Exodus 7:14–11:10

Exodus 7:14 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Pharaoh's heart is hardened he refuseth to let the people go.

God's word to Moses here is a verdict, not a question: Pharaoh's heart is set, and he will not release Israel. A long chain of judgments on Egypt follows, and the verse raises the hardest question in the whole account: who hardened Pharaoh's heart?

A heart already fixed

The statement comes after Pharaoh has already seen a sign and turned from it. Commentators watch the order closely. Get it backwards and you misrepresent God.

In Exodus 7 the great struggle begins, and wonder after wonder falls on the doomed land of Egypt. Notice this about the hardening of Pharaoh's heart. It was in no way the case before Pharaoh openly declared his unbelief. God never compelled a man to be an unbeliever. In short, unbelief never begins as the result of God's judicial hardening. Is there then no such thing as hardening? Does not Scripture mean that there is? Undoubtedly there is hardening. There are two equal errors. One says God hardens a person when He first sends a testimony. The other denies that He hardens a person who has refused that testimony.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two words, two stages

The Hebrew does not use one word here. The change of word tracks a change in who is acting.

"But I will harden Pharaoh's heart." This was stated before in chapter 4:21. Eighteen times we read of the hardening of Pharaoh's heart. However, different words are used in the Hebrew to show an important distinction. One means to "make firm" or "strong." The other means "to make stubborn." Together these two words show Pharaoh hardening his own heart, and God hardening him after he continued in his wicked way. Scripture says five times that Pharaoh hardened his heart. Only then did God begin His hardening and make Pharaoh's heart stubborn. Pharaoh hardened himself, then God hardened him. Pharaoh had his opportunities, and because he refused and continued in unbelief, God made him stubborn. This holds a solemn warning. Thousands harden their hearts now.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What the hardening means

The plain words need no softening. They describe God withdrawing, not God forcing.

This explains an expression that occurs very often in the earlier chapters of this book. "The Lord hardened Pharaoh's heart." No one needs to avoid the full, plain sense of this most solemn statement. If man resists the light of divine testimony, he is shut up to judicial blindness and hardness of heart. God leaves him to himself, and then Satan comes in and carries him headlong to destruction. Pharaoh had plenty of light. It showed him the extravagant folly of trying to keep back the people God had commanded him to let go. But the real disposition of his heart was to act against God, and therefore God left him to himself.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why the river is struck first

God answers the refusal with a blow at the centre of Egypt's confidence. The Nile fed the land, and Egypt treated it as divine.

Their general object is clear when we remember what God's controversy with Pharaoh was about. He dealt with Pharaoh as the oppressor of His people... So first the waters of Egypt are turned into blood, the symbol of death and judgment. This meant above all the sacred Nile. It was the source of life and refreshment to Egypt and its people, from the king down to the humblest of his subjects. As a result, "the fish in the Nile died, and the Nile stank, so that the Egyptians could not drink water from the Nile. There was blood throughout all the land of Egypt." So the river they proudly boasted in as an emblem of God became an object of disgust and loathing.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The timing sharpens it. Pharaoh was on his way to the river that morning.

Those who have studied the records of ancient Egypt tell us that the Egyptians worshipped the Nile as representing one of the chief gods of that land of idols. And remember that when the river was struck under the first plague, Pharaoh was going in the same direction that morning. It gives us the impression that he was going out to worship the Nile-god, and just at that moment his god was smitten.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Warning before the blow

God does not strike without notice. Pharaoh heard the plague described before it fell.

The first plague God sent was announced beforehand to Pharaoh... Then he announced to Pharaoh that he would strike the waters of the river so that they might become blood... The announcement had no effect on Pharaoh, and the Lord commanded Moses to do just what he had warned.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal first. Pharaoh's unbelief comes before any hardening from God. God never compels a man to be an unbeliever.

- Then hardening. The Hebrew shifts from "make firm" to "make stubborn." Pharaoh hardened himself first, and only then did God harden him.

- Left to himself. God leaves the man who has resisted clear light. He does not force a will that wanted otherwise.

- Then judgment. God answers the refusal at Egypt's source of life. The Nile, which Egypt worshipped as a god, becomes blood — the symbol of death.

- Yet warned. God announces every blow in advance. The warning is real mercy, and Pharaoh's indifference measures his heart.

Exodus 7:15 · Darby

Go unto Pharaoh in the morning -- behold, he will go out unto the water -- and take thy stand by the bank of the river in front of him; and take in thy hand the staff that was turned into a serpent.

God tells Moses where to stand, when to arrive, and what to carry. The appointment is at the water's edge, with the most powerful man on earth. Every detail carries weight: the hour, the place, and the staff in Moses' hand.

Why the River

Pharaoh's early walk to the water was not a stroll. Commentators suggest it was an act of worship. If so, God timed His first blow to fall on the god the king came to honour.

Those who have studied the records of ancient Egypt tell us that the Egyptians worshipped the Nile as standing for one of the chief gods of that land of idols. And we remember that when the river was struck under the first plague, Pharaoh was going in the same direction in the morning. It gives us the impression that he was going out to worship the Nile-god. Just at that moment his god was struck.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Another writer adds that the season may have made the occasion even grander:

This particular morning visit was probably for a religious ceremony in honour of the god. There seems good ground for the suggestion that it was the time of the yearly flood, the time of the Red Nile. That is the time when the waters take on a reddish colour, because of the deposits carried down from the mountains far to the south. So Pharaoh's visit to the river would be of the most imposing grandeur.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The Staff in Moses' Hand

God names the staff by what it once became. In Scripture a rod stands for authority. Its change into a serpent pictured what authority had become in Egypt.

The point of this wonder was the change of power (which a "rod" means in scripture) into something Satanic. The rod is the symbol of authority; it may also represent chastening. But no chastening is right unless it comes from just authority. So this sign joins the two ideas. The rod of power taking Satanic form seems to be meant by the sign first given to Moses. Such was exactly the state of things in the land of Egypt.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Carried in front of Pharaoh, that staff spoke a language Egypt already knew.

The rod in the East is a symbol of authority and power... The old monuments of Egypt in hundreds of cases show gods and men with sceptre-like rods in their hands... Satan had the power and the authority. Jehovah would hand them to Moses as His servant, and as the story goes on, it often says that Moses had the rod of God. Serpents appear everywhere on the temples of Egypt. The first divine sign was clear: the rod of God in the hand of the deliverer would win the victory. The serpent's power would be broken before Jehovah.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Warned Before the Blow

Nothing falls on Egypt by surprise. God announces the blow first and gives the king a chance to yield.

God announced the first plague to Pharaoh beforehand. He told Moses that Pharaoh would go out in the morning to the river. He told Moses to stand there with the rod that had become a serpent, and to repeat His demand that Pharaoh let Israel go.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

This morning meeting sets a pattern that runs through the judgments.

Jehovah opened each of the three series of plagues by commanding Moses to meet Pharaoh "in the morning," at the start of a day. Moses and Aaron opened the second plague of each series by visiting Pharaoh. The third came without warning. An orderly design governs each series.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The Real Dispute

Moses comes with a demand, not a plea. Two owners claim the same people.

The word to him was, "Let My people go…" So the Lord at once claimed the people as His. But for a century or two the Pharaohs of Egypt had regarded the people as theirs, and as their slaves. So from the outset the issue was joined. Jehovah claimed the people that Pharaoh regarded as his own. Which claimant would prevail? The issue could not be in doubt for one moment.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the Blow Meant

Striking the Nile struck Egypt where it lived. Its water supply and its god were the same river.

The river watered the land through its many channels. It was the very sign of their independence from heaven — they adored it as a god, and yet could claim it as their own making. That river was turned into blood, so that they could not drink of it. The support of life becomes the very symbol of death... It is, in fact, not merely nature rising up, but penalty from the Creator of nature — death from the Life-giver.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Place — The meeting is set at the water Pharaoh came to honour, so the first blow falls on the god he was going out to worship.

- Rod — The staff that became a serpent pictured authority turned Satanic. Now that rod is in the deliverer's hand, and it will win.

- Warning — God announces the plague before it lands. This "in the morning" meeting opens each of the three series of judgments.

- Claim — Behind the sign lies a demand: God claims as His own the people Pharaoh calls his property.

- Result — Egypt's source of life becomes the symbol of death. This is not nature rising up, but death sent from the Life-giver.

Exodus 7:16 · Darby

And say unto him, Jehovah the God of the Hebrews has sent me to thee, saying, Let my people go, that they may serve me in the wilderness; but behold, hitherto thou hast not hearkened.

Moses meets Pharaoh at the Nile with a demand and a claim: the slaves Egypt owns belong to Someone else. Everything in the long contest that follows turns on two phrases — "my people" and "that they may serve me."

Whose People Are They?

The demand settles ownership before a single plague falls. It sets two claimants against each other. (The writers quoted here use "Jehovah" where the ESV has "the LORD.")

The word to him was, "Let My people go …" So the Lord at once claimed the people as His. For a century or two the Pharaohs of Egypt had regarded the people as theirs, and as their slaves. So the dispute began at once. Jehovah claimed the people that Pharaoh regarded as his own. Which claimant would prevail? The issue could not be in doubt for one moment.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

He counts them as His own while they are still slaves.

Israel was God's people, and here He counts up those on whom He had a sovereign claim. Amazing grace! To find an object in those who were in the middle of all the degradation of Egyptian bondage! ... He came down and stood among the brick-kilns of Egypt. There He saw a people groaning under the lash of the taskmasters, and He spoke those memorable words, "Let my people go." Then He counted them up, as much as to say, "These are mine. Let me see how many I have, so that I leave not one behind."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The God of the Hebrews

Moses names the Sender as the God of a slave people. Pharaoh judged gods by how their worshippers fared, so the title sounded absurd to him.

Surrounded by priests and princes, Pharaoh gave a proud reply: "Who is Jehovah, that I should obey His voice to let Israel go? I do not know Jehovah, and I will not let Israel go." Pharaoh knew the gods of his own land and of the nations he had conquered, and he had seen their images. But he knew nothing of Jehovah, the invisible, the eternal. He laughed at the idea of His power. Were not the people of Jehovah Pharaoh's own slaves? If Jehovah, the God of the Hebrews, was really a god, why had He let His worshippers fall under the power of another nation? That nation served gods who stood for Creator, Supreme Ruler, Life Giver, Deliverer and Judge — glories that belong to Jehovah alone.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Freed for Service

The release is not the goal in itself. The dispute is over who gets this people's service.

The dispute was this: would the world-system have the service of God's people, or would that service be for Him alone? This service is priestly in character, and no one could carry it out in the land of Egypt.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Why "In the Wilderness"

The place is part of the demand. Egypt has no room for the worship God asks for.

All true worship of God means separation from the world. The sacrifice of Christ, the atonement which is the basis of all worship, is an abomination in the sight of the world.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The distance itself is a picture. The three days' journey stands for the ground a believer now stands on.

Here is true separation from Egypt — "three days' journey." Nothing less than this could satisfy faith. The Israel of God must leave the land of death and darkness behind, in the power of resurrection... In fact, Israel never offered a single note of praise until the whole congregation stood on the far side of the Red Sea, in the full power of a finished redemption. It is the same now. The believer must know where the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ have set him for ever. Only then can he be an intelligent worshipper, an acceptable servant, or an effective witness.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

"So Far You Have Not Obeyed"

The message notes that Pharaoh, here called Meneptah, has had his chance. What follows is not haste but the end of patience.

Meneptah refused to obey the summons Moses delivered on God's part. He had also rejected the appeal of the Israelites. He truly disbelieved the miracle just worked — otherwise why did he stay stubborn? Other means, punishing in character, would follow, and without long delay. God had given him time to think, but in vain.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The first blow landed where Pharaoh was heading that morning.

Those who have studied the records of ancient Egypt tell us that the Nile was worshipped as standing for one of the chief gods of that land of idols. When the first plague struck the river, Pharaoh was going in the same direction in the morning (Exodus 7:15). It gives us the impression that he was going out to worship the Nile-god, and at that moment his god was struck.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Claim — God calls Israel "my people" while they are still slaves, counting them as His before one of them is free.

- Claimant — Pharaoh held them as his own. The demand set two owners against each other, and the outcome was never in doubt.

- Purpose — The release is for service. The dispute is over who gets their service — the world, or God alone.

- Place — Egypt is no place for that service. Worship needs separation, and the journey out pictures the death and resurrection ground where a believer now stands.

- Consequence — Pharaoh had his time to think and refused. So the first plague struck the river he was walking out to worship.

Exodus 7:17 · Darby

Thus saith Jehovah In this shalt thou know that I am Jehovah -- behold, I will smite with the staff that is in my hand upon the water which is in the river, and it shall be turned into blood.

Pharaoh had asked who the LORD was, and refused to obey Him. God replies at the river: one blow on the water Egypt lived on, and Egypt will know His name.

An answer to Pharaoh's question

Egypt had known God once, through Joseph. Then a later king forgot him and sneered at the God of the Hebrews, and the way God made Himself known changed.

In one way or another He will and must make Himself known, for that is His glory. But He seeks to be known in goodness rather than in judgment, if men will hear... But Egypt forgot Joseph. A king arose there who persecuted Joseph's people, and said of his God, "Who is the LORD, that I should obey Him?" Then the Lord had to publish His name in that land in judgment, saying to the king, "By this you shall know that I am the LORD: behold, I will strike with the staff that is in my hand." He was now to be made known not in Joseph, but in plagues.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The source of life turned into a symbol of death

The first blow fell on the Nile, the water Egypt depended on and worshipped.

The Egyptians adored the river as a god, and yet could claim it as their own making (Ezek. 29:3). Its channels watered the land, and were the very sign that Egypt did not depend on heaven. The river was turned into blood, so that they could not drink of it. The support of life becomes the very symbol of death, and of death by violence, the infliction of the penalty. It is, in fact, not merely nature rising up against them, but penalty from the Creator of nature — death from the Life-giver.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

One writer sets this act beside a miracle of the opposite kind:

He who, at Cana, turned the water into wine to cheer His creatures, turned the water of the Nile into blood in judicial dealing with the Egyptians.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Aimed at Egypt's gods

God timed this blow for the morning, when Pharaoh went down to the water. Egypt worshipped the river he was heading toward.

Those who have studied the records of ancient Egypt tell us that the Nile was worshipped as one of the chief gods of that land of idols. Remember that when the river was struck under the first plague, Pharaoh was going in the same direction in the morning (Exodus 7:15). It gives us the impression that he was going out to worship the Nile-god, and just at that moment his god was struck... This shows us how these judgments affected the gods of Egypt, as indicated in Exodus 12:12.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Announced before it fell

Nothing here came as an ambush. God gave Pharaoh the details first, then did exactly what He had said.

The first plague God sent was announced beforehand to Pharaoh... Then he announced to Pharaoh that he would strike the waters of the river that they might become blood (v. 17)... The announcement evidently had no effect on Pharaoh, and the Lord commanded Moses to do just what he had warned (v. 19). When he did this, the result was just as he had said (v. 21).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Not a natural discolouring

Some explain the blood as the Nile's seasonal red tint. One writer weighs that against what the text reports.

Even rationalism does not in every case dare to deny that the events told in Ex. 7-12 were supernatural... Alongside the first plague (Ex. 7:15-25) they point to Ehrenberg, who in 1823 saw the inlet of the Red Sea, near Sinai, stained blood-red by tiny plants. Did this kill the fish in the sea or make the waters stink? Did it affect every pond and stream, indeed every vessel of wood and stone? They cannot deny that the two are worlds apart. The Nile takes on a reddish tint for some weeks in June, and none of these consequences follow. This blow fell in or about January, on the river of their pride and idolatry — the river that had seen the cruel death of Israel's male children.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The rod that struck the river

A later command points back to this very stroke, and one writer asks why.

Here we have a picture of Christ struck for us, by the hand of God, in judgment. The reader will note the expression, "the staff with which you struck the Nile." Why the Nile?... It was the staff that turned the water into blood that was to strike the Rock — and "the Rock was Christ" — so that streams of life and refreshment might flow for us.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Known, either way. God will make Himself known. He would rather do it in goodness, and turns to judgment only when people refuse to hear.

- Known by loss. He struck the Nile. What gave Egypt life became the sign of death — a penalty from the Life-giver Himself.

- Known above idols. The blow landed on the river Egypt worshipped, apparently as Pharaoh walked out to honour it.

- Known in advance. God announced every detail first, and it happened just as He said — and still Pharaoh would not listen.

- Known in mercy. The same staff that turned a river to blood later struck the Rock, so that streams of life could flow for us.

Exodus 7:18 · Darby

And the fish that is in the river shall die; and the river shall stink; and the Egyptians shall loathe to drink the water out of the river.

Moses meets Pharaoh at the Nile and tells him what is about to happen to the river. It is a warning given before the blow lands, and the blow falls on the one thing Egypt could not live without.

The Warning Comes First

God fixed the place, the words and the outcome before anything happened.

The first plague God sent was announced beforehand to Pharaoh. God told Moses that Pharaoh would go out in the morning to the river. He was to stand there with the rod that had earlier become a serpent, and repeat God's message demanding that Pharaoh let Israel go. The announcement had no effect on Pharaoh, and the Lord commanded Moses to do just what he had warned. When he did this, the result was just as he had said.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

But the warnings do not go on forever.

It seems to be part of God's ways to warn twice, and if no one takes notice, to strike the third time without giving any warning.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Real Miracle, Not a Seasonal Tint

Some have said the river only took on the red colour it shows at certain seasons. The dying fish and the stench answer that.

Was that a miracle, or was it red colouring matter that at times appeared in the river? It was a miracle. All the water of the river had become blood. Proof of that was abundant. The fish in the Nile died, the river stank, and the Egyptians could not drink of the water of the river. What a change in the Nile! In a moment the pleasant water became disgusting. One important source of food, within reach of even the ordinary person, was cut off, because the fish — clearly plentiful (Numbers 11:5) — died at once. Hapi, the Nile god, could not prevent it.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The blow also hit everyday food and drink.

This was a real punishment; because this was the water they all drank, and they valued it highly. The fish too was plentiful: the Israelites in the wilderness could not forget the fish of which they had eaten freely, or "for nothing."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Source of Life Becomes a Sign of Death

The whole country lived off this one river. That is exactly why it was struck.

The first plague turned the Nile and its branches into blood. The river was the very life of Egypt. The food, and the wealth, and the beauty of the land were all derived from it. Upon Hapi, or Nilus, the first judgment of God fell. All Egypt owes its existence to this generous river. Egypt did not admit that God made the fruitful Nile. It treated the river as the work of the Sun and of Creative Power, a stream produced, as it were, by nature out of nature. Now it was to be a River of Death in the middle of the land.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Blood means death. The question is whose hand put it there.

The support of life becomes the very symbol of death, and of death by violence, the infliction of the penalty. This is not just nature rising in revolt. It is a penalty from the Creator of nature — death from the Life-giver.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The Blow Struck Egypt's Religion

Egypt did not see the Nile as just water. Turning it red sent a message every Egyptian could read.

The Egyptians "regarded the Nile as divine in the strictest sense, and worshipped it under many names. As the bountiful Osiris, and under many other divine names, the Nile was the beneficent god of Egypt — the representative of all that was good. Evil had, however, also its god, the deadly enemy of Osiris — the hated Typhon — the source of all that was cruel, violent, and wicked. The Egyptians linked the touch or sight of blood with this hated being… So turning the Nile waters into blood defiled the sacred river. It made Typhon triumph over Osiris, and it dishonoured the religion of the land in one of its highest expressions."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The dying fish carried the point further. Egyptians worshipped certain fish too.

One blow brought down both Hapi and the sacred fish — the fertilizer, and the emblems of rich fertility, which they worshipped. Egyptian and Hebrew alike came to know the power of Jehovah all over Egypt.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Egypt's River and Ours

Egypt needed no rain. It drew its water from a river it could manage itself.

The river, as we see in Scripture itself, was the very symbol of independence. Egypt drank no rain water from heaven. Its supply did not come from above. This is the world in its independence of God. But this independence of God, the Giver of life, is only death, and turns to death. The judgment here as elsewhere reveals the actual spiritual condition. A thing that serves as God's creature and His minister is only a means of multiplied blessing. Cut off from Him, it produces nothing but a deeper and more complete separation.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned — God told Pharaoh the outcome before it happened, and Pharaoh still refused.

- Struck — this was no seasonal colouring of the water. Dead fish, a stinking river and undrinkable water proved a real miracle.

- Stench — Egypt's daily drink and food became the one thing it could not stomach. The support of life turned into the symbol of death.

- Shamed — one blow fell on Hapi, on Osiris and on the sacred fish, and all Egypt saw the power of the Lord.

- Searched — a river managed without heaven pictures a life managed without God. That independence ends in death from the Giver of life.

Exodus 7:19 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Say unto Aaron, Take thy staff, and stretch out thy hand upon the waters of the Egyptians -- upon their streams, upon their rivers, and upon their ponds, and upon all their reservoirs of water, that they may become blood; and there shall be blood throughout the land of Egypt, both in [vessels of] wood and in [vessels of] stone.

God's command here covers every drop of water in Egypt — rivers, canals, ponds, pools, even water already stored indoors. Why did God aim His first blow at the water? And what did that mean for a nation that treated the Nile as a god?

The reach of the blow

The verse names one water source after another. Egypt's drink, its food and its river god were all struck at once.

All the water of the river had become blood, and the proof was everywhere. The fish in the Nile died, the river stank, and the Egyptians could not drink the water. Water that had been pleasant to drink turned foul in a moment. One important source of food, within reach of the ordinary person, was cut off, for the fish were plentiful (Numbers 11:5) and died at once. Hapi, the Nile god, could not prevent it. The Creator gave the command, the waters were struck, and blood was the result. All the water in the ponds and pools, and in vessels of wood and of stone, became blood. Where Moses was not seen the plague was felt; and the Egyptians dug around the river for water.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The rod that struck

The staff in Aaron's hand already had a history in front of Pharaoh's court.

The demand for the release of the people was to be made again. If Pharaoh refused, the rod was to be stretched out over the river, and its waters turned to blood. That rod had been turned into a serpent, and it had swallowed the rods of the magicians. The river that was the very life of Egypt was turned into a river of death and stinking.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why the water

Egypt did not depend on rain. One writer sees in that a picture of the world living without God.

The river, as we see in Scripture itself, was the very symbol of independence. Egypt drank no water from the rain of heaven. Its supply did not come from above. This is the world living in independence of God. But this independence of God, the Giver of life, is only death, and turns to death. The judgment here as elsewhere reveals the actual spiritual condition. What God made to serve Him is only a means of rich blessing. Cut off from Him, it produces only a deeper and more complete separation.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A contest with Egypt's gods

The plagues were not random misery. Each one struck something Egypt trusted and honoured.

They were particularly suited, in the wisdom of God, to humble Egypt. It was not only an affliction on the land. It was not only deep pain and anguish to the people, growing worse each time. It was a solemn contest between the LORD and the gods of Egypt. The plagues were designed to strike them hardest in what made up their religion. Take the Nile: Egypt boasted in that river, which they thought of as the great emblem of God on earth… In these repeated blows we find God dealing with the gods as well as with the men and habits of Egypt.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not just discoloured water

Some explain the plague as the reddish tint the Nile takes on each year. One writer tests that against the details of this verse.

Alongside the first plague (Ex. 7:15-25) they set a blood-red stain that plant growth made in an inlet of the Red Sea in 1823. Did that kill the fish in the sea, or make the waters stink? Did it affect every pond and stream — indeed every vessel of wood and stone? The Nile takes a reddish tint for some weeks in June, and none of these things follow. They cannot deny the difference from so heavy a blow, in or about January, on the river of their pride and idolatry — the river that had seen the cruel death of Israel's male children.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same river, later

The prophets return to Egypt's waters, and the story does not end in ruin.

God stepped in for His people to punish Pharaoh and his people for their treatment of Israel. The river, the source of their prosperity, was not forgotten, for the rivers and waters of Egypt were turned into blood. In a coming day God steps in again to punish the Egyptians, before the day of blessing comes to them: "the waters of the sea will be dried up, and the river will be dry and parched" (Isa. 19:5). In the end, Egypt and Assyria will be blessed along with Israel (Isa. 19:23-25).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Source. The Nile was Egypt's life and Egypt's god. God struck the country where it felt strongest.

- Strike. The rod that had become a serpent, and had swallowed the magicians' rods, was now stretched over the water. The river of life became a river of death.

- Reach. No water escaped — rivers, canals, ponds, pools, even water already stored in jars of wood and stone. The plague was felt where Moses was never seen.

- Exposure. Independence from God, the Giver of life, only ends in death. The judgment made Egypt's real spiritual condition visible.

- End. God's blow fell on Egypt's gods as much as on its people. Yet Scripture points to a day when Egypt is blessed, not destroyed.

Exodus 7:20 · Darby

And Moses and Aaron did so, as Jehovah had commanded; and he lifted up the staff, and smote the waters that were in the river before the eyes of Pharaoh, and before the eyes of his bondmen; and all the waters that were in the river were turned into blood.

Egypt's whole life ran through one river, and it was the river God struck first. Moses lifted the rod in full view of Pharaoh and his servants, and the water turned to blood — a blow against Israel's oppressor and against the god Egypt trusted.

Life Turned Into Death

The Nile was not one resource among many. Egypt watered its fields from it and worshipped it — and that is where the first blow fell.

The river watered the land through its many channels. It was the very sign that Egypt did not need heaven. They worshipped it as a god, and yet could claim it as their own making (Ezekiel 29:3) — two things that always go well together in idolatry. God turned that river into blood, so that they could not drink of it. What supports life becomes the very symbol of death — death by violence, the penalty carried out. This is not just nature rising up against them. It is penalty from the Creator of nature — death from the Life-giver.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A Real Miracle, Not A Colour Change

Some say the water only looked red, as the Nile sometimes did on its own. The account answers that.

Was that a miracle, or was it red colouring matter that at times appeared in the river? It was a miracle. All the water of the river had become blood. The proof of that was abundant. The fish in the Nile died, the river stank, and the Egyptians could not drink the water of the river. The water was pleasant to drink, and in a moment it became disgusting. One important source of food, within reach of the poorest person, was cut off. The fish were clearly plentiful (Numbers 11:5), and they all died at once. Hapi, the Nile god, could not prevent it.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Aimed At Egypt's God

Moses struck the water in front of Pharaoh and his servants. Pharaoh had come down to the river that morning, and the timing matters.

Those who have studied the records of ancient Egypt tell us that the Egyptians worshipped the Nile as one of the chief gods of that land of idols. Remember that when the first plague struck the river, Pharaoh was going in the same direction that morning (Exodus 7:15). It gives us the impression that he was going out to worship the Nile-god, and at that very moment his god was struck.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Behind Pharaoh stood a greater enemy.

He dealt this way with Pharaoh because Pharaoh oppressed His people, and because Pharaoh pictured the god of this world. So His conflict was with Pharaoh and with everything Pharaoh trusted in. We therefore read that He executed judgment upon the gods of Egypt (Exodus 12:12; Numbers 33:4). It was the brilliant display of God's victorious power in the stronghold of Satan.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

What The Magicians Could And Could Not Do

The court magicians copied the sign. Look at what their copy proved.

In a small way the magicians did what Moses had done. By their enchantments — that is, by calling on their gods — they turned water into blood wherever they could find it. Their actions say, "By the power of our gods we can turn life into death. We can add to the misery that comes from the judgment of God." But their power stopped there. They could not turn death into life. They could not pass from death into life. God does this work, and God alone.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The Rod That Struck The River

God later sent Moses to bring water from a rock, and named the rod by what it had done here.

Here we have a picture of Christ struck for us, by the hand of God, in judgment. The reader will notice the expression, "the staff with which you struck the Nile." Why the Nile? Why mention this particular stroke of the rod? Exodus 7:20 gives the answer... The same rod that turned the water into blood would later strike the Rock — and that Rock was Christ — so that streams of life and refreshment might flow for us.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A Pattern Repeated At The End

One river's fate previews a wider judgment still ahead.

All this points to a terrible second acting out of these things. The second angel pours out his bowl of the wrath of God on the sea, and it becomes like the blood of a corpse. The third angel pours his bowl on the rivers and the springs of water, and they become blood. Death marked everything — not only the masses of nations and of men, but the springs and outflows of all human things in that day.

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

Summary

- River — Egypt's source of life became its symbol of death, struck by the same God who gave it.

- Real — the dead fish, the stench and the undrinkable water show a true miracle, not a seasonal discolouring.

- Rivals — the plague fell on the Nile-god as Pharaoh approached to worship, and the magicians could imitate death but never reverse it.

- Rock — the rod that turned water to blood later struck the rock, a picture of Christ struck in judgment so that life could flow out to us.

- Reckoning — commentators read the plague as a preview of a coming day when the springs of human life turn to blood again.

Exodus 7:21 · Darby

And the fish that was in the river died; and the river stank, and the Egyptians could not drink the water of the river; and the blood was throughout the land of Egypt.

Egypt's whole life ran along one river, and the first blow God struck fell there. Why did God aim His opening judgment at the very thing Egypt trusted most?

Word announced, word fulfilled

Nothing here took Pharaoh by surprise. God had told him every detail beforehand, and it came just as He said.

Then he announced to Pharaoh that he would strike the waters of the river so that they might become blood (v. 17). The fish would die, the river would stink, and the people would find it disgusting to try to drink from the river. The announcement apparently had no effect on Pharaoh, and the Lord commanded Moses to do just what he had warned (v. 19). When he did this, the result was just as he had said (v. 21).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

A real miracle, not a stained river

Some would rather explain the change by natural causes. The facts in this verse rule that out — dead fish, a stinking river, water no one could drink, and blood beyond the riverbank.

Was that a miracle, or was it red colouring matter that at times appeared in the river? It was a miracle. All the water of the river had become blood. Proof of that was abundant. The fish in the Nile died, the river stank, and the Egyptians could not drink of the water of the river. What a change in the Nile! The waters were pleasant to drink, and in a moment they became disgusting. One important source of support, within reach of the ordinary person, was cut off, for the fish — clearly plentiful (Numbers 11:5) — died at once. Further, all the water in the ponds and pools, and in containers of wood as well as of stone, became blood. Where Moses was not seen the plague was felt, and the Egyptians dug around the river for water.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The river of life made a river of death

Egypt's water supply was also Egypt's boast, and the same stream now carried the penalty.

The river ran in many channels and watered the land. It was the very sign that Egypt needed nothing from heaven. They worshipped it as a god, and yet they could claim it as their own making (Ezekiel 29:3) — two things that fit well together in all idolatry. That river was turned into blood, so that they could not drink of it. The support of life becomes the very symbol of death, and of death by violence, the infliction of the penalty. What we see here is not just nature rebelling. It is penalty from the Creator of nature — death from the Life-giver.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Judgment on Egypt's gods

The colour of the plague carried a message Egypt's own religion could read.

The Nile was Egypt's god: they gave it the name "Osiris," which represented all that was good. Another god, "Typhon," represented all that was evil, and was regarded as blood-red. All Egypt would recognise that to turn water to blood was to make evil triumph over good.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The moment of the blow may have been pointed too.

It is also likely that when the first plague fell, Pharaoh was walking toward the river to worship the god that the Nile was thought to represent.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Imitation without power

Pharaoh's advisers matched the sign, and his heart stayed hard. Copying a plague is not the same as ending one.

But again the magicians proved that they too could produce death and stink, so Pharaoh's heart stayed hard. It is no surprise that Satan could produce death, or something that stands for death. He is the author of sin, and death came in through sin. Pharaoh made light of this first plague, but the common people felt the weight of it, and it lasted seven days.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The lasting warning

What happened to one river shows what happens to anything a person prizes apart from God.

The river is turned to blood; the means of life and refreshment becomes a witness of judgment (Exodus 7:14 etc.)... [These plagues show] how all that the world values, if separated from God, will in the end turn into plagues.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Announced — God told Pharaoh the ruin in advance, detail for detail. It came just as He said. He warns before He strikes.

- Aimed — the blow fell on the Nile, the supply Egypt lived by and called divine. The support of life became the symbol of death.

- Exposed — in Egypt's own religion, blood-red water meant evil beating good. God struck their river-god as Pharaoh walked toward it to worship.

- Imitated — the magicians could add death but could not remove it. Pharaoh used their trick as an excuse to stay hard, and his people suffered seven days.

- Applied — whatever the world values, held apart from God, turns at last into a plague.

Exodus 7:22 · Darby

And the scribes of Egypt did so with their sorceries; and Pharaoh's heart was stubborn, neither did he hearken to them, as Jehovah had said.

Egypt's water had just turned to blood. The court magicians produced the same effect, and Pharaoh walked away as though nothing had happened. Two questions follow: how far can a copy of God's work go, and why does it leave a heart harder than before?

Imitation as the enemy's method

The magicians are not arguing against Moses. They are copying him, and one writer traces this back to the two men the New Testament names.

The New Testament names the chief of these magicians. We read, "Just as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so these men also oppose the truth." (2 Tim. 3:8.) That reference matters, because it shows that one of Satan's own working principles shaped what the magicians did. What was its special character? In one word, IMITATION... So when the rod of God struck the waters of Egypt and they became blood, the magicians "did the same by their secret arts." (Ex. 7:22.) ... Timothy also describes the men who resist the truth as "having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power." If Satan can succeed in open opposition to the truth, he will not hide himself. But if that door is shut, he will transform himself into an angel of light.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Where the copying stopped

The copying had a limit. One writer counts how far it went.

The magicians of Egypt could copy the servants of the true and living God in only three things: turning their rods into serpents, (Ex. 7:12) turning the water into blood, (Ex. 7:21) and bringing up the frogs. (Ex. 8:7) But the fourth sign called for life to appear, together with a display of nature brought low. There they were completely at a loss, and had to admit, "This is the finger of God." (Ex. 8:16-19)

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The break came exactly where life had to appear. One writer names the reason, and the comfort in it.

Life belongs to God; He alone is its source; and so here Satan's efforts fail... So we can rest in confidence, whatever success the evil one seems to have now; for "the God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet." (Rom. 16:20.)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A trick that helped nobody

The magicians added to Egypt's trouble; they could not lift it. And Pharaoh missed what the sign meant.

The magicians used their secret arts to do the same thing. God had sent the trouble; and Satan shows he can bring trouble too, but he cannot take it away. Pharaoh regards the whole matter as if it was only magic... The Nile was Egypt's god: they gave it the name "Osiris," which represented all that was good. Another god, "Typhon," represented all that was evil, and was regarded as blood-red. All Egypt would recognise that to turn water to blood was to make evil triumph over good.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Who hardened Pharaoh's heart

The verse says Pharaoh's heart stayed hard, just as the LORD had said. So did God harden him? Scripture gives the order of events.

It is true that God hardened Pharaoh's heart. But that came only after Pharaoh had shown extreme and shocking arrogance by saying, "Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice…?" (Ex. 5:2) — and only after he had hardened his own heart again and again. In fact the Spirit, using two different words in the original language, says seven times that Pharaoh hardened his heart (Ex. 7:13, 14, 22; 8:15, 19, 32; 9:7) before saying that God hardened the heart of Pharaoh (Ex. 9:12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Hardening from God is real. It never comes first.

God never forced a man to be an unbeliever. Unbelief never begins as the result of hardening sent from God in judgment. Is there no such thing as hardening, then? ... It is just as wrong to suppose that God hardens a person when He first sends a testimony as it is to deny that He hardens after that testimony has been refused. The fact is, both are true.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why a copy deadens the truth

The lasting danger is not open denial. It is a copy good enough to make God's work look ordinary.

Nothing deadens the power of truth so much as this: people who are not under its influence at all do the very same things as those who are. This is Satan's agency just now. He wants everyone counted as a Christian. He would like us to believe that we are surrounded by "a Christian world." But it is counterfeit Christianity. Far from bearing witness to the truth, it is designed by the enemy of the truth to resist truth's power to purify and lift up.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Imitation — The magicians never contradicted Moses; they copied him. Opposition that wears the appearance of godliness is the harder kind to spot.

- Limit — The copying ran to three signs and stopped. Where life itself had to appear, the imitators said, "This is the finger of God."

- Uselessness — A copy can add to the trouble but never lift it. Nothing in the magicians' act relieved a single Egyptian.

- Excuse — What the imitation gave Pharaoh was a reason to feel nothing. Seven times he is said to harden his own heart before God is ever said to harden it.

- End — The copy is allowed for a time, then it breaks. Life belongs to God, and "the God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet."

Exodus 7:23 · Darby

And Pharaoh turned and went into his house, and took not this to heart either.

The first plague has just fallen: the Nile, the lifeline of Egypt, has turned to blood. Yet the king walks away from the riverside and goes indoors, and this verse asks how a man can watch that and feel nothing.

A blow aimed at Egypt's god

The Nile was not ordinary water to Egypt. God's first blow fell on the river the whole nation lived by.

We now consider the first plague, the turning of the Nile and its branches into blood. The river was the very life of Egypt. The food, and the wealth, and the beauty of the land were all derived from it. Upon Hapi, or Nilus, the first judgment of God fell. All Egypt owed its existence to this generous river. Yet Egypt did not acknowledge it as made by God. They saw it as the result of the Sun and of Creative Power — a stream that nature had produced out of nature. Now this fruitful river was to become a River of Death in the middle of the land.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

That background is what makes the king's calm exit so strange. He walked away from a sight his whole nation would have read as a disaster of the highest order.

Pharaoh treats the whole thing as if it were only magic. With no apparent concern, he went back into his house (v. 23). Yet he should have realized how serious this was. The Nile was Egypt's god: they gave it the name "Osiris," which represented all that was good. Another god, "Typhon," stood for all that was evil, and they pictured him as blood-red. All Egypt would see that turning water into blood meant evil had beaten good.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The imitation that gave him an excuse

The verse before this one says the magicians copied the miracle. Their copy gave the king his excuse, but it had a limit.

In a small way the magicians did what Moses had done. They used their enchantments, that is, they called on their gods, and wherever they could find water they turned it into blood. Their actions say, "By the power of our gods we can turn life into death, we can add to the misery that comes from the judgment of God." But there their power stopped. They could not turn death into life. They could not pass from death into life. God does this work, and God alone. Still, they managed to influence the king. Pharaoh's heart was hardened, and he would not let Israel go.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Indoors while his people suffered

Going home cost the king nothing. It cost his people a week.

Pharaoh made light of this first plague. But the common people felt the weight of it, and it lasted seven days.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Those seven days were not empty. They gave him room to change his mind.

Would Pharaoh yield? He hardened his heart. He strengthened himself in his opposition, left the riverside, and went to his house. Seven days passed, and Pharaoh had not seen Moses. There had been time to think. Pharaoh gained nothing from it.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Where the hardening begins

So who hardened Pharaoh's heart — the king, or God? One writer sets the order plainly.

God then sent a testimony to Pharaoh, as He does to everyone in some form or another. But man, left to himself, always refuses the testimony of God. He knows it is God. He is aware that he is doing wrong in refusing it. Yet he still refuses, because he does not like God and dare not trust Him, since God's word interferes with everything he likes. So man gives himself up to unbelief. Then God may, at that time or later, in His own wisdom, seal up a person in a judicial hardness. That is a distinct, positive act on God's part… God hardens because man refuses His word.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Still responsible

Does this leave Pharaoh a puppet, doomed by a decree made before he was born?

If our minds are shaped by the word of God, we will find that man is always treated as a responsible being. God judges and condemns him for his own sins, not by some decree fixed in advance.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Sign. God struck the one thing Egypt trusted and worshipped, and turned the source of the nation's life into death.

- Excuse. The magicians' cheap imitation let him dismiss it as magic. They could add to the death, but never reverse it.

- Exit. He went home unconcerned while ordinary Egyptians carried the weight of the plague for seven days.

- Waste. That week was time given for second thoughts, and he gained nothing from it.

- Answer. God's hardening followed his refusal, not the other way round. He stayed a responsible man, judged for his own sin.

Exodus 7:24 · Darby

And all the Egyptians dug round about the river for water to drink; for they could not drink of the water of the river.

Egypt's river had just turned to blood. Every pond, pool and stored jar was hit as well. So a whole nation went out to dig beside the river for a drink.

The source of life turned into a sign of death

The plague struck the water people drank.

The river was turned into blood, so that they could not drink it. What supports life becomes the very symbol of death — death by violence, the carrying out of the penalty. This is not just nature in revolt; it is a penalty from the Creator of nature — death from the Life-giver.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Why there was nowhere left to draw water

People have asked whether the water only looked red, as the Nile sometimes does. The blow reached the river, the standing water and even what was already stored indoors.

Was it a miracle, or was it the red colouring that sometimes appeared in the river? It was a miracle. All the water of the river had become blood. The proof was everywhere. The fish in the Nile died, the river stank, and the Egyptians could not drink the water of the river. What a change in the Nile! Water that was pleasant to drink turned disgusting in a moment. One important source of food, within reach of the poorest person, was cut off, for the fish, which were clearly plentiful, died at once. Hapi, the Nile god, could not prevent it... Further, all the water in the ponds and pools, and in vessels of wood and stone, became blood. Where Moses was not seen, the plague was felt; and the Egyptians dug round the river for water.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Judgment on Egypt's gods

Egypt did not just use the Nile; Egypt worshipped it. Commentators give the river god different names: Hapi or Nilus in one account, Osiris in another.

The river was the very life of Egypt. The food, the wealth and the beauty of the land all came from it. God's first judgment fell on Hapi, or Nilus. All Egypt owes its existence to that generous river. Yet Egypt did not admit that God had made it. They saw the fruitful Nile as the work of the Sun and of Creative Power — a stream produced, as it were, by nature out of nature. Now it was to be a River of Death in the middle of the land.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Egypt's own religion gave the change a meaning.

The Nile was Egypt's god: they gave it the name "Osiris," which stood for all that was good. Another god, "Typhon," stood for all that was evil, and they pictured him as blood-red. All Egypt would see that turning water to blood made evil triumph over good.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Seven days of thirst

The digging shows who carried the cost of the king's indifference.

Though Pharaoh made light of this first plague, the common people felt the weight of it, and it lasted for seven days. This, we suppose, is what the last verse of the chapter shows.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Looking for water instead of looking to God

Nobody here asks why the river was struck. All the effort goes into finding a substitute. Commentators see the same instinct in a later king, Ahab, who met a drought by sending his servants to hunt for water and grass.

There is not so much as a word about God in Ahab's orders to his servants — not a syllable about the sin that had brought God's heavy displeasure and judgement on the land. No; the word is, "Go to all fountains and brooks." That was Ahab's thought, his poor, low thought. His heart did not turn in true humility to the Lord. He did not cry to Him in the hour of his need. So his word is, "perhaps we may find grass." God is shut out, and self fills the whole mind. As long as he could find grass, he did not care about finding God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Water was the point. The Nile gave Egypt its food, wealth and beauty. Striking the water struck every person, every day.

- Water became death. What sustained life turned into the symbol of death — not an accident of nature, but a penalty from the Creator of nature.

- Water exposed the gods. The river Egypt worshipped could not protect itself. In Egypt's own religion, water turned to blood meant evil had beaten good.

- Water was sought, not God. Digging round the river was effort without repentance — the same instinct as Ahab's hunt for grass. Shut God out, and all you want is relief.

- Water ran out for seven days. Pharaoh made light of the plague; the common people felt its full weight.

Exodus 7:25 · Darby

And seven days were fulfilled, after Jehovah had smitten the river.

The chapter ends not with Pharaoh's answer but with a clock: seven full days ran out between the blow on the Nile and God's next move. Two questions follow — why did the first blow fall on a river, and what did Pharaoh do with the time?

The River Egypt Worshipped

The Nile was not just Egypt's water supply. It carried a god's name, so the colour of its water was a message the whole country could read.

Yet he should have realised that this was a very significant matter. The Nile was Egypt's god: they gave it the name "Osiris," which represented all that was good. Another god, "Typhon," represented all that was evil, and they regarded him as blood-red. All Egypt would recognise that to turn water to blood was to make evil triumph over good.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Not a Trick of Nature

Some have tried to explain the blood as a seasonal reddening of the water. One writer answers them from the details the text records, and from the timing.

Alongside the first plague, they point to Ehrenberg, who in 1823 saw the inlet of the Red Sea, near Sinai, stained a blood-red colour by plants. Did this kill the fish in the sea or make the waters stink? Did it affect every pond and stream — indeed, every vessel of wood and stone? They cannot deny that there is every possible difference between the two. The Nile takes a reddish tint for some weeks in June, with none of these consequences. This was a far more severe blow, in or about January, on the river of their pride and idolatry — the river which had seen the cruel death of Israel's male children.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The first blow also fell on the very river that had seen Israel's baby boys killed.

A Week of Digging

The seven days had a cost. Egypt spent them digging for water beside a river they could no longer drink from.

So the Egyptians had the work of digging wells near the river to find water to drink. This continued for seven days (v. 25), and it seems the plague eased at the end of that time.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The length of the plague was not random. One writer finds meaning in the number itself.

For seven days the river ran blood instead of water, death instead of life, corruption instead of fertility. This is because seven is the period which God has appointed to mark out time on earth. And may we not add that for all time the stream of idolatry is a tide of death and corruption.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Seven Days of Silence

Moses does not appear again for a week. Pharaoh had that time to himself, with what he had already seen.

He hardened his heart. He strengthened himself in his opposition, left the riverside, and went to his house. Seven days passed, and Pharaoh had not seen Moses. He had time to think. He did not profit from it.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The Pattern of the Plagues

This first stroke sets the shape of the nine that follow. Each blow comes, each blow lifts, and the gap in between is itself part of God's dealing.

In general the plagues grow in severity until they reach their climax in the death of the firstborn. So they show how certain the judgment awaiting the sinner is. The ending of each stroke shows God's willingness to withdraw His hand from judgment, and shows judgment to be His strange work. Pharaoh hardens his heart not only by refusing to bow under the plagues. He also keeps to his course after God, in answer to his cry, lifts the plague. So neither the severity of God in sending the plague, nor His goodness in lifting it, has any effect on one whose heart is fully set to do evil.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer asks why God kept striking a man He already knew would not yield.

He knows all things, so He knew that all nine plagues would not subdue the stubborn heart of Pharaoh. But the angelic principalities and powers in heavenly places do not know all things, and neither do men on earth. So He tested Pharaoh and gave space for repentance, as plague followed plague with growing severity. Then no one could rightly question the final stroke when it came.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Struck — the blow landed on the Nile, the river Egypt worshipped as the source of all good. Turning it blood-red announced the defeat of their religion in their own language.

- Proved — dead fish, a stench, and blood in every wooden and stone vessel rule out a seasonal tint. This was a real blow from God's hand.

- Measured — seven days marks a complete span of time on earth. For all seven, Egypt's source of life ran as death, and the people dug for water beside it.

- Offered — the week of silence was space to think. Pharaoh had the time and gained nothing from it.

- Refused — the lifting of each stroke shows that judgment is God's strange work. Yet nothing moves a heart set on evil — neither His severity nor His goodness.

Exodus 8:1 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Go unto Pharaoh, and say unto him, Thus saith Jehovah Let my people go, that they may serve me.

The first plague has run its course, and God sends Moses back to Pharaoh with the same demand. Two phrases carry it: "My people" settles who owns Israel, and "serve Me" settles why they must go.

God's Claim Against Pharaoh's Claim

The demand opens by naming Israel as God's own. That single phrase puts two owners in direct conflict.

The word to him was, "Let My people go …" So the Lord at once claimed the people as His. For a century or two the Pharaohs of Egypt had regarded the people as theirs, and held them as slaves. From the very start the two claims clashed. The Lord claimed the people that Pharaoh regarded as his own. Which claimant would prevail? The issue could not be in doubt for one moment.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Israel had earned nothing. The claim rests on God's own name, and even their time in Egypt had an end He had fixed.

God always acts on the ground of what He is. "I AM" secures everything for "MY PEOPLE." He was not about to leave His people among the brick-kilns of Egypt, under the whip of Pharaoh's taskmasters. They were His people, and He would act toward them in a way worthy of Himself. He did use Egypt as a school, and Pharaoh as a schoolmaster. But when the needed work was done, He set both aside and brought His people out with a high hand and an outstretched arm.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Purpose: Service

Freedom here is not an end in itself. The demand names a goal, and God repeats that goal from Moses' call to Sinai.

When He sent Moses to deliver Israel from Egypt, God said to him, "You shall serve God on this mountain" (Ex. 3:12). Again and again during the dispute with Pharaoh the word was, "Let My people go, that they may serve Me." And when the people were at Sinai, the word was, "You shall serve the LORD your God" (Ex. 23:25). God gave the law so the people might know His will for them, and serve by obeying it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

That service could not happen where they were. God demanded departure, not just better treatment.

The Exodus is the separation of the people of God from the world. One feature of the scene struck me: Israel was to go out of Egypt to serve the Lord, or hold a feast to Him (Ex. 5:1; Ex. 3:18; Ex. 8:1, 20; Ex. 9:1, 13; Ex. 10:3, 9). They could not serve Him or offer sacrifice to Him in the land of their slavery and in front of that people. Their religious service was of such a kind that Egypt would not tolerate it. It cut right across everything the Egyptians believed. If they had seen it, they would have persecuted and destroyed them, so Israel had to go out.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

A Renewed Offer Before a Renewed Blow

The verse offers another chance, not another blow. God announces the coming plague in advance, so Pharaoh can still give in.

Again God gives Pharaoh the opportunity to respond to His demand to let Israel go (v. 1). But Moses was to add a warning. If Pharaoh refused, a plague of frogs would flood their land. The frogs would not stay outside. They would come into their homes, into their bedrooms and beds, into their food and kitchen utensils (vv. 2-3).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

God gave time as well as warning. Pharaoh had gone home from the river, and a full week passed before Moses came to him again.

He hardened his heart and strengthened himself in his opposition. He left the riverside and went to his house. Seven days passed, and Pharaoh had not seen Moses. God had given him time to think it over. Pharaoh had not profited by it.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Judgment Aimed at Egypt's Religion

The creature chosen was not random. Egypt held the frog sacred, so the blow fell on their gods.

As Egypt had its Nile god, so it had its frog-gods and frog-goddesses. The Egyptians held the frog itself as a sacred emblem of the creative power of the god Ptah, one of the greatest of Egypt's gods… At God's command, the river was to swarm with these emblems of creative power. At the word of the Lord, frogs came in huge numbers over the whole country, against the creature's normal instinct.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The humiliation was complete: what they honoured became what they could not bear.

How humbling this second judgment must have been to a people who counted frogs among their sacred animals — to see them, now an object of disgust, crowding their houses, their beds, their ovens and their kneading-troughs! These animals never trouble the Egyptians at the beginning of the year; still less do they come and go at the command of a man like Moses.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Refusal Costs

The plague also carried a message about Egypt itself, and Pharaoh's magicians only underlined it.

The magicians too could introduce such uncleanness, but could not reverse it. God had done this to discipline Egypt. He wanted to show them the real state of moral uncleanness that filled their nation. The magicians did it to show off their magic skills, but they only increased the trouble.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Claim. "My people" sets God's ownership against Pharaoh's, and that contest was never in doubt.

- Ground. The claim rests on who God is, not on what the slaves were. "I AM" secures everything for "My people," and Egypt was only a school God would close.

- Purpose. Release is never bare freedom; every repetition of the demand ends in the same word — serve.

- Separation. They had to leave, because the service God wanted was one Egypt would not tolerate.

- Cost. Refuse the demand, and judgment falls on the very things a nation worships. Its own experts can copy the trouble, but they can never remove it.

Exodus 8:2 · Darby

And if thou refuse to let [them] go, behold, I will smite all thy borders with frogs.

God speaks to Pharaoh a second time, and the demand carries a condition: refuse, and frogs will overrun the whole land. Why frogs? Why warn before striking? And what does a man do when the judgment lands?

The warning before the blow

The threat in verse 2 is not the plague. It is the offer of a way out, spoken before anything happens.

Again God gives Pharaoh the opportunity to respond to His demand to let Israel go (v. 1). But Moses was to bring with it a warning. If Pharaoh refused, their land would be flooded with a plague of frogs. The frogs would not stay outside. They would come into their homes, into their bedrooms and beds, into their food and kitchen utensils (vv. 2-3).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Before this second warning, Pharaoh had already had a week to think.

He hardened his heart, strengthening himself in his opposition, left the riverside, and went to his house. Seven days passed, and Pharaoh had not seen Moses. There had been time to think. Pharaoh had gained nothing from it.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Threats God means to keep

A warning is only as serious as the one who gives it. Commentators say God never bluffs, and that He still leaves a door open.

Men's threats are sometimes just idle words or empty boasting. The judgments God announces are not like that. In the whole history of the world, the Creator has never threatened a judgment He did not mean to carry out. At times the repentance of the people has held back His hand... It is also true that He is "slow to anger." He leaves an open door for repentance until the last. But even the patience of God has limits.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Creatures acting against their own nature

The threat named ovens and kneading bowls — the hot, dry places no frog would ever choose. That detail is what marks the plague as more than a bad season on the Nile.

These frogs were no ordinary ones. Or, if they were the ordinary creature, they were about to do what frogs never do. They were going into ovens, into hot and dry spots, and all kinds of places completely contrary to their nature.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Why frogs

The choice of creature was not random, and neither was its reach. In Egypt the frog was a religious symbol, so the plague turned the nation's own emblem against it — from the king down.

As Egypt had its Nile god, so it had its frog-gods and frog-goddesses. Egyptians held the frog itself as a sacred emblem of the creative power of the god Ptah... At God's command the river was to bring out these emblems of creative power in swarms. At the word of Jehovah a swarming multitude of frogs spread over the country, against the ordinary instinct of the creature. They afflicted everything — houses, bedrooms, beds, ovens or dough. They afflicted everyone, the king as much as the people. Nothing and nobody escaped their slimy presence and disgusting croaking.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

What the second plague pictures

Commentators read a moral meaning in the order of the plagues, and connect the frogs with the unclean spirits of Revelation.

The first plague taught the serious lesson of death. The second stands for uncleanness (Rev. 16:13-14). It pictures something far more revolting: the moral and spiritual pollution that infects every level of society when people refuse the Word of God... The magicians too could introduce such uncleanness, but could not reverse it. God did this to discipline Egypt. He wanted to show them the real state of moral uncleanness that ran through their nation.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Pressure that produces a plea, not a change

When the frogs came, Pharaoh turned to Moses for help. Note who he did not ask.

Frogs crawled over the proud king himself. He had no choice but to ask Moses to plead for their removal. He appealed neither to the magicians nor to those frog-shaped idols. He knew they could not help him. Only Jehovah could give help. The God of Moses was the only resource. But Pharaoh did not know Him.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Relief came. But with the frogs gone, Pharaoh "only hardened his heart in determination to keep Israel in captivity" (L. M. Grant).

Summary

- Refusal invites it. The plague is conditional. It lands only if Pharaoh says no. The frogs are his own choice, arriving in physical form.

- Refusal is given time. Seven silent days sat between the first plague and this warning. Pharaoh had real time to think, and he wasted it.

- Refusal is answered exactly. God sent Egypt's own sacred emblem, doing what frogs never do, so no one could call it bad luck.

- Refusal spreads filth. The second plague pictures uncleanness. It is the pollution that fills a society when God's Word is pushed away. Imitators can multiply it, but never remove it.

