And it came to pass in the evening, that quails came up, and covered the camp; and in the morning the dew lay round the camp.
Israel had complained against God in the desert. His answer came as food, not punishment — and commentators read both the evening birds and the morning dew as pointing far beyond one meal.
God had every reason to rebuke them. Notice what He sent instead.
But grace, without judgment, answers their murmuring, and provides for their need. Jehovah heard them, but did not scold them. They cried for bread, and He rained it down from heaven. He gave them flesh every evening, and bread every morning.
Notice also how the bread reached them.
So divine grace ministers, and they are dependent entirely upon it. No human hands gave this bread. God Himself showers it around their tents in the night while they sleep.
The birds settled on the camp in the evening and met plain, physical hunger. One writer asks what that teaches.
Does it not tell us of the provision God makes for our bodily needs? After the work of the day the body needs refreshment... He who sent the quails is the same One who said, "Do not be anxious about tomorrow"... And just as the evening quails meet the body's needs, so the morning bread teaches us to begin each day with Him who alone sustains the soul... The quails are as much His gift as the bread; both are of His grace. The quails, since they only meet the body's needs, are not laid up before the Lord, but the manna, the bread from heaven, is.
The evening gift told Israel something about God. The morning gift showed them more.
We take our stand with the hungry people at the end of the anxious day. And look — "In the evening quail came up and covered the camp." Here was the flesh they wanted. Jehovah, their salvation, had not appointed Israel to perish! It was He who had brought them out from the land of Egypt, and this the quails showed to Israel. But there was more — in the morning they were to see the glory of Jehovah... It was God's glory in the wilderness — it was the gift of God.
The proportions of the text carry a message.
Only part of one verse deals with the miracle of the quails. All the rest of our chapter gives the details of the manna. That is because the manna is a picture fulfilled in Christ, the wilderness food of His saints. The Lord's own words in John 6 make this clear. The manna was the picture, but He is the "true bread from heaven."
The same writer looks at the flight itself, and at what happened when the miracle came again later, under the law:
The word of the Lord came true in an extraordinary flight of quails that evening. This bird migrates and is easy to catch, but the huge numbers settling on the camp made the event a miracle. Nothing more is said here about them. But when this miracle was repeated under the law, judgment followed, as we see in Numbers 11:31-34.
One writer sees the order as deliberate: flesh before bread, evening before morning.
A flight of quails comes before the manna, in the evening. It supplies the people with the flesh they had been promised. We know well what this death as the food of life means, so it raises no difficulty here. The Lord Himself, in His sermon on this text of manna (John 6), assures us that we must not only eat His flesh, but drink His blood, or we have no life in us. His person and His work are both necessary to us. And His sacrifice must come first. In the same way, Israel could eat the lamb only inside the house sprinkled with blood. So the quails come first, and in the evening.
Commentators differ on what the dew pictures. One connects it with the Holy Spirit:
But notice, it was in connection with the dew that the manna came. It is the Holy Spirit who makes Christ our food; and may there not be a fitness in the dew being withdrawn so that the manna may be seen? The Spirit always presents Christ and none but Him. But the same things that removed the dew also melted the manna. The sun of this world soon drives away, as far as our enjoyment goes, what should be our food.
Another reads the same dew as a picture of Scripture:
Water in Scripture is a figure of the word of God in its cleansing or purifying power. The Israelites got manna in connection with dew — we receive Christ through the word.
- Murmuring — Israel complained, and God did not punish them. Grace answered with supper and breakfast.
- Gift — No human hand brought it. God scattered it around their tents while they slept, so they lived on pure dependence.
- Evening — The quails proved that He who brought them out would feed them. God cares for plain bodily need.
- Morning — The evening gave proof. The morning gave glory: God's own gift in the wilderness.
- Christ — Half a verse for the quails, a chapter for the manna. Flesh first, then bread: His sacrifice, then His life as our daily food.
And when the dew that lay [round it] was gone up, behold, on the face of the wilderness there was [something] fine, granular, fine as hoar-frost, on the ground.
The people had grumbled for food, and God answered by covering the desert floor with something no one had ever seen before. This verse describes what Israel woke up to. Commentators read every detail — its smallness, its shape, its link with the dew — as a picture of Christ given for His people in the wilderness.
Older translations read "a small round thing, as small as the frost on the ground." Several writers below comment on that word "round."
The manna came after the people complained.
God stamped the character of grace on this gift of the manna, given to meet the people's need. Their grumbling should have brought down judgment. Instead, God met it by supplying this food.
What they saw had never been on earth before, and they had no name for it.
And when the dew lifted, a new thing appeared, one which had never been on earth before. "Manna?" — "What is this?" — the people exclaimed. It was God's glory in the wilderness — it was the gift of God.
Jesus took up the story of the manna and applied it to Himself.
This then is the meaning of the manna: the bread which God gave the Israelites to eat in the wilderness. It is therefore the proper wilderness food for the Lord's people. The Jews once said to our Lord, "Our fathers ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written, 'He gave them bread from heaven to eat.'" He replied: "Truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is he who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world." (John 6:32-33.) The manna, then, is clearly a type of Christ — a picture of Him as He was in this world. He came down from heaven, and He becomes the food of His people as they pass through the wilderness.
Two words describe how it looked: small, and round. Each says something about Jesus.
Second, it looked like "a small round thing," as small as the tiny specks of frost. The Son of God came down from heaven into manhood, so that He might give His flesh for the life of the world. In doing so He did indeed make Himself small and of no account in the eyes of men. It was also round, not angular and uneven. In the same way, in Christ once humbled here, there was an evenness that came from perfection in every detail.
Another writer reads the round shape differently: it shows how easy Christ was to reach.
The manna was round, picturing how accessible Christ is. A round thing is not like a square or an oval. Wherever you touch its edge, you are the same distance from its center. So the round shape shows how easy our Lord was to reach — young and old, rich and poor, religious and irreligious. Think of the woman who was a sinner, and Mary Magdalene, out of whom seven demons were cast. Think of the dying thief, and the children whom the disciples would have driven away. All alike could reach Him and be blessed.
It lay on the ground, and it looked like nothing special.
It is on the ground, so they must stoop to gather it. It lies on the face of the wilderness — something fine, as if pounded to pieces, fine as the frost on the ground. It does not look like much. It carries marks as if of rough handling. It reminds us of the prophet's words: "no beauty that we should desire Him." "What is it?" they say; for they did not know what it was. "The world knew Him not."
The manna lay where the dew had been.
The manna was found where the dew of heaven had fallen around the camp. The barren wilderness received the dew on its face. The moisture gathered unseen and fell from above. Where it settled on the ground, God spread the angels' food for man — "He gave them bread from heaven to eat." So we have both before us: the Spirit of God, who presents Christ to us, and Christ our food... We must gather our spiritual food diligently, day by day, early in the morning before the sun is up.
Older translations add the word "Behold" here. One writer turns it straight on the reader.
"Behold" — on the face of the wilderness at this very moment, despite all the bareness and roughness of your path. Behold, for you, God's own provision. Stoop, gather it up, and it will be sweet to your taste, and it will supply strength to you for all your desert way! Yes, weak as you are, surrounded by sorrow as you are, or, sadly, proud as you are, it is there waiting for you... not covered up, but out in the open... It is for every saint of God.
- Grace — Their grumbling should have brought judgment. God sent food instead, and stamped the gift with His own grace.
- Gift — What lay on the sand had never existed before. It was the gift of God, and it was God's glory in the wilderness.
- Small — Fine as frost, lying on the ground, with nothing about it to attract. Coming down into manhood, the Son of God made Himself of no account in men's eyes.
- Round — Even in every detail, and near at every point. The sinful woman, the dying thief and the children could all reach Him.
- Gather — It is not hidden but out in the open, waiting for every saint of God. Stoop early, take it daily, and it feeds the whole desert way.
And the children of Israel saw [it], and said one to another, What is it? for they did not know what it was. And Moses said to them, This is the bread which Jehovah has given you to eat.
Israel had grumbled for food in the desert, and the next morning something they had never seen lay on the ground. Their name for it was a question, and Moses answered by naming the Giver.
Israel saw the small round thing on the ground and had no name for it. Their name became a question. Early English versions kept that sense, and one writer shows what is lost when translators leave the Hebrew word as it stands.
"It is manna" (Ex. 16:15) has no meaning to a reader who does not know Hebrew, but translated as the earliest versions had it — "What is this?" — the passage is simple enough.
The name stuck because the puzzle never cleared up.
The people say to one another Man-hu? "What is it?" And the question remained as its name, for no one ever really found out what it was — nor ever will. But something we know: it is the sustenance and strength of the redeemed soul.
The bread arrived after the people had grumbled about food.
The mark of grace is on this gift of the manna, given to meet the people's need. Their murmurings did not bring down judgment. Instead, God met them with this food.
The people asked what it was; Moses told them who gave it. Commentators read that answer through Jesus' own use of the story in John's Gospel.
This, then, is the meaning of the manna: the bread which God gave the Israelites to eat in the wilderness. It is therefore the proper wilderness food for the Lord's people. The Jews said to our Lord, "Our fathers ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written, 'He gave them bread from heaven to eat.'" He replied, "Truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven." So the manna is plainly a type of Christ — Christ as He was in this world. He came down from heaven, and in that character He becomes the food of His people as they pass through the wilderness.
Nobody could tell what it was by looking at it. One writer hears an echo of how the world treated Christ Himself.
It lies upon the ground, so they must stoop to gather it — on the face of the wilderness — something fine, as if pounded to pieces, fine as the frost on the ground. This is how the people see it, who have not yet tasted it, and do not know what it is. It clearly does not look like much; it carries marks as if of rough handling. It reminds us of the prophet's words, "no beauty that we should desire him." "What is it?" they say; for they did not know what it was. "The world did not know Him."
Where the manna lay mattered: it rested on ground the dew had covered.
