Then were the king's scribes called, in the first month, on the thirteenth day of the [month], and there was written according to all that Haman commanded unto the king's satraps, and to the governors over every province, and to the princes of every people; to every province according to the writing thereof, and to every people according to their language in the name of king Ahasuerus was it written, and sealed with the king's ring.
Haman holds the king's ring, and now the king's scribes write whatever he commands. On the thirteenth day of the first month, one man's hatred becomes the fixed law of an empire.
The verse reads like paperwork: officials, provinces, scripts, languages. One commentator walks through the steps that turned Haman's wish into a law nobody could undo:
Leslie M. GrantThe king's scribes were then called to write a decree "according to all that Haman commanded." It was addressed to all the officials of the kingdom in every province and sealed with the king's signet (v. 12). Couriers then carried these letters to all the king's provinces. They told the people to kill and destroy all the Jews — young and old, women and children — on one set day, and to take all their possessions as plunder. Haman took the fullest advantage of the king's permission. He had copies of the document sent everywhere (v. 14), declaring this slaughter to be law. That law could not be changed, because the Medes and Persians prided themselves on having unchangeable laws (Dan. 6:8).
The decree carries two things that are not Haman's: the king's name and the king's seal. A later letter in the book carries the same two marks. Comparing them shows what the seal meant:
W. H. WestcottEsther 3:12 and Esther 8:8 hold two letters of King Ahasuerus. The first was written under Haman's influence and scheming, calling on men to rise up against the Jews and wipe them out. The second was written under Mordecai's guidance, authorising the Jews to destroy anyone who dared to lay hands on them. Both letters were written in the king's name and sealed with the king's ring, and neither was cancelled. No man may reverse a writing that carries the king's name and the king's seal. So the sealing stood for the settled, unchangeable purpose and will of the one whose seal it was. No man could reverse it.
The order goes out "to every province in its own script and every people in its own language." No Jew anywhere could say the law had not reached him.
C E StuartThe decree they read. It was written, it was sealed with the king's signet — no man could reverse it. Who could bring comfort to those affected by it? A Persian had no fear of death because of it; it did not touch him. Once it was published, no Jew inside the king's lands had any hope of life. He could go from one end of the empire to the other, and no corner, no hidden spot, was safe for him. The decree aimed at the whole race. So the Jew was born into this world under a threat of death.
Everything in the letter is Haman's; nothing in it bears his name. One commentator sees the same arrangement returning at the end of days:
H. L. RossierHaman writes "in the name of King Ahasuerus," and in appearance acts as his humble servant in affairs that the king himself has resolved and decreed. Similar circumstances will be renewed at the time of the end. The Antichrist will make himself the servant of the Roman Beast (Rev. 13:14-16) to carry out his own plans. Haman's satanic plan begins with his own pride and ambition. He would rather crush everything under his feet than see it made subject to Christ.
Haman used the lot to pick his day, and the lot gave him the twelfth month — eleven months away. That delay left room for the steps that undid him.
F. B. HoleHaman had power, and he was full of anger at Mordecai's lack of respect. He decided to destroy not Mordecai alone but all his people. So he cast lots to find "the lucky day." The lots were cast in the first month of the year, and they pointed to a day as late as the thirteenth day of the twelfth month. That left ample time for the various steps that brought down both his plan and himself (3:7 and 13).
No one ever cancels the decree of verse 12. A second decree answers it, and one commentator sees in that a picture of the nation's standing before God:
Michael HardtHis plan is ratified by a royal decree according to which all Jews must die (v. 12-15). This illustrates that there is a divine death sentence on the Jewish nation. How good to know that — as we will see — the king later passes a second decree which overturns the first. The sentence of death becomes life and peace.
- Written. Hatred in Haman's heart could kill no one. Written out by the king's scribes, it became law.
- Sealed. The king's ring marked a settled will. What it stamped could not be taken back, so rescue had to come as a second decree, not as a cancelled first one.
- Sent. Copies went to every province in its own script and language. No Jew in the empire stood outside the sentence.
- Delayed. The lot Haman trusted gave him a date eleven months away. That gap left room for the steps that destroyed him.
