Esther 3:5–6

Esther 3:5

And when Haman saw that Mordecai bowed not, nor did him reverence, Haman was full of fury.

Everyone in the courtyard bends. One man stays upright. The moment Haman notices, a private insult turns into a plan to kill a whole nation. Why would a court official risk his life over a bow? And why did that refusal enrage the second most powerful man in the empire?

The man who demanded the bow

Haman's title, "the Agagite", carries an old history. It ties him to a people God had already marked out:

Haman was the son of Hammedatha the Agagite... That means Haman was an Amalekite. This explains why Mordecai refused to bow down before Haman. He belonged to the race that Jehovah had sworn to fight for ever, and that Saul was told to wipe out completely. Ex. 17:16; Deut. 25:19; 1 Sam. 15:3.

Morrish Bible Dictionary

That history changes how his refusal looks:

Here then was Mordecai's authority for refusing a single nod of his head to the Agagite. How could a faithful member of the house of Israel bow to a member of a house with which Jehovah was at war? Impossible... People might accuse him of arrogance, blind stubbornness, stupid bigotry, and contemptible narrow-mindedness. But that was not his concern at all... The apparent folly was simple obedience.

C. H. Mackintosh

What the bow would have meant

The honour asked of the king's servants was more than politeness in that court:

All the king's servants bowed down and paid him homage. They gave him the honour due to a god. Almost all these Eastern rulers claimed to be divine... Haman received this worship as the king's representative. But Mordecai did not bow down. Such homage meant recognising a false god, and it went against the commandment of God... All around him the servants bow low in worship before Haman, while Mordecai the Jew stands upright.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

One thorn among many honours

Haman had everything the empire could give. One man's straight back spoiled it all:

Ahasuerus advances this noble to the very highest place. But among all his piled-up honours there was one thorn! Mordecai did not bow. As a result, Mordecai became a target of blame.

William Kelly

One writer sets Haman's anger beside other outbursts in Scripture and names their shared root:

...seen in the wicked Haman, and leading to the attempted destruction of an entire people. The same cause, PRIDE, filled Nebuchadnezzar with rage and fury. His face changed (like Cain's). It led to INTENSE CRUELTY against his victims — cruelty that God overruled by a miracle.

A. T. Schofield

The reason nobody in the story names

The book of Esther never mentions God, and the deepest cause of this quarrel is never stated aloud either:

There was the secret. God does not appear. There is no hint in the history that God had spoken about Haman! Yet here was the secret reason; but the only public reason that appears is that Mordecai was a Jew.

William Kelly

Rage that could not stop at one man

One death was not enough for Haman. One writer compares his fury to that of a later enemy:

Haman's fury against a man who despises him and refuses his yoke knows no limits. It is like the fury of the Antichrist against those who will not acknowledge his power and authority, and who refuse to wear his mark on their forehead and hands. But he would have scorned to put Mordecai alone to death. He must strike him down together with all his people.

H. L. Rossier

Another writer points to a greater refusal of the same kind:

Mordecai, however, refuses to bow before Haman (verse 2). The Lord refused to bow before Satan when He was tempted. The faithful remnant will refuse to bow before the triad of evil too, and many will pay for this with their lives.

Michael Hardt

What one man's stand accomplished

The last word here is not Haman's rage but the worth of one person's faithfulness:

Does this not strongly encourage us to stand for the truth of God, whatever it costs? Just look at the wonderful results that came from the actions of one man! Many might have condemned Mordecai's conduct. Refusing a simple mark of respect to the highest noble in the empire might have looked like senseless stubbornness. But it was not so. It was simple obedience.

C. H. Mackintosh

Summary

- Refusal — Mordecai's straight back was obedience, not rudeness. The honour Haman demanded belonged to God. And Haman came from a house God had sworn to fight.

- Rage — Wounded pride filled Haman. The same root produced Nebuchadnezzar's fury and Cain's changed face, and it drove Haman to cruelty against a whole people.

- Reason — In public, the reason was that Mordecai was a Jew. The real reason is never stated, just as God Himself is never named in the book.

- Reach — Killing one man was beneath Haman, so he aimed at the nation; writers see here the pattern of a later fury against all who refuse the Antichrist's mark.

