Exodus 3:1–14

Exodus 3:1 · Darby

And Moses tended the flock of Jethro his father-in-law, the priest of Midian. And he led the flock behind the wilderness, and came to the mountain of God -- to Horeb.

Moses grew up in Egypt's royal court; forty years later he is minding another man's sheep in the desert. Why does God move a gifted man out of sight before He uses him?

From Egypt's Court to the Back of a Mountain

One commentator sets Moses' two worlds side by side.

Here we see an amazing change of circumstances. In Genesis 46:31 we read that "every shepherd is an abomination to the Egyptians." Yet God takes Moses, who had learned all the wisdom of the Egyptians, from the Egyptian court to the back of a mountain, to mind a flock of sheep and to be trained for God's service… To find such a man, with such gifts, called away from such a position to mind sheep at the back of a mountain, is far beyond what human thought or feeling can reach.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Desert as God's School

Those years in Midian were not wasted. They were a training course with two subjects.

Forty is the number of testing. You see it in Israel's forty years in the wilderness, and in the forty days of our blessed Lord's temptation. So this was a time of testing. It tested what Moses was, and it gave him time to prove what God was. We must always learn both before we are fit for service. So God always sends His servants into the wilderness before He uses them… There, alone with Him, we discover how empty our own resources are, and how completely we depend on Him.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Egypt trained Moses well, but something was still missing.

If any educated man in his natural state could expect success in God's service, Moses could have counted on it. He was grown up, he was learned, he was mighty in word and deed. Yet at the back of the desert he had to learn something Egypt's schools could never have taught him. Paul learned more in Arabia than he ever learned at the feet of his teacher Gamaliel. No one can teach like God, and everyone who will learn from Him must be alone with Him.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why Sheep

The job itself was part of the shaping, and it points beyond Moses.

Moses had become a shepherd, the job the Egyptians despised (Gen. 46:34). It was part of God's training, and through it he became "very meek, more than all people who were on the face of the earth" (Num. 12:3). As a shepherd he is a picture of Christ.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Horeb — the Mountain of God

The place matters. God met him at the very spot the story would come back to.

At the end of the 40 years in Midian, Moses had led Jethro's flock close to Horeb. Horeb seems to be the wider name for a group of mountains, and Sinai was its chief peak. God appeared to him at that spot. So he received his commission at the very place where he would bring the people after he led them out of Egypt, and where God would give the law that is for ever linked with his name.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

One commentator notes that the name itself looks ahead.

The scene is at Horeb, called the mountain of God here, a name given ahead of time.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Faithful in Ordinary Work

Moses was doing his ordinary job that day. That routine is where God's call reached him.

In the ordinary run of his work, he leads the flock to the far side of the desert and comes to Horeb, the mountain of God. No doubt he had no idea that his years of exile were about to end… Then something catches Moses' attention. His everyday duties did not stop him recognising the Lord when He showed Himself. They never need to… One of the greatest proofs that a man is subject to God is this: he does his daily work with care and patience, and still keeps his eye ready to watch the ways of God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Sent, Not Self-Appointed

Moses had once tried to act on his own. Here is where his real authority came from.

Horeb is the starting post for everyone God sends out to act for Him… Forty years earlier he had gone to work, but he moved too soon… Here was real authority. There is a huge difference between God sending a man and a man running unsent.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Court — Egypt gave Moses learning and status. None of it could fit him for God's service.

- Desert — Forty years alone tested what Moses was and showed him what God is. Nowhere else do we learn to depend on Him.

- Flock — The Egyptians despised shepherds. That despised work made Moses the meekest of men, and in it he pictures Christ.

- Mountain — God called him at Horeb, and to Horeb he would bring the people he led out.

- Commission — Moses did his daily work with his eye open to God. Then God sent him. Being sent is what separates real service from running unsent.

Exodus 3:2 · Darby

And the Angel of Jehovah appeared to him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a thorn-bush and he looked, and behold, the thorn-bush burned with fire, and the thorn-bush was not being consumed.

Moses turned aside to look at a thorn bush that was burning but would not burn up. The sight raises the question the chapter answers. How can God, who is a consuming fire, come near a people without destroying them?

The Form God Chose

God could have stopped Moses in a hundred ways. He chose this one on purpose.

We are never to suppose that the manner of the revelation of God is an unimportant consideration. He is sovereign, no doubt. But for that very reason His sovereignty is wise. He always shows Himself in the way that best fits the purpose in hand. So it was in no casual way, or merely to catch attention by wonders, that Jehovah here appears in the burning bush. The bush is weak and ready to vanish away, yet it remains. Where God reveals Himself in pity as well as in power, He sustains the one He is dealing with. Whatever the siftings and judgments, whatever the trials, He uses them for nothing but good. It is for His own glory, and so for the very best interests of those who are His.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Three Parts of the Vision

One writer takes the scene apart piece by piece.

There are three parts to the vision granted here — the Lord, the flame of fire, and the bush. Notice first that it says the angel of the Lord appeared to Moses (v. 2). Then the Lord saw that he turned aside, and God called to him from inside the bush... So the angel of the Lord is identified with Jehovah, yes, with God Himself. In all these appearances of the angel of the Lord in the Old Testament, we see, pictured in advance, the coming of the Son of God in human flesh. In each case it is God the Son... The flame of fire is a symbol of the holiness of God... The bush was meant to be a figure of Israel. Nothing is more easily consumed by fire than a bush, and it was chosen for this very reason to represent the nation.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A Bush of Thorns

The word used is not for a fine tree.

In both the Old and New Testaments, the word used means a bush of thorns, or bramble bush. It is a bush of little worth, and fire would soon burn it up. But God was in the bush, and therefore it was not consumed.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Thorns are not a neutral detail. They trace back to the first pages of the Bible, where the ground was cursed after man's sin.

You remember that thorns were the sign of the curse at the beginning. Botanists tell us that thorns (at least the kind we are dealing with here) are really stunted leaves. They are parts of a plant that cannot do what they were first meant to do. Sinners are in this symbol naturally connected with the curse upon sin. And we can view the thorn-bush itself, without forcing the picture, as the type of sinful flesh. This is what the people are, and so the fire comes. But the bush is not consumed, because the Angel of Jehovah, their covenant God, is in that fire.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The Fire and the Furnace

The fire means more than holiness. Israel was already in a furnace.

The fire is the symbol of their suffering and tribulation... Later God called Egypt the "iron furnace" (Deut. 4:20). The thornbush, however, is not consumed. All the fires of persecution and tribulation could not consume Israel.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Who was in the bush? One writer answers, and points to a later furnace.

But the Son of God was in the bush. That was the secret. He was with Israel in Egypt, just as He was later in the furnace with Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego. The bush burned, and the furnace was heated seven times hotter than usual. Yet the smell of fire did not settle on them.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

God Living Among His People

The wonder is not that fire burns, but that this bush lived. Another writer sees in it God living among a redeemed people.

