Deuteronomy 20:10–18

Deuteronomy 20:10 · Darby

When thou approachest unto a city to fight against it, thou shalt proclaim peace unto it.

Deuteronomy 20 sets out Israel's law of battle. Its first instruction toward a hostile city is not an attack but an offer. Why would God order a besieging army to begin with a proclamation of peace, and how far did that offer reach?

A strange way to make war

God's care in this law reaches even the enemy Israel is marching against.

He shows beautiful consideration for the enemy. When they came near the threatened city, they were first called to proclaim peace to it. That is a strange way of making war, but one worthy of God. He took no pleasure in war. He would train His people to go out, even to fight, remembering that their own feet were fitted "with the readiness given by the gospel of peace," if I may say so.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Israel could not treat every city the same way.

They had to draw a careful line between two kinds of city. There were the cities far away from them, and there were the cities of the seven nations under judgment. To the first kind they were to make offers of peace before anything else. With the second they were to make no terms at all. "When you draw near to a city to fight against it, offer terms of peace to it" — a marvellous method of fighting!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Mercy built into the rule

The offer was not a formality. It decided whether the people inside lived.

There was a most merciful arrangement, which consisted in an offer of peace to a besieged city. (The cities of the Canaanite nations are not included.) Peace was the first thing proclaimed. If the city accepted the offer, its people kept their lives. If it refused, the people resisted that offer of peace and so showed the wickedness of their hearts. They were resisting God, and Israel besieged the city.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Destruction was never the aim of Israel's warfare.

Indiscriminate slaughter and wholesale destruction formed no part of Israel's business. Cities willing to accept the offered terms of peace had the privilege of becoming tributaries to the people of God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Refusal meant resisting God

Refusing the offer was more than a military decision.

As to the enemy, a besieged town was always to have the offer of peace by submission. If it resisted, it paid the penalty for resisting God, and not merely men. But Israel was to spare those who did not fight.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Kelly measures the judgment against the offer that came first.

The dealing with them is just as serious as the offer of peace made beforehand was real. God's ways are not as ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The one exception

The rule had one limit.

There was one exception. There must be no peace with the Canaanites. They were not feared as rivals; they were doomed to destruction because of their detestable practices and the way they lured others into them. Some, as is well known, find a difficulty here. This may not remove that difficulty, but others may find it worth knowing that, as a picture, the Canaanites stand for the agents of Satan, the spiritual wickedness in heavenly places. With such enemies there can be no terms and no compromise. There ought to be none. The fight must never stop, at any time or in any circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Israel's sword, the Christian's message

What God gave Israel to do is not what He gives His people to do now.

Scripture reveals nothing more plainly than this. The Lord put the sword of judgment into Israel's hands. In certain cases He commanded them to use it with unrelenting severity (Deut. 20:10-18). How different now! God makes those who have come to find in Jesus a Saviour His own ministers of love, of mercy, and of grace to a rebellious world.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Peace first. Before any attack began, the city heard an offer. Kelly calls it a strange way of making war, but one worthy of God.

- Peace saves. If the city accepted, its people kept their lives, and the city became a tributary to the people of God.

- Peace refused. A city that answered with war was resisting God, and not merely men. Its judgment was as serious as the offer had been real.

- Peace limited. The rule covered distant cities only. The nations of Canaan were doomed for their corrupt practices. As a picture they stand for spiritual powers, and with those no compromise is ever right.

- Peace preached. God placed the sword of judgment in Israel's hands. He now sends those who know Christ as Saviour as His ministers of love, mercy and grace to a rebellious world.

Deuteronomy 20:11 · Darby

And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then all the people that are found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee.

Deuteronomy 20:11 sits inside Israel's law of war. Before any fighting, an army had to offer a city peace, and this verse says what followed when the city said yes.

Peace offered before the sword

The command to call out peace comes before any siege is laid. One writer draws attention to how strange this order of events is for an army marching to battle.

He also shows beautiful consideration for the enemy. When Israel came near the threatened city, their first task was to proclaim peace to it. That is a strange way of making war, but it is worthy of God. He took no pleasure in war. He would train His people to go out, even to fight, while they remembered that they themselves were "shod with the preparation of peace," if I may put it that way.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What acceptance secured

The verse sets terms instead of slaughter. Older translations call the survivors "tributaries"; the ESV calls their work "forced labor." One writer shows what such a city gained, and what Israel could keep from a city that refused.

