When thou dost lend thy brother anything, thou shalt not go into his house to secure his pledge.
God gives Israel a rule for the moment one neighbour lends to another and asks for security. The lender must wait outside while the borrower brings the pledge out to him. This small courtesy carries great moral weight.
A pledge was an item handed over to guarantee a loan. The law did not abolish the custom. It fenced it in.
Morrish Bible DictionaryPeople took articles as security for loans and similar deals from very early times. God's law set restrictions on the practice, so that no one could take unfair advantage through it.
The lender has a real claim. What he does not have is the run of another man's house. Keeping him at the door decides who chooses the pledge. That one detail changes everything.
Leslie M. GrantIf one loaned money to another, he must not enter the house of his debtor to take a pledge of repayment, but allow the debtor to bring this out to him. The reason is evident, for the creditor might see something in the house that he would prefer to have and demand this as a pledge. […] But this law would protect the debtor from the tyranny of his creditor.
Another writer puts the same restraint in a single word — the creditor is not to force his way in:
Numerical Bible NotesThe pledge is again limited: the creditor must not intrude upon the debtor's house for it.
The verses just before set a second limit. A millstone ground the family's daily grain. Take it, and the debt can never be repaid.
Leslie M. GrantThe law of verse 6 also is one of consideration for people's need. […] But the creditor must not take the upper or lower millstone of the other as a pledge, for this would deprive the debtor of the means of doing his normal work. In fact, this would hinder his ability to repay his debt, as the creditor should realize, but worse than this, it would be disobedience to God.
This rule does more than settle a money matter. It trains the person who keeps it, and it holds back the person who would rather not.
J. N. DarbyThe spirit of all these ordinances is very instructive. So is the goodness and tenderness of God, who stoops to take notice of all these things. He teaches His people delicacy, propriety, consideration for others, and sensitivity. These feelings remove brutality and soften the hardness of man's heart. They shape his ways according to that love which the Spirit of God clothes Himself with when He acts in the heart of man. […] But the law of God assigns limits and conditions. These keep in check the wickedness of that will which hardens itself while it oppresses others.
Doorsteps, loans and millstones are not too small for God's notice.
William KellyAgain we find in the rest of Deuteronomy 24, as well as in Deuteronomy 25, many precepts of mercy and goodness towards the people, even in the most ordinary matters of household life. […] The Lord finds His own interest in all the belongings of His people. He would train them up in His own nurture and admonition — an important point for us to consider in good time.
Israel might not have seen the point of a rule about a doorway.
Leslie M. GrantGod's laws were not arbitrary demands. They were for the greatest good of His people Israel, whether they realized it or not.
The same care belongs in lending between Christians today.
Leslie M. GrantChristians too should consider it wise not to charge interest to another Christian or to a close relative if lending to them because of a need. Business practices such as mortgages are of a different character, of course. But the Lord takes account of the unselfish treatment we show toward others, and will repay this in His own way.
The searching question is simple. Do we press our claims further than God presses His against us?
C. H. MackintoshAre you dealing in grace with your enemies and those who are in your debt? Are you demanding your rights? Are you, in principle, taking your fellow by the throat and saying, "Pay me what you owe"? If so, you are not "perfect as your Father." He is dealing in grace, and you are dealing in righteousness.
- Claim. The law lets the lender ask for security. It refuses him the right to help himself.
- Limit. He waits outside, so the borrower chooses the pledge. And no one may take a millstone, which grinds the family's daily bread.
- Protection. The limits shield the weaker man from the stronger man's tyranny. They also keep a hard will from oppressing others.
- Training. Small household rules train God's people in delicacy and care. Home life is never too small for Him.
- Echo. The same spirit still stands: lend without pressing for gain. Never take by the throat someone who owes you.
Thou shalt stand outside, and the man to whom thou hast made a loan shall bring out the pledge to thee without.
The lender waits at the door. The borrower chooses what to hand over. It is a small rule about a doorstep, yet it raises a big question. Why does God put into national law the way a lender collects his security?
Taking an item as security for a loan was an old and ordinary practice. The law did not invent it; it set limits on it.
Morrish Bible DictionaryPeople took articles as security for loans and similar debts from very early times. The law gave restrictions so that no one could take unfair advantage through it. Exodus 22:26; Deuteronomy 24:10-17; Job 22:6; Job 24:3, 9; Amos 2:8.
