Ezekiel 34:1–10

Ezekiel 34:1 · Darby

And the word of Jehovah came unto me, saying,

Ezekiel 34 opens the way the rest of the book does: a word comes from God for the prophet to pass on. This time it is not sent to the nation as a whole, but to the men at the top who were meant to care for God's people.

"Son of man": the prophet's title

God does not address Ezekiel by name. His dealings with Israel had changed, and the title He gives the prophet shows it.

The new attitude is remarkably shown in another way by the title God gives to the prophet, who had fallen on his face, in chapter 2 and from then on. For when the voice spoke from the likeness of the glory of Jehovah, the words were, Son of man, stand upon your feet, and I will speak to you. Daniel was called this once (Dan. 8:17), and Ezekiel more than a hundred times. It is the title Jesus took as the rejected Messiah who would suffer, be exalted, and return in glory as the Son of man. His servants have the same title, since they are identified with the glory of God, who now declares Himself outside Israel and even judges them by the Gentiles.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The message singles out the rulers

The word "shepherds" here does not mean men with sheep. It means the men who ruled the nation.

Next comes a solemn, righteous, but severe condemnation of the kings or shepherds of Israel. Jehovah lays the blame on them for selfishly afflicting and ruining His people.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The warning is aimed at leaders, but one writer says it is the people under them who should listen hardest.

It is not often that the shepherds are addressed in Scripture. Where they are, it is well for the Lord's people to pay particular attention.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

The charge: they fed themselves

The charge is that the position itself became the profit.

They are charged with using their position to exalt themselves at the expense of the flock. They fed themselves; they indulged themselves; they clothed themselves, but they allowed the flock to perish for lack of food.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The root error: whose flock is it?

Under the cruelty lies a mistake about ownership.

Without the fear of God or love for His people, they forgot how both they and Israel stood in relation to Jehovah. Everything went wrong, as it had to once His rights had no place in their eyes. Like the Gentile kings, they treated the people they governed as their own, not as the flock of God — so came confusion and every evil work.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What keeps a shepherd from that mistake is knowing who owns the sheep.

And it was the flock of God that they were to feed. What a solemn and sweet thought! How impossible it is for anyone to think of the flock as his own, once he has grasped that it is God's flock, and that God lets us feed it!

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Shepherd they were not

Kelly sets these rulers beside the King who is coming.

What a contrast with Him who stoops to be Son of David and King of Israel! He will rule over them justly, reigning in righteousness. He will be a hiding place from the wind and a shelter from the storm, like rivers of water in a dry land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who else this speaks to

Writers do not leave the chapter in Israel's past.

The special application of Ezekiel 34 is to the shepherds of Israel. But it surely carries a solemn and needed lesson to everyone who takes up the work of a pastor among God's people.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same writer traces the failure back past the sheep to the Shepherd.

May it be a warning to us all! When we think more of ourselves than of the great Shepherd, then we shall think more of ourselves than of the sheep. Christianity consists of self-giving, not self-getting.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Judgment that opens into blessing

This opening also tells us where the chapter sits in the book.

Again we have no date given for the time of the message, and there is no other until we come to the closing vision of the temple in the restored land. What follows here seems to pour out without any pause. And while judgment comes once more at the opening, it is now clearly connected with blessing, as the way to it.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Commission. God speaks to Ezekiel as "son of man." Daniel bore the title once. Jesus took it as the rejected Messiah who would suffer and return in glory.

- Target. The word is aimed at the shepherds — Israel's rulers. Scripture speaks to leaders so seldom that the passage deserves close attention.

- Charge. They used their position for themselves. They fed and clothed themselves while the flock starved for lack of food.

- Root. They treated the people as their own property, not as God's flock. Once His rights counted for nothing, everything else went wrong.

- Reach. The lesson reaches everyone who cares for God's people. Put yourself before the great Shepherd, and you will put yourself before the sheep.

