Ecclesiastes 2:1–26

Ecclesiastes 2:1 · Darby

I said in my heart, Come now, I will try thee with mirth, therefore enjoy pleasure. But behold, this also is vanity.

Solomon turns his search inward. He tells his own heart to enjoy itself, and the verdict lands in the same breath as the test — so why could a king able to buy any pleasure not buy happiness?

The Voice of a Man Under the Sun

One phrase runs through the whole book: under the sun. One word keeps returning with it: vanity.

The word "vanity" means that which soon vanishes, nothingness. It is often joined to "vexation of spirit" — literally, pursuit of the wind. Ecclesiastes is occupied with earthly things, with what man does apart from God — that is, the natural man. The book describes the things under the sun. It shows that everything man does, his pursuits, his labours, whatever he undertakes and all that goes with it, is nothing but vanity and a chasing after wind. It is always unsatisfying and full of sorrow and perplexity. The writer makes it clear that in all his searching he does not depend on divine revelation, on what is above the sun. He reaches his results by the light nature gives. His resources are within himself. The phrase "I communed with my own heart" occurs seven times in the book and confirms this.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The verse opens with a man talking to himself, and that matters for how we read it:

The whole passage is what Solomon tells us he "said in his heart" at a certain time. It is not divine revelation, but human doubt: the questioning of man's mind while speculating about the mystery of existence.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

"I Will Test You" — the Experiment Explained

"I will test you with pleasure" is Solomon speaking to his own heart. Here is what he then tried.

He said in his heart, "Come now, I will test you" — that is, I will try now to satisfy you, that is, myself, my heart. He said to himself, "enjoy yourself." He laughed and had mirth; he tried wine, laid hold on folly. Then he made great works. He built houses, planted vineyards, and laid out beautiful gardens with fruit trees and all kinds of shrubbery. They had pools of water, springs and waterfalls — all so pleasing to the eye. To all this he added servants and maidens, with great possessions.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Test Nobody Else Could Run

Most people only sample the world's pleasures. Solomon had the means to exhaust them, and he wrote down what he found.

Thank God, before Solomon ended his career his eyes were opened. He was led to write this striking book, and in it he records the results of the experiment. He was not inspired in doing what he did, but he was certainly inspired to put on record the result of the experiment. Listen to what he says: I have investigated on a grand scale, on a scale others can never touch. Others might have one per cent of it. I have had the whole hundred per cent. The verdict is, there is not a bit of profit in it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Laughter Weighed and Found Mad

The next verse pronounces on the very thing verse 1 commanded. The judgment is blunt, and it is aimed at a world that still runs the same experiment.

In Ecclesiastes Solomon tells us he went in for mirth and pleasure. People are pleasure-mad nowadays, but they do not look happy. Solomon says of such laughter, "It is mad" — so it is. "For as the crackling of thorns under a pot, so is the laughter of the fools." The crackling of thorns does not last long, and the pleasures of sin last only a season. How foolish to forget God, the soul, eternity.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

What the Experiment Cost Him

The experiment cost Solomon more than money.

But then he said, I am going "to know madness and folly." If there is any pleasure in a thing, I am in for it. He turned to wine — a dangerous thing. He married wives. He carried out great works. He gathered riches. He not only sipped but drank deeply of every sparkling cup. He tried every imaginable pleasure. He not only ruined his testimony, but very largely wrecked his kingdom. In all this self-gratification he heaped up every delightful thing and made everything serve himself. His aim was to be able to say that he had become great.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why the Heart Stayed Empty

So why did none of it satisfy him?

Solomon says that all the rivers run into the sea, yet the sea is not full. The sea is the human heart. Send every river of earthly pleasure into those discontented hearts. They would still stay unfilled and unsatisfied. Men hunt for satisfaction where it never can be found. An iceberg yields no heat, salt no sweetness, and wine cannot be pressed from turnips. Man's heart was made for God, and only God, in Christ, can fill and satisfy it.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Speaker. The verse records a man talking to his own heart, working from his own resources, not passing on a message from God.

- Search. "I will test you with pleasure" means he set out to satisfy himself. He had the wealth, wisdom and throne to run the test in full.

- Verdict. One man tried the whole hundred per cent and filed the report: there is not a bit of profit in it.

- Cost. The search ruined his testimony and wrecked much of his kingdom — all so he could say he had become great.

- Answer. Every river of earthly pleasure leaves the human heart empty. That heart was made for God, and only God, in Christ, fills it.

Ecclesiastes 2:2 · Darby

I said of laughter, Madness! and of mirth, What availeth it?

Solomon set out to test happiness with every advantage a king could command. His verdict on laughter and his blunt question about pleasure are the report of that experiment.

The experiment behind the verdict

The book records a trial. Solomon kept his wisdom while he ran it, so he could judge what he found:

This is the experience of a man who keeps his wisdom, so that he can judge everything. He tries everything under the sun that might be thought able to make men happy. He enjoys everything the human mind can imagine as a means of joy. The result of this trial was the discovery that all is vanity and frustration of spirit. Every effort to be happy by owning the earth, whatever the way, ends in nothing. There is a worm eating at the root. The greater the capacity for enjoyment, the deeper and wider the disappointment and frustration of spirit.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Talking to his own heart

In "I will test you," Solomon is talking to his own heart. What follows runs through everything a fallen nature reaches for:

He experimented, so to speak, with what belongs to the natural man, a fallen nature. That nature holds three things: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes and the pride of life. We can trace these three things in the opening verses. The lust of the flesh in verses 1-3; the lust of the eyes in verses 4-6, and the pride of life in verses 7-8. He said in his heart, "Come now, I will test you": that is, I will try now to satisfy you, that is myself, my heart. He said to himself, "enjoy pleasure." He laughed and had mirth; he tried wine, laid hold on folly.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why laughter gets called "mad"

The chase after pleasure has not changed, and neither has the verdict on it:

In Ecclesiastes Solomon tells us he went in for mirth and pleasure. People are pleasure mad nowadays, but they do not look happy. Solomon says of such laughter, "It is MAD," so it is. "As the crackling of thorns under a pot, so is the laughter of the fools." Thorns do not crackle for long, and the pleasures of sin last only for a season. How foolish to forget God, the soul, eternity.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

"What use is it?"

The answer is nothing, and the reason is the size of the human heart:

The heart of man is too large for this world to fill. Its capacities are too vast for everything under the heavens to satisfy… But suppose a man reached every object he desired and had everything — what would he gain? Only a deeper sense that all is vanity, that earthly good has no power to fill the aching emptiness within. All worldly pleasures, amusements, indulgences and gratifications leave the soul more thirsty than ever: they cannot satisfy. Excitement is the right name for worldly pleasures — take that away, and they would prove a most burdensome task.

Modernised from Andrew MillerOriginal wording

A witness worth believing

This verdict does not come from a man who missed out. He had his fill, and he kept his head while he did:

Such was the wide range of pleasures, intellectual and sensual, that he explored. He held back no joy. Yet while he entered so keenly into all that he describes, he tells us his wisdom remained with him. So he was well able to judge what all this was worth, from his own experience and from the wisdom that never left him. Would not such a man be satisfied with what this life offered? If others less favoured were disappointed, he at least had his fill of everything he desired.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

What the laughter was covering

If pleasure cannot deliver, what is it standing in for?

It is truly a dreary world of grief, where man seeks pleasure and mirth in place of happiness. That happiness cannot exist where the conscience is not purged in a divine way, and where the heart does not have Christ before it — God's object, and ours too.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- The test. Solomon tried everything that might make a man happy, and kept his wisdom so he could judge the results.

- The tester. He was talking to his own heart: "I will try to satisfy you." He worked through the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes and the pride of life.

- The verdict. Laughter is "mad" because it forgets God, the soul and eternity. It burns out like thorns crackling under a pot.

- The reason. The heart is too large for this world to fill. Pleasure leaves the soul thirstier, and take away the excitement and only the burden remains.

- The alternative. Mirth stands in for a happiness that cannot exist without a conscience purged in a divine way and Christ before the heart.

Ecclesiastes 2:3 · Darby

I searched in my heart how to cherish my flesh with wine, while practising my heart with wisdom; and how to lay hold on folly, till I should see what was that good for the children of men which they should do under the heavens all the days of their life.

Solomon ran an experiment on himself. He cheered himself with wine and reached for folly, yet kept his wisdom awake to judge the result. He was not after amusement. He wanted an answer: what is really worth doing in a short human life?

The question the experiment was meant to answer

This search drives the whole book. It is fenced in by one phrase — "under the sun" — and it is a man's reasoning, not God's final word.

The first two or three verses give the subject of this book. "Vanity of vanities, says the Preacher, vanity of vanities! All is vanity. What does man gain by all the toil at which he toils under the sun?" This expression "under the sun" occurs no less than twenty-eight times in the twelve chapters, and gives the character of the book. It describes life "in Adam," and seeks an answer to the questions, What is best for man? how should he spend his life to be happy on earth? The writer speaks as a human philosopher in his wanderings. Sometimes he gets near the truth, at other times he is far from it. So some passages state man's false conclusions. The last two verses answer the searchings of Ecclesiastes 1:13 and 2:3.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Wisdom kept as the judge

One clause in the middle changes everything: his heart still guided him with wisdom. He kept a clear head while he tasted. So his verdict carries weight. Gaebelein quotes another writer's summary of the method and its result:

This is the experience of a man who keeps his wisdom, so that he can judge everything. He tries out everything under the sun that people might think could make them happy… The effect of this trial was the discovery that all is vanity and vexation of spirit; that every effort to be happy in possessing the earth, in whatever way it may be, ends in nothing. There is a worm eating at the root. The greater a man's capacity to enjoy, the deeper and wider his disappointment and grief of spirit.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What the wine stands for

Wine comes first on the list, and his own mother had already warned him against it. One writer reads the wine as standing for far more than a drink:

Did Solomon not know this without having to learn it by experience? Yet here again he ignored his mother's advice, as Ecclesiastes 2:3 tells us, and learned by painful experience that she was right… Wine stands for anything that only excites or stimulates for a time. Pleasure can intoxicate a man, as it did Solomon for a while. So can personal pride, money-making, and the many other things that stir the desires of the flesh. They can affect his thoughts so much that sound, sober judgment fails for a time.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Laying hold on folly

The other half of the plan was to take hold of folly on purpose — to taste what is wrong and find out what it is like. People still try it:

We have known young Christians to go secretly to dances, theatres and worse places, to gain experience. How terrible! To eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and EVIL only brought evil results, and it will ever do so. Whoever goes in for sin (for just this once, not much harm in it, don't mean to practise it) does so at his or her peril. On these very lines Solomon in his happier days asks, "Can a man carry fire next to his chest and his clothes not be burned?"

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

What the experiment cost him

This decision was carried through to the end, and Solomon was not the only one who paid for it.

But then he said, I am going "to know madness and folly." If there is any pleasure in a thing, I am in for it. He turned to wine — a dangerous thing. He married wives. He built great works. He gathered riches. He did not just sip; he drank deeply from every sparkling cup. He tried every imaginable pleasure. He ruined his testimony, and wrecked much of his kingdom too. All this self-pleasing, all this piling up of every delightful thing, all this making everything serve himself — his aim was to be able to say, "So I was great."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Where the search finally lands

He held nothing back, and still came up empty. The question of verse 3 stays open. No experiment under the sun can answer it.

