And Moses went up to God, and Jehovah called to him out of the mountain, saying, Thus shalt thou say to the house of Jacob, and tell the children of Israel
Three months out of Egypt, Israel pitched camp in front of a mountain, and Moses climbed it while the nation waited below. What God said from that mountain, and the two names He used, set the terms for the rest of Israel's history.
Everything up to this point had run on God's free grace. One writer marks this chapter as the start of a new dispensation — a new order in God's dealings with His people.
These chapters begin a new dispensation. Up to the end of chapter 18 grace reigned, and it shaped all God's dealings with His people. But from this point on they were put, with their own consent, under the strict requirements of law. Sinai is the expression of this dispensation, and so is tied to it for all time… Grace had already searched them, and found nothing but disobedience, rebellion, and sin; and now they were to be tested by law. This has been God's object in all His dispensations — to test, and so to reveal, what man is. But — blessed be His name — if He has exposed the incurable corruption of our nature, He has revealed at the same time what He is. He taught that, if man is completely ruined and lost, help and salvation are to be found in Him, and in Him alone.
The climb was not Moses' own idea. God called him up, and the call had a purpose.
God called Moses up into the mountain, so that he might receive a fresh proposal from Him and carry it to the people.
God names the same people twice in one sentence — first after Jacob, then by the name Israel. One writer hears a distinct reminder in each name.
God reminds them of His mercies… This is God's emphatic way of putting before them the two things — grace and law. Would they accept all as the gift of grace, or risk all upon their obedience? "Say to the house of Jacob" should have reminded them of Jacob's failures — they were of his house, and would fail just as he did. "Tell the people of Israel" should also have told them, loud and clear, that God gave the name "Israel" — prince — in pure grace. All Israel's prosperity was due to grace alone. The same grace was there for them. Their choice was a sad one.
God does not start with a demand. He points them back to what He had already done.
There are two things in the message which the Lord commissioned Moses to carry to the people. First, He reminds them of what He had done for them. He does it in a way that should have taught them their own complete helplessness, and that all their resources were in God… He had rescued them from Pharaoh and destroyed him and his armies. He had carried His people by His might, brought them to Himself, and given them a place of nearness and relationship. He had done everything for them, and He appeals to their own knowledge in proof of it.
One writer points to the destination in that line: not a land, but God Himself.
"I bore you on eagles' wings and brought you to Myself." This is the foremost thought in the salvation of God. In time they would indeed learn that the same work had brought them to the land they longed for. But this was the basis of every blessing right through to the end.
The offer Moses carried down had a condition attached. One writer sets it beside Peter's letter, where the same titles come with no condition at all. (The quote below follows an older translation; the ESV reads "treasured possession" and "a chosen race.")
In Exodus the people were to be "a peculiar treasure," "a kingdom of priests," "a holy nation" — but only if they truly obeyed God's voice. In Peter, Christians of Jewish background are reminded what they are, without any "if." They are "a royal priesthood," "a holy nation," "a peculiar people" — three things almost identical with the three things of Exodus. But they are also a fourth thing, which does not appear in Exodus. They are "a chosen generation," and that made a difference of immense importance. They were a new generation of God's choice — a born-again people.
- Grace first. Up to Sinai, God had dealt with Israel in pure grace. From this chapter on, by their own consent, they stand under law.
- Grace remembered. The message Moses carries begins with what God had already done. It appeals to what the people had seen with their own eyes, not to what they might yet achieve.
- Grace named. "House of Jacob" recalls an ancestor who failed. "People of Israel" recalls a name — prince — given as a pure gift. Both names urged them to choose grace.
- Grace tested. The offer that follows turns on a single "if." Israel took the risk, staking everything on their own obedience.
- Grace secured. In Peter the same three titles come back with no "if" attached. A fourth is added: a chosen, born-again people.
Ye have seen what I have done to the Egyptians, and [how] I have borne you on eagles' wings and brought you to myself.
God's first word to Israel at Sinai is not a command but a record. Before He asks anything, He tells them what they had already watched Him do — and where it had brought them.
Between the Red Sea and Sinai, God had given without conditions. Only after that reminder does the tone change.
Here a huge change was taking place in Israel's position. Until then the promise made to them had no conditions. Look over chapters 15 to 19. You will find that God had given them everything freely, even while they complained — the manna, water to drink, the sabbath, and so on. He had also supported them in their fight with Amalek at Rephidim. He reminds them of all this: "You yourselves have seen," He says to them, "how I bore you on eagles' wings and brought you to Myself; now therefore, if…" This is the first time in God's dealings with Israel that the little word if appears.
The picture is not of a rescue in which Israel helped. The whole force of the image is that no other strength was involved.
These words point to divine power. In the deliverance out of Egypt God jealously shut out every other power. Israel was to learn the grace and might of a Saviour-God.
The wings did not carry Israel over the wilderness. They set them down in it — tested, and alone with the God who had carried them.
He brought Israel into the wilderness to have them completely alone with Himself. There He could teach them what He was. As He said later: "You yourselves have seen what I did to the Egyptians, and how I bore you on eagles' wings and brought you to Myself." He lets us pass through these trials so that we may fully understand that everything there comes from God. The eagle's wing never tires or fails.
