Exodus 24:9–14

Exodus 24:9 · Darby

And Moses and Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel went up;

Moses has just sprinkled the blood that confirmed the covenant. Now a named group climbs the mountain, which raises two questions: why these men and not the whole nation, and how could sinful men go up at all?

A chosen company

This climb gave Israel a group of independent witnesses.

In obedience to verses 1–2 Moses, Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, together with 70 of the elders of Israel went up into the mountain (v. 9). This large group of witnesses took away any suspicion of the people that Moses might be in any way deceiving them.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Worship "afar off"

The law kept its worshippers at a distance. Two short phrases mark the gap between law and gospel.

We may search from end to end of the legal ritual, and not find those two precious words, "draw near." No one could hear such words from the top of Sinai, or among the shadows of the law. They could only be spoken at heaven's side of the empty tomb of Jesus. There the blood of the cross has opened a cloudless view to the sight of faith. The words "afar off" are as characteristic of the law as "draw near" are of the gospel. Under the law, the work was never done that could entitle a sinner to draw near.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why they were not struck down

God told Moses that no one can see His face and live. So what made this climb safe?

God declared in Exodus 33:20, "You cannot see My face; for man shall not see Me and live." Yet here Moses and his companions went up as representatives of the people. They ate and drank in the presence of the God of Israel. This was through special grace, granted on the ground of the blood sprinkling that had just taken place.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What they saw under His feet

Under His feet lay a pavement of sapphire stone. Its colour carries a message.

God had been revealing Himself at Sinai, as far as He could do so, for "No one has ever seen God" (John 1:18). But He shows something of His character, and does so in the symbolic way suited to the time of types and shadows. The elders of Israel go up the mountain. Beneath the feet of the God of Israel they see the pavement of sapphire stone, "like the very heaven for clearness." So the intense blue of the sapphire speaks of heaven.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Splendour, however, is not intimacy.

This was the showing of "the God of Israel" in light and purity, majesty and holiness. It was not the opening of the affections of a Father's heart. It was not the sweet tones of a Father's voice, breathing peace and putting confidence into the heart. No. The pavement of sapphire stone showed a purity and light no one could approach. It could only tell a sinner to keep away. Still, "they saw God and ate and drank." A moving proof of divine forbearance and mercy, and of the power of the blood!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Eating and drinking before God

Ordinary human life carried straight on in the presence of God.

This covenant, made on condition of the obedience of the people, was confirmed by blood (Ex. 24). The blood was shed, and death had in this way come in as God's judgment. Then the elders go up to enter into relationship with God. They see His glory, and continue their human and earthly life; they eat and drink.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Some writers draw a direct line from that meal to the believer's table today.

We can surely link this with the Lord's supper. It is our privilege then to draw near to God and to eat and drink in His presence. Just as the elders of Israel did, we should draw near with reverence and holy fear.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

The warning in two of the names

Nadab and Abihu stand in this honoured list. Their later story carries a warning.

Abihu and Nadab, sons of Aaron, with seventy of the elders of Israel, were invited to go up with Moses, where they saw God and ate and drank. They were set apart to serve the Lord as priests. Yet the first time they acted as priests for Israel, they offered strange fire that the Lord had not commanded. Fire from God struck them down. The case of Nadab and Abihu should teach us that not every kind of worship is acceptable to God.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Blood first. The climb follows the sprinkling. The sight of God rests on sacrifice, not on the worth of the men who went up.

- Blood permits. God had said that seeing Him would kill a man. Here special grace, resting on the blood, let these men see Him and live.

- Blood still limits. They worshipped "afar off." Distance marks the law, and "draw near" waits for the empty tomb.

- Blood feeds. They saw God and then ate and drank, human life continuing in His presence. Some read this as a picture of the Lord's supper.

- Blood does not excuse. Two men in this list later offered fire God never commanded, and they died. Nearness is no licence for worship we invent ourselves.

Exodus 24:10 · Darby

and they saw the God of Israel; and there was under his feet as it were work of transparent sapphire, and as it were the form of heaven for clearness.

