushed, and that is part of the lesson.
First, we are told how carefully and in what good order they did this work. Putting away the foreign wives was difficult and distressing. In this way they freed themselves from a worldly and sinful entanglement. Had it been done in an impulsive and reckless way, it might have brought further dishonour on the name of the Lord. This too may have a voice for us. As we grow in grace and understand God's will better, we may see that something we thought little of is really a spiritual entanglement and hindrance. Let us get out of it in a way that is worthy of the Lord whom we serve and obey. If it means a loss for someone, let us take the loss ourselves instead of putting it on others.
The first day of the first month was not a random calendar point. It opened Israel's year. What follows in the chapter is a long list of names.
The first day of the first month (Nisan — March-April) is the time of the New Year, the new beginning according to Exodus 12:1. Then follows the list of the men who had married the foreign women. God's record is again before us in these names.
Behind the words "come to the end" lie broken homes. These men had wives, and some had children. Ending the matter meant grief, not paperwork.
We know what this must have been. The wives would appeal to their husbands' love. The poor children would be on their knees, asking why their fathers should disown them. It must have been a scene of grief and pleading. It was a time of agony for many a father and mother in Israel, now found out in their sin. But the truth is that there is no real repentance without deep grief and pain.
The long list of names looks like nothing but a record of failure. Rossier sees something else in it:
The list is a long one, but what grace! The restoration is carried out without any new break, through humiliation that becomes a source of decision and energy, and through the ministry of the Word.
Someone could argue that a weak and broken people cannot be held to strict standards. The answer runs the other way:
Israel turned away from God, and Judah did the same. That led to the Gentile nations holding world power. Yet it did not cancel God's will for faithful men. Still less does the ruin of Christendom cancel it for the Christian now. We are called to do His will in obedience to His word, and this without exception, whatever the cost. The danger is claiming laxity because of a state of ruin. A true heart would feel it a louder call to watch and pray.
- Examined. The wrong was obvious, yet they weighed each case on its own. They judged in love, sparing no one, starting with the priests.
- Ordered. They worked carefully, not impulsively. A reckless clean-up would only have added dishonour to God's name.
- Costly. Wives pleaded and children knelt. Fathers and mothers went through agony. Real repentance never comes without deep grief and pain.
- Restored. The work ended on the first day of the first month, the New Year of Exodus 12:1. The restoration came with no new break, and a finished judgment opened into a fresh start.
- Binding. Ruin in Israel did not cancel God's will for faithful men. Ruin in Christendom does not cancel it now. A weak day is a louder call to watch and pray, not an excuse for laxity.
And among the sons of the priests there were found that had taken foreign wives, of the sons of Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and his brethren Maaseiah, and Eliezer, and Jarib, and Gedaliah.
Ezra 10 lists the men who had married foreign wives, and it starts with priests. What does it mean when the failure of God's people begins at the top?
Two groups of priests appear in the list, and one group carried more guilt than the other.
First come the names of the priests who had fallen into sin, and these fall into two classes. In verse 18 there are "the sons of Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and his brothers;" and in verses 20-22 other priests. The first group seem to have been the more guilty, and with reason. By the grace of God, Jeshua and Zerubbabel had led His people in building His house. It shows that these men had lost all conscience about the nature of their sin. "The lips of a priest should guard knowledge, and people should seek instruction from his mouth, for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts." But here the priests had corrupted the people by their evil ways. When they were dealt with, "they pledged themselves to put away their wives, and their guilt offering was a ram of the flock for their guilt." Notice that this is only said of Jeshua's relatives.
Jeshua son of Jozadak was the first high priest after the exile; he had stood with Zerubbabel, the governor, to rebuild the altar and the temple. His household heading the list of offenders is the point of the verse.
The names of the priests come first. Theirs was the greater responsibility and guilt. The sons of Joshua head the list. What an illustration of what man is! The sons of the high priest had been such great instruments of the Lord, with Zerubbabel, to lead the first captives back — and yet they corrupted themselves with these women.
The sin recorded here had already been traced to the top earlier in the book. Those who lead do not sin alone; their example travels.
Nor was this sin confined to any one class of the people. "The hand of the officials and chief men has been foremost in this faithlessness." The record names the priests and the Levites too, as well as the people. It would seem then that the officials and chief men had first set the example, and that the others had only been too ready to follow. "One sinner destroys much good," especially when that one has a place of position and influence. When a standard-bearer faints in the day of battle, the soldiers behind him are often discouraged and easily defeated. In the same way, once Satan has trapped a leader in the church of God, he often finds it easy work to ensnare many who are less noticeable.
When the findings were written up, rank bought no protection.
And more than a hundred were found, four of priestly rank. Their names follow without respect of persons (vers. 18-44).
That written roll has a wider lesson attached to it:
This leads to our second observation — that nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or (in the case of unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. The apostle says: "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil."
Being named was only the start. Sending these wives away tore whole households apart.
We know what a scene of grief and pleading this must have been. It was a time of agony for many a father and mother in Israel who had been found out in their sin. But the truth is that there is no real repentance without deep grief and pain. That is even more true when the sin is not just one sinner's sin, but the sin of the people of God — when they feel deeply that, as God's people, they have brought His name into such contempt.
- Priests first. The list of offenders opens with priests. The sons of Jeshua the high priest head it. The failure began where the responsibility was greatest.
- Teachers turned corrupters. A priest's lips were meant to guard knowledge. Instead these priests corrupted the people by their evil ways. All conscience about their sin was gone.
- Influence multiplies. "One sinner destroys much good." That is most true when the sinner holds a place of influence. When the standard-bearer faints, the soldiers behind him lose heart.
- Named, not shielded. The names follow without respect of persons. Rank gave no cover. Nothing escapes God's eye; He weighs and records all we do.
- Repentance costs. There is no real repentance without deep grief and pain. Here it reached into homes, wives and children. That was the cost of putting right the contempt brought on His name.
And they gave their hand to send away their wives; and they offered a ram of the flock, as trespass-offering for their guilt.
The last chapter of Ezra lists the men who had married women from the surrounding nations, and the first names on it are priests. This verse records what they did: a promise sealed by hand, a ram brought for their guilt, and their names kept on record. (Older translations call the ram a "trespass offering".)
The men in this verse were not ordinary offenders. They were priests, and some were descendants of Jeshua, a leader in building God's house.
First come the names of the priests who had fallen into sin. The sons of Jeshua seem to have been held the more guilty, and with reason. In the grace of God, Jeshua had stood with Zerubbabel as a leader of God's people in building His house. It shows that they had lost all sense of what their sin really was. "A priest's lips should guard knowledge, and the people should seek instruction from his mouth, for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts." But here the priests had corrupted the people by their evil ways. Note too that only Jeshua's relatives are said to have given their hand and offered the ram.
This was not the first line they had drawn against the people around them. But this one ran through their own homes.
They flatly refused any share in the work to the people of the land who wanted to join them in building the temple. Last of all, they have to send away their own wives, several of whom had borne them children. They have to separate themselves, at whatever cost, from everything that was not Israel. This is what marks out faithfulness in a position like theirs.
The word "trespass" has a particular sense. It names a sin that cheats someone of what is due to them.
A wife who was unfaithful to her husband committed a trespass... And those of the returned remnant who married foreign wives were guilty of trespass for that reason. In all these cases we can trace the mark of the sin that called for a trespass offering. God, or man, was cheated in one way or another of what was due to them.
Their office did not shield them. It made the offering count for more.
They passed judgment in love. They spared no one and favoured no one, and they began with the priests. Their position made them more guilty than their brothers, and their guilt offering was a ram of the flock. Having admitted their sin, they could bring no other sacrifice than this one. But because of their office, it mattered that their offering showed their humbling in the open.
The trespass offering was for wrongs the law could not wave away. Set beside others who trespassed and were dealt with in judgment, this remnant's sacrifice stands out as mercy.
These are instances of trespasses which God could not pass over, and for most of which the law could provide no sacrifice. The returned remnant did, it is true, offer a trespass-offering for their failure in the matter of the strange wives.
One writer draws a line from the ram to Christ, and then to how we treat our own sin.
When they gave their promise to send away their foreign wives, they presented a ram as a trespass offering. Whenever we have been guilty of any sin, we must remember that Christ is "the propitiation for our sins" (1 John 2:1-2). If we think hard about the agony He suffered because of our sins, are we likely to drift back into sin again? So self-judgment should be real, and full.
"Propitiation" means the sacrifice that satisfies God over sin.
The book closes with a list of offenders, which looks like a bleak finish.
It was sad indeed that there had been such failure among the remnant, the few who had returned to the place of God's choice! But we should not miss what else this list holds. These are the names of men who offered a ram for their trespass and gave their hand to put right what was wrong. In other words, the book of Ezra ends with a list of people who have been restored!
That the names were written down at all carries its own weight.
Nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out again, either to magnify His grace or, in the case of unbelievers, as the ground of righteous judgment.
- Recorded — nothing escapes God's eye. He weighs and writes down every action, and one day He will bring it out again, either to magnify His grace or as ground for judgment.
- Owned — they named the guilt instead of softening it. Judgment fell without favour, starting with the priests, whose office made them more guilty than the rest.
- Costly — the pledge meant parting from wives who had borne them children. That is what faithfulness looked like in their position.
- Covered — a trespass cheats God or man of what is due, and these men could bring no other sacrifice. The ram points on to Christ, the propitiation for our sins, so self-judgment should be real and full.
- Restored — the closing list is not a roll of shame. The book ends with the names of people who put right what was wrong.
And of the children of Immer Hanani, and Zebadiah.
Ezra 10:20 is one line in a long register of names. It lists men who had married foreign wives and then put them away. Two questions follow. Why does God write down the names of those who failed? And why do priests head the list?
Where a name sits in this register matters.
First, the record gives the names of the priests who had fallen into sin, and these fall into two classes. Verse 18 names "the sons of Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and his brothers"; verses 20-22 name other priests. The first group, it seems, were counted the more guilty, and with reason. God in His grace had joined Jeshua with Zerubbabel as the leaders of His people in building His house.
Hanani and Zebadiah belong to the family of Immer. Its place in priestly service is known. Its line back to Aaron is not.
A family of priests who bore this name. One of them had charge of the sixteenth course of priestly service. Some returned from exile, and two of these had married foreign wives. But there is no record of their descent from Aaron.
The order of the names is not flattering to those who led Israel's worship.
God's record is again before us in these names. The names of the priests come first. Theirs was the greater responsibility and guilt.
Another writer notes that failure in the families of God's servants is nothing new.
But this should not surprise us, for similar tragedies have been all too frequent. We need only point to Aaron and his two sons, Samuel and his sons, Eli and his sons, David and his sons, Hezekiah and his son Manasseh... The recognition of this fact should lead us to be much in prayer for the families of those who serve the Lord Jesus.
Why keep a list of names in a chapter about sin?
This leads to our second observation — nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or (in the case of unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Cor. 5:10)
There is a kinder way to read the same names.