The barren wilderness received the dew on its face. The moisture gathered unseen and fell from above, and where it settled on the ground, God spread the angels' food for man — "He gave them bread from heaven to eat." So we have both before us: the Spirit of God, who presents Christ to us, and Christ our food. "The bread of God is he who comes down from heaven" (John 6:33), and we find Him, we may say, where the Holy Spirit presents Him to us.
What God gave could not be stockpiled.
The heavenly manna must be gathered fresh every morning. Yesterday's manna will not do for today, nor today's for tomorrow. We must feed on Christ every day, with fresh energy of the Spirit, or else we shall stop growing. What is more, we must make Christ our first object. We must seek Him "early," before "other things" have had time to take hold of our poor, easily-swayed hearts.
One writer sets the manna beside a second food, and says we need both.
You and I cannot feed on that manna unless we come to it through death. Manna, then, is Christ humbled, as He was in this scene. "The old grain of the land" is Christ glorified. You and I have to eat both, because we are in the wilderness and yet going to heaven. We are on our road home to God, and the Spirit of God carries our souls into heavenly places now. You must eat both.
- The question. "What is it?" was Israel's reaction, and it became the food's name. No one ever solved the mystery, yet this food is the strength of the redeemed soul.
- The giver. Moses did not define the substance; he named the Source. The answer to "what is it?" is "bread the Lord has given you."
- The Person. Jesus took up this story and pointed past Moses to His Father. The Father gives the true bread from heaven, so the manna pictures Christ come down and humbled.
- The daily habit. The manna could not be stored. Feed on Christ fresh each morning, before other things crowd in.
- The full table. Manna is Christ humbled for the desert; the grain of Canaan is Christ glorified. The traveller eats both.
This is the thing which Jehovah has commanded Gather of it every man according to what he can eat, an omer a poll, [according to] the number of your persons ye shall take every man for those that are in his tent.
The bread lies on the ground, and God attaches a rule to it: one set measure each, and every man gathers for his whole tent. Commentators read that rule as a picture of how a believer feeds on Christ, and of who else depends on it.
The manna is more than desert food. Commentators identify it with Christ Himself, in His lowly life on earth.
What, then, is the Manna for the believer? It is Christ come in human flesh — a humbled Christ… So Christ is the Manna in all that He was in the flesh. He is the Manna in the expression of what He was, both as the revealer of the Father and as the perfect man. His grace, compassion, sympathy, tenderness, and love; His meekness and lowliness of heart; His patience, forbearance, and long-suffering; His example — all these are found in the Manna. God has given us that Manna as our food for the journey through the wilderness.
The measure is fixed. Older translations read "an omer for every man," and one writer shows what that says about God's thought for each person.
In the giving of the manna, you remember, God said, "an omer for every man." Whether one gathered much or little, it was all measured. Each one had his full quota — "an omer for every man." A full Christ for every man was the thought of God… So the omer was the measure of Christ coming into this world. He came to meet the need of man, and in doing so to show the grace and glory of God.
The omer was an everyday household measure. So the gift came sized to the person, not to the crowd.
An omer was the measure people used in the tents of Israel for ordinary purposes. It held the usual portion of a man's daily food. So it made the gift of the manna personal to the need of every single person in the camp.
The verse ties each man's portion to what he can eat. One writer turns that into a test of the believer's desire.
First, they were to gather it every man according to his eating (vv. 16-18). As a result, he who gathered much had nothing left over, and he who gathered little had no lack. The appetite governed the amount collected. How strikingly true this is of the believer! We all have as much of Christ as we desire — no more, and no less. If our desires are large, if we open our mouth wide, He will fill it. We cannot desire too much, nor be disappointed when we desire. On the other hand, if we barely feel our need, we shall have only a little of Christ.
How does one fixed measure fit appetites that differ? Commentators give two explanations.
Some explain that although several in a family went out to gather the manna, when it was brought home and measured it came to just an omer for each of them. The more likely explanation is that an omer was the average portion for each. Some needed more and others less, so every one gathered "according to his eating," according to what he knew he would need. That way every one had enough, and nothing was wasted.
The bread lay free on the ground, yet nobody was fed without going out for it. One writer notes the effort and the posture it took.
Human responsibility went together with divine goodness. The heaven-sent provision lay around Israel's camp, yet each Israelite still had to be diligent to make that provision his own portion… To gather the manna, a man had to stoop, for it fell on the ground. Without question, the lowliest find for themselves the most of Christ.
The verse does not stop with the individual. It reaches the whole household.
But they must gather the manna "according to each one's need" (v. 16). This would take time, and would also mean bending down. First it says "an omer for each person." God would provide for each one individually. But it is also specifically said that each man should gather for all who were in his tent. The head of the household is responsible to share with his whole house the preciousness of the Lord Jesus.
The New Testament takes this scene out of the desert and applies it to money given for believers in need.
The earlier part of the passage comes up again in 2 Corinthians 8:15. It shows that when believers make a collection for poor fellow believers, this divine principle of "equality" should be worked out: what some have in abundance supplies the need of others.
- Given — the manna is Christ in His lowly life on earth, God's own provision for the journey.
- Measured — the omer is one fixed portion for each person: a full Christ for every man was God's thought.
- Gathered — the supply is equal, but the intake follows appetite; we have as much of Christ as we desire, no more and no less.
- Stooped for — the bread lay on the ground, so a man had to bend; the lowliest find the most of Christ.
- Shared — each man gathered for his whole tent; the same principle of equality later shapes giving among believers.
And the children of Israel did so, and gathered, some much, some little.
The manna has just fallen for the first time, and the whole camp goes out to gather it. The amounts differ from person to person — a detail commentators read as a picture of how believers feed on Christ, and as the seed of a rule Paul later applies to money.
The chapter opens with complaint, not faith. Heaven answers with bread:
Exodus 16 shows us Israel murmuring again, but the Lord answers with nothing but grace... Their absolute need was now plain. In the wilderness, who but God could supply bread for such a multitude? But He did supply it generously, and at their doors. "Whoever gathered much had nothing left over, and whoever gathered little had no lack. Each of them gathered as much as he could eat." ... It is Christ, the true manna from heaven, who gives eternal life and brings us into rest.
The bread lay all around the camp, but nobody ate it without going out for it. One writer puts God's giving and man's effort side by side:
But the manna had to be gathered. Human responsibility went together with God's goodness. The heaven-sent provision lay all around Israel's camp. Even so, each Israelite had to work at gathering it before it became his own portion... To gather the manna, a man had to stoop, because it fell on the ground. Beyond all argument, the lowliest find for themselves the most of Christ.
Why did some gather more and some less? The supply was not the limit — appetite was:
First, each man was to gather as much as he could eat (vv. 16-18)... The appetite governed the amount collected. How strikingly true this is of the believer! We all have as much of Christ as we desire — no more, and no less. If our desires are large, if we open our mouth wide, He will fill it. We cannot desire too much, nor be disappointed when we desire. On the other hand, if we are only feebly conscious of our need, only a little of Christ will be supplied.
Hours spent are not the same thing as hunger, and another writer keeps the two apart:
You cannot have too much of Christ... On the other hand, the amount we have does not depend on the time or effort we spend gathering. Not the amount of time, but the amount of heart, counts with God, and that is where the fruit is.
The verse notes the difference between the big gatherer and the small one, and blames neither. One writer keeps it that way:
When the children of Israel gathered the manna, some gathered more than others (v. 17). But there was no difficulty. The larger amount was not too much, and the smaller was not too little. Each had gathered just what he could eat. One may have a larger capacity to enjoy Christ, another a smaller capacity. Neither one carries any stigma.
Nobody ended up with too much, and nobody with too little. One writer credits that to God, not to the gatherers' skill:
God adjusted the supply to the demand with a wisdom and power that ruled out surplus just as much as shortage. He who gave the manna from heaven measured it exactly, whatever the differing measures in man's hands. And we have to do with the same God, and He surely regulates everything in the church with no less care and love.
Paul quotes this incident in his appeal for a collection, which pushes the meaning past the personal lesson about appetite:
Verse 15 quotes Exodus 16:18 in support of this. Reading Exodus, one might suppose the verse simply meant that each gatherer of the manna was able to judge his appetite rightly and gather accordingly. The way the verse is quoted here shows, however, that there is more in it than that, since it is cited in support of the principle of sharing with others what God may have entrusted to us.
Commentators differ on how the "no surplus, no lack" result came about — some report an older explanation that the measured amount turned out to be an omer each by miracle, while others hold that each person simply gathered what he knew he needed. Either way, the outcome is what Paul presses into service:
Some explained that when several from one family gathered and brought the manna home to measure, it came to just an omer each. The more likely explanation is that an omer was the average portion for each person, but some needed more and others less. So everyone gathered as much as he could eat — what he knew he would need. That way everyone had enough and nothing was wasted. The earlier part of this passage is quoted in 2 Corinthians 8:15. It shows that a collection for poor believers should carry out this divine principle of "equality" — the abundance of some meeting the need of others.
- Grace gives. The bread falls on a murmuring camp; the supply answers need, not merit.
- Grace is gathered. What God gives still has to be picked up, and it is the lowly who gather most.
- Grace fits appetite. The amount taken in follows desire and heart, not clock-time — and you cannot desire too much.
- Grace shames no one. Capacities differ; the large gatherer and the small one are both left without blame.
- Grace overflows outward. God measured so that none had too much and none too little. That becomes Paul's rule for sharing money with poorer believers.
And they measured with the omer then he that gathered much had nothing over, and he that gathered little wanted nothing they had gathered every man according to the measure of his eating.
Israel is in the desert, fed each morning by bread that appears on the ground, and each family gathers it with a measuring pot called an omer. When they measure what they gathered, the differences between them disappear — and centuries later the New Testament reaches back to this line to settle a question about money among Christians.
The verse turns on the omer, the measure used to check each portion. Commentators differ on how it worked out.
