Then Jeshurun grew fat, and kicked -- Thou art waxen fat, Thou art grown thick, And thou art covered with fatness; -- He gave up +God who made him, And lightly esteemed the Rock of his salvation.
This verse is the hinge of the song Moses taught Israel. A well-fed, well-blessed people turn on the God who fed them, and commentators read it as both Israel's history and a warning for any believer.
The verse does not call Israel by a name of shame. It uses a title of honour, which makes what follows worse.
We cannot be sure of the exact meaning of Jeshurun. It seems to lie between "upright ones" and "beloved of Jehovah." So we start with God's thoughts about His people. They are the beloved of His heart, fitted to live here on earth in uprightness, in full keeping with their calling.
The break comes at this verse, and it does not come from God's side.
At verse 15, we reach a very different note in the song of Moses. Up to this point, God Himself has been before us. We have had His actings, His purposes, His counsels, His thoughts, His loving interest in His people Israel, His tender gracious dealings with them. There can be no drawback here. When we have God and His ways before us, nothing hinders the heart's enjoyment.
The trouble does not begin with hardship. It begins with plenty.
Jeshurun grew fat and kicked: God's loved, upright one became rebellious in prosperity — a strange, common case — and gave up his Maker, and lightly esteemed the Rock of his salvation. Then the heart estranged from Him turned to those that were His opposites.
One writer finds the meaning of fatness in the offerings, where all the fat was the Lord's.
The fat shows the energy of the inward will. Compare Deuteronomy 32:15, "Jeshurun grew fat, and kicked" — the will was set against God. Here the fat was not the Lord's. In the Lord Jesus there was perfect subjection and devotedness: "Behold, I have come to do your will, O God." There the fat was all the Lord's.
The kick is not yet idol-worship. It is something far more ordinary.
The verse goes on, "and kicked." This is an early sign of turning away — if not the earliest. Instead of lowliness and meekness, bearing with one another in love; instead of quietly submitting to and accepting the will and way of the Lord, we put a will and way of our own in their place. There is impatience of spirit. There is a determination to get rid, by any means, of whatever resists our idea of things. There is resistance to authority or correction. There is a fretful impatience that will not wait for the Lord to direct and handle things.
The verse drops two titles in one breath: the God who made him, and the Rock of his salvation. Writers see the second one reaching forward to Christ and to the way Israel treated Him.
They took ungodly advantage of their prosperity. They forsook the God who made them, and treated the Rock of their salvation with scorn. Of course this Rock is Christ. When He came, His own nation scorned and rejected Him, for they had chosen other gods.
The words "the God who made him" point to a purpose, not just to creation.
Suppose a servant stops living out the truth the Lord has made known to him. Whatever his excuse, he has stopped being, in practice, one of the "upright ones." He has so far forsaken the God who made him. Made him for what? Surely to be the instrument of His will, the vessel of His pleasure, the witness to His Name.
Israel's turning had a result far beyond Israel.
But Jeshurun (Israel) grew fat, and kicked, and forsook the Rock of his strength. As a result God moves them to jealousy with those who are not a people. It is the call of the Gentiles, according to Romans 10:19.
Commentators do not leave this verse in Israel's past. They turn it on us.
Surrounded, on all sides, by the rich and varied mercies of God, we are apt to use them to feed a spirit of self-satisfaction. We make use of the gifts to shut out the Giver. In a word, we, too, like Israel, grow fat and kick. We forget God. We lose the sweet and precious sense of His presence, and of His perfect sufficiency, and turn to other objects as Israel turned to false gods.
- Beloved. Jeshurun is a name of honour: "upright ones," "beloved of Jehovah." The fall here is a fall from God's own good thoughts about His people.
- Fed. The fatness came from God's hand; the danger point in this verse is not hardship but abundance, "rebellious in prosperity — a strange, common case."
- Kicking. The first sign is not idolatry but self-will. It shows as impatience, resistance to correction, and our own way put in place of the Lord's.
- Forsaking. To leave "the God who made him" is to walk away from the purpose He made you for. To scorn "the Rock of his salvation" points on to Christ, whom His own nation would reject.
- Consequence. Israel's kick led God to move them to jealousy by "those who are not a people." The same warning turns back on us: we use the gifts to shut out the Giver.
They moved him to jealousy with strange gods, With abominations did they provoke him to anger.
Moses' song looks ahead to a people settled, rich, and safe. It then names what they did with that safety: they turned to gods that were not God. Two questions follow. Why would a blessed people do this? And why does God call His response jealousy?
The turn described here does not start with idols. It starts with comfort, and with a name that no longer fits.
"But Jeshurun grew fat and kicked" (v.15). Jeshurun means "upright." That was Israel's proper character, but they gave it up when they became rich. This is prophetic of their time in the land, when God prospered them by His pure grace. They took godless advantage of their wealth. They abandoned the God who made them, and they held the Rock of their salvation in scorn. This Rock is Christ. When He came, His own nation scorned and rejected Him, because they had chosen other gods. Their detestable idolatry provoked God to anger (v.16).
Once the affections leave God, they do not stay empty. They attach to whatever is furthest from Him.
Then the heart, estranged from Him, turned to those that were His opposites. Strange gods came in, with their abominations. Newly invented gods took the place of Him who had brought them into being. The same thing has been repeated ever since, in every form you can imagine.
The word "abominations" has one settled sense through the Old Testament. It also warns what idolatry does to the worshipper.
"Abominations" simply means idols. The word "abomination" occurs constantly in the Old Testament, meaning an idol. It is tied to everything degraded. The moment a man gives up belief in the true God, he is sure to degrade himself. If a man does not look to something above himself, he will sink to what is below him, as we see in Romans 1.
