And the wicked, if he turn from all his sins which he hath committed, and keep all my statutes, and do judgment and justice, he shall certainly live, he shall not die.
Israel complained that they were suffering for their fathers' sins. God answers by dealing with each person on his own account. Verse 21 is the bright side of that answer: the door is not shut on the wicked man, if he will turn.
At the captivity God changed the ground on which He dealt with His people.
This deserves careful weighing. At the captivity God acts on the complaining of His people. He stops dealing with them any longer on the ground of Exodus 34:6-7. From now on He would take them on their own terms. They complained that it was hard to suffer for their fathers' failures. So He would now give them what they themselves deserved. It is clear that a sinner must suffer for sin. He may question the justice of paying the penalty for a parent's evil. But he cannot deny that he deserves punishment for his own.
The death threatened here is not the final judgment. The whole chapter deals with God's rule over His people on earth.
The individual would be dealt with by God according to his own conduct. It is not a question of what their fathers had been. Their own iniquities demanded and would bring on God's judgment... yet where repentance was clear, God would pardon, for He had no pleasure in the death of the wicked (Ezek. 18:23). Keep in mind that this speaks of judgment in this life: physical death, because of sin now. It gives us no teaching about the eternal judgment of sin, which Scripture teaches elsewhere.
The verse asks for a break with all his sins, and for God's statutes kept from that day on.
In either case, the judgment must be according to the end of the trial. God does not remember former sin or former righteousness. Past sin will not spoil the present righteousness a man has turned to. Past righteousness will not cancel present sin either.
God makes this promise to a man who already deserves the name wicked, and He means it.
This declares a way of salvation, too — not simply a righteousness that needs none. It speaks of the wicked man — the man the name already fits, and who as such needs salvation. God announces forgiveness of sins for him... So God pledges His mercy to a returning soul. And of course He must mean it in all sincerity and truth, or it could not come from Him.
Behind the offer stands God's own disposition toward the guilty.
God would pardon the repenting sinner. For He has no pleasure in the sinner's death. The government of Israel on earth is still the subject. Everyone shall be judged according to his ways.
The offer is real. But it puts a man's future on his own conduct, and so it tests what is in his heart.
It was a further test — a milder one — to prove whether it was in man's heart or will to turn to God, and serve and obey Him. It was as though God said, I will not enforce the claims of My law to the letter. It claims unbroken and universal obedience. That you have utterly failed to render, and the law knows nothing of repentance. But now I give you an opportunity to begin again... It was a fair offer: wipe out all the past and begin again. And God made this offer, remember, to people who were complaining that their destinies were not in their own hands.
Commentators draw a sharp line between this offer and salvation in Christ.
Yet this is not the salvation which we find in Christ. Its condition is not faith in Him but works: to get it, a man must have a righteousness that comes by works. Faith and works are two principles that cannot be joined. So it will not do to say that faith in Christ is present here even though the verse does not mention it.
- Cause. Israel blamed their fathers for their suffering. So God set that older arrangement aside and dealt with each person by his own conduct.
- Gift. God promises the man already called wicked a real pardon. He will not bring up his past against him.
- Scope. The life and death here belong to God's dealings on earth now. Scripture teaches the final judgment elsewhere.
- Test. The offer rests on turning from sin and keeping God's statutes. That is a fair trial of the human will, not salvation by faith in Christ.
- Result. Judgment goes by how the trial ends. Neither past sin nor past righteousness settles it.
None of his transgressions which he hath committed shall be remembered against him; in his righteousness which he hath done shall he live.
Ezekiel speaks to exiles who blamed their fathers for their misery, and God answers by dealing with each person on his own account. Verse 22 is His promise to the one who turns: his record is dropped, and he lives — but what life is meant, and is he earning it?
The exiles complained that they were suffering for their fathers' failures. God ends that complaint by taking them at their word.