The debt is real, and the lender has a genuine claim. But once he steps inside, he picks what to take. A poor man's house is full of things a lender might want.
Leslie M. GrantIf one man loaned money to another, he must not enter the house of his debtor to take a pledge of repayment. He must let the debtor bring it out to him. The reason is obvious. The creditor might see something in the house that he would prefer to have, and demand it as a pledge. If the debtor brought out a pledge that was fair, the creditor could of course refuse it and ask for a fairer one. But this law would protect the debtor from the tyranny of his creditor.
The law does not cancel the debt or forbid a pledge. It moves the choice from the stronger man to the weaker one, and leaves the poor man's house his own.
The laws around this verse follow a pattern. God allows something, then draws a line around it.
Numerical Bible NotesThese two laws look once more at the poor, whether as debtor or as creditor. First, the pledge is again limited. The creditor must not intrude into the debtor's house to get it. And if it is something the debtor can spare only for the day, he must return it by nightfall. On the other hand, no one must hold back the labourer's wages, or he will cry to the Lord about it, and the Lord will treat it as sin.
These rules do more than settle disputes. God is training how His people feel about others.
J. N. DarbyThe spirit of all these ordinances is very instructive. So is the goodness and tenderness of God, who stoops to take notice of all these things. He teaches His people sensitivity, decency, consideration for others, and tender feeling. Such feelings remove brutality and soften the hardness of man's heart. They shape his ways according to that love which the Spirit of God puts on when He works in the human heart.
This care is not limited to lenders and debtors. It reaches every corner of ordinary life, and even sets a limit on how a guilty man may be punished.
William KellyAgain, in the rest of Deuteronomy 24 and in Deuteronomy 25, we find many rules of mercy and goodness toward the people, even in the most ordinary matters of household life. They cover not only the wife, but one's fellows, servants too, strangers, harvests and vineyards, down to the care of the cattle. The poor man who was at fault and got a beating was not forgotten. The punishment must not go past a set measure, and nothing must make one's brother despised. A beating may be due and needed. But nothing must destroy respect. Jehovah finds His own interest in all the belongings of His people. He would bring them up with His own care and correction. That is an important point for us to consider early.
The reason behind these laws is not cold fairness. Israel had once been poor and helpless themselves, and that memory was to shape how they treated the poor.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThe laws found in verses 10-15 are merciful ones. If people obeyed these laws, they would settle so many questions and end so much injustice. See also James 5:4. They were to show mercy to the poor, remembering their own former condition in Egypt.
- Debt stands. The loan is valid and the lender may take a pledge. God limits the practice; He does not cancel it.
- Door holds. The creditor stays outside, so the stronger man cannot pick over the poor man's things.
- Choice shifts. The debtor brings out the item. This guards him from the tyranny of his creditor, and the lender may still ask for a fairer one.
- Feeling forms. Through rules like this God teaches His people to be considerate and sensitive, and softens hard hearts.
- Memory drives. Israel owed mercy to the poor, remembering their own former condition in Egypt.
And if the man be needy, thou shalt not lie down with his pledge;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
in any case thou shalt return him the pledge at the going down of the sun, that he may sleep in his own upper garment and bless thee; and it shall be righteousness unto thee before Jehovah thy God.
Deuteronomy 24:13 closes a short law about lending: hold a poor neighbour's cloak as security, and you must hand it back before dark. The verse ties three things together — his sleep, his blessing on you, and a righteousness God Himself counts.
The pledge in view was not a spare possession.
Morrish Bible DictionaryThe other main garment was the simlah, a cloak or wide outer mantle, worn by men and women, and the one they wrapped themselves in at night. It might be of any material, depending on the season and on the wearer's position in life. If someone took this garment in pledge, he had to return it in the evening, for without it "in what else shall he sleep?"
Take it away overnight and the loss is not inconvenience but exposure.
J Wilson SmithThe sun has gone down. The chill of midnight creeps over his sleeping form, his needed rest is disturbed, and his health is endangered. His skin needs a covering and warmth from outside. Now where can he find this if the garment is pledged and kept? Nowhere.
The law does not cancel the debt or forbid security. It limits the creditor on two sides: how he takes the pledge, and how long he keeps it.
Numerical Bible NotesThe pledge is again limited: the creditor must not force his way into the debtor's house to get it. And if it is something the debtor can spare only for the day, the creditor must return it by nightfall.
