Ezekiel 20:12–20

Ezekiel 20:12 · Darby

And I also gave them my sabbaths, to be a sign between me and them, that they might know that I [am] Jehovah that hallow them.

In Ezekiel 20 God answers the elders of Israel with their own history, tracing His dealings with them from Egypt onward. Verse 12 sits inside that account: God gave His sabbaths to a people He had redeemed, so they would know Him as the One who sets them apart.

The place of the verse in the chapter

The chapter traces Israel's sin back to Egypt.

Here the Spirit retraces the sin, and especially the idolatry, of Israel as a nation, from the time they lived in Egypt. Even then they had begun with their idolatry. For His own name's sake God brought them up from there. He gave them His statutes and His sabbaths — the sabbaths also as a token of the covenant between God and the people.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A sign of who they were

The sabbath did more than give tired people a day off.

As well as being a kindness in itself to hard-working people, the Lord gave His sabbath to Israel as a sign between Him and them, a mark of God's people. The law never set up anything new — the tabernacle, the manna, or other special things — without pressing the sabbath again. It was a sign of their being God's people, though in fact they never entered into God's rest, any more than Adam did. There still remains a rest. But that has ceased: they are no longer God's people, except in promise for the future, when they will have their rest by grace.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why was this day fit to carry such weight?

The Sabbath was a "sign," and it was fitted for that purpose in every way. As Exodus first gives it, it is a memorial of God's rest as the Creator, satisfied with the goodness of all His hands had made. In Deuteronomy God commands them to keep it as a people redeemed from slavery in Egypt, and here too the loss of it would be very serious. As the sign of a people set apart to God, they had often accepted all kinds of injury rather than break it themselves.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

A sign between God and Israel only

The word "between" is limiting. A mark that everyone carries marks nobody.

God never gave the sabbath to the Gentile as such, whatever the reasonings of men may be. If a Gentile came and put himself under the wing of Israel, of course he kept the sabbath; but as a Gentile he had nothing to do with it. The sabbath was the Lord's sign to Israel. To argue that God laid it on everyone alike denies that fact in principle, and denies the scripture that states it. How could it be a sign to one if it was the common duty of all?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"The LORD who sanctifies them"

The verse ends with a word worth defining.

The simple meaning of sanctification is setting apart. We may recall that God sanctified the seventh day, the Sabbath. He ordained it to be a day of rest. It was not a question of making the seventh day holy, for sin had not come into the world.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Notice who does the sanctifying here. Israel could not do it for themselves.

It is true that the sabbath rest set up for man bore no fruit for him. Sin, into which he had fallen, kept him from enjoying it. And unless God stepped in with sovereign goodness, communion with Him was now impossible for man. For communion is based on holiness. So we read, "God blessed the seventh day and made it holy." Therefore, to give His people the enjoyment of the forfeited sabbath, God must take their sanctification upon Himself.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The gift they treated as nothing

The verses that follow show what Israel did with the sign.

When out of Egypt, Israel was no better than when in it; their evil became more obvious and less excusable. They were alone in the wilderness with the Lord, yet they sought false gods. They had His statutes and ordinances, yet they did not walk by them but despised them. They had His sabbaths as a sign between Him and them, yet they profaned them badly. They sinned against His own name so proudly and so persistently, yet that name was their shelter and defence.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where the sign now stands

So what became of the sign after Christ came?

These sabbaths could not go on being kept as a Jewish sabbath under the commandments. Once Christ was crucified, God no longer sanctified the Jewish people. The Lord showed this beforehand, again and again during His ministry, by the way He acted and spoke on the sabbath days.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — God handed the sabbath to Israel, along with His statutes, after He brought them out of Egypt.

- Sign — It marked Israel as His own, a token of the covenant between the Lord and them. God never laid it on the nations.

- Sanctify — To sanctify is to set apart. God claims that work as His own, because a people who had forfeited rest could never make it for themselves.

- Polluted — Israel profaned the very sign of God's nearness. Only His care for His own name stood between them and destruction.