What a fitting, solemn, and beautiful picture of Jehovah living among His chosen and redeemed people! "Our God is a consuming fire" — not to consume us, but to consume everything in us and around us that is against His holiness. Such things destroy our true and lasting happiness.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

From the Bush to Bethlehem

The bush points forward. One writer sees its full answer in a manger, quoting an older translation of 1 Timothy 3:16.

The Baby in Bethlehem's manger was the great fulfilment of the burning bush. "God was manifest in the flesh and seen of angels." God was in the midst of men and they were not consumed.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Bush. A worthless bramble, thorny from the curse on sin. It pictures a people that fire could burn up in a moment.

- Fire. Two things at once: Israel's affliction in Egypt, and the holiness of a God who is a consuming fire.

- Angel. The one in the flame is identified with Jehovah Himself; the bush survived only because God was inside it.

- Purpose. He consumes what is contrary to His holiness, not the people He has redeemed for Himself.

- Fulfilment. The unburnt bush finds its answer at Bethlehem — God in the midst of men, and men not consumed.

Exodus 3:3 · Darby

And Moses said, Let me now turn aside and see this great sight, why the thorn-bush is not burnt.

Moses is far from Egypt, keeping another man's sheep, when a bush on fire refuses to burn up. He steps off his path to ask why. That turn makes an ordinary day the moment God speaks his name.

A sight that broke the rules of nature

Fire consumes what it touches. Moses watched that law fail in front of him. The lesson went far beyond one bush.

Here was a sight that directly contradicted everything natural, and Moses was drawn to it. He had to learn that although "our God is a consuming fire" (Heb. 12:29), He could live among a people who in themselves were thorny and fit fuel for the flames, and yet not consume them. It was indeed a "great sight." For forty years in the wilderness the LORD dwelt as a pillar of fire among rebellious Israel. In those years Moses must have thought back on the way God had revealed Himself to him at the start, in His great kindness.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the bush and the fire stood for

The bush is a thorn bush; some translations read "thorn-bush" here. Each part of the picture means something, and the reason the bush survives is not in the bush.

The burning bush is a picture of the suffering people, the wretched slaves in Egypt. It was a thornbush. Thorns are the result of sin, so the bush pictures the sinfulness and worthlessness of the people. The fire is the symbol of their suffering and tribulation… The thornbush, however, is not consumed. All the fires of persecution and tribulation could not consume Israel. In the flame of the fire in the midst of the burning bush the angel of the LORD appeared. This was the secret of the bush's preservation; God was there and kept them.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The question Moses asked, restated

Moses wanted to know why the bush was not burnt. Turn that into a question about God and man, and it becomes the largest question there is.

Let us repeat this expression of wonder — "Why is the bush not burned!" Put it another way. God is a "consuming fire," burning up all that is contrary to His Holy Being. How then can He reveal Himself without consuming? Here was the great question. Can He "who is of purer eyes than to behold iniquity" deal with man in any way except by judgment in righteousness? Yes; most surely He can, and He has done so. He has revealed Himself in Christ! And grace now reigns, through righteousness, to eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord! That is the gospel.

Modernised from F. G. PattersonOriginal wording

The turn that came before the call

Note the order: Moses turns, then God calls. His stopping was not a delay before the real event. It marked him out.

Moses turns aside to see why the bush is not consumed. "And when the LORD saw that he turned aside," God called him, to reveal Himself as the God of holiness, who was like a consuming fire. Yet in grace He could take up such a people as Israel — a frail, useless bush of the desert. He would not destroy them, but purify them and glorify them with His own presence. This is the whole central plan and idea of redemption. What shows Moses to be a seer is that he turns aside to study it, instead of passing by in indifference. "When the LORD saw that," He called him to the prophetic office.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What Moses would have missed

Walking on would have cost Moses the blessing. He stayed and listened, and found out who was in the bush.

It was a great and mysterious sight that Moses turned aside to look at; yet barefoot he could still look and listen. Had he not done so, he would have gone away unblessed. But he listened, until he discovered that the "I AM" was in the bush; and further, that "the God of Abraham" was there too. A strange place for such glory to house itself! But so it was. In a burning bramble bush, the Lord God Almighty was found.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Why God spoke from a bush

God was about to send Moses out on a commission. The place He chose to speak from was itself part of the message.

He was about to give Moses his commission to lead His people out of Egypt. They were to be His assembly — His dwelling-place, in the wilderness and in the land of Canaan. And the place from which He speaks is a burning bush. What a fitting, solemn and beautiful symbol of the LORD dwelling among His chosen and redeemed people! "Our God is a consuming fire," not to consume us, but to consume everything in us and around us that is contrary to His holiness.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Great — fire that burns and does not destroy. The sight broke the rule of nature, and Moses stopped.

- Thorny — the bush was a worthless desert bramble. It pictured slaves in Egypt with nothing in themselves to survive the fire.

- Why — Moses' question is the gospel question: how can a holy God come near to man and not consume him? The answer is Christ.

- Turning — God called only after He saw Moses turn aside. Stopping to look at God is what fits a person for His service.

- Dwelling — the God who spared the bush lives among His people. He consumes not them, but what is contrary to His holiness.

Exodus 3:4 · Darby

And Jehovah saw that he turned aside to see, and God called to him out of the midst of the thorn-bush and said, Moses, Moses! And he said, Here am I.

For forty years Moses kept sheep in the desert. Then a bush burned without burning up, he stepped aside to look, and God spoke his name out of the flame.

The turn that God was watching for

God's call comes the moment Moses stops to look. One writer sees a pattern in that:

Then one ordinary day the extraordinary thing happens, and he turns aside to see the "common bush aflame with God." "When the LORD saw that he turned aside to see, God called to him." To a definite call and commission He adds the gracious confirmation, "Certainly I will be with you." But first He had to gain his attention. How often this same pattern has repeated. God waits to use and bless us, as soon as He can gain our interest in what He is doing, is about to do, or is willing to do through us.

Modernised from W G TurnerOriginal wording

The waiting had a purpose. Egypt taught him, and the desert had to unteach him.

The moment Moses had so long desired came. His long training in the wisdom of the Egyptians did not bring it. An equal stretch in the desert, spent unlearning, had to run out first. Only then did God give him the effective call.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who is speaking from the bush

Verse 2 says the angel of the LORD appeared; verse 4 says God called. That difference matters.

Notice first that the angel of the Lord appeared to Moses (v. 2). Then the Lord saw that he turned aside, and God called to him out of the bush. So the angel of the Lord is identified with Jehovah — yes, with God Himself. There is no doubt that in all these Old Testament appearances of the angel of the Lord we see the coming incarnation of the Son of God foreshadowed.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The name said twice

God calls the name, and says it twice. That doubling runs right through Scripture:

God's greatness and majesty produced a striking response when He spoke in grace to saints of old. When He called, "Abraham, Abraham," at once the answer came, "Here I am." When He said, "Jacob, Jacob," the reply came at once: "Here I am." To Moses He spoke, "Moses, Moses!" and Moses answered at once: "Here I am." … The same One speaks as before, in the same way, but now come down in lowly grace: "Martha, Martha!" and "Simon, Simon!" Once again, after His ascension, "Saul, Saul!"