Killing without limit and total destruction formed no part of Israel's business. If any cities were willing to accept the offered terms of peace, they were to have the privilege of becoming tributaries to the people of God. And in those cities that would make no peace, Israel was to keep everything inside the walls that could be put to use.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

When a city refused

One commentator says whom a city was really fighting when it refused, and who was still spared.

As to the enemy, Israel always had to offer a besieged town peace on terms of submission. If the town resisted, it paid the penalty of resisting God, not merely man. But Israel was to spare those who did not fight.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Another writer sets the judgment and the offer side by side.

There is just as serious a dealing with them, in proportion to the reality with which the offer of peace had been made before. God's ways are not as ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The one exception

This law covered distant cities only. The nations already living in the land fell outside it. One writer faces the difficulty readers feel here, and points to what those nations stand for.

There was one exception: there must be no peace with the Canaanites. This was not because Israel dreaded them as rivals. They were doomed to destruction because of their vile practices and the way they lured others into them. It is well known that some find a difficulty in this. It may interest others to know that, read as a picture, the Canaanites represent the agents of Satan, the spiritual wickedness in heavenly places — those rulers of the darkness of this world with whom we are called to wrestle now. They are the powers of evil that keep turning every part of religion into a means of deliberate and ruinous dishonour of God. With such there can be, and ought to be, no terms, no compromise, no stopping of the fight at any time or in any circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A pattern for a future day

One writer finds the same pattern in God's future judgment of the nations.

God will not destroy all the earth in that day. He will destroy only those nations where His witnesses have been, the nations that will then band together against the Lord's anointed. The kingdoms of the world will become the Lord's, and He will not destroy them. The far-off islands will form the procession of Messiah's glory on earth, just as the distant cities and peoples of old were to be left alive to become tributaries to Israel (Deut. 20:10-18). Only those will be cut off who had filled up the measure of their sin and defied God.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Israel's sword, the Christian's errand

One writer puts two commands from the same Lawgiver side by side, and says what changed for God's people.

Scripture reveals nothing more clearly than this: the Lord put the sword of judgment into Israel's hands. He commanded them to use it with unsparing severity in certain cases (Deut. 20:10-18). It was an honour given to them to carry out the judgment that was written, and this will be true of them again, strange as that may sound to our ears. How different it is now! Those who have been led to find in Jesus a Saviour... are made God's ministers of love, of mercy, and of grace to a rebellious world. The same Divine Lawgiver who... said to Saul, "Utterly destroy, and spare them not," now, in the day of salvation, says to His redeemed, "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Peace first. Israel had to offer terms before laying siege — a strange way to make war, yet fitting for a God who took no pleasure in war.

- Peace accepted. Opening the gate did not mean destruction. The city lived, and its people served Israel as tributaries. One writer calls that a privilege, not a punishment.

- Peace refused. A city that fought on was not resisting an army only. It bore the penalty of resisting God, and the judgment was as serious as the offer had been real.

- Peace excluded. The nations already in the land fell outside this rule. Read as a picture, they stand for the powers of evil, with whom no truce is ever right.

- Peace proclaimed today. God once put the sword in Israel's hands, and one day will do so again. Today He sends those who belong to Christ as ministers of love and mercy, told to love their enemies.

Deuteronomy 20:12 · Darby

And if it will not make peace with thee, but will make war with thee, then thou shalt besiege it;

Deuteronomy 20 sets out Israel's rules for war, and verse 12 marks the turning point. A city has heard an offer of peace and has answered with war — and everything that follows hangs on that refusal.

Peace Before the Siege

This verse only makes sense in the light of what comes before it. God told Israel to approach a city first with an offer of peace. Only a refusal opened the way to a siege. One writer sees God's care for the enemy here, and finds His later severity matching how real that offer was:

God shows beautiful consideration for the enemy. When Israel came near the threatened city, they were first told to proclaim peace to it. That is a strange way to make war, but it is worthy of God. He took no pleasure in war... There is just as serious a dealing with the city that refuses, in proportion to the reality with which the offer of peace had been made before. God's ways are not as ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Refusal Means

The peace on offer was peace by submission. To refuse it was to resist more than an army:

As for the enemy, a besieged town was always to have the offer of peace by submission. If it resisted, it suffered the penalty of resisting God, not man merely. But Israel was to spare those who took no part in the fighting. The Canaanites, as under the divine curse, are an exception to this. As for the land, Israel was not to cut down the fruit trees, but leave them to support life.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Limits Set on the Sword

The siege was not a free hand to destroy. One commentator points to both limits: what a city gained by yielding, and the restraint Israel still owed a city that refused:

Killing everyone and destroying everything formed no part of Israel's business. Any city willing to accept the offered terms of peace had the privilege of becoming a tributary to the people of God. And in the cities that would make no peace, Israel was to keep everything inside their walls that could be of use.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same writer looks past the battlefield. He takes the men who fell by the sword as standing for "the positive energy of evil" (C. H. Mackintosh).