One writer, commenting on the same rule in Exodus, names the principle behind it.
L. M. GrantIf a borrower gave his garment as security, the lender must not keep it even overnight. My righteous demands must in no way take priority over proper compassion.
The verse promises the lender something: the debtor will bless him. One writer notes what else such kindness gains.
Leslie M. GrantGiving the pledge back for the night was proper consideration, and by it the friendship of another is gained.
The closing clause sounds strange to modern ears — mercy counted as righteousness. Yet that is how Scripture speaks about giving to the poor.
Morrish Bible DictionaryGiving to the poor was a righteous thing to do, and so it is called righteousness. The law made provision for the poor. It says that there would always be poor people in the land. If no one relieved them and they cried to the Lord, it would be counted a sin against those who should have helped them.
And what looks like money lost is, in God's reckoning, money placed with the safest borrower there is.
William Kelly"Whoever is generous to the poor lends to the LORD," as He is pleased to count it, "and he will repay him for his deed." What security can match this? Think too of the honour of being creditor to Him!
One writer links Jesus' words about a lawsuit over clothing back to this rule.
Arend Remmers"And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well." Here we see that the Lord does not allow different rules for public life and for private life. The law forbade keeping a poor debtor's cloak overnight as a pledge. The debtor had to get his cloak back so that he might have a covering for the night (Ex. 22:26; Deut. 24:12–13). This is probably what the Lord Jesus was referring to. He tells His disciples not to resist, and to give even more than what is demanded. This is grace.
Notice what God makes a law about here: what a poor man sleeps under at night.
J Wilson SmithTouches like this remind us how detailed God's regard is. They show how deep His gracious consideration is for the small things of our life.
- Cloak. The pledge was the poor man's only covering — his coat by day, his blanket by night. Keeping it overnight put his rest and his health at risk.
- Limit. A creditor kept his rights but lost his leverage. He could not force his way into the house, and he could not keep what the debtor needs at night.
- Compassion. Fair claims never outrank mercy. The returned cloak guards a man's body and wins his friendship.
- Blessing. The debtor's blessing is the lender's return. Scripture treats kindness to the poor as a loan made to God Himself, and He repays it.
- Righteousness. God counts such mercy as righteousness before Him. Jesus goes past the rule's minimum into grace: give more than is demanded.
Thou shalt not oppress a hired servant [who is] poor and needy of thy brethren, or of thy sojourners who are in thy land within thy gates
Deuteronomy 24 is full of everyday rules for ordinary life. This one steps into the deal between an employer and a day labourer, protects the weaker man in it, and raises a question: why does God write wage policy into His law?
The "hired worker" here was not a household slave, and the difference matters:
Morrish Bible DictionaryThese hired servants were different from the house servants, who were generally slaves. An employer took on a hired servant by the day and paid him at the close of the day. A servant hired by the priest did not count as one of the family and could not eat the holy things. The slaves, by contrast, did count as part of the family.
The rule guards the outsider as much as the Israelite, and the same standard reaches into the New Testament:
Leslie M. GrantNo one was to oppress a hired servant, whether an Israelite or a Gentile. If he was poor, he should get his wages every day (vv. 14-15). This is only right, for when the work is done, the pay is due. The New Testament tells masters to treat their servants "justly and fairly" (Colossians 4:1).
The same law appears again in Leviticus 19:13. One writer marvels that God notices a single night's delay:
C. H. Mackintosh"You shall not oppress your neighbour or rob him. The wages of a hired worker shall not remain with you all night until the morning." What tender care is here! The High and Mighty One who lives in eternity can notice the thoughts and feelings that rise in the heart of a poor labourer. He knows and takes into account what such a man expects from the fruit of his day's work. Of course he looks for his wages. The labourer's heart counts on them; the family meal depends on them. Oh, do not hold them back! Do not send the labourer home with a heavy heart, to make the heart of his wife and children heavy too.
One writer turns to rich employers who held back the pay of the men who reaped their fields. The unpaid debt itself becomes a voice:
William KellyThey are charged with deliberate cruelty and fraud in their dealings with the labourers who reaped their fields. Their very wealth tempts the rich to hold back wages from the poor. Only their own affairs matter to them. They put off the claims of people who live from hand to mouth until it suits them. But the debt cries aloud to Him who always feels for the poor, as the One who alone made Him fully known has shown. Yes, the cries of the reapers may never have reached the rich. But they entered into the ears of the Lord of hosts, and His blow would fall when least expected.
