Exodus 16:4–30

Exodus 16:4 · Darby

Then said Jehovah to Moses, Behold, I will rain bread from heaven for you; and the people shall go out and gather the daily need on its day, that I may prove them, whether they will walk in my law, or not.

God answers a hungry, complaining people with bread out of the sky, not with punishment. In the same breath He calls that bread a test. Free giving and daily gathering stand side by side in this verse.

Grace, not judgment

Israel had been murmuring, hungry and looking back to Egypt. God's answer is provision. One writer sets this beside a later scene, where a similar cry met a very different response:

The first thing to notice is the grace with which God meets the desires of the people. In Numbers 11 He also meets their desire in similar circumstances. But there "the anger of the LORD was kindled against the people, and the LORD struck down the people with a very great plague." Here there is no sign of judgment — only patient and forbearing grace. The difference springs from the dispensation. In Numbers they were under law, and God dealt with them on that ground. Here they are under grace, and so grace reigned despite their sin.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

God also let the hunger come first, and answered only when they felt it:

When they were hungry enough to cry out for bread, God gave them bread. How true for us also! If He had first given them bread before they were hungry, they might well have complained that they wanted something different. The flesh in us always thinks it knows what we need better than God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The gift itself is the test

The words "that I may test them" hang on the gift itself, not on some separate ordeal:

Even God's grace in this way proves us. In fact, nothing proves us more than grace. The very name "manna" carries as much meaning in the picture as it did in the history. It reminds us how little even the people of God enter into what we have here. "They said to one another, 'manna' (what is it?), for they did not know what it was."

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The test found something out about Israel:

Only a heart weaned from Egypt's influences could be satisfied with "bread from heaven," or enjoy it. In fact, we know that the people were not satisfied with it. They despised it, called it "light food," and craved meat. So they showed how little their hearts were free of Egypt, or willing to walk in God's law… It takes a heavenly taste to feed on bread from heaven. Nature cannot enjoy such food.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A test before the law

God had not yet given the law. That shapes how "walk in my law" reads here:

The people were not yet formally under the law, so the Lord at once stepped in with mercy. Yet by the bread from heaven there would be a first testing: would they walk in His law when He gave it, or would they not? This we see in verse 4.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A day's portion, every day

The instruction is not simply "gather", but "gather a day's portion every day". God ruled out storing on purpose:

The manna was a daily provision for daily need. No one could hoard it; if anyone tried, it bred worms and stank. In the same way we cannot live on yesterday's enjoyment of Christ. We must enjoy Him today… Constant dependence upon God, constant drawing from Him, is what He appoints as the way of blessing for us. He would keep us with Himself. We must recognise the hand of God that supplies us, and gives us no store that would let us live, even a little, independently of Him.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The daily habit has an hour and a priority:

We must gather the heavenly manna fresh every morning. We must make Christ our primary object. We must seek Him "early," before "other things" have had time to take possession of our poor, easily-captured hearts.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What the bread pictures

Writers read the manna as a picture of Christ — food for people still travelling:

Manna was food for the wilderness, and presents to us Christ, a humbled Christ in this world. This uniquely attractive picture brings before us the matchless, heavenly grace that marked Him in His lowly path of pleasure for His God and Father. It shows His obedience, meekness, gentleness, dependence, His love of righteousness, His hatred of lawlessness, and every other feature of perfection.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Jesus pointed past Moses to the Giver:

The Lord Jesus said to the Jews, "Truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven" (John 6:32). What a beautiful answer to murmuring is God's tender action. Here were these people all murmuring, and the Lord steps in and "rains bread from heaven" for them.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace first. Complaint deserved judgment; God answered with bread, because Israel stood under grace and not yet under law.

- Grace proves. The gift was the test — nothing exposes a heart more than kindness, and the manna revealed hearts still tied to Egypt.

- Grace is daily. A day's portion for a day, gathered fresh and early. Hoarded manna bred worms, and yesterday's enjoyment of Christ will not feed today.

- Grace humbles. God let them hunger before He fed them, so they would take what He chose rather than what the flesh demanded.

- Grace has a Person. The bread from heaven pictures Christ in His lowliness. He claimed the reality for Himself: the Father gives the true bread from heaven.

Exodus 16:5 · Darby

And it shall come to pass on the sixth day, that they shall prepare what they have brought in; and it shall be twice as much as they shall gather daily.

A hungry nation grumbles, and God answers by promising bread out of heaven. One detail sounds strange: on the sixth day they gather twice as much, for a rest they have never been told to keep.

A rest given in grace, before any law

The double portion is the first hint of the Sabbath in Israel's history. It comes before God has given the law. One writer marks how long the silence lasted before this moment:

Notice this carefully: God gave the Sabbath of Jehovah's rest before the law, along with the eating of this bread from heaven. It was first given to Israel as a privilege, not by command, or on the principle of law. And here the people rested on the seventh day. I know of no other single instance where the people rested on the Sabbath day. From Adam to Moses, right up to this chapter, more than 2,500 years passed. In all that time the Spirit never uses the word Sabbath, in its root or in any of its forms. And here, in the wilderness of Sin, it is God's gift to His redeemed people, in perfect grace.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

The food serves the rest

The extra gathering serves the seventh day. That order shows which of the two God treats as greater:

So we find that God made the "manna" — the heavenly food He supplied to meet His people's daily need — serve the "rest" which He appointed for them. That rest outweighed every other consideration. The Lord says, "The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Where the rest is found

So where is that rest found? One writer answers from the meaning of the word itself:

"Sabbath" means rest. Here, if the connection means anything as a type — and it surely must — then the teaching is clear. Our hearts find rest as we take in and enjoy Christ as the Bread from heaven.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The one exception to daily gathering

Every other day, extra manna rotted. The sixth day was the one time storing it was right, and the exception proves the rule:

Everyone had to gather it every day according to his eating (Ex. 16:16); and if he gathered more — unless it was for "the Sabbath" — it would certainly become corrupt. No, dear friends, there must be constant feeding upon Christ, day by day and hour by hour; and we can never receive more than we need at the time. This keeps us in continual dependence, with our eyes always on Christ.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Gathered with the rest in view, it keeps

Why the manna was gathered decided whether it rotted or kept. One writer takes that further, into eternity:

Collected this way on any other day, out of self-will, it became worthless and rotten. But done in obedience, with the Sabbath in view, it stayed sound and good. The truth taught is that when we share in God's rest, in His grace, throughout eternity, Christ will still be our food. There is perhaps another thought. It is that whatever we gain of Christ here becomes our eternal possession and delight. Gather as much manna as we may, two omers instead of one; if it is kept for the rest that remains, it will be a source of strength and joy throughout eternity.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The sixth day as a picture

Commentators also read the sixth day as a picture of the journey's last stretch. One takes the doubled gathering as work that grows heavier before it ends:

On the sixth day they were to gather twice as much as on other days, to provide for the Sabbath, when they were not to gather at all (v. 5). As a type this teaches two things. There will be no labour of gathering in eternity, but that labour increases as eternity draws near.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Another sees that same day as both hard and fruitful:

On the sixth day the amount is twice as much as usual. The sixth day is the day of discipline, and it is also the day of spiritual harvest.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Given, not demanded. The Sabbath first appears here as a gift to a redeemed people. It came before the law, as a privilege, not a command.

- Gathered daily. The ordinary rule is no hoarding: enough for today only, which keeps the eye fixed on Christ.

- Doubled once. The sixth day is the lone exception. God gives the extra portion for one reason: the rest that follows.

- Kept without decay. Manna held back in self-will rots. Manna held for the Sabbath stays good. What we take in of Christ with that rest in view is never lost.

- Resting in Christ. The bread from heaven and the day of rest belong together: the rest is found in feeding on Him.

Exodus 16:6 · Darby

And Moses and Aaron said to all the children of Israel, In the evening, then shall ye know that Jehovah has brought you out from the land of Egypt;

Israel had blamed Moses and Aaron for marching them into a desert to starve. The two men answer by pointing away from themselves. By evening, they say, Israel will know whose hand really brought them out of Egypt — and the food God sends will be the proof.

Whose Hand Brought Them Out

The complaint in verse 3 had a target: Moses and Aaron. Verse 6 corrects that charge. One writer shows how fast the people had changed their story about their own rescue.

They say they wish they had died in the land of Egypt, while they sat by the meat pots and had plenty to eat. But they forgot the harsh slavery they had suffered under, complaining bitterly all the while! They accuse Moses and Aaron of bringing them out of Egypt. Yet only a short time before, they had sung in triumph to the Lord, thanking Him for His great deliverance. How is it possible that their eyes had grown so dim, and in so short a time?

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer traces the same forgetfulness to walking by sight:

By now they had surely eaten all the food they brought out of Egypt, and in the wilderness there was no visible source of supply. Sad to say, the people were walking by sight. The wonders of the Passover night and the crossing of the Red Sea had happened within the month. Yet they had completely forgotten the power of their God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

"What Are We?"

Moses takes no credit for the miracles and no blame for the hunger. One writer notes that wonders worked through God's servants point away from those servants.

These miracles gave no honour to the men who worked them, though of course they proved that their ministry came from God. They were wholly a testimony to the Living Word, the Lord Jesus Christ, and all He taught. This is true even of Moses' works of power. In Exodus 16:8 and elsewhere we read, "What are we? Your grumbling is not against us but against the LORD."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Evening Proof, Morning Glory

Verse 6 promises knowledge by evening. Verse 7 promises glory in the morning. One writer draws out the difference between the two.

It was as great a miracle to bring the quails, but seeing the glory is not said in connection with them. God had promised, "in the morning you shall see the glory of the LORD." What took place at evening? God gave them flesh to eat. That was God's proof that He had brought them out of the land of Egypt. It showed that if He led them through the wilderness, He would feed them also. But more than this was to be seen in the morning.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Two Kinds of Need

The evening flesh and the morning bread meet different hungers, and both are gifts.

The bread that Israel gathered every morning was only a type of the true bread... But the flesh in the evening, what may we learn from that? Does it not tell us of the provision God makes to meet our bodily needs? After the toil of the day the body needs refreshment... Just as the evening quails meet every bodily need, so the morning bread teaches us to begin each day with Him who alone sustains the soul... The quails are as much His gift as the bread; both are of His grace.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Answered With Grace, Not Judgment

Numbers 11 records a similar scene with a very different ending. One writer explains why the same request met a different answer.

In Numbers 11 He also meets their desire in similar circumstances. But there "the wrath of the LORD was kindled against the people, and the LORD struck down the people with a very great plague." Here there is no sign of judgment — only patient and forbearing grace. The difference springs, if we may so describe it, from the way God was dealing with them at the time. In Numbers they were under law, and God treated them accordingly. Here they are under grace, and so grace reigned despite their sin. Their grumbling was also the occasion for the display of the glory of the Lord. So when man shows what he is, God reveals from the depths of His heart what He is.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The same grace shapes how God draws near to them:

He does not judge them. Instead, He lets His glory draw near, so that the light of His presence might shine in on this grumbling people.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Forgetting — Within a month of the Red Sea, Israel remembered Egypt's food and forgot Egypt's chains. They forgot the power that had rescued them.

- Misdirected — They aimed the complaint at Moses and Aaron. "What are we?" Moses answers. The grumbling was against the Lord.

- Proof — The flesh at evening was God's evidence that He had brought them out. The God who led them would also feed them.

- Glory — Morning went further. Their grumbling became the occasion for the Lord to display His glory.

- Grace — Under grace no judgment fell. The same failure under law in Numbers brought a plague. What man is drew out what God is.

Exodus 16:7 · Darby

and in the morning, then shall ye see the glory of Jehovah; for he has heard your murmurings against Jehovah; -- and what are we, that ye murmur against us?

Israel is in the wilderness, and the camp turns on Moses and Aaron. Moses answers with a promise for that evening and that morning. He also corrects them about who they are really complaining against.

The real target of the complaint

The people had a visible target for their anger. Moses points them past it, to God.

God had heard the murmurings of the children of Israel against Him. They may say they were complaining only against Moses and Aaron. But these men were nothing more than representatives of God. So Moses insists that their murmurings were not against Moses and Aaron, but against the Lord (v. 8).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

"What are we?"

Moses' question is not mere modesty. God's servants took no honour for the works of power they performed.

These miracles gave no honour at all to the people who performed them. Of course they confirmed the divine character of their ministry. They were entirely a testimony to the Living Word, the Lord Jesus Christ, and to all He taught. This is true even of Moses' works of power, as in Exodus 16:8 and elsewhere: "What are we? Your grumbling is not against us but against the LORD."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Evening proof, morning glory

The promise has two halves. The evening would settle who had brought them out. The morning would show them something they had not pictured.

