Deuteronomy 14:22–29

Deuteronomy 14:22 · Darby

Thou shalt truly tithe all the increase of thy seed, the produce of the field, year by year.

Moses is preparing Israel for life in a land they do not yet own. A tenth of every harvest there belonged to God, and the chapter explains why a tenth, where it went, and why God ties it to joy.

Who owns the field

The tenth was not a tax on Israel's property. It was a yearly admission that the property was never theirs to begin with.

Israel's worship rested on one grand foundation: they themselves and their land belonged to Jehovah. The land was His, and they held it as tenants under Him. At set times they had to bear witness to this precious truth by tithing their land faithfully... They were to own no other landlord but the Lord their God. All they were and all they had belonged to Him.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One writer passes on the saying of an old Jewish teacher:

The law of tithes also taught Israel that they held their land from the Lord. The tithe was like rent paid by a tenant. So Rabbi Bechai says on Deuteronomy 14:23, "If you pay the tithe, then it is your grain; if not, it is mine" (that is, the Lord's).

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Which tithe this is

Elsewhere the tenth goes to the Levites, the tribe that served at the sanctuary and owned no land. Here the farmer eats it himself. Commentators account for the difference.

The tithe spoken of here is one of the extra laws of Deuteronomy. It is a second tithe, not the first, which belonged to God alone. The man whose land was tithed ate this one at the sanctuary, with his household and the Levite, who was never to be forgotten. So he comes up to own God's mercies before Him and enjoy them with God.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Rent paid in gladness

Notice where the tenth had to go, and the mood God attached to the meal.

In the direction in Deuteronomy, they take it up to where God's name is, to eat it there. The object is to centre their faith on Jehovah, and to tie that to joy and grace... they carried a tithe of their own part of the produce, and ate it, inviting others — the Levite among them... They paid their rent to Jehovah for their land, but in joy and gladness, in grace from Him, and with the poor, while still feeding their families with it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The alternative to eating before God was eating alone, and God ruled that out:

The Lord desired them to rejoice before Him rather than to consume their produce with selfish greed, apart from God's presence.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Year by year, at one place

The tenth came round every harvest, and it had to travel to the place God chose for His name.

To those who did not know the God of Israel, and cared nothing about Him, it might all seem strange and puzzling. They saw the people travelling — many of them a long way from their homes — carrying their tithes to one particular spot... "Why not eat at home?" they might say. But the simple fact is, such persons knew nothing whatever about the matter... Suppose an Israelite had deliberately decided to stay at home, or to go to some place of his own choosing. He would have met neither Jehovah there, nor his brothers, and so he would have eaten alone.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The joy spreads outward

Every third year the tenth stayed home and fed those with no land of their own. Giving and sharing are not the same thing.

Not simply given to them, but shared with them — a deeper thing. Christ does not give merely, that we may carry it away from Him; He shares. This is fellowship.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What a tenth admits

A tenth is a token, and a token points past itself to the whole.

Tithes mean that the person they are paid to has the right to the whole. In the same way God has the right to all that we have, and yet in grace He accepts what we give Him. King David, thankful in heart, exclaimed, "For all things come from you, and of your own have we given you" (1 Chronicles 29:14). One hundred per cent comes from Him, even if we render to Him a tenth.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Which is why the arithmetic changes for the Christian:

When our souls get entangled in these things, we forget we are but stewards. The Jew, in giving one-tenth of his property to the Lord, counted the remaining nine-tenths his own. Not so the Christian. We are not our own, and all we have belongs to Him... It is a positive luxury to put all into His disposing hands.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Owner — The tenth was rent, not charity: the land was the Lord's, and Israel farmed it as tenants under Him.

- Gift — This tithe is a second tenth, not the Levites' portion. The giver ate it himself, owning God's mercies and enjoying them with Him.

- Place — Israel had to carry it to the one spot God chose. Staying home meant eating alone, apart from both God and His people.

- Reach — The joy could not stay private. Every third year it fed the landless, the stranger, the fatherless and the widow. Israel shared it with them, and did not just hand it over.

