Exodus 10:1–20

Exodus 10:1 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Go in unto Pharaoh; for I have hardened his heart, and the heart of his bondmen, that I might do these my signs in their midst,

Exodus 10 opens with God sending Moses back into Pharaoh's palace. The reason He gives is startling: the king's stubbornness is part of God's own plan. So two questions follow. Is God to blame for Pharaoh's refusal? And why would God want a refusal that costs Egypt so much?

What the hardening means

Exodus uses two different Hebrew words for hardening. The order they come in settles much of the difficulty.

"And I will harden Pharaoh's heart." God had already said this in chapter 4:21. Eighteen times we read of the hardening of Pharaoh's heart. But the Hebrew uses different words here, and they mark an important distinction. One means to "make firm" or "strong." The other means "to make stubborn." These two words mark Pharaoh's hardening of his own heart, and God's hardening after Pharaoh kept on in his wicked way. Scripture says five times that Pharaoh hardened his heart. Only then did God begin His hardening and make Pharaoh's heart stubborn. Pharaoh hardened himself, then God hardened him. Pharaoh had his opportunities. As he refused and stayed in unbelief, God made him stubborn. God never hardens first, and He never forces anyone to be an unbeliever. There is a solemn warning here. Thousands harden their hearts now.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Who moved first

By the time God says "I have hardened his heart," Pharaoh has a long record behind him. Commentators count the hardenings differently, but they agree on the order. You can check it chapter by chapter.

It is true that God hardened Pharaoh's heart. But He did so only after Pharaoh had shown extreme and unbelievable arrogance by saying, "Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice…?" (Ex. 5:2). And only after Pharaoh had hardened his own heart again and again. In fact, the Spirit uses two different words in the original language, and states no less than seven times that Pharaoh hardened his heart (Ex. 7:13, 14, 22; 8:15, 19, 32; 9:7) before saying that God hardened the heart of Pharaoh (Ex. 9:12).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

God gives men up; He does not make them bad

The hardening is a judgment, not a manufacture of evil. Writers press this point because the same principle runs through the rest of Scripture.

God never made any man bad. But He may, and in some cases does, give people up to the results of their own folly and evil. That is, He hardens in judgment those who make light of His grace and reject it… Pharaoh was wicked, and he grew more wicked the more patience God showed him. In the end the One he had despised blinded him in judgment and made him an example. All are responsible. Sin destroys the ability to obey God, not the responsibility to obey Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The refusal becomes a stage for God's signs

God tells Moses to walk back in precisely because Pharaoh will say no again. The stubbornness does not frustrate God's purpose; it serves it.

Pharaoh could not brush God's command aside by refusing to obey for ever. A creature resisting its Creator! Human will overcoming the Divine will! That could not be… Egypt's stubbornness would only display the glory of God more fully.

after_note: DELETE

C E Stuart

A story built for the grandchildren

The stated aim reaches past the palace to Israel's family table. The signs were meant to be watched, then retold.

Again the Lord reminds Moses that He Himself had hardened Pharaoh's heart and the hearts of his servants. He did this so that He might show His signs before them in public. He did it too so that His great works of power might have a very real effect on Israel's own generation and on the generations to come. Then they would realize that it was indeed the living Lord of glory who was dealing with them.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The verdict outsiders reached

The story travelled, and not only among Israelites. Centuries later the Philistines' own priests pointed back to Pharaoh. Their verdict: the fault was his.

The Philistines give us another striking witness against Pharaoh. The ark of God was with them, and they wanted rid of it… So they send for the priests and diviners. These men tell the people to "give glory to the God of Israel… Why then do you harden your hearts, as the Egyptians and Pharaoh hardened their hearts? When He had worked wonders among them, did they not let the people go, and they departed?" Here is a witness three hundred and fifty years later to the fact of the Exodus. It is also an admission from the priests of a foreign nation that Pharaoh had acted wrongly. Israel's natural enemies drew the conclusion… that the king met a just judgment, since he had hardened his heart against the God of Israel.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal first. Again and again Pharaoh hardens his own heart. Only after that does Scripture say God hardened it. The order of the record answers the objection.

- Hardening second. Two Hebrew words mark the difference. The king "makes firm" his own heart. God then "makes stubborn" the man who keeps refusing.

- Signs third. God sends Moses back in knowing the answer will be no. The refusal opens the way for God to show more signs in public.

- Story fourth. The purpose runs down the generations. Israel's children and grandchildren would hear what God did in Egypt, and would know the living Lord was dealing with them.

- Verdict last. The account travelled so far that even Israel's enemies drew the same conclusion. Pharaoh hardened his heart, and his judgment was just.

Exodus 10:2 · Darby

and that thou mightest tell in the ears of thy son and thy son's son what I have wrought in Egypt, and my signs which I have done among them; and ye shall know that I am Jehovah.

God speaks to Moses before the eighth plague. He explains why He has let the struggle with Pharaoh run so long. What happens in Egypt will become a story that children and grandchildren hear. The verse ties three things together: a hardened king, signs done in Egypt, and a people who come to know the LORD.

Why the Hardening Is Mentioned Here

The reason God gives for the state of Pharaoh's heart is not secrecy but display. One writer connects the hardening directly to the two audiences named in the verse — those watching then, and those who would only hear about it later.

Again the Lord reminds Moses that He Himself had hardened Pharaoh's heart and the hearts of his servants. He did this so that He might show His signs openly before them. He did it also so that God's great works of power might have a very real effect on Israel's present generation and on the generations to come. Then they would realize that it was indeed the living Lord of glory who was dealing with them (vv. 1-2).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The Order of Events

Where does the hardening fall in the sequence? One writer places it after Pharaoh has already set himself against God.

God had dealt graciously with Pharaoh. He gave him chance after chance to agree to what He asked. Pharaoh still hardened his heart, and showed his deep-rooted hatred and hostility to God and His people. Now this proud enemy comes under the hardening God sends in judgment… Unbelief never begins as the result of that hardening. But let there be no doubt that there is such a thing as hardening.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Another writer traces the blinding back to testimony that Pharaoh had already scorned.

God never made Pharaoh, or anyone else, wicked. They were wicked already, and they had plenty of urgent testimony. By God's judgment that testimony served only to blind the king. From the first he asked with scorn, "Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice and let Israel go? I do not know the LORD, and moreover, I will not let Israel go."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Stubbornness Turned Into Testimony

Pharaoh's refusal does not block God's purpose. It gives Him the occasion for more of it.

Generations not yet born should hear of the works of the Lord, and of how He stepped in for Israel. They should know that He is the Lord. Egyptian stubbornness would only serve to display the glory of God further.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Signs Done "Among Them"

The verse calls these events signs, not just punishments. One writer points first to what they exposed in Egypt, and then to what God meant them to teach Israel.

The plagues were signs as well as judgments. God sent them to prove who Jehovah was. Egypt once knew enough of God to keep it from idolatry. But it "did not see fit to acknowledge God," and so it had sunk into the worst idolatry. Above all, God sent the plagues to teach Israel that Jehovah alone is God.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

A Chain of Telling

Son and grandson are only the start of a line that keeps going. Another writer sets out that pattern and what the telling should produce.

God had "established a testimony" for the fathers to pass on to the children, and for the children to pass on to their children. He did it so that they might set their hope in God, walk in obedience, and not forget His works. In this way they would escape the stubbornness of earlier generations. Those generations did not set their affections on God, and their spirits were not steadfast with God.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Same Duty Today

What Israel owed its children, Christian families owe theirs.

And Christians may well tell their children what God has done. We should ground our little ones in the great truths of God's word. We should plant the facts of redemption, resurrection, and ascension in their minds and memories.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Another writer adds that the children's interest follows the parents' own.

One thing is sure: what deeply affects the parents will make an impression on the children… The story must pass from generation to generation. And how it warms the hearts of parents to see the eager way the children listen to it.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal. Pharaoh hardened his own heart first. God's hardening in judgment came only after Pharaoh had refused His testimony again and again. God never made any man wicked.

- Purpose. That refusal did not block God. Egyptian stubbornness only served to display God's glory further.

- Signs. The plagues were not just judgments on Egypt. Above all, God sent them to teach Israel that Jehovah alone is God.

- Telling. God established a testimony to pass from fathers to children, and from those children to theirs. The next generation would then set their hope in God and not forget His works.

- Knowing. The chain ends where the verse ends: they may know He is the LORD. So Christians today should ground their own children in redemption, resurrection, and ascension.

Exodus 10:3 · Darby

And Moses and Aaron came to Pharaoh, and said to him, Thus saith Jehovah the God of the Hebrews How long dost thou refuse to humble thyself before me? let my people go, that they may serve me.

Moses and Aaron come to Pharaoh again, and the message they bring is not a polite request. Three things carry the verse: who is speaking, what He asks of the king, and why He wants Israel let go.