Moses and Aaron speak to the children of Israel, to subdue them before the Lord. They tell them that at evening they will have a fresh reminder that the Lord — not Moses and Aaron — has brought them out of Egypt. Then the next morning they would see the glory of the Lord in a way they had not imagined.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Grace, not judgment

No judgment falls on the complainers here. One writer ties that to timing: this happened before God gave the law.

Look back at Exodus 16 and 17. Those chapters record their murmurings and complaints before God gave the law. We see a difference at once. Then no judgment followed, as it did later in Numbers 11. It illustrates the statement that "sin is not counted where there is no law" (Rom. 5:13), and also that other statement of the apostle, "when the commandment came, sin came alive and I died" (Rom. 7:9).

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Murmuring became the occasion of glory

The grumbling itself is the reason given for the coming display. One writer treats that as a principle in all of God's dealings.

Their murmurings were the occasion of the display of the glory of the Lord (v. 10). So the display of what man is draws out from the depths of the heart of God the revelation of what He is. It was so in the garden of Eden, and indeed all the way down the line of His dealings with man. We see this principle in perfection at the cross. There man appeared in all the utter corruption of his evil nature, and God showed Himself fully.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The same glory does not always land the same way on the same people.

God in His grace answered Israel's murmuring. He gave them flesh and manna, and He also appeared in His glory (Ex. 16:2-10). God did not rebuke them for murmuring, but appeared in His glory to show His care for them in wonderful grace. It was not until the people had undertaken to keep the law that the glory of God brought terror to the hearts of Israel.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

He hears every word

The verse gives God's hearing as the reason for what follows. One writer turns that into a test for our own words.

All our complaints, our expressions of unbelief, our murmurings, are against the Lord, and come straight into His ears. If the Lord were visibly before our eyes, we would not dare to say what we often allow ourselves to say in the hastiness of our unbelief. And yet we really are before Him, His eyes are upon us, and He hears our every word.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

How God still answers a complaining people

God's answer was food that kept coming for forty years. One writer reads the manna as a picture of Christ.

How does God answer the murmurers? And how does He answer us if we are walking in their path? Read the whole of Exodus 16 for the answer. For forty years — the whole time of their wanderings in the wilderness — He gave them manna. He puts Christ before us the whole time of our wilderness journey. Christ is the always humble, dependent, obedient One. He is the only One who accepted everything in the wilderness path as from God His Father, without a single murmur. The manna is Christ in humiliation, seen here as a dependent Man. That is how God meets your murmuring and mine.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Complaint. "What are we?" The grumbling went past Moses and Aaron, God's representatives, and landed on the Lord Himself.

- Heard. God hears every word of it. Our complaints reach His ears as we speak them.

- Grace. No judgment falls here. God had not yet given the law, and where there is no law, sin is not counted.

- Glory. What man showed became the occasion for what God showed — a principle seen in full at the cross.

- Bread. God met the grumbling with forty years of manna. One writer reads it as Christ, the one Man who crossed the wilderness without a single complaint.

Exodus 16:8 · Darby

And Moses said, When Jehovah gives you in the evening flesh to eat, and in the morning bread to the full; for Jehovah hears your murmurings which ye murmur against him ... and what [are] we? your murmurings are not against us, but against Jehovah.

Israel had barely left Egypt when hunger in the desert turned into complaint against Moses and Aaron. Moses sends the complaint on to its true address. The leaders were never the real target, and the God they were complaining against had already heard them.

The Complaint Had the Wrong Address

Moses does not defend himself and Aaron. He points past them to the One they served.

God had heard the murmurings of the children of Israel against Him. They may say they were complaining only against Moses and Aaron, but those two men were nothing more than God's representatives. So Moses insists that their murmurings were not against Moses and Aaron, but against the Lord (v.8).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

What is true of this one complaint is true of every sin:

Note also that murmuring against Moses and Aaron was murmuring against the Lord. (v. 8.) All sin is really against God. (See Psalm 51:4; Luke 15:18-21.)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

What Lies Under a Murmur

Take away the food shortage and the leaders, and one thing remains underneath the grumbling.

We generally find out where we are by a murmuring spirit. Nothing is easier than for a murmuring spirit to get into the heart of a believer, or a whole church... The murmuring was really against God, and not against the servants of God. Examine any murmuring honestly. It is not against the circumstances, nor against God's people. It is always the outcome of downright unbelief towards God. That is the point.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

That unbelief carries a specific charge against God's character:

Don't murmur, Christian, for it is a most unchristian, a most ungodly thing to do. Nothing dishonours God more, nothing does greater damage to the soul. Of all the sins Israel committed in the wilderness, this was the chief one. It meant they did not believe their God was fit to be trusted.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

He Heard — and Sent Dinner

The verse says the Lord has heard them. What He does next is the surprise of the chapter.

The people murmured. They showed how much they wanted to go back to Egypt, almost as soon as God had rescued them from it... But grace, without judgment, answers their murmuring, and provides for their need. The Lord heard them, but did not rebuke them. They cried for bread — it was rained from heaven; He gave them flesh every evening, and bread every morning.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

He Hears Our Words Too

One writer presses this home to the reader:

We do not remember often enough that all our complaints, our expressions of unbelief, our murmurings, are against the Lord, and come straight into His ears. How often our sinful words would die away on our lips if this thought were in our minds! If the Lord were visibly before our eyes, we would not dare to say what we often allow ourselves to say in the hastiness of our unbelief. And yet we really are before Him, His eyes are upon us, and He hears our every word.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why Grace Here and Judgment Later

Later on, the same sin met a very different answer. Commentators trace the difference to where Israel stood at the time. This scene falls before Sinai, before the law came.

In chapters 15, 16 and 17 the Lord bears their murmurings with long-suffering and tenderness, and He meets their needs out of the fulness of His unwearied love. But after Sinai, murmurings of the same kind bring judgment. The reason is simple: the people themselves had asked to be put under law.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Their Worst Moment Became His Showcase

God's answer was not only food. Notice what drew out the sight of His glory — not their obedience, but their complaining.

How very solemn it is that the first mention of the display of God's glory has to do with meeting their murmurings... Aaron, directed by Moses, said to the whole congregation, "Come near before the Lord: for He has heard your murmurings." Then the glory of the Lord appeared in the cloud (verse 10). Although Israel had murmured, God was dealing with them in grace. He answered their murmurings in grace, with the rich provision of flesh and manna.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

God did not drive them away. He called them nearer:

He does not judge them. On the contrary, He lets His glory draw near, so that the very light of His presence might shine in on this murmuring people.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard. The Lord hears complaints that people aim at someone else. Moses and Aaron were only His representatives, so the words went past them to God — and our words reach Him the same way.

- Traced. Follow any murmur to its root and you find unbelief — the verdict that God is not fit to be trusted. All sin is really against God.

- Answered. He heard without rebuking: flesh at evening, bread in the morning. Grace, not judgment, met the grumbling.

- Timed. This is before Sinai. Once the law came, the same murmuring brought judgment. The ground the people stood on made the difference.

- Displayed. God's glory appears in Scripture for the first time in answer to complaint. He told the murmurers to come near, not to keep away.

Exodus 16:9 · Darby

And Moses spoke to Aaron, Say to all the assembly of the children of Israel, Come near into the presence of Jehovah; for he has heard your murmurings.

The people had just complained that Moses and Aaron brought them into the desert to starve. God's reply comes through Aaron: gather the whole congregation and bring them near. And look at the reason He gives. They are called near not because He missed their complaint, but because He heard it.

Called Near, Not Judged

You would expect God to act against people He has heard grumbling. Here He does the opposite.

And that is the lesson we learn here, in the wilderness of Sin. It is met by the words, "Come near before the LORD, for He has heard your grumbling" (Ex. 16:9). Ah, He does not judge them. On the contrary, He lets His glory draw near, so that the very light of His presence might shine in on this complaining people. They had said, "Would that we had died" (Ex. 16:3)... They had forgotten their bondage. All they remembered was what they had fed upon. They were away from the meat pots of Egypt. But they had not yet learned that the fullness of God's hand is enough.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Real Target of the Complaint

The complaint sounded like it was against Moses and Aaron. One writer shows where it actually landed, and what God drew out of it.

Notice, further, that murmuring against Moses and Aaron was murmuring against the Lord (v. 8). All sin is really against God... Their complaints were also the occasion for the display of the glory of the Lord (v. 10). So the display of what man is brings out of the depths of the heart of God the revelation of what He is. It was so in the garden of Eden, and indeed all down the line of His dealings with man. The cross shows this principle perfectly. There man displayed the complete corruption of his evil nature, and God revealed Himself fully.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

No Honour for the Messengers

Moses and Aaron carried the message, but took no credit for it. One writer links this to every miracle God's servants performed.

These miracles were kept completely separate from any honour given to the people who performed them. Of course they proved the divine character of their ministry. But they were wholly a testimony to the Living Word, the Lord Jesus Christ, and all He taught. This is true even as to Moses' works of power; as Exodus 16:8, and elsewhere, "What are we? Your grumbling is not against us but against the LORD."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Servant Leads Where He Has Been

Moses had already learned this lesson himself. His call to the people to come near grows out of what he had been taught.

He asks the people to "come near" before the Lord who had heard their complaints. He had known that effect in himself. Like a wise master builder, he wanted to lead his brothers into the same thing, even if it was by a different path. The glory of the Lord and the resources of the Lord had already taught him. Now he wants the people to receive the same blessed teaching, even though their discontent and complaining is what draws it out... Let us note that a servant's discipline must always be in advance of the service required of him. He cannot lead beyond that point to which he himself has been led.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Turning to Face the Desert

Coming near involved a change of direction. Their hearts were still fixed on the country behind them.

While the glory-cloud of Jehovah's presence shaded and lit up the camp, the hearts of Israel were on Egypt. Their faces were turned that way, and it needed Aaron's words to change their attitude, but after a while "they looked toward the wilderness" (v. 10). In these words, "they looked toward the wilderness," lies the key we seek. God had displayed His glory in judgment, both in Egypt and in the Red Sea; He would now display His glory in the wilderness.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Before Sinai

This scene belongs to a stretch of the journey that ends at Sinai, where Israel promised to obey the law.

God was the Provider. The bitter water was made sweet; the manna came down each night; the water flowed out of the hard rock — and all for a complaining people. What grace, what patient dealing by God! And until they reached Sinai and promised to obey the law, God dealt with them in pure grace. He supplied each need, and He did not punish them for their complaining.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard. God does not ignore the complaint. He answers it — and the answer starts with a call to come closer, not an order to stand back.

- Aimed. The grumbling hit Moses and Aaron, but it was really aimed at God; all sin is really against Him.

- Displayed. What man showed of himself became the occasion for God to show what He is. At the cross this reaches perfection.

- Turned. Israel had to stop facing Egypt and look toward the desert before the glory came into view.

- Provided. The One they complained against fed them. Until Sinai, He met every need and never punished their complaining.

Exodus 16:10 · Darby

And it came to pass, when Aaron spoke to the whole assembly of the children of Israel, that they turned toward the wilderness, and behold, the glory of Jehovah appeared in the cloud.

Israel left Egypt only two months earlier, and now the whole camp is complaining about hunger in the desert. Instead of rebuke, God gives them a sight: they turn toward the empty wilderness and see His glory shine out of the cloud.

The complaint that reached higher than Moses

Moses had already told the people that their words were aimed past him. One writer sees a rule that runs through the whole Bible. The people's grumbling became the moment God showed what He is.

Their grumbling was the occasion of the display of the glory of the Lord (v. 10). So the display of what man is draws out of the depths of God's heart the revelation of what He is. It was so in the garden of Eden, and indeed all down the line of His dealings with man. The cross shows this principle in perfection. There man appeared in all the utter corruption of his evil nature, and God revealed Himself fully... Notice too that grumbling against Moses and Aaron was grumbling against the Lord (v. 8). All sin is really against God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Glory instead of judgment

The glory appears, yet nothing is struck down. One writer points to the words that met their complaint, and to what God did with a people who had just wished themselves dead.

It is met by the words, "Come near before the LORD, for He has heard your grumbling" (Ex. 16:9). Ah, He does not judge them. On the contrary, He lets His glory draw near, so that the very light of His presence might shine in on this grumbling people. They had said, "Would that we had died" (Ex. 16:3)... Which was better: to toil at the brick-kilns of Pharaoh, or to travel in the desert with God?

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Looking the right way

The verse records a turn of the head before it records the vision. Their hearts were still on Egypt. One writer calls that change of direction the key to the whole scene.