Thank God! there is One who can still the hunger and thirst of the soul, who graciously invites, "If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Search. The verse asks what is good for a person to do in a short life. Only the book's closing words answer it.

- Sober. Solomon kept his wisdom as judge while he drank. No one can dismiss his verdict as the report of a clouded mind.

- Substitute. Wine stands for whatever excites for the moment — pleasure, pride, money-making. It clouds sound judgment while it lasts.

- Snare. Sampling folly to gain experience only brings evil results. Anyone who tries sin "just once" is handling fire.

- Satisfied. The experiment ran to the full and paid nothing. Only the One who invites the thirsty to come and drink can still that thirst.

Ecclesiastes 2:4 · Darby

I made me great works; I builded me houses; I planted me vineyards;

In Ecclesiastes 2 the king runs an experiment. He tries, one by one, everything life offers, and here he turns from pleasure to building — with the question whether great work can fill a human heart.

A New Attempt After Pleasure Failed

Solomon had already tried pleasure, and it came to nothing. The building projects are the next stage in the same search.

So he tries mirth next, a natural relief for those who are bitter in soul, as we hear in Proverbs 31. It was all in vain, and the feeling of disappointment returns (Ecclesiastes 2:1-3). Might not activity in great works succeed better? Solomon tried this and carried it out with extraordinary effort and splendour. But he looked back over all the work he did and the toil he toiled, and he could rest in none of it. It was all vanity and a striving after wind, with no profit under the sun.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Building Was Feeding

The houses, vineyards and gardens were not random luxuries. One writer sorts the opening verses by the appetites of fallen human nature. Verses 4-6 belong to one of them.

Here we find first of all the king's personal experience. He experimented, so to speak, with what belongs to the natural man, a fallen nature. That nature holds three things: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes and the pride of life. We can trace these three things in the opening verses. The lust of the flesh in verses 1-3; the lust of the eyes in verses 4-6, and the pride of life in verses 7-8… Then he made great works, built houses and planted vineyards. He laid out beautiful gardens with fruit trees and all kinds of shrubs, with pools of water, springs and waterfalls. It was all so pleasing to the eye — the lust of the eyes.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Small Word That Gives It Away

Solomon built for himself. Older translations repeat the word "me" in each line, and one writer makes that pronoun the key to the passage.

The result was that Solomon became extremely selfish. This too comes out in Ecclesiastes 2. Read the passage again, and notice how he puts it: "I made me… I built me… I planted me… I got me… I gathered me… So I was great." His life became one of self-gratification. It went so far that he might have said, "For me to live is — SELF." And the Apostle Paul? Well, in Philippians again we have his word, "For to me to live is — CHRIST" (Phil. 1:21). There is no greater contrast than a life lived for self and a life lived for Christ.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The same writer counts the pronoun and files the chapter alongside others in Scripture:

Ecclesiastes 2 is Solomon's "I" chapter: that personal pronoun occurs 16 times in the first 9 verses: a true chapter of the self-gratified "I."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why the Houses and Vineyards Could Not Hold Him

The failure was not in the quality of the work. It lay in what Solomon was asking the work to do for him.

In Ecclesiastes, Solomon says, "There is no good thing under the sun"; "All is vanity and a striving after wind." Why so? To him, self was seeking its own satisfaction. Here, then, was no rest, no peace; it could not be otherwise. No human object could satisfy an immortal soul, nor could a dying man get rest in what he was to die out of. Yet, when thinking of himself, it was all I, I, I — I did it, and I found it vanity… As someone has said, in Ecclesiastes the heart was too great for the object. In the Song of Songs the object is too great for the heart.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Cost Others Paid

The building had to be paid for, and the nation paid the bill.

Solomon tells us in his own words of the many public works he took an interest in. Houses, vineyards, gardens, orchards, and so on — never had the nation seen the like! … But there was no satisfaction for his heart… He built new cities and rebuilt others (1 Kings 9:17-19). But all this meant heavy taxation. In time the people groaned under the burden. Solomon groaned with a disappointed heart.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

A man with no interest in God could say the same words. The achievement settles nothing about him:

Solomon says in Ecclesiastes 2:4: "I made great works. I built houses and planted vineyards for myself." Ahab could have said the same. But what blessing did he get out of it all?

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Experiment Written Down for Us

Solomon's failure was not wasted. He lived to publish the results, so that nobody else needs to repeat the trial.

Thank God, before Solomon ended his career his eyes were opened and he was led to write this striking book in which he puts on record the results of the experiment… Listen to what he says: I have investigated on a grand scale — on a scale that others can never touch — others might have one per cent of it — I have had the whole hundred per cent, and the verdict is, there is not a bit of profit in it. There is "no profit under the sun."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

And the hunger the gardens could not feed has an answer elsewhere:

Thank God! there is One who can still the hunger and thirst of the soul. He graciously invites, "If anyone thirsts, let him come to Me and drink."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- The attempt — Pleasure had already failed. So Solomon asked whether great work would do better. He built with unmatched splendour and could rest in none of it.

- The appetite — The houses, vineyards and gardens fed the lust of the eyes. They were part of an experiment run on fallen human nature.

- The giveaway — "I made me… I built me… I planted me": the repeated pronoun marks a life that could say, "For me to live is self."

- The reason — No human object can satisfy an immortal soul. No dying man finds rest in what he must die out of. The heart was too great for the object.

- The result — The people groaned under the taxes. Solomon groaned with disappointment: "no profit under the sun." The thirst he could not fill is met in the One who invites the thirsty to come and drink.

Ecclesiastes 2:5 · Darby

I made me gardens and parks, and I planted trees in them of every kind of fruit;

Solomon's building programme reaches its high point here. A king with unlimited money and skill set out to make himself a paradise on earth. This book records what he found when he looked at it.

The word behind "orchards"

The Hebrew word translated "orchards" or "parks" is rare, and it is the ancestor of a word every reader knows. One writer traces it carefully:

"Paradise" is an Eastern word for a "park" or "pleasure-grounds." The Hebrew word pardes appears only in Nehemiah 2:8, Ecclesiastes 2:5 and Song of Songs 4:13. It is translated there once as "forest" and twice as "orchard." Hebrew does not use it for the garden of Eden; there the ordinary word for "garden," gan, appears. The Greek translation of the Old Testament, however, gives paradeisos (paradise) here. That is almost always the word it uses for the Garden of Eden, or of God. The New Testament use comes from that Greek version, but with a higher meaning: "today you will be with me in paradise" (Luke 23:43), and "the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God" (Revelation 2:7).

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

So Solomon was making himself a paradise: Eden planted again by his own hand.

What the planting was really for

The gardens were not idle landscaping. They belong to a deliberate experiment, and one writer sorts the whole passage into three appetites:

Here we find first of all the king's personal experience. He experimented, so to speak, with what belongs to the natural man, a fallen nature. That nature holds three things: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes and the pride of life. We can trace these three things in the opening verses. The lust of the flesh is in verses 1-3. The lust of the eyes is in verses 4-6. The pride of life is in verses 7-8. … Then he made great works, built houses, planted vineyards, laid out beautiful gardens with fruit trees, all kinds of shrubbery, with pools of water, springs and waterfalls — all so pleasing to the eye — the lust of the eyes.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why beauty could not fix it

There is nothing wrong with a garden. The tragedy is that the man walking in it is no longer what he was made to be:

As God first created him, man was meant to find pure delight on earth. He had a nature able to enjoy, a mind able to learn and grow, and a body able to work. Everything around him would have given him pleasure, or the chance to develop all his powers. Is that the case now? … Man is like a beautiful ruin. Traces of exquisite workmanship remain here and there, and by them we can contrast the architect's clear design with the building's present state. So in man's feelings and powers we can see what he was first capable of, though we must admit he is a wreck.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The verdict on the great works

Solomon poured skill, wealth and effort into these projects. The result matched everything else he had tried:

Might not activity in great works succeed better? Solomon tried this and carried it out with extraordinary care and splendour. But he looked back over all the work he did and the toil he toiled, and he could rest in none of it. The whole was vanity and a striving after wind, and no profit under the sun.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Solomon's failure went on record on purpose, so nobody has to repeat it:

He was not inspired in doing what he did, but he was certainly inspired to put the result of the experiment on record. Listen to what he says: I have investigated on a grand scale — on a scale that others can never touch. Others might have one per cent of it. I have had the whole hundred per cent, and the verdict is, there is not a bit of profit in it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Where the heart is actually filled

If gardens, pools and fruit trees left the wisest man empty, the problem is not the quantity of the supply but the size of the container:

Solomon says, "All streams run to the sea, but the sea is not full" (Ecclesiastes 1:7). The sea is the human heart. Pour every river of earthly pleasure into those discontented hearts, and they would still remain unfilled and unsatisfied. Men hunt for satisfaction where it never can be found. An iceberg yields no heat, salt no sweetness, and wine cannot be pressed from turnips. Man's heart was made for God, and only God, in Christ, can fill and satisfy it.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The same writer names the One who meets that need:

Thank God! There is One who can still the hunger and thirst of the soul. He graciously invites, "If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Plant. Solomon's gardens and fruit trees were one stage of a planned experiment in what a fallen nature wants — here, "the lust of the eyes."

- Paradise. The word for "parks" is pardes, the root of "paradise". Solomon was building his own Eden, but that name belongs to the paradise of God.

- Ruin. God made man to find pure delight on earth. Man is now a beautiful ruin, and no landscaping repairs a wreck.

- Proof. He had a hundred per cent of what most people get one per cent of. Looking back, he could rest in none of it — no profit under the sun.

- Rest. Every river of earthly pleasure leaves the heart unfilled. God made it for Himself, and Christ still invites the thirsty to come and drink.

Ecclesiastes 2:6 · Darby

I made me ponds of water, to water therewith the wood, where the trees are reared.

Solomon dug reservoirs and piped the water to a whole wood of young trees. The verse raises a question every generation asks again: can beautiful surroundings ever satisfy the heart?

The pronoun that runs through the chapter

One word keeps returning through these verses. Commentators have counted it.

Ecclesiastes 2 is Solomon's "I" chapter: that personal pronoun occurs 16 times in the first 9 verses — a true chapter of the self-gratified "I."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Built for the eye

Gaebelein sorts these verses by the appetite they feed. The pools and the wood they watered were made to please the eye.

He experimented with what belongs to the natural man, a fallen nature. In that nature there are three things: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life. The lust of the flesh is in verses 1-3. The lust of the eyes is in verses 4-6. The pride of life is in verses 7-8… Then he made great works, built houses, planted vineyards, laid out beautiful gardens with fruit trees and all kinds of shrubbery, with pools of water, springs and waterfalls — all so pleasing to the eye.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Big projects as a cure for emptiness

Wine and laughter had already failed him. So he changed method: if pleasure could not fill him, work might. The pools are part of that second attempt.

Might not activity in great works succeed better? Solomon tried this and carried it out with extraordinary diligence and splendour. But when he looked back over all the work he had done and all the toil it cost him, he could rest in none of it. The whole thing was vanity and frustration of spirit, with no profit under the sun.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Watering a garden of his own making

Mawson traces this instinct back further. The first man left God's garden, and people have been building their own ever since.

He brought out of that earthly paradise a craving for beautiful surroundings, and he has worked without stopping to get them. But if God's garden did not satisfy him, his own certainly cannot. And in his own garden there is always a tomb to mock his best efforts.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Someone else will walk in that forest

Verse 6 waters trees that are still growing. That is planting for a future the planter may not live to see.

