Esther 3:10–11

Esther 3:10

And the king took his ring from his hand, and gave it to Haman the son of Hammedatha the Agagite, the Jews' enemy.

The king's signet ring changes hands here, and with it the power to turn one man's hatred into law. Scripture pauses to give the man who receives it a title: the enemy of the Jews. Behind that title lies a feud far older than the Persian court.

What the ring meant

A ring in that court was not jewellery. It was a working tool of government, and the king hands it to Haman.

Then the king gave him his ring. It was a ring to seal a document. Every ring had a seal. Handing over the king's ring with its seal handed over royal authority and power to the man who received it. So Haman now held royal authority. The haughtiness of the king appears now. Not only does he turn over his signet ring, but he also makes Haman a present of the enormous sum he had offered to the king. In cold blood Xerxes gives over this unknown people into the hands of this wicked enemy.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

"The Agagite"

The verse names Haman's family, and that name carries a history. Agag was the royal line of Amalek, a nation under a standing sentence from God.

Haman was the son of Hammedatha the Agagite. Josephus explains his foreign name by calling him an Amalekite by race, and Jewish tradition says the same. So Haman was an Amalekite. This explains why Mordecai refused to bow down before Haman. He belonged to the race the Lord had sworn to fight for ever, and which He told Saul to destroy completely. Ex. 17:16; Deut. 25:19; 1 Sam. 15:3.

Morrish Bible Dictionary

The enemy behind the enemy

One writer sees a long campaign behind Amalek. It runs from the desert years to Haman, and on to Bethlehem, with the same hidden aim throughout.

Without Moses' prayer on the mountain and without Joshua, he would have destroyed the people. David defeated him at last, yet even then he did not treat the fight as finished. Now the people are captive. Their unfaithfulness has brought them to the lowest point of humiliation. So Satan stirs up Haman the Agagite to wipe out the weak remnant of this people. And let us not forget his hidden purpose: to take Israel away from Christ, the king God had planned and promised. Could there be a more deceitful plan, a more satanic one, than that? This book teaches us that Satan is frustrated in his efforts, yet he does not consider himself beaten. He attacks Israel's very Leader, Christ. At His birth he tries to kill Him through a new Agag, in the massacre at Bethlehem.

H. L. Rossier

A king who never asked

The king hands over the ring without one question about the people he is condemning. He also misses what his adviser stood to gain.

The king ought to have realised that Haman had a personal axe to grind. Haman was ready to pay this huge sum out of his own pocket to have this people destroyed. But the king placed great confidence in this scheming Amalekite. Haman cared far more for his own reputation than for the Persian kingdom. The king therefore agreed, and gave Haman liberty to do just as he desired (vv. 10-11). It seems strange that the king consulted his princes about what to do with Queen Vashti (ch. 1:13-15). Yet in this far more serious case he acted like a dictator!

Leslie M. Grant

Why this people

Why did this hatred settle on this people? One writer names the reason underneath it, and the way such plots end.

Haman's plea to the king sounded plausible. God's people, just because they are His, are always an offence to the rest of mankind, and most of all to the proud and boastful. This stays true even when their own unfaithfulness has cost them His open favour, as it had here… At first, that ending looked the least likely of all; in the end Satan, as always, defeated himself.

William Kelly

A decree that did not stand

The title given to Haman here follows him through the rest of the book. But the decree he seals with this ring does not get the last word.

Haman accuses the Jewish people before the king, and this verse names him "the enemy of the Jews" (v. 10; cf. 8:1; 9:10, 24). All of it matters for what we learn about Satan and his agents (cf. Rev. 12:4, 10). A royal decree then makes his plan law: every Jew must die (v. 12-15)… How good to know that the king later passes a second decree which overturns the first. That second decree turns a sentence of death into life and peace.

Michael Hardt

Summary

- The ring — the signet stamped documents and made them law. Giving it away gave away royal authority, and Haman now acts with the king's own power.

- The hand that takes it — Haman is an Agagite, from Amalek's royal line. God had sworn lasting war on that nation, and the old feud is why Mordecai would not bow.

- The hand that gives it — a king who asked nothing and checked nothing, and made a gift of the silver too. He took advice about his queen, but not about the life of a whole nation.