This deserves careful thought. At the captivity God acts on the murmuring of His people. He ends the way He had governed them under Exodus 34:6-7. From now on He would take them on their own terms. They complained about suffering for their fathers' failures, so He would now give them what they themselves deserved. Clearly a sinner must suffer for sin. And if a man challenges the justice of paying the penalty for a parent's evil, he cannot deny that he ought to be punished for his own.
The rule runs the other way too. A righteous man who turns to evil loses the credit of his good record.
In either case, the judgment must follow how the trial ends. Neither former sin nor former righteousness can be remembered. That is, past sin will not make the present righteousness a man has turned to worthless. And past righteousness will not cancel his present sin. We must remember through all this that God is not speaking of the final account in eternity. He is speaking of a man entering now into His favour, or coming now under His judgment, in the way He governs.
How far does this promise reach? That depends on which death the chapter threatens.
The individual would be dealt with by God according to his own conduct. It is not a question of what their fathers had been. Their own sins called for God's judgment and would bring it on them. Long before, God had threatened to visit the sins of the fathers on the children (see Ex. 34:7). Now He sets that principle aside. Each man was guilty in himself, and as such would be judged. Still, where a man showed repentance, God would pardon, for He had no pleasure in the death of the wicked (Ezek. 18:23). Keep in mind that this speaks of judgment in this life — physical death, because of sin now. It teaches us nothing about the eternal judgment of sin, which is taught elsewhere.
Whatever its limits, the promise is no formality. God pledges Himself to the man who comes back.
This is the voice of God through the prophet Ezekiel, and every word of God will stand. He declares a way of salvation, too — not simply a righteousness that needs none. He speaks of the wicked man, the man who can already be called that, and who therefore needs salvation. God announces forgiveness of sins for him... So the mercy of God is pledged to a returning soul: and, of course, one must say, in all sincerity and truth, or it could not be from Him.
The verse says he lives "for the righteousness that he has done." Those are the terms — and they are not the terms on which a sinner is saved through Christ.
Yet this is not the salvation we find in Christ. Its condition is not faith in Him but works. To get it, a man must have a righteousness that comes from works. Faith and works are two principles that cannot be joined. So it will not do to say that faith in Christ, though not named here, must still be present.
Held out this way, the offer tests whether anyone can recover himself:
This is not pure law. It is law softened and tempered by mercy, giving man, who has failed, the means of self-recovery — if self-recovery were possible. But it was not possible for them, and is not possible for anyone.
Yet forgiveness did not erase every consequence in the life of King David.
We must also remember that in a case like David's sin, the sin might still have to be remembered, as far as outward experience goes, even when it had been forgiven and the soul was once more in the unclouded favour of God... He must maintain His character, and show that He cannot pass over evil in the lives of His own people just because they are His. So the sword was never to depart from David's house.
- Protest — They complained of suffering for their fathers. God sets that older ground aside and judges each person by his own conduct.
- Pardon — For the one who turns, God does not bring up past sins; even so, the outward consequences of past sin may still remain.
- Pledge — The offer is genuine mercy, made in sincerity and truth, because it comes from God.
- Perimeter — The life and death here belong to God's government on earth, not to the final account in eternity.
- Point beyond — The condition named is works, not faith in Christ. So the passage shows that no one can recover himself; it does not give the gospel.
Have I any pleasure at all in the death of the wicked? saith the Lord Jehovah; is it not in his turning from his way, that he may live?
Israel blamed their fathers for their own ruin. Ezekiel 18 answers that excuse, and in the middle of the argument God asks a question about His own heart — one that leaves the guilty with no one else to blame.
This question sits inside a chapter about who carries the blame for sin: the fathers, or the people themselves.
Ezekiel 18 contains an important principle of the dealings of God, revealed at that time. God would judge the individual according to his own conduct. The wicked nation was judged as such, and not, in fact, for the sin of the fathers... Each soul belonged to the Lord one by one, and each would bear the judgment of its own sins. God would pardon the repenting sinner. For He has no pleasure in the sinner's death.