Notice where the flight ends: not at a place, but at God Himself. The cross is given the same purpose.
Then we find redemption — the active intervention of God to make good the promises made. We do not now have a promise of something still to come, but actual deliverance, as Exodus 19:4 says. Peter says the same in 1 Peter 3:18: "For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God." The work done to put away sin is so complete that now not one thing stands — morally, I mean — between God and the one who has part in it.
Being brought near was itself the privilege. It is what set Israel apart from the peoples around them.
Israel's special privilege was nearness to God: He "brought you to Myself." Compared with all the nations around them, this gave Israel a priestly standing before God.
The order matters. God rescued first and asked obedience second, and the law itself opens by naming the rescue.
In the very giving of the law, God spoke these words: "I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery." The ways of God are very precious; God must be true to Himself. He did not command obedience so that they might be redeemed, but because they were redeemed.
Israel now had to choose the ground they would stand on. The wording of the message carried a warning they missed.
This is God's emphatic way of putting before them the two things — grace and law. Would they accept everything as the gift of grace, or risk everything on their obedience? "Say to the house of Jacob" should have reminded them of Jacob's failures. They belonged to his house, and they would fail just as he did. "Tell the children of Israel" should have told them in the loudest tones that God gave the name Israel — which means prince — in pure grace.
- Seen — God starts with evidence, not demand. Israel had watched Him supply manna, water and victory, with no conditions attached.
- Carried — the eagle's wings mean power with no partner. Israel added nothing to the rescue, and that wing "never tires or fails."
- Brought — the flight ends at God Himself. The cross has the same goal: Christ suffered "that he might bring us to God."
- Near — this nearness was Israel's one distinction among the nations. It gave them a priestly standing before God.
- Then tested — only now comes the first if. God asked obedience because they were redeemed, never so that they might be.
And now, if ye will hearken to my voice indeed and keep my covenant, then shall ye be my own possession out of all the peoples -- for all the earth is mine --
God has carried Israel out of Egypt and brought them to Sinai. Now He makes them an offer that turns on one small word: if.
God had given everything from the Red Sea to this mountain freely, without terms. One word changes that.
Here was an immense change taking place in the state of Israel: until then the promise made to them had been unconditional. Look over chapters 15 to 19. You will find that God had given them all things freely, even though they murmured — the manna, water to drink, the sabbath, and so on. He had also sustained them in their fight with Amalek at Rephidim. He recalls all this to their memory. "You have seen," He says to them, "how I bore you on eagles' wings and brought you to Myself; now therefore, if …" This is the first time, in the relationship between God and Israel, that the little word if appears.
Israel had already heard this voice. One writer asks what it had been saying.
Notice, it is "My voice" and "My covenant." What was the utterance of that "voice"? and what did that "covenant" involve? Had the Lord's voice spoken to lay down the rules of a severe and unbending lawgiver? Not at all. It had spoken to demand freedom for the captives. It had spoken to provide a refuge from the sword of the destroyer, and to make a way for the ransomed to pass over. It had spoken to bring down bread from heaven and to draw water out of the hard rock.
The same writer explains "My covenant" as the promise God had already made to Abraham.
And as to His "covenant," it was one of unmixed grace. It proposed no condition. It made no demands. It put no yoke on the neck, no burden on the shoulder… His word to Abraham was, "I WILL GIVE." The land of Canaan was not to be bought by man's doings. It was given by God's grace.
One writer weighs the reply Israel's recent history should have produced against the answer they gave.
They could not have forgotten what had already happened. In the short three months since they crossed the Red Sea, they had sinned again and again. Every fresh difficulty had only shown their failure and sin. So if they had gone over their past experience, they would have seen that accepting these new terms would cost them everything. They would surely have said to one another, "We have disobeyed time after time. We fear the same thing might happen again, and then we forfeit everything. No; we must throw ourselves without reserve on that same grace which has saved, led and preserved us." But instead they accepted the condition at once and said, "All that the Lord has spoken we will do." Their past experience counted for nothing… Their own felt helplessness should have made them cling to what God was for them, which is grace. Instead they foolishly offered to make everything depend on what they could be for God, which is the principle of law.
Older versions read "a peculiar treasure" where the ESV has "my treasured possession." The phrase speaks of ownership.
You could translate this expression as "My own possession." God used those very words of His people (see Exodus 19:5), if only they would hear His voice and keep His covenant.
God's claim on one nation rests on His claim to everything.
When Abraham's nation appeared, the Lord had chosen them to be His witnesses. He put them in possession of a portion of the earth, to hold it under Him as their Lord. This showed that He, who took whatever portion He pleased, had title to the whole. Israel, established as God's people, should have stayed among the nations yet formally separate from them, reflecting the light of God's glory as King of all the earth.
Israel broke the condition, so this promise was never made good.
Because of the people's transgressions under the first covenant, this purpose of God was never realised. That did not cancel it. It still holds good that the Lord "has chosen Jacob for Himself, and Israel for His peculiar treasure" (Ps. 135:4).