The misery of it is just this. A man has laboured for years, and he naturally expects to enjoy what he, not others, has piled up. But death comes in and takes him away, so he leaves all the fruit of his labour for another to enjoy.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The King still to come

This failure is not one man's bad luck. Kelly sets Solomon's experiment against the world before sin, and against the One still to come.

It was not like this before sin entered the world. On the contrary, God saw everything that He had made, and it was very good. Once sin was there, God made the evil felt. The result is laid bare here by the clearest picture of the One who will yet come in power, glory and righteousness, and bring the days of heaven on the earth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The one thing that is not vanity

The book is not just a list of failed experiments. It leaves one door open.

In it I see one way, but one only, open to us as an escape from the condition and from the sense of a universal vanity. We are "shut up" to it… Faith in Jesus, says the apostle, is the one and only outlet from a state of condemnation. Living to Jesus, says the Book of Ecclesiastes, is the one and only outlet from a state of vanity.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The man with the reservoirs was still thirsty. Gaebelein points to the only water that ends that thirst.

Thank God, there is One who can still the hunger and thirst of the soul. He kindly invites, "If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink."

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- "I made myself" — "I" appears sixteen times in the first nine verses of this chapter. The real project is the self; the landscape is only the material.

- The eye — verses 4-6 feed the lust of the eyes: gardens, shrubs, pools and waterfalls, all pleasing to look at.

- The labour — when pleasure failed, Solomon turned to great works. He built with splendour and could rest in none of it.

- The heir — the young trees grow, but death takes the planter. The fruit of his labour goes to someone who never worked for it.

- The thirst — if God's garden did not satisfy man, his own garden cannot, and it always has a tomb in it. The one way out is living to Jesus, who invites the thirsty to come and drink.

Ecclesiastes 2:7 · Darby

I acquired servants and maidens, and had servants born in my house; also I had great possessions of herds and flocks, above all that had been in Jerusalem before me.

Solomon's list of possessions keeps growing: servants, herds, flocks. Why was a king piling all this up? And did any of it satisfy him?

Why the list is so long

Solomon's throne gave him the means to test what most people can only guess at.

Solomon was lifted high, so that from his position and resources he could inspect and test the vanity of all human conditions. Everything that business or pleasure could provide for him was within his reach. So was everything that wealth, position, or learning commanded. And he challenged it all to say what it was worth.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Where this verse falls in the search

One writer traces a pattern through the opening verses of the chapter. The servants and possessions come at one stage of it.

He experimented, so to speak, with what belongs to the natural man, a fallen nature. That nature holds three things: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes and the pride of life. We can trace these three things in the opening verses. The lust of the flesh comes in verses 1-3. The lust of the eyes in verses 4-6. The pride of life in verses 7-8… To all this he added servants and maidens, with great possessions.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What the servants cost the nation

Where did all these servants come from, and who paid for them?

Solomon pressed the Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, and others left in the land into service (1 Kings 9:20). He built new cities and rebuilt others (1 Kings 9:17-19). But all this meant heavy taxation. In time the people groaned under the burden, while Solomon groaned with heart disappointment. The load of taxation probably made the people ask Rehoboam to make their service less harsh and their yoke lighter (1 Kings 12:4). Men will not complain like that when the Lord reigns in Zion.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Heaping things up for self

Behind the herds and flocks stands the man. One writer names the aim of the whole collection.

He turned to wine — a dangerous thing. He married wives. He carried out great works. He gathered riches. He did not only sip; he drank deeply from every sparkling cup. He tried every pleasure he could imagine. He not only ruined his testimony; he wrecked much of his kingdom too. He heaped up every delightful thing for himself and made everything serve himself. His aim in all this self-gratification was to be able to say, "So I was great."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Multiplying against instruction

God had set limits for Israel's kings. The same writer shows what ignoring them cost.

He multiplied horses and wives and riches. He did the three things the king was told not to do, and did them openly and without shame. All this building up of self rests on one idea: that the way to live is to get everything possible for your own pleasure. The consequence is solemn. It traps you in disobedience, and you forfeit the support of God. Solomon did not act in ignorance of God's Word. It was simply staring him in the face, which made what he did all the more shocking.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The verdict on the whole section

Solomon put real energy and skill into these works. Here is how it ended.

Might activity in great works do better? Solomon attempted this and carried it out with extraordinary diligence and splendour. But then he reviewed all the work he had done and all the toil it had cost him. He could rest in none of it. The whole thing was vanity, a chasing after the wind, with nothing to be gained under the sun (verses 4-11).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why nothing acquired could fill him

Why could none of it satisfy him?

To him, self was seeking its own satisfaction. So here was no rest, no peace; it could not be otherwise. No human object could satisfy an immortal soul, and a dying man could get no rest in something he was going to die out of. When he thought of himself, it was all I, I, I — I did it, and I found it vanity. But in the Song of Songs we see all his blessedness, because there he speaks of Christ being everything to him. As someone has said: in Ecclesiastes the heart was too great for the object; in the Song the object is too great for the heart.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Scale. Solomon had resources no ordinary person has. His verdict on wealth is tested, not guessed.

- Possession. The servants, herds and flocks mark the pride-of-life stage of his search. He gathered them all so he could say, "So I was great."

- Cost. Forced labour and heavy taxes paid for the splendour. The people groaned under the burden while the king groaned with disappointment.

- Consequence. Solomon did the very things God told Israel's kings not to do. Building up self traps a man in disobedience and forfeits God's support.

- Verdict. He looked over it all and could rest in none of it. An immortal soul cannot be filled by what a dying man must leave behind. The heart was too great for the object.

Ecclesiastes 2:8 · Darby

I gathered me also silver and gold, and the peculiar treasure of kings and of the provinces; I got me men-singers and women-singers, and the delights of the children of men, a wife and concubines.

Solomon's list of possessions peaks here: silver and gold, tribute from kings and provinces, trained singers, and more. Two questions follow. What does the last phrase describe? And did a man who could buy anything end up owning anything worth having?

The word behind "treasure"

Older versions call this "the peculiar treasure." The term is not a general word for wealth. It marks a possession valued above all others.

Ecclesiastes 2:8 is the one exception, where Solomon gathers "the peculiar treasure of kings." Everywhere else, in the Old Testament and in the New Testament, these expressions refer to what God's people are to Him: Exodus 19:5; Deuteronomy 14:2; Psalm 135:4; Titus 2:14. The terms describe a possession of specially choice value.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Solomon takes the word Scripture uses for God's own people and puts it on his treasury.

Pride of life

One writer traces three appetites of the fallen nature through the chapter. This verse falls in the last of them.

In that fallen nature there are three things: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes and the pride of life. We can trace all three in the opening verses. The lust of the flesh comes in verses 1-3, the lust of the eyes in verses 4-6, and the pride of life in verses 7-8… He gathered silver and gold and treasures that only kings could get. These were gifts, probably from other rulers, perhaps the ones the Queen of Sheba brought. He also paid attention to music, had men singers, women singers, and an orchestra. Then, self-satisfied, he leans back and says, "So I was great."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Commentators differ over the closing words. The ESV reads them as "many concubines, the delight of the sons of man." One writer gives both options: music, or many wives.

…the delights of the sons of men, that is, musical instruments of all sorts [or, as it may also be translated, and perhaps more correctly, "a wife and wives," that is, many wives].

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

A law he knew and ignored

If that second reading stands, this verse shows Solomon breaking the rules written for Israel's kings.

He multiplied horses and wives and riches. He openly did the three things the king was told not to do. All this self-glorifying rests on the idea that the way to live is to get everything you can for your own pleasure. The result is solemn. You are trapped into disobedience and you lose the support of God. Solomon did not act in ignorance of God's Word. It was staring him in the face, so what he did was outrageous.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Everything aimed at himself

Read the surrounding verses aloud and one small word keeps returning. The verbs change; the object never does.

The result was that Solomon became very selfish. This too comes out clearly in Ecclesiastes 2. Read the passage again, and note how he puts it: "I made me… I built me… I planted me… I got me… I gathered me… So I was great." His life became one of self-gratification. He might almost have said, "For me to live is — SELF." And the Apostle Paul? In Philippians we have his word, "For to me to live is — CHRIST" (Philippians 1:21). Nothing contrasts more sharply than a life lived for self and a life lived for Christ.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The verdict on the whole collection

Solomon did not guess at the results. He ran the trial with resources no one else has ever had.

Thank God, before Solomon ended his career his eyes were opened. He was led to write this striking book, which records the results of the experiment. God did not inspire him in doing what he did, but He did inspire him to record the result. Listen to what he says: I have investigated on a grand scale, a scale that others can never touch. Others might have one per cent of it; I have had the whole hundred per cent. The verdict is that there is not a bit of profit in it. There is "no profit under the sun."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The failure was not in the quality of what he gathered. It was in what a human heart is built to hold.

You could pour every river of earthly pleasure into discontented human hearts, and they would still be empty and unsatisfied. Men hunt for satisfaction where it never can be found. An iceberg yields no heat, salt no sweetness, and wine cannot be pressed from turnips. Man's heart was made for God, and only God, in Christ, can fill and satisfy it. Riches, fame, pleasure, all fail to bring contentment to the heart.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Gathered — the word for "treasure" is the one Scripture keeps for God's own prized people. Solomon used it for his vaults.

- Grand — singers and royal tribute mark the peak of the pride of life. The closing phrase means either music or many wives.

- Forbidden — horses, wives and riches were the three things Israel's king was told not to multiply. Solomon knew the text.

- Self — every line runs "I made me… I got me," and the whole life adds up to "So I was great."

- Empty — the man who had one hundred per cent of what money can buy returned the verdict "no profit." Only God fills a heart made for God.

Ecclesiastes 2:9 · Darby

And I became great, and increased more than all that had been before me in Jerusalem also my wisdom remained with me.

Solomon reaches the peak of his experiment here. He rises above everyone before him in Jerusalem, and his wisdom stays with him the whole way. So the verse raises a sharp question. If a man can have everything and still think clearly, what does he make of it?

The aim behind the experiment

Solomon's boast in this verse is not a stray remark. One writer reads it as the goal behind all the building, buying and collecting.

So much for Solomon's wisdom. But then he said, I am going "to know madness and folly." If there is any pleasure in a thing, I am in for it. He turned to wine — a dangerous thing. He married wives. He carried out great works. He gathered riches. He did not only sip; he drank deeply of every sparkling cup. He tried every imaginable pleasure. He not only ruined his testimony; he wrecked much of his kingdom. All this self-indulgence, all this piling up of every delightful thing, made everything serve himself. His aim was to be able to say, "So I became great."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Wisdom that never left him

The second half of the verse matters as much as the first. His judgment stayed sharp the whole way through. So no one can write off his verdict as the complaint of a man who lost his head.

Such was the wide range of pleasures, intellectual and physical, that he explored. He held back no joy from himself. Yet even while he threw himself into all that he describes, he tells us his wisdom remained with him. So he was fully able to judge what all this was worth. He had lived it, and his wisdom never left him. Would not such a man be satisfied with what this life could give? If others less favoured were disappointed, he at least had his fill of everything he desired.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Three appetites, one man

The list running up to this verse is not random. One commentator traces a pattern through it. It ends at the self-satisfied pause this verse records.