People have always found ways to call idolatry harmless — a custom, a formality, a habit that means nothing. God's estimate runs the opposite way.
In every age, one thing marks the gap between God's word and men's thoughts more than anything else. People take idols and strange gods lightly. God hates that, above all in His own people. There may be no deliberate plan to abandon His worship. It may only be what they count a small thing: going along with idolatry now and then, while still claiming His name. But God rejects such a compromise outright. And those who allow it face a further danger — complete revolt from Him. It strikes at His majesty, at holiness and truth, and is intolerable in His eyes. Israel should have known that God called Abraham out of this very abomination, to be a separate witness, with his descendants, to the one true and living God (Joshua 24:3).
Jealousy sounds like a flaw in God. Then ask what love would be without it:
Love cannot help being jealous of wandering affections; it would not be love if it did not resent unfaithfulness. And is He so powerless that we can despise Him and get away with it? Are we stronger than He?
God's answer to their jealousy was to call the nations in. Even that is not where the song ends.
The very call of the Gentiles is only to provoke them to jealousy (v. 21), as the apostle drew from this long afterwards, when it came to pass (Rom. 10:19)... but even when He restores Israel as He will (v. 36), He calls the Gentiles to rejoice with His people (v. 43).
Israel is the subject of the song, but the pattern is not theirs alone.
There is a solemn voice in all this for the writer and the reader. Each of us is in danger of walking the moral path these words describe. Surrounded on all sides by the rich and varied mercies of God, we are apt to use them to feed a spirit of self-satisfaction. We use the gifts to shut out the Giver. In a word, we too, like Israel, grow fat and kick. We forget God.
- Fatness. The slide begins with prosperity, not persecution. Jeshurun, "the upright one," grew rich and kicked.
- Forsaking. The heart that leaves God does not stay neutral; it turns to His opposites and takes up newly invented gods.
- Abomination. The word means idols. Idolatry drags the worshipper down: whoever will not look above himself sinks below himself.
- Jealousy. God's response is not petty temper. It is love refusing a rival: love would not be love if it did not resent unfaithfulness.
- Restoration. God answered their jealousy by calling the nations (Rom. 10:19). Yet the same song ends with Israel restored and the nations rejoicing with His people.
They sacrificed unto demons who are not +God; To gods whom they knew not, To new ones, who came newly up, Whom your fathers revered not.
Moses' song turns dark here: the people God had cared for gave their sacrifices to something else. The verse names it — demons, not rival gods — and the New Testament quotes the line to explain idol worship.
The word behind "demons" is harsher than it sounds. A dictionary of Bible words traces it, and a second word used elsewhere for the same beings:
The Hebrew word shed, though traced from the word "lord," properly means "a destroyer, a violent one; and so, figuratively, a mischievous demon." It appears only twice in the whole Old Testament. A second word, sair, means "rough, hairy," and especially a he-goat: so "a goat-shaped deity, which people worshipped as an idol… People believed such hostile beings lived in the deserts and woods, and that they had to appease them with divine worship."
Scripture says two things at once. The carved image is empty. The worship offered to it still reaches someone real. One writer holds both together:
In 1 Corinthians 10:20 the apostle quotes Deuteronomy 32:17 and declares what idolatry really is, though the form may differ. Men worshipped the heavens and all their host, the earth and the sea and their creatures, the serpent especially, or heroes and dead ancestors, or legendary beings and their images. It soon took hold of their imagination. It did not only shut God out; it degraded its followers to the utmost. And no wonder. For both Old Testament and New declare that what they sacrificed, they sacrificed to demons, not to God. Demons were in effect behind the idols. If the idols were nothing in themselves, the demons were an awful reality of subtle and malignant evil, ruining those who honoured the idols.
The worshippers would not have described what they were doing this way. The gap between what they meant and what happened is the point:
The idols and their sacrifices may be completely powerless. But demons hiding behind them can and do shut the true God out of souls. They seize the homage due to Him alone. This is the effect of heathen worship, not the intention of the worshippers or of those who share in their sacrifices. They no more planned to revere demons (fallen and evil spirits) than the unconverted today mean to serve Satan. But they did, and they do, all the same.
The verse calls these gods newcomers: Israel had not known them, and their fathers had never feared them. The forms change, but the worship does not:
Here is the general rule. Take any person, thing, or theory — what I call a "principle" when I hold it myself, and a "fad" when someone else holds it. If we let it hold the place, the authority, and the devotion that belong to our Creator, it is a false god we are serving, whatever pleasant name we give it… So the crude outward forms of idolatry pass away; but those who worship the false gods still worship in spirit and in fact.
The verse follows a picture of a nation grown comfortable and full. One writer turns that on the reader:
There is a solemn voice in all this for the writer and the reader… God's mercies surround us on every side, rich and varied. We are apt to use them to feed a spirit of self-satisfaction. We use the gifts to shut out the Giver. In a word, we too, like Israel, grow fat and kick. We forget God. We lose the sweet and precious sense of His presence and of His perfect sufficiency. We turn to other objects, as Israel turned to false gods.
Some have stretched this verse to cover disagreements between Christians. One writer answered that plainly. His translation says "devils" where the ESV says "demons":
Scripture states plainly what "devils" means. It means nothing but the gods of the heathen, and it points back to Deuteronomy 32:17: "they offered to devils, and not to God." To apply this to Baptists or Independents is a gross abuse. The apostle is speaking of fellowship with demons (in idol temples) and heathen sacrifices, and nothing else.
Within its own field, though, the line is absolute:
Behind the things people worshipped were real beings — evil, unclean spirits. So it was impossible to have fellowship with the Lord Jesus and with these demons at the same time.