- Result — A tenth confesses that God has a claim on all ten tenths. For the Christian the confession goes further: we are not our own, and everything we hold is His.

Deuteronomy 14:23 · Darby

And thou shalt eat before Jehovah thy God, in the place which he will choose to cause his name to dwell there, the tithe of thy corn, of thy new wine, and of thine oil, and the firstlings of thy herds and of thy flocks; that thou mayest learn to fear Jehovah thy God continually.

This verse ties three things together: a tenth of the harvest, one place of God's choosing, and a lesson the worshipper must learn. The striking part is what happens to the tithe. The man who brings it eats it himself, in God's presence.

The land belongs to God

The command to tithe rests on a claim of ownership. Israel farmed ground that was never theirs outright, and the yearly tenth was how they said so.

Israel's worship rested on one great foundation: they themselves and their land belonged to Jehovah. The land was His, and they held it as tenants under Him. Again and again they were called to bear witness to this precious truth by faithfully tithing their land... They were to own no other landlord but the Lord their God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One Jewish teacher put the same truth in blunt terms.

The rule of tithes also taught Israel that they held their land from the Lord. The tithe was like rent paid by a tenant. Rabbi Bechai says on Deuteronomy 14:23, "If you pay the tithe, then it is your grain; if not, it is mine" (that is, the Lord's).

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The worshipper eats his own offering

Elsewhere the tithe supports the Levites, the tribe set apart for God's service. Here the picture changes.

The law in Israel required everyone to tithe all the increase of whatever kind — grain, wine or oil, or the firstborn of their flocks and herds. In Numbers 18:21 we read that Israel gave all the tithes to the Levites for their support, and that the Levites had to give a tenth of the tithes to the Lord. Yet it seems here in Deuteronomy 14 that the people were allowed to eat of their tithes "before the LORD your God," sharing those tithes with the Levites.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The giver does not send his gift in by someone else. He sits at God's table.

Here it was not the priests opening a way for the people to draw near to God. The offering honoured God. God enjoyed the piety of the people, and the people themselves offered with joy. The people themselves enjoyed the privilege. They sat before God Himself at the same table, in the joy of communion with Him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

One place, chosen by God

The meal has an address. God's people gather where He records His name.

They were to gather to the place where Jehovah recorded His Name. Precious privilege for all who truly loved that glorious Name! We see here, as in many other parts of God's word, how much importance He gave to these regular gatherings of His people around Himself. Blessed be His Name! He delighted to see His beloved people gathered in His presence, happy in Him and in one another. They rejoiced together in what they shared, and fed in sweet and loving fellowship on the fruit of Jehovah's land.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Refusing every other place could look small-minded. Mackintosh answers that charge:

Was this narrowness and bigotry? No, it was the fear and love of God. If Jehovah had appointed a place where He would meet His people, surely His people should meet Him there.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Learning to fear Him always

The verse gives the aim of the whole arrangement: to learn the fear of God. That fear grows as we live aware of His presence.

Let us seek to live in the consciousness that we are in the immediate presence of God. Then we will be kept from a thousand forms of evil that we meet day by day... In a word, the holy fear of the Lord, which Scripture speaks of so often, would hold back evil thoughts, evil words, evil ways — evil in every shape and form.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Blessings enjoyed without leaving the Giver

Why must the produce be eaten in that one place? So the gift is never separated from the Giver. Canaan was the land God promised Israel.

In the earlier books, worship was a matter of how near you came to God in His sanctuary. Here it is the thankful enjoyment of blessings received according to promise. They are enjoyed only before Jehovah, so that they are never detached from Him, and enjoyed in the spirit of grace... For us there is no such difference. The most holy place is our Canaan, and in Spirit we are there. What we enjoy is what is there as the fruits of promise.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Owner. The land was God's and Israel farmed it as tenants; the yearly tenth was the rent that admitted it.

- Place. They paid that rent where God set His name — one centre of His choosing, not one of theirs.

- Table. There the giver ate his own tithe, seated before God in communion, with no priest needed to carry it in for him.