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Why the voice came from inside the flame

The place God chose to speak from carries the message.

The Lord was about to give Moses his commission to lead His people out of Egypt. They were to be His assembly — His dwelling place, in the wilderness and in the land of Canaan. And the place from which He speaks is a burning bush. What a fitting, solemn, and beautiful picture of the Lord living among His chosen and redeemed people! "Our God is a consuming fire." He does not consume us. He consumes everything in us and about us that is contrary to His holiness.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The voice answered the question the sight had raised.

Moses could now know why the bush was not consumed: God was in the midst of the flame. God was in and with Israel in their furnace of affliction; He was in their midst sustaining and keeping them.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Called, then told to stop

The first words after the name are not the commission but a warning about the ground. Being called near is not the same as being casual.

His presence is the true power of sanctification. Forms He could and did use under the law, in tabernacle and temple. But He Himself is more than any or all of them. What a support this was for Moses! He had to go in to Pharaoh, lead His people out, and bear with their waywardness in the wilderness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One call, heard again and again

This is not an isolated episode but part of a series of divine calls running through Scripture:

In the garden, out of heaven, and for a third time out of the bush, God's call is heard. This time He calls not as the truth that exposes sin, nor as the love that provides a substitute, but as the Holy One who redeems His people. He takes His place among them without lessening His glory, and He makes them able to bear it. The call implies that man had wandered from God, as Adam had. It comes from the heart of God, and it invites us into His own heavenly presence, as it did Abraham.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Attention. God waited until Moses turned aside; the call came the moment He had the man's interest.

- Voice. The One who called is the angel of the LORD, identified with God Himself. Writers see the coming incarnation of the Son foreshadowed here.

- Name. He calls "Moses, Moses" — as He did with Abraham, Jacob, Martha, Simon and Saul. The doubled name draws out the reply, "Here I am."

- Fire. God speaks from inside the flame, and that is why the bush survives. A consuming fire dwells among His people without destroying them.

- Presence. His presence itself, not any form or ritual, is what sanctifies. That presence is what sustained Moses before Pharaoh.

Exodus 3:5 · Darby

And he said, Draw not nigh hither loose thy sandals from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground.

Moses turns aside to look at a bush that burns without burning up. God's first words to him are not about Egypt or Israel. They are about the ground under his feet. Before the commission comes the check: the man God is about to send must first learn what God is.

The First Lesson Before Any Service

God calls Moses by name, then stops him. One writer reads this halt as the first lesson of every relationship with God, and the condition for hearing anything from Him.

God must remind him of the holiness of the divine presence. "Do not come near; take your sandals off your feet, for the place on which you are standing is holy ground." This is the first lesson that all who approach God must learn: to recognize His holiness. True, He is a God of grace and mercy, and He is love; but He is all these because He is a holy God... But we must take our shoes off, remembering the holiness of the God we deal with. Otherwise we can never receive the gracious communications of His mind and will.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why the Ground Is Holy

Nothing about that patch of desert made it different from the sand around it. The holiness came from who was there. The same holds for any place God chooses to dwell.

The place of God's presence is holy, and can only be trodden with unshod feet. God dwells among His people. That gives their assembly a character of holiness, and it is the basis of every holy affection and every holy activity. The character of the dwelling place takes its stamp from the character of the Occupant.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The presence that demands holiness also supplies it.

His presence is the true power of sanctification. Forms He could and did use under the law, in tabernacle and temple. But He Himself is more than any or all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the Sandals

The command targets the feet, and sandals had a job to do.

Shoes are to protect the feet from injury and defilement. The feet are our point of contact with the earth. How important that shoes guard them from its thorns and its soil! In the presence of God the shoes came off, for the ground was holy. Earth must not defile in that holy Presence.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Bare feet also said something about the man himself. One writer reads the removal as an admission:

Moses' shoes must be removed as a confession of his own dependent weakness before God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

"Do Not Come Near" — and What Changed Later

The order to stop marks a boundary. One writer sets it beside a later scene, where a father puts shoes on the feet of the son who comes home.

It showed that as yet there was no welcome for man into the presence of God. God had not yet made a standing for him, however much goodness and kindness He might show him. Under grace a standing is found. The son who came home received shoes; he was welcome and at home.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The two commands are not in conflict; they belong to two different footings before God.

"Put shoes on his feet," too. The law said, "Take off the sandal." Grace says, "Put shoes on" — that is, "I will provide him with fitness to tread those courts above." The law says, "Take your shoes off, you are not fit." Grace says, "I will make you fit."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Yet the boundary did not send Moses away.

Long ago, anyone entering that presence had to take the shoes off his feet, to express the sense of holiness that suited it. But that was all. God did not require Moses or Joshua to withdraw; only to tread softly. They were welcomed and encouraged, while being taught the holiness of such closeness.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Fire That Does Not Consume

The holiness of the spot is tied to the sight in front of Moses. Commentators read the bush as Israel under Egypt's fire, and then look further:

But the fact of this being holy ground points to a much deeper lesson than this, for it is a reminder of the cross of Christ, where all the awesome fire of God's judgment fell upon the Lord Jesus because of our sins. But that fire did not consume Him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Holiness first. God tells Moses where he stands before He says a word about Egypt. Holiness is the first lesson.

- The Occupant, not the location. Desert sand becomes holy ground because God is there. A dwelling takes its character from the One who fills it.

- Bare feet. Shoes carry the soil of the road. Taking them off confesses the earth's defilement and the servant's own weakness.

- Stopped but not sent away. "Do not come near" set a limit, but God did not send Moses away. He told him to tread softly.

- Shoes given back. What law removed, grace supplies. The fire of judgment fell on Christ and did not consume Him, so the son comes home and receives shoes.

Exodus 3:6 · Darby

And he said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. And Moses hid his face; for he was afraid to look at God.

At the burning bush God names Himself to Moses by three men long dead. Moses covers his face. Why that name, at that moment? And why did the sight of God frighten him?

The Name of the Fathers, Not of Sinai

God did not name Himself from Sinai and the law. He named Himself from the promises made to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. That choice shaped how near Moses could come.

Moses had to keep at a distance and remove his shoes, as a sign that the place was holy, and he was only a servant. There had to be distance. But it was far less marked than later, when God gave the law. This was doubtless because at the outset the Lord revealed Himself to him as "the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob." The God who set up the covenant of promise was not so awesome as when He gave the law from Sinai.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The name itself was old. What was new was that God was now about to act on it.

The name He gave Himself was not new — people had heard it before. But now He was about to act on its reality and present value. There was to be accomplishment up to a certain and evident point, and not promise only. So the stress falls on "the God of your fathers," explained as "the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Personal Link

Before the three great names comes a smaller one: "the God of your father." That phrase reached Moses himself.

