*I*, the prisoner in [the] Lord, exhort you therefore to walk worthy of the calling wherewith ye have been called,
Ephesians 4 turns from what God has done to how believers should live. Paul writes as a prisoner, and he pleads rather than orders — so what life could match such a calling?
The words "I therefore" reach back over a long pause. Paul had begun the same sentence in chapter 3 and then broke off to unfold the mystery entrusted to him.
Here we come to the practical part of the letter. Verse 1 refers back to the end of Ephesians 2. In Ephesians 3:1 the apostle began with, "For this reason I, Paul, a prisoner for Christ Jesus on behalf of you Gentiles." Then he went off into a long parenthesis, which runs to the end of the chapter. This is not unusual in his letters. Here he takes up the thread: "I therefore, a prisoner for the Lord, urge you..."
Chapter 2 had ended with believers built together as God's dwelling. That is the calling in view here.
The beginning of chapter 4 connects with the end of chapter 2. There we see that we are the habitation of God, the dwelling of God. This is the calling of which it says, "I... urge you to walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which you have been called." In such a position we are always humble. This is what enables us to walk worthy of the calling revealed.
Paul sat in prison because of the truth he had just explained: believing Gentiles and believing Jews form one body. He turns that cost into an appeal.
Now the apostle was in prison for the testimony he had borne to this truth. He had maintained and preached the privileges God had granted to the Gentiles. In particular, he preached that by faith they form, together with believing Jews, one body united to Christ. In his exhortation he uses this fact as a touching motive.
He urges; he does not order.
The order cannot be reversed. A worthy walk responds to a calling already given; it never earns one.
Christian duties (and there are such) flow from the new relationship formed by grace, and in Christ. We must first be in the relationship before the duties are there. People make a serious blunder here. They treat the duties as a way of getting into relationship with God... You cannot fulfil the duties of a child until you are one, or show the love of one either... God makes us His children, and then says, Now imitate your Father.
The same order shows in the word "saints."
God does not call them to become saints by a saintly walk. He urges them to a saintly walk because they are saints through His calling.
Paul uses the phrase three times, and each time the measure differs.
Paul urges us three times in his letters to "walk worthy." In 1 Thessalonians 2:12 we are to "walk in a manner worthy of God." He is the living and true God. God had called the Thessalonians to serve Him instead of idols. In Colossians 1:10 it is "walk in a manner worthy of the Lord, fully pleasing to Him." That letter dwells much on Christ's authority and headship. Here it is "worthy of the calling to which you have been called." Chapters 1 and 2 have unfolded that calling. It involves new nature and relationship, access to the Father, God's habitation in the Spirit, and union with the exalted Christ in one body.
The next verse turns in a surprising direction.
It is striking that he goes straight on to lowliness and meekness. This is the walk that is worthy of the calling. We would feel our own nothingness if we thought of this place... He has made us all one by the Spirit. We are all built together like stones in a house. He looks to us to walk in that unity and the spirit of peace.
But there is a false version of this.
The most humbling thing in the world is receiving boundless and undeserved favour... Now God never calls it lowliness and meekness to doubt the truth of His word, or the efficacy of Christ's work. On the contrary, He counts it pride and presumption.
- Calling first. Chapters 1–3 describe the calling. Chapter 4 describes the walk that answers to it.
- Therefore. The word links back to Ephesians 3:1. Behind it stands the end of chapter 2, where God builds believers together as His dwelling.
- Never reversed. Duties flow out of relationship; no one becomes a child of God by behaving like one.
- Worthy means matched. Elsewhere the measure is God Himself or the Lord. Here it is the calling — new relationship, access to the Father, union with Christ in one body.
- Downward, not upward. A calling this high begins with lowliness and meekness. It means feeling our own nothingness in the light of such grace.
with all lowliness and meekness, with long-suffering, bearing with one another in love;
Paul first describes what God has given. Then he turns to how that gift should look in daily life. He names four qualities: lowliness, meekness, patience, and forbearance in love. Commentators treat them as the test of a life worthy of God's calling.
The list is not a demand for effort out of nowhere. Writers trace it back to how close God has already brought us to Himself.
Paul unfolds the calling, and then calls on us to walk worthy of it, in the first part of chapter 4. God has brought us very close to Himself, and the necessary effect of that is lowliness and meekness. How could it be otherwise? The greatness of the grace makes nothing of self. This is not easy. You see it clearly in Christ's life, and in Philippians too.
The first two words are close in meaning. Commentators tell them apart by how each one behaves when friction comes.
What is the difference between lowliness and meekness? Lowliness does not give offense, and meekness does not take offense. Both are needed if we are not to quarrel with our brothers and sisters. Third comes long-suffering, and fourth, "bearing with one another in love." All four qualities are meant to help us live at peace with each other, and to carry the suffering others may cause us.
The order of the four is not accidental. Lowliness and meekness are what I bring. Patience is what I need when the other person brings something else.
Lowliness and meekness are to mark us: how else can we walk together? ... If we let self have its way, fellowship becomes impossible. Resentment and strife are sure to follow. But suppose that, while we display lowliness and meekness, we find others are not like that? Then comes the opportunity of exercising long-suffering and forbearance in love.
Paul does not simply say "bear with one another"; he adds in love. That addition is a safeguard, because it is possible to put up with someone while despising them.
We may have to put up with insults and rejection, and bear with those who treat us that way. But note the warning: this forbearance must be shown in love. It is possible to bear with much in the spirit of pride that treats an offending brother with contempt. If we have to be silent, let it be with love that grieves over unworthy conduct.
These are not abstract virtues. They are for one setting: life together in the church, where they get used every day.
The instructions in the first part of chapter 4, down to verse 16, have our calling in view. They speak to us not one by one, but as members of the body of Christ, the church. In the gatherings of the saints, how often friction occurs! A little experience of assembly life is enough to convince us that this is so. Here then is an immense field for cultivating the beautiful graces listed in verse 2.
These words sound like putting yourself down. So people twist them into something God never asked for. One writer warns against this.
Nothing is more fitting in a believer than "lowliness and meekness," but perhaps nothing is more misunderstood. In too many cases Satan's craft turns these beautiful graces into doubts. Those doubts dishonour God and destroy the believer's peace. God never calls it lowliness and meekness to doubt the truth of His word, or the effectiveness of Christ's work. On the contrary, He counts it pride and presumption.
The two words Paul opens with are the two Jesus used of Himself. Writers point to that link for our model.
Our blessed Lord rises before our eyes. He Himself says, "I am gentle and lowly in heart" (Matthew 11:29). It touches the heart to think of "the mighty God," the eternal Son of God. He made countless wonders and holds up the whole universe. Yet He came down and became a man, so fully that He could say those words. We may well seek to follow in His steps.
Note: the ESV renders Matthew 11:29 "gentle and lowly in heart." Older translations read "meek and lowly" — the same word Paul uses in Ephesians 4:2.
- Grace first. God has brought us close to Himself, and that empties out self-importance. Lowliness is the effect of the calling, not a technique added to it.
- Self gone. Lowliness gives no offense and meekness takes none. Let self have its way, and fellowship breaks down into strife.
- Then patience. Long-suffering is what you need when the other person has not learned the first two.
- Love as the motive. Silence can be pride in disguise. Forbearance is only real when love grieves over the wrong instead of despising the person.
- Tested together. The four graces are for church life, where friction is common. We learn them by following the One who called Himself gentle and lowly in heart.
using diligence to keep the unity of the Spirit in the uniting bond of peace.
Paul spends three chapters on what God has done for believers. Then he turns to how they are to live together. The first thing he asks for is not the making of unity, but the guarding of one that already exists. Whose unity is it? What does keeping it involve? And why is peace called a bond?
The unity in this verse is a fact before it is a duty.
This unity is what we have to keep. We are urged to be "eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace" — to keep in practice what already exists in fact. We are not to make a unity, but to keep, by the bond of peace, the unity that exists through the presence of the Holy Spirit in the one body.
One writer explains why the verse says "of the Spirit" and not "of the body."
Christians can agree with one another and still miss this unity.
We are to aim at more than agreement. We could all be of one mind, in the sweetest agreement, in favour of something completely wrong! We are to give all diligence to keeping the unity of the Spirit — not Paul's unity, not Peter's, not yours or mine, but the unity the Spirit has produced. We did not make this unity, and we cannot break it. The Spirit made it, and we are to keep it in practice in the bond of peace.
A closer look at the original wording brings out both the effort involved and the function of peace.
What then is the great leading principle of a walk worthy of our wonderful calling? The place this has in our hearts and lives will serve to test how far we are in unison with the mind of God for the glory of Christ in the Assembly; it is seen in Ephesians 4:3, which literally translated reads: "Using diligence to keep the unity of the Spirit in the uniting bond of peace"; but we must not overlook the moral conditions in which alone, even in the brightest days of the Assembly, such a path could be maintained.
There is only one way into this verse, and it is the verse before it.
People often ask what it means to be "eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace" (Eph. 4:3), and they pass over the first two verses… You cannot get to verse 3 without going through verse 2 and learning it in practice. We need all the humility, gentleness, patience, and bearing with one another in love, to keep the unity of the Spirit.
The peace in view is not first our own peace with God.
Peace is spoken of here not so much for our own souls before God, but for enjoying and furthering union among God's people in practice. The flesh is anxious and restless. A peaceful spirit is the fruit of the Holy Spirit, and it does much to bind hearts together in practice.
That bond is no call to smooth things over by dropping the truth.
This unity cannot be kept where man's mind and will are in control. It is kept only where the Spirit is free to make known the mind and will of God, and where there is a settled effort to carry out what God has said. No one can force such a state. It is the fruit of communion, so the words "in the bond of peace." How far this is from the common desire, even among true believers, for peace at any price. If we give up divine principles for the sake of peace, that is not the peace of the unity of the Spirit.
The old state of things can never be restored. Even so, the command stands.
Scripture never allows that it is impossible for God's people to walk in fellowship with God's Spirit and to hold on to the truth. That is always possible. The Spirit of God assumes there will be evil and dangerous days. Even so, God commands us to be "eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace," and He commands nothing impossible. We can never restore anything to what it was. But we can walk in obedience to the word, and in the company of the Spirit of God.
- Given — The Spirit's presence in the one body has already made this unity. Your part is to keep it, not to build it.
- Guarded — Paul says "of the Spirit," not "of the body." The wording stops anyone tying this unity to an outward institution.
- Genuine — Agreement is not the test. Believers can be of one mind about something wrong.
- Grown — You reach verse 3 only through verse 2: humility, gentleness, patience, and bearing with one another in love.
- Going on — Peace is the bond, but never peace bought by giving up truth. God commands nothing that has become impossible.
[There is] one body and one Spirit, as ye have been also called in one hope of your calling;
Paul has just urged believers to keep the unity of the Spirit. Now he gives the reason: a list of "ones" that starts with the body, the Spirit, and the hope. So what is this one body? Who holds it together? What future do its members share?
The apostle groups these "ones" into circles. The first circle holds every Christian alive right now.
Notice now the three circles the apostle presents: "There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called to the one hope that belongs to your call" (v. 4). That shows us the circle of divine reality. That one Body and Spirit embrace every Christian, every child of God on earth at this moment, even as the hope is one, of which the Spirit is the source and power.
Each of the three "ones" in the verse rules something out.
In the first circle, one body shuts out all human organisations. The One Spirit excludes the flesh and its activities. And earthly hopes give way to the heavenly hope of our calling.
What we see in the Christian world is not a true picture of the body. The two words "one body" carry the weight of the sentence. The link with "one Spirit" explains why there can be no second body.
The outward condition of the church gives us anything but a true picture of the body. God's word is emphatic in saying "there is one body," or it might read simply "one body" (Ephesians 4:4). It is as though God would press on our hearts the thought held in those two words. That verse again ties the oneness of the body to the "one Spirit." There is only one Holy Spirit, and His work produces only one body.
This body is not a theory. It exists now, it has a start date, and a membership that crosses the deepest human divide of the day — between Jews, God's chosen people, and everyone else.
The one body is an actual existing fact on this earth. It was formed by the baptism of the Spirit: this 1 Corinthians 12:13 shows. This baptism took place on the day of Pentecost, so someone may wonder why Acts 2 does not reveal and state the fact. But one essential feature is that the body includes both Jews and Gentiles. So it was fitting for that revelation to wait until Gentiles too were baptised into the body.
The three items are not a random list. They move from the fact, to the power behind it, to its source.
Then we hear the particulars, and in a very orderly manner. This verse states the intrinsic unity that never passes away. It begins with the fact of "one body." Then comes the power that produces it, one Spirit. Last comes the cause of it all, the calling of grace. Nothing touches these.
This one hope has a definite event attached to it.
All this fits the calling of the saints with one hope in view — the coming of the Lord for all His saints. No one who is His own can be shut out of this hope, for there is only "one hope." In scripture, hope always carries the thought of something future but certain, never mere wishful thinking.
The same holds for the calling that carries the hope.
There is only one Christian calling. "Our calling" is not sectarian. Scripture knows nothing of a special "calling" for a particular class or company of Christians. Some Christians understand their calling better than others. Some may walk more fully in its truth and shape their conduct to match it. But this is in no sense a different calling.
Since the Spirit formed this unity, our task is care, not construction.
We are to give all diligence to keeping the unity of the Spirit. It is not Paul's unity, not Peter's, not yours or mine, but the unity which the Spirit has produced. We did not make the unity, and we cannot break the unity. The Spirit made it and we are to keep it in a practical way in the uniting bond of peace.
This has a sharp consequence for a Christian world split into rival groups.
That grand statement sets out the only true ground on which believers can gather: "There is one body and one Spirit." And again, "Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body." (Eph. 4:4; 1 Cor. 10:17) If God declares that there is only "one body," then many bodies, sects, or denominations must be contrary to His mind.
- One Spirit — there is only one Holy Spirit, and everything in this verse flows from that single fact.
- One body — because the Spirit is one, His work produces one body. It was formed at Pentecost, and it holds Jew and Gentile alike.
- One hope — the same calling fixes one certain future for every member, and God leaves no one out.
- One calling — no class of Christian has a higher or different calling; some walk in it better, but every believer shares it.
- One duty — we did not make this unity and cannot break it; our one task is to keep it, in the bond of peace.
one Lord, one faith, one baptism;
Paul lists seven things that are already one, and verse 5 holds three of them. Why does he group the Lord, the faith and baptism apart from the body and the Spirit of verse 4?
Commentators describe the unities of verses 4–6 as widening rings. This verse forms the middle ring.
The apostle speaks of a sevenfold unity in Ephesians 4. Within it we can clearly see a threefold sphere of blessing, based on the relationships of the Godhead to us... There are here three concentric circles: that of the Church, that of the kingdom, and that of creation.
Verse 4 names a unity that is living and everlasting. Verse 5 moves to something outward.
The unity in this verse differs from the unity in verse 4. It is the unity of the Christian profession, which is not necessarily living and everlasting. It is excellent in itself. But those who have the outward privileges might not themselves be born of God.
Here the title "Lord" sets Christ apart from the Father. Writers add that this takes nothing from who He is.
In Ephesians 4:5 Christ is marked off as "one Lord" from the Father, and 1 Corinthians 8:6 does the same. This takes nothing away from His own divine glory. It shows us another glory instead: the glory He receives as the exalted man made Lord and Christ.
The Lord is the one authority over this circle, and that shapes how local churches — assemblies — act toward each other.
This is the circle of profession, marked by one authority, the Lord; one profession of belief, the faith; and one baptism, which brings us into it. Authority and administration belong to the Lord. Recognising that there is one Lord shuts out the authority of man and rules out all independent action. If we admit that there is "one Lord", we cannot say it is right for one assembly to ignore discipline that another assembly has genuinely carried out in the Name of the Lord.
The word "faith" can mean the act of trusting, or the thing believed. Only one of those can be counted as one.
Faith here is the truth of the doctrine we profess. It is not personal living faith, because then he could not say one faith. One faith is the one thing believed, and in holding it true we own the Lord.
Is this baptism with water, or with the Spirit? Most writers say water, for two reasons: where the phrase sits, and what the word normally means.
Some have thought this is the baptism of the Spirit. But the Spirit's baptism forms the body, so it would belong to the first circle. There it would be needless, since one Spirit joined with one body already says everything. Also, "baptism" on its own naturally means the rite. When the word carries another sense, other words are added to explain it.
Commentators differ here. Others argue from the subject of the passage that Paul means the Spirit's baptism.
The outward ceremony is probably not in view here. Remember that the Church in its unity is still the subject the Apostle has in mind. The Church, as a body, has been baptized once for all by the Holy Spirit. That baptism took place at Pentecost, when God openly claimed as His own the cleansed worshippers who trusted in the name of Jesus (Acts 2).
An outward act puts a person inside this circle. So the circle can hold people who were never changed within.
Verse 5 marks the circle of public profession and acknowledgement of Christ as Lord. That is wide enough, and large enough. Many are baptized, but are their sins forgiven? If not, they are merely in the circle of profession, and that is a sad condition to be in.
One name from Scripture makes the danger concrete.
Simon Magus believed and was baptized; he was never of the body of Christ. This unity has to do with professed Christianity on the earth.
Each "one" here is also a "not many."
"One Lord" excludes the many lords of the pagan nations. "One faith" excludes all schools of merely human thought. "One baptism" excludes the many baptisms of the law. The believer professed discipleship to the one Lord by one baptism.
- Circle — Three rings widen across verses 4 to 6: the Church, then Christian profession here, then creation.
- Lord — One Lord means one authority. Christ holds that place of lordship as the exalted man, and He leaves no room for man's authority or independent action.
- Faith — One faith is the one thing believed. It is the truth we confess, not the trust inside each heart, since such trust could never be called one.
- Baptism — One baptism is the door into the circle. Most writers read it as the water rite; some argue for the Spirit's baptism at Pentecost.
- Warning — The circle is wide. It holds unconverted people too, so standing inside it does not prove your sins are forgiven.
one God and Father of all, who is over all, and through all, and in us all.
Paul is urging believers to keep the unity of the Spirit, and he backs that plea with a list of things that are "one." This verse is the last and largest of them, and it raises two questions: in what sense is God the Father of all, and what does it mean that He is in all?
Commentators read verses 4–6 as three rings, each wider than the last. This verse draws the outermost:
Ephesians 4:4-6 presents three circles. (1) The circle of reality—"One body, one Spirit, one hope of your calling." (2) The circle of profession—"One Lord, one faith, one baptism." (3) The circle of that which is universal—"One God and Father of all."
A believer stands inside all three at once, and enters each ring a different way:
God is called Father of all as the Originator of all, in the sense of being Creator. He is supreme, for He is over all and works through all, but He is only "in us all" — the believing company. This company is in all three circles. Because of natural birth they are in circle 3. Because they have owned Jesus as Lord and have been baptised they are in circle 2. As sealed with the Spirit they are members of the one body, so they are in circle 1.
Kelly presses the words "of all" to their full extent:
So He is the "one God and Father of all." That does not mean the Father of believers only — that is a mistake about the force of the words — but of all without exception. Earlier, in Ephesians 3:15, we were told that every family in heaven and earth is named from Him. Every family draws its being from this one universal source — Jews or Gentiles, rulers or powers alike.
This universal fatherhood, however, is no substitute for salvation:
But God being Father of all in this way only makes man's wickedness and unbelief harder to excuse, and more ruinous. It has to do with nature only. That nature is now fallen and sinful, and it proved itself God's enemy by rejecting His Son, whom He sent to save. Salvation is in no other than Christ Jesus, His only begotten Son, and our Lord. Only then are we who believe His sons by grace.
"Through all" means God is present throughout everything. That is not the same as saying everything is God.
That is, this is a personal God. It is not at all the idea that everything is God — Pantheism — which is unbelief in its worst form. We own "one God," not many gods like the Gentiles, but "one God and Father of all." The Jew did not believe He was the Father of all. He did not even think of Him as Father to Israel, the chosen nation, but as their Governor, Jehovah. The Christian revelation shows God in a far larger character, and one far closer to us.
One writer sums up each of the three phrases in a single word:
"Above all" — supremacy; "through all" — permeation; "in you all" — Christianity.
Many manuscripts read "in us all" rather than "in all," and the ESV reads "in all." Kelly argues that this narrowing is the point:
The apostle had traced inner, living unity in verse 4, and outward unity in verse 5. He closes with the unity of the God and Father of all. God is supreme over everything and present through everything, and yet He is most intimate with "us all" — and that is limited to us all, that is, those who believe. No careless writer, still less a forger, could have hit on a shade of truth so unexpected, yet so weighty and welcome once it is stated.
The indwelling is the part of this verse that was new:
That He is in all His believing people was newly declared when the Holy Spirit came from heaven. That coming is the triumphant proof that the work of redemption is complete, and by it saved sinners have become the dwelling place of His holiness. This teaching states the height of the believer's security and blessedness. God was in Christ. He is in the man who now, by faith, confesses that Name.
These unities are not decoration. Each one is a bond:
What mighty bonds of unity! The Spirit of God, the lordship of Christ, the presence of God everywhere, even the Father Himself — each is a divine centre, and each draws into one those who are joined to it. We cannot have faith, or enjoy hope, or live the Christian life in any form at all, without holding the same faith and the same hope as the rest. Our one task is to keep that unity in practice.
Lived out, the third circle answers worry:
In the third circle all the anxious care of the natural man is met by the realisation that as believers we are united together as having one God and Father who is "above all" that we have to meet down here; who is working out His ways "through all" circumstances, and who is "in us all," seeing that, as His children, we share His nature.
- Widest. Verses 4–6 draw three circles: reality, profession, and creation. This verse draws the largest, and the believer stands inside all three.
- All. "Father of all" means all without exception. God is the Originator of every family in heaven and earth, not of believers only.
- Above. "Over all" is His supremacy. "Through all" means He is present throughout everything — not that everything is God.
- In. The last phrase narrows on purpose. God lives in those who believe, and that indwelling proves redemption is complete.
- Therefore. These unities already exist. Our one task is to keep them in practice.
But to each one of us has been given grace according to the measure of the gift of the Christ.
Paul has been writing about what all Christians share — one Spirit, one Lord. Now he turns to a single word: "each." The verse raises three questions. What is this grace? Who gives it? And why do no two Christians receive the same amount?
The word "but" marks a change of subject. What was true of all is now true of each one.
The Apostle has been speaking of what is common to all. In contrast, there is what is given to "each one." The one Spirit of verse 4 and the one Lord of verse 5 rule out independence; "each one" of verse 7 keeps our individuality. While every member has its special function, all serve the unity and good of the whole body.
Unity, then, is not sameness. One writer answers the objection from the body itself:
Does the oneness that Scripture insists on so strongly imply a lifeless uniformity? The very picture Scripture uses for it proves the exact opposite. In the human body no two parts are alike. The endless differences in its bones, veins, muscles and ligaments all help the whole body work in health. Different kinds of action do not mean splits and division.
The word "gift" in this verse carries a double sense, and missing that leads readers astray.
The word "gift" has a double sense. If you miss this, you might read verse 7 as if Christ Himself were the gift. It means the giving as well as the thing given. Grace here is simply a favour given — a special grace granted when Christ qualifies a man for service.
So the "grace" of this verse is something handed over, not something worked up:
This is not simply a question of qualities a person already has. Still less is it a matter of something achieved, however well meant the wish may be to honour the Holy Spirit. It is a new thing given, the positive result of grace. It is the fruit of the Lord's free favour, and in these things He acts according to His own sovereign will and for the glory of God.
Ephesians and 1 Corinthians both treat gifts, but they view them from different angles, and this verse belongs to the first.
Christ, as Head and Lord, gives certain gifts according to His own good pleasure. Note that this is how the Holy Spirit presents ministry in Ephesians. No one, I need hardly say, is brought into such clear prominence as Christ. In Corinthians, on the contrary, the Holy Spirit is more prominent than Christ. Both aspects are necessary to God's glory and equally perfect in their place; but they are not the same thing.
The words "each one" leave nobody out, though a gift may be small.
Every true Christian has something given to him for service in the body — maybe only a little wisdom. Everybody has something for service to the body, like a hand or a foot or an eye. But not everybody has a prominent gift, such as a pastor or an evangelist.
Because the assignment comes from Him, even the smallest task carries weight:
In His goodness, the Lord has given each one of us some part to play. So we ought to realise that we are of service to Him. It is this that gives dignity and character to every little bit of service to Christ.
The grace comes measured out, and the measure marks where a person should stop.
On this last point, the measure of the gift, let me say this. I do not doubt that people would recognise many a Christian's gift if he did not go beyond his measure in it. Everything past that is flesh and pushing himself forward. People feel it, and they reject his whole gift — all because he never learned to keep within his measure.
The same boundary rules out copying somebody else:
I shall badly fail if I try to imitate another's gift. My gift is measured out by Christ in glory... One may be decidedly limited in a certain line, another in a different line, but our limitations ought to be heeded: they are a reminder of our dependence, and should certainly keep us humble.
The gift you receive is a debt you owe. Holding it back is not modesty.
It is the privilege of each one to contribute his share to the common treasury of gift with which Christ has endowed His Church. In fact, the one who does not contribute is holding back what he owes the whole family of God. And no one with a single talent has the right to wrap it in a napkin for that reason: it would be plain unfaithfulness and unbelief.
- Giver — In Ephesians the gifts come from Christ as Head, who gives as He pleases. Corinthians looks at the same subject and puts the Spirit in the foreground.
- Grace — This is not the grace that saves a sinner, and not a quality you develop. It is a new thing handed to you: Christ qualifying you for service.
- Each — The reach is complete: every true Christian has something for the body, even if it is only a little wisdom.
- Measure — Christ fixes the amount. Go beyond it and it is flesh, and people reject the whole gift.
- Use — What you hold back is a debt unpaid to the whole family of God; the one-talent servant has no excuse.
Wherefore he says, Having ascended up on high, he has led captivity captive, and has given gifts to men.
In the middle of writing about the church's unity, Paul quotes an old song of victory and applies it to Christ, risen and gone up. Two questions follow: why does the quotation differ from the psalm, and who are the captives He led away?
In the psalm Christ receives gifts; in Ephesians He gives them. One writer traces that change and the new period it points to:
Notice that the Spirit of God, in quoting this passage, has changed and widened its scope a little. The psalm, after declaring Christ's victory, says: "You have received gifts for men," or, "in the man." The apostle quotes it this way: "and gave gifts to men." The Old Testament shows Christ, as man, receiving gifts because of His triumph. But in the New Testament the Holy Spirit applies the passage to show these gifts actually handed out to those for whom He won them… In the epistle Christ hands out these gifts before that reign and that time of earthly blessing begin. He gives them in the sphere of His present interests, "to every one of us."
The change is the Holy Spirit's own, and that settles its standing:
When the Holy Spirit quotes Scripture in the New Testament, the quotation is as much Scripture in its New Testament place as in its Old. Any change the Holy Spirit makes in the quotation is itself Scripture.
Older translations read "he led captivity captive." The phrase is war language, and its earlier uses set the sense. One writer answers a question about it:
The expression first occurs in Judges 5:12. There it means that Barak was called to lead captive those who had oppressed Israel in their pride. Psalm 68:18 does the same. It celebrates the risen and ascended Lord in the language of war, as victor over the mightiest powers of evil… it says plainly and strongly how completely He beat them. Colossians 2:15 describes the same victory over him who had the power of death, and over his angels… The cross cancels their might. It looked like Christ's defeat, but it is the ground of His triumph.
The scene is a captor taken captive. One writer draws the reversal out as a picture:
When He came into this world He found Satan the captor, and man chained, so to speak, to the wheels of his victory chariot. Man was in captivity, led or driven through the scene by the devil. Now the whole thing is turned around… He is risen from the dead, the mighty Victor, and Satan is chained to the wheels of His chariot… Satan beaten, and man set free to become Christ's willing servant.
Some have taken the captives to be Old Testament believers, carried up to heaven with Christ. One writer answers that:
In ascending, Christ led captive the evil powers that had held man captive before. It had nothing to do with the Old Testament saints or any others. After His death the Lord went to Paradise, where His Father received His Spirit… When the converted robber died, he joined the Lord in Paradise.
Christ received these gifts before He gave them, and He received them as Man:
Thus exalted, He has received gifts in man, that is, in His human character (compare Acts 2:33). It is in this way, "in man," that Psalm 68 puts it, and the quotation comes from there. Here, having received these gifts as the Head of the body, Christ is the channel of their communication to others. They are gifts for men.
The gifts He hands down are people, and the Greek word marks them off from another kind of gift:
The Lord Jesus led captivity captive, went up on high, and from there gave gifts to men. Psalm 68:18. These were apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers, for the perfecting of the saints, for the building up of the body of Christ. Here persons are the gifts, δόμα… Another list is given in 1 Corinthians 12, where the word is χάρισμα, "grace, favour."
The gift comes to a person, and then the person becomes the gift:
He makes you the holder of a certain gift, and then He takes you, gift and all, and makes a present of you to His church.
The gifts come from the ascended Christ, and He keeps giving even when His people are weak:
Here is another weighty fact. His going up to heaven did not interrupt the gifts. Ephesians 4:8-10 proves that they were given only from Him on high… Outward power in testimony may not adorn the church when it is unfaithful… Yet the love of Christ cannot refuse all that is needed for the perfecting of the saints.
- Victory first. The words are war language. Christ beat the powers that held man captive, and the cross that looked like defeat is the ground of His triumph.
- Spoil second. He does not keep the victory to Himself. The ascended Man received gifts and passed them down at once.
- Persons, not powers. He gave apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers — people handed to His body as presents.
- Reach. The psalm's fuller blessing waits for a coming day. The epistle shows the gifts already flowing to every one of us.
- Result. The supply comes only from Him on high, so it cannot fail while the saints still need perfecting.
But that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended into the lower parts of the earth?
Paul has just quoted a psalm about a conqueror going up on high with gifts for men. Now he stops to ask what going up must mean. The answer goes down before it goes up. How far down do "the lower regions" reach? And why does a verse about the gifts of Christ take this turn at all?
This verse breaks into the flow. One writer explains why the descent comes second in the telling, and gets only a passing mention:
In Ephesians 4:9-10, the eighteenth verse of Psalm 68 is quoted, and then comes the comment that His ascent means He first descended into the lower parts of the earth. The descent came first in time. But it gets only a passing mention, because His triumphant ascension is the main point before the mind of the Spirit.
One writer traces two stages in His going down:
To say that He ascended means that He first descended into the lower parts of the earth. The point He departs from here is not heaven but earth. When He came down from heaven He came only as far as earth. He came here to reveal the Father and bring the love of God to men. But when men would have nothing to do with Him, He went down further, even into the lower parts of the earth. He said in the day of His rejection: "For just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth" (Matt. 12:40).
One writer sets a firm limit on how far down the phrase reaches — to the grave, the place of the dead, and no further:
Ephesians 4:9 gives no support to any descent of the Lord to carry the departed saints on high. True, the verse does not speak of His descent as the Son from heaven to become man. It goes no further than His descent to the grave, as a man on earth. He tasted death, truly died, and was buried. Jehovah would not leave His soul in Sheol or Hades, nor let His holy One see corruption. He who descended so low ascended far above all the heavens, so that He might fill all things.
Not everyone stops at the grave. Others read the descent as the whole way down, from becoming man to the cross:
He had the highest place above, if I may say so, naturally and in His own being. It belonged to Him as the Son of God, who was equal with God by right; yet He stooped to be made flesh. God's purpose required that He should be man. Without His becoming man there could have been no undoing of the whole ruin of mankind, and of the dishonour done to God by sin. There could have been no defeat of Satan, and no full and righteous deliverance for man... To have stooped to become man, and to live as He lived, rejected and humbled on earth, would have been much. But what is that compared to the cross? He went down to the very lowest, and because of that humiliation He is now, as man, exalted to the highest.
One writer sets the descent inside a bigger story — man's captivity, and his rescue:
This Deliverer has proved Himself not only mighty in this way, but glorious. He fills all things. He has both descended and ascended. He has been in the lower parts of the earth — the grave, the very stronghold of the Captor. He is now far above all heavens... He carried out the deliverance in the lower parts of the earth. Now, in the highest places, far above all heavens, He has received gifts for those who were once the victims of the Serpent. He has handed them out.
One writer answers a worry: could this supply of gifts ever end?
Perhaps some have already asked: Will this ever end? Will the assembly one day be left without building up? But then we look into the open heaven and see Christ there. He is still there, and He is still the One who gives the gifts. He so loved the assembly that He descended into the lower parts of the earth. So the ministry which those gifts carry out cannot stop while Christ is there!
- Down first. The descent came first in time. It gets only a passing mention, because the triumphant ascension is the main subject.
- Down from earth. He came from heaven only as far as earth. When men rejected Him, He went lower still, into the heart of the earth.
- Down to the grave. Commentators differ here. Some limit the phrase to His death and burial. Others trace the whole stoop, from becoming man to the cross.
- Down into enemy ground. The grave was the Captor's stronghold. He went in, won the deliverance there, and came out.
- Down, therefore up. The One who went lowest now gives from the highest place, and while He is there the supply for His body cannot fail.
He that descended is the same who has also ascended up above all the heavens, that he might fill all things;
This verse is a short aside, and it reaches from the grave to the highest heaven. Two questions sit at its centre: who is the One who travelled both ways, and what does it mean that He fills all things?
The One in the depths and the One in the heights are not two figures but one.
This is the One, the same One, the only One. He has left His memorial in "the lower parts of the earth," and borne it with Him upward, "far above all the heavens." He fills all things. God has been here; Man is there. In earlier days faith was told that God was here on earth in full glory — the Son among the children of men. In these days faith is told that Man is now in heaven. He entered there from the slight and the scorn, the weakness and the humiliation of the scene here.
The descent went below the earth — into the grave and hades, the unseen world of the dead.
