He that striketh a man, so that he die, shall certainly be put to death.
A single sentence sets the value God places on human life: to strike a man down is to forfeit your own life. Why is the penalty so absolute? Who may demand it? And does it still stand now that grace has come?
The command at Sinai did not invent the death penalty. Writers trace it back to the words God spoke to Noah after the flood.
This is not a new law. To Noah God had said, "Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in His own image" (Gen. 9:6). God said He would require the life of man at the hand of every man's brother. So He made man his brother's keeper. He guarded the man He had made in His own image by the most solemn penalty He could impose. Life belongs to Him, and He could not let anyone else trespass on what is His alone.
The crime is not just harm done to a victim. It touches the God whose image the victim bears.
The image of God expresses man's place and responsibility of representing God... The murderer does not only interfere with man and injure him to the last degree. By killing a man he also defaces God's image, and God sentences him to die. Murder is an unwarrantable seizing of what belongs to God. Only the death of the murderer upholds God's honour and maintains God's will.
The right to execute is not man's own. One writer traces it back to God.
God's command gave it being, so it can never stop carrying His authority, whether men listen or refuse to listen. One part of the charge stands out above the rest: man is responsible to put to death the one who sheds man's blood... So the idea that this is in any way a right belonging to man is cut off. It is a right of God. Ever since the flood He has been pleased to entrust it to human keeping. Those in authority are bound to enforce it in subjection to Him, and one day they must give account to Him for how they used it.
The murderer had nowhere to hide. Not even God's altar could shelter him.
Life belongs to God. As the Giver of life He exercises His right: He demands the life of the one who has taken a life he cannot restore. The sentence cannot be reduced. Even if a murderer took hold of God's altar, it would do him no good. Joab's case shows this (1 Kings 2:28-34).
Commentators agree that it does not. They point to what the New Testament says about civil authority.
The New Testament reminds us that the earthly authority "does not bear the sword in vain" (Rom. 13:4). This shows that the coming of grace in Christ has not cancelled what God has established about government in the earth. Authorised government takes its course, but murder is strictly forbidden.
Dennett answers a common objection: does the Sermon on the Mount set this law aside?
The word of God gives no support to the modern movement to abolish the death penalty. It substitutes human ideas in the place of God's original law. In fact, it exalts man over God. Our Lord's directions in the Sermon on the Mount (Matt. 5:38-48) apply only to relationships among fellow-subjects of His kingdom, not to those between man and man. So they in no way set aside the command given to Noah.
The next verse makes room for the man who did not lie in wait. One writer follows that opening to the cross.
Apply these laws to what the Jewish nation did to Christ. They did "lie in wait," and in the end they used bribery and cunning to secure His arrest and condemnation. It might seem that no escape was possible for them. But our Lord Himself prayed, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do" (Luke 23:34). So if they repent, God in grace will count it as ignorance on the ground of that prayer, and give them a city of refuge for escape and safety... Grace can relieve from the penalty of the law, on the ground of the atonement for sin that Christ worked out by His death.
- Cause — The law does not start at Sinai. It starts with Noah, and its reason is that God made man in His own image.
- Claim — Life belongs to God. The murderer trespasses on what is God's alone, and defaces the image God placed in man.
- Charge — The sword is not man's by right. It is God's right, entrusted to those in authority, who must answer to Him for how they use it.
- Closure — No refuge for the guilty. Even gripping God's altar did not save Joab. The sentence cannot be reduced.
- Compassion — Grace has not cancelled government (Rom. 13:4). Yet on the ground of Christ's atonement, grace can still lift the law's penalty from those who repent.
But if he have not lain in wait, and God have delivered [him] into his hand, I will appoint thee a place to which he shall flee.
A murderer must die. But this verse turns to a different man: he did not lie in wait, God "let him fall into his hand," and God appoints him a place to run to.
This death sentence is not new at Sinai. It goes back to God's word to Noah, and it rests on what man is.
To Noah God had said, "Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image." He would demand the life of man from every man's brother. So man was made his brother's keeper. God protected the one He had made in His own image by the most solemn penalty He could exact. Life belongs to Him, and so He could not allow another to trespass on His prerogative.
Against that background, this verse opens a door. The laws on the cities of refuge fill it out later, and show why God gave it: an avenger would be chasing the killer with a hot heart.