The words that Moses heard out of the middle of the fire in the bush must have awakened in his heart the memory of God's goodness towards the fathers. But they must also have shown him that he had a personal link with the God of Abraham. For God had said to him, "I am the God of your father."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Why Moses Hid His Face

The same meeting shows two things at once: grace and holiness.

If God's holiness is infinite, His grace is infinite also. The way He revealed Himself to Moses declared His holiness. The very fact that He revealed Himself at all showed His grace. He came down because He was gracious. But having come down, He would reveal Himself as holy… God's presence must always make nature hide itself. When we stand before God with bare feet and covered head — the attitude of soul which those acts so aptly and beautifully express — we are ready to listen to the sweet words of grace. When man takes his proper place, God can speak in the language of unmixed mercy.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Moses' fear marks where he stood — before the exodus, before God had redeemed His people.

Before redemption, even a saint trembled when brought into God's presence. His voice does declare Him the God of promise, the God of the fathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Even so, "Moses trembled, and did not dare to look." Until redemption, peace is impossible.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Verse Jesus Used to Prove Resurrection

Jesus used this sentence to prove that the dead live. His argument turns on what it would mean for God to name Himself after men who no longer exist.

If Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob had ceased to exist, could God still have taken their names, the names of nothing, to describe Himself to Israel? … God describes Himself by them. He is not ashamed to be called their God… He is not the God of the dead, but of the living. But this truth went further. Abraham was dead, his soul separated from his body. He was living for God, yet he was not what God meant him to be as his God… He was to be complete, and so raised from the dead.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Everything turns on one small word — the tense of the verb.

Our Lord stresses His point in that God said, "I AM." The strength of His argument lies in the present tense of the verb "to be." So exact is verbal inspiration.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

The Same Sight, A Different Response

Moses could not look. Believers now can. The difference is how God has since made Himself known.

This is a great sight for us to turn aside and see. It is greater than what Moses saw, as the substance is greater than the shadow. In Jesus, God is made known to us and brought near. In His presence our souls can stay without a fear, unlike Moses, who "hid his face, for he was afraid to look at God" — for "GOD IS LOVE."

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Name — God names Himself by the fathers and the covenant of promise, not by the law. The distance is real, but gentler than Sinai's.

- Personal — "the God of your father" gave Moses his own link to that promise, not just an inherited story.

- Holy — He came down because He is gracious. Having come down, He shows Himself holy, and human nature hides.

- Living — God still names Himself their God. "I AM" is present tense, so Abraham, Isaac and Jacob live to Him and must rise.

- Near — The bush was the shadow. The substance is God made known in Jesus. There the soul that once hid its face can stay without fear.

Exodus 3:7 · Darby

And Jehovah said, I have seen assuredly the affliction of my people who are in Egypt, and their cry have I heard on account of their taskmasters; for I know their sorrows.

God speaks to Moses from the burning bush and tells him what He has noticed: a nation of slaves, their cry, and their pain. Two questions grow out of this one sentence: why did God wait so long, and what finally moved Him to act?

(The ESV reads "I know their sufferings." The quotes below use an older translation: "I know their sorrows.")

"My people"

The decisive word in the verse is the small one: God calls these slaves His own. That claim, not their condition, decides the outcome.

These words reveal a great basic principle in the ways of God. It is on the ground of what He is that He always acts. "I AM" secures everything for "MY PEOPLE." He was never going to leave His people among the brick kilns of Egypt, under the whip of Pharaoh's taskmasters. They were His people, and He would act toward them in a way worthy of Himself. To be His people settled everything. They were the favoured objects of Jehovah's electing love, the subjects of His unconditional promise. He had come down to deliver them. The combined power of earth and hell could not hold them captive one hour beyond His appointed time.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

That title starts here, and it becomes the demand God makes of Pharaoh.

The first time we read of God calling Israel "My people" was when He spoke to Moses from the burning bush (Exodus 3:7). Following this, the first demand to Pharaoh (Exodus 5:1) was "Let My people go."

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Seen, heard, known

The verse stacks three statements together. They answer years that looked like silence.

He declared three things. First, His attention to the cry of His people and His sympathetic concern for their sorrows. For a century or two it must have seemed as though He was indifferent. But it was not so. God is never in a hurry and He intervenes in His own time, which is the right time. The three statements in verse 7 are very touching: He had seen; He had heard; He knew their sorrows. So it always is with all His people, with us among the rest.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The cry He heard

God says He heard their cry — but not that they cried to Him. Several writers press this distinction.

But He does not add that the cry was to Him. We may say then, as a prophet did later, that they groaned; but they did not groan to God. It was only a selfish sense of suffering. They groaned only because of their wretchedness; but there was no looking out to God — no counting on His mercy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

If the cry was not aimed at God, then the reason God moved has to lie somewhere else.

This lesson gives the soul great strength: God always finds His motive within Himself. It is on the ground of what He is, and not on the ground of what we are… There is not a word to show that the children of Israel had cried to the Lord. But their misery had touched His heart. He "knew their sorrows, and had come down to deliver them." So "God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us." (Romans 5:8)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

"I know their sufferings"

Knowing here is not distant information. It is love that goes into detail.

He began to show more than His grace in giving His promises to the seed, which faith could lay hold of. He showed His own considerate love in caring for the need and sorrows of His people… He took notice of every circumstance of their trouble and sorrow.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Coming down

Darby reads the "I" of these words as God stepping out of His own glory into a place strange to Him.

Is not this "I" the Lord placing Himself as coming down into Egypt? He came out of all that was natural to Himself and His glory. He placed Himself in the middle of what was strange to Him, to deliver them. "I have seen, I have seen the affliction of my people, and I have come down to deliver them." He speaks as identifying Himself with His people.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Egypt and us

Writers read Israel's slavery as a picture of a condition shared by everyone, and their rescue as a picture of salvation.

Read Exodus 2:23 and 3:1-10. There we see the condition of the people in cruel bondage and slavery. It is an exact picture of our condition under the cruel bondage of sin and Satan. Their cries and groans came up to God… Such is the condition by nature of every man, whether he knows it or not. And note, the source of their deliverance was not in themselves. The source of our salvation is the love of God. God is love. He came down to deliver.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Seen — God watched the affliction through long years that looked like indifference. He acts in His own time, and that is the right time.

- Heard — the cry reached Him, though it was not addressed to Him. Their misery alone moved Him, not their merit.

- Known — He noticed every circumstance of their trouble, not the general fact of it.

- Owned — "My people" is the word that settles the outcome; God acts on the ground of what He is, not what they are.

- Come down — He identifies Himself with them and steps into Egypt to deliver. The same love later sent Christ for sinners.

Exodus 3:8 · Darby

And I am come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up out of that land unto a good and spacious land, unto a land flowing with milk and honey, unto the place of the Canaanites, and the Hittites, and the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites.