The Cities With No Offer of Peace

This rule of peace first, then siege, applied only to distant cities. It left out the nations already living in Canaan. Many readers find that hard, and one commentator faces the difficulty directly:

There was one exception: there must be no peace with the Canaanites. They were not doomed because Israel feared them as rivals. They were doomed to destruction because of their detestable practices, and because they drew others into them. It is well known that some find a difficulty in this... Seen as a picture, the Canaanites stand for the agents of Satan, the spiritual wickedness in heavenly places — those rulers of the darkness of this world we are called to wrestle with now... With such enemies there can be, there ought to be, no terms, no compromise, no stopping of the fight at any time or in any circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Israel's Sword and the Christian's Calling

This chapter puts a sword in the hands of God's people. One writer marks how different things stand now for those who follow Christ. He quotes the two commands below in an older wording than the ESV:

Scripture reveals no truth more clearly than this: the Lord put the sword of judgment into the hands of Israel. He commanded them to use it with unrelenting severity in certain cases (Deut. 20:10-18). It was an honour given to them to carry out the judgment written... How different now! Those who have been led to discover in Jesus a Saviour... are made God's ministers of love, of mercy, and of grace to a rebellious world. The same Divine Lawgiver said to Saul, in full keeping with the age of the law, "Utterly destroy, and spare them not." Now, in the day of salvation, He says to His redeemed, "Love your enemies, bless those who curse you, and do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who mistreat you."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Peace first. Israel had to proclaim terms of peace before any siege. War was God's second word, never His first.

- Peace refused. Verse 12 begins at a refusal. To reject terms sent by God is to resist God, "not man merely," and what follows is as serious as the offer was real.

- Peace limited. Even in war Israel did not destroy everything. A city that yielded lived under tribute, Israel spared those who took no part in the fighting, and the fruit trees stood.

- Peace impossible. The Canaanites received no offer at all, and with the spiritual evil they picture there is still no compromise.

- Peace proclaimed. Israel carried a sword; His redeemed now carry love, mercy and grace to a rebellious world.

Deuteronomy 20:13 · Darby

and when Jehovah thy God delivereth it into thy hand, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword

Deuteronomy 20:13 closes a law of war: Israel had to offer a distant city peace first, and could besiege it only if the city refused. So why does the offer come first, and whose victory is it when the city falls?

Peace offered before the sword drawn

What comes just before this verse sets its severity. Israel had to call out terms of peace to a city before attacking it. One writer notes how strange that is as a way to make war:

He shows beautiful consideration for the enemy too. When they came near the threatened city, they were first told to proclaim peace to it. That is a strange way of making war, but it is worthy of God. He took no pleasure in war... And He deals with a city that refuses just as seriously as the earlier offer of peace was real. God's ways are not as ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Refusal — and who was spared

A besieged city was not simply a victim. It had answered an offer, and its answer decided what came next:

There was a most merciful arrangement: an offer of peace to a besieged city. (The cities of the Canaanite nations are not included.) Peace was the first thing proclaimed. If the city accepted the offer, the lives of its people were saved. If it refused, and the people resisted the call to peace and so showed the wickedness of their hearts in resisting God, the city was besieged. All the males were to be struck with the sword, but the women and little ones were saved.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Not a licence for wholesale slaughter

Israel carried a sword, but not a free hand with it. The law drew lines around what Israel could and could not do:

Indiscriminate slaughter and wholesale destruction formed no part of Israel's business. Any city willing to accept the offered terms of peace was given the privilege of becoming a tribute-paying subject of the people of God. As for the cities that would make no peace, everything inside their walls that could be used was to be kept.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Victory handed over, not won

The verse does not say Israel took the city. It says God gives it into their hand. The whole chapter rests on that dependence:

The governing principle here, as everywhere, is confidence in Jehovah. He had taken His people, brought them out of Egypt into relationship with Himself, and was now placing them in His own land... It was not a question of soldiers or strategy, of force or skill or trickery, but of Jehovah their God... So losing heart could not be tolerated. It could only come from one thing — that the people were thinking not of Jehovah their God, but of themselves or their enemies.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The one case with no offer of peace