- Destroyer. The word behind "demons" means a destroyer, a violent one. These beings were hostile, not helpful.
- Nothing, yet real. The idol itself is empty; the power standing behind it is an awful reality of subtle and malignant evil.
- Effect, not intention. Worshippers never planned to honour demons. Demons still seized the homage due to God alone. Sincerity does not redirect worship.
- New names, same trade. The crude forms pass away. Whatever takes the devotion owed to the Creator is a false god under a nicer name.
- Full, then forgetful. Israel grew fat and kicked. We too can use the gifts to shut out the Giver. And no one can hold fellowship with Christ and with demons at once.
Of the Rock that begot thee wast thou unmindful, And thou hast forgotten God who brought thee forth.
Moses' song reaches its saddest line here: the people who owe their very existence to God have put Him out of mind. Two pictures sit side by side: a Rock who fathered them, and a God who gave them birth. The children they made forgot both.
The Hebrew word for "Rock" here is tzur, and it also carries the idea of forming and making. So the title says more than strength. One writer follows that link:
I think this word tzur is connected in sense with its root, tzur, which means to "form" or "make." So the One who orders all things is the security of His people, the One who orders His people. These senses seem bound together: forming, refuge, and salvation. So Peter says that believers should "entrust their souls to a faithful Creator." The word carries the security implied in "formed for Myself." And since this purpose of care is assured, there is also the "formed all things," with reference to that same purpose.
Forgetting Him is not a small slip of memory. It knocks away the only ground under your feet:
They had chosen to put the only stable, enduring Rock of salvation out of their minds. They chose to forget the eternal God who had proved a Father to them (v.18). Of course this could only lead to total confusion.
The forgetting in this verse did not follow hardship. It followed success — and that pattern is not unique to Israel:
Then the song turns from past to future, but which is seen as past, clear in the vision of God. Jeshurun grew fat and kicked. God's loved, upright one became rebellious in prosperity — a strange, common case. He gave up his Maker and thought little of the Rock of his salvation. Then the heart, now distant from Him, turned to His opposites. Strange gods came in, with their detestable practices. Newly invented gods replaced Him who had brought them forth. The same thing has been repeated again and again since, and in every form you can imagine.
Nothing stays empty. What replaced the Rock was not harmless, and pride in moving past the fathers made the swap easy:
This was not just worshipping material things. It was sacrificing to demons (v.17). Ignorant as they were of such "gods," they were ready to be taken in by them. They did not learn this from their fathers, so no doubt they felt they were advancing beyond the wisdom of their fathers. Such pride will make people easy victims of deception.
The birth language points to a relationship God Himself set up when He took one nation out of the middle of another. Israel ruined its side of it. God did not drop His:
He was the Rock who fathered them, their Father who had bought them (Deut. 32:6, 18). This was the gracious name the God of Israel took when He set out to take a nation from the middle of another nation. They would be His people, and He would be their God. But the nation had meanwhile corrupted itself... Still, the same mouth that testified to their self-corruption, and spoke fierce rebuke against their sin, defends their cause. It declares their eventual security and blessing as the nation of the Lord's salvation.
There is a mother's tenderness in "gave you birth." One writer ties the verse straight to the Lord's words in Matthew 23:
For the motherhood of GOD, see Deut. 32:18, and compare, of course, Matt. 23:37-39.
The song describes Israel, but one writer turns it on us. God's gifts can shut out the Giver:
There is a solemn voice in all this for the writer and the reader. We are each of us in danger of walking the moral path these words describe. Surrounded on all sides by the rich and varied mercies of God, we tend to use them to feed a spirit of self-satisfaction. We use the gifts to shut out the Giver... We forget God. We lose the sweet and precious sense of His presence and of His perfect sufficiency, and turn to other objects as Israel turned to false gods. How often we forget the Rock who fathered us, the God who formed us, the Lord who redeemed us!
- Rock means Maker. The title joins forming, refuge and salvation in one word — the God who shaped them is the God who secures them.
- Forgotten in plenty. The song locates the drift not in suffering but in comfort: prosperity made the upright one rebellious, "a strange, common case."
- Forgotten, then filled. Dropping the Rock left no empty, neutral space. It led to sacrifice to demons, and pride in outgrowing the fathers made deception easy.
- Forgotten by them, not by Him. He fathered the nation and bought it. The voice that rebukes their sin still promises their blessing in the end.
- Forgotten by us too. We can use God's gifts to shut out the Giver. The test: do today's mercies keep driving you back to the Rock who fathered you?
And Jehovah saw it, and despised them, Because of the provoking of his sons and of his daughters.
Moses is at the end of his life, teaching Israel a song God gave him as a witness against them before they ever failed. Verse 19 is where the song turns: God sees what His people have become and turns away, yet He still calls them His sons and His daughters.
The song came before the disaster, not after. Israel learned it by heart first, so the words were already waiting when the failure came.
So God provided a song for Israel, seen in the first 43 verses of chapter 32. Moses was to write it down for Israel to learn. God would bring them into the land. There they would grow well fed and wealthy, turn to idols, and provoke God. Then this song would testify against them. If they learned it by heart, they would remember it. Its words would at least embarrass them when they disobeyed. It is amazing how carefully God worked to impress their responsibility on Israel from every angle. And He knew full well that they would rebel.
The verse says God "saw it." Moses has just sung of God's love and patience, and of what Israel gave that love in return.
Then Moses sings of His wonderful love and goodness and patience to that people. He sings too of their falling into every kind of wickedness. They sacrificed even to demons — scornfully called "he-goats" — not to God, but "to gods they had never known, to new gods that had come recently, whom your fathers had never dreaded." "You were unmindful of the Rock that bore you, and you forgot the God who gave you birth."