- Refusal survives relief. Pharaoh begged the God he claimed not to know. He got what he asked for, and hardened again. Pressure alone changes no heart.

Exodus 8:3 · Darby

And the river shall swarm with frogs, and they shall go up and come into thy house, and into thy bedroom, and upon thy bed, and into the house of thy bondmen, and upon thy people, and into thine ovens, and into thy kneading-troughs.

This verse belongs to the warning Moses brings Pharaoh before the second plague. It raises two questions: why frogs, and why into the oven and the bed?

Frogs in every room

The warning is not just that frogs will appear in the land. They will cross every threshold Pharaoh has. One writer follows the plague from the open fields into the most private corners of Egyptian life:

Moses was to add this warning: if Pharaoh refused, a plague of frogs would flood their land. The frogs would not stay outside. They would come into their homes, into their bedrooms and beds, into their food and kitchen utensils.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Creatures acting against their nature

The ovens and kneading bowls are the clearest sign that this was no natural swarm. Ovens are hot and dry — the last place a frog goes:

These frogs were no ordinary ones. Or, if they were the ordinary creature, they were about to do what frogs never do. They were going into ovens, into hot and dry spots, and all kinds of places entirely against their nature.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Some explain the plague as a natural event in the Nile valley. The timing defeats them:

The critics do not explain how the frogs came as soon as Aaron stretched out his hand over the waters of Egypt, and how they died by the millions after Moses prayed. Pharaoh was better than the modern critics, for he at least admitted that this was a miracle of Jehovah.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Egypt's own emblem turned tormentor

The frog was not a random creature. In Egypt it carried religious weight:

As Egypt had its Nile god, so it had its frog-gods and frog-goddesses. Egypt held the frog itself as a sacred emblem of the creative power of the god Ptah… At God's command, the river was to bring out these emblems of creative power in swarms. At the word of Jehovah a huge multitude of frogs swarmed over the country, against the normal instinct of the creature. They troubled everything: houses, bedrooms, beds, ovens and dough. They troubled all people too, whether the king or his subjects.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

For a nation that treated frogs as sacred, this was worse than an inconvenience:

How humbling this second judgment must have been to a people who counted frogs among their sacred animals! They had to watch a creature they found disgusting crowd their houses, and beds, and ovens, and kneading bowls.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the frogs stand for

Commentators read a moral meaning in the swarm, and they set it beside the plague that came before:

The first plague taught the serious lesson of death; now the second signifies uncleanness (Rev. 16:13-14). It is a picture of something far more disgusting: the moral and spiritual pollution that infects every level of society when people refuse the Word of God… The magicians could bring in such uncleanness too, but they could not remove it.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer ties this uncleanness to what happens when people turn away from God:

This plague is clearly connected with the last one. So we are following the same track as the apostle when he speaks of the result of turning away from God. "Since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done," or, as he puts it elsewhere, "to impurity" (Rom. 1:28, 24). Here are the unclean things that come out of the river, when people worship and serve the creature instead of the Creator.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Where the king turned for help

When the frogs came, Pharaoh had nowhere else to turn:

The proud king, with frogs crawling over his own body, had to ask Moses to pray that they would be taken away. He did not appeal to the magicians, nor to those frog-shaped idols. He knew they could not help him. Only in Jehovah was there any help.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Yet relief did not produce repentance:

They died and were gathered in heaps, so that only their stench remained, a reminder of the bad smell of Egypt's uncleanness. But as soon as he had relief from this scourge, Pharaoh only hardened his heart in his determination to keep Israel in captivity.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal — God announces the plague as the result of Pharaoh's refusal to let the people go. The warning comes before the swarm.

- Reach — Nothing stayed private: house, bedroom, bed, oven and kneading bowl, and the king's own body as much as his servants'.

- Reversal — The frog was a sacred emblem of Egypt's creative power. The creature they honoured became the thing they could not bear.

- Revelation — The swarm shows uncleanness pouring out of what people worship in place of God. The magicians could add to it, but never take it away.

- Refusal again — Pharaoh admitted that only Jehovah could take the frogs away. Then relief came, and he hardened his heart.

Exodus 8:4 · Darby

And the frogs shall come up both upon thee and upon thy people, and upon all thy bondmen.

The second judgment against Egypt ends on a personal note: the frogs will reach the king's own body, and everyone under him. Why would God use a creature this small and this disgusting against a king and his gods?

Nothing and nobody exempt

The threat is total. Egypt could not shut it out of a single room or a single life.

At the word of the Lord a vast multitude of frogs swarmed over the country, against the ordinary instinct of the creature. They afflicted all things — houses, bedrooms, beds, ovens or dough. They afflicted all persons too, whether the king or the people. Nothing and nobody was exempt from their slimy presence, their disgusting croaking and yelling.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The same levelling runs through the strokes that followed.

The whole land of Egypt was made to tremble beneath the successive strokes of the rod of God. All, from the monarch on his throne to the servant at the mill, were made to feel the terrible weight of that rod.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Frogs that behave unlike frogs

Frogs belong in water. The places named in the warning are the last places a frog would go.

These frogs were no ordinary ones. Or, if they were the ordinary creature, they were about to do what frogs never do. They were going into ovens, into hot and dry spots, and all kinds of places completely against their nature.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The timing was wrong as well.

How humbling this second judgment must have been to a people who counted frogs among their sacred animals! They saw them, an object of disgust, crowd their houses, and beds, and ovens, and the bowls where they made their dough. These animals never trouble the Egyptians at the beginning of the year. Still less do they come and go at the command of a man like Moses.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A worshipped creature becomes a punishment

The choice of animal was not random. The frog stood for one of Egypt's chief gods.

As Egypt had its Nile god, so it had its frog-gods and frog-goddesses. The frog itself was held as a sacred emblem of the creative power of the god Ptah. It appears sitting on a ring — an emblem of life — and it stands for the idea of great numbers. It was also an emblem of resurrection... The god Ptah was "the father of the gods." It was said of him that he "formed all beings, and all things came after him."

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

So the river Egypt worshipped poured out the creature Egypt worshipped.

All their gods became a source of shame and misery... The river brings forth frogs; their god tormented them.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The real dispute behind the plague

Pharaoh was holding God's people, and each blow fell on what Pharaoh trusted in.

He dealt with Pharaoh as the oppressor of His people. Pharaoh stood as a figure of the god of this world. So His conflict was with Pharaoh and with everything Pharaoh trusted in. We therefore read that He executed judgment upon the gods of Egypt. It was, then, the brilliant display of God's victorious power in the stronghold of Satan. If Satan rises in conflict with God, the outcome can only be his utter defeat.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Where Pharaoh turned for help

Copying a judgment is one thing. Ending it is another, and only one power could.

The gods of the Egyptians could not protect their worshippers from them. The magicians brought up frogs as well. But could they take them away?... The proud king had frogs crawling over his body. He had to ask Moses to plead with God to take them away. He appealed neither to the magicians nor to those frog-shaped idols. He knew they could not help him. In the Lord alone was help to be found.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Commentators also read a moral picture in the swarm.

The first plague taught the serious lesson of death. The second one stands for uncleanness. It pictures something far more revolting: the moral and spiritual pollution that infects every level of society when people refuse the word of God... The magicians too could introduce such uncleanness, but could not reverse it.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal — Pharaoh held God's people as their oppressor, and this second stroke fell on the king who would not release them.

- Reach — the plague spared no rank; it ran from the throne to the servant at the mill, and onto the king's own body.

- Reversal — the creature Egypt honoured as an emblem of the god Ptah, of life and of resurrection, became the instrument of their misery.

- Rivalry — the magicians could copy the plague, but they could not remove it; only the God of Moses could send the frogs and take them away.

- Result — Pharaoh had to look past his own gods and beg for help, because in the Lord alone was help to be found.

Exodus 8:5 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Say unto Aaron, Stretch out thy hand with thy staff over the streams, over the rivers, and over the ponds, and cause frogs to come up on the land of Egypt.

Pharaoh has already refused once, so God orders a second blow, and Aaron must stretch his hand over Egypt's waters — the Nile, its canals, its pools. Why strike the water, and why with a creature as small and ordinary as a frog?

The Command After a Refusal

It follows a warning Pharaoh brushed aside, and the frogs come up out of waters God had already struck.

At the end of that time the Lord, through Moses, repeated His demand for the release of His people. He announced a second plague if Pharaoh refused. Pharaoh did refuse, and the frogs appeared in their millions out of the waters that had been struck (Exodus 8:5-6).

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Every Waterway Named

The verse names the river, the canals and the pools. That list is the route the frogs took into ordinary homes.

The slimy creatures came out of every branch of the river, out of the irrigation canals and out of the reservoirs, as verse 5 shows. They got into houses, into their beds, their food vessels and their ovens. They defiled everything.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Blow Struck at Egypt's Gods

The plagues were not random discomfort. God struck at everything Pharaoh leaned on.

He dealt this way with Pharaoh as the oppressor of His people, and as a picture of the god of this world. So His conflict was with Pharaoh, and with everything Pharaoh trusted in. That is why we read that He executed judgment on the gods of Egypt.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The frog itself was one of those gods.

As Egypt had its Nile god, so it had its frog-gods and frog-goddesses. Egypt held the frog as a sacred emblem of the creative power of the god Ptah… Ptah was "the father of the gods." The Egyptians said of him that he "formed all beings, and all things came after him." At God's command the river was to swarm with these emblems of creative power.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Not a Natural Event

Not everyone accepts this as a miracle. The timing settles it, at both ends of the plague.

This plague was frogs, and they came out of the worshipped, sacred Nile. Critics have tried to explain it as a natural event. But they do not explain how the frogs came as soon as Aaron stretched his hand over the waters of Egypt. Nor do they explain how the frogs died by the millions after Moses prayed. Pharaoh was better than these modern critics, for he at least admitted it was a miracle of the Lord.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Even the natural facts about Egypt do not account for it.

Those who know Egypt and its history tell us that a "red Nile" used to happen every year, and that the river was a breeding place for frogs. But what happened here was quite out of the ordinary, both in its timing and in its intensity, and the invasion of the whole land by the frogs was a dreadful affliction.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Frogs Against Their Own Nature

The behaviour of the frogs was as strange as the timing.

These frogs were no ordinary frogs. Or, if they were the ordinary creature, they were about to do what frogs never do. They were going into ovens, into hot and dry places, and into all kinds of places against their nature.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Imitation Without Power

Egypt's magicians answered the miracle by producing frogs of their own. Their success only exposed the limit of what they could do.

Satan's power appears again, for we read, "The magicians did the same by their secret arts and made frogs come up on the land of Egypt." Then relief came, and the plague was lifted when Moses prayed for them… How striking that the only hope of removing the plague rested with Moses before the Lord. Those who wielded Satan's power were helpless before it, and under its power.

Modernised from F. G. PattersonOriginal wording

What the Frogs Picture

The frogs picture more than physical misery.

The first plague taught the serious lesson of death. Now the second stands for uncleanness (Rev. 16:13-14). It is a picture of something far worse: the moral and spiritual pollution that spreads through every level of society when people refuse the Word of God… The magicians could also bring in such uncleanness, but they could not take it away.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal — Pharaoh rejected the warning, so the frogs came up out of the waters God had already struck.

- Reach — The river, the canals and the pools are all named, so the frogs reached houses, beds and ovens.

- Target — The frog was an emblem of the god Ptah, so the judgment fell on what Egypt worshipped, not just on what it used.

- Proof — They came the moment Aaron stretched out his hand, and died when Moses prayed. They even filled dry ovens, against their own nature.

- Result — The magicians could copy the uncleanness, but they could not remove it. Only Moses before the Lord brought relief.

Exodus 8:6 · Darby

And Aaron stretched out his hand over the waters of Egypt; and the frogs came up, and covered the land of Egypt.

Aaron's hand goes out over the waters, and the second plague falls. Egypt's fields, houses and ovens fill with frogs. Commentators read it on three levels. It is a real event in a real land. It is a blow at what Egypt worshipped. And it shows how imitation, not open denial, fights God's power.

Frogs at command

Egypt already knew frogs, and it knew a red Nile. What it had never known was this scale, at this moment.

Pharaoh refused, and millions of frogs came up out of the waters that had been struck. People who know Egypt and its history tell us that a "red Nile" used to happen every year, and that the river was a breeding place for frogs. But what happened here was far out of the ordinary in both timing and intensity. The frogs invaded the whole land, and it was a dreadful affliction.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The timing is the argument. Some call the plague a natural event. Two moments still need explaining.

Critics who reject the supernatural have tried to explain this plague too as a natural event. But they do not explain how the frogs came as soon as Aaron stretched out his hand over the waters of Egypt. They do not explain how the frogs died by the millions after Moses' prayer. Pharaoh was better than today's critics. He at least admitted that it was a miracle of Jehovah.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Egypt's own emblem against it

The frogs came up out of Egypt's own waters, and both the river and the frog had a place in Egyptian religion.

As Egypt had its Nile god, so it had its frog-gods and frog-goddesses. The frog itself was held as a sacred emblem of the creative power of the god Ptah... The god Ptah was "the father of the gods." The Egyptians said of him that he "formed all beings, and all things came after him." At God's command, the river was to pour out these emblems of creative power in swarms. At the word of Jehovah huge numbers of frogs swarmed over the country, against the creature's normal instinct. They spoiled everything: houses, bedrooms, beds, ovens and dough. They troubled everyone, the king as much as the people. Nothing and nobody escaped their slimy presence and their disgusting croaking and yelling.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

What a nation honoured became what it could not escape.

How humbling this second judgment must have been to a people who counted frogs among their sacred animals! They saw them, an object of disgust, crowd their houses, and beds, and ovens, and kneading-troughs. These animals never trouble the Egyptians at the start of the year. And they certainly do not come and go at the command of a man like Moses.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the frogs stood for

Egypt's deeper problem was not the frogs. One writer reads the plague as a mirror of the nation's moral state.

The first plague taught the serious lesson of death. Now the second signifies uncleanness (Revelation 16:13-14). It is a picture of something far more revolting: the moral and spiritual pollution that infects every level of society when people refuse the Word of God... God had done this to discipline Egypt, and to show them the real moral uncleanness that filled their nation. The magicians did it to show off their magic skills, but they only made the plague worse. Cunning impostors do the same. They try to imitate spiritual power, and they only add their own uncleanness to the wickedness in the world.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Copying the miracle, resisting the truth

The magicians answered this sign as they had answered the others — by doing the same thing. One writer names the two magicians who opposed Moses, and sees a strategy in their copying.

"Jannes and Jambres" were able to do three things: the serpents, the blood, and the frogs. These were marked by satanic energy, death, and uncleanness. That is how they "opposed Moses." In the same way "these men also oppose the truth," and hinder its moral weight and its action on the conscience. Nothing deadens the power of truth so much as this: people who are not under its influence at all do the very same things as those who are.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The one hand that could lift it

Imitation reached its limit when Pharaoh wanted the frogs gone. Copying the sign was one thing. Lifting it was another.

Then relief came, and the plague was lifted when Moses interceded... How striking that the only hope of removing the plague rested with Moses before the Lord! Those who wielded Satan's power were helpless before it, and under its power.

Modernised from F. G. PattersonOriginal wording

Pharaoh's choice of whom to ask was itself a verdict on Egypt's gods and magicians.

Frogs crawled over the proud king himself, and he had to ask Moses to pray for their removal. He appealed neither to the magicians nor to those frog-shaped idols. He knew they could not help him. Only Jehovah could help him.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Command — The frogs came up the instant Aaron's hand went out. They died at Moses' prayer. The timing, not the creature, makes it a miracle.

- Covered — Egypt honoured the frog as an emblem of its creator-god. Then frogs filled its beds, ovens and kneading-troughs. The idol became a torment.

- Corruption — Blood spoke of death. The frogs speak of uncleanness, and expose the moral state of a land that refused God's word.

- Counterfeit — The magicians could copy the sign. Commentators call that copying Satan's weapon: imitation, not open denial.

- Cure — Counterfeits could multiply the plague but not lift it. Pharaoh, crawling with frogs, looked past his own gods to the God of Moses.

Exodus 8:7 · Darby

And the scribes did so with their sorceries, and brought up frogs on the land of Egypt.

Frogs had just covered Egypt, and Pharaoh watched his own magicians produce more of them. That raises a question far bigger than Egypt: how far can God's opponents copy His works?

Imitation as the method

The magicians did not argue with Moses. They matched him.

The New Testament names the chief of these Egyptian magicians: "Just as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so these men also oppose the truth" (2 Tim. 3:8). This reference matters, because what the magicians did embodies a principle of Satan's working. What was its special character? In one word, IMITATION… It was the same with the frogs (Ex. 8:7). Timothy shows the same men opposing the truth, as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, "having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power" (2 Tim. 3:5). This is one of Satan's most dangerous tricks. If he can succeed by opposing the truth in the open, he will not hide himself. If that door shuts, he disguises himself as an angel of light.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The effect on Pharaoh

The copy did its work on the king.

The magicians showed that they too could produce frogs out of the waters, and so they reduced the effect of the miracle in Pharaoh's mind. Those who know Egypt and its history tell us that the river was a breeding place of frogs. But what happened here was far out of the ordinary in both timing and intensity, and the invasion of the whole land by the frogs was a dreadful affliction.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A copy that only adds to the trouble

What the magicians produced made Egypt worse. Nobody asked them to undo it.

The first plague taught the serious lesson of death; the second signifies uncleanness. It is a picture of the far more revolting moral and spiritual pollution that infects all levels of society when the Word of God is refused. The magicians could also bring in such uncleanness, but they could not reverse it. God had done this as discipline toward Egypt, to expose to them the actual condition of moral uncleanness that filled their nation. The magicians did it to show off their magic skills, but they only increased the plague. Cunning impostors do the same: trying to imitate spiritual power, they only add their own uncleanness to the wickedness in the world. Pharaoh may have seen through this, for he did not ask the magicians to take the frogs away.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Relief could only come from the side the king was resisting.

Then the relief came; at the prayer of Moses the plague was removed, and "when Pharaoh saw that there was a respite, he hardened his heart" still more. How striking that the only hope of removing the plague lay with Moses before the Lord. Those who used Satan's power were helpless against it, and under its power themselves.

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

Where the counterfeit stopped

The frogs were the last thing the magicians could match.

The magicians of Egypt could imitate the servants of the true and living God in only three things: turning their rods into serpents (Ex. 7:12), turning the water into blood (Ex. 7:21), and bringing up the frogs (Ex. 8:7). But the fourth involved the display of life along with nature's humiliation. There they were defeated and had to admit, "This is the finger of God" (Ex. 8:16-19). It is the same with those who resist the truth in the last days. All they do is by the direct energy of Satan, and lies within the range of his power.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The boundary was life itself: they could produce striking results, but not that.

They could produce remarkable results, but they could not give life. When they tried to produce life, we read, "but they could not" (Ex. 8:18).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Frogs and the gods of Egypt

Egypt had a goddess assigned to this very problem.

Egyptologists tell us that a special goddess was supposed to be in charge of the frogs, to protect the land from them. Her name was Heki, and the monuments sometimes picture her with the head of a frog. The Egyptians had to learn that Heki was nothing before the LORD. It illustrates the word, "on all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgments" (Exodus 12:12).

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What Satan can and cannot do

A real power stood behind the magicians, but it had a fixed limit.

We may ask how far the devil can work miracles. I know of no limit, if God allows it (as in Egypt), in the use of natural laws or in producing appearances. But beyond nature or deception they cannot go. Ask them to create a louse, and Satan's instruments are stopped (Exodus 8:16-18). God alone can create. Satan uses power by inferior power, within the created scene. He cannot go beyond modifying it, and he cannot do it when he wills. Jannes and Jambres helped to harden Pharaoh's heart, but that only gave occasion for the display of God's own power and government or judgment.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Imitation. The enemy's move here is not denial but copying — the tactic of Jannes and Jambres: looking godly while denying the power.

- Increase. The copy never relieves; it adds. The magicians brought more frogs and could not reverse one of them.

- Limit. Three plagues were the ceiling. When life itself had to appear, the imitators failed and confessed the finger of God.

- Exposure. Egypt's frog goddess Heki was nothing before the LORD. The plague showed His judgment on all the gods of Egypt.

- Outcome. The hardening they helped cause only made room for God to display His own power — and relief still lay with Moses before the Lord.

Exodus 8:8 · Darby

And Pharaoh called Moses and Aaron, and said, Intreat Jehovah, that he may take away the frogs from me and from my people; and I will let the people go, that they may sacrifice to Jehovah.

Egypt's king had said he did not know the LORD. Now the frogs have reached his own bedroom, and he is begging Moses and Aaron to pray — with a promise attached.

A plague aimed at Egypt's gods

Why frogs? The answer lies in what Egypt worshipped.

As Egypt had its Nile god, so it had its frog-gods and frog-goddesses. Egypt held the frog itself as a sacred emblem of the creative power of the god Ptah... God commanded the river to "bring forth abundantly" these emblems of creative power. At the word of the LORD the swarming multitude of frogs spread over the country, against the creature's own normal instinct. They afflicted everything — houses, bedrooms, beds, ovens, dough — and everyone, whether the king or the people. Nothing and nobody escaped their slimy presence and their harsh croaking.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The king who said he did not know the LORD

Pharaoh began by denying that he knew God at all. Listen to how he speaks now.

Through this plague, Pharaoh's ignorance of the LORD disappeared. He no longer said, "I do not know the LORD." Instead he cried, "Plead with the LORD to take away the frogs from me and from my people" (Ex. 8:8).

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Why he did not call his magicians

Pharaoh had magicians of his own, and they had produced frogs too. Notice who he does not send for.

The magicians could also introduce such uncleanness, but they could not reverse it. God had done this to discipline Egypt. He wanted to show them the real moral uncleanness that ran through their nation. The magicians did it to show off their magic skills, but they only increased the plague. Cunning impostors do the same. Trying to imitate spiritual power, they only add their own uncleanness to the wickedness in the world. Pharaoh may have seen through this, for he did not appeal to the magicians to take the frogs away.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Asking for prayer he would not offer

Pharaoh wants someone else to approach God for him. One writer sets him beside a king of Israel who did the same.

"Pray for me," said Jeroboam in alarm. Sadly, the unhappy man had never learned to pray for himself. In this he reminds us of Pharaoh in Exodus 8:8, and Simon the sorcerer in Acts 8:24. The exercise of the power of God that he had experienced should have led Jeroboam to repentance, but the flesh learns nothing. He felt the consequences of his sin, but not the evil of it.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

God answers even a plea He knows is hollow

Moses did not turn down the plea of a man he had every reason to distrust.

Moses answered this plea and fixed the time for his prayer. Then Pharaoh would see the hand of the Lord in God's answer as surely as he had seen it in the judgment. It is beautiful to notice God's tender ways of grace, even with a hardened sinner. If there is even the slightest turning of the heart toward Him — though He knows it is not real — He is ready to hear. This is a striking testimony: He does not want the sinner to die. He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. (2 Peter 3:9.)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A promise made only to end the pain

Pharaoh offers to let the people go. But was that real surrender?

He had to recognise that the hand of the Lord was in this dreadful affliction. So he pretended to give in to God's demand, to get rid of the plague.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What happened when the relief came?

What a picture of the evil heart of man! Bowed down under the hand of God, alarmed at the consequences, he cries for relief and promises to keep God's commands if it is granted. The relief is given, and he at once forgets both his fears and his vows. In all such cases the conscience has never been truly awakened. There has been no sense of guilt before God, no acceptance of His word about man's lost and ruined condition, and so no turning to His saving grace in Christ Jesus the Saviour. The vows were made only as a kind of offering to appease God and get His hand lifted.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- The blow. God struck Egypt through a creature it held sacred. Its own emblem of divine power became its torment.

- The plea. The man who said he did not know the LORD now uses His name and begs for help. Pressure can teach the mouth what the heart has not learned.

- The mediator. His magicians could produce the plague but never remove it. So Pharaoh asked for prayer he would not offer himself.

- The mercy. God answered anyway. Even the faintest turning toward Him meets a readiness to hear, because He does not want the sinner to die.

- The relapse. The promise was a bargain, not repentance. He felt the consequences of his sin, not the evil of it — so when the relief came, the hardness came back with it.

Exodus 8:9 · Darby

And Moses said to Pharaoh, Glory over me, for what time shall I intreat for thee, and for thy bondmen, and for thy people, to cut off the frogs from thee and from thy houses; [so that] they shall remain in the river only?

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Exodus 8:10 · Darby

And he said, For to-morrow. And he said, Be it according to thy word; that thou mayest know that there is none like Jehovah our God.

Pharaoh has just begged Moses to pray the frogs away. Moses lets the king himself name the hour of the miracle, and Pharaoh picks the next day. Moses ties that chosen hour to one purpose: that Pharaoh would know there is no one like the LORD.

Moses hands Pharaoh the clock

In verse 9 Moses invites the king to name the time himself. Older versions render his words "Glory over me":

Moses made the removal more impressive by asking the king to fix when the frogs should go. The words "Glory over me" are rendered in the Septuagint "Fix for me." His answer was "Tomorrow." Moses replied that the LORD, the God of Israel, would prove His power. He would remove the plague at the exact time the king had set. It seems obvious that removing them in this way was an even more impressive miracle than bringing them up.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why not today?

Pharaoh could have said "now." One writer suggests why he chose the next day instead:

Pharaoh told him, "Tomorrow." (Perhaps he thought that God could not be expected to do it so quickly as "today"!) Moses told him at once that God would answer his prayer at that exact time. Then Pharaoh would have clear evidence that there is no other like the LORD God of Israel.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The one thing the magicians could not do

Egypt's magicians had matched the plague by producing frogs of their own. Producing frogs and removing them are not the same power:

The first plague taught the serious lesson of death; the second signifies uncleanness... The magicians could also introduce such uncleanness, but they could not reverse it. God had done this in discipline toward Egypt, to expose to them the actual condition of moral uncleanness that filled their nation. The magicians did it to show off their magic skills, but they only increased the scourge.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

So the removal, not the arrival, forced the admission. Egypt had never worshipped this God, yet the frogs obeyed Him:

A God until then unknown in Egypt really existed. True, He had no temple in that land, no priests devoted to His service, and no processions in His honour. But this at least was acknowledged: He alone could remove the disgusting and unwelcome frogs. Here was a power greater than the magicians knew. A Being very different from any and all of the Egyptian gods had worked — first in multiplying the frogs, then in removing them. They were clearly under His control. His command went out; they came up and covered the land. By His command they died. God was making Himself known to the Egyptians by acts of judgment — an awful way of revealing Himself.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Measured against Egypt's gods

Moses' claim is a comparison with Egypt's gods. Those gods were tied to the very things the plagues struck:

Those who have studied the records of ancient Egypt tell us that the Egyptians worshipped the Nile as standing for one of the chief gods of that land of idols... They also had a goddess who was thought to rule over frogs. This shows us how these judgments affected the gods of Egypt.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

God insists on being known

Pharaoh had begun this conflict by refusing to acknowledge the LORD. Verse 10 answers him, and one writer traces the pattern back through Egypt's history:

In some way or other He will and must make Himself known, for that is His glory; but He would rather be known in goodness than in judgment, if men will hear... To Egypt the Lord made Himself known in Joseph, the witness of His goodness. Through Joseph He filled Egypt's storehouses with all kinds of wealth. But Egypt forgot Joseph. Then a king arose who persecuted Joseph's people. He said of his God, "Who is the LORD, that I should obey Him?" So the Lord had to make His name known in that land by judgment... He was now to be made known, not in Joseph, but in plagues.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

One more night with the frogs

God kept giving Pharaoh time. One writer sets that delay against the way God offers salvation:

Twice in the previous chapter God announced a plague for tomorrow. That gave at least twenty-four hours' respite, in case Pharaoh might relent. In contrast to this, salvation, as we know, is always presented today.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Question. Pharaoh had asked, "Who is the LORD?" Every plague, this one included, is God's answer.

- Offer. Moses let the king fix the hour himself, so no one could call the deliverance a coincidence.

- Proof. Egypt's magicians could add frogs; they could not remove one. Undoing the plague, not producing it, showed there is no one like the LORD.

- Contrast. The frogs had a goddess of their own; the judgment landed on Egypt's gods as much as on Egypt.

- Warning. God gave Pharaoh a full day's respite. But salvation is never offered for tomorrow. It is offered today.

Exodus 8:11 · Darby

And the frogs shall depart from thee, and from thy houses, and from thy bondmen, and from thy people they shall remain in the river only.

Pharaoh had begged for the frogs to go, and he named the hour himself. So the question of this verse is simple: can the God who sends a plague also call it off to the minute — and what does a man do once the pressure lifts?

The Greater Miracle

Moses let Pharaoh name the hour himself. One writer checks the Septuagint, an early Greek translation, for the sense of that offer.

Moses made the removal even more impressive by asking the king to set the time when the frogs should go. The Septuagint renders the words "Glory over me" as "Fix for me." Pharaoh's answer was, "Tomorrow." Moses replied that the LORD, the God of Israel, would prove His power by removing the plague at the very time the king had named. It seems obvious that their removal in this fashion was an even more impressive miracle than their being brought up.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What Egypt's Magicians Could Not Do

Egypt's magicians had produced frogs of their own. Getting rid of them was another matter.

Had such a plague ever been known before? The LORD, the God of Israel, brought the frogs. The gods of the Egyptians could not guard their worshippers against them. The magicians brought up frogs as well. But could they take them away? Was it just an accidental affliction that could not be explained? Pharaoh knew then that the God of the Hebrews was more powerful than all the gods of Egypt. So he turned to Moses to plead with the LORD for him. Frogs crawled over the proud king himself, and he had to ask Moses to plead for their removal.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Known Through Judgment

Egypt had many gods, and none of them could do this. Both the plague and its end pointed to a Being they had never reckoned with.

A power greater than the magicians knew had worked. This was a Being completely unlike any of the Egyptian gods. He first multiplied the frogs, and then removed them. Such creatures were clearly under His control. His command went out; they came up and covered the land. By His command they died, so that they would torment the king and his people by their presence no more. God was making Himself known to the Egyptians by judgment, a terrible way to reveal Himself.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Why "Tomorrow"?

Pharaoh could have said "now." One writer wonders why he chose to wait.

Pharaoh told him, "Tomorrow." (Perhaps he thought God could not be expected to act as fast as "today"!) Moses told him at once that God would answer his prayer at the exact time. Then Pharaoh would have clear evidence that there is no other like the LORD God of Israel.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

God used the word "tomorrow" too. One writer contrasts the delay before a plague with the timing of salvation.

God twice announced a plague for tomorrow. That gave at least twenty-four hours' delay, in case Pharaoh would relent. In contrast to this, salvation, as we know, is always offered today.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Mercy to a Hollow Plea

Pharaoh's request came from discomfort, not from a changed heart. God answered it anyway.

Moses answered this appeal and set the time for the prayer. When God answered, Pharaoh would see the hand of the LORD as surely as he had seen it in the judgment. It is beautiful to notice God's tender ways of grace, even with a hardened sinner. If there is even the slightest turning of heart to Him, He is ready to hear, though He knows the turning is not real. This is a striking witness that He does not want the sinner's death. He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. (2 Peter 3:9.)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Relief Without Change

The frogs left the people and the houses, and only the river kept them. The relief was exact — and it changed nothing in the king.

But even so, the effect of the plague was not yet over. Except in the river, all the frogs died that day by a miracle. They were gathered in heaps, and the land stank with their bodies. Yet even this was a respite, and as soon as Pharaoh saw it he hardened his heart and continued to defy God. The judgment had not produced any vital change.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Command: The frogs came up at God's word and left at God's word — He alone rules what He sends.

- Proof: Egypt's magicians could add to the plague but could not lift it. Taking it away showed there is no other like the LORD.

- Timing: Pharaoh named the hour himself. The answer came to the minute, so he could not call it an accident.

- Mercy: God heard a plea He knew was not genuine, showing that He does not want the sinner's death.

- Relief: The relief came, but the heart stayed the same. That is why rescue is always offered today, never tomorrow.

Exodus 8:12 · Darby

And Moses and Aaron went out from Pharaoh; and Moses cried to Jehovah because of the frogs that he had brought against Pharaoh.

Between the plague and its removal stands a prayer. Pharaoh had begged for relief. Moses had let the king name the hour. Now the two men walk out of the palace, and Moses takes the plague to God. Egypt's judgment would be lifted because Egypt asked.

The one power that could undo it

The magicians had matched Moses by producing frogs of their own. But they could not reverse a thing. Only this prayer could remove the plague.

Then the relief came. Moses prayed, and the Lord took the plague away — and "when Pharaoh saw there was respite he hardened his heart" still more. How striking that the only hope of removing the plague lay with Moses praying before the Lord. The men who used Satan's power were helpless against it, and were under its power themselves.

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

Egypt was learning something about a God it did not worship.

But this much at least they admitted: He alone could remove the disgusting, unwelcome frogs. A power greater than the magicians knew, a Being utterly unlike any of the Egyptian gods, had acted — first in multiplying the frogs, then in removing them. Clearly the frogs were under His control. He gave the command; they came up and covered the land. At His command they died, and tormented the king and his people with their presence no more.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why the frogs mattered

Moses prayed "about the frogs." In Egypt, frogs were more than pests. Writers who have studied ancient Egypt point to a goddess connected with them.

Egyptologists tell us that a special goddess was thought to rule over the frogs and keep the land safe from them. Her name was Heki, and the monuments sometimes show her with the head of a frog. The Egyptians had to learn that Heki was as nothing before Jehovah. It illustrates the word, "Against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgment" (Exodus 12:12).

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Grace that answers a shallow cry

Pharaoh's plea was not repentance. He wanted the frogs gone. Yet Moses prayed for him, and God listened.

Moses answered his plea, and set the time for the prayer. Then, when God answered it, Pharaoh would recognise the hand of the Lord as surely as he had when the judgment fell. It is beautiful to notice God's tender ways of grace, even with a hardened sinner. If there is even the slightest turning of heart to Him, He is ready to listen, although He knows the turning is not real. That is a striking testimony: He does not want the sinner to die. He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. (2 Peter 3:9.)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The hour Pharaoh chose

Moses had asked the king to set the time himself. That detail turned the answer into proof.

Moses made the removal more impressive by asking Pharaoh to name the time when the frogs should go. The words "Glory over me" — the wording of an older translation — appear in the Greek Old Testament as "Fix for me." His answer was, "Tomorrow." Moses replied that Jehovah the God of Israel would prove His power by removing the plague just as the king had fixed it. It seems obvious that removing them this way was an even greater miracle than bringing them up.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Some have tried to explain the plague as a natural event.

Critics who deny miracles have tried to explain this plague too as a natural event. But they do not explain how the frogs came as soon as Aaron stretched his hand over the waters of Egypt, and how they died by the millions after Moses prayed. Pharaoh was better than today's critics, for he at least admitted that it was a miracle of Jehovah (verse 8).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Relief without repentance

The answered prayer did Pharaoh no lasting good.

Even then the effect of the plague was not over. Outside the river, all the frogs died that day by a miracle. They were gathered in heaps, and the land stank with their dead bodies. Yet even this was relief, and as soon as Pharaoh saw it he hardened his heart and went on defying God. The judgment had not produced any vital change.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Cry — Moses leaves the palace and takes the plague straight to God. Only that prayer could lift it.

- Contest — the frogs struck at what Egypt held sacred. Their exit, at God's word, showed the gods of Egypt to be nothing.

- Compassion — Pharaoh's turning was not real, and God knew it. Yet He was ready to hear, because He is not willing that any should perish.

- Clock — the king named the hour himself, so no one could call the answer chance. Taking the frogs away was the greater miracle.

- Cold heart — relief came, the land still stank, and Pharaoh hardened again. Answered prayer is not the same as a changed heart.

Exodus 8:13 · Darby

And Jehovah did according to the word of Moses; and the frogs died out of the houses, out of the courts, and out of the fields.

Frogs had swarmed out of the Nile and filled Egypt's houses, and Pharaoh had begged Moses to pray them away. Verse 13 records the answer — and it raises the sharpest question of the chapter: what does a man do when God answers his prayer?

An answer timed to the hour

Moses let Pharaoh name the time of relief himself, and Pharaoh chose the next day. The answer came exactly then, and that was the point.

Pharaoh called for Moses and Aaron. He asked them to plead with the Lord to take the frogs away, and he promised to let the Israelites go in return. Moses answered by asking Pharaoh to name the time when he should pray for the frogs to go (v. 9). Pharaoh told him, "Tomorrow." Moses told him at once that God would answer his prayer at that exact time. Then Pharaoh would have clear evidence that there is no other like the Lord God of Israel (v. 10).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer looks at Moses' question, which older translations give as "Glory over me":

Moses made the removal even more impressive by asking Pharaoh to set the time when the frogs should go. The Greek Old Testament translates the words "Glory over me" as "Fix for me." Pharaoh's answer was, "Tomorrow." Moses replied that the Lord, the God of Israel, would prove His power by removing the plague at the time the king had set. It seems clear that taking them away like this was an even greater miracle than bringing them up.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the magicians could not undo

Pharaoh's own magicians had produced frogs. He still had to go to Moses to get rid of them.

The magicians may have helped to increase the number of frogs a little, but they could not take them away. Pharaoh had to recognize that the hand of the Lord was in this dreadful suffering. So he pretended to give in to God's demand, in order to get the plague removed.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Their copying had a short reach. It ran out at the very next plague.

There were only three things in which the magicians of Egypt could imitate the servants of the true and living God: turning their rods into serpents (Ex. 7:12), turning the water into blood (Ex. 7:21), and bringing up the frogs (Ex. 8:7). But the fourth plague involved the producing of life, together with the humbling of nature. There they were completely baffled, and had to admit, "This is the finger of God." (Ex. 8:16-19)

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Grace to a hardened heart

Pharaoh's plea was only a pretence, and the Lord heard it anyway and acted according to the word of Moses:

It is beautiful to notice God's tender ways of grace, even with a hardened sinner. If there is even the slightest turning of heart to Him, He is ready to listen, though He knows the turning is not real. This is a striking witness that He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. (2 Peter 3:9.) So the Lord heard, and "did according to the word of Moses. The frogs died out in the houses, the courtyards, and the fields." (Ex. 8:13.)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Not a coincidence of the season

Some have explained the frogs as a natural event. Their sudden death is where that explanation breaks down — and the creature in question was tied to Egypt's own gods.

This plague was made up of frogs, which came out of the Nile, the river the Egyptians worshipped as sacred. Critics who deny the miraculous have tried to explain this plague too as a natural event. But they do not explain how the frogs came as soon as Aaron stretched out his hand over the waters of Egypt, and how they died by the millions after Moses prayed. Pharaoh did better than today's critics, for he at least admitted that it was a miracle of the Lord (verse 8). Frogs were also connected with Egyptian idolatry. One Egyptian goddess called Hekt is pictured with the head of a frog. Frogs stand for unclean things. See Revelation 16:13.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Relief without repentance

The answered prayer left heaps of dead frogs and a stinking land — and a king unchanged.

But even so, the effect of the plague was not yet over. Except in the river, all the frogs died that day by a miracle. They were gathered into heaps, and the land stank with their dead bodies. Yet even this was a relief, and as soon as Pharaoh saw it he hardened his heart and went on defying God. The judgment had produced no real change.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- The cry. Pharaoh asked for relief, not for God; the request was a pretence made to get the plague lifted.

- The grace. God answered a cry He knew was not real — evidence that He is not willing that any should perish.

- The hour. Pharaoh fixed the time himself, and the answer came exactly then — proof that there is no other like the Lord God of Israel.

- The power. The magicians could add frogs; they could not remove one. Only God undoes what God sends.

- The heart. The frogs died, the land stank, and Pharaoh hardened — the judgment produced no real change. Relief by itself changes no one.

Exodus 8:14 · Darby

And they gathered them in heaps; and the land stank.

Pharaoh named the day, and on that day the frogs died. Egypt piled them up and lived with the smell of a creature it had called sacred, while Pharaoh took the relief and hardened his heart.

A miraculous death

The frogs did not drift away or crawl back to the water. They died where they stood, and the dying itself was a miracle.

Even so, the effect of the plague was not yet over. Except in the river, all the frogs died that day in a miraculous way. As people gathered them in heaps, the land stank with their bodies.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Heaps that testify two ways

Pharaoh had named the day himself. The heaps that followed were more than garbage.

Tomorrow, said Pharaoh. On the next day the frogs died out of the houses, villages, and fields. What widespread misery they must have caused, for now the land stank because of their dead bodies. Heaps of them were collected — witnesses, when alive, of Jehovah's power, and also, now dead, of His mercy.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Egypt's own god rotting in the sun

The smell carried an insult. You can only feel it once you know what the frog meant in Egypt.

As Egypt had its Nile god, so it had its frog-gods and frog-goddesses. The Egyptians held the frog itself as a sacred emblem of the creative power of the god Ptah. It appears seated on a ring — an emblem of life — and stands for the idea of multitudes. It was also an emblem of resurrection.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Hapi was the Nile god of Egypt. What he gave now made the country unbearable.

The generous Hapi had given birth to multitudes indeed! The emblem of creative power had become Egypt's tormentor by its unbearable numbers. Corrupted by its own deity, "the land stank."

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

What imitation could never clear up

Commentators read this plague as a picture of something wider than frogs. The magicians had matched the miracle earlier in the chapter, but matching was all they could do.

The first plague taught the serious lesson of death; this second one stands for uncleanness. It is a picture of the far more revolting moral and spiritual pollution that infects every level of society when the Word of God is refused… The magicians too could introduce such uncleanness, but could not reverse it. God had done this in discipline toward Egypt, to expose to them the actual moral uncleanness that filled their nation. The magicians did it to show off their magic skills, but they only increased the scourge. In the same way, cunning impostors who try to imitate spiritual power only add their own uncleanness to the wickedness in the world.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Uncleanness, and where it comes from

Where does such uncleanness come from? One writer traces it back to people who pushed God out of their thinking.

What makes them so distressing is their numbers, their presence everywhere, and — as is implied — their swarming out of the mud and slime: their uncleanness… Here we follow the same track as the apostle. He speaks of the result of departure from God: "since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done," or, as he otherwise puts it, "to impurity" (Rom. 1:28, 24). Here are the unclean things that come out of the river, when people worship and serve the creature rather than the Creator.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Relief taken, repentance refused

Pharaoh's plea for prayer was not sincere, and God knew it. He answered it anyway.

It is beautiful to notice God's tender ways of grace, even with a hardened sinner. If there is the slightest turning of heart to Him, He is ready to hear, even though He knows it is not real. That is a striking testimony: He does not will the sinner's death. Indeed He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance (2 Peter 3:9)… But what was the result? "But when Pharaoh saw that there was a respite, he hardened his heart and would not listen to them, as the Lord had said." What a picture of the evil heart of man!

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — The frogs came out of the river Egypt revered. Uncleanness swarms where people worship the creature instead of the Creator.

- Judgment — Egypt's own sacred emblem became its tormentor. The land stank because of what it had honoured.

- Prayer — The frogs died on the day Pharaoh named. Alive they were witnesses of God's power; dead, of His mercy.

- Imitation — The magicians could produce frogs but never remove them. Copying spiritual power only adds to the mess it cannot clear.

- Result — God answered a plea He knew was false, because He wants no one to perish. Pharaoh took the relief, kept the stench, and hardened his heart.

Exodus 8:15 · Darby

And Pharaoh saw that there was respite; and he hardened his heart, and hearkened not to them, as Jehovah had said.

Pharaoh had begged Moses to pray the frogs away, promising to let Israel go, and God answered. What happened next says more about him than the plague did: when the pressure lifted, so did the promise.

Relief as the Real Test

The frogs died, and people piled them in heaps until the land stank. Even that mess was better than the plague, and the small relief was all Pharaoh needed to go back to his old course.

Yet even this was a respite, and the moment Pharaoh saw it he hardened his heart and went on defying God. The judgment had produced no vital change.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Heart Made Heavy

The word for "hardened" also means "made heavy". Pharaoh made his own heart heavy against God. One writer sets that beside a question from the book of Job.

The frogs died, and Pharaoh hardened, or made heavy, his heart. But "who has hardened himself against Him and has prospered?" (Job 9:4). So said Job, and Pharaoh was no exception to that ancient saying.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Grace Toward an Insincere Prayer

Pharaoh's plea was not sincere, and God answered it anyway.

It is beautiful to notice God's tender ways of grace, even with a hardened sinner. If there is the slightest turning of heart towards Him, He is ready to hear, even though He knows it is not real. This is a striking testimony that He does not want the sinner to die. Indeed, He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance (2 Peter 3:9)... But what was the result? "But when Pharaoh saw that there was a respite, he hardened his heart and would not listen to them, as the LORD had said." What a picture of the evil heart of man!

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Mercy as the Occasion of Hardening

Every removal of a plague was an act of mercy, and Pharaoh met each one the same way. Only later in the story does the wording change.

Is God's sovereignty not seen in this? Again and again, God acted in sovereign mercy to remove the plagues. But this mercy only became the occasion of Pharaoh hardening his heart (see Ex. 7:13, 22; 8:15, 19, 32; 9:7). Finally, Pharaoh having hardened his heart, we read that "The LORD hardened the heart of Pharaoh" (Ex. 9:12).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The order of those two hardenings matters, because it settles who is responsible for what.

God did not make Pharaoh wicked. God leads no man to sin; but when Pharaoh had proved himself wicked and stubborn, God judicially hardened his heart. This hardening, however, never takes place until man has proved himself to be wicked.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Patience Mistaken for Permission

The pause between plagues was not neutral. A stubborn heart treats delayed punishment as permission.

The judgment of God is against everyone who does evil. There is no remedy but turning to God, whose goodness keeps inviting men to repentance. Yet His patience so often leads men to despise the riches of that goodness. So when judgment against an evil work is not carried out quickly, the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil (Ecc. 8:11). With Pharaoh, what hardened his heart was simply God's patient mercy (Ex. 8:15; Ex. 9:34)... treasures of mercy are stored up for the future as treasures of wrath.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

"As the LORD Had Said"

The verse closes by pointing back to what God had already announced. Later plagues end on the same note.

But again and again we are reminded that this was no surprise to God. All this happened "as the LORD had spoken through Moses." He saw the end from the beginning.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Where This Lands Today

Fear can produce prayers and promises that vanish with the danger. One writer heard the same thing from a soldier:

A soldier, badly wounded in France... told me that soldiers will pray when faced with death. They promise God to give up swearing. But as soon as the danger is over, both the prayer and the promise are forgotten. This shows there is no reality in either.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Why do such vows collapse?

In all such cases the conscience has never been really awakened. There has been no sense of guilt before God, and no acceptance of His testimony to man's lost and ruined condition. So there has been no turning to His saving grace, as revealed in Christ Jesus the Saviour. The vows that were made were really a kind of payment offered to get God's hand removed.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Respite tests. The plague pressed Pharaoh; the relief exposed him. Judgment changed his words, not his will.

- Respite is mercy. God answered a plea He knew was hollow, because He is not willing that any should perish.

- Respite despised. Patience that should have led to repentance became the very thing that made his heart heavy.

- Respite ends. Pharaoh hardened himself first. Only after he proved himself stubborn did the LORD harden him in judgment.

- Respite is now. A promise made in danger and dropped in safety was never real. God's goodness is still inviting you to repentance, so use the pause while it lasts.

Exodus 8:16 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Say unto Aaron, Stretch out thy staff, and smite the dust of the earth, and it shall become gnats throughout the land of Egypt.

The third plague falls on Egypt with no warning. Aaron strikes the dust with his staff, and the ground itself becomes a torment for man and beast. Two questions follow. Why did God stop warning Pharaoh? And why did the magicians, who had copied Moses before, fail here?

A stroke with no warning

This plague arrives without any warning. One writer ties that silence to what Pharaoh did after the frogs died.

Would Pharaoh then yield and obey the command of the Divine Being? He would not. The frogs died, and Pharaoh hardened, or made heavy, his heart. But "who has hardened himself against Him and succeeded?" (Job 9:4). So said Job, and Pharaoh was no exception... God was not going to trifle with the monarch. He was in earnest. Pharaoh was to know that. So now, without any warning, a fresh plague was to come.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

What the creatures were

Translations differ here — older versions read "lice," the ESV "gnats." The Hebrew word is uncertain. For one writer, a single detail settles it: where the creatures ended up.

Lice — in Hebrew, ken, kinnam. The dust of the land became lice in man and in beast. Some have supposed that the word means gnats, because the Greek Septuagint has skniphes, which some translate "mosquito-gnats." But gnats may belong to the next plague. More probably the word means the louse or the tick. The account describes them as "in man and in beast."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Where the imitation stopped

Egypt's magicians had matched Moses before. At the dust they stopped, and the reason lies in what this miracle was.

This was done by Aaron on behalf of Moses and the trying plague came to pass. At this point the magicians of Egypt were baffled. Out of the dead dust the living lice had come. Only God can bring life out of death. They could only confess, "This is the finger of God," and retire from the contest. From this point we hear of no more attempts to belittle the acts of God by satanic power.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The boundary of Satan's power

This failure marks out something wider — how far evil power can go when God permits it, and where it hits a wall.

We may ask how far the devil can work miracles. If God allows it, as in Egypt, I know of no limit to his use of natural laws, or to his producing appearances... but beyond nature or deception they cannot go — create a louse, and Satan's instruments are at their limit (Exodus 8:16-18). God alone can create... Satan uses power by a lesser power, inside the created world. He cannot go beyond changing it, and he cannot even do that whenever he wants.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Egypt's own gods fail

Egypt worshipped the earth as a god, so striking the dust attacked that god. Writers differ over the magicians' reply: some render it "the finger of God," others "the finger of a god."

Until now the magicians had successfully withstood Moses by imitating him. So they called on their gods, lifted up their rods, and struck the dust. But Seb, the Earth, could not help them — Seb, who carried on him the emblem of life-giving in the bird that lays the egg. Confusion covered them, and everyone could see their folly. "This is the finger of a god," they said — that is, of some being greater than the gods they had turned to. They admitted a power above their own.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Why dust

Scripture links dust with death and with man's frailty. One writer reads God's choice of material as a verdict.

Dust is often connected in Scripture with death — "the dust of death" (Ps. 22:15). "Dust to dust" was the original verdict which stamped man with vanity... With this plague, we have a striking picture of what the world is — under Satan's rule, God cast off, corrupt through lust, death hanging over it! ... here (as the magicians say) is "the finger of God," and it writes on the dust itself, as Christ wrote on it for the Pharisees in later times, man's condemnation.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The hardened response

The plague settled on people themselves, and the magicians drew a conclusion from it. The king did not.

This was a personal contamination that would be almost unbearable... They had before brought up frogs, but the frogs were already there to bring up. Now dust itself had become lice, and they recognise that this was bringing life from a lifeless source. They could not do this, even in the case of the lowest form of life. But even after this, Pharaoh hardened his heart in blindness. So many do the same today, even when they face God's clear testimony to the gospel of His Son.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Dust struck. God is in earnest. He sends no warning this time, because Pharaoh hardened himself after the frogs died.

- Dust into life. The miracle is a communication of life from a lifeless source — the very thing no created power can copy.

- Dust exposes. The imitators reach their limit and admit "the finger of God". After this they never try again.

- Dust condemns. The material chosen carries its own message: "dust to dust" is man's verdict, and the plague writes it across a whole land.

- Dust ignored. Pharaoh sees what his own experts admit, and still refuses. Many meet clear testimony today and harden in the same way.

Exodus 8:17 · Darby

And they did so; and Aaron stretched out his hand with his staff, and smote the dust of the earth, and there arose gnats on man and on beast all the dust of the land became gnats throughout the land of Egypt.

Egypt's third plague strikes with no warning given to Pharaoh. Aaron hits the ground, the dust becomes swarming insects on man and beast, and for the first time the king's magicians cannot copy what they see.

Dust turned into living torment

The change happened in the material itself. Lifeless ground began to move.

He now struck the ground with that same rod. The dust of the ground all over the land teemed with lice. Lifeless matter was alive. A living, moving mass appeared where dust had been before. Lice were upon man and beast (8:17). No one except Moses and Aaron was exempt. The person of the king was as open to this affliction as that of the poorest of his subjects.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Gnats or lice?

The ESV calls them gnats. The older translations these writers use say lice. Commentators differ over which insect the word means.

Lice — ken, kinnam. The dust of the land became lice in man and in beast. Some have supposed the word means gnats, because the old Greek translation has skniphes, which some render 'mosquito-gnats.' But gnats may belong to the next plague. It is more likely that the louse or the tick is meant. Scripture describes it as being 'in man and in beast.'

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Where the magicians stopped

The magicians copied the first two plagues. They could not copy this one. The reason lies in which way the change ran: from dead dust to living creature.

Out of the dead dust the living lice had come. The magicians could not imitate it, and they had to admit as much. Only God can bring life out of death. They could only confess, "This is the finger of God," and withdraw from the contest. From this point we hear of no more attempts to belittle the acts of God by satanic power.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The boundary of Satan's power

One writer draws a wider rule from this failure. Satan can rearrange what already exists. He cannot create.

Beyond nature or trickery they cannot go. Ask them to create a louse, and Satan's instruments come to a halt (Exodus 8:16-18). Natural forces he can use, if allowed. God alone can create, or by His own will bring about what carries out His purpose. He disposes of nature as its Master and does what He pleases. Satan works by a lower power, inside the created world. He cannot go beyond changing what is there, and he cannot even do that whenever he wills.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Egypt's own gods put to the test

The magicians did not just fail at a trick. They called on the god they credited with the ground and its life, and got nothing.

Until now the magicians had held out against Moses by copying him. So they called on their gods, lifted up their rods, and struck the dust. But Seb, the Earth, could not help them — Seb, who carried the sign of life-giving in the bird that lays the egg. Confusion covered them, and everyone could see their folly. "This is the finger of a god," they said. They meant some being greater than the gods they had turned to. They admitted a power above their own.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Fertile soil, loathsome harvest

Each plague turned one of Egypt's own resources against it. The struck dust is the third in that line.

The river is turned to blood; the means of life and refreshment becomes a witness of judgment. Out of the river come unclean frogs; the source of refreshment spreads defilement. The very dust, the soil that grows rich crops, produces lice — the vile corruptions that thrive alongside the world's prosperity. The plague of flies is similar. It shows that everything the world values, once cut off from God, will in the end turn into plagues.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Proof admitted, heart unchanged

The dust settled on skin — a contamination no one could shake off. Even so, the admission that God's finger was at work changed nothing in the king.

The lice however did not remain on the ground, but in keeping with the character of dust, it settled on people and animals. This was a personal contamination that would be practically unbearable... They could not do this, even in the case of the lowest form of life. But in spite of this, Pharaoh blindly hardened his heart, as so many do today in spite of being faced with God's clear testimony to the gospel of His Son.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Dust — Aaron struck the ground itself, and lifeless matter became a crawling mass on man and beast across Egypt.

- Life — the change ran from death to life. That is where the copyists failed: only God brings life out of dead dust.

- Limit — Satan's power can copy and alter what already exists. It cannot create. One louse marks the border.

- Gods — Egypt's earth god, credited with giving life, gave nothing when called on. Its priests confessed a greater power.

- Hardness — the proof came, and the magicians said it out loud, yet Pharaoh refused. Admitting God's hand is not the same as yielding to it.

