And the whole assembly of the children of Israel murmured against Moses and against Aaron in the wilderness.
Israel is camped in the desert between the springs of Elim and the mountain of Sinai, and the food they carried out of Egypt has run out. The whole community turns on Moses and Aaron, and the surprise of the chapter is what God does with that complaint.
after_note: DELETE
Where they camped matters. Commentators read this stopping-place as a stage in Israel's story.
Here we find Israel in a very striking and important position. It is still the wilderness, of course, but this is a key stage of it: "between Elim and Sinai." Elim was the place where they had just tasted the refreshing springs of God's ministry. Sinai was the place where they stepped right off the ground of free and sovereign grace, and put themselves under a covenant of works... Here they are still under the same grace that had brought them up out of the land of Egypt, and so God meets all their murmurings at once with His own supplies.
Where our verse says the people grumbled, older translations say they murmured. That word keeps coming back through the whole journey.
The first word we must look at is "murmurings." It translates a Greek word said something like "gongusmos." You can almost hear the grumbling and muttering in the sound of it. The children of Israel murmured very often. It was one of their chief sins. They murmured at the Red Sea (Ex. 14:11)... They murmured at Marah (Ex. 15:24)... We find it again in Ex. 16:2 in the wilderness of Sin; and again in Ex. 17:3 at Rephidim.
Their words remember Egypt's food. They leave out the rest of what Egypt was.
They were taken up with their present distress. They thought only of the cooking pots of Egypt and the bread they ate until they were full. But what about the bitter slavery and the cruelty of their slave-drivers while they were held in the land of Egypt?
after_note: DELETE
The people aim their complaint at two men. Moses tells them where it really lands.
God had heard the murmurings of the children of Israel against Him. They may say they were complaining only against Moses and Aaron. But what were those two men except God's representatives? So Moses insists that their murmurings were not against Moses and Aaron, but against the Lord (v. 8).
What is missing from God's reply is as striking as what is in it. No punishment falls here. Commentators tie that to where Israel stands — still before Sinai.
We can see that God dealt with Israel in unmixed grace, whatever their murmurings might be, until they reached Sinai. He did it so that they might know how fully He was for them... In chapter 16, when they murmured for food, God gave them quails as well as manna, without a word of reproach. Israel was to know that God was feeding them on the ground of perfect grace. But later, when they murmured for meat again, they were under law by then. We read that while the meat was still in their mouths, the anger of the Lord burned against the people.
Grace went further than food. God answered the grumblers by showing them His glory.
In His grace God answered their murmuring by giving them meat and manna, and also by letting His glory appear (Ex. 16:2-10). God did not scold them for murmuring. He appeared in His glory to show His care for them in wonderful grace.
This is not just ancient history. One hardship can blot out a lifetime of kindness in us too.
When we have set out to walk in His ways, we are ready to murmur and rebel at the first sign of pressure or trial... We forget ten thousand mercies the moment one hardship comes... our path through the desert is scattered with countless mercies. Yet let one cloud the size of a man's hand appear on the horizon, and at once we forget the rich mercies of the past because of that single cloud — which, after all, may only break in blessings on our head.
- Place: They grumble "between Elim and Sinai" — past the springs, not yet under the covenant of works. They still stand wholly on grace.
- Pattern: You can almost hear the grumbling in the word itself. It returns at the Red Sea, at Marah, here, and at Rephidim — one of Israel's chief sins.
- Blindness: They remember Egypt's cooking pots. They forget Egypt's bitter slavery and cruel slave-drivers.
- Target: Moses and Aaron only stood in for God. The complaint went past them to the Lord.
- Answer: God sends bread with no rebuke and shows His glory. The same grumbling later, under law, brought judgment.
And the children of Israel said to them, Would that we had died by the hand of Jehovah in the land of Egypt, when we sat by the flesh-pots, when we ate bread to the full; for ye have brought us out into this wilderness, to kill this whole congregation with hunger!