This rule covered distant cities only. God dealt with the nations already in the land in another way, and commentators explain that difference in two ways. One writer points to what those nations had become:

These nations had sold themselves to serve demons and idols. Their cup of iniquity was full, and none were to be spared (Deut. 18:9-12). God knew that if they lived on, they would teach Israel the same evils these idolaters were used to (v. 18).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another reads the same exception as a picture for the believer's own conflict:

Seen as a picture, the Canaanites stand for Satan's agents, the spiritual wickedness in heavenly places — the rulers of the darkness of this world that we are called to wrestle with now... With such enemies there can be, and there ought to be, no terms, no compromise, and no ending of the fight at any time or in any possible circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A sword then, a message now

What God commanded Israel here is not what He asks of His people today:

Scripture reveals no truth more clearly than this: the Lord put the sword of judgment into the hands of Israel and commanded them to use it with unrelenting severity in certain cases (Deut. 20:10-18)... How different now! Some have been led to find a Saviour in Jesus, to know the ransom of their souls by His blood, and to receive in Him, risen and glorified, the free gifts of righteousness and eternal life. They are made God's ministers of love, of mercy, and of grace to a rebellious world.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Peace first. The sword never falls on a city that has not first heard terms of peace. The severity matches how real the offer was.

- Peace refused. The siege follows a decision. In turning down the offer the city showed the wickedness of its heart in resisting God. Its men fell; its women and children were spared.

- Peace bounded. Indiscriminate slaughter was no part of Israel's business. Israel kept whatever inside the walls could be used.

- Peace granted by God. God gives the city into their hand. Victory is not a matter of soldiers, strategy or skill, but of Jehovah their God.

- Peace preached. Israel once carried the sword of judgment. Those who know Jesus as Saviour are now God's ministers of love, mercy and grace to a rebellious world.

Deuteronomy 20:14 · Darby

only the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that shall be in the city, all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take as booty for thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which Jehovah thy God giveth thee

This verse ends the rule for a distant city that refused Israel's offer of peace. The fighting men fall, but the women, children, livestock and goods are kept. Why does God limit a war He Himself ordered — and what were His people to do with an enemy's wealth?

The Law of Battles

The instructions in this chapter are not military strategy. One writer notes the care God took to keep Israel from copying how the nations around them fought.

In Deuteronomy 20 comes the law of battles. God takes the utmost care that they should in no way copy the loose ways of the nations. The ruling principle here, as everywhere else, is confidence in Jehovah. He had taken His people, brought them out of Egypt into relationship with Himself, and was now placing them in His own land... It was not a question of soldiers or strategy, of force or skill or trickery, but of Jehovah their God... What secures victory is the certainty that our God calls us to the fight, and that the battle is His, not ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Peace Was Offered First

Verse 14 only applies after a city has refused terms. One writer sees God's own character in that order.

God shows beautiful thoughtfulness even for the enemy. When His people came near the threatened city, they were first told to offer it peace: a strange way of making war, but worthy of God. He took no pleasure in war... "But if it makes no peace with you, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it." He then deals with them just as seriously as the offer of peace had been genuine. God's ways are not our ways.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer says why the penalty was so heavy: a city that refused the offer "suffered the penalty of resisting God, not just men" (Numerical Bible Notes).

Limits on the Killing

The verse spares those who did not fight, and keeps what the city held. That sets a limit on the whole campaign.

Killing everyone and destroying everything formed no part of Israel's business. Cities willing to accept the terms of peace had the privilege of becoming tribute-payers to the people of God. In cities that would make no peace, everything inside the walls that could be used was to be kept.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What the Spoil Was For

Israel did not seize the plunder; they received it. The verse calls it something the LORD gave. Mackintosh sees the goods kept back as whatever could be "turned to account, in the service of God, and of His people" (Mackintosh). He applies that straight to how a believer handles money.

There are things in nature and things of earth that can be used for God; the word of God and prayer sanctify them... If this world's riches come into a Christian's hands, he should put them to work in the service of Christ with care and faithfulness. He should give them out freely to the poor, and to all the Lord's needy workers. In short, he should make them available, in every right and wise way, to further the Lord's work in every area. Otherwise those same riches might crumble into dust in their hands, or turn to rust on their souls. Used this way, they will produce precious fruit.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Limits of This Rule

This rule did not cover the cities inside Canaan. The next verses draw the line.