Blood had just sealed the covenant. Now Israel's leaders climb the mountain, and the text says they saw the God of Israel — yet the Bible also says no one has ever seen God. What did they see? Why did they live through it? And what was the blue pavement under His feet saying?

What "they saw God" can mean

Commentators answer the puzzle by drawing a line. God's own being stayed hidden, but He showed Himself in a form men could bear.

They "saw the God of Israel," and this is not contradicted by 1 Timothy 6:16, which refers to God in His essential being and glory. Ezekiel saw "the likeness of the glory of the Lord" (Ezekiel 1:28). John on the island of Patmos saw One seated on the throne with "the appearance of jasper and carnelian" (Revelation 4:3). In the same way, these men saw God make Himself visible. We note that Scripture does not try to describe Him. It tells us only that what lay beneath His feet had the appearance of "paved," or "transparent" sapphire and the "clearness" of heaven.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Scripture says nothing about how God looked. Every detail falls on what lay under His feet.

They see the God of Israel — not as Moses did, "face to face" — and we must not guess at the vision. What Scripture dwells on for us is what lies "under His feet": the sapphire work, like the clear transparent depths of the heavens themselves... those endless depths hint at the infinite to our finite minds, yet God rises above them with His whole Being — they are only the footstool for His feet. This wonderfully reveals the One we still do not see; for there is no likeness of Him, and they saw none (Deuteronomy 4:12). Yet we have seen Him, amazing to say, in the likeness of the Son of Man! (Revelation 1:13)

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The colour of the pavement

This stone turns up at other key moments in Scripture.

When Moses and the elders went up into the mountain to God, "there was under his feet as it were a pavement of sapphire stone" (Exodus 24:10). In Ezekiel's vision, above the expanse, he saw "the likeness of a throne, in appearance like sapphire" (Ezekiel 1:26). It was one of the stones in the breastplate, and one that adorned the foundation of the holy Jerusalem. It is symbolic of heavenly glory... Probably an azure or sky-blue stone.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So how much of God did they see?

The elders saw God on His throne. In fact, they did not see much more than the foundation of the throne.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Purity that warns a sinner off

This sight revealed one side of God and held back another.

This was the manifestation of "the God of Israel," in light and purity, majesty and holiness. It was not a Father opening His heart, or the gentle tones of a Father's voice, breathing peace and giving confidence to the heart. No — the "pavement of sapphire stone" declared a purity and light no one could approach, and that could only tell a sinner to keep off.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why they were allowed near

They stood in that light and lived. The blood was the reason.

They saw the God of Israel. God displayed Himself in the majesty of His holiness to their gaze. The pavement of sapphire stone... and the added description, "like the very heaven for clearness," speak of heavenly splendour and purity... The blood was what let them in to this remarkable privilege. And it was a privilege to see the God of Israel and enter into relationship with Him — even though the whole character of what He revealed to them spoke of distance, not nearness.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

That distance did not stay fixed.

The people were far off, the leaders were not to come near, and had to worship from a distance. The blood of the Lord Jesus Christ, however, makes near, and we can draw near. The legal covenant always puts man at a solemn and guilty distance from God; the covenant of grace brings man near to God.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Where the sapphire leads

The same stone appears again in the foundations of the heavenly city.

The names of the apostles are engraved on the foundations of the Church, but Christ Himself is the true foundation... Then comes the stone on which the elders of Israel had seen God Himself standing.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Summary

- Blood first. They climbed only after blood had sealed the covenant. Their place before God rested on sacrifice, not on rank.

- Sight, but veiled. They saw God shown in a form they could bear, not His own being. They saw no likeness of Him then — we see Him now in the likeness of the Son of Man.

- Blue means heaven. The clear sapphire under His feet spoke of heavenly splendour and purity. They saw the foundation of a throne, not the One on it.

- Purity at a distance. That light told a sinner to keep off; it was majesty and holiness, not a Father's voice inviting confidence.

- Distance answered. The law kept people far off. The blood of Christ brings them near — and the same sapphire shines in the foundations of the heavenly city.

Exodus 24:11 · Darby

And on the nobles of the children of Israel he laid not his hand they saw God, and ate and drank.