The Rabbis explain it this way. Several in a family went out to gather the manna. When they brought it home and measured it, it came to just an omer for each of them. A more likely explanation is this. An omer was the average portion for each person, but some needed more and others less. So each one gathered "as much as he could eat," what he knew he would need. Everyone had enough, and nothing went to waste. 2 Corinthians 8:15 quotes the first part of this passage. It shows that a collection for poor believers should carry out this divine principle of "equality," where the abundance of some supplies the need of others.
Either way, the outcome is God's arithmetic, not man's.
The One who gave the manna from heaven measured it exactly, whatever the differing measures in man's hands.
Three truths sit inside this one sentence: God's side, man's side, and the result.
These words hold three things. First, on God's part, He makes equal provision for each — an omer for every person. Second, on man's part, "each of them gathered as much as he could eat." The appetite governed the amount collected. Third, whatever the amount gathered, "whoever gathered much had nothing left over, and whoever gathered little had no lack." Both the large desire and the small one were satisfied by the amount each one obtained.
As a picture of the believer's food, the verse puts the limit in our desire, not in the supply.
We all have as much of Christ as we desire — no more, and no less. If our desires are large, if we open our mouth wide, He will fill it. We cannot desire too much, and we will never be disappointed when we desire. On the other hand, if we barely feel our need, we will receive only a little of Christ.
Hours spent do not set that appetite.
You cannot have too much of Christ… On the other hand, the amount we will have does not depend on the time or effort we spend gathering. Not the amount of time, but the amount of heart counts with God, and that is where fruit is found.
But what about the believer who takes in less than someone else?
One may have a larger capacity to enjoy Christ, another a smaller capacity, but no stigma is attached to either.
The difference between believers can look wide in daily life.
This principle holds true of soul-hunger. God's people have such different appetites for heavenly things! Some find half an hour over the Bible a long time; others meditate in it day and night. Yet though this is true of us, all the gathered manna measured out at an omer for every man. Every man had enough. Every man's need was fully met, for the measure was the satisfaction of every man.
The New Testament quotes this verse in an appeal for poor believers.
Reading Exodus, you might think the verse simply meant that each gatherer of the manna could judge his appetite and gather to match it. But the way the verse is quoted here shows there is more in it than that. It supports the principle of sharing with others what God may have entrusted to us.
The "equality" aimed at is not sameness of income.
This is not necessarily an equality in wealth or social position. It means that each one is equally delivered from need… The amount of manna gathered could differ a great deal from person to person. Some gathered much and some little. But all were alike in this: every need was met.
And God reaches that result through people, with a further purpose in it.
That was God's thought and desire for them all. But He does it through human hands, binding the hearts of His people to each other and drawing out their love. The gift, if it amounted to anything, was only the expression of that love.
- Measure — God set the omer, and He measured exactly what fell, however much ended up in each person's hands.
- Appetite — Hunger decided what each one took home. We have as much of Christ as we desire, and heart counts more than hours.
- Enough — Nobody had too much or too little. The large appetite and the small one were both satisfied, so a smaller capacity carries no shame.
- Sharing — The New Testament lifts this line into Christian giving: what God entrusts to one is meant to flow to another.
- Equality — The goal is not equal wealth. It is that every need is met — and God does it through His people's hands, binding their hearts together.
And Moses said to them, Let no man leave [any] of it until the morning.
God fed Israel in the desert with manna, the heavenly bread they gathered fresh each morning. Moses adds one rule to the gift: keep none of it overnight — a day's food for a day, and no store for tomorrow.
The rule set how often Israel had to come back to God. It sets the same rhythm for anyone feeding on Christ.
The manna could not be stored for future use. No one was to leave any of it until the morning; but some disobeyed this command, only to find that what they had left had become corrupt. No — the food collected today cannot sustain us tomorrow. We can feed on Christ only by a present exercise of soul. Much damage has come to souls from forgetting this principle. They have had a rich meal of manna, and they have tried to feed on it for days; but it has always ended in disappointment and loss instead of blessing. God only gives the portion of a day in its day, and no more.
The daily supply left no cupboard to fall back on. That was the point.
It was bread that showed them, morning by morning, that they had to depend on Him. Had He withheld the manna one day, they would have had nothing to eat; for they could not keep it till the next day — "it bred worms and stank." The Lord will not allow us to lay up anything in store — no, not even grace — that would tend to lead us into independence of Himself; it will turn to evil if we do. He showed His people constant grace in the way He dealt with them. But He never took them out of the condition of dependence on Himself, and He never will take us out of it.
There is another side to it. Daily bread meant daily proof of love.
It is impossible in grace to make provision for tomorrow, or to rest on the grace of yesterday. There is no resting place but God: absolute dependence on Himself is what God desires. God remembers Israel every morning for forty years (the sabbath was no real exception). The unbeliever may like to receive God's gifts; the believer loves the One who gives them. If God had only given the manna once a month, He would have shown His love only once, and not every day. God shows every moment how He loves us. If our eyes are not content with seeing the manna every morning, we despise the love of God. Are we happy to be completely dependent on God?
Nothing carried over to the next day. So the gathering had to come first, before anything else took the heart.
The heavenly manna must be gathered fresh every morning. Yesterday's manna will not do for today, nor today's for tomorrow. We must feed upon Christ every day, with fresh energy of the Spirit, or we shall stop growing. What is more, we must make Christ our primary object. We must seek Him "early," before "other things" have had time to take hold of our poor, easily captured hearts. Many of us, sadly, fail here. We give Christ a secondary place, and the result is that we are left weak and barren.
One writer applies the kept manna to Job. Job was taken up with what grace had produced in him.
He looks at the manna placed in his hand; he keeps some of it until the morning, and it breeds worms and stinks. (Ex. 16:19-20.) The flesh lays claim to the effects of grace, and Job's conscience and heart become less impressed with the abounding goodness and perfect holiness of God. Taken up with his own goodness, he loses sight of God's goodness in the same measure.
The ban belonged to the wilderness road. One writer points out where the same manna could be kept.
Although manna could not be kept even for one day's need in the wilderness, it could be kept for the land of Canaan. And so we shall find that while we cannot feed on yesterday's experience and make it satisfy today's need, it will be for rich blessing when reviewed with our blessed Lord above.
- Today. God gives a day's portion for that day, and no more. Yesterday's meal cannot carry you through today.
- Dependence. God lets us store nothing — not even grace — that would make us independent of Him.
- Love. Daily bread is daily proof of love. Manna once a month would have shown that love once a month.
- Freshness. Seek Christ early, before other things take the heart. Give Him second place and the soul goes weak and barren.
- Glory. Yesterday's manna spoils in the desert. Yet that same experience, reviewed with the Lord above, will be rich blessing.
But they did not hearken to Moses; and some men left of it until the morning; then worms bred in it and it stank. And Moses was wroth with them.
God had begun sending bread from heaven, with one rule attached: gather it fresh each morning and leave nothing over. Some kept a portion back, and by morning it was crawling with worms.
The manna was not a random desert food. Commentators read it as a picture of Christ, and they take that reading from the Lord Himself.
This then is the meaning of the manna: the bread which God gave the Israelites to eat in the wilderness. It is therefore the proper wilderness food for the Lord's people. The Jews said to our Lord, "Our fathers ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written, 'He gave them bread from heaven to eat.'" He replied, "Truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is he who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world." (John 6:32-33.) The manna, it is clear, is a picture of Christ — of Christ as He was in this world. He is the One who came down from heaven, and as such He becomes the food of His people while they pass through the wilderness.
The ban on storing it was deliberate. Those who kept a private reserve had misread the food in their hands.
In the way of appropriating this heaven-sent food, God set up a test. Each day the people were to learn afresh their dependence on God, who gives us our bread day by day. They were not to store up for tomorrow, as if a heavenly supply, like an earthly one, might run out. Those who hoarded it found only worms and a foul smell for their disobedience. In the hoarding there was not only a misuse of the food, there was also a misunderstanding of its character.
The failure was not laziness in gathering. It was the attempt to store up what God sends fresh, and writers apply that to believers who live on past experience.
If spiritual sloth fails to gather the manna, spiritual stinginess cannot keep it. There is no such thing as a hoard of spirituality. Daily we must feed on Christ. Yesterday's grace will not do for today. How this strikes at the root of "attainments in holiness." We practically have only as much of Christ as we enjoy at this present moment. We are never to look back on our past experiences with self-satisfaction: if we do, the corruption of spiritual pride soon shows itself.
Verse 20 is about manna the people had already gathered. Gathering it was not enough.
There were some who did not take the trouble to eat all they had gathered, and leaving it until the next day, it bred worms and stank. So it became worse than useless… We may apply this. What we gather of Christ from the Scriptures is for our food and enjoyment now. It is not something to store away and display to others. If we treat it that way it will only stink when we display it.
Rotting manna announces itself. Writers apply this to a life that carries Christ's name without feeding on Him.
The manna had to be eaten on the same day it was gathered, except on the sixth day, because of the seventh day of rest. Think of the unconverted person who claims to follow Christ. He speaks the words Christ spoke when He was here in lowliness and humility, but he does not take Christ into his being and life. He has no real hunger for the heavenly bread. He has never felt his need of the Saviour as a lost sinner. He answers to the manna kept overnight.
after_note: DELETE-none He is a Christian by profession. But he does not take hold of Christ as his life, so Christ in His grace and lowliness does not mark his own life. And so, as it was with Israel long ago, the name of the Lord that he professes becomes offensive to others.
There is one exception, and it keeps this from ending in loss.
In the wilderness, manna could not be kept even for one day's need. Yet it could be kept for the land of Canaan. So we cannot feed on yesterday's experience and make it satisfy today's need. But that experience will be rich blessing when we review it with our blessed Lord above.
- Gift. The manna pictures Christ come down from heaven — food God gives for the journey, not something the people produced.