The One who speaks

One writer points to the tone of the message:

Again Moses and Aaron entered the king's palace. Again they addressed him, carrying a fresh message from the God of the Hebrews. The language was plain. It was not the language of a courtier addressing his master. It was the true God speaking to His creature.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Pharaoh had once asked who this Lord was. He was finding out:

Pharaoh was learning, but was he submitting? He had now learned that the Lord was the God of the Hebrews. "Who is the Lord, that I should obey His voice?" he had asked, in anything but a meek spirit. Now he learns that the Lord really exists, and something of His power… God was becoming known to the Egyptians by acts of judgment — a fearful way of revealing Himself.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

"How long?" — the measure of God's patience

The question itself is a mercy. God sends one more message, and He warns of the locusts a day in advance:

Yet such is the patience of God that Moses was sent once more to Pharaoh with a protest and a demand that he let the people go. God warned him that, if he still refused, He would strike Egypt with swarms of locusts. This was to happen "tomorrow." In the previous chapter God twice announced a plague for tomorrow. That gave at least twenty-four hours' delay, in case Pharaoh should relent. In contrast, salvation, as we know, is always presented today.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The locusts were not inevitable:

The message named the only way of escape: Pharaoh must humble himself before the Lord, and let Israel go.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

"My people" — a contest over ownership

One word in the demand — "My" — settles the whole struggle:

The word to him was, "Let My people go…" So the Lord at once claimed the people as His. For a century or two the Pharaohs of Egypt had regarded the people as theirs, and enslaved to them. From the very start the two claims stood against each other. The Lord claimed the people that Pharaoh regarded as his own. Which claimant would prevail? The issue could not be in doubt for one moment.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Released for a purpose: "that they may serve me"

God is not only ending their misery. He gives a reason for the rescue, and He gives it again and again:

When God took up the people of Israel, He set His love on them, and wanted them to serve Him in response. The beginning of Exodus shows them under a slavery that was nothing like what God wanted for them. They were Pharaoh's slaves. Seven times, as far as I can trace, God said, "Let My son (or, let My people) go that they may serve Me." For the moment they were Pharaoh's servants. But God regarded them as "the sons of Israel," and He sets them free so that they might serve Him.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

But why did they have to leave Egypt to do it?

The Exodus is the separation of the people of God from the world… Israel was to go out of Egypt to serve the Lord, or hold a feast to Him. They could not serve Him or offer sacrifice to Him in the land of their slavery, in front of that people. Their religious service was of such a character that Egypt would not tolerate it.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

What refusing to humble yourself looks like

Pharaoh does eventually say the word "sinned" (v. 16) — and still does not bend. Commentators read him as the standing example of a confession that costs nothing:

He gives us the classic example of the sinner who defies God. Yet he is quite ready to take a humble attitude, if that helps him avoid reaping the punishment he deserves. We have to remember this word: "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy" (Proverbs 28:13). Under punishment Pharaoh did not mind doing a little confessing. But he had no idea of giving up his self-willed way.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Who asks. This is the true God speaking to His creature. It is not a courtier's request, but the Creator's claim on a king who had asked who the Lord was.

- How long. God's patience comes with a deadline. He sets the locusts for "tomorrow" — while salvation is always offered today.

- Whose people. Two owners claimed the same nation, and the outcome of that contest was never in doubt for a moment.

- What for. The demand carries its own purpose. They go free so that they may serve, and that service could not happen in Egypt.

- What refusing costs. Pharaoh confessed but did not change. God named one way of escape — humbling himself — and that was the one thing he refused.

Exodus 10:4 · Darby

For, if thou refuse to let my people go, behold, I will to-morrow bring locusts into thy borders;

Pharaoh has already lost his water, his livestock and his crops, and now a fresh message reaches him. It holds two things together: a condition still open ("if you refuse") and a deadline already set ("tomorrow").

The refusal of a creature

Everything hangs on Pharaoh's "no." One writer explains why that refusal could not last:

Pharaoh could not treat God's summons as nothing by refusing forever to obey. A creature resisting its Creator! Human will overcoming the divine will! That could not be. So God spoke to Moses again, told him what He would do, and gave His servant a fresh message for the stubborn ruler of the land of Egypt.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Why "tomorrow" and not "now"

The threat comes with a delay built into it. That gap is deliberate, and it fits a pattern already running through the earlier plagues:

Yet God is so patient that He sent Moses once more to Pharaoh with a protest and a demand that he let the people go. God warned Pharaoh that if he still refused, He would strike Egypt with swarms of locusts. This was to happen "tomorrow." In the previous chapter God twice announced a plague for tomorrow. That gave at least twenty-four hours' delay in case Pharaoh should relent. By contrast, salvation, as we know, is always offered today.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The hail had already stripped the land, and the locusts would finish it. Pharaoh also had reason to take the date seriously: every earlier "tomorrow" had arrived as announced.

The hail had killed the cattle. It also struck every plant of the field and broke every tree. The desolation was widespread. Now the locusts would complete it. Every green thing would be eaten. "Tomorrow," Moses had said, and the swarms of flies came the next day. "Tomorrow" was the warning for the disease on the livestock; the next day came, and it appeared. "Tomorrow" was the word for the hail, and the next day the Lord rained hail on the land. Every time, God sent the plague He had foretold. It did not wait a single day. Just one night came between the warning and the plague each time.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

What a swarm of locusts does

Here is what a swarm of locusts does to a land:

They are remarkable for the huge numbers that suddenly swarm over a district, and for the vast destruction of plant life they cause in a very short time. As the prophet says, before them the land may be like the garden of Eden, and behind them a desolate wilderness; nothing escapes them.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Egypt trusted a god to guard against this very danger:

Locusts covered the face of the whole earth and every green thing was destroyed. There is a vivid description of the damage locusts do in the book of Joel. Locusts are typical of God's punishing judgments. The locust plague was meant to show the helplessness of the Egyptian god Serapis, whom the Egyptians trusted to protect them from locusts.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

An army with no king of its own

"I will bring locusts" makes the insects God's instrument. One writer takes their strange order as evidence of whose they are:

Man may have departed from God and become hostile to Him. Yet nature in its whole framework obeys Him and still serves Him. So the sinner finds himself in a stream of hostile forces — the armies of the Lord. The army of locusts vividly pictures them for us. "The locusts have no king, yet all of them march in rank," says Agur. One observer says nothing in their habits is more striking than the stubbornness with which they all keep to the same line of march. They move like a disciplined army. This instinctive discipline, under an invisible king, shows whose armies they are and who marshals them: "His army," the Lord calls them.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The question the plague answered

Pharaoh had once said he did not know the Lord. The plagues had already answered him:

Could Pharaoh still say, "Who is the Lord? I do not know the Lord"? What an answer he had already been given. The Lord he did not know had power over the waters and over the ground. He had power over the bodies of men and animals, and power over the air. In what area of the natural world was He not supreme? He could foretell the plagues. He could bring the plagues. He alone could remove the plagues.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Condition — "If you refuse" leaves the door open. The plague hangs on one thing: whether Pharaoh will let God's people go.

- Deadline — "Tomorrow" gives twenty-four hours of delay, in case he relents. Salvation, by contrast, is always offered today.

- Credibility — every earlier "tomorrow" had arrived on time. This warning was no bluff.

- Instrument — locusts turn a garden into desert, and the god Egypt trusted could not stop them.

- Ownership — they march in rank with no king of their own, because they are the Lord's army. Whoever refuses Him finds creation lined up against him.

Exodus 10:5 · Darby

and they shall cover the face of the land, so that ye will not be able to see the land; and they shall eat the residue of that which is escaped, which ye have remaining from the hail, and shall eat every tree which ye have growing in the field;

God tells Moses to warn Pharaoh of a swarm so vast that the ground will vanish under it. The locusts will eat whatever the hail left, and then the trees in the fields. The threat raises two questions: why God announces a blow before He sends it, and what breaks a hard heart.

A blow announced a day early

God sets the locusts for "tomorrow." The delay has a reason.

Yet God is so patient that He sent Moses once more to Pharaoh with a protest and a demand that he let the people go. God warns him that if he still refused, He would strike Egypt with swarms of locusts. This was to happen "tomorrow." In the previous chapter God twice announced a plague for tomorrow. Each time He gave at least twenty-four hours of respite, in case Pharaoh might relent. In contrast to this, salvation, as we know, is always presented today.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

God had given Pharaoh that same gap before. Every time, the blow landed on schedule.

Moses had said "tomorrow" for the swarms of flies (8:23). The next day they came. "Tomorrow" was the warning for the disease among the cattle. The next day came, and the disease appeared (9:5). "Tomorrow" was the word for the hail (9:18). The next day the Lord rained hail on the land. Each time God sent the plague He had foretold. It did not delay for a single day.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Aimed at what the hail left

The locusts had a precise target: what the last plague had left. Two things survived the hail.

Even in those days everyone knew locusts as a serious plague. The warning made plain that this one would be worse: it would destroy all that was left in the land. The wheat and rye escaped before, but they would not escape this. The hail had broken the trees of the field, yet they were still in leaf. Now the locusts would strip them bare. Only one way of escape was open: Pharaoh must humble himself before the Lord and let Israel go.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A swarm that hides the ground

Locust swarms still do this today. Few disasters are feared more.

Today, in the east and in some parts of Africa, no disaster is feared more, and none leaves man more helpless. Locusts often devour every green thing. They fly in masses so dense that they blot out sun and sky.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The gods of Egypt had no answer

Egypt had its own god to keep locusts away.

Locusts covered the face of the whole earth and destroyed every green thing. The book of Joel vividly describes the damage locusts do. Locusts are a picture of God's judgments that punish. This plague aimed to show the powerlessness of the Egyptian god Serapis, whom the Egyptians trusted as their protector against locusts.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Pharaoh did not know this God. The plagues showed him how far His power reached.

The Lord whom he did not know had power over the waters, power over the ground, power over the bodies of men and animals, and power over the air. In what part of the natural world was He not supreme? He could foretell the plagues. He could bring the plagues. He alone could remove the plagues.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

A warning that carries past Egypt

The plagues were not only about one king and one country.

Chapter 10 opens with the Lord telling Moses that He had hardened their hearts, and so shut them up to their doom. That also gave the Lord the occasion to display Himself as the God of judgment in such a way that it would be remembered in generations to come. This witness still stands even in our day, and it will be remembered until the day of grace is followed by the time of judgment. Then God will deal in His righteous judgment and wrath not with Egypt only but with the whole earth, as pictured in Revelation 6-11, 15, 16. Of that coming day of judgment the plagues of Egypt were a small sample.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

No room to bargain

Pharaoh's answer to the threat was to bargain.

His servants protested. Moved by this, he recalled Moses and Aaron and proposed another cunning device, raising a question about who should go. In reply, Moses made it quite plain that there is no compromise permitted when God makes His demands. The Lord claimed the people as His: men, women, children and possessions.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned — God announced the locusts a day ahead, leaving room for Pharaoh to relent. Salvation, by contrast, is always offered today.