God's reaction matches theirs. The rejection runs in both directions, but only one side of it is deserved.
When the Lord saw this rebellion, He spurned Israel. They had spurned Him without reason, now He spurns them with good reason. They receive themselves something of their own treatment. His face had been shining with pleasure on Israel. Now He hides His face from them, to see what their end will be. For if God's face does not shine with approval on His creatures, they cannot continue without serious consequences.
The verse calls them His sons and His daughters. No other nation stood that close, and closeness is what made the discipline so severe.
No nation on earth was ever called to pass through discipline as severe as Israel's. As the Lord reminds them in those solemn words, "You only have I known of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities." No other nation was ever called to the privileged place of a real relationship with Jehovah. God reserved this dignity for one nation. But that very dignity was the basis of a most solemn responsibility.
The song is not only Israel's history. The same path is open to us: good gifts crowding out the Giver.
We are, each of us, in danger of treading the moral path indicated by the words just quoted. God surrounds us on every side with rich and varied mercies. We are apt to use them to feed a spirit of self-satisfaction. We use the gifts to shut out the Giver. In a word, we, too, like Israel, grow fat and kick. We forget God. We lose the sweet and precious sense of His presence and of His perfect sufficiency. We turn to other things, as Israel turned to false gods.
Verse 19 is not where the song ends. The same threat that turns God away also carries His mercy at the end.
Without doubt this is the sure and solemn threat of God's displeasure. He turns from Israel to the Gentiles, as certainly as Israel used to turn from Jehovah to false gods. But God is carrying out that threat now, after the utmost patience. It was only carried out in full when they added to their old idolatry the still graver sin of rejecting the Messiah and scorning the gospel. That gospel offered them pardon for these and all other sins by His blood. And the threat itself contains just as sure an indication of restoring mercy in the end.
- Warned — Israel learned the song before the failure, so their own words would testify against them.
- Seen — God turned away because of what He saw: worship handed to gods Israel had never known.
- Spurned — they rejected Him without cause; He rejected them with cause, and He hid His approving face.
- Family — He calls them sons and daughters even while rejecting them. That nearness is why the discipline was so severe.
- Restored — the same threat that scattered them carries within it the promise of mercy at the end.
And he said, I will hide my face from them, I will see what their end shall be; For they are a perverse generation, Children in whom is no faithfulness.
The Song of Moses looks back over Israel's whole history and forward to its end. Here God Himself speaks. He will turn His face away and wait to see where such a people will land. Two questions follow: what does it mean for God to hide His face, and who is this "generation" He describes?
One writer describes how much ground the Song covers:
It covers the whole range of God's dealings with Israel from first to last. It gives a very solemn record of their terrible sin, and of God's wrath and judgement. But, praise God, it begins and ends with Him. This is full of the deepest and richest blessing for the soul.
God hiding His face is an answer to what Israel had just done to Him:
When the Lord saw this rebellion, He rejected Israel. They had rejected Him for no reason; now He rejects them with good reason (v.19). They get back something of their own treatment. His face had been shining on Israel with pleasure. Now He hides His face from them, to see what their end will be (v.20). If God's face does not shine with approval on His creatures, they cannot go on without serious consequences.
The word "generation" here is not a measure of time. One writer compares how the Psalms use the word:
The meaning here is moral rather than a matter of dates... So in Deuteronomy 32:5, 20 we find generation used in the same way. It does not mark off a period of time; it expresses the moral character of Israel. In the Psalms we also have "the generation to come," which is not limited to a mere thirty or a hundred years.
One consequence of that reading stands out. The people described here did not disappear with the crowd Moses spoke to.
"This generation" is the perverse and unbelieving generation of the Jews. Even today they remain a race separate from all others. They live among the nations, but they always remain a separate people, kept for the fulfilment of the counsels of God.
The verse ends by calling them children with no faithfulness in them. Older translations read "children in whom is no faith." One writer applies that line to the people who accused Moses and Aaron:
God had displayed His power in judgment right in front of them. Yet they stubbornly refused to see His hand in it. They accused Moses and Aaron, as if these two had done it by some hidden power. They either could not, or would not, see the act of God. Truly they were "children in whom is no faith" (Deut. 32:20).
God's turning away from Israel is a real threat. But one writer finds something else inside that threat:
It is the sure and solemn threat of God's displeasure in turning from Israel to the Gentiles, as surely as Israel used to turn from the Lord to false gods. That threat is now being carried out, after the greatest patience. It was only fully carried out when they added a still graver sin to their old idolatry: they rejected the Messiah and refused the gospel that offered them pardon of these and all other sins by His blood. Yet the threat itself contains the no less sure sign of restoring mercy in the end.
One writer turns the lesson on readers who have received more, not less:
The higher our privileges, the richer our blessings, the nearer our relationship, the more fitting it is for us to be faithful. We are bound to it all the more solemnly. In everything we should seek to live in a way that pleases Him. He is the One who has called us into the very highest and most blessed place that even His perfect love could give.
- Cause — Israel turned from God first. The hidden face is His answer in kind. No creature can go on without His approving face.
- Character — "Generation" here describes a moral kind, not a span of years. It says what a people are like, not when they lived.
- Continuance — On that reading, the same unbelieving people live on among the nations today. God keeps them for His own purposes.
- Consequence — The turning away opens the door to the Gentiles. The threat itself carries the certainty of mercy for Israel at the end.
- Caution — The Song begins and ends with God. The greater a reader's privileges, the greater the reason to walk humbly.
They have moved me to jealousy with that which is no God; They have exasperated me with their vanities; And I will move them to jealousy with that which is not a people; With a foolish nation will I provoke them to anger.