God speaks to Moses from the burning bush. He tells him what He has already decided to do: come down, rescue a nation of slaves, and settle them in a land where six other peoples live. The verse is short. Yet commentators find in it the whole shape of redemption — where God starts, why He acts, and where He means to finish.

Love That Moves First

Nothing in the verse suggests Israel asked for this. One writer asks where God's motive comes from, and shows how little the people contributed:

God always finds His motive within Himself. He acts on the ground of what He is, not on the ground of what we are. The occasion of His action was the condition of His people. "The LORD said, 'I have surely seen the affliction of my people who are in Egypt and have heard their cry because of their taskmasters; I know their sufferings'" (v. 7). What infinite tenderness! There is not a word to show that the children of Israel had cried to the Lord. They had sighed and cried because of their bondage, but it does not appear that their hearts had turned to the Lord. But their misery had touched His heart. He "knew their sorrows, and had come down to deliver them." So "God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us" (Rom. 5:8).

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Delivered For Himself

God does not rescue Israel and then leave them to themselves. One writer notices that God calls these slaves His own before He does anything to improve them:

Who but God would have spoken so openly of a poor set of slaves as "My people"? Others would have delivered and dressed them up first. It is the same God who, as a father, falls on the neck of the returning prodigal son in his rags and kisses him. That comes before the honours poured on him later. But whether we look at the picture or at the reality behind it, one thing is vital to grasp. Redemption is the work of God, present in some sense, and delivering — not only from the enemy, but for Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Brought Out And Brought In

The verse contains two promises, not one, and they organise everything that follows:

The eighth verse points out the two parts of Exodus. The Lord announced two things He would do for His people. 1. I have come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians. 2. And to bring them up out of that land to a good land flowing with milk and honey. Exodus has two great parts which match these two statements.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

God gave Moses both halves of that errand, and he managed only the first. Another writer sees the verse pointing past Moses to Christ:

God sent Moses to lead them out, and to bring them in (Exodus 3:8, 10, 12). He failed, but Christ does both. Meanwhile, as High Priest, Christ has gone in to keep us now joined to our true place of blessing, and in all the value of the blood, as God values it, until He puts us into actual possession at His coming again.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

No Desert In The Plan

Between Egypt and Canaan lie forty years — and they are not mentioned here. Several writers make much of that silence:

If you look at Exodus 3, you will see that the wilderness formed no part of God's purpose... In Exodus 6 you find the same, and in Exodus 15, where faith celebrates redemption, you have the same thing. "You have guided them by your strength to your holy abode." This leaps right over the wilderness. He did bring them through the wilderness, but it was no part of His purpose for them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Good Land And A Large

The destination is described by what it produces without being forced. That contrast with Egypt is the point:

Not a word is said of the wilderness, and its forty years of endurance and toil. His plan was to test them there, which He did. But His purpose was to bring them to the place where He could dwell, to a land that "drinks water by the rain from heaven, a land that the LORD your God cares for" (Deut. 11).

after_note: DELETE He would bring us into a place where His own heart can be satisfied, and where He may dwell with and enjoy His people. How different from the land of slavery where nothing is to be had for nothing, where no man gives!

F. G. Patterson

The Six Peoples In The Way

The promised land already has occupants, and God names them. One writer reads the names as a picture of what stands between a believer and enjoying what God has given:

The names here, as everywhere, are certainly significant. They stand for the powers of evil that hold the ground and would keep us from enjoying the inheritance God has given us in Christ. The Hittite, "child of terror" — how spiritual dread makes cowards of us all! The Amorite, "the talker," rather than the doer of the Word. The Canaanite, "the trafficker," companion to the talker, who turns the very truth of God into merchandise... while the Jebusite, "the treader down," never rests until it treads every divine thing underfoot. All these must be cast out.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Down — God moves first; the people's misery, not their prayers, is what draws Him down.

- For Himself — He comes not only to break Egypt's grip but to take a people as His own, in their rags.

- Out — the first promise is rescue from Egypt, and it fills the first half of the book.

- In — the second promise is a land, and it is the goal; the desert was where He tested them, never His purpose for them.

- Kept — God sent Moses to bring them out and bring them in; he failed at the second, but Christ does both.

Exodus 3:9 · Darby

And now behold, the cry of the children of Israel is come unto me; and I have also seen the oppression with which the Egyptians oppress them.

God speaks to Moses from the burning bush and tells him what He has seen and heard in Egypt. Two things move Him: a cry that has come to Him, and an oppression He has watched. So why does He act now?

The cry that reached Him

The verse says the cry came to God. It does not say the people sent it to Him. One writer notices what is missing:

The Lord then brings His care before Moses, saying, "I have surely seen the affliction of My people who are in Egypt, and have heard their cry because of their taskmasters. I know their sufferings." But He does not add that their cry was to Him. We may say, as a prophet did later, that they groaned. But they did not groan to God. It was only a selfish sense of suffering. They groaned because of their misery. There was no looking out to God — no counting on His mercy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"I have also seen"

The verse adds sight to hearing. God has watched the taskmasters at work, and He notices the details:

He began to show more than His grace in giving the promises to the seed, which faith could lay hold of. He also showed His own thoughtful love in caring for the need and sorrows of His people... He took notice of every circumstance of their trouble and sorrow.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Their need, not their worth

The verse says nothing about repentance or reform in Israel. Their condition alone moves God to act:

Here the absolute, free, unconditional grace of the God of Abraham, and of Abraham's seed, shines out in all its own brightness. Nothing holds it back — not the "ifs" and "buts," and not the vows, resolutions, and conditions of man's legal spirit... He had not come down to check whether the people His promise covered deserved His salvation. It was enough for Him that they needed it. Their oppressed state, their sorrows, their tears, their sighs, their heavy bondage had all passed in review before Him. For, blessed be His name, He counts His people's sighs and puts their tears into His bottle.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer carries the same point into the New Testament. God loved people who were not looking for Him:

There is not a word to show that the children of Israel had cried to the Lord. They had sighed and cried because of their bondage, but it does not appear that their hearts had turned to the Lord. But their misery had touched His heart. He "knew their sorrows, and had come down to deliver them." So "God shows His love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us." (Rom. 5:8.)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Slaves called "My people"

The verse calls them the people of Israel — slaves making bricks for a foreign king. God owns them before He rescues them:

Who but God would have spoken so openly of a poor set of slaves as "My people"? Others would have delivered and dressed them up first. It is the same God who, as a father, falls on the neck of the returning prodigal son in his rags and kisses him. That comes before all the honours given to him later... redemption is the work of God, present in some form and delivering — not only from the enemy, but for Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Once God calls them His own, both the outcome and its timing are settled:

"I AM" secures everything for "MY PEOPLE." He was never going to leave His people among the brick-kilns of Egypt, under the lash of Pharaoh's taskmasters... He had come down to deliver them. The combined power of earth and hell could not keep them captive one hour beyond His appointed time.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

From the cry to the commission

God hears the cry, and then He sends a man. He comes down Himself, yet works through someone unfit for the job:

In verse 8 God says, "I have come down to deliver them…" Then in Exodus 3:10 He says, "Come, I will send you to Pharaoh that you may bring My people… out of Egypt." God in His sovereign wisdom had chosen a man whose later actions showed him to be weak and unfit. Yet God would be with His servant. He would give him such power and authority that everyone would see the excellence of the power belonged to God, and not to the instrument He had chosen.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Cry — The groan was one of misery, not of faith; God heard a cry that was never sent to Him.