- Certain — every earlier "tomorrow" had come on time, so this threat carried a proven record.

- Thorough — the swarm targeted the leftovers: the grain the hail had missed and the trees it had only broken.

- Helpless — locusts blot out the sky and leave nothing green. Egypt's own god of protection could do nothing.

- Remembered — Pharaoh's one escape was to humble himself and let Israel go. He refused, so the plague stands as a witness and a small sample of judgment still to come.

Exodus 10:6 · Darby

and they shall fill thy houses, and the houses of all thy bondmen, and the houses of all the Egyptians; which neither thy fathers nor thy fathers' fathers have seen, since the day that they were upon the earth unto this day. And he turned and went out from Pharaoh.

Moses finishes his warning and walks out of the palace without waiting for a reply. The swarm he describes will fill every house in Egypt, on a scale no living person has ever seen.

A message delivered, not negotiated

Moses does not stay to bargain. One writer pictures how he and Aaron stood before the king:

The tone was severe. It is impossible to imagine them wringing their hands and bowing low before the king. "Thus says the LORD, the God of the Hebrews, 'How long will you refuse to humble yourself before me? Let my people go, that they may serve me,'" and then the alternative — locusts! — and without waiting for a reply, Moses "turned and went out from Pharaoh."

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

A warning with a deadline

Moses had set the locusts for the next day. Pharaoh already had a record of what "tomorrow" meant:

Tomorrow he had said; what "tomorrows" there had been. "Tomorrow" Moses had said the swarms of flies would come (8:23). On the next day they came. "Tomorrow" the plague on the livestock had been threatened. The next day came, and the animals died (9:5). "Tomorrow" the hail had been predicted (9:18). On the next day the LORD rained hail on the land. Each time the plague foretold was sent. It did not delay for a single day. Just one night came between the warning and the plague each time. And Pharaoh, waking on the new day, had to hear of the sorrow and destruction spreading over the country.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Nothing green left

The locusts would eat what the hail had spared. Egypt had already lost much before they came:

Horses, donkeys, camels, oxen and sheep had died in the plague on the livestock. Cattle had also been killed by the hail, which struck down every plant of the field and broke every tree as well. The flax and the barley had been struck too. The ruin was truly widespread. Now the locusts would complete it. Every green thing would be eaten. Plant life would seem to stop.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Locusts are not a random weapon. In Scripture they carry a settled meaning. In Egypt they also struck at a particular point of national confidence:

The book of Joel gives a vivid description of the damage locusts do. Locusts are typical of God's punitive judgments. The plague of locusts was meant to show that the Egyptian god Serapis had no power. The Egyptians trusted him as their protector against locusts. Locusts are also mentioned in a symbolic way in Revelation 9:1-12.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Beyond anything remembered

Moses set this swarm against everything earlier generations had seen. Ordinary swarms are already staggering:

In modern times enormous flights of locusts have covered an area of over a thousand miles. When they were driven into the sea, their bodies formed a bank on the shore about four feet high and fifty miles long! In India a piled-up mass of these insects stopped a railway train, as if it had run into a snowdrift. But the locusts threatened here were such as had never been before, and such as would never be again.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Told to sons and grandsons

The verse looks back to fathers and grandfathers. God had already told Moses to look forward:

"Go in to Pharaoh, for I have hardened his heart and the heart of his servants, that I may show these signs of mine among them, and that you may tell in the hearing of your son and of your grandson what signs I have done among them, that you may know that I am the LORD" (Ex. 10:1-2). Generations not yet born would hear of the works of the LORD. They would hear how He stepped in for Israel. They would know that He is the LORD. Egyptian stubbornness would only serve to display the glory of God further.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

A shaken court, an unmoved king

Moses left without an answer, and the warning went to work on the men around the throne:

The thought of it was terrible to the court. For the first time the flatterers around Pharaoh spoke out. The custom of the palace was set aside. A fear greater than their fear of the king drove them to speak.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Their appeal did not change the outcome:

The threat of the locusts eating what remained after the hail brought Pharaoh's servants to their senses. But Moses demanded that all should go — old and young, children and cattle — to keep their feast to the LORD (no word now of three days). So they were driven out from before the king, and the eighth blow fell all over the land. The powers of the air were at the LORD's command and against Egypt.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned. Every plague came announced, so Pharaoh was never struck without notice.

- Dated. "Tomorrow" had always meant tomorrow; each earlier threat arrived exactly on schedule.

- Total. What the hail spared, the locusts would eat. Every green thing gone, and Egypt's protector-god shown to have no power.

- Unmatched. Ordinary swarms can darken a thousand miles. This one went past anything the fathers or grandfathers could remember.

- Remembered. The point was not just ruin but testimony: sons and grandsons were to be told, so that they would know He is the LORD.

Exodus 10:7 · Darby

And Pharaoh's bondmen said to him, How long shall this man be a snare to us? let the men go, that they may serve Jehovah their God dost thou not yet know that Egypt is ruined?

The men around Pharaoh's throne break their silence and tell their king what he will not admit: the country is already in ruins. Their words raise a hard question — why can a man see the damage his own rebellion has done and still refuse to repent?

Fear of God above fear of the king

Until now the court had flattered Pharaoh and followed his lead. The threat of locusts changed that.

The prospect was terrifying to the court. For the first time the flatterers around Pharaoh spoke out. They set aside the usual custom of the palace. A fear greater than the fear of the king drove them. "Let the men go," they said; "do you not yet understand that Egypt is ruined?"

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

What they had learned about the God of the Hebrews

Their advice was short and blunt. Behind it lay a conclusion about the God they were dealing with.

They spoke in a tone that neither they nor the king were used to. They dropped flattery. Long speeches were out of the question. They spoke plainly, in words that were few, earnest and unmistakable... They were willing to get rid of Israel, and to do it at once and with no conditions. The God of the Hebrews, they were waking up to see, was not One to be trifled with.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Pharaoh's own household as witness against him

This verse is one link in a chain of admissions inside Egypt. God had His own purpose in Pharaoh, yet voices in Pharaoh's own court proved him responsible.

The Lord always acts for His own glory or name. "For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, 'For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth'" (Rom. 9:17). Yet the king of Egypt was responsible. His own people and the nations around him were witnesses of it. First we have Exodus 8:19: "Then the magicians said to Pharaoh, 'This is the finger of God.'" Second (Ex. 9:20), "Whoever feared the word of the LORD among the servants of Pharaoh hurried his slaves and his livestock into the houses." Third (Ex. 10:7), "Pharaoh's servants said to him, 'How long shall this man be a snare to us? Let the men go, that they may serve the LORD their God.'" Fourth (Ex. 11:3), "the man Moses was very great in the land of Egypt, in the sight of Pharaoh's servants and in the sight of the people."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Seeing the ruin without repenting

The servants could count the cost; Pharaoh could not. But seeing the damage is not the same as repenting, and the warning reaches far past Egypt.

In his blind hatred, Pharaoh did not know what his servants saw: the land of Egypt was ruined. His heart was hardened to his own destruction. The same warning goes to the Philistines: do not harden your hearts in the same way. So it is. Human nature can take a warning and steer its course to escape the worst of judgment, and never soften in the least into true repentance. This is simply another form of selfishness. It will save itself. It takes just enough interest in God's past dealings to learn how it can go on ignoring and despising Him with the least danger to itself.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

That verdict falls on the advisers too. Their alarm never became obedience.

Pharaoh's court stepped in when the locusts were threatened. Yet they would not yield to the LORD. They preferred Pharaoh's favour. The hardening of their hearts on that occasion is very striking.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The bargain that follows the plea

Their words did move the king to call Moses back — but only to negotiate over who would leave.

At their urging, "Moses and Aaron were brought back to Pharaoh. And he said to them, 'Go, serve the LORD your God. But which ones are to go?'" This shows once again the wretched heart of this most wretched king. If he is forced to, he will loosen his grip, but even then he will hold on to all he can. He clings so tightly to what he has that he will bargain, if he can, with Moses about who should leave.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Moses gave no ground. What he refused sets the pattern for every believer.

There is to be no compromise. The believer is to be for the Lord, his household is also for the Lord, and all that he possesses. Let every child of God have the same purpose of heart in this as Moses did.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Pressure speaks. A greater fear loosened the courtiers' tongues. They set aside palace custom and dropped their flattery.

- Pressure teaches. What they learned was limited but real — the God of the Hebrews is not One to be trifled with.

- Pressure convicts. Magicians, servants and court all speak up inside Egypt. That leaves the king with no excuse.

- Pressure does not convert. A warning can make a man dodge the worst of judgment without ever softening him into true repentance. These same advisers chose Pharaoh's favour over God's claim.

- Pressure bargains. Forced to loosen his grip, Pharaoh still tries to keep what he can. The answer to every such offer is no compromise: you, your household and all you own are for the Lord.

Exodus 10:8 · Darby

And Moses and Aaron were brought again to Pharaoh. And he said to them, Go, serve Jehovah your God. Who are they that shall go?

Locusts will strip whatever the hail left, and Pharaoh's own officials have told him Egypt is ruined. So he calls back the two men he threw out and seems to give way — but he attaches a question, and that question is the whole battle.

Why Pharaoh called them back

Pharaoh did not send for Moses out of a change of heart. His court forced his hand, and they did it in language a king rarely hears.

The threat of the locusts woke them up. They believed it would come unless the king relented. They knew of only one thing that could stop it: the king's surrender to the command given to him. So they had to speak. And speak they did, in a way that surely neither they nor the king was used to. Flattery was discarded. Wordiness was out of the question. They spoke in plain, blunt language, in words that were few, earnest, and impossible to mistake.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The question behind the permission

"Go, serve the LORD your God" sounds like surrender. The words that follow undo it.