- Test. Gathering fresh each day taught dependence; hoarding treated a heavenly supply as if it might run out.
- Decay. Kept overnight, the manna bred worms. Writers apply that to living on yesterday's enjoyment, which breeds spiritual pride.
- Display. What we gather of Christ is for eating now, not for storing up to show others; used that way it only turns foul.
- Keepsake. What could not be kept in the wilderness could be kept for Canaan — yesterday's experience is not lost, but reviewed one day with the Lord above.
And they gathered it every morning, every man as much as he could eat; and when the sun became hot, it melted.
In the wilderness, Israel ate a food that came fresh each morning and vanished by mid-morning. Commentators read this rhythm as a picture of how a believer feeds on Christ, and the timing, the measure and the melting each carry weight.
The bread lying on the ground pictures Christ — and one particular side of Him.
The manna, I need not say, is Christ, the bread of God from heaven, to be our food. It is Christ come down, Christ in all the circumstances of an earthly life, to sustain the life of His people... Here then we have, not a Christ in glory, but a Christ humbled — all that is in His blessed person to support and nourish us during our wilderness journey.
God sent the food, but no one ate without going out for it. Even the body's posture carried a lesson.
But the manna had to be gathered. God's goodness came with human responsibility. The heaven-sent food lay all around Israel's camp, but each Israelite still had to work hard to make it his own portion... In gathering the manna, man had to stoop, for it fell upon the ground; and, without contradiction, the lowliest find for themselves the most of Christ.
The gathering has a time and a place.
I must gather the manna, gather Christ, early in the day, to be properly fed for the day. I can only gather Christ out of Scripture, so that is what makes the reading of the Scripture, and the study of the Scripture, so important.
Appetite set each man's share. The same measure works on the soul.
The appetite governed the amount collected. How strikingly true this is of the believer! We all have as much of Christ as we desire — no more, and no less. If our desires are large, if we open our mouth wide, He will fill it. We cannot desire too much, and we will never be disappointed when we desire. On the other hand, if we are only faintly aware of our need, we will receive only a little of Christ.
The repeated "morning by morning" rules out a stockpile. Each day starts with an empty basket.
The manna was so pure and delicate that it could not bear contact with earth... So it is with the people of God now. The heavenly manna must be gathered fresh every morning. Yesterday's manna will not do for today, nor today's for tomorrow. We must feed upon Christ every day, with fresh energy of the Spirit, or else we shall cease to grow... Only Christ can nourish and sustain the new life in the believer: "As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever feeds on me, he also will live because of me." (John 6:57)
The melting sets a deadline. Writers read the heat as the day's own pressures.
But this heavenly food is most sensitive; it does not tarry after the sun has risen, when this world's attractions or cares absorb the mind. If Christ is to be the food of our souls, we need the "early rising" that Scripture speaks of again and again — the purpose of heart that overcomes our natural laziness... Where Christ's things are given the first place, there will always be food and sustenance for the soul. But when "the cares of the world and the deceitfulness of riches" come in, the heavenly manna melts away.
Turned into practice, this makes the first hour of a day a fair test of the whole.
It is a good thing to see the face of the Lord Jesus by faith before we see any other face. Time spent with Him gives us power before we start the day's duties... The way the first part of the morning engages us often tells the real state of our souls.
One writer sees the melting as a picture of something still ahead.
The manna disappeared when the sun grew hot: it melted. In the sanctuary and in the home they still stored it up. But no one saw it out in the open once the sun shone in full splendour over the earth... when our blessed Lord shines out as the Sun of righteousness and reigns in supreme splendour over the earth... there will no more be seen on the face of the wilderness the heavenly man in lowliness... Not that there is any change in our Lord Jesus Christ Himself. The surroundings and circumstances change, but not Jesus. They also stored the manna inside, out of public sight; and in that coming day of glory and rest, those who are within will have the high honour of sharing the "hidden manna" (Rev. 2:17).
- Given — the manna is Christ come down in lowliness, God's own provision lying ready on the wilderness floor.
- Gathered — heaven's gift still asks for your diligence; you find this food by stooping, and in Scripture.
- Measured — appetite set the amount then, and it sets your portion now: as much of Christ as you desire, no more and no less.
- Fresh — "morning by morning" forbids a stockpile; yesterday's supply will not carry today.
- Timed — the day's heat melts whatever you leave, so what takes first place in the morning shapes the rest.
And it came to pass on the sixth day, that they gathered twice as much bread, two omers for one; and all the princes of the assembly came and told Moses.
On the sixth day in the wilderness the manna came double, and the leaders of Israel brought the news to Moses. The extra bread announced the Sabbath — a rest God supplied before He ever commanded it.
The order of events matters.
God provides their rest before He commands it. He gives them the food for the Sabbath before He even mentions the Sabbath. They rest not merely as a duty, but as a privilege.
That silence is itself instructive. God had not yet issued a rule about the seventh day, but He had done something the people could read.
If there is a true way of learning God's mind, it is by weighing what He does as well as what He says. The God who had given Israel the manna gave them a double portion on the sixth day, but none on the seventh. Was this pointless? Was it not for the express purpose of guarding against any activity on His people's part, even gathering manna, on the seventh day? All the leaders came and told Moses that on the sixth day they gathered twice as much bread. Moses told them this was what the LORD had said: tomorrow is a day of solemn rest, a holy Sabbath to the LORD.
God later names the reason for the double portion.
Notice that the Sabbath comes here as a gift. "The LORD has given you the Sabbath." Further on in this book we will find it put in the form of a law, with a curse and a judgment attached if people disobey.
Where this gift falls in Israel's history matters.
Exodus 16:5, 22, 30 — given as a gift in grace to the people while they were under grace, before the law.
The Sabbath does not appear in Israel's story at random. Notice how much has to happen first.
The lamb is killed. The Passover blood is sprinkled. The Lord brings out His redeemed people. They sing the song of redemption. God gives the manna from heaven. And then, and not till then, He formally sets up the Sabbath.
The manna pictures Christ, and the day of rest is joined to it.
"Sabbath" means rest. If the connection here is a picture — and it surely must be — then it teaches this: we find rest for our hearts by taking and enjoying Christ as the Bread from heaven.
The double portion stayed good, and that carries its own lesson.
If they gathered it on any other day in self-will, it became worthless and corrupt. But when they gathered it in obedience, with the Sabbath in view, it stayed sound and good… There is perhaps another thought. Whatever we gain of Christ here becomes our eternal possession and delight. Gather as much manna as we can, two omers instead of one. If we keep it for the rest that remains, it will be a source of strength and joy throughout eternity.
God's answer reached far past one missed day.
They were so little able to value the high and holy privilege of keeping the LORD's Sabbath that on the seventh day some of them went out to gather, and they found none. Their neglect of the Sabbath proved their moral condition to be completely wrong — it proved them to be astray about all the commandments and laws of God. The Sabbath was the great test, the measure and gauge of the real state of their hearts toward the Lord.
This failure runs deeper than one missed day.
Whether fallen man gets a privilege or a law, a blessing or a curse, it is all alike. His nature is bad. He can neither rest with God nor work for God. If God works and makes a rest for him, he will not keep it; and if God tells him to work, he will not do it.
- Given, not demanded. The double portion came before any command about the seventh day. God provided the rest first, so Israel received it as a privilege, not a duty.
- Read His actions. God made His mind plain by what He did: double manna on the sixth day, none on the seventh. His will was there to be read.
- Grace before law. Here the Sabbath is a gift in grace. Only later in this book does it appear as law, with a penalty attached.
- Bread before rest. God sets up the Sabbath only after the blood, the rescue and the manna. Rest for the heart comes through feeding on Christ, the Bread from heaven.
- The keeping test. Manna hoarded in self-will rotted. Manna stored in obedience stayed good. What we gather of Christ now keeps for the rest still to come.
And he said to them, This is what Jehovah has said To-morrow is the rest, the holy sabbath, of Jehovah bake what ye will bake, and cook what ye will cook; and lay up for yourselves all that remains over, to be kept for the morning.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And they laid it up for the morning, as Moses had commanded; and it did not stink, neither was there any worm in it.
A few days earlier, manna kept overnight had bred worms and stank. This time the same act left the food sound — because Moses' word told them to keep it, and a day of rest was waiting for it.
One writer sets the two outcomes side by side, and points to the motive behind the keeping.
If they gathered it that way on any other day in self-will, it became worthless and corrupt. But when they did it in obedience, looking ahead to the sabbath, it stayed sound and good.
The exception did not cancel the everyday rule. Hoarding went wrong in two ways.
They were not to store it up for the next day, as if a heavenly supply, like that of earth, would come to an end. Those who hoarded it found only worms and what stank, because of their disobedience. In the hoarding there was not only a misuse of the food, there was also a misunderstanding of what it was. It was not only sent fresh from heaven each day; it also reached man each day in its heavenly freshness. Christ is "the same yesterday and today and forever" (Heb. 13:8), and He is never to be brought down to the level of the ordinary supplies of earth; to do that is corruption.
God gave the double portion before He gave any law about the seventh day. That order changes what kind of day it was.
And now, along with the manna, the Sabbath appears. God provides for it in the double measure of the sixth day before He commands it: they rest not as a mere duty, but as a privilege.
Israel had done nothing to earn the extra bread, or the rest it made possible. One writer also notices how rare that rest was.
Here the people rested on the seventh day, and I am not aware of another single instance where the people rested on the Sabbath day... Just as God gave them twice as much as they could eat, so they rested on the seventh day. In the same way, by the gift of His beloved Son He has more than met our deepest need. So they rested by gift, not by command. And so in Christ we rest by grace, and not by works.
Manna pictures Christ, and the sabbath pictures God's rest. So what they gathered on the sixth day was what they ate on the seventh.