- Seen — He had watched every circumstance of the trouble, so nothing about their sorrow was news to Him.

- Grace — He did not come down to check their merit. Their need was enough, and He kept count of their tears.

- Owned — He calls slaves in rags "My people," and delivers them not only from the enemy but for Himself.

- Sent — The cry becomes a commission. God sends a weak man, so the power on show is His own.

Exodus 3:10 · Darby

And now come, and I will send thee unto Pharaoh, that thou mayest bring forth my people the children of Israel out of Egypt.

God has just said that He Himself has come down to rescue Israel from Egypt. Then He sends a man to do it — one who had already tried to help his people, failed, and fled.

God's rescue, God's messenger

Verse 8 and verse 10 say two different things. God will deliver Israel — and Moses will bring them out.

Let us put these statements together. Combined like this, they give us a thought of enormous weight. In verse 8 God says, "I have come down to deliver them …" Then in Exodus 3:10 He says, "Come, I will send you to Pharaoh that you may bring my people …" In sovereign wisdom God had chosen one whose later actions marked him as weak and incompetent, yet God would be with His servant. He would give him power and authority in such a way, and in such measure, that everyone would see the greatness of the power belonged to God, not to the instrument He had chosen to deliver His people.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

"Come," not "Go"

Moses had once rushed ahead of God's time. Now the time has come, and notice which word God uses.

"Come, I will send you" (Ex. 3:10). God's moment has arrived. Formerly Moses wanted to go without waiting for God's time, but now he is about to hesitate. God does not say "Go" but "Come." God sends him in His own company and fellowship. Even so, Moses is not willing to answer. He brings God four objections, one after another.

Modernised from VariousOriginal wording

Sent, not self-appointed

Forty years earlier Moses had acted on his own. What changed was not his desire but his commission.

Horeb is really the starting post for all whom God sends forth to act for Him. It was at Horeb that Moses learnt to take off his shoes and hide his face. Forty years before he had gone to work, but his movement was premature… Here was real authority. There is a vast difference between God sending a man, and a man running unsent… God had to teach him, and God had to commission him. Everyone who goes out to serve Christ and speak for Him needs the same teaching and the same commission from God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Zeal and ability were never Moses' problem. The right to act was.

Authority means having the right or title to act, and not only the ability to do it; ability is what the word often translated "power" expresses. You could say Moses had zeal and ability when he first set out to right his people's wrongs in Egypt. But someone challenged his authority — "Who made you a prince and a judge over us?" — and he fled in disgrace. Later the LORD said to him, "Come, I will send you to Pharaoh that you may bring my people, the children of Israel, out of Egypt." This time he went as a messenger with God's own credentials.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Eighty years old, and ready

The years of waiting were not wasted. God's timing had a reason.

God had used various circumstances to prepare Moses for this time when He tells him He is sending him to Egypt to deliver Israel from their bondage (v. 10). Perhaps by now he thought he was past the age of being usable by God at all, for he was 80 years old (Acts 7:30). But God knew that at 40 he was not ready, and 80 is just the right time, for God does not use one because of his strength, but more likely because of his weakness.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The rejected man, now the deliverer

The man now sent to Pharaoh is the same man Israel had once pushed away.

Israel had rejected this Moses forty years before. Now they accepted him as their God-appointed leader. God sent him as "both ruler and redeemer by the hand of the angel who appeared to him in the bush" (Acts 7:35).

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The pattern of a greater rescue

Israel's slavery is a picture of a deeper bondage, and God's rescue shows the pattern of ours.

Read Exodus 2:23 and 3:1-10, and you see the people in cruel bondage and slavery. It is an exact picture of our own condition under the cruel bondage of sin and Satan. Their cries and groans came up to God… And note, the source of their deliverance was not in themselves. The source of our salvation is the love of God. God is love. He came down to deliver. He sent Moses to deliver. "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life."

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent by God. God comes down to deliver, and He sends a man to do it. One work, seen from both sides.

- Sent with God. God says "Come," not "Go." Moses goes in God's company, not just on God's errand.

- Sent, not running. Zeal without a commission collapsed forty years earlier; authority is what Horeb added.

- Sent in weakness. At forty Moses was not ready; at eighty he was, because God uses weakness rather than strength.

- Sent as a picture. The rejected man became the deliverer — a picture of a greater rescue that begins in the love of God.

Exodus 3:11 · Darby

And Moses said to God, Who am I, that I should go unto Pharaoh, and that I should bring forth the children of Israel out of Egypt?

Forty years earlier Moses struck down an Egyptian, sure his people would see him as their rescuer. Now God sends him, and the man who once ran without a call draws back — humility, unbelief, or both?

The Two Failures of One Man

The same person can fail in opposite directions at different stages of life. Moses' hesitation is the mirror image of his earlier haste.

Here we see the man who was truly to be the instrument of Israel's deliverance. Until now he had run ahead of his time. He draws back at the moment he receives the call he needed. The man who showed the forwardness of nature now shows the backwardness of nature. The voice of God is now urging him forward with authority, and even that is not enough for him.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The timing is striking. Courage came before God spoke. The obstacles appeared the moment He did.

Is this the man once so ready to strike Egypt and deliver Israel? The very same. Full of courage when God's time had not come, he feels the obstacles when it has. It is often so!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Midian Taught Him

The years in Midian were not wasted. They stripped Moses of confidence in himself. That was a gain, but only half the lesson.

During his many years in Midian he had given up all thoughts of his own greatness. That was good. But now he had gone to the other extreme... For the moment Moses had his eye on himself and not on God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

One writer says this shrinking always marks the person God sends.

When a believer feels that God has sent him on a mission, there is always the deepest bowing down of spirit. This may come about through painful discipline of soul, but the aim of God's training is to break down self-confidence. Then, when the person at last goes out in service, he goes with the feeling, "Who am I?"

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Humility or Unbelief?

Commentators differ on how to read the question. Some see a right instinct that stops short. Others judge it harder, because Moses asks it after God has already decided.

That may look like humility in us, but it is not. When God has taken hold of us for a certain thing, to turn round and say, "Who am I, that I should do it?" is not humility. God raised no question as to who or what Moses was. If He chooses and sends, it does not matter who the person is.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Read alongside Moses' later excuses, this one fits a pattern.

Faced with the Lord's commands, he raised objections. On the surface they rested on humility, on distrust of men, and on distrust of himself. In short, they hid unbelief and the mistrust of the natural heart beneath an admirable outward appearance.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

God's Answer: His Presence

One writer traces the hesitation back to an earlier failure. Then notice what God does not say. He never tells Moses who he is. He answers with His own presence.