Notice that the names given are of those who put away the foreign wives and offered a trespass offering. Taking these wives was to their discredit. Putting them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, through the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
How the wrong was put right mattered too.
First, we are told how carefully and in what good order they carried out the difficult and distressing work of putting away the foreign wives, and so freed themselves from this worldly and sinful entanglement. If they had done it in an impulsive and reckless way, it might have brought further dishonour on the name of the Lord... Let us get out of such an entanglement in a way that is worthy of the Lord whom we serve and obey. If, for instance, someone has to bear a loss, let us accept the loss ourselves, instead of putting it on others.
Could a weak, half-recovered people claim that the old standard no longer applied?
Israel turned away from God, and then Judah did the same. That brought world power into the hands of the Gentiles, the nations outside Israel. Yet it did not cancel God's will for faithful men. Still less does the ruin of Christendom cancel it for the Christian now... We are called to do His will in obedience to His word; and we must do it, whatever the cost. The danger is in claiming freedom to be lax because everything is in ruin. A true heart would feel it a louder call to watch and pray.
- Recorded — This verse sits in the second group of guilty priests (vv. 20-22). Verse 18 names the family of Jeshua, counted more guilty for their place as leaders in building God's house.
- Named — Immer's family held the sixteenth course of priestly service. Two of its sons who returned from exile had married foreign wives, and no record traces their descent from Aaron.
- Weighed — Nothing escapes God's eye. He weighs and records every action, and one day He will bring it out, either to magnify His grace or as the ground of righteous judgment.
- Restored — The men named are the ones who put the wives away and brought a trespass offering. The record stands to their credit, as backsliders restored.
- Costly — Ruin is no excuse for a lower standard. Do God's will whatever the cost. Get out of an entanglement in a way worthy of the Lord, bearing the loss yourself rather than pushing it onto others.
And of the children of Harim Maaseiah, and Elijah, and Shemaiah, and Jehiel, and Uzziah.
Ezra 10 ends with a long list of names, and this verse gives five of them — priests from the family of Harim who had married foreign women. Such a list looks like dead weight, until you ask why God kept it, and why the priests come first.
The sons of Harim belong to the second group of priests named in this chapter.
First come the names of the priests who had fallen into sin, and they divide into two classes. In verse 18 there are "the sons of Jeshua the son of Jozadak and his brothers"; and in verses 20-22 other priests. The first group were held, it seems, to be the more guilty — and with reason. God in His grace had joined Jeshua with Zerubbabel as the leaders of His people in building His house. It shows that they had lost all conscience about the character of their sin. "The lips of a priest should guard knowledge, and people should seek instruction from his mouth, for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts." But in this case the priests had corrupted the people by their evil ways.
So what happened to the priests once their names were known?
Judgment was pronounced in love, without any being spared, and without favouritism, beginning with the priests. These, whose position made them more guilty than their brothers, "offered a ram of the flock, as a trespass-offering for their guilt" (v. 19). Having acknowledged their sin, they could offer no other sacrifice except a trespass offering, but it was important, because of their office, that they should publicly express their humiliation by their offering.
Commentators differ here. Dennett notes that Scripture records the ram and the pledge only of Jeshua's relatives, and gives the names of the rest — priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers, and Israel — one by one.
To modern ears this sounds like a private family matter. Ezra treated it as something far worse.
And Ezra stands up again, and now charges them plainly with their sin. "You have broken faith," he says, "and married foreign women." For an Israelite this was the great mark of apostasy, as far as the people were concerned. It was apostasy from God in taking a strange god. It was apostasy from the people in taking foreign wives. It was a complete giving up of their holy place of separateness to the Lord.
Behind each name in this list stands a home about to break up.
We know what this must have been. We know how the wives would appeal to their husbands' love. We know how the poor children would be on their knees, asking why their fathers should disown them. What a scene of grief and pleading this must have been! It was a time of agony for many a father and mother in Israel who had been found out in their sin. But the truth is that there is no real repentance without deep grief and pain.
These five names are otherwise unknown. So why does Scripture keep them?
This leads to our second observation — that nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will produce that record — either to magnify His grace, or (in the case of unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil."
The remedy here — wives and children sent away — belongs to the law. Writers point out that a Christian in a mixed marriage stands on different ground.
The law demanded that these wives and children be sent away, for they were unclean. Israel had to refuse them entry into the congregation. How different it is under grace! In 1 Corinthians 7:10 and following, we read what grace has done. An unbelieving husband is sanctified by the believing wife, and an unbelieving wife by the believing husband. Their children are not unclean, but holy.
- Named sin. Marrying the surrounding nations meant abandoning God and His people. It gave up Israel's whole place of separateness.
- Named men. The list starts with priests. Those nearest the leadership of God's house are held most guilty. Office raises responsibility; it does not shield.
- Named cost. Real repentance meant grief, tears and broken homes. There is no repentance without deep pain.
- Named record. These unknown names survive because God weighs and records every action. He will produce that record at the judgment seat of Christ.
- Named difference. The law sent the foreign wife and her children away. Grace answers otherwise: it sanctifies the unbelieving partner and counts the children holy.
And of the children of Pashhur Elioenai, Maaseiah, Ishmael, Nethaneel, Jozabad, and Elasah.
Ezra 10:22 names six men from the priestly family of Pashhur, among those who had married foreign wives. Why would God keep such a list at all, and why do priests stand at the head of it?
The men named here are priests. One writer notes that the record splits the guilty priests into two groups, and this verse belongs to the second:
First, the record gives the names of the priests who had fallen into sin, and it puts them in two groups. Verse 18 names "the sons of Jeshua the son of Jozadak and his brothers"; verses 20-22 name other priests. The first group seem to have been counted the more guilty, and with reason. God in His grace had set Jeshua alongside Zerubbabel as the leaders of His people in building His house. Their fall shows that they had lost all sense of how serious their sin was. "For the lips of a priest should guard knowledge, and people should seek instruction from his mouth, for he is the messenger of the Lord of hosts;" but in this case the priests had corrupted the people by their evil ways. But now they were dealt with: "They pledged themselves to put away their wives, and their guilt offering was a ram of the flock." Notice that this is said only of Jeshua's relatives. The names of the rest — priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers, and Israel — are given one by one.
The list does not stop with priests. It runs on through every rank of the people, and that is itself the lesson:
Verse 23 speaks of Levites, verse 24 of singers, then verses 25-43 of others among the people. So we are reminded of this. However great our blessings, no one among God's people is automatically safe from the enemy's tempting.
What good is a written record of men who failed? One writer links this list to a later reckoning:
This leads to our second observation — that nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or (in the case of unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. "We must all," says the apostle, "appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil."
The same names can be read another way. They record not only the failure, but what these men then did about it:
Notice too that the names given are the names of the men who sent the foreign wives away and offered a trespass offering. Taking those wives was to their discredit. Sending them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, as the result of the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
With the pledge to send the wives away came a ram. Commentators differ on which priests this is said of; one presses what such a sacrifice should do to a conscience:
When they gave their promise to put away their strange wives, they presented a ram as a trespass offering. Whenever we have sinned, we need to remember that Christ is "the propitiation for our sins." If we think seriously about the agony He suffered because of our sins, are we likely to slip back into sin so carelessly? So self-judgment should be real, and full.
Ezra had told the people to separate from the peoples of the land and from the wives — in that order. That order is deliberate:
Marrying the foreign wives was the sin, so you might expect the wives to be mentioned first. But what had led to these marriages? Mixing with the people of the land. That was the root of the trouble, so Ezra deals with it first. It is the same in every turning away from God: until you find the root, nothing is gained, and restoration is impossible.
Does a believer married to an unbeliever today have to do what these men did? One writer separates Ezra's situation from the Christian's:
So every one of these unequal yokes had to be broken, regardless of what either party felt about it. This was under law. Under grace today, if someone finds himself in an unequal yoke, the general principle is this. He should leave it if he can do so without being unfair to the other person... Marriage is not as simple as that, because Scripture tells the believer, "the wife should not separate from her husband."
- Named — Six men of Pashhur's house appear here because God keeps an exact record. Nothing escapes His eye; He weighs everything we do.
- Nearest — Those closest to God's house failed first. Priests, whose lips were to keep knowledge, had instead corrupted the people.
- No one exempt — Priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers, ordinary Israelites. However great the blessing, no one is safe from the enemy's tempting.
- Root — Ezra dealt with mixing with the peoples of the land first, then with the wives. Until the root is found, restoration is impossible.
- Restored — In the end this is a list of men put right. They pledged and brought a sacrifice, and their names now stand to their credit.
And of the Levites Jozabad, and Shimei, and Kelaiah (that is, Kelita), Pethahiah, Judah, and Eliezer.
Ezra 10:23 is one line in a long roll of names. Six Levites appear among the men who had married foreign wives, and one of them is recorded under both his names, Kelaiah and Kelita. The Levites served at God's house, yet they had failed with the rest. So why did God have their names written down?
The list runs from verse 18 to the end of the chapter, group by group. One writer counts each group and says whose record this really is.
Then follows the list of the men who had married the foreign women. God's record is again before us in these names. The names of the priests come first. Theirs was the greater responsibility and guilt… In all, seventeen priests were guilty, and six Levites. Verse 24 gives the guilty singers and gatekeepers by name. Then come eighty-six more names, of men who had all defiled themselves with foreign women.
Rank gave no one cover. Ezra and the chief fathers sat down and examined each case, then set down what they found.
They found more than a hundred men, four of them priests, who gave a pledge to send away their wives and offer the trespass offering required. Their names follow without respect of persons.
This record of names carries a lesson for every life, not only for these men.
This leads to our second observation — that nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records everything we do. One day He will bring it all out, either to magnify His grace, or (if we include unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment.
One writer shows what faithfulness asked of these men. The line they had drawn at the building site now had to be drawn inside their own homes.
They flatly refused to let the people of the land share in the work, when those people wanted to join them in building the temple. And finally they had to deal with their own wives, several of whom had borne them children. They had to put them away, and to separate themselves, at whatever cost, from everything that was not Israel. This is what marks out faithfulness in a position like theirs: a remnant that had come out from Babylon, busy restoring the temple and the service of God with what was still left to them.
The cost was not a formality. Another writer pictures the scene inside those homes.
We know how the wives would appeal to their husbands' love, and how the poor children would be on their knees to ask why their fathers should disown them. But the truth is that there is no real repentance without deep grief and pain. This is especially so where the sin is not that of a sinner only, but of the people of God. They have a deep sense that, as God's people, they have brought His name into such contempt, and this has gone on, it may be, for years.
The double name in this verse belongs to a man whose story does not stop here. Later records show where he turned up next.
Levite who had married a foreign wife. Ezra 10:23. He assisted Ezra in explaining the law and sealed the covenant.
It would be easy to read a chapter like this as a low point that excuses lower standards afterwards. One writer draws the opposite conclusion.
We are called to do His will in obedience to His word, and we must do it, whatever the cost. The danger comes from excusing slackness because of a state of ruin. A true heart would feel it a louder call to watch and pray.