Ezekiel 34:2 · Darby

Son of man, prophesy against the shepherds of Israel, prophesy; and say unto them, unto the shepherds, Thus saith the Lord Jehovah Woe to the shepherds of Israel that feed themselves! Should not the shepherds feed the flock?

God tells Ezekiel to prophesy against the shepherds of Israel. The charge comes as a question that answers itself: men set over a flock were living off it instead of feeding it. Behind that charge lies a deeper one — whose sheep were they, and who must answer for them?

Who the shepherds were

The word does not mean farmhands. It covers everyone who held authority over the nation. Another prophet had already brought the same complaint.

The shepherds of Israel were the kings and princes and all who had authority over them. The prophet Jeremiah had received a similar message (Jer. 23:1-2). These shepherds of Israel were responsible for the deplorable condition of the flock. They were utterly selfish. They did not care for the sheep of His pasture. They did not fear God, and they had no heart for God's people. The flock was scattered and spoiled.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Feeding themselves

The first charge is not incompetence. These men turned their position into profit, and the sheep paid for it.

They are charged with using their position to exalt themselves at the expense of the flock… They fed themselves. They indulged themselves. They clothed themselves. But they let the flock perish for lack of food.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The direction of the traffic

A shepherd is meant to be a channel of supply. These men reversed the flow, and the reversal starts in the heart long before it shows in the hands.

The first complaint is that the shepherds fed themselves and not the sheep. They took from the sheep, instead of giving to the sheep…

When we think more of ourselves than of the great Shepherd, we will think more of ourselves than of the sheep. Christianity consists of self-giving, not in self-getting.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Whose flock

The flock belonged to God, not to the men who ruled it. Forgetting that one fact corrupted everything else they did.

So, without the fear of God or love for His people, they forgot what both they and Israel were to Jehovah. So everything went wrong, as it could not fail to do when His rights had no place in their eyes. Like the kings of the nations around them, they treated the people they governed as their own, not as the flock of God. So came confusion and every evil work.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why God moves against them

God's judgment on these men is not cold. He steps in for sheep He loves, and He ends one thing in particular.

The doom of the shepherds is therefore now announced. It is the judgment of love that strikes to deliver. There must be an end of this false claim to the shepherd's place without the shepherd's heart. That claim is deeply offensive to Him whose heart is with the sheep. He is afflicted in all the afflictions of His people, and when He rises up to help them, He will make a thorough work of it.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

A chapter for shepherds still

Ezekiel spoke to Israel, but these principles reach further.

What need there is for care in the Church of God! Ezekiel 34 is a very remarkable chapter, and it speaks entirely to the shepherds and sheep of Israel. Yet the divine principles it unfolds apply just as clearly to shepherds or pastors in the Christian world. Everyone who cares for the Lord's people would do well to read this wonderful chapter until its lessons sink deep into their hearts.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The Shepherd who does the work Himself

The failure of these shepherds is the dark background for a promise. God says He will require His flock from them, and will do Himself what they would not do.

So the shepherds were to hear the word of Jehovah, who is against the shepherds and will require His flock at their hands. He Himself will both search and seek out His sheep. He will deliver them out of all the places where they have been scattered in the cloudy and dark day. He will gather them from the countries, bring them to their own land, and feed them on the mountains of Israel by the rivers. There they shall lie in a good fold and feed in a good pasture. More than all, He will set up over them one shepherd who shall feed them, His servant David, who is not less Jehovah than Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Trust. Shepherd here means ruler — kings, princes, all in authority. The sheep were never their own.

- Theft. They fed themselves: they took from the flock instead of giving to it, and left it to starve.

- Owner. Their root failure was forgetting God's rights. They treated His people as their own property.

- Verdict. God ends the shepherd's place held without the shepherd's heart — judgment that strikes to deliver.

- Shepherd. What these shepherds refused to do, God does Himself: seek, gather, and feed His flock in good pasture.

Ezekiel 34:3 · Darby

Ye eat the fat, and ye clothe you with the wool; ye kill them that are fattened [but] ye feed not the flock.