Exodus 8:18 · Darby

And the scribes did so with their sorceries, to bring forth gnats; but they could not. And the gnats were on man and on beast.

The magicians of Egypt had matched Moses and Aaron step for step. This time their secret arts produced nothing, and their failure shows where their power ran out and what only God can do. (Older translations call these creatures "lice"; the ESV says "gnats," and the quotes below use the older word.)

What the magicians could not do

The plague came out of the dust of the ground. That is where the copying broke down.

Out of the dead dust the living lice had come. The magicians could not copy it. Only God can bring life out of death. They could only confess, "This is the finger of God," and leave the contest. From this point we hear of no more attempts to belittle the acts of God by satanic power.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

This plague touched people and animals directly, and the magicians had nothing already there to copy.

The lice did not stay on the ground. Like dust, they settled on people and animals. This was a personal contamination that would be almost unbearable. They had before brought up frogs, but the frogs were already there to bring up. Now that dust turned into lice, they saw that this meant bringing life out of a lifeless source. They could not do this, even with the lowest form of life. Yet Pharaoh hardened his heart in blindness, as so many do today, though God gives them clear testimony to the gospel of His Son.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Imitation as a strategy

The magicians never argued with Moses. They copied him, and the New Testament names them and treats that copying as a pattern.

The main ones are named in the New Testament. We read, "Just as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so these men also oppose the truth." (2 Tim. 3:8.) That reference matters, because it shows the magicians were acting on one of Satan's own principles. What was its special character? In one word, IMITATION... If he can win by opposing the truth openly, he will not hide. But if that door is shut, he will transform himself into an angel of light.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The fixed limit

The words "they could not" mark a line their arts never cross. One writer puts that line between changing what already exists and creating.

They cannot go beyond nature or deception. Ask them to create a louse, and Satan's instruments come to a stop (Exodus 8:16-18). He can use natural forces, if God allows it. God alone can create, or by His own will produce what carries out His purpose. He controls nature as its Master and does what He pleases. Satan works by a lesser power, inside the created world. He cannot go past changing it, and he cannot even do that whenever he wants.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

God let them get as far as they did, and He fixed where they would stop.

God allowed them to keep pace with every step Moses took, until the simplest fact of all showed that their power had reached its end, and they could go no further. They could no more get life-giving power than Simon Magus could buy the power of the Holy Spirit.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What their confession meant

Commentators differ on how much the magicians admitted. One writer reads their confession as a move to protect themselves, not to give God glory.

The very soil of Egypt was now turned into a curse. God now held back the demonic powers of imitation, and the wicked magicians had to confess, not for God's glory, but for their own protection, "this is the finger of God."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another writer notes that they called on their own gods first, and that they owned a power greater than those gods.

Until now the magicians had stood against Moses with success by copying him. So they called on their gods, lifted up their rods, and struck the dust. But Seb, the earth god, could not help them — Seb, who carried on him the sign of life-giving, the bird that lays the egg. Confusion covered them, and their folly was plain to everyone. "This is the finger of a god," they said. That is, of some being greater than the gods they had turned to; they admitted a power above their own.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Where the copy ends

Their defeat was not the end of it. The plagues went on, and they were caught in them.

The folly of Jannes and Jambres was plain to everyone. They not only failed to copy what Moses and Aaron did next; they were caught in God's judgments themselves. This is a solemn point. In the same way, the folly of everyone who has only the outward form will be shown up. They will be unable to copy the full and proper effects of divine life and power, and they will come under the judgments that follow from rejecting the truth they have resisted.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Imitation. The magicians never denied Moses openly; they copied him. That copying is the method Scripture points back to when it names Jannes and Jambres.

- Limit. Satan can change what already exists, and only as far as God allows. He cannot create. Dust turned into living creatures drew the line there.

- Life. The frogs were already alive and waiting to be brought up; the lice came out of lifeless dust. Only God brings life out of death — and the smallest creature was enough to prove it.

- Confession. They said "the finger of God" — read by one writer as self-protection, by another as admitting a power above their own gods.

- Exposure. Their folly became plain to everyone, and they ended up under the very judgments they had tried to mimic. A form without the power always runs out of road.

Exodus 8:19 · Darby

Then the scribes said to Pharaoh, This is the finger of God! But Pharaoh's heart was stubborn, and he hearkened not to them, as Jehovah had said.

Three plagues in, Egypt's magicians have matched Moses and Aaron sign for sign, even bringing up frogs. Then the dust turns to lice, their arts fail, and Pharaoh's own advisers name the power in front of them.

Where imitation stopped

Their earlier trick with frogs used creatures that were already there. This plague asked for something else, and L. M. Grant marks the line:

The magicians tried to copy this with their spells, but they could not. They had to admit that "this is the finger of God" (v. 19). They had brought up frogs before, but the frogs were already there to bring up. Now, when the dust turned into lice, they saw that this brought life out of a lifeless source. They could not do that, even with the lowest form of life.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Not a coincidence of nature

Some explain this plague away as an ordinary Egyptian pest problem at a convenient moment. William Kelly answers that such a person believes less than Pharaoh's own magicians did:

The sceptic counts at least the first of these "a natural phenomenon of the country." For him the wonder is that Aaron started it, and that the Israelites were spared. So he believes less than the magicians, who said to Pharaoh, "This is the finger of God" — not just a mix of unusual circumstances with a natural event.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The end of the contest

After this admission the magicians stop rivalling Moses. Edward Dennett traces what happened to them next:

Three times these instruments of Satan "withstood" Moses. But the plague of lice raised the question of producing life from the dust of the earth. Here the magicians were powerless, and had to confess that it was "the finger of God." Life belongs to God; He alone is its source. So Satan's efforts are defeated here, and we read of no further attempt by his servants to block the force of the divine signs. In the next chapter we find that they "could not stand before Moses because of the boils." (Ex. 9:11) They themselves have fallen under the punishing hand of God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Imitation as a strategy

Scripture later names two of these men, Jannes and Jambres, as the pattern for opposition to the truth. Their method was not contradiction:

The magicians of Egypt, who opposed Moses, show the character and methods of these opposers. Jannes and Jambres tried to resist the testimony of God, not by denying the truth, but by copying it. They tried to show that their power was as great as the power of God, and that they could match the results God produced by His word through Moses. They openly admitted that their power came from another source.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

That method always runs out. Mackintosh presses the same warning on anyone who holds only the outward form:

The folly of Jannes and Jambres was clear to everyone. The folly of all who have only the outward form will be exposed in the same way. They will not only be quite unable to copy the full and proper effects of divine life and power. They will themselves come under the judgements that follow from rejecting the truth they have resisted.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same phrase in the Gospels

The same phrase returns in the Gospels. Accused of casting out demons by Satan's power, Jesus answered, "But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you" (Luke 11:20). Kelly presses what that proves:

When the Lord was here below and showed His power over Satan, it was the kingdom of God. It could be called that because the King — the power of God — was there. So here, by casting out demons by the power of God, He proved that the kingdom of God had come. What better proof could anyone ask for? Man was completely unable to do such a work... But in the Lord's case it was not occasional, exceptional, or partial. It was always the same, and it covered every case.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A confession Pharaoh ignored

The verse ends with a hardened heart. Kelly reads Pharaoh as the standing example of how that happens. Man refuses first; God's judicial act comes after:

He knows it is God. He is aware that he is doing wrong in refusing Him. Yet he still refuses, because he does not like God and dare not trust Him, since God's word interferes with everything he likes. So man gives himself up to unbelief. Then God may, at that time or later, and in His own wisdom, seal a person up in a judicial hardness. That is a distinct positive act on God's part... God hardens because man refuses His word.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Copy — Satan's instruments opposed Moses by imitation, not denial. They matched him sign for sign three times.

- Life — the copying stopped when dust became living creatures. Only God is the source of life, and its lowest form beat them.

- Confess — the enemy's own experts named the power: the finger of God, not a lucky natural event.

- Collapse — they never opposed Moses again. By the next plague they were under judgment themselves, and every imitation of divine power ends there.

- Choose — the same finger of God later cast out demons and brought the kingdom near. Pharaoh refused clear proof, and God may seal such a refusing heart in its own hardness.

Exodus 8:20 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Rise up early in the morning, and stand before Pharaoh -- behold, he will go out to the water -- and say to him, Thus saith Jehovah, Let my people go, that they may serve me.

God sends Moses back to Pharaoh a fourth time, and He fixes both the hour and the place: early morning, at the water's edge, with the same demand as before. Three questions follow — why the river, why the demand is always for service, and what the swarms were.

The Meeting at the River

Pharaoh was already on his way to the Nile that morning. Where he was going, and why, gives the meeting its point.

God tells Moses to put His demand to Pharaoh again: the people, whom He claimed as His own, must go free. Once more Moses is to meet the king as he goes out to the river early in the morning. Those who have studied the records of ancient Egypt tell us that the Egyptians worshipped the Nile as representing one of the chief gods of that land of idols. Remember, too, that when the river was struck under the first plague, Pharaoh was going the same way in the morning. It gives us the impression that he was going out to worship the Nile-god, and just at that moment his god was struck.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Pattern in the Plagues

This morning meeting is not a one-off. The plagues come in three series, and each series opens the same way.

The Lord opened each of the three series of plagues by commanding Moses to meet Pharaoh "in the morning," at the start of a day. Moses and Aaron opened the second plague of each series by visiting Pharaoh, while the third came without warning. An ordered plan governs each series.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Set Free to Serve

The demand is never just about release. It always adds a reason: the people go so they can serve God. That reason explains why worship inside Egypt was never an option.

The Exodus is the separation of the people of God from the world. One feature in the scene struck me: Israel was to go out of Egypt to serve the Lord, or hold a feast to Him. They could not serve Him or offer sacrifice to Him in the land of their slavery, in front of that people. Their religious service was of such a kind that Egypt would not tolerate it. It cut right across everything the Egyptians thought, so they would persecute and destroy them if they saw it. They must therefore go out.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

What the "Swarms" Were

Commentators differ on which creature the word means. Older English Bibles printed "of flies" in italics to show that the translators had supplied it.

At the river, God threatens Pharaoh with the fourth plague. We notice that the text calls it "swarms" seven times. Our translators added the words "of flies" in italics, since the word in the original is plainly an Egyptian one and not Hebrew, and no one knows its exact meaning. The Septuagint uses a Greek word meaning "dog-flies." Other authorities believe it really means "beetles." If so, that would again bring in the thought of the gods of Egypt, for the Egyptians treated the beetle as sacred.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Whatever the insect, the warning spelled out how total the invasion would be.

If the king would not obey the fresh summons, swarms of flies would appear. They would settle on Pharaoh, on his servants, on his people. His house and the houses of the Egyptians would be full of them, and swarms would cover the very ground. Wherever anyone set a foot down, it would crush some of the swarm.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The Controversy Behind the Plague

The plagues are not random blows. Each one belongs to a quarrel between God and the man who held His people.

Their general purpose is clear if we remember the character of the controversy which God had with Pharaoh. He dealt with Pharaoh as the oppressor of His people, and as a picture of the god of this world. So His conflict was with Pharaoh and with everything Pharaoh trusted in. We therefore read that He executed judgment on the gods of Egypt. It was the brilliant display of God's victorious power in the stronghold of Satan.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Read as a picture, this plague says something about the things the world prizes.

The plague of flies is like those before it, and shows how all that the world values, if cut off from God, will in the end turn into plagues.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Morning — God sets the hour and the place. Moses meets Pharaoh on the way to the river, so the king meets the true God at the very spot where he goes to meet his own.

- Message — The demand comes back unchanged. God claims Israel as His own people, not as Pharaoh's property.

- Motive — Release is never the whole point. They go out to serve the Lord and hold a feast to Him, a service Egypt would never allow on its soil.

- Menace — Refuse the summons, and the swarms come: on Pharaoh, on his servants, into the houses, over the ground, so thick that every footstep crushes them.

- Meaning — God's quarrel is with the oppressor and all he trusts in. He judges the gods of Egypt, and what the world prizes turns into a plague once God is left out.

Exodus 8:21 · Darby

For, if thou do not let my people go, behold, I will send dog-flies upon thee, and upon thy bondmen, and upon thy people, and into thy houses; and the houses of the Egyptians shall be full of dog-flies, and also the ground on which they are.

Three plagues have already struck Egypt, and Pharaoh still holds Israel. So God sends Moses with one more warning: refuse again, and swarms will fill Egypt's houses and cover the ground.

The Warning Before the Blow

God does not strike without notice. He names the threat, its reach, and the one people He will spare.

This time Moses is to warn Pharaoh again. He repeats God's earlier command to let His people go… The word "swarms" is rightly translated "a mixture," meaning a mixture of small insects. Here God announces that the Israelites would be completely free from the plague: only Egypt would suffer.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

What the Swarms Were

Commentators differ on the exact creature. They agree on the damage: the pests invade homes and ruin the land itself.

Older English versions add the words "of flies," and the "swarms" may mean swarms of insects of different sorts. They were to come into the houses and also to ruin the land… One insect is extremely destructive to property, and ruins the wood of a house in a short time. The common fly of Egypt is no doubt among them. These flies are very troublesome. They quickly spoil food and keep attacking the body.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A Blow Aimed at Egypt's Gods

Egypt's religion is part of the target. The creature Egypt honoured now torments it, and the God of Israel stands out as the author of the blow.

The fourth plague was even more destructive and significant. These were not the common house flies, but a stronger insect with a very painful bite. They fastened on people and tormented them. It was another blow against the idols of Egypt. The Egyptians revered the beetle as the symbol of creative power, and the Egyptian Sun-god had a beetle's head. This plague did not touch Israel; Jehovah showed that Israel is His people… Here Jehovah is plainly revealed as the author of the plague judgments. His supreme authority stands out.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Line Drawn at Goshen

The threat names Pharaoh, his officials and his people, and goes no further. The swarms stopped at the border of Goshen, where the Israelites lived.

Was there no limitation of this plague? There was. The limit was territorial: not one of these insects reached the land of Goshen. The Israelites stayed free from them, while the insects tormented the Egyptians. Jehovah plagued the Egyptians; Jehovah sheltered His people. Now it was clear what a blessing it must be to belong to that down-trodden and badly afflicted people. The Egyptians might despise and even hate them. The Lord specially favoured them.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

One writer points out that this dividing line runs on through the plagues that follow, and gives it a striking name.

The three plagues that follow emphasise the division set between the Egyptians and the Israelites — literally, redemption. I have kept that word for good reasons. God's separation of His people is a redemption, the work of His grace in them as well as for them.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Comfort Turned to Torment

Each plague so far has taken something Egypt relied on and turned it against them.

The river is turned to blood; the means of life and refreshment becomes a witness of judgment. Out of the river come unclean frogs; the source of refreshment spreads defilement. The very dust — the soil that yields rich crops — produces lice, the disgusting corruptions that thrive alongside the world's prosperity. The plague of flies is like them. It shows how everything the world values, if cut off from God, turns into a plague in the end.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Compromise That Followed

Pharaoh's answer to this plague was an offer. It looked generous and was a trap.

The fourth plague — the swarms of flies — seemed to make a deeper impression… It was a very subtle offer. It could easily have trapped Moses and Aaron if they had not known the character and mind of God. Satan does not mind at all if his servants are religious, as long as they stay under his control… If they remain part of the world, the world and its god will love their own.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Warning. God names the plague before He sends it: its targets, its reach, and the one people He spares.

- Mixture. "Swarms" means a mixture of small insects. Writers differ on the exact creature, but it invaded houses, spoiled food and ruined the land.

- Idols. The creature Egypt worshipped became the tool of Egypt's torment, and God stood out as the author of the judgment.

- Division. Goshen was untouched. The same hand that plagued Egypt sheltered Israel, and that dividing line is called redemption.

- Compromise. Under pressure Pharaoh made a subtle offer: be religious, but stay where you are.

Exodus 8:22 · Darby

And I will distinguish in that day the land of Goshen, in which my people dwell, that no dog-flies shall be there; that thou mayest know that I Jehovah am in the midst of the land.

Pharaoh had already seen water turn to blood, frogs, and gnats — but this fourth plague came with something new attached to it. This time God named the limit in advance. He would leave one strip of ground untouched, the region where Israel lived. And He gave the reason: Pharaoh must learn who the LORD is.

The exemption of Goshen

God says He will "set apart" the land of Goshen and leave it out of the plague. That boundary is itself the miracle, and He named it before the insects arrived.

Notice too that in this fourth plague Israel, in the land of Goshen, is completely free from its effects. The "swarms" appeared on the very next day, as the Lord had said, and this severing of Goshen made the miracle far more impressive. The land was "corrupted," or "destroyed" by these "swarms." That rather supports the idea that they were beetles, for travellers in Egypt have testified to the very destructive habits of the sort of beetles found there.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Two nations, two treatments

The swarms did not happen to miss one district by chance. The same hand that sent them held them back at a line, and the people Egypt despised were on the safe side.

Was there no limit to this plague? There was. The limit was territorial, for not one of these insects found its way to the land of Goshen. The Israelites stayed free of them, while the insects tormented the Egyptians. The LORD plagued the Egyptians; the LORD sheltered His people. Now it was clear what a blessing it must be to belong to that downtrodden and badly afflicted race. The Egyptians might despise and even hate them. The Lord gave them special favour. His power showed itself here, His directing hand kept the insects within the set limits, and His mercy would show itself in removing them from the Egyptians.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

"A division" — a word worth weighing

In the next verse God calls what He is doing a division between His people and Pharaoh's. The Hebrew word behind it carries more freight than the English suggests.

When the Lord God wanted to own His people openly in Egypt, before He brought them out of it, He said to Pharaoh, "I will put a redemption [translated 'a division'] between My people and your people" — and in His grace He did it (read Exodus 8:22-23, margin). It is important to grasp this first meaning. Since sin entered the world, there is no return to God except on the ground of redemption, and it is a return. Of course, separation is not the only or the chief meaning of the word. More often it means rescue, or deliverance, because of a price paid in satisfaction — the ransom.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A blow aimed at Egypt's gods

The insects were not a random choice. Egypt honoured the creature God now used to torment them. Sparing Israel also settled whose people they were.

Swarms of flies covered all Egypt. These were not the common house flies, but a stronger insect with a very painful bite... It was another blow against the idols of Egypt. Egypt revered the beetle as the symbol of creative power, and the Egyptian sun-god had a beetle's head. This plague did not touch Israel. The LORD showed that Israel is His people. None of these terrible judgments touched His people. And this was a sign.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

"The LORD in the midst of the earth"

The stated purpose of the sign is a title. God claims the earth as the place where He acts and rules, and here He takes that name.

In Israel they knew Him as the Lord of all the earth (Exodus 8:22; Joshua 3:11; 2 Kings 5:15), for He truly lived among His people and had His throne there.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A pattern God repeats

What happened at Goshen was not a one-off arrangement. Writers trace the same order of events across Scripture.

It is God's way to sever His people from the ungodly, and take them out of their midst, before His judgment falls. He acted like this before the flood, and again in Egypt. He did the same at Sodom, and with His people before the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the sign pictures

The dividing line runs in two directions at once.

The testimony to Pharaoh, in which a division is made between Israel and the Egyptians. As a picture, it testifies to the separation of the world from Him on whom it depends, and the separation of His people from the world.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Division — God marks Goshen off from the plague. He calls it a division between His people and Pharaoh's, and the word translated "division" is the word for redemption.

- Demonstration — the swarms came on the day named and stopped at a border. That made the miracle plain: the LORD plagued Egypt and sheltered Israel.

- Declaration — the purpose was a name. He is the Lord of all the earth, and He had His throne among His people.

- Defeat of idols — Egypt honoured the beetle. God used swarms of insects to torment the country, so the blow fell on its gods.

- Design repeated — God's regular way is to separate His own before judgment falls. The picture runs both ways: the world is cut off from God, and His people are set apart from the world.

Exodus 8:23 · Darby

And I will put a separation between my people and thy people; to-morrow shall this sign be.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Exodus 8:24 · Darby

And Jehovah did so; and there came dog-flies in a multitude into the house of Pharaoh, and [into] the houses of his bondmen; and throughout the land of Egypt, the land was corrupted by the dog-flies.

The fourth plague falls just as Moses had warned, and this time the harm reaches the land itself, while Goshen, where Israel lives, stays clear. So what were these swarms, why did God ruin a whole land, and what does the untouched region prove?

What the swarms were

The word behind "swarms" is uncertain, and translators have had to guess. One writer traces the trouble to where the word came from, and to the Septuagint, the old Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures:

Seven times the text calls it "swarms." The English translators added the words "of flies" in italics, because the word in the original is clearly Egyptian and not Hebrew, and no one knows exactly what it means. The Septuagint uses a Greek word meaning "dog-flies," and this is the word used in Darby's New Translation. Other authorities believe it really means "beetles." If so, that again brings in the gods of Egypt, for they honoured the beetle.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Commentators differ. Another traces the word to a Hebrew root and reaches a different result:

The word used about it (arob) seems plainly derived from arab, to mix, and would mean "mixture," as the margin of the King James Version has it. The word appears nowhere else except in the book of Psalms (Ps. 78:45; Ps. 105:31), referring to the same infliction... The Septuagint has "the dog-fly," and by this or "the gad-fly" many would translate it. But the authority of the Septuagint, though great, is far from infallible.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The land ruined

Whatever the creature was, the harm went past discomfort. Property, food and people all suffered at once:

They were to come into the houses and also to corrupt the land... One insect is extremely destructive to property, ruining the wood of a house in a short time. No doubt the common fly of Egypt is included: they are very troublesome, soon defiling food, and persistently attacking the body.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What a ruined land teaches

The ruin of the land carries a lesson about anything people value apart from God:

The dust itself, the soil that grows rich crops, produces lice. These are the disgusting corruptions that thrive alongside the world's prosperity (Ex. 8:16). The plague of flies is like it (Ex. 8:20). It shows how everything the world values, once cut off from God, turns at last into a plague.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Goshen untouched

The ruin stopped at a border. That limit showed both God's power and His care:

Was there no limitation of this plague? There was. It was territorial in limit, for not one of these insects found its way to the land of Goshen. The Israelites stayed free of them, while the flies tormented the Egyptians. Jehovah plagued the Egyptians; Jehovah sheltered His people. Now it was clear what a blessing it must be to belong to that oppressed and badly treated people... God had sent the swarms; of that there was no doubt. His power was on display. His directing hand kept the insects within the set limits, and His mercy would be seen in removing them from the Egyptians.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

A blow at Egypt's gods

Egypt honoured these creatures; now they tormented Egypt. And the word for God's separating of Israel has its own meaning:

Swarms of flies covered all Egypt. These were not the common house flies. They were a stronger insect with a very painful bite. There were different kinds of them. "He sent among them swarms of flies, which devoured them" (Psalm 78:45)... It was another blow against the idols of Egypt. The beetle was revered as the symbol of creative power and the Egyptian Sun-god had a beetle's head. This plague did not touch Israel. Jehovah showed that Israel is His people... The word "division" in verse 23 means "redemption."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Pharaoh's offer

Ruin moved Pharaoh further than the earlier plagues had — and his answer was a compromise:

The fourth plague — the swarms of flies — seemed to produce a deeper impression. "Pharaoh called Moses and Aaron and said, Go, sacrifice to your God within the land." This was a very clever offer. It could easily have trapped Moses and Aaron if they had not known the character and mind of God. Satan has no objection at all to his servants being religious if they will still continue under his control... If they will only stay part of the world, then the world and its god will love their own.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Word — translators added "of flies." Some read the word as dog-flies, some as beetles, some as "mixture." Commentators differ.

- Ruin — the swarms destroyed property, spoiled food and attacked the body. The plague struck the land itself, not only the people on it.

- Lesson — what the world values, held apart from God, turns at last into a plague against its owners.

- Line — not one insect crossed into Goshen. The hand that sent them fixed their limits and sheltered His people while Egypt suffered.

- Response — the worse the damage, the more tempting Pharaoh's offer: worship God, but stay in the land.

Exodus 8:25 · Darby

And Pharaoh called Moses and Aaron, and said, Go, sacrifice to your God in the land.

Swarms of insects have ruined Egypt. Under that pressure Pharaoh calls for Moses with an offer that sounds fair: worship your God, but do it here, inside Egypt. Can God's people serve Him without leaving the place that holds them?

A concession squeezed out by judgment

Pharaoh's offer is not a change of heart. It comes only after the plague, and it falls short of what God commanded.

The warning again meant nothing to Pharaoh, so the swarms of insects devastated the land. Then Pharaoh grew worried enough to call Moses and Aaron. He told them they could go and sacrifice to God, but inside Egypt (v. 25). Moses could not accept this. God's order was to go three days' journey before sacrificing. On top of that, the Egyptians regarded the sacrifice of sheep and oxen as something detestable, and they would turn violent if it was done in Egypt (v. 26).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

First of a series of offers

This verse begins a pattern. Each later offer gives away a little more ground while still keeping something back.

Pharaoh said, "Go, sacrifice to your God within the land" (Ex. 8:25), that is, set up worldly worship. Moses replies, "We will go three days' journey into the wilderness and sacrifice to the LORD our God as he tells us" (v. 27). Then Pharaoh said, "I will let you go... only you must not go very far away" (v. 28), that is, don't be very separate. The next question was, "Go, serve the LORD your God. But which ones are to go?"... Pharaoh replies, "No! Go, the men among you" (Ex. 10:11). This means the parents may be for the Lord, but the children must be kept in the world.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The real speaker behind the throne

Commentators see someone else speaking through Pharaoh. The aim of the offer is not to help Israel but to silence the witness to God's name.

It hardly needs saying that whether the magicians resisted or Pharaoh objected, Satan was really the one standing behind the scenes. His obvious aim in this proposal of Pharaoh was to hinder the testimony to the Lord's name. That testimony was bound up with the complete separation of His people from Egypt. If they had stayed in Egypt, there could clearly be no such testimony, even if they had sacrificed to Him. They would have shared common ground with the uncircumcised Egyptians. They would have put Jehovah on a level with the gods of Egypt.

after In this case an Egyptian could have said to an Israelite, "I see no difference between us; you have your worship and we have ours; it is all alike."

C. H. Mackintosh

Why the offer sounds so generous

The trap is that the offer sounds kind. A king making room for another religion looks generous, and it is easy to argue for saying yes.

These were subtle words. They were well designed to trap a heart that was not in communion with the mind of God. Someone could argue it, and make it sound both believable and strong: Isn't it remarkably generous of the king of Egypt to tolerate your own way of worship? Isn't it a great stretch of kindness to give your religion a place on the public platform?... Why this demand for separation? Why not take common ground with your neighbours?

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Something in us wants the offer to work. It lets us keep both things at once.

The heart may crave religiousness because conscience testifies that all is not right; but it craves the world as well. It would like to "sacrifice to God in the land." Satan reaches his goal when people accept a worldly religion and refuse to "come out and be separate."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A compromise that empties the cross

The offer fails on its own terms. If Israel could worship inside Egypt, they never needed to leave — and by the same logic, the cross was never needed.

Here again is "mixture" — a half obedience which is not obedience. Worship God where you are, he says. As a picture, that means: stay in the world; don't leave it. But that is impossible. In the world, faith's sacrifice is an abomination, and Christ's cross only an offence. The cross is the judgment of the world — of man in the flesh — and if we can worship there, no cross is needed.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Another writer names what such worship would actually be, and what it quietly leaves out.

Worship in Egypt is worship in the flesh, Cain's worship, which does not own our ruin, nor Christ as meeting it. Death and resurrection have no place there. There is no redemption, and therefore practically no Redeemer.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Moses' answer: three days' journey

Moses answers Pharaoh's "within the land" with a distance. That distance carries the whole meaning.

Here is true separation from Egypt — "three days' journey." Nothing less than this could satisfy faith. The Israel of God must be separated from the land of death and darkness, in the power of resurrection... There could be no tabernacle, no temple, no altar, in Egypt... The believer must know where the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ have forever set him. Only then can he be an intelligent worshipper, an acceptable servant, or an effective witness.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Pressure: Pharaoh bargains only after the plague has ruined his land. Fear moved him, not repentance.

- Proposal: "Within the land" is the first of several offers. Each one trims the distance or holds back the children.

- Purpose: The aim is to silence the witness to God's name by putting Him on a level with the gods of Egypt.

- Problem: Worship inside Egypt is half obedience, which is no obedience. If we can worship there, no cross is needed.

- Path: Moses answers with three days' journey. Worship stands on Christ's death and resurrection, or it is not worship.

Exodus 8:26 · Darby

And Moses said, It is not proper to do so; for we should sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians to Jehovah our God lo, if we sacrificed the abomination of the Egyptians before their eyes, would they not stone us?

Pharaoh offers Israel permission to worship — but only inside Egypt. Moses refuses. His answer shows what Egypt worshipped, and why God's people could not raise an altar there.

Pharaoh's First Offer

Pharaoh's offer looks generous. It is the first of four moves to keep Israel in his grip.

Pharaoh now makes the first of four subtle objections to the full deliverance and complete separation of God's people from the land of Egypt: "Go, sacrifice to your God within the land." Behind the scenes it was really Satan, and his aim in this proposal was to hinder the testimony to the Lord's name — a testimony bound up with the complete separation of His people from Egypt. There could clearly be no such testimony had they remained in Egypt, even though they were to sacrifice to Him. They would have taken common ground with the uncircumcised Egyptians, and put Jehovah on a level with the gods of Egypt. An Egyptian could have said to an Israelite: "I see no difference between us. You have your worship and we have ours. It is all alike."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What "Abomination" Means Here

The word is not vague disgust. It names idolatry. Older translations read the phrase as "the abomination of the Egyptians" — Egypt's own idol — and the writers below follow that reading.

Here, as elsewhere, the word "abomination" stands for idolatry. Chemosh was the abomination of the Moabites, and Milcom of the Ammonites. Egypt worshipped Apis — the sacred bull. Throughout Scripture the ox pictures the labourer. Above all, the ox fits as a picture of God's Labourer — the patient, tireless Worker for God's glory and man's blessing. But of this Worker and His work, the Egyptian world knows nothing.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Why They Would Be Stoned

Moses said this to Pharaoh's face. He knew how Egyptians felt about their sacred animals.

The suggestion and the compromise so moved Moses that he feared neither great Pharaoh nor his priests and princes. At once he called deified bulls, sacred heifers and other four-footed beasts an "abomination." What is more, it was cattle that Israel would sacrifice to God! Would Egyptian religious feeling put up with such an outrage, done in front of their own eyes by their slaves? Even at Pharaoh's bidding? Killing a cat or a sacred animal meant certain death for a foreigner. When a cat in a house died, all the men of the house showed their grief by acts of mourning.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

No Altar in Egypt

Beyond the danger there was a deeper problem. Abraham's example shows it.

It would have been morally unfitting to sacrifice to Jehovah the very object of Egyptian worship. But there is more. Egypt was not the place to build an altar to the true God. Abraham had no altar when he turned aside into Egypt. He gave up his worship and his place as a stranger when he went down there. If Abraham could not worship there, neither could his descendants.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Picture for Believers

The clash was not only about bulls. It pictures why the world still rejects Christian worship.

Moses rejected the offer at once. The sacrifices of Jehovah would have been a deadly offence to the people of Egypt and would have provoked murder. Here again we can see a deeper picture. At the root of all our worship stands the unique excellence of Christ, set against the condemnation of Adam's race as fallen sinners. A doctrine that involves that judgment is an abomination to the world.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Three Days' Journey

Moses does not just refuse. He names a distance, and it points to resurrection.

Here is true separation from Egypt — "three days' journey." Nothing less than this could satisfy faith. The Israel of God must be separated from the land of death and darkness, in the power of resurrection. The waters of the Red Sea must roll between God's redeemed and Egypt before they can rightly sacrifice to Jehovah. … The believer must know where the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ have forever set him, before he can be an intelligent worshipper, an acceptable servant, or an effectual witness.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Personal Cost

What was true for Israel holds for us.

No, we cannot worship, or be really for God, while we are in Egypt — that is, the world. "We must go three days' journey into the wilderness and sacrifice to the LORD our God as He tells us" (verse 27) is the answer of faith. … It is a principle of immense value for your soul and mine, that if I am going to have God and be for Him, I must do without the world.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Offer — Pharaoh allows worship, but only inside Egypt. That would have put Israel's God on a level with Egypt's gods.

- Abomination — the word means idolatry. Egypt worshipped the bull, the very animal Israel had to sacrifice.

- Stoning — the danger was real. In Egypt, killing a sacred animal meant death, and Moses called those animals an abomination to Pharaoh's face.

- Altar — Egypt was no place for an altar to the true God. Abraham built none there, and neither could his descendants.

- Journey — three days' journey is the measure of true separation. To be for God, we must do without the world.

Exodus 8:27 · Darby

We will go three days' journey into the wilderness, and sacrifice to Jehovah our God, as he shall command us.

Pharaoh has just made his first offer: sacrifice to your God, but do it here in Egypt. Moses answers with a distance and an authority: three days out, and worship as God directs.

The answer to a tempting offer

The offer to worship without leaving Egypt kept Israel exactly where Pharaoh wanted them.

This was a most subtle offer, and one that might easily have trapped Moses and Aaron if they had not known the character and mind of God. Satan has no objection at all to his servants being religious, so long as they stay under his control. They may claim to serve God as much and as loudly as they like, if they will only recognise his authority... So Satan keeps advising, "Serve me and God. Sacrifice to your God, but stay in the land." One word of Scripture unravels all such plausible reasoning: "No one can serve two masters... You cannot serve God and money."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Pharaoh then shifted his ground instead of giving it up.

God's judgments began to fall still heavier on Pharaoh. Then he says, "I will let you go to sacrifice to the LORD your God in the wilderness; only you must not go very far away." This is compromise number two. You can be a Christian, he says to an awakened soul, but do not be too earnest, or too decided.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why sacrifice in Egypt was impossible

Moses gives a reason before he gives a distance: what Israel would kill, Egypt adored. The word "abomination" carries a specific weight.

The word "abomination" stands here, as elsewhere, for idolatry. Chemosh was the abomination of the Moabites, and Milcom was of the Ammonites. The worship of Egypt was that of Apis — the sacred bull. Throughout Scripture the ox pictures the labourer. Above all, the ox suits God's Labourer — the patient, tireless Worker for God's glory and man's blessing. But of this Worker and His work, the Egyptian world knows nothing.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The measure of three days

Commentators read the number as more than travel time.

The shortest distance that must separate Israel from Egypt is three days — death and resurrection. "Three days' journey" carried them to the other side of the Red Sea. There God vindicates His righteousness; there Justice strikes and Mercy saves. It pictures the Cross, where in an infinitely greater sense God carried out judgment and accomplished salvation.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same distance decides whether a person can worship at all.

Here is true separation from Egypt — "three days' journey." Nothing less than this could satisfy faith... There could be no tabernacle, no temple, no altar, in Egypt. It had no site anywhere within its borders for anything of that kind... The believer must first know where the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ have set him forever. Only then can he worship with understanding, serve acceptably, or bear effective witness.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Worship on God's terms, not ours

Moses does not only fix the place. He adds that the sacrifice must follow God's own direction. Neither Pharaoh nor Israel sets the pattern.

We must worship God according to Himself (John 4). Taking anything as authority in religion except what comes from Him mutilates worship... Man is not to decide his own ways as a worshipper. Willingness in worship is right; wilfulness destroys it all. They brought their offerings of their own free will (Lev. 1:3; 7:16), but they had to do this as and where the LORD willed. So with us: we are to worship "in spirit" — that is entirely true — in the grace and liberty of the Holy Spirit given to us. But we are to worship "in truth" also, according to God's revelation of Himself and of His worship.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The same question asked today

The distance Moses insisted on still strikes onlookers as excessive.

And still the world asks, "Why do you need to go outside it? You are entitled to your opinions, but why be so extreme? Why three days' journey into the wilderness? Why separate from what you were brought up in, and from people as good as you?" Ah, they do not know what that three days' journey means — that the death and resurrection of Christ place you where you are no more of the world than He is! Egypt — luxurious, civilised, self-satisfied, idolatrous Egypt — and the wilderness! What a contrast! Yet only in the wilderness can you sacrifice to God.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Offer. Pharaoh's first offer let Israel be religious and stay under his control. He allows religion, as long as he keeps the authority.

- Obstacle. What Israel would sacrifice, Egypt worshipped; Egypt had no place anywhere in it for an altar to the true God.

- Distance. Three days is the shortest gap between Israel and Egypt. It is the space of death and resurrection, seen again at the Red Sea.

- Direction. Worship "as he tells us" hands the pattern back to God: willingness is right, wilfulness ruins it.

- Outcome. First know where the death and resurrection of Christ have placed you. Then you can worship, serve, and witness with understanding.

Exodus 8:28 · Darby

And Pharaoh said, I will let you go, that you may sacrifice to Jehovah your God in the wilderness; only, go not very far away intreat for me!

Pressed to get the blow lifted, Pharaoh allows the journey — but he sets a limit on it and asks for prayer in the same breath. The offer costs him nothing. Commentators see the trap in it: if God's people must leave, keep them near enough to pull them back.

The tactic behind the concession

Pharaoh had already offered to let them sacrifice inside Egypt. This is his next move.

Pharaoh's second objection was much like the first in character and tendency. "I will let you go to sacrifice to the LORD your God in the wilderness; only you must not go very far away." If he could not keep them in Egypt, he would at least try to keep them near it. Then he could work on them through its many influences. That way they might be brought back again, and the testimony crushed more effectively than if they had never left Egypt at all.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer sets the offer in its sequence and puts it in plain terms.

Pharaoh is a picture of Satan's energy as prince of the world, then as now. He contested every inch of the road, and offered a series of compromises when he was hard pressed. He said, "Go, sacrifice to your God within the land" — that is, set up worldly worship. Moses replied, "We must go three days' journey into the wilderness." Then Pharaoh said, "only you must not go very far away" — that is, don't be very separate.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The distance Moses insisted on

Moses had already named the distance, and he did not choose it at random.

Moses answers these two scheming proposals with calm dignity. That calm shows a fixed purpose far more clearly than all the stormy anger shown against him. "We must go three days' journey into the wilderness and sacrifice to the LORD our God." That is the shortest distance that must separate Israel from Egypt: three days — death and resurrection. The three days' journey carried them to the far side of the Red Sea. There God vindicates His righteousness; there Justice strikes and Mercy saves. It is a picture of the cross. There, in an infinitely larger sense, God carried out judgment and accomplished salvation. The cross ends Egypt for the disciple and begins the wilderness.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why a border position is worse than none

Pharaoh's limit produces people who have left and yet not left.

So if people do not "go very far away," they had better not go at all. The enemy knew this well, and that is why he raised his second objection. Keeping a border position suits his purpose wonderfully. Those who stand on that ground are neither one thing nor the other. In fact, whatever influence they have works entirely in the wrong direction.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same writer tests what giving up the world really means.

There is a very wide difference between giving up certain worldly things and giving up the world itself. We may give up the theatre, the ballroom, the racecourse, the billiard table, and still cling to the world just the same. We may cut off some of the branches and yet hold on tightly to the old trunk.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

"Plead for me"

Pharaoh's plea for prayer sounds like softening. Moses agreed to pray — and warned him.

Pharaoh does not openly reject Moses' demand; he stalls and pretends, to get the blow lifted. His cry is, "Plead for me." Moses agrees. But he adds a solemn warning that shows he saw through the king's thin cover of hypocrisy: "only let not Pharaoh cheat again by not letting the people go to sacrifice to the LORD." Then the trouble passed, and the record runs as usual: "But Pharaoh hardened his heart this time also, and did not let the people go."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Yet God answered the plea. The same writer looks at what that shows about Him.

He saw the end from the beginning, but He removed His hand when Moses interceded for the Egyptian king. God is never impatient, even in the face of open rebellion. He waits His own time, bearing with the wickedness and godlessness of men in long-suffering and grace.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The way out of the halfway place

If the trap is nearness to Egypt, the answer is not a stricter rule but a stronger attachment.

It is one of Satan's masterpieces to lead professing Christians to be satisfied with looking to the cross for salvation while they stay in the world. Or he leads them to hold a border position — "not going very far away." This is a terrible snare, and we warn the Christian reader against it most solemnly. What is the remedy? True heart-devotion to a rejected and glorified Christ, and fellowship with Him.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Distance demanded. Moses named three days' journey — the space of death and resurrection, reaching the far side of the Red Sea.

- Distance disputed. Pharaoh grants the journey but caps it: don't be very separate. Failing to keep them in, he tries to keep them near.

- Distance shortened. You can cut branches and keep the trunk; you can drop some worldly things and keep the world in the heart.

- Distance lost. Those on the border are neither one thing nor the other, and their influence works in the wrong direction.

- Distance kept. "Plead for me" without a changed heart ends in a hardened heart. Only devotion to a rejected and glorified Christ holds the ground.

Exodus 8:29 · Darby

And Moses said, Behold, I go out from thee, and will intreat Jehovah; and the dog-flies will depart from Pharaoh, from his bondmen, and from his people, to-morrow; only let not Pharaoh deal deceitfully any more in not letting the people go to sacrifice to Jehovah.

The swarms of flies have driven Pharaoh to bargain. He will let Israel go to sacrifice, but only on his terms, and he wants Moses to pray the plague away. Moses agrees to pray. In the same breath he warns the king not to break his word again. Why does a small limit on freedom matter so much? And why pray for a man you already know is lying?

The concession with a leash

Pharaoh had first told Israel to worship inside Egypt. Moses refused, so the king moved — but only a little.

Pharaoh clearly had to admit the force of this objection. He changed his offer at once: he would allow a very short journey into the wilderness, only not very far away. He wanted them well within reach of his arm, so that their separation from his land would be in name only, and temporary.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Another writer sees the same move as an effort to bargain with God Himself.

He gave way a little, so as to let the people sacrifice inside the land. Would that not satisfy the God he had offended? He tried to make terms with God. What folly! His offer was rejected at once.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why a border position is worse than none

Commentators see a deliberate strategy behind Pharaoh's limit.

If he could not keep them in Egypt, he would at least try to keep them near it, so that its many influences could still work on them. That way they might be drawn back again, and their testimony silenced more completely than if they had never left Egypt at all. People who seem to give up the world and then return to it do far more serious damage to the cause of Christ than if they had stayed in it all along. They are as good as saying that they tried heavenly things and found earthly things better and more satisfying.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

He presses the point to its practical conclusion.

So if people do not "go very far away," they had better not go at all. The enemy knew this well, and that is why he raised this second objection. Holding a border position suits his purpose perfectly. Those who stand there are neither one thing nor the other, and whatever influence they have works entirely in the wrong direction.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The warning Moses added

The warning in this verse is not a general caution. Moses saw what the king was doing.

Pharaoh does not openly reject what Moses demands. He delays and pretends, to get the blow removed. His cry is, "Plead for me." Moses agrees, but adds the solemn warning. It shows that he saw through the king's thin covering of hypocrisy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The prayer and its answer

Moses kept his own word. He prayed, and God answered in full.

With this offer the king asked Moses to pray for him. Moses agreed, but warned him against the deceitful course he had been following. The Lord acted according to the prayer of Moses, and another great miracle took place. The next day the swarms left so completely that not one insect remained in the land. But once the trouble was gone, Pharaoh ignored the warning. He hardened his heart again and refused to allow what he had just promised. How true all this is to human nature! Under trouble people seem to become quite devout. The trouble is removed, and they go straight back to their godless ways.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

God's readiness to hear

God answered a prayer made for a man who was lying. One writer sees in this how God deals with a hardened sinner.

It is beautiful to notice God's tender ways of grace, even with a hardened sinner. If there is even the slightest turning of heart towards Him, He is ready to hear, although He knows the turning is not real. This strikingly shows that He does not want the sinner's death. He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. (2 Peter 3:9.)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

God knew what Pharaoh would do next, and He still answered the prayer.

He saw the end from the beginning, yet He removed His hand when Moses prayed for the Egyptian king. God is never impatient, even faced with open rebellion. He waits for His own time, bearing with the wickedness and irreverence of men in long-suffering and grace. If He is so patient, we surely might learn to be patient too, confident that in His own time He will show the world that His government is righteous.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Bargain. Pharaoh's offer was freedom with a leash — a journey short enough to keep Israel inside the reach of his arm.

- Border. A separation in name only serves the enemy better than none. Those who do not go far had better not go.

- Warning. Moses saw through the king's thin cover of hypocrisy and named the sin before Pharaoh repeated it.

- Prayer. Moses prayed anyway, adding a warning, and God removed every insect from the land.

- Grace. God hears even a turning He knows is not real. He is not willing that any should perish. That leaves the deceiver, not the plague, as the real problem.

Exodus 8:30 · Darby

And Moses went out from Pharaoh, and intreated Jehovah.

Pharaoh has just agreed to let Israel go — but only if they stay close by. Moses warns him not to break his word again, then walks out and prays for the man who has been lying to him.

The request that prompted the prayer

Pharaoh never refuses Moses outright. He stalls, and then asks for prayer — and Moses answers the request with a warning attached.

Pharaoh does not openly reject the demand of Moses; he plays for time and pretends, in order to get the blow lifted. His cry is, "Plead for me." Moses agrees, but he adds a solemn warning. It shows that he saw through the king's flimsy covering of hypocrisy: "Only let not Pharaoh cheat again by not letting the people go to sacrifice to the LORD."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Behind the request lies a bid to bargain. Pharaoh had first offered to let Israel sacrifice inside Egypt, without leaving.

Pharaoh again had to come as a beggar, and bow before Moses to plead for him. He gave way a little, so as to let the people sacrifice in the land. Would that not satisfy the offended deity? He tried to make terms with God. What folly! His offer was rejected at once.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Prayer without illusions

Moses doubted Pharaoh would keep his word. He prayed anyway.

Moses was plainly doubtful about Pharaoh's sincerity, but told him all the same that he would pray for this release, which he did (vv. 29-30).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

What Moses would not pray away

Moses prayed for the flies to go. He did not pray for Pharaoh's terms. One writer shows what the words "not very far away" were meant to do.

Pharaoh's second objection had much the same character and aim as the first. "I will let you go to sacrifice to the LORD your God in the wilderness; only you must not go very far away." If he could not keep them in Egypt, he would at least try to keep them near it. Then he could work on them through its various influences. In this way they might be brought back again, and the testimony silenced more effectively than if they had never left Egypt at all.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same words come back as advice to anyone starting out with God.

How cunning Satan is. Don't be too thorough, he says to a young convert: "You must not go very far away." How many a young believer the devil has tripped up with a word like that. Do not go very far. Do not be an enthusiast. Listen. The further you go from the world the better.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The answer, and what Pharaoh did with it

God answered the prayer in full — and the relief exposed the heart it relieved.

With this concession the king asked Moses to pray for him. Moses agreed, and added a warning against the deceitful line he had been following. The LORD acted according to the prayer of Moses and another great miracle took place. On the next day the swarms left so thoroughly that not one insect remained in the land. But once the affliction lifted, Pharaoh ignored the warning. Again he hardened his heart and refused the concession he had just promised. How true all this is to human nature! Under affliction people appear to become quite religious. Then the affliction lifts, and they go straight back to their godless ways.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why God answered at all

God was not deceived about Pharaoh. One writer draws out why He still lifted His hand.

He saw the end from the beginning. Yet He removed His hand when Moses interceded for the Egyptian king. God is never impatient, even when men openly rebel. He waits for His own time, bearing with the wickedness and ungodliness of men in long-suffering and grace. If He is so patient, we should surely learn to be patient too — turning our eyes to Him, confident that in His own time He will vindicate His righteous government before the eyes of the world.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Pressure. Pharaoh's "plead for me" comes from a man under a blow, not from a changed heart. He stalls, pretends, and tries to make terms with God.

- Prayer. Moses doubts the promise and prays anyway. He gives the warning and the prayer together.

- Limit. Moses asks God to lift the flies. He does not accept the condition that Israel stay near Egypt, because staying near is how the enemy keeps his hold.

- Answer. God answers in full: the next day not one insect is left. He lifts His hand though He sees the end from the beginning.

- Test. Relief is the real test. Pharaoh hardens the moment the pressure lifts, and religion that lasts only as long as the trouble is the pattern of human nature.

Exodus 8:31 · Darby

And Jehovah did according to the word of Moses; and he removed the dog-flies from Pharaoh, from his bondmen, and from his people; there remained not one.

Pharaoh had begged Moses to pray, and this verse records the answer: the swarms go, and they go completely. The relief was total. The real question is what Pharaoh did with it once the pressure lifted.

Another great miracle

One writer looks at what happened the day after Moses prayed:

The Lord acted according to the prayer of Moses and another great miracle took place. On the next day the swarms departed so thoroughly that not one insect remained in the land.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Prayer with a warning attached

Moses did not pray because he trusted Pharaoh. He prayed and warned in the same breath. What happened next proved the warning right:

Pharaoh does not openly reject the demand of Moses; he stalls and pretends, to get the blow removed. His cry is, "Entreat for me." Moses agrees, but adds a solemn warning. It shows that he saw through the king's flimsy covering of hypocrisy: "Do not let Pharaoh deal deceitfully again by not letting the people go to sacrifice to the Lord." Then the trouble was gone, and the usual record follows: "And Pharaoh hardened his heart this time also, and would not let the people go."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Mercy in the stopping of the stroke

Why lift the flies at all from a king who meant to break his word? Because every stroke that stops says something about how God judges:

In general the plagues grow more severe, until they reach their peak in the death of the firstborn. So they point to the judgment that certainly awaits the sinner. But the stopping of each stroke shows that God is willing to withdraw His hand from judgment. It shows judgment to be His strange work. Pharaoh hardens his heart in two ways. He refuses to bow under the plagues. He also keeps to his course when God answers his cry and lifts the plague. So neither God's severity in sending the plague, nor His goodness in lifting it, has any effect on a man whose heart is fully set to do evil.

after_check: meaning kept

Samuel Ridout

God was not deceived by the promise He answered:

He saw the end from the beginning. Yet He removed His hand when Moses interceded for the Egyptian king. God is never impatient, even in the face of open rebellion. He waits for His own time, bearing with the wickedness and godlessness of men in long-suffering and grace.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Relief without repentance

The pattern is not unique to a king in Egypt. Pressure produces religion; comfort ends it.

But once the plague was lifted, Pharaoh ignored the warning. He hardened his heart again and refused the concession he had just promised. How true all this is to human nature! Under trouble people seem to become very religious. Once the trouble goes, they go straight back to their godless ways.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The contest still unsettled

The flies were gone, but the bigger question was not. One writer points beyond this verse to what still lay ahead:

The flies were removed. There was not one. Pharaoh was again unyielding. Who would really prevail? The outcome will show. God had struck the waters and dealt with the ground as well. He would deal further with the king, his people, and his land before Israel came out a free and ransomed people.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Asked — Pharaoh's only move under pressure was "Entreat for me"; he wanted the blow gone, not God's will done.

- Answered — God acted on Moses' prayer. The removal was another miracle: not one insect left.

- Mercy — God saw the end from the beginning, yet He withdrew His hand when Moses prayed. Judgment is His strange work.

- Wasted — neither the severe plague nor its kind removal moved a heart set on evil. Relief only hardened Pharaoh.

- Unfinished — who would prevail was still an open question. More dealings lay ahead before Israel came out free and ransomed.

Exodus 8:32 · Darby

And Pharaoh hardened his heart this time also, and would not let the people go.

Pharaoh had just watched the swarms vanish at Moses' prayer, and he had already promised to let Israel go. Verse 32 shows what he did with that answered prayer, and it raises the hardest question here: who hardened this heart — Pharaoh, or God?

Relief, then relapse

The turning point is not the plague but its removal. Once the pressure lifted, so did the promise.

The Lord acted according to the prayer of Moses and another great miracle took place. On the next day the swarms left so completely that not one insect remained in the land. But once this plague was lifted, and despite the warning, Pharaoh hardened his heart again. He refused to allow what he had just promised. How true all this is to human nature! When trouble comes, people seem to become very religious. Then the trouble lifts, and they go back to their godless ways.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Deceit Moses had already named

Moses had asked Pharaoh not to act deceitfully again. Verse 32 shows the warning was needed, and it became the usual record of this king.

Pharaoh does not openly reject the demand of Moses; he delays and pretends, to get the blow removed. His cry is, "Plead for me." Moses agrees. But he adds a solemn warning, showing that he saw through the king's thin cover of hypocrisy: "Only let not Pharaoh cheat again by not letting the people go to sacrifice to the LORD." But once the trouble was gone, the usual record follows: "But Pharaoh hardened his heart this time also, and did not let the people go."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A compromise, not freedom

Even the promise he broke was a reduced one. Israel could go, but not far. One writer sees the same tactic aimed at new believers today.

This firm reply of Moses leads to Pharaoh's second compromise: "I will let you go, that you may sacrifice to the LORD your God in the wilderness; only you must not go very far away." How cunning Satan is. Don't be too wholehearted, he says to a young convert: "You shall not go very far away." The devil has tripped up many a young believer with words like these. Do not go very far. Do not be an enthusiast. Listen. The further you go from the world the better.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

His own hand on his own heart

Scripture is careful about who does the hardening. In 8:32 Pharaoh does it to himself.

It is true that God hardened Pharaoh's heart. But He did so only after Pharaoh had shown extreme and incredible arrogance by saying, "Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice…?" He did so only after Pharaoh had hardened his own heart again and again. In fact the Spirit uses two different words in the original language. No fewer than seven times, Scripture says that Pharaoh hardened his heart (Ex. 7:13, 14, 22; 8:15, 19, 32; 9:7). Only after that does it say God hardened the heart of Pharaoh (Ex. 9:12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

God's own hardening is real. But it comes later, as a judgment on unbelief, never as its cause.

God never compelled a man to be an unbeliever. In short, unbelief never begins as the result of God's judicial hardening. Is there no such thing then as hardening? Undoubtedly there is. It is an error to suppose that God hardens a person when He first sends a testimony. It is just as much an error to deny that He hardens a person after that person has refused His testimony.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No surprise to God

Pharaoh's broken word did not catch God off guard.

But again and again we are reminded that this was no surprise to God. He saw the end from the beginning; but He removed His hand when Moses interceded for the Egyptian king. God is never impatient, even in the presence of open rebellion.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Mercy abused

Each time God lifted a plague, He was showing mercy. Pharaoh turned that mercy into his chance to harden.

Is God's sovereignty not seen here? Again and again God acted in sovereign mercy and removed the plagues. But this mercy only became the occasion of Pharaoh hardening his heart (see Ex. 7:13, 22; 8:15, 19, 32; 9:7).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

That patience has a limit, and Exodus shows where it runs out.

God was very patient with Pharaoh and with Egypt when they persecuted His people. He gave them plenty of time and opportunity to repent and to obey His voice. But Pharaoh kept hardening his heart. So the Lord in judgment hardened it, and there was no longer room for repentance.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Relief. The heart hardened after the swarms were gone, not while they were there. Pressure produced promises; relief cancelled them.

- Deceit. Moses had named the pattern before it repeated. So this verse is not a shock failure; it is hypocrisy exposed.

- Half-measures. Even the promise Pharaoh broke was a compromise. "Not very far away" is still the tactic aimed at anyone leaving the world behind.

- Order. Seven times Pharaoh hardens his own heart, and 8:32 is one of them. Only later does Scripture say God hardened him. God never makes the first move into unbelief.