- Rest — The sign pointed to God's rest, which Israel never entered. Commentators link its end to the cross, yet a rest still remains, promised for the future by grace.

Ezekiel 20:13 · Darby

But the house of Israel rebelled against me in the wilderness they walked not in my statutes, and they rejected mine ordinances, which if a man do, he shall live by them; and my sabbaths they greatly profaned and I said I would pour out my fury upon them in the wilderness, to consume them.

Israel's elders came to Ezekiel for a word from God, and God answered with their own family history instead. Verse 13 is its wilderness chapter: a rescued people receive God's statutes and sabbaths, break both, and still escape destruction.

Why God answers with history

God would not give them a fresh message. One commentator explains why, and why God sent them back to their fathers instead.

He who searches the mind and the heart saw that there was no exercise of conscience before Him. Why answer where there is only hollowness and hypocrisy? Such trifling was beneath Him, and He would allow it no longer. "As I live, I will not let you enquire of Me any longer." At the same time He is pleased to justify His ways. If the prophet is to plead for them or take them to task, God directs him to set before them the detestable things their fathers did. So God goes to the source of the trouble, and the people must judge the evil not just in its effects but where it starts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Worse in the wilderness

Israel left Egypt behind, but not their idols.

When out of Egypt, Israel was no better than when in it; in fact, their evil became more evident and less excusable. They were alone with Jehovah in the wilderness, yet they sought false gods. They had His statutes and ordinances, yet they did not follow them but despised them. They had His sabbaths as a sign between Him and them, yet they badly profaned them. So Jehovah was again provoked to destroy Israel in the desert, as He had been in Egypt. His own name, against which they sinned so proudly and stubbornly, was their shelter and defence.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer sets their rebellion beside what God went on doing for them:

They continued in stubbornness and rebellion and became idolaters. But oh, the mercy of God! He continued to feed them and gave them water.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

"If a person does them, he shall live"

The statutes they despised came with a promise of life for the one who kept them. Israel's trouble began with what they promised at Sinai.

While in Egypt, and until Israel undertook to keep the law, God had dealt with His people in grace. But at the foot of Sinai they bound themselves in a covenant of blood to keep every commandment of the law, not realising how helpless and sinful they were. Had they kept the law, they would have lived. By breaking it they brought themselves under its curse. The law they could not keep exposed their self-will and their ignorance of themselves.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Yet there is a sense in which those words still stand today:

Man lives by the word of God — in obedience to it… Because sin is in everyone, the legal covenant had no life in it. Yet there is another sense in which "if a person does them, he shall live" is to be understood. There really is a path of life, though grace alone can put us in it or keep us there. Eternal life and disobedience are opposites. The gospel does not change this: grace fully affirms it.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What it meant to profane the sabbaths

The sabbath mattered because of what it stood for.

The sabbath was a lasting sign that Jehovah had set that people apart for Himself. No other nation kept it as Israel was told to keep it. So Jehovah says to the sons of Israel, without mentioning the other nine commandments at all, "You shall keep my Sabbaths, for it is a sign between me and you throughout your generations, that you may know that I am the LORD who sanctifies you." It was to be a perpetual covenant, a sign for ever (Ex. 31:12-17). Long afterwards Ezekiel the priest points back to this sign, when God charges Israel with polluting the sabbaths and so walking in the ways of the nations.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The sign was also an offer, not a burden:

His sabbaths were the seal upon all these, a sign between God and them of the rest which He designed for them. He was not a hard taskmaster, but their gracious Deliverer. He would always point them to that rest — for themselves and even for the cattle with them. It was a reminder of the rest God took at creation, when He was satisfied with the perfect goodness of all He had made.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why the fury never fell

The threat was real. What held it back was not anything in Israel.