This reveals once again the wretched heart of this most wretched king. If compelled, he will relax his grasp, but even then he will retain all that he can. He holds on tightly to what he had — so tightly that he will bargain with Moses, if he can, about who is allowed to leave.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

One offer in a series

Pharaoh pictures the energy of Satan, the ruler of this world, then as now. He fought every inch of the road. When hard pressed, he offered a series of compromises. Moses said to him, "Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel, 'Let my people go, that they may hold a feast to me in the wilderness.'" Pharaoh said, "Go, sacrifice to your God within the land" — that is, set up worldly worship... Then Pharaoh said, "I will let you go to sacrifice to the LORD your God in the wilderness; only you must not go very far away" — that is, don't be very separate. His next question was, "Go, serve the LORD your God. But which ones are to go?" Moses replies, "We will go with our young and our old. We will go with our sons and daughters and with our flocks and herds, for we must hold a feast to the LORD." Pharaoh answers, "No! Go, the men among you, and serve the LORD." This means the parents may be for the Lord, but the children must be kept in the world.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why a half-deliverance is no deliverance

Moses answers with young and old, sons and daughters, flocks and herds. Nothing less would take Israel out of Egypt.

Parents in the wilderness and their children in Egypt! Terrible anomaly! That would have been only a half deliverance — useless to Israel and dishonouring to Israel's God. This could not be. If the children stayed in Egypt, you could not say the parents had left it, since their children were part of themselves. At most you could say they were serving Jehovah in part and Pharaoh in part. But Jehovah could have no part with Pharaoh. He should either have all or nothing.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The hostage strategy

The offer was a trap. Leaving the children behind would have brought the whole nation back.

With an arrangement like that, the shrewd negotiator knew very well he would have them all back in his power sooner or later. If the Hebrews had gone without their children, their hearts would have stayed in Egypt while their bodies were in the wilderness. That is a miserable condition and an insult to God. Their bodies are no use to Him without their hearts.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

God's answer to Pharaoh's question

Pharaoh asked who would go. God's answer runs the other way, and it still stands in the New Testament.

In God's plan, however, the little one's place was with the parents. Pharaoh's plan was to keep hold of the fathers through the children. God's plan is to save the children along with the fathers, and through them... "The promise is for you and for your children," says the apostle on the day of Pentecost.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Pressure, not repentance — Pharaoh's own officials told him Egypt was ruined. He reopened talks out of fear, not out of a changed heart.

- Concession with a catch — He grants the words "serve the LORD," then takes the ground back with one question: who may go?

- Half out is still in — Children left behind would leave the parents only half out. They would serve God in part and Pharaoh in part.

- Hostages, not kindness — Whatever stays in Egypt keeps the heart in Egypt, and the body follows it back.

- All, or nothing — Moses names young, old, sons, daughters, flocks and herds. God claims every person and everything His redeemed people have.

Exodus 10:9 · Darby

And Moses said, We will go with our young and with our old, with our sons and with our daughters; with our flocks and with our herds will we go; for we have a feast of Jehovah.

Plague after plague has worn Pharaoh down, and at last he offers terms — but he demands to know who is going. Moses answers that every person and every animal goes, and gives one reason: a feast to the Lord.

Pharaoh's Bargain

The king's question is not curiosity. He is bargaining over how much of Israel he can keep.

This reveals once again the wretched heart of this most wretched king. If forced, he will loosen his grip, but even then he will hold on to all he can. He clings to what he had, and clings so tightly that he will bargain, if he can, with Moses about who should leave.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Pharaoh's offer — men out, children in — would have left Israel half-delivered.

Parents in the wilderness and their children in Egypt! What a terrible contradiction! This would only have been a half deliverance, useless to Israel and dishonouring to Israel's God. It could not be. If the children stayed in Egypt, no one could say that the parents had left it, since their children were part of themselves.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

"With Our Young And Our Old"

Moses refuses to separate what God has joined together.

We should always remember — strange that we should ever forget! — that our children are part of ourselves. God's creative hand has made them so; and surely what the Creator has joined together, the Redeemer would not separate. So we always find that God links a man and his house together. "You and your house" is a phrase of deep practical meaning. It carries the highest consequences. It brings the richest comfort to every Christian parent. And we may truly add this: neglecting it has led to the most disastrous results in thousands of family circles.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Two Opposite Strategies

Pharaoh and God both have a plan for the children, and the two plans pull in opposite directions.

So here is another attempt to narrow the limits of salvation. The men may go; the little ones must stay. In God's plan, though, the little one's place was with the parents. Pharaoh's aim was to keep hold of the fathers through the children; God's thought is to save the children along with, and through, the fathers. Noah's house, in the ark with him, is the first example... The new is fuller still of this: "Today salvation has come to this house," says the Lord about Zacchaeus. "The promise is for you and for your children," says the apostle on the day of Pentecost. And once more, to the Philippian jailer: "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household."

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The Reason Moses Gives

Moses does not argue about what small children can understand. He points to the occasion itself.

The reason they were to take the little ones and everything else with them was that they were going to hold a feast to the Lord. Nature might say, "What can these little creatures know about a feast to the Lord? Are you not afraid of making them formalists?" The reply of Moses is simple and decisive: "We will go with our young... for we must hold a feast to the Lord." They had no thought of seeking one thing for themselves and another for their children. They never dreamed of Canaan for themselves and Egypt for their children.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Flocks And Herds Too

The list does not stop at people. The flocks and herds go too, and redemption is the reason.

Moses is very clear about who shall go... Everyone they loved and everything they owned was to go. All for God — that was Moses' motto. Christian mothers, converted fathers, do you see this? We are not going to be a divided family, says Moses; and more than that, we shall take every sheep and every bullock we own, for it all belongs to God. Why? Because redemption puts you on the ground of belonging to God completely.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why It Could Not Happen In Egypt

The feast is the whole point of the departure, and it is the one thing Egypt could never host.

The Exodus is the separation of the people of God from the world. And I was recently struck by this feature of the scene: Israel was to go out of Egypt to serve the Lord, or hold a feast to Him. They could not serve Him or sacrifice to Him in the land of their slavery, in front of the Egyptians. Their worship was of such a character that Egypt would not tolerate it. It went so far against everything the Egyptians thought that they would persecute and destroy them if they saw it. So they had to go out.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Feast — Moses gives one reason for taking everybody: they must hold a feast to the Lord. Egypt could never host that worship.

- Whole — so nothing stays behind: young, old, sons, daughters, flocks and herds all go. Redemption makes the whole of life God's.

- House — children are part of their parents. On the principle of "you and your house," God's way is to save the children along with the fathers.

- Half — Pharaoh offers a half deliverance: parents in the wilderness, children still in Egypt. That would leave the parents not out of Egypt either.

- Bargain — Pharaoh gives ground only under pressure and keeps whatever he can. Each offer holds back part of what belongs to God.

Exodus 10:10 · Darby

And he said to them, Let Jehovah be so with you, as I let you go, and your little ones see that evil is before you!

Nine plagues have worn Pharaoh down, and now he tries to settle the matter by bargaining: the men may go and worship, but the little ones stay. His words carry a sneer at the Lord, a threat, and a charge that Israel is plotting evil.

A threat wrapped in mock piety

Pharaoh's opening line sounds like a blessing, but he does not mean it as one. He mocks the thought that the God of Israel can help them. His closing words can be read two ways: as an accusation of evil intent, or, as older translations put it, as a warning that "evil is before you" — trouble waiting ahead.

He tried to intimidate Moses. He warned him that if they all left they would run into serious trouble. And he implied, with a sneer, that they could not depend on any real help from the Lord being with them (v. 10).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The children as hostages

The offer looks generous. It is Pharaoh's most cunning move yet: whoever holds the children holds the parents.

Next (Ex. 10:10), Pharaoh would profess to let the people go, while retaining their little ones. A more cunning and preposterous suggestion could not be made. What more effective way of bringing the people back to Egypt than by holding fast their families in bondage? Sadly, letting the world rule in the home has spoiled many a testimony and many a complete separation!

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Half a deliverance is no deliverance

Leaving the children behind would split Israel between two masters. God takes no divided service.

Parents in the wilderness and their children in Egypt! Terrible contradiction! This would only have been a half deliverance, at once useless to Israel and dishonouring to Israel's God. This could not be. If the children remained in Egypt, no one could say the parents had left it, since their children were part of themselves. At best they would be serving Jehovah in part and Pharaoh in part. But Jehovah could have no part with Pharaoh. He should either have all or nothing.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Where the heart is left behind

Pharaoh knew where hearts follow. Leave the children in Egypt, and the parents' affections stay there too.

By such an arrangement that shrewd negotiator knew perfectly well that he would have them all back in his power sooner or later. If the Hebrews had gone without their children, their hearts would have stayed in Egypt while their bodies were in the wilderness. That is a miserable condition and an insult to God, for their bodies are no use to Him without their hearts. God's purpose is to bring them entirely out of Egypt. He would fix all the objects of their interest and affections outside its borders — "to deliver us from the present evil age," and to set our "minds on things that are above." Pharaoh's purpose is to fix the objects of their love and interest in the old kingdom of sin and condemnation. In that way he keeps them tied to it as tightly as if bound by chains.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

You and your household

God deals with families the other way round. Writers trace one pattern from Noah into the New Testament — and mark its limit.

The men may go; the little ones must remain. In God's plan, however, the little one's place was with the parents. Pharaoh's thought was to keep hold of the fathers by means of the children; God's thought is to save the children with, and by means of, the fathers. Noah's house, in the ark with him, is the first example... The new is still more full of this: "Today salvation has come to this house," says the Lord about Zacchaeus. "The promise is for you and for your children," says the apostle on the day of Pentecost... And once again to the Philippian jailer: "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household."... It does not follow automatically that if a man is saved himself, his house will be saved too.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

One move in a longer campaign

This offer is one of four. Set beside Pharaoh's other offers in Exodus, it forms a chain of retreats, each one still holding something back.

