Deuteronomy 20:1–20

Deuteronomy 20:1 · Darby

When thou goest out to war against thine enemies, and seest horses, and chariots, [and] a people more numerous than thou, thou shalt not fear them; for Jehovah thy God is with thee, who brought thee up out of the land of Egypt.

Deuteronomy 20 sets out Israel's law of war, and it opens with the heart, not with tactics: do not fear a larger army. The reason is God's presence, not Israel's strength — which raises two questions: why does God send His people to war, and what does this chapter mean for readers who never fight with swords?

Why God Sent His People to War

Many readers stumble at the picture of God as a warrior. One writer says the problem comes from mixing up two ways God has acted:

How wonderful to think of the Lord as a Warrior! Think of Him fighting against people! Some find that very hard to accept — how could a kind God act in such a way? But the difficulty comes mostly from not telling apart the different ages in which God has dealt with people. It fitted the character of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob to fight against His enemies, just as it fits the character of the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ to forgive them.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

He makes the same point in reverse:

Just imagine Joshua treating the Canaanites by the principles of Romans 12! That would have been as glaring a contradiction as it would be for us to act on the principle of Deuteronomy 20. Why? Because in Joshua's day God was carrying out judgement in righteousness. Now He is dealing in grace without conditions.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Horses and Chariots

The verse names what frightens the eye: horses, chariots and numbers. Later God told Israel to destroy captured horses and chariots instead of using them. One writer explains why:

Canaan was full of horses and chariots. When Israel entered it, Jehovah said, "You shall hamstring their horses and burn their chariots with fire" (Joshua 11:6). Israel's God objected to His people using the methods of the nations in HIS work. His people's confidence must be in Himself alone.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Confidence, Not Strategy

One principle governs Israel's whole law of war:

The governing principle here, as elsewhere, is confidence in Jehovah. He had taken His people, brought them out of Egypt into relationship with Himself, and was now placing them in His own land… It was not a question of troops or strategy, of force or skill or trickery, but of Jehovah their God… So faintheartedness would be intolerable. It could only come from one thing: the people were thinking of themselves or of their enemies, and not of Jehovah their God… What secures victory is the certainty that our God calls us to the fight, and that the battle is His, not ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"Who Brought You Up Out of Egypt"

The command not to fear rests on a history. God names Himself as the One who had already rescued them:

"The Lord your God is with you," and that in the very character in which He had brought them out of the land of Egypt. He was with them in the power of that sovereign grace which had rescued them from the iron grip of Pharaoh and the iron slavery of Egypt. That same grace had brought them through the sea and led them across "the great and terrible wilderness." This made victory sure.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

No Conditions Attached

Notice what the promise leaves out:

Notice that the priest proposes not a single condition in these words… He does not say, "The Lord your God will be with you, if you do so and so." … Grace proposes no conditions, raises no barriers, sets no terms. Its language is, "The Lord your God is with you… He goes with you… to fight for you… to save you."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. Another writer reads the promise as resting on Israel's obedience:

This assumes their obedience. If they were obedient, they had nothing to fear.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Battle We Fight

The same writer applies the chapter to Christians:

As Christians we must carry on a constant spiritual warfare. We have to fight for every inch of heavenly ground. What the Canaanites were to Israel, evil spirits in the heavenly places are to us… We are not fighting for eternal life; God gave us that as a free gift before we begin. We are not fighting for salvation; we are saved before we enter the conflict. We fight to make good, maintain, and live out our heavenly position and character.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Presence — The whole command rests on one fact: God is with His people. The size of the other army never enters the argument.

- Past — He identifies Himself by the Exodus. Yesterday's rescue is the argument against today's fear.

- Promise — The priest's words carry no "if." God goes with them, fights for them, saves them. Some writers add that this assumes obedience.

- Purity — Israel destroyed captured horses and chariots instead of using them, so that trust could rest on God alone.

- Present — Believers still fight, but not for salvation; that is a gift already received. The fight is to hold in daily life the ground God has given.

Deuteronomy 20:2 · Darby

And it shall be, when ye approach unto the battle, that the priest shall draw near and speak unto the people,

Israel is about to go into battle, and God's first instruction is not about tactics. Before the officers give a single order, a priest steps out in front of the army — so why does a priest speak first?

Priest First, Officers Second

The order of the two speakers carries the lesson:

The reader will notice the order. As the people came near the battle, the priest was to speak to them first, and the officers after him. This order is very beautiful. The priest came forward to unfold the people's high privileges. The officers came to remind them of their holy responsibilities. Such is the divine order here. Privilege comes first, and then responsibility.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Priest's Ministry

One writer explains why the first voice was a priest's:

The priest was the very expression of the grace of God. His ministry was a stream of most precious comfort. It flowed from the loving heart of the God of Israel to each individual warrior. His loving words were meant to steady the mind and put strength into the weakest arm for the fight. He assures them of the divine presence with them.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

No Conditions Attached

Notice what the priest does not say. His message contains no terms for the soldiers to meet first:

Let my reader note that the priest proposes not one single condition. He states, in the most absolute way, the relationship of the Israel of God, and the privilege that comes with it. He does not say, "The Lord your God will be with you, if you do such and such." That is not the language of a man who stood before God's people to set out the privileges grace had given them. Grace proposes no conditions, raises no barriers, makes no stipulations. When Jehovah fights for His people, they are sure of victory. "If God is for us, who can be against us?"

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. Another writer reads the same threefold promise as resting on Israel's obedience:

The divine assurance was threefold: Jehovah goes with you, to fight for you, to save you. This presupposes their obedience. If they were obedient, they had nothing to fear. Victory was on their side.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Confidence, Not Strategy

One commentator names the principle running through these laws of battle:

The governing principle here, as elsewhere, is confidence in Jehovah. He is the God who had taken His people, brought them out of Egypt into relationship with Himself, and was now placing them in His own land… It was not a question of soldiery or strategy, of force or skill or fraud, but of Jehovah their God… The heavenly land is for us the scene of conflict with the enemy. There are no such laws of war in the other books of Moses; they are here only. The wilderness is the scene of temptation. Canaan is the place where the enemy must be fought and beaten. But there is no power by which he can be overcome except the power of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fear, then, is not a small weakness. It shows where a man is looking:

So faintheartedness could not be tolerated. It could only come from this — that the people were thinking not of Jehovah their God, but of themselves or their enemies. What secures victory is the certainty that our God calls us to the fight, and that the battle is His, not ours. Where that is so, we are as sure of the end as of the beginning.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Battle Believers Face

One writer moves from that scene straight to the fight believers are in now:

When a battle was about to take place, the priest (the high priest) was to speak to the people first. He told them to have no fear of the enemy. The Lord was with them to fight for them and save them from defeat. Let us remember that believers today are called to fight. The fight is not against flesh and blood. It is against the deceit of satanic hostility that seeks to keep us from enjoying our heavenly inheritance (Eph. 6:12). This conflict means learning the truth of the Word of God and standing for it, while many try to undermine or degrade it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Priest first. The priest speaks before the officers do. Privilege comes first, then responsibility.

- Grace speaks. The priest was the expression of God's grace. His words carried comfort from God's heart to each soldier.

- No "if." He sets no terms and raises no barriers; grace makes no stipulations. Commentators differ: one reads the threefold promise — He goes with you, fights for you, saves you — as assuming obedience.

- Not strategy. The principle is confidence in the God who brought them out of Egypt — not force, skill, or cunning. A fainting heart only comes from looking at self or the enemy instead of Him. The battle is His, so the end is as sure as the beginning.

- Still true. Our conflict is not against flesh and blood. It is against satanic hostility that would rob us of our heavenly inheritance. We stand by holding to the truth of God's Word.

Deuteronomy 20:3 · Darby

and shall say unto them, Hear, Israel, ye are approaching this day unto battle against your enemies let not your hearts faint, fear not, and do not tremble, neither be afraid of them;

Israel stands in battle order, the enemy in sight, with more horses and chariots on the other side. Before anyone draws a sword, a priest steps out and speaks to their hearts — which raises the question of why a priest, and not a general, goes first.

Privilege before responsibility

Two voices address the army in this chapter, and the order matters. The priest comes first with what God is to them; the officers follow with what God asks of them. One writer asks what would happen if the order were flipped.

There is rare moral beauty in the order in which this passage brings in the priest and the officer. The first speaks for Israel's privileges; the second, for Israel's responsibilities... Now imagine it the other way round. Suppose the people had heard the officer's voice first. What would the result have been? Fear, depression and discouragement! Press responsibility on me before I know where I stand. Ask for my affections before I am in the relationship. That lays an unbearable yoke on my neck. Search from Genesis to Revelation. Without one exception, God's order is privilege first and responsibility second.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A message with no "if" in it

The priest offers nothing in exchange. He does not tell them what to do so that God will come; he tells them God is already with them.

Notice that the priest sets out not one single condition. He states, in the most absolute way, the relationship of the Israel of God and the privilege that comes with it. He does not say, "The Lord your God will be with you, if you do such and such."... Grace sets no conditions, raises no barriers, makes no demands.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. Another writer finds obedience assumed behind the promise, and counts three guarantees in the priest's closing words.

The priest's commission was to encourage them: do not fear, do not tremble, do not let the horses and chariots terrify you. God's assurance was threefold: Jehovah goes with you, to fight for you, to save you. This assumes they would obey. If they obeyed, they had nothing to fear. Victory was on their side.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why the priest, and not a commander

A priest represents God to the people. That is why he is sent to a frightened army: the comfort he brings comes from God's own heart, and it reaches every single soldier.

The priest was the very expression of the grace of God. His service was a stream of precious comfort, flowing from the loving heart of the God of Israel to each single soldier. His loving words aimed to brace the mind for action and to put strength into the weakest arm for the fight. He assures them that God Himself is with them. There is no question, no condition, no "if," no "but."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Where a fainting heart comes from

A sinking heart is not just a mood to pity. It is a symptom: the soldier's eye has moved off God and onto the size of the problem.