While the glory-cloud of Jehovah's presence shaded and lit up the camp, the hearts of Israel were on Egypt. Their faces were turned that way. It took Aaron's words to change their attitude, but after a while "they looked toward the wilderness" (v. 10). In these words, "they looked toward the wilderness," lies the key we are looking for. God had displayed His glory in judgment, both in Egypt and at the Red Sea; He would now display His glory in the wilderness.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The leader's own lesson first

Another writer notes that Moses had known this nearness to God himself before he called the people into it.

He desires the people to "come near" before the Lord who had heard their grumbling. He had known the effect in himself. Like a wise master-builder, he would lead his brothers into the same, though by a different path. The glory of the Lord, and the resources of the Lord, had already taught him. Now he wants the people to receive the same blessed teaching, even though their discontent and grumbling drew it out.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Glory in the form of food

The glory did not stop with the cloud. They were to see it again in the morning, and what came then was new on earth.

But more — in the morning they were to see the glory of Jehovah. And "in the morning dew lay around the camp. And when the dew had gone up," a new thing happened, one which had never been before on earth... "Manna?" — "What is this?" — the people exclaimed. It was God's glory in the wilderness — it was the gift of God.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

One writer links that gift to Christ Himself:

Exodus 16 teaches us much. It is where the manna first appears, and along with it the glory of God appeared in the wilderness. Those whose eyes were opened saw in Jesus here God manifest in the flesh, Emmanuel, come near to us to bless us.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

The same glory, a different effect

This first appearing of the glory is often set beside a second one that came later.

The second appearing of the glory came in very different circumstances, for Israel had bound themselves by a covenant of death to keep the whole law. The contrast between these two appearings of the divine glory is very striking. It shows the difference between the Lord's dealings with Israel under grace and under law. Those who seek to stand before God on the ground of law deal with a God who is a consuming fire. Those who deal with God in grace, as made known in Jesus, learn His goodness in the rich provision He has made for His people.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Complaint — grumbling at the leaders was grumbling at God; in the end all sin is against Him.

- Occasion — what people are became the very moment God showed what He is, a pattern seen from Eden to the cross.

- Grace — the glory drew near instead of striking; God answered a death-wish with the light of His presence.

- Direction — they saw the glory only when they turned from Egypt to face the wilderness, where God meant to display it.

- Gift — the glory came down to the ground as manna, pointing to Christ, who came down to feed His people on the way.

Exodus 16:11 · Darby

And Jehovah spoke to Moses, saying,

Israel is complaining in the desert, hungry and remembering the food of Egypt. The glory of the LORD has just appeared in the cloud. Now God Himself speaks to Moses. What will He say to a people who have complained against Him?

Grace, not judgment

God's answer is startling for what it leaves out: no rebuke, no punishment, no delay — only supply.

But grace, without judgment, answers their grumbling and provides for their need. The LORD heard them, but did not scold. They cried for bread, and He rained it down from heaven. He gave them meat every evening and bread every morning.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Who the complaint was against

God says He has heard the grumbling. The people thought their complaint was about their leaders.

Note, too, that grumbling against Moses and Aaron was grumbling against the Lord. (v. 8.) All sin is against God. (See Psalm 51:4; Luke 15:18-21.) That is why the Lord says, "I have heard the grumbling of the people of Israel."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why no plague fell here

The same cry for meat later, in Numbers 11, brought judgment. Commentators point to where Israel stood at each moment: before Sinai, or after it.

Exodus 16 shows us Israel murmuring again, but the Lord answers in nothing but grace… Wrath did come upon them another day. They despised the manna, insisted on meat, and kept on in their craving… But that was after the law came in. God then judged in righteousness the sinners who dared to make the blessing depend on their own power to obey it. But up to Sinai it was not law, but grace. "Where sin increased, grace abounded all the more." So the Lord told Moses to say, "At twilight you shall eat meat, and in the morning you shall be filled with bread. Then you shall know that I am the LORD your God."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What their sin drew out of God

The complaint did not drive God away. It became the moment His glory shone out. That pattern runs far beyond this chapter.

How precious this display of divine grace is! It shines against the dark background of man's sin, and that sin is the very thing that drew it out. Exposing what is in the heart of man brings out of the depths of God's heart all that He is in blessing to man… But at the cross we see man at his lowest, rejecting the Son of God. And there we see the heart of God fully revealed in grace.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Meat at evening, bread at morning

God promises two gifts. They do not teach the same thing.

The bread that Israel gathered every morning was only a picture of the true bread. Of that bread the Lord said, "if anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever" (John 6:51). But what about the meat in the evening — what may we learn from that? Does it not tell us how God provides for our bodily needs?… The quails are as much His gift as the bread; both are of His grace. The quails only met bodily needs, so they were not laid up before the Lord; but the manna, the bread from heaven, was.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Commentators differ over the quails. Some see God giving the people what they craved, not what they needed:

It seems we must draw a very clear distinction between the quails and the manna. God gave both to meet their hunger. But the quails came more in His chastening ways with a people who wanted what they had eaten as they sat by the pots of meat in Egypt. So the psalmist speaks of them craving in the wilderness and testing God in the desert: "He gave them what they asked, but sent leanness into their soul" (Psalm 106:14-15).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The last line follows an older translation. The ESV reads, "he gave them what they asked, but sent a wasting disease among them."

What the manna points to

The manna means more than daily food. Jesus later took it up and pointed to Himself.

But there is a far deeper meaning in the manna than this… Then comes the Lord's answer: "it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven." And He adds, "I am the bread of life." He is the reality the manna pictured — our God gives us food for this wilderness life.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard — the grumbling reached God, not just Moses. Complaints against His servants were complaints against Him.

- Answered — He sends food, not punishment — meat that evening, bread the next morning, and no scolding.

- Timed — the same craving met grace here and judgment in Numbers 11. Before Sinai it was grace; under the law, judgment.

- Displayed — their failure became the dark background for His glory. The same pattern reaches its height at the cross.

- Known — God fed them so they would know Him as the LORD their God. And the manna points on to the One who says, "I am the bread of life."

Exodus 16:12 · Darby

I have heard the murmurings of the children of Israel speak to them, saying, Between the two evenings ye shall eat flesh, and in the morning ye shall be filled with bread; and ye shall know that I am Jehovah your God.

Israel is hungry and complaining. God answers with food at both ends of the day, and He gives the reason: by that food they will know who their God is. Why does grumbling draw out supply instead of punishment? And why does God tie the knowledge of Himself to an ordinary evening meal and morning meal?

Murmuring Answered by Grace

Israel will demand meat again later, and that time ends very differently. One writer sets the two occasions side by side.

Exodus 16 shows us Israel murmuring again, but the Lord answers with nothing but grace. Yet, as Moses and Aaron said, the murmuring was against Him, and not against them... Wrath did come on them another day. They despised the manna, demanded meat, and kept on craving, when they should have been ashamed and grieved at their self-will and unbelief... But this was after the law came in. God was right to judge sinners who dared to make the blessing depend on their own power to obey it. But up to Sinai it was not law, but grace... Their absolute need was now plain. In the wilderness, who but God could supply bread for such a multitude?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Complaint as the Occasion of Glory

Their complaint did not drive God away. One commentator sees here a pattern that runs from Eden onward.

Their murmurings were the occasion of the display of the glory of the Lord. So the sight of what man is draws out of the depths of God's heart the revelation of what He is. It was so in the garden of Eden, and indeed all down the line of His dealings with man... Note, moreover, that murmuring against Moses and Aaron was murmuring against the Lord. All sin is really against God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Flesh at Evening, Bread in the Morning

The verse names two foods at two times of day. One writer weighs what each of them is for.

What may we learn from the meat given in the evening? Does it not tell us of the provision God makes to meet our bodily needs?... So, "in the evening quail came up and covered the camp." There was abundance. God provides for the natural needs of His saints... The evening quails meet every bodily need. In the same way, the morning bread teaches us to begin each day with Him who alone sustains the soul... The quails are as much His gift as the bread; both are of His grace. The quails only meet bodily needs, so they are not laid up before the Lord, but the manna, the bread from heaven, is.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Commentators differ over the quails. One writer finds no teaching in them at all.

The quails have no special teaching connected with them, while the manna is a very striking picture of the Lord Jesus. The quails were given to satisfy the desires of the people, but brought no blessing... God may hear the cry of His people, even in their unbelief, and grant them their desires — but for discipline rather than for present blessing.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

What They Would Come to Know

Verses 6 and 7 had already told them what evening and morning would each show.

What took place at evening? God gave them meat to eat. It was God's proof that He had brought them out of the land of Egypt, and that if He led them through the wilderness, He would feed them too. But the morning would show more than this. Then they would have not only proof that God had freed them from slavery; they would also see the glory of the LORD.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Bread That Points Beyond Itself

Jesus Himself takes up this desert food and reads it as pointing to Him.

There is a far deeper meaning in the manna than this. You remember how the Lord interprets it in John 6... "It was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven." Then He adds, "I am the bread of life." He is the fulfilment of the manna. Our God provides the food we need for this wilderness life. The wonder of it is so great that no one has ever been able to take it in. "God manifest in the flesh!"

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Given While They Slept

The bread arrives with the morning dew, before anyone is awake to work for it.

This is how divine grace serves, and they depend on it completely. No human hands bestowed this bread. God Himself showers it around their tents in the night while they sleep. It comes in the dew, the beautiful figure of the Spirit, who ministers Christ, and not Himself — the dew lifts and leaves the manna on the ground. But it lies there, an insignificant thing, and small as the frost.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Complaint — Israel aimed the murmuring at Moses and Aaron, but it landed on God. All sin is against Him.

- Grace — before Sinai, God answered that complaint with food, not judgment. The same demand met wrath later, once the law had come in.

- Glory — what man is drew out what God is. Their complaint became the occasion for His glory to appear.

- Gift — quails and manna both came from His hand: one feeds the body, one feeds the soul. Only the manna had a place before the Lord, and only the manna pictures Christ.

- Knowledge — evening proved He had brought them out of Egypt. Morning showed His glory in bread that fell while they slept — the bread Jesus points to as Himself.

Exodus 16:13 · Darby

And it came to pass in the evening, that quails came up, and covered the camp; and in the morning the dew lay round the camp.

Israel had complained against God in the desert. His answer came as food, not punishment — and commentators read both the evening birds and the morning dew as pointing far beyond one meal.

Grace, Not Judgment

God had every reason to rebuke them. Notice what He sent instead.

But grace, without judgment, answers their murmuring, and provides for their need. Jehovah heard them, but did not scold them. They cried for bread, and He rained it down from heaven. He gave them flesh every evening, and bread every morning.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Notice also how the bread reached them.

So divine grace ministers, and they are dependent entirely upon it. No human hands gave this bread. God Himself showers it around their tents in the night while they sleep.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

What the Quails Supplied

The birds settled on the camp in the evening and met plain, physical hunger. One writer asks what that teaches.

Does it not tell us of the provision God makes for our bodily needs? After the work of the day the body needs refreshment... He who sent the quails is the same One who said, "Do not be anxious about tomorrow"... And just as the evening quails meet the body's needs, so the morning bread teaches us to begin each day with Him who alone sustains the soul... The quails are as much His gift as the bread; both are of His grace. The quails, since they only meet the body's needs, are not laid up before the Lord, but the manna, the bread from heaven, is.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Evening Proof, Morning Glory

The evening gift told Israel something about God. The morning gift showed them more.

We take our stand with the hungry people at the end of the anxious day. And look — "In the evening quail came up and covered the camp." Here was the flesh they wanted. Jehovah, their salvation, had not appointed Israel to perish! It was He who had brought them out from the land of Egypt, and this the quails showed to Israel. But there was more — in the morning they were to see the glory of Jehovah... It was God's glory in the wilderness — it was the gift of God.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Half a Verse and a Whole Chapter

The proportions of the text carry a message.

Only part of one verse deals with the miracle of the quails. All the rest of our chapter gives the details of the manna. That is because the manna is a picture fulfilled in Christ, the wilderness food of His saints. The Lord's own words in John 6 make this clear. The manna was the picture, but He is the "true bread from heaven."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The same writer looks at the flight itself, and at what happened when the miracle came again later, under the law:

The word of the Lord came true in an extraordinary flight of quails that evening. This bird migrates and is easy to catch, but the huge numbers settling on the camp made the event a miracle. Nothing more is said here about them. But when this miracle was repeated under the law, judgment followed, as we see in Numbers 11:31-34.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why the Quails Come First

One writer sees the order as deliberate: flesh before bread, evening before morning.