With what persistence Satan disputed every inch of Israel's way out of the land of Egypt! He first tried to keep them in the land. Then he tried to keep them near the land. Next he tried to keep part of themselves in the land. When none of these three worked, he tried to send them out without any ability to serve the Lord. If he could not keep the servants, he would seek to keep their ability to serve, which would answer much the same purpose.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Sneer. Pharaoh's "the LORD be with you" is mockery and threat in one. He hints that God will be no real help, and that trouble waits outside.

- Leverage. Holding the children was the surest way to bring the parents back. Families kept in Egypt are chains on people already in the wilderness.

- Hearts. Bodies in the wilderness with hearts still in Egypt is no deliverance. God's aim is to move everything a person loves outside Egypt's border.

- All or nothing. Children are part of their parents. A divided Israel would serve Jehovah in part and Pharaoh in part, and God accepts no such split.

- Household. Pharaoh holds fathers by their children. God saves children with their fathers — Noah's house, Zacchaeus's house, the jailer's house.

Exodus 10:11 · Darby

Not so go now, ye [that are] men, and serve Jehovah! for it is that ye have desired. And they were driven out from Pharaoh's presence.

Moses has just told Pharaoh who is going: everyone — young and old, sons and daughters, flocks and herds. Verse 11 is the king's counter-offer, and it ends with Moses and Aaron thrown out of the palace.

A bargain, not a release

Pharaoh does not say no. He says some. He has stopped refusing outright and started bargaining.

This reveals once again the wretched heart of this most wretched king. If compelled, he will relax his grasp, but even then he will retain all that he can. He clings so tightly to what he had that he will bargain, if he can, with Moses about who should leave.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why the children were the target

The offer was not generosity. It was insurance.

By their little ones he had them safe, of course — a perfectly good security that they would not go far away. And so it is still. How many are brought back into the world by the children they did not bring with them out of the world.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The same writer sets Pharaoh's plan against God's. He then traces God's pattern through the rest of Scripture:

The men may go; the little ones must remain. In God's plan, however, the little one's place was with the parents. Pharaoh's thought was to keep hold of the fathers by means of the children; God's thought is to save the children with, and by means of, the fathers. Noah's household, in the ark with him, is the first example... The New Testament is still more full of this: "Today salvation has come to this house," says the Lord about Zacchaeus. "The promise is for you and for your children," says the apostle on the day of Pentecost. And once again to the Philippian jailer: "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household."

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Half a deliverance

Moses could not take that deal. The reason runs deeper than family feeling.

Parents in the wilderness and their children in Egypt! Terrible contradiction! This would only have been a half deliverance, useless to Israel and dishonouring to Israel's God. This could not be. If the children remained in Egypt, the parents could not possibly be said to have left it, since their children were part of themselves. The most that could be said in such a case was that in part they were serving the Lord, and in part Pharaoh. But the Lord could have no part with Pharaoh. He should either have all or nothing.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The tone of the refusal

Read alongside verse 10, the offer carries a sneer. He warns them of trouble ahead, then claims he is only granting their own request.

He tried to intimidate Moses by warning him that if they all left they would run into serious trouble, sarcastically implying that they could not count on any real help from the Lord being with them (v. 10). He would give permission only for the men to go, knowing that they would soon return when they did not have their families with them. So Moses and Aaron were driven out from Pharaoh's presence (v. 11). Such is the stubborn pride of an ungodly man of the world, influenced by Satan!

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

One offer in a series

Verse 11 is the third in a run of offers, each conceding a little more ground while keeping something back.

With what persistence Satan disputed every inch of Israel's way out of the land of Egypt! He first tried to keep them in the land, then to keep them near the land, next to keep part of themselves in the land, and finally, when he could not succeed in any of these three, he tried to send them out without any ability to serve the Lord. If he could not keep the servants, he would try to keep their ability to serve, which would achieve much the same end.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same trap today

The trap did not close with Pharaoh.

And how many Christians are caught in this snare! They claim to be the Lord's and to have left Egypt, yet they allow their families to stay behind... Nowhere does our testimony break down so plainly as in our families. Godly parents, whose own walk is blameless, are talked into allowing their children things they would never allow themselves, and so they flood their houses with the sights and sounds of Egypt.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- All. Moses asked for all — young and old, sons and daughters, flocks and herds. Pharaoh answered: the men only.

- Bargain. Pharaoh no longer refuses; he negotiates. Under pressure he loosens his grip, but keeps everything he can.

- Hostage. The children left behind were security. Whoever holds the family holds the men. Many drift back into the world through the children they never brought out of it.

- Half. Parents free and children still in Egypt is only half a rescue — part serving the Lord, part serving Pharaoh. God will have all or nothing.

- Series. This is one of four attempts: keep Israel in the land, keep them near it, keep part of them behind, then take away their ability to serve. Each concession sounds reasonable; each keeps something back.

Exodus 10:12 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Moses, Stretch out thy hand over the land of Egypt for the locusts, that they may come up over the land of Egypt, and eat every herb of the land -- all that the hail hath left.

Exodus 10:12 comes at the moment when talking stops and God acts. Pharaoh has just refused to let the whole nation go, Moses and Aaron have been thrown out of the palace, and now the command names its target: the locusts are to eat whatever the hail had spared.

Why the blow falls here

Pharaoh had offered a bargain: the men could go and worship, but the families must stay. Commentators read that offer as a trap, and its refusal as the reason the eighth plague lands.

Pharaoh tried to bargain. He would let the men go and sacrifice, but all the rest would stay in his power. He knew enough of human nature to be sure that this would bring the men back under his authority... The offer was: let each man go, but let him leave his household behind. But if God was to have any, He would have all.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Moses had asked for everyone. He no longer even mentioned the three-day journey.

The threat that locusts would eat what the hail had left brought Pharaoh's servants to their senses. But Moses demanded that all should go — old and young, children and cattle — to keep their feast to Jehovah. There was not a word about three days now. So Moses and Aaron are driven out from the king's presence, and the eighth blow falls all over the land. The powers of the air were at the command of Jehovah and against Egypt.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The hand that holds the rod

In that world a rod in the hand meant authority, and Egypt's own monuments put one in the hands of its gods.

In the East the rod is a symbol of authority and power... Hundreds of Egypt's old monuments show gods and men holding rods like sceptres... Satan had the power and the authority, and Jehovah would hand these over to Moses as His servant. Again and again, as the story goes on, Moses is said to hold the rod of God.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The same rod runs through the whole contest, from the first sign to the Red Sea:

It first swallowed up the rods of Egypt, to show that no strength could stand before God's strength... Then the rod brings the plagues of blood, of frogs, and of lice, until the magicians admit that they cannot match their strength against the Lord's (Ex. 8:19). It is then used in the plagues of hail (Ex. 9:23), locusts (Ex. 10:13), and darkness (Ex. 10:22). At the end it is used to destroy the firstborn, to deliver Israel, and to overthrow Egypt in the Red Sea (Ex. 12 - 14).

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The wind that carries the army

Between the raised hand and the arriving swarm stands an ordinary east wind. One writer pictures the angry court while the answer is already on its way.

The court may have been too full of anger to hear the threatening sound of the rising east wind. Moses had already lifted the rod at God's command. The wind had risen, and it blew for the rest of the day and all through the night. Jehovah's army of the skies had been waiting twenty-four hours away, and it was already in flight.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The wind is God's servant, not an accident:

The wind, as all else, is used by God to work out His purposes with man. Ex. 10:13; Ps. 135:7; Ezek. 13:13.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

"All that the hail has left"

The command points back. The hail had already flattened much of Egypt, and the locusts are sent for what is left.

Horses, donkeys, camels, oxen and sheep had died in the disease that struck the livestock. The hail had killed cattle too. It also struck down every plant of the field and broke every tree. The flax and the barley had been struck as well. The ruin really was general. Now the locusts would complete it. They would eat every green thing. Plant life would seem to come to an end.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Total ruin of the land still does not produce surrender:

Hail and lightning together break the fruit trees of the land. The locusts then strip it of every green leaf that can be found. The ruin is complete, yet their rebellious pride is still not humbled. One last decisive blow is needed to make them give in.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Egypt's failed protector

Egypt had a god assigned to this very danger, and the swarm exposed him.

The locusts covered the face of the whole earth and destroyed every green thing... Locusts are a picture of God's judgments that punish. This plague of locusts was meant to show the helplessness of the Egyptian god Serapis, whom the Egyptians trusted as their protector against locusts.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal — Pharaoh offered half: the men could go, the families must stay. God asks for all, not part.

- Rod — the raised hand holds the rod of God, used from the first sign to the Red Sea. The authority Egypt claimed now rests in the hand of God's servant.

- Wind — an east wind carries God's army while the court is still fuming. The weather runs His errands.

- Residue — the locusts take what the hail spared. The ruin is complete, and nothing is left to lean on.

- Result — total ruin, and a failed Egyptian god, still do not bend Pharaoh. One last blow is needed.

Exodus 10:13 · Darby

And Moses stretched out his staff over the land of Egypt, and Jehovah brought an east wind on the land all that day and all that night. When it was morning, the east wind brought the locusts.

Pharaoh has just driven Moses and Aaron out of his palace, and God answers the king's last word with a wind. Why does God work through weather rather than a bare command, and what does an east wind mean in Scripture?

The Air Obeys Him

Eight plagues in, the arena of God's power widens again. Now the sky itself obeys.

The threat of the locusts to eat what remained from the hail brought Pharaoh's servants to their senses. But Moses demanded that all should go — old and young, children and cattle — to keep their feast to the Lord. There was not a word about three days now. So Moses and Aaron are driven out from before the king, and the eighth blow falls all over the land. The powers of the air were at the command of the Lord and against Egypt.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The wind is not a background detail. Scripture counts it among the tools God keeps in hand.

God uses the wind, as He uses everything else, to work out His purposes with man. Ex. 10:13; Ps. 135:7; Ezek. 13:13. As the unseen wind comes and goes, and we do not know where, "so it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit." John 3:8. You feel its power, and the result lasts.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why an East Wind

Of all directions, this one carries a settled meaning through Scripture.