Near the end of his life, Moses teaches Israel a song about their coming failure. In it God answers their sin in kind: they chose what is "no god", so He turns to what is "no people".
Israel gave up the living God for gods that do not exist. In return God turns to a people Israel treated as no one.
God could not forget, as a man would; but He could hide His face, and He had to. They had given Him up for gods that were not, and He would move them to jealousy by a people they disdained as none. It is here that the apostle sees the calling of the Gentiles (Rom. 10:19).
God picks the punishment for its sting. He lifts up the very people Israel looked down on, and gives them the upper hand.
They had provoked God to jealousy by trusting false gods and idols. So God would provoke them to jealousy by means of a foreign nation (v.21). He would use those Israel despised to discipline them. That nation would gain so much power over Israel that Israel would become jealous of it.
There is a painful reversal here. The people chosen to speak for God became the people the song speaks against.
Instead of Israel being a witness for Jehovah, before all nations, the song of Moses was to be a witness for Jehovah against the children of Israel. They were called to be His witnesses. Their task was to make His Name known and to display His praise in the land where He brought them, in His faithfulness and sovereign mercy. But sadly, they failed completely and shamefully.
Who are the "no people"? Commentators point to the Gentiles — the nations outside Israel.
But Jeshurun (Israel) grew fat and kicked, and abandoned the Rock of his strength. So God makes them jealous with those who are not a people. It is the call of the Gentiles, according to Romans 10:19.
Paul quotes this line in Romans to close off every escape route. The wording itself makes the Jewish reader choose between two uncomfortable admissions.
How could the Jews say that this meant themselves? On the contrary, it was the Jew who was provoked by the Gentiles — "By those who are no people, and by a foolish nation I will make you angry." Did they deny that they were a foolish nation? Very well then — Moses said it was a foolish nation that would make them angry.
Why does God stir jealousy instead of simply ending the nation?
In the meantime God uses Israel's fall as the occasion for proclaiming salvation to the Gentiles. And if God proclaims salvation to the Gentiles, it is not only that the Gentiles may be blessed, but that through their blessing Israel may be provoked to jealousy and again turn to God.
The threat is severe. But it carries its own remedy inside it.
The threat is being carried out now, after the greatest patience. It was carried out only when they added to their old idolatry a still graver sin: rejecting the Messiah and refusing the gospel that offered them pardon for these and all other sins by His blood. Yet the threat itself contains an equally sure hint of restoring mercy at the end. For certainly, the One who acts to make them jealous by blessing the Gentiles does not mean to cast them off in the end — quite the reverse.
The same jealousy stirs today. Believers can mix the worship of God with what belongs to demons.
And they are asked a conscience-searching question: "Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy?" Is He not rightly jealous of our giving any honour (honour that belongs to Him) to demons? Or, "are we stronger than He?" Do we think we are strong enough to take part in such mixtures without danger? God Himself is completely separate from them.
- Cause. Israel traded the living God for gods that were not — the offence that sets the whole sentence in motion.
- Mirror. God's answer matches the crime: the nothing they chose is repaid with a people they thought were nothing.
- Witness. The people called to testify for God became the people His song testifies against.
- Reach. That "no people" is the calling of the nations, which Paul uses in Romans to silence every Jewish objection.
- Return. The jealousy is not rejection but pursuit — the threat itself carries the promise of mercy at the end.
For a fire is kindled in mine anger, And it shall burn into the lowest Sheol, And shall consume the earth and its produce, And set fire to the foundations of the mountains.
Moses is singing a song God gave him before Israel ever entered the land, and by this point in it corruption has spread through the people and God answers. His answer is a fire that burns down into Sheol, out across the land, and into the roots of the mountains.
So who is this fire aimed at? One writer answers those who read a hint of mercy into it, and names who stands in front of the flame.
But doesn't Scripture say that the fire of God's wrath burns to the depths of Sheol, devours the earth and its increase, and sets on fire the foundations of the mountains? Yes, it does. But it is His wrath that does this, and the passage holds no hint of mercy. And it is not threatened against Israel's enemies. It is threatened against Israel themselves.
Israel's nearness to God is what makes the words so heavy.
No other nation was ever called to hold such a privileged place: a real relationship with Jehovah. God kept this dignity for one nation. But that very dignity was the ground of a most solemn responsibility. If they were called to be His people, they had to live in a way worthy of such a wonderful position. If not, they would go through the heaviest discipline any nation on earth has ever known. Men may reason about all this. They may ask whether it is morally consistent for a good God to act on the terms set out in verses 22-25 of this chapter. But sooner or later all such questions and reasonings turn out to be complete folly.
The fire burns to the depths of Sheol — the unseen world of the dead. Older translations read "the lowest hell." One writer explains what "lowest" means there.
The word Sheol is vague in Scripture (see Genesis 42:38; 44:29, 31). It comes into sight at the grave, and beyond that all is dark and silent... Yet we have "the lowest hell," where "lowest" means the lowest part. Deuteronomy 32:22 uses the same word as "the lower parts" of the earth, only in the singular.
God's anger reaches down into Sheol itself. That tells us something about what Sheol is.
Then we have expressions like the "depths of Sheol" (Prov. 9:18) and "the lowest Sheol" (Ps. 86:13; Deut. 32:22) — the last of these being the passage where God's wrath burns down to it — and "though they dig into Sheol" (Amos 9:2). These show that the grave cannot be the whole story. Even in Sheol (Ps. 139:8) there is no escape from the presence of God: "If I make my bed in Sheol, you are there!" Can that be nothing at all?
The verse is more than a picture of national disaster. One writer marks it as a first in the Bible.