- The hatred underneath — God's people offend the proud just because they are His. That stays true even when their unfaithfulness has cost them His open favour.

- The reversal — the king later issues a second decree that overturns the first. The sentence of death becomes life and peace.

Esther 3:11

And the king said to Haman, The silver is given to thee, the people also, to do with them as seems good to thee.

The king's answer costs him nothing: he gives away his ring, waves off the money, and hands a whole people to a man who hates them. Everything that follows in the book flows from this careless moment.

The Ring

The ring was not a personal keepsake. It stamped the empire's decisions as genuine, so handing it over handed over the power itself.

Then the king gave him his ring. It was a ring for sealing a document. Every ring had a seal. Handing over the royal ring with the royal seal meant handing over royal authority and power to the person who received it. Haman was therefore invested with royal authority. The haughtiness of the king now appears. Not only does he hand over his signet ring, but he also makes Haman a present of the enormous sum he had offered to the king. In cold blood Xerxes gives this unknown people over into the hands of this wicked enemy.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

A King Who Would Not Look

Refusing Haman's money may look like restraint. It shows something else: the people meant so little to him that he did not even want paying for them.

Ahasuerus refuses the silver and hands the people over to Haman, "to do with them as it seems good to [him]." What indifference, what a hardened heart we find in this king! The name of Israel has no significance for him. "Do with them as it seems good to you," he says — in other words, do evil and face no punishment!

H. L. Rossier

One writer notes that the offer itself should have made the king suspicious.

Surely the king ought to have realised that Haman had a personal axe to grind. He was ready to pay this huge amount himself to have this people destroyed. But the king clearly had great confidence in this scheming Amalekite, who cared far more for his own reputation than for the Persian kingdom. So the king agreed, and gave Haman freedom to do just as he wanted. It seems strange that the king would consult with the princes about what to do with Vashti, but that here, in a far more serious case, he would act like a dictator!

Leslie M. Grant

The Hand Behind Haman

Commentators see more here than one man's grudge. One writer points to the power behind Haman, and to a hatred that had no cause at all.

Satan stirred up the Amalekite to a hatred that wanted God's fallen people wiped out. But He who loved them despite everything would give that hatred the punishment it deserved. It began without cause, against the very people He had openly favoured.

William Kelly

Power Borrowed, Not Owned

Haman now acts, but never in his own name. That makes his private revenge look like the king's own policy — and one writer sees the same pattern returning at the end.

Haman writes "in the name of king Ahasuerus," and appears to act as his humble servant in matters the king himself has decided and decreed. Similar circumstances will come round again at the time of the end. The Antichrist will make himself the servant of the Roman Beast (Rev. 13:14-16) to carry out his own plans. Haman's satanic scheme begins with the pride and ambition of this man. He would rather crush everything under his feet than see it all subject to Christ.

H. L. Rossier

The Plot That Undid Itself

Nothing in this chapter looks hopeful. Yet the plot carried its own defeat inside it.

Divine providence delayed the outcome long enough to allow a fresh decree. The first one could not be changed or cancelled. The new decree let the Jews defend themselves and destroy their enemies. But at first no outcome looked less likely; in the end Satan, as always, defeated himself. Haman's argument to the king was plausible. God's people are always an offence to the rest of mankind, just because they are His. The proud and boastful hate them most. This stays true even when their own unfaithfulness costs them His open favour, which is what had happened here.

William Kelly

A Sentence Answered by a Second Decree

The whole nation is now under a legal death sentence. One writer draws out what the two decrees picture together.

Haman accuses the Jewish people before the king, and the book exposes him as "the Jews' enemy"... A royal decree then makes his plan law: all Jews must die. This pictures a divine death sentence on the Jewish nation. How good to know that — as we will see — the king later passes a second decree which overturns the first. The sentence of death turns into life and peace.

Michael Hardt

Summary

- Ring — the seal was royal authority itself. Giving it away turned Haman's private hatred into law.

- Indifference — the king refused the money because a whole people cost him nothing to give away.

- Enmity — behind Haman stands Satan, stirring a hatred with no cause against the people God had openly favoured.

- Borrowed name — Haman never acts as himself. He signs in the king's name, a pattern one writer expects to see again at the end.

- Reversal — the scheme defeated itself. A second decree turned the sentence of death into life and peace.