Which death is in view here? The answer sets a limit on how far the verse can be pushed.
The individual would be dealt with by God according to his own conduct... Each one was guilty, and each would be judged. Still, where repentance appeared, God would pardon, for He had no pleasure in the death of the wicked (Ezek. 18:23). Keep in mind that He speaks here of temporal judgment, physical death, because of sin now. It gives us no teaching about the eternal judgment of sin, which is taught elsewhere.
People still say God's dealings are unfair. That complaint says more about the one who makes it — and it misses what kind of appeal this chapter is making.
Those who find fault with the ways of the Lord in mercy or in judgment have never seen themselves in His light... The call here is a call to conscience. It is not the call of grace, where God promises to give them a new heart and put a new spirit within them (Ezek. 36)...
God says the same thing elsewhere, and there He puts it under an oath.
It is not because judgment is His delight... "Say to them, As I live, declares the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that the wicked turn from his way and live; turn back, turn back from your evil ways, for why will you die, O house of Israel?" If God pleaded like this with Israel long ago, we may be sure He is no more willing to execute judgment now... Where He foretells those judgments in the most solemn terms, He speaks of rising up to do His work — His strange work — and to bring about His act, His strange act.
If that is God's sworn desire, why do any perish? The answer raises an old objection about God's power.
The death of Christ for the world shows us that infinite goodness which men have to tear themselves away from — the goodness He swore by when He said He has no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that the wicked should turn from his way and live... Men die because of their own will, not of God's will; yet they die. And men crudely ask of God's omnipotence why He cannot convert them all. But His other attributes must set limits even to omnipotence.
If God says this, then a way of escape must exist.
Since God has said: "Have I any pleasure in the death of the wicked?" (Ezek. 18:23). Has He not also told us that He "desires all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth"? (1 Tim. 2:4)... But over against my sins God has set Christ's one offering. What matchless grace! The costly sacrifice of Calvary has made it possible for God to take every humble and contrite sinner to His heart for ever. The foulest sinner may be pardoned and cleansed by virtue of the Saviour's precious blood.
Ahab, the king the prophet confronted, gave only a passing repentance. God still took account of it.
But the words of the prophet rang in his soul like a death-knell, reached (at least) his natural conscience, and produced a passing repentance... Who can measure the depths of the patience and the mercy of the Lord! "Have I any pleasure in the death of the wicked, declares the Lord GOD, and not rather that he should turn from his way and live?" ... And so, even though this was only a passing humbling, God put off the judgment on Ahab's house until his son's days — though He carried out the personal judgment on Ahab himself and on Jezebel to the letter. Here we are in the sphere of God's government on earth. There was a day of grace even for Ahab.
- His pleasure. God tells us what pleases Him: not the death of the wicked, but his turning and living.
- His oath. He swears it — "As I live" — so no one need doubt what God wants.
- His reach. The offer stops at no one; even Ahab found a day of grace, and the foulest sinner may be cleansed by the blood of Christ.
- His cost. Mercy was not cheap. God takes the contrite sinner to His heart on the ground of Christ's one offering at Calvary.
- Your will. Men die by their own will, not God's — so the question stands over every reader: "Why will you die?"
And when the righteous turneth from his righteousness and practiseth what is wrong, [and] doeth according to all the abominations that the wicked doeth, shall he live? None of his righteous acts which he hath done shall be remembered in his unfaithfulness which he hath wrought, and in his sin which he hath sinned, in them shall he die.
Israel blamed the fathers for the children's suffering, and this chapter puts each person alone before God instead. Verse 24 asks the sharp question: can a good record hold when a man walks away from the life that made it?
The chapter sets out a rule for God's dealings with His people at that time. Their fathers' guilt was not the reason judgment fell on them.
