And all the assembly of the children of Israel journeyed from the wilderness of Sin, according to their journeys, at the command of Jehovah; and they encamped in Rephidim; and there was no water for the people to drink.
Exodus 17 opens with a march God Himself directed and ends at a camp with nothing to drink. Why would God's own guidance lead a redeemed people to a place with no water?
The verse says the people moved at the Lord's command. One writer asks whether redemption means smooth going from then on.
No fear of enemies on the way: to faith they are powerless. Full confidence belongs to redemption. Is it then, as men would say, all plain sailing now? Not at all. It is the wilderness, and there is no water; and note this — it was by the Lord's command they pitched in Rephidim.
Another writer separates the need itself from what Israel did with it.
Moving on from the wilderness of Sin, they camped in due course at Rephidim, with two stations in between, Dophkah and Alush (Num. 33:12-14). At Rephidim they wanted water, so they murmured again. Now there was nothing wrong in being hungry in the wilderness of Sin, or being thirsty at Rephidim. These are natural conditions of the creature no longer in Paradise. But their failure was in murmuring, and in seeing Moses as the cause of their condition — that is, of being without water. God, who had led them through the Red Sea, was leading them still, for they moved on "according to the commandment of the LORD" (17:1). If God was leading, then their arrival at Rephidim must be right.
Why bring a nation to a place with no supply at all? Because the absence is what makes room for the gift.
The wilderness was not part of His purpose, but it forms an essential part of His ways. It shows us that we have no resource of our own. It makes known the unfailing resources of divine power, grace and wisdom for every emergency of the wilderness path (see Deut. 8:2-6). Had they been able to get bread in the wilderness, there would have been no need to send bread from heaven. Had they found water, it would not have been necessary to bring water out of the rock. Everything was met by the fullness of divine resource. But God's provision is not measured by the needs of the wilderness. The need only gives Him the occasion. God displays His power in meeting the need, and also His grace in the overflowing abundance of His giving. … To be in the wilderness is not a condition of failure, but a consequence of redemption.
The manna had only just begun to fall.
If we did not know something of the humiliating evil of our own hearts, we could not explain Israel's astonishing insensitivity to all the Lord's goodness, faithfulness and mighty acts. They had just seen bread coming down from heaven to feed six hundred thousand people in the wilderness. Now they are "ready to stone" Moses for bringing them out into the wilderness to kill them with thirst. Nothing can exceed the desperate unbelief and wickedness of the human heart, except the superabounding grace of God.
The same writer sets three anxious questions against one answer.
Here are the questions of the wilderness: "What?" "Where?" "How?" Faith has a brief but comprehensive answer to all three, namely, GOD! … We certainly need to remember, when we are in trial, that "no temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it" (1 Cor. 10:13). Whenever we get into trial, we may be confident that with the trial there is a way out. All we need is a broken will and a single eye to see it.
The thirst is answered later in the chapter, and one writer reads that scene as a picture of Christ.
In Exodus 17 we do not have Christ given from above, the bread of God for us while we are in the world. We have the rock struck with Moses' rod, and the waters flow out abundantly. It was the last place where anyone would have looked for refreshing streams. But the rod of God strikes the rock, and the people drink of the waters it gave out. … The free gift of the Spirit of God to us in our thirst and weariness rests simply on Christ suffering for us. He came under judgment, the rod of God applied to that rock.
- Commanded. The route was God's, not a wrong turn — so the dry camp at Rephidim was exactly where His leading placed them.
- Emptied. Having no water was not a failure of the guidance; it was the emptiness that made room for a supply only God could give.
- Exposed. Thirst was no sin; murmuring was. The need did not create the unbelief, it revealed it — just after bread fell from heaven.
- Answered. To the wilderness questions "What? Where? How?" faith replies with one word: God — and every trial He permits carries its own way out.
- Supplied. The water came from a struck rock — the last place anyone would look. That is the pattern: Christ suffering, and the Spirit given freely to the thirsty.