One writer refuses to leave this in ancient Israel. He also blocks a common excuse: giving generously out of money squeezed from underpaid workers:
William KellyHe denounces oppression of one's neighbour, even if it is only delaying for a single night to pay what was due to a poor labourer. Wealthy Jews were guilty in this way; is it confined to men of Israel? Employers often hire in a hard spirit that grinds down the poor. Some masters give generously to so-called Christian or charitable causes what they have wrung out of tears and curses. That makes no amends; in God's eyes it makes the wrong worse. And what has trade or commerce to answer for in the oppressive desire to grow rich?
The law gives Israel one reason to care for the poor: God had redeemed them out of Egypt. One writer says no smaller motive lasts:
C. H. MackintoshRemembering the Lord's grace in redeeming them out of Egypt was to be the constant, all-powerful driving force behind how they treated the poor brother. This principle never fails, and nothing lower than this will ever hold up. We can only keep up a course of real, active kindness, whether towards our brothers or those outside, by keeping one thing before our hearts. That is the marvellous grace of God shown to us in the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. Mere kindly feelings bubbling up in our own hearts, or drawn out by the sorrows and needs of others, will prove short-lived.
- The wage is bread. The hired man was taken on by the day and paid at day's end; delay was not an inconvenience but an empty table.
- The wage has no borders. Israelite or foreigner, the protection is the same. God looks at the man's need, not his nationality.
- The wage is watched. God takes account of what the labourer's heart is counting on, down to whether his family goes to bed hungry.
- The wage has a voice. Wages held back cry out to the Lord of hosts. The cry the employer never heard reaches Him.
- The wage is answered by grace. God redeemed Israel out of Egypt by grace. Remembering that, not a passing feeling, keeps a person fair to those below them.
on his day thou shalt give him his hire, neither shall the sun go down upon it; for he is poor, and his soul yearneth after it; lest he cry against thee to Jehovah, and it be a sin in thee.
God's law here reaches down into an ordinary transaction: a man works a day, and at sundown his employer owes him. It is more than a rule about timing. It shows how God views the worker, the delay, and the debt.
The verse protects a worker hired one day at a time. That is why the deadline is sunset, not the end of the month.
Morrish Bible DictionaryHired men were different from the house servants, who were generally slaves. An employer took them on by the day and paid them at the end of the day. A priest's hired servant did not count as one of the family and could not eat the holy food. The slaves did count as part of the family.
So the hired man stood lower than a household slave. He had no claim on the family table. His wage was all he had, and the law guards it.
The deadline turns on what the worker expects, not on what suits the employer. One writer dwells on what God sees in the labourer's heart.
C. H. MackintoshWhat tender care is here! The High and Mighty One who inhabits eternity can take notice of the thoughts and feelings that spring up in the heart of a poor labourer. He knows and takes into account what such a man expects from the fruit of his day's toil. Of course he will look for those wages. The labourer's heart counts on them; the family meal depends on them. Oh, do not hold them back. Do not send the labourer home with a heavy heart, to make the heart of his wife and family heavy too. By all means give him what he has worked for, what he has a right to, and what his heart is set on. He is a husband. He is a father. He has carried the burden and heat of the day so that his wife and children will not go hungry to bed.
The unpaid worker has one place left to take his case. One writer states plainly what happens then.
Numerical Bible NotesOn the other hand, the labourer's hire must not be kept back, in case he cries to the Lord about it, and the Lord visits it as sin.
One writer turns to rich landowners who held back what they owed.
William KellyThey are charged with wanton cruelty and fraud in their dealings with the labourers who reaped their fields. Their very wealth tempts the rich to withhold payment of wages from the poor. Only their own affairs matter in their eyes. They put off the claims of those who live from hand to mouth until a convenient time. But the debt cries aloud to Him who always feels for the poor... The cries of the reapers may never have reached the rich. But they entered the ears of the Lord of hosts, and His blow would fall when least expected.
God charges the sin to the employer, so giving elsewhere settles nothing. One writer applies this to the way business is often run.
William KellyThe employment of labour is often carried on in a hard spirit, grinding the faces of the poor. Masters may give generously to so-called Christian or charitable causes out of money squeezed from tears and curses. In God's eyes that makes up for nothing; it only makes the wrong worse. And how much does trade or commerce have to answer for in the oppressive desire to grow rich?