The governing principle here, as everywhere else, is confidence in Jehovah. He had taken His people and brought them out of Egypt into relationship with Himself. Now He was putting them in His own land... It was not a question of soldiers or strategy, of force or skill or trickery, but of Jehovah their God... So a fainting heart would be unbearable. It could only come from one thing: the people were thinking not of Jehovah their God, but of themselves or their enemies... What secures victory is knowing that our God calls us to the fight, and that the battle is His, not ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"Fear not" — a word God keeps repeating

This command is not a one-off for one battlefield. The same two words follow God's people through every stage of their history.

This word reaches the ears of God's people every time they face the enemy: in Egypt (Ex. 14:13), in the wilderness (Num. 14:9; Num. 21:34; Deut. 1:21; Deut. 3:2, 22; Deut. 7:18; Deut. 20:3; Deut. 31:6, 8), or in Canaan under Joshua (Joshua 8:1; Joshua 10:8, 25; Joshua 11:6)... And when Israel lay in the "lowest pit" and cried to God in their distress, the Lord answered, "Fear not" (Lam. 3:57).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The fight believers face today

The enemy has changed. The call to fight has not.

Let us remember that believers today are called to fight. The fight is not against flesh and blood. It is against the deceit of a hostile Satan, who wants to keep us from enjoying our heavenly inheritance (Eph. 6:12). This conflict means learning the truth of God's Word and standing for it, against the many attempts to undermine or degrade it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Order. The priest speaks first, then the officers: privilege first, responsibility second. Reverse it and you get fear and discouragement.

- Gift. His message carries no "if" and no "but." God does not negotiate His presence; grace makes no demands.

- Ground. A fainting heart means the eye has moved from Jehovah to self or to the enemy. The fight was never about strategy or numbers.

- Reach. "Fear not" is God's standing word to His people — in Egypt, in the wilderness, in Canaan, and in the lowest pit.

- Result. Three promises hold the line: He goes with you, He fights for you, He saves you. The same fight is ours today, against spiritual enemies who would rob us of our inheritance.

Deuteronomy 20:4 · Darby

for Jehovah your God is he that goeth with you, to fight for you against your enemies, to save you.

Israel faced a land held by stronger armies. The priest's answer to their fear was not a better strategy but a Person going with them.

The Priest Speaks Before the Officers

Two voices spoke to Israel before the fighting, and the order matters.

The reader will notice that as the people came near the battle, the priest was to speak to them first, and the officers second. This order is very beautiful. The priest came forward to unfold to the people their high privileges; the officers came to remind them of their holy responsibilities. Such is the divine order here. Privilege comes first, and then responsibility.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

No "If" in the Promise

Read the priest's words and you find nothing that Israel must first supply.

Notice that the priest proposes not a single condition here. He states in the most absolute way the relationship, and the privilege that flows from it, belonging to the Israel of God. He does not say, "The Lord your God will be with you, if you do such and such." … Grace proposes no conditions, raises no barriers, makes no stipulations. Its language is, "The Lord your God is with you … He goes with you … to fight for you … to save you." When the Lord fights for His people they are sure of victory.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The quotations here follow an older translation, which ends the verse "to save you." The ESV reads "to give you the victory." Commentators also differ on the promise itself. One reads the same threefold assurance as resting on the people's obedience:

The divine assurance was threefold: the Lord goes with you, to fight for you, to save you. This presupposes their obedience. If they were obedient, they had nothing to fear. Victory was on their side. And we too need to fear nothing in our warfare with the wicked spirits (Eph. 6). The Lord is on our side, and if we resist the devil he will flee from us. But if Israel was disobedient and departed from the Lord, He fought against them and their enemies overcame them.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why Numbers Did Not Matter

The enemy's strength was real. What the priest sets against it is not a count of soldiers but the presence of God.

He assures them of the divine presence with them. The Lord God was with them. This surely was enough. It did not matter in the smallest degree how many, how powerful, or how formidable their enemies were. Before the Lord of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel, they would all prove to be like chaff before the whirlwind.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Fear as a Symptom

If everything hangs on God's presence, then fear shows where a soldier's mind has gone.

The governing principle here, as elsewhere, is confidence in the Lord. He had taken His people, brought them out of Egypt into relationship with Himself, and was now placing them in His own land. … It was not a question of soldiery or strategy, of force or skill or trickery, but of the Lord their God. … So faintheartedness would be intolerable. It could only come from one thing: the people were thinking not of the Lord their God, but of themselves or of their enemies. … What secures victory is the certainty that our God calls us to the fight, that it is His battle, not ours. Where that is so, we are as sure of the end as of the beginning.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Battle Christians Fight

Should Christians fight as Israel fought? Mackintosh answers with a comparison.

Only imagine Joshua treating the Canaanites on the principles of Romans 12! It would have been as glaring an inconsistency as it would be for us to act on the principle of Deuteronomy 20. Why is this? Simply because in Joshua's day God was executing judgment in righteousness, whereas now He is dealing in unqualified grace.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A fight remains for Christians, but it is not a fight to get saved.

We are not called to fight for eternal life; we have that as God's free gift before we begin. We are not called to fight for salvation; we are saved before we enter the conflict. … The object we fight for is to make good, maintain, and carry out in practice our heavenly position and character, in the middle of the scenes and circumstances of ordinary human life, day by day.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Presence. The one reason given against fear is that God Himself goes with them — not a bigger army, not better tactics.

- Privilege first. The priest announces what grace has given before the officers ever mention duty — comfort precedes demand.

- No "if." Mackintosh stresses that the priest attaches no condition. Gaebelein reads the same promise as assuming obedience.

- Fear diagnosed. A fainting heart is not weakness of nerve but a mind occupied with self and the enemy instead of God.

- Transferred, not repeated. Christians do not take up Israel's sword. The fight now is with spiritual foes, to live out day by day the heavenly position we already have.

Deuteronomy 20:5 · Darby

And the officers shall speak unto the people, saying, What man is there that hath built a new house, and hath not dedicated it? let him go and return unto his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man dedicate it.

Before Israel fought, two voices spoke to the army. The priest spoke first. Then the officers began sending men home. The first man excused had built a house and not yet moved in. Why would God thin His own ranks over one man's unfinished house?

Why the officer speaks second

The priest speaks first, and the officers follow. One writer sees a deliberate order in that.

There is rare moral beauty in the order in which the priest and the officer come forward here. The priest speaks for Israel's privileges; the officer, for Israel's responsibilities. Notice this: before the officers could speak to the people about responsibility, the priest had settled them in the knowledge of their precious privilege. Imagine the order reversed. Suppose the people had heard the officer's voice first. What would the result have been? Fear, depression and discouragement! To press responsibility on me before I know my position — to ask for my affections before I am in the relationship — lays a crushing yoke on my neck and an unbearable load on my shoulders. This is not God's way. Search from Genesis to Revelation and you will find, without a single exception, that God's order is privilege first and then responsibility.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What "dedicated" means

To dedicate a house means to move in and live in it. The timing matters too: Israel was still outside the land when Moses gave this rule.

After the priest had given his message, the military officers were to excuse certain men from service. If a man had built a house but had not yet dedicated it by living in it, he was excused. The same was true if he had planted a vineyard and had not yet gathered its fruit (vs. 5-6). These two exemptions applied to no one in Israel when Moses spoke, because Israel was not yet in their land. But they would apply once they were in it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

An army of volunteers

These excuses are not a loophole. They show the kind of army God wants.

Since God was with them in this way, there was to be no cowardly fear in their hearts. The man who was afraid could stay at home. God's army must be made up of volunteers, not conscripts. Then, too, a man might have built a new house and not lived in it. Another might have planted a vineyard and not eaten from it. Another might have become engaged to a wife and not yet married her. None of them was to be torn away from what he was pursuing, and no man was to bring homesickness onto the battlefield.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

God notices the individual

The verse gives its own reason: the man might die, and another would dedicate his house. God's care reaches down to one soldier — and, later in the chapter, even to the enemy city.

God sets out His care for His people down to the smallest detail. The man with a new house, the man who had planted a vineyard, the man engaged to be married — each one is provided for. Where fear filled a man's heart, he was made to feel that he was unworthy to enter the Lord's battles. God also shows beautiful care for the enemy. When the army came near the city they were about to attack, they had first to offer it peace — a strange way of making war, but worthy of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Owning is not the problem

So what makes a man unfit? Not the house itself, but its grip on him.

So we learn that two things were essential for everyone who would fight the Lord's battles: a heart completely free from the things of nature and of earth, and a bold, clear confidence in God. "No soldier gets entangled in civilian pursuits, since his aim is to please the one who enlisted him." Being engaged in the affairs of this life is one thing; being entangled by them is quite another. A man could have a house, a vineyard and a wife and still be fit for the battle. These things were not a hindrance in themselves. It was holding them in a way that entangled him that made a man unfit for the fight.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

How a heart is set free

Then how does a soldier get a free heart?

It was not a question of having such things. By no means. The officers had no quarrel with those who owned them. The only point was not to be entangled with them... The main point is to keep the heart free. God's warriors must have free hearts, and the only way to be free is to cast all our care on Him who cares for us. I can stand on the battlefield with a free heart when I have placed my house, my vineyard and my wife in God's keeping.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Priest first. God gives privilege before He presses responsibility. Reverse the order and you get fear and discouragement.

- House unfinished. To dedicate a house is to move into it. The man who has not yet done so goes home, and the rule waits until Israel is in the land.

- Volunteers only. God wants volunteers, not conscripts, and no homesick soldier on the battlefield.