Here we find first of all the king's personal experience. He experimented, so to speak, with what belongs to the natural man, a fallen nature. In that nature are found three things: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes and the pride of life. We can trace these three things in the opening verses… Then he made great works. He built houses, planted vineyards, and laid out beautiful gardens with fruit trees and all kinds of shrubbery. He added pools of water, springs and waterfalls — all so pleasing to the eye — the lust of the eyes. To all this he added male and female servants, with great possessions… Then he leans back, self-satisfied, and says, "So I became great and surpassed all who were before me in Jerusalem. Also my wisdom remained with me."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why this man's verdict carries weight

If anyone had grounds to escape the sense of emptiness, it was this king. That is why his report is worth reading.

What gives special point to it is the personal position of the Preacher. Could anyone look at man as he is on the earth and be free from the sense of misery? If anyone could, we would have expected it to be king Solomon. It is his appraisal in the Spirit which lies before us, so that faith might profit by all he tells. It does not come from any lack of power, interest, or research, or from any lack of ability or resources… The sense of its emptiness, and the sorrow over its evil, ran all the deeper in the man who could best appreciate it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Great — or great gain

Solomon's greatness came from what he gathered. One writer names a different gain, and it comes from a life lived before God.

Now godliness means this: being conscious of God, living under the eye of God, having God as the trust and the glory of our hearts. Godliness, with the contentment that flows from it, is great gain.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Solomon's glory did not last. Even at its height it pointed beyond itself.

Solomon's own folly soon put out the blaze of his glory. Even so, it already reminds us that "a greater than Solomon" is in the mind and purpose of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Aim — Solomon made everything he built, bought and gathered serve himself, so that he could say, "So I became great."

- Advantage — His wisdom stayed with him the whole way, so he could judge what it was all worth.

- Appetite — The list traces three appetites: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes and the pride of life. It ends with a man leaning back, self-satisfied.

- Verdict — If anyone could have escaped the sense of emptiness, it was this king. Instead the man best able to appreciate it all felt it most deeply.

- Alternative — Solomon's greatness rested on what he gathered. Godliness with contentment, lived under the eye of God, is great gain. It points on to the One greater than Solomon.

Ecclesiastes 2:10 · Darby

And whatsoever mine eyes desired I kept not from them I withheld not my heart from any joy; for my heart rejoiced in all my labour, and this was my portion from all my labour.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Ecclesiastes 2:11 · Darby

Then I looked on all the works that my hands had wrought, and on the labour that it had cost me to do [them]; and behold, all was vanity and pursuit of the wind, and there was no profit under the sun.

Solomon stops building and starts counting. The ledger comes back empty. It raises a sharp question. If the man who could buy anything gained nothing, what are the rest of us hoping to find?

The Moment of Review

The verse is a backward glance. The writers here quote an older translation: where the ESV has "a striving after wind" and "nothing to be gained," it reads "vexation of spirit" and "no profit." One writer notices that the joy Solomon described a line earlier is already in the past tense.

Notice that when Solomon wrote about his rejoicing he used the past tense. He did not say, "my heart rejoices," but, "my heart rejoiced." Then we look at the very next verse, and we find him saying, "All was vanity and vexation of spirit, and there was no profit under the sun." His disillusionment was complete.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Test Run at Full Scale

This is not the complaint of a man who never got his chance. Solomon ran the test with resources no reader will match, and he published the findings himself.

Thank God, before Solomon ended his career God opened his eyes and led him to write this striking book. In it he puts on record the results of the experiment. Listen to what he says: I have investigated on a grand scale — on a scale that others can never touch. Others might have one per cent of it. I have had the whole hundred per cent, and the verdict is: there is not a bit of profit in it. There is "no profit under the sun."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the Great Works Were Chasing

The pleasures and building projects earlier in the chapter fall into a pattern. One writer sorts them into three appetites of fallen human nature.

Here we find first of all the king's personal experience. He experimented, so to speak, with what belongs to the natural man — a fallen nature. That nature holds three things: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes and the pride of life. We can trace these three things in the opening verses. The lust of the flesh in verses 1-3; the lust of the eyes in verses 4-6, and the pride of life in verses 7-8.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why None of It Paid

The failure was structural, not accidental. The pronouns in the chapter give it away — the whole survey circles back on the man who made it.

In Ecclesiastes, Solomon says, "There is no good thing under the sun"; "All is vanity and vexation of spirit." Why so? To him, self was seeking its own satisfaction. Here, then, was no rest, no peace; it could not be otherwise. No human object could satisfy an immortal soul, nor could a dying man get rest in what he was to die out of. Yet, when he thought of himself, it was all I, I, I — I did it, and I found it vanity. But in the Song of Solomon we see all his blessedness, because there he speaks of Christ being everything to him. It has been said that in Ecclesiastes the heart was too great for the object. In the Song of Solomon the object is too great for the heart.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Commentators differ slightly on the register of the complaint. Others read the same verdict less as personal regret and more as an honest man feeling the wreckage sin has left in the world — "not the experience of the sinner reaping the fruit of what he has sown, but one of the old creation (though a sinner himself) feeling the ruin and disorder sin has brought on the earth" (C. E. Stuart).

The Word "Profit" and Its Answer

"Profit" is a running word in this book, and the New Testament picks it up and turns it over.

The word "profit" occurs several times in the book of Ecclesiastes. The Lord Jesus has ruled that if a man should gain the whole world, and lose his own soul, he would not be profited (Matt. 16:26). "But godliness with contentment is great gain" (1 Tim. 6:6). The man who penned these words found more than contentment — he found satisfaction, in Christ… The things that appealed to Solomon — gold, buildings, women, and so on — had no appeal to the apostle. Having them in such abundance and combination was in the end his undoing. Poor he might be, persecuted and despised, but he delighted to say, "To me to live is Christ" (Phil. 1:21). Let Paul be our model, not Solomon.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Where the Search Has to Go

If everything under the sun fails the test, the search must change direction, not effort.

Yes, the one who knew it by experience and wrote it by inspiration has called "all" — without any exception — "under the sun" "vanity and vexation of spirit." Turn where you will "under the sun" and you will not find anything on which the heart can rest. You must rise on the steady and vigorous wing of faith to regions "above the sun," to find "a better and an enduring substance."… None but Jesus can give "substance." None but He can "fill." None but He can "satisfy."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Full test. Solomon ran the experiment at one hundred per cent, on a scale no reader can reach, so nobody needs to repeat it.

- Full verdict. His joy is past tense before the review ends. The disillusionment was complete.

- The reason. Self was seeking its own satisfaction, and a dying man cannot rest in what he must die out of.

- The word. Scripture answers "no profit" under the sun with "great gain" — godliness with contentment.

- The direction. The search is not wrong; the altitude is. Nothing under the sun can fill the heart — only Christ can.

Ecclesiastes 2:12 · Darby

And I turned myself to behold wisdom, and madness, and folly; for what shall the man [do] that cometh after the king? -- that which hath already been done.

Solomon has just reviewed everything his hands built. Now he turns to weigh wisdom against madness and folly. Behind the survey lies a challenge no one else could make: if the richest and wisest king has already run the experiment, what is left for anyone who comes after him?

The one man qualified to ask

The question is not a boast. Solomon had the wisdom and the wealth to test life to its limits, so his verdict carries weight.

Man wants something more. Where can he find it? The wisdom of the ancients cannot supply it. The research of people alive today cannot supply it either. It needs someone gifted with real wisdom to weigh it, someone able to search hard into the things of earth to discover it. One, and only one, of the children of Adam has been equal to the task... God gave him a measure of wisdom surpassing all before him, and no one coming after him has ever equalled it. He was king in Jerusalem, owning wealth beyond any monarch the world has ever seen. All that wealth could buy, all that power could command, all that wisdom could search out — he could enjoy and understand it. "What," then, "can the man do who comes after the king?"

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Nothing new for the heir

The second half of the verse answers its own question before anyone can try.

His reflections follow on wisdom and madness and folly; for he knew what it must be for the man who comes in after the king: at best a repetition of the same empty pursuit of satisfaction here below.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Wisdom set beside madness and folly

It is striking that Solomon puts these three in one sentence. One writer finds the same odd mixture in the goods Solomon imported, and reads it as a personal descent.

As his kingdom prospered, we are told that his imports were "gold and silver, ivory, and apes and peacocks" (1 Kings 10:22). Apes stand for folly, and peacocks for vanity. For a man supreme on earth for wisdom this is a fall from the sublime to the ridiculous. We find the same strange blending of things that differ in Ecclesiastes 1:17, where he gives his heart to know wisdom, and to know madness and folly. Here in Ecclesiastes 2:12 he says it again: "So I turned to consider wisdom and madness and folly." Not at the same moment, surely! First he valued wisdom as more precious than rubies and fine gold; then he turned to madness and folly.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Philosophy tried, and found short

Pleasure and possessions have failed, so Solomon reaches for something higher. The change of subject does not change the outcome.

His search had disappointed him, but now he turns to something more ideal and less material than the things before. He turns philosopher, but it is no use. It leads down the same road and ends with the same groan — vanity and a striving after wind. Wisdom is superior to folly as far as light is superior to darkness. Yet wisdom cannot help man. It cannot give him peace or happiness. There is one event which happens to the wise man and to the fool: that event is death.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Not the complaint of a disappointed man

Ecclesiastes can read like the diary of a tired king, easy to wave off. Writers answer that God directed the record, and that one limit marks the whole search.

Solomon, who is the writer, goes through his experience of wisdom, of riches, of labour, and of all that his heart as a man could desire. And who can come after the king? He records it all by inspiration. So when he proves it to be nothing but vanity and a striving after wind, this is not the mere utterance of a disappointed man. It is a conviction God Himself recorded. The actions all carry the mark "under the sun," with no thought of doing them toward God.

Modernised from Concise Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Where the search does end

The search under the sun ends empty. So the answer must come from somewhere else.

Is there a higher wisdom and knowledge? There is, but in the book of the natural man it is unrevealed. That which satisfies, which is not vanity and a striving after wind, is that which is above the sun, and not under it. From above the sun He came, who is the wisdom of God, the Son of God... He died for our sins and is now back above the sun. In Him "are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge" (Colossians 2). That which alone can satisfy is Christ.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Tried — Solomon tested life with resources no one else has had. His verdict is not one man's bad mood. It is a conclusion recorded by inspiration.

- Repeated — his question answers itself. Whoever follows the king can only redo what the king already did.

- Mixed — the wisest of men searched wisdom and folly side by side, a fall from the sublime to the ridiculous.

- Levelled — wisdom beats folly as light beats darkness. Yet death comes to the wise man and the fool alike.

- Above — the whole search stays "under the sun." What satisfies came from above it: Christ Himself.

Ecclesiastes 2:13 · Darby

And I saw that wisdom excelleth folly, as light excelleth darkness.

Solomon has tested everything life offers and found nothing that lasts. Here he compares wisdom with folly, and admits that wisdom wins. So why does a book so full of "vanity" hand wisdom a real victory — and why does that victory solve so little?

The Witness Who Could Not Be Contradicted

The verdict here carries weight because of who reached it. Commentators point out that the writer was uniquely equipped by God to run the experiment and report the result honestly.

When we speak of Solomon's wisdom, we must remember that it was not mere genius, as people use that word. It was not the fruit of long study and hard work either. God gave him wisdom and knowledge, along with riches, wealth and honour, such as no king before him ever had, and such as no king after him will have (2 Chronicles 1:12). This was the man appointed to show faithfully what life on earth is for a fallen creature, and all it can ever be. And One, and One alone, who has walked this earth as man, has shown fully what man should be. David's son describes the first; David's Lord has displayed the second.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Wisdom Genuinely Wins

The verse is not a piece of gloom. It concedes something solid — and then immediately sets it beside a fact that spoils the pleasure of it.