- Named. God's record names six Levites, alongside seventeen priests. The men closest to His house were not passed over.
- Weighed. The names follow without respect of persons. God weighs and records everything we do.
- Costly. Faithfulness meant separating at whatever cost, even from wives who had borne them children. There is no real repentance without deep grief and pain.
- Restored. Kelaiah, also called Kelita, later helped Ezra explain the law and sealed the covenant. A name on this list was not the end of his usefulness.
- Watchful. A time of ruin is not a reason to relax the standard but a louder call to watch and pray.
And of the singers Eliashib. And of the doorkeepers Shallum, and Telem, and Uri.
The book of Ezra closes with a long list of names. These were men who had married women from the surrounding nations, and who then agreed to put that wrong right. Verse 24 moves past the priests and Levites to two more groups: one singer, and three men who guarded the temple doors.
Both groups had a set place in the service of God's house. One commentator says what each was there to do:
There were also singers (v. 41), who were there to give praise to God. And there were gatekeepers (v. 42), who were responsible to keep out everything that would interfere with the Lord's glory.
The two offices are tied together. One commentator shows how:
The singers gave the Lord His portion. Only the redeemed can sing the songs of Zion. So the gatekeepers must be faithful in carrying out their responsibilities, if the Lord is to have His portion. To let in those without divine qualifications is to admit those who cannot sing. If the gatekeepers are lax, the singers suffer loss. Where the gatekeepers are lax, worship dies.
Ezra did not begin with the marriages themselves. He began further back, and the order matters:
Often the soul deceives itself even by confession — confession that never judges the sin. Ezra knew the word and the ways of God too well to allow this. So there must be self-judgment and separation from the evil, as well as confession of it. The order of the separation is also most instructive — "from the people of the land, and from the foreign wives." Marrying the foreign wives had been the sin. So you might expect the wives to be named first. But what had led to these marriages? Association with the people of the land. This was the root of the trouble, and Ezra deals with it first. So it is with every departure from God. Until you find the root, you gain nothing, and restoration is impossible.
The list names priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers, and ordinary Israelites. It spares nobody. One writer sees more here than old record-keeping:
Nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or (in the case of unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil" (2 Corinthians 5:10).
The state of things was in ruins. One writer refuses to let that become an excuse:
Israel fell away from God, and then Judah did too. That is what led to the Gentile nations taking world power. But it did not cancel God's will for faithful men. Even less does the ruin of Christendom cancel it for the Christian now... We are called to do His will in obedience to His word; and this is binding, whatever the cost. The danger is claiming laxity because of a state of ruin. A true heart would feel it a louder call to watch and pray.
You could read the list as a roll of shame. Commentators read it the other way round:
Notice that the names given are of those who put away the foreign wives and offered a guilt offering. Taking these wives was to their discredit. Putting them away was to their credit. So their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, as the result of the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
Another writer looks at how the book signs off:
There had been such failure among the remnant — the minority who had returned to the place of God's choice. That was truly sad. But we should not miss this: the list contains the names of those who "offered a ram for their trespass" and "gave their hand" to put right what was wrong (v. 19). In other words, the book of Ezra ends with a list of restored people!
- Root — Ezra dealt with the company the people kept before he dealt with the marriages. That company had produced the marriages. Until you find the root, you gain nothing.
- Reach — the failure ran from the priests down to the singer and the gatekeepers. No office was too sacred to be touched.
- Ruin — the men meant to keep out whatever interfered with God's glory let it in. Lax gatekeepers cost the singers their song.
- Record — nothing escapes God's eye. He weighs and keeps every action. One day He will bring it out, either to display His grace or as ground for judgment.
- Restoration — these names stand there not as offenders only. They are men who gave their word and brought their offering. So the book ends on a list of the restored.
And of Israel; of the children of Parosh Ramiah, and Jizzijah, and Malchijah, and Mijamin, and Eleazar, and Malchijah, and Benaiah.
After the priests, Levites, singers and gatekeepers, the list of guilty men reaches the ordinary Israelites. It starts with the family of Parosh, and it raises a question: why does God write down the names of men who failed?
The record does not stop with the leaders. It works through every class, and the section opened by this verse is by far the largest.
Then follows the list of the men who had married the foreign women. God's record is again before us in these names. The names of the priests come first. Theirs was the greater responsibility and guilt. The sons of Joshua head the list... In all, seventeen priests were guilty, and six Levites. Verse 24 names the guilty singers and gatekeepers. Then follow eighty-six more names who had all defiled themselves with foreign women.
Trusted men ran the inquiry, and its findings were published without regard for anyone's standing.
Verse 16 is clear: not only Ezra but certain chief fathers, all of them named, were set apart and sat down to examine the matter. These carried out the task in order; whereas only four had stood up against this proposal. They found more than a hundred men, four of priestly rank, who promised to send away their wives and to offer the trespass-offering required. Their names follow, with no regard for anyone's rank.
Being named here is not only shame. One writer reads the list as a record of recovery.
Notice that the names given are of those who put away the foreign wives, and offered a trespass offering. It was certainly to their discredit that they had taken these wives. But putting them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, as the result of the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
The list names each man on his own. That fact opens a lesson far wider than Ezra's day.
The names of the rest — priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers, and Israel — are given one by one. This leads to our second observation: nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out either to magnify His grace, or (in the case of unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. The apostle says, "We must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Cor. 5:10)
The sons of Parosh named here are not the last word on that household. Another son of Parosh appears later in Nehemiah, and his story runs the other way.
In Nehemiah 3:25 we find Pedaiah the son of Parosh. Several of his brothers had taken foreign wives (Ezra 10:25). Later he is present at the reading of the covenant (Neh. 8:4), and served as one of the storekeepers over the storehouses of the Levites (Neh. 13:13).
Behind these names stand broken homes. Separation ran through everything these returned exiles did.
They refuse outright to let the people of the land share in the work, when those people wanted to join them in building the temple. And last of all, they have to put away their own wives, several of whom had borne them children. They have to separate themselves, at whatever cost, from all that was not Israel. This is what marks faithfulness in a position like theirs.
The same writer warns against the opposite mistake — treating ruin as an excuse: "The danger is from claiming laxity because of a state of ruin. A true heart would feel it a louder call to watch and pray." (The Bible Treasury)
- Recorded — God keeps a written record. This verse opens its longest part: priests first, because their responsibility was greater, then Levites, singers, gatekeepers, and eighty-six ordinary Israelites.
- Impartial — the list shows no regard for rank. More than a hundred men were found, four of them priests, and no one's position gave him cover.
- Restored — every man here put the wrong right. The list records failure dealt with, not failure left standing.
- Costly — separation reached as far as their own wives and children. That is what faithfulness looked like for people in their position.
- Reversible — sons of Parosh appear among the guilty, yet another son of Parosh later stands at the reading of the covenant and is trusted with the Levites' storehouses. A name on this list is not a family's verdict.
And of the children of Elam Mattaniah, Zechariah, and Jehiel, and Abdi, and Jeremoth, and Elijah.
Six men of the family of Elam are named here for marrying foreign wives. The third name, Jehiel, is the father of Shechaniah, the man who first called the nation to repentance — so why does God record names like these?
Shechaniah spoke up first and said there was still hope for Israel. This chapter calls him the son of Jehiel, of the sons of Elam. The list here shows what his words cost him.
Where there is confession of failure there is hope. Shechaniah put it well: "We have broken faith with our God… but even now there is hope for Israel." I do not think he took it lightly. In fact, his father was among the 'problem cases' (verse 26).
Shechaniah's own record appears clean, yet he says "we."
Shecaniah first responded to the appeal (verses 2-4). We do not hear that he was personally unfaithful, but it seems his own father was (compare verse 26). Yet he confesses, "We have broken faith." He calls for repentance shown in putting away the evil and its fruit, and he leaves Ezra to carry out the judgment.
A bare list of six names looks like filler. One writer reads it as proof that God keeps account.
This leads to our second observation — that nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records everything we do. One day He will bring it all out, either to magnify His grace, or (if we include unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. The apostle says: "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Cor. 5:10)
Marrying outside Israel was not treated as a social mistake. It struck at the nation's whole reason for existing.
And Ezra stands up again, and charges them plainly with their sin. "You have broken faith," he says, "and married foreign women." For an Israelite this was the great mark of apostasy, as far as the people were concerned. It meant turning away from God by taking a strange god, and turning away from the people by taking foreign wives. It was a complete giving up of their holy place of separateness to the Lord. "Now then," he says, "make confession to the LORD, the God of your fathers and do His will. Separate yourselves from the peoples of the land and from the foreign wives" (vv. 10-11).
One writer sets this demand of the law beside what grace does now:
The law demanded that Israel send these wives and children away. They were unclean, and the congregation of Israel had to refuse them. How different it is under grace! In 1 Corinthians 7:10 and following, we read what grace has done. The believing wife sanctifies her unbelieving husband, and the believing husband sanctifies his unbelieving wife. Their children are not unclean, but holy.
Each of these six men had a wife and children to send away.
We know what this must have been. The wives would appeal to their husbands' love. The poor children would be on their knees, asking why their fathers should disown them. It must have been a scene of grief and pleading. For many a father and mother in Israel, now found out in their sin, it was a time of agony. But the truth is that there is no real repentance without deep grief and pain. This is even more so when the sin belongs not to one sinner only, but to the people of God, who sense that, as His people, they have brought His name into contempt.
The book ends with names of offenders. Read from another angle, that ending is not defeat.
Ezra closes with a list of offenders (v.18-44). It was a matter that split families apart. It was sad indeed that the remnant failed like this! They were the minority who had returned to the place of God's choice. But on the other hand, we should not overlook something. This list contains the names of those who 'offered a ram for their trespass' and 'gave their hand' to put right what was wrong (v.19). In other words, the book of Ezra ends with a list of people who have been restored!
- Named. God writes down six men of Elam by name. He forgets nothing we do, and it all comes out before the judgment seat of Christ.
- Confessed. Shechaniah's own father, Jehiel, stands in this list. He still said "we," not "they" — real confession starts at home.
- Costly. Turning back meant broken homes and open grief. Real repentance always hurts.
- Different now. The law sent these wives and children away. Under grace, the believing partner sanctifies the unbelieving one, and the children are holy.
- Restored. The list of the guilty is also the list of men who offered a ram and gave their hand. Ezra closes on recovery, not shame.
And of the children of Zattu Elioenai, Eliashib, Mattaniah, and Jeremoth, and Zabad, and Aziza.
Six men of the family of Zattu are named near the end of Ezra, in a long list of returned exiles who had married foreign wives. Why did God keep their names at all — as a mark of their shame, or of their recovery?
Zattu himself is not a new name at this point in the book. He heads one of the families counted among those who came back from exile in Babylon.
Ancestor of some who returned from exile. Ezra 2:8; Neh. 7:13. Several of the family married foreign wives. Ezra 10:27.