There is, however, in Exodus 21:13 a notable exception made. Deuteronomy 19 and Numbers 35 deal with this provision in fuller detail, where they speak of the cities of refuge. How precious is the grace and the compassion of the heart of God, expressed in Deuteronomy 19:6! The avenger of blood, with his heart hot, must not overtake the manslayer and strike him down because the road is long — when he did not deserve to die, since he had not hated him beforehand.
The verse does not treat the death as chance: God let it happen. Commentators carry that phrase forward to the death of Christ.
How often had they sought to take Jesus! But this could not happen until God Himself delivered Him into their hands. So Jesus said to Pilate, "You would have no authority over me at all unless it had been given you from above." In grace their terrible deed is not regarded as wilful. It is attributed to God having delivered up Jesus by His determinate counsel and foreknowledge (Acts 2:23).
Applied to Israel, the wording looks like a closed door: their plotting was deliberate. What opens it is the prayer of Christ.
Apply these statutes to the action of the Jewish nation against Christ. Remember how they did "lie in wait," and how they at last succeeded by bribery and cunning in getting Him arrested and condemned. It might seem as if there were no possible escape for them. But our Lord Himself prayed, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do." So God in grace, if they repent, will count it ignorance in them on the ground of this intercession, and appoint them a city of refuge for escape and safety… Grace can relieve from the penalty of the law, on the ground of the atonement for sin that the death of Christ worked out.
"I will appoint for you a place" — the refuge is God's provision, not man's idea. Writers apply it to the reader.
God Himself provided the cities of refuge; He would not have the manslayer treated as a murderer; nor will He have you treated as guilty of the murder of His Son, if you flee to Christ, the refuge He has provided in the richness of His mercy. The manslayer's hope was liberty through the death of the High Priest; those God shelters now hope to enter His presence and glory at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
One condition remains: the man must match the verse's description. If he does, the shelter is as strong as the God who gave it.
Here we have a very exact description of the man for whom God provided the city of refuge. If he did not answer to it, the city was not for him. But if he did, he might feel the most perfect assurance that a gracious God had thought of him. God had found a refuge for him, where he might be as safe as the hand of God could make him. Once the slayer found himself inside the city of refuge, he might breathe freely… No avenging sword could reach him there, not a hair of his head could be touched there.
- Blood — the death penalty for murder rests on man being made in God's image. Life belongs to God, and He lets no one trespass on that right.
- Exception — if the killer did not lie in wait, God steps between him and the hot-hearted avenger. The man "did not deserve to die."
- Hand — the killing is not chance: God let him fall into his hand. So with Jesus: men seized Him only when God delivered Him up by His determinate counsel.
- Refuge — Israel plotted, yet the prayer "Father, forgive them" opened a way. Grace counts it ignorance and appoints them a place, on the ground of the atonement.
- Safety — the man who answers to the exact description is as safe as the hand of God can make him. Flee to Christ, and God will not treat you as guilty of His Son's death.
But if a man act wantonly toward his neighbour, and slay him with guile, thou shalt take him from mine altar, that he may die.
Exodus 21 moves from the ten commandments into case law. Here God separates a death that happens from a death someone plans. The previous verse promised a place to flee for the man who did not lie in wait. This verse takes that refuge away from the man who did.
The verse turns on two words: willfully and by cunning. Both mark the killing as planned:
Whoever was guilty of murder was himself to be put to death. Whatever people may say today against the death penalty in cases of proven murder, at least they cannot say it is unjust. But if the case was not deliberate murder but manslaughter, the law provided a city of refuge where the guilty man could flee for safety. On this, see Deuteronomy 19:1-3. But where the murder was premeditated, the penalty was death (v. 14).
This was not a fresh rule invented at Sinai. It reaches back to the command given to Noah after the flood, and rests on what man is — a creature made in God's image:
To Noah God had said, "Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in His own image" (Genesis 9:6). He would demand the life of man from every man's brother. So man was made his brother's keeper. God guarded the one He had made in His own image with the most solemn penalty He could exact. Life belongs to Him, and He could not allow anyone else to take what is His alone... For wilful murder there was no release from the penalty, even if the murderer had fled for protection to God's altar.
A frightened man could grip the horns of the altar and plead for his life. This verse breaks that grip. Joab, David's army commander, found that out:
Joab flees to the tabernacle and takes hold of the horns of the altar. That cannot save him. The Word of God is against him: "But if a man willfully attacks another to kill him by cunning, you shall take him from my altar, that he may die" (Ex. 21:14). Solomon remembers this. Once Joab's judgment is settled, it is too late for the altar to shelter him.