Moses had just sealed the covenant at Sinai with sprinkled blood. Now a chosen group of Israel's leaders climbs the mountain into God's presence. What happens next is the surprise: no hand falls on them, and instead of dying they sit down to a meal.

Mercy Where Death Was Expected

God had already said that no one can see His face and live. That is what makes this scene so startling.

Exodus 24:9-11 opens a momentous scene before us. Two of its features prove it: "they saw the God of Israel" and "they saw God, and ate and drank." God had plainly said in Exodus 33:20, "You cannot see My face, for man shall not see Me and live." Yet here God granted special grace, on the ground of the blood sprinkling that had just taken place. So Moses and his companions, as representatives of the people, went up and ate and drank in the presence of the God of Israel. They stood before the holy God of Israel, yet God did not lay His hand in judgment on the nobles.

after_note: DELETE

An Outline of Sound Words

God showed them majesty and holiness here, not the warmth of a Father's love.

This was the manifestation of "the God of Israel," in light and purity, majesty and holiness. It was not the opening up of a Father's heart of love, or the sweet sound of a Father's voice, breathing peace and giving confidence to the heart. No; the paved work of sapphire stone spoke of that purity and light which no one can approach, and which could only tell a sinner to keep away. Still, "they saw God, and ate and drank." What a moving proof of God's patience and mercy, and also of the power of the blood!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What "They Saw God" Means

So how could they see God at all? Commentators answer by distinguishing God in His essential being from God showing Himself in visible form.

They "saw the God of Israel," and this does not contradict 1 Timothy 6:16, which refers to God in His essential being and glory... so these men saw God show Himself in visible form. Note that no one tries to describe Him. We are only told that what was under His feet looked like "paved," or "transparent" sapphire, with the "clearness" of heaven. To this extent they "saw God," and they kept enough strength of spirit to eat and drink before Him.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Meal as the Goal

The eating and drinking is not a footnote. It is where the first part of Exodus has been heading.

Chapter 24 brings us to the climax of the first part of Exodus. God had brought the people to Himself by redemption and had made His will known to them, and now their representatives go up into the mountain of God. Blood had ratified the covenant. They offered burnt offerings and peace offerings, but no sin offering... The sacrifices picture wholehearted devotion to the will of God, and the communion with Him that follows... We see how this thought of being with God in communion, pictured by eating and drinking before Him, completes the circle of truth connected with God's actions to bring a redeemed people to Himself.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Safety, Yet Still at a Distance

The scene grants real privilege, but the terms of that privilege still belong to the older order.

Moses alone was permitted to draw near before the covenant was established, but now the representatives of the people have this special grace given to them; and they draw near in safety... Moreover they ate and drank. It was in virtue of the blood that they were admitted to this remarkable privilege, for it was a privilege to see the God of Israel and enter into relationship with Him, even though the very character of the revelation given spoke of distance rather than nearness. Still, as men in the flesh they ate and drank in the presence of God, and, as another has remarked, "continued their earthly life." They saw God and did not die.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A Warning That Follows

Two of the men spared on that mountain do not survive their next recorded act of service.

Abihu and Nadab, sons of Aaron, with seventy of the elders of Israel, were invited to go up with Moses, where they saw God and ate and drank (Ex. 24:1, 9-11). They were set apart to serve the Lord as priests. Yet the first time they acted as priests for Israel, they offered strange fire, which the Lord had not commanded. Fire from God struck them down (Lev. 10:1-2)... The case of Nadab and Abihu should teach us that not every kind of worship is acceptable to God.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Table Today

Commentators see the same meal repeated whenever believers gather at the Lord's table.

What a beautiful picture this is of the Lord's supper, when we eat and drink in the presence of our God and Father and our Lord and Saviour! Gathered around the Lord's table we have the symbols of His dying love before us... It is a meal of fellowship with an exalted character. We are the guests at a meal prepared by our heavenly Host and He makes Himself known to us.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Summary

- Blood first. The sprinkled blood stands between these men and the death that seeing God should have cost them. It is the reason they could be there at all.

- Sight next. They saw God show Himself — sapphire, clearness, majesty — not His essential being and glory. No one tries to describe Him.