- Limit. Mercy given again and again, and abused again and again, ends in hardening as God's judgment. Then there is no room left for repentance.

Exodus 9:1 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Go in unto Pharaoh, and tell him, Thus saith Jehovah the God of the Hebrews Let my people go, that they may serve me.

Pharaoh has already gone back on one promise. The demand now returns unchanged, and with it two things worth weighing: the name God takes before this king, and the reason He gives for wanting Israel out of Egypt.

The God who takes the slaves' side

God names Himself here by His tie to a nation of foreign slaves:

Moses, commissioned again, presented himself before Pharaoh. "Thus says the LORD, the God of the Hebrews, Let my people go, that they may serve me" (9:1). The God of the Hebrews was persistent. He would take no denial. The slaves of Pharaoh, of Israel's race, had One who took up their cause. True, no invasion from beyond Egyptian territory threatened the security of the land. But a power did threaten its peace again. Pharaoh had felt that power before, and all the might of his armed forces could not deal with it, or even touch it.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why they must leave the land

The aim is not freedom on its own but service:

The Exodus is the separation of the people of God from the world. One feature of the scene struck me: Israel was to go out of Egypt to serve, or hold a feast to, the Lord (Ex. 5:1; Ex. 3:18; Ex. 8:1, 20; Ex. 9:1, 13; Ex. 10:3, 9); for they could not serve Him or offer sacrifice to Him in the land of their bondage and in front of that people. Their religious service was of such a character that Egypt would not tolerate it.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Another writer applies the same order to us — deliverance first, service second:

So it was with Israel, and so it is with us. We too must be a fully and consciously delivered people before we can properly serve, worship, or walk with God. We must know the forgiveness of our sins, and our complete freedom from guilt, wrath, judgement, and condemnation. But we must also know our complete deliverance from this present evil world and everything belonging to it. Only then can we serve the Lord with understanding.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A warning before a blow

God threatens the blow before it lands. One writer sees a pattern across the plagues:

The fifth plague is now threatened by command of the Lord... A very severe "murrain," or "plague," would come on them. Again the Israelites would be completely spared. So it came to pass. On one side of the line of separation there was death, on the other not one animal was affected. This again was plainly the hand of God, but Pharaoh was unmoved, and remained hard and unrepentant. Therefore, as we see in verse 8, God tells Moses to act without giving Pharaoh any warning of what was coming... it seems to be a part of God's ways to warn twice, and if no one pays attention, then to strike the third time without any warning.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Where the blow landed

Cattle were not a minor asset in Egypt. This plague hit the nation where it was rich:

The fifth plague strikes animal creation. Cattle, like those named at the start of this chapter, were the most important part of Egypt's wealth. So the blow falls on Egypt's wealth. But God waited and warned before He carried out this judgment... Notice Pharaoh's curiosity. He sent to see if Israel had escaped, and found that not one had died. Yet his heart was hardened.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another writer counts what Egypt lost in a single stroke:

In one moment the blow deprived Egypt of its cavalry and of the service of its famous war chariots. It took away the beasts of burden from the trader. It removed the raw material from a large class of manufacturers. Above all, it destroyed a very important element in its religious worship. The ram was an emblem of a deity, as were bulls, cows, and goats!

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The timing made it worse:

The blow was sharper because of what came just before it. Pharaoh went back even on his promise of three days' absence. Moses had argued that it was not workable for Israel to sacrifice what the Egyptians held sacred in front of their eyes. How many victims fell now! It is well known what the ox and the sheep were in their eyes.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The cost of holding on

One writer draws a lesson that outlasts Egypt:

There is a pointed lesson in this: the selfish greed of man eventually destroys the very things that are necessary to serve his interests.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Claim — God calls Himself "the God of the Hebrews" and calls slaves "my people". He takes up their cause and will take no denial.

- Purpose — The release has an aim attached: service. Israel could not worship inside the land that held them, so they had to come out.

- Order — Deliverance comes first, service second. A people must be free before they can truly serve.

- Warning — God speaks the threat before the plague falls. One writer sees a pattern: God warns twice, then strikes the third time unannounced.

- Cost — The blow struck Egypt's wealth, its war animals, and its sacred beasts. Israel's herds lost nothing. Holding on to what God claims destroys the very thing you held it for.

Exodus 9:2 · Darby

For if thou refuse to let them go, and shalt retain them still,

God's message to Pharaoh comes with a condition attached: keep holding My people, and My hand falls on what you own. That warning opens the fifth plague and raises two questions — why God warns before He strikes, and what refusing costs the one who refuses.

The Warning Before the Blow

The demand of verse 1 does not stand alone. It carries a penalty, and one writer finds both persistence and patience in God here.

The God of the Hebrews was persistent. He would take no denial… But God, the God of the Hebrews, was, and is, slow to anger. So the fresh summons to let His people go came with a warning about the penalty for disobeying it: "If you refuse to let them go and still hold them, behold, the hand of the LORD will fall with a very severe plague upon your livestock that are in the field."

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

More warnings would come, but not forever. One writer notices a rhythm in the plagues.

So, as we see in verse 8, God tells Moses to act without giving Pharaoh any warning of what was coming. Note that this also marked the third plague, and we find it again at the ninth. Our chapters say nothing about it. But it seems to be part of God's ways to warn twice, and then, if no one listens, to strike the third time with no warning at all.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Nothing Less Than Full Release

The verse names a particular refusal — not a flat no, but holding on. God had claimed these people as His own.

He claimed full deliverance for the people, on the ground of their being His, and so that they might hold a feast to Him in the wilderness. When it comes to His elect, nothing can ever satisfy God but their complete release from the yoke of bondage. "Loose him, and let him go" is really the great motto in God's gracious dealings with people held in bondage by Satan. They are still the objects of His eternal love.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Blow Lands on Egypt's Wealth

The threatened stroke is not random. It falls on the livestock — and in Egypt, livestock was money.

The fifth plague strikes animal creation. Cattle, such as those mentioned at the opening of this chapter, formed the most important part of the wealth of Egypt. Egypt's wealth is therefore stricken. But God waited and warned before He carried out this judgment. Jehovah's power sheltered Israel in Goshen, and not a beast suffered there.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Blow Lands on Egypt's Gods

These animals were more than property. One writer links the blow to what Egypt worshipped.

God sent the cattle plague not only to humble Egypt, but also to rebuke the profane belief in the sacredness of its bull and cow gods.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The timing sharpened the blow. One writer points to what had happened just before it.

This blow was all the sharper because of what came just before. Pharaoh had gone back even on his promise of a three days' absence. And Moses had argued how unwise it would be for them to sacrifice what the Egyptians held sacred before their eyes. How many victims fell now! It is well known what the ox and the sheep were in their eyes.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Refusing Costs the Refuser

Pharaoh held on to the people for his own gain. He lost his livestock instead. One writer draws a lasting principle from this.

There is a pointed lesson in this: the selfish greed of man ends up destroying the very things he needs to serve his interests.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The refusal was no small matter. It set a man against God, and one writer traces where that led.

So he places himself in direct and complete opposition to God. A solemn position! And this opposition never lessened. It went on until it ended in the overthrow and destruction of Pharaoh and his armies.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned — God states the penalty before He sends it; He is slow to anger, and the threat is an open door, not yet a closed one.

- Warned twice — warning, warning, then a stroke with no warning at all. Patience has a limit.

- Held — the sin here is not saying no, but holding on. God claims full release, and nothing less satisfies Him.

- Hit — the hand falls on livestock, which was Egypt's wealth and Egypt's worship at once.

- Lost — holding what God claims destroys the very thing you wanted to keep. Pharaoh's stand ended in ruin.

Exodus 9:3 · Darby

behold, the hand of Jehovah shall be on thy cattle which is in the field, on the horses, on the asses, on the camels, on the oxen and on the sheep, with a very grievous plague.

Moses comes back to Pharaoh with the same demand. This time the threat falls on Egypt's animals out in the open field. The verse raises two questions. Why does God announce the blow before He sends it? And why does He strike animals rather than people?

Warning before the blow

The threat comes with a condition: "if you refuse". One writer sees patience in that, and notes who paid for Pharaoh's stubbornness.

The God of the Hebrews was persistent. He would take no denial. The slaves of Pharaoh, of Israel's race, had One who took up their cause. But God, the God of the Hebrews, was, and is, slow to anger. So along with the fresh summons to let His people go there was the warning about the penalty for disobeying it… The animals had not sinned. They suffered for Pharaoh's disobedience. No human life was in danger. Animals died all around. The herds and flocks in the fields perished.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

What "livestock" covers here

The Hebrew word behind "livestock" carries the idea of property.

The Hebrew uses various words for the cow and the ox as 'cattle.' One of them, miqneh, is often translated 'cattle,' but it means 'possession.' The main property of nomadic tribes was their cattle. The word also includes sheep and goats, but not horses and donkeys.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The verse limits the plague to animals "in the field". That detail answers an old objection. If every animal died here, what could the hail strike later in the chapter?

We suggest this explanation. Some cattle were left out in the field day and night. Others were housed at times in stalls or other shelters. Exodus 9:3 mentions only cattle in the field. It says nothing about shelter for them at the homesteads. But verse 19 shows that cattle could be sheltered — a distinction which may throw light on the matter.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Egypt struck where it was rich

Horses and donkeys head the list, and the blow falls on what made Egypt rich. The same writer sees a pattern in how God warns.

The first three plagues had caused terrible trouble for Egypt. The fourth had ruined their possessions. The fifth was to strike them in one of the chief sources of their wealth. Horses and donkeys are mentioned first, and Egypt was famous for these animals… God's way seems to be to warn twice. If no one pays attention, He strikes the third time without any warning.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The same stroke reached Egypt's army, its trade and its temples in one moment.

In one moment the blow stripped Egypt of its cavalry and of the service of its famous war chariots. It took the beasts of burden from the trader. It removed the raw material from a large class of manufacturers. Above all, it destroyed a very important part of its religious worship. The ram was an emblem of a deity, as were bulls, cows, and goats!

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The gods of Egypt exposed

Egypt's animals stood for its gods. So the death of the herds struck at its religion.

The declaration went out, "on all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgments!" Each blow insults and humbles some of them… The bull-god, Apis, cannot protect himself or his fellow cattle from the disease.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A line drawn through the fields

God aims the threat at "your livestock" — Pharaoh's, not Israel's.

The plague came and the cattle died. Once again a guarding wall stood around Israel, this time protecting the flocks and the herds. So even in a field where Egyptian and Hebrew cattle grazed together, all the Egyptian animals died, and the Hebrews lost not one.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

That protection had a limit, and the limit explains why a lamb was later required.

Ten plagues in all fell upon rebellious Egypt. The captive Israelites were plainly exempt from nine of them… So the LORD openly showed the difference between those who were His and those who were not His. But then came the moment when the angel of death had to pass through the land… Israel could stay exempt no longer. God's grace had favoured this people in His sovereignty, yet they were sinners like all others (Ezekiel 20:5-9). So they could be spared the last dreadful stroke only on some righteous ground. This is why God prescribed the lamb.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Hand announced — God names the blow first and ties it to Pharaoh's refusal. He is slow to anger, and He warns before He strikes.

- Hand on wealth — Those animals were Egypt's money, transport, army and industry. The blow fell on a chief source of its wealth.

- Hand on idols — Bulls, cows and rams stood for Egypt's gods. The disease exposed gods who could not protect even themselves.

- Hand withheld — In shared fields the Egyptian animals died and the Hebrew animals lived. Anyone could see the difference.

- Hand satisfied — Being Israelite was not enough at the last plague. Only the lamb gave a righteous ground for sparing them.

Exodus 9:4 · Darby

And Jehovah will distinguish between the cattle of Israel and the cattle of Egypt; and there shall nothing die of all that the children of Israel have.

God announces the fifth plague before it falls, and the warning carries a promise: disease will sweep Egypt's herds, but Israel will not lose one animal. Why does God draw this visible line between two peoples living in the same land?

A line through the middle of Egypt

God kept the promise exactly. Even that proof left Pharaoh unchanged.

A very severe disease would strike Egypt's animals, and again there would be complete exemption for the Israelites. And so it happened. On one side of the line of separation there was death; on the other, not one animal was touched. This again was plainly the hand of God, but Pharaoh was unmoved, and remained hard and unrepentant.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The dividing line followed the owner, not the field.

The plague came and the cattle died. Once more a guarding wall was built around Israel, this time protecting the flocks and the herds. Even in a field where Egyptian and Hebrew cattle grazed together, all the Egyptian animals died, and the Hebrews lost not one.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Where the blow landed

God aimed this blow at Egypt's wealth, and He gave warning before it fell.

The fifth plague strikes animal creation. Cattle, like those listed at the start of this chapter, were the most important part of Egypt's wealth. Egypt's wealth is therefore stricken. But God waited and warned before He carried out this judgment. Jehovah's power sheltered Israel in Goshen, and not a beast suffered there.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Egypt's gods die in the field

The animals spared and the animals killed were not neutral property. Egypt worshipped some of them, so the plague fell on the country's religion as well as its economy.

God sent this cattle disease not only to humble Egypt, but also to rebuke its irreverent belief that its bull and cow gods were sacred.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Behind the separate blows stood one quarrel, and it reached past Pharaoh to his gods.

He dealt this way with Pharaoh as the oppressor of His people, and as a picture of the god of this world. So His conflict was with Pharaoh and everything Pharaoh trusted in. We therefore read that He executed judgment on the gods of Egypt. This was the brilliant display of God's victorious power in the stronghold of Satan; for if Satan rises in conflict with God, the issue can only end in his utter defeat.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A distinction anyone could verify

Pharaoh checked the claim for himself. What he found should have settled the matter.

The plague fell on the cattle, horses, donkeys, camels, and sheep that were in the fields, and every animal it attacked died. Of the cattle of the children of Israel none were struck. Pharaoh sent to confirm this. You would have thought that finding them all safe would have convinced him that he was fighting the Almighty. But he would not let Israel go.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What the sparing did not mean

Israel's protection through these plagues was real, but it had a limit. When judgment moved from property to firstborn sons, being God's people was not enough on its own.

Ten plagues in all fell upon rebellious Egypt. From nine of them the captive Israelites were plainly exempt. When their oppressors were wrapped in darkness that could be felt, the Israelites had light in their homes. When the deadly disease destroyed the cattle of the Egyptians, the cattle of the Israelites escaped unharmed… So Jehovah openly marked out the difference between those who were His and those who were not His. But when the moment came that the angel of death had to be sent through the land… Israel could be exempted no longer. However favoured these people might be, in the sovereignty of God's grace, they were sinners like all others. So if they were to be spared the last dreadful stroke, some righteous ground for this had to be found. This is why the lamb was prescribed.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned first. God named both the target and the exemption before the plague fell, so no one could call the result an accident.

- Wealth struck. Cattle held most of Egypt's wealth, and that is where the fifth plague fell.

- Gods struck. The same blow rebuked Egypt's sacred bulls and cows. God's quarrel was with Pharaoh and everything Pharaoh trusted in.

- Line drawn. Egyptian and Hebrew herds grazed in the same field. Every Egyptian animal died, and the Hebrews lost none.

- Line's limit. Pharaoh checked the report, found Israel untouched, and still refused. When the last judgment came, even Israel needed the blood of a lamb.

Exodus 9:5 · Darby

And Jehovah appointed a set time, saying, To-morrow will Jehovah do this thing in the land.

God announces the fifth plague a full day before it lands, and He names the time. He says when He will act, and then acts at that hour. So the disaster is not bad luck. It is signed work — and it leaves one question. What will a warned man do with the night God gives him?

The Word Runs Ahead of the Blow

In these chapters God speaks a sentence, and it happens as spoken. One writer traces the chain of "tomorrows" running through the plagues.

"Tomorrow," Moses had said — and what "tomorrows" there had been. "Tomorrow" Moses had said the swarms of flies would come (8:23). On the next day they came. "Tomorrow" the cattle plague had been threatened. The next day came, and the disease appeared (9:5). "Tomorrow" the hail had been predicted (9:18). On the next day the Lord rained hail on the land. Each time God sent the plague He had foretold. It did not delay a single day. Just one night came between the warning and the plague each time. And Pharaoh, waking on the new day, had to hear of the sorrow and destruction spreading over the country.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why God Names a Day

The delay was not hesitation. A full day stood between the sentence and the blow. One writer reads that gap as room left for Pharaoh to change his mind. He also contrasts it with how God speaks to people now.

God's patience is so great that He sent Moses to Pharaoh once more, with a protest and a demand that he let the people go… In the previous chapter God twice announced a plague for tomorrow. That gave at least twenty-four hours of delay, in case Pharaoh should relent. In contrast to this, salvation, as we know, is always presented today.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What "This Thing" Cost Egypt

God's promised blow fell on livestock. In Egypt that touched transport, army, industry and religion at once.

In one moment the blow stripped Egypt of its cavalry and of the use of its famous war chariots. It took away the trader's pack animals. It removed the raw material from a large class of manufacturers. Above all, it destroyed a very important part of Egypt's religious worship. The ram was an emblem of a deity, as were bulls, cows, and goats!

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

A Strike Aimed at Egypt's Gods

Egypt did not just own cattle. It worshipped them. So the same writer sees a second purpose behind the animal deaths, beyond economic ruin.

God sent the cattle plague not only to humble Egypt, but also to rebuke the irreverence of believing its bull and cow gods were sacred.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Proof Checked, and Ignored

The day God named came, and the loss came with it. What Pharaoh did next is the surprise.

It fell on the cattle, horses, donkeys, camels, and sheep that were in the fields, and all that were struck died. Of the cattle of the children of Israel, none were struck. Pharaoh sent to verify this, and one would have thought that finding them all safe would have convinced him he was fighting the Almighty. But he would not let Israel go.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why the Testing Ran So Long

God knew how Pharaoh would answer. So why keep warning and waiting, plague after plague? One writer says the process was for those watching, not for God.

He knows everything, so He knew that all nine plagues would not subdue the stubborn heart of Pharaoh. But the angelic rulers and powers in heavenly places do not know everything, and neither do men on earth. So He tested Pharaoh and gave space for repentance, as plague followed plague with increasing severity. Then no one could rightly question the final stroke when it came.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Set — God fixed the hour before He acted. The word came first, the blow came on time. No one could call it bad luck.

- Spared — the fixed time came with a fixed boundary. Egypt's animals died; Israel's did not. Pharaoh checked it himself.

- Space — the gap to "tomorrow" was mercy with a deadline. Commentators read it as a day held open for Pharaoh to change his mind. Salvation, they add, is offered today.

- Shamed — the blow fell on the bull and cow that Egypt worshipped. The loss reached past its wealth and army into its religion.

- Stubborn — the appointed day proved everything, yet Pharaoh did not move. The repeated warnings left his final judgment beyond dispute.

Exodus 9:6 · Darby

And Jehovah did this thing on the following day, and all the cattle of Egypt died; but of the cattle of the children of Israel died not one.

The fifth blow against Egypt falls on the herds, not the people, and it lands the very day God said it would. All the Egyptian livestock dies and Israel loses none — so why does God draw the line so openly, and what does "all" mean here?

A threat carried out on schedule

God named the plague, set the day, and then sent it. One writer traces the promise straight through to the result.

A very severe cattle disease, or "plague," would come on them, and again the Israelites would be completely spared. And so it happened. On one side of the dividing line there was death; on the other, not one animal was harmed.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Struck in their property

The blow fell on property. The word behind "livestock" says what these animals meant to their owners.

The word miqneh, often used for "cattle," means "possession," because the main property of wandering tribes was their cattle. The word also includes sheep and goats, but not horses and donkeys.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A blow to Egypt's gods

Some of the animals that died were not just property. Egypt worshipped them, so the plague struck at its religion too.

The bull was treated as a god. People worshipped him, poured prayers into his ears in his stable, and expected favours from him. The worship of Apis was not the worship of a mere bull, but the worship of what the deity had produced. Through Apis the deity was thought to show himself to men. So the truth of God was turned into a lie.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The moment it fell mattered too. Pharaoh had just offered to let Israel sacrifice inside Egypt, and Moses refused: those sacrifices would have horrified the Egyptians.

The blow was all the sharper because of what had just happened. Pharaoh had gone back even on his promise of a three days' journey, and before that Moses had argued how unwise it would be to sacrifice, in full view of the Egyptians, what they found detestable. How many victims fell now! Everyone knows what the ox and the sheep meant to them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not one belonging to Israel

The line was not just about where the animals stood. Where Egyptian and Hebrew animals grazed side by side, the plague still separated them.

The plague came and the cattle died. Once more a protecting wall stood around Israel, this time around the flocks and the herds. Even in a field where Egyptian and Hebrew cattle grazed together, all the Egyptian animals died, and the Hebrews lost not one.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Did Israel suffer under the earlier plagues too? One writer thinks so, and draws a lesson from it about Israel's own past.

At the fifth plague, God openly separates His people from the Egyptians. This seems to imply that Israel had suffered along with them in the earlier plagues. And if so, rightly; for Joshua later tells them they had served the gods of Egypt. They had to learn by experience the sin and folly of idolatry. But now, having taught His people that the gods of Egypt were no gods, God puts a difference between them and their oppressors.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What "all" means here

Cattle turn up again later in the chapter, when God announces the hail. So how could all of them have died? Writers give different answers.

The answer may be that the word "all" in verse 6 is not meant to be absolute, but used in a general sense. Or else other livestock could have been brought in after the fifth plague.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Another answer turns on where the animals were kept.

The cattle plague killed all the animals left out to graze. The hail would strike any cattle that had shelters, if they were not brought back into them.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Evidence checked, and refused

Pharaoh investigated. The result was proof, and the proof changed nothing.

Notice Pharaoh's curiosity. He sent men to see if Israel had escaped, and found that not one animal had died. What proof that the Lord God of the Hebrews is the Lord! Yet his heart stayed hard.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Announced — God named the plague a day ahead, and it fell as promised: death on one side of the line, no loss on the other.

- Aimed — the blow hit property, not people: the word for cattle means "possession," the main wealth of a herding people.

- Answered — Egypt prayed to a bull, yet the god said to show himself through Apis could not save one herd.

- Apart — even in a shared field, Israel's animals lived. God Himself put the difference between His people and their oppressors.

- Adamant — Pharaoh sent men to check, got his proof, and stayed hard. Evidence alone never changes a set will.

Exodus 9:7 · Darby

And Pharaoh sent, and behold, there was not one of the cattle of the Israelites dead. But the heart of Pharaoh was hardened, and he did not let the people go.

Pharaoh does something unusual for him: he checks the report. He finds the Israelite herds untouched, and then refuses to let the people go anyway.

The investigation that proved the miracle

The king did not act on rumour. He checked for himself, and what he found matched the warning God had given.

The fifth plague strikes animal creation. Cattle formed the most important part of the wealth of Egypt, so Egypt's wealth is stricken. But God waited and warned before He executed this judgment. Jehovah's power sheltered Israel in Goshen and not a beast suffered there. Notice Pharaoh's curiosity. He sent to see if Israel had escaped and found that not one had died. What an evidence that the Lord God of the Hebrews is the Lord. Yet his heart was hardened.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What one blow took from Egypt

The livestock were not just farm animals.

In one moment the blow took away Egypt's cavalry and the use of its famous war chariots. It took the beasts of burden from the trader. It removed the raw material from a large group of manufacturers. Above all, it destroyed a very important element in its religious worship. The ram was an emblem of a deity, as were bulls, cows, and goats!

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

That last point turns the plague into a contest with Egypt's gods.

There went out the decree, "On all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgments!" Each blow insults and humbles some among them. Serapis blushes till his Nile waters, once so clear, turn blood red. Ra, the sun-god, is forced to smile on Israel and frown on Egypt. The sacred frog and fly become objects of disgust. The bull-god, Apis, cannot protect himself or his fellow cattle from the disease.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A line drawn through the same pasture

The difference was not one of geography. God made it. Animals grazing side by side met opposite ends.

The plague came and the cattle died. Once more a guardian wall was built around Israel, this time protecting the flocks and the herds. Egyptians and Hebrews sometimes grazed their cattle together in one field. Even there, all the Egyptian animals died, and the Hebrews lost not one.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

One writer traces this separation back to a lesson God had to teach Israel first.

At the fifth plague, God expressly separates His people from the Egyptians. This seems to imply that Israel suffered along with them in the earlier plagues. And if so, it was just; Joshua later tells them they had served the gods of Egypt. They had to learn from experience the sin and folly of idolatry. Now, having taught His people that the gods of Egypt were no gods, God puts a difference between them and their oppressors. They are not tormented with flies; they have light in their dwellings; their cattle did not die; there was no hail in the land of Goshen.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A heart that facts could not reach

Proof did not produce repentance. The king watched his country's wealth die and showed no feeling at all.

Still Pharaoh refused to free the people. Dogged obstinacy marked him. The sight of the dying and dead cattle did not move him. The silent appeal of suffering animals, enough to soften a hard heart, seemed lost on him. The loss to his people, suddenly stripped of so much valuable property, did not concern him. He must have heard of the great damage caused by the disease. But we have no record of one word of regret from him, nor the slightest hint that he sympathised with his suffering people.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Whose hardening comes first

The order of events matters here. Writers point out that Scripture does not say God hardened Pharaoh's heart until the next plague.

It is indeed true that God hardened Pharaoh's heart. But He did so only after Pharaoh had shown extreme and incredible arrogance by saying, "Who is the Lord, that I should obey his voice …?" (Ex. 5:2) — and only after he had repeatedly hardened his own heart. In fact, the Spirit uses two different words in the original language. He states no less than seven times that Pharaoh hardened his heart (Ex. 7:13, 14, 22; 8:15, 19, 32; 9:7). Only after that does He say that God hardened the heart of Pharaoh (Ex. 9:12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The pattern is not locked in ancient history. Refusing what you already know to be true has a predictable effect.

To trifle with any truth is dangerous, and hardening of heart is the necessary result. How many people have a conscience paralysed in one spot (if we may say so), because they refused what they once recognised as the voice of God! Perhaps they refused to listen to something they feared God might be speaking through.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned. God waited and warned before He struck, so Pharaoh had time to yield.

- Struck. The blow fell on Egypt's wealth, army, trade and worship at once — even the bull-god could not save his own kind.

- Severed. A line ran through shared pastures: the Egyptians' cattle died, and the Hebrews lost none.

- Verified. Pharaoh checked the miracle himself, then refused in the face of evidence he had seen.

- Hardened. The hardening here is still Pharaoh's own. God's hardening comes only later. Trifling with truth you already know is the danger this story warns about.

Exodus 9:8 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses and to Aaron, Take to yourselves handfuls of ashes of the furnace, and let Moses scatter it toward the heavens before the eyes of Pharaoh.

This blow against Egypt comes with no warning. God tells Moses to take ashes from a furnace and throw them into the air while the king watches. The act looks small. So why ashes, why in front of Pharaoh, and why sores?

A blow that arrives unannounced

God gave Pharaoh no warning this time. He simply told Moses what to do.

In this case there was no previous warning. The Lord told Moses to take ashes from a furnace in his hands and to scatter them toward the heavens in the sight of Pharaoh. He was evidently to toss them upward, so that the wind would spread them in every direction. As he did this, the ashes became a fine dust. It carried such infection that it brought boils on people and animals.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Why ashes from a furnace

The choice of material carried a message. Egypt had worked Israel at its kilns. Now the ashes of a furnace fall back on Egypt itself. Where the ESV says "soot from the kiln," older translations read "ashes of the furnace," and the commentators use that older wording.

The word "furnace" comes from a word meaning "to subdue." Some think it was a lime-kiln, or a furnace for smelting ore. It was connected with those public works in Egypt where Israel had to labour so cruelly. Egypt itself had been such a furnace for the people of God, and so it had earned righteous retribution for itself. This seems a very natural explanation of Moses' significant action.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Commentators differ on which furnace is meant. Another view links the ashes to Egypt's own worship, and looks ahead to worse.

The ashes of the furnace have a double meaning. Egypt in its fiery persecution of Israel is called a furnace. Divine retribution now came upon them in the boils, which must have burned like fire. But the furnace may have been the altar in Egypt on which sacrifices were offered to their god Typhon. Most likely the Egyptians brought such sacrifices to stop the plagues. Now the very thing they trusted in becomes a plague. This plague was the first that put human life in danger. So it pointed ahead to the death Pharaoh would bring on himself and his people by his wicked opposition.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Done openly, with nothing to hide

God told Moses to do this where Pharaoh could see. That rules out any thought of a magician's trick.

Obedient to God, they acted as directed. Moses sprinkled the ashes towards heaven in the sight of Pharaoh. Clearly this was no trick of magicians, such as Jannes and Jambres might have played. Pharaoh saw what Moses did. Pharaoh heard no muttering of spells; Moses used none. He probably spoke no word; certainly none was needed. Pharaoh knew that in the ordinary way such means could do no harm to man or beast. But when God works, the results are certain, and they may be immediate.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The end of Egypt's experts

The dust settled on Egypt's magicians too. Their loss here was the third in a row.

The burning was evidently connected with a religious rite, since the ashes falling on the priests left them unfit to serve before their gods. Boils and sores broke out over them. Three times Jehovah had struck them. He had taken away their rods of authority. He had taken away their power of enchantment. Now He had taken away their ability to carry on with their religious rites. We hear no more of the magicians after this; they "could not stand before Moses" (v. 11).

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

What the sores picture

The sores fell on a people who prized cleanliness. The outbreak on the skin also pictures what sin does when it works its way out.

All commentators note that the uncleanness caused by such an attack must have been especially hard on a people like the Egyptians. They were very careful about personal cleanliness, and this was part of their religion. As a picture, the plague speaks well of the corruption of sin. It is the breaking out of that moral disease which Isaiah describes in words that might have been drawn from it: "From the sole of the foot even to the head, there is no soundness in it, but bruises and sores and raw wounds" (Isa. 1:6).

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The plague also shows how God deals with settled rebellion.

The boils breaking out from the dust of the furnace show that God will leave man to his own corruption if he persists in his rebellion.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Furnace. Egypt made Israel labour at its kilns. Now the furnace's own ashes fall back on Egypt as righteous retribution.

- Handfuls. A handful of ashes has no power to harm. The disease comes at once, because God is behind it, not a spell.

- Sight. Moses acts in front of Pharaoh, with no muttered spells. The king cannot mistake it for a magician's trick.

- Sores. The sores picture the corruption of sin breaking out. God leaves man to that corruption when he keeps refusing.

- Silence. The magicians lose their rods, their spells, and even their rites. They cannot stand before Moses, and we hear no more of them.

Exodus 9:9 · Darby

And it shall become fine dust over all the land of Egypt, and shall become boils on man and on cattle, breaking out [with] blisters, throughout the land of Egypt.

The sixth blow against Egypt comes with no warning. Moses throws ashes into the air in front of Pharaoh, and God turns that small act into a plague on the skin of a whole nation.

A handful of ashes over a whole land

The Lord's instruction was simple. The wind did the rest.

In this case there was no previous warning. The Lord told Moses to take ashes from a furnace in his hands and to scatter them toward the heavens in front of Pharaoh. He was clearly to toss them upward, so that the wind would carry them in every direction. As he did this, the ashes became a fine dust, and it carried an infection that brought boils on people and animals.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

It all happened in the open, in front of the king. There was no trick to point to.

Pharaoh saw what Moses did. Pharaoh heard no muttering of spells; Moses used none. Probably he said no word; he certainly needed none. Pharaoh knew that in an ordinary way such means would do no harm to man or beast. When God works, however, He brings about results that are certain, and that may be immediate.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Why ashes from a furnace

The material itself carries a message. Writers link the furnace to what Israel suffered in Egypt.

Egypt had been "a smoking furnace" (Gen. 15:17), and the children of Abraham had been plunged into it. Now the ashes of that furnace were to fall back on the heads of their oppressors, striking them with boils and blisters.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

That wording follows an older translation of Genesis 15:17. One writer sees a double meaning in the ashes.

The ashes of the furnace have a double meaning. Egypt in its fiery persecution of Israel is called a furnace. Divine retribution now came upon them in the boils, which must have burned like fire. But the furnace may have been the altar in Egypt on which sacrifices were offered to their god Typhon. Most likely the Egyptians brought such sacrifices to stop the plagues. Now the very thing they trusted in becomes a plague itself.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Boils breaking out in sores

The Hebrew word behind "boils" is shechin. The same disease appears elsewhere in Scripture.

The Hebrew word shechin means a common swelling on the flesh, with inflammation. The boils were no doubt malignant when God sent them as a plague in Egypt, Ex. 9:9-11; and they were severe in the case of Job when Satan struck him. Job 2:7.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Egypt's pride in cleanness

Egypt made personal cleanness part of its religion. This plague hit Egyptians where they cared most.

All commentators note the same thing. Such an attack left people unclean, and that must have been especially severe on the Egyptians. They were so careful about personal cleanliness, and they made it part of their religion. As a type, this fits the corruption of sin. It pictures the outbreak of that moral disease which Isaiah describes in words that might have been drawn from this plague: "From the sole of the foot even to the head there is no soundness in it, but bruises and sores and raw wounds" (Isa. 1:6).

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What the sore reveals

The plague did not put something new into Egypt. It brought what was already there to the surface.

This exposes the inward condition of the world. As already said, these plagues only show the true state of things before God... And who is exempt? Only the one whose heart holds Christ as its object, and whom the "precious and very great promises" deliver from the "corruption that is in the world because of sinful desire."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Another writer, discussing a later plague of sores, points back to this one.

The plague here referred to as "an evil and grievous sore" reminds us of the sixth Egyptian plague (Ex. 9:10-11). This was the first of the plagues that attacked the persons of the Egyptians... It was a disgusting and loathsome disease (see Deut. 28:27, 35).

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Summary

- Handful. Moses throws ashes from a furnace into the air in front of the king. He says no spell. Only God explains what follows.

- Furnace. Egypt had been the furnace that burned Israel; its own ashes now fall back on the oppressor. It may also have been an altar where Egypt sacrificed to stop the plagues.

- Flesh. The dust becomes shechin: a swelling on the flesh with inflammation. This is the first plague to strike Egyptian bodies, and the same disease Job suffered.

- Filth. A nation that built its religion on physical cleanness is made unclean; as a picture it speaks of the corruption of sin, "no soundness in it."

- Fully exposed. The plague adds nothing new. It brings the real state of things into the open. Only the one whose heart holds Christ escapes the corruption in the world.

Exodus 9:10 · Darby

And they took ashes of the furnace, and stood before Pharaoh; and Moses sprinkled it toward the heavens; and it became boils [with] blisters breaking out on man and on cattle.

In the sixth plague, Moses takes soot from a kiln and throws it into the air while Pharaoh watches. The dust settles into painful sores on people and animals across Egypt. Two questions follow: why ashes, and why does this plague silence the magicians for good?

An act done in the open

Pharaoh watched the whole thing from start to finish. What he saw was ordinary dust doing what dust cannot do.

They obeyed God and did as they were told. Moses sprinkled the ashes towards heaven in front of Pharaoh. Clearly this was no magician's trick, such as Jannes and Jambres, Egypt's magicians, might have played. Pharaoh heard no muttered spells; the men used none. Probably no one spoke a word; certainly none was needed. Pharaoh knew that in the ordinary way such means would produce no harm to man or beast. But when God works, the results are certain, and they may come at once. Straight away, boils breaking out into sores (perhaps pustules or ulcers) struck man and beast.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why ashes from a furnace

The material is not random. A furnace is what Israel had been laboring at, and what Egypt itself had been to them.

The word "furnace" comes from a word meaning "to subdue." Some think it was a lime-kiln, or a kiln for smelting ore. It was linked with the public works in Egypt where Israel had to labor so cruelly. Egypt itself had been such a furnace for the people of God, and had earned for itself righteous retribution. This seems a very natural explanation of what Moses did... As a picture, it fittingly speaks of the corruption of sin, the breaking out of that moral disease. Isaiah describes it in words that might have been drawn from this plague: "From the sole of the foot even to the head, there is no soundness in it, but bruises and sores and raw wounds." (Isa. 1:6.)

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Commentators differ on the furnace. Another reading adds a second layer: the ashes may have come from an altar.

The ashes of the furnace have a double meaning. Egypt in its fiery persecution of Israel is called a furnace. Divine retribution now came upon them in the boils, which must have burned like fire. But the furnace may have been the altar in Egypt on which sacrifices were offered to their god Typhon. Most likely the Egyptians brought such sacrifices to stop the plagues. Now the very thing they trusted becomes a plague.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The first blow to their own bodies

Until now the plagues had struck other things. This one struck the Egyptians themselves.

The plague here referred to as "an evil and grievous sore" reminds us of the sixth Egyptian plague (Ex. 9:10-11). This was the first plague to attack the Egyptians in their own bodies. The magicians, or wise men, suffered under it especially. It was a disgusting and loathsome disease (see Deut. 28:27, 35).

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The sores also carried a warning of something worse ahead.

This plague was the first which endangered human life. So it pointed forward to the death Pharaoh would bring on himself and his people by his wicked opposition.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The magicians disappear

The magicians lost three things, one after another. The third loss ended them.

Three times Jehovah had struck them. He had taken away their rods of authority. He had taken away their power of enchantment. Now He had taken away their ability to carry on their religious rites. We hear no more of the magicians after this; they "could not stand before Moses" (v. 11).

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

What the collapse teaches

These men were Satan's tools, and their collapse teaches readers today.

More than this: if we hold steadily to God and His truth, the workings of Satan will be exposed in due time. Three times these instruments of his "withstood" Moses. But the plague of lice raised the question of producing life from the dust of the earth. There the magicians were powerless, and had to confess that it was "the finger of God." (Ex. 8:18-19.)... In the next chapter we find that they "could not stand before Moses because of the boils." (Ex. 9:11) They themselves had fallen under the punishing hand of God. So we may rest confidently, whatever success the evil one seems to have now; for "the God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet." (Rom. 16:20.)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Furnace — The ashes come from the kiln Israel slaved at. Egypt had been a furnace to God's people, and now the furnace falls back on Egypt.

- Open — No spells, nothing hidden: Pharaoh watched dust leave Moses' hand, and knew dust does not do this.

- Flesh — This is the first plague to reach the Egyptians' own bodies: a disgusting and loathsome disease, and the first to put life in danger.

- Silence — God took their rods, then their spells, then their religious rites. The magicians cannot stand before Moses, and are never heard of again.

- Hope — Satan's work is exposed in the end, so believers can rest while evil seems to be winning: God will soon crush Satan under their feet.

Exodus 9:11 · Darby

And the scribes could not stand before Moses because of the boils; for the boils were on the scribes, and on all the Egyptians.

The sixth blow against Egypt lands on the bodies of the Egyptians themselves — including the court magicians who had spent the earlier plagues copying Moses. Their collapse raises the question the whole contest has been driving at: who can stand when God acts?

The last stand of Egypt's magicians

Their defeat came in two stages. First they lost the contest in front of the king. Then the judgment reached their own bodies.

Shortly before that the magicians had owned their defeat. Aaron's rod struck the dust of the land, and it became lice. The magicians tried to produce lice too, but they could not. Defeated in front of the king, they told him that what Aaron had done was by the finger of God. The God of the Hebrews could do what they, with their incantations, could not. Already defeated, they now had to feel the power of God in their own bodies. The boil broke out on them, and "they could not stand before Moses because of the boils." God was triumphing, but Pharaoh stayed stubborn. Other plagues would follow, making clear what was already evident: the God of Moses and Aaron was the God of the whole earth. The Creator had absolute rights over His creatures, and no one could overturn them. How true the word is: "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God."

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why boils disqualified these men

The text singles out the magicians, and one writer links this to what their office as priests required.

The account makes a point of it: the boils were so severe that the magicians, suffering like everyone else, could not stand before Moses. They were completely defeated. We are not told why this striking of the magicians is singled out. But we know that these men, the very highest rank of idolatrous priests, had to be sound in body and clean. Without that they were not allowed to carry out their office or use their charms.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

One writer explains what the ashes did to these priests, and counts what God took from them.

The burning clearly had a connection with a religious rite, and the ashes falling on the priests made them unfit to serve their gods. Three times Jehovah had struck them. He had taken away their rods of authority. He had taken away their power of enchantment. And now He had taken away their ability to carry on their religious rites. We hear no more after this of the magicians; they "could not stand before Moses."

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Egypt's gods and Egypt's medicine both exposed

The disease struck at two things Egypt trusted: its ritual purity and its skill at healing.

Then came the sixth judgment: a boil breaking out with blisters on man and beast in all Egypt. It fell above all on the magicians, who could not stand before Moses. Such a festering eruption defeated their careful avoidance of impurity. The emptiness of their gods was as clear as that of their own arts of healing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Satan's imitators exposed

One writer traces how these men worked and how they were silenced.

that they "could not stand before Moses because of the boils." They themselves have fallen under the punishing hand of God. So we can rest in confidence, however successful the evil one seems now, because "The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Inward corruption brought to the surface

One writer marks out what was new about this plague.

This was the first of the plagues which attacked the persons of the Egyptians, and the magicians, or wise men, suffered under it above all. It was a disgusting and loathsome disease.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Another writer sees a moral picture in the sore.

This plague is typical of the personal moral corruption that results from resisting the truth of the Word of God.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Imitation. The magicians began by copying Moses — imitation is Satan's method.

- Confession. At the lice they ran out of power and had to admit, "This is the finger of God."

- Affliction. The judgment reaches their own bodies. The boil is on their own skin.

- Silence. God took their rods, their enchantments, and their fitness to serve their gods. They are never heard from again.

- Warning. Every power that sets itself against God ends the same way: unable to stand. "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God."

Exodus 9:12 · Darby

And Jehovah made Pharaoh's heart stubborn, and he did not hearken to them, as Jehovah had told Moses.

The sixth plague hits without warning: Moses throws ashes into the air, boils break out, and even Egypt's magicians cannot stand before him. Here, for the first time, the hardening comes from the LORD Himself — so how can God harden a man and still judge him fairly?

The plague that silenced the experts

One writer links the ashes to what Egypt had done to Israel. He also explains why boils shut the magicians out of their work.

This time Moses was to act in front of the king without any warning. He threw handfuls of ashes from the furnace into the air. Egypt had been "a smoking furnace" (Gen. 15:17), and the children of Abraham had been plunged into it. Now ashes from that furnace were to fall back on the heads of their oppressors and strike them with boils and blisters. The account makes a point of saying that the boils were so severe that the magicians, suffering like everyone else, could not stand before Moses. They were completely beaten. It gives no hint why the striking of the magicians is singled out. But we know these men were the very highest rank of idol priests, and they had to be sound and clean in body. Without that they could not carry out their office or work their charms.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The boils also carry a meaning, and even they left the king unmoved.

The magicians did not even try to copy this miracle, because they were struck with boils themselves... This plague is a picture of the personal moral corruption that comes from resisting the truth of the Word of God. But even this did not move Pharaoh to turn from his stubborn refusal of God's Word to let His people go.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Who hardened first

The order matters. Up to this point the record has read the other way round.

It is true that God hardened Pharaoh's heart. But He did so only after Pharaoh had shown extreme and incredible arrogance by saying, "Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice…?" (Ex. 5:2), and only after Pharaoh had hardened his own heart again and again. In fact the Spirit uses two different words in the original language. No fewer than seven times He says that Pharaoh hardened his heart (Ex. 7:13, 14, 22; 8:15, 19, 32; 9:7) before saying that God hardened the heart of Pharaoh (Ex. 9:12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Two words behind one English word

The verse ends by pointing back to what God had already said. The Hebrew also keeps a distinction that English hides, and the order of the two words is the point.

God had already said He would harden Pharaoh's heart, back in chapter 4:21. Eighteen times we read of the hardening of Pharaoh's heart. But the Hebrew uses different words to show an important distinction. One means to "make firm" or "strong." The other, "to make stubborn."... Pharaoh hardened himself, then God hardened him. Pharaoh had his opportunities. He refused them and went on in unbelief, so God made him stubborn. God hardens as an act of judgment because man refuses His Word. God never hardens first, and He never forces a man to be an unbeliever.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Where the guilt lies

The verse does not make God the author of Pharaoh's sin. The same order shows up elsewhere in Scripture.

God did not make Pharaoh wicked. God leads no man to sin; but when Pharaoh had proved himself wicked and stubborn, God hardened his heart in judgment. But this hardening never happens until a man has proved himself wicked. Fallen man, as Romans 1 describes him, gives God up first; only then does God give him up.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

No one needs to soften the statement. God also had an end in view.

There is no need at all for anyone to try to escape the full, plain sense of this very solemn statement. If a man resists the light of God's testimony, he is shut up to blindness and hardness of heart as a judgment. God leaves him to himself, and then Satan comes in and carries him headlong to destruction... the real disposition of his heart was to act against God, and therefore God left him to himself, and made him a monument for the display of His glory "through all the earth."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The pattern beyond Egypt

Pharaoh is one case in a series, and each one follows the same order.

There are five outstanding cases of this very solemn hardening on God's part: the non-Jewish nations, Rom. 1:28; Pharaoh or Egypt, Ex. 9:12; the kings of Canaan, Joshua 11:20; Israel, Isa. 6; Christendom, 2 Thess. 2. This hardening comes before destruction. But it comes only after much patience on God's part, and after man's incurable unbelief and stubborn refusal of God's testimony have shown that this judgment is necessary.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Warning. Boils picture the moral corruption that follows when a man resists God's Word. Not even Egypt's magicians could stand.

- Refusal. Seven times Pharaoh hardened his own heart before this verse says God hardened it. The order is never reversed.

- Patience. God's hardening comes only after long patience, repeated warning and repeated mercy. It never comes before His testimony, only after a man refuses it.

- Judgment. God did not make Pharaoh wicked. He left a man to himself who had already chosen to fight against Him.

- Glory. The stubbornness God let ripen became the stage for His power, so that His name would sound through all the earth.

Exodus 9:13 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Rise up early in the morning, and set thyself before Pharaoh, and say to him, Thus saith Jehovah, the God of the Hebrews Let my people go, that they may serve me.

God speaks again to a king who has already refused Him, and the demand has not changed by a word. Two questions follow. Why does God keep sending the same message to a hardened man? And what does "serve me" mean for a nation of slaves?

The message renewed at daybreak

Moses did not need an appointment. One writer points out how quickly this visit followed the last plague, and how little room Pharaoh had left to hide.

God's messengers, we presume, could enter the palace when the Lord commanded them. No place Pharaoh could go would put him beyond the reach of a message from God. Uninvited, Moses could appear, and very likely unexpectedly too. This proved true again. Moses sprinkled the ashes in front of the king on one day, and appeared early on the next. If Pharaoh had slept during the night, he must have been unsettled to face Moses and Aaron the next morning.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

"The God of the Hebrews"

God names Himself by a despised, enslaved people.

"Thus says the LORD, the God of the Hebrews, 'Let my people go, that they may serve me.'" The God of the Hebrews was persistent. He would take no denial. The slaves of Pharaoh, of Israel's race, had One who took up their cause. True, no invasion from beyond Egyptian territory threatened the security of the land. But a power did threaten its peace again. Pharaoh had felt that power before, and all the might of his armies could not deal with it, or even touch it.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

But the name meant nothing to Pharaoh. He judged this God by the state of His people.

He knew nothing of the Lord, the invisible and eternal God, and he laughed at the idea of His power. Were not the Lord's people Pharaoh's own slaves?

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Released for a purpose

The demand is never just "let them go." Each time, it is release for something.

And note, it is "that they may hold a feast to me." If they were to leave Pharaoh behind, it was so that they might begin with God. This was a great change. Instead of toiling under Pharaoh's taskmasters, they were to feast in the company of the Lord.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why they could not stay and serve

Why did they have to leave the country at all? The service God asked for had no place in Egypt.

The Exodus is the separation of the people of God from the world. One feature of the scene struck me. Israel was to go out of Egypt to serve the Lord, or hold a feast to Him. They could not serve Him or sacrifice to Him in the land of their slavery, in front of that people. Their religious service was of such a character that Egypt would not tolerate it.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

God's own reputation was bound up in getting them out.

A salvation which would have left them still in Egypt could not possibly be God's salvation. We must also keep in mind the Lord's purpose in saving Israel and in destroying Pharaoh. It was "that His name might be declared throughout all the earth." What declaration of that name or character could there be if His people were to try to worship Him in Egypt?

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Warning before the blow

The message that starts here goes on to say why Pharaoh was still alive.

A third time the word of the Lord came to Moses: "Rise up early in the morning and present yourself before Pharaoh." A protest followed. The words should be read to mean this: though God had stretched out His hand, He had not yet cut Pharaoh off. He kept him alive, so that Pharaoh might magnify God's name, either by humbling himself or by rejecting the divine warning.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Demand. The same words come again, unchanged. God takes no denial, and no palace puts a man beyond the reach of His message.

- Owner. He calls Himself the God of the Hebrews. The slaves Pharaoh counted as property had One who took up their cause, and the king's armies could not touch His power.

- Purpose. They are not just let go, they are let go to serve. They leave Pharaoh's taskmasters to begin with God, and trade toil for a feast.

- Distance. That service could not happen inside Egypt. A salvation that left them there would not be God's salvation, and would tell the world nothing true about His name.

- Mercy. Pharaoh was still alive only because God kept him alive. He had space to humble himself, or else to become proof of the power he refused.

Exodus 9:14 · Darby

For I will at this time send all my plagues to thy heart, and on thy bondmen, and on thy people; that thou mayest know that there is none like me in all the earth.

Plague after plague has already struck Egypt. Now Moses returns with the heaviest warning yet: this time God will strike Pharaoh himself, so the king who boasted that no one was like him will learn there is no one like God.

An Announcement Unlike Any Other

The wording itself sets this warning apart from the ones before it.

The way this solemn announcement is made in Exodus 9:14 points to a special and singular character in these grave events. Nothing in the history of nations, then or since, has matched them.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

God kept the threat of "all my plagues" open. Pharaoh heard that more was coming, but not what.

He had no rest. No one could bribe or ignore the God of the Hebrews. God demanded unconditional surrender, and sooner or later the king had to give it. Severe plagues had already come. More could follow, and would, if the king stayed stubborn. "All My plagues," said God. What would they be? They came one by one, and God announced the next only when the last had failed to break the king's obstinacy.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Sent to the Heart

God aims the plagues at Pharaoh himself, not only at his land. Older translations read "to your heart" where the ESV has "on you yourself." One writer sets God's words to Pharaoh beside His words to Moses about the same events.

To the proud Pharaoh, who in his haughtiness had said, "Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice and let Israel go? I do not know the LORD, and moreover, I will not let Israel go" (Ex. 5:2), God showed him his own nothingness. He was one of the inhabitants of the earth who are counted as nothing before Him… God said to Pharaoh, "I will at this time send all My plagues to your heart." But to Moses He says, "I will… multiply My signs and My wonders in the land of Egypt."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Knowing the God He Had Denied

Pharaoh could come to know God in one of two ways, and his refusal decided which.

Pharaoh said he did not know the Lord, but Pharaoh must know Him (Ex. 5:2; Ex. 9:14). If Pharaoh would disown Him in goodness, he must know Him in righteousness. His judgments were now coming into full view, and "the Lord is known by the judgment which He executes." As His holy prophet says to Him, "When your judgments are in the earth, the inhabitants of the world learn righteousness." God would be known in grace. But if Egypt refuses that lesson, she must know Him in the raised hand of power.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The Claim Pharaoh Had Made for Himself

God's closing phrase was Egypt's own claim for its king.

He was the god made flesh. He was actually divine, and at times would appear in a local group of three as one of its deities. In his own kingdom, and by flattering rulers abroad, he was addressed as a "god" — he even offered incense to himself! There was deep meaning in Pharaoh's enormous statues. They towered above temples and obelisks in city and plain, looking down on ordinary mortals… the mightiest, the most terrible, the supreme, none like him in all the earth.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The plagues then showed who really controls the natural world.

By His plagues, God showed that the heavenly bodies were only His servants. He called up darkness and hid the sun and moon from human sight. He also showed that the animal and vegetable kingdoms obeyed Him. He commanded, and insects, reptiles, fish and animals either arose or died, and at His word the trees and the fruit of the field perished… He proved Himself to be God, both creating and overruling.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Judgment as God's Strange Work

One writer explains why God, who delights in mercy, still had to act.

God was about "to do His work, His strange work, and perform His act, His unusual act." Judgment is His "strange work." He delights in mercy, but He must act consistently with all that He is. He had borne with great patience the many provocations of this proud and insolent monarch. By refusing to let God's people go, that king had made himself the declared enemy of God. So he brought on himself the necessity of learning that "Everyone who is arrogant in heart is an abomination to the LORD; be assured, he will not go unpunished."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal. Pharaoh said he did not know the Lord. The plagues are God's answer to that claim.

- Reach. The blow falls on the king himself, not only on his land. Older translations read that God sends the plagues "to your heart."

- Rival. Egypt called Pharaoh a god with none like him on earth. God claims that phrase for Himself, commanding darkness, insects, animals and trees at will.

- Reluctance. Judgment is God's strange work. He delights in mercy, and acts only after long patience.

- Result. Pharaoh will know the Lord either way — in grace if he receives it, or in the raised hand of power.

Exodus 9:15 · Darby

For now shall I put forth my hand, and I will smite thee and thy people with pestilence; and thou shalt be cut off from the earth.

Just before the plague of hail, God sends Moses to Pharaoh with the sharpest message the king had yet heard. It tells him what God could already have done to him — and had not done. The words look back, not forward. Pharaoh stands at the height of his power, yet he is alive only because God has held back His hand.

A life held in God's hand

The point of the words is that Pharaoh's survival was never his own achievement. He had defied God again and again, yet God had not carried out the sentence he deserved.

God tells him that his life was completely in God's hands. He could cut him off, but He had not… And why was he kept alive? It was to show him God's power, and to declare God's name throughout all the earth (15-16).

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Patience already stretched long

Pharaoh's cruelty did not begin with Moses' visits. He had been crushing Israel for years before God moved to rescue them. Judgment would have been just at any point along the way.

God could rightly have cut him off in his sin against Him at that time. Instead He bore with the wicked king. In the end He hardened his heart in His government of the world, so that Pharaoh rushed headlong into the jaws of death in a way designed to show God's power.

Modernised from Paul WilsonOriginal wording

Why God left the throne standing

If God did not strike him down, He had a reason. God had raised Pharaoh to that height. The fall of a man so high would carry much further than the fall of an ordinary man.

God knew the stubborn self-will and pride of this man. Working behind the scenes, He raised him up to a place where he could keep mistreating His people, and even step it up, and so bring matters to a head. The time was now right for God to deal with him, and in doing so to display His power in such a way that His name would be declared throughout all the earth. A scripture like Joshua 2:8-11 bears witness that the name of Jehovah was declared that way in those days. And even in our day, 3,500 years later, the fame of it has not died away.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Not made wicked, but exposed

That raises an obvious worry. If God kept Pharaoh alive for His own purposes, was Pharaoh's wickedness God's doing? Commentators are firm on this. The evil was already there. God's part was to expose it and at last to seal it.

God never makes a man bad. Pharaoh was already a bad man, and he grew worse by resisting God's most striking appeals. What God did was put him on show. He had been raised from among men to such a height that his downfall would strike consciences far and wide throughout the world. He was hard from the start, and at last God sealed him up in a judicial hardening.