The same place gave opposite outcomes to two men in the same crisis:
In Scripture horns stand for strength... The horns of the altar suggest that everything the altar stood for came to a point here, focused and intensified... It also explains the significance of a guilty man coming here for refuge and laying hold of them. Adonijah sought safety there and found it (1 Kings 1:50). Joab, at the same place of asylum, met the just reward of his sins (1 Kings 2:28-34).
Joab's failed grip carries a warning far past ancient Israel:
The horns of the altar became a place of refuge. No one could break into that sanctuary. It sheltered everyone who had a right to its protection on the ground of the sprinkled blood. Joab sought this protection when he fled from Solomon (1 Kings 2:28). But he had no claim on it, for he was a murderer, and Solomon had him killed. It is the same with a sinner in desperate trouble. He would gladly claim the benefits of the death of Christ to escape judgment, while his heart is still far from Him. But where someone truly trusts the value of that sacrifice, no power in earth or hell can touch the soul that rests under its shelter.
The exception in the previous verse — the man who did not lie in wait — is where mercy enters. One commentator applies it to the nation that condemned Christ:
Apply these statutes to what the Jewish nation did against Christ. They did "lie in wait," and in the end they succeeded by bribery and trickery in having Him arrested and condemned. It might seem there was no escape for them. But our Lord Himself prayed, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do" (Luke 23:34). So God in grace, if they repent, will count it as ignorance on the ground of that prayer. He will appoint them a city of refuge for escape and safety. So Peter, preaching to them, said, "I know that you acted in ignorance, as did also your rulers" (Acts 3:17). Grace can relieve from the penalty of the law, on the ground of the atonement for sin made by the death of Christ.
- Life — the rule goes back to Noah and Genesis 9:6: life belongs to God, and man carries God's image.
- Intent — the law weighs what was in the heart first: no ambush means a place to flee; ambush and guile mean death.
- Altar — the sanctuary that saved Adonijah did not save Joab; a place of mercy is no hiding place for a murderer.
- Faith — a heart still far from God can clutch at Christ's death and gain nothing; the sprinkled blood shelters only those who trust it.
- Grace — the exception is Israel's hope: Christ's own prayer lets God count their act as ignorance, and His atonement covers it.
And he that striketh his father, or his mother, shall certainly be put to death.
God's law places a blow against a parent alongside murder and kidnapping, in a short list of crimes carrying the death sentence. Why does God treat a blow against a father or mother so seriously? The answer the commentators give turns on the authority parents carry.
This verse sits in a group of offences that all carry the same sentence. Writers trace the principle back long before the law was given.
Exodus 21:12-17 lists certain offences that carry the death penalty, and murder is named among them. But this is no new law, as Genesis 9:5-6 plainly shows. God alone knows the heart of man, and He has called it "deceitful above all things and incurably wicked." When He gave Noah the government of the earth, He made provision for guarding man's life in the most solemn terms — terms no human laws can set aside.
The verse does not describe a killing. One writer lists the kinds of people the law was made for. His list names the act in view here.
The law is made for the lawless and unruly, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who beat their fathers and those who beat their mothers… the fourth pair is violent contempt for parents, stopping short of killing. Compare Ex. 21:15.
Striking a parent and cursing a parent (v. 17) carry the same sentence. The reason given is that the authority parents hold is not their own.
Both striking and cursing father or mother (vv. 15, 17) carried the same penalty. In this way God set up parental authority under the holy sanctions of His law, and He required children to treat it with reverence. Disobedience to parents is given as one sign of the dangerous times of the last days (2 Tim. 3:2). That shows how highly God values the subjection of children to their parents. For it is God's authority that parents represent, and so that authority is absolute when it is used for God. It demands full and unconditional obedience. (See Deut. 21:18-21; Eph. 6:1; Col. 3:20.) So these sins are grave ones. But if striking and cursing earthly parents deserves death, how much worse is open rebellion against God.
after-note: DELETE
Commenting on a similar law about parents, one writer traces the act to its root.
Setting up one's own will against a parent's authority is akin, in a lower way, to renouncing the true God for a false one.
Another writer puts the same truth positively. He points past the command to the order behind it.
This is not only God's authority giving commands, nor even His statements about where actions lead. It is the order He has set up in the relationships He established among people, above all the place of parents. To be subject to them is really to own God in His order. It is the first commandment with promise.
The sentence is severe. One writer says so plainly, then sets it against what all sin earns.