- Care for one man. The law bends down to one soldier's private hopes. Later in the chapter it even offers peace to the enemy city.

- Free hearts win. Owning a house never disqualified anyone. Being entangled did. The cure is to place house, vineyard and wife in God's keeping.

Deuteronomy 20:6 · Darby

And what man is there that hath planted a vineyard, and hath not eaten of it? let him go and return unto his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man eat of it.

Before Israel went to war, God sent home the man who had planted a vineyard and had not yet tasted its fruit. Why would God thin out His own army, and what does an unenjoyed vineyard have to do with being fit to fight?

Who Speaks, and in What Order

The chapter puts two voices before the troops, and the sequence carries weight. The priest speaks first, about Israel's privileges. Only then do the officers mention houses, vineyards and wives.

There is a rare moral beauty in the order in which the priest and the officer appear in this passage. The priest speaks for Israel's privileges; the officer speaks for Israel's responsibilities. How interesting it is to see this: the priest had settled them in the knowledge of their precious privilege before the officers were allowed to speak to the assembly about responsibility. Imagine the case reversed. Suppose the officer's voice had first been heard. What would have been the result? Fear, depression and discouragement!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

An Army of Volunteers

No one was pressed into this service. God let the man with an unharvested vineyard go home, along with the man who had an unfinished house or a bride he had not yet taken.

God's army must be volunteers, not conscripts. Then, too, think of the man who had built a new house and not lived in it, or planted a vineyard and not eaten of it, or become engaged to a wife and not yet taken her. No one was to separate such a man from what he was pursuing. No one was to bring homesickness onto the battlefield.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Kelly traces the same freedom back to God's own honour. God would not win His battles through men who fought only because someone forced them.

The governing principle here, as elsewhere, is confidence in Jehovah. He is the God who had taken His people, brought them out of Egypt into relationship with Himself, and was now placing them in His own land. It would be beneath the honour of God that any should be forced to fight His battles.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Ownership or Entanglement

Nothing here condemns owning a vineyard. Plenty of Israel's soldiers had land and families and fought well. What ruled a man out was the hold the thing still had on him.

Taking part in the affairs of this life is one thing. Getting entangled by them is another. A man might have had a house, a vineyard, and a wife, and yet have been fit for the battle. These things were not a hindrance in themselves. What unfitted a man for the conflict was holding them in a way that tangled him up.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The remedy is not to get rid of the vineyard, but to hand it over.

The main point is to keep the heart disentangled. God's warriors must have free hearts, and the only way to be free is to cast all our care upon Him who cares for us. Once I have placed my house, my vineyard and my wife in God's keeping, I can stand on the battlefield with a free heart.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A Rule for a Land Not Yet Entered

The exemption describes a settled life that Israel had not yet begun. When Moses spoke these words, no one in Israel had a vineyard in the land.

These two exemptions would not apply to anyone in Israel at the time Moses spoke this. Israel was not yet in their land. They would apply once they were in the land.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Warfare It Pictures

The three exemptions together picture what still drags on the heart.

These three cases show us one thing. Attachment to the present things of life will unfit us, to some degree, for the spiritual warfare that belongs to heaven. Today we can put the things of God first, even when we deal with questions of property, food and human relationships. This is not only possible; it is spiritually right.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

We do not fight to gain a standing with God. We fight from one we already have.

We are not called to fight for eternal life; we have received that as God's free gift before we begin. We are not called to fight for salvation; we are saved before we enter the conflict. What we fight for is this: to make good, maintain, and carry out in practice our heavenly position and character. We do this in the middle of the scenes and circumstances of ordinary human life, from day to day.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Priest first. God gives privilege first and duty second. Reverse the order and the army goes home discouraged, not confident.

- Volunteers, not conscripts. God sent the man home instead of marching him out with his heart still in his vineyard.

- Not ownership, entanglement. A vineyard never disqualified anyone. A vineyard that gripped the heart did.

- Free hearts win battles. Hand the vineyard into God's keeping, and you walk onto the field unburdened.

- From victory, not for it. The believer's fight does not buy salvation. It works out a position God has already given.

Deuteronomy 20:7 · Darby

And what man is there that hath betrothed a wife, and hath not taken her? let him go and return unto his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man take her.

Israel's laws of war send three men home: the man with a new house, the man with a new vineyard, and the man engaged to be married. Why does God, on the edge of battle, pause to protect one man's unfinished wedding?

A binding engagement

Betrothal in Israel meant far more than a modern engagement. God gave laws to guard the woman in that position.

The Jews regarded betrothal as just as binding as marriage, and only divorce could end it. God gave certain laws about a betrothed woman. Ex. 21:8-9; Deut. 20:7; Deut. 28:30… The word is also a picture of Jehovah's favour to His ancient people in a future day, when He will "betroth" them to Himself for ever. Hosea 2:19-20.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So the man in this verse is already bound. God will not let the war cut that bond off before he enjoys it.

God's eye on the individual

The chapter is about a nation at war, yet its rules descend to one household at a time.

God shows His care for His people down to the smallest detail. The man with a new house, the man who had planted a vineyard, the man who had betrothed a wife — each one is cared for. And the man whose heart was full of fear was made to feel that he was unworthy to enter the battles of Jehovah.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

War and the enjoyment of the promised land are not allowed to cancel each other out.

In Deuteronomy 20 provision is made to reconcile any war that might arise with the enjoyment of the land and the blessing of God, either individually or in case of conquest.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Volunteers, not conscripts

Notice what the exemption prevents: a soldier standing in the line while his mind is still at home.

Since God was with them in this way, there was to be no cowardly fear in their hearts: the man who was afraid could stay at home. God's army must be volunteers, not conscripts. And if a man had built a new house and not lived in it, if he had planted a vineyard and not eaten from it, if he had betrothed a wife and not taken her, no one was to separate him from what he was pursuing. There was to be no bringing homesickness onto the battlefield.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Engaged, but not entangled

The dismissal is no verdict against marriage or property. One writer draws the line.

There is a very real difference between being engaged in the affairs of this life and being entangled by them. A man might have had a house, a vineyard and a wife, and still have been fit for the battle. These things were not, in themselves, a hindrance. The trouble came when a man held them in a way that turned them into an entanglement, and that unfitted him for the conflict.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer gives the reason behind this third exemption, then turns all three cases on us.

A man who was engaged to be married was also excused, in case he died in battle and so never married. These three cases show us that attachment to the present things of life will unfit us to some degree for the spiritual warfare that belongs to heaven. Today we can put the things of God first even when we have to deal with questions of property, food and human relationships.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Priest before officer

The officers speak these words, and they speak after the priest. One writer sees a deliberate order in that.

How interesting it is to see the order here. Before the officers could speak to the assembly about responsibility, the priest had settled them in the knowledge of their precious privilege. Imagine it the other way round. Suppose the officer's voice had been heard first. What would the result have been? Fear, depression and discouragement! To press responsibility on me before I know my position — to call for affections before I am in the relationship — is to lay an unbearable yoke on my neck.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Something to lose

One writer links these three exemptions to the dismissal of the fearful in the next verse.

The same passage (verses 5-7) teaches us that those who were fearful and afraid were the ones who had something to lose. A servant of God is full of courage for his work when he has nothing to lose here. The excellency of Christ has made him despise what the world values… God wants undivided hearts for the doing of His work — hearts that have nothing to lose and are afraid of nothing.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The cure is not to own nothing, but to hand it all over.

God's warriors must have free hearts. The only way to be free is to cast all our care on Him who cares for us. I can stand on the battlefield with a free heart when I have placed my house, my vineyard and my wife in God's keeping.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Bond — In Israel, betrothal was as binding as marriage. God uses the same word for pledging Himself to His people for ever.

- Care — God guards that bond even in wartime. His laws of war come down to one man's house, vineyard and unfinished wedding.

- Volunteers — He will not drag a homesick heart onto the battlefield. His army is volunteers, not conscripts.

- Unentangled — A house, a vineyard or a wife never disqualified a man. Being entangled by them did.

- Free — Grace speaks before duty does. The heart that has placed all it loves in God's keeping has nothing left to lose, and so it can fight.

Deuteronomy 20:8 · Darby

And the officers shall speak further unto the people, and shall say, What man is there that is timid and faint-hearted? let him go and return unto his house, lest his brethren's heart melt as well as his heart.

Israel is about to go to war, and the officers are sending men home. The last man they dismiss is not the one with unfinished business but the one who is afraid — and they send him away for the sake of the men beside him.

Grace speaks first, then the demand

Two voices speak here. First the priest tells Israel that God goes with them. Then the officers thin the ranks. Commentators say the order matters. A man who first learns where he stands can then hear the demand that follows.

The priest has spoken to us. He has told us of the lasting ground we stand on and the unbreakable relationship we are in. Now we can listen to the one who stands before us and sets out our high and holy responsibilities. If "the officer" had come first, we would have fled from him. The weight and seriousness of his words would have left us discouraged and dismayed.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Fear travels

The command is not there to protect the fearful man. It is there because his fear spreads.

But there was another test, one no other nation would be likely to copy. The officers were to ask if any man was fearful or fainthearted. If so, he was to return home, so that his fear would not infect the other men too (v.8). To show fear before the enemy will only mean defeat. Most of us must admit that we do have fears. But courage will keep us from showing fear, for the Lord is greater than our fears. Confidence in the Lord will give courage to overcome fear.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Volunteers, not conscripts

No one forces the man to stay. God will not drag a divided man onto the field.

Since God was with them in this way, there was to be no cowardly fear in their hearts. The man who was afraid might stay at home. God's army must be volunteers, not conscripts. The same held if a man had built a new house and not lived in it, if he had planted a vineyard and not eaten of it, or if he had promised himself to a wife and not taken her. No one was to tear a man away from what he was pursuing. No one was to bring homesickness onto the battlefield.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What the fainthearted man is holding

The three exemptions before it explain the fear in verse 8. It grows out of what a man is holding on to.