- Fear. We learn the fear of the Lord by living in His presence, and that fear holds back evil thought, word and way.

- Grace. Enjoy His blessings in front of the Giver, never away from Him — and for us that place is the most holy place, where in Spirit we already are.

Deuteronomy 14:24 · Darby

And if the way be too long for thee, so that thou art not able to carry it, because the place is too far from thee, which Jehovah thy God will choose to set his name there, when Jehovah thy God blesseth thee;

Israel had to bring a tenth of every harvest to one place God chose. This verse meets the family living too far away to carry it — so why only one place, and what does God do when obedience is out of reach?

Why a tenth at all

The rule rests on a claim of ownership. Israel farmed land that was not theirs to begin with, and the yearly tenth was how they said so out loud.

Israel's worship rested on one foundation: both they themselves and their land belonged to the Lord. The land was His, and they held it as tenants under Him. At set times God called them to bear witness to this precious truth by faithfully tithing their land... They were to own no other landlord but the Lord their God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The payment was real, but the manner of it was unlike any rent day.

They carried a tithe of their own portion of the fruit, and ate it, inviting others — the Levite among them. It was a way of using part of their produce in rejoicing, and showing grace before the Lord. This was how they paid their rent to the Lord for their land. But they paid it in joy and gladness, in grace from Him, and with the poor, while feeding their families with it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Not the same tithe as in Numbers

This tithe is easy to confuse with the tithe given to the Levites. Commentators keep the two apart.

There were three sets of tithes. The first is in Numbers 18. It did not go to the priests directly. The people gave the increase of their fields to the Levites, and the Levites gave a tenth of these tithes to the priests... But in Deuteronomy 12 and 14 you get nothing of that. The people take the tithes, their peace offerings, and so on, and they go up to one place. All their social enjoyment was to be religiously connected with the place where God had put His name. They were to go up to Jerusalem, a leading principle in Deuteronomy to keep them from idolatry.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The place was God's choice, not theirs

The journey was long because God fixed one meeting place. Some might call that narrow.

All the faithful in Israel were sure to be found at the one divine centre, and nowhere else. You would not find such people making excuses for staying at home. Nor would you find them running here and there to places of their own or other people's choosing. No, you would find them gathered where the Lord is, and there alone. Was this narrowness and bigotry? No, it was the fear and love of God. If the Lord had appointed a place where He would meet His people, surely His people should meet Him there.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

God removes the obstacle

God does not cancel the journey for the distant farmer. The verse ties the problem to His blessing: a big harvest and a long road. He removes what made the trip impossible.

If they lived a long way from Jerusalem, they could sell the tenth of their produce for money. They brought that money to Jerusalem and spent it there on whatever food they wanted to eat "before the Lord." The Lord wanted them to rejoice before Him, not to eat up their produce with selfish greed, away from God's presence.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The arrangement shows God's own heart.

This is perfectly beautiful. The Lord, in His tender care and thoughtful love, took account of everything. He would not leave a single difficulty in the way of His beloved people as they gathered around Himself. He had His own special joy in seeing His redeemed people happy in His presence.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What men later did with the kindness

Good arrangements can be abused, and this one was.

The trading and money-changing in the temple had no doubt grown out of the kindly arrangements of the law recorded in Deuteronomy 14:24-26. Ungodly men had taken advantage of this provision to turn the temple courts into a den of thieves. God intended His temple to be the house where men drew near to Him with their requests. Its keepers had turned it into a place where men were swindled, and so the name of God was slandered.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Ownership. The tenth confessed that the land and the farmer both belonged to the Lord; Israel had no other landlord.

- Enjoyment. This tithe was not handed over and lost. The offerer ate it with his household, the Levite and the poor, in joy and grace before God.

- Centre. The produce travelled because God chose the meeting place, not the worshipper. A loving heart did not want to stay home.

- Provision. For some, distance made obedience impossible. So God let them turn the harvest into money, and nothing stood between His people and His presence.

- Warning. Men later turned this same gift into a trade in the temple courts. God's kindness can be abused.