God speaks through Ezekiel against the men who should have cared for His people. Verse 3 names what they took from the flock — the fat, the wool, the best animals — while the sheep went unfed. The charge raises a question that outlives Israel: what is a shepherd for?

Who the shepherds were

Ezekiel is not talking about farmers. He is talking about the men who held power over God's people.

The shepherds of Israel were the kings and princes and all who had authority over them. The prophet Jeremiah had received a similar message (Jeremiah 23:1-2). These shepherds of Israel were responsible for the terrible state of the flock. They were completely selfish. They did not care for the sheep of His pasture, they did not fear God, and they had no heart for God's people. The flock was scattered and ruined.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The charge itself

The three things listed in the verse add up to a single accusation.

They are charged with using their position to lift themselves up at the expense of the flock. They fed themselves. They indulged themselves. They clothed themselves. But they let the flock die for lack of food.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Everything ran in the wrong direction.

The first complaint is that the shepherds fed themselves and not the sheep. They took from the sheep, instead of giving to the sheep.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The wool

One writer follows the wool into three other Bible stories.

The fleece is the wool taken from the sheep. It seems to picture taking away from the owner what rightly belonged to him. It is striking that Scripture mentions sheep-shearing three times, and each time there was evil. Judah sinned with Tamar at his sheep-shearing. Nabal insulted David at the same kind of time. Absalom killed his brother on a similar occasion.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why it went so wrong

Behind the eating and the clothing lies a forgotten fact of ownership.

They had no fear of God and no love for His people. So they forgot what they themselves were to the Lord, and what Israel was to Him. Everything went wrong, as it was bound to do once His rights counted for nothing in their eyes. Like the kings of the nations around them, they treated the people they governed as their own, not as the flock of God. The result was confusion and every evil work. … The shepherds had fed themselves, not the flock. They did not feed the sheep, no matter what benefits they had drawn from them. None of the sheep's sorrows drew out their sympathies.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God's answer matches the crime

What they had made their table, God took away.

Because of this selfish conduct the Lord said, "Behold, I am against the shepherds." He would hold them to account for the flock. As a punishment they would no longer be allowed to feed the flock, nor to feed themselves — that last part a fitting punishment indeed.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The same warning today

The warning did not stop with Israel's rulers.

Ezekiel 34 applies first of all to the shepherds of Israel. Yet it carries a serious and needed lesson for everyone who takes up the work of a pastor among God's people.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The test is simple, and it starts with who fills our thoughts.

May it be a warning to us all! When we think more of ourselves than of the great Shepherd, then we shall think more of ourselves than of the sheep. Christianity consists of self-giving, not in self-getting.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The Shepherd who feeds

This dark picture has a bright opposite.

This may carry our thoughts back to Ezekiel 34, where we find a tremendous indictment of the former shepherds of Israel. These religious leaders fed themselves and not the sheep. They set such a bad example that the stronger sheep bullied the weaker. The strong ate up the good pasture and trampled down the rest of it (verse 18). So for the poor of the flock there was no pasture at all. Jesus, the true Shepherd of Israel, leads His own sheep into an abundance of spiritual food.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Kelly sets these men beside the King who is coming.

What a contrast with Him who stoops to be Son of David and King of Israel! He will rule over them justly, reigning in righteousness, like a hiding place from the wind and a shelter from the storm, like rivers of water in a dry land, like the shade of a great rock in a weary land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Trust. The shepherds were Israel's kings, princes and rulers. God gave them authority over a flock that was never theirs.

- Theft. Fat, wool and the best of the flock all went one way: they took from the sheep instead of giving to the sheep.

- Root. They treated the people as their own property. God's rights counted for nothing, so everything else went wrong.

- Judgment. They fed only themselves. So God declared Himself against them. He stopped them feeding the flock — and stopped them feeding themselves.

- Contrast. The true Shepherd does the opposite. He leads His own sheep into plenty of food. Christianity is self-giving, not self-getting.