In His counsels of grace, the honour of Jehovah's Name was tied to the blessing of His people. Not even the wickedness of Israel could turn Him from what He had purposed and set His hand to do. In mercy He withdraws the hand He had lifted in judgment. He considers what their enemies would make of the destruction of His people. But He is not only merciful, He is also righteous. Because of their rebellion He said, "I also swore to them in the wilderness that I would scatter them among the nations."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Gift. God gave statutes that promised life to anyone who kept them. He gave sabbaths as the sign that He was setting Israel apart for Himself.

- Guilt. In the wilderness they had His word, His sign and His presence. They chased other gods anyway, so their sin had less excuse than in Egypt.

- Exposure. At Sinai they promised to keep the whole law. The law they could not keep exposed their self-will and brought a curse instead of life.

- Restraint. They deserved the fury, and God held it back. His own Name, not their record, stood between them and destruction.

- Discipline. Mercy spared them; righteousness still scattered them. The Name that shelters also corrects.

Ezekiel 20:14 · Darby

But I wrought for my name's sake, that it should not be profaned in the sight of the nations, in whose sight I had brought them out.

In Ezekiel 20 God retraces His whole history with Israel, starting back in Egypt. Verse 14 gives His reason for not destroying them in the desert: the honour of His own name in front of the watching nations.

The rebellion that deserved destruction

The verse before this one is a threat to destroy Israel. Leaving Egypt had not made them any better.

When out of Egypt, Israel was no better than when in it; in fact their evil became more evident and less excusable. They were alone in the wilderness with Jehovah, yet they sought false gods. They had His statutes and ordinances, yet they did not walk by them but despised them. They had His sabbaths as a sign between Him and them, yet they deeply profaned them. So Jehovah was again provoked to destroy Israel in the desert, as He had been in Egypt. Their shelter and defence was His own name — the very name they sinned against so proudly and so persistently.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What is contained in the name

Why would God's name be a reason to spare rebels?

Immediate destruction is the work of justice. Full and final preservation is the glorious and vital work of divine grace — grace reigning through righteousness. If God had dealt with the people in mere justice, He would not have declared His name. There is far more in His name than justice. There is love, mercy, goodness, kindness, long-suffering, deep and unfailing compassion. But no one could have seen any of this if He had destroyed the people in a moment. Then the name of Jehovah would not have been declared or glorified.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

In whose sight He brought them out

The nations "in whose sight" He acted had watched Israel leave Egypt. Moses had already prayed on that very ground.

Moses knew the heart of Jehovah when he interceded for Israel, saying, "O LORD, why does your wrath burn hot against your people… Why should the Egyptians say, 'With evil intent did he bring them out, to kill them in the mountains and to consume them from the face of the earth'? Turn from your burning anger and relent from this disaster against your people."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

This is not God guarding a reputation apart from His people.

God is not simply glorious and bound to maintain His glory. He has taken a people on the earth, and He has tied His glory to that people. Faith feels this, with a deep and thankful sense of it, and counts on deliverance and grace. God delivers, and so secures His own glory.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the prayer of Moses worked

Moses pleaded and God relented. But the weight in the plea was not the pleader.

How delightful the intercession of Moses must have been to the Lord, for His faithful servant spoke exactly what was in His own heart. Moses' thoughts and words mirrored God's own thoughts and compassions. God listens to His servant, and his pleadings turn God from the fierceness of His wrath. Yet no amount of intercession could have turned away God's wrath if He had not cared about the honour of His great Name.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Spared, but not let off

Mercy in verse 14 did not cancel God's government. So what became of that generation?

So God forgave Israel, and acted for His Name's sake. But there was also the righteous government of God, which He speaks about to Ezekiel… The way He governed the rebellious proved His Name as a merciful God, for that generation died off little by little in the wilderness.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A refrain, not a one-off

The same reason shapes the whole chapter, not just this verse.