We also see the severity of God on display in the law. It passes the death sentence on sins that people today do not count worthy of death — verses 15, 16 and 17, for instance. Yet we must remember that the wages of sin — of all sin — is death.
Christians do not live under this legal code. Yet the duty it guarded still stands — and one writer says grace lifts it higher.
Believers in Christ are not under law but under grace. That does not free us from these obligations, because the great point to press is obedience to a God-given authority. Under grace, as Paul teaches in his letter to the Ephesians, we rise higher in keeping these things, since heavenly motives now move us.
- Order. Parents hold a place God assigned. Obeying them is owning the order God set up among people.
- Blow. The verse targets violent hands laid on a father or mother — violent contempt for a parent, stopping short of killing.
- Weight. God set the same penalty on striking a parent and on cursing one. The act stands beside murder and kidnapping in Exodus 21:12-17.
- Depth. Setting your own will against a parent's authority is, in a lower way, kin to renouncing the true God for a false one.
- Today. Grace does not cancel the claim; it lifts it. Scripture names disobedience to parents as a mark of the last days.
And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall certainly be put to death.
One sentence in Israel's civil code puts kidnapping on the same level as murder. Why does God guard a person's freedom with the death penalty? What does that say about the worth He places on a human being?
This law sits in a block of rulings that follow the ten commandments. They cover everyday life among the people. One writer sees the whole set as a mark of God's care, not cold legislation:
This section holds the various "judgments" or statutes that God gave to govern His people in all their relationships… They give a striking view of God's care for everything that touched the walk and ways of His people. And if penalties are attached to breaking these laws, that only fits the arrangement He had now set up.
These rulings open out the ten commandments. This chapter works from one of them in particular:
If in Exodus 21 we get judgments which give an extension to "You shall not murder," we find in Exodus 22 judgments giving an extension to "You shall not steal."
The verse closes two doors at once. The sale is not what makes the crime. Still holding the victim is enough.
The law's demands were most stern, as verse 15 shows… A kidnapper also was to be put to death, whether he had sold his victim or whether he held him as a captive (v. 16).
Commentators trace this severity back to God's word to Noah, long before Sinai:
Exodus 21:12-17 lists certain offences that carry the death penalty, and murder is named among them. But this is no new command, as Genesis 9:5-6 clearly shows. When God gave Noah the government of the earth, He provided for the preservation of man's life in the most solemn terms, which no human laws can set aside… Life belongs to God. As the Giver of life He requires the life of anyone who has taken a life he cannot restore, and the sentence cannot be softened.
The law treats stealing a person as an attack on life itself. A human being is not a thing to be moved and priced. Even a sinner, whose case before God is unsettled, carries a value no one may trade on.
Man-stealing and man-selling — slavery in fact, as still practised in many parts of the world — also carried the penalty of death (v. 16). A man may be a sinner. God has claims on him too, claims that must be met before he can be delivered. Even so, he is of such value in God's sight that his fellow man must treat his liberty as sacred. How astonishing that professed followers of Christ could defend slavery in its worst forms — stealing, selling, and holding men as mere property — with such a scripture in front of them, and within living memory!
One comment pairs this law with a rule about lending, and names the motive behind both:
A creditor might take a pledge from his poor neighbour, but not the hand-mill that ground his grain day by day. That would be taking a man's life as a pledge. And the greed that would go so far as to steal the man himself was to be punished with death.
The New Testament condemns the same crime. It also changes how a Christian master must see the person he owns.
Paul sent Onesimus, a runaway slave, back to his master, who was a Christian, and did not demand his release. Instead he beautifully puts it to Philemon that he should have Onesimus no longer as a slave, but as a beloved brother… Christianity taught equal treatment of slaves, as we see in several of the letters in which masters are addressed: "men-stealers" are condemned. 1 Timothy 1:10.
- Setting — The verse sits among the "judgments" that follow the ten commandments. These rulings show God's care for every relationship among His people.
- Ground — The death penalty is not new law. It rests on what God said to Noah, in terms no human law may set aside.
- Crime — Selling the victim and holding him both carry the same sentence. A kidnapper has no safe halfway point.
- Reason — God values a person so highly that his liberty is sacred, even while he is still a sinner with matters unsettled before God.
- Reach — Greed is the root the law strikes at. The New Testament condemns "men-stealers" too, and treats a slave as a brother, so no one can defend slavery from Scripture.
And he that curseth his father, or his mother, shall certainly be put to death.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.