Deuteronomy 14:25 · Darby

then shalt thou give it for money, and bind the money together in thy hand, and go to the place which Jehovah thy God will choose,

Deuteronomy 14 ends with rules for the yearly tithe. It had to be eaten in the one place God chose for His name. Verse 25 speaks to the family living too far away to carry a wagon-load of grain, wine and oil there. God's answer is simple: sell the produce, carry the money, and make the journey anyway.

Who owns the land

The tenth was never a tax on private property. It was an admission that the property was not theirs to begin with.

Israel's worship rested on one great foundation: both they themselves and their land belonged to the Lord. The land was His, and they held it as tenants under Him. At set times they had to testify to this precious truth by faithfully tithing their land. "You shall tithe all the yield of your seed that comes from the field year by year." They were to acknowledge, in this practical way, that the Lord owned it all, and never lose sight of it. They were to own no landlord but the Lord their God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Distance did not license a nearer altar

The obvious solution to a long journey would be to hold the feast at home. The commentary answers that objection head-on.

Some people did not know the God of Israel and cared nothing about Him. To them it might seem strange to see the people travelling — many of them — a long way from home, carrying their tithes to one particular spot. They might feel inclined to question the need for such a custom. "Why not eat at home?" they might say. But such people simply knew nothing about the matter... To the Israel of God there was one great moral reason for going to the appointed place. That reason lay in the glorious motto — "the Lord is there." Suppose an Israelite had deliberately decided to stay home, or to go to some place of his own choosing. He would have met neither the Lord there nor his brothers, and so he would have eaten alone.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Money made the journey possible

What could not be carried could be converted. The tenth was sold at home and re-bought at the sanctuary.

If they lived a long way from Jerusalem, they were allowed to sell the tenth of their produce for money and bring that money to Jerusalem. There they would spend it on whatever food they wanted to eat "before the Lord" (vv. 24-26). The Lord wanted them to rejoice before Him, not to eat up their produce in selfish greed away from God's presence.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The arrangement shows God's care, not His leniency

The provision is written from God's side. He is the one who did not want the distance to keep anyone away.

This is perfectly beautiful. The Lord, in His tender care and considerate love, took account of everything. He would not leave a single difficulty in the way of His beloved people as they gathered round Himself. He had His own special joy in seeing His redeemed people happy in His presence. All who loved His name would delight to meet the loving desire of His heart by coming to the centre He had appointed.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Rent paid in gladness

Commentators distinguish this tithe from the one given to the Levites in Numbers 18. Here the giver eats his own tenth in God's presence.

In the instruction in Deuteronomy, they take it up to where God's name is, to eat it there. The object is to centre their faith in the Lord, and that in connection with joy and grace... They paid their rent to the Lord for their land in this way, but in joy and gladness, in grace from Him, and with the poor, while also feeding their families with it. They feasted in grace around the Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A kind provision, later twisted

Carrying money instead of goods created a market at the sanctuary. People later corrupted it to serve their own greed.

This shows how people could corrupt the kind provisions of the law — and did corrupt them — to serve their own greedy ends. There was instruction on this point in Deuteronomy 14:22-26, and they might argue that they were only doing what the law allowed. The law told them to bring their money and buy what they needed. But it gave no approval to the greedy practices they had brought in, which turned the house of God into a money-making centre.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The excuse that still gets made

The principle is applied directly to Christians who find reasons not to gather.

If any Israelite was found neglecting the blessed occasion of assembling with his brothers, at the divinely chosen place and time, it would simply have proved that he had no heart for God or for His people — or, worse, that he was deliberately absent. He might reason as he pleased about being happy at home, happy elsewhere; it was a false happiness, because it was happiness found in the path of disobedience, the path of wilful neglect of what God had appointed.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Landlord. The tithe was rent, not charity. Israel held the land as tenants, and the tenth admitted that the Lord owned it.

- Centre. The rent had to travel to the place where God put His name. A nearer, self-chosen place would have left the worshipper eating alone.