Ezekiel 34:4 · Darby

The weak have ye not strengthened, nor have ye healed the sick, and ye have not bound up [what was] broken, neither have ye brought again that which was driven away, neither have ye sought for that which was lost; but with harshness and with rigour have ye ruled over them.

Ezekiel 34 speaks to the shepherds of Israel, the men God trusted with His people. Verse 4 lists, one by one, the things they never did. The charge is not vague corruption. It is neglect you can count: five needs left unmet, and then a way of ruling that made everything worse.

The Five Things Left Undone

The verse works through the flock case by case. Each case names a real sheep the shepherds walked past.

The charge against the shepherds is that they completely neglected the flock. There were weak sheep, but they had not strengthened them. There were sick sheep, but they had not healed them. There were wounded sheep, but they had not bound up their wounds. There were sheep driven away from the flock, but they made no effort to get them back. There were wandering sheep, but they had not gone after the lost. They were taken up with themselves, and they completely neglected the good of the sheep.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Force and Harshness

The second half of the verse adds a separate charge. Neglect was not the whole of it. The ESV says "with force and harshness"; the older wording quoted here is "with force and with cruelty."

The charge against these shepherds is that they ruled God's flock "with force and with cruelty." They had not only neglected the sheep. They had crushed and oppressed them for their own selfish ends.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Behind the cruelty lay a false idea of ownership.

Like the kings of the nations around them, they treated the people they governed as their own, not as the flock of God. So came confusion and every evil work… They ruled harshly and severely. They scattered the sheep and left them as prey to wild animals, with no shepherd's care.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Root of It

Where does neglect like this start? One writer traces it back to self.

May it be a warning to us all! When we think more of ourselves than of the great Shepherd, then we shall think more of ourselves than of the sheep. Christianity consists of self-giving, not in self-getting.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The Shepherd Who Did It All

When Jesus began His public ministry, He took up the very list these shepherds ignored.

Then light sprang up for those who sat in the region and shadow of death. Then the Shepherd of Israel began to feed the flock. Unlike those who had come before Him, He began to strengthen the diseased, to heal the sick, to bind up the broken, and to seek the lost.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Among the Scattered

God Himself takes up the shepherd's work, and where He does it matters.

He does not do it from far off, from some high position, sending down directions for the care of the sheep. He does it as a shepherd "among his sheep that are scattered." … If we have driven them away, will He desert them? Never. If we have scattered them, will He forsake them? Never.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Pattern Repeated

Commentators apply the verse well past ancient Israel.

Times and places differ. Even so, has the Church not repeated similar practices through its history, at times even inside local churches? Harshness and severity have scattered people. Sheep end up sick, wounded, and wandering when no one gives them proper care, and when only "the fat and the strong" get attention.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

This kind of cruelty seldom looks like cruelty. It often comes dressed as faithfulness.

Is there not a tendency to treat with coldness and severity those we would class as "diseased" — to keep our distance from those we might class as weak and feeble? … What cruelty and injustice people have done in the name of Christ, perhaps not willingly or on purpose, but often through mistaken ideas of faithfulness!

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The Test Today

Harsh rule drives the sheep away. That gives a simple test for anyone who cares for others.

Do we seek after the lost sheep today? Do we bring back those who have been driven away? Do we bind up the broken and strengthen the sick? How much of the scattering there has been, and how little of gathering. The flesh scatters. It is the Spirit who gathers. Anyone can scatter, but it takes divine power to do the gathering.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Self. The shepherds were taken up with themselves. Every failure in verse 4 grows from that one root: self-getting instead of self-giving.

- Neglect. Five kinds of sheep went untouched: weak, sick, wounded, driven away, lost. The sin shows in the list of who got no help.

- Force. A second charge follows the first. The rulers treated God's people as their own property, so they crushed the flock as well as ignored it.

- Contrast. Christ took up the same list and did it all: strengthening, healing, binding up, seeking. He tends His sheep from among the scattered, and never deserts those others drove away.

- Test. Scattering is the fruit of self. Gathering takes the Spirit. Anyone can scatter, so ask a hard question: are we calling coldness toward the weak faithfulness?