The east wind was harsh and destructive to plants (Gen. 41:6, 23, 27). It was dangerous to ships at sea (Ps. 48:7; Ezek. 27:26). It is a symbol of the withering power of God's judgements. Hosea 13:15.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What the wind carried had a target too. Egypt kept a god for this very danger.

The book of Joel gives a vivid description of the damage locusts do. Locusts are typical of God's punitive judgments. This plague was meant to show that the Egyptian god Serapis had no power. The Egyptians had trusted him as their protector against locusts. Revelation 9:1-12 also mentions locusts in a symbolic way.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Day and a Night of Waiting

The wind blows for about a day before anything appears. That gap is the distance the swarm had to cross. The wind both calls the swarm and carries it.

The court was probably too full of anger to hear the ominous sound of the rising east wind. Moses had already lifted the rod at God's bidding. The wind rose, and it blew for all the remaining hours of the day and on through the night. Already the Lord's army of the skies, which had been lying at twenty-four hours' distance, was on the wing. Obeying the call of the wind, the huge host arose, and, carried on its gusts, the myriads sped on towards the land of Egypt.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Morning Keeps the Appointment

Moses had said "tomorrow" and the locusts land in the morning. By now this was a pattern Pharaoh could have counted on.

Moses delivered his message, and left the king and his courtiers to think it over. He had said tomorrow; what "tomorrows" there had been. "Tomorrow," Moses had said, the swarms of flies would come (8:23). On the next day they came. "Tomorrow" the cattle disease had been threatened. The next day came, and the disease appeared (9:5). "Tomorrow" the hail had been predicted (9:18). On the next day the Lord rained hail on the land. Each time God sent the plague He had foretold. It did not delay for a single day. Just one night came between the warning and the plague each time.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Nature Turned Against the Rebel

Was this a miracle or ordinary weather? Commentators note that the judgments here also follow natural lines.

But notice now, as every commentary points out, that these judgments of God which begin here have to some degree their natural counterparts... Such a link between these divine judgments and ordinary events surely has meaning for us. It is not only the sparing use of the miraculous, which many have remarked on. Much more, it shows how the whole order of nature marshals itself under the divine hand against the one who breaks His law.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What arrived on that wind was without parallel, before or since.

At the command of the Lord, Moses stretched out the rod in his hand over the land of Egypt. The east wind blew that day and night. It brought a tremendous swarm of locusts, such as had never been before, and we are told there would never again be such a scourge (v. 14).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Command — Pharaoh spoke his last word, and God acted. The powers of the air were at the Lord's command and against Egypt.

- Courier — the wind is God's servant. It blew a full day and night to fetch an army already waiting at twenty-four hours' distance.

- Character — an east wind is Scripture's picture of withering judgment. Locusts are typical of God's punitive judgments, aimed here at a god Egypt trusted for protection from them.

- Clock — "tomorrow" was the promise, and morning kept it. Every plague foretold came without a day of delay.

- Creation — the plague ran along ordinary lines of nature. Even so, the whole order of nature marshals itself under God's hand against the one who rebels.

Exodus 10:14 · Darby

And the locusts went up over all the land of Egypt, and rested in all the borders of Egypt, very grievous; before them there were no such locusts as they, neither after them will be such.

Hail had already stripped Egypt. This verse marks the moment the locusts land, and it raises two questions: what brought them, and why no swarm like it would ever come again.

The wind that carried them

The locusts did not drift in by chance.

At the command of the Lord, Moses stretched out the rod in his hand over the land of Egypt. The east wind blew that day and night. It brought a tremendous swarm of locusts such as had never been before, and we are told there would never again be such a scourge (v. 14).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The wind mattered for more than transport.

In the last two plagues God used the air and the wind to work His will. The locust obeys the wind. These plagues set aside Egypt's deities of air and wind, as earlier plagues had set aside their deities of earth and water.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

A swarm without equal

Bad locust swarms were nothing new in that part of the world.

The records of the east hold plenty of accounts of the damage a bad swarm of locusts does. This blow was so severe that there had never been such locusts before, and there never would be again. So we can imagine the terrible plight of the land of Egypt.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the land looked like afterwards

A swarm this size does not merely damage crops. It leaves a country unrecognisable — and it spared no district, not even the region where Israel lived.

Then came the rush of the wings of the moving millions. A moment later the devouring hosts covered the land, and the noise of their unstoppable jaws filled it. Every green thing fell before them. They took away all that the hail had left. So far as the eye could reach, the land of Egypt was a wilderness, as barren as the yellow deserts on its borders. Goshen — the garden of Egypt — also fell under the plague, for its fruits and its crops were no longer necessary for Israel.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

The answer to Pharaoh's question

Pharaoh — Meneptah — began this contest by asking who the Lord was that he should obey Him.

Eight plagues had now been sent, and this last a dreadful one. Locusts on the ground, covering the face of it, so that the land was darkened. Locusts, too, in their houses, and filling them. And when they were gone, not a green thing in herb or tree could be seen. Could Meneptah still say, "Who is the Lord? I do not know the Lord." What an answer he had already received. The Lord he did not know had power over the waters, over the ground, over the bodies of men and animals, and over the air. In what area of the natural world was He not supreme? He could foretell the plagues. He could bring the plagues. He alone could remove the plagues.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The blow landed on Egypt's religion too.

The book of Joel gives a vivid description of the damage locusts do. Locusts are a picture of God's judgments in punishment. The locust plague was aimed to show the powerlessness of the Egyptian god Serapis. The Egyptians trusted him as their protector against locusts. Locusts are also mentioned in a symbolic way in Revelation 9:1-12.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

An army under orders

Locusts move with a discipline no one commands, and Scripture names the commander.

Man may have departed from God and become hostile to Him. But nature in its whole framework is obedient, and serves Him still. So the sinner finds himself in a stream of hostile forces, the hosts of the Lord. The army of locusts gives us a vivid picture of them. "The locusts have no king," says Agur, "yet all of them march in rank." (Proverbs 30:27.) This instinctive discipline, under an invisible king, shows whose hosts they are and who marshals them: the Lord calls them "His army." (Joel 2:11.)

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Wind — The swarm came on an east wind at God's word. The air itself, and every god Egypt trusted in it, lay under His hand.

- Weight — This blow stood alone: no such locusts before it, none after it, and not a green thing left in tree or field.

- Reach — Water, ground, bodies and now the air had all obeyed Him. Pharaoh had asked, "Who is the Lord?" Every area of nature gave him the answer.

- Rank — Locusts march in rank with no king, and the Lord calls them "His army." Even the insect world serves His purposes.

- Rivals — Egypt trusted the god Serapis to guard it from locusts. The plague showed him powerless, as earlier plagues had shown the gods of earth and water.

Exodus 10:15 · Darby

And they covered the face of the whole land, so that the land was darkened; and they ate every herb of the land, and all the fruit of the trees that the hail had left; and there remained not any green thing on the trees, and in the herbs of the field, throughout the land of Egypt.

A swarm of locusts settles over the whole land of Egypt. It blots out the light and eats everything the hail had spared. The verse records a country stripped bare. It raises two questions: who commands such an army, and why God sent it against Egypt.

The scene on the ground

One writer pictures how that morning looked and sounded. Even Goshen, where Israel lived, was hit this time.

In the early morning, right on time, a yellow fringe appeared all along the eastern horizon. It spread fast across the sky. Like a dense brown cloud, it covered the blue and shut out the light. Then came the rush of wings from the moving swarms. A moment later the devouring hosts covered the land and filled it with the noise of their unstoppable jaws. Every juicy plant fell before them. They took away all that the hail had left. As far as the eye could see, the land of Egypt was a wilderness, as barren as the yellow deserts on its borders. Goshen — the garden of Egypt — also came under the plague, for its fruits and crops were no longer needed for Israel.

Modernised from H. Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

What the hail spared

The words "that the hail had left" tie this plague to the last one. The hail had broken trees and flattened crops, but not everything. The locusts finished the job, and the warning came with a way out.

Even in those days locusts were well known as a serious plague. The warning made the extra severity of this one clear: it would destroy all that was left in the land. The wheat and rye had escaped before, but they would not escape this. Also, the hail had broken the trees of the field, but they were still in leaf. Now the locusts would strip them bare. There was one way of escape: Pharaoh must humble himself before the Lord and let Israel go.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

An army under orders

Locusts have no visible leader, yet they move like a trained army. One writer sees a clue there to who directs them.

Man may have departed from God and become hostile to Him, but nature in its whole framework is obedient, and serves Him still. So the sinner finds himself in a stream of hostile forces — the hosts of the Lord. The army of locusts pictures them for us. "The locusts have no king," says Agur, "yet all of them march in rank" (Prov. 30:27)... This instinctive discipline, under a king no one can see, shows whose hosts they are and who commands them. The Lord calls them "His army" (Joel 2:11)... To fight them is hopeless. The destruction they cause is total: "The land is like the garden of Eden before them, but behind them a desolate wilderness, and nothing escapes them" (Joel 2:3).

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Aimed at Egypt's gods

This plague was not random damage. It had a specific target.

Locusts covered the face of the whole land and destroyed every green thing. The book of Joel gives a vivid description of the damage locusts do. Locusts are typical of God's punitive judgments. The plague of locusts aimed to show the powerlessness of the Egyptian god Serapis. The Egyptians trusted him as their protector against locusts. Locusts are also mentioned symbolically in Revelation 9:1-12.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

No corner of creation left

The idols could do nothing here. The plagues showed Pharaoh a God at work in every part of the natural world.