However, this applied only to cities far from the land of Canaan, not to any of the cities of the land. For those cities God had already commanded Israel to kill the men, women, children and livestock (vv.16-17)... These nations had sold themselves to the worship of demons and idols. Their sin had reached its full measure, and no one was to be spared. God knew that if they lived on they would teach Israel the same evils these idol-worshippers had grown used to.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Sword Then, the Gospel Now

Writers are careful to say that this commission belonged to Israel and not to Christians.

Scripture reveals no truth more plainly than this: the Lord put the sword of judgment into the hands of Israel, and told them to use it without mercy in certain cases (Deut. 20:10-18)... How different it is now! People who have been led to find a Saviour in Jesus... are made God's ministers of love, of mercy, and of grace to a rebellious world. The same Divine Lawgiver who... said to Saul, "devote to destruction all that they have... Do not spare them," now, in the day of salvation, says to His redeemed, "Love your enemies... and pray for those who persecute you."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Peace first. The sword in this chapter is never the opening move; an offer of peace always came before a siege.

- Refusal costs. A city that turned the offer down was resisting God, not just men. God dealt with it as seriously as the offer had been genuine.

- Mercy holds. Even in a war God ordered, Israel could not destroy everything. Israel spared the women, children, livestock and goods.

- Spoil is a gift. The goods were not loot grabbed by soldiers. They were a gift from the LORD, to be used in His service — the same rule that governs money in a believer's hands today.

- Canaan excepted. This rule covered distant cities only. The nations inside the land, whose sin was full, faced a separate sentence, so Israel would not learn their evils.

Deuteronomy 20:15 · Darby

Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities that are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations.

This chapter's rules of war — offer peace, besiege, take spoil — apply only to cities "very far from you." The nations already living in Canaan came under a different rule, which raises the hardest question of the chapter: why two standards?

Two kinds of war

The mercy of the earlier verses stops at the border of the land. One writer gives the reason.

However, this applied only to cities far from the land of Canaan, not to any of the cities of the land. For these, God had already commanded that Israel put the men, women, children and livestock to death (vs.16-17). These nations had sold themselves to the service of demon worship and idolatry. Their cup of iniquity was full, and Israel was to spare no one (Deut.18:9-12). God knew that if these idolaters lived on, they would teach Israel the same evils they were used to (v.18).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Peace proclaimed first

Before besieging a distant city, Israel had to call peace to it first. One writer sees God's own character in that order.

There is also a beautiful consideration on His part for the enemy. When they came near the threatened city, God first told them to proclaim peace to it. It is a strange way of making war, but worthy of God. He took no pleasure in war. Even when His people went out to fight, He would train them to remember that they themselves were "shod with the preparation of peace," if I may put it that way… Yet the dealing with a city that refused was as serious as the offer of peace before it had been real. God's ways are not as ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Nothing swept away without purpose

The verse governs a set of rules that are restrained, not brutal. A city that surrendered became a tributary rather than a ruin.

Indiscriminate slaughter and wholesale destruction formed no part of Israel's business. Any city willing to accept the terms of peace offered to it was to have the privilege of becoming a tributary to the people of God. As for the cities that would make no peace, Israel was to keep back everything within their walls that could be put to use.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The one exception, and what it pictures

Canaan alone was shut out of the offer of peace. One writer gives the reason, and then what those nations picture.

There was one exception: there must be no peace with the Canaanites. They were not feared as rivals. They were doomed to destruction because of their abominations and the way they led others astray. It is well known that some find a difficulty in this. It may interest others… to know that, read as a picture, the Canaanites stand for the agents of Satan, the spiritual wickedness in heavenly places… With such there can be, and there ought to be, no terms, no compromise, and no stopping the fight at any time or under any circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not a rule for Christians

The chapter is often read as though it set a pattern for how God's people should treat enemies today. One writer answers that God acts on a different principle now.

These are the lovely ethics of the church of God: the principles of that heavenly kingdom to which all true Christians belong. Would they have suited Israel of old? Certainly not. Only imagine Joshua acting toward the Canaanites on the principles of Romans 12! It would have been as glaring an inconsistency as for us to act on the principle of Deuteronomy 20. How is this? Simply because, in Joshua's day, God was carrying out judgement in righteousness. Now He is dealing in unqualified grace.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The far-off cities and what is still to come

One writer sees the sparing of distant cities as a picture of God's future dealing with the nations.

It is not all the earth that is then to be destroyed, but only those nations among whom God's witnesses have previously been… The kingdoms of the world shall then become the Lord's, and shall not be destroyed. The islands far off shall form the train of the earthly glory of Messiah, just as the distant cities and peoples of old were to be left alive to become tributaries to Israel (Deut. 20:10-18).