He went down into the lower parts of the earth, the grave, but hades for His soul. He went into the under world, the lower parts of the earth, and then He is far above all the heavens. He has been below creation, for death and hades are in a sense below it. Then He is above it. In this way He fills all things. We see Christ in His redemption power filling everything. All service and ministry have their place in that, and they flow from it.
Other passages put the ascension in milder words. This one goes further.
"Far above all the heavens" is a remarkable expression. In Mark 16 we have the Divine Servant "taken up into heaven." In Hebrews 4 the great High Priest has "passed through the heavens." Here the victorious Man has "ascended far above all the heavens." The very heaven of heavens is His. And it is His so that He may "fill all things" — another remarkable word. Even today each believer should be filled with the Spirit, as we see a little further on in this letter. A believer filled with the Spirit must be filled with Christ, and so Christ comes out of him. The day is coming when Christ will fill all things, and then all things will display Him and His glory. The "all things" spoken of here means everything that in any way comes under His headship — everything within the universe of blessing.
What is this fullness? One answer looks past Godhead alone.
The fullness of Him that fills all in all is not just Godhead, but Christ in redemption. Ephesians 4:10 leads one to this. It is redemption. He who went into the lower parts of the earth is now far above all the heavens.
That filling is God's answer to how low His Son went.
We may not be able to fathom this profound language. Still, it cannot mean less than this. Because Christ humbled Himself, and because of the work He then carried out to accomplish the purposes of God, He will one day flood the whole universe with His own redemption-glory. And this, and nothing short of this, will be God's answer to the humiliation of His beloved Son.
The road He took is what qualifies Him to give gifts.
If Christ has ascended on high, it must mean that He first descended into the lower parts of the earth. He has been into death, and from that lowest place He has ascended far above all the heavens. So He has passed through "all things." In doing so He has gained, as Man, perfect knowledge of every circumstance of life and death the believer may have to pass through... Knowing "all things," He can give gifts that meet our every need as we travel through this world of sorrow and trial on our way to glory.
Look for a place where Christ has not been, and the search closes both ways.
He has gone right down to the very depths where He overcame Satan, and ascended to God's right hand. His present position and His glory give Him this privilege: He makes those who were Satan's captives the vessels of His power to deliver others... God fills the whole horizon of the soul here with Christ. Look as deep down as you like, He has been there. Look as high as you like, He is there.
- One Person. The One in the grave and the One above every heaven are the same, the only One — this is the hinge the verse turns on.
- Down first. The descent went below creation itself — into death and the unseen world, where the enemy held power.
- Up furthest. Not just into heaven, and not just through the heavens, but far above them all, as a victorious Man.
- Filling, not just occupying. What fills the universe is Christ in redemption. One day the whole creation will be flooded with redemption-glory — God's answer to His Son's humiliation.
- Filling us now. He knows every step of the road, so His gifts meet our real needs. Filled with His Spirit, believers start to display Him here.
and *he* has given some apostles, and some prophets, and some evangelists, and some shepherds and teachers,
The gifts in this verse are not offices men hand out, but people the risen Christ Himself hands down to His church. Everything turns on two questions: who is the "He" who gave, and what did He give — abilities, or persons?
Before naming a single gift, the passage stops to describe the One doing the giving. One writer draws attention to that pause:
The answer is in verse 11 of Ephesians 4: "He gave." Who is the He? The person who ascended and took His seat at God's right hand. And before telling us that He gave apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers, the Holy Spirit turns aside to tell us who this person is — "He who ascended is the same also that descended into the lower parts of the earth, that he might fill all things." Before He touches the question of ministry, He fixes our eyes on this person, on some sides of His divine and moral glory.
The verse does not say He gave gifts of apostleship or teaching. He gave apostles. He gave teachers.
I do not know any scripture that gives ministry according to God stronger divine backing than this. All true ministry — that is to say, gifts, persons, remember, not qualifications — flows from Him, the Head in heaven. Notice that Ephesians 4 speaks of persons: "He gave, some apostles." An apostle is a person, a pastor is a person, an evangelist is a person. It is not a question of the qualification at all. He gave the persons.
Apostles and prophets come first on the list. One writer explains why they came first, and why they are not given now:
Why were the prophets given? Because the written Scriptures were not yet complete. Now that they are complete, we do not have such gifts. The apostles and prophets are at the bottom of the building. You do not put the foundation stones of a building in the middle. You put them at the bottom. The apostles and prophets are the foundation — the Church began with them — and Jesus Christ Himself is the chief corner stone. I say this because some people who call themselves Christians tell us they have the power to appoint apostles. They must be false apostles, for you do not find apostles at the top of the building. They are at the bottom.
The other gifts divide the work between those outside and those inside. One writer then separates the pastor from the teacher:
Evangelists go out to bring others in and so enlarge the building. Pastors and teachers care for what is inside… Clearly the pastor has the people more in view, while the teacher is taken up more with the truth.
Paul does not repeat "some" before "teachers". Commentators read that wording in two ways. Some take it as one double gift resting in one man:
Only it is important to see that the pastor and teacher are joined in one person — "some pastors and teachers", not "some pastors and some teachers". It is a double gift in one individual. This matters greatly. Many teachers have almost become mere scholars and theorists, and many pastors almost philanthropists. The pastor's practical work keeps the gift of teaching wise and useful in practice.
Others hold that the link is real but not fixed. The two are "closely allied, although they are distinct gifts and one may have the one without the other, or may have them both" (Raymond K. Campbell). The ESV calls this pair "shepherds and teachers".
Because the Giver is the Head of the whole body, no group can fence a gift in:
They are given for the whole Church, not for one part of it only. An evangelist or a teacher is given for the whole Body of Christ. No denomination can claim them. No local assembly can keep their service to itself. A pastor may never work outside one assembly, yet he is a gift for the whole Body.
These gifts come from Christ, not from man. That is also why they do not run out:
But apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers are different. They are Christ's gifts and need no permission from man… The evangelists call people in from the world to God, and those people become members of Christ. The pastors and teachers then build them up in His grace and truth, holy and beloved. Notice that bishops or elders, like deacons, are not "gifts" and never appear among them… But the gifts that build up come from the ascended Christ. They are as sure today as on the day of Pentecost, and they last until the last members of His body who need them are brought in.
- Giver — the verse begins with a Person, not a programme: the One who descended and ascended is the "He" who gave.
- Gift — what He gave was people, not abilities; the man with his gift is the gift.
- Shape — apostles and prophets lay the foundation. Evangelists work outside. Pastors and teachers care for those inside.
- Reach — every gift is given to the whole body, so no denomination or assembly can claim ownership.
- Duration — these gifts come from the ascended Christ, not from man. So they need no human licence, and they will not fail until the last member is brought in.
for the perfecting of the saints; with a view to [the] work of [the] ministry, with a view to the edifying of the body of Christ;
Ephesians 4:11 lists the gifted people Christ gave when He ascended; verse 12 tells us what He gave them for. It names more than one aim, and how those aims relate shapes how we see all Christian service.
The Greek uses one preposition for the first clause and a different one for the two that follow, which sets the first aim apart as the goal and the other two as the means.
The primary and full object was the perfecting of the saints — their being formed and fashioned according to the pattern of this fulness and into it; but there was a formal and instrumental object as the medium of this. As to this in its twofold character, the Greek preposition is changed, and the article omitted: "for [pros] the perfecting of the saints; with a view to [eis] the work of the ministry, with a view to [eis] the edifying of the body of Christ." This ministerial work was clearly merely ancillary, and the edifying of the body of Christ, for the perfect enjoyment of the fulness by the saints, is the direct and positive object.
The ESV translates this word as "equip." Elsewhere the same word covers mending, restoring and fitting together.
There is another word, katartizo, which is sometimes translated "makes perfect" or "perfection." In other places it carries the thought of "mending" nets (Matthew 4:21). Christians were to be "perfectly joined together" (1 Corinthians 1:10). Someone caught in a fault was to be "restored" in a spirit of gentleness (Galatians 6:1). A body was "prepared" for the Son (Hebrews 10:5). The worlds were "framed" by the word of God.
Two of the three aims are personal and one is collective, and the order matters.
Here in Ephesians the individual saints are the first object: "for (pros) the perfecting of the saints." Then it adds, "for (eis) the work of the ministry, for the building up of the body of Christ." The first thing is that each saint should grow up to Him who is the head, that is, Christ. There are three objects... You must not lose sight of the individual when you get into the body.
Christ Himself gave these gifted people. Who gave them decides who they answer to.
This affords us a most important principle. The gifts were not bestowed upon the Church, but upon men for the benefit of the Church. So those who have received them are responsible for their exercise, not to the Church, but to the Lord. So it is impossible for the Church to appoint pastors and teachers, or any of the gifts named. The Church's responsibility is to receive the ministry of everyone the Lord has qualified to build it up.
The first aim is Christ's own. Its outcome does not rest on how well His servants do.
The gifts are for the perfecting of the saints. The ministry may fail, but the Lord never fails in accomplishing His end. It may happen in a slower way, and some of it may be very weak and even distressing. But He accomplishes His purposes... These two latter clauses come in as subordinate to the first. It is a wonderful thing to see the saints acting together. But the work of the ministry may fail or be spoiled in man's hands. The great end that the Lord commits Himself to, and for which He gave these gifts, is carried through despite everything.
This verse says what Christ is doing now. It also shows what He is not doing.
The object that God had in committing all this administration to Christ is at the present time the perfecting of the saints. If you understand that, you will see that Christianity did not come into the world to make the earth better. The whole service of Christ now, and His whole administration now, is for the perfecting of the saints, not for the improvement of the world. The way He carries it on is by constant ministry from Himself... The evangelist is just as much for the perfecting of the saints as the apostle. The evangelist who thinks he is only there to save souls is mistaken... If there were no evangelists there would be no saints to perfect.
Not all New Testament gifts work the same way. The gifts named here come with a promise attached.
There are two kinds of gifts entirely distinct... when I come to Ephesians 4, I find no gifts that are signs at all. After the foundation of apostles and prophets, I find evangelists, pastors and teachers — those the Lord uses to build up His church, "until we all come." I see Christ caring for His own body to build it up, and also the plain statement that these gifts go on to the end.
- Source. Christ ascended and gave the gifts to men, for the church's good. So those who hold them answer to the Lord, not to a committee.
- Goal. The leading aim is the perfecting of the saints — mending, restoring, fitting together.
- Means. The work of ministry and the building up of the body are the channels Christ uses to reach that first aim.
- Reach. Each believer growing up to Christ comes first. The growth of the whole body follows, and no individual is lost in it.
- Result. Ministry can falter in human hands. But Christ carries His own aim through, and the gifts continue until we all reach full growth.
until we all arrive at the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, at [the] full-grown man, at [the] measure of the stature of the fulness of the Christ;
Paul has just listed the gifts the ascended Christ gave to His people, and here he names the goal of all that ministry. Three questions follow: which unity does he mean, what is "mature manhood," and when do we reach it?
The word "until" fixes how long Christ's gifts to His people last. One writer argues that no one can claim we have reached the goal, so the supply has not stopped:
His ascension to heaven did not interrupt these gifts. Ephesians 4:8-10 shows the opposite: only from Him on high were they given, and given until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God… to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ. No right-minded Christian will claim we have reached this yet, so neither should he doubt the unfailing grace of Christ… the love of Christ cannot refuse all that is needed for the perfecting of the saints, for ministerial work, for building up His body.
"The faith" here means a body of truth, and the unity it produces is not one that people arrange:
The faith the apostle speaks of is the whole system of Christian truth. The unity is not agreement on a creed, and not an alliance that people arrange. It is a unity of mind and heart, produced by grasping the truth as God teaches it in His word.
Another writer marks off this unity from the unity of the Spirit:
The unity of the faith, in verse 13, is another matter. The activity of the gifts has the building up of the body of Christ in view, to this end: "Until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God." We must not confuse the two. The unity of the faith is objective — something the saints are to arrive at. The unity of the Spirit is more subjective, and involves the living oneness of the members of the body of Christ.
The verse joins the faith to a Person, and the knowing it asks for is acquaintance, not information:
This knowledge is not a mere taking in of truth. It is a personal acquaintance with the Person of the Son of God. And it is knowing Him not only as Saviour, but as Son of God. The world will know Him as Judge and King, the Jew as Messiah; our special privilege is far above their knowledge. Take any gathering of believers: where you find some measure of this knowledge of the Son of God, you may be sure there is a matching measure of the unity of the faith.
Does this mean every believer must first become perfect? One writer answers no:
I do not think that means until every person is perfect. The point is not that I become a perfect man on my own. It is the full-grown man: the one body, made up of all its living members, grown to its fullest extent, so that it gives a full and well-proportioned picture of the life of Christ.
Why does Paul add the knowledge of the Son of God? Kelly answers that, and names the standard our growth aims at:
Adding the knowledge of the Son of God was necessary, because it is up to His stature, known in this way, that we are to grow… The perfect man simply means the state: a full-grown man. But the measure of the stature of a full-grown man in Christ is Christ Himself. All the fulness that is in Him is worked into the soul, and the soul takes its shape from it. The soul becomes like Him and is filled with Him in all its thoughts. Christ's outward fulness measures and forms the soul's inward state, so that there is no mismatch and no separation from Him — the believer grown up to Him in everything.
Commentators differ here. Some read the goal as a maturity possible now, in contrast with the childishness of verse 14:
The perfection spoken of here seems not to be perfection in glory, where all will no doubt be according to Christ. It seems to be a state of full growth on earth, in contrast with the infancy and weakness of verse 14.
Others hold that only heaven can answer to the words:
The gifts will continue until the Church is complete in heaven, and until the building up of the body reaches its finished state: the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ. No partial perfection reached before then can fill out the meaning of this verse.
- Gift — Christ gave ministry from heaven, and "until" keeps the supply coming while the goal is still ahead.
- Faith — the first target is one mind in the whole body of truth, formed by God's word, not by human arrangement.
- Knowledge — that truth is not a subject but a Person; the aim is personal acquaintance with the Son of God.
- Man — the outcome is one full-grown man: the whole body showing Christ, not a crowd of people each finished on their own.
- Measure — the standard is Christ's own fulness worked into the soul; writers differ on whether we reach it on earth or only in glory, but nothing less than Christ is the aim.
in order that we may be no longer babes, tossed and carried about by every wind of *that* teaching [which is] in the sleight of men, in unprincipled cunning with a view to systematized error;
Paul has just described the goal of every gift Christ gave His church: full growth measured by Christ Himself. This verse states the other side of that goal — what we are meant to leave behind.
The word rendered "children" describes infancy, and the exhortation assumes movement out of it.
"That from now on we may no longer be children (infants), tossed to and fro and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, by which they lie in wait to deceive." (Eph. 4:14.) This exhortation involves the fact of growth. The immature, easily-imposed-upon state is looked at as the one out of which believers should emerge.
The verse does not tell us to become clever. It ties our steadiness to the maturity described in the verse before it.
The first result of this maturity in Christ is a soundness of judgment in spiritual things. It makes even the least educated believer proof against the clever arguments of the human mind. It is important to notice how we gain this ground. It is not by human learning, or by skill in argument. This verse connects with the one just before it. Our stability among the shifting currents of human opinion and speculation is the result of being full-grown in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God. That means an intelligent acquaintance with the word of God, and a heart acquaintance with the blessed Lord Himself. Scripture proposes no other safeguards against error and false doctrine, and none that man sets up is of the smallest use.
One commentator, quoting an older translation, shows why ignorance leaves a believer open to deceit.
The effect of this full growth would be that we should no longer be babes in Christian knowledge. While we are ignorant, we are liable to be "tossed and carried about by every wind of that teaching which is in the sleight of men, in unprincipled cunning with a view to systematized error." Sadly, there are those in the Christian profession who, with sleight and cunning craftiness, are ready to deceive those not established in the truth. Whenever someone in the history of God's people plainly denies a great truth, or puts forward some special error about the Person of Christ, you will usually find a whole system of error behind that one wrong doctrine.
One writer traces this plot back past the men who carry it out.
"The sleight of men" is set in this passage against the wisdom of God, and the method of deceit against the counsel of saving truth in Christ. Men are indeed the actors in this intricate plot of craft and falsehood; but Satan is its first inventor, and the ruling mover of its action.
Christ keeps giving gifts to His church. One writer explains what they are meant to produce.
God wants His saints firmly established in His grace and truth, and in the knowledge of His Son. Then they will be proof against the ever-changing tricks of the enemy. The church of God will never be without souls needing help on to full growth. So the ever faithful Head will continue the gifts of His grace until the end: "till we all come." Christ does not give gifts to make the saints helplessly dependent on them. It is the opposite: by means of the gifts the saints become firmly rooted and grow up into Him who is the Head — Christ.
One writer looks at what good men reached for when false teaching came in.
You are aware that at an early date false doctrines and heresies of all kinds came in. What was the resource of good men in those days? They invented creeds and confessions by which they tried to test suspected persons. But where was the authority for this course? Or was it found that these defences kept the evil out? Never, at any time or place. There is only one power for maintaining truth and love — Christ Himself.
Many people try to master every false system so they can answer it. One writer points the other way.
We do not escape error by enquiring into all the details of the error, but by the knowledge of the truth. The Lord can say of His sheep, "A stranger they will not follow, but they will flee from him, for they do not know the voice of strangers" (John 10:5). Our safety, then, is found not in investigating evil, but in holding the truth in love.
- Childhood — Infancy in the faith is real, but it is a stage to grow out of, not a settled Christian condition.
- Danger — An unsettled believer is easy prey for cunning men. Behind one wrong doctrine there is usually a whole system of error.
- Provision — Christ gives gifts so that saints take root and grow, not so that they lean on the gifted.
- Safeguard — Not learning, debating skill, creeds, or the study of error. Safety is knowing the word of God and knowing the Lord Himself.
- Outcome — The grown believer holds a steady course while opinion shifts. He grows up into Christ the Head.
but, holding the truth in love, we may grow up to him in all things, who is the head, the Christ
Ephesians 4 has just described believers in danger of being blown about by every new teaching. Against that danger stands one short answer: hold the truth in love, and grow up into Christ.
The phrase covers more than accurate words. One commentator says it goes deeper than speech:
It is "being truthful in love," not just "speaking the truth in love." Speaking the truth is a very important part of being truthful, but it is not everything. We all know it is quite possible to be untruthful in thought and feeling while the words are perfectly correct. "Being truthful in love" implies truth in the inward parts.
That inward reality is why holding the truth cannot stop at the mind:
Knowing the truth in your head is not enough. You must hold it in your affections and show it in your life. Only then can we grow up to Christ, the Head, in whom every feature of the truth exists.
Truth and love are not a balance we invent. We take both from the One we grow toward.
The Christian is to grow up in line with all that Christ reveals, and to keep growing more like his Head. He uses love and truth for his own soul — the two things Christ expresses perfectly. Christ is our pattern, and our pattern as One who has overcome and gone up to heaven. He is our Head, and we are members of His body, joined to Him. From this Head, through its members, flows the grace we need to do the work of becoming like Him.
This verse answers the drifting described just before it. How we hold the truth matters as much as how firmly we hold it.
There are plenty of people ready to do Satan's deceptive work. They scheme, manipulate and make excuses, always on the watch to trap others and undermine any honest faith in the living God. But God has made provision to keep us safe from this, in the positive instructions of verse 15... Such growth needs a settled decision to hold the truth God has given us securely, in mind and in practice — not in a harsh, legal way, but in genuine love.
Growing up "in every way into him" sets no ceiling short of Christ Himself. So what is the measure of a mature believer?
The measure of the stature of a full-grown man in Christ is Christ Himself. It is all the fullness that is in Him worked into the soul. The soul is then shaped by that fullness, made like Him, and filled with Christ in all its thoughts. Its inner state is measured and formed by the fullness that really is in Christ, so that there is no gap and no separation from Him. The saint has grown up to Him in everything.
Two limits are removed by the wording. The growth covers every part of life, and it is not measured one believer at a time.
As I understand it, this is a growing together; the "all" of verse 13 growing up to Christ as one. How harmonious! If a man grows on one side only, we call him a hideous sight, a monstrosity... But holding the truth in love we are to grow up to Him in all things, until we come under the influence of the Head in every direction. Private life with God, service in the church, family life, business life — in every circle we learn to own the Lord Jesus Christ as the mind that directs us.
The work is shared out, and no part is too small.
Everybody has his or her part in God's Assembly, the ministry of each member in its place tending to the building up of the body in love... Perhaps you will say, My part is a very small one. Never mind. Do the thing the Lord gives you; it might be only to give a cup of cold water — that would be a very useful thing to a thirsty soul.
- Held — we do not just speak the truth; we hold it inside. Correct words can still hide untruthful thought and feeling.
- In love — truth and love belong together, because Christ expresses both perfectly, and He is our pattern.
- Against drift — God gave this to guard believers from schemers who trap and unsettle them.
- Toward Him — the goal is Christ Himself, not a level of knowledge. He works His fullness into the soul until nothing in us is out of step with Him.
- In every way — the growth is even and shared: every area of life, every member with a part, or the body grows lopsided.
from whom the whole body, fitted together, and connected by every joint of supply, according to [the] working in [its] measure of each one part, works for itself the increase of the body to its self-building up in love.
Paul has just described the gifts the risen Christ gave. Now he shows where the growth itself comes from: everything flows down from Christ the Head, yet nothing moves unless each part works.
The verse opens with "from whom." One writer marks the difference between what comes from the Head and what comes through the members:
All the power for growth, all the supplies, come from the Head. So the whole is said to be "from," or "out of" Him. But the "compacting" of the whole is through — not from — what every joint supplies. This happens according to the working in its measure of each part. Though everything comes from Christ, each believer still takes his proper place. So through him, in his measure, the cementing and filling up of the body goes on.
The body is joined together first; the growth comes after. We did not arrange it, and we cannot rearrange it:
The body is not only united to Christ the Head. It is also fitted together by divine workmanship. All the members depend on one another, and the living Head controls and supplies them. So that the supply from the Head might reach every member of the body, He has provided the body with the joints of supply. … How different this divine idea and formation is from man's thoughts about the church. We are not held together by a loose human bond that people can alter. We are not in the church by our own choice, or with companions we picked for ourselves. The body of Christ is not a mixture of believers and unbelievers. Only those who share the life of their living, heavenly Head belong to it, because they are joined to Him in a living way.
The gifts are not the whole story, and they are not given to everyone:
In verse 16 we move on from what the Lord is graciously doing through the gifts. Now we learn what He Himself is doing as the Head of the body. What every joint supplies is not the exercise of gift, because the gifts are not given to everyone. But every true Christian has something given from the Head to pass on to fellow members of the body. In the human body, if every member is under the direct control of the head, all the members work together for the good of the whole. In the same way, if every member of the body of Christ were under the direct control of Christ, the body would increase and build itself up in love.
The ESV says "when each part is working properly." Older translations read "the effective working in its measure of every part." One writer presses that phrase home:
Of course, we are meant to grow together. But it happens according to the effective working in its measure of every part. I wish I knew how to convey to you the comfort of that phrase. There are some who seem to be dormant Christians, some who seem to be silent Christians. You wonder whether it could be said of them that each one is working according to the measure of his part. So much depends on your filling the role assigned to you by the Head in glory.
One writer looks at the Greek behind "makes the body grow":
I have said "makes for itself," because the form of the Greek expression implies it. However that may be, the teaching is clear. The whole body, acting through its members, gains and produces its own increase. The body is there. It grows, but it is a body all along, and it grows here on earth, not in heaven.
The verse does not stop at growth. Growth happens in love, or it does not happen:
Notice too the place love has in the self-edification of the body. Without love nothing can be achieved among the saints of God. This is not only implied here, it is taught forcefully in 1 Corinthians 13. Love is the great builder! Knowledge may puff up, but love will build up.
So what happens when a few teachers carry the whole load?
People have too often put all the responsibility of the church on those who labour in the Word. They have been content just to receive whatever such men have to give. If that changed, would there not be more real fellowship and a more general care for the increase of the body? … Are we longing for the increase of the body of Christ, and helping it forward as far as we can?
- Source. All supply comes from the Head; the compacting happens through what each joint gives.
- Structure. The body is joined and held together by God, not by a human bond people can rearrange.
- Share. Gifts are not given to everyone, but every Christian receives something from the Head to pass on.
- Scale. Each part works "in its measure" — your assigned function, no more and no less.
- Self. The body builds itself up, and it does so in love: knowledge puffs up, love builds up.
This I say therefore, and testify in [the] Lord, that ye should no longer walk as [the rest of] the nations walk in [the] vanity of their mind,
Paul has spent the earlier chapters describing what God has made believers in Christ. Now he turns to daily life, starting with a warning about the way the nations around them lived — and why that way must stop.
Everything from here on rests on the truth already taught. One writer marks the change and explains the word behind "futility":
Verse 17 begins a distinct new division in the letter to the Ephesians. This section stresses personal responsibility, resting on the solid, precious truth we have already considered. Paul urged the Ephesians to no longer walk as the unsaved masses of Gentiles walked. Their new Christian condition and position stood in contrast to that of the nations, and their conduct should stand in contrast too. He describes the condition and walk of the ungodly to show that it is the complete opposite of the walk of faith. The unsaved are turned only toward vanity — emptiness or futility — which comes to nothing of any value.
Paul does not simply advise here. He says and testifies:
In verse 17 the practical exhortations take a different shape. In verses 1-16 the instruction concerns mainly our shared walk as one body; here it is individual. He presses a fitting and separate walk. The apostle puts it solemnly: "Now this I say and testify in the Lord." He knows the dangers the believers faced everywhere, and that the Lord's honour was bound up with them. That is why his tone is so striking.
You might expect the cure for a pagan past to be a set of rules. It is not:
The apostle has shown how a believer can walk worthy of the calling he has received in the church. He now shows how the believer should carry out the same principle towards other people, whether believers or unbelievers. He does not put Gentile converts under law. He does not bring them onto Jewish ground, yet he does remove them from Gentile ground.
Paul does not start with pagan behaviour. He starts with the mind:
Here he begins with what is inside. Our tendency is to busy ourselves and others with something outward. But the apostle goes to the root of the evil walk of the Gentiles. Their minds were vain and empty. So is every mind that does not keep God clearly, firmly and knowingly in view, whatever it is dealing with. These Gentiles had God before them in nothing; they were "without God in the world." So there was nothing left but the empty, boasting mind and mouth of man, imagining one thing and saying another.
One writer traces how a life empties out, step by step:
So we learn that the evil lives men live harden the heart. The hardened heart darkens the understanding. The darkened understanding leaves men a prey to every vanity.
What guides a life like that? Another writer points to the hardened heart that darkens the understanding, leaving people led only by "the vain, sinful desires and feelings of the natural heart" (The Christian's Friend).
It would be easy to file this description under the pagan world of Paul's day. One writer will not leave it there:
At this point the exhortations to walk in separation begin. Here we are shown once more what Gentiles are in their natural condition, and how solemn that description is! The grace of God takes the believer out of these conditions and gives us power to "no longer walk as the Gentiles do." And we must not overlook this: beneath the thin veneer of the civilization we boast in, which rejects Christ and the gospel, there is the same darkened understanding, the same alienation from God, the same blindness and uncleanness that these words describe.
- Foundation — a new section starts here. Conduct grows out of the truth already taught, and rests on what God has made the believer.
- Testify — Paul's words are weighty on purpose. The Lord's honour is bound up with how His people live.
- Vanity — the word means emptiness and futility. Such a life comes to nothing of value, because God is nowhere in its thoughts.
- Root — Paul starts with the mind, not the behaviour; the outward walk is fruit, and the empty mind is the root.
- Freedom — the answer is not law but separation. Grace lifts the believer out of that old condition and gives power for a new walk.
being darkened in understanding, estranged from the life of God by reason of the ignorance which is in them, by reason of the hardness of their hearts,
Paul has just told believers not to live like the world around them. Here he names what lies underneath that way of living: a darkened understanding, a life cut off from God, ignorance, and a hard heart.
Paul does not start with what the Gentiles — the non-Jewish world — do. He starts with what they are.
Here he begins with the inner thing. We tend to busy ourselves and others with something outward. But the apostle goes to the root of the evil walk of the Gentiles. Their minds were empty. That must be true of anyone who does not have God clearly, firmly and knowingly before them in anything at all... These are various descriptions, not of the outward walk, but of the root of all the evil fruit they bore. God was not in all their thoughts.
Where the ESV says "hardness," older versions say "blindness." The word never pointed to eyesight.
"Blindness" is a very strong word. It means being hardened like a stone. The noun in Romans 11:25 is a medical term, "callus" — the hardening of skin. This is the moral state of God's earthly people. And it is not limited to Israel. Ephesians 4:18 uses the same word for the condition of the Gentiles.
The "ignorance that is in them" is not innocent lack of information. It is a refusal. The same minds are sharp enough everywhere else.
It is terrible ignorance, certainly, but it is the result of the hardness of their own hearts. Ignorance is not just a lack of knowledge; it is ignoring facts that can be known. For example, people will work out their tax returns carefully to their own advantage. They will plan their business affairs to get the most out of them... Yet at the same time they tell us that the marvellous organization of the whole universe required no mind at all — it just happened to come together!
The verse ties ignorance to hardness of heart. One writer traces the chain back a step further, to the way people live.
So we learn that the evil lives men live harden the heart. The hardened heart darkens the understanding. And the darkened understanding leaves men easy prey to every empty thing.
This phrase goes deepest of all. The rest of the verse gathers around it.
We get right to the bottom of things when we find that we have been "alienated from the life of God." Tied to this alienation are things like emptiness, darkness, ignorance, blindness, sensuality and impurity. That is no surprise, for the life of God is the exact opposite of all of them. Sin has alienated us from God, and so has cut us off from everything that makes up life according to Him.
This alienation is not a neutral distance. Where the life of God shows itself, it meets hostility. Religion is no shelter.
If he is a religious man he may pride himself on not being an unbeliever. But his heart is as dark as the heart of the worst unbeliever could be. The life of God, where he sees it in the children of God, is hateful to him... He may do his best to hide his disgust at it, but the hostility is there, though covered up.
The phrase describes man in his natural state. Christians stand on the other side of it, and that sets the standard for how they live.
It is a remarkable expression for the state of man in nature: "alienated from the life of God"... Someone will say, "You do not mean that I am to walk down here as having the life of God?" Yes. "God gave us eternal life, and this life is in His Son." From that time they were called to walk, not as good men, but as having the life of God... I have taken off the uniform of Satan and put on the uniform of Christ.
- Root — Paul starts inside, not with conduct. The empty way of living grows out of a mind with God nowhere in it.
- Hardness — the heart hardens like a callus. The same word describes Israel.
- Ignorance — not missing facts, but ignoring facts anyone can know; it comes from a hard heart.
- Alienation — cut off from the life of God: this is the bottom of the ruin. Emptiness, darkness and impurity are its signs.
- Reversal — God gives that life in His Son, so a Christian starts from a life the world does not have.
who having cast off all feeling, have given themselves up to lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greedy unsatisfied lust.
Paul is describing life outside Christ, and this verse is the bottom of it — not a few extreme people, but what human nature does when it shuts God out. Commentators trace a chain here: the way a person lives hardens the heart, the hardened heart darkens the mind, and then nothing is left to hold a person back.
The verse is the end of a sequence, not the start of one. One writer sets out the order, and it runs opposite to how most people picture moral decline.
They do not know God because the evil lives they live have hardened their hearts, for such people have given themselves over to sensuality. So we learn this: the evil lives men live harden the heart; the hardened heart darkens the understanding; and the darkened understanding leaves men easy prey to every empty thing.
Older translations read "past feeling." What has gone silent is the conscience.
"Past feeling" (v. 19) means a seared and hardened conscience, with no sense of their own sensuality.
That deadness is itself something a person has done to himself, by repetition. The habits come first; the numbness follows.
Corrupt appetites, followed without restraint, soon deaden the conscience and poison the affections, so that every right natural feeling dies... They are "past feeling." Conscience no longer restrains them, and neither does decency... So it was with the world before the flood, when corruption and violence filled the whole earth. So it was with the cities of the plain, until God rained fire and burning sulphur on them from heaven.
Nobody forced this handover. And it does not always look ugly — the same surrender can wear a respectable face.
In such a state people cast off all feeling. Things that ought to move them no longer touch them. Instead they give in to the pull of bodily desire, with its moral uncleanness and greed. Sometimes this surrender looks plainly disgusting. Sometimes it hides under a thin coat of refinement and apparent dignity, and then it has simply added deceit to everything else.
The Greek word behind "greedy" is not mainly about money. It means wanting more than you need, and it covers bodily appetite too.
The word pleonexia (from pleon, "more," and echo, "to have") is not limited to money, and it often goes with open wickedness. Its force is "desiring more than is necessary," and so "an over-reaching to get." It is therefore applied to the lusts of the flesh, Rom. 1:29; Eph. 4:19, where it is translated "greediness"; Eph. 5:3; and so on. It is declared to be idolatry, Col. 3:5.
This explains why the pursuit never ends in satisfaction. Unsatisfied desire only drives it harder, and one writer sets it against a life of a different order.
Grossness and hardness of heart lead them to cast off every refined and even proper natural feeling. As a result they give themselves up to sensuality, while unsatisfied lust drives them all the more eagerly to work every kind of uncleanness and greed. They still share the life of the old self, which corrupts itself through deceitful desires. Those who share in the mystery have put off the old self and put on the new, and the new is created in "true righteousness and holiness."
It would be easy to read this as a picture of ancient pagans only. One writer closes that door.
This is the truth about man, whoever he is and wherever he lives. The light of Christianity may hold him back, so that he shows his true character only in secret. But everything said here about the Gentiles is true of the whole Christless world, whatever people profess.
- Practice hardens. The evil life comes first. The hardened heart follows. Then the understanding goes dark. Decline runs from conduct inward, not from ideas outward.