- Spared then. No hand fell on them. Commentators call this God's patience and mercy, not anything the nobles brought with them.

- Seated last. Eating and drinking completes the circle. Redemption was always aiming at communion, and the meal is where the chapter lands.

- Still guarded. What God showed them spoke of distance, not nearness. Nadab and Abihu show that being spared once is no licence to approach God on your own terms.

Exodus 24:12 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Come up to me into the mountain, and be there; and I will give thee the tables of stone, and the law, and the commandment that I have written, for their instruction.

God has just given Israel the law and sealed the covenant with blood. Now He calls Moses up the mountain alone, to receive that law in writing — but who may come that near, and what else did Moses receive there?

The mediator called up alone

Only one man could answer this summons. Israel watched from below, and what they saw on the mountain top was fire.

Near the end of the chapter Moses stands as mediator. God calls him to "Come up to me," so that he may receive from Him "the tables of stone, and the law, and the commandment that I have written, for their instruction." How solemn the moment was shows in this: "the appearance of the glory of Jehovah" was "like a consuming fire on the top of the mountain before the eyes of the children of Israel." Moses was alone with God for forty days and forty nights. As mediator he alone could come near God to receive the "tables of stone" — the "living oracles" Stephen spoke about in Acts 7. The glory the children of Israel saw was not the glory of God's grace. It was the glory of holiness, which suited the age of law.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Written by God, given to be taught

The verse stresses two things. God did the writing, and He gave it to Moses for a reason.

God Himself wrote "the law and the commandment" upon the stone tables, and Moses received these God-written words directly from Him, so that he could teach them. (Ex. 24:12.) We can imagine how carefully the men who were trusted with these sacred writings would guard them. Those written words are now in front of us in our Bibles, and their authority never changes.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

What the stones said

Writing from God is not the same as God making Himself known.

What was written on the two tables of stone was written by the finger of God. It set out what He required from the people the law was given to. It was not God revealing Himself. It was the lawgiver stating His demand on the people of Israel. He says to Israel, in effect, "You are to be that, or come under the curse." They were not that, and so they came under the curse.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

More than law was waiting on the mountain

The summons promised tables of stone, but Moses came away with far more than that.

Moses had pronounced the law, and had sprinkled the blood of cleansing as a symbol and picture. Now he is called (Exodus 24) to receive not only the law, engraved on stones, but also a much fuller revelation of God's care for His people: the provision of grace, based on the Lord's knowing in advance that they could not keep the law.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Being "there" with God, away from the camp, is what made the revelation possible.

He was called away from earth and earthly things. Set apart from natural influences, he is shut in with God, to hear from His mouth the deep mysteries of the Person and work of Christ; for that, in fact, is what is unfolded in the tabernacle and all its meaningful furniture — "the patterns of things in the heavens."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The waiting was itself a test

Moses stayed on the mountain for forty days. The length served a purpose down in the camp.

God did not need that long. In a moment He could have made Moses see it all and understand it all. Why then forty days? In the wisdom of God it was the time needed to test the people. Would they obey and wait patiently for the rules they had vowed to keep? They were so far from seeing the solemn responsibilities they had taken on that they did not even wait to hear them.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The result is startling. The tables Moses climbed the mountain to receive never reached the people.

Though the first tables of the law had been given to Moses, they never came into the camp. So Israel was never under absolute law. That would have meant death for all Israel.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

From stone to hearts

Stone lasts, but it stays outside a person. God's writing does not stop with stone.

The tables themselves were God's work, and the testimony cut into them was God's writing. In the coming day, under the new covenant, God will write the law in the hearts of the people. Right now the Spirit of God is writing not the law but Christ on the hearts of those who receive the Gospel. But here God's righteous demands on men were cut into stone.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Called — God speaks "Come up to me" to the mediator alone. The people stayed below, and the glory they saw was holiness, not grace.

- Written — God wrote the tables Himself and handed them to Moses to teach. Their authority has never changed.

- Demanded — that writing did not reveal God. It stated His demand: be this, or come under the curse.

- Given — Moses received far more than stone. He also received the patterns of the tabernacle and a provision of grace that already allowed for Israel's failure.