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Distance decides. The milder rules belong to cities far off, never to the nations already holding Canaan.

- Peace comes first. Even against distant enemies, Israel's first move was an offer of peace. God took no pleasure in war.

- Restraint, not ruin. Sweeping slaughter was no part of Israel's task. A city that surrendered became a tributary, and Israel kept whatever could be put to use.

- One exception. Canaan alone was shut out, because of its corruptions and the danger of Israel copying them. Read as a picture, it shows that spiritual evil can never be given terms.

- Grace rules now. Then God was carrying out judgement in righteousness; now He deals in unqualified grace. The cities once spared still hint at nations one day brought under Messiah's reign.

Deuteronomy 20:16 · Darby

But of the cities of these peoples which Jehovah thy God giveth thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth,

Deuteronomy 20 sets out Israel's law of war, and here the rules change: Israel could offer peace to distant cities, but not to the cities of the land God was giving them. This raises a hard question — why would a good God give such an order, and what does it say to readers today?

Two Rules, Not One

Israel's normal way of war was to offer terms first. Even in a siege, the chapter limited what Israel could destroy.

Indiscriminate slaughter and wholesale destruction formed no part of Israel's business. Any city willing to accept the offer of peace was given the privilege of paying tribute to the people of God. And in a city that refused peace, everything inside the walls that could be used was to be kept.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The nations of the land are the one exception, and the reason given is not military.

There was one exception: there must be no peace with the Canaanites. They were not feared as rivals. They were doomed to destruction for their vile practices and for luring others into them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Centuries of Patience First

God did not act against a people He had ignored. He waited, and Scripture records how long.

Already in Genesis 15:16 God had said to Abraham: "For the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete." The Amorites were one of the main nations of Canaan. The Canaanites worshipped idols called Baal ("Lord"), Moloch ("King") and Astaroth ("Spouse"), and that worship went with dreadful moral excesses such as child sacrifice and prostitution. And yet God showed grace towards these nations for more than 400 years.

Modernised from Arend RemmersOriginal wording

That guilt is what answers the complaint — and God held His own people to the same standard.

No nation on earth was such a breeding ground for every kind of corruption among men, and for all wickedness and abomination in the sight of God, as the Canaanites whom God devoted to destruction... Far from passing over His own people, God never dealt with any nation as strictly as with Israel. Every soul of Israel perished in the wilderness except the two spies... where can men justly complain of the doom that fell on such corrupters of the race?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Executioner, Not Conqueror

Israel was not grabbing land it wanted. God handed Israel a task, and the task carried a lesson.

Israel was in this respect only the executioner of divine judgment, not of their own passion or greed for gain. He could have destroyed them Himself by plague or famine. Instead He chose Israel to do it, and so taught His people the most solemn lesson He could give them, in the holiness of His own nature, and in what sin is before Him. They themselves would incur similar awful judgments if they followed them in their sin.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The Charge of Cruelty

Some readers object that this order is cruel. One writer answers by holding two truths about God together.

Opponents of Scripture have sometimes attacked the severity of the LORD's orders to Israel about their enemies. If God is love, why would He tell His people to act like this? The answer is very simple: "God is light," as well as love. The nations in and around Canaan were so soaked in terrible evils that they were a moral ulcer in the middle of the earth. It was mercy to others, and righteousness in God, to destroy them completely, after bearing with them so patiently. How much of a cancer does a skilled surgeon's knife spare?

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What Sparing Them Cost

Israel did not carry the order out, and the survivors cost them dearly.

They left many alive who should have been destroyed. Those spared became the wretched instruments of Israel's own ruin, leading Israel into the very sins that had called so loudly for divine judgement.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Not Our Commission

No reader today is handed a sword. This command belonged to one people at one point, and Christians are given the opposite order.

The same Divine Lawgiver, in full keeping with the age of law, told Saul to destroy Amalek utterly and to spare none. Now, in the day of salvation, He says to His redeemed, "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What stays with us is the picture. These nations stand for an enemy believers still face.

Seen as a picture, the Canaanites stand for the agents of Satan — the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places, the rulers of this present darkness whom we are called to wrestle with now... With them there can be, and ought to be, no terms, no compromise, and no letting up in the fight, at any time or in any circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Limited — This is not a rule for war in general. Israel could offer distant cities peace and take them as tributaries. Only the nations of the land itself were to be destroyed.

- Deserved — God waited more than 400 years while the guilt of these nations filled up. He bore with child sacrifice and prostitution before He acted.