- Hardening numbs. A callous conscience is seared. It no longer registers its own wrongdoing, and even ordinary decency loses its hold.
- Numbness surrenders. No one is dragged. People hand themselves over to bodily desire. Sometimes it is open, sometimes it hides under a polish of refinement — which only adds deceit.
- Surrender grows greedy. The word means wanting more than is necessary, an over-reaching to get. Unsatisfied desire drives the pursuit harder, and Scripture calls this greed idolatry.
- Only new creation reverses it. The cure is not better habits but a new life: the old self put off, the new self put on, created in true righteousness and holiness. And the diagnosis fits the whole Christless world, whatever people profess.
But *ye* have not thus learnt the Christ,
Paul has just described how people live when they do not know God — heart, mind and conduct all wrong (vv. 17–19). Then, in one short sentence, he sets against that whole way of life not a rule but a Person.
The Gentiles — the nations outside Israel — went wrong for one reason: they did not know God. The cure has to match that root.
All the practical evil of the Gentiles came from their ignorance of God. Heart, mind and walk were all wrong, and getting worse. So now God's deliverance from all evil — root, branch and fruit — is Christ. Christ is the way, as well as the truth. The one great means that fits every case, and gives the surest deliverance, is Christ Himself. Here Christ Himself is the One who deals directly with the soul. It is as if we listened to Christ ourselves.
The Ephesians did not swap the old way of life for a new set of rules. Their guide was neither of the two things a religious person would expect.
Grace had brought the Ephesians out of this state of things. They had another guide, as far from mere natural conscience on one side as from law on the other... These Ephesians had learned, not law, but Christ.
The same writer presses a distinction hidden in the wording. Paul does not say they learned about Christ. He says they learned Christ — and that changes who can do it.
The Ephesians had "learned Christ" in the only way in which He can be learned. The natural man may learn of Christ; the spiritual man alone can learn Him. For "the natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned" (1 Cor. 2:14). There must be the hearing ear before Christ's words can be understood.
The two small words "not so" imply that there is a wrong way to learn Christ. One writer takes them as a quiet warning aimed at anyone content with the appearance of discipleship.
There is a real emphasis in this expression. It implies there is more than one way of learning Christ in name only. There are false disciples and false brothers, as well as true ones. There are some, again, who are always learning but who never come to a knowledge of the truth. There are also those who turn the grace of God into an excuse for sin, and so deny the One they claim in vain to know. There is, indeed, only one way of receiving Christ, and so of learning Him truly. It is by living faith in His Person.
Paul writes "Christ" here, then shifts to "Jesus" in the next verse. One writer reads the change as deliberate: each name gives what the other does not.
"Christ" is His official title (v. 20). As we learn more of Him exalted at God's right hand, we value and understand practical truth better, because we see it in the whole way He lived as a Man on earth. Learning Christ is learning Him as the Object of my adoration high above me. But "as the truth is in Jesus" is learning Him as my practical Example, come down to earth.
Paul's verb is past tense, yet the learning goes on. One writer turns it into a question about today.
Now we have to learn Christ. Has Christ had such a place in your hearts today that what comes from Christ has come out of you?... Are you learning Christ like this day by day?... There is for us this continual learning of Christ... It is not an effort to get more like Christ. It is that nothing in me should go against the knowledge of Him I have received.
Paul spells out the lesson in the verses that follow. So you can test the claim to have learned Christ.
To have learned Christ, then, is this: the old man is put off — corrupt through deceitful desires, our former way of life. The spirit of our mind is renewed. The new man is put on, created according to God in truthful righteousness and holiness... We never could have put him off ourselves; it would have been our own eternal condemnation.
- Root — The darkness of verses 17–19 grew from not knowing God. Verse 20 answers it with a Person, not with information.
- Subject — The lesson is Christ Himself. Anyone can learn of Him; only one taught by the Spirit learns Him.
- Standard — Not conscience, not law, but Christ. "Christ" is the exalted Object of worship; "Jesus" is the pattern lived out on earth.
- Test — Paul's wording allows for a false version. Learning in name only, endless learning, and grace twisted into an excuse for sin are all shut out.
- Proof — Having learned Christ shows itself as the old self put off and the new put on — a work no one could do for himself.
if ye have heard him and been instructed in him according as [the] truth is in Jesus;
Paul has just described the empty walk of those who do not know God, and then turns to what his readers have learned. Verse 21 gives the condition: they have heard Christ and been taught in Him. The standard they were taught by is a Person, not a set of rules.
The ESV reads "heard about him"; other translations read "heard him." Commentators press that difference, and see Christ dealing directly with the soul.
All the practical evil of the Gentiles came from their ignorance of God. The heart, the mind, the walk were all wrong, and grew worse. So now God's deliverance from all evil, root, branch and fruit, is Christ… The one great means that fits every case and gives the surest deliverance, is Christ Himself. "You have not so learned Christ." He makes Him, on purpose, the one who deals directly with the soul… It is as if we listened to Christ ourselves. "If indeed you have heard Him" — not about Him; they were taught in Him also, "as the truth is in Jesus."
So how can you tell the two apart?
The marks of a true disciple are now given: "if — or, since — you have heard Him, and have been taught in Him"… The gospel may be listened to, and yet Christ Himself not heard. But, for the believer, the Lord is in His word. Multitudes have heard the report of Him as doctrine, who never gave their hearts to Him in love.
The ESV reads "taught in him," not "taught by him." That preposition matters.
Now we have learned Christ. We have not only heard Him and believed in Him as a result. We have also been "taught by Him," or, as it can be read, "instructed in Him." He is not only our Teacher but our Lesson Book. He is not only our Lesson Book but our Example. The truth is in Jesus: that is, He Himself when here on earth was the perfect display of everything required of us.
The verse ends with the personal name, "Jesus." That name points to His life lived out among men.
The apostle brings in a verse: "as the truth is in Jesus" (Eph. 4:21). So far as I know, that is the only reference to the life of Jesus here on earth which we find in the Ephesian letter… The moral features of Christianity were seen in the Person of Christ here as Man.
That makes Him the test of every subject — man included.
Take any truth you like — for example, man. Where shall I learn the truth about man? Shall I look for it in Adam? He listened to his wife after she had listened to the devil. When God came down, he ran away from Him, and even dared to insult God by laying the blame on Him… It would all end there, but for the Second Adam. In every step He took, in every word He said, in everything that flowed from His heart and showed in His ways, I find One who never did His own will.
The Ephesians were not handed a code. They were given a Person.
They had another guide, as far removed from mere natural conscience on the one side as from law on the other… These Ephesians had learned, not law, but Christ. They had by faith heard Him, and been taught by — or rather in — Him. His own life as man had been the perfect and divine display of that truth. "The truth as it is in Jesus" does not mean the doctrinal truth of salvation, but the perfect, holy walk of truth, as shown in His person.
The sentence does not stop here. What follows spells out that truth, and the tenses matter.
"As the truth is in Jesus" — it is not doctrine, though doctrine is contained in it. The truth as it is in Jesus is the having put off the old man and put on the new, this having been done by faith. Then he adds, "and being renewed in the spirit of your mind." The putting off and the putting on are not in the present tense. Being renewed in the spirit of your mind is. The truth is that you have put off the old man, but you do need renewing… The renewing of the spirit of your mind is a thing that is always going on.
- Heard — the test is not hearing about Christ but hearing Him. Many know the report as doctrine who never gave Him their hearts.
- Taught — He is Teacher, lesson book and example at once. You are instructed in Him, not just by Him.
- In Jesus — the personal name points to His life on earth, the one place where the truth about man is seen whole.
- Put off, put on — the truth in Jesus is a change already made: the old man put off, the new put on. The renewing of the mind goes on now.
- Learned Christ — the Christian's guide is neither conscience nor law. It is a Person, and His walk is the pattern of ours.
[namely] your having put off according to the former conversation the old man which corrupts itself according to the deceitful lusts;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
and being renewed in the spirit of your mind;
Paul places this verse between two settled facts: the old self put off, the new self put on. In the middle stands one verb in the present tense — so what is still going on, and what part do we play?
Verses 22 to 24 form one statement about what we learned in Christ, and this verse is its middle clause.
The truth that we have been taught and learned in Him is that, in the cross, we have put off the old man and have put on the new. In the light of this great truth we are in our daily path, as a present thing, being renewed in the spirit of our minds. Instead of the mind of the flesh, which is hostile to God, we have a renewed mind marked by righteousness and holiness. It refuses evil and chooses good. The new man does not mean the old man changed, but an entirely new man; and the "renewing" refers to the daily life of the new man.
The tenses matter. One verb describes a process going on now; the other two describe an act done once.
Then comes the renewing of the spirit of the mind. We cannot have it unless we judge the old man. The wording hints that the renewal is a present process, going on step by step, as Christ fills the spirit of the mind. The putting off and putting on are not present things, but one act complete in itself, once for all.
One writer explains the word "new" with a picture from clothing.
We use the word "new" in English in two senses. We speak of a "new fashion," and of a "new coat." "Renewed in knowledge" in Colossians 3:10 is a completely new thing, like a new fashion. "Renewed in the spirit of your minds," in Ephesians 4:23, is like a new coat, constantly renewed by the grace and Spirit of God.
Commentators differ here. Some read this renewal as once-for-all and lasting, and place the daily renewal in other passages:
At the very start, God began His work in us — the work which He will carry on and complete. Then a renewing of an eternal character took place with us, done once and done for ever. Scripture names it in only one place, and there it happens in the spirit of the mind (Eph. 4:23). It uses a different word for renewing there, ananeō, for it is new in a lasting sense. In Romans 12:2 the word is anakainōsis, to be renewed in a fresh way.
The phrase points to what steers a person.
A man's mind leads him; and some ruling object governs his mind in its turn. Self is that object to the natural mind; to the renewed mind it is Christ. To live no longer to ourselves, but to Him who died for us and rose again, is the desire of the inner man. But direct exhortation helps this desire in its fight against the opposite pulls of the flesh. Obedient watchfulness on our part is to develop the mind of Christ within us.
The change goes deeper than behaviour:
He has been renewed in the spirit of his mind: the attitude of his mind has changed. Though the fleshly nature remains in him, this no longer dominates him. There is a new controlling factor.
Renewal has a practical side: we have to watch what fills our minds.
If we have put on the new man and are to show the features of Christ, we must guard our minds. What objects engage us? What things keep coming into our minds? Do we continue to think of the old path in which we walked before we believed the gospel? Do the interests of this world engage our thoughts, or do the interests of Christ engage them?
Paul describes this renewal in himself, and gives the reason it kept going.
"Though our outer self is wasting away," he writes, "our inner self is being renewed day by day" (2 Cor. 4:16); and what he says right after gives us the secret of this: "We look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen. For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal." Those unseen things took up all his attention, for Christ is the Centre of them all.
There is also a relief in this. Renewal is not performance:
Let us not try to look new, or even to feel new, but let us be renewed in the spirit of our minds.
- Settled — The putting off and the putting on are done once for all. Only the renewing stands in the present tense.
- Steered — The mind is led by whatever object rules it: self for the natural mind, Christ for the renewed one.
- Supplied — This renewal is not self-improvement. It is like a new coat, kept new by the grace and Spirit of God.
- Selective — Guard what engages your thoughts. That is the daily work.
- Sustained — The inner self is renewed day by day as we look at what is unseen and eternal, with Christ at the centre.
and [your] having put on the new man, which according to God is created in truthful righteousness and holiness.
The call in Ephesians 4 is not to improve the old life but to wear a new one, made by God and shaped like Him. Two questions follow. What is this "new man," which the ESV calls the "new self"? And why does the verse describe it in words that never fit Adam?
Everything turns on one word: "created."
Note the word "created"; God has caused to exist in me what was not there once. See Colossians 3:10: the new man is "renewed in knowledge after the image of Him that created him." The word suits Ephesians well, because this letter views man as dead… The new man loves righteousness and holiness of truth. He never wants to wallow in filth. The practical display of these features is the proof of life.
So reform is not what the verse means.
It is not just a change of practice. There is a thorough setting aside of the old corrupt man, a fresh spirit of the mind, and a putting on of the new man, created after God in righteousness and holiness of truth. It is not an improvement or "better ways," as people say, but a new creation; and we have taken this place.
A common assumption is that this verse describes what Adam was before he fell. Commentators reject that reading, and in doing so they define the words themselves.
There was neither holiness nor righteousness before the fall. The original state was something distinct from both. Adam was innocent, but not properly righteous or holy. God is holy. He sees what is bad and hates it. That is what holiness is, at least on its negative side. A righteous man judges what is contrary to justice, and hates it. An innocent man did not know good and evil as things in themselves. Of course, he knew it was his duty to obey God… He lost innocence, and we never get it back. But God renews us after the second Adam.
So the new creation is not a rewind.
There is no return to innocence — to the state in which Satan found man and deceived him. But God makes all things new… The new creation is the knowledge of good and evil, together with the life of God and His indwelling Spirit. As a result, we dwell in the light and love of God's nature.
Writers often quote this phrase as "righteousness and holiness of truth." One writer defines both words, and names what has not gone away.
The fleshly nature remains in him, but it no longer rules him. There is a new controlling factor: he has put on the new man, which is consistent with God's own nature. Righteousness is acting rightly in keeping with whatever relationship we may be in. Holiness is the love of what is good and the hatred of evil. But it is the truth of God that decides what is good and what is evil, not merely people's consciences or opinions.
"After God" is a statement about resemblance. It sets the standard for the new nature.
The new man is after God. That is, it is like God, and is "created in righteousness and true holiness."… The Christian, who has the truth as it is in Jesus, has put off the old man and put on the new man, which is after God. God Himself is the pattern, and it is in Christ that we learn what He is.
If God creates the new man, what is left for the believer to do? Writers answer: show what is already inside.
The putting off and the putting on are not a present process. They are the act in itself, once for all… They had the new man, of course. But this is putting on the new man in practice — the outward showing of the new man that was already inside them. It is well to bear in mind that this is "righteousness and holiness of truth." It is the truth here again that produces it.
That showing belongs in everyday life.
Then we have put on the new man. We now live according to the truth of new creation. There holiness and righteousness mark everything, and these features spring from the nature and character of God. What follows shows how practical the truth is. These great truths are to affect us in every relationship here, and in every detail of our lives.
- Created — God caused the new man to exist. It was not there before. This is not repaired behaviour or "better ways."
- Character — righteousness is acting rightly in every relationship. Holiness is loving good and hating evil. God's truth, not opinion, decides which is which.
- Contrast — Adam was innocent, not righteous or holy. We never get innocence back. The new creation joins the knowledge of good and evil to the life of God.
- Copy — "after God" means the pattern is God Himself, and it is in Christ that we learn what He is.
- Clothing — you already have the new man. The command is to wear it. What is inside then shows in every relationship and every detail of daily life.
Wherefore, having put off falsehood, speak truth every one with his neighbour, because we are members one of another.
Ephesians 4 turns from teaching to daily life. The first thing it deals with is how Christians speak to one another. The command not to lie is old. The reason given here is new: believers belong to one body.
The word translated "lying" reaches further than spoken untruths. One writer ties it to the new self, quoting an older translation of the verse just before:
In verse 23 the apostle speaks of the new man these believers had put on. He tells us that "after God" it was "created in righteousness and true holiness," or, literally, holiness of the truth. So all falsehood is shut out. It can have no part in this new creation of God… "lying," or "falsehood," means everything that has the character and nature of falsehood. It is abstract: what has this quality, not just the act of lying. We should keep this in mind, because it may search many of us who would never be caught telling outright untruths. A look, a gesture, our manner, unclear speech, evasion, compliments and many other things can fall under this sense of lying.
One writer traces lying to both our nature and its first author.
Lying is natural to us all. Men are said to go astray from the womb, speaking lies (Ps. 58:3). And even believers are ready to forget, when they twist the truth, that they are only following the devil, who did not stand in the truth and who became the originator of falsehood (John 8:44). We should not lie to anyone. But when we are all members of one body, how horrible it is to bring in deception, and so bring corruption into the body of Christ.
Another writer adds what lying reveals about the person telling it:
Lying is both an instrument of selfishness and a confession of personal wretchedness. No happy spirit can ever be a false one. It is the instinctive refuge of a guilty conscience. So it should have no place in a heart that the precious blood of Jesus has cleansed from an evil conscience. Falsehood and faith stand in essential opposition. Faith feeds on truth, because it trusts in God; while it is the absence of that trust that gives a lie its power over the human soul.
Most people can give reasons for honesty. The reason given here is not one of them.
We are too apt to treat falsehood on the human basis of honour. Many a man would not lie on moral grounds. Another would be too proud to tell a lie. A godly man, with a certain fear of God before his eyes, would not lie, because it is a practical denial of God. It is as good as saying that God does not hear… But this is not enough for a Christian. It matters greatly for our souls that we walk well and righteously. But the motive, character and extent must be according to God too.
Another writer sets this reason against the reasoning of moral philosophy:
Moral philosophy never gave a reason anything like the one given here… Who can imagine falsehood from the lips of Him whose words were the words of God, and whose truth was the truth of God? One who walked in His spirit and showed His life could no more speak falsehood.
The final clause supplies the logic. Deceiving another believer turns out to be self-injury.
Nothing could be more horrible than one member of the body trying to deceive the others. No one could be guilty of such wickedness if he had any real sense of the oneness of that spiritual body… But who ever saw the parts of a man's body fighting each other in bitterness and anger? If I deceive the members of the body, I deceive myself. If I quarrel with them, I quarrel with myself. For though we are many members, the body is one, and we are all one body in Christ.
The verse does not only forbid. It says what to speak instead.
If we speak truth, we speak what is helpful, what builds up, refreshes and encourages, and what is good in the sight of God… We should speak truth at all times because we have put off the old man. But there is one more reason for it here: the close and living links that bind us to all the saints.
One writer points out where this command stands in the letter.
Have you noticed, in the letter that reveals the church more than any other, which is the first command? … And read carefully every word that follows to the end of the chapter. If all believers walked according to these commands, division would be impossible.
- Put off — falsehood belongs to the old self, now laid aside. It is our inborn habit, and it comes from the devil, the first liar.
- Put on — truth is the voice of the new self, created after God in righteousness and holiness of the truth.
- Wider than words — a look, a gesture, evasion or a hollow compliment can all carry the character of falsehood.
- Higher motive — honour, morals, even the fear of God: none of these is the reason given here. Membership in one body is.
- Body logic — deceive a fellow member and you deceive yourself. Speak the truth, and division becomes impossible.
Be angry, and do not sin; let not the sun set upon your wrath,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
neither give room for the devil.
Paul has just told believers that anger itself is not always sin, but that it must not be carried into the night. This next line closes the door that anger leaves open, because the devil takes any room the flesh gives him.
One writer traces this command back to the first murder, then widens it far past temper:
This instruction follows naturally from the one before. An angry man is only a tool of Satan. Cain, who killed his brother in his anger, belonged to that wicked one. But in a far wider sense the devil is behind all that stirs up the evil feelings and passions of the old nature.
The devil asks for little at first. One writer shows where that small yielding ends:
Many have agreed to go a mile with Satan who never intended to go two. So Satan leads poor creatures down into the depths of sin by a winding staircase. They never see the bottom they are heading for. First he presents something that stirs a few thoughts. These thoughts set the affections on fire. The heated affections cloud the understanding. Now Satan dares to show himself a little more, and boldly urges the person to do what he would once have refused outright. Give no place to Satan! Not an inch, not in his first suggestions. A beggar who is modest outside the door will command the house once he is let in.
So what opens the door? One writer answers by naming what Satan can reach in us and what he cannot:
This verse shows us that we ought not to open the door to Satan. If it is the flesh that is acting, then the wicked one can touch us; but he cannot touch the new man, he cannot entice it (1 John 5:18). If I give way to a thought which is not of God, then I give place to Satan; if I give way to anger, the enemy is there. We are then hindered in service, troubled in prayer; and that is no surprise.
Anger is the example here, but it is not the only door. One writer points to a disciple who fell through another one:
We are warned that by acting in the flesh, whether in anger or in any other way, we open the door for the devil. Peter, by his self-confidence, made room for the devil to lead him into a denial of the Lord.
There is no neutral option. Either we hand the matter over to God and stay quiet, or the enemy takes what we keep holding:
The Lord says, "Vengeance is mine." Rather leave room for the wrath of God (Romans 12), and "give no opportunity to the devil" (Ephesians 4). But if you do not leave room for God's wrath, you will give room to the devil. Shall we lose anything by being quiet and taking things patiently?
(Older translations use one phrase, "give place," in both verses. That is the wordplay here.)
Resistance has a named means. The same writer points to where the victory comes from:
The Christian should keep this truth always in mind, and here he is encouraged to resist the devil. We overcome him by standing firm in the faith (1 Peter 5:9). He works most powerfully as the accuser of God's people, after first leading them into sin. But by the blood of the Lamb and the word of their testimony they will certainly prevail (Revelation 12:10-11).
The guard is to let nothing carry over to the next day. One writer tells of a long life lived under attack:
The Christian ends his day with a mind free from irritation. I once asked an aged Christian how he had been able to live so long, having been so often unjustly attacked. He replied that for forty-five years he had been able to leave everything with the Lord each day, in deep rest of mind. He did this despite the indignation often stirred in him by so much wickedness. This takes the opportunity away from the enemy, who has often taken advantage of an irritated spirit.
- The door. Anger held past sunset is the opening. The devil is behind all that stirs the passions of the old nature, and an angry man becomes his tool.
- The inch. He asks small and takes large. Let the beggar in and he commands the house, then leads you down a stair whose bottom you never see.
- The room. He cannot touch the new man. He works only where the flesh acts — through anger, or through self-confidence, as with Peter.
- The cost. Give him room and he hinders your service and troubles your prayer. The loss shows at once in daily Christian life.
- The remedy. Stand firm in the faith, and leave the matter with God each day. A mind at rest before nightfall takes the enemy's opportunity away.
Let the stealer steal no more, but rather let him toil, working what is honest with [his] hands, that he may have to distribute to him that has need.
One line about theft sits in a letter written to a thriving church, and it does more than tell a man to stop taking what is not his. It replaces the old habit with honest work, and gives that work a purpose the thief never had.
The ESV says "thief," but the term used covers more than that, and the warning went to a church that was doing well.
The word is not exactly "him who stole," but "the stealer." "Thief" would be too strong, and "he who stole" is too weak. The apostle was led to choose a term wide enough to take in every shade of such dishonesty. Do you think the caution needless? Beware, or your self-confidence and your slighting of any word God has written will trap you. The Spirit who inspired the letter clearly judged this warning necessary for all believers, not only for the Ephesians. Yet nowhere do we find a church more happy, flourishing, and blessed of God than the church in Ephesus.
The first readers came out of a world where taking was normal, and the command reaches further than burglary.
Remember that the early churches were made up of people just brought out of paganism, with all its horrors. Some of them were slaves, an oppressed and degraded class, and among them theft was common, with no guilt or shame attached to it. The exhortation also goes beyond open theft. In principle it condemns every kind of unfair advantage — the sort that even the fuller morality of our own day often condemns only weakly.
That principle lands on the ordinary workplace, where small dishonesty passes unnoticed.
For an employee to take small things from where he works is no less than stealing. Many do this without thinking, but a believer must take care never to take anything that does not belong to him.
Stopping is only half of it. The hands that once took must now work, and work at something honest.
Idleness is neither right nor safe. So the Spirit cheers and directs the man whose hands were once used in unworthy ways. So He opens a happy path where grace can prove its power, despite a dishonest nature and habit. Only the work must be good and honest. It is no use pleading that money gained dishonestly went to a kind or religious purpose! No job that goes against God's will is good for a Christian; he should give it up at once.
The verse names the goal of the work, and it is not survival. Kelly puts the contrast plainly in the same passage: the worldly man works in order to live; the Christian works in order to give.
People have often pointed to verse 28 as a display of the true energy of Christianity. The thief becomes a giver — and not only a giver out of his plenty, but one who works to earn the means of giving to others. What a wonderful transformation! Paul needed spiritual energy to stay up making tents for his own needs and for the needs of others — and he had not been a thief before his conversion. Only the Holy Spirit can produce active virtues and true devotion, the very opposite of what came before.
Commentators repeatedly note that the old rule against stealing would have been satisfied long before this verse is.
The thief is to become a worker and even a giver, for grace transforms. The law required the thief to pay back what he took, but grace makes him actively generous.
The same article puts the two principles side by side.
Law forbids evil; grace delights in doing good. Law is what God demands from man; grace is what God is in Himself.
The change asked for here mirrors what Christ Himself did, so the man once despised is handed the most honourable of errands.
That a man who once robbed others should become the willing and hardworking servant who hands out Christ's gifts to the needy — that would beautifully adorn the grace that saved him.
- Stop. The term covers every shade of dishonesty, and it went to a thriving church, so no believer is past needing it.
- Work. Idleness is neither right nor safe. The hands that once took must work, and work at something honest, because no kind use of the money excuses how it was gained.
- Give. Earning has a new aim. The world works to live; the Christian works to have something to hand to someone in need.
- Beyond. The law made a thief pay back what he took. Grace makes him generous, because law forbids evil while grace delights in doing good.
- Christ. The man who once robbed people now hands out Christ's gifts to the needy, and that is what grace looks like when it has done its work.
Let no corrupt word go out of your mouth, but if [there be] any good one for needful edification, that it may give grace to those that hear [it].
This verse puts a test on everything we say. The question is not just whether a word is clean, but whether it builds someone up and leaves grace with the person who hears it.
William Kelly reads the verse as covering a whole class of talk that most people would call harmless:
Throw worthless language away as you would throw away spoiled fruit. If such a word is on your tongue, let it go no further. Unclean talk we will find named and forbidden in the next chapter. Here I think the circle is wider. Many people would never speak or listen to dirty talk. Yet they often have to grieve over talk that does no good, and over those who approve it. It is better to say nothing than to speak when there is nothing good to build others up.
Darby asks which of two natures is doing the talking:
Here we see the contrast between the old self and the new. One or the other speaks: either it complains, or it gives thanks. The mature Christian would only speak to build others up. The new self, moved by the Spirit, will only take part in what builds up.
"As fits the occasion" adds a second filter after "good." A word can pass the first test and still fail the second:
The point is not only that corrupt talk stops. Positive good comes out — words that build up according to the need. Not only good language, but good for the occasion, and this assumes the Holy Spirit's power. We have often said things that were good in themselves but not needed at the time. I once saw a man give away food and medicines. The gifts were excellent, but he paid no attention to what the people receiving them actually needed.
Kelly draws the practical rule from the same clause: "The need measures the service, and love builds up instead of puffing up as knowledge does."
A. Pridham gives a test for what we say, and warns that talk which does not build up does harm:
Christian conversation calls for a constant remembrance that God is present. That memory holds back the outbursts of our sinful nature. Nothing that we cannot say with confidence in that presence is fit for the ears of one another. We would do well to remember that if our words do not edify, they are harmful. Whatever does not have the flavour of Christ has the flavour of the world. Talk like that does not strengthen God's building; it pulls it down.
T. B. Baines points to Christ Himself as the pattern:
It is not enough for the believer to avoid corrupt talk. That kind of talk belongs to "the old self, which belongs to your former manner of life and is corrupt through deceitful desires." The believer has put on the new self, and Christ is its perfect pattern. Did Christ merely refrain from evil in His conversation? No; His words, like His life, gave grace to those who heard. And so will the words of one who is in communion with Christ.
W. T. P. Wolston shows what careless talk does to the Holy Spirit:
If we walk carelessly, letting corrupt talk come out of our mouth, we will by that very thing grieve the Holy Spirit. When that happens, in His infinite mercy He brings a cloud over us. He gives us a sense of our folly and sin, and our conscience gives us no rest. The normal work of the Spirit is to show us the beauty of Christ and fill our hearts with Him. But if we grieve Him, He must turn our attention to ourselves and our sin. That lasts until we confess and He restores us.
- Source. One of two natures does the talking. Old self or new self — the words show which is in charge at that moment.
- Supply. Grace to give out comes from grace taken in. Time with the Lord feeds the mouth that builds others up.
- Standard. Not just clean words, but good ones — and good for this need, this hearer, this moment. Silence beats a word that meets no need.
- Scope. Wider than dirty talk. The same net catches useless and unwholesome speech. Words that fail to build are pulling down.
- Sequel. Careless speech grieves the Spirit. He must then turn us to our own sin instead of the beauty of Christ, until we confess.
And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, with which ye have been sealed for [the] day of redemption.
Paul gives this command among plain instructions about speech and temper. He bases it not on fear of loss but on the seal the Spirit has already set on us — which raises two questions: what grieves Him, and what changes when we do?
The command only makes sense if the Spirit is someone with feelings. One writer draws that conclusion directly from the wording:
A reference to Ephesians 4:30 may be helpful — "And grieve not the Holy Spirit of God, whereby you are sealed unto the day of redemption." The Holy Spirit is sometimes called the Third Person of the Trinity, but we must be careful to avoid any thought of inequality in the Godhead. The Holy Spirit is God — a blessed Person. We must not think of Him merely as an influence (great as His influence undoubtedly is) — one cannot grieve an influence!
The answer sits in the verses on either side. The list is unflattering, and much of it comes out of the mouth:
In what way can the Spirit be grieved? Every allowance of the flesh in the walk and ways of the believer grieves the Spirit. The verses around this passage show that we grieve the Spirit mostly through our tongues. The tongue lets out what is inside. So Scripture warns us against corrupt words from our mouths, and against bitterness, wrath, anger, shouting, evil speaking and malice. The believer must put these things far away. It is when we find the flesh in others that we so quickly find the flesh rising in ourselves.
Notice what Paul does not say. He never warns that grieving the Spirit could cost you your salvation. The seal is the reason for the warning, not the thing at risk:
Here we are exhorted on the settled ground of our being "sealed." He does not say, "Grieve not the Spirit, lest you be eternally lost." Such would not be in keeping with the true character of divine exhortation. We "are sealed," not as long as we behave ourselves, but "until the day of redemption." It is absolutely done, and this is the powerful reason why we are not to grieve the Holy Spirit.
(Mackintosh quotes an older Bible translation. The ESV reads "for the day of redemption.")
Redemption here still lies ahead. It is the day when Christ comes to set the body itself free. And the seal that reaches that day does not depend on us:
He comes to redeem the bodies of His saints, and redemption is never a question of human faithfulness, but of the power and grace of God. We have been sealed with the Holy Spirit of God "to the day of redemption" (Eph. 4:30). Every true believer is sealed with that great day in view. Our faithfulness, or lack of it, will greatly affect our place in the coming kingdom, but redemption lies on another plane altogether.
Grieving Him costs nothing eternal, but it costs something now. One writer turns the usual fear around: the misery of a believer out of fellowship proves the Spirit's loyalty, not His absence.
He will never withdraw Himself from the one sealed; that would be to falsify the whole truth of redemption. But when He is grieved, He does withdraw joy and power from the Christian's life. That lasts until the man confesses the fault and judges the state of mind that let the old nature act again. A Christian out of communion is wretched inside, even if he looks calm outside. The reason is not that the Spirit has abandoned him. It is that He will not abandon him, and so He must take away his happiness until the man returns to his Lord in broken confession.
Scripture has a second, similar-sounding command — "Do not quench the Spirit" (1 Thess. 5:19). The writers are careful to keep the two apart:
It is important to see that the exhortation does not refer to any conduct of the individual believer towards the Spirit who dwells in him; as, for instance, when it is said in Ephesians 4:30, "Grieve not the Holy Spirit of God, whereby you are sealed unto the day of redemption." But it refers to anything that, whether by human arrangement or the like, would interfere with His operation in gift in the Church.
For the Christian, the test of conduct has shifted. It is no longer a law to break, but a Person to consider:
What answers to this glory of Christ is the presence of the Holy Spirit dwelling in us, and sealing us for the day of redemption, when we shall be like Him and bear His image. So grieving the Spirit, not breaking the law, becomes the other measure of right and wrong for us.
- A Person. You cannot grieve an influence. The One who seals you as God's own is God Himself, and your life touches Him.
- A Seal. It holds for the day of redemption, not for as long as you behave well. Your security is the reason for care, never the thing at risk.
- A Day. The seal reaches to the redemption of the body at Christ's coming, and rests on God's power, not on human faithfulness.
- The Grief. Bitterness, temper, shouting, cutting words — the tongue does most of the grieving.
- The Cost. When He is grieved, He withdraws joy and power, but never Himself. The misery proves He stays; confession brings the joy back.
Let all bitterness, and heat of passion, and wrath, and clamour, and injurious language, be removed from you, with all malice;
Paul has just told the Ephesians not to grieve the Holy Spirit. Now he names what grieves Him: six things that start in the heart and end on the tongue. The list runs from settled sourness to open abuse, and it closes with the root of them all — malice.
One writer traces how each item grows out of the one before it, from an inward mood to the words that carry it:
To take them one by one: "all bitterness," I think, means every form of the sharp, unsparing mood which drives souls away instead of winning them. It makes the most of the real or imagined faults of others. The "wrath and anger" that follow are the outburst of passion, and the more settled vindictive resentment, which indulged sourness gives rise to. "Clamour and evil speaking" are their matching counterparts in words. All of them flow from the deep-seated fountain of "all malice," which the verse condemns last.
The word behind "evil speaking" — the ESV renders it "slander" — is the same one used for speaking against God:
In Scripture this does not always refer to speaking evil of God, though today the word is used only in that sense. The same Greek word is translated 'railing' in 1 Timothy 6:4 and Jude 9, and 'evil speaking' in Ephesians 4:31. It could well be translated that way in other places too.
Verse 31 belongs with verse 30. These tempers wound the very Spirit who marks believers out as God's own:
In the first part of the chapter the call to a worthy walk flows from a great truth: believers together are the dwelling-place of the Holy Spirit. Here we are reminded that each of us is sealed by the Spirit. God has marked us out as His own in view of the day of redemption by giving us the Spirit. We are to beware of grieving the Holy Spirit by allowing bitterness, the heat of passion, wrath and noisy clamour, injurious language and malice.