The man who pays wages answers to a Master of his own.
F. B. HoleFor masters, the leading thought is not love but righteousness. Every Christian master should be continually asking himself about his servants, "What is just? What is fair?" And he is to remember that he too is a servant, with his own Master in the heavens. That Master has laid it down: "with the measure you use it will be measured to you."
- Owed — The hired man worked by the day, and his pay fell due at sunset. He had no place at the family table — only his wage.
- Urgent — God notices what the worker expects from his day's work. His heart counts on that money, and the family meal depends on it.
- Heard — Unpaid wages cry to the Lord. The reapers' cries may never have reached the rich, but they reached the Lord of hosts.
- Charged — The Lord counts the unpaid wage as sin. Giving to good causes out of money squeezed from others only makes it worse.
- Answerable — The employer is a servant too, with his own Master in heaven. The measure he uses will be measured back to him.
The fathers shall not be put to death for the sons, neither shall the sons be put to death for the fathers every man shall be put to death for his own sin.
Deuteronomy 24 collects laws that protect people who are easy to crush: the debtor, the hired worker, the stranger, the widow. Into that list comes a rule for the courtroom. Punishment must stop with the person who did the wrong. That raises a question the rest of Scripture keeps answering. How does it fit with God's warning that He visits the sins of fathers on their children?
This law sits among rules that protect the weak from those with power over them. One writer notes that the practice it bans was common in the countries around Israel.
Numerical Bible NotesNext comes the ban on twisting justice — again two laws. First, the father must not suffer death for the children, nor the children for the fathers, which was common among the nations around them. Second, there must be no oppression of the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow. Their own Redeemer, who brought them out of the oppression of Egypt, told them to keep this.
David broke this law. The Gibeonites, a people living among Israel, asked him for seven of Saul's sons to die for Saul's crime. He agreed without asking God.
Numerical Bible NotesWhen the Gibeonites demanded seven of Saul's sons, to be hanged before the Lord at Gibeah of Saul, he still answers, "I will give them." There is no sign that he asked God again about the matter. He needed no fresh word to refuse what the Gibeonites asked. Israel's book of law had already said it plainly: "Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin."
Later a king of Judah executed the men who murdered his father. He did not touch their sons.
H. L. Rossier"But he did not put to death the children of the murderers, according to what is written in the Book of the Law of Moses... 'Each one shall die for his own sin.'" There again, Amaziah shows an intelligent respect for the Word of God. This commandment of the Lord had been given in Deuteronomy 24:16, and Amaziah governed himself by it with the obedient heart required of all those who hear and read His Word.
God also said He visits the sin of fathers on children to the third and fourth generation. Commentators answer this by separating two things God does. He governs life on earth, and He judges at the end.
F. B. HoleGod is showing how He deals with men on earth in His holy government. When it comes to His judgment for eternity, He will judge the dead "according to their works" (Revelation 20:12-13) and there is no thought of a child bearing the sin of his father. In the working out of God's government in this world, the way a father's sin harms his children is a fact too obvious for any of us to overlook.
A second answer looks at who that warning names.
Numerical Bible NotesHe has Himself assured us that He visits "the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation." But then He adds a much needed safeguard against being misread: "of those who hate Me."
Ezekiel presses it in both directions, and points the son to the warning in his father's fate.
William Kelly"The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father, nor the father suffer for the iniquity of the son..." The wicked father must perish; the son warned by it shall live. So the way is clear for the maxim — the soul who sins shall die — neither the son suffering for his father's wrong nor the father for his son's, but each reaping what he had sown.
If every guilty person owes his own death, then no sinner can ever pay for anybody else. That is why the Saviour had to be sinless.
H H SnellThe law of holiness and truth is that the soul who sins shall die. Death, then, is God's just appointment to man, because he is a sinner. Man dies only because of sin... It is clear that no sinful man could die for the sin of another, because he must die for himself. The Son of God, on whom death had no claim (because He knew no sin), was able to die for others.
- Own sin. Guilt does not pass from one person to another. Each person answers for what he did.
- Own court. This law protected families from a practice common in nearby nations. It stands beside laws that shield the stranger, the fatherless and the widow.