No doubt the memory of his earlier failure affected him. If a man acts in anything without God, he is sure to be discouraged, even when God is sending him. When lack of confidence and timidity led Moses to say, "Who am I," God's answer was, "But I will be with you." This should have been enough. If God is with me, it matters very little who I am, or what I am. When God says, "I will send you," and "I will be with you," He gives that servant full divine authority and divine power.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One writer makes this a rule for measuring any task God gives.

It is always a fatal mistake when we measure the difficulties of service by what we are. The question is what God is. Through the mists of our unbelief, difficulties look like mountains. To Him they are nothing but the occasion for displaying His almighty power.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Smallness as Qualification

Moses offered his own smallness as a reason to say no. God makes it the reason to choose him.

He had yet to learn that it is God's way to take up and use the very people who are little in their own eyes. Their littleness makes room for God to display His own power.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Two failures. Moses once ran without a call. Forty years later he refuses one. Nature errs both ways — too fast, then too slow.

- Half a lesson. Losing confidence in yourself is real progress. But stopping there keeps your eye on self, not on God.

- Not humility. Once God has chosen and sent you, asking who you are is distrust dressed in humility's clothes.

- The one answer. God never says who Moses is; He says, "I will be with you." If God is with us, who we are matters little.

- Littleness fits. The smallness Moses offered as an excuse is what God uses. It leaves room for His power to show.

Exodus 3:12 · Darby

And he said, For I will be with thee; and this shall be the sign to thee that I have sent thee when thou hast brought forth the people out of Egypt, ye shall serve God upon this mountain.

God has just told Moses to go to Pharaoh. Moses does not answer with eagerness. He asks, "Who am I?" God's reply says nothing about Moses. It offers His own presence, and a sign Moses will only see after he has obeyed.

"Who am I?"

The man who hesitates here once struck down an Egyptian. Forty years have passed, and commentators see the same man swinging to the opposite extreme.

We might expect that the moment God gave Moses His commission, his reply would be, "Here am I." But no. God had yet to bring him there... This is very unlike the man who forty years before "supposed that his brothers would understand that God was rescuing them by his hand." Such is man — at one time too hasty, at another time too slow. Moses had learnt a great deal since the day he struck down the Egyptian. He had grown in the knowledge of himself, and this produced hesitation and timidity. But then he clearly lacked confidence in God. If I am merely looking at myself, I shall do "nothing"; but if I am looking at Christ, "I can do all things."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Sender, Not the Sent

God never tells Moses that he is adequate. He moves the question off the man and onto Himself.

It is quite right that we should have a sense of our own utter nothingness... But it is also right that we should think much of God. For when He sends, it is not a question of what we are, but of what He is — and it is no small thing to be invested with His authority and power... The presence of the Lord was to be both the warrant for his mission and the source of his strength.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A low view of yourself is not the barrier to service it seems.

Moses objects that he himself is unfit. But this only brings the assurance that God is with him. Self-distrust need not be discouragement. In fact, the more complete it is, the more he will know God's all-sufficiency.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

A Sign on the Far Side of Obedience

The sign God gives (older translations read "token") is unusual: it lies at the end of the journey, not the start. Moses must go first and see the proof afterwards.

God then gives a sign, a token that He will be with him. But the sign would only come true after Moses obeyed. It was to strengthen him and gladden him once he had already obeyed.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

God added the token because Moses was slow to believe, and He has stooped to others in the same way.

Of course His promise to be with him guaranteed everything. But Moses was slow to believe it, so God stooped to give him a token. When God made the promise to Abraham, He took account of how frail our faith is. He confirmed His purpose with an oath, as Hebrews 6:17 reminds us. With Moses He did not confirm His word by an oath, but by a token — and that token came true later in this book.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Brought Out to Serve

The stated goal of the exodus is not merely escape from Pharaoh. It is worship at a particular place, and this becomes the refrain of the whole conflict that follows.

When He sent Moses to deliver Israel from Egypt, God said to him, "you shall serve God on this mountain" (Ex. 3:12). All through the struggle with Pharaoh the word was, "Let My people go, that they may serve Me." And when the people reached Sinai, the word was, "you shall serve the LORD your God" (Ex. 23:25). The law was given so that the people might know God's will for them, and serve Him by obeying it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Service also proves who did the rescuing.

For his encouragement God firmly assures him that the people he brings out will serve God on that mountain. This is the fruit of salvation, and the sign of who has worked in it: it brings the former slaves of sin back to Him in obedience.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

"This Mountain"

The mountain named is the ground where Moses is standing. The bush that shows God's care for a suffering people will later show them His glory.

The burning bush is now the symbol of God's constant care of Israel, even in the furnace of Egypt... And it is in connection with this mysterious bush that Horeb is first called "the Mount of God." For now the Lord first tells of Himself there... And this same spot which now testified of grace should later testify of glory to them, as the Lord says here to Moses.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Question — Moses asks "Who am I?" God says nothing about Moses. He points to what He Himself is.

- Presence — God's being with him serves as both the authority for the mission and the strength to carry it out.

- Sign — God puts the proof after the obedience. Moses must go on His word first and see it later.

- Purpose — Deliverance aims at service; "let My people go" is always followed by "that they may serve Me."

- Mountain — The bush that showed God's care marks the spot where the rescued slaves will worship. The promise ends where it began.

Exodus 3:13 · Darby

And Moses said to God, Behold, [when] I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say, What is his name? what shall I say unto them?

Moses stands at the burning bush with a commission he does not want, and he raises one more objection: what if the people ask God's name? The question sounds practical, but it exposes Israel's state after centuries in Egypt — and draws out a name that says what God is, not what He will do.

Why Moses Expected the Question

Moses was not inventing a problem. God sent him to people who had lived for centuries surrounded by other gods.

So in verse 13 we find him raising a great question as one more objection to what was proposed. The children of Israel had been in a land of idolatry for several centuries. So they knew the names of the false Egyptian gods well. Moses was to approach them in the name of the God of their fathers. But their minds were confused by everything around them. They would be sure to ask, What is His name?

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Dennett notes what Moses had already been told, and what the question suggests about Israel.

God had already revealed Himself to Moses as the God of his fathers, and this might have been enough. But nothing can ever satisfy doubts and fears. What a glimpse this gives of Israel's condition — that they might not know the name of the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob!

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A Heart Full of Questions

This is not Moses' first objection. The pattern says something about us, and more about God.

But Moses puts another question; for the human heart is full of questions… It is amazing to see how the human heart reasons and questions, when what it owes God is obedience without hesitating. More amazing still is the grace that puts up with all the reasoning and answers all the questions. Each question seems only to draw out some new feature of divine grace.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

God Answers With What He Is

God's reply in the next verse does not name a plan. It names a Person. (The ESV reads "I AM WHO I AM"; the quotations below use an older wording.)