So the failure did not come from outsiders. It came from inside the group that had returned. One writer points out where the sin was happening and who was doing it, then turns it on the reader.
It was not in Babylon, but in Judaea, that they were doing what the Canaanites did. It was not the people who were far away from Jerusalem. It was the people and the priests here who had slipped away from the will of the Lord... Let us then look earnestly to God, but let us remember this: all true blessing for us must begin with individual blessing, and the secret of individual blessing will always be found to have its root in self-judgment before God.
The writing down of names like Elioenai, Eliashib and Aziza is not filler. It carries a lesson about how God keeps account.
The names of the rest — priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers and Israel — are given one by one. This leads to our second observation: nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions, and one day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or (if we include unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. "We must all," says the apostle, "appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Cor. 5:10)
Rank made no difference to how this list was drawn up.
They found more than a hundred men, four of them priests, who gave a pledge to send away their wives and offer the trespass-offering required. Their names follow without respect of persons (verses 18-44).
One writer notes how often this pattern repeats in the families of God's servants.
It is a sad and humbling fact that many true and devoted servants of our Lord have had sons who have not followed in their father's footsteps. The recognition of this fact should lead us to be much in prayer for the families of those who serve the Lord Jesus.
Names on a list of wrongdoers sound like a permanent disgrace. Two writers read it the opposite way, because of what these men did next.
Notice that the names given are of those who sent away the foreign wives and offered a trespass offering. Taking these wives was to their discredit. Sending them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record.
We should not overlook that this list contains the names of those who "offered a ram for their trespass" and "gave their hand" to put right what was wrong (v.19). In other words, the book of Ezra ends with a list of people who have been restored!
The verse gives six names in one short line. Behind each name stood a household being broken up.
We know what a scene of grief and pleading this must have been. It was a time of agony for many a father and mother in Israel whose sin had been found out. But the truth is that there is no real repentance without deep grief and pain.
The way this wrong was put right mattered as much as the fact that it was put right.
Had it been done in an impulsive and reckless way, it might have brought further dishonour on the name of the Lord. This too may have something to say to us... Let us get out of it in a way that is worthy of the Lord whom we serve and obey. If, for instance, someone has to bear a loss, let us take the loss ourselves instead of putting it on others.
- Named — Six men of a returned family are written down by name. Nothing escapes God's eye; He weighs and records all we do.
- Named alike — The list runs from priests to ordinary families, without respect of persons. Rank bought no one a place off the page.
- Named at cost — Real repentance meant grief and pain at home. One writer says there is no true repentance without it.
- Named in order — They handled the matter with care, not recklessly, so that putting the wrong right would not dishonour God further.
- Named as restored — These men gave their pledge and brought their offering. So Ezra closes not with a blacklist but with a record of people brought back.
And of the children of Bebai Jehohanan, Hananiah, Zabbai, Athlai.
One line near the end of Ezra lists four men from the family of Bebai, and nothing more is said about them. Their names sit in a list of over a hundred men who had married foreign wives. Why would God keep such a list in Scripture?
The men of verse 28 are not singled out. Their names sit inside a long register, and one writer describes how Ezra and the leaders examined each case:
Verse 16 makes clear that not only Ezra but certain chief fathers — all of them named — were set apart, and they sat down to examine the matter. They carried out the task in order. Only four men had stood up against the proposal. More than a hundred were found, four of them priests. They promised to send away their wives and to offer the trespass offering required. Their names follow, and no one's position won him any favour.
One writer looks at how the chapter records each group, and at who keeps the record:
They gave their hands that they would put away their wives, and being guilty, they offered a ram of the flock for their trespass. Note that this is only said of the relatives of Jeshua. The record names the rest one by one — priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers, and Israel. This leads to our second observation: nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out again, either to magnify His grace, or, if we include unbelievers, as the ground of righteous judgment. "We must all," says the apostle, "appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Cor. 5:10)
There is a second way to read the same list. Commentators differ on whether every man named brought the offering, but one writer reads these names as a record of recovery rather than of sin:
Notice that the names given are of those who put away the foreign wives, and offered a trespass offering. Taking these wives was certainly to their discredit. But putting them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, as the result of the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
The name Bebai turns up more than once in the story of the return:
Two or three whose descendants returned from exile. Ezra 2:11; Ezra 8:11; Ezra 10:28; Neh. 7:16. And one who sealed the covenant. Neh. 10:15.
So the name appears among those who returned from exile, among those who travelled with Ezra, and among those who sealed the covenant. Here four men of the family have a wrong to put right.
The chapter also reports how the marriages ended. One writer finds a pattern there for anyone who needs to cut a tie:
First, we are told how carefully and in what good order they carried out the hard and painful work of putting away the foreign wives, and so freeing themselves from this worldly and sinful entanglement. If they had done it in an impulsive and reckless way, it might have brought further dishonour on the name of the Lord. This too may have a voice for us... If, for instance, it means that someone must bear a loss, let us accept the loss ourselves, instead of putting it on others.
One writer points to what makes such a change possible at all:
Still, here we see that the grace of God is equal to every difficulty. All that we need is a single eye, and that was all they needed too... In a day like this, faithfulness can never be separated from a willingness to see where we have been wrong. It means a readiness to see it, and a heart so subject to the word of God that it keeps searching and seeing.
- Recorded. Nothing escapes God's eye. He weighs and records every action, and one day He will bring it out, either to magnify His grace or as the ground of righteous judgment.
- Named. Ezra and chosen leaders examined every case, and over a hundred names follow. Rank shielded nobody.
- Restored. These names appear because these men put the wrong away. Taking the wives was their discredit; putting them away was their credit.
- Returned. The name Bebai also appears among those who returned from exile, those who travelled with Ezra, and those who sealed the covenant.
- Careful. They did the work in good order, not on impulse, so the Lord's name took no further dishonour. Where there is a loss, bear it yourself instead of putting it on others.
And of the children of Bani Meshullam, Malluch, and Adaiah, Jashub, and Sheal, and Ramoth.
Six men from one family stand here in a long list of Israelites who had married women from the surrounding nations. Why did God keep such a list at all, and why do these names still stand in Scripture?
The list is not a catalogue of offenders left in their sin. It records men who went through with the hard thing Ezra called for.
Notice that the names given are of those who sent away the foreign wives and offered a guilt offering. Taking these wives was to their discredit. Sending them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, through the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
Obeying cost each of these men his home and family.
Among the names given we find (Ezra 10) those who had married foreign wives. In faithfulness to God they broke the closest ties of all. They gave up wife and children, and God recorded their names in His book. He gives them honourable mention, because they preferred serving the LORD to the comforts of home.
The sons of Bani come after the priests, the Levites, the singers and the gatekeepers. That order shows how Ezra handled the judging.
Judgment was pronounced in love. No one was spared and no one was favoured, and it began with the priests. Their position made them more guilty than their brothers, and their "guilt offering was a ram of the flock" (v. 19)... Next come the Levites, the singers, the gatekeepers, and last of all those "of Israel". The list is a long one, but what grace! The restoration is carried through without any new division. It comes by humiliation, which becomes a source of decision and energy, and by the ministry of the Word.
Another writer notes the same evenhandedness in the way the whole register is set down: "Their names follow without respect of persons (vers. 18-44)."
Earlier in the chapter a few men opposed the whole plan. One of them bore the name Meshullam, and it appears again in this verse.
"Only Jonathan the son of Asahel and Jahzeiah the son of Tikvah opposed this, and Meshullam and Shabbethai the Levite supported them" (v. 15). What motives turned them to this path of opposition? We are not told. At the very most, we might suppose one thing. If one of them is the same Meshullam as the Levite of verse 29, then he had taken part in the evil himself. That would give him personal reasons for opposing the decision of the assembly. This opposition was completely against the mind of God. So what do those who have decided to purify themselves do? They do not exclude their brothers. They bear with them, and the self-will of these few needs no other judgment than the decisive action of the majority... Later we have the joy of seeing Shabbethai the Levite used to help the people understand the law, and then set over the outward business of the house of God (Neh. 8:7; Neh. 11:16).
after_note: DELETE
This link is a possibility, not a certainty. If it holds, a man who first fought the decision ends up among those who obeyed it.
Ezra's demand was not only about the marriages. It reached back to what made them possible in the first place.
Too often the soul deceives itself even by confession — confession without judging the sin... The order of the separation is also most instructive: "from the peoples of the land and from the foreign wives." Marrying the foreign wives had been the sin. So we might expect these wives to be mentioned first. But what had led to these marriages? Mixing with the peoples of the land. This was the root of the trouble, and so Ezra deals with it first. In every departure from God it is the same. Until you find the root, nothing is gained and restoration is impossible.
These men obeyed in a day of ruin. Ruin never lowers what God asks.
Israel turned away from God, and then Judah did too. That is what brought in the world-power of the Gentiles. Yet it did not cancel God's will for faithful men. Still less does the ruin of Christendom cancel it for the Christian now... We are called to do His will in obedience to His word, and we must do it whatever the cost. The danger is that we claim the right to be slack because everything is in ruins. A true heart would hear in the ruin a louder call to watch and pray.
- Named in sin. Six men of the family of Bani stand among those who had married outside Israel. The list hides no one. The search began with the priests, not with ordinary people.
- Named in obedience. These names stand there because the men gave up what they had taken. They are restored backsliders.
- Named with honour. They broke the dearest ties they had, and God recorded it. He honours men who put His service above home comfort.
- Named after resistance. A Meshullam may be the man who first opposed the whole plan. Those set on obedience bore with the objectors instead of throwing them out. God later used one objector to teach His law.
- Named for us. Real repentance cuts the root, not just the fruit — and a day of ruin is a louder call to obey, never a licence to relax.
And of the children of Pahath-Moab Adna, and Chelal, Benaiah, Maaseiah, Mattaniah, Bezaleel, and Binnui, and Manasseh.
Ezra 10:30 names eight men of one family — the sons of Pahath-moab — in the long list that closes the book. They were among the hundred and more who had married foreign wives and then gave them up, so why does Scripture keep their names?
A list like this could look like permanent public shaming. One writer reads it the other way: as a record of men brought back.
Notice that the names given are of those who sent away the foreign wives and offered a trespass offering. Taking those wives was to their discredit. Sending them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, through the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
Adna, Chelal, Benaiah and the rest are otherwise unknown men. Yet their deeds went on record, and that carries a lesson beyond them.
This leads to our second observation — that nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day they will be brought out, either to magnify His grace, or (if we include unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. "We must all," says the apostle, "appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Cor. 5:10)
The list moves from the priests to the Levites and the singers. Then it runs through family after family of ordinary Israelites, the sons of Pahath-moab among them.
Verse 23 speaks of Levites, verse 24 of singers, and verses 25-43 of others of the people. So we are reminded of this: however much we may be blessed, none of God's people are automatically exempt from being tested by the enemy's temptations.
The record itself shows the same evenness. Rank won nobody an exemption, and rank earned nobody extra blame.