- Own choice. David ignored it and gave up Saul's sons without asking God. Amaziah obeyed it and spared the murderers' children. The written word was guidance enough for both.
- Own account. Commentators read God's warning about the fathers' sins as His rule over life on earth, not His final judgment. They also point to the words He adds: "of those who hate Me."
- One exception. Every sinner must die for himself. So only the sinless Son of God, on whom death had no claim, could die for others.
Thou shalt not pervert the judgment of the stranger, [or] of the fatherless; and thou shalt not take in pledge a widow's garment.
Three kinds of people in Israel had no natural protector: the foreigner living among them, the child with no father, and the widow. This verse puts all three under the protection of the courts. It also stops a lender from taking a widow's garment as security for a loan.
The two halves of the verse guard against two different kinds of pressure — one in court, one in business.
Leslie M. GrantOne may be in a position to take unfair advantage of a stranger or of a fatherless child. But such perversion of justice was sternly forbidden (v.17). Also forbidden was taking a widow's garment as a pledge for debt. For Israel was to remember that they too at one time were in a place of slavery in Egypt, reduced to poverty.
A pledge was an item handed over as security for a loan — here, the clothing off a widow's back.
Morrish Bible DictionaryPeople took items as security for loans from very early times. The law set limits on this, so that no one could use it to take unfair advantage. Exodus 22:26; Deuteronomy 24:10-17; Amos 2:8.
Similar laws appear elsewhere in Scripture. They show what God thinks of those who prey on the weak.
F. B. HoleThese verses protect the rights of those who count for least and can defend themselves least — strangers, widows, the fatherless and the poor. The tendency of fallen mankind is to take advantage of these, oppressing and defrauding them. Such conduct is hateful to God, and His kindness shines out even as He gives His law. He will be their Defender. As He thinks of them His word is, "I am gracious."
Scripture returns to the widow and the fatherless again and again, and the New Testament keeps the same demand.
Edward DennettThe helpless are next commended to their hearts. Of all the helpless ones who appeal to our compassion, the widow and the fatherless surely have the first claim. God surrounds them here with the powerful defence of His own arm... All through Scripture God marks out these two groups as the special object of His care. So they should be objects of our compassionate concern too. James says accordingly, "Religion that is pure and undefiled before God the Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world." (James 1:27)
The law does not only command; it gives a motive. Israel had been slaves, and God had redeemed them.
C. H. MackintoshThey were to remember the Lord's grace in redeeming them out of Egypt. That memory was to be the constant, all-powerful motive behind their actions toward the poor brother. This is a principle that never fails; and nothing lower than this will ever stand. Look for motives anywhere but in God Himself and in His dealings with us, and we shall soon break down in daily life. One thing alone will keep us in a course of true, active kindness. We must keep before our hearts the marvellous grace of God shown to us in the redemption which is in Christ Jesus. Merely kind feelings bubbling up in our own hearts, or drawn out by the sorrows and distresses of others, will prove short-lived.
Israel had two things to look at: God's own example, and their own past.
C. H. MackintoshThey were to keep the divine model before their eyes. They were also to remember their own past history and experience. Then their hearts would be drawn out in sympathy and compassion toward the poor homeless stranger. It was the binding duty and high privilege of the Israel of God to stand where others stood and feel what they felt. They were to be the moral representatives of that blessed One. They were His people, and they bore His Name. They were to imitate Him in meeting the wants and gladdening the hearts of the fatherless, the widow, and the stranger.
Christians have their own Egypt to remember.
Leslie M. GrantGod showed His gracious care for the oppressed, and Israel had to remember that they themselves had been in the land of Egypt. We too who are Christians must remember that we were once in the bondage of sin before being saved by the grace of the Lord Jesus. If so, we shall care about those who have never been set free from the poverty of their sinful state. We should gladly give up something of our own prosperity for their sakes.
- Remember Egypt. Israel had been slaves, and God redeemed them. That memory drives every act of kindness that follows.
- Remember the bench. Bending a court case against a foreigner or a fatherless child is a perversion of justice. God forbids it, because the strong find it so easy.
- Remember the coat. Never hold a widow's garment as security. The law limits the pledge, so that no one profits from her poverty.
- Remember whose side God is on. He defends the ones nobody defends, and while giving the law says of Himself, "I am gracious."
- Remember you are a copy. God's people copy Him toward the widow, the orphan and the stranger. The New Testament calls that religion pure and undefiled.