Another writer follows what Israel's failure means for believers now.
Had Israel obeyed the voice of God and kept His covenant, they would have been to God "a peculiar treasure", a kingdom of priests and a holy nation (Exodus 19:5-6). They failed. The nation was set aside, and believers are now seen as taking the place of Israel as a witness to God before the world.
- Grace first. God gave Israel everything from Egypt to Sinai freely, even while they murmured. Until now His promise carried no terms.
- The first "if." This verse brings the first condition into God's dealings with Israel. The whole blessing now hangs on it.
- Grace or law. The voice they had to obey had already freed them, sheltered them and fed them. Still they staked everything on what they could do for God, not on what God was for them.
- Treasure means owned. "Treasured possession" means God's own possession. He can say it because the whole earth is already His.
- Broken, not withdrawn. Israel broke the condition, yet God's choice of them stands. Believers now hold that witness before the world.
and ye shall be to me a kingdom of priests, and a holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak to the children of Israel.
God tells Moses what the rescued nation is meant to become, and He attaches an "if" to it. Two questions follow. What does it mean for a whole people to be priests? And why did this offer never take effect?
The title reaches back to verse 4: God brought them to Himself. Priesthood, at its root, is the ability to come close.
Priesthood was what God proposed to Israel. It was what He had in mind in connection with redemption... This was His original thought for them, and He held to it all through, although it could not be carried out then. In Christianity the redeemed are in fact priests, as the apostle to the Jewish people shows. "I brought you to Myself," fully realised, is priesthood in at least one of its essential characters: the ability to draw near to God. "The priests who come near to the LORD" (Ex. 19:22) is one of the earliest titles describing them.
The second title is not decoration. It is the condition that makes the first possible.
For this, holiness was an absolute requirement. A "kingdom of priests" implies a "holy nation." And so in Israel the official nearness was only outward, because the holiness was so largely outward. God was, as we know, teaching spiritual truths by means of outward representation. In Christianity we have the substance of these shadows.
Until now everything had been given freely. This chapter marks the turning point in how God dealt with the nation.
Here was an immense change taking place in the state of Israel: until then the promise made to them had been unconditional. If you look over chapters 15 to 19, you will find that God had given them all things freely, even despite their murmurings — the manna, water to drink, the sabbath, and so on. He had also sustained them in their fight with Amalek at Rephidim. He recalls all this to their memory, and then adds: "now therefore, if…" This is the first time in the relationship between God and Israel that the little word if appears.
The offer speaks of "my voice" and "my covenant." Mackintosh presses on what that voice had actually been saying up to that moment.
Notice, it is "my voice" and "my covenant." What did that voice say? Had it made itself heard to lay down the rules and regulations of a severe and unbending law-giver? By no means. It had spoken to demand freedom for the captives, and to provide a refuge from the sword of the destroyer. It had spoken to make a way for the ransomed to pass over, to bring down bread from heaven, and to draw water out of the hard rock. These were the gracious, clear words of the LORD's voice, right up to the moment when "Israel camped before the mount."
Mackintosh weighs the words the people chose in reply.
Israel was not willing to take this blessed position. Instead of rejoicing in God's "holy promise," they made the most presumptuous vow that human lips could utter. All the people answered together and said, "All that the LORD has spoken we will do." This was bold language. They did not even say "we hope to do" or "we will try to do." That would have expressed some measure of self-distrust. But no; they took the most absolute ground.
The priesthood then narrowed to one family.
Israel never became a "kingdom of priests" under the law. The choice of Aaron and his family afterwards shows this fully. The people as a body were shut out of the priesthood. For anyone not of Aaron's line, entering the priestly office meant death.
The same wording returns in the New Testament, applied to believers. Kelly marks both the echo and the difference.
It is a clear allusion to Exodus 19. It follows the Hebrew idiom in the true reading: not exactly "kings and priests" here, but "a kingdom, priests." There is of course this essential difference. There it was only an offer, conditional on Israel's legal obedience. Here grace has given us the position.
The promise is not cancelled. Fereday points to a day when Israel holds the place it lost.
In that day Israel will stand in priestly nearness to God, compared with other nations. At Sinai He said, "If you will obey My voice… you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests" (Ex. 19:6). This has never yet been realised. In Hosea 4:6 we hear the voice of Israel's indignant God: "I reject you from being a priest to me." But in the day of kingdom-glory, "you shall be called the priests of the LORD; they shall speak of you as the ministers of our God" (Isa. 61:6).
- The thought — God's original desire was a whole nation of priests, meaning a whole people able to draw near to Him.
- The condition — Sinai brings the first "if" in God's dealings with Israel. Blessing once given freely now rests on their obedience.
- The refusal — they answered, "All that the LORD has spoken we will do." They took absolute ground, with no hint of self-distrust.
- The cost — the priesthood shrank to Aaron's family. The nation as a whole lost the nearness offered here.
- The recovery — grace now gives believers what was here only offered on condition. Israel too will yet be called the priests of the LORD.