And the people contended with Moses, and said, Give us water, that we may drink! And Moses said to them, Why do ye dispute with me? Why do ye tempt Jehovah?
God had just fed Israel with manna, and now they camped at Rephidim, where there was no water. Their thirst turned into a quarrel with Moses, and he named the real problem: they were testing the Lord.
The people turned on Moses because God was not in their thoughts. One writer shows what testing the Lord meant:
There was "no water for the people to drink. Therefore the people quarreled with Moses and said, Give us water to drink." This is unbelief. It always forgets grace and always turns to second causes. God was not in the thoughts of Israel, who only quarrelled with Moses. This was tempting Jehovah. They doubted that He was among them, and doubted that He was there to care for them. And they doubted after He had given the most magnificent and varied proofs of His power on their behalf, right up to the last moment. Why not ask water from Him who had given them meat in the evening, and filled them with bread in the morning?
Moses stood before Israel on God's behalf. That is why the quarrel could not stop with him:
The people quarrelled with Moses. But in reality, as Moses said, they tempted the Lord (v. 2). By their actions they were saying, "Is the LORD among us or not?" (v. 7.) Moses was their appointed leader, and so he was Jehovah's representative for the people. To quarrel with him was to quarrel with the Lord. To complain of their hardships was in fact to doubt the Lord's presence, if not to deny it. If they had believed that He was among them, every murmur would have stopped.
The timing is what startles. Bread from heaven had only just fallen:
If we did not know something of the humiliating evil of our own hearts, we could not explain Israel here at all. Nothing moved them — not the Lord's goodness, not His faithfulness, not His mighty acts. They had just seen bread coming down from heaven to feed six hundred thousand people in the wilderness. Now they are "ready to stone" Moses for bringing them out into the wilderness to kill them with thirst. Only one thing goes beyond the desperate unbelief and wickedness of the human heart: the overflowing grace of God.
The chapter before asked about food; this one asks about drink. The same writer sets both beside faith's answer:
It is interesting to note the two great questions raised by unbelief, in this chapter and the one before. They are exactly like the ones that come up, within us and around us, every day: "What shall we eat? and what shall we drink?"... But here are the questions of the wilderness: "What!" "Where!" "How?" Faith has a brief but complete answer to all three: GOD!
Two names came out of this scene. Their meanings say what happened here:
Massah means temptation, and Meribah means contention. The Spirit uses these names on purpose. They describe the moral state of the people and prove beyond dispute their hardened hearts of unbelief toward God. In quarrelling or contending with Moses, God's representative, they were in fact contending with God. They put Him to the proof by doubting His presence among them, and in effect denying it.
Dennett names the cure for the same failure in us:
This shows how solemn the sin of murmuring and complaining about wilderness trials is. At the same time it teaches us that the essence of all such complaint is doubting whether the Lord is with us. So the antidote... is a firm, unwavering hold on the truth that the Lord is among us, and that He leads His people like a flock through every stage of their wilderness journey.
God answered the quarrel with water. The way it came carries its own meaning:
Israel, as we are, was in a "dry and thirsty land," and they needed water; they needed life. There is no life for the sinner unless the judgment of God — the wages of sin — falls on someone... God told Moses to take his rod, the rod he had received in the place of judgment, and to strike the rock with it. It spoke of the judgment of God falling. It fell not on the sinful, murmuring people, but on Christ, who on the cross was made sin for us. The Rock bore the blows due to them, and from the split Rock the waters flowed — the living waters.
- Thirst. The need at Rephidim was real. But Israel demanded instead of asking, because unbelief turns to second causes and not to God.
- Quarrel. They argued with Moses. He stood there as God's representative, so the complaint went straight past him to the Lord.
- Test. Testing God meant doubting He was there at all — asking "Is the LORD among us or not?" after proof upon proof of His power, right up to the manna.
- Names. Massah means temptation and Meribah means contention. The Spirit keeps both names as a record of what unbelief sounds like.