A short temper is often explained away as weakness. One writer refuses that excuse:
Verse 31 speaks of the things that result from nursing bad feeling in the heart — bitterness, wrath, anger, clamour, and evil speaking, together with malice. These sinful attitudes and practices are to be judged without sparing, and firmly put away. There is no place for them among the saints of God. We must not allow ourselves the slightest excuse for such things breaking out. They come from sin, not from weakness.
The damage does not stop with the person who holds them:
Where such things as these are allowed — and to some extent they are found everywhere among saints — how can the comfort of the Spirit be known? Allowing such things paralyses all spiritual perception. We no longer see how serious it is to have given the flesh such a loose rein, and discord and division take the place of harmony.
One writer shows what each of these cannot survive beside, and then answers the question of method:
No one whose heart is fed on the love of Christ can think or speak with bitterness. Nor can we noisily seek our own if we stay mindful of the kind of calling we have. Malice dies out when faith is strong. Who can be malicious if he remembers how it was that, when we were enemies, God reconciled us to Himself? Still, all these things are contrary to the new man, and our conscience condemns them without hesitation. Even so, we do not escape them without effort. We are told to put them away. And if it is asked how we may best do this — the answer is, by practising the opposite virtues in the energy of the Spirit.
The verse does not stand alone. It leads directly into kindness and forgiveness, and the standard for both is how God has already dealt with the reader:
As brought to God, I have learned what God is in His ways of grace... Did God come and clamour against you in justice? He sent His Son to give Himself for you, and has forgiven you. There is a man who wronged me. I am going to forgive him, as God forgave me — and, if I am near enough to God to do it, to show out what we have been learning as the joy of our souls.
- Root — Malice is the fountain. Inside it becomes bitterness, wrath and anger; out loud it becomes clamour and slander.
- Grief — These tempers wound the Spirit who sealed believers for the day of redemption. Verse 31 spells out verse 30.
- No excuse — They come from sin, not weakness. Judge them without sparing instead of explaining them away.
- Cost — Tolerated, they dull spiritual perception and turn harmony into discord and division.
- Cure — Effort is needed. Put them away by practising the opposite virtues, and forgive as God forgave you.
and be to one another kind, compassionate, forgiving one another, so as God also in Christ has forgiven you.
Paul has just told believers to stop the workings of the flesh. This verse names what should take their place — and the question it forces is not "how much should I forgive?" but "whose forgiveness am I copying?"
Dropping bad behaviour is only half of what this passage asks. Something positive has to take its place, and it comes from a source outside ourselves.
As with the earlier verses, it is not enough just to hold back the mind and workings of the flesh. There is the activity of good in Christ, and the Spirit both produces this in the Christian and calls for it. So the apostle adds, "Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you." Clearly, then, it is a question of showing grace; and the pattern of it all is God in Christ, not the law — holy, just and good though the commandment is.
Elsewhere in Scripture our forgiving is what we ask God to match. Here the comparison runs the opposite way, and one writer names the change.
"Forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you." This is a change from the Lord's Prayer — the prayer Jesus taught. There God measures Himself by you: "forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors." Here it is quite the reverse; I am to measure myself by God: "forgiving, as God has forgiven you."
Older English Bibles read "for Christ's sake". The ESV reads "as God in Christ forgave you". Commentators say this wording keeps the move on God's side. It does not make Christ someone who talks a reluctant God into forgiving.
The verse does not say, as the older translation does, "as God for Christ's sake has forgiven you." It says, "as God in Christ." Here the apostle presents God in the riches of His grace. God acts from no motive outside Himself, so nothing has to talk Him into forgiving. He acts from His own heart. What He does simply shows what He is, as we see it in redemption. But he presents Him this way as our standard, and so he says, "Be imitators of God as beloved children."
Another writer adds why God forgives at all:
God has not forgiven us only because Christ pleads for us. God Himself is the blessed Author of the forgiving grace shown to us in the person of the Lord Jesus and in His unmatched sacrifice of love. God delights to forgive, as seen in the sending of His beloved Son.
A practical difficulty follows: what if the person who wronged me has not admitted anything? One writer separates the heart's attitude from the spoken word of pardon.
This does not mean we must always say out loud that we forgive those who have sinned against us. But in our own hearts we are always to be in a state of forgiveness. We are never to hold on inside to the sin of a brother. No matter how badly someone sins against us, before God we are to forgive at once. Then, when the one who did the wrong comes and says, "I repent" (Luke 17), we are to grant him forgiveness.
Forgiveness means giving up a claim. One writer says the argument does not stop there.
To forgive another's wrongs is not enough for a Christian. No doubt it is a giving up of self, and so the fruit of divine grace. But in Ephesians God wants us to imitate His own ways as they have shone out in Christ… What has God done? He has forgiven you in Christ; and you are called to do the same. But was that all? Was there not positive love, far beyond forgiveness? And what is the display of love? Not the law, but Christ.
- Received first. God forgave you in Christ before He asked anything of you. Every command here rests on something already done.
- Measured by Him. You are not setting the standard and asking God to meet it — He set it, and you copy it.
- Sourced in Himself. His forgiveness needed no persuading; it came from His own heart, shown in the gift of His Son.
- Held in the heart. Forgive in your heart at once, even if the wrong is never admitted. Speak the pardon when repentance comes.
- Carried further. Forgiving is where imitating God starts, not where it stops. The next step is love — the love Christ showed by giving Himself.
Be ye therefore imitators of God, as beloved children,
Here the letter turns from what God has done for us to how His children should live. The standard is one short line: copy God. How can anyone do that, and what keeps such a call from crushing us?
The verse does not stand alone. It looks back to the end of chapter 4, where God has already acted towards us in kindness.
The "therefore" of the first verse connects this portion with the last verse of the preceding chapter. God has acted towards us in kindness and grace, and now we should act towards one another as God has acted towards us. So we are urged to be imitators of God "as dear children". We are not to try to imitate God to become children, but because we are children. Walking as "dear" children implies a walk governed by affection. A servant may obey correctly because the law requires it, but a child should obey out of love. We are not servants but sons.
Reverse that order and it falls apart. Copying God to earn something from Him is a mistake, not a weaker kind of devotion.
God becomes the pattern of our imitation the moment we accept, by faith, the gracious declaration of His love to us in Christ. To aim at that likeness while still knowing nothing of His free forgiveness of our sins is nothing but proud folly from a darkened mind. Only those born of God can really imitate what God does.
There are two kinds of copying, and only one of them is meant here.
The imitation enjoined is not artificial but natural. Here are children playing in the market-place. They hold an imaginary court. This little girl, dressed in cheap finery, is pretending to be a queen. She copies a queen's manners as best she can, but it is all crude and put on. Nearby a small boy is watching his father. Soon friends smile and remark how like his father he is. He hardly knows he is doing it, and it is completely natural: he is his father's son, with his father's life and nature. Now it is as children of God that we are called upon to be imitators of God.
The law made demands on man. This command stands on different ground.
What a mighty principle opens up here for believers! What limits can there be if we are urged to imitate God Himself! This is not a demand pressed on man, as the law was, when man stood before God on his own responsibility as a creature. God has revealed Himself in grace. Still He is God and no one else. And since He has given us His own nature, there could be no lesser or lower standard. That would dishonour Him and the very grace He has shown us.
The title in the verse is not a description we earned. It is one that belonged to Another first.
Having accepted us in the Beloved, the title which naturally could be only His is now by grace applied to all His saints. It is as "dear children" that we are called to show to one another some faint reflection of that love which He has so abundantly bestowed on us in Christ.
More than a title, it is God speaking, and the tone of the word carries its own message.
If He says to me, "Dear child," what a thought I have of Him and what a wonderful condition I am in! Suppose a father says, "Dear child" — the expression gives consciousness of the love. He may have done all kinds of things for me, but the very word conveys to me where I am.
The command names God as the model, yet the next verse points to Christ. Writers hold both together.
We are light in this way — as His imitators. This light has come to us in the person of Christ, so we keep our eye on Him. We are to "walk in love, as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us." So it is God we imitate. But it is Christ who brought the knowledge of God to us, and that makes Christ our pattern. He is our light, because He has faithfully and perfectly presented God before our soul.
This gets practical fast. One writer points to how God speaks about King Asa in the Bible's record of his life.
Asa's history reveals his weaknesses. God, in His comments on his character, gives no hint of them. He loves to commend whatever is lovely in His servants' lives, and only when necessary exposes their failures and follies. May we in this, as in all things else, be "imitators of God"!
- Forgiven first. The word "therefore" ties the command to what God has already done for us — we imitate God because we are children, not to become them.
- Given the name. God calls us "dear children." That one word carries His love and tells us where we stand.
- Given the nature. Only those born of God can truly copy Him; the imitation is meant to be as unforced as a small boy resembling his father.
- No ceiling. God has given us His own nature, so no lower standard would fit. The law made claims on man; this call rests on grace.
- Seen in Christ. God is the model. Christ makes that model visible — down to small things, like praising what is good in others instead of exposing their faults.
and walk in love, even as the Christ loved us, and delivered himself up for us, an offering and sacrifice to God for a sweet-smelling savour.
Paul has been urging his readers to imitate God. Now he shows what that looks like: Christ's own self-giving, described in the language of the altar — which raises the question of how much of it we can copy.
The command is not to work up a feeling foreign to us. It is to let out what is already there.
We are to walk in love. This is not natural to us as the children of Adam, but it is natural to us as born of God, for God is love. Walking in love simply shows the Divine nature in practice. So it adds, "as Christ loved us," because in Christ the Divine nature appeared in all its fullness and perfection.
The order matters. What we are comes first; how we walk follows from it.
If we are accepted in the Beloved, we are now urged to "walk in love" (Eph. 5:2). We ought to walk in a way that matches our high place. Responsibility flows from relationship... But to imitate anyone, we must know that person. Now God has made Himself known to us. He has placed us in His presence and given us His mind.
The verse traces a movement: love reaches us, and then returns to its source as self-sacrifice.
The burnt offering pictures Christ — He freely offered up His life to God as a sweet savour... When divine love comes down here, it always returns upward as self-sacrifice. God acts in love; Christ walked in love; and divine love acting in a person offers itself to God as a sweet savour.
Two little words carry the weight of the verse. One points to us; the other points higher.
He gave Himself for us, yet His blessed offering and sacrifice was to God. As an offering, it speaks of the value of the gift in God's eyes. As a sacrifice, it shows how great a thing Christ gave up for the glory of God. His sacrifice has the character of both the peace offering and the burnt offering. The peace offering brings us into sweet agreement with God in Christ, and the burnt offering rises to God to delight His heart of infinite love.
The Bible does not always describe Christ's death in these terms. Set this verse beside another, and the difference stands out.
Here we see the sacrifice of Christ on its burnt offering side. It was a sweet smelling savour, and — blessed be His name — it was "for us." In 1 Peter 2:24 we get the trespass offering side of His cross. There "a sweet savour" could not be said. He bore our sins, and drank the cup of divine wrath that our sins deserved.
The verse sets Christ as pattern, but not every part of His death is open to imitation.
The death of Christ was a propitiatory offering, and we cannot follow Him in that. But we can imitate Him in the love that would lead us to lay down our lives for the brothers and sisters (1 John 3:16). Paul mentions two saints of God who risked their own necks for his life. If one risks his life for another, that is the same as laying it down.
This standard reaches past anything the law asked, and it comes with a promise about our own small acts.
Such love goes far beyond what the law demands, that a man love his neighbour as himself. Christ did more, for He gave Himself to God for us. This is the love we are asked to imitate... In its little measure, like the infinite love of Christ, it will go up as a sweet savour to God.
- Down — Love begins at God's side, not ours. Walking in love lets our new nature show itself in practice.
- Up — Divine love comes down to us. When it acts in a person, it turns back upward as self-sacrifice offered to God.
- To — The gift was for us, but the offering was to God. Christ gave Himself up for the glory of God.
- Fragrance — This verse shows the burnt offering side of the cross, which delights God's heart. The sin-bearing side is different: there Christ drank the cup of wrath.
- Echo — We cannot repeat the propitiation. But we can love enough to lay down our lives, and even that small measure rises to God as a sweet savour.
But fornication and all uncleanness or unbridled lust, let it not be even named among you, as it becomes saints;
Paul has just held up Christ's self-giving love as the pattern for the believer's walk. He turns straight to the ugliest sins of the body and of money. Why must these sins not merely be avoided, but never even mentioned?
Chapter 5 opens with a call to copy God and to love as Christ loved. Then comes a guard. Close warmth among believers carries its own danger.
Still, the sweeter and more blessed it is, the closer it stands to evil — unless divine power and self-judgment keep it. It brings people together. It awakens spiritual affections. But what begins in the Spirit may end in corruption of the flesh, as we see at Corinth... These lusts of the flesh were not merely forbidden; they were not even to be named. They were God's holy ones, saints; and the question now was what is fitting for saints, not merely for men.
The warning does not call for a joyless life.
There is danger even among the saints of God. The devil can come in and turn love between believers into a snare. He does this not only when we allow open evil to break out, but through the unjudged leaning towards it... The Lord in no way forbids the happy cheerfulness which He loves in His saints. He does not call us to be monks. That is man's way of keeping the flesh under restraint, and only another form of self. We may have self in a legal form and self in a lax form. Under any form it is not Christ, and the only thing which God values now is Christ.
The ban reaches past behaviour to conversation, and for a reason.
The things listed in verse 3 appeal to instincts rooted deep in man's fallen nature. We do well to avoid the things themselves, and also the contamination that comes from thinking about them. We cannot talk about them without thinking of them, even if we condemn them in our talking. Therefore let us not talk about them.
It also settles how sin should be confessed in public:
The apostle Paul's confession in 1 Timothy 1:13 is a model. It is not "sharing" but a confession meant to praise the grace of God in reaching such a sinner as he was. Notice that his confession does not go into indecent details. He speaks only of how he opposed God — his blasphemy against God's truth and the harm he did to His people. As for confessing sexual matters in public, Scripture emphatically forbids this.
Silence is not softness. Talking about these sins lightly makes them look small. Older translations render the ESV's "sexual immorality" as "fornication":
This means that we should not mention these things frivolously and so make little of them... The Bible does not use the word fornication only for prostitution. It covers all sexual relations outside marriage — even where the couple mean to marry, and even if it happens only once.
The third word in the verse looks out of place beside the first two. The Greek word is pleonexia, "to have more":
It is not limited to money, and it is often linked with open wickedness. The word means "desiring more than is necessary," and so "reaching out to grab." That is why it is applied to the lusts of the flesh. It is declared to be idolatry (Col. 3:5).
That is why greed and immorality keep appearing side by side:
Elsewhere (Eph. 5:3; Col. 3:5), and especially in the first passage, covetousness and fornication are spoken of together. Fornication really springs out of covetousness, as the tenth commandment had already taught.
The measure is not public decency but identity. The order matters: the walk flows from what believers already are.
Since believers are "called saints" (Rom. 1:7; 1 Cor. 1:2), their ways should be such as are suitable for saints... They are not called to become saints by a holy walk. They are urged to a holy walk because God's calling has already made them saints... How unfit it is for people set apart like this to walk in uncleanness! And how wrong for followers of Him who was rich, and became poor for our sakes, to be clutching at the riches of this world!
The title itself carries the duty. A saint is "one set apart for God," and Scripture assumes "there is a line of conduct that is fitting for saints" (Morrish Bible Dictionary).
- Position first. The verse follows the call to walk in love as Christ loved us. Holiness here answers grace already received; it does not earn it.
- Standard second. You do not become a saint by clean living. You live as what God has already called you.
- Scope third. Covetousness stands beside immorality. Both grasp for more than God has given, and Scripture calls that greed idolatry.
- Speech fourth. These sins must leave our talk, not just our conduct. We cannot discuss them without dwelling on them, so keep the details out of public.
- Balance last. Silence about filth is not gloom. The Lord loves cheerfulness in His people. Monk-like rules only dress up self; the one thing God values now is Christ.
and filthiness and foolish talking, or jesting, which are not convenient; but rather thanksgiving.
Paul has just warned against immorality and greed. Now he turns to how God's people talk. This verse is not about crimes but about conversation — dirty talk, silly talk, and clever talk. It does not only ban them. It names a replacement.
"Out of place" is a word about fitness. Older translations read "not convenient." One writer explains it and ties the whole demand back to who believers already are:
They are not called to become saints by a holy walk. They are urged to a holy walk because they are saints through God's calling. The apostle says these things "are not convenient" — that is, not suitable. … It is not only in deed, but in word, that believers are to act in a way that suits saints.
The three words in this verse are milder than the sins listed just before them. That is exactly the point — the warning follows the evil into its socially acceptable disguise, and then supplies its opposite:
He does not limit his warning to unrestrained immorality, or to the greedy desire for whatever pleases man. He extends it to unholy language too, whether openly shameful or hidden under a veil of refinement… Here again he brings in not only the absence of what is improper in the Christian, but the positive side as well: the heart turns to God's goodness, and that breaks out in thanksgiving.
At first glance the verse sounds like a ban on laughter. Commentators say it is not:
The Lord in no way forbids the happy cheerfulness which He loves in His saints. He does not call us to be monks, which is man's way of keeping the flesh under restraint, and only another form of self. Self can take a strict, rule-keeping form, and self can take a loose form. In any form it is not Christ, and the only thing God values now is Christ.
The test is a Person, not a rule:
In the presence of Christ we will find joking unsuitable. This does not mean that the one who walks in the light of God's face is unhappy. No cloud hangs over the joy of the person who is in God's presence. But such a Christian feels which things do not suit someone called to imitate God.
One writer explains why even "foolish talk" is banned. The mouth drags the mind with it, even when the speaker means to condemn:
Things like those listed in verse 3 appeal to instincts deeply rooted in man's fallen nature. We do well to avoid the things themselves, and also the stain that comes from thinking about them. We cannot talk about them without thinking of them, even if we condemn them as we talk. So let us not talk about them… A Christian is neither a fool nor a jester, so let us not appear as either in our conversation.
The hardest item to give up is the one everyone admires, and dropping it has a cost:
We will soon find that refusing to join in foolish talking and jesting will bring plenty of scorn, and make us a spectacle. A quick wit or a clever reply is a natural ornament! But harmless as it may seem to us, there is very grave danger of defilement lurking here.
The verse ends with an exchange, not a vacuum:
Scripture is positive as well as negative; if folly is not to flow from our lips, giving of thanks should. Happy occupation! The heart is so satisfied with divine grace, and so taken up with Christ, that out of its abundance thanksgiving wells up to Him.
The trade is not joy for gloom. It is one kind of happiness for another:
Nothing is truly pleasant to the Spirit but Christ. In a saint, joy in the Holy Spirit should take the place of the thoughtless merriment that is natural to us. We are to trade the mirth that so often leaves a sting for that pure and precious gladness in which God Himself has a part.
Guarding the lips is not enough. Speech only reports what is already in the heart:
What is the remedy? Here it is — a heart filled with the peace of Christ, the word of Christ, Christ Himself. Nothing else will do. We must begin with the heart. Where the heart is fully occupied with heavenly things, we will make very short work of every attempt at evil speaking, foolish talking and jesting.
- Fitting — "Out of place" means unsuitable. The standard is not a rule list but what suits people God has already called saints.
- Refined — The warning reaches past open filth to polished, witty forms of the same evil.
- Free — Cheerfulness is not banned. Life in God's presence is happy, and harsh self-denial is only self in another form.
- Costly — A quick wit is an ornament people admire. Laying it down brings scorn; keeping it risks defilement.
- Exchanged — Thanksgiving takes the empty place. It starts in a heart occupied with Christ, not in guarded lips.
For this ye are [well] informed of, knowing that no fornicator, or unclean person, or person of unbridled lust, who is an idolater, has inheritance in the kingdom of the Christ and God.
Paul names impurity and greed, and then calls greed idolatry. That raises two hard questions. Why is wanting more treated as worship? And what does it mean to have no inheritance in the kingdom?
Two different Greek words for knowing stand side by side in the opening phrase. One writer explains what each one adds.
In Ephesians 5:5 the true reading brings both Greek words for knowing together: iste (from oida) and ginoskontes. Knowledge gained from outside had passed into inward, conscious knowledge. It was what they were well aware of, and knew. In the way the words are used, that process could not run the other way.
The word covers something far more ordinary than theft — which is exactly what makes it dangerous.
Covetousness involves no dishonesty. It is not even hard or sharp dealing. It is no more than the desire for more — the very spring of modern effort, the drive to better yourself that everyone is urged to have, from the workman to the millionaire. So the creature becomes the object, not God; and so covetousness is called idolatry. It is man looking down, not up in dependence on God.
Why does Paul call a greedy person an idolater? One writer answers by defining what an idol is.
You do not need to bow down to a piece of wood or stone to be an idolater. Whatever commands the heart is an idol. Giving the heart to that thing is idolatry, and the one who gives it is an idolater… What is covetousness? It is either a desire to get more, or the love of what we have… But whether it is the desire to grasp or the desire to hoard, either way it is idolatry.
It is easy to read a list of sins as a description of other people. One writer turns the list back on the readers.
These are things for use. They are exhortations, not merely to apply to other people, to measure them by, but to take home to ourselves. They are for saints, not for the world. No doubt we find the evil warned against in the world. Our hearts ought to feel for those who will have no inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. But remember that the main purpose of the Holy Spirit was to warn and guard the saints themselves.
Some hear such a warning as a threat to the freeness of forgiveness. One writer answers by pointing to God's unchanging nature.
It is most important to remember this. Let sovereign grace do all it will. Let it reach the worst. Let it cleanse the most defiled. Still God's moral ways do not bend. His nature does not change. He hates and can never tolerate wickedness. His love may find — and has found — a glorious solution to that difficulty in the cross of Christ. But God and sin can never walk or live together.
Does this verse put a believer's place in doubt? One writer answers by separating standing from conduct.
The believer is a joint-heir with Christ, for in Him "we have obtained an inheritance." But to have a part in the kingdom of Christ and of God, our character must suit it. Seen in Christ, we are already fit to share the inheritance of the saints in light. Here, though, the question is not so much one of standing as of conduct.
Another writer draws the line between a fall and a way of life:
A child of God may fall and commit some of these things, but no true believer will continue to live in them.
This verse looks ahead. It says both what such people will miss and what the kingdom will be like.
Those marked by uncleanness, covetousness and idolatry will not only miss the blessings of the coming kingdom of Christ and of God. Being disobedient to the gospel, they will also come under the wrath of God. Unlike this present evil world, the kingdom of God will be a place where love rules and lust is shut out. What will be true of the coming kingdom should mark the family of God today.
- Know it. Paul points to what the readers already know. Facts they were taught have become inward certainty.
- Name it. Covetousness is the desire for more. It needs no dishonesty, so it passes for healthy ambition.
- Face it. Whatever commands the heart is an idol. Grasping or hoarding, greed puts something in God's place.
- Own it. The warning is written to believers to guard them, not handed to them as a measuring stick for the world.
- Match it. Grace has not changed God's nature. The kingdom is where love rules and lust is shut out, and that future should shape life now.
Let no one deceive you with vain words, for on account of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience.
Paul has just listed sins that shut a person out of the kingdom. He knows someone will always say it is not that serious. This verse calls that talk deception. Then it gives the reason God's wrath falls on a whole class of people.
The deception is not crude. It comes dressed as reasoning and learning. Its work is to make sin look appealing.
The apostle warns us not to let empty words deceive us. So men with their philosophy and science will excuse lust. They try to dress sin up in poetry and romance to make it look attractive. Even so, because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the children of disobedience. The "sons of disobedience" are those who have heard the truth but have rejected it.
One version of the empty words turns grace into a licence to sin. Paul answers it without a long argument.
Man's empty philosophy might indeed try to twist the teaching of grace into permission for immorality. But the apostle warns them against such corruptions of the truth... There is no need for a long argument. This teaching approves the very practices that bring God's judgment on the children of disobedience. Its emptiness is clear at once.
The phrase is not a label for one act. It is a family word. Some quotes here use the older wording, "children of disobedience."
Sons are those who show the typical or distinctive traits of their fathers. Scripture often uses this idea of a child standing for a parent in moral matters. So the "sons of disobedience" (Eph. 2:2) are those whose conduct shows disobedience as plainly as a son resembles a father.
Commentators differ on how wide the word "disobedience" reaches. Smith ties it to hearing the gospel and refusing it. Others read it as covering a whole way of life. One writer points to Saul, Israel's first king:
Here God explains the reason for His final judgment on Saul. It is the same reason as His judgment on every sinful man: disobedience and departure from God. And these are the very words we find again in Ephesians 2, the chapter that declares the sinner's condition of death: "sons of disobedience" and "without God in the world."
Those words matter. This wrath answers the sins Paul has just listed. It does not fall only on people who refuse the message about Christ.
We think it very unsound and dangerous to teach that people will only be judged for rejecting the gospel. "For you may be sure of this, that everyone who is sexually immoral or impure, or who is covetous (that is, an idolater), has no inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. Let no one deceive you with empty words: for because of these things [and not merely because of their rejection of the gospel] the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience."
The threat is not aimed at the believer. But the fact that such wrath is real is exactly what makes the next command urgent.
Men might deceive them with empty words. They might chatter about Christian liberty and anything else. But "because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience." He is speaking, of course, of the world, and not of Christians. He does not threaten Christians with the wrath of God. At the same time, this wrath really does come upon the children of disobedience, and that makes the warning deeply solemn. Christians, therefore, must not be in any sense partakers with them. There must be the fullest possible separation.
So what about someone who claims to be a Christian and lives in these sins?
The firm and decisive way in which the Apostle draws the line in verses 5 and 6 is very striking. The kingdom of Christ and of God is marked by holiness. The unholy are outside that kingdom and subject to the wrath of God. There was to be no mistake about this. Then as now, some wished to blur this sharp line and excuse unholy living. Other scriptures show that a true believer may fall into any of these sins. But no true believer is marked by any of them. Whatever people say about themselves, no one marked by such sins should be counted a true Christian.
- Empty words — the lie is polished, not crude. Philosophy, talk of liberty, and grace turned into permission all make sin look attractive.
- Real wrath — no long argument is needed. The very things people excuse are the things God's judgment comes for.
- Real family name — "sons of disobedience" means people whose conduct copies disobedience the way a son resembles his father. It is a character, not a slip.
- Real deeds — the wrath comes "because of these things." God judges people for what they have done, not only for turning down the gospel.
- Real separation — God does not threaten His children with this wrath. Its certainty presses them to share in none of it. A believer may fall into such sins, but is never marked by them.
Be not ye therefore fellow-partakers with them;
This one-line command hangs on a single word: therefore. It looks back at the sins that bring God's judgment, and it asks what people who have been delivered from those sins should now do about the people who still live in them.
Paul has just said that God's wrath falls on the children of disobedience because of the sins he has been listing. Verse 7 draws the conclusion. One writer answers those who twist grace into an excuse for sin:
Human philosophy might try to twist the teaching of grace into permission for immorality. But the apostle warns them against such corruptions of the truth. There is no need for a long argument. You can see at once how empty such teaching is. These were the very practices that bring God's judgment on the children of disobedience. They had been in that condition themselves. But God called them out of it. How could He bear to see them walk in the very acts He delivered them from?
The word "them" points back to a named group. One commentator explains who earns that name:
God's wrath is revealed from heaven against all the unrighteousness of people who suppress the truth by their unrighteousness (Rom. 1:18). It hangs above all over those who keep sinning against the holy light of gospel truth. Such people are called here the children of disobedience (or unbelief). True faith and willing obedience are one and the same in principle, and this shows it. Faith is an active principle, and works by love. Men hear the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ but do not receive the truth in the love of it. That is when they become liable to the special condemnation announced here.
The verse could have ended with the practices. It ends with people. That last word carries weight:
Whatever they claim to be, they have no part in the kingdom of God. So we, who have an inheritance in the kingdom, can have no part with them. This is what verse 7 so plainly states. Notice too that the last word of that verse is them. We are not only to avoid the sins, but also to avoid all participation with the sinners. The persons as well as the evils are to be avoided. The difference between us and them is as great and as distinct as that between light and darkness.
The warning is not theory. One commentator names the excuse people use, and the places these things reach us today:
People may assume that because God is love, the grace of God is indulgent toward these sinful things, but it is not so. These very things are why the wrathful judgment of God falls on the children of disobedience (v.6). Will a believer let himself share in any way with such people? These things are so glaring today on radio, TV and in newspapers and magazines. Saints must be very careful and watchful against such contamination.
The refusal in this verse is not built on rule-keeping. It rests on what the believer has become:
You know that just doing what is right would never satisfy your renewed conscience. You must have the springs of action purified. It is what Christ has done that asks it of you. These unclean things, as I read in verse 3, do not suit saints. Am I to put uncleanness aside because it is uncleanness? No; I put it aside because it does not suit saints... I refuse to take part in uncleanness, because I was in darkness, but now I am transformed. I am a new creature, a child of light.
Refusing to share is where this passage starts, not where it stops:
It is not enough for our souls to refuse to be partakers with the children of disobedience, as in verses 6, 7. We must have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather even expose them (v. 11). It is all part of our wonderful place and responsibility as children of light. This is not law, which only condemns by a standard applied from outside. It is an inward divine capacity that searches everything. Love is its source and its end, yet it spares evil even less than law does, and it brings in good by the Holy Spirit in Christ.
- Cause. God's wrath falls on these very practices. To share in them is to stand where judgment lands.
- Called. Believers were once in that condition. God called them out, and He will not bear to see them go back.
- Company. The verse ends with them — the people are to be avoided, not just the sins.
- Character. The refusal flows from a new nature, not a rulebook: once darkness, now a child of light.
- Continue. Not sharing is only the beginning. The light also exposes the works of darkness, and brings in good.
for ye were once darkness, but now light in [the] Lord; walk as children of light,
Paul has just warned the Ephesians about the sins that once filled their lives. Here he says why those sins no longer fit them: they are not just in a new place, they are new people, and their walk must match that.
The apostle does not say the Ephesians were in the dark. He says they were darkness. One writer presses how total that condition was:
Now we were what is contrary to His character, we were darkness; not only in the dark, but darkness in our nature, the opposite of God who is light. Not one ray of what He is was found in our will, our desires, our understanding. We were morally destitute of it.
The problem was never only ignorance. Another writer names what the old nature loved, and what has taken its place:
It is not simply that we were in the dark, ignorant of God. Our nature itself was darkness, because it found its pleasure in everything that is against God. Now we are partakers of the divine nature, and that nature is marked by love and light.
The verse does not say only that we are light. It adds the words that carry the whole weight — in the Lord. Our position, and the responsibility that follows it, both start there:
The Lord was light in Himself; we are not light in ourselves, but in the Lord. And the exhortation is, "Walk as children of light." God has taken us out of darkness. Think of it. The more we feel in our souls that we are in the light, as God is in the light, the more we will want a walk that suits it. But we measure all responsibility by our relationship. We are in the light to start, and our responsibility flows from that fact.
The verse does not tell them to become light. It tells them to walk as children of light. The order matters:
Since the change is so complete, the word is "walk as children of light." Be consistent with what you are, not merely with what you ought to be. We are light — yes, light in the Lord. That is at once the ground, the character, and the measure of what suits our ways as Christians. So let us walk accordingly. How comforting is the call of grace to holy ways! God is light, and in Him is no darkness at all. If we are His children, we are children of light. How completely law disappears as the motive or the pattern of our walk.
The position cannot be lost, but the walk can fall out of step with it. One writer pictures it with sunshine:
If you are outside today, you will be in the sunshine, as long as the sun is shining. You can turn your back on the sun so that you do not see it, but you are still walking in the sunshine, even if you do not enjoy it. This is what can happen in our lives. We cannot return to a walk in darkness because we have been taken out of darkness into His wonderful light, but we can walk as children of darkness. That is why it is said, "Walk as children of light". We are to walk in accordance with the position which we have been given by grace.
The next verse tells us what this walk produces, and where it comes from:
But we are no longer darkness, nor in darkness, but are children of light: the fruit of the light — that is, the practical result of knowing God fully revealed — should be shown in all "goodness and righteousness and truth."
This also gives the believer his motive for refusing the sins listed earlier in the chapter:
I refuse to take part in uncleanness, because I was in darkness, but now I am transformed. I am a new creature, a child of light.
- Were. Not in darkness only — darkness itself, with not one ray of God's character in the will, desires or understanding.
- Are. Light, but never light in ourselves: light in the Lord, sharing the divine nature and loving what He loves.
- Walk. Be consistent with what you are, not merely with what you ought to be. The position sets the measure of the path.
- Bear. The fruit of the light is all that is good and right and true — the practical outcome of knowing God as He has revealed Himself.
- Refuse. The believer turns down impurity not just because it is wrong, but because it does not belong to a new creature, a child of light.
(for the fruit of the light [is] in all goodness and righteousness and truth,)
The call just before this verse is to walk as children of light. Verse 9 breaks in to say what that light bears: goodness, righteousness and truth. The wording also raises a well-known question — fruit of the light, or fruit of the Spirit?
The verse does not start a new subject. It pauses the command to walk as children of light. Then it names what that walk bears, and what it shuts out.
Verse 9 explains what will shine out. The correct reading is not "the fruit of the Spirit," but "the fruit of the light." Three words sum up that fruit — goodness, righteousness, truth. The opposites — evil, iniquity, unreality — should be entirely shut out of our lives. Walking this way as children of light, we prove what is pleasing to God. We prove it not by reasoning, but by practical experience. We put things to the test, and so learn it for ourselves.
These same three qualities do mark the Spirit's work. That may be how the older reading arose. But the contrast being drawn here settles the wording.