- Reversed. Chapter 3 leaves a death sentence over the nation. By chapter 8 a second letter, with the same name and the same ring, turns it into life and peace.
And the letters were sent by couriers into all the king's provinces, to destroy, to kill, and to cause to perish, all Jews, both young and old, little children and women, in one day, upon the thirteenth of the twelfth month, that is, the month Adar, and [to take] the spoil of them for a prey.
Here Haman's private grudge becomes imperial law. Couriers carry sealed letters into every province, and one day is named for the killing of a whole people. Why was the day set so far off? And what can a people do when the law itself says they must die?
after
Haman's own words became a law of the empire, and no one could undo it.
after
The king's scribes were then called to write a decree "according to all that Haman commanded." It was addressed to all the officials of the kingdom in every province, and sealed with the king's signet (v. 12)... Haman had taken fullest advantage of the king's permission. He had copies of the document sent everywhere (v. 14), declaring this slaughter as law. That law could not be changed, for the Medes and Persians prided themselves on laws that could never be altered (Dan. 6:8).
after
The order was written on a day whose Persian name meant "lot", and it reached every people in its own language.
after
An empire-wide proclamation went out, a real proclamation of death. The king's scribes were called on the 13th day of the month. Research has shown that the Persians called that day Tir, which means "lot." The message went out in different languages to all the king's satraps, to the governors of every province, and to the princes of every people joined to the Persian empire. It told them what was to happen on the 13th day of the month Adar.
after
The man dictating these letters is drawn as more than an offended official.
He is marked by uncontrollable pride and by the desire to lift himself up and make himself a god. He is filled with terrible hatred against the people of God and against the one who represents them. To take revenge on that one man, the enemy sacrifices the whole nation. He also uses lies and hellish cunning to get what he wants: murder. In a word, he is the spirit of wickedness in the flesh. Is he not the same one who says, "Come, let us wipe them out as a nation; let the name of Israel be remembered no more!"? (Ps. 83:4)
after
after
Haman cast lots to pick his day, and the day he got undid him.
after
So the enemy cast lots to find a day that suited his murderous plan. God's providence saw to it that the lot fell far ahead. That delay left room for a new decree, since the old one could not be changed or cancelled, so that the Jews could stand and defend themselves and destroy their enemies. At first nothing looked less likely. In the end Satan, as always, defeated himself.
after
The sorrow that spread had a deeper cause than one man's hatred.
after
The king's decree, the written word, stood in front of them. It would not be changed. It had to be carried out, unless some way of rescue was found in time. Haman's hatred on its own would have caused no sorrow. The decree of death made all the difference, because it came from the man who held the power to kill.
after
Birth alone put a person under the sentence, and no comfort could reach him.
after
A Persian had no fear of death because of it; it did not touch him. A Jew anywhere in the king's lands had no hope of life once it was published. He could go from one end of the empire to the other, and there was no corner, no hidden spot, where he was safe.
after The decree was aimed against the race. So simply by being born into this world, the Jew found himself threatened with death... Had anyone tried to cheer him, how could it be done? "It is written" would have been the poor man's answer.
The chapter closes with two men at ease over the doom they have just posted.
C E StuartHaman succeeded in getting a royal decree for the destruction of all the Jews found in the kingdom of Ahasuerus. His work for that day was done. The scribes were busy; the couriers went out, hurried on by the king's commandment. Then Ahasuerus and Haman sat down to their drinking. What is man! Those two, as far as they were concerned, had sealed the doom of a whole people by the decree that was being published; then, with light hearts, they sat down to drink! (3:15).
A second proclamation later followed this one, and the Jews had to believe both.
after
But faith was necessary for the Jews. They had to believe the second proclamation as they had believed the first. It would have gone badly for them if the thirteenth day of the month Adar came and they had not acted on the second decree. The first decree would then have fallen on their heads, and they would have died. So the sinner must believe the first decree: death is his sentence as a sinner. Then he must believe the second decree, "Christ died for the sins of the ungodly." There is life in a look to the crucified One.
after
- Written. One sealed law, sent out in every language, set a single day for killing every Jew. Persian law could not be changed.
after
- Hated. Behind the writing stands pride and hatred of God's people. One man's wounded pride is paid for by a whole nation.
after
- Deferred. The lot set the day far ahead. That delay left room for a second decree, so the enemy's own method defeated him.
after
- Helpless. "It is written" ended every comfort. Nowhere in the empire was safe, because the sentence fell on the race, not on what anyone had done.
after
- Answered. The first decree still stood, but a second one came. The Jews lived by believing both — as the sinner believes the sentence of death, and then believes that Christ died.
after
That the decree might be given in every province, a copy of the writing was published to all peoples, that they should be ready against that day.
