And the sons of Kohath Amram, and Jizhar, and Hebron, and Uzziel. And the years of the life of Kohath were a hundred and thirty-three years.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And the sons of Merari Mahli and Mushi these are the families of Levi according to their generations.
The verse closes Levi's family list with Merari's two sons, Mahli and Mushi. Then it draws a line under the whole record: these are the clans of the Levites. Two questions follow. Why does a family register interrupt the story of Israel's rescue? And why keep the names of this branch?
God has just told Moses he will bring Israel out. The people have refused to listen. At that low point the record turns to family names.
H. Forbes WitherbyJust at this point, when Israel was in despair and Moses was overwhelmed, the record introduces the genealogy of Aaron and Moses. It shows their high dignity as God's servants in the deliverance of Israel. And we see that, though Israel lived in slavery, they lost nothing of their tribal order or of the headship of their princes. Israel was a nation; it was not reduced to a herd of slaves even at the time of its most bitter and hopeless bondage. The genealogy shows a new starting point in the history God gave. Here it begins the story of the era when God fulfils His promise of deliverance.
Merari, Mahli and Mushi were slaves in Egypt. The record names them anyway, household by household.
Arno C. GaebeleinThen comes the record of "the heads of their fathers' houses." He knows them by name. He comes down where the slaves are and calls them by name, and in doing so He identifies Himself with them. And then He knew, as He does now, every groan, every burden, every spot where the whip of the cruel taskmaster had fallen. This is the precious lesson of this register of names. Exodus holds no other genealogy.
Reuben and Simeon get one verse each. Levi's line runs on. Yet Levi's own record was not clean: he joined Simeon in violence.
F. W. GrantLevi is the third son, a number which speaks of resurrection — the power of God shown when on man's side all is gone. His ruin is owned. Levi shows it: he was "joined" to Simeon in that display of cruel anger which Jacob condemns. Yet God's sovereign grace has now taken him up, and he works for His glory. So too, as a picture, this same Levi — "joined" — speaks of Christ as mediator, something only fully reached in resurrection.
The three names in this verse are not happy ones. Their meanings sit oddly beside Levi, and beside the load this branch would carry.
F. W. GrantLast of Levi's three sons we find Merari, "bitter," with his two sons, Mahli, "sick," and Mushi, "yielding." Strangest words of all are these in connection with Levi's sons. These families have charge of the boards of the tabernacle and its bars, its pillars and sockets, and those of the court and the pegs and cords… Merari's work is mainly what we may call church work. And who that has engaged in this has not found the bitterness which Merari's name expresses? A man would be little fitted for ministry who could not feel it.
Later, each branch of Levi received a fixed part of the tent of worship to carry.
Arno C. GaebeleinMerari had charge with his sons of the boards, the sockets, pins and cords. These held the building together… The framework of the tabernacle, with the bars of acacia wood joining the boards, is a picture of the building we read about in Ephesians — "a building fitly framed together," in an older translation — the church. The work of Merari suggests the thought of union.
Named families meant named jobs. Named jobs invite comparison.
George BellEach family had a particular work to do… The family of Merari carried the boards, the bars, the pillars around the court and their sockets, pins and cords. They also set up the tabernacle at each new site… Each had his own work to do. They were not to covet the work of another. The man who carried the tent-pegs was not to envy Kohath's family, who carried the furniture of pure gold. There is a lesson for us here.
- Timing. The family record arrives when Israel is in despair and Moses is overwhelmed. It marks a new start: the era when God keeps His promise of rescue.
- Names. God comes down where the slaves are and calls them by name. Exodus keeps no other genealogy. In naming them, He identifies Himself with them.
- Grace. The record passes over Reuben and Simeon, and owns Levi's ruin. Sovereign grace still takes him up and puts him to work for God's glory.
- Meaning. Merari means "bitter," Mahli "sick," Mushi "yielding." The names match the load this branch would carry, and the bitterness that work brings.
- Purpose. Merari carried the boards, bars, sockets, pins and cords that held the building together — a picture of union. Each family had its own work, and none was to covet another's.
And Amram took Jochebed his aunt as wife; and she bore him Aaron and Moses. And the years of the life of Amram were a hundred and thirty-seven years.
Israel's rescue had stalled, and the people would not listen to Moses. At that moment the record turns to a family tree, and one writer sees the timing as deliberate.