No doubt these are the marks of the Spirit's gracious work. That may be what put "the Spirit" in place of "light" in the common text. But there can be no reasonable question that the true thought and word in verse 9 is "the light"... In Galatians 5 it is the fruit, not of the light, but of the Spirit. There it stands against the works of the flesh... Here the contrast is not with legal tendencies and the workings of flesh, which the law both provokes and condemns. It is with the darkness which we once were when we were without the Lord.
The three words cover different ground: how we treat others, how we meet our duties, and how honest we are.
Verse 9 is a parenthesis. Light produces goodness, righteousness and truth. Goodness is that which actively seeks the good of others. Righteousness is carrying out properly the duties of whatever relationship we are in. Truth is transparent honesty.
The order matters. Goodness heads the list, and righteousness and truth come after it.
We are to walk in keeping with the position grace has given us. So we are called to something wonderful: to walk as children of light and show the fruit of light, which is in all goodness. This has the character of love. Only then do righteousness and truth follow. These would be more the characteristics of light, but goodness leads us to the love of God.
No one produces these qualities on his own. They are fruit, and fruit needs a root.
The works of darkness bear no fruit. But those who walk in the light, as He is in the light, bear precious fruit. Goodness, righteousness and truth are out of reach for the natural man. They are found in the way of those whom the Spirit, through faith, shapes into practical likeness to Christ. He is Himself the essence and fulness of these things. By staying close to Him, we reflect what we enjoy in Him. Our fruit, whether scanty or abundant, must savour of the Root that bears us.
So the fruit of light is not just something pleasant in a person. It carries the character of light itself, and light never leaves evil alone.
This is all part of our marvellous place and responsibility as children of light. It is not law, which only condemns by an outward standard applied from without. It is an inward and most searching divine capacity. Love is its source and its end, yet it spares evil even less than the law does, and it brings in good by the Holy Spirit in Christ... Light by its nature reveals itself and everything else. This is just as true in spiritual things as in nature.
- Light, not Spirit — the true reading is "the fruit of the light." Galatians 5 sets the Spirit's fruit against the flesh; here the contrast is with the darkness we once were.
- Light gives — the position comes first; the walk keeps true to what grace has made us.
- Light bears — goodness seeks the good of others. Righteousness meets the duties of each relationship. Truth is plain honesty.
- Light roots — none of this is native to us. The fruit tastes of the Root that bears it, and it grows by staying close to Christ.
- Light reveals — the fruit that pleases God also shows up the works of darkness, because revealing is what light does.
proving what is agreeable to the Lord;
Paul has just called the Ephesians light in the Lord, and this verse tells them what that light is for. So how does a believer find out what pleases the Lord when no rule covers the situation?
This verse does not stand alone. Commentators read verse 9 as a side note, so that verse 10 links straight back to the call to walk as children of light. One writer also says why God's will can seem hard to find.
This verse is connected with what is said about light in verse 8; verse 9 is in parentheses. This is what we have to learn in our conduct. People often say it is hard to find out the will of God. But this is because we are not ready to face difficulties, and then we cannot find out His will. In this verse we see the state of soul that loves to please. It enters into the spirit of the walk, and it takes in the wishes of God, so as to be acceptable to Him.
This Greek word turns up in other letters too, translated in different ways.
euarestos (literally 'well-pleasing,' from eu, 'well,' and aresko, 'to please') means 'acceptable' to God, Rom. 14:18; 'agreeable' to the Lord, Eph. 5:10; 'well-pleasing' to Him, Col. 3:20. These passages show that the older rendering "we may be accepted of him" in 2 Cor. 5:9 is wrong: it should be "agreeable to him."
The same word marks a difference Paul kept clear in his own life:
He was certain that he was accepted. Yet he never forgot that he had to stand before the judgment seat of Christ… So for Paul, being accepted and being acceptable were two different questions, and both mattered greatly. He knew by the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ that God had accepted him. He worked hard to be acceptable. So the teaching of grace was not weakened, even though he never lost sight of his responsibility.
This proving grows out of the walk itself. One writer shows how, with a picture from family life.
Being light in the Lord, we are to walk as children of light. That walk will show itself in "all that is good and right and true", for these things are the fruit of light. Walking this way, we shall prove in our own circumstances what is acceptable to the Lord… One writer said: "A child watches his father and learns what pleases him. He knows what his father would want in the situations that come up."
God could have given a list of answers for every case. One writer explains why He did not.
The discernment of a Christian depends on his spiritual and moral state, and God means it to be so. He will not simply be a director who hands us decisions. He makes us depend on our spiritual state even to know what His will is. This is not a set of higher rules for a select few. The discernment of the inward life makes what it sees both a delight and a duty at once.
This proving reaches the smallest choices, down to what we buy.
Is this our simple purpose? … In any common act of life, our question should be: is this acceptable to the Lord? When buying an item of clothing, it should not simply be, will this suit me? but, is it acceptable to the Lord, does it suit Him?
One writer gives the reason it reaches that far: we belong to Christ, who bought us.
To please Him who gave Himself for our sins is both the duty and the desire of the new man… We are no longer our own, but His who bought us. We please Him when we trust Him and obey His words. A Christian's business in the world is Christ, and nothing else. That word covers every lawful kind of situation and work. If we cannot do something wholeheartedly for Him, we should not do it at all.
This proving shows up in real life, and it also draws a line.
In walking as children of light we prove in experience what is acceptable to the Lord. Since He has no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, neither should we. He reproves them and so should we. We are not to argue about them or against them. We are to reject them plainly.
- Light first. The verse hangs on verse 8: because we are light in the Lord, we can tell what suits Him. The order is never reversed.
- Learned, not looked up. We learn as a child learns his father's likes, by watching. That knowledge fits situations no rule could cover.
- Proved, not just known. God holds back a list of answers on purpose. Our discernment follows our spiritual state, and what it sees becomes both a delight and a duty.
- Accepted, then acceptable. Grace settles our acceptance; being acceptable is our daily work. Holding both keeps grace intact and responsibility awake.
- Everything, or nothing. The test reaches clothes and work alike. If we cannot do it wholeheartedly for Him, we should not do it at all.
and do not have fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather also reprove [them],
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
for the things that are done by them in secret it is shameful even to say.
Paul has just told believers to have nothing to do with the fruitless works of darkness, and to expose them instead. So how do you expose evil you are not supposed to talk about?
Secret sins are as common now as they were then. Light exposes them, not our talk about them — and that exposure costs the one who shines.
Instead he should expose them — not necessarily by attacking the world's practices head on, but by a consistent godly life that reproves wrongdoing. Men's secret sins have as large a place now as in Paul's days. They are too shameful even to name. But the light exposes them and declares their true character, for light makes everything visible. Such exposing will not bring love to the witness, but rather hatred, as our Lord Jesus said: the world hates Him because He testifies that its works are evil (John 7:7). In His case the darkness hated the light; it was too much for them.
Everything turns on the word older versions translate "reprove." It does not mean scolding.
This word, reprove, occurs again, you will notice, in verse 13. Its meaning is not exactly admonish or rebuke, but rather expose. It is to expose, as by light, the true character of the works in question. If a believer shines out in his true character, his whole life will have that effect. His Master's life did this in the highest measure. Still, of course, there may be many times when words of rebuke are needed.
The Christian's answer to the world's vices is not debate. It is a choice about what fills the mind and the mouth.
We are not to argue about them or against them. We are simply and clearly to reject them. Even to talk about the vices practised in secret by the ungodly is a shame. The believer has far more profitable things to engage his thoughts and conversation.
Even rightly judging evil leaves a mark. One commentator shows why from Numbers 19.
It is a great thing for the Christian to be in the habit of living in what is good. We live in a world where we must deal with what is evil… But it will not do to be always occupied with it. It defiles even when we judge it. Think of the man who handled the ashes of the red heifer in Numbers 19. He was doing a service by gathering them up and laying them outside the camp. Yet he was unclean until evening, and the same was true of the man who applied them. It is soiling to our minds even to be judging evil.
Which sins count as the secret ones? The standard is Christ, not what other people notice.
We are to hate the unnoticed, quiet activities of the flesh as much as those that are openly filthy and corrupt. We are to loathe the secret, refined ways of selfishness as much as those that are open and shameless. To the Christian, Christ is the perfect model.
The effect goes beyond one person. Where Christians shine, public life changes — and the reverse is also true.
To speak of the things that the flesh can do in secret is shame. The light of Christ reproves the evil that it exposes. Where Christianity has shaped a land, people cannot publicly commit the gross sins that others commit openly elsewhere. The light in Christians is too strong. Sadly, as the light declines, sins again become more public and open.
- Light exposes. Exposure is what light does by being present. The believer's whole life shows the true character of dark works, though spoken rebuke is still sometimes needed.
- Light silences. The deeds done in secret are too shameful to name. So the Christian rejects them plainly instead of arguing about them or retelling them.
- Light guards. Even honest handling of evil leaves a stain. The man who gathered the ashes of the red heifer was unclean until evening. So the mind is not to live there.
- Light searches. Hate quiet, respectable selfishness as much as open filth. Christ is the standard, not public opinion.
- Light restrains. Where the light of Christ in Christians is strong, gross sin cannot go public. As that light fades, hidden sins come back into the open.
But all things having their true character exposed by the light are made manifest; for that which makes everything manifest is light.
Paul has just told believers to have nothing to do with the fruitless works of darkness. Instead they are to expose them. Here he says why that works: light brings everything into the open. Two questions follow. What does exposing ask of a Christian? And what does the closing clause about light mean?
The word does not picture a Christian telling other people off. It pictures what a lamp does to whatever it shines on.
Notice that this word, reprove, comes again in verse 13. It does not quite mean warn or rebuke. It means expose. It is to expose the true character of the works in question, the way light does. If a believer shines out in his true character, his whole life will have that effect, just as his Master's life did, in the highest measure of all. Of course there will still be many times when words of rebuke are needed.
Light does not just condemn from the outside, the way a rule does. It searches, and it shows things as they are.
It is not law, condemning by an outward standard held up against us. It is an inward and deeply searching divine capacity. Love is its source and its end, yet it spares evil even less, and it brings in good by the Holy Spirit in Christ... It belongs to light to show itself and everything else, and that is just as true in spiritual things as it is in nature.
The sentence does not stop at the verse break. It ends with a clause about light, and commentators differ over that clause. Some read it as a statement about anything that gets exposed. Others say light is what does the exposing. One writer, reviewing a new translation, argued the point sharply.
I have no doubt that this translation of Ephesians 5:13 is wrong. "Whatever is made manifest is light" is not only untrue; it is also not the point of the passage. The passage speaks of things being made manifest by the light. I admit the passage is difficult. But I believe the sense is, "what makes everything manifest is light," or, "it is the light which makes everything manifest." The form of the Greek word is found only here, and it would be a middle with an active sense.
Others say the sentence is true whichever way you take the word. And light does more than detect.
The last clause of this verse changes its meaning. It depends on whether you take the word translated "manifest" in an active or a passive sense. Either way it states an obvious truth. On the whole, the light seems meant to do more than detect. It also subdues and gives life.
If light exposes by shining, then a consistent life is itself the reproof. That is why the reaction is often hatred, not thanks.
Instead he should expose them. He need not attack the world's practices head on. A consistently godly life is itself a reproof of wickedness. People's secret sins fill as much room now as in Paul's day. They are too shameful even to name. But the light exposes them and declares their true character, for light shows up all things. Such exposing will not bring the witness love. It will bring him hatred, as our Lord Jesus said: the world "hates me because I testify about it that its works are evil" (John 7:7). In His case the darkness hated the light: it was too much for them.
Light and love are not rivals. And the light itself is not ours.
In verse 13 Paul continues along the line of holiness, righteousness and truth. But it is very important to see that the light of God never contradicts His love... Christ is always the true light. We have no light in ourselves, so even if we as Christians are called light it can only be light "in the Lord".
A verse about exposing evil is easy to aim only outward. It has a nearer target.
Bright sunlight shows up every detail of natural things. In the same way, the true light of God shows the real character of everything in the spiritual and moral realm. Are we willing to turn that light on our own conduct? And on popular religious schemes that compromise more and more of the truth of Scripture?
- Expose, not scold — "reprove" means to show a thing's true character, the way light does. Direct rebuke has its place, but it is not the main idea.
- Light acts — it is not an outward rule held up against evil. It is a searching power that shows itself and everything else, in spiritual things as in nature.
- Two readings — some say the Greek must mean "what makes everything manifest is light." Others say the truth holds either way: light both detects evil and subdues it.
- Shining costs — a godly life exposes darkness without attacking it. The darkness answers with hatred, as it did to Christ.
- Borrowed light — we are light only "in the Lord," so the first surface the beam should fall on is our own conduct.
Wherefore he says, Wake up, [thou] that sleepest, and arise up from among the dead, and the Christ shall shine upon thee.
Light shows things for what they are, and Paul now breaks into a wake-up call. Two questions follow: is he waking a dead sinner or a sleeping Christian, and where do the words come from, since no Old Testament verse matches them?
Paul introduces the line as if citing Scripture, yet no such sentence exists in the Old Testament. One writer compares two other New Testament quotations that also depart from the exact Old Testament words:
In both of these Scriptures the spirit, not the letter, is what applies to the point in hand. Used this way, it carried divine authority. So in the passage from Ephesians there can be little doubt that Isaiah 60:1 was in Paul's mind. There we read, "Arise, shine, for your light has come, and the glory of the LORD has risen upon you."
Commentators differ on the background. Some point to Isaiah 60, others add Isaiah 52. All agree the words are an adaptation, not an exact quotation.
The person addressed is already alive. He lies among the dead, but he is not one of them:
In verse 14, a sleeping man is called to "awake," not a dead man: he is a believer, but sadly, in what a state. A man asleep is no better than a dog asleep. Neither one notices anything around them.
What Christ promises him says the same thing. He does not need life. He needs light:
The Scriptures alluded to seem to be Isaiah 52 and 60. But the application here is clearly to believers, sleeping among dead men or dead things. They are called to arise, so that Christ may give them light — not life, which would be their first need as unbelievers.
Sleep does not end the believer's life. It ends his usefulness:
Sorrowful condition for a saint to slip into! What use is a sleeper as a witness to God and the truth? Thanks be to God, such are not dead. The spark of divine life is there, and nothing can put it out. But they have sunk into a state of spiritual numbness. They have lost their enjoyment of heavenly grace and their usefulness in testimony.
The promise here is not a thing but a Person:
The unbeliever is dead to God. The true believer, if he does not pay attention to these exhortations, may fall into a condition of sleep. In that sleep he is like a dead man. In such a condition he will not profit from the light of Christ. … It has been well said, "It is Christ Himself who is the source, the expression, and the measure of light for the soul that is awake."
Older translations read "Christ shall give thee light." That is the wording these writers quote. The ESV has Christ shining on the sleeper. Either way, the light comes from outside him, and only then is there something to reflect.
One writer paints it as a picture. The sleeper does not make the light; he lets it in:
Awake, rise and open the shutters of your dark chamber of deathlike sleep. Then the sun can shine in, and Christ can give you light. And if there is in your heart some secret idol-chamber — love of money, or worldliness, or something else that has slipped in between Christ and you and taken His place in your heart — open the door. Let the light of Christ and His word shine in and expose the idol in all its ugliness.
The danger is greatest where the truth is best known:
It is a solemn thing that this call goes to the company who know more than many, as at Ephesus. They had the highest truth, and were in danger of going to sleep over it.
- Sleep. The one called is a believer, not a corpse. He lies among the dead and looks just like them.
- Call. The words echo Isaiah 60:1. They carry its sense, not its exact letter.
- Rise. Christ gives him light, not life; he has life already. This is a call to recovery, not conversion.
- Shine. He gets Christ Himself — the source, the expression and the measure of all the light an awake soul enjoys.
- Reflect. A sleeping saint has no testimony. Only a soul Christ shines on can show anything of God to a hostile world. Those who know the most truth are in the most danger of dozing over it.
See therefore how ye walk carefully, not as unwise but as wise,
Ephesians 5 has already told believers what they are: light in the Lord. Now it turns to how they walk, and to what wisdom looks like in a world set against them.
In the Bible, "wise" and "unwise" are not measures of intelligence. Older translations read "not as fools, but as wise":
In Scripture, folly and wisdom are not just matters of intellect. They always have a moral character. It is the fool who says in his heart, "There is no God." The fear of the Lord is called the beginning of wisdom. The believer as a child of light has "the mind of Christ"; he has the Holy Spirit to teach him the deep things of God. He may have little worldly wisdom or knowledge, yet he has "an anointing from the Holy One," and so has the mind of God in all that concerns His things. But the flesh is always there to fight against the Spirit. So it takes careful watchfulness to walk as wise men, and not as fools.
A Christian is not asked to find wisdom somewhere outside himself. He has it already, and this verse asks him to use it:
Wisdom, as well as light, is a distinctive attribute of the new man. The Greek philosopher searched for wisdom in vain. It has come, unasked, to the awakened sinner. Christ, who is the wisdom of God in the eyes of our faith, has also been made our wisdom by God. By the counsels of that wisdom we are taught to walk... Moreover, we need wisdom to use rightly what we know. Careful watchfulness always goes with true wisdom. Those whose road to the kingdom runs through many temptations need it. In a land of danger, we must walk with measured steps... We are in the path of folly the moment we begin to walk at our own discretion.
"Look carefully" assumes there is something to look at. Being honest about your destination does not keep you out of the mud along the way:
Uprightness is not enough. If I have to cross a bog, I may be perfectly sincere in seeking a house on the other side. But if I do not look about me, I may sink in the bog. I must look about me. It takes wisdom to go through this world — I mean as a Christian.
The warning has a target. One error says that careful conduct hardly matters as long as your doctrine is sound:
The main force of this warning seems to be aimed at the deception that would make exact conduct a matter of indifference, so long as soundness of doctrine is kept up. This lowest of fallacies can still be a danger to us, if we are not kept near to God in the spirit of our minds.
Careful walking can sound defensive, like a list of things not to do:
This is not only about avoiding certain things. There is something to gain: divine wisdom to live Christ. We have to walk with all the wisdom of God. Satan is seeking to trip us up, to dim our testimony, to cause that to be seen in us which is not Christ.
The wisdom asked for here has a direction:
We are urged to walk wisely. The first fourteen verses teach that the true measure for a right walk is God's nature of light and love. We are to profit by that teaching, and "Look carefully then how you walk, not as unwise but as wise." In an evil world the Christian will need wisdom, but this wisdom is in regard to what is good. So, in another letter, the Apostle can write, "be wise as to what is good and innocent as to what is evil" (Romans 16:19).
Others put the same warning in terms of the verse's two categories. A person can belong to the second and still live like the first:
For though a believer is not a fool, yet he may be unwise and not use his time to advantage.
This carefulness is also public. Others are drawing conclusions:
Our neighbours who reject Christ still hold us responsible for Christian conduct. So we find exhortations in other parts of the Bible that tell us, in principle, that we have to take heed to what we do. Think for example of Ephesians 5:15... I am sure we all see how necessary this warning is. Our "doings" should match our words and be a bright testimony for the Lord.
- Look. The command starts with the eyes, not the feet. Sincerity about where you are going will not keep you out of the bog on the way.
- Wise. In Scripture the fool is a moral type, not a stupid one; the wise man is the one who fears God and has the mind of Christ.
- Given. We do not search this wisdom out. Christ has been made our wisdom, so failure comes not from short supply but from walking at our own discretion.
- Good. The wisdom points at what is good, not at evil: wise about good, innocent about evil.
- Seen. Careful walking is not only avoidance but gain: divine wisdom to live Christ. And neighbours are watching whether our doings match our words.
redeeming the time, because the days are evil.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
For this reason be not foolish, but understanding what [is] the will of the Lord.
This call sits in a passage about walking through an evil world. It makes wisdom concrete — knowing what the Lord wants — and raises two questions: what this "understanding" is, and how anyone gets it.
"Foolish" here is not about mental ability. In Scripture folly and wisdom describe where a person stands with God.
Folly and wisdom in Scripture are not merely intellectual qualities, but have always a moral character. It is the fool who says in his heart, "There is no God." Scripture calls the fear of the Lord the beginning of wisdom. The believer as a child of light has "the mind of Christ"; he has the Holy Spirit to teach him the deep things of God. However little gifted in worldly wisdom or knowledge, he has "an anointing from the Holy One," and so has the mind of God in all that concerns His things.
The word translated "understand" points to something more than hearing a fact.
It is to weigh something, consider it carefully, and so grasp its meaning.
A believer can know the truth and still be unwise with his time.
A believer is not a fool, yet he may be unwise and not use his time well. He should not be like that. He should understand what the will of the Lord is for him (v.17). To understand is not simply to know, but to see rightly what he knows. The will of the Lord is always spiritually profitable.
"Therefore" ties this verse to the call to redeem the time. Knowing a lot about evil is not the same as being wise.
Our wisdom will show itself in redeeming the time and understanding what the will of the Lord is. The days are evil. If the devil could have his way, there would never be a time or an opportunity for what pleases the Lord. To do good we will have to seize the moment from the enemy... Nehemiah learned the will of the Lord for His people by prayer and fasting. So when the opportunity came, standing before king Artaxerxes, he seized it (Nehemiah 1:4; Nehemiah 2:1-5). A person can know a great deal about evil and still not know the will of the Lord, and so still be "unwise".
This knowledge is not picked up at a distance.
"Do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is." I will never know what the will of the Lord is if I am not near Him in the daily life of my soul. That is a clear case. A man who is doing the will of God is not living for himself. His only thought is to do what God wishes.
Willingness comes before clarity, and the Lord Himself said so.
The Lord deals with us morally. He will not let me find out His way unless there is in me the spirit of obedience... "If anyone's will is to do God's will," says our Lord, "he will know whether the teaching is from God or whether I am speaking on my own authority," John 7:17.
The verse expects more than compliance with orders. It expects a person who has learned the heart behind them.
A servant may hear his master say, Do this, or, Don't do that, and share nothing of his master's reasons for either one. The child is under far greater obligation to complete and unquestioning obedience, yet he obeys in a different way. He knows his father's character and habits. He knows his father's purposes and plans. So he is expected to sense at once what will please his father and what will give his father joy.
This verse comes first for a reason. And wine is not the only thing that can intoxicate a person.
I think all that follows rests on this verse 17 — that we understand what the will of the Lord is for us. Once we understand that, the rest will follow. Then nothing in this world will intoxicate us. It need not be wine. Ambition can intoxicate us. So can desires that people around us count as completely acceptable — not gross evil, but things that take us away from the will of the Lord.
- Folly — being "foolish" is a moral state, not a low IQ; the fool is the one who leaves God out.
- Nearness — the will of the Lord is learned close to Him; a willing heart comes before clear knowledge.
- Understanding — to understand is to weigh what you know and see it rightly, not just store it.
- Opportunity — understanding turns evil days into chances to do good. Nehemiah seized his moment before the king.
- Sonship — the end is not a servant taking orders, but a child who senses what pleases the Father. Everything else in the chapter follows from that.
And be not drunk with wine, in which is debauchery; but be filled with the Spirit,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and chanting with your heart to the Lord;
The command comes in the verse before: do not get drunk with wine, but be filled with the Spirit. Singing is the first thing that spills over, which raises two questions: what should we sing, and where does the song start?
One writer draws a sharp line between what every believer has and what few enjoy:
It is one thing to be indwelt by the Spirit, and another to be filled with the Spirit. All believers are indwelt; but how few, sadly, are filled! ... To be filled with the Spirit is to be under the direct energy of the Spirit's action. It stands here in contrast with the forced, natural cheerfulness that wine causes. Instead of that, the believer should have the joy and happiness that the Holy Spirit pours into his heart. This will find its suitable outlet in expressions of joy; not the foolish songs of the world, but the psalms, and hymns, and spiritual songs.
Another writer pictures the change as one vessel refilled:
There is a vessel filled with the Spirit. It is the very same vessel, only changed. It was once filled with wine; now, in a spirit of thanksgiving, it is bubbling up with melody to the Lord.
The verse names three kinds of song. One writer sets out what each word covers:
The word psalm means a sacred song sung with a stringed instrument. Hymns are songs of praise to God, and the word clearly covers many of the psalms too. Still, not all psalms are hymns, and hymns are not always psalms. Spiritual songs covers more than praise. It includes songs of spiritual experience, songs celebrating events in Scripture, and songs of meditation on its various truths.
Commentators differ over whether "psalms" here means the Old Testament book. Some say it does. Others reject that, for reasons drawn from those psalms themselves:
The Old Testament Psalms cannot carry true worship. In them worship goes to Jehovah, and not to the Father and the Son. A finished redemption was not yet known. And the psalms that call down judgment are quite out of keeping with the spirit of the New Testament. So the psalms of Ephesians 5:19 cannot be the Psalms of the Old Testament. They must be psalms written for Christian worship.
Another writer notes that the New Testament gives Christians no book of songs, and sees a reason for it:
There is no supply of psalms, hymns, or spiritual songs written by inspiration for the Christian; for the Jew there is a very large one. Do you wonder at this? ... The Jew needed such praises made for him; the Church does not. The Christian and the Church have the Holy Spirit, which the Jew did not have, and so have within them a full spring for making melody in the heart.
One writer sets the order between speaking to each other and singing to the Lord, and warns what happens when the words outrun the heart:
Personal worship is the first effect of being filled with the Spirit, and the fellowship of believers naturally follows it and carries it on... Psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs are the audible expressions of a melody that begins in secret, in the heart where Christ dwells. When we are in the Spirit and speak to ourselves, we speak of Jesus; when we answer one another, it is in the Lord's song... There is no melody for Christ if our hearts are still far from Him, even though the words we use may have come from His Spirit.
The heart is not an alternative to the voice. The verse asks for both at once:
Believers here are told not to sing only, and not to make melody in the heart only, but to do both. No amount of melody with the voice can take the place of melody in the heart.
One writer adds comfort for those who cannot hold a tune:
Singing is audible, but making melody in your heart is more vital. This is surely an encouragement to those who have trouble carrying a tune!
The verse aims the song at one hearer:
We should always make sure our hymns and songs of praise are directed to God. Faith and the energy of the Spirit turn the heart straight to Him. Most religious singing today is probably aimed at people instead.
- Filled — the Spirit lives in every believer. But this song flows from being filled: from the Spirit's direct energy, not the lift wine gives.
- Overflow — the vessel that once held wine now bubbles up with melody. What fills it has changed, not who is filled.
- Three songs — psalms and hymns carry praise to God. Spiritual songs reach wider: experience, events in Scripture, and meditation on its truths.
- Source — commentators differ on whether "psalms" means the Old Testament book. Several hold that Christians need no inspired hymnbook, because the Spirit within is a spring of song.
- Direction — the verse asks for voice and heart together, both turned to the Lord. Without melody in the heart, the finest words are only sound.
giving thanks at all times for all things to him [who is] God and [the] Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ,
The apostle has just told the Ephesians not to get drunk on wine but to be filled with the Spirit. This verse names one mark of that life, and it raises a hard question: how can anyone thank God always, and for everything, when some of it hurts?
The chapter has just set wine against the Spirit. That contrast reaches down to where a believer's joy comes from.
The world's joy expresses itself in a physical way; it is mere natural excitement, such as that caused by wine. The believer's is to be the opposite of this. It is not the lift given by natural causes, but the deeper delight ministered by the Spirit of God. It is one thing to be indwelt by the Spirit, and another to be filled with the Spirit. All believers are indwelt; but how few, sadly, are filled!
The command can sound like pressure. One writer says that misses its tone.
This is not a mere duty. I need not say we cannot deny the duty part. But it is clear the Holy Spirit assumes the saints will feel and understand this: it directs the heart rather than demanding something from it... Our hearts are naturally so legal that we tend to turn the words of our God to us into a law we must bend to. That happens even with the knowledge of God we have. Instead we should see that this is the good portion God has given us. Thanksgiving always for all things is then the natural expression of the heart taught by the Holy Spirit.
Other commentators press the duty side:
Thanksgiving is not optional on our part. The apostle declares that it is "the will of God in Christ Jesus" that we should "give thanks in all circumstances."
The phrase reaches further than thanking God for what we do. It reaches what He allows to happen to us.
It is not giving thanks in everything that we do. It is more. No matter what God does, or permits to be done, I am entitled by faith to receive it as a blessing to my soul. So I give thanks for it. Whatever the trial may be — disappointment, scorn, distraction, the thousand influences that come from an evil world — I am not to thank Him for these. I thank Him for the blessing that God designs for me through them.
Only someone sure of what he has been given can talk this way.
A man must know he has a good portion who can rejoice always in all things, who can give thanks always for all things. The natural man cannot receive such a word as this... God seems to say in this passage, My child, you will never be in any circumstances, or in any position, in which you have no cause to give thanks... This giving of thanks is not one or two links of a chain, then broken off; no, it is continuous and unbroken and lasting.
The Lord Himself did this at the worst moment of His rejection.
He could and did give thanks in the hour of deepest trial. In Matthew 11 and Luke 10 we see Him rejected by men... The dark shadows of the cross were already falling across His path. Then we read: "At that time" — mark it well. At that time, when all was darkest and He had unspeakable anguish ahead, "Jesus rejoiced" and said, "I thank you, Father." Oh, for grace to imitate Him in this — not only in subjection to the will of God, but in receiving the heaviest trials from the Father's hand, knowing that all is for eventual blessing.
Job is the opposite case. One writer traces his failure to one thing:
He was occupied with circumstances, and not with the God of circumstances.
Thanks here rests on something already done. What arrives does not set its level.
Redemption has set the believer in a position of eternal obligation to the God of grace... Everything, then, is to be acknowledged thankfully. The thing received, whether good or bad, matters less than the hand that gives it... Notice the deliberate precision in the language of this verse. Its many-sided purpose is to keep us from falling below the true level of spiritual worship when we give thanks.
Thanksgiving does not stay private. It changes how believers treat each other.
This constantly thankful spirit will have both a preserving and a fruitful effect. It will make submission to one another in the fear of God simpler for us. So we will recognise God as being in control, rather than the will of man dominating.
- Source — Thanksgiving here is not willpower. It is what a heart filled with the Spirit does naturally, in place of the world's borrowed excitement.
- Freedom — The words direct the heart; they do not squeeze thanks out of it. Yet other writers stress it is also God's declared will.
- Reach — "For everything" includes the trial. You thank God not for the pain, but for the blessing He is designing through it.
- Ground — Thanks go to the Father, through the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. The precision keeps our praise at the level of worship, valuing the Giver above the gift.
- Result — A thankful heart lives above circumstances, not inside them. It yields to others, because it treats God as the One in control.
submitting yourselves to one another in [the] fear of Christ.
Ephesians 5:21 sits at a hinge: it closes the call to be filled with the Spirit and opens the section on husbands, wives, children and servants. Two questions press on it: what does mutual submission mean, and whose fear is meant?
This verse falls in the practical half of the letter.
The first three chapters show the believer's standing in Christ, and God's thoughts about the Church. The practical teaching that follows falls into four groups. They match the believer's relationship with the Church (Eph. 4:1‑16), the world (Eph. 4:17‑5:21), the family (Eph. 5:21 — Eph. 6:9), and the powers of darkness (Eph. 6:10‑17). In each of these positions, the rule of conduct given to him matches his standing, shown earlier in the letter.
Verse 18 contrasts wine with the Spirit. The verses after it show what each one produces.
Another word is added here that seems a little out of place: "Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God." The cheerfulness stirred up by wine is quarrelsome and self-assertive. The gladness of heart poured out by the Spirit is not. The deep sense of grace that calls forth praise and thanksgiving to God humbles instead of exalting. The fuller the heart is of praise to God, the lower it will be in its own esteem. So comes submission to one another. It does not come merely out of kindness and good nature, but out of the deep sense of the fear of God. That fear never stops filling the heart occupied with His goodness and love.
The word is not another name for obedience. One writer separates the two.
Submitting myself to another means accepting and taking a lower place under another person's lawful authority over me. Obedience means behaving and acting according to that place. I do that by submitting my will to the will of the one who has authority over me. It holds whether I am there by my own choice or by necessity, such as birth. Naturally speaking, the two are not always the same. There may be an outward submission without real obedience. In the Christian sense, both are a matter of the heart, as being done to the Lord.
Yielding to one another has a limit. It stops where God's will is at stake.
Then you get a spirit of grace, "submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of Christ." It does not mean submitting to do evil if you ask me to. It means that faith has no will of its own. If you want me to do wrong, I cannot do it, because it is not God's will; but in everything where my own will is concerned, I give way to you. We are to submit to one another in the fear of Christ. It is what sitting in heavenly places produces on earth.
Older English versions read "fear of God". The ESV has "out of reverence for Christ". One writer holds that the difference matters.
Now look at the second part of our verse. It tells us that such submission of one to another is to be "in the fear of Christ." That is the correct reading, not "in the fear of God," as the common version has it. The fear of God is all-important. It marks the beginning of God's work in a soul, as with the thief on the cross. It also marks the Christian's walk in holiness of life (2 Cor. 7:1). Yet in this passage, as in Colossians 3, the Spirit of God delights to set Christ Himself fully before the eye of faith as Head of the Church — the second Person of the Godhead, the Father's well-beloved.
This word is for all believers together. It shows up in everyday deference.
Christian humility of mind willingly takes the lowest seat at God's great feast of mercy. It knows how unworthy it is of what it is so freely called to share. So it gladly lets God's other guests go first. If the heart is in its right state, it will always see the Lord in His people. Then showing them deference in love becomes an easy and welcome duty. This habitual turning to God is what keeps Christian fellowship from sinking into ordinary human company.
- Filled — Submission is one of the plain marks of a life filled with the Spirit, alongside praise and thanksgiving.
- Lowered — Praise humbles. The fuller the heart is of thanks to God, the lower it holds itself, and submission follows naturally.
- Yielded — To submit is to take a lower place under lawful authority. Obedience is then living out that place. Outward submission can happen without real obedience.