The same passage (vv. 5-7) teaches us that those who were fearful and afraid were those who had something to lose. A servant of God is full of courage for his work when he has nothing to lose here. The excellence of Christ has made him despise what the world values... Sadly, there are many fearful people today, just as there were then. God wants undivided hearts to do His work. He wants hearts that have nothing to lose and that fear nothing. Such hearts cannot spread harm among those who have gone out to war free from the affairs of this life.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What God is after

There is a purpose behind sending men home.

God's great design in His dealings was to teach Israel to trust in Himself. He wants to find in His people a true heart. A true heart makes a strong hand. Having confidence in the Captain of our salvation and not in ourselves, we do not faint at the sight of our enemies.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same two qualifications now

Verses 5–8 form one lesson with two halves.

So we learn that two things were essential for all who would fight the Lord's battles. The first is a heart completely free from the things of nature and of earth. The second is a bold, clear confidence in God... There is a real difference between being busy with the affairs of this life and being entangled by them. A man might have had a house, a vineyard, and a wife, and yet have been fit for the battle. These things were not, in themselves, a hindrance. A man became unfit for the fight only when he held them in a way that tangled him up.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

For the Christian, this fight is not about winning something we do not yet have.

We are not called to fight for eternal life. We have received that as God's free gift, before we begin.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Privilege first. The priest promises God's presence before the officer makes his demand. Reverse the order and the demand only crushes.

- Then the heart. The officers' last question is not about property but about courage. Courage is confidence in the Lord, not in ourselves.

- Fear spreads. The fearful man goes home because his fear infects the men beside him. Fear shown before the enemy means defeat.

- Volunteers only. God builds His army from volunteers, not conscripts. No one tears a man from what he is still pursuing.

- Nothing to lose. The fearful were those with something to lose. The heart that has nothing to lose is the true heart, and a true heart makes a strong hand.

Deuteronomy 20:9 · Darby

And it shall be, when the officers have ended speaking unto the people, that they shall place captains of the hosts at the head of the people.

The priest has spoken and the officers have sent the fearful home. Why does God appoint commanders only now, after thinning His army?

The Law of Battles

These rules for war appear in none of Moses' other books. Their theme is trust, not tactics:

Then in Deuteronomy 20 comes in the law of battles. We have the utmost care taken that they should be in no way conformed to Gentile license. The governing principle here, as elsewhere, is confidence in Jehovah... It would be beneath the honour of God that any should be forced to fight His battles. He would give His people in everything to think of Himself. It was not a question of soldiery or strategy, of force or skill or fraud, but of Jehovah their God... There are no such laws of war in the other books of Moses; they are here only... What secures victory is the certainty that our God calls us to the fight, that it is His battle, not ours: where that is so, we are as sure of the end as of the beginning.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Volunteers, Not Conscripts

The men still standing when the officers stop speaking are there by choice:

Since God was with them in this way, there was to be no cowardly fear in their hearts: the man who was afraid could stay at home. God's host must be volunteers, not conscripts.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Priest Before Officer

The priest speaks first, and the officers come after him:

The order in which this passage brings in the priest and the officer has uncommon moral beauty. The former is the exponent of Israel's privileges; the latter, of Israel's responsibilities... Imagine the case reversed. Suppose the officer had spoken first. What would have been the result? Fear, depression and discouragement! To press responsibility on me before I know my position is to place an unbearable yoke on my neck. So is asking for affection before I am in the relationship.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Free Hearts, Not Empty Hands

What kept a man off the field was not what he owned:

It was not a question of having such things. By no means. Thousands of the men who went out to fight and to gather the spoils had houses and lands and family ties. The officers had no quarrel with the owners of these things. The only point was not to be entangled with them... God's warriors must have free hearts, and the only way to be free is to cast all our care on Him who cares for us. I can stand on the battlefield with a free heart when I have placed my house, my vineyard and my wife in God's keeping.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What the Army Fights For

Mackintosh turns from Israel's war to the Christian's own fight:

We, as Christians, are called to carry on a constant spiritual warfare. We have to fight for every inch of heavenly ground... We are not called to fight for eternal life; we have received that as God's free gift, before we begin. We are not called to fight for salvation; we are saved before we enter the conflict. It is most needful to know what it is that we have to fight for, and whom we are to fight with.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Ranked Under a Captain

Every man now has a captain over him. Here the parallel with human armies breaks down:

There are leaders in this warfare. In Israel, every person was ranked under his captain. But human warfare and spiritual warfare are very different. In man's warfare, the responsibility the leader takes on removes responsibility from those who follow him... In spiritual warfare we may pity such followers, but we cannot admire them. The leader's responsibility removes none of the follower's. If a follower is misled, he is guilty of being misled, and he has compromised not only himself but the whole cause he stands for. He is guilty because God's people have only one Leader who cannot fail, and His voice must be heard everywhere through all the noise of the battlefield. The work of every lesser leader is to make men listen to that Voice. Each of them has to say, "Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ" (1 Corinthians 11:1).

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Privilege before duty. Priest, then officers, then captains. Privilege comes first, then responsibility, then organisation. Reverse it and you get fear.

- Willing before armed. The fearful were sent home. It would be beneath God's honour for anyone to be forced to fight His battles.

- Free before strong. House, vineyard and bride were never forbidden — entanglement was. You free your heart by placing these things in God's keeping.

- Saved before the fight. Christians fight for every inch of heavenly ground, but never for eternal life or salvation. Those come as a free gift before the conflict starts.

- One Leader over all. A captain over you does not carry your responsibility for you. God's people have only one Leader who cannot fail, and every lesser leader exists to make men hear His voice.

Deuteronomy 20:10 · Darby

When thou approachest unto a city to fight against it, thou shalt proclaim peace unto it.

Deuteronomy 20 sets out Israel's law of battle. Its first instruction toward a hostile city is not an attack but an offer. Why would God order a besieging army to begin with a proclamation of peace, and how far did that offer reach?

A strange way to make war

God's care in this law reaches even the enemy Israel is marching against.

He shows beautiful consideration for the enemy. When they came near the threatened city, they were first called to proclaim peace to it. That is a strange way of making war, but one worthy of God. He took no pleasure in war. He would train His people to go out, even to fight, remembering that their own feet were fitted "with the readiness given by the gospel of peace," if I may say so.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Israel could not treat every city the same way.

They had to draw a careful line between two kinds of city. There were the cities far away from them, and there were the cities of the seven nations under judgment. To the first kind they were to make offers of peace before anything else. With the second they were to make no terms at all. "When you draw near to a city to fight against it, offer terms of peace to it" — a marvellous method of fighting!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Mercy built into the rule

The offer was not a formality. It decided whether the people inside lived.

There was a most merciful arrangement, which consisted in an offer of peace to a besieged city. (The cities of the Canaanite nations are not included.) Peace was the first thing proclaimed. If the city accepted the offer, its people kept their lives. If it refused, the people resisted that offer of peace and so showed the wickedness of their hearts. They were resisting God, and Israel besieged the city.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Destruction was never the aim of Israel's warfare.

Indiscriminate slaughter and wholesale destruction formed no part of Israel's business. Cities willing to accept the offered terms of peace had the privilege of becoming tributaries to the people of God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Refusal meant resisting God

Refusing the offer was more than a military decision.

As to the enemy, a besieged town was always to have the offer of peace by submission. If it resisted, it paid the penalty for resisting God, and not merely men. But Israel was to spare those who did not fight.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Kelly measures the judgment against the offer that came first.

The dealing with them is just as serious as the offer of peace made beforehand was real. God's ways are not as ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The one exception

The rule had one limit.

There was one exception. There must be no peace with the Canaanites. They were not feared as rivals; they were doomed to destruction because of their detestable practices and the way they lured others into them. Some, as is well known, find a difficulty here. This may not remove that difficulty, but others may find it worth knowing that, as a picture, the Canaanites stand for the agents of Satan, the spiritual wickedness in heavenly places. With such enemies there can be no terms and no compromise. There ought to be none. The fight must never stop, at any time or in any circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Israel's sword, the Christian's message

What God gave Israel to do is not what He gives His people to do now.

Scripture reveals nothing more plainly than this. The Lord put the sword of judgment into Israel's hands. In certain cases He commanded them to use it with unrelenting severity (Deut. 20:10-18). How different now! God makes those who have come to find in Jesus a Saviour His own ministers of love, of mercy, and of grace to a rebellious world.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Peace first. Before any attack began, the city heard an offer. Kelly calls it a strange way of making war, but one worthy of God.

- Peace saves. If the city accepted, its people kept their lives, and the city became a tributary to the people of God.

- Peace refused. A city that answered with war was resisting God, and not merely men. Its judgment was as serious as the offer had been real.

- Peace limited. The rule covered distant cities only. The nations of Canaan were doomed for their corrupt practices. As a picture they stand for spiritual powers, and with those no compromise is ever right.

- Peace preached. God placed the sword of judgment in Israel's hands. He now sends those who know Christ as Saviour as His ministers of love, mercy and grace to a rebellious world.

Deuteronomy 20:11 · Darby

And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then all the people that are found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee.

Deuteronomy 20:11 sits inside Israel's law of war. Before any fighting, an army had to offer a city peace, and this verse says what followed when the city said yes.

Peace offered before the sword

The command to call out peace comes before any siege is laid. One writer draws attention to how strange this order of events is for an army marching to battle.

He also shows beautiful consideration for the enemy. When Israel came near the threatened city, their first task was to proclaim peace to it. That is a strange way of making war, but it is worthy of God. He took no pleasure in war. He would train His people to go out, even to fight, while they remembered that they themselves were "shod with the preparation of peace," if I may put it that way.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What acceptance secured

The verse sets terms instead of slaughter. Older translations call the survivors "tributaries"; the ESV calls their work "forced labor." One writer shows what such a city gained, and what Israel could keep from a city that refused.

