Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal, and prophesy against him,
God tells Ezekiel to turn and face a distant power in the north and speak against it. The names — Gog, Magog, Meshech, Tubal — hold the whole difficulty of the verse: who are they, when do they come, and why does God single them out?
Commentators treat Gog as the ruler and Magog as the territory and people behind him, tracing the line back to the table of nations in Genesis.
Morrish Bible DictionaryGOG is a symbolic name for the powerful and proud chief of the vast hordes of Scythia and Tartary. MAGOG, the son of Japheth (Gen. 10:2), whose descendants spread over the vast steppes in the north; the land takes its name from him. Gog is the prince of Rosh, Meshech and Tubal — answering to Russia, Moscow, and Tobolsk... They will come "out of the north," "as a cloud to cover the land," and attack Israel in the land of Palestine, but God will strike them down.
Translations split here. The ESV reads "the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal." Others read "the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal" — three peoples instead of a title.
William KellyIt is worth noticing that "the chief prince" should be the "prince of Rosh." The word is not only an ordinary word meaning head or chief. It is also the Hebrew proper name for Russia, or the Russians. The names that follow prove it should be taken that way here. Nor is this merely the device of modern interpreters after events pointed out the way. The oldest version of the Old Testament is the Septuagint, the old Greek translation made by the Seventy. It supports the sense just mentioned... Now, what could be less expected, if we turn back to Ezekiel's own times, than a description of such a power?
The chapter itself dates the invasion, and describes an Israel already settled and at peace.
An Outline of Sound WordsFrom Ezekiel 38:8 we learn that this invasion is "in the latter years." They will come into a land brought back from the sword and gathered out of many peoples... They will all dwell safely. This is clearly after the beast and his armies have been destroyed, and it may also be after other conflicts have taken place. At any rate, the invader comes after the first of the regatherings of the nation, when they are settled down in safety.
Readers often confuse Gog with the ruler called the beast. The two want opposite things.
Walter ScottThe beast and Gog are opposing powers. Their policy and aims are widely different. The former is the would-be protector of the Jewish people; the latter their destroyer.
Gog comes from the far north, which links him to another figure the prophets call the king of the North, or the Assyrian.
The Bible TreasuryWe are told that Gog comes out of the "north parts," or the "uttermost north," with his "many peoples" and "a great assembly, and mighty army." Geographically, then, there is ground for believing Gog is closely linked with the king of the North, or Assyrian. Mr. Darby suggested that Gog is "the last phase of the Assyrian," and that appears to be very probably correct.
God sets Ezekiel against Gog because He is against Gog first. Gog's ambition is the reason.
William KellyBut the Lord Jehovah is against him. Good comes at last to a long-troubled people, and instead of seeing it, he would rather enlarge himself. So he finds himself lined up against not just the Israel of God, but the God of Israel. Cursed must he be who trusts in man and makes flesh his arm; and so Gog proves.
The outcome turns the attack inside out.
An Outline of Sound WordsGog was to learn what Pharaoh, in his day, had to learn. In attacking Israel he was challenging the God of Israel, for Israel were God's beloved people... Gog would not enrich himself at the expense of God's land and God's people. Instead, he would be the means of displaying the glory of the God of Israel before the nations.
The same two names come up again in Revelation. The two scenes are not the same.
T. B. BainesIn Revelation, Gog and Magog are used in a wider sense than in Ezekiel. Their invasion differs in time and details, though it agrees in character and aim with the one Ezekiel foretells... There the names describe the nations, not just from the north, but from all parts, "the four quarters of the earth." Again, the invasion Ezekiel names is at the beginning of Christ's reign; the one in Revelation is at the end.
- Name — Gog is the ruler. Magog is his land and people, descended from Japheth and spread across the northern steppes.
- Reading — Many read "chief prince" as "prince of Rosh." The Septuagint supports it, giving three peoples rather than one title.
- Timing — The attack falls in the latter years. Israel is back in the land and living in safety, and the beast has already fallen.
- Motive — Greed for a settled land drives him. By coming against Israel, he sets himself against Israel's God.