Ezekiel 34:5 · Darby

And they were scattered because there was no shepherd; and they became meat to all the beasts of the field, and were scattered.

Ezekiel 34 opens with God's charge against the shepherds of Israel. Verse 5 gives the result: a flock with no one to lead it, broken up and left to the wild beasts. How could a nation full of leaders have no shepherd? And what does God do when the men responsible for His people abandon them?

Who the shepherds were

The word covers everyone who held authority over the people. God lays the state of the flock at their door.

The shepherds of Israel were the kings and princes and all who had authority over them. The prophet Jeremiah had received a similar message (Jer. 23:1-2). These shepherds of Israel were responsible for the terrible condition of the flock. They were completely selfish. They did not care for the sheep of His pasture. They did not fear God, and they had no heart for God's people. The flock was scattered and ruined.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

So "no shepherd" does not mean the office stood empty. Men filled it without the heart that belongs to it.

This false claim to the shepherd's place, without the shepherd's heart, must come to an end. Such a claim is deeply offensive to Him. His heart is with the sheep. He is afflicted in all the afflictions of His people. And when He rises up to help them, He will do a thorough work.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why the flock came apart

The root problem was ownership. These men treated the people as their own property, not as God's flock.

Like the Gentile kings, they saw the people they governed as their own, not as the flock of God. From this came confusion and every evil work... The shepherds had fed themselves, not the flock... They ruled with harshness and severity, and scattered them, a prey to all the wild beasts, with no shepherd's care.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Scattered and easy prey

The verse sets out a chain: no shepherd, then scattering, then the beasts. The scattering is what leaves each sheep an easy meal.

The sheep are scattered because there is no shepherd to lead them. Once scattered, they become a prey to the beasts of the field... Instead of one flock — one beautiful flock — we have scattered, harassed, wandering sheep, with no one to search or seek after them... United, they could have resisted the attacks of the enemy. Scattered, they fall an easy prey to every evil.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The same sight in Christ's day

Centuries later the Lord looked at Israel and saw the same thing. He saw it in a time full of religious activity.

"When he saw the crowds, he had compassion for them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd." And yet there was much religion then — though this was how the Great Shepherd judged them. There were many sects. They kept the feast-days. There was a great stir in everything that might mark a day of public religious decency and devotion... There were plenty of teachers, and plenty of zeal. And yet, in the eyes of Him who saw them as God saw them, Israel was without a shepherd, an unkept, unfed flock.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

A warning that outlives Israel

Commentators hold this verse up as a mirror for anyone who cares for God's people now. The test is how they treat the hurt and the wandering.

A hard and legal spirit will never restore such a person. It will only drive him further away. I have watched in deep distress as one of these soul doctors set out to put a fallen brother right. I saw him drive that brother far away. Instead of picking him up, he knocked him further down. More than one fallen person has cried to me with tears: "They drove me away!" I knew it was true and I thought of Ezekiel 34, and the shepherds there... How we need some true shepherds today.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

The Shepherd God promises

The chapter does not end with the damage. The judgment on the shepherds is the rescue of the sheep.

But if God is against the shepherds, He is for the sheep. He says, "I will rescue my sheep from their mouths, that they may not be food for them." And in the verses that follow we have a magnificent description of how God shepherds His flock.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

God's remedy is one Shepherd of His own choosing.

In the book of Ezekiel, God had a dispute with both the shepherds and the sheep. He exposes their sins and threatens them with judgment. Then, in the most moving way possible, He pours out His compassion for the weak remnant of the flock: "because there was no shepherd, and because my shepherds have not searched for my sheep... therefore I will rescue my flock... And I will set up over them one shepherd, my servant David, and he shall feed them and be their shepherd." (Ezek. 34:8, 22, 23.)

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- No heart, no shepherd. Israel had kings, princes and teachers. God still calls it a flock without a shepherd. Men filled the place; the shepherd's heart was missing.

- No shepherd, no flock. With no one to lead, the sheep break apart. They scattered because the leaders fed themselves, not because the sheep were weak.