Still, it is granted that wisdom has a profit above folly, as light has above darkness. The wise man has his eyes in his head, while the fool walks in darkness. Yet if the same end comes to all, what an irony!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Eyes in the Head

The picture in the following verse explains the comparison. A wise man's eyes are where they belong — looking, watching, reading what is in front of him.

We usually prefer to have dealings with a man who looks us straight between the eyes, for we assume he is a man of candour, of honesty and of courage. And generally speaking, a man's clear and steady eyes and his habit of using them may be taken as reliable indications of his character. It was said of old, "A wise man's eyes are in his head," and, "The eyes of a fool are in the ends of the earth." — Ecclesiastes 2:14; Proverbs 17:24.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

That open-eyed watchfulness has an everyday use. It means noticing what a life is producing and drawing the obvious conclusion.

This suggests that we keep our eyes open, and when we spot such people, we keep away from them. We know them by how they behave; watch for them. "The wise man's eyes are in his head" (Ecclesiastes 2:14). When we see persons who are marked by unclean things we should avoid them.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Where the Advantage Runs Out

Solomon's admission is real but narrow. The wise man sees better; he does not last longer.

"Then I saw that there is more gain in wisdom than in folly, as there is more gain in light than in darkness." He turns philosopher, but it is no use. It leads down the same road and ends with the same groan — vanity and a chasing of the wind. Wisdom is above folly as light is above darkness. Yet wisdom cannot help man. It cannot give him peace, and it cannot give him happiness. One event happens to the wise man and to the fool: that event is death.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Limit Marked by "Under the Sun"

The reason for that limit lies in the purpose of the book. It deals only with what a man can see and test in this life.

The difficulty here, like so many elsewhere, seems to spring from a misunderstanding of God's purpose in a book. "What is under the sun" — not the revelation of what is above and beyond it — is what is being discussed. So here it is simply the result of human experience, which knows nothing at all about what comes after death. The solution of all moral perplexities is found only in the unseen — in the Word of God, not in the world that now is.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Dissatisfaction That Points Somewhere

So the book's failure to satisfy is doing its work. The thirst it leaves has a purpose.

"That dissatisfaction with passing pleasures, which men mourn as the unhappiness of their nature, is in fact its privilege." That thought is right, and worth valuing. For this thirsting again, this spending of "labour for that which does not satisfy," throws the heart on Jesus.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Tested — God Himself gave this man wisdom, wealth and honour beyond any king before or after him. No one can say the test was unfair.

- Granted — Wisdom does beat folly, as light beats darkness. The book grants this instead of sinking all into gloom.

- Seeing — The wise man's eyes are in his head. He watches, and he stays away from people marked by unclean things.

- Stopped — The advantage runs out. Wisdom sharpens sight, but it gives no peace and no happiness. One event, death, meets wise man and fool alike.

- Beyond — The book looks only at life "under the sun." God's Word alone shows what lies above it. And the thirst this book leaves throws the heart on Jesus.

Ecclesiastes 2:14 · Darby

The wise man's eyes are in his head, and the fool walketh in darkness; but I myself also perceived that one event happeneth to them all.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Ecclesiastes 2:15 · Darby

And I said in my heart, As it happeneth to the fool so will it happen even to me; and why was I then so wise? Then I said in my heart that this also is vanity.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Ecclesiastes 2:16 · Darby

For there shall be no remembrance of the wise more than of the fool for ever; because everything is already forgotten in the days which come. And how dieth the wise even as the fool?

Solomon set out to test whether wisdom gives a man anything that lasts. Here the experiment collapses: the grave treats the wise man and the fool alike, and then erases the memory of both.

The verdict of a man who had everything

This verdict carries weight because of who reached it. One writer notes that Solomon lacked nothing he could have wanted, and that his wisdom stayed with him the whole way.

That was the wide range of pleasures he explored, both of the mind and of the body. No joy was withheld from him; yet even while he threw himself into all that he describes, he tells us his wisdom stayed with him. So he was fully able to judge what it was all worth, from his own experience and from the wisdom that never left him. Would not such a man be satisfied with what this life could give? If others with fewer advantages were disappointed, he at least had his fill of everything he wanted.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Wisdom's real advantage, and its limit

The verse does not deny that wisdom beats folly. It denies that the advantage survives death, and one writer traces where that leaves Solomon.

Still, wisdom does have a profit above folly, as light has above darkness. The wise man has his eyes in his head, while the fool walks in darkness. Yet if the result is the same for all, what an irony of events! He had found it so himself. Soon all alike would be forgotten here on earth, the one dying as the other. So he felt disgust at life and hated all his toil, above all because he must leave it to a successor — and who knows whether that man will be wise or a fool?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The leveller

Death does not just end the wise man. It flattens the distinctions he spent his life building. One writer notes that man comes off worse than the animals here, because he alone dreads what is coming.

Death brings everything down to its level — wise and fool, man and beast. What difference is there? Only that the beast can fill his place for a time with no regrets and no anticipations, and man cannot. Death he hates and dreads, and conscience forebodes judgment.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Whose reasoning is this?

The verse states the case honestly. But it is the case as one man sees it, reasoning from what he can observe. Read that way, "no enduring remembrance" marks the limit of human sight, not the limit of God.

As the natural man sees it, apart from revelation, death plunges the wise man and the fool into oblivion... That is how the natural man reasons. By revelation we know that there is remembrance.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

What the book deliberately withholds

Ecclesiastes never answers death on its own terms, and writers are candid that this is by design. The book hands you the problem; the answer comes from outside the book's own horizon.

Ecclesiastes has no word of resurrection. What it deals with is death — the stamp of vanity upon everything, and the one thing all men's reasoning can do so little to penetrate or understand. Faith shows death in its true character: the calling back of the spirit into His presence. Without that, death is a worthless zero. With it, death becomes almost infinite in value.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Above the sun

Solomon searched only "under the sun." One writer puts the failure there — not in the search, but in where the searcher looked.

This is the experience of a man with no equal in his ability, his circumstances, and his means. (What can the man do who comes after the king?) He searched for happiness, and found only vanity and a chasing after wind in all that is "done under the sun." How could it be otherwise, if man is an outcast from paradise and does not look in faith to Him who is above the sun?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The book does not leave the reader under the sun.

The book also directs us to Christ. There is something above the sun, something that does not vanish but stays. The old creation calls for a new creation, and Christ has made that possible.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Qualified — The man who says wisdom cannot outlast death had every advantage, and his wisdom stayed with him to the end. No one can call his verdict sour grapes.

- Real — Wisdom does beat folly, as light beats darkness. The verse does not deny its value, only that it lasts.

- Levelled — Death flattens wise and fool alike. Man feels this as the beast cannot: he dreads death, and his conscience warns him of judgment.

- Reported — "No enduring remembrance" is how a man reasons with only what he can see. By revelation we know there is remembrance.

- Answered — Ecclesiastes has no word of resurrection. Look only under the sun and you find vanity. The book itself points beyond the sun to Christ, in whom there is what abides.

Ecclesiastes 2:17 · Darby

And I hated life; for the work that is wrought under the sun was grievous unto me; for all is vanity and pursuit of the wind.

Solomon's search finally turns bitter. The man with every advantage looks at the world and cannot bear what he sees. Two questions follow: what made life hateful to him, and is his verdict the last word?

The verdict of the man best placed to test it

This is not the complaint of someone who missed out. It is the report of the one man who could try everything.

What gives this its particular point is the personal position of the Preacher. Suppose someone could look at man as he is on the earth and still escape the sense of misery. You would have thought that man would be King Solomon. What lies before us is his assessment in the Spirit, so that faith might profit from all he tells us. It is not from any lack of power, interest, or research, nor of ability or resources.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Death levels the wise and the fool

His hatred of life follows what he has just said about death. Wisdom is better than folly. It still cannot save anyone from the one event that comes to all.

The old, old question is, "Is life worth living?" After all he has said, the answer must be no. If all is vanity and a striving after wind, and there is no profit under the sun in anything a man enjoys, works for, and gets, then life is not worth living. He had been disappointed in his search, but now he turns to something more ideal... Wisdom is superior to folly as far as light is superior to darkness. Yet wisdom cannot help man. It cannot give him peace or happiness. There is one event which happens to the wise man and to the fool: that event is death.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why the work under the sun is grievous

The world was not always like this. Solomon is looking at a spoiled creation, and God makes the evil in it felt.

It was not so before sin entered into the world. On the contrary, God saw everything that He had made, and behold, it was very good. When sin was there, God made the evil felt... This day is far different. Crookedness and defect remain. They are too great for man, and it is not yet God's time. Meanwhile man feels the misery fully and spells it out in detail.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The grief here is not a man tasting the fruit of his own sins. It is a man seeing the whole scene as it is.

He sees what is crooked and knows what is lacking. But he cannot put things straight or supply what is missing... And remember, this is not the experience of a sinner reaping the fruit of what he has sown. It is the experience of a man of the old creation (though a sinner himself), feeling the ruin and disorder that sin has brought on the earth.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The limit of "under the sun"

The phrase Solomon keeps repeating is the key to his despair. He looks only at what lies below the sun, and that limit decides what he finds.

This is the experience of a man with no equal in his ability, his circumstances, and his means. For what can the man do who comes after the king? He searched for happiness, and found only vanity and a striving after wind in everything "done under the sun." How could it be otherwise, if man is an outcast from paradise and does not look in faith to Him who is above the sun?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Taken on its own, that earthly view has only one ending. The New Testament sets something else beside it.

Note that this is simply taking advantage of every material thing "under the sun." It looks at things only from an earthly viewpoint. So it teaches us that, apart from the revelation given by God, man's history is hopeless misery. How wonderful is the contrast in the New Testament! It presents the Lord Jesus Christ, His revelation of the glory of God, and the eternal inheritance of the saints in light.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

From no profit to great gain

Solomon's whole experiment paid nothing. One way of living does pay.

Now godliness means being conscious of God. It means living under the eye of God. It means having God as the trust and the glory of our hearts. Godliness like this, with the contentment that flows from it, is great gain.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Tested — the verdict comes from the one man with the wealth, wisdom and position to try everything. No one can say he lacked the chance.

- Levelled — wisdom does excel folly as light excels darkness. Yet death comes to the wise and the fool alike, and that is what makes life hateful to him.

- Spoiled — the work under the sun is grievous because sin has ruined a creation God once called very good. Solomon feels a disorder he cannot straighten.

- Bounded — his search never rises above the sun, and a life measured only by what is below it must end in "hopeless misery."

- Gained — Solomon found no profit under the sun. Godliness with contentment is great gain — living under God's eye is the one thing that pays.

Ecclesiastes 2:18 · Darby

And I hated all my labour wherewith I had been toiling under the sun, because I should leave it unto the man that shall be after me.

Solomon has just described the greatest building projects, wealth and pleasure any man could gather. Now he turns from what he made to who gets it. His complaint is not that the work was bad. It is that his work will pass to hands he cannot choose, test or control.

The boundary of the argument: "under the sun"

The verse names the boundary Solomon works inside. One writer counts that phrase and shows what it leaves out.