What is taught here is that when we share in God's rest, in His grace, throughout eternity, Christ will still be our food. You might even say that our enjoyment of that rest will consist in feasting with God on the once humbled Christ... There is perhaps another thought. Whatever we gain of Christ here becomes our eternal possession and delight. Let us gather as much manna as we may, two omers instead of one. If we keep it for the rest that remains, it will be a source of strength and joy throughout eternity.
That raises a question about the sabbath: has the rest it pictures already come?
The fulfilment of the Sabbath is not the "Lord's day" of the present period; it is still in the future (Heb. 4:9). "There remains therefore a keeping of Sabbath — sabbatismos — to the people of God." To keep Sabbath in that sense now would be to cut it off from Christ, which is to miss its whole connection. The same principle is true for the soul: it has rest with God only as it grasps Christ.
This was not the last manna to escape corruption. Later in the same chapter God told Moses to keep a jar of it for good.
A small pot — an omer, the tenth part of an ephah — was to be filled with manna and laid up before the Lord. In due time Aaron laid it up before the Testimony. There it kept, without stinking or breeding worms, from generation to generation and from century to century.
- Kept by word. The manna kept fresh because God told them to keep it. The same act in self-will had bred worms days before.
- Kept as gift. The double portion came before any command about the seventh day. Israel rested by gift, not by duty — as we rest in Christ by grace, not works.
- Kept fresh. The one exception never cancelled the daily rule. To hoard bread from heaven is to treat it as if it could run out.
- Kept for the rest. They ate during the sabbath what they gathered before it. Whatever we gain of Christ now becomes an eternal possession and joy.
- Kept forever. Aaron later laid up a jar of manna before the Lord, and it kept century after century — untouched by the rot that claimed the hoarders' portion.
And Moses said, Eat it to-day; for to-day is sabbath to Jehovah to-day ye shall not find it in the field.
Moses tells Israel to eat what is already in their hands, because on this day nothing will fall outside the camp. Here the bread from heaven and the rest of God meet for the first time. That raises a question every reader faces: on what basis does anyone enter God's rest?
No one gathered food on this day. God had given it the day before, in double measure.
Just as God gave them twice as much as they could eat, so they rested on the seventh day. In the same way, by the gift of His beloved Son He has more than met our greatest need. So they rested by gift, not by command. And so in Christ we rest by grace, and not by works.
Commentators note how God Himself describes the day a few verses later.
Notice that the Sabbath comes here as a gift. "The LORD has given you the Sabbath." Later in this book it appears in the form of a law, with a curse and a judgment attached for disobedience. But whether fallen man gets a privilege or a law, a blessing or a curse, it comes to the same thing. His nature is bad. He can neither rest with God nor work for God.
The order in the chapter is deliberate. Bread from heaven is given first; only then is a day of rest named.
The manna, as we have seen, is a picture of Christ, and so the connection teaches that it is Christ, and Christ only, who can lead us into the rest of God. He is the only way. The apostle says, "We who have believed enter that rest" (Heb. 4:3) — that is, it belongs to those who believe in Christ to enter into rest. This does not mean, as some have taught, that the rest is a present thing. The context shows clearly that it is a future blessing.
The same order runs through the whole rescue from Egypt.
The lamb is killed and the Passover blood sprinkled. The Lord brings out His redeemed people. The song of redemption is sung. God gives the manna from heaven. Then, and not until then, He formally sets up the Sabbath.
Writers also mark how late this day first appears.
This fixes the meaning of the sabbath, or the seventh day. Notice that it is the seventh and no other day. That shows clearly that it is God's rest… The sabbath is therefore a picture of God's rest. As given to man, it expresses the desire of God's heart that he should share His rest with Him. It is found here for the first time. There is not a trace of it through the whole patriarchal age, or during the stay of the children of Israel in Egypt.
Within the week some ignored that instruction and went out looking anyway.
They were so little able to appreciate the high and holy privilege of keeping the Lord's sabbath that "on the seventh day some of the people went out to gather, but they found none. And the LORD said to Moses, 'How long will you refuse to keep My commandments and My laws?'" Their neglect of the sabbath proved their moral condition to be all wrong — proved them to be astray about all the commandments and laws of God. The sabbath was the great test, the measure and gauge of the real state of their hearts toward the Lord.
The empty field carries a picture of its own.
The time for the manna will then be past forever. Christ will never again be known in that character, because the wilderness circumstances of His people will have passed away forever. The store they collected while in the desert may still be enjoyed, but there will be no more to gather.
Even inside God's rest, the food does not change.
What this teaches is that when we share in God's rest, in His grace, throughout eternity, Christ will still be our food. You might even say that our enjoyment of that rest will consist in feasting with God on the once humbled Christ… There is perhaps another thought: whatever we gain of Christ here becomes our eternal possession and delight. Gather as much manna as we can, two omers instead of one. If we keep it for the rest that remains, it will be a source of strength and joy throughout eternity.
- Given, not gathered. God supplied the day's food in advance. Israel rested on a gift, "not by command," and believers rest in Christ "by grace, and not by works."
- Bread first, then rest. Redemption from Egypt and the manna come first. Only "then, and not until then," does God set up the Sabbath.
- God's own rest. The seventh day marks God's rest, and expresses "the desire of God's heart that he should share His rest with Him."
- No field to search. Those who went out anyway "found none," and their neglect became "the measure and gauge of the real state of their hearts."
- Eating still. In the rest there will be "no more to gather," but "Christ will still be our food," and what we gain of Him here "becomes our eternal possession and delight."
Six days shall ye gather it; but on the seventh day is sabbath on it there shall be none.
Israel gathered bread from heaven six days a week. On the seventh, none fell. Why does God hold back His supply on the day He calls His own? And what does that weekly pattern teach a rescued people?
This is the first place the Bible uses the word "sabbath." Its meaning comes from God's own rest at creation.
We read in Genesis 2 that "God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it God rested from all His work that He had done in creation." This fixes the meaning of the sabbath or the seventh day. Notice that it is the seventh day and no other. That shows it is God's rest. The sabbath is therefore a picture of God's rest, and as God gave it to man it expresses the desire of God's heart that he should share it with Him. It appears here for the first time. There is no trace of it in the age of Israel's forefathers, or during their stay in Egypt. But here it stands next to the manna, and that gives it a most blessed significance.
The order matters. God did not offer this rest to slaves in Egypt, or before the bread from heaven came.
Christ's death is the only way to bring the sinner into the real rest of God. In the same way, if the sabbath were a shadow of God's rest in Christ, man could not enter the rest it pictures until the blood of that passover lamb was shed. That lamb pointed to the great sacrificial Lamb of God. So the lamb dies — the passover blood is sprinkled — the Lord brings out His redeemed people — they sing the song of redemption — the manna from heaven comes — and then, and not till then, God establishes the sabbath.
This day arrives before Sinai and before any command attached to it.
Notice that Jehovah gave the sabbath of His own rest before the law, along with the eating of this bread from heaven. He first gave it to Israel as a privilege, not as a command, and not on the principle of law. Here, in the wilderness of Sin, it is God's gift to His redeemed people, in perfect grace.
Since none falls on the seventh day, the day before carries twice the supply.
If the people of Israel were to do no work at all on the sabbath, then a merciful and gracious Jehovah provided a double portion of manna on the sixth day. In its original nature it was not a mere ban, but a positive blessing.
Some went out anyway. Finding nothing exposed more than a scheduling mistake.
Moses said, "Eat it today, for today is a Sabbath to the LORD; today you will not find it in the field." So little were they able to appreciate the high and holy privilege of keeping Jehovah's sabbath that "on the seventh day some of the people went out to gather, but they found none." Their neglect of the sabbath proved their moral condition to be all wrong. The sabbath was the great test, the measure and gauge of the real state of their hearts toward Jehovah.
The way Israel gathered the manna decided whether it kept or spoiled.
If they collected it on any other day in self-will, it went rotten and useless. When they collected it in obedience, with the sabbath in view, it stayed sound and good. Whatever we gain of Christ here becomes our eternal possession and delight. Gather as much manna as we can, two measures instead of one. If we keep it for the rest that remains, it will be a source of strength and joy throughout eternity.
So what answers to the sabbath now?
The reality that answers to the sabbath is not the "Lord's day" of the present time; it is still in the future (Heb. 4:9). "So then, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God." To keep sabbath in that sense now would separate it from Christ, and that misses its whole connection. In spiritual terms the same principle holds: only as we grasp Christ does the soul have rest with God.
The seventh day has no manna in it, and that silence points forward too.
The time for the manna will then be for ever past. Christ will never again be known in that character, for the wilderness circumstances of His people will have passed away for ever. The store they gathered while in the desert may still be enjoyed, but there will be no more to gather.
- Bread first. The lamb, the exodus, then the manna — and only then the sabbath. Rest follows rescue; it never comes first.
- Bread doubled. God supplies two portions on the sixth day. He pays for the rest He asks for: blessing, not a bare ban.
- Bread withheld. On the seventh day the field is empty by design; there is nothing to gather because there is nothing left to do.
- Bread tested. Those who went out anyway found none, and their walk on that day measured the true state of their hearts.
- Bread kept. What Israel gathered with the rest in view stayed sound — and what we take in of Christ now becomes joy in the rest still to come.
And it came to pass on the seventh day that there went out [some] from the people to gather [it], and they found none.
God had told Israel what to expect. Gather double on the sixth day, He said. Nothing would lie on the ground on the seventh. Yet some went out anyway. Their empty hands that morning say more about the human heart than about the manna.
God had not yet given a written commandment about the seventh day. He taught it by what He did. A double supply one morning, nothing the next — that left no one with an excuse.
Even before this, when He gave the manna, He had marked its importance in a clear and solemn way. God had made it so plain that His people had no excuse if they ignored it. Yet they broke it outright — though there was no command even then, we may notice. But if there is a true way of learning God's mind, it is by weighing what He does as well as what He says. And the God who had given Israel the manna gave them a double portion on the sixth day, but none on the seventh. Was this pointless? Was it not done on purpose, to guard against any work by His people — even gathering manna on the seventh day?