Modernised from Paul WilsonOriginal wording

That distinction matters. God's patience with a man He could have destroyed does not mean the man was ever chosen for ruin.

The wicked are not chosen for eternal misery. Far from it. We find that God bears with them — vessels of wrath — with great patience. They are fitted for destruction not by Him, but by their own deeds.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Long patience, certain judgment

Pharaoh read God's restraint as weakness. Each pause looked to him like proof that nothing final would ever come. That mistake is what makes this verse a warning, not a comfort.

God showed His power at least in part when His dreadful judgment finally fell on Egypt. It came after much patience and many earlier steps, and through them all Pharaoh clearly told himself that nothing could touch him. God is patient today too, sending warning after warning to a stubborn world. Yet He will show His power, suddenly and terribly, to a world that is startled and still hard.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Spared. The verse is God telling a king that he is alive on borrowed time. God could have cut him off already. He chose instead to hold back His hand.

- Purposed. God kept him alive for a reason — to show His power in him and to spread His name through the whole earth. That report has still not died away.

- Endured. Pharaoh's cruelty long predates Moses' mission. What looks like slowness is God's patience with a man He could rightly have destroyed.

- Responsible. God never made Pharaoh bad. He exposed a wickedness already there, and at last sealed it in judicial hardening. Their own deeds, not God's choice, fit those who perish for destruction.

- Warned. Pharaoh mistook the delay for immunity. The same patience runs on today, warning after warning — and it ends the same way, when God shows His power suddenly.

Exodus 9:16 · Darby

And for this very cause have I raised thee up, to shew thee my power; and that my name may be declared in all the earth.

God pauses to tell Egypt's king why he is still alive and still on his throne. The answer has nothing to do with Pharaoh's greatness. These few words also raise one of the hardest questions in the Bible: how do God's sovereignty and human responsibility fit together?

Raised up: a life spared, a throne given

The words follow a warning: God could have wiped Pharaoh out already. So "raised you up" starts with keeping him alive.

God tells him that his life was wholly in divine hands. He might cut him off, but He had not. God, of whom Pharaoh had known nothing at all, controlled his destiny... And why was he kept alive? It was to show him God's power, and that God's name might be declared throughout all the earth.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The height of the throne mattered too.

If Pharaoh had been an ordinary man in Egypt, no one would have seen his stubborn heart in public. But God raised him to a high place... Every fresh show of Pharaoh's stubborn will only brought out a fresh show of the mighty power of God. His pursuit of Israel only put before people the mighty power that could dry up the Red Sea, save His people, and destroy Pharaoh and his army.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

God did not make him wicked

The verse says God raised Pharaoh up. It does not say God made him evil. Commentators are firm on that line.

God never made any man bad. But He may give people up to the consequences of their own folly and evil, and in certain cases He does. That is, He hardens in judgment those who disregard and reject His grace... Pharaoh was wicked, and his wickedness grew in proportion to the patience God displayed. In the end the God he had despised blinded him in judgment and made him an example. All are responsible. Sin destroys the capacity, not the responsibility of obeying God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

So the hardening is not God picking a victim at random. It is a sentence that fits the man.

Pharaoh was already resisting God. He was already treating the people of God with cruel brutality. So the hardening of Pharaoh's heart was an act of God's government, and it was deserved. It was not at all an arbitrary use of sovereignty. What is more, we find Pharaoh hardening his own heart again and again. Who can fault God for doing to him what he deliberately did for himself?

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

"To show you My power"

Egypt was the leading world power of its day, and its king met God's claim with defiance.

The king stood in proud defiance of the LORD. "Who is the LORD?" he said... But God was carrying on His purpose. He was showing that man at his best was a failing creature, and that when he received power and authority he used it against God. It was right that God should show man for what he is, and set him aside to make room for the only Man who is able to rule. For this reason God raised Pharaoh up, so that in him the power of the world would be set aside.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

"That My name may be proclaimed in all the earth"

God aimed at an audience far beyond Egypt, and the fame of it has lasted for thousands of years.

God knew the stubborn self-will and pride of this man. Working behind the scenes, He raised him up to a place where he could carry on the ill-treatment of His people, and even make it worse, and so bring things to a head. The hour was now ripe for God to deal with him, and to display His power in such a way that His name would be declared throughout all the earth. A scripture such as Joshua 2:8-11 bears witness that in those days the name of the Lord really was declared. And even in our day, 3,500 years later, the fame of it has not died away.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Sovereignty and the limits of our logic

Paul's line "the Scripture says to Pharaoh" is itself striking, since no Bible existed in Pharaoh's day — God spoke through Moses, and the record is God's own Word.

The words of Moses would die away as soon as they were spoken, and if there had been no record of them, God's words could not have been recalled; but being recorded, it can be said, "The Scripture says to Pharaoh." This claims for Scripture that it is the Word of God.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Israel deserved judgment as much as Egypt did. Why one received mercy and the other hardening was not a question of merit.

Both were wicked — Israel and Pharaoh. Simple righteousness would have condemned both. He has mercy on one, and hardens the other. This is sovereignty. He proves Himself not only righteous — the day of judgment will prove that — but proves Himself God. This matters for us all: without it none would be saved.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Holding both truths does not mean solving them.

We believe both statements — divine sovereignty and human responsibility — but we are not pretending to reconcile them in a logical way. Perhaps, as finite beings, we are never meant to do so in this world.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Spared. Pharaoh's life was in God's hands. God could have cut him off, but kept him alive on purpose.

- Raised. God set a stubborn man high, so that everyone could see his defiance and God's answer.

- Not corrupted. God never made him bad. The hardening was judgment on a man who kept refusing grace, and the responsibility stayed his.

- Displayed. God set aside the world's strongest kingdom, showing what man does with power and making room for the only Man fit to rule.

- Declared. God's name travelled far beyond Egypt, and 3,500 years later the fame of it has still not died away.

Exodus 9:17 · Darby

Dost thou still exalt thyself against my people, that thou wilt not let them go?

The plagues have already battered Egypt. Before the hail falls, God puts one charge to Pharaoh. The words name the real issue behind his refusal: self-exaltation against a people God calls His own.

Two Claimants, One People

The dispute did not start with this verse. It goes back to God's first demand, and to one word in it: "My".

The word to him was, "Let My people go …" So the Lord at once claimed the people as His. But for a century or two the Pharaohs of Egypt had regarded the people as theirs, and as their slaves. So from the outset the issue was joined. Jehovah claimed the people that Pharaoh regarded as his own. Which claimant would prevail? The issue could not be in doubt for one moment.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Target Behind the Target

Pharaoh thought he was holding down slaves. God counts it differently. The same principle later stopped a persecutor in his tracks.

We must take note of verse 17. In it we find an early example of a principle: God accepts what is done against His people as done against Himself. It came to light most clearly when these words stopped Saul of Tarsus: "Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?" … By exalting himself against the children of Israel, Pharaoh was exalting himself against God. So he was hurrying on to his doom.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Still Standing — and Why

One commentator puts a picture behind the words "exalting yourself". He also answers a question the verse raises: why is this man still alive at all?

A protest followed. The words should read like this: God had stretched out His hand, yet He had not cut Pharaoh off. He kept him alive, so that Pharaoh might be the means of magnifying God's Name — either by humbling himself, or by rejecting the divine warning. "You are still exalting yourself" — like a dam set to hold back the waters.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

God Speaks to His Creature

Moses does not flatter the king. The tone of the message tells Pharaoh — here called Meneptah — where he really stands.

But more. God tells him that his life was wholly in divine hands. He might cut him off, but He had not. Meneptah had known nothing at all about God, yet God controlled his destiny… No Pharaoh had ever been spoken to like this before, we may be sure. Courtiers might flatter and cringe before the king. Moses and Aaron did neither… This was the language of One who claimed to be above all. He had raised up Pharaoh, and He had absolute power over every living thing. It was the language of God, the one true God, speaking to His creature. And that creature was really a disobedient worm of the dust, though he might think of himself as an absolute ruler.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Hardening That Follows Refusal

The order of events matters here. God's hardening answers a testimony already refused; it does not cause the refusal.

God had dealt with Pharaoh graciously. He gave him chance after chance to agree to what He asked. Still Pharaoh hardened his heart, and showed his deep-seated hatred and hostility to God and His people. Now this proud enemy is to come under the judicial hardening of God… Unbelief never starts as the result of judicial hardening on God's part. But let there be no doubt that there is such a thing as hardening. Two errors are equally wrong. One says this hardening comes before God first gives His testimony to men. The other denies that God may righteously use His sovereign right and harden a man after he has refused that testimony.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Mercy Inside the Threat

The charge in verse 17 leads straight into a judgment. But the warning itself is an offer, and even the animals could be spared.

Pharaoh kept exalting himself against God's people, and so against God Himself. So God tells him that the next day He would send a very heavy hail, such as Egypt had never known before (v. 18). But God graciously warns him that animals left outside would be killed. Some of Pharaoh's servants feared the Word of the Lord and took the warning. Of course their animals were safe. Others had no respect for God's Word, and they suffered for it.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Claim. God's demand rests on ownership. Israel are His people, though Egypt had held them as its property for generations.

- Challenge. Pharaoh stands against that claim like a dam against a flood. The verse names his sin: self-exaltation, not just stubbornness.

- Identification. God takes what is aimed at His people as aimed at Himself — the same principle heard later in "Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?"

- Patience. Pharaoh still breathes only because God spared him. His life lay wholly in God's hands, and the hardening came only after he refused God's testimony.

- Outcome. Even the threat of hail held out shelter. Those who feared God's word kept their animals; those who despised it lost them.

Exodus 9:18 · Darby

Behold, to-morrow about this time I will cause it to rain a very grievous hail, such as hath not been in Egypt since its foundation until now.

God gives Pharaoh a full day's notice of the seventh plague. The hail will be worse than any Egypt has known since it became a nation. Why announce a judgment instead of just sending it? What is that one day for?

The pride that drew the storm

The threat follows a charge: Pharaoh is still setting himself up against God's people. One writer explains the line just before the hail is named:

Then came a rebuke. The words should be read like this: God had stretched out His hand, yet Pharaoh was not cut off. God spared him, so that either by humbling himself or by rejecting God's warning, he might be the means of making God's Name great. "You are still exalting yourself against my people" — like a dam holding back the waters.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Another writer draws out the reason Pharaoh is still alive — and the way Moses spoke to him.

And why was he preserved in life? It was to show him God's power, and that God's name might be declared throughout all the earth (15-16). Never before had a Pharaoh been so addressed, we may be sure. Courtiers might flatter and cringe before the king. Moses and Aaron did neither.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Judgment with a date on it

"About this time tomorrow" was not a vague threat. Pharaoh had watched this pattern play out before.

Moses had said "tomorrow" for the swarms of flies (8:23). The next day they came. He had said "tomorrow" for the cattle plague. The next day came, and the cattle plague appeared (9:5). He had said "tomorrow" for the hail (9:18). On the next day the Lord rained hail on the land. Each time, God sent the plague He had foretold. It did not delay a single day. Just one night came between the warning and the plague each time.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Power over the sky

God announced this storm before He sent it. What came showed how far His power reached.

The storm was terrifying. It thundered; it hailed; and the lightning fire ran along the ground. There was hail, and fire mixed with hail, such as no one had ever seen. The One who had power over the waters, the dust, and even over people's bodies had power over the air as well. The God of the Hebrews was almighty.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Mercy hidden inside the threat

The announcement is not only a sentence. It hands the Egyptians something to do about it.

God threatens a very heavy hail to fall on man and beast; it would kill everything left out in the open field... God dealt with Pharaoh in this way so that he might know Jehovah and His power. He also acted so that what Jehovah did would make His name known throughout the earth... It was loving and gracious advice God gave through Moses (verse 19). No doubt there were many Egyptians who believed and escaped. The unbelieving suffered. Divine mercy still lingered.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The warning split Pharaoh's own court in two. The dividing line was how each man treated God's word.

Some among Pharaoh's servants feared the Word of the Lord and took the warning to heart. Of course their animals were safe. Others had no respect for God's Word, and they suffered the consequences.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

A picture of a judgment still ahead

One writer points back to this storm when he describes a judgment yet to come.

The seventh plague in Egypt was one of "hail and fire," a tempest without parallel in the history of that most ancient of kingdoms (Ex. 9:18-25). The coming judgment announced in Revelation will be of a more terrible character, more ruinous and widespread.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The pattern God keeps

One writer finds the same order — warning first, judgment after — at the city of Sodom, where a man named Lot lived.

Before God judges He always warns; and have not you, my friend, had many a warning note falling on your ear? Look at the grace of God in this chapter. The angels find their way to Sodom. They are, if I may say so, evangelists to the house of Lot. They announce what is coming, and they point out a place of safety.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Pride — Pharaoh kept lifting himself up against God. God left him alive on purpose: to show His power and spread His name through all the earth.

- Notice — every "tomorrow" Moses announced arrived on time. One night stood between the warning and the storm.

- Shelter — the threat came with instructions for escape. Commentators call that real mercy: many Egyptians believed and escaped.

- Divide — the same word split Pharaoh's servants. Those who feared it kept their animals safe. Those who ignored it lost them.

- Preview — a storm without equal in Egypt's history points ahead to a judgment more terrible and more widespread.

Exodus 9:19 · Darby

And now send, [and] secure thy cattle, and all that thou hast in the field all the men and the cattle that are found in the field, and are not brought home -- on them the hail shall come down, and they shall die.

Egypt has already suffered six plagues, and now Moses announces a hailstorm worse than anything the land has known. Yet God tells Pharaoh how to keep his people and animals alive — so why does judgment come with an escape route?

A Warning That Is Itself Mercy

The instruction to bring livestock in from the field is not a taunt. It is help, offered to the very court that had been resisting God.

It was loving and gracious advice that God gave through Moses (verse 19). No doubt there were many Egyptians who believed and escaped. The unbelieving suffered. Divine mercy still lingered.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The same writer suggests where those believers ended up when Israel finally left Egypt:

Those Egyptians who believed the divine warning must have belonged to the mixed multitude that went out with Israel (chapter 12:38).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Human Life Now at Stake

This verse puts people in the same sentence as the animals. Until now, no plague had taken human life. The danger is real, but it turns on one thing: shelter.

It was the merciful One whose message Moses delivered. He would spare the lives of His creatures, even the least of the cattle, if only they were sheltered from the coming judgment. The hail touched no living creature that was housed (19-21). Up to now we have not read of human life taken by any of the plagues. Now there was that risk, but only if people despised or denied shelter (20-21).

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Two Responses in One Court

The warning went out to everyone in Pharaoh's household, and it split them. What divided them was not what they heard but what they did with it.

Some of the court believed and took the advice to house their cattle and their servants. Others despised the counsel and lost everything.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The Puzzle of the Surviving Cattle

An obvious difficulty sits in this verse. The fifth plague killed "all the livestock of the Egyptians" (verse 6) — so what animals are left to rescue here? Commentators differ. One looks again at that word "all":

The answer may be that the word "all" in verse 6 is not meant to be absolute, but is used in a general sense. Or else the Egyptians may have brought in other livestock after the fifth plague.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Another starts with the word for cattle, and then with where the animals were kept:

A word here about the cattle. We learn from 9:3, and also from Genesis 47:16-17, that the Hebrew word covered far more than people would suppose from the language we use today. We suggest the explanation may lie in a difference between two kinds of cattle. Some were left out in the field day and night. Others were housed at times in stalls or other places prepared for them. Exodus 9:3 mentions only cattle in the field, and says nothing about any refuge provided for them at the homesteads. Verse 19, however, shows that cattle could be kept in shelters — a difference that may throw light on the matter. The disease killed all the cattle turned out for grazing. The hail would strike any cattle that had shelters, if they were not brought back to them.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Hail as a Signature of God

Why hail, and not some other weapon? Because no one can mistake where it comes from. One writer, commenting on hail elsewhere in Scripture, looks back to this chapter:

Hail is a symbol of sharp, crushing judgment, sent straight from heaven. It comes so plainly from heaven that no one can put it down to anyone but God. We believe that history records storms of exceptional violence in which stones weighing a pound, or even a little more, fell with terrible effect, similar to what Exodus 9 records.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned. God announced the hail before it fell, and told Egypt how to survive it. Judgment came with an escape route.

- Sheltered. The escape was simple: bring what you value indoors. The hail touched nothing that was under a roof.

- Divided. One warning reached the whole court and split it. Some believed and housed their people and animals. Others despised the counsel and lost everything.

- Rescued. The Egyptians who believed escaped. Some may have been among the mixed multitude that later walked out of Egypt with Israel.

- Unmistakable. Hail falls from the sky, so no one can put it down to chance. That is why the warning before it was such mercy.

Exodus 9:20 · Darby

He that feared the word of Jehovah among the bondmen of Pharaoh made his bondmen and his cattle flee into the houses.

The hail was the seventh plague. God announced it a day ahead, and the announcement told people how to survive it. What happened next split Pharaoh's own court in two. Some of his officials acted on what God said. Others ignored it. The only difference between them was what each man did with a word he had heard.

Mercy inside the threat

Moses announced judgment. But the message also carried a way out. One writer finds the mercy of God in that offer, down to the care it takes over farm animals.

It was the merciful One whose message Moses delivered — One who would spare the lives of His creatures, even the lowliest of the cattle, if only they were sheltered from the coming judgment. The hail touched no living creature that was under shelter (19-21). Up to this point we have not read of human life taken by any of the plagues. Now there was that risk, but only if a man despised or refused shelter (20-21).

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Fear that moved

The verse does not say these men feared the hail. It says they feared the word. That fear showed itself in what they did: they moved their servants and animals indoors before the storm came.

Some among Pharaoh's servants feared the word of the Lord and heeded the warning. Of course their animals were safe. But others had no respect for God's word, and they suffered the consequences.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Witnesses inside Pharaoh's own palace

Pharaoh could not claim he did not know. The people closest to him kept telling him the truth. One writer strings together the moments when that happened. This verse is the second.

The Lord always acts for His own glory, for His own name. Yet the king of Egypt was responsible, and his own people and the surrounding nations were witnesses of it. First, the magicians told Pharaoh, "This is the finger of God" (Exodus 8:19). Second, in this verse, those among Pharaoh's servants who feared the word of the LORD hurried their slaves and their livestock into the houses (Exodus 9:20). Third, Pharaoh's servants said to him, "How long shall this man be a snare to us? Let the men go, that they may serve the LORD their God" (Exodus 10:7). This is evidence enough that the judgments were having their effect on people of every class.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Where did these men end up? Commentators can only infer. One suggests that some of them later walked out of Egypt with Israel.

No doubt there were many Egyptians who believed and escaped. The unbelieving suffered. Divine mercy was still lingering. Those Egyptians who believed the divine warning must have belonged to the mixed multitude that went out with Israel (chapter 12:38).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The question about the cattle

Readers often stop here with a question. An earlier plague killed the livestock of Egypt, so how were there any left to rescue? One writer faces it head on.

A difficulty may arise when we compare Exodus 9:6 with verse 19. If all the cattle died in the plague, what was left of them for the hail to endanger? We may be quite sure that Moses knew what he was writing... We would suggest here that the explanation may lie in a difference. Some cattle were left out in the field day and night. Others were housed at times in stalls or other places prepared for them. In verse 19 we learn that people could provide shelters for their cattle. The disease killed all the cattle turned out for grazing. The hail would attack any cattle that had shelters, if they were not brought back to them.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The point of a warning

Here God offers Egyptians a way out of a plague. One writer notes that a later plague came with no such offer.

Moses told Pharaoh and his princes about the blow that would fall on them. This time he did not offer any of them a chance of escaping it, as he had in the earlier plague of the hail.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The same pattern still holds. One writer applies it directly to the reader.

But we are warned so that we may escape. For there is a way of escape. "Whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life" (John 5:24).

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Word — God sent a word ahead of the hail; everything in this verse turns on what each man did with it.

- Fear — they feared the word itself, not just the weather. That fear moved servants and livestock indoors before any cloud appeared.

- Shelter — the hail touched nothing under a roof. The warning came with the remedy attached.

- Witness — the men who obeyed served in Pharaoh's own house. He had no excuse left.

- Escape — God warns so that people may escape. The warning does nothing for anyone who will not act on it.

Exodus 9:21 · Darby

But he that did not regard the word of Jehovah left his bondmen and his cattle in the field.

God warned Egypt before the hail fell. He named the danger and He named the way to survive it: bring people and livestock under cover. This verse records the men who heard that and left everything standing in the open.

A Warning With Something to Do

This plague came with a way out. The warning was more than a threat. It told people what to do to stay alive, and it was not only for the palace.

There was also something new for the Egyptians here. God gave a warning, so any of the common people who paid attention to the word of the Lord had the chance to act, and that action would save them from the worst of it. The hail storm was so violent that any person or animal left out in it would die.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

One Message, Two Responses

The same words reached the whole of Pharaoh's court. They did not get the same response.

Some of the court believed, and took the advice to bring their cattle and their servants under cover. Others despised the counsel, and lost everything.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Neglect Named as Unbelief

Leaving the servants and animals outside looks like carelessness. One writer gives it a sharper name.

The warning came in time. So the Egyptians could protect their cattle and their servants from the terrible storm that was coming. Some took the warning and did as God directed through Moses. Those who neglected the warning suffered the consequences of their unbelief.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The Cattle Already Killed

An earlier plague had already killed Egypt's cattle. So how could there be livestock left in the field for the hail to strike? One writer suggests an answer.

Some feel a difficulty when they compare Exodus 9:6 with verse 19. If all the cattle died of the disease, what was left of them to be put in danger by the hail? We suggest the explanation may lie in the difference between cattle left out in the field day and night, and cattle kept at times in stalls or other places prepared for them. The disease attacked and killed all the cattle turned out to graze. The hail would strike any cattle that had shelters, if they were not brought back to them.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Mercy Still Speaking Inside Judgment

The warning in verse 19 was advice, not just an ultimatum. One writer follows the Egyptians who took it beyond the storm.

It was loving and gracious advice that God gave through Moses (verse 19). No doubt there were many Egyptians who believed and escaped. The unbelieving suffered. Divine mercy still lingered. The Egyptians who believed God's warning must have belonged to the mixed multitude that went out with Israel.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The "mixed multitude" means the non-Israelites who walked out of Egypt with Israel.

Why Hail

The form of this judgment is not random. One writer links it to the contempt that brought it on.

If the earth away from God becomes a scene of corruption and ruin, heaven will frown on it too. In the plague of hail we see the result of despising God. Hail is rain chilled into ice. The very mercies of heaven, when despised, are changed into pitiless judgment.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Same Position Today

One writer sets Egypt's position beside ours. God has warned people now of a judgment still to come.

People today stand where the Egyptians stood before that fourteenth day of Nisan. They are warned of the coming judgment, so the way of escape is alike as well. The blood of the lamb alone brought deliverance then; the blood of God's Lamb brings deliverance now… And greater interests are at stake now than then. Losing your firstborn is a heavy blow. The everlasting ruin of your soul is a far more terrible disaster.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned. Before the hail, God named the danger and the one action that would save life. This was new in these plagues, and it was open to ordinary Egyptians, not just the palace.

- Divided. The same warning reached the whole court. Some believed it and brought their people in. Others despised the counsel and lost everything.

- Unbelief. What ruined them was not ignorance. They had the word and did nothing with it, and they suffered the consequences of their unbelief.

- Mercy. Even inside judgment God's mercy lingered. The Egyptians who believed escaped. They may well be among the mixed multitude who later walked out of Egypt with Israel.

- Today. Mercies despised turn into pitiless judgment; hail is only rain chilled into ice. People now stand warned as Egypt did. The shelter offered is the blood of God's Lamb, and the soul itself is at stake.

Exodus 9:22 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Stretch out thy hand toward the heavens, that there may be hail throughout the land of Egypt, upon men, and upon cattle, and upon every herb of the field in the land of Egypt.

Egypt has already felt God's hand in its river, its dust, its cattle and its people's bodies. Now God tells Moses to reach toward the sky. This time the blow falls from above. The command names what it will hit: man, beast and every plant. Three questions follow. Why from heaven? Why so total? And why announce it at all?

Heaven Turns Against the Earth

Judgment has already worked through the earth. Now it comes from above, and one writer shows the logic in that — what usually falls as blessing falls as ice.

If the earth away from God turns into a scene of corruption and desolation like this, heaven will also frown upon it. In the plague of hail we see the result of this despising of God. Hail is rain chilled into ice. The very mercies of heaven, once despised, turn into pitiless judgment.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Man and Beast

The command raises a well-known puzzle. Earlier in this chapter a disease killed Egypt's cattle. So what beasts remain for the hail to strike? One commentator refuses to treat this as a slip in the record.

We may be quite sure that Moses knew what he was writing. He would not commit a blunder that left his account in a contradiction an ordinary schoolboy could spot... We suggest here that the explanation may lie in a difference. Some cattle stayed out in the field day and night. Others had stalls or other places prepared for them... The disease attacked and killed all the cattle turned out for grazing. The hail would attack any cattle that had shelters, if they were not brought back to them.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The Rod in Moses' Hand

Moses' hand carries the rod that has run through the whole contest with Egypt. It began by swallowing the magicians' rods, and it reappears in plague after plague.

It first swallowed up the rods of Egypt. That showed no strength could stand before God's strength. It gave Egypt notice that it was hard to kick against the goads (Ex. 7:12). But Egypt would not learn that lesson. Then the rod brings the plagues of blood, of frogs, and of lice. At last the magicians admit that they could not measure their strength against the Lord's (Ex. 8:19). It is then used in the plagues of hail (Ex. 9:23), locusts (Ex. 10:13), and darkness (Ex. 10:22).

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Warned Before the Storm

God sends His warning before the storm arrives, and the warning doubles as instructions. Anyone who believed it could still get out from under it.

It was loving and gracious advice that God gave through Moses (verse 19). No doubt there were many Egyptians who believed and escaped. The unbelieving suffered. Divine mercy still lingered.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

That mercy reaches a long way down. The same message that threatens man and beast also offers to spare both.

The message Moses delivered came from the merciful One. He would spare the lives of His creatures, even the lowliest of the cattle, if only they were sheltered from the coming judgment. The hail touched no living creature that was under shelter (19-21). Up to this point we have not read of human life taken by any of the plagues. Now there was that risk, but only for those who despised or refused shelter (20-21).

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

"All the Land of Egypt" — and Not an Inch More

The command covers the whole country, yet the land where Israel lived stayed dry.

At its appointed time the storm burst. Fire and hail fell on the ground and destroyed trees and plants, and man and beast caught out in its violence. Only in Goshen, "the land of flowers," did nature smile. There the people heard the sound of the storm, but no wrath from heaven fell. The wall of partition separating Israel from Egypt rose right up to the sky.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Hail as a Standing Figure

Hail turns up again later in Scripture. One writer reads it as more than weather — a picture of judgment still ahead.

The hail is frozen drops of rain. Those gentle showers that water the earth so it may bring forth its fruit now turn into death-dealing wrath! For a Christ-rejecting world there is stored up "wrath against the day of wrath," of which the hail is a figure (Ex. 9:22; Hag. 2:17; Ps. 18:12; Rev. 16:21).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Heaven strikes. God has used the elements one by one. Now the sky, the usual source of rain, becomes the instrument of judgment.

- Heaven warns. God announces the blow before it falls. The warning is loving and gracious advice, not just a threat.

- Heaven shelters. The offer runs all the way down to the lowest animal: the hail touched nothing under cover.

- Heaven divides. The storm covered all Egypt, yet stopped at Goshen — a dividing wall that reached to the sky.

- Heaven forecasts. Hail appears again in Scripture as a figure of wrath still stored up. This day in Egypt is a preview, not a one-off.

Exodus 9:23 · Darby

And Moses stretched out his staff toward the heavens, and Jehovah gave thunder and hail; and the fire ran along the ground; and Jehovah rained hail on the land of Egypt.

Egypt's seventh plague breaks the moment the staff goes up. Thunder, hail, and fire fall together. Two questions run through the commentators here: who controls the sky, and why God announced this blow before He sent it.

Power over every element

Earlier plagues struck the water, the dust, and people's bodies. This one struck the air.

It thundered; it hailed; and the lightning fire ran along the ground. There was hail, and fire mixed with hail, such as no one had ever seen. He who had power over the waters, the dust, and even over people's bodies, had power over the air as well. The God of the Hebrews was all-powerful. Man and beast must bow under His hand.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Rain turned to hail

One writer sets this plague in a sequence. The ground was already corrupted; now the sky turns against Egypt too.

If the earth away from God is turned into a scene of corruption and ruin, then heaven will frown on it too. In the plague of hail we see the result of this despising of God. Hail is rain chilled into ice. Despise the mercies of heaven, and they turn into pitiless judgment.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Thunder as the voice of God

The Hebrew behind "thunder" is not only a weather word. It names the storm after God Himself.

The terrible hail came with thunder and with fire (lightning) that ran along the ground. In Hebrew these are called "the voices of God." The storm is a picture of God's wrath in judgment. Revelation mentions hail again and again, and calls it "the plague of hail" (Rev. 8:7, 11:19, 16:21).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The warning, and who took it

God warned Egypt before Moses lifted the staff. The gap between the threat and the storm was itself a kindness.

The advice God gave through Moses was loving and gracious (verse 19). No doubt many Egyptians believed and escaped. The unbelieving suffered. God's mercy still lingered. The Egyptians who believed His warning must have been part of the mixed crowd that went out with Israel (chapter 12:38).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The shelter covered animals as well as people, and it worked without exception.

The message Moses delivered came from the merciful One. He would spare the lives of His creatures, even the lowliest of the cattle, if only they had shelter from the coming blow. Not one living creature under cover was touched by the hail. Until now we have not read of any human life taken by the plagues. Now that risk was there, but only if shelter was despised or refused.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The line drawn at Goshen

The storm covered the whole land, yet it stopped at a border. Israel heard it without feeling it.

At its appointed time the storm burst. Fire and hail fell on the ground. The storm destroyed the trees and plants, and the people and animals caught out in its violence. Only in Goshen, "the land of flowers," nature smiled. There, though the sound of the storm was heard, no wrath from heaven fell. The wall of partition separating Israel from Egypt rose right up to the sky.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

What the sudden stop proved

Pharaoh's fright produced words of repentance. Moses saw through them, yet still prayed — and the way the storm ended said as much as the way it began.

Moses, however, was not fooled by this fresh show of repentance and piety. He told Pharaoh outright that he knew he would not keep his promise. Yet he went out and prayed for him, spreading his hands out to the Lord, and the storm stopped as suddenly as it began. In how it started and in how it ended, it proved itself to be an act of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The pattern borrowed later

One writer reads the first trumpet of Revelation against this scene. He treats its hail and fire as figures drawn from Egypt.

Elsewhere hail is a symbol of sweeping desolation… Fire is another well-known symbol of judgment. The plagues of Egypt supply many of these figures, and there the two come together: "the LORD sent thunder and hail, and fire ran down to the earth." In Revelation the hail and fire are "mingled with blood," showing that the judgments they stand for destroy life.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Summary

- Warning. God announced the blow through Moses before He sent it, so no one in Egypt was struck unwarned.

- Shelter. Anyone who believed the word brought servants and cattle inside. Nothing under cover was struck.

- Storm. Rain chilled into ice. Heaven's ordinary kindness became judgment on a land that despised God.

- Separation. Goshen heard the thunder but felt nothing; the dividing line between Israel and Egypt ran up to the sky.

- Shadow. The storm began and stopped at God's word, and Revelation's trumpets pick up its imagery again.

Exodus 9:24 · Darby

And there was hail, and fire mingled with the hail, very grievous, such as there had been none like it in all the land of Egypt since it became a nation.

A storm of hail with fire flashing inside it hit Egypt — worse than anything in its history. Three questions follow: what was God showing by taking hold of the sky, why warn Pharaoh first, and why did the blow leave him unchanged?

The voices of God

The fire in this storm was lightning. The noise that came with it carried a name of its own.

With the terrible hail came fire (lightning) that ran along the ground, and thunder. The Hebrew calls these "the voices of God." The storm is a picture of God's wrath in judgment. Revelation mentions hail again and again, and calls it "the plague of hail" (Rev. 8:7, 11:19, 16:21).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Power over the sky itself

God had already shown His power over the water, the dust, and people's own bodies. The sky was what remained. Even at its worst, this storm stopped short of total ruin.

He who had power over the waters, the dust, and even over people's bodies, had power over the air as well. The God of the Hebrews was all-powerful. Man and beast must bow under His hand. "The hail struck down everything that was in the field in all the land of Egypt, both man and beast. And the hail struck down every plant of the field and broke every tree of the field" (9:25). The land had never known such a storm before, and nothing since has matched it. Yet God showed mercy. The hail struck the flax and the barley — those crops, we conclude, were ruined for that year — but the wheat and the rye escaped, because they had not yet come up. So these crops would give food for the year. The note about the crops tells us the season when the hail came — the early spring — for the barley had formed ears and the flax was in bloom.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

An open door before the storm

God announced this blow a day ahead and told Egypt how to escape it. Commentators call that warning an act of kindness.

The advice God gave through Moses was loving and gracious (verse 19). No doubt many Egyptians believed and escaped. Those who did not believe suffered. God's mercy still lingered. The Egyptians who believed His warning must have belonged to the mixed crowd that went out with Israel (chapter 12:38).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Up to this point no plague had cost a human life. The shelter God named covered animals as well as people.

The message Moses delivered came from the merciful One. He would spare the lives of His creatures, even the lowest of the cattle, if only they had shelter from the coming judgment. The hail touched no living creature that was under cover (19-21). Until now we have not read of any plague taking a human life. Now that risk was real, but only if someone scorned the shelter or withheld it (20-21).

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

A line drawn across the sky

Israel lived in Goshen, and the storm stopped at its border.

At its appointed time the storm burst. Fire and hail fell on the ground. The storm destroyed trees and plants, and the people and animals left out in its fury. Only in Goshen, "the land of flowers," nature smiled. There the sound of the storm reached them, but no wrath from heaven fell. The wall that separated Israel from Egypt rose right up to the sky.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Confession without repentance

Pharaoh admitted his sin and asked for the thunder to stop — then went back on every word once it did.

The king staggered under the blow and again begged for relief. He even confessed that he had sinned and that the Lord was righteous. Once more he promised to let the people go, if only there would be no more mighty thunder and hail. (Ex. 9:27-28.) This brings Pharaoh's sin to light. He sees his guilt and admits it, yet he keeps on in his evil course — his open war against the Lord.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A small sample of a larger day

The record was not left for Egypt alone. One writer sees in these blows a preview of a far wider judgment.

This witness stands even in our own day, and people will remember it until the day of grace gives way to the age of judgment. Then God will act in righteous judgment and wrath, not with Egypt only but with the whole earth, as Revelation 6 - 11, 15, 16 pictures. Of that coming day of judgment the plagues of Egypt were a small sample.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned — God gave a full day's notice and named the way out. The storm came, but not by surprise.

- Sheltered — every person and animal under a roof lived. The loss fell where people ignored the warning.

- Separated — Goshen heard the storm but felt nothing. The line between Israel and Egypt rose right up to the sky.

- Spared — the later crops still stood after the worst storm Egypt had seen, so the year would still have food.

- Sample — the fire and thunder bear the name "the voices of God." The whole plague is a small sample of the judgment Revelation describes for the whole earth.

Exodus 9:25 · Darby

And the hail smote throughout the land of Egypt all that was in the field, both men and cattle; and the hail smote every herb of the field, and broke every tree of the field.

The seventh plague ends with a damage report. Two questions follow from it. How complete was the ruin, and who came through it standing?

Scale of the Storm

One writer notes that God's power now reached the sky, and Egypt had no record of such a storm.

It thundered; it hailed; and the lightning fire ran along the ground. There was hail, and fire mixed with hail, and no one had ever seen anything like it. He who had power over the waters, the dust, and even over people's bodies, had power over the sky as well. The God of the Hebrews was all-powerful. Man and beast must bow under His hand... The land had never known such a storm before, and nothing since has matched it.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why Plants and Trees

The verse does not simply list property damage. What the hail struck was the ordinary food supply of both people and animals.

Hail is the symbol of wrath (Ex. 9:18–33; Ex. 10:5–15; Ps. 78:47; Ps. 105:32; Ps. 148:8; Isa. 28:2, 17; Hag. 2:17)... Trees and grass are the simplest and most natural means of life for man and beast: for trees see Gen. 1:29; Gen. 2:9; Deut. 20:19; for grass, Gen. 1:11-12; Deut. 11:15; Ps. 104:14 and Ps. 106:20.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Kindness Turned to Judgment

One writer starts from what hail is made of.

Hail is rain chilled into ice. The very mercies of heaven despised are changed into pitiless judgment (Ex. 9:13, etc.).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer follows the same thought, and names the one thing the storm did not subdue.

The hail does not speak of God simply withdrawing. It speaks of that withdrawal becoming a pitiless storm of judgment, and it subdues everything — except, sadly, the heart of man. His pain admits the power that is making him suffer, yet his heart stays hard and unrepentant. So that heart becomes the witness to the wrath it has brought down on itself, and the proof that the wrath is just.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Limits Set by God

The next two verses put limits on the word "every." They also fix the time of year.

The hail wrecked the crops and destroyed even the trees of the field. Verses 31 and 32 tell us exactly what was growing, and that shows us the time of year. It must have been late February or early March. In Egypt at that time the barley has formed its ears and the flax is in blossom, but the wheat and the rye are not yet standing in the stalk.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Stuart draws mercy out of the same detail.

Yet mercy was shown. The hail struck the flax and the barley — those crops, we conclude, were spoiled for that year — but the wheat and the rye were unharmed, because they had not yet come up. So these crops would still give food for the year.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Goshen Untouched

"All the land of Egypt" stopped at a border. One writer describes what that line meant for Israel.

At the appointed time the storm burst. Fire and hail fell on the ground. It destroyed trees and plants, and every person and animal left out in its violence. Only in Goshen, "the land of flowers," did nature smile. The people there heard the sound of the storm, but no wrath from heaven fell. The wall that separated Israel from Egypt rose right up to the sky.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Who Was Caught Outside

The hail struck what was left in the field. Egypt had a day's warning, and some people acted on it.

But God kindly warned Pharaoh that animals left outside would be killed. Some of Pharaoh's servants feared the Word of the Lord and took the warning, and of course their animals were safe. Others had no respect for God's Word, and they suffered the consequences.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

After the Hail Stopped

The storm moved Pharaoh, but the change did not last.

Note Pharaoh's confession, which shows that this plague had made a deep impression on him (verse 27). Pharaoh used the name of "Jehovah" and the name of God (Elohim). "Entreat Jehovah that there be no more voices of God" (literal rendering). What a desperately wicked thing the human heart is. He sinned more after this than before.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Warning — the ruin fell only on what was left in the open. God gave a day's notice, so anyone who feared His word could take shelter.

- Wrath — hail is rain frozen to ice. Heaven's kindness, once despised, comes back as judgment.

- Reach — the storm claimed the herbs and trees, the plain means of life for people and animals alike.

- Restraint — the wheat and rye had not come up yet, so a harvest survived. Goshen never felt a stone.

- Result — the hail subdued the whole land, but not one heart. Pharaoh confessed, then sinned worse than before.

Exodus 9:26 · Darby

Only in the land of Goshen, where the children of Israel were, was there no hail.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Exodus 9:27 · Darby

And Pharaoh sent, and called Moses and Aaron, and said to them, I have sinned this time Jehovah is the righteous [one], but I and my people are the wicked [ones].

The thunder and hail have crushed Egypt, and Pharaoh sends for Moses and Aaron to admit that he has sinned. His words are true, yet the chapter ends with him as hard as ever — which raises the question of what a confession is worth.

The confession under the storm

Every word Pharaoh said was true. What was missing was intent:

This terrible blow so alarmed Pharaoh that he called for Moses and Aaron (v. 27). He told them, "This time I have sinned," and admitted that the Lord is righteous and that he and his people are wicked. He need not have said this at all, though it was true. But he should have meant it when he promised to let Israel go if God stopped the plague (v. 28).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The confession came wrapped in a bargain, and Moses saw through it:

The blow was so terrible that it frightened Pharaoh. As verse 27 shows, he was ready to make some confession of wrongdoing, and to promise to let the people go, if only this dreadful scourge would stop. Moses, however, was not deceived by this fresh profession of repentance and piety.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Guilt admitted, course unchanged

Pharaoh is not an ignorant man who needs information. He states his own guilt and keeps going:

So the wickedness of Pharaoh is brought to light. He sees and admits his guilt, and yet keeps on in his evil course — his open hostility to the Lord. Despite his confession, as soon as the Lord answered Moses' plea, he went back to his hardened ways.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Same words, different endings

Two lists run through Scripture, and the same sentence stands at the head of both:

Many people in Scripture take the place of saying, "I have sinned." It is very striking that not all of them get cleansing. David (2 Samuel 12:13), Nehemiah (Nehemiah 9:33), Job (Job 40:4; 42:6), Isaiah (Isaiah 6:5; 64:6), Jeremiah (Jeremiah 14:7, 20), Daniel (Daniel 9:5), Micah (Micah 7:9), the prodigal son (Luke 15:21), and the thief on the cross (Luke 23:41) all took the place of sinners. They all got cleansing or blessing. But look at Pharaoh (Exodus 9:27; 10:16), Balaam (Numbers 22:34), Achan (Joshua 7:20), Saul (1 Samuel 15:24; 26:21), Shimei (2 Samuel 19:20), and Judas (Matthew 27:4). These all confess they have sinned, yet they perish… There was no hatred of the sin. There was no desire to turn from it and give it up.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Take one name from each list, and the difference shows:

Others have said the same, but to no purpose. God reads the heart, and He knows a person's motive. Pharaoh could say, "This time I have sinned" (Ex. 9:27), when the thunder and hail alarmed him and he wanted them gone. Yet he had not repented. He sinned still more and hardened his heart once the mighty thunderings had stopped. He confessed the same a second time, when the locusts had destroyed every plant the hail had spared. But his only aim was to get rid of that plague (Ex. 10:16-17)… David's case was very different. He was not thinking of his standing before other people, or how to save it. He saw and confessed what his guilt was before God.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Confessing without forsaking

The test is not the admission but what happens to the sin afterwards:

Pharaoh is the classic example of the sinner who defies God, yet is quite ready to act humble if that helps him escape the punishment he deserves. We must remember this word: "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy" (Prov. 28:13). Under chastisement Pharaoh did not mind doing a little bit of confessing, but he had no idea of forsaking his self-willed way.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The mercy that hardened him

Pharaoh's heart grew harder not only under the blow but under the relief he begged for:

When each blow stops, it shows that God is willing to withdraw His hand from judgment, and that judgment is strange work to Him. Pharaoh hardens his heart not only by refusing to bow under the plagues. He hardens it by keeping on in his course after God answered his cry and lifted the plague. So neither God's severity in sending the plague, nor His goodness in lifting it, has any effect on a man whose heart is set on doing evil.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Alarm. The storm frightened Pharaoh into speech; the confession came out of the hail, not out of his heart.

- Accurate. Every word he said was true, which is why true words alone prove nothing about a man's heart.

- Motive. He wanted the thunder stopped, not his sin dealt with — and Moses was not deceived.

- Test. The line runs between confessing and forsaking. The same three words brought David and the thief blessing, but left Pharaoh, Saul and Judas where they were.

- Aftermath. When the relief came, the heart hardened again — so neither God's blow nor God's kindness moves a will fixed on evil.

Exodus 9:28 · Darby

Intreat Jehovah that it may be enough, that there be no more thunder of God and hail; and I will let you go, and ye shall stay no longer!

Hail and fire have broken Egypt, and Pharaoh begs Moses and Aaron to stop the storm — offering again the release he has already promised and taken back. It sounds like surrender, but can a man admit his sin, call God righteous, and stay unchanged?

The sound he was begging to escape

The thunder Pharaoh wanted silenced has a name in the Hebrew text.

The terrible hail came with fire (lightning) that ran along the ground, and with thunder. Hebrew calls these "the voices of God." The storm is a picture of God's wrath in judgment. Revelation mentions hail again and again, calling it "the plague of hail" (Rev. 8:7, 11:19, 16:21). The plagues of Egypt will come again on this earth during the great tribulation. Pharaoh used the name "Jehovah" and the name of God (Elohim). "Plead with Jehovah that there be no more voices of God" (literal rendering). What a desperately wicked thing the human heart is. He sinned more after this than before.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A true statement that was not repentance

Pharaoh said the right words. God still read his heart.

Others have said the same thing, yet to no purpose; for God reads the heart, and He knows the motive of the creature. Pharaoh could say, "I have sinned this time" (Ex. 9:27). He was alarmed by the thunder and hail and wanted them removed. Yet he had not repented: once the mighty thunderings had stopped, he sinned still more and hardened his heart.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The promise he was never required to make

Nobody made Pharaoh say any of this.

This terrible affliction alarmed Pharaoh so much that he called for Moses and Aaron (v. 27). He told them, "I have sinned this time," and admitted that the Lord is righteous and that he and his people are wicked. He need not have said this at all, though it was true. But he should have meant it when he promised to let Israel go if the plague stopped (v. 28).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Writers describe the same split in the man: guilt openly owned, and the course of life unchanged.

He even confessed that he had sinned, and that the Lord was righteous, and once more promised that he would let the people go, provided there might be no more mighty thunderings and hail. (Ex. 9:27-28.) The iniquity of Pharaoh is thus brought to light. He sees and admits his guilt, and yet keeps on in his evil course — his open opposition to the Lord.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Moses prayed, knowing the promise was worthless

The request "plead with the LORD" was granted, though the man making it had already been told he would not keep his word.

Moses, however, was not deceived by this fresh show of repentance and piety. He told him plainly that he knew he would not keep his promise. Yet he went out as an intercessor and spread his hands out to the Lord, and the plague stopped as suddenly as it had begun. Both in its coming and in its stopping it proved itself to be an act of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why would God answer a plea He knows is hollow?

It is beautiful to notice God's tender ways of grace, even with a hardened sinner. If there is even the slightest turning of heart to Him, He is ready to hear — even though He knows the turning is not real. That is a striking testimony that He does not want the sinner to die.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why terror alone never converts anyone

Pharaoh's cry was aimed at the hail, not at his heart.

I appeal to experience. Does a person who looks back at his own mind not know that he came to an inward state of hatred of sin, self-judgment and confession of sins, with humbling and self-loathing? In a word, was repentance not produced in his soul? It may have come through the terrors of the law, with fear and dread; yet, if real, it always came with some drawing to God as good, some love of holiness, some sense of responsibility in grace whatever the terror. For mere terror of consequences is not repentance at all.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the lull in the storm exposes

Relief is the real test, and not for Pharaoh only.

When sober, man has to admit that God's judgment on him is just. But that does not make him love God. On the contrary, it hardens his heart... And when relief comes, if the patience of God has prolonged the day of salvation, it only finds the sinner's heart harder and further from God. "Because the sentence against an evil deed is not executed speedily, the heart of the children of man is fully set to do evil." (Ecc. 8:11.)

Modernised from William J LoweOriginal wording

Summary

- Voices. Hebrew calls the thunder "the voices of God." Pharaoh asked for God's voice to stop.

- Confession. Every word he said was true. But God reads the heart, and fear is not repentance.

- Bargain. Nobody asked Pharaoh for this promise. He offered it himself, so he should have meant it.

- Answer. Moses prayed for him anyway, and God heard. He does not want the sinner to die.

- Relief. The storm stopped, and that was the real test. A heart that only feared punishment came out harder than the hail found it.

Exodus 9:29 · Darby

And Moses said to him, When I go out of the city, I will spread out my hands to Jehovah the thunder will cease, and there will be no more hail; that thou mayest know that the earth is Jehovah's.

Pharaoh has just admitted his guilt and begged for the thunder and hail to stop. Moses answers with a promise and a reason. He will pray, the storm will end — and the king will learn who owns the land he rules.

Praying for a man he knew would break his word

Moses agrees to pray, even though he has just told the king he will not keep his word:

The plague was so terrifying that Pharaoh took fright. He was ready to make some confession of wrongdoing, as verse 27 shows, and to promise to let the people go, if only this dreadful scourge might stop. Moses, however, was not fooled by this fresh show of repentance and piety. He told him he knew he would not keep his promise. Yet he went out to pray for him and spread his hands out to the Lord. The plague stopped as suddenly as it had begun. Both in its start and in its ending, it proved itself to be an act of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A storm that stops the moment a man lifts his hands is no accident of weather.

Out of the city first

Moses does not only say he will pray. He says where — outside the city walls:

He went so far, in the power of his God, that he would not even pray inside the walls of the idol-worshipping city. He lifted up his hands only once he was outside it, and at once the storm stopped. Then, just as had been foretold, Pharaoh and his court hardened their hearts.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The earth belongs to the Lord

Egypt treated the powers of nature as gods. One writer quotes this summary of what the plagues proved:

The plagues of Egypt are built on the natural features Egypt already has. So what makes them unheard of and extraordinary is not so much the plagues themselves. It is their force, their reach, and how fast they follow one another the moment Moses gives the command. They are therefore both natural and supernatural. That leaves both faith and unbelief free to choose — and in Pharaoh, unbelief won. They are also fitted to convince the Egyptians that Jehovah is not just the national God of the Israelites. He is a God above all gods, and He holds in His hand all the powers of nature too — the powers Egypt was used to treating as gods.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Israel's God is not one local god bargaining with another. The ground under Pharaoh's throne belongs to Him.

Known in grace, or known in judgment

Pharaoh had said at the start that he did not know the Lord. One writer traces where that refusal leaves him:

Pharaoh said he did not know the Lord, but Pharaoh must know Him (Ex. 5:2; Ex. 9:14). If Pharaoh would disown Him in goodness, he must know Him in righteousness. He was now about to show His judgments openly, and "the Lord is known by the judgment He carries out."

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Knowledge that changes nothing

The storm stopped, exactly as Moses had promised. Then Pharaoh's heart closed again:

He sees and admits his guilt, and yet keeps on in his evil course — his open opposition to the Lord. Despite his confession, the moment the Lord answered the prayer of Moses, he went back to his hardened ways. None of this surprised God. He lifted His hand at the prayer of Moses on behalf of the Egyptian king. God is never impatient, even in the face of open rebellion. He waits for His own time, bearing with the wickedness of men in patience and grace.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The end God is working toward

The verse looks past Egypt. One writer, pointing to this verse among others, shows where all of this leads:

The Lord gains glory out of the violence and wickedness of man (Ex. 9:14, 16, 29). Then He overrules it all. In the end He gathers around Himself a happy and worshipping people, and holds the whole earth in godly subjection to His sceptre as King of kings.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Confession. Pharaoh admits his sin under pressure. A confession that only wants the pain to stop leaves the heart unchanged.

- Intercession. Moses prays for a man he has already said will break his word. He prays outside the city, clear of its idols.

- Cessation. The storm's sudden stop, like its start, marks it out as God's own act.

- Knowledge. God's aim throughout is that Pharaoh should know Him. Refuse to know Him in goodness, and you will know Him in judgment.

- Ownership. The powers Egypt worshipped are in one hand. God is working toward the day when the whole earth bows to Him.

Exodus 9:30 · Darby

But as to thee and thy bondmen, I know that ye do not yet fear Jehovah Elohim.

Pharaoh has just admitted his sin. Moses answers with a blunt verdict: the king and his officials still do not fear God. Here the plague story draws the line between being frightened and being changed.

What "fear the LORD God" Means Here

Moses does not doubt that Pharaoh is shaken. The hail and thunder drove the king to call the storm the voice of God and to send for the man he had defied. What Moses denies is that any of this is yet fear of God. One writer sets the scene, with Moses turning his eyes from the king to the officials standing around him. He uses an older translation, where "the LORD God" reads "Jehovah Elohim":

Pharaoh said the strange thunderings were the very "voices of God." He shrank back, and asked Moses to pray for him. He admitted he had sinned — an astounding descent from his throne of pride. Moses promised deliverance, but added, "As for you" — and we may well imagine him looking round at the court — "and your servants, I know that you will not yet fear Jehovah Elohim." He is the Sole and Only and Everlasting One, the Maker of All!

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Confession Without Repentance

Pharaoh had said the right words. He admitted his sin. But the words settled nothing, because God looks at the motive behind them. One writer measures this confession by what came after it:

Others have said "I have sinned" too, and it came to nothing; for God reads the heart, and He knows the motive of the creature. Pharaoh could say, "This time I have sinned," when the thunder and hail alarmed him and he wanted them stopped. Yet he had not repented. Once the mighty thunderings had ceased, he sinned still more and hardened his heart.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Not Deceived — and Praying Anyway

What Moses does next is the surprise. He says the promise will fail, then goes out and prays for the man who will break it.

Moses, however, was not deceived by this fresh claim of repentance and piety. He told the king straight out that he knew he would not keep his promise. Yet he went out as an intercessor and spread his hands out to the Lord. The visitation stopped as suddenly as it had begun. Both in its coming and in its going, it proved itself to be an act of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

That pattern runs right through God's dealings with this king. God answers the plea even when it is hollow:

It is beautiful to notice God's tender ways of grace, even with a hardened sinner. If there is the slightest turning of heart towards Him, He is ready to hear — even though He knows it is not real. This is a striking testimony that He does not want the sinner to die. Indeed, He does not wish that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance. (2 Peter 3:9.)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Prediction Proved True

Moses said "not yet," and what follows proves him right. The very mercy he prayed for gave Pharaoh his chance to go back on his word.

The seventh plague (Ex. 9:13-35) was hail with thunder and consuming fire. It drew from Pharaoh the confession of his sin and a promise to let the people go. He broke that promise as soon as Jehovah heard the intercession of Moses.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Known in Goodness, or Known in Judgment

Pharaoh's first words in this whole contest were that he did not know the Lord. Moses now tells him he still does not fear Him. One writer shows where that leaves him:

Pharaoh said he did not know the Lord, but Pharaoh must know Him (Ex. 5:2; Ex. 9:14). If Pharaoh would disown Him in goodness, he must know Him in righteousness. He was now about to make His judgments plain, and "the LORD is known by the judgment He executes." As His holy prophet says to Him, "When Your judgments are in the earth, the inhabitants of the world learn righteousness." God would have Egypt know Him in grace. But if Egypt refuses that lesson, she must know Him in the uplifted hand of power.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Known — Pharaoh's opening boast was that he did not know the Lord; Moses' verdict here is that he still does not fear Him. Nothing had changed.

- Frightened — He owned his sin. But God reads motive, not wording. His aim was to stop the storm, not to stop sinning.

- Seen through — Moses was not taken in. He said in advance that Pharaoh would break his promise, and Pharaoh broke it as soon as the hail stopped.

- Answered anyway — Moses prayed all the same, and the plague stopped. God hears the faintest turning of heart, even when He knows it is not real.

- Either way — God makes Himself known. Refuse to know Him in goodness, and you will know Him in righteousness. Fear that comes only from the hail is not yet the fear of the Lord.

Exodus 9:31 · Darby

And the flax and the barley were smitten; for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled.

The account of the seventh plague pauses for a farmer's note: which crops the hail destroyed, and which it missed. It looks like a small detail. Commentators read it as a date-stamp on the whole story, and as a window into how God measures His judgments.

Why barley fell and wheat did not

The verse turns on the growing season. Barley and flax were already far along; wheat was still underground. The same pattern held in Canaan — in the weeks that would later open Israel's year.