- Outcome — The invasion he plans as plunder ends as a public display of God's glory before the nations.
and say, Thus saith the Lord Jehovah Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal.
God names one man, lists his lands, and then says what no army can answer: He Himself is against him. Two questions follow — who is this ruler, and why does God confront him in person?
The verse names a man, and the wider passage gives his land and his peoples.
William KellyIt is the last enemy of Israel who confronts us. He lives in the land of Magog. Magog was that son of Japheth who in time spread over the vast steppes of the region once called Scythia. He rules all the Russian lands — prince of Rosh, Meshech and Tubal. So we have the man himself, his land, and his people. But the Lord Jehovah is against him. Instead of recognising when good comes to a long-troubled people, he would rather make himself great. So he finds himself lined up against not just the Israel of God, but the God of Israel. Anyone who trusts in man like this, and leans on human strength, must be cursed — and Gog proves it.
Commentators differ over the words "chief prince." Several argue that the word is also a proper name. They point to the oldest Greek translation of the Old Testament for support.
William KellyIt is worth noting that "the chief prince" should be "prince of Rosh." The word is not only an ordinary term meaning head or chief. It is also the Hebrew proper name for Russia, or the Russians. The proper nouns that follow prove it should be taken that way here. Nor is this merely a modern interpreter's device, invented after events pointed the way. The oldest version of the Old Testament is the Septuagint, the Greek Bible of the Seventy, and it supports the sense just mentioned… From the land of Magog, or old Scythia, comes this prince of certain races — the Russians (Rosh), the Muscovites (Meshech), and the people of Tobolsk (Tubal). Driven by greed for land, and above all for the Holy Land, he will lead countless armed followers against the land of Israel in the last day. But it will end in his own total destruction and theirs, under the judgment of God.
On that reading, the three names are traced to regions and cities still on the map.
A. J. PollockRosh, we believe, stands for Russia. Meshech stands for Moscow, the ancient capital of European Russia… Tubal, we believe, stands for Tobolsk, the capital of Asiatic Russia, that is, of Siberia.
God does more than denounce an invader. The next verse's picture of hooks in the jaws shows how He handles him.
An Outline of Sound WordsIn self-will this powerful ruler would seek to crush the people of God and enrich himself with the spoils of war. But God will step in, in His government, to draw him and his armies onward to the judgment He has prepared for them… Gog is doing his own will. Even so, God is drawing him to the place of slaughter, just as an animal is led with hooks in its jaws to the place of slaughter.
No army is big enough to save Gog once God stands against him. One writer hears a sharp edge in the order that Gog should guard his own hosts.
W. W. FeredayIf this were only a question between Israel and the enemy, the enemy would now wipe out the descendants of Jacob for good… But Jehovah will not give His chosen ones as prey to their teeth. He will turn on their enemies in righteous fury and indignation. We notice a little divine sarcasm in the words, "Be a guard for them." The hosts of Gog will find their leader unable to protect himself when Jehovah rises up to defend His people's cause.
Commentators draw two distinctions. First, Gog and the Beast are not the same power.
Walter ScottThe Beast and Gog are opposing powers. Their policy and aims are widely different. The former is the would-be protector of the Jewish people; the latter their destroyer.
Second, Gog and Magog appear again in Revelation 20. Writers keep the two events apart, mainly by their timing.
Frederick W. GrantThere need be no confusion between them. The invasion in Ezekiel comes before the thousand years; the one in Revelation comes after. It happens when Israel are just back in their land (Ezek. 38:14), and from that time God's name is known in Israel, and they pollute His holy name no more (Ezek. 39:7). The nations too learn to know Him (Ezek. 38:16, 23).
- Named. God names the ruler (Gog), his land (Magog), and his peoples. He marks out all three before judgment falls.
- Traced. Many read "chief prince" as "prince of Rosh." The Septuagint supports taking Rosh as a proper name. Writers then link Rosh, Meshech and Tubal to Russia, Moscow and Tobolsk.
- Opposed. God does not say Israel is against Gog; He says He is. Gog's grab for gain sets him against the God of Israel, not just the people of Israel.