- Water. God answered with water from a struck rock. Judgment fell on Christ so that living water could flow.
And the people thirsted there for water; and the people murmured against Moses, and said, Why is it that thou hast brought us up out of Egypt, to kill us and our children and our cattle with thirst?
The camp had moved at God's command. At Rephidim there was no water, and thirst turned into open accusation against the man who led them out. Why does a real need make the heart blame the leader instead of trusting the God who is leading?
The need itself was no failure of faith. One writer separates the need itself from the sin. He also points out who chose the campsite:
There was nothing wrong in being hungry in the wilderness of Sin, or being thirsty at Rephidim. These are natural conditions for people who no longer live in Paradise. But their failure was in murmuring, and in viewing Moses as the cause of their condition — that is, without water. God, who had led them through the Red Sea, was leading them still... If God was leading, then their arrival at Rephidim must be right.
They spoke to Moses, but their words went further. Moses had already named the real target of their grumbling. Behind their accusation lay a question about God's presence:
The people quarrelled with Moses. But in reality, as Moses said, they tempted the Lord (v. 2). By their actions they were saying, "Is the Lord among us, or not?" Moses was their appointed leader, so for the people he stood as the Lord's representative. To quarrel with him was therefore to quarrel with the Lord. To complain about their hardships was really to doubt the Lord's presence, if not to deny it. If they had believed He was among them, they would not have murmured at all... The essence of all such complaints is doubting whether the Lord is with us. So the antidote is a firm, unwavering hold on the truth that the Lord is among us, and that He leads His people like a flock through every stage of the wilderness journey.
after
Bread from heaven had just fed the whole camp. Yet these same people accused Moses of leading them out to die. Their reaction exposes the human heart:
They had just seen bread descending from heaven to feed six hundred thousand people in the wilderness, and now they are "ready to stone" Moses for bringing them out into the wilderness to kill them with thirst. Nothing can exceed the desperate unbelief and wickedness of the human heart, except the superabounding grace of God.
Another writer traces the same blank spot: the gift already in their hands taught them nothing about the Giver.
The fact that God fed them with bread from heaven did not satisfy their longings, and it did not suggest to them that He who gave them bread could also find them water. They had no faith.
The chapter contains two reactions to the same shortage. The people demanded from a man; Moses asked God:
Again the people proved themselves a generation with no faith. So they had no ability to profit by their past experience of God's power. They demand water from Moses with bitter reproaches. They are so bitter that they are almost ready to stone him. Moses, however, was a man of faith. He knew where his resource lay, and referred the matter to the Lord.
What followed their accusation was not punishment. One writer weighs their need against their guilt:
They were perishing with thirst, and had no water to drink. But more than this. They were sinners — they murmured; they tempted God, and were ready to stone His servant. So they were unworthy as well as needy. God would have been just to let them perish, for they deserved His wrath and displeasure. But He took the occasion to deal in grace instead of judgment... By striking another in their place, His justice would be satisfied and His mercy could flow freely. This is the way of grace to sinful, helpless people in the cross of Christ, and it was pictured in the struck rock.
Their unbelief becomes the setting for a picture of Christ. One writer answers them from their own history at the Red Sea:
They forgot the power of Him who made water stand like a wall on each side while they passed between. If He made the water into rock, cannot He make the rock into water?... God commands Moses to strike the rock, and water flows freely. That rock is a picture of a greater Rock struck for them, and for us, from whom living waters flow for thirsty souls... In the gospel there is more. On the last day, the great day of the feast, the Lord Jesus stands forth as the Rock about to be struck. He cried out, "If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink."
- Thirst — being without water was not sin. God Himself had led them to Rephidim, so the campsite was right even when it looked wrong.
- Murmur — the sin was blaming the leader for the circumstance instead of asking the God who had led them there.
- Target — Moses stood as God's representative, so quarrelling with him was quarrelling with the Lord. The real question was whether God was among them at all.