Barley ripened early, well ahead of wheat, in Canaan as in Egypt (Ex. 9:31-32). In the sheltered valleys of Bethlehem, barley would usually be ripe and ready for the reaper in the first weeks of Nisan (March–April), the month that was made the first month of the sacred year for the new-born nation of Israel (see Ex. 12:2).

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

Dating the storm

Because crops ripen on a fixed calendar, the state of the fields tells us when the storm fell. "In the ear" means the barley had already headed; the older word "bolled" for the flax means it was in flower.

Verses 31 and 32 give clear information. It shows us that the time of year must have been late February or early March. In Egypt at that season the barley is in the ear and the flax in blossom (or, bolled), while the wheat and the rye are not yet in the stalk.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Commentators differ on the exact month, but not on the method. Another writer sets it a few weeks earlier and points out how close the deliverance now was.

Because the flax and barley crops are named, we can fix the date of this plague. It was late in January or early in February. The end was near. There were only four weeks more, and Israel would be free.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

What the loss cost Egypt

Of everything the hail flattened, the flax was the costliest loss. Yet the blow changed nothing in the king.

Under this seventh plague Egypt must have lost nearly all its glory and been brought very low. Most of its livestock was destroyed, its trees broken, its barley and flax ruined — and the flax was a very valuable crop. But as soon as the punishment stopped, Pharaoh went back to his stubborn defiance, and so did his servants. All this should press home on our hearts that what is born of the flesh is still flesh, no matter how it is treated, and that the mind of the flesh is enmity against God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Mercy inside the storm

The hail took the crops that were ripe and left the ones still under the ground. So the loss, huge as it was, had a limit.

Yet mercy was shown. The flax and the barley were struck — those crops, we conclude, were spoiled for that year — but the wheat and the rye were unharmed, because they had not yet come up. So there would still be food for the year from these crops. This note about the crops shows the season when the hail came — the early spring — for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled, that is, in bloom.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

What the hail left standing

The wheat's escape was a reprieve, not an exemption. When Pharaoh kept refusing, the next plague targeted the very crops the hail had missed.

Even in those days people knew locusts as a serious plague, and the warning made plain how much worse this one would be: it would destroy all that was left in the land. The wheat and rye escaped before, but they would not escape this. The trees of the field had been broken by the hail, yet they were still in leaf; now they would be stripped bare. Only one way of escape was named: Pharaoh must humble himself before the Lord and let Israel go.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Ripeness — the hail took the barley and flax because they had already headed and flowered. The wheat lived because it had not yet come up.

- Clock — those crop stages date the storm to the early part of the year. Writers place it between late January and early March. Israel's freedom was only weeks away.

- Cost — Egypt lost its livestock, its trees, its barley and its valuable flax, and its glory with them. Yet Pharaoh hardened again the moment the sky cleared.

- Restraint — the later crops stood untouched, so food would still come that year. The judgment fell hard, but not to the last grain.

- Limit — the locusts came to finish what the hail spared. One way out remained: humble yourself before the Lord and let the people go.

Exodus 9:32 · Darby

But the wheat and the spelt were not smitten; for they were not come out into ear.

After the hail flattened Egypt, the account stops for a farmer's note: the later grain was still underground, so the storm missed it. That small detail tells us when the plague fell and how far God let it go.

Crops That Date the Plague

The two ruined crops and the two spared ones work like a calendar. One writer reads the timing from the state of the fields:

Verses 31 and 32 give clear information. It shows us that the time of year must have been late February or early March. That is when the barley in Egypt is in the ear and the flax in blossom, while the wheat and the rye are not yet in the stalk.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Another writer places it a few weeks earlier. Commentators differ on the month, but both read the season from the crops — and that season shows how close the end was:

The account names the flax and barley crops, so we can fix the date of this judgment. It was late in January or early in February. The end was near. There were only four weeks more, and Israel would be free.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

A Detail Only Egypt Could Supply

One writer points to details like this when answering critics who denied that Moses wrote the first five books of the Bible:

A number of words used here have their roots in the Egyptian language, not Hebrew. There are also references to Egyptian customs and geographical details that only people familiar with Egypt would know, and they come in without one word of explanation... The unbelieving "Higher Critics" insisted that Moses never wrote the Pentateuch. They said it was the work of Ezra, or of someone else about his time — a "pious fraud"... But Ezra, or anyone else coming from Babylon, would never have had this close knowledge of Egyptian words and customs from a thousand years before. And if he had obtained that knowledge by some miracle, he would have had to add explanations to make it clear to the readers of his day.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Mercy Left in the Ground

The storm struck every plant and broke every tree. Even so, it stopped short of starving the country. (Older translations call the second spared grain "rye"; the ESV calls it "emmer".)

The land had never known such a storm before, and nothing since has equalled it. Yet mercy showed itself. The hail struck the flax and the barley — those crops, we conclude, were spoiled for that year. But the wheat and the rye came through unharmed, because they had not sprung up. So these crops would give food for the year.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Heaven's Gift Turned Against the Land

Hail is not a foreign weapon. It is the rain a farmer prays for, arriving in a form that destroys him:

If the earth away from God is turned into a scene of corruption and ruin, heaven will frown on it too. In the plague of hail we see the result of this despising of God. Hail is rain chilled into ice. The very mercies of heaven, when despised, become pitiless judgment.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Reprieve Runs Out

The spared wheat was not a promise. It was a stay of execution, and the next plague would finish what the hail began:

Even in those days people knew locusts as a serious plague. The warning made plain that what was coming would be worse still: it would destroy all that was left in the land. The wheat and rye escaped before, but they would not escape this. The hail had broken the trees of the field, yet they were still in leaf; now they would be stripped bare. Only one way of escape was open: Pharaoh must humble himself before the Lord and let Israel go.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Heart Unchanged by Either

Egypt lost its wealth and still kept a harvest to live on. The king's answer to both was the same:

Under this seventh plague Egypt must have lost nearly all its glory and sunk very low. Most of its livestock destroyed, its trees broken, barley and flax ruined — and flax in particular was a very valuable crop. But as soon as the punishment stopped, Pharaoh went back to his stubborn defiance, and so did his servants. How all this should drive home into our hearts that what is born of the flesh is still flesh, whatever treatment it goes through.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Spared — the wheat and later grain survived only because they were still under the soil. The blow fell on what was already above ground.

- Dated — the state of the flax and barley pins the storm to early spring, only weeks before Israel went free. Writers differ over the exact month.

- Measured — Egypt had never seen ruin like it, yet mercy left a crop to feed the country through the year.

- Warned — hail is rain turned to ice, heaven's own gift becoming judgment on those who despise it.

- Wasted — the locusts would take what the hail left, because Pharaoh refused the one way out: letting the people go.

Exodus 9:33 · Darby

And Moses went out of the city from Pharaoh, and spread out his hands to Jehovah; and the thunders and hail ceased, and the rain was not [any more] poured on the earth.

Pharaoh has just confessed his sin and begged for the thunder to stop, and Moses goes outside the city to pray. Three things carry the meaning here: the gesture he makes, the place he chooses, and the speed of the answer.

The gesture of spread-out hands

Moses' posture carries a settled meaning across Scripture:

In Scripture, spreading out the hands is the confession of weakness and the attitude of prayer. With his lifted hands Moses secured the victory of Israel over the Amalekites (Ex. 17), who are a figure of the flesh.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

Moses holds no power of his own over the storm. His open hands admit it and ask God to lift it.

Why he left the city first

Moses did not pray where he stood. Leaving the city first was deliberate:

He went so far in the power of his God that he would not even pray inside the walls of the idol-worshipping city. He lifted up his hands when he was outside it, and at once the storm stopped. Then, exactly as predicted, Pharaoh and his court hardened their hearts.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

There was a second reason. Moses had already told Pharaoh when the plague would stop:

On the basis of his promise, however, Moses agreed to ask the Lord to remove the plague. It would stop the moment Moses left the city, showing that the earth is the Lord's (v. 29). Yet Moses adds that he knew Pharaoh and his servants would go on being rebellious (v. 30).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Proof in the sudden stop

A storm that fades on its own proves nothing. This one stopped the moment Moses prayed:

Moses, however, was not deceived by this fresh show of repentance and piety. He told him plainly that he knew he would not keep his promise. Yet he went out as an intercessor and spread his hands out to the Lord, and the visitation stopped as suddenly as it had begun. Both in its arrival and in its ending it proved itself to be an act of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Moses prayed for a man he knew was lying. The prayer went up anyway.

What the thunder was

The thunder that stopped had a name of its own, and a meaning far beyond Egypt's weather:

The terrible hail came with fire (lightning) that ran along the ground, and with thunderings. In Hebrew these are called "the voices of God." The tempest is the type of God's wrath in judgment. Hail is mentioned repeatedly in Revelation, where it is called "the plague of hail" (Rev. 8:7, 11:19, 16:21)... What a desperately wicked thing the human heart is. He sinned more after this than before.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Pharaoh had asked for these voices of God to stop. When they stopped, he stopped listening.

Answered prayer met with a harder heart

The relief Moses won brought Pharaoh's guilt into the open:

The king staggered under the blow, and again begged for relief. He even confessed that he had sinned, and that the Lord was righteous. Once more he promised he would let the people go, if only there would be no more mighty thunderings and hail... He sees and admits his guilt, and yet keeps on in his evil course — his open opposition to the Lord. For despite his confession, he went back to his hardened ways as soon as the Lord answered the prayer of Moses.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Another writer puts the same sequence in a single line, tying the breaking of the promise directly to the moment the prayer was heard:

The seventh plague (Ex. 9:13-35), hail with thunder and consuming fire, drew from Pharaoh the confession of his sin and a promise to let the people go, broken by him as soon as Jehovah heard the intercession of Moses.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Weakness. In Scripture, spread-out hands confess weakness and mean prayer. Moses stopped the storm by asking God, not by any power of his own.

- Separation. Moses would not pray inside a city full of idols. He carried his prayer outside the walls first.

- Signature. The storm stopped at the exact moment Moses had named. Its start and its end both bore God's mark — the earth is His.

- Sincerity. Moses had told Pharaoh to his face that he would break his word. He prayed for him anyway.

- Stubbornness. Relief did not soften Pharaoh. The moment the thunder stopped, he went back to his hardened ways and sinned more than before. God knew he would, and lifted His hand anyway — mercy received is not the same as a heart changed.

Exodus 9:34 · Darby

And Pharaoh saw that the rain and the hail and the thunders had ceased, and he sinned yet more, and hardened his heart, he, and his bondmen.

The storm stops, and within a sentence Pharaoh is worse than he was during it. Relief arrives, and the confession of verse 27 dissolves with it. Two hard questions follow. What is an apology worth when fear forces it out? And whose hand does the hardening?

A confession that did not survive the calm

Pharaoh had said the words. One commentator shows what they were worth once the danger passed:

Pharaoh could say, "I have sinned this time" (Ex. 9:27). He was alarmed by the thunder and hail, and he wanted them taken away. Yet he had not repented. He sinned even more and hardened his heart once the mighty thunderings had stopped.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The trigger was not a new temptation. It was the silence after the storm.

Moses' warning before the prayer

Moses promised the king relief. He also told him what he already knew about him and his court:

He admitted he had sinned — an astounding fall from his throne of pride. Moses promised relief, but added, "But as for you" — and we may well picture him looking round at the court — "and your servants, I know that you do not yet fear the LORD God" (Ex. 9:30), the Sole and Only and Everlasting One, the Maker of All!

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The mercy that hardened him

Kindness, not cruelty, set him off. One commentator turns this into a general rule about God's patience:

God's judgment is against everyone who goes on doing evil. The only remedy is turning to God, whose goodness keeps inviting people to repentance. Yet His patience so often makes men despise the riches of that goodness... With Pharaoh, what hardened his heart was nothing other than God's forbearing mercy (Ex. 8:15; Ex. 9:34). So the revolt of man's will against his Maker turns what should be for good into evil, again and again.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Whose hand hardened the heart?

Here Pharaoh hardens his own heart. Elsewhere Scripture says the Lord hardened it. Commentators hold both together, and insist on the order:

As to the hardening of Pharaoh's heart, notice that this never happened before Pharaoh's open unbelief. God never forced a man to be an unbeliever. Unbelief, at the start, is never the result of God's judicial hardening. Is there no such thing as hardening, then? ... Yes, there is. It is just as wrong to think God hardens a person the first time He sends a testimony as it is to deny that He hardens a person who has refused that testimony.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer points to the arrogance that came first:

It is true that God hardened Pharaoh's heart. But He did so only after Pharaoh had shown extreme and incredible arrogance by saying, "Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice…?" (Ex. 5:2) — and only after Pharaoh had hardened his own heart again and again.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

From king to court

The verse says it was not the king alone. One writer traces how the record builds, and where the court comes into it:

Three different words in the original Hebrew are translated "harden" when Scripture speaks of the king. Seven times it says, "He hardened his own heart," or "His heart hardened itself"... After this sevenfold stubbornness, and not till then, it says, "The Lord hardened Pharaoh's heart." It says this four times, and on the last occasion the judgment includes the hearts of Pharaoh's servants... A definite and deliberate stubbornness marks Pharaoh's spirit, along with a determined rejection of the divine warnings, growing deeper and deeper.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Two lists of confessions

Pharaoh's "I have sinned" puts him on a list. Scripture has two such lists, and the words are not what separates them:

It is very remarkable that many men in Scripture take the place of saying, "I have sinned," yet not all of them get cleansing. David... Daniel... the prodigal son, and the thief on the cross: these all took the place of sinners and all got cleansing or blessing. But look at Pharaoh (Exodus 9:27; 10:16), Balaam, Achan, Saul, Shimei, and Judas. These all confess they have sinned, yet they perish... There was no hatred of the sin. There was no desire to turn from it and give it up.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Relief — The hail stopping was the mercy Pharaoh asked for; the moment it came, he sinned more than before.

- Refusal — His "I have sinned" was fear of consequences, not hatred of sin, so it died with the thunder.

- Reversal — God's patience invites repentance; a rebel will turns it into an excuse to harden.

- Reach — The hardening did not stay with the king; his servants shared it, and shared the judgment.

- Ruin — Pharaoh's own hardening came first, and God's judicial hardening followed. God never makes a man an unbeliever. He seals the man who has already refused Him.

Exodus 9:35 · Darby

And the heart of Pharaoh was stubborn, neither would he let the children of Israel go, as Jehovah had spoken by Moses.

Exodus 9 ends the plague of hail exactly where it began: the king unmoved and Israel still in Egypt. The verse raises two hard questions. How can a man admit his sin out loud and change nothing? And how did his stubbornness still fit what God had already said?

The Broken Promise

The hail drew words of surrender out of Pharaoh. They lasted only as long as the storm.

Next came the seventh plague (Ex. 9:13-35), hail with thunder and consuming fire. It drew from Pharaoh a confession of his sin and a promise to let the people go. He broke that promise as soon as the Lord heard Moses pray for him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Confession That Is Not Repentance

Pharaoh's earlier words, "This time I have sinned," were true words. The motive behind them made them worthless. Others have said the same words with no repentance behind them.

God reads the heart, and He knows the motive of the creature. Pharaoh could say, "This time I have sinned" (Ex. 9:27). The thunder and hail alarmed him, and he wanted them removed. Yet he had not repented. He sinned still more and hardened his heart once the mighty thunderings had stopped… Saul said to Samuel, "I have sinned," but he gave away the state of his heart when he added, "Yet honour me now before the elders of my people and before Israel" (1 Sam. 15:30)… In none of these cases was there real repentance. In David's case how different. He was not thinking of his character before men, and how that could be saved. He saw and confessed what his guilt was before God.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The same pattern shows up in anyone who dodges the pain and stays unchanged:

Nature can take warnings and guard its course to escape the worst of judgment. Yet it never softens in the least into true repentance. This is just another form of selfishness. It saves itself. It takes enough interest in God's past ways to learn how it can go on ignoring and despising Him with the least danger to itself.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Moses Was Not Deceived

Moses said out loud what would happen, before he ever prayed for the hail to stop.

On the basis of his promise, however, Moses agreed to ask the Lord to remove the plague. Yet Moses adds that he knew Pharaoh and his servants would go on being rebellious (v. 30).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

His own confession is what exposes him:

The iniquity of Pharaoh is thus brought to light. He sees and admits his guilt, and yet keeps on in his evil course — his open opposition to the Lord. Despite his confession, as soon as the Lord answered Moses' prayer, he went back to his hardened ways. But again and again Scripture reminds us that this was no surprise to God. All this happened "just as the Lord had spoken through Moses" (v. 35). He saw the end from the beginning. Yet He removed His hand when Moses pleaded for the Egyptian king. God is never impatient, even in the face of open rebellion. He waits His own time, bearing with the wickedness and ungodliness of men in long-suffering and grace.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Whose Hardening?

Scripture says both things. Pharaoh hardened himself, and the Lord hardened him. The order matters.

It is indeed true that God hardened Pharaoh's heart. But He did so only after Pharaoh had shown extreme and unbelievable arrogance by saying, "Who is the Lord, that I should obey his voice…?" (Ex. 5:2). He did so only after Pharaoh had hardened his own heart again and again. In fact the Spirit uses two different words in the original language, and says no less than seven times that Pharaoh hardened his heart (Ex. 7:13, 14, 22; 8:15, 19, 32; 9:7). Only after that does Scripture say that God hardened the heart of Pharaoh (Ex. 9:12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

So what did God's hardening consist of?

If a man resists the light of God's testimony, God hands him over to blindness and hardness of heart as His judgment. God leaves him to himself. Then Satan comes in and carries him headlong to ruin. Pharaoh had plenty of light. It showed him the wild folly of trying to hold back the people God had commanded him to let go. But the real disposition of his heart was to act against God, and therefore God left him to himself.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Relief: When the hail stopped, every good intention stopped with it. Pharaoh's promise lasted as long as his pain, and no longer.

- Words: "This time I have sinned" was true and useless. God reads the motive, not the sentence.

- Contrast: David confessed his guilt before God. Saul and Pharaoh confessed to save face or to stop the pain. Only the first is repentance.

- Order: Pharaoh hardened his own heart seven times before Scripture says that God hardened it. God leaves a man to himself only after that man refuses the light.

- Word: The verse ends by tying the failure back to what God had said through Moses. Pharaoh's rebellion was no surprise to God, who still waited in patience.

Exodus 10:1 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Go in unto Pharaoh; for I have hardened his heart, and the heart of his bondmen, that I might do these my signs in their midst,

Exodus 10 opens with God sending Moses back into Pharaoh's palace. The reason He gives is startling: the king's stubbornness is part of God's own plan. So two questions follow. Is God to blame for Pharaoh's refusal? And why would God want a refusal that costs Egypt so much?

What the hardening means

Exodus uses two different Hebrew words for hardening. The order they come in settles much of the difficulty.

"And I will harden Pharaoh's heart." God had already said this in chapter 4:21. Eighteen times we read of the hardening of Pharaoh's heart. But the Hebrew uses different words here, and they mark an important distinction. One means to "make firm" or "strong." The other means "to make stubborn." These two words mark Pharaoh's hardening of his own heart, and God's hardening after Pharaoh kept on in his wicked way. Scripture says five times that Pharaoh hardened his heart. Only then did God begin His hardening and make Pharaoh's heart stubborn. Pharaoh hardened himself, then God hardened him. Pharaoh had his opportunities. As he refused and stayed in unbelief, God made him stubborn. God never hardens first, and He never forces anyone to be an unbeliever. There is a solemn warning here. Thousands harden their hearts now.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Who moved first

By the time God says "I have hardened his heart," Pharaoh has a long record behind him. Commentators count the hardenings differently, but they agree on the order. You can check it chapter by chapter.

It is true that God hardened Pharaoh's heart. But He did so only after Pharaoh had shown extreme and unbelievable arrogance by saying, "Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice…?" (Ex. 5:2). And only after Pharaoh had hardened his own heart again and again. In fact, the Spirit uses two different words in the original language, and states no less than seven times that Pharaoh hardened his heart (Ex. 7:13, 14, 22; 8:15, 19, 32; 9:7) before saying that God hardened the heart of Pharaoh (Ex. 9:12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

God gives men up; He does not make them bad

The hardening is a judgment, not a manufacture of evil. Writers press this point because the same principle runs through the rest of Scripture.

God never made any man bad. But He may, and in some cases does, give people up to the results of their own folly and evil. That is, He hardens in judgment those who make light of His grace and reject it… Pharaoh was wicked, and he grew more wicked the more patience God showed him. In the end the One he had despised blinded him in judgment and made him an example. All are responsible. Sin destroys the ability to obey God, not the responsibility to obey Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The refusal becomes a stage for God's signs

God tells Moses to walk back in precisely because Pharaoh will say no again. The stubbornness does not frustrate God's purpose; it serves it.

Pharaoh could not brush God's command aside by refusing to obey for ever. A creature resisting its Creator! Human will overcoming the Divine will! That could not be… Egypt's stubbornness would only display the glory of God more fully.

after_note: DELETE

C E Stuart

A story built for the grandchildren

The stated aim reaches past the palace to Israel's family table. The signs were meant to be watched, then retold.

Again the Lord reminds Moses that He Himself had hardened Pharaoh's heart and the hearts of his servants. He did this so that He might show His signs before them in public. He did it too so that His great works of power might have a very real effect on Israel's own generation and on the generations to come. Then they would realize that it was indeed the living Lord of glory who was dealing with them.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The verdict outsiders reached

The story travelled, and not only among Israelites. Centuries later the Philistines' own priests pointed back to Pharaoh. Their verdict: the fault was his.

The Philistines give us another striking witness against Pharaoh. The ark of God was with them, and they wanted rid of it… So they send for the priests and diviners. These men tell the people to "give glory to the God of Israel… Why then do you harden your hearts, as the Egyptians and Pharaoh hardened their hearts? When He had worked wonders among them, did they not let the people go, and they departed?" Here is a witness three hundred and fifty years later to the fact of the Exodus. It is also an admission from the priests of a foreign nation that Pharaoh had acted wrongly. Israel's natural enemies drew the conclusion… that the king met a just judgment, since he had hardened his heart against the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal first. Again and again Pharaoh hardens his own heart. Only after that does Scripture say God hardened it. The order of the record answers the objection.

- Hardening second. Two Hebrew words mark the difference. The king "makes firm" his own heart. God then "makes stubborn" the man who keeps refusing.

- Signs third. God sends Moses back in knowing the answer will be no. The refusal opens the way for God to show more signs in public.

- Story fourth. The purpose runs down the generations. Israel's children and grandchildren would hear what God did in Egypt, and would know the living Lord was dealing with them.

- Verdict last. The account travelled so far that even Israel's enemies drew the same conclusion. Pharaoh hardened his heart, and his judgment was just.

Exodus 10:2 · Darby

and that thou mightest tell in the ears of thy son and thy son's son what I have wrought in Egypt, and my signs which I have done among them; and ye shall know that I am Jehovah.

God speaks to Moses before the eighth plague. He explains why He has let the struggle with Pharaoh run so long. What happens in Egypt will become a story that children and grandchildren hear. The verse ties three things together: a hardened king, signs done in Egypt, and a people who come to know the LORD.

Why the Hardening Is Mentioned Here

The reason God gives for the state of Pharaoh's heart is not secrecy but display. One writer connects the hardening directly to the two audiences named in the verse — those watching then, and those who would only hear about it later.

Again the Lord reminds Moses that He Himself had hardened Pharaoh's heart and the hearts of his servants. He did this so that He might show His signs openly before them. He did it also so that God's great works of power might have a very real effect on Israel's present generation and on the generations to come. Then they would realize that it was indeed the living Lord of glory who was dealing with them (vv. 1-2).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The Order of Events

Where does the hardening fall in the sequence? One writer places it after Pharaoh has already set himself against God.

God had dealt graciously with Pharaoh. He gave him chance after chance to agree to what He asked. Pharaoh still hardened his heart, and showed his deep-rooted hatred and hostility to God and His people. Now this proud enemy comes under the hardening God sends in judgment… Unbelief never begins as the result of that hardening. But let there be no doubt that there is such a thing as hardening.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Another writer traces the blinding back to testimony that Pharaoh had already scorned.

God never made Pharaoh, or anyone else, wicked. They were wicked already, and they had plenty of urgent testimony. By God's judgment that testimony served only to blind the king. From the first he asked with scorn, "Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice and let Israel go? I do not know the LORD, and moreover, I will not let Israel go."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Stubbornness Turned Into Testimony

Pharaoh's refusal does not block God's purpose. It gives Him the occasion for more of it.

Generations not yet born should hear of the works of the Lord, and of how He stepped in for Israel. They should know that He is the Lord. Egyptian stubbornness would only serve to display the glory of God further.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Signs Done "Among Them"

The verse calls these events signs, not just punishments. One writer points first to what they exposed in Egypt, and then to what God meant them to teach Israel.

The plagues were signs as well as judgments. God sent them to prove who Jehovah was. Egypt once knew enough of God to keep it from idolatry. But it "did not see fit to acknowledge God," and so it had sunk into the worst idolatry. Above all, God sent the plagues to teach Israel that Jehovah alone is God.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

A Chain of Telling

Son and grandson are only the start of a line that keeps going. Another writer sets out that pattern and what the telling should produce.

God had "established a testimony" for the fathers to pass on to the children, and for the children to pass on to their children. He did it so that they might set their hope in God, walk in obedience, and not forget His works. In this way they would escape the stubbornness of earlier generations. Those generations did not set their affections on God, and their spirits were not steadfast with God.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Same Duty Today

What Israel owed its children, Christian families owe theirs.

And Christians may well tell their children what God has done. We should ground our little ones in the great truths of God's word. We should plant the facts of redemption, resurrection, and ascension in their minds and memories.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Another writer adds that the children's interest follows the parents' own.

One thing is sure: what deeply affects the parents will make an impression on the children… The story must pass from generation to generation. And how it warms the hearts of parents to see the eager way the children listen to it.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal. Pharaoh hardened his own heart first. God's hardening in judgment came only after Pharaoh had refused His testimony again and again. God never made any man wicked.

- Purpose. That refusal did not block God. Egyptian stubbornness only served to display God's glory further.

- Signs. The plagues were not just judgments on Egypt. Above all, God sent them to teach Israel that Jehovah alone is God.

- Telling. God established a testimony to pass from fathers to children, and from those children to theirs. The next generation would then set their hope in God and not forget His works.

- Knowing. The chain ends where the verse ends: they may know He is the LORD. So Christians today should ground their own children in redemption, resurrection, and ascension.

Exodus 10:3 · Darby

And Moses and Aaron came to Pharaoh, and said to him, Thus saith Jehovah the God of the Hebrews How long dost thou refuse to humble thyself before me? let my people go, that they may serve me.

Moses and Aaron come to Pharaoh again, and the message they bring is not a polite request. Three things carry the verse: who is speaking, what He asks of the king, and why He wants Israel let go.

The One who speaks

One writer points to the tone of the message:

Again Moses and Aaron entered the king's palace. Again they addressed him, carrying a fresh message from the God of the Hebrews. The language was plain. It was not the language of a courtier addressing his master. It was the true God speaking to His creature.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Pharaoh had once asked who this Lord was. He was finding out:

Pharaoh was learning, but was he submitting? He had now learned that the Lord was the God of the Hebrews. "Who is the Lord, that I should obey His voice?" he had asked, in anything but a meek spirit. Now he learns that the Lord really exists, and something of His power… God was becoming known to the Egyptians by acts of judgment — a fearful way of revealing Himself.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

"How long?" — the measure of God's patience

The question itself is a mercy. God sends one more message, and He warns of the locusts a day in advance:

Yet such is the patience of God that Moses was sent once more to Pharaoh with a protest and a demand that he let the people go. God warned him that, if he still refused, He would strike Egypt with swarms of locusts. This was to happen "tomorrow." In the previous chapter God twice announced a plague for tomorrow. That gave at least twenty-four hours' delay, in case Pharaoh should relent. In contrast, salvation, as we know, is always presented today.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The locusts were not inevitable:

The message named the only way of escape: Pharaoh must humble himself before the Lord, and let Israel go.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

"My people" — a contest over ownership

One word in the demand — "My" — settles the whole struggle:

The word to him was, "Let My people go…" So the Lord at once claimed the people as His. For a century or two the Pharaohs of Egypt had regarded the people as theirs, and enslaved to them. From the very start the two claims stood against each other. The Lord claimed the people that Pharaoh regarded as his own. Which claimant would prevail? The issue could not be in doubt for one moment.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Released for a purpose: "that they may serve me"

God is not only ending their misery. He gives a reason for the rescue, and He gives it again and again:

When God took up the people of Israel, He set His love on them, and wanted them to serve Him in response. The beginning of Exodus shows them under a slavery that was nothing like what God wanted for them. They were Pharaoh's slaves. Seven times, as far as I can trace, God said, "Let My son (or, let My people) go that they may serve Me." For the moment they were Pharaoh's servants. But God regarded them as "the sons of Israel," and He sets them free so that they might serve Him.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

But why did they have to leave Egypt to do it?

The Exodus is the separation of the people of God from the world… Israel was to go out of Egypt to serve the Lord, or hold a feast to Him. They could not serve Him or offer sacrifice to Him in the land of their slavery, in front of that people. Their religious service was of such a character that Egypt would not tolerate it.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

What refusing to humble yourself looks like

Pharaoh does eventually say the word "sinned" (v. 16) — and still does not bend. Commentators read him as the standing example of a confession that costs nothing:

He gives us the classic example of the sinner who defies God. Yet he is quite ready to take a humble attitude, if that helps him avoid reaping the punishment he deserves. We have to remember this word: "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy" (Proverbs 28:13). Under punishment Pharaoh did not mind doing a little confessing. But he had no idea of giving up his self-willed way.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Who asks. This is the true God speaking to His creature. It is not a courtier's request, but the Creator's claim on a king who had asked who the Lord was.

- How long. God's patience comes with a deadline. He sets the locusts for "tomorrow" — while salvation is always offered today.

- Whose people. Two owners claimed the same nation, and the outcome of that contest was never in doubt for a moment.

- What for. The demand carries its own purpose. They go free so that they may serve, and that service could not happen in Egypt.

- What refusing costs. Pharaoh confessed but did not change. God named one way of escape — humbling himself — and that was the one thing he refused.

Exodus 10:4 · Darby

For, if thou refuse to let my people go, behold, I will to-morrow bring locusts into thy borders;

Pharaoh has already lost his water, his livestock and his crops, and now a fresh message reaches him. It holds two things together: a condition still open ("if you refuse") and a deadline already set ("tomorrow").

The refusal of a creature

Everything hangs on Pharaoh's "no." One writer explains why that refusal could not last:

Pharaoh could not treat God's summons as nothing by refusing forever to obey. A creature resisting its Creator! Human will overcoming the divine will! That could not be. So God spoke to Moses again, told him what He would do, and gave His servant a fresh message for the stubborn ruler of the land of Egypt.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Why "tomorrow" and not "now"

The threat comes with a delay built into it. That gap is deliberate, and it fits a pattern already running through the earlier plagues:

Yet God is so patient that He sent Moses once more to Pharaoh with a protest and a demand that he let the people go. God warned Pharaoh that if he still refused, He would strike Egypt with swarms of locusts. This was to happen "tomorrow." In the previous chapter God twice announced a plague for tomorrow. That gave at least twenty-four hours' delay in case Pharaoh should relent. By contrast, salvation, as we know, is always offered today.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The hail had already stripped the land, and the locusts would finish it. Pharaoh also had reason to take the date seriously: every earlier "tomorrow" had arrived as announced.

The hail had killed the cattle. It also struck every plant of the field and broke every tree. The desolation was widespread. Now the locusts would complete it. Every green thing would be eaten. "Tomorrow," Moses had said, and the swarms of flies came the next day. "Tomorrow" was the warning for the disease on the livestock; the next day came, and it appeared. "Tomorrow" was the word for the hail, and the next day the Lord rained hail on the land. Every time, God sent the plague He had foretold. It did not wait a single day. Just one night came between the warning and the plague each time.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

What a swarm of locusts does

Here is what a swarm of locusts does to a land:

They are remarkable for the huge numbers that suddenly swarm over a district, and for the vast destruction of plant life they cause in a very short time. As the prophet says, before them the land may be like the garden of Eden, and behind them a desolate wilderness; nothing escapes them.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Egypt trusted a god to guard against this very danger:

Locusts covered the face of the whole earth and every green thing was destroyed. There is a vivid description of the damage locusts do in the book of Joel. Locusts are typical of God's punishing judgments. The locust plague was meant to show the helplessness of the Egyptian god Serapis, whom the Egyptians trusted to protect them from locusts.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

An army with no king of its own

"I will bring locusts" makes the insects God's instrument. One writer takes their strange order as evidence of whose they are:

Man may have departed from God and become hostile to Him. Yet nature in its whole framework obeys Him and still serves Him. So the sinner finds himself in a stream of hostile forces — the armies of the Lord. The army of locusts vividly pictures them for us. "The locusts have no king, yet all of them march in rank," says Agur. One observer says nothing in their habits is more striking than the stubbornness with which they all keep to the same line of march. They move like a disciplined army. This instinctive discipline, under an invisible king, shows whose armies they are and who marshals them: "His army," the Lord calls them.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The question the plague answered

Pharaoh had once said he did not know the Lord. The plagues had already answered him:

Could Pharaoh still say, "Who is the Lord? I do not know the Lord"? What an answer he had already been given. The Lord he did not know had power over the waters and over the ground. He had power over the bodies of men and animals, and power over the air. In what area of the natural world was He not supreme? He could foretell the plagues. He could bring the plagues. He alone could remove the plagues.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Condition — "If you refuse" leaves the door open. The plague hangs on one thing: whether Pharaoh will let God's people go.

- Deadline — "Tomorrow" gives twenty-four hours of delay, in case he relents. Salvation, by contrast, is always offered today.

- Credibility — every earlier "tomorrow" had arrived on time. This warning was no bluff.

- Instrument — locusts turn a garden into desert, and the god Egypt trusted could not stop them.

- Ownership — they march in rank with no king of their own, because they are the Lord's army. Whoever refuses Him finds creation lined up against him.

Exodus 10:5 · Darby

and they shall cover the face of the land, so that ye will not be able to see the land; and they shall eat the residue of that which is escaped, which ye have remaining from the hail, and shall eat every tree which ye have growing in the field;

God tells Moses to warn Pharaoh of a swarm so vast that the ground will vanish under it. The locusts will eat whatever the hail left, and then the trees in the fields. The threat raises two questions: why God announces a blow before He sends it, and what breaks a hard heart.

A blow announced a day early

God sets the locusts for "tomorrow." The delay has a reason.

Yet God is so patient that He sent Moses once more to Pharaoh with a protest and a demand that he let the people go. God warns him that if he still refused, He would strike Egypt with swarms of locusts. This was to happen "tomorrow." In the previous chapter God twice announced a plague for tomorrow. Each time He gave at least twenty-four hours of respite, in case Pharaoh might relent. In contrast to this, salvation, as we know, is always presented today.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

God had given Pharaoh that same gap before. Every time, the blow landed on schedule.

Moses had said "tomorrow" for the swarms of flies (8:23). The next day they came. "Tomorrow" was the warning for the disease among the cattle. The next day came, and the disease appeared (9:5). "Tomorrow" was the word for the hail (9:18). The next day the Lord rained hail on the land. Each time God sent the plague He had foretold. It did not delay for a single day.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Aimed at what the hail left

The locusts had a precise target: what the last plague had left. Two things survived the hail.

Even in those days everyone knew locusts as a serious plague. The warning made plain that this one would be worse: it would destroy all that was left in the land. The wheat and rye escaped before, but they would not escape this. The hail had broken the trees of the field, yet they were still in leaf. Now the locusts would strip them bare. Only one way of escape was open: Pharaoh must humble himself before the Lord and let Israel go.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A swarm that hides the ground

Locust swarms still do this today. Few disasters are feared more.

Today, in the east and in some parts of Africa, no disaster is feared more, and none leaves man more helpless. Locusts often devour every green thing. They fly in masses so dense that they blot out sun and sky.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The gods of Egypt had no answer

Egypt had its own god to keep locusts away.

Locusts covered the face of the whole earth and destroyed every green thing. The book of Joel vividly describes the damage locusts do. Locusts are a picture of God's judgments that punish. This plague aimed to show the powerlessness of the Egyptian god Serapis, whom the Egyptians trusted as their protector against locusts.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Pharaoh did not know this God. The plagues showed him how far His power reached.

The Lord whom he did not know had power over the waters, power over the ground, power over the bodies of men and animals, and power over the air. In what part of the natural world was He not supreme? He could foretell the plagues. He could bring the plagues. He alone could remove the plagues.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

A warning that carries past Egypt

The plagues were not only about one king and one country.

Chapter 10 opens with the Lord telling Moses that He had hardened their hearts, and so shut them up to their doom. That also gave the Lord the occasion to display Himself as the God of judgment in such a way that it would be remembered in generations to come. This witness still stands even in our day, and it will be remembered until the day of grace is followed by the time of judgment. Then God will deal in His righteous judgment and wrath not with Egypt only but with the whole earth, as pictured in Revelation 6-11, 15, 16. Of that coming day of judgment the plagues of Egypt were a small sample.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

No room to bargain

Pharaoh's answer to the threat was to bargain.

His servants protested. Moved by this, he recalled Moses and Aaron and proposed another cunning device, raising a question about who should go. In reply, Moses made it quite plain that there is no compromise permitted when God makes His demands. The Lord claimed the people as His: men, women, children and possessions.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned — God announced the locusts a day ahead, leaving room for Pharaoh to relent. Salvation, by contrast, is always offered today.

- Certain — every earlier "tomorrow" had come on time, so this threat carried a proven record.

- Thorough — the swarm targeted the leftovers: the grain the hail had missed and the trees it had only broken.

- Helpless — locusts blot out the sky and leave nothing green. Egypt's own god of protection could do nothing.

- Remembered — Pharaoh's one escape was to humble himself and let Israel go. He refused, so the plague stands as a witness and a small sample of judgment still to come.

Exodus 10:6 · Darby

and they shall fill thy houses, and the houses of all thy bondmen, and the houses of all the Egyptians; which neither thy fathers nor thy fathers' fathers have seen, since the day that they were upon the earth unto this day. And he turned and went out from Pharaoh.

Moses finishes his warning and walks out of the palace without waiting for a reply. The swarm he describes will fill every house in Egypt, on a scale no living person has ever seen.

A message delivered, not negotiated

Moses does not stay to bargain. One writer pictures how he and Aaron stood before the king:

The tone was severe. It is impossible to imagine them wringing their hands and bowing low before the king. "Thus says the LORD, the God of the Hebrews, 'How long will you refuse to humble yourself before me? Let my people go, that they may serve me,'" and then the alternative — locusts! — and without waiting for a reply, Moses "turned and went out from Pharaoh."

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

A warning with a deadline

Moses had set the locusts for the next day. Pharaoh already had a record of what "tomorrow" meant:

Tomorrow he had said; what "tomorrows" there had been. "Tomorrow" Moses had said the swarms of flies would come (8:23). On the next day they came. "Tomorrow" the plague on the livestock had been threatened. The next day came, and the animals died (9:5). "Tomorrow" the hail had been predicted (9:18). On the next day the LORD rained hail on the land. Each time the plague foretold was sent. It did not delay for a single day. Just one night came between the warning and the plague each time. And Pharaoh, waking on the new day, had to hear of the sorrow and destruction spreading over the country.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Nothing green left

The locusts would eat what the hail had spared. Egypt had already lost much before they came:

Horses, donkeys, camels, oxen and sheep had died in the plague on the livestock. Cattle had also been killed by the hail, which struck down every plant of the field and broke every tree as well. The flax and the barley had been struck too. The ruin was truly widespread. Now the locusts would complete it. Every green thing would be eaten. Plant life would seem to stop.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Locusts are not a random weapon. In Scripture they carry a settled meaning. In Egypt they also struck at a particular point of national confidence:

The book of Joel gives a vivid description of the damage locusts do. Locusts are typical of God's punitive judgments. The plague of locusts was meant to show that the Egyptian god Serapis had no power. The Egyptians trusted him as their protector against locusts. Locusts are also mentioned in a symbolic way in Revelation 9:1-12.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Beyond anything remembered

Moses set this swarm against everything earlier generations had seen. Ordinary swarms are already staggering:

In modern times enormous flights of locusts have covered an area of over a thousand miles. When they were driven into the sea, their bodies formed a bank on the shore about four feet high and fifty miles long! In India a piled-up mass of these insects stopped a railway train, as if it had run into a snowdrift. But the locusts threatened here were such as had never been before, and such as would never be again.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Told to sons and grandsons

The verse looks back to fathers and grandfathers. God had already told Moses to look forward:

"Go in to Pharaoh, for I have hardened his heart and the heart of his servants, that I may show these signs of mine among them, and that you may tell in the hearing of your son and of your grandson what signs I have done among them, that you may know that I am the LORD" (Ex. 10:1-2). Generations not yet born would hear of the works of the LORD. They would hear how He stepped in for Israel. They would know that He is the LORD. Egyptian stubbornness would only serve to display the glory of God further.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

A shaken court, an unmoved king

Moses left without an answer, and the warning went to work on the men around the throne:

The thought of it was terrible to the court. For the first time the flatterers around Pharaoh spoke out. The custom of the palace was set aside. A fear greater than their fear of the king drove them to speak.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Their appeal did not change the outcome:

The threat of the locusts eating what remained after the hail brought Pharaoh's servants to their senses. But Moses demanded that all should go — old and young, children and cattle — to keep their feast to the LORD (no word now of three days). So they were driven out from before the king, and the eighth blow fell all over the land. The powers of the air were at the LORD's command and against Egypt.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned. Every plague came announced, so Pharaoh was never struck without notice.

- Dated. "Tomorrow" had always meant tomorrow; each earlier threat arrived exactly on schedule.

- Total. What the hail spared, the locusts would eat. Every green thing gone, and Egypt's protector-god shown to have no power.

- Unmatched. Ordinary swarms can darken a thousand miles. This one went past anything the fathers or grandfathers could remember.

- Remembered. The point was not just ruin but testimony: sons and grandsons were to be told, so that they would know He is the LORD.

Exodus 10:7 · Darby

And Pharaoh's bondmen said to him, How long shall this man be a snare to us? let the men go, that they may serve Jehovah their God dost thou not yet know that Egypt is ruined?

The men around Pharaoh's throne break their silence and tell their king what he will not admit: the country is already in ruins. Their words raise a hard question — why can a man see the damage his own rebellion has done and still refuse to repent?

Fear of God above fear of the king

Until now the court had flattered Pharaoh and followed his lead. The threat of locusts changed that.

The prospect was terrifying to the court. For the first time the flatterers around Pharaoh spoke out. They set aside the usual custom of the palace. A fear greater than the fear of the king drove them. "Let the men go," they said; "do you not yet understand that Egypt is ruined?"

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

What they had learned about the God of the Hebrews

Their advice was short and blunt. Behind it lay a conclusion about the God they were dealing with.

They spoke in a tone that neither they nor the king were used to. They dropped flattery. Long speeches were out of the question. They spoke plainly, in words that were few, earnest and unmistakable... They were willing to get rid of Israel, and to do it at once and with no conditions. The God of the Hebrews, they were waking up to see, was not One to be trifled with.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Pharaoh's own household as witness against him

This verse is one link in a chain of admissions inside Egypt. God had His own purpose in Pharaoh, yet voices in Pharaoh's own court proved him responsible.

The Lord always acts for His own glory or name. "For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, 'For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth'" (Rom. 9:17). Yet the king of Egypt was responsible. His own people and the nations around him were witnesses of it. First we have Exodus 8:19: "Then the magicians said to Pharaoh, 'This is the finger of God.'" Second (Ex. 9:20), "Whoever feared the word of the LORD among the servants of Pharaoh hurried his slaves and his livestock into the houses." Third (Ex. 10:7), "Pharaoh's servants said to him, 'How long shall this man be a snare to us? Let the men go, that they may serve the LORD their God.'" Fourth (Ex. 11:3), "the man Moses was very great in the land of Egypt, in the sight of Pharaoh's servants and in the sight of the people."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Seeing the ruin without repenting

The servants could count the cost; Pharaoh could not. But seeing the damage is not the same as repenting, and the warning reaches far past Egypt.

In his blind hatred, Pharaoh did not know what his servants saw: the land of Egypt was ruined. His heart was hardened to his own destruction. The same warning goes to the Philistines: do not harden your hearts in the same way. So it is. Human nature can take a warning and steer its course to escape the worst of judgment, and never soften in the least into true repentance. This is simply another form of selfishness. It will save itself. It takes just enough interest in God's past dealings to learn how it can go on ignoring and despising Him with the least danger to itself.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

That verdict falls on the advisers too. Their alarm never became obedience.

Pharaoh's court stepped in when the locusts were threatened. Yet they would not yield to the LORD. They preferred Pharaoh's favour. The hardening of their hearts on that occasion is very striking.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The bargain that follows the plea

Their words did move the king to call Moses back — but only to negotiate over who would leave.

At their urging, "Moses and Aaron were brought back to Pharaoh. And he said to them, 'Go, serve the LORD your God. But which ones are to go?'" This shows once again the wretched heart of this most wretched king. If he is forced to, he will loosen his grip, but even then he will hold on to all he can. He clings so tightly to what he has that he will bargain, if he can, with Moses about who should leave.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Moses gave no ground. What he refused sets the pattern for every believer.

There is to be no compromise. The believer is to be for the Lord, his household is also for the Lord, and all that he possesses. Let every child of God have the same purpose of heart in this as Moses did.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Pressure speaks. A greater fear loosened the courtiers' tongues. They set aside palace custom and dropped their flattery.

- Pressure teaches. What they learned was limited but real — the God of the Hebrews is not One to be trifled with.

- Pressure convicts. Magicians, servants and court all speak up inside Egypt. That leaves the king with no excuse.

- Pressure does not convert. A warning can make a man dodge the worst of judgment without ever softening him into true repentance. These same advisers chose Pharaoh's favour over God's claim.

- Pressure bargains. Forced to loosen his grip, Pharaoh still tries to keep what he can. The answer to every such offer is no compromise: you, your household and all you own are for the Lord.

Exodus 10:8 · Darby

And Moses and Aaron were brought again to Pharaoh. And he said to them, Go, serve Jehovah your God. Who are they that shall go?

Locusts will strip whatever the hail left, and Pharaoh's own officials have told him Egypt is ruined. So he calls back the two men he threw out and seems to give way — but he attaches a question, and that question is the whole battle.

Why Pharaoh called them back

Pharaoh did not send for Moses out of a change of heart. His court forced his hand, and they did it in language a king rarely hears.

The threat of the locusts woke them up. They believed it would come unless the king relented. They knew of only one thing that could stop it: the king's surrender to the command given to him. So they had to speak. And speak they did, in a way that surely neither they nor the king was used to. Flattery was discarded. Wordiness was out of the question. They spoke in plain, blunt language, in words that were few, earnest, and impossible to mistake.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The question behind the permission

"Go, serve the LORD your God" sounds like surrender. The words that follow undo it.

This reveals once again the wretched heart of this most wretched king. If compelled, he will relax his grasp, but even then he will retain all that he can. He holds on tightly to what he had — so tightly that he will bargain with Moses, if he can, about who is allowed to leave.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

One offer in a series

Pharaoh pictures the energy of Satan, the ruler of this world, then as now. He fought every inch of the road. When hard pressed, he offered a series of compromises. Moses said to him, "Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel, 'Let my people go, that they may hold a feast to me in the wilderness.'" Pharaoh said, "Go, sacrifice to your God within the land" — that is, set up worldly worship... Then Pharaoh said, "I will let you go to sacrifice to the LORD your God in the wilderness; only you must not go very far away" — that is, don't be very separate. His next question was, "Go, serve the LORD your God. But which ones are to go?" Moses replies, "We will go with our young and our old. We will go with our sons and daughters and with our flocks and herds, for we must hold a feast to the LORD." Pharaoh answers, "No! Go, the men among you, and serve the LORD." This means the parents may be for the Lord, but the children must be kept in the world.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why a half-deliverance is no deliverance

Moses answers with young and old, sons and daughters, flocks and herds. Nothing less would take Israel out of Egypt.

Parents in the wilderness and their children in Egypt! Terrible anomaly! That would have been only a half deliverance — useless to Israel and dishonouring to Israel's God. This could not be. If the children stayed in Egypt, you could not say the parents had left it, since their children were part of themselves. At most you could say they were serving Jehovah in part and Pharaoh in part. But Jehovah could have no part with Pharaoh. He should either have all or nothing.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The hostage strategy

The offer was a trap. Leaving the children behind would have brought the whole nation back.

With an arrangement like that, the shrewd negotiator knew very well he would have them all back in his power sooner or later. If the Hebrews had gone without their children, their hearts would have stayed in Egypt while their bodies were in the wilderness. That is a miserable condition and an insult to God. Their bodies are no use to Him without their hearts.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

God's answer to Pharaoh's question

Pharaoh asked who would go. God's answer runs the other way, and it still stands in the New Testament.

In God's plan, however, the little one's place was with the parents. Pharaoh's plan was to keep hold of the fathers through the children. God's plan is to save the children along with the fathers, and through them... "The promise is for you and for your children," says the apostle on the day of Pentecost.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Pressure, not repentance — Pharaoh's own officials told him Egypt was ruined. He reopened talks out of fear, not out of a changed heart.

- Concession with a catch — He grants the words "serve the LORD," then takes the ground back with one question: who may go?

- Half out is still in — Children left behind would leave the parents only half out. They would serve God in part and Pharaoh in part.

- Hostages, not kindness — Whatever stays in Egypt keeps the heart in Egypt, and the body follows it back.

- All, or nothing — Moses names young, old, sons, daughters, flocks and herds. God claims every person and everything His redeemed people have.

Exodus 10:9 · Darby

And Moses said, We will go with our young and with our old, with our sons and with our daughters; with our flocks and with our herds will we go; for we have a feast of Jehovah.

Plague after plague has worn Pharaoh down, and at last he offers terms — but he demands to know who is going. Moses answers that every person and every animal goes, and gives one reason: a feast to the Lord.

Pharaoh's Bargain

The king's question is not curiosity. He is bargaining over how much of Israel he can keep.

This reveals once again the wretched heart of this most wretched king. If forced, he will loosen his grip, but even then he will hold on to all he can. He clings to what he had, and clings so tightly that he will bargain, if he can, with Moses about who should leave.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Pharaoh's offer — men out, children in — would have left Israel half-delivered.

Parents in the wilderness and their children in Egypt! What a terrible contradiction! This would only have been a half deliverance, useless to Israel and dishonouring to Israel's God. It could not be. If the children stayed in Egypt, no one could say that the parents had left it, since their children were part of themselves.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

"With Our Young And Our Old"

Moses refuses to separate what God has joined together.

We should always remember — strange that we should ever forget! — that our children are part of ourselves. God's creative hand has made them so; and surely what the Creator has joined together, the Redeemer would not separate. So we always find that God links a man and his house together. "You and your house" is a phrase of deep practical meaning. It carries the highest consequences. It brings the richest comfort to every Christian parent. And we may truly add this: neglecting it has led to the most disastrous results in thousands of family circles.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Two Opposite Strategies

Pharaoh and God both have a plan for the children, and the two plans pull in opposite directions.

So here is another attempt to narrow the limits of salvation. The men may go; the little ones must stay. In God's plan, though, the little one's place was with the parents. Pharaoh's aim was to keep hold of the fathers through the children; God's thought is to save the children along with, and through, the fathers. Noah's house, in the ark with him, is the first example... The new is fuller still of this: "Today salvation has come to this house," says the Lord about Zacchaeus. "The promise is for you and for your children," says the apostle on the day of Pentecost. And once more, to the Philippian jailer: "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household."

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The Reason Moses Gives

Moses does not argue about what small children can understand. He points to the occasion itself.

The reason they were to take the little ones and everything else with them was that they were going to hold a feast to the Lord. Nature might say, "What can these little creatures know about a feast to the Lord? Are you not afraid of making them formalists?" The reply of Moses is simple and decisive: "We will go with our young... for we must hold a feast to the Lord." They had no thought of seeking one thing for themselves and another for their children. They never dreamed of Canaan for themselves and Egypt for their children.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Flocks And Herds Too

The list does not stop at people. The flocks and herds go too, and redemption is the reason.

Moses is very clear about who shall go... Everyone they loved and everything they owned was to go. All for God — that was Moses' motto. Christian mothers, converted fathers, do you see this? We are not going to be a divided family, says Moses; and more than that, we shall take every sheep and every bullock we own, for it all belongs to God. Why? Because redemption puts you on the ground of belonging to God completely.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why It Could Not Happen In Egypt

The feast is the whole point of the departure, and it is the one thing Egypt could never host.

The Exodus is the separation of the people of God from the world. And I was recently struck by this feature of the scene: Israel was to go out of Egypt to serve the Lord, or hold a feast to Him. They could not serve Him or sacrifice to Him in the land of their slavery, in front of the Egyptians. Their worship was of such a character that Egypt would not tolerate it. It went so far against everything the Egyptians thought that they would persecute and destroy them if they saw it. So they had to go out.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Feast — Moses gives one reason for taking everybody: they must hold a feast to the Lord. Egypt could never host that worship.

- Whole — so nothing stays behind: young, old, sons, daughters, flocks and herds all go. Redemption makes the whole of life God's.

- House — children are part of their parents. On the principle of "you and your house," God's way is to save the children along with the fathers.

- Half — Pharaoh offers a half deliverance: parents in the wilderness, children still in Egypt. That would leave the parents not out of Egypt either.

- Bargain — Pharaoh gives ground only under pressure and keeps whatever he can. Each offer holds back part of what belongs to God.

Exodus 10:10 · Darby

And he said to them, Let Jehovah be so with you, as I let you go, and your little ones see that evil is before you!

Nine plagues have worn Pharaoh down, and now he tries to settle the matter by bargaining: the men may go and worship, but the little ones stay. His words carry a sneer at the Lord, a threat, and a charge that Israel is plotting evil.

A threat wrapped in mock piety

Pharaoh's opening line sounds like a blessing, but he does not mean it as one. He mocks the thought that the God of Israel can help them. His closing words can be read two ways: as an accusation of evil intent, or, as older translations put it, as a warning that "evil is before you" — trouble waiting ahead.

He tried to intimidate Moses. He warned him that if they all left they would run into serious trouble. And he implied, with a sneer, that they could not depend on any real help from the Lord being with them (v. 10).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The children as hostages

The offer looks generous. It is Pharaoh's most cunning move yet: whoever holds the children holds the parents.

Next (Ex. 10:10), Pharaoh would profess to let the people go, while retaining their little ones. A more cunning and preposterous suggestion could not be made. What more effective way of bringing the people back to Egypt than by holding fast their families in bondage? Sadly, letting the world rule in the home has spoiled many a testimony and many a complete separation!

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Half a deliverance is no deliverance

Leaving the children behind would split Israel between two masters. God takes no divided service.

Parents in the wilderness and their children in Egypt! Terrible contradiction! This would only have been a half deliverance, at once useless to Israel and dishonouring to Israel's God. This could not be. If the children remained in Egypt, no one could say the parents had left it, since their children were part of themselves. At best they would be serving Jehovah in part and Pharaoh in part. But Jehovah could have no part with Pharaoh. He should either have all or nothing.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Where the heart is left behind

Pharaoh knew where hearts follow. Leave the children in Egypt, and the parents' affections stay there too.