Here the seventh day is not yet a rule with a penalty. God hands it to His people as a gift.
And note that the Sabbath is here presented as a matter of gift. "The Lord has given you the Sabbath." Further on in this book we find it given as a law, with a curse and a judgement attached if people disobey. But whether fallen man receives a privilege or a law, a blessing or a curse, it is all the same. His nature is bad. He can neither rest with God nor work for God. If God works and makes a rest for him, he will not keep it; and if God tells him to work, he will not do it.
Why walk out into a field God says is empty? Because sitting still felt like nothing, and Egypt still felt like something.
But sad to say, man has no heart for God's rest… God would have His people enjoying sweet repose with Himself. He would give them rest, food, and refreshment, even in the wilderness. But man's heart is not inclined to rest with God. The people could remember and talk about the time when they "sat by the meat pots" in Egypt. But they could not appreciate the blessedness of sitting in their tents.
Notice the order God set. The daily bread served the day of rest, not the other way round.
So God placed the "manna" — the heavenly food He supplied to meet His people's daily need — below the "rest" He appointed for them. That rest surpassed every other consideration. The Lord says, "The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath." (Mark 2:27)
God had shown these people grace again and again. It changed nothing inside them.
Some of the people ignored the instruction and went out on the seventh day to gather manna. They found none (v. 27). Whatever displays of grace there were, man's heart remained the same. Disobedience belongs to his corrupt nature. It shows itself the same way under law and under grace. Through Moses the Lord rebuked what His people had done, though He bore with them in His patience and tender mercy.
The empty ground has its own message. It is tied to what the manna stood for.
The manna prefigures Christ. So the connection teaches that it is Christ, and Christ only, who can lead us into the rest of God. He is the only way… The Sabbath is a picture of God's rest. Since sin came in, that rest is still future. So there is a clear lesson in there being no manna on the Sabbath. The time for the manna will then be for ever past. Christ will never again be known in that character. The wilderness conditions of His people will have passed away for ever. They may still enjoy the store they gathered in the desert, but there will be no more to gather.
If sin is what spoils the rest, the cure cannot be harder effort. It has to come from God's side.
It is true that the Sabbath of rest set up for man bore no fruit for him. Sin, into which he had fallen, kept him from enjoying it… So, to give His people the enjoyment of the Sabbath they had forfeited, God must take their sanctification on Himself.
- Given — the seventh day arrives here as something God hands over, before it is ever a law with a penalty.
- Gauged — a double portion on the sixth day, bare ground on the seventh. God showed His mind without a word of command, and left no one an excuse.
- Grasping — they could not sit still in the tent. Hearts that remembered Egypt's meat pots had no appetite for God's rest.
- Graded — God set His gift of rest above the daily bread He was sending. Looking for food that day meant chasing the lesser thing.
- Grace — disobedience showed itself under grace as much as under law. Only God can make that rest enjoyable, by taking their sanctification in hand.
And Jehovah said to Moses, How long do ye refuse to keep my commandments and my laws?
God sent manna every morning. He told Israel to gather twice as much on the sixth day, because none would fall on the seventh. Some went out anyway and found nothing. The Lord's answer to Moses turns one small act into a question about the heart of a whole nation.
God asks about "my commandments and my laws." Yet the rest He is speaking of came to Israel first as a gift, not as a rule.
And notice that the Sabbath is presented here as a matter of gift. "The Lord has given you the Sabbath." Further on in this book we will find it put in the form of a law. It carries a curse and a judgment for anyone who disobeys. But whether fallen man gets a privilege or a law, a blessing or a curse, it makes no difference. His nature is bad. He can neither rest with God nor work for God. If God works and makes a rest for him, he will not keep it; and if God tells him to work, he will not do it.
The double portion on the sixth day made the point before any command enforced it.
And now, along with the manna, the Sabbath appears. The double measure of the sixth day provides for it before any command requires it: they rest not as mere duty, but as privilege.
God does not only mention the seventh day. He asks about His commandments and laws — both in the plural. One act of gathering showed what the whole nation was like.
They were so little able to value the high and holy privilege of keeping the Lord's sabbath... Their neglect of the sabbath proved that their moral condition was all wrong — proved that they had gone astray from all the commandments and laws of God. The sabbath was the great test, the measure and gauge of the real state of their hearts toward the Lord.
The words "How long" look back over more than one day. Israel had been fed by a miracle every morning, and it changed nothing in them.
The second thing is that some of the people went out on the seventh day to gather manna, despite the instruction they had received. They found none. Whatever the displays of grace, man's heart remained the same. Disobedience belongs to his corrupt nature, and shows itself in the same way, whether under law or grace.
God speaks the rebuke to Moses, though the people were the ones who went out.
As God had told them, He gave no manna on the sabbath. The work of gathering was not to disturb God's day of rest. Even so, some of the people went out to gather (v. 27). God placed the blame for this on Moses, the representative of the people (v. 28). He stressed that the people were to keep the sabbath strictly by staying in their own places.
God had given the day freely. After Israel treated it lightly, He guarded it with penalties.
But in Exodus 16 we find that some of the people dishonoured this day, which the Lord had guarded so closely. They ignored His word and went out as usual to gather manna. As a result, God wrote the keeping of the sabbath straight afterwards into the ten commandments of the law, and fenced it about with a curse on anyone who broke it.
Israel could not keep God's rest. The chapter sets the manna beside the sabbath, and that points to the one who can bring people into rest.
The manna, as we have seen, prefigures Christ, and so the connection teaches that it is Christ, and Christ only, who can lead us into the rest of God. He is the only way. The apostle therefore says, "We who have believed enter that rest" (Heb. 4:3).
- Given — God gave the rest to Israel as a gift long before He made it a law. The double portion on the sixth day provided for it in advance.
- Refused — Man will not take God's rest as a gift, and he cannot keep it as a law either. Under grace or under law, his nature is the same.
- Exposed — One small act of gathering measured everything. It showed the people astray from all God's commandments, not just one.
- Blamed — God spoke His rebuke to Moses, the people's representative, and told the people to keep the rest by staying where they were.
- Fulfilled — No one can gather this rest. The manna points to Christ, and He alone leads into the rest of God.
See, for Jehovah hath given you the sabbath; therefore he giveth you on the sixth day the bread for two days. Abide every man in his place let no man go from his place on the seventh day.
Israel is a few weeks out of Egypt. Every morning bread falls with the dew, and on the sixth day twice as much lies on the ground. This verse says why: the Lord has handed them a day of rest. Then it draws a line around that day.
The word "sabbath" appears here for the first time in Scripture. It arrives in a desert called the wilderness of Sin, with no penalty attached to it.
Now it is worth special notice that God gave the Sabbath of Jehovah's rest before the law, in connection with the eating of this bread from heaven. It was first given to Israel as a privilege, not by command, or on the principle of law. And here the people rested on the seventh day... From Adam to Moses — yes, right up to this chapter, more than 2500 years — the Spirit never uses the word sabbath in any form. And here, in the wilderness of Sin, it is God's gift to His redeemed people, in perfect grace.
Notice the order in the verse. God does not tell Israel to stop working and then leave them to find food. They already hold two days' bread before He names the seventh day.
God provides their rest before He requires it of them. So the food for the Sabbath comes before any mention of the Sabbath. They rest not merely as a duty, but as a privilege. And the Lord connects this rest with the reception or rejection of Himself in a striking way in the Gospels. The Son of Man was the Lord of the Sabbath. They could not reject the Son of Man and have a Sabbath at all.
Scripture says nothing about the sabbath from Eden until this chapter. The word returns once God has rescued a people and fed them from heaven.
Then sin came in, and God could no longer own the sabbath, and His word says nothing more about it. We read of the sabbath no more until God takes up His people in delivering mercy, and gives them manna from heaven. Then the sabbath day becomes a marked thing, and rest follows — a picture of Jesus sent down from above. God makes rest once more. He was giving to man in grace when He brought Israel out of Egypt, and the sabbath was the fitting sign of it.
Two things stand behind the day: what God had done for them, and what they gathered each morning.
God gave Israel the Sabbath on the basis of redemption. They had the sabbath because they were redeemed. But they only rested on it, or enjoyed it, by gathering the heavenly manna — and this on the principle of pure grace.
Moses told the people to stay in place after some went out looking for manna that was not there. Later generations turned that word into a measured rule about travel.
[A sabbath day's journey] is the greatest distance a Jew could travel on the Sabbath. The law gives no instruction about this. It goes back to the Sabbath when some of the people went out to gather manna, and Moses told them to stay in their place and not leave it on the seventh day. Ex. 16:29. In New Testament times people understood that a person might travel two thousand cubits (about five furlongs)... The Lord perhaps referred to this custom. He told the disciples to pray that, when judgement fell on Jerusalem, their flight would not be "on a Sabbath." Matt. 24:20.
Israel went out searching on the seventh day anyway. That failure says something about human nature, not just about one nation.
And note that the Sabbath is here presented as a matter of gift. "The Lord has given you the Sabbath." Later in this book we will find it put in the form of a law, with a curse and a judgement attached if anyone disobeys. But whether fallen man gets a privilege or a law, a blessing or a curse, it is all alike. His nature is bad. He can neither rest with, nor work for, God. If God works and makes a rest for him, he will not keep it; and if God tells him to work, he will not do it.
The seventh day is God's own rest. So how does anyone enter it? The bread lying beside it gives the answer.
The manna, as we have seen, is a picture of Christ. So the connection teaches that it is Christ, and Christ only, who can lead us into the rest of God. He is the only way. The apostle says, "We who have believed enter that rest" (Heb. 4:3). That is, those who believe in Christ are the ones who enter rest. It does not mean, as some have taught, that the rest is something we already have. The context clearly shows that it is a future blessing.