- Provision. Where the load could not travel, God let the value travel instead, so distance would not keep a family from His presence.

- Joy. The point was not duty but glad enjoyment — feasting in grace around the Lord, and sharing with the poor.

- Warning. People later abused the same money-and-market rule for gain. A kind rule can be kept in the letter and broken in the heart.

Deuteronomy 14:26 · Darby

and thou shalt give the money for whatever thy soul desireth, for oxen, or for sheep, or for wine, or for strong drink, or for whatever thy soul asketh of thee; and thou shalt eat there before Jehovah thy God, and thou shalt rejoice, thou, and thy house.

This traveller has already sold his tithe for silver, because the sanctuary was too far away to carry grain and cattle there. Now he arrives, buys food and drink of his own choosing, and eats it in God's presence. How does a tenth given to God end up on the giver's own plate?

A tithe the giver ate himself

Israel had more than one tithe. Commentators identify the one in this verse as a separate arrangement set out in Deuteronomy.

The tithe spoken of here is one of the extra laws in Deuteronomy. It is a second tithe, not the first one, which belonged to God alone. This second tithe was eaten at the sanctuary by the man whose land was tithed, along with his household and the Levite, who was never to be forgotten. So he comes up to acknowledge God's mercies before Him and to enjoy them with God.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Distance was no excuse

Verse 24 allowed them to sell the produce first. One writer sees in that permission God clearing away every obstacle to their gathering.

The Lord, in His tender care and thoughtful love, took account of everything. He would not leave a single difficulty in the way of His beloved people when they gathered around Himself. He had His own special joy in seeing His redeemed people happy in His presence. And all who loved His Name would be glad to meet the loving desire of His heart by gathering at the centre He Himself had appointed.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Whatever you desire — but before Him

The money buys whatever the man wants. What the law fixes is not the menu but the place and the company.

If they lived a long way from Jerusalem, they could sell the tenth of their produce for money and bring that money to Jerusalem. There they would spend it on whatever food they wanted to eat "before the Lord" (vs.24:26). For the Lord wanted them to rejoice before Him, not to eat up their produce in selfish greed, away from God's presence.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

One writer contrasts worship here with worship in the earlier books of Moses:

In the previous books, worship was a matter of how near you came to God in His sanctuary. Here it is thankful enjoyment of the blessings He promised and gave. They enjoyed them only before Jehovah, so that the blessings were never cut off from Him, and they enjoyed them in the spirit of grace… So it is not priestly drawing near to God, but enjoyment of the fruit of His promises, in grace with Him. This characterises the whole book.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"Wine or strong drink"

The list includes "strong drink" — the Hebrew word shekar. One writer gathered up how the word has been understood down the years:

The ancient translations, the Greek and Latin church writers, and the dictionary makers of both early and recent times all agree in describing it as a drink that makes people drunk… Elsewhere, it was a man-made wine produced from barley, wheat, honey, or any fruit except grapes.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

So the money could buy a drink strong enough to make a man drunk — for a meal eaten in God's presence.

Seated at God's table

The man hands his offering over to God, and then eats it himself. That double movement makes the meal a picture of fellowship.

Here everything was sanctified, because they had presented it to Jehovah. So they owned two things at once: that the people were His, and that all they had came from Him. But in giving Him back what He had given them, they enjoyed these things in fellowship with Him and with their families. They were things common to God and to the people — given by Him, offered to Him, and enjoyed in His presence in communion with one another, God Himself sharing in them, for they had offered the whole to Him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

How the provision was later abused

Centuries later, traders were doing business in the house of God. They could point to this very passage as their defence.

This shows how kind provisions of the law could be twisted, and were twisted, to serve man's greed. Deuteronomy 14:22-26 gave instruction on this point, and they might argue that they were only doing what the law allowed. The law told them to bring their money and buy what they needed. But it gave no approval to the greedy practices they had brought in, which turned the house of God into a money-making centre.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Owner. The tithe confessed that the land and its crops belonged to God. The man then ate this second tenth himself, coming up to acknowledge God's mercies and enjoy them with Him.