There is great force in these words. It was not only what God was going to do. Man would probably have preferred "I shall do." But God takes His stand on these weighty words, "I AM THAT I AM" — the self-existing, ever-being One. In truth, everything hangs on Him. All others are only beings that exist. God is the only one who can say "I AM." Whatever exists was called into being, and it may pass out of existence, if God so chooses.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Behind the two English words lies a single Hebrew word.

The words "I AM" translate one Hebrew word, "Ehyeh." It comes from the same root as Jehovah. It clearly stresses the eternal nature and existence of the One who can speak this way. It is an unmistakable claim to deity.

Modernised from Robert F. WallOriginal wording

A Name Left Open for Every Need

Because the name states no single act, it excludes no need. Mackintosh sets it beside the other titles God takes in Scripture.

God unfolds all these gracious titles to meet the needs of His people. And when He calls Himself "I AM," that one title takes them all in. In taking this title, Jehovah was handing His people a blank cheque, to be filled in for any amount. He calls Himself "I AM," and faith has only to write beside that unspeakably precious name whatever we want. God is the only figure that counts, and human need may add the zeros. If we want life, Christ says, "I AM the life."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Name They Could Be Called By

God does not stop at His own being. He goes on at once to the name that ties Him to particular people — Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the ancestors of Israel.

"I AM" is His own essential name. But when it comes to how He governs the earth and relates to it, His name is the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob. That is the name every generation is to remember Him by. It gave Israel a very special place, now that God had visited them and taken them up under His name.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Same Name in the Gospels

Grant hears the same name on the lips of Jesus.

This name means that God is the self-existent, eternally existent One. With Him there is no question of past and future, as there is with us… The same name belongs just as much to the Lord Jesus. He uses it many times in the Gospel of John, and settles the matter with this declaration: "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am" (John 8:58). What a wonderful name to fill a believer's heart with adoration!

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Forgotten name. Israel had lived so long among Egypt's gods that Moses expected them to ask who the God of their fathers even was.

- Answered questions. Moses raised one more objection, yet each question drew out fresh grace instead of rebuke.

- Being, not doing. God did not say "I shall do" but "I AM" — the self-existent One on whom everything hangs. He called everything else into being.

- Blank cheque. Because the name names no single act, it covers every need; faith writes its own amount against it.

- Named for us. He adds the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as His memorial for every generation — and Jesus speaks the same "I AM" again.

Exodus 3:14 · Darby

And God said to Moses, I AM THAT I AM. And he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel I AM hath sent me unto you.

God sent Moses to a people who had lived for generations among Egypt's gods. Moses wanted to know what to say if they asked the name of the God who was sending him. God's answer does not describe what He does. It states what He is. Commentators find in that short phrase both the deepest truth about God and the most practical comfort for faith.

Why Moses asked the question at all

The request for a name was not idle curiosity. It exposed how far the nation had drifted during their years of slavery.

You know how they became slaves in Egypt. When Exodus, the second book of the Old Testament, opens, we see Abraham's descendants there. They were a great and mighty nation, but they were helpless slaves under the cruel rule of Pharaoh, Egypt's great king. But not only were they slaves, they had also forgotten the God who had chosen them and made them His own. They were idol-worshippers in Egypt (see Joshua 24:14). God's people had so far forgotten their God that they had even forgotten His great Name.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

The name of the Self-Existing One

The reply says nothing about what God does. It only says that He is. Commentators tie it to the name Jehovah — a name Abraham knew, but whose meaning God had not yet explained.

God had made Himself known to Abraham as Jehovah (Genesis 15:7). But here He explains that name. Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob knew the name Jehovah, but they did not know what it truly meant. He reveals Himself as the Self-Existing One, THE I AM THAT I AM. He is the One who is, who was, and who is to come (Rev. 1:4). And this wonderful Name — the Unchanging, Living One, the Eternal, the Name too deep to search out — is the Name of our Lord who has redeemed us.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The unchanging God and Israel's survival

God's being never shifts. So nothing in Israel's later history could shift His purpose for them. Their record went on to prove it.

He made Himself known as the great "I AM" — the One self-existent, ever-existent, unchanging, and therefore always true to what He is in Himself. Israel would prove to be an unstable and stubborn people. If they had been dealing with anyone other than "I AM," judgment would soon have swept them away. God was patient with them, and He will still achieve all His purpose for them, because He is always true to Himself. We should remind ourselves of this. We now know God far more closely, since Christ has revealed Him. But we do not lose the value of these earlier revelations. The One whom we know as Father is still the "I AM" to us, as much as He was to Moses and the children of Israel.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The ground of their rescue

The deliverance about to begin had no foundation in Israel's worthiness. Their only qualification was that they belonged to Him.

These words reveal a great and basic principle in God's ways. He always acts on the ground of what He is. "I AM" secures everything for "MY PEOPLE." He was never going to leave His people making bricks in Egypt, under the whips of Pharaoh's slave-drivers. They were His people, and He would act toward them in a way worthy of Himself.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A name left open for faith to fill in

God's other titles each answered one particular need. This one gathers them all up and stays open.

As we trace the different names God takes in Scripture, we find each one tied to the need of the people He was dealing with. "Jehovah-jireh" (the Lord will provide). "Jehovah-nissi" (the Lord my banner). "Jehovah-shalom" (the Lord sends peace). "Jehovah-tsidkenu" (the Lord our righteousness). All these gracious titles of His are unfolded to meet the needs of His people; and when He calls Himself "I AM," it includes them all. By taking this title, Jehovah handed His people a blank cheque for them to fill in for any amount... If we want life, Christ says, "I AM the life." If we want righteousness, He is "THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS." If we want peace, "He is our peace."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same name spoken in the Gospels

A writer links this verse with words Jesus spoke to those who opposed Him.

We do not wonder that He claims to be the self-existent One, as in His words to the Jews: "Before Abraham was I AM" (John 8:58). This is the name that belongs to God alone, the name He used when He revealed Himself to Moses and to Israel: "I AM has sent me to you" (Ex. 3:14). He has always been the Word, the One who makes God known, so that older voice was His own. He is the Abiding, the Unchangeable, the Eternal.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

A name tied to named people

Alongside this absolute name, God gave a second one. It ties Him to three named men.

"I AM" is His own essential name. But when it comes to how He rules the earth and deals with it, He takes another name. All generations are to remember Him as the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Forgotten. Slavery in Egypt had cost Israel even the memory of God's name, so Moses had to ask what to tell them.

- Revealed. God names Himself the self-existent One — who is, who was, and who is to come. That is what "Jehovah" had always meant, though Abraham was never told.

- Unchanging. He is always true to what He is, so judgment did not wipe out a stubborn nation. His purpose outlasts their failure.

- Given. Deliverance rests on what He is, not on what they were: "I AM" secures everything for "My people."

- Filled in. The name is a blank cheque — life, righteousness, peace — and the One who signed it said, "Before Abraham was, I AM."