A flight of quails comes before the manna, in the evening. It supplies the people with the flesh they had been promised. We know well what this death as the food of life means, so it raises no difficulty here. The Lord Himself, in His sermon on this text of manna (John 6), assures us that we must not only eat His flesh, but drink His blood, or we have no life in us. His person and His work are both necessary to us. And His sacrifice must come first. In the same way, Israel could eat the lamb only inside the house sprinkled with blood. So the quails come first, and in the evening.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The Dew That Went Up

Commentators differ on what the dew pictures. One connects it with the Holy Spirit:

But notice, it was in connection with the dew that the manna came. It is the Holy Spirit who makes Christ our food; and may there not be a fitness in the dew being withdrawn so that the manna may be seen? The Spirit always presents Christ and none but Him. But the same things that removed the dew also melted the manna. The sun of this world soon drives away, as far as our enjoyment goes, what should be our food.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another reads the same dew as a picture of Scripture:

Water in Scripture is a figure of the word of God in its cleansing or purifying power. The Israelites got manna in connection with dew — we receive Christ through the word.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Murmuring — Israel complained, and God did not punish them. Grace answered with supper and breakfast.

- Gift — No human hand brought it. God scattered it around their tents while they slept, so they lived on pure dependence.

- Evening — The quails proved that He who brought them out would feed them. God cares for plain bodily need.

- Morning — The evening gave proof. The morning gave glory: God's own gift in the wilderness.

- Christ — Half a verse for the quails, a chapter for the manna. Flesh first, then bread: His sacrifice, then His life as our daily food.

Exodus 16:14 · Darby

And when the dew that lay [round it] was gone up, behold, on the face of the wilderness there was [something] fine, granular, fine as hoar-frost, on the ground.

The people had grumbled for food, and God answered by covering the desert floor with something no one had ever seen before. This verse describes what Israel woke up to. Commentators read every detail — its smallness, its shape, its link with the dew — as a picture of Christ given for His people in the wilderness.

Older translations read "a small round thing, as small as the frost on the ground." Several writers below comment on that word "round."

Grace, Not Judgment

The manna came after the people complained.

God stamped the character of grace on this gift of the manna, given to meet the people's need. Their grumbling should have brought down judgment. Instead, God met it by supplying this food.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What they saw had never been on earth before, and they had no name for it.

And when the dew lifted, a new thing appeared, one which had never been on earth before. "Manna?" — "What is this?" — the people exclaimed. It was God's glory in the wilderness — it was the gift of God.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

What the Manna Stands For

Jesus took up the story of the manna and applied it to Himself.

This then is the meaning of the manna: the bread which God gave the Israelites to eat in the wilderness. It is therefore the proper wilderness food for the Lord's people. The Jews once said to our Lord, "Our fathers ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written, 'He gave them bread from heaven to eat.'" He replied: "Truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is he who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world." (John 6:32-33.) The manna, then, is clearly a type of Christ — a picture of Him as He was in this world. He came down from heaven, and He becomes the food of His people as they pass through the wilderness.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Small and Round

Two words describe how it looked: small, and round. Each says something about Jesus.

Second, it looked like "a small round thing," as small as the tiny specks of frost. The Son of God came down from heaven into manhood, so that He might give His flesh for the life of the world. In doing so He did indeed make Himself small and of no account in the eyes of men. It was also round, not angular and uneven. In the same way, in Christ once humbled here, there was an evenness that came from perfection in every detail.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Another writer reads the round shape differently: it shows how easy Christ was to reach.

The manna was round, picturing how accessible Christ is. A round thing is not like a square or an oval. Wherever you touch its edge, you are the same distance from its center. So the round shape shows how easy our Lord was to reach — young and old, rich and poor, religious and irreligious. Think of the woman who was a sinner, and Mary Magdalene, out of whom seven demons were cast. Think of the dying thief, and the children whom the disciples would have driven away. All alike could reach Him and be blessed.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Lying on the Ground

It lay on the ground, and it looked like nothing special.

It is on the ground, so they must stoop to gather it. It lies on the face of the wilderness — something fine, as if pounded to pieces, fine as the frost on the ground. It does not look like much. It carries marks as if of rough handling. It reminds us of the prophet's words: "no beauty that we should desire Him." "What is it?" they say; for they did not know what it was. "The world knew Him not."

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Found Where the Dew Had Been

The manna lay where the dew had been.

The manna was found where the dew of heaven had fallen around the camp. The barren wilderness received the dew on its face. The moisture gathered unseen and fell from above. Where it settled on the ground, God spread the angels' food for man — "He gave them bread from heaven to eat." So we have both before us: the Spirit of God, who presents Christ to us, and Christ our food... We must gather our spiritual food diligently, day by day, early in the morning before the sun is up.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

"Behold" — It Is There for You

Older translations add the word "Behold" here. One writer turns it straight on the reader.

"Behold" — on the face of the wilderness at this very moment, despite all the bareness and roughness of your path. Behold, for you, God's own provision. Stoop, gather it up, and it will be sweet to your taste, and it will supply strength to you for all your desert way! Yes, weak as you are, surrounded by sorrow as you are, or, sadly, proud as you are, it is there waiting for you... not covered up, but out in the open... It is for every saint of God.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace — Their grumbling should have brought judgment. God sent food instead, and stamped the gift with His own grace.

- Gift — What lay on the sand had never existed before. It was the gift of God, and it was God's glory in the wilderness.

- Small — Fine as frost, lying on the ground, with nothing about it to attract. Coming down into manhood, the Son of God made Himself of no account in men's eyes.

- Round — Even in every detail, and near at every point. The sinful woman, the dying thief and the children could all reach Him.

- Gather — It is not hidden but out in the open, waiting for every saint of God. Stoop early, take it daily, and it feeds the whole desert way.

Exodus 16:15 · Darby

And the children of Israel saw [it], and said one to another, What is it? for they did not know what it was. And Moses said to them, This is the bread which Jehovah has given you to eat.

Israel had grumbled for food in the desert, and the next morning something they had never seen lay on the ground. Their name for it was a question, and Moses answered by naming the Giver.

The Name That Stayed a Question

Israel saw the small round thing on the ground and had no name for it. Their name became a question. Early English versions kept that sense, and one writer shows what is lost when translators leave the Hebrew word as it stands.

"It is manna" (Ex. 16:15) has no meaning to a reader who does not know Hebrew, but translated as the earliest versions had it — "What is this?" — the passage is simple enough.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The name stuck because the puzzle never cleared up.

The people say to one another Man-hu? "What is it?" And the question remained as its name, for no one ever really found out what it was — nor ever will. But something we know: it is the sustenance and strength of the redeemed soul.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Grace Answering Complaint

The bread arrived after the people had grumbled about food.

The mark of grace is on this gift of the manna, given to meet the people's need. Their murmurings did not bring down judgment. Instead, God met them with this food.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Moses' Answer

The people asked what it was; Moses told them who gave it. Commentators read that answer through Jesus' own use of the story in John's Gospel.

This, then, is the meaning of the manna: the bread which God gave the Israelites to eat in the wilderness. It is therefore the proper wilderness food for the Lord's people. The Jews said to our Lord, "Our fathers ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written, 'He gave them bread from heaven to eat.'" He replied, "Truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven." So the manna is plainly a type of Christ — Christ as He was in this world. He came down from heaven, and in that character He becomes the food of His people as they pass through the wilderness.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Small, and Unrecognised

Nobody could tell what it was by looking at it. One writer hears an echo of how the world treated Christ Himself.

It lies upon the ground, so they must stoop to gather it — on the face of the wilderness — something fine, as if pounded to pieces, fine as the frost on the ground. This is how the people see it, who have not yet tasted it, and do not know what it is. It clearly does not look like much; it carries marks as if of rough handling. It reminds us of the prophet's words, "no beauty that we should desire him." "What is it?" they say; for they did not know what it was. "The world did not know Him."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Found Where the Dew Had Been

Where the manna lay mattered: it rested on ground the dew had covered.

The barren wilderness received the dew on its face. The moisture gathered unseen and fell from above, and where it settled on the ground, God spread the angels' food for man — "He gave them bread from heaven to eat." So we have both before us: the Spirit of God, who presents Christ to us, and Christ our food. "The bread of God is he who comes down from heaven" (John 6:33), and we find Him, we may say, where the Holy Spirit presents Him to us.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Gathered Fresh, Every Morning

What God gave could not be stockpiled.

The heavenly manna must be gathered fresh every morning. Yesterday's manna will not do for today, nor today's for tomorrow. We must feed on Christ every day, with fresh energy of the Spirit, or else we shall stop growing. What is more, we must make Christ our first object. We must seek Him "early," before "other things" have had time to take hold of our poor, easily-swayed hearts.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Two Kinds of Food

One writer sets the manna beside a second food, and says we need both.

You and I cannot feed on that manna unless we come to it through death. Manna, then, is Christ humbled, as He was in this scene. "The old grain of the land" is Christ glorified. You and I have to eat both, because we are in the wilderness and yet going to heaven. We are on our road home to God, and the Spirit of God carries our souls into heavenly places now. You must eat both.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- The question. "What is it?" was Israel's reaction, and it became the food's name. No one ever solved the mystery, yet this food is the strength of the redeemed soul.

- The giver. Moses did not define the substance; he named the Source. The answer to "what is it?" is "bread the Lord has given you."

- The Person. Jesus took up this story and pointed past Moses to His Father. The Father gives the true bread from heaven, so the manna pictures Christ come down and humbled.

- The daily habit. The manna could not be stored. Feed on Christ fresh each morning, before other things crowd in.

- The full table. Manna is Christ humbled for the desert; the grain of Canaan is Christ glorified. The traveller eats both.

Exodus 16:16 · Darby

This is the thing which Jehovah has commanded Gather of it every man according to what he can eat, an omer a poll, [according to] the number of your persons ye shall take every man for those that are in his tent.

The bread lies on the ground, and God attaches a rule to it: one set measure each, and every man gathers for his whole tent. Commentators read that rule as a picture of how a believer feeds on Christ, and of who else depends on it.

What the Bread Pictures

The manna is more than desert food. Commentators identify it with Christ Himself, in His lowly life on earth.

What, then, is the Manna for the believer? It is Christ come in human flesh — a humbled Christ… So Christ is the Manna in all that He was in the flesh. He is the Manna in the expression of what He was, both as the revealer of the Father and as the perfect man. His grace, compassion, sympathy, tenderness, and love; His meekness and lowliness of heart; His patience, forbearance, and long-suffering; His example — all these are found in the Manna. God has given us that Manna as our food for the journey through the wilderness.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Omer: One Measure for All

The measure is fixed. Older translations read "an omer for every man," and one writer shows what that says about God's thought for each person.

In the giving of the manna, you remember, God said, "an omer for every man." Whether one gathered much or little, it was all measured. Each one had his full quota — "an omer for every man." A full Christ for every man was the thought of God… So the omer was the measure of Christ coming into this world. He came to meet the need of man, and in doing so to show the grace and glory of God.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

The omer was an everyday household measure. So the gift came sized to the person, not to the crowd.

An omer was the measure people used in the tents of Israel for ordinary purposes. It held the usual portion of a man's daily food. So it made the gift of the manna personal to the need of every single person in the camp.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

"According to His Eating"

The verse ties each man's portion to what he can eat. One writer turns that into a test of the believer's desire.

First, they were to gather it every man according to his eating (vv. 16-18). As a result, he who gathered much had nothing left over, and he who gathered little had no lack. The appetite governed the amount collected. How strikingly true this is of the believer! We all have as much of Christ as we desire — no more, and no less. If our desires are large, if we open our mouth wide, He will fill it. We cannot desire too much, nor be disappointed when we desire. On the other hand, if we barely feel our need, we shall have only a little of Christ.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

How does one fixed measure fit appetites that differ? Commentators give two explanations.

Some explain that although several in a family went out to gather the manna, when it was brought home and measured it came to just an omer for each of them. The more likely explanation is that an omer was the average portion for each. Some needed more and others less, so every one gathered "according to his eating," according to what he knew he would need. That way every one had enough, and nothing was wasted.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Cost of Gathering

The bread lay free on the ground, yet nobody was fed without going out for it. One writer notes the effort and the posture it took.

Human responsibility went together with divine goodness. The heaven-sent provision lay around Israel's camp, yet each Israelite still had to be diligent to make that provision his own portion… To gather the manna, a man had to stoop, for it fell on the ground. Without question, the lowliest find for themselves the most of Christ.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Gathering for the Tent

The verse does not stop with the individual. It reaches the whole household.

But they must gather the manna "according to each one's need" (v. 16). This would take time, and would also mean bending down. First it says "an omer for each person." God would provide for each one individually. But it is also specifically said that each man should gather for all who were in his tent. The head of the household is responsible to share with his whole house the preciousness of the Lord Jesus.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Carried into the New Testament

The New Testament takes this scene out of the desert and applies it to money given for believers in need.