Killing without limit and total destruction formed no part of Israel's business. If any cities were willing to accept the offered terms of peace, they were to have the privilege of becoming tributaries to the people of God. And in those cities that would make no peace, Israel was to keep everything inside the walls that could be put to use.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

When a city refused

One commentator says whom a city was really fighting when it refused, and who was still spared.

As to the enemy, Israel always had to offer a besieged town peace on terms of submission. If the town resisted, it paid the penalty of resisting God, not merely man. But Israel was to spare those who did not fight.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Another writer sets the judgment and the offer side by side.

There is just as serious a dealing with them, in proportion to the reality with which the offer of peace had been made before. God's ways are not as ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The one exception

This law covered distant cities only. The nations already living in the land fell outside it. One writer faces the difficulty readers feel here, and points to what those nations stand for.

There was one exception: there must be no peace with the Canaanites. This was not because Israel dreaded them as rivals. They were doomed to destruction because of their vile practices and the way they lured others into them. It is well known that some find a difficulty in this. It may interest others to know that, read as a picture, the Canaanites represent the agents of Satan, the spiritual wickedness in heavenly places — those rulers of the darkness of this world with whom we are called to wrestle now. They are the powers of evil that keep turning every part of religion into a means of deliberate and ruinous dishonour of God. With such there can be, and ought to be, no terms, no compromise, no stopping of the fight at any time or in any circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A pattern for a future day

One writer finds the same pattern in God's future judgment of the nations.

God will not destroy all the earth in that day. He will destroy only those nations where His witnesses have been, the nations that will then band together against the Lord's anointed. The kingdoms of the world will become the Lord's, and He will not destroy them. The far-off islands will form the procession of Messiah's glory on earth, just as the distant cities and peoples of old were to be left alive to become tributaries to Israel (Deut. 20:10-18). Only those will be cut off who had filled up the measure of their sin and defied God.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Israel's sword, the Christian's errand

One writer puts two commands from the same Lawgiver side by side, and says what changed for God's people.

Scripture reveals nothing more clearly than this: the Lord put the sword of judgment into Israel's hands. He commanded them to use it with unsparing severity in certain cases (Deut. 20:10-18). It was an honour given to them to carry out the judgment that was written, and this will be true of them again, strange as that may sound to our ears. How different it is now! Those who have been led to find in Jesus a Saviour... are made God's ministers of love, of mercy, and of grace to a rebellious world. The same Divine Lawgiver who... said to Saul, "Utterly destroy, and spare them not," now, in the day of salvation, says to His redeemed, "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Peace first. Israel had to offer terms before laying siege — a strange way to make war, yet fitting for a God who took no pleasure in war.

- Peace accepted. Opening the gate did not mean destruction. The city lived, and its people served Israel as tributaries. One writer calls that a privilege, not a punishment.

- Peace refused. A city that fought on was not resisting an army only. It bore the penalty of resisting God, and the judgment was as serious as the offer had been real.

- Peace excluded. The nations already in the land fell outside this rule. Read as a picture, they stand for the powers of evil, with whom no truce is ever right.

- Peace proclaimed today. God once put the sword in Israel's hands, and one day will do so again. Today He sends those who belong to Christ as ministers of love and mercy, told to love their enemies.

Deuteronomy 20:12 · Darby

And if it will not make peace with thee, but will make war with thee, then thou shalt besiege it;

Deuteronomy 20 sets out Israel's rules for war, and verse 12 marks the turning point. A city has heard an offer of peace and has answered with war — and everything that follows hangs on that refusal.

Peace Before the Siege

This verse only makes sense in the light of what comes before it. God told Israel to approach a city first with an offer of peace. Only a refusal opened the way to a siege. One writer sees God's care for the enemy here, and finds His later severity matching how real that offer was:

God shows beautiful consideration for the enemy. When Israel came near the threatened city, they were first told to proclaim peace to it. That is a strange way to make war, but it is worthy of God. He took no pleasure in war... There is just as serious a dealing with the city that refuses, in proportion to the reality with which the offer of peace had been made before. God's ways are not as ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Refusal Means

The peace on offer was peace by submission. To refuse it was to resist more than an army:

As for the enemy, a besieged town was always to have the offer of peace by submission. If it resisted, it suffered the penalty of resisting God, not man merely. But Israel was to spare those who took no part in the fighting. The Canaanites, as under the divine curse, are an exception to this. As for the land, Israel was not to cut down the fruit trees, but leave them to support life.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Limits Set on the Sword

The siege was not a free hand to destroy. One commentator points to both limits: what a city gained by yielding, and the restraint Israel still owed a city that refused:

Killing everyone and destroying everything formed no part of Israel's business. Any city willing to accept the offered terms of peace had the privilege of becoming a tributary to the people of God. And in the cities that would make no peace, Israel was to keep everything inside their walls that could be of use.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same writer looks past the battlefield. He takes the men who fell by the sword as standing for "the positive energy of evil" (C. H. Mackintosh).

The Cities With No Offer of Peace

This rule of peace first, then siege, applied only to distant cities. It left out the nations already living in Canaan. Many readers find that hard, and one commentator faces the difficulty directly:

There was one exception: there must be no peace with the Canaanites. They were not doomed because Israel feared them as rivals. They were doomed to destruction because of their detestable practices, and because they drew others into them. It is well known that some find a difficulty in this... Seen as a picture, the Canaanites stand for the agents of Satan, the spiritual wickedness in heavenly places — those rulers of the darkness of this world we are called to wrestle with now... With such enemies there can be, there ought to be, no terms, no compromise, no stopping of the fight at any time or in any circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Israel's Sword and the Christian's Calling

This chapter puts a sword in the hands of God's people. One writer marks how different things stand now for those who follow Christ. He quotes the two commands below in an older wording than the ESV:

Scripture reveals no truth more clearly than this: the Lord put the sword of judgment into the hands of Israel. He commanded them to use it with unrelenting severity in certain cases (Deut. 20:10-18). It was an honour given to them to carry out the judgment written... How different now! Those who have been led to discover in Jesus a Saviour... are made God's ministers of love, of mercy, and of grace to a rebellious world. The same Divine Lawgiver said to Saul, in full keeping with the age of the law, "Utterly destroy, and spare them not." Now, in the day of salvation, He says to His redeemed, "Love your enemies, bless those who curse you, and do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who mistreat you."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Peace first. Israel had to proclaim terms of peace before any siege. War was God's second word, never His first.

- Peace refused. Verse 12 begins at a refusal. To reject terms sent by God is to resist God, "not man merely," and what follows is as serious as the offer was real.

- Peace limited. Even in war Israel did not destroy everything. A city that yielded lived under tribute, Israel spared those who took no part in the fighting, and the fruit trees stood.

- Peace impossible. The Canaanites received no offer at all, and with the spiritual evil they picture there is still no compromise.

- Peace proclaimed. Israel carried a sword; His redeemed now carry love, mercy and grace to a rebellious world.

Deuteronomy 20:13 · Darby

and when Jehovah thy God delivereth it into thy hand, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword

Deuteronomy 20:13 closes a law of war: Israel had to offer a distant city peace first, and could besiege it only if the city refused. So why does the offer come first, and whose victory is it when the city falls?

Peace offered before the sword drawn

What comes just before this verse sets its severity. Israel had to call out terms of peace to a city before attacking it. One writer notes how strange that is as a way to make war:

He shows beautiful consideration for the enemy too. When they came near the threatened city, they were first told to proclaim peace to it. That is a strange way of making war, but it is worthy of God. He took no pleasure in war... And He deals with a city that refuses just as seriously as the earlier offer of peace was real. God's ways are not as ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Refusal — and who was spared

A besieged city was not simply a victim. It had answered an offer, and its answer decided what came next:

There was a most merciful arrangement: an offer of peace to a besieged city. (The cities of the Canaanite nations are not included.) Peace was the first thing proclaimed. If the city accepted the offer, the lives of its people were saved. If it refused, and the people resisted the call to peace and so showed the wickedness of their hearts in resisting God, the city was besieged. All the males were to be struck with the sword, but the women and little ones were saved.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Not a licence for wholesale slaughter

Israel carried a sword, but not a free hand with it. The law drew lines around what Israel could and could not do:

Indiscriminate slaughter and wholesale destruction formed no part of Israel's business. Any city willing to accept the offered terms of peace was given the privilege of becoming a tribute-paying subject of the people of God. As for the cities that would make no peace, everything inside their walls that could be used was to be kept.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Victory handed over, not won

The verse does not say Israel took the city. It says God gives it into their hand. The whole chapter rests on that dependence:

The governing principle here, as everywhere, is confidence in Jehovah. He had taken His people, brought them out of Egypt into relationship with Himself, and was now placing them in His own land... It was not a question of soldiers or strategy, of force or skill or trickery, but of Jehovah their God... So losing heart could not be tolerated. It could only come from one thing — that the people were thinking not of Jehovah their God, but of themselves or their enemies.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The one case with no offer of peace

This rule covered distant cities only. God dealt with the nations already in the land in another way, and commentators explain that difference in two ways. One writer points to what those nations had become:

These nations had sold themselves to serve demons and idols. Their cup of iniquity was full, and none were to be spared (Deut. 18:9-12). God knew that if they lived on, they would teach Israel the same evils these idolaters were used to (v. 18).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another reads the same exception as a picture for the believer's own conflict:

Seen as a picture, the Canaanites stand for Satan's agents, the spiritual wickedness in heavenly places — the rulers of the darkness of this world that we are called to wrestle with now... With such enemies there can be, and there ought to be, no terms, no compromise, and no ending of the fight at any time or in any possible circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A sword then, a message now

What God commanded Israel here is not what He asks of His people today:

Scripture reveals no truth more clearly than this: the Lord put the sword of judgment into the hands of Israel and commanded them to use it with unrelenting severity in certain cases (Deut. 20:10-18)... How different now! Some have been led to find a Saviour in Jesus, to know the ransom of their souls by His blood, and to receive in Him, risen and glorified, the free gifts of righteousness and eternal life. They are made God's ministers of love, of mercy, and of grace to a rebellious world.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Peace first. The sword never falls on a city that has not first heard terms of peace. The severity matches how real the offer was.