Here the Spirit retraces the sin, and especially the idolatry of Israel as a people, from the time of their stay in Egypt. Even then they had begun with their idolatry. For His own name's sake God brought them up from there, and gave them His statutes and His sabbaths… But Israel rebelled against God in the wilderness, and even then He had thought to destroy them… Still, for His name's sake, God withdrew His hand because of the nations who had watched Him bring the people up from Egypt.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same phrase reaches past Israel:

We know that He has forgiven our sins, and as 1 John 2:12 says, it is "for His name's sake." We owe every blessing we already enjoy, and everything that awaits us in the coming day, to the sovereign love of God.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. Out of Egypt, Israel was no better than in it. They had His statutes and His sabbaths, and despised both.

- Shelter. The very name they sinned against became their shelter. Justice alone would have destroyed them in a moment and never shown the love, mercy and long-suffering in that name.

- Witnesses. He held back because of who was watching. The nations had seen Him bring Israel out, and would have said He led them out only to kill them.

- Limit. Sparing was not excusing. That same generation still died off little by little in the wilderness under God's government.

- Reach. The same reason runs on past Israel. God forgives believers today "for His name's sake" too.

Ezekiel 20:15 · Darby

And I also lifted up my hand unto them in the wilderness, that I would not bring them into the land that I had given [them], flowing with milk and honey, which is the ornament of all lands;

In this chapter God retells Israel's own history — Egypt, the wilderness, the land. Here He swears that the generation He rescued will never set foot in the land He had promised them. How can a God who keeps His promises also swear to withhold them?

Why the Sentence Was Just

The chapter traces a people whose sin grew worse, not better, once they were out of Egypt. One writer sets the failure of verse 15 against everything God had just given them.

When out of Egypt, Israel was no better than when in it; indeed, their evil became more obvious and less excusable. They were alone in the wilderness with Jehovah, yet they sought false gods. They had His statutes and ordinances, yet they did not walk by them but despised them. They had His sabbaths as a sign between Him and them, yet they profaned them badly. So Jehovah was again provoked to destroy Israel in the desert, as He had been in Egypt. His own name was their shelter and defence — the very name they sinned against so proudly and stubbornly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Lifted Hand

Where the ESV says God swore, older translations read "I lifted up my hand" — the gesture of taking an oath. The same writer notes how often God returns to that oath.

See how often Jehovah reminds His people of His oath! He swore by Himself, since He could swear by no one greater. In this way He wanted to show more fully that His purpose never changes. It is of Israel in particular that the apostle declares the gifts and calling of God are not subject to a change of mind. For this very reason He judges, and must judge, their ways. Otherwise He would have to approve or excuse sin.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same hand that swore to give the land now swears to keep a rebellious generation out of it.

Mercy Inside the Judgment

A mercy follows the sentence at once: God did not finish them off. One writer holds both sides together.

So God forgave Israel, and worked for His Name's sake. But there was also the righteous government of God, which He speaks of to Ezekiel: "Nevertheless, my eye spared them, and I did not destroy them or make a full end of them in the wilderness." His government of the rebellious proved that His Name is the Name of a merciful God, for that generation died off little by little in the wilderness.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

God pardoned the nation, and the nation still died outside the land.

The Children Brought In

The same writer gives the words of the sentence itself, and what God added about the children.

He pronounced His sentence: "Your dead bodies shall fall in this wilderness." Then He added: "But your little ones, who you said would become a prey, I will bring in, and they shall know the land that you have rejected." These "little ones" are the ones Jehovah speaks of in Ezekiel 20:18: "And I said to their children in the wilderness, Do not walk in the statutes of your fathers, nor keep their rules, nor defile yourselves with their idols."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A Warning Carried Forward

Israel despised the land the verse calls the most glorious of all lands. One writer reads God's refusal as a warning for believers today, and marks where the two cases differ.

"And with whom was He provoked for forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose bodies fell in the wilderness?" Patience bore long through this time of testing. But they had despised the land of promise, and so they died in the wilderness. This is a solemn thought for those who today think little of the heavenly glory of the Lord Jesus Christ and the heavenly calling of His saints. But we must be clear. In the wilderness the issue was only an inheritance on earth and blessings for this life, not the heavenly inheritance and eternal blessings.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Promise Outlives the Oath

The oath shut out one generation. It did not cancel what God had promised to the fathers.