The expression "under the sun" comes twenty-nine times in this book. What is "under the sun" is on the earth. There is, of course, something above the sun — that is heaven, the heavenly things. Ecclesiastes deals with earthly things, with what man does apart from God — that is, the natural man. The book describes the things under the sun. It shows that everything man does — his pursuits, his labours, whatever he takes up and all that goes with it — is nothing but vanity and a chasing after wind. It never satisfies, and it is full of sorrow and perplexity.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why the labour turned to hatred

The thing that spoils the work is not failure but death. It arrives exactly at the moment the worker expects his reward.

Here we get a view of death that man does well to remember. Death is the wages of sin, but it is not viewed in that aspect in Ecclesiastes. Solomon does not dwell on the reason death entered the world. He dwells on its presence here, as a worm at the root of the tree of pleasure. It spoils pleasure and chills enjoyment. It cuts a man off just when he would sit down after years of toil to reap the fruit of his labour... This book looks at death from this side of the grave. It shows how death separates a man from the fruit of all his labour, just when he thinks he is about to gather it.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The sting: an heir who never worked

The next verse asks who that successor will be. One commentator traces Solomon's mind from weariness to open despair.

Soon all alike would be forgotten here below, the one dying as the other. So he came to loathe life and hated all his toil, above all because he had to leave it to a successor — and who knows whether he will be wise or a fool? Yet that man must have authority over all the toil and fruit of wisdom under the sun. This too was vanity. A feeling of despair followed over all his toil, as he thought of an heir who had never toiled.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Solomon's own heir

History answered Solomon's question. The heir was not wise, and ten tribes broke away.

According to the king's lament (Ecc. 2:19), the man to whom Solomon left all the fruit of his labour was not wise. His folly brought on him the consequences that God's counsels had attached to his father's sin. Under Jeroboam's leadership, ten tribes threw off the authority of the house of David. Looked at in terms of responsibility, the house of David has entirely and for ever lost its glory.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The uncertainty runs both ways, and not only on thrones. A wicked father can have a good son.

Hezekiah was a remarkably good man, and his father was notably wicked. How truly and how widely the wise Preacher's reflection about successors applies! It holds in a kingdom, and in the smaller circle of the household: "Who knows whether he will be wise or a fool?"

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Where the answer lies

The book does not solve the problem it exposes. The answer comes from outside its limits.

There is no question in it of grace or of redemption. It is the experience of a man — a king with wisdom and riches — about human life. He tries to solve every contradiction in the world while he views it all "under the sun." Only the wisdom that comes from above can solve these things, or leave them unsolved in peace. Only in the New Testament do we get "new creation." It rises above the confusion of fallen humanity and reveals "eternal life" that is in God's Son.

Modernised from Concise Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So hatred of one's own work is not the last word for a believer. Resurrection changes the value of what he does.

We have the strongest reason to work hard in the Lord's interests. We know that "in the Lord your labor is not in vain." The work may look useless as far as man and his little world are concerned. But in the Lord, and connected with the order of things established in resurrection, it is not in vain.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Under the sun. Solomon speaks inside a fixed limit — earthly things only, what man does apart from God.

- Death. Inside that limit, death is the worm at the root: it cuts a man off just when he sits down to enjoy what he built.

- Successor. What death removes, an unknown heir receives. He may be wise, he may be a fool. No one can tell in advance, in a kingdom or in a household.

- History. Solomon's fear was not just theory. His own heir proved unwise, and ten tribes broke away from his house.

- In the Lord. The answer lies above the sun: grace, new creation and eternal life. Work done for the Lord belongs to the order of resurrection, and is not in vain.

Ecclesiastes 2:19 · Darby

And who knoweth whether he will be a wise [man] or a fool? yet shall he have rule over all my labour at which I have laboured, and wherein I have been wise under the sun. This also is vanity.

The day Solomon dies, everything he built passes to somebody else. He cannot choose that person, and the verse asks the question no one can answer in advance: wise or a fool?

Life measured under the sun

The verse ends with two of this book's key terms: "vanity" and "under the sun." One writer explains each:

The word "vanity" means that which soon vanishes, nothingness. The other phrase to notice is "under the sun." It appears twenty-nine times in this book. What is "under the sun" is on the earth. There is, of course, something above the sun — that is heaven, the heavenly things. So Ecclesiastes deals with earthly things. It deals with what man does apart from God — the natural man. The book describes the things under the sun. It shows that everything man does is nothing but vanity and a chasing after wind. His pursuits, his labours, whatever he takes on and all that goes with it — all of it is always unsatisfying and full of sorrow and confusion.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The heir he could not choose

One writer traces how the thought of a successor turned Solomon's disgust into despair:

He hated life, and he hated all his toil — above all because he must leave it to a successor. And who knows whether that man will be wise or foolish? Yet that man must have power over all that toil and fruit of wisdom under the sun. This too was vanity. A feeling of despair followed over all his toil, as he thought of an heir who had never toiled.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Death's timing

The problem is not the work. Death cuts in at the moment the harvest is ready:

Death is the wages of sin, but it is not viewed in that light in Ecclesiastes. Solomon does not dwell on why it entered the world, but on its presence here as a worm at the root of the tree of pleasure. It spoils pleasure and chills enjoyment. It cuts a man off just when he would sit down to reap the fruit of years of toil.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

History's answer

Solomon's son Rehoboam inherited what Solomon built:

History answers the question. It shows with force the emptiness of all things that he felt so keenly. Rehoboam abandoned the advice of the old men who had served his father Solomon. That act of folly cost him the loyalty of the ten tribes. After three years of his reign he also abandoned the Lord. Shishak king of Egypt invaded, and Rehoboam lost the treasures Solomon had gathered. The shields of gold went to fill the treasuries of Egypt, and Rehoboam had to put shields of bronze in their place.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The uncertainty runs the other way too:

Hezekiah was a remarkably good man, with such a notably wicked father. The wise Preacher's reflection about one's successors applies truly and widely, whether in a kingdom or in the smaller circle of the household: "who knows whether he will be wise or a fool?"

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Hoarding for a child

People still hoard for their children. One writer says this can harm the child:

Yet people will build and hoard. If not for themselves, then for their children — or in other words, their second selves. If I hoard for my children, I am hoarding for myself. And not only that. In countless cases the hoard proves a positive curse to the child instead of a blessing. It takes him off the proper ground appointed for him, as for everyone, in God's moral government. That ground is "doing honest work with his own hands, so that he may have" — not to hoard for himself or for his second self, but — "something to share with anyone in need."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Work no successor can touch

One kind of work is never lost:

No toil, no testing, no suffering gone through in faith for the Lord will be lost. It is all treasured up. When our Lord Jesus Christ is revealed at the resurrection, it will be found to result in praise and glory and honour.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Under the sun. The verse measures life by what we can see on earth, apart from God. On that measure every pursuit ends in emptiness.

- The unknown heir. The successor tipped Solomon into despair, not the work. A man who never toiled will rule all the toil produced — and he may be wise or a fool.

- Death cuts in. The sting is timing. Death takes a man just when he would sit down to enjoy the harvest.

- Rehoboam. History gave the answer Solomon dreaded. His son lost ten tribes and the gold, and hung bronze shields where gold ones had been. Hezekiah shows the uncertainty runs both ways.

- What survives. Hoarding for a child can rob him of honest work and of dependence on God. Work done for the Lord is the one treasure no heir can spend.

Ecclesiastes 2:20 · Darby

Then I went about to cause my heart to despair of all the labour wherewith I had laboured under the sun.

The Preacher has just said he hated life and hated his work, because all he built must go to whoever comes next. Verse 20 is where that reasoning turns inward and settles into despair — but is despair the last word on life "under the sun"?

The turn into despair

Despair did not come first. One writer follows the steps to it: he hated his work, then he thought about the man who would inherit it.

So he came to loathe life and hated all his toil. He had to leave it to a successor, and who knows whether that man will be wise or a fool? Yet the successor will hold power over everything he toiled for and gained by wisdom under the sun. This too was vanity. Despair came over him about all his toil, as he thought of an heir who had done none of the work. What was there in his work but pain and frustration? Even at night his heart would not let him rest.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The heir he could not choose

The Preacher asks who knows whether his successor will be wise or a fool. One writer shows how history answered that question in Solomon's own family line.

Just as the king lamented (Ecc. 2:19), the man to whom Solomon left all the fruit of his labour was not wise. His folly brought on him the consequences that God had attached to his father's sin. Led by Jeroboam, ten tribes threw off the rule of the house of David. Measured by its responsibility, the house of David lost its glory completely and for ever.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Death spoils the harvest

Behind the despair stands death. The book does not explain where death came from. It shows what death does to the plans a man is still making.

Solomon does not dwell on the reason death entered the world. He dwells on its presence here, like a worm at the root of the tree of pleasure… It spoils pleasure and it chills enjoyment. It cuts a man off just when he would sit down, after years of toil, to enjoy the fruit of his work.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A heart larger than anything it can hold

Another writer puts the problem deeper still. It lies not in the heir, but in the self at the centre of the search.

For him, self was seeking its own satisfaction. So here there was no rest and no peace, and it could not be otherwise. No human object could satisfy an immortal soul. A dying man could find no rest in what he had to die and leave behind… As someone has said, in Ecclesiastes the heart was too great for the object; in the Song of Songs the object is too great for the heart.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What kind of words these are

How should a reader take words like these? One writer answers that God recorded the despair exactly, but it is a man's despair, spoken from inside the limits of what he can see.

Ecclesiastes 1:1 tells us these are the uninspired words of Solomon. But the book is the inspired record of his words. It shows the doubt that is natural to human wisdom, working within its own limits and cut off from God's revelation. The Preacher is in despair and can see nothing beyond the grave.

Modernised from W. R. DronsfieldOriginal wording

Above the sun

If nothing under the sun can hold the heart, the search must rise higher.

Turn where you will "under the sun" and you will find nothing the heart can rest on. You must rise on the strong, steady wing of faith to the regions "above the sun." There you find "a better and an enduring" possession. The One who sits at the right hand of God has said, "I walk in the way of righteousness, in the paths of justice, granting an inheritance to those who love me, and filling their treasuries" (Prov. 8:20-21).

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The experiment already run

Solomon's despair was expensive. He wrote it down so nobody else has to pay for the same conclusion.

God did not inspire him to do what he did, but God did inspire him to put the result of the experiment on record. Listen to what he says. I have investigated on a grand scale, on a scale that others can never touch. Others might have one per cent of it; I have had the whole hundred per cent. And the verdict is that there is no profit in it at all. There is "no profit under the sun."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. The despair does not come from failure. It comes from success he had to hand on to a successor who might be a fool — and his heir was one.

- Worm. Death sits at the root of every earthly pleasure, cutting a man off exactly when he sits down to enjoy what he built.

- Limit. This is despair measured "under the sun" — an inspired record of a man who could see nothing past the grave.

- Mismatch. No object under the sun is large enough for an immortal soul, and no dying man finds rest in what he must die out of.

- Gift. Solomon ran the experiment once, on the largest scale possible, and wrote the verdict down. Take "no profit" from him instead of paying to learn it.

Ecclesiastes 2:21 · Darby

For there is a man whose labour hath been with wisdom, and with knowledge, and with skill, and who leaveth it to a man that hath not laboured therein, to be his portion. This also is vanity and a great evil.

Solomon has just described work at its best — done with wisdom, knowledge and skill — and then watches it pass to a man who never worked for it. He calls that not just empty but a great evil, and this verse makes us ask why.

The heir who never worked

Solomon feared this while he was still at the height of his success, and the fear came true in his own family.