- Limited — Where my own will is the only thing at stake, I give way. Where God's will is at stake, I cannot.
- Reverent — The motive is reverence for Christ as Head, not the fear of God as older versions read. That reverence keeps fellowship from sinking into ordinary human company.
Wives, [submit yourselves] to your own husbands, as to the Lord,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
for a husband is head of the wife, as also the Christ [is] head of the assembly. *He* [is] Saviour of the body.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
But even as the assembly is subjected to the Christ, so also wives to their own husbands in everything.
This verse turns a household instruction into a picture of something far larger. The wife's place beside her husband follows the church's place beside Christ. So what kind of subjection is this, and how far does "in everything" reach?
The command does not stand alone. It rests on what has just been said about headship, so the wife's submission follows from the position she has been given rather than from a decision she makes.
This Scripture shows that the position of the wife is one of subjection. The wife is indeed told to obey, but the ground of it is the place she holds. A word or two added in the translation has somewhat hidden this. We read, "As the church is subject to Christ, so let the wives be." But leave out the word "let." The italics show it was added. Then we have a simple statement of fact: "As the church is subject to Christ, so also the wives to their own husbands in everything." This matters. The obedience asked of the wife then flows out of the position she is set in — the natural fruit of the relationship. In other words, obedience to her husband is not left to the wife's choice; it is to be given because of her relative place.
The comparison holds even though the visible history of Christians makes a poor advertisement for it. The apostle points to the place the church holds, not to how she has behaved.
The apostle speaks of the place where the church has been set, that of subjection to her Head. He is not speaking of her actual practice. Sadly, how much self-will and losing sight of the Headship of Christ has spoiled that practice! But the truth stands: "the church is subject to Christ." He is her glorified Head. The Christian wife is to learn the great principle and act on it.
Notice how the sentence is built. It does not just say "in everything." It says "as the church submits to Christ." That comparison brings Christ's own dealing with His people into the standard.
Such is the general principle. But then, you will notice, there is always a measure and a guard in every such word of Scripture. It is not simply said, "Therefore, let the wives be subject in everything to their own husbands," but "Therefore, as the Church is subject to Christ, so let the wives be." So Christ's own blessed way of caring for the church, and of dealing with it in its due subjection to the Lord, becomes the pattern for wives towards their own husbands.
The phrase is broad. But it has one boundary, and the wording in Colossians shows where it lies.
There seems to be one limit to this statement. The words in Colossians show it: "Wives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord" (Col. 3:18). Suppose the husband's will interferes with the wife's own responsibility to the Lord. Suppose it clashes with the Lord's will as given in His word. If she must choose between obeying her husband and disobeying the Lord, then the Lord must have the supreme claim. With this one exception her submission to her husband must be complete.
Notice who receives which instruction. The command about subjection goes to one side only, and not to the side with authority.
Wives are told to submit to their husbands. Husbands are never pressed to keep their wives in subjection. The duty pressed on them is to love their wives.
Marriage carries marks of the fall. Yet the verse lifts it up, because of what it now pictures.
The subjection of the believer to the Lord, or of the Church to Christ, is no curse or bondage. These are now the models for the wife's subjection. She is to be subject to her own husband, "as to the Lord," and as "the Church is subject to Christ." How beautiful to see a human relationship turned into a picture of the mystery — and a relationship that draws part of its character from the fall! In that mystery God displays His "manifold wisdom" to "the rulers and authorities in the heavenly places."
- Pattern. The church's relation to Christ her Head sets the model for the wife's place.
- Position. Her subjection grows out of the place she holds, not out of a choice she makes. Take away the added word "let" and the verse reads as a plain statement of fact.
- Measure. The same comparison that commands her also guards her. It brings in Christ's own way of caring for the church as the pattern.
- Limit. "In everything" has one boundary. If obeying her husband would mean disobeying the Lord, the Lord comes first.
- Dignity. The pattern brings no bondage, but honour. A human marriage becomes a picture of the mystery in which God shows His wisdom to rulers in heaven.
Husbands, love your own wives, even as the Christ also loved the assembly, and has delivered himself up for it,
Ephesians points husbands to the cross: not a rule for running the home, but a pattern to copy — Christ's love for the church. That raises the real questions here: what sort of love this is, how far it goes, and what it asks of a man.
The verse speaks to each side of a marriage where it is most likely to fail. For the husband, that place is not authority.
Husbands are not told to rule. That is not where they are likely to fail. They are told to love. Wives are not addressed this way. With them, love is not as likely to be weak as submission is. So what is put before the husband? "Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave Himself up for her." Once we take this in, it lifts us above the merely natural level. God's own love is our heavenly pattern.
The verse does not simply approve of the affection a man already feels. It brings in a love of another order, drawn from three periods of Christ's dealings with the church.
Natural affection is recognised here, but a far higher kind of love is brought in. It re-shapes an earthly relationship after a heavenly pattern. The past, present, and future love of Christ for the church are all brought to bear on the husband's duty to his wife.
The verse does not say He gave gifts, or that He gave much. It says He gave Himself, and writers keep coming back to that word.
The first thing of all is His own love, which nothing outside Himself caused. "He loved the church" — perfectly, as God loves, without limit. Here we see how complete His love is. "He gave Himself." He did not only do something for it: "He gave Himself!" ... The self-sacrifice of Christ was absolute: it was Himself, all He is, and all He was in His perfection. Everything in His nature was behind it: "He gave Himself."
Another writer sets the outer limit of that gift.
He then gave Himself; and He could give no more.
The order in the verse matters. The love and the self-giving come first; the cleansing follows in the verses after.
Let us remember that He did not first make the church worthy to be loved, then love it and give Himself for it. He loved it as it was, then gave Himself for it, and now works to make it suitable to Himself. ... Christ loved the church in all its deep need, and gave Himself for it; then, having made it His own, He cleanses it and makes it fit for Himself. None of us is content when someone we love is not what we would wish. Christ will not be content until the church suits Him completely.
Take this standard seriously and it touches even the decision to marry. It also puts a price on love.
Husbands are to love their own wives by no lower standard than Christ's love for the church (v.25). He gave Himself for it. He did not just give many gifts; He gave Himself. If one is not willing to give himself for an intended wife, he ought not to marry her. Notice what this whole section stresses: love works for the greatest good of the one it loves, and it pays for that itself.
Love is the husband's task, so love is also his only tool.
Think of a Christian husband who has spent a hard, stormy day resting his heart on Christ's love and warming himself in it. He does not come home and frown his wife into silence, submission, and obedience. He loves her into it. The only force he uses is his own example — his submission to Christ the Head, his dependence on Him, and his obedience to His Word.
The love that starts at the cross does not stop there. The One who gave Himself is also the One who will receive the church at the end.
Christ Jesus Himself is woven through every part of it. He Himself is the beginning, He Himself the end, He Himself all the way through. He gave Himself as the beginning; and He presents it to Himself as the end. Meanwhile He tenderly cares for the church.
- Love, not rule. The husband's command is love, because that is where he is likely to fail. The wife's harder task is submission.
- Loved first. Christ did not wait for the church to be worthy — He loved it as it was, and the cleansing came afterwards.
- Gave Himself. Not gifts, and not a part of Himself: the whole of Himself, and He could give no more. That is the measure set beside a marriage.
- Cost, not sentiment. Love here works for the other person's greatest good, at real cost. A man who will not give himself should not marry.
- Beginning to end. He gave Himself at the start. He cares for the church now. He will present it to Himself at last. One unbroken love, for a husband to copy.
in order that he might sanctify it, purifying [it] by the washing of water by [the] word,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
that *he* might present the assembly to himself glorious, having no spot, or wrinkle, or any of such things; but that it might be holy and blameless.
Paul is teaching husbands how to love their wives. To do it, he points them to the end of Christ's love for the church: a presentation day still ahead. The verse raises three questions. Who receives the church? What do "spot" and "wrinkle" mean? And what is Christ doing about them now?
Who receives the church on that day? The answer shapes everything else in the verse.
But what is the object of Christ's love in the future? "That He might present it to Himself" — not to another. Not, here, to display it to the world, but "TO HIMSELF," "a glorious church." Yes, not a church in shame, but glorious, "not having spot or wrinkle, or any such thing," but "holy and blameless" (Eph. 1:4; 5:27).
God formed the woman and brought her to Adam. That first scene shows why the church cannot come to Christ as she is now.
In paradise, when God built the woman, He presented her to Adam: this is what will happen concerning the church; Eph. 5:27. He has given His life for her. He washes her by His word. He will present her to Himself glorious, with the same glory He Himself has as risen and glorified. This will be the marriage supper of the Lamb. The church is the bride united to Jesus in glory. She is justified, purified, and glorified. A bride in a lowly body is not fit for a Bridegroom in a glorious body.
Christ's love moves in stages: He gave Himself, He cleanses now, He will present at the end. Only the last stage is final.
This is the complete account of what Christ does: He cleanses the Church as well as sanctifies it. All defilement has to go, and in both cases God uses the washing of water by the word. But there is a third and future fruit of His love — "that He might present it to Himself a glorious Church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing." There we have the complete blessing of the Church. Cleansing will no longer be in question. All the love of Christ will have its perfect effect, and the Church will be glorious according to His own likeness.
The two words are not repetition. They name two different ways beauty is lost.
There are two things by which beauty is marred: spots and wrinkles. The first show defilement. The second come from passion, or from worry and age. Both are the effects of sin — the first directly, the second indirectly. If there were no sin in the world, there would be no spots and no wrinkles. Everyone dislikes wrinkles, clean or not. But only a clean person avoids spots. Someone with dirty habits does not mind them.
Count the two positive words too, and the verse gives four marks. They land at the rapture, when Christ comes and takes His people to Himself.
So at the rapture we shall all be without spot for ever. Second, we shall be without wrinkle, without any marks of decay. Third, we shall be fully holy in nature. Fourth, without blemish… These four marks mean we shall be stainless, ageless, sinless and blameless in the day that is coming when He presents us collectively to Himself. Nothing less than His own standard will do…
The sweep of the wording rules out a partial gathering.
It will have no spot, that is, no defect of any sort. No wrinkle, that is, no sign of age or decay, "nor any such thing," that is, no other defect of any imaginable kind. Could language be stronger or more sweeping? How could that fit the idea that the Lord will catch up only some of the many who make up the church when He comes? In that case He would indeed present to Himself mutilated fragments rather than a church without spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing.
What about the church as it looks now? An ordinary gathering can look like anything but glorious.
Yet they do give us a very different idea of the reality of things from what we often think when we come together, twenty or more of us, let us say, to break bread. All of us are very weak, all failing, all apt to make mistakes. Not one of us is anything to be proud of. We think, "What a poor lot we are!" And it is true. But when we read verses like these, we see that a work of the Lord is in progress upon us.
- Given — Love began with a gift of Himself. Everything in this verse grows out of that one act.
- Cleansed — He washes His people by the word now. One day that cleansing is finished and never needed again.
- Presented — He hands the church to no one else. God brought the woman to Adam; Christ brings the bride to Himself, glorious with His own glory.
- Flawless — Spot means defilement, wrinkle means decay. Add holy and without blemish, and the four marks read: stainless, ageless, sinless, blameless.
- Whole — No fragment, no select few. The sweeping language leaves no one out. So the weakest gathering today can still say: a work of the Lord is in progress upon us.
So ought men also to love their own wives as their own bodies he that loves his own wife loves himself.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
For no one has ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, even as also the Christ the assembly
The verse rests on something no one has to be taught: we feed and protect our own bodies. Paul makes that instinct the standard for how a husband loves his wife, and then says it is the way Christ treats the church.
The verse does not appeal to duty first. It appeals to something already at work in every person, and God puts His approval on it.
The Spirit of God here assumes a necessary way of nature, and assumes it with approval. That regard for one's self which each of us is ready enough to give has God's own approval. And then, on this very principle of nature, the apostle goes on to set out the Lord's nourishing care of the Church... So if I can understand my love for myself, I may understand Christ's love to me. My Lord owns the duty I owe myself as a duty He owes to me. He can only nourish and cherish me, as I would nourish and cherish myself.
Applied to marriage, this reshapes how a man sees his wife — and how he sees any injury done to her.
He is now taking up the common instinct that men naturally avoid pain and take care of themselves. He is speaking only of the fact. He says: look upon your wife as a part of yourself. Anything that would wrong her is that much wrong done to your own body.
The two words are not repetition. Each means something different, and each reaches us in its own way.
And what are nourishing and cherishing? Nourishing is food, and cherishing is warmth of affection. You have the truth ministered by the gifts the Lord gives — that is the nourishment, and saints need nourishment... not just the ministry of all that He is to our souls to form us like Himself; He also leaves out no detail of tender care for His own.
Christ's aim is heaven. But this verse is about now — what His love is doing for the church here, and what draws it out.
Not only has Christ a heavenly aim, but His love performs the work which, so to speak, is natural to it. He cares tenderly for the church here below; He nourishes it, He cherishes it. The church's needs, weaknesses, difficulties and anxieties are only openings for Christ to show His love... If the end is heaven, He does not leave the church abandoned here. She learns His love where her heart needs it.
That has a steadying effect on anyone discouraged by the state of Christians around them.
It is a great comfort to know this is true of the Church as it is now, when we think of the ruin all around. Does Christ ever cease to nourish what belongs to Him? Impossible. In spite of all the ruin, He has the same care for His people.
Some older translations end the verse with "even as the Lord the church." One commentator shows why the better reading, "Christ," matters.
Scripture never speaks of Him as Lord in relation to the Church. That clause in Ephesians 5:29, when read rightly, stands: "even as the Christ the Church." To the Church, whether seen as His body or His bride, He is head, not Lord. Lord of course He is; God made Him such... Headship and Lordship both belong to Him, but they are not interchangeable terms. As Lord, He stands apart from all others; as head, He is in close association with what He is joined to.
Care that flows from union rather than rank changes the character of the love itself:
Christ's care of the church does not flow from prerogative only, but His care and tenderness are exercised over it... The love we have to learn is not supremacy in love, but caring, as it were, for Himself.
A husband is not asked to copy everything Christ does. The call is narrower, and more searching.
Christ's love in cleansing the Church is set here before the Christian husband. That is not so that he should set to work and do the same with his wife. It is so that he may, in a general way, learn from our loving Head in glory to show his love to his wife in tender concern for everything that touches her welfare... There are not a few who show great willingness (I do not say skill) for washing their wives' feet, but let them starve at the same time. If you do not know how to nourish and cherish your wife, as your own body, you are not fit to wash her feet.
Measured against Christ, the standard is one a husband never finishes meeting.
What heights and depths this comparison holds! It shows that the debt of love is never paid, but always owed. And yet that love delights to own the debt, and to keep paying it, lavishing care and tenderness on her who has become one with him in God's view.
- Instinct — No one needs convincing to care for himself. God approves that love and makes it the measure for all that follows.
- Measure — Take that instinct as your gauge of Christ's love for you: what you owe yourself, He owns as owed by Him to you.
- Method — Nourishing is food; cherishing is warmth of affection. Christ gives both: truth ministered to us, and tender care that never fails.
- Moment — This is His love now, not only at the cross or at the end. The church's weaknesses and worries are openings for it.
- Mirror — A husband is not asked to cleanse his wife but to feed and warm her; the debt is never paid off, and love is glad it isn't.
for we are members of his body; [we are of his flesh, and of his bones.]
The words come as a reason, not a new subject: Christ nourishes and cherishes the church because of what she is to Him. Everything turns on that little "because." What comes next points back to Adam.
(Older translations add "of His flesh, and of His bones" at the end of the verse. The commentators below work from that longer reading.)
The verse gives a reason for that care. The church's needs only give His love something to do.
No one, he says, ever hated his own flesh; he nourishes and cherishes it, just as the Lord does the church. This is the precious side of Christ's love for the present time, which the apostle presents here. His love does the work which, so to speak, is natural to it. He cares tenderly for the church here below. Her wants, weaknesses, difficulties and anxieties are only opportunities for Christ to exercise His love.
Christ's love has two sides. One prepares the church for glory; the other cares for her on the way.
Sanctifying and cleansing look on to the presentation in glory. Nourishing and cherishing belong to our journey on earth. His love not only looks on to the glory. It also watches over us on the way there, as we pass through this dark world from which He is absent. He knows the circumstances we are in and the trials we have to meet. He knows our weaknesses and infirmities. In them all He cares for us and meets our needs.
The verse uses a measure everyone already knows: how you treat your own body.
God Himself approves the regard for oneself that each of us is ready enough to give. The apostle says Christ acts towards us on this instinctive verdict of nature: a man is to love his own body. So if I can understand my love for myself, I may understand Christ's love to me. My Lord acknowledges the duty I owe myself as owed by Him to me.
Christ counts what touches the church as touching Himself.
We are, as it were, a part of Himself. We have our existence and our being from Him, as Eve had hers from Adam. He can say, "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting."
Does that make us Christ's flesh and bone in a physical sense?
We must not take this literally here. But could language set out the mystical union of Christ and His Church more clearly or more forcibly? These words come from Adam's cry of wonder when he woke from his deep sleep. That sleep pictures the death of Christ for His redeemed, so that He might have a Bride for His affections. When Adam looked at his bride he said, "This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh." That was literally true of Adam and Eve. It is used as a symbol of Christ and His Church.
Some read the verse as though it described Christ taking human nature. Kelly reads it the other way round.
The verse is sometimes applied to Christ's becoming man; but it is the reverse of that. It does not mean Christ taking our flesh and bone, but our being made members of His body, of His flesh, and of His bones. It is our relationship to Christ risen from the dead, not Christ's relationship to us as a man on earth. We are really a part of Himself, united to Him as He now is in the presence of God.
If the union is with a risen and ascended Man, it has a date and a means.
So it is clearly the raised and ascended man who is made head of the body, and set over all things. There was no such man until the ascension. So where people set up the church before Pentecost in their imagination, union loses all its reality and the church loses all true existence. "He who is joined to the Lord becomes one spirit with Him." We are members of His body, of His flesh, and of His bones. All of this assumes the man Christ, and Christ ascended, when union is spoken of — and that is union by the power of the Holy Spirit.
- Because — the verse is a reason, not a description. Christ feeds and cherishes the church because she is part of Himself.
- Now — cleansing looks ahead to the glory. Nourishing and cherishing are for the journey through this world in the meantime.
- Measure — the care you give your own body is the measure Christ owns as owed by Him to you.
- Eve — the words are Adam's on waking; the deep sleep pictures Christ's death, out of which the church came to be His.
- Risen — the union is not with Christ born into flesh but with Christ raised and ascended. The Holy Spirit makes it real in us.
Because of this a man shall leave his father and mother, and shall be united to his wife, and the two shall be one flesh.
Paul's teaching to husbands reaches back to the oldest words in the Bible about marriage. He quotes them, then says he is speaking about Christ and the church — so how can one ordinary human bond carry so much weight?
Paul draws on the making of Eve in Genesis. One writer reads that scene as a picture drawn long before the thing it pictures.
Adam falls into a deep sleep. God takes a rib out of his side and builds a woman from it. Then God Himself marries our first parents. Is not this a beautiful picture of Christ and the church? He falls into the deep sleep of death, and through His death He forms His Bride. Thousands of years later the believers at Ephesus read in Paul's letter how a husband should behave towards his wife. Yet that was not the main thought. Paul used their earthly relationship as a picture of Christ and His church... But if we throw doubt on Genesis, we throw doubt on Ephesians too.
The verse starts with leaving. One writer takes that as the founding of a new household, not the cancelling of an old duty.
Marriage begins a new estate. Father and mother are to be loved and honoured still, but relied on no longer as protectors. The man departs from his state of dependence as a son to become himself the head of a new house.
That shift changes where a man's daily attention goes.
Before a man marries, his chief relationship is that of a son. His responsibility is towards his parents. But when he marries he leaves his father and mother and holds fast to his wife. From then on she becomes his chief care, for he and she are no longer two but one flesh.
The verse asks a husband to "hold fast" to his wife. Older translations render that word "cleave" or "cling", and the wife owes her husband the same devotion.
God established marriage as the first of human relationships. He makes it clear for all later generations that a man should leave his father and mother and cling to his wife. It is just as clear that the woman should leave her parents to become fully devoted to her husband. The word "cling" is beautiful here. It involves the reality of love, of devotedness and of faithfulness.
The verse also settles how open a husband should be with his wife.
I hardly need to say that this verse rules out everything opposed to complete confidence in such a relationship. The husband, if he acts in the spirit of it, has no secret from the one who is part of himself.
Paul explains the verse himself. The "leaving" becomes something Christ did.
The man who loves his wife loves himself, and he is to leave other relationships to be joined to his wife. The Apostle quotes from Genesis. But he states clearly that this is a great mystery about Christ and the church. Christ, as Man, left all relations with Israel according to the flesh to secure His church.
Some take "one flesh" to mean Christ becoming a man. William Kelly rules that out.
This is sometimes applied to Christ's becoming man, but it is the opposite of that. It does not mean Christ taking our flesh and bone; it means our being made members of His body, of His flesh, and of His bones. It is our relationship to Christ risen from the dead, not Christ's relationship to us as a man on earth... It is our union with Him, not His incarnation.
- Quoted — Paul lifts the sentence from the account of Adam and Eve. The garden pictured the union of Christ and the church long before Paul explained it.
- Leave — marriage starts a new household. Parents are still honoured, but no longer leaned on. The wife becomes the husband's first care.
- Cling — the word means love, devotedness and faithfulness. Husband and wife each owe it to the other.
- One flesh — if she is part of himself, then secrecy and reserve have no place in the marriage.
- Mystery — Christ Himself left His relations with Israel to gain the church. The union in view is with the risen Christ, not His becoming man.
This mystery is great, but *I* speak as to Christ, and as to the assembly.
Paul has just been writing about husband and wife. Now he tells us his real subject was Christ and the church all along, and the word "mystery" is the hinge of the whole passage.
In the Bible this word is not something too deep to grasp. It is something God kept back and has now made known.
The mystery is no longer "hidden in God"; it is disclosed. You must always keep this in mind when you read about the mystery — it is now revealed and nothing is left in the dark. God sets the secret out in His own light, and He expects the simplest Christian to receive it. Could any words do more to destroy the common idea that a mystery means something we cannot understand, and that a godly person dare not look into?
This letter speaks of more than one mystery. This one has its own content.
Here we have a special part only: the union of the Church with Christ, as of His body, His bones and His flesh. This union sets the Church in its own special and wonderful place, when all was headed up in Christ in heaven and earth. It is a special mystery to itself.
Paul calls only one other mystery great. That comparison shows the weight of this one.
The emphasis of the Apostle's language is very remarkable. All the mysteries of God are the subject of His stewardship. Even so, the only other place where he speaks of a great mystery is where he describes the coming of the Living One in flesh, and its effects, under the title of the "mystery of godliness." Only one wonder is greater: the Son of God taking our flesh. Next to it stands this mystery, which declares the Church to be the acceptable spouse of Christ.
It is easy to read this backwards, as though Paul reached for a handy comparison. The order runs the other way.
The relationship of husband and wife is not simply a convenient illustration. Ephesians 5 makes it clear that God modelled marriage on what He had in His mind: the relationship of Christ and the church. That relationship of Christ and His church was in the Divine mind in eternity, and in time God set up the relationship of husband and wife.
Look at how God made the first man and woman. Every detail carries weight.
The particular way God made Eve out of Adam gives marriage a special holiness. The husband is to cherish his wife as part of his own being. It also supplies a beautiful picture of Christ's relationship with the Church. As Adam was not complete without Eve, so Christ, though Head over all, is not complete without the Church... As Adam fell into a deep sleep, so Christ went into death. As Eve was formed out of Adam, so the Church is given life with Christ, and has His own life.
A well-known teaching about marriage rests on the Latin translation of this verse. One writer tests it for consistency.
The word "sacrament" comes from the Latin sacramentum, the oath of loyalty taken by Roman soldiers. So it is a church term, not a Scriptural one. The Latin translation uses it for the Greek word mysterion, mystery. It does so in Eph. 5:32, where the Apostle speaks of marriage. From this, the Roman Catholic church makes marriage a sacrament. The absurdity of this is clear. If the Greek word mysterion always meant a sacrament, the usual church sense of the word would be gone. Think of "the mystery of the gospel," "the mystery of godliness," "the mystery of iniquity." And if it does not always mean that, then on what authority in Eph. 5:32?
This heavenly truth does not stay in the air. It comes home to daily married life.
The full union is still only a hope. Yet the Christian husband or wife believes that such a relationship exists, and that belief is to govern their feelings about the merely natural tie. Loving from principle, in the power of faith, is something different from obeying a natural instinct... Here we are taught that among Christians, Christ is to be the one rule that governs every relationship a member of His body may be called to fill.
- Mystery — told. Not a puzzle to avoid. It is a secret God once hid and has now made plain to the simplest believer.
- Mystery — named. Its content is the union of the church with Christ, a secret standing in a class of its own.
- Mystery — great. Paul calls only one other mystery great: the mystery of godliness. The church as Christ's spouse ranks next to God manifest in flesh.
- Mystery — pictured. Adam's deep sleep and Eve made from him came first in history but second in purpose. God modelled marriage on Christ and the church, not the other way round.
- Mystery — lived. The great thing is Christ and the church. So marriage is not a sacrament but a reflection: love and reverence at home, governed by Him.
But *ye* also, every one of you, let each so love his own wife as himself; but as to the wife [I speak] that she may fear the husband.
Ephesians has just lifted marriage to its highest point: Christ and the church. Now, in one verse, the subject comes back down to one man and one woman in one home. Everything turns on a small word — "however" (older versions read "nevertheless"). Two duties follow, and they are not the same: he loves, she respects.
Why does the verse start with a turn like this? Having taught the heavenly side of marriage, the Spirit adds a word that steadies and limits it.
The apostle's "nevertheless" is very important. It has wide application. Clearly the Holy Spirit saw the need for such a qualifying, moderating, regulating clause when, having commented on the heavenly side of the subject of marriage, He adds the words of this verse.
Why does this need saying? Because marriage stands in two worlds at once.
Are not husbands and wives, parents and children, masters and servants, earthly relationships? Unquestionably. True, they are formed on a heavenly model and to be carried out after a heavenly pattern... Still they are relationships in nature, formed on the earth and to be carried out in daily life. There will be no such relationships in heaven.
The command does not speak to marriage in general. It names each husband. Daily life at home tests what he says he believes.
Of what use is it for a man to speak of lofty theories about the heavenly relationship of Christ and the church while he fails every day of his life in his earthly relationship as a husband? His wife is neglected. She may be treated coldly or harshly. She is not nourished, cherished, sustained and ministered to according to the heavenly model of Christ and His church.
The husband gets no list of rules. He gets one standard, and it is a high one.
The marriage relationship is set forth in the highest possible light... We are to walk in this light, and so the Christian husband is to love his wife as he loves himself — no small standard, that! — and the wife to reverence her husband.
Husband and wife are one flesh. So Christ's care for the church sets the pattern for his care of her.
The wife, being "one flesh" with him, he must nourish and cherish her, even as Christ the church. What heights and depths this comparison contains! It shows indeed that the debt of love is never paid, but always owed. And yet love delights to recognise it, and to be always paying it, lavishing care and tenderness on her who has become one with him in the view of God.
The word behind "respects" is a word for fear. What kind of fear does it mean, and how does a wife show it?
The word "fear" is the same as the one translated "reverence" in Ephesians. It teaches that her behaviour should recognise the position the husband holds in God's order and appointment. There is no thought of slavish dread, but simply the loving reverence which seeks to please and fears to offend. This grows naturally out of giving her husband his true place — his place as her head. So when she gives him respect, she also honours God's appointment.
This fear does not compete with love. It has an aim, and it binds both sides of the marriage.
Let her see that she reverences or, literally, fears her husband... Whatever the confidence of a wife in her husband, it is surely a fitting thing for a wife to fear him. Nor is this in the least incompatible with love... Here it is the fear that dreads to offend, and earnestly seeks the husband's honour... The principle always holds. As nothing justifies a husband in not loving his wife, so nothing justifies a wife in not reverencing her husband.
The verse's two commands are not rivals. The same pattern appears in the church's own attitude toward Christ.
She reverences her husband (it might read, "Fear the husband," Eph. 5:33), while she knows that he loves her as Himself.
And when either side is dropped, homes suffer for it.
We are not to forget that the husband is to love his wife as himself, and the wife is to reverently fear her husband. Here lies the true secret of married happiness, and it is because these scriptural exhortations are not heeded that so much sorrow and distress are found in many homes.
- Nevertheless — one word carries the highest truth in Scripture into an ordinary house. Heavenly teaching is meant to shape earthly ties that will not exist in heaven.
- In particular — the command names each husband. The way he treats one wife day by day tests all his big talk about Christ and the church.
- As himself — the husband measures love by the care he gives his own body. The pattern is Christ nourishing and cherishing the church: a debt of love never paid off, always owed.
- Respect — the word means fear. Not dread, but loving respect that seeks to please, fears to offend, and guards her husband's honour.
- Together — love and respect are two halves of one order. Keep both, and you hold the true secret of married happiness.
Children, obey your parents in [the] Lord, for this is just.
The letter has just spoken to husbands and wives. Now it turns to the children of the house. Two questions follow. Why is a child's obedience called "right," and what does "in the Lord" add?
Obedience to parents is not a Christian invention. It stood in nature and in the law. But the apostle does not just repeat it — he moves it to new ground.
The subjection of children to their parents is part of God's order as seen in nature. Under the law, God attached a special blessing to keeping the commandment that required this duty. Christianity takes up the obligation, but transplants it from natural ground to divine ground... So the obligation of children, like that of wives, is tied to "the Lord." It is not just what nature dictates, though that is perfectly right. It is the acknowledgment of the Lord's claims as represented in the parents. The Lord Himself, who "learned obedience," was the beautiful example of this. It is recorded that in His life on earth He went with His parents to Nazareth and "was submissive to them."
The phrase "in the Lord" is not reserved for children. It runs through every instruction here, tying each member of the family to one authority.
Each of us acknowledges Christ as Lord, and we are to carry out the responsibilities of every relationship in the fear of the Lord. The wife is to be subject to her own husband "as to the Lord" (v. 22). Children are to obey their parents "in the Lord" (Ephesians 6:1). Fathers are to train their children in the "admonition of the Lord" (Ephesians 6:4). Servants are to do "service as to the Lord" (Ephesians 6:7). And masters are to remember that they have a Master in heaven.
Family feeling is good. But the verse does not rest a child's obedience on it. Kelly explains why something stronger is needed.
A Christian household runs easily where the young obey — above all, where they "obey in the Lord." Natural affection is sweet, and the lack of it is a sign of the dangerous last days. But it is not enough. Conscience is not enough either. It matters greatly in its place, but it is not an adequate guard, and it cannot be a spring of power. The Lord is. And how blessed it is when duty is clothed with Him and absorbed in Him!
The reason Paul gives is fitness. Command belongs to one place, obedience to the other.
Obedience is urged on two grounds. First, "For this is right" (Eph. 6:1). That is, God declares that obedience is a righteous thing for children to give their parents. It suits the place of a parent to command, and the place of a child to obey.
The same writer traces where the opposite road leads:
Even a little acquaintance with life shows that the first step in a downward career has often begun with disobedience to parents. Write the histories of all the poor prodigal sons and daughters who are now trying to satisfy their hunger with the "pods that the pigs ate." You will find that the root of all their misery goes back to self-will and refusal to submit in their father's home.
The child is under the parent and, at the same time, answerable to Christ Himself. That double standing strengthens the parent's word and sets a limit on it.
It is of the first importance to notice that children are set in direct personal responsibility to the Lord. They are placed under parental authority. At the same time they are under responsibility to Christ, and so they are to obey "in the Lord." This at once defines both the character and the limit of their duty. The commands of the parent, when rightly given, have God's authority behind them, so the child obeys not only the parent but also the Lord. On the other hand, no command could be binding if the child could not obey it in the Lord.
Another writer shows what that limit looks like in practice:
There may be very unusual circumstances in which a parent asks a child to do something morally wrong — stealing, cheating, or worshipping an idol. This would be a plain exception. In that case the child should refuse to obey the parent, firmly but without defiance. Ephesians 6:1 reads, "Children, obey your parents in the Lord." So the child should always obey unless he is told to disobey the Lord.
- Ground. Obedience to parents already stood in nature and in the law. This verse lifts the same duty onto divine ground, where the parent's claim is the Lord's claim.
- Spring. Affection and conscience are good, but neither supplies power; the Lord Himself is the spring that makes duty easy and glad.
- Right. The reason given is fitness before God. It suits a parent to command and a child to obey. Self-will at home has been the first step in many ruined lives.
- Limit. "In the Lord" both binds and bounds. The child obeys the parent as obeying Christ, so no order that means disobeying Christ can bind him.
- Reach. The same three words govern wives, fathers, servants and masters. One Lord orders the whole household, not five separate rules.
Honour thy father and thy mother, which is the first commandment with a promise,
Paul is speaking to children in a Christian home, and he backs his instruction with the fifth of the Ten Commandments. So what does it mean to honour a father and mother, and why does a letter so full of grace lean on a law given to Israel?
Verse 1 tells children to obey. Verse 2 uses a different word, and one writer draws out the difference.
Obedience describes what children owe in conduct and action. "Honour" expresses something else — the settled feeling they should carry towards their parents. It is an unusually solemn word. It is the same word our blessed Lord uses when He says, "that all may honor the Son, just as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him." (John 5:23.) … To honour their parents, children must not only accept their position and their right to control them. They must also value and deeply respect them, as those the Lord has set in their place of authority.
Why does the apostle quote the Ten Commandments at all? Writers answer that the quotation shows what God thinks of this duty.