- Drawn. Gog acts in self-will. Yet the hooks in his jaws show God drawing him to the judgment already prepared.
- Distinguished. Gog is not the Beast, who claims to protect the Jewish people. He is not the gathering of Revelation 20 either. Ezekiel's invasion comes before the thousand years.
And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws, and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them thoroughly equipped, a great assemblage with targets and shields, all of them handling swords
God tells Ezekiel to speak against Gog, a ruler far to the north, and the words are a summons rather than a warning to keep away. Who is this ruler, and why does God pull an enemy toward His own restored people?
The picture comes from handling an animal. Gog moves by his own greed, yet the movement is God's.
An Outline of Sound WordsIn self-will this powerful ruler would seek to crush the people of God and to enrich himself with the spoils of war. But God will step in and, in His government, draw him and his armies on to the judgment He has prepared for them… Gog does his own will, yet God is still drawing him to the place of slaughter, just as hooks in the jaws lead an animal there.
The verse names no country. The titles given to Gog point to the man, his land, and his people.
William KellyHere the case stands clearly defined in all but the name, which is probably symbolic. This is the last enemy of Israel who confronts us. He lives in the land of Magog. Magog was a son of Japheth, whose descendants later spread over the vast plains once called Scythia. He is sole ruler of all the Russias, prince of Rosh, Meshech and Tubal. So we have the man, his land, and his people. But the Lord Jehovah is against him. Instead of seeing the good that comes to a long-troubled people, he would make himself great, and so he stands in battle line against not only the Israel of God but the God of Israel.
Older English Bibles read "the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal", and writers here argue the phrase is a proper name being translated as a title:
J. N. Darby, quoted in The Bible TreasuryThe correct translation of "the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal" is "Prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal." I have no doubt this rendering is right. It comes from the elder Lowth, about a hundred and fifty years ago, before anyone raised these prophetic views.
The list of horses, armour, shields and swords adds up to a huge, fully equipped force. Its size carries the lesson.
William KellyThen one last lesson will be clear. The size of an army saves no king. Great strength rescues no strong man. A horse is useless for safety. Israel are poor in spirit at last, and Jehovah brings the plans of the nations to nothing, while His own plan stands for ever. There they come, dressed to perfection, a great company, with shield and buckler, all of them gripping swords.
Commentators set this attack apart from the invasion by the king of the north in Daniel. Two marks divide them.
W. W. FeredayThe invasion of "Gog, prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal" is Israel's last trouble before the thousand-year kingdom is set up in blessing. It comes from the same direction as the invasion by the King of the North (Dan. 11:41), but it differs in two ways. First, all the tribes are in the land when it happens. Second, Jehovah does not allow it the smallest success… By contrast, God Himself overthrows Gog and his armies in the northern mountains of Israel… the later invasion is unprovoked attack by an envious enemy.
Why would God bring out such a force for so small a gain? His answer looks past the plunder.
Numerical Bible NotesThe size of the attack looks out of all proportion to how small the prize is. So it may look to human eyes, but Jehovah's answer gives the deep reason underneath. He draws out this whole army so that, as He says, "the nations may know Me when I show Myself holy in you, O Gog, before their eyes."… Here we see an example of how the wheels of God's government turn, carrying forward the throne and its glorious Occupant.
God had used this same language once before, against an Assyrian king who raged against Him.
An Outline of Sound WordsGod's answer is "Because you have raged against me… I will put my hook in your nose and my bit in your mouth, and I will turn you back on the way by which you came" (Isa. 37:29). Compare these words with God's words to Gog in Ezekiel 38:4… The angel of the Lord went out to carry out God's sentence and struck down 185,000 men of Sennacherib's army.
- The hook — Gog marches by self-will, yet God draws him out like a beast led to slaughter.
- The host — the horses, armour and swords are real and vast, yet the size of an army saves no king.
- The hour — Gog comes after all the tribes are back in the land. This is Israel's last trouble before the kingdom, and it is not the earlier attack by the king of the north.
- The holiness — God draws the army out so the nations will know Him when He shows Himself holy in Gog before their eyes.