While he was prospering, one painful thought stayed with him: the heir to it all might turn out to be a fool… As the royal philosopher feared, so it happened. Rehoboam refused to listen to the reasonable complaints of his subjects. He drove ten of Israel's twelve tribes into revolt against the house of David, and no one has repaired that damage to this day.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Death, the great spoiler

Nothing but death forces a man to leave his life's work behind. Ecclesiastes does not explain where death came from. It shows what death does to human ambition.

Death is the wages of sin, but it is not viewed in this way in Ecclesiastes. Solomon does not dwell on why it entered the world, but on its presence here as a worm at the root of the tree of pleasure. It spoils pleasure and chills enjoyment. A man toils for years. Then, just as he sits down to reap the fruit of his labour, death cuts him off… But now, for the man who feels the results of the fall, death is the great spoiler. It blasts all his hopes.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer states plainly what the man loses and who gains it.

And the misery of it is just this: a man has laboured for years and naturally expects to enjoy what he, and not others, has piled up. But death comes in and takes him away, so he leaves all the fruit of his labour to be enjoyed by someone else.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The limit: "under the sun"

The book keeps reaching the same verdict, and the reason lies in where the writer stands. His repeated phrase "under the sun" marks the limit of his search.

This expression appears twenty-nine times in this book. Now what is "under the sun" is on the earth. There is, of course, something above the sun — that is heaven, the heavenly things. So Ecclesiastes deals with earthly things, with what man does apart from God… In all his searching and describing of the things under the sun, the writer makes one thing clear. He does not depend on divine revelation, on what is above the sun. He reaches his results by the light nature gives, and his resources are within himself… The book is in the Holy Scriptures for one purpose: to show man apart from God how hollow and empty everything under the sun is, and to make him seek and find what is better, what is above the sun.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why gifted people feel this most

This is not the complaint of a man who failed. The very advantages that should have brought satisfaction sharpened the ache.

The subject here is not guilt, as in Psalm 32 and Psalm 51, but the unhappiness of a man whose heart does not rise above created things. Take the fullest means, the highest ability, the highest rank, the most active mind, the most cultivated taste — yes, and wisdom above all men. All of it only makes the dissatisfaction and the misery deeper.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Work that no heir can take

If wise labour can end this way, does any work escape it? Commentators point to a different account — one that death cannot close.

The highest attainments or richest prosperity in things under the sun are all vanity. But the smallest service to the Lord — even giving a cup of cold water in His name — has the value of eternity in it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What a person holds now is not really his own.

The things you have here are your Master's goods. If you hoard them up here, you are certain to lose them later, and you will turn them into accusers. On the other hand, grace lets you transfer them truly to your own account, by laying them up where your treasure is — "in heaven."

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Labour that is not in vain

The conclusion is not that effort is pointless.

Because mere human work is vanity is no reason to be lazy in the Lord's work. Faith in the living God and diligence go together, for in this there is no vanity: "your labor is not in vain in the Lord."

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Labour. Wisdom, knowledge and skill can build something excellent. The builder still hands it to a man who never worked for it. Solomon's own heir, Rehoboam, proved his fear right.

- Death. Death forces the handover. It is the wages of sin, but this book does not look at it that way. It shows death as the worm at the root, cutting a man off just as he sits down to enjoy the harvest.

- Limit. The writer passes his whole verdict "under the sun," from the earth only, by the light nature gives and not God's revelation. That is why the book drives the reader to look above the sun.

- Intensity. Greater means, rank and ability do not soften the ache. They sharpen it. The trouble is a heart that never rises above created things.

- Transfer. Hoard your Master's goods here and you lose them; they become your accusers. Spend them for the Lord — even a cup of cold water — and they move to an account no heir can touch. That labour is not in vain.

Ecclesiastes 2:22 · Darby

For what will man have of all his labour and of the striving of his heart, wherewith he hath wearied himself under the sun?

Solomon has just described the sleepless work of a lifetime, and now he asks what a man takes home after all that effort and strain. He leaves the question hanging on purpose, and everything turns on four words — "under the sun."

Under the sun

The phrase Solomon repeats through the book sets the limits of his question. He weighs everything on earth, using only what a man can see and work out for himself.

The next phrase we notice is "under the sun." It appears twenty-nine times in this book. What is under the sun is on the earth. There is, of course, something above the sun: heaven, the heavenly things. So Ecclesiastes deals with earthly things, with what man does apart from God — that is, the natural man. The book describes the things under the sun. It shows that all man does — his pursuits, his work, whatever he takes up and everything tied to it — is nothing but vanity and frustration of spirit. It never satisfies. It is full of sorrow and confusion. In all his searching he does not depend on God's revelation, on what is above the sun. He reaches his results by the light nature gives, and his resources are inside himself.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The man best placed to answer

If anyone could have escaped this verdict, it was the man who wrote it.

What gives it particular point is who the Preacher is. If anyone could look at man as he is on the earth and not feel the misery of it, you would have expected that man to be king Solomon. What lies before us is his appraisal in the Spirit, so that faith might profit by all he tells us. It is not from lack of power, interest, or research, any more than of capability or resources.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where toil came from

The strain Solomon describes was not part of the world as God made it.

Because of Adam's sin the ground was made to bring forth thorns and thistles, and from then on man must eat his bread in labour and toil, in the sweat of his face. That is to say, labour and toil began with sin — the keeping and dressing of the garden was neither labour nor toil, in the language of Scripture.

Modernised from C J DavisOriginal wording

Why the sum never adds up

The question bites because a man is cut off from his own results. Death arrives before the harvest.

What a trouble death is — an unwelcome visitor whom nobody can keep out of his house. It comes uninvited, at a time man thinks is wrong, and it strips its victim of everything... The thread of a man's life unrolls in front of him. At one end is his birth; at the other, his exit from the world by death. All he sees is the short life of a mortal born to die. So we can understand the reason for that cry: "What has a man from all the toil...?"

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The heart no object can fill

Solomon names two things in the verse: the toil, and the striving of heart. The second points to what Solomon was really after.

In Ecclesiastes, Solomon says that all is vanity and a striving after wind. Why so? To him, self was seeking its own satisfaction. Here, then, was no rest, no peace; it could not be otherwise. No human object could satisfy an immortal soul, nor could a dying man find rest in what he was to die out of. Yet when thinking of himself it was all I, I, I; I did it, and I found it vanity.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Above the sun

Solomon asks his question inside a closed circle. The answer must come from outside it.

But is there something else that satisfies? Is there a higher wisdom and knowledge? There is, but the book of the natural man does not reveal it. What satisfies, what is not vanity and frustration of spirit, is what is above the sun, not under it. From above the sun He came, who is the wisdom of God, the Son of God... That which alone can satisfy is Christ.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

That changes what a working life can come to. The same work, done for the Lord, belongs to an order death does not end.

We have the strongest reason for hard work in the Lord's interests: we know that "in the Lord your labor is not in vain." It may look useless as far as man and his little world are concerned. But in the Lord, and as part of the order of things established in resurrection, it is not in vain.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- The question. Solomon asks what a man's toil and mental strain leave him with. He gives no answer, because inside the limits he has set there is none.

- The limit. "Under the sun" means on the earth. A man works it all out by his own resources, with no revelation from above, and inside that circle everything comes back empty.

- The cause. Labour and toil began with sin and the cursed ground; the garden work before that was no toil at all.

- The verdict. Death strips a man of everything just as he sits down to enjoy it. And no object on earth was ever big enough for a soul that outlives it.

- The answer. It comes from above the sun, where Christ came from. Work done for Him is not lost, because it belongs to the order of things established in resurrection.

Ecclesiastes 2:23 · Darby

For all his days are sorrows, and his travail vexation even in the night his heart taketh no rest. This also is vanity.

Solomon has just watched his life's work slip toward an heir he did not choose. Now he adds up the cost: painful days, and a heart that will not switch off at night. Is this despair God approves, or the honest report of a man measuring life by what he can see?

The vantage point: under the sun

This verdict comes from a book that stays inside what a man can see for himself. One repeated phrase marks that limit.

Another word we notice is "under the sun." This expression is found twenty-nine times in this book. Now that which is "under the sun" is on the earth. There is, of course, something which is above the sun, that is heaven, the heavenly things. Ecclesiastes deals with earthly things — with what man does apart from God, that is, the natural man. The book describes the things under the sun. It shows that all a man does — his pursuits, his labours, whatever he undertakes and everything tied to it — is nothing but vanity and vexation of spirit. It never satisfies, and it is filled with sorrow and perplexity.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What soured the days

The sorrow here is not vague sadness. It grows out of what came just before.

A feeling of despair came over all his toil, as he thought of an heir who had not toiled. For what was there but pain and vexation in his employment, even in the night his heart refused him rest.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Behind the heir stands death. That is why he must hand the fruit to someone else.

It mars pleasure, it chills enjoyment, for it cuts off man just when he would sit down after years of toil to reap the fruit of his labour.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Toil, not work

The toil in this verse is not ordinary work. One writer explains the word behind it, and points to where that drudgery finds its answer.

Then the other word, "perverseness," is rather "labour," or "travail." It is the word which, as we have seen, gives us the first part of the name "Amalek" — amal. It is not work: man in Eden was to work; but toil — the drudgery of work, above all the drudgery that a heart away from God drives us to... And from this the grace of God in Christ would draw us away: "Come to me, all who labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why the nights give no relief

Two things keep him awake. What he owns is too small for his soul, and he must leave it behind.

In Ecclesiastes, Solomon says there is no good thing under the sun, and that all is vanity and vexation of spirit. Why so? To him, self was seeking its own satisfaction. Here, then, was no rest, no peace; it could not be otherwise. No human object could satisfy an immortal soul, nor could a dying man get rest in what he was to die out of. Yet, when thinking of himself, it was all I, I, I, I did it, and I found it vanity.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why such a bleak verse sits in Scripture

Some readers stumble over a verse this bleak. Commentators draw a line between what God records and what God Himself asserts.

The explanation lies in the difference between revelation and inspiration. Not all Scripture is direct revelation from God. Some of it is history in which the sayings of evil men and even of Satan are recorded. A book like Ecclesiastes is largely the record of Solomon's thoughts, reasonings and disappointments. He was looking for happiness in satisfying his natural desires. Yet all is given to us by inspiration of God. The accounts of what was done or said are divinely accurate. God led Solomon to record his mental struggles with such divine fitness that they profit us for warning and correction.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Rest as a gift, never a wage

If the night gives no rest, the answer is not harder effort. Commentators point to the opposite of this restless night: rest that comes as a gift.

The obvious contrast is between securing something by our own efforts and looking for it as God's gift... Quiet of mind and restful enjoyment can never be gained as the fruit of our own toil. God is the giver of all repose to His beloved. Once they accept this simple truth, they stop being anxious and stop their worried labour. He keeps them in perfect peace, whatever the outlook, with their minds resting on Him.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Standpoint. "Under the sun" marks the whole search: earth only, natural reason only, and therefore sorrow and perplexity as the result.

- Cause. The grief starts with an heir who never toiled, and behind him with death, which cuts a man off just as he sits down to enjoy the harvest.

- Word. The term is not "work" but toil — drudgery driven by a heart away from God, the very thing Christ invites the weary to bring to Him.

- Sleeplessness. No earthly object is big enough for an immortal soul, and no dying man rests in what he must die out of.

- Answer. Effort never earns rest of mind; God gives it. That is why the record of Solomon's despair stands in Scripture, to warn us.