One month out of Egypt, the food runs out, and the whole camp turns on Moses and Aaron with a wish that God had killed them back in Egypt. Their words show what the desert was there to expose: what a rescued people carry in their hearts when supplies run out.
The place and the date matter. The camp is in the wilderness of Sin, on the road between the springs of Elim and Mount Sinai. God has not yet given the law. This stretch of the journey is marked only by His kindness.
Up to Sinai, everything rested on what God was for them in His mercy and love. From that time on, by their own action, they changed the ground to what they were for God. That is the difference between grace and law, and that is what makes the journey between Elim and Sinai so interesting. But under grace or under law, the flesh stayed the same. It used every chance it got to show its corrupt and incurable character.
Their account of Egypt is true about the food and silent about everything else. The plagues and the slave labour have dropped out, leaving only the cooking pots.
It was easy to be glad to escape Egypt while God's terrifying judgements were falling on it one after another. At that moment the meat pots, the leeks, the onions and the garlic held little attraction. They came tied to the heavy plagues sent from the hand of an offended God. But now they have forgotten the plagues, and they remember only the meat pots.
Put as a plain question, the choice they are making is absurd:
Which was better — to toil at Pharaoh's brick-kilns, or to travel in the desert with God? Who could have any difficulty about that for a moment? They had forgotten their slavery. All they remembered was what they had eaten.
God's power had not changed; their view of it had. All they could see was an empty desert.
Sad to say, the people were walking by sight. The wonders of the Passover night and the crossing of the Red Sea had happened within the month, yet they had completely forgotten the power of their God. They remembered only the meat pots of Egypt, and they reproached Moses and Aaron. They saw nothing ahead but death, and they would have preferred it in Egypt rather than in the wilderness.
The people shouted at Moses and Aaron, but they were not the real target. The answer that came back was not what their words deserved.
When the children of Israel murmured against Moses and Aaron, it was against God they were complaining. But God in His grace answered their murmuring. He gave them flesh and manna, and He also let His glory appear (Ex. 16:2-10). God did not rebuke them for murmuring. He appeared in His glory to show His care for them in wonderful grace.
The same point is made about the gift itself: grace, not payback, is stamped on it.
The character of grace is stamped on this gift of the manna for the people's need. Their murmuring, instead of bringing down judgment, is met by the supply for their need.
God could have fed them from day one. The hunger was deliberate, and the ugly words it produced served a purpose.
It is a great mercy of God that He sometimes deprives us of food to such an extent that we become extremely hungry. He did this to Israel after He delivered that nation from the slavery of Egypt through the crossing of the Red Sea. He could easily have provided the food they needed from the start of their journey. Instead He allowed them to hunger — that is, to feel their lack enough to stir up serious concern within them. This concern reached the point of bitter complaint and murmuring, but in a certain sense this was good. Why? Because it brought out what was actually in their hearts.
Their charge was that Moses had brought them out to kill them with hunger. The hunger had the opposite aim.
The Lord has His purpose in letting us go hungry: to wean us from the meat pots of Egypt and to draw us to Himself... In their unbelief the children of Israel accused Moses of planning to kill them with hunger. But their hunger was meant to create another appetite in them, and only that appetite could sustain their true life.
The wish to have died in Egypt is not a small lapse of mood. Left alone, it darkens a person's whole reading of God.
The heart that stops keeping a thankful sense of God's goodness will soon become "dark." So Israel lost the sense of being in God's hands... This is the path a soul travels when it has lost touch with God. It first loses the sense of being in God's hands for good, and finally begins to think itself in His hands for evil.
- Hunger — God let them feel the lack on purpose, to bring out what was already in their hearts and to stir a new appetite for Himself.
- Memory — the empty stomach edited Egypt down to full meat pots, deleting the slavery that came with them.
- Sight — a month after the Red Sea they judged by what the eye could see, so they saw only death ahead.
- Grace — they aimed their murmuring past Moses at God, and God answered with bread, meat and His glory instead of judgment.
- Warning — an unthankful heart goes dark. It stops trusting God's hands for good and starts fearing them for harm.