- The history — God once put the same hook in Sennacherib's nose, so the outcome for Gog is already on record.
Persia, Cush, and Phut with them, all of them with shield and helmet;
This verse names three of the peoples marching with Gog, the leader of a huge army massed against Israel. Two questions follow: who are these peoples, and why are lands so far apart joined in one invasion?
Some older English Bibles print "Ethiopia" and "Libya" here. The Hebrew names are Cush and Phut. One writer questions the second swap and places Phut in Africa:
William KellyPhut or Put is an example of the more degraded stock of Ham's descendants in Africa, next to Egypt and Ethiopia, and named with one or the other at times. But Phut can hardly be the Libyan, as the Authorised Version makes out of Jeremiah 46:9, or Libya as in Ezekiel 30:5 and Ezekiel 38:5, where it should be Phut as in Ezekiel 27:10. The very obscurity that covers this African branch of Ham's sons shows how low they had fallen.
Some readers have looked far to the north-east of Persia for Gog's confederates. One writer answers that Scripture settles the question, and that Cush reaches far beyond Africa:
J. N. DarbyThe author had no need to go so far north-east of Persia to look for the confederates. If he had taken the trouble to read the chapter in Ezekiel, he would have found it was just Persia itself, and the nations south-west of it: to give them their Hebrew names (which I do, because then Scripture will direct us), Cush and Phut. All the district about the Euphrates and the Tigris is Cush according to Scripture, and perhaps large districts in Arabia. Further, in Jeremiah 46:9, we find Cush and Phut connected with the Egyptian army... Nahum shows that Cush and Phut were naturally connected with Egypt.
Commentators differ over how far these names reach. One places Cush around the Euphrates and the Tigris; another puts Phut in Africa, beside Egypt and Ethiopia.
These nations come from three different family lines. Something has to pull them into one force:
W. W. FeredayGog will have many allies. They are given to us in three groups in Ezekiel 38:5-6, some from Japheth, some from Shem, and some from Ham. A very able hand will be needed to draw them together into one compact mass. Greed is apparently the cause of this terrible coalition against restored Israel.
Persia is named first here, but one writer reads the scene as nations swept along by a stronger power:
William KellyThere they come, perfectly equipped, a great company, with shield and buckler, all of them grasping swords. Persia too is there, forced to follow in the train of the mighty northern leader, with Cush and Phut. Gomer is there with all his bands, and the house of Togarmah from the far north with all his bands. Many people indeed with Gog!
Another power stands apart from Gog's alliance. One writer calls it the Beast, and shows that the two want opposite things for Israel:
Walter ScottPersia, Ethiopia, and so on are under the power of Russia and follow in the train of Gog, the last ruler of the Russian peoples (Ezekiel 38:2-6)... Egypt will be subordinate to and an ally of the Beast, and so an object of attack by the king of the north — Israel's determined political foe. The Beast and Gog are opposing powers. Their policy and aims are widely different. The former is the would-be protector of the Jewish people; the latter their destroyer.
The shield and helmet of this verse will not decide the battle:
W. W. FeredayIsrael will not need to fight: Jehovah will fight for them, and, as on the shores of the Red Sea, they have only to stand still and see His salvation. He will dispose of their enemies in the coming day as easily as He disposed of Pharaoh's armies in the distant past.
- Named. "Cush" and "Put" are the Hebrew names that older Bibles turned into "Ethiopia" and "Libya." One writer places Cush around the Euphrates; another puts Phut in Africa.
- Gathered. The allies come from three branches of Noah's descendants, and it will take an able hand to weld them into one force.
- Greedy. Greed is what pulls this alliance against a restored Israel.
- Dragged. Persia is forced to follow the northern leader. These nations serve another power's campaign; they do not lead it.
- Doomed. Israel will not need to fight. God will deal with this army as easily as He dealt with Pharaoh at the Red Sea.
Gomer, and all his bands; the house of Togarmah from the uttermost north, and all his bands; -- many peoples with thee.
Ezekiel 38 names the armies that will one day march against a restored Israel. Verse 6 closes that list with two northern peoples, and it raises three questions: who are Gomer and Togarmah, how does this coalition differ from Israel's other enemies, and when does it march?