- Forgetfulness — yesterday's bread from heaven taught them nothing about today's water. Unbelief cannot learn from past experience of God's power.
- Grace — needy and guilty, they received no judgment but a struck rock. It points to Christ, who invites everyone who thirsts to come and drink.
And Moses cried to Jehovah, saying, What shall I do with this people? Yet a little, and they will stone me!
At Rephidim the people had no water, and they turned in anger on the man who had led them out of Egypt. His cry to God raises two questions: what lay behind their rage, and what does God do with a leader who has run out of answers?
The people aimed their words at Moses. One writer traces the line from the leader back to the One who appointed him:
The people quarrelled with Moses. But in reality, as Moses said, they tested the Lord (v. 2). By their actions they were saying, "Is the Lord among us, or not?" Moses was their appointed leader, so for the people he stood as the Lord's representative. To quarrel with him was therefore to quarrel with the Lord. To complain about their hardships was in fact to doubt, if not to deny, the Lord's presence.
Moses does not argue back. He prays. One writer contrasts the people's unbelief with his faith:
Again the people proved themselves to be a generation with no faith. So they had no ability to profit from their past experience of God's power. They demanded water from Moses with bitter reproaches, so bitter that they were almost ready to stone him. Moses, however, as a man of faith, knew where his resource lay, and referred the matter to the Lord.
The question itself is an admission. Moses has no water, and no plan of his own:
Moses is completely powerless in the face of this unjust quarrel. He cries out to the Lord: "What shall I do with this people?" Now he will learn a new lesson. The very presence of God is enough for all the needs of His own. God says, "Behold, I will stand before you there on the rock."
Moses reports the stoning threat to God. That report could have brought judgment down on the camp. Instead, the reply is water:
Moses cried to the Lord that the people were ready to stone him. This made their sin of murmuring worse. Still there is no judgment on them for it. Instead the Lord at once brings water from the rock, as if there had been no murmuring against Him and no murderous feeling toward Moses. He called the place Meribah, because of the people's quarrelling. He wanted the name to keep the memory of their sin alive. But God did not tell him to give that name. Grace would hide the sin. If the people said, "Is the Lord among us?" then God proves His presence — not by judgment, but by supplying their need.
God's answer does more than supply the camp. It settles Moses' standing in front of the very men who had turned on him:
At Rephidim he again suffers from the congregation, who are ready to stone him. But the Lord is a very present help to him in time of trouble. The Lord gives him particular power to bring relief to the rebellious people. The attack on him was personal, so his honour must be personal too — and it must come from those who had reproached and threatened him. The elders of Israel are called to see the water gush from the rock as Moses strikes it.
God's answer to the cry is a rock that must be struck before anything can flow. One writer names what that rock stands for:
So all is met by the most perfect grace. Every murmur brings out a fresh display. Here we have the refreshing stream gushing from the rock that was struck — a beautiful picture of the Spirit given as the fruit of Christ's completed sacrifice. "They drank from the spiritual Rock that followed them, and the Rock was Christ." But who could drink until the Rock was struck? Israel might have gazed on that rock and died of thirst while gazing. Until the rod of God struck it, it could give no refreshment.
- Cause. The quarrel looked like it was with Moses. It was really the question "Is the Lord among us, or not?" — doubt about God dressed up as a complaint about water.
- Cry. Moses answered a mob with a prayer. As a man of faith, he knew where his resource lay and handed the matter over to the Lord.
- Confession. "What shall I do with this people?" is the servant admitting he is powerless. That is where he learns that God's presence is enough for every need of His own.
- Grace. The stoning threat deepened Israel's guilt, yet God sent no judgment. He brought water as if nothing had been said, and never asked for the place to be named after their sin.
- Christ. The rock had to be struck before a drop came out. Israel could have looked at it and died of thirst; the water flowed only after the blow fell.
And Jehovah said to Moses, Go on before the people, and take with thee of the elders of Israel, and thy staff with which thou didst smite the river, take in thy hand, and go.