- No flock, no safety. Together they could have held off the enemy. Alone, each one is easy food.

- No shepherd then either. When Christ came, religion was busy and teachers were many. He still saw an unfed, unkept flock — and had compassion on it.

- One Shepherd, and the flock is safe. God turns against the false shepherds because He is for the sheep. He rescues them from the mouths that fed on them, and sets one Shepherd over them: His servant David.

Ezekiel 34:6 · Darby

My sheep wandered through all the mountains, and upon every high hill, and my sheep have been scattered upon all the face of the earth, and there was none that searched, or that sought for them.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Ezekiel 34:7 · Darby

Therefore, ye shepherds, hear the word of Jehovah

Chapter 34 has just listed, charge after charge, what Israel's shepherds did to the flock God gave them. Now the word turns back on the shepherds themselves and calls them to listen. Who were these men? What had they failed to do, and what will God do about it?

The Summons Before the Sentence

Verse 7 reads like a courtroom. God has read the charges. Now He tells the accused to stand and listen. One writer sets this summons against a God who had been watching all along:

But He who had called men to the throne over Israel was not indifferent to His people groaning under their wicked rulers… Their sin is laid out. The shepherds stand convicted and sentenced. But the LORD promises to rescue His sheep.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who the Shepherds Were

The word "shepherds" here is not a picture of farm life. It names the men who held power over the nation:

The shepherds of Israel were the kings and princes and all who had authority over them. The prophet Jeremiah had received a similar message (Jer. 23:1-2). These shepherds of Israel were responsible for the terrible condition of the flock. They were completely selfish. They did not care for the sheep of His pasture. They did not fear God, and they had no heart for God's people. The flock was scattered and plundered.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The "Therefore" Behind the Call

The command to hear rests on what came before it. Much of the indictment is not about cruelty done, but about care withheld — a list of things left undone:

There were weak sheep, but they had not strengthened them. There were sick sheep, but they had not healed them. There were wounded sheep, but they had not bound up their wounds. Some sheep had been driven away from the flock, but they made no effort to bring them back. Others were wandering, but they had not gone after the lost (v. 4). Taken up with themselves, they had completely neglected the good of the sheep.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The damage spread outward from that neglect. Sheep with no one leading them drift, and drifting sheep are easy to pick off:

The sheep scatter because there is no shepherd to lead them. Once scattered, they become prey to the wild animals. Hunted by those animals, they wander over all the barren mountains and every high hill. Instead of one flock — one beautiful flock — we have sheep scattered, hunted and wandering, with no one to search for them.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Judgment That Is Really Rescue

What follows the summons is a sentence — but the motive behind the sentence is affection for the sheep:

So now God announces the doom of the shepherds. It is the judgment of love that strikes to deliver. This false claim to the shepherd's place without the shepherd's heart must end. It is especially offensive to Him whose heart is with the sheep. He suffers in all the sufferings of His people, and when He rises up to help them He will do a thorough work.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The same act has two faces, depending on which side of it you stand:

But if God is against the shepherds, He is for the sheep. He says, "I will rescue my flock from their mouth, so that they will not be food for them." In the verses that follow we have a wonderful description of how God shepherds His flock. And the shepherds under Him should act as the Chief Shepherd acts.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Who Else Should Be Listening

The chapter speaks first to Israel's own rulers. It does not stop there:

Ezekiel 34 applies in a special way to the shepherds of Israel. But it surely carries a serious and needed lesson for everyone who takes up the work of a pastor among God's people.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One writer traces the failure back to its starting point:

May it be a warning to us all! When we think more of ourselves than of the great Shepherd, then we shall think more of ourselves than of the sheep. Christianity consists of self-giving, not in self-getting.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Hear the charge. The shepherds are the kings, princes and rulers. God holds them responsible for the ruined state of the flock.

- Hear the neglect. Men busy with themselves left the weak, the sick, the wounded and the lost with no one to help.