H Forbes WitherbyIsrael was in despair and Moses was overwhelmed. It is just at this point that the record introduces the genealogy of Aaron and Moses, and their high dignity as God's servants in the deliverance of Israel. And we see that Israel was enslaved, yet had lost none of their tribal order and none of the headship of their princes. Israel was a nation; it was not reduced to a herd of slaves even at the time of its most bitter and hopeless bondage.
The list does one plain piece of work.
F. B. HoleThe last verse of the chapter repeats the words of Moses recorded in verse 12. Verses 14-27 give us genealogical details about the sons of Reuben and Simeon, and then more especially the sons of Levi, leading up to Moses and Aaron and their immediate descendants. This establishes who the two chief actors on God's behalf are.
One writer notices how the list narrows, and how the order of the two brothers' names shifts within a few verses.
William KellyThis genealogy starts with Reuben and Simeon and stops at Levi and his sons. It gives prominence to "Aaron and Moses" (20-26) in natural order first, but at the end (v. 27) in spiritual power "Moses and Aaron." Is this man's folly, or God's wisdom and design?
One writer reads the stopping point as pointing past the two men themselves:
Samuel RidoutIt is very significant that the genealogy of the tribes is given only until Moses and Aaron are reached (Ex. 6:26); so Christ is the one object before God, the only Deliverer of His elect.
The verse counts Amram's 137 years, as the chapter counts Levi's and Kohath's. One writer sees more here than record-keeping.
Numerical Bible NotesWith Levi the genealogy expands, and the Spirit of God lingers over it. It records the number of years of Levi himself, of Kohath, and of Amram, and later on of Aaron and Moses at the time of Israel's deliverance. Who can doubt that there is much to be found here besides mere history? What we have seen may at least show that the principles of the covenant hold all through the history. This is one thing the genealogy is designed to bring out.
The same names feed an old question about how long Israel stayed in Egypt.
Morrish Bible DictionaryGenesis 15:13 and Acts 7:6 seem to state the period as four hundred years. A much shorter period is implied in Genesis 15:16, which says of Israel in Egypt that "they shall come back here in the fourth generation." If we turn to Exodus 6:16-20 we find exactly four generations, like this: Jacob's son Levi. Levi's son Kohath. Kohath's son Amram. Amram's son Moses. The mother of Moses, Jochebed, was Levi's daughter (Numbers 26:59), and Amram had married his own aunt (Exodus 6:20). Levi lived only 137 years in all. Suppose he lived in Egypt 88 years. Then Jochebed was born during those years. If Moses was born when she was 47, and Moses was 80 years old at the Exodus, these sums (88 + 47 + 80 = 215 years) show that Israel may have been in Egypt about 215 years. This is the period now generally supposed.
Amram married his father's sister. One writer sets that marriage beside the rules God gave later at Sinai.
C E StuartUntil Israel came to Sinai, we have no hint of any marriage law laid down by God. Before the flood, and certainly in the days of Cain, what the Levitical law ruled as incest was lawful. Men married their sisters. Jochebed was Amram's own aunt, his father's sister. By the law of Leviticus, such unions as Abraham and Sarah, Amram and Jochebed, and Jacob and Rachel were forbidden (Leviticus 18:11-12, 18).
The verse names a household. What happened in that home took courage.
George C WillisAmram and Jochebed were the parents of Moses. What a delightful story theirs is in the second chapter of Exodus. The wife seems to have been the moving spirit here, which is perhaps no surprise, since Jochebed was Amram's aunt (Ex. 6:20). Nothing suggests that Amram was not in his rightful place in that little home in Egypt… Those of us who have lived in a land ruled by a hostile enemy can better appreciate the magnificent courage of this devoted couple. They were not afraid of the king's command. And how God honoured their faith! Each of their three children became one of His own honoured servants.
- Timing — The family tree comes at Israel's lowest point, showing a people still ordered as a nation, not a herd of slaves.
- Identity — Its plain work is to name the two chief actors on God's behalf: this Amram, this Jochebed, these sons.
- Narrowing — The list stops once it reaches Moses and Aaron, and one writer sees Christ there: God's one object, the only Deliverer of His people.
- Counting — The ages of Levi, Kohath and Amram are not filler. They carry the covenant through the history and give four generations from Levi to Moses — about 215 years in Egypt.
- Faith — The marriage Leviticus would later forbid made a home that defied the king's command, and all three children became God's servants.