Ecclesiastes 2:24 · Darby

There is nothing good for man, but that he should eat and drink, and that he should make his soul enjoy good in his labour. This also I saw, that it was from the hand of God.

Solomon writes this line at the end of a long experiment. He had tried pleasure, building projects, wisdom and folly. None of it gave him lasting profit. So is "eat and drink and find enjoyment" God's counsel for a happy life? Or is it the best a man can manage when he looks no higher than this world?

Where the words fall in the argument

The verse is a landing point, not a starting point. One commentator traces the failed attempts that come just before it:

So mirth is tried next... It was all in vain, and the feeling of disappointment returns. Might not activity in great works succeed better? Solomon tried this and carried it out with extraordinary diligence and splendour. But looking back over all this work he did and the toil he toiled at, he could rest in none of it. The whole was vanity and distress of spirit, and no profit under the sun.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The chapter that leads up to this verse is crowded with one word. A writer counts how often the speaker says "I":

Ecclesiastes 2 is Solomon's "I" chapter: that personal pronoun occurs 16 times in the first 9 verses: a true chapter of the self-gratified "I."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

"From the hand of God"

The second half of the verse changes the tone of the first. Food and work come to him from God's hand:

The conclusion reached in verses 24-26 is to receive thankfully what comes from the hand of God. He gives man good in His sight: wisdom and knowledge and joy. But to the sinner He gives hard labour, to gather and heap up, so that it may be given to the one who is good in God's sight. And what is this but vanity and distress of spirit?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The ability to enjoy is itself a gift

Owning food, drink and work is not the same as being able to take pleasure in them. That distinction is the point the searcher finally reaches:

The conclusion reached is that, apart from God, man has no capacity to enjoy his labour.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why the outlook is so low

Ecclesiastes reasons only from what a man can see "under the sun". That is why some of its lines sound almost faithless:

This book gives us the experience of man, and the reasonings of man, on all that happens under the sun. Remember that, and there is no difficulty in those passages that have the appearance of unbelief. The experience of man is necessarily unbelieving. He confesses his ignorance; for beyond what is seen, experience can know nothing. But the solution of all moral problems is above and beyond what is seen. The only rule of life then is to fear the God who controls our life, and who judges every action. There is no question, in this book, of grace or of redemption, but only of the experience of this present life.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Commentators differ on the status of the words

Some read the verse as a sober, thankful conclusion. Others read it far more sharply — as Solomon's own poor thinking, faithfully preserved for our warning:

We must never overlook the difference between revelation and inspiration. All Scripture is inspired by God, but not every word found in it is a revelation from God. Take what Solomon wrote, for instance: "There is nothing better for a person than that he should eat and drink…" He was not speaking a revelation from God. He was speaking his own foolishness — inspired to put it on record for our warning.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The same writer then applies that test to this verse:

Is this a revelation from God? Is it God's voice telling us that food and drink are, after all, the highest good? Emphatically no! What, then? It is the divinely inspired record of the extreme folly that the wisest of men may be led into if he has no light above his natural reason and observation. And how good of God to give us a glimpse of this in His inspired record.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the Preacher could not reach

Whatever weight we give the advice, no one claims it satisfies. The book's own repeated phrase marks the boundary:

We may sum it all up in a brief sentence. Man under the sun, whatever he does, finds no satisfaction. All his labours, all his riches, all his seeking for good, all his achievements cannot give what the soul of man craves and needs... What man needs is not anything "under the sun" but what is "from above the sun."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Search. Solomon tried mirth, wine, wisdom, folly and vast building projects. He could rest in none of it. The whole was vanity and no profit under the sun.

- Self. Chapter 2 says "I" sixteen times in nine verses: the chapter of the self-gratified "I."

- Gift. The counsel is to receive with thanks what comes from God's hand. Even the ability to enjoy your own work is not in man apart from God.

- Limit. The book records man's experience and reasoning under the sun. Experience knows nothing beyond what it sees, so lines like this can sound unbelieving. Grace and redemption are not its subject; its one rule of life is to fear God, who judges every action.

- Above. Commentators differ. Is this a sober conclusion, or Solomon's folly recorded for our warning? Both agree on one thing: what man needs is not found under the sun, but above it.

Ecclesiastes 2:25 · Darby

For who can eat, or who be eager, more than I?

Solomon has just said that even the simple enjoyment of food and work comes from God's hand, and here he presses the point home. Some older translations read the line differently — "who else can hasten (or enjoy) more than I?" — yet both readings raise the same issue: no one produces enjoyment for himself.

The man best placed to answer

The man asking was not shut out from pleasure. He had everything a human being could want, which is why his verdict carries weight.

God gave him wisdom greater than all who came before him, and no one after him has ever matched it. He was king in Jerusalem. He held wealth beyond any ruler the world has ever seen ("for silver was counted as nothing in the days of Solomon"). All that wealth could buy, all that power could command, all that wisdom could search out — he could enjoy and understand. "What," then, "can the man do who comes after the king?" "Who can eat, or who else can hasten (or enjoy) more than I?"

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A capacity, not a possession

Owning food and being able to enjoy it are two different things. This verse settles where the second one comes from.

The conclusion reached is that, apart from God, man has no capacity to enjoy his labor.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Receiving from His hand

If the power to enjoy is His to give, the fitting response is an open hand, not a grasping one. One writer sums up how the chapter closes:

The conclusion in verses 24-26 is to receive with thanks what comes from the hand of God. He gives man good in His sight — wisdom and knowledge and joy. But He gives the sinner toil, to gather and heap up, so that it goes to the one who is good in God's sight. And what is this but vanity and frustration of spirit?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why nothing under the sun ever fills

The problem was never a shortage of supply. The human heart is too large for any created thing to fill — and only God can enlarge it and fill it.

No human object could satisfy an immortal soul. A dying man could not find rest in what he was about to die and leave behind… We need a large capacity for the enjoyment of God Himself — a capacity that none but God can give and none but God can fill.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer starts from the opening image of the book.

Solomon says, "All streams run to the sea, but the sea is not full." The sea is the human heart. If you could direct into those discontented hearts every river of earthly pleasure, they would still remain unfilled, unsatisfied. Men hunt for satisfaction where it can never be found. An iceberg yields no heat, salt no sweetness, and wine cannot be pressed from turnips. Man's heart was made for God, and only God, in Christ, can fill and satisfy it.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

How to read these verses

Commentators differ here. Some, as above, treat them as a real call to receive God's gifts with thanks. Others read them as the inspired record of where human reasoning ends up when it stays under the sun.

Do you need an illustration of this? Turn to Ecclesiastes 2:24: "There is nothing better for a person than that he should eat and drink and find enjoyment in his toil." Is this a revelation from God? Is it God's voice telling us that food and drink are, after all, the highest good? Emphatically no! What then? It is the God-inspired record of the extreme folly the wisest of men can be led into if he has no light above his own natural reason and observation. And how good of God to give us a glimpse of this in His inspired record!

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- The tester. The question comes from the one man who could try everything wealth could buy, power could command and wisdom could search out. No one can say he lacked the means to enjoy life.

- The verdict. Apart from God, man has no capacity to enjoy his own labor. The goods and the gladness are two separate things.

- The source. The ability to enjoy is a gift. So receive with thanks what comes from the hand of God, instead of gathering and heaping up.

- The capacity. No created object can satisfy an immortal soul. Only God can give the capacity to enjoy Him, and only God can fill it.

- The caution. Commentators differ. Is this conclusion God's counsel, or a record of how far reasoning gets when it stays under the sun? Read it alongside the rest of Scripture, not on its own.

Ecclesiastes 2:26 · Darby

For he giveth to a man that is good in his sight wisdom, and knowledge, and joy; but to the sinner he giveth travail to gather and to heap up, that he may give to him that is good in God's sight. This also is vanity and pursuit of the wind.

This chapter's great experiment ends with a split: God gives one man wisdom, knowledge and joy, and gives another only the work of piling up wealth for someone else to spend. Yet the verse ends in the same verdict as everything before it, so why is a verse about God's gifts filed under emptiness?

The conclusion of the whole experiment

Chapter 2 records a man trying everything and resting in nothing. The last three verses turn from what he grabbed at to what God hands him:

The conclusion reached in verses 24-26 is to receive thankfully what comes from the hand of God... And what is this but vanity and vexation of spirit?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The capacity to enjoy

The verse does not say that the good man works harder for his joy. It says God gives it. The chapter proves it the hard way. A man can own everything and still not taste it:

The conclusion reached is that, apart from God, man has no capacity to enjoy his labour.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What "good in His sight" receives

The man who pleases God receives three things: wisdom, knowledge and joy. One writer takes up the third and shows both its worth and its limit:

Natural joy is very precious. According to the Preacher in Ecclesiastes 2:26, it is one of three things that God gives to a man who is good in His sight. Natural goodness, under the government of God, brings its own reward of natural joy. But the joys of nature soon fade when the trials and sorrows that man inherits arrive. In the end the tested soul discovers that all is vanity and vexation of spirit.

Modernised from Twenty Gospel TractsOriginal wording

The sinner gathers for someone else

The second half of the verse describes a transfer: what one man piles up, another ends up holding. One writer explains who that other man is, and why the wealth moves:

A good man is like the One who found him evil, and by grace made him a sharer in the divine nature, escaping the corruption that is in the world through lust. The wealth of the sinner, great as it may seem, is stored up for the just. Ungodliness may prepare, devise, and pass on an estate; but God cares for those who serve Him. So the just will put on the clothing meant for others, and the innocent will divide the silver, if He sees fit.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the verdict is still "vanity"

If God is handing out wisdom and joy, why does the sentence end in emptiness? Because of what this book is measuring — happiness built out of things below, in a world where evil is present:

Evil is here. In a world like this, God's government does not work to secure happiness for man down here — a happiness drawn from the things below and resting on how stable they are. Yet as a general rule it does protect those who walk with God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What this book was never asked to answer

This book is honest about its own limits. It reports what a man can see and reason out under the sun, and stops there:

This book gives us the experience of man, and the reasoning of man, about all that happens under the sun. Remember that, and the passages that look like unbelief cause no difficulty. Man's experience is bound to be unbelieving. He confesses his ignorance; for beyond what is seen, experience can know nothing. But the answer to every moral problem lies above and beyond what is seen, and this book makes that clear... There is no question in this book of grace or of redemption, but only of the experience of this present life.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where the thirst is met

The chapter leaves a man with gifts he cannot hold and a hunger nothing under the sun will fill. One writer names who can end it:

Thank God, there is One who can still the hunger and thirst of the soul, who graciously invites, "If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The same shortfall showed up at a wedding where the drink ran out, and what was served next was not more of the same:

The wedding feast at Cana of Galilee showed how quickly natural joy passes: the wine ran out. But there the Lord Jesus revealed a source of an entirely new kind of joy in the best wine of His own providing. This new joy is from God, and a person knows it when he receives the gospel.

Modernised from Twenty Gospel TractsOriginal wording

Summary

- Given, not gained — wisdom, knowledge and joy come from God's hand. Receive them with thanks instead of chasing them.

- Capacity, not just contents — apart from God a man has no power to enjoy his own labour, however much of it he owns.

- Government, not luck — the sinner's heap ends up with the just, because God cares for those who serve Him.

- Fading, not lasting — natural joy is real and precious, but it fades under the trials a man inherits. That is why the verse still reads "vanity."

- Under the sun, not beyond it — this book records man's experience, with no word of grace or redemption. Only the One who invites the thirsty to come and drink can meet that thirst.