- Tested — the forty days tested whether Israel would wait. They did not. The first tables never entered the camp, and today the Spirit writes Christ on hearts.

Exodus 24:13 · Darby

And Moses rose up, and Joshua his attendant; and Moses went up to the mountain of God.

God calls Moses higher up the mountain, and one man goes up with him: Joshua, his assistant, last seen leading Israel's army in battle. How far did Joshua climb, and why does Scripture name him here at all?

The Mountain of God

The mountain Moses climbs already carries a name. Writers point out that this title runs through Exodus and always marks where God revealed Himself.

This mountain is described as "the mountain of God". We find the same expression in the book of Exodus, and it always has to do with God's revelation on Mount Sinai. Moses once led his father-in-law's flock through the desert to Horeb, the mountain of God. In the same way, he led the people of Israel through the wilderness to this mountain (Ex. 3:1; Ex. 18:5; Ex. 24:13). It was the mountain where God sat enthroned. He wanted to reveal Himself to the people He had rescued from slavery to be His special treasure. So we are on holy ground here and, like Moses, have to put off our shoes.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Joshua the Assistant

The verse calls Joshua the assistant of Moses; older translations say "minister." His name carries meaning too.

His name was at first Oshea, or Hoshea. Moses changed it to Jehoshua, and that was shortened to Joshua. It is the same name as Jesus in Greek, and it means "Jehovah the saviour." … We first hear of Joshua when he led the army against the Amalekites and beat them while Moses' hands were held up. Ex. 17:9. He is later called the "minister" of Moses, and in that role he went up with him into the mountain of God.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Only Moses Came Near

Joshua goes up, but the verse does not say how far. Writers stress that the climb narrowed at each stage, until only one man was left.

Moses was the only one who could draw near to God. He went up into the mountain, accompanied by his assistant Joshua (Ex. 24:13; cf. Ex. 32:17). But Moses alone went up higher to meet God and to speak with Him (Ex. 24:2, 12ff). We even read that after six days of waiting, Moses went into the cloud where God dwelt (Ex. 24:18).

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

How Far Joshua Climbed

Commentators differ on where Joshua stopped. Some read the account as leaving him partway up the slope.

Then God called Moses alone up into the mountain of God, though it seems Joshua went with him a little way. On the top of Sinai was the cloud of the Divine presence, and the glory of the Lord like a devouring fire. Moses went right into it and stayed there for forty days and nights.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Another writer sees no break in Joshua's presence at all.

Joshua had not been mentioned before this, but he had clearly come up with the group as the personal attendant of Moses. Now he goes on with Moses (v. 13), and he was clearly with him the whole time on the mountain.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

A Soldier Sent to School

Joshua first appears in Scripture on a battlefield. Here the same man stands in a very different place. One writer sees God's purpose in both.

This mention is brief, but it matters greatly. It shows us that this man of action was no stranger to the solemn and wonderful way the invisible God showed Himself. He not only learned how to fight the enemies of God's people; he also learned the realities of God's glory… In secret he was in communion with God's glory — as the Lord Jesus was, more perfectly still — but outwardly he was a warrior from his youth. In both ways God was forming him for later service. Communion with glory on the mountain was as necessary as the uncertain conflict on the battlefield.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Waiting as Preparation

Joshua's years of waiting on Moses were not wasted time. Where he stands now already points to what he would later do for Israel.

He was to be the redeemer of the inheritance, as Moses had been the redeemer of the heir. Through him God would finish what concerned Israel, as through Moses He had begun it. He was to lead Israel into Canaan, as Moses had led them out of Egypt. So beforehand we see him always with Moses. He waits on him… And this constant standing at Moses' side, waiting on him, was an early shadow of the ministry he would carry out as soon as his own day came.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Called — Moses does not climb on impulse. God calls him up the mountain where He had chosen to reveal Himself. It is holy ground.

- Companioned — Joshua goes up as Moses' attendant. His name means "Jehovah the saviour," the same name as Jesus in Greek.

- Limited — Only Moses entered the cloud. Commentators differ on how far Joshua climbed. All agree that Moses alone came into God's presence.