Israel is camped at Rephidim with no water. The people have turned on Moses, and he fears they will stone him. God answers with this command — walk out ahead of the crowd, take some elders, and bring the rod that once struck the Nile.
The people had just complained openly against Moses. Yet God's answer carries no penalty.
The Israelites murmured again because they had no water. New murmurings only bring out fresh grace (for they had not yet come to Sinai): God gave them water. His grace abounded where their sin abounded. The more they murmured, the more in one sense they got.
The people had asked whether God was among them. His answer settles it, but not in the way they expected.
Still there is no judgment upon them for this. The Lord at once brings water from the rock, as if there had been no murmuring against Him, and no murderous feeling toward Moses… If the people said, "Is the Lord among us?" God proves His presence, not by judgment, but by supplying their need.
God does not just say "your rod." He names it by what it did in Egypt. That naming carries the meaning.
Here we have a type of Christ smitten for us, by the hand of God, in judgment. Note the expression, "the staff with which you struck the Nile." Why the Nile? Why point to this one stroke of the rod? Exodus 7:20 gives the reply… It was the rod which turned the water into blood that was to strike "that Rock which was Christ" so that streams of life and refreshment might flow for us.
The same instrument now works in the opposite direction.
So the river of Egypt and the rock in the wilderness were brought into close moral association by the rod of divine judgment. Sin calls for judgment. Israel's rebellion cried for it. But the blow was to fall, not on Israel, but on the rock. The rod was not to destroy them; it was to be the means of their life… In Egypt that rod had turned life into death. In the wilderness it was about to turn death into life.
Writers read the struck rock through Paul's comment on Israel's desert history.
Even as the manna, the rock also speaks of Christ. Paul says, "They drank from the spiritual Rock that followed them, and the Rock was Christ." But the Rock was struck before the waters flowed… We see then, in this striking of the rock, the stroke of His judgment falling upon Christ on the cross. The struck rock is a crucified Christ. It was the people's sin, note, that led to the striking of the rock.
God tells Moses where He Himself will stand — on the rock that is about to be struck.
Here Horeb, "the dry place," yields water. The Lord Himself is there. He stands upon the rock which is to display at once His power, His sufficiency and His grace. The rod which had struck the river now strikes the rock. It is the rod of power on behalf of His people. The streams gush out in abundant supply for all Israel's thirsty crowd. The striking of our living Rock has created for us a spring of refreshment and satisfaction. It is as inexhaustible as the eternal source it comes from. That source is God Himself — the God whose name is love.
The elders are not decoration. They are the leaders of the very people who had just threatened Moses' life.
At Rephidim he again suffers from the congregation, who are ready to stone him. But the Lord is a very present help to him in time of trouble. He gives him special power to bring relief to the rebellious people. The people attacked him personally, so he must be honoured personally — and by those, too, who had reproached and threatened him. The Lord calls the elders of Israel to see the water gush from the rock as Moses strikes it. So the Lord approves His servant before the heads of the people.
Years later, at a similar crisis, the instruction changes — and that change is the point.
In Numbers God does not tell Moses to strike the rock. He tells him to speak to it, for Christ, having once suffered, must not suffer again. God also tells him to take the rod of Aaron's priestly office. He does take it, but he strikes the rock — and he strikes it with his own rod of judgment. That was a serious double mistake.
- Thirst — the people's complaint deserved judgment. Instead their sin became the occasion for water. God proved He was among them by meeting their need, not by punishing.
- Rod — God names the rod by its history. It had turned Egypt's river to blood. The rod that once turned life into death now turns death into life.
- Rock — Paul identifies the rock as Christ. The stroke that opened it pictures God's judgment falling on Him at the cross.
- Witnesses — the elders come as leaders of the complaining people. They watch God honour the servant they threatened.
- Once — Moses strikes the rock a single time. At the later crisis God tells him to speak to it, because Christ suffered once and is not to suffer again.