God will then accept them, and they will know Jehovah. The promises to the fathers will be kept — not only in us who now believe and go to heaven at Christ's coming, but in the children of Israel on the earth. They will repent then, and their repentance is real only because of the mercy of Him who acts freely above the evil of His creatures, for His own sake. If He did not act so, to be a sinner would mean ruin beyond remedy or hope.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Raised to give. The lifted hand is God's oath. He swore by Himself, because there was no one greater, and first raised that hand to give Israel the land.

- Raised to withhold. The same hand swore the opposite. Israel had His statutes, His sabbaths and His presence, and despised all three.

- Held back. The hand that could have destroyed them spared them. They died off in the desert little by little, not at a stroke.

- Raised over the children. The generation fell, but God brought in the little ones they had said would be taken as prey.

- Raised again. The oath barred one generation, not the promise. God will still keep His word to the fathers, for His own name's sake.

Ezekiel 20:16 · Darby

because they rejected mine ordinances and walked not in my statutes, and profaned my sabbaths for their heart went after their idols.

Ezekiel 20 is God's review of Israel's whole history. Verse 16 gives the verdict on the generation that died in the desert. It shows why they never reached the land. The verse names three failures of conduct. Under them lies one failure of affection: the heart had gone after idols.

Sin made worse by nearness to God

God brought Israel out of Egypt. He gave them His statutes and His Sabbaths. They still looked elsewhere, and that made their evil less excusable:

When out of Egypt, Israel was no better than when in it; in fact, their evil became more obvious and less excusable. They were alone in the wilderness with Jehovah, yet they sought false gods. They had His statutes and ordinances, yet they did not walk by them but despised them. They had His Sabbaths as a sign between Him and them, yet they greatly profaned them. So once again Israel provoked Jehovah to destroy them in the desert, as they had in Egypt.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The heart, not just the head

The verse lists three outward things, then names the root: the heart. For these people, the problem was never a lack of evidence.

God had been ready to bring that generation into the land He had promised them. But He could not. Their hearts were still after the idols they had watched Him strike down blow after blow. What use is a convinced mind when the heart has chosen to wander!

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The rules that pointed to life

God had shown them miracle after miracle. Yet the charge here is about something else He gave them:

He does not speak here of these miracles, but of the statutes and judgments He had given them, which pointed to the way of life. His Sabbaths were the seal on all of these, a sign between God and them of the rest He intended for them. He was not a hard taskmaster, but their gracious Deliverer. He kept pointing them to that rest — a rest for themselves and even for their cattle. It was the memorial of the creation rest, when God rested Himself, satisfied with the perfect goodness of everything He had made.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The badge they profaned

Of all the ten commandments, this is the one Ezekiel keeps coming back to. The Sabbath did a job the other nine did not do:

They turned their hearts away from Jehovah. They did as they pleased on His holy day, and so profaned His Sabbaths. Scripture declares the Sabbath to be a particular sign of God's covenant with His people. It became a broad, distinctive mark between them and every other nation. Other nations might recognise, to some degree, the great moral landmarks set out on the tablets of stone — no murder, no lust, and so on. But the Sabbath was a lasting sign that Jehovah had separated that people to Himself. Other nations did not keep it as Israel had to keep it. So Jehovah says to the sons of Israel, without mentioning the other nine commandments at all, "You shall keep my Sabbaths, for this is a sign between me and you throughout your generations, that you may know that I, the LORD, sanctify you."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same pattern in the next generation

The next generation did no better than their parents. So what kept judgment back?

Jehovah felt compassion for them. Yet He had to assert His authority, the rightness of His judgments, and the special value of His Sabbaths as something between Him and them. It was in vain! The children in the wilderness were as bad as their fathers who fell. Only one thing stood between Israel and destruction: His own care for the name they were profaning.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Idols that need no statue

A reader who owns no carved image may think this verse cannot touch him. But the test is what holds the affections, not what stands in a shrine.