More than a hundred were found, four of them priests, who promised to send away their wives and offer the trespass offering required. Their names follow, with no favour shown to anyone (verses 18-44).
These men did two things: they admitted the wrong and they ended it. Either half alone can be faked.
Sadly, someone can confess wrong-doing and still go on with it in more subtle, hidden ways. Someone can also see that a certain kind of wrong-doing does not pay, and give it up, without ever confessing that it was wrong. But when conviction of sin is genuine, he first confesses the sin, and then gives it up. Proverbs 28:13 clearly points to this.
Their promise came with a sacrifice. That sacrifice points beyond itself.
When they promised to send away their foreign wives, they presented a ram as a trespass offering. Whenever we have been guilty of any sin, we need to remember that Christ is "the propitiation for our sins" (1 Jn.2:1-2). If we think seriously about the agony He suffered because of our sins, are we likely to slip carelessly back into sin again? So self-judgment should be real, and full.
Propitiation means the sacrifice that satisfies God concerning sin.
The chapter shows not only that the entanglement was cut, but how they cut it.
First, we are told how carefully and in what good order they did the difficult and distressing work of sending away the foreign wives, and so freed themselves from this worldly and sinful entanglement. Had they done it in an impulsive and reckless way, it might have brought further dishonour on the name of the Lord. This too may have a voice for us. As we grow in grace, and our understanding of the will of God grows wider, we may become aware that something we thought little of is really a spiritual entanglement and hindrance. Let us get out of it in a way that is worthy of the Lord whom we serve and obey. If, for instance, it means a loss somewhere, let us take the loss ourselves, instead of putting it on others.
- Recorded — nothing escapes God's eye. He weighs and records every action, to be brought out one day, either to magnify His grace or as the ground of righteous judgment.
- Exposed — from priests down to ordinary families, no one is exempt from the enemy's testing. The names follow with no favour shown to anyone.
- Confessed — genuine conviction shows itself twice over: first owning the sin, then leaving it. Without both, the conviction is not genuine.
- Covered — a ram was offered for their guilt. Commentators point from it to Christ, the propitiation for our sins, so that self-judgment becomes real and full.
- Credited — the list survives because these men put the evil away. They stand in Scripture as restored. How they got free — with care, in good order, bearing the loss themselves — is the model for us.
And the children of Harim Eliezer, Jishijah, Malchijah, Shemaiah, Simeon,
Ezra's book closes with a register, not a sermon — family by family, the men who had married foreign wives and then agreed to send them away. This verse sits among the ordinary Israelites, not the priests, and it raises one question: why would God keep such a list?
One writer notes how many men were involved, and how the register handles rank:
More than a hundred were found, four of priestly rank, who gave a pledge to send away their wives and to offer the trespass offering required. Their names follow, with no favouritism.
Five men of one family are named here, and the list survives because God chose to keep it. One writer draws a principle from that:
The names of the rest — priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers, and Israel — are given one by one. This leads to a second observation: nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records everything we do. One day He will produce it, either to magnify His grace, or (in the case of unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Corinthians 5:10)
The men in this roll are not simply on record as offenders. Their names stand there because of what they gave up:
Among the names given we find (Ezra 10) those who had married foreign wives. In faithfulness to God they broke the tenderest ties, giving up wife and children; and their names are recorded in the book of God. They receive honourable mention, for they preferred the service of the Lord to the warmth of home.
Behind each name stood a household. One writer pictures the scene, then draws a rule from it:
We know how the wives would appeal to their husbands' love. We know how the poor children would be on their knees, asking why their fathers should disown them. What a scene of grief and pleading this must have been. What a time of agony for many a father and mother in Israel who had been found out in their sin. But the truth is that there is no real repentance without deep grief and pain.
Ezra told the people to separate from the peoples of the land and from the foreign wives — in that order. One writer explains why that order matters:
Too often the soul deceives itself even by confession — confession without judging the sin. Ezra knew the word and the ways of God too well to allow that. There must be self-judgment and separation from the evil, as well as confession of it. The order of the separation is also instructive: "from the peoples of the land and from the foreign wives." The sin had been marrying the foreign wives, so you might expect the wives to come first. But what had led to these marriages? Association with the people of the land. This was the root of the mischief, and Ezra deals first with it. So it is in every departure from God: until you find the root, nothing is gained, and restoration is impossible.
The list looks like a catalogue of failure. One writer reads it the other way:
Notice that the names given are of those who put away the foreign wives and offered a trespass offering. Taking these wives was certainly to their discredit. But putting them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, as the result of the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
The same writer applies the way that work was done to anyone who finds a tie they must break:
Had it been done in an impulsive and reckless way, it might have brought further dishonour on the name of the Lord. This too may have a voice for us. As we grow in grace and understand the will of God better, we may see that something we thought little of is truly a spiritual entanglement and hindrance. Let us get out of it in a way that is worthy of the Lord whom we serve and obey. If, for instance, someone must bear a loss, let us take the loss ourselves instead of putting it on others.
- Recorded — the roll shows that God weighs and writes down what people do, and this line of five names is part of that record.
- Root — Ezra deals first with the wrong company, then with the wrong marriages, because failure is never cured until its source is found.
- Cost — these men broke the dearest ties they had, and one writer insists there is no real repentance without that grief.
- Order — they untangled the wrong ties carefully, not recklessly, so the correction itself would not dishonour God.
- Restored — the list that exposes the sin also names the men who pledged and obeyed, so the book closes with the restored.
Benjamin, Malluch, Shemariah.
This verse is one line in a long list of names. Benjamin, Malluch and Shemariah were sons of Harim, and each had married a woman from the surrounding nations. Why would God record failure name by name, and what did being named mean for these men?
These three names sit inside a much longer list. One writer sums it up:
More than a hundred were found, four of priestly rank, who gave a pledge to send away their wives and offer the trespass offering required. Their names follow without respect of persons (verses 18-44).
The list moves through one group after another. Another writer draws a warning from that:
Levites are spoken of in verse 23, and singers in verse 24, then others of the people in verses 25-43. So we are reminded of this: however richly we may be blessed, none of God's people are automatically spared the enemy's temptations.
Why record the guilty by name? One writer answers:
This leads to our second observation — that nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or (in the case of unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil" (2 Corinthians 5:10).
The same names can be read the other way round. These men broke with the wrong they had done:
Notice that the names given are the names of men who put away the foreign wives and offered a trespass offering. Taking these wives was to their discredit. But putting them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, as the result of the faithful ministry and action of Ezra. He had indeed been "a ready scribe in the law of Moses."
Earlier in the chapter, Ezra told the people to separate from the peoples of the land and from the foreign wives — in that order. One writer finds the whole method of recovery there:
Too often the soul deceives itself even by confession — confession without judging the sin. Ezra knew the word and the ways of God too well to allow this. So there must be self-judgment and separation from the evil, as well as confession of it. The order of the separation is also very instructive — "from the peoples of the land and from the foreign wives." Marrying the foreign wives had been the sin. So you might expect the wives to be named first. But what had led to these marriages? Association with the peoples of the land. This was the root of the trouble, and Ezra deals with it first. So it is in every turning away from God. Until we find the root, nothing is gained and restoration is impossible.
One writer turns the care they took into practical counsel:
First, we are told how carefully and in what good order they did the hard and painful work of putting away the foreign wives. That is how they freed themselves from this worldly and sinful entanglement. Had it been done in an impulsive and reckless way, it might have brought further dishonour on the name of the Lord. This too may have a voice for us. As we grow in grace, we understand the will of God better. Then we may see that something we thought little of is truly a spiritual entanglement and hindrance. Let us get out of it in a way that is worthy of the Lord whom we serve and obey. If, for instance, someone must bear a loss, let us take the loss ourselves instead of putting it on others.
Does this chapter tell believers today to send a wife or husband away? One writer is clear:
Such an action certainly shows the seriousness of the evil of sinful associations. We must not make it less serious than it is. Yet in our day, under grace, we cannot demand that wives be put away, even if they are not saved. The nations Israel was mixing with worshipped demons. That is why God had completely forbidden any marriage with them. Believers today are not under such a law, though they are told, "Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers" (2 Corinthians 6:14). If they disobey this scripture, they are not told to put away the unbeliever. Instead, "the wife should not separate from her husband" (1 Corinthians 7:10).
- Named — the list runs from priests down to ordinary families, with no respect of persons.
- Exposed — nothing escapes God's eye. He weighs and records all we do.
- Rooted — the marriages grew out of mixing with the peoples of the land. Until the root is found, restoration is impossible.
- Restored — these names stand in the record for putting the foreign wives away. They are backsliders restored.
- Applied — sinful associations are still serious. But under grace, a believer is not told to send away an unbelieving husband or wife.
Of the children of Hashum Mattenai, Mattattah, Zabad, Eliphelet, Jeremai, Manasseh, Shimei.
Ezra 10:33 is one line in a long list at the end of the book. Seven men from one family are named here, among more than a hundred who had married women from the surrounding nations. The list raises a question. Why does Scripture write down who failed, and what changed for these men once it did?
These men come late in a list that opens with the priests. One writer treats the whole roll as God's own record:
They began the agreed examination on the first day of the first month — the time of the New Year, the new beginning. Then follows the list of the men who had married the foreign women. God's record is again before us in these names. The names of the priests come first. Theirs was the greater responsibility and guilt. In all, seventeen priests were guilty, and six Levites... Then follow eighty-six more names of men who had all defiled themselves with foreign women.
The list runs from priests to singers to ordinary families like this one. That spread carries a warning:
Levites are spoken of in verse 23, and singers in verse 24, then others of the people in verses 25-43. So we are reminded that, however much we may be blessed, no one among God's people is automatically safe from the enemy's temptations.
The list does more than expose failure. Commentators read these names as a record of recovery, not only of sin:
Notice that the names given are of those who put away the foreign wives, and offered a trespass offering. It was to their discredit that they had taken these wives. But putting them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, as the result of the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
What they gave up was their own family, and the record treats that as honourable:
Among the names given we find those who had married foreign wives. In faithfulness to God they broke the tenderest ties and gave up wife and children. The book of God records their names. It mentions them with honour, for they preferred the service of the Lord to the affections of home. It speaks even more to believers now. If they as Israelites were to be separate from the nations, so in a far higher sense the church of God ought to be separate from the world.
These names cover a painful scene. One writer will not let us read the list as paperwork:
We know what this must be. We know how the wives would appeal to their husbands' love. We know how the poor children would be on their knees, asking why their fathers should disown them. We know what a scene of grief and pleading this must have been. It was a time of agony for many a father and mother in Israel whose sin had come to light. But the truth is that there is no real repentance without deep grief and pain.
Ezra told the people to separate from two things, and the order matters:
Too often the soul deceives itself even by confession — confession without judging the sin. Ezra knew the word and the ways of God too well to allow this. There had to be self-judgment and separation from the evil, as well as confession of it. The order of the separation is most instructive too — "from the peoples of the land and from the foreign women." Since marrying the foreign wives had been the sin, we might expect those marriages to be mentioned first. But what had led to these marriages? Association with the people of the land. This was the root of the mischief, and Ezra deals first with it. So it is in every departure from God. Until the root is found, nothing is gained, and restoration is impossible.