Then said Jehovah to Moses, Behold, I will rain bread from heaven for you; and the people shall go out and gather the daily need on its day, that I may prove them, whether they will walk in my law, or not.
God answers a hungry, complaining people with bread out of the sky, not with punishment. In the same breath He calls that bread a test. Free giving and daily gathering stand side by side in this verse.
Israel had been murmuring, hungry and looking back to Egypt. God's answer is provision. One writer sets this beside a later scene, where a similar cry met a very different response:
The first thing to notice is the grace with which God meets the desires of the people. In Numbers 11 He also meets their desire in similar circumstances. But there "the anger of the LORD was kindled against the people, and the LORD struck down the people with a very great plague." Here there is no sign of judgment — only patient and forbearing grace. The difference springs from the dispensation. In Numbers they were under law, and God dealt with them on that ground. Here they are under grace, and so grace reigned despite their sin.
God also let the hunger come first, and answered only when they felt it:
When they were hungry enough to cry out for bread, God gave them bread. How true for us also! If He had first given them bread before they were hungry, they might well have complained that they wanted something different. The flesh in us always thinks it knows what we need better than God.
The words "that I may test them" hang on the gift itself, not on some separate ordeal:
Even God's grace in this way proves us. In fact, nothing proves us more than grace. The very name "manna" carries as much meaning in the picture as it did in the history. It reminds us how little even the people of God enter into what we have here. "They said to one another, 'manna' (what is it?), for they did not know what it was."
The test found something out about Israel:
Only a heart weaned from Egypt's influences could be satisfied with "bread from heaven," or enjoy it. In fact, we know that the people were not satisfied with it. They despised it, called it "light food," and craved meat. So they showed how little their hearts were free of Egypt, or willing to walk in God's law… It takes a heavenly taste to feed on bread from heaven. Nature cannot enjoy such food.
God had not yet given the law. That shapes how "walk in my law" reads here:
The people were not yet formally under the law, so the Lord at once stepped in with mercy. Yet by the bread from heaven there would be a first testing: would they walk in His law when He gave it, or would they not? This we see in verse 4.
The instruction is not simply "gather", but "gather a day's portion every day". God ruled out storing on purpose:
The manna was a daily provision for daily need. No one could hoard it; if anyone tried, it bred worms and stank. In the same way we cannot live on yesterday's enjoyment of Christ. We must enjoy Him today… Constant dependence upon God, constant drawing from Him, is what He appoints as the way of blessing for us. He would keep us with Himself. We must recognise the hand of God that supplies us, and gives us no store that would let us live, even a little, independently of Him.
The daily habit has an hour and a priority:
We must gather the heavenly manna fresh every morning. We must make Christ our primary object. We must seek Him "early," before "other things" have had time to take possession of our poor, easily-captured hearts.
Writers read the manna as a picture of Christ — food for people still travelling:
Manna was food for the wilderness, and presents to us Christ, a humbled Christ in this world. This uniquely attractive picture brings before us the matchless, heavenly grace that marked Him in His lowly path of pleasure for His God and Father. It shows His obedience, meekness, gentleness, dependence, His love of righteousness, His hatred of lawlessness, and every other feature of perfection.
Jesus pointed past Moses to the Giver:
The Lord Jesus said to the Jews, "Truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven" (John 6:32). What a beautiful answer to murmuring is God's tender action. Here were these people all murmuring, and the Lord steps in and "rains bread from heaven" for them.
- Grace first. Complaint deserved judgment; God answered with bread, because Israel stood under grace and not yet under law.
- Grace proves. The gift was the test — nothing exposes a heart more than kindness, and the manna revealed hearts still tied to Egypt.
- Grace is daily. A day's portion for a day, gathered fresh and early. Hoarded manna bred worms, and yesterday's enjoyment of Christ will not feed today.
- Grace humbles. God let them hunger before He fed them, so they would take what He chose rather than what the flesh demanded.
- Grace has a Person. The bread from heaven pictures Christ in His lowliness. He claimed the reality for Himself: the Father gives the true bread from heaven.