Someone may say, What is an idol? I will not try to define it. But I am sure I can say this: an idol is whatever creeps into the affections and takes over that unique place in the heart which belongs to God alone.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Gift — God gave statutes that pointed to the way of life, and Sabbaths as their seal. He came as a gracious Deliverer, not a hard taskmaster.

- Sign — the Sabbath was not one rule among ten. It was the mark that Jehovah had set this nation apart for Himself, and they spoiled it.

- Heart — the three failures trace back to one cause. The heart had already gone after idols, and a convinced mind cannot save a heart that has chosen to wander.

- Verdict — nearness made the sin worse, not lighter. Alone in the wilderness with God, they still sought false gods. That generation never entered the land.

- Mercy — only God's concern for His own name kept Israel from destruction. Nothing had changed in their hearts, or in their children's.

Ezekiel 20:17 · Darby

But mine eye spared them so as not to destroy them, neither did I make a full end of them in the wilderness.

In this chapter God retraces Israel's story, from the day He brought them out of Egypt to their rebellion in the wilderness. Here He says He held back from wiping them out — so how can a sentence of death and an act of sparing come from the same God?

Place in the Chapter

One writer traces the steps that led to this moment:

For His own name's sake God had brought them up from Egypt, and given them His statutes and His sabbaths — the sabbaths also as a sign of the covenant between God and the people. But Israel had rebelled against God in the wilderness, and even then He had thought to destroy them. But He spared them, and He warned their children too, who still followed their fathers' ways.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Sentence and Sparing Together

Mercy and judgment are not in conflict here. Both belong to the way God governs a rebellious people:

So God forgave Israel, and acted for His Name's sake. But there was also the righteous government of God, which He describes to Ezekiel… His government of the rebellious vindicated His Name as a merciful God, for that generation died off little by little in the wilderness.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

So the sparing did not cancel the sentence. That generation still died in the desert. God simply did not end the nation there.

What Stood Between Them and Destruction

What held the blow back was not any improvement in the people. The next generation was no better than the last:

Jehovah felt compassion for them. But He had to assert His authority, the rightness of His judgments, and the special value of His sabbaths, as between Him and them. It was all in vain! The children in the wilderness were as bad as their fathers who fell. Nothing but His own care for the name they profaned stood between Israel and destruction.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Spared as a Witness

Love had another reason to hold back:

God's eye had spared them, so as not to destroy them or make a full end of them in the wilderness. Once again He took their children by the hand, telling them not to walk in their fathers' statutes, and not to defile themselves with their idols, for He was Jehovah their God. But they answered as before… Even before they reached the land, He had to threaten them again with the wrath that love and pity held back. They were to be the bearers of His name before the nations. How could He destroy the only thing that remained as a witness at all?

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

God ties His own honour to His people, and that cuts both ways. His name rests on them, so He will not destroy them — and for the same reason He will not ignore their sin:

God delivers and secures His own glory. But for the very same reason God allows no evil, because His name is connected with His people, as we see in Israel: "You only have I known of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Dying in the Wilderness and the Salvation of the Soul

Falling under God's discipline on the road is a different matter from being lost. One writer points to the men who died in the desert and yet belonged to God:

But their falling in the wilderness had nothing to do with the saving of their souls: Moses and Aaron died in the wilderness too, and we know they were saints of Jehovah.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Pattern Still to Be Repeated

The sparing is not only past history. The same chapter looks ahead to a future gathering on the same principle:

They had rebelled on their road to that land in the wilderness. Despite all His grace they had polluted themselves, and God determined to scatter them among the nations. But God would fulfil all His purposes, and would yet re-gather them… As He pleaded with their fathers, and purged them in the wilderness, so would He yet do to the returning house of Israel.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — rebellion. Israel rebelled in the wilderness, and their children walked the same way.

- Restraint — His name. Nothing in the people held back the blow. God's own care for the name they were profaning stood between Israel and destruction.