- Result — One man's plain obedience looked like folly at the time. Yet great results followed from it, and it still calls us to stand for the truth of God whatever it costs.

Esther 3:6

But he scorned to lay hands on Mordecai alone; for they had made known to him the people of Mordecai; therefore Haman sought to destroy all the Jews that were in all the kingdom of Ahasuerus -- the people of Mordecai.

Mordecai would not bow to Haman, and Haman would not settle for punishing one man. So this verse asks two questions: why did one man's pride reach so far, and what older quarrel lay underneath it?

The reason given and the reason hidden

The story gives one reason on the surface: Mordecai was a Jew. A commentator points out that the deeper reason is never said out loud.

There was the secret. God does not appear. Nothing in the story hints that God had spoken about Haman! Yet here was the secret reason; but the only public reason that appears is that Mordecai was a Jew.

William Kelly

The Agagite

That hidden reason sits in Haman's family name: the Agagite. It explains why Mordecai would not bow.

Haman was the son of Hammedatha the Agagite. Fürst says that Josephus explains Haman's national name as meaning Amalekite by race, and Jewish tradition says the same. That is, Haman was an Amalekite. This explains why Mordecai refused to bow down before Haman. He belonged to the race with which Jehovah had sworn to have war forever, the race Saul had orders to destroy completely. Ex. 17:16; Deut. 25:19; 1 Sam. 15:3.

Morrish Bible Dictionary

Pride that will not settle for one victim

The verse says Haman "disdained" to touch Mordecai alone. One writer traces that scorn back to how well life had gone for him.

He came from the true seed of Amalek. The Lord had a quarrel with Amalek forever. Long ago, in the earliest days of Israel's history, Amalek defied God's glory just as it began to shine out in the bleak desert. (Ex. 17) He had prospered in a remarkable way. He had the ear, the hand, and the ring of his master, the Persian (the greatest monarch on earth) at his command. Because of all this, his pride could not take a refusal. If the servant of God will not worship, then the whole nation of God's people must pay the penalty.

The Christian's Friend

An old war, still running

One writer looks past Haman to the enemy using him, and to what that enemy was after.

The people are captive now. Their unfaithfulness has brought them to the lowest point of humiliation. So Satan stirs up Haman the Agagite to wipe out the weak remnant of this people. And let us not forget his hidden purpose: to take Israel away from Christ, their king according to the counsels and promises of God. Could there be a deceitful plan more satanic than that? Satan is frustrated in his efforts, as this book teaches us, but he does not consider himself beaten. He attacks the very Leader of Israel, Christ. At His birth, he attempts to put Him to death, by means of a new Agag, in the massacre at Bethlehem.

H. L. Rossier

Why a scattered people draws hatred

Haman went after a whole people, not one man. One commentator says that kind of hatred outlives Persia.

God's people, just because they are His, are always an offence to the rest of mankind — above all to the proud and boastful. This stays true even when their unfaithfulness costs them His open favour, as it had in fact done here.

William Kelly

A death sentence that gets reversed

Haman's rage did not stop at feeling. One writer follows it into law, and then to what undid it.

Haman is furious and decides to persecute not Mordecai only, but his entire people (v. 5-6). He accuses the Jewish people before the king, and stands exposed as "the Jews' enemy" (v. 10; cf. 8:1; 9:10, 24) – all of which matters in relation to Satan and his agents (cf. Rev. 12:4, 10). The king then ratifies his plan by a royal decree: all Jews must die (v. 12-15). This pictures a divine death sentence on the Jewish nation. How good to know that the king later passes a second decree which overturns the first. The sentence of death turns into life and peace.

Michael Hardt

Commentators differ in emphasis. Some read Haman as the proud man ruined by his own pride. Others read him as a picture of the enemy of God's people in every age.

Summary

- One man. Mordecai stayed on his feet, and that is the only cause the book states. The older reason, Israel's ancient war with Amalek, is never said out loud.

- One grudge. All Haman held from the empire counted for nothing while one servant of God refused to worship him. So he made the whole nation pay.

- One war. Behind the Agagite stands an old hatred. It began in the desert and aimed, in the end, at taking Israel away from Christ.

- One offence. God's people offend the world because they are His. That stays true even when they have lost His open favour.

- One reversal. The decree of death is not the last word. A second decree turns the sentence into life and peace.