The same writer draws one more lesson from the names:
Nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or, in the case of unbelievers, as the ground of righteous judgment. "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil."
- Root — The marriages were the fruit; mixing with the peoples of the land was the root. Until the root is found, nothing is gained and restoration is impossible.
- Confession — Confession that does not judge the sin deceives the soul. Ezra required both owning the wrong and separating from it.
- Cost — They gave up wife and children. There is no real repentance without deep grief and pain. In a far higher sense, God's people now ought to be separate from the world.
- Credit — Taking the wives was to their discredit. Putting them away was to their credit. So these names stand in the record as backsliders restored.
- Record — Nothing escapes God's eye. He weighs and records every action, and will bring it out one day — to magnify His grace, or as the ground of righteous judgment.
Of the sons of Bani Maadai, Amram, and Uel,
Verse 34 is a single line in a long roll of names — one family group among many in the register that closes the book of Ezra. These men had married women from the surrounding nations. So why did God keep their names at all?
The register is not a blacklist. The men in it had already dealt with their sin. One writer points to what the record marks:
Notice that the names given are of those who sent away the foreign wives and offered a trespass offering. Taking these wives was certainly to their discredit. But sending them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, as the result of the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
By the time the list reaches the sons of Bani, it has already passed through priests, Levites and singers. The spread of the failure is itself the lesson:
Levites are spoken of in verse 23, and singers in verse 24, then others of the people in verses 25-43. So we are reminded of this. However greatly we may be blessed, none of God's people are automatically safe from being tested by the enemy's seductions.
Ezra and the family heads sat down to examine every case one by one, over two months. Rank gave nobody an exemption from being written down:
They found more than a hundred men, four of them priests, who pledged to send away their wives and to offer the trespass offering required. Their names follow, with no favour shown to anyone.
Ezra named two things to separate from, and the order surprises: the peoples of the land first, the wives second.
Too often the soul deceives itself even by confession — confession without judging the sin. … The order of the separation is also very instructive: "from the peoples of the land and from the foreign wives." Marrying the foreign wives had been the sin, so you might expect those wives to be mentioned first. But what had led to these marriages? Association with the people of the land. This was the root of the mischief, and Ezra deals first with it. It is the same in every departure from God. Until you find the root, nothing is gained and restoration is impossible.
A list of obscure names can look like filler. The writer above draws a second lesson from the very fact that it exists:
The names of the rest — priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers and Israel — are given one by one. This leads to our second observation — that nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or (if we include unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. The apostle says, "We must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Cor. 5:10)
One writer marks carefully what has changed for Christians today:
Such an action certainly shows the seriousness of the evil of sinful associations. We must not make light of this. Yet in our day, under grace, we cannot demand that wives be sent away, even when they are not saved. The nations Israel was mixing with were demon worshippers, so God had completely forbidden any marriages with them. Believers today are not under such a law, though they are told, "Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers" (2 Cor. 6:14). If they disobey this scripture, they are not told to put away the unbeliever. Rather, "the wife should not separate from her husband" (1 Cor. 7:10), though "if the unbelieving partner desires to separate, let it be so" (1 Cor. 7:15). Once the marriage is consummated, the believer is not free before God to leave it, except when the partner has been unfaithful (Matthew 19:9). Today a believer who marries an unbeliever must learn the painful results of this disobedience by experience, instead of being spared them.
- Named. These men are named because they put the wrong away. The record marks their repentance, not just their failure.
- Everyone. The list runs from priests through Levites and singers to ordinary Israelites. Being blessed makes no one immune to the enemy's pull.
- Root. Ezra named the peoples of the land first and the wives second. The association came before the marriage. Until you find the root, restoration is impossible.
- Recorded. Nothing escapes God's eye; every action is weighed and kept, to be brought out one day at the judgment seat of Christ.
- Today. The warning against unequal yokes still stands. But under grace a believer is not told to send away an unbelieving husband or wife. The painful results have to be lived through.
Benaiah, Bediah, Cheluhu,
reason: re-quotes the featured verse word-for-word; very-hard opening sentence
The list runs in order of responsibility. Verse 35 comes well down it, among ordinary people, not the temple officials. One writer traces that order and the warning in it:
Verse 23 speaks of Levites, verse 24 of singers, and verses 25-43 of others of the people. So we are reminded of this: however much we may be blessed, none of God's people are automatically safe from the enemy's attempts to seduce them.
These were not just unwise marriages. Ezra named the sin, and named what it cost Israel:
And Ezra stands up again, and now charges them plainly with their sin. "You have trespassed," he says, "and married foreign women." For an Israelite this was the great mark of apostasy, as far as the people were concerned. It was turning away from God by taking a foreign god, and turning away from the people by taking foreign wives. It was a complete giving up of their holy place of separateness to the Lord.
Confession alone was not enough. Ezra's command named the wider association before the marriages, and that order matters:
Too often the soul deceives itself even by confession — confession without judging the sin. Ezra knew the word and the ways of God far too well to allow this. So there must be self-judgment and separation from the evil, as well as confession of it. The order of the separation is also most instructive — "from the peoples of the land and from the foreign wives." Marrying the foreign wives had been the sin, so you might expect these to be named first. But what had led to these marriages? Association with the people of the land. This was the root of the mischief, and Ezra deals first with it. So in every departure from God, nothing is gained until the root is found, and restoration is impossible.
Why record the names of men who had failed? The list itself shows how God treats what we do:
Nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or (in the case of unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. The apostle says, "We must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Cor. 5:10)
Yet the record is not only a charge sheet. These men are named for how the matter ended:
Notice that the names given are of those who put away the foreign wives and offered a trespass offering. Taking these wives was to their discredit. But putting them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, as the result of the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
Obedience here was costly. One writer counts that cost, and carries it over to believers now:
Among the names given in Ezra 10 we find those who had married foreign wives. In faithfulness to God they broke the dearest ties of all. They gave up wife and children, and God has recorded their names in His book. They receive honourable mention, for they preferred the service of the Lord to the comforts of home... To give up all in entire separation to God is not only a privilege, but our "spiritual worship." (Rom. 12:1)
Commentators differ on how far this carries over to us. One writer presses how such a tangle should be undone:
If it had been done in an impulsive and reckless way, it might have brought further dishonour on the name of the Lord... If, for instance, it means a loss for someone, let us accept the loss ourselves, instead of putting it on others.
Another writer marks the difference between then and now:
So every one of these unequal yokes had to be broken... This was under law... for Scripture tells the believer, "the wife should not separate from her husband" (1 Cor. 7:10).
- Nobody exempt. Benaiah, Bedeiah and Cheluhi are ordinary men, named after the priests, Levites and singers. No amount of blessing puts anyone beyond testing.
- Root first. The marriages grew out of mixing with the surrounding peoples. Find the root, or nothing is gained and no one is restored.
- Confession plus self-judgment. A soul can deceive itself by confessing sin without judging it; Ezra required both, and action as well.
- Recorded, not overlooked. God misses nothing. He weighs every action and will one day bring it out, either to magnify His grace or as ground for judgment.
- Credit, not shame. Taking the wives shamed them. Putting them away is why their names stand: backsliders restored, and honoured for choosing God over home.
Vaniah, Meremoth, Eliashib,
Ezra's book ends with a roll of names, not a sermon. This verse gives three more of them: men who had married foreign wives and now stand named in God's record. Why would Scripture preserve a list of failures, and what does it mean that these men appear here at all?
Every offender here appears by name. Private sin turned out not to be private, and one commentator draws the lesson:
This leads to our second observation — that nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or (if we include unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. As the apostle says, "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Cor. 5:10)
The names in this verse come near the end of the list, among ordinary families. The roll began at the top, and one writer walks through its order:
The examination of the whole matter, as agreed, began on the first day of the first month (Nisan, our March–April). That was the time of the New Year, the new beginning set out in Exodus 12:1. Then comes the list of the men who had married the foreign women. The names of the priests come first. Theirs was the greater responsibility and guilt. ... In all, seventeen priests were guilty, and six Levites. Verse 24 gives the guilty singers and porters by name. Then follow eighty-six more names of men who had all defiled themselves with foreign women.
Another writer points out who had led the people astray — the very men meant to teach them:
It shows that they had completely lost any conscience about the character of their sin. "For the lips of a priest should guard knowledge, and people should seek instruction from his mouth, for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts" — but in this case the priests had corrupted the people by their evil ways.
This list reads like a register of shame. It also reads the other way. The record holds not only the marriages but the undoing of them:
Notice that the names given are the names of men who put away the foreign wives and offered a trespass offering. Taking these wives was certainly to their discredit. But putting them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, as the result of the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
Behind each name stood a household. One writer pictures the scenes the bare list hides, and then says what repentance costs:
We know what this must have been like. The wives would appeal to their husbands' love. The poor children would be on their knees, asking why their fathers should disown them. It must have been a scene of grief and pleading — a time of agony for many a father and mother in Israel caught out in their sin. But the truth is that there is no real repentance without deep grief and pain.
God kept these names for another reason too. The record holds honour as well as offence:
Among the names given in Ezra 10 we find those who had married foreign wives. In faithfulness to God they broke the tenderest ties, giving up wife and children; and God records their names in His book. He gives them honourable mention, for they preferred the service of the LORD to the comforts of home.
A ruined situation looks like an excuse for a lower standard. One writer says the opposite:
Israel fell away, and then Judah, and the Gentile empires took power. Yet none of that cancelled God's will for faithful men. Still less does the ruin of the Christian world cancel it for the Christian now... We are called to do His will in obedience to His word, and we must do it whatever the cost. The danger lies in claiming freedom to be slack because everything is in ruins. A true heart would hear in that ruin a louder call to watch and pray.
- Named — Nothing escapes God's eye. He weighs and records every action, and will bring it out one day, either to magnify His grace or as the ground of righteous judgment.
- Named from the top — The roll begins with the priests. Their responsibility and guilt were greater, and their example had corrupted the people. Only later does the list reach ordinary families like the three men named here.
- Named at a cost — Behind each name stood pleading wives and children. There is no real repentance without deep grief and pain.
- Named with honour — These men broke the tenderest ties. God gave them honourable mention, because they preferred His service to the comforts of home.
- Named as restored — Taking the wives was to their discredit; putting them away was to their credit. They are backsliders recovered, and a day of ruin is the last excuse for a lower standard.
Mattaniah, Mattenai, and Jaasai,
Three names — Mattaniah, Mattenai and Jaasu — sit deep inside a list of men who had married foreign wives, far below the priests and Levites at its head. Why would God write down names this ordinary?
The list works down through the ranks of the returned people. These three names fall in its last stretch.
The list names Levites in verse 23, singers in verse 24, then others of the people in verses 25-43. So we are reminded of this. However greatly we may be blessed, the enemy can try to seduce any of God's people.
Ezra did not start with the wives. He started one step further back.