Pharaoh did not know this Lord. Yet He had power over the waters, power over the ground, power over the persons of men and animals, and power over the air. In what area of the natural world was He not supreme? He could foretell the plagues. He could bring the plagues. He alone could remove the plagues. He did what the idols could not. He proved to be the absolute Master of the powers of nature. He alone decides the destiny of His creatures, and He would prove that too.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The confession that did not last

This ruin broke Pharaoh — for a moment. One writer follows the locusts to their end, and shows who followed them there.

Pharaoh took a humble attitude. He confessed that he had sinned and asked for a forgiveness that would also remove the punishment. The Lord knew his heart, yet He listened to his plea. By a strong west wind He removed the locusts so completely that not one was left. The locusts were drowned in the Red Sea. Not many days later Pharaoh and his armies were drowned there too.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Total — The locusts took everything the hail had left. Egypt was as barren as the deserts on its borders.

- Targeted — The plague struck at Serapis, the god Egypt trusted for protection from locusts. Locusts picture God's punitive judgments.

- Commanded — Locusts have no king, yet they march in ranks. The Lord calls them "His army." The sinner who defies God meets forces that still serve Him.

- Comprehensive — Water, ground, people, animals, air: Pharaoh met a God who could foretell the plagues, bring them, and alone remove them.

- Temporary — Pharaoh's confession lasted only as long as the pressure. The locusts drowned in the Red Sea, and soon he did too.

Exodus 10:16 · Darby

And Pharaoh called Moses and Aaron in haste; and he said, I have sinned against Jehovah your God, and against you.

The locusts have stripped Egypt bare, and Pharaoh sends for Moses and Aaron in haste. His words sound like those of a broken man — but what is a confession like this worth?

The confession the locusts squeezed out

Pharaoh does not send for Moses in a calm hour of reflection. He calls him while the locusts eat his land. He names both the Lord and His servants as the ones he has wronged. But he asks for one thing only: this plague gone.

Under the pressure of this severe blow, Pharaoh summoned Moses and Aaron into his presence again. He confessed his sin against the Lord their God and against them. He begged forgiveness, and asked them to plead with the Lord their God "only to remove this death from me." The Lord heard the plea of Moses. He removed the locusts and cast them into the Red Sea.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

God answered Moses and lifted the plague. That mercy shows His patience with a rebel:

God is never impatient, even in the face of open rebellion. He waits for His own time, bearing with the wickedness and ungodliness of men in long-suffering and grace.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Confession under fear

Pharaoh had said these words once before, when the hail fell. Saying them a second time raises a hard question.

Pharaoh had once said, "I have sinned" (9:27). He said it now again. But confession under fear — what is it worth? … In this there was no work of conscience, no real repentance. He wanted God's hand removed from his land; that was all. It was removed. But his heart stayed as hard as ever.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Confessing without forsaking

A confession can use the right words and still change nothing. The test is not the wording but the will behind it.

He gives us the classic example of the sinner who defies God. Yet he is quite ready to look humble, if that helps him avoid reaping the punishment he deserves. We have to remember this word: "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy" (Prov. 28:13). Under chastening, Pharaoh did not mind a little confessing. But he had no idea of forsaking his self-willed way. The fair words he spoke in verses 16 and 17 of our chapter were merely an effort to avoid further punishment.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The same words, opposite outcomes

The same three words come from very different men in Scripture. The outcomes split in two.

Many men in Scripture take the place of saying, "I have sinned." It is very remarkable that not all of them get cleansing. David (2 Samuel 12:13), Nehemiah (Nehemiah 9:33), Job (Job 40:4; 42:6), Isaiah (Isaiah 6:5; 64:6), Jeremiah (Jeremiah 14:7, 20), Daniel (Daniel 9:5), Micah (Micah 7:9), the prodigal son (Luke 15:21), and the thief on the cross (Luke 23:41) all took the place of sinners. They all received cleansing or blessing. But look at Pharaoh (Exodus 9:27; 10:16), Balaam (Numbers 22:34), Achan (Joshua 7:20), Saul (1 Samuel 15:24; 26:21), Shimei (2 Samuel 19:20), and Judas (Matthew 27:4). These all confess they have sinned, yet they perish. … There was no hatred of the sin. There was no desire to turn from it and give it up. There was no true repentance.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

David used the same words. The difference was who he had in view.

In David's case how different. He was not thinking of his reputation before men, and how that could be saved. He saw and confessed what his guilt was before God. He cast himself on Him without reserve.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Dodging the blow, keeping the heart

Self-interest can study God's dealings closely. The aim is not to be changed, but to work out how little it must give up.

Human nature can take warnings and steer its course to escape the worst of judgment, and never soften in the least into true repentance. It is only another form of selfishness. Such a heart will save itself. It takes just enough interest in God's past ways to learn one thing. It wants to know how to go on ignoring and despising Him with the least danger to itself.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Pressure: The confession comes while the locusts eat Egypt. The timing shows what produced it.

- Words: He says the right thing. He had said it once before under the hail, and changed neither time.

- Motive: He asks for the plague to go, not for sin to go. He wanted relief, and relief was all he got.

- Test: God gives mercy to the one who confesses and forsakes. Pharaoh did the first and never tried the second.

- Outcome: David, the prodigal son and the dying thief said "I have sinned" and found blessing. Pharaoh, Saul and Judas said it and perished. Same words, different heart.

Exodus 10:17 · Darby

And now, forgive, I pray you, my sin only this time, and intreat Jehovah your God that he may take away from me this death only!

The locusts have stripped Egypt bare, and Pharaoh calls for Moses and Aaron in a hurry. He names his sin, asks pardon "only this once," and begs for the plague to go — but is saying the right words the same as meaning them?

Words spoken under pressure

This is not the first time Pharaoh has admitted fault.

Pharaoh had once said, "I have sinned" (9:27). He said it now again. But confession under fear, what is it worth? "I have sinned against the Lord your God, and against you" (10:16-17). In this there was no conscience work, no real repentance. He desired the removal of God's hand from his land; that was all. It was removed. But his heart remained as hard as ever.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Confessing without forsaking

Admitting a wrong and leaving it are two different acts. Pharaoh does only the first.

He is the classic example of the sinner who defies God. Yet he is quite ready to look humble, if that lets him escape the punishment he deserves. We have to remember this word: "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy" (Prov. 28:13). Under chastisement Pharaoh did not mind doing a little bit of confessing, but he had no idea of forsaking his self-willed way. His fine words in verses 16 and 17 were only an effort to avoid further punishment.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Sorrow over the damage, not over the sin

Pharaoh wants "this death" taken away — the ruin in his fields. One writer describes a second kind of sorrow that never goes further than that.

The second is the sorrow that goes with the fear of the consequences, and not because of the hatefulness of the sin itself. This experience is selfish through and through. It is not godly grief, which produces a repentance leading to salvation without regret. It is worldly grief, and that produces death (2 Cor. 7:10). In this sorrow the devil seems very near. He mocks the soul in its distress and adds to its fears, while the soul vows again and again to avoid that trap in future, if only it can escape the consequences. He can mock with confidence. He knows that while the soul stays self-centred, it will go back to that same weakness, as the dog returns to its vomit.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

What his own plea admitted

Pharaoh asks Moses to pray. That plea grants what he once denied — this God, and no other, can lift the plague.

God had now sent eight plagues, and this last one was dreadful... Could Pharaoh still say, "Who is the Lord? I do not know the Lord"? What an answer he had already received. The Lord he did not know had power over the waters, power over the ground, power over people and animals, and power over the air. In what area of the natural world was He not supreme? He could foretell the plagues. He could bring the plagues. He alone could remove the plagues. He did what the idols could not.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The same words on other lips

Very different people have said the same words. The heart behind them, not the phrase, decided the outcome.

But others have said, "I have sinned," and it came to nothing; for God reads the heart, and He knows the motive of the creature. Pharaoh could say, "This time I have sinned" (Ex. 9:27), when the thunder and hail alarmed him and he wanted them gone. Yet he had not repented. Once the mighty thunder stopped, he sinned still more and hardened his heart. He confessed the same a second time, after the locusts destroyed all the plants the hail had spared. But his only aim was to get rid of that plague (Ex. 10:16-17). Saul said to Samuel, "I have sinned." Yet he gave away the state of his heart when he added, "Yet honor me now before the elders of my people and before Israel" (1 Sam. 15:30).

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Where the words are meant

Set against Pharaoh's bargaining is David, who said far less and received everything.

"I have sinned against the Lord." It was a short, real, solemn confession. David admitted that he was in God's hands and deserved only death for his offences. "The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die," was the prophet Nathan's immediate and reassuring reply... There was nothing for him but the sovereign mercy of God. Could that mercy reach him? God did not leave him in doubt for a moment.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Pressure. Pharaoh speaks only because the locusts have ruined Egypt. Ask what a confession made under fear is worth before you trust it.

- Words. He confesses, but he does not forsake. He will look humble to escape punishment, but he will not give up his own way.

- Relief. Grief that hates the damage instead of the sin is selfish. It goes back to the same sin once the pressure lifts.

- Motive. God reads the heart, not the sentence. Pharaoh and Saul said the same words as David and gained nothing.

- Mercy. David's short, real confession met an immediate answer: his sin put away, his life spared.

Exodus 10:18 · Darby

And he went out from Pharaoh, and intreated Jehovah.

Locusts have stripped Egypt bare, and Pharaoh calls back the two men he had driven out. He admits he has sinned and begs them to pray — so Moses goes out and prays for a king whose repentance will not last.

Prayer offered, prayer heard

Pharaoh asks for one thing, and Moses takes it to the Lord.

Under the pressure of this heavy blow, Pharaoh once again summoned Moses and Aaron into his presence. He confessed his sin against the Lord their God and against them, begged forgiveness, and asked them to plead with the Lord their God "only to remove this death from me." The Lord heard the intercession of Moses, and He removed the locusts and cast them into the Red Sea.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

God listens to a plea He can see through

The men Pharaoh had thrown out are called back in haste. God is not fooled by the humble words, yet He answers — and one writer notes where the locusts ended up, and who would end up there soon after.