- Peace refused. The siege follows a decision. In turning down the offer the city showed the wickedness of its heart in resisting God. Its men fell; its women and children were spared.

- Peace bounded. Indiscriminate slaughter was no part of Israel's business. Israel kept whatever inside the walls could be used.

- Peace granted by God. God gives the city into their hand. Victory is not a matter of soldiers, strategy or skill, but of Jehovah their God.

- Peace preached. Israel once carried the sword of judgment. Those who know Jesus as Saviour are now God's ministers of love, mercy and grace to a rebellious world.

Deuteronomy 20:14 · Darby

only the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that shall be in the city, all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take as booty for thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which Jehovah thy God giveth thee

This verse ends the rule for a distant city that refused Israel's offer of peace. The fighting men fall, but the women, children, livestock and goods are kept. Why does God limit a war He Himself ordered — and what were His people to do with an enemy's wealth?

The Law of Battles

The instructions in this chapter are not military strategy. One writer notes the care God took to keep Israel from copying how the nations around them fought.

In Deuteronomy 20 comes the law of battles. God takes the utmost care that they should in no way copy the loose ways of the nations. The ruling principle here, as everywhere else, is confidence in Jehovah. He had taken His people, brought them out of Egypt into relationship with Himself, and was now placing them in His own land... It was not a question of soldiers or strategy, of force or skill or trickery, but of Jehovah their God... What secures victory is the certainty that our God calls us to the fight, and that the battle is His, not ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Peace Was Offered First

Verse 14 only applies after a city has refused terms. One writer sees God's own character in that order.

God shows beautiful thoughtfulness even for the enemy. When His people came near the threatened city, they were first told to offer it peace: a strange way of making war, but worthy of God. He took no pleasure in war... "But if it makes no peace with you, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it." He then deals with them just as seriously as the offer of peace had been genuine. God's ways are not our ways.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer says why the penalty was so heavy: a city that refused the offer "suffered the penalty of resisting God, not just men" (Numerical Bible Notes).

Limits on the Killing

The verse spares those who did not fight, and keeps what the city held. That sets a limit on the whole campaign.

Killing everyone and destroying everything formed no part of Israel's business. Cities willing to accept the terms of peace had the privilege of becoming tribute-payers to the people of God. In cities that would make no peace, everything inside the walls that could be used was to be kept.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What the Spoil Was For

Israel did not seize the plunder; they received it. The verse calls it something the LORD gave. Mackintosh sees the goods kept back as whatever could be "turned to account, in the service of God, and of His people" (Mackintosh). He applies that straight to how a believer handles money.

There are things in nature and things of earth that can be used for God; the word of God and prayer sanctify them... If this world's riches come into a Christian's hands, he should put them to work in the service of Christ with care and faithfulness. He should give them out freely to the poor, and to all the Lord's needy workers. In short, he should make them available, in every right and wise way, to further the Lord's work in every area. Otherwise those same riches might crumble into dust in their hands, or turn to rust on their souls. Used this way, they will produce precious fruit.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Limits of This Rule

This rule did not cover the cities inside Canaan. The next verses draw the line.

However, this applied only to cities far from the land of Canaan, not to any of the cities of the land. For those cities God had already commanded Israel to kill the men, women, children and livestock (vv.16-17)... These nations had sold themselves to the worship of demons and idols. Their sin had reached its full measure, and no one was to be spared. God knew that if they lived on they would teach Israel the same evils these idol-worshippers had grown used to.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Sword Then, the Gospel Now

Writers are careful to say that this commission belonged to Israel and not to Christians.

Scripture reveals no truth more plainly than this: the Lord put the sword of judgment into the hands of Israel, and told them to use it without mercy in certain cases (Deut. 20:10-18)... How different it is now! People who have been led to find a Saviour in Jesus... are made God's ministers of love, of mercy, and of grace to a rebellious world. The same Divine Lawgiver who... said to Saul, "devote to destruction all that they have... Do not spare them," now, in the day of salvation, says to His redeemed, "Love your enemies... and pray for those who persecute you."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Peace first. The sword in this chapter is never the opening move; an offer of peace always came before a siege.

- Refusal costs. A city that turned the offer down was resisting God, not just men. God dealt with it as seriously as the offer had been genuine.

- Mercy holds. Even in a war God ordered, Israel could not destroy everything. Israel spared the women, children, livestock and goods.

- Spoil is a gift. The goods were not loot grabbed by soldiers. They were a gift from the LORD, to be used in His service — the same rule that governs money in a believer's hands today.

- Canaan excepted. This rule covered distant cities only. The nations inside the land, whose sin was full, faced a separate sentence, so Israel would not learn their evils.

Deuteronomy 20:15 · Darby

Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities that are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations.

This chapter's rules of war — offer peace, besiege, take spoil — apply only to cities "very far from you." The nations already living in Canaan came under a different rule, which raises the hardest question of the chapter: why two standards?

Two kinds of war

The mercy of the earlier verses stops at the border of the land. One writer gives the reason.

However, this applied only to cities far from the land of Canaan, not to any of the cities of the land. For these, God had already commanded that Israel put the men, women, children and livestock to death (vs.16-17). These nations had sold themselves to the service of demon worship and idolatry. Their cup of iniquity was full, and Israel was to spare no one (Deut.18:9-12). God knew that if these idolaters lived on, they would teach Israel the same evils they were used to (v.18).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Peace proclaimed first

Before besieging a distant city, Israel had to call peace to it first. One writer sees God's own character in that order.

There is also a beautiful consideration on His part for the enemy. When they came near the threatened city, God first told them to proclaim peace to it. It is a strange way of making war, but worthy of God. He took no pleasure in war. Even when His people went out to fight, He would train them to remember that they themselves were "shod with the preparation of peace," if I may put it that way… Yet the dealing with a city that refused was as serious as the offer of peace before it had been real. God's ways are not as ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Nothing swept away without purpose

The verse governs a set of rules that are restrained, not brutal. A city that surrendered became a tributary rather than a ruin.

Indiscriminate slaughter and wholesale destruction formed no part of Israel's business. Any city willing to accept the terms of peace offered to it was to have the privilege of becoming a tributary to the people of God. As for the cities that would make no peace, Israel was to keep back everything within their walls that could be put to use.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The one exception, and what it pictures

Canaan alone was shut out of the offer of peace. One writer gives the reason, and then what those nations picture.

There was one exception: there must be no peace with the Canaanites. They were not feared as rivals. They were doomed to destruction because of their abominations and the way they led others astray. It is well known that some find a difficulty in this. It may interest others… to know that, read as a picture, the Canaanites stand for the agents of Satan, the spiritual wickedness in heavenly places… With such there can be, and there ought to be, no terms, no compromise, and no stopping the fight at any time or under any circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not a rule for Christians

The chapter is often read as though it set a pattern for how God's people should treat enemies today. One writer answers that God acts on a different principle now.

These are the lovely ethics of the church of God: the principles of that heavenly kingdom to which all true Christians belong. Would they have suited Israel of old? Certainly not. Only imagine Joshua acting toward the Canaanites on the principles of Romans 12! It would have been as glaring an inconsistency as for us to act on the principle of Deuteronomy 20. How is this? Simply because, in Joshua's day, God was carrying out judgement in righteousness. Now He is dealing in unqualified grace.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The far-off cities and what is still to come

One writer sees the sparing of distant cities as a picture of God's future dealing with the nations.

It is not all the earth that is then to be destroyed, but only those nations among whom God's witnesses have previously been… The kingdoms of the world shall then become the Lord's, and shall not be destroyed. The islands far off shall form the train of the earthly glory of Messiah, just as the distant cities and peoples of old were to be left alive to become tributaries to Israel (Deut. 20:10-18).

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Distance decides. The milder rules belong to cities far off, never to the nations already holding Canaan.

- Peace comes first. Even against distant enemies, Israel's first move was an offer of peace. God took no pleasure in war.

- Restraint, not ruin. Sweeping slaughter was no part of Israel's task. A city that surrendered became a tributary, and Israel kept whatever could be put to use.

- One exception. Canaan alone was shut out, because of its corruptions and the danger of Israel copying them. Read as a picture, it shows that spiritual evil can never be given terms.

- Grace rules now. Then God was carrying out judgement in righteousness; now He deals in unqualified grace. The cities once spared still hint at nations one day brought under Messiah's reign.

Deuteronomy 20:16 · Darby

But of the cities of these peoples which Jehovah thy God giveth thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth,

Deuteronomy 20 sets out Israel's law of war, and here the rules change: Israel could offer peace to distant cities, but not to the cities of the land God was giving them. This raises a hard question — why would a good God give such an order, and what does it say to readers today?

Two Rules, Not One

Israel's normal way of war was to offer terms first. Even in a siege, the chapter limited what Israel could destroy.

Indiscriminate slaughter and wholesale destruction formed no part of Israel's business. Any city willing to accept the offer of peace was given the privilege of paying tribute to the people of God. And in a city that refused peace, everything inside the walls that could be used was to be kept.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The nations of the land are the one exception, and the reason given is not military.

There was one exception: there must be no peace with the Canaanites. They were not feared as rivals. They were doomed to destruction for their vile practices and for luring others into them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Centuries of Patience First

God did not act against a people He had ignored. He waited, and Scripture records how long.