Too often the soul deceives itself even by confession — confession without judging the sin. Ezra knew the word and the ways of God too well to allow that. There had to be self-judgment and separation from the evil, as well as confession of it. The order of the separation is also very instructive — "from the people of the land and from the foreign wives." Marrying the foreign wives had been the sin, so you might expect the wives to come first. But what had led to these marriages? Association with the people of the land. This was the root of the mischief, and Ezra deals first with it. It is the same in every departure from God. Until you find the root, you gain nothing, and restoration is impossible.
A modern reader skims lists like this. The fact that God wrote them down is itself the lesson.
Nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or — in the case of unbelievers — as the ground of righteous judgment. The apostle says, "We must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Cor. 5:10)
There is a second way to read the same list. These men did not only sin — they also obeyed at great cost.
Among the names given we find (Ezra 10) those who had married foreign wives. To stay faithful to God they broke the dearest ties of all and gave up wife and children. God recorded their names in His book. Honourable mention is made of them, for they preferred the service of the Lord to the endearments of home... They were Israelites, and they had to stay separate from the other nations. In a far higher sense, the church of God ought to be separate from the world.
These names came out of a slow examination, handled case by case.
On the first day of the tenth month, Ezra and the heads of the families "sat down… to examine the matter." These were men who knew the Word well, wise men whom the people respected. The evil was plain. It was not a question of whether it existed. Each case needed its own discernment and judgment according to God. Three full months were enough to set this huge difficulty in order (vv. 16, 17). They pronounced judgment in love. They spared no one and showed no favouritism, and they began with the priests... The list is a long one, but what grace! The restoration happens without any new break. It comes through humbling that becomes a source of decision and energy, and through the ministry of the Word.
One writer asks how we should get out of an entanglement once we see it:
Had it been done in an impulsive and reckless way, it might have brought further dishonour on the name of the Lord... As we grow in grace and understand God's will better, we may see that something we thought little of is really a spiritual entanglement and hindrance. Let us get out of it in a way that is worthy of the Lord whom we serve and obey. If getting out of it costs someone a loss, let us take that loss ourselves instead of putting it on others.
Another marks a sharp limit where marriage itself is concerned:
Every one of these unequal yokes had to be broken, whatever either party felt about it. This was under law. Under grace today, the general principle for someone in an unequal yoke is to leave it if he can do so without injustice to the other party... Marriage is not as simple as that, for Scripture tells the believer, "the wife should not separate from her husband" (1 Cor. 7:10).
- Root — Ezra dealt with the friendship with the people of the land first, then the marriages. Miss the root, and you gain nothing.
- Reach — the list runs from priests down through Levites, singers and ordinary families. No rank is safe from the enemy.
- Record — nothing escapes God's eye. He weighs and writes down every action, and will bring it out at the judgment seat of Christ.
- Cost — these men gave up wife and children, and God gave them honourable mention for putting His service before their own homes.
- Repair — case by case, in love, with no favourites, and without a fresh break.
and Bani, and Binnui, Shimei,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
and Shelemiah, and Nathan, and Adaiah,
Ezra 10:39 gives three more names: Shelemiah, Nathan and Adaiah. They stand near the end of a long list of returned exiles who had married foreign wives. A bare list of names raises two questions. Why did God preserve them? And what was so serious about what these men had done?
Every name here belongs to a man who had taken a foreign wife. One commentator explains what that meant for an Israelite:
Ezra stands up again, and now charges them plainly with their sin. "You have transgressed," he says, "and have taken foreign wives." As far as the people were concerned, this was the great mark of apostasy for an Israelite. It was apostasy from God, in taking a strange god; and apostasy from the people, in taking foreign wives. It was a complete giving up of their holy place of separateness to the Lord.
These men were not anonymous. Each one is named, and the record still stands thousands of years later. That record points to a larger one:
The names of the rest — priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers and Israel — are given one by one. This leads to a further observation: nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out again, either to magnify His grace, or — if we include unbelievers — as the ground of righteous judgment. The apostle says, "We must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Cor. 5:10)
The list also shows no favouritism. Rank gave nobody cover, and the number involved was large:
And more than a hundred were found, four of priestly rank, who gave their pledge to send away their wives and offer the trespass offering required. Their names follow without respect of persons (vv. 18-44).
The register runs in order of responsibility, starting at the top of the nation. Verse 39 sits near the end, among the ordinary people:
Then follows the list of the men who had married the strange women. God's record is again before us in these names. The names of the priests come first. Theirs was the greater responsibility and guilt. The sons of Joshua head the list. What an illustration of what man is! The sons of the high priest, along with Zerubbabel, had been great instruments of the Lord to lead the first captives home. Yet they corrupted themselves with these women. ... In all, seventeen priests were guilty, and six Levites. The guilty singers and gatekeepers are given by name in verse 24. Then follow eighty-six more names who had all defiled themselves by strange women.
The list runs from priests down to ordinary Israelites. That carries its own warning:
Levites are spoken of in verse 23, and singers in verse 24, then others of the people in verses 25-43. So we are reminded of this: however great our blessings, none of God's people are automatically free from being tested by the enemy's temptations.
Being named on this list meant action. In some cases the break tore through a household that already had children:
They flatly refuse any share in the work to the people of the land who wished to join them in building the temple. And last of all, they have to deal with their own wives, several of whom had borne them children. They have to put them away, and to separate themselves, at whatever cost, from all that was not Israel. It is this which marks out faithfulness in a position like theirs.
Commentators note that this is not the rule for Christians today:
So every one of these unequal yokes had to be broken, whatever either party felt about it. This was under law. Under grace today, suppose someone finds himself in an unequal yoke. The general principle is that he should leave it if he can do so without injustice toward the other party. Suppose it is a business yoke. If a believer has committed himself to a contract, he may find the only right way to break the contract is to buy himself out of it, which he should do if possible. It is not this simple in marriage, for Scripture tells the believer, "the wife should not separate from her husband" (1 Cor. 7:10). ... How thankful we ought to be that we are living under grace rather than under law!
- Record. God writes names down. Shelemiah, Nathan and Adaiah are still remembered. Nothing a person does escapes His eye, and one day He will bring all of it out.
- Reach. The record starts with priests and runs down to ordinary Israelites. No rank was safe from the enemy's pull.
- Root. These marriages were apostasy — turning from God to a strange god, and turning from His people by marrying outside them.
- Cost. Faithfulness meant breaking ties that had already produced children. It was obedience at whatever cost.
- Contrast. Law demanded this break in Ezra's day. Grace takes another way now: a believer married to an unbeliever is told not to separate.
Machnadbai, Shashai, Sharai,
This verse is only three names, near the end of a chapter about men who had married wives from the surrounding nations and then agreed to send them away. So why does God write down names like these at all?
Edward Dennett notes that the offenders are listed one by one, and draws a conclusion that reaches past Ezra's day:
The names of the rest — priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers and Israel — are given one by one. This leads to our second observation: nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or, in the case of unbelievers, as the ground of righteous judgment.
after_note: DELETE "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Corinthians 5:10)
A list like this looks like a record of shame. Michael Hardt reads it the other way round:
How sad, you may say, that a book of revival should end on such a sombre note! Ezra closes with a list of offenders (v.18-44). It was sad that such failure had happened among the remnant, the minority who had returned to the place of God's choice. But we should not overlook that this list contains the names of those who "offered a ram for their trespass" and "gave their hand" to put right that which was wrong (v.19). In other words, the book of Ezra ends with a list of people who have been restored!
F. B. Hole traces the same list back to Ezra's ministry:
Notice that the names given are of those who put away the foreign wives and offered a trespass offering. It was to their discredit that they had taken these wives, but putting them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, as the result of the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
The chapter lists offenders by rank. The men of this verse are in the last and largest group — ordinary Israelites. Leslie Grant reads that spread as a warning:
The list names Levites in verse 23, singers in verse 24, then others of the people in verses 25-43. So we are reminded that, however greatly we may be blessed, the enemy's seductions can test any one of God's people.
Ezra and the heads of families sat down and worked through the cases one at a time:
Verse 16 is clear that not only Ezra but certain heads of families, all of them named, were set apart and sat down to examine the matter. They carried out the task in order. More than a hundred men were found, four of them priests, who promised to send away their wives and offer the trespass offering required. Their names follow with no favouritism (verses 18-44).
Hole warns that even a right step, taken recklessly, can do damage:
If they had done it in an impulsive, reckless way, it might have brought further dishonour on the name of the Lord. This may have something to say to us too. As we grow in grace and our understanding of God's will grows, we may see that something we once thought little of is a real spiritual entanglement and hindrance. Let us get out of it in a way that is worthy of the Lord whom we serve and obey. If, for instance, someone has to take a loss, let us take it ourselves instead of putting it on others.
Commentators differ on how far this chapter reaches today. Grant draws a line between Ezra's day and the Christian's:
So every one of these unequal yokes had to be broken, whatever either party felt about it. This was under law. Under grace today, if one should find himself in an unequal yoke, the general principle is that he should leave it if he can do so without injustice toward the other party... It is not this simple in marriage, for Scripture tells the believer, "the wife should not separate from her husband" (1 Corinthians 7:10).
Others draw from the chapter a duty that a time of decline cannot soften:
We are called to do His will in obedience to His word, and this is binding, whatever the cost. The danger is in claiming that a state of ruin allows us to be slack.
- Named. God writes down three obscure men by name. Nothing escapes His eye; He weighs and records every action.
- Named as guilty. These men had married outside God's people. The same failure reached priests, Levites, singers and ordinary Israelites, so no blessing makes anyone exempt.
- Named without favour. Responsible men examined every case one at a time, and rank made no difference.
- Named as restored. These men gave their hand and brought the offering. A book of revival ends with a register of recovered people.
- Named as an example. Untangle what is wrong in a way worthy of the Lord: take the loss yourself rather than pushing it onto someone else.
Azareel, and Shelemiah, Shemariah,
Verse 41 adds three more names near the end of a long list. Every man on that list had married a foreign wife and then agreed to send her away. So why did God keep a record of ordinary names tied to a shameful failure?
The names come at the end of a long inquiry. One writer notes how many men were involved, and how even-handed the record is:
More than a hundred were found, four of priestly rank, who gave pledge to send away their wives and offer the trespass-offering required. Their names follow without respect of persons (vv. 18-44).
The list is not only a record of shame. Every man on it acted, and that is why he is named:
Notice that the names given are those of the men who sent away the foreign wives and offered a trespass offering. Taking these wives was to their discredit. Sending them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, as the result of the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
Behind each name stands a household broken up. Another writer reads the list as a record of honour, and draws the line straight to believers now:
To be faithful to God they broke the dearest ties of all. They gave up wife and children, and God records their names in His book. He mentions them with honour, for they chose the service of the LORD over the comforts of home... If they as Israelites were to be separate from the nations, then in a far higher sense the church of God should be separate from the world.