The earlier part of the passage comes up again in 2 Corinthians 8:15. It shows that when believers make a collection for poor fellow believers, this divine principle of "equality" should be worked out: what some have in abundance supplies the need of others.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — the manna is Christ in His lowly life on earth, God's own provision for the journey.

- Measured — the omer is one fixed portion for each person: a full Christ for every man was God's thought.

- Gathered — the supply is equal, but the intake follows appetite; we have as much of Christ as we desire, no more and no less.

- Stooped for — the bread lay on the ground, so a man had to bend; the lowliest find the most of Christ.

- Shared — each man gathered for his whole tent; the same principle of equality later shapes giving among believers.

Exodus 16:17 · Darby

And the children of Israel did so, and gathered, some much, some little.

The manna has just fallen for the first time, and the whole camp goes out to gather it. The amounts differ from person to person — a detail commentators read as a picture of how believers feed on Christ, and as the seed of a rule Paul later applies to money.

Grace behind the supply

The chapter opens with complaint, not faith. Heaven answers with bread:

Exodus 16 shows us Israel murmuring again, but the Lord answers with nothing but grace... Their absolute need was now plain. In the wilderness, who but God could supply bread for such a multitude? But He did supply it generously, and at their doors. "Whoever gathered much had nothing left over, and whoever gathered little had no lack. Each of them gathered as much as he could eat." ... It is Christ, the true manna from heaven, who gives eternal life and brings us into rest.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Given, but still to be gathered

The bread lay all around the camp, but nobody ate it without going out for it. One writer puts God's giving and man's effort side by side:

But the manna had to be gathered. Human responsibility went together with God's goodness. The heaven-sent provision lay all around Israel's camp. Even so, each Israelite had to work at gathering it before it became his own portion... To gather the manna, a man had to stoop, because it fell on the ground. Beyond all argument, the lowliest find for themselves the most of Christ.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Appetite sets the amount

Why did some gather more and some less? The supply was not the limit — appetite was:

First, each man was to gather as much as he could eat (vv. 16-18)... The appetite governed the amount collected. How strikingly true this is of the believer! We all have as much of Christ as we desire — no more, and no less. If our desires are large, if we open our mouth wide, He will fill it. We cannot desire too much, nor be disappointed when we desire. On the other hand, if we are only feebly conscious of our need, only a little of Christ will be supplied.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Hours spent are not the same thing as hunger, and another writer keeps the two apart:

You cannot have too much of Christ... On the other hand, the amount we have does not depend on the time or effort we spend gathering. Not the amount of time, but the amount of heart, counts with God, and that is where the fruit is.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Unequal amounts, no shame

The verse notes the difference between the big gatherer and the small one, and blames neither. One writer keeps it that way:

When the children of Israel gathered the manna, some gathered more than others (v. 17). But there was no difficulty. The larger amount was not too much, and the smaller was not too little. Each had gathered just what he could eat. One may have a larger capacity to enjoy Christ, another a smaller capacity. Neither one carries any stigma.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

God does the measuring

Nobody ended up with too much, and nobody with too little. One writer credits that to God, not to the gatherers' skill:

God adjusted the supply to the demand with a wisdom and power that ruled out surplus just as much as shortage. He who gave the manna from heaven measured it exactly, whatever the differing measures in man's hands. And we have to do with the same God, and He surely regulates everything in the church with no less care and love.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

How Paul uses the scene

Paul quotes this incident in his appeal for a collection, which pushes the meaning past the personal lesson about appetite:

Verse 15 quotes Exodus 16:18 in support of this. Reading Exodus, one might suppose the verse simply meant that each gatherer of the manna was able to judge his appetite rightly and gather accordingly. The way the verse is quoted here shows, however, that there is more in it than that, since it is cited in support of the principle of sharing with others what God may have entrusted to us.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how the "no surplus, no lack" result came about — some report an older explanation that the measured amount turned out to be an omer each by miracle, while others hold that each person simply gathered what he knew he needed. Either way, the outcome is what Paul presses into service:

Some explained that when several from one family gathered and brought the manna home to measure, it came to just an omer each. The more likely explanation is that an omer was the average portion for each person, but some needed more and others less. So everyone gathered as much as he could eat — what he knew he would need. That way everyone had enough and nothing was wasted. The earlier part of this passage is quoted in 2 Corinthians 8:15. It shows that a collection for poor believers should carry out this divine principle of "equality" — the abundance of some meeting the need of others.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace gives. The bread falls on a murmuring camp; the supply answers need, not merit.

- Grace is gathered. What God gives still has to be picked up, and it is the lowly who gather most.

- Grace fits appetite. The amount taken in follows desire and heart, not clock-time — and you cannot desire too much.

- Grace shames no one. Capacities differ; the large gatherer and the small one are both left without blame.

- Grace overflows outward. God measured so that none had too much and none too little. That becomes Paul's rule for sharing money with poorer believers.

Exodus 16:18 · Darby

And they measured with the omer then he that gathered much had nothing over, and he that gathered little wanted nothing they had gathered every man according to the measure of his eating.

Israel is in the desert, fed each morning by bread that appears on the ground, and each family gathers it with a measuring pot called an omer. When they measure what they gathered, the differences between them disappear — and centuries later the New Testament reaches back to this line to settle a question about money among Christians.

The measure and the miracle

The verse turns on the omer, the measure used to check each portion. Commentators differ on how it worked out.

The Rabbis explain it this way. Several in a family went out to gather the manna. When they brought it home and measured it, it came to just an omer for each of them. A more likely explanation is this. An omer was the average portion for each person, but some needed more and others less. So each one gathered "as much as he could eat," what he knew he would need. Everyone had enough, and nothing went to waste. 2 Corinthians 8:15 quotes the first part of this passage. It shows that a collection for poor believers should carry out this divine principle of "equality," where the abundance of some supplies the need of others.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Either way, the outcome is God's arithmetic, not man's.

The One who gave the manna from heaven measured it exactly, whatever the differing measures in man's hands.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Three things in one sentence

Three truths sit inside this one sentence: God's side, man's side, and the result.

These words hold three things. First, on God's part, He makes equal provision for each — an omer for every person. Second, on man's part, "each of them gathered as much as he could eat." The appetite governed the amount collected. Third, whatever the amount gathered, "whoever gathered much had nothing left over, and whoever gathered little had no lack." Both the large desire and the small one were satisfied by the amount each one obtained.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Appetite sets the portion

As a picture of the believer's food, the verse puts the limit in our desire, not in the supply.

We all have as much of Christ as we desire — no more, and no less. If our desires are large, if we open our mouth wide, He will fill it. We cannot desire too much, and we will never be disappointed when we desire. On the other hand, if we barely feel our need, we will receive only a little of Christ.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Hours spent do not set that appetite.

You cannot have too much of Christ… On the other hand, the amount we will have does not depend on the time or effort we spend gathering. Not the amount of time, but the amount of heart counts with God, and that is where fruit is found.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

No stigma in a smaller basket

But what about the believer who takes in less than someone else?

One may have a larger capacity to enjoy Christ, another a smaller capacity, but no stigma is attached to either.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The difference between believers can look wide in daily life.

This principle holds true of soul-hunger. God's people have such different appetites for heavenly things! Some find half an hour over the Bible a long time; others meditate in it day and night. Yet though this is true of us, all the gathered manna measured out at an omer for every man. Every man had enough. Every man's need was fully met, for the measure was the satisfaction of every man.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Equality in giving

The New Testament quotes this verse in an appeal for poor believers.

Reading Exodus, you might think the verse simply meant that each gatherer of the manna could judge his appetite and gather to match it. But the way the verse is quoted here shows there is more in it than that. It supports the principle of sharing with others what God may have entrusted to us.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The "equality" aimed at is not sameness of income.

This is not necessarily an equality in wealth or social position. It means that each one is equally delivered from need… The amount of manna gathered could differ a great deal from person to person. Some gathered much and some little. But all were alike in this: every need was met.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

And God reaches that result through people, with a further purpose in it.

That was God's thought and desire for them all. But He does it through human hands, binding the hearts of His people to each other and drawing out their love. The gift, if it amounted to anything, was only the expression of that love.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Measure — God set the omer, and He measured exactly what fell, however much ended up in each person's hands.

- Appetite — Hunger decided what each one took home. We have as much of Christ as we desire, and heart counts more than hours.

- Enough — Nobody had too much or too little. The large appetite and the small one were both satisfied, so a smaller capacity carries no shame.

- Sharing — The New Testament lifts this line into Christian giving: what God entrusts to one is meant to flow to another.

- Equality — The goal is not equal wealth. It is that every need is met — and God does it through His people's hands, binding their hearts together.

Exodus 16:19 · Darby

And Moses said to them, Let no man leave [any] of it until the morning.

God fed Israel in the desert with manna, the heavenly bread they gathered fresh each morning. Moses adds one rule to the gift: keep none of it overnight — a day's food for a day, and no store for tomorrow.

A day's portion for a day

The rule set how often Israel had to come back to God. It sets the same rhythm for anyone feeding on Christ.

The manna could not be stored for future use. No one was to leave any of it until the morning; but some disobeyed this command, only to find that what they had left had become corrupt. No — the food collected today cannot sustain us tomorrow. We can feed on Christ only by a present exercise of soul. Much damage has come to souls from forgetting this principle. They have had a rich meal of manna, and they have tried to feed on it for days; but it has always ended in disappointment and loss instead of blessing. God only gives the portion of a day in its day, and no more.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

No store, no independence

The daily supply left no cupboard to fall back on. That was the point.

It was bread that showed them, morning by morning, that they had to depend on Him. Had He withheld the manna one day, they would have had nothing to eat; for they could not keep it till the next day — "it bred worms and stank." The Lord will not allow us to lay up anything in store — no, not even grace — that would tend to lead us into independence of Himself; it will turn to evil if we do. He showed His people constant grace in the way He dealt with them. But He never took them out of the condition of dependence on Himself, and He never will take us out of it.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

There is another side to it. Daily bread meant daily proof of love.

It is impossible in grace to make provision for tomorrow, or to rest on the grace of yesterday. There is no resting place but God: absolute dependence on Himself is what God desires. God remembers Israel every morning for forty years (the sabbath was no real exception). The unbeliever may like to receive God's gifts; the believer loves the One who gives them. If God had only given the manna once a month, He would have shown His love only once, and not every day. God shows every moment how He loves us. If our eyes are not content with seeing the manna every morning, we despise the love of God. Are we happy to be completely dependent on God?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Gathered early, before anything else

Nothing carried over to the next day. So the gathering had to come first, before anything else took the heart.

The heavenly manna must be gathered fresh every morning. Yesterday's manna will not do for today, nor today's for tomorrow. We must feed upon Christ every day, with fresh energy of the Spirit, or we shall stop growing. What is more, we must make Christ our primary object. We must seek Him "early," before "other things" have had time to take hold of our poor, easily captured hearts. Many of us, sadly, fail here. We give Christ a secondary place, and the result is that we are left weak and barren.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Holding on to what grace gave

One writer applies the kept manna to Job. Job was taken up with what grace had produced in him.

He looks at the manna placed in his hand; he keeps some of it until the morning, and it breeds worms and stinks. (Ex. 16:19-20.) The flesh lays claim to the effects of grace, and Job's conscience and heart become less impressed with the abounding goodness and perfect holiness of God. Taken up with his own goodness, he loses sight of God's goodness in the same measure.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What may be kept after all

The ban belonged to the wilderness road. One writer points out where the same manna could be kept.

Although manna could not be kept even for one day's need in the wilderness, it could be kept for the land of Canaan. And so we shall find that while we cannot feed on yesterday's experience and make it satisfy today's need, it will be for rich blessing when reviewed with our blessed Lord above.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Today. God gives a day's portion for that day, and no more. Yesterday's meal cannot carry you through today.

- Dependence. God lets us store nothing — not even grace — that would make us independent of Him.

- Love. Daily bread is daily proof of love. Manna once a month would have shown that love once a month.

- Freshness. Seek Christ early, before other things take the heart. Give Him second place and the soul goes weak and barren.

- Glory. Yesterday's manna spoils in the desert. Yet that same experience, reviewed with the Lord above, will be rich blessing.

Exodus 16:20 · Darby

But they did not hearken to Moses; and some men left of it until the morning; then worms bred in it and it stank. And Moses was wroth with them.

God had begun sending bread from heaven, with one rule attached: gather it fresh each morning and leave nothing over. Some kept a portion back, and by morning it was crawling with worms.

The bread that came down from heaven

The manna was not a random desert food. Commentators read it as a picture of Christ, and they take that reading from the Lord Himself.