By such an arrangement that shrewd negotiator knew perfectly well that he would have them all back in his power sooner or later. If the Hebrews had gone without their children, their hearts would have stayed in Egypt while their bodies were in the wilderness. That is a miserable condition and an insult to God, for their bodies are no use to Him without their hearts. God's purpose is to bring them entirely out of Egypt. He would fix all the objects of their interest and affections outside its borders — "to deliver us from the present evil age," and to set our "minds on things that are above." Pharaoh's purpose is to fix the objects of their love and interest in the old kingdom of sin and condemnation. In that way he keeps them tied to it as tightly as if bound by chains.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

You and your household

God deals with families the other way round. Writers trace one pattern from Noah into the New Testament — and mark its limit.

The men may go; the little ones must remain. In God's plan, however, the little one's place was with the parents. Pharaoh's thought was to keep hold of the fathers by means of the children; God's thought is to save the children with, and by means of, the fathers. Noah's house, in the ark with him, is the first example... The new is still more full of this: "Today salvation has come to this house," says the Lord about Zacchaeus. "The promise is for you and for your children," says the apostle on the day of Pentecost... And once again to the Philippian jailer: "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household."... It does not follow automatically that if a man is saved himself, his house will be saved too.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

One move in a longer campaign

This offer is one of four. Set beside Pharaoh's other offers in Exodus, it forms a chain of retreats, each one still holding something back.

With what persistence Satan disputed every inch of Israel's way out of the land of Egypt! He first tried to keep them in the land. Then he tried to keep them near the land. Next he tried to keep part of themselves in the land. When none of these three worked, he tried to send them out without any ability to serve the Lord. If he could not keep the servants, he would seek to keep their ability to serve, which would answer much the same purpose.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Sneer. Pharaoh's "the LORD be with you" is mockery and threat in one. He hints that God will be no real help, and that trouble waits outside.

- Leverage. Holding the children was the surest way to bring the parents back. Families kept in Egypt are chains on people already in the wilderness.

- Hearts. Bodies in the wilderness with hearts still in Egypt is no deliverance. God's aim is to move everything a person loves outside Egypt's border.

- All or nothing. Children are part of their parents. A divided Israel would serve Jehovah in part and Pharaoh in part, and God accepts no such split.

- Household. Pharaoh holds fathers by their children. God saves children with their fathers — Noah's house, Zacchaeus's house, the jailer's house.

Exodus 10:11 · Darby

Not so go now, ye [that are] men, and serve Jehovah! for it is that ye have desired. And they were driven out from Pharaoh's presence.

Moses has just told Pharaoh who is going: everyone — young and old, sons and daughters, flocks and herds. Verse 11 is the king's counter-offer, and it ends with Moses and Aaron thrown out of the palace.

A bargain, not a release

Pharaoh does not say no. He says some. He has stopped refusing outright and started bargaining.

This reveals once again the wretched heart of this most wretched king. If compelled, he will relax his grasp, but even then he will retain all that he can. He clings so tightly to what he had that he will bargain, if he can, with Moses about who should leave.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why the children were the target

The offer was not generosity. It was insurance.

By their little ones he had them safe, of course — a perfectly good security that they would not go far away. And so it is still. How many are brought back into the world by the children they did not bring with them out of the world.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The same writer sets Pharaoh's plan against God's. He then traces God's pattern through the rest of Scripture:

The men may go; the little ones must remain. In God's plan, however, the little one's place was with the parents. Pharaoh's thought was to keep hold of the fathers by means of the children; God's thought is to save the children with, and by means of, the fathers. Noah's household, in the ark with him, is the first example... The New Testament is still more full of this: "Today salvation has come to this house," says the Lord about Zacchaeus. "The promise is for you and for your children," says the apostle on the day of Pentecost. And once again to the Philippian jailer: "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household."

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Half a deliverance

Moses could not take that deal. The reason runs deeper than family feeling.

Parents in the wilderness and their children in Egypt! Terrible contradiction! This would only have been a half deliverance, useless to Israel and dishonouring to Israel's God. This could not be. If the children remained in Egypt, the parents could not possibly be said to have left it, since their children were part of themselves. The most that could be said in such a case was that in part they were serving the Lord, and in part Pharaoh. But the Lord could have no part with Pharaoh. He should either have all or nothing.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The tone of the refusal

Read alongside verse 10, the offer carries a sneer. He warns them of trouble ahead, then claims he is only granting their own request.

He tried to intimidate Moses by warning him that if they all left they would run into serious trouble, sarcastically implying that they could not count on any real help from the Lord being with them (v. 10). He would give permission only for the men to go, knowing that they would soon return when they did not have their families with them. So Moses and Aaron were driven out from Pharaoh's presence (v. 11). Such is the stubborn pride of an ungodly man of the world, influenced by Satan!

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

One offer in a series

Verse 11 is the third in a run of offers, each conceding a little more ground while keeping something back.

With what persistence Satan disputed every inch of Israel's way out of the land of Egypt! He first tried to keep them in the land, then to keep them near the land, next to keep part of themselves in the land, and finally, when he could not succeed in any of these three, he tried to send them out without any ability to serve the Lord. If he could not keep the servants, he would try to keep their ability to serve, which would achieve much the same end.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same trap today

The trap did not close with Pharaoh.

And how many Christians are caught in this snare! They claim to be the Lord's and to have left Egypt, yet they allow their families to stay behind... Nowhere does our testimony break down so plainly as in our families. Godly parents, whose own walk is blameless, are talked into allowing their children things they would never allow themselves, and so they flood their houses with the sights and sounds of Egypt.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- All. Moses asked for all — young and old, sons and daughters, flocks and herds. Pharaoh answered: the men only.

- Bargain. Pharaoh no longer refuses; he negotiates. Under pressure he loosens his grip, but keeps everything he can.

- Hostage. The children left behind were security. Whoever holds the family holds the men. Many drift back into the world through the children they never brought out of it.

- Half. Parents free and children still in Egypt is only half a rescue — part serving the Lord, part serving Pharaoh. God will have all or nothing.

- Series. This is one of four attempts: keep Israel in the land, keep them near it, keep part of them behind, then take away their ability to serve. Each concession sounds reasonable; each keeps something back.

Exodus 10:12 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Stretch out thy hand over the land of Egypt for the locusts, that they may come up over the land of Egypt, and eat every herb of the land -- all that the hail hath left.

Exodus 10:12 comes at the moment when talking stops and God acts. Pharaoh has just refused to let the whole nation go, Moses and Aaron have been thrown out of the palace, and now the command names its target: the locusts are to eat whatever the hail had spared.

Why the blow falls here

Pharaoh had offered a bargain: the men could go and worship, but the families must stay. Commentators read that offer as a trap, and its refusal as the reason the eighth plague lands.

Pharaoh tried to bargain. He would let the men go and sacrifice, but all the rest would stay in his power. He knew enough of human nature to be sure that this would bring the men back under his authority... The offer was: let each man go, but let him leave his household behind. But if God was to have any, He would have all.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Moses had asked for everyone. He no longer even mentioned the three-day journey.

The threat that locusts would eat what the hail had left brought Pharaoh's servants to their senses. But Moses demanded that all should go — old and young, children and cattle — to keep their feast to Jehovah. There was not a word about three days now. So Moses and Aaron are driven out from the king's presence, and the eighth blow falls all over the land. The powers of the air were at the command of Jehovah and against Egypt.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The hand that holds the rod

In that world a rod in the hand meant authority, and Egypt's own monuments put one in the hands of its gods.

In the East the rod is a symbol of authority and power... Hundreds of Egypt's old monuments show gods and men holding rods like sceptres... Satan had the power and the authority, and Jehovah would hand these over to Moses as His servant. Again and again, as the story goes on, Moses is said to hold the rod of God.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The same rod runs through the whole contest, from the first sign to the Red Sea:

It first swallowed up the rods of Egypt, to show that no strength could stand before God's strength... Then the rod brings the plagues of blood, of frogs, and of lice, until the magicians admit that they cannot match their strength against the Lord's (Ex. 8:19). It is then used in the plagues of hail (Ex. 9:23), locusts (Ex. 10:13), and darkness (Ex. 10:22). At the end it is used to destroy the firstborn, to deliver Israel, and to overthrow Egypt in the Red Sea (Ex. 12 - 14).

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The wind that carries the army

Between the raised hand and the arriving swarm stands an ordinary east wind. One writer pictures the angry court while the answer is already on its way.

The court may have been too full of anger to hear the threatening sound of the rising east wind. Moses had already lifted the rod at God's command. The wind had risen, and it blew for the rest of the day and all through the night. Jehovah's army of the skies had been waiting twenty-four hours away, and it was already in flight.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The wind is God's servant, not an accident:

The wind, as all else, is used by God to work out His purposes with man. Ex. 10:13; Ps. 135:7; Ezek. 13:13.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

"All that the hail has left"

The command points back. The hail had already flattened much of Egypt, and the locusts are sent for what is left.

Horses, donkeys, camels, oxen and sheep had died in the disease that struck the livestock. The hail had killed cattle too. It also struck down every plant of the field and broke every tree. The flax and the barley had been struck as well. The ruin really was general. Now the locusts would complete it. They would eat every green thing. Plant life would seem to come to an end.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Total ruin of the land still does not produce surrender:

Hail and lightning together break the fruit trees of the land. The locusts then strip it of every green leaf that can be found. The ruin is complete, yet their rebellious pride is still not humbled. One last decisive blow is needed to make them give in.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Egypt's failed protector

Egypt had a god assigned to this very danger, and the swarm exposed him.

The locusts covered the face of the whole earth and destroyed every green thing... Locusts are a picture of God's judgments that punish. This plague of locusts was meant to show the helplessness of the Egyptian god Serapis, whom the Egyptians trusted as their protector against locusts.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal — Pharaoh offered half: the men could go, the families must stay. God asks for all, not part.

- Rod — the raised hand holds the rod of God, used from the first sign to the Red Sea. The authority Egypt claimed now rests in the hand of God's servant.

- Wind — an east wind carries God's army while the court is still fuming. The weather runs His errands.

- Residue — the locusts take what the hail spared. The ruin is complete, and nothing is left to lean on.

- Result — total ruin, and a failed Egyptian god, still do not bend Pharaoh. One last blow is needed.

Exodus 10:13 · Darby

And Moses stretched out his staff over the land of Egypt, and Jehovah brought an east wind on the land all that day and all that night. When it was morning, the east wind brought the locusts.

Pharaoh has just driven Moses and Aaron out of his palace, and God answers the king's last word with a wind. Why does God work through weather rather than a bare command, and what does an east wind mean in Scripture?

The Air Obeys Him

Eight plagues in, the arena of God's power widens again. Now the sky itself obeys.

The threat of the locusts to eat what remained from the hail brought Pharaoh's servants to their senses. But Moses demanded that all should go — old and young, children and cattle — to keep their feast to the Lord. There was not a word about three days now. So Moses and Aaron are driven out from before the king, and the eighth blow falls all over the land. The powers of the air were at the command of the Lord and against Egypt.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The wind is not a background detail. Scripture counts it among the tools God keeps in hand.

God uses the wind, as He uses everything else, to work out His purposes with man. Ex. 10:13; Ps. 135:7; Ezek. 13:13. As the unseen wind comes and goes, and we do not know where, "so it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit." John 3:8. You feel its power, and the result lasts.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why an East Wind

Of all directions, this one carries a settled meaning through Scripture.

The east wind was harsh and destructive to plants (Gen. 41:6, 23, 27). It was dangerous to ships at sea (Ps. 48:7; Ezek. 27:26). It is a symbol of the withering power of God's judgements. Hosea 13:15.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What the wind carried had a target too. Egypt kept a god for this very danger.

The book of Joel gives a vivid description of the damage locusts do. Locusts are typical of God's punitive judgments. This plague was meant to show that the Egyptian god Serapis had no power. The Egyptians had trusted him as their protector against locusts. Revelation 9:1-12 also mentions locusts in a symbolic way.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Day and a Night of Waiting

The wind blows for about a day before anything appears. That gap is the distance the swarm had to cross. The wind both calls the swarm and carries it.

The court was probably too full of anger to hear the ominous sound of the rising east wind. Moses had already lifted the rod at God's bidding. The wind rose, and it blew for all the remaining hours of the day and on through the night. Already the Lord's army of the skies, which had been lying at twenty-four hours' distance, was on the wing. Obeying the call of the wind, the huge host arose, and, carried on its gusts, the myriads sped on towards the land of Egypt.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Morning Keeps the Appointment

Moses had said "tomorrow" and the locusts land in the morning. By now this was a pattern Pharaoh could have counted on.

Moses delivered his message, and left the king and his courtiers to think it over. He had said tomorrow; what "tomorrows" there had been. "Tomorrow," Moses had said, the swarms of flies would come (8:23). On the next day they came. "Tomorrow" the cattle disease had been threatened. The next day came, and the disease appeared (9:5). "Tomorrow" the hail had been predicted (9:18). On the next day the Lord rained hail on the land. Each time God sent the plague He had foretold. It did not delay for a single day. Just one night came between the warning and the plague each time.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Nature Turned Against the Rebel

Was this a miracle or ordinary weather? Commentators note that the judgments here also follow natural lines.

But notice now, as every commentary points out, that these judgments of God which begin here have to some degree their natural counterparts... Such a link between these divine judgments and ordinary events surely has meaning for us. It is not only the sparing use of the miraculous, which many have remarked on. Much more, it shows how the whole order of nature marshals itself under the divine hand against the one who breaks His law.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What arrived on that wind was without parallel, before or since.

At the command of the Lord, Moses stretched out the rod in his hand over the land of Egypt. The east wind blew that day and night. It brought a tremendous swarm of locusts, such as had never been before, and we are told there would never again be such a scourge (v. 14).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Command — Pharaoh spoke his last word, and God acted. The powers of the air were at the Lord's command and against Egypt.

- Courier — the wind is God's servant. It blew a full day and night to fetch an army already waiting at twenty-four hours' distance.

- Character — an east wind is Scripture's picture of withering judgment. Locusts are typical of God's punitive judgments, aimed here at a god Egypt trusted for protection from them.

- Clock — "tomorrow" was the promise, and morning kept it. Every plague foretold came without a day of delay.

- Creation — the plague ran along ordinary lines of nature. Even so, the whole order of nature marshals itself under God's hand against the one who rebels.

Exodus 10:14 · Darby

And the locusts went up over all the land of Egypt, and rested in all the borders of Egypt, very grievous; before them there were no such locusts as they, neither after them will be such.

Hail had already stripped Egypt. This verse marks the moment the locusts land, and it raises two questions: what brought them, and why no swarm like it would ever come again.

The wind that carried them

The locusts did not drift in by chance.

At the command of the Lord, Moses stretched out the rod in his hand over the land of Egypt. The east wind blew that day and night. It brought a tremendous swarm of locusts such as had never been before, and we are told there would never again be such a scourge (v. 14).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The wind mattered for more than transport.

In the last two plagues God used the air and the wind to work His will. The locust obeys the wind. These plagues set aside Egypt's deities of air and wind, as earlier plagues had set aside their deities of earth and water.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

A swarm without equal

Bad locust swarms were nothing new in that part of the world.

The records of the east hold plenty of accounts of the damage a bad swarm of locusts does. This blow was so severe that there had never been such locusts before, and there never would be again. So we can imagine the terrible plight of the land of Egypt.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the land looked like afterwards

A swarm this size does not merely damage crops. It leaves a country unrecognisable — and it spared no district, not even the region where Israel lived.

Then came the rush of the wings of the moving millions. A moment later the devouring hosts covered the land, and the noise of their unstoppable jaws filled it. Every green thing fell before them. They took away all that the hail had left. So far as the eye could reach, the land of Egypt was a wilderness, as barren as the yellow deserts on its borders. Goshen — the garden of Egypt — also fell under the plague, for its fruits and its crops were no longer necessary for Israel.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The answer to Pharaoh's question

Pharaoh — Meneptah — began this contest by asking who the Lord was that he should obey Him.

Eight plagues had now been sent, and this last a dreadful one. Locusts on the ground, covering the face of it, so that the land was darkened. Locusts, too, in their houses, and filling them. And when they were gone, not a green thing in herb or tree could be seen. Could Meneptah still say, "Who is the Lord? I do not know the Lord." What an answer he had already received. The Lord he did not know had power over the waters, over the ground, over the bodies of men and animals, and over the air. In what area of the natural world was He not supreme? He could foretell the plagues. He could bring the plagues. He alone could remove the plagues.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The blow landed on Egypt's religion too.

The book of Joel gives a vivid description of the damage locusts do. Locusts are a picture of God's judgments in punishment. The locust plague was aimed to show the powerlessness of the Egyptian god Serapis. The Egyptians trusted him as their protector against locusts. Locusts are also mentioned in a symbolic way in Revelation 9:1-12.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

An army under orders

Locusts move with a discipline no one commands, and Scripture names the commander.

Man may have departed from God and become hostile to Him. But nature in its whole framework is obedient, and serves Him still. So the sinner finds himself in a stream of hostile forces, the hosts of the Lord. The army of locusts gives us a vivid picture of them. "The locusts have no king," says Agur, "yet all of them march in rank." (Proverbs 30:27.) This instinctive discipline, under an invisible king, shows whose hosts they are and who marshals them: the Lord calls them "His army." (Joel 2:11.)

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Wind — The swarm came on an east wind at God's word. The air itself, and every god Egypt trusted in it, lay under His hand.

- Weight — This blow stood alone: no such locusts before it, none after it, and not a green thing left in tree or field.

- Reach — Water, ground, bodies and now the air had all obeyed Him. Pharaoh had asked, "Who is the Lord?" Every area of nature gave him the answer.

- Rank — Locusts march in rank with no king, and the Lord calls them "His army." Even the insect world serves His purposes.

- Rivals — Egypt trusted the god Serapis to guard it from locusts. The plague showed him powerless, as earlier plagues had shown the gods of earth and water.

Exodus 10:15 · Darby

And they covered the face of the whole land, so that the land was darkened; and they ate every herb of the land, and all the fruit of the trees that the hail had left; and there remained not any green thing on the trees, and in the herbs of the field, throughout the land of Egypt.

A swarm of locusts settles over the whole land of Egypt. It blots out the light and eats everything the hail had spared. The verse records a country stripped bare. It raises two questions: who commands such an army, and why God sent it against Egypt.

The scene on the ground

One writer pictures how that morning looked and sounded. Even Goshen, where Israel lived, was hit this time.

In the early morning, right on time, a yellow fringe appeared all along the eastern horizon. It spread fast across the sky. Like a dense brown cloud, it covered the blue and shut out the light. Then came the rush of wings from the moving swarms. A moment later the devouring hosts covered the land and filled it with the noise of their unstoppable jaws. Every juicy plant fell before them. They took away all that the hail had left. As far as the eye could see, the land of Egypt was a wilderness, as barren as the yellow deserts on its borders. Goshen — the garden of Egypt — also came under the plague, for its fruits and crops were no longer needed for Israel.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

What the hail spared

The words "that the hail had left" tie this plague to the last one. The hail had broken trees and flattened crops, but not everything. The locusts finished the job, and the warning came with a way out.

Even in those days locusts were well known as a serious plague. The warning made the extra severity of this one clear: it would destroy all that was left in the land. The wheat and rye had escaped before, but they would not escape this. Also, the hail had broken the trees of the field, but they were still in leaf. Now the locusts would strip them bare. There was one way of escape: Pharaoh must humble himself before the Lord and let Israel go.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

An army under orders

Locusts have no visible leader, yet they move like a trained army. One writer sees a clue there to who directs them.

Man may have departed from God and become hostile to Him, but nature in its whole framework is obedient, and serves Him still. So the sinner finds himself in a stream of hostile forces — the hosts of the Lord. The army of locusts pictures them for us. "The locusts have no king," says Agur, "yet all of them march in rank" (Prov. 30:27)... This instinctive discipline, under a king no one can see, shows whose hosts they are and who commands them. The Lord calls them "His army" (Joel 2:11)... To fight them is hopeless. The destruction they cause is total: "The land is like the garden of Eden before them, but behind them a desolate wilderness, and nothing escapes them" (Joel 2:3).

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Aimed at Egypt's gods

This plague was not random damage. It had a specific target.

Locusts covered the face of the whole land and destroyed every green thing. The book of Joel gives a vivid description of the damage locusts do. Locusts are typical of God's punitive judgments. The plague of locusts aimed to show the powerlessness of the Egyptian god Serapis. The Egyptians trusted him as their protector against locusts. Locusts are also mentioned symbolically in Revelation 9:1-12.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

No corner of creation left

The idols could do nothing here. The plagues showed Pharaoh a God at work in every part of the natural world.

Pharaoh did not know this Lord. Yet He had power over the waters, power over the ground, power over the persons of men and animals, and power over the air. In what area of the natural world was He not supreme? He could foretell the plagues. He could bring the plagues. He alone could remove the plagues. He did what the idols could not. He proved to be the absolute Master of the powers of nature. He alone decides the destiny of His creatures, and He would prove that too.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The confession that did not last

This ruin broke Pharaoh — for a moment. One writer follows the locusts to their end, and shows who followed them there.

Pharaoh took a humble attitude. He confessed that he had sinned and asked for a forgiveness that would also remove the punishment. The Lord knew his heart, yet He listened to his plea. By a strong west wind He removed the locusts so completely that not one was left. The locusts were drowned in the Red Sea. Not many days later Pharaoh and his armies were drowned there too.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Total — The locusts took everything the hail had left. Egypt was as barren as the deserts on its borders.

- Targeted — The plague struck at Serapis, the god Egypt trusted for protection from locusts. Locusts picture God's punitive judgments.

- Commanded — Locusts have no king, yet they march in ranks. The Lord calls them "His army." The sinner who defies God meets forces that still serve Him.

- Comprehensive — Water, ground, people, animals, air: Pharaoh met a God who could foretell the plagues, bring them, and alone remove them.

- Temporary — Pharaoh's confession lasted only as long as the pressure. The locusts drowned in the Red Sea, and soon he did too.

Exodus 10:16 · Darby

And Pharaoh called Moses and Aaron in haste; and he said, I have sinned against Jehovah your God, and against you.

The locusts have stripped Egypt bare, and Pharaoh sends for Moses and Aaron in haste. His words sound like those of a broken man — but what is a confession like this worth?

The confession the locusts squeezed out

Pharaoh does not send for Moses in a calm hour of reflection. He calls him while the locusts eat his land. He names both the Lord and His servants as the ones he has wronged. But he asks for one thing only: this plague gone.

Under the pressure of this severe blow, Pharaoh summoned Moses and Aaron into his presence again. He confessed his sin against the Lord their God and against them. He begged forgiveness, and asked them to plead with the Lord their God "only to remove this death from me." The Lord heard the plea of Moses. He removed the locusts and cast them into the Red Sea.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

God answered Moses and lifted the plague. That mercy shows His patience with a rebel:

God is never impatient, even in the face of open rebellion. He waits for His own time, bearing with the wickedness and ungodliness of men in long-suffering and grace.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Confession under fear

Pharaoh had said these words once before, when the hail fell. Saying them a second time raises a hard question.

Pharaoh had once said, "I have sinned" (9:27). He said it now again. But confession under fear — what is it worth? … In this there was no work of conscience, no real repentance. He wanted God's hand removed from his land; that was all. It was removed. But his heart stayed as hard as ever.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Confessing without forsaking

A confession can use the right words and still change nothing. The test is not the wording but the will behind it.

He gives us the classic example of the sinner who defies God. Yet he is quite ready to look humble, if that helps him avoid reaping the punishment he deserves. We have to remember this word: "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy" (Prov. 28:13). Under chastening, Pharaoh did not mind a little confessing. But he had no idea of forsaking his self-willed way. The fair words he spoke in verses 16 and 17 of our chapter were merely an effort to avoid further punishment.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The same words, opposite outcomes

The same three words come from very different men in Scripture. The outcomes split in two.

Many men in Scripture take the place of saying, "I have sinned." It is very remarkable that not all of them get cleansing. David (2 Samuel 12:13), Nehemiah (Nehemiah 9:33), Job (Job 40:4; 42:6), Isaiah (Isaiah 6:5; 64:6), Jeremiah (Jeremiah 14:7, 20), Daniel (Daniel 9:5), Micah (Micah 7:9), the prodigal son (Luke 15:21), and the thief on the cross (Luke 23:41) all took the place of sinners. They all received cleansing or blessing. But look at Pharaoh (Exodus 9:27; 10:16), Balaam (Numbers 22:34), Achan (Joshua 7:20), Saul (1 Samuel 15:24; 26:21), Shimei (2 Samuel 19:20), and Judas (Matthew 27:4). These all confess they have sinned, yet they perish. … There was no hatred of the sin. There was no desire to turn from it and give it up. There was no true repentance.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

David used the same words. The difference was who he had in view.

In David's case how different. He was not thinking of his reputation before men, and how that could be saved. He saw and confessed what his guilt was before God. He cast himself on Him without reserve.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Dodging the blow, keeping the heart

Self-interest can study God's dealings closely. The aim is not to be changed, but to work out how little it must give up.

Human nature can take warnings and steer its course to escape the worst of judgment, and never soften in the least into true repentance. It is only another form of selfishness. Such a heart will save itself. It takes just enough interest in God's past ways to learn one thing. It wants to know how to go on ignoring and despising Him with the least danger to itself.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Pressure: The confession comes while the locusts eat Egypt. The timing shows what produced it.

- Words: He says the right thing. He had said it once before under the hail, and changed neither time.

- Motive: He asks for the plague to go, not for sin to go. He wanted relief, and relief was all he got.

- Test: God gives mercy to the one who confesses and forsakes. Pharaoh did the first and never tried the second.

- Outcome: David, the prodigal son and the dying thief said "I have sinned" and found blessing. Pharaoh, Saul and Judas said it and perished. Same words, different heart.

Exodus 10:17 · Darby

And now, forgive, I pray you, my sin only this time, and intreat Jehovah your God that he may take away from me this death only!

The locusts have stripped Egypt bare, and Pharaoh calls for Moses and Aaron in a hurry. He names his sin, asks pardon "only this once," and begs for the plague to go — but is saying the right words the same as meaning them?

Words spoken under pressure

This is not the first time Pharaoh has admitted fault.

Pharaoh had once said, "I have sinned" (9:27). He said it now again. But confession under fear, what is it worth? "I have sinned against the Lord your God, and against you" (10:16-17). In this there was no conscience work, no real repentance. He desired the removal of God's hand from his land; that was all. It was removed. But his heart remained as hard as ever.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Confessing without forsaking

Admitting a wrong and leaving it are two different acts. Pharaoh does only the first.

He is the classic example of the sinner who defies God. Yet he is quite ready to look humble, if that lets him escape the punishment he deserves. We have to remember this word: "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy" (Prov. 28:13). Under chastisement Pharaoh did not mind doing a little bit of confessing, but he had no idea of forsaking his self-willed way. His fine words in verses 16 and 17 were only an effort to avoid further punishment.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Sorrow over the damage, not over the sin

Pharaoh wants "this death" taken away — the ruin in his fields. One writer describes a second kind of sorrow that never goes further than that.

The second is the sorrow that goes with the fear of the consequences, and not because of the hatefulness of the sin itself. This experience is selfish through and through. It is not godly grief, which produces a repentance leading to salvation without regret. It is worldly grief, and that produces death (2 Cor. 7:10). In this sorrow the devil seems very near. He mocks the soul in its distress and adds to its fears, while the soul vows again and again to avoid that trap in future, if only it can escape the consequences. He can mock with confidence. He knows that while the soul stays self-centred, it will go back to that same weakness, as the dog returns to its vomit.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

What his own plea admitted

Pharaoh asks Moses to pray. That plea grants what he once denied — this God, and no other, can lift the plague.

God had now sent eight plagues, and this last one was dreadful... Could Pharaoh still say, "Who is the Lord? I do not know the Lord"? What an answer he had already received. The Lord he did not know had power over the waters, power over the ground, power over people and animals, and power over the air. In what area of the natural world was He not supreme? He could foretell the plagues. He could bring the plagues. He alone could remove the plagues. He did what the idols could not.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The same words on other lips

Very different people have said the same words. The heart behind them, not the phrase, decided the outcome.

But others have said, "I have sinned," and it came to nothing; for God reads the heart, and He knows the motive of the creature. Pharaoh could say, "This time I have sinned" (Ex. 9:27), when the thunder and hail alarmed him and he wanted them gone. Yet he had not repented. Once the mighty thunder stopped, he sinned still more and hardened his heart. He confessed the same a second time, after the locusts destroyed all the plants the hail had spared. But his only aim was to get rid of that plague (Ex. 10:16-17). Saul said to Samuel, "I have sinned." Yet he gave away the state of his heart when he added, "Yet honor me now before the elders of my people and before Israel" (1 Sam. 15:30).

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Where the words are meant

Set against Pharaoh's bargaining is David, who said far less and received everything.

"I have sinned against the Lord." It was a short, real, solemn confession. David admitted that he was in God's hands and deserved only death for his offences. "The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die," was the prophet Nathan's immediate and reassuring reply... There was nothing for him but the sovereign mercy of God. Could that mercy reach him? God did not leave him in doubt for a moment.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Pressure. Pharaoh speaks only because the locusts have ruined Egypt. Ask what a confession made under fear is worth before you trust it.

- Words. He confesses, but he does not forsake. He will look humble to escape punishment, but he will not give up his own way.

- Relief. Grief that hates the damage instead of the sin is selfish. It goes back to the same sin once the pressure lifts.

- Motive. God reads the heart, not the sentence. Pharaoh and Saul said the same words as David and gained nothing.

- Mercy. David's short, real confession met an immediate answer: his sin put away, his life spared.

Exodus 10:18 · Darby

And he went out from Pharaoh, and intreated Jehovah.

Locusts have stripped Egypt bare, and Pharaoh calls back the two men he had driven out. He admits he has sinned and begs them to pray — so Moses goes out and prays for a king whose repentance will not last.

Prayer offered, prayer heard

Pharaoh asks for one thing, and Moses takes it to the Lord.

Under the pressure of this heavy blow, Pharaoh once again summoned Moses and Aaron into his presence. He confessed his sin against the Lord their God and against them, begged forgiveness, and asked them to plead with the Lord their God "only to remove this death from me." The Lord heard the intercession of Moses, and He removed the locusts and cast them into the Red Sea.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

God listens to a plea He can see through

The men Pharaoh had thrown out are called back in haste. God is not fooled by the humble words, yet He answers — and one writer notes where the locusts ended up, and who would end up there soon after.

Pharaoh hurried to call back Moses and Aaron, whom he had driven from his presence a few days before. He took a humble attitude. He confessed he had sinned, and he asked for a forgiveness that would include lifting the punishment. The Lord knew his heart, yet He listened to his plea. By a strong west wind He removed the locusts, so that not one was left. The locusts drowned in the Red Sea. Not many days later Pharaoh and his armies drowned there too.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Confession under fear

Pharaoh's words sounded right. He had used them once before.

Pharaoh had once said, "I have sinned." He said it now again. But confession under fear — what is it worth? … In this there was no work of conscience, no real repentance. He wanted God's hand removed from his land; that was all. It was removed. But his heart remained as hard as ever.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Another writer names the test: admitting the fault is not the same as leaving it.

He is the classic example of the sinner who defies God. Yet he is quite ready to adopt a humble attitude, if by it he may avoid reaping the punishment he deserves. We have to remember this word: "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy" (Proverbs 28:13). Under chastening Pharaoh did not mind doing a little confessing. But he had no intention of giving up his self-willed way.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why God lifts each blow at all

The lifting of the plague says something about God — and something about the man it leaves unchanged.

The stopping of each blow shows God's willingness to withdraw His hand from judgment. It shows judgment to be His strange work. Pharaoh hardens his heart not only by refusing to bow under the plagues. He hardens it by keeping on in his course after God answered his cry and lifted the plague. So neither God's severity in sending the plague nor His goodness in removing it touches such a man. His heart is fully set in him to do evil.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The patience that answers anyway

So why does God answer at all? One writer points to what God wants for the sinner.

It is beautiful to notice God's tender ways of grace, even with a hardened sinner. If there is even the slightest turning of heart to Him, He is ready to hear — though He knows it is not real. This is a striking testimony that He does not want the sinner to die. Indeed, He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. (2 Peter 3:9)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Relief asked. Pharaoh wanted the plague gone, not his sin gone. God's hand off his land was all he was after.

- Relief prayed for. Moses went straight out and interceded for the king who had just driven him from the palace.

- Relief granted. God knew the heart behind the plea and answered anyway. He is ready to hear at the slightest turning toward Him.

- Relief complete. Not one locust was left. The same sea that swallowed the swarm drowned Pharaoh and his armies days later.

- Relief wasted. Neither God's severity in sending the blow nor His goodness in lifting it moved a heart set on evil. Mercy that is not met with forsaking only hardens.

Exodus 10:19 · Darby

And Jehovah turned a very powerful west wind, which took away the locusts, and drove them into the Red Sea there remained not one locust in all the borders of Egypt.

The locusts came on one wind, and now God turns another wind to sweep them into the sea. Two questions follow: what moved God to lift His hand, and what did the relief do to Pharaoh?

The wind is God's servant

Egypt worshipped many gods, including gods of the air and the wind. Both the plague and its removal ran on the wind.

In the last two plagues God used the air and the wind to work His will. The locust obeys the wind. Egypt's deities of air and wind were set aside, as had been their deities of earth and water. The plague of the locusts, together with that of the hail, destroyed the sacred trees of the land. People prayed to these trees for help at harvest time. Everyone, from the highest to the lowest, bowed to the sycamore and gave it a tribute of the fruits of the earth.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

God listens to a plea He knows is hollow

Pharaoh's plea was not sincere, and God answered it anyway. One writer sees God's grace at work here, even toward a hardened man.

It is beautiful to notice God's tender ways of grace, even with a hardened sinner. If there is the slightest turning of heart to Him, He is ready to hear, even though He knows it is not real. This is a striking testimony that He does not will the sinner's death. Indeed, He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. (2 Peter 3:9.)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Where the locusts ended up

The verse names where the locusts ended up — the Red Sea. What that sea did to the insects, it later did to the king.

Pharaoh took a humble tone. He confessed that he had sinned, and he asked for a forgiveness that would also take away the punishment. The Lord knew his heart, yet He listened to his plea. By a strong west wind He removed the locusts so completely that not one was left. The locusts were drowned in the Red Sea. Not many days after Pharaoh and his hosts were drowned there too.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

"I have sinned" — said twice, meant neither time

This was not the first time Pharaoh said those words.

Pharaoh had once said, "I have sinned" (9:27). He said it now again. But confession under fear, what is it worth? In this there was no work of conscience, no real repentance. He wanted God's hand off his land; that was all. It was removed. But his heart remained as hard as ever.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

What was missing from his confession

Confession is only half the test. A second word must stand beside it.

He gives us the classic example of the sinner who defies God. Yet he is quite ready to look humble if that way he can avoid reaping the punishment he deserves. We have to remember this word: "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy" (Prov. 28:13). Under chastening Pharaoh did not mind doing a little bit of confessing, but he had no idea of forsaking his self-willed way. The fair words he spoke in verses 16 and 17 of our chapter were merely an effort to avoid further punishment.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Relief, then a harder heart

The relief did not set Israel free. Mercy and hardening stand side by side here.

Moses prayed for Egypt, and God again gave relief. He sent a very strong west wind that carried all the locusts away and drowned them in the Red Sea (v. 19). However, in His sovereign government God hardened Pharaoh's heart so that he still refused to allow Israel to leave.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The same story repeats far from Egypt.

Many a sinner has been brought by sudden sickness down to the door of death, and he has cried aloud for mercy. God heard his prayer and restored him to health. But instead of giving himself to the service of God, as he thought and intended, he returns to his old course of forgetfulness and sin.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Wind — the locusts came on one wind and left on another. The air Egypt worshipped carried out God's will, and the plague stripped Egypt's sacred trees bare.

- Mercy — God answered a plea He knew was insincere. He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

- Completeness — God removed the locusts so completely that not one was left in all Egypt.

- Grave — the sea that swallowed the locusts swallowed Pharaoh and his army a few days later. The place of his relief became the place of his ruin.

- Test — Pharaoh confessed but never forsook, so the mercy only hardened him. Whoever confesses and forsakes will obtain mercy.

Exodus 10:20 · Darby

And Jehovah made Pharaoh's heart stubborn, and he did not let the children of Israel go.

The eighth plague is over: the locusts are gone from Egypt, yet Pharaoh's answer stays the same. The last line of the chapter raises a hard question: if the LORD hardened Pharaoh's heart, how was Pharaoh still to blame?

Where the Hardening Begins

The objection is a fair one: how can God punish a man for a resistance He Himself put there? One writer answers by pointing to where these words come in the story:

Satan would raise a doubt here: where was the sin of Pharaoh, if his heart was hardened like this? Or how could God justly destroy a man He had hardened to resist Him? If people had noticed where these words come in the story, the difficulty would have disappeared... Note then that God does not say this of Pharaoh until after Pharaoh had scornfully rejected the claims of the LORD. He had said, "Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice and let Israel go? I do not know the LORD, and moreover, I will not let Israel go." He rejected the word of the LORD. He set himself in open opposition to Him and to His people. Now God hardens his heart as an act of judgment. And God still acts on the same principle... God has fixed a limit to His day of grace, as He did for Pharaoh; and once that limit is passed, nothing remains but judgment.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A Real Act, Not a Figure of Speech

Some read the words to mean only that Pharaoh hardened himself while God watched. One writer insists the sealing up is God's own act, and that it comes after a refused testimony:

Man gives himself up to unbelief. Then God may seal that person up in a judicial hardness — at that time or later, as His own wisdom decides. This is a distinct, positive act on God's part. So I hold very firmly that the hardening is not only on man's side. In the judicial sense it is not man's act at all, though it is certainly the result of man's sin. God hardens because man refuses His word... That is how it was with Pharaoh. His case is the model one: the lasting warning in the New Testament, and the first named instance in the Old. At the same time, it is never God who makes a man an unbeliever.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Whole Book Says

Exodus does not tell this one way only. One writer counted every mention of the hardening in the book, and the count answers any one-sided reading:

There are nineteen passages in Exodus before us. All the authorities agree that nine of them trace the hardening of Pharaoh to the will of the LORD... So, to sum up: nine times the hardening of Pharaoh is traced to the Lord. One more speaks of the Egyptians in general. Four times it is traced to Pharaoh himself, and five times the text does not say who did it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Sorry for the Consequences, Not the Sin

Just before this, Pharaoh had admitted his sin and begged for relief. The moment the locusts left, the real man showed again:

Pharaoh's heart now seemed softened, but it really was not. As soon as the plague left, he went back to his stubborn resistance. As predicted, the LORD had hardened his heart. He gives us the classic example of the sinner who defies God. Yet he is quite ready to act humble, if that will help him escape the punishment he deserves. We have to remember this word: "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy" (Prov. 28:13). Under chastening, Pharaoh did not mind a little confessing. But he had no thought of forsaking his self-willed way.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Stubbornness Turned to God's Account

So Pharaoh's stubbornness never defeated God's purpose. It served it:

A creature resisting its Creator! The human will overcoming the divine will! That could not be... Generations not yet born were to hear of the works of the LORD, and of how He stepped in for Israel. They were to know that He is the LORD. Egypt's stubbornness would only help to display the glory of God.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Two Truths Held Together

One writer holds both sides together — God's electing grace and man's own fault — and draws this conclusion:

In the end we may hold this as certain. Those who are saved are saved by grace, through the electing love of God. And those who are lost, in the very place where that grace is at work, are lost by their own fault.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal first. Pharaoh said he did not know the LORD and would not obey Him. Only after that does the text speak of God hardening him. The order carries the answer.

- Then hardening. God's own hand then seals the man up in the hardness he chose. It is a distinct act, and it comes after the refusal.

- Then testing. The locusts left, and his confession vanished with them. He confessed without forsaking, and that is the mark of a heart untouched.

- Then glory. His stubbornness did not defeat God's purpose. It became the story fathers told their children and grandchildren.

- Then the warning. Those saved are saved by grace; those lost, standing in the very place where grace is at work, are lost by their own fault.

Exodus 10:21 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Stretch out thy hand toward the heavens, that there may be darkness in the land of Egypt -- so that one may feel darkness.

The ninth blow against Egypt falls with nothing said in advance: Moses lifts his hand, and a darkness people can feel settles over the land. Why did God choose darkness for the last stroke before death, and what was He saying to a nation that worshipped the sun?

A stroke with no warning

This plague arrives with no message to Pharaoh first. The strange phrase describing the darkness may point to a physical cause, or it may be a picture.

As we see in verse 21, the ninth plague came with no warning at all. Again Moses was to stretch out his hand toward heaven, and a darkness of a supernatural kind fell on Egypt. It is described as "darkness which may be felt." Because of this phrase, some think it was the hot south-west winds that bring great dust storms over Egypt and darken the land. The wind carries tiny particles of sand, so people can feel it. But the phrase may also be a figure of speech. In that case it credits the darkness itself with the groping and feeling around that people do in dense darkness.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

(The ESV renders the phrase "a darkness to be felt.")

Darkness that stopped a nation

Whatever its cause, the effect was total. It held people where they stood and shut down ordinary life.

At the bidding of Jehovah, and without a word of warning, Moses stretched out his hand towards heaven, and at once a darkness that could be felt chained every Egyptian to his place. None moved; all were bound, as it were, in a prison of outer gloom. For three days and nights, though the sun shone on high, and the moon and the stars gave their light, no ray pierced the shroud wrapped about Egypt. The darkness was the prelude to the coming death.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Aimed at Egypt's gods

Egypt worshipped the heavenly bodies, and this plague hid them all.

God sent darkness over the land for three days and nights. It hid the host of heaven from the sight of the worshippers and stopped the services in the temples. We may assume that when it happened, some grand ceremony in honour of the heavenly bodies was about to take place.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The king's own name came from the sun, and it did Egypt no good.

The supernatural darkness of the ninth plague speaks even more solemnly. The ruler who took his name from the sun could do nothing for all the land of Egypt. Meanwhile the light which all the children of Israel had in their homes showed the source of that darkness people could feel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A last call to repent

Three silent days passed while judgment waited. One writer reads that pause as mercy, not delay.

Darkness is the withdrawal of light. It stands for the solemn truth of God forsaking. God was about to abandon Egypt; the darkness was the herald of it… This darkness was God's final appeal to repentance. For three days they were shut in and all business stopped. That awful darkness wrapped every class alike — rich and poor, king and beggar, the learned and the ignorant… God waited, and in that silence and darkness He appealed to their conscience. How slow God is to judge; it is His strange work.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The darkness people choose

The plague also pictures what happens when a heart refuses light.

The last plague, before the final stroke, points to God withdrawing and leaving man to himself. God is light. Where the heart refuses the light, God leaves it to its own darkness. That is a foretaste of the outer darkness which will mark man's eternal banishment from the source of light and blessing.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Choosing that darkness and living in it are not the same.

It is a symbol of the spiritual darkness that unbelief prefers (John 3:19). Men choose that darkness rather than light. But they find it far less pleasant when not the slightest ray of light ever breaks it.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

A line with no twilight

The darkness stopped where Israel lived, and the line between the two peoples was absolute.

This sign of God's displeasure stopped where the Egyptians lived. God's almighty hand drew the dividing line there, and the Hebrews had light in their homes… On one side was darkness about to end in death. On the other was light, the prelude to life and liberty… In the plague there was no shading off between the darkness and the light. As it was then, so it is now: there is no twilight, and everyone is shut up to one side or the other — living in the light, or living in the darkness.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The darkness at the cross

One writer sets this darkness beside the darkness at the cross, and marks the difference.

Jehovah sent darkness as a plague throughout the land of Egypt, while Israel had light in their homes. It lasted three days. No one could see anyone else, and no one got up from his place. At the cross of Christ it told a tale to the ear of faith still more profound. It was not a punishment falling on wicked men. This darkness surrounded the Holy One of God made sin, and God forsaking Him because of sin — our sins laid on Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Withdrawal. The plague came with no warning. It pictures God pulling back His light and leaving man to himself.

- Exposure. It hid the sun, moon and stars Egypt worshipped, shut the temples, and left a king named after the sun powerless.

- Patience. The three dark days were God's last appeal to conscience before death came — He is slow to judge.

- Preference. Unbelief prefers darkness. This plague shows how unbearable that choice becomes when no ray of light ever breaks it.

- Division. Israel had light in their homes; Egypt had none. There is still no twilight — people live in the light or in the darkness.

Exodus 10:22 · Darby

And Moses stretched out his hand toward the heavens; and there was a thick darkness throughout the land of Egypt three days

This is the ninth plague. Moses raises his hand, and darkness covers Egypt for three days — a darkness thick enough to feel. What was it saying to a nation that worshipped the sun, and to a king who would not let Israel go?

Darkness that could be felt

Commentators differ on what "a darkness to be felt" in verse 21 means.

As we see in verse 21, the ninth plague came with no warning. Again Moses was to stretch out his hand toward heaven, and a supernatural darkness fell on Egypt. It is described as "a darkness to be felt." Because of this, some think it was like the hot south-west winds that bring great dust storms over Egypt and darken the land. The wind carries tiny particles of sand, so you can feel it. But the expression may also be figurative. It credits the darkness itself with the feeling about and groping that go on in thick darkness. How it came about need not concern us. It was something supernatural. Of all the plagues this must have been the most terrifying, because it was the strangest and nothing like it had happened before.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

However it came, it struck with no warning and froze the country.

At the command of the LORD, and without a word of warning, Moses stretched out his hand towards heaven. At once a darkness that could be felt chained every Egyptian to his place. None moved; all were bound, as it were, in a prison of outer gloom. For three days and nights the sun shone on high, and the moon and the stars gave their light. Yet no ray pierced the shroud wrapped about Egypt. The darkness was the prelude to the coming death.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Egypt's gods blotted out

Egypt's religion was tied to the sky. This plague struck there.

So far the plagues on the land had not touched the heavenly bodies, which people all over Egypt worshipped. The ninth plague was to blot out the host of heaven from the sight of their worshippers. It was also to stop the main religious ceremonies of the country. The Egyptians aligned their temples to the sun, the moon, or a special star, and they linked their gods to different heavenly bodies.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The man on the throne was no help either.

The supernatural darkness of the ninth plague speaks still more solemnly (Ex. 10:21-29). The king who took his name from the sun was of no use at all for the whole land of Egypt.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The last appeal before the last blow

Three days of darkness came before the last and worst judgment. God used that pause.

Suddenly darkness, which could be felt, came upon Egypt. Pharaoh and all Egypt now learned that their idols were helpless. Darkness is the withdrawal of light. It stands for the solemn truth of being forsaken by God. God was about to abandon Egypt, and the darkness announced it. All Egypt was about to face the severest of all judgments: the death of the firstborn. This darkness was God's final appeal to repentance. For three days they were shut in and all business stopped. Rich and poor, king and beggar, the learned and the ignorant — that awful darkness wrapped them all. God waited, and in that silence and darkness He appealed to their conscience. How slow God is to judge.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

The darkness over the cross

Kelly sets this darkness beside the darkness at the cross. The difference is who it fell on.

Throughout the land of Egypt the LORD had sent darkness as a plague, while Israel had light in their homes. It lasted three days, so that no one could see anyone else, and no one rose from his place. At the cross of Christ it told a far deeper story to the ear of faith. It was not something inflicted on wicked men. This darkness surrounded the Holy One of God made sin, with God forsaking Him because of sin, our sins laid on Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The darkness people choose

The plague also pictures a darkness people choose.

The ninth plague is symbolic of the spiritual darkness that unbelief prefers (John 3:19). But men find it not so pleasant when no ray of light ever breaks it. They deliberately choose darkness rather than light, and later find it is not what they thought it was.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Felt — The darkness was supernatural. It was so thick that every Egyptian stayed frozen where he was. Commentators differ on how it came: a sandstorm, or a picture of groping in total blackness.

- Dethroned — It hid the sun and the stars. Egypt's temples pointed to them, and Egypt's king was named after the sun. None of it helped.

- Withheld — Darkness is light taken away. That pictures being forsaken by God, with the death of the firstborn waiting behind it.

- Patient — Three days of silence were God's last appeal to conscience. He is slow to judge, and that slowness is a warning.

- Chosen — What Egypt suffered, unbelief prefers. People walk into that darkness by choice. At the cross it fell instead on the Holy One, made sin for us.

Exodus 10:23 · Darby

they saw not one another, neither rose any from his place, for three days. But all the children of Israel had light in their dwellings.

For three days a darkness settled on Egypt so heavy that all life stopped. In the homes of Israel it stayed light. Two questions follow. What kind of darkness could do that? And why did it stop at a border no wall marked?

Darkness that could be felt

Why could no one see anyone else? Commentators explain this darkness in two ways.

It is called "a darkness to be felt." Because of these words, some think it was like the hot south-west winds that bring great dust storms over Egypt and darken the land. The wind carries tiny particles of sand, so it can be felt. On the other hand, the words may be a picture. The feeling about and groping in dense darkness is then credited to the darkness itself.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Judgment on the gods of Egypt

Egypt's religion made this plague personal. The nation adored the sun, and for three days its god could do nothing.

Egypt worshipped the sun as the source of light... Suddenly darkness that could be felt came over Egypt. Pharaoh and all Egypt learned now that their idols were helpless. Darkness is the withdrawal of light. It stands for the solemn truth of being forsaken by God... God was about to abandon Egypt; the darkness was the herald of it... This darkness was God's final appeal for repentance. For three days they were shut in and all business stopped. Rich and poor, king and beggar, the learned and the ignorant — that awful darkness wrapped every class.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The light in Israel's homes was itself part of the message. It showed where the darkness had come from.

The ruler who took his name from the sun could do nothing for all the land of Egypt, while the darkness that might be felt was made visible in its source by the light which all the children of Israel had in their homes.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No one rose from his place

Sitting still, unable to see the person beside you, is more than an inconvenience. One writer reads those three days as a picture of what it means to be cut off from God.

Being abandoned by God! Men would indeed like to get away from God here... But even the far-off country is not the hell where men will find the answer to their wish to escape God. In Egypt, for three dreadful days they sat overwhelmed; no one looked at another, or rose from his seat. In that darkness which is the "shadow of death," it says, "they sit." But what will it be when it is not the shadow but death itself, and the eternal flame still gives no light?

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The line God drew

The plague stopped at the border of God's people. Nothing blurred the edge.

This sign of divine displeasure stopped where the Egyptians lived. There God's almighty hand drew the dividing line; the Hebrews had light in their homes... On one side there was darkness about to end in death; on the other there was light, the opening of life and liberty... There was no shading off between the darkness and the light in the plague. As it was then, so it is now. There is no twilight, so everyone is shut up to one or the other — living in the light, or living in the darkness.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The light had nothing to do with the quality of the buildings.

For three days no one could stir. The children of Israel had light in their plain homes, while a blackout deeper than a London night fog covered the ornate temples of Egypt. That points to the spiritual darkness that surrounds man's philosophy. Divine light fills the hearts of the people of God, because God is there.

Modernised from T. OliverOriginal wording

Light in the dwellings now

One writer reads the same contrast as a picture of the believer's place in a dark world.

It is a symbol of the spiritual darkness that unbelief prefers (John 3:19). But men do not find that darkness so pleasant when not the smallest ray of light ever breaks it. They deliberately choose darkness rather than light, and later find it is not what they thought... Of course this was miraculous. But Christians today have spiritual light, while all around them the world is in pitiful darkness.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

In Goshen, the part of Egypt where Israel lived, their homes carried two marks — light first, then the blood of the lamb. In a Christian home, one writer notes, the order runs the other way.

A true Christian household has two essential and distinctive qualities. The house of every Israelite in Goshen had them too, during those terrible days of God's increasing judgments on Egypt. First, it is under the shelter of the blood of the Lamb. Second, it is filled with heavenly light. Only the order is the reverse of what it was for the Israelites, where the light in their homes came before the sprinkling of the blood.

Modernised from Julius A. Von PoseckOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — God sent this darkness as a sign of His displeasure. Commentators differ over whether "felt" points to a sandstorm or pictures men groping in the dark.

- Target — a nation that worshipped the sun found its idols helpless. Taking the light away announced that God was about to abandon Egypt.

- Warning — three days of forced stillness were God's last appeal for repentance before the final blow. They also shadow what it is to be shut out from God forever.

- Line — the darkness stopped at the border of God's people. There was no twilight then, and there is none now.

- Light — Israel's plain houses shone while Egypt's grand temples went dark. Light depends on God being present, not on the building.

Exodus 10:24 · Darby

And Pharaoh called Moses and said, Go, serve Jehovah; only, let your flocks and your herds remain; let your little ones also go with you.

After three days of darkness, Pharaoh makes one more offer: go and worship, take the children, but leave the animals with me. So what is Pharaoh trying to keep here, and why will Moses not leave one animal behind?

The last of the concessions

This offer is the end of a series. Each time the pressure rose, Pharaoh moved his line. One writer traces the retreat step by step:

With what persistence Satan disputed every inch of Israel's way out of the land of Egypt! He first tried to keep them in the land, then to keep them near the land, then to keep part of themselves in the land. Finally, when none of these three worked, he tried to send them out with no ability to serve the Lord. If he could not keep the servants, he would try to keep their ability to serve, which would answer much the same purpose.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What the flocks and herds stand for

The flocks and herds were the people's business. One writer puts Pharaoh's offer in plain modern terms:

That is to say: You may have the children, but leave me the business. For us it suggests this: you and your family may go to heaven, but meanwhile run your business on worldly lines. This is compromise number four. What does Moses say? "Our livestock also must go with us; not a hoof shall be left behind." We are to be for God all round, family and business included. Notice that when they do go, Pharaoh gives up this part too: "Also take your flocks and your herds, as you have said."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Dividing life into sacred and secular

Pharaoh's bargain splits a person in two: the soul goes, the property stays. God's answer refuses that split:

"Leave your possessions," he says; and how many do leave their possessions! They themselves are saved, but their business, their occupation — these are still not sacred things, they are secular. What have these things to do with the salvation of the soul? But God says, No: bring them all out of Egypt — yourselves, your families, your property — all are kept to be Mine.

Modernised from Frederick William GrantOriginal wording

Why not even a hoof

Moses will not negotiate, and the reason is not stubbornness. To agree would have been to admit that Pharaoh had a right to something that belonged to God:

The question was one of leaving Egypt to serve the Lord. He therefore not only claimed the people as His, but also all their possessions. For this reason Moses rejected Pharaoh's title to anything. To have done otherwise would have been to admit his authority at once… The words of Moses hold a principle of the first importance: God claims all that we have, and He claims us as well. We must therefore hold everything at His disposal. He gives, and He asks from us… We must not accept the world's claims on what the Lord has given us. Not a hoof must be left behind, or it might be that very hoof the Lord would ask for sacrifice.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Knowing the claim only outside Egypt

Moses gave another reason for refusing: they did not yet know what the service would need.