- Given, not demanded — the sabbath first appears here as a gift of grace, with no law, penalty or curse attached.
- Given in advance — the double portion falls on the sixth day. God supplies the rest before He asks for it, so they rest as a privilege, not only a duty.
- Given with the manna — rest returns to the story only after God rescues His people and feeds them from heaven. Redemption and bread come first.
- Given a boundary — "remain each of you in his place" fenced the day. Later custom turned it into a measured sabbath day's journey.
- Given, and refused — some went out looking anyway. Man can neither rest with God nor work for Him. The rest itself still waits, and Christ alone brings anyone into it.
And the people rested on the seventh day.
Exodus 16 closes its week of bread from heaven with one quiet line: the people sat still. Commentators call it a landmark: the first time Scripture records people keeping a rest God made for them, and they ask why it comes with the manna and not at Sinai.
One writer notes the long silence before this day, and how rare the day itself is:
Now note this carefully: God gave the Sabbath of the LORD's rest before the law, in connection with eating this bread from heaven. It was first given to Israel as a privilege, not by command, or on the principle of law. And here the people rested on the seventh day. I know of no other place where the people rested on the Sabbath day. From Adam to Moses, right up to this chapter — that is, for more than 2,500 years — the Spirit never uses the word "sabbath" in any form. Once they are under law, the Spirit never once repeats the words, "They rested on the Sabbath day."
Another writer compares Israel with the nations around them:
After the fall of man came death and toil in a suffering world. From then until God gave the manna from heaven in the wilderness, His revelation makes no mention of sabbath. As a way of dividing time, the seven days were sacred in Chaldea. In Egypt the month had three sections of ten days. But a holy sabbath to the LORD was a new thing on the earth.
The Lord told Israel He had given them the sabbath. One writer weighs that word against what comes later in the same book:
And note that the Sabbath is here presented as a matter of gift. "The LORD has given you the Sabbath." Further on in this book we will find it given as a law, with a curse and a judgement attached if they disobey. But whether fallen man gets a privilege or a law, a blessing or a curse, it makes no difference. His nature is bad. He can neither rest with God nor work for God.
One writer ties the gift back to redemption:
Do not forget that God expressly gave Israel the Sabbath on the ground of redemption. They had the sabbath because they were redeemed. But they only rested on it, or enjoyed it, by gathering the heavenly manna, and this on the principle of pure grace.
Israel could rest on the seventh day only because a double portion fell on the sixth.
In the wilderness, in the ways of divine grace, the LORD set up the Sabbath in connection with the manna that came before it. God told Israel to gather a portion each day, but double on the sixth, laying up for the seventh. The Lord called that day "a day of solemn rest, a holy Sabbath to the LORD." This is no longer His creation and rest, but the gathering of manna, and rest. That surely points to the blessed Christ becoming the true Bread come down from heaven, who would establish rest for us also.
For six days gathering was everything. On the seventh it stopped. One writer draws out the order of priority:
The manna was the heavenly food God supplied to meet His people's daily need. Yet He made it secondary to the rest He ordained for them, a rest that surpassed every other consideration. The Lord says, "The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath."
Just before this verse, some of the people went out to gather on the seventh day and found nothing. One writer reads that failure as a test of the heart:
Their neglect of the sabbath proved that their moral condition was all wrong. It proved that they were astray as to all the commandments and laws of God. The sabbath was the great test, the true measure of their hearts toward the LORD.
One writer presses the lesson on the reader:
And God gave them enough for the sabbath, and so they rested. God has given you rest, my fellow believer. Do you not enjoy it? Do you not rest? Then you have not gathered enough manna. Read the word more. Think more on Christ.
Another writer reads the double measure saved for that day as something that outlasts the wilderness:
Gather as much manna as we can, two omers instead of one. If we keep it for the rest that remains, it will be a source of strength and joy throughout eternity.
- Given — the sabbath arrives here as a gift in grace before the law, not as a command with penalties attached.
- Gathered — they could rest only because a double portion of bread from heaven fell the day before.
- Ranked — God set even the daily food below the rest, which outweighed every other consideration.
- Tested — those who went out to gather on the seventh day found nothing; their restlessness showed the true state of their hearts.
- Rested — the people who had gathered enough sat still, and whatever we store up for that rest becomes lasting joy.
And the house of Israel called its name Manna; and it was like coriander-seed, white; and the taste of it was like cake with honey.
Israel names the bread God sent. Scripture then pauses to describe its look and its taste — and the name itself is a question nobody could answer.
The word Israel settled on was not a description but a puzzle. Their question became the name of the bread:
It is a picture of Christ (John 6), the divine Man come down to the earth, as the Gospels present Him. … The people say to one another, Man-hu? "What is it?" And the question remained as its name, for no one ever really found out what it was — nor ever will. But something we do know: it is the sustenance and strength of the redeemed soul. It is the Son of God come down in humiliation. It comes from heaven and rests on the earth. But the dew keeps it off the defiling ground — sanctified by the Spirit and the word. It is "small" — despised, overlooked, neglected; but "round," it keeps its heavenly and perfect character. It is "white" — pure, holy; and it is "sweet."
Two details carry the weight: colour and taste. One writer links the white to light, then marks off the honey:
It was white, the colour of the full ray of light, and "God is light." In Christ alone is this perfect reflection of God found. As to its taste, "it was like wafers made with honey." But it was not honey. No one was to mix honey into the grain offering, which again speaks to us of Christ as the food of His people. Honey pictures the sweetness of nature which will not stand the fire, and does not suit the Lord's offerings. The manna only resembled honey in its sweetness; the fire prepared it for the people's food. Just as in Christ there was all the sweetness of nature, but a nature unfallen, pure and incorruptible.
There is a limit to what natural sweetness can do:
Honey speaks of natural sweetness, which may refresh you for the moment, as in Jonathan's case, but which we cannot in any way live on. But the manna, the heavenly food, has a power in it that never grows stale; not mere natural sweetness, but something lasting. In Christ, the true fulfilment of the manna, our true food, we find all the sweetness of humanity, but raised to the divine. Such honey of spiritual sweetness awakens an appetite that should never fade.
The comparison is to coriander seed — and the choice of object matters:
Thirdly, as we see in verse 31, it was like a certain seed. Not a crystal, which though attractive is only lifeless matter, but a seed which has life. It was white in its purity, and in taste it had the sweetness of honey. It was not honey, though when made into wafers for eating it had the sweetness of honey. In all these things we can see a foreshadowing of the purity and sweetness found in the humbled Christ. Through His death He became the true seed of life for all His people.
Scripture reports the flavour, but a flavour has to be tasted to be known — and not everyone had the palate for it:
We are even told what the taste of the manna was. "The taste of it was like wafers made with honey." What is sweeter than honey? … There is something about the blessed Lord that surpasses everything else in the estimation of those who love Him. Nothing compares with communion with Himself. But, you see, the spiritual taste is needed. … The remarkable thing was that this small round thing held everything they needed for their whole life in the wilderness. And it seems to have sustained them well. They were always fit for a journey, or for fighting, or whatever came along. The manna was always enough. Is it not so with the Lord Jesus Christ?
Later in Israel's story the same bread is described differently, and the people end up despising it. One writer traces the slide and locates the change in the eaters, not the food:
In their wilderness journey the manna God gave His earthly people never changed in itself — but their appreciation of it sadly declined! … In Numbers 11 they said "there is nothing at all besides this manna." The manna in itself was no longer enough for them. They looked for something "besides" it, something extra. Their appreciation reaches its lowest point in Numbers 21 — "we loathe this worthless food."
- Named — Israel's own question, "What is it?", became the bread's name. No one ever found out what it was.
- Given — It comes down from heaven, rests on the dew rather than the soil, and is small, round, white and sweet.
- Pure — White is the colour of the full ray of light, and God is light. The taste is like honey, but it is not honey — and honey will not stand the fire.
- Living — A seed has life; a crystal is only lifeless matter. This is sweetness you can live on, and it wakes an appetite that should never fade.
- Tasted — Scripture records the flavour, but you need spiritual taste to find it. The same small bread was always enough — yet when appetite dies, people call it worthless.
And Moses said, This is the thing which Jehovah has commanded Fill an omer of it to be kept for your generations; that they may see the bread that I gave you to eat in the wilderness, when I brought you out of the land of Egypt.
Israel had just learned that manna kept overnight bred worms and went bad. Now God tells Moses to save an omer of it — one day's portion for one person — and keep it for ever. Why keep the one food that would not keep? And what were later generations meant to see in it?
The food that spoiled when stored for a second day is the food God ordered kept for the land ahead.
Manna could not be kept in the wilderness, even to meet the need of one more day. Yet it could be kept for the land of Canaan. So we will find that we cannot feed on yesterday's experience and make it meet today's need. But it will be a rich blessing when we look back over it with our Lord above.
The jar stood before the Lord, and it held one man's daily portion. What it recorded was not Israel's obedience but God's care for people who had feared starvation.
What a precious memorial of the faithfulness of God! He did not let them die of hunger, as their unbelieving, foolish hearts had expected. He rained bread from heaven for them. He fed them with angels' food. He watched over them as tenderly as a nurse. He put up with them and carried them on eagles' wings... So the pot of manna held one man's daily portion, and it lay before the Lord. It gives us a whole volume of truth. There was no worm in it and no rot. It was the record of the Lord's faithfulness in providing for those whom He had redeemed out of the hand of the enemy.
"Throughout your generations" points past the people standing there. The manna would stop. The memory of it would not.
The day was certain to come when the manna would stop falling and the wilderness journey would be over. But the Lord wanted the generations to come to understand the goodness of God, who had kept His people alive with bread from heaven.
The jar God chose was gold. Commentators read the manna as a picture of Christ's lowly life on earth, and the gold as the setting God gave that life.