Here we meet the first mention in Scripture of the fire of hell. The picture shows it burning down to the regions of the dead, and down to the very foundations of this natural order — as if that order were the source of the corruption that had come on His people.
Fire in Scripture is not a random weapon. It stands for something in God's nature that must act.
Fire is the constant symbol of wrath and judgment — not wrath that is arbitrary, but wrath that is necessary and essential... As fire, it must burn up everything that does not stand its test. So God must consume in judgment everything that is opposed to His righteous and perfect will.
One writer explains why the ground itself suffers for what people have done.
And while the earth will in the end be burned up in this way, Scripture links that with the judgment of ungodly men (2 Peter 3:7). The earth was made subject to futility because it was made subject to man (Rom. 8:20), not because man was made subject to the earth. So it is set free when the sons of God are revealed.
Another writer takes the mountains in the last line as more than geology.
The fire of God's anger would burn down to the depths of Sheol and consume the land and everything it produced (v.22). It would also set the foundation of the mountains on fire. The mountains picture high authorities, and the very foundations of that authority in Israel would suffer the destroying flame.
The fire is real, but it is not where the song ends.
The song of Moses (Deut. 32 and Rev. 15:3) is a wonderful summary of God's ways with Israel. It gives God's sovereign call of that nation, their stubborn ways, and, as a result, their defeat by enemies and their scattering. It then gives the final overthrow of those enemies, and the recovery of both land and people through sovereign mercy, so that they enjoy the favour of Jehovah together with the nations that are spared.
- Cause. The fire is kindled — a response, not a mood. Corruption in the one nation God drew near to Himself lit it.
- Downward. It burns to the depths of Sheol, the lowest part of the unseen world. So the grave is not the whole story, and no place lies beyond God's reach.
- Outward. The same fire spreads to the land and to the foundations of the mountains. One writer reads those mountains as Israel's high authorities, burning at the base.
- First. Here Scripture first names the fire of hell. One flame reaches the regions of the dead and the foundations of the natural order together.
- After. The same song that lights the fire ends in mercy: scattering first, then the overthrow of Israel's enemies and the recovery of land and people.
I will heap mischiefs upon them; Mine arrows will I spend against them.
God had Moses write this song as a witness against Israel, not as praise for it. Here the voice in the song is God's own, so why does He speak this way about His own nation, and how far will He go?
This threat is not a sudden outburst. It belongs to a song Moses wrote before Israel entered the land, and God set its purpose in advance.
How moving and solemn all this is! Israel should have been a witness for Jehovah before all nations. Instead, the song of Moses was to stand as a witness for Jehovah against the children of Israel. They were called to be His witnesses. They were responsible to declare His Name and to show His praise in the land He brought them into, in His faithfulness and sovereign mercy. But they failed completely and shamefully. So, in view of this sad and humbling failure, a song was to be written. First, it sets out the glory of God in the most magnificent language. Second, it records Israel's terrible failure at every stage of their history, and records it with unbending faithfulness.
Why arrows? The picture is drawn from an everyday weapon, and the Bible uses it in more than one way.
The arrow was used with the bow, a common weapon of the ancients... Arrows picture the judgements of God, Ps. 38:2; Ps. 45:5. They also picture anything sharp and painful, such as a wounding tongue. Jer. 9:8.
What makes this so painful is the target. God aims these arrows at Israel, not at her enemies — though the enemies have their own reckoning coming.
Jehovah then has to prepare arrows against His people. He has to pour out His vengeance even on His loved Israel — more guilty than any other. Then the nations take advantage of God's anger against His people, until at last, in mercy to Israel, He rises up to deal with their enemies.
The verses that follow unpack the "heap" into specific troubles. They come from every direction at once.
Disasters of many kinds would be heaped upon them. God's arrows of penetrating judgment would torment them. They would be wasted with hunger and devoured by pestilence and bitter destruction. But also God would send wild beasts to attack them, and poisonous reptiles (v.24). Enemies from outside would attack with their swords, and inside young and old together would be huddled in terror (v.25).
Many readers stumble here. How can a good God speak like this? Israel's closeness to God is what made her discipline so heavy.
No nation on earth has ever been called to pass through discipline as severe as Israel's... No other nation was ever called to hold the privileged place of a real relationship with Jehovah. God kept this dignity for one nation alone. But that very dignity was the ground of a most solemn responsibility. If they were called to be His people, they had to live in a way worthy of such a wonderful position. If they did not, they would undergo the heaviest chastenings any nation under the sun has ever borne. Men may reason about all this. They may ask how a kind Being can act on the terms set out in verses 22-25 of our chapter and still be morally consistent. But sooner or later all such questions and reasonings prove to be complete folly.
The arrows are spent, but not the nation. A few verses on, God gives His reason for stopping short of wiping them out. It concerns His own honour.
It would have been just for God to say He would dash them in pieces and destroy their very memory from among men (v.26). But He would not go that far. Otherwise Israel's enemies would boast that their own strength had destroyed Israel, and would give the Lord no honour for His hand in this (v.27).
The arrows of this verse turn up again in Israel's own prayers. They appear not as a complaint against God, but as an admission that He was right.
They justify Him in His past dealings with themselves. It was He who had heaped disasters on them. They had been pierced through with His arrows (Deut. 32:23). So they can appeal to His name against the anger of the enemy. That enemy was making himself great against that name by oppressing the poor of His covenant. The enemy would gladly use them for his own pleasure; but God had other thoughts. He had appointed the oppressors as a rod of correction for His own people.
- Witness — God gave the song ahead of time, so when trouble came Israel could not say they were never warned. The people meant to witness for God became the subject of His witness against them.
- Arrows — Arrows stand for God's judgements, and here they fly at His own nation, not at her enemies.