- Hear the damage. Leaderless sheep scatter. Scattered sheep become prey. One flock ends up as wanderers with no one searching for them.

- Hear the sentence. The doom announced is the judgment of love that strikes to deliver. God ends the claim to a shepherd's place held without a shepherd's heart.

- Hear the promise. God against the shepherds means God for the sheep. The way the Chief Shepherd then acts sets the pattern for everyone who cares for His people.

Ezekiel 34:8 · Darby

[As] I live, saith the Lord Jehovah, verily because my sheep have been a prey, and my sheep have been meat to every beast of the field, because there was no shepherd, and my shepherds searched not for my flock, but the shepherds fed themselves, and fed not my flock,

God speaks here under oath. Before He sentences Israel's leaders, He lists the charges again: sheep torn by wild animals, no one looking for them, shepherds feeding off the flock.

Who the Shepherds Were

The word "shepherd" here is not a picture of a farm worker. It names the men who held power over the nation.

The shepherds of Israel were the kings and princes and all who had authority over them. The prophet Jeremiah had received a similar message (Jer. 23:1-2). These shepherds of Israel were responsible for the terrible condition of the flock. They were completely selfish. They did not care for the sheep of His pasture. They did not fear God, and they had no heart for God's people. The flock was scattered and plundered.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Whose Sheep They Were

Five times in this one verse God says "my" — my sheep, my shepherds, my sheep again. That word is the hinge of the charge: the men in office had reversed it. Kelly sets their rule against the rule of the King who is coming.

So, without the fear of God or love for His people, they forgot the relations both of themselves and of Israel to Jehovah. So everything went wrong, as it could not fail to do when His rights had no place in their eyes. Like the Gentile monarchs, they regarded the people whom they governed as their own, not as the flock of God. The result was confusion and every evil work. What a contrast with Him who humbles Himself to be Son of David and King of Israel, and who will rule over them justly, reigning in righteousness!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same mistake is still available to anyone in spiritual charge of others.

It was and still is of the greatest importance to regard "the flock" as God's. This matters all the more because even excellent souls usually forget this truth. They assume that the sheep they feed and care for are their own flocks. Such a thought betrays an unwitting denial of God's rights, and falsifies the relation of His sheep.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Feeding Themselves

The charge is not laziness. The flow ran the wrong way: what should have gone to the sheep came out of them instead.

The first complaint is that the shepherds fed themselves and not the sheep. They took from the sheep, instead of giving to the sheep. They ate the fat and clothed themselves with the wool. Further, they did not strengthen the diseased or heal the sick, and they ruled with force and cruelty.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

No Shepherd, and a Prey

The verse links three things: no shepherd, scattered sheep, easy prey. Hamilton Smith traces that chain down to God's people now.

The sheep are scattered for lack of a shepherd to lead them. Once scattered, they become a prey to the beasts of the field… Instead of one flock — one beautiful flock — we have scattered, harassed, wandering sheep with no one to look for them… When the leaders fail, God's people are scattered, and once scattered they fall a prey to the enemy. United they could have resisted the enemy's attacks; scattered, they fall an easy prey to every evil.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Oath and the Verdict

"As I live" turns a complaint into a legal judgment. The sentence that follows has a rescue inside it.

Their sin is laid out. The shepherds stand convicted and sentenced. But Jehovah promises to deliver His sheep.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God's judgment on the shepherds and His care for the sheep move together:

The doom of the shepherds is therefore now announced. It is the judgment of love which smites for deliverance. There must be an end of this false claim to the shepherd's place without the shepherd's heart. Such a claim is especially offensive to Him whose heart is with the sheep. He is afflicted in all the afflictions of His people, and when He rises to help them, He will do a thorough work.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why It Still Applies

This chapter speaks to Israel's shepherds first. It does not stop there.

Ezekiel 34 applies in a special way to the shepherds of Israel. Yet it certainly carries a solemn and needed lesson for everyone who takes up the work of a pastor among God's people.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Mine. God calls them my sheep and my shepherds. The leaders treated the people as their own property, and every other evil followed.