This then is the meaning of the manna: the bread which God gave the Israelites to eat in the wilderness. It is therefore the proper wilderness food for the Lord's people. The Jews said to our Lord, "Our fathers ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written, 'He gave them bread from heaven to eat.'" He replied, "Truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is he who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world." (John 6:32-33.) The manna, it is clear, is a picture of Christ — of Christ as He was in this world. He is the One who came down from heaven, and as such He becomes the food of His people while they pass through the wilderness.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why the rule was there at all

The ban on storing it was deliberate. Those who kept a private reserve had misread the food in their hands.

In the way of appropriating this heaven-sent food, God set up a test. Each day the people were to learn afresh their dependence on God, who gives us our bread day by day. They were not to store up for tomorrow, as if a heavenly supply, like an earthly one, might run out. Those who hoarded it found only worms and a foul smell for their disobedience. In the hoarding there was not only a misuse of the food, there was also a misunderstanding of its character.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

No such thing as a stockpile

The failure was not laziness in gathering. It was the attempt to store up what God sends fresh, and writers apply that to believers who live on past experience.

If spiritual sloth fails to gather the manna, spiritual stinginess cannot keep it. There is no such thing as a hoard of spirituality. Daily we must feed on Christ. Yesterday's grace will not do for today. How this strikes at the root of "attainments in holiness." We practically have only as much of Christ as we enjoy at this present moment. We are never to look back on our past experiences with self-satisfaction: if we do, the corruption of spiritual pride soon shows itself.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Gathering is not eating

Verse 20 is about manna the people had already gathered. Gathering it was not enough.

There were some who did not take the trouble to eat all they had gathered, and leaving it until the next day, it bred worms and stank. So it became worse than useless… We may apply this. What we gather of Christ from the Scriptures is for our food and enjoyment now. It is not something to store away and display to others. If we treat it that way it will only stink when we display it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Christian in name only

Rotting manna announces itself. Writers apply this to a life that carries Christ's name without feeding on Him.

The manna had to be eaten on the same day it was gathered, except on the sixth day, because of the seventh day of rest. Think of the unconverted person who claims to follow Christ. He speaks the words Christ spoke when He was here in lowliness and humility, but he does not take Christ into his being and life. He has no real hunger for the heavenly bread. He has never felt his need of the Saviour as a lost sinner. He answers to the manna kept overnight.

after_note: DELETE-none He is a Christian by profession. But he does not take hold of Christ as his life, so Christ in His grace and lowliness does not mark his own life. And so, as it was with Israel long ago, the name of the Lord that he professes becomes offensive to others.

H J Vine

The one portion that could be kept

There is one exception, and it keeps this from ending in loss.

In the wilderness, manna could not be kept even for one day's need. Yet it could be kept for the land of Canaan. So we cannot feed on yesterday's experience and make it satisfy today's need. But that experience will be rich blessing when we review it with our blessed Lord above.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Gift. The manna pictures Christ come down from heaven — food God gives for the journey, not something the people produced.

- Test. Gathering fresh each day taught dependence; hoarding treated a heavenly supply as if it might run out.

- Decay. Kept overnight, the manna bred worms. Writers apply that to living on yesterday's enjoyment, which breeds spiritual pride.

- Display. What we gather of Christ is for eating now, not for storing up to show others; used that way it only turns foul.

- Keepsake. What could not be kept in the wilderness could be kept for Canaan — yesterday's experience is not lost, but reviewed one day with the Lord above.

Exodus 16:21 · Darby

And they gathered it every morning, every man as much as he could eat; and when the sun became hot, it melted.

In the wilderness, Israel ate a food that came fresh each morning and vanished by mid-morning. Commentators read this rhythm as a picture of how a believer feeds on Christ, and the timing, the measure and the melting each carry weight.

What the manna pictures

The bread lying on the ground pictures Christ — and one particular side of Him.

The manna, I need not say, is Christ, the bread of God from heaven, to be our food. It is Christ come down, Christ in all the circumstances of an earthly life, to sustain the life of His people... Here then we have, not a Christ in glory, but a Christ humbled — all that is in His blessed person to support and nourish us during our wilderness journey.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Given, yet still to be gathered

God sent the food, but no one ate without going out for it. Even the body's posture carried a lesson.

But the manna had to be gathered. God's goodness came with human responsibility. The heaven-sent food lay all around Israel's camp, but each Israelite still had to work hard to make it his own portion... In gathering the manna, man had to stoop, for it fell upon the ground; and, without contradiction, the lowliest find for themselves the most of Christ.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The gathering has a time and a place.

I must gather the manna, gather Christ, early in the day, to be properly fed for the day. I can only gather Christ out of Scripture, so that is what makes the reading of the Scripture, and the study of the Scripture, so important.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

As much as he could eat

Appetite set each man's share. The same measure works on the soul.

The appetite governed the amount collected. How strikingly true this is of the believer! We all have as much of Christ as we desire — no more, and no less. If our desires are large, if we open our mouth wide, He will fill it. We cannot desire too much, and we will never be disappointed when we desire. On the other hand, if we are only faintly aware of our need, we will receive only a little of Christ.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Morning by morning — why yesterday will not do

The repeated "morning by morning" rules out a stockpile. Each day starts with an empty basket.

The manna was so pure and delicate that it could not bear contact with earth... So it is with the people of God now. The heavenly manna must be gathered fresh every morning. Yesterday's manna will not do for today, nor today's for tomorrow. We must feed upon Christ every day, with fresh energy of the Spirit, or else we shall cease to grow... Only Christ can nourish and sustain the new life in the believer: "As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever feeds on me, he also will live because of me." (John 6:57)

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

When the sun grew hot

The melting sets a deadline. Writers read the heat as the day's own pressures.

But this heavenly food is most sensitive; it does not tarry after the sun has risen, when this world's attractions or cares absorb the mind. If Christ is to be the food of our souls, we need the "early rising" that Scripture speaks of again and again — the purpose of heart that overcomes our natural laziness... Where Christ's things are given the first place, there will always be food and sustenance for the soul. But when "the cares of the world and the deceitfulness of riches" come in, the heavenly manna melts away.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Turned into practice, this makes the first hour of a day a fair test of the whole.

It is a good thing to see the face of the Lord Jesus by faith before we see any other face. Time spent with Him gives us power before we start the day's duties... The way the first part of the morning engages us often tells the real state of our souls.

Modernised from H H SnellOriginal wording

A window that will one day close

One writer sees the melting as a picture of something still ahead.

The manna disappeared when the sun grew hot: it melted. In the sanctuary and in the home they still stored it up. But no one saw it out in the open once the sun shone in full splendour over the earth... when our blessed Lord shines out as the Sun of righteousness and reigns in supreme splendour over the earth... there will no more be seen on the face of the wilderness the heavenly man in lowliness... Not that there is any change in our Lord Jesus Christ Himself. The surroundings and circumstances change, but not Jesus. They also stored the manna inside, out of public sight; and in that coming day of glory and rest, those who are within will have the high honour of sharing the "hidden manna" (Rev. 2:17).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — the manna is Christ come down in lowliness, God's own provision lying ready on the wilderness floor.

- Gathered — heaven's gift still asks for your diligence; you find this food by stooping, and in Scripture.

- Measured — appetite set the amount then, and it sets your portion now: as much of Christ as you desire, no more and no less.

- Fresh — "morning by morning" forbids a stockpile; yesterday's supply will not carry today.

- Timed — the day's heat melts whatever you leave, so what takes first place in the morning shapes the rest.

Exodus 16:22 · Darby

And it came to pass on the sixth day, that they gathered twice as much bread, two omers for one; and all the princes of the assembly came and told Moses.

On the sixth day in the wilderness the manna came double, and the leaders of Israel brought the news to Moses. The extra bread announced the Sabbath — a rest God supplied before He ever commanded it.

Rest before the rule

The order of events matters.

God provides their rest before He commands it. He gives them the food for the Sabbath before He even mentions the Sabbath. They rest not merely as a duty, but as a privilege.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

That silence is itself instructive. God had not yet issued a rule about the seventh day, but He had done something the people could read.

If there is a true way of learning God's mind, it is by weighing what He does as well as what He says. The God who had given Israel the manna gave them a double portion on the sixth day, but none on the seventh. Was this pointless? Was it not for the express purpose of guarding against any activity on His people's part, even gathering manna, on the seventh day? All the leaders came and told Moses that on the sixth day they gathered twice as much bread. Moses told them this was what the LORD had said: tomorrow is a day of solemn rest, a holy Sabbath to the LORD.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Sabbath handed over as a gift

God later names the reason for the double portion.

Notice that the Sabbath comes here as a gift. "The LORD has given you the Sabbath." Further on in this book we will find it put in the form of a law, with a curse and a judgment attached if people disobey.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Where this gift falls in Israel's history matters.

Exodus 16:5, 22, 30 — given as a gift in grace to the people while they were under grace, before the law.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Bread first, then rest

The Sabbath does not appear in Israel's story at random. Notice how much has to happen first.

The lamb is killed. The Passover blood is sprinkled. The Lord brings out His redeemed people. They sing the song of redemption. God gives the manna from heaven. And then, and not till then, He formally sets up the Sabbath.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

The manna pictures Christ, and the day of rest is joined to it.

"Sabbath" means rest. If the connection here is a picture — and it surely must be — then it teaches this: we find rest for our hearts by taking and enjoying Christ as the Bread from heaven.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Manna that kept

The double portion stayed good, and that carries its own lesson.

If they gathered it on any other day in self-will, it became worthless and corrupt. But when they gathered it in obedience, with the Sabbath in view, it stayed sound and good… There is perhaps another thought. Whatever we gain of Christ here becomes our eternal possession and delight. Gather as much manna as we can, two omers instead of one. If we keep it for the rest that remains, it will be a source of strength and joy throughout eternity.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

What the day exposed

God's answer reached far past one missed day.

They were so little able to value the high and holy privilege of keeping the LORD's Sabbath that on the seventh day some of them went out to gather, and they found none. Their neglect of the Sabbath proved their moral condition to be completely wrong — it proved them to be astray about all the commandments and laws of God. The Sabbath was the great test, the measure and gauge of the real state of their hearts toward the Lord.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

This failure runs deeper than one missed day.

Whether fallen man gets a privilege or a law, a blessing or a curse, it is all alike. His nature is bad. He can neither rest with God nor work for God. If God works and makes a rest for him, he will not keep it; and if God tells him to work, he will not do it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Given, not demanded. The double portion came before any command about the seventh day. God provided the rest first, so Israel received it as a privilege, not a duty.

- Read His actions. God made His mind plain by what He did: double manna on the sixth day, none on the seventh. His will was there to be read.

- Grace before law. Here the Sabbath is a gift in grace. Only later in this book does it appear as law, with a penalty attached.

- Bread before rest. God sets up the Sabbath only after the blood, the rescue and the manna. Rest for the heart comes through feeding on Christ, the Bread from heaven.

- The keeping test. Manna hoarded in self-will rotted. Manna stored in obedience stayed good. What we gather of Christ now keeps for the rest still to come.

Exodus 16:23 · Darby

And he said to them, This is what Jehovah has said To-morrow is the rest, the holy sabbath, of Jehovah bake what ye will bake, and cook what ye will cook; and lay up for yourselves all that remains over, to be kept for the morning.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Exodus 16:24 · Darby

And they laid it up for the morning, as Moses had commanded; and it did not stink, neither was there any worm in it.

A few days earlier, manna kept overnight had bred worms and stank. This time the same act left the food sound — because Moses' word told them to keep it, and a day of rest was waiting for it.

Obedience makes the difference

One writer sets the two outcomes side by side, and points to the motive behind the keeping.

If they gathered it that way on any other day in self-will, it became worthless and corrupt. But when they did it in obedience, looking ahead to the sabbath, it stayed sound and good.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The exception did not cancel the everyday rule. Hoarding went wrong in two ways.

They were not to store it up for the next day, as if a heavenly supply, like that of earth, would come to an end. Those who hoarded it found only worms and what stank, because of their disobedience. In the hoarding there was not only a misuse of the food, there was also a misunderstanding of what it was. It was not only sent fresh from heaven each day; it also reached man each day in its heavenly freshness. Christ is "the same yesterday and today and forever" (Heb. 13:8), and He is never to be brought down to the level of the ordinary supplies of earth; to do that is corruption.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Rest before the rule

God gave the double portion before He gave any law about the seventh day. That order changes what kind of day it was.

And now, along with the manna, the Sabbath appears. God provides for it in the double measure of the sixth day before He commands it: they rest not as a mere duty, but as a privilege.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Israel had done nothing to earn the extra bread, or the rest it made possible. One writer also notices how rare that rest was.