The list began two verses earlier, and these peoples come from very different family lines:
W. W. FeredayGog will have many allies. Ezekiel 38:5-6 gives them in three groups: some descended from Japheth, some from Shem, and some from Ham. It will take a very able hand to draw them together into one compact mass. Greed is apparently the cause of this terrible coalition against restored Israel.
Commentators differ over the map. One reading puts these tribes to the east and north, with a branch that may have moved west:
William Kelly"Gomer and all his bands" are north-eastern; but the Cimri and others may be some of the race that migrated westward. "The house of Togarmah" of the north quarters I take to be the Armenian stock, as that people say of themselves. They will follow Gog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal, that is, the last head of the Russian Empire.
Others have read Gomer as France or Western Europe, and Togarmah as the Baltic lands. Kelly questions that reading, and his answer is a lesson in method:
William KellyShould we assume, without proof, that "Gomer and all his bands" means France and most of Continental Europe? Or that "Togarmah of the north quarters" means the countries around the Baltic Sea? Genesis 10:3 tells us the sons of Gomer were Ashkenaz, Riphath, and Togarmah. Scripture is silent about where Riphath lay, but Jeremiah 51:27 makes it certain that Ashkenaz belongs among the Asiatic kingdoms, probably the district between the Caspian and the Black Seas. What Scripture says of Togarmah leads me to look for it near the Caucasus range, far to the north of Palestine, and not on the borders of the Baltic. It is a fair subject for discussion, but it is well to weigh the evidence of Scripture before drawing conclusions.
This coalition comes from the far north. Another power will also be at work against Israel then, and the two are opposites:
Walter ScottPersia, Ethiopia and the rest are under the power of Russia. They follow in the train of Gog, the last ruler of the Russian peoples (Ezekiel 38:2-6)… The Beast and Gog are opposing powers. Their policy and aims are widely different. The former is the would-be protector of the Jewish people; the latter their destroyer.
The chapter fixes the timing later on. The invasion falls on a people already home and unguarded:
W. TrotterGog says, "I will go up to the land of unwalled villages. I will go to those at rest, dwelling without walls, and having no bars or gates." God tells the prophet to say to him, "In that day when my people Israel are dwelling securely, will you not know it? You will come from your place out of the uttermost parts of the north… and come up against my people Israel, like a cloud covering the land." So this northern confederacy invades only after Israel has returned and settled peacefully in the land, under the protection of their Messiah. The terrible judgment that falls on the invaders comes after that too.
The armies believe they are choosing their own campaign. The prophecy says otherwise:
An Outline of Sound WordsIn self-will this powerful ruler would seek to crush the people of God and enrich himself with the spoils of war. But in His government God will step in, drawing him and his armies on to the judgment He has prepared for them… Gog does his own will, yet God is drawing him to the place of slaughter, just as hooks in the jaws lead an animal there.
Verse 6 ends by piling up numbers — bands, more bands, and many peoples besides. The answer to that show of strength is irony:
William KellyThen, as a final lesson, it will appear that the size of his army saves no king… There they come, perfectly dressed for battle, a great company with shields, all of them grasping swords; Persia too is there, forced to follow the train of the mighty northern leader, Cush and Put with them; Gomer and all his bands; the house of Togarmah from the far north, and all his bands: many peoples indeed with Gog! With grave irony God tells him to be prepared and prepare himself, he and all his vast confederacy, and to be their guard — if he can!
- Named — Gomer and Togarmah go back to Genesis 10. Their bands close a coalition of three groups from very different family lines.
- Debated — Some look for them in Armenia and the north-east, others in France and the Baltic. Weigh the evidence of Scripture before settling on a map.
- Distinct — This northern army is not the Beast's empire. The Beast poses as Israel's protector; Gog comes as their destroyer.
- Timed — The attack falls after Israel is home and living safely, in villages without walls, bars or gates.
- Drawn — Greed moves the armies. Hooks in the jaws move them too, and they gather only to reach the place God has appointed, where the size of an army saves no king.