- Heap — One word unfolds into famine, plague, wild beasts, the sword outside and terror inside. It spares neither young nor old.
- Dignity — Israel was nearer to God than any nation, so her discipline was heavier than any nation's. Privilege raises responsibility; it never lowers it.
- Limit — The arrows were spent, but the nation survived. God would not let an enemy claim the credit, so His care for His own honour became Israel's safety.
They shall be consumed with hunger, and devoured with burning heat, And with poisonous pestilence; And the teeth of beasts will I send against them, With the poison of what crawleth in the dust.
This verse sits inside a song Moses wrote before Israel ever entered the land. The song names the disasters that would follow if the people turned to idols. Hunger, plague, wild animals and venom all serve as tools in God's hand. That raises the hardest question in the chapter: how can such severity come from the God who chose this people?
Moses wrote this song at the very end of his life. God told him to teach it to the people and keep it in their mouths:
Moses wrote the second song at the end, just before he died. There is no record that it was ever sung. The instruction was, "Now therefore write this song for you, and teach it to the children of Israel: put it in their mouths, that this song may be a witness for Me against the children of Israel" (Deut. 31:19)... They were unlikely to sing it. The earlier part celebrates God's kind dealings with them, and the closing part celebrates His final intervention and deliverance. But the main weight of the song is their folly in abandoning God for idols, and the discipline and punishment this was certain to bring on them.
The four blows named here fall in a sequence, and they close in from every side:
Disasters of many kinds would be heaped upon them. God's arrows of penetrating judgment would torment them. They would be wasted with hunger and devoured by pestilence and bitter destruction. But also God would send wild beasts to attack them, and poisonous reptiles (v.24).
Snake venom also carries a set meaning across Scripture:
Scripture uses the poison of snakes and asps as a symbol of God's judgment and of the malice that lives in the wicked. Deut. 32:24, 33; Job 6:4; Job 20:16; Ps. 58:4; Ps. 140:3; Rom. 3:13.
A rare word from this verse turns up again in the prophet Micah:
"They shall lick the dust like the serpent, they shall move out of their holes like creeping things of the earth," Micah 7:17. But we have here, not only a reference to Gen. 3:14, but a quotation of certain words found Deut. 32:24. The Hebrew word for "creeping things" occurs only here, in Deut. and in Job 32:6.
People stumble here and ask how a good God could speak this way. One writer answers that Israel's nearness to God is what made the discipline so heavy:
No nation on earth has ever been called to pass through such severe discipline as Israel. The Lord reminds them with these solemn words: "You only have I known of all the families of the earth, therefore will I punish you for your iniquities." No other nation was ever called to hold that privileged place of real relationship with God... but that very honour was the ground of a most solemn responsibility... People may argue about all this. They may raise all kinds of questions about whether a good God can act on the terms set out in verses 22-25 of this chapter. But sooner or later all such questions and arguments prove to be complete folly.
The judgments are not the last word in the chapter:
But Moses does not end without a song (Deut. 32). This song rests on the hidden things of God's grace, though it also takes in the judgments of the last days. He is not blind to the evil, yet he looks on to the blessing that would come to them. He feels deeply what they would do against God in their stubborn folly and ingratitude. But he also sees, in prophetic vision, what He will do for them.
Israel's history still speaks to readers now:
It is true that we possess eternal life... But does that excuse us from hearing the warning that Israel's history speaks in our ears? Are our far greater privileges a reason to live carelessly and brush aside the healthy warnings Israel's history gives? Certainly not!... The higher our privileges, the richer our blessings, the closer our relationship, the more fitting it is — and the more solemnly we are bound — to be faithful.
- Written first. Moses put this song in Israel's mouth before the failure came, so it would stand as a witness against them when it did.
- Nearness costs. Israel's closeness to God was the very reason her discipline was heavier than any other nation's.
- Four arrows. Hunger, plague, wild beasts and venom all strike at once. In Scripture, poison stands for God's judgment.
- Words that carried. A rare phrase from this verse reappears in Micah, showing the prophets read and reused Moses' song.
- Grace beneath. The judgments are real, yet the song rests on God's grace. It looks on to the blessing He will bring, and it still calls us to walk faithfully.
From without shall the sword bereave them, and in the chambers, terror -- Both the young man and the virgin, The suckling with the man of gray hairs.
Moses ends his life by teaching Israel a song about their own future, and this line is its darkest point: no one in the house is spared, from the nursing baby to the grey-haired man. Why would God speak this way about the people He chose, and do such words leave any hope open?
This verse predicts a disaster; it does not report one. Moses was told in advance what the people would do, and told to put the warning into a song they could not lose.
It is in view of all this that Moses is told to write this song. Of it we read: "when many evils and troubles have come upon them, this song shall confront them as a witness, for it will live unforgotten in the mouths of their offspring." In this song Moses pleads with the people about the sins he foretells they will commit. He faithfully predicts the disasters that will follow.
One writer places this line at the end of a list of blows falling on the nation.
God's arrows of penetrating judgment would torment them. They would be wasted with hunger and devoured by disease and bitter destruction. But God would also send wild beasts to attack them, and poisonous reptiles (v.24). Enemies from outside would attack with their swords, and inside, young and old would huddle together in terror (v.25).
Sword, famine, plague and fear look like separate misfortunes with separate causes.
The term "fire" stands for the concentrated energy of the dissolving forces of nature. It is a rapid consumer of created forms. But this devouring energy also works in slower ways. It is more or less resisted, and for a while held off. And yet Scripture groups every form in which human lives are blighted and destroyed under this one head. It traces them all to one agency. "Our God is a consuming fire." And so we read verses 23-25.
One writer's answer is that being chosen is what brought the discipline.