"We do not know with what we must serve the LORD until we arrive there." In other words, they had no knowledge of God's claim or their responsibility until they had gone "three days' journey." No one could learn these things in the dense and polluted air of Egypt. You must know redemption as an accomplished fact before you can have any true or full sense of responsibility.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A heart untouched by judgment

This offer comes from a man who wants relief from judgment, not from a changed heart:

Divine judgments do not soften the human heart. Pharaoh called for Moses and said, "Go, serve the LORD; only let your flocks and your herds remain behind." But when Moses rejected these terms, Pharaoh was enraged. He lived in the darkness, and was as dark as it… He would not humble himself. He had piled one godless act on another. He would gladly have spared himself more suffering, but he was set on resisting God's word.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Summary

- All, step by step. The enemy first wanted them in the land, then near it, then part of them in it, and last of all without the means to serve.

- All means possessions. The flocks and herds were their livelihood. Pharaoh's offer means: go to heaven, but run your business on worldly lines.

- All means no split. Business and occupation are not a "secular" zone outside God's claim — God says bring them all out.

- All, or you concede a right. Moses refused Pharaoh any claim at all. The hoof left behind might be the very one the Lord would ask for.

- All is learned outside. No one learns what God's service needs while still in Egypt. Redemption must be a settled fact first.

Exodus 10:25 · Darby

And Moses said, Thou must give also sacrifices and burnt-offerings into our hands, that we may sacrifice to Jehovah our God.

Pharaoh has tried everything else, and now he makes one last offer. The people may go, but their flocks and herds stay behind. Moses refuses. The animals are not goods to trade away; they are the means of sacrifice, and without them Israel has nothing to bring to God.

The last hold Pharaoh tries to keep

Pharaoh had already made three other offers. Each time Moses refused, the king came back with a new one.

With what persistence Satan disputed every inch of Israel's way out of the land of Egypt! He first tried to keep them in the land. Then he tried to keep them near the land. Next he tried to keep part of themselves in the land. When none of these three worked, he tried to send them out without any ability to serve the Lord. If he could not keep the servants, he would try to keep their power to serve. That would achieve much the same end. If he could not persuade them to sacrifice in the land, he would send them out of the land without sacrifices.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why the animals were not negotiable

Moses did not bargain. He answered with God's terms.

As Moses pointed out, this would defeat the whole object of their going out. They would not have the means to sacrifice to the Lord. So he stated God's terms again, as an ultimatum: "Not a hoof shall be left behind." God's purpose was to take His people, and every single thing they had, clean out of Egypt.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the cattle stood for

Why would a few animals matter so much?

This proposal appears innocent enough. It seems like a small matter of giving up a little property. But Moses' answer reveals how subtle and deadly the offer is... He did not regard the cattle as mere property, or as a food supply, since Israel ate manna in the wilderness. He saw them as the sacrificial means of approach to the Lord, and so did Pharaoh. In fact they were so many pictures of Christ. The enemy wants us to go into the wilderness without Christ. That would be miserable. More than that, it would mean certain destruction.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The modern form of the same offer

The same offer still gets made today.

That is to say: You may have the children, but leave me the business. To us it would suggest this — you and your family may go to heaven, but meanwhile run your business on worldly lines. We are to be for God all round, family and business included. It is worth noticing that when they do go, Pharaoh gives up this part too. He says, "Take your flocks and your herds, as you have said."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

God's claim covers everything

Moses' refusal rests on something larger than one argument with a king.

The question was one of leaving Egypt to serve the Lord. So God claimed not only the people as His, but all their possessions too. That is why Moses denied Pharaoh any title to anything. To have done otherwise would have meant admitting his authority... The words of Moses hold a principle of the first importance: God claims all that we have, and He claims us as well. Everything must therefore stay at His disposal. He gives, and He demands from us. David showed this well when he provided materials for the temple: "For all things come from you, and of your own have we given you." As God's people we must not take from the world, just as Abraham refused to be made rich by the king of Sodom. And we must not accept the world's claims on what the Lord has given us. Not a hoof must be left behind, or it might be that very hoof the Lord would ask for sacrifice.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why they could not yet know what God would ask

Moses' reply ends with an admission: Israel does not yet know how it must serve the Lord until it arrives.

The people of God only get a proper sense of His claims when they take their stand on new ground, in simple childlike faith. That is the ground where death and resurrection have set them. So they had no knowledge of God's claim or of their responsibility until they had gone "three days' journey." No one could learn such things in the dense and polluted air of Egypt. You must know redemption as an accomplished fact before you can have any right or full sense of responsibility.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Plot. When the enemy cannot keep the people, he goes after their power to serve.

- Purpose. Israel left Egypt to sacrifice. Take away the sacrifices and the journey loses its point.

- Portion. The flocks were not assets. They were the way to draw near to God, and pictures of Christ.

- Possessions. The claim reaches daily life. Family and business both belong to God, and the world keeps not one hoof.

- Perception. No one learns what God will ask while still in Egypt. So everything travels out first, before He asks.

Exodus 10:26 · Darby

Our cattle also must go with us there shall not a hoof be left behind; for we must take thereof to serve Jehovah our God; and we do not know with what we must serve Jehovah, until we come there.

Plague after plague has worn Pharaoh down. Now he tries one last deal: the people may go and worship, but the flocks and herds stay in Egypt. Moses will not trade a single animal. They cannot yet know what God will ask of them, so a quarrel over cattle becomes a question about who owns a person's whole life.

The enemy's last offer

Pharaoh gave ground step by step, but always kept something back.

The enemy's fourth and last objection is in these words: "And Pharaoh called to Moses and said, Go, serve the Lord; only let your flocks and your herds be kept back; let your little ones also go with you." He would let them go, but without the resources to serve the Lord. If he could not keep them in Egypt, he would send them away crippled and stripped bare.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One writer puts the same offer in modern terms: keep your family for God, but run the business the world's way.

Pharaoh is saying: you may have the children, but leave me the business. To us it would suggest this: you and your family may go to heaven, but in the meantime run your business on worldly lines. This is compromise number four. What does Moses say? "Not a hoof shall be left behind" (Ex. 10:26). We are to be for God all round, family and business included. Notice that when they do go, Pharaoh gives up this point too: "Take also your flocks and your herds, as you have said" (Ex. 12:32).

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why the livestock mattered

Israel were shepherds, so the herds were most of what they had. One writer draws out what Pharaoh's demand became in later teaching.

At the very last, Pharaoh tries another compromise. If he cannot prevent their going out, he will at least make them as poor as he can. Their flocks and herds were the main part of all that they owned as a shepherd people. They are therefore a fitting picture of our possessions — of what we have in the world. These must be left, says Pharaoh. This may be the first attempt to state a teaching that has since spread far among the people of God, sadly. It says we should split the "secular" from the "sacred." It says that even if we ourselves must go on pilgrimage, we need not bring all we own out of Egypt, openly acknowledging God's claim to it.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

"We must take of them"

Moses answers on practical ground. One writer shows what Pharaoh's offer would have cost the journey.

At the end of the three days, when the darkness had gone, Pharaoh was again ready to try a compromise. This time it was: let all the men, women and children go, but your flocks and herds must remain. But as Moses pointed out, this would defeat the whole point of going out. They would not have the means to sacrifice to the Lord. He stated God's terms again, as an ultimatum: "not a hoof shall be left behind." God's purpose was to take His people, and every single thing they had, right out of Egypt.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Not knowing until they arrive

The second half of the verse admits ignorance — they cannot yet tell what God will require. That is exactly why nothing can be surrendered in advance.

The question was one of leaving Egypt to serve the Lord. He therefore claimed not only the people as His, but all their possessions too. So Moses refused Pharaoh any claim at all. To do otherwise would have been to acknowledge his authority… There lies in the words of Moses a principle of the first importance — that God claims all that we have as well as ourselves. So we must hold everything at His disposal. He gives, and He demands from us… Not a hoof must be left behind, or it might be that very hoof the Lord would demand for sacrifice.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Moses ties this knowledge to a place — "until we arrive there." Why could it not be learned in Egypt?

"We do not know with what we must serve the Lord until we arrive there." That is, they knew nothing of God's claim or their responsibility until they had gone "three days' journey." No one could learn these things in the thick and polluted air of Egypt. We must know redemption as a settled fact before we can have any right or full sense of responsibility.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Offer — Pharaoh's last deal was to free the people but keep their wealth. If he could not keep them, he would send them out crippled and stripped bare.

- Refusal — Moses gave up nothing. The flocks stood for everything Israel owned, and Pharaoh's terms were the first draft of splitting life into "sacred" and "secular."

- Reason — the herds were the raw material of sacrifice. Leaving them would have destroyed the whole purpose of going out.

- Reach — God's claim covers what we own as well as who we are. Any hoof left behind might be the very one He would demand.

- Result — we learn what God asks only outside Egypt. Redemption must be a settled fact before we can feel our responsibility.

Exodus 10:27 · Darby

But Jehovah made Pharaoh's heart stubborn, and he would not let them go.

Egypt has just come through three days of darkness, and Pharaoh offers one last deal: the people may go, but the animals stay. Moses refuses, and this verse puts that refusal in God's hands — so how is Pharaoh to blame?

The last compromise

One writer reads the three days of darkness as God's last appeal. Moses' answer ended the bargaining:

This darkness was God's final appeal to repentance. For three days they stayed shut in, and all business stopped. That awful darkness covered every class: rich and poor, king and beggar, the learned and the ignorant. The suspense must have been frightful. What was to come next? God waited, and in that silence and darkness appealed to their conscience. How slow God is to judge; it is His strange work. In infinite patience He waited before He dealt the final blow to Egypt. Pharaoh made his last objection and compromise in verse 24, but Moses answered, "Not a hoof shall be left behind."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What the hardening means

This phrase comes up again and again in these chapters. One commentator refuses to soften it. He traces what follows when a man resists God's testimony:

There is no need at all for anyone to try to avoid the full, plain sense of this most solemn statement. If a man resists the light of divine testimony, he is left with nothing but judicial blindness and hardness of heart. God leaves him to himself, and then Satan comes in and carries him headlong to ruin. There was plenty of light for Pharaoh. It was enough to show him the extravagant folly of his course. He was trying to hold back people God had commanded him to let go. But his heart was really set on acting against God. So God left him to himself, and made him a monument for the display of His glory "through all the earth."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Order matters

The hardening is not where Pharaoh's story begins. It follows testimony already given and already thrown away:

Unbelief never begins as the result of God's judicial hardening. But let there be no doubt that there is such a thing as hardening. Two mistakes are equally wrong. One says this hardening comes before God gives His first testimony to men. The other denies God's righteous right, as sovereign, to harden a man after he refuses that testimony.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

God struck, then lifted the blow. Neither move changed Pharaoh:

Pharaoh hardens his heart in more than one way. He refuses to bow under the plagues. He also keeps on in his course after God answers his cry and lifts the plague. God's severity in sending the plague has no effect on him. Neither does God's goodness in taking it away. Nothing moves a heart set on doing evil.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Both statements stand

Exodus does not name just one actor behind the hardening. One writer counted the instances:

To sum up: nine instances attribute the hardening of Pharaoh to the Lord. One more speaks of the Egyptians in general. Four attribute it to Pharaoh himself, and five do not say who did it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Not Pharaoh only

The same writer names other cases of this hardening, and marks what always comes first:

There are five outstanding instances of this solemn hardening on God's part: the Gentile world (Romans 1:28), Pharaoh or Egypt (Exodus 9:12), the kings of Canaan (Joshua 11:20), Israel (Isaiah 6), and Christendom (2 Thessalonians 2). This hardening comes before destruction. But it follows much patience on God's part. It comes only after man's incurable unbelief and stubborn refusal to accept God's testimony.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Resistance that served God

The refusal did not slow God down. It gave Him room:

Our chapter closes with Pharaoh brushing aside everything that had been said. Here, for the second-to-last time, we read of the Lord hardening his heart. His stubbornness, however, would only give further occasion for God to multiply His wonders in the land of Egypt.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Where it ended

Pharaoh's rage in the next verses threatened Moses with death. The outcome reversed it:

Moses answers him with words of solemn weight: "As you say! I will not see your face again." But it was not Moses who died. It was Pharaoh, a victim of his own folly.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Light first. God sent plague after plague, then three days of darkness, to appeal to Pharaoh's conscience — all before any word of hardening.

- Refusal next. Neither God's severity in sending the plague nor His goodness in removing it moved a heart set on evil.

- Hardening after. Hardening follows refused testimony — for Pharaoh, and for the other cases Scripture names. It never comes first, and it never creates unbelief.

- Both true. Exodus credits the hardening nine times to the Lord and four times to Pharaoh. God's right to harden and Pharaoh's own guilt both stand.

- Glory last. Pharaoh's stubbornness only multiplied God's wonders. The king who threatened Moses with death died himself.

Exodus 10:28 · Darby

And Pharaoh said to him, Get thee from me, take heed to thyself, see my face no more; for in the day thou seest my face thou shalt die.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Exodus 10:29 · Darby

And Moses said, Thou hast spoken rightly I will see thy face again no more!

These few words are the last Moses ever speaks to Pharaoh's face. They sound like simple agreement with a threat, but commentators read them as the moment talks end and judgment begins.

The negotiations break off

Pharaoh had offered to let the people go, but without their animals. One writer explains why Moses refused.

Pharaoh called for Moses and told the Israelites to leave with their wives and their little ones, but they had to leave their flocks and herds behind. Moses could not agree: all must go, not a hoof must be left behind — it was God's redemption.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Older translations render Moses' reply as "You have spoken well." Another writer sees the talks collapse here, and hears in his answer a prediction of who would really die.

Moses would not compromise on this point, and that plainly angered Pharaoh. His heart was still hardened by the Lord, so he broke off all negotiation here. God had presented His ultimatum. Pharaoh rejected it and threatened to kill Moses, who had brought it to him. In reply to that threat Moses spoke as a prophet, and foretold Pharaoh's doom in a veiled way. It was not Moses who was about to die, but first Pharaoh's firstborn and then Pharaoh himself.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A man no longer afraid

Moses had once been hesitant and timid. Now a king promises to kill him if he shows his face again.

Pharaoh had used his royal power harshly and as he pleased, and had no doubt condemned others to death. Now he warns Moses, "…take care never to see my face again, for on the day you see my face you shall die." But Moses is unafraid. His earlier hesitation and timidity are gone. He is in intelligent communion with the mind of God, whose servant he is, and his calm, dignified manner matches the solemnity of the occasion. In Hebrews 11 Moses is named among that famous group of witnesses whose lives gave such convincing proof of the power of faith: "By faith he left Egypt, not being afraid of the anger of the king, for he endured as seeing him who is invisible."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Faith leaving the world behind

The New Testament looks back on this scene as an act of faith. Hebrews 11:27 says Moses "left Egypt, not being afraid of the anger of the king." One writer places that moment here, and applies it to our own day.

Here Moses deliberately leaves Egypt behind. He will work with it patiently no longer; he gives it up to the judgment of God. Pharaoh and his armies were soon drowned in the Red Sea… And today the world is no longer on probation, as though God were working with it to change its attitude. It stands under a definite sentence of judgment that nothing can turn aside. So faith leaves the world behind, and gives it up to the judgment it has earned by its rebellion against God.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The last message

Ending the interview did not end the errand. Moses still had one warning to deliver.

Pharaoh had declared that Moses would die if he dared to see his face again. Moses replied, "As you say! I will not see your face again." Then he went on: "Thus says the LORD: About midnight I will go out in the midst of Egypt, and every firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh who sits on his throne, even to the firstborn of the slave girl who is behind the handmill."… And then, in great anger, Moses left the king.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The warning about the firstborn is recorded in the next chapter. The same writer suggests how the two scenes fit together.

This is in Ex. 10:29; but in Ex. 11:4-8 it is clear that Moses told Pharaoh of the death of the firstborn, which may have been on the same occasion by a message direct from God.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Pharaoh's last summons

Pharaoh later sent for the men he had banished. Even then, Moses' words held.

Pharaoh called for Moses and Aaron. No doubt he did not actually see them (Ex. 10:29), but gave them the urgent message that Israel was to get out of Egypt. This was not only permission given, but a command that would allow no delay.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal. Pharaoh's last offer held back Israel's flocks. Moses would not bend, so the king ended the talks with a threat of death.

- Rupture. Moses simply agreed. God had given His terms, Pharaoh had rejected them, and nothing was left to discuss.

- Reversal. The threat rebounded. The one who said "you shall die" lost his firstborn, and then his life in the Red Sea.

- Resolve. The man who once hesitated now answers a king without fear, delivers God's final warning, and walks out.

- Renunciation. Hebrews 11:27 calls this faith leaving Egypt. Writers apply it to anyone who stops trying to reform the world and leaves it to God's judgment.

Exodus 11:1 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Yet one plague will I bring upon Pharaoh, and upon Egypt; afterwards he will let you go hence when he shall let [you] go altogether, he shall utterly drive you out hence.

After nine plagues, Pharaoh still will not let Israel go. God now tells Moses that one blow is left, and that it will do more than open the door: Egypt will push Israel out, and not empty-handed.

The last blow

The king has held out so far.

One more heavy blow must fall on this hard-hearted king and his land. Nothing less will force him to let go the people the Lord had favoured in His sovereign grace.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

This last stroke would differ from the nine before it.

In the nine earlier plagues God used things He had created, and punished Egypt through them. But now He, the Creator, was going to step in personally: "About midnight I will go out in the midst of Egypt."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

When these words were spoken

Read straight through, the chapter seems to place these words after Pharaoh's last angry threat. Writers point out that the order is not that simple.

The Lord gave this warning before Pharaoh made his final threat to Moses. Verses 1-3 form a parenthesis, and verse 1 should read, "And the Lord had said to Moses" (Numerical Bible). These three verses record what the Lord had already said to Moses. He assures Moses that He will bring only one more plague on Egypt. Then Pharaoh would not only let them go, but would drive them out.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Why nine were not enough

The plagues did not soften Pharaoh. They showed what was already in him.

God's chastening hand lay heavy on the land. Each new blow bore witness to His irresistible might and majesty. Pharaoh's small hand could not stop those acts of divine power or lessen them in any degree. So he pretends to agree to God's repeated requests to let His people go. But he takes it back whenever relief comes. This shows his heart to be as stubborn and unbending as at the start.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

This is what happens when a person keeps refusing the light God gives him.

If a man resists the light of divine testimony, he is shut up to judicial blindness and hardness of heart. God leaves him to himself, and then Satan comes in and carries him headlong to ruin. There was plenty of light for Pharaoh. It showed him the extreme folly of trying to hold back those whom God had commanded him to let go. But the real bent of his heart was to act against God, and so God left him to himself.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Let go — and driven out

Egypt's attitude to Israel would turn right around.

The Egyptians, at first so eager to keep them, were at last, after their punishment, just as anxious to be rid of them. "When he lets you go, he will drive you away completely." "They were thrust out of Egypt and could not wait."

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Why not let Israel stay in Egypt as a free people?

There was no meeting-place in Egypt for the Lord and His redeemed people. For them, redemption and separation from Egypt were one and the same thing. God had said, "I have come down to deliver them," and nothing short of this could either satisfy or glorify Him. A salvation that would have left them still in Egypt could not possibly be God's salvation.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Not going out empty

The same message that announces the last plague tells Israel to ask their Egyptian neighbours for silver and gold. Some older translations call this borrowing.

In truth their wages were long overdue, and had never been paid. It is mere folly to think there was any breach, even the smallest, of what was right and fitting… They were to plunder their oppressors by divine authority. There was no question at all of deceit or dishonesty. The impression of "borrowing" given in the Authorised Version is not needed at all, and the context does not justify it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Patience ends. Nine plagues gave Pharaoh room to change his mind. "One plague more" is where the warnings end and the final blow falls.

- Hardening exposed. Pharaoh gave in while the pressure held and broke his word as soon as it eased. God left him to the real bent of his own heart.

- God Himself acts. The earlier plagues used created things; the last one brings the Creator into Egypt in person.

- Driven out. Egypt once clung to Israel. Now it would drive them out completely.

- Out, and not empty. God's own authority settled wages long unpaid. The freed slaves walked out loaded with silver and gold.

Exodus 11:2 · Darby

Speak now in the ears of the people, that they ask every man of his neighbour, and every woman of her neighbour, utensils of silver and utensils of gold.

This command comes just before the final plague: slaves are to ask their Egyptian neighbours for silver and gold. Two questions follow: was this honest, and why would God care about jewellery on the eve of a rescue?

"Ask," not "borrow"

Older English versions used the word "borrow," and critics have built a charge of dishonesty on it. Commentators answer that the charge rests on a translation, not on the text.

Unbelievers have seized on the word "borrow" in Exodus 3:22. They object that it presents God as telling the people to practise deceit, pretending to borrow what they never intended to repay. The word occurs again in Exodus 11:2 and Exodus 12:35. But the word really is "ask," and is translated that way in Darby's version. The people had been only slaves, working for a bare living. Now the whole position would turn round: their former masters would fear them and give them what they asked. All they could carry out of Egypt would be a mere fraction of what was really due to them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Others put the same point in one line, refusing even to treat it as a difficulty needing defence.

Ex. 11:2, 35, 36. — The real meaning is not "borrow," but "ask." There is no need to explain or apologise. Deceit did not exist. They asked, and the Egyptians gave.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Wages finally paid

This was not a favour begged. It was payment for centuries of unpaid labour.

It may help first to point out that the word rendered "borrowed" really means to "ask," and the word rendered "lent" means "gave." The concordance will show that it really means "demanded." The children of Israel had served the Egyptians for 400 years, building the treasure cities for Pharaoh (Ex. 1:11). So God had already told Moses that they were to demand these things as payment for their work (Ex. 3:21-22). It was not more than they had a right to, and it seems the Egyptians knew this. That would explain how eagerly they answered this demand. It was "spoil," but spoil they richly deserved.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Hearts already prepared

The command works because God had already changed how Egypt saw Israel.

So God prepared Moses for this "one plague more," which was very soon to fall. It was to be of such a kind that panic-stricken Pharaoh would not merely let them go but would hurry to thrust them out. So he was to tell the people, both men and women, to ask their Egyptian neighbours for "jewels," or vessels, of gold and silver. By this time fear and respect filled Egyptian hearts, and Moses himself had become very great in their eyes. So they freely gave everything the people asked for. The acts of God often impress humbler, simpler people while the great ones of the earth see nothing.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A promise kept, and a use planned

This wealth answered a promise God made to Abraham long before. It also paid for the tabernacle, the tent of worship Israel would later build.

When God told Abram that his descendants would suffer in Egypt for four hundred years (Gen. 15), He said, "Afterward they shall come out with great substance." Where would they have got all the material for the tabernacle, if they had not had "great substance"? They could receive it all from the Lord, and the best thing we can do with what He gives us is to give it back to Him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

One writer traces the same wealth into two very different chapters.

God had specially intended the wealth Israel took out of Egypt for His service in the Tabernacle. There was a right use for it. God's claim rested on the wealth that went out of the land with them. The abuse of it comes out clearly in chapter 32, where the golden calf came before the dancing.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What the world would lose

One writer reads this scene as a picture of the world today.

But God does not intend His people to go out of Egypt empty. They are to leave it rather with the spoil of Egypt in their hands; and yet, in taking this, they take only what is their own. Take out of the world today all that comes from God's saving work, or goes with it. Take out all that Scripture has enriched it with. How poor it would be left!

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Asked — the verb is "ask," not "borrow"; there was no pretence of repayment and so no deceit to defend.

- Earned — they asked for unpaid wages: four centuries of forced labour. The Egyptians seem to have known it.

- Given — Israel seized nothing. God turned Egyptian fear into willingness and made Moses great in their eyes.

- Promised — the "great substance" God spoke of to Abraham arrived here, and no one left empty.

- Devoted — the gold had a purpose: it built the tabernacle. The golden calf shows what happens when people turn God's gift to other use.

Exodus 11:3 · Darby

And Jehovah gave the people favour in the eyes of the Egyptians. Moreover the man Moses was very great in the land of Egypt -- in the eyes of Pharaoh's bondmen, and in the eyes of the people.

Just before the last plague, God tells Moses two surprising things about Egypt. The nation that had enslaved Israel now looks on them kindly, and Egypt holds Moses himself in high honour. Both come from the same hand that was about to strike the land.

Where the Verse Sits

One writer reads these opening lines as a look back at what God had already told Moses. On this view God did both things Himself: He made the Egyptians willing, and He raised Moses in their eyes.

Verses 1-3 form a parenthesis, and verse 1 should read, "And the Lord had said to Moses"... So Moses was told to tell the Israelites to ask (not borrow) their Egyptian neighbours for jewels of silver and gold. Israel had certainly earned this by their long years of slavery, and the Lord made the Egyptians willing to give the Israelites what they asked for. On top of this, the Lord had made Moses highly respected among Pharaoh's servants and among the people (v. 3).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Favour, Not Theft

Some readers use the old translation "borrow" to accuse God of backing a swindle. Commentators answer that the word means only "to ask," and that Israel was asking for what it was already owed.

"And I will give this people favor in the sight of the Egyptians, and when you go, you shall not go empty." Their wages had been owed for a long time and had never been paid. It is foolish to suppose there was even the smallest breach of what was right and fitting... They were to plunder their oppressors by God's own authority, and there was no question at all of deceit or dishonesty. The Authorized Version gives the impression of "borrowing," but nothing requires that impression, and the context does not support it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That wealth was not just back pay to spend as they liked. God had already marked it for a purpose.

God had set apart the wealth that Israel took out of Egypt for His own service in the tabernacle. It had a proper use, and God's claim rested on the wealth that came out of the land with them.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What Pharaoh Missed

Verse 3 names two groups who honoured Moses: Pharaoh's officials and the ordinary people. The king is missing from that list.

By now fear and respect had taken hold of their hearts, and Moses himself had become very great in their eyes. So they gladly handed over everything they were asked for. It often happens that humbler, simpler people are struck by the acts of God while the great ones of the earth see nothing.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Standing Witness Against Pharaoh

The standing of Moses in Egypt also counts as evidence against the king. God was working out His own purpose. Even so, Pharaoh had warning after warning from inside his own household, and this verse is the last.

Yet the king of Egypt was responsible, and his own people and the nations around him were witnesses. First, Exodus 8:19: "Then the magicians said to Pharaoh, 'This is the finger of God.'" Second, Exodus 9:20: "Then whoever feared the word of the LORD among the servants of Pharaoh hurried his slaves and his livestock into the houses." Third, Exodus 10:7: "Pharaoh's servants said to him, 'How long shall this man be a snare to us? Let the men go, that they may serve the LORD their God.'" Fourth, Exodus 11:3: "Moreover, the man Moses was very great in the land of Egypt..."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Great Outside, Lowly Inside

Scripture gives a second verdict on the same man. Side by side, the two show what forty years of God's training had done in him.

Envy might have found a place in Joshua's heart, but it had no place in the heart of Moses. The desire to be first, which is so deeply rooted in the natural human mind, had no place with him... At 40 he was not very meek, as Exodus 2:12 shows. Now, after 40 years of God's discipline in Midian, he is "very meek," though in the eyes of the world he had become "very great" (Ex. 11:3).

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Moses Writing About Himself

Critics argue that no man writes down his own praise, so a later editor must have added the line to Moses' five books. One writer answers that the objection would only hold if the Bible were a human book.

If the Bible were a human book, texts like Exodus 11:3 and Numbers 12:7 might seem strange. But the history proves they are strictly true, and what Paul says in 2 Corinthians 11 may make one hesitate before treating them as later additions by Ezra or some other approved hand... None of this touches in the slightest the claim that Moses himself wrote those five books by inspiration.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Timing. Verses 1-3 look back at what God had already told Moses, before He announced the last plague.

- Wages. Israel asked for the silver and gold; they did not borrow it. Years of unpaid slavery had earned it, and nothing about it was dishonest.

- Favour. God Himself turned the hearts of the Egyptians, and He later claimed what Israel carried out for the tabernacle.

- Greatness. Ordinary Egyptians and Pharaoh's own officials respected Moses. The king stayed blind, so he had no excuse.

- Meekness. Scripture calls the same man "very great" in Egypt and "very meek" in the wilderness. God's training had already taken the love of being first out of him.

Exodus 11:4 · Darby

And Moses said, Thus saith Jehovah About midnight I will go out into the midst of Egypt.

Moses stands before Pharaoh for the last time. The message is not his own; it opens with "Thus says the LORD." Nine plagues have come through wind, water, insects and disease. Now God says He Himself will come out at midnight, and Egypt's firstborn will die.

A last word before the blow

Pharaoh had already hardened himself against every sign. Even so, God sent a warning before He struck.

Yet God would not strike, without a warning word, even those who had hardened their necks against Him. Moses brings this last and final testimony to Pharaoh in these words — "Thus says the LORD: About midnight I will go out in the midst of Egypt... and all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die." That voice spoke to Pharaoh for the last time, and it was never heard again.

Modernised from F. G. PattersonOriginal wording

God Himself goes out

The words "I will go out" mark a change. Until now God had struck through created things.

What he announced was an act of God. In its character and its severity, it was lifted far above everything that had gone before. In the nine plagues before this, God had used things of His own creation as the means of punishment. But now He, the Creator, was going to step in personally: "About midnight I will go out in the midst of Egypt."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why only the firstborn died

If a holy God comes down among sinners, death must follow. Yet He struck only the firstborn, and that limit shows mercy.

Now if the holy and righteous God comes down like this among His fallen and sinful creatures, there can be only one result. The death penalty must fall, for "the wages of sin is death." Yet even here God shows His mercy. Death was not to fall on all the Egyptians, but only on the firstborn of both man and beast... In a family tree, the outermost twigs show the firstborn sons of the various branches of the family. Using that picture, we may say that God was about to cut off all the young twigs. That was a sign that His sentence of death rested on the trees, though He would not cut down every tree at that moment.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Midnight — the hour when no one is watching

God named the hour ahead of time. Midnight is when people sleep and feel safest.

"So Moses said, 'Thus says the LORD: About midnight I will go out in the midst of Egypt.'" When everyone was asleep and felt safe, the judgment would fall... Signs and wonders had produced no repentance of heart. Pharaoh had hardened himself still more. Threats of judgment did no good... Supper-time was the time to hear and to act. When midnight came, the blow had fallen, and then it was too late.

Modernised from F. G. PattersonOriginal wording

The firstborn: God's claim and man's pride

The choice of the firstborn was not random. One answer rests on God's own claim; the other on what Egypt was proud of.

Why the firstborn? Because they are those who ought to be devoted to the Lord, since He is the Creator and the best is rightly His (Ex. 13:1-2). But Egypt had kept on rejecting God's claims about Israel, whom He called His "firstborn" (Ex. 4:22-23). Now Pharaoh would lose his own firstborn.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The firstborn was the chief of their strength, all that man would glory in, the fulfilment of his hopes and desires... Egypt stands for the world in its opposition to God, and Pharaoh for its god and its prince. So it is of the greatest importance for the children of God to realise that all that man glories in lies under the judgment of God. Death is on everything here. All is shut up under death.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Israel's firstborn and the lamb

Nothing here exempts Israel. Their firstborn lived because another death took their place.

The Lord passed through the land of Egypt with the sword of justice drawn, to strike all the firstborn. Israel's firstborn would not have escaped either, if the sword had not fallen on the neck of the spotless victim instead. As someone has well said, "There was death in every house, not only in the houses of the Egyptians, but also in those of the Israelites. In the Egyptian houses it was the death of Egypt's firstborn; in the Israelite houses, the death of God's LAMB."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned. God announced the blow before He struck. Pharaoh heard that voice for the last time.

- Personal. The earlier plagues came through created things. Here the Creator says He will step in Himself.

- Measured. Only the firstborn fell. God cut the young twigs and left the trees standing for the moment, but His sentence of death rested on the whole tree.

- Timed. Midnight was the hour of sleep and false safety. Supper-time was the time to act; after that it was too late.

- Answered. Israel's firstborn deserved the same sword. There was death in every house that night: in Egypt's, the firstborn; in Israel's, the lamb.

Exodus 11:5 · Darby

And all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh who sitteth on his throne, even unto the firstborn of the bondwoman that is behind the mill; and all the firstborn of cattle.

God's final warning to Pharaoh sets the exact reach of the coming blow. It spares no rank, from the palace to the mill. Two questions follow: why the firstborn, and why no house in Egypt escapes.

Why the Firstborn

The blow answers a claim Egypt had already refused. God called Israel His firstborn son, and Egypt would not give him up.

From verse 4 to 8 Moses gives Pharaoh his final warning, as directly from the Lord's lips. God had spoken. At about midnight He would step into the middle of Egypt's family life. Every firstborn in the land of Egypt would die: the firstborn of Pharaoh, the firstborn of the lowest of the people, and the firstborn of the animals too. Why the firstborn? Because they are those who ought to be devoted to the Lord, since He is the Creator and the best is rightly His (Ex. 13:1-2). But Egypt had kept on rejecting God's claim to Israel, whom He called His "firstborn" (Ex. 4:22-23). Now Pharaoh would lose his own firstborn.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The Chief of Their Strength

The firstborn was not just the eldest child. He stood for the strength and hope of the household, so the blow fell where Egypt's confidence lived.

God made Egypt realise what it meant to be under His unsparing judgment. He "struck down the firstborn of Egypt" (Ps. 136:10). The firstborn was the chief of their strength, all that man would glory in; the gratification of his hopes and desires. By human standards the firstborn stood for dignity and strength at their best. God struck them all — "every firstborn in Egypt, the firstfruits of their strength" (Ps. 78:51). Egypt stands for the world in its opposition to God. Pharaoh is its god and its prince, and his spirit drives those he rules — not by right, but because he seized the place. So the children of God need above all to realise this: everything man glories in lies under the judgment of God. Death is on everything here; all is shut up under death.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

From Throne to Mill

The sentence runs from the king's heir to the slave woman's child. One writer reads that span as the measure of man's ruin — including the ruin of people known for their kindness.

Our Saviour God deals with man by bringing in the light. That light shows up his ruin even in the best circumstances, from the throne down to the firstborn of the female slave behind the mill. God's love for mankind sees the people who spend their lives helping others as perhaps the ones who most of all need His saving love. Their own good nature and kindness blind them to their sins.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The blow was measured, not random — and that is what spread the grief to every house.

The mortality would be great, yet special. Only one in each house should die, yet not one house should be without a dead body on that eventful night. The destroying angel would strike with his death-bearing dart the firstborn of each Egyptian family, from the palace to the mill and the dungeon. Who could comfort mourners when all alike were grief stricken? Sorrow would fill every house across the land, and one desire would take hold of everyone: Israel must go.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

God Himself Comes Down

The earlier judgments came through instruments and agents. This last one comes from God Himself.

Every judgment so far had made it more solemn to have to do with God as Judge. This last one deepens that solemnity beyond measure, because God deals with the ruler and the people of Egypt Himself. He sets every instrument and agent aside. Verse 4 says: "Thus says the LORD: About midnight I will go out in the midst of Egypt, and every firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The One Difference

If the sentence covers throne and mill alike, nothing in Israel's own character set them apart. The next verses say the Lord makes a distinction between Egypt and Israel. One writer says that difference lay outside the people themselves.

In the eleventh chapter you find God saying, "every firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die" (Ex. 11:5), and then "that the LORD makes a distinction between Egypt and Israel" (Ex. 11:7). What was the difference? Were they not all sinners alike? Yes. The difference was this: the blood of the lamb sheltered Israel but not the Egyptians — the world.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Claim. God called Israel His firstborn son. Egypt refused to give him up, so the price fell on Egypt's own firstborn.

- Strength. The firstborn stood for the best a household could produce — so the blow landed on everything man glories in.

- Reach. Throne, mill and dungeon are one list: no rank and no reputation for goodness places anyone outside the sentence.

- Nearness. Every instrument is set aside — God Himself goes out through Egypt, and that makes this judgment more solemn than any before it.

- Shelter. The line drawn that night was not between good people and bad, but between houses under the blood of the lamb and houses without it.

Exodus 11:6 · Darby

And there shall be a great cry throughout the land of Egypt, such as there hath been none like it, nor shall be like it any more.

Moses stands before Pharaoh for the last time. He announces a sound Egypt has never heard: a cry of grief across the whole land. Why would God let a nation wail at midnight? And what makes this sorrow one of a kind?

The final stroke

The cry belongs to the last of the plagues. The chapter opens by announcing it.

"One plague more!" A solemn word! It signed the death warrant of Egypt's firstborn.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One man's defiance

The whole nation weeps, but the resistance behind it belonged to the king alone. He knew what his refusal would cost, and chose it anyway.

Pharaoh, by his stubborn resistance to the will of the Lord, had brought this grief and misery on his subjects. With pride, and again and again, the great ruler had defied the Almighty of the heavens, saying, "Not Your will, but mine be done." He refused to free Israel, the firstborn of God, from slavery. He knew full well the dreadful alternative for the firstborn of Egypt, and he dared it anyway. So through man's stubborn self-will, the hope and promise of a mighty nation died in that night of weeping.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

A grief with no equal

What makes this cry unlike any other is not the number of deaths but their spread. One death per house, and no house left out — which meant no neighbour left able to console.

The death toll would be great, yet specific. Only one in each house would die, yet not one house would be without a dead body on that momentous night... Who could comfort the mourners when all alike were struck with grief? They had known a darkness that could be felt. Now all joy in every house across the land would go dark; a shared sorrow would fill Egypt. Then one desire would grip them all: Israel must leave. They would urgently beg the Israelites to go.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why it was heard, not just felt

Why did the judgment sound like a cry? Mourning in Egypt was loud and public.

The customs of the country intensified the misery. Even today a "great cry" goes up in parts of Egypt when death enters a house. Friends of the family take up the wail, and the still air carries the loud laments far off. In those old days, when death entered a house, the family would rush into the streets, throw dust on their heads and beat their breasts as they cried out. Friends and relatives joined the sad crowd, and professional mourners added their shrill screams. No one needed such services on the midnight of the Passover, even if someone had offered them. Grief and terror, all too real, were in every house and filled every street... In the night of the great cry in Egypt the wail that filled the land was for the firstborn: "Alas, my firstborn! Alas, my firstborn!"

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

A cry that came too late

The timing matters. Egypt does not cry out while there is still time to act. The crying starts once the blow has landed.

A cry when the blow had fallen. Signs and wonders had produced no repentance of heart: Pharaoh had hardened himself still more. Threats of judgment did no good... The evening was the time to hear and to act; when midnight came the blow had fallen, and then it was too late. The person who put it off might plead how well he understood the plan of rescue; but he had folded his arms and judgment had overtaken him.

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

A difference put, not found

Israel would be exempt from this cry. But the exemption was granted, not earned.

But again there would be exemption for the Israelites, for the Lord was going to put a difference between them and the Egyptians. There was no basic difference between them; had there been, it would not have been necessary for the Lord to put a difference... The Israelites were sinners as the Egyptians were, and equally under the death sentence, and God shows no partiality. So if God puts a difference, it must be done in a righteous way.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Death in every house

How was that difference made righteous? Death came to every home in Egypt that night. The only question was who bore it.

The firstborn was dead in every unsheltered house: the Lamb in every house sheltered by its blood! Judgment had been passed on all; the Lamb had borne it for the people of God. Egypt had borne it for themselves. Each was final, and the outcome never changed.

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned — God announced the plague in advance. Pharaoh knew the cost and chose it for his own people.

- Unequalled — one death per house, no house exempt, and therefore no one left to comfort anyone.

- Late — Egypt's cry rose after the blow, not before; the time to act was the evening, not midnight.

- Difference — Israel escaped because God put a difference, not because one nation was better than the other.

- Shelter — every house had a death that night: the firstborn without the blood, the lamb within it.

Exodus 11:7 · Darby

But against any of the children of Israel shall not a dog move his tongue, against man or beast; that ye may know that Jehovah distinguisheth between the Egyptians and Israel.

The last plague is coming, and with it God draws a line: death will reach every Egyptian home, while in Israel not even a dog will growl. The verse gives the reason — so that everyone would know that the Lord Himself makes the distinction — which raises the question of how God can spare one house and strike the next.

Who Draws the Line

This line is God's to draw, not ours. And the difference He draws has nothing to do with looks or character.

It is the Lord alone who can "put a difference" between those who are His and those who are not. It is not our place to say to anyone, "Stand by yourself, I am holier than you" — that is the language of a Pharisee. But when God puts a difference, we must ask what that difference is. Here we see that it is a simple question of life or death. This is God's grand "difference." He draws a line. On one side of the line is "life," on the other "death." Many of Egypt's firstborn might have been as fair and attractive as those of Israel, and far more so. But Israel had life and light, founded on God's purposes of redeeming love and established by the blood of the lamb.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

No Difference To Begin With

If God has to put a difference, then no difference was there to begin with.

But again there would be exemption for the Israelites, for the Lord was going to put a difference between them and the Egyptians. There was no basic difference between them. If there had been, the Lord would not have needed to put a difference. Here, then, we have a picture in advance of the "no difference" teaching of Romans 3:22-23. The Israelites were sinners just as the Egyptians were. They were under the same death sentence, and God shows no partiality. So if God puts a difference, He must do it in a righteous way.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Problem This Verse Creates

So how can God spare one guilty people while He destroys another?

True, it was His purpose to redeem Israel out of Egypt. It is also quite true that by His own sovereign rights He can make a difference between the one and the other. But God can never cease to be God, and all His actions must express what He is in some aspect or character. Israel were just as guilty as the Egyptians. Both alike were sinners. So if He spares Israel while He destroys Egypt, He can only do it in a way that agrees with His own nature. In other words, His righteousness must show as fully in saving the one as in destroying the other.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Ground Of The Difference

So on what ground could God make that distinction?

God had declared in Exodus 11:7, "that you may know that the LORD makes a distinction between Egypt and Israel." God could show His righteousness in making this distinction. It rested on no moral superiority of Israel over the Egyptians, but only on redemption by blood.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Not A Dog Moving Its Tongue

Inside those houses that night there was a calm of a particular kind.

The calm peace in the houses of the Israelites was like a calm before a storm, for they were waiting for the judgment to break out. It was also like the calm that comes from knowing the storm would not break on their heads. But it was more. It was the peaceful calm that only confidence in God's word can give. It assures the one who receives it that he is safe from the coming judgment.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Later enemies had to learn the same lesson.

Pharaoh could not harm the people of God when he had them as slaves in his own land. So how could Balak or Balaam expect to touch them when they were free and under God's care and protection? No one was able to curse or defy those whom God had not cursed or denounced.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Where The Line Runs Now

The line God drew in Egypt did not stay in Egypt.

If there is "no difference" among men in the matter of guilt, and "no difference" in the way God gives out His saving grace, then there is still a difference between God's saved ones and all others. It is deep and eternal. Light stands apart from darkness, day from night, life from death. In the same way the saved stand apart from all who are unsaved... Christ is the dividing line today between those who are hurrying to eternal doom and those on whom no judgment can ever fall.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Level ground. God had to put a difference because none existed — Israel and Egypt were alike under the death sentence.

- God's line. Only the Lord draws it; claiming to be holier than someone else is the Pharisee's language, not faith's.

- Righteous grace. God's righteousness had to show as clearly in sparing Israel as in striking Egypt.

- The blood. The distinction rested on redemption by blood, not on any moral superiority in Israel.

- Perfect quiet. Where God's word was trusted, judgment passed by without so much as a dog's growl. No later enemy could undo what God had settled.

Exodus 11:8 · Darby

And all these thy bondmen shall come down unto me, and bow down to me, saying, Go out, thou, and all the people that follow thee; and after that I will go out. And he went out from Pharaoh in a glowing anger.

Moses' last words to Pharaoh are not a plea but a prediction. The men who ruled over Israel will bow to Israel's leader and beg the nation to go. Then Moses walks out of the palace burning with anger — and that anger raises the harder question in this verse.

The last time Pharaoh hears God's voice

This message closes a long series of warnings to Pharaoh.

When Pharaoh heard Moses speak the words, beginning with "Thus says the Lord," as recorded in Exodus 11, he was listening to the voice of God for the last time, though he probably did not know it. The preliminary judgments had run their course. The time for talking was over. Decisive action was now to start.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Chapter 10 already ends this meeting, so where does Exodus 11:8 belong?

It must be observed that Exodus 11:8 refers to the same time as Exodus 10:28-29, so that Exodus 11:1 to the middle of Exodus 11:8 took place before Exodus 10:28-29.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

A changed man standing before the king

Nothing is left here of the timid man who once shrank from this errand.

Everything was now prepared. Moses delivers his final message. It was a message full of seriousness and dignity, fitting the majesty of Him whose messenger he was… His mission finished, Moses "went out from Pharaoh in a great anger" (11:8). He was now in full communion with the mind of God, filled as he was with a holy indignation against Pharaoh's sin. (Compare Mark 3:5.) All his timidity has gone. He stands before the king calm and fearless, knowing he carries the authority of the Lord.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Anger that is not sin

The verse ends with Moses in "hot anger." Where does such anger come from?

He delivered this final message with the full weight of God's authority behind it. Then he went out from Pharaoh "in a great anger," or "in a glowing anger." It is no sin to be angry with sin. In Moses there was simply a reflection of what was in the heart of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The test that separates holy anger from temper

Scripture shows Moses angry on other occasions too, and one of them brought punishment on him. So what makes the difference?

Righteous anger never has self in any shape or form for its cause. Moses was angry in Exodus 11:8. But it was over the insults Pharaoh offered to the Lord and His people. That was unlike his anger in Numbers 20, which brought punishment on him. We also find Moses angry in a similar way in Exodus 32:19 and Leviticus 10:16. In Nehemiah 5:6 we find Nehemiah very angry at gross injustice. Others did it, and they did it to others, not to him. So he did "well" to be angry. In Ephesians 4:26 we get the exhortation to "be angry and do not sin"; that is, not to store up anger and malice in our hearts.

Modernised from A. T. SchofieldOriginal wording

Written out as a rule for daily life, it comes to this:

May the Lord help us to ignore personal attacks of any kind and reserve our anger and resentment for attacks on the Person and interests of Christ.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Walking away from Egypt

Moses now looks ahead to the night the firstborn die.

Moses further tells Pharaoh what would happen when the plague of the death of the firstborn took place. All Pharaoh's servants would come to Moses. They would humble themselves and urge him and all Israel to leave the land (v. 8)… Pharaoh was very angry, but Moses "went out from Pharaoh in great anger" (v. 8). This is the occasion Hebrews 11:27 speaks of: "By faith he left Egypt, not being afraid of the anger of the king." Moses had sought the willing cooperation of Egypt. It was now completely refused. He will no longer labour with them, but will give them up to their chosen destruction.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

On the night it happened, the humbling reached the throne itself.

The proud Pharaoh of the exodus stooped to ask the blessing of Moses and Aaron. They represented the people he had kept so long in slavery. He did this when his firstborn lay dead in his house.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Last word. Pharaoh hears God's voice for the last time. After this the talking stops and judgment falls.

- Last fear gone. The timid man is gone. Moses stands before the throne calm and fearless, carrying God's authority.

- Last patience spent. His anger is "glowing anger" — not sin, but a reflection of what was in God's own heart against Pharaoh's sin.

- Last test applied. Righteous anger never has self as its cause; Moses burns over insults to the Lord, not over the king's anger against him.

- Last appeal refused. Egypt's cooperation was sought and refused, so Moses leaves it to the destruction it chose. On the night the firstborn died, even Pharaoh stooped to ask a blessing from Moses and Aaron.

Exodus 11:9 · Darby

And Jehovah had said to Moses, Pharaoh shall not hearken to you; that my wonders may be multiplied in the land of Egypt.

God tells Moses in advance that the king will refuse — and that the refusal itself will serve a purpose. It raises the hardest question in the plague story. If God knew Pharaoh would not listen, why keep sending Moses back? And how can a man's stubbornness serve God's purpose?

God working behind the defiance

The word comes to Moses as steadying news, not as bad news.

Again, in verse 9, the Lord encourages Moses. Behind the defiant stubbornness of Pharaoh, God Himself was working, so that He might multiply His wonders in Egypt.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the blows fell one at a time

If the outcome was certain, the nine earlier plagues can look like wasted time. One writer answers that the delay was not for God's information but for everyone else's.

His ways and judgments are always right. Yet He acts in a way that shows their rightness to His intelligent creation. He knows everything, so He knew that all nine plagues would not subdue the stubborn heart of Pharaoh. But the angelic rulers and powers in heavenly places do not know everything, and neither do men on earth. So God tested Pharaoh and gave room for repentance, as plague followed plague with increasing severity. When the final stroke came, no one could rightly question it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Hardening follows refused testimony

Commentators are careful about the order of events. The hardening is not what starts Pharaoh's unbelief; it is God's response to a man who has already turned down repeated appeals.

Despite the gracious manner in which God had dealt with Pharaoh, giving him repeated chances to agree to what He asked, Pharaoh hardened his heart, showing his deep-seated hatred and hostility to God and His people. Now this proud adversary is to come under the judicial hardening of God… Unbelief never begins as the result of God's judicial hardening. But let there be no doubt that there is such a thing as hardening. Two mistakes here are equally wrong. One says this hardening comes before God gives His first testimony to men. The other denies His righteous, sovereign right to harden a man after that man has refused His testimony.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Another writer traces the same order through the text, giving his own rendering of an earlier verse.

Mercy had been within his reach, but he refused it again and again. Six times over God had solemnly warned him about the folly of resisting Him, in the form of terrible plagues, but each time he hardened his heart (Ex. 7:13 should read, "And Pharaoh's heart was hardened (or strong) so that he did not listen." The Lord did not judicially harden him until chapter 9:12). Then came that terrible word, "For this purpose I have raised you up, to show my power in you."

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

How far the wonders reached

The wonders did not stop at Egypt's border. One writer traces where the news of them landed.

Though God does not choose people for judgment, He does sometimes harden the hearts of wilful rebels. He may even pick up one such man and "raise him up" (Rom. 9:17). That is, He lifts him to a place of great prominence and fame, as with the Pharaoh of the Exodus. He does it to make a warning example of him, and to declare His own power and renown through all the earth. That, too, He does not only for His own name's sake but also for the blessing of men. It was ruin for Pharaoh but it was salvation for Rahab and her household, who had heard of the fame of God's mighty hand.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The messenger who no longer trembles

Moses himself is changed in this final scene. Even his anger now matches God's mind.

He was now in full communion with the mind of God, filled as he was with a holy indignation against Pharaoh's sin. (Compare Mark 3:5.) All his timidity has vanished. He stands before the king calm and fearless, knowing that he carries the authority of the LORD.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The voice heard for the last time

Pharaoh has no idea that this meeting closes the conversation.

In Exodus 11, Pharaoh heard Moses speak the words that begin, "Thus says the LORD." He was listening to the voice of God for the last time, though no doubt he did not know it. The preliminary judgments had run their course. The time for talking was over. Decisive action was now to start.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal. Pharaoh's stubbornness is his own. God gave His testimony first. The hardening came only after Pharaoh had refused that testimony again and again.

- Patience. Nine plagues of rising severity gave room for repentance. When the last blow fell, no one in heaven or on earth could question it.

- Multiplied. Pharaoh meant every refusal as resistance. God used it: each "no" brought one more wonder in the land.

- Declared. The wonders carried God's name far beyond Egypt. It was ruin for Pharaoh. But the report of that mighty hand brought salvation to Rahab and her household.

- Ended. This was the last time Pharaoh heard the voice of God; after the final warning, the time for talking was over.

Exodus 11:10 · Darby

And Moses and Aaron did all these wonders before Pharaoh; but Jehovah made Pharaoh's heart stubborn, and he did not let the children of Israel go out of his land.

Exodus 11:10 closes the account of the first nine plagues. Moses and Aaron have done everything God gave them to do, and the king of Egypt still will not let Israel go. The verse raises the hardest question in the whole account — if the Lord hardened Pharaoh's heart, in what sense was Pharaoh guilty?

A closing line, not a fresh refusal

The verse looks back. It gathers up everything from the first sign to the ninth plague and states the outcome. One commentator notes that this is the last time Scripture says it.

In verse 9 the Lord encourages Moses. Behind Pharaoh's defiant stubbornness, God Himself was working, so that He would multiply His wonders in Egypt. Then verse 10 sums up the results of all the earlier plagues. It tells us that the Lord hardened Pharaoh's heart in determination not to let Israel go. But this is the last time this is said!

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The messengers finished their work

Moses and Aaron "did all these wonders." They left nothing undone and nothing unsaid. And by the end, all of Moses' fear of the king is gone.

So Moses delivers his final message. It is full of solemnity and dignity, suited to the majesty of the One whose messenger he was. When his mission was over, Moses "went out from Pharaoh in great anger." He was now in full communion with the mind of God, filled with holy indignation against Pharaoh's sin. All his timidity has vanished. He stands before the king calm and fearless, knowing that the LORD has clothed him with His own authority.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Where the hardening begins

The order of events in the text settles the difficulty. God's hardening is never the first move; it answers a refusal already made.

The doubt Satan would suggest here is: where was Pharaoh's sin if his heart was hardened like this? Or, how could God righteously destroy someone He had hardened to resist Him? If we look carefully at where these words occur, the difficulty vanishes... Note, then: Scripture does not say this of Pharaoh until after he had rejected the claims of the LORD with scorn. He had said, "Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice and let Israel go? I do not know the LORD, and moreover, I will not let Israel go." He rejected the word of the Lord. He set himself in open opposition to Him and His people. And now God hardens his heart in judgment.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Sovereignty that never cancels responsibility

Many people hear the phrase "vessels of wrath" and conclude that God destines some to be lost. One writer tests that against the word behind "fitted for destruction."

The wicked are not elected to eternal misery — far from it. We find that God endures them — vessels of wrath — with much patience. Their own deeds fit them for destruction, not He. The word katartizo means to correct, repair, mend. In its participial form it means fitted, prepared. The word does not suppose a decree of God, but a work of man.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why nine plagues before the tenth

If God knew Pharaoh would never yield, the long build-up of judgments can look pointless. It was not for God's information but for everyone else's.

His ways and judgments are always right, yet He so acts as to make their rightness clear before His intelligent creation. He knows all things, so He knew that all nine plagues would not subdue the stubborn heart of Pharaoh. But the angelic rulers and powers in heavenly places do not know all things, and neither do men on earth. So He tested Pharaoh and gave room for repentance, as plague followed plague with growing severity. Then no one could rightly question the final stroke when it came.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The warning carried forward

Pharaoh's refusal leaves one thing outstanding: the plague announced at the start of the chapter. That word still searches every reader who keeps putting God off.

Notice the word in Exodus 11 that God whispers, as it were, in the ear of Moses to tell Pharaoh: "Yet one plague more." Mark it, you who do not want a place among the despised followers of Jesus. You have trampled His precious blood underfoot. There remains for you one plague more. And tell me, what will you do when that plague overtakes you? Will you try to escape it? Impossible. Will you try to put it off? Impossible.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal first. Scripture never says God hardened Pharaoh until Pharaoh had rejected His claim outright. The hardening answers the refusal; it does not create it.

- Hardening then. After a settled rejection comes a hardening in judgment — a real act of God, and a righteous one.

- Patience meanwhile. Nine escalating plagues gave room for repentance, so that no creature in heaven or on earth could question the final stroke.

- Guilt still. God endures vessels of wrath with much patience. Their own deeds fit them for destruction, not a decree; God elects no one to ruin.

- One plague more. The verse closes the account of warnings. No one can escape or postpone what waits beyond the last one.