- Reason — the witness. Love and pity spared a people who were to carry His name before the nations. Destroying them would have left no witness at all.

- Balance — mercy inside government. The sentence still ran, and that generation died in the desert. But God's mercy kept Him from making a full end of them.

- Result — purging, not ending. He pleaded with the fathers and purged them in the wilderness. He will deal the same way with Israel when He gathers them again — for His name's sake, not theirs.

Ezekiel 20:18 · Darby

And I said unto their children in the wilderness, Walk not in the statutes of your fathers, neither keep their ordinances, nor defile yourselves with their idols.

This chapter takes Israel back through their own history — Egypt, the wilderness, the land. Verse 18 is where God turns from the generation that fell and speaks to their children, offering a fresh start to people whose parents had handed them idols.

Who the Children Are

God had already marked out these children. He did it at the very moment He sentenced their parents to die in the desert.

God had kept careful note of the ways of His people. He said to Moses, "None of the men who have seen My glory and My signs, which I did in Egypt and in the wilderness, and yet have put Me to the test these ten times and have not obeyed My voice" (Num. 14:22). Then He passed His sentence: "Your dead bodies shall fall in this wilderness." And He added: "But your little ones, who you said would become a prey, I will bring in, and they shall know the land that you have rejected" (verses 29–31). These "little ones" are those of whom Jehovah speaks in Ezekiel 20:18.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

God Takes Them by the Hand

The warning is not cold. God had just held back from destroying the nation. Now He reaches for the children Himself, and names what had ruined their parents.

God had been ready to bring that generation into the land He had promised them. But He could not. Their hearts were still set on the idols they had seen Him strike down blow after blow. What use is a convinced mind when the heart has chosen to go astray! God's eye had spared them, so He did not destroy them or make a full end of them in the wilderness. Once again He took their children by the hand, saying: "Do not walk in the statutes of your fathers, nor keep their rules, nor defile yourselves with their idols: I am Jehovah your God." … They again refused the statutes that their own consciences approved. They profaned the sabbaths, the sign of the rest He wanted for them.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Two Sets of Statutes

The verse sets one word against itself. There are "statutes" belonging to the fathers, and there are statutes belonging to God — and the children are told to leave the first and take the second.

Jehovah felt deep compassion. But He must still assert His authority, the rightness of His judgments, and the special value of His sabbaths, in His dealings with them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same pattern runs through the whole chapter: a warning given, a warning ignored, and God acting on a motive found in Himself rather than in them.

But Israel had rebelled against God in the wilderness, and even then He had thought to destroy them. But He spared them, warning at the same time their children also, who nevertheless followed their fathers' ways. Still, for His name's sake, God withdrew His hand on account of the heathen in whose sight He had brought the people up from Egypt.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Appeal Refused

The next verses say plainly how they answered. The fresh generation turned out to be the old one over again.

Jehovah calls this second generation to give up the ways of their fathers and to walk in His ways. Sadly, they were just like their fathers. The Lord has to say of them, "But the children rebelled against Me. They did not walk in My statutes and were not careful to obey My rules" (Ezek. 20:21).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Kelly names the one thing that kept the nation alive: "The children in the wilderness were as bad as their fathers who fell. Nothing but His own care for the name they profaned stood between Israel and destruction" (William Kelly).

Inherited Religion

The command still bites today. It cuts at any way of life we keep only because someone handed it down to us. Writers note how comfortable that is, and what it costs.

It is always easier to follow tradition than the written word of God. Doing so does not exercise the conscience, and it saves us the difficulty — sometimes a serious one — of giving reasons for what we do. It is enough that we have been brought up from infancy to believe and practise certain things, and to walk in a certain path. If it was right and good for our elders, why not for us? … What has been handed down from father to son may not be bad in itself. It may even have been good, at least for its time. But it sets up a false standard and a human authority in the soul. Even if that authority does not deny the authority of the word of God, it will certainly put it in second place.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Spared — these children are the "little ones." God promised to bring them into the land while their parents' bodies fell in the desert.