Children being subject to their parents is part of God's order as seen in nature. Under the law God attached a special blessing to keeping the commandment that laid down this duty. Christianity takes up the obligation, but moves it from natural to divine ground… So the duty of children, like that of wives, is tied to "the Lord." It is not merely what nature dictates, though nature is perfectly right here. It is the recognition of the Lord's claims, as represented in the parents. The Lord Himself, who "learned obedience," was the beautiful example of this. Scripture records that in His lifetime He went with His parents to Nazareth and "was submissive to them."… The law appears here not to show that believers are under it, but to prove the special value God attached to this duty. He even stepped outside the ordinary character of law by joining a promise to it — a promise that shows the link between this duty and earthly blessing.
That leaves the motive changed, even while the duty stands.
A father may be hard and cruel, but his children are still to honor him. A mother may even be irresponsible, but her children are to honor her — that is, to show proper respect. This is not a legal commandment for believers today, yet Ephesians 6:1 shows it still carries moral weight. Our motive is not to submit to legal demands, but to delight in pleasing God.
One thing sets this command apart from the other nine: its wording. The others carried a threat; this one carried an offer.
The command to honour father and mother was the first commandment with promise, as the apostle says when writing to the Ephesians. Other commandments had the threat of death attached to them. This one carried the promise of long life on the earth. The apostle's reasoning is this: if a Jewish child was not only bound, but encouraged by such a promise, to deeply respect his parents, how much more should a Christian child obey them — not merely in the law, but in the Lord.
The promise attached to this command was earthly — long life in the land. So how does it reach a Christian?
There is no real difficulty about the force and limits of this command. The relationship it deals with belongs to this life, and so does the promise. What the land was to the Israelite by natural descent, the word of grace now is to those who share in the heavenly calling. For them, godliness holds promise for the present life and also for the life to come (1 Tim 4:8).
But long life on earth is not promised to every obedient Christian.
There is no doubt a government of God going on through all the present time, and in it these things are fulfilled in a measure… As Christians, they may be taken from the earth when, simply as obedient children, they would have been kept on it. But the Christian's loss is gain, as we know.
The fifth commandment is not a small household rule. Breaking it once carried a severe penalty, and keeping it guards the commands that follow.
The penalty announced against the "stubborn and rebellious son," who would not "obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother," may seem very severe to us. But it shows how much importance God puts on this fifth commandment. If everyone kept it faithfully, there would be very little breaking of the five commandments that follow it.
- Honour — obedience covers what a child does; honour covers what a child feels. The same word describes the honour due to the Son, which sets the standard high.
- Ground — the duty starts in nature, but Christianity moves it onto divine ground. A child honours parents "in the Lord," and the Lord Himself was submissive to His own parents.
- Promise — this is the one command of the ten that came with an offer instead of a threat: long life on the earth.
- Reach — because God valued this duty so highly under law, the claim on a Christian child is greater, not smaller. Children owe respect even to a hard parent.
- Result — God still rewards obedience in this life, though He may take a believer home early. Where children keep this one command, they keep most of the rest with it.
that it may be well with thee, and that thou mayest be long-lived on the earth.
God attached a promise to the fifth commandment: things would go well, and life would be long. Paul lays that promise on Christian children, which raises a real question — does honouring your parents still guarantee a long life today?
Obeying parents belongs to the natural order, but Paul does not leave it there. One writer says the quotation does not prove that Christians live under the law.
Children being subject to their parents is part of God's order as seen in nature. Under the law, God attached a special blessing to keeping the commandment that laid down this duty. Christianity takes up the obligation, but moves it from natural ground to divine ground... The law is not brought in here to show that believers are under it. It is brought in to prove how much value God placed on this duty. He even stepped outside the ordinary character of law by joining the command to a promise, and that promise shows the link between this duty and earthly blessing.
God rewarded this one duty under law. The claim on those who now know Him as Father is greater, not smaller.
If that is how God valued a child's honour for his parents under law, is it worth less now — now that the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ makes His nature known and calls us into the relationship of sons to Himself? Respect for that old word met with His approval and reward in the righteous government of God. He watched over and prospered those who honoured their parents. So did His revelation of Himself in grace loosen the obligation for His children? Did it make the love that prompts and sustains such honour less precious in His own eyes now?
The wording carries either sense. One writer cites the promise to show the weight God gave the command, and then names the exception.
The apostle quotes the commandment along with the promise God attached to it in the Old Testament. He does not quote it as something absolutely true for the present time, but to show how important God held it to be... The promise reads "that it may go well with you and that you may live long on the earth" — or "in the land," which the connection would rather suggest. There is no doubt a government of God going on all through the present time, and in it these things have a measure of fulfilment... As Christians, they may be taken from the earth when, simply as obedient children, they would have been kept on it; but the Christian's loss is gain.
Others have felt the same difficulty and answered it the same way.
Paul refers to this promise, which has often been a difficulty to some, as though temporal promises now belonged to a certain line of conduct. The citation only shows us how much God valued obedience under the law. However, I believe there is a blessing belonging to obedience to parents. But in the order of the government of God, in the ways of God with us personally in this world, there are important things which modify this.
The promise belongs to this life, because the relationship it guards belongs to this life. One writer sets Israel's land beside what the believer holds now.
There is no real difficulty about the force and limits of this command. The relationship it deals with belongs to this life, and so does the promise. What the land was to the Israelite by natural descent, the word of grace now is to the one who shares the heavenly calling. For such a person, godliness holds a promise for the life that is now, as well as for the life to come. It is well with us, and we know and enjoy the Father's favour, as long as we are walking as obedient children in His light.
One writer points first to a son who threw this command off, then to children whose parents make it hard to keep.
Israel soon failed badly here. Absalom, son of David, rebelled against his father and tried to kill him, and his days were not long on the earth. A father may be hard and cruel, but his children are still to honour him. A mother may even be irresponsible, but her children are to honour her — that is, to show proper respect... Our motives are not to be those of submitting to legal demands, but of delighting to please God.
- Valued — God singled this duty out by attaching a promise to it, breaking the usual pattern of pure command.
- Transplanted — Christianity keeps the same duty, but moves it from natural ground to divine ground.
- Greater — if God rewarded such honour under law, the revelation of Himself as Father does not make it matter less.
- Governed — God still governs this way. A Christian may be taken from the earth early, and even that loss is gain.
- Unconditional — a hard father or a careless mother does not cancel the command; the motive is not legal duty but delight in pleasing God.
And [ye] fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but bring them up in [the] discipline and admonition of [the] Lord.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Bondmen, obey masters according to flesh, with fear and trembling, in simplicity of your heart as to the Christ;
The letter turns from parents and children to servants — people who worked under another person's authority. The instruction is startling. It is not a call to escape, but a call to serve a human master as if you were serving Christ.
The verse gives no hint of a call to change the system these servants lived under.
This next group in the household is unlike the others. Society, not nature, set up the relationship. The servants named here were slaves. Whether slavery is right or wrong, humane or cruel, is not the point here. Christianity takes people in the social position where it finds them, and shows how they may live Christ in that place. Its work is not to remodel society, but to teach the believer to display Christ.
Paul wrote to slaves. Does the verse still bind an employee who is free to resign?
Even if the care of God had not provided such an answer, one thing would still hold. Conditions are easier for servants now. To use that as a reason to deny their duty to their masters would be ungrateful and base. The ideas of liberty in our day have changed the state of husbands and wives, and of parents and children, almost as much as that of masters and servants. But wherever the relationship exists, the duty remains for each and all.
The same principles reach into ordinary paid work today.
The same principle applies to employees in any business. They are to take honest care to carry out every duty of their working relationships faithfully, with a sincere heart, as to Christ. If Christ is the Object of our service, it will never become a burden.
Obedience is the servant's first duty. It has one limit.
As you might expect from the very name, the primary duty of the servant is obedience... and, as with children, the obedience required is almost unlimited... The only limit lies in their higher obligations to the Lord. Scripture does not state this outright, but it clearly implies it when it says, "You are serving the Lord Christ." Up to that limit the servant owes full obedience — so long as the command does not intrude on what he owes to the Lord as His servant... In truth it is the Lord's rule in the household, worked out through the master, whom He holds responsible for its order.
The phrase sounds like cringing before a powerful man. The rest of the verse rules that out.
The words "with fear and trembling" do not in the least mean the slavish fear of man that lays a snare. That hardly needs saying. Such service could not be done "with a sincere heart," nor "as you would Christ." Besides, the next words rule this out too: servants are not to work only when watched, as people-pleasers, but as servants of Christ.
Read alongside the other places Paul uses it, the phrase carries a different weight.
I would point to Philippians 2 and 1 Corinthians 2, and places like them. They show that we ought not to lower "with fear and trembling" to mere dread of punishment. It is a sense of our own weakness, joined with a sense of solemn responsibility before God.
The word behind "sincere" is also used for generous giving. Its root meaning shows why.
The similar noun aplotees occurs eight times, and is translated in different ways: three times as "simplicity," twice as "singleness of heart," twice as "liberality," once as "bountifulness." It means literally "one-foldedness," a single, simple structure. So its meaning in Scripture is that there should be no hidden motive and no double-dealing in what a Christian does. He should be what people call "transparently honest."
The last words of the verse change the character of the work itself.
Here again the obligation moves out of the range of the old creation and links to Christ in glory. Like wives and children, the servants are called to give their obedience "as you would Christ." That at once lifts their duties above the legal force of the old system and above the legal contract of today. Even a slave's duties gained dignity and sweetness the moment he could say, "I am doing this to please Christ, not for reward and not to escape punishment."
That principle carries into the smallest jobs of daily life.
How good it is to know that our God graciously stoops to connect His name and His glory with the humblest duties of ordinary home life! This is what gives dignity, interest and freshness to every little act, from morning till night... It is not working for wages, but serving the Lord Christ.
- Place. Christianity does not rearrange your circumstances first. It takes you where you are and teaches you to display Christ there.
- Limit. The master's authority is earthly. Obey it almost without limit — but it stops where the Lord's claim begins.
- Fear. Not dread of punishment, but a sense of your own weakness and of solemn responsibility before God.
- Heart. A sincere heart is undivided: no hidden motive, no double-dealing.
- Master. Working as for Christ lifts the job above force and contract. The humblest task becomes service to the Lord Himself.
not with eye-service as men-pleasers; but as bondmen of Christ, doing the will of God from [the] soul,
Paul is writing to household slaves whose whole working day was under someone else's eye, and his words hit a habit anyone with a boss knows: working well when watched, then slacking when not. Behind it lies a bigger question — who is the real Master of a Christian's daily work?
The fault named here begins with where a worker's attention rests. One writer traces it to the direction of the servant's gaze:
"Not by the way of eye-service, as people-pleasers." The worker's eye is not to be on the master's face. If it is, he will be tempted to please the master, and so become a people-pleaser. The smallest duty loses its value before God if he does it for men instead of for Him. That would be walking by sight, and not by faith.
The test is simple and hard to dodge. It reaches the work nobody checks:
This guards against a common fault the apostle calls "eye-service." A Christian who wants to please the Lord works with the same energy and faithfulness behind his employer's back as in front of his face. He will not waste time because his master is away, or the foreman is in the next room. He will not put a fine shine on the boots he makes while the soles are mostly brown paper.
The verse does not just forbid a bad motive. It gives a better one. Because the worker belongs to Christ, the audience for his work changes:
What then guards against this eye-service that only pleases men? The lifting thought that we serve the Lord Christ. Our work is for the eye of the Lord in heaven, not only for the eye of the master on earth. Even the dullest work of the lowliest slave is still work done for the Lord of all.
"Doing the will of God from the heart" changes what the work is. It is no longer a transaction with an employer but obedience offered to Christ:
Here again the duty belongs no longer to the old order of this world, but to Christ in glory. Like wives and children, the servants are told to obey as they would obey Christ. That at once lifts their duties above both the force of the old law and the work contract of today. A slave's duties became noble and sweet at once if he could say, "I am doing this, not for reward, and not to escape punishment, but to please Christ."
Once a worker's eye is on the Lord, his work no longer rises and falls with the quality of his employer:
So the servants stand in the Lord's presence. They are the servants of Christ. They are to do the will of God from the heart, and to keep their eye on the Lord alone. Remembering this is the secret of all happy, cheerful service and of all true obedience. It also frees them from depending on what their masters are like. Christian servants would avoid many traps if they kept this in mind.
Paul tells slaves to serve well rather than to throw off their chains. One writer sees in this not defeat but a deeper freedom the believer already has:
Is it not worth noticing how wide and deep the liberty in Christ is? There is nothing violent here, and nothing revolutionary. Yet the change is complete, absolute, and final in its principle and character. A person still has to grow in valuing it and showing it. That growth matters, because it is Christianity worked out in practice… What a gift this is to the Christian slave! What a strong motive for a man who already knows he is free in Christ, with a freedom far above his circumstances.
The change is inward, so the job itself stays the same. That is what makes the witness visible:
The grace of God, which brings salvation to men of all ranks and degrees, does not need a change in a person's position in life. It teaches us how to make every position beautiful… People cannot help thinking of Christ when they see His people doing the hardest and most tiring work cheerfully, and without fault, for His sake. Self-interest pushes people to work well. A Christian should work better still, and more sincerely, out of love for Christ.
- Eye. Eye-service means the worker's eye is on the master's face. Then even the smallest duty loses its worth before God, because he does it for men. That is walking by sight instead of faith.
- Heart. The cure is not closer watching but a new audience. The work is for the Lord's eye in heaven, so it looks the same behind the employer's back as in front of it.
- Master. Serving the Lord Christ lifts duty above contract and force. The slave who could say "I am doing this to please Christ" found his tasks noble and sweet.
- Freedom. This freedom is real, yet it starts no revolt. The Christian worker is already free in Christ, above his circumstances, and so no longer depends on what his employer is like.
- Witness. Grace changes no one's job. It teaches us to make that job beautiful, so people cannot help thinking of Christ when they see hard, tiring work done cheerfully for His sake.
serving with good will as to the Lord, and not to men;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
knowing that whatever good each shall do, this he shall receive of [the] Lord, whether bond or free.
The last word to slaves in Ephesians is not a rule but a reason. Something is coming back to the one who serves. The promise is wide: every good thing, from anyone, whether the worker is owned or free.
These words go to people whose work was forced and whose treatment could be brutal. No one else hears the promise of reward so plainly:
Nowhere is the honour of Christ so closely tied to the conduct of the believer as in the case of the servant. The hardships of his lot, and the injustice and cruelty he might suffer, only made the power of the life of Christ in him stand out more. And no one else receives so clear a promise of reward: "knowing that whatever good anyone does, this he will receive back from the Lord, whether he is a bondservant or is free." What comfort for the suffering slave! He can look past the drudgery and unpaid labour of his lot here, and know that faithful work done gladly for the Lord's sake is not, and never will be, forgotten.
The verse names who pays. That matters, because a master on earth may never pay at all:
Did they serve unreasonable and cruel men? How lifting and steadying it was, then, to look past the man to the Lord, knowing that whatever good anyone does, he will receive it back from the Lord, whether he is a bondservant or free. If the reward fails here, it will surely come at the judgment seat of Christ. Christians are not called to reform the world as they pass through it, but to behave as heavenly people in the middle of it. These principles, though addressed to slaves, apply just as strongly to employed servants.
The last clause drops status from the reckoning. The Lord weighs not the size of the job but how it was done:
This principle applies to the poor slave, who is now Christ's servant and so truly free. Suppose the Lord has given him a lowly and trying service. That will be no dishonour to him in the day of final reward. Servant and master will stand together before their common Master. He will reward them not according to the place they filled, but according to the faithfulness with which they filled it. The Master then will be One who Himself took the very lowest place to serve us all.
The verse points forward to what the servant will receive. Writers describe two things running together: the Lord's notice now, and His settlement later.
All service, whatever its character, carries responsibility to the Lord, and here lies the encouragement. His eye is on the faithful servant. He marks his discouragements, trials and sorrows. He holds him up by His approval now, and by the hope of "the reward of the inheritance" he will receive at last from his Lord's hands. Soon He will settle accounts with all His servants. At His judgment seat (2 Cor. 5:10) each of us will receive what is due for what we have done in the body, whether good or bad.
The verse encourages the servant; the next verse warns the master. One writer sets the two side by side:
Hope and fear each have their healthy influence as springs that regulate conduct. Verse 8 states the first of these clearly. It reminds the Christian slave, and encourages him in doing good: whatever good anyone does, he will receive it back from the Lord, whether he is a bondservant or free. On the other hand, the next verse warns the master that there is One in heaven whom he also serves, and who shows no partiality.
A promised reward can slip into becoming the reason for working. Writers guard against that without dropping the promise:
Not even the cup of cold water given in His name will be forgotten on that coming day. It is not in the heart of Christ to forget the least thing, however simple, done by the humblest of His disciples out of love to His name. And even if the service never gets done, He remembers the honest desire to serve and please Him. Love rewards, but working for reward and working for love are two different things. The labourer in the vineyard who worked for his coin got his coin, but he did not get his master's smile. It is the Christian's happy privilege to work for love.
- Knowing — the verse gives the reason behind the whole passage. The servant works gladly because he knows who watches and what is coming.
- Any — the promise covers every good thing, down to a cup of cold water, and even the honest desire to serve that never got done.
- Lord — the payer is not the master. Where an employer here never repays faithful work, the judgment seat of Christ will.
- Bondservant or free — the Lord measures reward not by the place a person filled, but by the faithfulness he filled it with. Master and servant stand before one impartial Master.
- Love — the reward is certain, yet working for reward and working for love differ. The labourer who worked for his coin got his coin, not his master's smile.
And, masters, do the same things towards them, giving up threatening, knowing that both their and your Master is in heaven, and there is no acceptance of persons with him.
Paul has just told slaves how to work; now, in one sentence, he turns and speaks to the men who own them. The command runs in both directions, and the reason he gives is that the master has a Master of his own.
What a master gives his servants depends on what he knows of his own Master:
A Christian master and mistress may realise in their consciences the authority of their Master in heaven, and in their hearts His goodness and kindness. As far as they do, they will "do the same things" to their servants that they wish their servants would do to them. They will give their servants "that which is just" — a matter of conscience towards Christ. And not only what is just, but also what is "equal" (or "fair"), as a matter of the heart in kindness.
The one thing forbidden by name is threatening. Every master knows the pull toward it:
Wilful neglect or careless work displeases a master. Everyone knows how strongly he is then tempted to speak harshly, and even to threaten punishment. How many masters have dismissed a valuable servant this way! Feelings rose, the words came out, and pride, it may be, refused to take them back. So the servant has left. The Scriptures show a better way — refraining from threats.
There is also a practical reason why threats are poor tools of government:
Masters should not use threats either. Threats usually come out of temper. If the master does not carry them out, his authority grows weaker. If he does carry them out to keep his authority, it often hurts both master and servant.
The verse does not say only "your Master." It names Him as Master of both sides, and that wording carries weight:
This verse should read, I believe, "their Master and yours is in the heavens." That adds a point of importance: both master and servant are responsible to the one Lord, and will stand together at the same judgment seat.
That shared ownership levels the ground without cancelling the earthly order:
They will govern, and govern firmly, as they should, because God has entrusted their authority to them. But they will remember that those under them answer directly to their Master in heaven. Along with themselves, those servants are the Lord's servants. So in this respect there is equality, despite the difference in their positions on earth.
If the servant belongs to Christ too, then the master's rights stop somewhere:
The words "knowing that he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven" make the principle clear. The Lord's authority limits the authority of masters, and indeed masters are subject to it. So masters are supreme in their own area, and may call for obedience that far. But if they try to push into the wider circle where the Lord alone is supreme, their servants are released from their obligations.
The closing words speak to both sides, but they carry a warning for the man with the power:
Earth recognises and permits social distinctions, but they have no existence in Christ's judgment. Even a Christian master might forget that. Master and servant will all answer to Him. A low position might cause discouragement; to that person He holds out the prospect of reward for faithful service. A high position might lead to oppression; to that person He holds out the judgment that will follow an abuse of power.
Why does Paul regulate slavery instead of ending it? Writers answer that the gospel works from another direction:
The Christian religion has found its way into the middle of evil, and given liberty where there was none. It has given liberty even to poor slaves, without taking them out of their state of bondage. The gospel does not touch that position. Paul acknowledges slavery as a right when he sends the slave Onesimus back to his owner. He tells that owner that in grace he would treat this slave as a brother.
The setting has changed; the principle has not.
Believing bosses should be just with their employees and give them fair wages. They should give what is just for the body, the soul and the spirit of the employee. These commands reflect the thoughts of the Lord Jesus Christ for the workplace.
- One Master. The verse names Him Master of both slave and owner — "their Master and yours" — so the man in charge is under orders himself.
- One standard. They share one Master, so the master owes his servant "the same things": what is just, from conscience, and what is fair, from the heart.
- One limit. His authority is real, but it has an edge. Where it reaches into what belongs to the Lord alone, the servant no longer owes obedience.
- One thing banned. The verse forbids one thing by name: threats. Spoken in temper, they cost good servants and weaken the very authority they were meant to defend.
- One judgment seat. God shows no partiality, so both stand there together. The servant nobody noticed receives his reward; the master nobody could challenge gives his account.
For the rest, brethren, be strong in [the] Lord, and in the might of his strength.
The letter has just told ordinary people how to live at home and at work. Now it changes tone: before it names a single enemy, it calls them to be strong in the Lord.
Commentators notice what the verse does not do. It does not open by sizing up the enemy.
"Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might." This is like the first sound of a trumpet. To what does it call the saints — does it call you? Not to survey the enemy's stronghold, or to show you what you have to overcome, but to turn all your thoughts gently to the Lord Himself. Before it says a word about enemies or conflicts, it calls you to survey your strength. That strength is the mighty Lord, seated at the right hand of God in the heavenly places.
The hard part of this command is what you have to admit. We would rather be strong in something we can count.
The Apostle points our thoughts to the power that is for us. Only then does he describe the power against us. To face this conflict we must always remember that all our strength is in the Lord. Our difficulty is often to realise that we have no strength in ourselves. We would like to be strong in numbers, strong in gifts, or strong in the power of some forceful leader. But our real and only strength is "in the Lord and in the strength of His might".
Weakness, then, is not the obstacle. It is the doorway — and the foe we face has already lost to the One we lean on.
The word "Finally" (older translations read "Finally, my brothers") shows that what we have considered leads up to this climax. On our own we are no match for the enemy. But the Lord has met him and overcome him. If we are strong in Him, our very weakness makes room for the one power that can defeat him. He showed the might of His strength when He went down into the enemy's territory, overcame him, and led a host of captives. We have to meet a foe whose power the Lord has broken, but who still tries to overcome us by his tricks.
The title used here is "the Lord" — the One with authority. That shapes what the command asks of us.
"Be strong in the Lord" means: be wholly subject to the Lord's authority. That subjection is true strength. It opens to us the power of His might — an inward, living strength that evil cannot overcome, even when we look weak.
The strength named in the verse is not vague. Earlier in the same letter the writer had already measured it, and the comparison is the point.
The prayer of the first chapter brings before us the power of God's might. God has raised Christ from the dead and set Him at His own right hand in heavenly places, "far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and above every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the one to come". Now, says the Apostle, that is the "immeasurable greatness of His power toward us who believe". The power against us is far greater than our own. But the power toward us surpasses every power that opposes us.
The verb itself suggests something received rather than worked up.
The real idea here is a passive one. "Be strengthened in the Lord." There can be no real difficulty in understanding this. Who has not talked over their troubles with a friend, and come away stronger for the sympathy and advice? It is far more true of the Lord. When we keep coming to Him, His power flows into us — power greater than anything that can stand against us in the spiritual battle.
We need this strength for something specific: holding on to what already belongs to us.
All our blessings are in the heavenly places in Christ. Satan and his angels are still there, so we have to fight for every bit of ground we hold... God gave the whole land of promise to Israel... But they had to fight for every inch of it to hold it in practice. So the heavenly places are ours — but how much have we laid hold of?
- Look up first. The call turns your eyes to the Lord before it mentions the enemy. Survey your strength, not the enemy's stronghold.
- Own your weakness. Numbers, gifts and strong leaders are not the strength meant here. Admitting you have none of your own makes room for the only power that defeats the foe.
- Submit, and be strengthened. Being subject to the Lord's authority is itself strength. You receive that strength by coming to Him again and again, and His power flows in.
- Measure the power. It is the same might that raised Christ and set Him far above every rule and authority. That power surpasses everything against us.
- Hold the ground. The blessings in heavenly places are already ours; the fight is over how much of them we take hold of.
Put on the panoply of God, that ye may be able to stand against the artifices of the devil
The letter to the Ephesians ends with a call to get dressed for battle. Two questions follow: whose armour is it, and why does the verse warn about the devil's tricks and not his strength?
The armour comes at the end of the letter. Writers tie that to its subject: the higher the ground, the harder the attack.
The enemy contests the highest position hardest. Where we are most clearly Christian, he will oppose us with all his power... When Israel reached Canaan, the land God had given them, that was exactly where they had to fight. They had to fight to possess what God had already made theirs. So we must remember what this conflict is about. We will hardly feel it unless we are set on possessing what is already ours.
The verse does not tell us to stand against the devil's might. Writers press that difference, and they trace it back to the cross.
We have to stand, not so much against the devil's strength — Christ dealt with that — as against his tricks. The truth is that the cross made him a defeated enemy for us, and we always have the right to treat him that way... His tricks are what we should always fear most. To resist them we need to put on the full armour of God.
Open attack is easier to survive than a friendly approach. One writer shows this from Israel's history: a walled city did not frighten them, but crafty neighbours beat them.
Many people can stand his roar, yet his tricks beat them. Israel could look calmly at the high walls of Jericho, because they knew God was with them. But the crafty Gibeonites, a neighbouring people who fooled them, beat them completely. How treacherous our poor hearts are! We cannot trust them!
A trick works by looking harmless, so the problem is spotting it. One writer offers a simple test.
A trick is something that looks fair and innocent, and yet lures the soul away from the path of obedience. How often the devil tries to lead those who have the truth into a side-path. At the start it turns away so slightly that objecting to it would seem fussy. Each of us can ask one simple question that exposes every trick: "If I follow this course, where will it lead me?"
The words "of God" mean more than good quality. Every piece is a gift from God, meant to be used for Him.
God gives this armour to the Christian, so that he may be for God in the very place where the devil's tricks are at work. Not one piece of it is against God, not one piece stands between the soul and Him. God puts Himself behind the armour, as if He said, "I am here behind the armour with you." It comes from Him, to be used for Him.
This also explains why no shop sells it. It is not equipment strapped on from outside.
But there is a full suit of armour that He Himself made. It can resist every weapon the enemy's craft has forged against us. No part of it is like the gear made to stop physical weapons. You cannot buy it in a shop and put it on like a coat or a hat. It is all shaped in the soul, and is spiritual in nature, and no weapon of the enemy can pierce any part of it.
Two words in the command carry weight. The first is a duty, and it does not happen by itself.
The armour has to be "put on". Being Christians does not mean we have put it on. The armour is provided for us as Christians, but it remains with us to put it on. It is not enough to look at the armour, or to admire it, or to be able to describe it.
The second word rules out picking and choosing, because a gap is exactly what the enemy is looking for.
It is no good having part of it on and another part missing. Satan will be quick to notice the gap, and we cannot be rightly for God if we are not for Him in every way.
Put the armour on in advance. Do not scramble for it once the attack lands.
But there are times when the enemy makes special attacks on God's people. He wants to rob them of particular truths. Such attacks make an evil day for the people of God. To meet them we need to have on the whole armour of God. It is too late to be putting on the armour in the middle of the struggle.
- Contested — the ground most worth holding is the ground under attack. The fight is to possess what God has already made ours.
- Craft — the verse warns about trickery, not force. The cross broke his strength, so his side-paths beat believers, not his roar.
- Given — every piece comes from God, and He stands behind it with us. It grows in the soul; no shop sells it.
- Whole — one missing piece leaves one place exposed, and Satan finds it fast. Admiring the armour is not wearing it.
- Early — put it on before the evil day, because nobody dresses for battle once the fighting has started.
because our struggle is not against blood and flesh, but against principalities, against authorities, against the universal lords of this darkness, against spiritual [power] of wickedness in the heavenlies.
Paul ends his letter by naming the opposition a Christian faces, and it is not human. That raises two questions. Who are these unseen powers? And why does a believer who is already blessed in heaven still have to fight?
The first thing the verse removes is the assumption that our real trouble comes from people. Commentators point out that the enemy uses hostile people, but those people are not the source.
First, we are told to remember that it is not against flesh and blood that we wrestle. The devil may indeed use men and women to oppose the Christian and deny the truth. But we have to look past those people and see the one who is using them. At Philippi, a city where Paul preached, a human woman opposed him. But Paul saw the evil spirit that was moving her. In the power of the Name of Jesus Christ he took up the fight with that spiritual wickedness. He commanded the evil spirit to come out of her (Acts 16:16-18).
The older English rendering "high places" has misled readers. Writers stress that the right word is "heavenly," not "high." They also link this fight to Israel's wars in Canaan.
The translators showed how strange the thought was to them. They put "high" into the text instead of "heavenly." But here the devil and his angels stand where the armies of Canaan stood when Joshua and Israel fought them.
(Canaan was the land God promised to Israel. Joshua led the people in to take it. The nations already living there fought them for every field.)
The four titles are not repetition. One writer reads them as real beings with authority. Their evil runs two ways at once: over the world, and against believers.
The conflict, then, is against Satan and his hosts, whatever the instrument used. Principalities and powers are spiritual beings in a position of rule with power to carry out their will... Toward the world they are the rulers of the darkness of this world. Toward Christians they are the "spiritual power of wickedness in the heavenly places". The world is in darkness. It does not know God. These spiritual beings rule and direct that darkness — the darkness of paganism, philosophy, so-called science and unbelief. They direct the superstitions, corruptions and modern errors of the Christian world too. The Christian is brought into the light... So the opposition to the Christian has a religious character. Spiritual beings try to rob him of the truth of his heavenly calling. They try to draw him into a path that denies that truth, or into conduct that does not match it.
Israel fought men for land. We fight spirits over the enjoyment of what is already ours.
For us, the fight is not with flesh and blood, as Israel's fight was. Our blessings are spiritual in the heavenly places... Israel had passed through the wilderness — had crossed the Jordan; the manna had stopped; they ate the grain of the land... So it is with the Christian... We are sitting in the heavenly places in Him, so that we may enjoy the things of heaven as the fruit of our own country. But conflict is before us, if we want to enjoy them practically... The enemy is subtle. We have to withstand his tricks even more than his power.
The enemy works by deception, so his attacks land on what we believe.
Let us name a few of these tricks. Teaching that breeds unbelief. Empty superstitions. Evil doctrines. False ideas about where the world's history is going. Here we are not dealing with our own desires. We are in conflict with the enemy's direct attacks... Here we stand face to face with Satan, with the deceit of unrighteousness, and with false teaching. These are the things we are to resist.
Others add that the state of the fighter matters: unjudged flesh disarms us, since "we cannot carry the flesh into the heavenly conflict."
The titles sound overwhelming until they are measured against God's own title.
There are "the rulers of the darkness of this world." A closer rendering is "the world-rulers of this darkness." These are Satanic authorities and powers that rule this world of darkness. We might well fear them if we were not under the protection of the Lord Almighty. The word translated Almighty is literally the All-ruler. The world-rulers may be great. But they are nothing in the presence of the All-ruler. It is like this world: great to us, yet tiny beside all things — the mighty universe of God.
- See — the opposition in front of you is an instrument; the wrestling is with the one using it.
- Locate — the word is "heavenly," not "high." These enemies hold the very place where your blessings are. The Canaanites held Israel's land the same way.
- Recognise — they rule the world's darkness, and they attack believers through religion, to rob them of the truth of their heavenly calling.
- Contest — the blessings are already yours. The fight is only over enjoying them now, and you win it against tricks more than against force.
- Measure — world-rulers stand before the All-ruler; great as they are, they are nothing there.
For this reason take [to you] the panoply of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and, having accomplished all things, to stand.
Verse 13 repeats the command of verse 11, but now it follows a hard look at the enemy: unseen powers, not human opponents. So what makes a day "the evil day", and why is the goal of all this fighting simply to stand?
Notice first whose armour this is:
The first thing to notice is that the Holy Spirit calls on us to take up the full armour of God. Neither the strength nor the wisdom of man is of any use in this conflict. Since we have to do with the hosts of Satan on the one hand, we need on the other "the whole armour of God." Our natural character and habits may not matter where the Spirit of God is at work to save our souls in His grace. But they matter greatly in the presence of a foe who knows how to take advantage of every unguarded opening.
None of this armour protects us from God. He gives it for use on His side:
It is of the greatest importance for us to understand that this armour is given to us on God's part, given to the Christian by God so that he may be for God in the very place where the wiles of the devil are at work. Not one bit of the armour is against God, not one bit of it stands between the soul and Him. God puts Himself, as it were, behind the armour, as if He said, "I am here behind the armour with you."
Being a Christian and being armed are two different things:
The armour has to be "put on." It by no means follows that because we are Christians we have put on the armour. It remains with us to put it on. It is not enough to look at the armour, or to admire it, or to be able to describe it; we must "put on the whole armour of God."
And it is the whole armour. A partial outfit is an invitation:
Here the apostle repeats the exhortation of verse 11. His own mind is deeply impressed with the frightful array of our foes... "Therefore take to yourselves the whole armour of God." No part must be left unguarded. The enemy knows how to take advantage of the smallest opening.
The phrase carries two layers:
In a general sense the whole period of Christ's absence is an "evil day" for the believer. There are, however, occasions when the enemy makes special attacks upon the people of God, seeking to rob them of special truths. Such attacks constitute for the people of God an evil day. To meet these we need to have on the whole armour of God.