A list like this also says something about God:
This leads to our second observation — that nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or (in the case of unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. The apostle says, "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil." (2 Cor. 5:10)
The names look flat on the page. They were not flat to live through:
We know what a scene of grief and pleading this must have been. It was a time of agony for many a father and mother in Israel whose sin had been found out like this. But the truth is that there is no real repentance without deep grief and pain. That is even more true when the sin is not the sin of one sinner only, but the sin of the people of God. They feel deeply that, as God's people, they have brought His name into contempt.
Commentators differ on how far Ezra 10 applies to a Christian's marriage. One holds that the principle of breaking an unequal yoke stands, but that marriage is a different case now:
So every one of these unequal yokes had to be broken, whatever either side felt about it. This was under law. Under grace today, if someone finds himself in an unequal yoke, the general rule is that he should leave it, if he can do so without being unjust to the other party... Marriage is not so simple, for Scripture tells the believer, "the wife should not separate from her husband" (1 Cor. 7:10).
Another writer applies the chapter to the way we get free of such ties:
As we grow in grace and understand the will of God better, we may see that something we thought little of is in fact a spiritual entanglement and a hindrance. Let us get out of it in a way that is worthy of the Lord whom we serve and obey. If, for example, it means a loss somewhere, let us take the loss ourselves instead of putting it on others.
- Named, not spared — the list runs from priests down to ordinary men, "without respect of persons". Rank bought no one an exemption.
- Named, and restored — taking the foreign wives was to their discredit. Sending them away was to their credit, and that is why their names appear at all.
- Named, at a price — obedience cost them wife and children. There is no real repentance without deep grief and pain.
- Named in God's book — nothing escapes His eye. He weighs and records all our actions, and will bring them out one day, either to magnify His grace or as the ground of righteous judgment.
- Named as a pattern — Israel was to stay separate from the nations. In a far higher sense, God's people are to be separate from the world, and to get free of every entanglement in a way worthy of the Lord.
Shallum, Amariah, Joseph.
Ezra's book ends not with a triumph but with a list of names — men who had married wives from the surrounding nations. This verse holds three of them, which raises a question: why did God keep such a list at all?
One writer notes both the scale of the failure and the even-handedness of the record:
More than a hundred were found, four of priestly rank, who gave a pledge to send away their wives and to offer the trespass offering required. Their names follow without respect of persons.
A name buried in the middle of a list still stands in Scripture. One commentator draws from that a principle that reaches far past Ezra's day:
Nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or (in the case of unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. The apostle says: "We must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil."
It would be easy to read the list as a wall of shame. Another writer reads it the other way round:
Notice that the names given are of those who put away the strange wives and offered a trespass offering. It was surely to their discredit that they had taken these wives, but the putting away of them was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, as the result of the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
The register does not begin with ordinary Israelites like the men of this verse. It begins higher up, with those who should have known best:
The names of the priests come first. Theirs was the greater responsibility and guilt. The sons of Joshua head the list. What a picture of what man is! The sons of the high priest had been, with Zerubbabel, great instruments of the Lord in leading the first captives back — and yet they corrupted themselves with these women. Six Levites were guilty too, and the guilty singers and gatekeepers are named. Then follow eighty-six more names of men who had all defiled themselves with foreign women.
The three men in this verse stand among that last group. The spread of the failure carries its own warning:
However much we may be blessed, no one among God's people is automatically exempt from being tested by the enemy's temptations.
Ezra told the people to separate from the peoples of the land, and then from the foreign wives. One commentator finds that order deliberate:
Marrying the strange wives had been the sin, so we might expect the wives to be mentioned first. But what had led to these marriages? Association with the people of the land. This was the root of the trouble, and Ezra deals with it first. So it is in every departure from God: until we find the root, nothing is gained and restoration is impossible.
The manner of the work matters as much as the fact of it:
We are told how carefully and in what good order they carried out the difficult and distressing work of putting away the strange wives. That is how they freed themselves from this worldly and sinful entanglement. If they had done it in an impulsive and reckless way, it might have brought further dishonour on the name of the Lord... Let us get out of any such entanglement in a way that is worthy of the Lord whom we serve and obey. If that means a loss somewhere, let us accept the loss ourselves, instead of putting it on others.
This wholesale putting away does not transfer straight across to marriage today. One writer marks the difference:
Every one of these unequal yokes had to be broken, no matter how either party felt about it. This was under law. Today, under grace, the general principle for someone in an unequal yoke is that he should leave it — if he can do so without injustice toward the other party. But marriage is not so simple, for Scripture tells the believer, "the wife should not separate from her husband" (1 Cor. 7:10)... How thankful we ought to be that we are living under grace rather than under law!
- Root — the marriages were the fruit. The root was mixing with the peoples of the land, and Ezra dealt with that first.
- Reach — the failure ran from the high priest's own sons down to ordinary families. No standing makes anyone exempt.
- Recorded — nothing escapes God's eye. He weighs every action, and one day He will bring it out.
- Restored — these men are named because they put the evil away. The list records backsliders recovered.
- Removal — undo entanglements carefully, and carry the cost yourself rather than putting it on someone else.
Of the children of Nebo Jeiel, Mattithiah, Zabad, Zebina, Jaddai, and Joel, Benaiah.
Ezra's book ends with a long list of names. They are men, family by family, who had married women from the nations around them, and the sons of Nebo come near the end. Why would God preserve such a list at all, and what does it say about the men whose names appear in it?
The chapter works down through the ranks of Israel. This verse sits in the part about the people in general, not the priests or temple servants.
Verse 23 speaks of Levites, verse 24 of singers, and verses 25-43 of others of the people. This reminds us of one thing: no matter how greatly we are blessed, the enemy can still tempt any of God's people.
The list names priests and ordinary men alike. No rank bought a quiet exit.
They found more than a hundred men, four of them priests, who pledged to send away their wives and to offer the trespass-offering required. Their names follow, with no regard for a man's rank (verses 18-44).
This record says something about God Himself.
Nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or — if we include unbelievers — as the ground of righteous judgment.
There is a second way to read the same list. These names mark not only what the men did wrong, but what they finally did right.
Notice that the names given are of those who put away the foreign wives and offered a trespass offering. Taking these wives was certainly to their discredit. But sending them away was to their credit, and so their names appear in the record. They were, as we might now put it, backsliders restored, through the faithful ministry and action of Ezra.
The list is long because the work went case by case.
The evil was obvious. The question was not whether it existed. Each case deserved its own discernment and judgment according to God. Three full months were enough to set this huge difficulty in order. They pronounced judgment in love, sparing no one and favouring no one, beginning with the priests. The list is a long one, but what grace! The restoration came without any new split. It came through a humbling that became a source of decision and energy, and through the ministry of the Word.
Every name in this verse stands for a household torn open.
Ruin around God's people is no licence to lower the standard.
The falling away of Israel, and then of Judah, led to the world-power of the Gentiles. Even so, it did not cancel God's will for faithful men. Still less does the ruin of the Christian world cancel it for the Christian now… We are called to do His will in obedience to His word, and we must, whatever the cost. The danger is in claiming laxity because things are in ruins. A true heart would feel that to be a louder call to watch and pray.
- Named, not exempt. The men here are ordinary Israelites, listed after the priests, Levites and singers. No measure of blessing puts a believer beyond the enemy's reach.
- Named, not shielded. The record starts with the priests and works down. Rank gave no one cover.
- Named, and costly. Each name cost a household real grief. There is no real repentance without deep pain.
- Named, one by one. Each man's case got its own hearing, in love, with no favourites. The work took three months and caused no new split.
- Named, and restored. The names appear because these men put the evil away. Commentators read the same list two ways: as proof that nothing escapes God's eye, and as an honour roll of men brought back.
All these had taken foreign wives; and there were among them wives who had had children.
The book of Ezra ends with a list, not a celebration. It names men who had married women from the nations around them, and it notes that some of those marriages had produced children. The last verse raises the book's hardest question. What does obedience cost when sin has already reached into a family?
Ezra does not call this a small slip. One writer shows what was at stake for an Israelite who married outside the nation:
Ezra stands up again, and now charges them plainly with their sin. "You have transgressed," he says, "and have taken foreign wives" — the great mark of apostasy for an Israelite, as far as the people were concerned. It was apostasy from God in taking a foreign god, and apostasy from the people by taking foreign wives. It was a complete giving up of their holy place of separateness to the Lord.
Undoing the wrong hurt real families:
And who would say it did not hurt? Over 100 men had offended in this way, and some of the women had borne children (v.44). But it was better to obey God now and bear the governmental consequences of their sin than to continue in it.
These people had come back from exile in Babylon. For them, this break was the mark of faithfulness:
Finally there were their own wives, several of whom had borne them children. They have to put them away, and to separate themselves, at whatever cost, from all that was not Israel. This is what marks faithfulness in a position like theirs.
One writer marks the difference between Ezra's day and the Christian era. The law shut those wives and children out. Grace answers the same situation in another way:
The law required them to send these wives and children away, for they were unclean. Israel's congregation could not receive them. How different it is under grace! In 1 Corinthians 7:10 and following, we read what grace has done even here. The believing wife sanctifies her unbelieving husband, and the believing husband sanctifies his unbelieving wife. Their children are not unclean, but holy.
Why list the offenders at all, down to which ones had children? Because the record is God's, not just Ezra's:
Nothing escapes the eye of God. He weighs and records all our actions. One day He will bring them out, either to magnify His grace, or (if we include unbelievers) as the ground of righteous judgment. "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil" (2 Corinthians 5:10).
One writer draws a warning from the first names on the list:
Some, if not all, of the sons of Jeshua the priest had taken part in this sin. But really, this should not surprise us, for similar tragedies have been all too frequent... It is a sad and humbling fact. Many true and devoted servants of our Lord have had sons who did not follow in their father's footsteps. The recognition of this fact should lead us to be much in prayer for the families of those who serve the Lord Jesus.
How they went about it mattered, not only that they did it:
Had it been done in an impulsive and reckless way, it might have brought further dishonour on the name of the Lord. This too may have a voice for us... we may come to see that something we thought little of is really a spiritual entanglement that holds us back. Let us get out of it in a way that is worthy of the Lord whom we serve and obey. If, for instance, someone must bear a loss, let us take it ourselves instead of putting it on others.
The final verse feels like a downbeat close to a book about revival. But you can read the list the other way round:
How sad, you may say, that a book of revival should end on such a sombre note!... But on the other hand, do not overlook what else this list holds. It names the men who "pledged themselves" and brought "a ram of the flock" as a guilt offering, to put right what was wrong (v.19). In other words, the book of Ezra ends with a list of people who have been restored!
- Root — these marriages meant leaving both God and Israel's separate standing. They were never a private matter of taste.
- Cost — the children named in the last line show the price of obedience. Bearing that cost was better than staying in the sin.
- Care — never act rashly. End a wrong tie in a way that honours the Lord, and carry the loss yourself.
- Record — every name stands written, because nothing escapes God's eye or His coming reckoning.
- Restoration — the same list names the men who confessed and brought their offering. Ezra ends with people put right.