Behold, I will stand before thee there upon the rock on Horeb; and thou shalt strike the rock, and there shall come water out of it, that the people may drink. And Moses did so before the eyes of the elders of Israel.
Israel camped at Rephidim, found no water, and turned on Moses. God's answer raises three questions: why a rock, why that rod, and why God says He will stand there.
The people were not just thirsty. They had complained and threatened Moses. Look at what God did not do.
They were sinners — they murmured; they tempted God, and were ready to stone His servant. So they were unworthy as well as needy. God could rightly have let them perish, for they deserved His wrath and displeasure. But He used the moment to deal in grace instead of judgment. His pitying eye saw their need, and His loving heart felt for them. His infinite wisdom and mercy planned a way of rescue, and His almighty arm carried it out at once.
The location matters. Horeb was the last place on earth a thirsty man would go looking for a drink.
Here Horeb, "the dry place," yields water. The Lord Himself is there. He stands on the rock, and the rock is to display at once His power, His sufficiency and His grace... The striking of our living Rock has made for us a spring of refreshment and satisfaction. It is as endless as the eternal source it comes from. And that source is in God Himself — the God whose name is love.
God does not send Moses to strike something at a distance from Himself. He puts Himself at the point where the blow lands.
The Rock is a type of Christ. Jehovah stood upon the rock to be struck, just as "God was in Christ" (2 Cor. 5:19). The striking by the rod, used in judgment on the river of Egypt, is the type of the death of Christ. There could be no water till the rock was struck. There could be no water till Christ had died.
(The phrase "God was in Christ" follows an older translation of 2 Corinthians 5:19.)
God tells Moses to bring one particular rod — the one he had used on the Nile. The elders of Israel stand and watch what that rod does.
So the rod of divine judgment brought the river of Egypt and the rock in the wilderness into close moral connection. Sin calls for judgment. Israel's rebellion cried out for it. But the blow was to fall on the rock, not on Israel. The rod was not to destroy them; it was to be the means of their life... Moses and the elders of Israel gathered round the rock, and the people crowded together to watch the ways of God. The rod which in Egypt had turned life into death was in the wilderness about to turn death into life.
The verse sets the order: first the blow, then the water. One writer reads that sequence as a picture of God's own restraint.
The Rock was struck, and "water gushed out." Not before — that was impossible; for because of sin God was, as it were, held back. His mercies and compassions, His grace and His love, were pent up within Himself. But then atonement was accomplished, and it satisfied the claims of His holiness forever. At once the floodgates of His heart opened to pour out streams of grace and life throughout the world.
So what does the water stand for? One writer ties it to the gift that comes after Christ's work.
But there is more here. "You shall strike the rock, and water shall come out of it, and the people will drink." It is the type of the Holy Spirit given. This gift, which follows Christ's work, goes far beyond new birth. Now that redemption is complete, the Spirit within the believer is a fountain springing up into everlasting life. He is even a river flowing out in testimony to Jesus glorified.
Water flows from a rock twice in Israel's history. The difference between the two times is the point.
Twice the waters flow from the struck rock, bringing life and refreshment to Israel's host. The first time, the lesson is plain: the cross, through which alone we receive all spiritual blessing. The second time, God told Moses to take the rod of Aaron that budded and speak to the rock. There we get a beautiful picture of the resources Christ has as priest in resurrection. As He uses them, the living waters flow — flow, we may say, from the throne where He sits. No second striking was needed. In this Moses erred. The one Sacrifice is enough.
- Need — Israel was thirsty and guilty at once. God met the complaint with grace, not the judgment they deserved.
- Blow — the rod that had judged Egypt fell on the rock, not on the people. What had brought death now brought life.
- Presence — God said He would stand on the rock; the stroke landed where He Himself was.
- Flow — nothing came before the blow, and everything came after it. The Spirit is a spring within and a river flowing out.
- Once — one striking was enough. Trying to repeat it later was Moses' error, not God's plan.