- Taking. The charge is about direction: they took from the sheep instead of giving to them. They ate the fat and wore the wool, and never fed the flock.

- Scattered. No shepherd means scattered sheep, and scattered sheep mean easy prey. United they could have resisted; divided, they fall to every evil.

- Sworn. "As I live" turns the complaint into a verdict. God convicts and sentences the shepherds, and it is the judgment of love that strikes to deliver.

- Ours. The chapter speaks first to Israel's rulers. It still carries a solemn lesson for everyone who pastors God's people.

Ezekiel 34:9 · Darby

-- therefore, ye shepherds, hear the word of Jehovah.

Two verses earlier God told Israel's shepherds to hear His word, and here He says it again. The repetition is deliberate: God is about to pass sentence, and the shepherds must listen.

A summons that demands attention

This word is aimed at leaders, and the rest of God's people are meant to listen in.

It is not often that the shepherds are addressed in Scripture. Where they are it is well for the Lord's people to pay particular attention.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

This call to hear is the pause before a verdict. And the verdict is not the last word.

But He who called them to rule over Israel was not indifferent to His people groaning under their wicked rulers… He sets out their sin. He convicts and sentences the shepherds. But the Lord promises to deliver His sheep.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the "therefore"

The "shepherds" here are Israel's kings. The "therefore" of verse 9 reaches back to what they had done, and the root of it was a false sense of ownership.

This is a solemn, righteous, but severe denunciation of the kings or shepherds of Israel, at whose door the Lord lays the blame for selfishly afflicting and ruining His people… So without the fear of God or love for His people, they forgot what both they and Israel were to the Lord. So everything went wrong, as it could not fail to do when His rights had no place in their eyes. Like the Gentile kings, they regarded the people they governed as their own, not as the flock of God. The result was confusion and every evil work. The shepherds had fed themselves, not the flock… They ruled with harshness and severity. They scattered the sheep, leaving them a prey to all the wild beasts, with no shepherd's care.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The sentence is an act of rescue

The doom announced right after this summons is not cold revenge. God strikes so that His sheep can live.

The doom of the shepherds is therefore now announced. It is the judgment of love which strikes to deliver. There must be an end of this false claim to the shepherd's place without the shepherd's heart. Such a claim is especially offensive to Him whose heart is with the sheep. He is afflicted in all the afflictions of His people, and when He rises up to help them, He will make a thorough work of it.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Against the shepherds, for the sheep

The same words that condemn the leaders comfort the sheep.

But if God is against the shepherds, He is for the sheep. He says, "I will rescue my sheep from their mouths, that they may not be food for them." And in the verses that follow we have a magnificent description of how God shepherds His flock. And as the Chief Shepherd acts, so should the under-shepherds.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Who has to listen now

The address was to Israel's leaders, but the lesson did not die with them.

The special application of Ezekiel 34 is to the shepherds of Israel. But it surely carries a solemn and needed lesson to everyone who takes up the work of a pastor among God's people.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The warning comes with a simple test: who do we think about most?

May it be a warning to us all! When we think more of ourselves than of the great Shepherd, then we shall think more of ourselves than of the sheep. Christianity consists of self-giving, not self-getting.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Hear. Scripture does not often address leaders. When it does, God's people should pay close attention.

- Why. The shepherds treated the people as their own property, not as God's flock. Everything else went wrong from there.

- Verdict. The doom announced is the judgment of love that strikes to deliver. God will not tolerate the shepherd's place held without the shepherd's heart.

- Rescue. God is against the shepherds and for the sheep in one act. He rescues the flock from the mouths that fed on it, then feeds it Himself.

- Mirror. The Chief Shepherd sets the pattern for every under-shepherd: self-giving, not self-getting.

Ezekiel 34:10 · Darby

Thus saith the Lord Jehovah Behold, I am against the shepherds; and I will require my sheep at their hand, and cause them to cease from feeding the flock that the shepherds may feed themselves no more; and I will deliver my sheep from their mouth, that they may not be food for them.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.