- Summoned — He takes them by the hand and names the break He wants: their fathers' statutes, rules and idols, all left behind.

- Standard — in place of their fathers' ways God presses His own authority, His judgments and His sabbaths, the sign of the rest He wanted for them.

- Stubborn — the children answered just as their parents had. A new setting does not change a heart.

- Sustained — what kept Israel standing was not their answer but God's care for the name they had profaned.

Ezekiel 20:19 · Darby

I [am] Jehovah your God walk in my statutes, and keep mine ordinances, and do them;

Ezekiel 20 opens with Israel's elders coming to ask God for a word. Instead of an answer, they get their own family history read back to them — Egypt, the wilderness, the land. Verse 19 sits in the wilderness part of that history. There God turns from the generation that fell and speaks fresh terms to their children.

Why the past is rehearsed

The men in front of Ezekiel were the recognised leaders, and God's refusal to be consulted by them is followed by a long recital of what their fathers did.

What right do they have to inquire of Him? He has set fully before them the terms on which He alone can be with them. The prophets God raised up pressed those terms on them again and again, and all that time they broke them. Their own consciences would witness that their hearts were untrue in the inquiry itself. So there was nothing to do but remind them of their fathers' evil ways: they would find in them a mirror of their own.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The children in the wilderness

Who are the "children" God speaks to here? God had already marked them out when their parents were sentenced.

God had noted the ways of His people with care. He said to Moses that all those men had seen His glory and His miracles in Egypt and in the wilderness, and had still put Him to the test ten times and had not obeyed His voice (Num. 14:22). Then He passed sentence: their dead bodies would fall in that wilderness. But He added that He would bring in the little ones they had said would become a prey, and they would know the land they had rejected (verses 29–31). These "little ones" are the ones Jehovah speaks of in Ezekiel 20:18.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A second chance, not a softer standard

Why did God speak fresh terms to a second generation at all? And why does He ask for walking, and not only for agreement?

God had been ready to bring that generation into the land He had promised them. He could not, because their hearts were still set on the idols they had seen Him strike blow after blow. How useless that a man's mind should be convinced when his heart is deliberately astray! God's eye spared them, so He did not destroy them or make a full end of them in the wilderness. Once again He took their children by the hand.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

What "I am the LORD your God" carries

That short sentence is not an aside before the commands. It is the ground they stand on.

Jehovah had brought them into a certain relationship with Himself, and that relationship had its own privileges and responsibilities. "I am the LORD your God." This was to be the ground of their conduct. They were to act in a way worthy of the One who had become their God, and made them His people. It was not that they were any better than other people. By no means.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Statutes given as a kindness

So what are these statutes for, and what do they say about the God who gave them?

It is not of His miracles that He speaks here, but of the statutes and judgments which He had given them, which pointed to the way of life. His sabbaths were the seal on all these, a sign between God and them of the rest which He designed for them. He was not a hard taskmaster, but their gracious Deliverer.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The call refused, the nation spared

How did this generation answer, and why did the nation survive?

Jehovah was moved with compassion. But He had to assert His authority, the rightness of His judgments, and the special value of His sabbaths, as between Him and them. In vain! The children in the wilderness were as bad as their fathers who fell. Only His own care for the name they profaned stood between Israel and destruction.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Mirror — The elders wanted a word about their future. God held up their fathers' record, so they would see their own faces in it.

- Children — The new word goes to the children of the generation that fell — the "little ones" God promised to bring in.

- Ground — "I am the LORD your God" comes first: the relationship is the reason for the conduct, not a reward for it.

- Life — The statutes He asks them to walk in pointed to the way of life; the Giver is their Deliverer, not a hard taskmaster.

- Name — The children answered like their fathers. Only God's care for His own name kept the nation from destruction.

Ezekiel 20:20 · Darby

and hallow my sabbaths; and they shall be a sign between me and you, that ye may know that I [am] Jehovah your God.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.