Pharaoh hurried to call back Moses and Aaron, whom he had driven from his presence a few days before. He took a humble attitude. He confessed he had sinned, and he asked for a forgiveness that would include lifting the punishment. The Lord knew his heart, yet He listened to his plea. By a strong west wind He removed the locusts, so that not one was left. The locusts drowned in the Red Sea. Not many days later Pharaoh and his armies drowned there too.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Confession under fear

Pharaoh's words sounded right. He had used them once before.

Pharaoh had once said, "I have sinned." He said it now again. But confession under fear — what is it worth? … In this there was no work of conscience, no real repentance. He wanted God's hand removed from his land; that was all. It was removed. But his heart remained as hard as ever.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Another writer names the test: admitting the fault is not the same as leaving it.

He is the classic example of the sinner who defies God. Yet he is quite ready to adopt a humble attitude, if by it he may avoid reaping the punishment he deserves. We have to remember this word: "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy" (Proverbs 28:13). Under chastening Pharaoh did not mind doing a little confessing. But he had no intention of giving up his self-willed way.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why God lifts each blow at all

The lifting of the plague says something about God — and something about the man it leaves unchanged.

The stopping of each blow shows God's willingness to withdraw His hand from judgment. It shows judgment to be His strange work. Pharaoh hardens his heart not only by refusing to bow under the plagues. He hardens it by keeping on in his course after God answered his cry and lifted the plague. So neither God's severity in sending the plague nor His goodness in removing it touches such a man. His heart is fully set in him to do evil.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The patience that answers anyway

So why does God answer at all? One writer points to what God wants for the sinner.

It is beautiful to notice God's tender ways of grace, even with a hardened sinner. If there is even the slightest turning of heart to Him, He is ready to hear — though He knows it is not real. This is a striking testimony that He does not want the sinner to die. Indeed, He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. (2 Peter 3:9)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Relief asked. Pharaoh wanted the plague gone, not his sin gone. God's hand off his land was all he was after.

- Relief prayed for. Moses went straight out and interceded for the king who had just driven him from the palace.

- Relief granted. God knew the heart behind the plea and answered anyway. He is ready to hear at the slightest turning toward Him.

- Relief complete. Not one locust was left. The same sea that swallowed the swarm drowned Pharaoh and his armies days later.

- Relief wasted. Neither God's severity in sending the blow nor His goodness in lifting it moved a heart set on evil. Mercy that is not met with forsaking only hardens.

Exodus 10:19 · Darby

And Jehovah turned a very powerful west wind, which took away the locusts, and drove them into the Red Sea there remained not one locust in all the borders of Egypt.

The locusts came on one wind, and now God turns another wind to sweep them into the sea. Two questions follow: what moved God to lift His hand, and what did the relief do to Pharaoh?

The wind is God's servant

Egypt worshipped many gods, including gods of the air and the wind. Both the plague and its removal ran on the wind.

In the last two plagues God used the air and the wind to work His will. The locust obeys the wind. Egypt's deities of air and wind were set aside, as had been their deities of earth and water. The plague of the locusts, together with that of the hail, destroyed the sacred trees of the land. People prayed to these trees for help at harvest time. Everyone, from the highest to the lowest, bowed to the sycamore and gave it a tribute of the fruits of the earth.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

God listens to a plea He knows is hollow

Pharaoh's plea was not sincere, and God answered it anyway. One writer sees God's grace at work here, even toward a hardened man.

It is beautiful to notice God's tender ways of grace, even with a hardened sinner. If there is the slightest turning of heart to Him, He is ready to hear, even though He knows it is not real. This is a striking testimony that He does not will the sinner's death. Indeed, He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. (2 Peter 3:9.)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Where the locusts ended up

The verse names where the locusts ended up — the Red Sea. What that sea did to the insects, it later did to the king.

Pharaoh took a humble tone. He confessed that he had sinned, and he asked for a forgiveness that would also take away the punishment. The Lord knew his heart, yet He listened to his plea. By a strong west wind He removed the locusts so completely that not one was left. The locusts were drowned in the Red Sea. Not many days after Pharaoh and his hosts were drowned there too.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

"I have sinned" — said twice, meant neither time

This was not the first time Pharaoh said those words.

Pharaoh had once said, "I have sinned" (9:27). He said it now again. But confession under fear, what is it worth? In this there was no work of conscience, no real repentance. He wanted God's hand off his land; that was all. It was removed. But his heart remained as hard as ever.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

What was missing from his confession

Confession is only half the test. A second word must stand beside it.

He gives us the classic example of the sinner who defies God. Yet he is quite ready to look humble if that way he can avoid reaping the punishment he deserves. We have to remember this word: "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy" (Prov. 28:13). Under chastening Pharaoh did not mind doing a little bit of confessing, but he had no idea of forsaking his self-willed way. The fair words he spoke in verses 16 and 17 of our chapter were merely an effort to avoid further punishment.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Relief, then a harder heart

The relief did not set Israel free. Mercy and hardening stand side by side here.

Moses prayed for Egypt, and God again gave relief. He sent a very strong west wind that carried all the locusts away and drowned them in the Red Sea (v. 19). However, in His sovereign government God hardened Pharaoh's heart so that he still refused to allow Israel to leave.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The same story repeats far from Egypt.

Many a sinner has been brought by sudden sickness down to the door of death, and he has cried aloud for mercy. God heard his prayer and restored him to health. But instead of giving himself to the service of God, as he thought and intended, he returns to his old course of forgetfulness and sin.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Wind — the locusts came on one wind and left on another. The air Egypt worshipped carried out God's will, and the plague stripped Egypt's sacred trees bare.

- Mercy — God answered a plea He knew was insincere. He is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

- Completeness — God removed the locusts so completely that not one was left in all Egypt.

- Grave — the sea that swallowed the locusts swallowed Pharaoh and his army a few days later. The place of his relief became the place of his ruin.

- Test — Pharaoh confessed but never forsook, so the mercy only hardened him. Whoever confesses and forsakes will obtain mercy.

Exodus 10:20 · Darby

And Jehovah made Pharaoh's heart stubborn, and he did not let the children of Israel go.

The eighth plague is over: the locusts are gone from Egypt, yet Pharaoh's answer stays the same. The last line of the chapter raises a hard question: if the LORD hardened Pharaoh's heart, how was Pharaoh still to blame?

Where the Hardening Begins

The objection is a fair one: how can God punish a man for a resistance He Himself put there? One writer answers by pointing to where these words come in the story:

Satan would raise a doubt here: where was the sin of Pharaoh, if his heart was hardened like this? Or how could God justly destroy a man He had hardened to resist Him? If people had noticed where these words come in the story, the difficulty would have disappeared... Note then that God does not say this of Pharaoh until after Pharaoh had scornfully rejected the claims of the LORD. He had said, "Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice and let Israel go? I do not know the LORD, and moreover, I will not let Israel go." He rejected the word of the LORD. He set himself in open opposition to Him and to His people. Now God hardens his heart as an act of judgment. And God still acts on the same principle... God has fixed a limit to His day of grace, as He did for Pharaoh; and once that limit is passed, nothing remains but judgment.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A Real Act, Not a Figure of Speech

Some read the words to mean only that Pharaoh hardened himself while God watched. One writer insists the sealing up is God's own act, and that it comes after a refused testimony:

Man gives himself up to unbelief. Then God may seal that person up in a judicial hardness — at that time or later, as His own wisdom decides. This is a distinct, positive act on God's part. So I hold very firmly that the hardening is not only on man's side. In the judicial sense it is not man's act at all, though it is certainly the result of man's sin. God hardens because man refuses His word... That is how it was with Pharaoh. His case is the model one: the lasting warning in the New Testament, and the first named instance in the Old. At the same time, it is never God who makes a man an unbeliever.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Whole Book Says

Exodus does not tell this one way only. One writer counted every mention of the hardening in the book, and the count answers any one-sided reading:

There are nineteen passages in Exodus before us. All the authorities agree that nine of them trace the hardening of Pharaoh to the will of the LORD... So, to sum up: nine times the hardening of Pharaoh is traced to the Lord. One more speaks of the Egyptians in general. Four times it is traced to Pharaoh himself, and five times the text does not say who did it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Sorry for the Consequences, Not the Sin

Just before this, Pharaoh had admitted his sin and begged for relief. The moment the locusts left, the real man showed again:

Pharaoh's heart now seemed softened, but it really was not. As soon as the plague left, he went back to his stubborn resistance. As predicted, the LORD had hardened his heart. He gives us the classic example of the sinner who defies God. Yet he is quite ready to act humble, if that will help him escape the punishment he deserves. We have to remember this word: "Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy" (Prov. 28:13). Under chastening, Pharaoh did not mind a little confessing. But he had no thought of forsaking his self-willed way.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Stubbornness Turned to God's Account

So Pharaoh's stubbornness never defeated God's purpose. It served it:

A creature resisting its Creator! The human will overcoming the divine will! That could not be... Generations not yet born were to hear of the works of the LORD, and of how He stepped in for Israel. They were to know that He is the LORD. Egypt's stubbornness would only help to display the glory of God.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Two Truths Held Together

One writer holds both sides together — God's electing grace and man's own fault — and draws this conclusion:

In the end we may hold this as certain. Those who are saved are saved by grace, through the electing love of God. And those who are lost, in the very place where that grace is at work, are lost by their own fault.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal first. Pharaoh said he did not know the LORD and would not obey Him. Only after that does the text speak of God hardening him. The order carries the answer.

- Then hardening. God's own hand then seals the man up in the hardness he chose. It is a distinct act, and it comes after the refusal.

- Then testing. The locusts left, and his confession vanished with them. He confessed without forsaking, and that is the mark of a heart untouched.

- Then glory. His stubbornness did not defeat God's purpose. It became the story fathers told their children and grandchildren.

- Then the warning. Those saved are saved by grace; those lost, standing in the very place where grace is at work, are lost by their own fault.