- Delegated — Israel struck as the executioner of God's judgment, not out of greed. In carrying it out, Israel learned what sin looks like to a holy God.

- Consistent — The same God let a whole generation of His own people die in the wilderness. He shows no favourites.

- Costly — Israel spared nations it was told to destroy. Those survivors dragged Israel into the very sins that had condemned them. No such sword is given today; Christians are told to love their enemies.

Deuteronomy 20:17 · Darby

but shalt utterly devote them to destruction, the Hittites and the Amorites, the Canaanites and the Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites, as Jehovah thy God hath commanded thee;

Six nations are named here, and Israel is told to leave none of them alive — a command that has troubled readers ever since. Commentators ask what "devote" means, why these nations, and why God used Israel's sword instead of His own hand.

Not Rivals, but Usurpers

The chapter as a whole sets out how Israel was to make war, and this verse marks off the one group with whom no terms were possible. The reason was not that Israel wanted the land for itself.

In Deuteronomy 20 we see how the fear of Jehovah controlled war, both inside and outside. It was not a rival to be got rid of, but the corrupt races who in fact held the land, to be destroyed by and for Israel, to whom the land was divinely given.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Meaning of "Devote to Destruction"

The phrase "devote them to complete destruction" is a legal term in Israel's law. It belongs to the language of vows, not to the language of battle.

Living things could be vowed to Him in two ways. They could be consecrated to Him in life. Or, under certain conditions, they could be devoted to Him forever. This second kind of vow is called cherem. Men, animals and fields could be devoted in this way, and for these no redemption was permitted. In the case of people, such a vow was probably meant to affect only the enemies of God and of Israel. Their death was the only possible way to fulfil it. The Canaanites are an example of this (Deuteronomy 20:17).

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why These Nations, and Why Now

Commentators point back four hundred years to God's word to Abraham. This was not the first time God had swept away a whole society.

The first case was of course the flood. Humanity was then wiped off the face of the earth, apart from eight souls. The second was the destruction of the cities of the plain, including Sodom and Gomorrah. Only righteous Lot and two daughters were saved. On both these occasions the destruction was an act of God — by water, and by fire and sulphur. In both cases human corruption had risen so high that it could no longer be tolerated. This was now the case with the Amorite nations. Some four hundred years earlier Abraham had been told, "the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete" (Genesis 15:16), but now it clearly was complete.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

God's Justice in Israel's Hand

God could have used plague or famine, as He had used water and fire before. He chose Israel's hands instead.

Israel was in this respect only the executioner of divine judgment, not of their own passion or greed for land. He might have destroyed them by plague or famine. Instead He chose Israel to carry out this task. In doing so He gave His people the most solemn lesson they could receive: the holiness of His own nature, and what sin is before Him.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Some ask whether such a command is worthy of God at all. One writer answers by pointing at the Canaanites themselves, and at how God treated Israel.

Of all the nations on earth, none was such a breeding ground for every kind of corruption among men, and for all wickedness in the sight of God, as the Canaanites whom God devoted to destruction. So, as far as righteousness goes, it was perfectly just to hold these Canaanites up as a solemn warning to all the world and for all time. In the last lecture we saw that, far from passing over His own people, God never dealt with any nation as strictly as with Israel. Every soul of Israel died in the wilderness except the two spies who stood for God, even against their fellows as well as against the crowd. If God let all Israel fall in the wilderness for their sins, and did not spare even the single fault of Moses, how can anyone justly complain about the doom that fell on such corrupters of the human race?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

When Israel Spared Them

Israel did not carry out the command. Commentators trace Israel's later history straight back to that failure.

It was a high honour put on Israel to wipe out those guilty nations. They proved themselves completely unworthy of that honour, because they failed to do as they were commanded. They left alive many who should have been utterly destroyed. The peoples they spared became the miserable instruments of Israel's own final ruin. They led Israel into the very sins that had called so loudly for divine judgment.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Picture for Believers Today

Some readers still find this command hard. One writer offers a further angle: what these nations picture.

Seen as a picture, the Canaanites stand for the agents of Satan — the spiritual wickedness in heavenly places. They are the rulers of the darkness of this world, and we are called to wrestle with them now. In particular, they are the powers of evil that keep turning every link of religion into a means of deliberate and ruinous dishonour to God. With such enemies there can be no terms and no compromise, and there ought to be none. The fight must never stop, at any time or under any possible circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Devoted. The command uses the language of a vow — cherem, something handed over to God for ever, with no buying back.