No nation on earth has ever been called to pass through such severe discipline as Israel. The Lord reminds them of this in solemn words: "You only have I known of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities." No other nation was ever called to the privileged place of actual relationship with Jehovah. God reserved this dignity for one nation; but that very dignity was the basis of a most solemn responsibility. If they were called to be His people, they were responsible to live in a way worthy of such a wonderful position, or else undergo the heaviest chastenings ever endured by any nation under the sun.
The next verses show the judgment stopping short.
It would have been just for God to say He would dash them in pieces and destroy their very memory from among men (v.26). But He would not go that far. If He did, Israel's enemies would boast of their own strength in destroying Israel, and would give the Lord no honour for His hand in this (v.27).
Another writer asks whether these troubles ever end.
But is there to be no end to these calamities? Yes, there is an end. It comes by Israel's deliverance when they are at their last extremity, and by God transferring the judgments of His hand from them to their adversaries. Whatever partial restorations of Israel there may have been in the past, this complete transfer of God's judgments from them to their adversaries has never yet taken place.
It is easy to file this under someone else's ancient history. One writer argues the opposite: greater blessing raises the stakes.
Our privileges are far higher. Does that mean we may walk carelessly and despise the wholesome warnings that Israel's history gives us? God forbid! The higher our privileges, the richer our blessings, the nearer our relationship, the more fitting it is that we be faithful. We are bound to it all the more solemnly.
- Witness first. Moses wrote the song before the trouble came. When the evils arrived, it would confront the nation as a witness they could not forget.
- Sword and terror. Enemies strike from outside while young and old huddle in fear inside. No room in the house is safe.
- One fire. Arrows, hunger, disease, beasts and the sword all trace back to one agency: "our God is a consuming fire."
- Privilege priced. God disciplined Israel more severely than any nation, because He brought no other nation so near. That nearness itself created the responsibility.
- Turned back. God would have ended their memory among men. He held back so Israel's enemies could not claim the credit, and in the end His judgments pass from Israel to her enemies.
I would say, I will scatter, I will make the remembrance of them to cease from among men,
God says here what He could have done to Israel: scatter them and leave no memory of them among people. He announces the sentence, then pulls it back — so what stopped Him?
(Some older translations read, "I said, I would scatter them into corners." The writers quoted below use that wording.)
God told Moses to write this song down and teach it to the people before any of the failure had happened. One writer describes what kind of song it is:
Two songs are attributed to Moses. The second was composed at the end, just before he died. It does not appear ever to have been sung. The instructions were: "Now therefore write this song and teach it to the people of Israel. Put it in their mouths, that this song may be a witness for Me against the people of Israel." They would hardly be likely to sing it. The earlier part celebrates God's kindly dealings with them, and the closing part His final intervention and deliverance. But the main burden of it is their folly in forsaking God and turning to idols, and the chastening and retribution this was sure to bring on them.
This sentence would not have been harsh. The people deserved it, and the next verse gives the reason God held back:
It would have been just for God to say He would dash them in pieces and destroy their very memory from among men (v. 26). But He would not go that far. Otherwise Israel's enemies would boast of their own strength in destroying Israel, and give the Lord no honour for His hand in this (v. 27).
The restraint does not come from anything found in Israel. God weighs what the surrounding nations would make of their disappearance:
And why did He not? The answer to this question is a truth of infinite value and importance to Israel. It lies at the very foundation of all their future blessing. No doubt, as far as they are concerned, they deserved to have their remembrance blotted out from among men. But God has His own thoughts, counsels and purposes for them. And not only that: He takes account of what the nations think and do toward His people.
Another writer puts the same restraint in one line:
Still, the judgment falls on Israel. God would have destroyed them, if the glory of His name had not held Him back, for the Gentiles proved themselves completely wicked.
If Israel had vanished, the watching world would have drawn the wrong conclusion. It would have said their God was beaten. One writer connects this verse to an earlier moment:
When He spoke of destroying the people in the desert for refusing to go up into the promised land, Moses pleaded against it. He pointed to the disastrous effect such a thing would have on His name among the nations of the earth. They would say that He had destroyed the nation because He was unable to bring them into the land (Numbers 14)… He will not act in a way that would give His creature a false impression. That would only increase the darkness in which that creature walks.
God used the nations to discipline Israel. He did not hand them a free licence:
God will not permit the nations to treat His poor erring people as they please. He will use them as His rod of discipline. But the moment they indulge their own bitter hatred and go beyond their appointed limit, He will break the rod in pieces. He will make it clear to all that He Himself is dealing with His beloved though erring people, for their final blessing and His glory.
The threat of being forgotten was real. Other peoples of that world did vanish:
After all their unmatched ups and downs, and heavy discipline under the holy hand of God, they remain. They have come through all the hatred and persecution of the boastful nations, east and west. Where is Moab? Where are Edom, Assyria, Babylon, and the rest? Men may dig and find the ruins of their palaces and fortresses. But as nations they are dead and gone. They have long ceased to exist. Israel remains as distinct a people as ever.
The song does not stop with the sentence God withheld:
In the end the Lord will judge His people, and will change His mind concerning His servants. He will call the nations to rejoice with them. Jehovah will be merciful to His land and to His people.
- Deserved. Israel earned erasure. The commentators do not soften it: the sentence was just.
- Withheld. What stopped it was the glory of God's name, not anything found in the people.
- Truthful. God refuses to act in a way that would let His creatures draw a false conclusion about Him.
- Limited. The nations serve as His rod of discipline, and when they exceed their limit He breaks the rod.
- Remembered. Moab, Edom, Assyria and Babylon are gone; Israel remains, and the song closes with mercy, not erasure.