- Schooled — The warrior who fought Amalek now enters a different classroom: the glory of God. God was forming him in both for later service.

- Shaped — The years of waiting at Moses' side were an early shadow of Joshua's own ministry. He would finish for Israel what Moses began.

Exodus 24:14 · Darby

And he said to the elders, Wait here for us, until we return to you; and behold, Aaron and Hur are with you if any man have any matter, let him come before them.

Moses is about to go up into the cloud, out of sight. Before he goes, he leaves the elders at a fixed spot with a fixed instruction. It looks like a small piece of administration. But it raises the questions the next chapters answer. Who may come near to God? What happens to a people whose leader is out of sight? Will the men left in charge hold the trust?

The arrangement Moses leaves behind

Verses 13 and 14 leave the company in three parts. Moses climbs higher. Joshua goes with him. Everyone else stays put, with two men to go to if a dispute comes up.

Moses is now to be separated from Aaron, his sons and the 70 nobles. The Lord calls him up into the mountain to give him the tables of stone, on which God would write the ten commandments. Joshua had not been mentioned before, but he had clearly come with the group as the personal attendant of Moses. Now he goes with Moses (v. 13), and he was clearly with him the whole time on the mountain. Moses leaves instructions that Aaron and Hur are the ones to go to with any problems that might arise (v. 14).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Why only Moses went higher

Moses does not climb as one worshipper among many. He goes up as the man who stands between the two sides.

To be the mediator — or, as people say today, to 'broker a deal' — you need access to both sides. You also need to be able to relate to both of them. Here we find an illustration in the Old Testament: Moses was the mediator of the old covenant. Reading Exodus 24, you are struck by the way Moses is singled out as the mediator. He alone was allowed to draw near to God.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The two men named

Aaron and Hur are not picked at random. Israel had seen what these two did the last time Moses's strength ran out.

As long as the intercessor's hands were raised, Israel prevailed; but when they dropped, Amalek gained the advantage. As the day wore on, Moses's hands grew heavy. Then Aaron, the future high priest, with Hur — whose name means purity — made a seat for the intercessor. Supporting his hands, they kept them steady until the sun went down. So the day ended, and Israel, in the power of those uplifted hands, were more than conquerors.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Out of sight, still at work for them

"Until we return to you" is a promise, not a farewell.

Moses, hidden from the sight of the people, was still occupied with God for the people. At that very time he was receiving instructions from Jehovah for building the beautiful tabernacle, and setting up the priesthood they needed. He was still blessedly serving them, although they did not see him.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Commentators read the climb, and the promise to come back, as a picture of Christ.

As Moses went up, so our great High Priest has gone to the Father. We see Him not, but we know He is there and will come back again. May we live by faith during His absence and be kept from idols.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Waiting was the test

The order to stay was simple. Keeping it was not, and Israel's failure is drawn out as a warning for anyone whose Lord is out of sight.

Whatever is put into man's hand is always spoiled and lost. Unless divine things are held in faith, they will very soon give way. Instead of quietly waiting for Moses, as you and I have to wait for the Lord's return, the people became restless. We have to wait in faith. We have the Holy Spirit and the enjoyment of Christ, but outwardly we have nothing to show, and so the Christian's path is a path of faith.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The trust broken

The trust of verse 14 is the exact thing broken in chapter 32. Whoever brought a matter to Aaron got, in the end, a calf.

Think how much evil a good man can cause by acting unfaithfully in an emergency. Aaron was left in charge of the people, to meet any difficulty that might arise. But the leader falls in with what the people want, and leads them into idolatry without meaning to.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Mediator. One man went up. Moses alone was allowed to draw near, singled out as the go-between of the old covenant.

- Arrangement. He left the rest behind in order. The elders had a place to wait, and Aaron and Hur — the two who had held up his hands until Israel won — were there to handle whatever came up.

- Absence. He was still working for them while out of sight. Hidden in the cloud, he was receiving the plans for the tabernacle and the priesthood they needed.

- Test. The delay tested whether they would wait in faith for a man they could not see. Commentators apply it straight to waiting for the Lord's return.

- Failure. The man left in charge gave way. Aaron handed the people what they wanted, and led them into idolatry.