One writer describes what such a season looks like, and how it ends:
But there are moments when this power is allowed to show itself in a more particular way. The enemy then uses the world against the saints. He darkens the light which shines in it from God, and he troubles and leads astray the minds of professing Christians and even of believers. Our part is to do all that the confession of His name requires, whatever it costs, and to be found standing when the storm and the evil day are past.
A soul still unsure whether God is for him has no strength to spare for the fight:
The season of conflict is not the time for putting on the armour. If I am merely trying to grasp and get hold of Christ while in conflict, I cannot have peace of soul. Then there will be no power "to withstand in the evil day." ... You will never fight Satan with energy so long as you are asking, "Am I on the Lord's side or not?" "Is God for me or against me?"
The most dangerous hour can be the one after a victory:
How often the victory of faith is too great for the faith that won it! A believer who has defeated the enemy for a long time, and freshly too, may tire of the struggle and turn aside into a path that looks easier. He then proves his own folly and his very great danger, even if in the end God delivers him by pure mercy. So resisting is not enough. "Having done all," having finished everything required, we are still "to stand."
This is a fight to keep ground, not to conquer it:
We are in possession of our place, and our business is to hold it... It is not a matter of gaining ground on Satan as if he were in possession. The object of the enemy is to turn us away from this by whatever trick and manoeuvre. So in conflict the matter is to stand against the wiles, and having done all to stand.
- Take — the armour is God's, not ours; human ability contributes nothing against unseen powers.
- Take all of it — the whole armour, because the enemy looks for a single unguarded opening.
- Take it early — arm before the attack, never in the middle of the struggle.
- Withstand — "the evil day" is both this whole age and the particular seasons when the enemy's power presses hard.
- Stand — after the fight is won, we still have to hold the ground; the goal is to be found standing when the storm has passed.
Stand therefore, having girt about your loins with truth, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness,
The verse names the first two pieces of the armour, and a soldier puts both on before the fight starts. The quotes below use the older wording, "the loins girded," for what the ESV calls "the belt of truth" — a belt that braces the body for action.
One writer warns against reading "stand" here as a description of our place before God.
The true sense of these words supposes not only a settled position, but the soul in activity at the call of the Holy Spirit. Much harm has come from treating this passage as if it were about standing. It is something quite different. It is practical arming and conflict. It rests on the most blessed standing anywhere revealed in the New Testament, and it makes a fitting close to the letter that reveals that standing.
Another writer names the one place where no armour is needed, and what the belt grips here.
Before God our righteousness is perfect. It is Christ Himself, and we are the righteousness of God in Him. But we do not need armour there. We are sitting in the heavenly places: all is peace, all is perfect. But here we need armour, real practical armour, and first of all to have the loins girded with truth. The loins are the place of strength when they are properly girded, but they stand for the intimate affections and movements of the heart. If we let our hearts wander where they like, instead of staying in communion with God, Satan has an easy hold on us.
The picture behind the words comes from clothing and from soldiering at once.
Girding means applying truth to the soul. The word deals closely with the will and with the movements of the heart. This is arming for conflict in a most practical and effective way. But we must do it in the presence of God, before we meet the enemy. The soldier's belt holds the rest of his armour close to him, so he can march and is strong to fight... There is also a reference to an eastern custom. People there tied their long loose robes up around the waist, so the cloth would not get in the way while they travelled or worked.
Owning the truth and being held by it are two different things.
To know the truth and be set free by the truth is one thing; to have our loins girded with truth is another. It is the intimate dealing of truth with the soul, so that there is no laxity of heart or indulged will, but instead the affections and judgment braced up to Christ and the things of Christ.
Which is why a shelf of sound teaching is not by itself a defence.
Girding up the loins means getting ready for action. Truth is to set the limits of all we do. The truth is to govern us. God gives us the truth, but we must put it on... God's word is truth. But the truth in the Bible will not defend us. What defends us is truth applied in a practical way to all we do.
The second piece covers uprightness in daily life. Where it is missing, the enemy attacks.
The breastplate of righteousness is not divine righteousness. It is uprightness of heart before Him, a clear conscience in simple uprightness in what we are doing... There is no good conscience without it. If you do not have a good conscience, Satan soon knows you have a bad one. He will touch you on that point and play on it, for he is a master of tricks.
Yet the two kinds of righteousness are not rivals — one rests on the other.
The righteousness we have been speaking about is quite different from the righteousness of God. In that righteousness we stand accepted in Christ Jesus. He is our righteousness, complete and unchangeable in the presence of God — but not as a breastplate. All conflict is over there. Here we still need practical righteousness, so that we can fight our enemy the devil and win. Still, the righteousness of God which we are made in Christ Jesus is the foundation of the other.
Truth is named first because the second piece depends on it.
This armour is not like the armour people once wore on the battlefield. An armourer made that armour for them, and they put it on when they were about to fight. You put this armour on from the inside, like the feathers of a bird. It all has to do with our practical state. So if truth has not girded your loins, you will never wear the armour of righteousness, because this is practical righteousness.
- Standing first. The armour does not win a place before God. Those already sitting in the heavenly places wear it, to hold their ground against Satan.
- Belted inwardly. Truth grips the affections and the will, the way a belt gathers loose robes. We fasten it in God's presence, before the enemy appears.
- Worn, not shelved. Truth in the Bible defends no one; truth applied to our actual habits does.
- Covered outwardly. Practical righteousness guards the conscience. It grows out of the righteousness God has already made us in Christ.
- In that order. We put this armour on from the inside out: no truth within, no righteousness without, and no ground held when the enemy comes.
and shod your feet with [the] preparation of the glad tidings of peace
Paul's armour list runs from the belt of truth and the breastplate of righteousness down to the soldier's feet, and the piece there is odd: shoes made of a gospel. So does this mean telling others the good news, or standing firm in it yourself?
Where the ESV says "readiness," these writers quote the older rendering "preparation." Either way, the shoe is what keeps the soldier standing.
The feet of the soldier of Christ — that is, every believer — must be steadied and strengthened by the preparation the gospel of peace gives. Only then can he hold his ground in such a contest. In short, the believer must have "peace with God," which is the fruit of believing the gospel of peace. Only think of a soldier going into battle badly shod, or with torn boots, especially over stony or muddy ground! How can he hold his ground against the enemy with his feet blistered and wounded?
One writer rules out evangelism here. The believer is handed a place to stand, not a message to deliver.
"Your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace." Some insist this means going out to preach the gospel; it is nothing of the kind. It is the soul walking up and down in that blessed avenue "the gospel of peace" — day after day, in real life. You can go out and preach the gospel, and announce it, without being there yourself. God may even bless it. But when He speaks of the armour, He does not mean mere ability to go out and announce it. He means you yourself in the full, blessed, daily, hourly enjoyment of the gospel of peace.
Commentators differ on how far to press that. Another writer holds both together.
It is a wonderful privilege to carry with us wherever we go the message of the gospel of peace. God has given this privilege to all His saints; it is not the preacher's alone… This preparation is not only for speaking the word of the gospel of peace. It is also so that peace matching the gospel marks every step we take.
If peace with God is the shoe leather, the supply never runs out.
This does not mean preaching the gospel to others, Christian service or soul winning. Through the gospel we have perfect peace with God. We know that God is for us; who then can be against us? This perfect peace, in which we stand, is our preparation… Israel wandered over desert rocks and desert sands for forty years with shoes that did not wear out. We too travel through the wilderness with our feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace. That peace will last as long as God Himself… He cannot touch anyone who rests in the peace of God and trusts in the God of peace.
Shoes meet the road. Rough ground brings dirt, and it tempts us to take charge ourselves.
The peace of the gospel is to apply itself to all the circumstances of the way… And as the shoe would arm us against the defilement of the way, so it guards against its dust and dirt. Can anything better keep us from falling under the power of circumstances — and so inevitably being defiled by them — than the quiet assurance that our God and Father holds them in His hand? To be ruffled and disturbed by them throws us off balance. We then try our own methods of putting things right, and our methods grow less careful as unbelief gains on us.
The same shoes change how a believer meets what others do to him.
Selfishness will always be a quarrelsome thing; it says, I must maintain my rights. But the Christian carries peace, because he has peace within; he carries the spirit and character of Christ through the world… A man can walk untouched through everything they can bring against him; his feet are shod.
The image works because the soles are tender.
Our feet must have battle shoes on, for the soles of the feet are sensitive… We need something that protects us against sensitive feelings that can lead us into wrong paths and wrong company. That protection is "the preparation of the gospel of peace"… Let us watch that our shoes are always on our feet. Then we are not so easily hurt by the words, actions or inactions of our brothers and sisters in Christ, or of unbelievers.
- Peace received. The gospel of peace first settles the believer's standing with God. That peace is what the shoes are made of.
- Peace worn. Knowing the message is not enough. Most commentators press daily enjoyment of it, not preaching it.
- Peace applied. Shoes touch the ground, so this peace meets daily circumstances. It keeps a believer from grabbing control when things go wrong.
- Peace carried. Self demands its rights; a person at peace carries Christ's spirit through the world.
- Peace that holds. Feet are tender and the ground is rough, yet these shoes never wear out. That is how the soldier keeps his footing.
besides all [these], having taken the shield of faith with which ye will be able to quench all the inflamed darts of the wicked one.
The armour so far has covered truth, righteousness and peace; this verse adds a piece that goes over all the rest. What is this faith, and what are these burning arrows?
The pieces before this describe a state. This one has to be actively used.
The shield was the one defence the soldier could not do without. Without it, the rest of his armour could not protect him from missiles. It is the same in our spiritual warfare. We cannot enjoy truth, righteousness or peace unless faith is in active use.
The word "over" matters here.
This is to be "over all". Faith in God, faith in His promises, faith in His Word, simple childlike faith is to cover the head and the body like a great shield.
So what is this faith? One writer traces it back to God's own nature.
This means the confidence in God Himself which the soul has every right to hold, and is encouraged to hold. I say, in Himself, because it cannot be separated from the godly and righteous state that the earlier parts of the armour show. Yet it is a confidence that springs only from what God is known to be in His own nature and character.
Another writer sums it up in a motto for the shield.
It is the full assurance of the heart in the love of God, according to the revelation which He has given of Himself. "God for us" should be written across the Christian shield… Notice, this is more than the faith that simply receives God's testimony about Christ for salvation — though of course it rests on that.
Both words in the verse come from real warfare. Start with the arrows.
FIERY DARTS are darts tipped with material that catches fire in flight or on impact. They burn as well as pierce.
The shield is large, and soldiers used it side by side. The fire has a meaning of its own.
If you put down your shield in front of you, and the man next to you puts down his in front of him, and so on and so on, you have a wall. It is a position that cannot be broken. That seems to be the picture here. Notice that they are fiery darts, not just darts. In Scripture fire often pictures God in judgment: "our God is a consuming fire" (Heb. 12:29).
The name of the defence tells you the nature of the attack.
Faith can quench nothing but its opposite, which is unbelief. All the darts of the Wicked One, fiery as they are, are of that kind… The cruellest wounds the soul can suffer are suggestions of unbelief. Outward trials are nothing next to a dart that is fiery in itself, and whose heat dries up the moisture of the spirit. It does this by cutting off our view of Him who is our only confidence and joy.
These attacks come in many forms.
Satan's darts are many and varied. They include subtle deceit, insinuation, flattery, intimidation, wrong teaching or wrong emphasis, lack of balance, working on the emotions, enticements to sin, and many more. Only an active, watchful confidence in the Lord will keep us ready to meet and quench these darts as we should.
One writer points to Job. The sharpest thrust came through his own wife.
His wife said to Job, "Curse God and die." That was a cruel thrust. But Job met it with the shield of faith, the very thing our verse describes: "Shall we receive good from God, and shall we not receive evil?" (Job 2:9-10). And the fiery dart fell to the ground.
The Lord Himself used the same two weapons.
The two weapons the Lord used — the Shield of Faith and the Sword of the Spirit — we may use also. Indeed, we are told to take hold of them so that we may "extinguish all the flaming darts of the evil one."
One writer adds a practical warning about the armour underneath.
You cannot hold up the shield of faith if you do not have the inside armour on. That means the belt of truth around your waist and the gospel of peace under your feet, enjoyed here and now. Then you have power to hold up the shield of faith.
- Placement. The shield goes over everything else. Without it, truth, righteousness and peace are not enough.
- Content. It is confidence in God Himself, sure that His favour never changes. That is more than the faith which first received Christ.
- Target. The burning arrows are suggestions of unbelief, aimed at cutting off your view of the God you trust.
- Reach. They come as flattery, intimidation, wrong teaching, enticement. So faith must be active and watchful, not occasional.
- Result. Job answered his wife, and the dart fell to the ground. The Lord used the same shield, and so may we.
Have also the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is God's word;
The armour ends with two pieces: a helmet to wear and a sword to use. Commentators press hard on why the sword comes last, and on which word counts as a sword at all.
Writers link the helmet to the settled knowledge of being saved, and warn what happens without it.
The helmet rests on the head. It covers the head, the place where we think. Assurance of salvation — past, present and future — is this helmet. As we wear it, and as it rules our mind and heart, the devil's tricks cannot land on us. We have a salvation that is secure... It is sad to see thousands of believers without the helmet of salvation. They have no assurance of salvation, so they are easy prey to the devil's tricks.
The picture comes from an older prophecy about Christ in armour, though He wears it for a different purpose.
This surely comes from the Old Testament prophecy which speaks of Christ putting on "righteousness as a breastplate, and a helmet of salvation on His head" (Isa. 59:17). But with Christ it is the righteousness He carries out in judgment. It is the salvation He brings as the deliverer of His people. With us it is the righteousness and salvation we have in Him.
The order of the pieces is not accidental. Everything that defends comes first; only then the weapon that attacks.
The helmet of salvation is the bold and joyful awareness of the full deliverance God has worked for us in Christ. This crowns the various parts of the armour already noticed. So what follows is not another means of defence — the defence is complete — but the weapon for attacking the enemy: the sword of the Spirit, God's word. How wise it is to place it last of all!... If we do not know this order in practice, we make the word a mere toy, or a whip for self, instead of the sword of the Spirit; we misuse it and it has no power.
The order carries a personal warning: do not swing a text that has never cut you.
Nothing is more dangerous than to use the word if it has not touched my conscience. I put myself in Satan's hands if I go beyond what I have from God, or beyond what my soul holds.
Notice the order inside the verse, and then whose sword this is.
The helmet comes before the sword: without this confidence, this assurance, we cannot even handle the sword of the Spirit. Without it Satan can use even the word of God to overthrow us. This word is called the sword of the Spirit, not of the understanding, but of the Spirit in us. It is the Spirit of God who alone can handle the sword of the word. It is the Spirit who recalls the suitable passage at the moment of temptation... We may reason about the things of God, but reasoning does nothing for us against the enemy. The Spirit must act in us and apply the word.
The verse does not say the word of God is the sword of the Spirit; it says take the Spirit's sword, which is the word of God. The distinction matters, because the enemy quotes Scripture too.
Satan knows how to use Scripture against the truth. A piece of Scripture taken out of its connection has kept many a saint in bondage, pressed him hard, and wounded him. That is not the sword of the Spirit. So the Word of God is not always the sword of the Spirit. But the sword of the Spirit must always and only be the Word of God.
The word used here is narrower than the whole Bible. It points to the fitting word for the moment.
The sword of the Spirit is "the word (literally, the saying) of God" — not the word of God in general, but the word that applies, the word spoken at the right time. It is not the whole Bible we are to bring to someone, but the word that fits his actual condition. This needs wisdom and the Spirit's guidance.
Jesus showed how the sword works when Satan tempted Him in the wilderness.
The Christian cannot "fight the good fight" by natural wisdom or powers of argument. In the wilderness our Lord defeated Satan by using the sword of the Spirit. Three times He quoted from Deuteronomy, and began each quotation with the words, "It is written." We need to know our Bibles to use our sword.
- Covered — The helmet is assurance of salvation. It guards the mind, and without it a believer is easy prey.
- Crowned — Assurance completes the defence. Nothing more is needed to guard you; the next piece is for attack.
- Cutting — God's word is the only weapon for attack. Let it cut your own conscience first, before you use it on anyone else.
- Carried — The sword belongs to the Spirit, not to your own reasoning. He brings the fitting passage to mind when temptation comes.
- Correct — Satan can use a verse pulled out of its context. Only the fitting word, in season, is the Spirit's sword — as Jesus showed when He said, "It is written."
praying at all seasons, with all prayer and supplication in [the] Spirit, and watching unto this very thing with all perseverance and supplication for all the saints;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
and for me in order that utterance may be given to me in [the] opening of my mouth to make known with boldness the mystery of the glad tidings,
Paul ends his description of the armour by asking the church at Ephesus to pray — not for all saints only, but for him. What does he ask them to pray for? And why is "the mystery of the gospel" the thing he needs help to say?
The chapter has just called every believer to constant prayer for all the saints. Then Paul puts himself inside that circle. One commentator sees this as a kindness to the readers.
Last of all comes activity for others, just as before there was dependence for ourselves… What a gracious way to encourage and strengthen believers! It gives them a sense of the value of their prayers, both in God's sight and in fellowship with the most blessed apostle God ever gave the church. … He felt his own need and the need of the work.
The request was not a formality.
No doubt, as an apostle of Christ, he was in one sense independent of their prayers… But he felt two things too deeply: the reality of his own weakness, and the blessing of spiritual fellowship. So he valued with all his heart every genuine expression of sympathy towards him.
He is writing from prison. The obvious thing to ask for is freedom. He does not ask for it.
Great servant of God though he was, he wanted the prayers of others who were not so great as he was. But he asked for prayer with one aim. Not that he might be let out of prison and his circumstances made easier, but that he might finish his ministry in full, even as a prisoner.
He asks that speech be given him. Even after years of preaching and repeated fillings of the Spirit, he treats the right word as something he cannot manufacture.
It is beautiful to see the apostle here. He does not rely on having been filled again and again with the Spirit for special testimony. He asks instead that, now as always, he may magnify Christ in his body with all boldness… Notice that he does not ask them to pray that he may be filled with the Spirit, but that he may speak the Word with boldness.
The good news he carries is not the kind people already expected.
It was not good news with a plain and obvious meaning, as in earlier days — the keeping of promises that belonged to the age or ages of this world. It was the mystery that none of this world's rulers knew, or they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
Another writer ties the word to Paul's changed sense of his own errand.
When he was free he thought of himself more as an ambassador of the Gospel, urging people to be reconciled. Now, as a prisoner, he sees himself as an ambassador of the mystery — the mystery he opened up briefly in the earlier part of the letter. It is called "the mystery of the Gospel" because the one springs out of the other and follows on from it. If we do not understand the Gospel, we cannot understand the mystery.
Boldness sounds like the least likely gap in such a man. But the message itself made enemies, and the messenger knew what he was carrying.
We learn from this that a particular spiritual gift is not enough to make Christian ministry prosper. Much more is needed. The deep distrust of himself that always stayed with this chosen vessel of God's grace was, in fact, what kept him morally safe… By the phrase "mystery of the Gospel" we are to understand the full teaching of the grace of God in the calling of the Church, which is the most striking display of that grace.
The verse leaves a standing job for ordinary believers who will never preach.
Paul wanted to keep on with this precious ministry, so he asked the saints to pray. He knew well that the enemy would be glad to silence this wonderful truth. In these last days the truth of the mystery is so little known among God's people. Should there not be constant prayer to God that this precious truth may be announced with boldness in the power of the Spirit?
- Asked — The greatest servant in the letter asks for prayer himself. That tells the weakest reader their prayers carry weight.
- Given — He asks for words as a gift. Past fillings of the Spirit do not remove the need for a fresh supply.
- Not freedom — He wants his ministry completed in prison, not his chains removed.
- The mystery — What he longs to say is the secret no ruler of this age knew: God's grace shown in the calling of the church. It grows out of the gospel, and no one grasps it without the gospel.
- Boldly — Self-mistrust, not confidence, kept him safe. Pray now what he asked then: that this truth go out with boldness in the power of the Spirit.
for which I am an ambassador [bound] with a chain, that I may be bold in it as I ought to speak.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
But in order that *ye* also may know what concerns me, how I am getting on, Tychicus, the beloved brother and faithful minister in [the] Lord, shall make all things known to you;
Ephesians ends with a courier's name. Paul hands his letter to Tychicus, and the two words he uses for him — beloved, faithful — raise the question of who is fit to carry the word of God.
Tychicus turns up again and again in Paul's story, always on the road, always carrying something.
A Christian of Asia who accompanied Paul on his last visit to Jerusalem. The apostle sent him from Rome to the Ephesians and to the Colossians. After Paul's release, he sent him to Ephesus again. Paul describes him as a beloved brother, a faithful minister and fellow-servant in the Lord. So he was the kind of man Paul could send with confidence on these missions to encourage the saints.
Tychicus did not travel alone, and this letter was not the only one leaving Rome.
Tychicus carried the letter addressed to the Colossians. It was written to correct the evils which had arisen in that church, and to warn them against the wicked doctrines being spread among them. Onesimus the slave carried that beautiful little letter addressed to his master Philemon. And at the same time when Tychicus and Onesimus left Rome, Paul handed to Tychicus the letter to the Ephesians. Never before and never after were such weighty and blessed documents entrusted to human messengers.
Commentators differ over whether the two letters travelled together.
There is a temptation to give Ephesians the same date... But I think the visit of Tychicus to Ephesus was a separate one, made at a time when Timothy was not with the apostle at Rome. Timothy is not joined with Paul in the opening address, as he likely would have been if the letter had been written at the same time as Colossians.
The words Paul uses for Tychicus are short, but they are not mere politeness.
Writing to the saints at Ephesus, he describes Tychicus as "a beloved brother and faithful minister in the Lord" (see also Colossians 4:7). That is no small verdict, above all when we remember that the Holy Spirit inspired it. And it was a remarkable mercy to the aged apostle to have, at this moment, such a servant to send on his behalf to Ephesus.
"Faithful" is not a compliment here. It is the requirement for anyone God trusts with His work.
The service of God can be entrusted only to faithful men. If they are not faithful, how can they be qualified as leaders? So Paul, like Nehemiah, surrounded himself with servants of Christ who had been tested and found faithful (1 Corinthians 4:17; Colossians 4:7, 9; 1 Timothy 1:12).
Paul expects the Ephesians to want news of him. He walked in love himself, and counted on their love in return.
Walking in full affection himself, he counted on people caring for him; walking as Paul did, this is taken for granted. Here, and in his letter to the saints at Colossae, he speaks of having sent Tychicus to declare his state — so that they might know his affairs, and how he was doing. We also, if we walk in the love of the Spirit, can always count on others being interested in our "affairs." In the world it would be pride to suppose others are anxious about our concerns. But the saint knows the love of the Spirit in the saints, and counts on it.
Tychicus brought two things to Ephesus, and they were not of the same order.
The mission of Tychicus was not only to deliver this letter safely. Through the presence of a faithful minister in the Lord, the saints at Ephesus were to enjoy a double comfort. They would hear a fuller account of Paul's affairs from the mouth of one who had just left him. They would also have his own ministry in the gospel while he stayed among them. The language of these two verses is interesting, too. It shows the broad distinction between what the apostle wrote under the direct inspiration of God, and what he might say to his brothers by word of mouth through a familiar messenger. No doubt they listened eagerly to what Tychicus might say about Paul and his fellow believers at Rome. But his letter was of another kind of interest. In reading that, they read the word of God.
- Sent. Paul entrusted his letter to a man, not just to paper. Tychicus left Rome carrying documents of unmatched weight.
- Faithful. One word qualified him, and it qualifies everyone: God trusts His work only to people tested and found faithful.
- Beloved. Paul's words are not politeness. They are a verdict from the Holy Spirit, and a mercy to an aging prisoner who needed such a servant.
- Known. Paul counted on their love. What would be pride in the world is the love of the Spirit among believers.
- Read. The news Tychicus brought was welcome. The letter he handed over was more: in reading it, they read the word of God.
whom I have sent to you for this very thing, that ye may know of our affairs and that he may encourage your hearts.
This great letter closes with something very ordinary: a man sent on a journey with news. Paul writes from prison, and he wants his readers to know how he is and to take heart.
Paul assumes, without apology, that these believers want to hear about him. Writers note that this assumption is striking. It belongs to anyone walking in the same love.
He himself walked in full affection, so he counted on people caring for him. Anyone walking as Paul did takes this for granted. Here too (vv. 21, 22), and in writing to the believers at Colosse, he says he has sent Tychicus to tell them how he is — "that you may know my affairs, and how I do." He takes their love for granted. We also, if we walk in the love of the Spirit, can always count on others caring about our "affairs." In the world it would be pride to think that others were anxious about our concerns. But the believer knows the love of the Spirit in fellow believers, and counts on it.
Turn it around. On his own, no one would dare write like this.
He counted on their love — not only in their prayers for him, but in their wanting to know how he was doing… What a contrast to the spirit of men is the mighty, gracious working of divine love in the heart! It counts on the tender concern of believers for the man who served and loved them in the Lord. Man, left to himself, would either be cold and hard, or would fear that people would call him vain, as if his affairs could interest anyone else. But Christ changes everything for the hearts of those who have received Him.
Tychicus carries a double errand. News is the method; strengthened hearts are the aim.
This is where the letter really ends. He simply adds a few words about himself and his own affairs, which he counts on the believers to care about. So Tychicus, a beloved brother and faithful minister in the Lord, will tell them everything of this kind. And he has sent him not simply so that they would know his affairs, but so that their own hearts would be encouraged.
The man doing the comforting is in chains. That reversal is the striking thing about the verse.
Then he tells them that he is sending Tychicus, "that he may encourage your hearts." Oh, if we could be like that! — in prison, yet able to comfort others… That is just like Paul: sending a cheering word from a prison in Rome to the believers at Ephesus. What cannot the Spirit of God work?
Paul does not send just anyone. The words he chooses for Tychicus carry weight, because the Holy Spirit stands behind them.
Here is a worker who gave Paul nothing but cause for gratitude. Writing to the believers at Ephesus, he describes Tychicus as "a beloved brother and faithful minister in the Lord" (see also Colossians 4:7). That is no small verdict, and we should remember that the Holy Spirit inspired it. It was a rare mercy for the aged Apostle to have such a servant to send to Ephesus on his behalf at this moment.
Other letters from Paul end with warm personal greetings. This one does not. One explanation is that the greetings travelled with the man instead of on the page.
It is beautiful to see how tender his care is for the feelings of believers. He counts on their affection. He sends a man who would help them grow in their souls, and who would also meet their anxious longing for news about his own position and circumstances… The personal messages and greetings, so beautiful in some of the letters, are missing here. Tychicus himself probably carried them.
- Love assumes love. Paul takes it for granted that they want news of him. In the world that would be vanity. In a believer it is counting on the love of the Spirit.
- Love sends news. The first errand is plain information — that they may know how he is faring.
- Love aims at hearts. The news is only the means; the stated goal is that their hearts be encouraged.
- Love travels by a person. Not a bare report but a trusted man, described as beloved and faithful, carries it.
- Love comforts from a prison. The one in chains is the one strengthening others — evidence of what the Spirit of God can work.
Peace to the brethren, and love with faith, from God [the] Father and [the] Lord Jesus Christ.
Paul has just written about armour, wrestling and a day of evil, and now he closes with peace, love and faith. Two details stand out: he asks peace for "the brothers" rather than "for you", and love comes paired with faith.
The chapter has been about conflict. This verse changes the tone. One writer counts four mentions of love at the end of the letter. The earlier ones run between people. In verse 23 love comes down from God.
Thankfully, life is NOT all battle. There is conflict, in dead earnest at times, but not always. At the close of this wonderful letter the apostle steps back from the battle, if we may say so, to enjoy the "home of the heart". That home is LOVE, and in these closing verses there are four references to love... In the first two we have love on what we might call the horizontal level. In verse 23 we come to the vertical... Perhaps most of us know that Ephesians is really a letter of love (about 14 times).
The peace Paul asks for is not something the readers must produce. One writer points to where it came from. The Lord left this peace with His own when He went away, and it belongs to a whole class of gifts that reach us one way only.
He then asks for them peace with love and faith from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. When He left His own, the Lord left them His peace. Paul wants the saints to enjoy this peace. All that we have is the sovereign gift of God, and comes to us through the Lord Jesus Christ.
The phrase "love with faith" is easy to skim past. One writer says the addition is deliberate. Owning a blessing and feeling it are two different things, and faith is what closes the gap.
It is worth noticing the significant addition of the words "with faith" in this salutation. In this way the Spirit keeps reminding us what our blessings and enjoyments really are: part of the heritage of God. Without the active exercise of faith there can be no felt share in the love of God or in His peace. Both are ours in Him who gave them to us in His Son. But to enjoy them — and so to rise above the corrupting and the discouraging influence of present things day after day — we must walk daily by faith and not by sight.
The verse names the source: God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. One writer says that naming is what gives the whole blessing its worth. He says the same of the word "incorruptness" in the next verse.
The closing salutation fits: "Peace be to the brothers, and love with faith, from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. Grace with all who love our Lord Jesus Christ in incorruptness." Without the Father and the Lord, what is anything else? Without incorruptness, even love — or what people call love — would be worthless.
Paul does not close with a note to one small group. One writer sees the greeting go to "the brothers", and then wider still to all who love the Lord Jesus Christ. That fits a letter which is hardly local.
He closes with the salutation: "Peace be to the brothers, and love with faith, from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ." Then he widens it to fit the character of this letter, which is hardly a local one: "Grace be with all who love our Lord Jesus Christ in incorruption."
The closing words gather up everything the letter has covered.
What a full and beautiful prayer to close this letter! This letter opens up all the purposes of love in God's heart towards us, the wonderful blessedness of our standing "in Christ," the walk that suits our heavenly calling, and the weapons provided for our heavenly warfare. It is doubtful that the "Amen" belongs to the original text. But it will surely be the fitting response of every believing heart.
- Source — Peace, love and faith come from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. "Without the Father and the Lord, what is anything else?"
- Gift — This peace is the peace the Lord left His own. All we have is the sovereign gift of God, and it reaches us through the Lord Jesus Christ.
- Grasp — Love comes "with faith". Owning a blessing and feeling it are not the same. Without faith at work, there is no felt share in God's love or His peace.
- Reach — The greeting goes to "the brothers", then wider still to all who love the Lord Jesus. That fits a letter which is hardly local.
- Rest — After the armour and the wrestling, life is not all battle. The letter ends in love, and every believing heart answers Amen.
Grace with all them that love our Lord Jesus Christ in incorruption.
Paul ends a long letter of deep teaching with one short wish. It asks for nothing but love for a Person. Two questions decide how we read it: what does that love mean, and why does Paul tie grace to it?
The final greeting sets no bar of maturity or insight. It names one thing only, and names it in everyone who has it.
This greeting does not view them as highly advanced or deeply taught Christians. It does not point to their exalted position, or to God's most wonderful purpose in Christ, which He has made them the subjects of. It simply speaks to them as those who "love our Lord Jesus Christ," and love Him "in sincerity." Grace, he says, be to all such.
The Greek word behind "sincerity" is the word for incorruption. Commentators note that the older translation loses something, because honesty of intention is a lower thing than what Paul asks for.
"Uncorruptness" goes far beyond "sincerity," because it brings in what is due to God and Christ, and not merely the honest character and way of the man who teaches. The related word is just as weakly represented in Ephesians 6:24; for people might be sincere enough and still spoil the "incorruption" which there qualifies the love of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Words and gestures can imitate this love. One writer sets the real thing beside two counterfeits.
Notice how Paul qualifies that love. It is to be "in sincerity": pure, genuine, uncorrupted affection for our Lord Jesus Himself. It is not the kiss of a traitorous heart. It is not the gushing words of someone who utters smooth sentiments. It is the warm beating of a soul that cherishes its object, and values it more than position or service or honour of any kind.
Why add a qualifier at all? Because corruption had already entered the group that carried the Christian name.
Only there must be purity of heart and motive. The last words of verse 24, "in sincerity," or "in incorruption," are a reminder to us. Even in the early days when Paul was writing, what was corrupt had found a way in among those who professed to be Christian. To love the Lord Jesus Christ in incorruption is the hallmark of reality, the fruit of the genuine work of God.
Nobody works this affection up by effort. It grows from what believers learn of God's love toward them.
Just as incorruptible seed produces the right fruit, so the Word which makes known divine love produces this too in the hearts of those who believe. It is written, "We love because He first loved us" (1 John 4:19). Of such people it is said, "we have come to know and to believe the love that God has for us." God expressed that love to us in Christ on Calvary's tree. He shows it toward us "in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us." So the knowledge of divine love made known in Him gives birth to that incorruptible love for our Lord Jesus Christ which marks all saints.
Why does Paul tie grace to this love? Because loving Christ keeps a believer near Him, and nearness teaches us the grace stored in Him.
Every true believer learns sooner or later that he needs Christ's grace to keep him day by day. As the Lord Himself said when He was here, "apart from me you can do nothing." Love for the Lord Jesus makes us dependent on Him, because it brings us nearer to Him. Near Him we learn the boundless stores of grace that live in Him. Those who only profess Christ pretend to love Him. But where there is no reality there can be no nearness to Christ, and no knowledge of the grace available in Him.
The same city later received a letter of rebuke, and the link between the two is hard to miss.
If only this closing word of Paul had been heeded! Then the sad rebuke of unreturned affection — "you have abandoned the love you had at first" — would never have been needed.
- Source. Unspoiled love is not something we work up. Knowing the love God showed in Christ's death produces it.
- Standard. Unspoiled love is more than sincerity. The word is incorruption, and it brings in what is due to Christ.
- Test. Unspoiled love values Christ above position, service and honour. When corruption crept in among people who carried the Christian name, this marked what was real.
- Reach. Unspoiled love is the only qualification named — not maturity, not deep teaching. The closing wish of grace covers every believer who has it.
- Result. Unspoiled love keeps us near Christ, and near Him we learn His grace. Lose it, and first love is left behind.