It means that God will never forget, nor will He allow to be forgotten, that lowly life of Jesus here. It was a short life as men speak — thirty-three and a half years, not more. A short life, but the glory of it is going to fill eternity... God has taken the One whom men despised and hated. He has set Him at the very centre of His glory and crowned Him there with glory and honour. And yet, when God raised His beloved Son to that high place, He did not add any glory to Him. He was only setting what is glorious beyond measure in the only place fit to receive it... Infinite grace showed itself in that lowly life. Now, with Christ exalted and in His true setting, God invites us into His own presence to share His joy in what Christ was to Him when He was humbled here below.
Others press what the gold says about the One who stooped. The lowliness was real, and so was the glory inside it.
The golden pot seems to stress the divine glory of the One who humbled Himself here to be the food of His people. Even in that lowliness He was still "God over all." But God has set that lowliness inside the glory of deity. He has reversed, we may say, the form in which He appeared here.
Israel's descendants were only meant to look at the preserved omer. The promise in Revelation 2:17 goes further than looking.
There is surely a reference to this in the promise to the one who overcomes in the church at Pergamos: "To the one who conquers I will give some of the hidden manna" (Revelation 2:17). So Christ in His humiliation is never to be forgotten. He is always to be remembered, and His people will feed on Him with thanks throughout eternity.
- Kept. The one food that spoiled overnight is the one food God ordered kept. Today's supply cannot feed tomorrow. But the whole journey will be a joy to look back on at the end.
- Kept as a record. The jar held no worm and no rot. It stood before the Lord as proof that He had fed the very people who feared He would let them starve.
- Kept for children. The manna would one day stop falling. So God set His goodness where a generation that never tasted it could still see it.
- Kept in gold. Commentators read the manna as Christ's lowly life on earth. The golden pot is God treasuring that life, since the glory is the only setting fit to hold it.
- Kept to be eaten. Israel could only look at the jar of manna. The promise of the hidden manna goes further: His people feed on that remembered life for ever.
And Moses said to Aaron, Take a pot, and put in it an omer full of manna, and deposit it before Jehovah, to be kept for your generations.
God had been feeding Israel in the desert with manna, and now one jar of it is set aside and never eaten. Why keep a sample of food that would not last a single night, and what were Israel — and what are we — meant to see in it?
The jar was not for eating. It was a record. One writer reads it as God's answer to Israel's fear that He would let them starve.
Most precious memorial of the faithfulness of God! He did not allow them to die of hunger, as their foolish hearts had unbelievingly expected. He rained bread from heaven for them. He fed them with angels' food. He watched over them with all the tenderness of a nurse. He bore with them and carried them on eagles' wings... The pot of manna, then, containing as it did a man's daily portion, and laid up before the Lord, gives us a volume of truth. There was no worm in it, and no taint. It was the record of the Lord's faithfulness in providing for those whom He had redeemed out of the hand of the enemy.
The jar held one omer — no more. One writer finds the whole point of the memorial in that small measure.
An omer was the measure commonly used in the tents of Israel for ordinary purposes, and it held the usual portion of a man's daily food. So it made the gift of the manna personal to the need of every single person in the host. The application is plain. God fed each of His redeemed people on earth, and the memory of that bread will never pass from their memories — not in all eternity.
Commentators read the manna as a picture of Christ's life on earth. So the jar that held it points to where He is now.
We also read of "the golden urn holding the manna" (Hebrews 9:4). This is Christ again, the eternal memento in glory of that divine vessel which held a perfect, humbled, human life on earth. The Jesus who was down here is the Jesus who is up there. And the Holy Spirit would have you fix your eye on Him — the Jesus who walked down here and said, "Follow me."
Exodus says only "a jar." Hebrews adds that it was gold (Hebrews 9:4). Writers take the metal itself as part of the message.
The golden urn holding the manna went into the ark, an ark of acacia wood overlaid with gold, speaking of the Deity and Humanity of Christ. In the same way, the manna pictures the marvellous grace shown in His Humanity, come down from heaven. That manna lay before God in a golden vessel, and that golden vessel pictured His Deity.
"Before the Lord" came to mean inside the ark, out of Israel's sight. One writer weighs how long the jar stayed there unseen.
As a memorial of God's grace to His people, a jar full of manna was laid up before the Lord (Exodus 16:33), a "golden urn," as Paul tells us (Hebrews 9:4). For about 500 years this "hidden manna" told its story of Christ in humiliation, but to God alone. Hidden in the ark, the most sacred of the vessels, it stayed out of the people's sight. Probably no human eye saw it in all those five centuries.
Manna would not keep overnight, yet this portion lasted for centuries. One writer turns that contrast on our own experience.
It is truly remarkable. The manna would not keep for one day's need in the wilderness, yet it kept for the land of Canaan. So we are assured of this. We cannot feed on yesterday's experience as though it met and satisfied today's need. Yet that experience will bring rich and eternal blessing when we review it with our blessed Lord, as we enjoy the rest of the Father's house.
Another writer takes the promise in Revelation 2:17 as the sequel. He presses the difference between Israel's part and ours.
So the food of the wilderness stayed, but stayed only as a memorial, to be seen. To the overcomer at Pergamum, on the other hand, the promise is: "I will give him of the hidden manna" (Revelation 2:17) — he will share in it, not simply see it. The Christ we enjoy in the wilderness we will enjoy afresh in the glorious land we are going to. It will surely be more perfect there, for everything will be perfect there. And yet — mark it well — it is the very wilderness food itself.
- Kept — the jar was a memorial: God's own record that He fed His redeemed people instead of letting them starve.
- Measured — an omer was one person's daily food, so the memorial spoke to each Israelite, not just to the nation.
- Golden — Hebrews adds that the jar was gold. Writers see Christ's Humanity in the manna and His Deity in the gold that held it.
- Hidden — inside the ark, unseen by Israel for centuries, it told its story of Christ humbled to God alone.
- Shared — what would not keep for a day kept for Canaan. Christ promises the overcomer a share in that store, not just a view of it.
As Jehovah had commanded Moses, so Aaron deposited it before the Testimony, to be kept.
Aaron puts the jar of manna away in the sanctuary, just as God had said. It is the one portion of bread from heaven that no one ever ate. Manna gathered for tomorrow rotted, yet this jar was to last for generations.
Israel would one day settle in a rich land, far from the desert. The jar stood there as proof that God had not let them starve, though their unbelief had expected it.
Israel were never to forget, in the middle of the milk and honey of Canaan, what had sustained them during their forty years in the wilderness... What a precious memorial of the faithfulness of God! He did not let them die of hunger, as their foolish hearts had unbelievingly expected. He rained bread from heaven for them, fed them with angels' food, watched over them with all the tenderness of a nurse... The pot of manna, then, holding a man's daily portion and laid up before the Lord, gives us a volume of truth. There was no worm in it and no taint. It was the record of the Lord's faithfulness in providing for those He had redeemed out of the hand of the enemy.
The same food that bred worms overnight lasted for centuries once Aaron placed it before the Lord. That difference carries a lesson for how we feed on Christ now, and how we will look back on it later.
It is remarkable that the manna would not keep for one day's need in the wilderness, yet it kept for the land of Canaan. And so this assures us of two things. We cannot feed on yesterday's experience to meet and satisfy today's need. Yet it will be a rich and eternal blessing when we review it with our blessed Lord, as we enjoy the rest of the Father's house.
Hebrews 9:4 places the golden jar with the ark. But does "before the Testimony" mean inside the ark, or beside it? One writer weighs what the words can and cannot prove.
Reading Exodus 16:34 and Numbers 17:10, we might not have gathered that the pot and the rod were in the ark. Still, we cannot say those passages rule it out... The golden pot and the rod never entered the Temple. When the ark reached its final resting place, Scripture tells us plainly that there was nothing in it except the two tables of the Testimony. That remark, however, seems to point back to a time when other things had been in it too. And the words of Exodus 16 and Numbers 17, "before the Testimony," may mean they were put where the tables were kept. That is all we can say. Had it been written "before the ark of the Testimony," we should have known they were never inside it.
Hebrews adds a detail Exodus leaves out: the jar was gold. One writer sets that gold beside the wood and gold of the ark itself.
Here is one of them — "the golden pot that had manna" (Hebrews 9:4). The ark held it: acacia wood overlaid with gold, speaking of the Deity and Humanity of Christ. In the same way, the manna pictures the marvellous grace shown in His Humanity, come down from heaven. It was laid up before God in a golden vessel, and that gold pictured His Deity.
Israel later grew tired of the manna and complained about it. Yet God had told them to store a portion of it in His own dwelling.
But God said of what they despised, "Take a jar, and put an omer of manna in it, and place it before the LORD to be kept throughout your generations. As the LORD commanded Moses, so Aaron placed it before the testimony to be kept." It was as though God said, "That manna is precious to Me. The people may despise it, but it will be preserved in My dwelling place forever."
So what became of the jar once Israel settled in the land?
For about 500 years this "hidden manna" told its tale of Christ in humiliation, but to God alone. Hidden in the ark, the most sacred of vessels, it was out of the people's sight. Probably no human eye ever saw it in all that time.
What was withheld from Israel's eyes is promised to the one who overcomes at Pergamum, who is given the hidden manna to eat.
So Christ in His humiliation is never to be forgotten, but always to be remembered, and gratefully fed upon throughout eternity by His people.
- Commanded — God asked for one day's portion to be set aside, and Aaron obeyed to the letter.
- Kept — food that spoiled in a day lasted for generations before the Lord. Today's need still calls for today's supply.
- Golden — Hebrews tells us the jar was gold. The manna pictures Christ's Humanity, the gold His Deity.
- Treasured — the people came to loathe this bread. God kept it in His dwelling as precious to Himself.
- Hidden — unseen for centuries in the ark, it becomes the overcomer's promised food, enjoyed forever.
And the children of Israel ate the manna forty years, until they came into an inhabited land they ate the manna until they came to the borders of the land of Canaan.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.