Here the people rested on the seventh day, and I am not aware of another single instance where the people rested on the Sabbath day... Just as God gave them twice as much as they could eat, so they rested on the seventh day. In the same way, by the gift of His beloved Son He has more than met our deepest need. So they rested by gift, not by command. And so in Christ we rest by grace, and not by works.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

Manna kept for the rest

Manna pictures Christ, and the sabbath pictures God's rest. So what they gathered on the sixth day was what they ate on the seventh.

What is taught here is that when we share in God's rest, in His grace, throughout eternity, Christ will still be our food. You might even say that our enjoyment of that rest will consist in feasting with God on the once humbled Christ... There is perhaps another thought. Whatever we gain of Christ here becomes our eternal possession and delight. Let us gather as much manna as we may, two omers instead of one. If we keep it for the rest that remains, it will be a source of strength and joy throughout eternity.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Rest that depends on Christ

That raises a question about the sabbath: has the rest it pictures already come?

The fulfilment of the Sabbath is not the "Lord's day" of the present period; it is still in the future (Heb. 4:9). "There remains therefore a keeping of Sabbath — sabbatismos — to the people of God." To keep Sabbath in that sense now would be to cut it off from Christ, which is to miss its whole connection. The same principle is true for the soul: it has rest with God only as it grasps Christ.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Manna that never spoiled again

This was not the last manna to escape corruption. Later in the same chapter God told Moses to keep a jar of it for good.

A small pot — an omer, the tenth part of an ephah — was to be filled with manna and laid up before the Lord. In due time Aaron laid it up before the Testimony. There it kept, without stinking or breeding worms, from generation to generation and from century to century.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Kept by word. The manna kept fresh because God told them to keep it. The same act in self-will had bred worms days before.

- Kept as gift. The double portion came before any command about the seventh day. Israel rested by gift, not by duty — as we rest in Christ by grace, not works.

- Kept fresh. The one exception never cancelled the daily rule. To hoard bread from heaven is to treat it as if it could run out.

- Kept for the rest. They ate during the sabbath what they gathered before it. Whatever we gain of Christ now becomes an eternal possession and joy.

- Kept forever. Aaron later laid up a jar of manna before the Lord, and it kept century after century — untouched by the rot that claimed the hoarders' portion.

Exodus 16:25 · Darby

And Moses said, Eat it to-day; for to-day is sabbath to Jehovah to-day ye shall not find it in the field.

Moses tells Israel to eat what is already in their hands, because on this day nothing will fall outside the camp. Here the bread from heaven and the rest of God meet for the first time. That raises a question every reader faces: on what basis does anyone enter God's rest?

Rest that starts with a gift already in hand

No one gathered food on this day. God had given it the day before, in double measure.

Just as God gave them twice as much as they could eat, so they rested on the seventh day. In the same way, by the gift of His beloved Son He has more than met our greatest need. So they rested by gift, not by command. And so in Christ we rest by grace, and not by works.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Commentators note how God Himself describes the day a few verses later.

Notice that the Sabbath comes here as a gift. "The LORD has given you the Sabbath." Later in this book it appears in the form of a law, with a curse and a judgment attached for disobedience. But whether fallen man gets a privilege or a law, a blessing or a curse, it comes to the same thing. His nature is bad. He can neither rest with God nor work for God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why the bread comes before the rest

The order in the chapter is deliberate. Bread from heaven is given first; only then is a day of rest named.

The manna, as we have seen, is a picture of Christ, and so the connection teaches that it is Christ, and Christ only, who can lead us into the rest of God. He is the only way. The apostle says, "We who have believed enter that rest" (Heb. 4:3) — that is, it belongs to those who believe in Christ to enter into rest. This does not mean, as some have taught, that the rest is a present thing. The context shows clearly that it is a future blessing.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The same order runs through the whole rescue from Egypt.

The lamb is killed and the Passover blood sprinkled. The Lord brings out His redeemed people. The song of redemption is sung. God gives the manna from heaven. Then, and not until then, He formally sets up the Sabbath.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

The first time this day appears

Writers also mark how late this day first appears.

This fixes the meaning of the sabbath, or the seventh day. Notice that it is the seventh and no other day. That shows clearly that it is God's rest… The sabbath is therefore a picture of God's rest. As given to man, it expresses the desire of God's heart that he should share His rest with Him. It is found here for the first time. There is not a trace of it through the whole patriarchal age, or during the stay of the children of Israel in Egypt.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

"You will not find it in the field"

Within the week some ignored that instruction and went out looking anyway.

They were so little able to appreciate the high and holy privilege of keeping the Lord's sabbath that "on the seventh day some of the people went out to gather, but they found none. And the LORD said to Moses, 'How long will you refuse to keep My commandments and My laws?'" Their neglect of the sabbath proved their moral condition to be all wrong — proved them to be astray about all the commandments and laws of God. The sabbath was the great test, the measure and gauge of the real state of their hearts toward the Lord.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The empty field carries a picture of its own.

The time for the manna will then be past forever. Christ will never again be known in that character, because the wilderness circumstances of His people will have passed away forever. The store they collected while in the desert may still be enjoyed, but there will be no more to gather.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Eating in the rest

Even inside God's rest, the food does not change.

What this teaches is that when we share in God's rest, in His grace, throughout eternity, Christ will still be our food. You might even say that our enjoyment of that rest will consist in feasting with God on the once humbled Christ… There is perhaps another thought: whatever we gain of Christ here becomes our eternal possession and delight. Gather as much manna as we can, two omers instead of one. If we keep it for the rest that remains, it will be a source of strength and joy throughout eternity.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Given, not gathered. God supplied the day's food in advance. Israel rested on a gift, "not by command," and believers rest in Christ "by grace, and not by works."

- Bread first, then rest. Redemption from Egypt and the manna come first. Only "then, and not until then," does God set up the Sabbath.

- God's own rest. The seventh day marks God's rest, and expresses "the desire of God's heart that he should share His rest with Him."

- No field to search. Those who went out anyway "found none," and their neglect became "the measure and gauge of the real state of their hearts."

- Eating still. In the rest there will be "no more to gather," but "Christ will still be our food," and what we gain of Him here "becomes our eternal possession and delight."

Exodus 16:26 · Darby

Six days shall ye gather it; but on the seventh day is sabbath on it there shall be none.

Israel gathered bread from heaven six days a week. On the seventh, none fell. Why does God hold back His supply on the day He calls His own? And what does that weekly pattern teach a rescued people?

The first sabbath in Scripture

This is the first place the Bible uses the word "sabbath." Its meaning comes from God's own rest at creation.

We read in Genesis 2 that "God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it God rested from all His work that He had done in creation." This fixes the meaning of the sabbath or the seventh day. Notice that it is the seventh day and no other. That shows it is God's rest. The sabbath is therefore a picture of God's rest, and as God gave it to man it expresses the desire of God's heart that he should share it with Him. It appears here for the first time. There is no trace of it in the age of Israel's forefathers, or during their stay in Egypt. But here it stands next to the manna, and that gives it a most blessed significance.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Redemption, then bread, then rest

The order matters. God did not offer this rest to slaves in Egypt, or before the bread from heaven came.

Christ's death is the only way to bring the sinner into the real rest of God. In the same way, if the sabbath were a shadow of God's rest in Christ, man could not enter the rest it pictures until the blood of that passover lamb was shed. That lamb pointed to the great sacrificial Lamb of God. So the lamb dies — the passover blood is sprinkled — the Lord brings out His redeemed people — they sing the song of redemption — the manna from heaven comes — and then, and not till then, God establishes the sabbath.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

Rest given, not demanded

This day arrives before Sinai and before any command attached to it.

Notice that Jehovah gave the sabbath of His own rest before the law, along with the eating of this bread from heaven. He first gave it to Israel as a privilege, not as a command, and not on the principle of law. Here, in the wilderness of Sin, it is God's gift to His redeemed people, in perfect grace.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

The double portion on the sixth day

Since none falls on the seventh day, the day before carries twice the supply.

If the people of Israel were to do no work at all on the sabbath, then a merciful and gracious Jehovah provided a double portion of manna on the sixth day. In its original nature it was not a mere ban, but a positive blessing.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

An empty field as a test

Some went out anyway. Finding nothing exposed more than a scheduling mistake.

Moses said, "Eat it today, for today is a Sabbath to the LORD; today you will not find it in the field." So little were they able to appreciate the high and holy privilege of keeping Jehovah's sabbath that "on the seventh day some of the people went out to gather, but they found none." Their neglect of the sabbath proved their moral condition to be all wrong. The sabbath was the great test, the measure and gauge of the real state of their hearts toward Jehovah.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Gathered with the rest in view

The way Israel gathered the manna decided whether it kept or spoiled.

If they collected it on any other day in self-will, it went rotten and useless. When they collected it in obedience, with the sabbath in view, it stayed sound and good. Whatever we gain of Christ here becomes our eternal possession and delight. Gather as much manna as we can, two measures instead of one. If we keep it for the rest that remains, it will be a source of strength and joy throughout eternity.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The rest itself still ahead

So what answers to the sabbath now?

The reality that answers to the sabbath is not the "Lord's day" of the present time; it is still in the future (Heb. 4:9). "So then, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God." To keep sabbath in that sense now would separate it from Christ, and that misses its whole connection. In spiritual terms the same principle holds: only as we grasp Christ does the soul have rest with God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why the field is empty

The seventh day has no manna in it, and that silence points forward too.

The time for the manna will then be for ever past. Christ will never again be known in that character, for the wilderness circumstances of His people will have passed away for ever. The store they gathered while in the desert may still be enjoyed, but there will be no more to gather.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Bread first. The lamb, the exodus, then the manna — and only then the sabbath. Rest follows rescue; it never comes first.

- Bread doubled. God supplies two portions on the sixth day. He pays for the rest He asks for: blessing, not a bare ban.

- Bread withheld. On the seventh day the field is empty by design; there is nothing to gather because there is nothing left to do.

- Bread tested. Those who went out anyway found none, and their walk on that day measured the true state of their hearts.

- Bread kept. What Israel gathered with the rest in view stayed sound — and what we take in of Christ now becomes joy in the rest still to come.

Exodus 16:27 · Darby

And it came to pass on the seventh day that there went out [some] from the people to gather [it], and they found none.

God had told Israel what to expect. Gather double on the sixth day, He said. Nothing would lie on the ground on the seventh. Yet some went out anyway. Their empty hands that morning say more about the human heart than about the manna.

A test they could not misread

God had not yet given a written commandment about the seventh day. He taught it by what He did. A double supply one morning, nothing the next — that left no one with an excuse.

Even before this, when He gave the manna, He had marked its importance in a clear and solemn way. God had made it so plain that His people had no excuse if they ignored it. Yet they broke it outright — though there was no command even then, we may notice. But if there is a true way of learning God's mind, it is by weighing what He does as well as what He says. And the God who had given Israel the manna gave them a double portion on the sixth day, but none on the seventh. Was this pointless? Was it not done on purpose, to guard against any work by His people — even gathering manna on the seventh day?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Rest handed over as a gift

Here the seventh day is not yet a rule with a penalty. God hands it to His people as a gift.

And note that the Sabbath is here presented as a matter of gift. "The Lord has given you the Sabbath." Further on in this book we find it given as a law, with a curse and a judgement attached if people disobey. But whether fallen man receives a privilege or a law, a blessing or a curse, it is all the same. His nature is bad. He can neither rest with God nor work for God. If God works and makes a rest for him, he will not keep it; and if God tells him to work, he will not do it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

No appetite for God's rest

Why walk out into a field God says is empty? Because sitting still felt like nothing, and Egypt still felt like something.

But sad to say, man has no heart for God's rest… God would have His people enjoying sweet repose with Himself. He would give them rest, food, and refreshment, even in the wilderness. But man's heart is not inclined to rest with God. The people could remember and talk about the time when they "sat by the meat pots" in Egypt. But they could not appreciate the blessedness of sitting in their tents.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Even daily bread yields to rest

Notice the order God set. The daily bread served the day of rest, not the other way round.

So God placed the "manna" — the heavenly food He supplied to meet His people's daily need — below the "rest" He appointed for them. That rest surpassed every other consideration. The Lord says, "The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath." (Mark 2:27)

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Grace does not cure the old nature

God had shown these people grace again and again. It changed nothing inside them.

Some of the people ignored the instruction and went out on the seventh day to gather manna. They found none (v. 27). Whatever displays of grace there were, man's heart remained the same. Disobedience belongs to his corrupt nature. It shows itself the same way under law and under grace. Through Moses the Lord rebuked what His people had done, though He bore with them in His patience and tender mercy.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why there was nothing to find

The empty ground has its own message. It is tied to what the manna stood for.