- Ripened. These nations were not judged early. Abraham was told their iniquity was "not yet complete"; by now it was, as with the flood and Sodom before.

- Executioner. Israel carried out God's sentence, not its own greed — and learned along the way what sin looks like to a holy God.

- Spared. Israel left many alive. Those spared peoples then dragged Israel into the same sins, and into ruin.

- No terms. Read as a picture, these nations stand for the spiritual powers we wrestle with. With them, compromise is never an option.

Deuteronomy 20:18 · Darby

that they teach you not to do according to all their abominations, which they have done unto their gods, so that ye sin against Jehovah your God.

Moses has just set out two rules for war: Israel could offer peace to far-off cities, but not to the nations living in the land. This verse gives the reason — those nations would teach Israel their practices, and Israel would sin against the Lord.

The Reason God Gives

One writer links the severity to what these nations had become, and to what they would pass on:

The offer of peace applied only to cities far from the land of Canaan, not to any city inside it. For those cities, God had already commanded that men, women, children and livestock should all be killed (vv. 16-17). These nations had sold themselves to demon worship and idolatry. Their sin had reached its full measure, and none were to survive. God knew that if they lived on, they would teach Israel the same evils these idolaters had grown used to (v. 18).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Israel the Executioner, Not the Judge

Israel held the sword, but the sentence was God's, not theirs. The command also taught Israel something about God Himself:

The land itself was vomiting them out because of their detestable practices. In this Israel was only the executioner of God's judgment. They were not acting out of their own passion or greed for land. God could have destroyed these nations by plague or famine. Instead He chose Israel to carry it out. In this way He gave His own people the most solemn lesson possible: the holiness of His own nature, and what sin is before Him. They would face the same terrible judgments themselves if they followed these nations into their sin. Their vile gods of lust and murder were the full outcome and expression of that sin.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The One Exception to the Offer of Peace

Every other city heard an offer of peace first. Canaan alone did not, and some readers find that hard. One writer answers by pointing to what these nations picture:

There was one exception. There was to be no peace with the Canaanites. The reason was not that Israel feared them as rivals. They were doomed to destruction because of their vile practices and the way they lured others into them. It is well known that some find this hard to accept... Seen as a picture, the Canaanites stand for Satan's agents — the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places, the cosmic powers over this present darkness, whom we are called to wrestle with now. They are the very powers of evil that keep twisting every connection with religion into a deliberate and ruinous insult to God. With enemies like these there can be, and ought to be, no terms, no compromise, and no pause in the fight at any time or in any circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Warning Came True

The verse was a warning as much as a reason. Israel never carried the command through, and what followed matched that warning:

God gave Israel a high honour in making them destroy those guilty nations. Israel proved completely unworthy of it, because they did not do what He commanded. They left many alive who should have been destroyed. Those spared people became the miserable tools of Israel's own ruin. They led Israel into the very sins that had cried out for God's judgement.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Not a Rule for Christians to Copy

The same writer says plainly that this chapter is not a rule for Christians today. He puts the difference in what God is doing in each period:

These are the lovely ethics of the church of God: the principles of the heavenly kingdom that all true Christians belong to. Would they have suited Israel long ago? Certainly not. Just imagine Joshua treating the Canaanites by the principles of Romans 12! That would have been as glaring a contradiction as it would be for us to act on the principle of Deuteronomy 20. Why the difference? In Joshua's day God was carrying out judgement in righteousness. Now He is dealing in pure grace. The principle on which God acts is the great moral guide for His people in every age.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Temptation to Spare Part of the Evil

If the enemy is now a spiritual one, the pull to leave part of it standing is still strong. We bargain with ourselves over how much of the evil has to go:

This is just how the poor heart likes to reason. So we often deceive ourselves when we must judge and abandon what is evil. We persuade ourselves that holding something back is right. We imagine we can pick and choose and make some distinction. We will give up some of the evil, but not all. We are ready to burn the wood of the idol, but spare the gold and silver.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Taught — the danger named here is teaching, not rivalry. These nations would train Israel in their practices, so the ban shut the infection out.

- Full — their sin had reached its limit. Israel carried out God's sentence and did not act out of its own greed.

- Terms — Israel offered far-off cities peace first. Canaan alone got none, because what these nations picture allows no compromise, ever.

- Spared — Israel disobeyed and left survivors. Those survivors became the tools of Israel's own ruin, just as this verse warned.

- Now — this chapter is not a Christian's rule of conduct. God judged then; He deals in grace now. What stands is to spare no part of the evil we must judge.