Haman's order to destroy the Jews was not whispered; it was published. Scribes copied it, couriers carried it, and every province knew the date almost a year in advance — so what hope was left?
The copies went to every level of government, in the languages people spoke.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinHere we see great activity. An empire-wide proclamation went out, a true proclamation of death. The king's scribes were called on the 13th day of the month… All the king's satraps (his provincial rulers), the governors of every province, and the princes of every people who had joined themselves to the Persian empire received notice, in different languages, of what was to happen on the 13th day of the month Adar. The proclamation was written in the king's name and sealed with his ring, which Haman held.
Publishing the text did more than inform. It made the killing legal, and Persian law did not change.
Leslie M. GrantHaman took the fullest advantage of the king's permission. He had copies of the document sent everywhere (v. 14), declaring this slaughter to be law. That law could not be changed, for the Medes and Persians took pride in having laws that never altered (Dan. 6:8).
The decree named one people out of many. One writer sees a hostility here that is not peculiar to Persia.
William KellyGod's people, just because they are His, are always an offence to the rest of mankind, and above all to the proud and boastful. This holds true even when their own unfaithfulness costs them His open favour, which is what had happened here… So Haman proposes their destruction, offering a round sum for the treasury in return.
Why would an enemy with full power fix a date eleven months away? The lot chose it, and one writer reads that choice as no accident.
H. L. RossierThe lot points to the twelfth month for the massacre of the Jews. Why not the third or the fourth month, to take away any chance of escape from this oppressed people? Is this not once again hidden Providence, directing everything as always? What can the "oppressor of the Jews" (Esther 9:10, 24) do against the secret counsels of Providence? He must obey the lot he has consulted, and right there his quick road to death and judgment begins.
Kelly points to what that long delay left room for.
William KellyDivine providence saw to it that the day was put off long enough to make room for a fresh decree — since changing or cancelling the first was not allowed — so that the Jews could stand in self-defence and destroy their enemies. At first nothing looked less likely; in the end Satan, as always, defeated himself.
Ordinary people could read their own death date. One writer pictures what that did to them.
C E StuartThe written decree! What a change it made! The goals and aims that had taken up so much of their lives until then must have looked different — and, may we say it, truer. A Persian had no fear of death because of it; it did not touch him. A Jew had no hope of life once it was published, if he lived anywhere in the king's realm. He could go from one end of the empire to the other, and in no corner, in no hidden place, was he safe. The decree was aimed at the race. So by birth alone the Jew found himself under threat of death… It is written would have been the poor man's answer. It is written must have crushed all hope.
A second decree followed the first, carried to the same provinces. The Jews' mood changed while the first decree still stood.
C E StuartPerplexity gave way to gladness; feasting took the place of fasting. Why? The thirteenth of Adar had not yet come. The first decree stood unrepealed. Why this change? The written word of that second decree had made all the difference. Relief had come; a way of escape from that dreadful doom was offered the Jews. They believed it, and they acted as if they believed it.
- Written — scribes drafted the order and the king's ring sealed it. That made it law, not a threat.
- Published — copies went to every province in every language. The whole empire knew the date in advance.
- Unchangeable — Persian law could not be revoked. No appeal was left; only a second decree could bring relief.
- Delayed — the lot pushed the day eleven months out. Writers read that gap as hidden providence working against Haman.
- Answered — a second written word travelled as far as the first. It turned mourning into gladness before the dreaded day arrived.
The couriers went out, being hastened by the king's commandment, and the decree was given in Shushan the fortress. And the king and Haman sat down to drink; but the city of Shushan was in consternation.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.