The manna prefigures Christ. So the connection teaches that it is Christ, and Christ only, who can lead us into the rest of God. He is the only way… The Sabbath is a picture of God's rest. Since sin came in, that rest is still future. So there is a clear lesson in there being no manna on the Sabbath. The time for the manna will then be for ever past. Christ will never again be known in that character. The wilderness conditions of His people will have passed away for ever. They may still enjoy the store they gathered in the desert, but there will be no more to gather.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Who makes the rest keepable

If sin is what spoils the rest, the cure cannot be harder effort. It has to come from God's side.

It is true that the Sabbath of rest set up for man bore no fruit for him. Sin, into which he had fallen, kept him from enjoying it… So, to give His people the enjoyment of the Sabbath they had forfeited, God must take their sanctification on Himself.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — the seventh day arrives here as something God hands over, before it is ever a law with a penalty.

- Gauged — a double portion on the sixth day, bare ground on the seventh. God showed His mind without a word of command, and left no one an excuse.

- Grasping — they could not sit still in the tent. Hearts that remembered Egypt's meat pots had no appetite for God's rest.

- Graded — God set His gift of rest above the daily bread He was sending. Looking for food that day meant chasing the lesser thing.

- Grace — disobedience showed itself under grace as much as under law. Only God can make that rest enjoyable, by taking their sanctification in hand.

Exodus 16:28 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, How long do ye refuse to keep my commandments and my laws?

God sent manna every morning. He told Israel to gather twice as much on the sixth day, because none would fall on the seventh. Some went out anyway and found nothing. The Lord's answer to Moses turns one small act into a question about the heart of a whole nation.

A gift before it was a law

God asks about "my commandments and my laws." Yet the rest He is speaking of came to Israel first as a gift, not as a rule.

And notice that the Sabbath is presented here as a matter of gift. "The Lord has given you the Sabbath." Further on in this book we will find it put in the form of a law. It carries a curse and a judgment for anyone who disobeys. But whether fallen man gets a privilege or a law, a blessing or a curse, it makes no difference. His nature is bad. He can neither rest with God nor work for God. If God works and makes a rest for him, he will not keep it; and if God tells him to work, he will not do it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The double portion on the sixth day made the point before any command enforced it.

And now, along with the manna, the Sabbath appears. The double measure of the sixth day provides for it before any command requires it: they rest not as mere duty, but as privilege.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

One small disobedience, a whole condition exposed

God does not only mention the seventh day. He asks about His commandments and laws — both in the plural. One act of gathering showed what the whole nation was like.

They were so little able to value the high and holy privilege of keeping the Lord's sabbath... Their neglect of the sabbath proved that their moral condition was all wrong — proved that they had gone astray from all the commandments and laws of God. The sabbath was the great test, the measure and gauge of the real state of their hearts toward the Lord.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why "how long" — a nature that has not changed

The words "How long" look back over more than one day. Israel had been fed by a miracle every morning, and it changed nothing in them.

The second thing is that some of the people went out on the seventh day to gather manna, despite the instruction they had received. They found none. Whatever the displays of grace, man's heart remained the same. Disobedience belongs to his corrupt nature, and shows itself in the same way, whether under law or grace.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Spoken to Moses, about the people

God speaks the rebuke to Moses, though the people were the ones who went out.

As God had told them, He gave no manna on the sabbath. The work of gathering was not to disturb God's day of rest. Even so, some of the people went out to gather (v. 27). God placed the blame for this on Moses, the representative of the people (v. 28). He stressed that the people were to keep the sabbath strictly by staying in their own places.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

What followed the refusal

God had given the day freely. After Israel treated it lightly, He guarded it with penalties.

But in Exodus 16 we find that some of the people dishonoured this day, which the Lord had guarded so closely. They ignored His word and went out as usual to gather manna. As a result, God wrote the keeping of the sabbath straight afterwards into the ten commandments of the law, and fenced it about with a curse on anyone who broke it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The rest they could not gather for themselves

Israel could not keep God's rest. The chapter sets the manna beside the sabbath, and that points to the one who can bring people into rest.

The manna, as we have seen, prefigures Christ, and so the connection teaches that it is Christ, and Christ only, who can lead us into the rest of God. He is the only way. The apostle therefore says, "We who have believed enter that rest" (Heb. 4:3).

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — God gave the rest to Israel as a gift long before He made it a law. The double portion on the sixth day provided for it in advance.

- Refused — Man will not take God's rest as a gift, and he cannot keep it as a law either. Under grace or under law, his nature is the same.

- Exposed — One small act of gathering measured everything. It showed the people astray from all God's commandments, not just one.

- Blamed — God spoke His rebuke to Moses, the people's representative, and told the people to keep the rest by staying where they were.

- Fulfilled — No one can gather this rest. The manna points to Christ, and He alone leads into the rest of God.

Exodus 16:29 · Darby

See, for Jehovah hath given you the sabbath; therefore he giveth you on the sixth day the bread for two days. Abide every man in his place let no man go from his place on the seventh day.

Israel is a few weeks out of Egypt. Every morning bread falls with the dew, and on the sixth day twice as much lies on the ground. This verse says why: the Lord has handed them a day of rest. Then it draws a line around that day.

A gift, given before the law

The word "sabbath" appears here for the first time in Scripture. It arrives in a desert called the wilderness of Sin, with no penalty attached to it.

Now it is worth special notice that God gave the Sabbath of Jehovah's rest before the law, in connection with the eating of this bread from heaven. It was first given to Israel as a privilege, not by command, or on the principle of law. And here the people rested on the seventh day... From Adam to Moses — yes, right up to this chapter, more than 2500 years — the Spirit never uses the word sabbath in any form. And here, in the wilderness of Sin, it is God's gift to His redeemed people, in perfect grace.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

The food comes first, then the day

Notice the order in the verse. God does not tell Israel to stop working and then leave them to find food. They already hold two days' bread before He names the seventh day.

God provides their rest before He requires it of them. So the food for the Sabbath comes before any mention of the Sabbath. They rest not merely as a duty, but as a privilege. And the Lord connects this rest with the reception or rejection of Himself in a striking way in the Gospels. The Son of Man was the Lord of the Sabbath. They could not reject the Son of Man and have a Sabbath at all.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Why the sabbath returns at this moment

Scripture says nothing about the sabbath from Eden until this chapter. The word returns once God has rescued a people and fed them from heaven.

Then sin came in, and God could no longer own the sabbath, and His word says nothing more about it. We read of the sabbath no more until God takes up His people in delivering mercy, and gives them manna from heaven. Then the sabbath day becomes a marked thing, and rest follows — a picture of Jesus sent down from above. God makes rest once more. He was giving to man in grace when He brought Israel out of Egypt, and the sabbath was the fitting sign of it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Two things stand behind the day: what God had done for them, and what they gathered each morning.

God gave Israel the Sabbath on the basis of redemption. They had the sabbath because they were redeemed. But they only rested on it, or enjoyed it, by gathering the heavenly manna — and this on the principle of pure grace.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

"Remain each of you in his place"

Moses told the people to stay in place after some went out looking for manna that was not there. Later generations turned that word into a measured rule about travel.

[A sabbath day's journey] is the greatest distance a Jew could travel on the Sabbath. The law gives no instruction about this. It goes back to the Sabbath when some of the people went out to gather manna, and Moses told them to stay in their place and not leave it on the seventh day. Ex. 16:29. In New Testament times people understood that a person might travel two thousand cubits (about five furlongs)... The Lord perhaps referred to this custom. He told the disciples to pray that, when judgement fell on Jerusalem, their flight would not be "on a Sabbath." Matt. 24:20.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A gift man would not take

Israel went out searching on the seventh day anyway. That failure says something about human nature, not just about one nation.

And note that the Sabbath is here presented as a matter of gift. "The Lord has given you the Sabbath." Later in this book we will find it put in the form of a law, with a curse and a judgement attached if anyone disobeys. But whether fallen man gets a privilege or a law, a blessing or a curse, it is all alike. His nature is bad. He can neither rest with, nor work for, God. If God works and makes a rest for him, he will not keep it; and if God tells him to work, he will not do it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The rest this day pointed to

The seventh day is God's own rest. So how does anyone enter it? The bread lying beside it gives the answer.

The manna, as we have seen, is a picture of Christ. So the connection teaches that it is Christ, and Christ only, who can lead us into the rest of God. He is the only way. The apostle says, "We who have believed enter that rest" (Heb. 4:3). That is, those who believe in Christ are the ones who enter rest. It does not mean, as some have taught, that the rest is something we already have. The context clearly shows that it is a future blessing.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Given, not demanded — the sabbath first appears here as a gift of grace, with no law, penalty or curse attached.

- Given in advance — the double portion falls on the sixth day. God supplies the rest before He asks for it, so they rest as a privilege, not only a duty.

- Given with the manna — rest returns to the story only after God rescues His people and feeds them from heaven. Redemption and bread come first.

- Given a boundary — "remain each of you in his place" fenced the day. Later custom turned it into a measured sabbath day's journey.

- Given, and refused — some went out looking anyway. Man can neither rest with God nor work for Him. The rest itself still waits, and Christ alone brings anyone into it.

Exodus 16:30 · Darby

And the people rested on the seventh day.

Exodus 16 closes its week of bread from heaven with one quiet line: the people sat still. Commentators call it a landmark: the first time Scripture records people keeping a rest God made for them, and they ask why it comes with the manna and not at Sinai.

A rest no one had kept before

One writer notes the long silence before this day, and how rare the day itself is:

Now note this carefully: God gave the Sabbath of the LORD's rest before the law, in connection with eating this bread from heaven. It was first given to Israel as a privilege, not by command, or on the principle of law. And here the people rested on the seventh day. I know of no other place where the people rested on the Sabbath day. From Adam to Moses, right up to this chapter — that is, for more than 2,500 years — the Spirit never uses the word "sabbath" in any form. Once they are under law, the Spirit never once repeats the words, "They rested on the Sabbath day."

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Another writer compares Israel with the nations around them:

After the fall of man came death and toil in a suffering world. From then until God gave the manna from heaven in the wilderness, His revelation makes no mention of sabbath. As a way of dividing time, the seven days were sacred in Chaldea. In Egypt the month had three sections of ten days. But a holy sabbath to the LORD was a new thing on the earth.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Given, not demanded

The Lord told Israel He had given them the sabbath. One writer weighs that word against what comes later in the same book:

And note that the Sabbath is here presented as a matter of gift. "The LORD has given you the Sabbath." Further on in this book we will find it given as a law, with a curse and a judgement attached if they disobey. But whether fallen man gets a privilege or a law, a blessing or a curse, it makes no difference. His nature is bad. He can neither rest with God nor work for God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One writer ties the gift back to redemption:

Do not forget that God expressly gave Israel the Sabbath on the ground of redemption. They had the sabbath because they were redeemed. But they only rested on it, or enjoyed it, by gathering the heavenly manna, and this on the principle of pure grace.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Rest built on the bread

Israel could rest on the seventh day only because a double portion fell on the sixth.

In the wilderness, in the ways of divine grace, the LORD set up the Sabbath in connection with the manna that came before it. God told Israel to gather a portion each day, but double on the sixth, laying up for the seventh. The Lord called that day "a day of solemn rest, a holy Sabbath to the LORD." This is no longer His creation and rest, but the gathering of manna, and rest. That surely points to the blessed Christ becoming the true Bread come down from heaven, who would establish rest for us also.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Rest ranked above the daily supply

For six days gathering was everything. On the seventh it stopped. One writer draws out the order of priority:

The manna was the heavenly food God supplied to meet His people's daily need. Yet He made it secondary to the rest He ordained for them, a rest that surpassed every other consideration. The Lord says, "The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What the seventh day exposed

Just before this verse, some of the people went out to gather on the seventh day and found nothing. One writer reads that failure as a test of the heart:

Their neglect of the sabbath proved that their moral condition was all wrong. It proved that they were astray as to all the commandments and laws of God. The sabbath was the great test, the true measure of their hearts toward the LORD.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Gathering enough to rest

One writer presses the lesson on the reader:

And God gave them enough for the sabbath, and so they rested. God has given you rest, my fellow believer. Do you not enjoy it? Do you not rest? Then you have not gathered enough manna. Read the word more. Think more on Christ.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Another writer reads the double measure saved for that day as something that outlasts the wilderness:

Gather as much manna as we can, two omers instead of one. If we keep it for the rest that remains, it will be a source of strength and joy throughout eternity.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — the sabbath arrives here as a gift in grace before the law, not as a command with penalties attached.

- Gathered — they could rest only because a double portion of bread from heaven fell the day before.

- Ranked — God set even the daily food below the rest, which outweighed every other consideration.

- Tested — those who went out to gather on the seventh day found nothing; their restlessness showed the true state of their hearts.

- Rested — the people who had gathered enough sat still, and whatever we store up for that rest becomes lasting joy.