Already in Genesis 15:16 God had said to Abraham: "For the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete." The Amorites were one of the main nations of Canaan. The Canaanites worshipped idols called Baal ("Lord"), Moloch ("King") and Astaroth ("Spouse"), and that worship went with dreadful moral excesses such as child sacrifice and prostitution. And yet God showed grace towards these nations for more than 400 years.

Modernised from Arend RemmersOriginal wording

That guilt is what answers the complaint — and God held His own people to the same standard.

No nation on earth was such a breeding ground for every kind of corruption among men, and for all wickedness and abomination in the sight of God, as the Canaanites whom God devoted to destruction... Far from passing over His own people, God never dealt with any nation as strictly as with Israel. Every soul of Israel perished in the wilderness except the two spies... where can men justly complain of the doom that fell on such corrupters of the race?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Executioner, Not Conqueror

Israel was not grabbing land it wanted. God handed Israel a task, and the task carried a lesson.

Israel was in this respect only the executioner of divine judgment, not of their own passion or greed for gain. He could have destroyed them Himself by plague or famine. Instead He chose Israel to do it, and so taught His people the most solemn lesson He could give them, in the holiness of His own nature, and in what sin is before Him. They themselves would incur similar awful judgments if they followed them in their sin.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The Charge of Cruelty

Some readers object that this order is cruel. One writer answers by holding two truths about God together.

Opponents of Scripture have sometimes attacked the severity of the LORD's orders to Israel about their enemies. If God is love, why would He tell His people to act like this? The answer is very simple: "God is light," as well as love. The nations in and around Canaan were so soaked in terrible evils that they were a moral ulcer in the middle of the earth. It was mercy to others, and righteousness in God, to destroy them completely, after bearing with them so patiently. How much of a cancer does a skilled surgeon's knife spare?

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What Sparing Them Cost

Israel did not carry the order out, and the survivors cost them dearly.

They left many alive who should have been destroyed. Those spared became the wretched instruments of Israel's own ruin, leading Israel into the very sins that had called so loudly for divine judgement.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Not Our Commission

No reader today is handed a sword. This command belonged to one people at one point, and Christians are given the opposite order.

The same Divine Lawgiver, in full keeping with the age of law, told Saul to destroy Amalek utterly and to spare none. Now, in the day of salvation, He says to His redeemed, "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What stays with us is the picture. These nations stand for an enemy believers still face.

Seen as a picture, the Canaanites stand for the agents of Satan — the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places, the rulers of this present darkness whom we are called to wrestle with now... With them there can be, and ought to be, no terms, no compromise, and no letting up in the fight, at any time or in any circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Limited — This is not a rule for war in general. Israel could offer distant cities peace and take them as tributaries. Only the nations of the land itself were to be destroyed.

- Deserved — God waited more than 400 years while the guilt of these nations filled up. He bore with child sacrifice and prostitution before He acted.

- Delegated — Israel struck as the executioner of God's judgment, not out of greed. In carrying it out, Israel learned what sin looks like to a holy God.

- Consistent — The same God let a whole generation of His own people die in the wilderness. He shows no favourites.

- Costly — Israel spared nations it was told to destroy. Those survivors dragged Israel into the very sins that had condemned them. No such sword is given today; Christians are told to love their enemies.

Deuteronomy 20:17 · Darby

but shalt utterly devote them to destruction, the Hittites and the Amorites, the Canaanites and the Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites, as Jehovah thy God hath commanded thee;

Six nations are named here, and Israel is told to leave none of them alive — a command that has troubled readers ever since. Commentators ask what "devote" means, why these nations, and why God used Israel's sword instead of His own hand.

Not Rivals, but Usurpers

The chapter as a whole sets out how Israel was to make war, and this verse marks off the one group with whom no terms were possible. The reason was not that Israel wanted the land for itself.

In Deuteronomy 20 we see how the fear of Jehovah controlled war, both inside and outside. It was not a rival to be got rid of, but the corrupt races who in fact held the land, to be destroyed by and for Israel, to whom the land was divinely given.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Meaning of "Devote to Destruction"

The phrase "devote them to complete destruction" is a legal term in Israel's law. It belongs to the language of vows, not to the language of battle.

Living things could be vowed to Him in two ways. They could be consecrated to Him in life. Or, under certain conditions, they could be devoted to Him forever. This second kind of vow is called cherem. Men, animals and fields could be devoted in this way, and for these no redemption was permitted. In the case of people, such a vow was probably meant to affect only the enemies of God and of Israel. Their death was the only possible way to fulfil it. The Canaanites are an example of this (Deuteronomy 20:17).

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why These Nations, and Why Now

Commentators point back four hundred years to God's word to Abraham. This was not the first time God had swept away a whole society.

The first case was of course the flood. Humanity was then wiped off the face of the earth, apart from eight souls. The second was the destruction of the cities of the plain, including Sodom and Gomorrah. Only righteous Lot and two daughters were saved. On both these occasions the destruction was an act of God — by water, and by fire and sulphur. In both cases human corruption had risen so high that it could no longer be tolerated. This was now the case with the Amorite nations. Some four hundred years earlier Abraham had been told, "the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet complete" (Genesis 15:16), but now it clearly was complete.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

God's Justice in Israel's Hand

God could have used plague or famine, as He had used water and fire before. He chose Israel's hands instead.

Israel was in this respect only the executioner of divine judgment, not of their own passion or greed for land. He might have destroyed them by plague or famine. Instead He chose Israel to carry out this task. In doing so He gave His people the most solemn lesson they could receive: the holiness of His own nature, and what sin is before Him.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Some ask whether such a command is worthy of God at all. One writer answers by pointing at the Canaanites themselves, and at how God treated Israel.

Of all the nations on earth, none was such a breeding ground for every kind of corruption among men, and for all wickedness in the sight of God, as the Canaanites whom God devoted to destruction. So, as far as righteousness goes, it was perfectly just to hold these Canaanites up as a solemn warning to all the world and for all time. In the last lecture we saw that, far from passing over His own people, God never dealt with any nation as strictly as with Israel. Every soul of Israel died in the wilderness except the two spies who stood for God, even against their fellows as well as against the crowd. If God let all Israel fall in the wilderness for their sins, and did not spare even the single fault of Moses, how can anyone justly complain about the doom that fell on such corrupters of the human race?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

When Israel Spared Them

Israel did not carry out the command. Commentators trace Israel's later history straight back to that failure.

It was a high honour put on Israel to wipe out those guilty nations. They proved themselves completely unworthy of that honour, because they failed to do as they were commanded. They left alive many who should have been utterly destroyed. The peoples they spared became the miserable instruments of Israel's own final ruin. They led Israel into the very sins that had called so loudly for divine judgment.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Picture for Believers Today

Some readers still find this command hard. One writer offers a further angle: what these nations picture.

Seen as a picture, the Canaanites stand for the agents of Satan — the spiritual wickedness in heavenly places. They are the rulers of the darkness of this world, and we are called to wrestle with them now. In particular, they are the powers of evil that keep turning every link of religion into a means of deliberate and ruinous dishonour to God. With such enemies there can be no terms and no compromise, and there ought to be none. The fight must never stop, at any time or under any possible circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Devoted. The command uses the language of a vow — cherem, something handed over to God for ever, with no buying back.

- Ripened. These nations were not judged early. Abraham was told their iniquity was "not yet complete"; by now it was, as with the flood and Sodom before.

- Executioner. Israel carried out God's sentence, not its own greed — and learned along the way what sin looks like to a holy God.

- Spared. Israel left many alive. Those spared peoples then dragged Israel into the same sins, and into ruin.

- No terms. Read as a picture, these nations stand for the spiritual powers we wrestle with. With them, compromise is never an option.

Deuteronomy 20:18 · Darby

that they teach you not to do according to all their abominations, which they have done unto their gods, so that ye sin against Jehovah your God.

Moses has just set out two rules for war: Israel could offer peace to far-off cities, but not to the nations living in the land. This verse gives the reason — those nations would teach Israel their practices, and Israel would sin against the Lord.

The Reason God Gives

One writer links the severity to what these nations had become, and to what they would pass on:

The offer of peace applied only to cities far from the land of Canaan, not to any city inside it. For those cities, God had already commanded that men, women, children and livestock should all be killed (vv. 16-17). These nations had sold themselves to demon worship and idolatry. Their sin had reached its full measure, and none were to survive. God knew that if they lived on, they would teach Israel the same evils these idolaters had grown used to (v. 18).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Israel the Executioner, Not the Judge

Israel held the sword, but the sentence was God's, not theirs. The command also taught Israel something about God Himself:

The land itself was vomiting them out because of their detestable practices. In this Israel was only the executioner of God's judgment. They were not acting out of their own passion or greed for land. God could have destroyed these nations by plague or famine. Instead He chose Israel to carry it out. In this way He gave His own people the most solemn lesson possible: the holiness of His own nature, and what sin is before Him. They would face the same terrible judgments themselves if they followed these nations into their sin. Their vile gods of lust and murder were the full outcome and expression of that sin.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The One Exception to the Offer of Peace

Every other city heard an offer of peace first. Canaan alone did not, and some readers find that hard. One writer answers by pointing to what these nations picture:

There was one exception. There was to be no peace with the Canaanites. The reason was not that Israel feared them as rivals. They were doomed to destruction because of their vile practices and the way they lured others into them. It is well known that some find this hard to accept... Seen as a picture, the Canaanites stand for Satan's agents — the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places, the cosmic powers over this present darkness, whom we are called to wrestle with now. They are the very powers of evil that keep twisting every connection with religion into a deliberate and ruinous insult to God. With enemies like these there can be, and ought to be, no terms, no compromise, and no pause in the fight at any time or in any circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Warning Came True