Ezekiel 18 contains an important principle of God's dealings, made clear at that time. God would judge each person according to his own conduct. He judged the wicked nation as a wicked nation. In fact, He did not judge it for the guilt of the fathers. The people's own present sins made the judgment their fathers had deserved fit their actions too... The government of Israel on earth is still the subject. God will judge everyone according to his ways.
Placed beside the previous verses, the case of the righteous man who turns away is the mirror image of the wicked man who turns back. Neither one is carrying anyone else's load.
Supposing the wicked to turn from all his sins, or the righteous from his righteousness, what then? Each must bear his own burden, of the Spirit reaping the blessed and suited results, of the flesh corresponding corruption.
Many people read the word "die" in this chapter as a sentence on the soul forever. Commentators here read it another way.
Notice that everything before us here belongs to God's outward, visible government. It stands out clearly and fits well in Ezekiel's prophecy. So the death threatened to the wicked is not simply the death we all live under. Nor is it, as people commonly suppose, eternal death as the doom of every unrepentant soul. It is a removal from the earth, under the government of God. That government even now works blessing for the upright who walk with Him, as the apostle also tells us: godliness "holds promise for the present life and also for the life to come."
after
The man in view is not sinless. A pattern of conduct marks him out: just dealing, no idols, walking in God's statutes.
First, then, the Lord speaks of His way with a righteous man — not righteous in an absolute sense, as already said, but marked out as such: "If a man is righteous and does what is just and right... if he does not eat upon the mountains or lift up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel... walks in my statutes, and keeps my rules by acting faithfully — he is righteous; he shall surely live, declares the Lord GOD." This completely overturned the proverb Israel was using. Their ancestry was not the question; each one was responsible for himself.
after
The verse says that none of his righteous deeds "shall be remembered." The rule runs both ways. God weighs where a man ends up, not where he once stood.
In either case, the judgment must go by the end of the trial. God does not remember former sin or former righteousness. Past sin will not make the righteousness a man has now turned to useless, and past righteousness will not cancel his present sin. Remember through all of this: the subject is not the final account in eternity. It is entering now into God's favor, or coming now under His judgment, in His government.
The warning is real, but it is not the loudest note here.
So if even a man who had been righteous trusted in that past righteousness and gave himself up to wickedness, God could remember none of his righteous deeds. He would surely die in the wrong he had done. But the greater emphasis falls on the mercy waiting for even the worst and vilest person who turns to God.
King Rehoboam started well and ended badly. God's verdict on him follows this verse.
Scripture sums up Rehoboam's life in the words, "he did evil." But did he not walk wisely during the first three years of his reign? Yes, but the prophet says, "When a righteous person turns away from his righteousness... None of the righteous deeds that he has done shall be remembered." His wise days go unmentioned, and God's judgment on him is "he did evil."
The verse is often produced to prove a Christian can be lost. One writer answers that objection directly by naming the confusion behind it.
It shows a sad lack of spiritual understanding to bring in such passages of Scripture as bearing in any way on the final perseverance of Christ's members. These, and countless other scriptures in the Old Testament, and similar passages in the New Testament, open up the very important subject of God's moral government. To be only a subject of God's government is one thing. To be a subject of His unchangeable grace is another. We should never confuse the two.
Another writer draws the same line between the two covenants.
Carefully distinguish between the Old Covenant which demanded righteousness, and the New which bestows God's righteousness. See John 1:17; Rom. 3:10, 19-24; Rom. 9:30-32; Rom. 10:2-4.
- Individual. Each person stands on his own conduct. A son does not inherit his father's account.
- Governmental. The "death" here is God's dealing on earth with those under His rule. Commentators read it as removal from this life, not as the eternal sentence.
- Present. God carries forward no old record, good or bad. His verdict follows where a man stands at the end of the trial.
- Merciful. The same rule that cancels past righteousness also cancels past sin. That open door for the worst is what the chapter presses hardest.
- Distinct. Life under God's government is one thing. Life under His unchangeable grace is another. The Old Covenant demanded righteousness; the New gives God's righteousness.