And he called the name of the place Massah, and Meribah, because of the contention of the children of Israel, and because they had tempted Jehovah, saying, Is Jehovah among us, or not?
At Rephidim God gave Israel water out of a rock, yet Moses named the place after the people's sin, not God's gift. Two Hebrew names keep one question on record — a question asked by people who then drank the water that answered it.
The names are not decoration. Each one records what the people did at that place.
Massah means temptation, Meribah means contention, and these names, expressly used by the Spirit, describe the moral state of the people, and proved beyond dispute their hardened hearts of unbelief toward God. For in quarrelling with Moses, who was God's representative, they were really quarrelling with God and putting Him to the proof by doubting, or in effect denying, His presence among them.
The phrase is often misunderstood. It does not mean trusting God too far; it means the opposite — refusing to trust Him until He proves Himself.
To put God to the proof, to see whether He would be faithful, is not to trust Him as truly faithful. That is what the expression "tempting God" means. It does not mean going too far in trusting Him.
The specific form it took at Rephidim was doubt about whether God was still with them at all.
It was tempting Jehovah — that is, doubting His presence among them, and doubting that He was there to care for them. And this after He had given the most magnificent and varied proofs of His power on their behalf, right up to that last moment. Why not ask water from Him who had given them meat in the evening and filled them with bread in the morning?
The verse joins two things: their quarrel with Moses and their testing of the Lord. Both were the same act.
The people quarrelled with Moses. But in reality, as Moses said, they tempted the Lord, saying by their actions, "Is the LORD among us or not?" Moses was their appointed leader, and so he was Jehovah's representative for the people. To quarrel with him was to quarrel with the Lord; and to complain of their hardships was in fact to doubt, if not to deny, the Lord's presence... It shows how solemn a sin it is to murmur and complain because of the trials of the wilderness. It also teaches us that the essence of all such complaint is doubting whether the Lord is with us. So the antidote to all such tendencies is a firm, unwavering hold on the truth that the Lord is among us, and that He leads His people like a flock through every stage of their wilderness journey.
There is a mirror image of this sin. Asking "Is the Lord among us?" in real need is unbelief. Claiming His presence while going on in sin is another thing entirely.
When we are going on wickedly and wilfully, and say, "Is not the Lord among us? no evil can come upon us" that is quite another thing. The Lord will indeed be with us even then — if we are His children — but to chasten us. Whenever there is real need in the wilderness, it is sin to doubt whether God will help us or not.
Moses had already struck the rock, and the water had already flowed.
The name of the place where this meaningful picture was given is a standing memorial of man's unbelief... After so many assurances and proofs of Jehovah's presence, to ask such a question proves the deep-seated unbelief of the human heart. It was, in fact, tempting Him... Faith never acts like this; it believes in and enjoys the divine presence, not by a sign, but by knowing Him. It knows He is there to be enjoyed, and it enjoys Him.
Right after this verse, Amalek attacks. The order of events is not random.
The moral link, as given here, seems to be not between the gift of the water and Amalek's attack, but between the unbelief of the people and this attack.
Weigh what looks like a small complaint against everything God had already done.
Tempting Jehovah in the desert was saying, Is Jehovah among us or not? This may seem to unbelievers a small offence; in the eyes of God and of faith it is a terrible one. Had He not broken the pride and power of Egypt for His poor unworthy people? Had He not brought them triumphantly out of the house of slavery, their Guide and their Rearguard, to live among them and be their God?
- The question. "Is the Lord among us or not?" is the root of all murmuring. Every complaint in the wilderness is a doubt about His presence.
- The naming. Massah means temptation, Meribah means contention. The name records the people's unbelief, not the water God gave.
- The definition. Tempting God is not over-trusting Him; it is demanding proof before trusting Him at all.
- The target. Quarrelling with God's appointed representative was quarrelling with God Himself.
- The consequence. Faith needs no sign, because it knows Him. Where that trust failed, Amalek's attack followed.