The verse was a warning as much as a reason. Israel never carried the command through, and what followed matched that warning:

God gave Israel a high honour in making them destroy those guilty nations. Israel proved completely unworthy of it, because they did not do what He commanded. They left many alive who should have been destroyed. Those spared people became the miserable tools of Israel's own ruin. They led Israel into the very sins that had cried out for God's judgement.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Not a Rule for Christians to Copy

The same writer says plainly that this chapter is not a rule for Christians today. He puts the difference in what God is doing in each period:

These are the lovely ethics of the church of God: the principles of the heavenly kingdom that all true Christians belong to. Would they have suited Israel long ago? Certainly not. Just imagine Joshua treating the Canaanites by the principles of Romans 12! That would have been as glaring a contradiction as it would be for us to act on the principle of Deuteronomy 20. Why the difference? In Joshua's day God was carrying out judgement in righteousness. Now He is dealing in pure grace. The principle on which God acts is the great moral guide for His people in every age.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Temptation to Spare Part of the Evil

If the enemy is now a spiritual one, the pull to leave part of it standing is still strong. We bargain with ourselves over how much of the evil has to go:

This is just how the poor heart likes to reason. So we often deceive ourselves when we must judge and abandon what is evil. We persuade ourselves that holding something back is right. We imagine we can pick and choose and make some distinction. We will give up some of the evil, but not all. We are ready to burn the wood of the idol, but spare the gold and silver.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Taught — the danger named here is teaching, not rivalry. These nations would train Israel in their practices, so the ban shut the infection out.

- Full — their sin had reached its limit. Israel carried out God's sentence and did not act out of its own greed.

- Terms — Israel offered far-off cities peace first. Canaan alone got none, because what these nations picture allows no compromise, ever.

- Spared — Israel disobeyed and left survivors. Those survivors became the tools of Israel's own ruin, just as this verse warned.

- Now — this chapter is not a Christian's rule of conduct. God judged then; He deals in grace now. What stands is to spare no part of the evil we must judge.

Deuteronomy 20:19 · Darby

When thou shalt besiege a city many days, in making war against it to take it, thou shalt not destroy the trees thereof by lifting up an axe against them; for thou canst eat of them; and thou shalt not cut them down, for is the tree of the field a man that it should be besieged?

Deuteronomy 20 is a chapter of war laws, and it ends by protecting trees. An army in a siege needs timber. God still puts the fruit tree off limits, and the reason He gives ties that tree to human life.

The chapter's governing principle

The war laws of this chapter all point back to one thing: who the fighting really depends on.

Then in Deuteronomy 20 comes the law of battles. The greatest care is taken that they should in no way copy the loose ways of the nations. The governing principle here, as elsewhere, is confidence in the Lord. He had taken His people, brought them out of Egypt into relationship with Himself, and was now placing them in His own land... It was not a question of soldiery or strategy, of force or skill or fraud, but of the Lord their God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Mercy toward the enemy and the land

The tree law comes last in a series of limits. Israel may eat from the trees, but may not swing an axe at them.

As to the enemy, a besieged town was always to have the offer of peace by submission. If it resisted, it suffered the penalty of resisting God, not man only; but they were to spare those who were not fighting. This does not apply to the Canaanites, who were under God's curse. As to the land, they were not to cut down the fruit trees, but leave them to support life.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The smallest matter is not beneath Him

God is judging His enemies — and in the same breath He gives a law about a single tree.

When Israel did besiege a city, God showed His care, even if it was only for a tree good for human food. He bound that care by His own hand on His people, in the middle of the very war that showed His face was set against the enemies of His glory in the world. Even there He would not let them act without thought where there was any food fit for people to eat... Such is God. He acts in time as He plans from eternity to eternity. Yet He stoops to speak to His people, and to exercise their thoughts about the smallest matters of this life.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why a tree is called man's life

The ESV asks it as a question: is a tree a man, that you should besiege it? Older translations give a reason instead — "the tree of the field is man's life." Writers take that phrase as a picture of fruitfulness.

Trees were not common in the landscape of Palestine, and because they were few they stood out all the more. Scripture builds various striking word-pictures on them... A tree stands for fruitfulness; and from this point of view Scripture called the tree of the field "man's life."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same principle in the hands of Jesus

One writer ties this siege law to the scene after Jesus fed the crowd.

They were the food of life, the plants of the field, which God had given to man for his life. And life is a sacred thing... "The tree of the field is man's life," the law had said... It would have been waste, it would have been irreverence, to abuse the food of life, which was God's gift. And Jesus, in the same purity, in the perfectness of God's living order, would not let the fragments lie on the ground. "Gather up the leftover fragments," He said, "that nothing may be lost."

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

That reading turns the verse into a rule for ordinary households, not just armies.

We should guard against all reckless waste of anything people could use... It is painful at times to see the sinful waste of human food. People throw out as scraps many a thing that might supply a welcome meal for a needy family... We may be sure that to waste any creature of God is displeasing in His sight.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Fruit trees and siege timber

The next verse lets Israel cut down trees that bear no fruit for the siege works. One writer applies that distinction to how we handle Scripture.

Fruit trees are for man's nourishment, not for judgment. So, in the Word of God there are truths for nourishing and building up. But other truths are for pulling down strongholds (2 Cor. 10:4). It is important that we use the truth for the purpose that God intends, not to misuse it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Trust — The war laws of this chapter rest on confidence in God rather than on force, skill, or fraud.

- Limits — That trust shows up as restraint. Israel had to offer peace first, spare those who were not fighting, and leave the fruit trees standing.

- Care — Even while judging His enemies, God gives a law about one tree. He stoops to train His people's thoughts in the smallest matters of life.

- Life — Scripture calls the tree man's life because it feeds people. Food is God's gift, and abusing it is both waste and irreverence.

- Nothing lost — Jesus kept the same rule when He gathered up the leftovers. It reaches the kitchen that throws out what could feed a hungry family.

Deuteronomy 20:20 · Darby

Only the trees which thou knowest are not trees for meat, thou mayest destroy and cut them down, and build bulwarks against the city that maketh war with thee, until it fall.

Israel's laws of war end with a permission: the army may cut down trees, but only trees that bear no food, and only to build works for the siege. Why does God make a rule about trees while a city is falling?

Rules for Fighting in God's Land

This chapter tells Israel how to fight once they enter the land God gave them. One writer sums up its purpose:

In Deuteronomy 20 God makes provision so that any war that arises can go together with the enjoyment of the land and the blessing of God, whether for one person or in a conquest. He also gives directions to secure the presence of the power of God, and to show how Israel was to treat the enemies according to the mind of God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Care for a Tree in the Middle of a Siege

The verse works by a distinction. You may cut down the trees you know bear no food; the rest stay standing. God draws that line while an army is at work.

When Israel besieged a city, God showed His care, even if it was only for a tree good for human food. He bound that care by His own hand on His people, even while proving that His face was set against the enemies of His glory in the world. Even there He would not allow them to act without thought where there was any food fit for human use. "Only the trees that you know are not trees for food you may destroy and cut down"; but God absolutely forbade cutting down those that supplied food. Such is God. He acts in time as He plans from eternity to eternity. Yet He stoops to speak to His people, and to exercise their thoughts about the smallest matters of this life.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Food Trees Are Spared

Food trees are spared because their fruit is God's gift for human life. One writer sets that beside the Lord's care for scraps of bread after He fed the crowd:

If the lavish service of the heart or hand in worship is no waste, then the very crumbs of human food are sacred. They must not be thrown away. On one occasion He defended the spending of three hundred silver coins. On another He would not let the fragments of three loaves lie on the ground. In His eyes such fragments were sacred. They were the food of life, the herb of the field, which God had given to man for his life... It would have been waste, it would have been irreverence, to abuse in this way the food of life, which was God's gift.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

What the Permitted Axe Teaches

The verse does not forbid cutting trees. It aims the axe at timber that feeds no one, and turns that timber into siege works. One writer draws the same line across two kinds of truth in Scripture:

In besieging a city, no fruit trees were to be cut down for use in the attack (v.19). Trees that did not bear fruit could be used for this (v.20). Fruit trees are for man's nourishment, not for judgment. So, in the Word of God there are truths for nourishing and building up. But other truths are for pulling down strongholds (2 Cor. 10:4). It is important that we use the truth for the purpose God intends, and not misuse it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

"Until It Falls"

The siege presses on until the city falls. Israel could offer the Canaanite nations no terms at all. One writer reads that refusal as a picture:

There was one exception: there must be no peace with the Canaanites. Israel did not dread them as rivals; God had doomed them to destruction because of their vile practices and the way they drew others astray... Seen as a picture, the Canaanites represent the agents of Satan, the spiritual wickedness in heavenly places — those rulers of the darkness of this world with whom we are called to wrestle now... With such there can be, and there ought to be, no terms, no compromise, no ending of the fight at any time or under any circumstances.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Habit It Trains

The same care about waste reaches past ancient warfare into ordinary life:

"Let nothing be lost" is the Master's own word to us — a word that should always be remembered. "Everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected." We should carefully guard against all reckless waste of anything that can be put to human use... Many a thing is thrown out as rubbish that might supply a welcome meal for a needy family... We may be sure that to waste any creature of God is displeasing in His sight. Let us remember that His eye is upon us.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- War, ordered. The chapter's aim is to keep war from spoiling Israel's enjoyment of the land and God's blessing on them.

- The axe, limited. Even while His face was set against His enemies, God fenced off the food-bearing trees by His own hand.

- The reason, sacred. Food is God's gift for human life, and wasting it is irreverence.

- The timber, used. What feeds no one becomes siege works. In the same way, some truth nourishes and other truth pulls down strongholds.

- The siege, finished. With the powers of evil there are no terms and no truce; the fight goes on until the city falls.