- Obstacle. Distance excused no one. The produce became money, so nothing stood between a worshipper and the centre God had appointed.

- Appetite. The list is wide: oxen, sheep, wine, strong drink, whatever your appetite craves. God held nothing back from their enjoyment. He only refused to let them enjoy it away from Him.

- Household. What they gave to God came back to them to eat in His company, so the family's meal and God's portion were one and the same.

- Danger. Later, people twisted this same generous rule into a temple market — a kindness of God turned into a trade.

Deuteronomy 14:27 · Darby

And thou shalt not forsake the Levite that is within thy gates; for he hath no portion nor inheritance with thee.

The closing verses of Deuteronomy 14 turn from what Israel may eat to what Israel must give. Israel brought a tenth of the harvest to the place God chose, and ate it there in His presence, the whole household glad. In the middle of that family scene God names one man who owns no field, and tells Israel never to overlook him.

The tithe and the true landlord

The whole arrangement rests on a question of ownership. The tenth was how Israel admitted it, year after year.

Israel's worship rested on one great foundation: both they themselves and their land belonged to the Lord. The land was His, and they held it as tenants under Him. Again and again they were to bear witness to this precious truth by tithing their land faithfully. They were to admit, in this practical way, that the Lord owned it all, and never lose sight of it. They were to own no other landlord but the Lord their God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why one man had no portion

The Levite's empty hands were not misfortune but appointment. He had no land because God had given him other work.

They must not forsake the Levite. The Levites served the priests, and they had no assigned inheritance. That is because they were God's servants, there to care for the spiritual needs of the people.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What he lost in land he gained in God Himself. That is why the people's gifts reached him.

God marks out afresh their special place of having Himself for their portion, so that what went to Him fell to them. This gave a deep sense of being identified with the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Bound up with God's portion

The Levite lived on what came to God. So the altar and God's servants rose and fell together. Israel's history shows it.

Look through the history of Israel. When things were in anything like a healthy condition, the altar of God was well cared for. As a result, the priests and Levites were well supplied. If the Lord had His portion, His servants were sure to have theirs. If He was neglected, so were they. They were bound up together. The people were to bring their offerings to God, and He shared them with His servants. The priests and the Levites were not to demand anything from the people. Instead, the people had the privilege of bringing their gifts to the altar of God, and He let His servants feed on the fruit of His people's devotion to Him.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The company God gives him

It is worth noticing who the Levite is listed beside.

There is an important connection in which the Lord classed the Levites, whose inheritance He Himself was. He classed them with those who were the pitiful objects of His care in a poor groaning creation. They were not among those whom men hold in high esteem. They were among those He treats with mercy.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Where God governs, a household's gladness never closes in on itself.

We know well how the family tends to crowd out generous feeling, and how it tends to shut itself up in nothing better than a refined selfishness. It is not so where God governs. There, even when the family gathers inside its own gates, the Levite, the stranger, and the fatherless all have their part. It was God who made the family rejoice, and they were to reach out to those who were strangers to it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same principle now

The same arrangement carries over into Christian work today. There is one careful warning attached about where the worker looks.

The priests and the Levites of old lived on the offerings the people brought. It is the same now. Some are truly called of God, gifted by Christ, and fitted by the Holy Spirit to preach the gospel. They give themselves constantly and diligently to that glorious work. They have a moral right to material support. It is not that they should look to those they preach to for a fixed sum. There is no such idea in the New Testament. The workman must look to his Master, and to Him alone, for support.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Owner. The tithe was rent, not charity. Israel held the land as tenants, and the tenth said out loud that the Lord was the only landlord.

- Portion. The Levite had no field because he had God instead — so what the people gave to God came to him.

- Bound. God's portion and His servant's portion travel together. When Israel cared for the altar, the Levite ate. When Israel neglected God, they neglected him too.

- Company. God lists His servant not with the great, but with those He treats with mercy. He will not let a household's joy shrink into refined selfishness.

- Today. God's people support those who give themselves to the work. The worker looks to his Master alone, never to a fixed sum from his hearers.

Deuteronomy 14:28 · Darby

At the end of three years thou shalt bring forth all the tithe of thine increase the same year, and shalt lay it up within thy gates;

Deuteronomy 14 closes with an unusual rule: every third year the tithe stayed home instead of going up to the place of worship. Why the change, what does "within your towns" mean, and why does God tie a blessing to a meal for the poor?

What "at the end of every three years" means

One reference work sums up what this year was called and what changed in it:

Every third year was called 'the year of tithing.' Josephus says a third tenth was given. More probably, the second tenth was handled differently that year: it was not carried to Jerusalem, but laid up 'within the gates,' and shared there with "the Levites . . . and the stranger, and the fatherless, and the widow." Deut. 14:28-29; Amos 4:4.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Commentators differ on whether this was a separate third tenth or the same tenth handled another way. They agree on the place. The tithe stayed in the towns where people lived — older translations say "within your gates" — and never went up to Jerusalem.

God's rent from His own land

The tenth was not the farmer's charity fund. It was rent, paid to the Owner of the land:

The year of tithing showed that Jehovah owned the land. It also showed the lovely way He wanted His rents spent: meeting the need of His workmen and of His poor.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The family table, widened

The food stayed at home, so this was a family scene. Family is where generosity is hardest:

They were not compelled to take this to the one place that God had consecrated. It had more of the family character. But a beautiful feature goes with it. The Levite (because he has no part or inheritance with them), the stranger, the fatherless and the widow within their gates were to come, and eat, and be satisfied, so that Jehovah their God would bless them in all the work of their hand. Even in the witness of blessing at home there must be the largeness of heart that goes out to those who have no friends to care for them... We know well how the family tends to crowd out generous feeling, and how it tends to shut itself up in nothing better than a refined selfishness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Note why the Levite is on the list. He has no share in the land — the one man in Israel with no field of his own eats from everyone else's.

Grace, not religious duty

No trip to the sanctuary was needed here. A household simply passed on to the poor what God had given it:

The tithe of the third year is not the family joy of the people with God. It is the grace that brought enjoyment to strangers, to those in want, and to the servants of God who had no inheritance. All this took place within their gates. They had the privilege of acting in grace from Jehovah, passing on to His poor what He had given them. They did not go to the house of Jehovah. They invited the widow, the orphan, and the Levite to their house to rejoice, and Jehovah blessed them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Shared, not merely handed over

The food was not dropped at the door and left. People ate it together, and one writer sees Christ's own way in that:

Every third year we find this tithe used at home, shared with the Levite, the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow. Not simply given to them, but shared with them — a deeper thing. Christ does not give merely, so that we may carry it away from Him; He shares. This is fellowship.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Made the channel of His kindness

Three words carry the promise: come, eat, be satisfied. That is how God Himself acts, and He gives His people the same work:

There is a special sweetness in the words, "shall come" — "shall eat" — "and be satisfied." So like our own ever gracious God! He delights to meet the need of all. He opens His hand, and satisfies the desire of every living thing. And more than that, it is His joy to make His people the channel through which His grace, His kindness and the sympathy of His heart flow out to all. How precious is this! What a privilege to be the dispensers of His bounty, the exponents of His goodness!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Owner. The tenth was God's rent on land He owned, and the third year showed how He wanted His rent spent — on His workmen and His poor.

- Address. That year the tithe stayed in the town instead of going to the sanctuary. The giving took on a family character.

- Guests. The Levite came because he had no inheritance. The stranger, orphan and widow came because they had no one. A home blessed by God had to open its doors.

- Manner. They shared the food; they did not just hand it over. That is fellowship — Christ shares, He does not give at arm's length.

- Result. Come, eat, be satisfied. God meets need, and He makes His people the channel of His kindness.

Deuteronomy 14:29 · Darby

and the Levite -- for he hath no portion nor inheritance with thee -- and the stranger, and the fatherless, and the widow, that are within thy gates, shall come, and shall eat and be satisfied; that Jehovah thy God may bless thee in all the work of thy hand which thou doest.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.